Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout121295 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD DECEMBER 12, 1995- 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Invocation: Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 95-14 Resolution: No. 95-100 Reverend David French, Temecula United Methodist Church Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone Proclamation - Lt. Col. Donald T. Rohrabacher, (USMC Ret.) Presentation of Award to Winner of the Old Town Temecula Logo Contest to winner Don Berg PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. R:~Agenda%121296 1 CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 3 Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Report RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1995. Release Labor and Material Security in Parcel MaD No. 22629 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council Authorize release the Labor and Material portion of the security for the improvement of streets and drainage in Parcel Map No. 22629. 4.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer. R:'~a~gende%121296 2 6 Acceotance of Public Streets into the Cit~/-Maintained Street System - Tract 20848 (located southwesterly of Nicolas Road at Via Lobo) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- .. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 20848) Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System - Tracts 21674-3 and 21674-F (located southwesterly of the intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 21674-3 AND 21674-F) Release of Monument Bond in Tract No. 21674-F (located southwesterly of the intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Authorize the release of the Subdivision Monument bond in Tract No. 21674oF. 7.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer. Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets. 3 R:~t~eree%121296 9 Western Bypass Assessment District 95-1 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE ACQUISITIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WESTERN BYPASS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1 9.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO 10 Bids for Walcott Corridor Project PW 94-10 RECOMMENDATION: 10. 1 Reject all bids and authorize staff to re-advertise the Walcott Corridor Project upon acquisition of the necessary right-of-way. 10.2 Authorize the City Clerk to return bid bonds to all bidders. 11 Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of Plans and Specifications for Traffic Siqnal Installation at Mamarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79(S) - Project PW95-15. RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW95-15, Traffic Signal installation at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR- 79(S) upon receipt of Caltrans approval. R:~Agendzl\ 121285 4 12 Coooerative Agreement for Fundina Traffic Sianal - Intersection of Maraarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and State Route 79 (S)- Project No. PW95-15 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH FUNDING FOR INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA ROADIREDHAWK PARKWAY AND SR-79(S) 13 Completion and Acceotance of the Moraaa Road Street Widenino - Proiect PW92-10 RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Moraga Road Street Widening, Project No. PW92-10 as complete and direct the City Clerk to: 13.1 File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract. 13.2 Release the MaterialS' and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. 14 Professional Services Aareement for Geotechnical Observation and Testing for Project No. PW95-09. Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84. RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers for Geotechnical Observation and Testing for Project No. PW95-09, Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84 for an amount not to exceed $33,649.00. 14.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING, OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY R:~,Oendm\12129G 6 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: President Ronald H. Roberrs DIRECTORS: Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 95-01 Resolution: No. CSD 95-07 Lindemans, Birdsall, Parks,. Stone, Roberrs PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 28, 1995. DISTRICT BUSINESS 2. Election of Officers for 1996 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Entertain motions to elect a President to preside until the end of calendar year 1996. 2.2 Entertain motions to elect a Vice President to preside until the end of calendar year 1996. R:~gende~121296 6 GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT- Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: December 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~a~Oenda\l 21296 7 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING E::." '... CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Chairperson I:ionald J. Parks presiding AGENCY MEMBERS: Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 95-01 Resolution: No. RDA 95-08 Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. AGENCY BUSINESS 1. Advanced Chemill Systems Owner Participation Aareement RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ADVANCED CHEMILL SYSTEMS, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION R:'~a, gende\121296 8 2. Election of Officers for 1996 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Entertain motions from the Agency Members to elect a Chairman to preside unti| the end of calendar year 1996. 2.2 Entertain motions from the Agency Members to elect a Vice-Chairman to preside until the end of calendar year 1996. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Professional HosPital SUODIV Owner Particioation Aareement (Continued from the Meeting of November 28, 1995) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Continue the public hearing to the meeting of December 19, 1995. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: December 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:%Aeend.e%121296 9 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Next in O~der: Resolution No.: No. FA 95-06 CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall ROLL CALL: Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to.speak, please come forward and state your name and address. I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 28, 1995. PUBLIC HEARING e Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. Financing for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bvoass Corridor (Continued from the meeting of November 2'8, 1995) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO COMPLEXITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC HEARINGS R:'~,genda~,l 21296 10 2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS · WITH RESPECT TO COMPLEXITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC HEARINGS AUTHORITY BUSINESS 3. Election of Officers for 1996 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Entertain motions to elect a President and Vice President to preside over the Financing Authority for calendar year 1996. ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: December 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. 296 11 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENTS President Patricia H. Birdsall Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda a pink "Request To Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 28, 1995. 2. Election of Officers RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Entertain motions to elect a President and Vice President of the Improvement Authority to preside until the and of calendar year 1996. ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: December 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:Vqler, da\l 21296 12 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS 15 Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. ReQuest to Desiqnate Certain Private Prooertv as "No Skateboardina, Rollerbladinq or Similar Activity Area" RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING PRIVATE PROPERTY AT 42690 MARGARITA ROAD AS A "NO SKATEBOARDING, ROLLERBLADING OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY AREA" PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 10,236 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE 16 Adoption of the 1994 Editions of Various Model Buildina Codes RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Open the Public Hearing, receive comments from the public, if any, and continue the public hearing to December 9, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of hearing testimony for or against the adoption of Ordinance No. 95- and on findings to be adopted in connection therewith. 16.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04 AND 15.08 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR FEES AND ENFORCEMENT OF BUILDING REGULATIONS; AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04 AND 15.08 OF THIS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM SWIMMING POOLS, SPAS AND HOT TUB CODE; AND THE 1993 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE R:~.AOenda\121296 13 17 Adootion of the 1994 Edition of The Uniform Fire Code RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Open the Public Hearing, receive comments from the public, if any, and continue the public hearing to December 9, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of hearing testimony for or against the adoption of Ordinance No. 95--- and on the findings to be adopted in connection therewith. 17.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1994 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS, 1994 EDITION. COUNCIL BUSINESS 18 Election of City Council Officers for 1996 RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to elect the Mayor to preside until the end of calendar year 1996. 18.2 Entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to elect the Mayor-Pro Tem to preside until the end of calendar year 1996. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: December 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~Agende%121296 14 PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Greater Temecula area and southwest Riverside County has been fortunate to have benefitted from the services of a special citizen for over a decade; and WHEREAS, Lt. Col. Donald T. Rohrabacher (USMC Pet.) has served his community and his nation as a fighter pilot in the U.S. Marine Corps from 1939 to 1964, serving with distinction in World War II, the Korean War and in Viet Nam; and WHEREAS, he was elected to serve on the Mt. San Jacinto Community College District Board of Trustees in November of 1990 and he served on the Mt. San Jacinto Foundation Board of Directors for five years prior to that time; and WHEREAS, through his efforts in securing the financing and acquisition of property, his 'great American Dream' of a college campus for this area was realized; and WHEREAS the Menifee Campus of Mt. San Jacinto Community College came into being in 1993 and currently has the operating capacity to serve 6,000 students; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jeffrey E. Stone, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim December 12, 1995 to be, "Don Rohrabacher Day* IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 12th day of December, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXtlIRIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~ DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of $1,083,826.71 Section 2. The City Clerk shah certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADO~, this 12th day of December, 1995. ATFEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk [SEAL] Resoo\88 ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMFfULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 12th day of December, 1995 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CO~CII,MEMBERS: CO~CILMEMBERS: CO~CILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk R~os~88 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 11/30/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/12/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 11/30/95 TOTAL PAYROLL: 157,275.56 803,187.71 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 12/12/95 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL $ 725,819.92 1 oo GAS TAX 27,371.06 110 RANCHO CALIF ROAD REIMB DIST 0.00 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 0.00 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 0.00 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 148.18 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 55,655.03 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 1,050.73 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 237.84 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 24,005.53 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 183.26 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 31,267.65 220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST. 0.00 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 0.00 280 RDA-CIP 42,382.72 300 INSURANCE 274.96 310 VEHICLES 0.00 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 37,733.27 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 909.79 340 FACILITIES 13,333.33 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 0.00 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE 0.00 PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL $ 75,071.03 100 GAS TAX 16,217.17 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 490.74 190 TCSD 20,753.17 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 529.67 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 693.90 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,244.75 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 398.65 280 RDA-CIP 2,045.81 300 INSURANCE 552.18 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,527.78 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 637.59 340 FACILITIES 2,201.00 TOTAL BY FUND: RONALD E. B~L~. CI~ MANAGER ' ~ $ 1,083,826.71 $ 960,463.27 123,363.44 $ 1,083,826.71 FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 PAGE 10 11/30/95 16:03 CiTY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/NO0 SET ASIDE 190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP 300 iNSURANCE FUND 3ZO ]NFORNAT]ON SYSTENS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL ANOUNT 61,133.24 18,967,54 148,18 23,823.45 235.15 237.84 5,426.20 183.26 10,450.47 17,166.85 274.96 4,985.30 909.79 13,333,33 157,275.56 VOUCHRE2 '95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26454 26455 26456 26457 26458 26459 26460 26461 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 r~S3 S 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 502553 525622 525622 525622 525622 525622 525622 f 16:03 CHECK DATE 11/17/95 11/21/95' 11/21/95 11/21/95 11/21/95 11/21/95 11/22/95 11/27/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 VENDOR NUMBER 002123 000523 000523 000374 000268 001353 000321 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000Z83 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 VENDOR NAME BROiJN, CHUDLE I GH, SCHULER EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER EASTERN'MUNICIPAL i,/ATER SOUTHERN CALl F EDISON RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT NATIONAL INFONRATION DA SEAR, ROEBUCK AND CONPA UBNOSKE, DEBBIE FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX CIRS) FIRSTAX CIRS) FIRSTAX (]RS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS), FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION APPRAISAL-OLD TOIIN ENTER PRJT INSTALL SEMER a SAM HICKS PRK ENG & INSPECT RANCHO SPT PRK INSTALL ELECT FACt SAM HICKS K-RAT FEES FOR OCT 1995 NATIONAL ZIP CODE DIRECTORY 96 REPLACE OLD VACUIJN-CITY HALL CASH AD/LEAGUE CITZES/UBNOSKE 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028] FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028.:3 FEDERAL 00028.$ FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028] FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028] FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 NEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 00028] MEDICARE 00028.:3 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 00028,$ NEDICARE 000283 NED]CARE 000~83 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000~ SDI 00044~+ SDI 000444 SDI 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE ACCOUNT NUNBER 280-2645 280-199-805-5802 210-190-137-5802 280-199-805-5802 001-2300 001-120-999-5228 340-199-999-5242 001-161-502-5258 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 ITEM AMOUNT 11,000.00 120.00 500.00 1,596.64 10,315.50 46.90 351.21 300.00 11,961.54 2,738.17 36.93 2,817.47 75.63 82.92 389.42 76.68 224.77 113.Tr 397.96 94.32 147.26 2,662.70 590.63 15.91 714.34 18.19 23.16 81.09 14.48 69.34 20.58 54.42 21.14 69.64 47.86 10.12 44.65 6.38 8.89 3,216.56 713.81 12.57 PAGE 1 CHECK ANOUNT 11,000.00 120.00 500.00 1,5~6.64 10,315.50 46.90 351.21 300.00 23,512.46 VOUCHRE2 11/30/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 525622 525622 525622 525622 525622 525622 525622 525622 525622 525622 26464 26465 26466 26466 26467 26468 26469 26470 26471 26472 26473 26474 26475 26475 26476 264T7 26477 26478 2647~ 2647~ 26479 26479 26480 16:03 CITY OF~TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/]0/95 11/]0/95 11/30/95 11/]0/95 11/]0/95 11/30/95 11/]0/95 11/]0/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/]0/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/]0/95 000444 0004~+4 000444 000444 000~4 000444 0004~.4 000444 0004~+4 000444 002001 001910 000370 000370 001237 000398 000152 001590 000135 000135 000138 000138 002036 002036 002036 002036 000146 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE 190-2070 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~ STATE 191-2070 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE 192-2070 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/~ STATE 193-2070 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~ STATE 194-2070 FIRSTAX CEDD) 000/~4 STATE 280-2070 FIRSTAX (EDD) O004Je4 STATE 300-2070 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~4 STATE 320-2070 FIRSTAX (EDD) O00~z~ STATE 330-2070 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~+4 STATE 340-2070 ALCO CAPITAL RESOURCES AMERITECH COMMUNICATION BIRDSALL, PATRICIA BIRDSALL, PATRIEIA BUCKLES, THERESE CPRS CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECR CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPHEN CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALVERY CHAPEL OF NURRI CAREY, NANCY CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CHASE MDC INC CITICORP NORTH AMERICA CITICORP NORTH AMERICA CITY OF HEMET CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH COUNTS UNLIMITED 11/30/95 SHARP COPIER LEASE-FIRE STATIO 001-171-999-57_59 SERV AGREEMENT-RICOH COPIER 330-199-999-5217 LEAGE OF CITIES-10/20-10/25 EMPLOYEE PAID EXPENSE 001-100-999-5258 001-1170 REISSUE CK/REFUND-TCSD CLASS 190-183-4982 MEMBERSHIP: P RUSE 190-180-999-5226 MEMBERSHIP:'G ROBERTS/96 MEMBERSHIP:S NELSON RDA CONF:S.NELSON:l/22-26/96 001-140-999-5226 190-180-999-5226 190-180-999-526i STORM WTR PERMIT/PW-95-09 210-190-626-5804 REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT · REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION TEMPORARY "NO PARKING" SIGNS TAX 190-2900 190-18]-4982 190-180-999-5244 190-180-999-524~ REFUND:OVERPAYMENT BID PACKAGE 001-199-4060 LEASE PMT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM 320-199-999-5391 LEASE PMT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM ]20-2800 CONF:STONE:R ROBERTS/12/7/95 001-100-999-5258 REPROGRAPHIC SRVCS/C]TY HALL REPROGRAPHICS SRVCS/CITY HALL REPROGRAPHIC SRVCS/C]TY HALL REPROGRAPHIC SRVCS/C1TY HALL 210-199-650-5804 210-199-650-5804 210-199-650-5804 210-199-650-580~ TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRAM 95-96 100-164-602-5406 I TEM AMOUNT 675.39 12.87 10.54 91.02 16.70 44.14 33.32 99.17 15.12 17.88 552.73 217.18 192.01 10.95- 15.00 130.00 100.00 130.00 685.00 250,00 100.00 30. O0 80. O0 6.20 30. O0 1 ,Z~9.Z] 57. O0 8.15 8.15 8.15 28.45 800, O0 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 5,076.99 552.73 217.18 181.06 ,. 15.00 130.00 1{ 13o.oo 685.00 250.00 100.00 30.00 86.20 30.00 1,427.57 57.00 52.90 80~-aO VOUCHRE2 16:03 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26481 26482 26482 26483 26484 26484 26485 26486 26487 26488 26489 26490 =~,90 ,90 26491 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 26492 CHECK DATE 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 VENDOR NUMBER 001233 001233 000155 001669 001669 002113 000754 002125 001056 000165 000165 000165 000165 001135 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000993 VENDOR NAME D F M ASSOCIATES DAN'S FEED & SEED, iNC. DAN'S FEED & SEED, ZNC, DAVLIN DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATiO DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO EDBORGS CUSTOM FENCING ELLIOTT GROUP, THE EMERGENCY PET CLINIC ENDLESS CREATIONS EXCEL LANDSCAPE FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, ]NC, FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANYw FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANYw FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. ITEM DESCRIPTION ~96 CALIF ELECTIONS COOE BOOKS PROPANE GAS SUPPLY PROPANE GAS SUPPLY BROADCASTING OF COUNCIL MTGS. RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT FENCE REPAIR FOR THE VILLAGES LDSCP INSPECTION SERVS VET SERVS FOR K-9/POLICE DOG DECORATIONS-CITY HALL CEREMONY RCHO VISTA SPT PRK REPAIRS EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL COSTS .MONTICELLO FILLER-JAN 96 STORAGE BINDER CLASSIC FILLER-REFILL JAN96 BLK ZIPPER BINDER CLASSIC FILLER SHEET PROTECTOR NAVY CLASSIC BINDER CLASSIC MASTER FILLER CARD POUCH ZIPPER BINDER ~/i4R]ST STRAP SEASONS MASTER FILLER ZIPPER POUCH NAVY BINDER FILLER POUCH SHEET PROTECTOR FRE i GHT TAX FRANKLIN REFILLS 96 FRANKLIN REFILLS 96 FREIGHT TAX BEVERAGE SERVICE - CITY HALL ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-120-999-5228 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 001-100-999-5250 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5250 001-170-999-5294 001-150-999-5265 190-180-999-5415 001-140-999-5230 001-161-502-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-150-999-5248 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 340-199-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 35.00 5.06 5.28 800,00 104.73 113.04 175.00 225.00 25.00 80.00 594.91 39.87 23.81 9.50 37.47 90.00 27.50 7.50 20.95 65. O0 26.95 3.00' 65. O0 26.95 1.95 65.00 33.50 1.95 65.00 33.50 1.95 3.00 9.00 35.47 33.50 107.80 9.50 11.69 135.89 CHECK AMOUNT 35.00 10.34 800.00 217.77 175.00 225.00 25.00 80.00 594.91 110.65 90,00 655.66 135.89 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 11/30/95 16:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER]OUS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 26~94 11/30/95 001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS 26~94 11/30/95 001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS GRIT SAND FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 100-16~-601-5218 TAX 100-16~-601-5218 90.00 6.98 96.98 26~95 11/30/95 00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-181-11Z3/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 26~95 11/30/95 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN RE-ISSUE CK 25749 320-199-999-5208 26~95 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-693*0956/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-4354 PALA COHN PRK 320-199-999-5208 26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-4356 K.H. MEN PRK 320-199-999-5208 26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-694-1993/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 26495 11/]0/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-694-4353/PALA PARK 320-199-999-5208 26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-695-3564/ALARM 320-199-999-5208 26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-8632 GEN USAGE 320-199-999-5208 26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-2475/PUBLIC WORKS 100-164-601-5208 26495 11/30/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-7945/CRC FIRE ALARN 320-199-999-5208 543.32 207.41 31.87 28.84 29.32 1,191.38 28.84 60.78 31.79 39,05 60.50 2,253.10 26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 26496 11/30/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 26497 11/30/95 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO ERGONONIC KEYBOARD 320-199-999-5221 26498 11/30/95 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH LOGO FOR AWARDS PRESENTATION 190-180-999-5222 26498 11/30/95 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH- TAX 190-180-999-5222 127.34 12.90 671.12 46.07 45.79 52.41- 150.46 90.00 6.98 850.81 96.98 26499 11/30/95 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, ALARM MONITORING - CITY HALL 340-199-999-5250 35.00 35.00 26500 11/30/95 001343 HC~/E WELDING & FABRICAT FABRICATION TO STENCIL TRUCK 100-164-601-5215 186.66 26501 11/30/95 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212 182.10 182.10 26502 11/30/95 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS SARN 001-2140 1~4.51 26502 11/30/95 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS CARN 100-2140 144.51 289.02 26503 11/30/95 001652 JERRY KELLETT PAINTING PAINTING SERVICES FOR C.R.C. 26503 11/30/95 001652 JERRY KELLETT PAINTING SEAL SOUTH GYM WALL 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 120.00 300.00 420.00 26504 11/30/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP WE 11/12 EVANS 001-165-999-5118 26504 11/30/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP WE 11/12 EVANS 001-165-999-5118 26504 11/30/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP WE 11/12 EVANS 100-164-604-5118 26504 11/30/95 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP WE 11/12 LUJAN 190-180-999-5118 72.80 72.80 72.80 353.60 572.00 26505 11/30/95 001036 KENPER REAL ESTATE NANA REISSUE/REIMB.1/2 OF UTILITIES 190-180-999-5240 970.19 970.19 26506 11/30/95 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I STATIONERY OFFICE SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 26506 11/30/95 000206 KINKOrS OF RIVERSIDE, ] NlSC COPY SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 26506 11/30/95 000206 KINKO~S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC COPY SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 26507 11/30/95 LEE, MICHAEL REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 190-18.3-4982 24.24 14.57 22.90 40.00 61.71 VOUCHRE2 ' 195 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26508 26508 26508 26508 26508 26509 26510 26510 26510 26510 26511 26512 26513 26513 26514 "~14 ~14 26514 26515 26515 26515 26515 26515 26515 26515 26515 26516 26516 26517 26517 26518 26519 26519 26519 26519 26519 26520 16:03 CHECK DATE 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 VENDOR NUMBER 001513 001513 001513 001513 001513 001891 000414 000414 000414 000414 000653 000214 001967 001967 000220 000220 000220 000220 000220 00138/, 001384 001384 00138~ 001384 001384 00138~ 00138~ 001892 001892 000883 000883 002101 001584 001584 001584 001584 001584 002105 002105 VENDOR NAME LIBERTY AUTO CENTER LIBERTY AUTO CENTER LIBERTY AUTO CENTER LIBERTY AUTO CENTER LIBERTY AUTO CENTER LINFIELD SCHOOL LONGS DRUG STORE LONGS DRUG STORE LONGS DRUG STORE LONGS DRUG STORE LUCKY STORE, INC. LUNCH & STUFF CATERING NANPOf. IER TEMPORARY SERV MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. NAURICE PRINTERS, ]NC. NAURICE PRINTERS, INC. MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. MINUTEMAN PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS MOBILE MOOULAR MOBILE MODULAR MORTELEORE EXCAVATING MONTELEORE EXCAVATING MY BUDDIES PIZZA NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT TCSD VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT-TCSD VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE VEHICLE REPAIRS & NA]NT-TCSD VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT-TCSD INTERIM FIRE STATION - RENT FILM PURCHASE AND PROCESSING FILM PURCHASE AND PROCESSING FILM PURCHASE AND PROCESSING FILM PURCHASE AND PROCESSING TCSD CLASS SUPPLIES COUNCIL MEETING 11/28 TEMP HELP W/E 11/12 LIPOSCHAK TEMP HELP W/E 11/19 LIPOSCHAK COIqP ANNUAL FISCAL REPT COVERS CLEAR CONBS/CAFR TAX PRESS RELEASE LETTERHEAD TAX BUSINESS CARDS BUSINESS CARDS TAX TAX BUSINESS CARDS-J. BARRON TAX BUSINESS CARDS-POLICE DEPT TAX SEPT LEASE PNT-INTER]N FIRE TAX DESILTING DANS-CALLE DE VELARD REMOVAL OF DIRT ~ NEW CITY HAL REFRESHMENT:CITY HALL CEREMONY TAX FORMS/W-2 WINDOW ENVELOPES TAX FORMS/1099 FREIGHT TAX VEHICLE NAINT. & REPAIR VEHICLE MA]NT. & REPAIR ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 001-171-999-5470 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-183-999-5320 001-100-999-5260 100-164-601-5118 100-164-601-5118 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 280-199-999-5264 280-199-999-5264 100-164-604-5222 190-180-999-5222 100-164-604-5222 190-180-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 001-170-999-5222 001-170-999-5222 001-171-999-5470 001-171-999-5470 100-164-601-5401 210-190-1/,4-5804 001-150-999-5265 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-9~9-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 100-164-601-5214 100-164-601'-5214 ITEM AMOUNT 48.50 66.33 164.28 15.58 232.52 600.00 8.93 8.93 8.93 11 30.00 80.00 634.40 594,75 583. O0 44.00 48.59 ?3.00 5.66 76.50 38.25 5.92 2.96 102.50 7.94 76.50 5.92 685. O0 53.09 7,700.00 9,200.00 290.00 81.74 29.35 36.41 10.00 11.43 12,00 35.00 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 527.21 600.00 38.43 30.00 80.00 1,229.15 754.25 316.49 738,09 16,900.00 290.00 168.93 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 11/30/95 16:03 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOO$ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26520 26520 26520 26520 26521 26522 26522 26522 26523 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26524 26525 26526 26526 26526 26526 26526 26526 26526 CHECK DATE 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 VENDOR NUMBER 002105 002105 002105 002105 002088 000239 000239 000239 000635 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 001958 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 VENDOR NAME OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVXCE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TYPEWRITER OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE PARTY PALACE, THE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEESr RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RET]RE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEESr RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RET]RE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ITEM DESCRIPTION VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR VEHICLE NAINT, & REPAIR REPAIR TYPEWRITER IN CSD TEMP HELP W/E 10/22 GRAGE TEMP HELP W/E 10/22 GRAGE TENP HELP W/E 10/22 GRAGE PARTY SUPPLIES:CITY HALL CEREN 000246 PER REDE 000246 PER REDE 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET OOO266 PERS RET OOO266 PERS RET 000266 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET OOO246 PERS RET . OOO246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 001958 PERS L-T PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-163-999-5214 100-164-601-5214 001-163-999-5214 100-164-601-5214 190-180-999-5242 001-162-999-5118 001-161-501-5118 001-161-502-5118 001-150-999-5265 001-2130 100-2130 001-2390 100-2390 165-2~90 190-2390 191-2190 192-2190 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2390 100-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-Z390 320-2390 330-2]90 340-2390 100-2122 001-150-999-5260 210-199-650-5806 210-199-650-580~ 001-110-999-5258 001-162-999-5262 100-164-604-5260 001-161-502-5260 ITEM AMOUNT 15.95 164.19 126.19 25.00 184.30 151.20 97.20 97.20 185.19 191.61 65.19 13,058.92 2,483.17 82.54 2,983.11 94.44 120.29 324.86 75.17 226.21 106.83 282.54 109.7'5 349.87 50.20 10.60 .23 12.60 .47 .93 1.39 .23 .78 .46 .93 .93 2.09 51.70 13.76 24.14 27.43 35.00 11.00 4.50 6.00 CHECK AMOUNT 378.33 184.30 345.60 185.19 20,636.32 51.70 VOUCHRE2 16:03 C]TY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26526 26526 26526 26526 26527 26527 26528 26528 26528 26528 26529 26530 26531 J2 26532 26533 26534 26534 26534 26534 26534 26535 26535 26535 26535 26535 26536 26536 26536 26537 26537 26537 26537 CHECK DATE 11/30/95 11/30/95 11130195 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11130/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 VENDOR NUMBER 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000580 000580 000253 000253 000253 000253 0012~4 000255 000728 000947 000947 000947 000262 000262 000907 000907 000907 000907 000907 000426 000426 000426 000426 000426 001680 001680 001680 OOO266 000266 000266 000266 000266 000266 VENDOR NAME PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PHOTO IdORKS PHOTO MORKS POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER PRICE COSTCO, INC. PRO LOCK.