HomeMy WebLinkAbout121295 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior
to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that
meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
DECEMBER 12, 1995- 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation:
Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 95-14
Resolution: No. 95-100
Reverend David French, Temecula United Methodist Church
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans
Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone
Proclamation - Lt. Col. Donald T. Rohrabacher, (USMC Ret.)
Presentation of Award to Winner of the Old Town Temecula
Logo Contest to winner Don Berg
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out
and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
R:~Agenda%121296 1
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
3
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1995.
Release Labor and Material Security in Parcel MaD No. 22629
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the City Council Authorize release the Labor and Material portion of the
security for the improvement of streets and drainage in Parcel Map No. 22629.
4.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer.
R:'~a~gende%121296 2
6
Acceotance of Public Streets into the Cit~/-Maintained Street System - Tract 20848
(located southwesterly of Nicolas Road at Via Lobo)
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95- ..
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACCEPTING
CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACT NO. 20848)
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System - Tracts 21674-3 and
21674-F
(located southwesterly of the intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACCEPTING
CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACTS NO. 21674-3 AND 21674-F)
Release of Monument Bond in Tract No. 21674-F
(located southwesterly of the intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Authorize the release of the Subdivision Monument bond in Tract No. 21674oF.
7.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer.
Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council approve
the proposed Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets.
3
R:~t~eree%121296
9 Western Bypass Assessment District 95-1
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE ACQUISITIONS AND
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WESTERN BYPASS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
95-1
9.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND DIRECTING
ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO
10
Bids for Walcott Corridor Project PW 94-10
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Reject all bids and authorize staff to re-advertise the Walcott Corridor Project upon
acquisition of the necessary right-of-way.
10.2 Authorize the City Clerk to return bid bonds to all bidders.
11
Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of Plans and Specifications for Traffic Siqnal
Installation at Mamarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79(S) - Project PW95-15.
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of
Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW95-15, Traffic
Signal installation at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-
79(S) upon receipt of Caltrans approval.
R:~Agendzl\ 121285 4
12
Coooerative Agreement for Fundina Traffic Sianal - Intersection of Maraarita
Road/Redhawk Parkway and State Route 79 (S)- Project No. PW95-15
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95- .
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE
CITY OF TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH FUNDING FOR INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC
SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA ROADIREDHAWK PARKWAY
AND SR-79(S)
13
Completion and Acceotance of the Moraaa Road Street Widenino - Proiect PW92-10
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the Moraga Road Street Widening, Project No. PW92-10 as complete and direct the
City Clerk to:
13.1 File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond and accept a one (1)
year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract.
13.2 Release the MaterialS' and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
of Completion, if no liens have been filed.
14
Professional Services Aareement for Geotechnical Observation and Testing for Project No.
PW95-09. Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84.
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Approve the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and
Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers for Geotechnical Observation and Testing
for Project No. PW95-09, Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station
84 for an amount not to exceed $33,649.00.
14.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING,
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING,
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
R:~,Oendm\12129G 6
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
President Ronald H. Roberrs
DIRECTORS:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 95-01
Resolution: No. CSD 95-07
Lindemans, Birdsall, Parks,. Stone, Roberrs
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an
item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak,
please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to
Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your
name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 28, 1995.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
2. Election of Officers for 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Entertain motions to elect a President to preside until the end of calendar year
1996.
2.2 Entertain motions to elect a Vice President to preside until the end of calendar year
1996.
R:~gende~121296 6
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT- Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: December 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~a~Oenda\l 21296 7
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING E::." '...
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson I:ionald J. Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 95-01
Resolution: No. RDA 95-08
Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment
Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not
listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should
be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1. Advanced Chemill Systems Owner Participation Aareement
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AN
OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ADVANCED CHEMILL SYSTEMS, A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
R:'~a, gende\121296 8
2. Election of Officers for 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Entertain motions from the Agency Members to elect a Chairman to preside unti|
the end of calendar year 1996.
2.2 Entertain motions from the Agency Members to elect a Vice-Chairman to preside
until the end of calendar year 1996.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. Professional HosPital SUODIV Owner Particioation Aareement
(Continued from the Meeting of November 28, 1995)
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Continue the public hearing to the meeting of December 19, 1995.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:%Aeend.e%121296 9
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
Next in O~der:
Resolution No.: No. FA 95-06
CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda a pink "Request
To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to.speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 28, 1995.
PUBLIC HEARING
e
Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
Financing for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bvoass Corridor
(Continued from the meeting of November 2'8, 1995)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS
WITH RESPECT TO COMPLEXITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
(OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
R:'~,genda~,l 21296 10
2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS
· WITH RESPECT TO COMPLEXITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2
(WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC HEARINGS
AUTHORITY BUSINESS
3. Election of Officers for 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Entertain motions to elect a President and Vice President to preside over the
Financing Authority for calendar year 1996.
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
296 11
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
President Patricia H. Birdsall
Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda a pink "Request
To Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 28, 1995.
2. Election of Officers
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Entertain motions to elect a President and Vice President of the Improvement
Authority to preside until the and of calendar year 1996.
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:Vqler, da\l 21296 12
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
15
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
ReQuest to Desiqnate Certain Private Prooertv as "No Skateboardina, Rollerbladinq or
Similar Activity Area"
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DESIGNATING PRIVATE PROPERTY AT 42690 MARGARITA ROAD AS A "NO
SKATEBOARDING, ROLLERBLADING OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY AREA" PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 10,236 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
16 Adoption of the 1994 Editions of Various Model Buildina Codes
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Open the Public Hearing, receive comments from the public, if any, and continue
the public hearing to December 9, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of hearing
testimony for or against the adoption of Ordinance No. 95- and on findings to be
adopted in connection therewith.
16.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
CHAPTERS 15.04 AND 15.08 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING
FOR FEES AND ENFORCEMENT OF BUILDING REGULATIONS; AND AMENDING
CHAPTERS 15.04 AND 15.08 OF THIS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY
REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO:
THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF
THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR THE
ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM
HOUSING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM SWIMMING POOLS, SPAS
AND HOT TUB CODE; AND THE 1993 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL
CODE
R:~.AOenda\121296 13
17
Adootion of the 1994 Edition of The Uniform Fire Code
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Open the Public Hearing, receive comments from the public, if any, and continue
the public hearing to December 9, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of hearing
testimony for or against the adoption of Ordinance No. 95--- and on the findings to
be adopted in connection therewith.
17.2
Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1994 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE
CODE STANDARDS, 1994 EDITION.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
18 Election of City Council Officers for 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to elect the Mayor to preside until
the end of calendar year 1996.
18.2 Entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to elect the Mayor-Pro Tem to
preside until the end of calendar year 1996.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: December 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~Agende%121296 14
PROCLAMATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the Greater Temecula area and southwest Riverside County has been
fortunate to have benefitted from the services of a special citizen for over a decade; and
WHEREAS, Lt. Col. Donald T. Rohrabacher (USMC Pet.) has served his community
and his nation as a fighter pilot in the U.S. Marine Corps from 1939 to 1964, serving with
distinction in World War II, the Korean War and in Viet Nam; and
WHEREAS, he was elected to serve on the Mt. San Jacinto Community College District
Board of Trustees in November of 1990 and he served on the Mt. San Jacinto Foundation Board
of Directors for five years prior to that time; and
WHEREAS, through his efforts in securing the financing and acquisition of property,
his 'great American Dream' of a college campus for this area was realized; and
WHEREAS the Menifee Campus of Mt. San Jacinto Community College came into being
in 1993 and currently has the operating capacity to serve 6,000 students;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jeffrey E. Stone, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim December 12, 1995 to be,
"Don Rohrabacher Day*
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 12th day of December, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM
1
ITEM 2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXtlIRIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~ DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands
the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are
hereby allowed in the mount of $1,083,826.71
Section 2. The City Clerk shah certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADO~, this 12th day of December, 1995.
ATFEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resoo\88 '
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMFfULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 12th day of December, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CO~CII,MEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
R~os~88 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
11/30/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/12/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/30/95 TOTAL PAYROLL:
157,275.56
803,187.71
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 12/12/95 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL $ 725,819.92
1 oo GAS TAX 27,371.06
110 RANCHO CALIF ROAD REIMB DIST 0.00
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 0.00
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 0.00
165 RDA-LOW/MOD 148.18
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 55,655.03
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 1,050.73
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 237.84
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 24,005.53
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 183.26
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 31,267.65
220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST. 0.00
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 0.00
280 RDA-CIP 42,382.72
300 INSURANCE 274.96
310 VEHICLES 0.00
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 37,733.27
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 909.79
340 FACILITIES 13,333.33
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 0.00
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE 0.00
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL $ 75,071.03
100 GAS TAX 16,217.17
165 RDA-LOW/MOD 490.74
190 TCSD 20,753.17
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 529.67
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 693.90
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,244.75
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 398.65
280 RDA-CIP 2,045.81
300 INSURANCE 552.18
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,527.78
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 637.59
340 FACILITIES 2,201.00
TOTAL BY FUND:
RONALD E. B~L~. CI~ MANAGER ' ~
$ 1,083,826.71
$ 960,463.27
123,363.44
$ 1,083,826.71
FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 10
11/30/95 16:03
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/NO0 SET ASIDE
190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP
300 iNSURANCE FUND
3ZO ]NFORNAT]ON SYSTENS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
ANOUNT
61,133.24
18,967,54
148,18
23,823.45
235.15
237.84
5,426.20
183.26
10,450.47
17,166.85
274.96
4,985.30
909.79
13,333,33
157,275.56
VOUCHRE2
'95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26454
26455
26456
26457
26458
26459
26460
26461
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
r~S3
S
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
502553
525622
525622
525622
525622
525622
525622
f
16:03
CHECK
DATE
11/17/95
11/21/95'
11/21/95
11/21/95
11/21/95
11/21/95
11/22/95
11/27/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
002123
000523
000523
000374
000268
001353
000321
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000Z83
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
VENDOR
NAME
BROiJN, CHUDLE I GH, SCHULER
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
EASTERN'MUNICIPAL i,/ATER
SOUTHERN CALl F EDISON
RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT
NATIONAL INFONRATION DA
SEAR, ROEBUCK AND CONPA
UBNOSKE, DEBBIE
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (]RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS),
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
APPRAISAL-OLD TOIIN ENTER PRJT
INSTALL SEMER a SAM HICKS PRK
ENG & INSPECT RANCHO SPT PRK
INSTALL ELECT FACt SAM HICKS
K-RAT FEES FOR OCT 1995
NATIONAL ZIP CODE DIRECTORY 96
REPLACE OLD VACUIJN-CITY HALL
CASH AD/LEAGUE CITZES/UBNOSKE
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
00028] FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
00028.:3 FEDERAL
00028.$ FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
00028] FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
00028] FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
00028] MEDICARE
00028.:3 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
00028,$ NEDICARE
000283 NED]CARE
000~83 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000~ SDI
00044~+ SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
280-2645
280-199-805-5802
210-190-137-5802
280-199-805-5802
001-2300
001-120-999-5228
340-199-999-5242
001-161-502-5258
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
193-2070
280-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
ITEM
AMOUNT
11,000.00
120.00
500.00
1,596.64
10,315.50
46.90
351.21
300.00
11,961.54
2,738.17
36.93
2,817.47
75.63
82.92
389.42
76.68
224.77
113.Tr
397.96
94.32
147.26
2,662.70
590.63
15.91
714.34
18.19
23.16
81.09
14.48
69.34
20.58
54.42
21.14
69.64
47.86
10.12
44.65
6.38
8.89
3,216.56
713.81
12.57
PAGE 1
CHECK
ANOUNT
11,000.00
120.00
500.00
1,5~6.64
10,315.50
46.90
351.21
300.00
23,512.46
VOUCHRE2
11/30/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
525622
525622
525622
525622
525622
525622
525622
525622
525622
525622
26464
26465
26466
26466
26467
26468
26469
26470
26471
26472
26473
26474
26475
26475
26476
264T7
26477
26478
2647~
2647~
26479
26479
26480
16:03
CITY OF~TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/]0/95
11/]0/95
11/30/95
11/]0/95
11/]0/95
11/30/95
11/]0/95
11/]0/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/]0/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/]0/95
000444
0004~+4
000444
000444
000~4
000444
0004~.4
000444
0004~+4
000444
002001
001910
000370
000370
001237
000398
000152
001590
000135
000135
000138
000138
002036
002036
002036
002036
000146
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE 190-2070
FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~ STATE 191-2070
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE 192-2070
FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/~ STATE 193-2070
FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~ STATE 194-2070
FIRSTAX CEDD) 000/~4 STATE 280-2070
FIRSTAX (EDD) O004Je4 STATE 300-2070
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~4 STATE 320-2070
FIRSTAX (EDD) O00~z~ STATE 330-2070
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~+4 STATE 340-2070
ALCO CAPITAL RESOURCES
AMERITECH COMMUNICATION
BIRDSALL, PATRICIA
BIRDSALL, PATRIEIA
BUCKLES, THERESE
CPRS
CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL
CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECR
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPHEN
CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
CALVERY CHAPEL OF NURRI
CAREY, NANCY
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CHASE MDC INC
CITICORP NORTH AMERICA
CITICORP NORTH AMERICA
CITY OF HEMET
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
COUNTS UNLIMITED
11/30/95
SHARP COPIER LEASE-FIRE STATIO 001-171-999-57_59
SERV AGREEMENT-RICOH COPIER 330-199-999-5217
LEAGE OF CITIES-10/20-10/25
EMPLOYEE PAID EXPENSE
001-100-999-5258
001-1170
REISSUE CK/REFUND-TCSD CLASS 190-183-4982
MEMBERSHIP: P RUSE
190-180-999-5226
MEMBERSHIP:'G ROBERTS/96
MEMBERSHIP:S NELSON
RDA CONF:S.NELSON:l/22-26/96
001-140-999-5226
190-180-999-5226
190-180-999-526i
STORM WTR PERMIT/PW-95-09 210-190-626-5804
REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT
· REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION
TEMPORARY "NO PARKING" SIGNS
TAX
190-2900
190-18]-4982
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-524~
REFUND:OVERPAYMENT BID PACKAGE 001-199-4060
LEASE PMT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM 320-199-999-5391
LEASE PMT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM ]20-2800
CONF:STONE:R ROBERTS/12/7/95 001-100-999-5258
REPROGRAPHIC SRVCS/C]TY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS SRVCS/CITY HALL
REPROGRAPHIC SRVCS/C]TY HALL
REPROGRAPHIC SRVCS/C1TY HALL
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-580~
TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRAM 95-96 100-164-602-5406
I TEM
AMOUNT
675.39
12.87
10.54
91.02
16.70
44.14
33.32
99.17
15.12
17.88
552.73
217.18
192.01
10.95-
15.00
130.00
100.00
130.00
685.00
250,00
100.00
30. O0
80. O0
6.20
30. O0
1 ,Z~9.Z]
57. O0
8.15
8.15
8.15
28.45
800, O0
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
5,076.99
552.73
217.18
181.06 ,.
15.00
130.00
1{
13o.oo
685.00
250.00
100.00
30.00
86.20
30.00
1,427.57
57.00
52.90
80~-aO
VOUCHRE2
16:03
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26481
26482
26482
26483
26484
26484
26485
26486
26487
26488
26489
26490
=~,90
,90
26491
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
26492
CHECK
DATE
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001233
001233
000155
001669
001669
002113
000754
002125
001056
000165
000165
000165
000165
001135
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000993
VENDOR
NAME
D F M ASSOCIATES
DAN'S FEED & SEED, iNC.
DAN'S FEED & SEED, ZNC,
DAVLIN
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATiO
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO
EDBORGS CUSTOM FENCING
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
EMERGENCY PET CLINIC
ENDLESS CREATIONS
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, ]NC,
FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANYw
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANYw
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
~96 CALIF ELECTIONS COOE BOOKS
PROPANE GAS SUPPLY
PROPANE GAS SUPPLY
BROADCASTING OF COUNCIL MTGS.
RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT
RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT
FENCE REPAIR FOR THE VILLAGES
LDSCP INSPECTION SERVS
VET SERVS FOR K-9/POLICE DOG
DECORATIONS-CITY HALL CEREMONY
RCHO VISTA SPT PRK REPAIRS
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL COSTS
.MONTICELLO FILLER-JAN 96
STORAGE BINDER
CLASSIC FILLER-REFILL JAN96
BLK ZIPPER BINDER
CLASSIC FILLER
SHEET PROTECTOR
NAVY CLASSIC BINDER
CLASSIC MASTER FILLER
CARD POUCH
ZIPPER BINDER ~/i4R]ST STRAP
SEASONS MASTER FILLER
ZIPPER POUCH
NAVY BINDER
FILLER
POUCH
SHEET PROTECTOR
FRE i GHT
TAX
FRANKLIN REFILLS 96
FRANKLIN REFILLS 96
FREIGHT
TAX
BEVERAGE SERVICE - CITY HALL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-120-999-5228
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
001-100-999-5250
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5250
001-170-999-5294
001-150-999-5265
190-180-999-5415
001-140-999-5230
001-161-502-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-150-999-5248
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
340-199-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
35.00
5.06
5.28
800,00
104.73
113.04
175.00
225.00
25.00
80.00
594.91
39.87
23.81
9.50
37.47
90.00
27.50
7.50
20.95
65. O0
26.95
3.00'
65. O0
26.95
1.95
65.00
33.50
1.95
65.00
33.50
1.95
3.00
9.00
35.47
33.50
107.80
9.50
11.69
135.89
CHECK
AMOUNT
35.00
10.34
800.00
217.77
175.00
225.00
25.00
80.00
594.91
110.65
90,00
655.66
135.89
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/30/95 16:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER]OUS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
26~94 11/30/95 001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS
26~94 11/30/95 001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS
GRIT SAND FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 100-16~-601-5218
TAX 100-16~-601-5218
90.00
6.98
96.98
26~95 11/30/95 00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-181-11Z3/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
26~95 11/30/95 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN RE-ISSUE CK 25749 320-199-999-5208
26~95 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-693*0956/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-4354 PALA COHN PRK 320-199-999-5208
26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-4356 K.H. MEN PRK 320-199-999-5208
26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-694-1993/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
26495 11/]0/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-694-4353/PALA PARK 320-199-999-5208
26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-695-3564/ALARM 320-199-999-5208
26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-8632 GEN USAGE 320-199-999-5208
26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-2475/PUBLIC WORKS 100-164-601-5208
26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-7945/CRC FIRE ALARN 320-199-999-5208
543.32
207.41
31.87
28.84
29.32
1,191.38
28.84
60.78
31.79
39,05
60.50
2,253.10
26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220
26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220
26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220
26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220
26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220
26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220
26497 11/30/95 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO ERGONONIC KEYBOARD 320-199-999-5221
26498 11/30/95 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH LOGO FOR AWARDS PRESENTATION 190-180-999-5222
26498 11/30/95 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH- TAX 190-180-999-5222
127.34
12.90
671.12
46.07
45.79
52.41-
150.46
90.00
6.98
850.81
96.98
26499 11/30/95 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, ALARM MONITORING - CITY HALL 340-199-999-5250
35.00
35.00
26500 11/30/95 001343 HC~/E WELDING & FABRICAT FABRICATION TO STENCIL TRUCK 100-164-601-5215
186.66
26501 11/30/95 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL CHEMICALS
190-182-999-5212
182.10
182.10
26502 11/30/95 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS SARN 001-2140 1~4.51
26502 11/30/95 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS CARN 100-2140 144.51
289.02
26503 11/30/95 001652 JERRY KELLETT PAINTING PAINTING SERVICES FOR C.R.C.
26503 11/30/95 001652 JERRY KELLETT PAINTING SEAL SOUTH GYM WALL
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
120.00
300.00
420.00
26504 11/30/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP WE 11/12 EVANS 001-165-999-5118
26504 11/30/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP WE 11/12 EVANS 001-165-999-5118
26504 11/30/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP WE 11/12 EVANS 100-164-604-5118
26504 11/30/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP WE 11/12 LUJAN 190-180-999-5118
72.80
72.80
72.80
353.60
572.00
26505 11/30/95 001036 KENPER REAL ESTATE NANA REISSUE/REIMB.1/2 OF UTILITIES 190-180-999-5240
970.19
970.19
26506 11/30/95 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I STATIONERY OFFICE SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220
26506 11/30/95 000206 KINKOrS OF RIVERSIDE, ] NlSC COPY SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220
26506 11/30/95 000206 KINKO~S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC COPY SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220
26507 11/30/95 LEE, MICHAEL REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 190-18.3-4982
24.24
14.57
22.90
40.00
61.71
VOUCHRE2
' 195
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26508
26508
26508
26508
26508
26509
26510
26510
26510
26510
26511
26512
26513
26513
26514
"~14
~14
26514
26515
26515
26515
26515
26515
26515
26515
26515
26516
26516
26517
26517
26518
26519
26519
26519
26519
26519
26520
16:03
CHECK
DATE
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001513
001513
001513
001513
001513
001891
000414
000414
000414
000414
000653
000214
001967
001967
000220
000220
000220
000220
000220
00138/,
001384
001384
00138~
001384
001384
00138~
00138~
001892
001892
000883
000883
002101
001584
001584
001584
001584
001584
002105
002105
VENDOR
NAME
LIBERTY AUTO CENTER
LIBERTY AUTO CENTER
LIBERTY AUTO CENTER
LIBERTY AUTO CENTER
LIBERTY AUTO CENTER
LINFIELD SCHOOL
LONGS DRUG STORE
LONGS DRUG STORE
LONGS DRUG STORE
LONGS DRUG STORE
LUCKY STORE, INC.
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
NANPOf. IER TEMPORARY SERV
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
NAURICE PRINTERS, ]NC.
NAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MOBILE MOOULAR
MOBILE MODULAR
MORTELEORE EXCAVATING
MONTELEORE EXCAVATING
MY BUDDIES PIZZA
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT TCSD
VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT-TCSD
VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE REPAIRS & NA]NT-TCSD
VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT-TCSD
INTERIM FIRE STATION - RENT
FILM PURCHASE AND PROCESSING
FILM PURCHASE AND PROCESSING
FILM PURCHASE AND PROCESSING
FILM PURCHASE AND PROCESSING
TCSD CLASS SUPPLIES
COUNCIL MEETING 11/28
TEMP HELP W/E 11/12 LIPOSCHAK
TEMP HELP W/E 11/19 LIPOSCHAK
COIqP ANNUAL FISCAL REPT COVERS
CLEAR CONBS/CAFR
TAX
PRESS RELEASE LETTERHEAD
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS
BUSINESS CARDS
TAX
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS-J. BARRON
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS-POLICE DEPT
TAX
SEPT LEASE PNT-INTER]N FIRE
TAX
DESILTING DANS-CALLE DE VELARD
REMOVAL OF DIRT ~ NEW CITY HAL
REFRESHMENT:CITY HALL CEREMONY
TAX FORMS/W-2
WINDOW ENVELOPES
TAX FORMS/1099
FREIGHT
TAX
VEHICLE NAINT. & REPAIR
VEHICLE MA]NT. & REPAIR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-171-999-5470
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-183-999-5320
001-100-999-5260
100-164-601-5118
100-164-601-5118
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
280-199-999-5264
280-199-999-5264
100-164-604-5222
190-180-999-5222
100-164-604-5222
190-180-999-5222
001-171-999-5222
001-171-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-171-999-5470
001-171-999-5470
100-164-601-5401
210-190-1/,4-5804
001-150-999-5265
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-9~9-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
100-164-601-5214
100-164-601'-5214
ITEM
AMOUNT
48.50
66.33
164.28
15.58
232.52
600.00
8.93
8.93
8.93
11
30.00
80.00
634.40
594,75
583. O0
44.00
48.59
?3.00
5.66
76.50
38.25
5.92
2.96
102.50
7.94
76.50
5.92
685. O0
53.09
7,700.00
9,200.00
290.00
81.74
29.35
36.41
10.00
11.43
12,00
35.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
527.21
600.00
38.43
30.00
80.00
1,229.15
754.25
316.49
738,09
16,900.00
290.00
168.93
VOUCHRE2 PAGE
11/30/95 16:03
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOO$
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26520
26520
26520
26520
26521
26522
26522
26522
26523
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26524
26525
26526
26526
26526
26526
26526
26526
26526
CHECK
DATE
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
002105
002105
002105
002105
002088
000239
000239
000239
000635
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
001958
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
VENDOR
NAME
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVXCE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TYPEWRITER
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
PARTY PALACE, THE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEESr RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RET]RE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEESr RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE
PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RET]RE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR
VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR
VEHICLE NAINT, & REPAIR
REPAIR TYPEWRITER IN CSD
TEMP HELP W/E 10/22 GRAGE
TEMP HELP W/E 10/22 GRAGE
TENP HELP W/E 10/22 GRAGE
PARTY SUPPLIES:CITY HALL CEREN
000246 PER REDE
000246 PER REDE
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
OOO266 PERS RET
OOO266 PERS RET
000266 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
OOO246 PERS RET
. OOO246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
001958 PERS L-T
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-163-999-5214
100-164-601-5214
001-163-999-5214
100-164-601-5214
190-180-999-5242
001-162-999-5118
001-161-501-5118
001-161-502-5118
001-150-999-5265
001-2130
100-2130
001-2390
100-2390
165-2~90
190-2390
191-2190
192-2190
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2390
100-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-Z390
320-2390
330-2]90
340-2390
100-2122
001-150-999-5260
210-199-650-5806
210-199-650-580~
001-110-999-5258
001-162-999-5262
100-164-604-5260
001-161-502-5260
ITEM
AMOUNT
15.95
164.19
126.19
25.00
184.30
151.20
97.20
97.20
185.19
191.61
65.19
13,058.92
2,483.17
82.54
2,983.11
94.44
120.29
324.86
75.17
226.21
106.83
282.54
109.7'5
349.87
50.20
10.60
.23
12.60
.47
.93
1.39
.23
.78
.46
.93
.93
2.09
51.70
13.76
24.14
27.43
35.00
11.00
4.50
6.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
378.33
184.30
345.60
185.19
20,636.32
51.70
VOUCHRE2
16:03
C]TY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26526
26526
26526
26526
26527
26527
26528
26528
26528
26528
26529
26530
26531
J2
26532
26533
26534
26534
26534
26534
26534
26535
26535
26535
26535
26535
26536
26536
26536
26537
26537
26537
26537
CHECK
DATE
11/30/95
11/30/95
11130195
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11130/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000580
000580
000253
000253
000253
000253
0012~4
000255
000728
000947
000947
000947
000262
000262
000907
000907
000907
000907
000907
000426
000426
000426
000426
000426
001680
001680
001680
OOO266
000266
000266
000266
000266
000266
VENDOR
NAME
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PHOTO IdORKS
PHOTO MORKS
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
PRICE COSTCO, INC.
