HomeMy WebLinkAbout01_025 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-025
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECU/A RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE THE FOLLOWING:
1) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE HARVESTON
SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0419);
2) THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 99-0418);
3) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE HARVESTON
SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING STANDARDS (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 99-0418);
4) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A CHANGE OF ZONE
TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY
(PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0245); AND
5) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A CODE
AMENDMENT TO SECTION 17.16.070 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418);
6) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE HARVESTON
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE SERVICE
COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THE
SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0446);
ON PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES
LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA
GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH
OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-110-
013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910-
110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-005,
910-120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911-630-
003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-
180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023,
AND 911-180-028.
WHEREAS, Lennar Communities filed Planning Application Nos. PA00-0419 (General Plan
Amendment), PA99-0418 (Specific Plan, Development Code Amendment, Harveston Zoning
Standards), PA99-0245 (Change of Zone), and PA99-0446 (Development Agreement, (the
"Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code,
CEQA Guidelines and California State CEQA Guidelines;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, two parcels (one consisting of 1.25 acres and one consisting of 2.5 acres)
located within the boundaries of the Specific Plan are not under the applicant's ownership. The City
hereby finds it necessary to change the Land Use Designation of the two excluded parcels on the
General Plan Land Use Map from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Low Medium (LM) residential
to ensure the public health, safety and welfare of the City and to facilitate future development of
these two parcels by removing the requirement for the preparation and approval of a separate
Specific Plan.
R:\S PXHarveston SPXPC Docs~RES-SP-GPA-DA-ZC.PC.doc
WHEREAS, the General Plan Land Use designation of the approximately 1.3 acre parcel
north and west of Equity Drive and Ynez Road is being changed from SC (Service Commercial) to
BP (Business Park) to be compatible with the proposed Specific Plan, the existing Business Park
Land Use designation, the existing development to the south and east, and to accommodate the
future alignment of Ynez Road;
WHEREAS, the zoning of the two excluded parcels not owned by the applicant are being
changed from SP (Specific Plan) and shall be re-zoned to Low Medium Density Residential (LM) on
the official zoning map of the City. The City hereby finds it necessary to change the zoning and
Land Use Designation of the two excluded parcels to ensure the public health, safety and welfare of
the City and to facilitate futura development of these two parcels by ramoving the requirament for
the praparation and approval of a separate Specific Plan;
WHEREAS, the zoning of the approximately 1.3 acre parcel north and west of Equity Drive
and Ynez Road is being changed from SP (Specific Plan) on the official zoning map of the City and
shall be re-zoned to LI (Light Industrial) to be compatible with the existing industrial developments to
the south and east, to be compatible with the General Plan Land Use Map, and to accommodate the
future alignment of Ynez Road;
WHEREAS, the Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.16.070 shall be amended to add
Specific Plan NO. 13, the Harveston Specific Plan and adopting the zoning ordinance and
development standards contained in the Harveston Specific Plan by Ordinance;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on June 20, 2001 and July
12, 2001, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission racommended approval of the Application subject to the recommended
conditions, together with the concurrent recommendation on the Harveston EIR and adoption of the
Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to
the City of Temecula General Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. In all respects as set forth in the recitals hereinabove, which are hereby
incorporated by referance.
Section 2. Findings. That the Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the
Application, hereby makes the following findings:
General Plan Amendment: The General Plan Amendment is necessary to conform to the current
General Plan land uses and development criteria set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan. Further,
the General Plan Amendment serves to designate the Land Use for the excluded parcels in a
manner more conducive to proper planning and future development.
Specific Plan Findinqs
A. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan, as it is proposed to
be amended, and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and
policies of the General Plan and Development Code. The Specific Plan is a raallocation and
R:xS P~larveston SPxPC DOCSXRES-SP-GPA-DA-ZC.PC.doc
2
redistribution of the majority of the existing Land Use Designations and serves as an implementation
tool for the General Plan. Therefore, as proposed, the Specific Plan is consistent with the General
Plan, as it is proposed to be amended, and Development Code.
B. The proposed Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The project has been reviewed by agencies and staff,
and is determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan (as it is proposed to be
amended), Development Code, Design Guidelines and Growth Management Program Action Plan.
These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the
community. In addition, the Specific Plan is a master planned community with specific design
guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in
terms of density, design and circulation. Therefore, as proposed, conditioned and designed, the
Specific Plan is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations
and the anticipated land use developments. There are no physical constraints of the site which
would preclude or prohibit the requested land use designations or anticipated developments.
Moreover, the proposed Specific Plan land uses are consistent with the land uses of the General
Plan and will serves as the tool to regulate and implement the goals and policies of the General
Plan. The applicant has submitted applications for Tentative Tract Maps which illustrates that the
site is physically suitable for the land uses and development proposed in the Specific Plan.
D. The proposed project shall ensure development of desirable character which will be
compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The project
proposes similar residential land uses adjacent to the existing surrounding neighborhoods, with
extensive landscape buffers and interfaces. The limited neighborhood commercial development is
proposed within a Village Center and is designed to be pedestrian oriented to serve the needs of the
Harveston community. The proposed Service Commemial land is west of Ynez Road, adjacent to
Interstate 15 where similar commercial and retail uses currently exist along the Interstate corridor.
The Specific Plan took under consideration the existing developments and surrounding zoning
classifications to ensure development that will be complementary and compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood.
Development Agreement Findinqs
A. The City desires to obtain the binding agreement of the Applicant for the
development of the properiy in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
B. The Applicant desires to obtain the binding agreement of the City to permit the
Developer to develop the Developer's Project on the Developer's Parcels in accordance with the
"Applicable Rules" (as hereinafter defined) and this Agreement.
C. The Applicant has applied to the City in accordance with applicable procedures for
approval of these mutually binding Agreements. The Planning Commission of the City has given
notice of its intention to recommend the Agreement to the City Council, and has found that the
provisions of this Agreement are consistent with the Specific Plan and the City's General Plan, as
amended.
D. These Agreements are consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare needs of
the residents of the City and the surrounding region. The City has specifically considered and
approved the impact and benefits of the development of the Property in accordance with these
Agreements upon the welfare of the region.
R:\S P~l-larvesmn SPXPC DocsW. ES-SP-GPA-DA-ZC.PC.doc
3
E. These Agreements will bind the City to the terms and obligations specified in this
Agreement and will limit, to the degree specified in the Agreement and under State law, the future
exercise of the City's ability to delay, postpone, preclude or regulate development on the Property,
except a provided for herein.
F. In accordance with the Development Agreement Statutes, this Agreement eliminates
uncertainty in the planning process and provides for the orderly development of the Property.
Further, this Agreement eliminates uncertainty about the validity of exactions imposed by the City,
allows installation of necessary improvements, provides for public services necessary for the region
with incidental benefits for the Property, and generally serves the public interest within the City of
Temecula and the surrounding region.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. This Planning Commission has reviewed the draft
EIR and Mitigation Monitoring Program and recommend that the City Council approve and certify the
same.
Section 4. Recommendation to the City Council: The City of Temecula Planning
Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the following:
1. Resolution approving the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan contained in
Exhibit A, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A-l, A-2 and A-3 attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference;
2. Adopt an Ordinance amending the Development Code and adopting the zoning
standards and as contained in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference;
3. Adopt an Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Temecula as
contained in Exhibit C substantially in the form contained in Exhibit C-1 attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference; and
4. Adopt an Ordinance authorizing the Harveston Development Agreement as
contained in Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
All substantially in the forms contained in the above referenced Exhibits for the property located east
of Interstate 15, north of Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and south of the northern
City limit substantially in form contained in Exhibit A-3, subject to the recommendations set forth in
Exhibit A-1 (Conditions of Approval for the Harveston Specific Plan).
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 12th day of July 2001.
ATTEST:
Ron Gu~erriero, Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:XS IAHarveston SPxPC DocsXP, ES-SP-GPA-DA-ZC.PC.doc
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 01-025 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City
of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of July, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Mathewson, Olhasso,
Telesio, and Chairman Guerriero
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~S PxHarvcsmn SPXPC DocsW, ES-SP-GPA-DA-ZC.PC.doc
5
EXHIBIT A (For Attachment No. 2)
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION FOR THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
AND
SPECIFIC PLAN
R:~ P~arveston SP~PC Docs~ PC STAFFRPT,doc
21
EXHIBIT A (For Attachment No. 2)
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0419 (GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT) FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE
TWO EXCLUDED PARCELS WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND
ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-
0418) ON PARCELS TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF
INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF
MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-
110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 91 0-110-021, 910-110-027, 91 0-11 0-
076, 910-100-007, 91 0-100-008, 91 0-060-009, 910-120-005, 91 0-120-007,
910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001,911 -
640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-
009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AND 911-180-028, BASED UPON THE
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION.