& KEY RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANCHO ]NDUSTR]AL SUPPL RAY GRAGE AND ASSOCIATE RAY GRAGE AND ASSOCIATE RAY GRAGE AND ASSOCIATE RIGHTMAY RIGHTMAY RIGHTMAY RIGHTMAY RIGHTMAY RIGHTWAY ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH RE]MBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT FILM, SLIDES AND PICTURES FILM, SLIDES AND PICTURES EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS REFRESHMENT:CITY HALL CEREMONY TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVS/JANiTONS REP/TEST BACKFLOt,/PREV DEVICES BLUEPRINTS REPOGRAPHICS BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION BLUEPRINTS REPOGRAPHICS VARIOUS WATER SERVS .VARIOUS WATER SERVS VEHICLE MAINT & DETAIL VEHICLE MAINT & DETAIL VEHICLE MAINT & DETAIL VEHICLE MAINT & DETAIL VEHICLE MAINT & DETAZL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL INDOSTRIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS OCT PROF PLAN CK SERVS OCT PROF. PLAN CK SERVS OCT PROF PLAN CK SERVS PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL-PRKS PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL-PRKS PORTABLE TO]LET RENTAL-PRKS PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL-PRKS PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL-PRKS PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL-PRKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-199-999-5260 001-110-999-5260 001-150-999-5250 001-162-999-5260 001-162-~-5242 001-100-999-5258 001-100-~99-5258 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 001-161-501-5230 001-161-502-5230 100-164-604-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-150-999-5265 340-199-~99-5212 190-180-~9-5212 001-1280 280-199-805-5802 330-199-999-5220 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 001-165-9~9-5214 001-163-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 190-180-~-5263 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 340-199-999-5212 340-199-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 ITEM AMOUNT 40.67 29.00 15.47 22.00 29.21 31.80 23.85 11.52 15.01 34,38 34.37 15.00 19.40 150.00 155.70 30.00 9.06 282.74 21.55 1,2~4.65 4,084.16 4.00 23.22 24.00 98.62' 24.00 46.55 54.78 69.81 166.22 ~6.55 2,342.85 1,602.97- 641.60- 62.89 125.78 62.89 251.55 386,88 50.39 CHECK AMOUNT 313.83 26.53 103.15 150.00 155.70 30.00 313,35 5,328.81 173.84 383.91 98.28 940.38 VOUCHRE2 PAGE__8 11/30/95 16:03 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26538 26538 26539 26540 26540 26541 26542 26542 26542 26542 26542 26542 26542 26543 26543 26544 26545 26545 26545 26545 26545 26546 26546 26546 26547 26548 26549 26550 26551 26551 26552 26553 26553 26554 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 11/30/95 11130195 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 000678 000678 RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE 000406 RIVERS]DE CO. SHERIFF'S 000271 ROBERT BEIN, t4N FROST & 000271 ROBERT BE]N, WH FROST & RODRIGUEZ, LANETTE 000704 000704 000704 0007{)4 000704 000704 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL 000793 SCANTRON CORPORATION 000793 SCANTRON CORPORATION 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000375 000375'5 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000282 SOUTHERN CALIF. MUNICIP SPAGNOLO, DON 00029-1 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T 001972 STANLEY R, HOFFMAN ASSO 000752 STONE, JEFFREY E. 000752 STONE, JEFFREY E. 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO, 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. 002104 TEMEKU GOLF COURSE CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION JUL/SEPT VECTOR CONTROL- HAZ MAT PERMIT FOR CRC TRAINING FOR K-9/POLICE DOG OCT PROF SERVS/MALOBTT CORRIDO OCT PROF SERVS/MALCOTT CORRIDO REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES SCANTRON F~RMS/PUBLIC t~ORKS CREDIT:OVERCHARGED FOR FORMS SIERRA PROGRAMMING/ASSISTANCE 2-02-351-4946 ST LIGHT ELECT S 2-02-351-5281RANCHO VISTA A 2-02-351-5489/FRONT ST 2-02-351-6685 YNEZ RD PEO 2-02-351-rr90 RANCHO VISTA SPR 909 202-3800N~ 909 202-3800 I~ 909 202-4752 SN DUES FOR:LA,JC,SJ,JV, JL,HP REIMB:UNITED WAY RECOGNITION REPAIR & MAINT CITY VEHICLES FISCAL ANALYSIS STUDY LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/31-24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/31-24 LETTERS FOR P.ZUNA NAME PLATE BRONZE PLAQUE - VOORBURG PARK TAX CHAIRS & MISC SUPPLIES RENTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 001-170-999-5327 210-165-637-5802 210-165-637-5802 190-183-4982 100-164-601-5263 001-163-999-5263 001-165-999-5263 001-110-999-526S 001-162-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 001-170-999-5262 001-163-999-5222 001-163-999-5222 320-199-999-5250 190-181-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 100-16~-601-5240 191-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5226 001-150-999-5265 190-180-999-5214 001-161-502-5248 001-100-999-5258 001-1170 001-162-999-5220 190-180-999-5244 190-180-999-5244 001-21T2 ITEM AMOUNT 112.50 408.00 600.00 4,484.00- 4,~0.00 30.00 402.91 137.72 40.26 56.32 85.66 256.19 56.60 547.80 48.20- 317.53 724.87 5,359.14 116.89 15.95 17.60 197.72 139.25 94.36 150.00 76.00 20.99 494.91 30.50 3.00- 29.94 5 75. O0 ~4.56 511.81 CHECK AMOUNT 520.50 600.00 396.00 30.00 1,035.66 . 499.60 6,234.45 431.33 .150.00 76.00 20.99 494.91 27.50 29.94 619,56 51't-.41 VOUCHRE2 ~95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26555 26556 26556 26556 26557 26558 26558 26558 26558 26558 26559 26559 26559 26559 26559 26559 26559 9 26559 26560 26561 26561 26562 26563 2656~ 26565 26566 2656? 26568 26568 16:03 CHECK DATE 11130/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 11/30/95 VENDOR NUMBER 000320 000320 000320 000826 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 001112 000524 000524 001209 001437 000339 000621 001601 001939 002092 002092 VENDOR NAME THOMAS, CHARLES E TOt,/NE CENTER STATIONERS TOI~NE CENTER STATIONERS TOI4NE CENTER STATIONERS TRAVEL TRUST CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND:ELECT PERHIT B95-188~ OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FY95-96 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIP OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIP AIRFARE:STONE: R ROBERTS/NLC U S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M/PEBSCO (ONRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RET]R UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNI VAN TECH ENGINEERING, I VAN TECH ENGINEERING, I VAULT INC., THE VIRACK, MARYANN WEST PUBLISHING CC~PANY WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNC WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES WINDSOR PROJECTS, INC. WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH UNIFORM HAINT/PUBLZC t4ORKS UNIFORMS FOR PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM NAINT/PUBLIC MORKS UNIFORM NA]NT. FOR TCSD UNIFORM PAINT. FOR TCSD UNIFORM PAINT. FOR TCSD FLOOR PATS RENTAL-CITY HALL FLOOR PATS RENTAL-CITY HALL FLOOR PAT RENTAL-CRC FLOOR PAT RENTAL AND.CLEANING FLOOR PAT RENTAL a SR CNTER WEED IDENT BOOK FOR PRK MAINT JACKET FOR CIP INSPECTOR TAX OFF-SITE STORAGE .FOR VAULT T~SD INSTRUCTON EARNINGS CA PUB CODES FOR CITY HALL GOV'T MEMBERSHIP FOR FY 95'96 TRAFFIC FORECAST NODEL DEC RENT/NOV CAM-CITY HALL TOURISH FOLDER KIT TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-4285 001-163-999-5220 001-165-999-5220 001-165-999-5220 001-100-999-5258 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 100-164-601-5243 100-164-601-5243 100-164-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 340-199-999-5250 340-199-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 190-180-999-5228 001-165-999-524Z 001-165-999-5242 330-199-999-5277 190:183-999-5330 001-120-999-5228 001-100-999-5226 100-164-603-5248 340-199-999-5234 280-199-999-5264 280-199-999-5264 ITEN AMOUNT 24.00 33.73 48.37 42.59 248.00 358.92 75.90 334.82 47.88 66.68 24.00 25.08 24.00 32.78 19.85 19.85 35.50 35.50 38.40 38.40 25.62 71.50 69.95 5.42 368.11 112.00 46.83 8,500.00 800. O0 11,761.76 3,200.00 248.00 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 24.00 124.69 248.00 884.20 318.98 71.50 75.37 368.11 112.00 46.8~ 8,500.00 800.00 11,761.76 3,~48.00 TOTAL CHECKS 157,275.56 VOUCNREZ PAGE__3 11/30/95 16:55 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CONt4UN]TY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP 320 INFORNATION SYSTENS TOTAL ANOUNT 66~,68&.68 8,403,52 31,831.58 815.58 18,669,33 20,817.18 25,215.87 32,747.97 803,187.71 VOU~CHRE2 '95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26571 26571 26571 26572 26573 26573 26574 26574 26574 26574 26574 26574 26574 26575 26576 26576 26578 26578 26579 26579 26580 26581 26581 26581 26582 26583 26584 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 16:55 CHECK DATE 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95. 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 VENDOR NUMBER 000101, 000104 00010~ 002093 000123 000123 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 001924 001056 001056 000520 001429 001429 000202 000202 002062 000217 000217 000217 001007 001713 000270 000406 000406 000406 0OO4O6 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 VENDOR NAME ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC, BERRYNAN AND HENIGAR BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA DAVID N. GR]FFITH & ASS EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE H D L COREN & CONE, INC INACOR INFORMATION SYST INACON INFORMATION SYST J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES JOHN EGAN & ASSOCIATES, MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS NARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS N P G CORP. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERS]DE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHER]FF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER FOR ALL PERZOOS ]TEN DESCRIPTION ASPHALT FOR POT HOLE REPAIRS FREIGHT TAX PROF SRVCS LEGAL SERVICES RETAINER/SEPT LEGAL SERVICES/SEPT NOV LDSCP HAINT DUCK POND NOV LDSCP NAINT PALA PARK NCN LDSCP N/tINT - PARKS NOV LDSCP NAINT SR CNTER NOV LDSCP NAINT CRC NOV LDSCP NAINT MEDIANS NOV LDSCP NAINT N]COLAS RD PRK SCHOOL MITIGATION FEE STUDY NOV. LDSCP NA]NT-SLOPE AREAS NOV LDSCP NAINT-R,C. SPT PRK PROPERTY TAX CONSULTING SERVS. COMPUTER SERVER/CITY HALL TAX OCT DESIGN SERVS-RANCHO PRK CREDIT:PROF SRVCS SPORTS PARK SEP/OCT WESTERN BYPASS ENG SER ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIALS VOLLEYBALL REFEREE CREDIT:OVERCHARGED VOLLEYBALL RIP RAP AND CONCRETE 1~3RK OCT ENG SERVS-lst ST BRIDGE DESIGN SRVCS/PARKVIEW SITE LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2 LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2 LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2 LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2 LAW ENFONCENENT ENDING AUG 2 LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2 LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2 LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2 LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2 ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 280-2645 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 001-140-999-5248 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 001-140-999-5248 320-1970 320-1970 210-190-137-5802 210-190-137-5802 210-165-612-5802 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 100-164-601-5401 280-199-807-5802 210-190-138-5802 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5290 001-170~999-5291 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5281 ITEM AMOUNT 1,556.80 50.00 120.65 3,915.00 3,150.00 2,145.28 1,445.00 2,336.00 13,547.61 242.52 1,670.81 815.58 1,015.00 2,997.91 18,669.33 7,605.64 4,800.00 30,486.00 2,261.97 3,662.18 2,522.00' 18,377.00 2,475.00 138.60 138.60' 3,361.00 21,300.87 1,300.00 207, 211.53 25,040.92 6,597.36 5,222.18 3,164.84 33,011. O0 9,643.53 16,170.93 17,961.35 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 1,727.45 3,915.00 5,295.28 21,072.52 2,997.91 26,274.97 4,800.00 32,747.97 1,140.18 18,377.00 2,475.00 3,361.00 21,300.87 1,300.00 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2 11/30/95 16:55 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26585 26586 26587 CHECK DATE lZ/12/95 lZ/lZ/95 12/12/95 12112195 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 12/12/95 i2/12/95 12/12/95 VENDOR NUMBER 000/,06 000~.06 000~06 000406 000~06 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000~06 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 002021 002097 VENDOR NAME RIVERSIDE CO. SHERZFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFFS RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHER[FF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHER]FF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRZPTION LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2 LAW ENFORCEMENT ENDING AUG 2 BOOKING FEES/JUL 95 AUTO CR]ME/INFO SYSTM/1QTR 95 AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT AUG 30 LAW ENFORCEMENT OVRCNG FOR FACILITY FEES OVRCHGED FACILITIES INV 10951 NOV RESTROOM NAINT SERVS/PRKS HOT TAPE FOR STORM DRAINS TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1230 001-170-999-5214 001-170-999-5273 001-170-999-5325 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5290 001-170-999-5291 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5281 001-12~0 001-170-999-52~ 001-170-999-5234 001-170-999-5234 190-180-999-5250 100-164-601-5244 ZTEM AMOUNT 5 222.17 10 674.47 8 832.00 9 038.30 18] 820.90 23 129.84 5 644.80 1.023.12 2 844.80 28 950.96 '9 603.20 12,375.39 22,033.87 1,023.12 9,057.13 2,660.78- 1,043.44- 1,494.00 3,315.07 CHECK AMOUNT 651,593.49 1,494.00 3,315.07 803,18,.., ITEM 3 TO:' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF C ..~,~ CITY MANAGER~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance December 12, 1995 City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1995 PREPARED BY: Steve Oakley, Accountant RECOMMENDATION: as of October 31, 1995. That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of October 31, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of October 31,1995 2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of October 31, 1995 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of October 31, 1995 Cash Activity for the Month of October: Cash and Investments as of October 1, 1995 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of October 31, 1995 $ $ 54,984,916 2,394,228 (2,003,493) 55,375,651 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand' Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs Reserve Account-TCSD COPs Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Construction Fund-RDA Bonds Reserve Account-RDA Bonds Institution Yield City Hall First Interstate First Interstate State Treasurer 5.784 ICMA PEBSCO PEBSCO Bank of America 5.426 BOfA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 Bank of America 5.426 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.210 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 Balance 800 159,807 1,624 40,939,090 273,833 396,566 27,125 17,323 502,690 721,873 10,886,000 1,448,920 55,375,651 (1) (1) (1)-This amount is nat of outstanding checks. Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meat budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. City of Temecula Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances As of October 31,1995 Comrnunity Services Redevelopment City (1) District Agency Assets: Cash and investments $ 33,816,487 $ 1,659,887 Receivables 2,938,513 122,300 Due from other funds 551,944 Land held for resale 918, 171 Fixed assets*net 424,895 $ 19,899,277 $ 200,681 2,165,~3 Total assets $ 38,650,010 $ 1,782,1 87 $ 22,265,011 $ Total 55,375,651 3,261,494 551,944 3,021,224 424,895 62,635,208 Liabilities and fund equity: Liabilities: Due to other funds Other liabilities Total liabilities $ 519,144 $ 32,800 $ 6,399,785 $ 183,244 74,313 6,918,929 163,244 107,113 Fund equity: Contributed capital 1,055,344 Retained earnings 111,200 Fund balances: Reserved (2) 3,741,527 953,566 Designated (3) 18,462,656 663,623 Undesignated 8,360,974 (20,246) Total fund equity Total liabilities and fund equity 6,598,154 15,497,744 31,731,081 1,598,943 22,095,898 $ 38,650,010 $ 1,782,1 87 $ 22,265,011 $ 551,944 6,657,342 7,209,286 1,055,344 111,200 11,293,247 34,625,465 8,340,728 55,425,922 62,635,208 (1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and deterred comp agency funds. (2) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iow/mod homing, and debt service. (3) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations. ITEM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer December 12, 1995 Release Labor and Material Security in Parcel Map No. 22629 PREPARED BY:/~'-"Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer t~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of the Labor and Material portion of the security for the improvement of streets and drainage in Parcel Map No. 22629, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the Developer. BACKGROUND: On October 22, 1992, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with: Jack B. Koczarski 164 Lounsbury Road Trumbull, CT 06611 for the improvement of street and drainage, and subdivision monumentation in Parcel Map No. · 22629. Securities for these obligations were posted by lien agreement and a grant deed .was granted to the .City for that purpose. The secured amounts were as follows: Street and Drainage Improvements-Faithful Performance Street and Drainage Improvements-Labor and Material Subdivision Monumentation $34,500 17,250 1,210 The grant deed was executed and delivered under the condition that it shall be null and void upon the full and faithful performance of the terms and conditions of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The deed covered both of the pertinent parcels prior to the recordation of Parcel Map No. 22629, Parcel 3 and Lot "C" of Parcel Map No. 9197. -1- r:\agdrpt\95\1212%pm22629.m&l The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved plans: Street and drainage improvements within Parcel Map No. 22629 Survey Monuments within Parcel Map No. 22629 The Public Works Department recommended acceptance of the public improvements. On May 5, 1-995, the City Council accepted the improvements, initiated the one-year warranty period, and authorized reduction in the Faithful Performance security amount to the ten- percent (10%) warranty level as follows: Street and drainage Improvements $3,450 The Warranty period expires May 5, 1996, subject to any repairs/replacements required to restore to public standards. Staff examined the value of the parcels and analyzed release by reconveyance (quitclaim) to the developer of several of the four subdivided parcels. The objective was to retain the minimum number of parcels necessary to assure that the value of land the City holds is sufficient to meet any claims against either the Faithful Performance warranty or Labor and Materials security amount. On August 8, 1995, the City Council authorized the quitclaim of three of the four parcels in Parcel Map 22629 to the developer, and thereby retained Parcel 2 as security for labor and material and faithful performance warranty purposes. The developer was also required to post Labor end Material security to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. This security is maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the public improvements. No claims having been made for labor or materials and the lien period having expired, Public Works Staff recommends release of this portion of the secured amount as follows: Labor and Materials $17,250 The affected streets are not being accepted into the City maintained street system at this time. The streets within the' subdivision are portions of Via Telesio and Green Tree Road. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Location Map -2- r:~agdrpt\95t, 1212~pm22629.m&l EXttlBIT "B" PARCEL MAP NO. 22629 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer December 12, 1995 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tract No. 20848) (Southwesterly of Nicolas Road at Via Lobo) PREPARED BY:/~/'Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer ,~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-_, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 20848) BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 20848 on August 18, 1987, .and entered into subdivision agreements with Radnor/Sunland/Green Meadows Partnership for street, water and sewer improvements. On March 7, 1990, the County of Riverside accepted the improvements, reduced the faithful performance bonds for warranty purposes, and initiated the warranty period. The City Council released. the Subdivision Monumentation bond on December 11, 1990, the Labor and Material and Faithful Performance Warranty bonds on August 25, 1992. The public streets recommended for acceptance are Deer Meadow Road, Armore Court, Tuolumne Court, Vidette Circle, Benwood Court, Donomore Court, Holden Circle, and portions of Via Lobo, and North General Kearny ROad. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. Attachments: Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. r:\agdrpt~95\1212\tr20848m.sts RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INT0 THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 20848) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted an offer of dedication of certain lots for public road and public utility purposes made by Radnor/Sunland/Green Meadows Partnership with the recordation of Tract Map No. 20848; and, WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted the improvements within Tract No. 20848 as complete on March 7, 1990. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] r:~agdrpt~95\l 212~tr20848m.sts STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: r:\agdrpt\95\ 1212~tr20848m.sts EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated on Tract Map No. 20848, and accepting subject public streets into the City Msintnined- Street System as described below: Those lots described as Lots was through "K" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 20848, f'ded 31 August 1987, in Book 172 of Maps, Pgs 67-72 Incl., further described as follows: (Lots 'A" & (Lot "C") (Lot "D") (Lot "E") (Lot "F") (Lot "G") (Lot "H") (Lots "I" & "J") (Lot "K") Portion of North General Kearny Road Deer Meadow Road Atmore Court Tuolomne Court Vidette Circle Benw0od Court Donomore Court Holden Circle Portion of Via Lobo r:~agdrpt\95\l 212\tr20848m.sts EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED- STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: L LEGEND STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS TO BE ACCEFFED I~TO CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM Y~lNrr_y MAp_, "'~' hYS'f . /:z04 93 P4qT / / ' / tlO' / ',~:,,.,' · 1 : . ./ TR A C T A~. 2 0848 rl'EM 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL RY~ CITY ATTORNEY .. FINANCE DIREC CITY OF TEMECL I~CITY MANAGE AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer December 12, 1995 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tracts No. 21674-3 and 21674-F). (Southwesterly of the intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway) PREPARED BY://4~ Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer /,~'Albert Ko Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 21674-3 AND 21674-F) BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tracts No. 21674-3and 21674oF on January 9, 1990, and entered into Subdivision Agreements for construction of street, water and sewer improvements with Mesa Homes (Now Kemper Real Estate Development Company). Through previous City Council action the improvements for these two tracts have been accepted and all improvement, warranty, and monumentation securities released. The public streets now being accepted by this action are Corte Encinas and portions of Paseo De Las Olas in Tract No. 21674-3, and Corte Salinas in Tract No. 21674-F. Portions of Meadow Parkway in Tract No. 21674-3 will not be accepted until the work performed under Assessment District No. 159 and Community Facilities District No. 88-3 are completed and accepted by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. Attachments: Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. r:\agdrpt\95%1212\tr21674f.mst RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO ~ CITY MAINTAINEI)-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 21674-3 AND 21674-F) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted offer of dedication of certain lots for public road and public utility purposes made by Mesa Homes (Now Kernper Community Development Company), with the recordation of Tract Maps No. 21674-3 and 21674-F; and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tract No 21674-3 on April 26, 1994, and the improvements within Tract No. 21674-F on December 17, 1991. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those sweets or portions of sweets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk r:%egdrpt%95\1212~tr21674f.mst [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMENIBERS: COUNCILNIF~MBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: r:\agdrpt\95X1212\tr21674f.mst EXIIIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95. Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as inflated on Tract Maps No. 21674-3 and 21674-F, and accepting subject public streets into the City Maintained- Street System as described below: A. Those lots described as Lots w A" through "C" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 21674-3, fled 12 January 1990, in Book 211 of Maps, Pgs 95-98 Ind., further described as follows: Parkway Las Olas (Lot "A")* (Lot "B") (Lot Portion of Meadows Portion of Paseo De Corte Encinas B. That lot described as Lot 'A" as shown on Tract Map No. 21674-F, ~ed 12 January 1990, in Book 211 of Maps, Pgs 99- 102 Incl., further described as follows: (Lot "A") Corte Salinas *Not to be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System until the Acceptance of the improvements constructed under Assessment District No. 159 and Comm-nity Facilities District 88-3 is effected. .. r:%egdrpt~95X 1212Xtr21674f.met EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: LEGEND -T'EIE--=TS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS TO BE ACCEPTED INTO CITY- It'tA/NTAINED 5'I'R2ET SYS'I"EM WCINITY MAP NO ,SCALE I'~'EM 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer December 12, 1995 Release the Monument Bond in Tract No. 21674-F. (Southwesterly of intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway) PREPARED BY: ~ Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer  Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City CounCil AUTHORIZE the release of the Subdivision Monument bond in Tract No 21674-F, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved the map for Tract Map No. 21674-F on January 12, 1990,' and Subdivision Agreements and Securities were filed by: Mesa Homes (Now Kemper Community Development Company) 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 202 Temecula, Ca 92591 .Through previous City Council action the improvements for this project have been accepted, Faithful Performance, Labor and Material, and Warranty Bonds have been released. The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of the following Monumentation Bond:' Bond No. 3S 687 488 00 in the amount of $11,500. The affected street is Corte Salinas, which will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution No. 95- FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map -1- r:~agdtpt\95~1212\tr21674f. fin VI[IAIITY M,4P E l>,dNtltO C, ILIFOIIIh4 lOltO """'~' "'~"qo' PEE P.M./if zlll4,, RM. 8. 144/z4 -.IJ (NEW Z..I;II · ' ~.,~, $EO 3 ~ ~ 3 S a T e 9 fo ~L~- ' ........... ~; ~ t~ JJ,~i~ ~l .. ~,, ~,/./,/-/-H- .~-. ', "=~""'~""7,,~,,,, ,,,,, ,- ~"' ~",' ~ P~ ~ .Z& ~ 4 ~ 9 4 ~ ,,' ZZ4~ I ~ 74 37~N' / ~ '- TRACT NO. 21674-F Location Map ITEM 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer December 12, 1995 Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets. BACKGROUND: Due to the current public interest in modifying or controlling traffic within residential neighborhoods, staff has investigated implementing a comprehensive policy to ensure equity and consistency in applying traffic calming strategies. Our research found a model policy that could be adapted to meet the specific needs of the City of Temecula. This model policy was first modified by the Department of Public Works prior to submittal to the Police Department, Fire Department and City Attorney's office for input. All comments were then incorporated and then presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for review and comment. Their recommended changes were also incorporated and then approved. To ensure that none of the Commission's refinements compromises the legality of this policy, the City Attorney's office reviewed the proposed policy and re-confirmed their previous approval. With the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and staff would like to submit this policy, Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow for on Public Streets, for approval as a tool to handle neighborhood traffic safety concerns. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Policy Institute of Transportation Engineer (I.T.E.) Article - Facing up to a Street Closure Epidemic Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda, Item 4 from Meetings of August 25 and September 22, 1994 - 1 - r: Xagdrpt\95 \ 1212 ~stpoli~y. agn/aj p CITY OF TEMECULA POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS Traffic flow modifications covered by this policy include all "official traffic control devices" authorized by the California Vehicle Code. Some of the methods authorized in particular circumstances might include traffic islands, curbs, traffic barriers, or other roadway design features, removing or relocation traffic signals and one-way traffic flow. A petition request for the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets, including re- opening previously closed streets, will be considered by the City for those streets meeting all of the following criteria: The street must be classified as a "local street" based on the City's Circulation Element of the General Plan. b. The street should be primarily residential in nature. Traffic volumes on the street must equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles per day for a complete closure. Volumes for a partial closure must equal or exceed 1,000 vehicles per day. de Public Safety Agencies have not provided sufficient evidence of any major public safety concerns regarding the proposed street closure or traffic flow modification. An engineering safety study has determined that the proposed closure or traffic flow modifications will not create unreasonable traffic on the subject street or on streets which may be impacted by diverted traffic. f. ' The changes in traffic flow will not result in unreasonable liability exposure for the City. g, All persons signing a petition requesting a street closure or traffic flow modification acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modifications. h. The requested action is authorized by legislative authority in State law. PETITION REOUIREMENTS The following procedures must be followed for submitting a petition to the City: - i - r. ~.ffm~!~olicy~la,ut~- 1 i/gS/ajp The City Traffic Engineer will examine the technical feasibility and anticipated impacts of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. This review will include, but will not be limited to, items such as State law, the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, the type of road or street involved, compliance with engineering regulations, existing traffic conditions, projected traffic conditions, the potential for traffic diversion to adjacent streets, the increased liability exposure for the City or conflicts with future planned improvements. The City Traffic Engineer will determine the boundary of the "affected area" to be petitioned. The affected area will include those properties where normal travel routes are altered by the street closure or traffic flow modifications, and/or properties which are significantly impacted by traffic that is to be diverted. The petition requesting the street closure or traffic flow modifications must be supported by a minimum of 85 percent of the total number of properties within the "affected area.' Persons submitting petitions must attempt to contact all property owners within the affected area to determine their views on the proposed street closure or modifications in traffic flow. The City will not accept a petition unless the petitioner offers confirmation in a form satisfactory to the City Traffic Engineer that at least 95 percent of the property owners in the affected area have been contacted and have either signed the petition in support of the street closure or traffic flow modification or have signed a document indicating non-support for the street closure or traffic flow modification. d. At a minimum, petitions submitted to the City for review must include the following: A statement that all persons signing the petition acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modifications in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modifications. A drawing showing the exact location of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications and the boundary of the "affected area" must be provided. The drawing must include changes in traffic patterns anticipated as result of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. · The petition language must also clearly explain the location and nature of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. The petition language and attached drawing must be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to circulation to ensure its accuracy and ability to be clearly understood. · A specific reference to the Vehicle Code section authorizing such street closure or traffic flow modifications must be provided. A sample petition has been provided as an attachment to this poiicy. -2- r.~,/r~Mnolicy~hure-I lt95tajn PETITION REVIEW PROCESS The following process will be used to review all petitions associated with a.proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications: The City Traffic Engineer will review any petition to verify compliance with all petition requirements set forth above, including whether the request in the petition is authorized by State law. Any petition not complying with these requirements will not be accepted for consideration. If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications will be referred to all affected public agencies in conjunction with the environmental review process. When applicable, these agencies will include all City Departments, the local office of the California Highway Patrol, County Sheriff and Fire Departments, all affected local utility companies, Temecula Valley Unified School District, Riverside Transit Agency, the local office of California Department of Transportation and any other agencies affected by the requested closure or traffic flow modification. C, If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, where the street closure or traffic flow modifications on a street or system of streets may be accomplished by several different methods, a public workshop will be held to which all petitioners, affected property owners, and long-term tenants such as mobile home park residents will be invited to participate after the petition requesting the traffic flow modifications or street closure has been .-received and verified by the City. The purpose of the workshop will be to attempt to determine the method that has the greatest community support. CITY ACTION ON STREET CLOSURE OR TRAFFIC FLOW MODIFICATION REOUESTS Once a petition contains all of the .required information and all of the matters described above under "Petition .Review Process" have been completed, the City Traffic Engineer will prepare a report with recommendations and initiate and complete the environmental review process for the project. Project alternatives to the extent required will be defined for a temporary or permanent street closure or traffic flow modifications. The City of Temecula, Public/Traffic Safety Commission will review the street closure or traffic flow modifications request, any environmental review document prepared for the project, all public agency referral responses received during the environmental review process, and the results of the technical staff review. The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission may support or recommend against the street closure or traffic flow modifications. If the Public/Traffic Safety Commission denies the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications, that action will be final unless within ten days from the date of the City Traffic Engineer's notification of the Commission's decision to all property owners within the affected area, a property owner within the affected area appeals the Commission's decision to the City Council. In order to appeal the decision. the property owner shall file a written notice of appeal with the Department of Public Works. The appeal will be heard in accordance with the Appeal Process listed below. If the request is recommended for further consideration, after public notice is given, the City Council may, after -3- r: ~affic~policy ~stclomaw- 11/9.~/ajp making any necessary findings, establish a temporary or permanent period of street closure or traffic flow modifications. When the City Council considers a recommendation of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission or an appeal of a decision of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission with respect to a proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications, it will follow the process outlined below: A letter explaining the street closure or traffic flow modifications and the time and place when the matter will be heard by the City Council will be sent to all property owners, within the affected area prior to its installation. All approaches to the proposed closure or modification will be posted notifying motorists of upcoming Public Hearing. A Public Hearing will be set before the City Council and public notice will be given at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing by letter to property owners' in the affected area and by posting of signs on the affected roadways as described in this Section and by a notice published in the newspaper. Public notification of the City Council action will be given in cases when a street closure or traffic modifications is approved by the City Council, and signs giving notice of the street closure or traffic flow modifications will also be erected at least two weeks prior. to the date of implementation of the street closure or traffic modifications. In the event the action involves a highway not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the City of Temecula, the City will obtain the proper approvals from the California Transportation Commission pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21101 or 21100 (d) prior to implementation of the street closure or traffic flow modification. fe A letter explaining the final City Council decision will be sent by the City to all property owners, within the affected area. The City Council has the sole discretion, subject to all applicable laws, to approve, modify, continue or deny any street closure or traffic flow modifications request regardless of any support or-lack thereof via the petition process. Any action by the City Council to approve or deny a street closure or traffic flow .modifications request will be by adoption of a formal resolution. ..4- r: \Indr~c~olk~y~l~losure- 11/95tajp DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PETITION TO CLOSE OR MODIFY THE TRAFFIC FLOW ON STREET BETWEEN AND BY THE INSTALLATION OF {Nature of Chan~,es) AT (Location) DATE: BEFORE YOU SIGN THIS PETITION, UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SIGNING! IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU FIRST READ THE CITY'S POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS. We, the undersigned resident of the area shown on the attached map do/do not petition the City of Temecula to on Street as shown on the attached drawing. All persons signing this petition acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modification. The specific California Vehicle Code section(s) authorizing such closure or traffic flow modifications states: All persons signing this petition do hereby certify that they reside within the area impacted by the proposed traffic flow change as shown on the attached map. Our designated contact person is: Phone: Signature Print Name Print Address -5- r:. Utaff'gM~olicyXs~losu~- 11/951sip RULES AND REGULATIONS: SUBJECT MATTER VEHICLE CODE SECTiON 21100. Local authorities may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution regarding the following matters: a. Regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages on the highways. Licensing and regulating the operation of vehicles for hire and drivers of passenger vehicles for hire. c. Regulating traffic by means of traffic officers. Regulating traffic by means of official traffic control devices meeting the requirements of Section 21400. Regulating traffic by means of any person given temporary or permanent appointment for such duty by the local authority whenever official traffic control devices are disabled or otherwise inoperable, at the scenes of accidents or disasters, or at such locations as may require traffic direction for orderly traffic flow. No person shall, however, be appointed pursuant to this subdivision unless and until the local authority has submitted to the commissioner or to the chief law enforcement officer exercising jurisdiction in the enforcement of traffic laws within the area in which such person is to perform such duty, for review, a proposed program of instruction for the training of a person for such duty, and unless and until the commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer approves the proposed program. The commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer shall approve such a proposed program if he reasonably determines that the program will provide sufficient training for persons assigned to perform the duty described in this subdivision. f, Regulating traffic at the site of road or street construction or maintenance by persons authorized for such duty by the local authority. g, Licensing and regulating the operation of tow truck service or tow truck drivers whose principal place of business or employment is within the jurisdiction of the local authority, excepting the operation and operator of any auto dismantler's tow vehicle licensed under Section 11505 or any tow truck operated by a repossessing agency licensed under Chapter 11 (commencing with Section 7500) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code and its registered employees. Nothing in this subdivision shall limit the authority of a city or city and - county pursuant to Section 12111. Operation of bicycles, and, as specified in Section 21114.5, electric carts by physically disabled persons, or persons 50 years of age or older, on the public sidewalks. Providing for the appointment of nonstudent school crossing guards for the protection of persons who are crossing a street or highway in the vicinity of a school or while returning thereafter to a place of safety. -6- r:.~tff'tc~elicy~b:lomar~l !/9511~jp Regulating the methods of deposit of garbage and refuse in streets and highways for collection by the local authority or by any person authorized by the local authority. Regulating cruising. The ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall regulated cruising, which shall be defined as the repetitive driving of a motor vehicle past a traffic control point, in traffic which is congested at or near the traffic control point, as determined by the ranking peace officer on duty within the affected area, within a specified time period and after the vehicle operator has been given an adequate written notice that further driving past the control point will be a violation of the ordinance or resolution. No person is in violation of an ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision unless (1) that person has been given the written notice on a previous driving trip past the control point and then again passes the control point in that same time interval and (2) the beginning and end of the portion of the street subject to cruising controls are clearly identified by signs that briefly and clearly state the appropriate provisions of this subdivision and the local ordinance or resolution on cruising. Regulating or authorizing the removal by peace officers of vehicles unlawfully parked in a fire lane, as described in Section 22500.1, on private property. Any removal pursuant to this subdivision shall be consistent to the extent possible with the procedures for removal and storage set forth in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 22650). TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES: UNIFORM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21100. I Whenever any city or county, by ordinance or resolution, permits, restricts, or prohibits the use of public or private highways pursuant to this article, any traffic control device erected by it on or after January 1, 1981, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications adopted by the Depati~nent of Transportation pursuant to Section 21400. REGULATION OF HIGHWAYS VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21101. Local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution on the following matters: a, Closing any highway to vehicular traffic when, in the opinion of the legislative body having jurisdiction, the highway is no longer needed for vehicular traffic. b, Designating any highway as a through highway and requiring that all vehicles observe official traffic control devices before entering or crossing the highway or designating any intersection as a stop intersection and requiring all vehicles to stop at one or more entrances to the intersection. C, Prohibiting the use of particular highways by certain vehicles, except as otherwise provided by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 1031) of Chapter 5 of Pan 1 of Division 1 of Public Utilities Code. No ordinance which is adopted pursuant to this subdivision after November 10, 1969, shall apply to~any state highway which is included in the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, except an ordinance which has been approved by the California Transportation Commission by a four-fifths vote. -7- r. Xu~f'gXpolicy~:lo.uf~-ll/95/ajp Closing particular streets during regular school hours for the purpose of conducting automobile driver training programs in the secondary schools and colleges of this state. e, Temporarily closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing. Prohibiting entry to, or exit from, or both, from any street by means of islands, curbs, traffic barriers, or other roadway design features to implement the circulation element of a general plan adopted pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 65350) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. The rules and regulations authorized by this subdivision shall be consistent with the responsibility of local government to provide for the health and safety of its citizens. LOCAL AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY CLOSE HIGHWAY: CRIMINAL ACTIVITY VEHICLE CODE SECTION 21101.4 (a) A local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, adopt rules and regulations for temporarily closing to through traffic a highway under its jurisdiction when all of the following conditions are, after a public hearing, found to exist. The local authority finds and determines th'at there is serious and continual criminal activity in the portion of the highway recommended for temporary closure. This finding and determination shall be based upon the recommendation of the police department or, in the case of a highway in an unincorporated area, on the joint recommendation of the sheriffs department and the Department of the California Highway Patrol. 2. The highway has not been designated as a through highway or arterial street. 3. Vehicular or pedestrian traffic on the highway contributes to the criminal activity. The closure will not substantially adversely affect the operation of emergency vehicles, the performance of municipal or public utility services, or the delivery of freight by commercial vehicles in the area of the highway proposed to be temporarily closed. (b) A highway may be temporarily closed pursuant to subdivision (a) for not more than 18 months, except that period may, pursuant to subdivision (a), be extended for one additional period of not more than 18 months. Facing Up to a Street Closure Epidemic BY R. MARSHALL ELIZER JR. AND NAZIR LALANI s major street networks in urban- Aized areas become more congested and traffic seeks alternative routes, ]ocal agencies throughout the United States are facing street closure requests by their residents. Local residential streets with back-out driveways that were intended to carry. a few hundred vehicles per day are now frequently car- ry. ing in excess of several thousand vehi- cles per day. Agencies are being asked to either close these streets to through traffic in order to improve residents' safety and quality of life, or to restrict the traffic flow bv installation of medi- ans and other barriers. Street closures are also being generated in parts of California bv the desire to limit high- volume vehicular access to streets adja- cent to schools for security and safety reasons. Increasing crime rates have triggered moves by cities in Southern, California to,close streets to reduce gang and drug-related activities from being conducted in residential neigh- borhoods. One, example of this growing prob- lem was recently played out in the City of San Buenaventura. The City Council' decided to close Poll Street (Figure 1 ). a collector street that bisects Ventura High School's campus. but carnes 9.500 vehicles a day. Currently the high school staff place barricades a,cross the street and close it to traffic between 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. This closure was enacted by the City Council in response to demands from school administrators that something be done to curb the potential for gang violence and drive-by 24 · ITE JOURNAL * OCTOBER 1994 Fi~re 1. Poll Street dosed Io traffic tbro~b Veatura Hi~b 5¢beol ¢amp~ belween 7:38 =.~, smi 4'~ p,m, shoorings. To prevent traffic using par- allel. narrow residential streets to cir- cumvent the closure. barricades (Figure 2) are placed across two residential streets during the time that Poll Street is closed to traffic. Figure 3 shows the location of all three street closures. This action has been strongly resented l~y the area residents and has resulted in fie- quenf. long and heated City Council meetings with little opportunity for compromise. The decision to close a public street to through traffic. even if a local street. is an important and often controversial public policy. decision. Even if adjacent residents are solidly in favor of such a street closure or modification of traffic flow. motorists from outside' the imme- diate area who are impacted will often vehemently oppose the removal of this "public" facihty. There are also impor- tant traffic engineenng and safety. con-- siderations to be determined. such as if problems actually exist {volume. speed. accidents) to warrant the closure. Othe.' considerations are: · Will the diverted traffic create similar problems or request on other streets? · How will the proposed changes in traffic flow affect the ability of police. fire, and ambulance services to access the immediate and surrounding neigh- borhoods? · Are there other less reatncti vs to address the residents' concern, · How and where should the street do- sure or traffic flow modification take place, and who will pay for and main- rain the installation? In order for local agencies to effec- tively address requests for street clo- sures or traffic flow modifications, com- prehensive policies should be devel- oped in order to determine how such requests are going to be evaluated and decisions made. When there is not a documented need and solid consensus among area residents on the need for closure, efforts by local agencies to close streets or modify traffic flow can often lead to divisive neighborhood debates that require vast amounts of staff time and result in heated no-win heanngs in front of elected officials. For ~nat reason, the City of San Buenaventura drafted a poilcy1 that is designed to provide a comprehensive process whereby street closure and traf- fic flow modification requests can be properly evaluated and decision made. The clty's recently adopted policy was based on a street closure policy that was adopted by the City of Lakewood, Colorado, in 1985.2 To a~sist other local agencies who might be 'attempting ~o ~ddress similar problem in their own communities, the City of Buenaventura has provided a summary of what they believe to be the essential elements a typical policy of this type should con- tain. Purpose of Policy It should be the general policy of all agencies to not allow temporary or per- manent closure of any.. public street to vehicular traffic. Requests for closure or modification of traffic flow on a public street may be considered, however, based on a petition that meets all the criteria and procedures outlined herein. Agencies should carefully review each street closure or traffxc flow modifica- tion request to ensure that the proposed location and attending circumstances me,-~ all the criteria outlined in this pol- i~- and in relevant state lawi. The pur- pose of a street closure or traffic flow modification policy should be to set forth the process and criteria by which modification of traffic flow or closure of Public streets may be considered by the agencies' staff and elected officials, and to identify the conditions under which closures or modifications may be enact- ed. This policy should only apply to the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets initiated by citizens. The policy should not apply to closur~ or modifications initiated by a local agency to address specific traffic safety issues or to comply with state and feder- al standards and warrants. The policy also should not apply to temporary changes in traffic that are needed to stage construction/maintenance activi- ties or special events. NEVER-FAIL LOOP SYSTE Troffic Flow Moc!fficofions C) K ~~,,E J Covered by Policy ~ Traffc flow modifications covered -- · d by a.y propnse poUcy she,d prefer- LOOP ably include, at a miramum, typical gee- : meu'ic duiSn features and ofSciai raf- fic control devices authorized by the state vehicle code. Some of the methods authorized by the policy might include traffic islands, curbs, traffic barriers/diverters, or other roadway design featu.r. es; and removing or rein- eating traffic siEnais or stop signs and one-way traffic flow. Cfiterjo: A petition request f~r the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets, including reopening previously closed streets, should only be consid- ered by local agencies for those streets meeting all of the following criteria: 1. The street should be classified as a "local street" on th~ agency's officially adopted Circulation Plan. : Z The street should be primarily res- idential in nature, 3. Traffic volumes on the street should equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles per day for a complete closure. Volumes for a partial closure should equal or exceed 1,000 vehicles per day. 4. There is not sufficient evidence of any major emergency response or pub- lic safety concerns regarding the pro- · po~ed closure or modifications. 5. An engineering and safety study has determined that the proposed sure or modifications will not create unacceptable traffic conditions on the subject street or on streets that may be impacted by diverted traffic 6. The changes in traffic flow will not result in unreasonable liability exposure for the agency as determined by engi- ~UAP,~ TECHNOLOGY BUILT LONG OUADRAPOL~ FEA 3;URES ASPHALT-RUBBER FILLED POL YPROPYLENE CONSTRUCTION. ~BLE/FOLDABLE EXPANSION CONTRACTION JOINTS. ~ LOOPS IN EXCESS OF 100 FT. EASILY HANDLED. HERME'TIC ASSEMBLIES - 4t LAYERS OF MOISTURE PROTECTION. RESISTANC; TO GROUND-TY3e!CALLY OFT SCALE. O-STABILIZED QUAUTY OF LOOP DOES NOT FALL OFT WITH TIME. USER REFERENCES AVAILABLE NEVE -FAIL LOOP SYSTEMS 6021 S.W. 48TH AVE. PORTLAND OR 97221 ( 503 ) 244-6345 ITE JQURNAL · OCTOBER 1994 · 25 neering staff in conjunction with the local agency's attorneys. 7. All those signing a petition .requesting a street closure or traffic flow modification acknowledge it is the agency's policy that they may be required to participate in all costs directly associated with the street clo- sure or traffic flow modification in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the closure or modifications. 8. The requested action is authorized by legislative authority in state and local laws. Review of State Law Most states preempt the field of traf- fic control, and local authority is allowed to enact or enforce any ordi- nance on the matters covered by the state's vehicle code unless expressly authorized bv statute. Also it is usually most states' policy. that all people have an equal right to use the streets and highways, and localities have no carte blanche and, absent express authority, may not determine which traffic shall or shall not use streets. Based upon this policy, in the absence of specific state legislative authority to the contrary, an agency may~ not be able to restrict the right to travel upon one of its streets to its residents or to other exempted dri- vers. Some examples in the California Vehicle Code of such specific authontv to regulate travel upon streets are: if th~ agency. 's elected officials determine the street is no longer needed for vehicular traffic [21101 (a)]; if the street is needed to implement the agency's officially adopted cirnlation plan [21101(0]; and if the street divides school Founds and protection of students is a consideration [211(Y2]. When a !ocal agency decides to utilize the express delegation of such authority, it may only utilize geometric design features or 'official traffic con- trol devices" authorized by the vehicle code. All requests for street closures or traffic flow modifications should be reviewed by local agencies for confor- mdace with state and local laws I:~flfion Requirements The following procedures should be · followed for submitting petitions: 1. The agency's traffic or transporta- tion engineer should examine the tech- nical feasibility and anticipate impacts of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modification. This review should include, but not be limited to, items such as state law, the agency's officially adopted circulation plan. the type of road or street involved. compliance with engineering regulations. existing traffic conditions, projected traffic con- ditions, the potential for traffic diver- sion to adjacent streets, the increased liability exposure for the city, or con- flicts with future planned improve- meats. 2. The agency's traffic or transporta- tion engineer should determine the boundary. of the "affected area" to be 26 · ITE JOURNAL · OCTOBER 1994 petitioned. The affected area i~cludes, but is not limited to, those proper-~s where normal travel routes to an the affected area are to be alte~ the street closure or traffic flow modi~- cations, and/or properties that are sig- nificantly impacted by traffic to be diverted. 