PRO LOCK.& KEY
RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CAR WASH
RANCHO CAR WASH
RANCHO CAR WASH
RANCHO CAR WASH
RANCHO CAR WASH
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO ]NDUSTR]AL SUPPL
RAY GRAGE AND ASSOCIATE
RAY GRAGE AND ASSOCIATE
RAY GRAGE AND ASSOCIATE
RIGHTMAY
RIGHTMAY
RIGHTMAY
RIGHTMAY
RIGHTMAY
RIGHTWAY
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH RE]MBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
FILM, SLIDES AND PICTURES
FILM, SLIDES AND PICTURES
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
REFRESHMENT:CITY HALL CEREMONY
TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVS/JANiTONS
REP/TEST BACKFLOt,/PREV DEVICES
BLUEPRINTS REPOGRAPHICS
BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION
BLUEPRINTS REPOGRAPHICS
VARIOUS WATER SERVS
.VARIOUS WATER SERVS
VEHICLE MAINT & DETAIL
VEHICLE MAINT & DETAIL
VEHICLE MAINT & DETAIL
VEHICLE MAINT & DETAIL
VEHICLE MAINT & DETAZL
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
INDOSTRIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS
OCT PROF PLAN CK SERVS
OCT PROF. PLAN CK SERVS
OCT PROF PLAN CK SERVS
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL-PRKS
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL-PRKS
PORTABLE TO]LET RENTAL-PRKS
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL-PRKS
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL-PRKS
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL-PRKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-199-999-5260
001-110-999-5260
001-150-999-5250
001-162-999-5260
001-162-~-5242
001-100-999-5258
001-100-~99-5258
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
001-161-501-5230
001-161-502-5230
100-164-604-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-150-999-5265
340-199-~99-5212
190-180-~9-5212
001-1280
280-199-805-5802
330-199-999-5220
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
001-165-9~9-5214
001-163-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
190-180-~-5263
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
340-199-999-5212
340-199-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
ITEM
AMOUNT
40.67
29.00
15.47
22.00
29.21
31.80
23.85
11.52
15.01
34,38
34.37
15.00
19.40
150.00
155.70
30.00
9.06
282.74
21.55
1,2~4.65
4,084.16
4.00
23.22
24.00
98.62'
24.00
46.55
54.78
69.81
166.22
~6.55
2,342.85
1,602.97-
641.60-
62.89
125.78
62.89
251.55
386,88
50.39
CHECK
AMOUNT
313.83
26.53
103.15
150.00
155.70
30.00
313,35
5,328.81
173.84
383.91
98.28
940.38
VOUCHRE2 PAGE__8
11/30/95 16:03
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26538
26538
26539
26540
26540
26541
26542
26542
26542
26542
26542
26542
26542
26543
26543
26544
26545
26545
26545
26545
26545
26546
26546
26546
26547
26548
26549
26550
26551
26551
26552
26553
26553
26554
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
11/30/95
11130195
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
000678
000678
RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE
RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE
000406 RIVERS]DE CO. SHERIFF'S
000271 ROBERT BEIN, t4N FROST &
000271 ROBERT BE]N, WH FROST &
RODRIGUEZ, LANETTE
000704
000704
000704
0007{)4
000704
000704
000704
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
000793 SCANTRON CORPORATION
000793 SCANTRON CORPORATION
000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000375
000375'5
000375
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
000282 SOUTHERN CALIF. MUNICIP
SPAGNOLO, DON
00029-1 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
001972 STANLEY R, HOFFMAN ASSO
000752 STONE, JEFFREY E.
000752 STONE, JEFFREY E.
000303 SYSTEM 2/90
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO,
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO.
002104 TEMEKU GOLF COURSE
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
JUL/SEPT VECTOR CONTROL-
HAZ MAT PERMIT FOR CRC
TRAINING FOR K-9/POLICE DOG
OCT PROF SERVS/MALOBTT CORRIDO
OCT PROF SERVS/MALCOTT CORRIDO
REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
SCANTRON F~RMS/PUBLIC t~ORKS
CREDIT:OVERCHARGED FOR FORMS
SIERRA PROGRAMMING/ASSISTANCE
2-02-351-4946 ST LIGHT ELECT S
2-02-351-5281RANCHO VISTA A
2-02-351-5489/FRONT ST
2-02-351-6685 YNEZ RD PEO
2-02-351-rr90 RANCHO VISTA SPR
909 202-3800N~
909 202-3800 I~
909 202-4752 SN
DUES FOR:LA,JC,SJ,JV, JL,HP
REIMB:UNITED WAY RECOGNITION
REPAIR & MAINT CITY VEHICLES
FISCAL ANALYSIS STUDY
LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/31-24
LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/31-24
LETTERS FOR P.ZUNA NAME PLATE
BRONZE PLAQUE - VOORBURG PARK
TAX
CHAIRS & MISC SUPPLIES RENTAL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
001-170-999-5327
210-165-637-5802
210-165-637-5802
190-183-4982
100-164-601-5263
001-163-999-5263
001-165-999-5263
001-110-999-526S
001-162-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
001-170-999-5262
001-163-999-5222
001-163-999-5222
320-199-999-5250
190-181-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
100-16~-601-5240
191-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5226
001-150-999-5265
190-180-999-5214
001-161-502-5248
001-100-999-5258
001-1170
001-162-999-5220
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-5244
001-21T2
ITEM
AMOUNT
112.50
408.00
600.00
4,484.00-
4,~0.00
30.00
402.91
137.72
40.26
56.32
85.66
256.19
56.60
547.80
48.20-
317.53
724.87
5,359.14
116.89
15.95
17.60
197.72
139.25
94.36
150.00
76.00
20.99
494.91
30.50
3.00-
29.94
5 75. O0
~4.56
511.81
CHECK
AMOUNT
520.50
600.00
396.00
30.00
1,035.66 .
499.60
6,234.45
431.33
.150.00
76.00
20.99
494.91
27.50
29.94
619,56
51't-.41
VOUCHRE2
~95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26555
26556
26556
26556
26557
26558
26558
26558
26558
26558
26559
26559
26559
26559
26559
26559
26559
9
26559
26560
26561
26561
26562
26563
2656~
26565
26566
2656?
26568
26568
16:03
CHECK
DATE
11130/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
11/30/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000320
000320
000320
000826
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
001112
000524
000524
001209
001437
000339
000621
001601
001939
002092
002092
VENDOR
NAME
THOMAS, CHARLES E
TOt,/NE CENTER STATIONERS
TOI~NE CENTER STATIONERS
TOI4NE CENTER STATIONERS
TRAVEL TRUST
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REFUND:ELECT PERHIT B95-188~
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FY95-96
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIP
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIP
AIRFARE:STONE: R ROBERTS/NLC
U S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (ONRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RET]R
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNI
VAN TECH ENGINEERING, I
VAN TECH ENGINEERING, I
VAULT INC., THE
VIRACK, MARYANN
WEST PUBLISHING CC~PANY
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNC
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
WINDSOR PROJECTS, INC.
WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH
WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH
UNIFORM HAINT/PUBLZC t4ORKS
UNIFORMS FOR PUBLIC WORKS
UNIFORM NAINT/PUBLIC MORKS
UNIFORM NA]NT. FOR TCSD
UNIFORM PAINT. FOR TCSD
UNIFORM PAINT. FOR TCSD
FLOOR PATS RENTAL-CITY HALL
FLOOR PATS RENTAL-CITY HALL
FLOOR PAT RENTAL-CRC
FLOOR PAT RENTAL AND.CLEANING
FLOOR PAT RENTAL a SR CNTER
WEED IDENT BOOK FOR PRK MAINT
JACKET FOR CIP INSPECTOR
TAX
OFF-SITE STORAGE .FOR VAULT
T~SD INSTRUCTON EARNINGS
CA PUB CODES FOR CITY HALL
GOV'T MEMBERSHIP FOR FY 95'96
TRAFFIC FORECAST NODEL
DEC RENT/NOV CAM-CITY HALL
TOURISH FOLDER KIT
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-4285
001-163-999-5220
001-165-999-5220
001-165-999-5220
001-100-999-5258
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
193-2160
280-2160
100-164-601-5243
100-164-601-5243
100-164-601-5243
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
340-199-999-5250
340-199-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
190-180-999-5228
001-165-999-524Z
001-165-999-5242
330-199-999-5277
190:183-999-5330
001-120-999-5228
001-100-999-5226
100-164-603-5248
340-199-999-5234
280-199-999-5264
280-199-999-5264
ITEN
AMOUNT
24.00
33.73
48.37
42.59
248.00
358.92
75.90
334.82
47.88
66.68
24.00
25.08
24.00
32.78
19.85
19.85
35.50
35.50
38.40
38.40
25.62
71.50
69.95
5.42
368.11
112.00
46.83
8,500.00
800. O0
11,761.76
3,200.00
248.00
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
24.00
124.69
248.00
884.20
318.98
71.50
75.37
368.11
112.00
46.8~
8,500.00
800.00
11,761.76
3,~48.00
TOTAL CHECKS
157,275.56
VOUCNREZ PAGE__3
11/30/95 16:55
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CONt4UN]TY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP
320 INFORNATION SYSTENS
TOTAL
ANOUNT
66~,68&.68
8,403,52
31,831.58
815.58
18,669,33
20,817.18
25,215.87
32,747.97
803,187.71
VOU~CHRE2
'95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26571
26571
26571
26572
26573
26573
26574
26574
26574
26574
26574
26574
26574
26575
26576
26576
26578
26578
26579
26579
26580
26581
26581
26581
26582
26583
26584
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
16:55
CHECK
DATE
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95.
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000101,
000104
00010~
002093
000123
000123
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
001924
001056
001056
000520
001429
001429
000202
000202
002062
000217
000217
000217
001007
001713
000270
000406
000406
000406
0OO4O6
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
VENDOR
NAME
ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC.
ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC.
ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC,
BERRYNAN AND HENIGAR
BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
DAVID N. GR]FFITH & ASS
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
H D L COREN & CONE, INC
INACOR INFORMATION SYST
INACON INFORMATION SYST
J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES
J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES
JOHN EGAN & ASSOCIATES,
MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS
NARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS
MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS
N P G CORP.
NORRIS-REPKE, INC.
R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERS]DE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHER]FF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
]TEN
DESCRIPTION
ASPHALT FOR POT HOLE REPAIRS
FREIGHT
TAX
PROF SRVCS
LEGAL SERVICES RETAINER/SEPT
LEGAL SERVICES/SEPT
NOV LDSCP HAINT DUCK POND
NOV LDSCP NAINT PALA PARK
NCN LDSCP N/tINT - PARKS
NOV LDSCP NAINT SR CNTER
NOV LDSCP NAINT CRC
NOV LDSCP NAINT MEDIANS
NOV LDSCP NAINT N]COLAS RD PRK
SCHOOL MITIGATION FEE STUDY
NOV. LDSCP NA]NT-SLOPE AREAS
NOV LDSCP NAINT-R,C. SPT PRK
PROPERTY TAX CONSULTING SERVS.
COMPUTER SERVER/CITY HALL
TAX
OCT DESIGN SERVS-RANCHO PRK
CREDIT:PROF SRVCS SPORTS PARK
SEP/OCT WESTERN BYPASS ENG SER
ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIALS
VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
CREDIT:OVERCHARGED VOLLEYBALL
RIP RAP AND CONCRETE 1~3RK
OCT ENG SERVS-lst ST BRIDGE
DESIGN SRVCS/PARKVIEW SITE
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2
LAW ENFONCENENT ENDING AUG 2
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
280-2645
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-181-999-5415
190-182-999-5415
191-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
001-140-999-5248
193-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
001-140-999-5248
320-1970
320-1970
210-190-137-5802
210-190-137-5802
210-165-612-5802
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
100-164-601-5401
280-199-807-5802
210-190-138-5802
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5290
001-170~999-5291
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5281
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,556.80
50.00
120.65
3,915.00
3,150.00
2,145.28
1,445.00
2,336.00
13,547.61
242.52
1,670.81
815.58
1,015.00
2,997.91
18,669.33
7,605.64
4,800.00
30,486.00
2,261.97
3,662.18
2,522.00'
18,377.00
2,475.00
138.60
138.60'
3,361.00
21,300.87
1,300.00
207, 211.53
25,040.92
6,597.36
5,222.18
3,164.84
33,011. O0
9,643.53
16,170.93
17,961.35
PAGE
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,727.45
3,915.00
5,295.28
21,072.52
2,997.91
26,274.97
4,800.00
32,747.97
1,140.18
18,377.00
2,475.00
3,361.00
21,300.87
1,300.00
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2
11/30/95 16:55
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26585
26586
26587
CHECK
DATE
lZ/12/95
lZ/lZ/95
12/12/95
12112195
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
12/12/95
i2/12/95
12/12/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000/,06
000~.06
000~06
000406
000~06
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000~06
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
002021
002097
VENDOR
NAME
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERZFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFFS
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHER[FF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHER]FF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI
WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRZPTION
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2
BOOKING FEES/JUL 95
AUTO CR]ME/INFO SYSTM/1QTR 95
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT
OVRCNG FOR FACILITY FEES
OVRCHGED FACILITIES INV 10951
NOV RESTROOM NAINT SERVS/PRKS
HOT TAPE FOR STORM DRAINS
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-1230
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5273
001-170-999-5325
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5290
001-170-999-5291
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5281
001-12~0
001-170-999-52~
001-170-999-5234
001-170-999-5234
190-180-999-5250
100-164-601-5244
ZTEM
AMOUNT
5 222.17
10 674.47
8 832.00
9 038.30
18] 820.90
23 129.84
5 644.80
1.023.12
2 844.80
28 950.96
'9 603.20
12,375.39
22,033.87
1,023.12
9,057.13
2,660.78-
1,043.44-
1,494.00
3,315.07
CHECK
AMOUNT
651,593.49
1,494.00
3,315.07
803,18,..,
ITEM 3
TO:'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF C ..~,~
CITY MANAGER~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance
December 12, 1995
City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1995
PREPARED BY:
Steve Oakley, Accountant
RECOMMENDATION:
as of October 31, 1995.
That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and
receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646
and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code
Sections as of October 31, 1995.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of October 31,1995
2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of October 31,
1995
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of October 31, 1995
Cash Activity for the Month of October:
Cash and Investments as of October 1, 1995
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of October 31, 1995
$
$
54,984,916
2,394,228
(2,003,493)
55,375,651
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
Benefit Demand' Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Defined Contribution Fund
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs
Reserve Account-TCSD COPs
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
Construction Fund-RDA Bonds
Reserve Account-RDA Bonds
Institution Yield
City Hall
First Interstate
First Interstate
State Treasurer 5.784
ICMA
PEBSCO
PEBSCO
Bank of America 5.426
BOfA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.870
Bank of America 5.426
BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.210
BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 7.400
Balance
800
159,807
1,624
40,939,090
273,833
396,566
27,125
17,323
502,690
721,873
10,886,000
1,448,920
55,375,651
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount is nat of outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available
to meat budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next
thirty days.
City of Temecula
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
As of October 31,1995
Comrnunity
Services Redevelopment
City (1) District Agency
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 33,816,487 $ 1,659,887
Receivables 2,938,513 122,300
Due from other funds 551,944
Land held for resale 918, 171
Fixed assets*net 424,895
$ 19,899,277 $
200,681
2,165,~3
Total assets $ 38,650,010 $ 1,782,1 87 $ 22,265,011 $
Total
55,375,651
3,261,494
551,944
3,021,224
424,895
62,635,208
Liabilities and fund equity:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
$ 519,144 $ 32,800 $
6,399,785 $ 183,244 74,313
6,918,929 163,244 107,113
Fund equity:
Contributed capital 1,055,344
Retained earnings 111,200
Fund balances:
Reserved (2) 3,741,527 953,566
Designated (3) 18,462,656 663,623
Undesignated 8,360,974 (20,246)
Total fund equity
Total liabilities and fund equity
6,598,154
15,497,744
31,731,081 1,598,943 22,095,898
$ 38,650,010 $ 1,782,1 87 $ 22,265,011 $
551,944
6,657,342
7,209,286
1,055,344
111,200
11,293,247
34,625,465
8,340,728
55,425,922
62,635,208
(1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and deterred comp agency funds.
(2) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iow/mod homing,
and debt service.
(3) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations.
ITEM 4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Release Labor and Material Security in Parcel Map No. 22629
PREPARED BY:/~'-"Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
t~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of the Labor and Material portion of the security
for the improvement of streets and drainage in Parcel Map No. 22629, and DIRECT the City
Clerk to so notify the Developer.
BACKGROUND:
On October 22, 1992, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with:
Jack B. Koczarski
164 Lounsbury Road
Trumbull, CT 06611
for the improvement of street and drainage, and subdivision monumentation in Parcel Map No.
· 22629. Securities for these obligations were posted by lien agreement and a grant deed .was
granted to the .City for that purpose. The secured amounts were as follows:
Street and Drainage Improvements-Faithful Performance
Street and Drainage Improvements-Labor and Material
Subdivision Monumentation
$34,500
17,250
1,210
The grant deed was executed and delivered under the condition that it shall be null and void
upon the full and faithful performance of the terms and conditions of the Subdivision
Improvement Agreement. The deed covered both of the pertinent parcels prior to the
recordation of Parcel Map No. 22629, Parcel 3 and Lot "C" of Parcel Map No. 9197.
-1- r:\agdrpt\95\1212%pm22629.m&l
The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved
plans:
Street and drainage improvements within Parcel Map No. 22629
Survey Monuments within Parcel Map No. 22629
The Public Works Department recommended acceptance of the public improvements. On May
5, 1-995, the City Council accepted the improvements, initiated the one-year warranty
period, and authorized reduction in the Faithful Performance security amount to the ten-
percent (10%) warranty level as follows:
Street and drainage Improvements
$3,450
The Warranty period expires May 5, 1996, subject to any repairs/replacements required
to restore to public standards.
Staff examined the value of the parcels and analyzed release by reconveyance (quitclaim) to
the developer of several of the four subdivided parcels. The objective was to retain the
minimum number of parcels necessary to assure that the value of land the City holds is
sufficient to meet any claims against either the Faithful Performance warranty or Labor and
Materials security amount. On August 8, 1995, the City Council authorized the quitclaim of
three of the four parcels in Parcel Map 22629 to the developer, and thereby retained Parcel
2 as security for labor and material and faithful performance warranty purposes.
The developer was also required to post Labor end Material security to ensure payment to
suppliers and workers. This security is maintained in effect for a period of time determined by
the Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the public
improvements. No claims having been made for labor or materials and the lien period having
expired, Public Works Staff recommends release of this portion of the secured amount as
follows:
Labor and Materials
$17,250
The affected streets are not being accepted into the City maintained street system at this time.
The streets within the' subdivision are portions of Via Telesio and Green Tree Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Location Map
-2- r:~agdrpt\95t, 1212~pm22629.m&l
EXttlBIT "B"
PARCEL MAP NO. 22629
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tract No. 20848) (Southwesterly of Nicolas Road at Via Lobo)
PREPARED BY:/~/'Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
,~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-_,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACT NO. 20848)
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 20848 on August 18, 1987,
.and entered into subdivision agreements with Radnor/Sunland/Green Meadows Partnership for
street, water and sewer improvements. On March 7, 1990, the County of Riverside accepted
the improvements, reduced the faithful performance bonds for warranty purposes, and
initiated the warranty period. The City Council released. the Subdivision Monumentation bond
on December 11, 1990, the Labor and Material and Faithful Performance Warranty bonds on
August 25, 1992.
The public streets recommended for acceptance are Deer Meadow Road, Armore Court,
Tuolumne Court, Vidette Circle, Benwood Court, Donomore Court, Holden Circle, and portions
of Via Lobo, and North General Kearny ROad.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
r:\agdrpt~95\1212\tr20848m.sts
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INT0 THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACT NO. 20848)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted an offer of dedication of certain lots
for public road and public utility purposes made by Radnor/Sunland/Green Meadows
Partnership with the recordation of Tract Map No. 20848; and,
WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted the improvements within Tract No.
20848 as complete on March 7, 1990.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets
offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached
hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
r:~agdrpt~95\l 212~tr20848m.sts
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the
following vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt\95\ 1212~tr20848m.sts
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO.
Accepting the public streets offered to and
accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated
on Tract Map No. 20848, and accepting subject
public streets into the City Msintnined- Street
System as described below:
Those lots described as Lots was through "K" inclusive,
as shown on Tract Map No. 20848, f'ded 31 August 1987, in
Book 172 of Maps, Pgs 67-72 Incl., further described
as follows:
(Lots 'A" &
(Lot "C")
(Lot "D")
(Lot "E")
(Lot "F")
(Lot "G")
(Lot "H")
(Lots "I" & "J")
(Lot "K")
Portion of North General Kearny Road
Deer Meadow Road
Atmore Court
Tuolomne Court
Vidette Circle
Benw0od Court
Donomore Court
Holden Circle
Portion of Via Lobo
r:~agdrpt\95\l 212\tr20848m.sts
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-
STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
L
LEGEND
STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS
TO BE ACCEFFED I~TO CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
Y~lNrr_y MAp_,
"'~' hYS'f . /:z04 93
P4qT
/
/ ' / tlO'
/ ',~:,,.,'
·
1
: .
./
TR A C T A~. 2 0848
rl'EM 6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL RY~
CITY ATTORNEY
.. FINANCE DIREC
CITY OF TEMECL I~CITY MANAGE
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tracts No. 21674-3 and 21674-F). (Southwesterly of the
intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway)
PREPARED BY://4~ Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
/,~'Albert Ko Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95---
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACTS NO. 21674-3 AND 21674-F)
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved Tracts No. 21674-3and 21674oF on January 9, 1990, and entered
into Subdivision Agreements for construction of street, water and sewer improvements with
Mesa Homes (Now Kemper Real Estate Development Company).
Through previous City Council action the improvements for these two tracts have been
accepted and all improvement, warranty, and monumentation securities released.
The public streets now being accepted by this action are Corte Encinas and portions of Paseo
De Las Olas in Tract No. 21674-3, and Corte Salinas in Tract No. 21674-F. Portions of
Meadow Parkway in Tract No. 21674-3 will not be accepted until the work performed under
Assessment District No. 159 and Community Facilities District No. 88-3 are completed and
accepted by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 95-
with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
r:\agdrpt\95%1212\tr21674f.mst
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN
PUBLIC STREETS INTO ~ CITY MAINTAINEI)-STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 21674-3 AND 21674-F)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted offer of dedication of certain lots
for public road and public utility purposes made by Mesa Homes (Now Kernper Community
Development Company), with the recordation of Tract Maps No. 21674-3 and 21674-F;
and,
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tract No 21674-3
on April 26, 1994, and the improvements within Tract No. 21674-F on December 17, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those sweets or portions of
sweets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B"
attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
r:%egdrpt%95\1212~tr21674f.mst
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCILMENIBERS:
COUNCILNIF~MBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt\95X1212\tr21674f.mst
EXIIIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95.
Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the City
of Temecula as inflated on Tract Maps No. 21674-3 and
21674-F, and accepting subject public streets into the City
Maintained- Street System as described below:
A. Those lots described as Lots w A" through "C" inclusive, as
shown on Tract Map No. 21674-3, fled 12 January 1990, in
Book 211 of Maps, Pgs 95-98 Ind., further described as
follows:
Parkway
Las Olas
(Lot "A")*
(Lot "B")
(Lot
Portion of Meadows
Portion of Paseo De
Corte Encinas
B. That lot described as Lot 'A" as shown on Tract Map No.
21674-F, ~ed 12 January 1990, in Book 211 of Maps, Pgs 99-
102 Incl., further described as follows:
(Lot "A") Corte Salinas
*Not to be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System until the Acceptance of the
improvements constructed under Assessment District No. 159 and Comm-nity Facilities
District 88-3 is effected. ..
r:%egdrpt~95X 1212Xtr21674f.met
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED
STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
LEGEND
-T'EIE--=TS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS
TO BE ACCEPTED INTO CITY-
It'tA/NTAINED 5'I'R2ET SYS'I"EM
WCINITY MAP
NO ,SCALE
I'~'EM 7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Release the Monument Bond in Tract No. 21674-F. (Southwesterly of
intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway)
PREPARED BY: ~ Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City CounCil AUTHORIZE the release of the Subdivision Monument bond in Tract No
21674-F, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved the map for Tract Map No. 21674-F on January 12, 1990,' and
Subdivision Agreements and Securities were filed by:
Mesa Homes (Now Kemper Community Development Company)
27555 Ynez Road, Suite 202
Temecula, Ca 92591
.Through previous City Council action the improvements for this project have been accepted,
Faithful Performance, Labor and Material, and Warranty Bonds have been released.
The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been
completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of
the following Monumentation Bond:'
Bond No. 3S 687 488 00 in the amount of $11,500.
The affected street is Corte Salinas, which will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street
System by Resolution No. 95-
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
Location Map
-1- r:~agdtpt\95~1212\tr21674f. fin
VI[IAIITY M,4P
E l>,dNtltO C, ILIFOIIIh4 lOltO """'~' "'~"qo'
PEE P.M./if zlll4,, RM. 8. 144/z4 -.IJ (NEW Z..I;II · ' ~.,~,
$EO 3 ~ ~ 3 S a T e 9 fo ~L~- '
........... ~; ~ t~ JJ,~i~ ~l .. ~,, ~,/./,/-/-H- .~-. ',
"=~""'~""7,,~,,,, ,,,,, ,- ~"' ~",' ~
P~ ~ .Z& ~ 4 ~ 9 4 ~ ,,' ZZ4~ I ~ 74 37~N' / ~ '-
TRACT NO. 21674-F
Location Map
ITEM 8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
proposed Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets.
BACKGROUND:
Due to the current public interest in modifying or controlling traffic within residential
neighborhoods, staff has investigated implementing a comprehensive policy to ensure equity
and consistency in applying traffic calming strategies. Our research found a model policy that
could be adapted to meet the specific needs of the City of Temecula.
This model policy was first modified by the Department of Public Works prior to submittal to
the Police Department, Fire Department and City Attorney's office for input. All comments
were then incorporated and then presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for review
and comment. Their recommended changes were also incorporated and then approved. To
ensure that none of the Commission's refinements compromises the legality of this policy, the
City Attorney's office reviewed the proposed policy and re-confirmed their previous approval.
With the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and staff would like to submit this policy, Closure
or Modification of Traffic Flow for on Public Streets, for approval as a tool to handle
neighborhood traffic safety concerns.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Policy
Institute of Transportation Engineer (I.T.E.) Article -
Facing up to a Street Closure Epidemic
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda, Item 4 from
Meetings of August 25 and September 22, 1994
- 1 - r: Xagdrpt\95 \ 1212 ~stpoli~y. agn/aj p
CITY OF TEMECULA
POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR MODIFICATION
OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS
Traffic flow modifications covered by this policy include all "official traffic control devices"
authorized by the California Vehicle Code. Some of the methods authorized in particular
circumstances might include traffic islands, curbs, traffic barriers, or other roadway design
features, removing or relocation traffic signals and one-way traffic flow.
A petition request for the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets, including re-
opening previously closed streets, will be considered by the City for those streets meeting all
of the following criteria:
The street must be classified as a "local street" based on the City's Circulation
Element of the General Plan.
b. The street should be primarily residential in nature.
Traffic volumes on the street must equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles per day for a
complete closure. Volumes for a partial closure must equal or exceed 1,000 vehicles
per day.
de
Public Safety Agencies have not provided sufficient evidence of any major public
safety concerns regarding the proposed street closure or traffic flow modification.
An engineering safety study has determined that the proposed closure or traffic flow
modifications will not create unreasonable traffic on the subject street or on streets
which may be impacted by diverted traffic.
f. ' The changes in traffic flow will not result in unreasonable liability exposure for the
City.
g,
All persons signing a petition requesting a street closure or traffic flow modification
acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs
directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to
facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street
closure or traffic flow modifications.
h. The requested action is authorized by legislative authority in State law.
PETITION REOUIREMENTS
The following procedures must be followed for submitting a petition to the City:
- i - r. ~.ffm~!~olicy~la,ut~- 1 i/gS/ajp
The City Traffic Engineer will examine the technical feasibility and anticipated
impacts of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. This review will
include, but will not be limited to, items such as State law, the Circulation Element
of the City's General Plan, the type of road or street involved, compliance with
engineering regulations, existing traffic conditions, projected traffic conditions, the
potential for traffic diversion to adjacent streets, the increased liability exposure for
the City or conflicts with future planned improvements.
The City Traffic Engineer will determine the boundary of the "affected area" to be
petitioned. The affected area will include those properties where normal travel routes
are altered by the street closure or traffic flow modifications, and/or properties which
are significantly impacted by traffic that is to be diverted.
The petition requesting the street closure or traffic flow modifications must be
supported by a minimum of 85 percent of the total number of properties within the
"affected area.' Persons submitting petitions must attempt to contact all property
owners within the affected area to determine their views on the proposed street closure
or modifications in traffic flow. The City will not accept a petition unless the
petitioner offers confirmation in a form satisfactory to the City Traffic Engineer that
at least 95 percent of the property owners in the affected area have been contacted and
have either signed the petition in support of the street closure or traffic flow
modification or have signed a document indicating non-support for the street closure
or traffic flow modification.
d. At a minimum, petitions submitted to the City for review must include the following:
A statement that all persons signing the petition acknowledge it is the City's
policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the
street closure or traffic flow modifications in order to facilitate the funding of the
ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow
modifications.
A drawing showing the exact location of the proposed street closure or traffic
flow modifications and the boundary of the "affected area" must be provided.
The drawing must include changes in traffic patterns anticipated as result of the
proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications.
· The petition language must also clearly explain the location and nature of the
proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications.
The petition language and attached drawing must be reviewed and approved by
the City Traffic Engineer prior to circulation to ensure its accuracy and ability to
be clearly understood.
· A specific reference to the Vehicle Code section authorizing such street closure
or traffic flow modifications must be provided.
A sample petition has been provided as an attachment to this poiicy.
-2- r.~,/r~Mnolicy~hure-I lt95tajn
PETITION REVIEW PROCESS
The following process will be used to review all petitions associated with a.proposed street
closure or traffic flow modifications:
The City Traffic Engineer will review any petition to verify compliance with all
petition requirements set forth above, including whether the request in the petition is
authorized by State law. Any petition not complying with these requirements will not
be accepted for consideration.
If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, the proposed
street closure or traffic flow modifications will be referred to all affected public
agencies in conjunction with the environmental review process. When applicable,
these agencies will include all City Departments, the local office of the California
Highway Patrol, County Sheriff and Fire Departments, all affected local utility
companies, Temecula Valley Unified School District, Riverside Transit Agency, the
local office of California Department of Transportation and any other agencies
affected by the requested closure or traffic flow modification.
C,
If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, where the
street closure or traffic flow modifications on a street or system of streets may be
accomplished by several different methods, a public workshop will be held to which
all petitioners, affected property owners, and long-term tenants such as mobile home
park residents will be invited to participate after the petition requesting the traffic flow
modifications or street closure has been .-received and verified by the City. The
purpose of the workshop will be to attempt to determine the method that has the
greatest community support.
CITY ACTION ON STREET CLOSURE OR TRAFFIC FLOW MODIFICATION
REOUESTS
Once a petition contains all of the .required information and all of the matters described above
under "Petition .Review Process" have been completed, the City Traffic Engineer will prepare
a report with recommendations and initiate and complete the environmental review process for
the project. Project alternatives to the extent required will be defined for a temporary or
permanent street closure or traffic flow modifications. The City of Temecula, Public/Traffic
Safety Commission will review the street closure or traffic flow modifications request, any
environmental review document prepared for the project, all public agency referral responses
received during the environmental review process, and the results of the technical staff review.
The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission may support or recommend against the
street closure or traffic flow modifications. If the Public/Traffic Safety Commission denies the
proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications, that action will be final unless within ten
days from the date of the City Traffic Engineer's notification of the Commission's decision to
all property owners within the affected area, a property owner within the affected area appeals
the Commission's decision to the City Council. In order to appeal the decision. the property
owner shall file a written notice of appeal with the Department of Public Works. The appeal
will be heard in accordance with the Appeal Process listed below. If the request is
recommended for further consideration, after public notice is given, the City Council may, after
-3- r: ~affic~policy ~stclomaw- 11/9.~/ajp
making any necessary findings, establish a temporary or permanent period of street closure or
traffic flow modifications.
When the City Council considers a recommendation of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
or an appeal of a decision of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission with respect to a proposed
street closure or traffic flow modifications, it will follow the process outlined below:
A letter explaining the street closure or traffic flow modifications and the time and
place when the matter will be heard by the City Council will be sent to all property
owners, within the affected area prior to its installation.
All approaches to the proposed closure or modification will be posted notifying
motorists of upcoming Public Hearing.
A Public Hearing will be set before the City Council and public notice will be given
at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing by letter to property owners' in the affected
area and by posting of signs on the affected roadways as described in this Section and
by a notice published in the newspaper.
Public notification of the City Council action will be given in cases when a street
closure or traffic modifications is approved by the City Council, and signs giving
notice of the street closure or traffic flow modifications will also be erected at least
two weeks prior. to the date of implementation of the street closure or traffic
modifications.
In the event the action involves a highway not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the
City of Temecula, the City will obtain the proper approvals from the California
Transportation Commission pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21101 or
21100 (d) prior to implementation of the street closure or traffic flow modification.
fe
A letter explaining the final City Council decision will be sent by the City to all
property owners, within the affected area.
The City Council has the sole discretion, subject to all applicable laws, to approve, modify,
continue or deny any street closure or traffic flow modifications request regardless of any
support or-lack thereof via the petition process. Any action by the City Council to approve or
deny a street closure or traffic flow .modifications request will be by adoption of a formal
resolution.
..4- r: \Indr~c~olk~y~l~losure- 11/95tajp
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PETITION TO CLOSE OR MODIFY THE TRAFFIC FLOW ON STREET
BETWEEN AND
BY THE INSTALLATION OF {Nature of Chan~,es)
AT (Location)
DATE:
BEFORE YOU SIGN THIS PETITION, UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SIGNING! IT IS
RECOMMENDED THAT YOU FIRST READ THE CITY'S POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR
MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS.
We, the undersigned resident of the area shown on the attached map do/do not petition the City of
Temecula to on Street as
shown on the attached drawing.
All persons signing this petition acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in
all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to facilitate the
funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modification.
The specific California Vehicle Code section(s) authorizing such closure or traffic flow modifications
states:
All persons signing this petition do hereby certify that they reside within the area impacted by the
proposed traffic flow change as shown on the attached map.
Our designated contact person is:
Phone:
Signature Print Name Print Address
-5- r:. Utaff'gM~olicyXs~losu~- 11/951sip
RULES AND REGULATIONS: SUBJECT MATTER
VEHICLE CODE SECTiON
21100. Local authorities may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution regarding the
following matters:
a. Regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages on the highways.
Licensing and regulating the operation of vehicles for hire and drivers of passenger vehicles
for hire.
c. Regulating traffic by means of traffic officers.
Regulating traffic by means of official traffic control devices meeting the requirements of
Section 21400.
Regulating traffic by means of any person given temporary or permanent appointment for such
duty by the local authority whenever official traffic control devices are disabled or otherwise
inoperable, at the scenes of accidents or disasters, or at such locations as may require traffic
direction for orderly traffic flow.
No person shall, however, be appointed pursuant to this subdivision unless and until the local
authority has submitted to the commissioner or to the chief law enforcement officer exercising jurisdiction
in the enforcement of traffic laws within the area in which such person is to perform such duty, for
review, a proposed program of instruction for the training of a person for such duty, and unless and until
the commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer approves the proposed program. The
commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer shall approve such a proposed program if he
reasonably determines that the program will provide sufficient training for persons assigned to perform
the duty described in this subdivision.
f,
Regulating traffic at the site of road or street construction or maintenance by persons
authorized for such duty by the local authority.
g,
Licensing and regulating the operation of tow truck service or tow truck drivers whose
principal place of business or employment is within the jurisdiction of the local authority,
excepting the operation and operator of any auto dismantler's tow vehicle licensed under
Section 11505 or any tow truck operated by a repossessing agency licensed under Chapter 11
(commencing with Section 7500) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code and its
registered employees. Nothing in this subdivision shall limit the authority of a city or city and
- county pursuant to Section 12111.
Operation of bicycles, and, as specified in Section 21114.5, electric carts by physically
disabled persons, or persons 50 years of age or older, on the public sidewalks.
Providing for the appointment of nonstudent school crossing guards for the protection of
persons who are crossing a street or highway in the vicinity of a school or while returning
thereafter to a place of safety.
-6- r:.~tff'tc~elicy~b:lomar~l !/9511~jp
Regulating the methods of deposit of garbage and refuse in streets and highways for collection
by the local authority or by any person authorized by the local authority.
Regulating cruising. The ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall
regulated cruising, which shall be defined as the repetitive driving of a motor vehicle past a
traffic control point, in traffic which is congested at or near the traffic control point, as
determined by the ranking peace officer on duty within the affected area, within a specified
time period and after the vehicle operator has been given an adequate written notice that
further driving past the control point will be a violation of the ordinance or resolution. No
person is in violation of an ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision unless
(1) that person has been given the written notice on a previous driving trip past the control
point and then again passes the control point in that same time interval and (2) the beginning
and end of the portion of the street subject to cruising controls are clearly identified by signs
that briefly and clearly state the appropriate provisions of this subdivision and the local
ordinance or resolution on cruising.
Regulating or authorizing the removal by peace officers of vehicles unlawfully parked in a fire
lane, as described in Section 22500.1, on private property. Any removal pursuant to this
subdivision shall be consistent to the extent possible with the procedures for removal and
storage set forth in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 22650).
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES: UNIFORM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
VEHICLE CODE SECTION
21100. I Whenever any city or county, by ordinance or resolution, permits, restricts, or prohibits
the use of public or private highways pursuant to this article, any traffic control device erected by it on
or after January 1, 1981, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications adopted by the
Depati~nent of Transportation pursuant to Section 21400.
REGULATION OF HIGHWAYS
VEHICLE CODE SECTION
21101. Local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and
regulations by ordinance or resolution on the following matters:
a,
Closing any highway to vehicular traffic when, in the opinion of the legislative body having
jurisdiction, the highway is no longer needed for vehicular traffic.
b,
Designating any highway as a through highway and requiring that all vehicles observe official
traffic control devices before entering or crossing the highway or designating any intersection
as a stop intersection and requiring all vehicles to stop at one or more entrances to the
intersection.
C,
Prohibiting the use of particular highways by certain vehicles, except as otherwise provided
by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 1031) of
Chapter 5 of Pan 1 of Division 1 of Public Utilities Code. No ordinance which is adopted
pursuant to this subdivision after November 10, 1969, shall apply to~any state highway which
is included in the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, except an ordinance
which has been approved by the California Transportation Commission by a four-fifths vote.
-7- r. Xu~f'gXpolicy~:lo.uf~-ll/95/ajp
Closing particular streets during regular school hours for the purpose of conducting
automobile driver training programs in the secondary schools and colleges of this state.
e,
Temporarily closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and
other purposes when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is
necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street
during the temporary closing.
Prohibiting entry to, or exit from, or both, from any street by means of islands, curbs, traffic
barriers, or other roadway design features to implement the circulation element of a general
plan adopted pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 65350) of Chapter 3 of Division
1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. The rules and regulations authorized by this
subdivision shall be consistent with the responsibility of local government to provide for the
health and safety of its citizens.
LOCAL AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY CLOSE HIGHWAY: CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
VEHICLE CODE SECTION
21101.4 (a) A local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, adopt rules and regulations for
temporarily closing to through traffic a highway under its jurisdiction when all of the following conditions
are, after a public hearing, found to exist.
The local authority finds and determines th'at there is serious and continual criminal activity
in the portion of the highway recommended for temporary closure. This finding and
determination shall be based upon the recommendation of the police department or, in the case
of a highway in an unincorporated area, on the joint recommendation of the sheriffs
department and the Department of the California Highway Patrol.
2. The highway has not been designated as a through highway or arterial street.
3. Vehicular or pedestrian traffic on the highway contributes to the criminal activity.
The closure will not substantially adversely affect the operation of emergency vehicles, the
performance of municipal or public utility services, or the delivery of freight by commercial
vehicles in the area of the highway proposed to be temporarily closed.
(b)
A highway may be temporarily closed pursuant to subdivision (a) for not more than 18 months,
except that period may, pursuant to subdivision (a), be extended for one additional period of not
more than 18 months.
Facing Up to a Street
Closure Epidemic
BY R. MARSHALL ELIZER JR. AND NAZIR LALANI
s major street networks in urban-
Aized areas become more congested
and traffic seeks alternative routes,
]ocal agencies throughout the United
States are facing street closure requests
by their residents. Local residential
streets with back-out driveways that
were intended to carry. a few hundred
vehicles per day are now frequently car-
ry. ing in excess of several thousand vehi-
cles per day. Agencies are being asked
to either close these streets to through
traffic in order to improve residents'
safety and quality of life, or to restrict
the traffic flow bv installation of medi-
ans and other barriers. Street closures
are also being generated in parts of
California bv the desire to limit high-
volume vehicular access to streets adja-
cent to schools for security and safety
reasons. Increasing crime rates have
triggered moves by cities in Southern,
California to,close streets to reduce
gang and drug-related activities from
being conducted in residential neigh-
borhoods.
One, example of this growing prob-
lem was recently played out in the City
of San Buenaventura. The City Council'
decided to close Poll Street (Figure 1 ). a
collector street that bisects Ventura
High School's campus. but carnes 9.500
vehicles a day. Currently the high
school staff place barricades a,cross the
street and close it to traffic between
7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. This closure was
enacted by the City Council in response
to demands from school administrators
that something be done to curb the
potential for gang violence and drive-by
24 · ITE JOURNAL * OCTOBER 1994
Fi~re 1. Poll Street dosed Io traffic tbro~b Veatura Hi~b 5¢beol ¢amp~ belween
7:38 =.~, smi 4'~ p,m,
shoorings. To prevent traffic using par-
allel. narrow residential streets to cir-
cumvent the closure. barricades (Figure
2) are placed across two residential
streets during the time that Poll Street
is closed to traffic. Figure 3 shows the
location of all three street closures. This
action has been strongly resented l~y the
area residents and has resulted in fie-
quenf. long and heated City Council
meetings with little opportunity for
compromise.
The decision to close a public street
to through traffic. even if a local street.
is an important and often controversial
public policy. decision. Even if adjacent
residents are solidly in favor of such a
street closure or modification of traffic
flow. motorists from outside' the imme-
diate area who are impacted will often
vehemently oppose the removal of this
"public" facihty. There are also impor-
tant traffic engineenng and safety. con--
siderations to be determined. such as if
problems actually exist {volume. speed.
accidents) to warrant the closure. Othe.'
considerations are:
· Will the diverted traffic create similar
problems or request on other streets?
· How will the proposed changes in
traffic flow affect the ability of police.
fire, and ambulance services to access
the immediate and surrounding neigh-
borhoods?
· Are there other less reatncti vs
to address the residents' concern,
· How and where should the street do-
sure or traffic flow modification take
place, and who will pay for and main-
rain the installation?
In order for local agencies to effec-
tively address requests for street clo-
sures or traffic flow modifications, com-
prehensive policies should be devel-
oped in order to determine how such
requests are going to be evaluated and
decisions made. When there is not a
documented need and solid consensus
among area residents on the need for
closure, efforts by local agencies to
close streets or modify traffic flow can
often lead to divisive neighborhood
debates that require vast amounts of
staff time and result in heated no-win
heanngs in front of elected officials. For
~nat reason, the City of San
Buenaventura drafted a poilcy1 that is
designed to provide a comprehensive
process whereby street closure and traf-
fic flow modification requests can be
properly evaluated and decision made.
The clty's recently adopted policy was
based on a street closure policy that was
adopted by the City of Lakewood,
Colorado, in 1985.2 To a~sist other local
agencies who might be 'attempting ~o
~ddress similar problem in their own
communities, the City of Buenaventura
has provided a summary of what they
believe to be the essential elements a
typical policy of this type should con-
tain.
Purpose of Policy
It should be the general policy of all
agencies to not allow temporary or per-
manent closure of any.. public street to
vehicular traffic. Requests for closure or
modification of traffic flow on a public
street may be considered, however,
based on a petition that meets all the
criteria and procedures outlined herein.
Agencies should carefully review each
street closure or traffxc flow modifica-
tion request to ensure that the proposed
location and attending circumstances
me,-~ all the criteria outlined in this pol-
i~- and in relevant state lawi. The pur-
pose of a street closure or traffic flow
modification policy should be to set
forth the process and criteria by which
modification of traffic flow or closure of
Public streets may be considered by the
agencies' staff and elected officials, and
to identify the conditions under which
closures or modifications may be enact-
ed. This policy should only apply to the
closure or modification of traffic flow
on public streets initiated by citizens.
The policy should not apply to closur~
or modifications initiated by a local
agency to address specific traffic safety
issues or to comply with state and feder-
al standards and warrants. The policy
also should not apply to temporary
changes in traffic that are needed to
stage construction/maintenance activi-
ties or special events.
NEVER-FAIL
LOOP
SYSTE
Troffic Flow Moc!fficofions C) K ~~,,E J
Covered by Policy ~
Traffc flow modifications covered -- ·
d
by a.y propnse poUcy she,d prefer- LOOP
ably include, at a miramum, typical gee- :
meu'ic duiSn features and ofSciai raf-
fic control devices authorized by the
state vehicle code. Some of the methods
authorized by the policy might include
traffic islands, curbs, traffic
barriers/diverters, or other roadway
design featu.r. es; and removing or rein-
eating traffic siEnais or stop signs and
one-way traffic flow.
Cfiterjo:
A petition request f~r the closure or
modification of traffic flow on public
streets, including reopening previously
closed streets, should only be consid-
ered by local agencies for those streets
meeting all of the following criteria:
1. The street should be classified as a
"local street" on th~ agency's officially
adopted Circulation Plan.
: Z The street should be primarily res-
idential in nature,
3. Traffic volumes on the street
should equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles
per day for a complete closure.
Volumes for a partial closure should
equal or exceed 1,000 vehicles per day.
4. There is not sufficient evidence of
any major emergency response or pub-
lic safety concerns regarding the pro- ·
po~ed closure or modifications.
5. An engineering and safety study
has determined that the proposed
sure or modifications will not create
unacceptable traffic conditions on the
subject street or on streets that may be
impacted by diverted traffic
6. The changes in traffic flow will not
result in unreasonable liability exposure
for the agency as determined by engi-
~UAP,~
TECHNOLOGY
BUILT
LONG OUADRAPOL~
FEA 3;URES
ASPHALT-RUBBER FILLED
POL YPROPYLENE CONSTRUCTION.
~BLE/FOLDABLE EXPANSION
CONTRACTION JOINTS. ~
LOOPS IN EXCESS OF 100 FT.
