HomeMy WebLinkAbout111495 CC Agenda· /
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior
to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that
meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
NOVEMBER 14, 1995- 7:00 PM
5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Councilrremecula Redevelopment AgenCY pursuant
Government Code Sections: : .: ..
1. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAI~ ·PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Propertyi 27500 Jefferson
Avenue. Negotiating parties: TemecUla RedeVelopment AgencY, 'Jan Wellerr RV and Donna L,
Reeves·Trust, Under negotiation: lease terms - term and payment.
2. § 54956.8, CONFERENCE 'WITH REAL :PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: .Assessor's
Parcel No. 921 -740-001 , Murrieta Creek south of Winchester Road; Assessor's Parcel No. 921-
280-013, Murrietta Creek south of Rancho California Road. Negotiating parties: City of ,
Temecula, KRDC and Riverside County Flood Control District; Under negotiation: terml and
payment.
3. §54956.9, CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL, EXISTING LITIGATION; Indian Child
Welfare, et al v. City of Temecula; Copeland v. City of Temecula et. el.
4. §54956.9(b), CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL, ANTICIPATED LITIGATION, significant
exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b), two cases.
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 95-13
Resolution: No. 95-91
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding
R:~a~ende%l 11496 I
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Pastor Robert Cash, Shepherd's Footsteps International Ministry
Councilmember Roberrs
Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
Assemblyman Bruce Thompson's Annual Visit
A total of 30 minutes is provided so.members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out
and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT. CALENDAR
2
Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
2.2
2.3
Approve the minutes of October 10, 1995.
Approve the minutes of October 12, 1995.
Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995.
R:~e~ende%111496 2
3
4
6
7
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Destruction of Records ReaUest
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
Out-of-State Travel
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans.
Liabilitv Insurance Renewal
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the City of Temecula Liability Insurance Policy Renewal with Insurance
Company of the West for the period of December 1, 1995 through December 1,
1996.
Deleaation of Authority in Processina and Settlina Claims Aaainst City of Temecula
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 - Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DELEGATING
TO THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY CLERK CERTAIN POWERS AND
AUTHORITY IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS FILED AGAINST THE CITY
R:'~4end~111496 3
8
10
11
Resolution Stating the City of Temecula's Commitment to Library Fundine
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA STATING
THE COMMITMENT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO RECOVER STATE LIBRARY
FUNDING WHICH HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN
Acceptance of Public Streets in the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No.
20703-3, and 22962) (Southeasterly of Winchester Road, Southerly of Nicolas Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-3 AND 22962)
Accept Public Imorovements in Tract No. 20703-3
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703;
10.2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage, and Water and
Sewer Bond amounts and the release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond;
10.3 Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders, and Direct the City Clerk to
so advise the Clerk of the board of supervisors, the developer and surety.
Release Grading Bond for Import to School Site
(Southeast of Winchester at Margarita Road Intersection)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Authorize release of Grading Bond for Import of Soils to Chapparal High School Site;
11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Permittee and Surety.
R:%AOenda%111496 4
12
13
14
15
Release Public Imorovement Warranty, Labor and Material, and Monument Bonds in Tract
No. 21674-3
(Southwest of intersection of Rancho California. Road at Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material
bonds for Street, Sewer and Water Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation
in Tract No. 21674-3;
12.2 -Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer.
Release Gradina Bond for Tract No. 21067
(Northerly of Intersection of Pala Road at Loma Linda Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Authorize release of Grading Bond for Tract No. 21067;
13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Solicitation of Construction Bids for FY94-95 Annual Pavement Manaaement Project.
PW95-06
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works
to solicit public construction bids for FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management
Project No. PW95-06.
Professional Services Aareement with Enqineerina Ventures, Inc. for Rancho California
Road and Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Imorovement Project No. 5
RECOMMENDATION:
15..1
Award a contract for the design of Rancho California Road and Santa Cecilia Drive
sidewalk improvement project to Engineering Ventures, Inc., for $10,950.00and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
15.2
15.3
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $! ,095.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Authorize a transfer of $9,636.00 of Development Impact Fees (Public Facilities) to
the Capital Projects Fund.
15.4' Appropriate $49,079 in the Capital Projects Fund to Account No. 210-165-661-
5804 for the total costs to complete this proiect.
R:%,AOe~de%111496 6
16
17
18
Walcott Corridor Reimbursement Aareements with R.C.W.D. for Work Performed Durina
the Construction, Proiect PW94-10
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Approve reimbursement agreement with the Rancho California Water District for the
cost of relocation of certain water improvements made necessary by the Walcott
Corridor, Project PW94-10.
Professional Geotechnical Services Contract with Law/Crandall, Inc. for Walcott Corridor,
Proiect PW94-10
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Award a contract for Professional Geotechnical Services for the Walcott Corridor,
Project PW94-10 to Law/Crandall, Inc. for $34,565.00 and authorize the Mayor to
execute the contract.
17.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $3,456.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Award of Contract for Riqht-Of-Wav Weed Control Pre-Emerc~ent and Post-EmercJent
APPlications, Project No. PW95-24
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Award a contract for Right-Of-Way Weed Control Pre-Emergent and Post-Emergent
Applications, Project No. PW95-24 to Pestmasters Services of Temecula in the
amount of $25,755.47 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
18.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $2,575.55 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
19
Award of Contract for City Wide Right-Of-Way Tree Trimminc~ ProQram
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Reverse the decision to award Citywide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program to
Arbor-Pro Tree Service.
19.2 Award a contract for Citywide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program to L. Williams
Landscaping, Inc. for $16,880.00 and authorize the 'Mayor to execute the contract.
19.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $1,688.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
R:'~4end~111496 9
20
21
22
23
Award of Contract for FY95-96 City Wide A.C. Street Repair Project No. PW95-20
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Award a contract for FY 95-96 Citywide A.C. Street Repair, Project No. PW95-20
to Hillcrest Construction in the amount of ~57,110.00and authorize the Mayor to
execute the contract.
20.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $5,711.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Award of Contract of FY95-96 Citywide P.CoC. Reoairs Project No. PW95-21
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Award a contract for FY 95-9'6 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW95-21 to
West Coast Construction in the amount of $38,951.00 and authorize the Mayor to
execute the contract.
21.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $3,895.10 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Comoletion and Acceotance of the Rancho Vista/Mira Loma Dr. Sidewalk Improvements,
Project No. PW94-19
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Accept the Rancho Vista/Mira Loma Drive Sidewalk Improvements, Project No.
PW94-19, as complete;
22.2 Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond,
and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
22.3 Direct the City Clerk to release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after
the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Comoletion and Acceotance of the Access Ramos. Project No. PW95-04
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Accept the Access Ramps, Project No. PW95-04, as complete;
23.2 Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond,
and accept a one (1) years Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the
contract;
23.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
of Completion if no liens have been filed.
R:~end~111496 7
24
"No Parkino" Zones on the East Side of Front Street from SR 79(S) to Santiaqo Road
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET
FROM SR 79(S} TO SANTIAGO ROAD ADJACENT TO ALL DRIVEWAYS
25
Award of Construction Contract for Parkview Site Imorovement Project, Phase 1. Fire
Station 84 - Project No. PW95-09CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1
Approve the plans and specifications and award a contract for Parkview Site
Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84, Project PW95-09CSD, to Great
West Contractors for the base bid and the two alternates in the amount of
$1,970,842.46 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
25.2
Authorize the Mayor to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $197,084.24which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
26
Aoorove Grant of Easements for Walcott Corridor. Project PW94-10
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING
OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES
EASEMENTS ON WALCOTT LANE AND LA SERENA WAY
7
Award of Bid for Reolacement Network Server for City Hall
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1 Award a bid for the purchase of the replacement network server for City Hall, Bid
Number 95-33 to Inacom Information Systems, San Diego, California for
$37,711.42.
R:~,Agenda%111486 8
28
Award of Contract for the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10
RECOMMENDATION:
28.1 Award a contract for the construction of the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 to
Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction for $1,716,637.50
and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
28.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $171,663.75which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
28.3 Adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the
Walcott Corridor Project.
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING,
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING,
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
R:%,e, genda\l 11496 9
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 95-01
Resolution: No. CSD 95-07
CALL TO ORDER: President Ronald H. Roberrs
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the. Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an
item n~l; listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to
Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your
name and .address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 10, 1995.
2
1.2 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995.
Quitclaim of Easement Within Margarita Community Park
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Accept a quitclaim deed from Eastern Municipal Water District for an easement on
the Margarita Community Park Site, and authorize the City Clerk to record the
document with the Riverside County Recorder's Office.
R:~e, de~l 114~6 10
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~a, genda%1114~E. 11
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 95-01
Resolution: No. RDA 95-08
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
ROLL CALL:
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the. Redevelopment
Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not
listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should
be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.2 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995.
2 Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Consider approval of an RDA small business loan to the Health Zone (natural/health
food store) to be located at the Temecula Plaza, Ynez and Solana Way.
R:~enda\l 11486 12
AGENCY BUSINESS
3 Proposed Amendments to the Bylaws of the Old Town RedeveloDment Advisory
Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Review and approve the proposed amendments to the Bylaws of the Old Town
Redevelopment Advisory Committee.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:%AOenda%111486 13
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY 'FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
Next in Order:
Resolution No.: No. FA 95-06
CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the. Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda a pink "Request
To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
2
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995.
Aooraisal of the Old Town Westside Imorovement Authority Community Facilities District,
No. 1
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve agreement to secure professional services for a complete narrative
appraisal on the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities
District, No. I and No. 2.
R:%,e. eenda%l 11496 14
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors before s public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
3 Financina for Old Town Area Public Imorovements and the Western Bypass Corridor
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Open and continue the four (4) Public Hearings listed below:
CFD 1 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes
CFD 2 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes
CFD 1 Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 1
CFD 2 Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 2
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~4end~111486 16
CALL TO ORDBI: President-Patricie H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL: Lindemens, Parks, Robarts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COM~e-~IITS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council abo~,t an item not listed on the Agenda a pink 'Request
To Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995.
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~a~efde~l 11486
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
29 Planning Aoolication No. 95-0078. Develooment Aareement for BCI/CCL
RECOMMENDATION:
29.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for PA95-0078;
29.2 Introduce and read. by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BCIICCL
VENTURE NO. I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND BCIICCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, PLANNING AREA 14, MARGARITA
VILLAGE, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0078
COUNCIL BUSINESS
30 Renamina of Temecula Library
RECOMMENDATION:
30.1 Authorize staff to request that the County Board of Supervisors rename the
"Temecula Library the "Temecula-Murrieta Library."
31 Community Services Fundine Ad Hoc Subcommittee
RECOMMENDATION:
31.1 Appoint two Councilmembers to serve on an ad hoc subcommittee to review two
(2) applications for the FY 1995-96 Community Services Funding program.
R:%AOenda%111496 17
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~kOenda\l 11496 18
ITEM
1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD OCTOBER 10, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:00 PM at the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor
PRESENT 5
Jeffrey E. Stone presiding.
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks,
Roberts, Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, Assistant City Attorney Greg Diaz, and City
Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor John Webb, Southwest Christian Church.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Flag Ceremony was presented by Boy Scout Troop 301, Kirk Wright, Committee
Chairman.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Police Chief Pete Labahn recognized Officer Chuck Mungle as Temecula's first canine handler.
Mayor Stone presented Officer Mungle with a certificate of appreciation for his serve to the
community since 1991 and the completion of 400 hours of training in basic handling skills and
narcotics detection. Chief Labahn also introduced new canine handler Joe Nardone and his
partner "Tango".
Mr. Garrett Craig of U. S. Safe Quake Supply gave a presentation to the City Council on the
Earthquake Gas Shut-Off Valve.
Councilmember Roberts asked if the valve also works with propane. Mr. Craig answered it
is equally effective with propane.
Mayor Stone stated the City of Los Angeles mandates this type valve for all new development
and asked that staff investigate various valves in existence, do a cost analysis and research
incentive programs other areas are offering.
Councilmember Parks asked that this be placed on the agenda for further discussion, prior to
assigning staff time.
Minutes\ 1 O\ 1 O\95 - 1 - 1 O/18/95
CiW Council Minutes October 10, 1995
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PatriCia Keller, P.O. Box 521, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the Entertainment Center,
questioning the issues on upcoming public hearings. She also questioned Mr. Buffman's
ability to purchase property in Old Town.
City Manager Bradley stated that hearings are scheduled for November 14, 1995 and many
of these issues will be explored at that time.
Sharon Miller, 44618 Pala Road, requested the City clean out Temecula Creek and questioned
the 16 acres of land sold as a habitat preserve.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Parks asked that a list of his Council Committee assignments be placed on the
next agenda for review.
Mayor Stone quoted a newspaper article reporting that Temecula again ranked as the Number
One place to live in Riverside County with respect to families, number two for retirees and
number three for singles.
Councilmember Roberts requested that the City enforce the sign ordinance with regard to
campaign signs, especially around the newly acquired Duck Pond. City Manager Bradley
stated that staff has been attempting to contact candidates, and staff will have the offending
signs removed by Friday.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Stone listed a correction on the minutes of Sept. 26th, Page 9, which reversed the
absent and abstained vote on Item 22.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-15. The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberts,
Stone
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes% 1 O% 10\95 -2- 1 OI18/95
City Council Minutes October10, 1995
Standard Ordinance 'Adootion Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
2.1
2.2
2.3
Approve the minutes of August 31, 1995
Approve the minutes of September 19, 1995.
Approve the minutes of September 26, 1995 as corrected.
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's RePort as of July 31.1995
4.1- Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 1995.
Resolution for Authority to Carry out Transportation Enhancement Activities
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-83
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, DESI G NATING TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES
TO BE ADMINISTERED BY CITY OF TEMECULA
Minutes\l 0\10\95 -3- 10118/95
CiW Council Minutes October 1 O, 1995
6. "No ParkinQ" Zones on the West Side of Ynez Road South of Solana Way to Provide
Additional Driveway SiQht Distance
6.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING 235 TOTAL FEET OF 'NO PARKING' ZONES ON THE WEST
SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD SOUTH OF THE SOLANA WAY AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT
e
Acceotance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street Svstem (Within Tracts No.
20735-7. 20735-8. 20735-9. and 22627-F)
e
e
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM {WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20735-7, 20735-8,
20735-9, AND 22627-F)
Release Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds in Tract No. 22627-F
8.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty bond riders for Street,
and Sewer and Water System improvements in Tract No. 22627-F;
8.2 Direct the City Glerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
Reduce Labor and Material Bonds in Parcel Mao No. 23472
9.1 Authorize reduction in Labor and Material bond amounts for the improvement
of a private storm drain system;
9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
developer and the surety.
Mi nutee% 1 O\ 10\95 -4- 10118/95
City Council Minutes October 10. 1995
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. 22962
10. 1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22962;
10. 2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage, and Water and
Sewer Bond amounts and the release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond;
10.3 Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders;
10.4 Approve the Agreement Regarding Subdivision Improvements;
10.5 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
developer and surety.
Release Public Improvement Warranty Bond in Tract No. ~3267-1
11.1 Authorize the release of the faithful performance warranty bond for street, and
water and sewer system improvements;
11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
Award of Contract for City Wide RiQht-Of-Wav Tree Trimmine Program
12.1 Award a contract for City Wide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program to Arbor-
Pro Tree Service for $12,555.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the
contract..
12.2 Authorize the City manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $1,255.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
Amended Memorandu~n of UnderstandinQ - Access to Winchester Road and State
Route 79 South
13.1 Approve the amended Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with State of
California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and authorize the Mayor to
sign the MOU.
Renewal of Annual Street Strioing Contract Project No. PW94-17
14.1 Extend the Street Striping Contract with I.P.S. Services, Inc. of San Bernardino
for a period of one (1) year beginning November 15, 1995 and ending
November 15, 1996, in an amount not to exceed $97,000.
Minutee\l 0% 10\95 -5- 10118/95
CiW Council Minutes October 10, 1995
15.
Out-Of-State Travel Plans
15.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans.
RECESS
Mayor Stone called a recess at 7:45 PM to accommodate the previously scheduled Community
Services District Meeting, Temecula Redevelopment Agency Meeting and The Old Town
Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Meeting. The meeting was
reconvened at 8:26 PM.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
16. Plannina Aoolication No. PA95-0066 (Variance) 29105 Front Street - Aooeal
(Continued from the meeting of September 26, 1995)
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report and stated
Mr. Kashmere has agreed to apply for a lot line adjustment and stated a letter has been
received from Mr. KaShmere withdrawing the variance request, and agreeing to terms
as previously discussed.
Mayor Stone closed the public hearing at 8:30 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to accept
the Applicant's withdrawal of Planning Application No. PA95-0066 and agreement
entitled "License Agreement Between the City of Temecula and Electrend, Inc., for Use
of Real Property" and direct the Mayor to execute said agreement on behalf of the City.
The motion was unanimously carried.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
17. Murrieta Creek Veqetation Removal
Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented a slide presentation showing existing
conditions in Murrieta Creek. Maintenance Superintendent Brad Buron identified the
location of each slide.
Mayor Stone asked if the land adjacent to the creek is primarily private property. Public
Works Director Kicak stated that most of the land surrounding the creek is privately
owned and private owners are the only ones who have the right to enter to clean out
the creek.
Minutes%10%10%95 -6- 10118/95
City Council Minutes October 10, 1995
Mayor Stone asked if the City will help guide property owners through the permit
process. Public Works Director Kicak stated the City would facilitate obtaining permits
by working through Flood Control and the State Agencies.
Dennis Chiniaeff, 29321 Via Norte stated that mitigation is required for emergency
entry permits, and explained that as mitigation, The U.S. Department of Fish and Game
requires the area to be replanted. He reported they will not allow property owners to
keep the creek free of vegetation.
Mayor Stone suggested making a trip to Washington D.C. to talk to the Department of
the Interior, and explain the serious problem that exists in Temecula. Councilmember
Birdsall concurred, but asked that appropriate steps be taken, such as applying for
appropriate permits and getting facts together. She also requested that an out-of-state
authorization be placed on the next agenda so such a trip is authorized should the need
arise.
Staff was directed to: 1 ) Investigate all of the processes that may be available to the
City for clearing of the creek bed; 2) To notify the property owners along the creek of
the danger created by the overgrowth and to assist them in securing necessary permits
to clear the creek of overgrown vegetation; 3) to contact the Flood Control District for
a status update on the Murrieta Creek improvement project and 4) To place an approval
of out-of-state travel on the next agenda to address the possible future need for the
Mayor or a Council designee to travel to Washington, D.C. to petition the City's federal
legislators for assistance in resolving this problem.
18.
19.
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Aooointments
City Clerk June S. Greek presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Mayor Stone to appoint Knox
Johnson and Ronald C. Perry to serve full three-year terms on the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission. The motion was unanimously carried.
Community Services Commission AoDointments
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
appoint Henry Miller and Jack A. Henz to serve full three-year terms on the Community
Services Commission. The motion was unanimously carried.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
None given.
Minutes%1 O\ 10~95 -7- 1 OI18/S5
City Council Minutes October 10, 1995
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Robert, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to adjourn
at 9:00 PM to a meeting on September 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Temecula City Hall, 43174
Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590. The motion was unanimously carried.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes\l 0\10%95 -8- 10118/95
MINUTES OF A WORKSHOP
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD OCTOBER 12, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:01 PM in the Main
Conference Room, City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Jeffrey
E. Stone presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks,
Stone, Roberrs
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, Assistant City Attorney Greg Diaz and City
Clerk June Greek.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Parks.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Fire Chief Jim Wright introduced the new Division Chief Jim Barrons who will be serving as
the Fire Chief for the City of Temeculao Chief Barrons was welcomed to Temecula by Mayor
Stone and the City Councilmembers.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Annexation Workshop
City Manager Ronald Bradley introduced the 'purpose of the workshop and outlined the
issues to be addressed by staff.
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill gave an overview of the annexation
goals and policies as contained in the City's general plan. He discussed the policies
that deal with land use control issues that provide opportunities for the City through
specific plans. Mr. Thornhill also pointed out specific projects within the northern
sphere area which are impending and recommended that the Council consider priorities,
level of infrastructure, fiscal impacts over the long term, appropriate land use
intensities, and density as they relate to the general plan process. He also suggested
use of development agreements to offset negative impacts.
Public Works Director/City Engineer Joe Kicak discussed the public works issues that
are present when considering annexation. He outlined the services that the City would
be required to provide to an annexed area and pointed out the advantages to the City
to furnish these services at the approved City standards.
Minutes\l 0\12\95 -1 - 10117/95
City Council Minutes October 12, 1995
Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services reported on the impacts that the
annexation of the sphere of influence areas would have on the delivery of parks and
recreation services. He also discussed the Community Service District levels and future
fiscal impacts if the sphere area was annexed. He concluded that the ultimate
developed parks service level would be somewhat lower than the level currently
established within the City. He stated the delivery of parks would occur later in the
sphere area but the fiscal capacity of the sphere could support development of parks
and. recreation services.
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo discussed the impacts of annexation on animal
control, vector control, Code enforcement, weed abatement, building inspections and
plan checking services.
Police Chief Peter LaBahn spoke to the law enforcement issues that would be affected
should the annexation of the sphere of influence areas occur. He pointed out that the
level of service in the sphere area currently is much lower than that of the City's
incorporated area. He reported that the anticipated staffing needs would increase by
approximately six officers per shift at an annual cost of $864,000.00 He stated that
at build-out 6.5 officers would be needed based on current City service levels.
Fire Chief Jim Barron presented the issues that would impact fire services within the
City and the sphere area, based on current City service levels.
Finance Director Genie Roberts introduced the revenues and cost assumptions that
were prepared by Hoffman and Associates. She then introduced Brian Geist of the firm
of Hoffman Associates who presented the model and fiscal impact report.
Brian Geist addressed the fiscal model and impacts in the area within the City Limits.
He stressed that the projections are conservative and within the sphere of influence
area the estimates are heavier than may be possible for the projected population
figures. He also presented both an aggressive and conservative retail assumption for
the sphere area.
.City Manager Ron Bradley summed up the presentations and stressed that all of the
impacts spelled out in the Hoffman Report are based on assumptions. He also stated
that fiscal impacts should be balanced by the positive advantages of having control of
the land use patterns and density within the sphere area.
RECESS
Mayor Stone declared a recess at 8:00 PM.
members present at 8:11 PM.
The meeting was reconvened with all
Councilmember Birdsall questioned weed abatement and asked if City staff or County
Fire performs this function. Building Official Tony Elmo responded that the City is
responsible for weed abatement within the City limits and that County Fire has
responsibility for the unincorporated area.
Minutes\l O~12\95 -2- 10117/95
City Council Minutes October 12. 1995
Councilmember Roberrs asked the reason the Redhawk and Vail Ranch areas were not
specifically analyzed in the report since he feels that annexation requests are imminent
for those areas. Community Development Director Thornhill responded that the
analysis of that area would not be difficult and could be done very quickly based on the
fact it represents a mostly single-family residential base and the impacts would be
primarily negative ones.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans expressed concern regarding the estimate of only one
percent (1%) revenue projection over surplus.
Councilmember Parks asked if costs for construction and maintenance of surface
streets in the sphere area have been prepared. City Engineer Joe Kicak responded that
the streets would be constructed by developers at the time of development and that
the usable life of these would be twenty (20) years.
Councilmember Roberts questioned who would now bear the cost of infrastructure in
the area that was to have been constructed by Assessment District 161. Mr. Kicak
responded that additional costs would have to be borne by development fees at the
time of construction.
Mayor Stone asked for clarification of the projected increase in Community Service
District fees at build-out. Community Services Director Shawn Nelson stated that this
projected increase will occur within the current City boundaries whether or not
annexations take place. He further clarified that the sphere area will have a greater
capacity to fund parks at a slightly lower per capita rate than the existing City area at
build-out.
Mayor Stone also questioned the statement that the retail projects in the sphere area
may be overestimated. Brian Geist of Hoffman and Associates responded that this
statement reflects the most conservative assumptions contained in the report.
Mayor Pro Tern Karel Lindemans suggested that this matter should be decided by the
voters both in the City and in the sphere areas.
'Assistant City Attorney Greg Diaz advised there are no provisions in the State Code for
City voters to be involved in questions of annexation. He stated that provisions in the
code do allow a protest vote for residents in an area to be annexed.
Adrian McGregor, 34555 Madera de Playa, Temecula spoke in opposition to
uncontrolled growth in the unincorporated areas.
Councilmember Parks stated he feels the City needs to look at each annexation request
on its merits based on the model that has been developed. He addressed the
advantages of control through specific plans, development agreements and other
methods. He also stressed the expansion near French Valley Airport is poised to
encourage additional employers to relocate within the City's north/easterly sphere area.
Minutes~l 0\ 12~95 -3- 10117/95
CiW Council Minutes
October 12. 1995
Councilmember Birdsall stated she feels it is incumbent upon the City Council to give
specific direction to staff as to the City Council's intent to consider future annexation
requests.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans stated his position is that the City is obligated to look
favorably upon a request from the Red Hawk area since that population is already
supporting the City's retail tax base but that he does not see any advantage to
annexation within the north/easterly sphere.
Mayor Stone stated he favors a goal that annexation should be looked at on a
individual basis, looking at all of the benefits including good planning. He also favored
use of development agreements to adjust for balanced revenues and expenditures with
in areas under consideration of annexation.
Councilmember Roberrs said he believes annexation requests can be Considered on a
case by case basis.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans state he feels an annexation request should not be
considered unless it brings the City a higher percentage to revenue than expenditure.
Community Development Director Thornhill suggested that staff draw up some policies
for Council adoption that would outline the concerns to be addressed when the City
is considering annexation requests.
The City Council concurred by consensus that this direction be given to staff.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to
adjourn at 9:19 PM to the regular meeting of October 17, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community
Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was
unanimously carried.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
Minutes\l O%12%95 -4- 10117/95
MINUTES .OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD OCTOBER 17, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:00 PM at the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor
Jeffrey E. Stone presiding.
PRESENT 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberrs,
Stone
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City
Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Reverend James Egea, Church of Religious Science of Temecula
Valley.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Steve Temple, Finance Director of the City of Hemet, presented the GFOA Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report Award for the Fiscal Year Ending 6/30/94 to Mayor Stone.
Mayor Stone proclaimed October 23-31, 1995 as "Red Ribbon Week." Marge Bornyasz, of
the Temecula Valley Community Partnership thanked the Mayor and City Council and
encouraged all citizens to participate in tobacco, alcohol and other drug prevention efforts.
Mayor Stone proclaimed October 20th through 22nd as "Help K. of C. Help Kids" Weekend.
Bill Mauter of the Knights of Columbus thanked the Mayor and City Council for the
proclamation and encouraged the community to support the fund raising efforts of the Knights
of Columbus to benefit children with learning disabilities.
Mayor Stone proclaimed the Month of November as "Shop Temecula First" month and
presented Chairperson Diana Camba with the proclamation. Ms. Camba thanked the Mayor
and City Council and presented "Shop Temecula First" buttons to the City Council and staff.
Minutes~l 0\17~95 -1 - 11/06195
City Council Minutes October 17, 1995
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Patti Drew, 45680 Muirfield Drive, representing the Temecula Valley Playhouse, invited the
City Council and the public to attend this year's season, beginning with the November 3rd
opening of "Love Letters." She announced a portion of the ticket price will go to the library
if a library card is shown.
Ken Bruckman, 42244 Cosmic Drive, President of the Starlight Ridge Homeowner's
Association, requested the City expedite a policy for traffic control. Public Works Director Joe
Kicak stated this will be on the City Council Agenda on November 14, 1995.
Donald Maston, 42176 Cosmic Drive, addressed the need for traffic control through the
Starlight Ridge tract.
Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, concurred with previous speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans responded to a request from Councilmembers Roberts and Birdsall
regarding reinstating bus service to Heritage Mobile Home Park. He reported that a survey
was done by RTA which showed there are not enough riders to support a bus stop in this
area. He reported he spoke with Susan Haffner of RTA and she stated that riders over 65
years of age would be eligible to use the dial-a-ride system.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans suggested that the City Council consider annexation of the entire
sphere of influence at one time.,
Councilmember Birdsall asked that staff pause before speaking at Council Meetings to allow
time for their microphones to be switched on.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Birdsall announced an abstention on Item No. 2.
Mayor Stone requested the removal of Item No. 7.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-6 and 8-13 with Councilmember Birdsall abstaining on Item No. 2.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
Minutes~ 10\17\95 -2o 11/O6/95
City Council Minutes October 17.1995
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1,1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
2.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberts, Stone
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Destruction of Records Reauest
3.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
City Treasurer's Report as of Auaust 31.1995
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 1995.
Purchase of Vehicle for Buildina and Safety
5.1 Approve the purchase of a 1996 Chevrolet 2-wheel drive pick-up truck for the
Building and Safety Department from Paradise Chevrolet of Temecula in the
amount of $15,684.29.
Minutes%10%17\95 -3- 11/06/95
City Council Minutes October 17. 1995
Release Labor & Material Bond for Tract No. 19872-F CaD Paving
(Located West of Via Gilberto and South of Pala Road)
6.1 Authorize release of Labor and Material Bond for construction of cap paving for
Tract 19872-F;
6.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
"Stoo" Control on Southbound Butterfield StaQe Road at Rancho California Road
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "STOP SIGNS"
"No ParkinQ" Zone on the South Side of Winchester Road, West of Enterprise Circle
South (East)
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-88
A RESOLUTION 'OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING A "NO PARKING" ZONE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD FROM ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH (EAST) TO 200' TO
THE WEST
10.
Designation of Econo~nic Development Zones
10. 1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DESIGNATING VARIOUS AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
Minutes\l 0\17\95 -4- 11/06/95
City Council Minutes October 17, 1995
11.
Redistribution of Sales Tax
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
SUPPORTING THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES' RESOLUTION ON SALES
TAX REDISTRIBUTION TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT RECEIVED BY CITIES TO
2%.
12.
13.
School Mitiaation Fees - Contract Amendment
12.1 Approve a contract amendment, for
review of school mitigation fees.
Out-of-Town Travel Plans
13.1
13.2
$6,820, to the DMG contract for the
Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans.
Authorize out-of-state travel plans for meeting with Federal Officials regarding
Murrieta Creek.
Contract Amendment No. I - Increase the Total Control Amount for Project PW94-20
Mayor Stone stated it appears the cost per square foot has increased and asked how
much work will be redone and why. Public Works Director Kicak explained that since
bids were not received until mid December, the work was done late in the season and
100% of the spraying will need to be redone. He explained this will provide for early
pre-emergency spraying and will actually be the first phase of next year's program.
Mayor Stone asked how long it would take to re-bid this project. Public Works Director
Kicak answered this could be accomplished by the second meeting in November.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve staff recommendation.
The motion failed by the following vote:
AYES:
2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts, Stone
ABSENT: I
COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
Minutes\l 0\17\95 -5- 11/06195
City Council Minutes October 17. 1995
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to
direct staff to readvertise for bids on this project. The motion was unanimously carried
with Councilmember Parks absent.
RECESS
Mayor Stone called a recess at 7:45 PM to accommodate the scheduled Community Services
District Meeting, 'the Redevelopment Agency Meeting, the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority Meeting and Old Town Westside Improvement Authority.
The meeting was reconvened at 8:14 PM.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
14. Council Committee AssiGnments - Councilmember Parks
City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to
make the following changes in Council Committee Assignments:
Liaison to the Rede~elopment Advisory Committee
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency
Old Town Steering Committee
Public Works/Facilities Committee
Economic Development Committee (Director)
Murrieta Creek Advisory Board
Karel Lindemans
Jeff Stone
Pat Birdsall
Jeff Stone
Ron Roberts
Karel Lindemans
The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Parks absent.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Bradley reported that due to the League of California Cities meeting, the next
Council Meeting will be held November 14, 1995.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
Minutes\l 0%17%95 -6- 11/06/95
City Council MinuTes October 17, 1995
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to adjourn
at 8:26 PM to a meeting on November 14, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with
Councilmember Parks absent.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey Eo Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes\l O\17\95 -7- 11 106195
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RF_,SOLI.VI~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TElVlECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~A DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in
the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are
hereby allowed in the mount of $3,506,519.66
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 14th day of November, 1995.
A'ITF_ST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Re,o,\86 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 14th day of November, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
!~,o~6 2
CI~Y OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
10112/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
10/19/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
10/26/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11102/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/14/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/22/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
10/19/95 TOTAL PAYROLL:
11/02/95 TOTAL PAYROLL:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 11/14/95 COUNCIL MEETING:
$ 123,593.21
157,385.34
82,819.61
339,934.52
1.172,451.68
1,387.419.05
118,851.44
124,064.81
$ 3,506,519.66
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL
1 o0 GAS TAX
110 RANCHO CALIF ROAD REIMB DIST
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST.
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
310 VEHICLES
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
$ 1,050,173.6o
33,961.03
0,00
0.00
0.00
5,632.80
135, 172.93
13,734.13
22,526.68
33,491.22
518.94
1,874,163.68
0.00
31,056.44
22,537.28
0.00
11,970.94
9,853.74
18,810.00
0.00
0.00
3,263,603.41
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL
100 GAS TAX
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCS D
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
$ 151,6~o.00
26,396.83
912.67
42,943.49
1,340.09
1,293.04
5,028.42
794.94
2,962.32
1.190.83
2.553.98
1.485.60
4,324.04
242,916.25
TOTAL BY FUND:
GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER ~
$ 3,506,519.66
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
11~L12/95
15:37
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LQt4/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
19,398.28
2t528.97
32.98
28,691.20
7,848.26
21,703.27
3,553.71
29.74
31,620.24
148.09
3,001.53
3,549.15
823.23
123,593.21
VOUCHRE2
1 O/12/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
25842
25843
25844
25845
25846
25849
25849
25850
25850
25850
25851
25851
25852
25853
25853
25853
25854
25854
25854
25855
25856
25857
25857
25858
25858
25858
25859
25859
25859
25860
25861
25862
15:37
CHECK
DATE
10/11/95
10/11/95
10/11/95
10/11/95
10/11/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
VENDOR VENDOR
· NUMBER NAME
001578 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF PARK
001578 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF PARK
001578' CALIFORNIA DEPT OF PARK
001578 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF PARK
001578 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF PARK
001985 A E P (ASSOC OF ENVIRO
001985 A E P (ASSOC OF ENVIRO
001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR &
001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR &
001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR &
001895 A T & T - VAN NUYS
001895 A T & T - VAN NUYS
AMERICAN UNITED CONSTRU
001910 AMERITECH COMMUNICATION
001910 AMERITECH COMMUNICATION
001910 AMERITECH COMMUNICATION
000622 BANTA ELECTR[C-REFRIGER
000622 BANTA ELECTR[C'-REFRIGER
000622 BANTA ELECTR[C-REFRIGER
002085 BARNEY & BARNEY
BITTNER, SUSAN
000679 BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
000679 BOGRAPH[CS PRINTING PLU
000126
000126
000126
001590
001590
001590
000127
002017
O009BO
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN
CALIFORNIAN, INC. -LEGA
CiTY WIDE ELECTRONIC SY
COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ENTRIES FOR STATE AWARDS
ENTRIES FOR STATE AWARDS
ENTRIES FOR STATE AWARDS
ENTRIES FOR STATE AWARDS
ENTRIES FOR STATE AWARDS
AEP MEMBERSHIP FOR D,UBNOSKE
AEP MEMBERSHIP FOR D,UBNOSKE
SUPPLEMENTAL WEED ABATEMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL WEED ABATEMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL WEED ABATEMENT
909 695-3539 GEN USAGE
909 699-2309 GEN USAGE
REFUND:EXPRESS MAIL CHARGES
TONER FOR FAX MACHINE
FREIGHT
TAX
EXHAUST FAN SYSTEM - CRC
HVAC/ELECTRICAL SERVICES
ELECTRICAL SVCS FOR TCSD PARKS
ANNUAL PROPERTY COVERAGE
REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT
RECREATION PRGM RECEIPT BOOKS
TAX
REPAIR MAIN LINE/MAGEE PARK
SANTA GERTRUDIS TRAIL SPRAY
LABOR/MATERIALS/DRAIN CLEANOUT
REFUND-REGISTRATION FEE-MCDERM
CRA RDA COURSE-MCDERMOTT-I/22
INTROD RDA CONF:NAASEH:9/28/95
PUBLIC NOTICES
MONITORING FOR ALARM SYSTEM
IRRIGATION PARTS & EQUIPMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
001-161-501-5226
001-161-502-5226
001-162-999-5440
001-162-999-5440
001-162-999-5440
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-199-4053
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5250
190-180-999-5212
300-199-999-5204
190-2900
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5415
001-140-999-5261
001-140-999-5261
001-161-501-5261
001-161-502-5256
190-181-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
ITEM
AMOUNT
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
40.00
40.00
160.00
300.00
120.00
5.41
5.55
25.00
130.00
3.22
10.08
1,700.00
123.59
222.00
2,990.00
40.00
214.55
16.63
113.37
789.55
70.00
123.25-
490.00
165.00
34.07
105.00
62.33
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
80.00
580.00
10.96
25.00
143.30
2°045.59
2,990.00
40.00
231.18
972.92
531.75
34.07
105.00
62.33
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2
1~"'"'~/95 15:37
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
25863 10/12/95
25864 10/12/95
25864 10/12/95
25864 10/12/95
25864 10/12/95
25865 10/12/95
25866 10/12/95
25867 10/12/95
25868 10/12/95
25869 10/12/95
25869 10/12/95
25870 10/12/95
25871 10/12/95
25871 10/12/95
2 10/12/95
25872 10/12/95
25872 10/12/95
25872 10/12/95
25873 10/12/95
25874 10/12/95
25874 10/12/95
25874 10/12/95
25875 10/12/95
25876 10/12/95
25877 10/12/95
25877 10/12/95
25877 10212/95
25877 10/12/95
25877 10/12/95
25877 10/12/95
25878 10/12/95
25879 10/12/95
25880 10/12/95
VENDOR
' NUMBER
000140
002036
002036
002036
002036
001535
VENDOR
NAME
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
CONSOL]DATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOL]DATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
002074 DATA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
002084 DOAN, SI
000643
000643
FIORENZA, KAREN
FORTNER HARDWARE, INC.
FORTNER HARDWARE, INC.
000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS
001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS
000184
000184
000184
000184
001355
00017'/
000177
000177
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
001343
001407
001835
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN
G T E CALIFORNIA, INC.
GLENN]ES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GRAHAM CONTRACTING
HALL, NANCY LEE
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE~ INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HOWE WELDING & FABRICAT
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
JADOT, VALERIE S
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REISSUE-STEVE CRESSliELL INSURA
REPROGRAPHICS SERVS-CITY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS SERVS-C]TY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS SERVS-C]TY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS SERVS-CITY HALL
VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR/PW
REPAIR CASH REGISTER
PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINT SUPPLIES FOR P W CREW
BEVERAGE SERVICE - CITY HALL
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS - PARKS
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS - PARKS
909 694-6400 GEM USAGE
909 695-3539 GEN USAGE
909 699-0128 GEM USAGE
909 699-2309 GEM USAGE
MNTHY ACCESS CHGS 09/28-10/27
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
REFUND:PLANS NEVER RECIEVED
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNING
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS
COLD WATER PRESSURE WASHER
TAX
MISC RECREATION SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS
REPAIR STENCIL TRUCK PUMP
CRC POOL CHEMICALS
REISSUE CHECK: SALES TAX ASST
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2330
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-5804
100-164-601-5214
001-140-999-5250
190-183-999-5330
190-183-4982
190-180-999-5212
100-164-601-5218
340-199-999-5250
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-110-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-199-4053
190-183-999-5330
340-199-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5212
100-164-601-5215
190-182-999-5212
001-2030
I T EM
AMOUNT
25. O0
13.97
8.60
9.35
8.15
269.08
125.00
556.00
35. O0
46.46
98.70
163.96
82.50
43.10
532.19
37.69
1,031.95
29.21
350.00
8.92
Z.79
101.78
30.00
168. O0
51,37
26.13
1,595.00
123.61
3.81
277.31
97. O0
304.94
200.70
CHECK
AMOUNT
25.00
40.07
269.08
125.00
556.00
35.00
145.16
163.96
125.60
1,631.04
350.00
113.49
30.00
168.00
2,077.23
97.00
304.94
200.70
VOUCHRE2
1 O/12/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
25881
25881
25882
25883
25883
25884
25884
25885
25886
25887
25888
25888
25889
25890
25891
25892
25892
25893
25894
25894
25894
25895
25895
25896
25896
25896
25896
25896
25897
25898
25898
25898
25898
25898
15:37
CHECK
DATE
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/lZ/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
002071
002071
000203
000820
000820
001667
001667
000206
001282
000209
000209
001607
001973
001671
001513
001513
001981
000214
000214
000214
OO1384
001384
001892
001892
001892
001892
001892
000235
000239
000239
000239
000239
000239
VENDOR
NAME
JARVINEN TRAVEL CENTERS
JARVINEN TRAVEL CENTERS
JOBS AVAILABLE, INC.
K R W & ASSOCIATES
K R W & ASSOCIATES
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I
KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, 1NC
KUEHL, JANET
L & M FERTILIZER, INC,
L & M FERTILIZER, INC.
L D D S COMMUNICATIONS,
LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI
LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL S
LIBERTY AUTO CENTER
LIBERTY AUTO CENTER
LINDA GOLDZIMER CONSULT
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MOBILE MODULAR
MOBILE MODULAR
MOBILE MODULAR
MOBILE MODULAR
MOBILE MODULAR
0 C B REPROGRAPHICS, IN
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
[TEN
DESCRIPTION
AIRFAIRE:LEAGUE/CITIES/NAASAH
REIMB, AIRFARE/NAASAH
JOB RECRUITMENT AD
PROF PLAN CHECK SERVS/AUG 95
WORKERS' CONP-FROM SEPT INVOIC
TEMP HELP W/E 8/27 LUJAN
TEMP HELP W/E 9/3 LUJAN
MISC COPY SUPPLIES
MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
PARTS AND EQUIP FOR REPAIRS
PARTS, EQUIP AND REPAIRS
LONG DISTANCE SERVS
LIGHT REPAIRS
HAZ-MAT STORAGE/DISPOSAL
REPA]R/MA]NT, VEHICLE; B&S
VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
CUST SERVICE TRAINING
CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAINING
CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAINING
CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAINING
CONTINUOUS LETTERHEAD RECEIPTS
TAX
LEASE PAYMENT FOR INTERIM FIRE
TAX
LEASE PAYMENT FOR INTERIM FIRE
TAX
INTERIM FIRE STATION
BLUEPRINTS REPROGRAPHICS SERVS
TEMP HELP W/E 7/2 & 7/9 GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 7/2 & 7/9 GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 9/10 GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 9/10 GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 9/10 GRAGE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-501-5258
001-1170
001-150-999-5254
001-163-999-5249
001-1180
190-180-999-5118
190-180-999-5118
330-199-999-5220
190-182-999-5212
190-183-498Z
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5242
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5212
100-164-601-5430
001-162-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
001-150-999-5248
001-162-999-5261
001-161-501-5261
001-161-502-5261
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-171-999-5470
001-171-999-5470
001-171-999-5470
001-171-999-5470
001-171-999-5470
210-190-626-5802
001-161-501-5118
001-161-502-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-161-501-5118
001-161-502-5118
ITEM
AMOUNT
161.00
3.00
50.40
1,712.50
55.61 -
442. O0
442. O0
22.90
51.84
40. O0
167.61
1,441.75
247. O0
299. O0
202.84
154.33
5,521.56
192.00
40.00
120.00
314.40
24.37
905.00
70.14
685. O0
53.09
856.61
832.92
151.20
151.20
194.40
70.88
70.87
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOU N T
164. O0
50.40
1,656.89
884.00
22.90
51.84
40.00
241.36
1,441.75
2~'
299. O0
357.17
5,521.56
352.00
338.77
2,569.84
832.92
67'
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
l~-"~/95 15:37 VOUdHER/CNECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
25899 10/12/95 001561 PAGENET - PAGING METEOR PAGING NETWORK
25899 10/12/95 001561 PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGING NETWORK
25899 10/12/95' 001561 PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGING NETWORK
25899 10/12/95 001561 PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGING NETWORK
25899 10/12/95 001561 PAGENET.- PAGING NETWOR PAGING NETWORK
25899 10/12/95 001561 PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGING NETWORK
25899 10/12/95 001561 PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGING NETWORK
25899 10/12/95 001561 PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGING NETWORK
25899 10/12/95 001561 PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGING NETWORK
fSEPT 95 001-100-999-5250
~SEPT 95 320-199-999-5238
~SEPT 95 001-120-999-5250
FSEPT 95 001-162-999-5250
fSEPT 95 001-163-999-5250
ISEPT 95 100-164-601-5238
ISEPT 95 001-165-999-5238
~SEPT 95 190-180-999-5250
~SEPT 95 001-170-999-5242
15.00
33.56
7.50
30.00
15.00
15.00
7.50
75.00
30.00
228.56
25900 10/12/95 001243 PALMQUIST, MARY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
168.00
168.00
25901 10/12/95 PAULSON, TERRI REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION 190-183-4982
25902 10/12/95 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES/TCSD 190-180-999-5212
25902 10/12/95 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES/TCSD 190-180-999-5212
20.00
6.47
53.08
20.00
59.55
25903 10/12/95 002012 R D 0 EQUIPMENT CO. MISC SUPPLIES FOR TRACTOR 100-164-601-5214
14.01
14.01
25904 10/12/95 000270 R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC AUG PRGSS PMT-PRK VIEW SITE
25904 10/12/95 000270 R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC AUG PRGSS PMT-PRK VIEW SITE
210-190-138-5802
210-190-138-5802
2,430.00
1,575.00-
855.0O
~5 10/12/95 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
J5 10/12/95 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION
330-199-999-5220
001-163-999-5268
21.55
23.47
45.02
25906
25906
25906
25906
25906
25906
25906
25906
25906
10/12/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER SERVS-VIA REINA/LSCP 193-180-999-5240
10/12/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER SERVS-CAMINO MERANO/LSCP 193-180-999-5240
10/12/95 000262 -RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER SERV-FRONT ST/CITY YARD 100-164-601-5240
10/12/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS LOCATIONS-WATER SERVS 190-180-999-5240
10/12/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS LOCATIONS-WATER SERVS 190-181-999-5240
10/12/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS LOCATIONS-WATER SERVS 190-182-999-5240
10/12/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS LOCATIONS~WATER SERVS 191-180-999-5240
10/12/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS LOCATIONS-WATER SERVS 193-180-999-5240
10/12/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS LOCATIONS-WATER SERVS 340-199-999-5240
218.21
217.07
16.74
4,658.65
147.05
2,266.56
158.62
2,882.57
10.60
10,576.07
25907
25907
25907
25907
10/12/95 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS 190-180-999-5212
10/12/95 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-999-5212
10/12/95 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS 190-180-999-5212
10/12/95 000426 RANCHO iNDUSTRIAL SUPPL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-999-5212
119.62
44,80
124.13
6.50
295.05
25908 10/12/95 001680 RAY GRAGE AND ASSOCIATE SEPT PLAN CHECK SERVS
001-162-999-5248
438.10
438.10
25909 10/12/95 001942 S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST POSTING FOR SIGNS
25909 10/12/95 001942 S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST POSTING FOR SIGNS
001-161-501-5256
001-161-501-5256
520.00
325.00
845.00
25910
25910
25910
25910
25910
"~10
10/12/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263
10/12/95 000704 S K S# INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 100-164-601-5263
10/12/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-999-5263
10/12/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-163-999-5263
10/12/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263
10/12/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262
68.63
345.59
64.27
107.28
41.07
770.17
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 5
10/12/95 15:37
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
25911
25911
25912
25912
25913
25914
25914
25914
25914
25914
25914
25915
25916
25916
25917
25917
25917
25917
25917
25917
25917
25917
25917
25917
25917
25917
25917
25917
25918
25919
25920
25921
25921
25921
25921
25922
25922
25923
CHECK
DATE
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
1'0/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
002041
002041
002047
002047.
000519
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000375
001696
001696
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
001546
001497
001672
002065
002065
002065
002065
000326
000326
VENDOR
NAME
SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING
SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING
SOIL TECH INC
SOIL TECH INC
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDXSON '
SOUTHERN CALXF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
STAPLES OFFICE SUPPLY
STAPLES OFFICE SUPPLY
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI-
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCl
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUNO - SAN FRA~CI
STRAIGHT LINE GLASS
T R W,INC.-INFORMATION
TEMECULA DRAIN SERVICE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNITOG RENTA~ SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
VANDEHEI, MELISSA
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
CONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS RAMPS
RETENTION:CONST ACCESS RAMP
PARKVIEW ROUGH GRADING
PROF SERVS CONTRACT/PARKVIEW
PEST CONTROL SERVICES - CITY
VARIOUS ELECT SERVS
VARIOUS ELECT SERVS
VARIOUS ELECT SERVS
VARIOUS ELECT SERVS
VARIOUS ELECT SERVS
VARIOUS ELECT SERVS
909 312-0474 EOC
CATALOG CASES FOR TEN POLICE
TAX
WORKERS~ CONP- SE~T 1995
WORKERS~ CONP- SEPT 1995
WORKERS' CONP' SEPT 1995
WORKERS' COMP' SEPT 1995
WORKERS' CONP- SEPT 1995
WORKERSt CONP- SEPT 1995
WORKERS~ CONP- SEPT 1995
WORKERS' CONP- SEPT 1995
WORKERSt CONP- SEPT 1995
WORKERS~ CONP- SEPT 1995
WORKERS~ CONP- SEPT 1995
WORKERS~ COMP- SEPT 1995
WORKERS~ COMP- SEPT 1995
WORKERS~ CONP- SEPT 1995
CRC DOOR REPAIRS
CREDIT REPTS FOR RDA LOANS
PLUMBING SERVICES FOR TCSD
COLORED PAPER 12 REAMS
GREEN PAPER FOR HOLIDAY LIGHTS
TAX
TAX
UNIFORM MAINT/PUBLIC WORKS
UNIFORM MAINT. FOR TCSD
REFUND-SWIMMING REGISTRATION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-190-140-5804
Z10-Z035
210-199-128-5804
210-199-128-5804
340-199-999-5250
191-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
192-180-999-5319
193-180-999-5240
320-199-999-5208
001-170-999-5292
001-170-999-5292
001-2370
100-2370
165-2~70
190-2370
191-2370
192-2370
193-2370
194-2370
280-2370
300-2370
320-2370
330-2370-
340-2370
001-1182
190-182-999-5212
280-199-999-5250
190-180-999-5212
330-199-999-5220
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
100-164-601-5243
190-180-999-5243
190-183-4982
ITEM
AMOUNT
25,200.00
2,520.00-
1,802.50
5,409.75
42.00
25.95
1,906.46
,7,105.28
7,587.22
21,692.13
52.19
47.49
79.98
6.20
4,107.15
1,270.89
32.98
2,006.40
76.47
11.14
183.67
29.74
98.09
11.53
34.35
11.21
310.70
55.61
60.00
50.00
328.00
465.60
330.75
25.63
36.08
24.00
21.35
50.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
22,680.00
7,212.25
42.00
38,369.23
47.49
8,239.93
60.00
50.00
328.00
858.06
45.35
50.00
VOUCHRE2
lo-,-~/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
25924
25925
25925
25925
25925
25926
25927
15:37
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
10/12/95
WAKOSKI, NOELLE
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
001342, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
YELLOW PAGES, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 6
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION' 190-183-4982
BLDG. MAINT. SUPPLIES-CITY
BLDG. MAINT. SUPPLIES-SENIOR
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES/CITY BALL
TAX
CA CODE PUBLICATIONS
340-199-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
001-120-999-5228
190-180-999-5250
35.00
193.30
519.41
73.28
5.68
92.20
147.00
YELLOW PAGE AD FOR CRC
35.00
791.67
92.20
147.00
TOTAL CHECKS
123,593.21
VOUCHRE2
13:38
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LO~/HOD SET ASIDE
190 COMHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
ZlO CAPITAL INPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORHATION SYSTEHS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
72,773.08
7,888.07
2,137.73
14,352.22
646.73
315.98
1,934.05
-187.69
50,050.78
6Z8.69
69Z.59
3,219.24
1,826.31
732.18
157,385.34
VOUCHRE2
1 O/19/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
25928
25929
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
519853
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
562803
13:38
CHECK
DATE
10/17/95
10/18/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000144
001298
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
VENDOR
NAME
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPOR
UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (]RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (]RS)
FIRSTAX C]RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
LUNCH FOR GOLF TOURNAMENT
EXTENSION CLASS:CRESSWELL/FAUL
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 HEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2172
001-163-999-5261
001-2070
190-2070
193-2070
280-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
ITEM
AMOUNT
100.00
450.00
63.74
52.18
6.38
2.67
3,140.02
602.02
9.28
639.95
24.64
9.57
119.59
16.56
29.76
37.89
93.45
22.96
16.92
11,707.53
2,418.63
30.31
2,702.23
113.35
?5.57
469.60
76.17
155.19
128.07
371.27
115.94
140.44
2,717.42
494.02
14.62
746.70
24.82
24.64
95.92
14.56
47.41
22.11
60.7Z
25.32
70.82
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
100.00
450.00
4,887.58
22,863.38
25932 10/19/95 001502 ADVANCE BUSINESS GRAPHI TEMECULA PARKING CITATIONS 001-170-999-5222 890.56
25932 10/19/95 001502 ADVANCE BUSINESS GRAPHI TAX 001-170-999-5222 62.34 952
VOUCHRE2
1 ['~-~/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
25933
25934
25935
25936
25936
25937
25937
25938
25939
25939
25939
25940
25941
25943
25943
25943
25944
25945
25945
25946
25947
25947
25948
25948
25949
25949
25950
25951
25952
13:38
CHECK
DATE
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. 909-204-1200/TH/SEPT
000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC MEMBERSHIP:PLANNING BOARD
001149 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIV MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:SPAGNOLO
001947 AMERIGAS
001947 AMERIGAS
ARADANAS, ROD
ARADANAS, ROD
ASSEMBLIES OF GOD
000622 BANTA ELECTR]C-REFRIGER
000622 BANTA ELECTR]C-REFRIGER
000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
002085 BARNEY & BARNEY
BEACH, DEBB1E
000127 CALIFORNIAN° INC. -LEGA
000135 CENTRAL CITIES S]GN SER
000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
001723 CHACON, DAVID
000137 CHEVRON U S A INC.
000137 CHEVRON U S A INC,
001275 CONPUSERVE, INC,
001393 DATA TICKET, INC.
001393 DATA TICKET, INC.
001924 DAVID N. GRIFFITH & ASS
001924 DAVID M. GR]FFITH & ASS
000155 DAVLIN
000155 DAVLIN
000602 DEAN'S PHOTO SERVICE,
001542 DEFABIIS, SEAN-PAUL MIC
000518 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS
002091 DISCOUNT TIRE CENTERS
PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
REFUND CANCELLED RENTAL
REFUND CANCELLED RENTAL
REFUNO-FIELD RESERVATION
ELECT REPAIRS t THE CRC PRKLOT
REPAIR CONDUITS IN SOUND ROOM
INSTALL POOL SLIDE SWITCH
CIGA INS SURCHARGE/9937893-02
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN/SEPT
MISC. HARDWARE FOR SIGNS
MISC, HARDWARE FOR SIGNS
MISC. HARDWARE FOR SIGNS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
COMPUTER INFORMATION SRVS/SEPT
PRKING CITATION PROCESS SERVS
PRKING CITATION PROCESS SERVS
SCHOOL IMPACT FEES STUDY
CREDIT INVOICE EXCEEDS CONTRCT
BROADCASTING OF COUNCIL MTGS.
BROADCASTING OF COUNCIL NTGS.
HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL PICTURES
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
VET CHARGES POLICE K-9
TIRES FOR CITY VEHICLES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-199-999-5208
001-161-502-5226
001-165-999-5226
001-162-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
190-2900
190-183-4990
190-2900
190-180-999-5212
190-182-~-5Z50
190-182-999-5250
300-199-999-5204
190-183-4982
001-120-999-5256
i00-16~-601-5244
100-164-601-5244
100-164-601-5244
190-183-999-5330
001-161-501-5262
190-180-999-5263
320-199-999-5228
001-140-999-5250
001-170-999-5250
001-140-999-5248
001-140-9~9-5248
001-100-999-5250
001-100-999-5250
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5330
001-170-999-5327
100-164-601-5214
ITEM
AMOUNT
66.07
280. O0
165.00
240.60
240.14
100.00
154.00
100.00
63.39
51.68
92.50
344.12
20.00
196.70
122.19
26.94
24.24
180.00
11.59
106.63
10.00
4,850.11
734.93 -
800.00
792.46
107.10
400. O0
20.75
112.93
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
66.07
280.00
165.00
480.74
254.00
100.00
207.57
344.12
20.00
196.70
173.37
180,00
118.22
10,00
151,50
4,115.18
1,592.46
107.10
400.00
20.75
112.93
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 3
10/19/95 13:38 ""--
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
25954
25955
25955
25955
25955
25955
25956
25956
25956
25957
25958
25958
25959
25959
25960
25961
25962
25963
25964
25964
25965
25966
25967
25967
25967
25967
25968
25969
25970
25971
25971
25972
CHECK
DATE
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000523
001977
001977
001977
001977
001977
000165
000165
000165
001002
001103
001103
000184
000184
000177
001609
000186
000186
001517
000194
000194
000194
000194
002090
001340
001407
000199
000199
001186
VENDOR
NAME
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
EASTERN POLICE SUPPLY
EASTERN POLICE SUPPLY
EASTERN POLICE SUPPLY
EASTERN POLICE SUPPLY
EASTERN POLICE SUPPLY
FEDERAL EXPRESSt INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FREEDOI4 MATERIALS
FREEDOM MATERIALS
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GREATER ALARM COMPANY,
GUST, KATHY
HAMAMOTO, AILEEN
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HARLEY OWNERS GROUP
HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
INDUSTRIAL SCIENTIFIC C
INNOVATIVE IMAGES
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
IRWIN, JOHN
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
95366-02 DIEGO DR LDSCP
RED TRAINING GUNS-POLICE DEPT
RED TRAINING GUNS-POLICE DEPT
RED TRAINING GUNS-POLICE DEPT
RED TRAINING GUN-POLICE DEPT
TAX
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
5473-6664-0391-O057/SN-SEPT
CONSTRUCTXON MATERIALS - PARKS
SAW RENTAL FOR TCSD NAINT
909-694-1211/POLICE DEPT
909-699-8632/GENERAL USE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ALARM MONITORING - STORAGE
REFUND:CANCELLED CLASS
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL SUPPLIES
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
REFUND-OVRPMT PA95-0067
EMPLOYEE ASSIST PROGRAM SERVS
000194 DEF CONP
000194 DEF CONP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
STENCIL TRUCK GAS DETECTOR REP
CITY FLOAT RESTORATION
CRC POOL CHEMICALS
000199 ZRS GARN
000199 IRS GARN
TCSD iNSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
193-180-999-5240
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
210-199-650-5804
001-162-999-5230
001-161-502-5230
001-100-999-5260
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5220
340-199-999-5250
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
190-183-999-5370
001-171-999-5470
001-2660
001-150-999-5250
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
192-2080
100-164-601-5215
001-100-999-5214
190-182-999-5212
001-2140
100-2140
190-183-999-5330
ITEM
AMOUNT
344.75
32.52
32.52
32,53
32.53
5.18
9.50
25.84
23.97
332.15
65.73
19.40
269.40
27.38
39.72
35.00
20.00
14.00
40.00
51.56
83.00
338.35
937.89
86.45
452.78
100.00
89.25
860.00
182.10
143.36
143.34
201.60
CHECK
AMOUNT
344.73
135.28
59.31
332.15
85.13
296.78
39.72
3F
20.00
14.00
91.56
83.00
338.35
1,577.12
89.25
860.00
182.10
286.70
201.60
VOUCHRE2
lC~u9/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
259~3
25973
25973
25973
25973
25973
25974
25973
25975
25973
25975
25975
25976
25977
25977
25978
~9
25980
25980
25981
25981
25981
25982
25982
25982
25982
25982
25983
25983
25984
25985
25985
25985
25985
25986
25986
13:38
CHECK
DATE
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19195
VENDOR
NUMBER
001667
001667
001667
001667
001667
001667
000205
000206
000206
000206
000206
000206
000209
001982
001982
000414
000653
001967
001967
000219
000219
000219
002046
002046
002046
002046
002046
000220
000220
001905
000226
000226
000226
000226
001384
00138~
000228
VENDOR
NAME
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KIDS PARTIES, ETC.