WHEREAS, Lennar Communities filed Planning Application Nos. PA00-0419 and PA99-
0418 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan,
Development Code, CEQA Guidelines and California State CEQA Guidelines;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on June 20, 2001, at duly
noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had
an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on ,2001, at a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons
had an dpportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Council approved of the Application, and certified the Environmental Impact Report,
made all required findings and determinations relative thereto and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring
Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula
General Plan as amended;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findings. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the
following findings as required in Chapter 17.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
R:~S I~Ha~eston SP~City Council~RESO CC GPA.doc
1
General Plan Amendment.
A. The project as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety
and welfare of the community. The project has been reviewed by agencies and staff and
determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, Development Code, Design
Guidelines and Growth Management Program Action Plan. These documents set policies and
standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are
adequate for emergency vehicles. The two excluded pamels not under the applicant's ownership
that ara located within the Specific Plan shall hereby be rezoned from SP (Specific Plan overlay
district) to LM (Low Medium Density Residential) to be compatible with the surrounding land uses of
the Harveston Specific Plan. The General Plan Land use designation of these two parcels will be
changed from NC (Neighborhood Commemial) to LM (Low Medium Density Residential). The City
hereby finds it necessary to change the zoning and Land Use Designation of the two excluded
parcels to ensure the public health, safety and welfare of the City and to facilitate future
development of these two parcels by removing the raquirement for a separate Specific Plan.
B. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project proposes similar
residential neighborhoods adjacent to existing surrounding neighborhoods, with interface buffers
and full roadway improvements. The limited neighborhood commercial development is proposed
within a Village Center and is designed to be pedestrian oriented to serve the needs of the
Harveston community. The Service Commercial is west of Ynez Road, adjacent to Interstate 15
where similar commercial and retail uses currently exist along the Interstate corridor.
C. The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it
remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The project does not
represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site. The General Plan Amendment
is a relocation and reallocation of existing land use designations that conforms to the design of the
specific plan.
Specific Plan
A. The proposed specific plan is consistent with the General Plan, as it is proposed to
be amended, and development code. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and
policies of the general plan and development code. The Specific Plan is a reallocation and
redistribution of the majority of the existing Land Use Designations and serves as an implementation
tool for the General Plan. Therefore, as proposed, the Specific Plan is consistent with the general
plan, as it is proposed to be amended, and development code.
B. The proposed Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The project has been reviewed by agencies and staff,
and is determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan (as it is proposed to be
amended), Development Code, Design Guidelines and Growth Management Program Action Plan.
These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the
community. In addition, the Specific Plan is a master planned community with specific design
guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in
terms of density, design and circulation. Therefore, as proposed, conditioned and designed, the
Specific Plan is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations
and the anticipated land use developments. There are no physical constraints of the site which
would preclude or prohibit the requested land use designations or anticipated developments.
Moreover, the proposed Specific Plan land uses are consistent with the land uses of the General
Plan and will serves as the tool to regulate and implement the goals and policies of the General
Plan. The applicant has submitted applications for Tentative Tract Maps which indicate that the site
R:~S l~tarveston S~City CounciI~RESO CC GPA.doc
is physically suitable for the land uses and development proposed in the Specific Plan.
D. The proposed project shall ensure development of desirable character which will be
compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The project
proposes similar residential land uses adjacent to the existing surrounding neighborhoods, with
extensive landscape buffers and interfaces. The limited neighborhood commercial development is
proposed within a Village Center and is designed to be pedestrian oriented to serve the needs of the
Harveston community. The proposed Service Commercial land is west of Ynez Road, adjacent to
Interstate 15 where similar commercial and retail uses currently exist along the Interstate corridor.
The Specific Plan took under consideration the existing developments and surrounding zoning
classifications to ensure development that will be complementary and compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The City Council of the City of Temecula has
certified the Final Environmental Impact Report, made all required findings and determinations
relative thereto and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project
proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan, as amended, for the
Harveston Specific Plan in order to approve the Application.
Section 4. General Plan Amendment. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby
approves the Application changing the General Plan Land Use Designations on 550 acres on
property located east of Interstate 15, north of Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and
south of the northern City, and known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 910-261, -001,910-261-002, 910-
110-013, 910-110-O15, 910-110-020, 910-1:10-021,910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007,910-
100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-005, 910-120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911-
630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911 -
180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 and 911-180-028.
Section 5. Specific Plan. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves
mixed use specific plan known as the Harveston Specific Plan (SP No. 13), on property located east
of Interstate 15, north of Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and south of the northern
City, and known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 910-261, -001,910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015,
910-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009,
910-120-005, 910-120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001,
911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015,
911-180-023 and 911-180-028 subject to that attached Conditions of Approval.
R:~ I:'~Harvcs[o~ SP~Cit7 Counci]~.ESO CC GPA.doc
3
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Department this 6th day of June 2001.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No.
2001 - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting the_reof held on the day of 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNClLMEMBERS:
Susan W, Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
R:~S P~Harveston SP~City Council~RESO CC GPA.doc
4
EXHIBIT A-1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE
HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN
R:~S P~arveston SP~PC Docs~ PC STAFFRPT.doc
22
EXHIBIT Aol
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0418 (Specific Plan) - Harveston Specific Plan No. 13
Project Description:
A Specific Plan consisting of approximately 550 acres that proposes
1,921 residential units with a variety of residential product types and
lot sizes; a 12 acre elementary school site; a 7 acre lake with a 6.9
acre lake park; a 16.5 acre community park; a 13.8 acre arroyo open
space park; a Mixed-Use Overlay zone (Village Green) which may be
as large as 13 acres; and 112.5 acres of Service Commercial land
adjacent to Interstate 15.
Assessor's Parcel Nos.
910-261-001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-
020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-
100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-005, 910-120-007, 910-120-008,
911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001, 911-640-
002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911 -
180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AND 911-180-028.
Approval Date:
June 20, 2001
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Nine
· Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($928.00) which includes the Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollar
($850.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight
Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination for the Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code
Section 21151 and California Code of Regulations Section 15904. If within said forty-eight
(48) hour period the Applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department
- Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be
void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, defend with counsel of City's own election, and hold
harmless, the City and any' agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers,
employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or
any agency or instrumentality thereof, er any of its officers, employees, and agents, to
attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the
City, er any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative
body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and
Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by
the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the
permittee/appiicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period.
R:~S P~Harveston SP~PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said
amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City
shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally
concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant
shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City,
any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents.
All development within this site shall be in accordance with the requirements of all City
ordinances, except as expressly modified herein or by de~,elopmont agreement, and State.
laws, and shall conform with the approved Specific Plan. Regulations or procedures not
covered by the Specific Plan or appurtenant documents shall be subject to the City
ordinances in effect at the time entitlement is required.
Approval of this Specific Plan is contingent upon and shall not become effective nor shall it
vest until a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zone Change are approved by the City
Council, and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or any other environmental review under
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are certified by the City
Council.
Nothing in this approval, as memorialized in this Resolution, shall require or be interpreted to
require the City of Temecula to fund or cause to be funded the development of any facilities
or improvements, including but not limited to infrastructure improvements, which are
necessary or convenient to cause, allow or further the development of the subject Specific
Plan, except as may be expressly agreed to by the City of Temecula."
Notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, the Developer and the City may
enter into a development agreement, pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 through
65869.5 or other agreement(s) requiring the Developer to: 1) advance the funding or
construction of public improvements; 2) redefine the scope of any public improvement; 3)
acquire or fund the acquisition of land for public purposes; and 4) waive any right to
reimbursement for facilities or the dedication of land. Further, notwithstanding any of the
conditions contained herein, Developer may seek an agreement for reimbursement for any
improvements or facilities that qualify for reimbursement at such time as the City of
Temecula adopts an ordinance for such reimbursement pursuant to and consistent with
California Government Code Sections 66485 through 66489, inclusive, and further shall
waive the same in the event of agreements, consistent with the foregoing, that require or
include any or all of the terms set forth immediately above.
Once the Project Study Report (PSR) conducted by Caltrans is completed, the read
alignments affecting the individual planning areas (i.e. Ynez Road and Cherry/Date Street)
may be altered or modified to implement the PSR. The alternation or modification of the
roads will not require a Specific Plan Amendment; however, all applicable text, sections,
figures and exhibits in the Specific Plan shall be modified to reflect the actual roadway
alignments as determined in the PSR subject to the approval of the Director of Planning and
Public Works Director.
Within thirty (30) days of approval of the Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit a final copy
reflecting ail the changes necessary to make the document consistent with City Council's
final action. The final Specific Plan shall be reviewed for consistency and approved by the
Planning Director.
The applicant shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures contained in the adopted
City of Temecuia General Plan and the Harveston Environmental Impact Report.
R:\S P',Harveston SP~PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
2
10.
