Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
052494 CC Agenda
AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD MAY 24, 1994- 7:00 PM curl " EXE VE'S N ::. :30:.' ~:.. :e i:. ou a toi:: .... §~95 6:. ER cE ~H ~!iOR ~TO :' Government Code.. 7~ CONF EN ~ ..:NEGOTi R~':;Agency '..' negotiator: Harwo~diEtlvals~n'ah~!iieran~'Yates: :ErnpiOyee.0~anizati0n:':Tearnsters'. · Local· 91 i, representing..e~ral. and ::.profeaional%confibtiel.' emplbYe :.gm.ps;... ' · · Government Cotle"Si.~57 ~"~'. i~i::Effibli~"E~Yeei A~01nt~ie.nt~.::'!citY'Manager ';" ::" 'RecrUitment~'an'd ;section. 54956':.9(b) C0nferenc~.:!With :Legal :::.Counsi - Anticipated utiuauon ~n tWo..,~tter~i: ::; ...i:.;.:.~: .'.. :. i..i.:.i::~::i ;:!:.:i"!:.:.::." :.:i.~:..:.: '...':.~:.:'::.: ::.~: At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ron Roberts presiding Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 94-15 Resolution: No. 94-50 Invocation: Father Ed Renner, St. Thomas Episcopal Flag Salute: Mayor Pro Tem Stone ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENTS Presentation of GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award Proclamation Honoring Police Volunteers Proclamation - American Heritage Week A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item ngt listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. R:%Agenda%.032294 I When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. I Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 3 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of April 26, 1994; 2.2 Approve the minutes of May 2, 1994. Resolution ADorovinQ List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:U~4ende%032294 2 4 5 6 8 Final Vestino Tract MaD No. ~4135 (Located east of Margarita Road and south of Santiago Road) 4.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135 subject to the Conditions of Approval. Final Vestino Tract MaD No. 24135-2 (Located east of Margarita Road and north of De Portola Road) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-2 subject to the Conditions of Approval. Final Vesting Tract MaD No. 24131-2 (Located west of Meadows Parkway end south of Pauba Road) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-2subject to the Conditions of Approval. Acceotance Into the City-Maintained Storm Drain System - Storm Drain Facilities Within a Portion of Lot 273 of Tract Mao 3883 (APN 919-200-010)Abuttinq Calle Fiesta RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM - STORM DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN A PORTION OF LOT 273 OF TRACT MAP 3883 (APN 919-200-010) ABUTTING CALLE FIESTA Final Parcel MaD No. 27239 (Located on the westerly side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Rancho Way) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 27239 subject to the Conditions of Approval. R:%Agende%0322kl 3 9 10 11 Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Modification of the Traffic Sional & StriDing at the Intersection of Rancho California Road and Front Street (Project No. PW94-09) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for providing and installing detector loops and re-striping on the northerly approach of Front Street at Rancho California Road. Acceptance of Maintenance Easements on Ynez Road adjacent to Tower Plaza and Town Center for Traffic Signal Maintenance Within CFD 88-12 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement and Grant of Easements with the property owners along Ynez Road accepting easements for Traffic Signal Maintenance. 10.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE ON YNEZ ROAD ADJACENT TO TOWER PLAZA AND TOWN CENTER Rancho California Road InterchanQe Improvements. Caltrans Cooperative Design AQreement RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-794, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR DESIGN OF THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS R:V~4~nde~0322~4 4 12 Overland Drive Overcrossina Improvements, Caltrans Cooperative Design Aareement RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-793, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR DESIGN OF THE OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENTS SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 13 Ordinance No. 94-14 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, PUBLIC USE PERMITS AND PLOT PLANS PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public heariqg. 14 Abatement of Hazardous Veaetation from Vacant Lots or Parcels Der Ordinance 91-18, Chapter 6.16 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS WEEDS R:~e~eenda%O3229a, 6 COUNCIL BUSINESS 15 Temecul8 Town Association Assistance RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Consider and provide direction to staff concerning interim assistance to the Temecula Town Association. 16 Review and Adootion of the ProPosed Fiscal Year 1994-95 Ooeratino Budoat RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Review the proposed annual Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year 1994-95; 16.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 OPERATING BUDGET 16.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Community Services Commission Appointment RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint one applicant to fill an unexpired term on the TemeC~ula Community Services Commission caused by the resignation of Commissioner Evelyn Harker. CFD 88-12 (Ynaz Corridor) - Construction of Storm Drain on the South Side of Solana Way from Ynez Road to Westerly of Maroarita Road RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Consider directing staff to prepare and authorize the Mayor to execute an Amendment to the Joint Financing Agreement for CFD 88-12, providing for CFD financing and construction of a 78" Storm Drain on the South side of Solana Way from Ynez Road to Westerly of Margarita Road. 17 18 R:%Agende'~03~294 e 19 Consideration of Ordinance Re~ulatinQ Tax Cab Service RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 12.08 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXI CABS 19.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 12.08 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXI CABS 19.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION N0.94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXI CABS DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: June 14, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:'ua~enda%O32294 7 TEM;CUI A COMMUNITY Rt:RV~n=R nlSTRICT MI:F'rlNQ - FFo be held st 8:00) CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Muf~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 26, 1994. 2 Acceotance of Easement Deeds and Street Liahting RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Accept the easement deeds for the TCSD to provide landscape maintenance services. 2.2 Accept Tract 21760 into the existing Rancho Highlands landscape maintenance rate level; 2.3 Accept arterial and residential street lights. DISTRICT BUSINESS 3 Fiscal Year 1994-95 Annual ODeretina Budeet RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS AND PERSONNEL POSITIONS R:V~eende%032294 ~EPARTMENTAL REPORT GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting June 14, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:%Aeerde~32294 9 TEMFCULA RFDI=VEI OPMENT AnFNCY MEFTINn CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENT: AGENCY BUSINESS I Minutes Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mur~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 26, 1994. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: Temecula, California. June 14, 1994, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, R:~gende%032214 10 PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 180 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60601 312/977-9700 · Fax: 312/977-4806 April 14, 1994 Mr. David F. Dixon City Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Dear Mr. Dixon: I am pleased to notify you that the City of Temecula has received the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). This award is the highest form of recognition in governmental budgeting and represents a significant achievement by your organization. Your Government's plaque will be shipped under separate cover to Ms. Mary Jane McLamey, who originally submitted the budget for consideration. We hope you will arrange for a formal public presentation of the award, and that appropriate publicity will be given to this notable achievement. A press release is enclosed for your use. We appreciate your participation in GFOA's budget awards program. Through your example, we hope that other governments will be encouraged to achieve excellence in budgeting. Sincerely, Jeffrey L. Esser Executive Director J~ Enclosure WASHINGTON OFFICE 1750 K Street, N.W.. Suite 650. Washington, DC 20006 202/429-2750 · Fax: 202/429-2755 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 180 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60601 312/977-9700 · Fax: 312/977-4806 April 14, 1994 PRESS RELEASE For Further Information Contact RELEASE IMMEDIATELY Dennis Strachota (312) 977-9700 CHICAGO--The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) is pleased to announce that the City of Temecula, California has received GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for its budget. The award represents a sigmi~cant achievement by the jurisdiction. It reflects the commitment of the governing body and staff to meeting the highest principles of governmental budgeting. In order to receive the budget award, the jurisdiction had to satisfy nationally recognized guidelines for effective budget presentation. These guidelines are designed to assess how well a government's budget serves as: · a policy document · a financial plan · an operations guide · a communications device Budget documents must be rated "proficient" in all four categories to receive the award. Since the inception of GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards Program in 1984, approximately 650 jurisdictions have received the Award. Award recipients have pioneered efforts to improve the quality of budgeting and provide an excellent example for other governments throughout North America. The Government Finance Officers Association is a nonprofit professional association serving 12,650 government finance professionals throughout North America. GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards Program is the only national awards program in governmental budgeting. WASHINGTON OFFICE 1750 K Street. N.W., Suite 650, Washington, DC 20006 202/429-2750 · Fax: 202/429-2755 The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WtXERR~,S, the City of Temecula is served by a highly skilled and dedicated team of law enforcement professionals, and WItRiiEAS, these sworn officers are supported and augmented by an equally dedicated and well-trained group of Reserve Officers; and W!tEREAS, these individuals are citizens who give unselfishly of their time and talents to serve as Resw,,e Officers without compensation; and WHEREAS, the City's Police Department is also served by a number of loyal citizen volunteers who give generously of their time as well, doing paperwork, service within the station and other necessary projects; and WITEREAS, all of these faithful volunteers serve without payment other than the satisfaction of performing a commendable job for their community; and WHEREAS, without the contributions of all of these committed men and women, the cost of law enforcement might well be higher, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ron Roberrs, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of May 22 - 28, 1994 to be "TEMECULA POLICE VOLUNTEERS WEEK" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 24th day 'of May, 1994. Ron Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WFIERI~-AS, the Temecula Valley High School has established an Ethnic Advisory Forum composed of students, parents, counselors, teachers and administrators who have committed themselves to developing and fostering positive relationships among various student groups on campus, and WHEREAS, the Ethnic Advisory Forum and a parent-teacher advisory group plan to celebrate the diversity that makes our community so unique; and VaTERFAS, they plan a week-long series of events designed to explore the contributions of various cultural groups; and WHEREAS, the theme will be "Threads of Diversity, Fabric of Unity., highlighting the contributions of all Americans to our country's visual and performing arts, literature and culinary arts; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald H. Roberts, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of May 23-27, 1994 to be "AMERICAN HERITAGE WEEK" IN WITNF. SS WltF, RF_X)F, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 241h day of May, 1994. Ron Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD APRIL 26, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:39 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufloz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:39 PM. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code §54957,discussion of Public Employee-Independent Contractor - Public Employment/Evaluation of position of City Attorney and §54956.95- Claimant Dennis Wise & Roseann Perazzo - Agency Claimed against - City of Temecula. The motion was unanimously carried. The meeting was reconvened in regular session at 7:04 PM. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Ken Coil, Neighborhood Church of the Nazarene. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Birdsall. City Manager Ron Bradley stated the City Council met in closed session to discuss its legal services contract and no decision was made. He reported in the matter of Dennis Wise & Roseann Perazzo v. the City of Temecula, the City will recover its legal fees. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Councilmember Mu~oz presented a Certificate of Achievement to Bob Grim, for taking the initiative to create and complete the landscaping and beautification of Bob's Unocal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Front Street. Mayor Roberts proclaimed the month of May to be "Water Awareness Month." Minutes%4~,26~94 -1 - O5112/94 City Council Minute April 26, 1994 PUBLIC COMMENTS Michelle Harris and Melody Brunsting, 27540 Ynez, Ste J-9, on behalf of the Balloon and Wine Festival, thanked the City Council for their support end presented them with the first programs as well as other gifts for their sponsorship. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked that the matter of prisoners being released from the Southwest Station without transportation be addressed. Chief of Police Rick Sayre reported that funds have become available to institute a program to have prisoners, released without transportation, given a taxi-cab voucher. He stated this program will be implemented Wednesday of this week. Councilmember Muftoz reported that the RTA Bus Line No. 23, with an average ridership of 4,200 passengers, jumped to 5,200 last month. Mayor Roberts reported that a local newspaper reported a proposed ban of skateboarding on all public streets and explained this is in error and no such ban has ever been proposed. He also commented on a letter to the editor by George Buhler discussing using a common area of Meadowview as an alternate route between Del Rey and La Serena, and reported this is also an error and no use of common area in Meadowview has been proposed. Mayor Roberts asked that in the future, agenda items that have been continued from previous meetings be placed ahead of other items of Council Business. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated he would abstain on Consent Calendar Items 7 and 8 and requested the removal of Item No. 18. Councilmember Birdsall recorded a "no" vote on Item No. 15. Councilmember Parks stated he would abstain on item No. 8, and requested the removal of Items No. 7, 8 and 14 for discussion. Councilmember Birdsall requested the removal of Item No. 12 from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Parks stated he would abstain from Item No. 8 and Councilmember Mur~oz stated he would abstain on Item No. 23. Councilmember Mur~oz asked if the new Stenciling Truck had the capability to do striping. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney answered that it is unable to perform certain needed striping functions and for that reason an allocation of $10,000 is needed for cover costs for this service. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-6, 9-11, 13, 15-17, 19-23. Councilmember Birdsall voted "no" on Item No. 15. Minutes~4~26~94 -2- O5112/94 City Council Minutes April 26. 1994 The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts None None e Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 22, 1994; 1.2 Approve the minutes of March 29, 1994; 1.3 Approve the minutes of April 7, 1994; 1.4 Approve the minutes of April 11, 1994; 1.5 Approve the minutes of April 12, 1994· Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy 4.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds. Out-of-State Travel Plans 5.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans· Minutes~4~26~94 -3- 05/12/94 City Council Minutes April 26, 1994 Strioina/Stencilina Contract Amendment 6.1 Approve an increase in the contract with Orange County Striping in the amount of $10,000. 10. 11. 13. Aoorooriation of Funds for Pechanap Settlement 9.1 Approve appropriation of funds in the amount of $17,500 from the Temecula Redevelopment Agency fund balance for Account 280-199-802-5700. Financial Advisory Services for Issuance of industrial Develooment Bonds 10.1 Approve the financial advisory services of Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates relating to the proposed relocation/expansion of Tension Envelope to Temecula and authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute a contract. California Parks and Wildlife Bond Act (CALPAW '94) 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING THE CALIFORNIA PARKS AND WILDLIFE BOND ACT OF 1994 (CALPAW '94) "No Parkina" Zone - North Side of Rancho California Road between Lvndie Lane and Moraaa Road 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A "NO PARKING" ZONE ON MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA ROAD FROM 6:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. WEEKDAYS Minutes~4~26~94 -4- 05/12/94 City Council Minutes April 26, 1994 15. 16. 17. 19. Professional Services with Robert Bein William Frost and Associates for the Desion of Walcott Corridor 15.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Robert Bein William Frost and Associates (RBF) to provide Engineering Services for the design of Walcott Corridor, which will include Nicolas Road, Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos and Walcott Lane for an amount not to exceed $118,800 which will be funded through Measure A. AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Professional Services with Norris-ReDke. Inc. for the Desian of Liefer Road 16.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Norris-Repke, Inc., to provide Engineering Services for the design of Liefer Road, north of Nicolas Road for an amount not to exceed $59,098 pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. Temecula Senior Center PW 92-07 - Acceotance of a Grant of Easement - Sixth Street 17.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement and Grant of Easement with the State of California, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection accepting an easement for public roadway purposes; 17.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES AND ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, A PORTION OF THE CUL-DE-SAC AT THE NORTHEASTERLY END OF SIXTH STREET Conversion of City Vehicle to Alternative Fuel Source 19.1 Approve conversion of one vehicle to propane; 19.2 Appropriate $2,100 for the cost of conversion in the new AB 2766 Fund (Account Number 150-199-999-5250). Minutes~4\26~94 -5- 05112/94 City Counoil Minutes APril 26. 1994 20. 21. 22. 23. Acceot Public 22715-F -20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 Improvements and Substitute Bonds and Agreements in Tract No. Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22715-F; Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance, Street, Water and Sewer Bond amounts; Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Bond Riders; Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Acceot Public 22715-2 21.1 21.2 Imorovements and Substitute Bonds and Agreements in Tract No. Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22715-2; Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance, Street, Water and Sewer Bond amounts, accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Bond riders; 21.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Acceot Public Imorovements and Substitute Bonds and Aareements in Tract No. 22716-3 22.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22716-3; 22.2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance, Street, Water and Sewer Bond amounts; Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Bond riders; Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Public Imorovements in Tract No. 21674-3 22.3 22.4 AcCept 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21674-3; Authorize the reduction of Faithful Performance, Street, Sewer and Water Improvement Securities; Approve the subdivision agreement rider; Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer. Minutes%4\26%94 -6- 05112/94 City Council Minutes April 26, 1994 AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberrs NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz Professional Services with Norris-Raohe. Inc. for the Design of John Warner Road Councilmember Parks stated that there was an attempt to put together an assessment district on John Warner Road and asked if those plans can be used. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet stated NBS Lowry has access to those plans. Councilmember Parks stated he feels there may be a less expensive way to complete this project. Councilmember Birdsall stated that approval of this contract is based on approval of Service Level R. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: 7.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Norris-Raphe, Inc. to provide Engineering Services for the design of John Warner Road, from Cabrillo Avenue to Santiago Road, for an amount not to exceed $50,051 pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone Minutes\4\26\94 -7- 05112/94 City CounQil Minutes April 26. 1994 8. Professional Services with NBS Lowry 8.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and NBS/Lowry to provide Engineering Services for the design of Santiago Road, from 300 feet east of Vallejo Avenue to 1100 feet west of Avenida de San Pasqual, for an amount not to exceed $46,400 pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Stone, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks 12. Sister City Trio. Nakavama Town. Jaoan Councilmember Birdsall stated she feels there should be a cap placed on the spending for these trips. Mayor Roberrs stated the expenses are only for incidental expenses and gifts and should be close to the $500.00 amount. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 12.1 Approve the out-of-state travel of Councilmember J. Sal Mu~oz to Japan for City business-related purposes in conjunction with the formal signing of a Sister · Cities agreement with Nakayama Town, Japan. The motion was unanimously carried. 14. "No Parkinq" Zone on Marqarita Road from Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road from 6:00 AM to 4:00 PM Weekdays Councilmember Parks asked the reason for this restriction. Director of Public Works Serlet explained that requests have been received from people who use the Sports Park and have had difficulty finding a parking space. He also stated a problem with jay- walking by high school students could be eliminated with adoption of this "no parking" zone. Minutee~4\26\94 -8- 05112/94 CiW Council Minutes April 26, 1994 Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the school parking lot has ample parking. Director of Public Works Serlet answered that sufficient parking does exist. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA ROAD FROM 6:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. WEEKDAYS The motion was unanimously carried. 18. Contract Amendment No. 7 to Community Facilities District 88-12 Enaineering Services Contract with J.F, Davidson Associates, Inc. for the Overland Drive OvercrossinQ Imorovement Project Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked why this amendment is necessary. Director of Public Works Serlet reported that the Maintenance Section of Caltrans is concerned about the horizontal curve of the structure. Councilmember Parks expressed concern regarding the overall increases in the. project. Councilmember Mufioz suggested drafting a resolution to the Governor regarding concerns about making Caltrans more City and business friendly. Mayor Roberts stated he is meeting with Ken Steele, District Director of Caltrans and plans on discussing these issues with him. He stated he is in favor of drafting a resolution to the Governor. Councilmember Birdsall express concern about stopping a project mid-stream after so much work has been done. Councilmember Parks asked for a two week continuance on this item to allow him time to get a better understanding of the changes and exactly where this project stands. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mur~oz to continue this item to the meeting of May 10, 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes\4\26~94 -9- 05112/94 City Council Minutes Aoril 26. 1994 RECESS Mayor Roberts called a recess at 8:00 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the regularly scheduled Community Services Meeting and Redevelopment Agency meeting at 9:17 PM. PUBLIC HEARINGS 24. Proposed Ordinance Regardino Charitable. Relioious and Commercial solicitation Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report. Mayor Roberts reported an error in the staff report which should read "permits are issued for a two (2) month period," not a 6 month period. Councilmember Mu~oz asked if no restriction regarding hours of solicitation is the rule in California. City Attorney Peter Thorsen explained that · Court ruling has indicated prohibition of evening solicitation, when working people are at home, violated the solicitor's First Amendment rights. He also explained that all citizens have the right to put up a "no solicitors" sign. Mayor Roberrs opened the public hearing at 9:34 PM. Hearing no requests to speak, he closed the public hearing at 9:34 PM. Councilmember Parks setting suggested hours before 7:00 PM and seeking voluntary compliance. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation for 24.1 a.s follows: 24.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 90-04 PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL AND CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS AND ADDING CHAPTER 5.16 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR CHARITABLE, RELIGIOUS AND COMMERCIAL SOLICITATION The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes\4%26%94 -1 O- 05/12/94 Citv Council Minutes April 26. 1994 25. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation 24.2 as follows: 24.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 94-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A NON-REFUNDABLE PERMIT APPLICATION FEE FOR CHARITABLE, RELIGIOUS, AND COMMERCIAL SOLICITATION WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA The motion was unanimously.carried. Ordinance to Reduce Water Consumotion Through Efficient Landscaoe Desion Consistent with Provisions of AB 325 Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing at 9:40 PMo Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Roberts closed the public hearing at 9:40 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation 25.1 as follows: 25.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE DESIGN The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation 25.2 as follows: 25.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 9440 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A LIST OF PLANT MATERIALS WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE DESIGN The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes\4\26\94 -11 - 05112/94 CiW Council Minutes Aoril 26, 1994 Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked that a list of recommended plant materials be made available to home builders in the community, Director of Planning Thornhill stated he would place copies at the front counter. COUNCIL BUSINESS 26. Appointments to Old Town Local Review Board City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report. Mayor Pro Tem Stone suggested that each Councilmember suggest one person to serve on the board. Council consensus was obtained. Mayor Pro Tern Stone recommended Robert Lord, Councilmember Mur~oz recommended Robert Morris, Councilmember Parks suggested Robert Gorham, Mayor Roberts recommended Walt Allen and Councilmember Birdsall recommended Larry Markham. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to appoint Walt Allen, Robert Gorham, Robert Lord, Larry Markham and Robert Morris to terms of from one to three years to be determined by draw at the first meeting of the Board, and to appoint Bill Harker to serve as alternate for a one-year term. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Mur~oz to extend the meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. 27. Broadcast Soonsorshio of Council Meetinas Assistant City Manager Edvalson presented the staff report. Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated he is in support of allowing members of the community to sponsor the cost of producing the videos of City Council meetings. Councilmember Birdsall suggested providing public service announcements as well. Councilmember Parks stated it is his belief that the City Council meetings are televised as a public service and asked if advertising would jeopardize that arrangement. Assistant City Manager Edvalson stated the City has an opportunity, through Inland Cable, to establish a government channel. He reported the City has received a grant to purchase equipment, and suggested that sponsorships be considered in the future. Councilmember Parks stated he could support this program with the condition that this be investigated further to insure it is acceptable with the cable network. Staff direction was given to use the guidelines prepared to proceed with developing a sponsorship program and further directed that staff investigate and report back to the Minutes\4%26~,94 - 12- 05/12/94 City Council Minutes April 26, 1994 Council if this program is in any way unacceptable with the Cable network who carries the City Council meetings. 28. Procedures and Recommendations for Notice of Public Hearinos It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to continue this item to the meeting of May 10, 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. 29. Private Bus Benches in Public RiQht of Way Director of Public Works Tim Serlet presented the staff report. City Attorney Peter Thorson reported that two members of the City Council are Rotarians, Mayor Roberts and Councilmember Parks. He advised that if they are just members, they may participate, however, if they are on the Board, they cannot participate. Councilmember Parks stated he is a member of the Noon Rotary, but not on the Board, Mayor Roberts stated he is also a member of the Noon Rotary, but not on the Board. Evelyn Harker, 31130-85 South General Kearny, a member of the Temecula Sunrise Rotary, spoke in favor of allowing the Sunrise Rotary to continue this fund raising endeavor and listed the various benefits provided to the community, including scholarships for area high school students. RECESS Mayor Roberts called a recess at 1 O: 13 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 10:14PM. Charlie Nicholls, 41540 Via Del Monte, Temecula Sunrise Rotary, thanked the City of Temecula for allowing them the opportunity to have this project and stated the RTA has been extremely supportive. 'He stated Sunrise Rotary has committed all proceeds to the community, through donations to the CRC, Grad Nite, Promising Christmas, etc. Steven Ahlquist, 31265 Enfield Lane, Temecula Sunrise Rotary Club, spoke in favor of allowing the Sunrise Rotary to continue the private bus bench program and stated it is a "win, win situation" for the community. Councilmember Birdsall spoke in favor of this program stating it is a wonderful project which benefits the community. Councilmember Mu~oz spoke in opposition, based on aesthetics and his concern that one organization should not be given an advantage over another. Minutes%4\26%94 -13- 05112/94 City Council Minutes ADHI 26. 1994 30. 31. Councilmember Parks speaking in favor of the bus benches, stated the Rotary has purchased and furnished the benches and feels they need the opportunity to recover those costs. Mayor Pro Tem Stone also voiced his support of the program, stating the benches have been tastefully done and he appreciates the Rotary's efforts in the community, No formal action was taken on this matter. Status Report on Winchester Interchanoe. Overland Bridge, Winchester/Nicolas Siqnalization. Right Turn Lane at Pala Road/Hiohwav 79 South. Maraarita Road Widenino North of Rancho California Road It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to continue this item to the meeting of May 10, 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. Status of Proposed Downsizinc3 Ordinance Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Loren Rocheford, 41459 Cour Beaune, spoke in favor of the development of a Downsizing Ordinance, based on the need to protect property values. James E. Horn, 31467 Sonoma Lane, spoke in favor of a Downsizing Ordinance. Robert House, 32175 Placer Belair, spoke in support the development of a downsizing ordinance. Leo Carter, 32218 Placer Belair, spoke in favor of a downsizing ordinance. Carl Hoffman, 32202 Placer Belair, spoke against the development of a downsizing ordinance, and encouraged the community to allow development. Emile Haddad, 1 O0 Bayview Circle, #2000, Newport Beach, representing Bramalea, stated he has met with surrounding property owners and made changes based on their comments. He stated the builder is introducing a compatible product, using the same width across and explained that the largest homes will be placed next to existing homes. Director of Planning Thornhill stated this is a status report, however he will not be able to hold up permits for the building of homes within a specific plan in the absence of action to do so. Minutes\4\26\94 - 14- 05112/94 City Council Minutes April 26. 1994 Councilmember Parks voiced his support of cooperative efforts between developers and the community to resolve these issues, and said he feels new construction is beneficial to the City. The report was received and filed. CITY MANAGER REPORTS None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to adjourn at 11: 14 PM to a meeting on May 2, 1994, 7:00 PM at city Hall for a continuation of the Closed Session. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutes\4%26~94 - 15- 05112/94 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MAY 2, 1994 A special meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:17 PM, in the Council Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, None Also present was City Manager Ronald E. Bradley Mur%oz, Stone, Parks, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments were offered at this time. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Executive Session It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, to adjourn the meeting at 7:25 PM to an Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 to interview candidates from the Law firm of Burke, Williams and Sorensen for the position of City Attorney. The motion was unanimously carried. The meeting was reconvened in regular session at 8:25 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, to direct staff to prepare a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPOINTING THE CITY ATTORNEY AND ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEYS and to place it for formal adoption on the agenda of the meeting of May 10, 1994 meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Minutes-512194 -1 - 05/04/94 City Council Minutes May 2, 1994 CITY MANAGER REPORTS No report given. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 PM to a regular meeting to be held at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, May 10, 1994. ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk Ron Roberts, Mayor Minutes-5/2/94 -2- 05/04/94 mm mm M NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEI~_,CULA AILOWING CERTAIN .CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXl/IBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ~ OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $541,0 47.90. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 24th day of May, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 5h~aoa 19 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of May, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCILbFF-MBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk 5~?.sos 19 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 05/05/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/11194 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/24/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/05/94 TOTAL PAYROLL: $188,240.29 $106,252.17 $128.104.78 $108,450.66 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 05/24/94 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 250 TCSD.-CIP 280 RDA-CIP 30~ SELF-INSURANCE VEHICLES 3._ INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER 340 FACILITIES $91,856.85 $32,436.88 $75,0,49.29 $15,860.34 $2(X).87 $5,046.94 $148,897.70 $20,180.54 $1,962.82 $4,753.61 $31,342.70 $432,597.24 PAYROLL. 001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) 100 GAS TAX (PAYROLL) 190 TCSD (PAYROLL) 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B (PAYROLL) 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PA~ROLL) 28O RDA*CIP 300 SELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL) 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) 330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) 340 FACILITIES $65,792.92 $17,209.74 $17,476.06 $447.92 844.68 $1,735.69 896.04 $552.35 $1,199.69 $1,611.00 $108,450.86 TOTAL BY FUND: . HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 05/05/94 16:26 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REG/STER FOR ALL PERIODS 11 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES D/STRiCT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CiP 300 iNSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORMAT]ON SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER FUND 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AMOUNT 75,778.47 15,585.32 ~9,367.86 14,691.69 ~00.87 1~978.Z5 781.28 18,165.5~ 545.96 1,159.69 4,710.5Z 4,462.9'5 31,0~1.91 198,240.29 VOUCHr PAGE 1 05/05 16:24 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 14806 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 331934 33197 33193, 331934 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 380894 14815 CHECK DATE 04/29/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 ~/05/94 J5/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 VENDOR NUMBER 000674 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028,3 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000558 VENDOR NAME CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CIT FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX ([RS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (]RS) FIRSTAX (]RS) FIRSTAX (]RS) FIRSTAX (]RS) FIRSTAX (]RS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX CIRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) ADVANCED MOBILECONM ITEM DESCRIPT]OR REGISTRAT]ON/RON PARKS 000283 FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 000261 FEDERAL 000261 FEDERAL 000261 FEDERAL 000261 FEDERAL 000261 FEDERAL 000261 FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 000261 FEDERAL 000261 FEDERAL 000261 MEDICARE 000261 MEDICARE 000261 MEDICARE 000261 NED[CARE 000261 MEDICARE 000261 MEDICARE 000261 MEDICARE 000261 NEDICARE 00028~ MEDICARE 000261 MEDICARE 000261 MED1CARE 00044~ SOl 000444 SOl 00042~-+ SOl 000444 SDI 000444 SO l 000444 SO l 000444 SO 1 000444 SO l 000444 SO l O00z~ SO I 000/~4 SOl 000/~4 STATE 00044~ STATE 000444 STATE 000~ STATE O00z~4~ STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE MOBILE SERV. ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-100-999-5258 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 320-199-999-5208 ITEM AMOUNT 285.00 9,542.42 2,968.65 2,387.51 88.48 44.11 252.27 131.43 ?7.87 246.24 89.27 76.07 2,453.03 642.68 627.38 17.70 26.54 62.04 31.70 20.43 54.08 22.86 52.00 1,088.71 288.09 281.23 7.93 11.90 27.81 14.20 9.15 24.25 10.25 23.31 2,452.50 720.17 501.75 22.72 1.26 50.79 29.50 25.96 55.29 15.71 6.68 738.00 CHECK AMOUNT 285.00 19,914.76 5,669.16 738. O0 1481 ,/05/94 000105 AEI SECURITY, INC. ALARM NONITORING/CH ~40-199-999-5250 35.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 05/05/94 16:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER ZTEN ANOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 14816 05/05/94 000105 /tEl SECURITY, INC. ALARN NONITORING; BLDG- 340-199-999-5250 70.00 105.00 14817 05/05/94 001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR - S.D MARCH CELLULAR PHONE/NJ 001-140-999-5208 155.27 155.27 14818 05/05/94 001427 ALVAREZ, THERESA REINS FOR SIERRA CONF 001-162-999-5258 51.31 51.31 14819 05/05/94 001422 AMERICAN ASSOC. OF STAT GUIDE TO NETRIC CONV. 001-163-999-5228 18.90 18.90 14820 05/05/94 000745 AT & T - CELLULAR 619-987-1828/NJ 001-140-999-5208 12.72 12.72 14821 05/05/94 001424 AUDIENCES UNLINITED, IN BUS OVERTINE 190-183-999-5350 150.00 150.00 14822 05/05/94 000676 AUTONOTIVE SPECIALTIES DISTANCE NETER 100-164-999-5215 14822 05/05/94 000676 AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES DISTANCE NETER INSTALLA 100-164-999-5215 14822 05/05/94 000676 AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES NISC. REPAIRS/STENCIL T 100-164-999-5610 100.00 109.18 138.64 347.82 14823 05/05/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 14823 05/05/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 100-2310 14823 05/05/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 14823 05/05/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 191-2310 14823 05/05/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193-2~10 14823 05/05/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 14823 05/05/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-2310 14823 05/05/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 330-2~10 14823 05/05/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 14823 05/05/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 VIS COBR 001-1180 385.04 131.92 97.15 4.14 5.06 9.45 3.94 15.75 15.75 24.95 693.15 14824 05/05/94 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL REPAIR 193-180-999-5415 220.00 220.00 14825 05/05/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 23 001-1500 15,744.68' 15,744.68 14826 05/05/94 000122 BSN SPORTS TAX ON CRC SPORTS EQUIP 190-180-999-5301 14826 05/05/94 000122 BSN SPORTS 2215 XXXY PRO O014N COLO 190-180-999-5301 14826 05/05/94 000122 BSN SPORTS WCMDK250 FIRST AID KIT 190-180-999-5301 14826 05/05/94 000122 BSN SPORTS FREIGHT 190-180-999-5301 14826 05/05/94 000122 'BSN SPORTS TAX 190-180-999-5301 333.07 103.60 144.00 24.76 19.19 624.62 14827 05/05/94 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS PAPER SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220 45.54 45.54 14828 05/05/94 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, RENEWAL/BOND 14828 05/05/94 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, PRO-RATE CANCELLATION 300-199-999-5200 300-199-999-5200 500.00 400.00- 100.00 14829 05/05/94 000837 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 FRAN TAX 001-2140 14829 05/05/94 000837 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 FRAN TAX 100-2140 93.96 93.96 187.92 14830 05/05/94 000924 CAPPO, INC. 1994 DUES 001-140-999-5226 45.00 45.00 14831 05/05/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER OVERLAY 100-164-999-5244 14831 05/05/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER 200 RIVETS/SIGN REPAIR 100-164-999-5244 14831 05/05/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER TAX 100-164-999-5244 14831 05/05/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER 8 TENECULA SISTER CITIE 100-164-999-5244 47.41 120.00 9.30 638.00 VOUCHP CITY OF TEMECULA 05/05. 16:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 14831 05/05/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER TAX 100-164-999-52~ 14831 05/05/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGNS 100-164-999-5244 14832 05/05/94 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA PAYMENT OF PHONE SYSTEH 320-2800 14832 05/05/94 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA PAYMENT OF PHONE SYSTEM 320-199-999-5391 49.45 48.49 1,157.31 270.26 912.65 1,427.57 14833 05/05/94 000642 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX MAINTAIN BALANCE 001-1020 14833 05/05/94 000642 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX MAINTAIN BALANCE 190-1020 14833 05/05/94 000642 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX MAINTAIN BALANCE 100'1020 14833 05/05/94 000642 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX MAINTAIN BALANCE 300'1020 14833 05/05/94 000642 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX MAINTAIN BALANCE 280'1020 14833 05/05/94 000642 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX MAINTAIN BALANCE 330-1020 3,243.12 726.66 40.59 21.25 2.00 16.25 4,049.87 14854 05/05/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 1500 A&S 190-2~30 14834 05/05/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN 000140 600 A&S 190-2330 14834 05/05/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 001-2330 14834 05/05/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN 000140 CANCER 100-2330 14834 05/05/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 190-2330 14834 05/05/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 191-2330 14834 05/05/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 193-2330 14834 05/05/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 280-2330 · 1487 V05/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 330-2330 1483~ ~5/05/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 340-2330 22.00 39.75 126.85 9.75 70.25 11.48 14.02 3.90 19.50 25.50 343.00 14835 05/05/94 001193 COMP USA, INC. 875484 SEKURIT CABLE SY 320-199-999-5221 14835 05/05/94 001193 CONP USA, INC. TAX 320-199-999-5221 14835 05/05/94 001193 COHP USA, INC. 863701 15FT PAR CABLE 320-199-999-5221 14835 05/05/94 001193 COMP USA, INC. TAX 320-199-999-5220 14835 05/05/94 001193 CONP USA, INC. TAX 320-199-999-5221 67.4~ 13.23 23,96 1.34 .34 106.31 14836 05/05/94 000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET ANTENNA 320-199-999-5209 23.71 23.71 14837 05/05/94. 000155 DAVLIN AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING 001-161-999-5250 14837 05/05/94 000155 DAVLIN AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING 001-161-999-5250 150.00 150.00 · 300.00 14838 05/05/94 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 ADMINFEE 001-2340 14838 05/05/94 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 14838 05/05/94 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 100-2340 15.00 29.86 14.93 59.79 14839 05/05/94 001245 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVIC HAZ-MAT STORAGE 100-164-999-5430 323.26 323.26 14840 05/05/94 000453 ECONOMICS PRESS, INC. T RENEWAL 001-162-999-5228 38.56 38.56 14841 05/05/94 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY DAY PLANNERS/LAUBER/CAS 001-163-999-5220 79.90 79.90 14842 05/05/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 21.68 21.68 14843 05/05/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN TEN AT&T FACEPLATES 14843 05/05/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN CREDIT 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5242 20.48 10.65- 1484,, ,/05/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS 001-2360 526.31 VOUCHRE2 05/05/94 16:24 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER/OOS "4 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 14844 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000?65 000765 GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS 000765' LIFE INS 000765 . LIFE INS 000765 LIFE INS 000765 LIFE INS 000765 LIFE INS' 000765 LIFE INS 000765 LIFE INS 000765 LIFE INS 000765 LIFE INS 000765 LTO 000765 LTD 000765 LTD 000765 LTO 000765 LTO 000765 LTD 000765 LTO 000765 LTD 000765 LTO 000765 LTD 000765 LTD 000765 STD 000765 STD 000765 STD 000765 STD 000765 STD 000765 STD 000765 STD 000765 STD 000765 STD 000765 STD 000765 STD 14845 05/05/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOLE DE 14845 05/05/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 14845 05/05/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 14845 05/05/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE 100-2360 190-2360 191-2360 192-2360 193-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2]60 330-2360 340-2360 001-2180 100-2380 190-2180 191-2180 192-2180 193-2180 280-2380 300-2380 320-2]80 330-2380 340-2380 001-2500 100-2500 190-2500 191-2500 192-2500 193-2500 280-2500 300-2500 320-2500 330-2500 340-2500 001-2510 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 128.25 133.00 4.27 9.50 14.73 5.70 4.74 9.50 9.50 19.00 821.25 227.00 194.67 5.89 8.25 20.91 13.29 7.76 18.67 8,72 18.42 182.82 49.47 42.82 1.29 1.81 4.61 2.92 1.71 4.11 1.92 4.05 161.80 105.90 11.40 44.50 2,506.86 3 23.60 14846 14846 14846 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 000184 000184 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA GTE CALIFORNIA GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR INCORPOR INCORPOR 909-695-3539 909-699-0128 909-699-2309 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 20.91 289.11 22.94 332.96 14847 14847 14847 14847 14848 14848 14848 14848 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 000378 00O378 000378 000378 000186 000186 000186 000186 HAFELI, THONAS HAFELI, THOMAS HAFELI, THOMAS HAFELI, THOMAS HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE RENTAL CAR/REIMB, RENTAL CAR/REIMB, EXPENSE RE]MB\CONF, RENTAL CAR\RE]MB MISC, SMALL TOOLS & SUP NISC. HARDWARE SUPPLIES MISC, SUPPLIES MISC. SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5258 001-161-999-5258 320-199-999-5258 001-140-999-5258 340-199-999-5242 340-199-999-5242 100-164-999-5242 100-164-999-5242 50.77 50.77 289.34 50.77 59.20 150.79 6.79 29.57 441.65 VOUCHr 05/05, 16:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 14848 05/05/94 000186 14848 05/05/94 000186 14849 05/05/94 14850 05/05/94 000194 14850 05/05/94 000194 14850 05/05/94 000194 14850 05/05/94 000194 14850 05/05/94 000194 14850 05/05/94 000194 14850 05/05/94 000194 14851 05/05/94 001351 14851 05/05/94 001351 14852 05/05/94 001340 14853 05/05/94 001407 1485~---05/05/94 000204 148! ;/05/94 000204 1485~ d5/05/94 000204 14854 05/05/94 000204 14854 05/05/94 000204 14855 05/05/94 14856 05/05/94 001420 14857 05/05/94 14858 05/05/94 000886 14859 05/05/94 000205 14860 05/05/94 001123 14860 05/05/94 001123 14860 05/05/94 001123 14860 05/05/94 001123 14860 05/05/94 001123 14861 05/05/94 000209 14862 05/05/94 000669 14863 05/05/94 000414 14864 05/05/94 000220 1486. J/05/94 00097~ VENDOR NAME HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HAYES, MEG ]CNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 ]CMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 ]CMA RETIREMENT T~UST 4 ]CMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC INLAND EMPIRE ECONUMIC INNOVATIVE IMAGES INTERVALLEY POOL SUPPLY J.R. FREEMAN CO, INC. J.R. FREEMAN CO, INC. J.R. FREEMAN CO, INC. J.R. FREEMAN CO, INC. J.R. FREEMAN CO, INC. JOHNSON, BRENDA JOLLY JUMPS: AKA: MIKE KALE, MELANIE KHALSA, ATMA KAUR KIDS PARTIES, ETC. KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPL]E KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE L & M FERTILIZER, INC. LEAGUE - INLAND EMPIRE LONGS DRUG STORE NAURICE PRINTERS, INC. MIRACLE RECREATION EQU] CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER]ODS I TEN DESCRXPTIOR ~UPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT MISC. HARDWARE SUPPLIES HAYES/REFUND 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF CONP REG I STRAT I ON/MJ REG I STRAT Z ON/CM DESIGNS FOR TWO EVENTS MISC. POOL SUPPLIES IBM WHEELWRITER 1500 OAK TOP TYPING STAND PRESTIGE ELITE 12P O01- TAX TAX TCSD REFUND/JOHNSON BRE ENTERTAINMENT CRC TCSD REFUND/KALE YOGA FOR VITALITY CLASS ENTERTAINMENT FOR CRC 521-11423 MINERS PICK 89818 SURVEY VEST (2) X 126-084 ENGINEER RULES 785-204 NYLON STRING TAX SHALL EQUIP. MEETING APRIL 27/MUNOZ FILM SUPPLIES LOGOS/PROCLANAT IONS #168-907 TWISTER SLIDE ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-~-5212 :~0-1~-~-5242 190-183-4982 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 191-2080 193-2080 280-2080 300-2080 001-140-999-5261 001-110-999-5258 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5212 001-163-999-5610 001-16~-~-5242 001-163-~-5242 001-163-~-5610 001-163-~-5242 190-183-4982 190-183-~-5370 190-183-4982 190-18~-~-5330 190-183-9~-5370 001-163-~9-5218 001-163-~9-5218 001-163-999-5218 001-163-~-5218 001-163-~-5218 100-164-~-5218 001-100-999-5258 190-180-~-5250 001'100-~-5258 190-180-~-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 129.67 137.26 42.00 1,808.96 398.21 496.96 34.08 41.66 5.00 25.36 10.00 10.00 280.15 768.26 525.00 125.00 30.40 40.68 12.05 35.00 75.00 35.00 25.20 100.00 24,41 10.01 51.90 12.39 7.65 74.33 20.00 28.53 98.05 162.00 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 513.28 42.00 2,810.23 20.00 280.15 768.26 35.00 75.00 35.00 25.20 100.00 106.36 74.33 20.00 28.53 98.05 VOUCHRE2 05/05/94 16:24 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 14865 148&5 1486~ 14867 14867 14867 14867 14867 14867 14867 14867 14867 14867 14867 14868 14869 14869 14870 14871 14872 14873 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 14874 CHECK DATE 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 VENDOR NUMBER 000973 000973 000649 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000915 000239 000239 001206 001243 000472 001423 000245 000245 '000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NIRACLE RECREAT]OR EOUI FREIGHT MIRACLE RECREATION EGUI TAX MUNOZ, SAL J. NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH~ NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIA OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC 4/20-4/21 CONF. 000431 AOMINFEE 000431 DENT COD 000431 DENTAL 000431 DENTAL 000431 OENTAL 000431 OENTAL 000431 OENTAL 000431 OENTAL 000431 DENTAL 000431 OENTAL 000431 DENTAL ERRORS & ONISSINS INS JOYNCE FONTANA WE 04/10 ~E 4/17/94 PACIFIC SOUTHWEST BIOLO SURVEY PALMQUIST, MARY PARADISE CHEVROLET PECHANGA RESERVATION AN PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PERS (HEALTH [NSUR.PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREM BRIDGE CLASS BLAZER MAINTENANCE SETTLEMENT/SPORTS CONPL 000245 ADMINFEE 000245 AETNA SO 000245 AETNA SO 000245 BLSHIELD 000245 BLSHIELD 000245 CALlCARE OO0245 CIGNA 000245 CIGNA 000245 CZGNA 000245 CIGNA 000245 EMP DED 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 KAISERSO 000245 KAISERSO 000245 PACIFZCR ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-100-999-5258 001-2340 001-1180 001-2340 100-2340 190-23~0 191-23~0 193-2340 280-23~0 300-23~0 330-23~0 3~0-2340 001-120-999-5250 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 210-199-128-5802 190-183-999-5330 310-110-999-5214 280-199-802-5700 001 °2090 001-2090 190 - 2090 001-2090 1 O0 - 2090 1 O0 - 2090 O01 - 2090 1 O0 - 2090 280 - 2090 300-2090 001-2090 001-2090 1 O0 - 2090 190-2090 191-2090 193-2090 330-2090 340- 2090 001-2090 190-2090 001 °2090 ITEM AMOUNT 89.74 12.56 50.63 15.00 32.50 538.71 178.73 130.00 7.31 8.94 9.73 4.06 16.25 16.25 32.00 364. O0 473.20 748.35 257.60 345.80 17,500.00 109.08 892.00 410.00 323. O0 415.00 401.53 1,911,37 325.08 101.99 478.09 3,089.91 1,157.82 1,806,92 135.95 166.16 302.11 416.95 978.36 815.30 422.13 CHECK ANdUNT 264.30 50.63 957.50 32.00 ?~o.35 257.60 345.80 17,500.00 VOUCF' CITY OF TENECULA 05/0: 16:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR iTEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 14874 05/05/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245 PACXFXCR 100-2090 14874 05/05/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245 PACIFICR 190-2090 14874 05/05/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245 PAC[FZCR 193-2090 14874 05/05/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREM 000245 PC 001-2090 14874 05/05/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 14874 05/05/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245 PERS CHO 100-2090 14874 05/05/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREM 000245 TAKECARE 001-2090 14874 05/05/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245 TAKECARE 100-2090 14874 05/05/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR.PREM 000245 TAKECARE 280-2090 14874 05/05/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245 TAKECARE 300-2090 584.25 739.28 303.58 1,046.71 1,590.87 373.00 1,740.20 595.87 170.18 41.88 21,924.35 14873 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET%REM 000246 PER REDE 001-2130 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REOE 100-2130 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET . 001-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 100-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 190-2~90 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 191-Z~90 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 1487~ 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 14[ 5/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 148~. 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 ' SURVIVOR 320-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 14875 05/05/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 107.35 107.35 10,269.56 2,732.33 2,473.59 80.06 96.57 284.39 155.58 95.94 232.35 104.86 222.10 53.96 12.54 13.02 .42 .93 1.44 .56 .93 .93 1.86 17,049.08 14876 05/05/94 001280 PETROLANE - REPAIRS PROPANE 310-162-999-5214 266.30 266.30 14877 05/05/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CUMPAN 5/13-8/11 190-180-999-5226 23.92 23.92 14878 05/05/94 000992 RAMONA TIRE, INC. BRAKES 310-164-999-5214 14878 05/05/94 000992 RAMONA TIRE, INC. B&S VEHICLE SERVICE 310-162-999-5214 268.48 219.64 488.12 14879 05/05/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 2/24-3/30 190-180-999-5240 66.84 14880 05/05/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL MISC. SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 24.34 24.34 14881 05/05/94 001426 RANCHO MUSIC ASSOCIATIO REFUND/SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-183-4990 100.00 100.00 148' 5/05/94 001428 RANCHO TEMECULA WONANS CSF PROGRAM 001-100-999-5267 2,500.00 2,500.00 VOUCHRE2 8 05/05/94 16:24 CITY OF TENECtJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 14883 05/05/94 000266 RIGHTMAY CiTY YARD PORTIBLE TOLI 100-164-~9-5;238 14884 05/05/94 000268 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITA APRIL K-RAT 001-2300 14885 05/05/94 001097 RODLINE PRODUCTS, INC. SERVICE KITS & SPARE PA 100-16~-999-5242 14885 05/05/94 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC. TAX 100-16~-999-5242 14886 05/05/94 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. 14887 05/05/94 000815 ROWLEY, CATHERINE 14888 05/05/94 001333 SERLETT, TIM 4/18"4/20 CONF. TAP DANCE CLASS 3/2~-3/25 TS 001-100-999-5258 190-183-999-5330 001-163-999-5261 :190-180-999-5212 14889 05/05/94 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL MAINTENANCE 14890 05/05/94 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA SYSTEM MODIFICAT 320-199-999-5250 14891 05/05/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY 14891 05/05/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY 14891 05/05/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY 14891 05/05/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY 14891 05/05/94 000285 SIR SPEEOY 500 BUSINESS CARDS; B/W 001-140-999-5220 TAX 001-140-999-5220 BUS. CARDS 001-100-999-5258 PHILLIP O. SMITH 001-162-999-5222 TAX 001-162-999-5222 INDISPENSABLE ASST SEMI 190-180-999-5258 14892 05/05/94 000751 SKILLPATH, INC. 3/2~-4/21 3/2~-4/21 3/28-4/25 3/28-4/25 3/28-4/25 14893 05/05/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 14893 05/05/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 14893 05/05/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 14893 05/05/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 14893 05/05/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 14894 05/05/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/28-3/31 14894 05/05/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 2/28-3/31 14895 05/05/94 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 3/17-4/15 14895 05/05/94 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS MAR ZS-APR, 25 14896 05/05/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-4761/SM 14897 05/05/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T B&S VEHICLE SERVICE 14897 05/05/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T OIL CHANGE BOOT REIMB. 14898 05/05/94 001417 STERLING, STEVEN 3/7-3/14 COMF. 14899 05/05/94 000752 STONE, JEFFREY E. ENTERTAINMENT CRC 14900 05/05/94 001418 SUDS 100-164-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 001-100-999-5208 310-162-999-5214 310-16~-999-5214 190-180-999-5243 001-100-999-5258 190-18~-999-5370 14901 05/05/94 000574 SUPER TONER 14901 05/05/94 000574 SUPER TONER HP-]]-lll LASERJET CART 320-199-999-5221 TAX 320-199-999-5221 ITEM AMOUNT 57.39 1,000.00 816.28 63.26 60.00 112.00 38.42 942.40 340.00 27.70 2.15 126.47 27.70 2.15 99.00 27.42 672.61 2,712.98 3,072.42 499.8/+ 11,338.59 18.40 1,448.59 29.62 223.00 38.48 20.~ 86.18 266.37 125.00 450.00 34.88 CHECK AN(XJNT 57.39 1,000.00 879.54 60.00 112,00 38.42 942.40 340.00 ,7 99.00 6,985.27 11,356.99 22~.00 59.47 86.18 266.37 125.00 8 VCXJCHR~ PAGE 9 05/0.~ 16:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 14902 14903 14904 14904 14905 14906 14907 14907 14907 14908 14908 14909 14909 1490~, 149 14910 14910 14910 14910 14910 14910 14910 14911 14911 14911 14911 14911 14911 14912 14912 14912 14913 14914 14915 14915 CHECK DATE 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 ~5/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 OS/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 VENDOR NUMBER 000302 000305 000168 000168 000919 000998 000320 000320 000320 000322 000322 00O325 000325 000325 000325 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 000389 000389 000389 001209 000539 000342 000342 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. TARGET STORE TEMECtJLA FLOWER CORRAL TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED TEMECULA VLLY NATAL LIT TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS UNIGLQBE BUTTERFIELD TR UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR 2410SK; KEYBOARD DRAWER 001-140-999-5242 RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 FLOWERS FL(NERS/MEMONIAL RENTAL DAY CAMP 001-162-999-5260 001-120-999-5220 190-183-999-5340 CS FUNDING 001-100-999-5267 OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 001-16S-999-5220 AIRFARE TO CHICAGO/MUNOZ 001-100-999-5258 AIRFARE/MAY 11-13/RP 001-100-999-5258 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE IN 001-2120 IN 100-2120 IN 190-2120 IN 280-2120 FLOOR MAT RENTAL & CLEA UNIFORM RENTAL MISC. UNIFORM MAINT. MISq. UNIFORM MAINT. FLOOR MATS RENT/CLEANIN CLEAN MATS FLOOR MAT RENT & CLEANI 190-180-999-5250 100-16~-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 340-199-999-5250 ~40-199-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP. 001065 DEF CO~.P 001-2080 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP 100-2080 USCM/PEBSCO (OEF. COMP. 001065 OEF CONP 190-Z080 USCN/PEBSCO (OEF. CONP. 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP. 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF, CONP. 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 USCM/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 USCM/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 100-2160 USCM/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 VAULT, THE WIMMER YAMADA ASSOCIATE WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC STORAGE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5250 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 210-190-120-580Z MAY RENT CREDIT/REPAIRS 340-199-999-5234 340-199-999-5212 210,12 28.03 25.27 63.03 6,912.00 2,000.00 46.81 53.23 948.00 129.00 78.90 1.00 17.00 .60 84.25 23.00 18.85 18.85 30.75 30.75 90.99 2,265.03 197.98 156.32 3.46 312.50 50.00 88.86 96. O0 247.86 186.02 32.93 29,780.55 349.02- 210.12 28.03 88.30 6,912.00 2,000.00 122.48 1,077.00 97.50 297.44 2,985.29 432.72 186.02 32.93 29,431.53 149' q5/05/94 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI METER USAGE 330-199-999-5Z39 859.10 14~ j5/05/94 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI LEASE AGREEMENT/MAY 330-199-999-5239 2,969.95 3,.829.05 VOUCHRE2 05/05/94 16:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 14917 05/05/94 14917 05/05/94 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000347 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 000347 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION M]SC. HEDICAL SUPPLIES TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 3~0-199-999-5242 340-199-999-5242 I T EM AMOUNT 110.15 8.54 CHECK AMOUNT 118.69 TOTAL CHECKS 198,24'0.29 VOUCH; PAGE 6 05/12, 11:31 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COle4UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C ZlO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER FUND 340 FACILITIES ANOUNT 11,2~.88 1,000.70 22,282.08 1,168.65 806.69 68,316.95 9.50 803.13 43.09 190.71 330.79 TOTAL 106,252.17 VOUCHRE2 ~ 05/lZ/94 11:31 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 14918 14919 14925 14925 14926 14926 14926 14926 14926 14926 14926 14926 14926 14926 14926 14926 14926 14927 14928 14928 14928 14928 14928 14928 14928 14928 14928 14929 14930 14930 14930 14931 14932 14933 14934 14935 14936 CHECK DATE 05/06/94 05/10/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 VENDOR NUMBER 001419 001402 000885 000885 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 001391 000102 000680 000680 000680 000680 000680 000680 000680 000680 000680 001104 000427 000~27 OOC~Z7 001445 001430 000120 001442 001436 VENDOR NAME FRANKLIN HAYNES MARlONE TEMECULA SISTER CITY AS ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH K[EFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH K[EFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C AMS-TMS AMS-TMS AMS-TMS AMS-TMS AMS-TMS AMS-TMS AMS-TMS AMS-TMS AMS-TMS ARNA INTERNATIONAL ARTESIA IMPLEMENT ARTESIA IMPLEMENT ARTESIA IMPLEMENT ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TE ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CONP BEVERLY HILLS, CITY OF BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER BOUQUET CORRAL BROWN, CONN[E CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ENTERTAINMENT CRC JAPAN TRIP EXPENSES SUBSCRIPTION TO THE ACC TAX 691004 RED NYLON LANYA 691001 DELUXE WHISTLE 600520 PROTECTIVE WHIST 900700 LIFEGUARD HAT 620042 RESCUE TUBE 600024 24'1 RING BUOY 620037 RING BUOY HOOKS 620030 RING BUOY THROU 620043 RESCUE CAN 601253 CROOK/POLE 12' 600541 SPINE BOARD (HE FRE I GHT TAX FENCE RENTAL ONE MONTH POSTAGE POSTAGE POSTAGE POSTAGE POSTAGE POSTAGE POSTAGE POSTAGE POSTAGE MEMBERSHIP/GZ TCSD TRACTOR REPAIR REPAIR OF TCSD TRACTOR MISC. REPAIR & MAINTENA CSF PROGRAM ATLANTIC RICHFIELD/REFU RETIREMENT LUNCH SCCCA PLAN & ZONE COURSE FLOUERS/RW PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-18~-999-5370 001-100-999-5258 001-170-999-5261 001-170-999-5261 190-18~-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-18~-999-5310 190-18~-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-185-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-18~-999-5310 190-18~-999-5310 190-18~-999-5310 190-18~-999-5310 190-18~-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-180-999-5238 001-100-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-163-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 001-120-999-5226 310-180-999-5214 310-180-999-5214 310-180-999-5214 001-100-999-5267 001-2670 001-120-999-5260 001-161-999-5258 001-2170 190-18,3-999-5330 ITEM AMOUNT 200.00 2,280.00 68.00 1.00 10.00 30.00 16.00 128.00 103.50 120.00 47.50 25.00 86.40 50.00 229.00 55.47 .01 145.00 3.48 40.37 208.21 /+46.17 132.70 149.55 30.03 12,3.42 145.81 120.00 176.81 194.91 236.68 1,000.00 1,500.00 80.00 263.00 32.33 40.00 CHECK AMOtmT 200.00 2,280.00 69.00 900.88 O0 1,279.74 120.00 608.40 1,000.00 1,500.00 80.00 263.00 32.33 O0 VOUCHP C%TY OF TENECULA 05/12, 11:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 14937 05/11/94 001431 BUILDERS BOOK, ]NC, STATE ACCESSIBILITY 14938 05/11/94 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA ADJ FOR UNDERBILLING 14939 05/11/94 000/,73 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPHEN LMI HOUSING SEMINAR/MJM 001-140-999-5261 14940 05/11/94 CARIELLO, CAROLYN CAREILLO/REFUND 14941 05/11/94 CARRENO, OOALYS CARRENO/REFUND 14942 05/11/94 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE 14942 05/11/94 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC FIRE ALARM MONITOR]NG; 14943 05/11/94 001139 CHIP MORTON PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO ENLARGEMENT 14944 05/11/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 14944 05/11/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 14944 05/11/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 14944 05/11/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 14945 q5/11/94 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE 14940 d5/11/94 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. 14947 05/11/94 000175 GFOA POSTAGE/MJ POSTAGE/FIN OVERNIGHT HAIL OVERNIGHT HAIL SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT MISC. COFFEE SUPPLIES ROBERTS REGISTRATION 14948 05/11/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 14948 05/11/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES 14949 05/11/94 0012/,4 GREENBERG, KRISTIN 80X CONTRACT CLASS 14950 05/11/94 00Cl~23 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU REC SUPPLIES 1495O 05/11/94 000423 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES 14951 05/11/94 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 14952 05/11/94 000806 HOWARD, BOBBY 14953 05/11/94 000736 IPS SERVICES, INC. 14953 05/11/94 000756 IPS SERVICES, INC. 14954 05/11/94 001186 IRWIN, JOHN HARDWARE 80X CONTRACT CLASS PUJOL WIDENING RETENTION 80X CONTRACT CLASS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5228 190-180-999-5250 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 001-100-999-5258 001-140-~-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 250-190-129-5804 190-180-999-5212 340-199-999-5250 001-140-999-5258 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-18~-999-5330 190-180-999-5301 190-182-999-5301 190-18~-999-5380 190-18~-999-5330 210-165-628-580~ 210-2035 190-183-999-5330 14955 05/11/94 000202 J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE SPORTS PARK LAKE DISTIL 001-163-999-5250 210-2035 210-166-627-580~ 190-180-999-5212 14956 05/11/94 001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD. RETENTION 14956 05/11/94 001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD. LIEFER ROAD AT NICOLAS 14957 05/11/94 001421 KEITH MCCANN PLUMBING PLUMBING REPAIR 1495~ ~/11/94 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, [ NlSC SUPPLIES & SERVICE 330-199-999'5220 ITEM AMOUNT 33.98 360.40 190.00 22. O0 25.00 29.00 24. O0 174.56 19.75 6.75 15.25 9.50 64.09 143.90 1,250.00 37.44 18.43 332.80 43.94 17.20 320.00 60,495.38 6,049.54- 369.60 400.00 1,431.03- 14,310.31 470.44 40.71 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 33.98 360.40 190.00 22. O0 25.00 53. O0 174.56 51.25 64°09 143.90 1,250. O0 55.87 332.80 61.16 320.00 54,445.84 369.60 400.00 12,879.28 470.44 40.71 VOUCHRE2 05 / 12/96 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 16959 16960 16960 14960 16961 14962 16963 16963 16963 14963 16966 16965 16965 16966 16966 14967 14967 14967 14967 14967 14967 14967 14967 14967 14967 14968 14969 14970 14971 14971 14972 14972 14972 14972 14973 14973 1497'3 11:31 CHECK DATE 05/11/96 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/96 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 VENDOR NUMBER 001329 000209 000209 000209 000214 001~,0 000228 000228 000228 000228 001438 000587 000587 000248 000248 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000269 000249 000249 000253 000255 001432 000947 000947 000262 000262 000262 000262 000907 000907 000907 VENDOR NAME KOHLHAAS, JEANNETTE L & N FERTILIZER, INC. L & M FERTILIZER, ]NC. L & M FERTILIZER, INC. LUNCH & STUFF CATERING NATROS, ALORA MOBIL MOBIL MOBIL MOBIL NC~REY, JODI MUNOZ, MARION. MUNOZ, NARION. PETROLANE PETROLANE PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH POSTMASTER PRO LOCK & KEY PUBLIC SERVICE SKILLS, RANCNO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CALIFORNIA gATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA gATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCNO .CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO CAR WASH CITY OF TEMEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOB ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 80~ CONTRACT CLASS EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES NISC, PARTS AND EQUIPRE SHALL EQUIPMENT 05/10/94 COUNCIL MTG PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR FUEL/I~ FUEL/IN FUEL/TCSD FUEL/B&S PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR JANITORIAL SERVICES JANITORIAL SERVICES FUEL/TCSD FUEL/TCSD PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REIMB. RENEgAL MAILING PERMIT SPORTS PARK KEYS & WORK C%TY MANAGER SEARCH BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION 3/09-4/13 3/03-4/07 3/03-4/07 3/03-4/07 CAR WASHES CAR WASHES CAR gASHES ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-999-5330 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 100-16~-999-5218 001-100-999-5260 190-183-999-5330 100-164-999-526~ 001-110-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 001-162-999-5263 190-183-999-5330 190-181-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 190-180-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5236 001-100-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 001-162-999-5262 001-163-999-5260 001-170-999-5220 190-183-999-5320 320-199-999-5221 001-120-999-5220 330-199-999-5230 190-180-999-5212 001-110-999-5248 001-163-999-5268 210-166-627-5802 190-181-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 310-162-999-5214 310-164-999-5214 310-180-999-5214 ITEM AMOUNT 1,176.00 192.48 247.14 7.00 80.00 576.00 20.21 36.36 13.99 19.94 128.00 200.00 200.00 45.02 108.74 8.08 53.86 16.00 12.50 16.27 48.07 17.24 52.93 63.09 17.33 150.00 269.91 500.00 6.47 79.20 11.60 2,406.15 111.36 806.69 8.00 16.00 6.00 '3 CHECK AMOUNT 1,176.00' 446.62 80.00 576.00 90.50 128.00 400.00 6 28~.37 150.00 269.91 500.00 85.67 3,335.80 VOUCHr CITY OF TENECULA 05/12, 11:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR XTEN ACCOUNT NUHBER DATE NUNBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 14973 05/11/94 000907 RANCHO CAR gASH CAR WASHES 001-162-999-5263 14973 05/11/94 000907 RANCHO CAR gASH CAR gASHES 001-100-999-5262 1497~ 05/11/94 000907 RANCHO CAR MASH CAR MASHES 310-110-999-5214 14973 05/11/94 000907 RANCHO CAR HASH CAR gASHES 310-16~-999-5214 14973 05/11/94 000907 RANCHO CAR gASH CAR gASHES 310-180-999-5214 14973 05/11/94 000907 RANCHO CAR gASH CAR gASHES 310-162-999-5214 ITEM ANOUNT 10.15 15.36 13.02 46.95 8.00 21.45 CHECK AMOUNT 142.93 14974 05/11/94 000/,26 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL CITY HALL CLEANING GOOD 340-199-999-5212 14974 05/11/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SUPPLIES FOR SENIOR CTR 190-181-999-5212 14974 05/11/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL MAINT SUPPLIES FOR TCSD 190-180-999-5212 14974 05/11/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5212 14974 05/11/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL CLEANING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 186.89 70.90 169.92 29.33 90.96 548.00 14975 05/11/94 RIVERA, PASTOR RIVERA/REFUND 190-183-4982 48.00 48.00 14976 05/11/94 000271 ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST & DESIGN OF NARGARITA RD. 210-165-606-5802 912.63 912,63 14977 05/11/94 000958 ROBERT CARAN PRODUCTION FIREgORKS PRODUCTION 190-183-999-5370 9,000.00 9,000.00 14978 05/11/94 000815 RO~LEY, CATHERINE 80~ CONTRACT CLASS 190-183-999-5330 1,190.40 1,190.40 149~ ;/11/94 001441 SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASU CCPA SALARY SURVEY 001-150-999-5250 250.00 250.00 14980 05/11/94 001443 SHERATON DENVER WEST HO THORNHILL HOTEL 001-161-999-5258 150.86 150.86 14981 05/11/94 000704 14981 05/11/94 000704 14981 05/11/94 000704 14981 05/11/94 000704 14981 05/11/94 000704 14981 05/11/94 000704 14981 05/11/94 000704 14982 05/11/94 '000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 14982 05/11/94 000537 1498 '/11/94 000537 1498~ j/11/94 000537 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL SKS, INC./INLAND OIL SKS, INC./ZNLAND OIL SKS, INC./INLAND OIL SKS, INC./INLAND OIL SKS, INC./INLAND OIL SKS, INC./INLAND OIL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI FUEL/CM 001-110-999-5263 FUEL/TCSD 190-180-999-5263 FUEL/B&S 001-162-999-5263 FUEL/Pg 100-16~-999-5263 FUEL/Pg 100-164-999-5263 FUEL/B&S 001-162-999-5263 FUEL/TCSD 190-180-999-5263 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 4/01-4/30 191-180-999-5319 4/01-4/30 191-180-999-5319 4/01-4/30 191-180-999-5319 2/28-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 3/31-4/30 191-180-999-5319 03/31-04/30/94 191-180-999-5319 40.21 127.08 22.23 412.17 463.33 47.53 90.81 35.7~ 40.81 19.64 22.45 80.65 38.42 42.88 45.44 45.70 44.64 44.96 39.47 38.80 38.55 40.93 33.92 135.96 28.91 1,203.36 VOUCHRE2 ~ 5 05/12/94 11:31 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 14982 14982 14982 14982 14982 14982 14982 14983 14984 14985 14992 14993 14993 14993 14994 14994 14995 14996 14997 14998 14998 14999 15000 15001 15001 15001 15001 15001 15002 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05111/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 05/11/94 C]TY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EO] 000291 000306 000467 001022 000319 000319 000319 000320 000320 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & TEMECULA VALLEY TAE~ THOMPSON PUBLISHING GRO TONARK SPORTS, INC. TONARK SPORTS# INC. TONARK SPORTS, INC. ITEM DESCRIPTION 3/31-4/30 3/31-4/30 3/31-4/30. 3/31-4/30 3/31-4/30 3/31-4/30 3/31-4/30 LOF & NEW BELTS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 80X CONTRACT Cl_~SS PUBLIC PAYROLL OUIDE PLAYERS BENCH, SURFACE FREIGHT TAX TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS ELD-1666-21; 7 POCKET F TCR4NE CENTER STATIONERS TAX 000459 TUHBLE JUNGLE 000321 UBNOSKE, DEBBIE 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 001298 UNIVERSITY EXfENSION 001433 VYLANIS: AKA; ALLNAN, V 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY ~AXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 001435 UEAVER, LISA 80X CONTRACT CLASS REIMB APA CONFERENCE CONFERNECE/MAY 17-19 JS ONE MEEK OF UNIFORMS MlSC. UNIFORM MAINT. ZONING & MANAGEMENT COU PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR BLDG R~INTENANCE SUPPL! BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES BLDG NAINT SUPPLIES SHIPPING CHGS CRO~IN TOUELS PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR ACCOUNT NUMBER 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 310-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5212 190-183-999-5330 001-140-999-5228 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-183-999-5330 001-161-999-5261 001-100-999-5258 100-164-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 001-161-999-5261 190-183-999-5330 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 190-183-999-5330 ITEM AMOUNT 22.87 42.38 29.21 42.57 45.32 29.95 27.07 77.31 32.27 504.00 249.00 520.00 80.65 40.30 58.79 4.56 576.00 617.65 94.00 23.00 21.01 285.00 384. O0 10.72 9.27 44.50 16.00 58.99 100.00 CHECK AMOUNT 1,057.29 77.31 32.27 50~.00 249.00 640.95 576.00 617.65 94.00 44.01 285.00 384.00 139.48 100,00 TOTAL CHECKS 106,252.17 VOUCHr PAGE 2 05/13, 16:24 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP AMOUNT 4,778.30 15,850.66 23,399.35 2,262.00 79,799.47 2,015.00 TOTAL 128,104,78 VOUCHRE2 ' 1 05/13/94 16:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 15031 15031 15031 15031 15032 15033 15033 15033 15034 15034 15035 15036 15036 15036 15036 15036 15036 15036 15036 15036 15036 15037 15037 15037 15038 15039 15039 15039 15039 15039 15039 15040 15040 15041 15041 15041 15041 15042 15042 CHECK DATE 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24194 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 05/24/94 VENDOR NUMBER 001056 001056 001056 001056 001348 001238 0017.)8 001238 000217 000217 001147 001394 001394 001394 001394 001394 001394 001394 001394 001394 001394 000240 000240 000240 000247 001327 001327 001327 001327 001327 001327 001046 001046 000353 000353 000353 000353 001392 001392 EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE HANK NOHLE & ASSOCIATES K.E. PATTERSOR CO. LTD. K.E. PATTERSOR CO. LTD. K.E. PATTERSOR CO. LTD. NARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS MARGAR]TA OFFICIALS ASS MURRIETA, CITY OF NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING PESTMASTER RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDITO RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDITO RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDITO RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDITO SPANCRETE OF CALIFORNIA SPANCRETE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION INSTALL IRRZGATIOR CONT IRRIGATION REPAIR/SPORT LANDSCAPE INPROVENENT/S LANDSCAPE [MPROVENENTS/ APRIL 94 ENG SERVICES LIEFER RD AT NICOLAS RD OVER CONTRACT AMOUNT RETENTION ADULT SOFTBALL GAMES, OFFICIALS SOFTBALL LABOR MARKET ANALYSIS PANTHERNAT]C II 4" COIl TURBO CAT I I I FLOOR DRY POLY BENGAL gET/DRY VAC MATIONALITE DRY TOOL KI PERMAGRIP ASSY g/PLATE TAX CASTEX POMER EAGLE 800 BOBCAT 20 S.S. COUGAR 1700 HS BURNISHE TAX STRIPING REPAIR RIBBON STRIPING RIGHT-OF-gAY gEED CORTR RECYCLED' FENCE MATERIAL TAX CREDIT BILL INCORRECT TAX HEXAGON TABLE FOR SEN]O TAX FEB. LEGAL FEB. LEGAL PARKING CITATION MONIES PARKING CITATION MONIES PARKING CITATIONS PARKING CITATIONS CONCRETE BRIDGE/LIEFER RETENTION ACCOUNT NUMBER lgr~-180-~-5415 1~0-180-~-5212 1~0-180-~-5212 190-180-~-5212 100-164-~-52~8 210-16&-627-5804 210-166-627-580~ 210-2035 190-18~-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 280-1~-~-5264 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5610 190-180-999-5610 190-180-999-5610 190-180-999-5610 100-164-999-5410 100-164-~-5402 100-164-999-5410 100-164-~-5402 190-180-~-5610 190-180-~-5610 190-180-~-5610 190-180-~-5610 190-180-~-5242 190-180-~-5242 001-130-~-5247 001-150-~{~-5248 001-2260 001-2265 001-2260 001-2265 210-166-627-580~ 210-2035 ITEM AMOUNT 2,262.00 290.00 1,160.00 96.00 1,467.50 70,746.08 2,7)0.00- 6,801.61- 475.20 3,880.80 2,015.00 287.00 195.00 360.00 86.80 78.72 78.08 1,398.00 749.00 960.00 240.79 2,786.13 935.00 6,712.03 3,950.00 11,225.00 871.87 20.00' 3.48- 919.32 71.25 488.30 2,080.00 780.00 1,200.00 130.00 100.00 20,650.00 2,065.00- CH~CK AMOUNT 3,808.00 1,467.50 61,214.47 4,356.00 2,015.00 4,433.39 10,433.16 3,950.00 13,063.96 2,5(>8.30 2,210.00 18, )0 TOTAL CHECKS 128,104.78 VOUCH' CITY OF TENECULA 05/05, 16:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 14902 05/05/94 000302 SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. 24105K; KEYBOARD DRAMER 001-140-999-5242 210.12 210.12 14903 05/05/94 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 28.03 28,03 14904 05/05/94 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL FLO~IERS 14904 05/05/94 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL FLOWERS/MEMORIAL 001-162-999-5260 001-120-999-5220 25.27 63.03 88.30 14905 05/05/94 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED RENTAL DAY CAMP 190-183-999-5340 6,912.00 6,912.00 14906 05/05/94 000998 TEMECULA VLLY NATAL LIT CS FUNDING 001-100-999-5267 2,000.00 2,000.00 14907 05/05/94 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 14907 05/05/94 000320 TOUNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190'180'999-5220 14907 05/05/94 000320 TOUNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220 46.81 53.9 22.44 122.48 14908 05/05/94 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR AIRFARE TO CHICAGO/NUNOZ 001-100-999-5258 14908 05/05/94 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELO TR AIRFARE/MAY 11-13/RP 001-100-999-5258 948.00 129.00 1,077'.00 14909 05/05/94 000325 UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 001-2120 14909 05/05/94 000325 UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 100-2120 1490~"' n5/05/94 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 190-2120 149 3/05/94 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 280-2120 78,90 1.00 17.00 .60 97.50 14910 05/05/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE FLOOR MAT RENTAL & CLEA 190-180-999-5250 14910 05/05/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL 100-164-999-5243 14910 05/05/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE MISC. UNIFORM MAINT. 190-180-999-5243 14910 05/05/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE MZSC. UNIFORM MAINT. 190-180-999-5243 14910 05/05/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE FLOOR MATS RENT/CLEANIN 340-199-999-5250 14910 05/05/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE CLEAN MATS 340-199-999-5250 14910 05/05/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE FLOOR MAT RENT & CLEANI 190-180-999-5250 84.25 23.00 18.85 18.85 30.75 30.75 90.99 297.44 14911 05/05/94 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP 001-2080 14911 05/05/94 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 ' DEF CONP 100-2080 14911 05/05/94 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP 190-2080 14911 05/05/94 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP 300-2080 14911 05/05/94 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP 320-2080 14911 05/05/94 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP 340-2080 2,265.03 197.98 156.32 3.46 312.50 50.00 2,985.29 14912 05/05/94 000389 USCM/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 14912 05/05/94 000389 USCM/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 100-2160 14912 05/05/94 000389 USCM/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 88.86 96.00 247.86 432.72 14913 05/05/94 001209 VAULT, THE STORAGE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5250 186.02 186.02 14914 05/05/94 000539 WINNER YAMADA ASSOCIATE REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 210-190-120-5802 32.93 32.93 14915 05/05/94 000342 WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC MAY RENT 14915 05/05/94 000342 ~/NDSOR PARTNERS - RANC CREDIT/REPAIRS 340-199-999-5234 340-199-999-5212 29,780.55 349.02- 29,431.53 149' ;/05/94 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI METER USAGE 330-199-999-5239 859.10 1491b u5/05/94 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI LEASE AGREEMENT/MAY 330-199-999-5239 2,969.95 3,829.05 ITEM NO. 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO.' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, DirectOr of Public Works/City Engineer May 24, 1994 Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135 (located east of Margarita Road and south of Santiago Road) PREPARED BY: r'~Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development ~'~Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract No. 24135 was originally submitted to Riverside County Planning Department on January 3, 1989. The Tentative Vesting Tract Map was approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 23, 1989. Tentative Tract No. 24135 was granted an extension of time by the "Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of TemecUla, Bedford Development Company, and Mesa Homes (Park Fees)" recorded February 18, 1993 (attached). The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval. Final Vesting Tract No. 24135 contains 59 residential lots and 4 open space lots within 12.83 gross acres. The tract is located east of Margarita Road and south of Santiago Road. This tract is part of the Meadows Specific Plan (County approved SP No. 219) and County of Riverside Development Agreement No. 4. The applicant is Kemper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC), Inc. The following fees have been paid for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135: Signal Mitigation Fee Fire Mitigation Fee Stephen's K-Rat Fee 8,850.00 23,600.00 16,900.00 -1 - r:\agdrpt\94~0524\24135.agn skg The following fees have been deferred for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135: Public Facilities Fee Flood Control Fee (ADP) Due prior to Building Permit Exempt per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 (attached) The parkland dedication requirement (Quimby) has been satisfied pursuant to the "Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, KRDC, Inc. (formerly Bedford Development Company), and Mesa Homes (Park Fees)", which was approved by City Council on December 8; 1992. Among other things, this Development Agreement provides for the granting of several improved parks to the City. The initial Paloma Del Sol City Park has been completed and was accepted by the City on January 25, 1994. The following bonds have been posted for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135: Faithful Labor & Subdivision Performance Material Monument Street and Drainage $273,000 $136,500 Water $76,000 $38,000 Sewer $72,500 $36,500 Survey Monuments $18,000 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.. Development Fee Checklist Location Map Copy of Sht 3, Tract Map 24135 Conditions of Approval Fees and Securities Report RCFCD letter dated September 17, 1993 Copy of Restatement and Amendment to Dev. Agree. No. 4 -2- r:\agdrpt\94\0524\24135.agn skg CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Vesting Tract MaD No. 24135 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees) Traffic Signal Mitigation Public Facility Condition of AoDroval Condition No. 26b Due Prior to Grading Permit See Staff Report See Road Department Letter Dated .4/12/89, Item 22 Pursuant to Development Agreement Fire Mitigation Flood Control (ADP) See Fire Department Letter Dated 2/24/89 Exempt per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 -3- r:~agdrpt~94\0524\24135.agn skg TRACT 24 135 ,SITE, VICINITY M,4P NOT TO SC~ L 2E L~L[JJ RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNENT SUBDIVISZON CONDZTIONS OF APPROVAL VESTZNG TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135 AMENDED NO. I STANDARD CONDITIONS The su~dtvtder shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencie pal boards or legislative body ~c~~Amended24 No 1 which action concerning Vesting Tentative Tract . is brought about within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Nap Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Nap Act and Ordinance 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. · If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of a comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as may be additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. TENTATIVE TRACT I10. 24135, Conall U ons of Approval Page 2 7. A grading pemit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained road right of way. 8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recoraation of the final map. 9. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlin)d in the Riverside County Road Department 's letter dated 4-12-89 a copy of which is attached. (~mended - Plannin~ Commission - /~oril 12, 1989) 10. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. 11. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue i n force unti 1 the 9overni ng body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commissioner. 12. Easements, when requ i red for roadway slopes, drainage faci 1 i ties, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Su r vey o r. 13. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County health Department's letter dated 2-27-89 a copy of which is attached. 14. The subdi vi der shal 1 'comply with the fl odd control recommenaations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 3-27-89 a copy of which i s attached. If the 1 and di vi si on 1 i es wi thin an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner. 15. The subdivider shall comply ~th the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Harshal's letter dated 2-24-89, a copy of which i s attached. 16. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area Improvement phasing, t f appl i cabl e, shal 1 be subject to P1 anning Department approval. Any proposed phastng shal 1 provtoe for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially confore to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 24135. Aed. tl Condtttes of Approval Page 3 17. The subdivider and all successors in interest shall comply with the provisions of Development Agreement No. 4 and Specific Plan No. 219. 18. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: a} All lots shall have a minimmn size of 5,000 square feet. b) Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and non-through lots. c) Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Specific Plan zone. d) Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. e} Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas, located in recreation areas shall be located away and visually screened from surrounding areas with the use of block walls and landscaping. (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, lgBg) f) Bike racks and bike lockers in sufficient quantity shall be provided in convenient locations to facilitate bike access to ~ke ~e~ee~ aPea recreation areas. (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, lgB9} 19. Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be satisfied: a. Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met: County Fire Department County Flood Control County Health Department County Parks Department 20. A property owners' association with the unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs shall be' established and continuously maintained. The associbtion shall have the right to lien the property of the owners who default in the payment of their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any encumbrance other than a first deed of trust provided such deed of trust is made in good faith and for value and is of record prior to the lien of the association. TENTAT/VE TRACT N0. 