HomeMy WebLinkAbout092602 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the
office of the City Clerk at (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]
CALL TO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL:
AGENDA
TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
TO BE HELD AT
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California
Thursday, September 26, 2002 at 6:00 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Katan, Wedel, Connerton, Lanier
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not
listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission
about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with
the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the
Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote.
There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request
specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of August 22~ 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of August 22, 2002.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Multi-Way Stop Signs - North General Kearny Road at Golden Rod Road
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend:
I. That the present level of traffic control be maintained at the intersection of North
General Kearny Road and Golden Rod Road; and
2. That the LED speed limit advisory signs be installed on North General Kearny Road
just east and west of Golden Rod Road in compliance with the City's policy.
3. Pedestrian Bridge over Winchester Road at Nicolas Road
RECOMMENDATION: ~
3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review the feasibility study for a pedestrian bridge
over Winchester Road at Nicolas Road, and make recommendations to the City Council.
4. Traffic Engineer's Report
5. Police ChieFs Report
6. Fire Chief's Report
7. Commission Reports
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday,
October 24, 2002, at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
2
ITEM NO. 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR
MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
AUGUST 22, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting
at 6:19 P.M., on Thursday, August 22, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula
City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
FLAG SALUTE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Katan.
ROLLCALL
Present:
Commissioners Connerton, Katan, *VVedel, and
Chairman Lanier.
Absent:
Commissioner Coe.
Also Present:
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
Senior Engineer Moghadam,
Associate Engineer Gonzalez,
Fire Captain McBride,
Fire Apparatus EngineedParamedic Buckley,
Police Chief Domenoe,
Police Lieutenant Pingel,
Police Sergeant Lohman,
Administrative Secretary Pyle, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
* (It is noted that Commissioner Wedel arrived at 6:21 P.M.)
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Presentation by Fire Captain Fire Captain McBride - Fire Mappin~l Program,
Demonstration/History of Development
It is noted that Commissioner Wedel arrived at 6:21 P.M.
Fire Captain McBride relayed a brief history of the development of the Fire Mapping
Program, highlighting the original concept to implement this program in Temecula Fire
Department vehicles by Mayor Pro Tem Stone; provided additional information regarding
the access to mapping, to permits, and to the internet with the program, and the future
plan to utilize fire modeling analysis, and to operate a Reverse 9-1-1 System; and noted
that the installation in the vehicles would be completed when a specialty bracket needed
for mounting the systems was received.
Via overheads, Fire Apparatus Engineer/Paramedic Buckley provided a demonstration
of the mapping program, demonstrating the mapping system for residences, parcels,
businesses, the access to emergency phone numbers for businesses, hydrant location,
as well as floor plan information, and routing and directional mapping; noted the
updating process, and the potential for clipboard use separate from the vehicle in order
to better facilitate medical treatment; for Chairman Lanier, confirmed that the City of
Temecula had taken the lead in the County regarding implementing this type of program,
Fire Captain McBride advising that no fire department in the State had a system as
sophisticated as this particular program, and that the possibilities of access are near
limitless with this program, including the potential in 'the future to be able to dial up a
building's security camera in the event of a fire and see the fire inside.
Commissioner Connerton commended Mayor Pro Tem Stone for his innovative
recommendation, resulting in the expeditious installation of these systems in the Fire
vehicles; and additionally relayed kudos to the Fire Depadment for its diligent effods
regarding this program.
Fire Captain McBride noted gratitude to City staff, and in particular the Information
Systems Department and the GIS Department for their great work associated with
implementation of this program; and relayed that two of the units which currently have
the mapping program would be out in front of City Hall after the meeting in order that the
Commissioners could have the opportunity to observe how the program operates.
Presentation by Police Chief Domenoe -- Me.qan's Law Sex Offender Pin Maps
Updating the Public/Traffic Safety Commission regarding Megan's Law, Police Chief
Domenoe relayed that the City of Temecula now has an internet pin map accessible to
the public on the City's website, noting that the mapping provides the general location of
the residences of high-risk and serious registered sex offenders in the City of Temecula;
via overheads, demonstrated the manner in which the information was accessed;
clarified that not all of the registered sex offenders' crimes were related to rape or child
molestation; advised that in order to obtain more specific information the public could
access a Megan'.s Law Public Access Computer Program which would be installed in the
Old Town Temecula Storefront Police Office in the near future; and relayed that the City
of Temecula along with Riverside County participated in the Amber Alert System, and
that three overhead sign boards would be placed on freeways in Riverside County.
For Chairman Lanier, Police Chief Domenoe confirmed that the City of Temecula had 35
serious registered sex offenders and no high risk offenders; for Commissioner Katan,
noted that in the near future the Police Department would most likely implement a laptop
computer program for Police vehicles (similar to the previously presented program for
the Fire Department) which could provide the Police with important information (i.e., the
layout of a building, sex registrant information) via the GIS technology.
Fire Captain McBride relayed that after the Temecula's Fire Department's program has
been operational for a period of time, other agencies would also be implementing the
computer technology informational programs; and for Commissioner Connerton, noted
that the system currently has the capability for voice and handwritten recognition, and
that ultimately the Fire vehicles will receive Fire address information digitally and the
mapping will be provided when the call is sent through.
R~,t ra ~fi cmin ut es~ 82202 2
Commissioner Connerton noted the benefits of the Police Department having access to
the computer program technology in Police vehicles for safety purposes.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. .Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 25, 2002.
MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Commissioner Coe who was absent.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Request for Temporary On-Street Parkinq - Temeku Drive
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review a request to allow on-
street parking along a portion of Temeku Drive and make a
recommendation.
Commissioner Wedel advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this item.
Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the staff report (of record), highlighting the
request from the Temeku Hills Golf Club representatives for the issue of allowing
temporary on-street parking along a portion of Temeku Drive to be re-evaluated due to
construction activities; and provided an overview of the previous Public/Traffic Safety
Commission discussions when this issue was agendized in September and October of
1999, advising that these meeting minutes were included in the agenda material.
Addressing the queries of the Commission, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed the
following:
That it was his understanding that the construction project would last approximately
30 days, and that it was scheduled to begin approximately at the end of August.
That this was a unique situation in that the temporary on-street parking would only be
permitted for a specific period of time during the construction process;
That when this issue was previously addressed, the residents had b~en opposed to
the on-street parking at that time due to concerns regarding removing the bike lanes,
and the lack of visibility while exiting various residences if on-street parking were
permitted;
That while most of the on-street parking would occur in the evening, it would most
likely also occur during the day; and
That the width of the street was 44 feet.
Addressing the Public/Traffic Safety Commission together regarding the request for
temporary on-street parking, Mr. Craig Bailard and David Brennan, 41687 Temeku
Drive, relayed the following:
Clarified the rationale for the request, noting that the construction which would be
taking place at the Temeku Hills Clubhouse encompassed expanding the parking lot
in two phases, each of which would take approximately two weeks, ergo the request
for temporary on-street parking While parking stalls would temporarily not be
available for use during this construction period;
That during this construction period, additional parking would be needed on
approximately 20 of the 30 construction days based on the scheduled events;
That it would be their desire that parking be allowed on both sides of the street
during the construction period;
Reiterated the anticipated timing of the project (30 days), as well as relaying the
specific project plan (which encompassed removing the landscaped planters located
in the parking area to allow for additional room for additional parking stalls);
That the project was expected to begin in the middle of September;
That if the temporary on-street parking was not approved, vehicles would most likely
be parked in the two proximate cul-de-sacs;
That there was no proximate undeveloped parcel which could be utilized for
temporary parking; and
That the additional 26 permanent parking spaces added during the expansion would
be beneficial long term.
Commissioner Connerton noted that when this issue was addressed in 1999, it was
recommended that the developer be contacted and that a satellite parking system be
developed due to the inadequate parking facilities on site, specifically noting that it was
recommended that the parking area be set up on Royal Birkdale Drive which was Open
Space.
In response to Commissioner Connerton, Mr. Ballard and Mr. Brennan relayed that there
was no Open Space at this time.
Commissioner Connerton relayed his comments regarding the request for temporary on-
street parking, as follows:
That if thgre were parking permitted on both sides of the street it should be
staggered in order to allow enough space for cars to pull over for emergency
vehicles;
That an encroachment permit should be issued and that there be a designated
amount of time for the allowance of on-street parking; and
That if the temporary on-street parking causes significant negative impacts that it
then De disallowed.
Commissioner Katan relayed his comments regarding the requirement for temporary on-
street parking, as follows:
That he could support temporary on-street parking for a period of 30 days; and
That it might be prudent to require additional safety patrol officers be added to aid in
directing traffic during special events.
For Commissioner Katan, Mr. Ballard and Mr. Brennan relayed that when big'events
were scheduled it was mandatory that the group provided valet service; and advised, for
Commissioner Connerton, that the service could be directed regarding where and how
the cars were to be parked on the street.
Chairman Lanier, echoed by Commissioner Conner[on, commented that the
homeowners as well as the Homeowners Association in this area had inherited problems
from the developer.
Due to the potential for time overlap during the construction process, Chairman Lanier
recommended that the parking be permitted for more than a 30-day period.
Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that an encroachment permit could address the
details regarding the temporary permitted on-street parking (e.g., a requirement for a
traffic control plan which would include signage stating that bicycle lanes and golf lanes
were closed for a period of time), additionally advising that since this was a request for
temporary on-street parking it was his understanding that it would not need to go before
the City Council.
Fire Captain McBride advised that with a 44-foot street width (without a median) the Fire
Department standards allow parking on both sides of the street.
For clarification, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that on-street parking would not
continue to the area where the median is located.
MOTION: Commissioner Conner[on moved to approve on-street parking temporarily on
a portion Temeku Drive subject to staff preparing an encroachment permit, limiting the
parking to a 45-day period; that there be traffic control included, and that the on-street
permitted parking not continue into the portion of the street where the median was
located. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Commissioner Wedel who abstained and Commissioner
Coe who was absent.
3. Request for Pedestrian Crossin,q - Meadows Parkway
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider the installation of
pedestrian warning signs and flashing beacons on Meadows Parkway in
the vicinity of Via Reina and Corte Florecita.
Chairman Lanier advised that he would be abstaining from this item, ergo Vice Chairman
Connerton presided during the consideration of this issue.