A detailed noise mitigation analysis shall be performed, at the final map stage (for individual
planning areas) for all future project noise-sensitive uses potentially exposed to noise levels
in excess of 60 dB CNEL to verify that planned noise protection will meet City of Temecula
standards.
A. Exterior recreational areas shall be protected to achieve noise levels of less than 65 dB
CNEL.
B. Interior living areas shall be protected to achieve noise levels of less than 45 dB CNEL.
Substantial perimeter walls separating rear yards from the roadway right-of-way along
Date Street area are anticipated to be necessary. Precise wall geometrics shall be
determined once exact setbacks and building pad grades are established.
Moderately upgrading window treatments shall be necessary along Date Street in
upstairs bedrooms closest to the roadway. Minor acoustical upgrades shall be needed
along Margarita or Ynez beyond simply closing windows to shut out roadway noise. The
building code requires that supplemental fresh air ventilation be provided in rooms where
window closure for traffic noise protection is necessary. A detailed noise attenuation
evaluation shall be conducted in a supplemental acoustical study to be submitted when
the tract map is filed with the appropriate agency.
11.
During staff review of any tentative map, an updated geotechnical/geologic report shall be
prepared to include any necessary revisions to earthwork, foundation, design, and
construction recommendations.
12.
On residential streets that generate less than 250 vehicular trips, the road (curb to curb)
shall be thirty-six feet (36') with a parkway separating the sidewalk from the curb.
13.
During the development plan review; major employer (more than 250 employees) who locate
their businesses within the project shall prepare Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) plans in accordance with the Riverside County Transportation Commission/VVestem
Riverside Council of Governments (RCCTC/WRCOG) guidelines.
14.
Prior to the approval of a development plan or tentative map for individual planning areas,
the developer and City staff will review plans, especially for multi-family housing areas,
commemial uses, and parks for the provision of appropriate, necessary, and adequate
pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
15.
Prior to the approval of a development plan, City staff will review plans, especially for
commercial and park uses, for the provision of appropriate, necessary and adequate
pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
16.
Prior to the approval of a development plan, City staff will review plans, for all service
commercial uses and shall encourage the provision of park and ride facilities.
17.
Prior to approval of any development projects, appropriate clearances, conditions and
approvals from all agencies with jurisdiction on project review shall be obtained by the
developer. These agencies shall be determined by the Director of Planning and the City
Engineer.
18.
The developer or the developer's successor-in-interest shall be responsible for maintaining
the undeveloped portion of the site including weed abatement and litter removal.
R:~S P~'la~eston SP~PC Docs~COA-SP.doc
3
19.
Prior to approval of any development projects, the developer shall investigate the feasibility
of a reclaimed water system, to irdgate landscaping within the roadway medians, parkways,
drainage channel, schools, the community park, the paseo park, neighborhood parks, and
other common open space areas. The developer shall provide evidence that compliance
with this condition is in accordance with Senate Bill 2095.
20.
The Master Developer shall provide the prospective home buyers a notice that the 16.5-acre
community park will include sports field lighting for evening use. Proof of this notification
shall be provided to the Planning Department and included in the Master Covenants, Codes
arid Restrictions (CC&R's) prior to the recordation of the first Final Map.
21. All lighting shall be reviewed by the City to assure compliance with the Ordinance No. 655.
22. The lake park, but not the surface of the lake, shall be open to the p.ublic.
23.
The approval granted by this Resolution shall become effective upon the Effective Date of
the Development Agreement, as the term Effective Date is. defined in the Development
Agreement adopted concurrently with this Resolution. In addition to the foregoing, in the
event a Development Agreement is entered into that supercedes or alters these conditions
of approval and the applicant causes a default or terminates by conduct the Development
Agreement, then the City shall immediately consider the revo~:ation of the approval granted
by this Resolution.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
24.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
25.
The developer shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan showing conformance to all
N PDES requirements (enacted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Regional
Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region) for review and approval by the City
Engineer.
26.
The developer shall provide proof to the Department of Public Works and Planning that the
conditions the 404 and 1603 permits pertaining to the Arroyo Park restoration have been
bonded for and shall be implemented consistent with the timing requirements of the permits.
27.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and retum one signed
set to the Planning Department for their files.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
28.
The developer shall provide proof to the City's-Traffic Engineer that the project has
contributed its fair-share towards regional traffic improvement systems (i.e., traffic impact
fees) for the area through a Development Agreement or other agreement. This shall include
efforts to synchronize traffic lights on streets impacted by project development.
29.
Prior to the approval of a development plan or tentative map, staff shall forward the
proposed application to the Riverside County Transit Agency (RTA) for review and comment
regarding bus turnouts, shelters, etc. Transit-oriented facilities and design features will be
incorporated into the design of the project as appropriate, to the satisfaction of the City and
RTA.
R:~S P~Har~eston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
30.
The develOper shall provide proof that energy saving features will '~3e installed in project
homes as required by the Califomia Building Code. Features may include: solar or Iow-
emission water heaters, solar roof tiles, energy efficient appliances, dual paned windows,
Iow pressure sodium parking lights, etc. Additionally, residential products constructed bythe
home building division of Lennar shall incorporate "Comfort Wise" energy-efficiency
features.
31.
Landscaping design and water conservation devices that conform to the California Model
Water Conservation Ordinance shall be required, such as Iow flow toilets, faucets and
showerheads, shade tree selection and placement.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan
all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
32. All utility systems such as electric, including those which provide direct service to the project
site and/or currently exist along public rights-of-ways adjacent to the site (except electrical
lines rated 33 kv or greater), gas, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be placed
underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in
accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
33.
Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, as deemed necessary by the Department of
Public Works, the Developer shall consult with the State of California Department of Fish
and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine if
permits or approvals are necessary from such agencies for any action contemplated by this
proposal. Such consultation shall be in wdting, and copies of said correspondence, including
responses from agencies, shall be submitted to the City. Where appropriate, the terms,
conditions, and recommendations of the noted agencies shall be incorporated as Conditions
of Approval into the areas of development.
34.
All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or
other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department
of Public Works.
35.
Landscaping and permanent irrigation facilities shall be installed with all street improvements
on and off-site grading. Perimeter walls, where required, shall be treated with graffiti-
resistant coating and shall be installed adjacent to street improvements within each phase.
36.
A phasing plan addressing the schedule of necessary infrastructure requirements shall be
approved by the Department of Public Works and the Planning Director prior to approval of
any subsequent application.
37.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with~ Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06, unless otherwise provided for by a written
agreement between the City and the Developer.
38. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required real property interests
necessary to carry out these conditions, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer
R:~S P~-Iarveston SI:~PC Oocs\COA-SP.doc
5
shall, prior to submittal of the Final Map for recordation, 'enter into an agreement to complete
the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5.
Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred bythe City
to acquire the real property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Secudty of
a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall
have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
CIRCULATION
39. Prior to Final Map recordation, the Developer is responsible to bond for or construct the
traffic signals at the project's accesses, as required, including the associated street
improvements, based on traffic signal warrants analysis relative to subsequent tentative
maps and/or development applications.
40.
Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development
as approved by the Department of Public Works. Access to office and commercial areas
shall be reviewed by the Department of Public Works at the time of submittal of individual
tentative maps and/or development applications, Additional rights-of-way at entries to the
aforementioned sites may be required to provide for turning lanes as directed by the
Department of Public Works,
41.
The exact location and number of access points shall be Subject to review and approval by
the Department of Public Works upon future tentative map and/or development plan
approvals,
42.
All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and requirements
of the Circulation Element cf City's General Plan, City ordinances and standards or as
approved with the Harveston Specific Plan.
43. All intersection intervals shall comply with City standards and requirements.
44.
The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location and
number of bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside Transportation
Agency (RTA). Additional rights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays shall be
provided by the Developer.
45.
Necessary improvements have been/will be conditioned based on the project traffic studies
and the conceptual phasing plan shown on Section 12 of the Specific Plan. Any substantive
rephasing of the development must be approved by the Planning and Public Works Director
through a rephasing application. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits within any
phase, all on and offsite improvements as referred to in the Traffic Reports and subsequent
addenda along with additional requirements set herein, or as set by conditions on individual
tracts, must be constructed and/or bonded as required by the Department of Public Works,
46.
Ensuing Traffic Reports, analyzing traffic impacts associated with subsequent development
stages of the Specific Plan, shall be submitted to identify implementation and timing of the
necessary improvements to mitigate cumulative traffic impacts.
TRAFFIC MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
47. The Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program proposes that a traffic study be approved prior to
the issuance of first occupancy permit in each additional phases of the development. The
R:~S P'~Harveston SP~PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
6
intent of the Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program is not to re-define:~nitigation responsibility,
but rather to assist in the refinement of area improvement needs and the timing of the
improvements. The traffic study would: 1 ) document ambient traffic volumes conditions; 2)
estimate trip generation for the particular development phase; and 3) assess traffic
conditions with the traffic added by the particular development phase. The exact study area
to be addressed in each of the traffic studies should be defined through discussions with the
City Traffic Engineer. In general the study area should include the immediate access
intersections and roadways, which would serve the new development phase and those
critical off-site intersections and roadways that will provide primary access to the new
development. Cdtical intersections / roadways are defined as those facilities that are
experiencing high levels of peak period traffic congestion (at the time the traffic study is to be
performed). The traffic study findings would assist the City in proactively planning for area
roadway improvements.