EASILY HANDLED.
HERME'TIC ASSEMBLIES - 4t LAYERS
OF MOISTURE PROTECTION.
RESISTANC; TO GROUND-TY3e!CALLY
OFT SCALE.
O-STABILIZED QUAUTY OF LOOP
DOES NOT FALL OFT WITH TIME.
USER REFERENCES AVAILABLE
NEVE -FAIL
LOOP SYSTEMS
6021 S.W. 48TH AVE.
PORTLAND OR 97221
( 503 ) 244-6345
ITE JQURNAL · OCTOBER 1994 · 25
neering staff in conjunction with the
local agency's attorneys.
7. All those signing a petition
.requesting a street closure or traffic
flow modification acknowledge it is the
agency's policy that they may be
required to participate in all costs
directly associated with the street clo-
sure or traffic flow modification in
order to facilitate the funding of the
ultimate improvements needed to
implement the closure or modifications.
8. The requested action is authorized
by legislative authority in state and
local laws.
Review of State Law
Most states preempt the field of traf-
fic control, and local authority is
allowed to enact or enforce any ordi-
nance on the matters covered by the
state's vehicle code unless expressly
authorized bv statute. Also it is usually
most states' policy. that all people have
an equal right to use the streets and
highways, and localities have no carte
blanche and, absent express authority,
may not determine which traffic shall or
shall not use streets. Based upon this
policy, in the absence of specific state
legislative authority to the contrary, an
agency may~ not be able to restrict the
right to travel upon one of its streets to
its residents or to other exempted dri-
vers. Some examples in the California
Vehicle Code of such specific authontv
to regulate travel upon streets are: if th~
agency. 's elected officials determine the
street is no longer needed for vehicular
traffic [21101 (a)]; if the street is needed
to implement the agency's officially
adopted cirnlation plan [21101(0]; and
if the street divides school Founds and
protection of students is a consideration
[211(Y2]. When a !ocal agency decides to
utilize the express delegation of such
authority, it may only utilize geometric
design features or 'official traffic con-
trol devices" authorized by the vehicle
code. All requests for street closures or
traffic flow modifications should be
reviewed by local agencies for confor-
mdace with state and local laws
I:~flfion Requirements
The following procedures should be
· followed for submitting petitions:
1. The agency's traffic or transporta-
tion engineer should examine the tech-
nical feasibility and anticipate impacts
of the proposed street closure or traffic
flow modification. This review should
include, but not be limited to, items
such as state law, the agency's officially
adopted circulation plan. the type of
road or street involved. compliance
with engineering regulations. existing
traffic conditions, projected traffic con-
ditions, the potential for traffic diver-
sion to adjacent streets, the increased
liability exposure for the city, or con-
flicts with future planned improve-
meats.
2. The agency's traffic or transporta-
tion engineer should determine the
boundary. of the "affected area" to be
26 · ITE JOURNAL · OCTOBER 1994
petitioned. The affected area i~cludes,
but is not limited to, those proper-~s
where normal travel routes to an
the affected area are to be alte~
the street closure or traffic flow modi~-
cations, and/or properties that are sig-
nificantly impacted by traffic to be
diverted.
3. The petition should be supported
by a minimum of 80 percent of the total
citizens affected by the proposed
changes in traffic flow, as determined
by the agency. Affected citizens are
defined as property owners, tenants,
business owners, and long-term tenants
(such as mobile home park residents)
within the affected area who might be
significantly affected by the proposed
modifications or closure. People sub-
mining petitions must attempt to con-
tact all affected parties. At a minimum,
95 percent of all those affected who
may need to use the street(s) on a daily
basis must be contacted for the petition
to be accepted by the agency. This
requirement is satisfied by signatures
from 95 percent of the affected parties
indicating support or non-support for
the changes.
4. At a minimum. the petition sDl~
mired to the agency for review sl'
include the following:
--A statement that all those signing the
petition acknowledge it is the agency's
policy that they may be required to par-
ticipate in all costs directly associated
with the street closure or traffic flow
modifications in order to facilitate the
funding of the ultimate improvements
needed to implement the closure or
modifications,
--A drawing showing the exact location
of the proposed street closure or traffic
flow modifications and the boundary of
the area in which traffic could potential-
ly be affected. The drawing should
include changes in traffic patterns antic-
ipated as a result of the proposed street
closure or traffic flow modifications.
--A clear explanation of the location
and nature of the proposed closure or
modifications,
--Approval of the petition language
and attached drawing by the agency's
traffic or transportation engineer to
ensure its accuracy and ability to be
clearly understoocL
--A specific reference to the vehicl~
c0de3 section authorizing such sr
closure or traffic flow modificati,
from the local agency.
Petition Review Process
The following process should be
used to review all peruions associated
with a proposed street closure or traffic
flow modifications:
1. The agency's traffic or trausporm-
lion engineer should review any peti-
.lion to verify compliance with all peti-
tion requirements set for, h above. Any
petition not complying with these
requirements should not be accepted
for consideration.
2. If the petition contains all of the
required information under the
agency's adopted policy, the local
agency should send a letter to affected
citizens who signed the petition. The
purpose of the letter is to obtain verifi-
cation of support or opposition to the
proposed closure or modifications ~om
each person who signed the initial peti-
lion.
3. If the petition contains all of the
required in/ormation under this policy,
the proposed closure or modifications
should be referred to all affected public
agencies in conjunction with the envi-
ronmental review process. At a mini-
mum, these agencies should include all
the agency's own departments, all
affected local utili~ companies, school
districts, emergency response proriders
,and transit agencies. They should also
include the local office of the highway
patrol, the. 'local office of the state
Department of Transportation, and any
other agencies that have authority over
the streets affected by the requested
closure or traffic flow modification.
Where the closure or modifications
on a street or s.vstem of streets may be
accomplished by several different meth-
ods. a public workshop should be held,
and affected citizens invited to partici-
pate. The purpose of the workshop is
to attempt to determine the method
that has the greatest community sup-
port prior to circulation of the petition.
plete the enviwnmental review process
for the project. To the extent required,
project alternatives should be defined
for a temporary or permanent street
closure or traffic flow modification.
Where they exist, the agency's traffic or
transportation committee should review
the closure or modifications request,
any environmental review document
prepared for the project, all public
agency referral responses received dur-
ing the environmental review process,
and the results of the technical staff
review. The traffic or transportation
committee should be requested to
either support or Fecommend against
the street closure or traffic flow modifi-
cations. If the committee recommends
against the closure or modifications,
that action should be final and the
agency's engineer should notify all peti-
riohers. If the request is recommended
for further consideration, the ageney's
elected officials may, after public notice
is given and after making any necessary
findings, establish a temporary or per-
maneat period of street closure or traf-
~c flow modifications.
When co. ntemplating a potential
street closure or traffic flow m0difica-
lions, the agency should typically follow
the process outlined below-.
1, A letter explaining the street clo-
sure or traffic flow modifications and
the time and place when the matter is
to be heard by the agency's elected
officials should be sent to all petition-
era, property owners, tenants, and
businesses within the affected area
prior to its installation.
2, A public hearing should be set
before the public notice is given.
3. Public notification of the
agency's official action should be
given in cases when a closure or modi-
fication is approved by a majority of
the elected officials, and signs giving
notice of the closure or modifications
should also be erected at least two -
weeks prior to the date of implementa-
lion.
4, A letter explaining the final deci-
lion of the agency should be sent to all
affected c/tizens.
The officially adopted poficy should
contain language that clearly states that
NEW DENOMINATOR
Agency Action on Street
Closure or Traffic Flow
Modfficcdion Requests
16unilsononelo0tlQuare
#
Once a petition contains all of the
required information and the petition
review process has been completed, the
agency's traffic or transportation engi-
neer should prepare a report with rec-
ommendations, and initiate and- corn-
TRAFFIC COUNTERS AND TALLY BOARDS
of keys, aflottincJ N ightmst actuating
· Rugged:karl yet I~Mwe~M
· t 'qquer, a~ moorote boems--maor
maclehxyourc=unttngneecl8
· Woftc in 811 kind8 of westher
· Alxolutm accuracy
· Writ8 fly ixochure anti IMce lilt
Slewtgllmsewe~)a~nim 1114
THE DENOMINATOR CO., INCq WOODBURY, CT 06798
(203) 263'3210
ITE JOURNAL · OCTOBER !~4 · 27
FiFe 3. london of Poll Street doere tad two parallel residential streets.
the agency has the sole discretion, sub-
jea to all applicable laws, to approve,
modify, continue, or deny any street
closure or traffic flow modification
request regardless of any support or
lack of support via the petition process.
Any official action by the agency to
approve or deny a closure or modifica-
tion request should be by adoption of a
formal resolution.
ATI~. Cotash: Volume, Speed, Ow. Axle, (aap, Headway,
Event-Logging, Presence Tim, Occupancy ......
)l',,wn,i Ca: Turning Movement, Class, O&D Studies,
Parking Counts, Pedestrian Counts ..................
W'eJ~-Iu-]l[odoa; Axle Weight, TotsJ Weight, Number of Axles,
Class, Speed, V'mlaaans ..................................
(Temporary & Perrnmqent inmallaaons)
1~-o~: Traffic Counters {Sales & Rentals),
WIM Equipment. Tc,;~orary Road Loops
Services Hsroughout
For 'a quote ca/l us a~: Tel/Fax (416)890-1430
50 RineshridSe Carden Circle, Ssdte 804
]H'Isstasau&'a, Ontario, Canada IaSR 1Y2
28 · ITE JOURNAL · OCTOBER 1~74
Citizen Information
Brochure
The City of San Buenaventu;
developed an informational brochux,. ,o
explain the city's Traffic Flow
Modification Policy to citizens. This is
part of the city's series of informauonal
brochures on traffic engineering issues
such as speed limits, crosswalks, traffic
signal stops, parking, }eft turn phasing,
and school zone safety. Anyone wishing
to obtain copies of brochures should send
a written request including a mailing
address to: Nazir Lalani, P.O. Box
Ventura, CA 93003. Fax 805/648-1809.
References
1. City Council of the City of San
Buenaventura, California, Policy of the
City of San Buenavenlura Relanve W
Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow
on Public Streets (1993), Resolution 93-
130.
2. City of Lakewood, Colorado, A
Resolution EstablBtzmg a Policy for Street
Closures in the City of Lakewood,
Colorado (1985), Resolution 85-]81.
3. Vehicle Code, State of California, (1993).
I
R. Mars
Eiizer Jr,, P.E., .,
director of Public
Works and
k Transportation for
/. the C~y of Modesw,
Calif He war previ-
ously director of transportation for the
city of Arlington, Texas. Elizer holds a
B.S.C.E. and an M.S.C.E. from the
University of Tennessee. He ix a past
president of the Colorado/Wyoming
Section and past secretary-treasurer of
the Texas Section. He is the current
International Vice President, 1995
President Elec~ and a Fellow of ITE.
: ~' Nazir Lalani,
' '~ ~ P.E., is city trans-
~,~" portation engineer
' - with San Buenaven-
tufa, Calif. He
holds a B.S. Chem.
E. from the Univer-
sity of Exeter and an M.S.C.E. from
Arizona State University at Tempe.
Lalani was president of District 6 ~
1989-90, is a current Board Membe,
· District 6 and a Fellow of the institute.
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Public/Traffic Safety CommiSsion
FROM:
Marry Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:
August 25, 1994
SUBJECT:
Item 4
City of Temecula - Street Closure or Modification Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and comment on the draft Street Closure
or Modification Policy.
BACKGROUND:
Due to requests to have the Department of Public Works close or modify public streets, the
Traffic Division proposes to create a policy to guide public officials in order to ensure solutions
that are equatable for the entire community.
The State of California has preempted the field of traffic control (refer to Section 21 of the
California Vehicle Code), and no local authority is allowed to enact or enforce any ordinance
on the matters covered by the Vehicle Code unless expressly authorized by statute.
It is the policy of the State that all persons have an equal right to use the streets and
highways, and localities have no carte blanche and, absent express authority, may not
determine which traffic shall and which shall not use streets. Based upon this policy, in the
absence of specific State legislative authority to the contrary, a city may not restrict the right
to travel upon one of its streets to its residents or to other exempted drivers. Some examples
in the Vehicle Code of such specific authority to regulate travel upon streets are: if the City
Council determines the street is no longer needed for vehicular traffic [§21101 (a)]; if needed
to implement the Circulation Element of a General Plan [§21101 (f)]; if due to criminal activity
[§21101.4]; regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages [§(a)]; and on streets
dividing school grounds to protect students attending such school or school grounds. When
a local agency decides to utilize the express delegation of such authority, the local agency
may only utilize "office traffic control devices" authorized by the Vehicle Code. Additional,
local authorities may not place gates or other selective devices on any street which deny or
restrict the access of certain members of the public to the street, while permitting others
unrestricted access to the street.
PURPOSE OF POLICY
Consistent with State law and policy, it is the general policy of the City to not allow temporary
or permanent closure of any public street to vehicular traffic. Requests for closure or
modification of traffic flow on a public street will be considered, however, based on a petition
which meets all the criteria and procedures outlined in the attached. policy. The City will
carefully review each street closure or traffic flow modification request to ensure that the
proposed location and attending circumstances meet all the criteria outlined in our policy and
in State law described above. The purpose of this policy is to set forth the process and
f':%trdfk~%iBcndm\~&4%O82,~le, iP
criteria by which modification of traffic flow or closure of public streets may be considered by
the City Council and to identify the conditions under which closures or modifications may be
enacted. This policy only applies to the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets
initiated by citizens. This policy will not apply to the closure or modification of traffic flow on
public streets initiated by the City to address specific traffic safety issues or to comply with
State and Federal standards and warrants. This policy also will not apply to temporary
changes in traffic that are needed to stage special events in the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
1. Draft Street Closure or Modification Policy
2. Appendix "A"
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM:
Many Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:
September 22, 1994
SUBJECT:
Item 4
Street Closure/Modification Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the attached "City of
Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets".
BACKGROUND:
This policy was previously presented to the Commission in draft form for review and comment. A few
items were discussed and requested to be incorporated into a final draft to be brought back for
Commission approval. The Traffic Division recommended that specific wording changes be submitted
prior to September 13, 1994 for incorporation, providing staff with clear direction. Commissioner
Guerriero was contacted to solicit input since he was absent from the Commission meeting of August 25,
1994.
The attached document, "City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public
Streets", identifies staffs effort to include all items discussed at our meeting because no written changes
were received.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets
r:Xltalf~\~::ommlamaXa~=nda\~M\O922/ajp
ITEM 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC
CITY MANAGER~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph ICicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Western Bypass Assessment District 95-1
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR INTENTION TO MAKE ACQUISITIONS AND
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WESTERN BYPASS ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 95-1
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT
AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO
BACKGROUND:
The Western Bypass, a roadway between the interchange at I-15 at State Route 79 South and
the City of Murrieta is part of the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the Cities of
Temecula as well as Murrieta.
The current proposal is to construct a portion of the Western Bypass. The portion to be
constructed consists of the following:
Construction of four (4) lanes divided roadway from I-15/79(S)Interchange for a
distance of approximately 5,600 feet northerly.
Extension southerly of Vincent Moraga Drive from its present southerly terminus to join
the Western Bypass roadway. Vincent Moraga shall be a four (4) lane roadway.
Roadway grading from the above intersection of Western Bypass and Vincent Moraga,
northerly to Rancho California Road to provide for future overcrossing at Rancho
California Road.
r.\agdrpt\95%1212%asf195-1 .reelnip
The proposed project is being funded by an Assessment District, through assessments of
benefiting properties (Assessment District 95-1 ).
The boundaries of the Assessment District are shown on the attached boundary map. The
parcels within those boundaries are being assessed in accordance with the benefit received
by each of the parcels. It should be noted that certain parcels within the Old Town, west of
Murrieta Creek do receive benefit from the proposed construction. These parcels are also
within the boundary of Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and provide low-moderate housing
for the residents of Temecula. The assessments on the parcels within the Old Town, west
of Murrieta Creek, was computed on the basis of benefit received. The total amount of
assessment against those properties is $395,892. The staff is recommending that the above
amount be considered as contribution from the Redevelopment Agency to Assessment District
No. 95-1. This contribution would recognize the Redevelopment Agency's economic
development efforts within the Old Town Specific Plan area.
It should also be noted that the plans and specifications for the project are still in the
preparation stage, and therefore the total project cost estimates ($14,816,757)are necessarily
on the high side. After completion of the plans and specifications, staff will request
authorization to go to bid on the project.
After receiving the bids, contract award will be recommended to the lowest responsible bidder,
and the assessment will be adjusted to reflect the actual bid rather than the estimate currently
used.
It should be noted that the assessments can not be increased from the amount shown on the
preliminary notice of assessment without the consent of the property owners or starting the
proceedings all over with new resolutions being adopted and new notices being sent out.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Contribution from the Redevelopment Agency in the amount of $395,892.
Attachment:
Resolution No. 95- A Resolution of Intention to Make Acquisitions and
Improvements Western Bypass Assessment District No. 95-1
Resolution No. 95-~ - A Resolution of Preliminarily Approving Engineers Report
Western Bypass Assessment District No. 95-1
3. Boundary Map
r.%agdrpt%95%1212~asst95-1 .reelnip
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA FOR INTENTION TO MAKE
ACQUISITIONS AND IMPROVEM'EN'I~ FOR THE
WESTF_j~ BYPASS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1
THE CITY COUNCIL (the "COUNCIL") OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA (the "CITY"),
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Intention. The public interest, convenience and necessity require, and that
it intends to order the making of the acquisitions and improvements described in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and made a part hereof in and for the City's proposed Western Bypass
Assessment District No. 95-1 (the "Assessment District").
Section 2. Law Applicable. Except as hercin otherwise provided for the issuance of
bonds, all of the work shall be done as provided in the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913,
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of California (the "Act").
Section 3. Nature and Iocation of and Grades of Improvements. All of the work and
improvements are to be constructed at the places and in the particular locations, of the forms,
sizes, dimensions and materials, and at the lines, grades and elevations, as shown and delineated
upon the plans, profiles and specifications to be made therefor, as hereinafter provided. There
is to be excepted from the work above described any of such work already done to line and
grade and marked excepted or shown not to be done on the plans, profiles and specifications.
Whenever any public way is herein referred to as running between two public ways, or from or
to any public way, the intersections of the public ways referred to are included to the extent that
work is shown on the plans to be done therein. The streets and highways are or will be more
· particularly shown in the records .in. the office of the County Recorder of the County and 'shall
be shown upon-the plans.
Section 4. Change of Grade. Notice is hereby given of the fact that in many cases
the work and improvements will bring the finished work to a grade different from that formerly
existing, and that to the extent the grades are hereby changed and that the work will be done to
the changed grades.
Section 5. Work on Private Property. In cases where there is any disparity in level
or size between the improvements proposed to be made herein and private property and where
it is more economical to eliminate such disparity by work on the private property than by
adjustment of the work on public property, it is hereby determined that it is in the public interest
and more economical to do such work on private property to eliminate such disparity. In such.
cases, the work on private property shall, with the written consent of the owner of the property,
be done and the actual cost thereof may be added to the proposed assessment of the lot on which
the work is to be done.
1 rAegdrpt~.95\1212~asst95-1 .reslejO
Section 6. Official Grades. This Council does hereby adopt and establish as the
official grades for the work the grades and elevations to be shown upon the plans profiles and
specifications. All such grades and elevations are to be in feet and decimals thereof with
reference to the datum plane of this City.
Section 7. Descriptions - General. The descriptions of the acquisitions and
improvements and the termini of the work contained in this Resolution are general in nature.
All items of work do not necessarily extend for the full length of the description thereof. The
plans and profiles of the work and maps and descriptions as contained in the Engineer' s Report,
hereinafter directed to be made and filed, shall be controlling as to the correct and detailed
description thereof.
Section 8. Special Benefit and Boundary Map. The contemplated acquisitions and
improvements, in the opinion of this Council, are of more than local or ordinary public benefit,
and the costs and expenses thereof are made chargeable upon the Assessment District, the
exterior boundaries of which are shown on a map thereof on file in the office of the City Clerk,
to which reference is hereby made for further particulars. The map indicates by a boundary line
the extent of the territory proposed to be included in Assessment District and shall govern for
all details as to the extent of the Assessment District.
Section 9. Public Property Exempt. This Council declares that all public streets,
highways, lanes and alleys within the Assessment District in use in the performance of a public
function, and all lands owned by any public entity, including the United States and the State of
California, or any departments thereof, shall be omitted from the assessment hereafter to be
made to cover the costs and expenses of the acquisitions and improvements.
Section 10. Engineer' s Report. The acquisitions and improvements are hereby referred
to John Eagan, John Eagan & Associates, Inc., being a competent person employed for the
purpose hereof as Engineer of Work for this assessment district (the "Engineer of Work"), and
the Engineer of Work is hereby directed to make and file with the City Clerk a report in writing
(the "Engineer' s Report "), presenting the following:
(a) Maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to be acquired, if any;
(b) Plans and specifications of the proposed improvements if the improvements are
not already installed. The plans and specifications do not need to be detailed and are
sufficient if they show or describe the general nature, location, and extent of the
improvements. If the Assessment District is divided into zones, the plans and
specifications shall indicate the class and the type of improvements to be provided for
each zone. The plans or specifications may be prepared as separate documents, or either
or both may be incorporated in the Engineer's Report as a combined document.
(c) A general description of works or appliances already installed and any other
property necessary or convenient for the operation of the improvements, if the works,
appliance, or property are to be acquired as pan of the improvements.
2 r:\aOdrpt\95%121 2\asst95-1 .res/ajp
(d) An estimate of the cost of the improvements and of the cost of lands, rights-of-'
way, easements, and incidental expenses in connection with the improvements, including
any cost of issuing and registering bonds.
(e) A diagram showing, as they existed at the time of the passage of this Resolution,
all of the following:
(1) The exterior boundaries of the Assessment District.
(2) The boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District.
(3) The lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within the Assessment
District.
Each subdivision, shall be given a separate number upon the diagram. The diagram may
refer to the county assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions
of any parcels, in which case those maps shall govern for all details concerning the lines
and dimensions of the parcels.
(f) A proposed assessment of the total mount of the cost and expenses of the
proposed improvement upon the several subdivisions of land in the Assessment District
in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each subdivision, respectively,
from the improvement. The assessment shall refer to the subdivisions by their respective
numbers as assigned pursuant to subdivision (e). In the case of an assessment for
installation of planned local drainage facilities which are financed, in whole or pan,
pursuant to Section 66483 of the California Government Code, the assessment levied
:against each parcel of subdivided land may be levied on the basis of the proportionate
storm water runoff from each parcel.
When any portion or percentage of the costs and expenses of the acquisitions and
improvements is to be paid from sources other than assessments, the mount of such portion or
percentage shall first be deducted from the total estimated cost and expenses of the acquisitions
and improvements, and the assessment shall include only the remainder of the estimated cost and
expenses.
Section 11. Use of Surplus. If any excess shall be realized from the assessment it shall
be used, in such amounts as this Council may determine, in accordance with the provisions of
the Act, for one or more of the following purposes:
(a) Transfer to the general fund of this City, provided that the mount of any such
transfer shall not exceed the lesser of $1,000 or 5% of the total amount expended from
the improvement fund;
(b) As a credit upon the assessment and any supplemental assessment or for the
redemption of bonds, or both; or
(c) For the maintenance of the improvements.
: : 3 r:\egdrpt\95%1212%nest95-1 .reelsip
Section 12. Contact Person. Joseph Kicak, Public Works Director, City of Temecula,
is hereby designated as the person to answer inquiries regarding any protest proceedings to be
had herein, and may be contacted during regular office hours at 43174 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California 92590, or by calling telephone number (909) 694-6411.
Section 13. Contracts with Others. To the extent that any of the work, rights,
improvements and acquisitions indicated in the Engineer's Report, to be made as provided
herein, are shown to be connected to the facilities, works or systems of, or are to be owned,
managed and controlled by, any public agency other than this City, or of any public utility, it
is the intention of this Council to enter into an agreement with such public agency or public
utility pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 10100) of the Act, which agreement may
provide for, among other matmrs, the ownership, operation and maintenance by such agency or
utility of the works, rights, improvements and acquisitions, and may provide for the installation
of all or a portion of such improvements by the agency or utility and for the providing of service
to the properties in the area benefiting from the work, rights, improvements and acquisitions by
such agency or utility in accordance with its rates, rules and regulations, and that such
agreement shall become effective after proceedings have been taken for the levy of the
assessments and sale of bonds and funds are available to carry out the terms of any such
agreement.