Presenting the staff report (per agenda material), Senior Engineer Moghadam noted the
request staff received to consider various alternatives to improve the safety of
pedestrians that cross Meadows Parkway; relayed a detailed overview of staff's analysis
of the recommended options to address pedestrian crossing safety in this particular area
which included evaluating the following: the establishment of a school area prima facie
speed limit of 25 MPH on Meadows Parkway, installation of a marked crosswalk at an
uncontrolled location, installation of a mid-block pedestrian signal, installation of an all-
way stop, installation of a traffic signal, and installation of flashing beacon lights with a
marked crosswalk; and advised that after extensive analysis it was staff's
recommendation that flashing beacons be installed in the vicinity of the park with the
supplemental signs denoting pedestrian crossing, noting staff's hope that with this
installation motorists be provided an indication that there was pedestrian crossing
occurring in this vicinity.
Addressing the queries of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Senior Engineer
Moghadam ~'elayed the following information:
That staff was not aware of whether staff's recommendation was acceptable to the
HOA;
That the second step staff would consider if this recommendation does not provide
additional pedestrian safety would be the installation of an unwarranted stop sign at
one of the intersections (noting that this installation would only serve as a last
resort recommendation);
That staff has received no additional information regarding Caltrans accepting
flashing impeded LED crosswalks as a standard uniform traffic device;
That the pedestrian signage recommended for installation denoted pedestrians
crossing the street;
Acknowledged that some of the through traffic would utilize Butterfield Stage Road
when connected;
That while similar flashing beacons had been installed in school areas, this
installation would be the first implementation not in a school zone;
That crossing was occurring currently in this area; and that it was staff's desire to
expedite this recommendation, in order that, if feasible, the installation could be
implemented expeditiously since school was now in session.
For informational purposes, Vice Chairman Connerton relayed that at a recent traffic
engineer's seminar held in San Diego, an amber LED flashing light device was
presented as a recommended crosswalk.
Mr. Paul Jacobs, 32370 Corte Zamora, noted how impressed he was with City staff's
expediency and thoroughness in responding to his request regarding traffic control in the
Vintage Hills area; clarified the rationale for his request; noted his complete agreement
with staff's recommendation; noted that the analysis was completed while school was
not in session, relaying the differentials existing while school was in session; provided
the details of a recent accident which occurred in this area; urged the Public/Traffic
Safety Commission to approve staff's recommendation; requested the City to monitor
this area for speed enforcement and to conduct further review of the area as the area
continues to build out; additionally requested that if the flashing beacons were installed
that the lights be turned off between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M.; for
Commissioner Wedel, noted that he was representing himself, and not the HOA,
regarding this matter; for Commissioner Katan, relayed the areas where children were
picked up after school; and clarified that the HOA Clubhouse parking lot was not
designed to accommodate school pick-up and drop-off parking needs.
Commissioner Katan commended staff for their diligent work regarding this issue.
RAtraffi cm~n ut es'~ 82202 6
MOTION:' Commissioner Katan moved to approve staffs recommendation; and directed
staff to re-evaluate this area in a six-month period. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Wedel and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Coe who was absent and Chairman Lanier who abstained.
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the Rancho Vista Road Right Turn Overlap
Project has been completed which had been recommended by Commissioner
Connerton.
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
Apprising the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Police Sergeant Lohman relayed the
following:
Updated the Commission regarding Officer Pringle's (an Officer who had been
involved in an accident on July 24th while on duty and traveling on a motorcycle)
recovery;
That SLAP enforcement has increased;
Noted the process of adding two additional Motor Officers to staff;
That there would be an article in the Press Enterprise Newspaper regarding traffic
issues; and
That DUI enforcement was increased over the previous few weeks, which resulted
in some arrests.
FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT
Updating the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Fire Captain McBride noted the
following:
Relayed that new Fire Department staff has recently been added, recommending
that the issue of introducing the new Fire Department personnel be agendized for a
future Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting; and
Advised that it was noteworthy that the County Fire Department had utilized various
hand-held GPS units to obtain information regarding the residents' location as well
as the fire risks associated with a fire incident in the Juliann area..
COMMISSION REPORTS
For Commissioner Connerton, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that
Caltrans was currently conducting a project on the 1-15 Freeway which would last
approximately six weeks and take place from 7:00 P.M. to 5:00 A.M. and would
encompass lane closures as the project proceeded.
Commissioner Connerton noted that the congestion appears to take place prior to
the project hours, recommending that Caltrans monitor the number of vehicles
accessing the freeway during these peak hours.
Due to his appointment to Congressman Issa's Traffic Committee, Commissioner
Connerton requested input from staff regarding traffic issues in the City as well as
the County.
Commissioner C0nnerton, echoed by Chairman Lanier, commended the Police
Department regarding the increased citation enforcement; and for informational
purposes, noted that very few individuals were stopping at the intersection of Ranch
Vista Road/Meadows Parkway.
D. Chairman Lanier queried whether the City of Temecula was experiencing etching
impacts besides the typical graffiti, as the City of San Diego was experiencing.
E. Chairman Lanier noted that Saturday, August 24th would be Police Sergeant
Lohman's birthday.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:10 P.M. Chairman Lanier formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday~ September
26, 2002 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula.
Chairman Scott Lanier
Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle
ITEM NO. 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
~--~li Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer,
Traffic
September 26, 2002
Item 2
Multi-Way Stop Signs - North General Kearny Road at Golden Rod Road
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend:
1. That the present level of traffic control be maintained at the intersection of North General Kearny
Road and Golden Rod Road; and
2. ~hat the LED speed limit advisory signs be installed on North General Kearny Road just east and west
of Golden Rod Road in compliance with the City's policy.
BACKGROUND:
A petition was received from Mr. Steve Chavez, on behalf of the residents of Golden Rod Road and North
General Kearny Road, requesting the installation of Multi-Way Stop signs at the intersection of North General
Kearny Road and Golden Rod Road. A similar request was submitted to the County of Riverside for the
installation of Multi-Way Stop signs at the intersection of Golden Rod Road and Franciscan Court. An
evaluation of traffic conditions has been performed at the North General Kearny Road and Golden Rod Road
intersection to determine if minimum warrant criteria for the installation of Multi-Way Stop signs is satisfied.
The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this matter through
the agenda notification process and by letter.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has considered the issue of speeding on North General Keamy Road
numerous times in the past and numerous studies have been performed for the area. The use of multi-way stop
controls along North General Keamy Road has been evaluated at least five (5) times in the past five (5) years,
not including the latest evaluation. During those evaluation periods, Golden Rod Road did not connect to the
single-family residential developments located to the north in the County of Riverside.
In response to the residents' petition, the LED speed limit advisory sign was installed on Golden Rod Road just
east of North General Kearny Road on September 5, 2002, to raise the motorist's awareness of the posted
speed limit and adyise them of their speed. Pursuant to the sign's installation policy, the sign will remain on
Golden Rod Road for a period of up to thirty (30) days.
North General Kearny Road is a forty-four (44) foot wide residential street that functions as a collector street
providing direct access to Nicolas Road for numerous single-family dwelling units. The Average Daily Traffic
(ADT) on North General Kearny Road is approximately 2,200 west of Golden Rod Road. The speed limit is
posted at 25 MPH on North General Kearny Road.
Golden Rod Road between North General Kearny Road and the City limit is a forty-four (44) foot wide
residential street that functions as a collector street. There are approximately ten (10) single-family dwelling
units that front on Golden Rod Road. The speed limit is posted at 25 MPH on Golden Rod Road within the
City limits. There is a stop sign for southbound traffic on Golden Rod Road. Beyond the city limits, in the
County of Riverside, Golden Rod Road is a forty-four (44) foot wide residential collector street with no single-
family dwelling units fronting the street. In the County's segment, Golden Rod Road provides access to
Willows Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road for numerous single-family residential units. The County has
posted the speed limit at 40 MPH on this segment of Golden Rod Road.
In order to evaluate the need for multi-way stop signs, entering vehicular volume data was collected for a
seventy-two (72) hour period from September 3 through 5, 2002. This data was used to perform a multi-way
stop warrant analysis. The Caltrans Traffic Manual indicates that the multi-way stop signs maybe useful at
locations where the volume of traffic on intersecting roads is approximately equal and/or where a combinahon
of high speed, restricted sight distance and an accident history indicates that assignment of right-of-way is
necessary. Multi-Way Stop controls should not be used for controlling vehicular speed. There are three (3)
criteria that Caltrans has established for the evaluation of multi-way stop signs. These criteria are as follows:
Where signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that
can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal
installations.
An accident problem, as indicated by five (5) or more reported accidents within a twelve (12) month
period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include
right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum Traffic Volumes
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least
500 vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day, and
The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must
average at least 200 units per hour for the same eight (8) hours, with an average delay to
minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour,
but
When the 85~ percentile approach speed of the maj or street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour,
the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements.
The multi-way stop warrant analysis performed for the intersection indicates that the minimum traffic volume
warrant is not satisfied and multi-way stop signs are not warranted at the intersection.
Because the east leg of North General Kearny Road was closed when the original data was collected, a
subsequent evaluation was performed using revised data collected during a forty-eight (48) hour period from
September 11 through 13, 2002, after the opening of the east leg of North General Kearny Road. The
subsequent analysis indicates that the minimum traffic volume warrant is not satisfied and multi-way stop
signs are not warranted at the intersection. Our evaluation under both scenarios did not reveal any unusual
cimumstances or conditions that would suggest that the intersection requires special consideration for the use
of multi-way stop signs. Copies of both analyses are included as Exhibit "B".
The vehicular volume data collected on September 11, through 13, 2002, indicates that following the opening
of the east leg of North General Kearny Road there was a thirty-seven (37) percent reduction in vehicular
volumes on Golden Rod Road and a similar percentage increase in vehicular volumes on the east leg of North
2
General Kearny Road. This confimas the residents' observations that Golden Rod Road was being used as the
primary access to Nicolas Valley elementary School during the road construction closure.
In addition to the multi-way stop warrant anaylsis, an evaluation of vehicular speeds was performed on North
General Kearny Road and Golden Rod Road on September 10, 2002, after the opening of the road closure.