DRAINAGE
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
Drainage and flood control facilities shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of
the City and/or Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
(RCFC&WCD).
Prior to approval of any subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit
the master drainage plan to the City and RCFC&WCD to review the adequacy of the
proposed and existing downstream drainage facilities.
Drainage facilities within each phase shall be constructed immediately after the completion
of the site grading and pdor to or concurrently with the initial site development within that
phase.
All drainage facilities shall be designed to convey 100-year storm flows, subject to the
approval of the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD, as applicable.
The Developer shall construct the proposed on and offsite drainage facility improvements
and the interim detention basin provision as recommended in the Specific Plan and
Drainage Study documents and/or as directed by the Department of Public Works and
RCFC&WCD, as applicable.
As required by the Department of Public Works, additional Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports
shall be submitted with subsequent tentative maps and/or development applications to study
the drainage impacts and analyze necessary measures to mitigate the runoff created as part
of t.he development of this project.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or
through the site.
The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of
the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by
constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing
drainage easements.
WATER AND SEWER
56. Water and sewer facilities shall be installed in accordance with the requirements and
specifications of the City, Rancho California Water District (RCWD), and Eastern Municipal
R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
7
57.
58.
Water District (EMWD). Such requirements shall be applied at the subdivision or plot plan
stages of the development.
Prior to the approval of subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit
the master water plan to RCWD to check for adequacy of the proposed water facilities. The
Developer shall obtain written approval for the water system from RCWD.
Prior to the approval of subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit
the master sewer plan to EMWD to check for adequacy of the proposed sewer facilities. The
Developer shall obtain written approval for the sewer system from EMWD.
GRADING
59. No grading shall be permitted for any development area prior to tentative map or plot plan
approval and issuance of grading permits for the specific area of development.
60.
Grading plans and operations shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Report, or any
subsequent reports prepared for the project, the conditions of the grading permit, and
accepted grading construction practices and the recommendations and standards specified
in the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) document.
61.
Prior to issuance of any grading permit, erosion control plans shall be praparad in
conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of
Public Works. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing
the grading and erosion control improvements.
62.
The Developer shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board,
and the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) implemented by the San Diego
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
63.
64.
Each subsequent application for a phase of development shall include a conceptual grading
plan to indicate at a minimum:
a) Preliminary quantity estimates for grading.
b) Techniques and methods which will be used to prevent erosion and sedimentation
during and after the grading process in compliance with the City Standards and NPDES
requirements.
c) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
d) Designation of the borrow or stockpile site location for import/export material.
e) Approximate time frames for development including the identification of araas which will
be graded during the rainy months.
f) Hydrology and hydraulic concerns and mitigations.
Major grading activities shall be scheduled during the dry season wherever possible, or as
otherwise approved by the Department cf Public Works.
65.
Soils stabilization, which may include revegetation of graded areas, shall occur within 30
days of Completion of grading activities as directed by the Department of Public WOrks.
66. The site shall be watered during grading operations to control dust.
R:~S P~Harveston SP~PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
8
67.
Temporary drainage and sediment control devices shall be installed as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
68.
An impod/export route shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works pdor to
issuance of any grading permit. The plan shall include limitation to the duration of the
grading operation and construction activities, a Traffic Control Plan, and a daily time
schedule of operations.
69.
Pdor to issuance of any grading permit, a soils reports shall be submitted to the Department
of Public Works for review and approval, to address engineering, geologic, seismic, and
soils engineering concerns for each tentative map or commercial parcel map for each phase
of proposed development.
70.
A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared bY a registered engineer or engineering geologist
and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site
including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
71.
All public streets shall be maintained and cleaned if necessary on a daily basis dudng
grading operation and construction activities. Cash deposit, letter of credit or posting of bond
to guarantee maintenance of all public rights-of-way affected by the grading operations and
construction activities, shall be posted prior to issuance of grading permits.
72.
If subsequent Geotechnical and Soils Reports determine that dewatedng of the site is
necessary during construction, necessary permits (ie. in compliance with NPDES permit)
shall be obtained from appropriate agencies pdor to approval of the grading plans.
PHASING
73. Construction of the development permitted bythe Specific Plan, including recordation of final
subdivision maps, may be carried out in stages provided that, adequate vehicular access is
constructed for all dwelling units in each stage of development and further provided that
such development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan
Phasing Plan.
74.
Development applications shall be submitted for each planning unit in each phase. Total
acreage and land uses within each phase shall be substantially in accordance with the
specifications of the Specific Plan.
75.
The Developer shall be permitted to seek a reimbursement agreement for qualifying facilities
and improvements, as the same are authorized in Condition 6 of the Resolution. The City
and the Developer shall proceed in good faith to allocate appropriate reimbursements to the
Developer pursuant to the City's then enforceable ordinance applicable to such
reimbursement.
76. PHASE I
a. CIRCULATION
The following improvements shall be completed as part of Phase 1 and prior to 1 st building
permit in Phase 2.
i. Improve Date Street from Margarita Road to the Major Entry at Date Street
(Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include dedication of half-
R:\S P~larveston SP~PC Docs\COA*SP.doc
9
width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements,
paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing
and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14
foot wide raised landscaped median
ii. Improve the Major Entry at Date Street from Date Street to Loop Road
(Modified Major Highway Standards - 100' RAN) to include dedication of full-
width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb
and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping,
utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wide
raised landscaped median
iii. Improve the Loop Road from Major Entry at Date Street to School Site
Modified Collector Road Standards - 66' RJVV) to include dedication of full-
width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb
and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping,
utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer)
iv. Improve northbound Margarita Road from Santa Gertrudis Creek to the
southerly boundary of Tract Map No. 21340 (Arterial Highway Standards -
110' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving,
curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and
striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot
wide raised landscaped median.
CIRCULATION
The following improvements shall be completed prior to the first occupancy permit in
Phase I
i. Improve the Loop Road from the Major Entry at Margarita Road to the
westerly boundary of Planning Area 5 ( Modified Collector Road Standards -
66' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-
width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights,
drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to
water and sewer)
1. Provide an Eastbound Free Right Turn Lane from the Loop Road
onto the Major Entry at Margarita Road
ii. Improve Southbound Margarita Road from Santa Gertrudis Creek to Date
Street (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include dedication of half-
width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements,
paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing
and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14
foot wide raised landscaped median.
iii. Improve the Major Entry at Margarita Road from Margarita Road to Loop
Road (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 106' RAN) to include
dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage
facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and
sewer), and a 20 foot wide raised landscaped median
iv. Improve the Minor Entry at Margarita Road from Margarita Road to Loop
Road (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 82' RA~) to include
dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage
facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and
R:~S P~-Iarveston SP~PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
10
sewer)
v. Improve the Village Center Road from the Loop Road to the Major Entry at
Margarita Road (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 65' FI,~/) to
include dedication of full-width dght-of-way~ installation of full-width street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage
facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and
sewer)
The following improvements shall be completed pdor to the first occupancy permit in
Phase t of the Service Commercial area
vi. Improve Ynez Road from the southerly Specific Plan boundary to Equity
Drive (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/~V) to include dedication of half-
width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements,
paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing
and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14
. foot wide raised landscaped median.
vii. On or before January 1,2003 the Developer shall reserve for the City's use
or commitment to use the same for freeway intemhange and/or freeway-
related traffic circulation purposes, a component of real property that is:
(i) approximately twenty (20) contiguous acres in area;
(ii) identified and defined by the City Engineer of City of Temecula;
(iii)
reserved for a twenty (20) year pedod for the purpose of offedng a
permanent dedication for freeway related purposes to the City of
Temecula if and when the City represents to Developer that a
freeway intemhange is to be constructed on the burdened property.
Any portion of the Reserved real property shall be released from the
reservation at the time the City determines such real property is not
necessary for the freeway improvements. "Reservation" shall mean
the Owner an/or Developer of the subject real property shall not
improve the real property but shall instead maintain the property in a
non-nuisance condition and in an undeveloped/unimproved state
during the term of the Reservation. The Owner or Developer shall
submit an enforceable written instrument so burdening the subject
real property for the review and approval of the City Attorney and
Director of Public Works prior to, and have the same approved, in
such time so as to allow the Reservation to be enfomeable on or
before January 1,2003.
