HomeMy WebLinkAbout112895 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
this meeting. please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior
to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that
meeting I28 CFR 35.102.35.104ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
NOVEMBER 28, 1995- 7:00 PM
5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council/Temecula Redevelopment Agency pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.8 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR,
Property: Advanced Chemill Systems. 41740 Enterprise Circle North; Negotiating pa~es:
Redevelopment Agency of Temecula and Disp0Med; Under negotiation:" Owner Participation
Agreement
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding
Reverend Lyle Peterson, Hope Lutheran Church
Councilmember Birdsall
Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 95-14
Resolution: No. 95-97
R:~,genda\l 12896 I
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on 1;he Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak" form should be filled out
and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995.
3
Resolution AODrOvina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
R:%AOenda~l 12896 2
4
5
Destruction of Records Reouest
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
City Treasurer's Reoort as of AuQust 31.1995
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1995.
6
7
8
Parcel MaD 28223
(Located north of Winchester Road and west of Diaz Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve Parcel Map 28223, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
Completion and Acceotance of the Parkview Site RouQh Gradin~ Imorovements. Project
No. PW93-09
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Accept the Parkview Site Rough Grading Improvements, Project No. PW93-09, as
complete;
7.2 Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond,
and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
7.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
.of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Substitute A~reement and Bonds for Traffic Si~nalization Mitigation Fees in Parcel Maps
No. 23561-1 and 23561-2
(East .of Jefferson Avenue, North of Santa Gertrudis Creek)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Accept the substitute agreement and bond for Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees in
Parcel Maps No. 23561-1 and 23561-2;
8.2 Authorize the release of the Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee bond on file;
8.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developers and sureties.
R:'~Oendat%1 I 2896 3
9
Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Monument Bonds in Tract
No. ~715-1
(Southwesterly of intersection of Rancho CalifOrnia Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material
bonds for Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the
Subdivision monumentation Bond in Tract No. 22715-1;
9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
Developer, and the Surety.
10
Award of Contract for the Walcott Corridor, Project PW 94-10
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Award a contract for the construction of the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 to
Hemet Manufacturing Companyu, Inc., dba Genesis Construction for
$1,716,637.50and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
10.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders, not to exceed the
contingency amount of $171,663.75 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
10.3 Adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the
Walcott Corridor Project.
11
Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Monument bonds in Tract
No. ~2715-2
(Northwesterly of the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Authorize the release of Faithful Performance and Labor and Material bonds for
Street, and Water and Sewer Improvements, and the Subdivision Monumentation
Bond in Tract No. 22715-2;
11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
Developer, and the Surety.
R:~l~enda~l 128e6 4
12
Acceotance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No.
22715-2, and 22715-F)
(Northwesterly of intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho Vista Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 22715-2AND 22715-F)
13
Release Faithful Performance Warrantv. Labor and Material. and Monument Bonds in Tract
No. 22715-F
(Northwest corner of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material
bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision
Monument bond in Tract No. 22715-F;
13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
Developer and the Surety.
14
Release Faithful Performance Warranty. Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract
No. 22716-1
(Southwesterly of intersection of Rancho California road at Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material
bonds for Street, Water, and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision
Monumentat(on Bond, in Tract No. 22716-1;
14.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
Developer and the Surety.
R:~&Oenda\l 12896 6
15
Release Faithful Performance Warrantv. Labor and Materials. and Monument Bonds in Tract
No. 22716-3
(Northwesterly of intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material
bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision
Monumentation Bond, in Tract No. 22716-3;
15.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
Developer and the Surety.
16
Acceotance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tract No.
22716-3)
(Northeasterly of intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 22716-3)
17
Final Tract Mao No. 24131-3
(Located westerly of Meadows Parkway, between McCabe Drive and Leena Way)
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 24131-3 subject to the Conditions of Approval.
18
Award a Contract to Reconstruct Three (3) Desiltinq Ponds in the Santiaao Channel from
Valleio Avenue to John Warner Road
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Award a contract for construction of three (3) desilting ponds in Santiago Channel
to Monteleone Excavating, the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of
$11,550.00.
R:~ende%112886 8
19
2O
21
Exchange of Real Property between the City of Temecula and the New Community
Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Direct the City Attorney to review the escrow instructions and when satisfactory,
the Mayor to sign the Grant Deed to convey the City property to the New
Community Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod.
Community Services Fundina Reauests
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Approve the ad hoc subcommittee's recommendation for Community Services
Funding requests by Temecula Valley National Little League (TVNLLJ in the amount
of $2,500 and TEAM Community Pantry in the amount of $5,000.
Plannina AppliCatiOn No. 95-0078. Develooment Aareement for BCI/CCL
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BCIICCL
VENTURE NO. I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, PLANNING AREA 14, MARGARITA
VILLAGE, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0078
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING,
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING,
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING
OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT -AUTHORITY
R:~end~112896 7
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
President Ronald H. Roberts
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 95-01
Resolution: No. CSD 95-07
Lindemanso Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an
item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to
Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your
name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
2 Naming of a Newly AcQuired Park Site
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Name the newly acquired park site "The Duck Pond".
R:'LAgende~l 12896 8
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:'v~ende%l 12896 8
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING'
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 95-01
Resolution: No. RDA 95-08
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
ROLL CALL:
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment
Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not
listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should
be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
bef0r~ the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995.
2
Revision to the Facade Improvement Rebate Prooram
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the revision to the Facade Improvement Rebate Program.
R:~Agend~112896 10
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the Redevelopment Agency before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City
Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
3 Professional Hosoital SuDolv Owner Particioation Ac~reement
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Open the public hearing and continue it to the meeting of December 12, 1995.
AGENCY BUSINESS
4 Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Consider approval of an RDA small business loan to the Health Zone (natural/health
food store) to b~ located at the Temecula Plaza, Ynez and Solana Way.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December. 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:%A~ende~l 12896 11
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
Next in Order:
Resolution No.: No. FA 95-06
CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2).minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda a pink "Request
To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION: '
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, '1995.
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising 0nly those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
2 Financino for Old Town Area Public Imorovements and the Western Bvoass Corridor
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Continue the four (4) Public Hearings listed below to the meeting of December 12,
1995:
CFD I Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes
CFD 2 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes
CFD I Intention to Incur bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 1
CFD 2 Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 2
R:~.gendYd 128~6 12
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
Ft:~4ende%I 12896 13
·
CALL TO ORDER: President Particle H. Birdall
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC CONHVIENTS
Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdnil
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda 'a pink 'Request
To.Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutf~s
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995.
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:%A0e~cle%112896 14
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
22 Draft Develooment Code
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Open the public hearing and receive public testimony;
22.2 Adopt a Negative Declaration;
22.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING
CERTAIN GENERAL PLAN LAND AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA
GENERAL PLAN
22.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING
'THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CONSISTENCY ZONING MAP AND AMENDING
THE 'ZONING MAP OF THE CITY TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:%Aeend8%112696
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\l 12886
ITEM
1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD NOVEMBER 14, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:04 PM at the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor
Pro Tem Karel Lindemans presiding.
PRESENT: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks,
Roberrs
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City
Clerk June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:38 PM. It was
moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to adjourn to
Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: 27500
Jefferson Avenue. Negotiating parties: Temecula Redevelopment Agency, Jan Weilert RV
and Donna L. Reeves Trust, Under negotiation: lease terms - term and payment.
2. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Assessor's
Parcel No. 921-740-001, Murrieta Creek south of Winchester Road; Assessor's Parcel No.
921-280-013, Murrietta Creek south of Rancho California Road. Negotiating parties: City
of Temecula, KRDC and Riverside County Flood Control District; Under negotiation: terms
and payment.
3. §54956.9, CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL, EXISTING LITIGATION, Indian Child
Welfare, et al v. City of Temecula; Copeland vo City of Temecula et. al.
4. §54956.9(b), CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL, ANTICIPATED LITIGATION,
significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b), two
cases.
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent.
r:\minutes\l 11495
-1-
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Robert Cash, Shepherd's Footsteps International
Ministry.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Roberts.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Assemblyman Bruce Thompson addressed the City Council and offered his support in
assisting the City with local issues. Mayor PrO Tem Lindemans invited Assemblyman
Thompson to join the Council on the dias to hear Item No. 8 regarding Library Funding.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Larry Rinehart, representing South Coast Air. Quality Management District, gave a brief
update on the District and distributed information packets to the Council.
Kay Cassaro, 31616 Paseo Goleta, addressed the City Council requesting the Overland
Overpass be expedited and not put off in favor of Rancho California Overpass
improvements.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans removed Item 8 from the consent calendar and hearing no
objections, reordered the agenda to take Item 8 out of order.
8. Resolution Statinq the City'of Temecula's Commitmentto Library Funding
Senior Management Analyst Allie Kuhns presented the staff report:
Assemblyman Thompson stated he would like to look at cuts to other services and
see how the library relates.
Councilmember Birdsall stated that without the financial assistance of the City of
Temecula, the City of Murrieta and the County of Riverside, the hours at the
Temecula Library would have been seriously reduced. She also advised that these
funding supplements provide only for a short-term solution.
Assemblyman Thompson informed the Council that no money will be allocated by
the State until July I st.
-2-
r:\minutes%111495
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
STATING THE COMMITMENT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO RECOVER
STATE LIBRARY FUNDING WHICH HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent.
Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans thanked Assemblyman Bruce Thompson for his visit and
concern for local issues.
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Clerk June Greek announced staff has requested that Item 28 be continued to the
meeting of November 28, 1995.
Councilmember Parks asked if FY94-96 should be corrected to FY 95-96 on Items 14 and
15. Staff will make any necesary corrections.
Councilmember Parks registered an abstention on Item 2.3 and Item 11.
Councilmember Roberts requested the removal of Item No. 21 from the Consent Calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-7, 9-20 and 22-27, with Councilmember Parks abstaining on
Items 2.3 and 11 and Item No. 28 will be continued to the meeting of November 28,
1995.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
1 COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
1.1
Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs
None
Stone
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
r:\minutes\l 11495 -3-
Minutes
2.1 Approve the minutes of October 10, 1995.
2.2 Approve the minutes of October 12, 1995.
2.3 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995.
Councilmember Parks abstained on 2.2.
Resolution ADOrovina List of Demands
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Destruction of Records Reouest
4.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City
of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
Out-of-State Travel
5.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans.
Liability Insurance Renewal
6.1 Approve the City of Temecula Liability Insurance Policy Renewal with
Insurance Company of the West for the period of December 1, 1995 through
December 1, 1996.
Deleaation of Authority in Processing and Settling Claims AQainst City of Temecula
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DELEGATING TO THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY CLERK CERTAIN
POWERS AND AUTHORITY IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS FILED AGAINST
THE CITY
r:~minutee\l 11495 -4-
10.
11.
Acceotance of Public Streets in the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts
No. 20703-3, and 22962) (Southeasterly of Winchester Road, Southerly of Nicolas
ROad)
9.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-3 AND
22962)
Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. 20703-3
10.1
10.2
10.3
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-3;
Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage, and Water
and Sewer Bond amounts and the release of the Subdivision Monumentation
Bond;
Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders, and Direct the City
Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and
surety.
Release Grading Bond for Imoort to School Site
(Southeast of Winchester at Margarita Road Intersection)
-11.1
Authorize release of Grading Bond for Import of Soils to Chapparal High
School Site;
11.2
The motion carried as follows:
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Permittee and Surety.
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
r:\minutes%111495 -5-
12.
13.
14.
15.
Release Public Improvement Warrantv, Labor and Material. and Monument Bonds in
Tract No. 21674-3
(Southwest of intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway)
12.1
Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and
Material bonds for Street, Sewer and Water Improvements, and Subdivision
Monumentation in Tract No. 21674-3;
12.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer.
Release Gradina Bond for Tract No. 21067
(Northerly of Intersection of Pala Road at Loma Linda Road)
13.1 Authorize release of Grading Bond for Tract No. 21067;
13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Solicitation of Construction Bids for FY94-95 Annual Pavement Manaoement
Project. PW95-06
14.1
Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public
Works to solicit public construction bids for FY94-95 Annual Pavement
Management Project No. PW95-06.
Professional Services Aareement with Enaineerina Ventures. Inc. for Rancho
California Road and Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Imorovement Project No. 5
15.1
Award a contract for the design of Rancho California Road and Santa Cecilia
Drive sidewalk improvement project to Engineering Ventures, Inc., for
$10,950.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
15.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $1,095.00 which is equal to. 10% of the contract
amount.
15.3 Authorize a transfer of $9,636.00 of Development Impact Fees (Public
Facilities) to the Capital Projects Fund.
15.4 Appropriate $49,079 in the Capital Projects Fund to Account No. 210-165-
661-5804 for the total costs to complete this project.
16.
Walcott Corridor Reimbursement Aareements with R.C.W.D. for Work Performed
Durina the Construction, Proiect PW94-10
16.1 Approve reimbursement agreement with the Rancho California Water District
for the cost of relocation of certain water improvements made necessary by
the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10.
r:~minutes~l 11495 -6-
17.
18.
Professional Geotechnical Services Contract with Law/Crandall. Inc. for Walcott
Corridor. Proiect PW94-10
17.1
Award a contract for Professional Geotechnical Services for the Walcott
Corridor, Project PW94-10 to Law/Crandall, Inc. for $34,565.00 and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
17.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $3,456.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
Award of Contract for RiQht-Of-Way Weed Control Pre-Emeraent and Post-Emerqent
AppliCations. Project No. PW95-24
18.1
Award a contract for Right-Of-Way Weed Control Pre-Emergent and Post-
Emergent Applications, Project No. PW95-24 to Pestmasters Services of
Temecula in the amount of $25,755.47 and authorize the Mayor to execute
the contract.
18.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $2,575.55 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
19.
Award
19.1
19.2
19.3
of Contract for City Wide Riqht-Of-Way Tree Trimming Proaram
Reverse the decision to award Citywide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program
to Arbor-Pro Tree Service.
Award a contract for Citywide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program to L.
Willlares Landscaping, Inc. for $16,880.00and authorize the Mayor to
execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $1,688.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
20.
Award
20.1
20.2
of Contract for FY95-96 City Wide A.C. Street Repair Project No. PW95-20
Award a contract for FY 95-96 Citywide A.C. Street Repair, Project No.
PW95-20 to Hillcrest ConstrUction in the amount of $57,110.00 and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $5,711.00which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
r:\minutes%111495 -7-
22.
Comoletion and Acceptance of the Rancho Vista/Mira Loma Dr. Sidewalk
ImPrOvements, Proiect No. PW94-19
22.1 Accept the Rancho Vista/Mira Loma Drive Sidewalk Improvements, Project
No. PW94-19, as complete;
22.2
Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the
Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the
amount of 10% of the contract;
22..3 Direct the City Clerk to release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7)
months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
23.
24.
Completion and AcceDtance of the Access Ramos, Project No. PW95~04
23.1
23.2
23.3
Accept the Access Ramps, Project No. PW95-04, as complete;
Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the
Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) years Maintenance Bond in the
amount of 10% of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
"No Parkina" Zones on the East Side of Front Street from SR 79(S) to SantiaQo
Road
24.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT
STREET FROM SR 79(S) TO SANTIAGO ROAD ADJACENT TO ALL
DRIVEWAYS
25.
Award of Construction Contract for Parkview Site Improvement Project, Phase 1,
Fire Station 84- Project No. PW95-09CSD
25.1
Approve the plans and specifications and award a contract for Parkview Site
Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84, Project PW95-09CSD, to
Great West Contractors for the base bid and the two 'alternates in the
amount of $1,970,842.46and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
r:\minutes\l 11495 -8-
26.
25.2
Authorize the Mayor to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $197,084.24which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
Approve Grant of Easements for Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10
26.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-96
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND DRAINAGE
PURPOSES EASEMENTS ON WALCOTT LANE AND LA SERENA WAY
27.
28.
Award
27.1
Award
28.1
28.2
28.3
of Bid for Replacement Network Server for City Hall
Award a bid for the purchase of the replacement network server for City
Hall, Bid Number 95-33 to Inacom Information Systems, San Diego,
California for $37,711.42.
of Contract for the Walcott Corridor. Project PW94-10
Award a contract for the construction of the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-
10 to Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction for
$1,716,637.50and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $171,663.75 which is equal to 10% of the contract
8mount.
Adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program
for the Walcott Corridor Project.
21.
Award of Contract of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. RepairS Project No. PW95-21
Councilmember Roberts asked if there will be 'a problem with numerous change
orders on this contract because it came in so far under the estimate. Public Works
Director Kicak answered that the estimate may have been somewhat inflated and
due to the economy, the contract came in well under the estimate.
Councilmember Parks expressed concern that the roads be maintained properly.
r:\minutes\l 11495 -9-
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
21.1
Award a contract for FY 95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW95-
21 to West Coast Construction in the amount of $38,951.00and authorize
the Mayor to execute the contract.
21.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $3,895.10 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent.
RECESS
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans called a recess at 7:42 PM. The meeting was reconvened
following the Community Services District Meeting, the Redevelopment Agency Meeting,
the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority meeting and the
Old Town Westside Improvement Authority meeting at 7:54 PM.
PUBLIC HEARING
29. Plannine ADDlication No. 95-0078. Develooment Agreement for BCI/CCL
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report and read
a letter into the record from James Horn, a member of the Chardonney
Homeowners Associatio.n Board, expressing his opposition to any reduction in
Development Impact Fees.
Mayor Pro Tern opened the public hearing at 8:10 PM.
Charlie Kluger, 4300 Fir Avenue, Seal Beach, representing BCI/CCL spoke in favor
of staff recommendation and stated the recreation area will be completed in a timely
manner.
'Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans closed the public hearing at 8:11 PM.
r:\minutes\l 11495 -1 O-
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
29.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for PA95-0078;
29.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND BCI/CCL VENTURE
NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, PLANNING
AREA 14, MARGARITA VILLAGE, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0078
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent.
30.
Renamina of Temecula Library
Senior Management Analyst Allie Kuhns presented the staff report.
Councilmember Birdsall expressed concern that this was not going before the
Murrieta City Council for a similar action on that City's behalf.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to
continue this matter to the meeting of December 12, 1995, and to direct that the
.Task Force make the City of Murrieta representatives aware of the Council's
position that the Murrieta City Council should adopt a similar resolution.
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent.
Community Services Fundina Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Finance Director Genie Roberts presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
appoint Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans and Councilmember Birdsall to serve for the
remainder of the year on an ad hoc subcommittee to review two (2) applications for
the FY 1995-96 Community Services Funding program. The motion was
unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
r:\minutes~l 11495 -11-
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson reported on the Closed Session, stating that no action was taken
that requires public reporting.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to adjourn at
8:25 PM to a meeting on November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried
with Mayor Stone absent.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk .
r:\minutes\l 11495 -12-
ITEM 3
RKqOLUTION NO. 9.$-
A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in
the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are
hereby allowed in the mount of $1,525,397.13
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of November, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk'
[SEAL]
RetotX87 I
STATE OF CAJ,.IFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, lune S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 28th day of November, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMF, MBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMI=~MBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
l~soa~87 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
/09/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
/16/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
/28/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/16~95 :TOTAL PAYROLL:
55,637.86
150,309.79
1,197,128.75
122,320.73
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR '11/28/95 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL $ 691,322.52
100 GAS TAX 19,105.90
110 RANCHO CALIF ROAD REIMB DIST 0.00
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 0.00
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 0.00
165 RDA-LOWIMOD 4..441.14
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 28, 174.72
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 8.906.02
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 22.210.66
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 5,235.23
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 221 .,54
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 581,932.82
220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST. 0.00
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 0,00
280 RDA-CIP 18,038.99
300 INSURANCE 835.37
310 VEHICLES 0.00
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 14,081.45
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 5,037.52
340 FACILITIES 1,267.55
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 0.00
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE 2,264.97
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL $ 74,661.12
100 GAS TAX 15,377.18
165 RDA-LOWIMOD .456.33
190 TCSD 20,348.61
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 624.70
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 646.52
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,424.82
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 397.47
280 RDA-CIP' 1,900.36
300 INSURANCE 589,25
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,286.24
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 721.35
340 FACILITIES 2,686.78
TOTAL BY FUND:
~REPARED Y'THER~SA~.a~ . HEREBY CERTIFY :HAT THE
~RECTOR OF FINANCE
RONA~D E. BRADLEY, CITY MAh~'~ER (,~
$ 1,525,397.13
$ 1,403,076.40
122,320.73
$ 1,525,397.13
FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
1 '1/09/95
14:44
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE
190 COHMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B '
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
22,895.76
5,011.59
37.08
12,992.14
1,564.47
12.15
2,461.11
33.85
3,851.68
1,168.25
11.95
3,861.46
1,320.05
416.32
55,637.86
VOUCHRE2
11/09/95
"IO*JCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26255
26259
26260
26260
26261
26262
26263
2626~
26265
26265
26265
26266
26266
26266
26266
26266
26266
26266
26266
26266
26267
26268
26269
26269
26270
26271
26272
262T~
26274
2.6274
26275
26276
26276
14:44
CHECK
DATE
11/03/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000905
001674
00194?
001947
002056
001718
000484
000638
000638
000638
000127
000127
000127
000127
000127
000127
000127
000127
000127
001217
000135
001195
001195
001275
000979
001669
00166.9
001313
000165
000165
VENDOR
NAME
TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC
ADKINS, ROBERT STEVEN
AMERIGAS
AMERIGAS
AUTO PARK CAR STEREO &
BARTON, JUDITH
BEJING LONGEVITY, INC.
CALIFORNIA ASSOC LOCAL
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
INC. -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
INC. LLEGA
INC. -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
INC. -LEGA
CENTER FOR CONTINUING S
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
COMPUSERVE, INC.
CORTES, ANTON]A
CROSSLEY, DEBRA
DEL RIO ENTERPRISE
DUNN EDgARDS CORPORATIO
DUNN EDWAPJ)S CORPORATZO
FAGAN, MATTHEW
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TRANSPORT: EXCH-STUDENTS/LAX
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
MOTORCYCLE MAINT
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
TCSD ]NSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ECONOMIC DEV CONF:MJM:11/30-12
3RD QUARTER S.N,I. FEES
3RD QUARTER S.M.l, FEES
3RD QUARTER S.M.I. FEES
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC NOTICES
PUBLIC NOTICES
PUBLIC NOTICES
PUBLIC NOTICES
PUBLIC NOTICES
PUBLIC NOTICES
OVRCHG AD(TOO188514)&OVR PRINT
OVRCHG AD(TOO188514)&OVR PRINT
BOOK:CAL ECONOMIC GROWTH 1995
M/SC, HARDWARE FOR SIGNS
CRC ALARM MONITORING SERVS
SR CENTER ALARM MONITORING
SUBSCRIPTION-COMPUTER MAGAZINE
REFUND-SECURTIY DEPOSIT
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
RESTORATION ON MARGARITA RD
CREDIT:RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT
RECYCLED GRAFFZTI PAINT
CONF:CCAPA 9/30-10/3 M FAGAN
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
'001-100-999-5280
190-183-999-5330
001-162-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
001-170-999-5214
190-18~-4982
190-183-999-5330
001-110-999-5258
001-2280
001-2290
001-162-4229
001-120-999-5256
001-161-501-5256
001-161-502-5256
001-120-~-5256
001-161-501-5256
001-161-502-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-502-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-110-999-SZ28
100-164-601-5244
190-182-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
320-199-999-5228
190-2900
190-183-4982
100-164-601-5401
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
001-161-501-5258
320-1~-9~-5230
190-180-999-5230
ITEM
AMOUNT
400.00
242.40
273.58
265.58
47.50
42.00
76.00
199.00
1,899.33
2°894.42
239.68-
8.52
147.26
153.32
120.03
29.43
298.14
75.56
243.94-
10.45-
210.11
743.26
50.00
45.00
10.25
100.00
20.00
875.00
127.68-
131.67
180.49
20.25
25.00
PAGE I
CHECK
AMOUNT
400.00
242.40
539.16
47.50
42.00
76.00
199.00
4,554.07
575.87
210.11
743.26
95. O0
10.25
100.00
20.00
875. O0
180.49
45
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2
11Z_09/95 14:44
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
262~
262~
26278
26279
26279
26280
26280
26280
26281
26282
26282
26282
26283
26283
26283
26283
~z~83
26284
26284
26285
26285
26285
26285
26285
26286
26287
26288
26289
26290
26291
2.6291
26291
26292
.z~93
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
FLESURAS, MELODY
000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC.
000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC.'
000184
000184
000184,
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, INC.
001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD
001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD
001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000364 GREEK, JUNE S.
000364 GREEK, JUNE S.
000364 GREEK, JUNE S.
000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HARE, PATRICIA
001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE
000962 ] C M A - WASHINGTON
001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
KELLER, DERICC]
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
002023 KING, WENDE
KOBYLSKI, KATY
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PRE-ENPLOYMENT PHYSICAL COSTS
EMPLOYEE EXAMINATION
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MISC. PAINT SUPPLIES
909 695-3539 GEM USAGE
909 699-0128 GEN USAGE
909 699-2309 GEM USAGE
MNTHY ACCESS CHGS 10/28-11/27
RENT FOR CITY YARD/FRONT ST
RENT FOR CITY YARD/FRONT ST
RENT FOR CITY YARD/FRONT ST
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
M1SC OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/20-24
LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/20-24
LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/20-24
'MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS
MAINT SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
MISC SUPPLIES/SPORTS PROGRAM
MA/NTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
EAP SERVICES
ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 1996
CRC POOL CHEMICALS/OCT
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
TEMP HELP W/E 10/29 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/29 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/29 EVANS
TCSD INSTRUCTON EARNINGS
REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-150-999-5248
190-180-999-5250
190-183-4982
190-180-999-5212
100-164-601-5218
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
100-164-601-5234
190-180-999-5234
001-162-999-5234
190-182-999-5220
190-182-999-5220
190-182-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-120-999-5258
001-1170
001-1170
190-180-999-5212
340-199-999-5212
190-183-999-5380
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-183-4982
001-150-999-5250
001-110-999-5226
190-182-999-5212
190~183-4982
001-165-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
100-164-604-5118
190-183-999-5330
190-2900
ITEM
AMOUNT
90.00
45.00
42.00
151.40
1.57
35.55
1,021.90
28.75
350.00
440,00
352.00
88.00
37.71
87.81
10.56
260.85
77.92
106.00
23.73
23.73-
51.66
51.23
73.15
496.13
409.55
42.00
338.35
878.62
277.46
42.00
94.03
94.03
94.04
448.00
100.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
135.00
42.00
152.97
1,086.Z0
350.00
880. O0
474.85
106.00
1,081.72
42.00
338.35
878.62
277.46
42.00
282.10
448.00
100.00
VOUCHREZ
11/09/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26294
26295
26296
26297
26298
26299
26300
26301
2~02
26302
26302
26302
26303
26304
26304
26304
26304
26305
26306
26306
26306
26307
26308
26309
26310
26310
26310
26310
26310
26310
26311
26311
26311
26311
14:44
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11109/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11209/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
001329 KOHLHOAS, JEANETTE
000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC.
001607 L D D S COMMUNICATIONS,
001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV
001973 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI
00038~ LAW/CRANDALL~ INC.
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
001290 MEYER, JOHN
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001868 MIYAMOTO, SUSAN
001892 MOBILE MODULAR
001892 MOBILE MODULAR
001892 MOBILE MODULAR
001892 MOBILE MODULAR
000587 MUNOZ, MARION.
002118 NAASEH-SHAHRY, SAIED
002118 NAASEH-SHAHRY, SAIED
002118. NAASEH-SHAHRY, SAIED
001676 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS,
000235 0 C B REPROGRAPHICS, IN
002100 OBJECT RADIANCE
000239
000239
000239
0002.:39
000239
000239
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
001561
001561
001561
001561
PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR
PAGENET -PAG]NG NETWOR
PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR
PAGENET; PAGING NETt40R
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
[TEM
DESCRIPTION
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
LONG DISTANCE CHARGES
ELECTION LAg SEMINAR:GREEK
BALLFIELD LIGHT REPAIRS
PROF SERVS-WINCHESTER RD
TENP HELP W/E 10/29 LIPOSCHAK
COMF:CA MAIN ST 9/13-15 MEYER
BUSINESS CARDS FOR EMPLOYEES
BUSINESS CARDS FOR EMPLOYEES
TAX
TAX
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
LEASE PAYMENT FOR INTERIM FIRE
TAX
LEASE PAYMENT FOR INTERIM FIRE
TAX
OLD TO~N TRASH MAINTENANCE
CORF:LEAGUE CAL CITIES/NAASEH
CONF:LEAGUE CAL C[TIES/NAASEH
CONF:LEAGUE CAL C[TIES/NAASEH
DISPATCH RADIOS MOBILE SERVS
BLUEPRINTS REPROGRAPH[CS SERVS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TENP HELP W/E 10/08 GRAGE
TEMP HELP 14/E 10/08 GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 10/08 GRAGE
TENP HELP W/E 10/15 GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 10/15 GRAGE
TENP HELP W/E 10/15 GRAGE
PAGING SERVICES/OCT
PAGING SERVICES/OCT
PAGING SERVICES/OCT
PAGING SERVICES/OCT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-999-5330
100-164-601-5218
320-199-999-5208
001-120-999-5261
190-180-999-5212
210-165-6~1-5804
100-164-601-5118
001-161-501-5261
001-161-501-5222
001-161-502-5222
001-161-501-5222
001-161-502-5222
190-183-999-5330
001-171-999-5470
001-171-999-5470
001-171-999-5470
001-171-999-5470
001-163-999-5250
001-161-501-5258
001-161-502-5258
001-1170
320-199-999-5209
Z10-190-626-5802
190-183-999-5330
001-162-999-5118
001-161-501-5118
001-161-502-5118
001-'162-999-5118
001-161-501-5118
001-161-502-5118
320-199-999-5238
001-100-999-5250
001-162-999-5238
001-120-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
112.00
149.41
1,348.24
189.00
244.50
1,100.00
634.40
100.69
248.89
95.36
13.32
13.32
156.80
905.00
70.14
685. O0
53.09
376.00
105.61
105.60
3.00t
98~. 00
172.77
369.60
291.60
73.60
73.60
291.60
75.60
14.68
15.00
30.00
7.50
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
112.00
149.41
1,348.24
189.00
24~.50
1,100.00
634.40
100.69
370.89
156.80
1,713.23
376.00
208.21
984.00
172.77
369.60
885.60
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 4
112P9/95 14:44
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NLINBER
26311
26311
26311
26311
26311
26312
26313
26314
26314
26314
26314
26314
26314
26314
26314
26314
26314
26314
"~15
5
26316
26317
26318
26319
26319
26319
26319
26319
26319
26319
26320
26321
26322
-2~323
26324
26324
CHECK
DATE
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
.11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001561
001561
001561
001561
001561
001243
000733
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
001960
001960
000254
000270
000947
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000426
000418
000271
002112
000873
000873
VENDOR
NAME
PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR
PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR
PAGENET - PAGING NETt~3R
PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR
PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR
PALMQUIST, MARY
PARTY PZAZZ
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
POWAY HONDA KAWASAKI
POWAY HONDA KAWASAKI
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R
ROBERT BEIN, kIN FROST &
ROBERT J LUNG & ASSOCIA
ROBERTS, RORALD H.
ROBERTS, RORALD H.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
]TEN
DESCRIPTION
PAGING SERVICES/OCT
PAGING SERVICES/OCT
PAGING SERVICES/OCT
PAGING SERVICES/OCT
PAGING SERVICES/OCT
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
RENTAL ORDER FOR TABLES/CHAIRS
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE
MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE
RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING
OCT PROF SERVS-PRK~HEW/PAUBA R
BLUE PRINTS FOR NEW CITY HALL
01-02-45005-2 SPT PRK WTR SERV
WATER SERV
WATER SERV
WATER SERV
WATER SERV
WATER SERV
WATER SERV
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
WEED ABATEMENT LIENS RELEASES
PROF SRVCS: WALCOTT CORRIDOR
PHOTO OF 1ST STREET
LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/20-24
LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/20-24
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5250
001'163'999'5Z50
100-16~-601-5238
001-165-999'5238
001-170-999'5242
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5301
001-140-999-5258
190-180-999-5260
100-164-601-5218
190-183-999-5320
190-18S-999-5320
001-150-999-5250
001-171-999-5296
001-150-999-5260
001-110-999-5260
100-164-604-5220
001-110-999-5260
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-150-999-5254
210-190-626-5802
210-199-650-5804
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
340-199-999-5240
340-199-999-5212
001-162-999-5440
210-165-637-5802
280-199-807-5802
001-100-999-5258
001-1170
ITEM
AMOUNT
75.00
15.00
15.00
7.50
30.00
38~.80
142.23
37.20
7.85
2.47
36.14
29,08
10.00
40.77
32.00
25.00
26.93
28.95
251.64
282.80
299.94
350.00
109.91
6.85
3,029.15
138.60
1,344.16
211.56
2,224.53
9.28
46.55
30.00
724.0O
199.95
136.28
3.00-
CHECK
AMOUNT
209.68
384.80
142.23
276.39
534.44
299.94
350.00
109.91
6,964.13
46.55
30.00
724.00
199.95
133.28
.)-EG25 11/09/95 001942 s C SIGNS POSTING FOR SIGNS/CURRENT PLAN 001-161-501-5256 465.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
11/09195 14:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ZTEH ACCOUNT
NUNHER DATE NUNBER NANE DESCRIPTION NUNHER
ITEN
ANOUNT
CHECK
AHOUNT
26325 11/09/95 001942 S C SIGNS POSTING OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTI 001-120-999-5244
26325 11/09/95 001942 S C SIGNS NOTICE TNS LIGHTING-POSTING 001-120-999-5244
26325 11/09/95 001942 S C SIGNS NOTICE LiEN FOR NUISANCE ABATE 001-120-999-5244
26325 11/09/95 001942 S C SIGNS TZBG NOTICE-POSTING 001-120-999-5244
130.00
65.00
65.00
260.00
985.00
26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-163-999-5262
26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, ]NC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-999-5262
26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, ]NC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-110-999-5262
26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-526~
26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CiTY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263
26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262
26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 100-164-601-5263
134.38
45.53
34.85
175.46
106.04
83.20
413,02
992.48
26327 11/09/95 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL NAINT 9 ELENENTARY SCHOOL 190-180-999-5212
145.40
145.40
26328 11/09/95 000926 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON RELOCATE GUY WIRES ON YNEZ 001-1280
3,260.37
3,260.37
26329 !1/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - ELECT SERVS 191-180-999-5319
26329 11/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON- 2-02-351~5836 VIA OEL CORONADO 193-180-999-5240
26329 11/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-351-6073 VIA'RIO TMCULA 193-180-999-5240
26329 11/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-351-6420 VIA COROOBA IRRG 190-180-999-5240
1,262.14
15.95
15.95
140.38
1,434.42
26330 11/09/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-205-4070/MJM/OCT 001-110-999-5208
26330 11/09/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 312-0474 EOC 320-199-999-5208
26330 11/09/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 205-4070 MJM-OVRCHG 001-110-999-5208
184.39
15.74
25.97-
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI WORKERS# CONP-OCT/95 001-2370 4,322.32
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANC] WORKERS' CONP-OCT/95 100-2370 1,484.83
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUNO- SAN FIL~NCI WORKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 165-2370 37.08
26331 1'1/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI ~K)RKERS' CONP-OCT/95 190-2370 1,965.20
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI WORKERS' CONP-OCT/95 191-2370.
