HomeMy WebLinkAbout91_006 PC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 91-006
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP
NO. 24038 TO SUBDIVIDE A 4.99 ACRE PARCEL INTO 3
PARCELS AT THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF MORENO ROAD
ADJACENT TO SAM HICKS PARK AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 921-070-022, 023, AND 024.
WHEREAS, Leland/Sung Development filed Parcel Map No. 24038 in accordance
with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City
has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Parcel Map application was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Parcel Map on December 3,
1990, and January 28, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Parcel Map;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes
the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated
city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation.
During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a
general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be
consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of
the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking
other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the
following:
(a)
There is a reasonable probability that the land use or
action proposed will be consistent with the general
plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general
plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
R:XkaulXPC Resolution 91-006.dcc
(c)
The proposed use or action complied with all other
applicable requirements of state law and local
ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest
Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation
of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County,
including the area now witt~in the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has
adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a
timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP and meets
the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of
the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits,
pursuant to this title, each of the following:
(a)
There is reasonable probability that Pamel Map No.
24038 proposed will be consistent with the general
plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment
to or interference with the future adopted general
plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
(c)
The proposed use or action complies with all other
applicable requirements of state law and local
ordinances.
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, no
subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made:
a)
That the proposed land division is consistent with
applicable general and specific plans.
b)
That the design or improvement of the proposed land.
division is consistent with applicable general and
specific plans.
c)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the type of development.
d)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the proposed density of the
development.
R:~kaul~C Resolution 91-006.doc
2
e)
That the design of the proposed land division or
proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially
and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
f)
That the design of the proposed land division or the
type of improvements are not likely to cause serious
public health problems.
g)
That the design of the proposed land division or the
type of improvements will not conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for
access through, or use of, property within the
proposed land division. -A land division may be
approved if it is found that alternate easements for
access or for use will be provided and that they will
be substantially equivalent to ones previously
acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply
only to easements of record or to easements
established by judgment of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
(2) The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the
proposed Tentative Parcel Map, makes the following findings, to wit:
a) The proposed division is consistent with the
Southwest Area Plan and Zoning Code.
There is no minimum lot size in the
commercial zone, and the area is identified
by SWAP as commercial.
b)
The lot design is logical and meets the approval of
the City's Planning and Engineering Departments.
The lot design facilitates parking, access, and
site design.
c)
The legal owner of record has offered to make all
dedications required.
Conditions of Approval require dedication
prior to final map recordation.
d)
The project will not have a significant adverse affect
on the environment. A Negative Declaration is
recommended and all impacts will be reduced to
insignificant levels through recommended conditions
of approval.
R:~kau|~PC Resolution 91-006.doc
3
An Initial Study was prepared including
mitigation which will alleviate all impacts.
e)
There is a reasonable probability that the project will
be consistent with the City's General Plan once
adopted, based on analysis contained in the Staff
Report.
The surrounding area currently supports
commercial projects, and is identified by
SWAP as commercial.
f)
There is not a likely probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future General
Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent
with the plan.
If the proposed use is inconsistent, it will not
be detrimental because of the commercial
nature of surrounding uses.
g)
The project as proposed provides adequate
provisions for future passive or natural solar heating
or cooling opportunities.
A. All three (3) proposed parcels include
sufficient southern exposure.
h)
That said findings are supported by minutes, maps,
exhibits and environmental documents associated
with these applications and herein incorporated by
reference.
This Staff Report contains mapping,
Conditions of Approval, and an Initial Study
which support the Staff recommendation.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Parcel Map is
compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed
project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been
added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
R:~kaulXl'C Resolution 91-006.doc
4
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Parcel Map No.
24038 for the subdivision of a 4.99 acre parcel into 3 parcels located on the south side of Moreno
Road adjacent to Sam Hicks Park subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION 4.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28~ day of January 1991
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of
January, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, and
Chairman Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
R:~aul~PC Resolution 91-006.dec
5
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentaifve Parcel Map No: _24038
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of CaBforeia Subdivision Map Act and
to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless modified bY the conditions
listed below. A fime extension may be appreved in accordance with the State MaP Act and
City Ordinance, upon written request, if mode 30 days Prior to the expirefion date.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two Years after the approval date,
unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land sureeYor subject to ail the
requirements of the State of Califoreia Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance 460.