24135,/bed. Conditions of Approval Page 4 PFCeP le FesepdaS&ee ef the f&ea; neh the subdie;dew shall eenvey te the Geenay fee s44np;e SiS;e? So e~; emee oF eemmen open spice aPeass fpee and e;eaP efall 4tense 4~Mes3 asSessmoRSe leases ~PeseFded and enPeeeFded~ end easemanSes eKeape Obese easemanes whisk 4n She se;e d&sePeSten of eke Geenay e~e aeeepSahle, As sendiStorts pwesedent {e {he fe~evSng deeMmeets ~e ~ke P4anntng OepaFSmenS feF Pevtew~ wh~eh deeMmeets sha;~ be seb~ee( Se eke eppweveT of She~ depiwSmenS and She Offtee of She Geenay GewMse~+ t~ A dee~ePaS~en of sevenaRes, eaRdiStorts and FeeSFisSions4 and A aNnpOe deserteRS seRveVieS StS~e So She peeehaseP ef an 4nd~v(dea; ;el eF ee~t whteh pFevtdes ShaS She deelawat~eR ef sevenanise eend~t4ens and Pestw~eS~ens ~s teseppewated SkePe~R by Fetegeese, wev4ew sha;~ ~a~ pwevide few a Seen of 69 yeses, ~b~ pwevide feF the eaek ~nd~v~dea; ;e~ ew unit and ~e~ eent~n She feb;owing pwev~s4ens yewharem+ The pvepeFty ewee~s~ association estab;~shed hevetn sha;~, ~f be aettvatedT by tneerpePaS~en eP ethePw~seT at She PeqeesS ef She Geeely ef RiveFsides end {he ~FepeFty eWReFSZ assesSeS(on shall eneend~tiena;~y assep& fwem She Geeely e; R~vePs4det open She Geenty~s demandT ~4S~e ~e a~ e~ any paPS of ~ke zeemmen a~ea!, me~e Pipt~se;aP~y deseP4bed as ~eSs A ShFeefh U en ¥est4n9 Tpaet Nap ;4taS Amended Net tv The dealsten ~e peqelFe activation e~ ~ke pFepepSy sweeps~ essee~aSten and She desistart Se Peqelpe Shot She assesleSion eneend~S~ena~ly seeeFt ~tS~e ~e ~he Aeee~en a~az sha~ be aS She se;e dtseFeSten ef the GeMnay ef R4vePside~ tn {he event {has the seamen aPeaT eF any peF& {kegeel, 4s eaRrayed e~n sash ~emenen sFeaAs sha~; liBRage and eenttnwees~y Ietnta~n seek She FigkS 4e assess ~he eweeFe ef sash 4edtvSduel let eF unit fop the PeasenabTe ees, e~lnl4RSotntn9 seek zeeegnen aPeazw and sha~; have She PitcheRS efa mateSsnaRes assessdeaRS, AR assessmen~ ~tens ease eeeeSedT 6ha;~ be pPteF {e el; eSkeF ;tens Feeewded sebseqeent to Metlee e~ essessmen~ oF eSheF deeMmeRe oPeoS~R9 She assessment TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 24135, AIM. tl Conditions of Approval Page 5 21. ;his Deela~atien sha;; net be {eeninated~ ~sebstantia~;y~ amended eF peepsPry deanneNed theeniece absent ~ke pwieF wpiiten sensen& of ~he P~anRin9 DiFeeteF FF the Geeely 'el RiveFside oF ~ke Geen~y~s seseessew-tn-intewest, A peepused amendment sha;; be sensidewed zsubstantia;z 4~ 41' a~ests {he eNten~ usage eFnein~enanse e~ ~he tnee~pewa~ienT the By;swaT ew the peepsPry ewnew9~ assesinkieR Ru~es and ska~ be weeeFded aS the same ~ime ~ka& ~ke ~ina~ nap is weeeFded? (Deleted - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Office of the County Counsel: 1} A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and 2) A sample document conveying title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, {b) provide for the establishment of a property owners'. association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit, (c) provide for ownership of the common area by either the property owners' association or the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common and {d) contain the following provisions verbatim: "Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provision shall apply: t n ~re particularly described as lots A through V on Vesting mract Map No. 24135 Amended No. i attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common area', or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining the 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. tl Condfttes of Approval Page 6 property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien. This Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Planning Oirector of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area'. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules and regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control." Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final map is recorded. {Added - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989} 22. The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping con d i ti o ns: 1) Prior to recordation of the final map the developer shall file an application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a parkway maintenance district for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24135 Amended No. 1 in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance district. 2) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible fomat suitable for permanent filing with the County Road Department. s) The developer shall post a landscape performance bend which shall be released concurrentlywith the release of subdivision perfomance bonds, guaranteelng the vtabiltty of all landscaping which wtll be Installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by the district. 4) The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees, shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over by the district. 5) The developer shall comply with the standards and exhibits in Specific Plan No. 219. TENTATIVE TRACT RO. 24135, Aid. Conditions of Approval Page 7 23. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and Irrigation systems unttl such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parttes as approved by the Planntng DIrector. 24. Street 11ghts shall be provided within the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following: 1) Concurrently with the ftllng of subdivision Improvement plans with the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer and then from the appropriate utility purveyor. 2) Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an application with LAFCO for the formation of a street lighting district, or annexation to an existing lighting district, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. 3) Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall secure conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. 4) All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. 25. PriOr to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. A. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: 'County Slope Stability Report No. 89 was prepared for this property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of concern in the report are as follows: slope stability.' 26. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERNITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: TEXTATTVE TRACT NO. 24135, And. I1 Conditions of Approval Page 8 aT Pwie~ 4o ~ke 4ssuan6e ef g~ad~ng pe~m~s~ 4ke app~ean~ ska~ ebn~n e~eaPanee fwom ~ke U,G, F~sk and H~d~tfe Selvage, we~a~ng &e ~he eK&stenee ef the StepheRsz KaRgawee Rat sere, (Deleted - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance· Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conferration Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 633, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution· Prior to the issuance of g~adiRg building parmits detailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989} 1. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. 2. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth berming, ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amenities where appropriate as approved by the Planning Department. 5. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. 0 Where street trees cannot be interior streets and project right-of-way, they shall be right-of-way. planted within right-of-my of parkways due to insufficient road planted outside of the road 7. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. tl Condtttoes of Approval Page 9 de All extsttng spedmen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the subject property shall be shown on the project's grading plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained. 9, All trees shall be minimum double staked, growing trees shall be steel staked, Weaker and/or slow 10, .The plans shall conform to those shown tn Spectftc Plan No, 2Z9, Any oak trees removed with four (4) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be replaced on a ten (10) to one (1} basis as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans· The following tree preservation guidelines shall the projects approved grading, building and appropriate: be incorporated in landscaping plans as Every effort shall be made to prevent encroachment of structures, grading or trenching within the dripline or twenty-five (25} feet of the trunk of any trees, whichever is greater. If encroachment within the dripline is unavoidable, no more than one third of the root area shall be disturbed, graded or covered with impervious materials. The root area is considered to extend beyond the dripline a distance equal to one half the radius. Building, grading or improvements shall not occur within ten {10} feet of any tree trunk. Retaining walls Shall be constructed where necessary to preserve natural grade at least one-half the distance between the trunk and the dripline. Walls shall be designed with a post or caisson footing rather than a continuous footing to minimize root damage. Alteration of natural drainage shall be avoided to the greatest extent possible. Runoff channelled near trees shall not substantially change normal soil moisture characteristics on a seasonal basis. Runoff shall not be directed towards the base of trees so that the base of the trees rematn tn wet soil for an extended period, Where natural topography has been altered, drainage away from trunks shall be provided where necessary to ensure that water will not stand at the crown· TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135,/kid. I1 Conditions of Approval Page 10 Sedtmentatton and stltatton in the drainage ways shall be controlled where necessary to avoid filling around the base of the trees. Land uses that would cause excessive soil compaction within the dripline of trees shall be avoided. If the areas are planned for recreation, provide trails to restrict compaction to a small area. ~leavy use under trees shall be avoided unless measures to minimize compactton are undertaken. 10. Landscaping or irrigation shall not be installed within ten (10) feet of any trees. All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they .cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. All approved grading and building plans shall reflect the utilization of post and beam foundations or the appropriate combination of split level pads and post and beam foundations when development is proposed on natural slopes of fifteen percent or greater measured over a horizontal distance of thirty (30) feet. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: 1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion sedimentation during and after the grading process. and 2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through Narch 3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations 4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase Driveways shall be designed so as not to exceed a fifteen {15) percent grade. Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, AIM, tl Conditions of Approval Page 11 an appropriate combination of a spectal terracing (benchtng) plan, Increased slope ratio (t.e., 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planttrig combtried with Irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade. All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural .terrain .and exceeding ten (10)' feet in verttcal height shall be contour-graded incorporating the following grading techniques: 1) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain, 2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain. 3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding. 4) Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous, undulating fashion. Natural features such as water courses, specimen trees and significant rock outcrops shall be protected in the siting of individual building pads on final grading plans. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged· When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redtrect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERNITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1) The project shall comply with the requirements of .Development Agreement No. 4. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135,-AIM. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 12 8 · 2) 3) 4) S) 6) Prtor to the submittal of butldtng plans to the Department of Building and Safety an acoustical study shall be perfomed by an acoustical engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be applted to Individual dwelltrig untts within the subdivision to reduce ambient tntertor notse levels to 45 Ldn. PrtGr to the tssuance of bulldtng pemtts, composite landscaping and Irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planntng Department approval. The plans shall address al1 areas and as cts of the tract requiring landscaping and trrtqatton to be Installed but not 11mited tncludtng, to, parkway planttng,'street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard landscaping per the requirements of Specific Plan No. 2Z9. All dwellings to be constructed designed and constructed with fire approved by the County Ftre Marshal. within thts subdivision shall be retardant (Class B) roofs as Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from view of surrounding property. 7) Building separation between all buildings excluding fireplaces shall not be less than ten (10) feet. 8) All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet. 9) All' front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic irrigation. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1) Wall and/or fence locations and materials shall conform to the approved wall and fence treatment plan in Specific Plan No. 219. 2) 3) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by a Planning Department field inspection. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, Red. #1 Coadfttoes of Approval Page 13 4) Not ~lthstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acousttca] study ts requtred for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of requfred walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where app]tcab]e. 5) Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and Specific Plan No. 219,. 6) Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision tn accordance with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Specific Plan No. 219 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the subdivider shall prepare and submit a wrttten report to the Planning Director of the County of Riverside demonstrating compliance ~th those conditions of approval and mitigation measures of this map and E.A. No. 33434 which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Planning Director may require Inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. (Added - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) CO:cj:gs OFFICE OF lOAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY,SUI~VEYOI~ Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon ~treet Riverside, CA 92501 April 12, 1989 Marel~-%r-1989 (O~I~TY AI)NI~ISTRATIVE e4AIUNG ~ P O BOX iO~:) (714t Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: TR 24135 - Amend #1 Schedule A - Team SP - SMD#9 *As Amended at P.C. 4-12-89 With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative m' correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easement.~ traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Commissioner's Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i,e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/ or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows= 'Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as approved by the Road Department. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply· Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by.the Road Department. TR 2~1~5 - Amend I~+r-)~ April 12, 1989 ~2 lOmm Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department. Street "M" shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 100, (84'/108' as approved by th~ Road Commissioner). Streets "B", ,p,, "L" (north of Street "N'), and Street *'E" (at Pio Pico Road) shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 104, Section A. (50'/70' with entry median as approved by the Road Commissioner). The remaining interior streets shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (40'/60') Margarita Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving~ reconstruction~ or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 55 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 100. Street "A" shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of.way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 103, Section A. (24'/33', as approved by' the Road Commisioner) Pio Pico Road shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/33') Corner cutbacks in conformante with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication· Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for main- tenance by County. TR 24135 - Amend ~1 Mm~-(h-4989 April 12, 1989 Page 3 4. 19. 0e 22. 23. Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and off-set cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throughout the landdivision. Aspbaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. The landdivider will provide left turn Road and Street "A" at all interior approved by the Road Department. lanes on Pio Pico intersections as The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho California Water District prior to the recordation of the final map. The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance with County Standard #114 of Ordinance 461. All centerline intersections shall be at 90° with a minimunv '"','5'd "" , f, ,',~, ~ / Concrete s~dewalks shall be constructed throughout =he landdivision in accordance wi=h County S~andard No, 400 and 401 {curb sidewalk), The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be 35 feet. All driveways-shallconform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. A minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be constructed between driveways. The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face of curb. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, a written agreement may be entered into with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordiaance 461, Standard 817. TR 24~5 - Amend ll '_~.~larcJ~-~,-~8i~ April 12, 1989 Pa~u~_ 4 27. 28. 29. 30. Lot access shall be restricted on Hargarita Road, Street "M". Plo Ptco Road, and Street "A" and so noted on the final map. Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of s16pe, a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road Commissioner. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with Specific Plan No. 219. Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAPCO for annexation into or creation of a "Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with Governmental Code Section 56000. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads constructed or improved within the subdivision. The county Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the subdivision is within an existing assessment district. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or treat.ion of a County Service Area in accordance with .Governmental Code Section 25210.1. All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the street improvement plans. A striping plan is required for Margarita Road, Pio Pico Road, Street "M" and Street "A". The removal of the existing striping shall be the responsibility of applicant. 'Traffic signing and striping shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs borne by the applicant. Should this' project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for.their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit. district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. TR 24135 - Amend #1 -Ikreb-i,-&iig April 12, 1989 Page 5 The ~ollowlng conditions ~rom Specific' Plan No. 219 - Vail Meadows shall also apply: All road improvements, unless othervise noted, shall be constructed to ultirate County Standards in accordance with Ordinance No. 460 and 461 as a requirement of the implementing subdivisions for the Specific Plan, subject to approval by the Road Commissioner. The proposed "Gateway Road' is approved, in concept, subject to the submittal and ~eview o~ design details. Any .landscaping within public road rights of way will require approval by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing maintenance through the establishment of a landscape maintenance district or similar mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. The Rancho Villages Assessment is an integral component of the planning for this area· Prior to the recordation of tract maps within this specific plan or any other project located within the assessment district, the final actions necessary for formation of the district must be completed. Should the district fail, the project proponent shall, prior to the recordation of any tract maps within the specific plan boundaries, provide for road improvements in accordance with Table XV-Implementation Schedule for On- Site Roadway Improvements and Table XVI-Implementation Schedule for Off-Site Rpadway Improvements, as attached. In response to the concerns voiced by Caltrans relative to cumulative impacts indicating the need to implement demand management strategies and/or provide-for the development of additional highway corridors, the project proponent has agreed to fund such a study to be conducted under the direction of the Road Department as prescribed by Caltrans. The study is currently in progress. Very truly yours, Elmer Baumgarten Subdivision Engtneer ' EB:Jw ., , - o, ~_'~:,i :3 ~'~ 'd 3:3 3:3 a :3 D ~ :3':3.. :3' D'9 ') -~ 'e · County of Riverside TO: FROM: RE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: February · '~ HEALTH SPECIALIST IV TRACT NAP 24135, Amended No. I 27, 1989 Envlr0nmenCal BealCh Servlces has revlewed Amended No. 1 daced February 23,198~Our currenC c~-.-.enCs vtll remain as scared in our leCter dated January 11, 1989. SM:tac ""~"FEB Z8 1989 *'~ GEN. PO&M 4, (1by. 8/87) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT January 11, 1989 of HEALTH RIVERSIDE COU~I"/PLLNNING DEPT. 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92502 ATTN: Chrts Ormsby RE: TRACT Di~P 24135: Parcels 8 and 9 of Parcel Nap 23432 (325 Lots) eeexLl'N lOiS RAMSET STREET BANNING. CA 12220 Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has revieved Tentative Nap No. 24135 and recommends that: I~YTNE. CA 11225 1~40 MARGUERITA RIVERSIDE. CA 12~04 1.0S SOUTH MNA VISTA CORONA, CA 11?90 II0 NORTH ITATE NEM~'T. CA 92343 IlllO IND;O. CA el;Q1 L&I! Itemell 10115 FRASER DR. LA"rE~.C,-A. Illl0 la, tl Ilqlllll I~'e,S TN4~JITZ,ekC4&,IAli lelllll f37MORTH*'T~I'T'~T IIIVERSID(. CA. IllllOill IIIVER~|DE., r,,A lie'01 A rarer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the vater company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the rarer system shall be submitted in triplicate, vtth a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along vith the original dravtng to the County Surveyor. The prints shall shov the internal pipe diemeter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and Joint specifications, and the stz~ of the main at the Junction of the nev system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all" respects vtth Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, ~hen applicable. The plans 'shall be signed by a registered engineer and vater company rlth the follrding certification: 'I certify that the design of the rarer system in Tract Nap 24135 is in accordance vith the vat.er system expansion plans of the Elminore Valley Municipal Mater District and that the rarer service, storage and distribution system will be adequate to provide rarer service-to such tract. This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it rill supply rarer to such tract at any specific quantities,. flora or pressures for flre protection or any other purpose". This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the rarer company. The plans must be submitted to the County Surveyor's Office to revird at least rdo reeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map. leeee ~e: RtvRrslde County Planning Dept. Page Two ATTN: Chrts Ormsby January 11, 1989 This Depar~nent has a statement from the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand, providing satisfactory financial arrangenears are completed.with the subdivider. It viii be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This DeparUment has a statement from the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District agreeing to alloy the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the se~ers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor and the Health Depart~nent. Permanent prints of the plans of the se~er system shall be submitted in triplicate, along ~ith the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and Joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the Junction of the ne~ system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sever district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Tract ~ap 24135 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed tract". The plans must be submitted to the County Surveyor's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to recordation of the final map. Sincerely, ~~~rian Environmen~al Health Services 4&209 O=~ SteeL Sue, 405 ~d~, CA 9220 ! (619) ~42~886 IUVI/SIDT..COUNTY fiRE DEPARTMENT IN ~TION WTi14 THE CAUFORMA DEPARIMENT OF FOI~STRY 2-24-89 4080 Lemoa SUeet, S~te 11L Rhenk~ CA 92501 ~i4) ?s?~606 TO: ATTN: KE: PLANNING DEPARTNENT CHRIS ORMSBY TRACT 24135- &MENDED With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard 'fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2½") located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "l certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. RAZARDOUS FIRE AREA The land division is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" of Liverside County as shown on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Any building constructed on lots created by this land division shall comply with the special construction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance 546. All road medians to be set back 30 feet from curb line at all intersections- Subject: Tract Page 2 All buildings shall be cons=ructed wi=h fire retardan= roofing material as described in Sec=ion 3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any rood shingles or shakes shall have a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the Fire Depar~men~ prior to ins=allation. MITIGATION Prior to ~he recorda~ion of the final map, the developer shall deposit rich the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 pit lot/unit as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose ~o defer the time of payment, h~/she may enter into a writcen agreement with the County deferring said payment to ~he time of issuance of the firs~ building permit. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred ~o the Planning and Engineering s~aff. RAYNOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Depar=ment Planner By Kur= Nantwell, Fire Safety Specialist alna KENNETH L. EDWARDI C:NII;F INOINIIR till MAIIrKrr ITIIEIL"r P, O. BOX !013 TI,I,EPNO, NE (7 1 dl) 7& il RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT IIIVIIIIIDI', CAL. IleORNIA IllOl March 27, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention= Specific Plan Section Chris Ormsby Ladies and Gentlemen= Re: Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No. 1 This is a proposal to divide about 83 acres in the Rancho Cal- ifornia area. The site is to the north of Highway 79 between Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road. This project is a part of Specific Plan 219, Vail Meadows. The area consists of well defined ridges and natural watercourses which traverse this property. Local offsite flows are tributary to the site's northeast and southeast boundaries. A storm drain is proposed along Pio Pico Road to collect the flows from the southeast. This storm drain would be connected to an existing 120-inch diameter storm drain across the school site to the southeast as shown on the Exhibit B. Another storm drain is pro- posed across the middle of this property. This storm drain would discharge the flows into two existing 42-inch diameter culverts under Margarita Road as shown on the tentative map. Onsite flows and other local offsite flows would be conveyed with streets and the above two storm drains. Following are the District's recommendations: The 100 year offsite tributary flows should be collected and safely conveyed through the site to an adequate outlet. e Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right of way should be contained w~thin drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating, 'Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions'. Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the affected property owners. The documents should be recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to recordation of the final map. Riverside County Planning Depar~nent Re= Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No. i -2- March 27, 1989 4. All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street or an adequate outlet. The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained within the street right of way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities should be installed. Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows· Additional emergency escape should alsobe provided· The property's street and lot'grading should be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a drainage easement should be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or di- verted storm flows· A copy of the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the District for review prior to the recordation of the final map. Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition of debris onto downstream properties or drainage facilities. Development of this property should be coordinated with the development of adjacent properties to ensure that watercourses remain.unobstructed and stormwaters are not diverted from one watershed to another. This may require the construction of temporary drainage facilities or offsite construction and grading· 0e A portion of the proposed project is in a floodplain and my affect swatere of the United States", "wetlands" or 'Jurisdictional streambeds", therefore, in accordance with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts 59 through 73) and County Ordinance No. 458: A coFy of appropriate correspondence and necessary permits from those government agencies from which approval is required by Federal or State law (such as Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Department of Fish and Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to the District prior to the final District approval of the project· Riverside County Planning Department Re= Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No, i -3- March 27, 1989 Major flood control facilities are being proposed. These should be designed and constructed to District standards including those related to alignment and access to both inlets and outlets,. The applicant should consult the District early in the design process regarding materials, hydraulic design and transfer of rights of way, All flood control facilities should be constructed to District standards, And all facilities that the District will assume for maintenance will require the payment of a one time maintenance charge equal to the 'present worth' of maintenance costs from the time of acceptance through 1998. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the District via the Road Department for review and approval prior to recorda~ion of the final map, Grading plans should be approved prior to issuance of grading permits. Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Chiang of this office at' 714/787-2333. Very truly yours, CCz Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates KENNETH L. EDWARDS hi~/. ,Eng~ine~r ~. RCzpln January 18,. 1989 q)epa l:me.e c . .l cfi"g a.a a6et:.U, Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 Riverside County Planning ~epartment Attentio~z Ron Goldman County Administrative Center' 4080 Lemon Street- Riverside, CA 92501 Vesting Tract 24135 Ladies and Gentlemenz The Land Use Division ~f the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions= Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off- site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348. Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B, per Ordinance 655. Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side'yard setback. Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum 5' side yard setback. Very truly yours, Thomas H. Ingram, DirectOr DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY Land Use ' Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020 STATE OF CAUr-ORNIA---IU$1NES$, TRANSIN~I'ATION AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT I, P.O. IOX 231 SAN IERNARDINO, CA IOD (714) 3134409 January 3, 1989 JAN 6 GEORGE IX. UKME.IIAN, Development Review 08-Riv-79-17.376 Your Reference: VT 24135 Planning Department Attention Mr. Chris Ormsby County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Mr. Ormsby: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Vesting Tract 24135 located adjacent to Margarita Road and north of Pio Pico Road in Rancho California. Please refer to the attached Development Review Form which documents Gaitfans' requirements for this project. Conformante with these conditions is required for issuance of an Encroachment Permit. If any work is necessary within the state highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. If additional information 18 desired, please call Mr. Thomas J. Nevllle at (714) 383-q384- Very truly yours, ~~N'.LEWANDOWSKI District Permits Engineer Art. (Your Reference) -- -- Plan Checker ME WOULD LIKE TO NOTE: CAI,.TRA]~ DEVELOPNENT REVZE¥ FORt4 k" -;-~" · ': * ' **¥: "~.: ': .. 'r , -,, , C** ,-~.,. -'-- _o ])ate ~lV- '79-17'S7/, (Co Rte - I~en plans are-submitted, please conform to the requirements of the attached wHandout". This will expedite the review. process and time required for Plan Check. Althot~h the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal do not appear to have a significant effect on the state highway systen, consideration must be given to the cmulative effect of continued developnent in this area. Any measures necessar{ to mitigate the ctlnulattve impact of traffic and drainage shall be provided prior to or with developnent of the area that necessitates them. b/' It appears that the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal could have a significant effect on the state highway systen of the area. Any measures necesszry to mitigate the traffic and drainage impacts shall be included ~ith the development. This portion of state highway is included in the California Master Plan of State Highways Eligible for Official ~eenic Highway Designation, and in the future your agency my wish to have this route officially designated as a state scenic high,,~y. This portion of state highway has been officially designated as a state scenic highway, and developnent in this corridor should be compatible with the scenic highway concept. / It is recognized that there is considerable public concern about noise levels adjacent to heavily %~veled highways. Land development, in order to be c~npatible with this concern, my require special noise attenuation measures. Development of property should include any necessary noise attenuation. WE REQUEST THAT T~E ITEMS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN 'Tr~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: Normal right of way dedication to provide __ half-width on the state highway. Normal street improvenents to provide half-width on the state hi~h~y. Curb and gutter, State Standard__ along the state highway. Parking shall be prohibited along the state high~y by painting the curb red and/or by the proper placement of "no parking" .elgns. radius curb returns be provided at intersections with the state high~y. i'~ndard wheelchair reap must be provided in t.he returns. A positive vehicular barrier along the property frontage shall be provided to limit physical access to the state highway, Vehicular access shall not be developed directly to the state highway. Vehicular ~ to the state highly shall be provided by existing public road connections. Vehicular access to the state .~..y shall be provided by __ standard __ driveways. "- Vehicular access shall not. be provided within __ of the intersection at Vehicular .access to the state highmy shall be provided by a road-type co.~nection. Form 8-PD19 (Rev. 5/87) -'.Continued on reverse) Date: January 3,198~ ~- 79-,7.~7G (Co-Rte-PM) (Your Reference) ADDITIONAL=OMMENTS: Due ~o magnltude of this proposal and the construction exp!osLon (residential, commercial), the contract should contrlbu=e to all Hl~hway improvements necessary to ma~ntaln the exls~ing trsff2c flc~c patterns. '- addition ~% appears %haz =h~s development ls v~zhLn Ranchc V~!lage Assessmen~ Dls. zrlct and ~herefore reccmmenl th~ owner psrt~c~pa~e in the assessmen%s for %he Vehicular access connections shall be pavew~ at least within the state hXghway Y'i6ht of wuy. Access points to the state highway shall be developed in a manner that will provide sight distance for __ mph along the state highway. Landscaping along the state highway shall be low and forgiving in nature. A left-turn lane, ineludinE any necessary widening, shall be provided on the state highway at L/Consideration shall be given to the provision, or future provision, of signalization and lighting of t.he intersection of and the state highway. A traffic study indieatinE on- and off-site flow patterns and volu=nes, probable impacts, and proposed mitigation measures shall be prepared. Adequate'off-street .parking, w~ieh does not reqdire backing onto the state highway, shall be provided. Parking lot shall be developed in a manner that will net cause any vehicular mov~ent conflicts, including parkin~ stall entrance and exit, within of the entrance from the state hi~h~ray. Handicap parkinE shall not be developed in the busy driveway entrance area. Care shall be taken when developinE this property to preserve and perpetuate the existing drainage pattern of the state highway. Particular consideration should be given to cumulative increased storm runoff to insure that a highway drainaBe ~/~Anoblem is not created. y necessary noise ~.t~tenuation shall be provided as part of the development of this property. Please refer to attachec additional comments. WE REQUEST: A copy of any conditions of approval or revised approval. v/' A copy of any doetm~ents providing additional state highway right of way upon recordation of the map. WE REQUEST It{E OP~RllJN~Y TO RE1/IEW DURING It{E APPROV~,L PROCEfkS: __ . Any proposals to further develop this property. A copy of the traffic or enviromental study, //' A check print of the Parcel or .Tract Hap, A~ A cheek print of the Plans. for any. improvements within the state highway right of way, " j//A check print of the Grading and Drainage Plans for this property when available, Ea~! ern ~/[u nie i pal 'W' t er Di t;-ict ~ae. el T~ Mrs~,.. Riverside, Ca 92501 SUBJECT: t/F'IZA4-T 2q.k%~- EA ~gkt~- ('~P (~t) - Lbc,, ' ]?_'~/,!~f The District is responding to your request for comments on the subject project relative to water and/or sewer service. The ttems checked below apply to this project review. The subject project: '/'/Is not within EMWD's: water service area sewer service area /Will be required to construct/provide the following facilities if to be served by EMWD: I !~eWer Service Afiy and all necessary regionally sized onsite and offsite gravity sewers and appurtenant works that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers, treatment, and,effluent disposal must be mat. Only wastes acceptable to EMWD regulations.will be allowed. , EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Planning Department 2045 S. San Jacinto Street ·Posc Office B, mx R.~00 · San Jacinto. California 92.~8)-1500 · Telephone (.7)4) 925-7676 0 January 17, 1989 Bosra of Directors: Riehm'd D. 8tefYeX President ,James A. Derby Sr. Vice President Ralph Daily Doug Kulberg Jon A. Lundin jeffrey L. Minitier T. C. Rowe Officers: Bran T. Mitts General Manager phillip L Forbes D~rector of Firsance- Treasurer Thomas IL McAliester Director of Operetions & Msintenance Doris V. Baker D~tzict Secretmy McCormick & Kidruth Legs1 Counsel Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor Riverside, California 92501-3657 Subject: Water Availability Reference: Vesting Tract 24135 Gentlemen: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have anyquestions, please contact Senga Doherty at (714) 676-4101. Very truly yours, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Bob Lemons, P,E. Acting Director of Engineering F012/dptlSf RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT 28061 DIAZ ROAD · POST OFFICE BOX 174 · TEMECULA, CA 92390-0174 · (714) 676-4101 · FAX (714) 676-0615 UNITED STATES POST OFFICE DATE: OUR REF: SUBJECT: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO: · · RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4080 LEMON ST., 9th FLOOR RIVER. SIDE, CA 92501 FUTURE MODE OF DELIVERY: CENTRALIZED CONTACT WITH THE U. S. POSTAL SERVICE IS REQUIRED BY DEVELOPER/BUILDER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION FOR DELIVERY TYPE AND LOCATIONS. DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR Southern ¢mllfornla Edison' Company P. O. BOx 410 100 LONG lEACH IC)UI, EVARD LONG lEACH. CALJIrOIINIA 00801 Riverside County Road Department Y. O. Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Attention: Subdivision Section SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24135 TELZPt,IONE January 20, 1989 Please be advised that the division of the property shown on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24135 will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s) held by Southern California Edison Company within the boundaries of said vesting tentative tract map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights. title and inte[est in and to said easement(s). nor should this letter be construed as a waive~ of any of the p~ovisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of any costs for relocation of affected facilities. In the event that the development requires relocation of facil- ities, if any, on the subject property by right of easement or otherwise. the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost of such relocation and provide Edison with suitable replacement Eights. Such costs and replacement rights are required prior to the performance of the teloration. If additional information is required in connection vith the above aenttoned subject, please call Dennis C. Bazant at (213) 491-2644. DCB/bjv 16160-24)rPC Very truly yours, R. P. ROSSEL RELOCAT I ON ON ec: Robert Rein. Milljam Frost & A~sociates RiVER: iDE COUrlCY PLAnninG DEPARClTI 'IC DATE: December 28, 1988 TO:Assessor Butldtng and Safety Surveyor - Dave Duda Road Department Health - Ralph Luchs Fire Protection Flood Control DIstrict' F(sh & Game U,S, Postal Service - Ruth E,.Davtdson U,S, F~sh & Wtldllfe Services COJ~/SS/~NER WALT ABRAHAN R/VERS/DE COUNTY PARKS EASTERN ]4JNZCZPAL WATER CONPANY RANCHO CALIF WATER CONPANY SO CALIF EDISON SO CALIF GAS CONPANY GENERAL TELEPHONE CAL TRANS t8 ELSZNORE TENECULA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT VESTING TRACT 24135 - (Sp P1) - E.A. 33434 - Bedford Properties - Robert Betn, William Frost & Assoc. - Rancho California Area - First Supervisortal Distr~ct - Adjacent to Nargarita, N. of Pto Ptco Road - SP Zone - 83.5 Acres into 325 lots - Schedule A - No Mafver - Nod 118 - A.P. 923-230-002 Please revtew the case described above, along w~th the attached case map. A Land Division Co~n~ttee meettng has been tentatively scheduled for January23, 1989. tf tt clears, tt w~11 then go to publ(c hearing. Your comments and recoenendations are requested prior to January23, 19~9 tn order that e.may include them tn the staff report for this'particular case. Should you have any questions regarding thts ~ten, please do not hesttate to contact Chrts 0rmsby at 787-1363. Planner COI~ENTS: The Elsinore Unton Htgh School Dtstrtct facilities are overcrowded and our educational programs seriously tmpacted by Increasing student population caused by new residential, co~nercial and industrial construction. Therefore, pursuant to California Government Code Sectton 53080 of AB 2926 and SB 327, thts district levies a fee agatnst 811 new development projects wtthln tts boundaries. DATE: 1/4/89 SIGNATURE PLEASE prtnt name and tttle 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDF, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 Dr. Larry Maw, Superintendent 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 February 9 1989~~ TO: Chris Oresby, Planner, County Planning IRON: 14arc Braver, Assistant Park Planner, County SUBJECT: Tentative Tracts: 24131, 24132, 24134, 24135, 24136, 24137 Vail Heado~s SP 21g/E/R 235 The Riverside County Parks Department appreciates the opportunity to review the above referenced and offers the following co,~ents: Parks and Recreations The Development of the proposed tracts wtll have mtntmal tapact on existing ragtonal park facilities. The County Parks Department also has a county-vide recreation trail system. As Indicated by thts department:s response to S,P, 219/EZR 235, Nay 25, 1988 and the Planntng Department's conditions of approval October 4, 1988, the developer mas to provide recreation tratls along the south side of the Pauba Road right-of-ray and along the north side of the De Portola Road right-of-way. The latter is to cross De Portola Road at the development's roestern most boundary, follov the boundary due south and extt the site tnto prtvate property to the ~est. Tentative tracts 24132 and 24134 ~tll tapact the Pauba Road recreation tratl and tentative tracts 24136 and 24137 ~tll tapact De Portola Road Trat1. The above mentioned tracts make no reference to tratls or trail easements. The Parks Department rill 'require these trat1 locations to be shmen on all tract maps and that they be graded in an acceptable inner. The Parks Department also requests that it be listed as clearance agency for maps and Fading planntngs dealing vtth this pro;lect. Cultural and Historic Resources' _lentatlve 1fact Z4131, Z4132, z4134, 24135: Conditional approval is Fanted for T.T. 24131, 24132, 24134, regard to Cultural and Historic Resources only. mad 24135 vtth Conditions for Approval: Should any prehistoric or htstortc resources be discovered or uncovered durtng the gradtrig process, all ,ork tn that area will cease until the resource ts evaluated by an archaeologist, or historian and mitigation ts determined and approved by the Htstory Dhtston of the Riverside County Parks Department and the Archaeological Research Untt, Untverstt/of California, RIverside. Tentative Tract 24136: Conditional approval ts granted for T.T. 24136. Conditions for Approval: At the time of the alignment of De Porto1· Road the htstortc resource Rtv-3390-H was not known. Th~s site was found as a result of the Htstory Dtvtston's ortgtnal mitigation for conditional approval of the [ZR #219 {Nay 25 1988). Although Rtv-3390-H fs located south and east of T.T.24136, the realignment of De Porto1· Road must be resolved before ftnal approval of this T.T.24136 ts given by the Htstory DIvision. Tentative Tract 24137: Condition·'1 Approval ts granted for T.T.24137. Conditions for Approval: Street "A", ~htch cuts south and east off De Porto1· Road, should not be cut or graded, etc., untfl mitigation by data collection ts completed for Rtv-1728, Rtv-1729 and Rtv-3391-H. The road w111 tmpact all three of these sttes at present. Any ~ork tn T.T.24137 must avoid parcel t6 and Rtv-1728 untt1 all archaeological work ts completed tn that area. The use of heavy equipment anywhere south of De Porto1· Road must be avoided untt1 all archaeological york ts completed and protective measures are taken to ensure the safety and future existence of the cultural and htstortc resources tn that area. Protective measures should Constst of fenctng around Riv-3390-H,. betng sure not to allow fenctng to t act the stte. All Beyable surface htstorlc resources south of De Por~om~a Road should be photographed, recorded and mapped. after ,htch, they Bay be muvedwtthtn the fenced area at Rtv-3390-H. However, the project archaeologist mst dtrect and supervise the Eovment and placeEent of these resources to Rh-3390-H to muke sure thetr placeEent wtll not impact the stte. Although T.T.24137 ts vest of Rtv-33g0-H, the realignrant of De Porto1· Road must be resolved and the above conditions Bet before final approval Is granted to the Htstory DIvision. m/KN/0376S IDIPAIITMINTAL LITTan COUNTY OF RIVERBIDE PLANN/N6 DEPARTNENT January 31, 1989 T0: ~hrts 0nnsby -Spectftc Plans FRON: Steven A. Kupferman, Engineering Geologist ~ RE: Tentative Tract'24135 Slope Stability Report No. 89 The following report has been revtewed relattve to slope stability at the subject stte: · Slope Stability Analysts, Tentative Tract 24135, The Keadows at Rancho Ca]tfornta, Rancho California, CA," by Converse Consultants, dated December 5, 1988. This report determined that: 1. All slopes proposed for the subject tract at or below a hetght of 35 feet wtll be grossly stable. 2. Both cut and ftll slopes have a htgh potential for eroston of sandy materials and resultant surfictal instability. 3. 'Low strength parameters exist for claystones and siltstones. This report recommended that: Geologic Inspection of all cut slopes should be conducted during gradtrig. Buttress fills my be requtred for cut slopes with adverse mtertals or conditions. Proposed slopes at the site should be planted soon after construction and wtll require maintenance to perform tn a satisfactory manner through time, This report satisfies the General Plan requirement for a slope stability report. The reconmendattons tn thts report shall be adhered to tn the design and construction of thts project. SAK: rd RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNENT NEGAT/VE DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF DETERNINATION EA No. J3q~c~ NEGATIVE DECLARATION Based on the Zntttal Study, tt has been determined that the proposed pro;ject will not have significant environmental effect· PROJECT DESCRIRTION AND LOCATION: Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director CONPLETED Date ~o~- t~ Date Submitted Existing Zones 5P Changes of Proeosed Zones Only Zoning Acreage ADOPTED D B rd of Supervi lanningsops 'Comission Area Planning Council D l~ning Director D (Other) Title P/Lqqtr,' T/7' Land Dtv Sch Devel opabl e Lots 3Z~ Dev. Ac Open Space Lots. I~ O.Sp. Ac HEARING BODY OR OFFICER l ~ard of Supervisors arming Cormission NOTICE OF DETERNINATION ACTION ON PROJECT (~/~proval O Disapproval Date lYPt~-tq Area Planning Council D Fll'~ning Director D (Other) Developable Lets ~Z~' Dav.Ac Open Space Lots /9 O.Sp. Ac Changes of Approved Zones 0nly Zones Acreage The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration Person verifying i ~ Tttle ~7,,j7,,2/~ 'F/7" RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNENT 7 4080 LENON STREET, 9TH FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 295-31 (by. 10/83) COUNTY STAMP / qEVE: iDE councu. -PLAnnine DEP, :tCmEnC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: Eh%tlXIF_~TALRB~E88ME~Kf-A-)NUMBEP~ 33434 ~GASETYITmM) ANDMJ&IERS(s~ Vestinq Tract 24135 ~NAME: Bedford Propoerties NAME OFpERSOits)pREiMItli3E,~Chris 0nnsby, Planner L letMCT leFOIUM'rION ITANDARD EVALUATION MODULE NUMBEF~s): ~ ~ ~ ISCRIPTIC~lermlmlm. L:nm~mmWmmlotm~zemnclumesmmmPPlicmble): The site is located within approved Specific Plan No. 219. B~ IOTAL PROJECT ARF, k ACRES R3. ~ ~ AS_q~,e~OR$ PARCEL NO4m): 923-230-002 }. F,X~IGZOMNG: SP I~THEPROPOSALINCONFORk~kNCE? F_ PRC:)POBEDZC;)MNG: E THEPROPC~mNCONFORMANCE? F. ITREETREFERENCE~ The site is located East of Maroarita Rd.. in fhp WA~fprn portion of Specific Plan No. 219. IIE) ll)Vi/NSHIP, FUdNIOE)PTIONORAllACH A LEGAI. D ESCRIPTION: Township 8S, Range 2W The site consists of rolling hills which have been tilled. The site is vacant at present. · C~MFI~,I4BIIVI GI)IRAL IN, AN OPEN IPAC:E AND CONSERVATION DESmGNAllON ~J M or IM d tram pmimct milm i In '.'~m~Im~ Spec~ M" 'REMAP' or 'Rmncho Vmmpm C~mun~y D dlor lsrt dlm lxT4Kl jls ll b'Amm NM Dmignamd mC)lxn B'Uem'. G:m~iete Sgli~ns lll, N Ik, lfmdDmdYJ, VandVt. D Alorl:mftdlmlxoJoctjlslmmOl~81aoonndCc~'mrae~°ncJosigrmjonoemre'anth°m'~md~r~KJ elmer Compkm84Kmctm tlV(A,l, encS Eon~V mncl VL . ** I. ENVIIONMENTAL HAZAROI AND REIOURCEI AI~iwf"!MENT _-,. A, lediclteleselumoflap,~,l:e ~jlendueelsMl.,,',~l~tromem:dlw::tpUenssstoundinOc,,,CNihwnsiveGenera!~nF~um NA - N. ~;,~ L.. Cnead ~r,:~, ,J, ,,.~' .an ASk l Nonne~.o. ask I · l. Indlce wlte yes rr)oreo(N)ehetherety ],,tar,,., dal hezmrdmnd/or meoume lmues nmyeignlfKantly efiect or be a~ected Iwyeter,,,..-cv~ M,.A, , :;eliguraamcmnllJMd lnlm C~,,4:,,J'~an~'~GenemlRan- Iqgflny issue nwrked yes ff)write - 1Ilk,,- 'daM loumBl, .~ . ~b; ommultBd,~oir llicl lnd any mitiOBtton aurm unclef Seckm V. Also, where indicated, cideh'X. ,.x~-kndmewaemtyornolaaocB;XabWtymiing(s). (Seedefinmms~tboaomoftNspaOe). HAZARDS IN AJcKdm.aYiok~SpecadSiudesorCountyFeult 12-__N NqartNc~e0r~g.n.le.S,u.la. ll HBxafd Zonm ffig. YT.1) a VL12 & 1884 NCUZ Report, MAF.B.) Lefactjon; U R (Fig. VL3) ' e A B C D Fig, VI.!1) ~_ N Poerdiad Zone Ore. 'V1.1) 13. __N Ra, rced Noise (Fig. V1.13 - Vt.16) e 6 PS U R (Flg. VI.4) - 14.__N ~4~).~waAy B C D (Fig, V!.11) 3. 22B 0ree~kk~Zore(Iq0',/t.1) Noise (Fig. V!.lT-V!29) 4Y,.~. 8kapes(Riv. Co. e0QSca;eSJopeMaps) 15.__ Other Noise SN 10. N 11,.U_.. ~ism~MorOn-slt~'e;mum) i~ 8 PS U R P.Q~f~ Hazard (On-sIN Inspecton) Expensive Sob (U,S.D.A. Soil Conservetjon Seevice ~ Surveys) a._Z._Y f. mskx~ (U,S.DA So~ ConNrva~e SerdceScmSune~) 9_rd_ Wind Ersofion&Blowsand(Fig. VL1, OfcL460, klU&OrcL484) Dam kendata ken FeO- VI.7) (R; VLB) NA A B C D .(Fig. Vi.11) 16. __N -Project Generated Noise Affecting Noise Senfative Um (Fig. Vt.11 )- 17. Y Noise Sensitive Project (Rg. V1.11) 18. __Y Air Qulity laDacts From Project 19. N PmjeC!.~ Sensitive to Air Oustity 20. ~ Water Quality Impacts From Project 21. H Project Sensitive to Water Quality 2,2. __N Hazardous Materials and Wastes 23.N HIzardous Re Area (Fig. VL30 - VI.31) 24._ Olher 25.__ Olher RESOURCES 27__ korkmAgdcdtumlPfesewe 8runic I lig~%z&,o (FiO. VL45) 33__ Himodc~(Fig. VL32-Vt33) 34-N Archeeela6~cl:Resoumes (Fi;Vl.32-V1.33&Vl.4e-Vt.48) 85,,,,N Ikwe oNglQ Oic-, ReiNrues Paleomologlcal Reeources Map) 86,_,,, Oeee Definitions for Land Use kitability end Noise Acceptability Ratings NA - Not AF pric ~de 6 - 6erierarity ,que,,.~le PS - Pmvidonaliy Suitable U- Gen41rdYLkelldl e - RelMckld A - ~ly Acceptable l- C(,,dlKd'lllyAccepll~e C - 6eNwldtyUreccsl:f"t'de D - LandUNDiscoumged 1. CImEN~A/I)C,(4;;-..m/AllONIIAPDES~)NA~m): Aoprnv,,H %pecific Plan ,n ~lq & LA/~IMI~NtEk Southwest Territory Land Use PlAnning ~ ~~~F~:' off Palomar Observatory Street lighting Policies [L CCXdMLNTYFLAN. FAHY: Southwest'Area Plan (under study) I CCAIIL, NTYPt.N~REfir3~RTK)~FH: 81j~C)FpCN, iC:G~)~~The comprehensive policies and pro.iect desiqn component described in Specific Plan No. ?lq ,rp ~F~pllr,hl* tn fh~ project. More specifically, the focus of the applicable policies is on Planning Area 17, which encompasses the entire proposal. Fom'ml rmo~m ~;q'-. in~w~h mywm (Y) or no(N) wh~hmr mny publ~fm~,~l~ie~ mnd/or~ im.t~ms may mignfficmntly m~m~ ~ be m~ by ~he pr~12e mwm. NI ref.arancmd figurea mm ¢ontmir~ in ff~e C, omlxeem C, mneml I~. Fix tony ie PUBUC FACILITIES AND SERVICES I_ Y Cwcmim~on (Re. N.l W. l l. lXmcmm in k V ~ Raved & IlmqulU Romma) lle Trels (Fill. N.12 - W.13) Wem(AgmNLaemm) leqmerC~Laemm) Flml Tmmti: I m (Fig. N.18 ' N.18) M t m,,,/c m, (IN N.17 - N.18) ImM (Fig. N.1T - N.18) laid Vie (Iqg. N.17 - N.18) Imedm erd llBcxmBtm ~ N.11' NZ)) ~N l:~_V 13,Y._. 14Y__ Ecmueeen Trails (Fig. IV.19 - N.24/ Riv. Cc~ 80O ScNe Ecpamuimn Trim Utwem 0rag. N.2S · N.26) L.ba~ (Fag. N.17 - N.18) HeeJIh Sendcam (Irmg. N,I? · N.18) Nmlxmm {Fig. IL18.2 - 1.18.4. 1.188 - 1.11.10 & N.27 - N.36) I)immmWl%,_l:m,,d ,.row C. Idmpmmeclblmdec:tklm:mledln"MolSdSIxcIkPWe',"FIEIdArm kern", roedew in mkdml Im mfmclic polcimm afroplying W e I,.,-i:%el, erie c6...p~elm ~ 1. 81mlmmmkmummdmm~ImmlmV~m): D. ~.~rped~pft:~c:~~A~t~bd~p~p~c~.~dbn~n~mm~m~te e:i'fqM~l,,T.,3, eekd?. Coni~eleqLel~ns4, LSandTIlkineComnxmJtYPbA. 1. land me ce4egory(ks) nmcmf--,y to mapport eke r,,,.¢ammcf project. Aao Indicate lend use type din.._e~lial, or,,,.,,e ._'el, elc.) (Xamnt land me cebgmlp(m) 1grim die bmecl on exist~ oc~lWk:~ in. mkbnMl or..,.,j.~i', etc.) Also inclk:me I~d use type Z a D.1 elks hm D2. will me dlkwK~ be msolvs¢l st t:e ~s~4tc~,znt sage? EKpkin: 4. ~ Pan desjgnatk:r:(s): S b 1he I-,.;ased project consklent wtm the policies and desiQrmlk}ns of Ihe Community Pin? InoL mpim: 6. the :a,.;~:-s cmmpatible with existing and ;h~secl suffouncling land lnot, mq=kk~ Beeel meds irdikd miLK:h/, b the r,,,l:gee: ooradslent with the Compeslesive General Ran? I no(..a~e ~,te by ~and lmoe Nufvdafihom kmjes idoNJfyinO ku:orw~rkc~er F_ I ai or part of le project erie b ben Olan 81ace ere CoFtrv-~3~ desbna~Qfi. ~te the btlowing: t 81delededgndon(s~ 3. BltederllhM inlld lixly, bh~=llt~~h~~~? Inol,_jk,_ ca bySeclkm and leeue Numlaremee ksues lclmtify~~qmc~. d L V_.: IIFORMATIOll IOURCEI. FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES A, A~IDrI'IONAL ~TION REQUIFIED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED: DATE DATE N)EOUACY ISSUE NO. REDUIRED For tlch illUe enidrid yII (Y) under SicIra III,B lnd N,B, Ii:ilnltfy the Sectjim Inl:l illue number and cIo the ktowtng, inllte lonnmtms mhown below:. 1. Ultd'~kltl;,~vfmlev~ntdl~loum~,includinglgmtci~cenluIt~l. ~ ~t~te d tad'rags Of ~ re~rding environmental 3. 8tale Ipectc mlti~tion rn~ures, II k:l~tir~)le without rm3giring In environmental implet report (E.I.R.) 4, ff Idditionll kdonnltion il requtrecl before the envirortmentll IIlellment can be completed, refer to S~LBacE:n A. 5. If addlliorlll Ihletl Ire ~ to cl:)mpllte Ihil tlctiofi, chick ~he box It h MId of the lection and Itt3ch · e nmcemwery ~eets. IIIB.3 IIIB.4,8 IIIB.17 SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OFFACT, M~IGATION MEASURES: The General Plan designation for land use suitability pertaining to O~OUndch~nO 4~ ~,~if~hl~ Pnf~n+~l inlp~rf~ ran h~ mitigated tn ~n acceptable level throuqh conformance with the Uniform Building Code and County ordinances. Potential siqnificant impacts related to slopes and erosion includes the' visual appearance of permanently altered land forms, severe erosion of unprotected slopes and possible slope instability. The potential impact pertaining to visual appearance is mitigated by Development Standards outlined in Section XIIA.6 of SpeCifiC Plan No. 219. The potential for erosion is being studied in a slope stability study and the development of speCifiC reauirements for alluvial/colluvial removal at the tract staqe. Temporary groundcover will be provided to prevent erosion during the construction phase a~ indicated in EIR No. 235. Potential noise impacts will be determined by noise studies to be rnnd,,rtpd ~lnrtg rnRdw~y~. Hitigation will include heiqht of atte~ion wall and any other reconmnended by the noise study. Nonitoring and r~pnrtirLg i~ reqJJired. V. 3NFORMATION IOURCEI, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEAIURES (continued) IIIB.18 80URCE~AOENCIESCONSULTED. F1NDIN~SOFFACT. MITIGA~ON MEASURES: A statement of overridinq findings was adopted by the Board of Supervisors for cumulative effects on air quality Which cannot be fullv IIIB.26 mitioated. Although a small portion of the Site has soils suitable for agriculture based on the General Plan· it was determined in EIR No. 235 that there ITTR.?R would be no significant impact due to the loss of agricultural land. The ~ife i~ within the historic range of the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat. A biological report prepared for The Neadows Specific Plan (SP 219) indicated that nnnp nf th; ~perie~ were loratPd nn the ~ite nf ~hP tract. Therefore, no mitiqation was required. TVR 11-15 Th~ i~c,,,c h~v, h~,n di~r,m~d ~nd ~ddr~pd in ~pprifir Plan Nn, ?]g, Correspondinq environmental review is thorouqhly discussed in EIR rio. 235. Impacts have been reduced to an acceptable level. Vl. ENVIRONMENTAl. NPACT DETERMINATION: The ~ d not hew a ~ effect .n ate ewtmmett end · Negative Declemtk>n may be m~xrecL Thl ~ M hlvl · I(~lllk}lfi( ~ ~ ~ll :lrlVimOr..mulrmt, I'ov.e,.ar, ~ will mat N · mignir~nt ~mm~lmy Chris Ormsby y r.-tm: January/7,/1989 -- CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 24135 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL Maintenance Retention Monument Security FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY $ 273,000 76,000 72,500 $ 421,500 $42,500 $18,000 DATE: May 24, 1994 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY $ 136,500 38,000 36,500 $ 211,000 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee Fire Mitigation Fee - Paid Signal Mitigation Fee - Paid Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees $ N/A $ Exempt $ 23,600.00 $ 8,850.00 $ N/A $ T.B.D* SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Letter of Map Revision (LOMAR Review) Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *T,B,D. - To be determined 164.00 8.00 2,710.00 N/A 900.00 N/A 3,682.00 0.00 -4- r:\agdrpt%94\0524\24135.agn skg KENNETH L EDWARDS GENERAL MANAGER.CH(Ir ENGINEER RIVERSIDE COUNTY fLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT September 17, 1993 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE. CA 92501.1719 (909) 275-1200 (909) 788-9965 FAX City of Temecula Public Works Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92591 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: The Meadows Paloma Del Sol West This-letter is sent at the request of Michael A. Tylman of Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates. The following referenced tracts are not within the boundaries of the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan. No area drainage plan fees are'required for these developments. TRACTS 24131-1, 2, 3 & F 24133-1, 2, 3, 5 & F 24134-3 & F 24135-1, 2, 3 & F 24136-1, 2, 3 & F Portions of the following tracts are within the boundaries, for which fees have been paid. The remainder of these same tracts are not subject to any fees: TRACTS 24132-1 & F 24133-4 24134-1 & 2 Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at 909/275-1265. L .' D c RsoN Senior Civil Engineer c: Michael A. Tylman, RBF SK:slj skl0917a RESTATEMENT AND AMENDMENT OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA and BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and MESA HO1VIES (Park ~Fees). INDEX 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.' 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Page Amend Development Agreement ............................. 4 Eastside Tract Maps .................................... 5 Cost of Litigation ...................................... 5 Public Facilities Fees Shortfall .............................. 6 Reimbursement of Fees ................................... 6 Parks, Greenbelts and Paseos ............................ L . . 6 Main Recreation Areas ................................... 7 Remaining Open Space Areas ............................... 8 Timing of Park Improvements and Transfer to City .................. 8 Fee Credits .......................................... 9 Standstill Agreement .................................... 9 Park Fee Obligation .................................. ... . 10 Jurisdiction and Attorneys' Fees ............................. 10 Severability .......................................... 10 Entire Agreement ...................................... 10 Construction ......................................... 10 Amendment of Agreement ........................... ' ...... 11 Time of the Essence .................................... 11 No Precommitment ..................................... 11 Pay Under Protest ....................................... 11 Superseding ......................................... 11 Counterparts ......................................... 12 07-30-92 1772,1 -O00z,9 r-:\DOC\15Z\92010026.I,I~ EXHIBITS EXHIBIT "A" - MAP OF PARKS, PASEOS, GREENBELTS 07-30-92 1~2.1 G: M)OC \ I 52\92010026.1406 i i RESTATEMENT AND AMENDMENT OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (Quimby Park Fees) This Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding CMOU") is entered into by and between the City of Temecula ("City") and Bedford Development Company and Mesa Homes (collectively "Bedford") to be effective on August 11, 1992, with reference to the following: RECITALS A. City and Bedford have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding effective January 31,. 1992. City and Bedford wish to restate and amend the Memorandum of Understanding to modify certain provisions due to changed circumstances. B. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864, et seq. 'Development Agreement Statutes"), Bedford and the County of Riverside ("County") entered into Development Agreement No. 4 recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County on November 7, 1988, as Instrument No. 325513 ("Development Agreement"). C. The Development Agreement encompasses a project formerly located within County approved Specific Plan No. 219 ("Specific Plan") known as "Paloma del Sol", a mixed use subdivision project to be developed on property owned by Bedford which became a part of the municipal boundaries of the City when the City incorporated on December 1, 1989. D. Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement Statutes, the City became the successor-in-interest to the County under the Development Agreement upon incorporation of the City. E. A dispute has arisen between the City and Bedford over the amount of fees or land dedication for park or recreational purposes Bedford is required to provide to City as allowed under Section 66477 of the California Government Cede CQuimby Park :ees"). 07-30-92 12221-00049 G: \DOC\ 152\92010026.1406 F. On May 20, 1987, the County amended Ordinance No. 460 authorizing the imposition of Quimby Park Fees. Ordinance No. 460 required adoption of an implementation resolution designating a recipient of the Quimby Park Fees. On June 28, 1988, pursuant to Resolution No. 88-218, the County designated CSA 143 as the recipient of Quimby Park Fees subject to the adoption of a master plan. On June 27, 1989, pursuant to Resolution No. 89-331, the County adopted a master plan for CSA 143, establishing the Quimby Park Fees at three (3) acres per 1,000 new residents ("County Park Fee Standard"). G. Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-53, adopted on May 8, 1990, City has adopted Quimby Park Fees of five (5) acres of land for parks and recreational purposes, or payment of fees in lieu thereof, for every 1,000 people to reside in the proposed subdivision ("City Park Fee Standard"). H. The City interprets the Development Agreement to permit the imposition of increased Quimby Park Fees computed on the City Park Fee Standard and has required Bedford to pay Quimby Park Fees based on the City Park Fee Standard as a condition of issuance of building permits for Paloma del Sol. Bedford disagrees with this position and interprets the provisions of the Development Agreement to limit the City's authority to impose Quimby Park Fees based on the park and open space requirements of the Specific Plan as approved by the County and incorporated into the Development Agreement. I. In order to avoid a legal challenge to the Quimby Park Fees and to prevent the running of any relevant statutes of limitation while attempts are being made to resolve this dispute, Bedford and City have entered into a Standstill Agreement effective on April 9, 1991, as amended ("Standstill Agreement"). J. City and Bedford acknowledge that development of Paloma del Sol will result in a generation of significant municipal revenue, public infrastructure facilities and the enhancement of the quality of life, including recreation facilities for present and future residents of the City. The benefits to the City and Bedford contemplated by Paloma del Sol include: (1) the opportunity for a high quality residential-commercial project creating significant job opportunities, sales tax and ad valorem tax revenues for the City; 07-30-~ 127..21-00~9 G:\DOC\152~gZO10026.I,K}6 2 (2) payment of substantial impact fees to be used to solve City and regional traffic infrastructure demands; (3) a payment of public facilities fees; (4) (5) participation in special assessment and/or community facilities districts to finance City and regional infrastructure improvements; the Creation of significant park, recreation and open space dedications for public use and the protection of significant natural resources. K. It is contemplated that the Specific Plan will be mended (Amendment No. 3) to: (i) add an 8+ acre neighborhood park at the southeast comer of De Portola Road and "H" Street; (ii) change the target density for Planning Area 6 up to 19.8 du/ac; .~d (iii) clarify the intent of the Specific Plan to be consistent with the terms and conditions of the approved vesting tentative map for Paloma del Sol. L. The new 8 + acre park to be dedicated by Bedford to the City is located in Planning Area 6 of the Specific Plan. Planning Area 6 provides for development of 37.8 acres with Very High density residential use at a maximum total of 590 dwelling units. At such time as the Specific Plan is amended to delineate the 8+ acre park, the remainder of Planning Area 6 will be reduced to 29.8 acres. Thereafter, development of Planning Area 6 up to the maximum number of 590 residential dwelling units will fall within the allowable Density Range of 14-20 du/ac of the Specific Plan but not within the target density of 15.6 du/ac unless the target density for Planning Area 6 is amended to 19.8 du/ac as part of Specific Plan Amendment No. 3. M. The City and Bedford acknowledge that due to the present economic recession, none of these benefits to the City are possible unless the Paloma del Sol project proceeds with development. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the present structure of fees and private recreation and open space requirements creams substantial mpediments to development of Paloma del Sol. 07-30-92 12221-00049 G: \OOC \ 152\92010026. NO.6 3 N. Without admitting or determining any rights or obligations as between City and Bedford, each to the other, with respect to the amount of the Quimby Park Fees, and solely to avoid the potential expense and inconvenience of protracted litigation, and to balance the needs of the City to provide adequate parks and recreational facilities with the difficulty of'land development in today's economy, City and Bedford agree to settle this matter based on the terms and conditions of this MOU. AGREEMENT 1. Amend Development Agreement. In accordance with the procedures set forth in the Development Agreement Statutes, City and Bedford shall commence the necessary proceedings to consider amending the Development Agreement to: eliminate the County Public Facilities and Services Mitigation Fee'and replace it with a City Public Facilities Fee; provide that for a period of two (2) years from the date of recording the amendment to the Development Agreement, the City Public Facilities Fee shall be paid in lieu of the Regional Statistical Area Fee CRSA Fee") established by County Ordinance No. 659 adopted by the City and in lieu of the County Public Facilities Fee set forth in the Development Agreement; provide that for a period of two (2) years from the date of recording the amendment to the Development Agreement, the City Public Facilities Fee shall be Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) per each residential unit ("Interim Public Facilities Fee" as applied to the development of Paloma del Sol whether constructed by Bedford or any other merchant builder purchasing Paloma del Sol tracts from Bedford. Bedford shall pay K-Rat, fire, traffic signal and drainage mitigation fees; 07-30-92 G: ~OC \ 152\92010026 4 provide that after said two year period the amount of the Interim Public Facilities Fee shall be increased up to the amount of the City's Public Facilities Fee imposed on all projects in the City at that time. In the event the City has not adopted a City Public Facility Fee by the end of said two year period, Bedford shall continue to pay the Interim Public Facilities Fee until such time as the City adopts a City Public Facilities Fee; provide that Bedford will be subject to paying a City Public Facilities Fee for non-residential development in the Paloma del Sol project in accordance with the provisions of the City's non- residential Public Facilities Fee ordinance. In the event the City has not adopted a Public Facilities Fee for non-residential development at the time of issuance of building permits for commercial construction, Bedford agrees to abide by the City's procedures relating to payment of future non-residential ,Public Facilities Fees applicable to all projects in the City in effect at that time; and provide that the park land and recreation facilities to be dedicated to the City as contemplated by' this MOU shall fully satisfy Bedford's obligation to pay Quimby Park Fees and to provide parks and recreational facilities for the Paloma del Sol project consistent with the Specific Plan and this MOU. 2. Eastside Tract Maps. City shall cooperate in commencing the necessary proceedings in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act to amend the Paloma del Sol "Eastside" Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 24182, 24184, 24185, 24186, 24187 and 24188 with no new conditions inconsistent with the terms of the Specific Plan as may be amended and this MOU, including the 8-Acre Park described in Section 7(a) of this MOU. Neither party waives its rights as to what constitutes "consistency" with the Specific Plan. 3. Cost of Litigation. In the event the County seeks to challenge the right of City and Bedford to enter into this MOU or to amend the Development Agreement and institutes an action, suit or proceeding to challenge this MOU or invalidate and/or enjoin the 07-30-92 12221-000t,9 G: \DOC \ 152\92010026. ~ 5 enforcement of this MOU or the amendment to the Development Agreement or take such other action(s) which result in unreasonable delays in the development of the Paloma del Sol project, the parties agree to cooperate and participate in a joint defense in any action against the parties, their officers, agents and employees, from any and all such obligations, liability, suit, claim, loss, judgment, lien, resulting from such action(s) brought by County (but excluding actions to expunge any lis pendens) and to share equally the costs associated with attorneys' fees, costs and damages that the parties may incur as a result of any such actions or lawsuit to challenge City and/or Bedford's legal authority to enter into this MOU and/or amend the Development Agreement. In the event the County prevails in any such litigation after exhaustion of any procedural appeals, the provisions relating to the payment of Interim Public Facilities Fees as set forth in this MOU and/or the amendment to the Development Agreement shall terminate. 4. Public Facilities Fees Shortfall. In the event the County prevails in any legal action or other proceeding to challenge, set aside, or enjoin the enforcement of the amendment to the Development Agreement and a court or other tribunal having jurisdiction over the matter after all appeals are taken, determines that Bedford and/or the City is liable to make up any shortfall in the amount of the Public Facilities and Services Mitigation fees owned by City and/or Bedford to County, then City and Bedford shall each share equally in paying any such shortfall. 5. Reimbursement of Fees. If prior to the amendment to the Development Agreement and in the event Bedford is required to pay public facilities fees and/or RSA fees in an amount greater than the amount set forth in the amendment to the Development Agreement, Bedford shall be entitled to reimbursement of the difference in the amount of the fees paid within thirty (30) days of the date of recordation of the Amendment to the Development Agreement. 6. Parks. Greenbelts and Paseos. As additional consideration for entering into this MOU, Bedford agrees to dedicate to the City, or cause to be dedicated, and City agrees to accept when offered, park land, greenbelts, slopes and paseos equalling approximately 166.5 acres. Bedford and the Paloma del Sol Association ("Association") may also dedicate approximately 27.5 acres of park land and paseos to the City. The park land, greenbelts, slopes and paseos are described on Exhibit A which is attached and made a part hereof and incorporated by this reference. 07-30-92 12221-00049 G: XOOC\152\92010026.R06 6 7. Main Recreation Areas. The six main recreation areas and the terms for dedication to the City are described as follows: (a) An eight-acre park located in Specific Plan Planning Area No. 6 and within Tentative Tract 25417 (8-Acre Park) will be improved with two baseball diamonds/soccer field combination with lights, restroom and concession building, group picnic area, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot. (b) A seven and seventy-four hundredths (7.74) acre park located in Tract 24133-2, Lot 114 C7.74 Acre Park") will be improved as a "passive park" and may be dedicated to the City in Bedford's sole discretion sometime in the future. ' ' (c) A thirteen and eighty-four hundredths (13.84) acre paseo park located in Tract 24133-3, Lot 106 ("13.84 Acre Paseo Park") currently improved with tot lots, basketball courts, tennis court, picnic areas with tables and barbecues, walkways/bikeways with lighting and may be dedicated to the City at sometime'in the future at Bedford's discretion and after receiving the prior consent of at least a majority of the .nerohers of the Association. (d) An approximate five and nine tenths (5.9) acre paseo park located in Tract 24134-3, Lots 68, 69, 70, 71 and a portion of Lot 83 of Tract 24134-F ("5.9 Acre Paseo Park") currently improved with a tot lot, basketball court, picnic areas with tables and barbecue, walkways/bikeways with lighting. This park is owned by the Association and may at the discretion of the Association be dedicated to the City' sometime in the future. (e) A seven and forty-four hundredths (7.44) acre park located in the Eastside (future) Tract 24186-4, Lot 1 ("7.44 Acre Park") planned to be improved with a combination soccer/baseball field with lights, restrooms and concession building, group picnic area, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot. (f) A nine and thirty-five hundredths (9.35) acre paseo park located in the Eastside (future) Tracts including: Lots 159 and 160 of (future) Tract 24186-1; Lots 121 and 129 of (future) Tract 24186-2 and Lot 121 of (future) Tract 24187-F ("9.35 Acre 07-30-92 12221-000~9 G:XO(X:\15Z\92010026.N06 7 Paseo Park") planned to be improved with a basketball court, tot lot, picnic area, walkway/bikeways with lighting landscaping and irrigation. 8. Remaining Open Space Areas. (a) The remaining recreation and open space areas consist of 142 acres of greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, public parkway and slope landscaping, both east and west sides of Paloma del Sol. Co) Those perimeter and interior greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, parks and slopes shown on Exhibit A which are transferred to the City will be maintained by the Temecula Community Services District CTCSD"). All assessments for maintenance shall be in compliance with the standards and formulas imposed by the TCSD on a city- wide basis. 9. Timing of Park Improvements and Transfer to City. (a) The 8-Acre Park shall be fully improved and transferred to the City as soon as December 31, 1992, but no later than March 31, 1993. Additional street improvements to De Portola and construction of Campanula Way adjacent to the 8-Acre park will be completed as development of the adjoining tracts occurs, but not later than five (5) years from the date of the amendment of the Development Agreement. (b) Improvement to the 7.44-Acre Park shall commence at the time of development of the adjoining tracts (Tract Nos. 24186-1, 2, 3, 4 and Final). Improvements to the 9.35-Acre Paseo Park shall commence at the time of development of the adjoining tracts (Tract Nos. 24186-1, 2 and Final). Improvements to the 7.44 Acre Park and the 9.35-Acre Paseo Park shall be completed on or before the issuance of 50% of the certificates of occupancy for the dwelling units constructed in the.adjoining tracts. Both of these parks shall be transferred to the City in accordance with the current TCSD funding procedures and practices. (c) Improvement to and transfer of the remaining 142 acres of greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, public parkway and slope landscaping, both East and 07-30-92 17_7_21-0004.9 G:\DOC\152\g2010026,1~I06 8 Nest sides of Paloma del Sol shall occur with the completion of development of the adjoining tracts and in accordance with the current TCSD funding procedures and practices. (d) Bedford may extend the improvement completion and park transfer dates as set forth in this MOU with written consent from the City. (e) City shall receive and approve all park and recreation facilities improvement plans in accordance with the City's park standards, procedures and specifications except the City shall accept without any modifications to the improvements to the 13.84-Acre Paseo Park and the 5.9-Acre Paseo Park as curren~y constructed and installed provided these parks are transferred to the City. (f) The approximately 194 acres of parks, greenbelts and paseos shall be transferred to the City by grant deeds from Bedford and the Association, depending on ownership. City agrees to accept the parks and any improvements within a reasonable time of being offered for dedication. The City shall be responsible for establishing any maintenance obligations with the TCSD associated with the parks, paseos and greenbelt -~reas described in this MOU. 10. Fee Credits. At the time of completion of the improvements and transfer of each of the public parks as provided in this MOU, Bedford shall receive a credit against payment of future City Public Facilities Fees based on the actual improvement cost incurred by Bedford for each of said public parks up to a maximum credit of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). City shall have a right. to re. view, audit and verify all costs associated with said park improvements under procedures to be mutually agreed upon between the parties. 11. Standstill Agreement. Until the Development Agreement is amended as contemplated by this MOU, the Standstill Agreement shall govern the rights and obligations of the parties with regards to Quimby Park Fees associated with the Paloma del Sol project, except that it shall be amended to remain in full force and effect until a certificate of occupancy is issued by the City for the 500th residential dwelling unit in the Paloma del Sol project. 07-30-92 17_?..2.1 -O00z,9 G: \1~0C\152\92010026. E 9 12. Park Fee Obligation. Upon execution of this MOLT by the parties, regardless of undue delays or the outcome of any lawsuit or action brought by County or terms of settlement of any action or proceeding which may be instituted by the County against City and/or Bedford relating to this MOU or the amendment to the Development Agreement, Bedford's Quimby Park Fee obligation for the Paloma del Sol project shall be satisfied based on the requirements provided in Sections 6, 7 and 8 of this MOU excluding Tract 24183 which currenfiy satisfies the City Park Fee Standard. Bedford's Quimby Park Fee obligation with regard to Planning Area 6, as shown on Exhibit A, up to the maximum number of 590 attached residential units permitted by the Specific Plan Density Range shall also be satisfied. 13. Jurisdiction and Attorneys' Fees. This MOU is made and entered into in the State of California, and this MOU, and any rights, remedies, or obligations provided for herein shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 14. Severability. If any portion, provision or part of this MOU is held, determined, or adjudicated to be invalid, unenforeeable, or void for any reason whatsoever, each such portion, provision, or part shall be severed from the remaining portions, provisions, or parts of this MOU and shall not affect the validity or enforceability of such remaining portions, provisions, or parts. 15. Entire Agreement. This MOU contains the entire understanding and agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the matters referred to herein. No other representations,-covenants, undertakings or other prior to contemporaneous agreements, oral or written, respecting such matters, which are not specifically incorporated herein, shall be deemed in any way to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. The parties hereto acknowledge that each party has not executed this MOU in reliance on any such promise, representation, or warranty. 16. Construction. This MOU shall not be construed against the party preparing it, but shall be construed as if both parties jointly prepared this MOU and any uncertainty and ambiguity shall not be interpreted against any one party. 07-30-92 12.221 G: \DOC\ 152\92010026.1106 10 17. Amendment of Agreement. This MOU shall not be modified by either party by oral representation made before or after the execution of this MOU. All modifications must be in writing and signed by the parties, and each of them. 18. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence for the performance of each and every covenants and the satisfaction of each and every condition contained in this MOU. 19. No Precommitment. City and Bedford understand and agree that certain actions of the City contemplated by this MOU will require compliance with legal procedures regulations and public hearings accompanied by discretionary decisions. The parties acknowledge that nothing contained in this MOU shall be construed as a precommitment or requiring the City Planning Commission or City Council to approve any discretionary actions contemplated by this MOU. 20. Pay Under Protest. This will acknowledge that as agreed to in the Tanuary 31, 1992 MOU, Bedford has withdrawn its notices of payment of permit fees under ~rotest and terminated the Standstill Agreement relating to said fees. 21. Superseding. This MOU shall supersede, amend, and restate the Memorandum of Understanding effective January 31, 1992, and shall control the rights, duties and obligations of the parties as to the subject matter of this MOU. 07-30-~ 17_?_.2.1 -O00z~9 G: \DOC\152\92010026. e 11 22. Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. ATTEST: June Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA BY:~ ~ Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor Csaba F. Ko, Vice President MESA HOMES, a CaliforU~_orporation Wilfiam M. Butler, President 07-30-92 122221-000049 G:\DOC\152\92010026.M06 12 ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT 'City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 24, 1994 Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-2 (located east of Margarita Road and north of De Portola Road) PREPARED BY: ~v/Raymond A. Cesey, Principal Engineer - Land Development <::~Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-2 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract No. 24135 was originally submitted to Riverside County Planning Department on January 3, 1989. The Tentative Vesting Tract Map was approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 23, 1989. Tentative Tract No. 24135-2 was granted an extension of time by the "Amendment and Restatement of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, Bedford Development Company, and Mesa Homes (Park Fees)" recorded February 18, 1993 (attached). The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval. Final Vesting Tract No. 24135-2 contains 75 residential lots and 2 open space lots within 16.93 gross acres. The tract is located east of Margarita Road and north of De Portola Road. This tract is part of the Meadows Specific Plan (County approved SP 219) and County of Riverside Development Agreement No. 4. The applicant is Kemper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC), Inc. The following fees have been paid for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-2: Signal Mitigation Fee Fire Mitigation Fee Stephen's K-Rat Fee ~ 11,250.00 30,000.00 23,500.00 -1 - r:%agdrpt%94\0524\24135-2.agn skg The following fees have been deferred for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-2: Public Facilities Fee Flood Control Fee (ADP) Due prior to Building Permit Exempt per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 (attached) The parkland dedication requirement (Quimby) has been satisfied pursuant to the "Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, KRDC, Inc. (formerly Bedford Development Company) and Mesa Homes (Park Fees)", which was approved by City Council on December 8, 1992. Among other things, this Development Agreement provides for the granting of several improved parks to the City. The initial Paloma Del Sol City Park has been completed end was accepted by the City on January 25, 1994. The following bonds have been posted for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-2: Faithful Labor & Performance Material Subdivision Monument Street and Drainage $472,500 $236,500 Water 9112,500 956,500 Sewer 9119,500 960,000 Survey Monuments 919,000 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Development Fee Checklist Location Map Copy of Map Conditions of Approval Fees and Securities Report RCFCD letter dated September 17, 1993 Copy of Restatement and Amendment to Dev. Agree. No. 4 -2- r:~agdrpt\94\0524\24135-2.agn skg CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Vesting Tract MaD No. 24135-2 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees) Traffic Signal Mitigation Public Facility Condition of Aooroval Condition No. 26b See Staff Report See Road Department Letter Dated 4/12/89, Item 22 Pursuant to Development Agreement Fire Mitigation Flood Control (ADP) See Fire Department Letter Dated 2/24/89 Exempt per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 -3- r:\agdrpt\94~0524\24135-2.egn skg TRACT 24135-2 VICINITY ivl,, P /l RIVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPARTNENT SUBDIVISZON CONDZTZONS OF APPROVAL. VESTZNG TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135 ANENDED NO. i C) -; D_ S_ C) C~ C~, STANDARD CONDZTZONS The subdivider shall defend, Indemnify, and hold harmless the County of RIverside, Its agents, officers, and employees from any clatm, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or tts agents, officers, or employees to attack, set astde, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advtsory agencte p 81 boards or legislative body concerning Vesttng Tentative Tract Amended No I ~hich action is brought about within the time pertod provided for tn California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of RIverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, actton, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. Zf the County fails-to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully In the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, Indemnify, or hold hamless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Nap Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be-prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Hap Act and Ordinance 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. · If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of a comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as may be additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. TENTATZVE TRACT N0. 24Z35, #mo. ,. CondfUons of Approval Page 2 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. A grading pemit shall be obtained from the Department of Builaing and Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintainea road right of way. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recoraation of time fi no1 map. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlini~d in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated i-6-tJg~ 4-12-89 a copy of which is attached. (~ended - PlanninV Commission - April 12, 19a9) Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be proviaed from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing bo~ accepts or abanaons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approvea by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commissioner. Easements, when uti 1 i ties, etc., wi thin the 1 and conveyances shal 1 Su r veyo r. required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, shall be shown on the final map if they are located division boundary. All offers of dedication ano be submittec~ and recordeo as cli recteo by the County Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County health Department°s letter dated 2-27-89 a copy of which is attached. The subdi vi der shal I comply with the flood control recommenc/ati ons outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter oatea 3-27-89 a copy of which is attached. If the lane division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of 'area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Conmnissioner. The subdi vi der shal 1 comply ~ th the fi re improvement recommenoati ons outlined in the County Fire Marshal's letter dated 2-24-89, a copy of which is attached. Subdivision phasing, including any proposeo common open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially confore to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval; TENTATTVE TRACT NO. 24135, AId. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 3 19. 0e The subdivider and all successors in interest shall comply with the provisions of Development Agreement No. 4 and Specific Plan No. 219. Lots created by this subdivision.shall comply with the following: a) All lots shall have a minimum size of 5,000 square feet; b) Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to'Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and non-through lots. c) Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Specific Plan zone. d) e) Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas, located in recreation areas shall be located away and visually screened from surrounding areas with the use of block walls and landscaping. (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) f) Bike racks and bike lockers in sufficient quantity shall be provided in convenient locations to facilitate bike access to the p~e~eet aPea recreation areas. {Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met: County Fire Department County Flood Control County Health Department County Parks Department A property owners' association with the unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs shall be' established and continuously maintained. The association shall have the right to lien the property of the owners who default in the payment of their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any encumbrance other than a first deed of trust provided such deed of trust is made in good faith and for value and is of record prior to the lien of the association. TENTATIVE TRACT'NO. 24135. Conditions of Approval Page 4 PwCew ,e wesewda,¢ee of ~he fiae~ eep~ 4he sebd~v4dew ek,~ eeevey ~e 4ke Geeely ~ee simple ttt~e, ks e~l omen ew omen open spa, ,re,s, ~pee and e~eer e~ ,~; qtenS, ekes, ass,sam, at, leases (reeerded ned eareeerded~ sad ease, eats, eNeept these easemeats whieh 4n the ee;e dis,retina e~ She Go, ely awe ,eeeptab~e. As needtit,as pro**deal ~e {he Go,ely lee,plieS tll~e to seek feb;owing deeueeats 4e the P~,aataS Deportmeat few wev~ew? wkiek donemeats eka~ be eub~ee~ le the appwev,~ Go,ely GeneseS+ A samWee dos,meat eeaveytaS t&l~e le the pePeheseP e~ as (edivtdua~ sendill,as end Pestrtetteas Is taeerpereted tkewe~n by ~e~ereaee. ;he dee;aret4en of ,eve,eats, SeedStieRS. and ~.estr4etiees sobmilled ~e~ review shs~ ~s~ provide ~er a tom e~ 6g years, ~b½ prev~de ~e~ the esteb~skmeat of a p~epe~ty e~eweA ass,elation eemp~tsed of 4he owners ef any pwevislea 4a 4his Dee~erat~ea ~e 4he eeat~a;y, pPevtstea sh,~ apply+ Gnuely of R~vers~dev mad ~ke p~ope~ty ew, ers~ ,sses~et~en ske~ eneead~t~ene~y eeeep~ from the Geen~y of Rlveps4dev ewes the demand, ~tt~e ks a~ e~ any park e~ She Aomea a~ea~, mere pep~ee~ap~y desep4bed aS bets A tkreeSk M ea ¥est~ng ~ae~ Nap ~4~a; beaded No. t. ~ke dee~s~ea 4e requ~e aetiva~iea ef ~ke assee4a~en veeend~eea~y aeeep~ ~e (e ~he Ae~ee awea~ ska~ a~ lke sere d~se~et4ee of lke ;ee,~yef R4vePs~de. ;a She event 4hot lke ,met awe,, e~ say Fowl 4ke~eef, 4s eeaveyed 4e the properly ,weetea assent,ties, She An,Noes areas, er any left Skew*efT absent e~ {he PieRe&ms e&~eotff of fhe Geeely of R~veweide ff4he Geeety~S lke ~lSkt 4e assess 4he ewe,we of eaek 4ad~v~de,~ Peaseaeb~e nest of ma4al,4atas seen Ann,ten aweoz, sad ~kt Is ~ea tke p~epewty of amy seen ewee~ who de~ee~te 4a ~ke payment e~ a m4ateaaaee assessmeal, As assessment ~ea, eaee neesled, ska~ be p~er ~o ,~ etke~ TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amcl. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 5 1. ;k~s Des;a~atSsn ska~ fist be ~eee~eatedT ~substattCa~y~ ameRded o~ Wwepewty deaeneNed lhewefpem absen~ $he pp~ew WP~i&eR eensen~ s~ She sueeessew-tn-tntewestv A pwepesed amendment sha~ be eees4dewed ~substsetis~ 4~ 4t a~eets (he enfant1 usage e~ leistesssee e~ ~he ~eeeenoe apiary &e (he event FIr any eee~&st between (his Bes~a~atieR and ~he Awt~e~es e~ hee~pewatieeT tke By~awsT ew tke pwepewty eweews~ asseeiat~en Ru~es and Regu~atiees~ 4~ aey~ ~hiS Dee~a~atiee sha~ eeet~e~,~ eeee appweved~ the des~awatien ef seveRaRtsT seedirises and weStw~et~ens sha;~ be weeewded at tke same ~ime ~kat the ~ina~ map 4s weee~ded, (Deleted - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Office of the County Counsel: 1} A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and 2) A sample document conveying title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference. The declaration of covenants,- conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall (a} provide for a minimum term of 60 years, {b) provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit,' (c) provide for ownership of the common area by either the property owners' association or the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common and (d) contain the following provisions verbatim: 'Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provision shall apply: The Property owners' ;~;.~cato~io~ estab hed herein shall manage and continuously manrain ~re particularly described as lots A through V on Vesting mract Nap No. 24135 Mended No. I attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common area', or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining the 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135, Aim:l. tl Conditions of Approval Page 6 22. property of any such owner who defaults tn the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment 1ten, once created, shall be prior to all other 1tens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment 1ten. Thls Declaration shall not be temtnated, 'substantially' amended or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior wrttten consent of the Planning Dtrector of the County of RIverside or the County's successor-In-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' tf It affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the acommon area*. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules and regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control." Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final map is recorded. {Added - Planning Commission - April 12, lg8g} The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping conditions: 1) Prior to recordatlon of the final map the developer shall file an application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a parkway maintenance district for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24135 Amended No. I in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance district. 2) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible fomat suitable for permanent filing with the County Road Department. 3) The developer shall post a landscape perromance bond which shall be released concurrently with the release of subdivision perfomance bonds, guaranteetng the vtablllty of all landscaping which will be Installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by the district. 4) The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees, shall be respenstble for all parkway landscaping maintenance until such ttme as maintenance ts taken over by the district. 5) The developer shall comply with the standards and exhibits in Specific PlanNo. 219. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. tl Conditions of Approval Page 7 The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and t rrlgatton systems until such ttme as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planntng DIrector, Street 11ghts shall beprovtded wrlthtn the subdivision tn accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following: 1) Concurrently with the ftltng of subdivision Improvement plans with the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer and then from the appropriate uttltty purveyor. 2) Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an application with LAFCO for the formation of a street lighting district, or annexation to an existing lighting district, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. 3) Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall secure conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. 4) All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet '(ECS) shall be prepared. in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following. note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: 'County Slope Stability Report No, 89 was prepared for this property and is on ftle at the RIverside County Planning Department. Speclftc ttems of concern in the report are as follows: slope stability.' Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERNITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 8 at P~oF ~e lhe 4ssuaese of g;ad~e9 FeeR~s~ (he aFp~.ae~ ska~ ebta~R e~eapaRee ~wem the ~v~, F&sh and ~d~fe Sffv~ee, pe;a~e§ So the eN~skenee e~ ~ke B~epheRSA Kanga~ee aa~ e~e, (Deleted - Plannin~ Commission - April 12, 2989) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 633, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Prior to the issuance of g~adin9 bull ding permits detailed common open space area .landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) 1. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation· 2. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth berming, ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amenities where appropriate as approved by the Planning Department. 5. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of interior streets and project perkways due to insufficient road right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-way. 7. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, And. el Condlttoms of Approval Page 9 de All extsttng spectmen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the subject property shall be shown on the project's gradtng plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained. 9. All trees shall be minimum double stake, growing trees shall be steel staked, Weaker and/or slow 10, .The plans shall confom to those shown in Specific Plan No, 219, Any oak trees removed with four (4) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be replaced on a ten (10) to one (1) basis as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. The following tree preservation guidelines shall the projects approved grading, building and appropriate: be incorporated in landscaping plans as Every effort shall be made to prevent encroachment of structures, grading or trenching within the driplineor twenty-five (25} feet of the trunk of any trees, whichever is greater. 5 If encroachment within the dripline is unavoidable, no more than one third of the root area shall be disturbed, graded or covered with impervious materials. The root area is considered to extend beyond the dripline a distance equal to one half the radius. Building, grading or improvements shall not occur within ten {10} feet of any tree trunk. Retaining walls shall be constructed where necessary to preserve natural grade at least one-half the distance between the trunk and the dripline. Walls shall be designed with a post or caisson footing rather than a continuous footing to minimize root damage. Alteration of natural drainage shall be avoided to the greatest extent possible. Runoff channelled near trees shall not substantially change normal soil moisture characteristics on a seasonal basis. Runoff shall not be directed towards the base of trees so that the base of the trees remain in wet soil for an extended period. Where natural topography has been altered, drainage away from trunks shall be provided where necessary to ensure that water will not stand at the. crown. TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135,/rod. ll Conditions of Approval Page 10 0. Sedtmentatton and stltatton in the drainage ways shall be controlled where necessary to avoid filling around the base of the trees. Land uses that would cause excessive soil compaction within the dripline of trees shall be avoided. If the areas are planned for recreation, provide trails to restrict compaction to a small area. Heavy use under trees shall be avoided unless measures to minimize compactton are undertaken. Landscaping or irrigation shall not be installed within ten (10) feet of any trees. All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans· All approved grading and building plans shall reflect the utilization of post and beam foundations or the appropriate combination of split level pads and post and beam foundations when development is proposed on natural slopes of fifteen percent or greater measured over a horizontal distance of thirty {30) feet. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed gradi'ng plans for individual phases of development.and shall include the following: 1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion sedimentation during and after the grading process. and 2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through March 3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations 4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase Driveways shall be designed so as not to exceed a fifteen (15) percent grade. Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by TENTATIVE TRACT ]10. 24135, AIM, Conditions of Approval Page 11 an appropriate combination of a spectal terracing (benchtng) plan, increased slope ratio (t.e., 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planttrig combtried with Irrigation. Al1 driveways shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade· All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceeding ten (%0) feet in vertical height shall be contour-graded incorporating the following grading techniques: 1) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain, 2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain, 3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding. 4) Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous, undulating fashion. Natural features such as water courses, specimen trees and significant rock outcrops shall be protected in the siting of individual building pads on final grading plans· me Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redtrect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERNITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1) The project shall comply with the requirements of Development Agreement No. 4. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, lad. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 12 28. 2) 3) Prtor to the submittal of butldtng plans to the Department of Building and Safety an acoustical study shall be performed by an acoustical engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be applted to Individual dwe111ng untts withtn the subdivision to reduce ambtent tritertot notse levels to 45 Ldn. Prt~r to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval. landscaping and irrigation to be t n u g, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard landscaping per the requirements of Specific Plan No. 219. 4) All dwellings to be constructed within this subdivision shall be designed and constructed with fire retardant (Class B) roofs as approved by the County Fire Hatshal. s) 6) Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from view of surrounding property. 7) Building separation between all buildings excluding fireplaces shall not be less than ten (10) feet. 8) All street side yard setbacks sha)l be a minimum of ten (10) feet. All front yards Shall be provided with landscaping and automatic irrigation. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERHITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1) Wall and/or fence locations and materials shall conform to the approved wall and fence treatment plan in Spectftc Plan No. 219. 2) 3) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by a Planning Department field i nspecti on. TEHTAT/VE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. 11 Coedtttoes of Approval Page 13 29. 4) Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical study ts required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where applicable. s) Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and Spectflc Plan No. 219.. 6) Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Spectflc Plan No. 219 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the subdivider shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning Director of the County of Riverside demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval and mitigation measures of this map and E.A. No. 33434 which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Planning Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. {Added - Planning Commission - April 12, lgB9) CO :cj :gs OFFICE OF lOAD COMMISSIONEi~ & COUNTY $URVEYOe Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon ~treet Riverside, CA 92501 April 12, 1989 MaPeh-&r-l~89 COb*NTY ADNENb'TBAI~.~ CL'ViT_q NAILING 4JX)RC.~ leo BOx mOeO JU~. CAUrOR.*mLA 12502 (? |4# 78?-6554 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: TR 24135 - Amend ~1 Schedule A - Team SP - SMD#9 *As Amended at P.C. 4-12-89 With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative ~ correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easement traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Commissioner's Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i,e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/ or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows: 'Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as approved by the Road Department. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by.the Road Department. TR 2~135 - Amend tl ~l~e4,el~-6~-l~Je~ April 12, 1989 ~e 2 Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department. Street "M" shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 100, (84'/108' as approved by th~ Road Commissioner). Streets "B", "P", "L" (north of Stree~ "N"), and Street "E" (at Pio Pico Road) shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 104, Section A. (50'/70' with entry median as approved by the Road Commissioner). The remaining interior streets shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (40'/60') Margarita Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 55 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 100. Street "A" shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of. way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 103, Section A. (24'/33', as approved by the Road Commisioner) Pio Pico Road shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/33') Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication· Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for main- tenance by County. TR 24135 - Amend ~1 ~a~4~(~-4989 April 12, 1989 Page 3 14. 15. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and off-set cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throughout the landdivision. Aspbaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. The landdivider will provide left turn lanes on Pio Pico Road and Street "A' at all interior intersections as approved by the Road Department. The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho California Water District prior to the recordation of the final map. The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance with County Standard #114 of Ordinance 461. All centerline intersections shall be at 90' with a minimum/ 5~ ~ent m~as~ed from flow line~ ~ r2C. rr , ~, ,',~. ~ . Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk). The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be 35 feet. All driveways-shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. A minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be constructed between driveways. The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face of curb. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, a written agreement may be entered into with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817. TR 24~5 - Amend #1 ,Mzrc/a-t~-~eie April 12, 1989 Pa.~e 4 24. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Lot access shall be restricted on Margarita Road, Street "M". Plo Pico Road, and Street "a' and so noted on the final map. Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of s16pe, a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road Commissioner. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with Specific Plan No. 219. Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a "Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with Governmental Code Section 56000. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads constructed or improved within the subdivision. The county Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the subdivision is within an existing assessment district. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a County Service Area in accordance with Governmental Code Section 25210.1. All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the street improvement plans. A striping plan is required for Margarita Road, Pio Pico Road, Street "M' and Street "A". The removal of the existing striping shall be the responsibility of applicant. 'Traffic signing and striping shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs borne by the applicant. Should this' project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. TR 24135 - Amend fi -lsrg~-6~-aQ89 April 12, 1989 Page 5 The following conditions from Specific Plan No. 219 - Vail Meadows shall also apply: All road improvements, unless otherwise noted, shall be constructed to ultiEate County Standards in accordance with Ordinance No. 460 and 461 as a requirement of the implementing subdivisions for the Specific Plan, subject ~o approval by the Road Commissioner. The proposed "Gateway Road' is approved, in concept, subject to the submittal and r~view of design details. Any .landscaping within public road rights of way will require approval by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing maintenance through the establishment of a landscape maintenance district or similar mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. The Rancho Villages Assessment is an integral component of the planning for this area. Prior to the recordation of tract maps within this specific plan or any other project located within the assessment district, the final actions necessary for formation of the district must be completed. Should the district fail, the project proponent shall, prior to the recordation of any tract maps within =he specific plan boundaries, provide for road improvements in accordance with Table XV-Implementa=ion Schedule for On- Site Roadway Improvements and Table XVI-Implementa=ion Schedule for Off-Site ~oadway Improvements, as attached. In response to the concerns voiced by Caltrans relative to cumulative impacts indicating the need to implemen~ demand management strategies and/or provide for the development of additional highway corridors, the project proponent has agreed to fund such a study. to be conducted under the direction of the Road Department as prescribed by Caltrans. The study is currently in progress. Very truly yours Elmer Baumgarten Subdivision Engineer ' EB:Jw ', _0(' :OII ' ............. ' ood ~',33;::) lee ~ ' :::) ;::) :::) ::). ~) -)')OO County of Riverside TO: FROM: RE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: February · '~ HEALTH SPECIALIST IV 'tRACT ~ 2zd35, Amended No, 1 27, 1989 Environmental Health Services has reviewed Amended No. 1 dated February 23,198~Our current c~ents will remain as stated ~n our letterdated January 11, 1989. SM:tac GiN. fORM 4, (Pay. 8/87) ta.&~tmm~teJu~ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT January 11. 1989 of HEALTH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLANNING DEPT. 4080 Lemon SCreeE Riverside, CA 92502 ATTN: Chris Ormsby RE: TRACT NAP 24135: Parcels 8 and 9 of Parcel Map 23432 (325 Lots) aaltALTli 8iJllllliB IAMMmNG. CA 92220 H3 geO41TM ~IIIC)ADWAY k~THE. CA 12225 {,iBa ILAIC:A 7&qaO MARGUERITA (liVERSIDE, CA 12JO4 {~OlIOl A COrOnA, CA NORTH STATE I, tEM;:T. CA 12343 Iml, IO 4l-~01 OASIS IT~EET INDIO. CA 92201 &.ALE leOliNE 3Oll5 FRASER D41. LAtE ELIaNOdlE. CA. IPgllll NORTH V 8TNEET F'EPmIS, GA IllTO 1At0 L~ND[il ITllEET IIVERSiD;'. CA. II&OT frill MISSION Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has revieved Tentative Map No. 24135 and recommends Chat: A water system shall be installed according Co plans and specifications as approved by the va~er company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of =he wa~er system shall be submitted in triplicate, vi=h a minimum scale noC less than one inch equals 200 feet, along wi=h the original drawing Co the Coun=y Surveyor. The prints shall shov the internal pipe diameter, loca=ion of valves and fire hydran=s; pipe and Joint specifics=ions, and the size of =he main a= the Junction of the new system co ~he existing sys=em. The plans shall comply in all respects wi=h Div. 5, Par= 1. Chap=st 7 of the California Health and Safer7 Code, CaliforniaAdminisCra~ive Code, Title 22, Chap=st 16, and General Order No. 103 of =he Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans-shall be siZned by a registered engineer and wa=er company with the following certification: "I certify Cba= the desiWn of the water system in Trace Map 24135 is in accordance with the waC;r system expansion plans of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Hater District and tha= the water service, storage and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service.to such trace. This certification does no~ conscience a guarantee cha~ it wi11 supply racer co such trace a~ any specific quanciCies,.flows or pressures for fire pro=ec=ion or any ocher purpose". This cercifica=ion shall be siSned.by a responsible official of the water company. The plans mus= be submitted Co the Coun=y Surveyor's Office co review a= lease ~wo weeks prior to the reques= for Ehe recordscion of the final map. Riverside County Planning Dept. Page Two ATTN: Chris Ormsby January 11, 1989 This Department has a statenent from the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District agreeing to servedom~stic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on denand, providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This Department has a statement from the Elsinore Valley Municipal Wa[er District agreeing to alloy the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the seers of the District. The sever sTstem shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sever s~stem shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diemeter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and Joint specifications and the size of the severs at the Junction of the new system to the existing s~stem. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be siSned by a registered engineer and the sever district with the following certification: 'I certify that the design of the sewer s~stem in Tract Map 24135 is in accordance with the sewer s~stem expansion plans of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed tract". The plans must be submitted to the County Surve~or's Office to review at least t~o weeks prior to the request for ~he recordation of the final map. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to recordation of the final map. Sincerely, Environmental Health Services SN: tac ,e 4&209 OMb SUa~ Suite 405 Imago, CA 92201 (6 ! 9) :}42*8886 RIVI]L%'IDE COUNTY rIP, E DEPARllv[D4T IN ~11ON WITH 11-1E CAUFORN~ DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY FIE PROTECTION A~GEN j. NEkTk~N 2-26-89 4080LemonSteer. Suite 111. Rh~r~k, CA 92501 (714) 787-6606 TO: ATTN: RE: PLANNING DEPARTHENT CHRIS OPa~SBY TRACT 24135 -AMENDED #1 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Flre Department recommends the followinE fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard *fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2½") located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be stgned/approved by a registered Civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA The land division is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" of Riverside County as shown on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Any building constructed on lots created by this land division shall comply with the special construction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance 546. All road medians to be set back 30 feet from curb line at all intersections. SubJecc: Tracc 24135 Page 2 All buildings shall be consCructed with fire reCardanc roofing macerial as described in Section 3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any vood shingles or shakes shall have a Class "B" ratinS and shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installacion. MITIGATION Prior to the recordaCion of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 p&r lot/unit as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose co defer the time of payment, h~/she may enter into a vricten agreement rich ~he County deferring said payment Co the time of issuance of the firs~ buLlding permit. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning and Engineering scarf. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Kurt Mantwell, Fire Safety Specialist ama KENNi""rH L.. EDWARDI Illl MARKIT ITIRKIT I·. 0. BOX loll TILlPHONE (714) 7 18 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT IllVllillDs', CALIFORNIA lel0Z March 27, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California AttentioA= specific Plan section Chris Ormsby Ladies and Gentlemen= Re: Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No. 1 This is a proposal to divide about 83 acres in the Rancho Cal- ifornia area. The site is to the north of Highway 79 between Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road. This project is a part of Specific Plan 219, Vail Meadows. The area consists of well defined ridges and natural watercourses which traverse this property. Local offsite flows are tributary to the site's northeast and southeast boundaries. A storm drain is proposed along Pio Pico Road to collect the flows from the southeast. This storm drain would be connected to an existing 120-inch diameter storm drain across the school site to the southeast as shown on the Exhibit B- Another storm drain is pro- posed across the middle of this property. This storm drain would discharge the flows into two existing 42-inch diameter culverts under Margarita Road as shown on the tentative map. Onsite flows and other local offsite flows.would be conveyed with streets and the above two storm drains. Following are the District:s recommendations: The 100 year offsite tributary flows should be collected and safely conveyed through the site to an adequate outlet. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right of way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating, sDrainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions'. Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the affected property owners. The documents should be recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to recordation of the final map. Riverside County Planning Department Rez Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No. i -2- March 27, 1989 All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street or an adequate outlet. The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained within the street right of way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities should be installed. Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows· Additional emergency escape should also be provided· The property's street and lot grading should be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a drainage easement should be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or di- verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the District for review prior to the recordation of the final map. Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition of debris onto downstream properties or drainage facilities. Development of this property should be coordinated with the development of adjacent properties to ensure that watercourses.remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not diverted from one watershed to another. This may require the construction of temporary drainage facilities or offsite construction and grading. A portion of the proposed project is in a floodplain and may affect 'waters of the United States', 'wetlands' or 'Jurisdictional streambeds',-therefore, An accordance with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts 59 through 73) and County Ordinance No. 458~ A copy of appropriate correspondence and necessary permits from those government agencies from which approval As required by Federal or State law (such as Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Department of Fish and Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to the District prior to the final District approval of the project· Riverside County Planning Department Re= Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No. I -3- March 27, 1989 Major flood control facilities are being proposed. These should be designed and constructed to District standards including those related to alignment and access to both inlets and outlets. The applicant should consult the District early in the design process regarding materials, hydraulic design and transfer of rights of way. 2e All flood control facilities should be constructed to District standards. And all facilities that the District will assume for maintenance will require the payment of a one time maintenance charge equal to the epresent worthm of maintenance costs from the time of acceptance through 1998. 13. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the District via the Road Department for review and approval prior to recordation of the final map. Grading plans should be approved prior to issuance of grading permits. Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Chiang of this office at 714/787-2333- Very truly yours, Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates KENNETH L. EDWARDS RC=pln January 18,. 1989 Administrative Center, 1777. Atlanta Avenue Riverside. CA 92507 Riverside County Planning .Department Attentio~z Ron Goldman County Administrative Center' 4080 Lemon Street. Riverside, CA 92501. Vesting Tract 24135 Ladies and Gentlemen= The Land Use Division ~f the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and'off- site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348. Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B, per Ordinance 655. Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side'yard setback. Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum 5' side yard setback. Very truly yours, Thomas H. Ingram, Director DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020 ~IAI~E OF CAUFC~NIA--IUSIN~,, ltANStQRTA/ION AND NOUSlNG AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DeS/taCT I, P.O. IOX 231 I,~N laeNAaI:NNO, CA 12402 January 3, 1989 JAN 6 Development Review 08-Riv-T9-17.376 Your Reference: VT 2q135 Planning Department Attention Nr. Chri80rmsby County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Hr. Ormsby: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Vesting Tract 2q135 located adjacent to Margarita Road and north of Pio Pico Road in Raneho California. Please refer to the attached Development Review Form which documents Caltrans' requirements for this project. Conformance with these conditions is required for issuance of an Encroachment Permit. If any work is necessary within the state highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Thomas J. Neville at (71q) 383-q38q. Very truly yours, .~N. LEWANDOWSKI District Permits Engineer Art. ( Your Reference) Plan Checker WE WOULD LIKE TO MOTE: REVIEW FORM l~te (Co Rte PM) limen plans are submitted, please conform to the requirements of the attached wHandout". This will expedite the review process and time required for Plan Check. Although the traffic and drainage geerated by this proposal do not appear to have a significant effect on the state highway system, consideration must be given to the eu~ulative effect of continued developuent in this area. Any measures necessary to mitigate the mxuulative impact of traffic and drainage shall be provided prior to or with development of the area that necessitates them. L,/ It appears that the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal could have a significant effect on the state highway system of the area. Any measures necess~-ry to mitigate the traffic and drairmge impacts shall be included with the development. This portion of state highway is included in the California Master Plan of State Highways Eligible for Official Scenic Highway Designation, and in the future your agency may wish to have this route officially designated as a state scenic high',~y. This portion of state highway has been officially designated as a state scenic highway, and develolxnent in this corridor should be compatible with the scenic highway concept. ~/' It is recognized that there is considerable public concern about noise levels adjacent to heavily %~veled highways. Land development, in order to be compatible with this concern, my require special noise attenuat~un measures. Develo~xnent of property should include any necessary noise attenuation. WE REQUEST THAT TPZ ITEMS CHECMED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: Normal right of way dedication to provide __ half-width on the state highway. Normal street improvsnents to provide__ half-width on the state highw?y. Curb and gutter, State Standard__ along the state highly. Parking shall be prohibited along the state high~y by painting the curb red and/or by the proper placement of "no parking" signs. radius curb returns be provided at intersections with the state high~y. ]'~ndard wheelchair ranp must be provided in t.he returns. A positive vehicular barrier along the property frontage shall be provided to limit physical access to the state highway. Vehicular m~ess shall not be developed directly to the state. highway. Vehicular meccas to the state highway shall be provided by existing public road connections. Vehicular access to the state .~..y shall be provided by standard __ driveways. .-. Vehicular access shall not. be provided within __ of ~he intersection at Vehicular access to the state highway shall be provided by a road-type comnection. Form 8-PD19 (Rev. 5187) ",Continued on reverse) Date: January 3, 198~ R~u- 7~-'7'~7G (Co-Rte-PMj (Your Reference) ADDITIONAL~OMMENTS: Due to magnztude of this proposal and the constructlcn exp!os;on (residential, commercial), the contract should contrlbu~e to all Sta~e Hlghway improvements necessary *o maln~aln ~e exlstlnc trafflc patterns. In additlon, ~ appears =hal this development Ranchc V~!lage Assessmen~ DlszrlcZ and ~herefcre reccmmeni owner par~Ic2p~e in the assessments for ~he Vehicular access connectjons shall be paved at least within the slate highway right oF ~r~y. Access points to the state highway shall be developed in a manner that will provide sight distance for __ mph along the state highway. Landscaping along the state highway shall be low and forgiving in nature. A left-turn lane, ineludi~E any necessary kridening, shall be provided on the state highway at · - Consideration shall be given to the provision, or future provision, of signalization and lighting of t.he intersection of ~Pe ~Nei 'r~ Q~ and the state. highway. A traffic study indicating on- and off-site flow patterns'and volt~nes, probable impacts, and proposed mitigation measures shall be prepared. Adequate'off-street parking, k~lich does not reqdire backing onto the state highway, shall be provided. Parking lot shall be developed in a manner that will net cause any vehicul~-r movenent conflicts, including parkinE stall entrance and exit, within of the entrance from the state highway. Handicap parking shall not be developed in the busy driveway entrance area. Care shall be taken when developinE this property to preserve and perpetuate the existin~ drainage pattern of the state highway. Particular consideration should be given to cumulative increased storm runoff to insure that a highway drainage ,//~Anoblem is not created. y necessary noise ~.t. tenuation shall be provided' as part of the development of this property. ./Please refer to attachec additional comments. WE REQUEST: A copy of any conditions of approval or revised approval. ~/" A copy of any doeu. ents providing additional state highway right of way upon recordation of the map. WE REQUEST THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW DURING THE APPROVAL PROCESS: Any proposals to further develop this property, A copy of the traffic or enviromnental study, 1_/I check print of the Parcel or .Tract Map, -V~ A check print of the Plans. for any improv~nents within the state highway right of check print of the GradinE and lrainaEe Plans for this property when available. ]~ast~rn ~V~u n jc' D. jkmcs laulldm ~w~ eM S~nill R~ve~s~de C~. Plann~n~ Dept. 4080 Lemon St.. 9th FloOr R~ers~de,' ~a 92~01 The District is responding to your request for comments on the subject project relative to water and/or sewer service. The items checked below apply to this project review. The subject project: / Is not within EMWD's: water service area sewer service area -///Will be required to construct/provide the following facilities if to be served by ENWD: I I !~ewer Service Any and all necessary regionally sized onsite and offsite gravity sewers and appurtenant works that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers, treatment, and,effluent disposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EMWD regulations will be allowed. ~;,~.~,,.,~., ~.p,,.,.,.,t, .~ .cc,.,,.. E..jz.. ~,-.,-~ e ~e - sD ~ "7 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Planning Department 2045 S. San Jacinto Street · Post Office B,~x g.~00 · Son Jacintt,. California 92.~B)-1500 · Telephc,ne ¢714) 925-7676 January 17, 1989 Board of Directors: Richard D. 8teffeX President aames A. Dsrby St. Vice President Ralph Daily DouZ KulberZ Jon A. Lundin Jeffrey L Minitier T. C. Rowe Officers: Start T. Mills General Manager Phillip L Forbes D=ecwr of Finance- Treasurer Thomas E MeA!iester Director of Operstions & Maintenance Doris V, BakeF Distric~ SecTetary McCormick a Kidman LeStl Counsel Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor Riverside, California 92501-3657 Subject: Water Availability Reference: Vesting Tract 24135 Gentlemen: Please be advised that 'the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have anyquestions, please contact Senga Doherty at (714) 676-4101. F012/dptlSf Very truly yours, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Bob Lemons, P, E, Acting Director of Engineering RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT 28061 DIAZ ROAD · POST OFFICE BOX 174 · TRMECULA, CA 92390-0174 * (714) 676-4101 · FAX (714) 676-0615 UNITED STATES POST OFFICE DATE: OUR REF: SUBJECT: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO: · · RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4080 LEMON ST., 9thFLOOR. RIVER. SIDE, CA 92501 FUTURE MODE OF DELIVERY: CENTRALIZED CONTACT WITH THE U. S. POSTAL SERVICE IS REQUIRED BY DEVELOPER/BUILDER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION FOR DELIVERY TYPE AND LOCATIONS. DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR Southern Callfornim Edison Company P. O. BOx 410 IOO LONG BEACH BOULEVARD ~ONG BEACH. ~AUF~N~ IOIOt Riverside County Road Department P. O. Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Attention: Subdivision Section SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24135 I'TL.~PNONI January 20. 1989 Please be advised that the division of the property shown on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24135 will not unreasonably interfere with the ~ree and complete exercise of any easement(s) held by Southern Cali~ornia Edison Company within the boundaries of said vesting tentative tract map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights. title and interest in and to said easement(s), nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of any costs for teloration of affected facilities. In the event that the development requires Eeloration of facil- ities. if any, on the subject property by right of easement or otherwise, the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost of such relocation and provide Edison with suitable replacement rights, Such costs and replacement rights are required prior to the performance or the teloration. If additional information is required in connection with the above aentioned subject, please call Dennis C. Bazant at (213) 491-2644. DCB/bjw 16160-24WPC Very truly yours. co,' :IiVE )ibE COUntY PLAnninG DEPA CnI lC DATE: December 28, 1988 TO: Assessor Butldtng and Safety Surveyor - Dave Duda Road Department Health - Ralph Luchs Ftre Protection Flood Control Dtstrtct Fish & Game U.S. Postal Servtce- Ruth E. Davtdson U.S. Ftsh& Wtldltfe Servtces COJ~ZSSZdNER WALT ABRAHAH RIVERS/DE COUNTY PARKS EASTERN tt. JN]CZPAL WATER COHPANY RANClIO CALIF WATER CONPANY SO CALZF EDISON SO CALIF GAS COHPANY GENERAL TELEPHONE CAL TRANS t8 ELS INORE UNIFI~'~CH~~T~]C3;.; TENECULA UNION SCli00L DISTRICT VESTING TRACT 24135 - (Sp Pl) - E.A. 33434 - Bedford Properties - Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoc. - Rancho California Area - First Supervisorial District - Adjacent to 94argarita, N. of Pio Plco Road - SP Zone - 83.5 Acres into 325 lots - Schedule A - No Waiver - Nod 118 - A.P. 923-230-002 Please revtew the case described above, along wtth the attached case map. A Land Division Connittee meeting has been tentathely scheduled for January23, 1989. if it clears, it w111 then go to publlc hearing. Your co~nents and recomendattons are requested prior to January23, 19C9 in order that we.my fnclude the in the staff report for this'particular case. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact Chrts 0rmsby at 787-1363. Planner CONNENTS: The Elsinore Union High School District facilities are overcrowded and our educaUonal programs seriously impacted by increasing student population caused by new residential, conwnercial and industrial construction. Therefore, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53080 of AB 2926 and SB 327, this district levies a fee against all new development projects within its boundaries. DATE: 114/89 SIGNATURE PLEASE print name and title Dr. Larry Maw, Superintendent 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 ~~1 I NTB. - D · lEA I1 TM · NTAL LIETTB I11 ,,s, :2 NTY OF FIIVEFIIIDE U February 9, 1989RNE __.J: _ TO: Chr~s Oresby, Planner, County Planning IRON: Harc Brewer, Assistant Park Planner, County Park~~;~ SUBJECT: Tentative Tracts: 24131, 24132, 24134, 24135, 24136, 24137 Vat1Neadows SP 219/EIR 235 The RIverside County Parks Department appreciates the opportunity to revtew the above referenced and offers the following co,lnents: Parks and Recreations The Development of the proposed tracts wtll have mtntmal tmpact on extsting regtonal park facilities. The County Parks Department also has a county-wide recreation trat1 system. As Indicated by thts departaent's response to S.P. 219/EZR 235, Ha~ 25, 1988 and the Planntng Department's conditions of approval October 4, 1988, the developer was to profide recreation tratls along the south stde of the Pauba Road rtght-of-ny and along the north stde of the De Portola Road right-of-way. The latter ts to cross De Portola Road at the development's western most boundary, follow the bound~ry due south and extt the stte tnto prtvate property to the vest. Tentative tracts 24132 and 24134 wtll tapact the Pauba Road recreation trat1 and tentative tracts 24136 and 24137 wtll tapact De Portola Road Trat1. The above eentloned tracts make no reference to tratls or trat1 easements. The Parks Department vtll 'requtre these trat1 locations to be shown on all tract maps and that they be graded tn an acceptable manner. The Parks Department also requests that tt be 11sted as clearance agency for maps and gradtrig planntngs dealtrig vtth thts project. Cultural and Htstortc Resources _lentalive iract 24131, Z4]32, Z4134, 24135: CondttlonaT approval ts granted for T.T. 24131, 24132, 24134, regard to Cultural and Htstorlc Resources only. and 24135 vtth Conditions for Approval: Should any prehistoric or htstortc resources be discovered or uncovered during the gradtrig process, ell ~ork tn that area will cease unttl the resource is evaluated by an archaeologist, or historian and etttgatton ts determined and approved by the History Dtv~ston of the RIverside Count~ Parks Department and the Archaeological Research Untt, University of California, Riverside. Tentative Tract 24136: Conditional approval ts granted for T.T. 24136. Conditions for Approval: At the ttee of the altgneent of De PotCola Road the historic. resource Rh-3390-H ~as not knevn. Thts stte was found as a result of the Htstor~ Dtvtston's ortgtnal mitigation for conditional approval of the EZR 1219 (Hay 25 1988). Although Rh-3390-H fs located south and east of T.T.24136, the realignment of De Potrole Road must be resolved before final approval of this T.T.24136 ts given by the Htstor~ Division. Tentative Tract 24137: Conditional Approval ts granted for T.T.24137. Conditions for Approval: Street "A", ~htch cuts south and east off De Potrole Road, should not be cut or graded, etc., unttl mitigation b~ data collection fs completed for Rtv-1728, Rtv-1729 and Rtv-3391-H. The road wtll tmpact all three of these sites at present. Any ~ork in T.T.24137 must avoid parcel t6 and Rtv-1728 unttl all archaeological work ts completed tn that area. The use of heav~ equipment anJNhere south of De Potrole Road must be avoided unttl all archaeological york ts completed and protective measures are taken to ensure the safeti and future existence of the cultural and htstortc resources tn that area. Protective measures should constst of fenctng around Rtv-3390-H, betng sure not to allow fencing t~o ~Oa~:CtR I~" Stta. All mayable surface historic resources south of De r o should be photographed, recorded and mpped, after ~htch, they Bay be meved wtthfn the fenced area at Rtv-3390-H. Hmever, the project archaeologist mst dtrect and supervise the movement and placement of these resources to Rh-3390-H to meke sure thetr placeEent wtll not tmpact the stte. Although T.T.24137 ts west of Rtv-3391)-H, the reallgneent of De Potrole Road EUSt be resolved and the above conditions met before ftnal approval ts granted to the Htstory Dhtston. m/KN/0376S DIIIAIITMINTAL COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PLANNZNG DEPARTNENT ~lanuary 31, 1989 TO: ~hrts Ormsby -Spectfic Plans FRON: Steven A. Kupferman, Engineering Geologist z~ RE: Tentative Tract 24135 Slope Stability Report No. 89 The following report has been revtewed relattve to slope stability at the subject site: · Slope Stability Analysts, Tentative Tract 24135, The Meadows at RanchO Callfornta~ Rancho California, CA," by Converse Consultants,.dated December 5, 1988. Thts report determined that: 1. All slopes proposed for the subject tract at or below a hetght of 35 feet will be grossly stable. 2. Both cut and fill slopes have a htgh potential for erosion of sandy materials and resultant surftclal Instability. 3. Low strength parameters extst for claystones and siltstones. Thts report recommended that: 1. Geologtc Inspection of all cut slopes should be-conducted during grading. 2. Buttress ftlls my be requtred for cut slopes vtth adverse mtertals or conditions. Proposed slopes at the stte should be planted soon after construction and r111 requtre mtntenance to perform tn a satisfactory manner through ttme, Thts report sattsfies the General Plan requtrenent for a slope stability report. The recommendations tn thts report shall be adhered to tn the destgn and construction of thts project. SAK: rd RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLAP, AT]ON AND NOTICE OF DETERMINATXON EA No. ~3,/~ '7 NEGATXVE DECLARAT/ON Based on the initial Study, it has been determined that the proposed project will not have,a significant environmental effect· PROOECT DESCR/P. TION AND LOCAT/ON: 8me att~zo~d Z~f,t(4zZ S~u~!~ Roger S. Streeter, Planntng Dtrector C~PL~ED ~te ~-~- ~ . ~ Case No.(Id) ~ ,~/~ ~ ~ Land Dtv Sch Appl/Rep x. ~ ~velopable Lots ~?_-?~, ~ Open Space Lots Date Submitted Existing Zones 5P Changes of Proeosed Zones Only Zoning Acreage ADOPTED [:] Bpard of Supervisors Ei~lanning'Convnission Area Planning Council D F1TRning Director (Other) Title Dev. Ac O.Sp. Ac NOTICE OF DETERHINATION HEARING BODY OR OFFICER lard of Supervisors anning Con~nission C) Area Planning Council DPli~ning Director D (Other) ACTION ON PROJECT g~/~proval Ig Disapproval Date Developable Lots z~ZS' Dev.Ac Open Space Lots /~ O.Sp. Ac Changes of APProvedI ~~1 Zones Only Zones Acreage ~ The project will not have a significant effect on the environment end a Negative Declaration Person verifying i I ~ Title P/~,/y¢//~ 7/7' RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4080 LIEHON STREET, 9TH FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 lrt, Whtt. e Oftlint1 - Consky CXe2'k 2ha Canary - r4ee letl.e 295-3] (lev. 10183) COUNTY STAMP ......... qEVE:LI iDE count.u -FLAnn;ne DEPA:IClilERC ENVIRONMENTAL ABBEBBMENT FORM: ~~Ik'~UENTf. A.)IIJ~ 33434 t~i:)JE~'T~))NCM,IdBEllB(m) Vestinq Tract 24135 Bedford Propoerties NAME OFpIEFIBONImj~E~Chris 0rmsby, Planner III L ImRC)JECT IIFORMAI'ION ITANDARD EVALUATION MODULE NUMBER(m): ~ 1 ~ IlF. SCRIFq'10N(In~.~;;mmdmln~lmmizemndumesmmmk~¢~ic~): The site is located within approved Specific Plan No. 21g. ~ I~TAL PROJECT/~ ACRES R3. ~ ~ ~_~J:~qC)R$ PARCEL NO4m~. 923-230-002 D. EXISTING ZONING: SP IS THEPROPOSAL. INCONFORMANCE? E- PROPOSED~)NTNG: IS THEPROPOS~INCONFORMANCE? F. S1REETREFIEREN) The site is located East of Margarita Rd.. in fhp WP~fprn portion Of Specific Plan No. 219. ~IECTIO N, ~IP, lLa3~ ~PTK N 0R AllACH A LEGAL. DESCRIPTION: Township 85, Range 2W IRIEF DEBClIql0N C)F ~ r,x~),~ EI/V~I/[hlTAL 8ElTli$ OF ~ FRCXECT SITE ~ ITS $UeRC)UNDING~ The site consists of rolling hills which have been tilled. The site is vacant at present. · ¢OMPREHENIVT GEIEMAL ImLJU40ImlN IllmACE _.AND CONSERVATION DEImGN&IION Chmm:kmhmmm2,mmmdmmXlm~bmkwmmd~w.r,,dmm~'. 13 M .r mmmt dtm mmm mmmm k In '.'~:p.~m Smm~ M' -mar or ~ vm~ C~munmty m~Arm'. ~8mcmmmmm E. W(lm mrm Cmy).Vmmm~ r'l almmrlmmldlmmpmzmimmlmlmln'mNothVmtmdmmC)PmnBm'. ComPlete~lll'N Ik. mmedDemM. VammmmVm. D AlorlwldtepmloclldklmmOIxmBimoilmdConmr41joncleedgnldj~~~"~~ eboet CompMU Socfmu E, IV(A.B. mdE on~V md VL B. ENVIRONMENTAL ~ AND MOURM ASIEIIMENT ~ (Cml Onl}. 111 &lc ,, "'o ~ il IIINly lO ~l_~l ,,,i:l I11 ~ lind ult lulll~ity rillfigs in ~lcti~n fiLE. NA - Nm A~prc-L,, Geared emem~ n0 ...t' n~, ~ I NomW-Low RSk I -l. ~i~e~y~v~r~N)~m~her~ny~r~r~.t~Jh~m1~nd/~r~mJme~uesmy~rd~nt~y~ect~r~~ kh~t.X f; Mlefk% .: I~ligllllllOllllllll:lllllllC~w.~m._r._r~livlO~lllPllfi. FOrlftyMlgeftslfke:fyeS(Y)write .wr'.llk,,- 'ama murm~ , c~e t ~,.,,ull~lndin~ollmc~andan~miOaGmmeuurmm~V. Aimo. m b~icatecl. ekm:lmS~m~i'_ ,4-: ~lmmmlmmmmullmlmilt~sm~oimm~ming{m). ¢~¢mdm~nlli~mlmn~flNmpmgm). IIAZARDS uslkSsnU n (Fk;.VL3) 4t~ A B C D (FiQ, W.11) ~ Zone (1rag. V1.1) 13.__N Railroad Noise (Fig. V1.13- Vt.16) (~ s Ps u n e='e. vt.4~ ,4.__Hi~) A · C D 3. ] ZB Gm~n_cls~akMg Zone (Fig Vt.1) Highway Noise (Fig. Vt.17 - Vt29) HA (~) PS U n mm.w-s~ ~ A · c D 4Y__ $12pes (Riv. Co. BOO Scale Slope &asps) 15. O4her Noise RY 11:). N 11-N LandsJhSeRiskZone~iv. Co. e0OScme Seisn~cMnorOn-sl~elnsl~) ~ S PS U R Rockfan H&zam (C)n.sl~ Inspsctjon) Expensive ,.qols fU.S.DA 8oil Conse~atim Service SoE Surveys) f.~ (U.S.I)~ Scdl Conserva~ Sefvk:sSoUSunsys) Wi'm:l E~&~cl(Fig. Vt.1, Ofd. 460. k142&Ord, 484) Dem lrmnddQ~Amm(FiO. VI.7) Fim~m lFig. VLT) (Fig. VLB) 12.. N NrpodNoiseFs0. n.18.S.n.18.11 & V!.12 & 1984 NCUZ Report, MAF.B.) NA A B C D (Fig, V1.11 ) 16. __N -Project GenerNecl Noise Affecting Noia~ Sensitive Uses (Fig. %/I.11) 17.__Y Noise Sertsitjve Pfojecl(Fig. Vl.11) 18.__Y Nr Ouadity !ml~ctm From Project Project Ser~itive to Air Quality Water QuaJity In;acts From Project Project Sensitive to Water Ouslity I. Isza~ous MatedaJs end Westes Hszerdous Fie Ass (Fig. VI.30 - VI.31 ) Other Other 19._N_ 20...J~L 21._,~L, 22,. N 23. __N 24.,, 25.__ 2'/__ In of Ikieaw an A6m4cdtuml Pmmmrve 80N lanmd~Fk;VL41-VL42) 21. N EmfgyRemameFk;VL4~-VL44) RESOURCES a4- N Arct,aec~logk.4f Resources FIO. VL22-Vt33&VL4S-Vt.48) Other Definmons for land Use kltabEIty end Noise Acceptability Ratings NA - NotAryk-~kde 8 - 6eemJly~%,~.rlm PS - Pmvtskx~llySultable U - GIIxelly Unllillde R - RelUk:led A - Generllly Acceptablfi l- Ck, dltk, ma!lyAmxm;mblm C - GINali~Ur-ccmp".hle D - Lend Use Discouraged 1. OFENSRIZ:EAND~ATIONMAPI)EBi)NATIOIM(m): Apprnv,d %pacific Plan l- I~LI~Im~MREk Southwest Territory Land Use Plann~n 4, I)DMMUiiqYPO~NIEA, IFANY: off Palomar 0bservatorv Street lighting Policies & COMMLNTYFtA~FANY: Southwest Area Plan (under study) I CCMI&NffYPLAN!~)XFANY: ?. 81j~I~i~AFFECTii~FRC)~The comprehensive policies and pro.iect desiqn component described in Specific Plan project. More specifically, the focus of the applicable policies is on Planning Area 17, which encompasses the entire ProPosal. Ire· ~11 r,,, ,_je -' , ink:k=te w~th · We (Y) m' no (N) whether mny public (r,,,Jlitie~ mncl/m men~ im&ue~ my mign ificmntJy Idtlct (~ be mffL'tmd by ibm pn:mpomad. i t.mfmrmn~mcl f~ are Gontminmd in the Ccxnprehmn~ General Rmn. r~ any irasue mmrkmcl yes (Y~ write elmtin mournram, mgmn:'-mm c~x~, fm~clings of ImcL rand nWtigmtion roeinsures uncler Sectjon V. PUBUC FACIUTIES AND SERVICES )N a'Y ll-v I~_Y 1LY__ lSY laJX_, Eclueetri~n Tails (Fit. NAg - IV.241 Riv. C~ e00 ScaJe Equesman Tail Uetee (r~g. N25. N26) Ltx'Mm (Rg. N.I? - N. le) / 5etvicee (Rg. N.17 - N.18) Nq~arl (Fig, ILl&2 - 1.18.4, ILIlJ - 1.11.10 1 N27 - N.,16) Dkamr Ps,_W' ,xt, mira C, leleletdlelm:imtlelnmledln'kgMgedMPle~'.'REl~P'or'Rart'hoVle~eCommurmYPoitY ~% mm4mne M lieell D. ~rp~rt~f~ep~d~e~n~A~n~t~:)e~me~~ee~r~ci~nc:~aC~mm~~~te OLeedOf~ 1. ~.. 3. 6 Ifld 7. Ccesi:dlle 4l ilE:f l 4. 6. 6 end 7 I it Is in · Community Pian. Cueent lind see g~ur. orA'bs) ear te die bead on eber~ ccnclltae~ tLe. ,,_lrdvr*el. or.,,,.,, s.,_'el. eec.) ~ kw:licmte imn~ ume type B. I D.1 ~ line D.2. d the ctlearme be .._131vecf st the n,.ak:p:.,~nt stage? 4. Commmmily Plato designmkmXs): 5. k te ;,.,_;ned project txx'i/ste~t with the policies ancl clesigritUs ol ire C, cw'rmmun~ Plan? InoL the p~-I:ger: ~ with existing ants i~r..aled Narrounclin9 land ties? 7. Beeecl ee Dim ifebl mbj~. k the ;.~i:~:!e: ~ with the Comprelereive Getera; Pta~? I ftmm~ ,. ~m ..r:l by ~ciion and lmue Numbe lhoee U'dlrdll)ing irecre's. er~'er E. l el er let el ee pmlect die Is M m Open 8pace end Corterv~_:;-'_~ dnigrmem, ccrn;ete the lollowing: fie m,-.~:mV mmlemem me~ eme m~m~ I nee. exDlek: Baeecl en this Inlld eludy. Is the I~;:;n: oc:ndeent eeh the Ccse~ciNt~ Gerera~ PSan? not. Jk ,_-;m by 6eclion end leaue Nun~e g~ee iesues ~lnUlyk~I kcc~.::s~eficies: I V- IIFORMATIC)N IOURCII, FINDINGI OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES ,A. AIO DrnONAL IFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ,e&'SF&.qMENT CAN BE COMPLETED: DATE DATE ADEOUACY IECTK)N/ ~ INR:)RMA'nON INFORMAnON ~ ISSUE NO. REQUIRED REQ4JESTF. D RECEIVED r/ZS,NO~)ATE), B- For each leawe mafkecl yes ('Y') under ~eclkml IIl.l end NJ, klenlffy b Section end blue number and do the kiowing, in~elormm~smbelow: 1. I.~ ell - :!.eftlit.. dl relevant data eoumes, Including agef~es mneulted. 2- Slate ell tad'rags of fact rageMine e~vimnmental eerieerrs. & ~late epecI~c miti~tion me~ures, If identir~ble without requiring an environmentll tmplcl report (E.I.R.) 4. ff edditionll kdom~tio~ b required before the enviroevta~lal eraant can be completed, refer to Subaa_l'cn A. 5. ff adc!itk:xil m m needed to Qompiete this 8ection, check the box It Ihe end of the section anO attach the nicestely sheets. ~ECTK)NI ~NO. IIIB.3 IIIB.4,8 IIIB.17 SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OFFACT, M;IGATION MEASURES: The General Plan designation for land use suitability pertaining to g~OUna~h~no ~ ~tm~f~hl~ Pntpnf~l ~m4~rf~ rRn h~ mitigR~p~ t~ Rn acceptable level throuqh conformance with the Uniform Building Code and County ordinances. Potential sianificant imoacts related to slopes and erosion includes the visual appearance of pemanently altered land foms, severe erosion of unprotected slooeS and possible SlODe instability. The potential impact pertaining to visual appearance is mitigated by Development Standards outlined in Section ILIA.6 of SPeCifiC Plan No. 21g. The potential for erosion is being studied in a slope stability study and the development of SpeCific requirements for alluvial/colluvial removal at the tract staqe. Temporary groundcover will be provided to prevent erosion during the construction phase as indicated in EIR No. 235. Potential noise' impacts will be datemined by noise studies to be rnndmjrfpd alnrXQ rnRdwqJ/~. Nitigation will include heiqht of attention wall and any other reconmnended by the noise study. Nonitoring and rppnrtin~ i~ reqJjired. V. 3~IFORMATION' IOUIICES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MrrlGATION MEASURES (oontlnuecl) IIIB.18 IIIB.26 ITTR.?R TVR 11-15 8OURb'IE~AOENClESCONSULTED, FINDINOS0FFACl, MITIGA~ON MEASURES: A statement of overridinq findings was adopted by the Board of Supervisors for cumulative effects on air quality Which cannot be fully mitiQated. Although a small portion of the Site has soils suitable for agriculture based on the General Plan, it was determined in EIR No. 235 that there would be no significant impact due to the loss of agricultural land. Th~ ~it~ ~ within the historic range of the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat. A biological report prepared for The Meadows Specific Plan (SP 219) indicated fhAf nnnA nf thp ~p~ri;~ w~re 1oratPd nn the sitP nf thP tract. Therefore. no mitiqation was required. Th~ i~l,~ havp horn ~i~rmJ~H ~n~ ~dr~pd in ~pprifir Plan Nn. Correspondinq environmental review is thorouqhly discussed in EIR No. 235. Impacts have been reduced to an acceptable level. VL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION: I~1 The pn:dect wg not himvim · alOftgiant effect ~n 1~ Invkonmmnt Iml · Ne~ DecMfafion my be ~ The project oould henwe · dgnltkanf k on the mwkonnent; h~,~.,s,lr, Imm w~i no~ be · signWant edlmcm in Idm mine tmcm~,_m h ~ Ixolect and · Negroeve Decimndkm nay be · ~ r.-t~: january/7,} 1989 ,,._~m,z~by Chris Ormsby 1 @ mamm ? #, CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 24135-2 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage $ Water Sewer TOTAL $ FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY 472,500 112,500 119,500 704,500 DATE: May 24, 1994 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY $ 236,500 56,500 60,000 $ 352,500 Maintenance Retention $70,500 Monument Security $19,000 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee Fire Mitigation Fee - Paid Signal Mitigation Fee - Paid Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees N/A Exempt 30,000.00 11,250.00 N/A T.B.D* SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation 'Plan Plan Check Fee · Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Letter of Map Revision (LOMAR Review) Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *T.B.D, - To be determined $ 178.00 $ 8.00 $ 2,990.00 $ N/A $ 950.00 $ N/A $ 4,126.00 $ 0.00 -4- r:\agdrpt\94\0524\24135-2.agn skg KENNETH L, EDWARDS GENERAl, MANAGER .CH(F F. NGINE ER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT September 17, 1993 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE. CA 92501 · 1719 (909) 275-1200 (909) 788°9965 FAX City of Temecula Public Works Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92591 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: The Meadows Paloma Del Sol West This-letter is sent at the request of Michael A. Tylman of Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates. The following referenced tracts are not within the boundaries of the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan. No area drainage plan fees are required for these developments. TRACTS 24131-1, 2, 3 & F 24133-1, 2, 3, 5 & F 24134-3 & F 24135-1, 2, 3 & F 24136-1, 2, 3 & F Portions of the following tracts are within the boundaries, for which fees have been paid. The remainder of these same tracts are. not subject to any fees: TRACTS 24132-1 & F 24133-4 24134-1 & 2 Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at 909/275-1265. /~H~W."~'RD L.' DIC~:~RSON Senior Civil Engineer c: Michael A. Tylman, RBF SK:sl.j skl0917a RESTATEMENT AND AMENDMENT OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA and BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and MESA HONIF~ (Park Fees) INDEX 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Page Amend Development Agreement ............................. 4 Eastside Tract Maps .................................... 5 Cost of Litigation ...................................... 5 Public Facilities Fees Shortfail .............................. 6 Reimbursement of Fees ................................... 6 Parks, Greenbelts and Paseos ............................... 6 Main Recreation Areas ................................... 7 Remaining Open Space Areas ............................... 8 Timing of Park Improvements and Transfer to City .................. 8 Fee Credits .......................................... 9 Standstill Agreement .................................... 9 Park Fee Obligation .............................. : ...... 10 10 Jurisdiction and Attorneys' Fees ............................. Severability .......................................... 10 Entire Agreement ...................................... 10 Construction ......................................... 10 Amendment of Agreement ................................. 11 Time of the Essence .................................... 11 No Precommitment ..................................... 11 Pay Under Protest ...................................... 11 Superseding ......................................... 11 Counterparts ......................................... 12 07-]0-92 177;>1-001)/,9 G:'~DOC\152\92010026.~ i EXHIBITS EXHIBIT "A" - MAP OF PARKS, PASEOS, GREENBELTS 07-30-92 12221-00049 G: M)OC\152\92010026, i106 RESTATEMENT AND AMENDMENT OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (Quimby Park Fees) This Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding CMOU") is entered into by and between the City of Temecula ("City") and Bedford Development Company and Mesa Homes (collectively "Bedford") to be effective on August 11, 1992, with reference to the following: RECITALS A. City and Bedford have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding effective January 31, 1992. City and Bedford wish to restate and amend the Memorandum of Understanding to modify certain provisions due to changed circumstances. B. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864, et seq. "'Development Agreement Statutes"), Bedford and the County of Riverside ("County") entered into Development Agreement No. 4 recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County on November 7, 1988, as Instrument No. 325513 ("Development Agreement"). C. The Development Agreement encompasses a project formerly located within County approved Specific Plan No. 219 ("Specific Plan") known as "Paloma del Sol", a mixed use subdivision project to be developed on property owned by Bedford which became a part of the municipal boundaries .of the City when the City incorporated on December 1, 1989. D. Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement Statutes, the City became the successor-in-interest to the County under the Development Agreement upon incorporation of the City. E. A dispute has arisen between the City and Bedford over the amount of fees or land dedication for park or recreational purposes Bedford is required to provide to City as allowed under Section 66477 of the California Government Code CQuimby Park Tees"). 07-30-92 12221-001~49 G:\DOC\152\92010026.R06 F. On May 20, 1987, the County amended Ordinance No. 460 authorizing the imposition of Quimby Park Fees. Ordinance No. 460 required adoption of an implementation resolution designating a recipient of the Quimby Park Fees. On June 28, 1988, pursuant to Resolution No. 88-218, the County designated CSA 143 as the recipient of Quimby Park Fees subject to the adoption of a master plan. On June 27, 1989, pursuant to Resolution No. 89-331, the County adopted a master plan for CSA 143, establishing the Quimby Park Fees at three (3) acres per 1,000 new residents ("County Park Fee Standard"). G. Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-53, adopted on May 8, 1990, City has adopted Quimby Park Fees of five (5) acres of land for parks and recreational purposes, or payment of fees in lieu thereof, for every 1,000 people to reside in the proposed subdivision ("City Park Fee Standard"). H. The City interprets the Development Agreement to permit the imposition of increased Quimby Park Fees computed on the City Park Fee Standard and has required Bedford to pay Quimby Park Fees based on the City Park Fee Standard as a condition of issuance of building permits for Paloma del Sol. Bedford disagrees with this position and interprets the provisions of the Development Agreement to limit the City's authority to impose Quimby Park Fees based on the park and open space requirements of the Specific Plan as approved by the County and incorporated into the Development Agreement. I. In order to avoid a legal challenge to the Quimby Park Fees and to prevent the running of any relevant statutes of limitation while attempts are being made to resolve this.dispute, Bedford and City have entered into a Standstill Agreement effective on April 9, 1991, as amended.CStandstill Agreement"). J. City and Bedford acknowledge that development of Paloma del Sol will result in a generation of significant municipal revenue, public infrastructure facilities and the enhancement of the quality of life, including recreation facilities for present and future residents of the City. The benefits to the City and Bedford contemplated by Paloma del Sol include: (1) the opportunity for a high quality residential-commercial project creating significant job opportunities, sales tax and ad valorera tax revenues for the City; 07-30-92 12221-0004.9 G: \DOC\ 152\92010026. NO6 (2) payment of substantial impact fees to be used to solve City and regional traffic infrastructure demands; (3) a payment of public facilities fees; (4) (5) participation in special assessment and/or community facilities districts to finance City and regional infrastructure improvements; the creation of significant park, recreation and open space dedications for public use and the protection of significant natural resources. K. It is contemplated that the Specific Plan will be amended (Amendment No. 3) to: (i) add an 8+ acre neighborhood park at the southeast comer of De Portola Road and "H" Street; (ii) change the target density for Planning Area 6 up to 19.8 du/ac; md (iii) clarify the intent of the Specific Plan to be consistent with the terms and conditions of the approved vesting tentative map for Paloma del Sol. L. The new 8+ acre park to be dedicated by Bedford to the City is located in Planning Area 6 of the Specific Plan. Planning Area 6 provides for development of 37.8 acres with Very High density residential use at a maximum total of 590 dwelling units. At such time as the Specific Plan is amended to delineate the 8+ acre park, the remainder of Planning Area 6 will be reduced to 29.8 acres. Thereafter, development of Planning Area 6 up to the maximum number of 590 residential dwelling units will fall within the allowable Density Range of 14-20 du/ac of the Specific Plan but not within the target density of 15.6 du/ac unless the target density for Planning Area 6 is amended to 19.8 du/ac as pan of Specific Plan Amendment No. 3. M. The City and Bedford acknowledge that due to the present economic recession, none of these benefits to the City are possible unless the Paloma del Sol project proceeds with development. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the present structure of fees and private recreation and open space requirements creates substantial impediments to development of Paloma del Sol. 07-30-92 12221-00049 G:\DOC\152\92010026.1't06 3 N. Without admitting or determining any fights or obligations as between City and Bedford, each to the other, with respect to the amount of the Quimby Park Fees, and solely to avoid the potential expense and inconvenience of protracted litigation, and to balance the needs of the City to provide adequate parks and recreational facilities with the difficulty of land development in today's economy, City and Bedford agree to settle this matter based on the terms and conditions of this MOU. AGREEMENT 1. Amend Development Agreement. In accordance with the procedures set forth in the Development Agreement Statutes, City and Bedford shall commence the necessary proceedings to consider amending the Development Agreement to: eliminate the County Public Facilities and Services Mitigation Fee and replace it with a City Public Facilities Fee; provide that for a period of two (2) years from the date of recording the amendment to the Development Agreement, the City Public Facilities Fee shall be paid in lieu of the Regional Statistical Area Fee CRSA Fee") established by County Ordinance No. 659 adopted by the City and in lieu of the County Public Facilities Fee set forth in the Development Agreement; provide that for a period of two (2) years from the date of recording the amendment to the Development Agreement, the City Public Facilities Fee shall be Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) per each residential unit ("Interim Public Facilities Fee" as applied to the development of Paloma del Sol whether constructed by Bedford or any other merchant builder purchasing Paloma del Sol tracts from Bedford. Bedford shall pay K-Rat, fire, traffic signal and drainage mitigation fees; 0Z-30-9Z 12221-00049 G: \DOC\152\92010026.R06 4 provide that after said two year period the mount of the Interim Public Facilities Fee shall be increased up to the amount of the City's Public Facilities Fee imposed on all projects in the City at that time. In the event the City has not adopted a City Public Facility Fee by the end of said two year period, Bedford shall continue to pay the Interim Public Facilities Fee until such time as the City adopts a City Public Facilities Fee; provide that Bedford will be subject to paying a City Public Facilities Fee for non-residential development in the Paloma del Sol project in accordance with the provisions Of the City's non- residential Public Facilities Fee ordinance. In the event the City has not adopted a Public Facilities Fee for non-residential development at the time of issuance of building permits for commercial construction, Bedford agrees to abide by the City's procedures relating to payment of future non-residential Public Facilities Fees applicable to all projects in the City in effect at that time; and provide that the park land and recreation facilities to be dedicated to the City as contemplated by this MOU shall fully satisfy Bedford's obligation to pay Quimby Park Fees and to provide parks and recreational facilities for the Paloma del Sol project consistent with the Specific Plan and this MOU. 2. Eastside Tract Maps. City shall cooperate in commencing the necessary proceedings in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act to amend the Paloma del Sol "Eastside" Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 24182, 24184, 24185, 24186, 24187 and 24188 with no new conditions inconsistent with the terms of the Specific Plan as may be amended and this MOU, including the 8-Acre Park described in Section 7(a) of this MOU. Neither party waives its rights as to what constitutes "consistency" with the Specific Plan. 3. Cost of Litigation. In the event the County seeks to challenge the fight of City and Bedford to enter into this MOU or to amend the Development Agreement and institutes an action, suit or proceeding to challenge this MOU or invalidate and/or enjoin the 07-30-92 12221-0004~9 G: \DOC\152\92010026. I. I06 5 enforcement of this MOU or the amendment to the Development Agreement or take such other action(s) which result in unreasonable delays in the development of the Paloma del Sol project, the parties agree to cooperate and participate in a joint defense in any action against the paxties, their officers, agents and employees, from any and all such obligations, liability, suit, claim, loss, judgment, Hen, resulting from such action(s) brought by County (but excluding actions to expunge any lis pendens) and to share equally the costs associated with attorneys' fees, costs and damages that the parties may incur as a result of any such actions or lawsuit to challenge City and/or Bedford's legal authority to enter into this MOU and/or amend the Development Agreement. In the event the County prevails in any such litigation after exhaustion of any procedural appeals, the provisions relating to the payment of Interim Public Facilities Fees as set forth in this MOU and/or the amendment to the Development Agreement shall terminate. 4. Public Facilities Fees Shortfall. In the event the County prevails in any legal action or other proceeding to challenge, set aside, or enjoin the enforcement of the amendment to the Development Agreement and a court or other tribunal having jurisdiction over the matter after all appeals are taken, determines that Bedford and/or the City is liable to make up any shortfall in the amount of the Public Facilities and Services Mitigation fees owned by City and/or Bedford to County, then City and Bedford shall each share equally in paying any such shortfall. 5. Reimbursement of Fees. If prior to the amendment to the Development Agreement and in the event Bedford is required to pay public facilities fees and/or RSA fees in an amount greater than the amount set forth in the amendment to the Development Agreement, Bedford shall be entitled to reimbursement of the difference in the amount of the fees paid within thirty (30) days of the date of recordation of the Amendment to the Development Agreement. 6. Parks. Greenbelts and Paseos. As additional consideration for entering into this MOU, Bedford agrees to dedicate to the City, or cause to be dedicated, and City agrees to accept when offered, park land, greenbelts, slopes and paseos equalling approximately 166.5 acres. Bedford and the Paloma del Sol Association ("Association") may also dedicate approximately 27.5 acres of park land and paseos to the City. The park land, greenbelts, slopes and paseos are described on Exhibit A which is attached and made a part hereof and incorporated by this reference. 07-30-~ 1222.1-0004,9 G:~,DOC\152\92010026.1*06 6 7. Main Recreation Areas. The six main recreation areas and the terms for dedication to the City are described as follows: (a) An eight-acre park located in Specific Plan Planning Area No. 6 and within Tentative Tract 25417 (8-Acre Park) will be improved with two baseball diamonds/soccer field combination with lights, restroom and concession building, group picnic area, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot. (b) A seven and seventy-four hundredths (7.74) acre park located in Tract 24133-2, Lot 114 ("7.74 Acre Park") will be improved as a "passive park" and may be dedicated to the City in Bedford's sole discretion sometime in the future. (c) A thirteen and eighty-four hundredths (13.84) acre paseo park located in Tract 24133-3, Lot 106 ("13.84 Acre Paseo Park") currently improved with tot lots, basketball courts, tennis court, picnic areas with tables and barbecues, walkways/bikeways with lighting and may be dedicated to the City at sometime in the future at Bedford' s discretion and after receiving the prior consent of at least a majority of the members of the Association. (d) An approximate five and nine tenths (5.9) acre paseo park located in Tract 24134-3, Lots 68, 69, 70, 71 and a portion of Lot 83 of Tract 24134-F ("5.9 Acre Paseo Park") currently improved with a tot lot, basketball court, picnic areas with tables and barbecue, walk-ways/bikeways with lighting. This park is owned by the AssociatiOn and may at the discretion of the Association be dedicated to the City-sometime in the future. (e) A seven and forty-four hundredths (7.44) acre park located in the Eastside (future) Tract 24186-4, Lot 1 ("7.44 Acre Park") planned to be improved with a combination soccer/baseball field with lights, restrooms and concession building, group picnic area, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot. (f') A nine and thirty-five hundredths (9.35) acre paseo park located in the Eastside (future) Tracts including: Lots 159 and 160 of (future) Tract 24186-1; Lots 121 and 129 of (future) Tract 24186-2 and Lot 121 of (future) Tract 24187-F ("9.35 Acre 07-30-92 12.2..2.1 -O00t,9 G:"d)OC\152\~OIO026.1~:16 7 Paseo Park") planned to be improved with a basketball court, tot lot, picnic area, walkway/bikeways with lighting landscaping and irrigation. 8. Remaining Open Space Areas. (a) The remaining recreation and open space areas consist of 142 acres of greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, public parkway and slope landscaping, both east and west sides of Paloma del Sol. (b) Those perimeter and interior greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, parks and slopes shown on Exhibit A which are transferred to the City will be maintained by the Temecula Community Services District CTCSD"). All assessments for maintenance shall be in compliance with the standards and formulas imposed by the TCSD on a city- wide basis. 9. Timing of Park Improvements and Transfer to City. (a) The 8-Acre Park shall be fully improved and transferred to the City as soon as December 31, 1992, but no later than March 31, 1993. Additional street improvements to De Portoh and construction of Campanula Way adjacent to the 8-Acre park will be completed as development of the adjoining tracts occurs, but not later than five (5) years from the date of the amendment of the Development Agreement. (b) Improvement to the 7.44-Acre Park shall commence at the time of development of the adjoining tracts (Tract Nos. 24186-1, 2, 3, 4 and Final). Improvements to the 9.35-Acre Paseo Park shall commence at the time of development of the adjoining tracts (Tract Nos. 24186-1, 2 and Final). Improvements to the 7.44 Acre Park and the 9.35-Acre Paseo Park shall be completed on or before the issuance of 50% of the certificates of occupancy for the dwelling units constructed in the-adjoining tracts. Both of these parks shall be transferred to the City in accordance with the current TCSD funding procedures and practices. (c) Improvement to and transfer of the remaining 142 acres of greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, public parkway and slope landscaping, both East and 07-30-~ 122_21-00(V,9 G: ~\152\~010026.E ~est sides of Paloma del Sol shall occur with the completion of development of the adjoining tracts and in accordance with the current TCSD funding procedures and practices. (d) Bedford may extend the improvement completion and park transfer dates as set forth in this MOU with written consent from the City. (e) City shall receive and approve all park and recreation facilities improvement plans in accordance with the City's park standards, procedures and specifications except the City shall accept without any modifications to the improvements to the 13.84-Acre Paseo Park and the 5.9-Acre Paseo Park as currently constructed and installed provided' these parks are transferred to the City. (f) The approximately 194 acres of parks, greenbelts and paseos shall be transferred to the City by grant deeds from Bedford and the Association, depending on ownership. City agrees to accept the parks and any improvements within a reasonable time of being offered for dedication. The City shall be responsible for establishing any maintenance obligations with the TCSD associated with the parks, paseos and greenbelt ~reas described in this MOU. 10. Fee Credits. At the time of completion of the improvements and transfer of each of the public parks as provided in this MOU, Bedford shall receive a credit against payment of future City Public Facilities Fees based on the actual improvement cost incurred by Bedford for each of said public parks up to a maximum credit of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). City shall have a right to review, audit and verify all costs associated with said park improvements under procedures to be mutually agreed upon between the parties. 11. Standstill Agreement. Until the Development Agreement is amended as contemplated by this MOU, the Standstill Agreement shall govern the fights and obligations of the parties with regards to Quimby Park Fees associated with the Paloma del Sol project, except that it shall be amended to remain in full force and effect until a certificate of occupancy is issued by the City for the 500th residential dwelling unit in the Paloma del Sol project. 07-30-92 12221 -OOGe,9 G: XDOC\ 152\92010026 ,I,106 9 12. Park Fee Obligation. Upon execution of this MOU by the parties, regardless of undue delays or the outcome of any lawsuit or action brought by County or terms of settlement of any action or proceeding which may be instituted by the County against City and/or Bedford relating to this MOU or the amendment to the Development Agreement, Bedford's Quimby Park Fee obligation for the Paloma del Sol project shall be satisfied based on the requirements provided in Sections 6, 7 and 8 of this MOU excluding Tract 24183 which currently satisfies the City Park Fee Standard. Bedford's Quimby Park Fee obligation with regard to Planning Area 6, as shown on Exhibit A, up to the maximum number of 590 attached residential units permitted by the Specific Plan Density Range shall also be satisfied. 13. Jurisdiction and Attorneys' Fees. This MOU is made and entered into in the State of California, and this MOU, and any rights, remedies, or obligations provided for herein shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 14. Severability. If any portion, provision or part of this MOU is held, determined, or adjudicated to be invalid, unenforceable, or void for any reason whatsoever, each such portion, provision, or part shall be severed from the remaining portions, provisions, or parts of this MOU and shall not affect the validity or enforceability of such remaining portions, provisions, or parts. 15. Entire Agreement. This MOU contains the entire understanding and agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the matters referred to herein. No other representations, covenants, undertakings or other prior to contemporaneous agreements, oral 'or written, respecting such matters, which are not specifically incorporated herein, shall be deemed in any way to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. The parties hereto acknowledge that each party has not executed this MOU in reliance on any such promise, representation, or warranty. 16. Construction. This MOU shall not be construed against the party preparing it, but shall be construed as if both parties jointly prepared this MOU and any uncertainty and ambiguity shall not be interpreted against any one party. 07-30-92 12221-00049 G: ~DOC\152\92010026 .I.106 10 17. Amendment of Agreement. This MOU shall not be modified by either party by oral representation made before or after the execution of this MOU. All modifications must be in writing and signed by the parties, and each of them. 18. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence for the performance of each and every covenants and the satisfaction of each and every condition contained in this MOU. 19. No Precommitment. City and Bedford understand and agree that certain actions of the City contemplated by this MOU will require compliance with legal procedures regulations and public hearings accompanied by discretionary decisions. The parties acknowledge that nothing contained in this MOU shall be construed as a precommitment or requiring the City Planning Commission or City Council to approve any discretionary actions contemplated by this MOU. 20. Pay Under Protest. This will acknowledge that as agreed to in the January 31, 1992 MOU, Bedford has withdrawn its notices of payment of permit fees under protest and terminated the Standstill Agreement relating to said fees. 21. Superseding. This MOU shall supersede, amend, and restate the Memorandum of Understanding effective January 31, 1992, and shall control the fights, duties and obligations of the parties as to the subject matter of this MOU. 07-30-9Z 122Z1-00049 G:\DOC\152%.92010026.1406 11 22. Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. ATTEST: June Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA BY:~ ~ Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor Csaba F. Ko, Vice President MESA HOMES, a Califor~~rporation Will'iam M. Butler, President 07-30-92 122221-000049 G:\DOC\152\92010026.M06 12 ITEM NO. 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 24, 1994 Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-2 (located west Parkway and south of Pauba Road) of Meadows PREPARED ~'~ - BY: Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer Land Development im D. Faul, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-2 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract No. 24131 was originally submitted to Riverside County Planning Department on January 3, 1989. The Tentative Vesting Tract Map was approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 23, 1989. Tentative Tract No. 24131-2was granted an extension of time by the "Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temucula, Bedford Development Company, and Mesa Homes (Park Fees)" recorded February 18, 1993 (attached). The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval. Final Vesting Tract No. 24131-2 contains 130 residential lots and 4 open space lots within 28.88 gross acres. The tract is located west of Meadows Parkway and south of Pauba Road. This tract is part of the Meadows Specific Plan (County approved SP 219) and County of Riverside Development Agreement No. 4. The applicant is Kemper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC), Inc. The following fees have been paid for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-2. Signal Mitigation Fee Fire Mitigation Fee 913,950 937,200 -1 - r:~agdrpt\94%O524\24131-2.agn The following fees have been deferred for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-2: Public Facilities Fee Flood Control Fee (ADP) Stephen's K-Rat Fee Due prior to Building Permit Exempt per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 (attached) Due prior to Grading Permit The parkland dedication requirement (Quimby) has been satisfied pursuant to the Amendment of "Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, KRDC, Inc. (formerly Bedford Development Company) and Mesa Homes (Park Fees)", which was approved by City Council on December 8, 1992. Among other things, this Development Agreement provides for the granting of several improved parks to the City. The initial Paloma Del Sol City Park has been completed and was accepted by the City on January 25, 1994. The following bonds have been posted for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-2: Faithful Labor & Subdivision Performance Material Monument Street and Drainage Water Sewer Survey Monuments 9691,500 9346,000 9207,500 9104,000 9183,500 992,000 Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee Bond Amount 913,950.00 Fire Mitigation Fee Bond Amount 937,200 $22,000 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Development Fee Checklist Location Map Copy of Map Conditions of Approval Fees and Securities Report RCFCD letter dated September 17, 1993 Copy of Restatement and Amendment of Mem. of Understanding -2- r:~agdrpt~94\0524\24131-2.agn CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Vesting Tract MaD No. 24131-2 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees) Traffic Signal Mitigation Public Facility Condition of Aooroval Condition No. 26b See Staff Report See Road Department Letter Dated 4/12/89, Item 22 pursuant to Development Agreement Fire Mitigation Flood Control (ADP) See Fire Department Letter Dated 2/24/89 Exempt per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 -3- r:\agdrpt~94\0524\24131-2.agn TRACT 2413 1-2 "cTZlTE FllGi,JWA~ PIE'OJECT SITE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24131 AHENDED NO. I 0 n STANDARD CONDITIONS The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24131, Amended No. I which action is brought about within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly= notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against th~ County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County $urveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological condition~"of the site. If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of a comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as may be additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24131, Amended No. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 2 ,' 7. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety prior to connencement of any grading outside of county maintained road right of way, 8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated~-;-aB- 4-14-89, a copy of which is attached. (Amended by Planning Connission April 12, 1989) 10. Legal access as requi red by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. 1. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or.abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commissioner. 12. Easements, when utilities, etc., within the ]and conveyances shall Surveyor.. required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, shall be shown on the final map if they are located division boundary. All offers of dedication and be submitted and recorded as directed by the County 13. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Hea~th Department's letter dated 3-20-89 a copy of which is attached. 14. 5. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recon~nendations outlined *by the Riverside County Mood Control District's letter dated 3-27-89 a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner. The subdtv. tder shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Narshal's letter dated 2-27-89 a copy of whi'ch is attached. 6o Subdivision phasing, including any proposed conanon open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24131. An,sKied No. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 3 - The' subdivider and all successors in interest shall comply with the provisions of Development Agreement No. 4 and Specific Plan No. 219. 18. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: 19. 20. 1) All lots shall have a'minimum size of 4000 square feet· 2) Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and non-through lots. 3) 4) Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Specific Plan ~one. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free.: condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met: County Fire Department County Flood Control County Health Department County Parks Department A property owners' association with the unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs shall be established and continuously maintained. The association shall have the right to lien .the property of the owners who default in the payment of their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any encumbrance other than a first deed of trust provided such deed of trust is made in good faith and for value and is of record prior to the lien of the association. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Office of the County Counsel: 1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24131, Amended No. 1 Conditions of ~proval Page 4 ': 2) A sample document conveying tttle to the purchaser of an individual lot or untt whtch provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall (a) provtde for a mtntmum term of 60 years, (b) provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each Individual lot or unlt, (c) provtde for ownership of the common area by either the property owners' association or the owners of each Individual lot or unit as tenants tn common and (d) contain the following provisions verbatim: "Nothwithstandtng any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provision shall apply: The property owners' association established heroin shall manage and~ continuously maintain the 'common area', more particularly described as~ lots A through H on Vesting Tract Hap NO. 24131 Amended No. 1 attached: hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common area', or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. This Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'con~non area'. In the event of any conflict betWeen'this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the-Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control." Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final map is recorded. (Added by Planning Commission April 12, 1989) Pwter to weeerdatten ef tke (tna~ mep~ tke sobdivider eka~ eeevey to tke Geenty fee s~ep~e t~t;e? to a~ neemen or neemen open spaee areas, ;ree and e;eer e; a~) 4tHeas, UMeS, aSSeSsment, Leases (weeorded and enweeerded) mad emsemenms, e. sept tkose easeseems ~tek tn mke so~e dinerenteR ef the Geenty ace eeeeptab~e, As conditions p~eeedent to the Geewry aeeeptCng t¢t;e te seek apses, the subdivider ska~; subnit tke ~e~Tew~ng deriements to the P~onning Department ~ev Feetowl whisk documents sha;~ be seb~eet to the approve; e~ that department and the 6;fiee ef the i~ A desperation e~ sevenants, sendirises and PestFictional and VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24131, Annned No. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 5 '~'~- A sample deeemen~ eenvey~ng ~e ke (he pwwshaseF ef am ~nd~v4dwa~ ~ek ew Wn~ whisk p~ev~des Shah ~ke des~aPat~ee e~ eeveeae~s, eend~k~ens and ~es~¢e~ens 4s 4needpedaled khe~e~R by wefe~enae. The dee~awak~en ef sevenaRks. eend~ens end fe~ wev4~,w ska~ ~a~ pwev~de ~ew a keen ef 6e yeses, kke esUb~shmen~ efa pweper~y eweewsz assoe~a~en eee~sed sweeps of seek 4ed~v~dwa~ ;ok ew wn~k and ~e~ eenta~n ~he pFev~s~ens yewharem, eNeSw~&hs~and~n9 any FFev~s~en 4n kh~s 9ee~awa~ee ~e ~he een~pa~y, the reviewing pvev~s~en sha~ apply4 ;he F~eFe~ty eweews~ assee~atCen established keve~n ska~, ~f dePman~; be ae~va~ed3 by ~,eePpepat~ee eP elkeww~se~ a~ the weqees~ of kke Geen~y ef R~vews~de, amd kke F~epe~ty ewee~sz sssee~a~e, ska~ wnsend~t~ena~y aeeepk f~em the Geen~y of R~veFs~de~ wpen kke Gewm~y~s demamd. k~t4e (e a;~ ff any 9aw~ of the zeee~en aweaz~ meFe pawS~eeTa~y dese;~bed as ~eSs A Skwewgh Mee Vest4ng ;Fast No. ~4~3~ Amended Ne. & a~aeked heweke. The dee~s~e, be Me~e~,e ae~va~ee e~ ~ke p~eFeP~y ewRe,s~ wneeRd~t~eRa~y aseep~ ~e be lhe zsemmen a~eaz sha~ be at ~ke ;n ~ke evenk akak the neemen awes. ew amy leawk ~kewee~, eaRrayed (e kke ~repev~y sweeps~ assendangeR, kke aheweaf~ew ska~ ewe seen Assmean awea~. ska;~ manage and eemtCnwees~y me+n~a4n seek zeeeeen a~eaz, e~ amy ~Va absenk the p~e~ wP~tten ionseek of the P~ann~n9 9~weete~ of the ;eee~y ef R~ve~s~de ff (he ;ewety~s seeeesse~-~n-~n~e~est. ~ke pPepeP~y ewtePsz assee~at~en ska;~ have kke P~gk~ ke assess ~he m4et, li4n~n9 seek zeeeeen a,az, ned ska~ have kke w~gkk -~dee pPepe~y e~ amy seek evmeM who desserts 4R (he payweek ea4ekeneeee assesseenkr An assessmeek ~en~ enee s~eated, ska~ be pv~eP (e a~ o~kew 4~ens ~eee~ded sebseqeen~ (e kke ee~ee assessmeek eP e~kev deeemeek ePeat~n9 Ike assessmen( VESTXNG TEHTATZVE TRACT NO. 24131, Amended No. 1 Conditions of'~Droval Page 6 _~. 20 3e 24. h 4ke even~ o~ any eon~E~ between (k~s Dee~a~a~oa and (ke Awlte~es e~ ~RSePpOPatiOtT the Bylaws, or abe pwepep,y ewReps1 asseeta~ten R.~es and 'Reg.