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI WORKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 192-2370 12.15
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANC] WORKERS# CONP-OCT/95 193-2370 204.68
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI gORKERS~ CONP-OCT/g5 194-2370 33.85
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI WORKERS# CONP-OCT/95' 280-2370 108.30
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUNO- SAN FRANCI WORKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 300-2370 11.95
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI t4ORKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 320-2370 32.12
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI WORKERS' COIqP-OCT/95 330-2370 13.64
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUNO- SAN FRANCI WORKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 340-2370 309.26
26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI t~3RKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 001-1182
8,703.67
26332 11/09/95 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS CRC WINDO~ REPAIR
190-182-999-5212
127.50
127.50
26333.11/09/95 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION 190-180-999-5301
~-26334 11/09/95 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & TCSD IqA[NT. AND REPAIR OF PARK 190-180-999-5212
50.85
610.32
50.85
610.32
26335 11/09/95 000316 THORNHILL, C~RY :CCAPA CONF:9/29-10/3 001-161-501-5258
26335 11/09/95 000316 THORNHILL, GARY .:CCAPA CONF:9/29-10/3 001-161-502-5258
· 26336 11/09/95 002111 TOGO'S NEGOTIATIOR TRAI~ING LUNCH 001-110-999-5261
14.01
14.00
71.50
28.01
71--rd3
VOUCHRE2
11 / 09/95
VOucHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26337
26337
26337
26337
26338
26339
26340
26341
26341
26342
26342
14:44
CHECK
DATE
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
11/09/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000320
.000320
000320
000320
002117
001944
002016
000326
000326
000345
000345
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VENDOR ITEM
NAME DESCRIPTION
TOgNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES
TOgNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES
TONNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES
TiE CENTER STATIONERS, OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRADE &CONMERCE AGENCY TRADE SHOW PARTICIPATION FEE
TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, IN PROS SVCS SIGNAL DESIGN
TSUTSUNIDA & ASSOCIATES NEW CITY HALL SPACE PLANNING
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNIFORM NAINT/PUBLIC WORKS
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNIFORM NAINT, FOR TCSD
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI METER USAGE FRON 9/26-10/26
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI LEASE FOR COPIER ~ CRC
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-164-604-5220
100-16/,-604-5220
100-164-604-5220
100-164-604-5220
280-199-999-5264
210-165-659-5804
210-199-650-5804
100-164-601-5243
190-180-999-5243
330-199-999-5239
190-182-999-5239
ITEM
AMOUNT
56.57
13.T3-
4.49
56.34
860.00
870.00
525.00
24.00
50.02
1,306.41
117.84
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
103.67
860.00
870.00
525.00
74.02
1,424.25
TOTAL CHECKS
55,637.86
VOUCHRE2
11/16195
14:55
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOI,//MO0 SET ASIDE
190 CONMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
49,414.06
8,839.31
917.7'3
15,182.58
7,541.55
22,198.51
2,774.12
-187.69
37,633.64
872.52
823.42
2,572.33
701.10
851.23
150,309,79
VOUCHRE2
11/16/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26343
26344
26345
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
576714
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
580657
14:55
CHECK
DATE
11/14/95
11/15/95
11/15/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11116195
11/16/95
11/16/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000314
001432
002120
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
00028;3
000283
000283
00028~
000283
000283
00028~
000283
00028~
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
00044~+
000444
000444
000444
000444
000~
00044~
VENDOR
NAME
TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM
PUBLIC SERVICE SKILLS,
PALACE STATION
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FXRSTAX (ZRS)
FXRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FXRSTAX (XRS).
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (XRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EOD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
DRAW #6 FOR MUSEUM
CONF:HONOCZDE INVEST/ANTORIADZ
HOTEL:HUMOCIDE INVEST/ANTONIAD
000283 FEDERAL
00028~ FEDERAL
00028,:3 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEOERAL
000283 FEOERAL
000283 MEOICARE
000283 MEOICARE
000283 NEOXCARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
- 000283 MEOZCARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDXCARE
000283 MEDZCARE
000283 MEDZCARE
000283 MEDZCARE
000283 MEDXCARE
000444 SDI
000444 SOl
000444 SDI
000444 SOl
000444 SOl
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
0004~4 STATE
O004J,~ STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
O004~J,- STATE
00(34~' STATE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-190-808-5804
001-170-999-5261
001-170-999-5261
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
193-2070
280-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
ITEM
AMOUNT
3,921.64
495. O0
263.99
11,883.82
2,740.97
30.31
2,792.36
93.64
75.57
418.42
76.17
202.00
129.76
371.27
115.94
238.17
2,765.51
571.56
14.62
733.12
21.68
24.64
87.44
14.57
65.84
22.43
6O.72
25.32
89.75
55.09
10.12
43.78
6.65
8.67
3,207.89
673.54
9.28
666.66
18.13
9.57
100.51
16.55
35.01
38.79
93.45
22.96
36.45
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,921.64
495.00
263.99
23,665.58
5,053
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2
11~!6/95 14:55
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26348
26349
26350
26350
26350
26351
26351
26351
26352
26352
26353
26354
26354
26355
26355
~-z-X55
J6
26357
26358
26359
26360
26360
26360
26360
26361
26362
26362
26363
26364
26365
26365
26365
26365
~,~.365
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUdHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER]iS
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
11/16/95
11/16/95'
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/~
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
001425
001414
001414
001414
001006
001006
001006
000128
000128
000127
000136
000136
000137
000137
000137
000447
002106
001233
001393
001393
001393
001393
000155
0005Z3
000523
001056
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR COOP.
ARENSKOV, MARIE
BRADLEY, RONALD E.
BRADLEY', RONALD E.
BRADLEY, RONALD E.
BURTRONXCS BUSINESS SYS
BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS
BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS
LA 6015202110195 TH
320-199-999-5208
REFUND:ACTIViTY CANCELLATION 190-183-498d
REIMB:LEAGUE OF CITIE:10/21-24 001-110-~9~-5258
REIMB:LEAGUE OF ClTIE:10/21-24 001-1170
REIMB:URBAN LAND CONF:10/25-27 001-110-~9-5258
FUJI MICROFILM 16MN 330-199-999-5220
FREIGHT 330-1~-~-5220
TAX 330-199-~<~-5220
CAL'SURANCE ASSOCIATES, EQUIP FLOATER INSURANCE
CAL"SURANCE ASSOCIATES, EQUIP FLOATER INSURANCE
CALXFOONIAN, iNC. 'LEGA PUBLIC NOTICES
CHESHERS' CUSTOM EMBROI CODE ENFORCE JACKET W/SEAL
CHESHERS' CUSTOM EMBROI TAX
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
CHEVRON U S A iNC.
CHEVRON U S A INC.
CHEVRON U S A INC.
SUPPLIES FOR RADIOS
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
CUSEY, LINDA
DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT
DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS SUPPLY-FIELD TANKS
PARKING CITATIONS/AUG 95
PARKING CITATIONS/AUG 95
PARKING CITATIONS/SEPT 95
PARKING CITATIONS/SEPT 95
DATA TICKET, INC.
DATA TICKET, INC.
DATA TICKET, iNC.
DATA TICKET, iNC.
RECORDINGS OF PC MEETINGS
DAVLIN
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER WATER SERV-DIEGO DR LDSC
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER REFUND:PERMIT FEE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
IRRIGATION REPAIR WORK
FERGUSON, RENEE
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST iNTERSTATE BANK C
REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION
5473-6664-0391-0099/JS
5473-6664-0391-0180/KL
547~-6664-0391-0040/PB
5473-6664-0391-0073
5473-6664-0391-0222/RR
300-1~-~-5200
300-1~-~-5200
001-161-501-5256
001-162-~-5243
001-162-9~-5243
190-180-~-5263
001-161-501-5262
001-162-~-5263
190-180-999-5242
190-183-4982
190-2140
100-164-601-5218
001-140-~-5250
001-170-~-5250
001-140-~-5250
001-170-~-5250
001-161-501-5250
193-180-~-5240
001-26&0
193-180-999-5415
190-183-4982
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-~-5258
Z TEN
AMOUNT
70.88
40. O0
176.92
70.20 -
6.00
372.00
5.95
28.83
495. O0
25.15
25,56
60. O0
4,65
83.92
9.39
11.93
39.87
40.00
82.50
10.13
105.00
105.00
106.25
106.25
150.00
297.42
3.00
44.13
25.00
922.16
1,015.70
847.24
766.40
1,076.41
CHECK
AMOUNT
70.88
40.00
112.72
406.78
520.15
25.56
64.65
105.24
39.87
40,00
82.50
10.13
422.50
150.00
300.42
44.13
25.00
VOUCHRE2
11/16/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26365
26365
26365
26365
26365
26365
26365
26366
26366
26367
26367
26367
26368
26369
26370
26370
26~70
26~70
26371
14:55
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95'
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
001002' FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
000177
000177
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
001013 HINDERLITER de LLAMAS A
0013~3 HOWE HELDING & FABRICAT
000194
000194
000194
000194
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
001390 IHAGE WATCHES, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
5/.7~-666~-0391-0172/RB
5/*73-666~-0391-017'Z/RB
5/.73-666~-0391-0115/JG
5/.73-666/*-0391-0206/GR
5/*73 666~ 0391 0123 GT
5/*T3 666~ 0391 012.:3 GT
5/.73-666~-0391-0131/AE
909 69/*-1211 POLICE DEPT
909 694-6/*00 GEN USAGE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SALES TAX ANALYSIS FY 95-96
RAISE OVERHEAD VEHICLE LIGHTS
000194 DEF CONP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
00019/* DEF COMP
CITY EMPLOYEE WATCHES
26372 11/16/95 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN
26372 11/16/95 OOO199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN
26373
26374
26374
26374
26374
26374
26373
26376
26377
26378
11/16/95
000860 JOCHUM, LORI
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV
000869 LAWRENCE WELK RESORT TH
LEMIEUX, ELLEN
000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
NINARDI, MARIO
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
26379
26380
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/29 LUJAN
TEMP HELP WE 11/5 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 11/5 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 11/5 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 11/05 LUJAN
AIRFARE:ECON DEV CONF:MCLARNEY
EXCURSION TO WELK THEATRE 12/7
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
CITY COUNCIL MTG CATERING SERV
TEMP HELP W/E 11/5-I. IPOSCHAK
REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-110-999-5258
001-1170
001-120-999-5258
001-140-999-5260
001-161-502-5258
001-161-501-5258
001-1170
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-1/.0-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
001-1/*0-999-5220
001-1/*0-999-52/.8
100-164-601-5215
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
192-2080
001-1170
001-21/*0
100-21/,0
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
100-164-60/*-5118
190-180-999-5118
001-110-999-5258
190-183-999-5330
190-1834982
001-100-999-5260
100-164-601-5118
190-183-4986
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,666.64
67.20
565.24
32.53
76.49
76.50
84.00
259.18
966.16
70.31
19.44
132.87
912.05
200.00
937.90
86.44
452.78
100.00
388. O0
1/.3.36
143.34
8/*.00
4/*2.00
103.13
103.13
103.14
442.00
5.00
420.00
20.00
80.00
60.00
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
7,196.51
1,205.34
222.62
912.05
200.00
1,577-"'
38~..
286.70
8~.00
1,193.40
5.00
420.00
20.00
80.00
483,73
60. O0
26381 11/16/95 00138~ MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS-B.HANPTON 001-162-999-5222 38.25
26381 11/16/95 O013St, MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 001-162-999-5222 2.96
VOUCHRE2 C/TY OF TEMECULA
11L16/95 16:55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
26382 11/16/95 000228 MOBIL, INC. FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-502-5262
26382 11/16/95. 000228 MOBIL, INC. FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 100-164-601-5263
26383 11/16/95 001200 N P E L R A MEMBERSHIP RENEgAL/G YATES 96 001-150-999-5226
13.80
18.36
160.00
32.16
160.00
26384 11/16/95 001277 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI NATtL LEAGUE CONF:UBNOSKE 001-161-502-5258
500.00
500.00
26385 11/16/95 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. LIFO & FIRO SURVEY SERVS 001-162-999-5261
26386 11/16/95 PATULA, PAULA REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION 190-18~-4982
~45.00
65.00
345.00
65.00
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 001-2130
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 100-2130
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2~90
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 100-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2~90
26387 11/~6/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS REt 194-2390
'26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390
'="~87 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
7 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-?..390
.a7 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 0002/,6 PERS RET 330'2390
~6387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
26387 1'1/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 0002~6 SURVIVOR 192-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 0002~6 SURVIVOR 194-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 0002~6 SURVIVOR 280-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (ENPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390
191.61
65.19
13,264.10
2,636.99
82.54
2,996.80
95.64
105.27
326.05
75.17
226.21
106.83
282.54
109.73
397.29
58.20
10.64
12.56
.47
.93
1,39
,23
.78
.46
.93
,93
2.09
21,051.80
26388 11/16/95 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 100-2122 51.70
51.70
26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5260
26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320
26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370
26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5258
26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5220
26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5220
26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260
30.00
43.60
16.12
24.00
5.06
8.40
15.00
142.18
26390 11/16/95 000580 PHOTO~IORKS MlSC SUPPLIES/SERVICES 001-171-999-5250 44.55 ~4.55
VOUCHRE2
11/16/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26391
26392
26392
26393
26394
26394
26394
26394
26395
26396
26397
26398
26398
26399
26400
26400
26400
26401
26402
26403
26404
26404
26405
26405
26406
26406
26406
26406
26406
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
' 26407
14:55
CHECK
DATE
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
il/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000254
002110
002110
000546
000262
000262
000262
000262
000426
00207'5
001046
000266
000266
000~18
000678
000678
000678
000357
001675
002007
002041
002041
000519
000519
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
0003?5
000375
0003?5
000375
000375
000375
VENDOR
NAME
PRESS-ENTERPRI SE CONPAN
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PRIME EQUIPMENT
RADIO SHACK
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RESOURCE GROUP, THE
REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET
RIGHTHAY
RIGHTWAY
RIVERSIDE CO. CLERk & R
RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE
RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE
RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE
RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSPORT
RIVERSIDE CO./GSA BUILD
SATELLITE COMPUTER SYST
SEAN' MALEK ENGINEERING
SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ADS FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS
EQUIPMENT RENTALS - PARKS
EQUIPMENT RENTALS - PARKS
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
01-06-84300-1/FRONT ST
WATER SERVS 09/27-10/25
~ATER SERVS 09/27-10/25
WATER SERVS 09/27-10/25
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS
CENSUS IN OLD TOgN TEMECULA
OCT 95 PROF LEGAL SERVICES
PORTABLE T~ILETS FOR CITY EXPO
PORTABLE TOLlLET FOR CITY YARD
APERTURE CARD DUPLICATES
HEALTH PERMIT-42775 MARGA
HEALTH PERMIT-30875 RANCHO VIS
HEALTH PERMIT-DE PORTOLA
CO OF R'SIDE NAP MANUAL & STND
RIGHT OF WAY SERVICES/OCT 95
TEM MIDDLE SCHOOL LIGHT PRJT
SIDEWALK IMPROVE-RANCHO VISTA
SIDEWALK IMPROVE-RANCHO VISTA
PEST CONTROL SRVCS-SENIOR CNTR
PEST CNTRL SERVS/KENT HINDERGA
VARIOUS ELECT SERVS LOCATIONS
VARIOUS ELECT SERVS LOCATIONS
VARIOUS ELECT SERVS LOCATIONS
VARIOUS ELECT SERVS LOCATIONS
2-01-202-7530
909 202-4769 JS
909 202-4204 KL
909 202-4763 PB
909 202-4762 RP
909 202-4758 RR
909 205-4070 MJM
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-165-999-5256
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
320-199-999-5221
100-164-601-5240
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5212
165-199-999-5250
001-130-999-5247
190-180-999-5238
100-164-601-5238
001-163-999-5220
190-180-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
001-163-999-5228
280-199-602-5700
210-190-141-5804
210-165-656-580~
210-165-656-5804
190-181-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
193-180-999-5240
192-180-999-5319
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
ITEM
AMOUNT
126.00
94.20
21.81
32.29
15.38
379.63
75.32
J,375.87
14.22
780.00
703.75
100.78
57.39
5.00
65.00
65.00
65.00
43.88
99.86
600.00
2,522.00
30,590.00
29.00
32.00
1,376.02
16.74
7,019.93
72.34
21,882.53
59.02
41.17
36.02
146.49
52.92
155.15
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
126.00
116.01
32.29
1,846.20
14.22
780.00
703.75 -
158.17
5.00
195.00
43.88
99.86
600. O0
33,112.00
61.00
30,367.56
VOUCHRE2
11/16/95
VOucHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26407
26408
26408
26409
26411
26~12
26413
26414
26415
14:55
CHECK
DATE
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11~16/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
0003?5
000375
000375
0003?5
000375
0003?5
0003?5
000375
000375
000375
00037'5
000375
000375
000375
000291
000291
000465
001497
000905
001022
000320
000459
VENDOR
NAME
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON.
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON
SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN
SWAIN, LARRY
T R W, INC.-INFORMATION
TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC
THOMPSON PUBLISHING GRO
TOt~NE CENTER STATIONERS
TUMBLE JUNGLE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
909 202-4770 RB
909 202-4757 JG
909 202-5153 GY
909 202-4767 GT
909 202-4767 GT
909 202-4759 TE
909 203-9994 BB
909 202-4764 PW BLAZER
909 202-4765 PW MAINT CREW
909 202-4760 JH
909 205-8688 PW EOC
909 206-0992 BH
909 202-9876 HP
909 202-4754 KH
909 202-4755 CITY VAN
909 205-7877E0C
909 202-4756 KRTM(EOC)
REPAIR/MAXNT. VEHICLE; B&S
REPAIR/MAXNT. VEHICLE; B&S
PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR
REFUND-TSCD CLASS REGISTRATION
TRW CREDIT SERVS FOR RDA LOANS
SHUTTLE SERVICE/AIRPORT KL
SUB:FAIR LABOR STANDARDS 95-96
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES/PWADMIN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C 001065 DEF COMP
26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP
26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP
26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP
26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP
26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
26417
~_6417
26417
26417
26417
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETZR
U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR-
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-110-999-5208
001-120-999-5208
001-150-999-5208
001-161-501-5208
001-161-502-5208
001-162-999-5208
100-164-601-5208
100-164-601-5208
100-164-601-5208
100-164-603-5208
100-164-604-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-162-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
190-183-999-5330
190-18~-4982
280-199-999-5250
001-100-999-5258
001-150-999-5228
100-164-604-5220
190-183-999-5330
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
194-2080
280-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
193-2160
280-2160
ITEM
AMOUNT
49.04
44.22
96.88
39.53
39.52
46.22
86.33
72.97
48.15
113.70
84.15
59.47
68.88
60.33
44.22
100.49
41.92
20.99
20.99
456.00
20.00
50.00
238.00
59.78
925.60
2,288.09
211.62
367.85
5.00
57.19
5.00
312.50
87.50
413.08
328.34
43.90
65.02
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,586.79
41.98
456.00
20.00
50.00
238.00
59.78
925.60
3,33~.75
926.24
26418 11/16/95 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 001-2120 55.51
VOUCHRE2
11/16/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
HUMBER
26418
26418
26418
26418
26419
26420
26420
26421
26421
26422
26423
26423
26424
26425
26425
14:55
CHECK
DATE
11/16/~5
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/~5
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/~5
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
11/16/95
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTXON
000325 UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
000325 UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN 000325 UW
VINEYARD COUNTRY RESTAU ROOM CHRG OTMA MTG 7/27/95
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BUZLOZNG MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
001342 WAXXE SANITARY SUPPLY~ BUXLDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
001893 WESTERN INDUSTRIAL NGNT TENP HELP W/E 9/13 BERG
001893 WESTERN iNDUSTRIAL MGNT TEMP HELP W/E 9/17 BERG
WESTERN PUMP INC REFUND: CANCELLED FXRE PERMIT
002109 WHITE CAP SUPPLIES FOR SAFETY EXPO
002109 WHITE CAP TAX
001874 WILLIAMS, KAREN
TCSD INSTRUCTORS EARNINGS
WINDSONG HARMONY CHORUS RE-ISSUE/REFUND'SECURITY DEPOS
WINDSONG HARMONY CHORUS RE-ISSUE/REFUND-SECURITY DEPOS
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-2120
165-2120
190-2120
280-2120
280-199-999-5260
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-171-4037
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
190-183-999-5330
190-2900
190-183-4990
ITEM
AMOUNT
6.80
.75
17.00
1.94
60.00
127.31
216.85
145.60
113.75
144.00
186.81
14.48
252.00
100.00
264.00
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
82.00
60.00
344.16
259.35
144.00
201.29
252.00
364.00
150,30~
VO~JCHRE2
11/16/95
15:20
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEVo L(N/HOD SET ASIDE
210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP
320 %NFORHATION SYSTEHS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL
AMOUNT
619,012.70
5,255.00
3,~86.33
540,447,50
15,998.22
7,647.66
3,016.37
2,26~.97
1,197,128.75
VOUCHRE2
11116195
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26~28
26429
26429
26~30
26431
26431
26432
26432
26432
26433
26434
26434
26435
26436
26436
26436
26437
26438
26438
26439
26439
26439
26439
26439
26439
26439
26439
26440
26441
26442
26442
26443
26443
26444
15:20
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28195
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
.11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
001916
001281
001281
001168
001006
001006
001178
001178
001178
000979
001945
001945
0OO754
000351
000351
000351
002062
000820
000820
002042
002042
002042
002042
~02042
002042
002042
002042
001207
001007
O013SS
001383
000270
000270
OOO947
11/28/95
ALBERT A. UEBB ASSOCIAT SEPT DESIGN SERV 6TH ST. PRKIN
ALHAMBRA GROUP
ALHAMBRA GROUP
DESIGN SERVICES-NARGARITA PARK
DESIGN SERV/DUCK POND
BANK OF AMERICA
ADMIN FEES TCSD SERIES 92
BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS MAINT CONTRACT FOR RECORDER
BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS TAX
C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I
C M S BUSINESS FORMS, 1
C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I
BUSINESS LICENSE HAILERS
FREIGHT
TAX
DEL RIO ENTERPRISE DESILTING POND RESTORATION
E. A. MENDOZA CONTIL~CTI RANCHO SPT PRK CONSTRUCTION
E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI RETENTION W/H INV 284-04
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
LANDSCAPE REV]EUS '
GILLISS, MAX C.M..
GILLISS, MAX C.M.
GiLLISS, MAX C.M.
AUG PROF SERVS-CALTRANS
PROF SERVS-CALTRANS MATTERS
SEPT PROF SERVS-CALTRANS MATTE
JOHN EGAN & ASSOCIATES, MESTERN BYPASS-PROF ENG SERVS
K R W & ASSOCIATES
K R W & ASSOCIATES
PROF SERVS AGRMT/LAND DEVE/ENG
WORKERS~ CUMP COVERAGE
KUNZE, INC.
KUNZE, INC.
KUNZE, INC.
KUNZE, INC.
KUNZE, INC.
KUNZE, INC.
KUNZE, INC.
KUNZE, INC.
PARKVIEM SITE ROUGH GRADING
PARKVIE~ SITE ROUGH GRADING
PARKVIE~ SITE ROUGH GRADING
RETENTION:PARKVIEU SITE
PARKVIE~ SITE-PROJ PW93-09
RETENTION:PARKVIE~ P~/93-09
PARKV]E~ SITE ROUGH GRADING
RETENT]ON:PARKVIE~ GRADING
MARTIN J. JASKA, INC. RELEASE RETENTION PW93-O3CSD
N P G CORP,
ASPHALT PATCHING 140RK-RB~ CYN
ASSOCIATES, INC, RDA CONSULTING SERVS-OCT 95
ASSOCIATES, INC. RDA CONSULTING SERVS-OCT 95
DESIGN GROUP, ]NC SEPT PROF SERVS-PRKVIEH SITE
DESIGN GROUP, INC OCT PROF SERVS-FIRE STATION
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS-~INCHESTER/I-15/MP
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280-199-804-5802
210-190-119-5802
210-190-143-5802
390-199-999-5227
330-199-999-5217
330-199-999-5217
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
100-164-601-5401
210-190-137-5804
210-2035
001-161-501-5250
001-110-999-5248
001-110-999-5248
001-110-999-5248
210-165-612-5802
001-163-999-5249
001-1182
210-199-128-5804
210-199-128-5804
210-199-128-5804
210-2035
210-199-128-5804
210-2035
210-199-128-5804'
210-2035
210-2035
100-164-601-5402
280-199-999-5248
165-199-999-5248
210-190-138-5802
210-190-626-5802
280-199-602-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
10,780.88
2,500.00
2,440.00
2,264.97
2,984.00
32.37
1,369.00
49.82
95.83
3,450.00
216,925.00
21,692.50-
1,505.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
6,358.18
3,487.50
113.Z5-
127,857.40
6,000.00
16,250.50
15,010.79'
12,000.00
1,200.00-
21,699.00
2,169.90'
148,911.70
1,805.00
3,484.34
3,486.33
8,175.00
3,565.80
1,?'51,00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
10,780.88
4,940.00
2,264.97
3,016.37
1,514.65
3,450.00
195,2~2.50 '
1,505.00
6,0C
6,358.18
3,374.25
165,426.21
148,911.70
1,805.00
6,972.67
11,740.80
1,731.00
VOUCHRE2
1 ~J 16/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26445
26445
26445
26445
26445
26445
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
26446
'~6
_446
26446
26446
26446
26/+46
26447
26448
26448
26448
26449
26450
264 51
264 51
26452
26453
15:20
CHECK
DATE
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
11/28/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001592
· 001592
001592
001592
001592
001592
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000~06
000~06
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000955
002047
002047
002047
000310
000978
002016
002016
000329
001980
VENDOR
NAME
RIVERSIDE CO. INFORMATI
RIVERSIDE CO. INFORMATI
RIVERSIDE CO, INFORMATI
RIVERSIDE CO, ]NFORNATI
RIVERSIDE CO. INFORMATI
RIVERSIDE CO, INFORMATI
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHER]FF~S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHER]FF~S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERiFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERZFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERZFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF-B
SOIL TECH INC
SOIL TECH INC
SOIL TECH lNC
TEMECULA CREEK INN, INC
TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRO
TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES
TSUTSUNIDA & ASSOCIATES
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, IN
WILLIAM SHERMAN COMPANY
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
CONRNET CONNECTION'CISCO 2500
CONRNET CONNECT]ON-HUB ROUTER
CORNET CONNECTION-ASTROCONM DS
DATA TECHNICIAN LABOR
CONRNET CONNECTION-V,35 CABLE
TAX
LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,~95
LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,'95
LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,~95
LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7~95
LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,'95
LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,~95
LAW ENFORCEMENT -NAY/JUN 7,~95
LAW ENFORCEMENT -NAY/JUN 7,'95
LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,#95
LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,'95
LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95
LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95
LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95
LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95
LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95
LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95
LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95
LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95
LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95
LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95
JUNE 95 BOOKING FEES
CAL-ID ACCESS FOR SHERIFF DEPT
BIKE PATROL FOR SEPT 1995
PROF SRVCS PARKVIEW SITE
PROF SRVCS PARKVIEW SITE
PROF SRVCS/PARKVIEW SITE
COIqlqISSIONERS RECOGNITION
TIP 1ST QUARTER 95-96
PROF SERVS TO DESIGN CiTY HALL
NEW CITY HALL SPACE PLANNING
CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES
FEASIBILITY ANALYS~S/GOLF COUR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-1970
320-1970
320-1970
320-1970
320-1970
320-1970
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5290
001-170-999-5291
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5281
001-1230
001-170-999-52_34
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5291
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5281
001-12.30
001-170-999-5234
001-170-999-5275
001-170-999-5284
001-170-999-5326
210-199-128-5804
210-199-128-5804
210-199-128-5804
001-100-999-5265
001-171-999-5274
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-5804
001-161-502-5248
001-199-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,816.50
2,000.00
2,464.00
960.00
70.00
337.16
197,931.04
5,832.24
3,874.12
2,919.62
29,230.74
10,715.54
12,937.68
17,212.92
3,874.12
6,396.35
155,625.17
21,808.62
4,179.42
1,023.57
26,178.40
9,487.43
15,599.21
18,952.24
4,179.42
5,254.14
12,696.00
27,702.00
1,136.70
390.00
2,521.75
1,650.00
2,829.61
1,312.50
1,515.00
1,761.36
2,680.00
5,050.00
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
7,647.66
593,609.99
1,136.70
4,561.75
2,829.61
1,312.50
3,276.36
2,680.00
5,050.00
TOTAL CHECKS 1,197,128.75
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
November 28, 1995
Records Destruction Approval '
RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided
under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17
which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete
or are .excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the
Government Code.
The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process
of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit
details Encroachment Permits of 7/20/90 to 12/26/91; Conditional Use Case, Tract Maps,
Parcel Merger, Public Works Projects from 6/25/84 to 2/14/92. These records have been
microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Planning
Department and one in permanent off-site storage.
These records are all qualified for destruction at this time under the provisions of the Records
Retention Schedule. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1"
of' the Annual Review as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17.
ATTACHMENTS:
Destruction of Records Request
List of Records recommended for destruction
JSG
FROM:
DATE:
City Clerk
Paula Sargent
Office Technician
November 28, 1995
Destruction of Records Request
Attached is a print out of: Encroachmant Permits (Retention Code 80205) of 7/20/90
(~)(}(}66) to 12/26/91 ($91324); Conditional Use Case, Tract Maps, Parcel Merger, Public
Works Projects (Retention Code 80605) from 6/25/84 (//02708) to 2/14/92 (~r23100). These
records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records
Vault, the Public Works DeparUnent and a copy to the Vault in San Diego.
The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requirements of Govel~ment Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent
to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of
Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
Depati~,ent ~
· saph Kicak Public. Works Depat i~itent
//- / J".~',~. .
City Attorney: ~///4, ~ "
Date . :.'
R:\formi~d~sttuot.rqa
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Doc. Ref ......... 163 Rage 1
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 80205 09:05:05
Destruction Date. 11/28/1995
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
163 07/20/1990 90066 Encroachment Rermit 90-066 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/20/1990 90067 Encroachment Permit 90-067 80205 0050 Film 3821MIAO001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/20/1990 90068 Encroachment Permit 90-068 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/23/1990 90065 Encroachment Permit 90-065 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/23/1990 90069 Encroachment Permit 90-069 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 07/23/1990 90073 Encroachment Permit 90-073 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/24/1990 90070 Encroachment Permit 901070 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/24/1990 90071 Encroachment Permit 90-071 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
G~oup I 163/120/The Vault
07/25/1990 90072 Encroachment Permit 90-072 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
GrOup I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/25/1990 90074 Encroachment Permit 90-074 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/25/1990 90075 Encroachment Remit 90-075 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/25/1990 90076 Encroachment Permit 90-076 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/25/1990 90077 Encroachment Permit 90-077 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/25/1990 90078 Encroachment Permit 90-078 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/26/1990 90079 Encroachment Permit 90-079 ~0205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
16t 07/27/1990 90080- Encroachment Permit 90-080 80205 0051) Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/27/1990 90081 Encroachment Permit 90-081 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
07/30/1990 90082 Encroachment Permit 90-082 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 2
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere'
163 07/30/1990 90084 Encroachment Permit 90-084 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/30/1990 90085 Encroachment Permit 90-085 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/31/1990 90086 Encroachment Permit 90-086 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/31/1990 90087 Encroachment Permit 90-087 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/31/1990 90088 Encroachment Permit 90-088 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault.
163 07/31/1990 90089 Encroachment Permit 90-089 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/31/1990 90090 Encroachment Permit 90-090 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/31/1990 90091 Encroachment Permit 90-091 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/31/1990 90092 Encroachment Permit 90-092 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/01/1990 90093 Encroachment Permit 90-093 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/01/1990 90094 Encroachment Permit 90-094 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/01/1990 90095 Encroachment Permit 90-095 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/01/1990 90096 Encroachment Permit 90-096 8O205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/06/1990 90097 Encroachment Permit 90-097 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/07/1990 90099 Encroachment Permit 90-099 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163' 08/08/1990 90100- Encroachment Permit 90-100 80205 00~0 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/09/1990 90111 Encroachment Permit 90-111 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/10/1990 90101 Encroachment Permit 90-101 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 3
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:0S:05
Doc. Item ReU. File Reference # Storage Media
Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
1~ 08/13/1990 90102 Encroachment Petit 90-102 8020~ 0050 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~
163 08/13/1990 90103 ~croac~n= Pe~i~ 90-103 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul=
163 08/15/1990 90104 Encroac~ent Pemi~ 90-104 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul=
163 08/15/1990 90105 Encroac~en~ Pe~ 90-105 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vauln
163 08/15/1990 90106 Encroac~enn Pemi~ 90-106 8020~ 00~0 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vauln
163 08/16/1990 90108 Encroac~en~ Pe~i~ 90-108 80205 0050 Film 382~1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 08/20/1990 90112 Encroac~en~ Pemin-90-112 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~
163 08/21/1990 90113 Encroac~nn Pemi~ 90-113 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
08/21/1990 90114 Encroac~en~ Pem~ 90-114 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul=
163 08/21/1990 90115 Encroac~en~ Petit 90-115 80205 0050 Film 382~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 08/21/1990 90116 Encroac~en~ Pemi= 90-116 80205 0050 Film 382~0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~
163 08/2121990 90117 Encroac~en= Pe~i~ 90-117 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/~e vault
163 08/22/1990 90118 ~croac~en~ Pe~i~ 90-1~8 80205 00~0 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 08/23/1990 90119 Encroac~en= Pe~i~ 90-119 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~
163 08/23/~990 90120 Encroac~enE Pemi= 90-120 80205 0050 Film 3821~0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~
163 08/23/1990 90122 Encroac~nn Pemi= 90-122 80205 00~0 Film 382180001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul=
163 08/23/1990 90123 Encroachmen~ Pemi= 90-123 8020~ 0050 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vauln
08/23/1990 90124 Encroac~n= Pemi~ 90-124 80205 0050 Film 3821M~000~
Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~
'RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 4
11/07/1995 Files ReadV for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refer-
Film 3821MIA0001
163 08/24/1990 90125 Encroachment Permit 90-125 80205 0050
Group I 163/120/The Vault
3821MIAO001
163 08/24/1990 90126 Encroachment Permit 90-126 80205 0050 Film
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/27/1990 90127 Encroachment Permit 90-127 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/27/1990 90128 Encroachment Permit 90-128 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/27/1990 90129 Encroachment Permit 90-129 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/28/1990 90130 Encroachment Permit 90-130 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
183 08/28/1990 90131 Encroachment Permit 90-131 80205 00S0 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/28/1990 90132 Encroachment Permit 90-132 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/28/1990 90133 Encroachment Permit 90-133 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/28/1990 90134 Encroachment Permit 90-134 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/28/1990 90135 Encroachment Permit 90-135 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/28~/1990 90136 .Encroachment Permit 90-136 80205 0050 Film 382.1MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/29/1990 90137 Encroachment Permit 90-137 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/29/1990 90138 Encroachment Permit 90-138 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/30/1990 90139 Encroachment Permit 90-139 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
1'b'3 08/30/1990 90140 Encroachment Permit 90-140 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/31/1990 90141 Encroachment Permit 90-141 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/31/1990 90142 Encroachment Permit 90-142 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 5
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
~ ', Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
163 09/04/1990 90143 Encroachment Permit 90-143 80205 0050 Film 3821M1AO001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/04/1990 90144 Encroachment Permit 90-144 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/04/1990 90145 Encroachment Permit 90-145 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/04/1990 90146 Encroachment Permit 90-146 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/06/1990 90148 Encroachment Permit 90-148 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
.................................................... r .............
163 09/06/1990 90149 Encroachment Permit 90-149 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
· Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/10/1990 90153 Encroachment Permit 90-153 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/10/1990 90155 Encroachment Permit 90-155 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
~ 09/11/1990 90156 Encroachment Permit 90-156 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/12/1990 901~8 Encroachment Permit 90-158 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/12/1990 90159 Encroachment Permit 90-159 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/12/1990 90160 Encroachment Permit 90-160 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/13/1990 90161 Encroachment Permit 90-161 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The'vault
163 09/13/1990 90162 Encroachment Permit 90-162 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/17/1990 90165 Encroachment Permit 90-165 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
16) 09/17/1990 '90166 Encroachment Permit 90-166 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/18/1990 90167 Encroachment Permit 90-167 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
. ................. : .............................................
09/18/1990 90170 Encroachment Permit 90-170 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 6
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09.'05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere- -
163 09/18/1990 90171 Encroachment PerTnit 90-171 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/19/1990 90169 Encroachment Permit 90-169 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 183/120/The Vault
163 09/20/1990 90172 Encroachment Permit 90-172 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/20/1990 90173 Encroachment Permit 90-173 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/20/1990 90174 Encroachment Permit 90-174 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault'
163 09/24/1990 90150 Encroachment Permit 90-150 80205 0050 Film 3821MLA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/24/1990 90151 Encroachment Permit 90-151 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/24/1990 90152 Encroachment Permit 90-152 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/24/1990 90176 Encroachment Permit 90-176 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/25/1990 90178 Encroachment Permit 90-178 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/25/1990 90180 Encroachment Permit 90-180 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/26/1990 90181 Encroachment Permit 90-181 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/27/1990 90177 Encroachment Permit 90-177 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/28/1990 90182 Encroachment Permit 90-182 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/28/1990 90183 Encroachment Permit 90-183 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
............ T .....................................................