The spot speed analysis indicates that the 85t~ percentile speed on North General Kearny Road and Golden Rod
Road within the City limits is approximately 30 MPH. The 85~ percentile speeds observed oh North General
Kearny Road are consistent with those observed in 1999. Copies of the spot speed analysis are included as
Exhibit "C".
The residents also expressed concerns regarding the lack of adequate sight distance at the intersection due to
obstructions (parked vehicles, utility boxes and vegetation) and the execution of improper tums by eastbound
to northbound left-mm vehicles which effectively encroach into oncoming traffic traveling southbound on
Golden Rod Road.
An evaluation of the sight distance was performed and it was determined that if vehicles stop at the limit line
(approximately 10 feet behind the extension of the curb line) on Golden Rod Road, the visibility of
approaching westbound North General Kearny Road traffic is limited when a vehicle is parked at the northeast
comer of the intersection. However, the line of sight does improve when a vehicle pulls out beyond the limit
line to a point where parked vehicles do not restrict their line of sight. Using an approach speed of 25 MPH,
the minimum stopping sight distance required at this location is approximately one hundred eighty-five (185)
feet. Our evaluation indicates that the stopping sight distance is becomes less restricted when a vehicle edges
out beyond the limit line. The reslriction of on street parking to improve the minimum sight distance will
effectively remove the only available on street parking in front of the two single family residences located on
the northeast comer of North General Kearny Road and Golden Rod Road. The sight distance looking west
was unobstructed. Considering that the 85a~ percentile speeds along North General Kearny Road are relatively
low and the fact that there have been no reported traffic collisions at this intersection in the past twenty-four
(24) months, it is staff' s opinion that the current sight distance is adequate for conditions and the restriction of
parking is not necessary at this time.
For these reasons, staff recommends that the present level of traffic control be maintained at the intersection of
North General Kearny Road and Golden Rod Road. Staff also recommends the installation of the LED speed
limit advisory sign on North General Kearny Road just east and west of Golden Rod Road to raise the
motorists' awareness of the posted speed limit and advise them of their speed.
In addition to the recommended action, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission could consider other alternatives
such as: the installation ofcenterline striping on North General Kearny Road and Golden Rod Road to produce
a narrowing effect and guide vehicles at the intersection; the installation of a supplemental fine sign located
below the existing speed limit sign on Golden Rod Road; and request that the Police Department provide
additional enforcement on North General Kearny Road and Golden Rod Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Routine Street Maintenance Account.
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A"- Location Map
2. Exhibit "B" - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis
3. Exhibit "C' - Spot Speed Analysis
4. Exhibit "D' - Sight Distance Visibility Analysis
5. Exhibit "E' - Letter and Petition from Steve Chavez received August 23, 2002
3
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT "B"
MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT ANALYSIS
Multi-Way Stop Warranting Software
09/09/02
Major Street:
Minor Street:
Date of Analysis:
Name of Analyst:
Case Number:
Comments: With Road Closure
85th% Speed of Major Street: 25
North General Kearny Road
Golden Rod Road
09/09/02
WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
WARR3ZNT 1 - Accident Experience
NOT SATISFIED - The accident warrant of 5 or more reportable accidents
of a correctable type is not met with 0 accidents over a 12 month period.
WARPJtNT 2 - Minimum Traffic Volumes
NOT SATISFIED - The 100% vehicular warrant of 500 entering vehicles
any 8 hours of the day is not met with 0 hours meeting the warrant.
for
WARRANT 3 - Vehicular & Pedestrian Traffic from Minor Road
NOT SATISFIED - The combined total of 200 vehicles and pedestrians
from the minor approach is not met with 0 hours meeting the warrant.
Multi-Way Stop Warranting Software
09/09/02
START
TIME
NB SB EB
100% 70%
WB HOUR WARRANT WARRANT
TOT MET MET
COMBINATION
WARRANT
MET
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
0 3 3 2 8
0 6 3 1 10
0 0 1 1 2
0 3 1 0 4
0 10 3 4 17
0 13 9 9 31
0 52 11 15 78
0 99 40 31 170
0 123 65 27 215
0 10i 116 33 250
0 67 31 30 128
0 60 37 44 141
0 76 76 41 193
0 67 57 23 147
0 75 35 18 128
0 197 138 35 370
0 70 80 36 186
0 86 64 30 180
0 76 73 18 167
0 42 69 21 132
0 32 52 8 92
0 15 36 10 61
0 6 19 6 31
0 4 9 2 15
Multi-Way Stop Warranting Software
09/16/02
Major Street:
Minor Street:
Date of Analysis:
Name of Analyst:
Case Number:
Comments: W/O Road Closure
85th% Speed of Major Street:
North General Kearny Road
Golden Rod Road
/ /
25
WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
WARR3LNT 1 - Accident Experience
NOT SATISFIED - The accident warrant of 5 or more reportable accidents
of a correctable type is not met with 0 accidents over a 12 month period.
WARRANT 2 - Minimum Traffic Volumes
NOT SATISFIED - The 100% vehicular warrant of 500 entering vehicles for
any 8 hours of the day is not met with 0 hours meeting the warrant.
WARRANT 3 - Vehicular & Pedestrian Traffic from Minor Road
NOT SATISFIED - The combined total of 200 vehicles and pedestrians
from the minor approach is not met with 0 hours meeting the warrant.
Multi-Way Stop Warranting Software
09/16/02
START
TIME
NB SB EB
100% 70%
WB HOUR WARRANT WARRANT
TOT MET MET
COMBINATION
WARRANT
MET
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
0 6 5 0 11
0 1 1 0 2
0 3 0 0 3
0 3 1 2 6
0 6 3 10 19
0 13 4 11 28
0 33 17 31 81
0 113 66 65 244
0 7t 104 72 247
0 32' 80 42 154
0 20 32 15 67
0 30 51 39 120
0 24 83 56 163
0 27 47 9 83
0 46 44 28 118
0 137 1 75 213
0 39 72 34 145
0 44 89 24 157
0 38 182 27 247
0 53 68 123 244
0 30 40 53 123
0 15 44 4 63
0 4 15 0 19
0 5 5 1 11
EXHIBIT "C"
SPOT SPEED ANALYSIS
SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTP~ANS
Golden Rod Road: North General Kearny Rd. & County Line
ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY
1o Vehicular Speed Data Observed
Date and Time: September 10, 2002 at 11:57
Posted Speed Limit at Time of Study: 25 MPH
85th Percentile Speed: 30 MPH
10 MPH Pace: 20 through 29 MPH
Average Speed: 25.9
Subsequent to this study no change in the speed limit was made.
2 o
Accident Data
Street Classification: none specified
Accident Information for This Location:
Accident Information for Streets of Same Classification:
3. Unusual Conditions at This Location
Investigator: TC Date: 9/10/2002
SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS
Golden Rod Road: North General Kearny Rd. & County Line
DIRECTION(S) ....... NB & SB
DATE ............... 9/10/2002
TIME ............... 11:57
POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH
CUM
MPH NO. PCT. PCT.
0 0 0.0 0.0
1 0 0.0 0.0
2 0 0.0 0.0
3 0 0.0 0.0
4 0 0.0 0.0
5 0 0.0 0.0
6 0 0.0 0.O
7 0 0.0 0.0
8 0 0.0 0.0
9 0 0.0 0.0
10 0 0.0 0.0
11 0 0.0 0.0
12 0 0.0 0.0
13 0 0.0 0.0
14 0 0.0 0.0
15 0 0.0 0.0
16 0 0.0 0.0
17 0 0.0 0.0
18 0 0.0 0.0
19 0 0.0 0.0
20 1 3.4 3.4
21 1 3.4 6.9
22 2 6.9 13.8
23 5 17.2 31.0
24 1 3.4 34.5
25 5 17.2 51.7
26 3 10.3 62.1
27 4 1'3.8 75.9
28 1 3.4 79.3
29 1 3.4 82.8
30 1 3.4 86.2
31 1 3.4 89.7
32 2 6.9 96.6
33 1 3.4 100.0
34 0 0.0 100.0
35 0 0.0 100.0
36 0 0.0 100.0
37 0 0.0 100 0
38 0 0.0 100 0
39 0 0.0 100 0
40 0 0.0 100 0
41 0 0 0 100 0
42 0 0 0 100 0
43 0 0 0 100 0
44 0 0 0 100 0
45 0 0 0 100 0
46 0 0 0 100 0
>46 0 0 0 100 0
50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 25
85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 30
10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 20 through 29
PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 82.8
PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............ 17.2
PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ........... 0.0
RANGE OF SPEEDS ................. 20 to 33
VEHICLES OBSERVED ..................... 29
AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 25.9
CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH)
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
100
90
80
7O
60
5O
* 90
* 80
70
6O
50
40 40
30 * 30
20 20
*
10 10
0 10 20 3O 4O
PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH)
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
15
10
15
10
5
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + ....
0 10 20 30 40
SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS
North General Kearny Road: County Line to Cross Creek Court
ADMINISTP~ATIVE SUMMARY
1. Vehicular Speed Data Observed
Date and Time: September 10, 2002 at 9:49
Posted Speed Limit at Time of Study: 25 MPH
85th Percentile Speed: 30 MPH
10 MPH Pace: 22 through 31 MPM
Average Speed: 26.3
Subsequent to this study no change in the speed limit was made.
Accident Data'
Street Classification: none specified
Accident Information for This Location:
Accident Information for Streets of Same Classification:
3. Unusual Conditions at This Location
...................................
Investigator: tc Date: 9/10/2002
SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS
North General Kearny Road: County Line to Cross Creek Court
DIRECTION(S) ....... EB & WB
DATE ............... 9/10/2002
TIME ............... 9:49
POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH
CUM
MPH NO. PCT. PCT.