~a~iens, 4~ aMy~ this 9ee~ava~eR sha~ eenlPe~f~ gRee appveved, ,he deelaPa,~em ef eeveRaR~s, eeRd~eRs aRd wes~p4e~teRs shall be weee~ded at ~he same time ~ha~ the fiRa~ map is PeeePded, (Deleted by Planning'Commission April 12, 1989) The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping conditions: 1) Prior to recordation of the final map the developer shall file an application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a parkway maintenance district for Vesting Tentative Tract no. 24131, Amended No. I in accordance with the Landscaping an~ Lighting Act of lg72, unless the project is within an existin~ parkway maintenance district. _ 2) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable for permanent filing with the County Road Department. 3) The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be released concurrently with the release of subdivision performance bonds, guaranteeing the viability of all landscaping which will be installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibiqity by the district. 4) The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees, shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over by the district. 5} The developer shall comply with the standards and exhibits 'in Specific Plan No. 219. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning' Director. Street lights shall be provided within the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following: VESTING TEXTATIVE TRACT NO. 24131, Amended No. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 7 ' 1 ) Concurrently with the fi 1 i ng of subdi vi si on improvement plans with the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer and then from the appropriate utility purveyor. 2) Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an application with LAFCO for the formation of a street lighting district, or annexation to an existing lighting district, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. 3) Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall secure conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. 4) All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and. Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. 25. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet {ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. a. The fol lowi ng note shal 1 be placed on the Envi tonmental / Constraints Sheet: "County Slope Stability Report No. 87 was ..p' prepared for this property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of concern in the report are as follows: slope stability." 26. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: a, Pwtem, 4~e l~ke 4~suaM~e 04~ gndCM~ pemmm~i~s,m 4~ke app~ieammt~ ska~ ebmatm e)emPamee (wom mhe U,S, Fish ~e (ke eMismet~e e~ ike 6~ephetS'- kGatga~ee Ra~ ee ~he si~e- (Deleted by Planning Co~ntssion Apt11 12, 1989) b. Prior to the tssuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paytrig the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prtor to the payment of VESTING TENTATLVE TRACT NO. 24131, Amended No. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 8 the fees required by Ordinance No. 633, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Prior to the issuance of fPadtMg building permits detailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. 'The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: {Amended by Planning Commission April 12, 1989) 1. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. 2. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. ~ 3. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened; from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. 4. Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth berming, ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amenities where appropriate as approved by the Planning Department. 5. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. 6. Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-my of interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient -. road right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-way. 7. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. 8. All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the subject property shall be shown on the project's grading plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained. 9. All trees shall be minirum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing trees shall be steel staked. VF, STIItG TE?iTATIVE TRACT NO. 24131, Amended No. 1 Conditions of Approva] Page 9 ,. 10. The plans shall conform to those shown in Specific Plan No. 219. Any oak trees removed with four (4) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be replaced on a ten {10} to one (1) basis as approved by the Planning Di rector. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. The following tree preservation guidelines shall be incorporated in the projects approved grading, building and landscaping plans as appropriate: Every effort shall be made to prevent encroachment of structures, grading or trenching within the dripline or twenty-five (25} feet of the trunk of any trees, whichever is greater. 2. If encroachment within the dripline is unavoidable, no more than one third of the root area shall be disturbed, graded or covered with impervious materials. The root area is considered to extend beyond the dripline a distance equal to one half the radius. 3. Building, grading or improvements shall not occur within ten {10} feet of any tree trunk. 4. Retaining walls shall be constructed where necessary to preserve natural grade at least one-half the distance between the trunk and the dripline. Walls shall be designed with a post or caisson footing rather than a continuous footing to minimize root damage. 5. Alteration of'natural drainage shall be avoided to the greatest extent possible. 6. Runoff channelled near trees shall not substantially change normal soil moisture characteristics on a seasonal basis. 7. Runoff shall not be directed towards the base of trees so that the base of the trees remain in wet soil for an extended period. Where natural topography has been altered, drainage away from trunks shall be provided where necessary to ensure that water will not stand at the crown. B. Sedimentation and siltation in the drainage ways shall be controlled where necessary to avoid filling around the base of the trees. VESTING TDITATIVE TRACT NO. 24131, Ameded No. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 10 *~: .... _~*. 9 Land uses that would cause excessive sot1 compactton wtthin the dripline of trees shall be avoided. If the areas are planned for recreation, provide trails to restrict compaction to a small area. Heavy use under trees shall be avoided unless measures to minimize compaction are undertaken. 10. Landscaping or irrigation shall not be installed within ten (10} feet of any trees. f. All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. g. All approved grading and building plans shall reflect the utilization of post and beam foundations or the appropriate combination of spli{ level pads and post and beam foundations when development is proposed on natural slopes of fifteen percent or greater measured over a horizontal distance of thirty {30} feet. h. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: 1. Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion sedimentation during and after the grading process. and 2. Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through Narch 3. Preliminary pad and r~adway elevations 4. Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase t. Driveways shall be designed so as not to exceed a fifteen (15) percent grade. j. Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a special terracini (benching) plan, increased slope ratio (i.e., 3:1), retaining wel s, and/or slope planting combined with irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade. VESTZNG TB4TATZVE TRACT NO. 24131, Amended No. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 11 __, me All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceeding ten (10) feet 'in vertical height shall be contour-graded incorporating the following grading techniques: 1) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain. 2} Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain. 3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding. 4} Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the- horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,~ undulating fashion. Natural features such as water courses, specimen trees and significant rock outcrops shall be protected in the siting of individual building pads on final grading plans. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological. impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shal 1 be arranged. When necessary, the pal eontol ogi st or representart ve shal 1 have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERNITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1 ) The project shal 1 comply with the requirements of Development Agreement No. 4. 2} Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety for residential lots backing up to secondary VESTING TBITATZVE TRACT NO. 24131° Amended No. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 12 28. roadways or wider roadways, an acoustical study shall be performed by an acoustical engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be applied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce ambient interior noise levels to 45 Ldn. 3) Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval. The plans shall address all areas and aspects of the tract requiring landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to, perkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard landscaping per the requirements of Specific Plan No. 219. 4) All dwellings to be constructed within designed and constructed with fire approved by the County Fire Harshal. this subdivision shall be retardant (Class B) roofs as Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the~ subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. 6) Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from view of surrounding property. 7) Building separation between all buildings excluding fireplaces shall not be less than ten (10} feet. 8) All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten (1'0} feet. 9) All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic irrigation. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1) Wall and/or fence locations and materials shall conform to the approved wall and fence treatment plan in Specific Plan No. 219. 2) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. I'f seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. 3) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by a Planning Department field inspection. VESTTNG TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24131, Amended No. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 13 ~ 29. 4) Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where applicable. 5) Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and Specific Plan No. 219. 6) Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Specific Plan No. 219. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the subdivider shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning Director of the County of Riverside demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval and mitigation measures of this map and E.A. No. 33433 which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Planning Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. (Added by Planning Connission April 12, 1989} CO:gs:mp OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR MaPeh-7,-&989 Apt11 14, 1989 COU~'I~' ADNNISTRAT~ CZ,h'TTJt ' HAILING ADOR~S$ P.O. BOX 1090 NVIISiD(. CAUFOR.NtA 925432 ('/14) 787-b554 Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: TR 24131 - Amend tl Schedule A - Team SP - SMD #9 *Amended at P.C. 4/12/89 With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Commissioner's Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i,e.,'concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/ or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroacruments by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as approved by the Road Department. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the supdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department. C~L, rrY~TIV~,4OBOLD,JOHSTKE:~e~~gZSOI TR 24131 - Amend ~1 ~ek4~-&989 - April 14, 1989 P'~2 10.. 11. Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department. tRr~_¼i.k~Parkway shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 101. (38'/50') Streets 'D' through 'G", Street 'H" (east of Street 'W"), and Street 'I" shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 103, Section A. (44'/60', with entry median as approved by the Road Commissioner. The remaining interior streets shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (40'/60') Street "A" shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width delhi-cared right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/33', as approved by the Road Commissioner). Streets "B" and "C" shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/33') Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for main- tenants by County. St~dard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and offset cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throughout the landdivision. Aspbaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per sciuare yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. The landdivider will provide left turn lanes on Streets 'A', 'B", and 'C' at all interior intersections as approved by the Road Department. TR*'2~131 - Amend #1 HeFek-~,-i989 -Aprt] 14, 1989 Page 3 14. ,16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 24. The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho California Water District prior to the recordation of the final map. The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance with County Standard 1114 of Ordinance 461. All centerline intersections shall be at 90° with a minimum 50' tangent measured from flow line, or as approved by the Road Conunissioner. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk). The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs an~ knuckles shall be 35 feet. All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. A minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be constructed between driveways. The minimum garage setback shall be 30.feet measured from the face of curb. The landowner/developer shall provide/acquire sufficient public offsite rights of way to provide for primary and secondary access road(s) to a paved and maintained road. Said access road(s) shall be constructed in accordance with Riverside County Standard No; 106, Section B. (32'/60') at a grade and alignment approved by the Road Commissioner. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, a written agreement may be entered into -with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817. Lot access shall be restricted on 'mams~j'qD Parkway, and Streets 'A", 'B", and 'C" and so noted on the final map. *As amended at P.C. 4/12/89 TR 241~31 - Amend #1 Na~eh-~,-ig89 - Apri 1 14, 1989 P- 4 5. Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. 26. 27. When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of slope, a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road Commissioner. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with Specific Plan No. 219. 28. Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance. 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a "Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with Governmental Code Section 56000. 29. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads constructed or improved within the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the subdivision is within an existing assessment district. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a County Service Area in accordance with Governmental Code Section 25210.1. 30. All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the street improvement plans. A striping plan is required for Buecking Parkway and Streets "A", "B", and "C". The removal of the existing striping shall be the responsibility of applicant. Traffic signing and striping shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs borne by the applicant. 2e Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. The following conditions of approval from Specific Plan No. 219- Vail Meadows shall also apply: IR 24131 - Amend tl Me~ek-)~-~98g- - April 14, 1989 Page 5 ZB.' jw All road improvements within the project boundaries shall be constructed to ultimate County Standards in accordance with Ordinance No. 460 and 461 as a requirement of the implementing subdivisions for the Specific Plan, subject to approval by the Road Commissioner. The proposed "Gateway Road is approved, in concept, subject to the submittal and review of design details. Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall require approval by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing maintenance through the establishment of a landscape maintenance district or similar mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. The Rancho Villages Assessment is an integral component of the planning for this area. Prior to the recordation of tract maps within this specific plan or any other .projeci located within the assessment district, the final. actions necessary for formation of the district must be completed· Should the district fail, the project proponent shall prior to recordation of any tract maps within the specific plan boundaries, provide for road improvements in accordance with Table XV-Implementation Schedule for Off-site Roadway Improvements, as attached. In response to the concerns voiced by Caltrans relative to cumulative impacts indicating the need to implement demand management strategies and/or provide for the development of additional highway corridors, the project proponent has agreed to fund such a study to be conducted under the direction of the Road Department as prescribed by Caltrans. The study ~s currently in progress. Very truly yours, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENTof HEAL. March 20, 1989 ,.c.m., o.v,..,.a,. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING "~="" 4080 Lemon Street ~:~:TJ,,~.. Riverside, CA 92502 ATrN: Chris Ormsby R/E; TRACT NAp 24131: Parcels 23,24,2S and 26 of Parcel Map 23432 (440 Lots) 30aS . ,SET STREET IANNING. CA 12220 IkTTM! ILrtH£. CA 12225 ClSA ILAJlCA 7?40 MARGU[RITA RIVERSIDe, CA IrSOd COlel& SOS SOUTH IUENA VISTA CORONA. CA 11T20 el0 NORTH STATE IT. NailS1. CA 12343 IIIIO 41-209 OAIIS ITRE[T IwOtO. CA 12201 LAKE SkillOil 10116 FRASER DR. tAlE ELiIROIIE. CA. 91330 PALl OPelIll t~tS T~IQ~TZ~ICC, JM~I R~LM IIN~ING~. CA lEEIt tiMIS, CA IE370 1S20 LINO(N ITREET RiVERill)(. CA. Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Nap No. 24131 End recommends that: A w, ter system sh,ll be inst,lled ,ccording to plans &nd ,pecific,tion as approved by the v, ter comp,ny ,rid the He,lab Dep&rtment. PermEnent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, vith a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and Joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. B, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 102 of the Public Otilities Commission of the State ef California, when applicable. Illllelll MISSION RIVERSII~. CA Re~ m: Riverside" County PlaAning Dept. Page Tee Attn: Chris Ormsby March ~0, 1989 The plus shall be signed by a registered engineer sad water company with the following certification~ "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract Nap 34131 is accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water service, storage and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract map. This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such tract map at say specific quantities, flows or pressures fire protection or any other purpose'. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. TbS_RISDa_IgI~_~t-Eg~ai~tg;~ the ~tl ~grvtxo£:a_~fL_~c!_tg_£!x~!x-at-ltaa~-t-- Th~s Department has a statement from Rsacho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactor~ financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This Department has a statement from the F~stern Municipal Water District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans sad specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the Cotn~ty Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pips diameter, location of marLholes, complete profiles, pipe and Joint specifications- and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans sad profiles. Riverside County Planning Page 3 March 20, 1989 Alan: Chris Ormsby The piefie shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Tract Nap 24131 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed tract Bap.' Xht_RIaDI_EMI~_bt _ ti a_R£ig£_ 9_ bf_£tg fa _tgz_ibt_ZtGg£ a ign-gt- he It viII be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized prior to recordation of the final map. 'Si~~k' t l Martins'z, Environmen a Health Specialist IV %~,nvironmental Health Services SM:tac Ft~&~Omce 4~209 OMh Seee~ S~k 405 imdio, CA 92201 (619) 342-aSS6 itlVDtSK)EC:DUNTY /1RE D[PAR114E~ IN CX:X:)PERATION WITH THE CALFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ~ ANDFI~PROTECTK~ GLEN J. ~ r/xE; 2-27-89 ~0: ATTN: RE: PLANNING DEPAKTNENT CHRIS ORNSBY TRACT 24131- ANEHDED Jl With respect to the'conditions of approval for the above referenced land division- the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures ba provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2i") located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet ·par= in any direction, with no portion of any lot front·me more than 165 feet from a hydrant. ~Ltnimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system pians to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacins, and,. the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be siSned/approved by a reSister~d civil anSimeet and the local water company with the followinS certification: "I certify that the desjan of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." The required water system, includinS fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water aSency prior to any combustible buildins material beinS placed on an individual lot. HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA The land division is located in the '*Hazardous Fire Area'* of Riverside County as shcnrn on · map on file with the Clerk of I:he Board of Supervisors. Any building constructed on lots crested by this land division shall comply with the special construction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance 546. All road medians to be set back 30 feet from curb line at all intersections- me Subject: Trmc~ 24131 Page 2 All buildings]~shs11 be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any rood shingles or shakes shall have m Class "B" rating and shall be approved by Ehe Fire Department prior to insEallacion. MITIGATION Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposi~ wi~h the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 p&r lot/uni~ as mi=igacion for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose =o defer =he time of paymenn, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment =o =he time of issuance of the first building permit. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred =o =he Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Depar=men~ Planner Kurn Mantwe11, Fire Safety Specialist ama KENNETH L.. EDWAI~DI ¢I, IIEF IIiIIINB, IN I III IIAItKl'r Imrltl~qr P. O. Box lol3 I'IJ-IJ~N~DI, Iw (714) 7'17-1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention= Specific Plan Section Chris Ormsby Ladies and Gentlemen: Vesting Tract 24131 Amended Map No. i This is a proposal to divide about 105 acres in the Rancho California area. The site is to the north of Highway 79 between Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road. This project is a part of Specific Plan 219, Vail Meadows. The area consists of well defined ridges and natural watercourses which traverse this property. TWo major natural watercourses enter the site at the site's northeast corner and middle of the site's east boundary. Storm drains have been proposed to collect and convey these two offsite tributary flows in the Specific Plan; however, no inlet facilities have been shown on the tenta- tive map to collect these flows. Onsite flows and local offsite flows would be handled by storm drains and streets. Following are the District's recommendations: 1. The 100 year offsite tributary flows should be collected and safely conveyed through the site to an adequate outlet. Onsite ~rainage facilities located outside of road right Of way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating, 'Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions'- Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the affected property c~wners. The documents should be recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to recordation of the final map. All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street or an adequate outlet. Riverside County Planhinge--Department Re= Vesti~_.'~ Tract 24131 Amended Map No. 1 -2- March 27, 1989 The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the curb and ~he 100 year storm flow should be contained within the street right of way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, additional ~rainage facilities should be installed- Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows. Additional emergency escape should also be provided. 7. The property's street and lot grading should be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a drainage easement should be obtained from the affected property owners for ~he release of concentrated or di- verted storm flows· A copy of the recorded drainage '~ easement should be submitted to the District for review prior to the recordation of the final map- 8. Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented i.~ediately following rough grading to prevent deposition of debris onto downstream properties or drainage facilities. Development of this property should be coordinated with the development of adjacent properties to ensure that watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not diverted from one watershed to another. This may require the construction of temporary drainage facilities or offsite construction and grading. 0· A portion of the proposed project is in a floodplain and may affect "waters of the United States', "wetlands" or "Jurisdictional streamBeds", therefore, in accordance with the requirements of the National Floo~ Insurance Program and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts 59 through 73) ~nd County Ordinance No. 458z A copy of appropriate correspondence and necessary permits from those government agencies from which approval As required by Federal or State law (such as Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Department of Fish and Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to the District prior to the final District approval of the project. Riverside County Planning.~Department Re= vesting Tract 24131 Amended Map No. I -3- March 27, 1989 Major flood control facilities are being proposed. These should be designed and constructed to District standards including those related to alignment and access to both inlets and outlets. The applicant should consult the District early in t~e design process regarding materials, hydraulic design and transfer of rights of way. 2. All flood control facilities should be constructed to District standards. And all facilities that the District will assume for maintenance will require the payment of a one time maintenance charge equal to the epresent worth' of maintenance costs from the time of acceptance through 1998. 3e A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the District via the Road Department for review and approval prior to recordation of the final map. Grading plans should be approved prior to issuance of grading permits. Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Chiang of this office at 714/787-2333. Very truly yours, cc z Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates NNETH L. EDWARDS k ie] Engine r JbHN H. 'KASHUBA or' Civil Engxneer RC=pln January 180 1989 Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 Riverside County Planning Department Attentionz Ron Goldman County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Vesting Tract 24131 Ladies and Gentlemenz The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions= Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off- site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348. Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B, per Ordinance 655. Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5t side yard setback. Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum side yard setback. Very truly yours, Thomas H. lngram, Director DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020 STAI~ OF CAUr. CXNA--IUSn,4ESS. 11U. NSPC~AT1¢~ AND HOUSeNO AGS~'Y DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIS11UCT I. p.O. IOX 231 !k,e,N IINAIDCNO, C,,A ~ TDO (7~4) 313-4409 "'7- JAN mVERS : axeflY Development Review 08-Riv-79-17.38! Your Reference: VTM 24131 Planning Department Attention Mr. Chris Ormsby County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Mr. Ormsby: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24131 located north of Route 79, between Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road in Rancho California. Please refer to the attached Development Review Form which documents Caltrans' requirements for this project. Conformance with ~hese conditions is required for issuance of an Encroachment Permit. If any work is necessarywithin the state highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District S Permit Office prior to beginning work. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Thomas J. Neville at (714) 383-4384. Very truly yours, H. N. LEWANDOWSKI District Permits Engineer Art. Reference) C~TEa~D~~R~F~M · -- ..-.=: . ....L-}.,. WE WOULD LIXE TO NOTE: ." ":"" C ate kben plans are submitted, please conform to the requirements of the attached "Handout". This will expedite the review process and time required for Plan Check. Although the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal do not appear to have a significant effect on the state highway system, consideration must be given to the ctm~ative effect of continued development in this area. Any measures necessary to mftJiate the etarelative impact of traffic and drainage shall be provided prior to or with development of the area that necessitates them. It appears that the traffic .taw ~ m:-,Oe generated by this proposal could have a significant effect on the state highway system of the area. ,nay measures necessary to mitigate the traffic - e d -: Mm impacts shall be included with the develorxnent. This portion of state highway is included in the California Master Plan of State Highways Eligible for Official Scenic Highway Designation, and in the future your agency may wish to have this route officially designated as a state scenic highway. This portion of state highway has been officially designated as a state scenic highway, and development in this corridor should be compatible with the scenic highway concept. It is recognized that there is considerable public concern about noise levels adjacent to heavily %riveled highways. I~nd development, in order to be compatible with this concern, may require special noise attenuation measures. Development of property should include any necessary noise att=nuation. WE REQUEST THAT TH3E ITEMS CHECKED BEIXI4 BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: Normal right of way dedication to provide half-width on the state highway. Normal street improvements to provide half-width on the state hig~hway. Curb and gutter, State Standard __ along the state highway. Parking shall be prohibited along the state high~y by painting the curb red and/or by the proper placement of "no parking" signs. radius curb returns be provided at intersections with the state highway. Xit~ndard wheelchair ~anp must be provided in t.he returns. A positive vehicular barrier along the property frontage shall be provided to limit physical access to the state highway. Vehicular access shall not be developed directly to the state highwaY. )~ Vehicular access to the state highway shall be pruvided by existing public road connections. .. Vehicular access to the state .~gh~.~. shall be provided by standard driveways. ;., Vehicular access shall not. be provided within of the intersection at Vehicular access to the state bJ~h~y shall be provided by a road-type connection. Form 8-PD19 (Rev. 5/87) :Continued on reverse) Vehicular access connections shall be paved at least vrithin the state highway riF' of ~Y. Acoess points to the state highway shall be developed in a manner that ~rill provide sight di--l~nce for mph along the state Landscaping' along the state highway shall be lo~ and forgiving in nature. highway at Consideration shall be given to'the provision, or future provision,~O signalization and lighting of the-inter~ectton of and the state highway. A traffic study indicating on- and off-site flow patterns and vol~nes, probable impacts, and proposed mitigation measures shall be ~repared. Adequate off-street parking, which does not require backing onto the state highway, shall be provided. Parking lot shall be developed in a manner that will not cause any vehicular movement conflicts, including parking stall entrance and exit, within of the entrance from the state highway. Handicap parking shall not be developed in the busy driveway entrance area:. Care shall be taken when developing this property to preserve and perpetuate the existing drainage pattern of the state highway. Particular consideration should be Riven to c,-nulative increased storm runoff to insure that a highway drainage problurt is not created. ~ny necessary noise ~ttenuation shall be provided as part of the develo~ent of this property. ,~ Please refer to attached additional eounents. WE REQUEST: A copy of any conditions of approval or revised approval. A copy of any documents providing additional state highway right of way upon recordation of the map. WE REQUEST THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW DURING THE APPROVAL PROCESS: Any proposals to further develop this property. A copy of the traffic or envirorsnsntal study. A cheek print of the Parcel or Tract Nap. A check print of the Plans. for any improvements within the state highway right way. A check print of the Grading and Drainage Flans for this property when available. Date: January 3, 1988 Rlv-79-1~.38 VT 24121 (Your Reference) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: This proposal is related to others seen by this office in the recent past ( VT 24133 and VT 24136, Dec 1988 ). Due to the overall size of these related =rac~i and the construczlcn explosion in this general area, th~ contractor/deve~c.~er contrlbute ~ew~rd-the ccsz cf State Hlghway ~mprovemenzs necessary maintain the exlst~n~ trafflc ficw ~n th~s area. In addition, the State recommends the contractor/developer partlc~pate in the F:anrhT villages Assessment Distrlct no. 1~9 and the related EIR Repor~ nc. 241 mIllgaze the impacI~ Delhi generated by ~h~s proposal. "H A N D 0 U T" for ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLANS: ** Introduction - This "handout" is intended to provide the permites with a few guidelines for the design of t~pical roadway improvements and grading proposals within the State right-of-way. It does not contain all the design criteria that may be used in the review of a specific project nor does it contain any treatment for unusal situations which call for special consideration. Additional information and design standards may be found in the following publications: * Caltrans Highway Design Manual, '4th.ed~=ion * AASHTO's "A .Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets", 1984 * Caltrans Standard Plans * Caltrans Standard Specifications ** It should be noted: if any w6rW-<~Se. necessarT=w~=hin the state highway right-of-way, the develoPe["mus=-ub%ain.-an encroachment permit from the district 8 office of the State Department of Transportation prior to beginning the work. .. I. Standards - All work withln the state highway right-of-way shall be to state standards. A general note stating Zhis is required and should be included on the title sheet of the improvement plans. II. General Submittals Required - Street improvement plans or grading plans should be detailed enough to provide the contractor with the necessary information to construct the proposed improvements. In general, the plans should include: *'** Title Sheet - The Title sheet or Cover sheet should lnclude a vicinty map with the project site indicated. The General'and/or Construction notes, legend, quantities, index of sheets and tFp~cal sections should also be included. It should have general notes indicating: --An encroacment permit is required from Caltrans prior to doing any work within the state right-of-way. --All work within the state right-of-way should be state standards. --The structural section indicated for the state highway is for estimating only. Actual section determined after grading and appropriate lab T.I. of should be used in =he design. =- .. ( II. con~.) **** Plan Sheets - These should include and distinguish zhe existing and proposed construction in plan view. Suffic~en= details and dimensions must be included to accurately ascertain the proposed work and how it will "fit" existing conditions. The existing centerline, any monumentation, bearings, distances and stationing should also be included. All dimensions and offsets should be referenced from centerline of state highway at specific stations. Right-of-way and property lines should also be included on the plans. Grading plans should include existing and proposed contours with finish surface (FS) elevations and flowline elevations called out at control points. Cross-slope and side-slope ratios may also be indicated on the plans. The top and toe of side slopes on grading plans must be indicated for the .. proposed grading. The street improvement plans must include the limits and thickness for~ Asphalt concrete overlays, new structural pavement and base. These limits must be delineated with-some method of shading and/or cross-hatching. A trim line or join line between existing and proposed improvements should also be shown. Special details, profiles and sections may be included on the same shee~ if desired. All plans. must include the scale and north arrow, (Caltrans' normal scale is 1"=50', however a scale of 1"=40' is acceptable when required by City or County officials). A scale of 1"=20' should be used for signal plans or whenever greater detail is needed (is; Special Detail plans). ' **** Profiles - These Shodld include the centerline, top of curb, flowline-, trimline or edge of pavement prcfiles if applicable. The horizontal scale should match the plan view and the vertical scale should be 1"=4' or 1"=5' (generally, 1/10 of the horizontal scale), or whatever will provide the detail needed. The profiles should be combined into the plan views using half-plan/half-profile sheets. On grading plans or drainage plans, a profile of drainage- facilities should be provided (channels, pipes, ditches, etc.) et,'~ Cross Sections - Cross sec=ions are required for any s=ree= improvemen=s or for grading within state r~ght-of-way. A section every 50' is required along =he proposed improvement and special sec=ions are required where exis=ing or proposed condi=ions change significan=ly. On projects 200' or less in length, cross sections every are required with a minimum of four cross sections. Special cross sections a= =he con=or of culver=s, drainage inle=s, driveways and road connec=ions may also be necessary. Cross sec=ions mus= show exis=ing ground. or pavemen~ surface and must show proposed pavemen= widening, overlay and grading within the limits of the work. The =hicknose of any structural section or overlay mus= also be shown. Cross sec=ions should indicate both vertical and horizontal scales and must not be disEor~ed by more than a factor of five (ver= = 1/5 of horiz). Existing and proposed elevations should be shown a~ grade .... breaks. Cross slopes between grade breaks should be indicated on the finish surface. Curbs, gutters, driveways and sidewalks should also be indicated. On cross sec=ions, cen~erlines, property lines and righ=-of-way lines are indica=ed by a vertical line and should be labeled accordingly. I= is important ~ha= the cross section stationing correspond to the stationing on the plans and that the work indicated on the cross sections and plans is wi=hin the same limits. ]East rn ,/ unicip al' iter:Di,t -ict D. J..mes 114.d~ia~ tad Sh~,ill D.~ae, el Tk ~t~t.m. T~,~ Riverside Co. P]annin9 Dept. 41:)80 Lemon St,, 9th F]oOr R~vers~de, Ca 9250] SUBJECT: ""T"'2/..cT ?.,,..4, tlt - F-A, !, 't 4. '~, 'IJ - 5,p PI -- t._.{:)C , Iz31 1 The District is responding to your request for comments on the subject project relative to water and/or sewer service. The items checked below apply to this project review. The subject project: /' Is not within EMWD's: / water service area sewer service area / Will be required to construct/provide the following facilities if to be served by EMWD: I !Sewer Service A~y and all necessary regionally sized onsite and offsite gravity sewers and appurtenant works that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot lines/private land. Fee pa)nnent and participation in regional sewers, treatment, and.effluent disposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EHWD regulations will be allowed. EASTERN 14UNICIPAL i~ATER DISTRICT Planning Department 2045 S. Szn_Jaclnm Street · Pos! Office B,,x FI.~O0 · San .)3clnH.,. Callf.rni3 92.~8)-1500 · Telephune (-TN) 925-7676 UNITED STAT~=S POST OFFICE DATE: OUR REF: ~UBJECT: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO: · , RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4080 LEMON ST., 9th FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 FUTURE MODE OF DELIVERY: CENTRALIZED CONTACT WITH' THE U. S. POSTAL SERVICE IS REQUIRED BY DEVELOPER/BUILDER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION FOR DELIVERY TYPE AND LOCATIONS. DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR RiVE:DiDE COUnC.u PLAnnine DEPA CnlEnC DATE: December 28, 1988 ~: Assessor Butldtng and Safety Surveyor - Dave Duda Road Depart~nt Health - Ralph Luchs Fire Protection Flood Control Dtstrtct Fish & Ga~ U,S, Postal Servtce- Ruth E, i~vtdson U,S, Fish & Wtldltfe Services Riverside Count Parks Eastern Munclpa~ Dlstrtct Water Sotuhern California Zdlson VESTING TRACT 24131 - (Sp Pl ) - E.A. Southern California Gas 33433 - Bedford Properties Robert Betn, General Telephone blilltam Frost & Assoc. - Rancho Ca1 Trans .J8 ........ ; .....- ....... ~_ Zlstnore gJnlfled .School.District .'r..' ~Caltfornta Area - First Supervtsortal ..... District - E'ly of Margarita, 5'1y of Walt Abraham Commissioner Pauba - Sp Zone - 105.4 Acres lnt0 441 C.J. Crottnger lots - Schedule A - No Hat vet - (RELATED Co=unity Plans CASE SP) - Nod 119 & 120 - A.P. 923-230-001,002 Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land Division Connittee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for January 23, 1989. If it clears, it will then go to public hearing. Your connents and reco~nendattons are requested prior to January 23, 1989 in order that we my include them in the staff report for this particular case. Should you have any questions regarding this 1tam, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Omsby at 787-1363, Planner CONNENTS: The Elsinore Union.High School District facilities are overcrowded and our educational programs seriously impacted by increasing student population caused by new residential, comnerctal and industrial construction. Therefore, pursuant to California Government Code Section 50380 of AB 2926 and SB 327, this district levies a fee against all new development projects within its boundaries. DATE: 1/4/89 SIGNATURE STREET, 9TM FLOOH RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 Paw. $uperintond~a~,209 UA~I~ SmREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 ~ IN~ TIImI-DIIBAIIITMINTAI, LITTIN UNTY RIVERBIDE · FF.B 1. Q1989 february 9. 1989RNtlq ,_ TO: Chr:is OrBsby, Planner, County Planning FR~: Harc Brwer, Assistant Park Planner, Counter Park~ SUBJECT: Tentative Tracts: 24131, 24132, 24134, 24135, 24136, 24137 Vat1 Neadows SP 219/[2R 235 The RIverside County Parks Departsent appreciates the opportunity to revtew the above referenced and offers the following comn~.~ts: Parks and Recreations The Developcent of the proposed tracts wtll have etnfmal tmpact on extsttng regtonal park facilities. The County Parks Department also has a county-wide recreation trail system. As Indicated by thts departaent's response to S.P. 219/EIR 235, Nay 25, 1988 and the Planntng Departeent's conditions of approval October 4, 1988, the developer was to provide recreation tratls along the south side of the Pauba Road right-of-way and along the north stde of the De Portola Road right-of-way. The latter ts to cross De Portola Road at the developeent's yestern most boundary, follow the boundary due south and exit the stte tnto prtvate property to the west. Tentative tracts 24132 and 24134 ~tll tapaCt the Pauba ROad recreation tratl and tentative tracts 24136 and 24137 will tapaCt De Portola Road Tratl. The above santtoned tracts sake no reference to trails or 'tratl easements. l~e Parks Departsent vtll 'requtre these tratl locations to be sho~n on all tract saps and that they be Faded tn an acceptable sanner. The Parks Department also requests that tt be 11sted as clearanoe agency for aSpS and gradtng planntngs dealtrig vtth thts project. Cultural and Htstortc Resources _lentalive iract 24131, 24]32, z4134, 24135: Conditional approval fs granted for T.T. 24131, 24132, 24134, and 24135 vtth regard to Culturel and Htstortc Resources onli. Conditions for Approval: Should any prehistoric or htstortc resources be discovered or uncovered durtng the gradtrig process, all work tn that area wtll cease untt1 the resource is evaluated by In archaeologist, or historian and mitigation is determined and approved by the History Dtvtston of the Riveraide County Parks Department and the Archaeological Research Unit, University of California, RIvers(de. Tentative Tract 24136: Conditional approval ts granted for T.T, 24136. Conditions for Approval: At the ttme of the alignment of De Portola Road the htstortc resource Rh-3390-H was not knwn. Thts site was found as a result of the Htstory Dtvtston's ortgtnal mitigation for conditional approval of the EZR f219 (Nay 25 1988). Although Rtv-33gO-H ts located south and east of T.T.24136, the realignment of De Portola Road must be resolved before ftnal approval of thts T.T.24136 ts gtven by the Htstory Dtvts(on. Tentative Tract 24137: Conditional Approval ts granted for T.T.24137. Conditions for Approval: Street "A", whtch cuts south and east off De Portola Road, should not be cut or graded, etc., unttl mitigation by data collection ts completed for Rtv-1728, Rtv-1729 and Riv-3391-H. The road wtll tmpact all three of these sttes at present. Any ~ork tn T.T.24137 must avotd parcel 16 and Rtv-1728 untt1 all archaeological work ts completed tn that area. The use of heavy equipment anJr, here south of De Portola Road must be avotded unttl all archaeological work is completed and protective measures are taken to ensure the safety and · futur.e existence of the cultural and htstortc resources tn that area. Protective measures should constst of fenctng around Rtv-3390-H, betng sure not to allow fenctng to te act the stte. All movable surface htstortc resources south of De Pottoga Road should be photographed, recorded and 0 mapped, after ~htch, they my be moved wtthtn the fenced area at Rtv-33g -H. However, the project archieologtst must direct and supervise the movement and placement of these resources to Rtv-33gO-H to me sure thetr placement wtll not tEpaCt the stte. Although T.T.24137 ts vest of Rtv-33gO-H, the reallgmeent of De Portola Road must be resolved and the above conditions met before ftnal ~pproval ts granted to the HIstory DIvision. m/D o3/6s DII~ARTMINI'AL LII'I'IR COUNTY OF RIVERBIDE PLANNZNG DEPARTIqENT January 31, 1989 TO: FRON: RE: Chrts Ormsby - Spectfic Plans Steven A. Kupferman, Engineering Geologist .~ Tentative Tract 24131 Slope Stability Report No. 87 The following report has been revtewed relattve to slope stability at the subject site: 'Slope Stability Analysis, Tentative Tract 24131, The Meadows at Rancho California, Rancho California, CA,' by Converse Consultants, dated December 5, 1988. This report determined that: 1. All slopes proposed for the subject tract at or below a height of 35 feet will be grossly stable. 2. Both cut and fill slopes have a high potential for erosion of sandy materials and resultant surfictal instability. 3. Low strength parameters exist for claystones and siltstones. This report recommended that: 1. Geologic inspection of all cut slopes should be-conducted during grading. 2. Buttress ftlls my be required for cut slopes with adverse mtertals or conditions. Proposed slopes at the Site should be planted soon after construction and wtll requtre maintenance to perfom tn a satisfactory manner through ttme. This report satisfies the General Plan requirement for a slope stability report. The recommendations in this report shall be adhered to in the design and construction of this project. SAK:rd RIVERS/DE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF DETEP, HINATION Case .o. EA No. NEGATIVE DECLARATION Based on the Initial Study, it has been determined that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect. PROJECT DESCRIP. TION AND LOCATION: See Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director C~PLETED ~te ~L~q '/ Tttle ..................... ......... Case ,o.(~d)~V{~} ~ ~ Z~( Land Dtv Sch Appl/Rep ~J~,r < ~ ~velopable Lots ~te Subm~tte IZ-N-~ Open Space Lo~ Existing Zones Changes of Pmeosed Zones Only Zoning Acreage ADOPTED Conxnission Area Planning Council P'll'~ning Director (Other) Pla.,v,,., 7'n' Date Dev. Ac O.Sp. Ac HEARING BODY OR OFFICER O Bard of Supervisors ~lanning Comnission C) Area Planning Council D PllWning Director C) (Other) NOTICE OF DETERNINATION ACTION ON PROJECT D/Xpproval Date . Developable Lots Dev,Ac Open Space Lots IS O.Sp, Ac Changes of Approved Zones Only Zones Acreage The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration Person verifying t ~2 Title T~/z~^,,/'TTr' RI .IDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 408u LIENON STREET, 9TH FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 Witits OTii~u~al - Cmxnt), Clsl-k camar~ - Case 1mile ~tnk - Sc~cduZ~ :IEVE:DEDE counc -PLAnninG DEPA CmEn ENVIR~~AL ASSESSMENT FORM: STANDARD EVALUATION ENVmOeN~NTAL AmJ8358MENT (F_A,) NUMBEI~ 33433 PROJECT CASE TYPE(a) AND NUMBERS(m) Vestinq Tract 24131 AI~W,r_,qNT$. NAMF; Bedford Properties NAME OFPERSONim)PREPARING Eid Chris 0rmby, Planner III L PROJECT INFORMATION A. t)F, SCI:IFTION (ktdude m-_pQmmcf ~jd~ lot size end mesas applicable): within approved Specific Plan No. 219 MODULE NUMBER(m) 119 & 120 The site is located TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES ASSESSO R~J PARCEL NC).(s):. 105,4 923' 230-001,002 D. EXISTING ZONING: E. PROPOSED Z(pNING: F. STREET REFERENCES: SP E) THE PRC)POSN. IN CONFORMANCE? __ " IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMAlICE? Fa~t of Margprita Rd:' .~nuth nf Pauba Rd: North of Highway 79 ~IECTIOI~TOWN~HIPoRANGE DESCRIPTION OR AllACH A LEGALDESCRIFTION: Township 8~ Range 2W The site is comprised of rolling hills. ThP ~itp ts vacant at thi~ timp. t COMPREHENSIVE GENERAl. PLAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION Chack IM ~';.,4xilm optkan(m) below and f,,~cmm~ accordingly. [] All or ;art of ~he project site Is in 'Adopted Specific PlanL" "REMAP' mx "Rancho Vili~es Communlt mmt~q~Areat. Cempmee~m,N(B mnd CmM, Vmnd Vt D Mortaert ofllm pfoiec~mdim ls in"Ai Not DefJgnated ms OIDen SMcxl'. ~xn;dete SecikDrm nt, N (A, Band Dcdy%Vmd VL ~ AI or Wl m:4 line ~ elm has an Open Slate and ~ deeignmt~ cmlhe ~man ~moee m!~ C{w,~Iet, P,;jI~m I~N(A,B, mNI Eonly~V m~I Vi- . e , .. m ENYIRONMENTAL K"~P'_.s~, AND RF,~OURCES A,I~ESIMENT HAZARDS IN Nqutst.PdoloSpecklStudiesorCountyFeu~t 12. N AirpodNota(lrlg. n.le,%,.18.11 Heard h (Rg. VL1) & Vt.12 & 1984 NCUZ Report, M.A.F.B.) ~ Ps u n e'~.~l (~ A · C D ~.~.~ 2~ Lkauefactke~Zone(FiO. VL1) 13. N Re~iroedNoise(Flg. V1.13-W.16) ~ s Ps u . e~o.~.41 ~ A · C O ~O.~.~ 3. TZB Groun_d~'~bgZone(FlgVl.1) 14. N ~h 4. Y 15. S,N 7. N 10, X 11-N (r~o. W.6) ~ VLa) 16. N 17.. Y 18. Y 19. hi 20. N 21. H 22. N 23. N 24. 25. Obher Noise NA A B C D (Fig, %/1.11) Project Generatec~ Noise Affecting Noise Sensitive Uses Fig. VI. 11 ) Noise Sena~tiv~ Proiect (F~g. W.11 ) Air Quality Iml:~ls From Project Project Sensitive to Air QueJity Water QuNity Impacts From Project Project Sensitive to Water Quality Hazardous MatedaJs end Wastes Hazardous Fire Area (Fig. VI.30 - VI.31 ) Other RESOURCES 27, InetNMrmJledcullurelPresefve II. N Seek Ine'k,/.ay, (Fig. VLaS) I. btodc Resources (Fig. YL32 - W.33) Arc~aeQIogi~.aJ RekNrces (F~O. VL32-V1.33&VI.46-VIA8) (PiJ~onl:doik::eJ Reeoun::ee Ma~) Definitions for Lend Use StiRability end Noise Acceptability Ratings NA - Net ,,ppre'-'s $ - Generily Suitable PS - Proviekmally Suitable U - ~Uneuleble R - rteeb::|Bd A - GeneallyAu:el~eble No. 219 9, Ij~LEPLANI~AREA; Southwest Territory Land Use Planninq Area · ~I~~FANY: Mr. Palomer 0bservatorv Street Lightinq Policies & C0MMLIaWPt~IFANY: Southwest Area Plan (under study) & C(~ PLAN DESKiNA~X IF ANY: 81~OFpC~AFFECTINGpROFC)-m. The comprehensive policies and project design component described in Specific Plan No. 21g are applicable to the project. More specifically, the focus of applicable policies is on Planning Areas 15 and 22. 'ihese areas encompass the entire tract. For M rm ~k ,-rl. laidGale wflh · y~s (Y) or no (N) wheffier any public fac~fities and/or geevices issues may lignff'r, antty mffec~. {x be mffecMd by the r-~;:mml. NI ,,JmrrF,;d figures rare ~ntmin~ in IN Comprehensive Genmt~ Plan. For tony tm marked ym (Y). write data mun:m. m0mnc:ms consulted, finclings of fact, and mitigation measures urgler bcton V. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES 1- v Cilm, illi(mOqg. N.l-IV.11. DilGulsln 10- 8r..V ExtsUn9, Revel l ~ IlaTmb0qg. N.12-1V.!3) 11,_..Y. 3~_ Weler0qiencyl.elem) 17- Y a v 8emmmmr~Lmmmm) 13__Y. FiI~ehi:II~N.18-N.18) 14. Y L IldSm(Fi~N.17-N.18) tlede O mig. NAT. W. ll) Imtrl i Omqi. N.11. Immkm md Pmteeim (FIg. N.19. Na))) 7..y_ Eque~imn Trails (Fi9. N.19 - N241 Riv. C~ 800 $c~e Ecluemran Trail Maps) b (F'mg. N25 - N.26) ~ (Fig. N.11 - N.18) Hee~ $ervioe (F'mg. N.11 - N.18) Aklxx'~ (F'mg. IL18.2 - IL18.4, ImlM - 1.18.10 · N.27 - N36) 15,_..y, ~ R,_;m,.A mmm G. IdorpeftdhprolectMiixadedln',~tfa.-ludS;ac:lTcPlin'."REMAP'of'1:tanchoVlage~~~ kmeV', medeme In dmml IM epedlk poldmmm 'v r~,~ le me ~c~m~ end c~,, 4m fa.:Ym~g: Adopted Spec ic lan No. ~ the 1. MIhemlBenllm'dumdmi~fJ~(m): egleenloreconmaslmtwlmeeCen~xmGenetlPmn? ~noL,__eg~_.: t~e pro~~ co t with the policies and designations of adopted Specmfic Plan No. ZlV. s INFORMATION IOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIG&q'ION MEASURES ADDITIONAL IFCXIMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL Ae~FSgMEhrr CAN BE ~MPL.ETED: DATE DATE ADEQUACY 8ECTN:IN/ -- I'¢FORMATION. ICFDRMATION ICFORMATION ISSUE NO. REQUIRED REQUESTED RECEIVED For each issue marked yes (Y) under Sections IILB Ind N.B, Identify N Section and issue number and clo the ktowing, in Ihe format u shown below:. 1. List all add~ relevant data sources, Including agencies =onsulted. 2. State il fira:l'mgs of fact regarding environmental concerns. 3. Slate specific mitigation measures, If identifiable without requiring an environmental impact report (E.I.R.) 4, ff additional information is requirm:l before the environrnentaJ Issesament can be completed, refer to Sul:ee;r0n A. 5. If additional sheets are needed to complete this section, check Ihe box It the end of the section ancl attach ZIZB.3 The SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OFFACT, M~IGATION MEASURES: General Plan designation for land use suitability pertaining to O~O,mnHCh~king i¢ ~.itahlp Pnt~nt~l imp~rt~ r~n hp mitigatpd tn ~n acceptable level throuqh conformance with the Uniform Building Code and County ordinances.' IIIB.4,8 Potential siqnificant impacts related to slopes and erosion includes'the visual appearance of permanently altered land forms. severe erosion of urtprotected slooes and oossible SlOPe instability. The potential impact pertaining to visual appearance is mitigated by Development Standards outlined in Section IIIA.6 of Specific Plan No. 219. The potential for erosion is being studied in'a slope stability study and the development of specific requirements for alluvial/colluvial removal at the tract staqe. Temporary groundcover will be provided to prevent erosion during the IIIB.I? construction phase as indicated in EIR No. 235. Potential noise impacts will be determined by noise rnnd.rt~d alnr~g rn~HwaJf~. Mitigation will include wall and any other recommended by the noise study. ~pnrting i~ r~qUired. studies to be heiqht of attention Monitoring and U @ -.,/ · ' ! ill *~).***:~- :' ,sl CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 24131-2 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL Maintenance Retention Monument Security FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY $ 691,500 207,500 183,500 $ 1,082,500 $ 108,500 $ 22,000 DATE: May 24, 1994 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY 346,000 104,000 92,000 542,000 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee Fire Mitigation Fee - Bond Received Signal Mitigation Fee - Bond Received Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees N/A Exempt 37,200 13,950 N/A T.B.D.* SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Letter of Map Revision (LOMAR Review) Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due · T.B.D. - To be determined 235.00 8.00 3,430.00 N/A 1,100.00 N/A 4,773.00 0.00 -4- r:\agdrpt\94\0524\24131-2.agn KENNETH L, EDWARDS GENERAL MANAG(,R.CH(F F, NGINEF, R RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT September 17, 1993 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE. CA 92501.1719 (909) 275-1200 (909) 788-9965 FAX City of Temecula Public Works Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92591 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: The Meadows Paloma Del Sol West This-letter is sent at the request of Michael A. Tylman of Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates. The following referenced tracts are not within the boundaries of the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan. No area drainage plan fees are required for these developments. TRACTS 24131-1, 2, 3 & F 24133-1, 2, 3, 5 & F 24134-3 & F 24135-1, 2, 3 & F 24136-1, 2, 3 & F Portions of the following tracts are within the boundaries, for which fees have been paid. The remainder of these same tracts are not subject to any fees: TRACTS 24132-1 & F 24133-4 24134-1 & 2 Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at 909/275-1265. ~H~RD L.' DIC~RSON J Senior Civil Engineer c: Michael A. T~-lman, RBF SK:slj sk10917a RESTATEMENT AND AMENDMENT OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING "BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA and BEDFORD DEVELOPM'ENT COMPANY and MESA HOMES '(Park Fees) 2. 3. 5. 6.~ ?. 8. 9. 10. 11. 1~. 15. 16. 19. 20. ~1. 1NDEX Page Amend Development Agreement ............................. 4 Eastside Tract Maps .................................... 5 Cost of Litigation ...................................... 5 Public Facilities Fees Shortfall .............................. 6 Reimbursement of Fees ................................... 6 Parks, Greenbelts and Paseos ............................... '6 Main Recreation Areas ................................... 7 Remaining Open Space Areas ............................... 8 Timing of Park Improvements and Transfer to City .................. 8 Fee Credits .......................................... 9 Standstill Agreement .................................... 9 Park Fee Obligation ..................................... 10 10 ~urisdiction and Attorneys' Fees ............................. Severability .......................................... 10 Entire Agreement ...................................... 10 Construction ......................................... l0 Amendment of Agreement ................................. 11 ll Time of the Essence .................................... No Precommitment ..................................... 11 11 Pay Under Protest ..................................... ; · ll Superseding ......................................... Counterparts ......................................... 12 07-30-92 1222'$ -000/+9 G: \DO(;\ 152\9201 0026 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT "A" - MAP OF PARKS, PASEOS, GREENBELTS 07- 30- 92 12221 - 00049 G: \DOC\ 152\92010026. NO6 RESTATEMENT AND AMENDMENT OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (Quimby Park Fees) This Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding CMOU") is entered into by and between the City of Temecula ("City") and Bedford Development Company and Mesa Homes (collectively "Bedford") to be effective on August 11, 1992, with reference to the following: RECITALS A. City and Bedford have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding effective January 31, 1992. City and Bedford wish to restate and amend the Memorandum of Understanding to modify certain provisions due to changed circumstances. B. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864, et seq. "'Development Agreement Statutes"), Bedford and the County of Riverside ("County") entered into Development Agreement No. 4 recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County on November 7, 1988, as Instrument No. 3255 13 ("Development Agreement"). C. The Development Agreement encompasses a project formerly located within County approved Specific Plan No. 219 ("Specific Plan") known as "Paloma del Sol", a mixed use subdivision project to be developed on property owned by Bedford which became a part of the municipal boundaries of the City when the City incorporated on December 1, 1989. D. Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement Statutes, the City became the successor-in-interest to the County under the Development Agreement upon incorporation of the City. E. A dispute has arisen between the City and Bedford over the amount of fees or land dedication for park or recreational purposes Bedford is required to provide to City as allowed under Section 66477 of the California Government Code C Quimby Park Fees"). 07-30-92 12221-000~9 G: \DOC\ 152\92010026 F. On May 20, 1987, the County amended Ordinance No. 460 authorizing the imposition of Quimby Park Fees. Ordinance No. 460 required adoption of an implementation resolution designating a recipient of the Quimby Park Fees. On June 28, 1988, pursuant to Resolution No. 88-218, the County designated CSA 143 as the recipient of Quimby Park Fees subject to the adoption of a master plan. On June 27, 1989, pursuant to Resolution No. 89-331, the County adopted a master plan for CSA 143, establishing the Quimby Park Fees at three (3) acres per 1,000 new residents ("County Park Fee Standard"). G. Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-53, adopted on May 8, 1990, City has adopted Quimby Park Fees of five (5) acres of land for parks and recreational purposes, or payment of fees in lieu thereof, for every 1,000 people to reside in the proposed subdivision ("City Park Fee Standard"). H. The City interprets the Development Agreement to permit the imposition of increased Quimby Park Fees computed on the City Park Fee Standard and has required Bedford to pay Quimby Park Fees based on the City Park Fee Standard as a condition of issuance of building permits for Paloma del Sol. Bedford disagrees with this position and interprets the provisions of the Development Agreement to limit the City's authority to impose Quimby Park Fees based on the park and open space requirements of the Specific Plan as approved by the County and incorporated into the Development Agreement. I. In order to avoid a legal challenge to the Quimby Park Fees and to prevent the running of any relevant statutes of limitation while attempts are being made to resolve this dispute, Bedford and City have entered into a Standstill Agreement effective on April 9, 1991, as amended ("Standstill Agreement"). J. City and Bedford acknowledge that development of Paloma del Sol will result in a generation of significant municipal revenue, public infrastructure facilities and the enhancement of the quality of life, including recreation facilities for present and future residents of the City. The benefits to the City and Bedford contemplated by Paloma del Sol include: (1) the opportunity for a high quality residential-commercial project creating significant job opportunities, sales tax and ad valorera tax revenues for the City; 07-30-92 12221-000~9 G: \DOC\152\92010026. I,K:)6 2 (2) payment of substantial impact fees to 'be used to solve City and regional traffic infrastructure demands; (3) (4) (5) a payment of public facilities fees; participation in special assessment and/or community facilities districts to finance City and regional infrastructure improvements; the creation of significant park, recreation and open space dedications for public use and the protection of significant natural resources. K. It is contemplated that the Specific Plan will be amended (Amendment No. 3) to: (i) add an 8+ acre neighborhood park at the southeast comer of De Portola Road and "H" Street; (ii) change the target density for Planning Area 6 up to 19.8 du/ac; 3.nd (iii) clarify the intent of the Specific Plan to be consistent with the terms and conditions of the approved vesting tentative map for Paloma del Sol. L. The new 8 + acre park to be dedicated by Bedford to the City is located in Planning Area 6 of the Specific Plan. Planning Area 6 provides for development of 37.8 acres with Very High density residential use at a maximum total of 590 dwelling units. At such time as the Specific Plan is amended to delineate the 8+ acre park, the remainder of Planning Area 6 will be reduced to 29.8 acres. Thereafter, development of Planning Area 6 up to the maximum number of 590 residential dwelling units will fall within the allowable Density Range of 14-20 du/ac of the Specific Plan but not within the target density of 15.6 du/ac unless the target density for Planning Area 6 is amended to 19.8 du/ac as part of Specific Plan Amendment No. 3. M. The City and Bedford acknowledge that due to the present economic recession, none of these benefits to the City are possible unless the Paloma del Sol project proceeds with development. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the present structure of fees and private recreation and open space requirements creates substantial impediments to development of Paloma del Sol. 07-30-92 12221-000/,9 G:\DOC\152\92010026.N06 3 N. Without admitting or determining any fights or obligations as between City and Bedford, each to the other, with respect to the amount of the Quimby Park Fees, and solely to avoid the potential expense and inconvenience of protracted litigation, and to balance the needs of the City to provide adequate parks and recreational facilities with the difficulty of land development in today's economy, City and Bedford agree to settle this matter based on the terms and conditions of this MOU. AGREEMENT 1. Amend Development Agreement. In accordance with the procedures set forth in the Development Agreement Statutes, City and Bedford shall commence the necessary proceedings to consider amending the Development Agreement to: eliminate the County Public Facilities and Services Mitigation Fee and replace it with a City Public Facilities Fee; provide that for a period of two (2) years from the date of recording the amendment to the Development Agreement, the City Public Facilities Fee shall be paid in lieu of the Regional Statistical Area Fee CRSA Fee") established by County Ordinance No. 659 adopted by the City and in lieu of the County Public Facilities Fee set forth in the Development Agreement; provide that for a period of two (2) years from the date of recording the amendment to the Development Agreement, the City Public Facilities Fee shall be Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) per each residential unit ("Interim Public Facilities Fee" as applied to the development of Paloma del Sol whether constructed by Bedford or any other merchant builder purchasing Paloma del Sol tracts from Bedford. Bedford shall pay K-Rat, fire, traffic signal and drainage mitigation fees; 07-30-~ 1~1-000z,9 G: '~1)0C\152\92010026 provide that after said two year period the amount of the Interim Public Facilities Fee shall be increased up to the amount of the City's Public Facilities Fee imposed on all projects in the City at that time. In the event the City has not adopted a City Public Facility Fee by the end of said two year period, Bedford shall continue to pay the Interim Public Facilities Fee until such time as the City adopts a City Public Facilities Fee; provide that Bedford will be subject to paying a City Public Facilities Fee for non-residential development in the Paloma del Sol project in accordance with the provisions of the City's non- residential Public Facilities Fee ordinance. In the event the City has not adopted a Public Facilities Fee for non-residential development at the time of issuance of building permits for commercial construction, Bedford agrees to abide by the City's procedures relating to payment of future non-residential Public Facilities Fees applicable to all projects in the City in effect at that time; and provide that the park land and recreation facilities to be dedicated to the City as contemplated by this MOU shall fully satisfy Bedford's obligation to pay Quimby Park Fees and to provide parks and recreational facilities for the Paloma del Sol project consistent with the Sp~ific Plan and this MOU. 2. Eastside Tract Maps. City shall cooperate in commencing the necessary proceedings in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act to amend the Paloma del Sol "Eastside" Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 24182, 24184, 24185, 24186, 24187 and 24188 with no new conditions inconsistent with the terms of the Specific Plan as may be amended and this MOU, including the 8-Acre Park described in Section 7(a) of this MOU. Neither party waives its rights as to what constitutes "consistency" with the Specific Plan. 3. Cost of Litigation. In the event the County seeks to challenge the right of City and Bedford to enter into this MOU or to amend the Development Agreement and institutes an action, suit or proceeding to challenge this MOU or invalidate and/or enjoin the 07-30-92 12,2_.2.1 G: \I)OC \ 152\92010026 enforcement of this MOU or the amendment to the Development Agreement or take such other action(s) which result in unreasonable delays in the development of the Paloma del Sol project, the parties agree to cooperate and participate in a joint defense in any action against the parties, their officers, agents and employees, from any and all such obligations, liability, suit, claim, loss, judgment, lien, resulting from such action(s) brought by County (but excluding actions to expunge any lis pendens) and to share equally the costs associated with attorneys' fees, costs and damages that the parties may incur as a result of any such actions or lawsuit to challenge City and/or Bedford's legal authority to enter into this MOU and/or amend the Development Agreement. In the event the County prevails in any such litigation after exhaustion of any procedural appeals, the provisions relating to the payment of Interim Public Facilities Fees as set forth in this MOU and/or the amendment to the Development . Agreement shall terminate. 4. Public Facilities Fees Shortfall. In the event the County prevails in any legal action or other proceeding to challenge, set aside, or enjoin the enforcement of the amendment to the Development Agreement and a court or other tribunal having jurisdiction over the matter after all appeals are taken, determines that Bedford and/or the City is liable to make up any shortfall in the amount of the Public Facilities and Services Mitigation fees owned by City and/or Bedford to County, then City and Bedford shall each share equally in paying any such shortfall. 5. Reimbursement of Fees. If prior to the amendment to the Development Agreement and in the event Bedford is required to pay public facilities fees and/or RSA fees in an amount greater than the amount set forth in the amendment to the Development Agreement, Bedford shall be entitled to reimbursement of the difference in the amount of the fees paid within thirty (30) days of the date of recordation of the Amendment to the Development Agreement. 6. Parks. Greenbelts and Paseos. As additional consideration for entering into this MOU, Bedford agrees to dedicate to the City, or cause to be dedicated, and City agrees to accept when offered, park land, greenbelts, slopes and paseos equalling approximately 166.5 acres. Bedford and the Paloma del Sol Association ("Association") may also dedicate approximately 27.5 acres of park land and paseos to the City. The park land, greenbelts, slopes and paseos are described on Exhibit A which is attached and made a part hereof and incorporated by this reference. 07-30-9"Z 12221-00049 G: ",,DOC\ 152%92010026. NO6 6 7. Main Recreation Areas. The six main recreation areas and the terms for dedication to the City are described as follows: (a) An eight-acre park located in Specific Plan Planning Area No. 6 and within Tentative Tract 25417 (8-Acre Park) will be improved with two basebail diamonds/soccer field combination with lights, restroom and concession building, group picnic area, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot. Co) A seven and seventy-four hundredths (7.74) acre park located in Tract 24133-2, Lot 114 ("7.74 Acre Park") will be improved as a "passive park" and may be dedicated to the City in Bedford's sole discretion sometime in the future. (c) A thirteen and eighty-four hundredths (13.84) acre paseo park located in Tract 24133-3, Lot 106 ("13.84 Acre Paseo Park") currently improved with tot lots, basketball courts, tennis court, picnic areas with tables and barbecues, waikways/bikeways with lighting and may be dedicated to the City at sometime in the future at Bedford's discretion and after receiving the prior consent of at least a majority of the members of the Association. (d) An approximate five and nine tenths (5.9) acre paseo park located in Tract 24134-3, Lots 68, 69, 70, 71 and a portion of Lot 83 of Tract 24134-F ("5.9 Acre Paseo Park") currently improved with a tot lot, basketbail court, picnic areas with tables and barbecue, waik-ways/bikeways with lighting. This park is owned by the Association and may at the discretion of the Association be dedicated to the City-sometime in the future. (e) A seven and forty-four hundredths (7.44) acre park located in the Eastside (future) Tract 24186-4, Lot 1 ("7.44 Acre Park") planned to be improved with a combination soccer/baseball field with lights, restrooms and concession building, group picnic area, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot. (f) A nine and thirty-five hundredths (9.35) acre paseo park located in the Eastside (future) Tracts including: Lots 159 and 160 of (future) Tract 24186-1; Lots 121 and 129 of (future) Tract 24186-2 and Lot 121 of (future) Tract 24187-F ("9.35 Acre 07-30-92 12221-000~9 G: ~,.DOC\ 152 \92010026. NO6 7 Paseo Park") planned to be improved with a basketball court, tot lot, picnic area, walkway/bikeways with lighting landscaping and irrigation. 8. Remaining Open Space Areas. (a) The remaining recreation and open space areas consist of 142 acres of greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, public parkway and slope landscaping, both east and west sides of Paloma del Sol. (b) Those perimeter and interior greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, parks and slopes shown on Exhibit A which are transferred to the City will be maintained by the Temecula Community Services District CTCSD"). All assessments for maintenance shall be in compliance with the standards and formulas imposed by the TCSD on a city- wide basis. 9. Timing of Park Improvements and Transfer to City. (a) The 8-Acre Park shall be fully improved and transferred to the City as soon as December 31, 1992, but no later than March 31, 1993. Additional street improvements to De Portola and construction of Campanula Way adjacent to the 8-Acre park will be completed as development of the adjoining tracts occurs, but not later than five (5) years from the date of the amendment of the Development Agreement. (b) Improvement to the 7.44-Acre Park shall commence at the time of development of the adjoining tracts (Tract Nos. 24186-1, 2, 3, 4 and Final). Improvements to the 9.35-Acre Paseo Park shall commence at the time of development of the adjoining tracts (Tract Nos. 24186-1, 2 and Final). Improvements to the 7.44 Acre Park and the 9.35-Acre Paseo Park shall be completed on or before the issuance of 50 % of the certificates of occupancy for the dwelling units constructed in the.adjoining tracts. Both of these parks shall be transferred to the City in accordance with the current TCSD funding procedures and practices. (c) Improvement to and transfer of the remaining 142 acres of greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, public parkway and slope landscaping, both East and 07-30-92 12221-0004,9 G: M)OC\ 152\92010026, Re)6 8 Nest sides of Paloma del Sol shall occur with the completion of development of the adjoining tracts and in accordance with the current TCSD funding procedures and practices. (d) Bedford may extend the improvement completion and park transfer dates as set forth in this MOU with written consent from the City. (e) City shall receive and approve all park and recreation facilities improvement plans in accordance with the City's park standards, procedures and specifications except the City shall accept without any modifications to the improvements to the 13.84-Acre Paseo Park and the 5.9-Acre Paseo Park as currently constructed and installed provided these parks are transferred to the City. (f) The approximately 194 acres of parks, greenbelts and paseos shall be transferred to the City by grant deeds from Bedford and the Association, depending on ownership. City agrees to accept the parks and any improvements within a reasonable time of being offered for dedication. The City shall be responsible for establishing any maintenance obligations with the TCSD associated with the parks, paseos and greenbelt · reas described in this MOU. 10. Fee Credits. At the time of completion of the improvements and transfer of each of the public parks as provided in this MOU, Bedford shall receive a credit against payment of future City Public Facilities Fees based on the actual improvement cost incurred by Bedford for each of said public parks up to a maximum credit of Two Million DOllars ($2,000,000). City shall have a right to review, audit and verify all costs associated 'with said park improvements under procedures to be mutually agreed upon between the paxties. 11. Standstill Agreement. Until the Development Agreement is amended as contemplated by this MOU, the Standstill Agreement shall govern the rights and obligations of the parties with regards to Quimby Park Fees associated with the Paloma del Sol project, except that it shall be amended to remain in full force and effect until a certificate of occupancy is issued by the City for the 500th residential dwelling unit in the Paloma del Sol project. 07-30-9Z 12221-00049 G:~DOC\152\9ZO10026.M06 12. Park Fee Obligation. Upon execution of this MOU by the paxties, regardless of undue delays or the outcome of any lawsuit or action brought by County or terms of setfiement of any action or proceeding which may be instituted by the County against City and/or Bedford relating to this MOU or the amendment to the Development Agreement, Bedford's Quimby Park Fee obligation for the Paloma del Sol project shall be satisfied based on the requirements provided in Sections 6, 7 and 8 of this MOU excluding Tract 24183 which currently satisfies the City Park Fee Standard. Bedford's Quimby Park Fee obligation with regard to Planning Area 6, as shown on Exhibit A, up to the maximum number of 590 attached residential units permitted by the Specific Plan Density Range shall also be satisfied. 13. Jurisdiction and Attorneys' Fees. This MOU is made and entered into in the State of California, and this MOU, and any rights, remedies, or obligations provided for herein shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 14. Severability. If any portion, provision or part of this MOU is held, determined, or adjudicated to be invalid, unenforceable, or void for any reason whatsoever, each such portion, provision, or part shall be severed from the remaining portions, provisions, or parts of this MOU and shall not affect the validity or enforceability of such remaining portions, provisions, or parts. 15. Entire Agreement. This MOU contains the entire understanding and agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the matters referred to herein. No other representations, covenants, undertakings Or other prior to contemporaneous agreements, oral or written, respecting such matters, which are not specifically incorporated herein, shall be deemed in any way to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. The parties hereto acknowledge that each party has not executed this MOU in reliance on any such promise, representation, or warranty. 16. Construction. This MOU shall not be construed against the party preparing it, but shall be construed as if both parties joinfly prepared this MOU and any uncertainty and ambiguity shall not be interpreted against any one party. 07-30-92 12221-000~9 G: \DOC\152\92010026.1406 ]. 0 17. Amendment of Agreement. This MOU shall not be modified by either party by oral representation made before or after the execution of this MOU. All modifications must be in writing and signed by the parties, and each of them. 18. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence for the performance of each and every covenants and the satisfaction of each and every condition contained in this MOU. 19. No Precommitment. City and Bedford understand and agree that certain actions of the City contemplated by this MOU will require compliance with legal procedures regulations and public hearings accompanied by discretionary decisions. The parties acknowledge that nothing contained in this MOU shall be construed as a precommitment or requiring the City Planning Commission or City Council to approve any discretionary actions contemplated by this MOU. 20. Pay Under Protest. This will acknowledge that as agreed to in the January 31, 1992 MOU, Bedford has withdrawn its notices of payment of permit fees under protest and terminated the Standstill Agreement relating to said fees. 21. Superseding. This MOU shall supersede, amend, and restate the Memorandum of Understanding effective January 31, 1992, and shall control the rights, duties and obligations of the parties as to the subject matter of this MOU. 07-30-92 12221-00{}49 r,:~DOC\152x,92010026.~06 11 22. Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. ATTEST: June Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA BY:~ ~ Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor Csaba F. Ko, Vice President MESA HOMES, a Califor~~_r, poration Wiil'iam M. Butler, President 07-30-92 122221-000049 G:\DOC\152\92010026.M06 12 ITEM NO. 7 APPROVAL ~_~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 24, 1994 Acceptance into the City-Maintained Storm Drain System - Storm Drain Facilities within a Portion of Lot 273 of Tract Map 3883 (APN 919-200- 010) Abutting Calls Fiesta PREPARED BY: ~ Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM - STORM DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN A PORTION OF LOT 273 OF TRACT MAP 3883 (APN 919-200-010) ABUTTING CALLE FIESTA BACKGROUND: On May 10, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved an Offer of Dedication for a storm drain easement across Lot 273 of Tract Map 3883. Calls Fiesta was permitted and constructed under the County of Riverside jurisdiction. Currently, Calle Fiesta collects surface drainage from abutting properties as well as street drainage and then deposits the collected flow at the end of Calle Fiesta, across Lot 273 of Tract Map 3883, into a natural drainage course. Over the years, the property has suffered erosion damage due to the street runoff. The property owner has constructed, to City Standards, an inlet on Calls Fiesta and an eighteen- inch (18") RCP storm drain pipe across the northwest portion of Lot 273 of Tract Map 3883 that outlets into a natural drainage course. pwOS~agdrpt~94\0524~drain.acp FISCAL IMPACT: $290 annually for catch basin maintenance. Sufficient funds are available in Public Works Drainage Facilities Maintenance Account No. 100-164-999-5401. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 94- 2. Location Map 3. Offer of Dedication with Exhibits "A-B",. inclusive. pwO5~egdrpt~94'~O524~lrain.ecp RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RF_,SOL~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM - STORM DRAIN FACH.,ITIES WITHIN A PORTION OF LOT 273 OF TRACT MAP 3883 (APN 919-200- 010) ABU'ITING CALLE FIESTA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLd, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the property owner has offered for dedication to the City, a portion of Lot 273 of Tract Map 3883, and the Offer of Dedication has been recorded as Instrument No. WHEREAS, the property owner has improved to City Standards, storm drain facilities within that portion of LOt 273 of Tract Map 3883, the legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit "A" and is depicted in Exhibit "B" . WHF~REAS, the City desires to accept into the City-maintained storm drain system the improved storm drain facilities within that portion of Lot 273 of Tract Map 3883 as depicted in Exhibit "B"; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVi~ by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temecuh accept into the City-maintained storm drain system those storm drain facilities within that portion of Lot 273 of Tract Map 3883 described in Exhibits 'A" and "B' attached hereto. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the Offer of Dedication for the property described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVF. D, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 241h day of May, 1994. Ron Roberrs, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk pwO5%agdrpt%94%O524~lrein.ecp [SHALl STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMF, CULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of May, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: CO~CILMEMBERS: CO~CILMEMBERS: CO~CILMEMBERS: CO~CILMI~-~ERS: pwO5%e~drpt%94%O524%drein.acp EXHIBIT 'A' TO RESOLUTION N0.94- Accepling into the City-maintained storm drain system, storm drain facilities within a portion of Lot 273 of Tract Map 3883 (APN 919-200-010) abutting Calle Fiesta (Legal description attached) 25' DRAINAGE EASEMENT AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER A PORTION OF LOT 273 OF TRACT MAP 3883, RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 63, PAGES 1 THROUGH 35, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY 25.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 273. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: JAMES A. DRENON P.L.S. 6153 EXP. 3/31/98 DATE EXHIBIT 'B' TO RESOLUTION NO. 94- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE - STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES WITHIN A PORTION OF LOT 273 OF TRACT MAP 3883 (APN 919-200-010)ABUTTING CALLE FIESTA (Plat Attached) DRA INA GE EASEMENT Lo ,','r4 I LOT 275 ~,~ or't- · '~,8~' '1 ' "' ~ ""R' -.,,,' " . ./ 4~ENGINEEi:IING VENTURES 43500 FUDGE PARK DI:!IV~ SUfl'~ 202 o (714) 699-6450 TEMECt. A.A. CA 92590 LOCATION MAP (Map Attached) OFFER OF DEDICATION - STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF LOT 273 OF TRACT MAP 3883 (APN 919-200-010)ABUTTING CALLE FIESTA (Offer Attached) ~i~.*' ' ' ;' RNG. SEC. C~RTIFICAT; OF ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT (Government Code $ectbn 27281 ) Dated: IS IS TO CERTIFY that the interact In real property granted by the easement dated tc t~e CITY OF TEMECULA, |e hereby accepted for tJ~e pml~ose o~ veerjr~ b in the City of Teme~ule on behatl of the publi~ by the undersigned behalf of th~ CJty Counci pursuant to the authority centak~ed b County Ordb~anee No. 669. Grantee consents to recoedetlon thereof by its duty authorized olfT~er Tim D. Set'at' RCE 28738 Exp. 913019a, City Engineer C2~y of Temecula ROAD NAME THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CrlY OF TEMECULA AND ENTITLED TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. (GOV. CODE 6103) PROJECT NAME FOR RECORDER'S USE W.O. · RETURNTO: CITY OFTEMECULA 4317&Buaineae Park De Teme~da, CA 92590 EASEMENT grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for over, upon, across, and within the real prope~ in the CiW of Temecula, State of California, described as follows: Property Owner Title r:%forma~anddev~easement 042693a 25' DRAINAGE EASEMENT AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER A PORTION OF LOT 273 OF' TRACT MAP 3883, 'RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 63, PAGES 1 THROUGH 35, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY.~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY 25.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 273. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: JAMES A. DRENON P.L.S. 6153 EXP. 3/31/98 DATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ ~c~.. l"' ¥o ' Fleet,a ,__ ~,/~,~,,~'~ cA,>/5¢:~a' ~ : ",~, '- / , 'T~,~ LOT 275 6xz~ r. z~ ~. zz. 1I fSl. ~G ' ENGINEERING VENTURES al35OI3 RIOG~ PARK DRIVE 45 SUITE 202 · {714l 699-6 O TEMECI. R.A. CA 92590 !~,t..a,,a~lreNG · t. ANO It/e.,t'w,~ ITEM NO. 8 TO: FROM: ,,~ DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~, FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 24, 1994 Final Parcel Map No. 27239 (located on the westerly side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Rancho Way) PREPARED BY:~Raymond Ao Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development lJim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Parcel Map No. 27239 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amendment No. 1, was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Director, Gary Thornhill, on February 5, 1992. The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval. Final Parcel Map No. 27239 is a six (6) parcel commercial subdivision of acres located on the westerly side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Rancho Way. The site currently has an existing packing house located on Parcel No. 2 of the Parcel Map. Surrounding land uses include vacant land and manufacturing uses. The site is zoned manufacturing service commercial (M-SC) as are adjacent parcels. The established zoning on the property conforms with the land use designation on the General Plan for the City of Temecula. The following fees have been paid for Final Parcel Map 27239: Area Drainage Fees (Cond. No. 41) $10,481.31 r.\agdrpt\94%O524%pm272391skg The following fees have been deferred for Final Parcel Map No. 27239: Stephen's K-Rat Mitigation Fees Fire Mitigation Fees Public Facilities Fee Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees Due prior to grading permit (Ord. No. 663) Due prior to building permit (Cond. No. 7) Due prior to building permit (Cond. No. 45) Due prior to building permit (Cond. No. 25) No bonds are required because there are no public improvements associated with this parcel map. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. Development Fee Checklist Project Location Map Copy of Sht. 2, Parcel Map No. 27239 Conditions of Approval Fees & Securities Report r:-\agdrpt%94%O524%pm27239/ekg CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO.: Parcel Mal;) No. 27239 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Flood Control (ADP) Public Facility Traffic Signal Mitigation Fire Mitigation Quimby CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Due prior to grading permit (Ordinance No. 663) Paid (Condition No. 41) Due prior to building permit (Condition No. 45) Due prior to building permit (Condition No. 25) Due prior to building permit (Condition No. 7) N/A r.%egdrpt%94\0524%pm272391ekg ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amd. No. 1 Project Description: A 6 parcel planned industrial subdivision of a 13.94 acre site. Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-201-003-6 Planning Department The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is February 3, 1994. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The applicant shall comply with the Environmental Health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated September 11, 1991 a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department of Transportation transmittal dated September 9, 1991 a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated September 11, 1991 a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlines in the Riverside County Fire Department transmittal dated September 11, 1991. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Industrial Park zone. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. SLSTAFF!Ixr~7239.-1 .F'IVl 13 10. 11. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan". "Drainage easements shall be left free of buildings and obstructions." 12. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. Be All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. 13. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239 Amended No. 1, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. 14. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground, with easements provided as required. 15. S%STAFFRFl'~7239-1 .N No lot or unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the 14 development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 16. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. 17. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars (1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars (81250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Twenty Five Dollar (825.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). 18. Parcel Map No. 27239 Amd. No. I will need to comply with any and all conditions of underlying Plot Plan No. 11621. Building and Safety Department Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall provide information to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official that building setbacks and exterior wall construction comply with the provisions of table 5A, 1988 Uniform Building Code for proximity to property line. Public Works Department The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Subdivider has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvements constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. S%STAFFRFT~27239-1 .PM 15 PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 19. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Planning Department; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; CaITrans Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Rood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; and 20. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 21. 22. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Ynez Road and so noted on the final map with the exception of three entry points as shown on the Tentative Map and as approved by the Department of Public Works. 23. 24. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer and City Attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be subject to the following Engineering conditions: The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. C. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association S~STAFF~7239-1.pM 16 are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to fie City. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and related facilities. · 25. 26. 27. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. (1) The declaration shall contain language prohibiting further subdivision of any lots, whether they are lettered lots or numbered lots. (2) All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits. (3) Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map, or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. Prior to recordation of the final map, the d~veloper shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. The subdivider shall submit two (2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. S~TAFm'T~7,3~ ."M 17 28. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted as directed by the Department of Public Works at the time of application for grading plan check. 29. 30. The subdivider shall submit two (2) copies of a soils report to the Department of Public Works. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. Updated drainage calculations shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works. All drainage facilities shall be upgraded and installed as required by the Department of Public Works. 31. 32. On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way, shall be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map and "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." An easement for the mail boxes adjacent to the pubiic street right-of-way shall be recorded and shown on the final map. 33. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public. Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. 34. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CA'IV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street im provemerits. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination SYstem (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until a NPDES permit is granted or the project is shown to be exempt. 36. 37. 38. 39. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets or drives, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters have been obtained, and approval of the grading plan has been granted by the Department of Public works. S~STAFFRFT~7239-1 .PM 18 40. 41. 42. PRIOR 43. 44. 45. PRIOR 46. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April inclusive, erosion control and runoff mitigation plans will be required. All plans shall be submitted with appropriate notes as directed and approved by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Rood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. An encroachment permit shall be required 'from CalTrans for any work within their right-of-way. TO BUILDING PERMIT: A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial .conformance with the approved rough grading plan. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post security to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount · of the security shall be $2,00 pe~ square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer 'understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: Construct all improvements including but not limited to, curb and/or gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, and drainage devices as shown on the approved plans. S~STAr+~'T~72a~ .~4 19 TransDortation Enaineerina PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 47. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Ynez Road. 48. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the design requirements. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS: 49. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of .Public Works. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 50. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan. 51. Provide limited landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance. S~STAFFRPT~7239-1 20 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4065 COUNTY CIRCLE 0R. RIVERSIDE, CA. 92503 (Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 925l;5-7600) FAX (1 14) 3Ss-4S~S September 11, 1991 CITY 0FTEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43180 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, SUITE 200 TEMECULA, CA 92390 ATTN: Richard Ayala: RE: PARCEL MAP N0. 27239: BEING A DIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 AND A PORTION OF.PARCEL 3 OF MAP N0. 19677, IN THE CITY 0F TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. (6 lots) Dear Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Parcel Map No. 27239 and recommends: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and ~oint specifications, and the size of the main at the dunction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code,-California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and'..General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities. Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Parcel Map No. 27239, is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Parcel Map". DR. SP'~t/(S , ,.c. ,o~,. o.v-,.. ,,,.,. e.,. coYHe. CINL sNELL. B.S.N., MIi..A. J.M. FANNING, R.~.H.S., 0EPt,, ,eRECTOR OF HEALTH DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HEALTH ~."G'at't'~.ll:5'. ,,,.n~..'l'J,. DEPUTY OtlIECTOR OF HEALTH DEPUTY DIRECTOR OIr HEALTH PERSONAL HEALTH SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACTf~* ,w. Or'Re'Nt'l'R SPECIAL SERVeGEE AOMIN. · SUPPORT SERVICES - HEALTH GINTEAl 8ANNtNG 3055 RAMSEV STREET · 8erieled, CA 92220 I ELYTHE 3~63 NORTH 8ROADWAY - Bitetile, CA !;iS5 · CASA ELANCA r240 MARGUERITA - RIseregis, CA SEE04 CORONA "t05 SOUTH BUENA VISTA ' CoLons. CA et 120 · HEMIT IS0 NORTH STATE STREET - Hemel, CA BE343 · INOlO 41-209 OASIS STREET - IMIO, CA S2201 LAKE ELSINORE 30195 FRASER OR, - Lees Elsieore. CA 1~330 · PALM SPRINGS 311 t TAHO UITZ*MeCALLUM o Palm S0renes. CA SEES; · PEARLS ~3~* NORTH '13' ST. - PEARLS. CA e23F0 · RIVERSIDE 1520 LINDEN ST. ° Riverside. CA 92507 · RUBIOOUX &Ill MISSION ELVO. - Rivessees. CA 92509 City of Temecula Page Two Attn: Richard Ayala September 11, 1991 This cerl. ification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Parcel Map at any specific quantities. flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose". This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to The City of Temecula's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the reddest for the recordation of the final map. This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District. the City of Temecula and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate. along with the original drawing, to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter. location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the 5unction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Parcel Map NO. 27239 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed pare. el map." City of Temecula Page Three Attn: Richard Ayala September 11, 1991 The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review mt lemst two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized prior to recordation of the final map. Sincerely, S'~amM~rar~.H.S. IV Environmental Health Services SM:dr STATE OF CAUFORNIA--.SUSIN[__~_~. TRAI,,ISPC31RTATIL ,~ND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 231 SAN BERNARDINO, CAUFOItNIA 92402 TDD (714) 383-4609 September 9, 1991 Development Review 08-Riv-15-7.12/7.22 Planning Department City Hall Attention Mr. Richard Ayala City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 Dear Mr. Ayala: Your Reference: TPM 27239 Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Tentative Parcel Map 27239 located east of 1-15, north of Highway 79 (Winchester Road) and west of Ynez Road in Temecula. Please refer to the attached material on which our-comments have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those items noted under additional comments. If any work is necessary within the State highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. Please be advised that this is a conceptual review only. Final approval of grading and drainage will be determined during the Encroachment Permit process. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Salah or Mr, Wisniewski of our Development Review Section at (714) 383- 4384. - Very truly yours, Chief, Development Review Branch Attachment YOUR REFERENCE PLAH CHECKER DATE h-'- REQUEST THAT THE ITEMS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: NORMAL RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION TO PROVIDE HALF--WIDTH ON THE STATE HIGINAY, NORMAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO PROVIDE HALF--WIDTH ON THE STATE HIGHk~Y, CURB AND GUTTER/ STATE STANDARD t TYPE ALONG THE STATE HIGHWAY, , PARKING SHALL BE PROHIBITED ALONG THE STATE HIGHWAY BY PAINTING THE C~JRB RED AND/OR BY THE PROPER PLACEMENT OF NO PARKING SIGHS. RADIUS OJRB RETURNS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERSECTIONS WITH THE STATE HIGHWAY, STATE STAJeOARD WHEELCHAIR RAMPS SMALL BE PROVIDED IN THE CURB RETURNS, POSITIVE VEHICULAR BARRIER ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO LIMIT PHYSICAL ACCESS TO THE TATE H I GHTJAY, VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL HOT BE DEVELOPED DIRECTLY TO THE STATE HZGHUAY, dVEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHWAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY EXISTING PUBLIC ROAD CONHECTIONS. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHWAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY STANDARD DR ] VEUATS. ~_ VEHICLq_AR AC~SS SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITHIN OF TFE IMTERSI:CTION AT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHWAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY 'A ROAD--TYPE CONNECTION, VEHICULAR ACCESS CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PAVED AT LEAST WITHIN THE STATE HIGIiI~AY RIGHT OF WAT, ACCESS POINTS TO THE STATE H1GHUAY SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A HAMMER THAT WILL PROVIDE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR HPH ALONG THE STATE HIGHSJAY · '" LaaDSCAPIHG ALONG THE STATE HIGHVAT SMALL PROVIDE FOR SAFE SIGHT DISTANCEt COMPLY WITH FIXED ONJECT SET BACX: AND BE TO STATE STANDARDS. A LEFT--TURI4 LANEt INCLUDING SHOULDERS AND ANY NECESSARY UIDENIRG~ SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE STATE A TP. AFF]C STUDY ~NDICATING ON AND OFF--SITE FLOg PATTERNS AND VOLIJI4ESt PRONLE IMPACTS AND MEASURES SHALL BE PREPARED · PARKING SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A NANHER THAT WILL NOT CAUSE ANY VEHICULAR MOVEMENT CONFLICTSt lli:LUO!~G PAR[ZiG A/C~L ENTRANCE AND EXIT~ WITHIH OF THE EkrTRJUIC~ FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY, E SMALL BE TAEN WHEN DEVELOPING THIS PRC~RTT TO PRESERVE AND I~RPETUATE THE EXISTING DeAIIL~ PAilr. gll /[ F THE STATE HIGHWAY, PARTICULAR CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO C/.IIJLATIVE INCREASED $TClLN RtlK}FF TO 111~ AT A HIGh'dAY DRAINAGE PROBLEM IS NOT CREATED, LEASE REFER TO ATTACHED ADDITIONAL COHNENTS, PROVIDE TO APPLICANT, JCONSTRUCTIO I/DEHOLITION WITHIN PRESENT OR PROPOSED STATE RIGHT OF gAY SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED FOR POTEN' HAZARDCXJ$ WASTE ( I oE-ASBESTOSp PETROCHEMICALS I ETC° ) AND MITIGATED AS PER REQUIREMENTS OF REGULATORY AGENC. r, qHEN PLANS ARE $UBHITTED f PLEASE CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ATTACKED Iml:~ANDOUTef- THIS WILL EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS AND TIME REQUIRED FOR PLAN CHECX. PROVIDE TO APPLIC~. ALTHCx3GH THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEMt CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA./~a4Y MEASURES NECESSARY TO MITIGATE THE CIAWJLATIVE IMPACT OF TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIO~ TO O~ W{TH DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA THAT .NECE~XTATES THEM- /~CONSIDERAT[ON SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE PROVISXON~ OR FUTURE PROVISIONt OF SIGNILIZA~ION AND LIGHTING OF THE IT APPEARS THAT THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL C~IJLD NAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE STATE HIGW&4AY SYSTEM OF THE AREA. ARY' MEASURES TO MITIGATE THE TRAFFIC AND/OR DRAINABE IMPACTS SHALL SE INCLUDED UlTH THE DEVELOPMENT. THIS PORTION OF'THE STATE HIBHUAT IS INCLUDED IN THE CALIFORNIA Z/ASTER PLAN OF STATE HIGHWAYS ELIGIELE FOR OFFICIAL SCENIC HIGm4AY DESIGNATION A~O IN THE FUTURE YOUR AGENCY MAY WISH TO HAVE THIS ROUTE OFFICIALLY' DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGNUAY. THIS PORTION OF THE STATE HIGH'JAY HAS SEEN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED" AS A STATE SCENIC HIGHI,/AYt ANO DEVELOPMErIT IN THIS CORRIDOR SHCULD BE COMPATIBLE &,rITH THE SCENIC HIGH~,/AY CONCEPT. :IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT THERE I$ CZ~SIDEEABLE PUBLIC CONCERN ABOUT NOISE LEVELS ADJACENT TO HEAVILY TRAVEL._LE]) w HIGHSrAYS. I. AND DEVELOPMENTt IN ORDER TO BE COMPATIBLE U[TH THIS CONCERNt MAY REQUIRE SPECIAL NOISE ATTEIA' ~ MEASURES. DEVI"LOPHENT OF THIS PROPERTY SHOULD INCLUDE ANY NECESSARY NOISE ATTENUATION,. PLEASE SEND "T~ .:'i~i~:"'e]~CK~.b'~'B~."~W"~;T~ d. CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 DEVELOPMENT REVXEU BRANCH P.O, Box 231 SAJ4 BERNARDINO, CA 92402 A COPY OF ANT CONDITIONS OF AP~OVAL OR REVISED APPROVAL. ~//A copy OF ANY DOC~ENTS PROVIDING ADDITIONAL STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF ~/AY UPON RECORDATIOR OF THE NAP. /AJ~Y PROPOSALS TO FURTHER DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY. COPY OF THE TRAFFIC OR ENVIMMTAL STUDY. CHECK PRINT OF THE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP. CNECE PRINT OF THE PLANS FOR ANY IMPROVEMENTS UITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE STATE NIGHWAY RIGHT Of 'MAT. CHECIC PRINT OF THE GRADING ~ DRAINAGE PLANS FOR THIS PROPERTY %HEN AVAILABLE. 7'A RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 18P5 THIRD STRE~ · RIVERSIDE, CA 9;~507-3484 · BUS. (714) 684-0850 FAX (714) 684-1007 September 11, 1991 Mr. Richard Ayala Temecula Planning Department City of Temecu!a 43180 Business Park Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 Re: PM 27239 Dear Richard: We currently provide service to the site mentioned above via RTA Route 23 and we are requesting that a bus turnout or a pad for a bus stop be incorporated into the general design as the size of the planned project will negatively impact our level of service unless this amenity. is constructed. An ideal "location for the bus turnout/bus stop would be on westside of Ynez Road farside the middle entrance, east of proposed Building H. I can provide an exact location for the turnout/bus pad as the project progresses. Thank you for the opportunity t6 review and comment on this project. Your efforts' to keep us updated on the status of this request will be very much appreciated. Please let usknow when this project will be completed. Should you require additional information or specifications, please don't hesitate to contact me. Transit Planner BB:as PDEV#92 Rnrr. RsmE COUNTY FIRE DEP ' 210 W~T SAN JACINTO AVEN~E · PE~$, ~R~ ~) ~7-1~ OLF~ L NEWMAN S~PT~IBER 11, 1991 ~D; CITY OF TZIIZCULA ATTN: PIANSIE0 DEPT RE: FAKCEL NAP Z7239 respect to the conditions oi approval for .the above referenced land ~tviston, the Firs Depart~nent recommends the ~ol~ov~n8 fire p~otection measures be provided in accord~ee ~th Xivets~de County Otd~neee and/or reco~me~ ~re protection standards~ All Fire Protection rce. uirsmant's ve:e addressed on Ploc Plan 11621 & 107~5. Ltl questions regardSr~ the meaning of conditions shall be re/erred Co the P~annina and RAYH01tD 1t. ItECl~ Chief Fir--Department Planner Laur,. Cabrxl, Fire Safety ~pecialist Lc/~m {2 LNDIO OfflCZ /f,?33C. mmn~Clu~Dd~SukF, isdle, CAf3201 (619) 34 fi3.~ e ~AX (619) 77S,2072 PI4.NNINO ~IVISION 2754/?7 · ?AX 01o 3~9,74St ~TSM~t~AOFRa 4t00Z Coun~ C~me D~ Suit ~5, Tenenk CA 9139~ {~|4) 6N-SOre · FAX el4) 694~16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA gas COMPANY 1981 LUGONIA AVENUE. REDLANDS, CAMFORNIA MAILING ADORESS: P.O. BOX ~_'3Ca~__. REDLANDS. CALIFORNIA 92373-0306 Date, ?'//°~1 Toz C/r>,' OM P~,q,4j.,u//c., {- 4.:=;/R o Ru..~./,t.J~.. c,; ,oAe/,, z~/v;' ,, .su/7~' 7"t,,,-/,~C'~,'/,q/ ~,"x3 . ATTF. NTION .. /eI:HnRD RE: P,~k~c'Y'( /4.4P ~ ( ) Per your request ( ) Copt/Copies of our Maps ( ) Copy of your Dwg./Plan with respect to the location of our facilities indicates that: ( ) Please forward prints of your Plan & Profile showing the location of our facilities ) Please forward two sets of your approved plans No conflict is expected A conflict is expected (see description below or attachment) ( ) Our relocation plan is attached for your: ( ) Review ( ) Approval ( ) Comments ( ) Depth checks and/or elevations were taken at: ( ) the location(s) requested ( ) the location(s) mutually agreed upon ( ) the location(s) we deemed necessary ) Depth or elevation information is tabulated or shown graphically on the enclosed or attached. Comments: If you desire further information on any cost of installation, please contact our Builder Services Department (714) 335-7775. gas at Dan Orr Planning Technician (714) 335-7828 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 27239 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL Maintenance Retention Monument Security DATE: May 24, 1994 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 Note: No bonds are required because there are no public improvements associated with this parcel map. DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee Fire Mitigation Fee Signal Mitigation Fee Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees $ 0.00 · ~10,481.31 $ T.B.D.* $ T.B.D.* $ N/A $ T.B.D.* SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid To Date Balance of Fees Due 54.00 4.00 750.00 N/A 250.00 1,058.00 0.00 * T.B.D. - To Be Determined r.\agdrpt%94%O524%pm2723915kg ITEM NO. 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER.~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 24, 1994 Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Modification of the Traffic Signal and Striping at the Intersection of Rancho California Road and Front Street (Project No. PW94-09) PREPARED BY: Z~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for providing and installing detector loops and re-striping on the northerly approach of Front Street at Rancho California Road. BACKGROUND: The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The project includes the installation of new loop detectors and striping to provide a dual left turn lane from south bound Front Street to east bound Rancho California Road. With the installation of the dual left turn lane the amount of signal time now used for this left turn movement will be reduced and will result in a more efficient operation of the traffic signal. The Engineers Estimate for the project is $12,926.00 FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds exist in the Traffic Signal Maintenance Account No. 001-164-999-5405 to fund the improvements. r:\agdrpt%94~0524~pw94-09.siglajp ITEM NO. 10 FINANCE OFFICER ,I~ CITY MANAGER /~~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 24, 1994 Acceptance of Maintenance Easements on Ynez Road adjacent to Tower Plaza and Town Center for Traffic Signal Maintenance Within CFD 88-12 PREPARED BY:~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer- Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council; Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement and Grant of Easement with the property owners along Ynez Road accepting easements for Traffic Signal Maintenance. 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE ON YNEZ ROAD ADJACENT TO TOWER PLAZA AND TOWN CENTER BACKGROUND: Easements for Traffic Signal Maintenance on Ynez Road at the north and south drive way entrances to the Tower Plaza and Town Center shopping centers are needed at this time to provide for the maintenance of the traffic signal improvements installed during the construction of the Ynez Road street improvements (Project No. PW 92- 05). r:-~agdrpt~94~O524~,ynezsign.acclajp The maintenance easements will provide for maintenance of new signal equipment, including signal poles, pull boxes, and detection loops at the north and south entrances to both shopping centers. All property owners have offered to grant portions of their property to the City for the maintenance of the traffic signal equipment. Acceptance of the easements gives the City the legal right to access the property to maintain the traffic signal facilities located wit!iin the driveway area. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact has been identified in accepting these grants of easement for signal maintenance. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 94- with Exhibits "A-B". n%agd~pt%94%O524~ynezeign.lcclajp RESOLUTION NO. 94= A RF~OLLFrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEFrING THE GRANT OF EASF2VrENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE ON YNEz ROAD ADJACENT TO TOWER PLAZA AND TOWN CENTER The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, the Property Owners shown in Exhibit "A" have granted easements to the City of Temecula for the maintenance of traffic signal equipment on Ynez Road within the north and south driveway entrances to the Tower Plaza and Town Center shopping centers; WHEREAS, the legal descriptions for the portions of Ynez Road are set forth and depicted in Exhibit "B", attached hereto; WHEREAS, the City desires to accept the grants of easement to maintain that portion of the traffic signal facilities located within each driveway; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept the grants of easement for traffic signal maintenance on Ynez Road as described and depicted in Exhibit "B" , attached hereto. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of May, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA SS r:%agdrptX94%O524\ynezsign.acctajp I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 241h day of May, 1994, by the following vote: COUNCILM~-MBERS: NOES: COUNCH,MEMBERS: COUNCILM~MBERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNCILMF-MBERS: r:\agdrpt\94XO524\ynezsign.acclajp EXHIBIT nan TO RESOLUTION NO 94- Property Owners granting easements along Ynez Road 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Wells Fargo Bank Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association North County Bancorp KRDC, Inc., a California Corporation Home Savings of America Del Taco Restaurant Radnor/Land Grant r:~agdrpt%94%OS24~ynezsign.acc/ajp EXHIBIT "B' TO RESOLUTION NO 94- Certificate of Acceptance of Easement, Legal Plats and Descriptions (To be attached to final resolution) r:~,agdrpt\94~,O524\ynezsign.acclajp State of On this the 19~'.?,before me. the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared ~;;~9.~onally known to me [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) y,.)~Z// subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that executed it. NO Signature MUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages .-~ Date of Document TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above 7100-109 I) NAl~NOTNqYASSOC~-8236~Ave.-RO. Box7184-CanogaPaek CA 91304-7184 CERTIRCATE OF ACCEPTANCE O~= EASEMENT (Government Code Section 27281 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that interest in real propert,/granted by easement dated from Radnor/Landararrt Rancho California Town Center Pertnershio. a California General Partnershio to the CITY OF TEMECUI. A, is hereby accepted for me purpose of vesting title in the City of Temecula on behalf. of the public for Traffic Signal Facilities and Maintenance Purposes by the undersigned on behalf of the City Council pursuant to the authority contained in County Ordinance No. 669. Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Tem. ecula F0F ;ORDER'S USE THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR RETURN TO: THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY CITY OF TEMECULA OF TEMECULA AND ENTilq m 43174 BUSINESS PARK DFL. TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEF_ TEMECULA, CA 925S (Gov. Code 6103) By: Tim D. Serlet RCE 28738 Exp. 9130/94 City Engineer City of Temecuia EASEMENT RADNOR/LANDGRANT RANCHO CALIFORNIA TOWN CENTER PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, said facilities shall include but not be limited to Traffic signals, poles. traffic controllers. pull boxes, underground conduit, and detector loops for traffic control p~Jrposes, over, upon, across and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: SEE EXHIBITS 'A' AND "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PaDNOR~ANDGRANT .RANCHO CALIFORNIA TOWN CENTER. PARTNERSHIP, a California general partnership BY: RADNOR/LANDGRANT-RANCHO PARTNERSHIP, a California general partnership, General Partner BY: LGD-RANCHO CALIFOPd~IA, a CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP, General Partner BY: LANDGRANT DEVELOPMENT, INC., a California corporation, General Partner DATED: DATED: APN. 921-320-048 Sharon R. Hibbert, Vice President of Real Estate C~° ~ ~ of Chris Smith, Vi~e~;esident Real Estate EXHIBIT I F~AL DFSCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCEL "A" That portion of Parcel 13 of Parcel Map No. 22863 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 150, pages 51 through 57 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of Parcel 12, of said Parcel Map No. 22863, said corner also being a point on the easterly right of way line of Ynez Road; THENCE North 9° 00'39" West, 109.64 feet along said easterly right of way line; THENCE leaving said easterly right of way line South 65° 19'15" East, 43.27 feet; THENCE South 9° 00'39" East, 62.00 feet; THENCE South 47° 41 '51' West, 43.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcel 12 of said Parcel Map No. 22863. Said parcel "A" contains 2739+ sq. ft., 0.063 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and any easements of record. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. ~r No. LS624 ~. Exp./~' pw015~r:~cfd8812~legals.don EXHIBIT "B" SCALE: I"= 50' CERT. PAR. k ""'=It 593 INST. tk 20884 REC. 6-23-89 KRIS R. WINCHAK LAND SURVEYING - PLANNING (909) 698-8536 JER i//////! PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 2,7:39+-- SO. FT., O.06:3+_ACRES- CITY OF TEMECULA SCALE: I"'-50' EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS DRAWN BY: K.R.W. AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES CHECKED BY: K.R.W. C.F.D. 88-12 ( YNEZ ROAD ) /~ OF CAt,t~ ~ '~:,~': DNEY A. HILL the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared ,~~/87/-,F~,k~- Y///.,a. ~.~ ,~: ~;iL~known to me [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. MUST BE ATI'ACHED Number of Pages --~' Date of Document "~ TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above 7100-109 ¢) N/iTiONN. NC)lN=ffASSOCI/01:~o8238Remmetke.,P.O. Box71NoCmlogePIl~,CA 91304-7184 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT (Governmere Code Section 27281 THIS IS TO CEFFTIFY that interest in real property granted by easement dated from Radnor/Landarant Rancho California Town Cemer Parrnershio. a California General Parmershio to the CITY OF TEMECULA, is hereby accepted for the purpose of verdng title in the Crty of 'Temecuta on behalf' of the public for Traffic Signal FacJlities and Maintenance Purposes by the undersigned on behalf of the City Council pursuam to the authority contained in County Ordinance No. 669. Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Temecula PROJECT NAMe - CED B8,-12 ~ ;ORDER'S USE THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR RETURN TO.* THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY CITY OF TEMECULA OF TEMECULA AND ENTITLED 43174 BUSINESS PARK TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEF_ TEMECULA, CA 925, |Gov, Code 6103} By: Tim D. Serlet RCE 28738 Exp. 9130/94 City Engineer City of Temecula EASEMENT RADNOR/LANDGRANT RANCHO CALIFORNIA TOWN CNETER PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP grant(s} to the City of Temecula an easement for TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, said facilities shall include but not be limited to traffic signals, poles, traffic controllers, pull boxes, underground conduit, and detector loops for traffic control purposes, over, upon, across and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: SEE EXHIBITS "A' AND 'B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. RADNOR/LANDGRANT RANCHO CALIFORNIA TOWN CENTER PARTNERSHIP, a California general partnership B": RADNOR/LANDGRANT-RANCNO'PARTNERSHIP, a California general partnership, General Partner BY: LGD-RANCHO CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, General-Partner BY: LANDGRANT DEVELOPMENT, INC., a California corporation, General Partner DATED: DATED: APN. 921-320~41 Sharon R~ Hibbert, Vice President Real Estate EXHIBIT 'A" ! FGAL DESCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCFL "A" That portion of Parcel 10 of Parcel Map No. 22863 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 150, pages 51 through 57 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of Parcel 9 of said Parcel Map No. 22863; said corner also being a point on the easterly right of way line of Ynez Road, said easterly right of way line being a curve concave easterly and having a radius of 1950.00 feet and to which point a radial line bears North 66° 40'06" East; THENCE northerly 121.19 feet along said curve through a central angle of 3° 33'39"; THENCE leaving said easterly right of way line South 71 o 09'15" East, 46.03 feet; THENCE South 21 o 33'31" East, 62.00 feet; THENCE South 28~ 31 '39" West, 45.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within that parcel of land as described in Grant Deed to Wells Fargo Bank in Instrument No. 438801 recorded December 3, 1990 in the office of the Riverside County Recorder, State of California. Said Parcel "A" contains 1590_-F_ sq. ft., 0.037 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and easements of record. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. pw0 15\r:\cfd 8 8 12\le gals .don EXHIBIT "B" POR. LOT 17 & 18 TRACT 5554 M.B. 54/25-50 6' EA," NT 50726 REC. 2-9-93 GRANT DEED TO WELLS FARGO BANK INST. REC. 12-:5-90 SCALE: I"= 80' RADNOR LANDGRANT AP.N. 921-:520 - 041 ,, ,H PAR. I0 ~1 \°~~ \5 P.M. No. 22965 ~ro.0 P.M. 150/51-57 KRIS R. WINCHAK SCALS: I"= 80' CITY OF TEMECULA EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS LAND SURVEYING-PLANNING DRAWN 8Y: K.R.W. AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES (909) 698-s5:~6 CHECKED SY: K.R.W. C.F.D. 88-12 ( YNEZ ROAD ) County of SS. the undersigned Notary Public, pemonaljy ap!~red ~ ~Mv to be the person(s) whose name(s) · subscribed to the ~ '~ "' ~ '~ '* - ~ ~ -. · within instrument, and acknowledged that ~ executed it. MUST BE ATrACHED Number of Pages ,,~ Date of Document TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above 7100-109 ~ N/;10NALNOl~ASSOCI/g'ION,8236Renmet/el..*P.O. Box7184oCenoglpN~,CA 91304-71~4 TW" 85 P,G. 3',~ 5r_:C. 1 ROAD NAMe - ~'nez i-toao C-ERRFICATE OF ACCEFTANCE OF'EASEMENT {Government Code Section 27281 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that interest in real property granted by easement dated from Radnor/Landorant Rancho California Town Center PartnershiP a California Genera{ Parmershio to the CITY OF TEMECULA, is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Temecula on behalf of the public for concrete sidewalk, concrete block retaining wall, and maintenance purpose~ by the :undersigned on behaff of the City Council t)ursuant to the authority contained in County Ordinance No. 669. Grantee consents to recordat{on thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Temecula FOE jORDER'S USE THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR RETURN TO: THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY CITY OF TEMECULA OF TEMECULA AND ENTITLED 43174 BUSINESS PARK DP TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. TEMECULA, CA 925~, (Gov. Code 6103) By: Tim D. Sealer RCE 28738 Exp. 9/30/94 City Engineer City of Temecula EASEMENT RANDOR/LANDGRANT RANCHO CALIFORNIA TOWN CENTER PARTNERSHIP A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALL, AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, said facilities snail include but not be limited to traffic signals, poles, traffic controllers, pull boxes, underground conduit, and detector loops for traffic control purposes, over, upon, across and within the real propercy in the City of Riverside, State of California, Cescribed as follows: SEE EXHIBITS "A' AND 'B* ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. ~ ADNOR/LANDGRANT RANCHO CALfFORNIA TOWN CENTER PARTNERSHIP, a California general partnership BY: RADNOR/LANDGRANT-RANCHO PARTNERSHIP, a California general partnership, General Partner BY: LGD-RANCHO CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, General Partner BY: LANDGRANT DEVELOPMENT, INC., a California corporation, General Partner DATED: APN. 921-320-050 r Sharon R. Hibbert, Vice President of Real Estate Chris Smith, Vice President of Real Estate EXHIBIT "A" I F~AI nFSCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR SIDEWALKS, RETAINING WALLS, AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCEL "A' That portion of Parcel 15 of Parcel Map No. 22863 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 150, pages 51 through 57 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwest corner of said Parcel 15, said corner also being a point on the easterly right of way line of Ynez Road; THENCE North 9° 00'39" West, 151.40 feet along said easterly right of way line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 9° 00'39" West 110.50 feet; THENCE leaving said easterly right of way line South 29° 34'01' East, 34.18 feet; THENCE South 9° 00'39" East 46.50 feet; THENCE South 11°32'43" West, 34.18 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Said Parcel "A" contains 942+ $q. ft., 0.022 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and all easements of record. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. pw0 15\r:~cfd8 8 12~legals.don F ~, > ~, / N 29°34'01" w \ EXHIBIT "B" ~ \ CERT. PAR. MERGER4~593 // ~ '~\ :\N ST\ . e 20884~~0 REC. ~ , / ~~ ~ ~~ '/ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ · REC. 6-19-e9 .18' - N 9o00' 39" ~ No. LS6240 ~ ' · ~ - ~ S.W. COR. PA . 15 LEGE y/////~ PAR CEL "A' ~~. CONTA I N S 94~2 SQFT 00~AC E KRIS R. WINCHAK SCaLe: 1"-'80' CITY OF TEMECULA- EASEMENT FOR SIDEWALK, WALLS LAND SURVEYING-PLANNING DRAWN BY: K.R.W. AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES (909) 698-85]6 CHECKED BY: K.R.W. C.F.D. 88-12 (YNEZ ROAD ) ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of On/~)ZS'/~.-~ before me, Date Name an~f~itte of Officer (i.e., Your I~e, ~otary Pu~ilic) personally appeared ~ ~ Y'/'r) ~ · r/~ i~ r-/'~ r 7L Name(s) of Document Signer(~)/) ' ~//~na ly known to to me on e I me~(or proved the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand'and official seal. ~Signature of Notary (Affix seal in the above blank space) Copyright © 1993 by D T Consulting · P.O. Box 1573, Gindale, CA 91209-1573 Form de 1002 TWN. b~ HG. 3W 5EC. 1 ROAD NAME - Yr~cz Road CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT (Government Code Section 27281 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that interest in real property granted by easement dated from Del Taco Restaurant Prooerties III. A California Limited Partnership to the CITY OF TEMECULA, is heraby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Temecula on behelf of the public for Traffic Signal Facilities and Maintenance Purposes by the undersigned on beheff of the City Council pursuant to the authority contained in County Ordinance No. 669. Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Temecula PROJECT NAME- Cru t~B-12 w.o.# FOR RECORDER'S USE THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR RETURN TO: THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY CITY OF TEMECULA OF TEMECULA AND ENTTI3Fn 43174 BUSINESS PARK DP TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. TEMECULA, CA 925~ (Gov. Code 6103) By: Tim D. Sedet RCE 28738 Exp. 9130/94 City Engineer City of Temecula EASEMENT DEL TACO RESTAURANT PROPERTIES III. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP grant{s} to the City of Temecula an easement for TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, said facilities shall include but not be limited to traffic signals, poles, traffic controllers, pull boxes, underground conduit, and detector loops for traffic control purposes over, upon, across and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: SEE EXHIBITS "A" AND "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. DATED: DEL TACO RESTAURANT PROPERTY ill PARTNERSHIP Viee President Secretary APN. 921-260-024 EXHIBIT "A" I F~AL DFSCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCEL "A" That portion of Parcel 6 of Parcel Map No. 17454 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 114, pages 4 through 9 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of centerline intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road as shown on said Parcel Map No. 17454, said centerline of Ynez Road being a curve concave easterly and having a radius of 2000.00 feet and to which said intersection point a radial line bears North 50° 28'55" East; THENCE northwesterly 1064.52 feet along said curve through a centeral angle of 30° 29'46" to a point of tangency with the centerline of Ynez Road; THENCE leaving said centerline on a line radial to said curve South 80° 58'41" West, 50.00 feet to the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road; THENCE along said westerly right of way line North 9° 01 '19" West, 12.58 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE leaving said westerly right of way line North 56° 42'57" West, 51.38 feet to the northerly line of said parcel 6; THENCE North 9° 01 '19" West, 61.29 feet to the southerly line of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 20363 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 129, pages 98 through 99 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county; THENCE North 39° 03'20" East, 51.07 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road; THENCE along said westerly right of way line South 9°01 '19" East, 130.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcel 11 of said Parcel Map No. 17454. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that pdrtion thereof lying within Parcel 2 of said Parcel Map No. 20363. SAID Parcel :"A" contains 657+ sq. ft., 0.015 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and easements of record. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. pw015\r:~cfd8812~legals.don EXHIBIT Ii B ii SCALE: I" = 60' NORTH COUNTY BANK PARCEL 2 P.M. No. 20363 P.M. 129/98-99 01 o~ z 0 rr I BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT PARCEL II P.M. No. 17454 P.M. 114/4.-9 ~~ F rC A~ V/ll/,! LEGEND PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 6574. KRIS R. WINCHAK LAND SURVEYING - PLANNING (909) 698-8536 N :~01.~0270' E I N 9°01' 19"W__..,, --0 N 61.29' 36' ~-'0 W O~ Z z PARCEL 6 P.M. No. 174.54. P.M. I I 4./4.-9 SO. FT., 0.0152 ACRE S; SCALE: I": DRAWN BY: K.R.W. CHECKED BY: K.R.W. 6' EASEMENT""" ..e.- 'f, DOd REC. 2-9-93 RHO CALIF. CITY OF TEMECULA EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES C.F..D. 88-12 ( YNEZ ROAD ) COUNTY OF LOS Angel es On March 22, 1994 before roe, Susan Zernan , Notary Public, personally appeared CRATG A. H~%}DI~(::~S(~ AND AGiqF_.S JO D]~ ]tOSAR]:O pemonally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persort(s) whose name(s) is/am subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged ............. to me that he/she/they executed the sam in his/Mr/their authorized capacity(m), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand d official seal. Signa~~~~L SF-9474-8 (Rev. A- 11/90 (CA) (Seal) TWN. 8S RG. 3W SEC. I ROAD NAME - Yrmz Road CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF F~SEMFNT (Government Code Section 27281 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that interest in real property Bented by easement from Home Savinos of America. A Federal Savirlne eqnk to the CITY OF TEMECULA, is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Temecull on behalf of the public for Traffic Signal Facilities and Mainte~nGe. Purposes by the undersigned on behalf of the City Council pursuant to the authority contained in County Ordinance No. 669. Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Temecula PROJECT NAME - CFD 88-12 W.O.# FOR RFCOIqr~ER'S USF THIS INSTRUMBIT IS FOR RETURN TO: THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY CITY OF T"M~:4."IJI OF TEMECULA AND BITITI m 43174 BUSINESS PARK TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE TEMECULA, CA (Gov. Code 6103) By: RCE 28738 Exp. 9/30/94 City Engineer City of Temecula EASEMENT HOME SAVINGS OF AMERICA. A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, Mid facilities shell include but not be limited to traffic signals, poles, traffic controllers, pull boxes, underground conduit, and detector loops for traffic control purposes over, upon, across and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside State of California, described as follows: SEE EXHIBITS "A" AND "B' ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. DATED: ~/::2 DATED: APN, 921-270-005 HOME SAVINGS OF AMERICA, President As s Pre s 1dent EXHIBIT LEGAL DFSCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCEL "A' That portion of Parcel 5 of Parcel Map No. 7847 in the City of Temecula, County of · Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 32, pages 47 through 52 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of centerline intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road as shown on said Parcel Map No. 7847, said centerline of Ynez Road being a curve concave easterly and having a radius of 2000.00 feet and to which said intersection point a radial line bears North 50° 28'55" East; THENCE northwesterly 549.93 feet along said curve through a center angle of 15° 45'16"; THENCE leaving said centerline Ynez Road on a line radial to said curve South 66° 14'11" West, 50.00 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 66° 14'11' West, 6.00 feet; THENCE North 23° 25'23" West, 247.~. feet; THENCE North 77° 03'09" West, 60.22 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 5; THENCE North 21 o 16'32" West 61.93 feet to a point on the southerly line of Parcel 8 of Parcel Map No. 17454 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California as per map recorded in Book 114, Pages 4 through 9 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County; THENCE North 47° 19'26" East, 59.56 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road, said right of way line being a non tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of 2050.00 feet and to which point a radial line bears North 70° 11'51" East; THENCE southeasterly, 141.73 feet along said curve through a central angle of 3° 57'40" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcel 8 of said Parcel Map No. 17454. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcel 11 of said' Parcel Map No. 17454. Said Parcel "A" contains 999 sq. ft. 0.023 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and easements of record. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. pw0 15\r:\cfd8 8 12\legals.don ii B II EXHIBIT PARCEL 8 P.M. No. 17454 P.M. 114/4-9 BANK OF AMERICA 6' EASEMENT.q- ---- INST. IS0731 SCALE: I" = 60t -- REC. 2-9-93 50' BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT PARCEL I I N 47 /' ~' E / ' A N 9 o , "W66 ! 10% E f~P~,r I uJ R "'/ I ~-/~"~ N I7 WINCHAK ~ 24.44 / ,,, x .. ' Y,,r~ · P' · ' ' · ' LEGEND }//////,j PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 999+_. ,k__/~= 15° 45' 16" PARCEL 5 R = 2000' R M. No. 7847 L = 549.9:5' P.M. ,~2/47-52 T = 276.71' 6' EASEMENT.-e- '*"' I NST. ~I~ 50727 REC. 2-9-93 SO. FT. , 0.023'P ACRES . N 50~ 28' 55" E CITY OF TEMECULA KRIS R. WINCHAK SCALE: 1"=60' EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS LAND SURVEYING-PLANNING ORAWN BY: K.R.W. AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES (909) 69e-8536 CHECI(EDBY: K.R.W. C.F.D. 88-12 (YNEZ ROAD ) TWN. 85 RG. 3w SEC. 1 ROAD NAME - Ynez Road CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT (Govemment Code Section 27281 IS TO CERTIFY that interest in real property granted by easement dated from KRDC. Inc.. a California Corporation to me CITY OF'TEMECULA, is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Tamecub on behalf of the public for Traffic Signal FaCilities and Maintenance Purposes by the undersigned on behaff of the City Council pursuant to the authority contained in County Ordinance No. 669. Grantee consents to racordatjon thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Temecub PROJECT NAME- CFD 88-12 W.O.# FOR RECORDER'S USE THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR RETURN TO: THE BENBqT OF THE CITY CITY OF TEMECULA OF TEMECULA AND ENT~lm 43174 BUSINESS PARK DR, TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. TEMECULA, CA 92590 igor. Code 6103) By: Tim D. Serlet RCE 28738 Exp. 9/30/94 city Engineer City of Temecub EASEMENT K__RD~. INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Ore...,s) to the City of Temecula an easemere for TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSE, said faCilities shall include but not be limited to traffic signals, poles, traffic controllers, pull boxes, underground conduit, and detector loops for traffic control purposes over, upon, across and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows; SEE EXHIBITS 'A' AND 'B" ATI'ACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. DATED: DAT~ED: 3/7/94 , ., ORPORATION Csaba F. Ko, Vice President /:F'js~'~^T Secretary APN. 921-270-034 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On March 7, 1994, before me Cynthia G. 'Zajd, p~rsonslly appe, ar~ Csaba F. Ko, p~rsonally known to me to b~ the p~rson(s) whos~ name(s) is/ar~ subscribed to the within insmunent and acknowledged to me that he,/she,/th~y executed the same in his/he-r/their authoriz~ capacity, and that by his/her/their signatur~ on the instrument the penon(s) or the entity upon b~half of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrum~t. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ~My commission expires Oct. CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California COUR~ of Rivers ide On March 15, 1994 before me, Renee D. Gentry, Notary Public DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G.. 'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC* personally appeared Lisa D. Peterson , NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence Renee D. Gentry OTARY PUBLIC- CALIFORNIA to be the person(~ whose name(~)is/axec subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that I=~she/tm~ executed the same in N~/her/~K authorized capacityel~P,-~, and that by signature(~ on the instrument the person(~A or the entity upon behalf of which the person{~) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER Assistant Secretary [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Easement TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT 3 NUMBER OF PAGES 3-7-94 DATE OF DOCUMENT f ¢1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION ', 8236 Rernmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · Cartoga Park, CA 91309,.7184 SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) Csaba F, Z<o KRDC, TnC. SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED EXHIBIT 'A" I FGAI DFSCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCEL "A" That portion of Parcel 11 of Parcel Map No. 17454 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 114, pages 4 through 9 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of centerline intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road as shown on said Parcel Map No. 17454, said centerline of Ynez Road being a curve concave easterly and having a radius of 2000.00 feet and to which said intersection point a radial line bears North 50° 28'55" East; THENCE northwesterly 1064.52 feet along said curve through a centeral angle of 30= 29'46" to a point of tangency with the centerline of Ynez Road; THENCE leaving said centerline on a line radial to said curve South 80° 58'41" West, 50.00 feet to the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road; THENCE along said westerly right of way line North 9° 01 '19" West, 12.58 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE leaving said westerly right of way line North 56° 42'57" West, 51.38 feet to the northerly line of Parcel 6 of said Parcel Map 17454; THENCE North 9° 01'19" West, 61.29 feet to the southerly line of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 20363 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 129, pages 98 through 99 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county; THENCE North 39° 03'20" East, 51.07 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road; THENCE along said westerly right of way line South 9° 01 '19" East, 130.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcel 6 of said Parcel Map No. 17454. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcel 2 of said Parcel Map No. 20363. Said Parcel "A" contains 2329+ sq. ft. 0.054 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and easements of record. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. '.~ NO. LS,62,40 ~- _ pw015\r:~cfd8812~legals.don SCALE = 60' EXHIBIT ,o NORTH COUNTY BANK' PARCEL 2 P.M. No. 20363 P.M. 129/98-99 Ii B I1 m 01 <~ 0 n- ! PARCEL II P.M. No. 17454. P.M. 114/4-9 FORD DEVELOPMENT A.P. N. 92 I- 270-034 LEGEND' !/////,j PARCEL "A" C 0 NTA I N S 2,329 +_. KRIS R. WINCHAK LAND SURVEYING - PLANNING (909) 698-8556 SO. FT.,O.O54::);ACRES SCALE: I"= 60' DRAWN BY: K.R.W. C H ECKED BY: K. R .W. 39° ' "E N ;017~70' . N 9° N 61.29 "' / - o~_ z ' 5 ' ~///~/~~.k'~__ __>' ~mn 0": DEL TACO ~ O~ Z PARCEL 6 P.M. NO. 17454 "" P.M. 114/4-9 6' EASEMENT''''m' iNST.:I~ 507~0 REC, 2-9-93 tl II <'--' 0~. RHO. CALiE D N"'~,Oo re' 55" ~ (a~ CITY OF TEMECULA EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES C.ED. 88-12 ( YNEZ ROAD ) ~ 8S RG, 3W SEC. 1 ROAD NAME - ~ nez Road CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT (Government Code Section 27281 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that interest in real property granted by easement dated from KRDC. Inc.. a California Cornoration to the CITY OF TEMECULA, i~ hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Temecula on baheft of the public for Traffic Signal Facilities and Maintenance Purposes by the undersigned on baheft of the City Council. pursuant to the authority contained in County Ordinance No. 669. Grantee consents to recordation thereof by it~ duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Temecula PROJECT NAME- CFD 88-12 FOR RFCORDER'S USE THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR RETURN TO: THE BBIERT OF THE CITY CITY OF TEMECULA OF TEMECULA AND ENTTlqm 43174 BUSINESS PARK TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. TEMECULA, CA 925 IGor. Code 6103) By: Tim D. Serlet RCE 28738 Exp. 9/30/94 City Engineer City of Temecula EASEMENT KRDC. INC.. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, said facilities sha. include but not be limited to traffic signals, poles, traffic controllers, pull boxes, underground conduit, and detector loops for traffic control purposes over, ul~on, across and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows; SEE EXHIBITS 'A" AND 'B' ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. DATED: 3/7/94 DATED: ALIF, F,F,F,F,F,F,F,F,F~, CORPORATION /rss/s/d-TSecretary APN. 921-270-034 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On March 7, 1994, before me Cynthia G. Zajd, personally appeared Csaba F. Ko, personally known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscTibed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature .~',,,l'l',,ll, t' "_.'f'_'. '..,i',; - ,fl,,fi[ , ,- ' '" "~ OFFICIAL SEAL CYNTHIA G. ZAJD ~ , Notary public California ~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY ~ MY commission expires Oct. 14, 1994 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California Coun~ of Riverside Renee D Gentry, Notary Public On March 15, 1994 before me, ' , DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared Lisa D. Peterson [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(6) whose namee~is/;!f4P: subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that JEue/she/ttte~ executed the same in kisther/M=e~ authorized capacity(4~, and that by I=is/her/'eheix signature(~ on the instrument the person~ or the entity upon behalf of which the person(e) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER Tn~(S) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] A'I'rORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Easement TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT 3 NUMBER OF PAGES 3-7-94 DATE OFDOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENT1TY(IES) KRDC, Inc. Csaba F. Ko SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ¢)1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · Cartoga PAW,, CA 91309-7184 EXHIBIT "A" I EGAL DESCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCEL "A" That portion of Parcel 11 of Parcel Map No. 17454 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 114, pages 4 through 9 of Parcel Maps in the office of. the County Recorder of said county described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of centerline intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road as shown on said Parcel Map No. 17454, said centerline of Ynez Road being a curve concave easterly and having a radius of 2000.00 feet and to which said intersection point a radial line bears North 50° 28'55' East; THENCE northwesterly 549.93 feet along said curve through a central angle of 15° 45'16"; THENCE leaving said centerline Ynez Road on a line radial to said curve South 66° 14'11" West, 50.00 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 66° 14'11" West, 6.00 feet; THENCE North 23° 25'23" West, 24.44 feet; THENCE North 77° 03'09" West, 60.22 feet to a point on the northerly line of Parcel 5 of Parcel Map No. 7847 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 32, pages 47 through 52 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county; THENCE North 21 o 16'32" West, 61.93 feet to a point on the southerly line of Parcel 8 of said Parcel Map No. 17454; THENCE North 47° 19'26" East, 59.56 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road, said right of way line being a non tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of 2050.00 feet and to which point a radial line bears North 70° 11 '51" East; THENCE southeasterly, 141.73 feet along said curve through a central angle of 30 57'40" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof .lying within Parcel 5 of said Parcel Map No. 7847. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcel 8 of said Parcel Map No. 17454. Said Parcel "A" contains 2652 Sq. Ft., 0.061 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and easements of record. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part pw015\r:\cfd8812~legals.don EXHIBIT SCALE: I" = 60' BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT A.P.N. 921-270-034 PARCEL II P.M. No. 17454 P.M. 114/4- 9 ;) LAND ~,(./ -~ No. LS6240 ~ ~p. /~-3/- ~ V/// / /] PARCEL 8 P.M. No. 17454 P. M. 114/4-9 BANK OF 6' EASEMENT-'-' INST.teS0731 · REC. 2'9-93 AMERICA N 47* 19'2,6"E 50I r~ 0 N 70° i,' ,~::.E_LR ) HOME SAVINGS OF AMERICA N 77° 60.22' / / N 23° 25' 23"W 24.44' EXtST. BLDG.j" N 66° 14' I I" E 6.00' PARCEL 5 R M. No. 7847 P.M. 32/47- 52 6' EASEMENT..-..P INST. ~1~ 50727 R EC. 2 - 9-95 |1 II /50.00' N 66° 14' I I" l ,,.___A = 15° 45' 16" R = 2000' I = 549.93' t = 276.71' LEGEND PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 2,6524- SO. FT. ,0.0614- ACRES CiTY Of TEMECULA KRIS r. WINCHAK SCALE: 1"=60' EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS LAND SURVEYING - PLANNING DRAWN BY: K.R.W. AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES (,909) 69e-8536 CHECKEDBY: K.R.W. C.F.D. 88-12 (YNEZ ROAD ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA} COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ~ezmonally known Lo me (am !Imaged b~ _....-l~w banira v£ .d4~imf&e%m.~ .,&d .... ) Lo be &he permen(m) whose name(m) j~/ere subscribed t~ the witkin instzwnent end ecknowlodBed to me that Jm~eaee/thoy ~eeuted the same in %aeasse/their authorlead capacity ( los ), and that by ~/thair · iSnature ( · ) on the instnuent the person ( · ), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the inst tf _= ..... --~-- ~--'-_ TWN. 85 i-~. ~W SEC. 1 ROAD ~ME - Ynez Road CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT (Government Code Section 27281 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that interest in real property granted by easement dated from North County Bancorm a Califomia Corooration to the CITY OF TEMECULA, is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Temecula on behalf of the public for Traffic Signal Facilities and Maintenance Purposes by the undersigned on beheff of the City Council pursuant to the authority contained in County Ordinance No. 669. Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Temecula PROJECT NAME - CFD 88-12 FOR RECORDER'S USE THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR RETURN TO: THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY CITY OF TEMECULA OF TEMECULA AND ENTITLED 43174 BUSINESS PARK TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. TEMECULA, CA 925 (Gov. Code 6103) By: Tim D. Sealer RCE 28738 Exp. 9130/94 City Engineer City of Temecula EASEMENT NORTH COUNTY BANCORP, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, said facilities ah,. ,nclude but not be limited to traffic signals, poles, traffic controllers, pull boxes, underground conduit, and detector loops for traffic control purposes, over, upon, across and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: SEE EXHIBITS 'A' AND 'B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. DATED: DATED: /.(~ -/' 2- ~ ~' APN. 921-260-023 ~*"'~' COUNTY BANCORP ON'F es~ 8nt EXHIBIT "A" 1 FGAL DFSCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCFI "A" That'portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 20363 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 129, pages 98 and 99 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of centerline intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road as shown on Parcel Map No. 17454 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 114, pages 4 through 9 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, said centerline of Ynez Road being a curve concave easterly and having a radius of 2000.00 feet and to which said intersection point a radial line bears North 50° 28'55" East; THENCE northwesterly 1064.52 feet along said curve through a centeral angle of 30° 29'46" to a point of tangency with the centerline of Ynez Road; THENCE leaving said centerline on a line radial to said curve South 80° 58'41" West, 50.00 feet to the westerly right of line of Ynez Road; THENCE along said westerly right of way line North 9° 01'19" West, 12.58 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE leaving said westerly right of way line North 56° 42'57" West, 51.38 feet to the northerly line of Parcel 6 of said Parcel Map No. 17454; THENCE North 9° 01'19" West, 61.29 feet to the southerly line of said Parcel 2; THENCE North 39° 03'20" East, 51.07 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road; THENCE along said westerly right of way line South 9° 01 '19" East, 130.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcels 11 and 6 of said Parcel Map No. 17454. Said Parcel "A" contains 648+ sq. ft., 0.015 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and easements of record. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. ~.~ t. AND 8(/ '~ No. LS6240 ~ pw0 15%r:%cfd8 8 12%legals.don EXHIBIT 11 B 11 SCALE: I" = 60' NORTH COUNTY BANK A.P.N. 921- 260-02:~ PARCEL 2 P.M. NO. 20~56,~ P.M. 129/98'99 01 PARCEL II P.M. N0. 17454 P.M. 114/4-9 BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT ' ~ No. LS6240 ~? F ~AI,.'~''~ LEGEND PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 648+- --C) N N 9'01' 19"W___.f , - 61.29' 36 --0 0 I N 56° ' ," · DEL TACO ~ 0': o,~r PARCEL 6 II tl P.M. No, 17454 P.M. I I 4/4-9 SO. FT. ,O.OI~5tACRES. KRIS R. WINCHAK SCALE: I"= 60' LAND SURVEYING-PLANNING DRAWN 8Y: K.R.W. (.909) 698-8536 CHECKED 8Y: K.R.W. 6' EASEMENT""~ .,e- iNST.~ 50730 REC- 2-9-9:5 1 N~0* ~8' 55" F CITY OF TEMECULA EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES C.F..D. 88-12 ( YNEZ ROAD TWN. bS RG. 3W SEC. 1 ROAD NAME - Ynez Road CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT (Government Code Section 27281 ~ ,S TO CERTIFY that interest in real property granted by easement dated from Bank of America Natinrml Trust and ires Assoc. a National Bankira Association to the CITY OF TEMECULA, is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Ternecula on bahelf of the public for Traffic Signal Facilities and Maintenance Purposes by the undersigned on behalf of the City Council pursuant to the authority contained in County Ordinarr. e No. 669. Grantee copsems to racordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Temecula PROJECT NAME - CFD 88-12 w.O.# FOR RECORDER'S USE THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR RETURN TO: THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY CITY OF TEMECULA OF TEMECULA AND ENTITs m 43174 BUSINESS PARK DR. TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. TEMECULA, CA 92590 (Gov. Code 6103) By: Tim D. Serlet RCE 28738 Exp. 9/30/94 City Engineer City of Temecula EASEMENT B.~/ )F AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION. A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, said facilities shall include but not be limited to traffic signals, poles, traffic controller, pull boxes, underground conduit, and detector loops for traffic control purposes, over, upon, across and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: SEE EXHIBITS 'A' AND 'B' ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. DATED: ZT///'~J'/Z DATED: API~21-260-002 BANK OF CA,, NATI&i~AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION Secretary CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of ~ County of I n .'~ R nc~e. le~; ", On Rpf",lD.L, I(:~-I beforeme, '~f~o. cr,4. C.. fY~o~ec~- , NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER * E.G., 'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC' ',personallyappeared ~/~3ftb.~( ~.~'~t,,.Itcr nr,~t .'~'h~,,~ ~t~..t~J~.,.- , NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)+s/are ,,, subscribed to the within instrument and ac- ~ knowledged to me that F,~;/slfdthey executed the same in hi~-ha-r-/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by h~Aher/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER · TrrLE~S> [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] A'FI'ORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES zf DATE OF DOCt.?fMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITYlIES) SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ¢>1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION. 8236 Reinmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 EXHIBIT "A" I FGAI DFSCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES, AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCEL "A" That portion of Parcel 8 of Parcel Map No. 17454 in the City of Temecula, County of · Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 114, pages 4 through 9 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of centerline intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road as shown on said Parcel Map No. 17454, said centerline of Ynez Road being a curve concave easterly and having a radius of 2000.00 feet and to which said intersection point a radial line bears North 50° 28'55" East; THENCE northwesterly 549.93 feet along said curve through a central angle of 15° 45'16"; THENCE leaving said centerline Ynez Road on a line radial to said curve South 66" 14'11" West, 50.00 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 66" 14'11" West, 6.00 feet; THENCE North 23" 25'23" West, 24.44 feet; THENCE North 77° 03'09" West, 60.22 feet to a point on the northerly line of Parcel 5 of Parcel Map No. 7847 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 32, Pages 47 through 52 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County; THENCE North 21" 16'32" West, 61.93 feet to a point on the southerly line of said Parcel 8; THENCE North 47° 19'26" East, 59.56 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of Ynez Road, said right of way line being a non tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of 2050.00 feet and to which point a radial line bears North 70° 11 '51" East; THENCE southeasterly, 1 41.73 feet along said curve through a central angle of 3° 57'40" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion .~hereof lying within Parcel 5 of said Parcel Map No. 7847. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcel 11 of said Parcel Map No. 17454. Said Parcel "A" contains 1520 sq. ft., 0.035 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and easements of record. attached and by this reference made See Exhibit "B" hereto a pa ~'~' ' i~ ~'~' pw0 15\r:\cfd8 8 12\legais.don EXHIBIT "B'; PARCEL 8 P.M. No, 17454 P. M. 114/4-9 6' EASEMENT-'- . INST.tbS0731 RE{::;, 2-9'93 SCALE: I" = 60' BANK OF AMERICA 50' A.P.N. 921-260-002 BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT PARCEL II N47°Ig'26"E P.M. N o. 174 54 59,56' i' P.M. 114/4- 9 tl II ~,v'INCH.~K No. LS6240 F/// / /J LEGEND PARCEL CONTAINS __.N ?O o ~ ~, ~t,, E...LR ) EXI. ST.' BLDG.~H N 66° 14'11" E ,-~,~._,~= 15045, 16" t R = 2000' L = 549,9:3' T = 276.71' N 50028'55''E (R) p,O. 6,00' PARCEL 5 R M. No. 7847 P.M. :32 / 47 - 52 6' EASEMENT,,-~, I NST. ~r- 50727 REC. 2-9-93 II A II 1~0'*' $Q. FT. ~ O.O:3S'x"ACRES . KRIS R. WINCHAK SURVEYING - PLANNING (909) CITY OF TEMECULA SC~L_=: 1"=60' EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS DR,~wN BY: K.R.W. AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES CHEC~(ED BY: K.R.W. C.F.D. 88-12 (YNEZ ROAD ) CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT ,': Stateo Caliomia } On ~_~.L4 C~/,.~ bcforcmc, f ~ - " umyof LC5 ~9e/~'~ personallyappeared ['~. LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Cornre. Expires April 11, 1997 [wh. ~5 R~, ~W 5EC. 1 ROAD NAME - ¥nez Roa0 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT (Governmere Code Section 27281 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that interest in real property granted by easement dated from Osco Druo Inc. & Wells Famo Bank. National Assoc. to the CITY OF TEMECULA, is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Temecula on beheff of the public for Traffic Signal Facilities and Maintenance Purposes by the undersigned on behalf of the City Council pursuant to the authority contained in County Ordinance No. 669. Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Temecula PROJECT NAME - CFi~ i:t~,-12 w.O.a FOR RECORDER'S USE THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR RETURN TO: THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY CITY OF TEMECULA OF TEMECULA AND ENTITLED 43174 BUSINESS PARK TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. TEMECULA, CA 92, (Gov. Code 6103) By: Tim D. Sealer RCE 28738 Exp. 9130/94 City Engineer City of Temecula EASEMENT OSC0 DRUG INC. AND WELLS FARGO BANK. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, said facilities sh,.. ,nclude but not be limited to traffic signals, poles, traffic controllers, pull boxes, underground conduit, and detector loops for traffic control purposes, over, upon, across and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: SEE EXHIBITS 'A" AND "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. OSCO DRUGS, INC. DATED: Vice President DATED: APN. 921-320-027 Secretary WELLS FARGO BANK A NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Vice President ?,,'.,: ,,~',,.~.,,,~ fi, P .... ;' .. ': ...... ;.~ '~F~E.;,. ....... r~?,r,~ V;CE, PRESIDENT EXHIBIT "A" * I EGAL DFSCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCEL "A" That portion of Parcel 12 of Parcel Map No. 22863 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 150, pages 51 through 57 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Parcel 12, said corner also being a point on the easterly right of way line of Ynez Road; THENCE North 9° 00'39" West, 109.64 feet along said easterly right of way line; THENCE leaving said easterly right of way line South 65° 19'15" East, 43.27 feet; THENCE South 9° 00'39" East, 62.00 feet; THENCE South 47° 41'51" West, 43.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcel 13 of said Parcel Map No. 22863. Said Parcel "A" contains 351+ sq. ft., 0.008 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and easements of record. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. pw015V:~,cfd8812\legals.don EXHIBIT "B" SCALE: I"= 50' Z Z RHO- KRIS R. WINCHAK LAND SURVEYING - PLANNING (909) 698-8536 / / / ! CERT. PAR. .GER 593 INST. i 20884 REC, 6-23-89 PARCEL 15 N 65° 19' 15"W z/~,_4 3.27' ~o ' N 9°00'39'' W ~o0 ""'62.00' ,,~ ' ~,,,... 44°1 IE ' 3.0' "' P.O.B. MOST WLY, COR, PR, 12 50' OSCO - - . . . P, M, . NO, 22863 P, M, 150/51-57 SCALE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: L,L,A..~~= 2886 T INS . 201437 REC. 6-19-89 NOR LANDGRANT PARCEL 1:5 P.M. N0. 22863 P.M. 150/51-57 ~' RD. '~r C/~LIF. - LEGEND Y/////! PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 351 + SO. FT., 'O .O08+ACRES .. I"= 50' CITY OF TEMECULA EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS K.R.W. AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES K.R.W. C.F.D. 88-12 ( YNEZ ROAD } CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT $S. (da~) (No~) ~r~n~y ~o~ w me (~ pwv~ to me on ~e f nfishcw~ ~) evidence) w ~ ~e ~non(s) whose ~e(s) i~ subs~ to ~e ~n ~s~ent nd ~owl~ged to me mat h~sh~mey exe~ me ~e in ~j ~E A [ ~cr/~eir au~o~ed c~acity(ies), ~d ~t by his~er/~e~ sig~mre(s) :X ~..:i ~rson(s) ~ted, ex~u~ ~e ins~ent. ~..~:~..~.... ....... '~___ ~~~ ~.~ TWN. 8S RG. 3W SEC. I ROAD NAME - Ynez Road CEITTIFICATE OF ACCEFTANCE OF EASEMElT (Government Code Section 27281 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that interest in real property granted by easement dated from Wells Famo Bank. Netiorml Aeeocietjon to the CrrY OF TEMEQJLA, is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City .of Temecull on bettiff of the public for Traffic Signal Facilities and Maintenance Purposes by the undersigned on behalf of the City Council pursuant to the authority contained in County Ordinance No. 669. Grantee consents to recordetion thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: City of Temecule PROJECT NAME - CFD 88-12 FOR F~F-CORDER'S USE THIS INSTRUMENT IS FOR RETURN TO: OF TEMECULA AND ENT/TtB) 43174 BUSINESS PARK TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE. TEMECULA, CA 92 (Gov. Code 6103) By: TieD. Serlet RCE 28738 Exp. 9/30/94 City Enginee City of Temecule EASEMENT WELLS FARGO BANK. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PUI~POSES, said facilities shall include but not be limited to traffic signals, poles, traffic controllers, pull boxes, underground conduit, end detector loops for traffic control purposes, over, upon, across and within the real property in the City of Temecule, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: SEE EXHIBITS 'A' AND 'B' ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HBEOF. DATED: APN. 921-320-007 WRIS FARGO BANK /~,~O/I/IAL ASSOCIATION :e~n~ba~a ..~eeve-:Ba~Zey, Vice EXHIBIT 'A" I EGAI DFSCRIPTION AN EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL FACILITIES AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES PARCEL That portion of a parcel of land in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State · of California as described in Gram Deed to Wells Fargo Bank National Association in Instrument No. 438801 recorded December 3, 1990 in the office of the Riverside County Recorder, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of Parcel 9 of Parcel Map No. 22863 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 150, pages 51 through 57 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county; Said corner also being a point on the easterly right of way line of Ynez Road, said easterly right of way line being a curve concave easterly and having a radius of 1950.00 feet and to which point a radial line bears North 66° 40'06" East; THENCE northerly 121.19 feet along said curve through a central angle of 3 o 33'39"; THENCE leaving said easterly right of way line South 71 o 09'15" East, 46.03 feet; THENCE South 21 ° 33'31' East, 62.00 feet; THENCE South 28° 31'39" West, 45.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within Parcel 10 of said Parcel Map No. 22863. Said Parcel "A" contains 1698-t- sq. ft., 0.039 acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of way and easements of record. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. OF CA',~ pw015~r:\cfd8812\legals.don EXHIBIT II B I! A.P.N. 921- 320-007 ~ POR. LOT 17 8 18 TRACT 5554 M.B. 54/25-50 \ 6' EASEMENT GRANT DEED TO 50726 WELLS FARGO BANK REC. 2-9-9,~ INST. =w'438801 REC. 12-3-90 A= S° S? R= 1950' ~. P.O.B. L= 121.19' ~MOST WLY. COR. T= 60.61 PAR. 9 , SCALE: I"= 80' R'~.I'.',NC.R :.:.f~i....,,:-.:,,o.""r I PAR. I0 P.M. No. 22863 P.M. 150/51-57 1D' \ . ' ' PAR. 9 . '\ ~ ,/ LEGEND ~~ ' "c~¢ ' PARCEL "A" ~Y/'//~ CONTAINS ,69~Q, FT., O.~9~ACRES KRIS R. WINCHAK SC~L~: I"= 80' CITY OF TEMECULA' EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS LAND SURVEYING-PLANNING DR~WN B~: K.R.W- AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES {90~) 698-e5S6 CHECKED8~: K.R.W. C.F.D. 88-12 ~YNEZ ROAD) ITEM NO. I 1 APPROV~T~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 24, 1994 Rancho California Road Interchange Improvements Caltrans Cooperative Design Agreement PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8- 794, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR DESIGN OF THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS. BACKGROUND: The City is currently in the process of having plans and specifications prepared for the Rancho California Road Interchange Improvements which will include, widening the overcrossing from five (5) lanes to nine (9) lanes, the addition of a north bound loop entrance to I-15 and a realigned north bound exit ramp. This work will be performed on the State highway system and will require the approval of Caltrans for the proposed interchange improvements. The State has provided a Cooperative Agreement for Design of the proposed Phase I improvements, which outlines the items of work to be performed, the responsibilities of the City and State and what areas will be performed mutually by both the City and State. This agreement formalizes the individual components of the project as outlined in the approved Project Study Report. r:~agdrpt~94\0524\renchcal .agrlajp In summary the City will provide the background documentation necessary to prepare the construction plans and specifications including environmental studies, traffic analysis, Project Study Report, drainage studies and right-of-way documents, Caltrans will provide direction and review of all the background documents and processing through other State agencies. A detailed listing of each agencies responsibilities is presented in Attachments I and 2 on pages 11 through 14 of the Cooperative Agreement. The agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is anticipated from approving Cooperative Agreement No. 8-794. Attachment: Resolution 94- Cooperative Agreement No. 8-794 r:~agdrpt%94\O524~ranehcal .agrlajp RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-794, BETWEEN ~ STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND ~ CITY OF TEMECULA FOR DESIGN OF THE RANCHO CM,3FORNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS WItEREA~, Construction Plans and Specification have been prepar~l for the Rancho California Road Interchange Improvements which outline the individual project components identified in the approved Project Study Report. WHEREAS, this Cooperative Agreement No. 8-794 establishes the general conditions, types of improvements, responsibilities of each agency and what areas will be performed mutually by each agency. WHEREAS, additional agreements wiffi the Stab will be adopted by ~e Council for the construction of the improvements identified in the Cooperative Design Agreement. NOW, THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1. The City Council approves and authorizes the Mayor to sign the Cooperative Agreement No. 8-794 between State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a 'regular meeting held on the 24th day of May, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk r:~agdrpt~94\O524~ranchcal.agrlajp [SE L] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of May, 1994, by the following CO~CILMEMBE~: CO~CILMEMBERS: CO~CU-MEMBERS: CO~C~MEMB~S: vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: r:~agdrpt~g4~O524\ranchcal .agrlajp 08-Riv-15-4.6/5.2 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modification District Agreement No. 8-794 08204 - 341100 DESIGN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT, entered into on , is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and CITY OF TEMECULA, a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, referred to hereinas CITY. RECITALS (2) ('3) STATE and CITY, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 130, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways within CITY. CITY desires State highway improvements consisting of reconstruction of Rancho California Road Interchange in two (2) phases, Phase 1 for interim work and Phase 2 for ultimate work. This Agreement addresses Phase 1 only. Phase 2 will be the subject of a separate future Agreement. CITY desires interim work, Phase 1, improvements consisting of reconstruction of Rancho California Road overcrossing from five lanes to nine lanes, a left-turn lane for the existing southbound entrance-ramp, and a northbound loop entrance ramp on Route 15 at Rancho California Road in the City of Temecula, referred to herein as "PROJECT", and is willing to fund one hundred percent (100%) of all capital outlay and staffing costs, except that costs of STATE's oversight of environmental, design and right of way activities may be borne by STATE. This Agreement supersedes any prior Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) relating to PROJECT. (4) (s) District Agreement No. 8-794 Construction of PROJECT and responsibilities for ultimate work (Phase 2) will be the subject of a separate future Agreement. The parties hereto intend to define herein the terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be developed, designed, and financed. SECTION I CITY AGREES: (i) To fund one hundred percent (100%) of all preliminary and design engineering costs for PROJECT, including, but not limited to, costs for preparation of contract documents and advertising and awarding the PROJECT construction contract. (2) At CITY expense, to initiate and fund one hundred percent (100%) of the future ultimate work, Phase 2, portion of PROJECT and agrees to enter into a separate future Agreement to cover responsibilities and funding for Phase 2 of PROJECT. (3) To have a Project Report (PR), Environmental Document (ED), and detailed Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) prepared at no cost to STATE and to submit each to STATE for review and approval at appropriate stages of development. Project Report, final plans and standard special provisions shall be signed by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California. (4). To permit STATE to monitor and participate in the selection of personnel who will prepare the PR, conduct environmental studies and obtain the environmental clearance, prepare the PS&E, provide the right of way engineering services, and perform right of way activities. CITY agrees to consider any request by STATE to discontinue the services of any personnel considered by STATE to be unqualified on the basis of credentials, professional expertise, failure to perform in accordance with Scope of Work and/or other pertinent criteria. (s) Personnel who prepare the PS&E and right of way maps shall be available to STATE, at no cost to STATE., through completion of construction of PROJECT to discuss problems which may arise during construction and/or to make design revisions for contract change orders. 2 District Agreement No. 8-794 (6) Not to use funds from any Federal-aid program for design or acquisition of rights of way for PROJECT. (7) To make written application to STATE for necessary Encroachment Permits authorizing entry onto STATE's right of way to perform surveying and other investigative activities required for preparation of the PR, ED and/or PS&E. (8) (9) To identify and locate all high and low risk underground facilities within the PROJECT area and to protect or otherwise provide for such facilities, all in accordance with STATE's "Manual on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway Rights of Way." CITY hereby acknowledges receipt of STATE's "Manual on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Hiuhwav Rights of Way." If any existing public and/or private utilities facilities conflict with PROJECT construction or violate STATE's encroachment policy, CITY shall make all necessary arrangements with the owners of such facilities for their protection, relocation, or removal in accordance with STATE policy and procedure for those facilities located within the limits of work providing for the improvement to the State highway and in accordance with CITY policy for those facilities located outside of the limits of work for the State highway. Total costs of such protection, relocation or removal shall be in accordance with STATE policy and procedure. (10) To furnish evidence to STATE, in a form acceptable to STATE, that arrangements have been made for the protection, relocation, or removal of all conflicting facilities within STATE's right of way and that such work will be completed prior to the award of the contract to construct PROJECT or as covered in the Special Provisions for said contract. This evidence shall include a reference to all required State highway Encroachment Permits. (11) CITY shall require the utility owner and/or its contractors performing the relocation work within STATE's right of way to obtain a STATE Encroachment Permit prior to the performance of said relocation work. (12) To perform all right of way activities, including all eminent domain activities, if necessary, at no cost to STATE, in accordance with procedures acceptable to STATE, and in compliance with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations, subject to STATE oversight to insure that the completed work is acceptable for incorporation into the State highway right of way. 3 District Agreement No. 8-794 (13) To utilize the services of a qualified public agency in all right of way acquisition related matters in accordance with STATE procedures as contained in Right of Way Procedural Handbook, Volume 9. Whenever personnel other than personnel of a qualified public agency are utilized, administration of the personnel contract shall be performed by a qualified Right of Way person employed or retained by CITY. (14) To certify legal and physical control of right of way ready for construction and that all right of way were acquired in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws and regulations subject to review and concurrence by STATE prior to the advertisementlfor bids for construction of PROJECT. (15) To deliver to STATE legal title to the right of way, including access .rights, free and clear of all encumbrances detrimental to STATE~s present and future uses not later than the date of acceptance by STATE of maintenance and operation of the highway facility. Acceptance of said title by STATE is subject to a review of a Policy of Title Insurance in STATE~s name to be provided and paid for by CITY. (16) To identify and locate all utility facilities within the PROJECT area as part of its PROJECT design responsibility. All utility facilities not relocated or removed in advance of construction shall be identified on the PROJECT plans and specifications. (17) To be responsible, at CITY expense, for the investigation of potential hazardous waste sites outside of the existing State highway right of way that would impact PROJECT. (18) To be responsible, at no cost to STATE, for remediation of hazardous waste found on proposed State highway right of way to be acquired for PROJECT. SECTION II STATE AGREES: (1) To provide, at no cost to CITY except as noted in Article (7) of Section III of this Agreement, oversight of PROJECT and to provide prompt reviews and approvals, as appropriate, of submittals by CITY, and to cooperate in timely processing of PROJECT. 4 (2) (3) (4) District Agreement No. 8'794 To provide, at no cost to CITY except as noted in Article (7) of Section III of this Agreement, oversight of all right of way activities undertaken by CITY, or its designee, pursuant to this Agreement. To issue, at no cost to CITY, upon proper application by CITY, an Encroachment Permit to CITY authorizing entry onto STATE's right of way to perform.*survey and other investigative activities required for preparation of the PR, ED and/or PS&E. If CITY uses.*consultants rather than its own staff to perform required work, the consultants will also be required to obtain an Encroachment Permit. The permit will be issued at no cost upon proper application by the consultants. To be responsible, at STATE expense, for the investigation of potential hazardous waste sites within the existing State highway right of way that would impact PROJECT. SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: (i) All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California Transportation Commission. (2) The parties hereto will carry out PROJECT in accordance with the Scope of Work, attached and made a part of this Agreement, which outlines the specific responsibilities of the parties hereto. The attached Scope of Work may in the future be modified in writing to reflect changes in the responsibilities of the respective parties. Such modifications shall be concurred with by CITY's Director of Public Works or other official designated by CITY and STATE's District Director for District 8 and become a part of this Agreement after execution by the respective officials of the parties. (3) The Project Study Report (PSR) for PROJECT approved on April 7, 1992, by this reference, shall become part of this Agreement. 5 (4) (s) (6) (7) (s) (9) District Agreement No. 8-794 The basic design features (as defined in Attachment 3 of the Scope of Work for PROJECT) shall comply with those addressed in the approved PSR, unless modified as required for environmental clearance and/or FHWA approval of PROJECT. The design, right of way acquisition, and preparation of environmental documents for PROJECT shall be performed in accordance with STATE standards and practices current as of the date of execution of this Agreement. Any exceptions to applicable design standards shall be approved by STATE via the processes outlined in STATE's Highway Design Manual and appropriate memorandums and design bulletins published by STATE. In the event that STATE proposes and/or requires a change in design standards, implementation of new'or revised design standards shall be done in accordance with STATE's memorandum "Effective Date for Implementing Revisions to Design Standards", dated February 8, 1991. STATE shall consult with CITY in a timely manner regarding effect of proposed and/or required changes on PROJECT. CITY's share of all changes in development and construction costs associated with modifications to the basic design features as described above shall be in same proportion as described in this Agreement, unless mutually agreed by STATE and CITY in a subsequent amendment to this Agreement. In the event a construction contract for PROJECT is not awarded by April 7, 1997 and a time extension has not been granted by STATE, CITY shall pay STATE for all oversight costs incurred by STATE to date. STATE will bill CITY for all oversight costs to date, free of interest, within thirty (30) days after said deadline and CITY agrees to pay said costs within thirty (30) days after receipt of such billing. STATE may grant a time extension beyond said deadline if a finding by STATE is made that reasonable progress is being made and that a construction contract is likely to result within a reasonable period of time. If STATE charges CITY for oversight pursuant to Article (7) above of this Section III, the costs to be charged to CITY for STATE's oversight will include all direct and indirect costs (functional and administrative overhead assessment) attributable to such work applied in accordance with STATE's standard accounting procedures. If requested by CITY, STATE shall provide CITY with a final report pertaining to costs, incurred for STATE's oversight efforts within thirty (30) calendar days of CITY's request. 6 District Agreement No. 8-794 (10) If a finding is made that Federal and State regulations do not require mitigation of contaminated material in its present condition within the existing State highway right of way, CITY shall be responsible, at CITY expense, for any remedial action required as a result of proceeding with PROJECT. Locations subject to cleanup include utility relocation work required for PROJECT. (11) If Federal and State regulations indicate contaminated material within the existing State highway right of way presents a threat to public health or the environment, regardless of whether it is disturbed or not, STATE shall be responsible for the cleanup, at STATE expense. If STATE's cost to mitigate is increased due to PROJECT, the additional cost shall be borne by CITY. (12) The party responsible for funding the cleanup shall be responsible for the development of the necessary mitigation and remedial plans and designs. Remedial actions proposed by CITY shall be approved by STATE and shall be performed in accordance with standards and practices of STATE and other Federal and State regulatory agencies. (13) A separate Cooperative Agreement will be required to cover responsibilities and funding for Phase II and the PROJECT construction phase. (14) Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintenance of State highways different from the standard of care imposed by law. (15) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. District Agreement No. 8-794 (16) Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. (17) Prior to award of a construction contract for PROJECT, CITY may terminate PROJECT and this Agreement in writing, provided CITY pays STATE for all PROJECT oversight costs incurred by STATE prior to termination. STATE will bill CITY for all oversight costs to date, free of interest, within thirty (30) days of written notice of termination of Agreement and CITY will pay said amount within thirty (30) days after receipt of such billing. 8 District Agreement No. 8-794 (18) Except as otherwise provided in Article (17) above, this Agreement shall terminate upon completion and acceptance of the construction contract for PROJECT or on April 7, 1997, whichever is earlier in time; however, CITY's responsibility to initiate and fund Phase 2 work as specified in Section I, Article (2) of this Agreement shall remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS Director of Transportation CITY OF TEMECULA By Mayor By KEN STEELE, District Director Attest: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: Attorney, Department of Transportation CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS AND PROCEDURE: District Accounting Administrator District Agreement No. 8-794 SCOPE OF WORK This Scope of Work outlines the specific areas of responsibility for various project development activities for the proposed reconstruction of Rancho California Road overcrossing from five lanes to nine lanes, a left-turn lane for the existing southbound entrance-ramp, and a northbound loop entrance-ramp on Route 15~at Rancho California Road in the .CITY of Temecula. CITY will provide the necessary environmental clearance for this project. CITY will perform all studies to document the Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion (CE/CE) determination. STATE will sign the CE/CE determination sheet. If, during preliminary engineering or preparation of the PS&E, new information is obtained which requires the preparation of an environmental clearance document, this Agreement will be amended to include completion of these additional tasks by CITY. CITY and STATE concur that the proposal is a Category 3 as defined in STATE's Project Development Procedures Manual. CITY will submit drafts of environmental technical reports and individual sections of the draft environmental documents to STATE, as they are developed, for review and comment. Traffic counts and projections to be used in the various reports shall be supplied by STATE if available, or by the CITY. Existing traffic data shall be furnished by CITY. STATE will review, monitor, and approve all project development reports, studies, and plans, and provide all -necessary implementation activities up to, but not including,.advertisingof PROJECT. STATE will prepare the revised freeway agreement and obtain approval of the new public road connection(s) from the California Transportation Commission. All phases of the PROJECT, from inception through construction, whether done by CITY or STATE, will be developed in accordance with all policies, procedures, practices, and standards that STATE would normally follow. Detailed steps in the project development process are attached to this Scope of Work. These attachments are intended as a guide to STATE and CITY staff. 