Section 14.- Improvement Bonds. Notice is hereby given that serial and/or term
improvement bonds to represent unpaid assessments, and bear interest at the rate of not to
exceed such rate of interest as may be authorized by applicable law a time of sale of such bonds,
will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the Improvement Bond Act of 1915,
Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Bond Law"), the last installment
of which bonds shall mature not to exceed twenty-five (25) years from the second day of
September next succeeding twelve months from their date. The bonds shall be issued in such
series and shall mature in such principal amounts at such times as shall be determined by this
Council at the time of the issuance of such bonds. The provisions of Part 11.1 of the Bond
Law, providing an alternative procedure for the advance payment and calling of bonds, shall
apply to the bonds issued in these proceedings. It is the intention of this Council to create a
special reserve fund pursuant to and as authorized by Part 16 of the Bond Law. It is the
'intention of the City that the City will not obligate itself to advance available funds from the
treasury of the City to cure any deficiency in the redemption fund to be created with respect to
the bonds; provided, however, that the determination not to obligate itself shall not prevent the
City from, in its sole discretion, so advancing funds.
Section 15. Refunding of Bonds. The bonds may be refunded pursuant to the
provisions of Division 11.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code upon the determination
of the Council of the City that the public interest or necessity requires such refunding. Such
refunding may be undertaken by the Council when, in its opinion, lower prevailing interest rates
may allow reduction in the amount of the installments of principal and interest upon the
assessments given to owners of property assessed for the works herein described. The refunding
bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed that which is stated in the resolution of the
Council expressing its intention to issue the refunding bond, which resolution of intention shall'
also set forth the maximum term of years of the refunding bonds. The refunding shall be
accomplished pursuant to Division 11.5 (commencing with Sec. tion 9500) of the California-
Streets and Highways Code, except that, if, following the ~ing of the report specified in Section
4 r.\aOdrpt%95%l 212%east95-1 .res/ajp
9523 and any subsequent modifications of the report, the Council finds that each of the
conditions specified in the resolution of intention to issue the refunding bonds is satisfied and
that adjustments to the assessments are on a pro-rata basis, the Council may approve and confirm
the report and may, without further proceedings, authorize, issue and sell the refunding bonds
pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 9600) of Division 11.5 of the California Streets
and Highways Code.
Section 16. Division 4. Reference is hereby made to proceedings had pursuant to
Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of California which are on f~e in the office of the
City Clerk. It is the intention of this Council to comply with Division 4 of the Streets and
Highways Code of California by proceeding under Part 7.5 thereof. To that end, the Engineer
of Work is hereby directed to include in the Engineer's Report all of the material specified by
such Part 7.5 and for which the total true value shall be estimated as the full cash value of the
parcels of land in the Assessment District as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the
County.
Section 17. No Private Contract. Notice is hereby given that, in the opinion of this
Council, the public interest will not be served by allowing the property owners to take the
contract for the construction of the improvements and therefore that, pursuant to Section 20487
of the California Public Contract Code, no notice of award of contract shall be published.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEr}, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
r.\aOdrpt\g5%1212%nest95*1 .reslajp
[S AL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following
vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: -
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
K~agdrpt~95%l 21 2~am~t95-1 .reslejp
EXItIBIT
CITY OF TEMECULA
Western Bypass Assessment District No. 95-1
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The Western Bypass Corridor (WBC) will be constructed as a four (4) lane divided roadway
from near the Front Street/Highway 79 South intersection, to Vincent Moraga Drive, a distance
of approximately 5,600 feet. Vincent Moraga Drive, a four (4) lane undivided roadway, will
be constructed from this intersection, northerly, to join existing Vincent Moraga Drive,
approximately 1,200 feet.
Roadway grading will be completed for the future extension of the WBC approximately 3,400
feet from Vincent Moraga Drive to join Rancho California Road. No paving will be placed on
this section of the WBC as part of this project.
7 r:\agdrpt%gSX1212%seer95-1 .reele, jp
RESOLLrrION NO. 9.5-
A RESOLU~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA PRELIMINARILY APPROVING
ENGINEER'S REPORT AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH
RESPECT THERETO
THE CITY COUNCIL (the "COUNCIL") OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA (the "CITY"),
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Resolution of intention. On December 12, 1995, this Council adopted its
Resolution of Intention to Make Acquisitions and Improvements, (the "Resolution of Intention")
under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code
of California, (the "Act") to initiate proceedings under the Act in and for the City's Western
Bypass Assessment District No. 95-1 (the "Assessment District").
Section 2. Engineer' s Report. The Resolution of Intention referred the acquisitions
and improvements described therein to the person designated therein as the Engineer of Work
and directed the Engineer of Work to prepare and file with the City Clerk a report (the
"Engineer's Report") pursuant to the Act and containing information set forth in the Resolution
of Intention, to which reference is hereby made for further particulars.
Section 3. Engineer's Report Preliminarily Approved. The Engineer of Work has
prepared and filed the Engineer's Report with the City Clerk, and this Council with the aid of
City staff has reviewed the Engineer's Report, and hereby finds it to be sufficient for, and that
it shall stand for purposes of subsequent proceedings for the Assessment District and the
Engineer' s Report is hereby preliminaxily approved.
Section 4. Meeting and Hearing Ordered. Pursuant to the Act, this Council hereby
orders that a public meeting and a public hearing shall be held before this Council, in the regular
meeting place thereof, Community Recreation Center 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. The public meeting shall be held on January 23, 1996, at the hour of 7:00 o'elock
p.m. for the purpose of allowing public testimony regarding the proposed assessments for the
Assessment District. The public hearing shall be held on January 31, 1996, at the hour of 7:00
o'clock p.m. for the purposes of this Council's determination whether the public interest,
convenience and necessity require the acquisitions and improvements and this Council's final
action upon the Engineer's Report and the assessments therein.
Section 5. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice
of the meeting and the hearing ordered under Section 4 hereof to be given by mailing, postage
prepaid, in the United States mail, and such notice shall be deemed to have been given when so
deposited in such mail. The envelope or cover of the mailing shall include the name of the City
and the return address of the City Clerk as the sender. The mailed notice shall be given to all
property owners within the Assessment District as shown in the Engineer's Report by such
mailing by name to those persons whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized
] r:%agdrpt%95Xl 212%asst95-1 .reslajp
assessment roll of the County of Riverside or the State Board of Equalization assessment roll,
as the case may be. The notice shall include, but not be limited to, the estimated amount of
assessment per parcel, a general description of the purpose or improvements that the assessment
will fund and the address to which property owners may mail a protest against the assessment.
The notice shall contain a statement of the total principal amount of unpaid assessments already
levied against all the property in the Assessment District as computed in the Engineer's Report.
The notice herein provided shall be mailed not less than forty-five (45) days before the date of
the public hearing ordered under Section 4 hereof.
Section 6. Boundary Map. The proposed boundaries of the proposed Assessment
District are hereby described as shown on a map thereof on file in the office of the City Clerk
(the "Boundary Map"), which indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory to be
included in the proposed Assessment District and which Boundary Map shall govern for all
details for further purposes of the proceedings for the Assessment District and to which
reference is hereby made for further particulars. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to endorse upon the original and at least one copy of the Boundary Map the date of the
filing thereof and date and adoption of this resolution and to cause a copy of the Boundary Map
to be fLIed with the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, in which all of the proposed
Assessment District is located, within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of this resolution, but in
no event later than fifteen (15) days before the date of the public hearing ordered under Section
4 hereof. The County Recorder shall endorse upon the Boundary Map the time and date of
filing and shah fasten the same securely in a book of maps of assessment and community
facilities districts which the County Recorder shah keep in his or her office. The County
Recorder shall index the Boundary Map by the name of the City and by the distinctive
designation of the proposed Assessment District.
r:\agdrpt\95\l 212\meet95.-1 .reelajp
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALWORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) as
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City' Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: -
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: -
C OUNCILMEMBERS:
3 E\agdrpt%95H 212\neff95-1 .mslejp
I'I'EM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Reject All Bids and Re-advertise the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10
PREPARED BY: ~r Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Reject all bids and authorize staff' to re-advertise the Waicott Corridor Project upon
acquisition of the necessary right-of-way·
2. Authorize the City Clerk to return bid bonds to all bidders.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and authorized the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Walcott Corridor Project,
PW94-10. This project will provide an all weather surface road (two travel lanes) from Nicolas
Road to La Serena Way by way of Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos, and Walcott Road. The project
also includes relocation of an existing 30" water main. The engineer's estimate for the street
improvements and water main relocation is $1,583,000 and $837,000, respectively. 'This
'brings the total estimated project cost to $2,420,000.
Eleven (11) bids for the project were publicly opened on August 24, 1995 and the results for.
the base bid are as follows:
Base Bid
1. Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc.
dba Genesis Construction ................. $1,716,637.50
2. Utah Pacific Construction, Company ......... $1,905,175.00
3. TNT Grading Inc ....................... $1,905,523.43
4. Paul Hubbs Construction Co., Inc ............ $1,927,655.70
5. C.A. Rasmussen, Inc .................... $1,955,190.70
6. Greg J. Harris Construction ............... $1,963,896.80
pwO4~agd rpt\95 ~ 1128~pw94-10. awd
7. American Contracting, Inc ................ $1,972,284.15
8. Highgrade Engineering, Inc ................ $1,985,715.25
9. Commercial Contractors, Inc. dba
Commercial Contractors Western Division., Inc.. $2,124,435.81
10. Vance Corporation ..................... $2,268,778.29
11. J. R. Pipeline Co., Inc .................... $2,389,004.25
After the bids were opened, several issues arose concerning the project. The apparent low
bidder, Genesis Construction requested a revision to the contract that would increase his bid
amount. The amounts being requested are for items that apparently not included in his original
bid. Also, during the design process the property owner had agreed to dedicate the necessary
right-of-way to connect the new improvements to the existing road. The property owner
decided during the bid process that he would prefer that the city acquire the property
necessary for the connection. We have therefore initiated proceedings to appraise and acquire
the subject right-of-way. These proceedings will take several months to complete.
Due to the issues outlined above we are recommending that all bids be rejected and that staff
be authorized to re-advertise the project upon acquisition of the necessary property.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact at this time. This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded
by Measure A and Development Impact Fees. The water main improvements will be paid for
by R.C.W.D.
pwO4~agd rpt\9 ,~ \ 1128~pw94-- 10 .awd
ITEM 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
(~l~Joseph KicRk, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and
Specifications for the Traffic Signal Installation at Margarita
Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79(S) (Project No. PW95-15)
PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW95-15,
Traffic Signal installation at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79(S)
upon receiving Caltrans approval.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council has approved iristallation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita
Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79(S). This intersection is currently controlled with a four-
way "Stop".
The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is
available to be advertised for construction. The project includes installation of a complete
traffic signal and minor roadway modifications. The estimated construction cost for this
project is $177,000. These plans are available for review in the City Engineer's office.
This signalization project is within the Caltrans, County of Riverside and the City of Temecula
right-of-way. Therefore, a multi-jurisdictional cooperation was necessary to expedite this
project. The County has reviewed and approved the plans and Caltrans is processing the
necessary encroachment permits.
A tentative cooperative agreement has been developed between the County and the City in
which the County will fund twenty-five percent (25%) and the City seventy-five percent
(75%) of the engineering and construction cost of this project. Caltrans will operate and
maintain the proposed signal system which will require a separate cooperative maintenance
agreement.
-1- r:~agd~t\95\1212~w95-15 .bid
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project is funded twenty-five percent (25%) by the County and the remaining seventy-five
percent (75%) by the City through the Surface Transportation Program (STP), which is a
federally funded program.
-2- r:~agdrpt\9~\1212~95-15 .b/d
I'IEM 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the Traffic
Signals, Lighting, and Road Improvements at the Intersection of
Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and State Route 79 (South) -
Project No. PW95-15
PREPARED BY: ~' Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH FUNDING FOR INSTALLATION OF A
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA
ROAD/REDHAWK PARKWAY AND SR-79 (S)
BACKGROUND:
The installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and
SR-79 (S) has been approved by the City Council and is necessary for safe and orderly
movement of traffic.
This intersection is within the Caltrans, County of Riverside and the City of Temecula right-of-
way. To finance this signalization project, the County and the City have reached a
Cooperative Agreement. This Cooperative Agreement which obligates the County for twenty-
five percent (25%) of the total cost and the City for the remaining seventy-five percent (75%),
is attached.
The City's share of the construction cost for this project is funded under the Surface
Transportation Program (STP) which is a federally funded source.
r.%agdfpt%95%1 21 2%coopagr. fes/ejp
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City's portion of the construction costs for this project is provided by STP funds.
Attachment:
1. Resolution 95-
2. Cooperative Agreement
r:~agdrpt%95%1212\coopagr. reslajp
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THR CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AIPROVING A COOPERATIVE
AGRR~MENT BETWEEN THE COUN'I~ OF RIVERSIDE
AND THE CITY OF TI~2VIF_,CUIA TO ESTABLISH FUNDING
FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT THE
INTERSF~TION OF MARGARITA ROAD/REDHAWK
PARKWAY AND SR-79 6)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUIA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk
Parkway and SR-79 (S) has been approved by the City Council of the City of Temecula and,
WltEREAS, this signal installation is necessary for safe and orderly movement of traffic
and,
WHEREAS, the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79 (S) is
within the Caltrans, County of Riverside and the City of Temecula right-of-way and,
WFIEREAS, a Cooperative Agreement for financing this signalization project has been
developed between the County and the City and,
WHEREAS, the Cooperative Agreement stipulates that the County finance twenty-five
percent (25%) of the total project cost and the City the remaining seventy-five percent (75%).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. That the City Council adopt a resolution and approve execution-of a
. Cooperative Agreement between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula for financing
installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79
(s).
Section 2. Authorize the mayor to sign and execute the Cooperative Agreement.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
c %agd rpt%H% 1212%coopug r. reel;
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:Aagdrpt%95%1 21 2%coopagr.res/ajp
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
FOR THE DESIGN AND' CONSTRUCTION
OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS, LIGHTING AND ROAD IMPRO~N~
AT THF~ INTERSECTION OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) AND
MARGARITA ROAD/RFTsHAWK PARKWAY
This Agreement entered into this day of ,1995, is between
the County of Riverside, referred to herein as "COUNTY", and the City of Temecula referred
to herein as "CITY".
RECITALS
(1) COUNTY and CITY desire to install traffic control signals and safety lighting
improvements, referred to herein as "PROJECT", at the intersection of State Route
79 (South) and Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway, and desire to specify the terms and
conditions under which PROJECT is to be engineered, constructed, financed, operated
and maintained.
(2) PROJECT intersection is jointly owned twelve. and one half percent (12.5%) by
COUNTY, thirty-seven and one half percent (37.5%) by CITY, and fifty percent
(50%) by STATE.
(3) The State of California Department of Transpomtion (CALTRANS) will operate and
maintain the signals and highway lighting under the terms and conditions of a separate
Cooperative Maintenance Agreement.
(4) It is anticipated that Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds wffi be allocated for
financing seventy-five percent (75 %) of the construction costs and County Signal
Mitigation Funds for financing twenty-five percent (25%) o:f the construction costs.
CITY and COUNTY will bear the remainder of the costs as set forth herein.
(5) It has been determined that the State of California pwmulgated traffic signal warrants~
have been met for the PROJECT intersection.
Section I
CITY AGREES:
(1) To pay an amount equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of pROJECT construction and
engineering costs.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
To prepare plans, specifications, and estimates, referred to herein as "PS & E", for
PROJECT, by employing CITY forces or constdtant, in accordance with the Standard
Plans and Specifications of the State of California Department of Transportation
(CALTRANS), the standards and practices of COUNTY and all applicable laws and
regulations.
To assure that final design documents and drawings for PROJECT are prepared by
or under the direction of a civil engineer registered and licensed in the State of
California, and that the specifications, each set of plans and any reports shall bear the
seal, certificate and signature of the professional engineer responsible for their
preparation.
To submit PS&E to COUNTY and CALTRANS for review and final approval.
To identify and locate all high and low risk underground facilities, including above
and below ground utilities and construction obstacles, to protect, remove, relocate or
otherwise provide for such facilities, and to pay seventy-five percent (75 % ) of the
costs thereof.
To apply for any necessary encroachment permits for work within COUNTY'S and
CALTRANS' right-of-way, in accordance with COUNTY and CALTRANS permit
procedures.
To advertise, award and administer a Public Works Contract for construction of
PROJECT.
To retain or cause to be retained for audit by COUNTY or other governmental
2 rAtrafi~,95~:o!aignl.agm/ll/29/951ajp
(11)
auditors for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment, all records and
accounts relating to PROJECT.
Upon completion of PROJECT, to furnish COUNTY and CALTRANS each a
complete set of full-sized reproducible "Drawing of Record'' plans.
To enter into an agreement with CALTRANS, whereby CALTRANS will agree to
operate & maintain PROJECT, and CITY will pay fifty percent (50%) of the
maintenance and energy costs for PROJECT. In the event of annexation of any
portion of PROJECT by CITY the maintenance and energy costs shall be
re, apportioned in accordance with the revised ownership shares.
To acquire, furnish in fee, and fund one hundred percent (100%) of the costs for any
necessary fight-of-way for PROJECT that is located within City jurisdiction.
SECTION H
COUNYY AGREES:
(1) That COUNTY's share of the construction costs shall be an amount equal to twenty-
five percent (25%) of the total actual construction costs, as determined after
completion of the work and final accounting of costs. See Attachment "A" .
(2) To deposit with CITY within twenty-five (25) days of receipt of billing thereof (which
billing may be forwarded immediately following CITY's bid advertising date of a
construction contract for PROJECT) the amount of $50,751 which figure represents
COUNTY'S estimated share of the cost of preliminary engineering, construction
engineering, utility negotiation, inspection, and construction, as required to complete
PROJECT. In no event will COUNTY' s obligation for all anticipated costs under this
Agreement exceed one hundred fifteen percent (115%) of the COUNTY's estimated
costs, as listed in Exhibit "A", provided that COUNTY may, at its sole discretion, in
" 3 r,~,nffs:~9S~zVsign1.qm/ll/29/95/sjp
writing, authorize a greater amount. However, this does not obligate the CITY in any
way to provide additional funds for this PROJECT.
(3) To provide CITY with necessary policies, practices, procedures, specifications and
other standards required for the preparation of PS&E, for PROJECT.
(4) To provide, as appropriate, prompt review and approval of submittals by CITY and
to cooperate in timely processing of PS&E.
(5) To issue free of charge, upon application by CITY, the necessary Encroachment
Permits for required work within the COUNTY'S right-of-way.
(6) To enter into an agreement with CITY, whereby COUNTY will pay twelve and one
half percent (12.5 %) of the maintenance and energy costs for PROJECT. In the event
of annexation of any portion of PROJECT by CITY the maintenance and energy costs
shall be reapportioned in accordance with the revised ownership shares.
(7) To acquire, furnish in fee and fund one hundred percent (100%) of the costs for any
necessary right-of-way for PROJECT that is located within COUNTY jurisdiction.
(8) To pay twenty-five percent (25%) of the costs of any work necessitated by the
presence of high and low risk underground facilities.
Section HI
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
(1) The total cost of PROJECT is estimated to be $221,640 (See Attachment 'A").
(2) Construction by CITY of any portion of PROJECT which lies within COUNTY right-
of-way or affects COUNTY facilities, shall not be commenced until the phns
involving such construction have been reviewed and approved by signature by C1TY'S
Director of Public Works, or a delegated agent, and COUNTY'S Director of
Transportation, or a delegated agent and until an Encroachment Permit authorizing.
such construction has been provided to C1TY by COUNTY.
(3) In the event that CITY awards construction contract for PROJECT prior to approval
4 r.~nffw~,gS~signl.a~n/ll/29/gS/ajl~
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
O)
by COUNTY of contract PS&E, COUNTY may, at its sole discretion, either
terminate the contract by written notice, or limit COUNTY funding of project to those
COUNTY costs as described in Exhibit *A" , with no formal notice by COUNTY to
CITY required for said limitation of COUNTY funding.
If, upon opening bids for construction of PROJECT, and if bids indicate a cost
overrun of no more than fifteen percent (15%) of the construction cost estimate as
described in Attachment "A" will occur, CITY may award the contract.
If, upon opening of bids, it is found that a cost overrun exceeding fifteen (15%) of
the construction cost estimate will occur, CITY and COUNTY shall endeavor to agree
upon an alternative course of action. If, after thirty (30) calendar days from the date
of bid opening, an alternative course of action is not agreed upon, this agreement shall
be deemed to be terminated by mutual consent, with each agency sharing incurred
costs in accordance with the cost shares as set forth in Section I, Article (1), Section
II, Article (1) and Section III, Article (1).
CITY shall not award a contract to construct PROJECT until after receipt of the
COUNTY'S deposit required in Section II (3).
All contract change orders exceeding fifteen percent (15%) of the bid price for the
relevant contract bid items shall be submitted by CITY to COUNTY for review and
approval prior to authorization by CITY to construction contractor.
During construction, of said work, CITY will furnish a representative to perform the
function of Resident Engineer, and COUNTY may furnish a representative.
COUNTY's representative may consult with CITY's representative, but the CITY's
decision shall be final.
No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made
in writing and signed by both parties, and no oral understanding or agreement not
incorporated herein shall be binding on either party hereto.
5 r. Xta'tffk:\95Xeopaignl .agm/l 1/29/9Slajp
(10)
(11)
(12)
IIII
IIII
Upon completion of all work under this Agreement, ownership and title to all
materials, equipment, and appurtenances installed shall be shared among COUNTY,
CITY and CALTRANS in accordance with ownership shares.
Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any
damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by
CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to
CITY under this Agreement. It is further agreed that, pursuant to Government Code
Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify and hold COUNTY harmless from any
liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring
by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection
with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement.
Neither CITY nor any officer or .e. mployee thereof shall be responsible for any damage
or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COUNTY
under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY
under this Agreement. It is also agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section
895.4, COUNTY shall fully indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any liability
imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by
reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COUNTY under or in connection
with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY under this Agreement.
r:.~raf~95~sigul.agm/l 1/29/95/ajp
Notices:
Any notice required to be sent pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent by regular
mail, addressed as follows:
City of Temecula
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
County of Riverside
David E. Barnha,
Director of Transportation
P.O. Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92052
CITY OF TEMECULA
Dated:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Dated:
By:
Attest:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Chairman,
Board of Supervisors
Attest: Gerald Maloney,
Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors
· By:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
By:
Deputy Clerk of the Board
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William C. Katzenstein,
County Counsel
By:
Deputy County Counsel
7 r:.~afficX95k~siSnl.qm/l 1/29/951ajp
SIGNAL LOCATION
STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) AND MARGARITA ROADfREDHAWK PARKWAY
Construction
Cost $
Preliminary
Engineering
7.7%
BRW Contract
TPC/O'Rourke Contract
Construction
Engineering
15%
TOTALS:
City' s 'share of TPC\
O'Rouke Contract paid
by County
EXHIBIT'
ESTIMATE OF COST
TOTAL COSTS COUNTY SHARE
(100%) (25%)
177,000.00 $ 44,250.00
$ 13,630.00 $ 3,407.50
$ 4,460.00 $ 1,115.00
$ 26.550.00 $ 6.637.50
$ 221.640.00 $ 55.410.00
$ $ -3,345.00
BALANCE: $ 221.640.00 $ 50.751.00
CITY SHARE
(75%)
$132,750.00
$ 10,222.50
$ 3,345.00
$ 19.912.50
$166.230.00
$ 0.00
$166.229.00
8 r..\ttaf~\95k~l,iVfi.agm/llr29/95/ajp
ITEM 13
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
.~'~joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Completion and Acceptance of the Moraga Road Street Widening,
Project No. PW92-10
PREPARED BY:/~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the Moraga Road Street Widening, Project No. PW92-10, as
complete and direct the City Clerk to:
1. File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
'Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and
2. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
of Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
On March 14, 1995, the City Council awarded a contract for the Moraga Road Street
Widening, Project No. PW92-10, to Ronald L. Harris Construction for $102,721.00. The
project which widen the west side of Moraga Road between Margarita Road and Rancho
California Road included the extension of a double box culvert, grading of the channel,
providing additional pavement and striping and placing landscaping along the channel banks.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days
after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
r:~agdtpt\95\1212~/2-10.ac~
FISCAL IMPACT:
The contract amount for this project was $102,721.00. Contract Change Orders No. I and
2 were approved by the City Manager in the amount of $5,838.48. Also the final field
quantities for various bid items increased by $2,020.94 bringing the total construction cost
to $110,580.42. This will leave a balance of $2,412.68 in the project's contingency.
Sufficient funds have been transferred from Measure A to the Capital Improvement Fund,
account #210-165-625-5804.