0 0 0.0 0.0
1 0 0.0 0.0
2 0 0.0 0.0
3 0 0.0 0.0
4 0 0.0 0.0
5 0 0.0 0.0
6 0 0.0 0.0
7 0 0.0 0o0
8 0 0.0 0.0
9 0 0.0 0.0
10 0 0.0 0.0
11 0 0.0 0.0
12 0 0.0 0.0
13 0 0.0 0.0
14 0 0.0 0.0
15 0 0.0 0.0
16 0 0.0 0.0
17 0 0.0 0.0
18 0 0.0 0.0
19 0 0.0 0.0
20 10 6.1 6.1
21 2 1.2 7.3
22 11 6.7 14.0
23 10 6.1 20.1
24 17 10.4 30.5
25 18 11.0 41.5
26 19 11.6 53.0
27 22 13.4 66.5
28 14 8.5 75.0
29 12 7.3 82.3
30 7 4.3 86.6
31 8 4.9 91.5
32 4 2.4 93.9
33 5 3.0 97.0
34 5 3 . 0 100.0
35 0 0.0 100.0
36 0 0.0 100.0
37 0 0.0 100.0
38 0 0.0 100.0
39 0 0.0 100.0
40 0 0.0 100.0
41 0 0.0 100.0
42 0 0.0 100.0
43 0 0.0 100.0
44 0 0.0 100.0
45 0 0.0 100.0
46 0 0.0 100.0
>46 0 0.0 100.0
50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 26
85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 30
10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 22 through 31
PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84.1
PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............ 8.5
PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ........... 7.3
PJLNGE OF SPEEDS ................. 20 to 34
VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 164
AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 26.3
100
90
8O
70
6O
5O
40 *
30 *
20 *
10
15
CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH)
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + ....
************'10
* 90
* 80
70
60
50
4O
3O
20
10
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
0 10 20 30 4O
PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH)
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +
15
+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... +___'_+ .... + .... + .... +
0 10 20 30 40
10
EXHIBIT "D"
SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS
EXHIBIT "E"
LETTER AND PETITION FROM STEVE CHAVEZ
DATED AUGUST 23, 2002
micke~mouse~cts.com
· 39810 Colt[ch Rod Road, Te~n¢cuh. CA 92591
(909)506-0506
August 19, 2002
RECEIVED
/ UG 3 200Z
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
City Hall, Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California
92589-9033
Attention: Ali Moghadam, City Of Temecula, Traffic Engineer
Dear Ali:
Let me start by saying that I appreciate your work on our behalf. To date I feel that you
have been a good representative for the people of our community in the pursuit of your
key objectives of improving the overall traffic flow within our city. That said, let me
address a serious problem of which you may or may not be familiar. I will be direct, as it
is a situation that will get more serious as time passes.
As you might know, North General Kearny Road serves as a major thoroughfare for our
local community as well as being an efficient access road for Nicolas Valley Elementary
School and Four Seasons, the adjacent fifty-five and older community. Hundreds of
motorists use this road every day. This includes a fair share of pedestrian and bicycle
traffic as well.
Unfortunately, there are currently no safe areas to cross North General Kearny Road
except for its intersection at Nicolas Road. Upon reaching the intersection at Golden Rod
Road, children and adults are forced to take their chances as they attempt to cross the
road wherever they can find a break in the traffic. This can be very hazardous, especially
in the mornings and evenings when people are leaving or returning fi:om work. It gets
downright dangerous at night when people take evening walks. Given the amount of
children, adults and senior citizens living in the area and using these sidewalks, this has
created a situation where a death by car strike is merely a matter of time.
Due to power utility boxes, trees, parked cars and other visibility hazards, the comer of
Golden Rod Road and North General Kearny Road is often transformed into a blind
comer. Eastbound motorists turn left on to Golden Rod Road often cutting the comer and
steering into oncoming traffic. I have personally witnessed several near head on
collisions and even more similar incidenis involving bicyclists.
In just the ten houses facing Golden Rod Road, there are nine children under 10 years old
including my own five-year-old daughter, Susie. There are scores more on North
General Kearny Road and the adjoining neighborhoods.
Please bear in mind that Golden Rod Road is a hill. I don't need to remind you that balls
and rolling toys being played with in front yards regularly find their way into the street.
Also due to the hill, this is a favorite spot for scooter riders, skateboarders and bicyclists
to coast down the street. As I said earlier, it is only a matter of time until someone dies
due to these conditions. In ail likelihood, that death will be a child. If this happens, that
death will be a direct result of the City of Temecula's failure to act unless proper safety
measures are installed.
Recently, developers received permission to close the eastern end of North General
Kearny Road for a period of months, rerouting all traffic to and from the school and
surrounding homes, through Golden Rod Road. This was scheduled so as to take
advantage of the summer break. However, construction has proceeded slowly and it
seems that it will continue well into the new school year. This means even more cars will
be using Golden Rod Road and, even more important, more children will have to dodge
this increased traffic in order to either get to school or home. Chances are that even after
the road is opened again, people will have created a habit 0f using Golden Rod as their
main access to the school so traffic will probably not decrease significantly.
As a parent and concerned resident of Golden Rod Road, I speak for the community
when I respectfully inslst that a three way stop be installed at the intersection of Golden
Rod Road and North General Keamy Road. A stop sign will enable motorists to stop and
safely assess the situation before turning.
A petition to this end is being circulated throughout the entire community. I have included a
copy of the petition in its current state.
This problem continues at the risk of our residents, especially our children. Please feel
free to call me at your convenience should you have any questions. I invite you to meet
with me here at my home so that you can witness the situation we are exposed to on a
daily basis. I cordially await your response.
Respectfully,
STOP SIGN PETITION
To: County of Riverside Transportation Dept, Traffic Engineering section
PO Box 1090, Riverside, CA 92502-1090
submitted by: Residents/Citizens of the Golden Rod Rd. Area.
Primary point of contact: Steve Chavez 39810 Golden Rod. Rd.
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS/MANAGERS/TENANTS hereby request a three Way
stop be installed at the intersection of Golden Rod Rd. and Franciscan Ct.
NOTE: Only the property owner, manager or tenant may sign. In cases of multiple tenants, the owner or
manager may sign for the entire property. In cases of cOIte6tive ownership, a representative of the
homeowners association may sign..
PROPERTY ADDRESS PR/NT NAME
303 ?~' ~O/ql.t~'t47-'cr: g~ II~'L~
MAILING ADDRESS
To:
STOP SIGN PETITION
County of Riverside Transportation Dept, Traffic Engineering Section
PO Box .1090, Riverside, CA 92502-1090
Sub~tted by: Residents/Citizens of the Golden Rod Rd. Area.
Primary point of contact: Steve Chavez 39810 Golden Rod. Rd.
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS/MANAGERS/TENANTS hereby request a three way
stop'be installed at the intersection of Golden Rod Rd. and Franciscan Ct.
NOTE: Only the property owner, manager or tenant may sign. In cases of multiple tenants, the owner or
manager may sign for the entire property. In cases of collective ownership, a representative of the
homeowners association ~may sign.
PROPERTY ADDRESS PRINT NAME
MAILING ADDRESS
57 ~e
STOP SIGN PETITION
To: Ali Moghadam, City Of Temecula, Traffic Engineer PO Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Submitted by: Residents/Citizens of the Golden Rod Rd. Area.
Primary point of contact: Steve Chavez 39810 Golden Rod. Rd.
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS/MANAGERS/TENANTS hereby request a three way
stop be installed at the intersection of Golden Rod Rd. and N. Ge0. Kearny Rd.
NOTE: Only the property owner, manager or tenant may sign. In cases of multiple tenants, the owner or
manager may sign for the entire property. In cases of collective ownership, a representative of the
homeowners association may sign.
PROPI~RT~ ADDRESS PRINT NAME
- ' ~
IGNATURE
MAILING ADDRESS
3
STOP SIGN PETITION
To: Ali Moghadam, City Of Temecula, Traffic Engineer PO Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Submitted by: Residents/Citizens of the Golden Rod Rd. Area.
Primary point of contact: Steve Chavez 39810.Golden Rod. Rd;
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY oWNERS/MANAGERSfrENANTS hereby request a three way
stop be installed at the intersection of Golden Rod Rd. and N. Gen. Kearny Rd.
NOTE: Only the property owner, manager or tenant may sign. In cases of multiple tenants, the owner or
manager may sign for the entire property. In cases of collective ownership, a representative of the
homeowners association. may sign.
PROPERTY ADDRESS PRINT 'NAME
~ct-zT~ ~ot~ ~od ~0. t~,4 I~)hi
0 375 ~ov~ct~r ~ '~RM
~ ~o~l,k~ ""
F/q Lt, g"J-b
MAILING ADDRESS
STOP SIGN PETITION
:o: Ali Moghadam, City Of Temecula, Traffic.F~at~er/~ PO Bo~.9033, Temecnla, CA 92589-9033
Submitted by: R~idents/C. itizens of the~nlden Ro/~ Rd. Area.
Primary point of con~to~c_~. Steve Chavgz 39810 Golden Rod. Rd~
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERT~'~S/ 4~~rENANTS hereby request a three
stop be installed at the intersection of GoMe~~ anON. Gen. Kearny Rd.
NOTE: Only the property owner, manager or tenant t
· manager may sign for the entire property. In/
homeowners association may sign,
way
ay sign. In cases of multiple tenants, the owner or
eases of collective ownership, a representative of the
PROPERTY ADDRESS
PRINT 'NAME
!
_0~[
ITEM NO. 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 26, 2002
Item 3
Pedestrian Bridge over Winchester Road 'at Nicolas Road
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review the feasibility study for a pedesthan bridge over Winchester
Road at Nicolas Road, and make recommendations to the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
At the July 10, 2001 meeting, the City Council directed the Public Works Department to process an application
for the construction of a pedestrian bridge over Winchester Road at Nicolas Road. To initiate this process,
staff met with Caltrans officials on August 21,2001 to investigate the feasibility of constructing the pedestrian
bridge. At Caltrans' request, a City letter dated September 11,2001, formally requested the initiation of the
pedestrian bridge project.
In response to the City's request to initiate the process of constructing the pedestrian overerossing, Caltrans
issued a letter dated November 15, 2001. In the letter, Caltrans stated that they could not support the
construction of this facility. Caltrans cited the presence of a traffic signal with a pedestrian crosswalk at the
location of the proposed bridge as the primary reason for not supporting the construction of the overerossing.
The major criterion the proposed bridge does not meet is quoted below from Caltrans' letter:
"The locatioh must be on the "Suggested Route to School" at an uncontrolled intersection or mid-block
location along an expressway or major arterial street where the width, traffic speed and volume make it
undesirable for pedestrians to cross. There is an existing traffic signal with a pedestrian crosswalk at the
intersection of State Route 79 and Nicolas Road, which is immediately adjacent to the high school. This
provides a "controlled" environment for pedestrians to cross Winchester Road safely."