KINKO~S OF RIVERSIDE,
KINKO~S OF RIVERSIDEw
KINKO~S OF RIVERSIDE,
KINKO~S OF RIVERSIDE,
KINKO~S OF RIVERSIDE,
L & M FERTILIZER, INC.,
L WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE,
L WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, I
LONGS DRUG STORE
LUCKY STORE, INC.
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
MASTER K 9 INC
MASTER K 9 INC
MASTER K 9 INC
MASTER K 9 INC
MASTER K 9 INC
MAUR1CE PRINTERS, INC.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MOBIL, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP W/E 10/1 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/1 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/1 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/8 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/8 EVANS
TENP HELP W/E 10/8 EVANS
HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL SUPPLIES
PRINTING/SUPPLIES/TCSD
MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES
MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES
COPIES FOR PLANNING
CREDIT: RECREATION SUPPLIES
MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
LDSCP MAINT & TREE REPLACEMNTS
REMOVE HATJi~RDOUS TREES & TRIM
FILM PURCHASE AND PROCESSING
SUPPLIES-COOKIE MONSTER CLASS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/1LIPOSCHAK
TEMP HELP W/E 10/8 LIPOSCHAK
PHOTO DEVELOPING ClP DIVISION
PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR TRAFFIC
PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR P.W.
3' NYLON LEASH FOR K'9 UNIT
6' NYLON LEASH FOR K-9 UNIT
12I' TRAFFIC LEAD FOR K'9 UNIT
UNDERCOVER SLEEVE FOR K-9 UNIT
TAX
NEIGHBORHC300 WATCH NEWSLETTER
TAX
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
HP OFFICEJET FAX/COPIER/PRINT
TAX
HP OFFICEJET FAX/COPIER/PRINT
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS/H R JOB HOTLINE
TAX
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-165-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
100-164-604-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
100-164-604-5118
190-183-999-5370
190-182-999-5301
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
001-161-501-5222
190-180-999-5222
100-164-601-5218
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5250
190-183-999-5320
100-164-601-5118
100-164-601-5118
001-165-999-5250
100-164-602-5250
100-16z,-601-5Z50
001-170-999-5327
001-170-999-5327
001-170-999-5327
001-170-999-5327
001-170-999-5327
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
190-183-999-5330
320-1970
320-1970
320-1970
320-1970
001-150-999-5222
001-150-999-5222
001-161-501-5262
ITEM
AMOUNT
97.07
97.07
97.06
48.53
48.53
48.54
105.00
27.69
106.40
90.45
160.01
106.40-
3.74
230. O0
200. O0
9.36
30.00
380.64
380.64
34.34
12.82
20.24
15.00
18.00
10.00
89.95
10.31
317.00
24.57
512.00
616.00
47.74
616.00
47.74
38.25
2.96
14.04
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
436.80
105.00
278.15
3.74
430.00
9.36
30,00
761.28
67.40
143.26
341.57
512.00
1,327.48
41.21
14.04
VOUCHRE2
10/19/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
25988
25988
25988
25988
25988
25988
25988
13:38
CHECK
DATE
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001654
001654
001654
001654
001654'
001654
001654
VENDOR
NAME
MONTEREY SYSTEMS~ XNC.
MONTEREY SYSTEMS, IN(,
MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC.
MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC.
MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC.
MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC.
MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MICROFILM
MASTER APERTURE CARD
DUPLICATE APERTURE CARD
FILM PROCESSING
ROLL MICROFILM
MSI STAFF PICK UP DELIVERY
TAX
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 !0/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
25989 10/19/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
001958
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
25990
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
001958 PERS L-T
PETTY CASH REIMBURESMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURESMENT
PETTY CASH REINBURESMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURESMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURESMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURESMENT
PETTY CASH RE]MBURESMENT
PETTY CASH RE]MBURESMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURESNENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURESNENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
330-199-999-5277
330-199-999-5277
330-199-999-5277
330-199-999-5277
330-199-999-5277
330-199-999-5277
330-199-999-5277
001-2130
100-2130
001-2390
100-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2~90
193-Z390
194-2390
280-2~90
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2390
100-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
100-2122
300-199-999-5262
300-199-999-5261
001-100-999-5260
190-183-999-5320
001-110-999-5260
190-183-999-5320
001-110-999-5260
001-150-999-5260
001-161-501-5260
001-161-501-5260
001-100-999-5260
001-150-999-5261
ITEM
AMOUNT
11.40
41.04
28.50
3.50
16.00
15.00
8.08
191.62
65.18
12,955.40
2,390.40
82.54
2,972.79
111.96
105.27
373.94
75.17
226.21
105.14
282.54
109.73
343.91
56.34
9.71
.23
12.56
.47
.93
1.39
.23
.78
.46
.93
.93
2.09
51.70
34.80
15.00
20.00
15.20
24.00
14.55
25.00
24.00
25.00
.60
20.00
9.65
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
123.52
20,478.85
51.70
VOUCHRE2
13:38
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
~UMBER
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25991
25992
25992
25992
25993
25994
25994
25994
25994
25994
?.~995
)6
25996
25997
25998
25999
25999
25999
26000
26001
26002
26002
26003
26004
26005
26006
26006
26006
"q06
CHECK VENDOR
DATE ' NUMBER
10/19/95 000249
10/19/95 000249
10/19/95 000249
10/19/95 000249
10/19/95 000249
10/19/95 000249
10/19/95 000249
10/19/95 000249
10/19/95 000580
10/19/95 000580
10/19/95 000580
10/19/95 000254
10/19/95 001938
10/19/95 001938
10/19/95 001938
10/19/95 001938
10/19/95 001938
10/19/95 000255
10/19/95 000947
10/19/95 000947
10/19/95 002073
10/19/95 001046
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95 000266
10/19/95 000268
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95 000278
10/19/95 001889
10/19/95 001888
10/19/95 000537
10/19/95 000537
10/19/95 000537
10/19/95 000537
VENDOR
NAME
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PHOTO WC)RKS
PHOTO 140RKS
PHOTO WORKS
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRICE, JOAN F.
PRICE, JOAN F.
PRICE, JOAN F.
PRICE, JOAN F.
PRICE, JOAN F.
PRO LOCK & KEY
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RESOURCE GROUP, THE
REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET
RHODES, GEORGANNE
RHOOES~ GEORGANNE
RHODES, GEORGANNE
RIGHTWAY
RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT
ROBUCK, PHYLLIS
ROBUCK, PHYLLIS
SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE
SHAFER, ALICIA
SHAFER, AMBER DAWN
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON -
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
· PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
FILM, SLIDES AND PICTURES
FILM, SLIDES AND PICTURES
FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING
RECRUITEMENT ADVERTISING-SEPT
MINUTE CLERK/TRAFFIC COMNMTG
MINUTE CLERK/CITY COUNCIL MTG
MINUTE CLERK/PLANNING CONM MTG
MINUTE CLERK/PLANNING CONM MTG
MINUTE CLERK/OLD TC)~N CONM MTG
LOCKSMITH SERVICES FOR E.O.C.
PRINTING SERVICES/PLANNING
PRINTING SERVXCES/PLANNING
*CONDUCT A CENSUS IN OLD TOWN
PROF LEGAL SERVICES-SEPT 95
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
PORTABLE TOILET FOR CITY YARD
JULY-SEPT K-RAT FEES
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
JOB RECRUITMENT AD
TCSD INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS
55-77-801-89206-02 ELEC SERVS
56-77-755-0157-01 ELECT SERVS
56-77-755-0169-01WNCHSTR SIGN
56-77-816-6611-02 N GN KRNY
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-164-601-5218
190-183-999-5320
001-100-999-5265
100-164-604-5220
190-180-999-522Z
100-164-604-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-161-501-5260
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
001-171-999-5250
001-150-999-5254
100-164-602-5250
001-120-999-5250
001-161-501-5250
001-161-501-5250
280-199-999-5250
100-164-601-5214
001-161-501-5222
001-161-502-5222
165-199-999-5250
001-130-999-5247
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
100-164-601-5238
001-2300
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
001-150-999-5254
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
193-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
ITEM
AMOUNT
4.73
4.61
50. 05
38.78
11.00
9.00
8.55
20.00
5.53
12.89
11.93
203.69
50.00
50,00
50.00
50.00
100.00
6.47
1.75
1.75
2,000.00
287.50
14.00
14.00
14.00
57.39
25,039.50
14.00
14.00
202.73
86.40
86.40
12.15
213.86
58.63
50.05
CHECK
AMOUNT
374.52
30.35
203.69
300.00
6.47
3.50
2,000.00
287.50
42.00
57.39
25,039.50
28.00
202.73
86.4O
86.40
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
10/19/95 13:38 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 7
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
26006 10/19/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 57-77-565-3111-02 ALTON IRR 193-180-999-5240
26006 10/19/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 57-77-565-6799-02 CALLE MEDUSA 191-180-999-5319
26006 10/19/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 59-77-416-2147-01YNEZ RD PED 191-180-999-5240
32.45
32.45
16.50
416.09
26007 10/19/95 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 07-8274-036-1451-] SR CNTR
26007 10/19/95 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 07-8272-901-5751-9 C.R.C.
190-181-999~5240
190-182-999-5240
24.80
830,47
855.27
26008 10/19/95 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR/MAINT. VEHICLE; B&S 001-162-999-5214
20.99
20.99
26009 10/19/95 000305 TARGET STORE
HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL SUPPLIES 190-18]-999-5320
150.00
150.00
26010 10/19/95 000825 TEMECULA CYCLES
REPAIRS FOR POLICE MOTORCYCLES 001-170-999-5214
106.40
106.40
26011 10/19/95 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERVICE PLUMBING SERVICES FOR TCSD
26011 10/19/95 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERVICE PLUMBING SERVICES FOR TCSD
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
47.00
47.00
94.00
26012 10/19/95
TEMECULA MAYOR~S PRAYER MAYOR'S BREAKFAST NOV. 9,1995 001-110'999'5260
15.00
15.00 .
26013 10/19/95 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. ENGRAVED GLASS COFFEE MUGS 001-100-999-5265
26013 10/19/95 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. ETCHING ON CUPS 001-100-999-5265
26013 10/19/95 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. FREIGHT 001-100-999-5265
26013 10/19/95 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO: TAX 001-100-999-5265
26014 10/19/95 000314 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM DRAW ~5 ST. CATHERINES CHURCH 210-190-808-5804
538.78
120.00
10.50
50.59
14,049.00
719,E,7
14,04~
26015 10/19/95 000668 TIMMY D. PRODUCTIONS HALLOWEEN:WHEEL OF FORTUNE 190-18]-999-5370
25.00
25.00
26016 10/19/95 000319 TOMARK SPORTS
26016 10/19/95 000319 TOMARK SPORTS
26016 10/19/95 000319 TOMARK SPORTS
26016 10/19/95 000319 TOMARK SPORTS
26016 10/19/95 000319 TOMARK SPORTS
26016 10/19/95 000319 TOMARK SPORTS
INC. HOMEPLATE 190-180-999-5301
INC. ANCHOR GROUND STAKES 190-180-999-5301
INC. FOUR-WAY PITCHERS PLATE 190-180-999-5301
INC. ONE PIECE BASES 190-180-999-5301
INC. FREIGHT 190-180-999-5301
INC. TAX 190-180-999-5301
136.00
72.00
152.00
390.00
32.00
58.13
840.13
26017 10/19/95 000420 TRAMS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN SEPT ENG SERVS-WEST BY-PASS
26017 10/19/95 000420 TRAMS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN SEPT ENG SERVS-WEST BY-PASS
210-165-612-5802
210-165-612-5802 ·
45,289.78
9,297.50-
35,992.28
26018 10/19/95 001921 TRANSAHERZCA INFORMAT]O INFORMATION MGMT SERVICES 320-199-999-5211
397.50
397.50
26019 10/19/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 2,185.86
26019 10/19/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 100-2080 110.22
26019 10/19/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 367.85
26019 10/19/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 5.00
26019 10/19/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 44.70
26019 10/19/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 5.00
26019 10/19/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 320-2080 312.50
26019 10/19/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 87.50
3,118.63
26020 10/19/95 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160
26020 10/19/95 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160
26020 10/19/95 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 193-2160
477.98
391.34
47.88
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 8
10/-.~-Q/95 13:38
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26020
26021
26021
26021
26021
26021
26022
26022
26022
26022
26022
26023
26024
26025
26026
2_(L026
!
26027
CHECK
DATE
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
10/19/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000389
'000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
001209
001437
000466
000345
000345
VENDOR
NAME
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000389 PT RETZR
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN 000325 UW
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN 000325 UW
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UN]TOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
VAULT INC., THE
VIRACK, MARYANN
WHITEHEAD, RHONDA
WINDSONG HARMONY CHORUS
WINDSONG HARMONY CHORUS
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
UNIFORM NAINT FOR PUBLIC t,K)RKS
UNIFORM NAINT. FOR TCSD
FLOOR MAT RENTAL 8 CITY HALL
FLOOR MAT RENTAL @ C.R.C.
FLOOR MAT RENTAL 8 SR CENTER
OFF-SITE STORAGE FOR VAULT
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD iNSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REFUND CANCELLED RENTAL
REFUND CANCELLED RENTAL
METER USAGE PER COPY/SEPT
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280-2160
001-2120
100-2120
165-2120
190-2120
280-2120
100-164-601-5243
190-180-999-5243
340-199-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
330-199-999-5277
190-18~-999-5330
190-18~-999-5330
190-2900
190-18~-4990
330-199-999-5239
330-199-999-5239
ITEM
AMC)UNT
20.02
55.50
6.80
.75
17.00
1.95
24.00
21.35
35.50
38.40
25.62
224.74
144,00
160.00
100.00
264.00
1,116.63
86.54
CHECK
AMOUNT
937.22
82.00
144.87
224.74
144.00
160.00
364.00
1,203.17
TOTAL CHECKS 157,385.34
VJ[~HRE2
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
21,743.96
1,205.68
10,007.74
252.23
7,202.21
33,709.51
5,788.65
281.25
2,405.05
223.33
82,819.61
VOUCHRE2
10/26/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26028
26028
26029
26029
26030
26031
26032
26033
26034
26039
26040
26041
26041
26041
26042
26043
26044
26045
26045
26046
26047
26048
26048
26049
26050
26051
26052
26052
26052
26053
14:46
CHECK
DATE
10/23/95
10/23/95
10/23/95
10/23/95
10/24/95
10/23/95
10/23/95
10/23/95
10/24/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000854
000854
002102
002102
000488
000144
002101
002060
002099
000724
000622
001080
001080
001080
002094
001414
000127
000127
002103
000131
000135
000135
001195
001410
001014
001535
001535
001535
000155
VENDOR
NAME
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
BEVERLY HILTON HOTEL
BEVERLY HILTON HOTEL
KNOTT'S BERRY FARM
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPOR
MY BUDDIES PIZZA
EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN
BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PR!
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BILLIARDS & BARSTOOLS
BILLIARDS & BARSTOOLS
BILLIARDS & BARSTOOLS
BLADE-CITIZEN
BONVILLAIN, ANJANETTE
BRADLEY~ RONALD E.
CALIFORNIAN, INC. -LEGA
CALIFORNIAN, INC. -LEGA
CAPIO
CARL WARREN & CO., INC,
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
CITIZEN~S SCHOLARSHIP
COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC,
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
DAVLIN
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ULI SEMINAR:THORNHILL:FORD
ULI SEMINAR:THORNHILL:FORD
HOTEL:ULI SEMNR/THORNHILL/FORD
HOTEL:ULI SEMNR/THORNHILL/FORD
TICKETS;KNOTT'S SCARY FARM
TEAM BUILDING LUNCH-TCSD STAFF
TEAM BLDG LUNCH FOR TCSD STAFF
TEAM BUILDING LUNCH-TCSD STAFF
ADVANCE/ADA RESTROOM UPGRADE
SPORTS PROGRAMS AWARDS
ELECT. SERVS i CRC TEEM ROOM
REFELT TWO POOL TABLES
LABOR
TAX
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:CAL AD
REFUND: ACTIVITY CANCELLATION
'REIMB:[CMA CONF:9/15'20:BRADLE
ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN/AUG
ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN/SEPT
CAPIO MENBERSH]P/YATES
NILTON-8/Z4/95
TENNIS COURT-REGULATION SIGNS
TAX
SR CENTER ALARM MONITORING SER
CSF SCHOLARSHIP FUNDS ~96 GRAD
SiGN REPAIR - RIVERTON PARK
MA[NT & SMOG CHECK-B&S VEHICLE
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIRS: P,W.
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: CIP
RECORDINGS OF PC MEETINGS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-501-5258
001-161-501-5272
001-161-501-5258
001-161-501-5272
190-183-999-5370
190-180-999-5261
190-180-999-5261
190-180-999-5261
280-199-999-5212
190-183o999-5380
190-182-999-5250
190-182-999-5301
190-182-999-5301
190-182-999-5301
001-161-501-5256
190-183-4982
001-110-999-5258
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-110-999-5226
300-199-999-5205
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-5244
190-181-999-5250
001-100-999-5267
190-180-999-5244
001-162-999-5214
100-164-601-5214
001-165-999-5214
001-161-501-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
475.00
475.00
356.05
358.19
1,325.00
100.00
77.15
65.23
5,000.00
328.25
354.58
260.00
200.00
18.20
25.62
40.00
54.13
196.70
238.51
125.00
281.25
300.12
23.26
71.10
'4,000.00
75.00
70.12
368.68
150.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
950.00
714.24
1,325.00
100.00
77.15
65.23
5,000.00
328.25
354.58
47
25.62
40.00
54.13
435.21
125.00
281.25
323.38
71.10
4,000.00
75.00
512.75
VOUCHRE2
!.o-,~6/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26054
26055
26055
26056
26056
26056
26056
26056
26056
26056
26057
26057
26057
26057
26057
26057
26058
i9
j9
26059
26059
26059
26060
26060
26060
26060
26060
26061
26062
26063
26064
26065
26066
26067
26068
14:46
CHECK
DATE
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001380
001380
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
000993
000184
000184
000184
000184
000184
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
001407
000202
002087
001154
VENDOR
NAME
DOWNS, LISA
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERV]C
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. -
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC,
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, ZNC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST iNTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GUYER, SUSI
HAYNES, PATRICE
HEATHCOAT, GINA
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
IVERSON, LISA
J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES
JOHNSTON, JIM
K-MART
KATZ, HOLLIS
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REFUND-SWiMMING REGZSTRATION
TEMP HELP WK 09/2-15 COLE
TEMP HELP WK 9/16-29 COLE
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
5473 6664 0391 0040 PB
5473 6664 0391 0172 RB
5473 6664 0391 0172 RB
5473-66(>4-0391-0123-GT
5473 6664 0391 0131AE
5473 6664 0391 0131AE
BEVERAGE SERVICE - CITY HALL
909-181-1123/GENERAL USAGE
909-694-1993/GENERAL USAGE
909-694-4353/PALA PARK
909-694-4354/PALA PARK
909-695-3564/ALARM SYSTEM
'OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION
REFUND-SWIMMING REGISTRATION
REFUND-SWIMMING REGISTRATION
CRC POOL CHEMICALS/OCT 95
REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION
JULY 95 PROF SERVS:YNEZ RD COR
REFUND-SWIMMING REGISTRATION
HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES/DECORATIONS
REDEV CONF/MCLARNEY NOV 2
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-4975
001-162-999-5250
001-162-999-5250
001-162-999-5230
210-199-650-5804
001-140-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-100-999-5258
001-110-999-5Z58
001-110-999-5260
001-161-502-5258
001-162-999-5260
001-1170
340-199-999-5250
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
190-182-999-5220
190-182-999-5220
190-183-4980
190-183-4975
190-183-4975
190-182-999-5212
190-183-4980
001-1280
190-183-4975
190-183-999-5370
001-110-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
25.00
832.00
832.00
39.95
15.50
19.25
13.50
9.50
25.84
39.44
100.00
1,123.60
34.94
46.64
326.46
202.17
137.14
543.32
1,086.37
28.84
28.88
51.86
138.05
23.95
18.03
27.63
18.40
22.00
25.00
25.00
125.64
22.00
903.44
50.00
127.59
125.00
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
25.00
1,664.00
160.98
1,833.81
137.14
1,739.27
226.06
22.00
25.00
25.00
125.64
22.00
903.44
50.00
127.59
125.00
VOUCHRE2
10/26/95
14:46
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICDS
PAGE 3
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
26070 10/26/95
26070 10/26/95
26070 10/26/95
26071 10/26/95
26072 10/26/95
26072 10/26/95
2607'3 10/26/95
26073 10/26/95
26074 10/26/95
26076 10/26/95
26077 10/26/95
26078 10/26/95
26079 10/26/95
26080 10/26/95
26081 10/26/95
26082 10/26/95
26083 10/26/95
26084 10/26/95
26084 10/26/95
26084 10/26/95
26084 10/26/95
26084 10/26/95
26084 10/26/95
26085 10/25/95
26086 10/26/95
26087 10/26/95
26088 10/26/95
26088 10/26/95
26088 10/26/95
26088 10/26/95
26089 10/26/95
VENDOR VENOOR
NUMBER NAME
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001036 KEMPER REAL ESTATE MANA
000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I
000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I
000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC.
000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC.
000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE
001891 LZNFIELD SCHOOL
001653 MAILER'S SOFTWARE
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MARSHALL, KAREN
001207 MARTIN J. JASKA, INC.
001657 MULTI-PURE CORPORATION
NIEDERECKER, ELISA
002100 OBJECT RADIANCE
000239 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
000239 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
000239 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
000239 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
000239 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
000239 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
001171 ORIENTAL TRADING CO., I
PARK]NSON, JULIE
000580 PHOTO WORKS
000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
001938 PRICE, JOAN F.
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP W/E 10/15 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/15 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/15 EVANS
REIMB % UTILITIES ~ DUCK POND
KINKO'S PRINTING CHARGES
TAX
MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
8 TONER CARTRIDGES W/EXCHANGE
INTERIM FIRE STATION-RENT-NOV
ACCU MAIL SOFTWARE
TEMP HELP W/E 10/15 LIPOSCHAK
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
STOP NOTICE RELEASE OF FUNDS
FILTER FOR KITCHEN FAUCET/CITY
REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TEMP HELP W/E 9/24 GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 9/24 GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 9/24 GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 10/01GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 10/01GRAGE
TEMP HELP ~/E 10/01GRAGE
SUPPLIES - HALLOWEEN EVENTS
REFUND-SWIMMING REGISTRATION
FILM, SLIDES AND PICTURES
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC COMMISSION AD
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC COMMISSION AD
DISPLAY ADS/CAPITAL PROJECTS
DISPLAY AD RDA COMMITTEE
MINUTE CLERK FOR PC/SEPT 95
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-165-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
100-164-604-5118
190-180-999-5240
280-199-999-5220
280-199-999-5Z20
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5Z18
320-199-999-5221
001-171-999-5470
320-199-999-5211
100-164-601-5118
190-183-4975
210-2038
340-199-999-5212
190-183-4982
190-183-999-5330
001-161-501-5118
001-161-502-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-161-501-5118
001-161-502-5118
190-183-999-5370
190-183-4975
190-180-999-5301
001-120-999-5254
001-120-999-5254
001-165-999-5256
001-120-999-5254
001-161-501-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
72.80
72.80
72.80
970.19
407.10
31.55
107.46
41.95
376.64
600.00
221.43
634.40
25.00
32,178.01
43.09
45.00
369.60
75.60
75.60
255.15
194.40
113.40
113.40
505.94
25.00
14.45
33.60
42.00
74.00
126.00
50.0O
CHECK
AMOUNT
218.40
970.19
438.65
149.~1
376.64
600.00
221.43 -
634.40
25.00
32,17
43.09
45.00
369.60
827.55
505.94
25.00
14.45
275.60
VOUCHRE2
1~6/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26089
26089
26090
26091
26091
26091
26092
26092
26092
26093
26094
26094
26094
26094
26095
~6095
96
Z6096
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26097
26098
26099
-'~00
14:46
CHECK
DATE
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001938
001938
000546
000947
000947
000947
000262
000262
000262
000426
000266
000266
000266
000266
000271
000271
000537
000537
0O0375
O00375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
001687
VENDOR
NAME
PRICEt JOAN F.
PRICE, JOAN F.
RADIO SHACK
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RIGHTWAY
RIGHTWAY
RIGHTWAY
RIGHTWAY
ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST &
ROBERT BEIN, WH FROST &
SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON -
SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHQN
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL1F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
STEINBACH0 JANIE
TANGAS, MICHAEL
TEMECULA VALLEY PONY/CO
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MINUTE CLERK FOR PC/SEPT 95
MINUTE CLERK/PUBLIC TRAFFIC
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
BLUEPRINTS REPOGRAPHICS
BLUEPRINTS REPOGRAPHICS
BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION
WATER SERVS
WATER SERVS
WATER SERVS
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
PORTABLE TOILET t VETERAN PRK
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL/PARKS
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL/PARKS
PORTABLE TO]LET RENTAL/PARKS
PROF PLAN CHECK SERVS/AUG 95
ROLLOVER P.O. INVOICE PAID
57-77-780-9950-01NI~OLAS
60-77-411-0600-03 RANCHO VS SP
909 202-4769 JS
909 202-4204 KL
909 202-4763 PB
909 202-4762 RP
909 202-4758 RR
909 202-4770 RB
909-202-4757-JG
909-202-5153/GY
909 202-4767 GT
909 202-4767 GT
909 202-4759 AE
909 202-4765 BB
909 202-4764 BB-PW BLAZER
909 202-4760 JH
909 206-0992 BH
909 202-9876 HP
909 202-4752 SN
909 202-4755 CITY VAN
909-202-4756-E0C
REFUND-SWIMMING REGISTRATION
REFUND-TCSD REGISTRATION
CSF FUNDING/TEN PONY BASEBALL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-501-5250
100-164-602-5250
320-199-999-5221
001-1280
001-1280
001-163-999-5268
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
340-199-999-5212
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
210-165-637-5802
210-165-637-5802
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5240
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
001-120-999-5208
001-150-999-5208
001-161-501-5208
001-161-502-5208
001-162-999-5208
100-164-601-5208
100-164-601-5208
100-164-603-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-183-4975
190-183-4975
001-100-999-5267
ITEM
AMOUNT
50.00
50.00
29.59
24.89
27.58
22.97
2,862.90
102.96
7,202.21
43.10
6Z.89
125.78
62.89
251.55
4,931.00
3,413.00-
132.77
16.50
46.80
47.82
54.79
136.60
64.40
44.88
41,34
95.36
34.40
34.39
3.82-
43,75
88.67
72.53
70.33
56.85
62.42
42.91
38.12
25.00
50.00
3,000.00
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
150.00
29.59
75.44
10,168.07
43.10
503.11
1,518.00
149.27
1,072.54
25.00
50.00
3,000.00
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 5
10/26/95 14:46 ~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26101
26102
26103
26103
26104
26105
CHECK
DATE
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
002104 TEMEKU GOLF COURSE
000320 TO~NE CENTER STATIONERS
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
001342 ~AXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
002092 ~INTER GRAPHICS SOUTH
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
5TH ANNUAL CITY GOLF TOURNAMNT
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
UNIFORMS MA[NT FOR PUBLIC WORK
UNIFORM MA[NT. FOR TCSD
BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
FACADE IHPROVEMENTS/OLD TO~N
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2172
001-163-999-5220
100-164-601-5243
190-180-999-5243
190-182-999-5212
280-199-813-5804
ITEM
AMOUNT
4,487.29
46.93
24.00
21.35
489.54
350.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,487.29
46.93
45.35
489.54
350.00
82,819.61
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 13
1lJ-02/95 13:10
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/NOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
76,466.42
21,204.36
346.42
33,647.14
4,171.33
507.43
2,131.92
301.51
173,787.02
2,165.82
1,034.61
2,797.50
4,341.78
17,031.26
339,934.52
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 1
11/02/95 13:10 -~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
25569
26106
26107
26107
26107
26107
26107
26107
26107
26107
26107
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
518503
555306
555306
555306
555306
555306
555306
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
CHECK
DATE
09/22/95
10/27/95
11/01/95
11/01/95
11/01/95
11/01/95
11/01/95
11/01/95
11/01/95
11/01/95
11/01/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
10/26/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000740
001542
001981
001981
001981
001981
001981
001981
001981
001981
001981
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
0004/+/+
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
001300
001300
001300
001300
001300
001300
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
VENDOR
NAME
PICCA DELl
DEFABIIS, SEAM-PAUL MIC
LINDA GOLDZIMER CONSULT
LINDA GOLDZIMER CONSULT
LINDA GOLDZIMER CONSULT
LINDA GOLDZIMER CONSULT
LINDA GOLDZIMER CONSULT
LINDA GOLDZIMER CONSULT
LINDA GOLDZIMER CONSULT
LINDA GOLDZIMER CONSULT
LINDA GOLDZIMER CONSULT
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT
FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT
FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT
FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT
FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT
FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (]RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
OLD TOWN MTG/LUNCH
REISSUE CK-TCSD INSTRUCTOR
CITYWIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE
CITYWIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE
CITYWIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE
CITYWIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE
CITYWIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE
CITYWIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE
CITYWIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE
CITYWIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE
CITYWIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
3RD QTR UNEMPLOYMNT & TRAIN
3RD QTR UNEMPLOYMNT & TRAIN
3RD QTR UNEMPLOYMNT & TRAIN
3RD QTR UNEMPLOYMNT & TRAIN
3RD QTR UNEMPLOYMNT & TRAIN
3RD QTR UNEMPLOYMNT & TRAIN
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-110-999-5260
190-183-999-5330
001-161-501-5261
001-110-999-5261
001-110-999-5261
001-162-999-5261
100-164-603-5261
190-180-999-5261
001-170-999-5261
001-161-502-5261
100-164-603-5248
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
193-2070
280-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2350
100-2350
190-2350
193-2350
280-2350
300-2350
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
ITEM
AMOUNT
141.07
400.00
535.71
1,071.43
1,071,43
1,071.43
1,000.00
1,071.43
1,071.43
535.72
71.42
65.64
4.14
54.71
6.38
2.67
3,350.66
602.42
9.28
670.95
18.90
9.57
101.29
16.56
31.62
41.47
93.45
22.96
16.92
1,071.69
89.90
2,907.68
20.21
51.97
9.61
12,515.00
2,425.94
30.31
2,869.22
95.57
75.57
420.37
76.17
171.57
134.80
371.27
CHECK
AMOUNT
141.07
400.00
7,500.00
5,119.59
4,151.06
VOUCHRE2
1 ~--""'~/95
13:10
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
566524
26110
26110
26110
26110
26110
2,~110
'0
.0
26110
26110
26110
26111
26111
26111
26111
26111
26111
26111
26112
26113
26114
26115
26115
26116
26116
26117
CHECK
DATE
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11i02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000680
000680
000680
000680
000680
000680
000680
000680
000680
000680
000680
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000110
001910
000474
001323
001323
001943
001943
VENDOR
NAME
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE
AMER]TECH COMMUNICATION
ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
B R W, INC.
B R W, INC.
BOGNACKI, CHRISTINE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
00028,:3 MEDICARE
· 000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDtCARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 NED/CARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
POSTAGE MACHINE SERVICE
MONTHLY COPIER SERVICE-OCT
REMOVAL OF SPLIT TREE
WATER SERVICE -CITY HALL-OCT
BOTTLED WATER FOR CITY YARD
CONTRACT AMEND/MARG/REDHWK/79
PROF SRVCS/MARG/REDHWK SIGNAL
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-100-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-140-9~9-5230
001-150-999-5230
001-161-502-5230
001-161-501-5230
100-164-604-5230
320-199-999-5230
001-2310
100-2310
165-2310
190-2310
280-2310
300-2310
340-2310
330-199-999-5217
330-199-999-5217
100-164-601-5402
340-199-9¢~-5240
100-164-601-5240
210-165-645-5802
210-165-645-5804
190-183-4982
ITEM
AMOUNT
115.94
140.44
2,921.11
502.81
14.62
773.48
22.06
24.64
87.06
14.56
51.75
23.41
60.72
25.32
70.82
2.29
42.62
131.79
101.69
166.14
274.40
268.52
118.48
118.49
199.84
1.19
491.41
91.18
4.18
62.65
5.14
2.44
16.70
450.00
217.18
250.00
136.62
5.5O
980.00
320.41
42.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
24,034.53
1,425.45
673.70
450.00
217.18
250.00
142.12
1,300.41
42.00
.... 18 11/02/95 001087 BRIAN COX MECHANICAL A/C REPAIR FOR FINANCE DEPT, 340-199-999-5212 25.00
VOUCHRE2
11/02/95
13:10
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 3
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26118
26118
26119
26120
26120
26120
26120
26120
26120
26120
26121
26122
26122
26122
26123
26124
26124
26125
26125
CHECK
DATE
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001087
001087
000127
000127
000127
000127
000127
000127
000127
000950
000131
000131
000131
002096
002096
000138
000138
VENDOR
NAME
BRIAR COX MECHANICAL
BRIAR COX MECHANICAL
CALIFORNIA SEXUAL ASSAU
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
INC. -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
INC, -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
CALIFORNIAN, INC.- D1SP
CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
CARY, LINDA
CHIC "N" STATION
CHIC "N" STATION
CITICORP NORTH AMERICA
CITICORP NORTH AMERICA
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
LABOR
LABOR
SURE TECHNIQUES CONF:COOK:11/7
PUBLIC NOTICES
PUBLIC NOTICES
PUBLIC NOTICES
PUBLIC NOTICES
ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN
PUBLIC NOTICES
ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN
RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING
SAVINOVICH JOSE 12/20/94
FEREBEE WILLIAM 02/07/95
AUGUSTINE MICHAEL~ 8/24/95
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
LUNCH FOR EMPLOYEE GOLF TOURN.
TAX
LEASE PMT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM
LEASE PNT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM
26126 11/02/95 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S
26126 11/02/95 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S
26126 11/02/95 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S
26126 11/02/95 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S
26126 11/02/95 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER
26126 11/02/95 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER
26126 11/02/95 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN 000140 CANCER
26126 11/02/95 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER
26126 11/02/95 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
000447.
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CQNTRONIX OF HEMET
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
DA FAMILY SUPPORT
DATA TICKET, INC.
001535
001535
001535
002106
11/02/95
001393
26127
26127
26127
26127
26127
26127
26128
26128
26128
26129
26130
11/02/95
MOBILE RADIO-PW MAINT DIVISION
MOBILE RADIO
ANTENNA KiT
EXTERNAL SPEAKER
LABOR TO INSTALL iN VEHICLE
TAX
VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR
CiTY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
VEHICLE NAINT. & REPAIR
002106 SUPPORT
PARKING CITATIONS BILLING AUG
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
340-199-999-5212
340-199-999-5212
001-170-999-5261
001-161-501-5256
001-161-501-5256
001-161-501-5256
001-161-501-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-501-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-150-999-5254
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
190-183-4982
001-2172
001-2172
320-199-999-5391
320-2800
001-2330
190-2330
001-2330
190-2330
001-2330
100-2330
165-2330
190-2330
280-2330
100-164-601-5610
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5242
001-162-999-5214
100-164-601-5214
001-163-999-5214
190-2140
001-140-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
220.00
165.00-
35.00
27.63
29.82
29.82
29.43
276.45
66.59
650.09
24.40
278.75
128.63
184.38
42.00
690.00
53.48
89.19
1,338.38
39.75
39.75
18.75
162.00
162.87
49.16
6.47
89.64
6.47
1,239.94
882.00
57.05
65.00
150.00
77.81
138.05
183.65
15.95
82.50
71.75
CHECK
AMOUNT
80,00
35.00
1,109.83
24.40
591.76
42.00
1,427.57
574,86
2,471.80
337.65
82.50
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 4
1~-~?/95 13:10
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26130
26131
26131
26131
26131
26131
26132
26133
26133
26133
26134
26134
26134
26134
26135
2_~136
~6
~6
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
CHECK
DATE
11/02/95
11/02/95'
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001393
000156
000156
000156
000156
000156
001714
001669
001669
001669
001945
001945
001945
001945
000478
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
VENDOR
NAME
DATA TICKET, INC.
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTZCARE OF CALIFORNIA
DREAM ENGINEERING, INC.
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO
E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI
E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI
E. A. MENDOZA CORTRACTI
E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI
FAST SIGNS
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
'FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PARKING CITATIONS BILLING AUG
000156 DEN-AH1N
000156 DENT-ADV
000156 DENT[CAR
000156 DENT-REV
000156 DENTICAR
DESIGN ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS
RECYCLED. GRAFFITI PAINT
RECYCLED GRAFF]TI PAINT
RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT
SEPT PRGSS PMT-RANCHO CA SPT P
SEPT PRGSS PMT-RANCHO CA SPT
SEPT PRGSS PMT-RANCHO CA SPT
RETENTION ~/H ]NV 284-03
FABRICATE SIGNS FOR THE CRC
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LIFE INS
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 LTD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-170-999-5250
001-2340
001-1180
001-2340
001-1180
001-2340
210-190-141-5802
100-164-601-5218
100-16~-601-5218
100-16~-601-5218
210-190-137-5804
210-190-137-5804
210-190-137-5804
210-2035
190-182-999-5250
001-2360
100-2360
165-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330-2360
~40-2360
001-2380
100-2380
165-2380
190-2380
191-2380
192-2380
193-2380
194-2380
280-2380
300-2380
320-2380
330-2380
340-Z380
001-2500
100-2500
165-2500
190-2500
ITEM
AMOUNT
71.75
15.00
8.39
8.39
8.39-
8.39
227.00
127.68
99.99
174.50
505,300.00
133,500.00'
181,000.00-
19,080.00'
393.52
492.61
97.30
2.13
114.76
4.25
8.50
12.75
2.12
7.22
4.24
8.50
8.50
19.12
854.41
170.33
5.28
189.00
5.85
6.89
20.31
4.76
14.27
7.08
18.52
6.89
22.83
887.60
179.95
5.59
198.80
CHECK
AMOUNT
143.50
31.78
227.00
402.17
171,720.00
393.52
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 5
11/02/95 13:10 ~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26136
26138
26138
26138
26138
26138
26139
26140
26140
26140
26140
26141
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
26142
CHECK
DATE
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
.11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
1t/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
002002
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000993
000184
000184
00018~
000184
000481
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000t77
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
VENDOR
NAME
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYH
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT-
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
002002 STD
SUPPLIES FOR CITY CLERK DEPT
DAYTIMER REFILLS FOR 1996
DAYTIMER REFILLS FOR 1996
FREIGHT
TAX
BEVERAGE SERVICE - CITY HALL
909 693-0956 GEM USAGE
909 694-4356 KENT HINTERGARDT
909 699-2475/CITY' YARD
909 699-7945 CRC FIRE ALARM
PROF SERVCS MATERIAL TEST-CRC
CREDIT: OFFICE SUPPLIES
CREDIT: OFFICE SUPPLIES
CREDIT: OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPL%ES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RETURNED ORDER - REC'D TWICE
OFFICE SUPPL]ES
OFFICE SUPPL%ES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPL%ES
OFFICE SUPPL]ES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPL%ES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
191-2500
192-2500
193-2500
194-2500
280-2500
300-2500
320-2500
330-2500
340-2500
001-120-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
100-164-604-5220
100-164-604-5220
100-164-604-5220
340-199-999-5250
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
210-190-137-5802
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001o120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
6.19
7.29
21.49
5.04
15.10
7.49
19.59
7.29
24.16
178.22
109.99
329.96
13.20
35.12
110.91
32.77
29.52
30.69
53.41
100.00
538.21-
32.29-
10.24-
36.38
30.60
14.96
6.95
11.00
20.00
10.00
4.00
q3.55
2.36
75.07
107.60
13.49
48.32
12.64
9.93-
34.48
61.78
5.66
49.26
30.02
13.21
8.49
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,494.00
666.49
110.91
146.~,TaP
10
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
lt-~2/95 13:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
26142 11/02/95 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
26142 11/02/95 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
26142 11/02/95 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
26142 11/02/95 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
26142 11/02/95 000177. GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-162-999-5220
001-161-501-5220
001-161-502-5220
001-161-501-5220
001-161-502-5220
181.95
180,65
180,65
76.18
76.17
714.75
26143 11/02/95 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
320-199-999-5221
35.83
35.83
26144 11/02/95 GRANT, KAREN
PEPSI HOT SHOT MUSIC CASSETTE 190-180-999-5301
3,00
3,00
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 ' VL ADVAN 001-2510
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 001-2510
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 100-2510
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 190-2510
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 192-2510
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 340-2510
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VL REVER 001-2510
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 001-2510
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 100-2510
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 190-2510
26145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIF~ 192-2510
~6145 11/02/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 340-2510
222.45
161.80
19.15
32.41
6,00
,69
222.45-
164.20
19.15
32.41
6.00
.69
442.50
,6 11/02/95 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVS FOR PLANNING 001-161-501-5261
26146 11/02/95 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVS FOR PLANNING 001-161-502-5261
450.00
450,00
900.00
26147 11/02/95 HOLIDAY SIGNS HOLIDAY CLOSING SIGNS 001-120-999-5220
19.80
19.80
26148 11/02/95 000194 ] C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,336.55
26148 11/02/95 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 100-2080 86.44
26148 11/02/95 000194 ! C N A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 577.39
26148 11/02/95 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 192-2080 100.00
26148 11/02/95 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 37.37
26149 11/02/95 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212
182.10
2,137.75
182.10
26150 11/02/95 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 134,10
26150 11/02/95 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 100-2140 134.10
268.20
26151 11/02/95 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES PROF SERVS AGRMT LAND DEVEL/EN 001-163-999-5249
26151 11/02/95 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES ~ORKER'S COMP COVERAGE 001-1182
26152 11/02/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 10/1 LUJAN 190-180-999-5118
26152 11/02/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP ~/E 9-10 LUJAN 190-180-999-5118
26152 11/02/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 9/17 LUJAN 190-180-999-5118
26152 11/02/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 9/24 LUJAN 190-180-999-5118
26152 11/02/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 10/8 LUJAN 190-180-999-5118
26152 11/02/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP ~/E 10/15 LUJAN 190-180-999-5118
26152 11/02/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP g/E 10/22 EVANS 001-165-999-5118
26152 11/02/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP ~/E 10/22 EVANS 001-165-999-5118
~'~52 11/02/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 10/22 EVANS 100-164-604-5118
2,387.50
77.52-
442.00
353.60
442.00
442.00
442.00
442.00
97.07
97.07
97.06
2,309.98
VOUCHRE2
11/02/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26152
26153
26153
26153
26154
26155
26155
26156
26157
26158
26159
26160
26160
26160
26160
26160
26160
26161
26161
26161
26161
26162
26162
26162
26162
26163
26163
26164
26165
26165
26165
26165
26165
26165
26165
26165
26165
26165
13:10
CHECK
DATE
11/0Z/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001667
001282
001282
001282
000209
000380
000380
000669
000653
001967
002011
000220
000220
000220
000220
000220
000220
000883
000883
000883
000883
002105
002105
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
VENDOR
NAME
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC
KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC
KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC
L & M FERTILIZER, INC.
LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC.
LAIDLAW TRANSIT, iNC.
LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES
LUCKY STORE, INC.
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MARTIN, KATHY
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MORTON, EVONE
MORTON, EVONE
MORTON, EVONE
MORTON, EVONE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
PERKINS, PAM
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP W/E 10/22 LUJAN
REPLACE CHEM FEED LINES/CRC
LABOR
TAX
PARTS, EQUIP AND REPAIRS
CHARTERED BUS SERVICES
P U C FEE
CITY CLERKS SEMINAR:J.GREEK
COOKIE MONSTER CLASS SUPPLIES
TEMP HELP W/E 10/22 LIPOSCHAK
TCSD iNSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ARTWORK FOR T SHIRTS
OPERATING BUDGET COVER
DESIGN & TYPE
COMBS W/SPINE PRINT
BLANK PAPER SHEETS (1000 PER)
TAX
MARGARITA ROAD WORK
CLEAR DRAINAGE-SANTIAGO RD
IMPROVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
IMPROVE DRAINAGE ON YNEZ RD
REFUND-CANCEL BUILDING PERMIT
REFUND-CANCEL BUILDING PERMIT
REFUND-CANCEL BUILDING PERMIT
REFUND-CANCEL BUILDING PERMIT
VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR
REFUND-TCSD SPECIAL EVENT
000246 PER REDE
000246 PER REDE
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
ACCOONT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5118
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5242
190-183-999-5350
190-183-999-5350
001-120-999-5258
190-183-999-5320
100-164-601-5118
190-183-999-5330
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
100-164-601-5401
100-164-601-5401
100-164-601-5401
100-164-601-5401
001-2290
00t-162-4200
001-162-4285
001-162-4285
001-165-999-5214
001-163-999-5214
190-183-4992
001-2130
100-2130
001:2390
100-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
ITEM
AMOUNT
442.00
608.40
224.00
47.15
16.29
382.42
3.82
200.00
30.00
634.40
520.00
16.16
504,00
300,00
215.26
408.00
110.61
1,000.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
1,000.00
.50
27.00
36.00
30.00
60.86
356.82
28.00
191.61
65.19
12,811.71
2,395.51
82.54
2,959.58
97.59
105.27
328.00
75.17
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,296.80
879.55
16.29
386.24
200.00
30.00
634.40
520.00
1,554.0~
5,000.00
93.50
417.68
28.00
VOUCHRE2
1~?/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13:10
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE- 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26165 11/02/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
S6 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
~6 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH 1NSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
~66 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2390
100-2390
165-?.390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2090
100-2090
165-2090
280-2090
001-2090
100-2090
300-2090
001-2090
100-2090
190-2090
193-2090
280-2090
330-2090
340-2090
001-2090
100-2090
190-2090
340'2090
001-2090
100-2090
190-2090
192-2090
194-2090
001-2090
100-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
100-2090
001-2090
165-2090
280-2090
ITEM
AMOUNT
226.18
111.89
282.54
109.73
339.27
49.27
10.64
.23
12.56
.47
.93
1.39
.23
.78
.46
.93
.93
2.09
615.43
39.21
57.49
57.49
451.66
122.47
38.27
4,302.62
1,234.83
1,853.27
296.00
96.40
148.00
381.12
753.96
950.59
349.60
65.24
990.45
381.39
619.24
156.77
101.90
'2,403.23
38.40
958.84
95.96
1,258.70
470.01
212.60
44.21
44.21
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
20,262.69
VOUCHRE2
11/02/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13:10
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH 1NSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS CHEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS CHEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV
26166 11/02/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE
26166 11/02/95 OOO245 PERS CHEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE
26167 11/02/95 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T
26168
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
26169
001707
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000580
002009
002009
000253
000253
000253
26171
PETCO AN]HAL SUPPLIES,
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PHOTO I,~ORKS
POOR SPORTS TEAM SALES
POOR SPORTS TEAM SALES
POSTHASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
26172
26172
26173
26173
26173
K-9 FOOD/SUPPLIES
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH~REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH RE]HBURSENENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
FILM PROCESSING
SOFTBALLS/TCSD
TAX
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-Z090
100-2090
190-2090
280-2090
340-2090
100-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
100-2090
001-2090
100-2090
001-2090
001-2090
100-2090
100-2122
001-170-999-5327
280-199-999-5260
001-162-999-5260
001-140-999-5262
001-165-999-5262
001-150-999-5262
100-164-604-5220
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
190-180-999-5220
001-161-501-5260
001-161-502-5260
001-2172
190-180-999-5261
190-180-999-5260
100-164-604-5220
190-183-999-5350 -
190-183-999-5320
001-100-999-5258
001-110-999-5260
190-183-c~9-5320
001-150-<~9-5260
001-150-999-5265
190-180-999-5301
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
001-120-~<~-5230
100-164-604-5230
001-161-501-5230
ITEM
AMOUNT
181.78
8.37
41.13
96.00
3.68
3.90
104.32
34.77
37.72
26.21
66.98
2.39
943.56-
17.05
18.24
51.70
59.91
30.00
12.00
81.60
24.60
17.70
47.26
10.00
30.00
6.36
12.50
12.50
21.40
27.67
23.44
24.73
6.00
35.23
30.00
32.50
42.78
41.00
15.40
32.09
675.65
47.30
75.25
26.85
10.75
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
19,288.54
51.70 ,
59.91
584.67
32.09
722.95
117
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11-z,D~/95 13:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 10
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
26174 11/02/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM
26174 11/02/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPN
26174 11/02/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM
26174 11/02/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPN
26174 11/02/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM
26174 11/02/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM
26174 11/02/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM
26174 11/02/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM
26174 11/02/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. COBRA PAYMENT FOR 11/95
001-2340
100-2340
165-2340
190-2340
280-2340
300-2340
330-2340
340-2340
001-1180
26175 11/02/95 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVICES 190-180-999-5212
1,492,17
487.59
14.59
343.45
14.58
14,58
22.11
72.92
7.99
45.00
2,469.98
45.00
26176 11/02/95 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C MISCELLANOUS BLUEPRINT
26177 11/02/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 02-79-10100-1 WATER SERVS
001-165-999-5222
190-180-999-5240
22.90
151.44
22.90
151.44
26178 11/02/95 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE WASH & DETAIL SER 001-163-999-5214
26178 11/02/95 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE WASH & OETAIL SER 001-165-999-5214
26178 11/02/95 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE WASH & OETAIL SER 001-162-999-5214
26178 11/02/95 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE WASH & OETAIL SER 001-110-999-5214
26178 11/02/95 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE WASH & DETAIL SER 001-110-999-5262
2~178 11/02/95 000907 RANCHO. CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE WASH & OETAIL SER 190-180-999-5214
'B 11/02/95 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE WASH & DETAIL SER 190-180-999-5263
21.50
11.23
16.00
12.02
16.56
48.00
152.16
277.47
26179 11/02/95 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-999-5212
217.88
217;88
26180 11/02/95 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC. SUPPLIES MAINT DIVISION
26180 11/02/95 001097 'ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC. TAX
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
68.00
5.27
T3.27
26181 11/02/95 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & PLAN CHECK SERVICES/AUG
26181 11/02/95 000271 ROBERT BEIN, t~4 FROST & PLAN CHECK SERVICES/SEPT
001'162'999'5248
001'162'999'5248
657.75
533.25
1,191.00
26182 11/02/95 000499 S C C C A
CITY CLERK MBERSHP MTG:J.GREEK 001-120-999-5260
25.00
25.00
26183 11/02/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CiTY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263
26183 11/02/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-110-999-5262
26183 11/02/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 100-164-601-5263
26183 11/02/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-163-999-5263
26183 11/02/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-999-5263
26183 11/02/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263
26183 11/02/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262
26183 11/02/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262
97.86
44,52
349.46
123.94
44.77
103.99
41.07
2.96
808.57
26184 11/02/95 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL MAINTENANCE AT TES POOL 190-180-999-5212
560.40
560.40
26185 11/02/95 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. CANDY FOR HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL 190-183-999-5370
26185 11/02/95 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SPECIAL CLASSES/TCSD 190-183-999-5370
20.43
538.49
558.92
26186 11/02/95 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SERVICES - CITY 340-199-999-5250
26186 11/02/95 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SERVICES - CRC 190-182-999-5250
~'~6 11/02/95 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SERVICES - SENIOR 190-181-999-5250
42.00
42.00
29.00
113.00
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 11
11/02/95 13:10 ~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26187
26187
26188
26188
26188
26188
26188
26189
26189
26190
26191
26192
26192
26192
26192
26193
26193
26193
26193
26193
26193
26193
26194
26195
26196
26197
26197
26197
26197
26197
26197
26198
26199
26200
26201
26201
26201
CHECK
DATE
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000926
000926
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000375
000375
000282
001505
000303
000303
000303
000303
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
000168
000905
000307
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000656
000320
002016
001065
001065
001065
VENDOR
NAME
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDXSON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF. MUNIC]P
STEFFEN, SUE
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
2-02-351-6289/ELECT SRVC
2-O0-397-5042/ELECT SRVC
2-02-351-4946 ELECT SERVS
2-02-351-5489 ELECT SERVS
2-00-397-5026 ST LIGHT ELECT
2-00-394-5059 ELECT SERVS
2-00-397-5067 ELECT SERVS
909 205-7826 GR
909 202-4754 KH
STAFF REGISTRATION
TUITION REXMBURSEMENT
OFFICE NAME PLATE
OFFICE NAME PLATE
FREIGHT
TAX
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 .001547 UN DUES
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES
TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC
TEMECULA TROPHY CO.
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
TEMECULA
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
CITY OF - FLE
TEMPLETON PLANNING GROU
TC~NE CENTER STATIONERS
TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
FLOWERS FOR EMPLOYEE
SHUTTLE SERV FOR P.BIRDSALL
AWARDS FOR THE CRC
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
RDA MAP REVISION TO BOUNDARIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
NEW CITY HALL SPACE PLANNING
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
340-199-999-5240
340-199-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
001-140-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5261
001-150-999-5259
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-2125
100-2125
190-2125
193-2125
280-2125
300-2125
320-2125
001-2170
001-100-999-5258
190-182-999-5301
001-1020
190-1020
280-1020
300-1020
340-1020
165-1020
280-199-999-5250
001-163-999-5220
210-199-650-5804
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
ITEM
AMOUNT
34.40
3,089.86
1,053.60
109.58
3,810.87
4,095.66
750.29
82.10
81.24
160.00
195.87
12.50
12.50
3.00
1.94
433.83
86.95
129.50
18.50
11.10
4.62
18.50
49.57
75.00
110.11
3,644.22
644.16
306.26
37.50
62.5 0
68.75
808.50
43.92
439.61
2,288.09
211.62
367.85
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,124.26
9,820.00
163.34
160.00
195.87
29.94
703.00
49.57
75.O0
110.11
4,763.39
808.50
43.92
439.61
VOUCHRE2
1 ~L02/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26201
26201
26201
26201
26201
26202
26202
26202
26202
26202
26203
26203
26203
26203
26203
26204
26204
26204
26204
'04
~4
~6204
26205
26206
26207
26208
26209
26210
26211
26211
26212
13:10
CHECK
DATE
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
11/02/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
000332
001209
000379
001342
000342
000345
000347
000347
000348
VENDOR
NAME
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF CONP
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
VAULT INC., THE
W DEAN DAVIDSON CO.