The subdivider shall submit one coPY of a soils report to the City Engineer and two copies
to the Deporb.ent of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and
geological condiifens of the site.
5. AnY delinquent property taxes shall be paid Prior to recordaifon of the final map.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract maP boundary
to a City maintained road.
All read easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force
until the geverelng body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedicalJons shall be free
from ail encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. SUeet names shall be subject to
approval of the City Engineer.
Easements, when required for roadway sloPes, drainage facilities, uiflities, etc, shall be
shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All effere of
dedicaifon and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City
Engineer.
Prior to the recordation of the i~nal Map, the following agencies shall provide written
veriflcafion to the Engtaeedng DePartment that all perdnent Conditions of approval and
applicable regulations have been met:
Planning DePartment
Temecula Valley School District
Rre Dis~ct
Engineer Deporb,,ent
STAFFRPT~PP76
10.
SSi
12.
13.
14,
· 15.
16.
County Health DePartment
Water District
Rood Contrel District
Easter MuniciPal Water DIstdcL
A copy of the final grading plan shall be submitted te the Planning DePartment for review
and approval. JUl on-site cut and fill slopes shall:
Be limited to a mavimum slope rstJo of 2 to I and a m~mum vel'deal height of
thirty [30] feet- Setbacks from top and bottem of slopes shall be a minimum of one-
half the slope heigllL
b. Be contour-graded to blend with exisUng nBteral eootours.
c. Be a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots.
JUl slopes over three [3] feet in height shall be landseaped and irrigated according to the
. City Development Code. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, prepared by a
qualified prafessional, shall be submitted to the City Planning Department fer review and
approval prior to issuance of grading permits.
The applicant shall complY with the environmental health recommendaUons ouflined in
the County fieaflh Deparlment's uansmittal dated September 25,1989, a copy of which is
attached.
The applicant shall complY with the fleod control recommendaUons outlined in the
Riverside County Rood Congol District's letter dated November 14,1989, a copy of which is
attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood conUel drainage area pursuant to
Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land DMsion Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the
construction ef area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of
Grading Permits.
The applicant shall complY with the firs improvement recommendations outlined in the
County Rte Department's letter dated November 29,1989, a copy of which is attached.
All ProPosed construcUon shall comPlY with the California Institute of Technology,
Palomar Observatory Outdoor Ughting Policy, as outJined in the Southwest Area Plan.
The applicant shall complY with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern MuniciPal
Water District transmittal dated Octeber 6,1988, a copy of which is attached.
Lots created by this subdivision shall complY with the following:
Lots created by this subdMsion shall be in conformance with the development
standards of the C-P-S)Scenic Highway Commercial) zone.
STAFFRPT~PP76
18.
19.
20.
Graded but undeveloPed land shall be maintained in a weed-fro, condition and
shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other eraslon
control measures as approved bY the Director of Building and Safety.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped
areas and irrigation systems unlfi such time as those oPerafions are the responsibilities
of other parties as approved bY the Planning ffirocter.
Prior to recordafion of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECSf shall be
prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns
and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A coPY of the ECS shaB
be transmitted te the Planning DePamnent for review and appraval. The approved ECS
shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and
the DePartment of Building and Safety.
The foBowing note shall be Placed on the Environmental Constroints Sheet-' "ibis prope~
is located within thirty [30) miles of Mount Palomar ObservatarY. All proPosed outdoor
ligbGng sYstems shall complY with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar
Observatory recommendsfion.
Paler te the issuance of GffilDING.P. EBMI~S the fsfiowing conditions shall be satisfied:
[1)
Prior te the issuance of grading permits detailed common open space area
landscaping and irrigation Plans shall be submitted for Planning Deparbnent
approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified bY a
landscape architect, and shall PrOvide for the following:
Permanent automafic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
LandscaPe screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to
a minimum height of six [6] feet at maturity.