Attachment:
Notice of Completion
Maintenance Bond
Contractor's Affidavit
r:~agdtpt\95\1212~92-10.g
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 hiram Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SPACE
ABOVE TH; UNE FOR
RECORDER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Ronald L. Harris Construction to
perform the following work of improvement:
Moraga Road Street Widening
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was
accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on December
12, 1995. That upon said contract the Continental Casualty Company was surety for the bond given
by the said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 92-10.
6. The street address of said property is: West side of Moraga Road between Margarita
Road and Rancho California Road.
Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of
· 1995.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I,. June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of
,1995.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
Forms/C1P-00l Roy. 12-5-<)1 pwO4\pw92~pw92-10\completn.not 112995
BOND: 137803689
PREMIUM: $ 50, O0
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
pROJECT NO. PW92-10
MORA GA ROAD WIDENING
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE pRESENTS THAT:
RONALD L. HARRIS CONSTRUCTION, 1756 PUEBLO CREST, LA HABRA, CA 90631 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR
~ND~VIDUAL , hereinefter called Principal, and
a (fillin ,~hztl. ra ~, Pa, u.; ~/aii; orindividuell
CONTINENTA~ CASUALT~ COMPAre. P,O. BOX 2800, BRF. A. CA
NAME AND ADDtLFSS OF SURETY
hereinafter called SURETY, are held and firmly bound Re CITY OF TEMECULA,
hereinafter cared OWNER, inthe penal sum of ELEVEN THOUSAND FZFTY EZGHT DOLLARS
DOLLARS
CBIT$ |$ 11,058.00 } in lawful money of the United States, for the paymere
ul to be made, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns, jointly and
which sum wall and try
severally, firmly by these presents.
Corrtract with the , reof for the construction of RtO,l~llO ~-IOMORAGA
hereto attached and made a pert he ' -'
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal wi furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the period of J29g year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER, against
an de~ccts in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period: and
WHEREAS. the Mid Contract has been completed, end wee sOproved on NOVEMBER 28 ,
19 9_2_5-
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBUGATION I$ SUCH, that if within one mr hem
the-date of aOproval of the said Contract, the work done under ~he terms of said Contract stall
disclose poe' workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said
Contract, or it shall appear that defective matefiats were furnished thereunder, then this obligation
shall remain in full force and vii, otherwise this instrun~nt shall be void.
Signed end sealed this 28THday of NOVEMBER
· 19 95 .
(Seal)
SURETY
By: CONTINENTIAL CASUALTY COMPANY
(Ns~le) DWIGHT REILLY
(1'~3e| ATTORNEY IN FACT
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
PRINtPAL
By: RONALD L. HARRI~ CONSTRUCTION
By:
(Name)
Continental Casualty Company
CNA
For All the Commitments )bu Make'
AN ILLINOIS CORORATION
POWER OF ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
Know All Men by these Presents, That CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws
fl
of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in the City of Chicago, and State .o Ilinois, a. nd having its pnn. ciDal office in the City
of Chicagc, and State of Illinois, does hereby make, constitute and appoint Dw3 qht Rel 11 y, I ndl vl clual I y
of Aliso Viejo, California
its true and lawful Attorney-in-fact with full Dower and authority hereby conferred to sign, seal and execute in its behalf bonds, undertakings
and other obligatory instruments of similar nature
- In Unlimited Amounts -
and to bind CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY thereby as/ully and to the same extent as it such instruments were signed by the duly
authorized officers of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and all the acts of said Attorney, pursuant to the authority hereby given are
hereby ratified and confirmed.
This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By-Law duly adopted by the Board of Directors
of me Company.
"Article IX--Execution of Documents
Section 3. Appointment of Attorney-in-fact The Chairman of the Boarcl of Directors, the President or any Executive, Senior or Group
Vice President may, from time to time, appoint by written certificates attorneys-in-fact to act in behalf of the Company in the execution
of policies of insurance, bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of like nature. Such attorneys-in-fact, subject to the
limitations set forth in their respective certificates of authority, shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution
f
of any such instruments and to attach the seal of the Corn any thereto. The Chairman of the Board o Directors, the President or any
Executive, Senior or Group Vice President or the Board of ~irectors, may, at any time, revoke all power and authority previously given
to any attorney-in-fact"
This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board
of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 17th day of February, 1993.
"Resolved, that the signature of the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President and the seal of the Company raP'
be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney granted pursuant to Section 3 of Article IX of the By-Laws, and the signature of t
Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any certificate of any such power aL
any such power or certificate bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company. Any such power
so executed and sealed and certified by certificate so executed and sealed shall, with respect to any bond or undertaking to which
it is attached, continue to be valid and binding on the Company."
State of Illinois } ~
County of Cook ss
On this 2rid day of May
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
~..~ Group Vice Pr:sident
,19 94 , before me personally came
M.C. Vonnahme. to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he resi0es in the Village of Downers Grove, State
of Illinois; that ne is a Group Vice President of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed
the above instrument; that he knows the seal of said Corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that
it was so affixed pursuant to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed pursuant to authority given by the Board
of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto pursuant to like authority, and acknowledges same to be the act and
need of said corporation.
~c* a,,,,,
l, Jonn M. Littier. Assistant Secreta~ of CONTINENTAL CASUAL~ COMPANY, do ceffify that the Power of Attorne ~above set fo~h
)s still in force. and runner cenify mat Section 3 of me ARicie IX of the By-Laws of the Company and me Resolution orthe Board of Directors,
set forth In said Power of Attorney are still in force. In testimony whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the
said Company this 28TH day of NOVEMBER
Form 1-23142-B
95 .
As~'~istant Secretary.
INV. NO.G-56623-C
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BEe.NAmYrNO
NOVEMBER 28, 1995
On
, before me, J. JOB)ISTON
Notary Public, personally appeared
DWIGHT REILLY
XZX personally known to me - OR -
__ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
~~~d official seal.
Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the data Deiow is not requ,rec~ Dy law, it may prove valuaDle to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulenl
reaTIacnmenl of th~s form
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Ind~woual
Corporale Ofl',cer
Title(s)
__ Pa.'Iner(s) __L~meled
__GeneraJ
~ A~ornev-ln-Fact
__ Trustee(s)
GuarO~andConservator
Other:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Name of Person(s) or Entity0es)
CONTTNENTAL CASUALTY COEBAI',TY
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
2
NUMBER OF PAGES
NOVEMBER 28, 1995
DATE OF DOCUMENT
PRINCIPAL
SIGNER(S) OTHERTHANNAMEDAEOVE
State Of California
County of San Diego
On/~Af/-~'/~./5~/" ~,~; , 1995 before me, Beverly J. SchliU, No~ Public,
person~lyappe~~~ ~.~~f~ ,
[ ] ~rson~ly ~own m me - OR - IX] prov~ m me on ~e basis of ~sfacm~ evidence
be ~e person whose name is ~bsc~bed to ~e ~in imminent ~d ac~owle~ge~ to me
~at she execu~d ~e ~me in her au~o~ capacid, and ~at by her si~mre on ~e
intomerit ~e ~rson or ~e en~ u~n behalf of which ~e person acted, ex~uted ~e
ins~ment.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Bev~r~~tary Public
BEVERLY 3.'?.S~ j t
~ NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA ~
tr COMMISSION NUMBER ~87056 ':"
II I[
OPTIONAL
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
//~O]: DOC~Y'$7//~%MENT
NO. OF PAGES
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[ ] INDIVIDUAL
[ ] CORPORATE OFFICER
[ ] PARTNER [ ] LIMITED
[ ] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
[ ] 'TRUSTEE
[ ] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
,~ OTHER://~/7~ /""'
SIGNER IS REPRESZG:
TITLE
[ ] GENERAL
NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW92-10
MORA GA ROAD WIDENING
This is to certify that ~ 7~ C l' I ~ ,
"CONTRACT.OR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that heat has paid in full for all
materials, supOlies, labor, se~ices, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the
CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in
contribution to the execution of it's contra~ with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building,
erection, construction, or repair of that ce~ain work of improvement known as ~OJE~ NO.
~92-10 MO~ RO~ ~DB~G situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more
pa~icularly described as follows:
~TLE OF WORK HERE
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising o~ of uid
Contract which would constit~e grounds for any third pa~y to claim a stop notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Fu~her, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description
Dollar Amount to Dispute
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and. all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputlad above.
Dated:
Print Name and Title
RELEASE R-1 pwO4~iplprojectm%pw92-10~idPkg 112994
ITEM 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINA~v~AENDAI
. CITY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
December 12, 1995
Professional Services Agreement for Geotechnical Observation and
Testing with Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc., for Project
No. PW95-09, Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station
84.
PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Edward Stone, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Geotechnical
& Environmental Engineers, Inc., for Geotechnical Observation and Testing for Project No.
PW95-09, Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84 for an amount not
to exceed $33,649.00, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement;
BACKGROUND:
On November 14, 1995, the City Council approved the award of a construction contract for
Project No. PW95-09, Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84 to Great
West Contractors, Inc.. These services are required in conjunction with the rough grading,
mainline sewer improvements, Pauba Road improvements, and special inspections required by
the Building Code for concrete, masonry, and structural welding.
A request for proposal (RFP) for Professional Services was prepared for the Geotechnical
Observation and Testing portion of this project. The four (4) geotechnical firms submitted
proposals for these services. Proposals were reviewed and a contract was negotiated with
Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc., who was selected to provide the required
services. The geotechnical consultant will perform grading observation and testing, trench
backfill compaction testing, inspection and testing of concrete, masonry, structural steel
welding inspection and preparation of a final report as stated in exhibit "A" of the contract.
-1- r:~agdtpt\95~lO12~agdtpt
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Fire Station facility and site improvements will be funded by Fire Mitigation funds
budgeted in the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 1995-1996, Account No. 210-
190-626-5804,and the improvements to Pauba Road will be funded with Development Impact
Fees, account No. 210-165-660-5804
ATTACHMENT:
Professional Services Agreement
-2-
r:~agdrpt\95\1212\geoagd~t
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of December 12, 1995, between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Geotechnical & Environmental
Engineers CConsultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on December 12, 1995 and shall
remain and continue in effect antil tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than December 12, 1996, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth
in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in
Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently
and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment
rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent
on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Thirty Three Thousand, Six Hundred Forty
Nine dollars ($33,649.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is
· approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in
connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth
herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City
Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the
manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City' s written authorization is
given to Consultant for the performance-of said services. The City Manager may approve
additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no
event shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess
of this amount shall be approved by the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.'
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of.
each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give
- 1 - r.. ~ci!~\projecla~t~v95-09\le. oaln~t
written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth
on the invoice.
SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT
CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend
or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten
(10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately
cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends
or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void
or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section
3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement
shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for
any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by
written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the
performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant' s control, and without
fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service
. upon it of said. notice in which tO dure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In
the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall
have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this
Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be
enti~ed at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to' the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall
be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly
identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of
City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the fight to.
examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as
-2 - r. \~ip\projc~\pw95-Og~geoqrmt
necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, dam, documents, proceedings and activities
related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be
maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys,
notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused
or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to
computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by
the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall
not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a
location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify,
protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and
against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind
or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may
be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under
the terms of this' Agreemerit, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the
City.
9. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain
for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to
property which may arise from or'in connection with the performance of the work her. under by
the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shah be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 000l).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
coveting Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession. '
than:
be
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less
'3- r..\cip\projecla~pw95-O9\Seo~m~
(D
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general. aggregate limit is
used, either the genera/aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
and property damage.
(3)
Employer's Liability: $1,0013,000 per accident for bodily injury
or disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied
or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
-4- r: \cip~projects~pw95-Og\ge,~qnnt
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against Whom claim is made or suit is bwught, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty
(30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt
requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be
on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City
before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may
provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements
effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly
independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf
of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither
City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of
ConsUltant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this
Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever
against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with
the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed
of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or
in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant
shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its
officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the
Consultant to comply with this section.
: : '5- r:~cip\projects~p~v95-Og\geongnnt
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement
shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior
written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not
without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney,
voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to
interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or
relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court
order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court
order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work
performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City
retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any
deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and
to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by
Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right
by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service,
(ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal
Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United
States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address
of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by
Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc.
27463 Enterprise Circle West
Temecula, CA. 92590
Attention: James R. Harrison
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent
of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this
Agreement, only Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers shall perform the services described
in this Agreement.
'6- r: \cip\projects\pwgS-09\geoagn~t
Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to
perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14)
days' notice prior to the departure of James R. Harrison from Consultant's employ. Should he
or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this
Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this
Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up
to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between
the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant
shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the
services described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that
the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of
the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any
litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal
district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire
understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this
Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and
statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or
effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth
herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party
deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or
persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she
has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to
bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year fLrSt above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
-'7- r: \cip\projec~\pw95-09~ge~mgrmt
Attest:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
CONSULTANT
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINF~
By:
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
'9- ~-\cip~projcctfipwg~.Og~l~oelmt
For this project we will apply the Technician II rate of $47.00/hr for our Senior Technicians.
We propose the following scope of services for rough grading control, utility trench backfill
testing, street improvement testing and structural inspection during site improvements:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Observation and Testing - Rough Grading, Building Site (Full Time)
· Senior Technician (176 hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $7,144.00
Inspections of Overexcavations and Slopes
· Project Engineer/Geologist (16 hrs @ $62/hr) ..................... $992.00
Trench Backfill Testing (Part Time - On Call)
· Senior Technician (30 hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $1,175.00
Parking Area Subgrade, Base & Asphalt Density Testing(3 Visits/2 hrs per Visit)
· Senior Technician (6 hrs @ $47/hr) ............................ $282.00
Observation and Testing - Rough Grading, Pauba Road (Full Time)
· Senior Technician (104 hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $4,465.00
Pauba Road Sewer Trench Backfill Testing
· Senior Technician (115 hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $5,405.00
Pauba Road Subgrade, Base & Asphalt Densities
· Senior Technician (12 hrs @ $47/hr) ........................... $564.00
Geotechnical-Footing Inspection, Building
· Senior Geologist/Engineer (2 hrs @ $60/hr) ...................... $120.00
Concrete Slab Inspection, Cast Cylinders and Slump Testing
· Senior Technician (12 hrs @ $47/hr) ........................... $564.00
Masonry Inspection, Apparatus Room, Retaining Wall .and Brick Veneer
(full time per UBC)/Casting Concrete Cylinders
· Deputy Inspector (160 .hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $6,580.00
Roofing Inspection-Bufltup Areas
· Deputy Inspector (16 Hrs @ $47/hr) ........................... $752.00
Structural Steel, Welding Inspection, Apparatus Room
· Deputy Inspector (40 hrs @ $47/hr) ........................... $1,504.00
Laboratory Testing
· Maximum Density (4 tests @ $100 each) ........................ $400.00
· Compressire Strength Testing
· Concrete Cylinder 6X12 1~66) ........................... $1,188.00
· Grout Prisms Single Block (4) ........................... $160.00
· Reinforcing Steel
· Tensile Strength (4)'. .................................. $252.00
· Bend Strength (4) .................................... $252.00
Final Report Preparation (1 report in 6 copies) .............. Lump Sum $1.850.00
Total ............................ $,33,649.00
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. Proposal 95-85
EXRBFF B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers,
GEOTECHNICAL FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY
GEO TECHNICAL, MATERIAL INSPECTION, AND TESTING SERVICES
Principal Engineer / Geologist ........................................................ $100 per hour
Associate Engineor / Geologist ....................................................... $ 95 per hour
Senior Engineer / Geologist .......................................................... $ 80 per hour
Project Engineer / Geologist ......................................................... $ 70 per hour
Senior Staff Engineer / Geologist .................................... · .................. $ 62 per hour
Staff Engineer / Geologist ........................................................... $ 55 per hour
Field Director .................................................................... $ 60 per hour
Senior Technician (Field I Laboratory) .................................................. $
Technician II ..................................................................... $
Technician I ..................................................................... $
Draftsperson ..................................................................... $
Clerical ......................................................................... $
Deputy Inspector .................................................................. $
SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
55 per hour
47 per hour
43 per hour
43 per hour
35 per hour
47 per hour
On-Site Vehicle Charges ............................................................ $ 4 per hour
Portable Refraction Seismograph ........................................... $ 40 per hour/$ 200 per day
Nuclear Moisture Density Gage ............................................. $ 5 per hourIS 25 per day
Road Rater (Pavement Deflection Testing) ............................................. By Arrangement
Other Geophysical Equipment ..................... · .................................. By Anangement
LABORATORY UNIT PRICES
Soft Moisture Content ............................................................ $
Sieve Analysis (+4 or -4) ..................................................... : .... $
Sand Equivalent ................................................................ $
#200 Wash .................................................................... $
Hydrometer With Sieve ............................................................ $
Plasticity Index ............. .................................................... $
10 Unit Price
48 Unit Price
43 Unit Price
30 Unit Price
90 Unit Price
78 Unit Price
Moisture I Density (Ring) .......................................................... $ 18 Unit Price
Maximum Density ............................................................... $100 Unit Price
Maximum Density (Modified) ....................................................... $110 Unit Price
Direct Shear ................................................................... $140 Unit Price
Conso~dation (W/O 7~me Rate) ..................................................... $100 Unit Price
With Time Rate, Add: (Per increment) ................................................. $ 25 Per Incrmt
Expansion Index ................................................................ $ 85 Unit Price
R-Value ............................. '.. '. ....................................... $185 Unit Price
Sulfate .............................. °. ........................................ $ 37 Unit Price
Corrosivity ..................................................................... $ 90 Unit Price
Permeability (Falling or Constant Head) ............................................... $150 Unit Price
Compression Tests - Concrete Cylinders .............................................. $ 18 Unit Price
Extraction Tests - Hot Mix Asphalt ................................................... $165 Unit Price
Specific Gravity- Soft and Aggregate Base ............................................. $ 65 Unit Price
Stability and Air Voids - Hot Mix Asphalt ............................................... $180 Unit Price
Mix Design - Hot Mix Asphalt and Concrete ............................................ By Arrangement
TERMS OF PAYMENT
Invoices rendered for professional services ere due upon presentation. A sen/ice charge of 1.5 percent'per month may be charged
on accounts not paid within 30 days to cover additional processing and carrying costs. Any attomey's fees or o~er costs incurred
in co~ecting any delinquent account will be paid by the client.
An overtime charge of 33.3% ~f hourly rates will be added for time in excess of 8 hours per day (excluding travel) and time before
7:00 a.m. and after 5 p.m. or on Saturdays. An overtime charge of 50% will be charged for time in excess of 12 hours per day and
on Sundays or legal holidays. Charges for travel to or from project are free up to a maximz)m of II2 hour each way. All travel time
m excess of 1/2 hour each way will be charged at straight time.
27447 Enterprise Circle West . Tcmccula · CA 92590 . TEL ( 909 ) 676,8337 · FAX ( 909 ) 676,4583
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM
1
MINUTES. OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD NOVEMBER 28, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:43
PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
President Ron Roberrs presiding. '
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone
0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve
Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Stone
abstaining.
.Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
2. Naming of a Newly Acquired Park Site
Community Services Deputy Director Herman Parker presented the staff report.
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman of Community Services Commission, addressed the
Board of Directors regarding their decision to recommend naming the new park "The
Duck Pond." He listed the Commission's reasons as preservation of heritage for the
property and the accepted traditional name has always been Duck Pond. He
suggested that David Dixon's legacy be memorialized in another appropriate area of
the City.
Patricia Keller, P.O. Box 521, requested the City retain the name of "The Duck
Pond", or if another name is contemplated, that a name contest be held to allow the
r:\minutes.csd~l 12895 - ' -1-
children the opportunity to name the park.
Director Birdsall suggested the park be called "The David F. Dixon Memorial Park"
with "The Duck Pond" underneath. She stated she received numerous phone calls
in favor of this suggestion.
Director Stone stated that although he believes it is a thoughtful gesture and
although he did admire David Dixon's efforts and talents, he believes the gateway
to the community is not an appropriate place for this memorial. He suggested that
a more appropriate place would be in the new City Hall.
President Roberts suggested that the name of the park be "The Temecula Duck
Pond."
RECESS
President Roberts called a brief recess at 8:00 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 8:01 PM.
Director Parks stated he is in favor of the name the "The Temecula Duck Pond" but
requested that staff diligently pursue another location for a memorial to David F.
Dixon.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to name the newly
acquire park site "The Temecula Duck Pond." The motion was unanimously carried.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Director Shawn Nelson reported that on December 1 st, at 6:00 PM, the Santa Electric
Light Parade will be held.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT
Director Birdsall announced she has been appointed to the Community Services Committee
of the League of California Cities.
r:\minutes.csd\l 12895 -2-
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:12 PM to a
meeting on December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Ronald H. Roberts, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
District Secretary
r:\minutes.csd\l 12895 -3-
ITEM 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors Temecula Community Services District
General Manager
December 12, 1995
Election of Community Services District Officers for 1996
PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk
1. Entertain motions from the Board of Directors to select
the President to preside until the end of calendar year
1996.
2. Entertain motions from the Board of Directors to elect the
Vice President who will assume the duties of the
President in the President's absence and will hold this
office until the end of calendar year 1996.
RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND: The Community Services District Board of Directors selects a
member to serve as President and Vice President annually. These offices are assumed at the
first meeting of the Community Services District in January and the newly elected officers
preside through the calendar year of 1996.
R:~aeerda.rl~t~Meyer I
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ITEM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV/~,L
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFF! R
CITY MANAGERS,
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
December 12, 1995
Advanced Chemill Systems Owner Participation Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
1)
That the Redevelopment Agency and the board members adopt a resolution
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-
DISCUSSION:
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY
AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND ADVANCED CHEMILL SYSTEMS, A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION
Advanced Chemill Systems operates a facility that manufactures equipment for
semiconductors in Temecula. They have recently relocated from Corona to Temecula. The
facility, which consists of a 13,000 square foot building, and appurtenant equipment will
employ fifty five (55) employees within two years of the initiation of business in Temecula.
The average salary of these positions will be $20,800 per year. Advanced Chemill Systems
is requesting $10,000 from the Redevelopment Agency to offset moving expenses. The
Agency agrees to reimburse Advanced Chemill Systems a total of $10,000 relocation
expenses subject to maintaining operation at the facility for a minimum of five (5) years and
shall continuously employ not less than thirty (30) full-time employees within two (2) years
from the date of initiation of business activities at the facility. If the conditions are not met,
the company must repay the $10,000.
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE IIFX}EVFJ~OPMENT AGENCY OF ~
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION
AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE R~r}EVELOPMF~NT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ADVANCED
CHEMILL SYSTEMS, A CM. IFORNIA CORPOI~TION
THE I~FJ}EVELOPlV!ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY. OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Advanced ChemiH Systems (Participant) has relocated from Corona to
Temecula to a 13,099 sq. ft. building facility.
B. The total cost of the relocation to the new facility is not less than $10,000.
C. Once fully equipped and operating, the facility will create a total of fifty five
(55) positions; thirty (30) of which will result from their relocation to Temecula. The average
salary of these positions will be $20,800 per year.
D. In order to induce Participant to remain in the Facility in Temecula, expand
the business operations, and thereby eliminate blight and generate employment opportunities in
the Project Area, the Participant needs the assistance of the Agency in helping to offset the costs
of relocation.
E. Pursuant to § 33444.6 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the
Redevelopment Agency finds that the proposed financial assistance is necessary for the economic
feasibility of the relocation of Advanced Chemill Systems to the City of Temecula; and that the
relocation assistance could not be obtained on economically feasible terms from the private
market. This finding is based on the fact that without the financial assistance proposed by the
Redevelopment Agency, the Facility would not relocate to the City of Temecula creating a
substantial loss of jobs, sales tax and property tax revenue for the City, County, and State.
Section 2. Based upon the above findings, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula hereby appwves the Owner Participation Agreement by and between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Advanced Chemill Systems, a California
Corporation.