16~/ 09/28/1990 90184 Encroachment Permit 90-184 80205 00~0 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/28/1990 90185 Encroachment Permit 90-185 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 09/28/1990 90186 Encroachment Permit 90-186 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
RRDESTY...RR061 Ci=V of Temecula Page 7
11/07/1995 Files ReadV for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
-'- Date Ref. Brief Descripnion Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
l~a 09/28/1990 90187 Encroachment Permit 90-187 80205 0050' Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/28/1990 90188 Encroachment Permit 90-188 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/28/1990 90189 Encroachment Permit 90-189 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/03/1990 90190 Encroachment Permit 90-190 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/03/1990 90191 Encroachment Permit 90-191 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/04/1990 90193 Encroachment Permit 90-193 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul:
163 10/05/1990 90195 Encroachment Permit 90~195 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/05/1990 90197 Encroachment Fermit 90-197 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
"' 10/05/1990 90198 Encroachment Permit 90-198 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/08/1990 90157 Encroachment Permit 90-157 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 10/08/1990 90196 Encroachment Permit 90-196 80205 0050 Film 382180001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/08/1990 90199 Encroachment Permit 90-199 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/09/1990 90179 Encroachment Permit 90-179 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/09/1990 90200 Encroachment Permit 90-200 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/09/1990 90201 Encroachment Permit 90-201 8D205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/10/1990. 90163 Encroachment Permit 90-163 80205 00~0 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/11/1990 90202 Encroachment Permit 90-202 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
10/11/1990 90203 Encroachment Permit 90-203 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
~...RR061 City of Temecula Page 8
11/07/1995 " Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Referen~,
163 10/15/1990 90204 Encroachment Permit 90-204 80205 00S0. Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 10/16/1990 90205 Encroachment Permit 90-205 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/17/1990 90206 Encroachment Permit 90-206 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/17/1990 90207 Encroachment Permit 90-207 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/17/1990 90209 Encroachment Permit 90-209 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/17/1990 90210 Encroachment Permit 90-210 80205 0050 Film 3821MLA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/17/1990 90211 Encroachment Permit 90-211 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/17/1990 90212 Encroachment Permit 90-212 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/18/1990 90213 EncrOachment Permit 90-213 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001
Group' I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/18/1990 90214 Encroachment Permit 90-214 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/18/1990 90215 Encroachment Permit 90-215 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/19/1990 90216 Encroachment Permit 90-216 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 10/22/1990 90217 Encroachment Permit 90-217 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/23/1990 90218 Encroachmenn Permit 90-218 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 ~0/24/1990 90220 Encroachment Permit 90-220 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
16} 10/25/1990 90221 Encroachment Permit 90-221 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/25/1990 90222 Encroachment Permit 90-222 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001
G~roup I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/25/1990 90233 Encroachment Permit 90-233 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 9
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09: 05: 05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
~ Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
lua 10/26/1990 90225 Encroachment Permit 90-225 80205 0051' Film 3821MLA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/26/1990 90226 Encroachment Permit 90-226 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/26/1990 90227 Encroachment Permit 90-227 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/26/1990 90230 Encroachment Permit 90-230 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/27/1990 90228 Encroachment Permit 90-228 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/27/1990 90229 Encroachment Permit 90-229 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/27/1990 90244 Encroachment Permit 90-244 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/30/1990 90219 Encroachment Permit 90-219 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
· ' 10/30/1990 90232 Encroachment Permit 90-232 80205 0051 Film 3821M1AO001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/30/1990 90233 Encroachment Permit 90-233, 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/30/1990 90237 Encroachment Permit 90-237 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/30/~990 90238 Encroachment Permit 90-238 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/31/1990 90231 Encroachment Permit 90231 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/31/1990 90235 Encroachment Permit 90-235 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/01/1990 90234 Encroachment Permit 90-234 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
18 11/01/1990 90236 Encroachment Permit 90-236 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/01/1990 NPDES NPDES 80205 0052# 0053° 0054 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
11/06/1990 90241 Encroachment Permit 90-241 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 10
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location RefereD~a~
163 11/07/1990 90243 Encroachment Permit 90-234 80205 00fl Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 164/120/The Vault
163 11/07/1990 90244 Encroachment Permit 90-244 80205 0051 Film 3821M1AO001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/07/1990 90245 Encroachment Permit 90-245 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/10/1990 90249 Encroachment Permit 90-249 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/10/1990 90250 Encroachment Permit 90-250 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/14/1990 90248 Encroachment Permit 90-248 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 11/15/1990 90252 Encroachment Permit 90-252 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/15/1990 90253 Encroachment Permit 90-253 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/20/1990 90254 Encroachment Permit 90-254 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/20/1990 90255 Encroachment Permit 90-25'5 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/20/1990 90256 Encroachment Permi~ 90-256 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/21/1990 90257 Encroachment Permit 90-257 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/21/1990 90258 Encroachment Permit 90-258 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/27/1990 90259 Encroachment Permit 90-259 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/27/1990 90260 Encroachment Permit 90-260 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
~6a 11/27/1990 90261 Encroachment Permit 90-261 80205 0OS1 Film 3821MLA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/28/1990 90247 Encroachment Permit 90-247 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/28/1990 90263 Encroachment Fermit 90-263 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 11
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
r~-- Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
1~ 11/28/1990 90264 Encroachment Permit 90-264 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/28/1990 90265 Encroachment Permit 90-265 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/29/1990 '90262 Encroachment Permit 90262 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/30/1990 90266 Encroachment Permit 90-266 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/30/1990 90267 Encroachment Permit 90-267 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/30/1990 90272 Encroachment Permit 90-272 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
· Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/30/1990 90273 Encroachment Permit 90-273 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 12/01/1990 90269 Encroachment Permit 90-269 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
'~ 12/03/1990 90268 Encroachment Permit 90-268 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/04/1990 90270 Encroachment Permit 90-270 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/06/1990 90274 Encroachment Permit 90-274 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/10/1990 90242 Encroachment Permit 90-242 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/10/1990 90275 Encroachment Permit 90-275 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/10/1990 90276 Encroachment Permit 90-276 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/10/1990 90277 Encroachment Permit 90-277 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
16~ 12/10/1990 '90279 Encroachment Permit 90-279 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/11/1990 90282 Encroachment Permit 90-282 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
12/12/1990 90280 Encroachment Permit 90-280 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 Ci=V of Temecula ~sge 12
11/07/1995 Files ReadV for Destruction 0~:~5:05
Doc. IUem Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Dace Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere~
163 12/17/1990 90283 Encroachment Permit 90-283 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/18/1990 90271 Encroachment Permit 90-271 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/18/1990 90285 Encroachmenn Permit 90-285 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaulc
163 12/18/1990 90286 Encroachment Permit 90-286 80205 00S1 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 12/19/1990 90287 Encroachment Permit 90-287 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/19/1990 90288 Encroachment Permit 90-288 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The VaulU
163 12/20/1990 90289 Encroachment Permit 90-289 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/20/1990 90290 Encroachmenc Permic 90-290 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/20/1990 90291 Encroachment Permit 90-291 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 --.
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/20/1990 90292 Encroachmen: Permit 90-292 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/24/1990 90294 Encroachment Permit 90-294 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/27/1990 90296 Encroachment Permit 90-296 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/27/1990 90297 Encroachment Permi~ 90-297 80205 00S1 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 13/28/1990 90300 Encroachment Permit 90-300 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 153/120/The Vault
163 12/28/1990 90301 Encroachment Permi~ 90-301 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
1~3 12/31/1990 90281 Encroachmen~ Permit 90-281 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
................................................................. 7
163 12/31/1990 90295 Encroachment Permit 90-295 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 153/120/The Vault
163 12/31/1990 90299 Encroachment Permit 90-299 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 13
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage ~oca=ion Location Reference
163 12/31/1990 90302 Encroachment Permit 90-302 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/31/1990 90303 Encroachment Permit 90-303 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/31/1990 90304 Encroachment Permit 90-304 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/31/1990 90305 Encroachment Permit 90-305 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/31/1990 90306 Encroachment Permit 90-306 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 01/04/1991 91005 Encroachment Permit 91-005 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 01/18/1991 90233 Encroachment Permit 90-233 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 01/25/1991 90298 Encroachment Permit 90-298 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001
droup I 163/120/The Vault
04/09/1991 90251 Encroachment Permit 90-251 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/08/1991 91149 Encroachment Permit 91-149 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/08/1991 91150 Encroachment Permit 91-150 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/09/1991 91151 Encroachment Permit 91-151 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/13/1991 91152 Encroachment Permit 91-152 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/14/1991 91153 Encroachment Permit 91-153 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/17/1991 91154 Encroachment Permit 91-154 '80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
lb'3 05/18/1991 91155 Encroachment Permit 91-155 80205 0~1 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/23/1991 91156 Encroachment Permit 91-156 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
05/23/1991 91157 Encroachment Permit 91-157 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 14
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruc=ion 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Referees-
163 05/24/1991 91158 Encroachment Permit 91-158 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul:
163 05/24/1991 91159 Encroac~nn Pe~i~ 91-159 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Grip I 163/120/The vaul~
163 05/28/1991 91160 Encroachment Pemi~ 91-160 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 05/31/199Z 91161 Encroac~en= Pemin 91-161 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul=
163 05/31/1991 9~162 Encroac~en= Perle 91-162 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 05/31/1991 91166 Encroac~en~ Pemi= 91-166 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 06/03/1991 91163 Encroac~en= Pe~iu 91-163 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 06/04/1991 91164 Encroac~enn Pemi~ 91-164 80205 0051 Film 3821~0001
~roup I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 06/0~/1991 91165 Encroac~enn Pemn 91-165 80205 0051 Film
Grou~ I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 06/07/1991 91167 Encroachmen~ Petit 91-167 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 06/07/1991 91168 ~croac~en= Pemi~ 91-168 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~
163 06/11/1991 91169 ~croac~en~ Pemin 91-169 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vauln
163 06/12/1991 91170 ~croac~en~ Pe~i~ 91-170 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 06/13/1991 91171 ~croac~en~ Pe~i~ 91-171 80205 0051 Film 3821~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 .06/14/1991 91172 ~croac~en~ Pe~i= 91-172 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul=
1~ 06/17/1991 9117B ~croac~enC Pem~ 91-173 80205 0~1 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/~20/The Vaul~
163 06/17/1991 91174 ~croac~enc Pemi~ 91-174 80205 0051 Film 382~0001
Group I 163/120ZThe Vaul~
163 06/17/1991 91175 ~cr~c~en= Pe~i= 91-175 80205 00~1 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/~e vaul~
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 15
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
'~"' Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
163 06/18/1991 91176 Encroachment Permit 91-176 88205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 06/19/1991 91177 Encroachment Permit 91-177 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 06/19/1991 91178 Encroachment Permit 91-178 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 06/21/1991 91180 Encroachment Permit 91-180 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 06/24/1991 91179 Encroachment Permit 91-179 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 06/25/1991 91181 Encroachment Permit 91-181 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 06/25/1991 91182 Encroachment Permit '91-182 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 06/25/1991 91183 Encroachment Permit 91-183 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
06/25/1991 91184 Encroachment Permit 91-184 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 06/25/1991 91185 Encroachment Permit 91-185 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
.......................... . ............ ~ ...........................
163 06/26/1991 91186 Encroachment Permit 91-186 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 07/10.91991 91190 Encroachment Permit 91-190 80205 00$1 Film 382iM1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/11/1991 91191 Encroachment Permit 91-191 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 07/15/1991 91192 Encroachment Permit 91-192 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/17/1991 91193 Encroachment Permit 91-193 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
183 07/22/1991 91194 Encroachment Permit 91-194 80205 0081 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/25/1991 91198 Encroachment Permit 91-198 80205 00S1 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
07/29/1991 91199 Encroachment Permit 91-199 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 16
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere~"
163 07/30/1991 91200 Encroachment Permit 91-200 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/30/1991 91201 Encroachment Permit 91-201 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/01/1991 91206 Encroachment Permit 91-206 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The VaulE
163 08/02/1991 91207 Encroachment Permit 91-207 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/06/1991 91208 Encroachment Permit 91-208 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/06/1991 91209 Encroachment Permit 91-209 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 08/06/1991 91210 Encroachment Permit"91-210 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 08/06/1991 91211 Encroachment Permit 91-211 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/07/1991 91212 Encroachment Permit 91-212 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/07/1991 91213 Encroachment Permit 91-213 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/07/1991 91214 Encroachment Permit 91-214 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/07/1991 91215 Encroachment Permit 91-215 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/08/1991 91216 Encroachment Permit 91-216 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/08/3991 91217 Encroachment Permi~ 91-217 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 08/08/1991 91218 Encroachment Permit 91-218 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
16T 08/15/1991 91222 Encroachment Permit 91-222 80205 0081 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/15/1991 91223 Encroachment Permit 91-223 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/19/1991 91224 Encroachment Permit 91-224 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 17
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
r~ "- Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
16j 08/19/1991 91225 Encroachment Permit 91-225 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/19/1991 91226 Encroachment Permit 91-226 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/20/1991 91227 Encroachment Permit 91-227 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/22/1991 91228 Encroachment Permit 91-228 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/22/1991 91229 Encroachment Permit 91-229 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/26/1991 91205 Encroachment Permit 91-205 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/26/1991 91230 Encroachment Permit 91-230 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/27/1991 91231 EncroaChment Permit 91-231 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
) 08/30/1991 91232 Encroachment Permit 91-232 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group.. I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/30/1991 912,34 Encroachment Permit 91-234 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 09/04/1991 91235 Encroachment Permit 91-235 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/05/1991 91236 Encroachment Permit 91-236 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/05/1991 91237 Encroachment Permit 91-237 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The 'Vault
163 09/06/1991 91238 Encroachment Permit 91-238 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/09/1991 91239 Encroachment Permit 91-239 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
169 09/09/1991 91240 Encroachment Permit 91-240 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/11/1991 91241 Encroachment Permit 91-241 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
09/12/1991 91242 Encroachment Permit 91-242 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDCSTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 18
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 0~:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code SecuritV Class Storage Location Location Refere--~
163 09/12/1991 91243 Encroachment Permit 91-243 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/16/1991 91244 Encroachment Permit 91-244 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/16/1991 91245 Encroachment Permit 91-245 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/17/1991 91246 Encroachment Permit 91-246 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/18/1991 91249 Encroachment Permit 91-249 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vaul6
163 09/20/1991 91251 Encroachment Permit 91-251 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/23/1991 91252 Encroachment Permit 91-252 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/23/1991 91253 Encroachment Permit 91-253 80205 0061 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/23/1991 91254 EnCroachment Permit 91-254 . 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/25/1991 91248 Encroachment Permit 91-248 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/25/1991 91255 Encroachment Permit 91-255 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/27/1991 91258 Encroachment Permit 91-258 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
....................................... T ...................... ' ....
163 09/30/1991 91257 Encroachment Permit 91-257 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 09/30/1991 91260 Encroachment Permit 91-260 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/01/1991 91262 Encroachment Permit 91-262 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
l~F3 10/01/1991 91263 EncroaChment Permit 91-263 80205 00~1 Fil~ 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/02/1991 91264 Encroachment Permit 91-264 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 10/04/1991 91265 Encroachment Permit 91-265 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 19
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
~"'~- Da=e Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
lu~ 10/08/1991 91261 Encroachment Permit 91-261 80205 0051. Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/08/1991 91266 Encroachment Permit 91-266 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group ~ 163/120/~e vaul~
163 ' 10/08/1991 91267 Encroachmen= Pem~ 91-267 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul=
163 10/08/1991 91268 Encroac~en= Pemi~ 91-268 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul=
163 10/14/1991 9~272 Encroachmen= Pe~i~ 91-272 8020~ 00~1 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul=
163 10/15/1991 91273 Encroachmenn Pemi~ 91-273 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vaulz
163 10/15/1991 91274 ~ncroac~en= Pemi= 91-274 8020~ 00~1 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~
163 10/15/1991 91275 Encroachmen~ Pemi~ 91-275 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vault
~ 10/16/1991 91276 Encroac~en~ Pe~i= 91-276 80205 00~1 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The vaul=
163 10/16/1991 91277 Encroac~en~ Pemi~ 91-277 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vault
163 10/!7/1991 91278 ~ncroac~en~ Pem~ 91-278 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 10/17/1991 91279 Encroac~enn Pemi= 91-279 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~
163 10/17/1991 91280 Encroac~ent Pemi~ 91-280 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/18/1991 91282 Encroac~en~ Pemit 91-282 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 10/18/1991 91283 Encroac~en~ Pemin 91-283 ~0205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 10/21/199~. 91284 Encroach~n~ Pe~i~ 91-284 80205 00~1 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
163 10/21/1991 91285 Encroac~en~ Petit 91-285 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul=
10/23/1991 91286 Encroac~ent Pemit 91-286 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vaul~
RJU~ESTY...RR061 C~y of Temec~la Page 20
11/07/1995 " Files Ready for Dest~ction 0~:05:0S
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere~-~,.
163 10/23/1991 91287 Encroachment Permit 91-287 80205 0051. Film 3821MLA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/24/1991 91288 Encroachment Permit 91-288 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/24/1991 91289 Encroachment Permit 91-289 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/25/1991 91290 Encroachment Permit 91-290 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/28/1991 91291 Encroachment Permit 91-291 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/29/1991 91292 Encroachment Permit 91-292 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 10/29/1991 91293 Encroachment Permit 91-293 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/05/1991 91300 Encroachment Permit 91-300 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/08/1991 91295 Encroachment Permit 91-295 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 -.
Grou~ I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/12/1991 91302 Encroachment Permit 91-302 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/12/1991 91303 Encroachment Permit 91-303 80205 0051 Film 3821MiAO001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/13/1991 91304 Encroachment Permit 91-304 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/19/1991 91306 Encroachment Permit 91-306 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/21/1991 91307 Encroachment Permit 91-307 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 ~1/22/1991 91308 Encroachment Permit 91-308 80205 0051 Film 3821M1AO001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
1~3 11/25/1991. 91301 Encroachment Permit 91-301 80205 00~1 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/25/1991 91309 Encroachment Permit 91-309 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
~roup I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/25/1991 91311 Encroachment Permit 91-311 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 21
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09: 05: 05
Doc- Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
p-'~- Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
1~ 11/27/1991 91312 Encroachment Permit 91-312 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/02/1991 91315 Encroachment Permit 91-315 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/04/1991 91316 Encroachment Permit 91-316 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/04/1991 91317 Encroachment Permit 91-317 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/05/1991 91318 Encroachment Permit 91-318 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The VaulU
163 12/10/1991 91320 Encroachment Permit 91-320 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
...................... T ...........................................
163 12/12/1991 91319 Encroachment Permit 91-319 80205 0051 Film 3821MIAO001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/16/1991 91321 Encroachment Permit 91-321 80205 0051
Group I
]~ 12/17/1991 91321 Encroachment Permit 91-321A 80205 0051
Group I
Film 3821MIA0001
163/120/The Vault
Film 3821M1A0001
163/120/The Vault
163 12/18/1991 91197 Encroachment Permit 91-197 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/18/1991 91322 Encroachment Permit 91-322 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/2021991 91323 Encroachment Permit 91-323 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/26/1991 91324 Encroachment Permit 91-324 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
373 Records Processed
'RR~ES~Y...R~061 Cit~ of Temeeula Doe, Ref ......... 163 ~age 1
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 80605 09:30:11
Destruction Date. 11/28/1995
Dec- Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Referend,_
163 06/25/1984 02708 Conditional Use Case 02708 80605 0055. Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 02/10/1988 23267 Tract 23267-4 80605 0056 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 02/10/1988 23299 Tract 23299 80605 0056 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 02/11/1988 23267 Tract 23267-F 80605 0056 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 08/03/1988 23335 Parcel Merger 23335 80605 0056 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/25/1988 23103 Tract 23103 80605 0058 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/28/1988 23102 Tract 23102 80605 0057 & 0058 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 11/08/1988 23101 Tract 23101 80605 0057 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
183 11/09/1988 23101 Tract 23101-2 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 03/20/1989 24187 Tract 24187 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/23/1989 24186 Tract 24186 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/24/1989 24186 Tract 24186-1 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/25/1989 24186 Tract 24186-2 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/26/1989 24186 Tract 24186-3 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/27/1989 24186 Tract 24186-4 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
1~ 07/12/1988 23125 Tract 23125 80605 0058 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/24/1889 24188 Tract 24188 Inf. 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001
qroup I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/25/1989 24188 Tract 24188 806050055 Film '3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 2
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:30:11
Dec. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
-' Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
16~ 09/26/1989 24185 Tract 24185-1 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/26/1989 24187 Tract 24187-1 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/26/1989 24188 Tract 24188-1 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The vault
163 09/27/1989 24185 Tract 24185-2 80605 0057 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/27/1989 24187 Tract 24187-2 80605 0058 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/27/1989 24188 Tract 24188-2 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/28/1989 24185 Tract 24185 80605 0057 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/28/1989 24188 Tract 24188-3 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
' 09/29/1989 24188 Tract 24188-4 80605 0055 Film 3821MIJ~0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/30/1989 24188 Tract 24188-5 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 05/20/1990 03042 Conditional Use Permit 03042 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 07/03/1990 23371 Tract 23371 80605 0056 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/17/1990 03036 Conditional Use Case 03036 80605 0055 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/18/1990 03076 Conditional Use Permit 03076 80605 0055 & 0056 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 01/30/1991 03334 Tract 03334 80605 0056 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
16~ 07/15/1991 91004 Public Works 91-004 80605 0056 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 09/27/1991 94019 Public Works 94o019 80605 0056 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
12/05/1991 92009 Public Works 92-009 80605 0056 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 3
11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:30:11
Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Locatlon Location Refere +'
163 12/12/1991 91003 Pttblic Works 91-003 80605 0056 Film 3821MIAO001
Group I 163/120/~e Vault
163 02/14/1992 23100 Tract 23100-3 80605 0057 Film 3821MIAO001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
38 Records Processed
rI'EM 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL~~
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance
November 28, 1995
City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1995
PREPARED BY: Steve Oakley, Accountant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report
as of September 30, 1995.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and
receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646
and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code
Sections as of September 30, 1995.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1995
2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of September 30,
1995
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of September 30, 1995
Cash Activity for the Month of September:
Cash and Investments as of September 1, 1995 $
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of September 30, 1995 $
54,933,278
1,988,295
(1,936,657)
54,984,916
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment Institution Yield Balance
Petty Cash
General Checking
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Defined Contribution Fund
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs
Reserve Account-TCSD COPs
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
Construction Fund-RDA Bonds
Reserve Account-RDA Bonds
City Hall
First Interstate
First Interstate
State Treasurer 5.832
ICMA
PEBSCO
PEBSCO
Bank of America 5.434
BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.870
Bank of America 5.434
BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.210
BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 7.400
800
(19,738)
3,712
40,395,328
273.833
396 567
27 125
351 016
502 690
718 663
1 O, 886, 000
1,448 920
54,984,916
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next
thirty days.
City of Temecula
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
As of September 30, 1995
Assets:
Cash and investments
Receivables
Due from other funds
Land held for resale
Fixed assets-net
Total assets
Community
Services Redevelopment
City (1) District Agency
Total
$ 32,972,497 $ 2,187,677 $ 19,824,742 $ 54,984,916
2,983,497 122,300 202,076 3,307,873
551,944 551,944
918,171 2,103,053 3,021,224
424,895 424,895
$ 37,851,004 $ 2,309,977 $ 22,129,871 $
62,290,852
Liabilities and fund equity:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds $ 519,144
Other liabilities 6,036,550 $
Total liabilities
$ 32,800 $
167,843 89,272
6,555,694 167,843 122,072
Fund equity:
Contributed capital 1,055,344
Retained earnings 144,920
Fund balances:
Reserved (2) 3,746,559
Designated (3) 18,267,056
Undesignated 8,081,431
Total fund equity 31,295,310
$ 37,851,004 $
Total liabilities and fund equity
989,272 6,576,522
1,152,862 15,431,277
2,142,134 22,007,799
2,309,977 $ 22,129,871
551,944
6,293,665
6,845,609
1,055,344
144,920
11,312,353
34,851,195
8,081,431
55,445,243
62,290,852
(1) includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and deferred comp agency funds,
(2) Includes amounts' reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, low/rood housing,
and debt Service.
(3) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations.
rI'EM 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC
CITY MANAGE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT.
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Parcel Map No. 28223 (located north of Winchester Road and west of
Diaz Road)
PREPARED BY: _J~/Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer
(~Annie Bostre-Le, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Parcel Map No. 28223, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 28223 was approved by the Planning Director of the City of
Temecula on August 7, 1995. The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of
Approval.
This parcel map is a portion of a previous subdivision, Parcel Map No. 21383. Parcel Map No.
28223 resubdivides Parcels 101 to 112 to create one (1) 12.1 acre parcel. The property is
located north of Winchester Road and west of Diaz Road. The applicant is the John W. Hoffee
II.
The following fees have been paid for Parcel Map No. 28223:
Stephen's K-Rat Fee
Public Facilities Deposit
Signal Mitigation Fee
Flood Control Fee
$23,595.00
~10,000.00
~21,175.00
~23,660.00
The following fees have been deferred for Parcel Map No. 28223:
Fire Mitigation Fee
Due prior to Building Permit
Improvements were constructed with the underlying Parcel Map No. 21383, therefore no
bonds are required for Parcel Map No. 28223.
· -1- r:\agdrpt\95\l 128~prn28223
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Location Map
Copy of Sheet I of Parcel Map 28223
Fees and Securities Report
-2- r:~agdrpt~95~l 128~pm28223
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
Final Parcel Man No. 28223
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
Fee .
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby Fees)
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Public Facility
Fire Mitigation
Flood Control (ADP)
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 6
N/A
Condition No. 31
Condition No. 56
See Fire Department
Letter dated 5/19/95
Condition No. 42
-3- r:~agdrpt\95~1128\pm28223
VIClNITY I~IA P
OWNE3rS STATENENT
~ CONS~NII~ NOI'E
OJ~/E TrAELE*
/
PARCEL
/
/<\ · \
\
\
C,~'Y BVOl',t2R'~ $TA1~agC
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 28223 DATE: November 14, 1995
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 0 $ 0 '
Water 0 0
Sewer 0 0
TOTAL $ 0 $ 0
Improvements were constructed with the underlying Parcel Map No. 21383, therefore no
bonds are required for Parcel Map No. 28223.
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD Drainage Fee
Fire Mitigation Fee -
Signal Mitigation Fee -
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Development Fees
N/A
Paid
T.B.D.*
Paid
N/A
T.B.D*
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Letter of Map Revision (LOMR Review)
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
*T.B.D. - To be determined
55.00
4.00
770.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
829.00
0.00
-4- r:\agdrpt\95~l 128\pm28223
ITEM 7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Completion and Acceptance of the Parkview Site Rough
Improvements, Project No. PW93-09
Grading
PREPARED BY:(~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the Parkview Site Rough Grading Improvements, Project No.
PW93o09, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
of Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
On August 8, 1995, the City Council awarded a contract for the Parkview Site Rough Grading
Improvements, Project No. PW93-09, to Kunze, Inc. for $277,018.00. The project included
rough grading of the site, rough grading for the widening of Pauba Road, construction of
drainage ditches and a desilting basin, and hydroseeding. There was also some
overexcavation of the canyon areas to remove loose and uncompacted material.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer·
The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days
after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
r:~agdtpt\9:~\1128~pw93-Og.acc
FISCAL IMPACT:
The .contract amount for this project was $277,018.00 with a contingency amount of
27,701.80. The total contract amount of the project decreased by $5,448.50 due to a
reduction in the actual quantities of the unclassified excavation, canyon subdrain, and
hydroseeding. The Contract Change Orders were for the unforeseen additional removals of
overexcavated material encountered in the canyon areas and were beyond the scope of work
of the awarded contract. Contract Change Order No's. I and 2 were approved by the City
Manager in a total amount of $27,699.00. Contract Change Order No. 3 was approved by
the City Council on September 26, 1995 in the amount of $12,000.00. The total contract
cost was $311,268.50. This project is a Capital Improvement Project and was funded by an
operating transfer from the General Fund.
Attachments:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bond
3. Contractor's Affidavit
r: ~agdrpt\95 ~ 1128~pw93-09
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CiTY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SPACE
ABOVE THIS LINE FOR
RECORDER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Kunze, Inc. to perform the
following work of improvement: PW93-09 Parkview Site Rough Grading Improvements
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was
accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on November
28, 1995. That upon said contract the TIG Premier Insurance Company was surety for the bond given
by the said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows:
PROJECT PW93-09.
6. The street address of said property is: the northerly side of Pauba Road between La
Primavera Street and Showalter Road, CITY OF TEMECULA.
Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of
· 1995.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of
,1995.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
r:~cip~projects\pw93\pw93-O9,\completn.not
Bond No. TPI 03890099
CITY OF TEMECULA. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
pROJECT NO. PW93-09
PARKVIEW SITE ROUGH GRADING IMPROVEMENTS
RECEIV"
NOV O 9 lr"35 :'
CITY OF TEMEC:, !. ~
ENGINEERtNG DEPAR'~ i,,;:r,~i
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRF..SENTS THAT:
Kunze, Inc. 17480 La Sierra Avenue, ._Riverside, CA 9250.3 N~ME AND ADDRESS OF CONTtMCTOR
a Corporation , hereinafter called Principal, and
' (fiTI i~ whether a Corporalion, parmarshtp or lnO1vMudl
TIG Premier Insurance Company, 70 W. Michigan, _B.attle 'Cre. ek, MI 490ib__~
- NAME AND ADDRESS 01; SURETY
hereinefter called SURETY, ere held end firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
herelrmftercalledOWNER,jfithePefialsumof Thirty One Thousand One Hundred Twenty
I~LI~R$ lid 00
Seven and 00(100ths ...........
CENTS 14 31,127.00 . _ ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not. le~s
than ten percent (10%)' at the Contract value payable by the said City of TameGala under the
terms o1 the Contract, for the payment of which, 'we bind ourselveS. successors end assigns,
jointly and severally, firmly by these pre~ente.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain
Contract with the OWNER, dated the 8th day of August .19 9_5_. · copy of which i~
heralD attached and made a part hereof ~or the construction 0f pROJECT NO. PW93-O9
PARKVIEW SITE ROUGH GRADING IMPROVEMENTS.
WHEREAS, ~eid Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the period of ~ year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER, against
ell detects in wort<manship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and
WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was epproved on October 26 ,
19 9,_~,5.
NOW, THEREFORE. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION lS SUCH, that if within one year from
the date of approve! of the said Contract. the work done under the terms of said Contract shell
disease poor workmanship in the execution Of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said
Contract, or it shell appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation
shall remain In full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void,
MAINTENANCE BOND M-I
----. Signed and seeled this 27t..__b_h day of _.. October ,1995__-
(Seal)
TIC Premier Insurance Company
Attorne¥-in_-Fac t
{Title}
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorton, City Attorney
By:
{Name)
(Title)
MAINTENANCE BOND M-Z
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 59~7
State of cm,~
County of RIVERSIDE
On - NOVEv~ER 2, 1995
DATE
personally appeared
[] personally known to me -:01'1
before me, SANDY FRLT,y, NOTARY PUBLIC
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC*
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
[] proved to mc on tho baP.,ic of cat~faetory ovidonoo
to be the person(~ whose nameCl<) is/are-
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/ohc,/thcy executed
the same in his/hor/thcir authorized
capacity(-L-,s)-, and that by his/hcr/thcir
signature(~ on the instrument the person(~,
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(~ acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
SIGNATL~E OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law,. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[] INDIVIDUAL'
[] 'CORPORATE OFFICER
PP, ESTD:EIfr
Trrus(s)
[] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
[] GENERAL
[] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
TWO
NUMBER OF PAGES
10/27/95
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
KUNZE INC
A'ITORNE"/-IN-FACT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
C1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of_ California
County of
On October 27, 1995
personally appeared
[~l personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/she/they executed
' ~c~,'%~ ~ ' "' ~,~2",'¢~ ""~" '" =
WITNESS my hand and offidal seal.
-" ~ OPTIONAL
I
ThOugh the data below Is not required by law, tt may prove valueDie to persons relying on the dct, ument and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form,
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
[] PARTNER(S) [] UMITED
[] GENERAL
~ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
E3 TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Maintenance Bond
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOOUMENT
Two
NUMBER OF PAGES
10/27/95
DATE OF DOCUMENT
993 NATIONAl, NOTARY AEr~)CIATION, 823e Reinmet A~I. P.O, Box ? 184 * Oanogl
~--p&
P~e~ Of Atrophy v81 $~ only ~e n~e~ ~n ~e~:
KnOw All Men by ~e Present, ~ ~G Premier I~mce Compcy, a =o~ormi~ duly orpn~zed
and existing under ~ awe of ~ See of ~lif~n~, md ~ng i~ aminis~/tive office in Baffle
Creek, ~lhom Co~, Michi~, does by ~ese presen~ ~e. cottage md ~poim
RANDALL R. SPOHN
of ANAHEIN and State of CAT.TFORNTA its true
and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name. place and stead.
to execute, acknowled and deliver
CONTRACT ~ONDS GUARANTEE
(S.B.A. AGKEEMENT) - HAXII~U~ PENALTY $1,000,000.00
OTIiER CONTRACT BONDS - NAXIffiJH PENALTY $175,000.00
ALL OTHER BONDS - HAXIN1.~I PENALTY $25,000.00
"THIS POKER OF ATTORNEY SHALL TEP, HINATE AND BE
OF NO FURTHER EFFECT AFTER DECEMBER 31, 1995"
and to bind the Cornpiny ~erlby Is fully and to the me extent Is if such bonds were signed by the
President, lealed with the torporIts sIN of the Conq}any and duly attested by its Secretary, hereby
ratifying and confirming Ill that the Mid Attorney(s)-in-Psct ely do in the premise~ Said ap ointment
is rnlde under and b authority of Section 35 of the bylaws, Is Iraended, and duly adopted ~y the Board
of Directors o the YrlG Premier Insurance Company. f
"Be It Resolved, that the President, any Vice-President any Secretmy or any-Assistant Secretary 'ihall be
and is hereby vested with full power and author' to point any or more suitable persons as Attorney(s)-
in-Fact to represent and act for and on behalf ;r~f ~e ~oFmpany subject to the following provisions:
"Section 1. Attorney-in-Fact Attorney-in-Fact rnly be given full power and authority for and in the name
of and on behalf of the Company, to execute, acknowledge and deliver, any and all bonds· recognizances,
contracts, agreements of m, consents of surety and other conditional or obligatory undertakings
and Iny and all notices and documents canoeling or terminating the Company's lilbility thereunder, and
any such instruments so executed by Iny such Attorney-in-Fact eMIl be binding upon the Company as
if signed by the President and. sealed and attested by the Corporate Secretary."
in Witness Whereof, TIG Premier Insurance Company has caused these presents to be signed by its
and its corporate seal to be hereto
·AD., 19 94
· in fie year 1994
· a notary public, personalIt;
, personally known
to me to be fie person who executed fie within instrument as VICE PRESIDENT
on behalf of fie corporation therein named and ackn uted it
~ANCY I. RAYMOND
I Notary Public
I, fie undersigned Secretary of TIG Premier Insurance Company hereby certify that the above end foregoing
is a full· true and correct co y of fie Original Power of Attorney issued by said Company, and do hereby
f~ certify that the Mid ~oYwer of Attorney is still in force and effect
And I do hereby further certify thlt fie Certification of this Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by
facsimile under and ob~/the authority of Section 30 of the bylaws. as amended. and duty ,doEted by the
Board of Directors the TIG Premier Insurance Company and that said Section 30 of said ylaws has
not Dean ended or repealed as of the date hereof;
"Resolved, tit fie signature of the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of this Corporation, and
the seal of fie Corporation, may be affixed or printed by facsimile to any certificate to a Power
of Attorney of this Corporation, and that such printed fitsimile signature and seal shall be valid
and binding upon this Corporation"
GIVEN under my hand and the seal of said Company, this 27th
19 95
THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY EFFECTIVE ONLY IF
ATTACHED TO BOND NO. TPI 03890099
day of
SlcPltlry
October
30024 C 01-94
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'$ AFRDAVIT AND RNAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW93-09
PARKVIEW SITE ROUGH GRADING IMPROVEMENTS
This is to certify that ~z~. ]~;C , (hereinafter the
"CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/it has paid in full for all
materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the
CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in
contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building,
erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO.