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WINDSOR PARTNERS
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
ZEE SERVICE COMPANY, IN
ZEE SERVICE COMPANY, IN
ZIGLER, GAlL
UNIFORM MAINT/PUBLIC WORKS
UNIFORM MAINT/PUBLIC WORKS
UNIFORM MA]NT/PUBLIC WORKS
UNIFORM NA]NT, FOR TCSD
CLEANING FLOOR MATS CITY HALL
CLEANING FLOOR MATS CRC
CLEANING FLOOR MATS SEN CENTER
PLAN CHECK SERVICES/AUG
OFF-SITE STORAGE FOR VAULT
PROF SRVCS/SENIOR CENTER
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL & STORAGE RENT
5100 COPIER MONTHLY LEASE
MEDICAL SUPPLIES - CITY HALL
TAX
REIMB:DEPT ADMIN MTG a CRC
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
194-2080
280-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
193-2160
280-2160
001-2120
100-2120
165-2120
190-2120
280-2120
100-164-601-5243
100-164-601-5243
100-164-601-5243
190-180-999-5243
340-199-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
001-162-999-5248
330-199-999-5Z77
190-180-999-5250
190-182-999-5212
340-199-999-5234
330-199-999-5239
340-199-999-5242
340-199-999-5242
190-180-999-5Z60
ITEM
AMOUNT
5.00
57.20
4.99
312.50
87.50
492.24
31.06
410.16
47.88
20.02
55.50
6.80
.75
17.00
1.95
17.00
64.49
24.00
21.35
35.50
38.40
25.62
792.87
230.74
300.00
4.44
11,761.76
2,986.12
149.30
11.57
62.39
PAGE 12
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,334.75
1,001.36
82.00
226.36
792.87
230.74
300.00
4.44
11,761.76
2,986.12
160.87
62.39
TOTAL CHECKS 339,934.52
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 5
1~-~q2/95 16:04
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
859,791.86
1,133.95
3,115.67
48,474.63
815.58
18,669.33
197,577.08
22,325.19
17,527.30
3,021.09
1,172,451.68
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/02/95 16:04 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
26215 11/14/95 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP
26215 11/14/95 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP
DESIGN SERVICES-MARGARITA PARK 210-190-119-5802
PROF SRVCS/DUCK POND PARK 210-190-143-5802
2,425.00
1,660.00
4,085.00
26216 11/14/95 002085 BARNEY & BARNEY EQUIP FLOATER INS/2176308 300-199-999-5204
26216 11/14/95 002085 BARNEY & BARNEY CREDIT EQUIP FLOATER INS 300-199-999-5204
26216 11/14/95 002085 BARNEY & BARNEY PROPERTY INSURANCE:AUG/SEPT 300-199-999-5204
26216 11/14/95 002085 BARNEY & BARNEY COMM PACK INS/ACM24707074 300-199-999-5204
1,074.62
597.52-
2,990.00
12,334.82
15,801.92
26217 11/14/95 002093 BERRYMAN AND HENIGAR PROF SERVCS TAX CONSULTANT/SEP 280-2645 4,460.00 4,460.00
26218 11/14/95 002005 BUILDING ENERGY CONSULT BALLFIELD LIGHTING/TEM SCHOOL 210-190-141-5804 113,085.00 113,085.00
26219 11/14/95 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS SEPT PROF LEGAL SERVS 001-130-999-5246
26219 11/14/95 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS SEPT PROF LEGAL SERVS 300-199-999-5207
26219 11/14/95 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS SEPT PROF LEGAL SERVS 280-199-999-5246
26219 11/14/95 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS PENDING CLAIM ADJUSTER APPROVA 300-199-999-5207
26219 11/14/95 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS OVRCNGED HRLY RATE FOR D.DEGRA 300-199-999-5207
26220 11/14/95 001178 C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I BUSINESS LICENSE FORMS 001-140-999-5222
11,188.49
8,389.58
4,374.27
8,389.58'
3.00-
1,281.92
15,559.76
1,281.92
26221 11/14/95 000126
26221 11/14/95 000126
26221 11/14/95 000126
26221 11/14/95 000126
26221 11/14/95 000126
26221 11/14/95 000126
26222 11/14/95
26223 11/14/95
26223 11/14/95
26224 11/14/95
26225 11/14/95
26225 11/14/95
26226 11/14/95
26227 11/14/95
26227 11/14/95
26228 11/14/95
26228 11/14/95
26229 11/14/95
26230 11/14/95
26230 11/14/95
26231 11/14/95
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
000136 CHESHERS~ CUSTOM EMBROI
000136 CHESHERS# CUSTOM EMBROI
001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
000164 ESGIL CORPORATION
000164 ESGIL CORPORATION
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM
000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH
000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH
000202 J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES
LANDSCAPE MAINT FOR PARKS
LANDSCAPE NAINT/SENIOR CENTER
LANDSCAPE MAINT FOR CRC
LANDSCAPE MAINT FOR MEDIANS
LANDSCAPE MAINT. DUCK POND
LANDSCAPE MAINT. PALA PARK
MITTLEMAN-8/19/93
HATS FOR CITY GOLF TOURNAMENT
TAX
CITY SEAL CONST ~ LOMA LINDA
TEMP HELP WK 9/16-10/4 COX
PROJ HELP 2 W/E 10/13 DUNCAN
LDSCP REVIEW FOR PLANNING DEPT
PLAN CHECK SERVICES/AUG
PLAN CHECK SERVS/SEPT 95
LANDSCAPE MA[NT/SLOPES
LANDSCAPE MAINT/SPORTS PARK
PROF SERVCS MATERIAL TESTING
TRAFFIC SAFETY BROCHURES
TAX
SEPT SERVS-RANCHO CAL SPT PRK
190-180-999-5415
190-181-999-5415
190-182-999-5415
191-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
300-199-999-5205
001-2172
001-2172
190-180-999-5244
001-162-999-5250
001-162-999-5250
001-161-501-5250
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
193-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
210-190-137-5802
100-164-602-5222
100-164-602-5222
210-190-137-5802
13,547.61
242.52
1,670.81
815.58
1,445.00
2,336.00
1,728.38
972.00
75.33
1,958.90
2,418.00
2,040.00
1,425.00
2,962.77
7,867.55
18,669.33
7,605,64
1,650.00
995.00
77oll
2,709.47
20,057.52
1,728.38
1,047.33
1,958.90
4,458.00
1,425.00
10,830.32
26,274.97
1,650.00
1~072.11
2,70~
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2
lt~./95 16:04
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26232
26232
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
2.~233
,3
26233
26233
26233
26233
26233
26234
262~5
26235
26235
26236
26236
26237
26237
26237
26237
26237
26237
26238
26238
26238
CHECK
DATE
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000217
000217
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001384
001892
000230
000230
000230
001713
001713
001383
001383
001383
001383
001383
001383
001416
001416
001416
000270
VENDOR
NAME
MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS
MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
'MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MOBILE MQOULAR
NUN] FINANCIAL SERVICES
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES
MUN] FINANCIAL SERVICES
NORRIS-REPKE, INC.
NORRIS-REPKE, INC.
P M W ASSOCIATES, INC.
P M W ASSOCIATES, INC.
P M W ASSOCIATES, INC.
P M W ASSOCIATES° INC.
P M W ASSOCIATES, INC.
P M W ASSOCIATES, INC.
QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS, I
QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS, I
QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS, I
R J M DESIGN GROUP° INC
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIALS
ADULT VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS
CITY STATIONARY - ENVELOPES
CITY STATIONARY - ENVELOPES
CITY STATIONARY - ENVELOPES
CITY STATIONARY - ENVELOPES
CITY STATIONARY - ENVELOPES
CITY STATIONARY - LETTERHEAD
CITY STATIONARY - LETTERHEAD
CITY STATIONARY - LETTERHEAD
CITY STATIONARY - LETTERHEAD
CITY STATIONARY - LETTERHEAD
CITY STATIONARY - LETTERHEAD
CITY STATIONARY - LETTERHEAD
CITY STATIONARY - BLANK PAGE
CITY STATIONARY - BLANK PAGE
CITY STATIONARY - BLANK PAGE
CITY STATIONARY - BLANK PAGE
CiTY STATIONARY - BLANK PAGE
CITY STATIONARY - BLANK PAGE
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
INTERIM FIRE STATION
ASSESSMENT MAILOUT
ASSESSMENT ADMIN/TCSD RATES
ASSESSMENT ADMIN/TCSD RATES
CIVIL ENG SERVS FOR 1ST BRIDGE
CIVIL ENG DESIGN SERVS 1ST BRI
TEAMBUILDING TRAIN 10/24-25
TEAHBUILDING 10/17-18/95
TEAHBUILDING 10/17-18/95
TEAMBUILDING 10/17-18/95
SEPT PROF SERVS-RDA CONSULTING
SEPT PROF SERVS-RDA CONSULTING
"VOORBURG PARK" SIGN
CONSTRUCTION OF STONE COLUMNS
TAX
AUG PRGSS PMT-PRK VIEW SITE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
001-120-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-161-501-5220
001-161-502-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-161-501-5220
001-161-502-5220
100-164-604-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-161-501-5220
001-161-502-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-161-501-5220
001-161-502-5220
100-164-604-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-171-999-5470
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5370
190-180-999-5370
280-199-807-5802
280-199-807-5802
190-180-999-5250
001-161-502-5261
001-162-999-5248
001-161-501-5261
280-199-999-5248
165-199-999-5248
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-5Z44
210-190-626-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,900,80
415.80
132.62
132.62
84.87
90.18
90.17
90.59
90.59
57.22
45.30
45.30
57.22
90.58
15.24
15.24
7.62
7.62
15.24
15.24
17.57
17.57
7.81
8.79
8.79
4.62
1.26
17.56
1,131.38
4,636.73
4,693.12'
9,279,03
4,124.75
6,250.50
1,740.20
542.30
783.20
414.70
3,115.67
3,115.67
985.00
1,650.00
76.34
3,168.75
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,316.60
1,167.43
1,131.38
9,222.64
10,375.25
9,711.74
2,711.34
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 3
11/02/95 16:04 ~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26239
26239
26239
26239
26240
26240
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26241
26242
26242
26243
26243
26243
26244
26244
26244
26245
26246
26246
26246
26247
26247
26247
CHECK
DATE
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000270
000270
000270
000270
000678
000678
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000955
000955
000269
000269
000269
002057
002057
002057
002021
001972
001972
001972
000302
000302
000302
VENDOR
NAME
R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC
R J N DESIGN GROUP, ZNC
R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC
R J N DESIGN GROUP, ]NC
RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE
RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFPS
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFPS
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S-
RIVERSIDE CO.. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFPS
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF-B
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF-B
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
SAN DIEGO LIGHTING
SAN DIEGO LIGHTING
SAN DIEGO LIGHTING
SELF~S JANITORIAL SERVI
STANLEY R. HOFFMAN ASSO
STANLEY R. HOFFMAN ASSO
STANLEY R. HOFFMAN ASSO
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
AUG PRGSS PMT-PRK VIEW SITE
AUG PRGSS PMT-PRKVIEW STATION
AUG PRGSS PMT-PRKVIEW STATION
REIMB EXPENSES FOR PRKVIEW STA
AMINAL CONTROL SERVS-JULY 95
JUNE 95 AN]ttAL CONTROL SERVS
LAW ENFOREMENT - APRIL/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - APRIL/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - APRIL/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - APRIL/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - APRIL/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - APRIL/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - APRIL/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - APRIL/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - APRIL/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - APRIL/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - MAY/95
LAW ENFORENENT - MAY/95
LAW ENFORENENT - MAY/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - MAY/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - MAY/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - MAY/95
LAW ENFORENENT - MAY/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - NAY/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - NAY/95
LAW ENFOREMENT - MAY/95
APRIL 95 BOOKING CHARGES
MAY 95 BOOKING FEES
JULY 95 BIKE PATROL
AUG 95 BIKE PATROL
WHITE COPY PAPER 80 REAMS
WHITE COPY PAPER
TAX
LIGHTING CONTROL SOFTWARE
SOFTWARE TRAINING
TAX
RESTROOM MAINTENANCE SERVICES
PROF SRVCS/FISCAL ANAYSES
PROF SRVCS/FISCAL ANALYSES
PROF SRVCS/FISCAL ANALYSES
371(19 BRIDGE
CORNER, 37"
LATERAL FILE, 2 DRAWER,37"
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-190-626-5802
210-190-626-5802
210-190-626-5802
210-190-626-5802
001-172-999-5255
001-172-999-5255
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5290
001-170-999-5291
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5281
001-1230
001*170-999-5288
001-170-99~-5290
001-170-999-5291
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5281
001-1230
001-1230
001-170-999-5273
001-170-999-5273
001-170-999-5326
001-170-999-5326
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
210-190-120-5804
210-190-1Z0-5804
210-190-120-5804
190-180-999-5250
001-161-502-5248
001-161-502-5248
001-161-502-5248
190-180-999-5601
190-180-999-5601
190-180-999-5601
ITEM
AMOUNT
3,018.75-
12,492.45
11,016.15-
507.58
6,757.87
8,829.93
313,656.34
33,645.94
12,835.22
7,855.95
3,377.14
46,098.77
16,254.22
17,212.21
22,907.64
7,855.94
187,675.29
6,484.94
2,063.39
3,404.80
31,169.88
10,133.81
14,300.91
23,050.44
1,999.74
63.65
10,929.60
13,689.60
1,890.00
1,134.00
2,712.00
91.80
217.29
1,825.00
100.00
141.44
1,494.00
7,400.78
2,400.00
200.00
215.00
435.00
625.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,133.88
15,587.80
786,665.42
3,024.00
3,021.09
2,066.44
1,494.00
10,000.78
VOUCHRE2
1 lzD2/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
26247
~7
7
~0247
26247
26247
26248
26248
26248
26248
26249
26249
26249
26250
26250
26251
26252
26253
26253
26254
16:04
CHECK
DATE
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
tl/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
11/14/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000302
000319
000319
000319
000319
000420
000420
000420
002016
002016
000329
000332
000332
000379
VENDOR
NAME
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE ]NC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE ]NC,
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE ]NC.
SYSTEM SOURCE INC.
TOMARK SPORTS, INC.
TOMARK SPORTS, INC.
TOMARK SPORTS, INC.
TOMARK SPORTS, INC.
TRANS'PACIFIC CONSULTAN
TRAMS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES
TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, IN
VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT C
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
DEAN DAVIDSON CO.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
37" OVERHEAD
TASKL I GHT
LATERAL FILE FOR TCSD DEPT
REWORK EXISTING PRODUCT TO
DESK SHELL 30X67
PEDESTAL B/B/F
KEYBOARD DRAWER
TAX
SINGLE PED DESK
SINGLE PED DESK
DESK RISER
DESK RISER
TACKBOARD
TACKBOARD
TASK LIGHT
TASK LIGHT
BRIDGE TOP
BRIDGE TOP
SINGLE PED DESK
SINGLE PED DESK
PANEL HINGE
PANEL HINGE
KEY BOARD TRAY
KEY BOARD TRAY
TAX
TAX
CREDIT/INCORRECT DESK/KEYBOARD
ALUMINUM BLEACHERS t MID SCHO0
INSTALLATION
FREIGHT
TAX
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT
PRO. SRVCS/DESIGN MGMT SYSTEM
PRO. SRVCS/WESTERN BY-PASS
NEW CITY HALL SPACE PLANNING
AMEND #1/CITY HALL DESIGN
CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES
SECURITY RELEASE TR 22627-F
PLAN CHECK SERVICES/SEPT
PLANC CHECK SERVICES-SEP
PROF SRVCS/CITY MAINT FACILITY
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5601
190-180-~-5601
190-180-9~9-5601
190-180-~99-5601
190-180-999-5601
190-180-999-5601
190-180-999-5601
190-180-999-5601
001-161-501-5601
001-161-502-5601
001-161-501-5601
001-161-502-5601
001-161-501-5601
001-161-502-5601
001-161-501-5601
001-161-502-5601
001-161-501-5601
001-161-502-5601
001-161-501-5601
001-161-502-5601
001-161-501-5601
001-161-502-5601
001-161-501-5601
001-161-502-5601
001-161-501-5601
001-161-502-5601
190-180-999-5601
210-190-141-5804
210-190-141-5804
210-190-141-5804
210-190-141-5804
210-165-655-5802
210-165-655-5802
210-165-612-5802
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-5804
001-161-502-5248
001-2670
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
210-190-144-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
390.00
156.00
120.00
70.00
890.00
830.00
310.00
313.20
264.50
264.50
194.00
194.00
47.50
47.50
31.50
31.50
64.50
64.50
252.00
252.00
9.00
9.00
97.50
97.50
74.46
74.45
2,187.33-
6,804.00
1,600.00
480.00
527.31
16,236,25
1,800.00
37,058.83
1,615.80
2,183.10
1,761.00
3,250.00
1,356.26
1,884.96
3,542.00
PAGE
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,236,78
9,411.31
55,095.08
3,798.90
1,761.00
3,250.00
3,241.22
3,542.00
TOTAL CHECKS 1,172,451.68
VOUCHRE2
' 't/95
16:06
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
TOTAL
AMOUNT
1,387,419.05
1,387,419.05
VOUCHRE2
10/12/95 15:37
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
112295 11/22/95 000166
CZTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGZSTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO. ACQUISTZON NEW CiTY HALL PRE 210-199-650-5804
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,387,419.05
PAGE
CHECK
AMCUNT
1,387,419.05
TOTAL CHECKS 1,387,419.05
ITEM 4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
November 14, 1995
Records Destruction Approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided
under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17
which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete
or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the
Government Code.
The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process
of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit
details Encroachment Permits of 9/8/87 to 12/10/91; Grading Permits from 7/6/90 to 1/7/92;
Public Works Project Files from 9/19/90 to 7/30/93. These records have been microfilmed in
triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Planning Department
and one in permanent off-site storage.
These records are all qualified for destruction at this time under the provisions of the Records
Retention Schedule. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1"
of the Annual Review as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17.
ATTACHMENTS:
Destruction of Records Request
List of Records recommended for destruction
JSG
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Clerk
Paula Sargent
Office Technician
November 14, 1995
Destruction of Records Request
Attached is a print out of.' Encroachment Permits (Retention Code 80205) of 9/8/87 (#87957)
to 12/10/91 (#8%9-83); Grading Permits (Retention Code 80202) from 7/6/90 (/90001) to
1/7/92 (/91-031); Public Works (Retention Code 80605) from 9/19/90 (/91-03) to 7//30/93
(/92-12). These records have been microf~med in triplicate with a copy distributed to the
City Clerk's Records Vault, the Public Works Department and a copy to the Vault in San
Diego.
The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Seaion 34090, I hereby give my consent
to the destruaion of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of
Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
Departmere Head:
City Attorney:
eph Kicak, Public Works Department
R:\forma~destruct.rqs
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Te,ecuLe Doc. Ref ......... 163 Page
10/11/1995 FiLes Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 80205 09:33:09
Destruction Date. 10/24/1995
Doc. I t~m Bet. FiLe Reference # Storage Nedis
' Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
163 09/08/1987 87957 Encroachment Permit 87-9-57 80205 0050 FiLm 3821111A0001
Group i 163/120/The VauLt
163 0~/03/1990 90~17 Encreschmmt Permit 90-4-17 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 163/120/The VauLT
163 06/06/1990 90001 Encroachment Permit 90-001 80205 OO50 FiLm :3821N1AO001
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/08/1990 900(~ Encroachment Permit 90-00~ 80205 0050 FiLm 3~.lN1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/11/1990 90003 Encroachment Permit 90-003 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/11/1~90 90010 Encreschm~t Permit 90-010 80205 0050 FiLm 3821141A0001
Group i 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/18/1F~0 90002 Encroachment Permit 90-002 80205 0050 FiLe 3821N1AO001
Group ] 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/18/1990 90007 EncroachgEnt Permit 90-007 80205 0050 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ] 163/120/The VauLt
06/18/1990 90008 Encroachment Permit 90-008 80205 0050 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group [ 163/120/The VauLt
163 0~/19/1990 9002/~ Encroachment Permit 90-024 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/20/1990 90009 Encroachment Permit 90-009 80205 0050 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group Z 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/22/1990 89011 Encroachment Permit 89-011 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/22/1990 90011 Encroact,nent Permit 90-011 80205 0050 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group [ 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/27/1990 90015 Encroachment Permit 90-015 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group T 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/27/1990 90016 Encroachment Permit 90-016 80205 0050 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/27/1990 90017 Encroachment Permit 90-017 80205 0050 FiLe 3821N1AOO01
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
163 06/27/1990 90018 Encroachment Permit 90-018 80205 0050 FiLm 3821141A0001
Group Z 163/120/The VauLT
..................................................... ~ ..........
. . 0~/27/1990 90019 Encroachment Permit 90-019 80205 0050 FiLm :3821H1AO001
Group Z 163/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of TamecuLl Page 2
10/11/1~5 Fites Ready for Destruction 0~:33:0~
Ztm Bet. FiLe Reference # Storap N~ie
Date Ref. Brief D,cripti~ Code S~urity CL,s Storage L~eti~ L~etim Refer,
07/02/1~0 90012 E~r~chment Pemit ~-012 ~205 OO50 FiLm 3821HIAO~l
Group I l~/120/The V~tt
07/02/19~0 9~13 E~r~chment Pemit ~-013 M2~ 0050 Fitm 3821N1AO001
GroqD [ 1~/120/The V~Lt
07/02/19<)0 ~025 E~r~chment Pemit ~-025 ~205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! l~/120/The VauLt
07/02/1~0 9002& E~r~chment Pemit ~-02& ~2~ 0~0 FiLm ~821N1AO~1
GreJp ] l~/120/The VauLt
07/02/19~)0 ~027 Emr~chment Pemit 90-027 ~2~ 0050 FiLm ]821N1AO~1
Group Z 1~/120/The VauLt
07/02/1~0 90028 E~r~chment Pemit 90-028 ~2~ 0050 FiLm 38Z1N1AO001
Group ~ 1~/120/The VauLt
0~02/1990 ~029 Emroachment Pemit ~-029 ~2~ 0050 FiLm 3821NIAO~1
Group i l~/120/The VauLt
0~02/1~0 90030 E~r~chment Pemit ~-030 ~2~ 0050 FILm 3821N1AO001
Group I l~/120/The VauLt
07/09/1~0 ~031 Emr~chment Pemit ~-031 ~2~ 0050 FiLm 3821NIAO~l
Group Z l~/120/The V~Lt
0~09/1~0 900~ E~r~chment Pemit ~0~ ~2~ 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO~l
Group ! l~/120/The VauLt
07/11/1~0 ~032 E~r~chment Pemit 90-032 ~205 0050 FiLm 3821N1A0001
Group [ 1~/120/The VauLt
07/11/1~0 90037 E~roachment Pemit 90-037 ~205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I l~/120/The VauLt
07/11/19~0 900~ E~roachment Pemit 90-038 ~205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group X 1~/120/The V~tt
........... ; ......................................................
0711211~0 ~039 E~r~chment Pemit 90-0~9 ~205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I l~/120/The V~Lt
0711211~90 ~0 Emr~chment Pemi t 90-~0 , ~205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO~l
Group I l~/120/The VauLt
07/1Z/1~0 90~1 E~r~chment Pemit 90-~1 ~205 0050 Fits ~821N1AO~l
Groq~ ] l~/120/The V~Lt
07/13/1990 ~2 E~r~chment Pemit 90-~2 ~205 ~50 FiLm ]821N1AO~l
Group I 1~/120/The V~Lt
0~16/1990 90021 E~r~chment Pemit 90-021 ~205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 1~/120/The V~tt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Tamecute Page 3
10/11/1995 Fi tea Reedy for Destruction 09:33:09
DD¢. ! ten Ret. F i Le Reference # Storage Hedi a
' Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
163 0711611990 90035 Encroachment Permit 90035 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
163 0711611990 90036 Encroachment Permit 90036 80205 0050 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Groq~ I 163/120/The VauLt
163 07/16/1990 900/~ EncroachRent Permit 90-04~ 80205 0050 FiLm :3821N1AO001
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
163 07/16/1990 900z,5 Encroachment Permit 90-0/,5 80205 0050 FiLm 3821141A0001
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
163 07/16/1990 90049 Encroachment Permit 90-049 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 1&3/120/The VauLt
163 07/16/1990 90051 Encroachment Permit 90-051 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
163 07/17/19990 90636 Encroachment Permit 90-6-36 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ] 163/120/The Vault
163 07/18/1990 90050 Encroachment Permit 90-050 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
07/18/1990 90053 Encroachment Permit 90-053 80205 0050 FiLm :3821N1AO001
Group [ 163/120/The VauLt
163 07/19/1990 90052 Encroachment Permit 90-052 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
163 07/20/1990 90033 Encroachment Permit 90-033 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 16311201The VauLt
163 0712011990 9005~, Encroachment Permit g0-05/, 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ] 163/120/The VauLt
163 071Z011990 90055 Encroachment Permit 90-055 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 163/120/The VauLt
163 07/20/1990 90056 Encroachment Permit 90-056 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 163/12Q/The VauLt
163 07/20/1990 90057 Encroachment Permit 90-057 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
163 07/Z0/1990 90058 Encroachment Permit 90-058 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
163 07/20/1990 90059 Encroachment Permit 90-059 80205 0050 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group [ 163/120/The VauLt
,~ 07/Z3/19~0 90060 Encroachment Permit 90-060 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RRO&I City of Te~wcuta Page
10/11/1995 F i Lea Reedy for Destruction 09::33:09
Doc. %tee Ret. FiLe Reference # Storage Nedia
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Refer
163 07/2311990 90061 Encroachment Permit 90-061 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
163 0712311990 90062 Encroachment Permit 90-062 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Groq~ ] 163/1201The VauLt
163 07/23/1990 90063 Encroachment Permit 90-063 80205 0050 FiLm 3821lllA0001
Group i 163/120/The VauLt
163 07/23/1990 90064 Encroachment Permit 90-064 80205 0050 FiLm :3821NIAO001
Group I 1631120/The VauLt
163 07127/1990 9004,8 Encroachment Permit 90-048 80205 0050 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
163 09/10/1~N) 90005 Encroachment Permit 90-005 80205 0050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group % 163/120/The VauLt
163 09110/1990 90006 Encroachment Permit 90-006 80205 0050 FiLm ~821NIAO001
Groq~ I 163/120/The VauLt
163 09125/1990 90046 Encroachment Permit ~0-04~ 80205 0050 FiLm 3821NIAO001
~roup I 163/120/The VauLt
163 05/1511991 08906 Encroachment Permit 08-09-6-RIJ-2130 80205 0050 FiLm 3821HIAOO01
Group i 163/120/The VauLt
163 08128/1991 67771 Encroachment Permit 6777-1390 80205 0050 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
163 12/10/1991 87983 Encroachment Permit 87-9-83 80205 0050 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group i 163/120/The VauLt
65 Records Processed
RRDESTY...RR061 City of TemecuLe Doc. Ref ......... 163 Page 1
10/11/1~5 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 80202 09:33:~6
Destruction Date. 10/24/1~5
DEc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage liedim
Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Store Location Location Reference
163 07/06/1990 90001 Grading Permit 90-001 80202 0069 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 163/1ZO/The Vault
163 07/06/1~90 90002 Grading Pemit 90-002 80202 0l)~9 Film 3821l!1A0001
Gro~ i 163/120/The Vault
163 07/11/1~c~0 9000~ Grading Permit 90-003 80202 OlY,9 Film 3821N1AO001
Gro~ ! 163/120/The Vault
163 07/26/1~)0 ~O00z, Grading Pemit ~O-OOA 80202 00/,9 Film 3821111A0001
Group [ 163/120/The Vault
163 07/:51/1990 90005 Grading Permit 90-005 80Z02 00~9 Film 3821111A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/07/1990 90006 Grading Permit 90-006 80202 00~9 Film 3821H1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The Vault
163 08/07/1990 90007' Grading Pemit 90-007' 80202 0069 Film 3821111A0001
Group ! 16~/120/The Vault
163 08/16/1990 90008 Grading Permit 90-008 80202 0069 Fi~B 3821H1AO001
~roup ! 163/120/The Vault
08/2~,/1990 90009 Grading Permit 90-009 ~0202 0069 Film 31i21111A0001
Group ! 16~/120/The Vault
163 09/07/1990 90010 Grading Permit 90-010 80202 0069 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I - 163/120/The Vault
163 09/07/1990 90012 Grading Pemit 90-012 80202 0050 Film 3l~1141A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/14/1990 9001:5 Grading Pemit 90-013 80202 0050 Film 3821N1AO001
Gro~ I 163/120/The Vault
16:~ 09/27/1990 90015 Grading Permit 90-015 80202 0050 Film 3821111A0001
Group ! 163/120/The Vault
163 10/02/1990 90014 Grading Permit 90014 80202 0050 Film 3a21N1AO001
Grm40 I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/10/1990 90017 Grading Pemit 90-017 80202 0050 Film 3a21111AO001
Group ! 163/120/The Vault
163 10/15/1990 90018 Grading Pemit 90-018 80202 0050 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/17/1990 90019 Grading Pemits 90-019 80202 0050 Film 3821141A0001
Group I 16~/120/The Vault
._, 10/24/1990 90022 Grading Pemit 90-022 80202 0050 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RRC)61 City of TemecuLa Page 2
10/11/1995 FiLes Ready for Destruction 09:33:~
Doc. item Ret. FiLe Reference # Storage Hadis
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Refer
163 10/29/1990 90075 Grading Pemit 90-075 80202 0050 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
163 10/50/1990 90023 Grading Permit 90-023 80202 0050 FiLe :5821N1AO001
Group ! 16~/1ZO/The VauLt
163 10/30/1990 90024 Grading Permit 90-024 80202 OOSO FiLm 3821N1AO001
Grcxjp i 16]/120/The VauLt
163 11/02/1~90 90011 Grading Pemit 90-011 80202 00/,9 FiLm 3821HIAO001
Group ! l~53/120/The VauLt
163 11/28/1~0 ~0025 Grading Pemit 90-025 80202 0050 FiLm :S821111A0001
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
163 11/28/1990 90026 Grading Permit 90-026 80202 0050 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ! 16~/120/The VauLt
163 10/16/1991 082/*7 Grading Pemit 6082/,7 80202 00~9 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 163/120/The VauLt
163 01/07/1992 91031 Grading Permit 91-031 80202 OOSO FiLm 3821M1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
26 Records Processed
RRDESTY...RR~I City of Tamecute DK. Ref ......... 1~ Page 1
10/11/1995 Fit. Ready for D.tructian Retention Code... 80605 ff:~:15
Dutrztion Date. 10/24/1995
D~. Ztem Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage N~ia
Date Ref. Brief Ducription Code S~urity CLass Storage L~ati~ L~etion Reference
1~ ~/19/1~0 91003 PubLic Works 91-03 80605 0~1 FiLm :5821H1AO001
Group i l~/121/The VauLt
1~ 09/26/1~1 91~2 PubLic Uorks 91-02 80605 0~1 FiLm 382.1N1AO001
Group i 163/121/The V~Lt
lg 02/11/1~2 92001 PubLic Works 92-01 80605 0~1 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 163/120/The V~Lt
1~ 05/~/1~2 92003 PubLic Works ~-03 80605 00~2 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I l~1120/The VauLt
1~ 05/1)/1~2 92029 PubLic Works 92-029 806~ 004~ & 0~5 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group i l~/120/The VauLt
1~ 06/30/1~2 920~ PubLic Works 92-~ 80605 0~2 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I l~/120/The VauLt
1~ 0711611~2 92002 PubLic Works 92-02 80605 0~2 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ] lg/120/The VauLt
1~ 10/05/1~2 920~ PubLic Works 92-~ 80605 0~3 FiLm 3821H1AO~l
Group ! 163/120/The VauLt
10/16/1~2 92007 PubLic Works 92-07 80605 0~3 FiLm 38Z1H1AO001
Group ! 163/1201The VauLt
1~ 10/19/1~2 92011 PubLic Works 92-11 ~5 00~ FiLm 382INLAY01
Group ! l~/1201The VauLt
1~ 03/11/1~3 920~ PubLic Works 92-~ 80605 00~3 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ] l~/120/The VauLt
1~ 03/30/1~3 ~001 PubLic Works 93-01 80605 0~7 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ] lg/120/The VauLt
1~ ~/27/1~3 93002 PubLic Works 9)-02 ~605 OOA8 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ l~/120/The VauLt
1~ 0~12711~3 930~ PubLic Works 9~-~ ~605 OOA8 & 0~9 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 16;3/120/The VauLt
1~ 0610711~3 92009 PubLic Works 92-~ 80605 OOA~ FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i l~1120/The VauLt
1~ 0710711~3 930~ PubLic Works 93-~ 80605 0~9 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
1~ 0710711993 940~ PubLic Works ~-~ 80605 0~9 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group I l~1120/The VauLt
,~, 0713011~3 92012 PubLic Works 92-12 80605 OOA~ FiLm 387. lM1AO~l
Group I 1~1120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061
10/11/1995
Ref. Date
item
Ref. Brief Description
18 Records Processed
City of TemecuLa
Files Ready for Destruction
Ret. FiLe Reference #
Code Security CLass
StorBge Nedia
Storage LocBtion
Page 2
09:3~:15
Location Refer,
I'I'EM 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT.
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberrs, Director of Financ~
November 14, 1995
Out-of-State Travel
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize certain out-of-state travel plans.
DISCUSSION: The City's current travel policy requires Council authorization for all out-
of-state travel. Approval for the following out-of-state travel is requested.
Attendees Location Conference Cost
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Phoenix, AZ National League of Cities $1,200
Ronald H. Roberrs, Councilman Phoenix, AZ National League of Cities $1,200
Chris Antoniadis, Sr. Investigator Las Vegas, NV Advanced Practical $ 759
Homicide Investigation
TOTAL: $3,159
The National League of Cities Conference is being held November 29 through December 2,
1995. Expenses involved will be airfare, hotel, conference registration and meal allowance.
Representatives of the City of Temecula have attended the National League of Cities annual
meetings for the past three years. The topics covered are of national importance and the
ability to network with other state and national legislators is especially beneficial.
The Advanced Practical Homicide Investigation school, offered only once this year, will be held
in Las Vegas, NV. The Police Dept wishes to send one detective for the follow.ing reasons:
1 ) Fine instructors are drawn from throughout the U.S.;
2) Henry Lee (O.J. defense expert) will be a primary speaker; and
3) Extensive instruction will be given on DNA evidence.
The Police Dept will handle the costs as shown below:
1 ) City will cover tuition and lodging ($759).
2) County will provide transportation.
3) Employee will cover meal expense.
R:INORTONLtAGENDAStOSTI 114.AGN 10/17/95
The Police Dept Senior Investigator, Chris Antoniadis, has attended other Advanced Homicide
courses offered in-state. This course available in Las Vegas is not reimbursable by the State
(POST). However, the course content is unique and will be valuable to City staff.
FISCAL IMPACT: The funds ($2,400) for the National League of Cities will be charged to
account number 001-100-999-5258. The Police Dept expense of $759 will be charged to
account number 001-170-999-5261.
R:iNORTONLtAGENDASIOST1114.AGN 10/I 7/95
I~I'EM 6
APPROVAL~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: '
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
November 14, 1995
Liability Insurance Renewal
PREPARED BY:
Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the City of Temecula Liability
Insurance Policy Renewal with Insurance Company of the West for the period of
December 1, 1995 through December 1, 1996.
DISCUSSION: In anticipation of the City's Liability Insurance Policy with Insurance
Company of the West ("ICW") expiring on December 1, 1995, staff requested that the City's
liability insurance broker, CaI-Surance, market the City for liability insurance. In response to
this request, CaI-Surance obtained three proposals from the following companies in the
amounts listed:
Insurance Company of the West
Genesis Insurance Company
Insurance Company of Pennsylvania
$91,930
$90,000*
$115,000
*Premium does not include "CIGA" (California Insurance Guarantee Association) costs of
approximately $500, and the premium will likely be increased based on total operating
expenses changing during mid-year budget review or annual budget adoption.
ICW, the City's current insurance carrier, has provided a fixed premium of $91,930 for the
entire year, regardless of changes in the City's operating status. Additionally, the rates
offered are a total of $6,703 lower than the $98,633 premium for the previous year while
providing increased coverage due to the addition of two fire engines, two police motorcycles,
and five City vehicles since the 1994-95 premium quote was provided. ICW has also
proposed to cover Automobile Physical Damage at a premium of $6,197, which, even with
the addition of the aforementioned vehicles, is an increase of only $328 from last year's
premium of $5,869.
Since Genesis Insurance Company's premium is subject to increases within the period of
coverage, and ICW has provided outstanding coverage in the past, staff recommends that the
City continue both Liability and automobile physical damage insurance coverage through ICW
for the period of December 1, 1995 through December 1, 1996.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted and are available in General
Fund Liability Insurance Account 300-199-999-5200for the general liability premium, and in
Automobile Insurance Account 300-199-999-5201 for the automobile physical damage
premium.
Attachment: ICW Proposal
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST PROPOSAL
TERM: December 1, 1995- December 1, 1996
FORMAT: Occurrence
NAMED INSURED: City of Temecula
Temecula Community Services District
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
SELF-INSURED RETENTION (SIR): $50,000
COVERAGE
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
BASE LIMITS/COVERAGE
MUNICIPAL GENERAL LIABILITY
91,000,000 per occurrence excess over SIR;
95,000,000 aggregate
PUBLIC OFFICIAL'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS
91,000,000 per occurrence excess over SIR;
91,000,000 aggregate
MUNICIPAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
(Owned, Non-Owned, & Hired Automobile)
~ 1,000,000 per occurrence excess over SIR;
91,000,000 aggregate
PREMIUM
9 90,966
INCLUDED
INCLUDED
INCLUDED
EXCESS LIMITS/COVERAGE
MUNICIPAL GENERAL LIABILITY
94,000,000 aggregate
PUBLIC OFFICIAL'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS
94,000,000 per occurrence excess, over underlying
94,000,000 aggregate
MUNICIPAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
94,000,000 per occurrence excess, over underlying
No aggregate
CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION FEE
TOTAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COST
INCLUDED
INCLUDED
INCLUDED
9 464
9 ,91,930
AUTOMOBILE PHYSICAL DAMAGE ENDORSEMENT $ 6, 197
rI'EM 7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
November 14, 1995
Delegation of Authority in Processing and Settling Claims Against the
City of Temecula
PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DELEGATING TO THE CITY MANAGER AND THE
CITY CLERK CERTAIN POWERS AND AUTHORITY IN
CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS FILED AGAINST THE CITY
DISCUSSION: Currently, the City's approving authority for settling all claims regardless
of the value is the City Council. Based on discussions with the City Attorney, the City Council
may delegate approval to settle claims up to an approved dollar value so that claims with
smaller settlements may be processed promptly and efficiently by the City Manager and City
Clerk.
The attached resolution authorizes the City Manager to approve all claims not exceeding
$1,000, and authorizes the City Clerk to process such approved claims in accordance with
Part 3 of Division 3.6 of the California Government Code (commencing at Section 900). The
limit of $1,000 is consistent with the current policy which requires Council approval for all
City disbursements exceeding $1,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Attachment: Resolution No. 95-
R:IKUHNSA tAGENDA. CLM 11/6/95
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA DELEGATING TO THE CITY MANAGER
AND CITY CLERK CERTAIN POWERS AND AUTHORITY
IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS FILFr} AGAINST THE
CITY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE1VIECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds, determines and
Section 1.
declares that:
A. Part 3 of Division 3.6 of the California Government Code (commencing at Section
900), requires claims for money or damages against cities to be processed in accordance with
certain procedural requirements; and
B. The Council desires to provide for the prompt, efficient and economical handling
of these claims and therefore intends by this resolution to delegate certain responsibilities under
the claims statutes to the City Manager and City Clerk.
Section 2. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is hereby authorized and directed,
in connection with any claim fried against the City of Temecula (the "City") pursuant to Part 3
of Division 3.6 of the California Government Code (commencing at Section 900), to take such
necessary and appropriate actions with respect to such claims as are authorized or required by
said code sections, except for the settlement, allowance, compromise or payment of claims.
Section 3. The City Manager of the City of Temecula is hereby authorized to settle,
allow, compromise or pay any claims ~ed against the City pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3.6
of the California Government Code (commencing at Section 900), in an amount not to exceed
one thousand dollars ($1,000) per claim, provided, however, that money to settle claims
generally has been appropriated by the Council and money is available within such appwpriation
for the settlement, allowance, compromise or payment of the claim by the City Manager.
R:IKUHNSA tAGENDA. CLM 1 II6/95
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting held on the 14th day of November, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATrF. ST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution 95-_ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 14th day of November, 1995, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCK,MEMBERS
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R: IKUHNSA IAGENDA. CLM ~ I/6/95
ITEM 8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: '
City Council
FROM:
City Manager
DATE:
November 14, 1995
SUBJECT:
Resolution Stating the City of Temecula's Commitment
To Library Funding
PREPARED BY:
Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA STATING THE COMMITMENT OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TO RECOVER STATE LIBRARY FUNDING WHICH
HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN
DISCUSSION: During the September 24, 1995 Central Library Task Force Meeting
chaired by County Supervisor Ceniceros, the issue of library funding was raised. During the
course of discussions, Mayor Stone from City of Temecula suggested that all cities adopt
resolutions requesting that State library funding, consisting of Special District Augmentation
Funds and the State Public Library Fund, which has been withdrawn by the State, be
reinstated; or, that the State Legislature approve measures to allow California cities to retain
a larger portion of property taxes generated to fund local libraries adequately.
SPECIAL DISTRICT AUGMENTATION FUNDS
Special District Augmentation Funds (SDAF) are those property tax revenue funds designated
for special districts, based on services provided to the district, as determined by the County
Board of Supervisors. Since other public services also draw from this pool of funds, including
fire and public protection, libraries have traditionally been a low priority for these funds. To
compound the issue, in 1993, a portion of these funds were allocated to School Districts
throughout the State, further reducing funds available from property tax revenue.
The following table summarizes SDAF funding from FY 1991/92through FY 1993/94:
FISCAL YEAR
COUNTY
CONTRACT AMOUNT
SDAF FUNDS
PERCENTAGE
1994~95 $ 9,361,238 $ 0 0.00%
1993~94 8,322, 129 831,000 9.99%
1992/93 9,333,402 2,539,184 27.21%
1991/92 8,559,100 2,211,600 25.84%
PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND
The Public Library Fund (PLF) was established by SB358 in 1982 "to provide permanent,
stable, and predictable financing for public libraries of the state through a combination of state
and local revenues" (Education Code Section 18012(b)). The PLF system was designed to
have a 90%-10% local-state match. For the first two years, no program requirements were
calculated, although in FY 1983/84there was an allocation of $6,000,000as the state match;
and in FY 1984/85, there was an allocation of $12,000,000. It was not until FY 1985/86
that the PLF allocations were compared to program requirements.
The following table summarizes the funding amounts required to meet the 10% state match,
and the actual state funding provided for public libraries from the PLF. The percentage figure
is the percentage of the 10% match received:
YEAR
STATE LIBRARY FUND
MATCH REQUIREMENT
ACTUAL
STATE ALLOCATION
PERCENTAGE
1994/95 $ 47,803,195 $ 8,870,000 18.56%
1993/94 46,530,530 8,870,000 19.07%
1992/93 47,245,648 8,870,000 18.78%
1991/92 48,219,568 10,176,000 21.11%
1990/91 45,472,677 16,600,000 36.51%
1989/90 42, 127,230 20,600,000 48.90%
1988/89 39,297,504 20,600,000 52.43%
1987i88 37,617,793 20,200,000 53.70%
1986/87 34,715,623 20,000,000 57.62%
1985/86 31,686,439 18,300,000 57.76%
The attached resolution outlines the library funding shortcomings, and expresses City of
Temecula's commitment to recovering State library funding which has been substantially
reduced over the past ten years.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
RESOLUTION NO. 9~-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA STATING THE
COMMITMENT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
TO RECOVER STATE LIBRARY FUNDING
WHICH HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, in FY 1991-92, the total contract amount for operating Riverside County
Libraries was $8,559,100, of which $2,211,600 or 26% was Special District Augmentation
Funds (SDAF); and,
WHEREAS, in FY 1992-93, the total contract amount for operating Riverside County
Libraries was $9,333,402, of which $2,539,184 or 27% was SDAF; and,
WHEREAS, in FY 1993-94, Riverside County received only $831,000 or 10% of
SDAF; and,
WHEREAS, in FY 1994-95, because there were no SDAF, Riverside County was forced
to supplement the Library Contract with $2,000,000 from the County General Fund; and,
WHEREAS, since its inception in FY 1985-86, 'State of California Public Library Fund
support has decreased from 58% of the program requirement to 18.6% of the program
requirement in 1994-95,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVFX}, that
Section 1. All citizens serviced by County Library Systems have a right to expect that
local libraries obtain adequate funding to operate at appropriate service levels.
Section 2. The City Council is committed to seeking State reimbursement for funding
which has been withdrawn from Special District Augmentation Funds and the Public Library
Fund.
Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPT!~ by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeding held on the 14th day of November, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATFF_,ST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TElVlEE~A )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95-61 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of November, 1995 by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL Ry~~
CITY ATTORNEY .
FINANCE DIREC ~
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System
(Within Tracts No. 20703-3, and 22962)
(Southeasterly of Winchester Road, Southerly of Nicolas Road)
PREPARED BY:~(~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-3 AND 22962)
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract Maps No. 20703-3 on June 28,
1988, and Tract No. 22962 on November 7, 1989, and entered into subdivision improvement
agreements for the improvement of streets and drainage, and sewer and water systems on
those respective dates. On October 10, 1995, the City Council accepted the improvements
and initiated the warranty period for Tract No. 22962. The City Council then accepted the
improvements and initiated the warranty period for Tract No. 20703-3 on November 14,
1995.
These two projects were constructed by Dav-Bar I, (as to Tract No. 20303-3), and Dav-Bar
II, (as to Tract No. 22962), both California General Partnerships (Comprised of Barratt
American Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, and Davidson Pacific, a California Limited
Partnership).
The affected public streets for these projects are respectively:
Tract No 20703-3: Rosebay Court, Dandelion Court, Bolandra Court, Barberry Court, and
portions of Roripaugh Road, Winchester Road, and Nicolas Road.
r:\agdrpt\95%1114%tr207033.962 AKC/1101
Tract No. 22962: Valeriana Court, and portions of Starling Street, Senna Court, and Swallow
Court.
Under provisions of the Streets and Highways Code (Section 1806), public streets offered by
the subdivider must be accepted by City Council resolution in order to be included in the public-
street-maintained system. Winchester Road (Tract No. 20703-3)is in the State Highway
System, and Nicolas Road (Tract No. 20703-3) was accepted into the County Maintained-
Road System prior to City incorporation. Consequently, only the interior streets of these two
tracts will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System under Resolution No. 95-
Inasmuch as certain state funds are earmarked for maintenance of these publicly-maintained
streets, the process will make these streets eligible for those funds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These streets will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive
periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these
streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 7 years.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 95-
with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
r:~egdrpt\95~l 114\tr207033.962 AKC/1101
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN
STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-3, AND 29262)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF.,CULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WIringS, Dav-Bar I, a California General Partnership, and Dav-Bar II, a California
General Partnership, dedicated to' public use for street and public utility purposes certain
lots in Tracts No. 20703-3, and 22962, respectively;
WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted said offers of dedication
for street and public utility purposes within Tracts No. 20703-3, and 22962;
WHEREAS, the City desires to accept inW the City Maintained-SWeet System the public
improvements within all or portions of the public streets offered and accepted by the County of
Riverside as depicted in Exhibit "B" ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City Maintained-Street System
those streets or portions of public streets offered and accepted by the County of Riverside
described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the
streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside, into the City
Maintained-Street System as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of November, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATFF_~T:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
r:%agdrpt\95\l 114%tr207033.962 AKCI1101
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) as
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of November, 1995, by the
following vote:
0 COUNCILMF~MBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNC]IAdEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILIvn=~MBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt%95\l 114\tr207033.962 AKC/1101
EXHIBIT hA" TO RESOLUTION NO.
Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted
by the County of Riverside as indicated on Tram No.
20703-3, and 22962; and accepting subject public
sweets into the City Maintained-SWeet System as
described below:
A. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "J" inclusive,
as shown on Tract Map No. 20703-3, filed 29 June, 1988,
in Book 186 of Maps, Pgs 2028 Inc!., further described
as follows:
(Lot "A")
(Lots "B" & "C")
(Lots "D" & "E")
(Lot "F")
(Lot "G")
(Lot "H")*
(Lot "I")#
Portion of Roripaugh Road
Rosebay Court
Dandelion Court
Bolandra Court
Barberry Court
Portion of Nieolas Road
Portion of Winchester Road
B. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "D", inclusive,
as shown on Tract Map No. 22962, filed 18 February 1988, in
Book 180 of Maps, Pgs 32-36, Ind., further described
as follows:
(Lot "A")
(Lot "B")
(Lot "C")
(Lot "D")
Portion of Starling Street
Portion of Senna Court
Portion of Swallow Court
Valeriana Court
* Street is within existing City Maintained-Street System.
# Street is within existing State-Highway System.
r:\agdrptX95\l 114~tr207033.962 AKC/1101
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-
STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
,~
\
ROAD
TEIHECULAt AND
,,-~/
I RANCHO
MIJRRIETA
LINE
/ 71/
ITEM 10
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC ~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECI. LA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-3
PREPARED BY:/~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-3, AUTHORIZE
the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer Bond amounts
and the release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, ACCEPT the Faithful Performance
Warranty Bond Riders, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, the developer and surety..
BACKGROUND:
On June 28, 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Barratt American Incorporated,
c/o Coscan Davidson Homes
12865 Pointe Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and
subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds
issued by The American Insurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. 11126948717 in the amount of $496,000 to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. 11126948725 in-the amount of $131,000 to cover water system
improvements.
3. Bond No. 11126948733 in the amount of $134,000 to cover sewer system
improvements.
Bonds No. 11126948717, 11126948725, and 11126948733 in the amount of
$248,000, $65,500, and $67,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street,
water, and sewer improvements.
Bond No. 11126948741 in the amount of $35,400 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
r.\agdrpt~95\1114\tr207833.acc
The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved
plans:
1. Street, drainage, sewer and water improvements within Tract No. 20703-3.
2. Subdivision Monumentation
Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements. The Rancho California and Eastern
Municipal Water Districts have accepted their items of work. The Public Works Department
therefore recommends acceptance of the work, reduction in bond amounts to the 1 O-percent
warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period.
Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amounts as follows:
Street Improvements:
Water System Improvements:
Sewer System Improvements:
$446,400
~ 117,900
~ 120,600
The subdivider is submitting riders to the Faithful Performance Bonds changing the obligee'
from the County of Riverside to the City of Temecula and reducing the bonds for warranty
purposes in the following amounts:
Streets and Drainage improvements:
Sewer System Improvements:
Water System Improvements:
Bond No. 11127028972
Bond No. 11127029004
Bond No. 11127028998
,~35,450
9,350
7,700
The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute
after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements.
The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council
Resolution No. 95- at this time. The streets within the subdivision are Bolandra Court,
Barberry Court, Dandelion Court, Rosebay Court, and portions of Winchester Road, Nicolas
Road, and Roripaugh Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Location Map
Riders to Public Improvement Bonds (on file)
Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement (on file)
r.~agdq~t~95\1114\tr207833,acc
VICINITY MAP
NO SC~.LE
"rT"r -~
90
/~, ~
MVRRIETA /~
LINE
,D.
TRACT NO. 20703-3
Location
Map
ITEM 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREE~_~
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
T ~//Joseloh Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Release Grading Bond for Import to School Site
(Southeast of Winchester at Margarita Road Intersection)
PREPARED BY: ~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of Grading Bond for Import of Soils to Chapparal
High School Site, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Permittee and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
The Temecula Valley Union School District site (future Chapparal High School) bounded by
Winchester Road, the Santa Gertrudis Creek, Roripaugh Road, and Nicolas Road, required
import of suitable soils material to complete the site grading. A portion of the required
materials was imported from the proposed Campus Verde site at the southeast corner of
Winchester Road at Margarita Road.
A grading permit was issued to effect the removal of and transport of soils material to the high
school site. The conditions of the permit included environmental protection, erosion control
of the graded surfaces, and clean-up of the work area.
The grading contractor, Fleming Engineering, Inc., provided security for the satisfactory
completion of this work as follows:
Safeco Insurance Company of America Bond No. 5807106 in the amount of
~6,000.
The grading and related work has been satisfactorily completed and Public Works Staff
recommends the release of the subject grading bond.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENT:
Location Map
R:XagdrptX95\l 114\tvu~dbor.bnd
Borrow Site for High School
Location Map
Not to Scale
ITEM 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL I~~
CITY ATTORNEY n
FINANCE DIREC G
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Release Public Improvement Warranty, Labor and Material, and
Monument Bonds in Tract No. 21674-3
(Southwest of intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows
Parkway)
PREPARED BY:~, Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and
Material bonds for Street, Sewer and Water Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation
in Tract No. 21674-3, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer.
BACKGROUND:
On January 9, 1990, the City Council approved Final Tract Map No. 21674-3. Agreements
and Faithful Performance and Material Labor Bonds were filed by:
Mesa Homes (Now Kemper Community Development Company)
27555 Ynez Road, Suite 202
Temecula, Ca 92591
For the installation of street, sewer and water improvements. Accompanying the subdivision
agreements were surety bonds issued in the following amounts by:
Lumbermens Mutual Assurance Company
Bond No. 3S 687 481 00 in the amount of $310,500to cover street improvements.
Bond No. 3S 687 482 00 in the amount of $42,000 to cover water improvements.
Bond No. 3S 687 483 00 in the amount of $53,000 to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. 3S 687 484 00 in the amount of $12,200 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
-1- r:~agdrpt\95\l 114\tr216743 .fnl
Bonds No. 3S 687 481 00, 3S 687 482 00, and 3S 687 483 00 in the amounts of
$155,250.00, $21,000.00 and $26,500, respectively, to cover material and labor
amounts for street, water and sewer improvements.
On April 26, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the
one-year warranty period, and authorized the reduction in Faithful Performance bond amounts
for warranty purposes to the following amounts:
Streets: $31,050
Water System: 4,200
Sewer System: 5,300
Total: $40,550
Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have
been satisfactorily completed. Therefore it is recommended that the warranty bonds be
released.
The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been
completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of
the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows:
Bond No. 3S 687 484 O0 in the amount of $12,200 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
The developer is also required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the public
improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed
with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material bonds posted
by Lumbermens Mutual Assurance Company be released:
Bonds No. 3S 687 481 00, 3S 687 482 00, and 3S 687 483 00 in the
amounts of $155,250, $21,000, and $26,500, respectively, for street, water
and sewer improvements.
The streets within the subdivision are Corte Encinas, and portions of Meadows Parkway and
of Paseo De Las Olas. These streets will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System
by City Council resolution at a later date in concert with adjacent tracts nearing
completion.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
Location Map
-2- r:Xagdrpt\95\1114\tr216743 .tiff
Project Site
7'RAC7' M_a Z/~, 7,~ -3
)
NY~OTI-t~TTC.~, 7'DW!~I41p 7,5, ~-~MG~ 2iv',
Location Map
ITEM 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
///Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Release Grading Bond for Tract No. 21067.
(Northerly of Intersection of Pala Road at Loma Linda Road)
PREPARED BY:/Z~ Albert K,. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of Grading Bond for Tract No. 21067, and DIRECT
the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On September 18, 1991, the City Council approved Tract No. 21067 and entered into
subdivision improvement agreements with:
Kingsway Construction Corporation
2650 Camino Del Rio North
San Diego, CA 92108
Subdivision improvement bonds were posted by Insurance Company of the West as follows:
1. Bond No. 117 85 65 in the amount of $1,571,00 ($1,255,500, $149,500, and
$166,500, respectively, to cover faithful performance for street, and water and sewer
system improvements.
2. Bond No. 117 85 65 in the amounts of $787,750 ($628,000, $75,000, and
$82,750, respectively, to cover labor and materials for street, water and sewer system
improvements.
3. Bond No. 117 85 66 in the amount of $31,284for subdivision monumentation
Kingsway Construction Corporation subsequently lost control of the project. The new
developer for the subdivision is:
Santa Barbara 86 (Westmark Communities, Inc., General Partner)
One Columbia
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
r:~agdrpt\95\l 114~tr21067g.rsd
and they have submitted replacement agreements and securities, which securities were posted
by .Insurance Company of the West in'the same amounts and under the same bond numbers.
The City Councs'l accepted the substitute agreements and revised public improvement bonds
on October 18, 1994.
A bond for the rough grading phase of work was then posted by Safeco Insurance Company
on behalf of the following:
Buck Kemmis Equipment, Inc., and
Santa Barbara 86, a General Partnership,
Westmark Communities, Inc., General Partner,
as bond No. 5785013 in the amount of $539,500.00.
The grading and related work has been satisfactorily completed and Public Works Staff
recommends the release of the subject grading bond.
The affected streets, although not completed or accepted at this time, are Trotsdale Drive,
Canterfield Drive, Rein Court, Murfield Drive, and portions of Jedediah Smith Road and
Temecula Lane.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENT:
Location Map
Grading Bond (On file)
r:~agdrpt\95\l 114\tr21067g.r~d
V4~L~JO ~ 5TI~T~' ~
VICINITY MAP
l'lO JEALE
1~ . ~r5 , Z W
\
I'
TRACT NO. 21067
Loca':ion
Mao
ITEM 14
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
· CITY MANAGE~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
November 14, 1995
SUBJECT: Solicitation of Construction Bids for FY94-95 Annual Pavement
Management Project, PW95o06
PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of
Public Works to solicit public construction bids for FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management
Project No. PW95-06.
BACKGROUND:
In 1993 Dwight French & Associates developed a Pavement Management System Operations
Manual by investigating the existing conditions of each city street. This manual provided
procedures to estimate the existing conditions of local and arterial roadways throughout the
city, types of street improvement recommendations and cost/benefit analysis to prioritize
street repairs. The consultant also provided the city with a five year plan identifying the local
residential and arterial roadways and types of rehabilitation work needed for each year. The
FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management Rehabilitation Project is the city's first project using
a pavement management system. This project along with the slurry seal project will be an
annual program to maintain the roadways in the City.
The project plans and specifications are proposing two (2) types of pavement rehabilitation
which include an asphalt overlay with a stress relief membrane (geotextile fabric), and the
removal & reconstruction of the existing asphalt pavement. There are fifteen (15) roadways
to be rehabilitated, four (4) are arterial, which includes potions of Margarita Road, Pala Road,
Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, and eleven (11 ) are secondary/local residential streets
at various locations throughout the City.
The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is
ready to be advertised for construction bids. These plans and specifications are available for
review in the City Engineer's office.
The engineer's estimate for this project is $900,000.
pwO4~agdrpt\95\i 114\pw95-06 .bid
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project is a Capital Improvement Project which will be funded by Measure A.
pwO4\agd~t\95\l 114\pw95-06 .bid
' I
· ram - FY94-95 STREETS ~"~"
CITY OF TEMECULA
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ITEM 15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
_--~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Professional Services Agreement with Engineering Ventures, Inc. for
Rancho California Road and Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Improvement
Project No. 5
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for the design Of Rancho California Road and Santa Cecilia Drive
sidewalk improvement project to Engineering Ventures, Inc., for $10,950.00 and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $1,095.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount·
Authorize a transfer of $9,636.00of Development Impact Fees (Public Facilities) to the
Capital Projects Fund·
e
Appropriate $49,079 in the Capital Projects Fund to Account No. 210-165-661-5804
for the total costs to complete this project.
BACKGROUND:
Each fiscal year the State Public Utilities Code (Senate Bill 821) sets aside 2% of the Local
Transportation Funds in the County of Riverside to fund facilities for the exclusive use of
pedestrians and bicyclists. Riverside County Transportation Commission approved a total of
twenty-two proposals from various agencies throughout the County of Riverside and the City
of Temecula received approved for funding of two projects.
The engineer will be responsible for designing both projects which will provide a new sidewalk
on the north side of Rancho California Road between Lyndie Lane and the existing sidewalk
at Rancho California Plaza shopping center and a new sidewalk on the north side of Santa
Cecilia Drive between Mira Loma Drive and Cosmic Drive. The improvements on Rancho
California Road may be revised based on the final design and schedule of improvements that
r:\agdrpt\95\1114\engven.agr
will be constructed by the developers of the property at Rancho California Road and Lyndie
Lane.