OFFSITE CIRCULATION
Prior to issuance of 326th occupancy permit for the Phase I Residential and more
than 8 acres of Phase 1 Service Commercial development (southern portion of
Planning Area 12), the developer(s) shall implement the improvements for the
following:
i, Improve the intersection of Winchester Road at Ynez Road
1. Add Eastbound Through Lane
2. Add Southbound Right Turn Overlap Phase
3. Modify Signal to Provide Northbound Right Turn Overlap Phase
R:~S P~Harveston SP'~PC Docs~COA-SP.dOC
11
ii.
Improve the intersection of Winchester Road at Margarita Road
1. Add Right Turn Lane and Modify Signal to Provide Southbound Right
Turn Ovedap Phase
2. Add Eastbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left)
do
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Prior to the first occupancy perrn t or as warranted, the developer shall.insta
a traffic signal with conduits for future interconnect at the following
intersections:
2.
3.
4.
5.
e. DRAINAGE
i.
Margarita Road and Major Entry at Margarita Road
'Major Entry at Margarita Road and Loop Road
Margarita Road and Date Street
Date Street and Major Entry at Date Street
Modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road
and Rustic Glen Ddve
Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated
improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District and the City of Temecula
WATER AND SEWER
i. Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and
sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements
77.
PHASE 2.
a. CIRCULATION
The following improvements sha!l be completed as part of Phase 2 and prior to first
building permit in Phase 3.
i. Improve Date Street from the Major Entry at Date Street to the westerly
boundary of Planning Area 3 (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W)
to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of haft-width
street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights,
drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to
water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median.
ii. Improve the Loop Road from Major Entry at Date Street to the westerly
boundary of Planning Area 5 (Modified Collector Road Standards - 66' R/W)
to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage
facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and
sewer).
iii. Improve Ynez Road from Equity Drive to Service Commercial Access III
(Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width
right-of,way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and
gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
R:~S P~Harveston SP'~PC Docs\COA-SP,doc
12
iv.
(including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wide raised
landscaped median.
On or before January 1,2003 the Developer shall reserve for the City's use
or commitment to use the same for freeway intemhange and/or freeway-
related traffic circulation purposes, a component of real property that is:
a) approximately twenty (20) contiguous acres in area;
b) identified and defined by the City Engineer of City'of Temecula;
c)
reserved for a twenty (20) year period for the purpose of offering e
permanent dedication for freeway related purposes to the City of
Temecula if and when the City represents to Developer that a
freeway interchange is to be constructed on the burdened property.
Any portion of the Reserved real property shall be released from the
reservation at the time the City determines such real property is not
necessary for the freeway improvements. "Reservation" shall mean
the Owner an/or Developer of the subject real property shall not
improve the real property but shall instead maintain the property in a
non-nuisance condition and in an undeveloped/unimproved state
during the term of the Reservation. The Owner or Developer shall
submit an enforceable written instrument so burdening the subject
real property for the review and approval of the City Attorney and
Director of Public Works pdor to, and have the same approved, in
such time so as to allow the Reservation to be enforceable on or
before January 1,2003.
v. Improve Equity Ddve from County Center Drive to the new Ynez Road
(Modified Principal Collector Road Standards -78' R/W) to include to include
dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage
facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and
sewer)
OFFSITE CIRCULATION
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for the Phase II build-out of Residential
(defined as issued building permits in excess of 476 for single family detached units
and 346 for attached multiple family units) and Service Commercial (defined as
development that involves real property that in the aggregate exceeds twenty (20)
net acres of real property within Planning area 12) and Village Center neighborhood
commercial (beyond an aggregate of eight thousand (8000) square feet of
developed area) the improvements generally described hereafter shall have been
completed to the reasonable satisfaction of the City and the Developer shall be
authorized to seek a reimbursement agreement as provided for in condition 6, unless
waived pursuant to condition 6.
i. Winchester Road at Jefferson Avenue
1. Add Eastbound Right Turn Lane
) 2. Add a Southbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left)
3. Convert Southbound Right Turn Lane to Shared Through and Right
Turn Lane
R:~S P',Harveston SF~PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
13
4. Add Northbound Right Turn Lane (Dual Right)
ii. Winchester Road at 1-15 Southbound Ramp
1. Add Eastbound Right Turn Lane
2. Add Southbound dedicated Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) and widen off
ramp to accommodate the added lane
iii. Winchester Road at Ynez Road
1. Add Eastbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left)
2. Add Eastbound Through Lane
3. Add Northbound Left Turn Lane (Triple Left)
4. Modify Signal to PrOvide Northbound Right Turn Overlap Phase
5. Split Northbound and Southbound Signal Phases
6, Add Westbound Through Lane
7. Add Southbound Shared Through and Right Turn Lane (300'
Minimum)
iv, Overland Drive at Jefferson Avenue
1. Modify Signal to Provide Westbound Right Turn Overlap Phase
2. Modify Signal to Provide Northbound Right Turn Overlap Phase
3. Split Northbound and Southbound Signal Phases
4. Add Eastbound Right Tum Lane
v. Overland Drive at Ynez Road
1. Add Westbound Right Turn Lane
2. Modify Westbound Shared Through and Right Turn Lane to Through
Lane
3. Modify Signal to Provide Westbound Right Turn Overlap Phase
4, Modify Signal to Provide Southbound Right Turn Overlap Phase
vi. Overland Drive at Margarita Road
1. Modify Northbound Through Lane to Shared Through and Left Turn
Lane
2, Split Northbound and Southbound Signal Phases
vii. Winchester Road at I-15 Northbound Ramp
· 1, Add Westbound right turn lane (Dual right)
CITY OF MURRIETA CIRCULATION
A fair-share contribution shall be made to the City of Murrieta prior to the first
occupancy permit in Phase 2 to improve the intersection of:
i. Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jefferson Avenue
1. Add Westbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left)
2, Channelize Northbound Right Turn Lane to Allow Free Right Turn
Movement
R:~S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP,doc
14
ii. Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Alta Murrieta Drive
1. Add Westbound Right Turn Lane
2. Modify Westbound Shared Through and Right Turn Lane to Right
Turn Only Lane
iii. Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Margarita Road
1. Modify Eastbound Through Lane to Shared Through Lane/Right Turn
Lane
2. Modify Northbound Through Lane to Shared Through Lane/Left Turn
Lane
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
i. Prior to the first occupancy permit, or as warranted, the developer shall install
a traffic signal with conduits for future interconnect at the following
intersections:
1. Date Street and Major Entry at Date Street
DRAINAGE
i. Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated
improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District and the City of Temecula requirements.
78.
f. WATER AND SEWER
i. Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and
sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements.
PHASE 3
a. CIRCULATION
The following improvements shall be completed as part of Phase 3 and prior to the
first building permit in Phase 4:
i. Improve Date Street from the westedy boundary of Planning Area 3 to Ynez
Road (Urban Artedal Highway Standards - 134' PAN) to include dedication of
full-width street right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements,
paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing
and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14
foot wide raised landscaped median
1. Provide Eastbound Right Turn Lane onto Ynez Road per EIR ID. No.
32
2. Provide Westbound Right Turn Lane onto Ynez Road per EIR ID. No.
32
ii. Improve Yne~ Road from Service Commercial Access III to Date Street
(Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include dedication of full-width
right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and
gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wide raised
landscaped median
1. Provide Southbound Right Turn Lane onto Date Street per EIR ID. No.
37
R:\S P~Harveston SP~PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
15
2. Provide Northbound Right Turn Lane onto Date Street per EIR ID. No.
iii. On or before January 1,2003 the Developer shall reserve for the City's use
or commitment to use the same for freeway intemhange and/or freeway-
related traffic cimulation purposes, a component of real property that is:
a) approximately twenty (20) contiguous acres in area;
d) identified and defined by the City Engineer of City of Temecula;
79.
ii.
iii.
c) reserved for a twenty (20) year period for the purpose of offering a
permanent dedication for freeway related purposes to the City of
Temecula if and when the City represents to Developer that a
freeway interchange is to be constructed on the burdened property.
Any portion of the Reserved real property shall be released from the
reservation at the time the City determines such real property is not
necessary for the freeway improvements. "Reservation" shall mean
the Owner an/or Developer of the subject real property shall not
improve the real property but shall instead maintain the property in a
non-nUisance condition and in an undeveloped/unimproved state
during the term of the Reservation. The Owner or Developer shall
submit an enforceable written instrument so burdening the subject
real property for the review and approval of the City Attorney and
Director of Public Works pdor to, and have the same approved, in
such time so as to allow the Reservation to be enf0rceabie on or
before January 1,2003.
DRAINAGE
i. Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated
improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District and the City of Temecula requirements.
WATER AND SEWER
i. Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and
sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements.