PW93-09 situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as
follows:
PARKVIEW SITE ROUGH GRADING IMPROVEMENTS
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description
Dollar Amount to Dispute
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Dated:
N~: 1995
CONTRACTOR
By:- ~ ~
Signature
]~ Kf.~zR /
Print Name end Title
RELEASE R-1
ITEM 8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Substitute Agreement and Bonds for Traffic Signalization
Mitigation Fees in Parcel Maps No. 23561-1 and 23561-2.
(E/o Jefferson Avenue N/o Santa Gertrudis Creek)
PREPARED BY:/~. Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer
7~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ACCEPT the substitute agreement and bond for Traffic Signal Mitigation
Fees in Parcel Maps No. 23561-1 and 23561-2, AUTHORIZE the release of the Traffic Signal
Mitigation Fee bond on file, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the developers and
sureties.
BACKGROUND:
The County of Riverside approved Parcel Map No. 23561-1 on June 13, 1989, and the City
Council approved Parcel Map No. 23561-2 on December 4, 1990.
As a condition of the approval of these maps, an agreement to assure the payment of'
Traffic Signalization Mitigation fees was executed for each development. Where
securities are posted in accordance with the agreements, these securities are generally
held in full until all of the parcel owner/developers have paid the pertinent traffic signalization
mitigation fees. This may require several years to accomplish in industrial park developments
where a number of builders may develop on but one parcel of many in the overall
development.
Bedford Development Co. did not post a Traffic Signal Mitigation bond with the County for
Parcel Map No. 23561-1, but did post a bond with the City for Parcel Map No. 23561-2 as
follows:
Bond No. 3S 743 459 00 in the amoun~ of $62,072.50 with Lumbermens Mutual
Casualty Co. as surety.
- 1 - r:~agdrpt\95~, 1128~TRAFSIGM .FEE
Bedford Development Company (Now Kemper Real Estate Management Co.) has sold their
remaining parcels in these developments and in accord with their sales agreement and the City
Attorney's direction to replace both the agreements and securities, the following buyer has
posted the security to cover those parcels for which no traffic signal mitigation have been paid
in the two phases:
North Jefferson Properties, Partnership
(Comprised of Hoff Investments, Limited Partner, and PMD Investments, Limited Partner)
25792 Obrero Road
Mission Viejo, CA 92691-9125
and the American Motorists Insurance Company as surety posted the following bond:
Bond No. 3SM 806 937 00 in the amount of $57,400.00
Staff recommends that the City Council accept in substitution both the agreement and bond
as submitted and authorize the release of the bond on file for Parcel Map No. 23561-2.
All other contractual obligations for public improvements have been completed and the
warranty, labor and materials, and subdivision monument bonds for both phases have
been released by City Council action.
The several public streets have been accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by
Resolution No. 95-34.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
· 2. Substitute Agreement (On file)
3. Substitute Bond (On file)
-2- r:~agdzpt\95~1128~TRAFSIGM.FEE
// .." .
//// ~ '
t.. ///
// .-. ·
"' ..
c-p,.o
F-i. ivl.'N O.J~.gE,'r32-2
P.M. J '47./3 - ,e
PARCEL MAPS NO. 23561-1 & 23561-2
Location
Map
ITEM 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and
Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22715-1. (Southwesterly of
intersection of Rancho California Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
PREPARED BY: ~ Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer
~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor
and Material bonds for Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the
Subdivision Monumentation Bond, in Tract. No. 22715-1, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so
advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and .the Surety..
BACKGROUND:
On August 1, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Cosrain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA.92660
for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and
subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds
issued by American Home Assurance Company as follows:
Bond No. PB300 11 131 in the amount of $1,104,000to cover street/drainage
improvements.
2. Bond No. PB300 11 131 in the amount of $32,000to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB300 11 131 in the amount of $26,000to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. PB300 11 131 in the amount of $581,000to cover material and labor for
street, water, and sewer improvements.-
r: ~agd~t~95\ 1128\tr227151 .r~l
Bond No. PB300 11 132 in the amount of $9,000 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Effective December 31, 1993, Cosrain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture
partnership. The name of the new partnership is TAYCO, a California General Partnership
(comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and
Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement was executed by
the partnership and riders to the Bonds, changing the obligee from the County to the City,
the .Principal from Tayco to TAYCO, and reducing the Faithful Performance bond amounts,
have been submitted for City Council acceptance.
On July 12, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-
year warranty period, and authorized the reduction in faithful performance bond to the
following warranty amount:
Streets/Drainage, Water and Sewer:
Bond No. PB 300 11 131
$116,200
Public Works Staff has reviewed the project end all necessary repairs/replacements have
been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommends that
the Faithful Performance warranty bond be released.
The developer is also required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to
suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time
determined by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted
the public improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims
have been filed with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and
Material Bond posted by American Home Assurance Co. be released:
Bond No. PB300 11 131 in the amount of $581,000
The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been
completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release
of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond
· as follows:
Bond No. PB300 11 132 in the amount of $9,000.
The affected streets are a portion of Butterfield Stage Road, Rancho California Road, and
Calle Resaca. These streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by
Resolution 94-82.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None by this action.
These streets have been integrated into the City;s Pavement Management System and will
receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement
condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments
for 5 to 8 years.
Attachment:
Location Map
r:~agdq~t\95\1128\tr227151 .r¢l
NoT:
TRACT
NO.
22715-1
Location
Map
I'I'EM 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Award of Contract for the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for the construction of the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 to
Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction for $1,716,637.50and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $171,663.75which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the
Walcott Corridor Project. -
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and authorized the
· Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Walcott Corridor Project,
PW94-'10. This project will provide an all weather surface road (two travel lanes) from Nicolas
Road to La Serena Way by way of Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos, and Walcott Road. The
existing grades of all the streets throughout the project will be raised and lowered to construct
a smooth road alignment. The proposed new grades will require Rancho California Water
District to relocate their existing water main in Walcott Lane and Calle Chapos. The cost for
the relocation will be reimbursed to the City by R.C.W.D. The bid also includes an alternative
bid to refurbish the existing 30" water main instead of installing an entirely new main line.
The engineer's estimate for the street improvements and water main relocation is $1,583,000
and $837,000, respectively. This brings the total estimated project .cost to $2,420,000.
Staff has complete the Initial Environmental Study (IES) and pursuant to the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as
proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a s!gnificant impact upon the environment. As
a result, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Negative Declaration and
approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for this project. Eleven (11 ) bids for the project were ·
publicly opened on August 24, 1995 and the results for the base bid are as follows:
pwO4~agdrpfi95~1128\pw94-10.awd
Base Bid
1. Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc.
dba Genesis Construction ................. $1,716,637.50
2. Utah Pacific Construction, Company ......... $1,905,175.00
3. TNT Grading Inc ....................... $1,905,523.43
4. Paul Hubbs Construction Co., Inc ............ $1,927,655.70
5. C.A. Rasmussen, Inc .................... $1,955,190.70
6. Greg J. Harris Construction ............... $1,963,896.80
7. American COntracting, Inc ................ $1,972,284.15
8. Highgrade Engineering, Inc'. ............... $1,985,715.25
9. Commercial Contractors, Inc. dba.
Commercial Contractors Western Division., Inc.. $2,124,435.81
10. Vance Corporation ..................... $2,268,778.29
11. J. R. Pipeline Co., Inc .................... $2,389,004.25
The bid results were reviewed with Rancho California Water District and it is recommended
that the least costly option of installing new pipe be awarded. The total cost of the water
facilities is $647,453.00 and is included in the base bid shown above for Genesis
Construction.
Staff reviewed the bid proposal from Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis
Construction and found that the proposal was complete and in order. Hemet Manufacturing
Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction has not performed any work for the City, but has
performed well in other areas of Riverside County based on comments from references of
previous work.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IM'PACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded by Measure A and Development
Impact Fees. The water main improvements will be paid for by R.C.W.D. Funds are available
for the construction contract of $1,716,637.50 and the contingency of $171,663.75 for a
total of construction cost of $1,888,301.25. R.C.W.D. will reimburse the City $647,453.00.
Attachment:
Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction Contract
Notice of Proposed Negative Declaration _
Mitigation Monitoring Program
pwO4%agdq~t\95%1128\pw94-10.awd
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW94.- 10
WAL CO TT CORRIDOR
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 28th day of November, 1995, by and between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Hernet
Manufacturing Company, Inc. dbe Genesis Conai~dction, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW94-10
WALCOTT CORRIDOR, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and
amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications (1992 Ed.) where' specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT
NO. PW94-10 WALCOTT CORRIDOR. Copies of these Standard Specifications are
available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will COntrOl the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW94-10 WALCOTT CORRIDOR.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the
other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting
portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of_the work in general terms, but not in complete
detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and
that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR
shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved
in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip\projects%pw94-10\contract
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding
as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall
be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility
and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW94-10 WALCOTT CORRIDOR
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with
the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove
enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work
performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY
or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept
in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: ONE MILLION SEVEN
HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN DOLLARS and FIFTY CENTS
($1,716,637.50),the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed one hundred & eighty (180)
working days, commencing. with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not
commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City
Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions
to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council.
6. PAYMENTS.
· UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
· Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after
submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal
to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule.
Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each
successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any
part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final
payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final
Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied
by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is
demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the
amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments
on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
CONTRACT CA-2 r:~cip\projects\pw94-10\contrect
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant
to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is
hereby incorporated by reference.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the
CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and
correction of construction deficiencies according to the.following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
925,000-975,000
975,000-9500,000
Over 9500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
92,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
910,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of 9500,000
e
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section
53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars
(91,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed
pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due
to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to
or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will
not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without
the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR
is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above,
CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to
the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance
by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related
to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity
agreement with each claim for payment.
10.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor
Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY,
as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer,
worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done
under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of
CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip\projects~pw94-10\contract
the Contract.
11.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
13.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
14.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
.Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
'affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
16.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
17.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
18.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects~pw94-10\contract
19.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
21.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first
above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip\projects~pw94-10~contract
City of Temecula
Planning Department
PROJECT:
Notice of Proposed Negative Declaration
APPLICANT:
Walcott Corridor Street Improvements (PW94-10).
City of Temecula Public Works Department.
RECEIVEL.,
AUG 0 9 1,995
C;7'¢ OF
ENGINEERING DEPARTIJE.NT
LOCATION:
.Nicolas Road to Calle Girasol to Calle Chapos to Walcort Road.
DESCRIFTION:
The construction of a two lane (32 foot wide pavement) road connecting Nicolas
Road to La Serena Way.
The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based
upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this
project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment.
As a result, the City Council intends to adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation
Monitoring Program for this project on September 12, 1995.
The Comment Period for this proposed Negative Declaration is August 14, 1995 to September 5,
1995. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed
below at the following address: City of Temecula, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA
92590.
The public notice of the intent to adopt this Negative Declaration is provided through:
X The Local Newspaper. X Posting the Site. X Notice to Adjacent Property Owners.
If you need 'additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact
~'~e and Title)
R:\FAGANNI\ENVIRONXXVALCOTT.pND 8~8~95 mf
City of Temecula
Pl3nning Department
Initial Environmental Study
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Name of Project:
2. Case Numbers:
3. Location of Project:
4. Description of Project:
5. Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Name of Proponent:
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
Walcott Corridor Sweet Improvements
PW94-10
Nicolas Road to Calle Girasol to Calle Chapos to Walcott Road
The construction of a two lane (32 foot wide pavement) road
connecting Nicolas Road to La Serena Way
August 4, 1995
City of Temecula Public Works Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 694-6411
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section HI)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures?
b,
Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering
of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
d: The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
e,
Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
f. Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion?
The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRP'BWALCOTT.IS 814195 klb 1
Yes Maybe N__o
h,
Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
i. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
C,
Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any
change in climate, whether locally or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
a,
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b,
Changes in absorption rates, drainage panems, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff?.
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the mount of surface water in any water body?
eo
Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not limited w, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g,
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
h,
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:XSTAFFRPT~WALCOT'F.I$ $14195 klb 2
Yes Maybe N_.9.o
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique; rare, threatened, or
endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthic organisms, and/or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals?
c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area?
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations?
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare?
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area?
b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described
in a community or general plan?
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCO'Ff. IS 8/4/95 klb 3
Yes
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal' result in:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous
substances includes, but is not limited to, pesticides, chemicals,
oil or radiation)? __
b. The use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticicles, chemicals,
or radiation)? _
c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan? __
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population of an area7 _
12. Homing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand
for additional housing7
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? __
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including
public transportation? __
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? X
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
Maybe
X
X
X
N_.q
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:~STAFFRFI~WALCOTr.lS 8/4/95 lab 4
Yes Maybe N_9.o
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X
f. Other governmental services: __
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? __
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new sources of energy? __
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? __
b. Communications systems? _
c. Water systems? __
d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? __
e. Storm water drainage systems? X
f. Solid waste disposal systems? __
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of
utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? _
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? __
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic pollutant emissions? __
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? __
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? __
c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area? __
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities? __
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS 8/4195 klb 5
20.
Cultural Resources.
C,
d,
Will the proposal result-in:
The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site?
Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique .ethnic cultural values?
Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area7 '
Yes Maybe _No
_ x ]
X
X
X
R:XSTAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS 8/4/95 klb 6
HI. DISCUSSION OF ~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Earth
l.a.
No. The proposal will not result in unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures.
Any potential unstable conditions shall be mitigated through planting of slopes for erosion control
(consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and Ordinance No. 457) and through proper
compaction of the soils. Construction and grading for this development will not be at depths which
would affect any geologic substructures. No impacts are foreseen as a result of this project.
1.b.
Yes. The proposal will result in the disruption, displacement, compaction, or overcovering of the
soil. The project will require grading, and all grading activity requires disruptions, displacements,
compaction and overcovering of the soil. Cut and fill slopes will be created, as well as additional
roadway. The mount of disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of the soil will
be the minimum amount needed to realize the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
1.C.
Yes. The proposal will result in a change in the site topography and ground surface relief features.
As discussed in response l.b., only the minimum amount of Fading necessary to create the
roadway (including cut and fill areas) will be conducted. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
1.d.
No. The proposal will not result in 'the destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical futures. No unique geologic features exist on the site. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project:
1 .e,f.
Yes. This project will result in increased wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site and
in changes in siltation, deposition, and erosion. Grading will occur during the construction phase
for the project. The potential for wind and water erosions of soil will increase from the creation
of manufactured slopes. Short-term impacts will be mitigated through grading techniques that are
consistent with Air Quality regulations and best grading practices. Long-term impacts will be
mitigated through slope landscaping and the construction of the roadway. Erosion control measures
will be implemented and will have to be consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and
Ordinance No. 457. Ordinance No. 457 has requirements for plant types and spacing which
provides erosion control that will be effective. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
l.g.
Yes. The proposal will result in minor modifications to several existing drainage channels.
According to the Hydrology and Hydraulics Report for the Walcott Corridor (prepared by Robert
Bein, William Frost and Associates dated December, 1994), the Walcott Lane segment of the
corridor will cross four existing stream beds. Storm drain facilities will be installed at each of
these locations. The Report further states that an existing stream traverses Calle Chapos at four
separate locations. The proposed improvements will limit the stream crossing to two locations
along Calle Chapos. Prior to any modification to the channel, clearances will need to be obtained
from the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game. This will
assure that any potential impacts are mitigated to a level less than significant. The project will not
result in modifications to any wash, creek, river or lake since none are proximate to the site. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS 814195 klb 7
l.h.
l.i.
Air
2.a,b.
2.c.
Water
3.a.
3.b,
3.c.
3.d.
Maybe. Development of the project may expose people and property to earthquake hazards
because the project is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. The
project does not include any habitable structures; however, as discussed in responses I 1 and 12,
the project is growth inducing. The project will not expose people or property'to geologic hazards
such as landslides, mudslides, ground failure or liquefaction. No known landslides are located on
the site or proximate to the site. The same is true for mudslides. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The proposal does not include development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone as
identified by the State of California, Resource Agency Department of Conservation Special Studies
Zone Map. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Yes. The project will result in increased air emissions and has a potential to deteriorate ambient
air quality in the short-run. Air emissions and objectionable odors will probably occur during the
construction phase of the project. These impacts will be of short duration and are not considered
significant. The General Plan Final EIR (page 11) states Air Quality is regionally significant, but
locally mitigated to a level of insignificance. Therefore, although there will be additional air
emissions, there will be no deterioration of ambient air quality locally in the long run. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The project will not result in alterations of air movement, temperature, or moisture, or in any
change in climate either locally or regionally. The scale of the project precludes it from creating
any significant impacts. on the environment in this area.
Yes. The proposal will result in changes to currents, and in changes to the course or direction of
water movements in flesh waters. Modifications are proposed to an unnamed draw that traverses
Calle Chapos at four separate locations. The proposed improvements will modify the draw,
limiting the crossing to two locations (reference response 1.b). The modifications will not be
significant, therefore; no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Yes. The proposal will result .in changes to absorption rates, drainage panems and the rate and
amount of surface runoff. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by
construction of the roadway. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, impacts shall
be mitigated through the numerous drainage improvements that are included as part of this project.
Any graded slopes will be planted to prevent erosion and additional runoff. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The proposal will not result ih alterations to the course or flow of flood waters. The project
is not located adjacent to the one hundred year flood plain, is'not located within an identified
floodway and is not within the Dam Inundation area identified in Figure 74 of the City of
Temecula General Plan. No significant impacts_are anticipated as a result of this project.
Maybe. The proposal could result in a change in the amount of surface water in any waterbody.
As mentioned above under response 3.a., modifications are proposed to an unnamed draw that
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS 8/4t95 lab 8
traverses Calle Chapos at four separate locations. Surfaces will be rendered impervious as a result
of this project and any residential- development that occurs as a result of the project and this could
result in an increase in amount and velocity of surface water in the draws. Any potential impacts
will be mitigated through drainage conveyances which are proposed to be included as part of the
project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.e.
lVlaybe. The proposal could result in discharges into surface waters or in any alteration of surface
water quality. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the project, the applicant will have to
comply with the provisions of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit
from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES
Notice of Intent has been fried or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the
NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less .than significant.
Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.f.
No. The proposal will not result in an alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwaters.
Construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground
waters. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.g.
3.h.
No. The proposal will not result in a change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations. Reference
response 3.f. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The project will not result in the reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for
public water supplies. The project does not propose any use that would generate a need for water
provision. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.i.
No. The proposal will not expose people or property to water related hazards such as flooding.
Reference response 3 .d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Plant Life
4.a,b.
Maybe. The proposal may- result in a change to the diversity of species, or number of any native'
species of plants, in a reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered
species of plants and in the creation of a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species on-
site. According to Page 6 of the Biological Resources Study: Waltoil Corridor Street Improvement
(dated August 26, 1994) prepared by SJM Biological Consultants, dated December 4, 1994,
portions of the site are covered by Coastal Sage Scrub and riparian plant communities. Mitigation
measures for the Gnatcatcher shall include construction of Walcott Lane to be done outside the
usual nesting season of the Gnatcatcher. Mitigation measures in place during the construction phase
shall include erosion control measures and staking areas that construction vehicles shall be
prohibited from entering/disturbing. The Report concludes on page 9, any impacts to the stream
crossing Walcon Lane could reqtfire a 1601 streambed alteration agreement from the California
Department of Fish and Game. If required, the permit application will be accompanied by a
mitigation plan which normally includes site restoration. As a result of these mitigation measures,
no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRF~WALCOTT.IS 8/4195 k. lb 9
4.c.
Yes. The project will result in the introduction of new species of plants into an area of native
vegetation and cream a barrier to. the normal replenishment of existing species. Most of the area
is already disturbed and is currently being used as a roadway. Slopes graded for the project will
need to be planted for erosion control, and this will introduce non-native species to the area. This
planting will be adjacent to an area that has previously been disturbed. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
4.d.
No. The project will not result in a reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop. The City
of Temecula Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) did not identify the site as farmland of
local importance. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Animal Life
5.a,b,d,e.
Maybe. The project may result in a change in the diversity of species, or numbers of species of
animals. The project site does lie within the Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan Fee
Area. According to Appendix A of the Biological Resources Study: Walcott Corridor Street
Improvement (dated August 26, 1994) signs of SKR were not found within the limits of the project
right-of-way. For other species, reference the responses to 4.a. and 4.b. above. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.c.
No. The proposal will not result in the introduction of any new wildlife species into the area.
Projects of this nature do not introduce new wildlife species into the area. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
Noise
6.a.
Yes. The proposal could result in increases to existing noise levels from increased traffic since the
road is currently unimproved (din). In addition,. noise levels will increase during the construction
.phase of the project. The Walcott Corridor is not identified as a roadway that will produce
-significant noise beyond the right-of-way at buildout of the City according to Figure 8-5 of the
City's General Plan (Future Roadway Noise Contours). No significant impacts from noise are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Yes. The project will expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction
phase. Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100
feet which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure.
This source of noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. As
discussed in response 6.a., vehicle noise will not affect any sensitive receptors in the area. No
significant impacts are anticipated either in the short- or long-run.
6.c.
Yes. The proposal will result in the exposure of people to severe vibrations during the
development/construction phase. 'The vibrations will be of short duration and therefore are not
considered significant. The proposal will not result in the exposure of people to severe vibrations
over the long-run. No significant impacts are anticipated either in the short or long run.
R:\STAFFP, PT~WALCO~'r.13 8/4/95 klb lO
Light and Glare
,
Yes. The proposal will ultimately produce and result in additional sources of light and glare. It
is anticipated that additional night vehicle trips' will be generated on the improved roadway.
Motorists traveling at night will use their headlamps to illuminate the roadway. Some stray
illumination may reflect upon houses in the area. This illumination of the roadway is not
considered significant. Street lamps are not proposed as pan of the project. No significant impacts
are foreseen from light and glare.
Land Use
8.a.
Maybe. The proposal may alter the present land use of the area since there are undeveloped
parcels in the area. With the improvement of the Walcott Corridor, some of the land owners may
be motivated to develop their parcels. Currently, people interested in subdividing their property
are required to improve their property to a City maintained road. This means improving portions
of the Walcott Corridor. This has proven to be cost prohibitive for small subdivisions. Vacant
parcels have the potential to be developed with the improvements included in this project. Because
of the General Plan land use designation of properties in the vicinity of the area (low-medium
density residential, 3-6 dwelling units/acre and very low density residential, .2-.4 dwelling units
per acre) the impacts will be negligible. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
8.b.
No. The proposal will not result in an alteration to the future planned land use in the vicinity of
the project as described City's General Plan. The General Plan Land Use designations for
properties in the vicinity of the project are (low-medium density residential, 3-6 dwelling units/acre
and very low density residential, .2-.4 dwelling units per acre). No changes to the General Plan
Land Use Designations are proposed as a result of this project. The General Plan Circulation Plan
identifies the Walcott Corridor as a Optional Rural Arterial Highway and this is how the project
is going to be developed. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Natural Resources
9.a,b.
Yes. The proposal will result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource and the
depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in a minor. incremental
increase in the rate of use of natural resources (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation,
asphalt, etc.) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the
scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen as significant.
Risk of Upset
lO.a,b.
Maybe. The proposal may result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upiet conditions. The project is a proposal to pave a currently
unimproved roadway. As a result of the roadway improvements, traffic will increase on the
Walcott Corridor. The increase in traffic may result in the increase in the probability of risk of
explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset
conditions. The same is true for the use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials. Due to the limited traffic which is expected from this project, and the fact that the
Walcott Corridor is not identified as a truck route, no significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\STAFFRFBWALCOTr. IS 8/4/95 klb 1 I
10.c.
No. The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation
plan. With the addition of a fire station east of Interstate 15, existing emergency response plans
and/or emergency evaluation plans will be enhanced through the contribution of an all-weather road
in this area. No significant impacts are anticipau-~d as a result of this project.
Population
11.
Maybe. The project may result in altering the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the
human population of the area. Reference response 8.a. and 8.b. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Homing
12.
Maybe. Reference response 11. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Transportation/Circulation
13.a.
No. The proposal will not result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movement.
Vehicular traffic is anticipated to increase became the roadway will be improved from dirt to
asphalt. The roadway will be twenty-eight (28) feet wide and is classified as an Optional Rural
Arterial Highway in the City's General Plan, and is not designed to carry substantial numbers of
vehicles. No significant impacts are expected from development of the site.
13.b.
No. The project will not result in an increased demand for new paricing. The project does not
propose any use that would generate a need for parking. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
13 .c.
No. The proposal will not create impacts upon existing transportation systems, including public
transportation. Walcott Corridor improvements are classified as Priority I in the City of Temecula
Capital Improvement Program 1996-2000. The scope of work is described as environmental
analysis, design and construction of an interim two lane roadway to extend from the intersection
of Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa to Calle Chapos to Calle Girasol to Walcott Road to La Serena
Way. Design of the improvements are slated for fiscal years 1994-95 and 1995-96 and construction
and administration in fiscal year 1995-96. This will provide an additional north-south route in this
portion of the City. No improvements to the public transportation systems are proposed in this
area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.d.
No. The proposal will not result in alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods. Currently, there is circulation or movement of people and/or goods in the
area. Vehicular traffic is anticipated to increase because the roadway will be improved from dirt
to asphalt; however, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.e.
No. The proposal will not result in alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic since none exists
currently in the proximity of the site and none are proposed. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFR.PT\WALCOTT.IS 8/4/95 klb
13 .f.
Yes. The proposal will result in an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians. Any increase in traffic by motor 'vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians will result in an
increase in traffic hazards. Current and future conditions are typical conditions that exist at any
interface between pedestrians, bicyclists and automobiles. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
Public Services
14.a,b..
No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire
protection or new or altered police protection. The project does not propose any use that would
generate a n.e~ed for new or altered fire or police protection. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
14.c,d.
No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
school facilities or new or altered parks or other recreational facilities. This project does not
propose any use that would generate a need for school facilities or new or altered parks or other
recreational facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.e.
Yes. The proposal will result in a need for the maintenance of public facilities, including roads.
Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City
of Temecula from the State of California and local assessments. Impacts to current and future
needs for maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site are incremental and are not
considered significant. This is because the Gasoline Tax and the local assessments are sufficient
to cover any of the proposed expenses. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
14.f.
No. The proposal will not have a substantial affect upon or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services. Reference response 14.e. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
Energy
15.a.
No. The proposal will not result in the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. As mentioned
in responses 9.a. and 9.b. the proposal may result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural
resource or the depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in an
increase in the rate of use of natural resources (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation,
asphalt, etc.) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the
nature of this project (a roadway), impacts are not seen as significant.
15.b.
No. The project will not result in a substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy,
nor will the project require the development of new sources of energy. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
'Utilities
16.a-d,f.
No. The proposal will not result in a need for ;~ew systems or substantial alterations to power or
natural gas, communication systems, water systems, sewer systems, solid waste disposal systems.
The project does not propose any use or uses that would generate in a need for these new systems
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.I$ 81.~195 klb 13
or substantial alterations to existing systems. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
16.e.
Yes. The proposal will result in a need for a minor addition to on-site storm water drainage
systems. Drainage conveyances will be required which will safely and adequately handle any of
the runoff which is created by the realization of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
16.g.
No. The proposal will not result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system
improvements for any of the above. (reference response No. 16.a-d,f.). No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Human Health
17.a,b.
No. The proposal will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard.
Projects of this nature do not result in the creation of health hazards or potential health hazards.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Aesthetics
18.a-c.
No. The proposal will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public,
in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view, or in detrimental visual
impacts on the surrounding area. The project is a proposal to pave a dirt road which is already
being used and for associated Fading that will be required by the project. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
Recreation
19.
No. The proposal will not result in impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational
resources or opportunities. .The project does not propose any use that would impact the quality
or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Cultural Resources
20.a.
Maybe. The proposal may result in the alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site or structure. The site has been previously disturbed. The City
General Plan identified this area as an "Area of Sensitivity for Archaeological Resources". Any
future impacts will be mitigated through the application of standard City paleontologic and
archaeologic development conditions. In addition, if needed, onsite archaeologic and Native
American heritage resource experts will monitor activities on the site." No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
20.b-d.
No. The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values. No "unique" ethnic cultural values have been identified on or in proximity
to the site. The proposal will not result in restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area. None currently exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRP'BWALCOTT.IS 8/4/95 Idb 14
IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
YeS
Maybe No
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal
species, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
X
Does the project have the potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals? (A short term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
X
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable7 (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is significant.)
X
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
R:\STAFFRPT~WALCO'I'r.I$ 8/4/95 Idb 15
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed projea could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and
in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will
mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Prepared by:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
ate
R:%,STAFFRF~WAI,COTT.IS 8/4/95 klb 1(5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBTECT:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manag-,~~,
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
August 30, 1995
Walcott Corridor Street Improvements (PW94-10) Negative
Mitigation Measures
Declaration
The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the mitigation measures for the Walcott Corridor
Street Improvements (PW94-10) which are identified in the Initial Environmental Study (IES) for the
project. The IES for development of the Walcott Corridor Street Improvements was completed on
July 31, 1995. The IES evaluated the potential for adverse environmental impacts and identified
several potentially significant impacts to the environment. The adverse impacts were in the areas
of earth, water, plant life, animal life and cultural resources. The Initial Environmental Study also
identified that these potentially significant impacts could be rnitigated to a level of insignificance
through the incorporation of certain features into the design of the project.
Listed below are the Mitigation Measures which must be incorporated into the project to reduce the
potentially significant impacts associated with this project. The impacts and mitigation measures are
as follows:
1. IMPACT:
An increase'in wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site and in
changes in siltation, deposition, and erosion.
MEASURE: Short-term impacts will be mitigamd through grading techniques that
are consistent with Air Quality regulations and best grading practices.
Long-term impacts will be mitigated through site landscaping and the '
construction of hardscape. Erosion control measures will have to be
consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and Ordinance No.
457.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Depatuuent of Public Works
2. IMPACT:
Minor modifications to several existing drainage channels and in
changes to the course or direction of water movements in fresh
waters.
MEASURE: Clearances will need to be obtained from the Army Corps of
Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Depmu~iefit of Public Works
R:\PL,ANN1NG'~WALCOTT.I~M 8/30/95 Ir. lb
IMPACT:
Changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and
mount of surface runoff and in the amount of surface water in any
waterbody.
MEASURE: Drainage conveyances shall be provided to safely and adequately
handle any of the runoff which is created by the project.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Department of Public Works
IMPACT:
MEASURE:
Discharges into surface waters which will result in alterations to
surfac~ water quaiity.
Comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources
Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES
Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Depa~m,ent of Public Works
IMPACT:
A change to the diversity of species, or number of any native species
of plants, in a reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare,
threatened, or endangered species of plants and in the creation of a
barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species on-site.
MEASURE: Construction of Walcott Lane shall be done outside the usual nesting
season of the Gnatcatcher. Further, erosion control measures and
staking areas for construction vehicles be prohibited from
entering/disturbing portions of the site which are covered by riparian
plant communities. Any impacts to the stream crossing Walcott Lane
could require a 1601 streambed alteration agreement and may need to
be accompanied by a mitigation plan which normally includes site
restoration from the California Department of Fish and Game.
IMPLEMENTING AGEN(~Y: Planni;~g Department and Depathuent of Public Works
6. IMPACT:
A change in the diversity of species, or numbers of species of
animals.
· MEASURE: See Measure for No. 4.
<,
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Planning Department and Depa~u,ent of Public Works
R:~PLANNING~WALCOTTJdEM 8/20/95 lab
IMPACT:
The proposal may result in the alteration or destruction of any
paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic site or su'ucture.
MEASURE:
When necessary, a paleonwlogist/archaeologist or representative shall
have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading
activity to allow recovery of fossils. Application of standard City
paleontologic and archaeologic development procedures. In addition,
if needed, onsite archaeologic and Native American heritage resource
experts will moniwr activities on the site.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: PIning Department and Depaxunent of Public Works
R: ~pLANN1NG~,WALCOTT.MEM .8/30/95 k, lb
ITEM 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRE '0
CITY MANAG~~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material,
Monument bonds in Tract No. 22715-2. (Northwesterly of
intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
and
the
PREPARED BY:/~. Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer
~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of ~=aithful Performance and Labor and Material
bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer Improvements, and the Subdivision Monumentation
Bond, in Tract No. 22715-2, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors, the Developer, and the Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On August 1, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Cosrain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by
American Home Assurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. PB 30011134in the amount of $472,000to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. PB 30011134 in the amount of $116,500 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 30011134 in the amount of '$100,500 to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. PB 30011134 in the amount of $344,500 to cover material and labor for
street, water, and sewer improvements._
5. Bond No. PB 30011135 in the amount of $24,600 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
r:~agdtpt~95\1128\tr227152.~1
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture
partnership. The nalne of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership
(comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor
Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the
partnership and riders to the Bonds have been submitted for City Council acceptance.
On April 26, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year
warranty period, and authorized the reduction in faithful performance bond to the following
warranty amount:
Streets/Drainage, Water and Sewer:
Bond No. PB 300 11 345 $ 68,900
Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have
been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommends that the
Faithful Performance warranty bond be released.
The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement or statute after the City Council has accepted the public
improvements. The contractual claim period has run and no claims have been filed with the
City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond posted by
American Assurance Company be released:
Bond No. PB 300 11 134 in the amount of $344,450.
The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been
completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of
the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows:
Bond No. PB300 11 135 in the amount of $24,600 to cover survey
monumentation.
The affected streets are Corte Coronado, Corte Chatada, San Vincente, and portions of
Butterfield Stage Road, Rancho Vista Road, Calle Resaca, Corte Santa Catalina, and Corte Las
Cruces. These streets will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution
No. 95- . Butterfield Stage Road in this area was accepted into the City Maintained-Street
System by Resolution No. 95-29.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachment:
Location Map
r:~agdrpt\95X1128Xtr227152.rd
l._4AIr. J,' O r..jLJFOl. J,lla .~OJO yr
~27:'5.- t A~7~ 2.'-,"5' f''5'~' '~°~'~
PROJECT SITE
VICINITY MAP
TRACT NO. 22715- 2-
Location Map
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
AcceptanCe of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tracts No. 22715-2, and 22715-F). (Northwesterly of
intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho Vista Road).
PREPARED BY:/~k~ Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer
,~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACTS NO. 22715-2, and 22715-F)
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tracts No. 22715-2 on August 1, 1.989,
21, 1989, and Tracts No. 22715-F on September 12, 1989, and entered into subdivision
'agreements for the improvement of streets and drainage, sewer and water systems, and
survey monumentation with:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
The developer has improved, to City standards, the public improvements in accord
with the subdivision agreements. The City Council previously accepted the
public improvements, and released the Labor and Material and the Survey
monumentation Bonds. The Public Works Department recommends release of the
Faithful Performance Improvement Warranty securities as all required maintenance and
repairs have been satisfactorily completed.
Under provisions of the Streets and Highways Code (Section 1806), public streets
offered by the subdivider must be accepted by City Council resolution in order to be
r:\agdrpt~95\l 128\tr227156.sts
included in the public-street maintained system.
The streets so affected are Corte Coronado, Corte Chatada, Corte Las Cruces, Corte Santa
Catalina, San Vincente, and portions of Rancho Vista Road, Butterfield Stage Road, and Calle
Resaca. This portion of Butterfield Stage Road was accepted into the City Maintained-Street
System by Resolution No. 95-29.
Inasmuch as certain state funds are earmarked for maintenance of these publicly-maintained
streets, the process will make these streets eligible for those funds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These streets wil! be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will
receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement
condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural
treatments for 7 to 10 years.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
r:~agdrpt~95\1128~tr227156 .sts
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TF_2VIECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACC~G CERTAIN
PUBLIC STREETS INTO THECITY-MAINTAINED STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 2271~-2, and 22715-F.) ·
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TElVIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)
(Now Tayco, a California General Partnership comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California
Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation),
offered for dedication to the County of Riverside certain streets within Tracts No. 22715-2 and
22715-F, for public street and public utility purposes, and said County of Riverside accepted said
offers of dedication by Board of Supervisors action on August 1, 1989, (Tract No. 22715-2),
and September 12, 1989, (Tract No. 22715-F).
WHEREAS, The City of Temecuh became successors-in-interest to the County of
Riverside upon incorporation, effective December 1, 1989.
WltF~RF~AS, Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes,
Inc.)(Now Tayco, a California General hrtnership comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes
California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California
Corporation) has improved to City standards, public improvements within the several streets
offered for dedication withhi Tracts No. 22715-2, and 22715-F, the legal descriptions of which
are set forth in Exhibit "A" and are depicted in Exhibit ~B~.