The estimated total cost, consisting of design and construction is $12,432 for Rancho
California Road and $36,647 for Santa Cecilia Drive. RCTC/SB821 will fund 80% of the total
cost and the City will match the remaining 20%. Therefore, the costs are spread as follows:
Proiect Description
Total Cost $B821 Fund Citv's Matching Fund
Rancho California Road $12,432 $9,946 $2,486
Sidewalk improvements
Santa Cecilia Drive $36,647 $29,317 $7,330
Sidewalk improvements
FISCAL IMPACT:
Rancho California Road and Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 5 is a
Capital Improvement Project and will be funded by Development Impact Fees and SB821
funds. Adequate Development Impact Fees are available to cover the City's matching
requirement to complete this project.
Attachment:
1. Engineering Ventures, Inc. Contract
r:%agdrpt%95\l 114\engven,agr
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of November 14, 1995, between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Engineering Ventures, Inc.
("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the
parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on November 14, 1995, and
shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event
later than May 14, 1995, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth
in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in
Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently
and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment
rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent
on the above tasks. This am6unt shall not exceed Ten Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty
Dollars ($10,950.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved
as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in
connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth
herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City
Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the
manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is
given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve
additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no
event shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess
of this amount shall be approved by the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
' 1 ' r:\rfp\O40~e~fvenm.agr/ajp
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of
each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give
written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth
on the invoice.
SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREE~IENT WITHOUT
CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend
or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten
(10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately
cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends
or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void
or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section
3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement
shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for
any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by
written notice to the-Consultant. If such failure by-the Consultant to make progress in the
performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant' s control, and without
fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. "
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service
upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In
the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall
have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this
Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be
entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall
be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly
identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of
-2 - r. ~rfp~,O40\engvenm.sgr/ajp
City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to
examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as
necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, dam, documents, proceedings and activities
related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be
maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys,
notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant .to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused
or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to
computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by
the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall
not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a
location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify,
protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and
against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind
or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may
be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or falling to perform under
the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the
City.
9. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain
for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to
property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by
the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
InsuranCe Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
'3- r:\rfp\O40\~-~g~'enm.agr/ajp
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
and property damage.
(3)
Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
or disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied
or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
-4 - r: \rf~\O40~n~,entu. ag r/ajp
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty
(30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt
requested, has been given to the City.
e: Acceptability. of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be
on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City
before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may
provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements
effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Conshltant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly
independent contractor. The personnel performing the sentices under this Agreement on behalf
of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither
City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of
Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this
Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever
against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with
the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant-as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
.indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed
of State and Federal laws and regulations'which in any manner affect those employed by it or
in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant
shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its
officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the
Consultant to comply with this section.
'5- r:\~P\040\e~lve~m-alr/ajl~
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement
shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior
written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not
without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney,
voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to
interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or
relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court
order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court
order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work
performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City
retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any
deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and
to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by
Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right
by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service,
(ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal
Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United
States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address
of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by
Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
43 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
Engineering Ventures, Inc.
43500 Ridge Park Drive, Suite 202
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: Randolph F. Fleming
Principal
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent
of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this
Agreement, only Randolph F. Fleming shall perform the services described in this Agreement.
-{5- r:.\tf!~\040\~xgv~'~m.ngdajp
Randolph F. Fleming may use assistants, under his direct supervision, to perform some of the
services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior
to-the departure of Randolph F. Fleming from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave
Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement,
within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement,
Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and
including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City
Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant
shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the
services described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that
the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of
the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any
litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal
district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire
understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parries described in this
Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and
statements, oral or written, are merged into this' Agreement and shall be of no further force or
effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth
herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party
deems material.
'7 ' r: \rfpx. O40\~venm.agdajp
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREE~IENT. The person or
persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she
has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to
bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
gSr WITNESS WHEREOF, the pardes hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMZCULA
By
Attest:
Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
CONSULTA~F
~~dolph Fl~i
By: Engineering Ventures, In~t.nci~.
-8-
r:X~p~040Xea~vmtu.agr/aj~
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
%E!~IGINEF:RING
VENTUI~=S INC,
'LAND DL~NNING Z CIVIL ENGINEERING o LAN0 SURVEYING
October 19, 1995
Mr. Joe Kicak, R.C. E.
Director of Public Works
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Re.'
Rancho California Road and Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Improvements
Temecula, California
Dear Joe,
Thank you for selecting Engineering Ventures, Inc. to provide professional civil engineering
services for the above-referenced Capital Improvement Project. Based upon our discussions and
reviewing our estimated manhours, Engineering Ventures, Inc. is proposing a "not-to-exceed"
fee of $10,950.00. This fee is inclusive of all field time, office calculations, coordination,
design, drafting, specification preparations, meetings, and administrative assistance in providing
a complete "turn key" set of documents for the City of Temecula Public Works Department.
If you require any additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Randolph F. Fleming, R.C.E.
Principal
RFF:vlp
435C0 ~iOGE ~n,;~K C~Fv'E. SUITE 202 - TEMECULA. CA 92590 - (SOS) 599-6450 - ;~X 6SS-3569
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
CITY OF TEaMECULA RFP NO. 40
Rancho California Road and Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Improvements
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
October 3, 1995
PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
S 105.00/HOUR
CIVIL ENGINEERING
RESIDENT ENGINEER (LICENSED)
PROJECT COORDINATOR
DESIGNER
SENIOR TECHNICIAN
TECHNICIAN
DRAFTSMAN
SECRETARIAL/ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
$ 85.00/HOUR
$ 75.00/HOUR
$ 70.00/HOUR
$ 65.00/HOUR
$ 60.00/HOUR
$ 55.00/HOUR
$ 40.00/HOUR
LAND SURVEYING
DIRECTOR OF SURVEYING (LICENSED)
TWO-MAN CREW
$ 75.00/HOUR
$115.00/HOUR
MISCELLANEOUS COSTS
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE CALLS
MESSENGER (PICK-UP/DELIVERY)
MILEAGE EXPENSE
REPRODUCTION EXPENSE
MISCELLANEOUS REIMBURSABLES
DIRECT COST + 10%
$ 30.00/HOUR
$ 0.45/MILE
DIRECT COST + 10%
DIRECT COST + 10%
ITEM 16
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVED ~~/~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRE
CITY MANAG
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Walcott Corridor Reimbursement Agreements with R.C.W.D. for Work
Performed During the Construction, Project PW94-10
PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve reimbursement agreement with the Rancho California Water
District for the cost of relocation certain water improvements made necessary by the Walcott
Corridor, Project PW94-10.
BACKGROUND:
During the design of the Walcott Corridor Project it was determined that portions of Walcott
Lane would have to be lowered to provide for vehicle site distance. This vertical grade change
will require underground .utilities to be relocated. Rancho California Water District has provided
the City plans and specifications of their proposed water facilities improvements and the City
has incorporated them into the Walcott Corridor Project construction documents.
This reimbursement agreement requires RCWD to reimburse the City 100% of the costs for
the relocation and adjustments of the water improvements included in this project. RCWD
agrees to provide and pay for inspection of all new and relocated facilities that are needed for
the Walcott Corridor. The amount of reimbursement for the Walcott Corridor is based on the
bid prices as specified under the contract awarded by the City to the Hemet Manufacturing
Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction for the street improvements. This agreement states
that RCWD will reimburse the City fifty percent (50%) of their cost forty-five (45) days after
RCWD receives notice from the City that the relocation of the water facilities has begun. The
remaining fifty-percent (50%) of the reimbursement will be due and payable within thirty (30)
days after the entire project is accepted as complete by the City and RCWD.
On August 24, 1995 the bids were opened and the total cost of the water facilities bid items
which will be reimburse by RCWD is estimated at $647,453.00.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All costs associated with the reimbursement agreement
California Water District with no fiscal impact to the City.
will be paid
for by the Rancho
pwO4~agdrpt~95~ 1114~ow94-10~9410rcwd .agr
Attachment:
RCWD Reimbursement Agreement
pwO4~agdrpt~,95~ 1114~pw94-10~9410rcwd .agr
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECULA
WALCOTT CORRIDOR
PROJECT NO. PW94-10
AND
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of September 26, 1995, between
the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and
Rancho California Water District, a California Water District and existing and operating
under Division 13 of the California Water Code, hereinafter referred to as "RCWD". in
consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto
mutually agree as follows:
Section I. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. The purpose of this Agreement is
to establish the reimbursement to CITY by RCWD for the cost of relocation certain water
improvements made necessary by the Walcott Corridor, Project No. PW94-10, hereinafter
referred to as "PROJECT".
Section II. RCWD shall reimburse CITY for one hundred percent (100%) of the
costs (hereinafter referred t,o as "REIMBURSEMENT"), for the relocation and adjustments of
certain water improvements within the PROJECT area that are affected by the PROJECT.
The costs for the REIMBURSEMENT to CITY by RCWD shall include the following items as
shown within the attached Bid Result Spreadsheet:
A. Water Items
Extended Bid Amounts
Bid Items W-1 b
through W-37, excluding
Item W-1 d.
647,453.00
SECTION III. Costs are based on construction bids received for the PROJECT under
"Water Items" shown within the attached Bid Result Spreadsheet. CITY has evaluated and
analyzed all bids received and selected the lowest responsible bidder for the PROJECT as
Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction (hereinafter referred to as
"CONTRACTOR"). RCWD has reviewed the bids and approved CITY's selection of CITY's
CONTRACTOR prior to the commencement of the work on the PROJECT.
RCWD shall maintain as a contingency an 'amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the total
estimated costs of relocating the water facilities to account for unforeseen change orders.
Prior to the approval of any change orders associated with the relocation of these facilities,
CITY shall obtain approval from RCWD before authorizing CONTRACTOR to proceed. CITY
shall make payment to CONTRACTOR for work performed. Actual costs shall be identified
1 agmts\rcwd9410.agr/seh 092195
and billed to RCWD for payment on the following basis:
A. The Construction Schedule for PROJECT provides that the water
facilities relocation shall occur on or about 10 days after the Notice to
Proceed with the PROJECT has been issued. Fifty percent (50%) of the
REIMBURSEMENT shall be due and payable to CITY forty-five (45) days after
RCWD receives notice from the City that relocation of the water facilities has
begun.
B. The remaining fifty percent (50%) REIMBURSEMENT to CITY by
RCWD shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after the entire
PROJECT is accepted as complete by CITY and RCWD.
SECTION IV. It is acknowledged that RCWD has reviewed and approved all CITY plans
and specifications for the relocation of the water improvements and has approved the bid
amount as reasonable. Management and administration of the terms expressed herein shall
be performed by CITY for the PROJECT. CITY agrees to designate Mr. Don Spagnolo as
the contact for CITY in regards to this agreement. RCWD agrees to designate Mr. Steve
Brannon as a point of contact for RCWD to facilitate the reimbursements identified herein.
SECTION V. INSPECTION. RCWD shall provide and pay for inspection of all new and
relocated facilities specifically, Bid Items W-1 b through W-37 excluding Item W-1 d.
SECTION VI. NOTICES. All notices under this Agreement shall be sent as follows:
RCWD:
Rancho California Water District
42135 Winchester Road
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: Steve Brannon, Development Engineering Manager
CITY:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer
Either party may change its address for notices by notifying the other party. All
notices given at the most recent address specified shall be deemed to have been properly
given.
2 egmts\rcwd9410.agr/seh 092195
This Agreement is dated as of the date set forth above.
District:
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
By'~~, ~/~ r~
By: ~Tohz~ :E. lJez~z~i<Ja~:
City:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By:
ATTEST:
3 agmts\rcwd9410.agr/seh 092195
CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PWg4-10 WALCO'FF CORRIDOR
BID RESULTS - AUGUST 24, 1995 1
Item Item Unit Eel. Unit Total
No. QuanL Price Arncunt
1 M,',hilrzation LS. I 45,000.00 at,000.00
2 Truffle C,~ntrd LS. 1 10,000.00 10,000.00
3 Cleer&Gnjb LS. I 125,500.00 125,5(X).00
4 Uncteseifeed Eecavalion C.Y. 84,775 2.00 18g,550.00
5 Nluvil/Excevslim C.Y. 53,t50 1.00 53,150.00
6 Impeted Bavow C.Y. g,000 1.00 g,000.00
I Asphalt Ccxtcmte TONS 5,252 26.00 136,rt2.00
8 C.A.B. C.Y. 5,580 19.00 t01,920.00
g CenslNct Tepered Inlet & Rume Down EA. 7 gSO.00 6,650.00
10 Ccnet. 6' A.C. Dike per COT Std. No. 211 LF. 4,875 2.00 g,350.00
11 Const 4' P.C.C. Driveway Approecrt S.F. 1,068 4.00 4,272.00
12 Conet. Cone. V-Ditch per Det. ShL 2 LF. 1,22~ 8.00 57,824.00
t3 Conet. Conc. Terreee Dreln per Det. Sht. 2 LF. 670 · 9.50 6,385.00
14 Conet. Cone. Down Drain per Det. Sht. 2 LF. 65 12.00 780.00
15 Insill Facing Fip-Rap Energy DieSpetor C.Y. 21 44.00 924.00
16 InslNI 1/2 Ton ~ Energy Oistpatc~ C.Y. 1,18g 42.00 4g,086.00
17 Instadlll4TonFi~EnergyDiselpator C.Y. 6g4 45.00 31,230.00
18 Instell 12' R.C.P. Class IV LF. 221 22.00 4,882.00
19 Insill 12" C.S.P. 18 Geuge Min. LF. 124 22.00 2,728.00
20 Cottit. Pipe HeedweJI Clime118 Std. DSg EA. 25 g50.00 23,750.00
21 Const. V-Ditch to Pipe Tmne. Sht. 2 EA. 10 125.00 2.000.00
22 Cormt. Cone. Too Ditch per DeL on 8hL 2 LF. 400 6.00 2,400.00
23 Instell 18' C.S.P. Gauge per Ran LF. 123 30.00 3,eg0.00
24 irisill 42" P,-C.P. D-2000 LF. 100 88.00 8,800.00
25 InItldleOeR. C.P.D-1800 LF. 474 113.00 53,582.00
28 Ins~JI 6r R.C.P. D-t400 LF. 240 125.00 30,000.00
27 Instell 5t" x ;]8' C.S.P. Arch Pipe LF. 616 65.00 40,O40.00
28 Inetall er c.s.P. 12 Geuge Min. LF. 44 100.00 4,400.00
29 Conet. M.H.No.t RCFC Std. MH 251(Mod.) EA. 1 3,000.00 3,000.00
30 Const. Sireight Hesdwsll Sht. 0 EA I 2,g00.00 2,g00.00
31 Cenet. S~Nght HeechmiJI ShL 7 F.A. I 2,800.00 2,800.00
32 Ccnlt. S~sight Heeclvedl Sht. 8 EA. 2 3,000.00 6,000.00
33 Const. 'L' Type Heedwell Sht. 3 EA. 1 4,000.00 4,000.00
34 C~nst. %' Type Heecheell Sht. g EA. 1 4,800.00 4,800.00
35 Const. W'mg Type Heedwell ShL 8 & 7 EA. 2 2,900.00 5,800.00
38 Const. Splesh Well Sht. 2 LF. 36 t7.00 612.00
37 Instell 24'C.S.P. Fiser per Detell Sht. 13 EA. I 750.00 750.00
38 Ccn~t.A.C. OveredeDminCOTNo. 300 EA. 1 1,200.00 1,200.00
3g ConsL Cone. Pipe Ccilsr RCFC Std. MS(~ EA. 2 800.00 1,200.00
40 Inetell Cerlonite Ma~em EA. g 40.00
41 Eroiofi Con!l~ ACRE 7.5 1,700.00 12,750.00
42 ~ Eroioel Conllol LS. 1 5,000.00 5,000.00
43 WillowMitigaliofi LS. 1 1,000.00 1,000.00
44 Con~t. Chein Unk Fence RCFC Det. M801 LF. 275 13.00 3,575,00
45 NPDES SWPPP Ran LS. 1 5,000.00 5,000.00
,S-t Install 4' Single Yeliaw Slripe LF. 8,453 0.10 645.30
S-2 Insill 12' White Stop Line LF. 42 1.00 42.00
S-3 Install 4° White Fight Eclge Line LF. 325 0.15 48.75
S-4 Inslell DI~I. Yellow Sffipe LF. 2,1gg 0.55 1,20g.45
S-5 Inktell RI 'Stop' Sign EA. 2 145.00 2g0.00
S-6 Insill R2 (See Plan for Poeted Speed) EA. 6 130.00 780.00
S-7 Instell Type W-15 'Rood Netrows' Sign EA. I 130.00 130.00
S-8 Instell Type W-3 EA 8 130.00 !,040.00
S-g Instell Type R2-4 (30 MPH) F.,.A. 1 130.00 130.00
S-10 Instell Type R2-5 'Reduce Speed Aheecr EA. I 130.00 130.00
S-11 Inetadl Type R-3 'End 30 MPH' EA. I 130.00 130.00
S-12 Inet/ITypeW31R&3N-SMeff4rStd. e04 EA. 4 215.00' 860.00
S-13 Instell Type F-I DetineetOr EA. 52 40.00 2,080.00
S-14 InltNI Sb'es~ Neme Sign Stcl. 404 & 405 EA. 5 215.00 1,0/5.00
S-15 InSt'dl Type W-2 Sign EA. 2 130.00 260.00
S-18 Instell 'St~o" Legend C.T.M. Figure6-40 EA. 2 85.00 130.00
S-17 Remove Sign, Selvege & Deliver to Yard EA. 2 30.00 60.00
SUBTOTAL: $1,06g, 1 ~4.50
W-ta
W-lb
W-lc
--w-ld
,'h
W-3a
W-3b
W4
W-5
W-8
W-7
W-9
W-10
W-11
W-12
W-13
W-14
W-15
W-16
W-17
W-18
W-19
W-20
W-21
W-22
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
W-28
W-2B
W-,IO
W-31
~t.32
4
W-37
Relufoish 30" CML&C steel pipe
Remove & dispose of eximing 30' CML&C
Instedl new 30" CML&C steel pipe
Inetedl new30' CML&C steel pipe
Remove & dispose oe emetmg 18' CML&C
Install new lee CMI..&C steel pipe
Remove and dispose of existrag 8= CML&C
Install new 8' CML&C ateel pipe
Install 6' F,H. Asiafrilly pet RW-7
lnstadl 4° AVIAR Assembly per RW-11
Inadall Cm¢. 'lhn~mt Block I:M/-2e ~t 26A
Ina4/I 1' AVlAR A88ewnbly per RW-6
Inetall new 30" Butterfly Vadve, Clsms 250
Install 16' B'Ry Valve Class 250
Install new 8" Wedge VeJvos, (3ass 2130
Instaft 2' AVIAR Assembly per RW-10
In~edl 8" 45 Degree Angle
In, all 30'x30'x30" Steed Tee
Inmcll 30'x30'xB' Tee
Install 30'xlr Reduce
Instaft le' Steed Casing per FIW-23
Not Used
Not Used
Adjust to Gn~cle
Reccn. Ex. Water 8etv. to New WetMine
Protect In Place
InllaJI Bind Flange
Sawcut Ex. A.C. Pavement & Replace
Insall Inauited Test Connections & Range
Install Test Stad~n per RWJ, OA
Install 6' F.H. Assembly per RW-aA
Install 30'xr Welded Saddle
Install Ancha- Ring and Certc. 11rust Block
InsIll 4° Steel or Numinum I-ltghline Pipe
Connect Ex. 0naite WaL Serv, to Highline
CennectHigfdinePipetoOutietoi'Ex. FH
Install A.C. Berm Pipe Protection St.
Inltedl A.C. Benn Pipe Protectie~ SW
InmaJl GriM:led D4rt Pipe Protecticeq at {:)five
Inmadl 4' Wedge Vedve
Insl~l Pipe Suppert per RW-~7
Install 1' Wmer Service per RW-13
TOTAL LESS W-re AND W-l d:
TOTAL LESS W-l b AND W-l c:
LS. 1 400,000.00 400,000.00
LS. I 40,000.00 40,000.00
LF. 3,520 g0,00 316,800.00
LF. 786 100.00 78,600.00
LS. I 10,000.00 10,000.00
LF. 4.q8 35.00 18,065.00
LS. I 15,000.00 15,oo0.00
LF. 2,642 25,00 66,0~0.00
EA. 2 4,100.00 8,200.00
EA. 3 6,000.00 18,000.00
Include 20 0.00 0.00
EA. 3 1 ,g00.00 5,700.00
EA. 2 15,000,00 30,000.00
EA, 2 4,500.00 9,000.00
EA. 3 850,00 2,550.00
EA 2 2,200,00 4,,100,00
Inctude 6 0,00 0.00
Inctude I 0.00 0,00
Include I 0.00 0,130
Include 2' 0.00 0.00
LF. 80 75,00 8,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
Include I 0,00 0.00
Include 1 0.00 0.00
Include 9 0.00 0,00
8. F. 3,550 8.00 21,300.00
EA. 13 200.00 2,600.00
EA. 5 3,500,00 17,500.00
EA. 4 1,000.00 4,000.00
LF. 6,280 t .00
F.A. 19 300.00 5,700.00
EA. I 100,130 100.00
EA. 14 350.00 4,g00.00
EA. 3 e00.00 1,800.00
F..A. 8 1.00 8,00
EA. I 1,500.00 1,500,00
SU BTOTAL: St, 126,053.00
$1,716,637.50
$e47,453.00
II s~,.3a,437.5o I
ITEM 17
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Professional Geotechnical Services Contract with Law/Crandall, Inc for
Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate' Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for Professional Geotechnical Services for the Walcott Corridor,
Project PW94-10 to Law/Crandall, Inc. for $34,565.00 and authorize the Mayor to
execute the contract.
.Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $3,456.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROOND:
On June 13, 1995, the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and
authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. The Walcott
Corridor Project will provide an all weather surface road (two travel lanes) from Nicolas Road
to La Serena Way by way of Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos, and Walcott Lane. This project will
raise and lower the existing grades of all the streets throughout the project which will require
soil testing throughout the project. Law/Crandall, Inc. submitted a proposal to perform
geotechnical services for the Walcott Corridor Project for in an amount not to exceed
$34,565.00. Law/Crandall, Inc. is on the City's soils consultant list and are selected on a
rotational basis. The Soils Engineer will provide grading, backfill, paving observations, field
and laboratory testing, engineering consultation and a final project report as described in
Exhibit "A", Scope of Services of the attached agreement.
pwO4~agd~t'~95'xl 114X9410soH.agr
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded by Measure A and Development
Impact Fees. Funds are available for the professional services contract of $34,565.00and the
contingency of $3,456.50 for a total of cost of $38,021.50.
Attachment:
Professional Services Contract
pwO4~agdrpfi95 ~ 1114 ~941 (boll .agr
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREE1VIENT, is made and effective as of November 14. 1995, between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Law/CrandaH, Inc.,
("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the
parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on November 14, 1995 and shall
remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than November 14, 1996, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth
in Exhibit A, attached hemto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in
Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competcntly
and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utiliTecl by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment
rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit' B, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent
on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed THIRTY FOUR THOUSAND FIVE
HUNDRED SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($34,565.00) for the total term of the
Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in
connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth
herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City
Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the
manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is
given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve
additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no
event shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.130). Any additional work in excess
of this amount shall be approved by the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
' l ' r. X~ipXproje~\pw94-10~oi/. ngrlajp
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of
each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give
written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth
on the invoice.
SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT
CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend
or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten
(10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately
cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends
or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void
or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section
3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement
shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for
any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by
written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the
performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant' s control, and without
fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service
upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In
the event. that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall
have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this
Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be
entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall
be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly
identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of
-2-
City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to
examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as
necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, dam, documents, proceedings and activities
related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be
maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of Final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys,
notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused
or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to
computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by
the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer ~es.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall
not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a
location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify,
protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and
against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind
or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may
be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under
the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the
City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain
for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to
property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by
the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 00131 (Fxl. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
-3-
r:. \cila'~a~'ojem \1n94-10~oih. qrla~
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less
O)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
and property damage.
(3)
Employer's.Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
or disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied
or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any .claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty
(30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt
requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to-be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be
on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City
before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may
provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements
effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly
independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf
of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither
City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of
Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this
Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever
against City, or bind City in axty manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with
the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGALRESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed
of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or
in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant
shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its
officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity cccasioned by failure of the
Consultant to comply with this section..
'5- r.\cip~projccts~pv/~4-10~oils.afr/ajp
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement
shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior
written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not
without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney,
voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to
interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or
relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court
order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court
order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work
performed thereunder or with ~t to any project or property located within the City. City
retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any
deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and
to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by
Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right
by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service,
(ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal
Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United
States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address
of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by
Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Califomia 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
Law/Crandall, Inc.
Robert A. Torres, Principal Engineer
9177 Sky Park Court
San Diego, California 92123.
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent
of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this
Agreement, only Law/Crandall.Inc. shall perform the services described in this Agreement.
Law/Crandall, Inc., may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the
services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior
to the departure of Robert A. Tortes, Principal Engineer from Consultant's employ. Should he
or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this
Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this
Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up
to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between
the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during. the term of this Agreement, Consultant
shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the
services described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that
the laws of the State of California shall govern the fights, obligations, duties and liabilities of
the paxties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any
litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal
district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire
understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parlies described in this
Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and
statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or
effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth
herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party
deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or
persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she
has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to
bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Attest:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
-7-
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
CONSULTANT
LAW/CRANDALL, INC.
Signature
By:
Robert A/Torres,
Principal Engineer
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
~.XHII~IT "A"
SCOPe. OF SF. RVlCFS
PW 94-10 WALCOTT CORRIDOR
GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION AuND TESTING
The estimated fee is based on the indicated hours and laboratory testing. If we are requested for more hours
than estimated, additional time will be necessary and will be billed on a time-and-expense basis in accordance
with the rates given in the attached E,x. hibit "B" Payment SchedUle. We require a minimum charge of 3 hours
per site visit. No additional charges will be made for travel to the site, unless we are requested for less than 3
hours per site visit.
Our area of expertise does not include construction safety. Accordingly, our services will not include review of.
nor responsibility for, construction safety during the course of this project.
Grading Observation and Field Testing
Services for this phase will include grading observation and testing by our field teclmician. Density tests will be
performed on the fill materials using sand cone (ASTM Designation D1556-82) or nuclear (ASTM D2922-8 l)
test methods. We estimate 240 technician-hours may be necessary for this phase of the overall 180-day
construction duration.
Backfill Observation and Field Testing
Services for this phase will include periodic observation and testing of the water and storm drain utility trench
bac~'ill. Our field tech. mcian will perform density tests using sand cone or nuclear test methods. We estimate
96 tecbmician-hours may be necessary for this phase of the project.
Paving Observation and Testing
Services. for this phase will include observation and testing of the pavement subgrade preparation. base course
placement and compaction. and asphalt concrete placement and compaction. We estimate 160 technician-hours
may be necessary for this phase of construction.
Laboratory Testing
Our laboratory testing will include three each of R-values (Cal 301), sieve analyses, sand equivalents, and
durability indexes, and four laboratory compaction tests (ASTM D 1557-91). ..
Engineering Consultation
Services for this phase will include review of prior geotechnical recommendations provided by others, periodic
field observation of the grading operatiois, attendance at 1 project meeting, and providing supplemental
recommendations as necessary. We estimate approximately 20 hours of project engineer time and about 10
hours of principal engineer time for the project.
Final Compaction Report
Our final compaction report will be submitted within 15 days after completion of the project and will include
a summary of our field observations and testing, and will present the results of the areas tested. The report will
include a plan indicating the approximate locations of our tests.
:, forn~,ARG-04 R:v i.'2"_92_ EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
~XHInlT "B"
PAYMFNT SCHF. DUI
PROJECT NO. PW94-10 WALCOTT CORRIDOR
GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION AND TESTING
Hourly Rates:
Soil Technician - Regular time ........................................................$ 55
Soil Technician - Overtime .............................................................$ 65
Laboratory Technician ..................................................................$ 55
Senior Laboratory Technician .........................................................$ 75
Staff Engineer/Staff Geologist .........................................................$ 80
Project Engineer/Project Geologist/Sr. Technical Writer ........................S 95
Senior Engineer/Senior Geologist .....................................................$1. 15
Principal Engineer/Principal Geologist ..............................................$135
Word Processor ...................................................................' .......$ 50
Drafter ......................................................................................$ 55
per hour
per hour
per hour
per hour
per hour
per hour
per hour
per hour
per hour
per hour
Grading Observation and Field Testing (240 hours) ......................................................
Backfill Observation and Field Testing (96 hours) ........................................................
Paving Observation and Testing (160 hours) ..............................................................
Laboratory Testing (3 R-values @ $220 ca., 3 sieve analyses @ $65 ca.,
3 sand equivalents @ $85 ca.,.3 durability indexes @ $115 ca., and
4 laboratory compaction tests @ $145 ca.) .........................................................
Engineering Consultation (20 hours Project Engineer and 10 hours Principal) .....................
Final Compaction Report (Lump Sum) .....................................................................
:rOTAL ...................................................................
$13,200
5,280
8,800
2,035
3,250
534,565
Payment is due within 30 days of the invoice date.
2: form.s~ARG-O~ Rev I;2,2/92
ITEM 18
CITY OF TEMECUL~ITY MANAGER~
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: ~ Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: November 14, 1995
SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Right-Of-Way Weed Control Pre-Emergent and
Post-Emergent Applications, Project No. PW95-24
PREPARED BY: ~z~ Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Award a contract for Right-Of-Way Weed Control Pre-Emergent and Post-Emergent
Applications, Project No. PW95-24to Pestmasters Services of Temecula in the amount
of $25,755.47 and ~uthorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $2,575.55 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On September 26, 1995 the City Council approved the plans and specifications for Right-Of-
Way Weed Control Pre-Emergent and Post-Emergent Applications, Project No. PW95-24, and
authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for construction.
The bids were publicily opened on November 2, 1995. This project includes Pre-Emergent and
Post-Emergent Right-Of-Way Weed Control spraying in order to maintain a' neat, weed free
right-of-way and in order to insure visibility at intersections.
The engineer's estimate for this project was $35,000.
Two (2) bids were received for the project and the results are as follows:
Base Bid
1. Pestmasters Services ........................ $25,755.47
2. Diversified Landscape ....................... $34,926.63
The construction schedule is 45 working days. Work is expected to begin in November, 1995
and be completed by the end of December, 1995.
-1- r:\agdrpt\95~1114\pw95-24.awd/ajp
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded from the Public Works Street Maintenance Account No. 100-164-
601-5402. The total project amount is ~28,331.02 which includes the contract amount of
$25,755.47 plus 10% contingency of $2,575.55.
Attachments:
1. Contract
-2- r:%agdrpt%95\l 114%pw95-24.awdlajp
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
Project No. PW95-24
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED CONTROL
PRE-EMERGENT AND POST-EMERGENT APPLICATIONS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of November, 1995, by and
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and
PESTMASTERS SERVICES of TEMECULA, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled Project No. PW95-24
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED CONTROL, PRE-EMERGENT AND POST-EMERGENT
APPLICATIONS, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments
thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications
(Latest Edition) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications,
and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction,
including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative
-Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General
Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the
General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No.
PW95-24 RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED CONTROL, PRE-EMERGENT AND POST-EMERGENT
APPLICATIONS. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the
publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General,
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW95-
24 RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED CONTROL, PRE-EMERGENT AND POST-EMERGENT
APPLICATIONS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in
lieu of such conflicting portions.
CONTRACT CA-1 r:~cip\projects\pw95-24\contract
e
e
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not
in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed
completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless
otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools,
equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility' and transportation services required for the following:
Project No. PW95-24
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED CONTROL
PRE-EMERGENT AND POST-EMERGENT APPUCATIONS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees
to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: TWENTY
FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE DOLLARS and FORTY-SEVEN CENTS
($25,755.47), the total amount of the base bid'.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed THIRTY (30)
working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction
shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except
that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written
order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency
as established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS.
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
Ae
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit
to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
CONTRACT CA-2 r:~cip\projects~pw95-24\contrect
e
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30)
days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall
be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work
completed. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth
(30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final
payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made
sixty (60) days after completion of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-
year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided
by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts
Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure
warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the
following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000-$75,000
$75,000-$500,000
Over $500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or
negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip\projects\pw95-24\contract
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation
as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount
of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a
release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of
persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly
or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted
by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or
employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and
Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her
employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice
-Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in
an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which
has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its
CONTRACT CA-4 r:~cip~projects~pw95-24\contract
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the
safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in
such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be. subject to final
inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections.
Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the
work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will
not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion,
national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed
by the law of the State of California.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. Contractor shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336, as amended.
'TERM
This Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year beginning November 14, 1995 and
ending the 14th day of November, 1996, unless terminated or extended as provided.
The City reserves the right of option to extend this Contract and to renegotiate rates
from year to year commencing the first day of July of each fiscal year. In no event
beyond the 14th day of November, 1999.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage
prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract
Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip~projects\pw95-24\contract
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip~projects~pw95-24%contract
ITEM 19
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~/-)
FINANCE DIREC OR
CITY MANAGEI~~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Award of 'Contract for City Wide Right-Of-Way Tree Trimming Program
PREPARED BY:~ Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Reverse the decision to award Citywide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program to Arbor-
Pro Tree Service.
2. Award a contract for Citywide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program to L. Williams
Landscaping, Inc. for $16,880.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
3. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $1,688.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
This project includes 279 trees to be pruned by the City of Temecula's Pruning Standards.
Three (3) bids were publicly opened on September 27, 1995 and results are as follows:
Base Bid
1. Arbor-Pro Tree Service ....................... $12,555.00
2. L. Williams Landscaping, 'lnc .................... 16,880.00
3. West Coast Arborist, Inc ........................ 25,947.00
During the pre-construction meeting of October 27, 1995, Arbor-Pro Tree Service was notified
that the use of tree climbing spurs were prohibited for any Citywide Tree Trimming Program.
Upon that notification Arbor-Pro Tree Service submitted a letter to the City that an additional
~ 14.00 per tree would be required due to additional time required to trim each tree. Total
additional costs would bring their bid to $16,461.00. (See Attachment A)
In addition to the request for additional funding Arbro-Pro Tree Service could not comply with
the construction schedule set in the terms of the contract. (See Attachment B)
-1- r:~agdrpt~95~1114\treetrim.awd/skg
L. Williams Landscaping Inc. can start work upon award of the contract. L. Williams
Landscaping Inc. has performed satisfactory work for the City on past projects.
The construction schedule is 18 working days. Work is expected to begin in November, 1995
and be completed by the end of December, 1995.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded from the Public Works Street Maintenance Account No. 100-164-
601-5402. The total project amount is $18,568o00which includes the contract amount of
$16,880.00 plus 10% contingency of $1,688.50.
Attachments:
1. Attachment A
2. Attachment B
3. Contract
-2- r:%agdrpt\95\1114\treetrim.awd/skg
$LIBMITTEDTO:
ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE
P.O. BOX 113
PH~(9oq) 674-7432 / 676-6798
CAL. STATE CONTRACTOR #C61-910122278
PRO~CONTRAC'r
DATE
TERMS
City of Temecula
Temecul.a, Ca. 92590
Attn: Brad
Oct. 30, 1995
Pay on completion.
City of Temecula
Temecula, Ca.
t PO. NO. FIELDADVI$C~ Jackie
JOSNO.
Project no. FY95-96-07
This is to notify the City of Temecula that an addition of $14.00
per tree will be added to our proposal upon notification that
spurs will not be used during tree trimming.
Tree work will require much .more time and therefore requires
raising the price per tree.
Total bidWill be-~59.00 per.tree.
279 trees for $16,461.00.
0C 'r 3 1 799~
Page 1 of 1
Tneunde,'s~nedag,,..;..k.,,i_~...,, ~ I ~nU".co,xrad.
ACCEPTED BY
PRK;E I $
~UBMff"r~DTO:
ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE
P.O. BOX 113
TEMEClIA, CA 92593
PH/~c/oq ) 6747432 / 676-6798
CAL. STATE CONTRACTOR ~C61-910122278
PROPOSAL/CONTRACT
City of Temecula
Temecula, Ca. 92590
Attn: Brad
DArE NOv; 2, 1995 I p.O. NO. FIELDAi:NISO~
TERMS JOe NO.
Project No. FY95-96-07
This is to notify the City of Temecula that we are regretfully
withdrawing our proposal at this time due the fact that we had
made previous commitments and are unable to complete them in
time to begin our work with the City of Temecula.
So in all fairness we feel it would be in the best interest
of the City of Temecula, to choose another contractor.
Again we appologize for any inconvience this may have caused.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
Jackie Madariaga
ACCEPTED B"f' ~ C
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 14th day of November, 1995 by and between the City
of Temecula a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the
laws of the State of California ("City"), and L. Wi!liams Landscaping, Inc. hereinafter called
the "Contractor". In consideration of their mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree
as follows:
1. The Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City hereinafter set forth, hereby
agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, labor and materials necessary to perform and complete
in a workmanlike manner, all of the work required for the construction of the improvements
described in Work Order No. FY95-96-07 attached hereto. The work shall be performed
according to the City of Temecula's Procedures For Informal Bidding For Public Works SWeet
Maintenance Work Orders of $25.000 and Less than $75.000. Fiscal Year 1994-95. ("Informal
Bidding Procedures").
Where the Work Order or the Informal Bidding Procedures describe portions of the work
in general terms, but not in complete detail, the latest version of the City of Temecula,
Department of Public Works Standards Drawings for Public Works Construction ("Standard
Drawings"), and Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including al
supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern
California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter,
"Standard Specifications") shall control. Copies of the Standard Specifications are available
from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
In case of any conffict between the Standard Drawings and the Standard Specifications,
the Standard Drawings shall control. Where the Work Order, the Informal Bidding Procedures,
the Standard Drawings, or the Standard Specifications only describe portions of the work in
general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and
installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used.
2. The City, in consideration of the performance of this Contract, agrees to pay the
Contractor and the Contractor agrees to accept in full satisfaction for the work done hereunder
the sum of SIXTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY and NO CENTS dollars
($16.880.00), in accordance with the bid of the Contractor which sum shall be paid to the
Contractor within the lime and in the manner set forth in the Informal Bidding Procedures, final
payment to be made within thirty-five (35) days after filing Notice of Completion of said work
and improvement with the Riverside County Recorder.
R: ~nalm\tr~trim~lwillla ms. AGR/I 1/95ajp
3. Contractor, by executing the Contract, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor COde
which requires every employer be insured against liability for
Workman' s compensation or undertake self-insurance in
accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply
with such provisions before commencing the performance of the
work of this Contract."
4. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or
delivering materials to the site, 'shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to
save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, its officers, employees, and agents, against any
and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contmctor's employees included) and damage to
property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the
operations conducted by Principal, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole
active negligence or sole wffiful misconduct of the City.
5. Contractor and subcontractors shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited
to City business license.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto
subscribed and affixed by the [Mayor/City Manager] and attested to by the City Clerk, both
thereunto duly authorized, 'and the Contractor has hereunto subscribed this Contract the day,
month and year hereinabove written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
L. Williams Landscaping, Inc.
1338 N. Melrose Dr., Suite M
Vista, CA 92083
By:
Name:
Title:
RAmaint\tre~trimXiwilliams. AGR/l 1/95ajp
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
(Dam)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
R: ~-naint\treetrlm~!williams. AGR/11/95 ajp
PROJECT NO. FY95-96-07
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
This is to certify that , (hereinafter the
"undersigned") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that it has paid in full for all materials,
supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the undersigned or by any
of the undersigned's agents, employees, or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its
contract with the City of Temecula with regard to the building, erection, construction or repair of that
certain work of improvement known as:
, situated in the Community of ,
City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract
which would constitute Founds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any unpaid sums owning to
the undersigned.
Further, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned
does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and
each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or causes of action which exist or might exist
in favor of the undersigned and the City of Temecula or which relate in any way to work performed by
the undersigned with regard to the above referenced construction project.
Funher, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of and waives the benefits of 1542
of the Civil Code of the State of California which provides: "A general release does not extend to clairrm
which the crediWr does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release,
which if known to him must have materially effected settlement with the debtor".
This release is intended to be a full and general release of any and all claims which the
undersigned now has or may, in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or its agents and
employees with regard to any matter arising from the construction or the above referenced project or the
contract between the City and the Contractor with respect thereto whether such claims are now known
or unknown or are suspected or unsuspected.
Dated:
By:
R:Xmaint\tr~ctrim~iwilihms.AGR/l 1/95ajp
ITEM 20
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~ ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRE ~
CITY MANAGERC~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
:~,Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14,1995
Award of Contract for FY95-96 City Wide A.C. Street Repair
Project No. PW95-20
PREPARED BY: ~$~,~ Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Award a contract for FY 95-96 Citywide A.C. Street Repair, Project No. PW95-20 to
Hillcrest Construction in the amount of $57,110.00and authorize the Mayor execute
the contract.
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $5,711.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On September 26, 1995 the City Council approved the plans and specifications for FY95-96
A.C. Citywide Street Repair Program, Project No. PW95-20, and authorized the Department
of Public Works to solicit public bids for construction.
The bids were publicily opened on October 19, 1995. This project includes removal and
replacement of A.C. curb and gutter, overlay and removal and replacement of A.C. citywide.
The engineer's estimate for this project was $125,000.
Five (5) bids were received for the pr. oject and the results are as follows:
Base Bid
1. Hillcrest Construction ....................... $57,110.00
2. Ruiz Construction .......................... $71,613.78
3. Laird Construction .......................... $73,773.73
4. IPS Services .............................. $82,701.25
5. Nelson Paving ............................ $100,196.54
-1 - r:\agdrpt\95\1114\pw95-20.awd/ajp
The construction schedule is 45 working days. Work is expected to begin in November, 1995
and be completed by the end of December, 1995.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded from the Public Works Street Maintenance Account No. 100-164-
601-5402. The total project amount is $62,821.00which includes the contract amount of
$57,110.00 plus 10% contingency of $5,711.00.
Attachments:
1. Contract
-2- r:\agd rpt~95\ 1114\p w95- 20 .a wd lajp
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW95-20
FY 95-96 CITYWIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of November, 1995, by and between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Hillcrest
Construction, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:
1.a.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW95-20
FY 95-96 CITYWIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all
modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of
Transportation Standard Specifications ('1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the
Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard SPecifications
for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by
the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American
Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as
amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications
for PROJECT NO. PW95-20 FY 95-96 CITYWIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS. Copies of these
Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-20 FY 95-96 CITYWIDE A.C.
STREET REPAIRS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the
other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting
portions..
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete
detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and
that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR
shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved
in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip\projects\pw95-20/ajp
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding
as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall
be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility
and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW95-20
FY 95-96 CITYWIDE A,C. STREET REPAIRS
All of said 'work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with
the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove
enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work
performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY
or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept
in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: FIFTY-SEVEN THOUSAND ONE
HUNDRED TEN DOLLARS and NO CENTS l$57,110.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Forty FIve (45) working
days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence
until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City
Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions
to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council.
6. PAYMENTS.
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
Ae
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City
Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in
such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer
may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis
for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
CONTRACT CA-2 r:\cip\p rojects\p w95-20/ajp
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after
submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal
to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule.
Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each
successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any
part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final
payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final
Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied
by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is
demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the
amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments
on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid withi'n 30 days pursuant
to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is
hereby incorporated by reference.
7. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the
CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and
correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000-$75,000
$75,000-$500,000
Over $500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section
53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed
pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due
to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to
or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will
not be assessed liquidated damages f~or unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without
the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR
is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above,
CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to
the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance
by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related
to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity
agreement with each claim for payment.
CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip\projects\pw95-20/ajp
10.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor
Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY,
as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer,
worker, or mechanic employed,' paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done
under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of
the Contract.
11.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
13.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, .agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
14.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
· project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
16.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects\pw95-20/ajp
17.
18.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject' to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
21.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first
above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip\projects\pw95-20/ajp
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip~lorojects\pw95-20/ajp
ITEM 21
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14,1995
Award of Contract for FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs Project No.
PW95-21
PREPARED BY: ~l~Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for FY 95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW95-21 to West
Coast Construction in the amount of $38,951.00and authorize the Mayor execute the
contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $3,895.10 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On September 26, 1995 the City Council approved the plans and specifications for 95-96
P.C.C. Citywide Repair Program, Project No. PW95-21, and authorized the Department of
Public Works to solicit public bids for construction.
The bids were publicily opened on October 19, 1995. This project includes removal and
replacement of curb and gutter, sidewalk, cross gutters and storm drain facilities citywide.
The engineer's estimate for this project was $125,000.
Five (5) bids were received for the project and the results are as follows:
Base Bid
1. West Coast Construction ...................... 38,951.00
2. Chino Construction Inc ........................ 47,769.60
3. Excel Commercial ........................... 49,184.00
4. Camino Irvine .............................. 54,421.00
5. Hillcrest Construction ........................ 64,457.00
-1- r:\agdrpt~95\1114\pw95-21 .ewd/ajp
The construction schedule is 45 working days. Work is expected to begin in November, 1995
and be completed by the end of December, 1995.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded from the Public Works Street Maintenance Account No. 100-164-
601-5402. The total project amount is $42,846.10 which includes the contract amount of
$38,951.00 plus 10% contingency of $3,895.10.
Attachments:
1. Contract
-2- r:\agdrpt\95\1114\pw95-21 .awd/ajp
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW95-21
FY 95-96 CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of November, 1995, by and between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and West Coast
Construction,' hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
1.a.
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO, PW95-21
FY 95-96 CITYWIDE P.C,C, REPAIR PROGRAM, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all
modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of
Transportation Standard Specifications (.1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the
Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard SPecifications
for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by
the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American
Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as
amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications
for PROJECT NO. PW95-21 FY 95-96 CITYWIDE P.C.C, REPAIR PROGRAM. Copies of
these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-21 FY 95-96 CITYWIDE P.C.C.
REPAIR PROGRAM.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the
other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting
portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete
detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and
that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR
shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved
in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip\projects\pw95-21/ajp
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding
as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall
be resolved in favor of this Contract.
2. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility
and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW95-21
FY 95-96 CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM
All of said work tO be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with
the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove
enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work
performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY
or its authorized representatives.
4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept
in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: THIRTY-EIGHT THOUSAND
NINE HUNDRED FIFTY-ONE DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($38,951.00),the total amount of the base
bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed forty-five (45) working
days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence
until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change o~ders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City
Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions
to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council.
6. PAYMENTS.
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City
Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in
such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer
may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis
for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
CONTRACT CA-2 r:\cip\projects\pw95-21/ajp
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after
submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal
to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule.
Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each
successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any
part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final
payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a onesyear Warranty and an Affidavit of Final
Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied
by a certificate signed b'y the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is
demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the
amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments
on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant
to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is
hereby incorporated by reference.
7. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the
CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and
correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
~25,000-$75,000
$75,000-$500,000
Over~500,O00
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of ~500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section
53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed
pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due
to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to
or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will
not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the controJ of and without
the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY.' CONTRACTOR
is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above,
CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to
the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance
by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related
to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity
agreement with each claim for payment.
CONTRACT CA-3 r:~cip\projects\pw95-21/ajp
10.
11,
1.2,
13,
14,
15,
16,
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor
Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY,
as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer,
worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done
under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of
the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE, Time is of the essence in this contract,
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) · and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects\pw95-21/ajp
17.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY,
18.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder slYall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
21.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first
above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip\projects~pw95-21/ajp
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip\projects\pw95-21/ajp
ITEM 22
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY ~ ~
FINANCE DIRE ~ ~--
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
(~Josel3h Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Completion and Acceptance of the Rancho Vista\Mira Loma Dr. Sidewalk
Improvements, Project No. PW94-19
PREPARED BY:/~; Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the Rancho Vista\Mira Loma Dr. Sidewalk Improvements, Project
No. PW94-19, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
of Completion if no liens' have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
On July 25, 1995, the City Council awarded a contract for the Rancho Vista\Mira Loma Dr.
Sidewalk Improvements, Project No. PW94-19, to Sean Malek Engineering & Construction Inc.
for $30,590.00. The project. installed a continuous sidewalk around Vail Elementary School
on the Mira Loma and Rancho Vista Drive and on the south side of Rancho Vista Road at the
east end of Temecula Valley High School.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days
after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
pwO41r: ~dq~t~95 ~ 11 ! 4~94- ! 9
FISCAL IMPACT:
The contract amount for this project was $30,590.00. Contract Change Order No. I was
approved by the City Manager in the amount of $2,522.00. The total construction cost was
$33,112.00. This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is being funded 80% from SB-
821 funds.
Attachment:
Notice of Completion
Maintenance Bond
Contractor's Affidavit
!,eO4/r:.~agdrptLqS~l I 14~,-w94- ! 9 .ace
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Perk Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SPACE ASOVE THIS UNE FOR
RECORDER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
::3. A Contract was awarded-by the City of Temecula to Sean Malek Engineering &
Construction, Inc. to perform the following work of improvement:
Rancho Vista/Mira Loma Dr. Sidewalk Improvements.
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was
accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on November
14, 1995. That upon said contract the Washington Intemational Insurance Company was surety for
the bond given by the said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 94-19.
· 6. The street address of said property is: VARIOUS LOCATION THROUGHOUT THE CITY
OF TEMECULA.
Dated at Temecula, California, this __ day of
· 1995.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
ss
I., June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of
,1995.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
i:ormdCl~-00! R~v. 12-5-91 pwO4~pw94-19\com~Dletn.not 102395
E~8 'd
009~ ~ 606
BOHD
S661-61-130
~ S-400 8158
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
PROJECT NO. PW94..19
RANCHO VIST,4/MIRA LOMA DR. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT:
29995 STEEL HF_Jd) DRIVE
SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CANYON LAKE, CA 92587
NAMEAND AOORESSOFCONTRACTOR
a CORPORATION , hereins.fret cs!!ad P~incipsl, and
(fill in whether · Cotl~o~atlo~, Partnership or indtvlduall
1930 THOREAU DRIVE,' SUITE 101
WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY .
heretnafte called SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
hereinaftercalledOWNER, in the penal sum of THIR~'t' THOUSAI;I) FIVE it~!)KED NZHE~_'~
DOLLAR~ mad NO/100--
CENTS |$ $30 , 590 . 00--- ) in lawful money of the United States, for the payment of
which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into · certain
Contract with the OWNER, dated the day of ,19 , a copy of which is
hereto attached and made a pa.rt hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PW94-19 RANCHO
VISTA/MIRA LOMA DR. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS.
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the period of ~ year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER, against
all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and
WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed., and was approved on
19 .
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from
the date of approval of the said Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall
disclose poor workmanship in the execution of Mid work, and the carrying out of the terms of said
Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation
shall remain In full force and virtue, dtherwise this Instrument shall be void.
MAINTENANCE 80NB
M, 1
e:%~/I)~teJeotm~lewl4-t ~E~kO~.
£0 'd
6£:EI S66~-6~-130
Signed and sealed this 20TB day of OCTOB[R
(Seal)
I4ASHINGTON ' l INSURANCE COMPANY
~CHAEL A. Q~GLEY -/
(Name)
A~O~-IN-FA~
~itle)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. ThoraM, City Attorney
,19 95.
SF_4,N MALEK ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION
(Name)
(Title)
By:
(Name)
{Title)
II
I
MAINTINANCie BOND
M-2
r:t~dl,%erohete%pwe4- I SVaklpk0~ eeh
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
On OCTOBER 20,, 1995
PERSONALLY APPEARED
, before me,
. S5.
N, TREDINNICK, NOTARY PUBLIC
14ICHAEL A. QUIGLEY
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowl-
· edged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/
her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/
their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the
entity upon behaff of which the person(s) acted, executed
the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signa re C,'rtj
This area for Official Notanal Seal
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF A'H'ACHED DOCUMENT
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE(S)
[] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
[] GENERAL
]'ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTI'Pf(IES)
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
I.~.,,.~, ,~,.,' .,.4 AI.I.-PURPOSE ACKNOWI.EDGEMENT
WASHINGTON INTERNATiONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL BY THESE pRESENTS: That the Washington International Insurance Comapny, a corporation organized and existing under the
.sot tile Slate of Arizona, and having its principal oilice in the Village of Schaumburg, Illinois does hereby constitute and appoinl
SHA WN BLUME, JENNIFER JOHNSTON, MICHAEL A. QUIGLEY AND DWIGHT REILL Y
EACH IN THEIR SEPARATE CAPACITY
its true and lawful attorrmy(s)-in-fact to execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf as surety, any and all bonds and undertakings.
recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, which are or may be allowed, required. or
permitted by law, statute. rule, regulation, contract or otherwise, and the execution of such instrument(s) in pursuance of these presents.
shall be as binding upon the said Washington International Insurance Company as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if the
samk~ has been duly executed and acknowledged by its President and its principal office.
This Power of Attorney shall be limited in amount to $2,0OO,0OO.00 for any single obligation.
This Power of Attorney is issued pursuant to authority granted by the resolutions of the Board of Directors adopted March 22, 1978, July
3, 1980 and October 21, 1986 which read, in part, as follows:
1. The Chairman of the Board. President. Vice President. Assistant Secretary. Trer~surer and Secretary may designate Attorneys-in-
Fact, and authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the Seal of the Company thereto, bonds,. and
undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and to appoint Special
Attorneys-in-Fact, who are hereby authorized to certify copies of any power-of-attorney issued in pursuant to this section and/or
any of the By-Laws of the Company, and to remove. at any time, any such Attorney-in-Fact or Special Attorney-in-Fact and revoke
the authority given him.
2. The signatures of the Chairman of the Board, the President, Vice President. Assistant Secretary, Treasurer and Secretary. and the
corporate seal of the Company, may be affixed to any Power of Attorney, certificate, bond or undertaking relating thereto, by
facsimile. Any such Power of Attorney, certificate bond or undertaking bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal affixed
in the ordinary course of business shall be valid and binding upon the Company.
J~J TESTIMONY WHEREO~.~.~,~ hington International Insurance Company has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate
to be affixed by~~li;r, this 2.d day of November, 1994.
~ ~% ARIZONA ~ ~illiam D. Sterrett, Chairman of the Board
COUNTY OF COOK)
On this 2nd day of November, 1994, before me came the individual who executed the preceding instrument. to me personally know. and.
being by me duly sworn, said that he is the therein described and authorized officer of the Washington International Insurance Company;
that the seal affixe~ to said instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company;
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, the day and year first above written.
STATE OF ILLINOIS)
COUNTY OF COOK)
I. the undersigned, Secretary ol WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an ARIZONA Corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIF'r
that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked, and furthermore that Article 111.
~ction 5 of the By-Laws of the Corporation. and the Resolution of the Board of Directors, set forth in the Power of Attorney. are now
~rce.
~gned and sealed in the County of Cook. DThe 2_.0._~'t'~l Jay of 0C'r0BEP~ , 19 95 ·
I ewis M Mneller, Secretary
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW94-19
RANCHO VISTA/MIRA LOMA DR. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
This is to certify that ---~/Y~/,F_Jf ~-9~ ;~ ~,~,~ 7'/~ C {hereinafier the
"CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that heat ~as paid in full for all
materials, supplies, labor, sewices, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the
CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcomractors used or in
contribution to the execution of it's contract with the C~y of Temecula, with regard to the building,
erection, construction, or repair of that ce~ain work of improvement known as ~OJE~ NO.
~19 ~CHO ~~1~ LO~ DR. SID~~ IM~O~~ situated in the City of
Temecula, State of California, more pafficularly described as follows:
INSERT ~TLE OF WORK HERE
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts: --
Description Dollar Amount to Dispute
o
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code ~7200,the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Dated: -
CONTRACTOR
By: S re~~
Print Name and Title
RELEASE R-1 r:%cip%projects%pw94-19%bidpkg\
Signed and sealed this ~ day of o 19
(Seal)
SURETY
By:
(Name)
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
PRINCIPAL
By:
(Name)
(Title)
By:
(Name)
(Title)
MAINTENANCE BOND M-2 r:~o~rojects~pw94-19~bidl~k.g~ eeh
ITEM 23
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY , .'?
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
_~,Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Completion end Acceptance of the Access Ramps, Project No. PW95-04
PREPARED BY: ~r Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the Access Ramps, Project No. PW95-04, as complete and direct
the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
of Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
On August 8, 1995, the City Council awarded e contract for the Access Ramps, Project No.
PW95-04, to Seen Malek Engineering and Construction, Inc. for $25,200.00. This project
modified 23 concrete handicap access ramps at various locations throughout the City to
comply with the most recent Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days
after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
p~vO4/r:.~mgdrpt~95~,l 114~Fw95-O4.ae~
FISCAL IMPACT:
The contract amount and total cost for this project is $25,200.00. No changes to the
contract were required during the construction of this project. This project is a Capital
Improvement Project and is being funded by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds.
Attachment:
Notice of Completion
Maintenance Bond
Contractor'$ Affidavit
pwO4/r:%agdrpt\95%l I 14%pw95-.O4.m:c
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Bueinese Padc Drive
TeNmale, CA 92590
SPACE
ABOVE TH~ UNE FOR
RECORDER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded. by the City of Temecula to Sean Malek Engineering &
Construction, Inc. to perform the following work of improvement:
Access Ramps
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was
accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on November
14, 1995. That upon said contract the Washington International Insurance Company was surety for
the bond given by the said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 95-04.
.6. The street address of said property is: VARIOUS LOCATION THROUGHOUT THE CITY
OF TEMECULA.
Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of
· 1995.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
i~edury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly oFdered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of
· 1995.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
FormdCIP-00! R~v. 12-5-9! pwO4%pw95-OS\completn.not 102395
pO 'd
009L ~PE 606
BOND
S66;-6I-1D0
S-400 8161
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
PROJECT NO. PW95.04
ACCESS RAMPS
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT:
SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, 29995 STEEL HEAl) DRIVE,
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR
CANYON LAKE, CA
COlORaTION , harelnafter called Principal, and
(fill ifi whether a Corporation, Pafrnership of tfidivlduall
1930 THOREAU DRIVE, SUITE 101
WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, SCHAHMBURG, IL 60173
NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY
hereinafter called SURETY, are held end firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
hereins fret called OWNER, in the penal sum of
TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED DOLL~ arid NO/100.----
CENTS {$ $25,700.00. ) in lawful money of the United States, for the payment of
which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain
Contract with the OWNER, dated the day of ,19 , a copy of which is
hereto attached and made e.part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PW95-O4ACCES8
RAMPS.