3. The petition should be supported by a minimum of 80 percent of the total citizens affected by the proposed changes in traffic flow, as determined by the agency. Affected citizens are defined as property owners, tenants, business owners, and long-term tenants (such as mobile home park residents) within the affected area who might be significantly affected by the proposed modifications or closure. People sub- mining petitions must attempt to con- tact all affected parties. At a minimum, 95 percent of all those affected who may need to use the street(s) on a daily basis must be contacted for the petition to be accepted by the agency. This requirement is satisfied by signatures from 95 percent of the affected parties indicating support or non-support for the changes. 4. At a minimum. the petition sDl~ mired to the agency for review sl' include the following: --A statement that all those signing the petition acknowledge it is the agency's policy that they may be required to par- ticipate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modifications in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the closure or modifications, --A drawing showing the exact location of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications and the boundary of the area in which traffic could potential- ly be affected. The drawing should include changes in traffic patterns antic- ipated as a result of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. --A clear explanation of the location and nature of the proposed closure or modifications, --Approval of the petition language and attached drawing by the agency's traffic or transportation engineer to ensure its accuracy and ability to be clearly understoocL --A specific reference to the vehicl~ c0de3 section authorizing such sr closure or traffic flow modificati, from the local agency. Petition Review Process The following process should be used to review all peruions associated with a proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications: 1. The agency's traffic or trausporm- lion engineer should review any peti- .lion to verify compliance with all peti- tion requirements set for, h above. Any petition not complying with these requirements should not be accepted for consideration. 2. If the petition contains all of the required information under the agency's adopted policy, the local agency should send a letter to affected citizens who signed the petition. The purpose of the letter is to obtain verifi- cation of support or opposition to the proposed closure or modifications ~om each person who signed the initial peti- lion. 3. If the petition contains all of the required in/ormation under this policy, the proposed closure or modifications should be referred to all affected public agencies in conjunction with the envi- ronmental review process. At a mini- mum, these agencies should include all the agency's own departments, all affected local utili~ companies, school districts, emergency response proriders ,and transit agencies. They should also include the local office of the highway patrol, the. 'local office of the state Department of Transportation, and any other agencies that have authority over the streets affected by the requested closure or traffic flow modification. Where the closure or modifications on a street or s.vstem of streets may be accomplished by several different meth- ods. a public workshop should be held, and affected citizens invited to partici- pate. The purpose of the workshop is to attempt to determine the method that has the greatest community sup- port prior to circulation of the petition. plete the enviwnmental review process for the project. To the extent required, project alternatives should be defined for a temporary or permanent street closure or traffic flow modification. Where they exist, the agency's traffic or transportation committee should review the closure or modifications request, any environmental review document prepared for the project, all public agency referral responses received dur- ing the environmental review process, and the results of the technical staff review. The traffic or transportation committee should be requested to either support or Fecommend against the street closure or traffic flow modifi- cations. If the committee recommends against the closure or modifications, that action should be final and the agency's engineer should notify all peti- riohers. If the request is recommended for further consideration, the ageney's elected officials may, after public notice is given and after making any necessary findings, establish a temporary or per- maneat period of street closure or traf- ~c flow modifications. When co. ntemplating a potential street closure or traffic flow m0difica- lions, the agency should typically follow the process outlined below-. 1, A letter explaining the street clo- sure or traffic flow modifications and the time and place when the matter is to be heard by the agency's elected officials should be sent to all petition- era, property owners, tenants, and businesses within the affected area prior to its installation. 2, A public hearing should be set before the public notice is given. 3. Public notification of the agency's official action should be given in cases when a closure or modi- fication is approved by a majority of the elected officials, and signs giving notice of the closure or modifications should also be erected at least two - weeks prior to the date of implementa- lion. 4, A letter explaining the final deci- lion of the agency should be sent to all affected c/tizens. The officially adopted poficy should contain language that clearly states that NEW DENOMINATOR Agency Action on Street Closure or Traffic Flow Modfficcdion Requests 16unilsononelo0tlQuare # Once a petition contains all of the required information and the petition review process has been completed, the agency's traffic or transportation engi- neer should prepare a report with rec- ommendations, and initiate and- corn- TRAFFIC COUNTERS AND TALLY BOARDS of keys, aflottincJ N ightmst actuating · Rugged:karl yet I~Mwe~M · t 'qquer, a~ moorote boems--maor maclehxyourc=unttngneecl8 · Woftc in 811 kind8 of westher · Alxolutm accuracy · Writ8 fly ixochure anti IMce lilt Slewtgllmsewe~)a~nim 1114 THE DENOMINATOR CO., INCq WOODBURY, CT 06798 (203) 263'3210 ITE JOURNAL · OCTOBER !~4 · 27 FiFe 3. london of Poll Street doere tad two parallel residential streets. the agency has the sole discretion, sub- jea to all applicable laws, to approve, modify, continue, or deny any street closure or traffic flow modification request regardless of any support or lack of support via the petition process. Any official action by the agency to approve or deny a closure or modifica- tion request should be by adoption of a formal resolution. ATI~. Cotash: Volume, Speed, Ow. Axle, (aap, Headway, Event-Logging, Presence Tim, Occupancy ...... )l',,wn,i Ca: Turning Movement, Class, O&D Studies, Parking Counts, Pedestrian Counts .................. W'eJ~-Iu-]l[odoa; Axle Weight, TotsJ Weight, Number of Axles, Class, Speed, V'mlaaans .................................. (Temporary & Perrnmqent inmallaaons) 1~-o~: Traffic Counters {Sales & Rentals), WIM Equipment. Tc,;~orary Road Loops Services Hsroughout For 'a quote ca/l us a~: Tel/Fax (416)890-1430 50 RineshridSe Carden Circle, Ssdte 804 ]H'Isstasau&'a, Ontario, Canada IaSR 1Y2 28 · ITE JOURNAL · OCTOBER 1~74 Citizen Information Brochure The City of San Buenaventu; developed an informational brochux,. ,o explain the city's Traffic Flow Modification Policy to citizens. This is part of the city's series of informauonal brochures on traffic engineering issues such as speed limits, crosswalks, traffic signal stops, parking, }eft turn phasing, and school zone safety. Anyone wishing to obtain copies of brochures should send a written request including a mailing address to: Nazir Lalani, P.O. Box Ventura, CA 93003. Fax 805/648-1809. References 1. City Council of the City of San Buenaventura, California, Policy of the City of San Buenavenlura Relanve W Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets (1993), Resolution 93- 130. 2. City of Lakewood, Colorado, A Resolution EstablBtzmg a Policy for Street Closures in the City of Lakewood, Colorado (1985), Resolution 85-]81. 3. Vehicle Code, State of California, (1993). I R. Mars Eiizer Jr,, P.E., ., director of Public Works and k Transportation for /. the C~y of Modesw, Calif He war previ- ously director of transportation for the city of Arlington, Texas. Elizer holds a B.S.C.E. and an M.S.C.E. from the University of Tennessee. He ix a past president of the Colorado/Wyoming Section and past secretary-treasurer of the Texas Section. He is the current International Vice President, 1995 President Elec~ and a Fellow of ITE. : ~' Nazir Lalani, ' '~ ~ P.E., is city trans- ~,~" portation engineer ' - with San Buenaven- tufa, Calif. He holds a B.S. Chem. E. from the Univer- sity of Exeter and an M.S.C.E. from Arizona State University at Tempe. Lalani was president of District 6 ~ 1989-90, is a current Board Membe, · District 6 and a Fellow of the institute. AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety CommiSsion FROM: Marry Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE: August 25, 1994 SUBJECT: Item 4 City of Temecula - Street Closure or Modification Policy RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and comment on the draft Street Closure or Modification Policy. BACKGROUND: Due to requests to have the Department of Public Works close or modify public streets, the Traffic Division proposes to create a policy to guide public officials in order to ensure solutions that are equatable for the entire community. The State of California has preempted the field of traffic control (refer to Section 21 of the California Vehicle Code), and no local authority is allowed to enact or enforce any ordinance on the matters covered by the Vehicle Code unless expressly authorized by statute. It is the policy of the State that all persons have an equal right to use the streets and highways, and localities have no carte blanche and, absent express authority, may not determine which traffic shall and which shall not use streets. Based upon this policy, in the absence of specific State legislative authority to the contrary, a city may not restrict the right to travel upon one of its streets to its residents or to other exempted drivers. Some examples in the Vehicle Code of such specific authority to regulate travel upon streets are: if the City Council determines the street is no longer needed for vehicular traffic [§21101 (a)]; if needed to implement the Circulation Element of a General Plan [§21101 (f)]; if due to criminal activity [§21101.4]; regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages [§(a)]; and on streets dividing school grounds to protect students attending such school or school grounds. When a local agency decides to utilize the express delegation of such authority, the local agency may only utilize "office traffic control devices" authorized by the Vehicle Code. Additional, local authorities may not place gates or other selective devices on any street which deny or restrict the access of certain members of the public to the street, while permitting others unrestricted access to the street. PURPOSE OF POLICY Consistent with State law and policy, it is the general policy of the City to not allow temporary or permanent closure of any public street to vehicular traffic. Requests for closure or modification of traffic flow on a public street will be considered, however, based on a petition which meets all the criteria and procedures outlined in the attached. policy. The City will carefully review each street closure or traffic flow modification request to ensure that the proposed location and attending circumstances meet all the criteria outlined in our policy and in State law described above. The purpose of this policy is to set forth the process and f':%trdfk~%iBcndm\~&4%O82,~le, iP criteria by which modification of traffic flow or closure of public streets may be considered by the City Council and to identify the conditions under which closures or modifications may be enacted. This policy only applies to the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets initiated by citizens. This policy will not apply to the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets initiated by the City to address specific traffic safety issues or to comply with State and Federal standards and warrants. This policy also will not apply to temporary changes in traffic that are needed to stage special events in the City. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. Draft Street Closure or Modification Policy 2. Appendix "A" AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Many Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE: September 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Item 4 Street Closure/Modification Policy RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the attached "City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets". BACKGROUND: This policy was previously presented to the Commission in draft form for review and comment. A few items were discussed and requested to be incorporated into a final draft to be brought back for Commission approval. The Traffic Division recommended that specific wording changes be submitted prior to September 13, 1994 for incorporation, providing staff with clear direction. Commissioner Guerriero was contacted to solicit input since he was absent from the Commission meeting of August 25, 1994. The attached document, "City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets", identifies staffs effort to include all items discussed at our meeting because no written changes were received. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets r:Xltalf~\~::ommlamaXa~=nda\~M\O922/ajp ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC CITY MANAGER~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph ICicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer December 12, 1995 Western Bypass Assessment District 95-1 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR INTENTION TO MAKE ACQUISITIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WESTERN BYPASS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1 RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO BACKGROUND: The Western Bypass, a roadway between the interchange at I-15 at State Route 79 South and the City of Murrieta is part of the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the Cities of Temecula as well as Murrieta. The current proposal is to construct a portion of the Western Bypass. The portion to be constructed consists of the following: Construction of four (4) lanes divided roadway from I-15/79(S)Interchange for a distance of approximately 5,600 feet northerly. Extension southerly of Vincent Moraga Drive from its present southerly terminus to join the Western Bypass roadway. Vincent Moraga shall be a four (4) lane roadway. Roadway grading from the above intersection of Western Bypass and Vincent Moraga, northerly to Rancho California Road to provide for future overcrossing at Rancho California Road. r.\agdrpt\95%1212%asf195-1 .reelnip The proposed project is being funded by an Assessment District, through assessments of benefiting properties (Assessment District 95-1 ). The boundaries of the Assessment District are shown on the attached boundary map. The parcels within those boundaries are being assessed in accordance with the benefit received by each of the parcels. It should be noted that certain parcels within the Old Town, west of Murrieta Creek do receive benefit from the proposed construction. These parcels are also within the boundary of Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and provide low-moderate housing for the residents of Temecula. The assessments on the parcels within the Old Town, west of Murrieta Creek, was computed on the basis of benefit received. The total amount of assessment against those properties is $395,892. The staff is recommending that the above amount be considered as contribution from the Redevelopment Agency to Assessment District No. 95-1. This contribution would recognize the Redevelopment Agency's economic development efforts within the Old Town Specific Plan area. It should also be noted that the plans and specifications for the project are still in the preparation stage, and therefore the total project cost estimates ($14,816,757)are necessarily on the high side. After completion of the plans and specifications, staff will request authorization to go to bid on the project. After receiving the bids, contract award will be recommended to the lowest responsible bidder, and the assessment will be adjusted to reflect the actual bid rather than the estimate currently used. It should be noted that the assessments can not be increased from the amount shown on the preliminary notice of assessment without the consent of the property owners or starting the proceedings all over with new resolutions being adopted and new notices being sent out. FISCAL IMPACT: Contribution from the Redevelopment Agency in the amount of $395,892. Attachment: Resolution No. 95- A Resolution of Intention to Make Acquisitions and Improvements Western Bypass Assessment District No. 95-1 Resolution No. 95-~ - A Resolution of Preliminarily Approving Engineers Report Western Bypass Assessment District No. 95-1 3. Boundary Map r.%agdrpt%95%1212~asst95-1 .reelnip RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR INTENTION TO MAKE ACQUISITIONS AND IMPROVEM'EN'I~ FOR THE WESTF_j~ BYPASS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1 THE CITY COUNCIL (the "COUNCIL") OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA (the "CITY"), COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Intention. The public interest, convenience and necessity require, and that it intends to order the making of the acquisitions and improvements described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof in and for the City's proposed Western Bypass Assessment District No. 95-1 (the "Assessment District"). Section 2. Law Applicable. Except as hercin otherwise provided for the issuance of bonds, all of the work shall be done as provided in the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of California (the "Act"). Section 3. Nature and Iocation of and Grades of Improvements. All of the work and improvements are to be constructed at the places and in the particular locations, of the forms, sizes, dimensions and materials, and at the lines, grades and elevations, as shown and delineated upon the plans, profiles and specifications to be made therefor, as hereinafter provided. There is to be excepted from the work above described any of such work already done to line and grade and marked excepted or shown not to be done on the plans, profiles and specifications. Whenever any public way is herein referred to as running between two public ways, or from or to any public way, the intersections of the public ways referred to are included to the extent that work is shown on the plans to be done therein. The streets and highways are or will be more · particularly shown in the records .in. the office of the County Recorder of the County and 'shall be shown upon-the plans. Section 4. Change of Grade. Notice is hereby given of the fact that in many cases the work and improvements will bring the finished work to a grade different from that formerly existing, and that to the extent the grades are hereby changed and that the work will be done to the changed grades. Section 5. Work on Private Property. In cases where there is any disparity in level or size between the improvements proposed to be made herein and private property and where it is more economical to eliminate such disparity by work on the private property than by adjustment of the work on public property, it is hereby determined that it is in the public interest and more economical to do such work on private property to eliminate such disparity. In such. cases, the work on private property shall, with the written consent of the owner of the property, be done and the actual cost thereof may be added to the proposed assessment of the lot on which the work is to be done. 1 rAegdrpt~.95\1212~asst95-1 .reslejO Section 6. Official Grades. This Council does hereby adopt and establish as the official grades for the work the grades and elevations to be shown upon the plans profiles and specifications. All such grades and elevations are to be in feet and decimals thereof with reference to the datum plane of this City. Section 7. Descriptions - General. The descriptions of the acquisitions and improvements and the termini of the work contained in this Resolution are general in nature. All items of work do not necessarily extend for the full length of the description thereof. The plans and profiles of the work and maps and descriptions as contained in the Engineer' s Report, hereinafter directed to be made and filed, shall be controlling as to the correct and detailed description thereof. Section 8. Special Benefit and Boundary Map. The contemplated acquisitions and improvements, in the opinion of this Council, are of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the costs and expenses thereof are made chargeable upon the Assessment District, the exterior boundaries of which are shown on a map thereof on file in the office of the City Clerk, to which reference is hereby made for further particulars. The map indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory proposed to be included in Assessment District and shall govern for all details as to the extent of the Assessment District. Section 9. Public Property Exempt. This Council declares that all public streets, highways, lanes and alleys within the Assessment District in use in the performance of a public function, and all lands owned by any public entity, including the United States and the State of California, or any departments thereof, shall be omitted from the assessment hereafter to be made to cover the costs and expenses of the acquisitions and improvements. Section 10. Engineer' s Report. The acquisitions and improvements are hereby referred to John Eagan, John Eagan & Associates, Inc., being a competent person employed for the purpose hereof as Engineer of Work for this assessment district (the "Engineer of Work"), and the Engineer of Work is hereby directed to make and file with the City Clerk a report in writing (the "Engineer' s Report "), presenting the following: (a) Maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to be acquired, if any; (b) Plans and specifications of the proposed improvements if the improvements are not already installed. The plans and specifications do not need to be detailed and are sufficient if they show or describe the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements. If the Assessment District is divided into zones, the plans and specifications shall indicate the class and the type of improvements to be provided for each zone. The plans or specifications may be prepared as separate documents, or either or both may be incorporated in the Engineer's Report as a combined document. (c) A general description of works or appliances already installed and any other property necessary or convenient for the operation of the improvements, if the works, appliance, or property are to be acquired as pan of the improvements. 2 r:\aOdrpt\95%121 2\asst95-1 .res/ajp (d) An estimate of the cost of the improvements and of the cost of lands, rights-of-' way, easements, and incidental expenses in connection with the improvements, including any cost of issuing and registering bonds. (e) A diagram showing, as they existed at the time of the passage of this Resolution, all of the following: (1) The exterior boundaries of the Assessment District. (2) The boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District. (3) The lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within the Assessment District. Each subdivision, shall be given a separate number upon the diagram. The diagram may refer to the county assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any parcels, in which case those maps shall govern for all details concerning the lines and dimensions of the parcels. (f) A proposed assessment of the total mount of the cost and expenses of the proposed improvement upon the several subdivisions of land in the Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each subdivision, respectively, from the improvement. The assessment shall refer to the subdivisions by their respective numbers as assigned pursuant to subdivision (e). In the case of an assessment for installation of planned local drainage facilities which are financed, in whole or pan, pursuant to Section 66483 of the California Government Code, the assessment levied :against each parcel of subdivided land may be levied on the basis of the proportionate storm water runoff from each parcel. When any portion or percentage of the costs and expenses of the acquisitions and improvements is to be paid from sources other than assessments, the mount of such portion or percentage shall first be deducted from the total estimated cost and expenses of the acquisitions and improvements, and the assessment shall include only the remainder of the estimated cost and expenses. Section 11. Use of Surplus. If any excess shall be realized from the assessment it shall be used, in such amounts as this Council may determine, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, for one or more of the following purposes: (a) Transfer to the general fund of this City, provided that the mount of any such transfer shall not exceed the lesser of $1,000 or 5% of the total amount expended from the improvement fund; (b) As a credit upon the assessment and any supplemental assessment or for the redemption of bonds, or both; or (c) For the maintenance of the improvements. : : 3 r:\egdrpt\95%1212%nest95-1 .reelsip Section 12. Contact Person. Joseph Kicak, Public Works Director, City of Temecula, is hereby designated as the person to answer inquiries regarding any protest proceedings to be had herein, and may be contacted during regular office hours at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, or by calling telephone number (909) 694-6411. Section 13. Contracts with Others. To the extent that any of the work, rights, improvements and acquisitions indicated in the Engineer's Report, to be made as provided herein, are shown to be connected to the facilities, works or systems of, or are to be owned, managed and controlled by, any public agency other than this City, or of any public utility, it is the intention of this Council to enter into an agreement with such public agency or public utility pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 10100) of the Act, which agreement may provide for, among other matmrs, the ownership, operation and maintenance by such agency or utility of the works, rights, improvements and acquisitions, and may provide for the installation of all or a portion of such improvements by the agency or utility and for the providing of service to the properties in the area benefiting from the work, rights, improvements and acquisitions by such agency or utility in accordance with its rates, rules and regulations, and that such agreement shall become effective after proceedings have been taken for the levy of the assessments and sale of bonds and funds are available to carry out the terms of any such agreement. Section 14.- Improvement Bonds. Notice is hereby given that serial and/or term improvement bonds to represent unpaid assessments, and bear interest at the rate of not to exceed such rate of interest as may be authorized by applicable law a time of sale of such bonds, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Bond Law"), the last installment of which bonds shall mature not to exceed twenty-five (25) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve months from their date. The bonds shall be issued in such series and shall mature in such principal amounts at such times as shall be determined by this Council at the time of the issuance of such bonds. The provisions of Part 11.1 of the Bond Law, providing an alternative procedure for the advance payment and calling of bonds, shall apply to the bonds issued in these proceedings. It is the intention of this Council to create a special reserve fund pursuant to and as authorized by Part 16 of the Bond Law. It is the 'intention of the City that the City will not obligate itself to advance available funds from the treasury of the City to cure any deficiency in the redemption fund to be created with respect to the bonds; provided, however, that the determination not to obligate itself shall not prevent the City from, in its sole discretion, so advancing funds. Section 15. Refunding of Bonds. The bonds may be refunded pursuant to the provisions of Division 11.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code upon the determination of the Council of the City that the public interest or necessity requires such refunding. Such refunding may be undertaken by the Council when, in its opinion, lower prevailing interest rates may allow reduction in the amount of the installments of principal and interest upon the assessments given to owners of property assessed for the works herein described. The refunding bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed that which is stated in the resolution of the Council expressing its intention to issue the refunding bond, which resolution of intention shall' also set forth the maximum term of years of the refunding bonds. The refunding shall be accomplished pursuant to Division 11.5 (commencing with Sec. tion 9500) of the California- Streets and Highways Code, except that, if, following the ~ing of the report specified in Section 4 r.\aOdrpt%95%l 212%east95-1 .res/ajp 9523 and any subsequent modifications of the report, the Council finds that each of the conditions specified in the resolution of intention to issue the refunding bonds is satisfied and that adjustments to the assessments are on a pro-rata basis, the Council may approve and confirm the report and may, without further proceedings, authorize, issue and sell the refunding bonds pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 9600) of Division 11.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Section 16. Division 4. Reference is hereby made to proceedings had pursuant to Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of California which are on f~e in the office of the City Clerk. It is the intention of this Council to comply with Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of California by proceeding under Part 7.5 thereof. To that end, the Engineer of Work is hereby directed to include in the Engineer's Report all of the material specified by such Part 7.5 and for which the total true value shall be estimated as the full cash value of the parcels of land in the Assessment District as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County. Section 17. No Private Contract. Notice is hereby given that, in the opinion of this Council, the public interest will not be served by allowing the property owners to take the contract for the construction of the improvements and therefore that, pursuant to Section 20487 of the California Public Contract Code, no notice of award of contract shall be published. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEr}, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk r.\aOdrpt\g5%1212%nest95*1 .reslajp [S AL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: - COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: K~agdrpt~95%l 21 2~am~t95-1 .reslejp EXItIBIT CITY OF TEMECULA Western Bypass Assessment District No. 95-1 DESCRIPTION OF WORK The Western Bypass Corridor (WBC) will be constructed as a four (4) lane divided roadway from near the Front Street/Highway 79 South intersection, to Vincent Moraga Drive, a distance of approximately 5,600 feet. Vincent Moraga Drive, a four (4) lane undivided roadway, will be constructed from this intersection, northerly, to join existing Vincent Moraga Drive, approximately 1,200 feet. Roadway grading will be completed for the future extension of the WBC approximately 3,400 feet from Vincent Moraga Drive to join Rancho California Road. No paving will be placed on this section of the WBC as part of this project. 7 r:\agdrpt%gSX1212%seer95-1 .reele, jp RESOLLrrION NO. 9.5- A RESOLU~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO THE CITY COUNCIL (the "COUNCIL") OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA (the "CITY"), COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Resolution of intention. On December 12, 1995, this Council adopted its Resolution of Intention to Make Acquisitions and Improvements, (the "Resolution of Intention") under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, (the "Act") to initiate proceedings under the Act in and for the City's Western Bypass Assessment District No. 95-1 (the "Assessment District"). Section 2. Engineer' s Report. The Resolution of Intention referred the acquisitions and improvements described therein to the person designated therein as the Engineer of Work and directed the Engineer of Work to prepare and file with the City Clerk a report (the "Engineer's Report") pursuant to the Act and containing information set forth in the Resolution of Intention, to which reference is hereby made for further particulars. Section 3. Engineer's Report Preliminarily Approved. The Engineer of Work has prepared and filed the Engineer's Report with the City Clerk, and this Council with the aid of City staff has reviewed the Engineer's Report, and hereby finds it to be sufficient for, and that it shall stand for purposes of subsequent proceedings for the Assessment District and the Engineer' s Report is hereby preliminaxily approved. Section 4. Meeting and Hearing Ordered. Pursuant to the Act, this Council hereby orders that a public meeting and a public hearing shall be held before this Council, in the regular meeting place thereof, Community Recreation Center 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The public meeting shall be held on January 23, 1996, at the hour of 7:00 o'elock p.m. for the purpose of allowing public testimony regarding the proposed assessments for the Assessment District. The public hearing shall be held on January 31, 1996, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. for the purposes of this Council's determination whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the acquisitions and improvements and this Council's final action upon the Engineer's Report and the assessments therein. Section 5. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the meeting and the hearing ordered under Section 4 hereof to be given by mailing, postage prepaid, in the United States mail, and such notice shall be deemed to have been given when so deposited in such mail. The envelope or cover of the mailing shall include the name of the City and the return address of the City Clerk as the sender. The mailed notice shall be given to all property owners within the Assessment District as shown in the Engineer's Report by such mailing by name to those persons whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized ] r:%agdrpt%95Xl 212%asst95-1 .reslajp assessment roll of the County of Riverside or the State Board of Equalization assessment roll, as the case may be. The notice shall include, but not be limited to, the estimated amount of assessment per parcel, a general description of the purpose or improvements that the assessment will fund and the address to which property owners may mail a protest against the assessment. The notice shall contain a statement of the total principal amount of unpaid assessments already levied against all the property in the Assessment District as computed in the Engineer's Report. The notice herein provided shall be mailed not less than forty-five (45) days before the date of the public hearing ordered under Section 4 hereof. Section 6. Boundary Map. The proposed boundaries of the proposed Assessment District are hereby described as shown on a map thereof on file in the office of the City Clerk (the "Boundary Map"), which indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory to be included in the proposed Assessment District and which Boundary Map shall govern for all details for further purposes of the proceedings for the Assessment District and to which reference is hereby made for further particulars. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to endorse upon the original and at least one copy of the Boundary Map the date of the filing thereof and date and adoption of this resolution and to cause a copy of the Boundary Map to be fLIed with the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, in which all of the proposed Assessment District is located, within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of this resolution, but in no event later than fifteen (15) days before the date of the public hearing ordered under Section 4 hereof. The County Recorder shall endorse upon the Boundary Map the time and date of filing and shah fasten the same securely in a book of maps of assessment and community facilities districts which the County Recorder shah keep in his or her office. The County Recorder shall index the Boundary Map by the name of the City and by the distinctive designation of the proposed Assessment District. r:\agdrpt\95\l 212\meet95.-1 .reelajp PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALWORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) as CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City' Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: - COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: - C OUNCILMEMBERS: 3 E\agdrpt%95H 212\neff95-1 .mslejp I'I'EM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager  Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer December 12, 1995 Reject All Bids and Re-advertise the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 PREPARED BY: ~r Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Reject all bids and authorize staff' to re-advertise the Waicott Corridor Project upon acquisition of the necessary right-of-way· 2. Authorize the City Clerk to return bid bonds to all bidders. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Walcott Corridor Project, PW94-10. This project will provide an all weather surface road (two travel lanes) from Nicolas Road to La Serena Way by way of Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos, and Walcott Road. The project also includes relocation of an existing 30" water main. The engineer's estimate for the street improvements and water main relocation is $1,583,000 and $837,000, respectively. 'This 'brings the total estimated project cost to $2,420,000. Eleven (11) bids for the project were publicly opened on August 24, 1995 and the results for. the base bid are as follows: Base Bid 1. Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction ................. $1,716,637.50 2. Utah Pacific Construction, Company ......... $1,905,175.00 3. TNT Grading Inc ....................... $1,905,523.43 4. Paul Hubbs Construction Co., Inc ............ $1,927,655.70 5. C.A. Rasmussen, Inc .................... $1,955,190.70 6. Greg J. Harris Construction ............... $1,963,896.80 pwO4~agd rpt\95 ~ 1128~pw94-10. awd 7. American Contracting, Inc ................ $1,972,284.15 8. Highgrade Engineering, Inc ................ $1,985,715.25 9. Commercial Contractors, Inc. dba Commercial Contractors Western Division., Inc.. $2,124,435.81 10. Vance Corporation ..................... $2,268,778.29 11. J. R. Pipeline Co., Inc .................... $2,389,004.25 After the bids were opened, several issues arose concerning the project. The apparent low bidder, Genesis Construction requested a revision to the contract that would increase his bid amount. The amounts being requested are for items that apparently not included in his original bid. Also, during the design process the property owner had agreed to dedicate the necessary right-of-way to connect the new improvements to the existing road. The property owner decided during the bid process that he would prefer that the city acquire the property necessary for the connection. We have therefore initiated proceedings to appraise and acquire the subject right-of-way. These proceedings will take several months to complete. Due to the issues outlined above we are recommending that all bids be rejected and that staff be authorized to re-advertise the project upon acquisition of the necessary property. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact at this time. This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded by Measure A and Development Impact Fees. The water main improvements will be paid for by R.C.W.D. pwO4~agd rpt\9 ,~ \ 1128~pw94-- 10 .awd ITEM 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager (~l~Joseph KicRk, Director of Public Works/City Engineer December 12, 1995 Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Traffic Signal Installation at Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79(S) (Project No. PW95-15) PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW95-15, Traffic Signal installation at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79(S) upon receiving Caltrans approval. BACKGROUND: The City Council has approved iristallation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79(S). This intersection is currently controlled with a four- way "Stop". The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is available to be advertised for construction. The project includes installation of a complete traffic signal and minor roadway modifications. The estimated construction cost for this project is $177,000. These plans are available for review in the City Engineer's office. This signalization project is within the Caltrans, County of Riverside and the City of Temecula right-of-way. Therefore, a multi-jurisdictional cooperation was necessary to expedite this project. The County has reviewed and approved the plans and Caltrans is processing the necessary encroachment permits. A tentative cooperative agreement has been developed between the County and the City in which the County will fund twenty-five percent (25%) and the City seventy-five percent (75%) of the engineering and construction cost of this project. Caltrans will operate and maintain the proposed signal system which will require a separate cooperative maintenance agreement. -1- r:~agd~t\95\1212~w95-15 .bid FISCAL IMPACT: This project is funded twenty-five percent (25%) by the County and the remaining seventy-five percent (75%) by the City through the Surface Transportation Program (STP), which is a federally funded program. -2- r:~agdrpt\9~\1212~95-15 .b/d I'IEM 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer December 12, 1995 Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of the Traffic Signals, Lighting, and Road Improvements at the Intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and State Route 79 (South) - Project No. PW95-15 PREPARED BY: ~' Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH FUNDING FOR INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA ROAD/REDHAWK PARKWAY AND SR-79 (S) BACKGROUND: The installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79 (S) has been approved by the City Council and is necessary for safe and orderly movement of traffic. This intersection is within the Caltrans, County of Riverside and the City of Temecula right-of- way. To finance this signalization project, the County and the City have reached a Cooperative Agreement. This Cooperative Agreement which obligates the County for twenty- five percent (25%) of the total cost and the City for the remaining seventy-five percent (75%), is attached. The City's share of the construction cost for this project is funded under the Surface Transportation Program (STP) which is a federally funded source. r.%agdfpt%95%1 21 2%coopagr. fes/ejp FISCAL IMPACT: The City's portion of the construction costs for this project is provided by STP funds. Attachment: 1. Resolution 95- 2. Cooperative Agreement r:~agdrpt%95%1212\coopagr. reslajp RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THR CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AIPROVING A COOPERATIVE AGRR~MENT BETWEEN THE COUN'I~ OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF TI~2VIF_,CUIA TO ESTABLISH FUNDING FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT THE INTERSF~TION OF MARGARITA ROAD/REDHAWK PARKWAY AND SR-79 6) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUIA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79 (S) has been approved by the City Council of the City of Temecula and, WltEREAS, this signal installation is necessary for safe and orderly movement of traffic and, WHEREAS, the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79 (S) is within the Caltrans, County of Riverside and the City of Temecula right-of-way and, WFIEREAS, a Cooperative Agreement for financing this signalization project has been developed between the County and the City and, WHEREAS, the Cooperative Agreement stipulates that the County finance twenty-five percent (25%) of the total project cost and the City the remaining seventy-five percent (75%). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City Council adopt a resolution and approve execution-of a . Cooperative Agreement between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula for financing installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway and SR-79 (s). Section 2. Authorize the mayor to sign and execute the Cooperative Agreement. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor c %agd rpt%H% 1212%coopug r. reel; ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: r:Aagdrpt%95%1 21 2%coopagr.res/ajp COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN AND' CONSTRUCTION OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS, LIGHTING AND ROAD IMPRO~N~ AT THF~ INTERSECTION OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) AND MARGARITA ROAD/RFTsHAWK PARKWAY This Agreement entered into this day of ,1995, is between the County of Riverside, referred to herein as "COUNTY", and the City of Temecula referred to herein as "CITY". RECITALS (1) COUNTY and CITY desire to install traffic control signals and safety lighting improvements, referred to herein as "PROJECT", at the intersection of State Route 79 (South) and Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway, and desire to specify the terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be engineered, constructed, financed, operated and maintained. (2) PROJECT intersection is jointly owned twelve. and one half percent (12.5%) by COUNTY, thirty-seven and one half percent (37.5%) by CITY, and fifty percent (50%) by STATE. (3) The State of California Department of Transpomtion (CALTRANS) will operate and maintain the signals and highway lighting under the terms and conditions of a separate Cooperative Maintenance Agreement. (4) It is anticipated that Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds wffi be allocated for financing seventy-five percent (75 %) of the construction costs and County Signal Mitigation Funds for financing twenty-five percent (25%) o:f the construction costs. CITY and COUNTY will bear the remainder of the costs as set forth herein. (5) It has been determined that the State of California pwmulgated traffic signal warrants~ have been met for the PROJECT intersection. Section I CITY AGREES: (1) To pay an amount equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of pROJECT construction and engineering costs. (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) To prepare plans, specifications, and estimates, referred to herein as "PS & E", for PROJECT, by employing CITY forces or constdtant, in accordance with the Standard Plans and Specifications of the State of California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), the standards and practices of COUNTY and all applicable laws and regulations. To assure that final design documents and drawings for PROJECT are prepared by or under the direction of a civil engineer registered and licensed in the State of California, and that the specifications, each set of plans and any reports shall bear the seal, certificate and signature of the professional engineer responsible for their preparation. To submit PS&E to COUNTY and CALTRANS for review and final approval. To identify and locate all high and low risk underground facilities, including above and below ground utilities and construction obstacles, to protect, remove, relocate or otherwise provide for such facilities, and to pay seventy-five percent (75 % ) of the costs thereof. To apply for any necessary encroachment permits for work within COUNTY'S and CALTRANS' right-of-way, in accordance with COUNTY and CALTRANS permit procedures. To advertise, award and administer a Public Works Contract for construction of PROJECT. To retain or cause to be retained for audit by COUNTY or other governmental 2 rAtrafi~,95~:o!aignl.agm/ll/29/951ajp (11) auditors for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment, all records and accounts relating to PROJECT. Upon completion of PROJECT, to furnish COUNTY and CALTRANS each a complete set of full-sized reproducible "Drawing of Record'' plans. To enter into an agreement with CALTRANS, whereby CALTRANS will agree to operate & maintain PROJECT, and CITY will pay fifty percent (50%) of the maintenance and energy costs for PROJECT. In the event of annexation of any portion of PROJECT by CITY the maintenance and energy costs shall be re, apportioned in accordance with the revised ownership shares. To acquire, furnish in fee, and fund one hundred percent (100%) of the costs for any necessary fight-of-way for PROJECT that is located within City jurisdiction. SECTION H COUNYY AGREES: (1) That COUNTY's share of the construction costs shall be an amount equal to twenty- five percent (25%) of the total actual construction costs, as determined after completion of the work and final accounting of costs. See Attachment "A" . (2) To deposit with CITY within twenty-five (25) days of receipt of billing thereof (which billing may be forwarded immediately following CITY's bid advertising date of a construction contract for PROJECT) the amount of $50,751 which figure represents COUNTY'S estimated share of the cost of preliminary engineering, construction engineering, utility negotiation, inspection, and construction, as required to complete PROJECT. In no event will COUNTY' s obligation for all anticipated costs under this Agreement exceed one hundred fifteen percent (115%) of the COUNTY's estimated costs, as listed in Exhibit "A", provided that COUNTY may, at its sole discretion, in " 3 r,~,nffs:~9S~zVsign1.qm/ll/29/95/sjp writing, authorize a greater amount. However, this does not obligate the CITY in any way to provide additional funds for this PROJECT. (3) To provide CITY with necessary policies, practices, procedures, specifications and other standards required for the preparation of PS&E, for PROJECT. (4) To provide, as appropriate, prompt review and approval of submittals by CITY and to cooperate in timely processing of PS&E. (5) To issue free of charge, upon application by CITY, the necessary Encroachment Permits for required work within the COUNTY'S right-of-way. (6) To enter into an agreement with CITY, whereby COUNTY will pay twelve and one half percent (12.5 %) of the maintenance and energy costs for PROJECT. In the event of annexation of any portion of PROJECT by CITY the maintenance and energy costs shall be reapportioned in accordance with the revised ownership shares. (7) To acquire, furnish in fee and fund one hundred percent (100%) of the costs for any necessary right-of-way for PROJECT that is located within COUNTY jurisdiction. (8) To pay twenty-five percent (25%) of the costs of any work necessitated by the presence of high and low risk underground facilities. Section HI IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: (1) The total cost of PROJECT is estimated to be $221,640 (See Attachment 'A"). (2) Construction by CITY of any portion of PROJECT which lies within COUNTY right- of-way or affects COUNTY facilities, shall not be commenced until the phns involving such construction have been reviewed and approved by signature by C1TY'S Director of Public Works, or a delegated agent, and COUNTY'S Director of Transportation, or a delegated agent and until an Encroachment Permit authorizing. such construction has been provided to C1TY by COUNTY. (3) In the event that CITY awards construction contract for PROJECT prior to approval 4 r.~nffw~,gS~signl.a~n/ll/29/gS/ajl~ (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) O) by COUNTY of contract PS&E, COUNTY may, at its sole discretion, either terminate the contract by written notice, or limit COUNTY funding of project to those COUNTY costs as described in Exhibit *A" , with no formal notice by COUNTY to CITY required for said limitation of COUNTY funding. If, upon opening bids for construction of PROJECT, and if bids indicate a cost overrun of no more than fifteen percent (15%) of the construction cost estimate as described in Attachment "A" will occur, CITY may award the contract. If, upon opening of bids, it is found that a cost overrun exceeding fifteen (15%) of the construction cost estimate will occur, CITY and COUNTY shall endeavor to agree upon an alternative course of action. If, after thirty (30) calendar days from the date of bid opening, an alternative course of action is not agreed upon, this agreement shall be deemed to be terminated by mutual consent, with each agency sharing incurred costs in accordance with the cost shares as set forth in Section I, Article (1), Section II, Article (1) and Section III, Article (1). CITY shall not award a contract to construct PROJECT until after receipt of the COUNTY'S deposit required in Section II (3). All contract change orders exceeding fifteen percent (15%) of the bid price for the relevant contract bid items shall be submitted by CITY to COUNTY for review and approval prior to authorization by CITY to construction contractor. During construction, of said work, CITY will furnish a representative to perform the function of Resident Engineer, and COUNTY may furnish a representative. COUNTY's representative may consult with CITY's representative, but the CITY's decision shall be final. No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by both parties, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on either party hereto. 5 r. Xta'tffk:\95Xeopaignl .agm/l 1/29/9Slajp (10) (11) (12) IIII IIII Upon completion of all work under this Agreement, ownership and title to all materials, equipment, and appurtenances installed shall be shared among COUNTY, CITY and CALTRANS in accordance with ownership shares. Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is further agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify and hold COUNTY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. Neither CITY nor any officer or .e. mployee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY under this Agreement. It is also agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, COUNTY shall fully indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY under this Agreement. r:.~raf~95~sigul.agm/l 1/29/95/ajp Notices: Any notice required to be sent pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent by regular mail, addressed as follows: City of Temecula Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer County of Riverside David E. Barnha, Director of Transportation P.O. Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92052 CITY OF TEMECULA Dated: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Dated: By: Attest: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Chairman, Board of Supervisors Attest: Gerald Maloney, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors · By: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney By: Deputy Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: William C. Katzenstein, County Counsel By: Deputy County Counsel 7 r:.~afficX95k~siSnl.qm/l 1/29/951ajp SIGNAL LOCATION STATE ROUTE 79 (SOUTH) AND MARGARITA ROADfREDHAWK PARKWAY Construction Cost $ Preliminary Engineering 7.7% BRW Contract TPC/O'Rourke Contract Construction Engineering 15% TOTALS: City' s 'share of TPC\ O'Rouke Contract paid by County EXHIBIT' ESTIMATE OF COST TOTAL COSTS COUNTY SHARE (100%) (25%) 177,000.00 $ 44,250.00 $ 13,630.00 $ 3,407.50 $ 4,460.00 $ 1,115.00 $ 26.550.00 $ 6.637.50 $ 221.640.00 $ 55.410.00 $ $ -3,345.00 BALANCE: $ 221.640.00 $ 50.751.00 CITY SHARE (75%) $132,750.00 $ 10,222.50 $ 3,345.00 $ 19.912.50 $166.230.00 $ 0.00 $166.229.00 8 r..\ttaf~\95k~l,iVfi.agm/llr29/95/ajp ITEM 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT' TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager .~'~joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer December 12, 1995 Completion and Acceptance of the Moraga Road Street Widening, Project No. PW92-10 PREPARED BY:/~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the Moraga Road Street Widening, Project No. PW92-10, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: 1. File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year 'Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and 2. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On March 14, 1995, the City Council awarded a contract for the Moraga Road Street Widening, Project No. PW92-10, to Ronald L. Harris Construction for $102,721.00. The project which widen the west side of Moraga Road between Margarita Road and Rancho California Road included the extension of a double box culvert, grading of the channel, providing additional pavement and striping and placing landscaping along the channel banks. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. r:~agdtpt\95\1212~/2-10.ac~ FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amount for this project was $102,721.00. Contract Change Orders No. I and 2 were approved by the City Manager in the amount of $5,838.48. Also the final field quantities for various bid items increased by $2,020.94 bringing the total construction cost to $110,580.42. This will leave a balance of $2,412.68 in the project's contingency. Sufficient funds have been transferred from Measure A to the Capital Improvement Fund, account #210-165-625-5804. Attachment: Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Contractor's Affidavit r:~agdtpt\95\1212~92-10.g RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 hiram Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE TH; UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Ronald L. Harris Construction to perform the following work of improvement: Moraga Road Street Widening 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on December 12, 1995. That upon said contract the Continental Casualty Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 92-10. 6. The street address of said property is: West side of Moraga Road between Margarita Road and Rancho California Road. Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of · 1995. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I,. June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this day of ,1995. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk Forms/C1P-00l Roy. 12-5-<)1 pwO4\pw92~pw92-10\completn.not 112995 BOND: 137803689 PREMIUM: $ 50, O0 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE BOND pROJECT NO. PW92-10 MORA GA ROAD WIDENING KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE pRESENTS THAT: RONALD L. HARRIS CONSTRUCTION, 1756 PUEBLO CREST, LA HABRA, CA 90631 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR ~ND~VIDUAL , hereinefter called Principal, and a (fillin ,~hztl. ra ~, Pa, u.; ~/aii; orindividuell CONTINENTA~ CASUALT~ COMPAre. P,O. BOX 2800, BRF. A. CA NAME AND ADDtLFSS OF SURETY hereinafter called SURETY, are held and firmly bound Re CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter cared OWNER, inthe penal sum of ELEVEN THOUSAND FZFTY EZGHT DOLLARS DOLLARS CBIT$ |$ 11,058.00 } in lawful money of the United States, for the paymere ul to be made, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns, jointly and which sum wall and try severally, firmly by these presents. Corrtract with the , reof for the construction of RtO,l~llO ~-IOMORAGA hereto attached and made a pert he ' -' WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal wi furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of J29g year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER, against an de~ccts in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period: and WHEREAS. the Mid Contract has been completed, end wee sOproved on NOVEMBER 28 , 19 9_2_5- NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBUGATION I$ SUCH, that if within one mr hem the-date of aOproval of the said Contract, the work done under ~he terms of said Contract stall disclose poe' workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective matefiats were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and vii, otherwise this instrun~nt shall be void. Signed end sealed this 28THday of NOVEMBER · 19 95 . (Seal) SURETY By: CONTINENTIAL CASUALTY COMPANY (Ns~le) DWIGHT REILLY (1'~3e| ATTORNEY IN FACT APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney PRINtPAL By: RONALD L. HARRI~ CONSTRUCTION By: (Name) Continental Casualty Company CNA For All the Commitments )bu Make' AN ILLINOIS CORORATION POWER OF ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT Know All Men by these Presents, That CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws fl of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in the City of Chicago, and State .o Ilinois, a. nd having its pnn. ciDal office in the City of Chicagc, and State of Illinois, does hereby make, constitute and appoint Dw3 qht Rel 11 y, I ndl vl clual I y of Aliso Viejo, California its true and lawful Attorney-in-fact with full Dower and authority hereby conferred to sign, seal and execute in its behalf bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of similar nature - In Unlimited Amounts - and to bind CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY thereby as/ully and to the same extent as it such instruments were signed by the duly authorized officers of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and all the acts of said Attorney, pursuant to the authority hereby given are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By-Law duly adopted by the Board of Directors of me Company. "Article IX--Execution of Documents Section 3. Appointment of Attorney-in-fact The Chairman of the Boarcl of Directors, the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President may, from time to time, appoint by written certificates attorneys-in-fact to act in behalf of the Company in the execution of policies of insurance, bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of like nature. Such attorneys-in-fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective certificates of authority, shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution f of any such instruments and to attach the seal of the Corn any thereto. The Chairman of the Board o Directors, the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President or the Board of ~irectors, may, at any time, revoke all power and authority previously given to any attorney-in-fact" This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 17th day of February, 1993. "Resolved, that the signature of the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President and the seal of the Company raP' be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney granted pursuant to Section 3 of Article IX of the By-Laws, and the signature of t Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any certificate of any such power aL any such power or certificate bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company. Any such power so executed and sealed and certified by certificate so executed and sealed shall, with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, continue to be valid and binding on the Company." State of Illinois } ~ County of Cook ss On this 2rid day of May CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY ~..