LAX2:I25594.1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Temecula at a regular meeting on the __ day of 1995.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, Agency Secretary of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby
certify that Resolution No. RDA 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __ day of ,1995, by the
following vote:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
LAX2:115594.1 2
THIS OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into
and effective as of , 1995 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body corporate and
politic (the "Agency") and ADVANCED CHEMILL SYSTEMS, a California Corporation (the
"Participant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the
Agency and the Participant hereby agree as follows:
Section 1. Recitals
The parties enter into this Agreement on the basis of the following facts, understandings
and intentions:
a. The purpose of this Agreement is to effectuate the Redevelopment'Plan
(the "Plan") for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1 (the "Project Area")
by providing for the elimination of blight in the Project Area and for economic
revitalization within ~he Project Area through the stimulation of new and expanded
business activity and the creation of 'employment opportunities.
b. Participant is prepared to conduct a business at the Site which will enhance
the goals of the Agency in eliminating blight and creating employment opportunities in
the Project Area:
c. Participant presently has on the Site one building of appwximately 13,000
square feet (the "Facility'), used to manufacture equipment for the semiconductor
industry. Participant presently employs twenty-five (25) full-time employees. Participant
proposes'to expand its operations at the site by adding a minimum of thirty (30) full-time
employees within two years of the initiation of business activities at the Facility.
d. This Agreement is entered into for the purpose of inducing the Participant
to relocate its business to the City of Temecuh and to operate a business at the Site and
not for speculation in land holding.
e. This Agreement pertains to and affects the ability of the Agency to finance
its shamtory obligations and for all parties to finance and carry out the purposes of this
Agreement and the goals of the Plan and is intended to be a contract within the meaning
of Government Code § 53511.
LAX2:125595.2 Seplmi~ 5, 1995
Section 2. The Redevelopmerit Plan
The Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area was approved by Ordinance No. 658 of
the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County on July 12, 1988, prior to the incorporation of the
City of Temecula. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-11, which became effective May 9, 1991,
and City Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City approved the
Plan. Said Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over said
Plan to the Agency, as of July 1, 1991. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 93-04 and 94-03, Ordinance
No. 91-11 was codified at § 8.04.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code. The Plan was amended
by Ordinance No.. 94-33, adopted on December 20, 1994.
Section 3. The Site
The Site is located at 43153 Business Park Drive, City of Temecula which is within the
Project Area.
Section 4. Parties to the Agreement
a. The Agency is a public body, corporate and politic, exercising
governmental functions and powers and is organized and existing under the Community
Redevelopment law of the State of California (§ 33000, et sea_., Health and Safety Code;
the "Act"). The principal office and mailing address of the Agency is 43174 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. All references to approvals by the Agency
shall mean the Agency Board, unless another Agency Officer is specifically designated
in this Agreement.
b. The Participant is a California corporation duly organized and existing
under the hws of the State of California. The principal office and mailing address of the
Participant is: Advanced Chemill Systems, 43153 Business Park Drive, Temecuh,
California 92590. Participant is the record owner of the Site and therdore qualifies as
an "Owner Participant" within the meaning of the Redevelopmerit Plan and the California
Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code § 33000, et sea_.).
Section 5. Agency and Participant Obligations
a. In order to induce Participant to relocate its business to the City of
Temecula, to remain in business at the Facility and to expand business activities, the
Agency agrees to reimburse the Participant a total of $10,000 relocafion expenses
incurred in connection with the move of the business from the City of Cowna to the
Facility in the City of Temecula, subject to the following conditions:
(1)
Participant shall operate the Facility to produce equipment for the
semiconductor industry or substantially similar products for a
25595.2 ~ s, ~99s 2
minimum of five (5) years from the date of the initiation of
business activities at the Facility; and
(2)
Participant shall add and continuously employ not less than t!firty
(30) full-time employees within two (2) years from the date of
initiation of business activities at the Facility.
The parties hereto agree that the *date of initiation of business activities at the Facility* as used
in this Agreement is April, 1995.
b. Participant warrants and represents that any information it has supplied to
the Agency pertaining to the relocation of Advanced Chemill Systems is true, correct and
complete in all material respects. Participant represents that any projection, including
but not limited to information concerning the projected job creation resulting from the
Facility contained at Section 1, is true, correct and complete in all material respects
according to the best available information.
c. In the event the Participant fails to comply with the conditions set forth
in this section, the Agency may demand that Participant repay the $10,000 relocation
payment to the Agency within thirty (30) days of the Agency's demand for such
payment, subject to the default provisions of this Agreement.
Section 6. Anti-Discrimination Obli~,ations
The Participant agrees by and for itself and any successors in interest that there shall be
no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race,
color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, age, handicap, national origin or ancestry in the sale,
lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Site, nor shall the
Participant itself or any person claiming under or through it establish or permit any such practice
or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number,
use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the Site.
Section 7. Notices. Demands. and Communications Amont, the Parties
Written notices, demands and communications between the Agency and the Participant,
shall be sufficiently given by personal service or' dispatched by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the principal offices of the Agency or the
Participant described in Section 4. Such written notices, demands and communications may be
sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate
by mail as provided in this Section. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein,
notice personally served shall be deemed to have been received as of the date of such service.
LAX2:125595.2 Sepu~ber 5, 1995 3
Section 8. Enforced Delay: Extension of Tames of Performance
a. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by any
party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default, and all performance and other dates
specified in this Agreement shall be extended, where the party seeking the extension has
acted diligen~y and delays or defaults are due to events beyond the reasonable control
of the party such as but not limited to: war, insurrection, strikes, lockouts, riots, floods,
earthquakes, fires, casualties, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, epidemics,
quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, intergalactic invasion, lack of transportation,
litigation, unusually severe weather, or any other causes beyond the control or without
the fault of the party claiming an extension of time to perform.
b. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, an extension
of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall
commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the party
claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty (30) days of the
commencement of the cause.
c. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in
writing by the mutual agreement of the Executive Director of the Agency and the
Participant.
Section 9. Inspection of Books and Records
Each party has the right to inspect, at reasonable times, the books and records of the
other parties pertaining to the Site as pertinent to the purposes of the Agreement.
Section 10. Indemnification
The Participant shall defend, indemnify, assume all responsibility for and hold the
Agency, and its respective elected and appointed officers and employees, harmless from all costs
(including attomcy's fees and costs), claims, demands or liabilities judgments for injury or
damage to property and injuries to persons, including death, which may be caused by any of the
Participant's activities under this Agreement and on the Site, whether such activities or
performance thereof be by the Participant or anyone direc~y or indirec~y employed or
contracted with by the Participant and whether such damage shall accrue or be discovered before
or after termination of this Agreement. This indemnity includes, but is not limited to, any
repair, cleanup, remediation, detoxi~cation, or preparation and implementation of any removal,
remedial, response, closure or other plan (regardless of whether undertaken duc to governmental
action) concerning any hazardous substance or h~7~rdous wastes including petroleum and its
fractions as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act ["CERCLA"; 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et se~_.], the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act ["RCRA"; 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et sea_.] and California Health and Safety Code Section
Code Section 25280 et seo_. at any place where Participant owns or has control of real property
,5595.2 sq,~m~r 5, 1995 4
pursuant to any of Participant's activities under this Agreement. The foregoing indemnity is
intended to operate as an agreement pursuant to Section 107(e) of CERCLA and California
Health and Safety Code Section 25364 to assure, protect, hold harmless and indemnify Agency
from liability.
Section 11. Defaults - General
a. The failure or delay by either party to perform any term or provision of
this Agreement constitutes a default under this Agreement. A party claiming a default
(claimant) shall give written notice of default to the other party, specifying the default
complained of. The defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days within which to cure the
default.
b. In the event the Participant fails to cure the default, the Agency may
terminate this Agreement upon two (2) business days notice to Participant. 'In the event
the Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the Participant shall repay to the
Agency all funds paid by the Agency to Participant pursuant to this Agreement within
thirty (30) days of the demand for such funds.
Section 12. Le?al Actions
a. In the event a default is not cured as provided in this Agreement, the non-
defaulting party may exercise all rights and remedies available to it by law.
b. In the event such litigation is ~ed by one party against the other to
enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the
Court' s judgment, shall be enti~ed to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for
the relief granted.
c. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and
enforcement of this Agreement. '
d. Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights and
remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by any party of one or more of
such rights or remedies shall not preclude the. exercise by it, at the same or different
times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the
other party.
e. Any failures or delays by any party in asserting any of its rights and
remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such
rights or remedies, or deprive any such party of its right to institute and maintain any
actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any
such rights or remedies.
LAX2:12~595.2
Sep~mbct$,l~5 5
Section 13. Compliance With AH Laws and Regulations
The Participant shall carry out the provisions of this Agreement in conformity with all
applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations, including, without limitation, such laws
and regulations pertaining to the payment of prevailing wages which might be applicable to its
obligations.
Section 14. Entire Agreement. Waivers & General
a. This Agreement is executed in duplicate originals, each of which is
deemed to be an original. This Agreement includes pages 1 through 7, which constitutes
the entire understanding and agreement of the parties.
b. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein
or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the
parties or their predecessors in interest with respect to all or any part of the subject
matter hereof.
c. All amendments hereto must be in writing executed by the appropriate
authorities of the Agency and the Participant.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
Effective Date.
I~FJ3EVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
'By:
RONALD PARKS
Chairperson
ATTEST:
~:125595.2 Sc~cmbct 5, 199~ 6
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PETER M. THORSON
General Counsel
ADVANCRD CHEMILL SYSTEMS, INC.,
a C_nllfornia Corporation
LAX2:I2559S.2 ~ 5, 1995 7
ITEM 2
CITY MANAGER~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
FROM:
Executive Director
DATE:
December 12, 1995
SUBJECT: Election of Redevelopment Agency Officers for 1996
PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: 1.
Entertain motions from the Agency members to select the
Chairperson to preside until the end of calendar year
1996.
Entertain motions from the Agency members to elect the
Vice Chairperson who will assume the duties of the
Chairperson in the Chairperson's absence and will hold
this office until the end of calendar year 1996.
BACKGROUND: The Redevelopment Agency selects a member to serve as
Chairperson and Vice Chairperson annually. These offices are assumed at the first meeting
of the Redevelopment Agency in January and the newly elected officers preside through the
calendar year of 1996.
ITEM 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Redevelopment Agency Board Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
December 12, 1995
Professional Hospital Supply Owner Participation Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
Continue a public hearing for Professional Hospital Supply Owner Participation Agreement to
December 19, 1995.
DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends that the item be continued as a portion of the Owner Participation
Agreement has not been finalized.
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
HELD NOVEMBER 28, 1995
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 8:55 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5
ABSENT: 0
BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
BOARD MEMBERS: None
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995.
It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Parks to
approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was unanimously carried with
Board Member Stone abstaining.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. Financina for Old Town Area Public Imorovements and the Western BYpass Corridor
City Manager Bradley presented the staff report and recommended that this matter
be continued until the neXt' scheduled meeting.
It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Parks to
continue the four (4) Public Hearings listed below to the meeting of December 12,
1995:
CFD 1 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes
CFD 2 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes
CFD I Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 1
CFD 2 Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD NO. 2
The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone abstaining.
Agenda.fa\l 12895 -1-
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Board Member Parks, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to adjourn
at 8:57 PM to a meeting on December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
Agenda.fa\l 12895 -2-
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCe-
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Authority Members
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
December 12, 1995
Financings for Old Town Public Improvements and the Western Bypass
Corridor
RECOMMENDATION: That the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority approve the respective resolutions described below.
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO COMPLEXITY OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO COMPLEXITY OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND
CONTINUING PUBLIC HEARINGS
BACKGROUND: On September 12, 1995, the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted a series of resolutions (the "Resolutions
of Intention") relative to its intention to establish a Community Facilities District No. I (Old
Town Area Public Improvements) and a Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area
Public Improvements) (collectively, the "Districts"). The resolutions called for a series of two
public hearings for each of the Districts, one each with respect to the formation of and levy
of special taxes in the 'respective District, and one each with respect to the incurrence of
R:INORTONLL4GENDASIPHRESO. AGN 1 11/27/95
bonded indebtedness of the respective District (collectively, the "Public Hearings"). The Public
Hearings were originally scheduled to occur on October 17, 1995.
On October 10, 1995 the Authority adopted two resolutions amending the respective
Resolutions of Intention for the Districts to include within the proposed boundaries of the
Districts the proposed arena area, and changing the date of the Public Hearings called pursuant
to the Resolutions of Intention from October 17, 1995 to November 14, 1995. On November
14, 1995 the four Public Hearings were opened and continued to November 28th and further
continued to December 12th.
Staff has been working diligently with the proponent of the Old Town project, T.ZoB.G., Inc.
to arrive at a more definitive description of certain facilities to be financed by the Districts that
ultimately will be owned and/or operated by public agencies other than the City of Temecula.
Proceedings to complete the formation of the Districts cannot be advanced until agreements
have been executed by such other public agencies. Due to the complexity of the proposed
facilities and the need for them to accommodate development in the Districts, it is necessary
for the Authority to again continue the Public Hearings for the Districts.
The California Government Code permits the Public Hearings to be continued for more than
thirty days, and for up to six months, upon a finding by the Authority that the complexity of
the Districts requires additional time. The attached resolutions make the finding for each of
the Districts and further continue the Public Hearings to January 9, 1996.
FISCAL IMPACT:' None.'
Attachments:
Resolutions
R:WORTONL tAGENDAS|PHRESO.A GN 2 11'/'27/96
RESOLUTION NO. FA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ OLD
TOWN/WESTSIDE COM]~fUI~TY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO COIVIIrL,EXITY
OF COMIVIUNITY FACIIATIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLn TOWN AREA
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC HEARINGS
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution of
intention to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District") and
a resolution of intention to incur indebtedness for the District (collectively, the "Resolutions of
Intention"); and
WHEREAS, the Resolutions of Intention called for public hearings to be held on October
17th relative to the proposed District; and
WHEREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution
amending the Resolutions of in~ention to include additional territory within the boundaries of the
District, and to change the date for the public hearings called pursuant to the Resolutions of
Intention from October 17, 1995 to November 14, 1995; and
WHEREAS, on November 14, 1995, this Board of Directors opened the public hearings
relative to the District and continued the hearings to November 28th and again continued to this
date; and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has been informed that the facilities to be financed
by the District involve other jurisdictions, including the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District, and are further complicated by the need to serve a developing
portion of the City of Tcmecula, and that additional design and engineering work is needed
before the proceedings to form the District can continue; and
WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the proposed facilities, it is appropriate for this
Board of Directors to make a finding of complexity of the District under Section 53325 of the
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), and to further continue
the public hearings as provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
· Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and, accordingly, this Board of Directors
finds that additional time is necessary to determine the scope of the facilities necessary to serve
the needs of the District and to complete necessary joint community facilities district agreements
with other public agencies, such that the complexity of the proposed District requires additional
time to complete the hearings initially called pursuant to the Resolutions of Intention.
R: INORTONL tAGENDA $|PHRESO. AGN
1/27/95
2. In light of the complexity of the proposed District, the public hearings called pursuant
to the Resolutions of Intention, commenced on November 14, 1995 and continued to November
28th and again continued to this date, are hereby continued to January 9, 1996 and, at the
direction of this Board of Directors, may be further continued from time to time thereafter for
a period not to exceed six months, all as permitted by Section 53325 of the Act.
PASSED, APPROV!~ AND ADOFrED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/
Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the
12th day of December, 1995.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk/Authority Secretary
R:INORTONLtAGENDAS|PHRESO. AGN 4 11/27/95
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-rRRF. Ry DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. FA 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the
12th day of December, 1995, by the following roll call vote:
AUTHORITYMEMBERS:
NOES:
AUTHORrrYMEIvfBERS:
AUTHOR1TYM~MBERS:
ABSTAINED:
AUTHOR1TYM~MBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
Authority Secretary/City Clerk
R: IIVOR TONL IA OENDA$|PHRESO. AGN 5 11/27/95
RESOLUTION NO. FA 95-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLT}
TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACHATIES DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO COMPLEXITY
OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20YESTSIDE AREA
PUBLIC IMPROVEMINTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC H~ARINGS
WItF. REAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution of
intention to:form the Old Town/West.side Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) (the "District") and
a resolution of intention to incur indebtedness for the District (collectively, the "Resolutions of
Intention"); and
WHEREAS, the Resolutions of Intention called for public hearings to be held on October
17th relative to the proposed District; and
WHEREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution
amending the Resolutions of intention to include additional territory within the boundaries of the
District, and to change the date for the public hearings called pursuant to the Resolutions of
Intention from October 17, 1995 to November 14, 1995; and
WHEREAS, on November 14, 1995, this Board of Directors opened the public hearings
relative to the District and continued the hearings to November 28th and again continued to this
date; and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has been informed that the facilities to be financed
by the District involve other jurisdictions, including the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District, and are further complicated by the need to serve a developing
portion of the City of Temecula, and that additional design and engineering work is needed
before the proceedings to form the District can continue; and
WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the proposed facilities, it is appropriate for this
Board of Directors to make a finding of complexity of the District under Section 53325 of the
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), and to further continue
the public hearings as provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE rr- RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and, accordingly, this Board of Directors
finds that additional time is necessary to determine the scope of the facilities necessary to serve
the needs of the District and to complete necessary joint community facilities district agreements
with other public agencics, such that the complexity of the proposed District requires additional
time to complete the hearings initially called pursuant to the Resolutions. of Intention.
R: b'tlORTONL IA GENDAStPHRESO.A GN 6 ~ ~'/27/95
2. In light of the complexity of the proposed District, the public hearings called pursuant
to the Resolutions of Intention, commenced on November 14, 1995 and continued to November
281h and again continued to this date, are hereby continued to January 9, 1996 and, at the
direction of this Board of Directors, may be further continued from time to time thereafter for
a period not to exceed six months, all as permitted by Section 53325 of the Act.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/
Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the
12th day of December, 1995.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATrF. ST:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk/Authority Secretary
R:WOFITONLtAGENDAS|PHRESO. AGN 7 11/27/95
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. FA 95-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the
12th day of December, 1995, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
AUTHORITY'MEMBERS:
AU'ltIORITYMF~MBERS:
AUTHOEITYMF~MBERS:
AUTHORiTYMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
Authority Secretary/City Clerk
R: INORTONL IAGENDAS|PHRESO.AGN 8 1 I/27/95
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Old TownANestside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Executive Director
December 12, 1995
Election of Financing Authority Officers for 1996
PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: 1.
Entertain motions from the members of the Community
Facilities District Financing Authority to select the
President to preside until the end of calendar year 1996.
Entertain motions from the Authority members to elect the
Vice President who will assume the duties of the
President in the President's absence and will hold this
office until the end of calendar year 1996.
BACKGROUND: The 'Old Town/Westside Facilities District Financing Authority
selects a member to serve as President and Vice President annually. These offices are
assumed at the first meeting of the Financing Authority in January and the newly elected
officers preside through the calendar year of 1996.
R:~,a4lende.rpt%Meyet I
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
HELD NOVEMBER 28, 1995
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 8:57 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Board Member Parks, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to approve
Consent Calendar Item No. 1.
1. Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995.
The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone abstaining.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Board Member Parks, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to adjourn
· at 8:58 PM to a meeting on November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875.Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
r:\minutes.otwe\l 12895
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:' Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Improvement Authority
FROM: Executive Director
DATE: December 12, 1995
SUBJECT: Election of Improvement Authority Officers for 1996
PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: 1.
Entertain motions from the members of the Community
Facilities District Improvement Authority to select the
President to preside until the end of calendar year 1996.
Entertain motions from the Authority members to elect the
Vice-President who will assume the duties of the
President in the President's absence and will hold this
office until the end of calendar year 1996.
BACKGROUND: The Old Town/Westside Facilities District Improvement Authority
selects a member to serve as President and Vice President annually. These offices are
assumed at the first meeting of the Improvement Authority in January and the newly elected
officers preside through the calendar year of 1996.
R:%aVeoda.q~jleya, I
ITEM 15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director~
December 12, 1995
Request to Designate Certain Private Property as "No Skateboarding,
Rollerblading or Similar Activity Area."
PREPARED BY:
Stephen Brown, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DESIGNATING PRIVATE PROPERTY AT 42690
MARGARITA ROAD AS A "NO SKATEBOARDING,
ROLLERBLADING OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY AREA" PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 10.36 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE.
BACKGROUND:
The City has received a request to declare certain private property as "No Skateboarding,
Rollerblading or Similar Activity Area" as permitted by City Ordinance No. 94-18. This
Ordinance was recently adopted to prohibit skateboarding in certain areas of the City
designated by the City Council. The Temecula United Methodist Church has made this request
to have their private property designated as a no skateboarding area. The new concrete
parking lot built in conjunction with the church has attracted numerous skateboarders to the
area creating conflict with the construction crews and posing a liability for the church.
Ordinance 94-18 requires that the property owner submit a written application requesting the
"no skateboarding" designation. After the proper application is received and proper notice is
given, the City Council may, by resolution, designate the area in question as a "no
skateboarding area" and request that the area be posted as such. After the appropriate signs
have been posted designating the site as a "no skateboarding area", the police may cite the
violators. A site plan has been submitted by the applicant which illustrates the area to be
designated as "no skateboarding".
R:~STAFFRPT~KATB.CC3 11/22/95 slb 1
FISCAL IMPACT:
Potential positive fiscal impact to property owners due to decrease in property damage.
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 95- - Page 3
2. Application from Temecula United Methodist Church - Page 6
R:~FAFFRFI'XSKATE.CC3 11/22/95 db 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
R:\STAFFRPT~SKATE.CC'~ 11/22/95 db ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING PRIVATE PROPERTY AT
42690 MARGARITA ROAD AS A "NO SKATEBOARDING,
ROLLERBLADING OR SIMHJAR ACTIVITY AREA"
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 10.36 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 94-18 established Chapter 10.36 of the Tcmecula
Municipal Code and adopted by ordinance permits the City Council to prohibit skateboarding,
rollerblading or similar activity in certain designated areas; and,
WHEREAS, the efforts of the property owners at 42690 Margarita Road to control
skateboarding, rollerblading and similar activities have been unsuccessful to date; and,
WHEREAS, private. property at 42690 Margarita Road has the potential to receive
damage in connection with skateboarding, rollerblaring and similar activities; and,
WHEREAS, the property owner of 42690 Margarita Road has requested the City to
designate the property as a "No Skateboarding, Rollerblaring or Similar Activity Area"; and,
WHEREAS, the property owner has submitted a written application and required exhibits
in conformance with Chapter 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal Code; and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on December 12, 1995, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either support or in opposition; and,
WHEREAS, notice of proposed action was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho
California Branch, the U.S. Post Office, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
findings:
Fmdings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
A. The City Council in approving this Resolution makes the following findings to wit:
1. Ordinance 94-18 was enacted by the City Council to maintain the safety of the
general public, as well as the right to enjoyment of private property within the City.
2. Curren~y the unrestricted use of private property for skateboarding, rollerblaring
involves safety risks.
R:~STAFFRPT~KATE.CC3 11/22/95 slb 4
Code.
The action proposed is consistent with Chapter 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal
4. The action proposed complies with all other applicable requirements of state law
and local ordinances.
Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the establishment of a "No
Skateboarding, Rollerblading, or Similar Activity Area" on the property located at 42690
Margarita Road in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal
Code. Enforcement of the "no skateboarding, rollerblading, or similar activity" shall not
commence until appropriate signage has been posted as required by Chapter 10.36 of the
Temecula Municipal Code.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall Certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this day of
, 199 .
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF 'TEMECULA)
'I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of
, 199__ by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CITY COUNCiLMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
R:\STAFFRFI~KATE.CC3 11/22/95 ~lb
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
APPLICATION FROM TEMECULA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
R:\STAFFRPT~SKATE.CC3 11/22/95 slb
6
TEMECULA UNITED METHODIST. CHURCH
42690 MARGAR1TA ROAD
P. O. BOX 892350
TEMECULA, CA 92589
October 24, 1995
Ms. Debbie S. Ubnoske
Planning Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Ms. Ubnoske,
The purpose of this letter is to request a designation of a "No
Skateboarding, RoHerblading or Similar Activity Area" for our church
parking lot located at the above address.
We have just recently completed construction of our facility and
have already had individuals using the parking lot for recreation as
described above.
Our insurance company is also requesting that this action be
taken.*
AWjol
Annette Roberts
President, Board of Trustees
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
December 12, 1995
Adoption of the 1994 Editions of Various
Model Building Codes
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Open the Public Hearing, receive comments from the public, if any, and
continue the public hearing to December 9, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose
of hearing testimony for or against the adoption of Ordinance No. 95-__ and on
findings to be adopted in connection therewith.
Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
· ORDINANCE NO. 95---
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE *CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 15.02TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
PROVIDING FOR FEES AND ENFORCEMENT OF BUILDING REGULATIONS;
AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04AND 15.08 OF THIS MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1994
EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE
UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM
CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1994 EDITION
OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM
SWIMMING POOLS. SPAS AND HOT TUB CODE; AND .THE 1993 EDITION OF
THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE.
DISCUSSION:
The State of California Building Standards Commission has adopted the 1994 editions of the
Uniform Codes as published by the International Conference of Building Officials and the
International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, along with state agency ·
Agenda~1894Code. Rpt
Agenda Report
November 28, 1995
Page 2
amendments that appear in this Ordinance, are those that are generally administrative in
nature. This ordinance does, however, contain several amendments that staff feels are
necessary for maintaining the public safety in buildings within the City. Draft copies of this
ordinance have been distributed to the Building Industry Association and the Economic
Development Corporation, Expediting Committee, for review and comment.