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the period of ~ year after approval of the final estimate on Mid job, by the OWNER, against
eli defects in workmanship and matedais which may become apparent dudng aid period; and
WHEREAS, the add Comra~"t has
19.___.
been completed, and was approved on
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from
the date of approval of the said Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall
disclose poor workmanship In the execution of add work, and the carrying out of the terms of add
Contract, or It shell appear that defective matedde were furnished thereunder, then this obligation
shall remain In full force end virtue; othmwlse this Instrument shell be void,
MAINTENANCE BOND
S0'8 ~£6 89~ ~ 606 0~£I S~I-6I-IDO
81gned and Naiad this 20TB day of
{Seal)
(Name}
ATTORNET-ZN-FACT
(Tidal
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, CIty Attorney
OCTOBER ,19 95
COMI'ANY S~ IdAI,.EK ENCIIqEERINC & CONSTRUCT]
...
{Name}
INams)
(TIde}
iii
MAINTENANCE IOND
M.2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
On OCTOBER 20,. 1995
PERSONALLY APPEARED
, beforeme,
M. TREDINNICK, NOTARY PUBLIC
MICHAEL A. QUIGLEY
personally known to 'me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowl-
edged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/
her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/
theix signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the
entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed
the instrument.
WHNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
~~ N COMM. #1053083
;~ :ARY PU'3LIC - CALIFORNIA
MO:.,oORANGE COUNTY
This area for Official Notarial Seal
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not ~:equired by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
'RTLE(S)
[] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
[] GENERAL
[] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
,~-,,.,1,4,,,. ....., AI.I.-PURPOSE ACKNOWI.EDGEMENT
WASHINGTON INTERNATiONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Washington Inlernational Insurance Comapny, a corporation organized and existing under the
"" ',s of the State ol Arizona, and having its principal office in the Village of Schaumburg, Illinois does hereby conslitule and appoint
SHA WN BLUME. JENNIFER JOHNSTON, MICHAEL A. QUIGLE17 AND DWIGHT REILI. 17
EACH IN THEIR SEPARATE CAPACIT17
its true and lawful attorr~ey(s)-in-fact to execute. seal and deliver for and on its behalf as surety, any and all bonds and undertakings.
recognizances. contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, which are or may be allowed, required, or
permitted by law, statute. rule, regulation, contract or otherwise, and the execution of such instrument(s) in pursuance of these presents.
shall be as binding upon the said Washington International Insurance Company as fully and amply. to all intents and purposes, as il the
same has been duly executed and acknowledged by its President and its principal office.
This Power of Attorney shall be limited in amount to $2,000.000.00 for any single obligation.
This Power of Attorney is issued pursuant to author'fry granted by the resolutions of the Board of Directors adopted March 22, 1978, July
3, 1980 and October 21, 1986 which read, in part, as follows:
1. The Chairman of the Board, President, Vice President. Assistant Secretary, Treasurer and Secretary may designate Attorneys-in-
Fact, and authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the Seal of the Company thereto, bonds.. and
undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and to appoint Special
Attorneys-in-Fact, who are hereby authorized to certify copies of any power-of-attorney issued in pursuant to this section and/or
any of the By-Laws of the Company, and to remove, at any time, any such Attorney-in-Fact or Special Attorney-in-Fact and revoke
the authority given him.
2. The signatures of the Chairman of the Board, the President, Vice President. Assistant Secretary, Treasurer and Secretary, and the
corporate seal of the Company, may be affixed to any Power of Attorney, certificate, bond or undertaking relating thereto, by
facsimile. Any such Power of Attorney, certificate bond or undertaking bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal affixed
in the ordinary course of business shall be valid and binding upon the Company.
L~ TESTIMONY WHEREO~.=.4be~,~ hington International Insurance Company has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate
COUNTY OF COOKI
On this 2nd day of November, 1994, before me came the individual who executed the preceding instrument, to me personally know. and.
being by me duly sworn. said that he is the therein described and authorized olficer ol the Washington International Insurance Company;
that the seal affixe~ to said instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Com~-any;
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, the day and year first above written. ,
STATE OF ILLINOIS)
COUNTY OF COOK)
I. the undersigned, Secretary ol WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an ARIZONA Corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIF~r
that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked, and furthermore that Article III.
--~ection 5 of the By-Laws of the Corporation, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors, set forth in the Power of Attorney. are now
orce.
~igned and sealed in the County of Cook. DThe 2_.0.._I~!] Jay of OC'_rOBER , 19 95 ·
lewis M. Meeller, Secretary
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFRDAVIT AND RNAL RR I::ASE
PROJECT NO, PW95-04
ACCESS RAMPS
This is to certify that ~'~AA/////A/,F--~ E~o~ L/~-~ T/~/t , (hereinafter the
"CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, ~jnde ath, that heat has paid in full for all
materials, supplies,-iabor, services,-tools,'equipment, 'and--all other-bills contracted for by the
CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in
contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building,
erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO.
PW95-04 ACCESS RAMPS situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly
described as follows:
ACCESS RAMPS
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unl~aid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice against .of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereb''
disputes the following amounts:
Description
Dollar Amount to Dispute
c~
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
-Dated:
CONTRACTOR
Signature
Print Name and Title
RELEASE R-1
Signed and sealed this __ day of ,19 .
(Seal)
SURETY
By:
(Name)
(Tide)
APPROVE) AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
PRINGIPAL
By:
(Name)
rnde)
By:
(Name)
(T'ide)
MAINTENANCE BOND M-2
ITEM 24
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
"No Parking" Zones on the East Side of Front Street from SR 79(S) to
Santiago Road
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON THE
EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET FROM SR 79(S) TO SANTIAGO
ROAD ADJACENT TO ALL DRIVEWAYS
BACKGROUND:
The Department of Public Works staff received a request for red curb adjacent to existing
driveways along Front Street, due to the recent increase of on-street parking generated by a
new business. Soon after this contact, the police informed our office of the possible need to
increase sight distances restricted by parked vehicles. These allegations were confirmed
during our field review and substantiated by a traffic collision between the exiting vehicles
colliding with a northbound motorists.
On October 25, 1995, the Traffic Division issued an emergency work order to have red curb
painted adjacent to each driveway, totalling approximately 540 feet. We restricted 40 feet
to the south and 20 feet to the north of each driveway.
At the October 26, 1995, meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, staff reported on
the need to restrict parking adjacent to driveways on the east side of Front Street south of
Santiago Road, to extend the existing sight distances. The concern was that a serious public
safety issue has been created and needed immediate attention. The Public/Traffic Safety
Commission voiced no objections to staff's recommendation for City Council to approve "No
Parking" zones as per the attached resolution.
r:Nagdtpt\95\ 1114~noprkfro .agn/ajp
On October 27, 1995, our Maintenance Division completed the painting as requested. The
Department of Public Works is requesting the support of the City Council to substantiate our
emergency implementation of red curb parking restrictions adjacent to all driveways on the
east side of Front Street south of Santiago Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Sign account No. 100-164-602-5410.
540' - Red Curb at $.58/L.F. = $313.20
Attachments:
Resolution No. 95-
Exhibit "A" - Location Map
r:~agdrpt\95\l 114~noprkfro.agn/ajp
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCH,, OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES
ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET FROM SR 79(S)
TO SANTIAGO ROAD ADJACENT TO ALL DRIVEWAYS
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.16.160, of the Temecula Municipal Code, "No
Parking" zones are hereby established in the City of Temecula on the east side of Front Street
from SR 79(S) to Santiago Road 40 feet south of and 20 feet north of all driveways.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVFJ} AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of November, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 95-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City. of Temecula on the 14th day of November, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
r:Xagdrpt\95\l 114~noprkfro.agn/ajp
NORTH
FRONT
LOCATION MAP
Exhibit "A"
,,-
ITEM 25
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Council/City Manager
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE:
November .14, 1995
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
Award of Construction Contract For Parkview Site Improvement Project,
Phase 1, Fire Station 84- Project No. PW95-09CSD
(~Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
~)on Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Edward Stone, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve the plans and specifications and award a contract for Parkview Site
Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84, Project PW95-09CSD, to Great West
Contractors for the base bid and the two alternates in the amount of $1,970,842.46
and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract and;
Authorize the Mayor to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount
of $197,084.24which is equal to 10% of the contract amount·
BACKGROUND:
On January 24, 1995, the City Council authorized the preparation of construction plans and
specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for
construction. The design of the project includes grading of the existing site, disposal of excess
earth on the Sports Park site, construction of a new, single story Fire Station, site landscaping,
on-site utilities, an 8" sewer main in Pauba Road, widening of the North side of Pauba Road
from Margarita to west of Showalter, road repairs and a 2" asphalt overlay.
Two alternates were also proposed for the project. They consisted of constructing the rear
parking lot with concrete instead of asphalt, and constructing an above ground fuel dispensing
system.
The estimated construction cost for this project was $1,979,000.00.
- 1 - r:%agdrpt\ 1114/pw95-Ogcsd .awd/ajp
Bids for the project were publicly opened on October 19, 1995 and the results shown below
include the base bid and the two alternates.
1. Great West Contractors ................. $1,970,842.46
2. Gibralter Construction .................. $2,069,428.81
3. Young Contractors ..................... $2,095,388.10
4. D.M. Erickson Construction ............... $2,111,043.93
5. The Gorham Company ................... $2,138,914.00
6. T.B. Penick & Sons ..................... $2,164,792.00
7. M.R. Bracey Construction ................ $2,177,064.44-
8. Gib-Son Construction .................... $2,185,171.00
9. Fischbeck Construction .................. $2,264,819.85
10. J. Murrey Construction .................. $2,343,115.63
11. Del Mar Pacific ............. ' .......... $2,525,142.70
12o Martin J. Jaska ...................... Incomplete
Staff has contacted the State Contractors License Board and confirmed that the license is
current and in good standing. We have also contacted references supplied by Great West
Contractors regarding the quality, timeliness and accuracy of previous work. We have received
favorable comments from private companies and other Government agencies for work of a
similar scope, including construction of a Fire Station in Orange County.
The construction schedule is for one-hundred ninety two (192) working days. Work is
expected to begin in early December, 1995 and be completed by the beginning of September,
1996.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Fire Station facility and site improvements will be funded by Fire Mitigation funds
budgeted in the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 1994-1995, Account No. 210-
190-626-5804,and the improvements to Pauba Road will be funded with Development Impact
Fees, account No. 210-165-660-5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
Great West Contractors Construction Contract
-2-
r:Nagdrpt\ 1114/pw95-O9~sd.awdlajp
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW95-O9CSD
PARKVIEW SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - PHASE I
FIRE STATION 84
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of November, 1995, by and between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and GREAT WEST
CONTRACTORS, INC., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:
1 .a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to
wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials
Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW95-OgCSDPARKVIEW SITE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT, PHASE I, FIRE STATION 84, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and
amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications
(1992 Ed.) where specifically'referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest
version of the Standard SPecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as
written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of -
the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications")
as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for
PROJECT NO~ PW95-09CSD PARKVIEW SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PHASE I, FIRE STATION
84. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO, PW95-09CSD PARKVIEW SITE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PHASE I, FIRE STATION 84.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other
Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions .of the work in general terms, but not in complete
detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that
only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall
furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in
executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding
as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be
resolved in favor of this Contract.
2. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and
transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW95-09CSD PARKVIEW SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - PHASE I
FIRE STATION 84
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the
Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated
and adopted by CITY.
3. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work
performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or
its authorized representatives.
4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept
in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done,"the sum of: ONE MILLION, NINE HUNDRED
SEVENTY THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED FORTY TWO DOLLARS and FORTY SIX CENTS
($1,970,842.46),the total amount of the base bid, Alternate Bid No. 1 and Additive Bid No. 2.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period' not to exceed ONE HUNDRED NINETY
TWO(192) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall
not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City
Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to
the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council.
6. PAYMENTS.
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
A. Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTORshall submit to the City Engineer
a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and
supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule,
as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
B. Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after
submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety
percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request
forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work
progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made
sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty
and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
C. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a
certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has
been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the
certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not
be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
D. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to
Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
7. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the
CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and
correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000-$75,000
$75,000-$500,000
Over$500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
8. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section
53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant
to Paragraph '4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become
due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to
CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed
liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence
of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify
CITY of any such delay.
9. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above,
CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the
payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by
CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the
payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement
with each claim for payment.
10. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State
of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the
general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of
workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations.
These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office
of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of
Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a
penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or
mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this
Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
11. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in
preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees,
and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees
included) and damage to property, arising directly. or indirectly out of the obligations herein
undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or
litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
13. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or
representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with
respect thereto.
14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship,
and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer,
or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further
warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date
of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After-the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract,
CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons
employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full,
and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except
certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection
with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
16. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any
actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with
respect thereto, to CITY.
17. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may
be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection
and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
18. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized
representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without
limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all
reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and
tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject
to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such
final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color,
sex, age, or handicap.
20. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the
law of the State of California.
21. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S, Mail, postage prepaid, directed to
the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed
as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first
above written.
DATED: CONTRACTOR
By:
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM 26
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Accept Grant of Easements for Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10
PREPARED BY:/~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC
ROAD AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES ON WALCOTT LANE AND LA
SERENA WAY
BACKGROUND:
The Walcott Corridor project will provide for two (2) travel lanes (total of 28' of pavement
width) within a 66' wide right-of-way on Walcott Lane and 88' wide right-of-way on La Serena
Way. The alignment will follow the existing right-of-way, except Walcott Lane which will be
realigned to form a 90 degree intersection with the proposed extension of La Serena Way.
Also, grading for the new road will change the elevation of the existing road and necessitate
slope and drainage easements.
The attached legal descriptions and plats are adjacent to the intersection of Walcott Lane and
La Serena Way and are incorporated into 2 separate documents, one has a total of nine (9)
parcels which contain four (4) right-of-way & five (5) slope and drainage easements. The
second has two (2) parcels which contain one right-of-way and one slope and drainage
easement. Both documents are required since no right-of-way exist for the new alignment of
Walcott Lane and La Serena Way. The owner of these parcels has reviewed the project plans
and legal descriptions and has agreed to dedicate the necessary easements for this project.
The proposed road improvements for the Walcott Corridor will not be accepted into the City-
Maintained street system until all the street improvements have been completed and accepted
by the City Council.
r: Nagdrpt\95\ 1114\wslcou.cas
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact is anticipated from accepting the right-of-way dedications for the Walcott
Corridor.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution
r:~agdrpt\95\1114\walcolt.eas
RESOLUTION NO. 9~-
A RESOLIfrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION
FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES ON
WALCOTT LANE AND LA SERENA WAY
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
WHEREAS, portions ofproperty at the extension of La Serena Way and the realignment
of Walcott Lane as shown in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto, have been offered for dedication to
the City:
WHEREAS, the legal descriptions for the dedications are set forth in Exhibit "B",
attached hereto:
WHEREAS, the dedications are easements for road and drainage purposes and are
necessary to construct the street improvements on Walcott Lane and La Serena Way.
NOW, TIIEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Section 1. That the City of Temecula accepts the offers of dedication on Walcott Lane
and La Serena Way.
Section 2. The City Clerk' shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 14th of November, 1995.
ATI'EST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
r:Xagdrpt\95Xl 114\walcolz.eas
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. '-Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of November, 1995, by the
following vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILlv~=~MBERS:
ABSTAIN: -
COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:Xagdrpfi95\l 114\wslcoU.~s
EXHIBIT "A"
Key Map
EXHIBIT KEY MAP
7'R,4C7- NO. 23a20
TT NO, 23209
RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE EXCEPTED
FOR pUBLIC ROAD AND DRAINAGE pURPOSES
TRACT NO. 221~1,S
EXHIBIT "B"
Legal Descriptions
(To be attached to final resolution)
RECORDED AT REQUEST OF
AND WHEN RECORDED
RETURN TO:
June Greek
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California, 92590
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES
pursuant to Government Code
Sections 6103 and 27383
GRANT OF EASEMENT
For a~a e co id,~..eration, the receipt of which is hereby-acknowledged,
OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation (the "City"), an easement for public right of way
and utility purposes (the "Easement") legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference, subject to the conditions, covenants, restrictions and
reservations contained herein.
1. This Grant of Easement is made with respect to the following facts
which Grantor acknowledges as true and correct:
a. Grantor is the owner of certain real property situated in the
County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as set for
the on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference
(the "Property").
2. The Easement shall be a right of way and the public shall have rights
of access and use consistent-with the Easement's use as a public street.
3. The City shall construct all of the necessary street improvements upon
the Easement in accordance with the City standards and P.W. 94-10 Street Improvement
Plans.
to be executed, this /,.~ - ,1995.
GRANTOR
a~vo~nia Ange~ca, T~ .
ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWrI-~'DG~
Sum of 01~orn/a )
/
~pp~ ~von~a An~e] ~ca, l~stee /
[]
, personally
personally knov~n to me -OR-
proved to me on ~he basis of mtisfacmry evidence m be ~he person(s) whose name(s)
is/arc subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he,/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/the~
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Wimess my hand and official seal.
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
BY SIGNER
[]
[1
mDBrmUAL(S)
OFFiCER(S) Crrrr-~[s]):
[l
[1
[1
[1
[1
PARTNER(S)
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
SUBSCRIBING WITNESS
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
CHAIRPERSON/MAYOR
OTWh'Rz _
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
LAXl:l148gO.1
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
(Government Code Section 27281)
TFiIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in r~ property conveyed by the
attached Grant of Easement, dated ,1995 from , a
Grantor, to the City of Temecula, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council of the
City of Tcmecula on 1995, and the Grantee consents to recordafion thereof by
its duly authorized officer.
Dated: ,1995.
CITY OF ~CU'LA
BY:
JEFFREY STONE
Mayor
LAX2:12~g0.1
ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250
Temecula, California 92590
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Revised February 27, 1995
December 14, 1994
JN 400617-M1
Page 1 of 7
WALCOTT LANE AND LA SERENA WAY
SLOPE, DP~AINAGE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS
PARCELS 5 AND 7 OF PMB 1/44-46
Those certain parcels of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Parcels 5 and 7 of a
parcel map filed in Book 1, Pages 44 through 46 of Parcel Maps in the Office of
the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows:
Parcel I (La Serena Way)
A strip of land 88.00 feet wide, the centerline of which is described as follows:
COMMENCING at the southwesterly corner of said Parcel 5;
thence along the southerly line of said parcel South 89°31'08'' East 101.97 feet
to the non-tangent intersection with a curve in the centerline of La Serena Way
as shown on a map of Tract No. 22148 filed in Book 202, Pages 92 through 104 of
Maps in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder, said curve being concave
southeasterly and having a radius of 1600.00 feet, a radial line of said curve
from said intersection bears South 42'20'43" East, said point being the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
thence along the northeasterly continuation of said curve as shown on said tract
map northeasterly 351.88 feet through a central angle of 12°36'03" to a point
hereinafter referred to as Point "A";
thence continuing along said curve northeasterly 93.65 feet through a central
angle of 3'21'13" to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "B" and the POINT
OF TEP. MINATION.
Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened southwesterly so as to
terminate in said southerly l the of Parcel 5 or in the westerly line of said
Parcel 7.
CONTAINING:
0.901 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 2 (Walcott Lane)
A strip of land 66.00 feet wide, the centerline of which is described as follows:
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
Walcott Lane and La Serena Way
Slope, Drainage and Right-of-Way Easements
Parcels 5 and 7 of PMB 1/44-46
Revised February 27, 1995
December 14, 1994
JN 400617-M1
Page 2 of 7
CO!tMENCING at Point "A" as hereinbefore described in Parcel 1, said point being
on a curve in the centerline of La Serena Way concave southeasterly and having
a radius of 1600.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
South 29'44'40'' East;
thence radially from said curve North 29'44~40'' West 44..00 feet to the
northwesterly line of said Parcel 1 (La Serena Way) and the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
thence continuing North 29°44'40" West 309.83 feet to the beginning of a tangent
curve concave easterly and having a radius of 600.00 feet;
thence along said curve northerly 281.97 feet through a central angle of
26'55~33'' to the northerly line of said Parcel 5 of said parcel map;
Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened so as to terminate southerly
in said northwesterly line of Parcel 1 {La Serena Way) and northerly in said
northerly line or in the westerly line of said Parcel 5.
CONTAINING:
0.877 Acres Gross, more or less.
PARCEL 3 (Walcott Lane)
BEGINNING at the intersection of the northwesterly line of La Serena Way as
hereinbefore described in Parcel 1 with the northeasterly line of Walcott Lane
as hereinbefore described in Parcel 2;
thence along said northeasterly line North 29'44'40" West 22.35 feet;
thence South 75'01'3&" East 32.67 feet to the non-tangent intersection with a
curve in said northwesterly line concave southeasterly and having a radius of
1644.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
South 27'47'06" East;
thence along said curve and northwesterly line southwesterly 23.22 feet through
a central angle of 0'48'33" to. the POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING:
0.006 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 4 (Walcott Lane)
BEGINNING at the intersection of the northwesterly line of La Serena Way as
heroinbefore described in Parcel I with the southwesterly line of Walcott Lane
as hereinbefore described in Parcel 2;
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
Walcott Lane and La Serena Way
Slope, Drainage and Right-of-Way Easements
Parcels 5 and 7 of PMB 1/44-46
Revised February 27, 1995
December 14, lgg4
JN 400617-M1
Page 3 of 7
thence along said southwesterly line North 2g'44'40" West 22.35 feet;
thence South 15'32~14'' West 32.67 feet to the non-tangent intersection with a
curve in said northwesterly line concave southeasterly and having a radius of
1644.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
South 31°42'14" East;
thence along said curve and northwesterly line northeasterly 23.22 feet through
a central angle of 0°48'33" to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING:
0.006 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 5 (Slope and Drainage Easement)
BEGINNING at the northwesterly corner of the hereinbefore described Parcel 3,
being a point on the northeasterly line of the hereinbefore described Parcel 2
{Walcott Lane);
thence along the northerly line of said Parcel 3 South 75'01'33" East 32.67 feet
to the non-tangent intersection with a curve in the northwesterly line of La
Serena Way as hereinbefore described in Parcel i concave southeasterly and having
a radius of 1644.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
South 27°47'06" East;
thence along said curve and northwesterly line northeasterly 22.00 feet through
a central angle of 0°46'00";
thence non-tangent from said curve North 54°45'08'' West 106.91 feet to said
northeasterly line of Parcel 2;
thence along said northeasterly line South 2g'44~40" East 73.00 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
COIfIAINING:
0.043 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 6 (Slope and Drainaqe Easement)
BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of the hereinbefore described Parcel 4,
being a point on the southwesterly line of the hereinbefore described Parcel 2
(Walcott Lane);
thence along said southwesterly line North 2g°44'40'' West 50.31 feet;
thence South 16'44'36" East 53.37 feet;
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
Walcott Lane and La Serena Way
Slope, Drainage and Right-of-Way Easements
Parcels 5 and 7 of PMB 1/44-46
Revised February 27, 1995
December 14, 1994
JN 400617-M1
Page 4 of 7
thence South 56'20'36" West 190.99 feet;
thence North 38'07'12" West 5.00 feet;
thence South 51'52'48" West 15.00 feet;
thence South 38'07'12" East 5.00 feet;
thence South 56'59'10" West 62.82 feet;
thence South 51'05'58" West 51.05 feet;
thence North 89'31'08" West 20.00 feet;
thence South 0'28'52" West 22.67 feet;
thence South 41'54'12" West 47.58 feet to the southwesterly corner of said
Parcel 5 of said parcel map;
thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 5 South 89'31'08" East 38.45 feet
to the non-tangent intersection with a curve in the northwesterly line of the
hereinbefore described Parcel I {La Serena Way), said curve being concave
southeasterly and having a radius of 1644.00 feet, a radial line of said curve
from said point bears South 43'58'30" East;
thence along said curve and northwesterly line northeasterly 352.10 feet through
a central angle of 12'16'16" to the most westerly corner of said Parcel 4;
thence along the northwesterly line of said Parcel 4, non-tangent from said curve
North 15'32'14" East 32.67 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
COl(rAINING: 0.232 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 7 (Slope and Drainaqe Easement)
COI~RENCING at Point "B" as hereinbefore described in Parcel 1 {La Serena Way),
being a point on a curve in the centerline of La Serena Way concave southeasterly
and having a radius of 1600.03 feet;
thence radially from said curve South 26'23'27" East 44.00 feet to a point in a
curve in the southeasterly line of said Parcel 1 concave southeasterly and having
a radius of 1556.00 feet;
thence along said curve and southeasterly line southwesterly 13.98 feet through
a central angle of 0'30'53" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
Walcott Lane and La Serena Way
Slope, Drainage and Right-of-Way Easements
Parcels 5 and 7 of PMB 1/44-46
Revised February 27, 1995
December 14, lg94
JN 400617-M1
Page 5 of 7
thence non-tangent from said curve South 20'54'27" West 35.46 feet;
thence North 69'05'33" West 18.00 feet to the non-tangent intersection with a
curve having a radius of 1546.00 feet and being concentric with and 10.00 feet
southeasterly from last said curve, a radial line of said curve from said point
bears South 28'19'39" East;
thence along said concentric curve southwesterly 227.08 feet through a central
angle of 8'24'57";
thence non-tangent from said curve South 0'28'52" West lg.40 feet;
thence North 89'31'08" West 25.00 feet to the non-tangent intersection with last
said curve, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
South 37'54'58" East;
thence along said curve southwesterly 60.00 feet through a central angle of
2'13'25" to the southerly line of said Parcel 5 of said parcel map;
thence along said southerly line North 89'31'08" West 15.29 feet to the non-
tangent intersection with said curve in the southeasterly line of Parcel 1, a
radial line of said curve from said point bears South 40'34'02" East;
thence along said curve and southeasterly line northeasterly 371.01 feet through
a central angle of 13'39'42" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING:
0.092 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 8 (Slope and Drainaqe Easement)
COlt~ENCING at the most northerly corner of the hereinbefore described Parcel 5,
said point being in the northeasterly line of the hereinbefore described
Parcel 2 {Walcott Lane);
thence along said northeasterly line North 29'44'40" West 30.31 feet to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence North 17'56'06" West 65.66 feet;
thence North 7'37'40" West 130.22 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave
southwesterly and having a radius of 100.00 feet, a radial line of said curve
from said point bears South 81'46'43" West;
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
Walcott Lane and La Serena Way
Slope, Drainage and Right-of-Way Easements
Parcels 5 and 7 of PMB 1/44-46
Revised February 27, 1995
December 14, 1994
JN 400617-M1
Page 6 of 7
thence along said curve northwesterly 54.64 feet through a central angle of
31'18'17" to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave northeasterly and
having a radius of 227.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point
bears North 50'28'26" East;
thence'along said curve northwesterly 160.57 feet through a central angle of
40'31'44" to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave westerly and
having a radius of 200.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
North 88'59'50" West;
thence along said curve northerly 22.01 feet through a central angle of 6°18~17''
to the northerly line of said Parcel 5 of said parcel map;
thence along said northerly line, non-tangent from said curve
North 89'32'44" West 53.42 feet to the non-tangent intersection with a curve in
said northeasterly line of Parcel 2, said curve being concave northeasterly and
having a radius of 567.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
North 86'59'26" East;
thence along said curve and northeasterl~ line southeasterly 264.57 feet through
a central angle of 26'44'06" to the termination of said curve;
thence continuing along said northeasterly line, tangent from said curve
South 29'44'40" East 184.50 feet to the TRUE PoI!fr OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 0.438 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 9 (Slope and Drainaqe Easement)
COliqENCING at the most northerly corner of the hereinbefore described Parcel 6,
said point being in the southwesterly line of the hereinbefore described
Parcel 2 {Walcott Lane);
thence along said southwesterly line North 29'44'40" West 59.74 feet to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence North 39'36'38" West 215-~88 feet;
thence North 75'43'48" West 18.50 feet;
thence North 21'21'28" West 31.92 feet;
thence North 2'18'14" West 101.03 feet to the westerly line of said Parcel 5 of
said parcel map;
RoSert Bein, William Frost & Associates
Walcott Lane and La Serena Way
Slope, Drainage and Right-of-Way Easements
Parcels 5 and 7 of PMB 1/44-46
Revised February 27, 1995
December 14, 1994
JN 400617-M1
Page 7 of 7
thence along said westerly line North 8'43'54" East 59.24 feet to the non-tangent
intersection with a curve in said southwesterly line of Parcel 2, said curve
being concave northeasterly and having a radius of 633.00 feet,a radial line of
said curve from said point bears North 80'08'58" East;
thence along said curve and southwesterly line southeasterly 219.79 feet through
a central angle of 19'53'38" to the termination of said curve;
thence continuing along said southwesterly line, tangent from said curve
South 29'44'40" East 177.76 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 0,225 Acres Gross, more or less.
SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record.
EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
0 C~ ;
O,J O,J
/ 'QQ
/ \-,, N~.5~_.18.~
P"~' '~' I - - -~ t~I 7~ ' ;.
PCz. /
EXHIBIT 'B' SKETCH
TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
WALCOTT LANE
SLOPE, DRAINAGE it RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENTS
PARCEL 4 OF P.M.B. I / 44-46
DATE ~ SCALE
IZ- 14 - 9~ I" = IOO'
q
SHEET I OF I SHEET
~obcn c]gcirL,c117illiam cFfost G~c~ssociates
R
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. PLANNERS & SU VEYORS
28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE · SUITE 250 · TEMECULA, CA 676,8042 · FAX 676,7240
FIELD BOOK
JOB NO
400~17- An 13
_J
EXHIBIT ' B' SKETCH
1'O ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
WALCOTT LANE It LA SERNA WAY
SLOPE, DRAINAGE It RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENTS
PARCELS 5 8 7 OF P.M.B. 1/44-46
I~- :4 - ~ I' -' ID&'
i /
pCL,.
5
7
pCL. 7
NOTE: ,SEE 3HEET E FOR
TABLE OF CBURS~,~
SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS
~Yoen cBeBL, q~zjlliam c'Frost ¢~c,~ssociates
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. PLANNERS & SURVEYORS
28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE · SUITE 250 · TEMECULA CA
676.8042 · FAX676-7240
FIELD BCX:)f( ~ JOB NO
4z2D~,/7-~4/
TABLE OF COURSES
D-15'57'16"
~12'36'03'
SI6'44'36"E
~S56'20'36"~
N38'0~'12'~
S51 '52' 48'~
S38'0~'12"E
S56'59'10'~
-12'16'16"
26'23'2~'E
NIT'56'06"
N0~'3~'40'~
-06'18'
~N89'32'44"
~N21'21'28'~
~N08'43' ~"E
~-19'53' 38"
S29'44'40"E
~N29~' 40"W
R-1600,00' L-445.53'
R-1600,00' L-351,88'
R-1600,00' L- 93,65'
101,97'
44,00' (RAD)
309,83'
R- 600,00' L-281,9T'
12,28'
22,35'
32,67'
R-1644,00' L- 23,22'
32,67'
R-1644,00' L- 22,00'
106,91'
73.00'
50.31'
53.37'
190.99'
5.00'
15.00'
5.00'
62.82'
51.05'
47.58'
38.45'
R"1644.00' L-352.10'
44.00'
R-1556.00' L- 13.98'
35,46'
18.00'
R-1546.00' L-22T.OB'
15.29'
R-1556.00' L-371.01'
30.31'
65.66'
130.22'
R- 100-00' L- 54.64'
R- 227.00' L-160.5T'
R- 200.00' L- 22.01'
53-42'
R- 567.00' L-264-57'
184-50'
215.88'
18.50'
31,92'
101,03'
59,24'
R" 633-00' L-219-79'
177.76'
59.74'
D TAI .A~
EXHIBIT ' B' __SKETCH NOT
TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
WALCOTT LANE It LA SERENA WAY
SLOPE, DRAINAGE B RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENTS
PARCELS 5 8, 7 OF P.M.B. 1/44-46
/Z- /~I-
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
~.obcrt cgei~L, c11/'illiam c~'rost ¢~.c~ssociates
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS
28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE · SUITE 250 · TEMECULA. CA
676-8042 · FAX 6}'6-7240
SCALE I FIELD BOOK I JOB NO
~t~DB/7-
ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250
Temecula, California 92590
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
WALCOTT LANE
SLOPE, DP~AINAGE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS
PARCEL 4 OF PMB 1/44-46
december 14, 1994
JN 400617-M13
Page 1 of 2
Those certain parcels of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Parcel 4 of a parcel map
filed in Book 1, Pages 44 through 46 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County
Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows:
PARCEL 1 (Walcott Lane)
BEGINNING at the intersection of the southerly line of said Parcel 4 with a line
parallel with and 33.00 feet easterly from the westerly line of said parcel;
thence along said parallel line North 8'43'46'' East 117.10 feet to the point of
cusp with a tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of 567.00 feet;
thence along said curve southerly 116.19 feet through a central angle of
11'44~28'' to said southerly line of Parcel 4;-
thence along said southerly line~ non-tangent from
North 89°32'52" West 11.99 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
said .curve
CONTAINING:
0.011 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 2 (Slope and Drainage Easement)
COMMENCING at the intersection of the southerly line of said Parcel 4 with a line
parallel with and 33.00 feet easterly from the westerly line of said parcel;
thence along said parallel line-North 8°43'46" East 117.10 feet to the point of
cusp with a tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of 567.00 feet,
said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence continuing along said parallel line North 8°43'46" East 746.45 feet;
thence South 4'50~16'' East 39.98 feet;
thence South 27'49'36" East 80.69 feet;
thence South 20'40'59" East 73.86 feet;
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates
Walcott Lane
Slope, Drainage and Right-of-Way Easements
Parcel 4 of PMB 1/44-46
December 14, 1994
JN 400617-M13
Page 2 of 2
thence South 8'42'04" West 27.00 feet;
thence SOuth 41°54'09" West 162.51 feet;
thence South 8'43~46" West 28.02 feet;
thence South 7'09~42'' East 250.00 feet;
thence South 82°50~18'' West 10.00 feet;
thence North 7°09~42'' West 185.47 feet;
thence South 19'59~43'' West 21.81 feet~
thence South 8°43~46'' West 247.42 feet;
thence North 48°53'18'' East 110.00 feet;.
thence South 41°06~42'' East 10.00 feet;
thence South 48°53~18'' West 121.85 feet;
thence South 8°43~46'' West 49.60 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave
westerly and having a radius of 200.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from
said point bears-South 52°19~18'' West;
thence along said curve southerly 113.01 feet through a central angle of
32°22'27'' to the southerly line of said Parcel 4;
thence along said southerly line North 89°32~52'' West 53.42 feet to the non-
tangent intersection with first mentioned curve having a radius of 567.00 feet,
a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 86°59~18'' East;
thence along said curve northerly 116.19 feet through a central angle of
11°44~28'' to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 0.628 Acres, more or less.
SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record.
EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
I '
~ c.,/~' ~ ,/~ ~~~
~ ~/' L.S. S52 ~ ~ Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527
ITEM 27
FINANCE DIREC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
November 6, 1995
Award of Bid for Replacement Network Server for City Hall
PREPARED BY: Thomas Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award a bid for the purchase of the
replacement network server for city hall, Bid Number 95-33 to Inacom Information Systems,
San Diego, CA for $37,711.42.
BACKGROUND: On September 21, 1995 the city solicited public bids for the purchase
of a Compaq ProLiant 4500R 5/1 O0 Model I File Server to replace the existing file server at
city hall which has reached its capacity. This will allow the city to migrate the current file
server to support the Document Imaging System proposed for Records Management, to be
purchased at a later date.
Nine (9) bids for the server were publicly opened on October 19, 1995 and the results are as
follows:
Bidder Bid Amount
1. Western Data Technology, Riverside $33,052.31
2. inacom Information Systems, San Diego $37,711.42
3. Software House International, Huntington Beach $38,170.44
4. Jaguar/MicroAge Computers, Riverside $39,830.49
5. PC Systems Design, Brea $39,970.00
6. Vortex Data Systems, San Diego $40,433.25
7. MicroAge of Temecula, TemeCula $40,535.90
8. CompUSA, San Marcos $41,373.33
9. LPS Computer Service, Escondido No Bid
Western Data Technology of Riverside, bid of $33,052.31 was incomplete and did not include
three of the four 4.3-GB Hard Drives as specified in the bid.
Staff reviewed the bid proposal from Inacom Information Systems of San Diego, and found
that the proposal was complete and in order. Inacom has done business with the City in the
past, and has always provided good reliable service.
Staff recommends that the bid for the purchase of the replacement network server for city
hall, be awarded.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the Information Systems office.
FISCAL IMPACT: The 1995-96 operating budget included $38,000 for the acquisition of
a Compaq server.
ITEM 28
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
FINANCE DIREC~
CITY MANAGER ~~.
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
November 14, 1995
Award of Contract for the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10
PREPARED BY:/~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for the construction of the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 to
Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction for $1,716,637.50and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of 9171,663.75which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the
Walcott Corridor Project.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and authorized the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Walcott Corridor Project,
PW94-10. This project will provide an all weather surface road (two travel lanes) from Nicolas
Road to La Serena Way by way of Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos, and Walcott Road. The
existing grades of all the streets throughout the project will be raised and lowered to construct
a smooth road alignment. The proposed new grades will require Rancho California Water
District to relocate their existing water main in Walcott Lane and Calle Chapos. The cost for
the relocation will be reimbursed to the City by R.C.W.D. The bid also includes an alternative
bid to refurbish the existing 30" water main instead of installing an entirely new main line.
The engineer's estimate for the street improvements and water main relocation is $1,583,000
and $837,000, respectively. This brings the total estimated project cost to $2,420,000.
Staff has complete the Initial Environmental Study (IES) and pursuant to the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as
proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As
a result, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Negative Declaration and
approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for this project. Eleven (11 ) bids for the project were
publicly opened on August 24, 1995 and the results for the base bid are as follows:
pwO4~agdrpt\95\l 114~pw94-10.awd
Base Bid
1. Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc.
dba Genesis Construction ................. $1,716,637.50
2. Utah Pacific Construction, Company ......... $1,905,175.00
3. TNT Grading Inc .................... ; . . $1,905,523.43
4. -Paul Hubbs Construction Co., Inc ............ $1,927,655.70
5. C.A. Rasmussen, Inc .................... $1,955,190.70
6. Greg J. Harris Construction .............. . $1,963,896.80
7. American Contracting, Inc ................ $1,972,284.15
8. Highgrade Engineering, Inc ................ $1,985,715.25
9. Commercial Contractors, Inc. dba
Commercial Contractors Western Division., Inc.. $2,124,435.81
10. Vance Corporation ..................... $2,268,778.29
11. J. R. Pipeline Co., Inc .................... $2,389,004.25
The bid results were reviewed with Rancho California Water District and it is recommended
that the least costly option of installing new pipe be awarded. The total cost of the water
facilities is $647,453.00 and is included in the base bid shown above for Genesis
Construction.
Staff reviewed the bid proposal from Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis
Construction and found that the proposal was complete and in order. Hemet Manufacturing
Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction has not performed any work for the City, but has
performed well in other areas of Riverside County based on comments from references of
previous work.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded by Measure A and Development
Impact Fees. The water main improvements will be paid for by R.C.W.D. Funds are available
for the construction contract of $1,716,637.50 and the contingency of $171,663.75 for a
· total of construction cost of $1,888,301.25. R.C.W.D. will reimburse the City $647,453.00.
Attachment:
Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction Contract
Notice of Proposed Negative Declaration
Mitigation Monitoring Program
pwO4~agdrpt\95\l 114~pw94--lO.awd
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. P W94-10
WAL CO TT CORRIDOR
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of November, 1995, by and between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Hemet
Manufactueing Company, Inc. dbe Genesis Cor~i, dcljon, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW94-10
WALCOTr CORRIDOR, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and
amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT
NO. RN94-10 WALCO'I'F CORRIDOR. Copies of these Standard Specifications are
available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW94-10 WALCOTT CORRIDOR.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the
other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting
portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete
detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and
that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR
shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved
in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA- 1 r:\cip\projects\pw94-10\contract
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding
as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall
be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility
and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW94,-10 WALCOTI' CORRIDOR
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with
the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove
enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work
performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY
or its authorized representatives.
4.. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept
in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: ONE MILLION SEVEN
HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN DOLLARS and FIFTY CENTS
-($1 ,71 6,637.50),the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed one hundred & eighty (180)
working days, commencing .with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not
commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City
Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions
to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council.
6. PAYMENTS.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after
submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTORshall be paid a sum equal
to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule.
Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each
successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any
part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final
payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final
Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied
by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is
demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the
amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments
on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
CONTRACT CA-2 r:\cip~projects\pw94-10~contract
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant
to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is
hereby incorporated by reference.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the
CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and
correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000-$75,000
$75,000-$500,000
Over $500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
8. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section
53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed
pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due
to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to
or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will
not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without
the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR
is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
9. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above,
CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to
the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance
by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related
to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity
agreement with each claim for payment.
10.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor
Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY,
as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer,
worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done
under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of
CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip\projects\pw94-10\contract
the Contract.
11.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
13.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
14.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
'affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
16.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
17.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
18.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects\pw94-10\contract
19.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment I~ractices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
21.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first
above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
l
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip\projects\pw94-10\contract
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Notice of Proposed Negative Declaration
RECE!",/2-L...
PROJECT:
APPLICANT:
Walcott Corridor Street Improvements (PW94-10).
City of Temecula Public Works Department.
AUG 0 9 1995
C;Tf OF Ti~,fECUi.A
ENG!NEERING DEPARTMENT
LOCATION:
Nicolas Road to Calle Girasol to Calle Chapos to Walcott Road.
DESCRIYrION:
The construction of a two lane (32 foot wide pavement) road connecting Nicolas
Road to La Serena Way.
The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based
upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this
project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment.
As a result, the City Council intends to adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation
Monitoring Program for this project on September 12, 1995.
The Comment Period for this proposed Negative Declaration is August 14, 1995 to September 5,
1995. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed
below at the following address: City of Temecula, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA
92590.
The public notice of the intent to adopt this Negative Declaration is provided through:
X__ The Local Newspaper. X_.. llosting the Site. X__ Notice to Adjacent Property Owners.
If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact
and Title)
R:\FAGANI~BF..NVIRONXWALCOTT.PND 818/95 mf
City of Temecula
Pl3nning Department'
Initial Environmental Study
I. BACKGROUND INFORMA~ON
1. Name of Project:
2. Case Numbers:
3. Location of Project:
4. Description of Project:
5. Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Name of Proponent:
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
Walcott Corridor Street Improvements
PW94-10
Nicolas Road to Calle Girasol to Calle Chapos to Walcott Road
The construction of a two lane (32 foot wide pavement) road
connecting Nicolas Road to La Serena Way
August 4, 1995
City of Temecula Public Works Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 694-6411
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section III)
YeS
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures? _
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering
of the soil? X
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features? __
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site? X
f. Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion? X
g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake? X
Maybe No
X
X
R:\STAFFRP'BWALCOTT.I$ 814195 klb ]
Y~ Maybe N._9.o
h,
Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, Found
failure, or similar hazards?
i. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
C,
Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any
change in climate, whether locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a,
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b,
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
mount of surface runoff?.
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the mount of surface water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not limited to, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g~
Change in the quantity of Found waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
b,
Reduction in the mount of water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a,
Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPTXWALCOTY.I$ $14195 klb 2
Yes Maybe No
,
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique; rare, threatened, or
endangered species of plants? __
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? X
d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop? __
Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthie organisms, and/or insects)? _
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals? __
c. The introduction of new wildlife species inW an area? __
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals? __
e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels? X
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations? X
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare? X
Land Use. Will the proposal result
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? __
b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described
in a community or general plan? __
Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT~WALEOTT.IS 8/4/95 lifo 3
Yes Maybe N._~o
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal result in:
11.
12.
A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous
substances includes, but is not limited to, pesticicles, chemicals,
oil or radiation)?
The use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals,
or radiation)?
C,
Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population of an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand
for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
14.
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?
Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including
public transportation?
Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTF.IS gl4/95 kib 4
Yes Maybe N__9_o
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
L Other governmental services:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water systems?
d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage systems?
f. Solid waste disposal systems?
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of
utility delivery system improvements for any of the above?
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard?
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic pollutant emissions?
18. Aestheties. Will the proposal result in:
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public?
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area?
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTr. IS g/419,~ klb 5
YeS Maybe No
20. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result-in:
a,
The alteration or destruction of any paleontOlogic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site?
x
h,
Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
X
Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
X
d,
Restrictions to existing. religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
X
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTr. IS 814195 klb 6
IH. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRO~AL IMPACTS
].a.
No. The proposal will not result in unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures.
Any potential unstable conditions shall be mitigated through planting of slopes for erosion control
(consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and Ordinance No. 457) and through proper
compaction of the soils. Consu'uction and grading for this development will not be at depths which
would affect any geologic substructures. No impacts are foreseen as a result of this project.
1.b.
Yes. The proposal will result in the disruption, displacement, compaction, or overcovering of the
soil. The project will require grading, and all grading activity requires disruptions, displacements,
compaction and overcovering of the soil. Cut and fill slopes will be created, as well as additional
roadway. The amount of disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of the soil will
be the minimum mount needed to realize the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
1.C.
Yes. The proposal will result in a change in the site topography and ground surface relief features.
As discussed in response 1 .b., only the minimum amount of grading necessary to create the
roadway (including cut and fill areas) will be conducted. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
1.d.
No. The proposal will not result in the destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features. No unique geologic features exist on the site. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
1 .e,f.
Yes. This project will result in increased wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site and
in changes in siltation, deposition, and erosion. Grading will occur during the construction phase
for the project. The potential for wind and water erosions of soil will increase from the creation
of manufactured slopes. Short-term impacts will be mitigated through grading techniques that are
consistent with Air Quality regulations and best grading practices. Long-term impacts will be
mitigated through slope landscaping and the construction of the roadway. Erosion control measures
will be implemented and will have to be consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and
Ordinance No. 457. Ordinance No. 457 has. 'requirements for plant types and spacing which
provides erosion control that will be effective. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
1.g.
Yes. The proposal will result in minor modifications to several existing drainage channels.
According to the Hydrology and Hydraulics Report for the Walcott Corridor (prepared by Robert
Bein, William Frost and Associates dated December, 1994), the Walcon Lane segment of the
corridor will cross four existing stream beds. Storm drain facilities will be installed at each of
these locations. The Report further states that an existing stream traverses Calle Chapos at four
separate locations. The proposed improvements will limit the stream crossing to two locations
along Calle Chapos. Prior to any modification to the channel, clearances will need to be obtained
from the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Deparunent of Fish and Game. This will
assure that any potential impacts are mitigated to a level less than significant. The project will not
result in modifications to any wash, creek, river or lake since none are proximate to the site. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS 8/4195 klb 7
1.h.
1. i.
Air
2.a,b.
2.c.
Water
3.a.
3.b.
3.c.
3.d.
Maybe. Development of the project may expose people and property to earthquake hazards
because the projea is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. The
project does not include any habitable structures; however, as discussed in responses 11 and 12,
the projea is growth inducing. The project will not expose people or property to geologic hazards
such as landslides, mudslides, ground failure or liquefaction. No known landslides are located on
the site or proximate to the site. The same is true for mudslides. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The proposal does not include development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone as
identified by the State of California, Resource Agency Department of Conservation Special Studies
Zone Map. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Yes. The project will result in increased air emissions and has a potential to deteriorate ambient
air quality in the short-run. Air emissions and objeaionable odors will probably occur during the
construction phase of the project. These impacts will be of short duration and are not considered
significant. The General Plan Final EIR (page 11) states Air Quality is regionally significant, but
locally mitigated to a level of insignificance. Therdore, although there will be additional air
emissions, there will be no deterioration of ambient air quality locally in the long run. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The project will not result in alterations of .air movement, temperature, or moisture, or in any
change in climate either locally or regionally. The scale of the project precludes it from creating
any significant impacts on the environment in this area.
Yes. The proposal will result in changes to currents, and in changes to the course or direction of
water movements in fresh waters. Modifications are proposed to an unnamed draw that traverses
Calle Chapos at four separate locations. The proposed improvements will modify the draw,
limiting the crossing to two locations (reference response 1.b). The modifications will not be
significant, therefore; no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Yes. The proposal will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage panems and the rate and
amount of surface runoff. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by
construction of the roadway. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, impacts shall
be mitigated through the numerous drainage improvements that are included as part of this project.
Any graded slopes will be planted to prevent erosion and additional runoff. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The proposal will not result in alterations to the course or flow of flood waters. The project
is not located adjacent to the one hundred year flood plain, is not located within an identified
floodway and is not within the Dam Inundation area identified in Figure 74 of the City of
Temecula General Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Maybe. The proposal could result in a change in the amount of surface water in any waterbody.
As mentioned above under response 3.a., modifications are proposed to an unnamed draw that
R:~TAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS I/4/95 klb 8
traverses Calle Chapos at four separate locations. Surfaces will be rendered impervious as a result
of this project and any residential development that occurs as a result of the project and this could
result in an increase in amount and velocity of surface water in the draws. Any potential impacts
will be mitigated through drainage conveyances Which are proposed to be included as part of the
project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.e.
Maybe. The proposal could result in discharges into surface waters or in any alteration of surface
water quality. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the project, the applicant will have to
comply with the provisions of a National Polhtant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit
from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES
Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the
NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant.
Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.f.
No. The proposal will not result in an alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwaters.
Construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a 'significant impact on ground
waters. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.g.
3.h.
No. The proposal will not result in a change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations. Reference
response 3.f. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The project will not result in the reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for
public water supplies. The project does not propose any use that would generate a need for water
provision. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.i.
No. The proposal will not expose people or property to water related hazards such as flooding.
Reference response 3.d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Plant Life
4.a,b.
Maybe. The proposal may- result in a change to the diversity of species, or number of any native'
species of plants, in a reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered
species of plants and in the creation of a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species on-
site. According to Page 6 of the Biological Resources Study: Walcott Corridor Street Improvement
(dated August 26, 1994) prepared by SJM Biological Consultants, dated December 4, 1994,
portions of the site are covered by Coastal Sage Scrub and riparian plant communities. Mitigation
measures for the Gnatcatcher shall include construction of Walcott Lane to be done outside the
usual nesting season of the Gnatcatcher. Mitigation measures in place during the construction phase
shall include erosion control measures and staking areas that construction vehicles shall be
prohibited from entering/disturbing. The Report concludes on page 9, any impacts to the stream
crossing Walcott Lane could require a 1601 streambed alteration agreement from the California
Department of Fish and Game. If required, the permit application will be accompanied by a
mitigation plan which normally includes site restoration. As a result of these mitigation measures,
no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:~STAFFRPT~WALCOTr. I$ ~14t95 klb 9
4.c.
Yes. The project will result in the introduction of new species of plants inw an area of native
vegetation and create a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species. Most of the area
is already disturbed and is currently being used as a roadway. Slopes graded for the project will
need to be planted for erosion control, and this will introduce non-native species to the area. This
planting will be adjacent to an area that has previously been disturbed. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
4.d.
No. The project will not result in a reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop. The City
of Temecula Final Enviromental Impact Report (FEIR) did not identify the site as farmland of
local importance. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.a,b,d,e.
Maybe. The project may result in a change in the diversity of species, or numbers of species of
animals. The projea site does lie within the Stephem Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan Fee
Area. According to Appendix A of the Biological Resources Study: Walcott Corridor Street
Improvement (dated August 26, 1994) signs of SKR were not found within the limits of the project
right-of-way. For other species, reference the responses to 4.a. and 4.b. above. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.c.
No. The proposal will not result in the introduction of any new wildlife species inw the area.
Projects of this nature do not introduce new wildlife species into the area. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
Noise
6.a.
Yes. The proposal could result in increases to existing noise levels from increased traffic since the
road is currently unimproved (dirt). In addition,. noise levels will increase during the construction
phase of the project. The Walcott Corridor is not identified as a roadway that will produce
significant noise beyond the right-of-way at buildout of the City according to Figure 8-5 of the
City'S General Plan (Future Roadway Noise Contours). No significant impacts from noise are
anticipated as a result of this project.
6.b.
Yes. The project will expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction
phase. Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100
feet which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure.
This source of noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. As
discussed in response 6.a., vehicle noise will not affect any sensitive receptors in the area. No
significant impacts are anticipated either in the short- or long-run.
6.c.
Yes. The proposal will result in the exposure of people to severe vibrations during the
development/construction phase. The vibrations will be of short duration and therefore are not
considered significant. The proposal will not result in the exposure of people to severe vibrations
over the long-run. No significant impacts are anticipated either in the short or long run.
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS 8/4/95 lab l0
Light and Glare
,
Yes. The proposal will ultimately produce and result in additional sources of light and glare. It
is anticipated that additional night vehicle trips will be generated on the improved roadway.
Motorists traveling at night will use their headlamps to illuminate the roadway. Some stray
illumination may reflect upon houses in the area. This illumination of the roadway is not
considered significant. Street lamps are not proposed as pan of the project. No significant impacts
are foreseen from light and glare.
Land Use
8.a.
Maybe. The proposal may .alter the present land use of the area since there are undeveloped
parcels in the area. With the improvement of the Walcott Corridor, some of the land owners may
be motivated to develop their parcels. Currently, people interested in subdividing their property
are required to improve their property to a City maintained road. This means improving portions
of the Walcott Corridor. This has proven to be cost prohibitive for small subdivisions. Vacant
parcels have the potential to be developed with the improvements included in this project. Because
of the General Plan land use designation of properties in the vicinity of the area (low-medium
density residential, 3-6 dwelling units/acre and very low density residential, .2-.4 dwelling units
per acre) the impacts will be negligible. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
8.b.
No. The proposal will not result in an alteration to the future planned land use in the vicinity of
the project as described City's General Plan. The General Plan Land Use designations for
properties in the vicinity of the project are (low-medium density residential, 3-6 dwelling units/acre
and very low density residential, .2-.4 dwelling units per acre). No changes to the General Plan
Land Use Designations are proposed as a result of this project. The General Plan Circulation Plan
identifies the Walcott Corridor as a Optional Rural Arterial Highway and this is how the project
is going to be developed. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Natural Resources
9.a,b.
Yes. The proposal will result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource and the
depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in a minor incremental
increase in the rate of use of natural resources (construction materials, fuels for the dally operation,
asphalt, etc.) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the
scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen as significant.
Risk of Upset-
10.a,b.
Maybe. The proposal may result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions. The project is a proposal to pave a currently
unimproved roadway. As a result of the roadway improvements, traffic will increase on the
Walcott Corridor. The increase in traffic may result in the increase in the probability of risk of
explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset
conditions. The same is true for the use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials. Due to the limited traffic which is expected from this project, and the fact that the
Walcott Corridor is not identified as a truck route, no significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.I$ Sl4195 lab l l
lO.c.
No. The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation
plan. With the addition of a fire station east of Interstate 15, existing emergency response plans
and/or emergency evaluation plans will be enhanced through the contribution of an all-weather road
in this area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Population
11. Maybe. The project may result in altering the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the
human population of the area. Reference response 8.a. and 8.b. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Housin1·
12.
Maybe. Reference response I 1. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Transportation/Circulation
13.a.
No. The proposal will not result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movement.
Vehicular traffic is anticipated to increase because the roadway will be improved from din to
asphalt. The roadway will be twenty-eight (28) feet wide and is classified as an Optional Rural
Arterial Highway in the City's General Plan, and is not designed to carry substantial numbers of
vehicles. No significant impacts are expected from development of the site.
13.b.
No. The project will not result in an increased demand for new parking. The project does not
propose any use that would generate a need for parking. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
13.c.
No. The proposal will not create impacts upon existing transportation systems, including public
transportation. Walcott Corridor improvements are classified as Priority I in the City of Temecula
Capital Improvement Program 1996-2000. The scope of work is described as environmental
analysis, design and construction of an interim two lane roadway to extend from the intersection
of Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa to Calle Chapos to Calle Girasol to Walcott Road to La Serena'
Way. Design of the improvements are slated for fiscal years 1994-95 and 1995-96 and construction
and administration in fiscal year 1995-96. This will provide an additional north-south route in this
portion of the City. No i/nprovements to the public transportation systems are proposed in this
area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.d.
No. The proposal will not result in alterations to present paRems of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods. Currently, there is circulation or movement of people and/or goods in the
area. Vehicular traffic is anticipated to increase because the roadway will be improved from din
to asphalt; however, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.e.
No. The proposal will not result in alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic since none exists
currently in the proximity of the site and none are proposed. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCO~f. I3 ~/4/95 klb 1~2
13.f.
Yes. The proposal will resuk in an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians. Any increase in traffic by motor'vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians will result in an
increase in traffic hazards. Current and future conditions are typical conditions that exist at any
interface between pedestrians, bicyclists and automobiles. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
Public Services
14.a,b.
No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire
protection or new or altered police protection. The project does not propose any use that would
generate a need for new or altered fire or police protection. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
14.c,d.
No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
school facilities or new or altered parks or other recreational facilities. This project does not
propose any use that would generate a need for school facilities or new or altered parks or other
recreational facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.e.
Yes. The proposal will result in a need for the maintenance of public facilities, including roads.
Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City
of Temecula from the State of California and local assessments. Impacts to current and future
needs for maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site are incremental and are not
considered significant. This is because the Gasoline Tax and the local assessments are sufficient
to cover any of the proposed expenses. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
14.f.
No. The proposal will not have a substantial affect upon or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services. Reference response 14.e. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
Energy
15.a.
No. The proposal will not result in the use of substantial mounts of fuel or energy. As mentioned
in responses 9.a. and 9.b. the proposal may result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural
resource or the depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in an
increase in the rate of use of natural resources (construction materials, fuels for the dally operation,
asphalt, etc.) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the
nature of this project (a roadway), impacts are not seen as significant.
15.b.
No. The project will not result in a substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy,
nor will the project require the dev. elopment of new sources of energy. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Utilities
16.a-d,f.
N0. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to power or
natural gas, communication systems, water systems, sewer systems, solid waste disposal systems.