~ Group Vice Pr:sident ,19 94 , before me personally came M.C. Vonnahme. to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he resi0es in the Village of Downers Grove, State of Illinois; that ne is a Group Vice President of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of said Corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed pursuant to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto pursuant to like authority, and acknowledges same to be the act and need of said corporation. ~c* a,,,,, l, Jonn M. Littier. Assistant Secreta~ of CONTINENTAL CASUAL~ COMPANY, do ceffify that the Power of Attorne ~above set fo~h )s still in force. and runner cenify mat Section 3 of me ARicie IX of the By-Laws of the Company and me Resolution orthe Board of Directors, set forth In said Power of Attorney are still in force. In testimony whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the said Company this 28TH day of NOVEMBER Form 1-23142-B 95 . As~'~istant Secretary. INV. NO.G-56623-C STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BEe.NAmYrNO NOVEMBER 28, 1995 On , before me, J. JOB)ISTON Notary Public, personally appeared DWIGHT REILLY XZX personally known to me - OR - __ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.  ~~~d official seal. Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the data Deiow is not requ,rec~ Dy law, it may prove valuaDle to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulenl reaTIacnmenl of th~s form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Ind~woual Corporale Ofl',cer Title(s) __ Pa.'Iner(s) __L~meled __GeneraJ ~ A~ornev-ln-Fact __ Trustee(s) GuarO~andConservator Other: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: Name of Person(s) or Entity0es) CONTTNENTAL CASUALTY COEBAI',TY TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT 2 NUMBER OF PAGES NOVEMBER 28, 1995 DATE OF DOCUMENT PRINCIPAL SIGNER(S) OTHERTHANNAMEDAEOVE State Of California County of San Diego On/~Af/-~'/~./5~/" ~,~; , 1995 before me, Beverly J. SchliU, No~ Public, person~lyappe~~~ ~.~~f~ , [ ] ~rson~ly ~own m me - OR - IX] prov~ m me on ~e basis of ~sfacm~ evidence be ~e person whose name is ~bsc~bed to ~e ~in imminent ~d ac~owle~ge~ to me ~at she execu~d ~e ~me in her au~o~ capacid, and ~at by her si~mre on ~e intomerit ~e ~rson or ~e en~ u~n behalf of which ~e person acted, ex~uted ~e ins~ment. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Bev~r~~tary Public BEVERLY 3.'?.S~ j t ~ NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA ~ tr COMMISSION NUMBER ~87056 ':" II I[ OPTIONAL DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT //~O]: DOC~Y'$7//~%MENT NO. OF PAGES CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [ ] INDIVIDUAL [ ] CORPORATE OFFICER [ ] PARTNER [ ] LIMITED [ ] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [ ] 'TRUSTEE [ ] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ,~ OTHER://~/7~ /""' SIGNER IS REPRESZG: TITLE [ ] GENERAL NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PROJECT NO. PW92-10 MORA GA ROAD WIDENING This is to certify that ~ 7~ C l' I ~ , "CONTRACT.OR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that heat has paid in full for all materials, supOlies, labor, se~ices, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of it's contra~ with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that ce~ain work of improvement known as ~OJE~ NO. ~92-10 MO~ RO~ ~DB~G situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more pa~icularly described as follows: ~TLE OF WORK HERE The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising o~ of uid Contract which would constit~e grounds for any third pa~y to claim a stop notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR. Fu~her, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and. all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the CONTRACTOR has not disputlad above. Dated: Print Name and Title RELEASE R-1 pwO4~iplprojectm%pw92-10~idPkg 112994 ITEM 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINA~v~AENDAI . CITY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer December 12, 1995 Professional Services Agreement for Geotechnical Observation and Testing with Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc., for Project No. PW95-09, Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84. PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Edward Stone, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc., for Geotechnical Observation and Testing for Project No. PW95-09, Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84 for an amount not to exceed $33,649.00, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; BACKGROUND: On November 14, 1995, the City Council approved the award of a construction contract for Project No. PW95-09, Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84 to Great West Contractors, Inc.. These services are required in conjunction with the rough grading, mainline sewer improvements, Pauba Road improvements, and special inspections required by the Building Code for concrete, masonry, and structural welding. A request for proposal (RFP) for Professional Services was prepared for the Geotechnical Observation and Testing portion of this project. The four (4) geotechnical firms submitted proposals for these services. Proposals were reviewed and a contract was negotiated with Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc., who was selected to provide the required services. The geotechnical consultant will perform grading observation and testing, trench backfill compaction testing, inspection and testing of concrete, masonry, structural steel welding inspection and preparation of a final report as stated in exhibit "A" of the contract. -1- r:~agdtpt\95~lO12~agdtpt FISCAL IMPACT: The Fire Station facility and site improvements will be funded by Fire Mitigation funds budgeted in the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 1995-1996, Account No. 210- 190-626-5804,and the improvements to Pauba Road will be funded with Development Impact Fees, account No. 210-165-660-5804 ATTACHMENT: Professional Services Agreement -2- r:~agdrpt\95\1212\geoagd~t CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of December 12, 1995, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers CConsultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on December 12, 1995 and shall remain and continue in effect antil tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 12, 1996, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Thirty Three Thousand, Six Hundred Forty Nine dollars ($33,649.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is · approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City' s written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance-of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.' Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of. each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give - 1 - r.. ~ci!~\projecla~t~v95-09\le. oaln~t written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant' s control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service . upon it of said. notice in which tO dure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be enti~ed at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to' the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the fight to. examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as -2 - r. \~ip\projc~\pw95-Og~geoqrmt necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, dam, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this' Agreemerit, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 9. INSURANCE REOUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or'in connection with the performance of the work her. under by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shah be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 000l). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) coveting Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's profession. ' than: be Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less '3- r..\cip\projecla~pw95-O9\Seo~m~ (D General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general. aggregate limit is used, either the genera/aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,0013,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. -4- r: \cip~projects~pw95-Og\ge,~qnnt (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against Whom claim is made or suit is bwught, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of ConsUltant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. : : '5- r:~cip\projects~p~v95-Og\geongnnt 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To City: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To Consultant: Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc. 27463 Enterprise Circle West Temecula, CA. 92590 Attention: James R. Harrison 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers shall perform the services described in this Agreement. '6- r: \cip\projects\pwgS-09\geoagn~t Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of James R. Harrison from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year fLrSt above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor -'7- r: \cip\projec~\pw95-09~ge~mgrmt Attest: June S. Greek City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney CONSULTANT GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINF~ By: EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED '9- ~-\cip~projcctfipwg~.Og~l~oelmt For this project we will apply the Technician II rate of $47.00/hr for our Senior Technicians. We propose the following scope of services for rough grading control, utility trench backfill testing, street improvement testing and structural inspection during site improvements: SCOPE OF SERVICES Observation and Testing - Rough Grading, Building Site (Full Time) · Senior Technician (176 hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $7,144.00 Inspections of Overexcavations and Slopes · Project Engineer/Geologist (16 hrs @ $62/hr) ..................... $992.00 Trench Backfill Testing (Part Time - On Call) · Senior Technician (30 hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $1,175.00 Parking Area Subgrade, Base & Asphalt Density Testing(3 Visits/2 hrs per Visit) · Senior Technician (6 hrs @ $47/hr) ............................ $282.00 Observation and Testing - Rough Grading, Pauba Road (Full Time) · Senior Technician (104 hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $4,465.00 Pauba Road Sewer Trench Backfill Testing · Senior Technician (115 hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $5,405.00 Pauba Road Subgrade, Base & Asphalt Densities · Senior Technician (12 hrs @ $47/hr) ........................... $564.00 Geotechnical-Footing Inspection, Building · Senior Geologist/Engineer (2 hrs @ $60/hr) ...................... $120.00 Concrete Slab Inspection, Cast Cylinders and Slump Testing · Senior Technician (12 hrs @ $47/hr) ........................... $564.00 Masonry Inspection, Apparatus Room, Retaining Wall .and Brick Veneer (full time per UBC)/Casting Concrete Cylinders · Deputy Inspector (160 .hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $6,580.00 Roofing Inspection-Bufltup Areas · Deputy Inspector (16 Hrs @ $47/hr) ........................... $752.00 Structural Steel, Welding Inspection, Apparatus Room · Deputy Inspector (40 hrs @ $47/hr) ........................... $1,504.00 Laboratory Testing · Maximum Density (4 tests @ $100 each) ........................ $400.00 · Compressire Strength Testing · Concrete Cylinder 6X12 1~66) ........................... $1,188.00 · Grout Prisms Single Block (4) ........................... $160.00 · Reinforcing Steel · Tensile Strength (4)'. .................................. $252.00 · Bend Strength (4) .................................... $252.00 Final Report Preparation (1 report in 6 copies) .............. Lump Sum $1.850.00 Total ............................ $,33,649.00 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. Proposal 95-85 EXRBFF B PAYMENT SCHEDULE Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, GEOTECHNICAL FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY GEO TECHNICAL, MATERIAL INSPECTION, AND TESTING SERVICES Principal Engineer / Geologist ........................................................ $100 per hour Associate Engineor / Geologist ....................................................... $ 95 per hour Senior Engineer / Geologist .......................................................... $ 80 per hour Project Engineer / Geologist ......................................................... $ 70 per hour Senior Staff Engineer / Geologist .................................... · .................. $ 62 per hour Staff Engineer / Geologist ........................................................... $ 55 per hour Field Director .................................................................... $ 60 per hour Senior Technician (Field I Laboratory) .................................................. $ Technician II ..................................................................... $ Technician I ..................................................................... $ Draftsperson ..................................................................... $ Clerical ......................................................................... $ Deputy Inspector .................................................................. $ SPECIAL EQUIPMENT 55 per hour 47 per hour 43 per hour 43 per hour 35 per hour 47 per hour On-Site Vehicle Charges ............................................................ $ 4 per hour Portable Refraction Seismograph ........................................... $ 40 per hour/$ 200 per day Nuclear Moisture Density Gage ............................................. $ 5 per hourIS 25 per day Road Rater (Pavement Deflection Testing) ............................................. By Arrangement Other Geophysical Equipment ..................... · .................................. By Anangement LABORATORY UNIT PRICES Soft Moisture Content ............................................................ $ Sieve Analysis (+4 or -4) ..................................................... : .... $ Sand Equivalent ................................................................ $ #200 Wash .................................................................... $ Hydrometer With Sieve ............................................................ $ Plasticity Index ............. .................................................... $ 10 Unit Price 48 Unit Price 43 Unit Price 30 Unit Price 90 Unit Price 78 Unit Price Moisture I Density (Ring) .......................................................... $ 18 Unit Price Maximum Density ............................................................... $100 Unit Price Maximum Density (Modified) ....................................................... $110 Unit Price Direct Shear ................................................................... $140 Unit Price Conso~dation (W/O 7~me Rate) ..................................................... $100 Unit Price With Time Rate, Add: (Per increment) ................................................. $ 25 Per Incrmt Expansion Index ................................................................ $ 85 Unit Price R-Value ............................. '.. '. ....................................... $185 Unit Price Sulfate .............................. °. ........................................ $ 37 Unit Price Corrosivity ..................................................................... $ 90 Unit Price Permeability (Falling or Constant Head) ............................................... $150 Unit Price Compression Tests - Concrete Cylinders .............................................. $ 18 Unit Price Extraction Tests - Hot Mix Asphalt ................................................... $165 Unit Price Specific Gravity- Soft and Aggregate Base ............................................. $ 65 Unit Price Stability and Air Voids - Hot Mix Asphalt ............................................... $180 Unit Price Mix Design - Hot Mix Asphalt and Concrete ............................................ By Arrangement TERMS OF PAYMENT Invoices rendered for professional services ere due upon presentation. A sen/ice charge of 1.5 percent'per month may be charged on accounts not paid within 30 days to cover additional processing and carrying costs. Any attomey's fees or o~er costs incurred in co~ecting any delinquent account will be paid by the client. An overtime charge of 33.3% ~f hourly rates will be added for time in excess of 8 hours per day (excluding travel) and time before 7:00 a.m. and after 5 p.m. or on Saturdays. An overtime charge of 50% will be charged for time in excess of 12 hours per day and on Sundays or legal holidays. Charges for travel to or from project are free up to a maximz)m of II2 hour each way. All travel time m excess of 1/2 hour each way will be charged at straight time. 27447 Enterprise Circle West . Tcmccula · CA 92590 . TEL ( 909 ) 676,8337 · FAX ( 909 ) 676,4583 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES. OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD NOVEMBER 28, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:43 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Ron Roberrs presiding. ' ROLL CALL PRESENT: ABSENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Stone abstaining. .Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995. DISTRICT BUSINESS 2. Naming of a Newly Acquired Park Site Community Services Deputy Director Herman Parker presented the staff report. Jeff Comerchero, Chairman of Community Services Commission, addressed the Board of Directors regarding their decision to recommend naming the new park "The Duck Pond." He listed the Commission's reasons as preservation of heritage for the property and the accepted traditional name has always been Duck Pond. He suggested that David Dixon's legacy be memorialized in another appropriate area of the City. Patricia Keller, P.O. Box 521, requested the City retain the name of "The Duck Pond", or if another name is contemplated, that a name contest be held to allow the r:\minutes.csd~l 12895 - ' -1- children the opportunity to name the park. Director Birdsall suggested the park be called "The David F. Dixon Memorial Park" with "The Duck Pond" underneath. She stated she received numerous phone calls in favor of this suggestion. Director Stone stated that although he believes it is a thoughtful gesture and although he did admire David Dixon's efforts and talents, he believes the gateway to the community is not an appropriate place for this memorial. He suggested that a more appropriate place would be in the new City Hall. President Roberts suggested that the name of the park be "The Temecula Duck Pond." RECESS President Roberts called a brief recess at 8:00 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 8:01 PM. Director Parks stated he is in favor of the name the "The Temecula Duck Pond" but requested that staff diligently pursue another location for a memorial to David F. Dixon. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to name the newly acquire park site "The Temecula Duck Pond." The motion was unanimously carried. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Director Shawn Nelson reported that on December 1 st, at 6:00 PM, the Santa Electric Light Parade will be held. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT Director Birdsall announced she has been appointed to the Community Services Committee of the League of California Cities. r:\minutes.csd\l 12895 -2- ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:12 PM to a meeting on December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Ronald H. Roberts, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ District Secretary r:\minutes.csd\l 12895 -3- ITEM 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Temecula Community Services District General Manager December 12, 1995 Election of Community Services District Officers for 1996 PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk 1. Entertain motions from the Board of Directors to select the President to preside until the end of calendar year 1996. 2. Entertain motions from the Board of Directors to elect the Vice President who will assume the duties of the President in the President's absence and will hold this office until the end of calendar year 1996. RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: The Community Services District Board of Directors selects a member to serve as President and Vice President annually. These offices are assumed at the first meeting of the Community Services District in January and the newly elected officers preside through the calendar year of 1996. R:~aeerda.rl~t~Meyer I REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV/~,L CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFF! R CITY MANAGERS, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager December 12, 1995 Advanced Chemill Systems Owner Participation Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 1) That the Redevelopment Agency and the board members adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95- DISCUSSION: A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ADVANCED CHEMILL SYSTEMS, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Advanced Chemill Systems operates a facility that manufactures equipment for semiconductors in Temecula. They have recently relocated from Corona to Temecula. The facility, which consists of a 13,000 square foot building, and appurtenant equipment will employ fifty five (55) employees within two years of the initiation of business in Temecula. The average salary of these positions will be $20,800 per year. Advanced Chemill Systems is requesting $10,000 from the Redevelopment Agency to offset moving expenses. The Agency agrees to reimburse Advanced Chemill Systems a total of $10,000 relocation expenses subject to maintaining operation at the facility for a minimum of five (5) years and shall continuously employ not less than thirty (30) full-time employees within two (2) years from the date of initiation of business activities at the facility. If the conditions are not met, the company must repay the $10,000. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95 - A RESOLUTION OF THE IIFX}EVFJ~OPMENT AGENCY OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE R~r}EVELOPMF~NT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ADVANCED CHEMILL SYSTEMS, A CM. IFORNIA CORPOI~TION THE I~FJ}EVELOPlV!ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY. OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. Advanced ChemiH Systems (Participant) has relocated from Corona to Temecula to a 13,099 sq. ft. building facility. B. The total cost of the relocation to the new facility is not less than $10,000. C. Once fully equipped and operating, the facility will create a total of fifty five (55) positions; thirty (30) of which will result from their relocation to Temecula. The average salary of these positions will be $20,800 per year. D. In order to induce Participant to remain in the Facility in Temecula, expand the business operations, and thereby eliminate blight and generate employment opportunities in the Project Area, the Participant needs the assistance of the Agency in helping to offset the costs of relocation. E. Pursuant to § 33444.6 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Redevelopment Agency finds that the proposed financial assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the relocation of Advanced Chemill Systems to the City of Temecula; and that the relocation assistance could not be obtained on economically feasible terms from the private market. This finding is based on the fact that without the financial assistance proposed by the Redevelopment Agency, the Facility would not relocate to the City of Temecula creating a substantial loss of jobs, sales tax and property tax revenue for the City, County, and State. Section 2. Based upon the above findings, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby appwves the Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Advanced Chemill Systems, a California Corporation. LAX2:I25594.1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting on the __ day of 1995. Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, Agency Secretary of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. RDA 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __ day of ,1995, by the following vote: AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: AGENCY MEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk LAX2:115594.1 2 THIS OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into and effective as of , 1995 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body corporate and politic (the "Agency") and ADVANCED CHEMILL SYSTEMS, a California Corporation (the "Participant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the Agency and the Participant hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Recitals The parties enter into this Agreement on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions: a. The purpose of this Agreement is to effectuate the Redevelopment'Plan (the "Plan") for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1 (the "Project Area") by providing for the elimination of blight in the Project Area and for economic revitalization within ~he Project Area through the stimulation of new and expanded business activity and the creation of 'employment opportunities. b. Participant is prepared to conduct a business at the Site which will enhance the goals of the Agency in eliminating blight and creating employment opportunities in the Project Area: c. Participant presently has on the Site one building of appwximately 13,000 square feet (the "Facility'), used to manufacture equipment for the semiconductor industry. Participant presently employs twenty-five (25) full-time employees. Participant proposes'to expand its operations at the site by adding a minimum of thirty (30) full-time employees within two years of the initiation of business activities at the Facility. d. This Agreement is entered into for the purpose of inducing the Participant to relocate its business to the City of Temecuh and to operate a business at the Site and not for speculation in land holding. e. This Agreement pertains to and affects the ability of the Agency to finance its shamtory obligations and for all parties to finance and carry out the purposes of this Agreement and the goals of the Plan and is intended to be a contract within the meaning of Government Code § 53511. LAX2:125595.2 Seplmi~ 5, 1995 Section 2. The Redevelopmerit Plan The Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area was approved by Ordinance No. 658 of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County on July 12, 1988, prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-11, which became effective May 9, 1991, and City Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City approved the Plan. Said Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over said Plan to the Agency, as of July 1, 1991. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 93-04 and 94-03, Ordinance No. 91-11 was codified at § 8.04.