In order to insure that all available options and all aspects of the proposed overcrossing were explored, the City
retained the consulting firm of Imbsen & Associates, Inc. to conduct a feasibility study. The study identified
four (4) alternatives as described below.
Alternative No. 1 - "No Build":
This alternative proposes no change to the existing conditions since the existing controlled intersection
provides adequate and safe pedestrian crossing on Winchester Road at Nicolas Road. There will be no costs
associated with this alternative.
R:\traffic\COM M ISSIOI-gAG ENDAX2002\092602XPrestrian Bridge.doc
Alternative No. 2 - "Grade Separation":
This option includes either Winchester Road going over Nicolas Road or Winchester Road going under
Nicolas Road. This alternative will require a long transition to get back to the existing grade and will eliminate
direct access to the businesses along Winchester Road and the RTA bus stop, which is used by the students.
This alternative will also require several underground utility relocations, additional right-of-way and severely
impact the adjacent developments including the Chaparral High School. This alternative would be the most
costly alternative at approximately $3 million.
Alternate No. 3 - "Pedestrian Overcrossing":
This alternative will require a very long ramp in order to provide the minimum vertical clearance required by
Caltrans. This alternative will also require additional right-of-way and relocation of existing high voltage
power lines and other utilities. The overcrossing would also restrict the visibility of the existing traffic signal,
therefore, creating a potential unsafe condition at the intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. The
cost for this alternative is estimated at $2 million.
The most important factor in considering this alternative is the utilization of the overcrossing by students.
Students, most likely, will choose to use the existing "at grade" intersection rather than using the long ramps or
the stairs. Due to the existing conditions such as driveways, bus stops and utility company facilities,
installation of a barrier or a fence to channel the students to the overcrossing would not be feasible.
Alternative No. 4 - "Pedestrian Undercrossing" (Tunnel):
This altemative will pose similar challenges as Alternative No. 3. In addition, an undercrossing will require
addressing other issues such as ground water and security of the hidden-from-view areas. The cost for this
alternative is estimated at $1.5 million.
Summary and Conclusions:
'As stated in this report and the feasibility study, alt available altematives will impact the surrounding areas,
will cause inconvenience and congestion during the lengthy construction phase, and will be costly. Also, the
use of an overcrossing by students, and therefore, its effectiveness cannot be guaranteed. In addition, if an
overcrossing is constructed at this location, the existing pedestrian crosswalks and signals will have to be
removed. The removal of pedestrian crossing at the signalized intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas
Road will result in students crossing Winchester Road without the signal protection, which could compromise
their safety.
FISCAL 1MPACT:
At the July 10, 2001 meeting, the City Council approved a transfer of $400,000.00 in Capital Reserves from
the Murrieta Hot Springs Road Flyover Project (Date/Cherry Street Improvements from Mumeta Hot Springs
Road to Margarita Road-Phase V) to the pedestrian bridge project over State Route 79 North/Winchester Road
at Nicolas Road.
ATTACHMENT:
Exhibit "A" - Caltrans' letter, dated November 15, 2001
Exhibit "B" - Imbsen & Associates Report Summary.
Complete report is available for review in the Public Works Department
Office of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
2
R:\traffic\COM MIS SION~AG END AX2002\092602~Prest~an Bridge.doe
Exhibit "A"
Caltrans' letter, dated November 15, 2001
STATE OF CALIFORNIA--BUSINESS. TRA~NSt )AT/ON AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8 (MS-716)
464 WEST FOURTH STREET, 6TM FLOOR
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400
PHONE (909} 383-4226
FAX (909) 383-6445
November 15,2001
08-Riv-79-PM R3.980
GRAy DAVIS, Governor
Flex your power!
Be energy~effident!
RECEIVED
NOV i 9 2001
C,T Or TmECUL^
Mr. William G. Hughes
Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Mr. Hughes:
This is in response to your letter regarding construction of a pedestrian bridge on State Route
79(N) at Nicolas Road in the City of Temecula.
To be considered, a pedestrian bridge (over crossing) needs to comply with all of the following
criteria:
1. Meets the American with Disabilities Act (ADA); and
The prevailing conditions that required a school pedestrian crossing must be
sufficiently permanent to justify the separation crossing structure; and
The location must be on the "Suggested Route to School" at an uncontrolled
intersection or mid-block location along an expressway or major arterial street where
the width, traffic speed and volume make it undesirable for pedestrians to cross; and
Revision of the "Suggested Route to School" or the attendance boundaries to eliminate
the conflict is infeasible; and
Physical conditions make a separation crossing structure feasible from an engineering
standpoint, including pedestrian channelization to ensure usage of the structure; and
Adjacent controlled school pedestrian crossings are more than 600 feet from the
proposed structure and would require total out-of-direction walking distance of at least
1200 feet; and
Bus transportation, traffic signals, adult crossing guard or other means of resolving the
school pedestrian-vehicular conflicts are impractical; and
Mr. William G. Hughes
November 15,2001
Page 2
8. Meet State standard vertical clearance for tuck traffic; and
9. Meet the 7 1/2 second comer sight distance.
There is an existing traffic signal with a pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of State Route 79
and Nicholas Road, which is immediately adjacent to the high school. This provides a
"controlled" environment for pedestrians to cross safely. Furthermore, all facilities of this nature
should be available for all pedestrians to use at any time, not just school students. This will
require right of way to provide public access to the facility. Therefore, the Department cannot
support the construction of this facility.
If you have any questions or comments, please call me at (909) 383- 4226 or Mr. Ed Farnaghi of
my staff at (909) 383-6442.
Very truly yours,
JOHN PAGANO
Office Chief, Traffic Operations
Surveillance Region A
"Caltrans improves mobility across California"
Exhibit "B"
Imbsen & Associates Report Summary
IMBSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering Consultants
A TR ' Company
Executive Summary
To:
From:
Subject:
Amer Attar
Senior Engineer
City of Temecula
Jack L. Abcarius.
Project Manager
Date: June 14, 2002
Imbsen Project #: L1267
Feasibility Study for a Pedestrian Crossing at Winchester
Road and Nicolas Road
Winchester Road (SR 79 North) is a major expressway within the City of Te-
mecula. At the present time the intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas
Road is a standard signalized at grade intersection with crosswalks. The
City of Temecula retained Imbsen & Associates to investigate the feasibility
of a pedestrian crossing at Winchester Road near Nicolas Road.
Through information such as parcel maps, traffic counts, preliminary designs
and estimates and aerial mapping we have investigated three different alter-
natives; Alternative 1 - Grade Separation, Alternative 2 - Pedestrian Over-
crossing and Alternative 3 - Pedestrian Tunnel.
Winchester Road is a State Route, and therefore falls under the jurisdiction
of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Therefore, in or-
der for us to complete this Feasibility Report, we investigated Caltrans' poli-
cies with regards to constructing a pedestrian crossing over their facility.
This report summarizes our findings and attempts to clearly identify the im-
pacts associated with each, in order to help the City determine the next
course of action.
INTRODUCTION:
Winchester Road is a major expressway within thc City of Temecula serving
traffic in the north/south direction. It is also known as the SR-79 North
Transportation Corridor, and is maintained by the State Department of
Transportation. Nicolas Road is a local City street crossing Winchester Road
between Roripaugh Road to the south and Rustic Glen Drive to the north. The
intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road is currently a standard
signalized at grade intersection with sidewalks. Winchester Road has a total of
eight (8) lanes, three (3) through lanes in each direction with one (1) northbound
left mm and one (1) northbound right turn lane onto Nicolas Road.
Pedestrian traffic is mainly comprised of students attending Chaparral High
School located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection (see Vicinity Map,
Figure 1). The major circulation pattern is in the morning from the east on
Nicolas Road along the southern sidewalk, crossing Winchester Road to reach the
school (pattern is reversed in the afternoon).
Based upon meetings with City staff, we understand that the City needs to explore
the feasibility of constructing a facility across Winchester Road just south of
Nicolas Road, to promote a safer and uninterrupted crossing for students to and
from Chaparral High School. We have investigated three different alternatives;
Alternative 1 - A Grade Separation between Nicolas Road and Winchester Road,
Alternative 2 - A Pedestrian Overcrossing structure, and Alternative 3 - A
Pedestrian Undercrossing structure.
I
I
I
I
I
I
IMBSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering Consultants
A '~ Company
i
il
ii
ii
II
ii
ii
Ii
Ii
II
II
II
II
I[
I
I
I
I
LOCATION MAP
VICINITY MAP ~
Figure 1: Location and Vicinity Maps
/~ f~ ~ IMBSEN ,~ ~SSOC~r~S, ~NC.
({1~ ~A~ ~I ~ ) En~needng Consultants
2 ~ A ~ Company
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Ill
II
II
II
II
II
ii
II
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Chaparral High School:
Chaparral High School lies in the southwest quadrant of the Winchester
Road/Nicolas Road intersection. It has approximately 2100 students. The
regular school hours are from 7:30 AM to 2:30 PM (see Chaparral High
School bell schedule in Appendix E).
Senior
Apartments:
In the Northwest quadrant of the Winchester Road/Nicolas Road
intersection lays "The Fountains" (luxury senior apartments). ''The
Fountains" is a three level Apartment Building located at 27250 Nicolas
Road. There are 244 units in this gated community.
Northeast Quadrant:
At the present time the Northeast quadrant is vacant, however there seems
to be future plans to construct a small shopping mall.
Southeast Quadrant:
In the Southeast quadrant there is an AM/PM gas station and market. Just
south of the AM/PM is a Jack-in-the Box. Farther south is a small
shopping mall and south of the shopping mall is a dentist office (see
Aerial map in Appendix A).
Pedestrian Traffic:
A traffic count was made on May 31, 2001. The majority of the
pedestrian traffic crosses Winchester Road on the south side of the
intersection. Before and after school there are approximately 200
crossings (see Pedestrian Traffic Counts in Appendix C).