The project does not propose any use or uses that would generate in a need for these new systems
R:~STAFFRFI~WALCOTr. I3 Sl4/95 Idb 13
or substantial alterations to existing system. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
16.e.
Yes. The proposal will result in a need for a minor addition to on-site swrm water drainage
systems. Drainage conveyances will be required which will safely and adequately handle any of
the runoff which is created by the realization of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
16.g.
No. The proposal will not result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system
improvements for any of the above. (reference response No. 16.a-d,f. ). No significant impacts are
anticipated as. a result of this project.
Human Health
17.a,b.
No. The proposal will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard:
Projects of this nature do not result in the creation of health hazards or potential health hazards.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Aesthetics
18.a--c.
No. The proposal will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public,
in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view, or in detrimental visual
impacts on the surrounding area. The project is a proposal to pave a din road which is already
being used and for associated grading that will be required by the project. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
Recreation
19.
No. The proposal will not result in impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational
resources or opportunities. The project does not propose any use that would impact the quality
or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this projea.
Cultural Resources
20.a.
Maybe. The proposal may result in the alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or hisWric site or structure. The site has been previously disturbed. The City
General Plan identified this area as an "Area of Sensitivity for Archaeological Resources". Any
future impacts will be mitigated through the application of standard City paleontologic and
archaeologic development condkions. In addition, if needed, onsite archaeologic and Native
American heritage resource experts' will moniWr activities on the site." No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
20.b-d.
No. The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values. No "unique" ethnic cultural values have been identified on or in proximity
to the site. The proposal will not result in restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area. None currently exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
R:~TAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS ~/4/95 kib 14
IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIHCANCE
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal
species, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
Yes
Maybe No
X
Does the project have the potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals? (A short term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, de~m'tive period of
time while long term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
X
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is significant.)
X
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
R:%STAFFRP~WALCO1'F.]~ 8/4/95 ]rJb 15
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and
in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will
mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Prepared by: Matthew' Fagan, Assistant Planner
· ~ ~ame and Title
ate
R:XSTAFFRP~WALCOTT.I$ g/4/95 klb ]{5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manag~
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
August 30, 1995
Walcott Corridor Street Improvements (PW94-10) Negative Declaration
Mitigation Measures
The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the mitigation measures for the Walcott Corridor
Street Improvements (PW94-10) which are identified in the Initial Environmental Study (IF.S) for the
project. The IES for development of the Walcott Corridor Street Improvements was completed on
July 31, 1995. The IES evaluated the potential for adverse environmental impacts and identified
several potentially significant impacts to the environment. The adverse impacts were in the areas
of earth, water, plant life, animal life and cultural resources. The Initial Environmental Study also
identified that these potentially significant impacts could be mitigated to a level of insignificance
through the incorporation of certain features into the design of the project.
Listed below are the Mitigation Measures which must be incorporated into the project to reduce the
potentially significant impacts associated with this project. The impacts and mitigation measures are
as follows:
1. IMPACT:
An increase'in wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site and in
changes in siltation, deposition, and erosion.
MEASURE: Short-term impacts will be mitigated through grading techniques that
are consistent with Air Quality regulations and best grading practices.
Long-term impacts will be mitigated through site landscaping and the
· construction of hardscape. Erosion control measures will have to be
consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and Ordinance No.
457.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Department of Public Works
2. IMPACT:
Minor modifications to several existing drainage channels and in
changes to the course or direction of water movements in fresh
waters.
MEASURE: Clearances will need to be obtained from the Army Corps of
Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Department of Public Works
R:\PLANN1NGXWALCOTT.MEM 8/30/95 idb
IMPACT:
Changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and
amount of surface runoff and in the amount of surface water in any
waterbody.
MEASURE: Drainage conveyances shall be provided to safely and adequately
handle any of the runoff which is created by the project.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Depatu/tent of Public Works
IMPACT:
MEASURE:
Discharges into surface waters which will result in alterations to
surface water quality.
Comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources
Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES
Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Depatintent of Public Works
IMPACT:
A change to the diversity of species, or number of any native species
of plants, in a reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare,
threatened, or endangered species of plants and in the creation of a
barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species on-site.
MEASURE: Construction of Walcott Lane shall be done outside the usual nesting
season of the Gnatcatcher. Further, erosion control measures and
staking areas for construction vehicles be prohibited from
entering/disturbing portions of the site which are covered by riparian
plant communities. Any impacts to the stream crossing Walcott Lane
could require a I601 streambed alteration agreement and may need to
be accompanied by a mitigation plan which normally includes site
restoration from the California Department of Fish and Game.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Planning Department and Department of Public Works
6. IMPACT:
A change in the diversity of species, or numbers of species of
animals.
MEASURE: See Measure for No. 4.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Planning Department and Depathnent of Public Works
R:~PLANNIN(3'~WALCOTT.MEM 8/30/95 klb
,
IMPACT:
The proposal may result in the alteration or destruction of any
paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic site or structure.
MEASURE:
When necessary, a paleontologist/archaeologist or representative shall
have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading
activity to allow recovery of fossils. Application of standard City
paleontologic and archaeologic development procedures. In addition,
if needed, onsite archaeologic and Native American heritage resource
experts will monitor activities on the site.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Planning Department and Department of Public Works
R:\pLANNINGXWALCOTT.MEM .8/30/95 klb
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM
1
MINUTES* OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD OCTOBER 10, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:45 PM at
the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Ron
Roberts presiding·
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Stone, Roberts
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, Assistant General Counsel Greg Diaz and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Director Parks announced he would abstain on Item No. 3.
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar
Items No. 1-3.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
'ABSENT:
Minutes
1.1
DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Stone, Roberts
DIRECTORS: None
0 DIRECTORS: None
Approve the minutes of September 26, 1995.
Acceptance of Grant Deed for Nicolas Road Park - Coscan Davidson Temecula, Inc.
2.1 Accept a grant deed from Coscan Davidson Temecula, Inc. for the dedication of
Nicolas Road Park, a 2.93 acre park within Tract 27827-1;
2.2 Direct the City Clerk to record the document.
Minutes.csd\101095 -1 - 1011 1/95
3. Reduction of Faithful Performance Bond for Tract 25004-1, Barclay Estates
3.1
Authorize the reduction of the Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond to
a 10% warranty amount for the construction of the TCSD slopes and landscaped
area within Tract No. 25004-1, Barclay Estates.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENah
ABSTAIN:
DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Stone, Roberrs
DIRECTORS: None
DIRECTORS: None
1 DIRECTORS: Parks
DISTRICT BUSINESS
4. Rotary Park - Lease Aareement
Deputy Community Services Director Herman Parker presented the staff report.
Director Stone asked if the City has investigated receiving this property as a gift.
Deputy Director Parker stated this had not been explored.
Director Birdsall, addressing the property tax exemption on the property, stated this
exemption has been delayed due to a technicality with the "Articles of Incorporation" of
the Town Association. She explained that an amendment has been filed and she has full
confidence that the tax exempt status will be obtained.
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
4.1
Approve the Lease Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Temecula Town
Association in substantially the form submitted for the operation and
maintenance of Rotary Park.
4.2 Approve the official name of this proposed park site to be Rotary Park.
The motion was unanimously 'carried.
Naming of a Newly Acauired Park Site
Deputy Community Services Director Herman Parker presented the staff report.
Minutes .csd~ 101095 -2- 1011 1195
Dennis Chiniaeff, 29321 Via Norte suggested naming the park "Kaiser Pond", since Kaiser
was the original developer of this area.
Director Birdsall suggested naming the park "David F. Dixon Memorial Park" after the
City's first City Manager David F. Dixon. Director Lindemans stated he concurs with
this recommendation.
RECESS
President Roberrs called a brief recess at 8:00 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 8:02 PM.
Director Stone suggested resubmitting this item to the Community Services Commission
with the recommended names suggested by the City Council and the public.
Director Birdsall stated she does 'not have a problem with naming the park the David F.
Dixon Memorial Park with ("The Duck Pond") placed under the name in parenthesis on the
sign.
Director Roberrs stated he is also in favor of naming the park David F. Dixon Memorial
Park. Director Parks also concurred.
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Lindemans to resubmit the
naming of the park to the Community Services Commission, with recommended names
suggested by the City Council and the public. The motion was unanimously carried.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson reported that Nicolas Road Park and the Voorburg
Park will be dedicated, Thursday, October 19, 1995 at Nicolas Road Park at 3:00 PM. He also
reported the lighting system at Temecula Middle School will be operational next week.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
Minutes.csd\101095 -3- 1011 1/95
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberrs to adjourn at 8:08 PM to a meeting
on October 17, 1995, time certain following the City Council Consent Calendar, Community
Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
Ronald J. Roberrs, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Board Secretary
Minutes.csd\101095 -4- 1011 1/95
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELP OCTOBER 17, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:45
PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
President Ron Roberrs presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lind.roans, Stone, Roberrs
I DIRECTORS: Parks
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve Consent
Calendar Items 1-2. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Parks absent.
1. Community Services Recreation Brochure
1.1 Approve purchase order of $15,618 from Graphics Unlimited to print one (1)
issue of the Community Services Recreation Brochure.
2. Release of Bond for Nicolas Road Park - Coscan Homes California, Inc.
2.1 Authorize the release of the Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance' Bond
for the construction of Nicolas Road Park - Coscan Homes California, Inc.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Marqarita Community Park, Master Plan
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
Deputy Director Herman Parker discussed the process associated with Master Plan.
Vince DiDonato, Alhambra Group, discussed specific aspects of the plan.
r:\minutes.csd~101795 -1 * 10127195
Director Birdsall asked if the City has coordinated this planning process with the
School District. Deputy Community Services Director Herman Parker stated a
representative of the School District has served on the Design Committee, and the
Master Plan will be taken to the School Board for their approval.
Director Birdsall asked if parking will be adequate for this park. Community
Services Director Shawn Nelson stated that the Committee analyzed the parking and
180 spaces should be adequate not only for phase one but for the ultimate park
development.
RECESS
President Roberts called a brief recess at 8:00 PM to change tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 8:02 PM.
Director Stone asked if a rudimentary path from the park to the Target Center would
be cost prohibitive. Community Services Director Nelson stated this could be
included in the bid if it is the Board's desire.
President Roberts agreed the path should be included.
President Roberrs opened the public hearing at 8:05 PM.
Claudia Mecham, 42087 Selby Circle, expressed concerns about security. She
stated graffiti has recently been a problem and said she would be happy to put
together a volunteer group to help remove graffiti. She also expressed concern
about traffic and asked that the 45 mph zone in front of the park be investigated.
President Roberrs asked that traffic concerns be referred to the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission.
Director Stone stated the City has purchased a graffiti truck and it is City policy that
graffiti is removed within a 24 hour period. He also said a design factor of the park
is drive-through acces~ to accommodate police patrols.
President Roberts closed the public hearing 8:07 PM.
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
3.1 Approve the Master Plan for Margarita Community Park.
3.2 Authorize the release of a formal public bid for the development of Margarita
Community Park.
The motion was unanimously carried with Director Parks absent.
r:~minutes .csd\l 01795 -2- 10~27~95
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
None given.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 8:11 PM to
a meeting on November 14, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with
Director Parks absent.
Ronald J. Roberrs, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
District Secretary
r:\minutes.csd~101795 -3- 10/27/95
ITEM 2
APPROV
CITY ATTORN~RY~O~
FINANCE DIRE 0
CITY MANAG
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council *
Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
November 14, 1995
Quitclaim of Easement Within Margarita Community Park.
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
,Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
That the City Council:
Accept a quitclaim deed from Eastern Municipal Water District for an easement on the
Margarita Community Park Site, and authorize the City Clerk to record the document with the
Riverside County Recorder's Office.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the recordation of the Final Order and Judgement in
Condemnation on May 19, 1994, the City of Temecula officially acquired fee interest to the
real property identified as the future Margarita Community Park. The twenty (20) acre parcel
is located on the south side of Margarita Road, just west of Temecula Elementary School,
During the Master Planning stages for the park, a review of the preliminary title report
indicated that an Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) easement was recorded on the
property on November 18, 1971 (Instrument No. 132260). The easement is twenty (20) feet
wide and traverses approximately 1,057 feet across the southeasterly corner of the park
property. EMWD verified that no utilities currently exist within the easement, and indicated
that there were no plans for any future improvements.
As a result, staff felt that the City should acquire the easement to assure protection of the
park improvements against any future construction by others. Upon request, EMWD prepared
the quitclaim deed, legal description and plat which transfers control of this easement to the
City. The document has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the City
Attorney. On October 18, 1995, the EMWD Board of Directors approved the quitclaim deed
for this easement and subsequently forwarded the document to the City Council for
acceptance and recordation.
FISCAL IMPACT: A fee of 9300 was paid to EMWD for the preparation and
processing of the quitclaim document through Account No. 210-190-119-5804. No other
fiscal impacts are anticipated through the acquisition of the EMWD easement.
ATTACHMENTS:
Copy of Quitclaim Deed, Legal Description and Plat.
r: \yminobkhnm'gpadc .qtc 111495
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
Eastern Municipal Water District
P.O. Box 8300
San Jacinto, CA 92581-8300
Attn: Don. Simpson, Manager
Right-of-Way Department
This Document Must Be Signed in Presence of
Notary & Notarized.
No Recording Fee Required Pursuant to Government
Code Section 27383
QUITCLAIM DEED
APN: 921-300-006
RB-914
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal
place of business at San Jacinto, California, does hereby rernise, release, and quitclaim to:
CITY OF TEMECULA
owner(s), of record, of the below described parcel of land, all right, title or interest in and to right(s) of way(s) or
easement(s) which the District may have acquired under or by virtue of that Grant of Easement deed recorded
November 18, 1971 as Instrument No. 132260, Official Records of Riverside County, California, more particularly
described as follows:
(SEE EXHIBITS "A"AND "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF)
This quitclaim comes with the understanding- that all 'liability associated with the relinquishment of any interest held
by Eastern Municipal Water District, above or below the ground, shall be assumed by the Grantee and Grantee's
successors heirs and assigns.
ATTEST:
hite, Secreta;-yW o~ the
Eastern Municipal Water District
and the Board of Directors
thereof
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
· General Manager
'\\"- ~
SEAL
Quitclaim Easement Interest
6/95 form
3rate of CAI T FORN T A
County of RIVERSIDF
C)n 10/26/95
DATE
NOTARY
before me, MARILYN CHAISONGKRAMJ PURl TC
N~E. ~ OF OFFICER- EG,. 'JANE DOF_ NOTARY PUBLIC'
personally appeared
~ personally known to me - OR
iARILYN CHAISONGKRA
" COMM. 11074309
..... ,JOHN R, RRUDIN AND MARY C, WHITE-
NAMEiS1 OF SIGNERf S)
[] proved to me on thc bQ,~is of 3atEfactory cvidonce
to be the person(s) whose name(s)-is~are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that hc:ch=lthey executed
the same in h;,c,:hcr/their authorized
caDaciW-(-ies), and that by hisf+H~/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
acted. executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
THIS CERTIFICATE
MUST BE ATTACHED
TO THE DOCUMENT
DESCRIBED AT RIGHT:
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY StGI~ER
i'} INDIVIDUAL(S)
I'l CORPORATE
OFRCER(Si
[] PARTNER(Si
[] ATTORNEY-;N-FACT
[] TRUSTEE~S'~
[] SUBSCRIBING WITNE-:5
[] GUARDIAN. CCNSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING;
NAME OF PERSC~IS~ OR ENTITYnES~
FASTFRN HIINICIPAI
WATER DISTRICT
ATTENTION NOTARY: Altlqougn me ~nformatlon reQue$18o below ~s OPTIONAL =t coula prevent trauauten! at/3crtm~ll ot trlls Cemtic. ate [o unauznortzeO ccc'-'men~
Titte or Type of DocumentQUZTCLAIN DEED (CITY OF TEHECULA)
Number of Pages :~ APN: 92152~l~T~l~ment 10/26/95
signer(s) Other Than Named Above NA
":-:.:; ;":'_-'T...'-.__-.;. .................... =-'J'~"-"'- "-2:7-:~-'-: ' - -.' '-"-' '. - '
,:.' 1991 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinmet Ave. · -q O =_."x 7' 94 * C,,moca i;lf, CA '.-'::; '
EXHIBIT "A"
QUITCLAIM
OF AN EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT EASEMENT
APN: 921-300-006
GRANTEE: City of Temecula
Le~al Description
That certain easement granted to Eastern Municipal Water District
by virtue of the Grant of Easement Deed recorded November 18, 1971
as Instrument No. 132260, Official Records of Riverside County,
California, and being more particularly described as follows:
A strip of land 20.00 feet in width over a portion of Lot 14,
Tract NO. 3334, in the County of Riverside, State of
California, as per map recorded in Book 54 of Maps, Pages 25
to 30, Records of said County, lying 10.00 feet to each side
of the following described center line:
Beginning at a point in the southerly line of said Lot
14, distant thereon Nor.th 88°23'11" East, 304.57 feet
from the most westerly corner of said Lot:
Thence North 57o00'00" East, 75.56 feet;
Thence North 42020'00" East, 440.00 feet;
Thence South 88000'00" East, 350.00 feet;
Thence South 79005'00" East, 191.93 feet to a point in
the easterly line of said Lot, distant thereon North
00o55'34" West, 292.49 feet from the southeast corner of
said Lot.
Containing 0.49 acres more or less.
~//~
Oh
0
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
HELD OCTOBER 17, 1995
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
8:08 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. Vice Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 4
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberrs,
Stone
ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Parks
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson
and City Clerk June S. Greek·
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberrs to approve
Consent Calendar Item No. 1.
AYES: 4
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts,
Stone
NOES:
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1
AGENCY MEMBERS: Parks
Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 10, 1995.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Ronald Bradley stated the Entertainment Project is moving forward and
public hearings on financing will be held on November 14, 1995.
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None given.
r:~minutes.rda\101795 -1 - 10~27~95
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to
adjourn at 8:13 PM to a meeting on November 14, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation
Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously
carried with Chairperson Parks absent.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Agency Secretary
r:\minutes.rda\l O1795 -2- 10/27/95
ITEM 2
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI R
CITY 'MANAG
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENCY REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
November 14, 1995
Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council consider approval of an RDA small business loan to the Health Zone
(natural/health food store) to be located at the Temecula Plaza, Ynez and Solana Way.
DISCUSSION:
The City has received an application from the Health Zone to move to a new location and to
expand their facilities. The business was founded in 1990 by Paul Cook and Tom Watson.
Since the opening, sales have increased to where larger facilities are needed to better serve
its customers and the new location will double the floor space with better customer exposure
and parking. With the move, the Health Zone will also be able to offer new and expanded
product lines. It is projected that this move will allow the business to increase sales by 50%
in the first twelve months.
The new property will be leased for a term of 5 years (60 months) with one 5 year option.
The loan amount requested is 9100,000. The loan proceeds will be used for tenant
improvements, interior store fixtures and new refrigeration units.
The total requirement for the expansion is estimated at 9130,000 of which the additional
930,000 is coming from business reserves.
The terms of the loan are as follows: 9100,000amortized over a 5 year period at a rate of
9.75% with payments of 92112.42per month. The loan is secured by all existing equipment
and all new equipment purchased for the expansion.
This loan is in conform.ance with the criteria of the RDA loan program and has been reviewed
by our independent loan committee.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The loan approval would be subject to the receipt of a detailed list of the existing equipment
to be used at the new location { including but not limited to serial numbers, description and
estimated worth) plus at the completion of the project, a list of all new equipment ( including
but not limited to serial numbers, description and cost). The City will file a UCC-1 and
Landlord's waiver on the furniture, fixtures and equipment. Funds will be controlled during
the construction of the tenant improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
To date, the City has funded $209,400 in redevelopment loans.
ITEM 3
CITY ATTORNAEPYPROV~
FINANCE OFFICER ' /~"
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Redevelopment Agency Board Members
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director ~:2/_,/~
November 14, 1995
Proposed Amendments to the Bylaws of the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory
Committee
PREPARED BY:
David W. Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the Agency review and approve the proposed amendments to the Bylaws
of the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Temecula began the process to modify the Stipulated Judgement in early 1994.
On August 7, 1995, Riverside County Superior Court approved the Modification to the
Stipulated Judgement. One of the components being modified was the size of the Old Town
Redevelopment Advisory Committee. These changes require that the Committee's Bylaws be
amended.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed amendments would make the Committee's Bylaws consistent with the approved
modifications to the Stipulated Judgement. The Advisory Committee reviewed the Bylaw
amendments at their November 7, 1995 meeting. Their comments and recommendation will
be provided to the Agency Board as part of Staff's presentation.
Attachments:
1. Proposed Committee Bylaws
2. Redline(addition)/Strikeout(deletion) Version of Committee Bylaws
R:\REDEV\BYLAWS.RPT 11/6/95 dwh 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
R:\REDEV\BYLAWS.RPT 11/2/95 dwh 2
BYLAWS OF THE
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
ARTICLE I
Purpose of the Committee
The Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee ("Committee") shall serve as the
means through which the community can participate with the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") in the planning and implementing of the
Redevelopment Plan (" Plan") for the Old Town portion of the Temecula Redevelopment
Project Area No. 1-1988 ("Old' Town Area"). The Old Town Area is delineated on the
map attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. To accomplish this, the
Committee will review, evaluate and submit written reports to the Agency and/or the
City on any and all redevelopment actions proposed to be undertaken by the Agency
and/or the City in furtherance of redevelopment conducted within the Old Town Area.
ARTICLE II
Creation and Termination of the Committee
The Committee shall be created by resolution of the Agency and shall expire with the
termination of the Plan.
ARTICLE III
Members
Section 1. , Membership. The membership of the Committee shall consist
of five (5) members who shall be appointed, in the manner herein provided and
according to the conditions of eligibility herein provided. Members shall not receive
compensation for their service on the Committee.
Section 2. Eligibility for Membership.
A. "Eligible person" as used herein shall mean a natural person 18 years or
older who resides in the Old Town Area or who works in the Old Town Area and
owns, leases and/or operates a business entity (for profit or not for profit) which has
its principal place of business located within the boundaries of the Old Town Area.
B. For purposes of this section, a "principal place of business" may be
determined with reference to, without limitation, the annual statement of general
information required to be filed with the Secretary of State by every corporation
pursuant to Corporations Code Section 1502. For purposes of this section, residency
in the Old Town Area may be determined with reference to, without limitation, a
driver's license, tax or utility bill, or a business license.
R:\REDEV\OTAC\BYLAW.DFT 11/2/95 dwh
C. Failure to abide by the eligibility requirements stated herein shall be
deemed a vacancy subject to the provisions of Section 4 of this Article.
D. No current member of the Agency shall serve as a member of the
Committee.
Section 3. Membership Terms. The members of the Committee shall be
appointed by the Agency Board and shall serve at the pleasure of the Agency Board
for terms of four (4) years.
Section 4. Vacancies. Members serve at the pleasure of the Agency Board
and may be removed by the Board for any reason including, but not limited to:
A. By more than three (3) consecutive unexcused absences from any of the
meetings of the Committee.
B. By death of a member.
C. By resignation of a member.
D. By the failure of the member to maintain eligibility for membership as
specified in Article III, Section 2 herein.
E. Any vacancy occurring in the membership of the Committee shall be filled
by majority vote of the Agency by an eligible person for the remainder of the
unexpired term of the vacated member as set forth in Article IV.
Section 5. Political Reform Act Compliance. All members shall comply
with the disclosure and disqualification provisions of the Political Reform Act
(Government Code Section 87100 et seq.).
ARTICLE IV
Procedure for Appointing Committees Members
Section 1. Notice Reauired. Prior to the appointment of any member to the
Committee, the Agency shall advertise, in a public notice, that there is a vacancy on
the Committee and that it intends to appoint qualified individuals to the Committee.
Except, that a vacancy for part of an unexpired term with less than one year
remaining, may be filled by the Agency Board with any eligible person without the
public notice requirement described in Section 2 of this Article.
Section 2. Public Notice. "Public Notice" as required herein, shall mean
either or all of the following, as designated herein:
A. Notice sent via first-class United State mail service to all natural persons
who reside within the boundaries of the Old Town Area.
R:\REDEV\OTAC\BYLAW.DFT 11/2/95 dwh
B. Notice delivered to all business entities located within the boundaries of
the Old Town Area.
C. Notice posed at the fire station located within the Old Town Area, a
conspicuous place at Sam Hicks Park, a conspicuous place at the location of the
Temecula Community Center and at each lobby or entrance of all multi-family building
in the Old Town Area.
D. Notice published in a paper of general circulation within the Old Town
Area once a week for a period of two weeks.
ARTICLE V
Internal Organization and Staffing
Section 1. Officers. By majority vote of the members, there shall be
selected one member to act as chairperson and another member to act as vice
chairperson. The term of these offices shall be one year and no member holding the
same office for more than two consecutive terms. Vacancies in any of these offices
shall be filled by majority vote of the membership.
Section 2. Staff
A. Executive Director. The Executive Director of the Agency shall be
the Executive Director of the Committee. The Executive Director's duties shall
include, without limitation, assigning staff to support the Committee, and making
requests of the Agency for additional staffing and/or funds for the administration of
the Committee.
B. Secretary. The Secretary of the Agency shall act as the Secretary of
the Committee. The Secretary's duties shall include, without limitation, collecting and
distributing to each Committee member all non-privileged material and documentation
relating to proposed redevelopment activity by the Agency affecting the Old Town
Area. ·
C. Counsel. The General Counsel of the Agency shall be the General
Counsel of the Committee.
ARTICLE VI
Meetings
Section 1. Regular Meetings. Meetings shall be held once a month on the first
Tuesday of every month; provided, however, that should such a date be a legal
holiday, the regular meeting shall be held on the next business day which is not a legal
holiday or may be cancelled by resolution of the Committee.
R:\REDEV\OTAC\BYLAW,DFT 11/2195 dwh
Section 2. Quorum. A quorum of three (3) members is required to conduct
a meeting; any meeting failing to achieve a quorum shall be adjourned. A majority
vote of the quorum shall be necessary to pass any resolution of the Committee.
Section 3. Meeting Procedures. The protocol for all meetings shall be
conducted pursuant to the rules of procedure established by the City Council for its
meetings. The Committee shall be subject to and abide by the open meeting
provisions found in the Brown Act (Government Code Sections 54950 e_t seq.),
including those provisions governing the holding of special meetings.
ARTICLE VII
Amendment of Bylaws
The Bylaws of this Committee can be amended by resolution of the agency.
R:~REDEV\OTAC~BYLAW.DFT 11/2/95 dwh
MaD of the Old Town Area
R:\REDEV\OTAC\BYLAW.DFT 11/2/95 dwh
N. SIDE OF 6th
E. ~IDE OF let
W. SIDE OF
Area
ABSC~:!ALTIC~ PRD~ ON WEST S~DE OF C~tt~.
for OTRAC Eligibility
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
R:\REDEV\BYLAWS.RPT 11/2/95 dwh 3
BYLAWS OF THE
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
ARTICLE I
Purpose of the Committee
The Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee ("Committee") shall serve as
the means through which the community can participate with the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") in the planning and implementing of the
Redevelopment Plan ("Plan") for the Old Town portion of the Temecula
Redevelopment Project Area No. 1-1988 ("Old Town Area"). To accomplish this,
the Committee will review, evaluate and submit written reports to the Agency
and/or the City on any and all redevelopment actions proposed to be undertaken by
the Agency and/or the City in furtherance of redevelopment conducted within the
Old Town Area.
ARTICLE II
Creation and Termination of the Committee
The Committee shall be created by resolution of the Agency and shall expire with
the termination of the Plan.
ARTICLE III
Members
Section 1. Membership. The membership of the Committee shall
consist of five (5) members scvcn (7) mcmbcrs, four (q) of whom shnll bc elected
and thrcc (8) of whom shall be appointed, in the manner herein provided and
according to the conditions of eligibility herein provided. Members shall not receive
compensation for their service on the Committee.
Section 2. Eligibility for Membership}.
A. "Eligible person" as used herein shall mean a natural person 18
years or older who resides in the Old Town Area or who works in the Old Town
Area and owns, leases and/or operates a business entity (for profit or not for profit)
which has its principal place of business located within the boundaries of the Old
Town Area. The Old Town Area is delineated on the map attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference.
B. For purposes of 'this section, a "principal place of business" may
be determined with reference to, without limitation, the annual statement of.
R:\REDEV\OTAC~BYLAWDFT.CHG 11/2/95 dwh
general information required to be filed with the Secretary of State by every
corporation pursuant to Corporations Code Section 1502. For purposes of this
section, residency in the Old Town Area may .be determined with reference to,
without limitation, a driver's license, tax or utility bill, or a business license.
C. Failure to abide by the eligibility requirements stated herein shall
be deemed a vacancy subject to the provisions of Section 4 of this Article.
the Committee.
No current member of the Agency shall serve as a member of
Section 3. Membership Terms.
A. Appointed Mcmbcrs. Upcn The ~~ initial crc, Qtion of the
Committee, thrcc digiblc pcrsons shall be appointed mcmbers by the Agency ~
and shall serve at the pleasure of the Agency Board, two of whom shall scrvc for
tcrms of four (4) ycars, and one for a term of two (2) yoorc. At thc cxpiration of
thc initial tcrms, thc Agcncy shall appoint cligiblc persons as suoccssor mcmbers
for terms of four (4) years.
B. Elected Memberc. Upon thc initial creation of thc Committoc, thc
Agcncy shall appoint four cligiblc pcraons to scrvc as mcmbcrs until thc first
clcctcd mcmbcrs takc officc following thc initial election.
Upon thc initial clcction, thc two perconc roooiving thc highcst numbcr of
votcs shall scrvc tcrms of four (4) ycars cach, whilc thc tow pcrsons roociving thc
Iowcst-numbcr of votcs shall-scrvc terms of two (2) ycars each.
At thc conclusion of thc initial tcrmc of officc, pcrcons clcctcd to thc
Committec shall scrvc for tcrms of four (4) ycars.
Section 4. Vacancies. Thc mcmbcrship of any mcmbcr on thc Committec
shall bc vacated whcncvcr' any of thc following occur: Members serve at the
pleasure of the Agency Board and may be removed by the Board for any reason
including, but not limited to:
A. By more than three (3) consecutive unexcused absences from
any of the meetings of the Committee.
B. By death of a member.
C. By resignation of a member.
D. By the failure of the member to maintain eligibility for
membership as specified in Article III, Section 2 herein.
E. If a spccial clection to impcach an clcctcd mcmbcr is ~.,ucccssful whcrc
R:\REDEV\OTAC\BYLAWDFT.CHG 11/2/95 dwh
thc groundc for impoachmcnt arc grosc misconduct; upon thc camc grounds, a
majority of thc Agency my votc to romovc an appointed mornbar. Notioc of a
vacancy shall bc scnt to thc affcctcd mcmbcr and said vacancy may bc appcalcd
by that mcmbcr to thc Agcncy with thc dccision of thc Agency bcing final.
Any vacancy occurring in the membership of the Committee shall be filled by
majority vote of the Agency by an eligible person for the remainder of the
unexpired term of the vacated member as set forth in Article IV.
Sootion ~. Political Reform Act Compliance. All members, whcthcr
appointcd or clocted shall comply with the disclosure and disqualification provisions
of the Political Reform Act (Government Code Section 87100 et seq.).
ARTICLE IV
Procedure for Electing and ADDointing Committee Members
Section 1. Notice Required. Prior to the appointment of any member to
the Committee, the Agency shall advertise, in a public notice, that there is a
vacancy on the Committee and that it intends to appoint qualified individuals to the
Committee. Except, that a vacancy for part of an unexpired term with less than
one year remaining, may be filled by the Agency Board with any eligible person
without the public notice requirement described in Section 2 of this Article.
Section ~-~. Public Notice. "Public Notice" as required herein, shall
mean either or all of the following, as designated herein:
A. Notice sent via first-class United States mail service to all
natural persons who reside within the boundaries of the Old Town Area.
B. Notice delivered to all business entities located within the
boundaries of the Old Town Area.
C. Notice posed at the fire station located within the Old Town
Area, a conspicuous place at Sam Hicks Park, a conspicuous place a~ the location
of the Temecula Community Center and at each lobby or entrance of all multi-
family building in the Old Town Area.
D. Notice published in a paper of general circulation within the Old
Town Area once a week for a period of two weeks.
Scction 2. Initial Mornborchio. Thc Agcncy may makc intcrim
appointmcnts of four (~1) mcmbcrs of thc Redcvclopmcnt Agency 'Committcc until
thc timc of thc first biannual clcctions.
Scotion 3. Proccdurc for Nominating Elcctcd Mcmbcrs. Elections shall bc
hcld biannually on Novcmbcr 1.
R:\REDEV\OTAC\BYLAWDFT.CHG 11/2/95 dwh
--.A. Nomin3tions: Fublic noticc shall bc provided pursuant to Scction
1 (D), (C) and (D) of this Articlc on thc first day of Scptember bcforc thc datc of thc
clcction roqucsting thc submission of thc namc: of cligiblc nominecs. Said notits
shall providc thc location whcrc nomination applications arc availablc and thc final
datc for thcir cubmission. Thc nomination application ~.,hall list thc namc of thc
candidatc, includc an affidavit of cligibility pursuant to Artisis III, Section 2 and
shall contain thc ~ignaturc: of fivc (5) oligiblc persons in order to plaoc thc namc of
thc candidarc on thc ballot.
D. Elcctions: Ballots shall bc mailed by thc 30th day in Soptcmbcr
preceding thc N0vcmbcr 1 olection datc to cvery digiblc pcrson within thc Old
Town Arca. Thc ballots shall includc an affidavit of cligibility and shall stars that
thcy arc to bc rcturned, postmarked not lator than Novornber 1 of thc cloction ycar.
Only onc votc is allowcd pcr cligiblc pcrson. Thc Secrctary will complctc thc ballot
count by Novc-rnbcr 15 of thc clection year and ncw mcmbcrs will bc sworn in at
thc first mccting of thc Committcc in Dcccmber.
ARTICLE V
Internal Organization and Staffing
Section 1. Officers. By majority vote of the members, there shall be
selected one member to act as chairperson and another member to act as vice
chairperson. The term of these offices shall be one year and no member holding
the same office for more than two consecutive terms. Vacancies in any of these
offices shall be filled by majority vote of the membership.
Section 2. Staff
A. Executive Director. The Executive Director of the Agency
shall be the Executive Director of the Committee. The Executive Director's duties
shall include, without limitation, assigning staff to support the Committee, and
making requests to the Agency for additional staffing and/or funds for the
administration of the Committee.
B. Secretary. The Secretary of the Agency shall act as the
Secretary of the Committee. The Secretary's duties shall include, without
limitation, collecting and distributing to each Committee member all non-privileged
material and documentation relating to proposed redevelopment activity by the
Agency affecting the Old Town Area. -
C. Counsel. The General Counsel of the Agency shall be the
General Counsel of the Committee.
ARTICLE VI
Meetings
R:\REDEV\OTAC\BYLAWDFT.CHG 11/2/95 dwh
Section 1. Regular Meetings. Meetings shall be held once a month on the
first Tuesday of every month; provided, however, that should such a date be a
legal holiday, the regular meeting shall be held on the next business day which is
not a legal holiday or may be cancelled by resolution of the Committee.
~!~.ii~i~~ ~~ii A quorum of three (3) four (4) members is required to
conduct a meeting;"'~n'~;"~i'eeting failing to achieve a quorum shall be adjourned. A
majority vote of the quorum shall be necessary to pass any resolution of the
Committee.
Section 3o MeetineJ Procedures. The protocol for all meetings shall be
conducted pursuant to the rules of procedure established by the City Council for its
~~ contninod in thc currcnt odition of Robortc RulcG of Ordcr. The
Committee shall be subject to and abide by the open meeting provisions found in
the Brown Act (Government Code Sections 54950 et seq.), including those
provisions governing the holding of special meetings.
ARTICLE VII
Amendment of ~!~ Rogulations
The ~ii~~ Regulations of this Committee can be amended by resolution of
the Agency.
R:\REDEV\OTAC\BYLAWDFT.CHG 11/2/95 dwh
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
HELD OCTOBER 17, 1995
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 8:13 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 4
ABSENT: 1
BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
BOARD MEMBERS: Parks
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Braldey, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Board Member Stone announced a conflict of interest based on property ownership in Old
Town.
1. Minutes.
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 10, 1995.
It was moved by Board Member Roberrs, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to
approve the minutes of October 10, 1995.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 3 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts
NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Parks
ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone
r:\minutes.fa\101795
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Board Member Roberts, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to
adjourn at 8:14 PM to a meeting on November 14,'1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation
Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously
carried with Board Member Parks absent.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
r:\minutes.fa\l 01795.
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANC~
CITY MANAGER
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENCY REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board Members
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
November 14, 1995
Appraisal of the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority Community
Facilities District
RECOMMENDATION: To approve the attached agreement to secure professional
services for a complete narrative appraisal on the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority
Community Facilities District, No. I and No. 2.
BACKGROUND: On Sept. 12, 1995 the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted a series of resolutions relative to its intention
to establish and to incur bonded indebtedness, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities ACt of 1982..
The Authority formed two separate community facilities districts, Community Facilities District
No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside
Area Public Improvements) (collectively, the "Districts"). The Old Town Area Public
Improvements District was formed for the purpose of financing specific improvements in the
Old Town Area, as referenBed in the Owner Participation Agreement. The other was
established to assure that the Western Bypass improvements will be completed in the event
that the City assessment district referenced in the Owner Participation Agreement cannot, for
any reason, be completed.
An appraisal of the Districts is required to effectively and efficiently market the bonds related
to these financings. The cost of the appraisal is fully reimbursable by TZBG, Inc. pursuant to
the Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement approved by the Authority on September 12, 1995.
Staff is recommending the firm of Brown, Chudleigh, Schuler & Associates to perform the
appraisal under the terms specified in the attached contract in an amount not to exceed
$32,500. This firm is Member Appraisal Institute (M.A.I.) certified and the appraisal document
shall comply with the professional and ethical requirements of the profession.
Again, the full amount of the contract cost for the appraisal services will be reimbursed by
TZBG, Inc. without any cost to the Financing Authority.
FISCAL IMPACT: A deposit for the contract will be required by TZBG, Inc. for all work
performed related to this contract as TZBG, Inc. has agreed to pay all out of pocket expenses
incurred relative to the proposed financingso
Attachment: Appraisal Contract
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
T!:Hg AGREEM~NT, is made and effective as of November 14, 1995,
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Brown, Chudleigh,
Schuler & Associates ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on November 14, 1995 and
shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event
later than March 31, 1996, unless sooner mated pursuant to the provisions of this
Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth
in Exhibit A, attached hereto. and incorporated heroin as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in
Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully,
competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks
described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and
practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of
Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. An initial payment in the mount of $11,000 shall be paid prior to
commencement of the work on the appraisal. City shah notify Consultant in writing if it
wishes Consultant to proceed with additional work on the appraisal beyond that included
within the initial payment. in the event the Consultant is instructed to proceed, a second
payment of $21,500 shall be paid to appraiser upon receipt of the appraisal documents. In
the event the City fails to instruct Consultant to proceed with the additional work within
ninety (90) days from the date of the agreement between the Consultant and the City, then
the agreement shah terminate and the City shall have no further obligations to the Consultant
for the appraisal, beyond the $11,000 initial payment. The total amount of the contract
should not exceed thirty-two thousand five. hundred dollars ($32,500).
b. Consultant shah not be compensated for any services rendered in
connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth
herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City
Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in
the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written
authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager
R: ~rORTONL ~4 GR~PPRBLAGN - 1 ' I1/07/P5
may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the
Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any
additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council.
SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT
CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause,
suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant
at least ten.(10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall
immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If
the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination
shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the
City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of
termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of
the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City
pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this
Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause
under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue
compensating Consultant for any. work performed after the date of default and can terminate
this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the
Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes
beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall
not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve
the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after
service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory
performance. In the event that the Consultant fails w cure its default within such period of
time, the City shall have the fight, notwithstanding any other pwvision of this Agreement, to
terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to
which it may be enti~ed at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records
of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records
shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be
R : ~I OR TO NL L4 GR EMNTS L4P P RSL. A G N -2- 11/07/95
clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant sbnll provide free access to the
representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall
give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make
transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents,
proceexlings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting
documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of
this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files,
surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be
used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable
written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of
accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall
not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a
location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify,
protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and
against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any
kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or
which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property
arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing
to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole
negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REDLrIREMIXrS. Consultant shall procure and
maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or
damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the
work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4)
Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
R : INORTO la, LI lIF, JiINTSMPPRILA GN '3- 11/07/95
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit
is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately
to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be
twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
andproperty damage.
(3)
Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
or disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-
insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of
the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deduetibles or self-insured
retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the
Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations,
claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile
liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to
be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products
and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned,
occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage
shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance .as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect
R : INORTO JVL LI (YRF_.MN~MPPR,VI.,.A GN -4- 11/07/95
coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees
or volunteers.
The Consttltant's insurance shall apply separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except
with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed
to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled
by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return
receipt requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with
a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VH, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with
original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to
be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The
endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received
and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms,
the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance
policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly
independent' contractor. The personnel performing the-services under this Agreement on
behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control.
Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct
of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this
Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability
whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection
with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided
in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services
hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself
informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this
Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and
R:h'VORTOJVT..,MGRF. M. NTSMPPRSI.,.AGN '5- 11/07/~;
regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity
occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement
shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior
written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not
without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City
Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions,
response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this
Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a
subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City
notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promp~y notify City should Consultant, 'its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena,
notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other
discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the
work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the
City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present
at any deposition, heating or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with
City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests
provided by Consultant. However, City's .right to review any such response does not imply
or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the
other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal
service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to,
Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in
the United States Mail, certified mail, pestage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to
the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later
designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecuh
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
Brown, Chudleigh, Schuler, & Associates
745 Cardley Avenue, Suite 100
Medford, Oregon 97504-6124
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of
this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written
consent of the City.
R : ~lOR TO NL tA GREM?tlS~PPRSLA GN -0- 11/07/~
15. LICENSES. At all times during the ten of this Agreement,
Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the
performance of the services described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree
that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and
liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this
Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal,
superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire
understanding between the paxties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this
Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and
statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force
or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations
set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts
such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE TIllS AGREEMENT. The person or
persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or
she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the
authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year furst above written.
CITY OF TF_,MECIH~A
By
Attest:
Jeffrey E. Stone
Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
R : WORTONL ~'i G~F, JlN'FSL4P PRSL A GIV -7- 11/07/~
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
CONSULTANT
By:
By:
R:WORTOtH~AGREMHIS'L4PPR.~r- AGIV -8- 11/07/9~
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
The M.A.I. appraisal report will be furnished to the City in triplicate approximately 45 days
from November 14, 1995 and receipt of all required information and materials from the
These
developer which are considered necessary in order to complete the assignment.
particular items include the following:
Feasibility Study
Site Survey Map
Construction plans and site plans pertaining to the improvements to be developed on-
site
Full narrative metes and bounds legal description of the property
Ti~e Report
Site Acquisition history over the past four years
Improvement construction cost estimate; itemized details should be provided for both
the public and private improvements
Any market information pertaining to the project
R : INOR TONL M GRF. IaI.,N~MPPRI..A GI¢ '9- 11/07/95;
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
OF FINAN E ~,'
DIR. ~
CITY MANAGER
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENCY REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board Members
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
November 14, 1995
Financing for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western
Bypass Corridor
RECOMMENDATION: That the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority open and continue the four (4} Public Hearings listed below:
CFD I Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes
CFD 2 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes
CFD I Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 1
CFD 2 Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 2
DISCUSSION: The Mello-Roos statutes which govern formation and operations of a
Community Facilities District require that the Financing Authority enter into agreements with
any other public agency that will own or operate facilities within the proposed district. Since
the discussions and agreements with Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal
Water District and the Riverside County Flood Control District have not been finalized, staff
recommends the Public Hearing be continued to the meeting of November 28, 1995. At that
time, testimony will be taken from the public as it relates to the formation of the district.
FISCAL iMPACT: None.
R: INORTONL )AGENDASIFAPUBHRG. AGN 11/06/95
AMENDED NOTICE OF FUBLIC HEARING
~ING DATE OF HEARING
Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facih'ties District No. 1
(Old Town Area Public Improvements)
Notice is hereby given that on September 12, 1995, the Board of DirecWrs of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopted a Resolution
entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention To Establish A Community Facilities
District And To Authorize The Levy Of Special Taxes Pursuant To The Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act Of 1982'. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
of 1982 (the 'Act*) the Board of Directors hereby gives notice as follows:
A. The text of said Resolution of Intention is as follows:
WHEREAS, under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended
(the 'Act'), Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title S, commencing at Section 53311, of
the California Government Code, this Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside
Community Facilities District Financing Authori{y (the * Authority') is authorized to establish
a community facilities district and to act as the legislative body for a community facilities
district; and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to proceed with the establishment of
a community facilities district (the 'District') in order to finance costs of public
infrastructure necessary or incident to development in the Old Town area of the City of
Temecula (the 'City').
NOW, TttEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1. This Board of Directon proposes to conduct proceedings to establish a community
facilities district pursuant to the Act.
2. The name proposed for the District is Old Town/W~tside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public
Improvements).
C-10
3. The proposed boundaries of the District arc as shown on the map of the District
on file with the Secretary, which boundnries are hereby preliminarily approved and to which
map reference is hereby made for further particulars. The Secretary is hereby directed to
record, or cause to be recorded, said map of the boundaries of the District in the office of
the County Recorder within fifteen days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, but in any
event at least fifteen days prior to the public heating referred to in paragraph 10 below.
4. The type of public facilities proposed to be financed by the District and pursuant
to the Act shall consist of those items listed as facilities on Exhibit A hereto and by this
reference incorporated herein (the 'Facilities*). The Board of Directors hereby finds and
determines that the public interest will not be served by allowing the property owners in the
District to enter into a contract in accordance with Section 53329.5(a) of the Act.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the District my enter into one or more contracts directly
with any of the proIr. xty owners with respect to the construction of the Facilities.
The Executive Director of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to enter into joint
community facilities agreements with any entity that will own or operate any of the
Facilities, as determined by bond counsel to be necessary to comply with the provisions of
Section 53316.2(a) and Co) of the Act. The Board of Directors of the Authority hereby
declares that such joint agreements will be beneficial to residents in the area of the District.
5. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the District to pay for
the Facilities and/or the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds of the District
issued to acquire the Facilities, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by
recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the District, will be
levied annually within the District, and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorera
property taxes or in such other manner as this Board of Directors or its designee shall
determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The proposed rate and
method of apportionment of the special tax among the 'parcels of real property within the
District and the interests in those parcels, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within
the proposed District to estimate the maximum amount such owner will have to pay, are
described in Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
This Board of Directors hereby finds that the provisions of Section 53313.6, 53313.7 and
53313.9 of the Act (Mating to adjustments to ad valorera property taxes and schools
financed by a community facilities district) are inapplicable to the District.
6. It is the intention of this Board of Directors acting as the legislative body for the
District to cause bonds of the Authority to be issued for the District pursuant to the Act to
finance in whole or in part the Fairies. Said bonds shall be in the aggregate principal
amount of not to exceed $12,500,000, shall bear interest payable semi-annually or in such
other manner as this Board of Directors shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum
C-11
rate of interest as may be authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds, and
shall mature not to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance thereof.
7. The levy of said proposed special lax shah be subject to the approval of the
qualified electors of the District at a special election. The proposed voting procedure shall
be by mailed or hand-delivered ballot among the landowners in said proposed District, with
each owner having one vote for each acre or portion of an acre such owner owns in the
District.
8. Except as may otherwise be provided by law or by the rate and method of
apportionment of the special taxes for the District, all lands owned by any public entity,
including the United States, the. State of California and/or the City, or any depamnents or
political subdivisions thereof, shall be omitted from the levy of the special tax to be made to
cover the costs and expenses of the Facilities and the District. In the event that a portion of
the property within the District shall become for any reason exempt, wholly or in pan, from
the levy of the special tax described in Exhibit B, this Board of Directors will, on behalf of
the District, increase the levy to the extent necesnty upon the rewnining property within the
District which is not exempt in order to yield'the required debt service payments and other
annual expenses of the District, ff any, subject to the pwvi~'ons of the rate and method of
apportionment of the special taxes for the District.
9. The Executive Director of the Authority, as the officer having charge and control
of the Facilities in and for the District, or his designce, is hereby directed to study said
proposed Facilities and to make, or cause to be made, and ~e with the Secretary a report in
writing, presenting the following:
(a) A description of the Facilities by type which will be required to adequately
meet the needs of the District.
(b) An estimate of the fair and reasonable cost of the Facilities including the
cost of acquisition of lands, rights-of-way and easements, any physical facilities required in
conjunction therewith and incidental expenses in'connection therewith, including the costs of
the pwposed bond financing and all other related costs as pwvided in Section 53345.3 of the
Act.
Said report shall be made a pan of the record of the public hearing provided for
below.
10. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in
the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, be, and
the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of
Directors, as legishtive body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the
establishment of the District and consider and finally determine whether the public interest,
C-12
convenience and necessity require the formation of the District and the levy of said special
tax.
11. The Secretary is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be
given by publication one time in a newspaper published in the area of the District. The
publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven days before the date herein set for
said hearing. Said notice shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit C hereto.
1:2. The Authority proposes to repay certain landowners within the District, solely
from the proceeds of bonds of the City and the Authority issued for the District, funds
advanced by such landowners to pay costs of the City and the Authority to form the District.
The procedures for such repayment will be set forth in detail in documents to be approved by
this Board of Directors following the public hearing on the District referred to above.
13. Thc firm of Jones Hall Hill & White, A Professional Law Corporation, is hereby
confirmed as bond counsel for the District and any bonds of the Authority for .the District,
and the firm of Berryman & Henigar is hereby designated as special tax consultant to the
Authority for the District. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to enter
inw contracts with said firms for their services with respect to the District, in form
acceptable to counsel to the Authority and the Executive Director.
B. Thc exhibits to the ResOlution which describe the facilities to bc financed
and the rate and method of .apportionment of the special taxes for the district are on file in
the office of thc 'Secretary of the Authority,
C. The time and place established under said Resolution for the public hearing
required under the Act are Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at the hour of '/:00 p.m. or as
soon as possible thereafter, in the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California.
D. At said hearing, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or
against the establishment of the district, the extent of the district or the furnishing of the
specified typ~ of facilities will be heard. Any person interested may file a protest in writing
as provided in Section 53323 of the Act. If fifty percent or more of the registered voters, or
six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the territory proposed to be included in
the district, or the ownas of one-half or more of the area of land in the terriWry proposed to
be included in the district and not exempt from the special tax, file written protests against
the establishment of the district and the protests are not withdrawn to reduce the value of the
protests to less than a majority, the Board of Directors shall take no further action to create
the district or levy the special taxes for period of one year from the date of decin'on of the
Board of Directors, and ff the majority protests of the registered voters or landowners are
only against the furnishing of a type or types of facilities within the district, or against
C-13
levying a specified special tax, those types of facilities or the specified special tax will be
eliminated from the proceedings to form the district.
E. The proposed voting procedure shall be by special mail or hand-delivered ballot to
the property owners within the territory proposed to be included in the district.
Dated: October 2, 1995
.lt~reek,C~C~C, Aff~~Seeretary/
City Clerk
C-14
AMI~NDED NOTICE OF PUBLIC BT~ARING,
~ING DATE OF FIT~ARING
Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 2
(Westside Area Public Improvements)
Notice is hereby given that on September 12, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopted a Resolution
entitled *A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention To Establish A Community Facilities
District And To Authorize The Levy Of Special Taxes Pursuant To The Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act Of 1982'. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
of 1982 (the 'Act') the Board of Directors hereby gives notice as follows:
A. The text of said Resolution of Intention is as follows:
WHEREAS, under the MeHo-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as mended (the
"Act"), Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Ti~e 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the
California Government Cede, this Board of Directon of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority (the *Authority*) is authorized to establish a community
facilities district and to act as the legislative body for a community facilities district; and
WI-IF~RI~.AS, this Board of Directors now desires to proceed with the establishment of
a community facilities district (the "District") in order to finance costs of public infrastructure
necessary or incident to development in the Westside area of the City of Temecula (the "City").
NOW, THI~E!~ORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Directon of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1. This Board of Directors proposes to conduct proceedings to establish a community
facilities district pursuant to the Act.
2. The name proposed for the District is Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public
Improvements).
3. The proposed boundaries of the District are as shown on the map of the District on
file with the Secretary, which boundaries are hereby preliminarily approved and to which map
reference is hereby made for further particulars. The Secretary is hereby directed to record, or
cause to be recorded, said map of the boundaries of the District in the office of the County
c-8
Recorder within fifteen days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, but in any event at least
fifteen days prior to the public hearing referred to in paragraph 10 below.
4. The type of public facilities proposed to be financed by the Distriot and pursuant to
the Act shall consist of those items listed as facilities on Exhibit A hereto and by this reference
incorporated herein (the *Facilities*). The Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that
the public interest will not be served by allowing the property owners in the District to enter into
a contract in accordance with Section 53329.5(a) of the Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
District may enter into one or more conWacts direc~y with any of the property owners with
r~spect to the construction of the Facilities.
The Executive Director of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to enter into joint
community facilities agreements with any entity that will own or operate any of the
Facilities, as determined by bond counsel to be necessary to comply with the provisions of
Section 53316.2(a) and Co) of the Act. The Board of Directors of the Authority hereby
declares that such joint agreements will be beneficial to residents in the area of the District.
5. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the District to pay for the
Facilities and/or the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds of the District issued to
acquire the Facilities, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by recordatlon of
a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the District, will be levied annually
within the District, and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorera property taxes or
in such other manner as this. Board of Directors or its designee shall determine, including direct
billing of the affected property owners. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the
special tax among the parcels of real property within the District and the interests in those
parcels, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the proposed District to estimate the
maximum amount such owner will have to pay, are described in Exhibit B attached hereto and
by this reference incorporated herein.
This Board of Directors hereby finds that the provisions of Section 53313.6, 53313.7 and
53313.9 of the Act (relating to adjustments to ad valorera property taxes and schools
financed by a community facilities district) are inapplicable to the District.
6. It is the intention of this Board of Directors acting as the legislative body for the
District to cause bonds of the Authority to be issued for the District pursuant to the Act to
finance in whole or in pan the Facilities. Said bonds shall be in the aggregate principal mount
of not to exceed $15,000,000, shall bear interest payable semi-annually or in such other manner
as this Board of Directors shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of interest
as may be authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds, and shall mature not
to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance thereof.
c-9
7. The levy of said proposed tax shall be subject to the approval of the qualified
electors of the District at a special election. The propose~! voting procodure shall be by mailed
or hand-delivered ballot among the landowners in said proposed Disuict, with each owner
having one vote for each acre or portion of an acre such owner owns in the District.
8. Except as may othenvise be provided by law or by the rate and method of
apportionment of the special taxes for the District, all lands owned by any public entity,
including the United States, the State of California and/or the City, or any departments or
political subdivisions thereof, shall be omitted from the levy of the special tax to be made to
cover the costs and expenses of the Facilities and the District. In the event that a portion of the
property within the District shall become for any reason exempt, wholly or in part, from the
levy of the special tax described in Exhibit B, this Board of Directors will, on behalf of the
District, increase the levy to the extent necessary upon the remaining property within the District
which is not exempt in order to yield the required debt service payments and other annual
expenses of the District, if any, subject to the provisions of the rate and method of
apportionment of the special taxes for the District.
9. The Executive Director of the Authority, as the officer having charge and control of
the Facilities in and for the District, or his designee, is hereby directed to study said proposed
Facilities and to make, or cause to be made, and file with the Secretary a report in writing,
presenting the foliowing:
(a) A description of the Facilities by type which will be required to adequately
meet the needs of the District.
Co) An estimate of the fair and reasonable cost of the Facilities including the cost
of acquisition of lands, rights-of-way and easements, any physical facilities required in
conjunction .therewith and incidental expenses in connection therewith, including the costs of the
proposed bond financing and all other related costs as provided in Section 53345.3 of the Act.
Said report shall be made a part of the record of the public hearing provided for below.
10. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, be, and the
same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of
Directors, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the establishment
of the District and consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and
necessity require the formation of the District and the levy of said special tax.
11. The Secretary is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given
by publication one time in a newspaper published in the area of the District. The publication
of said notice shall be completed at least seven days before the date herein set for said hearing.
Said notice shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit C hereto.
C-IO
12. The Authority proposes to repay certain landowners within the District, solely from
the proceeds of bonds of the City and the Authority issued for the District, funds advanced by
such landowners to pay costs of the City and the Authority to form the District. The procedures
for such repayment will be set forth in detail in documents to be appmved by this Board of
Directors following the public hearing on the District referred to above.
13. The firm of Jones Hall Hill & White, A Professional Law Corporation, is hereby
confirmed as bond counsel for the District and any bonds of the Authority for the District, and
the firm of Berryman & Henigar is hereby designated as special tax consultant to the Authority
for the District. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to enter into contracts
with said firms for their services with respect to the District, in form acceptable to counsel to
the Authority and the Executive Director.
B. The exhibits to the Resolution which describe the facilities to be financed and the rate
and method of apportionment of the special taxes for the district are on ~e in the office of the
Secretary of the Authority.
C. The time and place established under said Resolution for the public hearing required
under the Act are Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible
thereafter, in the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California.
D. At said hearing, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or against
the establishment of the district, the extent of the district or the furnishing of the specified types
of facilities will be heard. Any person interested may fie a protest in writing as pwvided in
Section 53323 of the Act. If fifty percent or more of the registered voters, or six registered
voters, whichever is more, residing in the territory proposed to be included in the district, or
the owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory proposed to be included in
the district and not exempt from the special tax, ~e written protests against the establishment
of the district and the protests arc not withdrawn to reduce the value of the protests to less than
a majority, the Board of Directors shall take no further action to create the district or levy the
special taxes for period of one year from the date of decision of the Board of Directors, and ff
the majority protests of the registered voters or landownen are only against the fumishinll of
a type or types of facilities within the district, or against levying a specified special tax, those
types of facilities or the specified special tax will bc eliminated from the proceedings to form
the district.
C-ll
E. The proposed voting procedure shall be by special mail or hand-delivered ballot to
the property owners within the territory proposed to be included in the district.
Dated: October 2, 1995
· Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
ty Seereta~
C-12
AMENDED NOTICE OF PUBLIC I~EARING
~ING DATE OF ~RING
Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 1
(Old Town Area Public Improvements)
Notice is hereby given that on September 12, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopted a Resolution
enti~ed 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention To Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the
Proposed Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community
Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) Pursuant To The Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982". Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
of 1982 (the "Act') the Board of Directors hereby gives notice as follows:
A. The text of said-Resolution is as follows:
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has this date adopted its Resolution entitled "A
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and To
Authoriz~ the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
of 1982", stating its intention to form a community facilities district pursuant to the
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as mended (the *Act'), Chapter 2.5 of Pan
1 of Division 2 of Ti~e 5 of the California Government Code, for the purpose of financing
certain public improvements (the *Facilities*), as further provided in said Resolution; and
WH]EREAS, this Board of Directors estimates the mount required for the financing
of a portion of the costs of the Facilities to be the sum of not to exceed $5,987,000; and
WHEREAS, in order to finance a portion of the costs of said Facilities it is necessary
to incur bonded indebtedness in the mount of not to exceed $12,500,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1. It is necessary to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the
proposed Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community
Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District*) in the
mount of up to $12,500,000 to finance the costs of the Facilities.
2. The bonded indebtedness is proposed to be incurred for the purpose of
l~sos.FA~g5-03 -4-
financing the costs of the Facilities, including acquisition and improvement costs and all costs
incidental to or connected with the accomplishment of said purposes and of the financing
thereof, as permitted by Section 53345.3 of the Act.
3. This Board of Directors, acting as legislative body for the District, intends to
authorize the issuance and sale of bonds in the maximum aggregate principal mount of not
to exceed $12,500,000, bearing interest parable semi-annually or in such other manner as
this Board of Directors shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of interest
as may be authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds, and maturing not
to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance of said bonds.
4. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter,
in the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, Caiifomia, be,
and the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this
Board of Directors, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the
proposed debt issue and consider and finally determine whether the public interest,
convenience and necessity require the issuance of bonds of the Authority for the District.
5. The Secretary is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be
given by publication one time in a newspaper of general circulation circulated within the
District. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven C/) days before the
date herein set for said public hearing. Said notice shall substantially in the form of Exhibit
A hereto.
B. The hearing referred to in the aforesaid Resolution shall be at the time
and place specified in said Resolution.
C. At that time and place the testimony of all. interested persons, including
persons owning property in the area of the i~roposed community facilities district, will be
heard.
Dated: October 2, 1995
'~une S. Gn~,CMC, City Clerk
Agency Secretar
Ruo,.FA~5-0~ -5-
AMENDED NOTICE OF PUBLIC I:!EARING
AME~NDING DATE OF HEARING
Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 2
(Westside Area Public hnpwvements)
Notice is hereby given that on September 12, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopted a Resolution
en~~ed "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention To Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the
Proposed Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community
Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) Pursuant To The Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982". Pursuant W the Mello-Roos Community Facih'ties Act
of 1982 (the "Act") the Board of Directors hereby gives notice as follows:
A. The text of said Resolution is as follows:
WHEREAS, thi.~ Board of Directors has this date adopted its Resolution entitled "A
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and To
Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
of 1982", stating its intention to form a community facilities district pursuant to the
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as mended (the *Act"), Chapter 2.5 of Pan
1 of Division 2 of Ti~e 5 of the California Government Code, for the purpose of financing
certain public improvements (the "Facilities"), as further provided in said Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors estimates the mount required for the financing of
a portion of the costs of the Facilities to be the sum of not to exceed $10,000,000; and
WHEREAS, in order to finance a portion of the costs of said Facilities it is necessary
to incur bonded indebtedness in the mount of not to exceed $15,000,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of DirecWrs of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1. It is necessary to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the proposed
Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities
District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Impwvements) (the *District") in the mount of up to
$15,000,000 to finance the costs of the Facilities.
2. The bonded indebtedness is proposed to be incurred for the purpose of finan~g
P,~sos.FA\95-05
the costs of the Facilities, including acquisition and improvement costs and all costs
incidental to or connected with the accomplishment of said purposes and of the financing
thereof, as permitted by Section 53345.3 of the Act.
3. This Board of Directors, acting as legislative body for the District, intends to
authorize the issuance and sale of bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of not
to exceed $15,000,000, bearing interest payable semi-annually or in such other manner as
this Board of Directors shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of interest
as may be authorized by applicable hw at the time of sale of such bonds, and maturing not
to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance of said bonds.
4. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in
the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, be, and
the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of
Directors, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the proposed
debt issue and consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and
necessity require the issuance of bonds of the Authority for the District.
5. The Secretary is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given
by publication one time in a newspaper of general circulation circulated within the District.
The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven C/) days before the date
herein set for said public hearing. Said notice shall substantially in the form of Exhibit A
hereto.
B. The hearing referred to in the aforesaid Resolution shall be at the time and
place specified in said Resolution.
C. At that time and place the testimony of all interested persons, including
persons owning property in the area of the pioposed community facilities district, will be
heard.
Dated: October 2, 1995
Greek, CMC~ City Clerk,
P~sos.FA~9.e~05 -5-
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY':
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
HELD OCTOBER .17, 1995
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 8:14 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Parks
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Braldey, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Roberts to
adjourn at 8:14 PM to a meeting on November 14, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation
Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously
carried with Board Member Parks absent.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
r:\minutes.otwa~101795 -1-
ITEM 29
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Community Development~:~
November 14, 1995
Planning Application No. PA95-0078, Development Agreement for BCI/CCL
Prepared By:
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration for PA95-0078
2. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND
RESTATEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BCIICCL VENTURE NO. 1
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and BCIICCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, PLANNING AREA
14, MARGARITAVILLAGE, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-
0078.
BACKGROUND:
On November 7, 1988, the County of Riverside approved Development Agreement No. 5 for
the Margarita Village Specific Plan (S.P. 199) which includes Tracts 23100 and 23101. On
September 12, 1995, the City Council and the developer entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) that involved certain portions of Tracts 23100 and 23101 (refer to
Attachment No. 3 for a copy of the MOU Staff Report). This MOU authorizes the collection
of a $3,000.00 per unit Interim Public Facility Fee when the owners obtain a Certificate of
Occupancy for the first production home built in the project. Moreover, the developer has
committed to complete the Recreation Center on or about December 10, 1995.
This Recreation Center has been the center of controversy since the original developer,
Bramalea, did not complete it in a timely manner consistent with their Conditions of Approval.
To insure the completion of the Recreation Center by this date, the developer and staff have
agreed on a construction schedule that ties the completion of the Recreation Center to the
inspections of the production homes. The following two milestones were established:
R:\STAI~'FRPT~78PA95.CC 11/3/95 sn 1
Production home slab pours cannot start until the Tennis Court is poured and framing
inspection is completed on the pool equipment building on or about October 9, 1995.
Framing inspections for production homes cannot start until a final clearance is issued
for the Recreation Center site on or about December 10, 1995.
The first milestone has already been reached and the project is on schedule. For a complete
construction schedule refer to Exhibit E of the Development Agreement. The commitments
in the MOU set the foundation for the Amended and Restatement Development Agreement.
The proposed revisions would reduce the Development Agreement Fee from 85,271.00 per
unit to $3,000.00 per unit which is consistent with the recent reductions the City Council has
approved for other developers. On October 16, 1995 the Planning Commission recommended
approval of PA95-0078 with a 5-0 vote.
FISCAL IMPACT
Development Agreement No. 5 Fee:
Interim Public Facilities Fee to be Collected:
111 Dwelling Units X $5,271 = $585,081
111 Dwelling Units X $3,000 = $333,000
Attachments:
1. Ordinance No. 95- - Blue Page 3 '
2. Proposed Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5 - Blue Page 8
3. City Council .Staff Report for the Memorandum of Understanding, September 12, 1995 -
Blue Page 9
4. Planning Commission Staff Report, October 16, 1995 - Blue Page 10
R:\STAFFRPT~78PA95.CC 11/3/95 sn ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 95-__
R:\STAFFRPT~78PA95.CC 1113/95 sa ~3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEIVIF~NT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 1 LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP and BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, PLANNING
AREA 14, MARGARITA VILLAGE, PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA95-0078.
WHEREAS, Section 65864 et s~. of the Government Code of the State of California
and Temecula City Resolution No. 91-52 authorize the execution of agreements establishing and
maintaining requirements applicable to the development of real property; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedure specified in said Resolution, BCI/CCL
VENTURE NO. 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership, hereinafter "BCI/CCL" has filed with the City
of Temecula an application for a Development Agreement which reflects an amendment and re-
statement of existing County Development Agreement #5 (hereinafter "this Agreement"), of a
residential housing subdivision on its property for Planning Area 14 located at Tracts 23100-1
(8 lots), 23100-2 (15 lots), 23100-3 (28 lots), 23100-4 (23 lots), 23101-2 (28 lots) and 23101-3
(9 lots), hereinafter the "Subject Property" which application has been reviewed and accepted
for filing by the Community Development Director; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the City's intention to consider adoption of this Agreement with
BCI/CCL, has been duly given in the form and manner required by law, and the Planning
Commission and City Council of said City have each conducted public hearings on October 16,
1995 (Planning Commission), and November 14, 1995 (City Council) at which time it heard
and considered all evidence relevant and material to said subject.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. FINDINGS. The City Council hereby finds and determines, with respect
to this Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and BCI/CCL that it:
A. Is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs
specified in the City of Temecula's General Plan in that this Agreement makes reasonable
provision for the use of certain real property for residential development consistent with the
General Plan's land use designation of low-medium density residential;
R:\STAFFRPT~78PAg$.CC 11Bl95 sa
B. Is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the
land use district in which the Subject Property referred to therein is located as this Agreement
provides for residential development pursuant to a Specific Plan;
C. Is in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare, and good land use
practice because it makes reasonable provision for a balance of land uses compatible with the
remainder of the City;
D. Will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare because it
provides adequate assurances for the protection thereof;
E. Notice of the public heaxing before the Planning Commission was published in
a newspaper of general circulation at least twenty (20) days before the Planning Commission
public hearing, and mailed or delivered at least twenty (20) days prior to the hearing to the
project applicant and to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police
protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600')of the
property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll;
F. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission included the date,
time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, a general explanation of
the matter to be considered, a general description in text or by diagram of the location of the
real property that is the subject of the hearing, and of the need to exhaust administrative
remedies;
G. Notice of the public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper
of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the City Council public heating, mailed at
least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to the project applicant, to each agency expected to
provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners
within six hundred feet (600') of the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll;
H. Notice of the City Council hearing included the date, the time, and place of the
public hearing, the identity of. the hearing body, the general explanation of the matter to be
considered, a general description in text or by diagram of the location of the real property that
is the subject of the hearing, and the notice of the need to exhaust administrative remedies;
I. City Council approved this Agreement by Ordinance based upon evidence and
· findings of the Planning Commission and new evidence presented at its hearing on this
Agreement, giving its reasons therefore and set forth their relationship between this Agreement
and the General Plan;
K. The benefits that will accrue to the people of the City of Temecula from this
legislation and this Agreement are as follows:
Generation of municipal revenue;
1. Construction of Public infrastructure facilities;
R:XSTAFFRPTX78PA95.CC 1113195 ~ -5-
2. Acceleration of both the timely development of subject property as well
as the payment of municipal revenue;
3. Enhancement of quality of life for surrounding residents with the timely
development through the elimination of dust and nuisance of partially improved lots;
4. Payment of Public Facility, fire, library, and traffic signal mitigation fees;
and,
5. Early completion of the recreation facility required of the project.
Section 2. APPROVAL. This Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference as Attachment "1" is hereby approved. The Mayor is authorized and directed
to evidence such approval by executing this Agreement for, and in the name of, the City of
Temecula; and the City Clerk is directed to attest thereto; provided, however, that this
Agreement shall not be executed by the City until this Ordinance takes effect and the City has
received from the applicant two executed originals of said Agreement.
Section 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions
of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold
any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. NOTICE OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:\STAFFRPTX78PA95.CC 1 !/3/95 sn
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __
199 .
day of
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the__ day of , 199__, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the day of , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT~7gPA95.CC 11/3/95 sn -7-
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 5
R:~TAFFRPTX78PA95.CC 11/3/95 an -8-
RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF
City Clerk
City of Temecula
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
(Space Above Line For Recorder's Use).
AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199
PLANNING AREA 14
PLANNING 'APPLICATION No. 9443078 and 94-0079
"Margarita Village"
BCI/CCL Venture No. 1 Limited Partnership
BCI/CCL Venture No. 2 Limited Partnership
AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECULA
and
BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
This Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement ("Amendment")is
entered into to be effective on the date set forth in Recital N. and Paragraph 1.7 by and
among the City of Temecula, a California Municipal Corporation ("City") and BCI/CCL
Venture No. 1 Limited Partnership and BCI/CCL Venture No. 2 Limited Partnership, both
California Limited Partnerships (collectively "Owners"):
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864, et. Seq.
("Development Agreement Statutes"), Kaiser Development, a California Corporation and
others and the County of Riverside, California ("County")entered into Development
Agreement No. 5 recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County, California on
November 7, 1988, as Instrument No.325515 ("Development Agreement No. 5").
B. Development Agreement No. 5 encompasses a project formerly located within
County approved Specific Plan No. 199 known as "Margarita Village", a mixed use
subdivision, (the "Original Project") to be developed on property which came within the
municipal boundaries of the City when the City incorporated on December 1, 1989. This
Agreement encompasses only a portion of the Original Project, located in Planning area 14,
Tract Nos. 23100-1 (8 Lots); 23100-2 (15 Lots); 23100-3 (28 Lots); 23100-4 (23 Lots); 23101-
2 (28 Lots); and 23101-3 (9 Lots) for a total of 111 Lots (collectively the "Project"). The
F: \REAL\8z,3\3OO~OO~\DEVE LO~,. AGN
~o/~/~5 1
balance of the Original Project covered by Development Agreement No. 5 not included
within the above referenced Project ("Lots") is not .amended or impacted by this Agreement.
C. Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement Statutes, the City
became the successor-in-interest to the County under Development Agreement No. 5 upon
incorporation of the City.
D. Pursuant to Section 65868 of the Development Agreement Statutes, the City
and Owner propose to restate and amend Development Agreement No. 5 to substitute this
Agreement for the portion of Development Agreement No. 5 pertaining to the Project.
E. Pursuant and subject to the Development Agreement Statutes, the City'spolice
powers and City Resolution No. 91-52, City is authorized to enter into binding agreements
with persons having legal or equitable interest in real property located within the City's
municipal boundaries or sphere of influence thereby establishing the conditions under which
such property may be developed in the City.
F. By electing to enter into this Agreement, City shall bind future Members of
the City Council of City by the obligations specified herein and further limit the future
exercise of certain governmental and proprietary powers of Members of the City Council.
shall bind its successors in interest to the obligations specified in this
Likewise, Owner
Agreement.
G~'
The terms and conditions of this Agreement have undergone extensive review
by the staff of the City, the Planning Commission of the City, and the City Council of City
and have been found to be fair, just, and' reasonable.
H. City finds and determines 'that it will be in the best interest of its citizens and
F: \REAL\843\3006400Z~\DEVELOPz,. AGH
10/04/95 2
the public health, safety and welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement.
I. All of the procedures and requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act have been met with respect to this Agreement.
J. Riverside County Ordinance No. 659, as adopted by the City, establishes
public facilities impact fees for residential development within City CRSA Fees"). City
requires these revenues to mitigate the impact of development. City requires RSA Fees
from development of the Property in order to complete capital proj.ects to mitigate the
impact of the development.
K. Development Agreement No. 5 provided for public facilities and services
impact fees ("County Impact Fees") higher than the RSA Fees. These higher fees,
particularly during the present economic situation, unduly discourage and delay development
and thereby prevent City from ever receiving the County Impact Fees or RSA Fees.
Consequently, the City desires to reduce the County Impact Fees for residential
development in the Project to a level comparable to the RSA Fees.
L. City and Owner acknowledge that development of the Project will result in the
generation of municipal revenue, for public infrastructure facilities and the enhancement of
the quality of life, including recreation facilities for present and future residents of the 'City.
The benefits to the City and Owner contemplated by development of the Project
include:
(1)
(2)
completion of the Recreation Facility required incident to the approval
of the Project;
completion of vacant lots in Project;
F: \REAL \843X300(>GOO4\DEVE LOP4. AGN
10/04/95 3
(3)
(4)
payment of fn'e mitigation fees;
participation in special assessment districts to finance City and regional
infrastructure improvements; and
additional real property tax increment from the completed Project.
(5)
M. The City and Owner knowledge that due to the present economic situation,
none of these benefits to the City are possible unless the Project proceeds with development.
N. City Council of City has approved this Agreement by Ordinance No.
adopted on , and effective on ('Effective Date'). On
the Effective Date, Development Agreement No. 5 shall be terminated as to the Project
only and of no further force and effect with respect to the Project, having been replaced by
this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE in consideration' of the above Recitals and of the mutual
covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and incorporated herein, the parties agree:
1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the
following words and phrases shall have the meaning set forth below:
1.1 'City'is the City of Temeeula.
1.2 'City Public Facility Fee' is an amount to be established by Ordinance
of City.
1.3 'County" is the 'County of Riverside.
1.4 'County Public Facilities and Services Fee' means the County
Development Agreement Fee as set forth in Section 4.2 of Development Agreement No. 5.
F: \REAL \843\]OO6400~\DEVE LOP~,. AGN
10/04/95 4
1.5 "Development Exactions" means any requirement of City in connection
with or pursuant to any I_and Use Regulation or Existing Development Approval for the
dedication of land, the construction of improvements or public facilities, or the payment of
fees in order to lessen, offset, mitigate or compensate for the impacts of development on
the environment or other public interests.
1.6 "Development Plan" means the Existing Development Approvals
defined in Section 1.8 below which are applicable to development of the Project.
1.7 "Effective Date" means the date upon which the Ordinance approving
this Agreement becomes effective, which date is thirty (30) days following the date the City
Council adopted such Ordinance absent a referendum challenge.
1.8 "Existing Development Approval(s)" means those certain development
approvals in effect as of the effective date of this Agreement with restx~t to the Property,
including, without limitation, the Existing Development Approvals" listed in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated
County or the City.
1.9
herein by this reference, which were approved by the
"Financing District" means a Community Facilities District formed
pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, (California Government
Code Section 53311 et se~_. as amended); an assessment district formed pursuant to the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, (California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500
et se~_. as mended); a special assessment district formed pursuant to the Improvement Act
of 1911, (California Streets and Highways Code Section 10102, as amended); or any other
F: \REAL\84v3\30(:)6teOO~e\DEVELOP,~ .AGN
10/0~/95 5
special assessment district existing pursuant to State law formed for the purposes of
financing the cost of public improvements, facilities, services and/or public facilities fees
within a specific geographical area of the City.
1.10 "Interim Public Facilities Fee" means an mount of Three Thousand
Dollars ($3,000) per each residential unit developed'in the Project.
1.11 "Land Use Regulations" means all ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules,
regulations, and official policies of City, governing the development and use of land
including without limitation, the permitted use of land; the density or intensity of use;
subdivision requirements; the maximum height and size of proposed buildings; the provisions
for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes; and the design, improvement, and
construction standards and specifications applicable
listed on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated
to the development of the Property
herein by this reference, which are
a matter of public record on the Effective Date of this Agreement. "Land Use Regulations"
does not include any County or City ordinance, resolution, code, rule, regulation, or official
policy, governing:
(a) The conduct of businesses, professions, and occupations;
Co) Taxes and assessments;
(c) The control and abatement of nuisances'
(d) The granting of encroachment permits and the conveyance of
rights and interests which pwvide for the use of or the entry upon public property;
(e) The exercise of the power of eminent domain.
1.12 "Owner" means the person having a legal or equitable interest in the
F: \REAL \E/,3\3OO(~OO~\DEVELOP/,
10/04/95
Project;
Development
1.13
Plan.
1.14
'Project' is the development of the Property in accordance with the
'Property' is the real property described in Exhibit C, attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference.
1.15 "RSA Fee' means the fee established
as adopted by City.
1.16
by County Ordinance No. 659,
'Subsequent Development Approvals" means all development approvals
required subsequent to the Effective Date in connection with development oft he Property.
1.17 'Subsequent Land Use Regulation' means any Land Use Regulation
adopted and effective after the Effective Date of this Agreement.
2. Interest of Owner. Owner represents that it has the fee ti~e interest in the
Property and that all other persons holding legal or equitable interests in the Property are
to be bound by this Agreement.
3. Exhibits. The following documents are referred to in this Agreement attached
hereto, incorporated herein, and made a part hereof by this reference:
Exhibit Designation
A
B
C
D
Description
Existing Development Approvals
Existing Land Use Regulations
Legal Description of the Property
Notice From Mortgagee
4. Term.
F: \REAL \843\3006~O0/,\DEVE LOP/,. AGIq
10/04/95 7
4.1 The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and
shall extend for a period of ten (10) years thereafter, unless this Agreement is terminated,
modified or extended by circumstances set forth in this Agreement or by mutual consent of
the parties hereto.
4.2 This Agreement shall terminate and be of no force and effect upon the
occurrence of the entry of a final judgment or issuance of a final order after exhaustion of
any appeals directed against the City as a result of any lawsuit filed against the City to set
aside, withdraw, or abrogate the approval by the City Council of City of this Agreement.
5. Assignment.
5.1 Right to Assign. The Owner shall have the fight to sell, transfer, or
assign the Property in whole or in part (provided that no such partial transfer shall violate
the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq.. or Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460, as the same was incorporated by reference into the Temecula Municipal
Code by Ordinance No. 90 04,) to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm, or
corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement; provided, however, that any such
sale, transfer, or assignment shall include the assignment and assumption of the rights,
duties, and obligations arising under or from this Agreement and be made in strict
compliance with the following conditions precedent:
(a) No sale, transfer, or assignment of any fight or interest under
this Agreement shall be made unless made together with the sale, transfer, or
assignment of all or a part of the Property. Owner agrees to provide specific notice
of this Agreement (which may be by specific exception listed in a Preliminary Title
F: \REAL\SZe3\30064004\DEVELOP4. AGN
10/04/95 8
Report or Title Insurance Policy), including the record or document number, where
a true and correct copy of this Agreement may be obtained from the Riverside
County Recorder.
(b) Concurrent with any such sale, transfer, or assignment, or within
fifteen (15) business days thereafter, the Owner shall notify City, in writing, of such
sale, transfer, or assignment and shall provide City with an executed agreement, in
a form reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney, by the purchaser, transferee, or
assignee and providing therein that the purchaser, transferee, or assignee expressly
and unconditionally assumes an the duties and obligations of the owner under this
Agreement.
Any sale, transfer, or assignment not made in strict compliance with the foregoing conditions
shall constituted a default by the Owner under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the failure
of any purchaser, transferee, or assignee to execute the agreement required by Paragraph
(b) of this Subsection, the burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon such purchaser,
transferee, or assignee, but the benefits of this Agreement shall not inure to such purchaser,
transferee, or assignee until and unless such agreement is executed.
5.2 Release. of Transferring Owner. Notwithstanding any sale, transfer, or
assignment, a transferring Owner shall continue to be obligated under this Agreement unless
such transferring Owner is given a release in writing by City, which release shall be provided
by City upon the full satisfaction by such transferring Owner of ALL of the following
conditions:
(a)
The Owner-no longer has a legal interest in an or any
F: \REAL\843\3006400,G\DEVELOP/, .AGN
10/OZ,/~5 C)
part of the Property except as a beneficiary under a deed of trust.
Co) The Owner is not then in default under this Agreement.
(c) The Owner or purchaser has provided City with the notice and
executed agreement required under Paragraph (b) of Subsection 5.1 above.
(d) The purchaser, transferee, or assignee provides City with security
equivalent to any security previously provided
obligations hereunder.
by Owner to secure performance of its
(e) The Owner has reimbursed City for any and all City costs
associated with Owner's transfer of all or a portion of the Property.
5.3 Termination of At, reement with Respect to Individual Lots upon Sale
to Public and Completion of Construction. The provisions of Subsection 5.1 shall not apply
to the sale or lease (for a period longer than one year) of any lot which has been finally
subdivided and is individually (and not in 'bulk") sold or leased to a member of the public
or other ultimate user. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, this
Agreement shall terminate with respect to any lot and such lot shall be released and no
longer be subject to this Agreement without the execution or recordation of any further
document upon satisfaction of both of the following conditions:
(a) The lot has been finally subdivided and individually (and not in
"bulkD sold or leased (for a period longer than one year) to a member of the public
or other ultimate user; and
Co) A Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for a building on a
lot, and the fees set forth in this Agreement have been paid.
F: \REAL\Eze3\300640G4\DEVELOP4. AGfe
10/0~/95 lO
5.4 Subsequent Assignment. Any subsequent sale, transfer, or assignment
after an initial sale, transfer, or assignment shall be made only in accordance with and
subject to the terms and conditions of this Section.
6. Mortgagee Protection. The parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not
prevent or limit Owner, in any manner, at Owner's sole discretion, from encumbering the
Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust,
or other security device securing financing with respect to the Property. City acknowledges
that the lenders providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and
modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with the Owner and
representatives of such lenders to negotiate in good faith any such request for in. terpretation
or modification. City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested
interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with
the intent and purposes of this Agreement~ Owner shall reimburse City for any and all of
City's reasonable costs associated with said negotiations, interpretations, and modifications
and shall make reimbursement payments to City within thirty (30) days or receipt of an
invoice from City.
Any Mortgagee of the Property shall be entitled to the following fights and privileges:
(a) Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement
shall defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of any mortgage on the Property
made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law.
Co) The Mortgagee of'any mortgage or deed of trust encumbering the
Property, or any part thereof, which Mortgagee has submitted a request in writing, in the
F: \REAL\8~3\30064004 \DEVELOPs, .AG/R
10/04/~5 ] l
form as attached hereto as Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference, to the City in the manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to
receive written notification from City of any default by the Owner in the performance of the
Owner's obligations under this Agreement.
(c) If City timely receives a request from a Mortgagee, in the form set forth
on Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, requesting a copy
of any notice of default given to the Owner under the terms of this Agreement, City shall
endeavor to provide a copy of that notice of default to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days
of sending the notice of default to the Owner. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not
the obligation, to cure the default during the remaining cure period allowed such party
under this Agreement.
(d) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property, or any pan
thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage ..or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of such
foreclosure, shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement.
Notwithstanding any Other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, no Mortgagee shall
have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform any of the Owner's obligations
or other affirmative covenants of the Owner hereunder, or to guarantee such performance,
provided however, that to the extent that any covenant to be performed by Owner is a
condition precedent to the performance of a covenant by City, the performance thereof shall
continue to be a condition precedent to City'spefformance hereunder, and further provided
that any sale, transfer, or assignment by any Mortgagee in possession shall be subject to the
provisions of Section 5.1 of this Agreement. The term of the Agreement shall not be
F: \REAL \843\300~O04\DEVELOP~. AG/4
10/04/~5 12
extended based on the fact that a Mortgagee holds title to the Property for an or any part
of the term of this Agreement.
(e)
portion thereof,
obligations of the Owner set forth herein shall not be entitled to any rights to develop which
have or may have vested as a result of this Agreement.
Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property, or any
pursuant to subsection (d) above and who elects not to assume the
7. Binding Effect of Agreement. The burdens of this Agreement bind and the
benefits of the Agreement inure to the successors-in-interest to the parties to it in
with the provisions of and subject to the limitations of this Agreement.
PrOject as a Private Undertaking/Relationsh~
and agreed by and between the parties hereto
of Parties. It is specifically
that the development of the
accordance
8.
understood
No partnership, joint
The only relationship
the development of
Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in any
respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting entity with respect to
the terms, covenants, and conditions contained in this Agreement.
venture, or other association of any kind is formed by this Agreement.
between City and Owner is that of a government entity regulating
private property and the owner of such property.
9. Changes in Project. No material change, modification, revision, or alteration
of Existing Development Approvals may be made without the prior approval by those
agencies of the City equivalent to the County agencies that approved the Existing
Development Approvals in the tirst instance (if the County had granted the approvals) or
by the same City agency that granted-the Existing Development Approvals, (if the City
F: \REAL \8,4,3\300~004~\DEVE LOPZ>. AGN
101041~5 ] 3
granted the approval in connection with the adoption of this Agreement). City may expand
the permitted uses for the Property without amending this Agreement so long as Owner or
Owner's successor retains his/her/their existing entitlements.
10. Timing of Development. The parties acknowledge that Owner cannot at this
time predict when, or at the rate at which the Property will be developed. Such decisions
depend upon numerous factors which are not within the control of Owner, such as market
orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, completion and other similar factors.
Since the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo,
37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that the failure of the parties therein to provide for the timing of
development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development
resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over
such parties, it is the parties intent to cure that deficiency by acknowledging and providing
that the Owner shall have the right to develop the Property in such order, at such rate, and
at such times as the Owner deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business
judgment, subject only to any timing or phasing requirements specifically set forth in the
Development Plan.
11. Indemnity and 'Cost of Litigation.
11.1 Hold Harmless. Owner agrees to and shall hold City, its officers, employees,
agents, and representatives harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for
personal injury including death and claims for property damage which may arise from the
direct or indirect operations of the Owner or those of its contractor, subcontractor,
employee, agents, or other person acting on its behalf which relate to the Project (excluding
F: \REAL \843 \300(:~O(:)~\DEVE LOP4 .AGH
1 O/Oz,/~5 ] 4
actions by any party not related to Owner or authorized to act for Owner). Owner agrees
to and shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officers,
employees, agents, and representatives from actions for damages caused or alleged to have
been suffered by reason of the operations referred to in this paragraph, regardless of
whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved plans or specifications for the Project.
This indemnification requirement shall extend beyond the termination or expiration of this
Agreement. There are no intended or incidental third party beneficiaries to Owners
obligations under this paragraph 11.1.
11.2 Count.v Litigation Concerning Agreement. In the event the County
seeks to challenge the right of City and Owner to enter into this Agreement or to terminate
Development Agreement No. 5, and institutes an action, suit, or proceeding to challenge this
Agreement or invalidate and/or enjoin the enforcement of this Agreement or the
amendment of Development Agreement No. 5, City and Owner agree to cooperate and
participate in a joint defense in any action against 'the parties, their officers, employees, and
agents, from and against any and all such obligations, liability, suit, claim, loss, judgment,
or lien resulting from such action(s) brought by County, (but excluding actions to expunge
any lis pendens) and to share the costs associated with attorneys fees and costs that the
parties may incur as the result of any such action or lawsuit to challenge City and/or
Owner's legal authority to enter into this Agreement and/or terminate Development
Agreement No. 5. If the County action is against all impacted developments for which the
City has lowered the otherwise applicable County fees, then Owner's defense costs herein
shall be its pro rata share among all impacted landowners based on a faction, the numerator
F: \REAL \8,G3\3OO6~OG6\DEVE LOf>4. AGN
10/06/95 ] 5
of which is the total units owned by Owner which are subject to this Memorandum and the
denominator is the total number of units within the City in which the City has lowered the
County Fees. If the County action is only against Owner with respect to this Agreement or
the amendment to County Development Agreement No. 5, then Owner's defense costs shall
be one-hundred percent (100%) of the attorneys fees and costs for defense of the litigation.
Damages "(including the difference in the amount of any Interim Public Facilities Fee and
the amount of the County Development Agreement Fee paid by Owner to City pursuant to
the tens of this AgreemenO shall be the responsibility of Owner. To the extent Owner has
paid Public Facilities Fees and/or County Development Agreement Fees to City of which
it is adjudicated Coy final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction) are lawfully the
funds of County, City shall pay such sums to County and Owner shall have such liability for
the payment of the difference between such fees reduced by the amount paid by the City.
City and Owner shall mutually agree on legal counsel to be retained to defend any such
action(s) brought by the County as herein provided. City and Owner each reserve the right
to withdraw from the defense of the County litigation in the event the County prevails at
the trial level and there is an appeal. If either party withdraws after the trial and there is
an appeal, the remaining party shall pay all the costs and fees associated with said appeal.
11.3 Public Facilities Fees Shortfall. In the event the County prevails in any
legal action or other proceeding to challenge, set aside, or enjoin the enforcement of this
Agreement and the amendment of Development Agreement No. 5, and a trial court
determines by final judgment or order that the Owner and/or the City is liable to make up
any shortfall between the amount of the Interim Public Facilities Fee or the City Public
F: \REAL \843'%,3006~O0/,\DEVELOP~,. AGN
10/04/95 ] 6
Facilities Fee, as the case may be, and the County Development
would otherwise have been
Owner shall be responsible
County of any amounts
Agreement Fee which
imposed pursuant to Development Agreement No. 5, then
for paying any such shortfall subject to City's payment to
collected and held by City under the terms of Development
Agreement No. 5 -- in excess of that due City under Development Agreement No. 5. Such
payment by City and County shall reduce Owner's liability to County for payment of such
fees by a like amount paid by City.
11.4 County Prevails in Litigation - Severability. In the event the County
prevails at the trial court level against the City or the Owner as described in Section 11.2
of this Agreement, the amount of the Interim Public Facilities Fee or the City Public
Facilities Fee, as the case may be, shall revert to the amount of the County Development
Agreement Fee in effect at the time of entry of the final judgment in favor of the County,
or such lesser amount as determined by' the court. In the event this Agreement is held to
be invalid or unenforceable by a trial court of competent jurisdiction, the provisions set forth
in Sections 12.2 and 12.3 of this Agreement shall no longer be enforceable and from the
date of said final judgment or ruling of invalidity, Owner shall thereafter pay the County
Development Agreement Fee as provided in Section 4.2 of Development Agreement No.
5, or such lesser amount as determined by the court. AU other provisions of this
Agreement shall remain valid and enforceable notwithstanding said ruling of invalidity.
11.5 Third Party Litigation Concerning Agreement. Owner shall indemnify;
protect; defend, at its expense--including attorney's fees; and hold harmless City, its officers,
employees, or agents against any loss, cost, expense, claim, or counter-claim, complaint, or
F: \REAL \8,~3\3OO&~OO~\DEVE LOP,~ .AGN
10/04/9~ 17
proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Agreement or the
approval of any permit granted pursuant to this Agreement brought by a third party other
than the County, which claim is based upon this Amendment. City shall promptly notify
Owner of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and City shall cooperate in the defense.
If City fails to promptly notify Owner of any such claim, action, or proceeding, or if City falls
to cooperate in the defense, Owner shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify,
or hold harmless City. City may in its discretion
claim, action, or proceeding.
11.6 Environmental Assurances.
participate in the defense of any such
Owner shall indemnify, protect, defend
with counsel approved by City, and hold harmless City, its officers, employees, agents,
assigns, and any successor or successors to City's interest from and against all claims, actual
damages (including but not limited to special and consequential damages), natural resources
damages, punitive damages, injuries, costs, response remediation and removal costs, losses,
demands, debts, liens, liabilities, causes of action, suits, legal or administrative proceedings,
interest, fines, charges, penalties and expenses (inclUding but not limited to attorneys' and
expert witness fees and costs incurred in connection with defending against any of the
foregoing or in enforcing this indemnity) of any kind whatsoever paid, incurred, or suffered
by, or 'asserted against, City or its officers, employees, or agents arising from or attributable
to any repair, cleanup, or detoxi~cation, or preparation and implementation of any removal
remedial, response, closure, or other plan (regardless of whether undertaken due to
governmental action) concerning any Hazardous Substance or hazardous wastes at any place
within the Property which is the subject of this Agreement. The foregoing indemnity
F: \REAL \8~3\3OO6~.OO4, U)EVE LOP/, .AGH
10/04,/95 ] 8
extends beyond the term of this Agreement and is intended to operate as an agreement
pursuant to Section 107(e) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act, "CERCLA," 42 U.S.C. Section 9667(e), and California Health and Safety
Code Section 25364, and their successor statutes, to insure, protect, hold harmless, and
indemnify City from liability.
11.7
specific performance
Release. Except for nondamage remedies, including the remedy of
and judicial review as provided for in Sections 19, 20, and 21 hereof,
City, for itself, its successors and assignees, hereby releases the City, its officers, agents, and
employees from any and all claims, demands, actions, or suits of any kind or nature arising
out of any liability, known or unknown, present or future, including, but not limited to, any
claim or liability, based or asserted, pursuant to Article I, Section 19 of the California
Constitution, the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, or any other law or
ordinance which seeks to impose any other liability or damage, whatsoever, upon the City
because it entered into this Agreement or because of the terms of this Agreement.
11.8 Reservation of Rights. With respect to Sections 11.1 to 11.7 herein,
City reserves the right to either (1) approve the attorney(s) which Owner selects, hires, or
otherwise engages to defend City hereunder, which approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld, or (2) conduct its own defense, provided, however, that Owner shall reimburse
City forthwith for any and all reasonable expenses incurred for such defense, including
attorney's fees, upon billing and accounting therefor.
11.9 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11.1 to 11.9, inclusive, shall
survive the termination of this Agreement.
F: \REAL \BZ~3\3OO6ZeOO,G\DEVELOP~. AGN
10104195 19
12. Public Benefits. Public Improvements and Facilities.
12.1 Intent. The parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement confers
private benefits on the Owner which should be balanced by commensurate public benefits.
Accordingly, the parties intend to provide consideration to the public to balance the private
benefits conferred on the Owner by providing more fully for the satisfaction of the public
needs resulting from development of the Project.
12.2 Public Facilities Fee (Residential): Other Public Benefits.
(a) In Lieu of the County Development Agreement Fee, RSA Fee
or City Public Facility Fee, for a period of five (5) years commencing on the Effective Date,
Owner shall pay an Interim Public Facilities Fee of Three Thousand Dollars ($3 ,000.00) per
dwelling unit. The Interim Public Facilities Fee shall be paid as provided in Section 12.5
below. At the conclusion of the five (5) year period, Owner shall either continue to pay the
Interim Public Facilities Fee of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00)per dwelling unit or
such other public facilities fee as the City has then enacted and applied to residential
development projects in the City. Owner expressly acknowledges the existence and holding
in the case of Kaufman and Broad Central Valley. Inc. v. City of Modesto, (1994), 25
Cal. App.4th 1577, as it applies to later adopted fees. Owner hereby waives for himself, and
for any successor thereto, the right to challenge the validity or amount of any such other
public facilities fees which are enacted and applied to residential development projects in
the City. Such waiver applies to the Project after the tirst five (5) years of this Agreement.
Owner acknowledges and agrees that City would not have entered into this Agreement if
its application or operation would limit in any way the City's ability to develop and apply
F: \REAL \843\3006/,OO/e\DEVE LOP~.. AGIR
10/0z,/95 20
a Comprehensive Public Facilities Fee Program to this Project following the first five (5)
years of the term of this Agreement. Owner further acknowledges and agrees that the
waiver provided herein applies not only to this Agreement, but to any rights Owner ma3j
have under any vesting map filed and deemed complete under the vesting maps statutes,
Government Code Section 66498.1 et seq. Finally, Owner agrees that the institution of any
legal action by Owner, or any successor thereof, to challenge the validity, amount, or
application of any public facilities fee after the first five (5) years of this Agreement,
including paying such fees "under protest" pursuant to Government Code Section 66020 et
seq., shall constitute a material breach and default under this Agreement entitling the City
to summary termination thereof.
(b) Owner shall also pay all other lawful customary and typical
development exactions, for a Project of this size and nature, in existence as of the Effective
Date and throughout the term of this Agreement, including but not limited to, Fire, Traffic
Signal Mitigation, and K-Rat Fees pursuant to the provisions of City ordinances and
resolutions' in the existence when paid.
(c) Owners shall provide the public benefits stated in Recital L.
hereof, which are incorporat~ herein and made a part hereof. As to the Recreation
Center, Owner shall be subject to the performance schedule set forth on Exhibit E, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
12.3 Timing. Collection of any and all Interim Public Facilities Fees and/or
City Public Facilities Fees, if any, required to be paid by Owner pursuant to this Agreement
shall be deferred until such time as a certificate of occupancy has been obtained for the first
F: \REAL\843\3006~OO4\DEVELOP4. AGIq
10/04/95 2 ]
production home built on the Property. Thereafter, the Interim Public Facilities Fees shall
be paid at the time of issuance of building permits for each residential unit constructed on
the Property. Collection of any and all Interim Public Facilities Fees and/or City Public
Facilities Fees paid by the Owner for the model home units in surplus to those fees
contained herein shall be credited to Owner.
12.4 Other Applicable Fees. The parties hereto agree that to the extent the
fees set forth below have not ben paid prior to the execution of this Agreement by both
parties, the Stevens Kangaroo Rat, library, fire, drainage, and traffic signal mitigation fees
remain applicable to the Project. In the event City establishes a permanent public facility
fee program which is specifically designed to include one or more of the fees listed above,
Owner, or Owner's successor, shall not be obligated to pay such fee or applicable part
thereof more than once.
be applicable
construction.
13.
12.5 Public Works. If Owner is required by this Agreement, or any other
obligation~ to construct any public works facilities which will be dedicated to City or any
other public agency upon completion, and if required by applicable laws to do so, Owner
shall perform such work in the same manner and subject to the same requirements as would
to City or such other public agency should it have undertaken such
Reservation of Authority.
13.1 Limitations. Reservations. and Exceptions. Notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, the following Subsequent Land Use Regulations shall apply to
F: \REAL\8~3\3OO(~OO~\DEVELO~,. AGN
10/0~/9S 22
the development of the Property:
(a) Processing fees and charges imposed by City to cover the
estimated actual costs to City of processing applications for Subsequent Development
Approvals.
Co) Procedural regulations relating to hearing bodies, petitions,
applications, notices, findings, records, hearings, reports, recommendations, appeals, and any
other matter of procedure.
(c) RegulationS' imposing Development Exactions; provided,
however, that no such subsequently adopted Development Exactions shall be applicable to
development of the Property. unless such Development Exactions are applied uniformly to
development throughout the City. No such subsequently adopted Development Exaction
shall apply if its application to the Property would physically prevent development of the
Property for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in the
Development Plan. In the event any such subsequently adopted Development Exaction
fulfills the same purposes, in whole or in pan, as the fees set forth in this Agreement, City
shall allow a credit against such subsequently adopted Development Exaction for the fees
paid under this Agreement to the extent such fees fulfill the same purposes.
(d) Regulations governing construction standards and specifications
including without limitation, the City's Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code,
Electrical Code, and Fire Code.
(e) Regulations which are in conflict with the Development Plan.
Any regulation, whether adopted by initiative or otherwise, limiting the rate or dining of
F: \REAL\843\300~OO4\DEVELOP/, .AGH
10/04/~5 23
development of the Property shall be deemed to conflict with the Development Plan and
shall therefore not be applicable to the development of the Property.
(f) Regulations which are in conflict with the Development Plan
provided Owner has given written consent to the application of such regulations to
development of the Property.
13.2 Subsequent Development Approvals. This Agreement shall not prevent
City, in acting on Subsequent Development Approvals, from applying the Subsequent Land
Use Regulations which do not conflict with the Development Plan, nor shall this Agreement
prevent City from denying or conditionally approving any Subsequent Development
Approval on the basis of the Existing or Subsequent Land Use Regulations not in conflict
with the Development Plan.
13.3 Modification or Suspension by State or Federal Law. In the event that
State or Federal laws or regulations enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement
prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, such
provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply
with such State or Federal laws or regulations, provided, however, that this Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with constitutional
provisions preventing application of such law or regulation, such laws or'
regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such remaining
provisions impractical to enforce.
13.4 Regulation by Other Public Agencies. It is acknowledged by the parties
that other public agencies not within the-control of City possess authority to regulate aspects
F: \REAL \8~3\300(~O04\DEVELOP/e. AGN
10/04/~5 24
of the development of the Property separately from or jointly with City and this Agreement
does not limit the authority of such other public agencies.
13.5 Tentative Tract Map F. xtension. Pursuant to the provisions of Sectior~
66452.6 of the Government Code, the tentative subdivision map(s) or tentative parcel
map(s) (vested or regular) approved as a part of implementing the Development Plan shall
be extended to expire at the end of the term of this Agreement.
13.6 Vesting Tentative Maps. If any tentative or final subdivision map, or
tentative or final parcel map, heretofore or hereafter approved in-connection with the
development of the Property, is a vesting map under the Subdivision Map Act (Government
Code Section 66410, et seq,)and Riverside County Ordinance No. 460, as the same were
incorporated by reference into the Temecula Municipal code by Ordinance No. 90-04, and
if this Agreement is determined by a final judgment to be invalid or unenforceable insofar
as it grants a vested right to develop to the Owner, then and to that extent the rights,
obligations, and protection afforded the Owner and City respectively, under the laws
and-ordinances applicable to vesting maps shall supersede provisions of this Agreement.
Except as set forth immediately above, development of the Property shall occur only as
provided in this Agreement, and the provisions in this Agreement shall be controlling over
conflicting provisions of law or ordinances concerning vesting maps.
14. Development of the Property. Vesting. Termination of Development
Agreement No. 5.
14.1 Rights to Develop.- Subject to the terms of this Agreement, including
F: \REAL\8~3\3OO&/,OO/,\DEVELOP~ .AGN
10/0~/~ 25
payment of the Interim Public Facilities Fee, the Owner shall have a vested right to develop
the Property in accordance with, and to the extent of the Development Plan. The Project
shall remain subject to all Subsequent Development
Project as contemplated by the Development Plan.
Approvals required to complete the
Except as otherwise provided in this
Agreement, the permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use, the
maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation and
dedication of land for public purposes shall be those set forth in the Development Plan. In
exchange for the vested right to develop. pursuant to this Agreement, Owner expressly waives
for himself and for any successor thereto, the right to challenge or contest the validity of any
condition of approval attached to any entitlement which is a part of the Development Plan.
14.2 Effect of Agreement on Land Use Regulations. Except as otherwise
provided under the terms of this Agreement, including the payment of the Interim Public
Facilities Fee, the rules, regulations, and official policies governing permitted uses of the
Property, the density and intensity of use of the Property, the maximum height and size of
proposed buildings, and the design,
specifications applicable to development
improvement and construction standards and
of the Property shall be the Existing Land Use
Regulations. City shall exercise its lawful reasonable discretion in connection with
Subsequent Development Approvals in accordance with the Development Plan, and as
provided ~by this Agreement including, but not limited to, payment of the Interim Public
Facilities Fee and/or the City Public Facilities Fee, as the case may be. City shall accept
for processing, review, and action all applications for Subsequent Development Approvals,
and such applications shall be processed- in the normal manner for processing such matters.
F: \REAL \8~.3\3006600,4.\DEVELOP,6 .AGN
10/01,/95 26
City may, at the request of Owner, contract for planning and engineering consultant services
to expedite the review and. processing of Subsequent Development Approvals, the cost of
which shall be borne by Owner.
14.3 Chant, es and Amendments. The parties acknowledge that refinement
and further development of the Project will require Subsequent Development Approvals and
may demonstrate that changes are appropriate and mutually desirable in the Existing
Development Approvals. In 'the event the Owner finds that a change in the Existing
Development Approvals is necessary or appropriate, the Owner shall apply for a Subsequent
Development Approval to effectuate such change. If approved, any such change in the
Existing Development Approvals shall
Agreement and may be further changed
be incorporated herein as addendure to this
from time to time as provided in this Section.
Owner, shall, within thirty (30) days of written demand by City, reimburse City for any and
all reasonable costs, associated with any amendment or change to this Agreement that is
initiated by Owner or Owner's successor -- without regard to the outcome of the request for
amendment or change to this Agreement. Unless otherwise required by law, as determined
in City's reasonable discretion, a change to the Existing Development Approvals shall be
deemed "minor" and not require an amendment
does not:
to this Agreement provided such change
(a)
Alter the permitted uses of the Property as a whole, except as provided
in Section 9 hereof; or,
(b) Increase the density or intensity of use of the Property as a whole; or,
(c) Increase the maximum height and size of permitted buildings; or,
F: \REAL\SA3\3OO6~O(Y,\DEVELOPZ~ .Ag4
10/0~/95 27
(d)
public purposes within the Property as a whole; or,
(e) Constitute a project requiring a subsequent or a supplemental
Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code.
14.4 Minimum Unit Size. Owner agrees that the units to be constructed on
the Property shall be a minimum of one thousand (1,000) square feet in size.
14.5 Termination of Development Agreement No. 5. Both City and Owner
agree that on the Effective Date of this Agreement, Development Agreement No. S shall
be terminated and of no further force or effect as to this Project only, having been replaced
by this Agreement.
15. Periodic Review of Compliance with Agreement.
(a) Pursuant to City Resolution No. 91-52, as it may be subsequently
amended, City shall review this Agreement at least once during every twelve (12) month
period from the Effective Date of this Agreement. The Owner or successor shall reimburse
City for the reasonable and necessary costs of this review, within thirty (30) days of written
demand from City.
(b) During each periodic review by City, the Owner is required to
demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement. The Owner agrees
to furnish such evidence of good faith compliance as City in the exercise of its discretion
may require.
16. Financing District. Upon the request of Owner, the parties shall cooperate
in exploring the use of special assessment districts and other similar Financing Districts for
Delete a requirement for the reservation or dedication of land for
F: \REAL \Si,3\3OO6~OO~e\DEVELOPZ, .Age
10/GG/95 28
the financing of the construction, improvement, or acquisition of public infrastructure,
facilities, lands, and improvements to serve the Project and its residents, whether located
within or outside the Property. It is acknowledged that nothing contained in this Agreement
shall be construed as requiring City or City Council to form such a district or to issue or sell
bonds.
17.
or canceled
Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended
in whole or in part only by mutual consent of the parties and in the manner
provided for in Government Code Sections 65868, 65867 and 65867.5. If an Amendment
is requested by the Owner or its successor, the Owner/successor agrees to pay City any
Development Agreement Amendment fee then in existence as established by City Council
Resolution, or if no such fee is established, to reimburse City for the actual and reasonably
necessary costs of reviewing and processing said Amendment within thirty (30) days of
written demand from City--without regard to City's action on such amendment.
18. Enforcement. Unless amended-or canceled as herein provided, this
Agreement is enforceable by any party to it notwithstanding a change in the applicable
general or specific plan, zoning, subdivision, or building regulations adopted by the City
which alter or amend the rules, regulations, or policies governing permitted uses of the land,
density, design, improvement, and construction standards and specifications.
19. Events of Default. Owner is in default under this Agreement upon the
happening of one or more of the following events or conditions:
(a) If a warranty, representation, or statement made or furnished by Owner
to City is false or proves to have been false in any material respect when it was made;
F: \REAL\8Z,3\30064004\DEVELOP,~. AGN
10/0,,/. 29
(b)
written request to Owner for payment or reimbursement
agreed to pursuant to this Agreement.
(c) A finding and determination
evidence the Owner has not complied in good faith
conditions of this Agreement.
20. Procedure Upon' Default.
More than forty-five (45) days have passed since City's making of a
for a fee or service authorized or
by City that upon the basis of substantial
with one or more of the terms or
(a) Upon the occurrence of an event of default, City may terminate or
modify this Agreement in accordance with the procedure adopted by the City.
Co) City does not waive any claim of defect in performance by Owner
if on periodic review the City does not propose to modify or terminate this
(c) Non-performance shall not be excused because of a failure of a third
implied
Agreement.
person.
(d) Non-performance shall be excused only when it is prevented or delayed
by acts of God or an emergency declared by Governor.
(e) All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided
for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing development' agreements are
available to the parties to pursue in the event there is a breach.
21. Damages Upon Termination. It is acknowledged by the parties that City
would not have entered inW this Agreement if it were to be liable in damages under or with
respect to this Agreement or the application thereof. Owner, for itself or any successor
F: \REAL \843 \3006~004 \DEVE LOP4. AGN
10/04/95 30
thereto, expressly waives the right to seek damages against the City or any officer, employee,
or agent thereof, for any default or breach of this Agreement. As a matter of agreement
between BCI/CCL No. 1 and BCI/CCL No. 2, all costs are associated with indemnity or
liabilities described hereunder, shall be divided between such parties sixty percent (60%)
to BCI/CCL No. 2 and forty percent (40%) to BCI/CCL No. 1.
In general, each of the pardes hereto may pursue any remedy at law or equity
available for the breach of any provision of this Agreement, except that City, and its officers,
employees and agents, shall not be liable in damages to Owner or to any assignee,
transferee of Owner, or any other person, and Owner covenants not to sue for or claim any
damages for breach of that Agreement by City.
22. Attomey's Fees and Costs. If legal action by either party is brought because
of breach of this Agreement or to enforce a provision of this Agreement, the prevailing
party is entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and court costs.
23. Notices. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be
in writing and delivered in person or sent by certified mall, postage prepaid and presumed
delivered upon actual receipt by personal delivery or within three (3) days following deposit
thereof in United States Mail. Notice required to be given to City shall be addressed as
follows:
To City:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: City Clerk
With A copy to:
Peter M. Thorson, Esq.
City Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen
F: \REAL \BZ,3\3OO6AOOZ,\DEVE LOP~,. AGN
10/0~/95 3 1
611 W. Sixth Street, Suite 2500
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Notices required to be given to Owner shall be addressed as follows:
To Owner:
BCI/CCL Venture No. 1 and
BCI/CCL Venture No. 2
c/o CCL Chardonay Hills, Inc.
2010 Main Street, Suite 960
Irvine, CA 92714
Attention: Joe Richter
With A copy to:
Paimieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron
2603 Main St.,East Tower, Suite 1300
Irvine, CA 92714
Attention: Gregory N. Weiler, Esq.
A party' may change the address by giving notice in writing to the other party and thereafter
notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.
24. Cooperation. City agrees that it shall accept for processing and promptly take
action on all applications, provided they are in a proper from and acceptable for required
processing for discretionary permits, tract or parcel maps, or other land use entitlement for
development of the Project in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. City shall
cooperate with Owner in providing expeditious review of any such applications, permits, or
land use entitlement and, upon request and payment of any costs and/or extra fees
associated therewith by Owner, City shall assign to the Project planner(s), building
inspector(s), and/or other staff personnel as required to insure the timely processing and
completion of the Project.
25. Rules of Construction and Miscellaneous
Terms.
F: \REAL\8~3\3OO6~OOZ,\DEVELOP/,. AGt4
10/0z,/95 32
joint and several.
(a) The singular includes the plural; the masculine gender includes the
feminine; 'shall' is mandatory, "may' is permissive.
If there is more than one signer of this Agreement their obligations axe
written
Agreement.
(c) The time limits set forth in this Agreement may be extended by mutual
consent of the parties in accordance with the procedures for adoption of the
(d) This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and
benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. No other person, including but not
limited to third party beneficiaries,
of this Agreement.
26. Entire AEreement.
complete, final, entire,
hereto, and is intended
shall have any fight of action based upon any provision
This Agreement and the exhibits hereto contain the
and exclusive expression of the agreement between the parties
by the parties to completely state the agreement in full. Any
agreement or representation respecting the matters dealt with herein or the duties of any
party in relation thereto not expressly set forth in this Agreement shall be null and void.
27. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each
of which so fully executed counterpart shall be deemed an original. No counterpart shall
be deemed to be an original or presumed delivered unless and until the counterpart
executed by the other party to this Agreement is in the physical possession of the party
seeldng enforcement thereof.
28.
Authority to Execute. Each party hereto expressly warrants and represents
F: \REAL\8~,3\3OO6~OO4\DEVE LOP/, .AGN
10/0~/9'5 33
that he/she/they has/have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of
his/her/their corporation, partnership, business entity, or governmental entity and warrants
and represents that he/she/they has/have the authority to bind his/her/their entity to the
performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by the authorized
representatives of the parties hereto.
"City"
City of Temecula
Attest:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Peter M. -Thorson,. City Attorney
[Notary Required]
F: \REAL\8~3\3OO6GOC~\DEVELOP~. AGiq
10/0~/~5
34
"Owner
BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 1, L.P.
California limited partnership
and BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 2, L.P.,a
California limited partnership
BY: CCL CHARDONAY HILLS, INC.,
a California corporation, their
General Partner
By
Its ~c~ '~-~T.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
On OctOber 11, 1995 , before me, Arleen D. Sales,
Notary Public, personally appeared David Chang ,
personally known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me
that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that
by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity
upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and' official seal.
Signature of Notary
CAPACITY CLAIMED
BY SIGNER
Individual
~'Corporate Officer
Title(s)
President
~]'Partner(s)
71 Limited C~'General
71 Attorney-In-Fact
71 Trustee(s)
71 Guardian/Conservator
~1 Other
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
CCL Chardonnay Flill~, Inc.,
a California corporation,
General Parmer of BCI/CCL
Venture No. 1, L.P. & BCI/CCL
Venture No. 2, L.P.
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED
DOCUMENT
Amendment and Restatement of
Development Agreement
Specific Plan Area 14
Planning Application No. 94-0078
and 94-0079
"Margarita Village"
NUMBER OF PAGES
Forty-Four (44)
EXHIBIT A
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
APPROVALS
General Plan - Low-Medium Density Residential
Specific Plan - State Subdivision Map Act No. 460, Specific Plan
No. 199 (M_argarita Village), Ordinance No. 348.
Development Agreement -Development Agreement No. 5
Land Divisions - Tentative Tract 22716
Final Tract Map Nos. 23101-2; 23101-3; 23100-1; 23100-2; 23100-3;
23100-4
F: \REAL\8z.3"~3OO&~OO,G.U)EVELOP~..AGN
111061~5
EXHIBIT B
EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS
General Plan Land Use designation is Low-Medium Density Residential.
F: \REAL\8~3\3OO6/,OO~\DEVELOP,~. AGN
10/0~,/95
EXItmlT C
LEGAL D~C~ON
PARCEL 1:
Lots 1 through 9 of Tract No. 23101-3, as shown by Map on file in Book 249, pages 61 and
62 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California.
PARCEL 3:
Lots 54 through 59, inclusive, and 67 and 68 ofTFact No. 23100--1,as shown by Map on file
in Book 214, pages 5 through 11 of Maps, records of Riverside County, California;
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, all mineral, oil and gas fights below the depth of 500.00feet
below the surface of said land without the fight of surface entry as reserved by Kaiser
Development Company, a California corporation, in Deed recorded November 13, 1987 as
Instrument No. 326397 of Official Records of Riverside County, California.
