HomeMy WebLinkAbout91_099 PC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 91-099
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CiTY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO.
240 TO CONSTRUCT A 6,300 SQUARE FOOT
RESTAURANT (BUILDING PAD "B") ON A PARCEL
CONTAINING 5.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AND LYNDIE LANE AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 921-310-011.
WHEREAS, Red Robin International, Inc., filed Plot Plan No. 240 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
pertaining to said Plot Plan on October 7, at which time interested persons had
opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report
regarding the Plot Plan;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission Hearing, the Commission
approved said Plot Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
~ 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not
subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general
plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
S~STAFFRP~240.PP
6
(a)
There is a reasonable probability that the land
use or action proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
(c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior
to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest
portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of
the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and
meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code,
to wit:
(1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
a)
There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan
No. 240 proposed will be consistent with the
general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
S~STAFFRPT~240.PP
7
FINDINGS:
c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
(1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be
approved unless the following findings can be made:
a)
The proposed use must conform to all the
General Plan requirements and with all
applicable requirements of state law and City
ordinances.
b)
The overall development of the land is designed
for the protection of the public health, safety and
general welfare; conforms to the logical
development of the land and is compatible with
the present and future logical development of
the surrounding property.
(2) The Planning Commission, in approving the proposed
plot plan, makes the following findings, to wit:
There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan
No. 240 will be consistent with the City's future
General Plan, which will be completed in a
reasonable time and in accordance with State
law due to the fact that the proposed restaurant
is consistent with the existing zoning and the
SWAP Land Use Designation of Commercial.
There is not a likely probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, in that the proposed
restaurant is consistent with the existing zoning,
the SWAP Land Use Designation of
Commercial, and the permitted uses of the
surrounding area.
The proposed use or action complies with State
planning and zoning laws, in that the proposed
use complies with Ordinance No. 348.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use, in that the
S\STAFFRP'I~2.40. P P
8
proposed restaurant complies with the
standards of Ordinance No. 348.
The project as designed and conditioned will not
adversely affect the public health or welfare, in
that the Conditions of Approval include
mitigation measures.
The project is compatible with surrounding land
uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height,
intensity, and coverage creates a compatible
physical relationship with adjoining properties.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on
surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present or
planned land use of the area.
ho
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated rights-of-way which are open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic namely Lyndie Land
and Rancho California Road.
The project as designed and conditioned will not
adversely affect the built or natural environment
as determined in the expanded initial study
performed for Plot Plan No. 18.
The design of the project and the type of
improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or
use of the property within the proposed project.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan
proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is
compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding
property.
~ECTION 2_ Fnvironmc. ntal C~m.nliance.
An Initial Study prepared for Plot Plan No. 18 indicates that although the
proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a
S~TAFFRPT~240.PP
9
significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the
Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration was
adopted by the Planning Commission on November 19, 1990. Plot Plan No. 240 will not
result in additional impacts to the environment; therefore, the project is exempt from
CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3).
~ECTION .':t. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Plot Plan
No. 240 to construct a 6,300 square foot restaurant (Building Pad "B") located on the
northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane and known as Assessor's
Parcel No. 921-310-011 subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October 1991.
G~'~t~o/~nhill, Planning Director
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the
7th day of October 1991, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 5
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey, Ford, and
Chairman Hoagland
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
S~STAFFRPT~240.PP
lO
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No: 240
Project Description: 6.300 square foot restaurant
Assessor's Parcel No.:
The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for the development of a 6,300
square foot restaurant(Building Pad "B") within a 5.1 acre site known as Plot Plan
No. 18, Revision No. 1.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the
City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or
annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards,
or legislative body concerning Plot Plan No. 240. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the
City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to
promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to
cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to
defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization
contemplated by this approval. This approval shall expire on October 7, 1993.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown
on Plot Plan No. 240 marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these conditions.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall comply with the Fire Department's Conditions of Approval
outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated August 27, 1991.
The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Department's Conditions of
Approval which are included herein.