Utilities:
Currently there is an existing 20" CML water line under the sidewalk on
the west side of Winchester Road and a 15" VCP sewer line under the
Winchester Road Roadway. There is a 4" Fire Hydrant behind the East
sidewalk along Winchester Road approximately 300' south of Nicolas
Road. There are also overhead high voltage lines above the east sidewalk
along Winchester Road with several power poles located in the grassy area
east of the sidewalk.
IMBSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering Consultants
A ~ Company ~
i
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
ii
ii
ii
ii
II
ALTERNATIVE 1 (Grade Separation):
Altemative #1 consists of placing a grade separation at the intersection of
Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. This would entail the construction of a
bridge (Overcrossing) to allow Nicolas Road to go over Winchester Road or have
Winchester Road go over Nicolas Road (Undercrossing). In both the
Overcrossing and the Undercrossing the sidewalks would be extended adjacent to
the roadways.
The overcrossing would make access to "The Fountains" and the high school
difficult from Nicolas Road. Assuming 6 % slope the distance it would take for
the road elevation to come back down from the bridge elevation would be
approximately 350 feet.
The Undercrossing would limit access to all the businesses located in the
Southeast quadrant because of the rise in profile grade to clear Nicolas Road,
which would also impact access to Nicolas Road. It would also require the bus
stop along Winchester Road to move farther away from either the high school or
the senior apartments.
If access to both roads is to be maintained then both the overcrossing and
undercrossing structures would require additional Right-of-Way to be purchased.
This would be done through the use of on and off ramps like a diamond
interchange. Consequently, the businesses along Winchester Road on the east
side, the parking area for the High School on the west side, and the senior
apartments would be severely impacted, and potentially have to be relocated.
The City may consider constructing an ovemrossing structure without access to
the other roadway. This option of course would require a large amount of
retaining walls on all corners of the intersection except the northeast quadrant as
this lot is currently vacant. This option would also create a significant visual
impact to the local residents of "The Fountains".
Because this is a heavily traveled intersection, stage construction would be
required in order to accommodate traffic without interruption. Stage construction
increases the construction costs by about 25% and the construction time by about
75%. Stage construction also frustrates drivers attempting to get to work or home
on time.
Assuming approximately $150/sf for the bridge, the necessity for retaining walls
and fill, this alternative would cost in the range of $3,000,000. Because of the
reasons mentioned above this alternative was not deemed feasible, therefore an
Advanced Planning Study was not prepared.
IMBSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering Consultants
A ~ Company
II
II
II
ALTERNATIVE 2 (Pedestrian Overcrossing):
Alternative #2 consists of placing a pedestrian overcrossing (POC) over
Winchester Road, which would allow students (and other pedestrians) to cross
Winchester Road while being separated from vehicular traffic. Advanced
Planning Studies were prepared for POC's at two separate locations, Alternatives
#2A and #2B (See Advanced Planning Studies in Appendix B).
The California Department of Transportation Highway Design Manual was used
to determine the structures height and width. Section 208.6 "Pedestrian
Overcrossings and Undercrossings" states "The minimum width of walkway for
pedestrian overcrossings shall be 2.4 m (7'-10")". This section also states "The
ramp should have a maximum longitudinal slope of 8.33%", which was used to
determine the lengths of the ramps. Section 309.2 "Vertical Clearance" refers to
5.1m (16'-9") as the minimum required vertical clearance over Freeways and
Expressways. This section also requires pedestrian overcrossings to have 0.5 m
(1'-7 1/2") of extra vertical clearance. Therefore, the Advanced Planning Studies
were prepared with 18'-4" (5.6 m) vertical clearance over Winchester Road.
For both POC alternatives additional Right of Way would need to be pumhased,
but to a much lesser extent than Alternative 1. At the present time the roadway
Right of Way extends 6' behind the existing sidewalk. Since the proposed Bridge
and ramp is 10'-2" wide an additional 4'-2" piece of property would need to be
purchased on both sides of SR 79 North. The additional cost for Right-of-Way
acquisition was not included in the cost estimates prepared within this report.
The existing overhead high voltage wires located above the sidewalk along the
East side of SR~79 No~th will need to be relocated for both POC alternatives.
This task would require early coordination with the utility agency. These lines
would either have to be re-directed away from the project site, or placed
underground. The cost to the City, if any at all, has not been included in this
Feasibility Study.:
For both POC alternatives the crosswalks at the intersection crossing Winchester
Road will need to be removed and signs placed instructing pedestrians to use the
structure.
Alternative #2A:
The location of this POC would be approximately 450 feet south of the
intersection with Nicolas Road (see Arial Map in Appendix A). This
alternative is an eight span reinforced concrete structure of approximately
475' in length. The total length including the ramps would be
approximately 815'. It utilizes two spans to cross over Winchester Road.
5
IMBSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering Consultants
A ~ Company
ii
III
/I
/I
ii
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
ii
ii
ii
/I
/I
II
The column would be placed in the 7' wide median (see Advanced
Planning Study 2A in Appendix B).
The additional Right of Way for this alternative, on the east side of
Winchester Road, is currently a landscaped grass area. The area on the
west side of the highway is an empty area next to a drainage ditch (See
Photographs in Appendix F).
The probable construction cost for this alternative was estimated at
$968,000 in 2002 dollars.
Advantages:
· Placing a support bent in the median of SR-79 North allowed us to use
a superstructure depth of only 3'-9" which required shorter ramps
thereby reducing the extra distance pedestrians need to walk.
· The shorter ramps also reduced the overall cost.
Disadvantages:
· The close proximity of the bridge to the intersection along with the
northbound traffic going downhill at a 4% grade reduces the visibility
of the traffic light for on-coming motorists. This will necessitate
placing an advance signal light on the structure.
· The temporary relocation of the 20" CML water line to facilitate the
placement of the foundation of Bent 6 ~ see Advanced Planning Study
2A in Appendix B).
Alternative #2B:
The location of this POC would be approximately 850 feet south of
Nicolas Road (see Aerial in Appendix A). This alternative would require
a new path constructed from Nicolas Road on the east side of the existing
businesses. This would require the acquisition of additional Right of Way,
which is currently deemed as open space (see Parcel Maps in Appendix
D). Apparently the previous developer still owns this Right of Way.
This alternative consists of a 7 span reinforced concrete structure with a
clear span prestressed concrete box to minimize deflections over
Winchester Road. The bridge length will be approximately 500' while the
total length including the ramps will be approximately 820' (see Advanced
Planning Study, Alternate 2B in Appendix B). Additional Right-of-Way
would need to be acquired behind the sidewalks similar to Alternative 2A.
The probable construction cost for this alternative was estimated at
$1,050,000 in 2002 dollars.
Advantages:
6
IMBS. EN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering Consultants
A 'l'i~ Company
il
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
I!
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
· Since the structure is located at a greater distance from the
intersection, viability of the existing traffic light may not be a concern.
· With the placement of a new gate into the high school the distance the
students would be required to walk can be reduced.
Disadvantages:
· If no modifications are made to the school access, students will be
required to walk much longer distances to reach their destinations.
This may promote students to cross Winchester Road at grade rather
than use the POC.
· Additional Right of Way acquisition for the path east of the existing
businesses.
· The temporary relocation of the 20" CML water line to facilitate the
placement of the foundation of Bent 5 (see Advanced Planning Study
2B in Appendix B).
ALTERNATIVE 3 (Pedestrian Undercrossing):
Alternative #3 consists of placing a pedestrian undercrossing (PUC) under
Winchester Road, which would allow students' (and other pedestrians) to
cross Winchester Road while staying away from vehicular traffic. The
location of this PUC would be approximately 225' south of the
intersection with Nicolas Road (See Advance Planning Study 3 in
Appendix B).
To keep water from accumulating and making the PUC inaccessible, a
pump facility would be required. This would include pump, pump house
and water storage box. An Advanced Planning Study was prepared for
this alternative, which includes the pump facility. The cost of the pump
house and water storage box was estimated to be $200,000.
Due to the need to keep traffic on SR 79 North (Winchester Road) open at
all times; Stage construction would need to be utilized. It is anticipated
that the structure would need to be constructed in three stages requiring
temporary shoring. It would also require the temporary removal of the
median.
Similar to the POC's in Alternative 2, the crosswalks will need to be
removed along with the placement of signs directing pedestrians t° the
PUC.
The probable construction cost for this alternative was estimated at
$800,000.
7
IMBSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering Consultants
A ~ Company
ii
II
ii
II
Ii
Ii
II
II
!1
!1
ii
II
II
II
!1
il
ii
ii
Advantages:
· The differential in the elevations between the ground elevation and the
bottom of the PUC is much less than the POC's, therefore the ramps
are much shorter.
· The shorter ramps will reduce the costs.
· The shorter ramps also reduce the distance the pedestrians would be
required to walk.
· The amount of Right-of-Way acquisition would be minimized.
Disadvantages:
· A need to construct a pump facility.
· The PUC would be hidden from view, which raises numerous safety
concerns.
· Stage construction would be costly and greatly increase the time of
construction.
· The Pump Facility would require annual inspection and maintenance
costs.
· The 20" CML water line and possibly the 15" sewer line would need
to be relocated.
AGENCY COORDINATION:
All of the alternatives investigated, and any that may be proposed or suggested for
further study in the future, will require coordination, oversight and approval by
Caltrans. As long as the Department of Transportation has jurisdiction over this
stretch of the Highway (SR-79 North), they are ultimately responsible and liable
for any structures within their Right-of-Way, and the Local Agency must abide by
their policies and procedures.
This is also tree if any amount of funding allocated for such a project comes from
Federal or State programs.
The criteria for Grade Separation Crossings are found in the Traffic Manual under
Chapter 10 - School Area Pedestrian Safety, Section 10-08.3 (see Appendix G).
The biggest hurdle the City will face is the fact that the existing intersection
between SR-79 North and Nicolas Road is a standard "controlled" crossing.
While a pedestrian structure is feasible from an engineering standpoint, the site
conditions and features may not meet all the criteria that would normally set this
project in motion.
IMBSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering Consultants
A '~ Company
1
iJ
II
ii
ii
II
II
II
SUMMARY:
We have explored the feasibility of constructing a facility across
Winchester Road just west of Nicolas Road, to promote a safer and
uninterrupted crossing for students to and from Chaparral High School. A
summary of the costs (not including any Right-of-Way costs) for the three
different alternatives investigated follows:
· Alternative 1' ....................... N/A
· Alternative 2A .............. $968,000
· Alternative 2B ........... $1,050,000
· Alternative 3 ................. $800,000
* This Alternative was not deemed feasible; therefore no Advance
Planning Study was prepared.