PHASE 4
a. CIRCULATION
The following improvements shall be completed as part of Phase 4.
i. Improve Date Street from Ynez Road to Interstate 15 (Urban Arterial
Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include dedication of full-width right-of-
way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter,
sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 ~oot wde raised
landscaped median
Improve Ynez Road from Date Street to the northerly Specific Boundary
(Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include dedication of full-width
right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and
gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wide raised
landscaped median
All necessary right-of-way in Planning Areas 8 and 12, including slope areas
R:~S P~Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
16
for the Date/Cherry Interchange shall be grant~ free and clear of
encumbrances in fee rifle. The location and limits of the right-of-way shall be
as approved by the City and the California Department of Transportation.
DRAINAGE
i. Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated
improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District and the City of Temecula
c. WATER AND SEWER
i. Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and
sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this Specific Plan. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
80.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans ara reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
81.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division
per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water
system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour
duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect
changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all
information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
82.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix 'III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade
of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B
83.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land
division per CFC Appendix Ill-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project,
a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a
4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to
reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as
approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into
account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
84.
R:~S P~-Iarveston SP\PC DOcs\COA-SP.doc
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access read(s) frontage to a hydrant. The
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade
of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
85.
Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial.
(CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4)
86.
87.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be bt~ilt s',]all have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
88.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
89.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have a clear paved section of thirty-six (35) feet
and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches.
(CFC 902.2.2.1).
90.
91.
Private roads and alleys may be as narrow as 20 feet unobstructed travel width, not
including parking with Fire Prevention approval on a map by map basis.
Cul-de-sacs with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed travel width around the
planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible provided that they meet the
80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level.
92.
The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
93.
All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are
prohibited, except those approved individually on a map by map basis when they maintain
the required travel widths and radii.
94.
95.
96.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
R:',S P~-Iacveston SP~PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
97.
98.
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901 i~'.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, 'Blue Reflective Markers'
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
99.
100.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for all apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile
home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex
which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers,
and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications
shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
101.
102.
103.
104.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a 'Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
105.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, building final or occupancy, buildings
housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of Uniform Fire Code
Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. The storage of
high-piled combustible stock may require structural design considerations or modifications to
the building. Fire protection and life safety features may include some or all of the following:
an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. (CFC Article 81)
R:~S P~Harvest0n $P\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
106.
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doom and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81 )
107.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other h~:'~rdous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
108. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the wildland-
vegetation interface. (CFC Appendix II-A)
109. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall
include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block
walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A)
t 10. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and
to the Fire Prevention Bureau for some commercial occupancies. This report shall address,
but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13,
24, 72 and 231-C.
111. Prior to issuance of a building construction in each phase a simple plot plan or map in an
electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
Alternative file formats may be accoptable, contact fire prevention for approval.
112. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities a. pproved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
113. The applicant shalr submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of
Environmental Health. and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
General Requirements:
114. If any of the following conditions of approval differ from the Specific Plan text or exhibits, the
conditions enumerated herein shall take precedent.
115. The current park dedication requirement (Quimby) shall be satisfied with the 16.5 acre
community park, the existing Winchester Creek Park and the HOA owned and maintained
R:~S P~larveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc
20
recreational areas identified in the Harveston Specific Plan including the 6.9 acre Lake Park,
the 1.8 acre Village Green, the 2 acre Village Club and the mini parks totaling 1.5 acres.
116.
The actual design of the 16.5 acre community park in Planning Area I shall be in substantial
conformance with the conceptual designs and guidelines identified within the Specific Plan.
Prior to submittal of construction plans, the developer shall meet with the Director of
Community Services to determine the location and specifications of the park amenities to be
provided on site. Construction plans and specifications must be approved by the Director of
Community Services.
117.
All park and slope/landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with
the City of Temecula Landscape and Irrigation Specifications and Installation Details and the
Park Land and Landscape Dedication Process.
118. The design of the community park in Planning Area 1 shall provide for pedestrian cimulation
and access for the disabled throughout the park.
119.
120.
Construction of the 16.5 acre community park site and proposed TCSD landscape
maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and
TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection
process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance programs.
The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for all
maintenance of the park sites and slopes/landscaping areas until such time as those
responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD.
121.
122.
123.
124.
The 16.5 acre community park shall be improved and dedicated to the City free and clear of
any liens, assessment fees, or easements that would preclude the City from utilizing the
property for public purposes. A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall
also be provided with the conveyance of the property.
All perimeter slope/landscape areas adjacent to roadways with a 65 foot right of way or
larger adjacent to single family residential development shall be offered for dedication to the
TCSD for maintenance purposes following compliance to existing City standards and
completion of the application process. All other landscape areas, entry monumentation,
signage, pedestrian portals, bus shelters and walls shall be maintained by the Homeowners
Association (HOA), private maintenance association or property owner.
A ten (10) foot wide multi-use trail will be constructed around the Lake Park. An 8' paseo will
be constructed within the Paseo Park and along the outside of the Loop Road.
Class II bicycle lanes will be included on both sides of Ynez Road, Date Street (within the
project area), the Loop Road and the three entrance roads, and the adjacent portions of
Margarita Road and Date Street (bordering the County line). Class II bike lanes shall be
constructed in concurrence with the street improvements.
125.
The developer is entitled to receive a credit against the park component of the City's
Development Impact Fee (DIF) based upon the actual cost of improving the community park
in Planning Area 1. The fee/credit issue shall be addressed pursuant to the execution of a
Development Agreement or a Park Improvement Agreement between the applicant and the
City prior to approval of the final map.
126. The 16.5-acre community park in Planning Area 1 shall be constructed, including the 90-day
R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-$P.doc
21
maintenance and establishment period, and the conveyance accepted by the City Council
prior to the issuance of the fimt residential building permit in Phase 2 (excluding models).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the completion of the 16.5 acre Community Park is delayed
because the final and permanent alignment of Ynez Road has not been determined which
prevents the designation of the boundaries of the subject park, the City may, in the
reasonable discretion of the City Manager and which shall not be unreasonably withheld,
continue to issue building permits during the term of such uncertainty. The City Manager
may require, and the Owner or Developer shall provide, the provision of notice to potential
purchasers of the scope of improvements intended to occur within the subject park,
including, but not limited to, lighted athletic fields. Notice, as required by the City Manager,
may include, but is not limited to, signage (both on and off the anticipated park site), letters,
displays or handbills.
Prior to Approval of the Final Map:
127.
128.
The developer, or his assignee, shall offer for dedication, enter into an agreement and post
security with the TCSD to improve the proposed parkland located in Planning Area I in
accordance with the City standards, prior to the approval of the respective final map.
All areas intended for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance shall be identified 'on each
final map by numbered lots and indexed to identify said lots numbers as a proposed TCSD
maintenance areas.
129. All TCSD slope/landscaping maintenance easements shall be offered for dedication on each
final map.
130.
Construction drawings for all landscape medians and proposed TCSD slope/landscape
m.aintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services
pnor to the approval of each final map.
131.
132.
The subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all landscape
medians and proposed TCSD maintenance areas prior to the approval of each final map.
The developer shall file a notice of intention with the Temecula Community Services District
to initiate election proceedings for acceptance of residential street lights and perimeter
slope/landscape into the TCSD maintenance program prior to approval of each final map.
All costs associated with this process shall be borne by the developer.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits:
133.
Prior to the installation of street lights or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first,
the developer shall file an application and pay the appropriate fees to the TCSD for the
dedication of artedal and residential street lights into the appropriate TCSD maintenance
program.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy:
134.
Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within each phase map, the
developer shall submit the most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the
final project.
135. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence or
TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers.
R:~S P~Harveston Sp~.oC Docs\COA-SP,doc
22
OUTSIDE AGENCY LE3'rERS
136. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated March 31, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
137. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho Water
transmittals dated November 9, 1999 and September 8, 2000, a copy of which is attached.
138.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated February 1,2000, a copy of which is
attached.
139.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated January 1,2000, a copy of which
is attached.
140. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated November 15, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
141.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Information
Center, Department of Anthropology transmittal dated November 3, 1999, a copy of which is
attached.
142. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Temecula Valley
Unified School District transmittal dated November 5, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
143. Comply with the terms and conditions of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and Army Corps of
Engineer permits obtained for this project.
144. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated May 31,2001, a copy of which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read; understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:~S P~larveston SP~PC Docs\COA*SP.doc
23
Board o£ Directors
David J. Slawson
Flee President
Clayton A. Record, Jr.
Marion E Ashley
Richard IL Hall
Rodger D. Stems
Board Sect~etar2;
Map/C. White
General Manager
John B. Bmdin
Director of the
Metropolitan ~Vater
District of So. Calif,
Clayton A. Record, Jr.
Joseph J. Kuebler. CPA
Legal Counsel
Redwine and Sherrill
October 4, 2000
County of Riverside
Environmental Health Department
P.O. Box 1206
Riverside, CA 92502
Dear Colleague:
la, e:
SAN53-Sewer Will Serve
1,921 Units, Located west of Margarita Rd., north of Date St.
in the County of Riverside.