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code. The Plan was amended by Ordinance No.. 94-33, adopted on December 20, 1994. Section 3. The Site The Site is located at 43153 Business Park Drive, City of Temecula which is within the Project Area. Section 4. Parties to the Agreement a. The Agency is a public body, corporate and politic, exercising governmental functions and powers and is organized and existing under the Community Redevelopment law of the State of California (§ 33000, et sea_., Health and Safety Code; the "Act"). The principal office and mailing address of the Agency is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. All references to approvals by the Agency shall mean the Agency Board, unless another Agency Officer is specifically designated in this Agreement. b. The Participant is a California corporation duly organized and existing under the hws of the State of California. The principal office and mailing address of the Participant is: Advanced Chemill Systems, 43153 Business Park Drive, Temecuh, California 92590. Participant is the record owner of the Site and therdore qualifies as an "Owner Participant" within the meaning of the Redevelopmerit Plan and the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code § 33000, et sea_.). Section 5. Agency and Participant Obligations a. In order to induce Participant to relocate its business to the City of Temecula, to remain in business at the Facility and to expand business activities, the Agency agrees to reimburse the Participant a total of $10,000 relocafion expenses incurred in connection with the move of the business from the City of Cowna to the Facility in the City of Temecula, subject to the following conditions: (1) Participant shall operate the Facility to produce equipment for the semiconductor industry or substantially similar products for a 25595.2 ~ s, ~99s 2 minimum of five (5) years from the date of the initiation of business activities at the Facility; and (2) Participant shall add and continuously employ not less than t!firty (30) full-time employees within two (2) years from the date of initiation of business activities at the Facility. The parties hereto agree that the *date of initiation of business activities at the Facility* as used in this Agreement is April, 1995. b. Participant warrants and represents that any information it has supplied to the Agency pertaining to the relocation of Advanced Chemill Systems is true, correct and complete in all material respects. Participant represents that any projection, including but not limited to information concerning the projected job creation resulting from the Facility contained at Section 1, is true, correct and complete in all material respects according to the best available information. c. In the event the Participant fails to comply with the conditions set forth in this section, the Agency may demand that Participant repay the $10,000 relocation payment to the Agency within thirty (30) days of the Agency's demand for such payment, subject to the default provisions of this Agreement. Section 6. Anti-Discrimination Obli~,ations The Participant agrees by and for itself and any successors in interest that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, age, handicap, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Site, nor shall the Participant itself or any person claiming under or through it establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the Site. Section 7. Notices. Demands. and Communications Amont, the Parties Written notices, demands and communications between the Agency and the Participant, shall be sufficiently given by personal service or' dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the principal offices of the Agency or the Participant described in Section 4. Such written notices, demands and communications may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate by mail as provided in this Section. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, notice personally served shall be deemed to have been received as of the date of such service. LAX2:125595.2 Sepu~ber 5, 1995 3 Section 8. Enforced Delay: Extension of Tames of Performance a. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by any party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default, and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement shall be extended, where the party seeking the extension has acted diligen~y and delays or defaults are due to events beyond the reasonable control of the party such as but not limited to: war, insurrection, strikes, lockouts, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, casualties, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, intergalactic invasion, lack of transportation, litigation, unusually severe weather, or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the party claiming an extension of time to perform. b. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, an extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty (30) days of the commencement of the cause. c. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of the Executive Director of the Agency and the Participant. Section 9. Inspection of Books and Records Each party has the right to inspect, at reasonable times, the books and records of the other parties pertaining to the Site as pertinent to the purposes of the Agreement. Section 10. Indemnification The Participant shall defend, indemnify, assume all responsibility for and hold the Agency, and its respective elected and appointed officers and employees, harmless from all costs (including attomcy's fees and costs), claims, demands or liabilities judgments for injury or damage to property and injuries to persons, including death, which may be caused by any of the Participant's activities under this Agreement and on the Site, whether such activities or performance thereof be by the Participant or anyone direc~y or indirec~y employed or contracted with by the Participant and whether such damage shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement. This indemnity includes, but is not limited to, any repair, cleanup, remediation, detoxi~cation, or preparation and implementation of any removal, remedial, response, closure or other plan (regardless of whether undertaken duc to governmental action) concerning any hazardous substance or h~7~rdous wastes including petroleum and its fractions as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ["CERCLA"; 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et se~_.], the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ["RCRA"; 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et sea_.] and California Health and Safety Code Section Code Section 25280 et seo_. at any place where Participant owns or has control of real property ,5595.2 sq,~m~r 5, 1995 4 pursuant to any of Participant's activities under this Agreement. The foregoing indemnity is intended to operate as an agreement pursuant to Section 107(e) of CERCLA and California Health and Safety Code Section 25364 to assure, protect, hold harmless and indemnify Agency from liability. Section 11. Defaults - General a. The failure or delay by either party to perform any term or provision of this Agreement constitutes a default under this Agreement. A party claiming a default (claimant) shall give written notice of default to the other party, specifying the default complained of. The defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days within which to cure the default. b. In the event the Participant fails to cure the default, the Agency may terminate this Agreement upon two (2) business days notice to Participant. 'In the event the Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the Participant shall repay to the Agency all funds paid by the Agency to Participant pursuant to this Agreement within thirty (30) days of the demand for such funds. Section 12. Le?al Actions a. In the event a default is not cured as provided in this Agreement, the non- defaulting party may exercise all rights and remedies available to it by law. b. In the event such litigation is ~ed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court' s judgment, shall be enti~ed to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. c. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. ' d. Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by any party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the. exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. e. Any failures or delays by any party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies, or deprive any such party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies. LAX2:12~595.2 Sep~mbct$,l~5 5 Section 13. Compliance With AH Laws and Regulations The Participant shall carry out the provisions of this Agreement in conformity with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations, including, without limitation, such laws and regulations pertaining to the payment of prevailing wages which might be applicable to its obligations. Section 14. Entire Agreement. Waivers & General a. This Agreement is executed in duplicate originals, each of which is deemed to be an original. This Agreement includes pages 1 through 7, which constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties. b. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties or their predecessors in interest with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. c. All amendments hereto must be in writing executed by the appropriate authorities of the Agency and the Participant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. I~FJ3EVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA 'By: RONALD PARKS Chairperson ATTEST: ~:125595.2 Sc~cmbct 5, 199~ 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM: PETER M. THORSON General Counsel ADVANCRD CHEMILL SYSTEMS, INC., a C_nllfornia Corporation LAX2:I2559S.2 ~ 5, 1995 7 ITEM 2 CITY MANAGER~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Temecula Redevelopment Agency FROM: Executive Director DATE: December 12, 1995 SUBJECT: Election of Redevelopment Agency Officers for 1996 PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: 1. Entertain motions from the Agency members to select the Chairperson to preside until the end of calendar year 1996. Entertain motions from the Agency members to elect the Vice Chairperson who will assume the duties of the Chairperson in the Chairperson's absence and will hold this office until the end of calendar year 1996. BACKGROUND: The Redevelopment Agency selects a member to serve as Chairperson and Vice Chairperson annually. These offices are assumed at the first meeting of the Redevelopment Agency in January and the newly elected officers preside through the calendar year of 1996. ITEM 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Redevelopment Agency Board Members Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager December 12, 1995 Professional Hospital Supply Owner Participation Agreement RECOMMENDATION: Continue a public hearing for Professional Hospital Supply Owner Participation Agreement to December 19, 1995. DISCUSSION: Staff recommends that the item be continued as a portion of the Owner Participation Agreement has not been finalized. OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY HELD NOVEMBER 28, 1995 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 8:55 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 5 ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall BOARD MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995. It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Parks to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone abstaining. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Financina for Old Town Area Public Imorovements and the Western BYpass Corridor City Manager Bradley presented the staff report and recommended that this matter be continued until the neXt' scheduled meeting. It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Parks to continue the four (4) Public Hearings listed below to the meeting of December 12, 1995: CFD 1 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes CFD 2 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes CFD I Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 1 CFD 2 Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD NO. 2 The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone abstaining. Agenda.fa\l 12895 -1- ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Parks, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to adjourn at 8:57 PM to a meeting on December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary Agenda.fa\l 12895 -2- ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCe- CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Authority Members Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager December 12, 1995 Financings for Old Town Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: That the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority approve the respective resolutions described below. 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO COMPLEXITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO COMPLEXITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC HEARINGS BACKGROUND: On September 12, 1995, the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted a series of resolutions (the "Resolutions of Intention") relative to its intention to establish a Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and a Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) (collectively, the "Districts"). The resolutions called for a series of two public hearings for each of the Districts, one each with respect to the formation of and levy of special taxes in the 'respective District, and one each with respect to the incurrence of R:INORTONLL4GENDASIPHRESO. AGN 1 11/27/95 bonded indebtedness of the respective District (collectively, the "Public Hearings"). The Public Hearings were originally scheduled to occur on October 17, 1995. On October 10, 1995 the Authority adopted two resolutions amending the respective Resolutions of Intention for the Districts to include within the proposed boundaries of the Districts the proposed arena area, and changing the date of the Public Hearings called pursuant to the Resolutions of Intention from October 17, 1995 to November 14, 1995. On November 14, 1995 the four Public Hearings were opened and continued to November 28th and further continued to December 12th. Staff has been working diligently with the proponent of the Old Town project, T.ZoB.G., Inc. to arrive at a more definitive description of certain facilities to be financed by the Districts that ultimately will be owned and/or operated by public agencies other than the City of Temecula. Proceedings to complete the formation of the Districts cannot be advanced until agreements have been executed by such other public agencies. Due to the complexity of the proposed facilities and the need for them to accommodate development in the Districts, it is necessary for the Authority to again continue the Public Hearings for the Districts. The California Government Code permits the Public Hearings to be continued for more than thirty days, and for up to six months, upon a finding by the Authority that the complexity of the Districts requires additional time. The attached resolutions make the finding for each of the Districts and further continue the Public Hearings to January 9, 1996. FISCAL IMPACT:' None.' Attachments: Resolutions R:WORTONL tAGENDAS|PHRESO.A GN 2 11'/'27/96 RESOLUTION NO. FA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COM]~fUI~TY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO COIVIIrL,EXITY OF COMIVIUNITY FACIIATIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLn TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC HEARINGS WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution of intention to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District") and a resolution of intention to incur indebtedness for the District (collectively, the "Resolutions of Intention"); and WHEREAS, the Resolutions of Intention called for public hearings to be held on October 17th relative to the proposed District; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution amending the Resolutions of in~ention to include additional territory within the boundaries of the District, and to change the date for the public hearings called pursuant to the Resolutions of Intention from October 17, 1995 to November 14, 1995; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 1995, this Board of Directors opened the public hearings relative to the District and continued the hearings to November 28th and again continued to this date; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has been informed that the facilities to be financed by the District involve other jurisdictions, including the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and are further complicated by the need to serve a developing portion of the City of Tcmecula, and that additional design and engineering work is needed before the proceedings to form the District can continue; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the proposed facilities, it is appropriate for this Board of Directors to make a finding of complexity of the District under Section 53325 of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), and to further continue the public hearings as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old · Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and, accordingly, this Board of Directors finds that additional time is necessary to determine the scope of the facilities necessary to serve the needs of the District and to complete necessary joint community facilities district agreements with other public agencies, such that the complexity of the proposed District requires additional time to complete the hearings initially called pursuant to the Resolutions of Intention. R: INORTONL tAGENDA $|PHRESO. AGN 1/27/95 2. In light of the complexity of the proposed District, the public hearings called pursuant to the Resolutions of Intention, commenced on November 14, 1995 and continued to November 28th and again continued to this date, are hereby continued to January 9, 1996 and, at the direction of this Board of Directors, may be further continued from time to time thereafter for a period not to exceed six months, all as permitted by Section 53325 of the Act. PASSED, APPROV!~ AND ADOFrED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/ Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary R:INORTONLtAGENDAS|PHRESO. AGN 4 11/27/95 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-rRRF. Ry DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. FA 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following roll call vote: AUTHORITYMEMBERS: NOES: AUTHORrrYMEIvfBERS: AUTHOR1TYM~MBERS: ABSTAINED: AUTHOR1TYM~MBERS: June S. Greek, CMC Authority Secretary/City Clerk R: IIVOR TONL IA OENDA$|PHRESO. AGN 5 11/27/95 RESOLUTION NO. FA 95-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLT} TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACHATIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO COMPLEXITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20YESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMINTS) AND CONTINUING PUBLIC H~ARINGS WItF. REAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution of intention to:form the Old Town/West.side Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) (the "District") and a resolution of intention to incur indebtedness for the District (collectively, the "Resolutions of Intention"); and WHEREAS, the Resolutions of Intention called for public hearings to be held on October 17th relative to the proposed District; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution amending the Resolutions of intention to include additional territory within the boundaries of the District, and to change the date for the public hearings called pursuant to the Resolutions of Intention from October 17, 1995 to November 14, 1995; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 1995, this Board of Directors opened the public hearings relative to the District and continued the hearings to November 28th and again continued to this date; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has been informed that the facilities to be financed by the District involve other jurisdictions, including the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and are further complicated by the need to serve a developing portion of the City of Temecula, and that additional design and engineering work is needed before the proceedings to form the District can continue; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the proposed facilities, it is appropriate for this Board of Directors to make a finding of complexity of the District under Section 53325 of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), and to further continue the public hearings as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE rr- RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and, accordingly, this Board of Directors finds that additional time is necessary to determine the scope of the facilities necessary to serve the needs of the District and to complete necessary joint community facilities district agreements with other public agencics, such that the complexity of the proposed District requires additional time to complete the hearings initially called pursuant to the Resolutions. of Intention. R: b'tlORTONL IA GENDAStPHRESO.A GN 6 ~ ~'/27/95 2. In light of the complexity of the proposed District, the public hearings called pursuant to the Resolutions of Intention, commenced on November 14, 1995 and continued to November 281h and again continued to this date, are hereby continued to January 9, 1996 and, at the direction of this Board of Directors, may be further continued from time to time thereafter for a period not to exceed six months, all as permitted by Section 53325 of the Act. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/ Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December, 1995. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATrF. ST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary R:WOFITONLtAGENDAS|PHRESO. AGN 7 11/27/95 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. FA 95-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 12th day of December, 1995, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: AUTHORITY'MEMBERS: AU'ltIORITYMF~MBERS: AUTHOEITYMF~MBERS: AUTHORiTYMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC Authority Secretary/City Clerk R: INORTONL IAGENDAS|PHRESO.AGN 8 1 I/27/95 ITEM 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Old TownANestside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Executive Director December 12, 1995 Election of Financing Authority Officers for 1996 PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: 1. Entertain motions from the members of the Community Facilities District Financing Authority to select the President to preside until the end of calendar year 1996. Entertain motions from the Authority members to elect the Vice President who will assume the duties of the President in the President's absence and will hold this office until the end of calendar year 1996. BACKGROUND: The 'Old Town/Westside Facilities District Financing Authority selects a member to serve as President and Vice President annually. These offices are assumed at the first meeting of the Financing Authority in January and the newly elected officers preside through the calendar year of 1996. R:~,a4lende.rpt%Meyet I OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY HELD NOVEMBER 28, 1995 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 8:57 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 5 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Board Member Parks, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995. The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone abstaining. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Parks, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to adjourn · at 8:58 PM to a meeting on November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875.Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary r:\minutes.otwe\l 12895 ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:' Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Improvement Authority FROM: Executive Director DATE: December 12, 1995 SUBJECT: Election of Improvement Authority Officers for 1996 PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: 1. Entertain motions from the members of the Community Facilities District Improvement Authority to select the President to preside until the end of calendar year 1996. Entertain motions from the Authority members to elect the Vice-President who will assume the duties of the President in the President's absence and will hold this office until the end of calendar year 1996. BACKGROUND: The Old Town/Westside Facilities District Improvement Authority selects a member to serve as President and Vice President annually. These offices are assumed at the first meeting of the Improvement Authority in January and the newly elected officers preside through the calendar year of 1996. R:%aVeoda.q~jleya, I ITEM 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director~ December 12, 1995 Request to Designate Certain Private Property as "No Skateboarding, Rollerblading or Similar Activity Area." PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING PRIVATE PROPERTY AT 42690 MARGARITA ROAD AS A "NO SKATEBOARDING, ROLLERBLADING OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY AREA" PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 10.36 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE. BACKGROUND: The City has received a request to declare certain private property as "No Skateboarding, Rollerblading or Similar Activity Area" as permitted by City Ordinance No. 94-18. This Ordinance was recently adopted to prohibit skateboarding in certain areas of the City designated by the City Council. The Temecula United Methodist Church has made this request to have their private property designated as a no skateboarding area. The new concrete parking lot built in conjunction with the church has attracted numerous skateboarders to the area creating conflict with the construction crews and posing a liability for the church. Ordinance 94-18 requires that the property owner submit a written application requesting the "no skateboarding" designation. After the proper application is received and proper notice is given, the City Council may, by resolution, designate the area in question as a "no skateboarding area" and request that the area be posted as such. After the appropriate signs have been posted designating the site as a "no skateboarding area", the police may cite the violators. A site plan has been submitted by the applicant which illustrates the area to be designated as "no skateboarding". R:~STAFFRPT~KATB.CC3 11/22/95 slb 1 FISCAL IMPACT: Potential positive fiscal impact to property owners due to decrease in property damage. Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 95- - Page 3 2. Application from Temecula United Methodist Church - Page 6 R:~FAFFRFI'XSKATE.CC3 11/22/95 db 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 95- R:\STAFFRPT~SKATE.CC'~ 11/22/95 db ~ ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING PRIVATE PROPERTY AT 42690 MARGARITA ROAD AS A "NO SKATEBOARDING, ROLLERBLADING OR SIMHJAR ACTIVITY AREA" PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 10.36 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 94-18 established Chapter 10.36 of the Tcmecula Municipal Code and adopted by ordinance permits the City Council to prohibit skateboarding, rollerblading or similar activity in certain designated areas; and, WHEREAS, the efforts of the property owners at 42690 Margarita Road to control skateboarding, rollerblading and similar activities have been unsuccessful to date; and, WHEREAS, private. property at 42690 Margarita Road has the potential to receive damage in connection with skateboarding, rollerblaring and similar activities; and, WHEREAS, the property owner of 42690 Margarita Road has requested the City to designate the property as a "No Skateboarding, Rollerblaring or Similar Activity Area"; and, WHEREAS, the property owner has submitted a written application and required exhibits in conformance with Chapter 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on December 12, 1995, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either support or in opposition; and, WHEREAS, notice of proposed action was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. findings: Fmdings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following A. The City Council in approving this Resolution makes the following findings to wit: 1. Ordinance 94-18 was enacted by the City Council to maintain the safety of the general public, as well as the right to enjoyment of private property within the City. 2. Curren~y the unrestricted use of private property for skateboarding, rollerblaring involves safety risks. R:~STAFFRPT~KATE.CC3 11/22/95 slb 4 Code. The action proposed is consistent with Chapter 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal 4. The action proposed complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the establishment of a "No Skateboarding, Rollerblading, or Similar Activity Area" on the property located at 42690 Margarita Road in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Enforcement of the "no skateboarding, rollerblading, or similar activity" shall not commence until appropriate signage has been posted as required by Chapter 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Section 3. The City Clerk shall Certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this day of , 199 . ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF 'TEMECULA) 'I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of , 199__ by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CITY COUNCiLMEMBERS: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: R:\STAFFRFI~KATE.CC3 11/22/95 ~lb June S. Greek, City Clerk ATTACHMENT NO. 2 APPLICATION FROM TEMECULA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH R:\STAFFRPT~SKATE.CC3 11/22/95 slb 6 TEMECULA UNITED METHODIST. CHURCH 42690 MARGAR1TA ROAD P. O. BOX 892350 TEMECULA, CA 92589 October 24, 1995 Ms. Debbie S. Ubnoske Planning Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Ms. Ubnoske, The purpose of this letter is to request a designation of a "No Skateboarding, RoHerblading or Similar Activity Area" for our church parking lot located at the above address. We have just recently completed construction of our facility and have already had individuals using the parking lot for recreation as described above. Our insurance company is also requesting that this action be taken.* AWjol Annette Roberts President, Board of Trustees TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official December 12, 1995 Adoption of the 1994 Editions of Various Model Building Codes RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Open the Public Hearing, receive comments from the public, if any, and continue the public hearing to December 9, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of hearing testimony for or against the adoption of Ordinance No. 95-__ and on findings to be adopted in connection therewith. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: · ORDINANCE NO. 95--- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE *CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 15.02TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR FEES AND ENFORCEMENT OF BUILDING REGULATIONS; AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04AND 15.08 OF THIS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM SWIMMING POOLS. SPAS AND HOT TUB CODE; AND .THE 1993 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. DISCUSSION: The State of California Building Standards Commission has adopted the 1994 editions of the Uniform Codes as published by the International Conference of Building Officials and the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, along with state agency · Agenda~1894Code. Rpt Agenda Report November 28, 1995 Page 2 amendments that appear in this Ordinance, are those that are generally administrative in nature. This ordinance does, however, contain several amendments that staff feels are necessary for maintaining the public safety in buildings within the City. Draft copies of this ordinance have been distributed to the Building Industry Association and the Economic Development Corporation, Expediting Committee, for review and comment. Agenda~1994Code. Rpt ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 15.02 TO THE TEMECULAMUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR FEES AND ENFORCEMENT OF BUILDING REGULATIONS; AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04 AND 15.08 OFTHIS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OFTHE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; THE 1994 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE; AND THE 1993 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows: SECTION I: CHAPTER 15.02, "Fees and Enforcement," is added to Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: 15.0a.010 Permit Fees. Fees for permits and services rendered pursuant to these Building and Construction Regulations shall be paid to the BUilding Official as set forth in schedules established by Resolution of the City Council. The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of these codes shall be made by the Building Official. The value to be used in computing the fees shall be the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work, painting,' roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. 