Along with the costs we have tried to show the effects the three
alternatives will have. This leaves the City of Temecula with the option of
utilizing one of the aforementioned alternatives or maintaining the
standard signalized at grade intersection with sidewalks.
II
Il
il
II
ii
il
il
ii
/I
ii
9
IMBSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineering Consultants
A ~ Company
ITEM NO. 4
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
August/September 2002
Prepared By: Amer Attar
Submitted by: William G, Hughes
Date: September 24, 2002
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
1. Margarita Road Widening, Phase I (Interim), Pauba Road to Plo Pico
This project will widen Margarita Road on an interim bases between Pauba Road and Plo Pico. As a
result, Margarita Road will have four lanes throughout City limits. The contractor, R.J. Noble, has
completed the work. Notice of Completion is scheduled for the September 24, 2002, City Council
Meeting.
2. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool
A 25-yard x 25-meter pool will be built at Chaparral High School. The facility will include a smaller
recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker reom facilities, restrooms and showers.
Spray-type play equipment will be included as an element in the base construction bid. The
contractor, California Commercial Pools has completed the work. Notice of Completion is
scheduled for the September 24, 2002, City Council meeting.
3. Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pala Road) Improvements, Phase I - (Widening to
accommodate four lanes from Pechanga Parkway Bridge to Wolf Valley) and Traffic
Signals Modifications at Loma Linda, and at Wolf Valley
Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pala Road) Improvements, Phase I, will give Pechanga Parkway two
lanes in each direction (58 feet in width) from the Pechanga Parkway Bridge to the Pechanga
Casino. It includes re-striping the entire length. In addition, the two traffic, signals at Loma Linda and
at Wolf Valley will be modified to accommodate the read interim widening. This project is complete.
The notice of completion is scheduled for the October 8th City Council meeting.
4. Slurry Seal Program - FY2001-02
This project will slurry seal and protect various streets throughout the City. Work was completed on
time and under budget. Notice of Completion was presented to the City Council on September 17,
2002.
5. First Street Extension - Environmental Mitigation
This project will create approximately 1.49 acres of wetlands along Murrieta Creek at First Street. It
includes construction of landscaping and irrigation improvements, and maintenance of said
improvements for a period of five (5) years in accordance with California Department of Fish and
Game and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit requirements. Bids were opened June 6, 2002.
Award is on hold pending RCFC/ACOE coordination with Murrieta Creek Improvement project.
R:'~vioathlyActivityRepo~C IP~2002~Augus t.doc
6. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - FY 2001/2002
This project will rehabilitate and reconstruct portions of Rancho California Road between Hope Way
and Cosmic Drive. R.J. Noble Company is the contractor. The project is presently under
construction and is approximately 50% complete. Construction is on schedule and it is anticipated
to be complete by late October 2002.
7. Community Theatre - Mercantile Seismic Retrofit
This project will create a community theatre at the old Mercantile building in downtown Temecula.
2H Construction began construction on Monday, September 16, 2002. Presently, the contractor is
performing asbestos removal with demolition work of existing improvements to occur through the
end of the month. Foundation placement is scheduled to begin the first of October.
8. Citywide A.C. Repairs - FY2001-02
This project will repair various road sections throughout the City. Bids were opened on 8/15~02. All
American Asphalt is the lowest bidder. Construction is set to begin September 23, 2002.
9. Children's Museum
This project will construct a 7,500 square foot children's museum. Bids were opened on September
5th. Lowest bidder was RE Flemming with a bid of $347,881. Contract was awarded at the
September 17, 2002, City Council meeting.
10. Rancho Vista Road Drainage Improvements
This project will improve the maintenance of the storm drain system on Rancho Vista Road
immediately adjacent to the MWD easement. The award of the project is scheduled for the
September 24, 2002, City Council meeting.
PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS
None
PROJECTS IN DESIGN
1. Pechanga Parkway (Formerly Pala Road) Improvements - Phase II (SR 79 South to
Pechanga Road)
This project will widen Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pala Road) to its ultimate width from the
Pechanga Parkway Bridge to Pechanga road. The Preliminary Environmental Document
Classification (NEPA) of the project has been determined to be "Categorical Exclusion" with
required technical studies (involving Federal action). The City is currently working with Caltrans'
Local Assistance and City's Environmental Consultant to expedite the environmental approval
process. The consultant submitted plans to RCFC & WCD for review and comment. Work is
proceeding with the remainder of the design.
2 R:kMonthlyAc~ivityReport\C[Px2002~August.doc
2. Pechanga Parkway (Formerly Pala Road) Sound Wall Improvements
Under this project, sound walls will be designed and constructed on the southwest side of Pechanga
Parkway, from Rainbow Canyon Road to the Pechanga casino and on the northeast side along the
residences just north of Loma Linda. The City is currently reviewing the design plans (60%)
submitted by the consultant. The plans were sent to all utilities and affected HOA's for review.
Environmental issues have been identified and documents are being prepared. Work is being
coordinated with the Pechanga Parkway Improvements - Phase II.
3. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek
This project will widen Rancho California Road Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide four additional
traffic lanes. Staff is currently reviewing 100% drawings and specifications for completeness.
Processing for right of way and environmental requirements are schedule for completion by
September 2002.
4. Temecula Library
A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba
Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources
and services. A separate parcel has been created for the library for bond purposes. The application
to the State was submitted on June 13, 2002. Utility services construction will be coordinated with
Pauba Road, Phase II Street Improvements.
5. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road)
This project ~will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate
width. The City has reviewed the 100% Design Plans submitted by the consultant. Specifications
are being prepared. Plans were sent to all utilities and all utility issues are being addressed.
Environmental issues were identified and the City Planning Dept is preparing the environmental
documents. Work is being coordinated with the library project.
6. John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District - Hydrology Study
Under this project a drainage study will be done to compliment the improvement plans being done
by the property ownem. Eventually the City will be the oversight agency for a property owners
sponsored assessment district. The City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. to do a hydrology study and storm drain design
at the June 11,2002 meeting. Draft Hydrology Study was received on 8/6/02. The scope of ERSCs
work is being expanded due to the Hydrology Study findings. An agreement amendment will go to
City Council on Sept 24, 2002.
7. Landscaping and Sidewalk On SR 79 South (Front Street to Pechanga Parkway)
The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk, landscaping, and irrigation
along State Route 79 South between Pechanga Parkway and Old Town Front Street. Review of 1st
plan submittal is complete. However, the project scope was modified, the modifications were
incorporated irate 60% submittal, and the plans were re-submitted to Caltrans. California Sunset
HOA has been given plans for review.
3 R:'uMonthlyActivityRcporfiC1Pk2OO2XAuge~t.doe
8. Temecula Sports Complex
A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built at the corner of Pechanga Parkway and Deer Hollow
Way. Preliminary design is underway, with council approval for the site layout scheduled for 2nd
meeting in October. Utility companies have been notified to provide information on existing facilities
in Pala Road and Deer Hollow Way.
9. Bridge Barrier Rail Upgrade, Rainbow Canyon Road over Pechanga Creek/Del Rio Road
over Empire Creek
This project will replace the existing barrier rails of the Rainbow Canyon Bridge over Pechanga
Creek and the Del Rio Road Bridge over Empire Creek. Simon Wong Engineering (SWE) submitted
the 90% Design documents. City reviewed and returned with minor comments to SWE. A gas line
issue was identified and is being resolved. Final submittal should be ready bythe end of September.
10. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site
A fire station will be built at the Wolf Creek Site. Building & Safety has reviewed second submittal
and provided plan check comments. The architect is to complete final plan revisions and re-submit
the plans for approval by the end of this month. Further progress is now dependent upon Wolf
Creek development plans for southerly side of Wolf Valley Rd.
11. Pavement Management System Update
The project will establish a pavement management program that will provide an ongoing schedule of
needed repairs and provide data that will be. used to prepare budget estimates required to complete
the scheduled work. GIS links, AutoCAD review, and updates to MicroPAVER are included in the
total program. The consultant has completed his pavement survey and is now preparing the final
pavement study.
12. Vail Ranch Park (Near Pauba Valley School) - Add Amenities
This project will add amenities, including play equipment to the recently annexed Vail Ranch Park.
The Community Services Commission approved the Vail Ranch Park Site "C" Master Plan on
February 11,2002. The Master Plan was approved by City Council at the March 26, 2002 meeting.
RHA Landscape Architects/Planners Inc. is the design firm and the first submittal was made on May
3rd. The City reviewed these documents and returned them to the consultant for revisions. The City
and RHA met on 7/31/02 to discuss these comments and revisions are being made. Soil samples
were taken and results were provided to TCSD on 8/28/02.
13. Diaz Road Realignment
Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road.
Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. City staff is currently designing the project.
Anticipated street and landscaping design completion is scheduled for September 2002. Right of
Way and environmental processing are anticipated to be complete by November of 2002.
14. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center
The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front
of the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via
Los Colinas to improve traffic circulation. The design is 100% complete. To avoid construction
during the holiday period, bidding will not begin until October with construction starting in January
4 R:'aMonthlyActivityRepon~C l~2002~Augu st.doc
2003. This project will be combined with PW00-20.
15. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add right turn lane to westbound lanes)
This project will add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Right of
way acquisition at the northeast corner of Rancho California and Ynez is in process with Claim
Jumper Restaurant and Swedish American Corporation signing the acquisition agreements. In-
house design is 90% complete. To avoid construction during the holiday period, bidding will not
begin until October with construction starting in January 2003. This project will be combined with
PW00-02.
16. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle end Jefferson
This project will widen Winchester road between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson Avenue. It will also
add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jeffemon, starting at Enterprise
Circle. Project layout was plotted and discussed with Traffic and the Director of Public Works. In-
house design continues, with recent modifications to the design being implemented.
17. Rancho California Sports Park ADA Access and Shade Structure
This project entails the design and construction of ADA compliant concrete walkways to the
remaining ball fields, 3,4,5,7 & 8. It will also include the installation of two shade picnic/seating areas
adjacent to the snack bar building. Design work is 60% complete and presently in the plan check
phase. Consultant is to resubmit during the week of 9-16-02 for review.