All utJlity service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with
landscaping and decorative bard,rs or baffle t~eatmenta, as approved bY
the Planning Directer. thJlitJes shall be placed undergreund.
Parkways sball be landscaped ta pr,vide visual screening or a uansifion
into the primary use area of the site. LandscaPe elements shall include
ea~,h berming, ground cover, shrabs and specimen trees~
Wall plans shall be submitted for the Project perimeter. Wooden fencing
shall not be allowed on the perimeter of the project All lots with slopes
leading down from the lot shall be PrOvided with gates in the wail for
maintenance access.
STAFFRPT~PP76
Landscaping plans shall incorPorate the use of specimen accent trees at
key visual focal points within the projecL
22.
Landscaping plans shall incorPorate native and dreught tolerant plants
where appropriate.
All exisOng specimen trees and significant rack outcroppings on the
subject propnttY shall be shown on the Project's grading glans and shall
note those to be removed, relocated and/or ratained.
L
Ail trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing
trees shall be steel staked.
jm
Ail cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceeding
ten [10) feet in verdcal height shall be contour-graded incorPorafing the
following grading techniques:
The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted tu the
angle of the natural terrain.
Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
Tho toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii
designed in propnttion to the tetsl height of the slopes where
drainage and stability permit such rounding.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide
evidence tu the Director ef Building and Safety that all adjacent off-sHe
manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope
maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
ExistJng pine trees adjacent to the southwesterly property line of proposed
Parcel No. 3 shall remain, and shall be reflected on future proposed
landscape plans. If it is proven that it is impossible to retain the existing
trees, then final landscape plans shall indicate the replacement of trees
which are 36" box or greater.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified Paleontologist shall be retained by the
developer for consultafion and comment off the proposed grading with respect te
potential paleontological impacts. Should the Paleontologist find the potential is high for
impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeOng between the paleontologist and the
excavation and grading contracter shag be arranged. When necessarY, the Paleontulogist
or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading
acthdty tu allow recovery of fossils.
STAFFRPT~PP76
23.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents,
officer, and employees frnm any claim, aeifon, or proceeding against the City of Temeeula
er its agents, omcer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the
City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning
Tentative Parcel Map Do. 24038, which action is brought within the time period provided
for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. 111e City of Temeeula will PromPtlY
nolflY the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecofa
and wiD cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptJy noffiy the subdivider of
any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate iully in the defense, the
subdivider shall not,thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the
City of Temecula.
24,
All utility systems Including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shag be
provided for underground, with easements PrOvided as required, and designed and
cons~ucted In accordance with City Codes and the utility provided. Telephone, cable TV,
and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
25.
Within fOlly-eight [48] hours of the approval of the ProJecL the applicant/developer shall
deliver to the Planning Depallment a cashiers check or money order payable to the County
Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Twe Dollars [$1,275.00],which
includes the One Thousand, Two tiundred, RifY Dollars [$1,250.00] fee, in compliance with
AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711~1[d][2] plus file Twenty-Twe Dollar
[$25.00] County administrative fee to enable the City to file the tiotice of Determination
required under Public Besourees Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations
15075. If within such fortY-eight [48) hour Period the applicant/developer has not
delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, file aPProVal for the
project granted h. erein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code
Section 71W1[c].
Fnlline.~dn_o nP..mie~mP, nt
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of APProval for this Project, and shall be
completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the
conditions shall be referred to the Engineering DeparmlenL
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the Project to be resubmitted for further
consideration.
26.
The Developer shall comPly with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all
applicable City Ordinances and Resollltions~
27.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer,
subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
Ordinance No. 460.
STAFFRPT~PP76
PRIOR TO RNAL MAP APPROVAL:
28. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water Disl~ict;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside CountY Rood Oonl~ol district;
CitY of Temecula Rre Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside CountY Health DePartment; and
CATV F~anchise.
CalTrans
29. Moreno Road shall be dedicated to 44' from centedine on the final map.
30.
A declaration of Covenants, CondPJons and Besl~ictions (CC&fi's] shall be prepared by the
developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, CitY Engineer and City Attorney. The
CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in
the property to be developed, shall make the CitY a party thereto, and shall be enforceable
by the City. The OC&B's shall be reviewed and approved by the CitY and recorded. The
CC&It's shall be subject to the following eonditions:
a. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense.
The CC&R'S shall be in the form and content appraved bY the Director of Planning,
CitY Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include ouch previsions as are
required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the
interest of the CitY and its residents.
The CC&R's and ArUcles of Incoryoration of the ProPertY Owner's Association are
subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the CitY
Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy
shall be provided to the CitY.
da
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management,
use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and facilities`
The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and
maintained so as not to create a Public nuisance.
L
The CC&R's shall PrOvide that if the ProPerly is not maintained in the condition
required by the CC&R's, then the CitY, after maMng due demand and giving
reasonable notice, may enter the Property and perform, at the owner's sole
expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances,
The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the CitY to secure any such
STAFFRPT~PP76
expense not premptiy reimbursed.
11]e declaration shall contain language prohibiting further subdivision ef
any lots, whether they are lettered Iota or numbered Iot~
ii.
All pad[ways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently
maintained by an association or other means acceptable to the City. Such
Proof of this maintenance shad be submitted to the Planning and
Engfueeflng Divisions Prior to issuance of building permlt~
iii.
Reciprocal access easementa and maintenance agreementa including
access between Parcel Nos~ 2 and 3 as shown on Plot Plan No. 76 ensuring
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of ail roads, drives or parking
areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded
concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where
no map is involved.
31.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall dePOSit with the Engineering
Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impact~ Should the develoPer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter inta a written agreement with the City defulTing said payment
ta the time of issuance of a building permiL
PRIOR TO ISSgANCE Of CERllFICATES Of OCCUPANCY:
32.
Developer shall Pay any capital fee for road imPrevementa and public facililies imposed
upon the property or project, including that for I~affic and public facility mitJgafion as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the
time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has
not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests ita building permita
for the project or any Phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for
Payment of Public Facility Fee, a ceny of which has been Provided to Developer. Developer
understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now
estimated [assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees] and specifically
waives ita right to protest such increase.
STAFFRPT~PP76
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT
:,~a~*~o,~ttl~,.~. September 25, 1909 ~;~',:'~ -.
JAN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 9Z502
A~TN: Jeff AAams
RIVER61DE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
l~: PARCEL MAP 84038: See attached leqal description.
C3 Lot)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map
No. 24038 and recommends that:
A water system shall be installed accordinq to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prints of the plan~ of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with
the oriqina! drawing to the County Surveyor.
The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
location of valves and fire hydrants: pipe and
doint specifications,~nd the size of the main
at the ~unction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in all
respects with Oiv, $, Part 1. Chapter 7 of the
California Health and Safety Cede, California
Administrative Cede, Title Za, Chapter 16, and General
Order No, 105 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California. when applicable.
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Page Two
ATTN: Mike McCabe
September 25, 19~9
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and
water company with the following certification: "I
certify that the design of the water system in Parcel
Map 24038 is accordance with the water system expansion
plans of the Rancho California Water District
and that the water service, storage and distribution
system wil! be adequate to provide water service to
such parcel map. This certification does not constitute
a guarantee that it will supply water to such parcel
map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for
fire protection or any other purpose".This
certification shall be signed by a responsible official
of the water company.
weeks Rrior to the request for the recordation of the
This Department has a statement from Rancho California Water
District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every
lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory
financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider.
It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made
prior to the recordation of the final map.
This Department has a statement' from the Eastern Municipal
Water District a~reeing to allow the subdivisi, on sewage
system to be connected to the sewers et~ the District. The
sewer system shall be installed according to plans and
specifications as approved by the District, the County
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent p~ints of the
plans o~ the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate,
along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location o~
manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications
and the size o~ the sewers at the junction of the new system
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location
of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the
sewage plans and profiles.
Pa~e Three
ATTN: Mike McCabe
September 25, 19~9
The plans shall be signed by a registered en=ineer and the
sewer district with the following certification: "I certify
that 'the design of the sewer system in Parcel Map 24035 is
in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the
Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal
system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated
wastes from the proposed parcel map."
