HomeMy WebLinkAbout91_105 PC ResolutionIESIENIllll IlL 91-11S
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECUIA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 13 CHANGING THE ZONE FROM
B-B-2T~ TO R-1 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RITA
WAY AND SERAPHINA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 914-260-
039, 040, 041, 042, 043, 044, 045, AND 046.
WIENEJiS, Dacin Development, Inc. tiled Change of Zone No. 13 in accordance with the
Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by
reference:
WIENERS, said Change of Zone application was processed in the time and manner
Prescribed by State and local law;
WIENFJiS, the Planning Commission considered said Change ef Zone on October 21,1991,
at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testily either in support or opposition;
WIENERS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended
denial ef said Change of Zone;
llW, THENmIL THE IlTY IF 1TMENIIA PUWNING IilIMISSIIN lIEN IESILVE, IETENMINE
lull liBEl AS FILIIWS:
SEClllR I. Hlifuln
THat the City ef Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following timings:
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general Plan
within thirty [30] months following incorporation. During that 30-month period ef time, the city is
not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that
its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the fullowing requirements are met:
A. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the Preparation of the general plan.
The planning agency finds, in approving prejects and taking other actJens, including the
issuance of building Permits, each of the following:
[1]
There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be
consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or StUdied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
[2)
There is little or no probability of substantial de~ment to or interference with the
future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
(3)
The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements ef
state law and lecal erdinances.
lfl
The Riverside CountY General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area CommunitY Plan,
[hereinafter 'SWAP"] was adopted prior to the incorporafion ef Temecufa as the General Plan for
the southwest portion of Riverside CountY, including the area now within the boundaries ef the
CitY. Ar this fi,e, the City has adopted SWAP as ils General Plan guidelines while the City is
proceeding in a timely fashion with the Preparation of its General Plan.
The Planning Commission in recommending denial of the proposed Change of Zone, makes the
follewing findings, to wit:
The proposed zone change may have a significant adverse effect on the environment, as a
result of potential future impacts fram the French Valley Airport.
There is a reasonable probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with, the
future and adopted General Plan, if the proposed use or acfion is ultimately inconsistent
with the plan. The project may be of significant scope in the context of city-wide and
regional development patterns.
The proposed change in district classification fram R-R-2½ to R-lwill likely be consistent
with the goals, pelicies and actJen programs which will be contained in the General Plan
when it is ultimately adopted. The density and rand use preposed are censlstent with the
Southwest Area Plan [SWAP] recommendations for the subject property. Further, densities
and uses proposed are similar te existing densities and uses in the vicinity of the projecL
The site of the proposed change in dis~ict classification may not be suitable to
accommodate all the land uses currently permitted in the proposed zoning districL
Possible land use cenflicts may arise as the Preject prepeses residential uses that are tho
dense according to the interim guidelines of the 4.LU.C.
L
Adequate access exists for the proposed residenfial land use from Rita Wav and
SeraPhina Road. Additional internal access and required road improvements abutting
preposed lots will be designed and constricted in conformance with City standards.
Said findings are supported by analysis, minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorPorated by reference.
The Airport Land Use Commission is making substantfal progress toward the completion
Of the French Valley Airporf Land Use Plan.
H. There is a reasonable probability that the project wifi be inconsistent with the plan.
There Is a probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the plan, If the
project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
4. The Change of Zone may not be compafible with the health, safetY and welfare of the community.
SEClill 2. F. Ivirplneltll Clnplllnel.
The Planning Commission has determined that future impacts relative to the French Valley Airport may be
sJgnificanL The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council should uphold the determinafion
of denial rendered by the A.LU.C.
STAF~BPTT13.CZ
11
SE~111113. BInlIBIIilUIL
fi]at the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends denial of Zone Change No. 13 to
change the zoning on 35.5 acres of land Irom B-9-2½ to B-lon pzoperty generally located at the northwest
comer of Rite Way and Seraphina Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 914-260-039, 040, 041, 042, 643,
044, 045, AND 046.
SED11AB4.
PASSED, DENIAL ADD ADOPTED this 21st day of October 1991.
Gary fi]o~'nhill, Planning Director
I IEBEBY CF. B11FY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 21st day of October, 1991 by the following vote of the
Commission:
AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS Blair, Fahey, goagland
NOES: 2 COMMISSIONERS Cbiniaeff, Ford
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS None