HomeMy WebLinkAbout91_031 PC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 91-031
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 23102 TO SUBDIVIDE A 16.4 ACRE PARCEL
INTO 37 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, LOCATED
WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND NORTH OF
LA SERENA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 923-200-019.
WHEREAS, Marlborough Development Corporation filed Extension of Time
in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time
on April 15, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
approved said Extension of Time;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION _1.. F_~. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the ,following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not
subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general
plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
A:VTM23102
7
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
(a)
There is a reasonable probability that the land
use or action proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
(c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County Generel Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior
to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest
portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of
the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Extension of Time is consistent with the SWAP
and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
(1) The city is preceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, pureuant to this title, each of the following:
(a)
There is reasonable probability that First
Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23102 preposed will be consistent with
A:VTM23102
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
(c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460,
no subdivision or extension of time may be approved unless the following
findings are made:
a)
That the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
b)
That the design or improvement of the proposed
land division is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans.
c)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the type of development.
d)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the proposed density of
the development.
e)
That the design of the proposed land division or
proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat.
f)
That the design of the proposed land division or
the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
A:VTM23102
9
g)
That the design of the proposed land division or
the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for
access through, or use of, property within the
proposed land division. A land division may be
approved if it is found that alternate easements
for access or for use will be provided and that
they will be substantially equivalent to ones
previously acquired by the public. This
subsection shall apply only to easements of
record or to easements established by judgment
of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2) The Planning Commission in approving the proposed
Extension of Time, makes the following findings, to wit'
a)
There is a reasonable probability that this
project will be consistent with the City's future
General Plan, which will be completed in a
reasonable time and in accordance with State
law, due to the fact that the project is consistent
with existing site development standards in that
it proposes articulated design features and site
amenities commensurate with existing and
anticipated residential development standards.
b)
There is not a likely probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future and
adopted general plan, if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan,
due to the fact that the project is in conformance
with existing and anticipated land use and
design guidelines standards.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with state
planning and zoning laws, due to the fact that
the proposed use conforms with those uses
listed as "allowed" within the project site's
existing Specific Plan No. 199 (Low Density
Family Housing) land use designation.
A:VTM23102
10
d)
e)
f)
g)
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, cimulation
patterns, access, and density, due to the fact
that; adequate area is provided for all proposed
residential structures; adequate landscaping is
provided along the project's public and private
frontages; and the internal circulation plan
should not create traffic conflicts as design
provisions are in conformance with adopted City
standards.
The project as designed and conditioned will not
adversely affect the public health or welfare,
due to the fact that the conditions stated in the
approval are based on mitigation measures
necessary to reduce or eliminate potential
adverse impacts of the project.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102 is
compatible with surrounding land uses. The
harmony in scale, bulk, height, density and
coverage creates a compatible physical
relationship with adjoining properties, due to the
fact that the proposal is similar in compatibility
with surrounding land uses; and adequate area
and design features provide for siting of
proposed development in terms of landscaping
and internal traffic circulation.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on
surrounding property because it does not
represent a significant change to the present or
planned land use of the area, due to the fact
that the proposed project is consistent with the
current zoning of the subject site (Specific Plan
No. 199), and also consistent with the adopted
Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP)
designation of Specific Plan.
A:VTM23102
11
h)
The project as designed and conditioned will not
adversely affect the built or natural environment
as determined in the Negative Declaration
adopted by the County for the project, due to
the fact that impact mitigation is realized by
conformance with the project's Conditions of
Approval.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact that
the project currently proposes an independent
access point from La Serena Way which has
been determined to be adequate by the City
Engineer.
J)
The design of the subdivision, the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout are
such that they are not in conflict with easements
for access through or use of the property within
the proposed projects, due to the fact that this is
clearly represented in the site plan and the
project analysis.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applicants and herein
incorporated by reference, due to the fact that
they are referenced in the attached Staff
Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment,
and Conditions of Approval.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Tentative Tract
Map is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
SECTION 2. Environmental CompliancP..