It 'will be necessary for financial arrangements to be
completely finalized prior to recordation of the final map.
Sincerely,
~vironmental Health Services
SM:fac
Attachment
.......... I I Ill ................... "" ..... ' [[ [
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No. ~_ Re:
Planner
Area:~__
We have reviewed this case and have the following co~ents:
~ Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary sto~ flood hazard.
However, a sto~ of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There ts adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites, lhe natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions tn order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, 'All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
/ This project Is tn the~F[/~E~~/~. Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordanbe with the applicable rules and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated ts still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of
free of ordinary stoa flood hazard when improvements ,avehoeenrOject
~ T~p
will
be
constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
t.? .- /~ .? / /
JOHN H. KASHUBA
Senior Civil Engineer
,./ /~--
PLANNING 6t ENGINEERING
46-209 OASIS ~['REET, SUITE 405
INDIO, CA 92201
(619) 342-8886
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOHE~AT~N WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
GLEN J, NEWMAN
FIRE CHIEF
'ERSID~ CA 9250X
~OV 3 0 198~ (714) 787-6606
TO: PLANNING DEPARTI~NT
ATTN: . JEFF ADAHS
RIVERSIDE COUNIy
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE:
PARCEL NAP 24038 - Al. fENDED
~ith respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department reconnnends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
Upgrade fire hydrants on the corner of Hercedes Street and 6th Street, and
firs hydrant in cul-de-sac on 6th Street to a super fire hydrant (6x4x2}x2~).
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff.
ml
RAYIiOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Kurt Hantwell, Fire Safety Specialist
Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
December 6, 1989
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: Jeff Adams
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Parcel Map 24038, Amended #1
'Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for
all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of
the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.8 of Ordinance 348.
Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side yard
setback.
Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum
side yard setback.
Ver truly yours,
Senior Land Use Technician
/sn
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
GRADING SECTION
TO: PLANNING / J.A.
FROM: HOWARD MILLS
DATE: November 16, 1989 LDC
RE: Parcel Map 24038 AMD #1
The ,,Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site.
The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Grading Section" recommends
approval of this project if the following conditions are included.
Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the
applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from
the Building and Safety Department.
Prior to issuance of any building per~it, the property owner shall
obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and
Safety Department.
Plant and irrigate fill slopes greater than or equal to 3' and/or cut
slopes greater than or equal to 5' in vertical height with grass or
gound cover. Slopes that exceed 15' in vertical height are to be
provided with shrubs and/or trees per count ordinance 457, see form 284-
47.
Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards will require performance
security to be posted with the Building and Safety Department.
NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide the applicable information
from Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86,
and 284-46. Thank you.
Eastern Municipal' vvrat er District
October 6, 1988
Riverside County Health Oepart~nent
c/o Massaro Welsh 157Z
San .~ernardlnO,
Gentlemen:
Re: Availability of Sanitary Sewer Service for Parcel Map 24038
We hereby advise you relative to the avatlabiitty of sanitary sewer service for
the above referenced proposed development as follows:
The property to be occupied by the subject proposed development:
/l~'/ Is presently loca~ed within the boundary lines of this Oi'strlct's
Improvement District No. U-8_.~__and is eligible to receive sanitary
se~r service,
Must be annexed to this District's Improvement Otstrict No.
following which it will be eligible to receive sanitary sewer
service,
provided:
l)
· If you
to contact this office.
Must be included tn a new District improvement district, assess-
merit district or other program to be formed and implemented for
the purpose of providing sanitary sewer facilities and service
for the generel area within which this proposed development is
located, following which it will be eligible to receive sanitary
sewer service,
The developer completes all necessary financial and other
arrangements therefore, as determined by the District, with the
01strict by April.lggO ; and
2) That no limiting conditions exist which are beyond this District's
control or cannot be cost-effectively and/or reasonably satisfied
by the District, which conditions may include but.are not limited
to, acts of God, regulatory agency requirements or decisions,
or legal actions initiated by others.
have any questions or coranents regarding the foregoing, do not hesitate
Very truly~yours,
.~./. ;'. :/,c. Zy ·~
Robert N. Spradltn
Manager of New Business