WBF~REAS, the City desires to accept into the City-maintained street system the public
improvements within all or portions of the public streets offered to and accepted by the County
of Riverside as depicted in Exhibit "B" ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Section' 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City-maintained street system
those streets or portions of public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside
described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the
streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside, into the City-
maintained street system as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTI~J), by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of November, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
r:XagdrptX95~1128\tr227156.sts
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMF~ULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of November, 1995, by the
foilowing vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCn,M MBERS:
ABSENT: -
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: -
CO~CKlVlEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt\95~1128\tr227156.sts
~XRIB1T "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-
Accepting the public streets offered to and
accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated
on Tram No. 22715-2, and 22715-F, and
accepting subject public streets into the City-
Maintained-Street System as described below:
A. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "H" inclusive,
as shown on Tract No. 22715-2, f'ded 16 August 1989, in
Book 205 of Maps, Pgs 5965, further described as follows:
(lot *An)
(Lot "B*)*
(Lot "C*)
(Lot "D")
(Lot hen)
(Lot nF*)
(Lot "Gn)
(Lot "H")
Portion of Ranclio Vista Road
Portion of Butterfield Stage Road
Portion of Calle Resaca
Corte Chatada
Corte San Vinccnte
Corte Coronado
Portion of Corte Santa Catalina
Portion of Corte Las Cruces
B. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "D" inclusive,
as shown on Tract 22715-F, fled 14 September 1989, in Book
206 of Maps, Pgs 75-79, further described as follows:
(Lot "A")
(Lot "B")*
(Lot "C")
(Lot "D")
Portion of Rancho Vista Road
Portion of Butterfield Stage Road
Portion of Corte Las Cruces
Portion of Corte Santa Catalina
* Butterfield Stage Road was accepted into the City Maintained-Street System in this area
by Resolution No. 95-29.
r:\agdrpt\95\1128\tr227156 .sts
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- .
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED
STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
T .EGE~rD
S'T'R.E_rC$ O1~ PORTLONS OF
TO BE ACC::Z. FTTD Ef'L"O CZT'Yo
hiA.[NT~ 5'TKE-rF 5YS"Z"EM
Yl/fl tf/t/ll/
I
I
,aNtNO
VICINITy MAP
NO ~C4LE
ITEM 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and
Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22715-F. (Northwest corner of Rancho
Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road).
PREPARED BY://v-~ Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer
~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council, AUTHORIZE the release of' Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor
and Material bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision
Monumentation bond in Tract No. 22715-F, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and the Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On September 12, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by
American Home Assurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. PB 30011345in the amount of $432,000to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. PB 30011345in the amount of $83,500to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 30011345in the amount of $34,500to cover sewer improvements.
e
Bond No. PB 30011345 in the amount of $275,000 to cover material and labor for
street, water, and sewer improvements.
5. Bond No. PB 30011346 in the amount of $15,000 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
R:~agdrpt\95\1128\tr22715f. rel
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture
partnership. The name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership
(comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor
Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the
partnership and riders to the Bonds have been submitted for City Council acceptance.
On April 26, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year
warranty period, and authorized the reduction in faithful performance bond to the following
warranty amount:
Streets/Drainage, Water and Sewer:
Bond No. PB 300 11 345 $ 55,000
Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have
been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommends that the
Faithful Performance warranty bond be released.
The developer is also required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to
suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined
by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement or statute after the City Council has accepted the
public improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been
filed with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond
be released:
Bond No, PB300 I 1 345 in the amount of $275,000.
The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been
completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of
the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows:
Bond No. PB300 11 346 in the amount of $15,000.
The affected streets are portions of Corte Las Cruces, Corte Santa Catalina, Butterfield Stage
Road, and Rancho Vista Road. These streets will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street
System by Resolution No. 95- . Butterfield Stage Road in this area was previously accepted
into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution No. 95-29.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachment:
Location Map
R:~agdrpt\95\i128\tr22715f. r~l
PROJECT
TRACT NO. 22715-F
Location .Map
i'I'EM 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
GITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and
Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22716-1. (Southwesterly of intersection
of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway)
PREPARED BY: ~, Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer
~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and
Material bonds for Street, Water, and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision
Monumentation Bond, in Tract No. 22716-1, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and the Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On July 25, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Tayco (Joint Venture of .Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
for the improvement of streets and storm drains, installation of sewer and water systems, and
subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds
issued by American Home Assurance- Company as follows:
Bond No. PB300 11 137 in the amount of $1,769,500to cover street and storm drain
improvements.
2. Bond No. PB300 11 137 in the amount of $105,000 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB300 11 137 in the amount of $188,486 to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. PB300 11 137 in the amount of $1,032,250to cover material and labor for
street, water, and sewer improvements.
agdtpt\95\l128~Tr227161.rel
5. Bond No. PB300 11 138 in the amount of $16,000 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Effective December 31, 1993, Cosrain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture
partnership. The name of the new partnership is TAYCO, a California General Partnership
(comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor
Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the
partnership and riders to the bonds, changing the obligee from the County to the City, the
Principal from Tayco to TAYCO, and reducing the Faithful Performance bond amounts, have
been submitted for City Council acceptance.
On July 12, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year
warranty period, and authorized the reduction in faithful performance bond to the following
warranty amount:
Streets, and Water and Sewer
Bond PB300 11 137
$206,999
Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have been
satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommendsthat the Faithful
Performance warranty bond be released.
The developer is also required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement or statute after the City has accepted the public
improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed
with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond be
released:
Bond No. PB300 11 137 in the amount of $1,032,250.
The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been
completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of
the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows:
Bond No. PB300 I 1 138 in the amount of $16,000.
The affected streets are Corte Higuera, Via Toreno, Vintage Hills Drive, and a portion of
Meadows Parkway, Rancho Vista Road, Camino Marea, and Rancho California Road. These
streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution No. 94-82.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None by this action.
These streets have previously been integrated into the City's Pavement Management System
and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement
condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for
5 to 8 years.
Attachment:
Location Map
R:~t~drpt~95\1128\Tr227161 .~1
Project Site "
-.-.: ..~.
VICINITY MAP
TRACT NO.
22716-1
Location Map
i'I'EM 15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and
FINANCE DIRECF~
CITY MANAGE
Materials, and
Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22716-3. (Northwesterly of intersection
of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road).
PREPARED BY://,'f Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer
~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and
Labor and Material bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the
Subdivision Monumentation Bond, in Tract No 22716-3, and DIRECT the City Clerk to
so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and the Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On October 24, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by
American. Home Assurance Company as follows:
Bond No. PB 30011382in the amount of $193,000to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. PB 30011382in the amount of $50,000to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 30011382in the amount of $50,000to cover sewer improvements.
,
Bond No. PB 30011382 in the amount of $146,000to cover material and labor for
street, water, and sewer improvements.
5. Bond No. PB 30011383 in the amount of $13,700 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
R:~agdrpt\95\1128~,tr227163 .RE[,
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture
partnership. The name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership
(comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor
Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the
partnership and riders to the Bonds have been submitted for City Council acceptance.
On April 26, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year
warranty period, and authorized reduction in faithful performance bond to the following
warranty amount:
Streets/Drainage, Water and Sewer:
Bond No. PB 30011382 $ 29,300
Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have
been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommends that the
Faithful Performance warranty bond be released.
The developer was required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute
or contractual condition after the City Council has accepted the public improvements.
The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed with the City.
Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond be released:
Bond No. PB300 11 382 in the amount of $146,000.
The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been
completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of
the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows:
Bond No. PB300 11 383 in the amount of $13,700.
The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council
Resolution No. 95- at this time. The streets within the subdivision are Corte Soledad, Corte
Amalia, and Via Asturiaso
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachment:
Location Map
R:XagdrptX95\1128Xtr227163 .REL
81
aAMCMO VISTA
..aajl' "
PROJECT SITE
TRAGT NO, 2Z716-3
VICINITY MAP
TRACT NO. 22716- 5
Location Map
ITEM 16
TO,'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tract No. 22716-3). (Northeasterly of intersection of Meadows
Parkway at Rancho Vista Road)
PREPARED BY://~'Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer
/~'Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95---
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN
STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET
(WITHIN TRACT NO. 22716-3)
CITY OF
PUBLIC
SYSTEM
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 22716-3 on October 26, 1989,
and entered into subdivision agreements for the improvement of streets and drainage, sewer
and water systems, and survey monumentation with:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Cosrain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
NeWport Beach, CA 92660
The developer has improved, to City standards, the public improvements in accord with the
subdivision agreements. The City Council previously accepted the public improvements, and
initiated the warranty period. Staff recommended action by the City Council on November 28,
1995, will authorize the release of the Faithful Performance warranty bond, and the Labor and
Material and the Survey monumentation Bonds. The Public Works Department recommends
release of the Faithful Performance Improvement Warranty securities as all required
maintenance and repairs have been satisfactorily completed. No claims against the Labor and
Material Bonds have been filed and the survey monumentation has been reviewed and
approved by Staff.
r:~egdrpt\95\l 128\tr227163.sts
Under provisions of the Streets and HiOhways Code (Section 1806), public streets offered by
the subdivider must be accepted by City Council resolution in order to be included in the
public-street maintained system.
The streets so affected are Corte Soledad, Corte Amalia, and Via Asturias.
Inasmuch as certain state funds are earmarked for maintenance of these publicly
-maintained streets, the process will make these streets eligible for those funds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These streets will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive
periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these
streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 7 to 10 years.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
r:~agdrpt\95\ 1128\tr227163 .sts
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,' ACCEFrING CERTAIN
PUBLIC STREETS INTO THECITY-MAINTAINED STREET
SYSTEM (WIT!tIN TRACT NO. 22716-3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_L'XILA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc. )
(Now Tayco, a California General Partnership comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California
Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation),
offered for dedication to the County of Riverside certain streets within Tract No. 22716-3, for
public street and public utility purposes, and said County of Riverside accepted said offers of
dedication by Board of Supervisors action on October 26, 1989.
WIIEREAS, The City of Temecula-became successors-in-interest to the County of
Riverside upon incorporation, effective December 1, 1989.
WltEREAS, Tayeo (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes,
Inc.)(Now Tayco, a California General Partnership comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes
California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California
Corporation) has improved to City standards, public improvements within the several streets
offered for dedication within Tract No. 22716-3, the legal descriptions of which are set forth
in Exhibit "A" and are depicted in Exhibit "B" .
' WHEREAS, the City desires to accept into the City-maintained street system the public
improvements within all or portions of the public streets offered to and accepted by the County
of Riverside as depicted in Exhibit "B" ;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City-maintained street system
those streets or portions of public streets offered to and accep~ by the County of Riverside
described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the
streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside, into the City-
maintained street system as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 281h day of November, 1995.
r:\agd rpfi95X 1128Xtr227163 .sts
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 281h day of November, 1995, by the
following vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCKIIZEMBERS:
ABSENT: -
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: -
COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt\95\ 1128\tr227163 .sts
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLIYTION NO. 95-
Accepting the public streets offered to and
accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated
on Tracts No. 22716-3, and accepting subject
public streets into the City Maintained-Street
System as described below:
Those lots described as Lots nan through "C" inclusive,
as shown on Tract No. 22716-3, f'ded 26 October 1989, in
Book 208 of Maps, Pgs 82-86. further described as follows:
(lOt "A")
(Lot "B")
(Lot "C")
Via Asturias
Corte Soledad
Corte Amalia
r:\agdrpt\95\1128~tr227163 .sts
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED
STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
T
STRF_L:'TS OR PORTZONS OF
TO BE ACCF-I~t'P--D INTO C~"Y-
MAINTAIHF_D STREET SYSTEM
F////////////////j
· ~'/,fz'4 ,eo4~
NO SCALE
ITEM 17
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Final Tract Map No. 24131-3 (located westerly of Meadows Parkway,
between McCabe Drive and Leena Way)
PREPARED BY:~ Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMEN DATI ON:
That the City Council approve Final Tract Map No. 24131-3 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Vesting Tract No. 241 31 Amendment No. I was approved by the Riverside County
Board of Supervisors on May 23, 1989. Tentative Tract No. 24131 was granted an extension
of time by the "Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding between the
City of Temucula, Bedford Development Company, and Mesa Homes (Park Fees)" recorded
February 18, 1993. The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval.
Final Tract No. 24131-3 contains 92 residential lots within 18.95 gross acres. The tract is
located westerly of Meadows Parkway, between McCabe Drive and Leena Way. This tract
is part of the Meadows Specific Plan (County approved SP219) and County of Riverside
Development Agreement No. 4. The applicant is Kemper Real Estate Development Company
(KRDC), Inc.
The following fees have been paid for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-3:
Stephen's K-Rat Fee (paid for entire Tentative Map)
$205,530.00
The following fees have been deferred for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-3:
Public Facilities Fee
Signal Mitigation Fee (bond on file)
Fire Mitigation Fee (bond on file)
Due prior to Building Permit
Due prior to Building Permit
Due prior to Building Permit
- 1 - r:\agdrpt~95\1128\24131-3 .map
The parkland dedication requirement (Quimby) has been satisfied pursuant to the Amendment
of "Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of
Temecula, KRDC, Inc. (formerly Bedford Development Company) and Mesa Homes (Park
Fees)", which was approved by City Council on December 8, 1992. Among other things, this
Development Agreement provides for the granting of several improved parks to the City.
The following bonds have been posted for Final Tract Map No. 24131-3:
Faithful Labor &
Performance Material
Subdivision
Monument
Street and Drainage
Water
Sewer
Survey Monuments
$389,000 $194,500
$132,000 $66,000
$128,500 $64,250
In addition, the following bonds have been posted
improvements for Final Tract Map No. 24131-3:
$22,000
for the associated infrastructure
Faithful Labor &
Performance Material
Street and Drainage $401,500 $200,750
Water $142,000 $71 ~000
Sewer $52,500 $26,250
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.-
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Location Map
Copy of Sheet 2 of Tract Map 24131-3
Fees and Securities Report
-2- r:\agdrpt\95\1128\24131-3 .map
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
Final Tract Mao No,. 24131-3
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project,
Feq
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby Fees)
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Public Facility
Fire Mitigation
Flood Control (ADP)
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 26(b)
See Staff Report
See Road Department
Letter dated 4-14-89
Pursuant to Development Agreement No, 4
See Fire Department
Letter dated 2-27-89
Exempt per RCFC&WCD letter dated 9-17-93
-3- r:\agdrpt\95~ 1128\24131-3 .map
,4
'i
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 24131-3 DATE: November 28, 1995
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY SECURITY
Street and Drainage * $ 790,500 $ 395,250
Water * $ 274,000 $ 137,000
Sewer * $ 181,000 $ 90,500
TOTAL $ 1,245,500 $ 622,750
this bond amount includes the associated infrastructure improvements for Final Tract Map
No. 24131-3 (see page 2 of Staff Report for breakdown of improvements)
Monument Security $22,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs N/A
RCFCD Drainage Fee (out of fee area per letter from RCFC&WCD) N/A
Fire Mitigation Fee (Agreement &Bond on file) $ T.B.D.**
Signal Mitigation Fee (Agreement &Bond On file) $ T.BoD. * *
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee N/A
Other Development Fees $ T.B.D * *
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee ·
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Letter of Map Revision (LOMR Review)
Fees Paid to Date (City)
Balance of Fees Due
N/A
$ 1,100.00
N/A
$ 1,100.00
$ 0.00
* * T.B.D. - To be determined
* * * fees paid to County of Riverside prior to City incorporation
- -4- r:\agdrpt~95~1128~24131-3 .map
ITEM 18
APPROVAL [~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC v
CITY MANAGE
i.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Exchange of Real Property between the City of Temecula and the New
Community Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod
PREPARED BY: (~Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council DIRECT the City Attorney to review the escrow instructions and when
satsifactory, the Mayor to sign the Grant Deed to convey the City property to the New
Community Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod.
BACKGROUND:
On June 8, 1993, the City Council approved the "Settlement of Claim and Release between
the City of Temecula and New Community Lutheran Church and the Pacific Southwest District
- Lutheran Church Missouri Synod (CHURCH)." As part of the settlement, the City property,
located on the north side of Pauba Road between La Primavera Street and Showalter Road,
will be exchanged for the CHURCH property, located at the southeast corner of Santiago Road
and Ynez Road. The CHURCH has entered into an escrow with Spring Mountain Escrow
Corporation through which the land transfer will occur.
On November 17, 1995, the New Community Lutheran Church provided the escrow
instructions to 'Staff and requested that this item be placed on the City Council Agenda for
your consideration at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
none.
Attachments:
1. Escrow Instructions dated August 1, 1994.
2. Settlement Agreement between the City of Temecula and the New Community
Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod dated July 13, 1993.
r:~agdrpt\gS\1128\parkview.doc
2.
3.
4.
7.
8.
12,
13.
14.
18,
17,
19.
20.
21.
22.
24,
25.
26.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34,
35.
36.
37,
38,
39.
40.
41.
42°
43.
~ 44,
4,5.
48.
47.
48.
49
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55,
56.
57,
58.
59.
60,
61.
62,
63,
64.
68.
70.
T SSI I{ING
MOUNTAIN
ESCRO¼z
Escrow
Date
54J5-SK
Aug. 1,
Page I
EXCIIANGE ESCROW INSTRUCTION:; 's't):
Spring Mountain Escrow Corp.
Temecula Branch
41530 Enterprise Cir. So. ~120
Temecula, CA 92590
Telephone: (909) 6?6-305o
Fax: (909)676-2713
Escrow Officer:
MEMO BOX/VALUATION TAB[,E:
I'ROPF. R'rY "A" I'ROPERTY "B"
EXCHANGE EQUITY $5m),000.O0 S500,000.00
TOTAL CONSIDERATION S5[)0,000.00
$500,000.00'
For the purpose of effect. ing an exchange of equities of tile real properties herei,lafter
described, the parties hereto agree to exchange their respective properties for and in
consideration of tile mutual covenants and agreements ]|ereinafter contained and upon the
terms and conditions set forth ill this agreement.
h ~ew--C-o-~,.~,'l,.I L,~j~I-k{re~,< C.(~orcl,- Old/./.
The Parties hereto being Lutheran Church Extension Fund - Hissouri Synod, hereinafter
referred to as "FIRST PARTY" and City of Temecula Isereinafter referred to as "SECOND
PARTY ".
The property which FIRST PARTY is to convey and which SECOND PARTY is to acquire in titis
?exchahge is hereinafter referred to as PROPERTY "A" and is described as follows:
PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY'PARCEl, MAP 14078 ON FILE IN BOOK 80 ['AGES 66 AND 67 OF PAR, .PS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNT. y oF RIVERSIDE, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALI[ a.
CO~EY~CE OF TITLE: 'FIle Deed to FIRS']' PROPERTY ks to be made to:
CITY OF TEMECULA, A CAI,IF'~ItF~I A nIJNJC] PAl, ('OI{POR~TION
The property which SECOND PARTY is [o convey and which FIRST PARTY?is'
exciiange is i,ereinaiter telerred to as PROPERTY "B" and is described as follows:
THaT PORTION bF THE RANCHO TEHECULA, IN TIlE CITY OF TEHECULA OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS GRANTEl) BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN TO
LgI8 VIGNE8 BY PATENT DATED J~NUARY 18, 1860, AND AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOM ] PAGE
3~ OF PATENTS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO qOUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING SOUTHERLY OF RANCHO VISTA
ROAD, NORTHERLY OF PAUBA ROAD, WE~'I'ERLY OF HARGARITA ROAD AND EASTERLY OF TIIAT CERTAIN
,PARCEL CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDEU DECEHBER 13, 1967, AS IN~TRUHENT NO, 109720 OF OFFICIAL
RECORD8 OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA;
EXCEPTIN~ THEREFROM TUAT PORTION Tt{ERI~F CONVEYED TO TIlE RANClIO CALIFORNIA WATER
DISTRICT;
A~80 EXCEPTING THEREFROM 'I'I{AT PORTION TIIEREOF CONVEYED TO 'File COUNTY OF ~IVERSI{H~
~BHALF OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA NU. 143 BY I)OCIJHENT RECORi]ED AUGUST 5, 1988, ~S [NS'r~UHE~7
NO. 231290 OF OFFICIAL RF;{:I~RD~ O[.' RIVE{{~;IUE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA;
A580 EXCEPTING TI{EREFRnH ']',I,VI' I'ORTION TiIEREOF CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF
DOCUMENT RECORDE{) SI:{'I'E~IIIEI{ 9, 19HS, AS ]N~ITRUHENT NO. 260424 OF OFFICIAL RECORD:: ~F
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALiFORN] A.
** Property'"B" is subject to lili~g ol' a subdivision.map duFing escrow by the Ci'
of Temecula in wl~icb a parcel containing no less than 7.72 buildable acres shall
established and shall be referred to wi~llin ~hese instructions as Proper~y
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
10.
11.
12.
13.
15.
16.
17.
18.
i9.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
33.
34.
35.
i3 SPRI'NG
MOUNTAIN
ESCROW
Escrow No.
Date
5415-SK
Aug. ],
['age 2
I q q -1
CON~/EYANCE OF TITLE: The Deed to SECOND PROI'EIUI'Y i:; to be made to:
LUTHERAN CHURCII EXTENSION FUND - MISSOURI SYNOD, A MISSOURI NOT FOR PROFIT
· be properties described above are to be conveyed subject only to time following:
1. 2rid Half Current General and Spec~aJ Taxes (or LIme fiscal year 1994/95.
'Is. A lien o~ supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to LIme provisions ol L'hapte
498, 1983 Statutes of the State nf CaJ. i[ornja.
Z. Assessments and bonds, n,mt del]nqueut, having all unpaid balance o~ NONE
3. Easements, Rights ot Way, Covenallts, Conditions, Rest. fictions & Reservations
Eecord. or in deed to record.
YoQ are to record any instrmunelmt called for in this escrow when you can obtain a I'olicy
of:Title I~surance {r,,m Fi,~;i A,,,+rkcau Title ]nsmmral~ce on each subject properly,
CoBraining the printed excelH. iomms usual in such policy with a liability oE S500,000.00.
Escrow holder is to prepare a "Preliminary Chum,fie of Ownership Report" o]1 each property,
iB accordance with time instructions contained herein, and is to deliver same to each
grantee ~or execution. Escrow ho].der is authorized amid instructed to charge each part)'
.825.00 ~or preparation of same. At time close uf escrow, escrow bolder shall deliver
said reports to tire Cornmary Recorder, a)on9 with time Grant Deed conveying title to same.
2This escrow is contingent upon each party's own investigation that the property LIme}' are
.acqUiring by means of exchange through this escrow is geologically sound and free
'~oxic wastes and suitable ~or coustrucLion. Deposit of closing funds by each party
:8)all 'be deemed removal o~ this contingency.
· ..~' :i '
'T~is escrow is contingent upon First I'arLy (Church) obtaining approval of its Pub)-ic Use
;Permit (P.U.P) for the cousLruction of a t'huFch.
36. The First Party and LiNe Second l'arty :;hall each hear one hale (1/2) of tile costs amid
37. .fees incurred in connection with timis escrow, inchreclinE, but not limited to, time
3/]. ;following: escrow fee, C[,TA policy o[' t. itLe jmm:;mlrammce, document. ary transfer tax ]n the
39. ,iamount of S505.00 on each tramms[er of property, and drawing and recording of documexmts.
40. Each party shall bear its o~-n legal lees.
41.
42. PRORATE AND/OR ADJUST THE POM,OWING ON BOTH I'ROPERTIES AS OF THE CLOSE OF ESCROW:
43.
44. 1. Taxes sINai] be prorated lot oath ,}t' Li~e I,am'cels herejn based on LIme amount ,,f the
45. last tax statement o~ the Tax ColJector. AIm taxes which are payable prior to the close
46. . Of escrow shall be paid by Grantor ot such parcel and shall be l, rorated accordingly.
47. . .
48.: ':~ ~A {~ER OF ~CORD ONLY WIT]I WI!ICI{ ESCI~()H IIOLDHR IS NOT TO DE CONCERNED, LIABLE
49. ~/OR RESPONSIBLE. TIlE PARTIES }IERETO HAVE ENTERED INTO CURTAIN AGREEHUNTS HIIICI{ ARE
50. OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF T!IBSE INSTRUCTION}I, BUT HIIICI{ TIIEY WISH STATgD HEREIN FOR 'rl{g
51. UCOU, AS FOLLOWS:
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
85.
67.
68.
69,
70.
'The parties have executed an agreement known as "Settlement of Claim and Release between
tile City of Temecula amid New Commmlnity Lutheram~ Cllurcim amid TIme Pacific Southwes~
District - Lutheran Chtmrch Hissouri Synod." These instructions are not intended to
· cancel, supersede or modiJy limp l,H'ms c+[ said agreement, insofar as said agreerecruit
relates to matters not actually I,-rtinelmt to time escrow instructions, such as, but not
limited to, the release o{ 1cOal claim.,~;, time grading of property, utilities and street
improvements.
EN)) OF MEMORANDUM
NOTICE: TiNis escrow shall a. de(:.me,) ol,en Nipoil time {late ILlme escrow hohler is imm receipt
of executed escrow imm!;rru,:l i,,mms from huyer alld seller. [Jlltil execnted escrow
instructions from buyer and :;elleN' are re,':eived, the I>am'ties acknowledge timat
holder, is merely a depositom-y ageilL and that all documents aud/or funds will be returned
tO the parties upon a unilateral request by the party dellsiting same.
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7..
8.
10.
11.
'12.
1.3.
14.
~:5..
18. i
1T.:
1'~..
~'i'.
22.
} ".Z.-SPRING
MOUNTAIN
ESCRO\
Escrow No
Date
5415-SK
Aug. 1, 1991
Page 3
eXf ·
Time is of the essence i,l these jnstr.ctions. This escrow sitall close on or befoz'e
Janhary 30, 1995, and is contingent .port the :;.ccessful completion ot all transtecs
reterred to in this transactiou subject to the terms o[ this Exchange Agreement.
:~[~}tes agree that regardless of date instruct:ions are delivered into escrow, upon
'.~C~ipt Of same the closing date shall ['email~ as set out on page ] of these
' ~ructions.
~p~p such opening date, parties are aware and a<jree this escrow shall not be cancelled
a~d:i.~o funds will be released u.ti] such time as escro~ agent has received executed
~:~:]f~:cellatton instructions ~rom all parties.
':~'~a~l~le no notice, demand, or change of instructions shall be of any effect unless
". ~; , . . . . . ·
?l~ ~ltt~9 alid approved In writing by a]I pal ties affected by same.
~ "'~e~in9 of escrow" is tile date escrow holder receives executed instructions trom
g; principals. In the absence of receipt of execnted instructions from all parties and
~{}q;~e sole discretion of escrow holder, escrow hohler is instructed to return all
j ~'~e~tn~twe~ty (20) days from tile date of deposit including monies to the appropriate
~{ies. On real estate transactions, the "close of escrow" is defined as the date
o{uments'are recorded with the to,sty recorder. For other types of transactions,
2S' ~cl~se o~escro~" is defined as the date on which all co.ditions and contingencies have
24. "b~'F met a~d satisfied. I~ the dose of egc'rt}w has not occttrred at tile time ~
2~ ' ':' 0 ' · . . . · ...... ' pro ·
gthese Instructions escrow holde~ I~ :'::~i; .~
..':.%posSible ~less escrow hohler receives nuthal written instructlolls cancelling tile
.'~s~ro~. All prorations are based on a thirty (30) day month and are made as of the {late
.. ;'., .. . . , ,
.;..:. · ..: · .. , : . · ....
-.,.' {' ~i~elpalS. The principals acknowledge escrow hohler has not made any represents
-.,:< {;{~din9 {~is transaction or the property; has not provided any legal or tax adv
· ,,g.~, i~' oilered any interpretations or positions on le~al or tax matters.
~:~.,.- .. '~ · ' : r; q · 'he sufficiency, validity, and/or
· ~ ~row holder is authorized tn nti lize the services or a sub-escrow agent as a
-".~.t~mittal or check [rom funds on del,u~;it for the party requesting the service. In
~' ~:Or~er to transmit funds by Federal Wire, esero~ hohler is hlstructed to disburse ~unds
48. Vtojt~pring Mountain Group "GPRING HOUNTAIN G~OUP WIRE TRANSFER ACCOUNT" with wiring
49. ~:instructions in order to facilitate the wire request. The principals acknowledge that
50. ~fu~ds deposited into the escrow file are held jn a lion- hirerest bearing escrow trust
51. lardoust'
52.
53. .All documents and checks will he forwarded via First Class Nail. If requested to use
54. , ~anotber delivery service. escrow holder is instructed to pay the charges assessed by
55..~;;esbrol holder from tile-~unds on deposit. gscruw holder is authorized to pay an escrow
56.: .~.~. '::i~e at its
~7. ~ and all charges f~om ~unds on deposit in ti~e escrow file. Should escrow holder
.' .~ ', sole d~scretion, that it is nece~;sary to incur extraordinary charges
59...,.
60. ::Escrow holder is authorized to accept ot'lgjzla,l counterpart escrow instr.ctions,
61. ~amendments and other documents. ~11 co,nterparts together shall constitute olle and tile'
62. '~same document. Escrow holder is jnstr.cted to make available copies o[ all documents to
63. '{the prlnclpal's real estate broker agent attorney or lender.
64. :; , ,
qS. '~if.:'requested by the escl'e, holder, Lhe I~rjncipals agree to uccept tile written
66. ::tre'iignation oI escro~ holde~ a,d to cancel the escrow. I~ instructions to ca.col th
67. · ' .
68. escrow are not received within {eft (10) days of request, then escro~ hohler may lesion
69.
70.
2.
3.
4.
5.
-~.
'8.
9.
10.
'12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29,
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50,
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
i SPRING
MOUNTAIN
ESCROW
Escrow No
Dine
5415-SK
Aug. 1.19qt
Page 4
and interplead the fnnds and rlor~mlments with a con[t of competent jurisdiction. If thp
escrow holder receives instx'mmctions to cancel tile file; if escrow holder resigns; or if
the file cancels in any other manner, timel} the principals irrevocably authorize escrow
holder to deduct a cancellation lee from time fnnds on deposit and to disbt, rse any
remai~ing funds pursuant to time i,tstructions of the principals.
In addition to any other le~s and costs, the principals johatly and severally
that, i{ escrow holder is required to hold tnnds on deposit for more than 90 days
the e~tlmated closinq date, or a~ter {=lie date [nnds and documents are d~posi[ed
whi~h$ver'i~ later, whether or not time escrow tile has closed or cancelled, then escrow
holder Is irrevocably authorized to deduct and pay to escrow {molder on the first of each
s~sequent month, a "hold open" fee of S75.00 per month from funds on deposit in time
escrow. The principals irrevocably instruct escro~ holder to cancel and close the escro~
file when all funds on deposit have been disbursed.
The principals to this escrow, jointly and s~ve['ally, promise to indemnify and
e{~ro~ holder harmless from a]I tees, exl~enses, obligations and liabilities which escrow
holder may incur or suf{er directly or hxdirectly. either before or after tile clo~{e
~aa~ellation o{ the escrow file. The principals to the escrow, jointly and severally.
praise to pay on demand all fees and costs jncurred or suffered by escrow holder
dl[ectly or indirectly, either before ox' atter the close or cancellation ol the escrow
file including, but not limj r. ed to, admjnistrative amid governmental costs, damages,
a~ards, jud~ements, audit and le~a] fees, litigation costs, arbitration charges,
in~ludinq, but not ljmited to attorney's fees and costs before trial, at trial, on
appeal or for collection. Escrow holder does not agree to submit to arbitration or any
other alternative dispute resolution method.
8prinQ ~ou~tain Escrow Corporation has b~em{ issued an escrow aqent's license by r.h~
Cali{ornia Department of Corporations.
L~AN CHURCH BXT~SION FUND - MISSOURI SYNOD,
A MISSOURI NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION
BY;
City of Temecula
BY:
SECOND PARTY SIGNATURES
CITY OF TEHECULA, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
BY:
SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM AND RELEASE
BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
NEW COMMUNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH AND
THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST DISTRICT -
LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD
[LUTHERAN CHURCH EXTENSION FUND]
This Settlement and Claim and Release Agreement
("Agreement") is by and between the City of Temecula ("City") and
New Community Lutheran Church ("Church") and the Lutheran Church
Extension Fund - Missouri Synod ("LCEF") and shall become
effective only when executed by all parties hereto and when
formally approved by the City Council at a duly noticed meeting
of the Council.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The real property (Lot 86") which is subject matter of
this Agreement is property located in Riverside County in the
City of Temecula at the southeast corner of Santiago and Ynez
Road ("Church Land"). The title holder to Lot 86 is LCEF. LCEF
and Church have an agreement to enable Church to purchase the
land from LCEF to enable Church to erect worship facilities
thereon.
During 1992, Church applied to City for a public use
permit ("PUP") to erect certain worship facilities on Lot 86.
On September 21, 1992, the City of Temecula Planning
Commission ("Commission") considered the Church's PUP Lot 86 and
denied the same.
Thereafter, the Church appealed the decision of the
Commission to the City Council ("City Council") of the City of
Temecula.
On November 19, 1992, the City Council denied the Church's
appeal.
The Church believes that both the denial of their PUP
application for Lot 86 and the manner in which their PUP
application was denied by the Commission and Council violated
their constitutional and other legal rights and that the Church
has suffered monetary damage as a result of those violations.
The City disputes these allegations.
The City and the Church have met in an attempt to
resolve the dispute between themselves and have agreed upon a
land exchange (the "Exchange") as a compromised settlement of all
claims which is memorialized by this Agreement.
58388.2 - 1 - "
1. LOCATION OF LAND TO BE EXCHANGED.
Church Land: Land, free of encumbrances, located at
the southeast corner of Santiago and Ynez Road which
City is receiving from Church in this Land Exchange
("Church Land"). More particularly described in
Exhibit A hereto.)
City Land: Buildable land, free of encumbrances,
acceptable to Church, located south and adjacent to
PaUba Road and west of the existing City of Temecula
Sports Park which Church is receiving from City in this
land Exchange (City Land"). (More particularly
described in Exhibit B hereto.)
2. ESCROW OF LAND TO BE EXCHANGED.
As soon as reasonably possible, the parties will open
an escrow (the "Escrow") at Rosewood Escrow, providing that the
parties will exchange the City Land for the Church Land. The
Church will receive comparable buildable City Land from the City
in an amount not less than Church's current buildable Church
Land, i.e., 7.72 acres. The City Land shall include the
surrounding slopes. The instructions for said escrow shall
contain provisions which reasonably require the parties to obtain
title insurance (each party at its own cost), pro-rate property
taxes (if any) as of date of close of escrow, and to assure
themselves that the property exchanged is geologically sound and
free of toxic wastes and suitable for construction. The Escrow
shall close upon the earlier of: (a) the Church's receipt of
approval of its P.U.P. application (and satisfaction of all other
preconditions of escrow); or (b) expiration of 180 days from
.opening of escrow unless extended by mutual agreement of the
parties, which agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld.
3. UTILITY CONNECTIONS.
Church agrees that it will bear all costs necessary to
bring all utilities to the site of the City Land being exchanged
with the Church at no cost to the City.
4. STREET IMPROVEMENTS.
Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any
building on the City Land, Church shall design, widen and
construct Pauba Road to four lanes, plus curb, gutter and
sidewalk on the north-side of the street, from Primavera Road
west to'the City Land. The Church shall pay all.engineering,
design, grading, permit, and construction costs, provided that
the City, at its cost, shall rough grade Pauba Road concurrently
with rough grading the City Land. As a condition to the closing
of the EscrOW, Church shall provide the City with City approved
rough grading plans for Pauba Road prior to the close of the
Escrow.
5. COSTS & FEES INCURRED IN EXCHANGE.
City and Church shall each bear one-half (1/2) of the
Escrow costs and fees incurred in connection with the Exchange.
Each party shall bear its own legal fees.
6. ZONE CHANGE AND PUBLIC USE PERMIT.
Prior to and as a condition of the close of Escrow, the
Church shall obtain necessary Land use entitlement for the City
Land, for construction of a Church on the City Land. Church
shall be free at any time to apply for a zoning classification
which will allow uses other than or in addition to a church use.