That the City of Temecula Planning commission hereby determines that the
previous Environmental Determination (Adoption of Negative Declaration for
Environmental Assessment No. 32534) still applies to said tract map. An Initial Study
prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a
A:VTM23102
12
significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case
because the mitigation measures described in EIR Nos. 107 and 202 and in the
Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration,
therefore, is hereby granted.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves the First
Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102 for the subdivision of a 16.4
acre parcel into 37 single family residential lots located west of Butterfield Stage Road
and north of La Serena Way and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 923-200-019 subject to
the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April 1991.
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the
15th day of April 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Blair, Fahey, Ford, and Chiniaeff
NOES:
0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Hoagland
A:V'FM23102
13
ATTACHMENTII
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall
comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set
forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the
provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required
by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director verification that Section 10.35
of Ordinance No. 460 has been satisfied regarding payment of parks and
recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. 460.
Verification shall be submitted prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy.
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within the
project boundary until the developer's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of
compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred
dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public
library development.
This conditionally approved Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
23102 will expire one (1) year after the original expiration date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is November 8, 1991.
The subdivider shall comply with the original Conditions of Approval for Tentative
Tract Map No. 23102 (see attached) except as amended herein.
Engineering Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the
true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways,
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further consideration.
A:VTM23102
12
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and
all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil
Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map
Act and Ordinance No. 460.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Metropolitan Water District;
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers.
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City
Engineer.
10.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the
land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be
submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
11.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer
and City Attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties
having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City
a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be
reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be subject to
the following conditions:
a. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense.
The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of
Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include such
provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem
necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
A:VTM23102
The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the
final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities.
The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated
and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand
and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the
owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or
the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the
City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed.
The declaration shall contain language prohibiting further subdivision
of any lots, whether they are lettered lots or numbered lots.
ii.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently
maintained by homeowner's association or other means acceptable
to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the
Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to issuance of building
permits.
12.
The developer, or the developer's successor, shall execute a current Public
Facilities Agreement with the City of Temecula which provides for the payment of
the sum of money per residential unit then established by Resolution of the City
Council, prior to the issuance of any building permits for any individual lots.
13.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in
conformance with applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping,
traffic signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Landscaping (street and parks).
d. Sewer and domestic water systems.
e. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines.
A:VTM23102
14.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
15.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the City
Engineer.
16.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigatipn towards
traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment
of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City
deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
17. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent.
18. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the property line.
19.
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the
Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code,
Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of
Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer.
20.
A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
21.
The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions
of the site.
22.
A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. All
drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
23.
On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way, shall be contained
within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the
final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and
obstructions."
24.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with
supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the
Riverside County Flood Control District for review.
25.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
26.
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the
Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street
improvements.
A:VTM23102
15
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
27.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an
encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office.
28.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
29.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
30.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils
Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
31.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building
Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading
plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
32.
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter,
A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all
interior public streets.
33.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times
with adequate detours during construction.
34.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than 14 days following
placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the
State Standard Specifications.
35.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the
amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public
facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on
which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof,
the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a
copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said
Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated
A:VTM23102
(assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically
waives its right to protest such increase.
Transportation Engineering
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
36. A signing plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by
the City Engineer for Streets "A" through "D" and shall be shown on the street
improvement plans.
37. Condition No. 5 in the County of Riverside Road letter dated July 22, 1988 shall be
deleted.
38. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for
the design requirements.
39. Condition No. 27 in the County of Riverside Road letter dated July 22, 1988 shall
be modified to read: A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered
Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for La Serena Way and shall be
included with the street improvement plans.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
40. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or
other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
41. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping
plans.
Building & Raft. ry. Depadment
42.
43.
44.
Submit approved tract map to the Department of Bui'lding and Safety for
addressing prior to submittal for Structural Plan Review.
Obtain Land Use and Building Department clearance.
School Fees shall be paid to Temecula Unified School District prior to issuance of
permits.
A:VTM23102
17