Agenda~1994Code. Rpt
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 15.02 TO THE
TEMECULAMUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR FEES AND
ENFORCEMENT OF BUILDING REGULATIONS; AND AMENDING
CHAPTERS 15.04 AND 15.08 OFTHIS MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM
BUILDING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM
MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM
PLUMBING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OFTHE UNIFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM
CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1994
EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION
OF THE UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE; AND
THE 1993 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as
follows:
SECTION I: CHAPTER 15.02, "Fees and Enforcement," is added to
Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Temecula Municipal
Code to read as follows:
15.0a.010 Permit Fees. Fees for permits and services
rendered pursuant to these Building and Construction Regulations
shall be paid to the BUilding Official as set forth in schedules
established by Resolution of the City Council. The determination
of value or valuation under any of the provisions of these codes
shall be made by the Building Official. The value to be used in
computing the fees shall be the total value of all construction
work for which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work,
painting,' roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air
conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing systems and any other
permanent equipment.
15.02,020 Plan Review Fees. When submittal documents are
required by Section 302.2 of the Uniform Administrative Code as
adopted in Section 15.04,060 of this Municipal Code, a plan
review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting the submittal
documents for plan review. Said plan review shall be 75 percent
of the building permit fee as established by Resolution of the
City Council pursuant to Section 15.02.010 herein.
The plan review fees specified in this Section are separate fees
from the permit fees specified in Section 15.020,010 herein and
are in addition to the permit fees.
!:5341.1 i
When submittal documents are incomplete or changed so as to
require additional plan review or when the project involves
deferred submittal items as defined in Section 302.4.2 of the
Uniform Administrative Code, an additional plan review fee shall
be charged at the rate established by Resolution of the City
Council.
15.02.030 ~xpiration of Plan Review. Applications for
which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of
application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data
submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant
or destroyed by the Building Official. The Building Official may
extend the time for action by application of the applicant for a
period not exceeding 180 days on written request by the applicant
showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant
have prevented action from being taken. An application shall not
be extended more than once. An application shall not be extended
if this code or any other pertinent laws or ordinances.have been
amended subsequent to the date of application. In order to renew
action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall
resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee.
15.02.040 Civil Penalty. Any person, firm or corporation
who shall proceed with or commence work for which a permit is
required by these Building and Construction Regulations without
first having obtained such permit shall, if subsequently
permitted to obtain. a permit therefor, pay double the fee fixed
for such work. The original permit fee shall be for issuance of
the permit and the balance shall be-.a civil penalty. This
provision shall not apply to emergency work when it shall be
proved to the satisfaction of the Building Official that such
work was urgently necessary and that it was not practical to
obtain a permit before commencement of the work. In all such
cases a permit must be secured as soon as it is practicable to do
so, and if there is an unreasonable delay in securing the
required permit, the civil penalty as provided herein shall be
charged. In no event shall such civil penalty exceed the permit
fee plus $500.00. The Civil penalty provided in this Section
shall be in addition to any other fines and remedies prescribed
elsewhere in this Municipal Code. The payment of such fee and
fine shall not relieve any persons from fully complying with the
requirements of these Building and Construction Regulations in
the execution of the work.
15.02.050 Fee Refunds. The Building Official may authorize
refunding of a fee paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or
collected. The Building Official may authorize refunding of not
more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been
done under the permit issued in accordance with this Code. The
Building Official may authorize refunding of not more than 80
percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a
permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or
ORANGE: 5341.1 2
canceled before any examination time has been expended. The
Building Official shall not authorize the refunding of any fee
paid except upon written application filed by the original
permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment.
15.02,060 Violations. It shall be unlawful for any person,
firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair,
move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or
maintain any building or structure or cause or permit the same to
be'done in violation of Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of
this Municipal Code. Violations and violation penalties are
subject to Chapter 1.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
SECTION II= The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
amend Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Temecula
Municipal Code to adopt by reference certain uniform codes with
amendments as follows:
15.04,010 Codes Adopted. The following are hereby adopted
by reference as amended by Section III of this Ordinance, as the
Building Codes of the City of Temecula, one (1) copy of which is
on file in the office of the City Clerk:
Uniform Building Code, volumes 1, 2 and 3 of the 1994
edition with appendices and California State amendments;
Uniform Mechanical Code, 1994 edition with
appendices and California State amendments;
Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 edition with
appendices and California State amendments;
D. Uniform Administrative Code, 1994 edition;
Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings, 1994;
F. Uniform Housing Code, 1994 edition;
Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code, 1994
edition;
H. National Electrical Code, 1993 edition.
-.SECTION III= The City Council of the City of Temecula does
hereby amend Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the
Temecula Municipal Code to provide for amendments to certain
Uniform Codes adopted by reference under Section II of this
Ordinance as follows:
:5341.1 3
15.04.020 In general. The following amendments are made to
the Building Codes, 1994 editions, as adopted by this Chapter:
15.04.030 Oniform Building Code. The following amendments,
additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Building Code,
1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
Section 103 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to
Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this
Municipal Code.
Section 106.2 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 106.2 Work Exempt from Permits. A
building permit shall not be required for the
following:
Retaining walls which are not over two (2)
feet in height, and garden walls not over 4"
measured from the top of footing to top of
wall unless supporting a surcharge or
impounding flammable Class I, Class II or
III-A liquids.
Section 106.3.1 is hereby. amended by adding
thereto Subsection (8) to read as follows:
All contractors and their subcontractors must
have current and valid city business
licenses.
Section 107 is hereby deleted in its entirety and
superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thru 15.02.050 of
this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein
by reference. All references in the Uniform
Building Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee
tables shall mean the fee schedule as established
by Resolution of the City Council in accordance
with Section 15.02.010 her.in.
Table No. 1-A Building Permit Fees is hereby
deleted in its entirety·
Section 502 is hereby amended by adding thereto
the following:
ORANGE :53~,1.1
Numbers for commercial and industrial buildings
4
must be a minimum of twelve (12) inches in height
facing the street or front of the building. All
suites must have a minimum of (4) inch high
letters on both front and rear doors. Residential
usages must have as a minimum four (4) inch high
letters. All letters must be placed upon a
contrasting background.
G. Section 904 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 904.2.1 Where required. An automatic
fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in
the occupancies and locations as set forth in this
Section except where the 1994 U.F.C. applies. In
that case, the most restrictive provisions will
apply.
H. Section 1503 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 1503. The roof covering on any structure
regulated by this Code shall be as specified in
Table No. 15-A and as classified in Section 1504,
except that no roof covering shall be less than a
Class B roofing assembly.
~xception:
1. The roof'covering on any structure
regulated by this Code within the Historical
District Overlay, generally known as the Old
Town Temecula Historical Preservation
District, shall not be less than a Class C
roofing assembly.
2. The roof covering of any structure
located on a parcel with a minimum of one-
half acre in area may have a roof covering of
not less than a Class C Roofing Assembly when
approved by the Building Official.
3. The roof covering of all re-roofing
shall conform to the applicable provisions of
this Section as amended herein, except that
the roof covering for the re-roofing of ten
percent (10%) or less of the area of any roof
may consist of material comparable to the
remainder of the roof.
Section 1924 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 1924. The minimum thickness of concrete
floor slabs supported directly on the ground shall
not be less than three and one-half (3 1/2)
inches. All group R occupancies shall have a
.-':5341.1 5
minimum six (6) mil moisture barrier with minimum
two (2) inch sand cover.
Exception: 1. A moisture barrier shall not be
required under slabs on grade of open or enclosed
patios as defined in Section 217.
Section 1924 is hereby further amended by adding
thereto a new paragraph to read as follows:
Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels. In all occupancies,
slab connection from existing slabs to new
construction shall be placed at twenty-four (24)
inches on center with reinforcing steel on one
half inch minimum diameter, eighteen (18) inches
in length.
Appendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 paragraph i is
hereby amended to read as follows:
The top of the barrier shall be at least 60
inches above grade measured on the side of
the barrier which faces away from the
swimming pool.
Appendix Chapter 16'. Division I is hereby deleted
in its entirety.
Appendix Chapter 19 is hereby deleted in its
entirety·
Appendix Chapter 21 is hereby deleted in its
entirety·
ADDendiX Chapter 23 is hereby deleted in its
entirety.
15.04.040 Uniform Mechanical Code. The following
amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform
Mechanical Code, 1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter.
ORANGE:53/,1.1
Section 111 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations~and violation penalties are subject to
Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this
Municipal Code.
Section 115 is hereby deleted in.its entirety and
superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thru 15.02.050 of
this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated her,in
by reference. All references in the Uniform
6
Mechanical Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee
tables shall mean the fee schedule as established
by Resolution of the City Council in accordance
with Section 15.02.010 herein.
Section 504 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
Section 504.1. Makeup and exhaust ducts.
Bathroom and laundry room exhaust ducts may be of
gypsum wallboard subject to the limitation of
Section 1002(a). Aluminum flex ducts are not
permitted to be installed horizontally in rooms
that produce steam. An angle greater than forty-
five (45) degrees from the vertical is considered
a horizontal run.
15.04.050 Uniform Plumbing Code. The following amendments,
additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Plumbing Code,
1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
Section 102.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to
Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this
Municipal Code.
Section 103.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety
and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thru
15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly
incorporated her.in by reference. All references
in the Uniform Plumbing Code to fees, fee
schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee
schedule as established by Resolution of the City
Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010
herein.
Section 202{I) is hereby amended to read as
follows:
(a) Indirect Waste Pipe. An indirect waste pipe
is a pipe that does not connect directly with the
drainage system but conveys liquid wastes by
discharging through an approved air gap into a
plumbing fixture, interceptor or receptacle which
is directly connected to the drainage system.
Section 411 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
.'-:5341.1 7
Section 411.1 Floor drains shall be installed in
all compartments containing urinals or where hose
bibs are provided for washing down floors.
Section 719.5 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt
paving shall be made accessible by yard boxes, or
extended flush with paving with a "brass cap" or
other approved material for installation where
subject to vehicular traffic.
Section'1204.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
Testing of gas piping over two (2) inches in
diameter shall require a twenty-four (24) hour
graph test witnessed by the jurisdiction.
Section 1211.3 is hereby amended by adding the
following exceptions:
Exception: 1. The installation of natural gas
line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the
slab as approved by the Building Official.
Exception: 2. 'The installation of propane gas
line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the
slab as approved by the Building Official.
The following chapters from the appendices are hereby
deleted from the Uniform Plumbina Code, 1994 edition, adopted by
this ordinance.
Appendix E - mobile home parks and
recreational vehicle parks, is hereby deleted
in 'its entirety.
Appendix H - commercial kitchen grease
interceptors, is hereby deleted in its
entirety.
ADDendiX ChaPter 3 is hereby amended by adding a new
Section thereto as follows:
Section 318 Rodent proofing.
318.1 Rodent proofing. Plumbing systems shall be
designed and installed in accordance with Sections
318.2 through 318.4 so as to prevent rodents from
entering structures.
5341.1 8
318.2 Strainer plates. All strainer plates on
drain inlets shall be designed and installed so
that all openings are not greater than'l/2 inch in
least dimension.
318.3 Meter boxes. Meter boxes shall be
constructed in such a manner that rodents are
prevented from entering a structure by way of the
water service pipes connecting the meter box and
the structure.
318.4 Openings for pipes. In or on structures
where openings have been made in walls, floors or
ceilings for the passage of pipes, such openings
shall be closed and protected by the installation
of approved metal collars that are securely
fastened to the adjoining structure.
15.04.060 Uniform Administrative Code. The following
amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform
Administrative Code,.1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter.
Section 205 is. hereby amended by adding the
following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to
Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this
Municipal Code.
Sections 304.1 and 304.2 are hereby deleted in
their entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.010
of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated
her. in byreference. All references in the
Uniform Administrative Code to fees, fee
schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee
schedule as established by Resolution of the City
Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010
herein.
Section 304.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety
and superseded by Section 15.02.020 of this
Municipal Code, expressly incorporated her. in by
reference.
Section 304.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety
and superseded by Section 15.02.040 of this
Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by
reference.
15.04.070 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings. The following amendments, additions and deletions are
5341.1 9
made to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings, 1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter|
Section 203 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to
Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this
Municipal Code.
15.04.080 Uniform Housing Code. The following amendments,
additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Housing Code,
1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
Section 204 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to
Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this
Municipal Code.
Section 302 is hereby deleted in its entirety and
superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thru 15.02.050 of
this Municipa~ Code, expressly incorporated herein
by reference. All references in the Uniform
Housing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables
shall mean the fee schedule as established by
Resolution of the City Council in accordance with
Section 15.02.010 herein..
15.04.090 Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code.
following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the
Uniform Swimming Pool. SDa and Hot Tub Code, 1994 edition,
adopted by this Chapter:
Section 1.7 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
The
Violations and violation penalties are subject to
Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this
Municipal Code.
Section 1.11 is hereby deleted in its entirety and
superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thru 15.02.050 of
this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein
by reference. All references in the Uniform
Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code to fees, fee
schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee
schedule as established by Resolution of the City
Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010
herein.
ORANGE:53~1.1 10
Chapter 15.08 National Electrical Code is hereby deleted in
its entirety and superseded by the following:
15.04,100 National Electrical Code. The following
amendments, additions and deletions are made to the National
Electrical Code, 1993 edition, adopted .by this Chapter:
Section 90-4 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to
Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this
Municipal Code.
Section 110-5 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no
aluminum conductors smaller than #6 A.W.G. shall
be used.
Section 210-1 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
Accessory uses or other building, signs, etc.,
separately located on the same lot or premises,
shall have connecting conductors run underground.
(Agricultural area excepted.) Where spare circuit
protective devices are provided or space for
future circuit protective devices are provided on
the bus in any flush or semi-flush mounted panel,
then raceways of sufficient capacity to permit
utilization of such space or spaces shall be
provided to an approved accessible location. Such
accessible location is normally described as
follows: Where sufficient attic space is
available or under floor space is available, a
raceway shall terminate conveniently for future
use in each such space. Where this condition does
not exist or other factors govern, then such
terminations shall be approved by the Building
Official.
Section 336-3 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 336-3 Uses Permitted. Non-metallic
sheathed cable shall not be used for exposed
wiring, except as provided in Section 336-10(b),
and shall only be used in one and two family
dwellings or multi-family dwellings (apartment
E:5341.1 11
houses) not exceeding three (3) floors above
grade.
SECTION IV= Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 17958.5
and 17958.7, amendments to building standards as set forth herein
shall be accompanied by findings as adopted by Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Temecula.
SECTION V= If any Section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or the application thereof
to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application .to other
persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it
would have adopted this Ordinance, and each Section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections,
subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portions of
the application thereof to any person or place be declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION VI= The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by
law.
SECTION VII= This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days
following the date of adoption hereof.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
day-of
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ORANGE: 534. 1,1 12
ITEM 17
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
December 12, 1995
Adoption of the 1994 Edition of The Uniform Fire Code
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Open the Public Hearing, receive comments from the public, if any, and
continue the public hearing to December 9, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose
of hearing testimony for or against the adoption of Ordinance No. 95-._ and on
the findings to be adopted in connection therewith.
2. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE
THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1994 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM
FIRE CODE STANDARDS, 1994 EDITION.
DISCUSSION:
The State of California Building Standards Commission has adopted the 1994 edition of the
Uniform Fire Codes as published by. the International Fire Code Institute along with certain
amendments made by state agencies specifically the State Fire Marshall's Office. This action
makes it necessary for each local jurisdiction to adopt these codes and any local amendments
· necessary to assist them in the protection .of the public safety in buildings in their jurisdiction.
The recommended amendments that appear in Ordinance No. 95-_ are those that are generally
administrative in nature. This ordinance does, however, contain several amendments that
staff feels are necessary for maintaining the public safety in buildings within the City· Draft
copies of this ordinance have been distributed to the Building Industry Association and the
Economic Development Corporation and Expediting Committee for review and comment.
,- Agenda%1994Fire. Rpt
ORDINANCE NO. 95- ...
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE
-UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1994 EDITION, AND THE UNIFORM FIRE
CODE STANDARDS, 1994 EDITION
The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as
follows:
SECTION I: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
amend Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Temecula
Municipal Code to adopt by reference certain uniform codes with
amendments as follows:
15.16.010. Codes Adopted. The following are hereby adopted
by reference, as amended by Article II of this Ordinance, as the
Fire Code of the City of Temecula, one (1) copy of which is on
file in the office of the City Clerk.
Uniform Fire Code, 1994 edition, with appendices and
California State amendments.
B. Uniform Fire Code Standards, 1994 editions.
SECTION II: The City Council of the City. of Temecula does hereby
amend Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Temecula
Municipal Code to provide for amendments to certain Uniform Codes
adopted by reference under Section I of this Ordinance as
follows:
15.16.020. Amendments. The following amendments,
additions, and deletions are made to the Uniform Fire Code, 1994
edition, as adopted by this Ordinance.
Ae
ORANGE :5346.1
Section 204 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Corporate Counsel shall mean the City Attorney of the
City of Temecula.
B. Section 207 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Fire Chief, Fire Safety Specialist, Fire Systems
Inspector, Fire Prevention Officer is the officer,
regardless of rank, who has been appointed by the Fire
Chief to be in charge of the Fire Prevention Bureau,
and includes the duly authorized representative of the
Fire Chief for the purpose of enforcing this Code.
1
Section 214 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Municipality is the City of Temecula.
Section 901.4.4 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to
read as follows:
Premises Identification
Approved numbers and addresses shall be placed on all
new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road
fronting the property. Numbers shall be contrast with
their background. Commercial establishments shall have
12" numbers with suite numbers being 6" in size.
Single and multi-family residents shall have 4"
letters, or as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau.
Section 902.2.2.1 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended
to read as follows:
Dimensions
Fire apparatus roads shall have an unobstructed width
of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical
clearance of not less than 13 feet and 6 inches.
(Exception not modified)-
Section 902.2.2.2 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended
to read as follows:
Surface
Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and
maintained to support the imposed loads of the
apparatus and shall be with a surface so as to provide
all weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall
be 70,000 lbs. GVWwith a minimum of AC thickness of
.25 feet.
Section 902.2.2.3 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended
to read as follows:
Turnin~ Radius
The turning radius of a fire apparatus road shall be a
minimum of a 45 degree radius.
Section 902.2.2.3 of'the Uniform Fire Code is amended
to read as follows:
Dead Ends
Le
Dead end fire apparatus roads in excess of 150 feet
(45,720mm) in length shall be provided with approved
provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus.
Section 902.2.2.6 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended
to read as follows:
Grade
The gradient for a fire apparatus access shall not
exceed 15%.
Subsection (a) of Section 902.2.4.1.'of the Uniform
Fire Code is added as follows:
Penalty
The required width of Fire Department access roadways
shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the
parking of vehicles. "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs or
red painted curbs or other appropriate notice
prohibiting obstruction shall be required and
maintained. Any obstruction or impedance to said fire
lane may be cited, as an infraction, or removed at the
owners expense, forthwith, by any public agency.
Section 901.4.3 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to
read as follows:
Fire Protection Equipment and Fire Hydrants
Fire protection equipment and fire hydrants shall be
clearly identified in a manner approved by the Chief to
prevent obstruction by parking and other obstructions.
Hydrant locations shall be identified by the
installation of reflective markers (blue dots).
Installation of blue dots shall be in accordance with
Temecula fire services guidelines.
Section 902.4 is hereby amended to read:
Site Access
Where gates are proposed to be installed that are
electronically activated for access to a commercial or
residential site, an approved electronic key switch
shall be installed for emergency vehicle access.
Section 1003.2 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to
read as follows:
ORANGE: 5346.1
3
Required Installations
1. All Occupancies
Unless State Codes, Uniform Fire Code or Uniform
Building Code is more restrictive, every structure
hereafter constructed, except a residential structure
of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the square
footage listed in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform
Fire Code requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per
minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler
system installed throughout therein.
2. Existing-Occupancies
Unless State Codes, Uniform Fire Code or Uniform
Building Code is more restrictive, every existing
structure to which additions are made, where either
addition itself exceeds the square footage listed in
the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1 requiring a
fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute.
3. Change of Occupancy
Every existing structure to which a change of occupancy
occurs shall install sprinklers when required by the
Uniform Building Code or Uniform Fire Code.
Section 1003.3.1 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to
read as follows:
Where Required
All valves controlling the water supply for automatic
sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on a
sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored.
Valve monitoring and water-flow and trouble signals
shall be distinctly different and shall be
automatically transmitted to an approved central
station, remove station or proprietary monitoring
station as defined by U.F.C. Standard 10-2 or, when
approved by the Chief, shall sound an audible signal at
a constantly attend location. (Exception not
modified).
Appendix Chapter II-A, Section 24, is amended to read
as follows:
Cost Recovery
Section 24.1. Any person who negligently, or in
346.1 4
ORANGE:53~6.1
violation of law, sets a fire, allows a fire to be set,
or allows a fire kindled or artended by him to escape
his control or burn any structure, improvement, forest,
range or grassland, is liable for the expense of
fighting the fire, and such expense shall be a charge
against that person, and that charge shall constitute a
debt of such person which is collectible by the person,
or by the federal, state, county, public, or private
agency or the County Fire Department incurring such
expenses in the same manner as in the case of an
obligation under a contract, expressed or implied.
Section 24.1.1. Any person who negligently, or in
violation of any statute regulation or ordinance dumps,
or causes to be dumped, or releases or causes to be
released, any hazardous or extremely hazardous material
or hazardous waste onto the ground or int the
environment is liable for the expense of mitigating
and/or removing the hazard created by said actions or
omissions, and such expense shall be a charge against
such person or persons. Said charges shall constitute
a debt of such person or persons which shall be
collectible by the person, or by the federal, state,
county, public or private agency or by the County Fire
Department and/or the County Health Department
incurring the expense of mitigation and/or removal in
the same manner as in the case of an obligation under
arising contract, expressed or implied.
Section 24.2. The expense'of securing any emergency
which is a result of a violation of this ordinance is a
charge against the person whose violation of this
ordinance caused the emergency. Damages caused by and
expenses incurred by the Fire Department for securing
such emergency shall constitute a debt of such manner
as in the case of an obligation under a contract,
expressed or implied.
Section 24.2.1. The expense of securing any hazardous
or extremely hazardous materials or waste incident
which is a result of negligence or a violation of any
statute, regulation or ordinance is a charge against
the person or persons whose actions or omissions caused
the incident. The expenses incurred by the Fire
Department and/or Health Department for securing such
incident shall constitute a debt of such person or
persons and shall be collectible by-the County Fire
Chief or Health Officer in the same manner as in the
case of an obligation'arising under contract, expressed
or implied.
24.3. Structure improvement shall mean, for the
5
purposes of this Division only, any building, garage,
tent, out-building, barn, corral, fence, or bridge
whether or not in actual use at the time of the fire.
24.2. Requests for copies of public and legal
documents, photographs, etc., relating to department
activities are available as authorized by law through
the Fire Department's Custodian of Records. All
document requests shall be in writing, accompanied by a
check made payable to the Riverside County fire
Department, in the amount(s) set forth in Ordinance
671..
SECTION III: Unless otherwise specified in this Ordinance or the
Uniform Fire Code, all violations of this Ordinance are subject
to Chapter 1.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
SECTION IV: Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 17958.5
and 17958.7, amendments to building standards as set forth herein
shall be accompanied by findings as adopted by Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Temecula.
SECTION V: If any Section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or the application thereof
to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions 6f this Ordinance or its application to other
persons or'places. The City Council hereby declares that it
would have adopted this Ordinance, and each Section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections,
subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portions of
the application thereof to any person or place be declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION VI: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by
law.
SECTION VII: This Ordinance shall be effective thrity (30) days
following the date of adoption hereof.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
day of
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
0 5346.1
6
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ORANGE: 53~,6.1
7
ITEM 18
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
December 12, 1995
Election of Council Officers for 1996
PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: 1.
Entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to select
the Mayor to preside until the end of calendar year 1996.
Entertain motions from the City Councilmember to elect
the Mayor-Pro Tem who will assume the duties of the
Mayor in the Mayor's absence end will hold this office
until the end of calendar year 1996.
BACKGROUND: The City Council selects a member to serve as Mayor and Mayor
Pro-Tem annually. These offices are assumed at the first meeting of the City Council in
January and the newly elected Mayor and Mayor Pro-Tem preside through the calendar year
of 1996.
R:~Oe~de.rptUdeyor I