EMWD is willing to provide water and/or sewer service to the subject project. The
provisions of service are contingent upon the developer completing the necessary
arrangements in accordance with EMWD rules and regulations. The arrangements
may include plan check, facility construction, annexation, payment of financial
participation charges, coordination with a sub-agency, reclaimed water facilities and
other requirements. The developer should contact EMWD's New Business
Development Department early in the process to determine the necessary
arrangements for service.
EMWD's ability to serve is subject to limiting conditions, such as water shortages,
regulatory requirements, legal issues, or conditions beyond EMWD's control.
Thank you for your cooperation in serving our mutual customers. If you have any
questions, please call me at (909) 928-3777, ext. 4518.
Civil Engineering Assistant
New Business Development
MHS/
C:
Ms. Patty Anders
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
TemeCula, CA 92589-9033
Mailing .4ddress:
\ \ fpsnts2\J_\WORDPROC\WORD\NEW BUSI. ll\Will Serve\Year2000\marg&datest .doc
Post Office Box 8300 Pen'is. CA 9257-2-8300 Telephone: (909) 928-3777 Fax: (909) 928-6177
£ocatio,: 2270 Trumble Road Pen-is, CA 92570
Wa r
Ralph H. Daily
November 9, 1999
Patty Anders, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
SWEETWATER SPECIFIC PLAN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 161
VARIOUS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0418
AND PA99-0419
Dear Ms. Anders:
Please be advised that the above-referenced development is located
within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner along with the
construction of any required on-site and/or off-site water facilities.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
99~SB:mc303~F0t 2-T1 ~FCF
September 8, 2000
Patty Anders, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN
Dear Ms. Anders:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water DisMct (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner.
RCWD has reviewed the Specific Plan for the Harveston development. As stated
above, RCWD will provide water service to this project. The proposed demands
have been incorporated into both the RCWD Water Resource Master Plan and
Water Facilities Master Plan. These plans have been reviewed and adopted by the
District's Board of Directors.
The review of the above-referenced documents affirms that the water demand for
this area was evaluated and incorporated into the RCWD Master Plans.
Also, please refer to our letter of August 23, 2000 (copy enclosed) concerning the
proposed lake. RCWD highly recommends that the issue of utilizing reclaimed
water be completely addressed in the site master plan and specific plan.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
00~SB:at 158W012-TIWCF
Enclosure
TO:
FROM:
RE:
County of Riverside
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF EN~rIRONMENTAL HEALTH
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Patty Anders
GREGOR DELLENBACH, Interim Supervisor
DATE: February 1, 2000
SWEETWATER SPECIFIC PLAN
The Sweetwater Specific Plan dated September 1999 has been received and reviewed.
Will-serve letters from the water and sewering agencies will be required and the use of reclaimed water
on all parklands and other greenbelt zones and other landscaped zones is highly recommended.
In order to serve domestic water and provide sanitary sewer service to the project area, "will-serve"
letters from Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD)
respectively will be required.
Domestic water demands are calculated to be 2.02 MGD and wastewater flows to be 0.723 MGD. The
report advises that RCWD and EMWD can handle those demands. The report identifies that 254.7
acres of park, open space and school sites that should be eligible to receive reclaimed water. These
irrigation systems should be designed to accommodate a reclaimed water system.
The concerns regarding re-claimed water have not been addressed in the document reviewed.
Sincerely,
' re~gor~De~rzm Supervisor
GD:dr
(909) 955-8980
DAVID P. ZAPPE
General Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTy FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Te~mecula
Planning LJepartment
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention:
Ladies and Gentlemen:
1005 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE. CA 92501
<)09.955.1200
909.755.9965 FAX
The D stdct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities. The D strict a so does not p an check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for SUCh cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to terns of specific ~nterest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood
centre and dra nage fac t es wh ch cou d be cons tiered a ogical componen~or extension of a master plan system,
and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a genera nature is
provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
This pr~ject would not b,e impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regiona~ ~nterest propose&
This project involves D strict Master Plan fac lit es The District will accept ownership of such facilities on
written request of the C ty Facilities must be constructed to D strct standards and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
~ This pro'ect may propose channels storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that~
could ~e considered regonal in nature and/or a ogcal extension of the adopted
i~le, t~;T~ ~j~.~g~¢,,, Master Drainage Plan. The Distdct would consider acc_~p~i0~
ownersh pot such tacll~t~es on written request of [he City. Facilities must be constructed to utstnct
standards and Distdct plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check,
inspection and admin strative fees will be required.
V/'' This project is located within the limits of the District's ~0¢1.¢J~1'1~1~//~U,{t~d~.~'n V'FIt"l"~ATea
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopteq; app cad e tees t, noulCl be pa~d Dy cashier's
check or money order on y to the Flood Control District prior to ssuance of building or grading permits,
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Centre Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approva/should not be given until the
City has determineq [hat the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
f th s project nye ves a Federal Emergen,c.y Management Agency (FEM/~) mapp. ed fie. od plain, the. n the Ci~ s..h._o.u.l~d
require the app cant to provide all StuDies calculations plans and other ~nrorma[ion requireD to mee~ ~-,-~,
requirements and should further require that the app cant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
pdor to grading, recordat on or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Rev s on (LOMR) prior to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies
ind cat ng the pro eot is..e,x?mpt fro~ these requ rements A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification
may be required from ,,,e ,ocal Ca.ifornia Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404
permit.
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: I' I~.-OO
S'TATE OF CAU FOR~IA~BU~IN E~, TI~J~PO~... N AND HOUSING AGENGY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Sn, TRICT 8 th
W Fourth Sffeet, 6 Floor MS 726
Bemardino. CA 92401-1400
~---~HONE (909) 383-6327
FAX (909) 383-6890
November 15, 1999
08-Riv-79-R3.300
Ms. Patty Anders
Assistant Planner
PO Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Ms. Anders:
GRAY DAVtS, ~
Sweetwater Specific Plan
The City of Temecula should ensure that the applicant complies with the current
Congestion Management Program in place as defined by the Riverside County
Transportation Commission (1997).
Please forward all future plans and documents to this office regarding this proposal.
If you have any questions, please contact Jim Belty at (909) 383-4473 or FAX (909)
383-6890
Sincerely,
LINDA GRIMES, Chief
Office of Forecasting/
IGR/CEQA Review
c: Mosie Boyd, State Clearinghouse
~'ta(~u~Jf~ NGYed~r 3, 1999 11:26el -- Frog
SENT BY:UCR ~- 3-66 ;11:0?AN; ,ARCH RESEARC,. .T-* 90989464~'/;Ir 2
~ALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES .
Riverside, CA 92521-0418
INFORMATION
· YSTEM p~ (u~) ?~.~'74s
DATE:
· ~: Case Trammimd itefm~o~ Designation:
nmu~(.). A Phnn I ~ludy b m:;~modd.
~ A. Mm~ 1 m~hral m~n~e ~dy OdF # ) kkat~
of' · eehlrd ruow~e mam~n~m rqx~ b
__ iqu~ Ii
If you have any questions, ples~e contnct us.
RCE RK~
rem'~ in plato, ~r & ~..Limtion of b two4
November 5, 1999
TEMECULA VALLEY
Unified School District
NOV 1 6 1999
By
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Patti Smitfi
Richard Sharer
Ed Elder
Jerr~ Hobbs
Barbara Tooker
Ms. Patty Anders
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temeeula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT: PA99-0419 (Sweetwater)
Dear Ms. Anders:
Temecula Valley Unified st~ngly supports the inclusion of a twelve-acre elementary school within the proposed
Sweetwater Specific Plan. An elementary school within the community will be vital to serve the students generated
by the homes there, as well as other City of Temecula residents. There is a need to open this school as early as
August of 2000. As was discussed in an earlier meeting with City Manager Shawn Nelson, and Deputy City
Manager, Gary Thornhill~ this may require an acceleration of the school site portion of the specific plan.
Lenaar Communities has worked closely with the school dis~ct in establishing the location and configuration of the
school site shown in the proposed plan. The District encourages an expeditious approval of that aspect of the plan as
shown.
Sincerely,
Temecula Valley Unffied~School Distxict
Janet Dixon
Coordinator of Facilities Services
Cc: Dave Gallaher, Director of Facilities Services
31350 Rancho Vista Road / Temecula, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661
RTR I9:9096841007 MHY al'U1
May 31, 2001
Riverside Transit Agency
1825 Third Street
P.o. BOX 59968
Rivenide, CA 92517
Phone:(909) 68~08S0
Fa~ (909) 684-700?
City of Teanccula
Planning Dcpartmm!
I met recently with Matt Fagan to discuss thc Harveston Specific Plan, It appears that all
attempts have bccn made to design tile project in a ~ransit-friendly mnnncr, including thc
open-ended clustering o£residantlal units. The mixed.uses in the Village Green Center
· are also conduc/ve to transit usage..