The City is under no obligation to approve any land use
applications, and the Church is not obligated to authorize the
closing of Escrow until it receives land use entitlement
satisfactory to the Church. City staff shall make its best
efforts to process Church's P.U.P. application in an expedient
manner. Church believes and City has represented that the only
land use entitlement necessary for construction of Church's
planned church buildings shall be a P.U.P. Church, shall have
the option to cancel escrow if it is determined that land use
entitlements other than a P.U.P. shall be required. If the
Church does not receive satisfactory land use entitlements within
180 days of the opening of Escrow, the Escrow and this Agreement
shall terminate unless the parties agree to extend the escrow
beyond 180 days which agreement shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
7. GRADING OF CiTY LAND FOR CHURCH USE.
Prior to the close of escrow, City shall prepare a plan
to rough grade the City Land into a 7.72 buildable site. City
agrees that within one hundred and eighty (180) days after
closing of the escrow, approval of land use entitlement for
worship facilities on the City Land in a form acceptable to the
Church, and delivery of approved grading plans for Pauba Road,
whichever occurs last, City shall complete rough grade and
compact the City Land in accordance with the Building Code of the
City of Temecula. City agrees that it shall bear all said costs
of rough grading and related compaction (if any) of the City Land
incurred in yielding a buildable pad of not less than 7.72 acres.
Church should bear the responsibility of its own cost, for
preparing site for construction and site preparation beyond the
rough grading stage.
5a388. z - 3 -
8. ExtensiOn of Tentative Tract MaD No. .
As a condition of the close of escrow, Church shall
apply for and obtain an extension of Tentative Tract Map No.
for the Church land.
CHURCH'S RELEASE OF PENDING/IMMINENT LEGAL CLAIMS
CONDITIONED.
Conditioned upon the closing of Escrow and the approval
of Land Use entitlement for the Church's worship facilities on
the City Land, Church agrees as follows:
D e
Church and LCEF and their owners, partners, officers,
agents, employees, members, assigns and successors-in-
interest, release City from any and all rights, claims,
demands, and damages of any kind, known or unknown~ asserted
or unasserted, existing or arising on or before the date of
execution of this Agreement and resulting from or related to
the conditions or the allegations of the tort claim which
the Church and LCEF filed with the City on or about February
9, 1993, which is attached as Exhibit D hereto. Church and
LCEF understand and agree that all of their rights under
Section 1542 of the Civil Code of California or any similar
law of any state or territory-of the United States are
hereby expressly waived. Said section reads as follows:
"Section 1542. General Release - Claims
Extinguished. A general release does not
extend to claims which the creditor does not
know or suspect to exist in his favor at the
time of executing the release, which, if
known by him, must have materially affected
his settlement with the debtor."
It is understood and agreed that this Agreement represents
settlement of disputed claims and is notto be construed as
representing an admission of liability on behalf of any
party to this Agreement. The parties, however, intend to
buy their peace and to forever provide a full and complete
release and discharge from any and all liability arising out
of the transactions, matters, and events more particularly
identified hereinabove.
Parties expressly warrant, represent and agree that in
executing this Agreement, they do so with full knowledge of
any rights which they have or may have with respect to this
Agreement and with respect to the hereinabove referenced
claim.
The parties acknowledge that after entering into this
Agreement, they may discover different or additional facts
concerning the subject matter of this Release or their
understanding of those facts. The parties therefore,
expressly assume the risk of such facts being so different
and agree that this Agreement shall, in all respects, be
effective and not subject to rescission, cancellation or
termination by reason of any such additional or different
facts.
ATTORNEY FEES/COSTS INCURRED IN REGARD TO ENFORCEMENT OF
THIS AGREEMENT.
Should any party thereto employ an attorney for the
purpose of enforcing or construing this Agreement, or any
judgment based on this Agreement in any legal proceeding
whatsoever, including; insolvency, bankruptcy, arbitration,
declaratory relief, or other litigation, including appeals or
rehearings, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive
from the other party reimbursement for all attorney's fees and
costs, including, but not limited to, service of process, filing
fees, court and court reporter costs, investigative costs, expert
witness fees, and the cost of any bond whether taxable or not.
Should any judgment or final order be issued in that proceeding,
such reimbursement shall be specified therein. The "prevailing
party" means that party determined by the court to most nearly
prevail, and not necessarily the one in whose favor a judgment is
granted.
11. CONSTRUCTION OF TERMS.
This Agreement and the terms thereof shall be
constructed and enforced in accordance with the Laws of the State
of California.
12. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS.
All the terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon,
and inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the parties
hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and
assignees.
13. EXECUTION OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
The parties hereto agree to execute such additional
documents as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate to
implement the terms and provisions of this Agreement.
14. COUNTERPARTS.
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of
which so executed shall be deemed an original; and such
counterparts shall together constitute but one Agreement.
58388.2 -- 5 --
IN 'WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their
hand the day and year set forth opposite each party respective
name.
CHURCH
DATED: 7- ~ , 1993 By:
DATED: 7 - % , 1993
~N~t Orgahiz~/ti~n
LCEF
By: 'f 7~ ~
Missouri Synod, a Non-Profit
Organization
CITY
DATED: ~°/$ , 1993 By:
GifrMaaY~~fthe
ATTEST"
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
F Z -6-
ITEM 19
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
r,.Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 1995
Award a C~ntract to Reconstruct Three (3) Desilting Ponds in the
Santiago Channel from Vallejo Avenue to John Warner Road
PREPARED BY: ~i~Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council award a contract for construction of three (3) desilting ponds in Santiago
Channel to Monteleone Excavating, the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of $11,550.00.
BACKGROUND:
In November, 1995 tlie Public Works Department in conformance with the City's current
purchasing procedures requested proposals for Public Works Project. Only one sealed bid was
received for the following scope of work:
Construct three (3) desilting ponds per detail "A" at the following locations (See Detail
"B").
The bid received is as follows:
Monteleone's Excavating, Murrieta
$11,550.00
Monteleone Excavating has performed contract work in the past for the City of Temecula, and
we have found their work to be satisfactory. The costs are within the Engineer's estimate.
The property owner, through the Right of Entry Agreement, allows the desilting ponds to be
constructed each fall with the understanding that each spring the property will be returned to
a natural state. The construction of the basins prevents large quantities of silt from entering
the Vallejo Channel and causing a significant maintenance problem. The installation and
removal of the desiltation ponds is more cost effective method of controlling downstream
problems.
r:~agdtpt\95~1128Ndamwl.bid/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Department Drainage Facilities account 100-164-601 -
5401 for the propostgd work at Santiago Channel. ·
Attachments:
1. Detail "A"
2. Detail"B"
3. Work Order//95-96-14
r:NagdrptX95X1128~hannel.bid/ajp
DE'~AIL 'Au
2' BELOW ELEVATION OF SANTIAGO ROAD
I
~ I' WIN. ,
, ~ -- ''._~,_""'_2- 'T"
'E COMPACTED
~"'- ~ "-.~,-~" ·',LACED o. '
A Ol~P,'rOR FAC; OF DAM OVi~l PLASTIC 6 COURSES HIGH (FIRST 2 COURSES TO BE BURIED)
SECTION' T~ROUGH EMBANKMENT
· NOT T--D SCALE
D~"['AIL BB
{:1 t/
SECTION D-D
NOT TO 5C-"LE
TYPICAL DESILTING DAM DETAIL
· ..'
...
~m
}
7.5
MINUTE
. '~87
,'L
CALIFORNIA -'
SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
I1 730 OO0 FEET
117°07'30"
33 °30'
- .:.::..~:,:
3706
~;-
DETAIL "B:'
DETENTION FACILITY
LOCATION
480 000
~ v~' 3704
'v"- -- /
VICINITY
MAP
City of Temecula
Public Works Department
WORK ORDER REQUEST
Street Maintenance
DATE: November 1, 1995
JOB ~95-96-14
BID OPENING DATE: November 8, 1995
Deliver to:. City Ha!l, 43174 Business Park Dr., City Clerks Office no later than 2:30 p.m.
LOCATION:
Santiago Road between John Wamer Road and Vallejo Avenue
(See Attached Vicinty Map)
SCOPE OF WORK INVOLVED:
Construct three (3) desilting ponds. per attached detail, Using existing material in channel
· Delete energy dissipator rip-rap
Reminder: AH projects require Certified Payroll
CONTRACTOR
PREPARED BY:
MONTELEONE EXC.
PLEASE PRINT
TOTAL PRICE:
CITY
APPROVED BY:
$ 11,550.00 ~,dJ._~.~f
elevn-thousand-five hundred and fifty/00
(written mount - Ple~ spell out)
r. ~n~ntX96workor%wkoglfn~ 14tajp
CITY OFTEMF_CULA
BID OPENING LOG SYIF~ET -
10.
CC:
City Clerk's Staff (3)
Initiating Department (1)
City Manager (1)
3
2'~forus~bids~-OlO
ITEM 20
APPROVAL~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
November 28, 1995
Community Services Funding Requests
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the ad hoc subcommittee's
recommendation for Community Services Funding requests by Temecula Valley National Little
League (TVNLL) in the amount of $2,500 and TEAM Community Pantry in the amount of
$5,000.
DISCUSSION: At the meeting of September 12, 1995the City Council approved funding
to 17 local organizations for Community Services Funding requests in the amount of $92,500.
After committee review by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans and Councilmember Birdsall the
recommendations were taken to council. Since then, two additional applications have been
received. At the November 14, 1995 City Council meeting the council reappointed the ad hoc
subcommittee. The committee is recommending that the organizations receive funding as
outlined below:
NAME
Temecula Valley
National Little League
PROGRAM
Baseball &
softball player
scholarships
AMT
AMT REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
$2,500 $2,500
TEAM Community Food to $10,000 $5,000
Pantry homeless and
needy persons.
The TVNLL is requesting funding to be used for players' registration fees of those who would
normally not be able to play due to financial reasons. The pantry is requesting funding to
assist their expenses incurred by utilities, food and shelter provided to the homeless or needy.
FISCAL IMPACT: The unencumbered balance in the City Council discretionary account
number 001-100-999-5267 is $7,500.
R:WORTONLLAGENDAS|CSFAPP2.AGN 11/02/95
ITEM 2 1
ORDINANCE NO. 95-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN
AMENDM'F~NT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE
DEVEIA3PMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AND BCFCCL VENTURE NO. 1
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and BCFCCL VENTURE NO. 2
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199,
PLANNING AREA 14, MARGARITA VILLAGE,
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0078.
WHEREAS, Section 65864 .el se~_. of the Government Code of the State of California
and Temecula City Resolution No. 91-52 authorize the execution of agreements establishing
and maintaining requirements applicable to the development of real property; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedure specified in said Resolution, BCI/CCL
VENTURE NO. 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and BCUCCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership, hereinafter "BCI/CCL" has filed with the
City of Temecula an application for a Development Agreement which reflects an amendment
and re-statement of existing County Development Agreement #5 (hereinafter "this
Agreement"), of a residential housing subdivision on its property for Planning Area 14
located at Tracts 23100-1 (8 lots), 23100-2 (15 lots), 23100-3 (28 lots), 23100-4 (23 lots),
23101-2 (28 lots) and 23101-3 (9 lots), hereinafter the "Subject Property" which application
has been reviewed and accepted for filing by the Community Development Director; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the City's intention to consider adoption of this Agreement
with BCI/CCL, has been duly given in the form and manner required by law, and the
Planning Commission and City Council of said City have each conducted public hearings on
October 16, 1995 (Planning Commission), and November 14, 1995 (City Council) at which
time it heard and considered all evidence relevant and material to said subject.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. FINDINGS. The City Council hereby finds and determines, with
respect to this Agreement by and between .the City of Temecula and BCI/CCL that it:
A. Is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land. uses, and programs
specified in the City of Temecula's General Plan in that this Agreement makes reasonable
provision for the use of certain real property for residential development consistent with the
Ords\95-13
General Plan's land use designation of low-medium density residential;
B. Is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for,
the land use district in which the Subject Property referred to therein is located as this
Agreement provides for residential development pursuant to a Specific Plan;
C. Is in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare, and good land
use practice because it makes reasonable provision for a balance of land uses compatible with
the 'remainder of the City;
D. Will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare because it
provides adequate assurances for the protection thereof;
E. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was published in
a newspaper of general circulation at least twenty (20) days before the Planning Commission
public hearing, and mailed or delivered at least twenty (20) days prior to the hearing to the
project applicant and to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police
protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600')of
the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll;
F. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission included the
date, time, and place of the public heating, the identity of the hearing body, a general
explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description in text or by diagram of the
location of the real property that is the subject of the hearing, and of the need to exhaust
administrative remedies;
G. Notice of the public hearing before the City Council was published in a
newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the City Council public
hearing, mailed at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to the project applicant, to each
agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and fire protection, and
to all property owners within six hundred feet (600') of the property as shown on the latest
equalized assessment roll;
H. Notice of the City Council heating included the date, the time, and place of
the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, the general explanation of the matter to
be considered, a general description in text or by diagram of the location of the real property
that is the subject of the heating, and the notice of the need to exhaust administrative
remedies;
I. City Council approved this Agreement by Ordinance based upon evidence and
findings of the Planning Commission and new evidence presented at its heating on this
Agreement, giving its reasons therefore and set forth their relationship between this
Agreement and the General Plan;
Ords\95-13 -2-
K. The benefits that will accrue to the people of the City of Temecula from this
legislation and this Agreement are as follows:
Generation of municipal revenue;
1. Construction of Public infrastructure facilities;
2. Acceleration of both the timely development of subject property as well
as the payment of municipal revenue;
3. Enhancement of quality of life for surrounding residents with the timely
development through the elimination of dust and nuisance of partially improved lots;
Payment of Public Facility, fire, library, and traffic signal mitigation
fees; and,
5. Early completion of the recreation facility required of the project.
Section 2. APPROVAL. This Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference as Attachment '1' is hereby approved. The Mayor is authorized and
directed to evidence such approval by executing this Agreement for, and in the name of, the
City of Temecula; and the City Clerk is directed to attest thereto; provided, however, that
this Agreement shall not be executed by the City until this Ordinance takes effect and the
City has received from the applicant two executed originals of said Agreement.
Section 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the
provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent
jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid,
such decision shah not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. NOTICE OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the
adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers
voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
' Ords~95-13 -3-
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 28 day of November,
1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATfEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City Of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 95-13 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of November, 1995, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 281h day of November, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
Ords\95-13
TEMECU.LA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DIST.RICT
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD NOVEMBER .14, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:42
PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
President Ron Roberrs presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Stone
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar
Items I and 2. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Stone absent and Director
Parks abstaining on Item 1.2.
Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 10, 1995.
1.2 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995.
Quitclaim of Easement Within Maraarita Community Park
2.1 Accept a quitclaim deed from Eastern Municipal Water District for an easement
on the Margarita Community Park Site, and authorize the City Clerk to record
the document with the Riverside County Recorder's Office.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
r:\minutes.csd\l 11495 -1-
City Council Minutes November 29. 1994
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
None given.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT
Director Birdsall stated she has received a brochure from the League of California Cities
regarding the Community Services Conference in Monterey which she will be attending and
encouraged the Community Services Commissioners to also attend.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 7:44 PM to
a meeting on November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Stone
absent.
Ronald H. Roberrs, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
District Secretary
r:~minutes.csd\l 11495 -2-
ITEM 2
APPRO L
CITY ATTORNERE~~
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: .
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
November 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Naming of a Newly Acquired Park Site
PREPARED BY: ~erman D. Parker, Deputy Director of Community Services
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Name the newly acquired park site "The Duck Pond".
BACKGROUND: As of July 31,1995, the City of Temecula acquired the property
referred to as the Duck Pond from Kemper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC). The
newly acquired 7.5 acre park site is located on the southeast corner of Rancho California Road
and Ynez Rd., providing the City a highly visible, centrally located park site. This park site will
greatly assist the Community Services Department in meeting the passive recreation needs of
the community.
At the October 17, 1995 meeting of the Board of Directors, staff presented the Commission's
recommendation to officially name the park site "The Duck Pond". However, in light of the
recent untimely passing of the City's first City Manager, David F. Dixon, it was the desire of
the Board of. Directors to recognize Mr. Dixon's contributions to our community by officially
naming this park site in his honor. This item was referred back to the Community Services
Commission for their consideration.
At the November 13, 1995 Community Services Commission meeting, staff presented the
Board of Directors recommendation, that the Commission approve naming the park site the
David F. Dixon Memorial Park. The Commission discussed this issue at great length. They
acknowledged the accomplishments and contributions of Mr. Dixon and support naming a city
facility or amenity in his honor. However, the Commission recommended that this particular
-park site be officially named "The Duck POnd", primarily because this site is a community
landmark that has been referred to as "The Duck Pond" for over twenty years.
A copy of Resolution No. CSD 92-08, a policy for naming parks and recreation facilities is
attached for your review. The Board may approve this name or select any other name desired.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT:
Naming Policy
KESOLUTION NO. CSD 92-08
A RESOLUTION OF TtIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF 77-IE TENEECULA CONEvILrNTTY SERVICES
DISTRICT ADOPTING A POLICY FOR NA2VFrNG
PAIIK,q AND RECREATION FACILITIES
W'lzFF~, on April 23, 1991, the Boazd of Directors (the "Board") adopted a policy
for naming parks and rec?,~t~on facilities; and
WKEiREAS, the Community Scrvic.~s District and the Parks and Recre. afion Commission
requests that the aforementioned policy be adopted by re~otufion;
NOW, TYFF~RKFORE, TYrK BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ TE~MZECTjLA
CONIi~KJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES tIEREBY, RESOLVE, DETERMINE .~ND
OtLDER AS FOT-T-OWS:
Section 1. That the policy for naming parks and recreation facilities as se~ forth on
Exhibit "A" is adopw. d establishing a uniform policy and proc~ure that identifies criteria for
the naming of parks and recreation facilities.
PASSFD, A2PROVED AND ADOFTED this 8th day of September, 1992.
Ronald J. Pazks, President
ATFr_ST:
Greek, City
R:~s CZD 92-08
STATE OF CA!-I~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEM2ECUI~ )
I, Iune S. Gf~k, City Clerk of ~hc City of Tem~cula, tzF~-~F]qY DO CERTIFY mat
foregoing R:~lu~on No. CSD 92-08 ~ duly ~dopt~ a~ ~ r:g~ m~g of ~e Ci~ Counc~
of ~e Ci? of Tem~ula on ~e g~ ~y of S~tember 1992 by ~e foHo~ng ro~ c~ yore.
A Y=~S: 5 DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Mu~oz
Parks,
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIXECTORS: None
june S. Greek, C~Clerk
Redo, CSD 92-08
EXhibit "A"
TE EECULA CONBIDi TTY SERVICES DISTR/CT
Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities
PD?JOSE
To es:ab!ish a uniform policy and procedure that identifies
criteria for the naming of parks and recreation facilities.
POLICY
The Park and Recreation Commission will be responsible for the
se!ec=ion of names for parks and recreation facilities. Once a
name is selected, it will be forwarded to ~_he Board of Directors
for ratification. Staff will be responsible for encouraging
citizens and community organizations to suggest possible names ~az
will then be forwarded to the Commission for consideration.
At a minimum, each park and community building will be designated
a name. Naming of specific areas within a park (g~rden, swimming
pool, lake, ballfield, etc.) is acceptable but should be kept to a
minimum to avoid confusion. No park shall .be given a name which
might be perceived as controversial by the community- All names
selected shall be acceutab!e and meaningful to a majority of the
neighborhood/community. where the park or recreation facility is
!oca=ed.
Priority in naming sites shall be given to geographical !ucations,
historic significance or geologic features. No park sha!!,'be.named'
for a person, except where an individual has made a significant'
financial contribution toward the acquisition and/or development of
the park or facility, or has been an outstanding long-time
community leader who has supported open space and recreational
activities.
All park and recreation facilities.will be designated a formal name
wilhin six months of ac~_--uisizion or construction. All parks shall
have an entrance sign. Buildings will have an entrance sign and a
p!acue inside the facility for name identification.
The name of a park or recreation facility may be changed only after
a hearing is held by ~he Commission to receive community inpu~ and
direction. No name shall be changed ~n!ess ~here is significan~
juszificalicn and support by the community.
RSPONSIBIL!TY
D am arman=
Parks and
Recreation
Commission
DeDarrm~en~
ACTION
Ac,.--uires a new park cr recreation
faci!iZy.
Solicits possible names from c~unizy.
Forwards suggested names Zo the Parks and
Recreation Commission for consideration.
Receives any additional community input.
Se!ec=s a name for'the new park cr
recreation facility.
ForWards name to 'CiIy Council fsr
ratification-
Installs the appropriate naming sign or
plaque.
DEPARTMENTAL
'REPORT
CITY ATTORNAEPyPROV.~~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT'
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
November 14, 1995
SUBJECT: Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: ',.-Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Phase I of Parkview Site Project (Fire Station) and Pauba Road improvements bid opending
was held on October 19, 1995. Staff anticipates the award of a construction contract at
the November 14, 1995 City Council meeting, with construction to begin in December,
1995.
Phase II of the Parkview Site Project provides for slope stabilization and re-vegetation
improvements within the creek at the Rancho California Sports Park. The funding for this
project includes ~100,000 from State Grants and $200,000 from Development Impact
Fees. The consultants are currently preparing recommendations for channel rehabilitation
and will begin the preparation of construction drawings. It is anticipated that this project
will be 'out to bid in December, 1995.
The final design for Margarita Community Park was approved by both the Community
Services Commission and the City Council. Staff anticipates presenting the Margarita
Community Park Master Plan to the Temecula Valley School District Board of Directors
before the end of the this month. Upon final approval by the Board of Directors, the
consultant will begin the construction drawings.
The Temecula Middle School Lighting Project is complete and the fields are currently being
used by the Temecula Valley Sports Leagues.
The Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project is currently under construction and
on schedule. Development of the 10 acre site will complete the improvements to the
northeast corner of the park at Rancho Vista and Margarita Roads. The improvements will
include parking, picnic facilities, a roller hockey rink, a skateboard facility,
restroom/concession building, landscaping and irrigation system.
A dedication ceremony for Nicolas Road Park and Voorburg Park was held on Thursday,
October 19, 1995. Nicolas Road Park is a three acre neighborhood park and Voorburg
Park is a ~luarter acre neighborhood park. The two parks are open to the public and have
been well received by the neighborhoods surrounding the parks.
Escrow for the new City Hall is scheduled to close on November 22, 1995. A Grant Deed
presentation ceremony has been planned for December 1, 1995, 2:00 P.M. - 4:00 P.M.
The consultant, Tsutsumida and Associates, and the design team are in final review of the
space plan design. Once the City Council has approved the final space plan, the
consultant will begin construction drawings for tenant improvements.
The design team for the City Maintenance Yard has met to review the employee input
forms for the facility. The architect is currently working on the design for the building and
should be complete by the end of the month. Staff anticipates that this project will be out
to bid in January or February, 1996.
The first project committee meeting for the design of the Duck Pond was held on Tuesday,
October 31, 1995. The landscape architect, the Alhambra Group, is currently working on
the park design. It is anticipated the project committee will meet in the next thirty days to
review the plan.
A design services contract was awarded to Albert Webb and Associates for the 6th Street
Parking Project. Preliminary site plans for that facility have been received and are being
reviewed by staff. This project will be designed in conjunction with the Temecule Shuttle
Project.
Sam Hicks Monument Park is currently out to bid. Bid opening is scheduled for November
30, 1995. It is anticipated an award of contract will be considered by the City Council on
December 19, 1995. If approved, construction will be in February, 1996.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
HELD NOVEMBER .14, 1995
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
7:44 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberrs, Parks
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson
and City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to
approve Consent Calendar Item Number 1.
AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Parks
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995.
AGENCY BUSINESS
Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan
Executive Director Bradley stated staff requests a continuance on this item to the
meeting of November 28, 1995.
Chairperson Parks declared the item continued by unanimous consensus.
r:\minutee.rda\l 11495 -1-
3. ProDosed Amendments to the Bylaws of the Old Town RedeveloDment Advisory
Committee
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report and
announced that Susie Bridges has been elected Chairperson and Ward Albert has
been elected Vice Chairperson of the Advisory Committee.
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberts
to approve staff recommendation as follows:
3.1 Review and approve the proposed amendments to the Bylaws of the Old
Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee.
The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Stone absent.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Bradley reported the Old Town Entertainment Project is moving forward,
and Mr. Buffman has secured the necessary options on property to keep the project in Old
Town.
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to
adjourn at 7:50 p.m. to a meeting on November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community
Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was
unanimously carried with Agency Member Stone absent.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Agency _Secretary
r:\minutes.rda\l 11495 -2-
ITEM 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Direr~gency Members
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director
NoVember 28, 1995
Revision to the Facade Improvement Rebate Program
Prepared By:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency do the
following:
Approve the Revision to the Facade Improvement Rebate
Program·
BACKGROUND
On April 25, 1995, the Redevelopment Agency adopted the Facade Improvement Rebate
Program. The program was intended to provide financial incentives to encourage small
businesses and property owners to rehabilitate the Tourist Retail Core District in Old Town and
to bring their property into conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan·
The first step in the Facade Improvement Program requires that a property owner obtain two
bids from licensed contractors to perform the rehabilitation work. Next, a written agreement
is entered into by the Agnecy and property owner. The agreement requires the property
owner to have the work completed by a contractor licensed by the State of California, and the
Agency to rebate the agreed upon percentage of the overall cost, once the work is completed
and inspected.
Staff has discussed the program with several interested property owners; some property
owners have informed staff that they could perform the rehabilitation work at a lesser price
than that of a licensed contractor. The increased costs have made potential rehabilitation
projects infeasible.
Therefore, staff is recommending that the Facade Improvement Rebate Program be amended
to require applicants to submit three bids, two of which shall be from licensed contractors.
Because no funds will be issued until the project is completed and finaled by the Planning and
Building Departments, staff feels that this is an adequate safeguard to insure all work will be
completed in a satisfactory manner.
R:\STAFFR.PT~i=ACAD~,.CC'2 11/20195 vs~ 1
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
1. Amended Facade Improvement Program
R:XSTAFFRP"f~FACADE. CC2 11116195 vsg 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROGRAM PARAMETERS
R:\STAFFILuT~i=ACADF,,CC2 11116195 vsg 3
ATFACHMENT NO. 1
Program Requirements
Applicants must submit two written bids from licensed contractors. Applicants of multiple
businesses within a building are encouraged to work together to receive one set of bids for the
entire building. This will reduce the cost per business. If the applicant intends ~o do the work
hint,~df/hersetf, they must supply an additional third written bid. In addition, if the applicant
inte. Pata m do the work hlmaelf/herseaf and rely upon the ownerfouild~r exceptions to State
Contracting law, the applicant must ~ompty with th~ parameters of that exception-including th~
requiremenl that only the appticant's employees may. be paid for the work or the total cost of the
work (labor and materials) must not exceed $300.00.
R:XSTAFFRPT~FACADE. CC'2 11r20/95 vsg 4
ITEM 3
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Redevelopment Agency Board Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
November 28, 1995
Professional Hospital Supply Owner Participation Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
Continue a public hearing for Professional Hospital Supply Owner Participation Agreement to
December 12, 1995.
DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends that the item be continued as a portion of the Owner Participation
Agreement has not been finalized.
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICi~E~~
CITY MANAGE
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENCY REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
November 28, 1995
Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council consider approval of an RDA small business loan to the Health Zone
(natural/health food store) to be located at the Temecula Plaza, Ynez and Solana Way.
DISCUSSION:
The City has received an application from the Health Zone to move to a new location and to
expand their facilities. The business was founded in 1990 by Paul Cook and Tom Watson.
Since the opening, sales have increased to where larger facilities are needed to better serve
'its customers and the new location will double the floor space with better customer exposure
and parking. With the move, the Health Zone will also be able to offer new and expanded
product lines. It is projected that this move will allow the business to increase sales by 50%
in the first twelve months.
The new property will be leased for a term of 5 years (60 months) with one 5 year option.
The loan amount requested is $100,000. The loan proceeds will be used for tenant
improvements, interior store fixtures and new refrigeration units.
The total requirement for the expansion is estimated at $130,000 of which the additional
$30,000 is coming from business reserves.
The terms of the loan are as follows: $100,000 amortized over a 5 year period at a rate of
9.75% with payments of $2112.42 per month. The loan is secured by all existing equipment
and all new equipment purchased for the expansion.
This loan is in conformance with the criteria of the RDA loan program and has been reviewed '
by our independent loan committee.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The loan approval would be subject to the receipt of a detailed list of the existing equipment
to be used at the new location ( including but not limited to serial numbers, description and
estimated worth) plus at the completion of the project, a list of all new equipment ( including
but not limited to serial numbers, description and cost). The City will file a UCC-1 and
Landlord's waiver on the furniture, fixtures and equipment. Funds will be controlled during
the construction of the tenant improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
To date, the City has funded $209,400 in redevelopment loans.
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
HELD NOVEMBER 14, 1995
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 7:50 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 4
ABSENT: 1
BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Birdsall
BOARD MEMBERS: Stone
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995.
It was moved by Board Member Parks, seconded by Board Member Roberts to
approve the minutes of October 17, 1995,
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts
NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone
ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Parks
Appraisal of the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities
District. No. 1
City Manager Bradley presented the staff report.
r:\minutes.fa - 1 -
It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Parks to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
2.1
Approve agreement to secure professional services for a complete narrative
appraisal on the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority Community
Facilities District, No. I and No. 2.
The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone absent.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. Financina for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bvoass Corridor
City Manager Bradley presented the staff report and recommended that this matter
be continued until the next scheduled meeting.
Chairperson Birdsall opened the public hearing at 8:53 PM.
It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Parks to
continue the public hearing to the meeting of November 28, 1995. The motion was
unanimously carried with Board Member Stone absent.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Parks to adjourn
at 8:53 PM to a meeting on November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation
Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously
carried with Board Member Stone absent.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
r:\minutes.fa -2-
ITEM 2
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENCY REPORT
TO: Board Members
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE:
November 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Financing for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western
Bypass Corridor
RECOMMENDATION: That the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority continue the four (4) Public Hearings listed below:
CFD I Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes
CFD 2 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes
CFD I Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 1
CFD 2 Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 2
DISCUSSION: The Mello-Roos statutes which govern formation and operations of a
Community Facilities District require that the Financing Authority enter into agreements with
any other public agency that will own or operate facilities within the proposed district. Since
the discussions and agreements with Rancho California Water District, Eastern MuniCipal
Water District and the Riverside County Flood Control District have not been finalized, staff
recommends the Public Hearing be continued to the meeting of December 12, 1995. At that
time, testimony will be taken from the public as it relates to the formation of the district.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
R:INORTONLLAGENDAS|FAPUBHRG, AGN I 1/06/95
p, M~DED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
~ING DATE OF HEARING
Old Town/W~t~ide Community Facilities Disuict Financing Authority
Community Pacilities Disuict No. 1
(Old Town Area Public !,m!nxr~ements)
Notice is hereby given that on September 12, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopted a Re,~lution
cntified 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/West~dc Community
Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention To Establish A Community l~acilities
District And To Authorize The Levy Of Special Taxes Punuant To The Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act Of 1982'. Pm'suant to the lVlello-Roos Community l=acilities Act
of 1982 (the 'Act') the Board of Direcwrs hereby gives notice as follows:
A. The text of said ~lution of Intention is as follows:
WHEREAS, under the Mello-Roos Community F-t-ilities Act of 1982, as mended
(the "Act*), Chapter 2.5 of part I of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of
the California Government Code, this Boai'd of Directon of the Old Town/Westside
Community Facilities Di.mia Financing Authority (the * Autharity") is authol'ized to establish
a community facilities district and to act as the legislative body for a community facilities
~, this Board of Directors now desires to procad with the establishment of
a community facilities district (the "District") in order to finance costs of public
infrastructure necessary or incident to development in the Old Town area of the City of
Temecuh (the *City').
NOW, TI4k'RF, FORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Directors of the Old
TowrffW~de Community F,cili,les District Financing Authority as follows:
.1. This Board of Directars proposes to conduct proceedings to establish a community
facilities district pursuant to the Act.
2. The name proposed for the District is Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public
Improvements).
c-lo
· ~. The proposed boundaries of the Dimict are as shown on the map of the Disu-ict
on file with the Secrem.~, which boundaries are hereby pre. minn,'ily approved and m which
map reference is hereby made for further paniculan. The Sea'em.ry is hereby directed to
record, or cause w be recorded, said map of the boundaries of the District in the office of
the County Recorder within fifteen days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, but in any
event at least fifteen days prior to the public hearing rden~d to in ~h 10 below.
4. The type of public fadlities propoF. d to be ~n=n_r~l by the District and pursuant
to the Act shall consist of those items listed as fadli~ on Bxhibit A hereto and by this
reference incorpomu~l herein (the "Fn~li~ies*). The Board of Direcwrs hereby finds and
determines that the public interest will not be served by allowin~ the p, ope~ty owners in the
District to enter into a contract in acwxdsnce with Section 53329.5(a) of the Act.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the DisU~ may enter into one or more conwatts directly
with any of the y,oyc~ty ownas with respea to the construc~ of the Fn~'li~es.
The Executive Directer of the Authority is hereby anthori-ed and directed to enter into joint
community facilities agreements with any entity that will own or operate any of the
Facilities, as determined by bond counsel to be nece~ry to comply with the provisions of
Section 53316.2(a) and (b) of the Act. The Board of Direct~'s of the Authority hereby
declares that such joint agi~ements will be beneficial to re~ident~ in the area of the District.
5. Except to the extent that fun& are otherwise av~lnhle to the District to pay for
the Facilities and/or the principal and inter. st as it becomes due on bonds of the District
issued to acquire .the Facilities, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by'
recordation of a con~-ming lien a~ainst all non-exempt real pxopc~ty in the District, will be
levied annually within the District, and collected in .the same manner as ordinary ~ valorera
property taxes or in such other manner as this Board of Directors or its desi~nee shall
determine, including direct billing of the affeaed pro~.,~ty ownas. The proposed rate and
method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real yxoixAy within the
District and the inter~ts in those parcels, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within
the proposed District to estimate the maximum mount such owner will have to pay, are
described in Bxhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
This Board of Directon hereby finds that the pwviions of Section 53313.6, 53313.7 and
53313.9 of the Act (relating to adjustments to ad valorera pwlx-tty taxes and schools
financed by a community facilities district) are inapplicable to the District.
6. It is the intention of this Board of Dh'eaon acting as the legislative body for the
District to cause bonds of the Authority to be issued for the District pursuant to the Act to
finance in whole or in pan the Facilities. Said bonds shall be in the a~regate principal
mount of not to exceed $12,500,000, shall bear interest payable semi-anunnlly or in such
other manner as this Board of Directon shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum
C-ll
rate of intorut as may be authorized by applicable hw at the time of sale of such bonds, and
shall mature not to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance thereof.
7. The levy of said proposed special tax shall be subject to the approval of the
qualffied electors of the District at a special election. The proposed voting procedure shall
be by mailed or hand-delivered ballot among the landowners in said proposed District, with
each owner having one vote for each acre or portion of an acre such owner owns in the
District.
8. F, xcept as may otherwise be pwvided by law or by the rate and method of
apportionment of the special taxes for the DisU4.a, all lands owned by any public entity,
including the United States, the State of California and/or the City, or any departments or
political subdivisi~ms thffeof, shall be omitted from the levy of the special tax to be made w
cover the costs and expenses of the Facilities and the Di.mia. In the event that a portion of
the propen~ within the District shall become for any reason exempt, wholly or in part, from
the levy of the special tax described in Bxhibit B, this Board of Difcctoxs will, on behalf of
the District, increase the levy to the extent nece~ upon the x, emsaining yxolxa Ly within the
District which is not exempt in order to yield 'the required debt sea'vice payments and other
annual expenses of the District, ff any, subject to the provisions of the rate and method of
apportionment of the special taxes for the Diah~ct.
9. The Executive ~ of the Authority, as the officer having charge and control
of the Facilities in and for the Disu'ict, or his dcsignee, is h~eby directed to study said
proposed Facilities and to mnk~, or cause to be m~,4~-, and file with the Secretary a report in
writing, presenting the following:
(a) A description of the Facilities by type which will be requized to adequately
meet the needs of the District.
Co) An estimate of the fair and reasonable cost of the Facilities including the
cost of acquisition of lands, rights-of-way and easements, any physical facilities required in
conjunction therewith and incidental ~ in connection therewith, including the costs of
the pwposed bond financing and all other related costs as provided in Section 53345.3 of the
Act.
Said report shall be made a pan of the record of the public hearing provided for
below.
I0. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in
the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vim Road, Temecula, California, be, and
the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of
Directon, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public heating on the
establishment of the District and consider and finally determine whether the public interest,
C-12
convenience and necessivy require the formation of the DisUict and the levy of said special
tax.