15.02,020 Plan Review Fees. When submittal documents are required by Section 302.2 of the Uniform Administrative Code as adopted in Section 15.04,060 of this Municipal Code, a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting the submittal documents for plan review. Said plan review shall be 75 percent of the building permit fee as established by Resolution of the City Council pursuant to Section 15.02.010 herein. The plan review fees specified in this Section are separate fees from the permit fees specified in Section 15.020,010 herein and are in addition to the permit fees. !:5341.1 i When submittal documents are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan review or when the project involves deferred submittal items as defined in Section 302.4.2 of the Uniform Administrative Code, an additional plan review fee shall be charged at the rate established by Resolution of the City Council. 15.02.030 ~xpiration of Plan Review. Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Official. The Building Official may extend the time for action by application of the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days on written request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. An application shall not be extended more than once. An application shall not be extended if this code or any other pertinent laws or ordinances.have been amended subsequent to the date of application. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee. 15.02.040 Civil Penalty. Any person, firm or corporation who shall proceed with or commence work for which a permit is required by these Building and Construction Regulations without first having obtained such permit shall, if subsequently permitted to obtain. a permit therefor, pay double the fee fixed for such work. The original permit fee shall be for issuance of the permit and the balance shall be-.a civil penalty. This provision shall not apply to emergency work when it shall be proved to the satisfaction of the Building Official that such work was urgently necessary and that it was not practical to obtain a permit before commencement of the work. In all such cases a permit must be secured as soon as it is practicable to do so, and if there is an unreasonable delay in securing the required permit, the civil penalty as provided herein shall be charged. In no event shall such civil penalty exceed the permit fee plus $500.00. The Civil penalty provided in this Section shall be in addition to any other fines and remedies prescribed elsewhere in this Municipal Code. The payment of such fee and fine shall not relieve any persons from fully complying with the requirements of these Building and Construction Regulations in the execution of the work. 15.02.050 Fee Refunds. The Building Official may authorize refunding of a fee paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or collected. The Building Official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under the permit issued in accordance with this Code. The Building Official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or ORANGE: 5341.1 2 canceled before any examination time has been expended. The Building Official shall not authorize the refunding of any fee paid except upon written application filed by the original permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. 15.02,060 Violations. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building or structure or cause or permit the same to be'done in violation of Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of this Municipal Code. Violations and violation penalties are subject to Chapter 1.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code. SECTION II= The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby amend Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Temecula Municipal Code to adopt by reference certain uniform codes with amendments as follows: 15.04,010 Codes Adopted. The following are hereby adopted by reference as amended by Section III of this Ordinance, as the Building Codes of the City of Temecula, one (1) copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk: Uniform Building Code, volumes 1, 2 and 3 of the 1994 edition with appendices and California State amendments; Uniform Mechanical Code, 1994 edition with appendices and California State amendments; Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 edition with appendices and California State amendments; D. Uniform Administrative Code, 1994 edition; Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1994; F. Uniform Housing Code, 1994 edition; Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code, 1994 edition; H. National Electrical Code, 1993 edition. -.SECTION III= The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby amend Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Temecula Municipal Code to provide for amendments to certain Uniform Codes adopted by reference under Section II of this Ordinance as follows: :5341.1 3 15.04.020 In general. The following amendments are made to the Building Codes, 1994 editions, as adopted by this Chapter: 15.04.030 Oniform Building Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Building Code, 1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter: Section 103 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 106.2 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 106.2 Work Exempt from Permits. A building permit shall not be required for the following: Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height, and garden walls not over 4" measured from the top of footing to top of wall unless supporting a surcharge or impounding flammable Class I, Class II or III-A liquids. Section 106.3.1 is hereby. amended by adding thereto Subsection (8) to read as follows: All contractors and their subcontractors must have current and valid city business licenses. Section 107 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thru 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Building Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 her.in. Table No. 1-A Building Permit Fees is hereby deleted in its entirety· Section 502 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following: ORANGE :53~,1.1 Numbers for commercial and industrial buildings 4 must be a minimum of twelve (12) inches in height facing the street or front of the building. All suites must have a minimum of (4) inch high letters on both front and rear doors. Residential usages must have as a minimum four (4) inch high letters. All letters must be placed upon a contrasting background. G. Section 904 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 904.2.1 Where required. An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in this Section except where the 1994 U.F.C. applies. In that case, the most restrictive provisions will apply. H. Section 1503 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1503. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code shall be as specified in Table No. 15-A and as classified in Section 1504, except that no roof covering shall be less than a Class B roofing assembly. ~xception: 1. The roof'covering on any structure regulated by this Code within the Historical District Overlay, generally known as the Old Town Temecula Historical Preservation District, shall not be less than a Class C roofing assembly. 2. The roof covering of any structure located on a parcel with a minimum of one- half acre in area may have a roof covering of not less than a Class C Roofing Assembly when approved by the Building Official. 3. The roof covering of all re-roofing shall conform to the applicable provisions of this Section as amended herein, except that the roof covering for the re-roofing of ten percent (10%) or less of the area of any roof may consist of material comparable to the remainder of the roof. Section 1924 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1924. The minimum thickness of concrete floor slabs supported directly on the ground shall not be less than three and one-half (3 1/2) inches. All group R occupancies shall have a .-':5341.1 5 minimum six (6) mil moisture barrier with minimum two (2) inch sand cover. Exception: 1. A moisture barrier shall not be required under slabs on grade of open or enclosed patios as defined in Section 217. Section 1924 is hereby further amended by adding thereto a new paragraph to read as follows: Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels. In all occupancies, slab connection from existing slabs to new construction shall be placed at twenty-four (24) inches on center with reinforcing steel on one half inch minimum diameter, eighteen (18) inches in length. Appendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 paragraph i is hereby amended to read as follows: The top of the barrier shall be at least 60 inches above grade measured on the side of the barrier which faces away from the swimming pool. Appendix Chapter 16'. Division I is hereby deleted in its entirety. Appendix Chapter 19 is hereby deleted in its entirety· Appendix Chapter 21 is hereby deleted in its entirety· ADDendiX Chapter 23 is hereby deleted in its entirety. 15.04.040 Uniform Mechanical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Mechanical Code, 1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter. ORANGE:53/,1.1 Section 111 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations~and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 115 is hereby deleted in.its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thru 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated her,in by reference. All references in the Uniform 6 Mechanical Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 504 is hereby amended by adding the following: Section 504.1. Makeup and exhaust ducts. Bathroom and laundry room exhaust ducts may be of gypsum wallboard subject to the limitation of Section 1002(a). Aluminum flex ducts are not permitted to be installed horizontally in rooms that produce steam. An angle greater than forty- five (45) degrees from the vertical is considered a horizontal run. 15.04.050 Uniform Plumbing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter: Section 102.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 103.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thru 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated her.in by reference. All references in the Uniform Plumbing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 202{I) is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Indirect Waste Pipe. An indirect waste pipe is a pipe that does not connect directly with the drainage system but conveys liquid wastes by discharging through an approved air gap into a plumbing fixture, interceptor or receptacle which is directly connected to the drainage system. Section 411 is hereby amended by adding the following: .'-:5341.1 7 Section 411.1 Floor drains shall be installed in all compartments containing urinals or where hose bibs are provided for washing down floors. Section 719.5 is hereby amended to read as follows: Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt paving shall be made accessible by yard boxes, or extended flush with paving with a "brass cap" or other approved material for installation where subject to vehicular traffic. Section'1204.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following: Testing of gas piping over two (2) inches in diameter shall require a twenty-four (24) hour graph test witnessed by the jurisdiction. Section 1211.3 is hereby amended by adding the following exceptions: Exception: 1. The installation of natural gas line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the slab as approved by the Building Official. Exception: 2. 'The installation of propane gas line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the slab as approved by the Building Official. The following chapters from the appendices are hereby deleted from the Uniform Plumbina Code, 1994 edition, adopted by this ordinance. Appendix E - mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks, is hereby deleted in 'its entirety. Appendix H - commercial kitchen grease interceptors, is hereby deleted in its entirety. ADDendiX ChaPter 3 is hereby amended by adding a new Section thereto as follows: Section 318 Rodent proofing. 318.1 Rodent proofing. Plumbing systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with Sections 318.2 through 318.4 so as to prevent rodents from entering structures. 5341.1 8 318.2 Strainer plates. All strainer plates on drain inlets shall be designed and installed so that all openings are not greater than'l/2 inch in least dimension. 318.3 Meter boxes. Meter boxes shall be constructed in such a manner that rodents are prevented from entering a structure by way of the water service pipes connecting the meter box and the structure. 318.4 Openings for pipes. In or on structures where openings have been made in walls, floors or ceilings for the passage of pipes, such openings shall be closed and protected by the installation of approved metal collars that are securely fastened to the adjoining structure. 15.04.060 Uniform Administrative Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Administrative Code,.1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter. Section 205 is. hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Sections 304.1 and 304.2 are hereby deleted in their entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.010 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated her. in byreference. All references in the Uniform Administrative Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. Section 304.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.020 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated her. in by reference. Section 304.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section 15.02.040 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. 15.04.070 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. The following amendments, additions and deletions are 5341.1 9 made to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter| Section 203 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. 15.04.080 Uniform Housing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Housing Code, 1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter: Section 204 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 302 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thru 15.02.050 of this Municipa~ Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Housing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein.. 15.04.090 Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code. following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Swimming Pool. SDa and Hot Tub Code, 1994 edition, adopted by this Chapter: Section 1.7 is hereby amended by adding the following: The Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 1.11 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 thru 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. ORANGE:53~1.1 10 Chapter 15.08 National Electrical Code is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by the following: 15.04,100 National Electrical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the National Electrical Code, 1993 edition, adopted .by this Chapter: Section 90-4 is hereby amended by adding the following: Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code. Section 110-5 is hereby amended by adding the following: Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no aluminum conductors smaller than #6 A.W.G. shall be used. Section 210-1 is hereby amended by adding the following: Accessory uses or other building, signs, etc., separately located on the same lot or premises, shall have connecting conductors run underground. (Agricultural area excepted.) Where spare circuit protective devices are provided or space for future circuit protective devices are provided on the bus in any flush or semi-flush mounted panel, then raceways of sufficient capacity to permit utilization of such space or spaces shall be provided to an approved accessible location. Such accessible location is normally described as follows: Where sufficient attic space is available or under floor space is available, a raceway shall terminate conveniently for future use in each such space. Where this condition does not exist or other factors govern, then such terminations shall be approved by the Building Official. Section 336-3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 336-3 Uses Permitted. Non-metallic sheathed cable shall not be used for exposed wiring, except as provided in Section 336-10(b), and shall only be used in one and two family dwellings or multi-family dwellings (apartment E:5341.1 11 houses) not exceeding three (3) floors above grade. SECTION IV= Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7, amendments to building standards as set forth herein shall be accompanied by findings as adopted by Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula. SECTION V= If any Section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application .to other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each Section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portions of the application thereof to any person or place be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION VI= The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION VII= This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days following the date of adoption hereof. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day-of Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk ORANGE: 534. 1,1 12 ITEM 17 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official December 12, 1995 Adoption of the 1994 Edition of The Uniform Fire Code RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Open the Public Hearing, receive comments from the public, if any, and continue the public hearing to December 9, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of hearing testimony for or against the adoption of Ordinance No. 95-._ and on the findings to be adopted in connection therewith. 2. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1994 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS, 1994 EDITION. DISCUSSION: The State of California Building Standards Commission has adopted the 1994 edition of the Uniform Fire Codes as published by. the International Fire Code Institute along with certain amendments made by state agencies specifically the State Fire Marshall's Office. This action makes it necessary for each local jurisdiction to adopt these codes and any local amendments · necessary to assist them in the protection .of the public safety in buildings in their jurisdiction. The recommended amendments that appear in Ordinance No. 95-_ are those that are generally administrative in nature. This ordinance does, however, contain several amendments that staff feels are necessary for maintaining the public safety in buildings within the City· Draft copies of this ordinance have been distributed to the Building Industry Association and the Economic Development Corporation and Expediting Committee for review and comment. ,- Agenda%1994Fire. Rpt ORDINANCE NO. 95- ... AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE -UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1994 EDITION, AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS, 1994 EDITION The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows: SECTION I: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby amend Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Temecula Municipal Code to adopt by reference certain uniform codes with amendments as follows: 15.16.010. Codes Adopted. The following are hereby adopted by reference, as amended by Article II of this Ordinance, as the Fire Code of the City of Temecula, one (1) copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Uniform Fire Code, 1994 edition, with appendices and California State amendments. B. Uniform Fire Code Standards, 1994 editions. SECTION II: The City Council of the City. of Temecula does hereby amend Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Temecula Municipal Code to provide for amendments to certain Uniform Codes adopted by reference under Section I of this Ordinance as follows: 15.16.020. Amendments. The following amendments, additions, and deletions are made to the Uniform Fire Code, 1994 edition, as adopted by this Ordinance. Ae ORANGE :5346.1 Section 204 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Corporate Counsel shall mean the City Attorney of the City of Temecula. B. Section 207 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Fire Chief, Fire Safety Specialist, Fire Systems Inspector, Fire Prevention Officer is the officer, regardless of rank, who has been appointed by the Fire Chief to be in charge of the Fire Prevention Bureau, and includes the duly authorized representative of the Fire Chief for the purpose of enforcing this Code. 1 Section 214 is hereby amended by adding thereto: Municipality is the City of Temecula. Section 901.4.4 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Premises Identification Approved numbers and addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be contrast with their background. Commercial establishments shall have 12" numbers with suite numbers being 6" in size. Single and multi-family residents shall have 4" letters, or as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Section 902.2.2.1 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Dimensions Fire apparatus roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet and 6 inches. (Exception not modified)- Section 902.2.2.2 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Surface Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of the apparatus and shall be with a surface so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 70,000 lbs. GVWwith a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. Section 902.2.2.3 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Turnin~ Radius The turning radius of a fire apparatus road shall be a minimum of a 45 degree radius. Section 902.2.2.3 of'the Uniform Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Dead Ends Le Dead end fire apparatus roads in excess of 150 feet (45,720mm) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. Section 902.2.2.6 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Grade The gradient for a fire apparatus access shall not exceed 15%. Subsection (a) of Section 902.2.4.1.'of the Uniform Fire Code is added as follows: Penalty The required width of Fire Department access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs or red painted curbs or other appropriate notice prohibiting obstruction shall be required and maintained. Any obstruction or impedance to said fire lane may be cited, as an infraction, or removed at the owners expense, forthwith, by any public agency. Section 901.4.3 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Fire Protection Equipment and Fire Hydrants Fire protection equipment and fire hydrants shall be clearly identified in a manner approved by the Chief to prevent obstruction by parking and other obstructions. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots). Installation of blue dots shall be in accordance with Temecula fire services guidelines. Section 902.4 is hereby amended to read: Site Access Where gates are proposed to be installed that are electronically activated for access to a commercial or residential site, an approved electronic key switch shall be installed for emergency vehicle access. Section 1003.2 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to read as follows: ORANGE: 5346.1 3 Required Installations 1. All Occupancies Unless State Codes, Uniform Fire Code or Uniform Building Code is more restrictive, every structure hereafter constructed, except a residential structure of two dwelling units or less, which exceeds the square footage listed in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. Existing-Occupancies Unless State Codes, Uniform Fire Code or Uniform Building Code is more restrictive, every existing structure to which additions are made, where either addition itself exceeds the square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1 requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute. 3. Change of Occupancy Every existing structure to which a change of occupancy occurs shall install sprinklers when required by the Uniform Building Code or Uniform Fire Code. Section 1003.3.1 of the Uniform Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Where Required All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flow switches on a sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored. Valve monitoring and water-flow and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remove station or proprietary monitoring station as defined by U.F.C. Standard 10-2 or, when approved by the Chief, shall sound an audible signal at a constantly attend location. (Exception not modified). Appendix Chapter II-A, Section 24, is amended to read as follows: Cost Recovery Section 24.1. Any person who negligently, or in 346.1 4 ORANGE:53~6.1 violation of law, sets a fire, allows a fire to be set, or allows a fire kindled or artended by him to escape his control or burn any structure, improvement, forest, range or grassland, is liable for the expense of fighting the fire, and such expense shall be a charge against that person, and that charge shall constitute a debt of such person which is collectible by the person, or by the federal, state, county, public, or private agency or the County Fire Department incurring such expenses in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.1.1. Any person who negligently, or in violation of any statute regulation or ordinance dumps, or causes to be dumped, or releases or causes to be released, any hazardous or extremely hazardous material or hazardous waste onto the ground or int the environment is liable for the expense of mitigating and/or removing the hazard created by said actions or omissions, and such expense shall be a charge against such person or persons. Said charges shall constitute a debt of such person or persons which shall be collectible by the person, or by the federal, state, county, public or private agency or by the County Fire Department and/or the County Health Department incurring the expense of mitigation and/or removal in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under arising contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.2. The expense'of securing any emergency which is a result of a violation of this ordinance is a charge against the person whose violation of this ordinance caused the emergency. Damages caused by and expenses incurred by the Fire Department for securing such emergency shall constitute a debt of such manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, expressed or implied. Section 24.2.1. The expense of securing any hazardous or extremely hazardous materials or waste incident which is a result of negligence or a violation of any statute, regulation or ordinance is a charge against the person or persons whose actions or omissions caused the incident. The expenses incurred by the Fire Department and/or Health Department for securing such incident shall constitute a debt of such person or persons and shall be collectible by-the County Fire Chief or Health Officer in the same manner as in the case of an obligation'arising under contract, expressed or implied. 24.3. Structure improvement shall mean, for the 5 purposes of this Division only, any building, garage, tent, out-building, barn, corral, fence, or bridge whether or not in actual use at the time of the fire. 24.2. Requests for copies of public and legal documents, photographs, etc., relating to department activities are available as authorized by law through the Fire Department's Custodian of Records. All document requests shall be in writing, accompanied by a check made payable to the Riverside County fire Department, in the amount(s) set forth in Ordinance 671.. SECTION III: Unless otherwise specified in this Ordinance or the Uniform Fire Code, all violations of this Ordinance are subject to Chapter 1.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code. SECTION IV: Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7, amendments to building standards as set forth herein shall be accompanied by findings as adopted by Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula. SECTION V: If any Section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions 6f this Ordinance or its application to other persons or'places. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each Section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portions of the application thereof to any person or place be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION VI: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION VII: This Ordinance shall be effective thrity (30) days following the date of adoption hereof. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor 0 5346.1 6 June S. Greek, City Clerk ORANGE: 53~,6.1 7 ITEM 18 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council City Manager December 12, 1995 Election of Council Officers for 1996 PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: 1. Entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to select the Mayor to preside until the end of calendar year 1996. Entertain motions from the City Councilmember to elect the Mayor-Pro Tem who will assume the duties of the Mayor in the Mayor's absence end will hold this office until the end of calendar year 1996. BACKGROUND: The City Council selects a member to serve as Mayor and Mayor Pro-Tem annually. These offices are assumed at the first meeting of the City Council in January and the newly elected Mayor and Mayor Pro-Tem preside through the calendar year of 1996. R:~Oe~de.rptUdeyor I