We hope to jointly design a pilot program to encourage transit usage and thc usc of other
alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle. It would be banoficial for the community to
provide transit access to adjacent areas, such as thc Promenade Mall, middle and high
schools and local employment centers.
Please continue to keep us posted so we can maximize coordination ofplanning efforts.
Thank you for the opportunity to common! on this project.
Planning
EXHIBIT A-2
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP
R:~S PV:'larveston SP~'C Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc
23
I
EXHIBIT A-3
HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN
LAND USE MAP
R:~S P~la~eston SP~PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc
24
EXHIBIT B (For Attachment No. 2)
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT AND
ADOPTION OF THE ZONING STANDARDS
OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN
R:~S P~Harveston SP~C Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc
25
ATTACHMENT NO. B (For Attachment No. 2)~:* ~*
ORDINANCE NO. 01-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-
0418 (DEVELOMENT CODE AMENDMENT) AMENDING
SECTION 17.16.070 TO INCLUDE HARVESTON SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 13 AND ADOPT CHAPTER 11 (DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS) INCLUDING THE ZONING STANDARDS
INCLUDED THEREIN FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT FOR THE. HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO.
13, ON PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES
LOCATED ON THE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD
AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER
IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001, 910-
261-002, 910-110-013, 9 10-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,
910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-
009, 910-120-005, 910-120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-
630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911-180-002,
911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-
015, 911-180-023 AND 911-180-028.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Add the following to the end of the list contained in Section
17.16.070 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
"SP-12 Wolf Creek
SP-13 Harveston"
Section 2. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby adopts Chapter
11 of the Harveston Specific Plan, Development Standards as an uncodified ordinance.
Section 3. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the
City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and
cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. The City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby finds that the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and mitigation
monitoring reporting program is consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and that it accurately addresses the impacts associated with the adoption of
these two Ordinances implementing the Harveston Specific Plan.
Section 5. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of
this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall
hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
R:~S P~larveston SP~CTtty Council~DevCode&Zoning.-CC On:l.doc
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 8. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after
its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the
City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and
circulated in said City.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this day of 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk Of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 01- was duly introduced and placed upon
its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of
2001, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at
a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of
,2001 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNClLMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
R:~S P~-Inrveston SP~Cit¥ Council~DevCode.8~ning-.CC Ord.doc
2
EXHIBIT C (For Attachment No. 2)
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE FOR THE
CHANGE OF ZONE AND
AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND
R:~S P',Harveston SP~PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc
26
EXHIBIT C (For Attachment No. 2)
ORDINANCE NO. 01-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE ZONE CHANGE OF THE THREE
EXCLUDED PARCELS LOCATED WITHIN THE HARVESTON
SPECIFIC PLAN AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON PARCELS TOTALING 550
ACRES LOCATED ADJACENT TO INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND
SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-110-
013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910-
110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-005,
910-120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911-630-
003, 911-640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-
180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023
AND 911-180-028.
WHEREAS, Lennar filed Planning Application Nos. PA99-0418 and PA00-0295 (the
"Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development
Code, CEQA Guidelines and California State CEQA Guidelines;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on June 20, 2001,
at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on. ., 2001, at a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested
persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Council approved of the Application, subject to the recommended
conditions, together with the concurrent recommendation on the Harveston EIR and
adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the
Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan as amended;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Approve the removal of the three excluded parcels from the Harveston
Plan and approve the amendment to the official City Zoning map as shown substantially in
the form of Exhibit C-1.
R:xS l~Harveston SPeCify CouncilX CC Ord SP.doc
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The City CoUncil of the City of Temecula
has certified the Final Environmental Impact Report and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for the Harveston Specific Plan in order to approve the Application.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2001 - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 2001, by the
following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
R:~ P~Harveston SP~City Council~ CC Ord SP.doc
2
EXHIBIT C-1
PROPOSED ZONING MAP
R:~S P~Harveston SP~PC Docs~ PC STAFFRPT.doc
27
City of Temecula
Proposed Zoning
EXHIBIT D(ForAttachmentNo. 2)
CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCEFORTHE
DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT
R:~S P~-Iarveston SP~PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc
28
EXHIBIT D (For Attachment No. 2)
FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN
AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND LENNAR COMMUNITIES (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 00-0446)"
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
a. Lennar Communities ("Owner") filed Planning Application No PA00-0419
(General Plan Amendment), PA99-0418 (Specific Plan, Development Code Amendment
and Specific Plan Zoning Standards), PA 00-0189 (Environmental Impact Report), pa
99-0245 (Change of Zone), PA99-0446 (Development Agreement) PA00-0295
(Tentative Tract Map 29639), PA01-O030 (Tentative Tract Map 29928), PA01-
0031(Tentative Tract Map 29929) and PA01-0032 (Tentative Tract Map No. 30088 (the
"Application") in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code for land use approvals for a 550 acre planned community located adjacent to and
east of Interstate 15, north of Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road, south of
the northern City Limit ("Project~).
b. Government Code Section 65864 authorizes the City to enter into
binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real
property for the development of such property in order to, among other matters: ensure
high quality development in accordance with comprehensive plans; provide certainty in
the approval of development projects so as to avoid the waste of resources and the
escalation in the cost of housing and other development to the consumer; provide
assurance to the applicants for development projects that they may proceed with their
projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations and subject to
conditions of approval, in order to strengthen the public planning process and encourage
private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the private and public
economic costs of development; and provide for economic assistance to Owner for the
entitlements authorizing development related improvements.
c. On June 20, 2001 the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report,
the proposed Development Agreement(s) and the other land use applications for the
Project at which time all persons interested in the Draft EIR, proposed Development
Agreement and the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning
Commission on these matters.
R:~S P~Iarveston SP~City Council\CC Ord for DA .DOC I
d. Following consideration of the entire record of information
received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Development
Agreement and the Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2001- recommending to the City Council that the Development Agreement be approved,
subject to certain recommended conditions.
e. On ,2001 the City Council of the City of Temecula
held duly noticed public hearings on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, proposed
Development Agreement(s) and the other land use applications for the Project at which
time all persons interested in the proposed Development Agreement and the Project had
the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters.
f. Following consideration of the entire record of information
received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council,
and due consideration of the proposed Final EIR, General Plan Amendment, Change of
Zone, Code Amendment, Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance, Tentative Tract Maps (Level
A and B), and Development Agreement, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2001-
, entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula Certifying the
Environmental Impact Report Prepared for the Harveston Specific Plan No. 13 (Planning
Application No. 99-0418) and Related Actions, and Adoption of the Environmental
Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and a Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program in Connection Therewith."
Section 2.
and declares that:
The City Council of the City of Temecula further finds, determines
A. In consideration of the substantial public improvements and
benefits to be provided by Owner and the Project, in further consideration of the
implementation of the Harveston Specific Plan and in order to strengthen the public
financing and planning process and reduce the economic costs of development, by the
Development Agreement, the City intends to give Owner assurance that Owner can
proceed with the development of the Project for the Term of the Development
Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement and in
accordance with the City's General Plan, ordinances, policies, rules and regulations
existing as set forth in the Development Agreement. In reliance on the City's covenants
in the Development Agreement concerning the development of the Property, Owner has
and will in the future incur substantial costs in site preparation and the construction and
installation of major infrastructure and facilities in order to make the Project feasible.
B. The Development Agreement and the Existing Project Approvals,
as defined in the Development Agreement, implement the goals and policies of the City's
General Plan, and the Harveston Specific Plan, provide balanced and diversified land
uses, and impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land
development and usage in order to maintain the overall quality of life and the
environment within the City.
C. The City has engaged in extensive studies and review of the
potential impacts of the Project as well as the various potential benefits to the City by the
development of the Project and concluded that the Project is in the best interests of and
is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the City.
R:~S P~Harveston SP~City Council\CC Ord for DA .DOC 2
D. The Development Agreement is consistent with the City's General
Plan, and each Element thereof, and the City's Growth Management Action Plan, and
constitutes a present valid exercise of the City's police power.
E. The Development Agreement is being entered into pursuant to
and in compliance with the requirements of Government Code Section 65867.
occurred.
F. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have
Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves certain
agreement entitled "Development Agreement by and Between the City of Temecula and
Lennar Communites" and authorizes the Mayor to execute said agreement attached
hereto as Attachment 8.
Section 4. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares
that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.
Section 5. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be
published and posted in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,2001.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey Comerchero
Mayor
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R~S lAHarveston SIACily Council\CC (kd for DA .DOC
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 01- was duly introduced and placed upon its
first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _ day of
,2001, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was dul~, adopted and
passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of
2001 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
SUSAN JONES, CMC
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
R:~S P~arveston SP~City Council\CC Ord for DA .DOC 4