10 District Agreement No. 8-794 PLANNING PHASE ACTIVITIES PROJECT ACTIVITY RESPONSIBILITY STATE CITY 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS & DOCUMENT PREPARATION Establish Project Development Team '(PDT) Approve PDT Project Category Determination Prepare Preliminary Environmental Assessment Identify Preliminary Alternatives and Costs Prepare and Submit Environmental Studies and Reports Review and Approve Environmental Studies and Reports Prepare and Submit Draft Environmental Document (DED) Review DED in District X X X X X X X X X X 2. PROJECT GEOMETRICS DEVELOPMENT Prepare Existing Traffic Analysis Prepare Future Traffic Volumes for Alternatives Prepare Project Geometrics and Profiles Prepare Layouts and Estimates for Alternatives Prepare Operational Analysis for Alternatives Review and Approve Project Geometrics and Operational Analysis X X X X X X 3. PROJECT APPROVAL Lead Agency for Environment Clearance Certifies ED in Accordance with its Procedures Prepare Draft Project Report (DPR) Finalize and Submit Project Report with Certified ED for Approval Approve Project Report X X X X X 11 District Agreement No. 8-794 ATTACHMENT 2 DESIGN PHASE ACTIVITIES PROJECT ACTIVITY RESPONSIBILITY STATE CITY 1. PRELIMINARY COORDINATION Request I - Phase EA Field Review of Site Provide Geometrics Approve Geometrics Obtain Surveys & Aerial Mapping Obtain Copies of Assessor Maps and Other R/W Maps Obtain Copies of As-Builts Send Approved Geometrics to Local Agencies for Review Revise Approved Geometrics if Required Approve Final Geometrics Determine Need for Permits from Other Agencies Request Permits Initial Hydraulics Discussion with District Staff Initial Electrical Design Discussion with District Staff Initial Traffic & Signing Discussion with District Staff Initial Landscape Design Discussion with District staff Plan Sheet Format Discussion 2. ENGINEERING STUDIES AND REPORTS X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Prepare & Submit Materials Report & Typical Section Review and Approve Materials Report & Typical Section Prepare & Submit Landscaping Recommendation Review & Approve Landscaping Recommendation Prepare & Submit Hydraulic Design Studies Review & Approve Hydraulic Design Studies Prepare & Submit Bridge General Plan & Structure Type Selection Review & Approve Bridge General Plan & Structure Type X X X X X X X X 12 District Agreement No. 8-794 PROJECT ACTIVTTY RESPONSIBILITY STATE CTTY 3. R/W ACQUISITION & UTILITIES Request Utility Verification Request Preliminary Utility, Relocation Plans from Utilities Prepare R/W Requirements Prepare R/W and Utility Relocation Cost Estimates Submit R/W Requirements & Utility Relocation Plans for Review Review and Comment on R/W Requirements Longitudinal Encroachment Review Longitudinal Encroachment Application to District Approve Longitudinal Encroachment Application Request Final Utility Relocation Plans Check Utility Relocation Plans Submit Utility Relocation Plans for Approval Approve Utility Relocation Plans Submit Final R/W Requirements for Review & Approval Fence and Excess Land Review R/W Layout Review Approve R/W Requirements Obtain Title Reports Complete Appraisals Review and Approve Appraisals for Setting Just Compensation Prepare Acquisition Documents Acquire R/W - Open escrows and Make Payments - Obtain Resolution of Necessity - Perform Eminent Domain Proceedings Provide Displacee Relocation Services Prepare Relocation Payment Valuations Provide Displaces Relocation Payments Perform Property Management Activities Perform R/W Clearance Activities Prepare and Submit Certification of R/W Review and Approve Certification of R/W Transfer R/W to STATE - Approve and Record Title Transfer Documents Prepare R/W Record Maps X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 District Agreement No. 8-794 PROJECT ACTIVITY RESPONSIBILITY STATR CTTY 4. PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES Prepare and Submit Preliminary Stage Construction Plans Review Preliminary Stage Construction. Plans Calculate and Plot. Geometrics Cross-Sections & Earthwork Quantities Calculation Prepare and Submit BEES Estimate Put Estimate in BEES Local Review of Preliminary Drainage Plans and Sanitary Sewer and Adjustment Details Prepare & Submit Preliminary Drainage Plans Review Preliminary Drainage Plans Prepare Traffic Striping and Roadside Delineation Plans and Submit for Review Review Traffic Striping and Roadside Delineation Plans Prepare & Submit Landscaping and/or Erosion Control Plans Review Landscaping and/or Erosion Control Plans Prepare & Submit Preliminary Electrical Plans Review Preliminary Electrical Plans Prepare & Submit Preliminary Signing Plans Review Preliminary Signing Plans Quantity Calculations Safety Review Prepare Specifications Prepare & Submit Checked Structure Plans Review & Approve Checked Structure Plans Prepare Final Contract Plans Prepare Lane Closure Requirements Review and Approve Lane Closure Requirements Prepare & Submit Striping Plan Review & Approve Striping Plan Prepare Final Estimate Prepare & Submit Draft PS&E Review Draft PS&E Finalize & Submit PS&E to District X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 District Agreement No. 8-794 ATTACHMENT 3 DEFINITIONS Basic Design Features - A general description of the facility: PHASE i Widen Rancho California Road Overcrossing from five lanes to nine lanes to accommodate three thru-lanes in each direction, a left turn lane for the existing southbound entrance-ramp, and a dedicated right turn only to a northbound loop entrance-ramp. An additional lane will be added to provide for 'ultimate dual left access to the southbound entrance-ramp. Also, an entrance lane will add to the bridge width to provide for access to the full loop entrance-ramp. This design will provide two northbound entrance-ramps for route 1-15. The southeast quadrant northbound entrance-ramp will be a standard half loop. The northbound loop entrance-ramp will be a standard metered ramp with HOV bypass lane, two lanes tapering to a single lane entrance-ramp. The existing northeast quadrant to northbound entrance-ramp will utilize the existing diamond entrance-ramp re-aligned at the intersection to match the opposite northbound exit-ramp. The northbound exit-ramp shall be a two lane exit-ramp transitioning to three lanes at the intersection. The two lane exit-ramp will require approximately 1,300' of Auxiliary lane to be constructed. The traffic signals proposed by the current operational improvement project, at the Rancho California Interchange ramp intersections will need to be modified/relocated by this project. The southbound entrance/exit-ramps will remain, as existing. Additional right'of way. will need to be acquired by the CITY. Mandatory and Advisory Design Standards - Project concept approved by Ron Nelson, Headquarters Project Development Coordinator on March 13, 1992; Alan Glenn, Headquarters Geometric Reviewer; and Wade Hobbs, FHWA Area Representative; on March 3, 1992. 15 .ITEM NO. 12 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 24, 1994 Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvements Caltrans Cooperative Design Agreement PREPARED BY: ~Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8- 793, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR DESIGN OF THE OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENTS BACKGROUND: The City is currently in the process of having plans and specifications prepared for the Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvements which will include, construction of a four (4) lane overcrossing between Jefferson Avenue and Ynez Road with 800 feet of bridge and construction of sidewalks, storm drain system and landscape improvements. This work will be performed over the State highway system and will require the approval of Caltrans for the proposed overcrossing improvements. The State has provided a Cooperative Agreement for Design of the proposed Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvements, which outlines the items of work to be performed, the responsibilities of the City and State and what areas will be performed mutually by both the City and State. This agreement formalizes the individual components of the project as outlined in the approved Project Study Report. r:\agdrpt~94~O524~.ovedand.implajp In summary the City will provide the background documentation necessary to prepare the construction plans and specifications including environmental studies, traffic analysis, Project Study Report, drainage studies end right-of-way documents. Caltrans will provide direction and review of all the background documents and processing through other State agencies. A detailed listing of each agencies responsibilities is presented in Attachments I and 2 on pages 12 through 15 of the Cooperative Agreement. The agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is anticipated from approving Cooperative Agreement No. 8-793. Attachment: Resolution 94- Cooperative Agreement No. 8-793 r:~agdrpt%94%O524%ovedand .implejp RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMI~NT NO. 8-793, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND ~ CITY OF TEMECULA FOR DESIGN OF THE OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, Construction Plans and Specification have been prepared for the Overland Drive Overcrossing Impwvements which outline the individual project components identified in the approved Project Study Report. W!tEREAS, this Cooperative Agreement No. 8-793 establishes the general conditions, types of improvements, responsibilities of each agency and what areas will be performed mutually by each agency. WHEREAS, additional agreements with the State will be adopted by the Council for the construction of the improvements identified in the Cooperative Design Agreement. NOW, THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1. The City Council approves and authorizes the Mayor to sign the Cooperative Agreement No. 8-793 between State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 241h day of May, 1994. ATYEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk r:Xagdrpt\94%O524Xovedend .implajp STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMF_EULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 241h day of May, 1994, by the following CO~CK,MEMBERS: CO~CILMEMBERS: CO~CILI~~: CO~C~~ERS: vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN r:\agdrpt\g4\O524%ovedand.implajp 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 Overland Drive Construct OC 08204 - 354600 District Agreement No. 8-793 DESIGN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT, entered into on , is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and CITY OF TEMECULA, a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, referred to herein as CITY. (2) (3) (4) (5) RECITALS STATE and CITY, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 130, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways within CITY. CITY desires State highway improvements consisting of construction of a four-lane overcrossing structure at Overland Drive and Interstate Route 15 in the City of Temecula, referred to herein as "PROJECT,', and is willing to fund one hundred percent .(10Q%) of all capital outlay and staffing costs, except that costs of STATE's oversight of environmental, design and right of way activities may be borne by STATE. This Agreement supersedes any prior Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) relating to PROJECT. Construction of said PROJECT will be the subject of a separate future Agreement. The parties hereto intend to define herein the terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be developed, designed, and financed. 1 SECTION I 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 CITY AGREES: (i) To fund one hundred percent (100%) of all preliminary and design engineering costs, including, but not limited to, costs for preparation of contract documents and advertising and awarding the PROJECT construction contract. (2) To have a Project Report (PR), including Right of Way Data Sheet, Environmental Document (ED), and detailed Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) prepared at no cost to STATE and to submit each to STATE for review and approval at appropriate stages of development. Project Report, final plans and standard special provisions shall be signed by a Civil Engineer and Landscape Architect registered in the State of California. To permit STATE to monitor and participate in the selection of personnel who will prepare the PR, conduct environmental studies and obtain the environmental clearance, prepare the PS&E, provide the right of way engineering services, and perform right of way activities. CITY agrees to consider any request by STATE to discontinue the services of any personnel considered by STATE to be unqualified on the basis of credentials, professional expertise, failure to perform in accordance with Scope of Work and/or other pertinent criteria. (4) Personnel who prepare the PS&E and right of way maps shall be available to STATE, at no cost to STATE, through completion of construction of PROJECT to discuss problems which may arise during construction and/or to make design revisions for contract change orders. (5) Not to use funds from any Federal-aid program for design or acquisition of rights of way for PROJECT. (6) To make written application to STATE for necessary Encroachment Permits authorizing entry onto STATE's right of way to perform surveying and other investigative activities required for preparation of the PR, ED and/or PS&E. (7) To identify and locate all high and low risk underground facilities within the PROJECT area and to protect or otherwise provide for such facilities, all in accordance 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 with STATE's "Manual on Hiah and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Hiahway Rights of Way." CITY hereby acknowledges receipt of STATE's "Manual on High and Low Risk Underaround Facilities Within Hiahway Rights of Way." (s) If any existing public and/or private utility facilities conflict with PROJECT construction or violate STATE's encroachment policy, CITY-shall make all necessary arrangements with the owners of such facilities for their protection, relocation, or removal in accordance with STATE policy and procedure for those facilities located within the limits of work providing for the improvement to the State highway and in accordance with CITY policy for those facilities located outside of the limits of work for the State highway. Total costs of such protection, relocation or removal shall be in accordance with STATE policy and procedure. (9) To furnish evidence to STATE, in a form acceptable to STATE, that arrangements have been made for the protection, relocation, or removal of all conflicting facilities within STATE's right of way and that such work will be completed prior to the award of the contract to construct PROJECT or as covered in the Special Provisions for said contract. This evidence shall include a reference to all required State highway Encroachment Permits. (10) CITY shall require the utility owner and/or its contractors performing the relocation work within STATE's right of way to obtain a STATE Encroachment Permit prior to the performance of said relocation work. (11) To perform all right of way activities, including all eminent domain activities, if necessary, at no cost to STATE, in accordance with procedures acceptable toSTATE, and in compliance with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations, subject to STATE oversight to insure that the completed work is acceptable for incorporation into the State highway right of way. (12) To utilize the services of a qualified public agency in all right of way acquisition related matters in accordance with STATE procedures as contained in Right of Way Procedural Handbook, Volume 9. Whenever personnel other than personnel of a qualified public agency are utilized, administration of the personnel contract shall be performed by a qualified Right of Way person employed or retained by CITY. 3 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 (13) To certify legal and physical control of right of way ready for construction and that all rights of way were acquired in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws and regulations subject to review and concurrence by STATE prior to the advertisement for bids for construction of PROJECT. (14) To deliver to STATE legal title.to the right of way, including access rights, free and clear of all encumbrances detrimental to STATE's present and future uses not later than the date of acceptance by STATE of maintenance and operation of the highway facility. Acceptance of said title by STATE is subject to a review of a Policy of Title Insurance in STATE's name to be provided and paid for by CITY. (15) To identify and locate all utility facilities within the PROJECT area as part of its PROJECT design responsibility. All utility facilities not relocated or removed in advance of construction shall be identified on the PROJECT plans and specifications. (16) To be responsible, at CITY expense, for the investigation of potential hazardous waste sites outside of the existing State highway right of way that would impact PROJECT. (17) To be responsible, at no cost to STATE, for remediation of hazardous waste found on proposed State highway right of way to be acquired for PROJECT. (18) To be responsible, at City expense, to either protect in place, transplant or replace existing plants and irrigation that are removed as a result of construction of PROJECT. SECTION II STATE AGREES: (1) To provide, at no cost to CITY except as noted in Article (7) of Section III of this Agreement, oversight of PROJECT and to provide prompt reviews and approvals, as appropriate, of submittals by CITY, and to cooperate in timely processing of PROJECT. (2) (3) (4) 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 To provide, at no cost to CITY except as noted in Article (7) of Section III of this Agreement, oversight of all right of way activities undertaken by CITY, or its designee, pursuant to this Agreement. To issue, at no cost to CITY, upon proper application by CITY, an Encroachment Permit to CITY authorizing entry onto STATE's right of way to perform survey and other investigative activities required for preparation of the PR, ED and/or PS&E. If CITY uses consultants rather than its own staff to perform required work, the consultants will also be required to obtain an Encroachment Permit. The permit will be issued at no cost upon proper application by the consultants. To be responsible, at STATE expense, for the investigation of potential hazardous waste sites within the existing State highway right of way that would impact PROJECT. SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: (1) All obligations of STATE under 'the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California Transportation Commission. (2) The parties hereto will carry out PROJECT in accordance with 'the Scope of Work, attached and made a part of this Agreement, which outlines the specific responsibilities of the parties hereto. The attached Scope of Work may in the future be modified in writing to reflect changes in the responsibilities of the respective parties. Such modifications shall be concurred with by CITY's Director of Public Works or other official designated by CITY and STATE's District Director for District 8 and become a part of this Agreement after execution by the respective officials of the parties. (3) The Project Study Report (PSR) for PROJECT approved on October 1, 1991, by this reference, shall become part of this Agreement. (4) (5) (6) 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 The basic design features (as defined in Attachment 3 of the Scope of Work for PROJECT) shall comply with those addressed in the approved PSR, unless modified as required for environmental clearance and/or FHWA approval of PROJECT. The design, right of way acquisition, and preparation of environmental documents for PROJECT shall be performed in accordance with STATE standards and practices current as of the date of execution of this Agreement. Any exceptions to applicable design standards shall be approved by STATE via the processes outlined in STATE's Highway Design Manual and appropriate memorandums and design bulletins published by STATE. In the event that STATE proposes and/or requires a change in design standards, implementation of new or revised design standards shall be done in accordance with STATE's memorandum "Effective Date for Implementing Revisions to Design Standards", dated February 8, 1991. STATE shall consult with CITY in a timely manner regarding effect of proposed and/or required changes on PROJECT. CITY's share of all changes in development and construction costs associated with modifications to the basic design features as described above shall be in same proportion as described in this Agreement, unless mutually agreed by STATE and CITY in a subsequent amendment to this Agreement. (7) In the event a construction contract for PROJECT is not awarded by October 1, 1996 and a time extension has not been granted by STATE, CITY shall pay STATE for all oversight costs incurred by STATE to date. STATE will bill CITY for all oversight costs to date, free of interest, within thirty (30) days after said deadline and CITY agrees to pay said costs within thirty (30) days after receipt of such billing. (8) STATE may grant a time extension beyond said deadline if a finding by STATE is made that reasonable progress is being made and that a construction contract is likely to result within a reasonable period of time. (9) If STATE charges CITY for oversight pursuant to Article (7) above of this Section III, the costs to be charged to CITY for STATE's oversight will include all direct and indirect costs (functional and administrative overhead assessment) attributable to such work applied in accordance with STATE's standard accounting procedures. If requested by CITY, STATE shall provide CITY with a final report pertaining to costs, incurred for STATE's oversight efforts within thirty (30) calendar days of CITY's request. 6 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 (10) If a finding is made that Federal and State regulations do not require mitigation of contaminated material in its present condition within the existing State highway right of .way, CITY shall be responsible, at CITY expense, for any remedial action required as a result of proceeding with PROJECT. =Locations subject to cleanup include utility relocation work.required for PROJECT. (11) If Federal and State regulations indicate contaminated material within the existing State highway right of way presents a threat to public health or the environment, regardless of whether it is disturbed or not, STATE shall be responsible for the cleanup, at STATE expense. If STATE's cost to mitigate is increased due to PROJECT, the additional cost shall be borne by CITY. (12) The party responsible for funding the cleanup, addressed in Articles (10) and (11) of this section, shall be responsible for the development of the necessary mitigation and remedial plans and designs. Remedial actions proposed by CITY shall be approved by STATE and shall be performed in accordance with standards and practices of STATE and other Federal and State regulatory agencies. (13) A separate Cooperative Agreement will be required to cover responsibilities and funding for the PROJECT construction phase. (14) Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintenance of State highways ~ different from the standard of care imposed by law. (15) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, ~all officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. 7 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 (16) Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. (17) Prior to award of a construction contract for PROJECT, CITY may terminate PROJECT and this Agreement in writing, provided CITY pays STATE for all 'PROJECT oversight costs incurred by STATE prior to termination. STATE will bill CITY for all oversight costs to date, free of interest, within thirty (30) days of written notice of termination of Agreement and CITY will pay said amount within thirty (30) days after receipt of such billing. 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 (18) Except as otherwise provided in Article (17) above, this Agreement shall terminate upon completion and acceptance of the construction contract for PROJECT or on October 1, 1996, whichever is earlier in time. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS Director of Transportation CITY OF TEMECULA Mayor By KEN STEELE, District Director Attest: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: Attorney, Department of Transportation CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS AND PROCEDURE: District Accounting Administrator 9 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 Overland Drive Construct OC 08204 - 35460K District Agreement No. 8-793 SCOPE OF WORK This Scope of Work outlines the specific areas of responsibility for various project development activities for the proposed construction of a four-lane overcrossing at Overland Drive and Interstate Route 15 in the City of Temecula. CITY will provide the necessary environmental clearance for this project. CITY will perform all studies to document the Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion (CE/CE) determination. STATE will sign the CE/CE determination sheet. If, during preliminary engineering or preparation of the PS&E, new information is obtained which requires the preparation of an environmental clearance document, this Agreement will be amended to include completion of these additional tasks by CITY. CITY and STATE concur that the proposal is a Category 5 as defined in STATE's Project Development Procedures Manual. 3. CITY will submit drafts of environmental technical reports and individual sections of the draft environmental documents to STATE, as they are developed, for review and comment. Traffic counts and projections to be used in the various reports shall be supplied by STATE if available, or by the CITY. Existing traffic data.shall be furnished by CITY. 4. STATE will review, monitor, and approve all project development reports, studies, and plans, and provide all necessary implementation activities up to, but not including, advertising of PROJECT. STATE will prepare the revised freeway agreement and obtain approval of the new public road connections from the California Transportation Commission. All phases of the PROJECT, from inception through construction, whether done by CITY or STATE, will be developed in accordance with all policies, procedures, practices, and standards that STATE would normally follow. 10 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 Detailed steps in the project development process are attached to this Scope of Work. These attachments are intended as a guide to STATE and CITY staff. 11 ATTACHMENT 1 PLANNING PHASE ACTIVITIES PROJECT ACTIVITY 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS & DOCUMENT PREPARATION Establish Project Development Team'(PDT) Approve PDT Project Category Determination Prepare Preliminary Environmental Assessment Identify Preliminary Alternatives and Costs Prepare and Submit Environmental Studies and Reports Review and Approve Environmental Studies and Reports Prepare and Submit Draft Environmental Document (DED) Review DED in District 2. PROJECT GEOMETRICS DEVELOPMENT Prepare Existing Traffic Analysis Prepare Future Traffic Volumes for Alternatives Prepare Project Geometrics and Profiles Prepare Layouts and Estimates for Alternatives Prepare Operational Analysis for Alternatives Review and Approve Project Geometrics and Operational Analysis 3. PROJECT APPROVAL Lead Agency for Environment Clearance Certifies ED in Accordance with its Procedures Prepare Draft Project Report (DPR) Finalize and Submit Project Report with Certified ED for Approval Approve Project Report 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 RESPONSIBILITY STATE CITY X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 ATTACHMENT 2 DESIGN PHASE ACTIVITIES PROJECT ACTIVITY- 1. PRELIMINARY COORDINATION Request 1 - Phase EA Field Review of Site Provide Geometrics Approve Geometrics Obtain Surveys & Aerial Mapping Obtain Copies of Assessor Maps and Other R/W Maps Obtain Copies of As-Builts Send Approved Geometrics to Local Agencies for Review Revise Approved Geometrics if Required Approve Final Geometrics Determine Need for Permits from Other Agencies Request Permits Initial Hydraulics Discussion with District Staff Initial Electrical Design Discussion with District Staff Initial Traffic & Signing Discussion with District Staff Initial Landscape Design Discussion with District staff Plan Sheet Format Discussion 2. ENGINEERING STUDIES AND REPORTS -Prepare & Submit Materials Report & Typical Section Review and Approve Materials Report & Typical Section Prepare & Submit Landscaping Recommendation Review & Approve Landscaping Recommendation Prepare & Submit Hydraulic Design Studies Review & Approve Hydraulic Design Studies Prepare & Submit Bridge General Plan & Structure Type Selection Review & Approve Bridge General Plan & Structure Type 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 RESPONSIBILITY STATE CITY X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 PROJECT ACTIVITY 3. R/W ACQUISITION & UTILITIES Request Utility Verification Request Preliminary Utility Relocation Plans from Utilities Prepare R/W Requirements Prepare R/W and Utility Relocation Cost Estimates Submit R/W Requirements & Utility Relocation Plans for Review Review and Comment on R/W Requirements Longitudinal Encroachment Review Longitudinal Encroachment Application to District Approve Longitudinal Encroachment Application Request Final Utility Relocation Plans Check Utility Relocation Plans Submit Utility Relocation Plans for Approval Approve Utility Relocation Plans Submit Final R/W Requirements for Review & Approval Fence and Excess Land Review R/W Layout Review Approve R/W Requirements Obtain Title Reports Complete Appraisals Review and Approve Appraisals for Setting Just Compensation Prepare Acquisition Documents Acquire R/W - Open escrows and Make Payments - Obtain Resolution of Necessity - Perform Eminent Domain Proceedings Provide Displacee Relocation Services Prepare Relocation Payment Valuations Provide Displacee Relocation Payments Perform Property Management Activities Perform R/W Clearance Activities Prepare and Submit Certification of R/W Review and Approve Certification of R/W Transfer R/W to STATE - Approve and Record Title Transfer Documents Prepare R/W Record Maps 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 RESPONSIBILITY STATE CITY X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X. X X X X X X X X 14 PROJECT ACTIVITY 4. PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES Prepare and Submit Preliminary Stage Construction Plans Review Preliminary Stage Construction Plans Calculate and Plot Geometrics Cross-Sections & Earthwork Quantities Calculation Prepare and Submit BEES Estimate Put Estimate in BEES Local Review of Preliminary Drainage Plans and Sanitary Sewer and Adjustment Details Prepare & Submit Preliminary Drainage Plans Review Preliminary Drainage Plans Prepare Traffic Striping and Roadside Delineation Plans and Submit for Review Review Traffic Striping and Roadside Delineation Plans Prepare & Submit Landscaping and/or Erosion Control Plans Review Landscaping and/or Erosion Control Plans Prepare & Submit Preliminary Electrical Plans Review Preliminary Electrical Plans Prepare & Submit Preliminary Signing Plans Review Preliminary Signing Plans Quantity Calculations Safety Review Prepare Specifications Prepare & Submit Checked Structure Plans Review & Approve Checked Structure Plans Prepare Final Contract Plans Prepare Lane Closure Requirements Review and Approve Lane Closure Requirements Prepare & Submit Striping Plan Review & Approve Striping Plan Prepare Final Estimate Prepare & Submit Draft PS&E Review Draft PS&E Finalize & Submit PS&E to District 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 RESPONSIBILITY STATE CITY X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 08-Riv-15-6.1/6.3 8-793 ATTACHMENT 3 Basic Design Features - A general description of the facility: Construct a four lane overcrossing at the proposed alignment of Overland Drive at 1-15 in Riverside County, including approximately 1000 feet of roadway and bridge approach. The structure will accommodate two 12 foot through lanes with curb and sidewalk in each direction and will span ultimate route concept width of 1-15. Additional right-of-way will be acquired.by the City of Temecula. The project concept has been approved by Ron Nelson, Headquarters Project Development Coordinator, on March 13, 1992, Alan Glen, Headquarters Geometric Reviewer, and Wade Hobbs, FHWA Area Representative, on March 3, 1992. 16 ITEM NO. 13 ORDINANCE NO 94-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ~ AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING ~ TERM OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, PUBLIC USE PERMITS AND PLOT PLANS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE:CITY OF TEMECUIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Article XVHI, Section 18.30(0 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, and as amended pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-09, is hereby amended to read as follows: "f. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a plot plan shall be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the construction authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the plot plan, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. Each extension of time shall be granted in one (1) year increments only. An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director, on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be filed with the Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within thirty (30) days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, the Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a determination that the property and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. if an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the approval. The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligen~y to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a plot plan shall be determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance.' R:ord~X94--14 Section 2. Article XVIH, Section 18.28(0 of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as follows: *e. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a conditional use permit shall be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the construction authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the appwval shall be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the conditional use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. -Each extension of time shall be granted in one (1) year increments only.. An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director, on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be filed with the Planning DeparUnent, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within thirty 00) days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, .the Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a determination that the property and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the appwval shall not exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the appwval. The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is authorized,. which construction must thereafter be pursued diligently to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a conditional use permit shall be determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance." Section 3. Article XVIII, Section 18.2.9(e) of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as follows: *e . APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a public use permit shall be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the construction authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the public use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. Each extension of time shall be granted in one (1) year increments only. R:o~b~J-14 2 An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director, on forms In'ovided by the Planning Department and shall be filed with the Planning Depamnent, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within tl~r~ (30) days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, the Planning Director may appwve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a determination that the property and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the appwval shah not exceed a period of five O) years, calcuhted from the effective date of the approval. The term 'use' shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligently to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under-terms of thc authorized use. The effective date of a public use permit shah be determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance." Section 4. Notwithstanding the above, any plot plan, conditional use permit or public use permit which the City approved since incorporation and which has expired, may be reinstated pursuant to the procedure set forth above. In order to reinstate any such permit, the permittee must make an application to reinstate within 180 days of the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 5. Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any period or circumstance is held invalid, such invahdity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shah certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shah publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shah be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shah publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. ATTEST: Ronald Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] R:onis\94--14 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) crrY oF TEMECULA ) I, June 5. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temec~la, California, do henry ~'tify that the foregoing Ordinanc~ No. 94-14 was duly introduc~l and plac~ upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the I0 day of May, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temec~la on the 24 day of May, 1994, by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: R:ords~94-14 4 ITEM NO. 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITYOFTI~K'IH, A AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL~ CITY ATTORNEY ~ City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official May 24, 1994 Abatement of Hazardous Vegetation from Vacant Lots or Parcels per Ordinance 91-18, Chapter 6.16 RECOMM~-NDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Adopt a resohtion entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-5__~ A RESOLIYrlON OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF TF~- CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF 1AND Wf'HIN ~ CITY OF ~ FOR COSTS OF ABATElVIENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS WEEDS. DISCUSSION: During the period of May 3, 1993, through May 10, 1993, the posting of and thirty (30) day Notice to Abate was sent to legal owners of record of vacant properties that had been determined to contain potentially baTardous vegetation. All information on the appeals process was provided on the Notice to Abate. Agenda Report August 25, 1992 Page 2 During the period of June 10, 1993, through June 30, 1993, reinspection of the posted properties was made to identify those properties still containing hazardous vegetation. On June 10, 1993, two (2) contractors, approved by the City Council on June 8, 1993, were directed to begin clearing those vacant properties found to be still containing b_aTa_rdous vegetation. On March 7, 1994, a letter of demand was sent to the respective property owners whcre banrdous vcgetation was abated by City contractors. Attached, marked as Exhibit A, is a listing of the properties, that have been abated by the City' s contracton, with the amount of the protxned assessment to be recorded agnin~ the parcel. The costs listed include an ndmini.~a~ve fee of $200.88. The administrative fee includes the cost of Code Enforcement, Building and Safety, and Fire Department staff in the investigation and processing of these parcels. AH initial inspections and noticing was performed by Riverside County Fire' Department/California ~ent of Forestry sUtff. Appro2dmately July 1, 1993, the monitoring of this program was taken over by the City's Code Enforcement staff who will be responsible for the management of the hazardous vegetation program in succeeding years. City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 June 9, 1994 (909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999 Riverside County Recorder's Office County Administrative Center P.O. Box 1359 Riverside, CA 92502-1359 The following document is enclosed for recordation: Resolution No. 94-55 Confirmation of Special Assessments Against Parcels of Land within the City of Temecula for Costs of Abatement and Removal of Hazardous Weeds When placed of record, please return said document to this office. Enclosed also is a duplicate copy of this letter. Please stamp Book and Page Numbers and date of recording on the letter and return it to this office in the enclosed stamped, self-addressed envelope at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, City Clerk Document Number Book Number Page Number Date ~Printed on Recycled Paper. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOL~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_.C'ULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF 1AND WITraN THE CITY OF TEHEaILA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS W!zJ~S. WHE~E~,S, following a public hearing held on April 23, 1991, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Ordinance No. 91'-18 which became effective on June 28, 1991 and which provides for expedited abatement of hazardous vegetation from vacant lots and parcels, and; WHEREAS, said abatement of hazardous weeds has now been completed on each of the parcels as described in the attached list of parcels (Exhibit *A*), at a cost equal to the costs of abatement and removal of hazardous weeds on each such parcel; and WHEREAS, following a public hearing this Council has heard all objections of property owners liable to be assessed for the costs of abatement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, in regular session assembled on May 24, 1994, that the list of parcels and costs of abatement and removal of hazardous weeds for each parcel is hereby confumed and that said costs shall constitute special assessments against the respective parcels of land, and are a lien on said land in the mount of the respective assessments. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such liens shall attach upon recordation in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside of a certified copy of this Resolution, and that the City Clerk is hereby directed to make such recordation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the Treasurer-Tax Collector who shall enter the mounts of the respective assessments against the respective parcels of land as they appear on the current assessment roll, and shall collect said assessments at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary municipal ad valorem taxes as provided by Government Code 39577. P:XWv-I:r~S94-.RES -1- 05/13/94 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTF, n this 24th day of May, 1994. Ron Robens, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Glee. k, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CAI-I~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-m. RF-RY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of May, 1994, by the following roll call vote. COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: hne S. Greek, City Clerk P:\W~I=T~94-.RF, q -2- 05113/94 A · P · N · OWN'A'R/ADDRESS AMOUNT ASHESBED 92' 1-002 SOUKARMOSTAFA 2314 1ST AVE UPLAND, CA 235.88 921-192-003 LOUIE VEGA 29640 VIA OLVERA TEMECULA CA, 235.88 921-223-005 HILL WILLIAM 5466 EAU CLAIRE RANCliO PALOS VERDES, CA ' 235.88 919-292-010 DEGUZMANMANUEL R 23300 BIDLEE PL HARBOR CITY, CA 235,88 919-161-005 CHUNG JOHN W 6955 VIA EL ESTRIBO ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 235,88 919-100-008 BIRCHALL RICHARD 1617 PRINCE ST FALLBROOK, CA 285.88 919-100-009 DELONAIS AVIS I 5582 SPA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 235.88 919-210-006 FORD ROBERT D 812 W LADEREY ONTARIO, CA 235.88 91S 0-001 MARTIN GEORGE F 29825 OORTE FALDAS TEMECULA, CA 235.88 919-440-006 ASHBY JAMISON J 30298 MERSEY CT TEMECULA, CA 235.88 919-440-007 DECARL DAVID 22889 ARI CIR WILDOMAR, CA 235,88 919-262-001 LIVIE JAMES'H 91 LAVUELTARD SANTA BARBARA, CA 235.88 921-090-024 RANCHO CALIFORNIA DAIRY ASSOC NO 29377 RANCHO CALIF NO 202 TEr~ECULA, CA 335.88 921-090-039 RANCHO CALIFORNIA DAIRY ASSOC NO 29377 RANCHO CALIF NO 202 TEMECULA, CA 435,88 921-330-050 STERIC DAN C/O LEIGH WAXMAN 53 EDGAR CT 335.88 921-330-009 HAMRY BERNARD J 25381G ALICIA PKY NO 192 LAGUNA HILLS, CA 285.88 922-100-006 CHANG ROGER 425.88 A,P,No OWNER/ADDRESS AMOUNT ASBufSED C/O PM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 27840 DEL RIO RD 922-100-021 IMAKURA MASANOBU 3406 NW 59TH ST SEATTLE, WA 235.88 922-100-023 MICHAEL MERICA 26 ROLLINGWOOD LANE FALLBROOK CA 264.33 909-281-010 DEVELOPERS VENTURE CAPITAL CORP 27715 JEFFERSON NO 205 TEMECULA, CA 247.88 909-290-001 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 247,88 909-290-002 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RS 237.88 909-290-003 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/ORANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 237.88 909-290-004 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 237,88 909-290-058 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 247 ~ 909-290-059 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 247.88 909-290-038 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 237.88 909-290-039 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 237.88 909-290-040 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 237.88 909-290-041 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 237.88 909-290-044 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 237.88 909-290-028 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 247.88 909-290-029 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 24'~ OWNER/ADDRESS AMOUNT ASSESSED A .P .N. 90 ~0-030 909-290-031 909-290-032 909-290-033 909-290-034 909-290-035 909-310-002 909-310-003 90~ .0-004 909-310-005 909-310-006 909-310-007'- 909-310-008 909-310-009 909-310-010 909-310-011 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RO RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RO RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 C/O RANCHO PROPERTIES 24900 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD RANCliO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEM~CULA, CA RAN~O CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA RANCliO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, Ca RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, Ca RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, Ca RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, Ca RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, Ca RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, Ca RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, Ca RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, Ca 247,88 247,88 247,88 247.88 247.88 247.88 237.88 247.88 237.88 237.88 237.88 237.88 237.88 237.88 237,88 237,88 909-310-013 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO I 237.88 A,P,No OWNER/ADDRESS P O BOX 1075 AMOUNT ASSESSED 909-310-014 RANCliO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 237.88 909-310-015 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 247,88 909-310-016 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 247.88 909-310-017 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMXCULA, CA 247.88 909-310-018 RANCliO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 237.88 909-310-019 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 247.88 909-310-020 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 247.88 909-310-021 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 247.n~ 909-310-029 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 247.88 909-310-030 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 237.88 909-310-031 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 237.88 909-310-032 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 247.88 909-320-001 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 247.88 909-320-002 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 247.88 909-320-039 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 237.88 909-320-040 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 1 P O BOX 1075 TEMECULA, CA 237 A,P ,N. OWNER/ADDRESS AMOUNT ASSESSED 9.3 50-042 SHANGRILA HOMES TEMECULA LTD PAR C/O SHANGRILA HOMES INC 801 S GARFIELD AVE NO 201 435.88 914-480-005 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP C/O MISSION VIEJO NATL BANK P O BOX 7549 685.88 914-470-012 LIEFER CHARLES J 29801 CAMINO DEL SOL TEMECULA, CA 335.88 914-470-011 GROPP THOMAS L 746 W EASTER PL LITTLETON, CO 335,88 914-470-010 LIEFER CHARLES J 29801 CAMINO DEL SOL TEMECULA, CA 235,88 914-300-049 VANDERWAL ANDREAH C/O J VANDERWAL 992 CARNATION AVE 385.88 944-290-017 RANCHO VILLAGE ASSOC P O BOX 1027 TEMECULA, CA 380.64 945-060-020 LANNI J MICHAEL 1907 YACHT TRUANT NEWPORT BEACH, CA 385.88 94. ,0-010 VIERRA LEONARD J 30340 CALLE SONORA TENECULA, CA 285.88 945-180-013 SMITH BRIAN 27 VALLEY CLUB CIR NAPA, CA 335.88 945-180-006 GRAY RATHIE I 22339 N BEAR CREEK DR MURRIETA, CA 435.88 922-160-015 GARCIA JESUS V 348 N PROSPECTORS DIAMOND BAR, CA 335.88 950-040-013 KINNEY MICHAEL LEE 260 THE TOLEDO LONG BEACH, CA 335,88 950-040-015 KIESEL PAUL GLEN C/O DENDY REAL ESTATE & INV P O BOX 460160 335.88 950-100-001 RANCHO PROPERTIES P O BOX 1075 RANCHO CALIFORNIA, 487.98 950-100-015 RANCHO PROPERTIES P O BOX 1075 RANCHO CALIFORNIA, 335.88 950-100-012 RANCHO PROPERTIES 335.88 A, P .N · OWNER/ADDRESS AMOUNT ASSESSED P O BOX 1075 RANCliO CALIFORNIA, CA 950-100-013 RANCliO PROPERTIES P O BOX 1075 RANCliO CALIFORNIA, 380.88 955-050-017 ABUZIRADEL K 4828 NEST 121 STREET ALSIP, IL 435.88 950-070-006 DEPORTOLA RETAIL GENERAL PARTNER 43121 MARGARITA TEMECULA, CA 335.88 922-053-013 HERNING KARL S 28613 PUJOL ST TEMECULA CA 335,88 ITEM NO. 15 APPROVAL~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGER · CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer May 24, 1994 Temecula Town Association Assistance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider and provide direction to staff concerning interim assistance to the Temecula Town Association. DISCUSSION: In connection with the Community Service Funding (CSF) Program the City received an application from the Temecula Town Association (TTA) for assistance. Based on direction from the CSF Ad Hoc Committee consisting of Councilmembers Stone and Birdsall, this item was removed from the CSF program for separate consideration. During the past two (2) years the TTA has suffered two significant losses which have severely limited their ability to continue the October Harvest Festival events. The first was the reconstruction of the Temecula Community Center. Changes in building codes resulted in construction costs in excess of the insurance settlement. Then, in October 1992 the Temecula Rodeo was rained out and the rain insurance company refused to pay the claim because of a broken rain gauge on the Santa Rosa Plateau. As a result, the TTA has not been able to recover financially. Therefore, the organization is requesting the following: Two year loan in the amount of $265,000,at 4.5% interest, secured by a first trust deed on the Community Center building. The preliminary estimate of the value of the building and land is $1.2 million. Principle and interest will be repaid in 24 months from the proceeds of a first trust deed the TTA holds on another property which is due in one year, plus other fundraising activities. Further, the TTA will submit a grant request for the Community Services Funding Program for FY 1994-95, to provide assistance towards the 1994 Temecula Tractor Race. This item will be considered by the City Council with all other grant requests for Community Service Funding. FISCAL IMPACT: If the City Council desires to fund the loan it could be made from the General Fund. The cost to the City for this loan is negligible because the interest rate charged to the TTA is commensurate with the City's current investment earnings rate. Attachment: Temecula Town Association CSF program application Teacula Town Auociation Mrs. Mary Jane McLarney Finance Director City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Nay 16, 1994 Re: Application for Loan of $265,000.00 Temecula Town Association Dear Mary Jane: Enclosed please find the finalized budget for the Temecula Town Association for 1994, approved by the general membership on March 15, 1994. Please replace the reports we submitted in error with our grant application with these documents. At the time we did not have our budget complete or approved by the general membership. We put together the figures in a hurry to meet the deadline of the application for the grant. Since then, we made the decision to borrow $50,000.00 in order to retire past indebtedness. After approval by the general membership of this budget, the Board of Directors made the decision not to hold the PRCA Rodeo as it was not economically feasible for us to do so. Also, enclosed please find a year end consolidated income statement which updates the figures you have. Also, we wanted to point out that the last appraisal done on the Temecula Town Association's property was for $1,300,000.00 done December 16, 1991. This was before the Boys and Girls Club was put on the property; and before .the proposed park and roller hockey ring were on the drawing board. One other request we would like to make is to have our item listed first under council business as we hope to have a large turn out of people and organizations in support of us receiving this loan. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me. We wish to thank you and Mr. Shawn Nelson very much for your help and support. P.O. Box 435 Temecula, CA 92593 (909) 6'76-4718 Sincerely, ~hn E. Ste~'l i ng Pres i dent Temecula Community Center 28816 Pujol Street Fax (909) 694-9216 Temecula, CA 92590 To n , mciation February 10, 1994 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Community Service Funding Program Application Gentlemen: Please find enclosed an application for the Community Service Funding Program for the Temecula Town Association. In addition we have included some letters of support from the community. If you have any questions regarding this application please contact our Treasurer, Barbara Pearson, at 676-4718. Thank you in advance for your time concerning this matter. Sinc. erely John Sterling President gO. Box 435 'I~:n~ccula, CA 92593 (9(}91 6"6-~t'18 Fax (909) 694-9216 Temecula Community Center 28816-Pujol Street Temecula, CA 92590 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION (Please Prim or Type) Amount Requested: $ 6 0,0 0 0.0 0 F~oject Name: ( See Attached ) Project Staffing Date: onaoi ng Project Ending Date: Unknown ORGANIZATION'S BACKGROUND: Name of Organization: m~mpn,, 1 ;. Mailing address: . n Telephone: ( q n q ) Number of paid staff 2 Geographic area(s) served A] ] of R 7 ~ - 4 7 ~ R Year Founded 19 7 o Number of volunteers 'T'~=mpnn 1 R V~ 11 Is this organization incorporated in California as a non-profit organization? Yes If "yes".: × No Date of incorporation as a non-profit Federal identification number State identification number qq-t741 4~ 'n_Fir-,q~al R 19R~ I If "no": Name of sponsoring organization Its federal identification number Its state identification number This application has been authorized by the organization's: Executive Committee Board of Directors Members-at-large Include a copy of your statement of non-prof'~ status from the State of California CITY OF TEMECUL~ COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION (ATTACHMENT) PROJECT NAME: Operation of Temecula Comunity Center, "Temecula Talks" Television Program, Community Services. Great Temecula Tractor Race. PRCA Rodeo, other events for 1994. STATE OF CALIFORNIA "'~ANCHISE TAX BOARD :RAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 95867 hatch q, 1985 Temecula Toun Association P. O.Box q35 Temecula, CA 92390 In reply refer to 3q2=APP:KY:dh=g Purpose s Charitable Form o~ Organization : Corporation Accouh~ing Fe=zod Endlngz December 3~ Organization HumbeE : 0596q18 On the has-is o~ the information submitted and provlded your present operations continue unchanged or conform to those proposed in your application, you are exempt iron state franchise or income tax under Section 23701d, Revenue and Taxation Code. Any change in operation, character or purpose o~ the organization must be reported immediately to this o~ice so that Me .may determine the e~ect on your exempt status. Any change ot name or address also must be reported. You are required to file Form 199 (Exempt Organization Annual ? 'ormation Return) or Form 199B (Exempt Organization Annual - oormation Statement) on or before the 1Sth day of the Sth month (q 1/2 months) a~ter the close o~ your accounting period. See annual instructions with ~orms ~or requirements. You ~re not required to ~ile state ~ranchise or income tax returns unless you have income subject to the unrelated business income tax under Section 2373~ o~ the Code. In this event, you are required to ~ile Form ~09 (Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return) by the lSth 'day o~ ~he Sth month (~ 1/2 months) a~ter the close o~ your annual accounting pezio~. the organization is incorporating, this approval will expire unlass incorporation is completed uith the Secretary o~ State githin 60 days. Exemption from ~ederal income or other taxes and other state taxes requires separate applications. COPY ~arch q, 1985 Temecula Toun Association Corporate Humbet 0596.18 Page 2 This exemption is granted on ~he express condition ~hat ~he organization will secure ~ederel exempt"s~a~us wi~h ~he In~ernal Revenue Service. The organization is required ~o furnish a copy ~he ~inal de~ermina~ion le~er ~o the Franchise Tax Board ~i~hin mon%hs from ~he .da~e of ~his-le~er. This exemption e~fec~ive as ot February S, 198q. D. Hareid, Supervisor Central Audi~ Section Telephone (800) 8S2-5711 CCx Pa~ricia H. Birdsall Registrar o~ Chari{able Trusts COPY ,Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Temeoula To~n Aaaoolatton P.O. Box q35 TemeeuZa, CA 92390 Pemn to Center: Telephone Number: Refer Reply to: Dale:. Mr. LuperXn~ (202)566-5133 E=EO:R:5 J U N, 6 1988 Employer Zdentlfloatlon Number: Key Dtstrtot= Aooountlng Period Ending: Foundation Status Claslrloatlon: Effeottve Date or RullnS$ Advanoe Rullng Period Ends= 95-3Tqlq22 I~s Angeles Deoeeber 31 509(a)(2) November 20, 1985 Deoember 31, 1989 Dear Appllosnt= Based on 1aremarten supplied, and assuming your operations wtll be as stated In your application for reoognitlon of exemptlent we have determined you are exempt from federal 1neeme tax under seeflea 501(e)(3) or the Znternal Revenue Code effeottve on the date sho~n above. For the period prlor to November 200 1985 we hold you exempt under seerlos 501(o)(q) of the Code. By letter dated Hay 20 1988 you greed to aooept exemption under sootlos 501(e)(3) effeotlve beginlag on the date shown above ~hleh 1s ~he date or your applloatlon. Beesuse you are eonstdered a newly orested organization0 ve are not now makZng a rlnal determination of your foundation 8tatus under Code seerton 509(a). However, begtnn!ng' with the effective date. or this ruZlng, we have deternttned ~ha~ you ann reasonably be expeo~ed to be a publlely supported organlza~ton desertbed in the see~tons sbovn above. AccordinglY, you wtll be treated as a pubZtely supported organization0 and not as a private foundation, during the advance fullrig perled. This advance rullng period begins on the date you flled your applloatlon and ends on the date shorn above. Before the end of your advance ruling pertodt you v111 be asked to rurnZsh to your key Dlstrlot Dlreetor Information needed to determine whether you have met the requirements of the applloable support test durlng the advanoe ~ullng period. (Zf you reoetved a 2 or 3 year advance ruling, you w111 be glven an opportunity to extend the advanoe ruling ~o 5 years.) Zf you establish that you have been a publloly supported organ1- Teasouls Toun Association zation, you will be classified as a seotion'509(a)(1) or 509(a)(2) organi- zation as long as you continue to Beet the requirements of the applieshie support test. If you do not seer the publie support requirements during the advance ruling period (or do not request a~ extension to 5 years, if appropriate), you rill be classified as a private foundation for future periods. Also, if you are classified as a private foundargent you will be treated as a privs~e foundation from the errsolive date of your exemp- tion for purposes or sootion qgqO, uhioh imposes an exoise tax on your net investment income, and notion 50?(d), uhioh defines, in the event of termination of status, the qSreSate tax benefit derived Frog tax exemption as a section 501(o)(3) organization. Grantors and donors may rely on the advance ruling that you are not a private foundation until 90 days after your advance ruling period ends. If you submit the required information vithin the 90 days, grantors and donors may continue to rely on the advance ruling until un make a final determination of your foundation status. Heyavert if notice that you will no longer be treated as the 'type of organization shoun above is published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, grantors and donors may not rely on this advance ruling after the date of such publication. Also, a grant4r or donor may not rely on this determination if he or she van in part responsible for, or was aware of, the sot or failure to act that resulted in your loss of the foundation classification shown above, or if he or she acquired knowledge that we had given notice that you vould be removed from classification as the type of organization shorn above. If your sources of support, or your purposes, character, or Bethods of operation change, please let your key district know so that office can consider the effect of the change on your exempt status and foundation statue. Also, you should inform your key DIstrict Director of all changes in your name or address. Unless spentftoalZy excepted, beginning January 1,198q, you must pay taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (social security taxes) for each employee vho is paid $100 or Bore in a calendar year. You are not required to pay tax under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA). 3tnoe you are not a private foundation, you are not subject to the excise taxes under Chapter ~2 of the Code. However, you are not automatically exempt free other federal excise taxes. If you have questions shout excise, employment, or other federal taxes, contact your key Dlstrlot DIrector. Donors may deduct contributions to you made on or after the effective date shoun above, as provlded In seetlon 170 of the Code, Bequests, ~egactes, devlses, transfers, or glfts to you or for your use ere deductible for federal estate and glft tax purposes If they Beet the applicable Teasouls Tow Asssalaries provisions or soottons 2055, 2106, mud 2522 or the Code, elfsatire u of the date show above, You are requlred to rile Form 990, RetUrn of organization r-xempt from Znooee Tax, only If your gross reoelpte each year are normally Bore than $25,000. Zf your gross reoelpts are not normally Bore than we ask that you establish that you are not required to flle Form 990 by completing Part T Of that Form for your flrat tax year, Therealters you w111 not be requlred to fllea return untlZ your gross reoelpta normally exoeed the $25,000 minimum. For guldsnoe In determining If your gross reoelpts are "normally" not Bore than f~e $25~000 Zigire see the lestrust:Lone for the Form 990. Tf · return ls required0 It must be flled by' the 15th day or the flfth ·oath after the end of your 8anus1 assousting period. There 18 a penalty of $10 s day, up to a maximum or $5,000, when s return ls flled late unless you establish, as required by aeotlon 6652(d)(1), that the fallurn to file tleely was due to reasonable sauna, Tou are not requlred to flle federal teases tax returns unless you are subJest to the tax on unrelated business 1noose under Code seatlos 511. Zf you are subJest to ~hls taz, you BUSt flle an 1seams taz return on Form 990-Te Exempt Organization Buslease Zneoee Tax Return. Zn thls letter, we are not determining whether any or your present or proposed aotlvttlea are unrelated trade or business as dellned In seatton 513. Please shay your employer Identifiesties number on 811 returns you flle and In all oorrespondenoe vlth the Internal Revenue Setvise. We are informing your key DiaLriot Dlreotor or thls fullrig. Because thls letter oould help resolve any questions about your exempt status and foundation status, you should keep It In your poreanent feeerda. Zf you have any questions about this rultng~ please sentsot the person whose name and telephone number are show in the heading or this letter. For other'matters, inoluding questions assearning reporting requirements, please eastsot your key DistriaL Direstore Slnoerely yours, Enolosure: Chief, Exempt Organizations Rulings Branoh Copy or Form 872-C P.O. Box 944230 Sacramento. CA 94244-.0230 Phone: (916) 445-2020 STATEMENT BY DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION THIS STATEMENT MUST BE FIt. ED WTTH CAUFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE f~ECTIONS 6210, 8210, ge60 CORPORATIONS CODE) THE $5: LqUNG~ FitEE C0596&18 .U DUE DATE 0&-30-93 03755N TENECULA TOUN ASSOCZATXON P,O. BOX 635 TENECULA, CA 92593' DO NOT ALTER IraPIPPIN'flED NAME.. IF rr!M III ~I.ANIC, R.BAI! BN1]IR CORIeOItA~ NAME DO NOT WRITE IN THIS PACE PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK OF FORM. PLEASE TYPE OR ,USE' BLACK INK WHICH WOULD BE SUITABLE FOR MICROFILMING. STREET ADDReelS OF PRINCIPAL OIIFIC (IF NONIt COMPLETE 3-31) [OC) NOT USE P.O. 8ClX N(~.) C!'l'"~ AND MAILING ADDRESS THE NAMES OF' THE FOLLOWING OFFICBRS. ARE: CHIEF EXECt.rrTVE OFFICER SECRETARY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Cfi"Y AND S'rATE ~le loft 4a. C!"I"Y AND S"rAI~E ~ COOl El, Crr'Y AND STATE ~ CODE Crl"Y AND ITATI ~lm CQDI 7. bLAME 8. k,,ALIFORNIA J"rREET AODRF,.i~ IF A~II, NT I~ AN INDIVIDUAL 4D0 N{~T Uii P.O. 10 X) DO ~ _11,~"_~_~__~_ AQQIIIII IF I II A C~RFORAIlON ~"f'A~"c.~-,-A , C A ~ z~'.,:=, I ca. I DECLARE ;r~IAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS STATEMENT AND TO THE"~'~I~OF MY KNOWLII:N31 AND BILliF. IT IS TRUE. z/~c t't=~ G~,, r4,~;~. L~tc.~-,,.~ A, N,,Hz,:::~. I DATE TITLE TYPE OR PRINT NAME OR SI~'NING OPPlCER OR AGENT SIGNATURE City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program Application Page 2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Based on your organization'a last fiscal year) Balance Sheet as of Asset Cash and Investments Receivables (detail) Inventory Fixed Assets Other Assets Total Assets l?-~tl-cil (-q'~e Attached ) Iiabilities & Investments Current payables. $ Notes Payable Fund Balance Total Uability & Fund Balance Income Statement for the Year Ended 12 - 3 1 - 9 3 Income Fundraising $ Foundation grants $ United Way $ Government Funds $ Other sources $ I See Attached ) Expenses Salaries $ Operating expenses $ Community services$ Amount sent to nutional/p~rent organization $ Other expenses Please note with an asterisk any amounts that racluire additional explanation, and comment on these items, These are the most current financi~] reports for TTA. The association would greatly appreciate being considered for this qrant or if sufficient funas are not available to qrant total request, the association would like to be considered for a partial grant and partial loan to the total amount of request]. In addition, please attach the. organization's most recent treasurer's report, financial statements and footnotes. (It does not require a CPA's audit, but please submit if available.) TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, p. O. BOX 435, TEMECULA, CA. 92593 BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 1993 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS CASH ON HAND "CASH IN BANK TOTAL.CURRENT ASSETS FIXED ASSETS EQUIPMENT LAND " BUILDINGS EVENT PROPERTY LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS AUTO & TRUCK OFFICE FURNITURE COMMUNITY CENTER MISC. FIRE REPLACEMENTS COPYRIGHT FEES TOTAL FIXED ASSETS OTHER ASSETS CBDG FUND - RECEIVABLE CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT INSTALLMENT NOTE INSTALLMENT NOTE TOTAL OTHER ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS 100.00 9,115.14 24,625.53 100,786.00 47,423.86 153,016.49 13,740.65 4,385.00 7,465.18 434,101.83 9,613.36 1,850.00 1,835.68 10,000.00 87,143.13 108,775.53 9,215.14 797,007.90 207,754.34 1,013,977.38 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, P. O. BOX 435, TEMECULA, CA. 92593 BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 1993 LIABILITIES CURRENT LIABILITIES FICA WITHHELD FWT WITHHELD SWT WITHHELD SDI WITHHELD USAGE DEPOSITS TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES LONG TERM LIABILITIES LOAN-DAVID & CAROL CARSON DEFERRED GAIN ON LAND TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES TOTAL LIABILITIES CAPITAL TTA RETAINED EARNINGS INCOME PROFIT/LOSS TOTAL CAPITAL TOTAL LIABILITIES & CAPITAL 213.11 97.00 9.81 36.22 4,220.00 196,224.25 72,666.10 765,889.52 (25,378.63) 4,576.14 268,890.35 273,466.49 740,510.89 1,013,977.38 BY: BIRDSALL'S BOOKKEEPING SERVICES TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, P. O. BOX 435, TEMECULA, CA. 92593 INCOME STATEMENT CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT DECEMBER 31, 1993 CURRENT % YEAR-TO-DATE % INCOME DUES 240.00 .9 4,774.00 .8 USAGE 2,037.00 8.0 25'~696.50 4.2 USAGE-SECURITY 48.00 .2 233.40 .0 USAGE-CLEANING 1,245.00 4.9 2,730.00 .4 INSTALLATION .00' .0 1,598.05 .3 TV PROGRAM 300.00 1.2 3,000.00 .5 RENT 835.00 3.3 8,660.00 1.4 MISCELLANEOUS .00 .0 5,247.21 .9 BINGO 13,111.00 51.5 179,596.50 29.5 BREAKOPENS 7,467.50 29.3 108,264.50 17.8 FOOD COMMISSIONS .00 .0 - 240.00 .0 BINGO-MISCELLANEOUS 74.25 .3 1,198.00 .2 ADMISSIONS ,. .00 .0 108,732.98 17.9 BEER/BAR .00 .0 41,171.53 6.8 CARNIVAL .00 .0 3,123.93 .5 DRIVER ENTRIES .00 .0 3,875.00 .6 EVENT PARKING .00 .0 2,925.85 .5 RV PARKING .00 .0 2,160.00 .4 PROGRAM .00 .0 19,361.16 3.2 SOUVENIRS .00 .0 4,934.00 .8 SPONSORS .00 .0 26,435.00 4.3 VENDORS .00 .0 25,788.50 4.2 BUCKING CHUTE SPONSORS .00 .0 1,700.00 .3 PRE DANCES .00 .0 355.00 .1 MISS RODEO CALIFORNIA .00 .0 50.00 .0 POKER RIDES .00 .0 3,704.00 .6 MISS TEMECULA RODEO 100.00 .4 7,462.70 1.2 TEAM PENNING .00 .0 7,710.00 1.3 CONTESTS .00 .0 139.00 .0 ENTRIES .00 .0 5,90'2.00 1.0 BREAKFAST .00 .0 208.75 .0 'TEE SHIRTS. .00 .0 485.00 .1 I.C.S. ENTRIES .00 .0 525.00 .1 PEOPLE'S CHOICE .00 .0 87.00 .0 TOTAL INCOME 25,457.75 100.0 608,074.56 100.0 COST OF SALES BINGO 538.22 2.1 3,295.93 .5 BREAKOPENS 654.68 2.6 6,747.82 1.1 MISCELLANEOUS 109.84 .4 821.95 .1 TOTAL COST OF SALES 1,302.74 5.1 10,865.70 1.8 GROSS PROFIT 24,155.01 94.9 597,208.86 98.2 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, P. O. BOX 435, TEMECULA, CA. 92593 INCOME STATEMENT CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT DECEMBER 31, 1993 CURRENT % YEAR-TO-DATE EXPENSES ADVERTISING & PROMOTION .00 .0 AUTO & MILEAGE .00 .0 AWARDS 402.57 1.6 BAD DEBTS' (40.00) (.2) BANK CHARGES 12.00 .0 BLEACHERS .00 .0 BEER/BAR .00 .0 BREAKFAST .00 .0 CASH OVER/SHORT (270.30) (1.1) CONTRACT SERVICES 1,450.18 5.7 COMMISSIONS-PROGRAM .00 .0 COMMISSIONS-SPONSORS .00 .0 CONTINGENCIES .00 .0 DONATIONS-SERVICES .00 .0 DUES & PUBLICATIONS .00 .0 ELECTRIC POWER 2,000.00 7.9 ENTERTAINMENT .00 .0 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 2,350.00 9.2 INSTALLATION .00 .0 INSURANCE-GENERAL 1,148.42 4.5 INSURANCE-WORKMEN'S COM .00 .0 JUDGES .00 .0 KIDS FAIR .00 .0 LEGAL & PROFESSIONAL 5.00 .0 LIGHTING RENTAL .00 .0 LICENSES & PERMITS .00 .0 MEDIA DAY .00 .0 MISCELLANEOUS .00 .0 MISS RODEO TEMECULA .00 .0 OFFICE RENTAL .00 .0 OFFICE SUPPLIES iO0 .0 POKER RIDE .00 .0 PORTA POTTIES .00 .0 .POSTAGE 58.00 .2 PRCA FEES & JUDGES .00 .0 PRE DANCES .00 .0 PRINTING 456.00 1.8 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMEN .00 .0 PROGRAM .00 .0 PRIZES-BREAKOPENS 5,744.00 22.6 PRIZES-CASH 11,113.00 43.7 PRIZES-NON-CASH 537.00 2.1 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 1,092.00 4.3 RENT .00 .0 SCHOLARSHIPS .00 .0 SECURITY 354.00 1.4 23,895.54 '149.88 15,989.11 2,157.75 135.48 4,224.00 12,852.57 320.94 (493.30) 49,510.18 2,790.35 538.96 15,619.88 3,125.00 155.00 6,756.56 46,004.03 12,703.51 1,587.85 23,558.77 1,045.52 300.00 103.81 2,515.20 363.31 588.00 1,229.79 4,284.95 3,965.25 106.67 2,064.46 2,408.65 816.50 3,512.51 690.00 339.42 2,222.72 15.00 21,526.61 79,824.00 138,777.00 9,947.89 15,663.09 840.00 1,500.00 19,104.12 3.9 2.6 .4 .0 .7 2.1 .1 (.1) 8.1 .5 .1 2.6 .5 .0 1.1 7.6 2.1 .3 .0 .0 .4 .1 .1 .2 .7 .7 .0 .3 .4 .1 .6 .1 .1 .4 .0 3.5 13.1 22.8 1.6 2.6 .1 -.2 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, P. O. BOX 435, TEMECULA, CA. 92593 " INCOME STATEMENT CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT DECEMBER 31, 1993 CURRENT % YEAR-TO-DATE SET-UP 140.00 .5 1,925.00 SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT .00 .0 2,042.49 SIGNS .00 .0 1,479.01 SITE PREPARATION .00 .0 6,112.70 SOUND RENTAL .00 .0 1,500.00 SOUVENIRS .00 .0 944.02 SPECIAL EVENTS '92 .00 .0 12,393.19 STOCK CONTRACTOR .00 .0 16,085.00 SUPPLIES 73.45 .3 2,837.90 TAXES-PAYROLL .00 .0 1,483.11 TAXES-OTHER .00 .0 1,165.26 TEAM PENNING .00 .0 5,567.57 TEE SHIRTS .00 .0 3,473.43 TELEPHONE 665.46 2.6 5,119.97 TRASH DISPOSAL .00 .0 1,785.52 TV-PROGRAM .00 .0 2,815.00 UTILITIES 1,988.75 7.8 15,770.70 WAGES 946.00 3.7 14,288.25 WORK PARTIES .00 .0 2,234.42 TOTAL EXPENSES 30,225.53 118.7 634,359.07 PERATING INCOME (LOSS) (6,070.52) (23.8) (37,1so.2 ) % .3 .3 .2 1.0 .2 .2 2.0 2.6 .5 .2 .2 .9 .6 .8 .3 .5 2.6 2.3 .4 104.3 (6.1) OTHER INCOME INTEREST INCOME TRUST INTEREST INCOME CAPITAL GAIN/SALE OF LA TOTAL OTHER INCOME OTHER EXPENSES INTEREST EXPENSE TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES NET INCOME (LOSS) 32.48 .1 617.47 4,701.52 18.5 25,437.92 2,450.99 9.6 4,016.90 7,184.99 28.2 30,072.29 1,648.95 6.5 18,300.71 1,648.95 6.5 18,300.71 (534.48) (2.1) (25,378.63) .1 4.2 .7 4.9 3.0 3.0 (4.2) BY: BIRDSALL'S BOOKKEEPING SERVICES TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, P. O. BOX 435, TEMECULA, INCOME STATEMENT CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT NOVEMBER 30, 1993 CA. 92593 INCOME DUES USAGE USAGE-SECURITY USAGE-CLEANING INSTALLATION TV PROGRAM RENT MISCELLANEOUS BINGO BREAKOPENS FOOD COMMISSIONS BINGO-MISCELLANEOUS ADMISSIONS BEER/BAR CARNIVAL DRIVER ENTRIES EVENT PARKING RV PARKING PROGRAM SOUVENIRS SPONSORS VENDORS BUCKING CHUTE SPONSORS PRE DANCES MISS RODEO CALIFORNIA POKER RIDES MISS TEMECULA RODEO TEAM PENNING CONTESTS ENTRIES BREAKFAST TEE SHIRTS I.C.S. ENTRIES PEOPLE'S CHOICE TOTAL INCOME COST OF SALES BINGO BREAKOPENS MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL COST OF SALES GROSS PROFIT CURRENT % 280.00 .8 2,664.00 7.7 .00 .0 330.00 1.0 .00 .0 '300.00 .9 565.00 1.6 100.00 -3 14,700.00 42.6 7,854.00 22.8 57.00 .2 123.50 .4 .00 .0 .00 .0 2,738.93 7.9 .00 .0 .00 .0 .00 .0 48.39 .1 .00 .0 1,700.00 4.9 240.00 .7 .00 .0 .00 .0 .00 .0 .00 .0 330.00 1.0 .00 .0 .00 .0 1,485.00 4.3 208.75 .6 485.00 1.4 300.00 .9 .00 .0 34,509.57 100.0 467.09 1.4 1,243.33 3.6 .00 .0 1,710.42 5.0 32,799.15 95.0 YEAR-TO-DATE 4,534.00 23,659.50 185.40 1,485.00 1,598.05 2,700.00 7,825.00 5,247.21 166,485.50 100,797.00 240.00 1,123.75 108,732.98 41,171.53 3,123.93 3,875.00 2,925.85 2,160.00 19,361.16 4,934.00 26,435.00 25,788.50 1,700.00 355.00 50.00 3,704.00 7,362.70 7,710.00 139.00 5,902.00 208.75 485.00 525.00 87.00 582,616.81 2,757.71 6,093.14 712.11 9,562.96 573,053.85 18 4.1' .0 .3 .3 .5 1.3 .9 28.6 17.3 .0 .2 18.7 7.1 .5 -7 .5 .4 3.3 ..4 .3 .1 .0 .6 1.3 1.3 .0 1.0 .0 .1 .1 .0 100.0 .5 1.0 .1 1.6 98.4 EXPENSES ADVERTISING & PROMOTIO (187.oo) (.5) 23,89.5.54 4.1 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, P. O. BOX 435, TEMECULA, CA. 92593 INCOME STATEMENT CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT NOVEMBER 30, 1993 CURRENT % AUTO & MILEAGE .00 .0 AWARDS .00 .0 BAD DEBTS 235.00 .7 BANK CHARGES (103.56) (.3) BLEACHERS 2,250.00 6.5 BEER/BAR 3,674.00 10.6 BREAKFAST .00 .0 CASH OVER/SHORT (60..50) (.2) CONTRACT SERVICES 2,560.00 7.4 COMMISSIONS-PROGRAM .00 .0 COMMISSIONS-SPONSORS .00 .0 CONTINGENCIES 3.20 .0 DONATIONS-SERVICES .00 .0 DUES & PUBLICATIONS .00 .0 ELECTRIC POWER .00 .0 ENTERTAINMENT .00 .0 EQUIPMENT RENTAL (2,619.76) (7.6) INSTALLATION .00 .0 INSURANCE-GENERAL 2,077.48 6.0 INSURANCE-WORKMEN'S COM .00 .0 JUDGES .00 .0 KIDS FAIR .00 .0 LEGAL & PROFESSIONAL 200.00 .6 LIGHTING RENTAL .00 .0 LICENSES & PERMITS .00 .0 MEDIA DAY .00 .0 MISCELLANEOUS 159.26 .5 MISS RODEO TEMECULA 500.00 1.4 OFFICE RENTAL .00 .0 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160.98 .5 POKER RIDE .00 .0 PORTA POTTIES .00 .0 POSTAGE '269'.04 .8 PRCA FEES & JUDGES .00 .0 PRE DANCES' .00 .0 -PRINTING 197.18 .6 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMEN .00 .0 PROGRAM .00 .0 PRIZES-BREAKOPENS 5,771.00 16.7 PRIZES-CASH 11,101.00 32.2 PRIZES-NON-CASH 962.47 2.8 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 1,177.00 3.4 RENT .00 .0 SCHOLARSHIPS .00 .0 SECURITY 4,690.00 13.6 SET-UP 630.00 1.8 SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 229.68 .7 SIGNS .00 .0 SITE PREPARATION 255.20 .7 SOUND RENTAL .00 .0 SOUVENIRS .00 .0 YEAR-TO-DATE 149.88 15,586.54 2,197.75 123.48 4,224.00 12,852.57 320.94 (223.00) 48,060.00 2,790.35 538.96 15,619.88 3,125.00 155.00 4,756.56 46,004.03 10,353.51 1,587.85 22,410.35 1,045.52 300.00 103.81 2,510.20 363.31 588.00 1,229.79 4,284.95 3,965.25 106.67 2,064.46 2,408.65 816.50 3,454.51 690.00 339.42 1,766.72 15.00 21,526.61 74,080.00 127,664.00 9,410.89 14,571.09 840.00 1,500.00 18,750.12 1,785.00 2,042.49 1,479.01 6,112.70 1,500.'00 944.02 % .0 .0' .7 2.2 (.o) 8.2 .5 .1 2.7 .5 .0 .B 7.9 l.B .3 3.B .2 .1 .0 .4 .1 .1 .2 .7 .7 .0 .4 .4 .1 .6 .1 .1 .3 .0 3.7 12.7 21.9 1.6 2.5 .1 .3 3.2 .3 .4 .3 l.O .3 .2 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, P. O. BOX 435, TEMECULA, CA. 92593 INCOME STATEMENT CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT NOVEMBER 30, 1993 CURRENT % YEAR-TO-DATE SPECIAL EVENTS '92 .00 .0 12,393.19 STOCK CONTRACTOR .00 .0 16,085.00 SUPPLIES 72.25 .2 2,764.45 TAXES-PAYROLL .00 .0 1,483.11 TAXES-OTHER .00 .0 1,165.26 TEAM PENNING .00 .0 5,567.57 TEAM ROPING (25.00) (.1) .00 TEE SHIRTS .00 .0 3,473.43 TELEPHONE 816.86 2..4 4,454.51 TRASH DISPOSAL .00 .0 1,785.52 TV-PROGRAM 280.00 .8 2,815.00 UTILITIES 1,418.39 4.1 13,781.95 WAGES 882.00 2.6 13,342.25 WORK PARTIES .00 .0 2,234.42 TOTAL EXPENSES 37,576.17 108.9 604,133.54 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) (4,777.02) (13.8) (31,079.69) % 2.1 2..8 .5 .3. .2 1.0 .0 .6 .8 .3 .5 2.4 2.3 .4 103.7 (5.3) OTHER INCOME INTEREST INCOME TRUST INTEREST INCOME CAPITAL GAIN/SALE OF LA TOTAL OTHER INCOME OTHER EXPENSES INTEREST EXPENSE TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES .NET INCOME (LOSS) 33.89 .1 584.99 .00 .0 20,736.40 .00 .0 1,565.91 33.89 .1 22,887.30 1,649.82 4.8 16,651.76 1,649.82 4.8 16,651.76 (6,'392~95) (18.5) (24,844.15) .1 2.9 2.9 (4.3) BY: BIRDSALL'S BOOKKEEPING SERVICES City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program AQplication Page 3 Your Organization's Mission: Briefly describe the goals and objectives of your organization and the major community services it provides. Include discussion regarding the specific woys your organization meets the City's criteria listed on page 2. City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program Application Page 3 Organization's Mission Our mission is spelled out in our Articles of Incorporation as a (501(B)(3)Non-PrOfit Charitable Organization. They state specifically that our purpose ls to preserve the place name Temecula (accomplished). to promote and maintain the clrca 1890 architecture in Old Town (ongong) and to provide and operate a Community Center and other community facilities and services. We have provided major community services through our' annual events. scholarship awards. and providing free use of she Colnmunity Center to the City of= Temecula for Clty Councll i,,~etir~gs, City Commission meetings. Community Services ~ctix~lt. ies, County and State agencies, School functions, and Senior Cltlzen activities. Prlor to the incorporation of the C~ty of' Temecula in 1989 we made the facility available for candidates forums and following the electlon provlded the f~cllity for a big Clty Incorporation Party as well as a first Clty Birthday Party the following year. For dollar value of our contribution of free use of the Comn~unity Center during 1991. 1992, and 1993 please see the ~t. tached sheets which show dates and nature of use. The dollar amounts shown ane Nhat we would have received for such use at t. he going rental rates at those times. The figunes end wlth the month of ~une 1993 as that is the point ~t which we began charging the City for lts use of the Community Center. -more- Application Page 3 (con't) Pg. 2 As you will see from the attached, the value of our contribution in 1991 was $12,925, in 1992 it was $40,867 and $17,220 through the end of Ju~e in 1993, Thls ls a total of $71,012. In addition, following the fire whlch destroyed the Community Center in 1990 we set up operation in another facility for which we paid $2,800 per month rent and made it available to the City during that time at at a nominal fee for Council meetings and other City activities, The value of that contribution is estimated at $10,000, --DATE ..... ACTIVITIES. HOURS--- FEES TOTALS JANUARY 91 FEBRUARY 91 APRIL 91 HAY 91 JUNE 91 JULY 91 AUGUST 91 SEPTEHBER 91 OCTOBER 91 NOVEHBER 91 JAN 08 CITY COUNCIL JAN 15 CITY COUNCIL JAN 22 CITY COUNCIL JAN 29 CITY COUNCIL FEB 05 CITY COUNCIL FEB 07 POLICE NEIGBOR FEB 12 CITY COUNCIL FEB 19 CITY COUNCIL FEB 26 CITY COUNCIL APR 26 PARTNERS & PLAY HAY 03 HODELING HAY 10 NODELING NAY 17 CITY PLAN & ENG NODELING NAY 24 HODELING HAY 31 NODELING JUNE 07 NODELING JUNE 14 NODELING JUNE 21 NON&NE-NODELING JUNE 28 HOH&NE-HODELING JULY 05 NODELING JULY 12 JAZZ - NODELING JULY 19 HOH&HE-NODELING JULY 26 NON&NE-NODELING AUG 02 NON&NE-NODELING AUG 07 SENIOR ACTIVITY AUG 08 GEN PLAN NEIGHB AUG 09 NON&HE AUG 14 SENIOR ACTIVITY AUG 16 HON&HE AUG 21 SENIOR ACTIVITY AUG 23 NOH&NE AUG 28 SENIOR ACTIVITY AUG 30 NON&HE SEPT 06 HON&HE SEPT 13 NON&HE .' SEPT 20 HOH&HE SEPT 25 SENIOR ACTIVITY SEPT 30 TRASH CO OPENING OCT 02 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 04 HON&NE-NODELING OCT 07 NODELING OCT 09 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 11 NOH&HE-HODELING OCT 14 NODELING OCT 16 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 18 HOH&HE-HODELING OCT 21 NODELING OCT 23 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 25 NON&NE-NODELING OCT 28 NODELING OCT 30 SENIOR ACTIVITY NOV 01 HOH&NE-NODELING NOV 04 HODELING NOV 06 SENIOR ACTIVITY NOV 08 HOH&ME NOV 11 NODELING NOV 13 SENIOR ACTIVITY 11a-11p $150.00 11a-11p $150.00 11a-11p $150.00 11a-11p $150.00 11a-11p $150.00 7p-9p $125.00 11a-11p $150.00 11a-11p $150.00 11a-11p $150.00 9a-5p $250.00 lp-5p $150.00 lp-5p $150,00 10:30a-12p $150.00 lp-5p $150.00 lp-5p $150,00 lp-5p $150,00 3p-5p $125,00 .3p-5p $125,00 9a-5p $250,00 9a-5p $250,00 3p-5p $125.00 9a-5p $250.00 lOa-5p $225.00 9a-5p $250.00 9a-5p $250.00 lOa-3p $200.00 6p-9p $125.00 9a-5p $250.00 lOa-3p $200.00 9a-5p $250.00 lOa-3p $200.00 9a-5p $250.00 11A-3p $150.00 9a-5p $250.00 9a-5p $250.00 9a-5D $250.00 9a-5p $250.00 11a-3p $150.00 8:30a-10a $125.00 11a-3p $150.00 9a-5p $250.00 3p-5p $125.00 11a-3p $150.00 9a-5p $250.00 3p-5p $125.00 11a-3p $150.00 9a-5p $250.00 3p-5p $125.00 11a-3p $150.00 9a-5p $250.00 3p-5p $125.00 11a-3p $150.00 9a-5p $250.00 3:30p-5p $125.00 11a-3p $150.00 9a-5p $250.00 3:30p-5:30p $125.00 11a-3p $150.00 $150.00 $300.00 $450.00 $600.00. $750.00 $875.00 $1,025.00 $1,175.00 $1,325.00 $1,575.00 $1,725.00 $1,875.00 $2,025.00 $2,175.00 $2,325.00 $2,475.00 $2,600.00 $2,725.00 $2,975.00 $3,225.00 $3,350.00 $3,600.00 $3,825.00 $4,075.00 $4,325.0C $4,525.0~ $4,650.00 $4,900.00 $5,100.00 $5,350.00 $5,550.00 $5,800.00 $5,950,00 $6,200.00 $6,450,00 $6,700.00 $6,950.00 $7,100.00 $7,225.00 $7,375.00 $7,625.00 $7,750.00 $7,900.00 $8,150.00 $8,275.00 $8,425.00 $8,675.00 $8,800.00 $8,950.00 $9,200.00 $9,325.0( $9,475.00 $9,725.00 "$9,850.00 $i0,000.00 $10,250,00 $10,375.00 $10,525,00 DECEHBER 91 NOV NOV NOV NOV NOV DEC DEC DEC DEC DEC DEC DEC DEC 15 18 20 22 25 02 04 06 09 11 13 16 20 HOH&HE-HODELING HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY NOH&HE-HODELING HODELING HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY HOH&HE-HODELING HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY MOH&ME SEN DANCE-HODEL' HOM&HE 9a-5p $250.00 3:30D-5D $125.00 11a-3p $150.00 9a-5~ $250.00 3:30p-5:30D$125.00 3:30~-5p $125.00 11a-3~ $150.00 9a-5p $250.00 3:30p-5p $125.00 11a-3p $150.00 9a-5D $250.00 11a-5p $200.00 9a-5p $250-.00 $10,775.00 $10,900.00 $11,050.00 $11,300.00 $11,425.00 $11,550.00 $11,700.00.. $11,950.00' $12,075.00 $12,225.00 $12,475.00 $12,675.00 $12,925.00 DATE .... ACTIVITIES HOURS--- FEES TOTALS JANUARY 92 RATE CHG FEBRUARY MARCH 92 APRIL 92 JAN 03 JAN 08 JAN '10 JAN 15 JAN 17 JAN 22 JAN 24 JAN 27 JAN 29 JAN 30 JAN 31 92 FEB 02 FEB 03 FEB 04 FEB 05 FEB 06 FEB 07 FEB 10 FEB 11 FEB 12 FEB 14 FEB 18 FEB 19 FEB 21 FEB 24 FEB 25 FEB 26 FEB 28 MAR 02 HAR 03 MAR 04 MAR 06 MAR 09 HAR 10 MAR 11 MAR'13 HAR 16 MAR 17 MAR 18 MAR 20 MAR 23 MAR 24 HAR 25 MAR 27 HAR 30 MAR 31 APR APR APR APR APR APR APR APR APR APR APR MOH&ME SENIOR ACTIVITY MOH&ME SENIOR ACTIVITY MOH&ME SENIOR ACTIVITY HOH&ME MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY MODELING HOM&HE-MODELING MODELING SENIORS-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY MODELING HOH&ME SENIORS-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY MOM&ME-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY MOH&HE SENIOR-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY MOH&ME-MODELING SENIORS-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY MOM&ME-MODELING SENIORS-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY MOM&ME-MODELING SENIORS-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY MOM&HE-MODELING SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY MOM&HE-HODELING SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY 01 SENIOR ACTIVITY 03 MOM&ME-MODELING 06 SENIORS-MODELING 07 SENIOR ACTIVITY 08 SENIOR ACTIVITY 10 MOM&ME-MODELING 13 CITY BAKEOFF 13 CITY ARCH MTG 13 MAYOR BIRDSALL 14 SENIOR ACTIVITY 14 CITY COUNCIL 9A-SP $250.00 $250.00 11A-3P $150.00 $400.00 9A-5P $250.00 $650.00 11A-3P $140.00 $790.00 9A-5P $240.00 $1,030.00 11A-3P $140.00 $1,170.00 9A-5P $240.00 $1,410.00 3:30P-6:30P $150.00 $1,560.00 11A-3P $140.00 $1,700.00 3P-7P $185.00 $1,885.00 9A-5P $240.00 $2,125.00 2P-5P SUN $150.00 $2,275.00 11A-6:45P $250.00 $2,525.00 11A-3P $140.00 $2,665.00 11A-3P $140.00 $2,805.00 3P-5P $70.00 $2,875.00 9A-11A $70.00 $2,945°00 11A-6:45P $250.00 $3,195.00 11A-3P $140.00 $3,335.00 11A-3P $140.00 $3,475.00 9A-5P $240.00 $3,715.00 11A-3P $140.00 $3,855.00 11A-3P $140.00 $3,995.00 9A-5P $240.00 $4,235.00 11A-6:45P $250.00 $4,485.0r 11A-3P $140.00 $4,625.00 11A-3P $140.00 $4,765.00 9A-5P $240.00 $5,005.00 11A-6:30P $232.50 $5,237.50 11A-3P $140.00 $5,377.50 11A-3P $140.00 $5,517.50 9A-5P $240.00 $5,757.50 11A-6:30P $232.50 $5,990.00 11A-3P $140.00 $6,130.00 11A-3P $140.00 $6,270.00 9A-5P $240.00 $6,510.00 11A-6:30P $232'.50 $6,742.50 11A-3P $140.00 $6,882.50 11A-3P $140.00 $7,022.50 9A-5P $240.00 $7,262.50 11A-6:30P $232.50 $7,495.00 11A-3P $140.00 $7,635.00 11A-3P $140.00 $7,775.00 9A-5P $240.00 $8,015.00 11A-6:30P $232.50 $8,247.50 11A-3P $140.00 $8,387.50 11A-3P $140.00 $8,527.50 9A-5P $240.00 8,767.50 11A-6:30P $232.50 9,000.00 11A-3P 140.00 9,140.0( 11A-3P 140.00 9,280.00. 9A-5P 240.00 9,520.00 7:30A-4P 275.00'- 9,795.00 8:30-10:00 52.50 9,847.50 1P-4P 105.00 9,952.50 11A-3P 140.00 10,092.50 5P-7P 25.00 10,117.50 May JUNE JULY 1992 1992 1992 APR 15 APR 16 APR 17 APR 20 APR 21 APR 22 APR 24 APR 27 APR 27 APR 28 APR 28 APR 29 APR 30 Hay 01 HAY 04 HAY 05 HAY 06 HAY 08 HAY 11 HAY 11 HAY 11 HAY 12 HAY 12 HAY 13 HAY 15 HAY 18 HAY 20 HAY 22 HAY 26 NAY 26 HAY 27 HAY 29 HAY 12 HAY 26 JUNE01 JUNE03 JUNE04 JUNE05 JUNE08 JUNE08 JUNE09 JUNE09 JUNE09 JUNEIO JUNE12 JUNE15 JUNE16 JUNE17 JUNE19 JUNE22 JUNE22 JUNE23 JUNE23 JUNE23 JUNE24 JUNE26 JUNE29 JUNE30 SENIOR ACTIVITY CITY PLANNING DEPT HOH&HE-NODELING SENIOR-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY HOH&HE-HODELING HODELING HAYOR BIRDSALL SENIOR ACTIVITY CITY COUNCIL SENIOR ACTIVITY CITY OF TEH URGE HODELING SENIOR-NODELING SENIORS ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-HODELING SENIOR-HODELING HAYOR BIRDSALL PLANNING DEPT SENIORS ACTIVITY CITY COUNCIL SENIORS ACTIVITY SENIORS-HODELING SENIORS-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIORS-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY CITY COUNCIL SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIORS-HODELING CITY HEETING CITY NEETZNG SENIORS-HODELING SENIORS ACTIVITY CITY SPEC NTG SENIORS-HODELING HAYOR BIRDSALL HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY COUNCIL HEETING CITY HEETING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIORS-HODELING SENIORS-HODELING SENIORS ACTIVITY SENIORS ACTIVITY SENIOR-HODELING SENIORS-HODELING HAYOR BIRDSALL SENIOR ACTIVITY COUNCIL HEETING CITY HEETING SENIOR ACTIVITY HODELING SENIORS-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY 11A-3P 5P-lOP 9A-5P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P 11A-3P 9A-5P 3:30P-6:30P 1P-4P 11A-3P 5P-7P 11A-3P 9A-10:45 3P-5-P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P 11A-3P 10A-6:30P 10A-6:30P 1P-4P 6:30P-9P 11A-3P 5P-7P 11A-3P IOA-5P 10A-6:30P 11A-3:P IOA-5P 11A-3P 5P-7P 11A-3P IOA-5P 3P-11P 3P-11P 10A-6:30P IOA-3P 7:30P-lIP 9A-6P 1P-4P 2:30P-6:30P 11A-3P 5P-7P 3P-11P IOA-3P 9A-6P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P IOA-3P 9A-6P 10A-6:30P 1P-4P 11A-3P 5P-7P 3P-11P IOA-3P 1:30P-6P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P 140.00 170.00 240.00 262.50 140.00 140.00 240.00 105.00 105.00 140.00 25.00 140.00 25.00 105.00 262.50 140.00 140.00 262.50 262.50 25.00 25.00 140.00 25.00 140.00 210.00 262.50 140.00 210.00 140.00 25.00 140.00 210.00 325.00 325.00 262.50 170.00 185.00 270.00 25.00 140.00 140.00 25.00 325.00 170.00 270.00 262.50 140.00 170.00 270.00 262.50 25.00 140..00 25.00 325.00 170.00'- 140.00 262.50 140.00 10,257.50 10,427.50 10,667.50 10,930.00 11,070.00 11,210.00 11,450.00 11,555.00' 11,660.00 11,800.00 11,825.00 11,965.00 11,990.00 12,095.00 12,357.50 12,497.50 12,637.50 12,900.00 13,162.50 13,187.50 13,212.50 13,352.50 13,377.50 13,517.50 13,727.50 13,990.00 14,130.00 14,340.00 14,480.00 14,505.00 14,645.00 14,855.00 15,180.00 15,505.00 15,767.50 15,937.50 16,122.50 16,392.50 16,417.50 16,557.50 16,697.50 16,722.50 17,047.50 17,217.50 17,487.50 17,750.00 17,890.00 18,060.00 18,330.00 18,592.50 19,617.50 18,757.50 18,782.50 19,107.50 19,277.50 i9,417.50 19,680.00 19,820.00 AUGUST SEPT 1992 1992 JULY01 JULY03 JULY06 JULY07 JULY08 JULYIO JULY13 JULY13 JULY14 JULY14 JULY14 JULY15 JULY17 JULY20 JULY21 JULY22 JULY24 JULY27 JULY27 JULY28 JULY28 JULY28 JULY29 JULY31 AUG03 AUG04 AUG05 AUG07 AUG10 AUG11 AUG11 AUG11 AUG12 AUG14 AUG17 AUG18 AUG19 AUG21 AUG24 AUG25 AUG25 AUG26 AUG28 AUG31 SEPT01 SEPT02 SEPT04 SEPT08 SEPT08 SEPT08 SEPT09 SEPT11 SEPT14 SEPT15 SEPT16 SEPT18 SEPT21 SEPT21 SEPT22 SENIOR ACTIVITY MODELING SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR-MODELING MAYOR BIRDSALL SENIOR ACTIVITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY MEETING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR-MODELING MAYOR BIRDSALL SENIOR ACTIVITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY MEETING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY MEETING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-HODELING SENZOR-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVZT~ SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR-HODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY CITY HEETING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-HODELING SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY CITY COUNCIL HTG, CITY HEETING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR-MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR-MODELING MODELING SENIOR CRAFT SENIOR ACTIVITY IOA-3P 3P-5P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P IOA-3P 10A-5P 10A-'6:30P 1P-4P 11A-3P 5P-7P 37P-11P 10A-3P 1OA-5P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P 10A-3P 10A-5P 10A-6:30P 1P-4P 11A-3P 5P-7P 3P-11P IOA-3P 10A-5P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P 10A-3P IOA-5P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P 5P-7P 3P-11P 9A-3P 10A-5P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P 10A-3P 10A-5P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P 3P-11P 10A-3P 10A-5P 10A-6:30P 11A-3P 10A-3P 10A-5P 11A-3P 5P-7P 3P-11P 10A-3P IOA-5P 11A-6:30P 11A-3P 10A-3P IOA-6P 3:30-6:30P 11A-1P 11A-3P 170.00 70,00 262.50 140,00 170,00 230.00 262.50 25.00 140,00 25.00 325,00 170,00 230.00 262.50 140,00 170,00 230,00 262,50 25,00 140,00 25,00 325,00 170,00 230.00 262.50 140.00 170.00 230.00 262.50 140.00 25.00 325.00 200.00 230.00 262.50 140.00 170.00 230.00 262.50 140.00 325.00 170.00 230.00 262.50 140.00 170.00 230.00 140.00 25.00 325.00 170.00 230.00 262.50 140.00 170.00'- 260.00 90.00 25.00 140.00 19,990.00 20,060.0~ 20,322.5 20,462.50 20,632.50 20,862.50 21,125.00 21,150.00 21~290.00 21,315.00 21,640.00 21,810.00 22,040.00 22,302.50 22,442.50 22,612.50 22,842.50 23,105.00 23,130.00 23,270.00 23,295.00 23,620.00 23,790.00 24,020.00 24,282.50 24,422.50 24,592.5f 24,822.5L 25,085.00 25,225.00 25,250.00 25,575.00 25,775.00 26,005.00 26,267.50 26,407.50 26,577.50 26,807.50 27,070.00 27,210.00 27,535.00 27,705.00 27,935.00 28,197.50 28,337.50 28,507.50 28,737.50 28,877.50 28,902.50 29,227.50 29,397.50 29,627.5( 29,890.00. 30,030.00 30,200.00 30,460.00 30,550.00 30,575.00 30,715.00 OCTOBER1992 NOVEMBER 1992 DECEMBER 1992 SEPT22 CITY COUNCIL MTG. SEPT22 CITY MEETING SEPT23 SENIOR ACTIVITY SEPT25 SENIOR-HODELING SEPT28 SENIOR-HODELING SEPT29 SENIOR ACTIVITY SEPT30 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 2 HODELING OCT 5 SENIOR-MODELING OCT 6 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 7 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 9 MODELING OCT 12 SENIOR-HODELING OCT 13 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 13 CITY COUNCIL HTG. OCT 13 CITY COUNCIL OCT 14 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 16 MODELING OCT 19 SENIOR-MODELING OCT 20 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 21 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 23 MODELING OCT 26 SENIOR-MODELING OCT 27 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 27 CITY COUNCIL HTG OCT 27 CITY COUNCIL OCT 28 SENIOR ACTIVITY OCT 30 MODELING NOV 2 SENIOR-MODELING NOV 4 SENIOR ACTIVITY NOV 6 MODELING NOV 9 SENIOR -MODEL NOV 10 SENIOR ACTIVITY NOV 10 CITY COUNCIL MTG NOV 10 CITY COUNCIL NOV 11 SENIOR ACTIVITY NOV '13 MODELING. NOV 16 SENIORS - MODEL NOV 17 SENIOR ACTIVITY NOV 18 SENIOR ACTIVITY NOV 20 MODELING NOV 23 SENIOR-MODELING NOV 24 SENIOR ACTIVITY NOV 24 CITY COUNCIL MTG NOV 24 CITY COUNCIL NOV 25 SENIOR ACTIVITY NOV 30 SENIOR-MODELING DEC 1 DEC 2 DEC 4 DEC 7 DEC 8 DEC 8 DEC 8 DEC 9 SENIOR ACTIVITY SENIOR ACTIVITY MODELING SENIOR - MODELING SENIOR ACTIVITY CITY COUNCIL MTG CITY COUNCIL SENIOR ACTIVITY DEC 11 MODELING DEC 14 SENIOR ACTIVITY DEC 15 SENIOR ACTIVITY 5P-7P 3P-11P IOA-3P IOA-6P 11A-6:30P 11A-3P IOA-3P 3P-6P IOA-6P IOA -3P 11A-3P 3P -6P IOA - 6P 11A - 3P 5P - 7P 3P - 11P 11A - 3P 3P - 6P IOA - 6P IOA - 3P 11A - 3P 3P - 6P IOA - 6P IOA - 3P 5P - 7P 3P - 11P 11A - 3P 3P - 6P IOA -6P 11A -3P 3P-6P 11A - 6P 11A- 3P 5P - 7P 3P - 11P 11A - 3P 3P - 6P 11A - 6P 11A - 3P 11A - 3P 3P - 6P IOA - 3P 11A - 3P 5P - 7P 3P - 11P 11A - 3P 11A - 6P 11A - 3P 11A - 3P 3P - 6P 11A - 3P 11A - 3P 5P -7P 3P - 11P 11A - 3P 3P - 6P 11A - 3P 11A - 3P 25.00 30,740.00 325.00 31,065.00 170.00 31,235.00 260.00 31,495.00 262.50 31,757.50 140.00 31,897.50 170.00 32,067.50 140.00 32,207.50 260.00 32,467.50 170.00 32,637.50 140.00 32,777.50 140.00 32,917.50 260.00 33,177.50 140.00 33,317.50 25.00 33,342.50 325.00 33,667.50 140.00 33,807.50 140.00 33,947.50 260.00 34,207.50 170.00 34,377.50 140.00 34,517.50 140.00 34,657.50 170.00 34,827.50 260.00 35,085.50 25.00 35,112.50 325.00 35,437.50 140.00 35,577.50 140.00 35,715.50 260.00 35,977.50 140.00 36,117.50 140.00 36,257.50 260.00 36,517.50 140.00 36,657.50 25.00 36,682.50 325.00 37,007.50 140.00 37,147.50 140.00 37,287.50 260~00 37,547.50 140.00 37,687.50 140.00 37,827.50 140.00 37,967.50 140.00 38,107.50 140.00 38,247.50 25.00 38,272.50 325.00 38,597.50 140.00 38,737.50 260.00 38,997.50 140.00 39,137.50 140.00 39,277.50 140.00 39,414.50 260.00 39,677.50 140.00 39,817.50 25.00 39,842.50 325.00'-40,167.50 140.00 40,307.50 140.00 40,447.50 140.00 40,587.50 140.00 40,727.50 DEC 16 SENZOR ACTIVZTY 11A - 3P 140. O0 40,867.50 DATE JANUARY 93 JAN 04 JAN 05 JAN 06 JAN 08 JAN 11 JAN 12 JAN 12 JAN '13 JAN 18 JAN 19 JAN 20 JAN 25 JAN 26 JAN 26 JAN 27 FEBRUARY 93 FEB 01 FEB 02 FEB 03 FEB 08 FEB 09 FEB 09 FEB 10 FEB 10 FEB 16 FEB 16 FEB 17 FEB 22 FEB 23 FEB 23 FEB 24 MARCH 93 MAR 01 MAR 01 HAR 02 MAR 03 MAR 05 MAR 08 MAR 08 MAR 09 MAR 09 MAR 10 MAR 12 MAR 15 MAR 15 MAR 16 MAR 17 MAR 19 HAR 22 MAR 22 MAR 23 MAR 23 HAR 24 MAR 26 HAR 29 MAR 29 HAR 30 HAR 31 APRIL 93 APR 01 APR 02 ACTIVITIES HOURS SENIORS 10:30-3 P SENIORS 11-3 P SENIORS 10-3 P MODELING 3-5 PM SENIORS 10:30-3 P SENIORS 11-3 P CITY COUN. 7PH SENIORS 10-3 P SENIORS 10:30-3 P SENIORS 11-3 P SENIORS 10-3 P SENIORS 10:30-3 P SENIORS 11-3 P CITY COUN. 7 PM SENIORS 10-3 P SENIORS 10:30-3 P SENIORS 11-3 P SENIORS 10-3 P SENIORS 10:30-3 P SENIORS 11-3 P CITY COUN. 7 PM SENIORS 10-3 P CITY COUN. 7 PM SENIORS 11-3 P CITY COUN. 7 PH SENIORS 10-3 P SENIORS 10:30-3 P SENIORS 11-3 P CITY COUN. 7 PM SENIORS 10-3 P SENIORS 10:30-3 P MODELING 3:30-5 SENIORS 11-3 P SENIORS 10-3 P HODELING' 3:30-5 P ~ENIORS 10:30-3 P MODELING 3:30-5 SENIORS 11-3 P CITY COUN. 7 PM SENIORS 10-3 P MODELING 3:30-5 P SENIORS 10:30-3 P MODELING 3:30-5 SENIORS 11-3 P SENIORS 10-3 P MODELING 3:30-5 P SENIORS 10:30-3 MODELING 3:30-5 P SENIORS 11-3 P CITY COUN. 7 PM SENIORS 10-3 P MODELING 3:30-5 SENIORS 10:30-3 MODELING 3:30-5 SENIORS 11-3 P SENIORS 10-3 P SENIORS 8A-12NOON SENIORS 8A-2 P FEES TOTALS 25.00 ~ 25.00 212.00 237.00 265.00 502.00 106.00 608.00 25.00 633.00 212.00 845.00 212.00 1,057.00 265.00 1,322.00 25.00 1,347.00 212.00. 