S\STAFFRPT~240,PP
11
8. The applicant shall comply with the requirements outlined in the Rancho California
Water District letter dated August 27, 1991.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements outlined in the Riverside County
Department of Health letter dated August 30, 1991.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans for Plot Plan 18 Revised prior to the issuance of
occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all
landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within
ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than
thirty (30) inches. Additional landscaping shall be provided as visual enhancement
along the project site's Lyndie Lane frontage. Additional landscaping provided
shall include a mixture of 24" box trees and 5 gallon minimum size shrubs. A total
of 5 each 25" box trees shall be provided on the Lyndie Lane frontage.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following additional plans shall be
submitted for Planning Department approval:
Landscaping and Irrigation Plans.
A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the
Planning Director prior to occupancy.
Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit
B.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit B (Color Elevations) and the Materials
Board.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material
shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with
masonry block and a steel gate which screens the bins from external view.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and
shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655.
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall
comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat
Mitigation fee required by that ordinance which is based on the gross acreage of
the parcels proposed for development. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded
S\STAFFRPT~?.40.PP
12
by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees
required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the
Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
19.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be
determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of
plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate
maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed with the Department of
Building and Safety.
20.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and
irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director
of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or
pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working
order.
21.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
Engineering Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the
true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways,
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
22.
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
23.
The developer shall submit two (2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the
Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code
and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of
S~STAFFRPT~240.PP
13
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer. The grading plan shall be coordinated with all plans related to Plot Plan
No. 18.
The developer shall submit two (2) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions
of the site.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans for Plot Plan No. 18
being substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the
City Engineer.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted
and approved by the Engineering Department.
All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street
improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans.
Street improvement plans including parkway trees and street lights prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer shall be required for
all public streets prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit. Final plans and
profiles shall show the location of existing utility facilities within the right-of-way.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an
encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times
with adequate detours during construction.
If construction for street, on-site parking, grading and drainage improvements for
Plot Plan No. 18 has not begun, the subdivider shall construct or post security and
an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following
public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping,
traffic signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities.
S~STAFFRPT~240,PP
14
c. Landscaping (streets).
d. Sewer and domestic water systemsr
e. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines.
34.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
35.
A detailed drainage study will be required to be submitted to and approved by the
City Engineer. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City
Engineer. This study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall
include existing, interim, and proposed conditions, including hydrology and
hydraulic calculations. The drainage study shall also address the capacity of
existing downstream systems within Parcel Map No. 23687, and a secondary
overland drainage escape route.
36.
As determined from the drainage study, the developer shall construct or enlarge
off-site drainage facilities to mitigate any increase or diversion of existing flows
from the project site into adjacent downstream properties. Adequate drainage
easements shall be secured if needed. Mitigation shall be as directed by the City
Engineer.
37.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
38.
All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted
through the undersidewalk drains.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
39.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils
Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
40.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
41.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee
S~STAFFR PT~240.PP
15
to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an
interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the
project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for
payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer.
Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to
secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00
per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said
Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated
(assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this
Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this
Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the
process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this
project; l;).Ezv.~[ed that developer is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
42.
Prior to building permit, the subdivider shall notify the City's C.A.T.V. Franchises of
the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to C.A.T.V. Standards prior to
issuance of Certificates of Occupancy.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
43.
An on-site improvement plan per City Standards for the private parking lot and
drives shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer.
44.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards and
shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County
Standard 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk).
45.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the City
Engineer.
46.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along all public street frontages in
accordance with Riverside County Standard Nos. 400 and 401.
47.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum
of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved
by the City Engineer.
48.
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C.
pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all
adjacent public streets.
S~STAFFRPT~2.40. PP
16
49.
Lyndie Lane shall be improved with a minimum of 37 feet of part-width street
improvements within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County
Standard No. 111 (56'/78').
50.
Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No.
805.
51.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
Transportation Engineering
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
52.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer for Rancho California Road with transitions, and
shall be included in the street improvement plans.
53.
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California Road and
Lyndie Lane and shall be included in the street improvement plans with the second
plan check submittal.
54.
Plans for traffic signal interconnect shall be designed by a Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer and shown on the street improvement plans along
Rancho California Road from Lyndie Lane east to Moraga Road.
55.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for
the design requirements.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
56.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the City requirements and the
approved signing and striping plan.
57.
The traffic signal at Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane shall be installed and
operational per the City requirements, special provisions, and the approved traffic
signal plan.
58.
All traffic signal interconnects shall be installed per the City requirements and the
approved plan.
59.