18. Murrieta Creek Multi Purpose Trail
This project will build portions of the equestrian and bike trails along Murrieta Creek within City
limits. The City has received a federal grant of $1,214,000. Caltrans has given the City the
"Authorization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering". Request For Proposals will be sent out to
design consultants by the end of September.
PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING STAGE
1. 1-15/SR 79 South Interchange - Project Study Report (PSR)
This project will modify the I-15/SR 79 South Interchange to accommodate projected future traffic.
The City received the final Value Engineering Analysis Report from Caltrans on May 8, 2002. All the
proposed alignments presented by the value analysis team were rejected. A meeting between City
and Caltrans staff occurred on 9/11/02 to discuss the project. The City's consultant is to provide
additional traffic data and proposed structural modifications to Caltrans in October.
2. French Valley Parkway Interchange, Project Report (PR), Plans Specifications, and
Estimate (PS&E) Preparation
This project will construct an interchange between Winchester Road Interchange and the I-15/I-215
split. Five Qualifications from consultants were submitted on September 5, 2002. Staff, City of
Murrieta, and Caltrans are currently reviewing the Qualifications. Once the review process is
complete, interviews will be conducted with prospective consultants.
5 R:~dvl°nt~lyActivityRep°n~CIPx2002~August'd°c
3. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road
This projsct will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly
to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The project includes the widening
of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commeme Center Drive, and the extension of Overland
Drive across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road. PDC has completed the alignment study and staff has
reviewed copies of the preliminary plans. Staff has reviewed design costs for next year's fiscal
funding. No funding until FY03-04
4. Alignment Study for Murrleta Creek Bridge Between Winchester Road and Temecula Cibj
Limits and Diaz Road Extension
This study will determine the alignment and location of the Murrieta Creek crossing between
Winchester Road to the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will be combined with the Diaz
Road Extension alignment study and design. Coordination with the City of Murrieta, Riverside
County Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers is necessary. The Consultant and Staff met
with Riverside County Flood Control to discuss possible alignments. The consultant is currently
awaiting data from Riverside County Flood Control in order to complete the work on the first draft of
the alignment study. Staff was informed this data could take up to a year to receive (from May
2002).
5, Pedestrian Crossing- SR 79 North at Nicolas Road
City met with Caltrans and sent a letter at their request to initiate this project. Caltrans responded in
a letter that the bridge does not meet their warrents and that they will not support nor will they allow
its construction. The final feasibility report was received from the consultant. Staff is currently
reviewing the options on the report and awaiting direction.
PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENDED OR ON-HOLD
1. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15
This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for
Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis
Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is
revisiting the merits of this project in light of the Project Study Report for French Valley Parkway
Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to
accommodate the new interchange. This project is suspended indefinitely.
2. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements
Project is on hold. Under this project, an additional tleft turn from eastbound Winchester to
northbound Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing traffic volumes. Design is
50% complete. A developer will be doing this project.
6 R ?~viouthlyActlvltyRepor~Cll~2002~A ugus t.doc
3. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase II
Project is on hold. This, project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth Street and
Felix Valdez. The developer of a nearby property may be designing and constructing this project.
4. School Site ADA Improvements
Project has been removed from this year's CIP, Design and construct ADA concrete walkways
and hand railing to athletic facilities at Temecula Middle School, James L. Day Middle School and
Margarita Middle School. TCSD re-allocated the funds.
5. City Hall Parking Lot Modifications
Project is on-hold. Funding has been' postponed until FY 2004/2005. Under this project, a
security fence will be installed between the existing maintenance facility and the western side of City
Hall to secure the parking lot west of the main building. The design of a security fence between the
existing maintenance facility and the western side of City Hall will be performed in-house. A scoping
meeting was held on November 12, 2001. Reseamh on existing base maps for the proposed area
and as-builts for the existing security fence near the maintenance facility is complete. Design and
review of the proposed layout is complete. The project is currently on hold waiting for further
direction
7 R:WlonthlyAcfivityReport~C IP~2002~August.doc
o~
o~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
September 5, 2002
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - August, 2002
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house
personnel for the month of August, 2002:
SIGNS
A.
B.
C.
Total signs replaced
Total signs installed
Total signs repaired
115
3
57
28
4~192
33
69
I1.
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns
III.
ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A, C. repairs
B. Total Tons
IV.
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
VI.
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
15,100
26
1,025
VII.
STENCILING
A. 273 New and repainted legends
B. 730 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
R:~MA[NTAII~MOACTRPT~J U LY 2002- JUNE 2003~,UGUST.02,DOC
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 43 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree
trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 47
service order requests for the month of July, 2002.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 57 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events
and response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of August, 2002 was
~ 23~846.00 compared to ~ 16,200.00 for the month of July, 2002.
Account No. 5402 $ 14,592.00
Account No. 5401 $ 9,254.00
Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 -
CC:
Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- (CIP/Traffic)
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements)
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
JerryAlegda, Senior Engineer - (Land Development)
R:',MAINTAINSMOACTRPT~J ULY 2002- JUNE 2003~AUGUST.O2.DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF AUGUST, 2002
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
08/02/02 27531 YNEZ REMOVED 4 · S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/02/02 27525 YNEZ REMOVED 4 s.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/02/02 27473 YNEZ REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/02/02 27471 YNEZ REMOVED 201 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/02/02 28550 PUJOL REMOVED 226 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/02/02 28495 PUJOL REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/05/02 40520 WINCHESTER REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/06/02 26463 YNEZ 3 LOCATIONS REMOVED 29 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/07/02 SOLANA / MARGARITA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/07/02 BEDFORD COURT REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/08/02 MARGARITA PARK REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/12/02 MARGARITA N & S/O WINCHESTER 6 LOCATIONS REMOVED 21 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/13/02 MARGARITA AT GEORGETOWN REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/14/02 McCABE WEST OF CAMINO ALAGON REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/14/02 CITY YARD CR&R BIN REMOVED 86 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/15/02 41005 WINCHESTER REMOVED 56 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/22/02 32544 SAN MARCO ROAD REMOVED 57 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/27/02 27423 YNEZ ROAD REMOVED 70 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
08/27/02 CORBIE AT TRIANO REMOVED 212 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED I~025
'TOTAL LOCATIONS 26
0
0
0
0
ITEM NO. 5
PO'LICE CHIEF'S REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Domenoe, Chief of Police(~
Jim
September 24, 2002
Monthly Departmental Report
The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring
during August of 2002. During the month of August, the Temecula Police Department's Town
Center Storefront served a total of 223 customers. Sixty-five sets of fingerprints were taken, 39
people filed police reports and 16 people had citations signed of. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn
Fanene participated in a number of special events, neighborhood watch and community-oriented
programs during the month. He also coordinated requests for patrol ride-alongs. Additionally, he
continued to provide residential and business security surveys/visits and past crime follow-up.
Officer Fanene also continued to process City Planning Department submissions of site
plans/conditions.
The POP Teams continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi-Housing" project during the month of
August. Their efforts resulted in the re-certification of seven apartment complexes. The teams also
continued their Warrant Apprehension Program during the month, which resulted in two felony
arrests and three misdemeanor arrests. The POP Teams continued with their proactive patrol
efforts and made five additional felony arrests and 12 misdemeanor arrests. POP Teams also
continued with the homeless persons program, with the goal of assisting homeless in finding
services and aid to help them.
The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP teams and a location to assist the public
with police services. This has greatly increased their accessibility and their ability to serve the Old
Town area. During August, the Old Town Storefront served 144 customers. Twenty-six sets of
fingerprints were taken, 22 reports v, ere written, and 12 citations were signed off.
The traffic team reported that dudng the month of August there were 337 citations issued for
hazardous violations, 99 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 99 parking citations
were issued. During the month there were just eight injury traffic collisions, 94 non-injury collisions
were reported and 15 ddvers were arrested for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET)
program resulted in six citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in
residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The decrease in hazardous and NET
citations issued for the month of August can be attributed to greater enforcement efforts and time
Monthly Departmental Report
Page 2
dedicated to the issuance of SLAP citations. The SLAP program (Stop Light Abuse Program)
resulted in 265 citations being issued, with 113 additional SLAP citations issued on overtime. The
total number of SLAP citations issued dudng the month of August was 378. This is a large increase
over past months' SLAP totals.
During the month of August, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of
147 calls for service. The majority of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the
month, calls and on-sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on four misdemeanors for
various offenses. Officers McEIvain and Rupe continued to provide training to security staff during
the month. The mall officers continued to work on vehicle theft and burglary programs. There were
no vehicle burglaries or vehicles thefts that occurred during the month of August.
The school resource officers were not active during August because the vadous schools were not in
session. They conducted just two school presentations on "Stranger Danger- and "School Safety.,,
A total of seven investigations/reports were conducted/written by the school resource officers dudng
August.
The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part
through its Youth Court program. Officer Michelle Medeiros conducted the 93rd Youth Court
session. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools when needed and conducted follow-ups with
parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. Officer Medeiros worked with "at risk" juveniles
throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. She also assisted
the District Attorney's Office and the Probation Department by providing training during home visits
with incorrigible/at risk juveniles during the month of August.
During the month of August, the Special Enforcement Team (SET Team) of Officers John Wade
and Michelle Larson handled a total of 12 cases. These cases resulted in 13 misdemeanor and 10
felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics
and specialty patrol within the city on a proactive basis. During this month, the team served one
search warrant for narcotics violations, and recovered quantities of marijuana and
methamphetamine.
Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's
staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officer Bob Ridley and assistant coordinator
Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 441 hours of service in August.
Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance and
telephone answering duties.
Community Action Patrol (CAP) Program volunteers have begun their activities, patrolling the city for
graffiti, conducting vacation residential checks and assisting patrol with special logistical needs and
special events. Other duties these volunteers will attend to are business checks and abandoned
vehicles and traffic control. The goal of the program is high visibility, which prevents crime from
occurring. CAP Team members contributed 223 hours of service to the community during the
month of August.
The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources
available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with
patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off read vehicle enforcement and a variety of special
functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 184 hours specifically on patrol in Temecula
during the month of August.