11. Thc Secretary is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be
given by publication one time in a newspaper published in the area of the District. The
publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven days bcforc the date herein set for
said hearing. Said notice ~hnll be substanfinliy in the form of F=xhibit C hereto.
12. The Authority Froposes to repay cemin landowners within the District, solely
from the proceeds of bonds of the City and the Authority issued for the Disuia, funds
advanced by such landownen to pay costs of the City and the Authority to form the District.
The procedures for such xt'payment will be set forth in dcmil in docvments to be approved by
this Board of D4fecton following the public hearing on the District referred to above.
13. The finn of Jones Hall Txi11 & White, A Professional Law Corporation, is hereby
confirmed as bond counsel for the DisU'ict and any bonds of the Authority for the District,
and the fn'm of Berryman & Henigar is hereby diesi,~nnted as special tax consultant to the
Authority for the DisUict. The ~=-xecutlve Dixector is hereby o,~ori.,ed and dh'ected to ente.,'
into conWacts with said firms fortheir services with respect to the Disnia, in form
acceptable to counsel to the Authority and the F, xecuti~ Dixector.
B. The exhibits to the Resolution which desre'be the facilities to be financed
and the rate and method of .apportionment of the special taxes for the district are on file in
the office of the Secretary of thc Authority,
C. The time and place established under said Resolution for the public hearing
required under the Act are Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as
soon as possible thcrcafter, in the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temccuh, California. '
D. At said heating, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayen for or
against the establishment of the district, the extent of the district or the furnishing of the
specified types of facilities will be heard~ Any person interested may file a protest in writing
as provided in Section 53323 of the Act. If fifty percent or more of the registered voten, or
six registered voten, whichever is more, residing in the territory proposed to be included in
the district, or the ownen of one-half or more of the area of land in the ten'itoxT proposed to
be included in the district and not exempt from the special tax, file written protests against
the establishment of the district and the pwtests are not withdrawn to reduce the value of the
pwtests to less than a majority, the Board of Directors shall take no further action to create
the district or levy the special taxes for period of one year from the date of decision of the
Board of Dixectors, and if the majority protests of the registexed voten or landownen ate
only against the fumishn'g of a type or types of facilities within the district, or against
C=13
l~vying a specifi~ special tax, thos~ types of facilities or th~ specified special tax will be
eliminated from th~ proceedings to form the dislzict.
E. The proposed voting procedure shall be by special mail or hand-delivered ballot to
the propen~ owners within the territory Froposed to be included in the district.
Dated: October '~, 1995
City Cl~rk
C-14
'AMENDIm NOTICE OF PUBIC B'v-4.RING
~ING DATE OF N'~ARING
Old Town/W~de Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 2
Notice is hereby given that on September 12, 1995, the Board of Direaors of the Old
Town/Westside Conununity Facilities Distria Financing Authority adopted a Resolution
enti~ed 'A Resolution of the Boani of Directars of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities DisUia Financing Authority of Intention To Establish A Community Facilities
District And To Authorize The levy Of Special Taxes Pursuant To The Mello-Roos
Community Fadli~es Act Of 1982'. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
of 1982 (the * Act*) the Board of Directors hereby ~ives notice as follows:
A. The text of said Resolution of ~ntentlon is as follows:
Wm;~'-4~q, under the Mello-Roos Community F~cifities Act of 1982, as mended (the
" '"), Chapmr 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commernc4ng at Section 53311, of the
Act
California Government Code, this Board of Dizecton of the Okl Tn/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") is autharized to establish a community
facilities dis=ict and to act as the legislntive bodyfor a community f~cifiti~s dira-ict; and
WW~,F2S, this Board of Directors now dedres to proceed with the establishment of
a community facilities district (the *District') in order to finance costs of public in/msmactu~
necessary or incident to development in the Westside area of the City of Temecula (the *City').
NOW, ~RE, BE IT !~'-~OLVED BY the Board of Directon of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities ~ Financing Authority as follows:
1. This Board of Directors proposes to conduct proceedings to establish a community
'facilities district pursuant to the Act
2. The name proposed for the District is Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority Community Facilities Disu'ia No. 2 (Westside Area Public
Improvements).
3. The proposed boundaries of-the District are as shown on the map of the District on
file with the Secretary, which boundaries are hereby pl~Brnin~rily approved and to which map
reference is hereby made for further particulars. The Secretary is hereby direaed to record, or
cause to bc recorded, said map of the boundaries of the Disuict in the office of the County
Recoi'der within fifteen days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, but in any event at least
fifteen days prior to the public hearing rden'ed to in paragraph 10 below.
4. The type of public facilities proposed to be financed by the District and pursuant w
the Act sb~ll consist of those items listed as f-ncili.~ on Exhibit A hereto and by this reference
incorporated herein (the 'Facilities*). The Boazd of Directon hereby finds and determines that
the public interest will not be served by allowing the FroyctLy owners in the District to enter inw
a contract in accordance with Section 53329.5(a) of the Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
District may enter into one or more contracts directly with any of the property owners with
respect w the construction of the l~acili~es.
The Executive Direaor of the Authority is hereby authori~,,d and dh*ected to enter inW joint
community f~eilitles agreements with any entity that will own or operate any of the
Facilities, as detemined by bond counsel to be necc$,s. y to comply with the provisions of
Section 53316.2(a) and Co) of the ACt. The Board of Direcmn of the Authority hereby
declares that such joint agreements will be bene~ci~ul to residents in the area of the District.
5. Except to the extent that funds ate othexwise available to the District to pay for the
Facilities and/or the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds of the District issued to
acquire the Facilities, a special tax su~ei,-nt m pay the costs thereof, secured by recordation of
a continuing lien against all non-exempt real F, oI~ty in the .District, will be levied annually
within the District, and collected in the same manner as ordinary m2r vdzlorem proper ty 1axes or
in such other n-,anner as this. Board of Directors or its de~Znee- shnn determine, including direct
billing of the affected yrc,p~.ty owners. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the
special tax among the parcels of real l,,oltaty within the DisUict and the interests in those
parcels, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner. within the proposed District to estimate the
maximum amount such owner will have to pay, arc ~bed in Exhibit B attached herera and
by this reference incorporated hcreh.
This Board of Directors hereby -finds that the provisions of Section 53313.6, 53313.7 and
53313.9 of the Act (relating to adjustments to sad valorera laol/=,ty taxes and schools
financed by a community facilities district) ate inapplicable to the District.
6: It is the intention of this Board of Directors acting as the legislative body for the
District to cause bonds of the Authority to be issued for the District pursuant to the Act to
finance in whole or in pan the Facilities. Said bonds shall be in the aggregate principal mount
of not to exceed $15,000,000, sb~ll bear interest payable semi-annually or in such other manner
as this Board of DirecWrs shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of interest
as my be authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds, and shall mature not
to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance thereof.
c-9
7. The levy of said proposed special tax shall be subject lo the approval of the qualified
electon of the Distzict at a special election. The proposed voting proc~u~ shall be by mailed
or hand-delivered ballot among the landowners in ssid pwposed District, with each owner
having one vote for each acre or portion of an acre' such owner owns in the District.
8. Except as may otherwi~ be provided by law or by the rate and method of
apportionment of the special taxes for the Diraict, all lands owned by any public entity,
including the United States, the State of California and/or the City, or any departments or
political subdivisions thereof, slnsa11 be omitted from the levy of the special tax to be made to
cover the costs and expenses of the Facilities and the District. In the event that a portion of the
property within the District shall become fat any teason exempt,. wholly or in pan, from the
levy of the special tax desczibed in Exhibit B, this Board of Directors will, on behalf of the
District, increase the levy to the =tent nece~ry upon the remaining ~,roFc~ty within the District
which is not exempt in order'to yield the requized debt senrice payments and other annual
expenses of the District, if any, subject m the provisions of the rate and method of
apportionment of the special taxes for the Dhttia,
9. The F. xecutive Diregtor of the Authority, as the o~wer having charge and control of
the F~cilities in and for the District, or his rJeeignee, is hereby directed to study said pro/x~sed
Facilities and to make, or cause to be made, and file with the SectemiT a report in writing,
presenting the following:
(a) A description of the Facilities by type which will be required to adequately
meet the needs of the District.
Co) An estirnale of the fair and re~ov,ble cost of the Facilities including the con
of acquisition of lands, fights-of-way and easements, any physical f~cilities required in
conjunction therewith and incidental expehs~ in connection therewith, inciuding the costs of thc
proposed bond financing and all other related costs as provided in Section 53345.3 of the Act.
Said report shall be made a pan of the record of the public heating provided for below.
10. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, be, and the
same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of
Directors, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the establishment
of the District and consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and
necessity require the formation of the District and the levy of said special tax.
11. The Secretmy is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given
by publication one lime in a newspaper published in the area of the District. The publication
of said notice shall be completed at least seven days before the date herein set for said hearing.
Said notice shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit C hereto.
C-10
12. The Authority proposes to repay certain landowners within the Disu'ict, solely from
the proceeds of bonds of the City and the Authority issued for the Distria, funds advanced by
such landowners W pay costs of the City and the Authority to form the District. The procedures
for such repayment will be set forth in detail in documents to be appwved.by this Board of
Directors following the public hearing on the Distri~ rderred to above.
13. The firm of Jones Hall Kxll & White, A Professional I~w Corporation, is hereby
confirmed as bond counsel for the District and any bonds of the Authority for the District, and
the firm of Berryman & Heni~ar is hereby designated as special tax consultant w the Authority
for the District. The Executive Dh'eaor is hereby authorized and directed to enter into conwacts
with said firms for their services with respect to the Distx~, in form acceptable to counsel w
the Authority and the Executive Director.
B. The exhibits to the Resolution which describe the facilities to be financed and the rate
and method of apportionment of the special taxes for the distria are on file in the office of the
Secretary of the Authority.
C. The time and place established under said Resolution for the public heaxing required
under the Act are Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible
thereafter, in the Community Recreation Center, 308'/5 Rancho Vim Road, Temecula,
California.
D. At said hearing, the testimony of all inUn'ested persons or taxpayers for or against
the establishment of the disuict, the extent of the disuia or the furnishing of the specified types
of facilities will be heard. Any person interested may file a protest in writing as provided in
Section 53323 of the Act. If fifty percent or more of the ~ voters, or six registered
voters, whichever is more, residing in the tm'ritory lyroposed to be included in the district, or
the owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the terriWry lm3po~ to be included in
the district and not exempt from the special tax, file written prom against the establishment
of the district and the prom are not withdrawn to reduce the value of the protests to less than
a majority, the Board of Directors shall take no further action to create the district or levy the
special taxes for period of one year from the date of decision of the Board of Directors, and if
the majority prom of the registered voters or landowners are only against the furnishing of
a type or types of fairies within the district, or against levying a specified special tax, those
types of facilities or the specified special tax will be eliminated from the proceedings to form
the district.
E. The propose~ voting procedure shall be by special mail or hand-delivered ballot to
the property owners within the t~ritory proposed to be includ~ in the district.
Dated: October 2, 1995
u~~.ty S~~C, City Clerk/
C-12
I~DRD NOTICE OF PUBLIC ~&RING
AMENDING DATE OF HEARING
Old Town/Westside Community F~cilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities Disn'ict No. 1
(Old Town Area Public Improv~ts)
Notice is hereby given that on Septelnber 12, 1995, the Board of Direaors of the Old
Town/West.side Community F~cilities District Financing Authority adopr=d a Resolution
entitled *A Resolution of the Board of ~ of th~ Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities Di~i2.1a FinancinE Autherity of Intention To Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the
Proposed Old Town/W~ Community Fut-ilifies Diraia Fin~ncinE Authority Community
Facilities Disuict No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) Pursuant To The Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982'. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
of 1982 (the 'Act') the Board of Directors hereby gives notice as follows:
~, this Board of ~ has this dale adopted its Resolution entitled 'A
Resolution of the Board of Di~ectoxs of the Old Town/Westslde Community Facilities
District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community F~,,411tles Di-hict and To
Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
of 1982", stating its intention to farm a community facilities distria pursuant to the
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 19112, as mended (the 'Act'), Chapter 2.5 of Pan
1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, for the purpose of financing
cevain public improvements (the 'Facilities'), as further pw~ded in said Resolution; and
WI~iEAS, this Board of Directors estimates the mount required for the financing
of a portion of the costs of the Facilities to be the sum of not to exceed $5,987,000; and
Wn'~'~-~l~, in order to finance a portion of the costs of said Facilities it is neces.~ry
· to incur bonded indebtedness in the mount of not to.exceed $12,500,000.
NOW, Ti~'~F-i~13RE, BE IT RESOLVI~, by the Board of DirecWn of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1. It is ~eces,~ry to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the
pwposed Old Town/Westside-Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community
Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the 'Di.m~') in the
mount of up to $12,500,000 to finance the costs of the Facilities.
2. The bonded indebtedness is proposea to be incurred for the purpose of
financing the costs of the Facilities, including acquisition and improvement costs and all costs
incidental to or connected with the accomplishment of said purposes and of the financing
thereof, as permitted by Section 53345.3 of the Act.
3. This lkmrd of Directms, acting as legislative body for the District, intends to
authorize the issuance and sale of bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of not
to exceed $12,500,000, bearing intcr~ payable semi-annually or in such other manner as
this Board of Directon shall determine, at a rite not to exceed the maximum rate of interest
as may bc authorized by applicable hw at the time of sale of such bonds, and maturing not
to exceed ,iO years from the date of the issuance of said bonds.
4. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible the~eafzr,
in the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temeatla, California, be,
and the same aze hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this
Board of Dizecton, as legislative body for the Distri~ will conduct a public hearing on the
proposed debt issue and consider and finally determine whether the public interest,
convenience and necessity require the issuance of bonds of the Authority for the District.
5. The Secvmry is hergby directedto cause notice of said public hearing to be
given by publication one time in a newspatuer of general ciradafion circulated within the
District. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven C/) days before the
date herein set for said public hearing. Said notice shall substantially in the form of Exhibit
A hereto.
B.' The liearing refen'ed to in the aforrs~d Resolution sNdl be at the tim
and place specified in said Resolution.
C. At that time and place the testimony of all. interested persons, including
persons owning prope~ in the area of the i)roposed community fncilities district, will be
heard.
Dated: October 2, 1995
June S. G~ CMC, City Clerk
Agency Secretary
~mos.FA~9S-03
~ED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
~ING DATE OF ~ARING
Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities Disuict No. 2
Notice is hereby given that on September 12, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopted a Resolution
en~~ed "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention To Inan' Bonded Indebtedness of the
Proposed Old Town/Westsidc Community F~c~lifies District Findracing Authority Community
Facilities DisUict No. 2 (W~de Area Public Improvements) Pursuant To The Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982:. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
of 1982 (the 'Act') the Board of Directors hereby gives notice as follows:
A. The te~t of said Resolution is as follows:
WHEREAS, this Board of Dirt~axs has this date sdopted ils Resolution entitled 'A
Resolution of the Board of Direaors of the Old Town/Weslside Comm~mlty Facilities District
Financing Authority of Intention to ~lish a Community Fs~eili~es District and To
Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
of 1982', stating its intention to form a community facilities district pursuant to the
Mello--Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as mended (the *Act*), Chapter 2.5 of Pan
I of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, for the purpose of financing
certain public improvements (the' *Facilities*), as further provided in said Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors estimates the mount required for the finan~g of
a portion of the costs of the Facilities to be the sum of not to exceed $10,000,000; and
WHEREAS, in order to finance a portion of the costs of said Facilities it is n__~c~_~ry
to incur bonded indebtedness in the mount of not to exceed $15,000,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1. It is necessary to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the proposed
Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Pacilities
District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) (the *District') in the mount of up to
$15,000,000 to finance the costs of the Facilities.
2. The bonded indebtedness is proposed to be incurred for the purpose of financing
the costs of the Facilities, including acquisition and improvement costs and all costs
incidental to or connected with the accomplishment of said purposes and of the financing
thereof, as pertained by Section 53345.3 of the Act.
3. This Board of Direaon, acting as legislative body for the District, intends to
authorize the issuance and sale of bonds in the maximum aggregate principal mount of not
to exceed $15,000,000, bearing interest payable semi-annually or in such other manner as
this Board of Directon shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of interest
as may be authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds, and maturing not
to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance of said bonds.
4. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in
the Community P, ecreation Center, 30975 Rancho Vista Road, Texnec-ln; California, be, and
the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of
Directors, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the proposed
debt issue and consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and
necessity require the issuance of bonds of the Authority for the District.
5. The Secretary is hereby directed to cause notice of mid public hearing to be given
by publication onc time in a newspaper of general draxlation ch'culated within the District.
The publication of said notice shrill be completed at least seven C/) days before the date
herein set for said public hearing. Said notice shall substantially in the form of Exhibit A
hereto.
B. The hearing referred to in the aforesaid Resolution sh~11 be at the time and
place specified in said Resolution.
C. At that time and place the testimony of all intere,r~ persons, including
persons owning proix, ty in the area of the proposed community facilities district, will be
heard.
Dated: October 2, 1995
gAn~e~j~Gr~t~yMC, City Clerk,
itaa~.FA~5-4B -3-
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
HELD NOVEMBER 14, 1995
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 7:52 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Birdsall
ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Board Member Roberrs, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to
approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1.
1. Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts
NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None
'ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone
ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Parks
r:\minutes.otwa\l 11495 -1-
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Board Member Parks, seconded by Board Member Roberrs to adjourn at
7:54 PM to a meeting on November 28, 1995; 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried
with Board Member Stone absent.
PM
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
r:\minutes.otwa\l 11495 -2-
ITEM NO. 22
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
. APPROV
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
OITY OF TEMEOULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager ~
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director
November 28, 1995
Draft Development Code
Prepared by: John Meyer, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council:
1. Open the public hearing and receive public testimony;
2. Adopt a Negative Declaration
3. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE CERTAIN GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA'S GENERAL PLAN
4. Introduce and Approve the first reading of an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND
CONSISTENCY ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP OF THE CITY TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL
PLAN
INTRODUCTION
On July 9, 1991, the City Council approved a contract with The Planning Center to assist the
City in preparing its first General Plan and Development Code. The General Plan was adopted
in November of 1993. The Development Code is the primary instrument for implementing the
General Plan. Temecula's General Plan is a 20-year plan, while the Development Code and
R:\DEVCODE\DEVCODE.CCI 11116195 klb 1
the Zoning Map respond to shorter-term needs and conditions. Each of the residential,
commercial, business park, and other land use designations are detailed by zoning districts
which specify permitted uses, conditional uses, and development standards for each zone.
The Code was developed pursuant to the authority granted to the City of Temecula by the
Constitution of the State of California and in compliance with the requirements of Section
65800 et.seq. of the Government Code, Planning, Zoning and Development Laws. The power
to zone or regulate is given to the City to promote and protect the communities health, safety
and general welfare. It is the aim of the Code to provide a serviceable, attractive and
economically viable city. State law requires that a city zoning ordinance be consistent with
a City's adopted General Plan.
The City desired a Development Code which established straight forward processes and
standards put forth in a manner understandable by both professionals and the public. To
accomplish this, the consultant was directed to seek out successful zoning ordinances from
other communities and draft a suitable ordinance for the City of Temecula.
To assist the staff and The Planning Center prepare the Development Code, the City Council
appointed a Development Code Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee consisted of
seven appointees by the Council, past Planning Commissioner Dennis Chiniaeff and
Councilmember Mu~oz. The Council Appointees were Larry Markham, Vince DiDonato, Don
Rohrbacher, David Christian, Doug Scott, Csaba Ko and Kevin McKenzie. The Advisory
Committee met on several occasions and reviewed a screen-draft code between July 1993
and August 1994. During this process, the Advisory Committee deliberated on many issues
and provided significant direction to staff. The consensus of the Advisory Committee is that
the draft code is a solid, well organized document.
PUBLIC HEARING
Between March 20 and October 16, 1995, the Planning Commission held seven public
hearings to receive 'testimony and public input on the Draft Development Code. As a result
of the consultant's work, the effort of the advisory committee and staff's pro-active approach
to receiving community input, there were virtually no controversial issues brought to the
Commission during the public hearings. The Commission considered all input and requests
and directed staff to make the appropriate revisions. Those revisions were then approved by
the Commission at its October 16, 1995 meeting. The November 9, 1995 draft of the
Development Code includes those revisions as approved by the Commission.
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
As part of the work program to adopt the Development Code, the City is conducting a
citywide consistency zoning effort. The purpose of this effort is to amend the zoning from the
interim County Districts to City Districts. This is fairly straightforward because almost every
General Plan Land Use Designation will be implemented by a single zoning district. The three
exceptions are the Low Residential, Business Park and Open Space designations.
Consistent with procedures used during the General Plan Process, property owners dissatisfied
with the district applied to their property were encouraged to submit a written request to staff.
The Commission reviewed, took testimony and provided direction individually on each request.
DEVCODE\DEVCODE.CC1 2
In addition to the consistency zoning effort, staff is also processing a City-sponsored General
Plan Amendment (GPA). The proposed amendment would modify General Plan land use
designations determined to be inappropriate subsequent to the adoption of the General Plan
in November, 1993 and to accommodate the requested changes to the zoning map. The
majority of these proposed changes will result in land uses more relevant with the existing
uses or buildings.
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENTS
During this process, staff has received several requests from property owners to amend the
land use designation on their property. To facilitate the review of these requests, staff has
developed the attached GPA Parcel Specific Land Use Request Matrix. The matrix contains
a location or parcel number, the existing land use designation, the requested land use
designation, and a staff recommendation and response. Each request is numerically keyed on
an accompanying exhibit. The applicants' letters of request stating their positions have also
been attached an numbered for the Council's review. The Commission reviewed, took
testimony and provided direction individually on each request.
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
Based on direction from the Commission, Staff has included a new chapter to the
Development Code entitled Planned Commercial Development Overlay District. The purpose
of this chapter will allow for the comprehensive and integrated development of large
commercial sites for certain limited commercial uses through site plan approval. Development
outside those limitations would be'subject to a specific plan and the underlying zoning
regulations. The Planned Commercial Development Overlay should allow large scale
development to take advantage of the superior environment which can result from large scale
community planning, and thereby reduce adverse environmental impacts of uncoordinated
development.
Attachments:
,2.
.3.
4.
GPA Parcel Specific Land Use Request Matrix - Page 4
Chapter 17.17, Planned Commercial Development Overlay - Page 5
Resolution No. 95- - Page 6
-Ordinance No. 95- Page 9
DEVCODE~DEVCODE.CC1 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
GPA PARCEL SPECIFIC LAND USE REQUEST MATRIX
DEVCODE\DEVCODE.CC1 4
E:
:a,:i >' >' o~ I= >' >' >'
:D i: .c_ · E'
'~oo c: '&,-.
m- -S o u._o,
:,,..a: ~ ~ ,,, ,-
e '~ e
>.. Z ~ >- m ):.~ >' >" 'o >,
'.i
E *o
._uu; >.
~ ~ ---
' ~.a'-
> ,~ :e
'~ o-~
~e~
~>;::!
>"-,:z!:: w .~
~!::~i~iiz ~""' w c ," ,. o c
:'"' !a: E ~' "' o o ~- ~: a: w a. EE '~ o
:-i..O, i:::~i o~ '~ ~ E ~ ~n m ,- E
" ~ ~ ~: =~'~' ~ ~ ,-
:! !::~>!::i: ~= ~ = = 3 a o~ w ~ c= ~ o '~ °~
::::i!':ii:c~m a. a. ): ~ .-,. w a.. ~"
w~ w ~'~c ~ cx
:; ~ ~ wO Z wew
:~.:~ :.L . .a ~ ~ ~_ > ~--
~: :: -F:,~" i ~ou EE ~
n 0:::: : c m '~ ~ m ce
-- fJ i n'- we~-
>-i 'u-o :5~,_"" ~' 'u
:!:~::a!i~' i ,c ~ ~, ,a w '~ o w w .-. w ~, -~ .g '~ c
:_: ,:,, ,_ "* ,, ,, ~,. ~;o =u.c~ ,, ~; ~ .:_~ ®.o
i: ::; e e e ,o ~ e 0 E 'o
,-~ mcwE
:::::m A"' :6 m m ~z '- m :; E Zrr
-- m ~.oZ
U ~ -~ ):: .,um _ o " a. wwcw
a. us. .-, o ~ w tu o I.-- 'u w ~ o rr O0
O~ 0 0 ~, ~n c~ 'o m-- ' ~ -6-o m-~ ,...
~D o o ~ o oSu ~ ~ 5~ ~
0
"' co ~> o ~ rnu ~e=,_ 6 w
,-,-
m c~_ E m m E mm_ E m E --~- E o_~' E
EE EE E E E EE
0 0 0 0 0 0
:ll:: (,) (J (J CJ (J CJ
"q:: ~ ..6 c~ ,,-,
SPECIFIC PLAIN u v EKI_,A 1
.~ Approved Specific Plan
.~ Proposed Specific Plan
. Areas
N~: S~e names of Spm~c Plan
Areas on followrang tmagt
Planned Commercial
Development Area
I
F
General Plan Program
· f
7"~~ THE
PLANNING
FIGURE 2-5
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CHAPTER 17.17
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
DEVCODE\DEVCODE.CC1 5
CHAPTER 17.17
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
Sections:
17.17.020
17.17.040
17.17.060
17.17.080
17.17.100
17.17.110
17.17.120
17.17.140
17.17.160
17.17.180
17.17.200
17.17.210
Planned Commercial Development Overlay District (PCDOD) Established.
Purposes
Definitions.
General Requirements: PCDOD.
Uses Permitted in the PCDOD Subject to Site Plan Approval
Requirements for Uses in the PCDOD Subject to Site Plan Approval
Uses Permitted in the PCDOD Subject to Specific Plan Approval
Procedures for Specific Plan Approval
Effect of Approval
Content of Specific Plan
Specific Plan Consistency
Amendment to Approved Plans
17.17.020 Planned Commercial Development Overlay District Established. The
Planned Commercial Development Overlay District is hereby established and shall be known
as "PCDOD."
17.17.040 Purposes. The Planned Commercial Development Overlay District is
designed to achieve the follbwing purposeS:
To provide for the classification and development of parcels of land as
complete, comprehensive, and integrated commercial projects so as to take
advantage of the superior environment which can result from large scale
community planning, and thereby reduce adverse environmental impacts of
uncoordinated development.
To permit limited uses as a matter of right, such as a comprehensive retail
center, while allowing for the diversification of land uses as they relate to each
other in a physical and environmental arrangement within the general
parameters of a retail or business park setting, while ensuring substantial
compliance with the provisions of this Chapter.
To provide fora zoning district encompassing various types of land uses such
as business parks, industrial parks, commercial centers, major value retailers,
power centers, or a combination of the uses through:
The development of a major retail center or "power center" as provided
in this Chapter, subject to site plan approval by the Planning
DEVCOOE\CHPTR17
Commission and .City Council; or
The adoption of a specific plan. and text materials which set forth land
use relationships and development standards to ensure that other
commercial development not approved through the site plan process
will be a comprehensive, integrated, and coordinated development for
property subject to this land use district.
17.17.060 Definitions. For the purposes of this Chapter, the following words and
phrases shall have the meanings set forth below:
'Major Value Retailer' shall mean an individual commercial retail establishment
containing a gross floor area in excess of sixty-five thousand square feet (65,000 sq.
ft.). Such major value retailers shall include large discount warehouse-style retail
sales enterprises such as Home Base, Home Depot, Price Club/Costco,'as well as
large-space high-volume specialty stores, such as Good Guys, Circuit City, Super
Crown Books and Toys R Us. Major value retailers also include major discount
department stores, like Wal-Mart, K Mart and Target. Such retailers do high
volume, large quantity, low frills service and sales. The terminology for a major
value retailer shall mean either a single retail use or single user of retail floor area
within a free-standing building or a single use or single user of retail floor area
incorporated within or attached to a power center.
'Power Center' shall mean a combination of one or more commercial establishments
planned, developed, and constructed on a single lot or parcel of land which includes
at least one major value retailer utilizing a gross floor area in excess of ninety
thousand square feet (90,000 sq. ft.).
Section 17.17.080. General Requirements: PCDOD. The following requirements
shall apply to all PCDOD areas:
Use regulations as set forth in Section 17.08.030 of this Development Code
pertaining to the Service Commercial (SC) zoning district, including uses listed
in Table 17.08(a).
Special use regulations and standards as set forth in Section 17.08.050 of this
Development Code.
Landscape requirements and standards as set forth in Section 17.08.060 of this
Development Code pertaining to the Service Commercial (SC) zoning district.
De
Performance standards as set forth in Section 17.08.070 of this Development
Code.
~OOE\CHPTR17 -2-
Environmental standards as set forth in Section 17.08.080 of this Development
Code.
All other relevant chapters of Title 17 of the Development Code, including,
but not limited to, Off-Street Parking and Loading (Chapter 17.24) and
Covenants for Easements (Chapter 17.26).
In the event of a conflict between PCDOD requirements set forth in Sections
17.17.110 et sea_. below and those requirements set forth in Section 17.17.080
A - F above, the Director of Community Development shall determine which
requirement best implements the intent of the Development Code.
Section 17.17.112}0. Uses Permitted in the PCDOD Subject to Site Plan Approval.
The following shall be permitted uses in the PCDOD subject to site plan approval and not
subject to commercial development standards under Section 17.08.040 of this Development
Code:
Ae
Detached major value retailer containing a gross floor area in excess of sixty-
five thousand square feet (65,000 sq. ft.) with no more than ten percent (10%)
of the gross floor space dedicated to use by multiple subvendors.
Power center including at least one major value retailer utilizing a gross floor
area in excess of ninety thousand square feet (90,000 sq. ft.). No major value
retailer tenant may dedicate greater than ten percent (10%) of its gross floor
area to multiple subvendors.
Section 17.17.110. Development Standards for Uses in the PCDOD Subject to Site
Plan Approval. The development standards for the PCDOD are generally the same as for
the requirements listed under Section 17.17.040. However, modifications to those standards
may be approved to allow for greater flexibility in reaching the objectives of the Planned
Commercial Development and compatibility with the General Plan. Variations to the base
standards shall be considered as a part of the review and approval of the Planned
Commercial Development
Section 17.17.120. Uses Permitted in the'PCDOD Subject to Specific Plan Approval.
All other uses in the PCDOD or.flay zone are subject to specific plan approval, including
general requirements outlined under Section 17.17.080 for all PCDOD uses and subject to
commercial development standards set forth in Section 17.08.040 of this Development Code.
Section 17.17.140. Procedures for Specific Plan Approval.
A. Pre-Submittal and Preparation. of Specific Plan
DEVCOOE\CHPTR17 -3- /
A preliminary application and application fee as set by resolution of the
City Council are required prior to filing a formal Specific Plan
application. A pre-applicafion conference with the Planning
Department representatives is'required prior to filing of the formal
specific plan application. This is intended to provide direction to the
applicant and to provide information prior to preparation of detailed
plans.
Prior to the preparation of a Specific Plan, the applicant shall hold a
public scoping meeting to identify potential community concerns about
the project. Public notice of the scoping meeting is required. Noticing
procedures shall be defined by the Planning Department at the pre-
application conference.
Hearing and Notice
Upon receipt in proper form of a Specific Plan application, or direction of the
City Council, a public heating.shall be set before the Planning Commission
and City Council. Notice of the hearings shall be given pursuant to the
requirements of Section 17.03.040 of this Development Code.
Planning Commission Action on Specific Plans
The Planning Commission shall make a written recommendation on the
proposed Specific Plan whether to approve, approve in modified form or
disapprove, based upon the findings contained in this Chapter.
Planning Commission action recommending that the proposed Specific Plan be
approved, approved in modified form, or denied shall be considered by the
City Council following Planning Commission action.
City Council Action on Specific Plans
Upon receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation, the City Council
may approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the proposed Specific
Plan based upon the findings contained in this Chapter.
Findings
A Specific Plan may be adopted only if all of the following findings are made:
(1)
The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan and the
Development Code.
'CODE\CHPTR17 -4-
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
The proposed Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City.
The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use
designations and the anticipated land use developments.
The proposed Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable
character which will be compatible with existing and proposed
development in the surrounding neighborhood.
The proposed Specific Plan is a fully integrated project.
Section 17.17.160. Effect of Approval. The Adoption of a Planned Commercial
Development Overlay District shall include an amendment to the Zoning Map. The
designation on Zoning Map shall include the designation "PCDOD" followed by a reference
number that corresponds to the name of the Specific Plan. Land Use designations and zoning
for the area will then be guided by the provisions of this Development Code or adopted
Specific Plan. If the Specific Plan does not address a particular standard, the provisions of
this Development Code shall apply.
Section 17.17.180. Content of a Specific Plan. A Specific Plan application shall
include a text and diagrams which contained all of the provisions outlined in Government
Code Sections 65451 and 65452.
The form and content of the Specific Plan shall contain, at a minimum, the following:
A boundary survey map of the property and calculations of the gross land area
within the proposed zoning district. A tentative subdivision map may be
substituted if the application proposes to subdivide the property.
A topographical map and general grading concept plan with specific sections
for sensitive areas.
A diagram, text, and exhibits describing the site, proposed land uses,
circulation, public facilities and services, and phasing.
A preliminary report describing anticipated requirements and proposed means
of providing utility facilities and public services, including but not limited to,
storm drainage, sewage disposal, water supply, parks and recreation and
school facilities.
E. A discussion of how the Specific Plan implements the applicable elements of
DEVCOOE\CHPTR17 -5-
the General Plan.
A description of site development standards including but not limited to, listing
of allowable uses, maximum and minimum regulations, required setbacks and
supplemental illustrations as required, establishing the basic community
architectural character, environmental character, and environmental design
qualities to be attained throughout the Specific Plan area.
A Phasing and Financing Plan to assure the adequate provision of public
utilities, improvements, and other facilities.
Other data and related exhibits deemed necessary by the Director of
Community Development, Planning Commission, or City Council.
Section 17.17.200. Amendment to Approved Plans. No public works project,
tentative map or parcel map may be approved, adopted, or amended within an area covered
by a Specific Plan, unless found to be consistent with the adopted Specific Plan.
Section 17.17.210. Specific Plan Consistency. Amendments to an approved Specific
Plans shall be made in the same procedure as followed when the plan was adopted. Any
adopted Specific Plan may also be repealed by the same procedure as the plan was originally
adopted. Prior to the adoption of an ordinance to repeal and discontinue a Specific Plan, the
City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission shall find that the plan
is no longer necessary for the orde~y and systematic implementation of the General Plan.
The repealing ordinance shall include provisions for the immediate application of appropriate
zoning to the area covered by the repealed plan.
~00E\CHPTR17 -6-
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
DEVCODEXDEVCODE.CC1 6
ATrACHMIWr NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR Tn'F. CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING CERTAIN GENERAL PLAN
AMENDlVI'ENTS TO THE CITY OF TEMECUI. A'S
GENERAL PLAN
Wlt'F. REAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
WltEREAS, On November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted
the General Plan.
WItFRIAS, Sections 65350 of the Government Code penits a city to mend the
general plan; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as mended (Sections
21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any
project the Lead Agency consider the potential impacts and effects of said project, consider
alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the
impact of the project on the environment; and
I~/}{F, REAS, the City of Temecula has prepared a Negative Declaration for the General
Plan Amendment in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines
prepared by the Office of Planning and Research; and
WHEREAS, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on March
20th, April 3rd, June 5th, June 19th, July 17th, August 21st, September 18th, and October 16th
1995 to consider the proposed General Plan Amendment; and
WltF. REAS, on October 16, 1995, the Planing Commission recommended to the City
Council that the Council approve and adopt the General Plan Amendment; and
WltF. REAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on November 28,
1995 to consider the proposed General Plan Amendment; and
NOW, T!:rEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF TE1VIECULA
DOES WEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Amendment to the General
Plan for the City of Temecula, as set forth on exhibit "A" as mended attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference. The General Plan Land Use Designation map for the City
DEVCODE\DEVCODE .CC 1 7
of Temecula is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared
for this project. The Initial Study identified no additional si~cant impacts beyond those
impacts identified in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the General Plan.
Therefore, the Negative Declaration for the General Plan Amendment is hereby adopted.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of November, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALII=ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I FrFREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 281h day of November
281h, 1995 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY C OUNCIIaVIEMBERS:
CITY C OUNCIIJVIEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
DEVCODE\DEVC ODE. CC 1 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
DEVCODE\DEVCODE. cc 1 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
AND CONSISTENCY ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE
ZONING MAP OF THE CITY TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
THE GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such
general plan as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance
shall be consistent with the adopted general plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, the process of preparing the zoning ordinance has included a number of
opportunities for public and citizen involvement included a number of town meetings, technical
committee meeting and public hearings, and by making numerous copies of the plan and
associated documents available to the public; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Sections
21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any
project the Lead Agency consider the potential impacts and effects of said project, consider
alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the
impact of the project on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has prepared a Negative Declaration for the Draft
Development Code and Consistency Zoning in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the
· CEQA Guidelines prepared by the Office of Planning and Research; and
WHEREAS, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on March
20th, April 3rd, June 5th, June 19th, July 17th, August '21st, September 18th, and October 16th
1995 to consider the proposed Development Code, Consistency Zoning, and Negative
Declaration; and
WHEREAS, on October 16, '1995, the Planing Commission recommended to the City
Council that the Council approve and adopt the Draft Development Code, Consistency Zoning
and Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on November 28,
1995 to consider the proposed Development Code, Consistency Zoning and Negative
Declaration; and
DE VCODE~DEVCODE. CC 1 10
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of
November, 1995 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
DEVCODE~,DEVCODE .CC 1 12
THY~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. NEGATIVE DECLARATION. The City Council hereby adopts the Negative
Declaration of Environmental Impact pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act for the Development Code and consistency rezoning.
Section 2. DEVELOPMENT CODE. The City Council hereby adds Title 17, Zoning,
to the Temecula Municipal Code, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference as the Development Code and Zoning Ordinance for the City of
Temecula.
Section 3. ZONING MAP. The City Council hereby adopts Exhibit "B" as the Zoning
Map for the City of Temecula.
Section 4. SEVERABIIJi~. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of
this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold
any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. NOTICE OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and shah cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shah be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shah certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTF~r} this 281h day of November, 1995.
ATI'EST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
DEVCODE\DEVCODE.CC 1
11
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORTS
APPROVAL~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official ~
November 28, 1995
Building and Safety October 1995, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for October, 1995.
Building Permits Issued ...................................... 81
Building Valuation .................................... $6,654,787
Revenue Collected ..................................... $65,516
Housing Starts ............................................ 57
New Commercial Starts ............................ I = 777 Sq. Ft.
Commercial Additions/Alterations ................... 9 = 14,589 Sq. Ft.
Building Inspections ...................................... 2,507
Valuation FY Year-to-Date .............................. 47,078,288
Agenda Report
November 28, 1995
Page 2
Code Enforcement Actions ................................... 840
Active Cases Pending ...................................... 126
Closed Cases ............................................ 25
V:%WIN~ende;~O~'e6.Rpt
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November-28, 1995
Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for October, 1995.
r:~agdrpt~moactrpt/ajp
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
NOVEMBER, 1995
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Don Spagnolo~.~
Date: November 28, 1995
I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
1. Moraga Road Street WidenincJ:
The project has been completed. Staff will be recommending acceptance of the
project once the contractor has submitted the maintenance bond and contractor's
affidavit.
2. Soorts Park Parkincj and Skate Board Park:
The contractor has constructed all of the curbs for the parking areas, placed the
concrete for the roller hockey rick, installed the sports lighting, poured concrete for
the sidewalks and started placing blocl( for the restroom building. The contractor will
continue construction of the restroom and start landscaping operation in November.
The project is expected to be completed by February, 1996.
3. Temecula Middle School Li~jhtin~J Project:
The contractor has completed all construction of the lighting project and is assembling
his as-builts drawings and required documentation for acceptance by the City Council.
4. Solana Way Storm Drain Improvements:
The contractor has completed the grading operation and has started placing concrete
for the 78" storm drain pipe. This project should be completed by the beginning of
next year.
5. Walcott Corridor:
The project is in the process of being awarded to Genesis Construction and once the
construction contact is fully executed a pre-construction meeting will be conducted.
The project will provide for the realignment of an underground waterline and a paved
road surface on Nicolas Road, Calle Giraslo, Calle Chapos, Walcott Lane and La Serena
Way. This project is scheduled to start in December and be completed by fall of next
year.
pwO4~moectrpt\cip\95~nov.mar 11 ~28~95
Monthly Activity Report
November 28, 1995
Page 2
6. Modification to Signal at Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road
This project will be installing additional signal heads to provide right turn arrows for
north bound traffic on Jefferson Avenue to go east bound on Winchester Road. The
contractor expects to perform all the work during the night of Sunday, November 19,
1995.
II. OUT TO BID
1. Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project:
Bids for construction are currently being solicited. Bids will be opened on November
30, 1995. The improvements include the construction of a 950 square foot
concession stand and restroom facility, asphalt parking lot, landscaping and irrigation
improvements, and assorted park site amenities.
2. Fire Station #84:
Bids were opened on October 19, 1995. A recommendation to the City Council to
award.the project to Great West Contractors is scheduled for November 14, 1995.
Construction is anticipated ';'o start during the beginning of December and be
completed by August, 1996. The project will include grading, sewer, road
improvements on Pauba Road between the new church site and Margarita Road,
construction of the new fire station and landscaping.
3. I-15/Winchester Road InterchancJe Modifications:
The plans and specifications have been approved and the acquisition of the two
sections of property became effective on September 1, 1995. Caltrans has also
released the encroachment permit for this project. Solicitation of Public Construction
Bids, which has been authorized by the City Council, began the week of November
13, 1995. The City will receive sealed bids up to 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, December
7, 1995. The project provides for the widening of the Winchester Road Bridge over
the. 1-15 freeway, the widening of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge, and the
construction of a new northbound loop ramp.
pw04~noectrpt~cip~95\nov.mar 11128/95
Monthly Activity Report
November 28, 1995
Page 3
III. WORK IN DESIGN
1. I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications:
The Project Report as well as the plans and specification were submitted to Caltrans
on June 16, 1995. Caltrans is in the process of reviewing these items and staff is
expecting comments to be returned to the Consultant during the month of November,
1995. This project provides for the widening of the Rancho California Road bridge
over the I-15 freeway and construction of a northbound loop ramp.
2. I-15/Overland Drive Overcrossing Imorovements:
The plans and specifications were submitted to Caltrans for final review at the end of
July, 1995. Caltrans has returned their comments to the Consultant. The City has
also reviewed the plans and specifications and returned comments to the Consultant.
The revised plans should be submitted to Caltrans during the month of December,
1995. The consultant is conducting a new soils investigation, which was requested
by Caltrans, for design of the piles supporting the bridge. Legal plats and descriptions
are being prepared for those properties that need to be acquired for construction of
the project.
3. Emergency Generator:
The project includes installing an emergency generator at the Community Recreation
Center to provide power for emergency operations. The decision was made to change
the location of the generator to allow better delivery and public access to the gym
entrance. The new location would be an area west of the gym. The engineer is
presently making the necessary changes. Staff will be requesting authorization to
solicit public construction bids from the Council in November.
4. Traffic Signal (~ Route 79S and Marqarita Road/Redhawk Parkway
Plans have been signed by the County & City. Caltrans has the plans for signature
and issuance of an encroachment permit. This project will be installing a complete 4-
way traffic signal and removing the median island on the south leg of the intersection
to provide for a dual north bound left turn pocket. This project requires an agreement
between the County of Riverside and the City for the costs of the design and
construction since the southeast corner of the intersection is within the County. Once
Caltrans issues an encroachment permit, staff will bring to the City Council a
recommendation to solicit bid~ and to approve the agreement between the City and
the County.
pw04\moactrpt\cip\95\nov.mar 11128195
Monthly Activity Report
November 28, 1995
Page 4
5. Interim Traffic Sicjnal ~ Route 79S and La Paz Street
The third plan check was submitted to Caltrans on October 16, 1995. Comments on
the plans have not been returned to the City. This project will be installing a 4-way
interim traffic signal at the intersection of Route 79S and La Paz St. The ultimate
improvements will be constructed when the highway is widened.
6. Interim Traffic Signal (6) Route 79S and Pala Road
'Received 2nd plan check comments from Caltrans. This project will be installing a 3-
way interim traffic signal at Route 79S and Pala Road. The ultimate improvements will
be constructed when the new Pala Road Bridge is constructed and the-highway is
widened. Consultant is expected to revise the plans and return them back to Caltrans
by the week of November 20, 1995.
7. Barrier Rail on Front St.'(6) Empire Creek
The plans and specifications have been completed. This project will install a barrier
rail on each side of Empire Creek at Front Str. eet. This project will be Federally funded
under the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program (HBRR). The
bidding process will start once Caltrans authorizes the City to bid the project.
pwO4\moactrpt~cip\95\nov.mer 11128195
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Monthly Activity Report
Special Projects
October, 1995
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Steve Cresswell~
Date: November 3, 1995
FEMA/OES REIMBURSEMENT:
Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State Office
of Emergency Services (OF, S) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to
the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has reimbursed the City a total of $952,832 to
date. The total cumulative reimbursable amount is $1,080,996.
Staff has also been coordinating with FEMA and OES in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City
due to the recent floods of January - March 1995. The total reimbursable amount being supported by the
FEMA/OES field team is $175,863.59 for the Phase I disaster. Staff has also applied for over $122,275 in
funding associated with the Phase II disaster.
PARKVIEW SITE (PROJECT NO. PW93-09):
Rough grading construction has been completed and City Council is anticipated to accept the improvements at
the November 281h meeting.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 159 (AD 159):
- Highway 79 South plans were approved by Caltrans. Phase I construction (Butterfield Stage Road to
Avenida de Missions) will go out to bid in October 1995 and is scheduled to begin in mid-January 1996.
Phase II construction (I-15 interchange to Avenida de Missions) will go out to bid in March 1996 and
scheduled to begin in mid-June 1996.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161 (AD 161):
- Winchester Road (Area II) - estimated completion date is January 1996
OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT/ENTERTAINMENT CENTER:
The following engineering design/study projects associated with the Old Town Redevelopment
Project/Entertainment Center are currently underway.
1. PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor. The horizontal and vertical alignments for Western
Bypass Corridor from Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road, with a grade separated
intersection configuration, has been determined. The design engineer is in the process of finalizing the
design on the portion of Western Bypass Corridor from the bridge over Murrieta Creek to Vincent
Moraga Drive and the extension of Vincent Moraga Drive.
r:/moactrpt/dev/gJ/October
PW95-08 - First Street Extension. The topography of Murrieta Creek has been completed. Based on
Federal Emergency Management Agency's and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District's design criteria, the hydrologic analyses from the confiuence of Murrieta Creek at Temecula
Creek upstream to north of Rancho California Road are being studied with the inclusion of both Western
Bypass Corridor and First Street bridges. The bridge designs will commence once the hydrology report
is completed.
RFP//32 - Western Bypass Corridor Assessment District. The Assessment District Engineer has been
working on the assessment spread to provide for an equitable spread based on benefit.
RFP#38 - 6th Street Parking Project. A site layout accommodating the proposed Temecula Shutfie
project, public parking and public restroom facilities has been prepared with extensive coordination with
the proposed transportation depot. The design will be presented to Council early January, 1996, and
we shall then proceed with the final design. Meanwhile, the alternative streetscape improvements arc
being analyzed.
r : l mo~cUlal d~ v19 510c tobe, r
0,9. __.
I,- ~,
0 l- w
w w
,¢
I-
o
oooo
uuuu
uuuo
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
November 1, 1995
Monthly Activity Report - October 1995
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of October 1995:
II.
III.
IV.
VI.
SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
TREES'
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street
sweeping concerns
POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
RIGHT~OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
STENCILING
A. 336 new and repainted legends
B. 32,838 L.F. of red curb new and repainted
C. 0 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding
VII.
27
11
0
2
98
28,483
71
10,217
r:\roads~actrpt~95%10 jle
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- October 1995
Page No. 2
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 15 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 12 service order requests for the month of September, 1995.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 38 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M.
surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies.
I.P.S. STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has comoleted the following:
· 0 L.F. of new and repainted striping
· 0 L.F. of sand blasting
The total cost for I.P.S. striping services was $0.00 compared to $0.00 for September, 1995.
PESTMASTER SERVICES has completed the following:
· 0 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $0.00 compared to $0.00 for August, 1
· Arbor Pro Tree Trimming removed I R.O.W. tree, total cost $250.00.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of September, 1995
was $14,775.00 compared to $14,764.00 for the month of September, 1995.
Account No. 5402
Account No. 5401
$250.00
$14,525.00
CC:
Steve Cresswell, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
r:\roads\actrpt\95\10 jle
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- October 1995
Page No. 3
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of October.
DATE
10/02/95
10/10/95
10/11/95
ACCOUNT NO. 5401
DEL RIO ENTERPRISE
STREETIC HANNEL/BRI DG E
Vallejo Channel
Mercedes @ 3rd Street
Margarita Road 500' south
of North General Kearney
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Remove silt and debris - restore grouted
rip-rap
Restore and modify desilting ponds
Restore grouted rip-rap
TOTAL COST
$5,200.00
$3,450.00
$875.00
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
DATE
10/25/95
10/25/95
10/25/95
10/25/95
STREET/CHANNEL/BRI DGE
Margarita Road
Santiago Road
Pala Road
Ynez Road
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Remove silt and debris, refine channel
Remove silt and debris, refine channel
Remove silt and debris, refine channel
Remove silt and debris, refine channel
TOTAL COST
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$1,000.00
r:\roads%ectrpt%95%10 jle
,¢ r..1 ~ ¢e ¢,e
0 "'
0
~.E g g g g g g~ g~ g ~
o
; :Z ..a.~=~o oo o o -- ~ ~ ,.- ~o
Lu o.!'
OrJ~
'
U
0
):
'~- ~o0~, z I~ I-~ am.~
Iz Wu, O ' ~ ~ W
w O)
:~ W
IB MI3E Z Z (/)e,¢lB
¢( u.I~Q¢w
n- Z W Z (-) U,I
) ¢ ~, '~ e"; a. ~ e w woow
0 ~ Z .(r) Z (/) er
Z
a, -r OE :: ~ 0~.
Z ~ :Z rr
z c~ ~ a:
~ ooo~8 o08 o,~ 08
0
DATE
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-05-95
10-05-95
10-05-95
10-05-95
10-05-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-06-95-
10-09-95
10-09-95
10-09-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL - OCTOBER, 1995
LOCATION
Winchester Road L~ I-15 Bridge
27480 Ynez Road
Santiago Road ~ Margarita
Margarita Road ~ Solana Way
Rancho California Road ~
Humber Road
Rancho Vista E/O Mira Loma
Villa Alturas ~ Pauba Road
Preece L~ Ynez Road
Margarita Road E/O Rustic Glen
La Serena Park
29760 Rancho California Road
27999 Front Stree(
26250 Jefferson
Ave. Barca ~ Margarita Road
27999 Front Street
Ave. Barca ~ Margarita
Margarita @ Southern Cross
30580 Rancho California Rd.
30559 Pauba Road
Pescado @ Calle De Velardo
La Serena ~ Margarita Road
Front Street ~ Main Street
Margarita @ Rancho Vista
Margarita N/O Winchester
Sports Park
42140 Lyndie Lane
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
RemOved
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
WORK COMPLETED
15 S.F. of Graffiti
7 S.F. of Graffiti
10 S.F. of Graffiti
5 S.F. of Graffiti
128 S.F. of Graffiti
2
80
110
26
390
498
156
12
68
36
300
50
46
20
60
6
2
194
150
100
50
S.F. of Graffiti
S;F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
-1- pwO3~oeds\wkcmpltd~95\10.Graffid 110195
GRAFFITI REMOVAL - OCTOBER, 1995
L10-10-95
'0-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-11-95
10-11-95
10-11-95
10-11-95
· ~---~ 0-13-95
'- .0-16-95
10-16-95
10-18-95
10-19-95
10-19-95
10-23-95
10-23-95
10-24-95
10-24-95
10-25-95
10-25-95
10-26-95
Ynez Road ~ Mervyn's
Channel behind Target Center
Margarita & Stonewall
Lyndie Lane
Miller's Outpost
Ynez N/O Town Center
Solana Way ~ Chlorine Station
Ynez behind Mervyn's
Solana Way ~
Motor Car Parkway
Across Street from Ford Dealer
La Serena
Calle Medusa @ La-Serena
Ave. Barca ~ Margarita
Kent Hintergardt Park
Margarita N/O Rancho Vista
Vincent Moraga @ Felix Valdez
Palm Plaza
Via Puerta ~ Camino Verde
N. General Kerney N/O Nicholas
at Bridge
Winchester N/O Nicholas at
Bridge
Rancho Cal Rd L~ Humbar
Via Puerta L~ Camino Verda
Humber ~ Yukon
Margarita ~ Moraga Road
Solana Way W/O Skywood
Rancho Vista L~ Calle Rio Vista
Aranda L~ Solana Way
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
25 S.F. of Graffiti
1,170 S.F. of Graffiti
162 S.F. of Graffiti
110 S.F. of Graffiti
20 S.F. of Graffiti
250 S.F. of Graffiti
90 S.F. of Graffiti
170 S.F. of Graffiti
605 S.F. of Graffiti
240 S.F. of Graffiti
120 S.F. of Graffiti
75 S.F. of Graffiti
50 S.F. of Graffiti
90 S.F. of Graffiti
6 S.F. of Graffiti
3 S.F. of Graffiti
3 S.F. of Graffiti
504 S.F. of Graffiti
75 S.F. of Graffiti
68 S.F. of Graffiti
904 S.F. of Graffiti
480 S.F. of Graffiti
3 S.F. of Graffiti
10 S.F. of Graffiti
40 S.F. of Graffiti
135 S.F. of Graffiti
316 S.F. of Graffiti
-~,- pw03\roads',wkcruplut\95\10.Graff~ti 110195
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-27-95
10-27-95
10-31-95
La Vida ~ Solana Way
Renate ~ Via la Vida
Margarita ~ Solana Way
Margarita Middle School
Margarita @ Ramsey Court
41770 Margarita
Via la Vida ~ Margarita
Solana Way @ Rycrest
29770 Solana Way
Ynez Road ~ Solana Way
Solana Way between Ynez
L~ Margarita Road
Solana Way between Margarita
& Via Norte
Via la Vida
Margarita L~ Solana Way
Moraga ~ Margarita
Lyndie Lane ~ End of Cul-de-sac
Joseph Road ~ Willow. Creek
Riesling ~ Meadows
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
3OO
450
240
25
115
15
12
15
125
85
41
108
22
35
20
240
87
20
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F. of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F. of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
TOTAL
,OCATIONS
TOTAL S.F.
71
10,217
-3- pw03Lroads\wkcmpltd\95\10.Graffiti 110195
DATE
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-02-95
10-05-95
10-05-95
10-05-95
0-05-95
10-05-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-06-95
10-09-95
10-09-95
10-09-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL - OCTOBER, 1995
· oo, ,o,' .I
Winchester Road ~ I-15 Bridge
27480 Ynez Road
Santiago Road ~b Margarita
Margarita .Road L~ Solana Way
Rancho California Road @
Humber Road
Rancho Vista E/O Mira Loma
Villa Alturas ~ Pauba Road
Preece ~ Ynez Road
Margarita Road E/O .Rustic Glen
La Serena Park
29760 Rancho California Road
27999 Front Street
26250 Jefferson
Ave, Barca ~ Margarita Road
27999 Front Street
Ave, Barca ~ Margarita
Margarita ~ Southern Cross
30580 Rancho California Rd,
30559 Pauba Road
Pescado ~ Calle De Velardo
La Serena ~ Margarita Road
Front Street ~ Main Street
Margarita ~ Rancho Vista
Margarita N/O Winchester
Sports Park
42140 Lyndie Lane
WORK COMPLETED
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
15 S.F. of Graffiti
7 S.F, of Graffiti
10 S.F. of Graffiti
5 S,F, of Graffiti
128 S.F, of Graffiti
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
2
80
110
26
390
498
156
12
68
36
300
50
46
20
60
6
2
194
150
100
50
S.F. of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S.F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S,F. of Graffiti
S,F, of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S,F. of Graffiti
-1- pw03~oads~,wkcmpltd\95\10.Graffiti 110195
GRAFFITI REMOVAL - OCTOBER, 1995
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-11-95
10-11-95
10-11-95
10-11-95
10-13-95
10-16-95
10-16-95
10-18-95
10-19-95
10-19-95
10-23-95
10-23-95
10-24-95
10-24-95
10-25-95
10-25-95
10-26-95
Ynez Road ~ Mervyn's
Channel behind Target Center
Margarita & Stonewall
Lyndie Lane
Miller's Outpost
Ynez N/O Town Center
Solana Way @ Chlorine Station
Ynez behind Mervyn's
Solana Way @
Motor Car Parkway
Across Street from Ford Dealer
La Serena
Calle Medusa ~ La Serena
Ave. Barca ~ Margarita
Kent Hintergardt Park
Margarita N/O Rancho Vista
Vincent Moraga @ Felix Valdez
Palm Plaza
Via Puerta @ Camino Verde
N. General Kerney N/O Nicholas
at Bridge
Winchester N/O Nicholas at
'Bridge
Rancho Cal Rd L~ Humbar
Via Puerta L~ Camino Verda
Humber @ Yukon
Margarita ~ Moraga Road
Solana Way W/O Skywood
Rancho Vista ~ Calle Rio Vista
Aranda L~ Solana Way
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
25 S.F. of Graffiti
1,170 S.F. of Graffiti
162 S.F. of Graffiti
110 S.F. of Graffiti
20 S.F. of Graffiti
250 S.F. of Graffiti
90 S.F. of Graffiti
170 S.F. of Graffiti
605 S.F. of Graffiti
240 S.F. of Graffiti
120 S.F. of Graffiti
75 S.F. of Graffiti
50 S.F. of Graffiti
90 S.F. of Graffiti
6 S.F. of Graffiti
3 S.F. of Graffiti
3 S.F. of Graffiti
504 S.F. of Graffiti
75 S.F. of Graffiti
68 S.F. of Graffiti
904 S.F. of Graffiti
480 S.F. of Graffiti
3 S.F. of Graffiti
10 S.F. of Graffiti
40 S.F. of Graffiti
135 S.F. of Graffiti
316 S.F. of Graffiti
-~- pw03~roads\wkcmpltd\95\10.Graf~ti 110195
10-26-95
10-26-95
'0-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
:)-27-95
10-27-95
10-31-95
La Vida L~ Solana Way
Renate ~ Via la Vida
Margarita ~ Solana Way
Margarita Middle School
Margarita L~ Ramsey Court
41770 Margarita
Via la Vida ~ Margarita
Solana Way ~ Rycrest
29770 Solana Way
Ynez Road ~ Solana Way
Solana Way between Ynez
~ Margarita Road
Solana Way between Margarita
& Via Norte
Via la Vida
Margarita L~ Solana Way
Moraga L~ Margarita
Lyndie Lane ~ End of Cul-de-sac
Joseph Road ~ Willow Creek
Riesling ~ Meadows
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
300
450
240
25
115
15
12
15
125
85
41
108
22
35
20
240
87
20
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
TOTAL
,OCATIONS
TOTAL S.F.
71
10,217
-3- pw03\roads\wl:cmpltd\95\10.Graffiti 110195
DATE
10-02-95
10-03-95
10-04-95
10-05-95
10-05-95
10-09-95
10-09-95
10-10-95
10-10-95
10-11-95
10-17-95
10-17-95
10-17-95
10-30-95
10-30-95
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - OCTOBER, 1995
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
LOCATION
Loma Linda ~ Pala Road
Nicolas Valley Elementary
Via Puerta ~ Camino Corte
Ave. Barca ~ Margarita
Corte Positas
Rancho Vista ~ Margarita
30552 Iron Bark
29770 Solana Way
30168 Malino Road
Margarita ~ Ave. Barca
41990 Greentree
Via Toreno ~ Randho Vista
45610 Olympic Way
River walk tract
39110 Rising Hill Drive
Weeds
Graffiti
Graffiti
Graffiti
Plugged storm drain
Graffiti
Plugged storm drain
Graffiti
Tree/A.C. failure
Graffiti
Debris ~ Catch Basin
Debris in street
Tree spliting
Channel concern
Tree concern in R.O.W.
10-03-95
10-03-95
10-04-95
10-05-95
10-05-95
10-09-95
,' 10-10-95
10-10-95
10-11-95
10-11-95
10-17-95
10-17-95
10-17-95
10-30-95
10-31-95
TOTAL S.O.R.'S
15
pwO3~roads\wk~mplUl\95\lO.svsrq 110695
DATE
10-02-95
10-03-95
10-05-95
10-09-95
10-11-95
10-12-95
10-16-95
10-17-95
10-23-95
10-25-95
"""~0-26-95
10-27-95
10-30-95
10-31-95
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
OCTOBER, 1995
STENCILING
· LOCATION.
Area #2
Ynez N/O Motorcar Parkway
Area #1
Area #1
Area #1
Area #2
Area #1
Bike Lanes
Winchester @ Enterprise
Circle South
Bike Lane/City Wide
Area #1
Area #1
Area #1
Area #2
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Installed
2 Arrows &
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
Repainted
WORK COMPLETED
17
3,950
35
37
39
68
53
20
210
200
65
4,627
8,070
11,099
4,682
Legends
L.F. of Red Curb
Legends
Legends
Legends of
Red Curb
Legends
-Legends
Legends
L.F. of 8" Solid
White Line
L.F. of Red Curb
Bike Lane Legends
L.F. Red Curb
L.Fo Red Curb
L.F. Red Curb
L.F. Red Curb
TOTAL NEW &
REPAINTED
LEGENDS
TOTAL NEW &
REPAINTED
RED CURB
TOTAL
SANDBLASTING/
GRINDING
336
32,838 L.F.
PWO3~ROADS~WKC~PLTI)\95\10.~I'EN~IL 110395
DATE
10-03-95
10-11-95
10-12-95
10-12-95
10-17-95
10-18-95
10-19-95
10-23-95
10-24-95
10-24-95
10-25-95
10-30-95
10-30-95
'LOCATION
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
OCTOBER, 1995
R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT
Pala Road S/O Loma Linda
La Serena E/O Pina Colada
Rancho Vista @
Southern Cross
South General Kearney
Area #1
Area #2
Area #2 & #3
Area #4
Area #3
Via Norte to
Calle Pina Colada
Felix Valdez @ Sixth Street
Ynez between
Rancho California Road
& Equity Road
Margarita N/O Winchester
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated'
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
'WORK COMPLETED ·
510 S.F. of R.O.W.
Weeds
1,550 S.F. of R.O.W.
Weeds
200 S.F. of R.O.W.
Weeds
95 S.F. of R.O.W.
Weeds
3,650 S.F. of R.O.W.
Weeds
5,000 S.F. of R.O.W.
Weeds
6,400 S.F. of R.O.W.
Weeds
600 S.F. of R.O.W.
3,500 S.F. of R.O.W.
1,570 S.F. of R.OoW.
420 S.F. of R.O.W.
2,500 S.F. of R.O.W.
2,488 S.F. of R.O.W.
TOTAL S.F.
R.O.W. WEED
ABATEMENT
28,483
-1- pwO3Xroads\wkcmpltd\95\Og.W==ds 100395
DATE
10-17-95
10-23-95
LOCATION
Main Street @ Pujol
Winchester @ Enterprise Circle
South
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
TREE TRIMMING
OCTOBER, 1995
I
Trimmed
Trimmed
WORK COMPLETED
I Tree
I Tree
TOTAL
TREES
TRIMMED
2
-1- pwO3~oads~,wkcmpi~\95\lO.Trees 110~95
DATE
10-06-95
10-10-95
10-11-95
10-16-95
10-16-95
10-17-95
10-20-95
10-23-95
10-24-95
10-24-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-26-95
10-27-95
10-27-95
10-30-95
10-30-95
10-31-95
10-31-95
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
LOCATION
La Colima @ N. Gen. Kearney
Margarita @ T.V.U.H.S.
McCabe
Butterfield Stage N/B Pauba
Target Center on
Rancho California Road
Main Street @ Pujol
Pio Pico @ Calle Rendova
Winchester @
Enterprise Circle South
Via Norte @ Del Rey Road
Nicolas W/O
N. General Kearney
Santiago @ Margarita
Winchester @
Enterprise Circle South
Margarita @ Via la Vida '
Solana Way @ Via Norte
Winchester @
Enterprise Circle South
Corte Sierra @ Loma Linda
Margarita @ Rustic Glen
Margarita @ Rustic Glen
Rising Hill
ROADS DIVISION
OCTOBER, 1995
SIGNS
t
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Installed
Replaced
Replaced
Installed
Installed
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Installed
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
TOTAL SIGNS
REPLACED
TOTAL SIGNS
INSTALLED
TOTAL SIGNS
REPAIRED
.WORK COMPLETED
W-45 "T.C."
SR4 Graffiti
W-65 "T.C."
W-17 "Missing"
6 Delineators
R-1 Graffiti
2 N.W.S.
R-18, R-18-2,
5 Delineators
R-1 Graffiti
R-2 "50" "T.C."
"P" Marker "Missing"
R-7, R-7 A "T.C."
Type "N" & Carsonite
2 R-1A "Missing"
I Delineator
N.H.W.
3 Carsonites
W-56 & Type "N"
W-31 & Type "N"
2__7
1__1
PW03~I.0AI)S/m,VKCMl~LTD\95~I0.SIGNXINSTA.IJ., 110295
TRAFFIC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
For October, 1995
TRAFFIC REQUESTS and PLAN CHECKS
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Marty Lauber
Date: November 15, 1995
TRAFFIC REQUESTS: August Sept Oct
Received 3 13 14
Completed 4 8 11
Active 23 24 28
Scheduled for Traffic Commission 2 2 7
WORK ORDERS ISSUED. I I 4
STRIPING PLANS REVIEWED 7 2 3
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS REVIEWED' 1 0 .1
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES REVIEWED 2 I 0
NOTE: Traffic Signal Plans for the Western Bypass at I st Street and Front Have also
been reviewed.
II. DIVISION PROJECTS:
As
We are researching available Traffic Accident Reporting software to automate
enhanced data retrieval and plotting opportunities. All optional programs will
accelerate both Police and Traffic Engineering operations.
We have developed new traffic analysis zones (TAZ) for our local travel forecast
model. WRCOG has selected the Southwest area Planning District (SWAPD) as the
first regional area to be updated and connected directly to the conforming model in
Riverside. This completes Phase One of this Three Phase Project.
r:~no~ctt~t\trtffic\9~\O| .oct
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER /~
CITY MANAGER ·
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
November 28, 1995
Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Discussion:
Caseload Activity:
Receive and File
The following is a summary of the Planning Department's
caseload and project activity for the month of October 1995:
The Department received 12 applications for administrative cases and 2 applications for public
hearing cases for the month of October:
Parcel Map 1
Revised Permit 1
TOTAL 2
Ongoing Projects:
Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project: As part of their work on the Sixth Street
parking lot, Webb & Associates will be designing the offsite improvements and
standards for the related components of the project. These will then be used as design
standards for off-site improvement in Old Town.
Desion Guidelines: A field trip with the City's consultant, Design Guideline Committee
and staff was held September 25, 1995. Draft design guidelines preparation is
underway.
Development Code: The Planning Commission has completed the public hearing
process. The Council will review the Code on November 28, 1995.
Murd¥ Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: Staff has reviewed the
revised Specific Plan and is preparing comments for the applicant to address. The
screen check draft EIR has not yet been submitted for review.
R:\MONTHLY.RPT~I995\OCT 11116195 vgw
Johnson Ranch Specific Plan: This item will be scheduled for a public hearing after the
City Council takes action on Annexation policies for the City. These policies are
currently being formulated and will be presented to the City Council as soon as they
are completed.
RoriDauah Ranch Soecific Plan: The Planning Commission held a public workshop on
September 11, 1995 and directed the applicant to reduce the density and the total
number of units as well as to be more sensitive to the surrounding land use by
increasing the buffer area and providing a transition of lot sizes. The Commission
provided additional direction to the applicant. No future hearing date has been
established.
Attachment:
1. Revenue and Status Report - Page 3
R:~.MOIfI'I-ILY.RFI~!995\OCT 11116195 v~w 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
R:\MONTHLY.ILPTXI995\OCT 11/16/95 vpt 3
REVPRIN2
11/06/95
001
161
ACCOUNT #
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
4106
4107
4108
4109
4110
4111
4112
4113
4114
4115
4116
4117
4118
4119
4120
4121
4122
4123
4124
4125
4126
4127
4128
4129
4130
4131
4132
4133
4134
4135
4136
4137
4138
4139
4140
4141
4142
4143
4144
4145
4146
15:20:30
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
AMENDED FINAL MAP
APPEALS
CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE
EXTENSION OF TIME
SINGLE'FAMILY TRACTS
MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS
PARCEL MAPS
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
MINOR CHANGE
PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS)
RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION MAPS
REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS)
SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER
SECOND UNIT PERMITS
CHANGE OF ZONE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CONSISTENCY CHECKS
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
PLOT PLAN
PUBLIC USE PERMIT
REVISED PERMIT
SETBACK ADJUSTMENT
SPECIFIC PLAN
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE
TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
VARIANCE
ZONING INFORMATION LETTER
CEGA (INITIAL STUDIES)
CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
GEOLOGY CEQA
GEOLOGY ORD, 547 APZ
LAFCO
PARCEL MAP/WAIVER
MERGER
AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR, MAP
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
CONDO TRACT NAP
REVERSION TO ACREAGE
LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK
LOT LINE ADJUST, PLAN CHECK
CERT, OF CORRECT, PLAN CHECK
CERT, OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK
COND. CERT, OF COMPL, PLN. CK,
CERT,' OF PAR, MERGER PLAN CK
CITY OF TEMECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
OCTOBER 1995
ADJUSTED
ESTIMATE
.00
325.00
800.00
6,000.00
6,850.00
5,332.00
8,996.00
1,380.00
940.00
1,000.00
.00
392.00
.00
520.00
13,256.00
29,248.00
4,440.00
4,827.00
57,190.00
10,765.00
6,446.00
1,250.00
9,254.00
1,715.00
2,548.00
.00
1,142.00
.00
.00
6,202.00
4,000.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
784.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
OCTOBER
REVENUE
.00
.00
100.00
268.00
.00
.00
547.00
690.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
528.00
.00
590.00
.00
.00
.00
30.00
.00
.00
.00
578.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
1995-96
REVENUE
.00
325.00
300.00
1,676.00
.00
.00
2,120.00
920.00
.00
.00
.'00
.00
.00
.00
2,746.00
590.00
.00
4,128.00
8,8~2.00
4,297.00
2,272.00
250.00
.00
2,358.30
268.00
.00
571.00
.00
4,098.35
.00
4,000.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
PAGE 1
BALANCE % COL
.00
.00 100.0
500.00 37.5
4,324.00 27.9
6,850.00 0.0
5,332.00 0.0
6,876.00 23.6
460.00 66.7
940.00 0.0
1,000.00 0.0
.00
392.00 0.0
.00
520.00 0.0
10,510.00 20.7
28,658.00 2.0
4,440.00 0.0
699.00 85.5
48,348.00 15.5
6,468.00 39.9
4,174,00 35.2
1,000.00 20.0
9,254.00
(:~3.30-1
2,280.00
.00
571.00 50.0
.00
4,098.35- ***
6,202.00 0.0
.00 100.0
.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00- ***
.00
.00
.O0
784.00 0.0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
REVPRIN2
11/06/95
ACCOUNT #
4147
4148
4149
4150
4151
4152
4153
4154
4155
4156
4157
4169
4170
4175
4180
4200
4206
4226
4260
4261
4262
4369
15:20:30
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
VACATIONS PLAN CK
DOCUMENT PROCESSING
CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK
REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK
PARCEL MAP PLAN CHECK
TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK
AMENDED MAP PLAN CHECK
4TH & SUBS. SUBMITTALS
FENA STUDY REVIEW
LONA REVIEW
DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW
IMPROVE iNSPECTiON ON-SiTE
K-RAT STUDY FEES
FAST TRACK PLANNING
FORHA FAST TRACK
IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS
ANNEXATION FEES
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
ACCESSORY WiND ENERGY
LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACZLZTY
LAND DIV UNiT MAP
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK
CITY OF TEMECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
OCTOBER 1995
ADJUSTED
ESTIMATE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
1,480.00
.00
.00
10,045.00
710.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
748.00
.00
OCTOBER
REVENUE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
740.00
1995-96
REVENUE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
3,020.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
187.00
5,110.00
PAGE
BALANCE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
1,480.00
.00
.00
7,025.00
710.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
561.00
5,110.00-
% COL
0.0
30.1
0.0
25.0
PLANNING 198,585.00 4,571.00 48,578.65 150,006.35 24.5