PARCEL 4:
Lots 1, 2, 7, 10, 13, and 14 of Tract No. 23100-2, as shown by Map on file in Book 214,
pages 12 through 15 of Maps, records of Riverside County, California;
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, all mineral, oil and gas fights below the depth of 500.00 feet
below the surface of said land without the fight of surface entry as reserved by Kaiser
Development Company., a CalifOrnia corporation, in Deed recorded November 13, 1987 as
Instrument No. 326397 of Official Records of Riverside County, California.
PARCEL 5:
Lots 1 through 23 of Tract No. 231004, as shown by Map on file in Book 249, pages 57
through 60 of Maps, records i3f Riverside County, California;
PARCEL 6:
Lots 1 through 7, 60 through 68, and 97 through 108, inclusive, of Tract No. 23101-2 as
shown by Map on file in Book 228, pages 15 through 21, inclusive, of Maps, records of
Riverside County, California;
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, all mineral, oil and gas fights below the depth of 500.00 feet
below the surface of said land without the fight of surface entry as reserved by Kaiser
Development Company, a California corporation, in Deed recorded November 13, 1987 as
Instrument No. 326397 of Official Records of Riverside County, California and as deeded
F: \REAL \843\30064004\DEVE
11106195
to Midland Investment Corporation in document recorded April 15, 1988 as Instrument No.
99500 of Official Records of Riverside County, California.
ALSO EXCEPTING FROM SAID Lots 110 and 111 any and all oil, oil rights, minerals,
mineral rights, natural gas rights and other hydrocarbons by whatsoever name known,
geothermal steam and all products derived from any of the foregoing, that may be within
or under said property, together with the perpetual right of drilling, mining, exploring and
operating therefor and storing in and removing the same from said property or any other
land, including the right to whipstock or directionally drill and mine from lands other than
said property, oil or gas wells, tunnels and shafts into, through or across the subsurface of
said property, and to bottom such whipstocked or directionally drilled wells, tunnels and
shafts under and beneath or beyond the exterior limits thereof, and to redrill, retunnel,
equip, maintain, repair, deepen and operate any such wells or mines without, however, the
right to drill, mine, store, explore or operate through the surface or upper 500 feet of the
subsurface of said property, purportedly reserved by Bramalea California, Inc., in deeds
recorded October 5, 1994 as Instrument No. 385827 and 385828, both of Official Records
of Riverside County, California.
PARCEL 7:
Lots 2 through 28, inclusive, and 60 through 67 inclusive, of Tract No. 23100-3, as shown by
Map on file in Book 222 Pages 44 through 49 of Maps, records of Riverside County,
California;
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, all mineral, oil and gas rights below the depth of 500.00 feet
below the surface of said land without the right of surface entry as reserved by Kaiser
Development Company, a California corporation, in Deed recorded November 13, 1987 as
Instrument -No. 326397 of Official Records of Riverside County, California.
PARCEL 8:
Lot 1 of Tract No. 23100-3 as shown by Map on file in Book 222 pages 44 through 49 of
Maps, records of Riverside County, California, together with that certain portion of Lot 39,
Tract No. 20879, as shown by Map on file in Book 169 pages 16 through 19 of Maps,
records of Riverside County, California, more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most westerly comer of said Lot 1, said comer also being a point on
the Northeasterly line of said Lot 39; thence Southeasterly, along the Southwesterly line of
said Lot 1, and the Northeasterly line of said Lot 39, South 36° 06' 41" East (South 36°
06'31"East per M.B. 169/16-19), a distance of 80.00feet to the Southwest comer of said Lot
1;
thence leaving said Southwesterly line of said Lot 1 and the Northeasterly line of said Lot
39, South 53° 53' lg"West, a distance of 88.46 feet;
thence North 08°06'32"West, a distance of 86.18 feet;
F: \REAL\8~3\3OO6~OO~\DEVELOP,~. AGN
11106195
thence North 17°51'01"west, a distance of 50.84 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said
Lot 39;
thence Northeasterly, along the Northerly line of said Lot 39, North 67° 31'01"East (North
67° 31'll"East per M.B. 169/16-19) a distance of 33.00feet to the most Northerly corner
of said lot 39, said point also being a point on the Southwesterly line of Lot 2 of said Tract
No. 23100-3;
thence Southeasterly along the Southeasterly line of said Lot 39 and the Southwesterly line
of said Lot 2, South 36°06'41"East (South 36°06'31~East per M.B. 169/16-19), a distance
of 36.59 feet to the most Westerly corner of said Lot 1, said point also being the point of
beginning .,-
PARCEL 9:
Lot 68 of Tract No. 23100-3 as shown by Map on file in Book 222 pages 44 through 49 of
Maps, records of Riverside County, California, together with that portion of'Parcel 1 of
Parcel Map No. 22554, as shown by Map on file in Book 147, pages 94 to 98 thereof of
Parcel Maps, records of Riverside County, Califomia, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 68, said corner being a point on a curve
concave to the Southwest having a radius of 1770.00 feet to which point a radial line bears
North 52° 35'24"East;
thence Southeasterly along the Easterly line of. said Lot 68 and along said curve through a
central angle of 2°25'13"an arc length of 74.77 feet to the true point of beginning;
thence Southeasterly, leaving said Easterly line, South 34° 59'23"East, a distance of 17.46
feet;
thence South 55°29'05"West a distance of0.09feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 68,
said corner being a point on a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 1770.00
feet to which point a radial line bears North 55° 34' 31" East;
thence Northwesterly, along the Easterly line of said Lot 68 and along said curve through
a central angle of 0° 33'54",an arc length of 17.45 feet to the true point of beginning.
F: \REAL \8~3\3OO6~OO~\DEVELOP~, .AGH
11
REQUEST
EXHIBIT D
FOR NOTICE OF DEFAULT UNDER DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT
Development Arreement:
Amendment and Restatement
of Development Agreement
Specific Plan Now 199. Mar~arita
Planning Application No.
Village
Date:
To: City Clerk and Planning Director, City of Temecula
Pursuant to Section 6Co) and (c) of the above-referenced Amendment and
Restatement of Development Agreement, request is hereby made by
as Mortgagee for the property (or portion thereof) to receive copies of any Notice of
Default issued by City against Owner in accordance with the terms and conditions of such
Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement. Copies of any such Notices
should be mailed to the following address:
(Mortgagee)
(Person/Department)
(Address)
(City/State/Zip)
(Telephone No.)
A copy of this Notice should be filed with the project file to insure proper and timely
notice is given. Under the teams of said Amendment and Restatement of Development
Agreement, as Mortgagee is entitled to receive copies of any Notice of Default within ten
(10) days of sending any such Notice to Owner. Failure to send any such Notice may have
serious lel, al consequences for the City.
This request is to remain in effect until revoked by as Mortgagee or the Amendment
and Restatement of Development Agreement is terminated.
The person executing this document on behalf of said Mortgagee warrants and
represents that the entity he/she represents is a bonafide Mortgagee of said property and
is entitled to receive copies of Notices of Default under said Amendment and Restatement
of Development Agreement.
F: \REAL \8~,3\3OO(~OO4~DEVE LOP/, .AGN
10/04,/95
The undersigned declares the above information is true and correct under the penalty
of perjury under the laws of the State of California.
Dated: ,1995.
MORTGAGEE
By:
(signature)
Its:
(printed name)
(flUe)
[Notary required]
This Notice is to be sent to both the City Clerk and Planning Director for the City of
Temecula at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 or such other location as
Temecula City Hall may be located in the future.
F: \REAL\8,G3\3OO6&.OO4.\DEVELOP/, .AGN
10/0,G/95
EXHIBIT E
PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE FOR RECREATION CENTER
[See attached]
F: \REAL \8/e3\3OO&f, OO~\DEVE LOP~,. AGN
10/G4/95
CCL CENSTKUCMON,
cny dTemsmh ~,;~4~ DepL
43174 Bmbsms :pszk D~v~
Tr,,.~so. C,,~re,.,,p. 92590
Plmse f. md·,u'~'''''' mnupdmtsd sobsdido fortbe Roaeafian~ Arm for TrssZ23103-l st
C:htrdonnmY Hills*
To izauze'tiz,-,,..- 'La~ facilifiaproZre~ llmsposo~ng tbs followb8 aidcml dses u, our
Pzoduaim Sbbpourcssnatmst"'*° tbeTemsis Coaztlspauredms~.Fnan.lns
boo msths~ntlr~q **" 'nJ~ldl'egtm°rabautOct°bec9'
Fr.~= 1,- ~-- ' :^--' for pt~.~J0s unlu ~ sn~ until a Ceni~.-~- of
Oc,.~p.~-7 is issusd for bs !teczsrbTp"l sits om wdsout i::)eonnbst 10, 199~.
Pleas cos au il~.tbSsedtmmeetwtshY°ursPPmvdezify°useedmy furLha infoms~on-
My phoz mu~ is (714) 553-3214 exz. #1~.
chm4. w. mufti
mmm
F
-- ~. ~,. -a'ieee
ONeetA:- lael'gl,i.! OATe~ 3 cw, m, ww
mad i O,~n,iw t ~
A'H'ACHMENT NO. 3
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FOR THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING,
SEPTEMBER 12, 1995
R:~STAFFRPT~78PA95.CC 11/3/95 sn -9-
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director
September 12, 1995
Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Specific Plan #199,
BCI/CCL
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council approve the Memorandum of Understanding, provided that
a construction schedule for the Recreation Center acceptable to the Community Development
Director is added to the MOU prior to execution, and direct the Mayor to execute the
Agreement on behalf of the City and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
BACKGROUND:
BCI/CCL was the silent partner with Bramalea in the Chardonnay Hills tract (refer to
Attachment No. I for the Vicin!ty Map). BCI/CCL has taken over the partnership and will be
building out the tract..In Section I of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). BCI/CCL has
committed to completing the Recreation Center by November 15, 1995 and prior to issuance
of occupancy permits for any homes. The Recreation Center has been the center 0~ recent
controversy since Bramalea did not complete it in a timely manner. To insure the completion -
of the Recreation Center by the above deadline, staff recommends that the developer commit
to a construction schedule for the Recreation Center prior to execution of the MOU by the
Mayor. This schedule should also be made a part of the Development Agreement that will
follow the approval of this MOU.
ANALYSIS:
The attached MOU authorizes BCI/CCL to obtain building permits and occupancy permits for
homes in their development without payment of the Public Facilities Fees until such time as
the first production home obtains its Certificate of Occupancy. This provision is consistent
with iDrevious approvals granted to similar I~rojects in the City such as Cosrain Homes and Van
Daele Development Corporation. The City is currently negotiating a new Development
Agreement between the City and BCI/CCL for this project. Approval of this MOU will not
mandate that the City Council approve the draft Development Agreement. In the event that
the City Council denies the draft Development Agreement, the Memorandum of Understanding
provides that BCI/CCL will then pay the Public Facilities Fees as provided in the existing
Development Agreement No. 5.
R:~-STAFFRPT%CCL.MOU 9/7195 so
This MOU will allow the development of homes in the BCI/CCL project to move forward in an
expeditious fashion. BCI/CCL is agreeing to pay an Interim Public Facility Fee in the amount
of $3,000.00 per unit.
The indemnity provisions of this MOU are the same as the MOU between the City and Van
Daele. The existing Development Agreement {Riverside County Development Agreement No.
5) contains very broad indemnity language sufficient to protect the City's interests. This MOU
contains adequate language protecting the City against any challenges to the fee issue.
The Planning Commission and City Council will be presented in the near future with the draft
Development Agreement- The terms of the draft Development Agreement will be subject to
extensive negotiations between the City and the developer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Development Agreement No. 5 Fee:
Interim Public Facilities Fee to be Collected:
111 Dwelling Units X $5,271 =.$585,081
111 Dwelling Units X $3,000 = 8333,000
Attachments:
Vicinity Map - Page 3
Memorandum of Understanding - Page 4
R:~STAFFRP'BCCL.MOU 9//195
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRFI'~CCL.MOU 9/7/95
CITY OF TEIVIECULA
II t ';
/~ ~
~ I
11 I II
.- /
CASE NO. - SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199
ATTACHMENT- 1
CITY COUNCIL DATE - SEPTEMBER 12, 1995
VICINITY MAP
R:\ST.-kFFRPT',CCL,MOU 915/95 sn
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
R:'~'rAFFR. FI~,CCL.MOU 9/'7/95
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING
PLANNING AREA No. 14 OF SPECIFIC PLAN No. 199
BCI/CCL VENTURES No. 1 and No. 2
This Memorandum of Understanding, (the "Memorandum") is made
and entered into as of August __, 1995 by and between the City
of Temecula (the "CityJ') and BCI/CCL Venture No. 1, L.P.
("BCI/CCL No. 1") and BCI/CCL Venture No. 2, L.P. ("BCI/CCL No.
2"), both California limited partnerships (BCI/CCL No. 1 and
BCI/CCL No. 2 are collectively referred to a "Owner". )
RECITALS:
A. The City Council of the'City of Temecula is reviewing and
considering, as provided by law, an Amendment and Restatement of
Development Agreement between City and Owner (the "Draft
Agreement")-
B. Owner is developing a residential project in what is known
as Planning Area No. 14 of Specific Plan No. 199, Tract Nos.
23100-1 (8 lots); 23100-2 (15.1ors); 23100-3 (28 lots); 23100-4
(23 lots); 23i01-2 (28 lots); and 23101-3 (9 lots) for a total of'
II1 lots (collectively, the "Project"). The Project is currently
subject to Development Agreement No. 5 between the County of
Riverside (the "County") and Kaiser Development Company, a
California corporation; Mesa Homes, a California corporation;
Margarita Village Development Company, a California joint
venture comprised of Buie-Ranch California, Ltd., a California
limited partnership and Nevada Rancho California, Ltd., a
California limited partnership; and Tayco, a California general
partnership comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, and others dated November 7, 1988 (the "Development
Agreement No. 5"), which requires Owner to pay certain
development fees (the "Development Fee").
C. Riverside County Ordinance No. 659, as adopted by the City,
establishes public facilities and services impact fees for
residential development with City ("RSA Fees"). City requires
these revenues to mitigate the impact of development. City
requires RSA Fees from development of the Project in order to
complete capital projects to mitigate the impact of the
development.
D. As the result of meetings between representatives of the
City and representatives of the Owner, the City has agreed that
the Project would be eligible for a development fee reduction due
to: (i) the excessive level at which the County originally
calculated the Development Fee; and (ii) the entry level nature
of the homes to be built in the Project.
F: \real \843\30064004\memo5 .agm
E. Development Agreement No. 5 provided for public facilities
and services impact fees ("County Impact Fees") higher than the
RSA Fees. These higher fees, pal-Cicularly during the present
recession, unduly discourage and delay development and thereby
prevent City from ever receiving the RSA Fees. Consequently, the
City desires to reduce the County Impact Fees for residential
development in the Project to a level comparable to RSA Fees.
F. The Project has been substantially delayed by reason of
adverse market conditions and the pending bankruptcy of Bramalea
U.S.A., Owner's predecessor in interest. The parties intend by
this Agreement to facilitate new construction within the Project
during the remainder of 1995's selling season (late summer and
fall) in an effort to'obtain lost market momentum for the
Project, and avoid the adverse consequences to the Project and
City resulting from further delays in implementing the Project.
G. The Draft Agreement provides for Owner to pay the'sum of
Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) for each residential unit as
the Interim Public Facilities Fee. The Draft Agreement provides
for the collection of any Interim Public Facilities Fee to be
deferred until such time as Owner obtained a certificate of
occupancy for the first production home built in the Project.
H. Owner contemplates commencing construction of the homes for
the Project (111 Lots ) prior to acceptance by the City Council
of the Draft Agreement.
I. Owner intends to immediately commence the completion of the
Recreational Facility required incident to the approval of Tract
23103-1 which has been delayed because of adverse market
conditions, and complete said facility by Novez~Der 10, 1995.
J. City desires, as an accommodation to Owner, to permit Owner
to pay the Interim Public Facilities Fee contemplated in the
Draft Agreement for all the homes in the Project, despite the
fact that the Draft Agreement providing for payment of the
Interim Public Facilities Fee has not yet been approved by City.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
hereinafter contained, City and Owner 'agree as follows:
1. Modification of Fee. In lieu of any fee required by
Development Agreement No. 5, RSA Fee or City Public Facilities
Fee, Owner shall pay an Interim Public Facilities Fee in the
amount of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) per dwelling unit
within the Project. If City fails to approve or adopt the Draft
Agreement or if the Interim Public Facilities Fee, as established
by City, is some number other then Three Thousand Dollars
($3,000.00) per dwelling unit, then the fee paid by Owner to
City shall be adjusted accordingly. Owner shall pay any increase
or City shall pay to Owner any decrease within thirty (30) days
F: \ real \843\30064004\memo5. agm - 2 --
from the effective date of.City Council's action on the Amendment
and Restatement of Development Agreement.
2. Fee Deferral. The Interim Public Facilities Fee for all
units within the Project shall be deferred until such time as a
certificate of occupancy has been obtained for the first
production home built in the Project. Upon the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the first production home within the
Project, Owner shall pay to the City the Interim Public Facility
Fee for each unit for which such fee had been deferred.
Thereafter, the Interim Public Facilities Fee shall be paid at
the time of issuance of building permits for each residential
unit constructed in the-Project.
3. Completion of Recreational FacilitY.
(a) Owner shall commence construction of the Recreational
Facility required incident to the approval of Tract 23103-!
{"Recreational Facility") on approximately August 15, 1995.
Owner shall use commercially reasonable efforts to complete the
· construction of such facility as soon as practicable, but no
later than November 15, 1995. Owner agrees that City shall not
issue any certificate of occupancy for any dwelling unit
constructed pursuant to any building permit issued on or after
the date of this Memorandum, until such time as the Recreational
Facility is completed and accepted by the City.
(b) Notwithstanding the preceding, Owner's obligations
under this paragraph 3 are expressly conditioned upon (i) Owner
acquiring title to the Property on which the Recreational
Facility is to be constructed, or written permission from the
Owner thereof to construct such facility; and (ii) approval by
the United States Bankruptcy Court of the Third Amendment to
Partnership Agreements for Owner.
4. Indemnity and Cost of Litigation
4.1 County Litication Concernin~ ACreement. In the event
the County seeks to challenge the right of City and Owner to
enter into this Memorandum, and institutes an action, suit or
proceeding to challenge this Memorandum or invalidate and/or
enjoin the enforcement of this Memorandum, City and Owner agree
to cooperate and participate in a joint defense in any action
against the parties, their officers, agents, and employees, from
and against any and all such obligations, liability, suit,. claim,
loss, judgment or lien, resulting from such action(s) brought by
County (but excluding actions to expunge any lis pendens) and to
share the costs associated with attorneys' fees and costs that
the parties may incur as the result of any such action or lawsuit
to challenge City and/or Owner's legal authority to enter into
this Memorandum. If the County action is against all impacted
developments for which the City has lowered the county fees, the
F: \real \843\30064004\memo5. agm, -3 -
Owner's defense costs heroin shall be its pro rata share among
all impacted landowners based on a faction, the numerator of
which is the total units owned by Owner which are subject to this
Memorandum and the denominator is the total number Of units
within the City in which the City has lowered the County Fees.
If the County action is only against Owner with respect to this
Memorandum, and not against other impacted landowners for which
the City has lowered the County fees, then Owner's defense costs
shall be 100% of the attorneys' fees and costs for defense of the
litigation. Damages (including the difference in the amount of
any Interim Public Facilities Fee and the amount of the County
Development Agreement Fee paid by Owner to City pursuant to the
terms of this Memorandum) shall be the responsibility of Owner.
To the extent Owner has paid Interim Public Facilities Fees
and/or County Development Agreement Fees to City of which it is
adjudicated (by final judgment of a court of competent
jurisdiction) are lawfully the funds of County, City shall pay
such sums to County and Owner shall have such liability for the
payment of the difference between such fees reduced by the amount
paid by the City. City and Owner shall mutually agree on legal
counsel to be retained to defend any such action(s) brought by
the County as heroin provided. City and Owner each reserve the
right to withdraw from the defense of the County litigation in
the event the County prevails at the trial level and there is an
appeal. If either party withdraws after the trial and there is
an appeal, the remaining party shall pay all the costs and fees
associated.with said appeal. As a matter of agreement between
BCI/CCL No. 1 and BCI/CCL No, 2, all costs are associated with
indemnity set forth in this paragraph 4 or liabilities
described in paragraphs 4.2 and 4.4 beloG, shall be divided
between such parties sixty percent (60%) to BCI/CCL No. 2 and
forty percent (40%) to BCI/CCL No. 1.
4.2 Public Facilities Fees Shortfall. In the event the
county prevails in any legal action or other proceeding to
challenge, set aside, or enjoin the enforcement of this
Memorandum and a trial court determines by final judgment or
order that the Owner and/or the City is liable to make up any
shortfall between the amount of the Interim Public Facilities Fee
or the City Public Facilities Fee, as the case may be, and the
County Development Agreement Fee which would otherwise have been
imposed pursuant to Development Agreement No. 5, then Owner shall
be responsible for paying any such shortfall subject to City's
payment to County of any amounts collected and held by City under
the terms of Development Agreement No. 5. Such payment by City
to County shall reduce Owner's liability to County for payment of
such fees by a like amount paid by City.
4.3 Count? Prevails in LitiCation - Sever~bi!itv. In the
event the County prevails at the trial court level against the
City or the Owner as described in Section 4.1 of this Memorandum,
the amount of the Interim Public Facilities Fee or the City
-4--
F: \real \8-t3\3006400-t\mem=5. agn
Public Facilities Fee, as the case may be, shall revert to the
amount of the County Development Agreement Fee in effect at the
time of entry of the final judgment in favor of the County (or
such lesser amount as determined by the Court)- In the event his
MemOrandum is held to be invalid or unenforceab!e by a trial
court of competen~ jurisdiction, Owner shall thereafter pay the
County Development Agreement Fee as provided in Section 4.2 of
Development Agreement No. 5 (or such lesser amount as determined
by the Court). All other provisions of this Memorandum or any
subsequent agreements relating to the Project shall remain valid
and enforceable notwithstanding said ruling of invalidity.
4.4 Third Party Litication ConcerninC ACreement. Owner
shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees,
indemnify, and hold harmless City, its agents, officers and
employees from any claim, action or proceeding against City, its
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or
annul the approval of this Memorandum or the approval of any
permit granted pursuant to this Memorandum brought by a third
party other than the County, which claim, action or proceeding is
based'upon this Memorandum. City shall promptly notify Owner of
any such claim, action, or proceeding, and City shall cooperate
in the defense. If City fails to promptly notify Owner of any
such claim, action, or proceeding, or if City fails to cooperate
in the defense, Owner shall not thereafter be responsible to
defend, indemnify, or hold harmless City. City may in its
discretion participate in the defense of any such claim, action
or proceeding.
4.5 Termination of Memorandum of Understanding- If the
Draft Agreement is approved by the City Council, this Memorandum
shall terminate upon the effective date of the Draft Agreement.
If the Draft Agreement is disapproved by final action by the City
Council, then the obligations of Owner under this Memorandum
shall terminate and Owner thereafter shall be subject to the
terms of Development Agreement No. 5.
5. Rancho California 'Road Fund. Owner and City acknowledge and
agree that no building permits for any dwelling unit within the
Project shall be issued by the City until such time as the Rancho
California Road Fund has been funded, as required by the terms of
the agreement establishing such Fund.
iN WITNESS W~EREOF, the parties executed this Memorandum as of
this day August, 1995.
By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeff Stone, Mayor
F :\real \843\30064004\met~cS. a~m --5 --
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
kPPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 1, L.P.
California limited partnership
and BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 2,
L.P., a California limited
partnership
BY: COL CHARDONAY HILLS,
INC., a California
corporation, their
General Partner
By
Its
real \843\30064004\men~5. agm -- 6 --
A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, OCTOBER 2, 1995
R:\STAFFRPT~78PA95.CC 1 I/3/95 sn - ] 0-
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 16, 1995
Planning Application No.: PA95-0078
Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5 for
Final Tract Maps 23100-1,23100-2, 23100-3, 23100-4, 23101-2, and 23101-3, within
Specific Plan No. 199.
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
1. ADOPT the Negative Declaration for PA95-0078; and
m
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
EXISTING LAND USE:
ADOPT Resolution No. 95- recommending approval of
PA95-0078 by City Council, based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report.
BCI/CCL
Charles Kluger
A Request for Approval of a Development Agreement for Final
Tract Maps 23100-1, 23100-2, 23100-3, 23100-4, 23101-2,
and 23101-3, within Specific Plan No. 199.
Located at Rancho California Road and Promenade Chardonnay
Hills Road
SP (Specific Plan)
North:
South:
East:
West:
SP (Specific Plan)
SP (Specific Plan)
SP (Specific Plan)
SP (Specific Plan)
N/A
Low Medium Density Residential (3 to 6 dwelling units per acre)
Vacant
R:\STAFFRPT~,78PA95.PC 9/26/95 sn 1
SURROUNDING
LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Single Family Dwellings
Single Family Dwellings
Single Family Dwellings
Single Family Dwellings
PROJECT STATISTICS
Number of Lots:
Existing Development Agreement Fee:
Proposed Development Agreement Fee:
111
$5,271.00/Unit
93,000.00/Unit
BACKGROUND
On November 7, 1988 Development Agreement No. 5 was approved by the County of
Riverside for the Margarita Village Specific Plan (S.P. 199) which includes Tracts 23100-1,
23100-2,23100-3,23100-4,23101-2, and 23101-3. BCI/CCL was the silent partner with
Bramalea in the Chardonnay Hills tract (refer to Exhibit A for the Vicinity Map). BCI/CCL has
taken over the partnership and will be building out the tract. Recently BCI/CCL approached
the City to execute an Amendment and Restatement of this Development Agreement in order
to receive a reduction in the Development Agreement fees.
As a first step in the process, the City and the developer entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) on September 12, 1995 which was included for the Planning
Commissions' information with the August 21, 1995 Packet (refer to Attachment No. 4 for
the City Council Staff Report and the MOU). This MOU authorizes the collection of 93,000.00
per unit Interim Public Facility Fee when the owners obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the
first production home built in the project. Moreover, the developer has committed to complete
the Recreation Center on or about December 10, 1995. This Recreation Center has been· the
center of controversy since the original developer, Bramalea, did not complete it in a timely
manner consistent with the Conditions of Approval. These commitments set the foundation
for the Amended and Re-Stated Development Agreement.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Development Agreement Fee includes only an Interim Public Facilities Fee and
has eliminated other fees associated with County approved Development Agreements such
as the Regional Parkland Fee, Habitat Conservation Fee, and Public Services Offset Fee.
· Interim Public Facilities Fee
The Amended and Re-Stated Development Agreement has a duration period of ten (10) years
and applies to the following Tracts: 23100-1,23100-2, 23100-3,23100-4, 23101-2, and
23101-3. These tracts contain I 11 single family lots. The Interim Public Facilities Fee will
be 93,000.00 per unit and will be paid for the first five (5) years of the term of the
Agreement. After this period, the developer will either continue to pay the Interim Public
Facility Fee of 93,000.00 or such other Public Facilities Fee adopted by the City and applied
to other residential projects.
R:\STAFFRIs'~TgPA95.PC 10111195 sn 2
ANALYSIS
Fees
The existing approved Development Agreement No. 5 fee includes the following fees:
Public Facilities Fee
Regional Parkland Fee
Habitat Conservation Fee
Public Services Offset Fee
92,331.00
9431.00
9320.00
$2.189.00
Total Development Agreement Fee 95,271.00
According to the County, all County approved Development Agreements have a section which
purports to require the split of certain fees between the County and a city should any portion
of the property covering the agreement become part of a city. That section provides that the
Regional Parkland Fee (9431.00), and the Habitat Conservation and the Open Space Land Fee
(9320.00) would continue to be fully payable to the County. Additionally, two-thirds (2/3) of
the Public Services Offset Fee (92,189.00)and 5.3% of the Public Facilities Fee (92,331.00)
would be payable to the County. Therefore, according to the County, a total of 92,333.87
is payable to the County from the 95,271.00 Development Agreement Fee, leaving 92,937.13
as the City's portion of this fee. The proposed 93,000.00 Interim Public Facilities Fee is
greater than 92,937.13, City's portion of the existing Development Agreement Fee, should
the County interpretation of the fees be used.
However, the City Attorney contends that the County's interpretation of the Development
Agreement is not in accordance with State law which provides that the benefits of a
Development Agreement as well as its burdens transfer to a City upon incorporation. As the
property which is the subject of this Development Agreement is now within the City
boundaries~ it is the City Attorney's opinion that the County is no longer entitled to any fees
under the Development Agreement.
Recreation Center
As a part of the MOU and the Development Agreement, the developer has committed to
complete the Recreation Center on or about December 10, 1995. To insure the completion
of the Recreation Center by this date, the developer and staff have agreed on a construction
schedule that ties the completion of the Recreation Center to the inspections of the production
homes. The following two milestones are set:
Production home slab pours cannot start until the Tennis
Court is poured and framing inspection is completed on
the pool equipment building on or about October 9, 1995. '
Framing inspections for production homes cannot start
until a final clearance is issued for the Recreation Center
site on or about December 10, 1995.
For a complete construction schedule refer to Attachment No. 5.
R:\STAFFRPT~75PA95,1~C 10/11/95 sa 3
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
This project is consistent with the General Plan since the General Plan currently designates the
site as Low Medium Density Residential and the approved development project which is
implemented by this Development Agreement is consistent with this designation. This project
is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199, since the development project which is implemented
by this Development Agreement meets all the requirements of this Specific Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Initial Study was prepared for this project and it revealed no significant impacts. Therefore,
Staff recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration (refer to Attachment No. 3 for a copy
of the Initial Study).
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
Since other projects have received reductions in Development Agreement fees, Staff supports
approval of this project.
FINDINGS
The Amendment and Restatement of Dev. elopment Agreement No. 5 is consistent with
the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the City of
Temecula's General Plan in that the Development Agreement makes reasonable
provision for the use of certain real property for residential development and is
consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of Low Medium Density
Residential.
o
The Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5 is compatible with
the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district in which
the Property subject to the Development Agreement is located as the Development
Agreement provides for single family homes. This Development Agreement is
consistent with good planning practices by providing for the opportunity to develop the
Property consistent with the General Plan.
The Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5 is in conformity
with the public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practice because it
makes reasonable provision for a balance of housing opportunities compatible with the
remainder of the City.
The Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5 will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare because it provides adequate
assurances for the protection thereof.
Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was published in a
newspaper of general circulation at least twenty (20) days before the Planning
commission public hearing, and mailed or delivered at least twenty (20) days prior to
the hearing to the project applicant and to each agency expected to provide water,
R:~qTAFFRPT~.78PA95.PC 9/26/95 sn 4
sewer, schools, police protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within
six hundred feet (600') of the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment
roll.
w
Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission included the date, time,
and place of the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, a general explanation
of the matter to be considered, a general description and text or by diagram of the
location of the real property that is the subject of the hearing, and of the need to
exhaust administrative remedies.
The Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5 complies with the
goals and objectives of the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The traffic impacts
of the development over the period of the Development Agreement will be substantially
mitigated by the mitigation measures and conditions of approval imposed.
The Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5 complies with
requirements of the zoning district in which the applicant proposes to.develop in that
the Specific Plan zoning of Medium Density Residential is consistent with the Low
Medium Density Residential General Plan Land Use Designation.
m
The benefits that will accrue to the people of the City of Temecula from this legislation
and this Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5 are as
follows:
City and Owner ack. nowledge that development of the Project will result in:
a. Generation of municipal revenue;
b. Construction of Public infrastructure facilities;
Ce
Enhancement of the quality of life; including residential opportunities for present
and future residents of the City;
dt
The opportunity for an adjacent residential-commercial project creating
significant job opportunities, sales tax and ad valorera tax revenues for the City;
e. Payment of Public Facilities Fees (fire and traffic signal mitigation); and,
Attachments:
Participation in special assessment districts to finance City and
infrastructure improvements.
regional
2.
3.
4.
PC Resolution No. 95- o Blue Page 6
Ordinance No. 95- - Blue Page 10
Initial Study - Blue Page 15
City Council Staff Report for the Memorandum of Understanding, September 12, 1995- Blue
Page 30
Construction Schedule - Blue Page 31
Proposed Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5 - Blue Page 32
Exhibits - Blue Page 33
A. Vicinity Map
R:~"TAFFRPT~78PA95.PC 9/26/95 sn 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 95-
R:~TAFFRP'~78PA95.PC 9/26/95 rn 6
ATFACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 9~-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 5 BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
BCI/CCL FOR FINAL TRACT MAPS NO. 23100-1, 23100-2, 23100-3,
23100.-4, 23101-2, and 23101-3, WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0078).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula has received an
application for an Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5, Specific Plan
No. 199, "Margarita Village," Planning Application No. PA95-0078, (hereinafter "Development
Agreement"); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on October 2, 1995,
on the issue of recommending approval or denial of the Development Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt and
approve the Ordinance approving the Development Agreement, Attachments "A" and "B",
respectively, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, subject to the Conditions
of Approval attached hereto as Attachment "C" and incorporated herein by this reference as set
forth in full herein.
Section 2. That in recommending the adoption by the City of the Ordinance approving
the Development Agreement, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
(a) The Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies,
general land uses, and programs specified in the City of Temecula's General Plan in that the
Development Agreement makes reasonable provision for the use of certain real property for
residential development and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of low-
medium density residential; and,
(b) The project subject to the Development Agreement is compatible with the uses
authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the Specific Plan Zone district in which the
Property subject to the Development Agreement is located, and that this Development Agreement
is consistent with good planning practices by providing for the opportunity to develop the
Property consistent with the General Plan; and,
R:\STAFFRPTX78PA95.PC 9~26~95 $n 7
(c) The Development Agreement is in conformity with the public convenience,
general welfare, and good land use practice because it makes reasonable provision for a balance
of land uses compatible with the remainder of the City; and,
(d) The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety,
or general welfare because it provides adequate assurances for the protection thereof; and,
(e) Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was
published in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days before the Planning
Commission public hearing, and mailed or delivered at least ten (10) days prior to the heating
to the project applicant and to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police
protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within three hundred feet (300') of
the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll; and,
(f) Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission included the
date, time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, a general
explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description and text or diagram of the
location of the real property that is the subject of the hearing, and of the need to exhaust
administrative remedies; and,
(g) The Development Agreement complies with the goals and objectives of the
Circulation Element of the General Plan and the traffic impacts of the development over the
period of the Development Agreement will be substantially mitigated by the mitigation measures
and conditions of approval imposed; and,
(h) The Development Agreement complies with requirements of the zoning
district in which the applicant proposes to develop in that the Medium Density Residential is
consistent with the Low Medium Residential General Plan Land lJse Designation; and,
(i) The benefits that will accrue to the people of the City of Temecula from
this legislation and this Development Agreement are as follows:
City and Owner acknowledge that development of the Project will result in the
1. Generation of municipal revenue;
2. Construction of public infrastructure facilities;
3. Acceleration of both the timely development of subject property as well
as the payment of municipal revenue;
4. Enhancement of quality of life for surrounding residents with the timely
development through the elimination of dust and nuisance of partially improved lots;
5. Payment of Public Facility Fees (fire, library, traffic signal mitigation,
development and RSA); and,
R:\STAFFRPT~78PA95.PC 9/26/95 sn 8
Section 3. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall cause this Resolution
to be transmitted to the City Council for further proceedings in accordance with State law.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this __ day of
,1995.
STEVEN J. FORD
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the __ day of __
, 199_, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORNHILL
SECRETARY
R:~STAFFRPTX78PA95.PC 9/26/95 an ~}
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
R:\STAFFRPT~78PA95,PC 9/26/95 sn 10
A'ITACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND
RESTATFA~NT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 5 BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BCI/CCL FOR FINAL TRACT MAPS
NO. 23100-1, 23100-2, 23100-3, 23100-4, 23101-2, AND 23101-3, WITHIN
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0078).
WHEREAS, Section 65864 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California
and Temecula City Resolution No. 91-52 authorize the execution of agreements establishing and
maintaining requirements applicable to the development of real property; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedure specified in said Resolution, BCI/CCL,
a California Limited Partnership, hereinafter "BCI/CCL" has filed with the City of Temecula
an application for a Development Agreement which reflects an amendment and restatement of
existing County Development Agreement No. 5 (hereinafter "this Agreement"), of a residential
housing subdivision on its property for Tracts 23100-1 (8 lots), 23100-2 (15 lots), 23100-3 (28
lots), 23100-4 (23 lots), 23101-2 (28 lots), 23101-3 (9 lots), hereinafter the "Subject Property"
which application has been reviewed and accepted for filing by the Community Development
Director; and,
.WHEREAS, notice of the City's intention to consider adoption of this Agreement with
BCI/CCL,-has been duly given in the form and manner required by law, and the Planning
Commission and City Council of said City have each conducted public hearings on October 2,
1995 (Planning Commission), and October 24, 1995 (City Council) at which time it heard and
considered all evidence relevant and material to said subject.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. FINDINGS. The City Council hereby finds and determines, with respect
to this Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and BCI/CCL, that it:
A. Is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs
specified in the City of Temecula's General Plan in that this Agreement makes reasonable
provision for the use of certain real property for residential development consistent with the
General Plan's land use designation of low-medium density residential;
B. Is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the
land use district in which the Subject Property referred to herein is located as this Agreement
provides for residential development pursuant to a Specific Plan;
R:XSTAFFRP'B78PA95.PC 9/26/95 sn 'l ']
C. Is in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare, and good land use
practice because it makes reasonable provision for a balance of land uses compatible with the
remainder of the City;
D. Will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare because it
provides adequate assurances for the protection thereof;
E. Notice of the public heating before the Planning Commission was published in
a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days before the Planning Commission public
hearing, and mailed or delivered at least ten (10) days prior to the heating to the project
applicant and to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and
fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600') of the property as
shown on the latest equalized assessment roll;
F. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission included the date,
time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the heating body, a general explanation of
the matter to be considered, a general description in text or diagram of the location of the real
property that is the subject of the heating, and of the need to exhaust administrative remedies;
G. Notice of the public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper
of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the City Council public hearing, mailed at
least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to the project applicant, to each agency expected to
provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners
within six hundred feet (600') of the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll;
H. Notice of the City Council hearing included the date, the time, and place of the
public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, the general explanation of the matter to be
considered, a general description in text or by diagram of the location of the Property that is the
subject of the hearing, and the notice of the need to exhaust administrative remedies;
I. City Council approved this Agreement by Ordinance based upon evidence and
findings of the Planning Commission and new evidence presented at its hearing on this
Agreement, giving its reasons therefor and setting their relationship between this Agreement and
the General Plan;
K. The benefits that will accrue to the people of the City of Temecula from this
legislation and this Agreement are as follows:
1. Generation of municipal revenue;
2. Construction of public infrastructure facilities;
3. Acceleration of both the timely development of subject property as well
as the payment of municipal revenue;
4. Enhancement of quality of life for surrounding residents with the timely
development through the elimination of dust and nuisance of partially improved lots;
R:XSTAFFRPT~78PA95.PC 9/26/95 sn ] 2
5. Payment of Public Facility Fees (fire, library, traffic signal mitigation,
development and RSA); and,
6. Help ensure solvency of Assessment District 159 and Community Facilities
District 88-3 as Van Daele has elected to use legislation to help offset burden to pay off each
of these districts for subject property in their entirety and these districts finance City and
regional improvements.
Section 2. APPROVAL. This Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference as Attachment "1" is hereby approved. The Mayor is authorized and directed
to evidence such approval by executing this Agreement for, and in the name of, the City of
Temecula; and the City Clerk is directed to attest thereto; provided, however, that this
Agreement shall not be executed by the City until this Ordinance takes effect and the City has
received from the applicant two executed originals of said Agreement.
Section 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions
of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold
any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. NOTICE OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 5. This 'Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:\STAFFRPTX78PA95.PC 9/26/95 sn I ~
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 199_, and that thereafter,
said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
day of 199_, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~STAFFRPT~78PA95.PC 9126195 sn '14
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL STUDY
R:~STAFFRPT~78PA95.PC 9/25/95 sn 15
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Initial Environmental Study
I. BACKGROUND INFORMA~ON
1. Name of Project:
2. Case Numbers:
Chardonnay Hills
Planning Application No. PA95-0023 (Amendment and Restatement
of Development Agreement No. 5)
Location of Project:
Description of Project:
5. Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Located at Rancho California Road and Promenade Chardonnay
Hills Road
A Request for Approval of a Development Agreement for Final
Tract Maps 23100-1, 23100-2, 23100-3, 231004, 23101-2, 23101-
3, within Specific Plan No. 199.
August 23, 1995
6. Name of Proponent:
BCI/CCL
,
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
2010 Main Street, Suite 960
Irvine, CA 92714
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section III)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacdments, compaction, or over covering
of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
f. Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion?
g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRP'B78PA95.PC 9125/95 sn '1 ~
Yes Maybe No
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
i. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture
or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage panems, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff?.
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not limited to, temperature,
-dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of Found waters?
g. Change in the quantity of Found waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFR.F~78PA95.PC 9125195 sn ~ 7
Yes Maybe No
,
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
'species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)? __
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of plants? __
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? __
d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop? __
Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthie organisms, and/or insects)? __
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals? __
c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area? __
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals? __
e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels? __
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? __
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations? __
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare? __
Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? __
b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described
in a community or general plan? __
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT\7gPA95.PC 9/25/95 sn 'l ~
Yes Maybe N_9_o
Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal result in:
11.
12.
a,
A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous
substances includes, but is not limited to, pesticides, chemicals,
oil or radiation)?
b,
The use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticicles, chemicals,
or radiation)?
C,
Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population of an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand
for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
14.
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?
C,
Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including
public transportatio. n?
d,
Alterations to present paRems of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
fo
Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT~7SPA95.PC 9/25/95 an ~ 9
Yes Maybe No
b. Police protection? --
c. Schools? --
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? __
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _
f. Other governmental services: _
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? __
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new sources of energy? __
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? __
b. Communications systems? __
c. Water systems? __
d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? __
e. Storm water drainage systems? __
f. Solid waste disposal systems? __
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of '
utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? _
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? __
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic pollutant emissions? __
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? __
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? __
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRF~78PA95.PC 9/25/95 sn
19.
20.
c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impac~ upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities?
Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site?
b. AdverSe physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
c. Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values? .
d. Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPTX78PA95.PC 9/25/95 an 2 1
HI. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Earth
1 .a.d.
No. The project will not result in unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures, destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features
since the project does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the
impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for
Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by Environmental Impact Report 202
prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
1.b.
No. The project will not cause disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of soil,
since the project does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the
impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for
Tract 23 100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report
prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
1 .c.g.
No. The project will not result in change in topography or ground surface relief features, or
modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake since the project does not involve any
construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site
will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation
measures proposed for the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village
Specific Plan.
1 .e.f.
No. The project will not result in an increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off
the site and changes in siltation, deposition or erosion since the project does not involve any
construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site
will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23 100 and 23101 and the mitigation
measures proposed by Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific
1 .h.i.
No. The project will not result in exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes or liquefaction since the General Plan EIR and the Margarita Village Specific Plan
EIR do not identify the site in being in any of these areas. No impacts are anticipated since all
the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval
for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact
Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Air
2.a.
No. The project will not result in the local deterioration of air quality since the project does not
involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction
of this site since all the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the
conditions of approval for Tract No. 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by
the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
R:\STAFFRFr\TgPA95.PC 9/25/95 ~n 22
2.b.c.
No. The project will not create objectionable odors or cause alteration of air movement,
temperature or moisture or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally since the project
does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the
construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and
23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the
Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Water
3.a.c.d.
e.f.g.h.
i.
No. The project will not cause changes in currents or the course or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters, alterations to the course or flow of flood waters, change in the
amount of surface water in any waterbody, discharge into surface waters or in any alterations of
surface water quality, alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters, .change in the
quantity of ground waters, reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water
supplies, or exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding since the
project does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from
the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100
and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared
for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
3.b.
No. This project will not cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff since the project do~s not involve any construction. No impacts are
anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the
conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the
Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Plant Life
4.a.b.d.
No. This project will not change the diversity of species, or number of any native species of
plant, reduce the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants or
reduce the acreage of any agricultural crop since the project does not involve any construction.
No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated
through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures
proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
4.c.
No. This project will not introduce new species of plants since the project does not involve any
landscaping. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site will
be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation
measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village
Specific Plan.
5.a.
No. The project will not cause a change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals since the project does not involve any land alteration. No impacts are anticipated since
R:\STAFFRPT~78PA95.PC 9/2~/95 sn 2~3
all the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of
approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental
Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
5.b.c.
d.c.
No. The project will not cause a reduction in numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals, introduction of new wildlife species into the area, a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals or deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat since the
project does not involve any land alteration. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from
the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100
and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared
for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Noise
6.a.
No. The project will not increase the existing noise levels since the project does not involve any
construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site
will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation
measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village
Specific Plan.
6 .b .c.
No. The project will not expose people to severe noise or vibrations since the project does not
involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction
of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and
the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita
Village Specific Plan.
Light and Glare
No. The project will not cause an increase in light and glare since the project does not involve
any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this
site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the
mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita
Village Specific Plan.
Land Use
8.a.
No. The project will not cause an alteration of the present land use of the area since the project
does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the
construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and
23101 and the mitigation proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita
Village Specific Plan.
8.b.
No. The proposed project will not cause alteration to the future planned land use of this area,
when ultimately developed, as described in the draft General Plan which designates the site as Low
Medium Density Residential since the project does not involve any construction. No impacts are
anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the
conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the
Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
R:\STAFFRFI~7$PAgI.PC 9125195 sn 24
Natural Resources
9.a.b.
No. The project will not result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resources and
depletion of any nonrenewable natural resources when the site is ultimately developed since the
project does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from
the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100
and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared
for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Risk of Upset
lO.a.b.
No. The project will not result in a risk of explosion and/or, the release of hazardous substances,
when the site is ultimately developed since all the impacts from the construction of this site will
be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation
measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village
Specific Plan.
10.c.
No. The project will not result in any interference with an emergency response plan when the site
is ultimately developed since the project does not involve any construction. No impacts are
anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the
conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the
Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Population
I1.
No. This project will not make alterations to the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of
the human population of this area since the project does not involve any construction. No impacts
are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site since all the impacts from
the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100
and 23101 and the mitigation. measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared
for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Homing
12.
No. The project will not affect existing housing and create a demand for new housing since the
project does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from
the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100
and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by'the Environmental Impact Report prepared
for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Transportation/Circulation
13.a.f.
No. The project will not generate dally trips, increase traff|c hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists
or pedestrians since the project does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated
since all the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of
approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental
Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
R:XSTAFFRPT\73PA95.PC 9/25195 sn 25
13.b.c.d.
e.
No. The project will not create additional demand on parking, cause a substantial impact on
existing transportation systems, alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people
and/or goods and alteration to waterbone, rail or air traffic since the project does not involve any
construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site
will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation
measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village
Specific Plan.
Public Services
14.a.b.c.
d.e.f.
No. The project will not have a substantial impact on fire protection, police protection, schools,
parks and other governmental services since the project does not involve any construction. No
impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated
through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures
proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Enerlev
15.a.b.
No. The project will not result in substantial use of fuel or energy since the project does not
involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the construction
of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and
the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita
Village Specific Plan.
Utilities
16.a.b.c.
d.e.f.g.
No. The project will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to any of the
following: power or natural gas, communication systems, water systems, sanitary sewer systems,
storm water drainage systems, solid waste disposal systems and will not result in a disjointed or
inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above since the project
does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts from the
construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and
23101 and the mitigation proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita
Village Specific Plan.
Human Health
17.a.
No. The project will not create potential health hazards when the site is ultimately developed since
the project does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the impacts
from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract
23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report
prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
R:~.~TAFFRPTN78PA95.PC 9/25/95 m 26
17.b.
No. The project will not expose people to potential health hazards, including the exposure of
sensitive receptors such as hospitals and schools to toxic pollutant emissions since the project does
not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the .impacts from the
construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and
23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the
Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Aesthetics
18.a.b.c.
No. The project will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public,
the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view, or in a detrimental visual impact
on the surrounding area since the project does not involve any construction. No impacts are
anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the
conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the
Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Recreation
19.
No. The project will not result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
resources or opportunities since the project does not involve any construction. No impacts are
anticipated since all the impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the
conditions of approval for Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the
Environmental Impact Report prepared 'for the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
Cultural Resources
20.a.b.c.
d.
No. The project will not result in alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archeological or historic site, adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure or object, any potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values, or restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact
area since the project does not involve any construction. No impacts are anticipated since all the
impacts from the construction of this site will be mitigated through the conditions of approval for
Tract 23100 and 23101 and the mitigation measures proposed by the Environmental Impact Report
prepared for the Margarita'Village Specific Plan.
R:\STAFFRPT\78PA95.1W3 9/25/95 sn 27
IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal
species, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehiswry?
Yes Maybe No
X
Does the project have the potential to achieve short
ten, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals? (A short term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
X
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is significant.)
X
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
R:\STAFFRPT~7gPA95.PC 9/25/95 sn ~2~
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and
in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will
mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I .find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Prepared by:
Signature
Saied Naaseh. Associate Planner
Name and Title
August 23. 1995
Date
R:\STAFFR.PT~75PA95.PC 9125195 ~n 29
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
FOR THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
SEPTEMBER 12, 1995
R:\STAFFRPT~78PA9~.PC 9/25/95 an 30
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
R:\STAFFRPT~78PA9S.PC 9125195
CCL CONSTRUCTION,
S~bc~ 21,199~
Anthony I Elmo
Chief Building Official
Ciz~ of Tem. e~n- Bui]din~ Dept-
43174 Busincsm Park Drive
Temecula, California 92.590
~ Mr. Elmo:
Productio~ Slab Pour gannot slan until th~ T~-Is Court is poured fm~ Framing
Inspection is oomplCad on th~ Pool Equipme Building on or abou~ Octolaf 9.
rrsming ~nsp.sotions for pudu~ion uniU cannot sma tm'dl a Ceni~caxe of
Occupancy is isnzed for the Recreational site on or about December 10, 1995.
Pl~sse contact me if these dates meet with your approval or if you need any further information.
My phone nmnber is C714) 5534214 ext.
Sinn~ly,
CCL ConsU, uction, In~.
Charles W, Kluger
Director o f
2010 MAIN STREET, SUrf'E: ~4~). IRVINE. CA 92714 714 55~-321.4 FAX: 714 253-7728
I,J~, # 703642
B2/1111995 B4:33 714-253-7728 CCL CO~'I'RU~II3N P~ B3
CC~~IklC,.
COII~"RUCTION SCHEDULE · ~rATtJ~
CHARIX)IINAY 14LLI
NAI ~A I, iAf ~A
NA ~A ~A ~A
~A N/A ~A
~A ~A ~A
~A ~A N/A ~A
~A ~A ~A
16,.,Oct.-.P5
18-0,ct-g5
16-Oct-H,
.17-.O~-e6
I&.4:)cI-GS
23-Oct-aS
2E-Od-~.
21'-0ct...94
27-Oct-ge
21-Ocl-eS
27-Oct-e5
3t,,Od..66
Ol.-Hgv-e6
22-Sep46
22-SeXeS
11-Od-H
t2-0d-~
18-Od-~
31-ocl,e5
3~-0~e5
31-.0d-05
31-0c,46
-"1-0d.4~
31~
02-Nw.H
IO-NOV-~6
15-NOV-e5
IS.Nov-e6
20-NOrmS
2044ov-~
21-P/v46
Z2-Nov-e6
22-Nov-aS
ZT-NOv-86
27-Nov-e5
28-hkN-t5
2S-Nov-M
'.3Q-Nov-Q5
WEEKiu:A!~
TOTAL TO DAT!:
CODE
82/11/1995 84:33 714-253-7728 CCL G]'.IS'T'B. ICTZGH PA~ B4
pfIDJECT IUFER~NI'IENDENT.'
C~L COI, G'TI~CrKN¢,
CONSTRUCT'ION IICHED ULE · rrATU8
CHARDONNAY HIL.L.~
Itac,rmtondlkMiB~'Mtil&lBiddmlL,~
OPJglNAL SCHEDULE DA~rIJ ACTUAL ] Compkml t shut I
PI~-VIOU~Y CX:2MPI.ETfD
pFEVIOU~Y COM~
PREVIOUSLY COM:'LETED
PREVIOU~Y
N/A N/A
IBEVlI~33DAl'Zl
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 5
R:%STAtz~=~gq~78PA95.PC 9/2~/95 sn 32
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
EXHIBITS
R:XSTAFFILPT~78PA95.PC 9/25/95 sn 33
CITY OF TEMECULA
. \ /
li
.R'F~
CASE NO. - PA95-0078 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACTS 23100 and 23101
EXHIBIT- A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - OCTOBER 2, 1995
R:\STAFFRPT\TgPA95.PC 9/25/95 sn
ITEM 30
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Ron Bradley, City Manager
November'l 4, 1995
Renaming of Temecula Library
PREPARED BY:
Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize staff to request that the County
Board of Supervisors rename the Temecula Library the "Temecula-Murrieta Library."
DISCUSSION: During the October 27, 1995 Library Task Force Committee meeting,
Councilmember Walsh from the Murrieta City Council expressed his concerns in his limited
ability to raise funds for the Temecula Library. He stated that it was increasingly difficult to
gain support for the library from Murrieta residents due to the library being named the
"Temecula Library."
Based on extensive discussions, the Committee unanimously agreed that the library should be
renamed as the "Temecula-Murrieta Library," particularly since approximately 35% of the
patronage is from the City of Murrieta. During the discussions, County Library Administrator
Greg McDonald added that the name of "Temecula Library" was applied more for identification
purposes, and that no formal i~roceedings had been conducted in the naming of the library.
He also stated that in order for the library to 'be renamed, the Committee should address a
letter tO the Chairman of the County Board of Supervisors requesting the name change. The
Committee agreed that the letter should be jointly signed by Mayor Stone of the City of
Temecula and Councilmember Walsh of the City of Murrieta. Mr. McDonald will ensure that
the letter is added to the earliest Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda possible.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachment: Minutes of the Temecula-Murrieta Library Task Force Committee
Meeting of Friday October 27, 1995
MINUTES OF TEMECULA-MURRIETA LIBRARY TASK FORCE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF FRIDAY OCTOBER 27, 1995
ATTENDEES:
Jeff Stone
Kevin Walsh
Ron Roberrs
Barbara Tooker
Mary Jane McLarney
Greg McDonald
Marginia Kelly
Ron Stump
Grace Mellman
Allie Kuhns
· The meeting commenced at 9:03 a.m. in the Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room.
· A presentation was made by Ms. Barbara Steffey to Grace Mellman for Friends of the
Library. Over $1,600 was raised during a recent fashion show at the Silver Spoon, and the
proceeds have been donated to the Friends of the Library to apply towards the library.
· Allie Kuhns reviewed the library research conducted to date. Areas discussed included the
accumulation of property values for those parcels located in the Temecula and Murrieta
spheres of influence; property values for those parcels located in areas which could
reasonably be served by the Temecula-Murrieta Library; County Free Library Budget to
Actual Expenditures; and the five options available for the library.
· Mayor Stone provided an update from the League of Cities Conference. Specifically, he
mentioned the City of Davis setting up a Services Benefit District, which imposed a special
assessment that was taken to' the voters in the District and approved by 83 % vote. Mayor
Stone suggested that the Committee to educate the population and encourage citizen
participation in library issues.
· Councilmember Walsh reminded the Committee that at the initial meeting, the consensus
had been to refer to the library as the "Temecula-Murrieta Library." He explained that the
stigma of the library being named the "Temecula Library" has posed a roadblock to his fund
raising efforts. The committee unanimously agreed that the library should be renamed the
"Temecula-Murrieta Library." In order to make the formal change, a letter must be
prepared for the Board of Supervisors, requesting that the change be made. Greg McDonald
added that the present name was assigned for identification purposes only, and that no formal
selection had taken place to name the library when it opened; consequently, he sees no
reason why the name change would be a problem. As far as signage and other identifications
are concerned, the Committee suggested a gradual change so the expenses associated with the
change can be spread out.
· Ron Stump suggested that with respect to the options available, that the Committee
consider the option of contracting services from the County. This can be implemented by
July 1996 if the Committee decides to take this route by January 1996. This option will also
allow the two cities to work together, but will also leave the City of Murrieta the option of
opening its own library and making the break easier if this is the case. Ron also provided an
update of the services offered at the library. Current patronage is approximately 29,000 per
month. Although layoffs have occurred, the only affected area is the reference librarian
service. This loss of personnel is mitigated. though. through "self-help" programs which
instruct patrons on how to use library facilities effectively. Library KIOSK's will also
enhance citizens' ability to access library resources. Ron suggested that the foundation for a
second library facility in the City of Murrieta be laid at this point. Councilmember Walsh
added that there are currently plans for a "Murrieta Library." to be located in Murrieta's Old
Town. Drawings are available at Murrieta City Hall.
· Grace Mellman suggested as pan of the "self-help" priDgram that flyers be available at the
reference desk to assist patrons in using library facilities. Ron Stump responded that there
are several tools currently available.
· During the discussion portion of the meeting, the general consensus was to focus the
research on: 1) Contracting Services
2) Joint Powers Agreement
3) Independent Library District
Allie Kuhns suggested that if the Committee is seriously looking at option 2 or. 3 above, then
since it takes approximately one year to implement these options, the Committee might
consider option 1 as a temporary measure to take the library through FY1996-97, until one
of the other options can be implemented.
· Mayor Stone offered to provide information he received from the League of Cities
Conference concertorig San Marco ballot issues.
· The next meeting is scheduled for Friday December 8, 1995 at 9:00 a.m. in the
Temecula City Hall Conference Room.
· The meeting adjourned at 10:08 a.m.
ITEM 3 1
APPROVAI~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINAN E '
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Financ
November 14, 1995
Community Services Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint two Council members to serve on
an ad hoc subcommittee to review two (2) applications for the FY 1995-96 Community
Services Funding program.
DISCUSSION: On July 3, 1995 the Council approved the appointment of two ad hoc
subcommittee members to review the funding requests for the Community Services Funding
Program 1995-96. Those committee members were Councilmember Birdsall and Mayor Pro
Tem Lindemans. The review and recommendations were brought to Council on September
12, 1995. At that time the committee awarded $92,500 to 17 community service
organizations. However, since that time the City has received two (2) more applications for
funding.
Staff is requesting that the City Council select two members of the Council to participate in
a one-meeting review of these applications. The committee will be dissolved upon completion
of the review process.