The developer shall install the raised median on Rancho California Road from Via
Las Colinas east to Lyndie Lane.
S~STAFFRPT~240. PP
17
60.
No median break for the main driveway on Rancho California Road shall be
provided.
61.
The developer shall design and construct the signal at the intersection of Rancho
California Road and Lyndie Lane and may enter into a reimbursement agreement
with the City for a percentage of the total cost of this signal, as determined by the
City Engineer. The reimbursement agreement shall be based upon future
development of the 6.12 acre parcel to the south of this intersection as specified in
the addendum to the Traffic Study dated October 9, 1990 prepared by Robed
Kahn, John Kain and Associates.
Building and Safety. Department
62.
Comply with all applicable provisions of the 1988 edition of the Uniform, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes, 1990 edition of the National Electrical Code, California
Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Provisions and the Code of
the City of Temecula.
63. Obtain building address prior to Building plan review submittal.
S~TAFFRPT~240.PP
18
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPA . TMENT
210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370
(714) 657-3183
GLEN L NEWMAN
FIRE CHIEF
August 27, 1991
TO: CITY OF TEEECULA
ATTN: PLANNING DEPT
RE: PLOT PLAN 240
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced
plot plan, the Fire Department reco~anends the following fire protection
measures be provided in accordance w±th Riverside County Ordinances and/or
recognized fire protection standards:
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for
the remodel or construction of all co~ercial buildings using the
procedure established in Ordinance 546.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2500
GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure,
which must be available before any combustible material is placed
on the Job site.
3o
Water improvement plans have been submitted and approved under Plot
Plan 18. Hydrants needed for protection of this building must be
installed prior to any oombustible materials being placed on the Job
site.
e
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit
process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation
or built-in fire protection measures.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post
indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the
front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the
building(s). A statement that the building(s) will be automatically
fire sprinklered must be included on ths title page of the building
plans.
Install a supervised waterfow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans
must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to
installation, as per UBC.
[-~ INDIO OFFICE
79-733 Comar~ C~oS ~ Suite F, ~ CA 92201
(619) 342-8886 * FAX (619) 775-2072
PLANNING DMSION
~[~EMECUtA OFFICE
41002 Co4mq Ccxt~ I~,~, Su~c 225, Tcmecuh, CA 92390
(714) 694-5070 · FAX (714) 694-~076
PLOT PLAN 240 PAGE 2
7. A statement that the building will be automatically firs sprinklered
must appear on the titls page of the building plans.
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code. Low level Exit Signs, where exit signs are rsquired by
Section 3314(a).
9. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
10. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC.
Contact a certified sxCingnisher company for proper placement of equipment.
11.
Install a hood duct fire extinguishing system. Contact a certified fire
protsction company for propsr placemsnt. Plans must be approved by the
Fire Department prior to installation.
12.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall
be responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $558.00
to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
13.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit,
with the City of Temecula, a check or money order equaling the sum of
25¢ per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This
amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fees.
14. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in
:he Building and Safety Office.
Ail questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to
the Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Firs Departmsnt Planner
By
Laura Cabral, Firs Safety Specialist
LC/tm
August 27, 1991
Mr. Scott Wright
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43180 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SUB~EC'r:
Water Availability
APN 921-031-01!
Red Robin Restaurant
Dear Mr. Wright:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
R,-"dqCHO C/~LIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P. E.
Manager of Development Engineering
SB:SD:ajt201
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
Rancho California Water District
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TO: CITY OF TEMECULA
AIT~: ~tt Wrs~ht
F"OM: SAM MAET ['N'E~'~'~ ronmental
~: PLOT PLAN 240
DATE: 08-30-91
Health Specialist IV
The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Plot Plan No.
240 and ha~ no ob~ectlons. Sanltarv sewer and water
services should be available in this area. Prior to anv
bulldinq plan review for health clearance, the followxnq
items are r~qulred:
1. "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate
water and sewerlnq agencies.
A ~19~£~_9_1.9k~ from the Hazardous Services
Material Management Branch (Jon Mohoroski.
358-5055), will be required indicating that he
pro3ect has been cleared for:
a. Underground storage tanks
b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services
c. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance
with AB 2185)
d. Waste reduction management
SM:dr
cc: 3on Mohoroski. Hazardou~ Materials Branch