1,559.00 265.00 1,824.00 25.00 149.00 212.00 2,061.00 212.00 2,273.00 265.00 2,538.00 25.00 2,563.00 212.00 2,775.00 265.00 3,040.00 25.00 3,065.00 212.00 3,277.00 212.00 3,489.00 265.00 3,754.00 212.00 3,966.00 212.00 4,178.00 212.00 4,390.00 265.00 4,655.00 25.00 4,680.00 212.00 4,892.00 212.00 5,104.00 265.00 5,369.00 25.00 5,394.00 80.00 5,474.00 212.00 5,686.00 265.00 5,951.00 80.00 6,031.00 25.00 6,056.00 80.00 6,136.00 212.00 6,348.00 212.00 6,560.00 265.00 6,825.00 80.00 6,905.00 25.00 6,930.00 25.00 6,955.00 212.00 7,167.00 265.00 7,432.00 80.00 7,512.00 25.00 7,537.00 80.00 7,617.00 212.00 7,829.00 212.00 8,041.00 265.00 8~306.00 80.00 8,386.00 25.00 8,411.00 80.00 8'~491.00 212.00 8,703.00 265.00 8,968.00 212.00 9,180.00 318.00 9,498.00 HAY JUNE APR 05 SENIORS 11-2 P APR 06 SENIORS 11-3 P APR 07 SENIORS 10-3 P APR 12 SENIORS 11-2 P APR 13 SENIORS 11-3 P APR 13 CITY COUN. 7 PN APR 14 SENIORS 10-3 P APR 19 SENIORS 11-2 P APR 20 SENIORS 11-3 P APR 20 CITY COUN. 7 PH APR 21 SENIORS 11-3 P APR 26 SENIORS 11-2 P APR 27 SENIORS 11-3 P APR 27 CITY COUN. 7 PH APR 28 SENIORS 10-3 P 93 HAY 03 SENIORS 11-2 P HAY 04 SENIORS 11-2 P HAY 04 CITY COUN. 7 PH HAY 05 SENIORS 10-3 P HAY 10 SENIORS 11-2 P HAY 11 SENIORS 11-3 P HAY 11 CITY COUN. 7 PN HAY 12 SENIORS 10-3 P HAY 17 SENIORS 11-2 P HAY 18 SENIORS 11-3 P HAY 18 CITY COUN. 7 PH HAY 19 SENIORS 10-3 P HAY 24 SENIORS 11-2 P HAY 25 SENIORS 11-3 P NAY 25 CITY COUN. 7 PH HAY 26 SENIORS 10-3 P HAY 31 SENIORS 11-2 P 93 JUN 01 SENIORS 11-1:30 P JUN 02 SENIORS 11-1P JUN 07 SENIORS 10:30-1P JUN 08 SENIORS 11-1:30 P JUN 08 CITY COUN. 7 PH JUN 09 SENIORS 14-1PH JUN t4 SENIORS 10:30-i P JUN 15 SENIORS 11:30-1P JUN 15 CITY COUN. 7 PH JUN 16 SENIORS 11-1P JUN 21 SENIORS 10:30-1P JUN 22 SENIORS 11-1P JUN 22 CITY COUN. 7 PH JUN 23 SENIORS 11-1P JUN 28 SENIORS 10:30-1P JUN 29 SENIORS 11:30-1P JUN 29 SENIORS 11-1P JUN 30 SENIORS 11-1P 25.00 9,523.00 212.00 9,735.00 265.00 10,000.00 25.00 10,025.00 212.00 10,237.00 212.00 10,449.00 265.00 10,714.00 25.00 10,739.00 212.00 10,951.00 212.00 11,163.00 212.00 11,375.00 25.00 11,400.00 212.00 11,612.00 212.00 11,824.00 265.00 12,089.00 25.00 12,114.00 25.00 12,139.00 212.00 12,351.00 265.00 12,616.00 25.00 12,641.00 212.00 12,853.00 212.00 13,065.00 265.00 13,330.00 25.00 13,355.00 212.00 13,567.00 221.00 13,779.00 265.00 14,044.00 25.00 14,069.00 212.00 14,281.00 212.00 14,705.00 265.00 14,970.00 25.00 14,995.00 80.00 15,075.00 159.00 15,234.00 25.00 15,259.00 190.00 15,449.00 212.00 15,661.00 159.00 15,820.00 25.00 15,845.00 80.00' 15,925.00 212.00 16,137.00 159.00 16,296.00 25.00 16,321.00 159.00 16,480.00 212.00 16,692.00 159.00 16,851.00 25.00 16,876.00 80.00 16,956.00 159.00 17,115.00 105.00 ~17,220.00 City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program ,~,~lication Page 4 Project(s) needing funding How will your organization use any funding awarded? Give the prOject's objectives, number of persons. served, area where services are provided, and number of volunteers involved. Be specific. Note any equipment or services that the award money would purchase and why it is needed. Please include a detailed budget and a schedule of significant activities ralated to this project. Please attach a maximum of one double-spaced typewritten page of information if you need to expand your answer beyond this space. (See AttacheS) Community Service Funding Program Application Page 4 Project(s) needing funding The monies requested are to help maintain the Temecula Community Center, produce "Temecula Talks" a community service twice monthly TV program, and put on special events in the community. These projects"all reflect support for the Community Center in various ways such as use of vendors, hotels, restaurants, and support of other service organiza- tions in the community. One of the purposes of the organi- zation as set forth in our Articles of Incorporation is to ~r'ovide community services and facilities. The projects serve the residents of Temecula and surrounding areas. Attendance runs into the thousands. The project. events are held at the Northwest City .._omplex C"Temecula Show Grounds") site located on Diaz Road north of Winchester Road in Temecula with the exception of Lhe Pumpkin Run which is held in Old Town Temecula. The project will involve several hundred volunteers from throughout the community. They will be working on preparing for the events, running the events, and restoring the site after the events. The projects are not anticipated to involve the purchase of any equipment, but will require labor and material for preparation of the site. The projects will require the rental of electric generators, fork lifts, skip loaders, a temporary portable office, porta potties, power poles; -more- Application Page 4 (con't) Pg. 2 tents and sunshades. It will also involve the hiring of necessary security personnel consisting of Deputy Sheriffs and MP's from the Camp Pendelton Marine Base. The budget and significant activities related to these projects are attached. TEMECUA TOWN ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 435 Temecula. CA 92593 PROPOSED 1994 BUDGET D/O1G&A 1994 BUDGET INCOME DUES USAGE USAGE-SECURITY USAGE-CLEANING TV PROGRAM RENT MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL INCOME 6.000 30,000 4,500 2,700 5,600 6,600 1,500 54,700 EXPENSES ADV & PROMOTION AWARDS BAD DEBTS CONTINGENCIES CONTRACT SERVICES DUES & PUBLICATIONS EQUIPMENT RENTAL INSURANCE-GENERAL INSURANCE-WRKM'S COMP LEGAL & PROFESSIONAL LICENSES & PERMITS MILEAGE (REIMBURSEMENT,) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES REPAIRS & MAINTENACE RENT SCHOLARSHIPS SECURITY SUPPLIES TAXES-PAYROLL TAXES OTHER TELEPHONE TV PROGRAM UTILITIES WAGES 1,000 50 240 6,200 52,500 175 2,000 25,000 120 1,000 100 150 1,000 7,500 6,000 1,500 1,500 2,200 5,000 1,600 600 5,600 3,360 18,000 12,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 150,395 OPERATING INCOME (75,695) -more- Proposed 1994 Budget Pg. 2 OTI4ER INCOME INTEREST TOTAL OTHER INCOME OTHER EXPENSES INTEREST ALLOCRTIONS TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES NET INCOME (LOSS.) 20,000 20,000 25.000 (40.000) 15,OOO (40.695) TRACTOR RACE RODEO PUMPKIN RUN BINGO 8.050 50 1,015 44,565 53,680 IqET PROFIT 12,985 Footnotes: 1, The Temecu]a Town Association is obligated to $1,744.14 mortgage payments per month of which on].y the interest expense portion is reflected The Temecula Town Association receives First Trust Deed payments annually of $23,965.44 of which only the ]nterest income is reflected. TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 455 Temecula, CA 92595 PROPOSED 1994 BUDGET D/02 BINGO 1994 BUDGET INCOME DINGO BREAKOPENS FOOD COMMISSIONS BINGO-MISCELLANEOUS 180,000 118,000 240 1,200 TOTAL INCOME 299,440 COST OF SALES BINGO BREAKOPENS MISCELLANEOUS 6,500 900 TOTAL COST OF SALES 10,700 288,740 GROSS PROFIT EXPENSES ADVERTISING & PROMOTION BAD DEBTS BANK CHARGES MISCELLANEOUS PRINTING PRIZES-BREAKOPENS PRIZES-CASH PRIZES-NON-CASH REPAIRS'& MAINTENANCE SECURITY SET-UP' SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING INCOME 1,000 100 25 150 750 86,100 140,000 7,000 5,500 1,950 1,500 2,100 244,175 44,565 TEMECULA 'TOWN ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 435 Temecua, CA 92593 PROPOSED 1994 BUDGET D/03 TRACTOR RACE INCOME ADMISSIONS BEER/BAR CARNIVAL DRIVE ENTRIES EVENT PARKING RV PARKING GOLF TOURNAMENT SOUVENIRS," SPONSORS VENDORS CHILI COOKOFF 1994 BUDGET 60,000 24,000 2,400 3,500 2,500 1,900 6,000 5,000 21,000 15,000 1,200 TOTAL INCOME 142,500 EXPENSES ADV & PROMOTION AWARDS BLEACHES BEER/BAR COMMISSIONS-SPONSORS CONTINGENCIES DONATIONS-SERVICES ELECTRIC POWER ENTERTAINMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL GOLF TOURNAMENT LICENSES & PERMITS MEDIA DAY OFFICE RENTAL PORTA POTTIES SECURITY SIGNS SITE PREPARATIDN SOUVENIRS TELEPHONE WORK PARTIES CHILI COOKOFF 9,000 1,500 1,500 7,500 2,100 5,400 2,500 9,000 35,000 9.000 3,000 250 1,500 400 ~,000 8,500 l,O00 5,000 2,500 500 1,500 1,200 TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATIONS 110,850 23,600 OPERATING INCOME 8,050 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 455 Temecula, CA 92593 PROPOSED 1994 BUDGET D/04 RODEO 1994 BUDGET INCOME ADMISSIONS BEER/BAR SOUVENIRS SPONSORS VENDORS BUCKING CHUTE SPONSORS BUCKLE SPONSORS MISS TEMECULA RODEO POKER RIDES RIDES EQUESTRIAN EVENT TOTAL INCOME EXPENSES ADV & PROMOTION AWARDS BLEACHERS BEER/BAR COMMISSIONS-SPONSORS CONTINGENCIES ELECTRIC POWER ENTERTAINMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL LICENSES & PERMITS MISS TEMECULA RODEO OFFICE RENTAL POKER RIDE PORTA POTTIES PRCA FEES & JUDGES SECURITY SIGNS SITE PREPARATION STOCK CONTRACTOR STOCK FEED TELEPHONE RIDES WORK PARTIES TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATION 44,000 12,000 400 5,000 5,000 2,000 1,500 7,500 S,500 5,500 5,000 89,400 4,000 10,500 1,000 4,000 750 5,600 S.O00 9,000 5,000 225 4,000 200 1,500 500 1.500 5,000 200 1,500 16,100 900 200 1,500 575 74,550 ('14,800) OPERATING INCOME 50 INCOME SPONSORS VEI,IDORS ENTRIES BREAKFAST TEE SHIRTS TOTAL INCOME EXPENSES ADV & PROMOTION AWARDS BREAKFAST CONTINGENCIES SUPPLIES TEE SHIRTS TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATION OPERATING INCOME TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 435 Temecula, CA 92595 PROPOSED 1994 BUDGET O/06 PUMPKIN RUN 1994 BUDGET G,O00 200 5,200 200 500 9,100 2,000 350 575 310 250 3,000 6,485 1,600 1,015 ITEM 16 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer May 24, 1994 Review and Adoption of the Proposed Fiscal Year 1994-95 Operating Budget PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Review the proposed annual Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year 1994-95 Adopt Resolution 94---entitled: RESOLUTION 94~""~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994- 95 OPERATING BUDGET Adopt Resolution No. 94-!_ ~ntitled:. 'A RESOLUTION 'OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS DISCUSSION: Attached is the Fiscal Year 1994-95 {FY 1994-95) Operating Budget. The Budget includes revenue projections and expenditure requests for the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and Internal Service Funds. The FY 1994-95 proposed budget is a conservative, balanced budget developed in consideration of the City Council's priorities, the current state of the economy and the uncertainty of State budget action imposed on cities. Accordingly, the City Council has identified an objective of developing and maintaining a reserve for economic uncertainties of 10% or $1,233,060, in FY 1994-95. Total General Fund Fund Balance including the reserve for economic uncertainties, at June 30, 1995 is projected to be $8,974,909, which is an increase of $1 52,585 from June 30, 1994 to June 30, 1995. REVENUES City operating revenues are projected to total $13,088,343,including Gas Tax revenues. The revenue projections reflect an increase of $768,321. Significant increases in revenues are as follows: Building Permits $150,000;Sales Tax $232,000;Transient Occupancy Tax $30,000; Motor Vehicle in Lieu $52,743; and a one-time PERS payment from Riverside County Sheriff of $172,000. EXPENDITURES The proposed budget reflects a "hold the line" position in service delivery. City operating expenditures in total reflect an overall increase of 5.4%. This increase is due to cost of living adjustments of 5% passed through the police and fire contracts, as well as an increase of $250,000 for road maintenance.. In addition, the Building and Safety budget includes a full year of cost for a Permit Technician to assist in handling the increased workload as reflected by the increase in Building Permit revenues. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS The Personnel Allocation and Revised Schedule of Authorized Positions reflect a net decrease of three positions: Senior Management Analyst Planning Technician Engineering Technician City Manager's Office Planning Department Public Works Department The deleted positions are currently unfilled and it was anticipated that they would remain so indefinitely. Attachments: Proposed Fiscal Year 1994-95 Annual Operating Budget Resolution No. 94-_ to adopt Fiscal Year 1993-94 Annual Operating Budget Resolution No. 94-_ Revising the Schedule of Authorized Positions Exhibit "A" Schedule of Authorized Positions RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDUI ,F, OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS WHEREAS, pursuant.to the authority under Chapter 2.08.060 of the City's Municipal Code, the City manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt the Revised Schedule of Authorized Positions; NOW, THEI~RE, BE IT RF. BOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. The attached Schedule of Authorized Positions (Exhibit A) is hereby adopted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The Schedule of Authorized Positions shall become effective July 1, 1994, and may be thereafter amended. Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of Authorized Positions and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's personnel policies. Section 4. All prior resolutions and parts of this resolution in conffict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of May, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] r~sosXl8 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I I-IERF~Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 24th day of May, 1994, by the following vote of the Council: 0 COUNCILMF-MBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCH,MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMI~-I~fBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk POSITION TITLES Accounting Assistant Accounting Specialist Administrative Secretary Administrative Technician. Assistant City Manager Assistant Engineer Assistant Banner Associate Engineer Associate Banner Building Inspector I Building Inspector II Building Technician Chief Accountant Chief Building Official City Clerk City Engineer/Dir. of Public Works City Manager Code Enforcement Officer Councilmember Custodian Deputy City Clerk Director of Community Services Director of Banning Engineering Aide Engineering Technician Executive Assistant Finance Officer Financial Services Administrator Human Resources Administrator Information Systems Administrator Landscape Inspector Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Superintendent Maintenance Worker Management Assistant Office Assistant Office Specialist Permit Engineer Personnel Specialist Banning Technician Principal Engineer Public Works Inspector Recreation Coordinator Recreation Superintendent Recreation Supervisor Senior Accountant Senior Building Inspector Senior Management Analyst Senior Ranner Senior Public Works Inspector Traffic Engineer Traffic Technician Volunteer Coordinator TOTAL SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS MINIMUM MAXIMUM RANGE EXEMPT/ NON/EXEMPT 2.5 $1,605 $2,002 1012 NE 3 $1,920 $2,395 1028 NE 6 $1,872 $2,335 1026 NE I $1,394 $1,739 1000 NE I $5,763 $7,188 4024 E 3 $3,047 $3,800 2024 NE 2 $2,464 $3,073 2004 NE '1 $3,260 $4,066 2032 E 2 $3,047 $3,800 2024 NE I $2,237 $2,790 1044 NE 2 $2,431 $3,032 2002 NE 2 $2,193 $2,735 1042 NE 1 $3,377 $4,212 3002 E I $5,236 $6,530 4016 E I $4,355 $5,432 4000 E I $5,763 $7,188 4024 E I ****** $8,655 5000 E I $2,347 $2,927 1048 NE 5 $ 300 $ 300 6000 E 1 $1,527 $1,905 1008 NE I $2,414 $3,011 2000 E I $5,236 $6,530 4016 E I $5,236 $6,530 4016 E I $1,920 $2,395 1028 NE 2 $2,105 $2,625 1038 NE I $2,414 $3,011 2000 E I $5,236 $6,530 4016 E I $3,377 $4,212 3002 E I $3,377 $4,212 3002 E I $3,088 $3,851 2026 E 2 $2,237 $2,790 1044 NE 2 $1,926 $2,402 1030 NE 2 $3,331 $4,155 3000 E 5 $1,667 $2,079 1016 NE 1 $2,347 $2,927 1048 NE 10 $1,394 $1,739 1000 NE 2.5 $1,454 $1,813 1004 NE 1 $3,260 $4,066 2032 E 2 $1,920 $2,395 1028 NE 2 $2,193 $2,735 1042 NE 2 $4,060 $5,063 3014 E 2 $2,431 $3,032 2002 NE 2 $1,566 $1,954 1010 NE 1 $3,331 $4,155 3000 E 2 $2,019 $2,518 1034 NE I $3,047 $3,800 2024 E 1 $2,943 $3,670 2020 NE I $3,088 $3,851 2026 E 2 $3,424 $4,270 3004 E 2 $2,943 $3,670 2020 NE I $4,060 $5,063 3014 E I $2,105 $2,625 1038 NE ~ $1,454 $1,813 1004 NE 98.0 Effective July 1, 1994 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994- 95 FOR TIIE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE VARIOUS DEPARTMENT BUDGETS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final Operating Budget for fiscal year 1994-95 and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final Operating Budget, and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula enti~ed "City of Temecula 1994-95 Annual Budget," is hereby adopted. SECTION 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the u~ and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Head may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts up to $10,000 per tmn. sfer, with the approval of the City Manager. 'C. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in mounts up to $10,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $10,000 requires City Council action. D. The City Council must authorize transfers of funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers within departmental budget accounts of $10,000 or more. E. The City Council must authorize any increase in regular personnel positions above the level included in the final budget. The City Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. Resos\17 I F. Notwithstanding Section 2C, pursuant to Section 3.13.080 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts appwved by the Council in amounts up to pwject contingency established by the Council. SECTION 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the City books at June 30, 1994, are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for 1994-95. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVEB AND ADOFrED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 24th day of May, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATrF. ST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] R*-sos\17 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-~]~l~.IIy DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of May 1994 by the following roll call vote. 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCILMF~MBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk Resos\17 3 ITEM 17 APPROVAL CZ'~Z' P, cl'Z'O~ FINANCE OFFICER Cl'~'~ MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk May 24, 1994 Community Services Commission Appointment RECOMMENDATION: Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint one applicant to fill an unexpired term on the Temecula Community Services Commission caused by the resignation of Commissioner Evelyn Harker. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Council's adopted policy and procedure for making appointments and re-appointments, the commission vacancy which has a term that expires October 2, 1994, was advertised in two local newspapers of general circulation. The applications received were forwarded to the President and Vice President of the Temecula Community Services District for review. Councilmember Birdsall and Mayor Pro Tem Stone have recommended the appointment of Sam D. Kennedy, who currently lives in the City in an apartment. Unfortunately, his new home, which he plans to occupy in August, is being built outside the City limits on Calle Campo. At that time, pursuant to Section 2.40.030 of the Municipal Code he would not meet the qualification that members of commissions of the city shall, at all times during their incumbencies, be bona fide residents and registered voters of the city. Mayor Pro Tem Stone has indicated that he also would favor the appointment of Rich Soltysiak. Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of May 2, 1994. ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment R:~Agemla.rpt%CS-Cmvwn./vpt I COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT HOME PHONE: OCCUPATION: NAME: Rich Soltysiak YEARS RESIDENT ADDRESS: 30519 Wailea Court OF TEMECULA: 676-1470 ' . _-. - - ',WORK PHONE: 676-1470 Civil Engineering.,Consultant, Seven EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: · Self-employed.~.~i: ": -'" "" :' :-"':: .... :" EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUNDIDE~REES: BS/CE Marquette University; ' Mi'lwaukee',' 'Wisconsin - 1979 Registered Civil,Engineer.,..State-of California -_ 1983 .. LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COU~Y OR OTHER CITY COMMi~EE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YBR OF SERVICE: .' :~ ~:/,~'~-:~:+-~ -' Temecula and Murrieta Coordinating';'C'6~it~ee since 1991 D~SIRE rIO S]~.~'~ ON CO~,~INTTY S'Ia~RV'I'C~ COMMTS,STON I consider myself fortunate to have lived and worked in the Temecula area since 1986. During this period the community has seen a transition from CSA 143 to the CSD. Our public recreation amenities have grown from the limitation of the Sports Park to ample play fields and the wonderful recreation center. Along with the park amenities, the CSD has also assumed responsibility for maintaining common areas previously maintained by CSA 143 together with the fiscal responsibilities of funding maintenance and operation. My family and myself actively participate in recreation activities' ranging from men's softball to CSD programs to utilizing sports fields in TVSA soccer and TVLL baseball. I believe I can contribute to the commission from both an informed young family perspective and an informed technical perspective. Serving on the CSD commission allows me to contribute back to the community. OUALIFICATIONSTO S~RVE ON CO!~EFNTTY ~Rq~VTC~ COMB~TSSTON My professional background, centered around civil engineering, ranges from experience as a County Civil Engineer, to Director of Engineering in a consulting firm, to Project Manager in a land development company. Currently I am the sole proprietor of my own consulting firm. Currently I am providing construction management services and project coordination services On the Rancon Business Center/CFD 89-5. $ 1,000,000 in City of Murrieta CSD landscaping has been installed underbudget to date as part of the project. I have been responsible for services ranging from providing maintenance budgets to easement deeds with the CSD. Commission and Old Town Advisory Commzsszon applz · encouraging to seethe Council express a desire to seek fresh ideas and perspectives from new faces. It is with that spirit I submitShis application for consideration and have expressed recent interest in the various city commission vacancies. I believe I can make a positive contribution to the community and also provide representation of the young families in the community. CITY OF TEMECULA ~ '°' "' APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMIS~ByNi"~P"* G 2 :~'~, ..~ Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: ADDRESS: HOME PHO~ WORK PHONE: . ~) (~c/~ ~-~ 3 /,,,~ -, . LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COU~ OR OTHER C~Y COMMI~EE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE. SERVED AND THE Y~R OF SERVICE:-/, -. '~ .~ .: ,.~. _.. . _ . -:' ~"~7~~%~'C~ ~~": ~..r~,~~~T~r~ ..,sFLY STATe W.Y YOU W,S. TO SBVS On T.,S COMM,SS,O..' AnD BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use addMonal papei ' '- P~SE NO~: Appli~ons wgl be kept on ~e ~r ¢~side~n ~ ~re Ream to: C~ Qe~'s Office, 43174 Busira Park Drive, Te~cula, ~ 9~90 '(714) 6~9~ -" ' ~ " · · - ..... ' .... -'~':;?~ ':' ~ -'~ .' ""' ~ ~:., ,~. --..~ ~-:-.~ '-~ ~.~- ~:~ , ' ',i' '* : --. : -. - ' .... .... - . _. CURTIS STEPHAN 41990 AVENI DA VISTA LADERA TEMECULA, CA. 92591 (909) 699~5813 CURRENT ASSIGNMENT: CITY OF ESCONDIDO 201 NORTH BROADWAY ESCONDIDO, CA. 92025 (619) 741~1869 RISK MANAGER MARCH 1990 TO PRESENT JOB SUMMARY: MANAGEMENT OF THE CITY'S WORKERS COMPENSATION, PROPERTY/CASUALTY, EMPLOYEE BENEFIT, RETIREMENT AND SAFETY PROGRAMS. PLAN AND DEVELOP RISK FINANCING/CONTROL ALTERNATIVES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE THE ADVERSE EFFECTS OF ACCIDENTAL LOSS TO THE CITY AT THE LOWEST POSSIBLE COST. RESPONSIBILITIES: DETERMINE FUNDING AND BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS. REVIEW CONTRACTS TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY CLAUSES. INDENTIFY AND ANALYZE LOSS EXPOSURES, AND DESIGN PROGRAMS THAT WILL REDUCE THEIR FREQUENCY AND SEVERITY. KNOWLEDGE: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF RISK MANAGEMENT, FINANCE, BUDGETING, AND ACCOUNTING, EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES, CITY OPERATIONS, INSURANCE COVERAGES, AND LEGAL PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE: SEPTEMBER 1986 TO MARCH 1990 RISK MANAGER, ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FEBRUARY 1982 TO SEPTEMBER 1986 RISK MANAGER. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT SEPTEMBER 1977 TO FEBRUARY 1982 .. CLAIMS SUPERVISOR ROYAL GLOBE/THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANIES EDUCATION: CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY - SAN FRANCISCO BACHELOR OF ARTS - BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SPECIALIZED TRAINING: ASSOCIATE IN RISK MANAGEMENT, ARM PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS: BOARD MEMBER - CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF PRIMA PAST PRESIDENT - CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF RIMS CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: ('~ ADDRESS:/_.,/ HOME PHONE: ddPR 2 9 YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: WORK PHONE: EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEG~R ES: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: ' ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical,._community, service): ......... BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS" COMMISSION, AND-WHY-:YOU I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified,. I consent to the release of this '_::::7.:-:L~L.'._..: ... PLEASE NOTE: Applications wal be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies, '>- :: '.- ~ :~:::' :~-";-: ';7."' Raturn to: City Clerk'e Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989':.:':.!'::' : .... , --. ..: ;.- ..... ..... .;. -..,--. . CITY OF TEMECULA il~ APR APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISS Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: HOME PHONE: ?'o f,- 6'~f;" -.(7 7 5 OCCUPATION: YEARS RESIDENT qo~. ';7' ,4'- .... I understand that my or all information on this form may be verified...I consent to the release of this Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Par Temecula, CA 82390 (714l 694-.1989 ,._ . .... ...;.- .... ~ ....... LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:- ' ' "'< "' :' ' ..... ......... . . '~ ,:: ............... : ................... · .; ..... ~.j...~ ,~.~ .... - ..,,.,:. ~ . ~ ....... . _-~.._.... - . _ . ..... . : ;; ?'-:'-:..2 ... .... . ..... -.:~,;~. . ?.o., ..:.: i.. . .,/a ~ ~. _- ,,,, : ...... ~:::.,.: .....~ ~: , . "::t.. ......' -,~:':'; --,:.: ....-: :2. :::-'.t-4:.~:'z';~c':":t: :.._ BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU ·WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, : AND WHY..YOU ';7~'7~:i".;:-~-''' ITEM NO. 18 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Attorney May 24, 1994 CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) - Construction of Storm Drain on the South Side of Solana Way from Ynez Road to Westerly of Margarita Road RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider directing Staff to prepare and authorize the Mayor to execute an Amendment to the Joint Financing Agreement for CFD 88-12, providing for CFD financing and construction of a 78" Storm Drain on the South side of Solana Way from Ynez Road to Westerly of Margarita Road. BACKGROUND: Prior to City incorporation, the County initiated CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor). At that time, the County did so with the understanding that it would commit a portion of the sales tax revenue generated within the CFD to be used to reimburse the property owners for the debt service on the Bonds to be sold to finance the' improvements. Shortly after incorporation, the City Council considered whether to continue the County's policy. On March 20, 1990, the City Council adopted Resolution 90-30 specifying the terms and conditions under which the City would provide sales tax reimbursement. Resolution 90-30 specified that sales tax reimbursement would be available only for public facilities of a regional character. Those facilities were as follows: 1. Construction of the Overland Bridge across Interstate 15. 2. Widening Ynez Road to six lanes. 3. Park facilities ($2,000,000.00). R:~agende.rpt\OES-llo 1 Agenda Repo~ CFD 88-12 SolanaWay Storm Drain Page 2. 4. Acquisition of improvements to Solana Way and Ynez Road from Jack Raymond. Construction of freeway loop ramps at the southeast quadrant of Rancho California Road and Interstate 15, and at the southeast quadrant of Winchester Road and Interstate 15. At the same time, the Council indicated that it would not use sales tax to reimburse property owners for work that would have been a typical condition of development. Consequently, while CFD 88-12 will construct six lanes along Ynez Road, sales tax will not reimburse the property owners abutting Ynez Road for the cost of constructing two lanes of Ynez Road. In other words, Resolution 90-30 treated four of the six lanes of Ynez Road as a regional improvement and two of the six lanes as a developer obligation. In 1992, CFD 88-12 sold Bonds to finance Ynez Road, the park improvements, the Raymond acquisition, and the Overland and I-15 design work. However, because construction of Solana Way was not included in Resolution 90-30, no provision was made to use the Bonds for widening Solana Way. However, the original Public Report for CFD 88-12 did authorize use of Bond proceeds for widening Solana Way. Consequently, it was possible to amend the Bond documents to permit use of the Bond proceeds for widening Solana Way. At its March 1, 1994 meeting, the City Council approved two agreements authorizing widening Solana Way from Motorcar Parkway to Margarita Road. The first Agreement permitted use of the proceeds of CFD's Series 1992 Bonds for the road widening. The second Agreement provided that the City would not use sales tax to reimburse the property owners abutting Solana Way that portion of the debt service on the Bonds associated with the road widening. Construction is now on hold pending the signing of the second Agreement. There are two property owners abutting the Solana Way widening: Eli Lilly &-Company and Rancho Mobilehome Estates (Gordon Scott). It is our understanding that Lilly will sign the Sales Tax Reimbursement Agreement. However, Gordon Scott refuses to sign unless the City also agrees to construct a 78" storm drain across his property. Presently, his property serves as a retention basin for these storm waters and cannot be fully developed without either the storm drain or a similar improvement being constructed. The estimated cost of the storm drain is $300,000. Engineering Staff considers the storm drain a regional improvement within the CFD Boundaries, however the primary beneficiary will be Mr. Scott's property. Sufficient funds exist in the Bond proceeds to finance such a storm drain. The County would likely be willing to permit Bond proceeds to be used for the storm drain, assuming the documents originally forming the CFD include the storm drain. (City Staff is presently reviewing this issue with County Staff.) R:~agende.rpt\OES-Reee 2 Agenda Report CFD 88-12 Solana Way Storm Drain Page 3. At issue is whether the Council wishes to authorize use of CFD Bond proceeds for the storm drain and whether it is willing to provide a sales tax reimbursement for the debt service associated with the work. Use of Bond proceeds for this storm drain would require a change in prior Council policy from Resolution No. 90-30. The City Council has four options concerning how to proceed: Construct the 78" storm drain with Bond proceeds and provide sales tax reimbursement for the debt service associated with the storm drain. Construct the 78" storm drain with Bond proceeds but do not provide sales tax reimbursement for the debt service associated with the storm drain. Choose not to construct the 78" storm drain with Bond proceeds. If Mr. Scott still chooses not to sign the Sales Tax Reimbursement Agreement for Solana Way, then the Council may consider proceeding with Solana Way without the Sales Tax Agreement. This would mean that sales tax would be used to reimburse Mr. Scott for debt service associated with the Solana Way widening. Choose not to construct the 78" storm drain with Bond proceeds. If Mr. Scott will not agree to bear responsibility for the debt service associated with the Solana Way widening, the Council may choose not to widen Solana Way. FISCAL IMPACT: Future sales tax revenues sufficient to meet the debt service on $300,000 of Bond proceeds. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 90-30. R:~eOend/.rpt~OES-Re~o 3 RESOLUTION 90-30 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING ITS INTENTION TO ASSIST WITH THE FINANCING OF ROAD AND TRAFFIC AND PARK FACILITIES OF REGIONAL BENEFIT WITHIN THE CITY BY MAKING CERTAIN SALES TAX REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE ON BONDS OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88- 12 (YNEZ CORRIDOR) OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE WHICH MAY BE ISSUED TO FINANCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH FACILITIES WHEREAS, The County of Riverside (the "County") prior to incorporation, has conducted proceedings pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Chapter 2.5 (commencing with § 53311) of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (the "Mello-Roos Act"), for the establishment of Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) of the County of Riverside, State of California (the 1 "District"), the authorization of a bonded indebtedness for the District in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $60,000,000, and the levy of special taxes on parcels of taxable property therein to pay the principal of and interest on bonds which may be issued to represent such bonded indebtedness and to finance the design and construction of certain public facilities; and WHEREAS, all proceedings pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act with respect to the establishment of the District, the authorization of the bonded indebtedness therefore and the levy of special taxes on taxable property therein to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds thereof have been completed except the elections pursuant to Sections 53326 and 53351 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, among the public facilities which are proposed to be financed with the proceeds of the bonds of the District are the construction and widening of Ynez Road to a six (6) lane width from the north property line of the property where the Advanced Cardiovascular Systems building is located southerly to its intersection with Rancho California Road, the construction of the Apricot Street over-crossing of Interstate Highway 15, the addition of loop- ramps at the entrances of Rancho California Road and Winchester Road to Interstate Highway 15, and the acquisition of land for the future development of regional and local parks, and the acquisition of all or a portion of Solano Way, a portion of Ynez Road at its intersection with Solano Way and all or a portion of certain water, sewer, and storm drain improvements located therein, all of which will be of general benefit to residents throughout the City of Temecula (the "City") and the surrounding area and which facilities are not private projects but those required by the City and the County (the "Public Facilities"); and WHEREAS, the territory within the District is located entirely within the City and will be developed for commercial, industrial and residential uses which will provide significant sales and use tax revenues to the City; and 3 XResos\90-30 0 1 \24\9 14:37pro Resolution No. 90-30 Page 2 WHEREAS, prior to the incorporation, the Board of Supervisors of the County, as an inducement to the owners of the property within the boundaries of the District to proceed with the financing of the construction of the Public Facilities and the development of their property to provide such sales and use tax revenues agreed with the owners of property within the District to annually appropriate and make available for the payment of principal of and interest on the bonds of the District a portion of the sales and use tax revenues received by the County from businesses and industries located within the.District; and WHEREAS, now that the City has become incorporated, the County will not receive any sales and use tax revenues from businesses and industries located within the District, and all such revenues will be received by the City; and WHEREAS, the owners of the property within the District have requested of the City that the City enter into an agreement with them whereby the City will make sales and use tax revenues received by the City from businesses and industries located within the District available for the payment of the principal of and interest on the bonds of the District which may be issued and sold to finance the construction and acquisition of the Public Facilities; and WHEREAS, in order to induce such owners and their successors and assigns (hereafter the "owners of property") to proceed with the elections to be conducted by the County authorizing bonded indebtedness for the District and the levy of special taxes on taxable property therein to pay the principal of and interest on bonds which may be issued and sold to represent such bonded indebtedness and to finance the Public Facilities, it is desirable that the City enter into such an agreement with the County and with owners of the property within the District; and WHEREAS, the City also requires certain agreements from the County and the owners of property within the District in order to make such sales and use tax revenues available for the Public Facilities while assuring that funds will be available for other road projects of benefit to City residents and the City may determine not to finalize an agreement which does not contain corresponding agreemdnts of the County and the owners of property as set out in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, since it is not possible for the City, the County and such owners to negotiate the final terms and conditions of such an agreement and to have such an agreement approved, authorized and executed on behalf of the City and the County an all such owners prior to the last date upon which such elections can be held pursuant to Section 53326 of the Government Code, it is necessary and desirable that the City Council adopt a resolution with regard to its intention to enter into such an agreement and to make a portion of the sales and use tax revenues received by the City from businesses and industries located within the District available to the County for the payment of the principal of and interest on the bonds of the District which may be issued and sold to finance the Public Facilities and specifying the general terms and conditions of such an agreement; and 3',R,'~os\90-30 01\24\91 4:37pm Resolution No. 90-30 Page 3 WHEREAS, the City may request that the County limit the amount of bonds to be authorized in such elections and issued to that necessary to fund the Public Facilities and expenses incidental thereto; and WHEREAS, since additional road and traffic facilities including, but not limited to; the Public Facilities also are of benefit to property owners and residents of the City, it is also equitable and desirable that the City Council proceed with the establishment of an impact fee program, including but not limited to, the formation of a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District(s) pursuant to Section 66484 of the Government Code, including the property within the District, and levy a fee as a condition to the issuance of building permits to provide another source of revenue to finance the construction and acquisition of, or to reimburse the District for such roads, bridges and traffic facilities, throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the owners of property within the District will be required to pay such fees upon issuance of building permits and notwithstanding any prior agreement with the County, to waive their rights to protest to the formation of such an impact fee district and the levy and collection of a fee therein (reserving their rights to object to the method of allocation of costs or fee apportionment); and WHEREAS, as a portion of the Public Facilities to be financed are of local rather than regional benefit, the owners of property within the District will be required to reimburse the City, for the cost of such Public Facilities they otherwise would be required to build with their own funds; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the costs of utility relocation for construction of the Public Facilities will be borne by the affected utilities, but, in the event all or a portion of such costs are not borne by the utilities, the City and owners of property shall divide such costs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct. SECTION 2 Agreement by City. It is the intention of the City Council to negotiate the terms and conditions of and to approve and authorize the execution and delivery on behalf of the City of an agreement to be entered into between the City, the County and all owners of property within the District (the "Agreement") which, with regard to sales and use tax revenues, will in general provide as follows: (a) When and if bonds of the District are authorized and issued by the County in an amount sufficient to finance the Public Facilities (plus incidental expenses), the City Council will develop a system to annually appropriate and made a available for the payment of 3~,Resos\90-30 01124\91 4:37pm Resolution No. 90-30 Page 4 Co) (C) (d) (e) the principal of and interest on such bonds an amount equal to 25 percent of the sales and use tax revenues received for each fiscal year by the City from business and industries located within the District. The City Council shall appropriate such sales and use tax revenues each year of the term of the bonds, commencing with the first year in which special taxes are levied on parcels of taxable property in the District for the payment of interest or principal on the bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Council has the absolute authority in any fiscal year to determine not to make such an appropriation and the failure or refusal of the City to make such an appropriation shall not be determined to be a breach of any agreement. No part of the sales and use tax revenues received by the City in any fiscal year shall be appropriated, made available or used for the payment of principal of and interest on the bonds of the District which are issued and sold to finance any public facilities other than the Public Facilities. For each fiscal year when sales and use tax revenues have been appropriated by the City Council, such revenues shall be allocated for the payment of special taxes as follows: (1) Up to 25 percent of the sales and use tax revenues received during each fiscal year with respect to each parcel of developed property (a parcel with a commercial or industrial business located thereon and with curb and gutter adjacent thereto) shall be allocated proportionately to the payment of the special taxes levied on all parcels of developed property for that fiscal year. To the extend that the amount of the special taxes levied on such parcels exceeds the amount of sales and use tax revenues available to pay the special taxes, the property owners shall pay the additional amount of any special taxes owing (the "shortfall"). (2) In the event the amount of the sales and use tax revenues available to be appropriated in any fiscal year with respect to parcels of developed property is in excess of the special taxes levied on such parcels for that fiscal year, that excess shall be allocated proportionately to pay or reduce all or a 3XResos',90-30 01~.4\91 4:37pm Resolution No. 90-30 Page 5 SECTION 3 portion of the special taxes levied on parcels of undeveloped property in the District. To the extent that the amount of the special taxes exceed the amount of sales and use tax revenues available to pay the special taxes, the property owner shall pay such amount. (3) It is contemplated that in the later years of the agreement the 25 percent of sales tax revenues appropriated annually for the payment of principal and interest on the bonds of the District may exceed the amount of the special taxes levied on parcels of both developed and undeveloped property. In the event of such an excess in any future years the City shall appropriate and make available such excess first to reimburse each owner developed property pro rata for the shortfall pursuant to subsection 1 hereof, and then to the extent any excess remains to reimburse each owner of undeveloped property or developed property pro rata for special taxes paid pursuant to Subsection 2. Such reimbursement shall be made without interest and shall be credited first to the earliest fiscal year in which special taxes were levied. In the event that there is no such excess in any fiscal year, the City shall be under no obligation to make such reimbursement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Council shall have the absolute authority in any fiscal year to determine whether of not to make this appropriation and has no obligation to make any contribution or reimbursement from any other funds of the City. Traffic Impact Fees. The City Council intends to initiate, conduct and complete proceedings to form a district and levy and collect traffic impact. fees, as allowed by law, including, but not limited to those authorized pursuant to Section 66484 of the Government Code, to be paid by the owners of property within the area of benefit as a condition to the issuance of building permits to finance the design and construction (or reimbursement to the District therefor) of road, bridges and other traffic facilities which are of benefit throughout the City (the "Traffic Impact Fee") specifically including, but not limited to, the cost of construction of the fifth and sixth lanes of Ynez Road. (a) The Agreement shall provide that the owners of property within the District, notwithstanding any prior agreement with the County, shall pay such a Traffic Impact Fee as determined by the City upon the issuance of building permits. 3~Resos\90-30 0144\91 4:37pm Resolution No. 90-30 Page 6 (C) SECTION 4 The owners of property within the District also shall agree to consent to the formation of a district for, and the levy and collection of, a Traffic Impact Fee therein, and shall waive their rights to protest such formation, levy or collection, but not to object to the method of allocation of costs or fee apportionment. The City Council may but in no manner is required to elect in any fiscal year, and the agreement provided for in Section 2 hereof shall so provide, to pay all or any portion of the special taxes levied on parcels of taxable property in the District for the payment of the principal of and interest on the bonds thereof, which would otherwise be paid with sales and use tax revenues appropriated by the City Council, with revenues of the Traffic Impact Fees or other available funds, but the general revenues or full faith and credit of the City shall not be pledged for such payment. Facilities to be Financed. The Agreement shall provide that the facilities which shall be financed with the proceeds of any bonds of the District authorized, issued and sold shall include the following facilities which are the Public Facilities, and any and all costs incidental thereto, but in no event shall the City be obligated or required in any way to contribute sales and use tax revenues for the payment of principal and interest on bonds of the District issued and sold to finance other facilities. (a) Construction of the Apricot Street over-crossing of Interstate Highway 15 from Ynez Road to Jefferson Avenue, including the acquisition of the fight-of-way required on both sides of Interstate Highway 15, at an estimated cost of $5,000,000; (b) (C) The widening of Ynez Road to a six (6) lane width with turning pockets at various intersections commencing from the north property line of the property upon which the Advanced Cardiovascular System plant is located southerly to its intersection with Rancho California Road, including the acquisition of fight-of- way, utility relocations, and utility crossings (i.e., storm sewers, sanitary sewers, water mains, gas mains, electrical facilities, traffic signal facilities relocation, telephone and cable television facilities, etc), at an estimated cost of $3,000,000; The construction of the freeway loop-ramp at the southeast quadrant of the entrance of Rancho California Road to Interstate Highway 15, including the acquisition of the required right-of-way, at an estimated cost of $1,000,000; 3XResos\90-30 01\24\91 4:37pm Resolution No. 90-30 Page 7 (d) The construction of the freeway loop-ramp at the southeast quadrant of the entrance of Winchester Road to Interstate Highway 15, including the acquisition of the required right-of-way, at an estimated cost of $1,000,000; (e) The acquisition of park land and/or the construction of facilities, buildings, and equipment for local and regional park and recreational purposes, at an estimated cost of $2,000,000; and (0 The acquisition of all or a portion of Solano Way and a portion of Ynez Road at their intersection and certain water and sewer system and storm drainage facilities in Solano Way and Ynez Road near said intersection, including the acquisition of right-of-way therefor, which have been constructed to support the auto park located at such intersection. SECTION 5 Sale of Bonds. With respect to the bonds of the District to be issued and sold by the County, the Agreement shall provide as follows: (a) The bonds shall be sold in two or more; the first of which shall be sold as soon as possible in an aggregate principal amount to finance the design, construction and/or acquisition of the Public Facilities described in Section 3(b) and (0 hereof and any and all costs incidental thereto, and the second or later series of which shall be sold as soon as possible after Cai Trans permits have been obtained for the Public Facilities described in Section 3(a), (c), (d) and (e), which series shall be in an aggregate principal amount sufficient to finance the design acquisition and/or construction of such Public Facilities and any costs incidental thereto; Co) The aggregate principal amount of the any series of the bonds issued and sold to finance the Public Facilities shall include a reserve fund in such amount as is reasonably required, issuance costs, underwriter's discount, and capitalized interest for not more than eighteen months as well as the costs of administration of the District and of the Agreement contemplated by this Resolution; (C) The aggregate principal amount of the any series of the bonds issued and sold to finance the Public Facilities shall also include an amount sufficient to reimburse the owners of property within the District for any amounts which they have advanced to the County for the payment of costs and expenses incurred by the County in connection with the establishment of the District and the issuance and sale of that series of bonds; 3~x~'es°s\90'30 01\24\91 4:37pm Resolution No. 90-30 Page 8 (d) SECTION 6 SECTION 7 The aggregate principal amount of the any series of the bonds to be issued and sold to finance the Public Facilities shall be determined by the County in consultation with its bond counsel and financial consultant, the underwriter, the owners of property within the District and the City; and (e) Any series of the bonds .to be issued and sold to finance the Public Facilities shall Contain a provision which will permit their call and redemption at the earliest practical date, as determined by the County in consultation with its bond counsel and financial consultant and the underwriter. Conditions Precedent. (a) The City shall not be obligated to enter into an Agreement with the County and the owners of property within the District as contemplated in this Resolution, unless two-thirds of the votes cast in the elections within and for the District on the proposition of the District incurring a bonded indebtedness and the proposition of the levy of special taxes on parcels of taxable property therein to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds of the District which may be issued and sold to represent such bonded indebtedness and to finance the design and construction of the Public Facilities are in favor of such propositions, and the County is hereby authorized to provide for the issuance and sale of the bonds of the District in an amount sufficient to finance the design and construction of the Traffic Facilities and to levy special taxes on all parcels of taxable property within the District in an aggregate amount sufficient to pay the principal of an interest on such bonds of the District. Co) Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provisions of this Resolution in the event the County or owners of property fall or refuse to consent to the agreements required in this Resolution or other consideration acceptable to the City, the City shall not be obligated or required to enter into any agreement for the contribution of sales and use tax revenues. Agreement and Cooperation of Owners. In addition to the agreements set out in Section 2 and 3 hereof, the Agreement contemplated by this Resolution shall further provide that: (a) The owners of property in the District agree that they will execute and deposit with City, as an attachment to. the Agreement contemplated by this Resolution, an irrevocable offer to dedicate 3~Resos\90-30 01\24~91 4:37pm Resolution No. 90-30 Page 9 (b) SECTION 8 SECTION 9 the land necessary to widen Ynez Road as set out in Section 3 hereof; and The owners of undeveloped property further agree that the issuance of building permits for their projects with frontage on Ynez Road or Solano Way, or the intersection of Solano Way and Ynez Road shall be conditioned on repayment to City of the costs of construction of two lanes of Ynez Road and two lanes of Solano Way plus curb, gutter, sidewalk and parkway and two-thirds of the cost of any utility relocation not borne by the utility. The precise allocation of such repayment shall be determined pursuant to a formula to be developed by the City Engineer. In addition, the City may place a contingent assessment for such costs on the undeveloped property. Property Acquisition. The Agreement contemplated by this Resolution shall provide that to the extent property for the Public Facilities has not been required to be dedicated by and therefore must be acquired from the owners of property within the District, the date of valuation for such property shall be the date of adoption of this Resolution. Certification.The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1990. ATTEST: Ron Parks Mayor Depf~-y City Clerk [SEAL] 3XResos\90-30 01~.4\91 4:37pm Resolution No. 90-30 Page 10 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of March, 1990 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Munoz, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (-Y6ne S. Greek Deputy City Clerk 3~Resos\90-30 01\24\91 4:37pm ITEM NO. 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Harwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Manager~ May 24, 1994 Consideration of Ordinance Regulating Taxi Cab Service RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- 19.2 19.3 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 12.08 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXI CABS Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 12.08 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXI CABS Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXI CABS BACKGROUND: Several taxi cab companies have been conducting business within the City of Temecula. The City has issued business licenses unaware that a municipal ordinance regulating taxi cab services was required by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). Without a municipal ordinance in place taxi cab services must operate as chartered carriers under permit of the PUC. The PUC has informed all businesses operating taxi cabs within the City of Temecula that they must cease and desist operations until the City adopts an ordinance or until the operators obtain permits from the PUC. Staff has received several calls from business operators expressing the urgent nature of the situation. Additionally, taxi cabs cannot pick up passengers within the City until an ordinance is adopted. Because of the impact to the public and business operators. Staff is preparing an urgency ordinance and a resolution establishing fees for Council consideration. Staff will finalize a more detailed report on this item and forward it to you along with the urgency ordinance and resolution under separate cover. DEPARTMENTAL 'REPORTS CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROV~ CITY A'I'rORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official ~ May 24, 1994 Building and Safety April 1994, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for April 1994: Building Permits Issued ............................................. 246 Building Valuation ......................................... $12,889,552 Revenue Collected . .. .............. ' ....' ..................... $130,476.06 Housing Starts ................................................... 119 New Commercial Starts(Modular Buildings) .................... 2 = 3,370 Sq. Ft. Commercial Additions/Alterations .......................... 8 = 6,117 Sq. Ft. Building Inspections ............................................. 2,870 V:\TONY~REPORTS~APRIL94.RPT Agenda Report May 24, 1994 Page 2 Code Enforcement Actions .......................................... 254 Active Cases Pending .............................................. 161 Closed Cases .................................................... 88 V:%TONY\REPORTS%APl~IL94.RPT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER /~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, DirectOr of Plannin May 24, 1994 Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Planning Department's caseload and project activity for the month of March 1994: Caseload Activity: The Department received 7 applications for administrative cases and 4 for public hearing cases for the month of April as follows: Minor Change - Parcel Map Minor Public Use Permit Revised Permit w/Hearing 1 2 1 Total 4 Ongoing Projects: Old Town Specific Plan: The initial implementation program for the plan. Staff has contacted the Council to see if they are interested in participating in the selection process. Old Town RedeveloDment Project: Staff continues to meet with Zev Buffman to identify the scope, scale and approval mechanism for the project. Task Force meetings were held on April 14th and May 3rd. The next meeting will be May 23rd. Development Code: Four industrial area workshops have been scheduled for the Community Recreation Center in the morning and afternoon of May 23 and 24. The Development Code Advisory Committee met on May 9th and is scheduled to conclude it's review of the draft code on June 2th, 1994. R:~MONTHLY.RPT~I 994~FEB 511 7/94 vgw 1 French Valley AirDort: The City Council and Planning Commission reviewed the ALUC's preferred alternatives on April 17, 1994. Temecula Regional Center SDecific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: This Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission hearing on May 4, 1992 where the Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. The Specific Plan was scheduled for a Planning Commission Hearing on March 21, 1994 for direction and was continued to May 23, 1994. Environmental Impact Report 340 prepared for the Temecula Regional Center was approved by the Planning Commission on June 21, 1993 and certified by the City Council on July 13, 1993. Winchester Hills and CamDos Verdes Soecific Plans and Environmental Impact Reoorts: These Specific Plans were discussed at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4, 1992 where the Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Campos Verdes EIR went to State Clearinghouse July 10, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans went to the DRC meetings on January 5, 1993. Campos Verdes Specific Plan was scheduled for a March 21,1994 Planning Commission Hearing for direction and was continued to May 23, 1994. Murdv Ranch Soecific Plan and Environmental Imoact RePort: This Specific Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6, 1992. The Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific Plan. This Specific Plan will be scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion Management Plan. An addendum to the EIR is currently being reviewed by staff. Johnson Ranch Soecific Plan: The Specific Plan has been to a Development Review Committee meeting and is currently being amended to incorporate staff's comments. The EIR has been submitted and is being reviewed by staff. A workshop was held at the Planning Commission on April 25, 1994, where the Commission provided directions to the applicant. Attachments: 1. Revenue and Status Report - page 3 R:\MONTHLY.RPT~I 994~FEB 5117/94 vgw 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REVENUE STATUS REPORT R:\MONTHLY .RPT~1994'~FEB 511 7/94 vow 3 REVP/JuN2 05 ~ 001 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4111 4112 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 412' 4123 4124 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4132 4133 4134 4135 4136 4137 4138 4139 4140 4141 4142 4143 4144 4145 4146 16:26:00 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION AMENDED FINAL NAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIME SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS MULTI'FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL NAPS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MINOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS) RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION NAPS REVERSiON TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER SECONO UNiT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADJUSTMENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORNANCE TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT GEOLOGY CEQA GEOLOGY ORO. 547 AP[ LAFCO PARCEL NAP/WAIVER MERGER AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR. NAP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION CONDO TRACT NAP REVERSiON TO ACREAGE LOT REVISiON AFTER CHECK LOT LiNE ADJUST. PLAN CHECK CERT. OF CORRECT. PLAN CHECK CERT. OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK COND. CERT. OF CONPL. PLN. CK. CERT. OF PAR. MERGER PLAN CK CITY OF TENECtJLA REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1994 ADJUSTED ESTINATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 150,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 APRIL REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 235.00 634.00- 459.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 352.00 1,180.00 590.00 .00 .00 713.00 30.00 .00 .00 .00 607.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1993-94 REVENUE .00 975.00 1,072.13- 2,577.00 18,466.00 .00 6,490.29 1,866.00 459.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 260.00 4,715.75 10,575.00 .00 .00 8,818.75 4,887.00 2,043.00 500.00 29,525.00 4,887.00 612.00 .00 571.00 18.00 6,236.71 10,402.00 4,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 PAGE BALANCE .00 975.00- 1,072.13 2,5Tr.00- 18,466,00- .00 6,490.29- 1,866.00- 459.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 260.00- 4,715.75- 10,575.00- .00 .00 141,181.25 4,887.00- 2,043.00- 500.00- 29,525.00- 4,887.00- 612.00- .00 571.00- 18.00- 6,236.71- 10,402.00- 4,000.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 COL 5.9 tlrtt REVPR I N2 05/05/94 001 161 ACCOUNT # 4147 4148 4149 4150 4151 4152 4153 4154 4155 4156 4157 4169 4175 4180 4200 4206 4226 4260 4261 4262 4369 4370 16:26:00 GENERAL FUND PLANN I NG DESCR I PT I ON VACATIONS PLAN CK DOCUNENT PROCESSING CONDENNATION PLAN CHECK REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK PARCEL NAP PLAN CHECK TRACT NAP PLAN CHECK AllENDED NAP PLAN CHECK 4TH & SUBS. $URNITTALS FENA STUDY REVIEW LONA REV]EU DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEg INPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE K-RAT STUOY FEES FAST TRACK PLANNING FORHA FAST TRACK IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATION FEES TENPORARY USE PERNIT ACCESSORY WIND ENERGY LARGE FAN]LY DAY CARE HAZARDOUS gASTE FACILITY LAND DIV UNIT NAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK CITY OF TENEOULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL ADJUSTED ESTINATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 APRIL REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 990.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 187.00 1,730.00 1993-94 REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,000,00 .00 5,410.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 748.00 11,675.00 8ALANCE .00 .00 .00 .00. .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,000.00- .00 5,410.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .r 748.L 11,675.00- COL PLANNING 150,000.00 6,439.00 140,&45.37 9,354.63 93.8 REPT155 COUNT & VALUATION SUNNARY BY TYPE PAGE 1 05/11/94 08:56 Subtotat: Cnstr Type Dat ge 1 04/01/94 Thru 04/30/94 APRIL 1994 Date Type: 1 Ty~. ~Setect ):PLAN A/P/D Type Construction type Count $q Feet VaLuation Fees Paid A PLANNING CASE-1994 PHASING NAP-LND DIV UNT LOT LINE ADJUSTNENT NINOR CHANGE-PARCEL NAP NINOR EVENT - NON PROFIT NINON PUBLIC USE PERNIT PLOT PLAN ADNINISTRAT]VE REVISED PERHIT W/HEARING SUBSTAN CONFORH-GENERAL 1 0 .00 453.00 1 0 .00 864.00 1 0 .00 620.00 2 0 .00 100.00 2 0 .00 1,776.00 2 0 .00 6,380.00 1 0 .00 1,699.00 I 0 .00 370.00 11 0 .00 12.262.00 * TOTAL ** 11 0 .00 12,262.00 ** APPROVAL ~{~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER /~_ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 24, 1994 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for April, 1994. \agdrpt\0222\moactrpt CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report MAY, 1994 Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet ~/Prepared by: Don Spagnolo Date: May 13, 1994 I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. Riverton Park: Dedication Ceremony will be held on May 19, 1994. 2. Pala Community Park: The plans are being revised to reflect the proposed phasing. Negotiations between the City and the contractor to revise the scope of work to reflect the proposed phasing of the project are expected to be completed in May. Construction should begin in June. 3. Pujol Street Improvements: The project is complete and a recommendation for acceptance will proceed to City Council on June 14, 1994. 4. Sports Park Slope Repair: Construction began at the end of April, 1994. The project is expected to be completed by the end of June, 1994. The City is currently working with M.W.D. to ensure that San Diego Pipelines No. I and 2 are protected during construction. The contractor has completed approximately 25% of the project, which includes the reconstruction of the slope below Margarita Road, the installation of an "irrigation system and landscaping on the reconstructed slope, and the reconstruction of a portion of the earthen channel meandering through the park. 5. Long Valley Wash Channel: The Board of Directors rejected all bids during the April 26, 1994 T.C.S.D. Board Meeting. Plans and Specifications will be revised and completed by the end of May, 1994 and the project will be re-bid. Construction is expected to begin in the beginning of July, 1994 and be completed by the beginning of August, 1994. The project consists of the removal of sediment from several deslilting basins and portions of the channel flowline, the reconstruction of portions of the channel's flowline and banks, and the rehabilitation of a rip-rap drop structures. pw04\moactrpt\cip~94\May 05/11194 Monthly Activity Report May, 1994 Page 2 6. Solana Way Street Improvements: The bids were opened on January 20, 1994 and once the CFD 88-12 reimbursement agreements are finalized by the adjacent owners, a pre-construction meeting can be scheduled with the contractor Yeager Construction, to begin construction of the road improvements. 7. Ynez Road Landscape Imorovements: The bids were opened on April 28, 1994 and City Council has awarded the project to Emerald Landscape Services. The City Clerk's office will send the contract, bond forms and affidavit to Emerald Landscape Services by May 16, 1994 for their signature and return to the City. Construction should start by the beginning of June, 1994. II. PROJECTS BEING BID: 1. Loma Linda Park - I1: The bid opening will take place May 26, 1994. A construction contract is expected to be awarded in the beginning of June, 1994 and construction is expected to begin in the beginning of July, 1994. The project consists of grading and the installation of irrigation, landscaping, play equipment and other amenities. 2. Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park: Final plan check comments on the plans and specifications for the concession stand and rest room facilities at Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park, Project No. PW94-01CSD, have been addressed. Solicitation of bids is expected to take place in the beginning of June, 1994. A construction contract is expected to be awarded in the beginning of July, 1994 and construction is expected to begin in the beginning of August, 1994. II1. WORK IN DESIGN 1. Winchester Road Interim Ramp Improvements: The Consultant submitted the plans and specification for Project No. PW 94-03 to Caltrans on May 10, 1994 for a final plan check and comments should be returned to the City by the end of May. }w04\moactrpt~cip\94\May 05/11/94 Monthly Activity Report May, 1994 Page 3 2. Winchester Road Loop: The consultant has submitted the revised Project Report to Caltrans and the plans were submitted to Caltrans on December 27 for their review. 3. Liefer Road, John Warner Road, and Santiago Road: The City has selected a consultant for each of the three road projects. The consultants were selected and ranked on qualifications. Staff has notified all participants of the results. The service level R funding source for the above road projects was scheduled for a public hearing on June 14, 1994, but the City Council has recommended that an alternative source of funding be used for the above project. 4. Walcott Corridor: RBF & Associates has started the design and is expected to submit the first plan check at the end of July. 5. Pala Road/Route 79S Interim Improvements A contract has been entered into with Trans-Pacific Consultants to perform professional engineering services on Pala Road/Route 79S for an east bound to south bound right turn lane. The consultant has prepared improvement plans, and is scheduled to submit plans to the City on May 10, 1994. The consultant will also obtain a Caltrans encroachment permit. 6. Sports Park Parking and Skate Board Park The conceptual design has been approved by the Board of Directors. The design engineer is expecting to submit the 'improvement plans for first check by the middle of June, 1994. The improvements include grading, installation of irrigation, landscaping, roller hockey rink, skateboard park, sidewalk, rest room facility and parking lot. pwO4\moectrpt\cip~94~May 05/11/94 I- 2 rr n Z U.I Cl Z ,,,i (.) I- _1 (.,I I- z if- z ,,,i u r,, u.I uJ Z o > 0 o n.' ~ o~z z 0 ~0 z oooo LAND DEVELOPMENT Monthly Activity Report Special Projects April, 1994 Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet Prepared by:~.Flaymond A. Casey r'Date: May 12, 1994 FEMA/OES REIMBURSEMENT: Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has reimbursed the City a total of $246,297 to date. LIEFER ROAD/BRIDGE (PROJECT NO. PW93-02): The project is currently under construction. The bridge sections have been placed on the abutments, the concrete bridge decking and the concrete barriers along with the concrete channel located under the bridge have been constructed. The next construction activities will be constructing the bridge approaches, grading the channel and the placement of rock slope protection. --- PARKVIEW SITE (PROJECT NO. PW93-09): The biological review for the Parkview Site is complete and no Gnatcatchers were observed. The Request for Engineering Proposals have been sent out. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 159 (AD 159): The Supplemental Assessment District was reviewed by the Riverside Debt Advisory Council and has been sent out to the property owners. It is anticipated that the bonds will be issued within 30 to 40 days. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161 (AD 161): The Assessment District staff has created the resolution for the formation of the Supplemental Assessment District and presented it to the Board of Supervisors. The supplemental has also been sent out to the property owners. It is anticipated that the bonds could be issued within 30 to 40 days if the District is supported. pw12\rnoactrpt\dev~94\April 051294 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent May 2, 1994 Monthly Activity Report - April 1994 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of April 1994: II. III. IV. V= SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations A. Total S.F. VI. 22 56 1 24 180 18 45,700 31 3,367 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 28 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 23 service order requests for the month of March, 1994. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 39 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M. surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies. pwOS\roads\actrpt\94~04 05/09/94 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - April, 1994 Page No. 2 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the following: · 16,457 L.F. of new and repainted striping · 2,750 L.F. of sand blasting · 0 L.F. of red curb · 56 new and repainted legends The total cost for Orange County striping services was $6,712.03 compared to $0.00 for March, 1994. PESTMASTER SERVICES has comoleted the foliowine: · 64 sites, 675,315 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $1 ,350.82for March, 1994. $3,950 compared The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of April, 1994 was 27,138.75 compared to $11,488.82for the month of March, 1994. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 $17,250.75 $9,888.00 CC: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer pw05\roads\actrpt\94\04 05/09/94 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - April, 1994 Page No. 3 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of December. APOLLO SWEEPING CO. Account No. 5402 Date: April 1, 1994 Margarita Road n/o lower Highway 79 1 hour sweeper clean-up for traffic collision Total Cost $65.00 NELSON PAVING AND SEALING Account No. 5402 Date: April 5, 1994 Del Rey @ Avenida Barca & Avenida Barca @ Via Monterey Job No. 93-94-98 Remove 24' of asphalt berm on West side of street and dispose of legally. Replace with new berm material, and replace 18' of asphalt berm on East side of street. Remove asphalt down spout, back fill and compact slope.. Remove and replace asphalt roadway in two areas totaling 616 sq. ft. Total S.F. 652 Total A.C. 24.5 Tons Total Cost $5,345.00 Account No. 5402 Date: April 6, 1994 A.C. Overlays on Winchester Road w/o Jefferson F/E/B/'F $ Jefferson s/o Winchester F/S/Brr. Total A.C. 20.5 Tons Total S.F. 4,546 Total Cost $3,694.00 pwO5\roads\actrpfi94~04 05/09/94 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- April, 1994 Page No. 4 Account No. 5402 Date: April 8, 1994 EMERGENCY STREET REPAIR Rainbow Canyon Road at entrance to Golf Course Remove failed section of asphalt paving from road way with jackhammer and dispose of legally. Recompact subgrade as required. Furnish and place 6" of concrete material in area of street to match existing contour. Includes all equipment, labor, material, and traffic control. Total Cost $1,930.75 DEL RIO CONTRACTORS Account No. 5401 Date: April 1, 1994 Install single box culvert on Ynez s/o Vallejo at equestrian trail. Total Cost $9,888.00 C & C GRADING AND PAVING Account No. 5402 Date: April 8, 1994 Margarita and Rancho California Road S.W.C. A.C. R & R 340 S.F. A.C. Overlay 817 S.F. Total S.F. 1,157 Total A.C. 13 Tons Total Cost $2,921.00 pwO5\roads~actrpt\94~.04 05/09194 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- April, 1994 Page No. 5 K.L.M. ENGINEERING Account No. 5402 Date: April 14, 1994 Deportola Road s/o Jedediah Smith & n/o Margarita R/R 8' 6" A.C. Curb Build 15' x 6" Concrete Drainage Flume 1/4-1/2 rip-rap concrete slurry R/R 28' 6" A.C. Curb including 8' berm wrap Reset I chain length metal post Fill and compact edge of pavement area 6' x 8' suitable import material Replace grouted/rip-rap area 3' x 5' Total $3,295.00 pwO5\roads\ectrpt~94\04 05/09/94 ,~ a o _ m I-- -r '~ 0 0 o o o o ~ oe o ~m z _J =:) [L LL 0 v Z 0 ~ 0 n 0 0 t,/) ,¢ ee ee 0 ~ 0 0 O~ Oe 0 ~ eO uJ Z _a grimz = = oo,,, · 0 0 u) uJ C) uJ .~.- "' a a a z ,,--~"' s~ n- _1 Z W uJ Z afr,~lD c m ,, '¢ ~ w _1 ,¢ uJwU¢ ~ fr O' UJ Z [3 ~__1 'J O F- 0 ma'o ~ "~0 o w ~: Ow Z .-J Z Z n- Z 0 w ~ Z ¢n a- "'=~d o ~ ~: z z z ~ ~ _ ~. ~ ~_ e_ = =w · ~ (/) (/) (D(D ~ e (/) n H~¢rr ~. r..) z Z H c~ II 000~ o8 n' . ~. W ~, W °8 o~ ,o CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED APRIL 1994 CA TCH BASINS I DATE ~ LOCATION: 04-25-94 "Old Town" (Rain) 04-26-94 Area #3 and #4 (Rain) 0 S-94 Area #2 (Rain) WORK COMPLETED :leaned 9 Catch Basins ;leaned 4 Catch Basins :leaned 5 Catch Basins TOTAL 18 ;ATCH 3ASINS :LEANED -1- pw03\roads\wkcmpltd~94\04.CB 050994 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION APRIL 1994 GRAFFITI REMOVAL I DATE 04-04-94 04-04-94 04-05-94 04-05-94 04-06-94 04-06-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-11-94 04-12-94 04-12-94 04-12-94 04-12-94 04-12-94 LOCATION Winchester ~ Jefferson Preece @ Ynez Road Ynez Road @ Preece N. Gen. Kearney @ Joseph Road N. Gen. Kearney @ Nicholas Road Sport's Park Quiet Meadows @ Ynez Rio Vista @ Rancho Vista Rancho Vista @ Calle Santa Ana Paseo Goleta @ Rancho Vista Corte Monteil @ Paseo Goleta Butterfield @ Rancho Vista Meadows Parkway @ Pauba Winchester Road E/O Diaz 28559 Pujol Street 28550 Pujol Street 28747 Pujol Street 28681 Pujol Street Main Street @ Bridge :lemoved 168 :removed 480 :iemoved 40 :removed 12 :!emoved 350 :removed 180 :removed 180 :lemoved 220 :lemoved 80 :lemoved 40 :removed 20 =,emoved 50 :removed 300 :removed 14 =lemoved 30 :lemoved 168 :!emoved 10 :lemoved 12 =,emoved 8 WORK COMPLETED S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti - 1 - pw03\roeds\wkcmpltd\94%O4.Graffili 051194 G 'FITI REMOVAL - April, 1994 04-12-94 N. Gen. Kearney W/O Margarita =,emoved 9 04-12-94 Nicholas Road @ Calle Medusa :lemoved 5 04-15-94 Rancho Vista @ Meadows :lemoved 30 04-18-94 Santiago Road 'Bridge :removed 140 04-18-94 28497 Pujol Street :removed 125 04-18-94 28747 Pujol Street =,emoved 8 04-18-94 Pauba @ Ynez Road N.EoC. :removed 6 04-19-94 Meadows Parkway @ Pauba =,emoved 280 04-25-94 Rancho Vista @ Butterfield :removed 24 04-25-94 Rancho Calif. Rd. E/O Moraga Rd. :lemoved 10 04-26-94 28860 Front Street :lemoved 20 04-27-94 28900 Front Street :iemoved 248 TOTAL 31 ,OCATIONS TOTAL S.F. 3,267 S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti / I I I -2- pwO3\roads~wkcmpltd~94\O4.Graffiti 051194 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION I DATE 04-04-94 04-04-94 04-04-94 04-04-94 04-05-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-08-94 04-08-94 04-14-94 04-14-94 04-14-94 04-15-94 04-18-94 04-18-94 04-21-94 04-21-94 04-21-94 ~LOCATION 43945 Northgate Avenue 31809 Via Satrio 39920 Snow Gum Solana Way E/O Ynez Road Preece @ Ynez Road Ynez Road @ Preece 27483 Lark Court 30790 San Pasqual 30325 Del Rey Road 29826 Via Puerta Del Sol Main Street @ Mercedes 43633 Buckeye 41400 Bitter Creek 41348 Yuba Circle 41604 Big Sage Court Rancho Vista @ Meadows Parkway I-15 @ Rancho Calif. Road 1/4 Mile N/O Rancho Calif. Road on Ynez Road 31105 Camino del Este 44711 Johnston Drive 29885 Del Rey Road WORK COMPLETED APRIL 1994 SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG B REQUEST Weed abatement Manhole Cover Missing Had tar on car Pothole Graffiti Graffiti Sidewalk repairs Sweeper concern Sprinkler repair Sweeper concern Couch on R.O.W. Ants on sidewalk Sprinkler run-off Repaving of Calle Pina Colada Tree drops (leaves in backyard) Graffiti Graffiti Paint on truck Trash Pick-up concern Street name sign missing Paint on driveway WORK COMPLETED 04-05-94 04-04-94 04-04-94 04-04-94 04-05-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-07-94 04-08-94 04-08-94 04-08-94 04-08-94 04-14-94 04-14-94 04-14-94 04-15-94 04-18-94 04-18-94 04-21-94 04-21-94 04-21-94 pwO3%roads\wkcmpltd\94\O4.svrq 050294 ~,. 22-94 04-25-94 04-25-94 04-26-94 04-27-94 04-27-94 04-27-94 39148 Rising Hill Drive Moraga & Margarita Solana Way & Rycrest 27040 Ynez Road Main Street Bridge 47333 Pala Road 41770 Margarita Tree trimming Trash pick-up Pothole Tree down Craking at both ends. Driveway is caving in. Broken glass 04-25-94 04-26-94 04-26-94 04-26-94 04-27-94 04-27-94 04-27-94 TOTAL S.O.R'S. 28 pwO3%roads%wkcmpltd\94\O4.svrq 050294 DATE 04-01-94 04-01-94 04-05-94 04-05-94 04-06-94 04-06-94 04-08-94 04-11-94 04-11-94 04-12-94 04-12-94 04-13-94 04-13-94 04-14-94 04-14-94 04-18-94 04-18-94 04-25-94 04-25-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETE APRIL 1994 i LOCATION : Rancho California Road @ Cosmic Rancho Vista @ Via Vistana Ynez Road S/O Vallejo Avenida Barca @ Margarita Community Recreation Center Senior Center Rainbow Canyon Road S/O Pala Solana Way W/O Motor Car Pina Colada @ N. General Kearney N. General Kearney @ Pina Colada N. General Kearney E/O Margarita First Street and Pujol Replaced W-9 "T.C." Replaced R-1 Stolen Installed 2 W-45 & 6 Delineators Replaced R-1 "Graffiti" Installed 8 Spec. Signs Installed 2 Spec. Signs Replaced W-17 "Old" Installed 3 Carsonites Replaced 2 Type "N" W-57, W-31 "Old" Replaced 2 Type "N" W-57 Installed 13 Carsonites Installed W-31 4 Type "N" 2 Carsonites Replaced 4 Type "N .... Old" Replaced R-2 "35 .... Old" 'lnst~lled 1 Carsonite ... Replaced W-7 With W-2A ., ' Replaced W~7 With W-7A Replaced 3 Bike Lane Signs "T.C." Ynez Road @ Equity Drive Estero Street @ Colina Verde La Serena @ Via Aguila Del Rey S/O Via Corsica Del Rey @ Solana Way Rancho California Road @ Margarita & Moraga Moraga @ Margarita Replaced W-57 Type "N .... Old" PWO3\ROADS/WKCMPLTD\94\O4.SIGNS 050994 ;- SI ~ - April, 1994 04-26-94 04-26-94 04-27-94 04-27-94 Jedediah Smith @ Calle de Velardo Ynez Road S/O Via Halcon City Limits Margarita Road S/O Rancho Vista- Repaired Installed Installed Installed . S.N.S. 1 Carsonite 7 Sister City Signs 6 Ro30' TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTAE, LED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 22 56 1 PW03\ROADS/WKCMPLTD~94\04.SIGNS 050994 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED APRIL 1994 DATE 04-11-94 04-12-94 04-13-94 04-18-94 04- t 9-94 04-20-94 04-27-94 O~ -28-94 04-28-94 LOCATION Meadowview/Area #4/ See Daily for Locations Meadowview/Area #4/ See Daily for Locations Meadowview/Area #4/ See Daily for Locations Meadowview/Area #4/ See Daily for Locations Meadowview/Area#4/ See Daily for Locations Meadowview/Area#4/ See Daily for Locations Margarita S/O Rancho Vista Rancho California Road W/O Moraga Margarita S/O Rancho Vista STENCILING I~/: z::::: ~!:;::: :i~i{ii~!!iii!::WORK COMPLETED 3rind & Repainted 9 Legends Grind & Repainted 6 Legends 3rind & Repainted 10 Legends Grind & Repainted 3rind & Repai~ted 12 Legends 3 Legends 3rind & Repainted Sand Blasted 300 L.F. of Red Curb. =ainted 210 L.F. of Red :urb. =ainted 420 L.F. of Red · 3urb. 10 Legends 4.6 avg. 4.5 6.5 TOTAL LEGENDS 3RIND & REPAINTED TOTAL RED CURB NSTALLED & :IEPAINTED TOTAL SANDBLASTING L.F. 50 630 300 PW03~ROADS/WKCMPLTD\94\04.STN 050694 DATE 04-05-94 04-05-94 04-06-94 ( 8-94 04-08-94 0,::~- 11 04-21-94 ,~ 04-21-94 .i. 04-21-94 04 -26-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED APRIL 1994 I LOCATION Business Park Drive West Pujol Street S/O First Mercedes S/O Sixth Street Community Center / Pujol Margarita @ Ave. Barca S.E.C. Via Norte @ Del Rey Road Margarita @ Ave. Barca Del Rey E/O Ave. Barca Del Rey @ Ave. del Reposo Ynez Rd. S/B @ County Center TREE TRIMMING I WORK COMPLETED Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Removed I tree 3 trees 3 trees 5 trees 3 trees 5 trees I tree I tree 2 trees 1 tree TOTAL TREES TRIMMED TOTAL TREES REMOVED 24 1 pw03\roads\wkcmpltd\94\04.tre 050494 J DATE 04-05-94 04-05-94 04-11-94 04-12-94 04-12-94 04-12-94 04-13-94 04-13-94 04-14-94 04-14-94 04-14-94 04-18-94 04-19-94 04-20-94 04-20-94 I LOCATION CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED APRIL 1994 WEED ABATEMENT I Ynez S/O Vallejo "C" Street N/O Santiago Solana Way W/O Motorcar Parkway Del Rey Road @ Nogales Del Rey Road W/O Ave. Barca Nicholas ~ Calle Medusa Ynez Road @ Town Center Ynez Road @ Solana Way Via Norte @ Ave. Centenario La Serena @ Via Aguila" Calle Medusa S/O La Serena Del Rey @ Solana Way Rancho Calif. Rd. N/O Ynez Road Rancho Calif. Rd. N/O Ynez Road Rancho Calif. Rd. E&W/O Front Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated WORK COMPLETED I 1,200 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 4,500 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds' 1,000 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 2,000 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 800 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 50 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 800 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 4,200 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 100 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds · 50 S.F.R.O.W, Weeds 1,650 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 1,500 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 3,200 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 7,750 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 1,600 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds - 1 - pw03\roads\wkcmpltd\94%O4.Weeds 050494 ABATEMENT - April, 1994 04-21-94 04-21-94 Ave. Barca Btwn. Margarita & Del Rey Road Del Rey E/O Ave. Barca 04-21-94 Rancho Calif. Rd. W/O Humber 04-25-94 Rancho Calif. Rd. W/O Humber 04-25-94 Moraga Rd. N/O Rancho Calif. Rd. Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated TOTAL S.F. 1,800 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 1,000 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 1,800 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 10,000 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 700 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds 45,700 -2- pw03\roads\wkcmpltd\94\O4.Weeds 050494 TRAFFIC DIVISION Monthly Activity Report For April, 1994 Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet.-~-~ Prepared by: Marry Lauber '~//~ Date: May 10, 1994 TRAFFIC REQUESTS TRAFFIC REQUESTS: Received Completed Under Investigation Scheduled for Traffic Commission Feb March April 5 12 5 15 9 6 9 10 9 I 4 I II. ON GOING PROJECTS: Held the second meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's Jefferson Street Sub-Committee. All adjacent property owners and businesses received announcements to either of two available workshop sessions. Input was received and a follow-up workshop set for May 20, 1994. Designed Traffic signal and Roadway Striping changes to create dual left turn lanes for southbound Front Street at Rancho California Road. Met with Caltrans to discuss potential improvements to State Highway 79(S) between I-15 and Pala Road. Two options discussed were installing a four-way stop at SR79 (S) and I-15 south bound ramps and creating a right turn only lane for west bound approach to I-15 north bound ramp. Finalized the Traffic Division's Traffic Control Plan Checklist. This handout is available to all Contractors and Engineers requested to submit plans. This takes the guess-work out of plan development by defining City requirements prior to submittals. Submitted final grant application to the Office of Traffic Safety for a portable radar display trailer and public informational brochures. This is the primary step in developing a Neighborhood Traffic Watch program. r:~,moectrpt~trafflc\94~ntay/ejp Traffic Division Monthly Activity Report For April, 1994 Page 2 G. Status of Design Projects Location Nicolas RdNVinchester Rd - Temporary Traffic Signal * Avenida Barca/Margarita Rd - Traffic Signal * Margarita Rd/S.R. 79 (S) - Traffic Signal ** Pala Rd/S.R. 79 (S) - Rt. turn lane Emergency Vehicle Pre-Emption System Design Submitted to Returned from Caltrans Caltrans 100%' 3/1/94 4/26/94 5//94 100% 3/1/94 4/26/94 5/10/94 40% 80% 100% Prepared RFP and Staff Report Project Specifications Traffic Signal Plans Submitted to Caltrans - February 28, 1994 Received plancheck comment back from Caltrans - April 27, 1994 On hold awaiting civil engineering design of ultimate improvements. Available funding will determine scope of project improvements. Signal de~sign is dependent on specific improvements. r:~moactrpt\traffic\94\maylajp TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD APRIL 26, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:17 PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Parks, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone PM. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS:. None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and June S. Greek, City Clerk. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson requested that all bids be rejected on Item No. 6 and this project be re-advertised. It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Parks to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1-6. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0. DIRECTORS: None 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 22, 1994. Contract for July 4th, 1994 Fireworks Show 2.1 Award a contract to Robert Caran Productions to produce the City of Temecula's 1994 July 4th Fireworks Show. Minutes/040594 -1- O5112/94 CSD Minutes April 26. 1994 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Kent Hinderqardt Memorial Park (PW94-01CSD) and Loma Linda Park - Phase II (PW94-02CSD) 3.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park (PW94-01CSD)and Loma Linda Park - Phase II (PW94-O2CSD). m Amendment to the Desiqn Contract for Pala Community Park - Project No. PW93- 03CSD 4.1 Approve Amendment No. 4 to the design contract with Wimmer-Yamada Associates (WYA) to provide additional engineering and architectural services for Pala Community park, Project No. PW93-03CSD, in an amount not to exceed $9,700.00. 5. Professional Services Contract - Soorts Park Slope Repair - Project No. PW93-06CSD 5.1 Authorize an advance of $9,868.00 from the General Fund to the CIP Fund. 5.2 Appropriate $9,868.00from the CIP Fund to Account No. 210-166-648-8504. 6. Award a Construction Contract for Lone Valley Wash - Channel Repair - PW94-06CSD 6.1 Reject all bids and direct staff to re-advertise the project. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. Rancho California Sports Park Imorovement Project Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson introduced Senior Management Analyst Phyllis Ruse and Consultant Alan Fishman to present the staff report. Alan Fishman, J.F. Davidson, 'briefly discussed all elements of the Sports Park Improvement Project. Senior Management Analyst Phyllis Ruse summarized the staff report. Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson reported that the CRC Foundation has contacted the City with an offer to fund the construction of the Roller Hockey Rink Director Mu~oz asked if a waiver release would be required for those using the Skateboard Park. Mr. Nelson stated this was being drawn up. Director Parks stated he received a letter from Metropolitan Water District indicating that they had not been contracted regarding the MWD right-of-way. Director of Community Services Nelson stated he feels confident this issue can be resolved. Mr. Fishman reported that only the parking area and channel crossing are over existing Minute.,1040594 -2- 05/12194 CSD Minutes April 26, 1994 water lines. President Stone opened the public hearing at 8:40 PM. Pastor Joe Rider, 20175 Ross Road, Wildomar, spoke in favor of the project. Daniel Bocock, 24808 Half Dome Court, Murrieta, representing the Rancho Baptist Church Skateboard Park, spoke in favor of the project. President Stone closed the public hearing at 8:44 PM. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 7.1 Approve the master plan for the Rancho California Sports Park Improvement project. 7.2 Adopt Negative Declaration for the project. 7.3 Authorize the preparation of construction documents and release a formal public bid for the project. The motion was unanimously carried. DISTRICT BUSINESS 8. Temecula Town Association Lease of the Northwest Sports Complex Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report. Director Mu~oz asked if this lease will interfere with other uses of the site. Mr. Nelson reported this presents no problems with the Shoemaker agreement. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve the lease agreement between the City of Temecula and the Temecula Town Association for the use of the Northwest Sports Complex. The motion was unanimously carried. 9. Discussion of Master Plan for Park View Site Director Mu~oz stated he requested this matter be placed on the agenda to discuss a master plan for the site and to make a fire station, possibly located close to Margarita and Pauba, a priority. He suggested setting aside 10 acres for some future public use and reserving the balance of the property for open space land. It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Mu~oz to direct the Community Minutes/040594 -3- 0511 2194 CSD Minutes April26,1994 Services District to move forward with a fire station, reserving 10 acres for future public facilities. Director Parks stated he agrees with the master planning of this area, but would not want to put limitations that the balance be used only for open space before the master plan process is complete. Director Roberrs agreed with the majority of the site being used as passive park and agreed the fire station should be a priority. Director Birdsall stated she feels it is premature to make any decision on this site before the master plan is brought before the board. Director of Community Services Nelson explained that the Master Plan must be brought before the Board for approval, and suggested direction to move forward with the master plan process by forming a committee involving two members of the board as well as neighboring homeowners. Director Stone withdrew his motion and Director Mu~oz withdrew his second. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Birdsall to direct staff to proceed with development of a Master Plan for the site taking into consideration the comments of the Board regarding the need to hasten the development of a Fire Station, the possibility of setting aside approximately 10 acres for future development of a City project and development of the remainder of the property as open space/recreation. Staff was further directed to authorize a sub-committee of the Board as well as representatives from neighboring homeowners on the master plan task force. The motion was unanimously carried. GENERAL MANGER'S REPORT None given. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson announced the pool at the CRC is now filled with water. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None given. DIRECTORS REPORTS None given. Minutes1040594 -4- 05/12/94 CSD Minutes April 26, 1994 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Roberts, seconded by Director Mu~oz to adjourn at 9:06 PM to a meeting on May 10, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Jeff Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk\TCSD Secretary Minutes/O40594 -5- 05112~94 ITEM NO. 2 APPRO~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager May 24, 1994 Acceptance of Easement Deeds and Street Lighting. PREPARED BY: ~,~.~ Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Accept easement deeds for the TCSD to provide landscape maintenance services. Accept Tract 21760 into the existing Rancho Highlands landscape maintenance rate level. 3. Accept arterial and residential street lights. BACKGROUND: Prior to the beginning of each new fiscal year, staff reviews applications from developers requesting to dedicate street lighting and perimeter slope areas into the TCSD maintenance programs. Based upon the number of lumens and location of the street lights, the energy costs are transfered into Service Level A for arterial street lighting, and into' Service Level B for residential street lighting. Perimeter slope areas are maintained through Service Level C. Several developers have filed applications to dedicate perimeter slopes and landscaping into the TCSD maintenance program beginning July 1,1994. The slope areas have been inspected by the Maintenance Superintendent and are acceptable to TCSD standards. The attached easement documents for the respective landscape areas have been reviewed to ensure that all legal requirements have been satisfied. In addition, the Rancho Highlands Homeowners Association Board (HOA) has formally requested that Tract 21760 be accepted into the existing TCSD landscape maintenance program and rate level for their development. Tract 21760 is within the jurisdiction of the aforementioned HOA and receives benefit from the perimeter landscaping. Inclusion of this tract into the maintenance program also distributes the maintenance costs to a larger area, thereby reducing the overall charge to each property owner. A copy of the HOA board meeting minutes and subsequent request letter are attached for your review. R:\YASIN OBK\CSD. LLT 051294 Therefore, the easement deeds effecting the following tracts are being recommended for acceptance and recordation: Tracts 23267-0, thru -4 and Tracts 26861-1 thru 2: Presley of San Diego Tracts 22915-1, thru -3: Vintage Hills Tracts 22203, 22204, 20643, 20644, and 21760: Rancho Highlands Staff is also recommending the acceptance of arterial and residential street lights into the respective TCSD Service Levels, as follows: Service Level A Avenida de Missions Via Rio Temecula Country Glen Way Service Level B 1. Tract 23126 7. 2. Tract 22916-1 8. 3. Tract 21760 9. 4. Tracts 23267-0,thru -4 10. 5. Tracts 24133-1 ,thru-4 I 1. 6. Tract 22915-1 Tracts 24130-0, thru -4 Tracts 24135-1 ,-3 Tract 25004-1 Tract 19872-0 Tract 23177 FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the slopes and street lighting will be incorporated into the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1994-95. Costs for maintaining the slope areas will be included into Service Level C. The energy costs for arterial street lights will be included into Service Level A and residential street lighting into Service Level B. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Landscape Easement Deeds. 2. Correspondence from Rancho Highlands HOA. R:\YASINOBK\CSD.LLT 051294 Recording Requested By and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). Parcel: Tract No. 23267 Lots 117-119 Project: Old Vail Ranch IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation ("Transferor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the CITY OF TEMECULA ("Transferee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibits "A" and "C" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). There is no Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Parcel B described on Exhibits "A" and "C" is within the public right of way and not covered by this Offer to Dedicate. This Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate is intended to transfer easements transferred to TRANSFEROR by Deed of Landscape Easement recorded April 21, 1994 as Instrument No. 167059, Official Records of Riverside County, California. If TRANSFEREE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of TRANSFEROR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the TRANSFEROR. DATED: VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On z)/'°2 (~'~5/ before me ~/~Z~--~ EL)~)_~/~' , Notary Public, personally appeared / ~ _ ~ ~/~ ~ ~ , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (Seal) CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Transferee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. DATED: June S. Greek, City Clerk Veranda/Phase 8 "EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT RFE EIVED MAY 3 1994 CITYOFTEI/IECULA 8'/G1NEEFIING DEPARTT/MENT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 117 THROUGH 119 OF TRACT NO. 25267. IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29 THROUGH 35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE'COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF'LOT 117 OF TRACT NO. 23267, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 117 THROUGH 119 AND ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT: SAID POINT ALSO BEIN6 ON THE ARC OF A 1044.00 FOOT RADIUS' CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06'37'59" A DISTANCE OF 120.86 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 119: THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 119, NORTH 71'12'09" WEST 19.53 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT: THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 119, NORTH 22'55'00" WEST 80.15 FEET: THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT i19, NORTH 22'05'00" EAST 4.0i FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 67'55'00" EAST 2.21 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 22'55'00" EAST 81.27 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 74'27'11" EAST 12.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 68'11'44" EAST 33.15 FEET: THENCE NORTH 73'17'00" EAST 44.22 FEET: THENCE NORTH 74'23'14" EAST 43.82 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 117 OF SAID TRACT: THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 14'24'49" EAST 5.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.026 ACRES MORE DR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERET0 AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS"'A" AND "E" OF TRACT NO. 23267. IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240. PAGES 29 THROUGH 35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 117 OF TRACT NO. 23267, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 117 THROUGH 119 AND ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT: SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE ARC OF A 1044.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY: THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A"o WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06'37'59" A DISTANCE OF 120.86 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT i19. SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "E" OF SAID TRACT 23267: THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "E", NORTH 71'12'09" WEST 19.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22'55'00" WEST 80.15 FEET: THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 119, NORTH 22°05'00`. EAST 4.01 FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY J.N. 225-089 4-11-94 OLB/SBE LINE. NORTH 67'55'00- WEST 6.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 22'05'00" WEST 6.50 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 22'55'00" EAST 85.55 FEET~ THENCE SOUTH 71'12'0e" EAST 24.5e FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 1058.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY. A RADIAL LINE TO SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 21'10'00" WEST: THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06'45'11" A DISTANCE OF 122.54 FEET: THENCE NORTH 14'24'4e" WEST 6.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.052 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS. RIGHTS. RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. J.N. 225-089 4-11-94 ¢URVE DATA NO. RADIUS DELTA ARC, TAN Cl !035.00' 0G'45'11-' 122.34' G1.24' C,2 1044.0D' Oa'37'Sq' 120.5G' GO.50' EASEMENT IN FAVOI~ OF TOSD (PAI~C8_ 'A'" 0.026 AC.) ' ' ..... PL..BLIC ~IGI-4'T-OF-WAY (PAi~CEL 'B' - 0.032 AC.) Y.,o c,- -,,e ' ,~,,~.,,, 6M.D "-'/ Y ,.,9 9 SI:~. VICINITY MAP ~ 0 yy ~n 7 0 / N21'lO'OO'WCR) LINE DATA NO. BEARING DISTANC, E L1 NG7 ',55 '00 'W Z.Z1-' L2 N23'41'lq'W 81.27' L3 N74'ZT'11'W 12.2q' L4 NGB'11'44'E 33.15' L5 N73'17'OO'E 44.22' LG N74'23'13'E 43.82' L7 N14'24'4q 'W 5.50' L15 N71'1Z'Oq'W lq.53' Lq NZZ'55'OO'W 150.15' L1-O NZ2'OS'OO'E 4.01,' Lll N14'24'4q'W G.OO' L12 N71'12 'Oq'W 24.3q' L13 N22'55'OO'W 85.33' L1,4 N22'05'00 'E G.50' L1_5 NG7'55'00 'W G.O0' VIA 0 No, 232~7-3 J\Z,B, 240/2c)-2s LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PORTIONS OF LOTS 117 THROUGH 119 AND PORTIONS OF LOTS "A' AND 'E" OF TRACT NO. 23267 RECORDED IN BOOK 240, Recording Requested By and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the Cjty of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). Parcel: Tract No. 23267 Lots 106-116 Projedt: Old Vail Ranch IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation ("Transferor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the CITY OF TEMECULA ('Transferee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibits "A" and "C" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). There is no Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Parcel B described on Exhibits "A" and "C" is within the public right of way and not covered by this Offer to Dedicate. This Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate is intended to transfer easements transferred to TRANSFEROR by Deed of Landscape Easement recorded April 21, 1994 as Instrument No. 167056, Official Records of Riverside County, California. If TRANSFEREE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of TRANSFEROR,. with all covenants and agreements of this easement exten. ding to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the TRANSFEROR. DATED: VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporati~ By~ Veranda/Phase 6 4/26/94 - 1 - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) )ss. ) personally appeared ~F . , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/ere subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(leE), end that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. !~~.~ ,~ ~!:;~r~.c.,.o~.~.,~4 . NOTA~Y PUBLIC · CAUFC~N~ (Seal) Sig atur Q · CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Transferee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. DATED: June S. Greek, City Clerk ~AY ~ 1994 C~O~ EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 106 THROUGH 116 OF TRACT NO. 25267. IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240. PAGES 29 THROUGH 35 OF MAPS. IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ' BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER.OF LOT 116 OF TRACT NO. 25267, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 106 THROUGH 116 AND ON THE NORTHERLy LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT: SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE ARC OF A 1044.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY: THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE: EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'56'10" A DISTANCE OF 89.94 FEET: THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 80'51'21" EAST 339.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 956.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLy: THENCE NORTHEASTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'55'06" 65.58 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 106. A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS. SOUTH 15'23'45" EAST: THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 106. NORTH 33°21'21" EAST 20.54 FEET: THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 106, NORTH 17'50'O0"WEST 79.38 FEET: THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 106. NORTH 62'50'00" WEST 2.80 FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLy LINE. SOUTH 27'50'00" WEST 1.20 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 17'02'07"EAST 79.65 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 35'41'55- WEST 15.24 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 77'50'10" WEST 40.92 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 80'50'01" WEST 159.42 FEET: THENCE SOUTH SO'i9'3e" WEST-154.96 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 80'46'57- WEST 90.05 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT 1049.70 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLy; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02'29'18" A DISTANCE OF 45.59 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 7&'32'03" WEST 44.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 14'24'49- EAST 5.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.069 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY.THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAy THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS "A" AND "H" OF TRACT NO. 25267. IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29 THROUGH 55 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLy CORNER OF LOT I16 OF TRACT NO. 25267, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 106 THROUGH 116 AND ON THE NORTHERLy LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT: SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE ARC OF A 1044.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY: THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'56'10" A DISTANCE OF 89.94 FEET: THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 80'31'21" EAST 339.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 956.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLy: THENCE NORTHEASTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'55'06" 65.38 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLy CORNER OF SAID LOT 106. A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS, SOUTH 13'25'45" EAST, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHWESTERLy LINE OF LOT "H" OF SAID TRACT: THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLy LINE, NORTH 53'21'21" EAST 20.54 FEET: THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 106. NORTH 17'50'O0"WEST 79.58 FEET: THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 106. NORTH 62'50°00" WEST 2.80 FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE. NORTH 27'50'00" EAST 6.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 17'50°00" EAST: THENCE SOUTH 55'21'21" WEST 25.77 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A e62.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY. A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 15'52'16" EAST: THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID'CURVE'THROUGH A CENTRAL'ANGLE OF 04'05'57" A DISTANCE OF 68.17 FEET: THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 80'5i'2i" WEST55e.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1058.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY: THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°5~'10" A DISTANCE OF 8e.45 FEET: THENCE NORTH 14'24'49" WEST 6.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.085 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS. RIGHTS. RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. Ir-C..eXD .:://./////~////:':.~, F~vo~ oF ?csc> ~,~c.~_ .~-- o.o69 ~c.~ PUBLIC I~IGI--IT-OF-WAy (PA.2CEL "'B' · 0,083 ACJ CURVE DATA NO. RADIUS DELTA ARC 01 1035.00' 04'5G'10' Bq.43' C2 104c{.70' 02'2ct'18 45.5q' 03 qEG.0O' 03'55'0G' G5.35' 64 1044.00' 04'5G'10' 8cl.q4' 05 qGZ.O0' 04'0:3'37' GB.17' LINE DATA NO. BEARING L1 NBO'4G'37'E bO' L2 NB,0'lq'3q'E L3 NEO'50'O1'E L4 N77'50'IO'E "/ L5 N35'41 Ij7 LG N17'02'07 'W L7 NZ7'30'OO'E La~ NGZ'30'OO'W L~I N17'30'OO'W LIO N33'21'21'E Lll N14'24'4q'W L12 N33'Z1'Z1'E L13 N17'3O'OO'W L14 NG2'30'OO'W L15 N27'30'OO'E VICINITY MAP NO SCALE DISTANCE qO.05' 134.clg· 134.42' 40.q2' 15.24' 7q. GE' 1.20' 2.80' 7cl.3B· 20.54' a. OO' 25.77' 84.71' 5.28' a. O0' \06 ~z S "' XOO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PORTIONS 6F LOTS 106 THROUGH 116 AND LOTS "A" AND "H" OF TRACT NO, 23267 RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29-35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY Recording Requested By and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). Parcel: Tract No. 23267 Lot 10 Project: Old Vail Ranch IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation ("Transferor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the CITY OF TEMECULA ("Transferee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibits "A" and "C" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). There is no Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Parcel B described on Exhibits "A" and "C" is within the public right of way and not covered by this Offer to Dedicate. This Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate is intended to transfer easements transferred to TRANSFEROR by Deed of Landscape Easement recorded November 12, 1993 as Instrument No. 452049, Official Records of Riverside County, California. If TRANSFEREE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, · become the responsibility of TRANSFEROR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the TRANSFEROR. DATED: VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Verand,~/Phase 9 4/4/94 - 1 - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) as. ) On ~/'-}.~-~z3J- , before me, ~J_~ , Notary Public, personally appeared <~-~/Q,~Y~'7. ' ' personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be th; person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(lea), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (Seal) CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Transferee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. DATED: June S. Greek, City Clerk Veranda/Phase 9 4/4/94 -2- "EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF LOT 10 OF TRACT NO. 25267, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29 THROUGH 35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 10 OF SAID TRACT NO. 23267; SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT AND ON THE ARC OF A 5402.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10, NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'55'49" A DISTANCE OF 87.71 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT lOm NORTH 26'15'19" EAST 11.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A 5409.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLYI THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10, SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'00'30" A DISTANCE OF 95.20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 14'11'03" EAST 7.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.016 ACRES MORE DR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT PORTION OF LOT "A" OF TRACT NO. 23267, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 2e THROUGH 35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 10 OF SAID TRACT NO. 23267; SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHE'RLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT AND ON THE ARC OF A 5402.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'55'4e" A DISTANCE OF 87.71 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LiNE OF LOT "E" OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "E", NORTH 26'15'19" EAST 11.41 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 63'44'41" EAST 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28'15'19" WE. ST 15.88 FEET TO A POINT'ON THE ARC OF A 5596.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS, NORTH 22'41'30" WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'57'15" A DISTANCE OF 89.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25'38'45" WEST 8.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.014 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHiS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. LEG =ND II%DICATES LAI%DSCAPE MAINTE~IANCE EASE/~.NT IN FAVOI;2 OF TCSD (PAJ~CEL 'A' - O.OI6 AC3 II%DICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT IN F=AVOI~ OF TCSD WITMIN PUBLIC I~IGI-rT-OI=-WAy (PARCEL ~' · 0.014 ACJ TRACT NO, 23267-4 M,B, 23 6/21~24 Ti~AC1 NO, 23267 240/29-35 B GUf, VE DATA NO. I~ADIU5 DELTA AI~C C1 5402.00' OO'55'4q' 87.71' C2 53qG.OO' OO'57'15' LHE DATA NO. BEAP, ING DISTANCE L1 N14'11'O3'W 7.GO' L2 H2G'15'1q'E 11.41' L3 NG3'44'4~'W G.OO' L4 HZG'IS'lq'E 13.GG' L5 N23'38'45'W G.OO' '~ CINI~ MAP N0 SCA~ TENANCE EASEMENT 0F TRACT N0. 23267 RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29-35 OF MAPS, IN ~E Recording Requested By and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt, Code 6103). Parcel: Tract No. 23267 Lot 105 Project: Old Vail Ranch IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation ("Transferor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the CITY OF TEMECULA ("Transferee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibits "A" and "C" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). There is no Exhibit "B" attached hereto, Parcel B described on Exhibits "A" and "C" is within the public right of way and not covered by this Offer to Dedicate. This Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate is intended to transfer easements transferred to TRANSFEROR by Deed of Landscape Easement recorded November 12, 1993 as Instrument No. 452046, Official Records of Riverside County, California. If TRANSFEREE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of TRANSFEROR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extendifig to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the TRANSFEROR. DATED: VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSO. CIATION, .a California onprofit Mutual ASSOCIATION~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On - re~,/. , personally e personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ( ~,~-~; OFFIC]~LSF./~ i,=' ~. NANCY J. WEBB r~OTARY PUEUC- ~UFORN~ SAN DIEGO COUN~ (Se~{) CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Transferee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. DATED: June S. Greek, City Clerk Veranda/Phase 5 4/4/94 , ,'), 'R."EQEIVED MAY 8 1994 "EXHIBIT "A" ~E~rTYOFTEIaECULA PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT ' THAT PORTION OF LOT 105 OF TRACT NO. 23267, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29 THROUGH 35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 105 OF TRACT NO. 23267, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT; SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE ARC OF A 5328.12 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLy; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 105, SOUTHWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'55'58" A DISTANCE OF 86.74 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 105; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5, NORTH &5°12'25'' WEST 19.29 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 105, NORTH 17'30'00" WEST .42 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, NORTH 72'50'00" WEST .50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72'52'29" EAST 17.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76'48'43" EAST 86.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 105; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH i6'36'43" EAST 5.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.008 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERET0 AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAy THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS "A" AND "H" OF TRACT N0. 23267, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29 THROUGH 35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLy CORNER OF LOT 105 OF TRACT N0. 25267, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT; SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE ARC OF A 5328.12 FOOT RADIUS CURVE ~0NCAVE SOUTHEASTERLy; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", SOUTHWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE Or 00°55'58.. A DISTANCE OF 86.74 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 105 OF SAID TRACT, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT "H" OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "H", NORTH 65'i2'25" WEST i9.29 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "H"; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH i7'30'O0" WEST .42 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "H", SOUTH 72°30'O0" WEST 6.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17'30'OO" EAST 5.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65'i2'25" EAST 24.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A 5522.i2 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH i4'17'35" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'57'21" A DISTANCE OF 88.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13'20'14" WEST 6.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.015 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "C" HEREOF. J.N. 225-089 ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS. REFERENCE MADE A .L. CU/~VE DATA · · NO. RADIUS DELTA ARC, C,3 53,28.12' 00'55'5B' 8.a.74' C2 5..322.12' 00'57 'Z1' e,8.7q' INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAI~OE EAS~ IN FAVOR OF= TCSD (PAECEL 'A' - 0.008 AC3 INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASErv~EN'r IN FAVOQ Of= TCSD WITMIN PUBLIC EIGHT-OF-WAy ' (PAJ~CEL 'B' - O. OI5 ACJ A 0 gg CT 3267 M.B. 240/29-34 VICINITY MAP NO SCALE; LINE DATA NO. BEARING DISTANCE L1 NGS'12'Z5 'W lcI.Zq· LZ N17'30'OO'W 0.42' L3 N72'30'OO'E O.50' L4 N73'SZ'Zq'W 17.01' L5 N72'30'OO'E G.OO' LG N17'30 'OO'W 3,07' L7 NGS'lZ*ZS'W 24.07' LB N13'ZO'14'W G,OO' VIA -\O~, '~" · . ~IG' ~.g~'~'~ \05 ' '~'~ ~ % K~.~,~,~-~.'s.'~~'°s'*~' . ~ox'~' ~COLA ~NDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PORTIONS Of LOTS 105, "A" AND "H" OF TRACT NO. 23267 RECORDED IN BOOK 240 PAGES 29-35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY Recording Requested By and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee IGovt. Code 6103). Parcel: Tract No. 23267 Lots 1-5 and 9 Project: Old Vail Ranch IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation ("Transferor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the CITY OF TEMECULA ("Transferee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibits "A" and "C" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). There is no Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Parcel B described on Exhibits "A" and "C" is within the public right of way and not covered by this Offer to Dedicate. This Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate is intended to transfer easements transferred to TRANSFEROR by Deed of Landscape Easement recorded November 12, 1993 as Instrument No. 452050, Official Records of Riverside County, California. If TRANSFEREE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of TRANSFEROR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the TRANSFERORo DATED: VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) ss. ) On /7/-/5'J95/: , before .,~ ."'~~~. ~ , Notary Public, personally appeared ~Y~'/'~ '~/~d~ personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Transferee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. DATED: June S. Greek, City Clerk Veranda/Phase lO R'E'CEIVED MAY 3 1994 "EXHIBIT "A" CFrYOFTEMECU~ ENG1N~NGOE~TrMENT PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS I THROUGH 5 AND q OF TRACT NO. 25267, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29 THROUGH 35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY'CORNER OF LOT 5 OF SAID TRACT NO. 25287; SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "B" OF SAID TRACT 25267; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS i THROUGH 5 OF SAID TRACT, SOUTH 16'56'45" EAST i9.43 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1550.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY: THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'i8'i7" A DISTANCE OF iie.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20'55'00" EAST 81.71 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT i OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT i, SOUTH 68'2i' 58" EAST 52.78 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT l; SAID POINT BEING ON THE ARC OF A 4598.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS i AND q OF SAID TRACT, NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02'5i'i5" A DISTANCE OF 202.25 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 5402.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'41'20" A DISTANCE OF 84.~5 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 1 AND 9 OF SAID TRACT, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT ~, NORTH 14'1i'05" WEST 7.80 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A 5409.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 25'57'57" WEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT e, SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'42'08" A DISTANCE OF 88.05 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 4590.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02'28'52" A DISTANCE OF 198.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86'21'56"' WEST 25.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20'55'00" WEST 79.58 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1541.50 FOOT RADIUS 'CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE ~HROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'18'17" A DISTANCE OF i15.82 FEET; THENCE.NORTH 18'58'45" WEST 19.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 74'00'00" WEST 8.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.095 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A MADE HEREOF. PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS "A" AND "B" OF TRACT NO. 25287, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29 THROUGH 55 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 5 OF SAID TRACT NO. 25287, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "B" OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "B", SOUTH 18'58'43" EAST 19.51 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1550.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF '04'18'17" A DISTANCE OF li8.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20'55'00" EAST 81.71 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT I OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTH 66'21' 56" EAST ~2.78 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT AND ON THE ARC OF A 4598.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF O2'~1"1~" A DISTANCE OF 202.25 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 5402.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLy| THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OP SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'41"20" A DISTANCE OF 64.e5 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT .9; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", SOUTH 2~'58'45" 6.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC 0F A 5~96.O0 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 25'~8'45" WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'41'20" A DISTANCE OF 64.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 4604.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02'55'06" A DISTANCE OF 205.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66'21'55" WEST 57.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20'55°00" WEST 84.2~ FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1556.O0 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'18'17'* A DISTANCE OF 116.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16'56'4~" WEST 19.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 75'25#17" EAST 6.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.072 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. ,LINE. DATA CURVE DATA NO. BEARING DISTANCE NO. RAD!! ,5 DELTA ARC, L1 NIG'3G'43'W lq.42' C1 155G.00' 04'18'17' 11G.45' L2 N20'55'OO'W 81.71' G2 45qB.O0' 02'31'13' 202.25' L3 NGG'ZI'SG'W 32.78' C,3 5402.00' 00'41'20' G4.qS' L4 N23'38'45'W G.O0' 64 540':L50' 00'42'08' GG.30' L5 N14'11'O3'W ?.GO' C,5 -45q0.50' 02'2B'52' lqB.?B' LG NGG'21 'SG'W 25.0q' C,G 1541...50' 04'18'17' 115.82' L? N20'55'00 'W ?al-SG' LEGEND , ~,,~, ~ EASEN4EhrT IN PAVO~ OP TCSD EASEMENT IN I=AVO;20t= TCSD WITHIN , PUBLIC I;21QI-TT-OF-WAY /eA~C.,EL B - O.O72 AC;~ES} % VICINITY MAP NO SCALE C N o. 232 B7-4 2 236721-24 ~. 84 ~ ,~ -J -J3 %L~ ' . 'L~. ~c ~ 'ilACT NO. 23267 _j_J ' IvU3. 240/29-35 ~" ,,,/" q\ ~,J\,~, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EAS,E~ENT AND 'B' OF TRACT NO. 23267, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29-35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OF THE .e~ at request of and return to: :ry Clerks Department :.ty of Temecula 3i'7.~ Business Park Drive =.mecula, CA 92590 REE RECORDING his instrument is for the benefit of ~e City of Temecula and is errtitled ~ be recorded without fee 3ova. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: Project: Tract No. 232t~ Lot A Old Vail Ranch :OR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The Presley Companies, a Cslifnrn~ CorporatiOn (" Grantor"}, hereby irrevocably offers to d~dicate to the City of Temecula (" Grantee"), together vith the' right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for ?aintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries ~f that certain real taroperry located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in ixhibit "A" a~ache~ hereto, which is incorporated heroin by this reference {the 'Easement Area"). "C~%~NTOR RESERVES THOS~ CERTAIN RIGHTS DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT ','B" ATTACHED HERETO." f GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to naintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all ;ovenants and agreements of this easement e ending to an becoming obligations of ~dministrators, successors and assigns of the G A _ . GRANTOR DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On before me, the undersigned , A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally · personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of appeared satisfactorY evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized .capacity(lea), and that by his/her/their s'ignatu.'6(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the errdry upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.. WITNESS my hand and official seat- Signature CEBT1FICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to cerdf'y that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of T~: rr. ecuta, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accept~ by order of the City Council the date below ~ne Grantee consenT~ to the r~cord~don thereof by its duly autho~7-~l officer. June S. Greek, City C_Jerk 013162 ,,.,f[ ~ATA r ~NO. BEA~ING L1 NO~'3G'l12'W L2 NO~'OG'l14'W DISTAMGE G.OO' G.OO' CUI~VE DATA NO. I~ADIU5 DELTA AI~G C~, 532B.12' OO'2q'S&' 4G.44' C2 5322.3,2' OO'2=1'58. 4G.3q' '~' MAP VICINITY NO SCALE o % .,,, ..-,3 INDICA'I'~,.S LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCEE EASEMENT IN I:=AVOI2 OF TCSD WITI--IIN PUBLIC ;21GI-IT-OF-WAY (PAI~CEL "A' - 0,038 AC.) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT A PORTION OF LOT "A" OF TRACT N0. 23267 RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 29-35 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER "EXHIBIT PARCEL "A" - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT PORTION OF LOT "A" OF TRACT NO. 25267. IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240. RAGES 29 THROUGH 55 OF MAPS. IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER QF LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 26861-1, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 256, PAGES 25 THROUGH 27 OF MAPS. AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER. OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT 25267: THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A". SOUTH 80°55'46" WEST 228.64 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 5528.12 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY: THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°29'58.. A DISTANCE OF 46.44 FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAiD LOT "A". ON A LINE RADIAL TO SAID CURVE. SOUTH 09°56'12" EAST 6.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 5322.12 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID RADIAL LINE: THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°29'58" A DISTANCE OF 46.59 FEET: THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 80°55'46" EAST 228.64 FEET: THENCE NORTH 09°06'14" WEST 6.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAiD PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.038 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS. RIGHTS. RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. EXHIBIT "B" TO IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Grantor hereby reserves for itself and VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation ("Association") the right, but not the obligation, to plant flowering plants within the Easement Area. The party who exercises this right shell be responsible for the maintenance of the flowering plants and their removal or replacement when appropriate or at such tim~ as the Grantee requests removal. Grantee shall have no obligation to maintain, remove or replace any plants placed in the Easement Area by Grantor's or the Assoctation's exercise of this right. Recording Requested By and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). Parcel: Tract No. 23267-2 Lots 1 through 7 Project: Old Vail Ranch IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, BRIDLE- VALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation ("Transferor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the CITY OF TEMECULA ("Transfer- ee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibits "A" and "C" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). There is no Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Parcel B described on Exhibits "A" and "C" is within the public right of way and not covered by this Offer to Dedicate. This Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate is intended to transfer easements transferred to TRANSFEROR by Deed of Landscape Easement recorded November 12, 1993 as Instrument No. 452039, Official Records of Riverside County, California. If TRANSFEREE or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of TRANSFEROR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the TRANSFEROR. DATED:'~ec~,,--~e-<' ~, ~ci.1 BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit CorPoration., _ ..~___~ Title ' ~j2y~_ 11/29/93 (24) -1- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) ss. ) On/2-/c/~Z~ , before me, ~/~ · ~J ~ , Notary Public, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. i nat re ) ~ ,.~. N,~.NCY J. WEBB ._'~ ~CR ~ 4 (Seal) CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Transferee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. DATED: June S. Greek, City Clerk 11/29/93 (23} -2- "EXHIBIT "A" RECEIVED LCR4 ..-~:)1 HtP, Y 3 1994 PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT OrrfOF-,n'~}~UlA ENG~NEE~INGQE RTTMENT THOSE PORTIONS Off LOTS Z THROUGH 7 OF TRACT NO, 23267-2, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 237, PAGES 63 THROUGH 6~ OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 14 OF TRACT NO. 23267-2, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE Or LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT NO. 25267-21 THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLy LINE OF SAID LOTS 1 THROUGH 7 OF SAID TRACT, SOUTH 36'14'37" EAST 421.5B FEET TD THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 56'14'57" 2i.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1167.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17'50'45" A DISTANCE OF 565.47 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, NORTH 7~'27'20" EAST 56.24 FEET~ THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, NORTH 33'00'C)0" EAST 51.60 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 1; NORTH 52'55'47" WEST 70.i3 FEETI THENCE NORTH 4B'19'23" WEST llB.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 42'05'i6" WEST 2C)2.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE DF SAID LOT 7 OF SAID TRACTI THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLy LINE, SOUTH 47'40'00" WEST 72.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.715 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS A AND B OF TRACT NO. 23267-2, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULAm COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 237, PAGES 65 THROUGH 69 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 14 OF TRACT NO. 25267-2, SAID PDI'NT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE Or LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT NO. 25267-2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLy LINE OF SAID LOTS 1 THROUGH 14 OF SAID TRACT, SOUTH 56'i4'57" EAST 421.58 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 56'14'57" 21.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A I1~7.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLyi THENCE SOUTHEASTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF i7'50'45" A DISTANCE OF 565.47 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, NORTH 79'27°20" EAST 56.24 FEET, TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT "B" OF SAID TRACT NO. 25267-2; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, NORTH 55'00'00" EAST 51.6o FEETI THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT "B", SOUTH 52'55'47" 6.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55'00'00" WEST 51.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 79'27'20" EAST 44.94 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC A ii75.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLYI THENCE NORTHWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17'50'45" A DISTANCE OF 565.54 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 56'14'17- 21.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47'40'00" EAST 6.03 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.064 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTSm RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, AND EAS~ RECORD. 17 J3 SCALE:: N 1'-100' ',,, Jo 7 6 3 LINE DATA NO. BEARING L1 N52'53'47"W L2 N33'OO'OO"E L3 N79"27'20"E L4 N36'14'37"W L5 N52°53'47"W L6 N33'OO'OO"E L7 N79'27'20"E L8 NIB ' 1 ~' 37 ' ~ Lg N47'40'00~E VICINITY MAP DISTANCE 70.13' 51.60' 36.24' 21.73' 6.02' 51.17' 44.94' 21.Og' 6.03' LEGEND Viiii::::::::::::~ I ND I GATES LANDSCAPE MA I NTENANCE EASEMENT I N FAVOR OF T.C.S.D. (PARCEL "A" = 0.715 AC. ) I ND I GATES LANDSCAPE MA I NTENANCE EASEMENT I N FAVOR OF T.C.S.D. (PARCEL "B" = 0.064 AC.) ,.ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 7 AND LOTS "A" AND "B" OF TRACT NO. 23267-2, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 237, p,,r. Tc ,~ T~D. OU~u R~ 0~' MAOS. IN THE Recording Requested By and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecuta, California 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). Parcel: Tract No. 23267-2 Lots 8 through 14 Project: Old Vail Ranch IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, BRIDLE- VALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation ("Transferor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the CITYOF TEMECULA ("Transfer- ee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibits "A" and "C" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). There is no Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Parcel B described on Exhibits "A" and "C" is within the public right of way and not covered by this Offer to Dedicate. This Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate is intended to transfer easements transferred to TRANSFEROR by Deed of Landscape Easement recorded November 12, 1993 as Instrument No. 452040, Official Records of Riverside County, California. If TRANSFEREE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of TRANSFEROR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the TRANSFEROR. DATED: }'~ece-~r [~, Icicle/ BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Ccrporation//~~~ By Title ~~ 11/29/93 (23) - 1 - STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) Signature On/2-/y-~Z.~ , before me, ·/_,d2,~ , Notary Public, personally appeared(~h6k_ '~)'2, ~~_~~ t' ~Z~Q ~~ personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. (Seal) CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Transferee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. DATED: June S. Greek, City Clerk 11/29/93 (16) -2- "EXHIBIT "A" 1994 CrrYOF;'B4E~CULA PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 8 THROUGH 14 OF TRACT NO. 25267-2, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 237, PAGES 63 THROUGH 69 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER Of 'LOT 14 Of TRACT NO. 2~267-2m SAID POINT ALSO BEING DN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT NO. 23267-2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 8 THROUGH 14, SOUTH 36'14'37" EAST 42i.58 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, NORTH 47'40'00" 72.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 42'05'16" WEST 100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 39'47'5i" WEST 50.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44'42'52" WEST 50.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40'02'08" WEST 111.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 26'48'50" WEST 28.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23'54'02" WEST 2B.il FEET; THENCE NORTH 08'47'01" WEST 28.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02'13'i6" EAST 28.16 TO A POINT DN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 14 OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 14, NORTH 80'7'28" WEST 2.48 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 14; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 53'45'25" WEST 85.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.549 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT "A" OF TRACT NO. 23267-2, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSI.DE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 237, PAGES 63 THROUGH 69 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 14 OF TRACT NO. 25267-2, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT NO. 25267-2; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", SOUTH 36°14'37.. EAST 42i.58 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 47'40'00" WEST 6.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56'14'57" WEST 422.22 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55'45'23" EAST 6.00 FEET. SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.058 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. 17 N47'40'00" 6.03' LINE DATA NO. BEARING L1 NB0'37'28"W L2 N02'13'16"E L3 N08'47'01rW L4 N23'54'02"W L5 N26'48'30"W L6 N44'42'52"W L7 N39'47'51"W DISTANCE 2.48' 28.16' 28.23' 28.11' 28.17' 50.03' 50.05' ,~, SITE VICINITY MAP LEGEND J::::::::::::::::::J SCALE: N 1'""100' 7 8 4 3 INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF T.C.S.D. (PARCEL A = 0.549) INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF T.C.S.D. WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (PARCEL B = O.O~DAC.) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PORTION OF LOTS 8 THROUGH 14 OF TRACT NO. 23267-2, AS RECORDED Recording Requested By and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt, Code 6103). Parcel: Tract No. 23267-3 Lot 208 Project: Old Vail Ranch IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, BRIDLE- VALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation ("Transferor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the CITY OF TEMECULA ("Transfer- ee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibits "A" and "C" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). There is no Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Parcel B described on Exhibits "A" and "C" is within the public right of way and not covered by this Offer to Dedicate. This Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate is intended to transfer easements transferred to TRANSFEROR by Deed of Landscape Easement recorded November 12, 1993 as Instrument No. 452041, Official Records of Riverside County, California. If TRANSFEREE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of TRANSFEROR,' with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the TRANSFEROR. DATED: '~ec~-,-~_.~ ILl, I<~ci~ BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Co..rpor~tio~_.,,.~ " Title ~~~~ !1t29/93 [t6~ ,1_ ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250 Temecula, California 92390 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT TRACT NO. 229]5-] October 15, 1990 JN 24870-M7 Page 1 of 3 PARCEL I That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 48 through 56, 89, 90, 91, 94, 95, "A" and "B" of Tract No. 22915-1 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 217, Pages 41 through 50 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point an the northwesterly line of said Lot 95 distant thereon South 69°08~00'' West 40.50 feet from the northwesterly corner thereof; thence South 20°52'00" East 30.92 feet; thence South 66°50'49" West 276.88 feet; thence South 31°53'52'' West 11.86 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 91; thence'South 66°23~54'' West 216.19 feet; thence South 49°23'54'' West 25.00 feet; thence South 68°07~40'' West 65.17 feet; thence South 9°08'34'' West 71.83 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve on the northeasterly line of said Lot 56, said point being on a curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 1600.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 24°06'29" East; thence along said curve southwesterly 311.94 feet through a central angle of 11°10'13'' to a point of compound curvature with a curve concave easterly and having a radius of 35.00 feet, a radial line of said curves from said point bears South 35°16'43" East; thence along said curve southerly 61.11 feet through a central angle of 100°02'12"; Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates CSD Landscape Maintenance Easement Tract No. 22915-1 October 15, lggO JN 24870-M7 Page 2 of 3 thence tangent from said curve South 45'18'54" East 146.35 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 2000.00 feet; thence along said curve southeasterly 314.04 feet through a central angle of 8'59'47"; thence non-tangent from said curve South 54'51'55" West 50.67 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southwesterly, having a radius of 1244.00 feet and being concentric with and 6.00 feet southwesterly from the northeasterly line of said Lot "B", a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 54°51'55" West; thence along said concentric curve 'horthwesterly 491.92 feet through a central angle of 22°3g'23"; thence radially from said curve North 32'12'31" East 6.00 feet to said northeasterly line; thence North 1°25'29" West 138.61 feet to a point on a curve in the southeasterly line of said Lot "A" concave southeasterly and having a radius of 1156.00 feet; thence radially from said curve North 44°00'00'' West 6.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southeasterly, having a radius of 1162.00 feet and being concentric with and 6.00 feet northwesterly from said curve in the southeasterly line, a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 44°00'00,, East; thence along said concentric curve northeasterly 469.16 feet through a central angle of 23°08~00'' to a line Parallel'with-and 6.00 feet northwesterly from said southeasterly line;. thence along said parallel line North 69°08'00,, East 545.11 feet; thence South 20°52'00" East 6.00 fet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 2.62 Acres, more or less. PARCEL 2 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 2 through 12 and "A" of Tract No. 22915-1 as shown-on a map thereof filed in Book 217, Pages 41 through 49 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates CSD Landscape Maintenance Easement Tract No. 22915-1 October 15, 1990 JN 24870-M7 Page 3 of 3 BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 2; thence North 20°52~00'' West 6.00 feet to a line parallel and/or concentric with and 6.00 feet northwesterly from the southeasterly line of said Lot "A"; thence along said parallel and/or concentric line through the following courses: North 69'08~00" East 71.79 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 1162.00 feet; thence along said curve northeasterly 333.62 feet through a central angle of 16°27'00"; thence tangent from said curve Nonth 85°35'00'' East 367.96 feet to the easterly line of said Lot "A"; thence leaving said parallel and/or concentric line, along said easterly line South 4°25~00'' East 6.00 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Lot 12; thence along the northeasterly line of said Lot 12 South 4'25~00'' East 18.71 feet; thence North 75°06'34'' West 23.31 feet to a line parallel with and 11.00 feet southeasterly from said southeasterly line of Lot "A"; thence along said parallel line South 85°35'00" West 240.54 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southerly and having a radius of 1750.00 feet; thence along said curve westerly 500.62 feet through a central angle of 16°23'26'' to the southwesterly line of said Lot 2; thence North 32°48'38" West 16.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.37 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record. EXHIBIT "B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. , L.S. 3527 Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 TR.A CT NO, Z7 PAR eEL ~ S7 EXHIBIT 2,/7 C, 8. D,/ANDSCAPE MAINTENAN&E EASEMENT TRACT NO ttglS-I SHEET ! 0 F ! $HEET ~tt ~B~i~t, q~illiam cl:}bst ~a~e_~ssoci~tts 0 PR FESSI~AL E~INEERS. P~NNERS & SURVEYORS 287~O~DRIVE,SUITE~- TEMECU~ ,CA~ 0~ 15 ,1~$0 (714) 67S~'F~(714)67~72~ ~ Z~7~ iecorded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Ter ula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103}. IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: Portion of No. 22915-2 Lot 1 and "B" Project: Vintage Hills FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Philip G. Boshart and Charlotte A. Boshart husband and wife as joint tenants ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right:of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, .become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending t and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, GRANTOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On LI,~ ,'~ 't~ tO> tC~i/' before me, the undersigned, A ota '~, Public in and for the Sta~:e of California, personally 2_ N r appeared t-%~,),.~ 'C~ ~*Ahnc'F-; O~cir"JJfe a ~.~:.h'V'lC, !s~se~Jy known to me (or prove~ to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to b~ ' e the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and. that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL LAURA L O'HARA Nr~p/Puffic--Ca~0trla ORANGE COUNTY My C~mm. E~mm~ AUG01,1995 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. DBI June S. Greek, City Clerk 3ctormm ,trcv cemm~ 013192 ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250 Temecula, California 92590 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION CSD - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT TRACT NO. 22915-2 LOT 1 February 18, 1992 JN 24870-M10 Page 1 of 2 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 1 and "B" of Tract No. 22915-2 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 217, Pages 51 through 59 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence along the southeasterly line of said lot South 69°20~00'' West 35.04 feet to an angle point therein; thence North 71°13~25'' West 48.12 feet to a point on, a non-tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 1254.00 feet and being concentric with and 10.00 feet southerly from a curve in the northerly line of said lot having a radius of 1244.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 18°09~11'' West; ' thence along said curve westerly 90.08 feet through a central angle of 4°06~57"; thence radially from said curve North 14°02~14'' West 16.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 1238.00 feet and being concentric with and 6.00 feet northerly from said curve in the northerly line of Lot 1; thence along said concentric curve easterly 144.13 feet through a central angle of 6°40~14"; thence radially from said curve South 20°42~28'' East 6.00 feet to the most northerly corner of said Lot 1; Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates CSD - Landscape Maintenance Easement Tract No. 22915-2 Lot 1 February 18, 1992 JN 24870-M10 Page 2 of 2 thence along the northeasterly line 'of.said lot South 43°10'00'' East 42.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.09 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 X 30' VISTA 75-7g RDAD L= 144.13' 7-D, ,, ,"7' NO'> 22915-2 , , ~/'4k, , , --. % ~ 3ZD °42 'Z~ "E · ~. ~0' ,¢¢.,_r.~. 2!7 I 51-59 i ,'3 EXHIBIT 'B ' ~ SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION C.S.D. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEME,,'.IT TRACT NO. 22915-2 LOT I DA. TE ~'EzS'. /8 , SCALE I''= 4D' 3HEET I OF I SHEET ct~qben cBeitt, cWilliam cFfost C& c,~ssociate_s PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYOR" 28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE · SUITE 250 · TEMECULA. CA 92390 (7141 676-8042 · FAX'{714) 676-7240 FIELD BOOK JOB NO 24870 -A41D Recorded at request of and return to: City Clerks DeDartment City of Temecula / 74 Business Park Drive acula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: Tract ~22915-2 Lots 19, 20 and Lo~s 20- 30 and Lots 52-55 Project: Vintage Hills FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, · Tayco, a California Ceneral Partnership ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing ecluipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit 'A" atzached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference {the "Easement Area"). !f GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. SIGNATURE OF GRANTOR: .... CO, a California general partnership By: Cosrain Homes, Inc., a Delaware corporati a genfra/~~ By :~ '~ By: Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California corporation,'a general partner STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIV=R~;In= On L~ -~,~-~D-- before me, the undersigned , A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared ~.e'~_Ti~z,-r_z-,~- ~; ('~-~F C.~-~v~., personally known to me (or provcd to mc ¢n tl,e basis of sat;sfautur vidr~l,~6) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that 4=~,z~,J~s/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by -l=~,J,b~r/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ~ < ~ CHERYL THIEL o ARY PUB. LIC- CALIFORNIA t N :O~ENCE COUNt' M~ m. xD~esjune 7. 1994 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On ~{,'~,/7_2, {~qZ__ before me, the undersigned , A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared ~U/~ ~. E~G~'t ~(~Y~-H ~ '~,A~-~ , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the erson(s) whose name(s) is/i~ubscribed to the within instrument and acknowied ed to me that he/she~ executed the same in his/her~authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her~' signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. > :~, UNDA M. SMITH ~ _.-~-,=! :~ Notary PuMc-Callfornla ,-"':~ '~ -:: ORANGE COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is ~o certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecuta, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer, Da~e June S. Greek, City Clerk ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250 Temecula, California 92590 Revised April 6, 1992 October 15, 1990 JN 24870-M8 Page 1 of 3 CSD LEGAL DESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT TRACT NO. 22915-2 PARCEL I That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 19, 20 and "B" of Tract No. 22915-2 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 217, Pages 51 through 59 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of Lot 1 of said tract, being a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 19; thence along said southwesterly line North 43°10'00'' West 42.60 feet to the most westerly corner of said lot; thence North 20°42'28'' West 6.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 1238.00 feet and being concentric with and 6.00 feet.northerly from a curve in the northerly line of said lot having a radius of 1244.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 20°42'28" West; thence along a line parallel and/or concentric with said northerly line through the following courses: along said curve easterly 91.08 feet through a central angle of 4°12'55"; thence tangent from said curve North 65°04'37'' East 77.42 feet; thence leaving said parallel and/or concentric line, South 24°55'23'' East 31.10 feet; thence South 60°39'57'' West 155.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.14 acres, more or less. Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates CSD - Landscape Maintenance Easement 'Tract No. 22915-2 Revised April 6, 1992 October 15. 1990 JN 24870-M8 Page 2 of 3 PARCEL 2 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 20 through 30, 52 through 55 and "A" of Tract No. 22915-2 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 217, Pages 51 through 59 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of said Lot 55; thence along the southerly line of said lot North 84'24'00" West 99.63 feet to an angle point therein; thence continuing along said south6~ly line South 73'15'00" West 4.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 15.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 22'35'49" West; thence along said curve northeasterly 15.17 feet through a central angle of 57'56~41'' to a point of compound curvature with a curve concave westerly and having a radius of 780.00 feet, a radial line of said curves from said point bears North 80°32'30" West; thence along said curve northerly 295.58 feet through a central angle of 21°42,44,,; thence non-tangent from said curve North 28'32'39" West 14.68 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 53; thence North 9°45'22'' West 68.56 feet; thence North 0'13'21" West.24.95 feet; thence North 18'39'52" West 106.11 feet; thence North 25'35'52" West 459.67 feet; thence North 25'04'24" West 101.59 feet; thence North 28°41'27'' West 51.13 feet; thence North 61°29'03'' East 26.36 feet to a line parallel and/or concentric with and 6.00 feet northeasterly from the southwesterly line of said Lot "A"; thence along said parallel and/or concentric line through the following courses: South 28'30'57" East 611.62 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave westerly and having a radius of 951.00 feet; Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates CSD - Landscape Maintenance Easement Tract No. 22915-2 Revised April 6, 1992 October 15, 1990 JN 24870-M8 Page 3 of 3 thence along said curve southerly 566.26 feet through a central angle of 34°06' 57"; thence leaving said parallel and/or concentric line, radially from said curve North 84°24'00'' West 6.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 1.60 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record. EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. //~!]c'x~'~''~'T''''>''~:=' '\\ Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 RANCHO &7 Z 4 4 ~ASANA ~r ..m" I 5,~/ EXHIBIT "~ ~r C. S.D. / ,4NDSC,4P~' Ad,4/NTSNANTE ,B~beR cBeirL, cWilHam cF~st ~c~ssociates PBO~ESSIONAL ~NGIN~S. 9~NN~S a SUrVeYOrS ~ 28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE. SUITE 250. TE~E~ULA . CA 923~ 3~EET / OF I SHEETREVISED 4 '~-9~ 0C~ 15, I~ ~,,,~e~s-~-~x~,,}eTs.n,o ~ Z4~7~- ~ ~ City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Ten~cula, CA 92590 FR~,- RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: Project: Tract #22915-3 Lots 1 through 5, "A" and "B" Vintage Hills FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Tayco, a California General Partnership ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, prier notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of t,~ ~ R ~ FIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT - "ALL IN ONE" State of California On bl~,'-ch iC, fc~ Z- before me, a Notary Public in and for the (date) County of ~'r' ~ ,~'~ C, State of California, personally appeared (name'oF ~'erson or persons) ~ersonally known to me, or ~ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in ' ................... ' ~her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by ~er/their signa- :: ~ OFFICIAL~TARyS~L ~ ture(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of ~ ~g~ L O'HARA ' ~=-~. " which the person(s) ac~, execmed the ' '~NGE~U~ ~SS my hand arid o'ffic~seal. No[arv Sea]: (~ ~ ( h~ ' ....... ; .................... ~o[ary's SiEnalure This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Pat June S. Greek, City Clerk 0131b ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250 Temecul a, California 92390 October 15, 1990 JN 24870-M9 Page 1 of 2 CSD LEGAL DESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AND WATERLINE EASEMENT TRACT NO. 22915-3 PARCEL I - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 1 through 5 and "A" of Tract No. 22915-3 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 217, Pages 60 through 66 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most southerly (orner of said Lot 5; thence along the southeasterly line of said Lot "A" South 78°00'00'' West 6.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southwesterly, having a radius of 1244.00 feet and being concentric with and 6.00 feet southwesterly from the northeasterly line of said Lot "A", a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 78'00'00" West; thence along said concentric curve northwesterly 325.67 feet through a central angle of 14°59'58'' to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "B"; thence radially from said curve North 63'00'02" East 20.58 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 1300.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 58'21'29" West; thence along said curve southeasterly 335.83 feet through a central angle of 14°48'05" to the southerly line of said Lot 5; thence along said southerly line South 78°00'00'' West 42.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.26 Acres, more or less. Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates CSD - Landscape Maintenance and Waterline Easement Tract No. 22915-3 October 15, 1990 JN 24870-M9 Page 2 of 2 PARCEL 2 - WATERLINE EASEMENT That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 1, "A" and "B" of Tract No. 22915-3 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 217, Pages 60 through 66 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, included within a strip of land 4.00 feet in width, the westerly line of which is described as follows: BEGINNING at the hereinbefore described Point "B", said point being on a non- tangent curve concave southeasterly, having a radius of 1244.00 feet and being concentric with and 6.00 feet southwesterly from the northeasterly line of said Lot "A", a radial line of said cur~e from said point bears South 63'00'02" West; thence along said curve northwesterly 20.43 feet through a central- angle of 0°56'27"; thence non-tangent from said curve North 15°49~17'' East 40.12 feet to a line parallel with and 4.00 feet northwesterly from the northwesterly line of said Lot 1; thence along said parallel line North 59°35~00'' East 15.00 feet to the POINT OF TERMINATION. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record. EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 It /~ ~ ~ 31 PARCEL --.~..y,.---~PARCEL / "'/' PA RKHfA Y' EXHIBIT t. $.D. LANDSCAPE A4AINTEtIAAICE EASEMENT TRACT SHEET ! OF i SHEET ~ c'BeitL,qaSlliam ct%~t ~,c,~ssociat<~ ROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, ~NNERS & SURVEYORS P T 287~ S~ O~ DRI~ · ~ITE ~ · E M ECULA , CA ~ (714) 676~ · F~ (714) 6~72~ OC~ 15,1~ ~N. Z~B70 April 6, 1994 Mr. Shawn Nelson Community Services Director City of Temecula 43180 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 RANCHO HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Dear Shawn: Enclosed are copies of irrevocable offers of dedication executed by the Board for the maintenance of the perimeter slopes of the above referenced association. Also enclosed are copies of minutes reflecting the Board's action on accepting tract 21760 as a part of the Association and declarations of annexation recorded by the developer. As stated in our letter dated February 18, 1994, we are requesting that the TCSD include this tract in the tax assessment rolls for landscape maintenance of slope area S-3/Zone C. We hope this documentation is adequate to process this request. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (909) 699-1220. Sincere , Elite Community Management For RANCHO HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION cc: Tom Nelson, Director SK/s 11717 Bernardo Plaza Ct., Suite 205 San Diego, CA 92128 Business: (619) 485-0881 · Service: (619) 485-0672 FAX: (619) 485-7844 27710 Jefferson Ave., Suite 106 Temecula, CA 92590 Business: (909) 699-1220 · Accounting: (909) 699-4225 FAX: (909) 699o1661 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Rancho Highlands Community Association (hereinafter, "the Board") is charged with the responsibility for the administration and management of the affairs of the association; and WHEREAS, the Board is granted the authority to convey easements belonging to the Association to the County Service Area #143, pursuant to Article V of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of Rancho Highlands Community Association (hereinafter "CC&Rs); and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, California, is the successor- in-interest to the County Service Area #143; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Highlands Community Association desires to dedicate to the City of Temecula, California, easements for the purpose of maintaining, operating, altering, repairing and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within that certain real property described as Parcels 2, 6 and 7 in Exhibit C to the CC&Rs and as described as Parcel 2 of Exhibit "A" in the "Declaration of Annexation for Rancho Highlands - Tract 22203" recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside County on May 4, 1988 as Document Number 118968 and as described in the "Irrevocable Offers To Dedicate" attached to this resolution, marked Exhibits "A" and. "B" and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Board has the authority to dedicate the real property described in Exhibits "A" and "B" to the City of Temecula, California, under Article V of the CC&Rs; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Rancho Highlands Community Association hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula, California, easements and rights-of-way over real property, described in Exhibits "A" and "B" to this resolution, for the purpose of maintaining, operating, altering, repairing and. replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of the easements described in Exhibits "A" and "B". The foregoing resolution of Rancho Highlands Community Association was passed by the Board of Directors of Rancho Highlands Community Association at its meeting held on of the Board of Directors C: \CLIENTS4\7030.01 \DEEDRESO .D21 · State of California County of San Diego a o a~ P'/b"lic for , before me, , the State of California, persona/l~ appeared , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. // ' (signature) C: \CLIENTS4\7030.01%DEED RESO. D21 RANCHO :HIGHLANDS · COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION · =REGULAR:MEETING OF'TIlE .BOARD 'OF DIRECTORS' .... .: ...!:.::. =..= :. i=.:..::: . :..!=..::=:=: .. · 2 . . -i: ' '::: " . . =.: .::. :: '~ '..'Minutes :.-.:: , - . . · . · ... : March 22, 1994 : -:: .:. ';~:=: · Bill Cecil, President; Sharon Bonavries; Vice-President; Leo Le Blanc, Treasurer; Ethel Imel, Director; Tom Nelson, Director; Brenda Griffin and Shari.Kuwahara, Representing Elite Community Management; Several Homeowners'. Absent: None. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 6:45 p.m. 'by. Mr.. BitFCecil, President.and was adjoumed tc Executive Session for the purpose of conducting rules violation hearings. Open Session was reconvened:at 7:00 p.m. by Mr. Bill Cecil, President. The Board. on motion, second and vote unanunously r%oular meeting as submitted. approved the minutes of the January 25, t994 FINANCIAL REPORT Financial Statement Review Mr. Le Blanc reviewed the financial statement. ending February 28, 1994 with the Board:and members present. He reviewed the account balances and budget report. Mr. Le Blanc stated 'that assessments would'resume May 1, 1994. No action was taken. MANAGEMENT REPORT ' ' ProperrS.' Inspection Report Management reviewed the latest property inspection report with the Board and audience. Management recommended that the Board authorize obtaining bids for street sweeping of the- parking area of the recreation facility. The Board directed Management to wait on this item to ....... - allow ~for further investigation.. Management was notified that only one tennis court was cleaned during the last maintenance. Management was directed to contact the contractor and find out why they are not fulfilling their contract. Rules Inspection Report Management reviewed the Rules Violation Summary with the Board of Directors. There were no · questions or comments regarding this summary. Minutes March 2.2, 1994 Page - Two - . co nrr'i's REPORTS= : :-! ... ,,-:.-.;- :,-.:. _: ! -.. :; ,;: .. Architectural Control Committee Mr. Alberts told:the Board 'thatisix,;.applieations had-:been reviewed..and approved and. that 14 parking violations had been-submitted to :Elite 'fori processing, . . Landscape Committee..:.:~;: :::" ~::::j5 ;).i!~,~:":~;~':~")j~:j:~;~::;:;:.;;:~,.j~'::; ~ ': :' -. Mr. Chichester reported to the Board that a landscape inspection had. been conducted earlier:in the month and Tetra Nova had: compteted"the requested items 'from this inspection... A turnover inspection of Lot 116 was conducted earlier this week and that there were a few items needing completion prior to the turnover. Management to ensure that written notification of the requested work to Tetra Nova. At this time, President Bill Cecil. presented plaques to Mr. Tom Nelson and Lester Del Hotel for their work during the rum over of the recrezdon facility; Mr. Del Hotal was not present and MAr. Cecil will ensure that he receives:his plaque.-. Management presented to the- Board an estimate of costs to repair the monument lights at Preece : -..': Road/Quite Meadow Entrances. After 'review, ':the Board directed Management to obtain two additional.bids and to ensure that.all bids-include the lighting at Santiago Road'. Management.was . also requested to have the existing bid rewritten as' to be readable. - - Ratify Approval of Landscape Improvements at Preece Road On motion, second and unanimous vote the Board ratified its approval of the landscape improvement at-Preece Road (tot 116) at a cost.of. $1- 600 to the Association. ' Ratify Denial of Increase in Landscape:Contract' ' ': The Board gave the menibers present the background on .the requested increase in.the landscape maintenance contract, On motion, second and.vote. the-Board ratifiedits denial:of'the requested increase in-the Landscape .,Contract, as they:: feel:the, contractor should-have'included this:in 'their original bid, as the other'bidders'hadi !:The-motionpassed:4-0-t with .Mrs, Bonavries absmining. :: .... 5- . :'5'. i' Approve Dedication oi~ Perimeter-Common Areas'tO'City'of Temecula' '., The Board discussed .with the members present' that the City of Temecula has been. maintaining the .-: ":. perimeter landscaping for.several years' andlate last year they discovered that. the legal paperwork ' ' had been lost. The Board had '.legal counsel review the'documents provided by 'the City: to ensure , that everything was in order before-signing. The Board, on motion, second and vote unanimously . approved the attached resolution ands the offers of dedication for the perimeter landscaping as listall ... on the resolution. ' ' - -. , - Acceptance of Tract 21760 5.: ~'Z : .' . :- . . The Board, on motion,. second .and vote unanimously approved the acceptance of tract 21760' into the Association. ~y~ ~lerks Department CitY of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: Project: subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. : m, OPTIONAL SECTION mmm " THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT I f.17.F. VOt_~BL~ E~FEIL To ~;~ THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: ~ OF PAGES ~ DATE OF DOCUMENT ~ it Could prevent fraudulent rea~aCbment of this form. SIG ER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ~' ~'~'~ ' ' ' ¢1992 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinmet Ave .... · ~ , '' TITLEISI EQ. pARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL · ., FRANCES F. SPURLOCK ' ~ t Notary Pubac -- CaJi/ornja ;" My i,1995~ FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDEBATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Rancho HiGhlances Community Association, a Cal&~orn&a nonpro~t mutuaZ bene~&t co=po=at~on ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to fu~her grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that ce~ain real prope~y located in the City of Temecula, Coun~ of Riverside, more pa~iculariy described in Exhibi~ "A" a~ached hereto, which is incorporated heroin by mis reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement e~ending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the G~ANTOR. ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ GRANTOR t:E j ~ CAPACITY CLAIMED .BY SIGNER ', , . inva ua e to r~ns re in on e ~umen. ~'21 / DATE ,' ' NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER- E.G., 'JAN DE, NOTARY U LIC' ~ CORPORATE OFFIC (S) personally appeared ~O~ ~ P-~5 , ~. NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S ~ personally known to me - OR - Q proved to me on the bas=s of satisfactoW evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are Exhibit A THE Easterly 15.00 feet of Lot 41 and the Westerly 15.00 feet of Lot 42 of Tract No. 20644 in the County of Riverside, State of California as shown by Map filed in Book 159, Pages 46 to 49 of Maps, Records of said County. 1 ~-~ecor~eo at reques~ o~ aria return City Clerks Department Cit, y of 'Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Tem~cula, CA 92590 FRo= RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDEL:iATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, RANCHO HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION Parcel: Lot 26 of Tract No. 20643; Lots 73 & 74 of Tract No. 20644. Project: The S,--mit at Rancho Highlands ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to.dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, aitering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County Of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attF, ched heretc.,, ,~:hich is inco:pc--=.ted h~rei:~ by +-~,: re?s.-'e~:cs '.+"-~ "=;-~-.~ ..... ?-.rsa"~. If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, a'[ter notice, become the rssponsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement e~ending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the FRANTOR. - _ AN DA. _j / STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDe: On ,. ~:.~,-~//~ z/ befode me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally apps/ared ~),//,~rr~ ;~ · e~, ~ , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of acknowledged' to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNES! my .~d and ~ Signature ~~ CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Da' June S. Greek, City Clerk 3ctformsArrev ,de~ 0131 ~2 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 1: Lot 26 of Tract No. 20643 in the County of Riverside, State of California as shown by Map filed in Book 159, Pages 50 to 53 of Maps, Office of County Recorder of said County. PARCEL 2: Lot 73 of Tract 20644 in the CoUnty of Riverside, State of California as shown by Map filed. in Book 159, Pages'46 to 49 of Maps, Records of said County. PARCEL 3: Lot 74 of Tract 20644 in the County of Riverside, State of California as shown by Map filed in Book 159, Pages 46 to 49 of Maps, Records of said County. C:XCLLENTS4\7030.01 \DEEDRF.,SO.D21 RecordeEl at request of and return to: City ClerkS- Department Cit" - * ~'emecula 43 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Go~. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, RANCHO HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION Parcel: Lot 31 of Tract No. 22203. Project: (Remapped from Tract No. 20642) The S,,mmj t at Rancho Highlands (" Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to 'dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee "), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, uperating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, mor6 particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached h~reto.. whici~ is inco:porated heroin by thie reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successori or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANh'OR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the G~,ANTOR. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On ~~.9 z_/ befort me, the undersigned A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appe 'red //~,//t,:~.,,.~. t'1. ~4, / ' a · , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacffy(ies), and that by his/her/~heir signature(s) on the instrument the per3on(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Tem~'ula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below ant Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date June S. Greek, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 1: LOt 31 Of Tract 22203 in the County of Riverside, State of California as shown by Map filed in Book 177, Pages 95 to 99 of Maps, Records of said County. C:\CLIENTS4\7030.0] \DEEDRESO. D21 STATE OF CAL;FORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO , before me, "'7,,' Notary Pubno. personaHy appe~ed C~_/k_ ~ ~ ~~ > personally known to me (or proved to me on ~he basis of satisfactory evidence) to be ~he person(s) whose name(s) is~ore subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shel~hey executed ~he same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and tl~t by his/her/their s~nature(s) on ~he instrument, the persOn(s), or the entity upon behalf of which NOTARY PUBLIC. C&SF0q~ ', S~ D.~GO COUN~ (Seal) CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation aqd/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Transferee consents to the recordation thereof by its du',y authorized officer. DATED: June S. Greek, City Clerk RECEIVED " MAY 3 1994 ' CrI~tOFI'BqECULA EN'r ENGINEERING "EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF LOT 208 OF TRACT NO. 23267-3, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 20 THROUGH 28 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 208 OF TRACT NO. 23267-3, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT "H" OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 208, NORTH 36'14'37" WEST 85.21 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 208; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 208, NORTH 03°13'43.. EAST 22.02 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, NORTH 53'43'15" EAST 1.03 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 208, SOUTH 09'14'07" EAST 20.27 FEET; THENCF SOUTH 34°28'59.. EAST 83.19 FEET TO A POINT OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 208; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 53'45'23" WEST 3.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.010 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS "A" AND "H" OF TRACT NO. 23267-3, IN THE CiTY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 20 THROUGH 28 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 208 OF TRACT NO. 23267-3, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT "H" OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "H", NORTH 36°14'37" WEST 85.21 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 208, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", NORTH 03°13'44'' EAST 22.02; THENCE NORTH 53'43'15" EAST 1.03 FEET; THENCE I,KAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", NORTH 36'18'51" WEST 6.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53°49'09.. WEST 3.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03'13'44" WEST 27.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 36'14'37" EAST 87.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 53'45'23" 6.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.016 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. LINE DATA NO. BEARING DISTANCE L1, N53'43'lS"E 1.03' L2 N0c1'3.4 '07 'W 20.27' · L3 N34'Z~5'ScI'W L4 N53'45'Z3°E 3.24' L5 N3G'~,4 '37"W LG NO3'13'43'E 22.02' L7 N3G'lS'Dl'W G.OO' L8 N53'4q'Oq'E Lc~ HO3'13'44'E 27.01_' U,O N3G'~-4'37 'W 87.3G' l~, ND3'45'Z3 'E G.OO' INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT IN FAVO~ OF TCSD CANCEL "A'- 0.010 INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT IN FAVOI;? Oi= TCSD WITHIN R,BLIC I~IGt-IT OF WAY (,DAI;?C~,, '~' · 0.016 AC!~ES) VICINITY MAP NO ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PORTION OF' LOT 208 OF TRACT NO. 23267-: AS RECORDED IN BOOK 240, PAGES 20 'Racor~ed at request of and return to: City Clerks Department Cit-t of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee {Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: Tract ~=-22915-1 Lots 48 through 56, 89, 90,91,94,95, "A" and "B". Lots 2 through 12 Project: Vintage Hills FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Tayco, a California General Partnership ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City o.,' Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all' covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of~~,~~ ~RANTOR This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Otter Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. June S. Greek, City Clerk ''M NO. 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY MANAGER TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT City Manager/Board of Directors Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer May 24, 1994 Fiscal Year 1994-95 Annual Operating Budget RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution 94-_ entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS AND PERSONNEL POSITIONS DISCUSSION/FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed TCSD operating budget for FY 1994- 95 includes the operation of district-wide parks and recreation facilities, as well as benefit assessment zones for street lighting, slope maintenance and waste hauling. The operating budget for the TCSD totals $5,345,486 as follows: City-Wide Parks and Recreation Service Level A (Arterial Street Lighting) Service Level B (Residential Street Lights) Service Level C (Slope Maintenance) Service Level D (Waste Hauling) 2,860,815 182,808 236,928 562,985 1,501,950 Total $ 5,345,486 The City-Wide Parks budget includes the operation and maintenance cost of all City park facilities. During FY 1993-94, 5 new parks were added to the City's park system, totaling 45 additional acres, as well as the 26,000 sq ft Temecula Community Recreation Center and the 6,000 sq ft Old Town Temecula Senior Center. A Public Hearing will be held on June 14, 1994 to discuss the proposed rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1994-95. All services provided by the TCSD are funded by fees charged to the property owners and are included on the Assessods Parcel Rolls. The following illustrates the rates as proposed in FY 1994-95, Service Level City-wide Parks & Rec. Service Level A (Arterial Street Lighting) Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) Service Level C (Slope Maintenance) C1 C2 C3 C4 Service Level D (Waste Hauling) FY 93-94 Rates FY 94-95 Rates Increase/Decrease $ 58.30 $ 64.20 ~ 3.30 ~ 4.18 $ 4.18 $ 0.00 $ 30.88 $ 26.30 $ <4,58> 50.00 $ 46.00 $ < 4.00 > 93.00 $ 89.00 $ <4,00> 120.00 $ 116.00 $ < 4.00 > 179.00 $ 175.00 $ <4.00> $ 165.00 $ 169.36 $ 4.36 Attachment: Resolution No. CSD 94-_ Adopting Operating Budget for FY 1994-95. RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-199~ FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS AND PERSONNEL POSITIONS WHEREAS, the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) has reviewed the proposed final Operating Budget for fiscal year 1994-95, and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVF~r} by the Temecula Community Services District as follows: SECTION 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula enti~ed "City of Temecula 1994-95 Annual Operating Budget," is hereby adopted. SECTION 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Head may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts up to $10,000 per transfer, with the approval of the TCSD General Manager. $10,000. action. ' C. The General Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to Any expenditure of funds in excess of $10,000 requires TCSD Board of Directors D. The Board of Directors must authorize transfers of funds from unreserved Fund Balance and transfers within departmental budget accounts of $10,000 or more. E. The Board of Directors must authorize any increase in regular personnel positions above the level included in the final budget. The Executive Director may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. Resos C-qD 09 F. Notwithstanding Section 2C, pursuant to Section 3.13.080 of the Municipal Code, the General Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require Board action, except that the General Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Board in amounts up to project contingency established by the Board. SECTION 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the TCSD books at June 30, 1994, are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for 1994-95. SECTION 4. The Board Secretary' shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District on the 24th day of May, 1994. AT'FEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, President June S. Greek City Clerk/Board Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk/Board Secretary, of the Temecula Community Services District, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting oF the Board. of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District on the 241h day of May 1994 by the following roll call vote. AYES: 0 DIRECTORS: None NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk/Board Secretary Re~sCSD ~ DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPRO'~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: Board of Directors Ronald Bradley, General Manager DATE: May 24, 1994 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: (~_ ha n w D. Nelson, Director of Community Services DISCUSSION: The bronze plaque is now ordered for the installation of a memorial for Officer Kent Hintergardt, which will be placed at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. It will take approximately 4 to 6 weeks to receive the plaque. Once received, staff will move forward with the installation. The Community Recreation Center (CRC) Pool is now open and has been greatly utilized by the community. Currently, approximately 1 O0 people have signed up for swim lessons and open swimming should be extremely successful with the new water slide at the pool. Many recreation classes, sports programs, and drop-in recreation programs are also being offered at the CRC as well. The construction of Riverton Park is now completed. The park will be dedicated to the community May 19, 1994. Staff is moving forward with the Loma Linda Park Project - Phase II. The project is currently out 'to bid, and the bid opening is scheduled for May 26, 1994 at 2:00 p.m. Staff is currently working on potential construction options concerning the Pala Community Park Project. During the past several weeks, test pumping occurred on the site to determine whether the underground water could be drawn down enough to allow equipment on the site for grading purposes. As a result of this process, it has been recommended by the soils engineer that a portion of the site can be developed using the de-watering process. Therefore, the new construction plan will be considered by the Board on June 14, 1994. Staff is currently interviewing for day camp staff to provide summer recreation programs and activities. In addition, a summer concert schedule for the outdoor amphitheater is being prepared by the Recreation Division. Staff is proceeding with the restroom facility at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. The architect's design is completed, and it is anticipated to release a public bid for construction by the end of May, 1994. r:\l\l~end~eptOOT.ldn rev:O61394kc The City Council approved $125,000 of Community Develop Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Lake Improvement Project. However, the County rejected this request because the project did not meet the criteria established by CDBG. As a result, staff will continue to pursue other funding mechanisms for this project. Construction is currently underway on the Rancho California Sports Park Slope Repair Project. This project will provide slope and channel improvements that will create the main infrastructure for the Sports Park Improvement Project. This project is expected to be completed by the end of June, 1994. r:\a~'~end~'~lePtOO?-m:ln rev:O61394kc REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD APRIL 26, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Was called to order at 9:06 PM. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter M. Thorson and Agency Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-2. The motion was unanimously carried. 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 22, 1994. 2. RDA Commercial Small Business Loan 2.1 Approve an RDA small business loan to A & K communications. AGENCY BUSINESS 3. Authorization of AGreements for ConsultinQ Services for Old Town T.Z.B.G., Inc. RedeveloDment Project Executive Director Ron Bradley presented the staff report. General Counsel Peter Thorson advised that any Member who owns property in Old Town should abstain. Agency Member Stone stepped down due to ownership in Old Town. Agency Member Mu~oz stepped down because he leases an office in Old Town. Agency Member Parks expressed concern over the expense of an EIR for a project that is not approved. Director of Planning Gary Thornhill explained that the length of time required to do an EIR would considerably delay the project if the process is not begun. RDAMIN\052694 -1- 05/12/~ Ternecula Redevelopment Agency Minutes April 26. 1994 It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Roberrs to approve staff recommendation as follows: 3.1 Authorize the Chairperson to execute an agreement with Tom Dodson and Associates not to exceed $75,800 subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to the final form of the agreement. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Agency Member Mu~oz and Stone returned at 9:15 PM. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT Mu~oz, Stone It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to adjourn at 9:16 PM to a meeting on May 10, 1994, 8:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary RDAM]N~052694 -2- 05/12/94