HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-079 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 02-79
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND APPROVING THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD BRIDGE WIDENING OVER MURRIETA CREEK PROJECT
NO. PW99-18.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
A. A project is proposed by the City to widen Rancho California Road
Bridge over Murrieta Creek (the "Project"). The Project will include the widening of Rancho
California Road Bridge an additional 50 feet to accommodate six (6) through lanes of traffic. An
additional left turn lane and a free right turn lane will also be added for eastbound traffic. These
improvements will mitigate existing traffic congestion occurring at peak hours at the intersection
of Rancho California Road and Old Town Front Street. The added bridge lanes will expedite
eastbound access to the 1-15 freeway and improve traffic flow to the business parks west of the
creek.
B. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQX) the City's consultant, EDAW,
Inc., prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the proposed project.
Based on the findings contained in that Study, it was determined that the project could have
potentially significant impacts on the environment without mitigation and therefore a Mitigated
Negative Declaration has been prepared. The Study determined that the bridge widening could
have potentially significant impact on the creek water quality and on certain biological resources
present in the creek. Accordingly, the proposed project, pursuant to the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, will include mitigation measures to achieve a less than significant impact on the
environment. Measures will include implementation of best available technology to ensure that
pollutant concentrations in wastewater discharge do not cause violation of State Water Quality
Control Board requirements. A copy of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration are
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference.
C. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period
and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law and copies of
the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the
Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, Ca. 92589.
D. The City Council has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all
comments received regarding the Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before
it, finds that: (1) The Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA;
(2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the
' environment after mitigation; (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment and analysis of the City Council; and (4) the mitigation monitoring plan set forth in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with law.
Resos 2002/02-79
Section 2. Based on these findings set forth in Section 1., the City Council
' hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project and approves the
mitigation-monitoring plan for the Project.
Section 3. The City Council hereby approves the Rancho California Road
Bridge Widening over Murrieta Creek Project (Public Works Project No. PW99-18).
Section 4. The Director of Community Development shall file a Notice of
Determination in the offices of the County Clerk of the County of Riverside in connection with
the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 24`" day of September, 2002. C5
Ron Roberts, Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 2002-79 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on this 24th day of September, 2002, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Resos 2002/02-79
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Comerchero, Stone
Pratt
Naggar, Roberts
Rancho California Road Bridge
Widening Project
Draft
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Prepared For
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Prepared By:
EDAW, Inc.
3780 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 250
Los Angeles, CA 90010
July 2002
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 Project Location 1-1
1.2 Project Objectives 1-1
1.3 Description of Project 1-2
1.4 Construction Scenario 1-3
2.0 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST 2-1
3.0 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 3-1
3.1 Aesthetics 3-1
3.2 Agricultural Resources 3-2
3.3 Air Quality 3-2
3.4 Biological Resources 3-7
' 3.5 Cultural Resources 3-16
3.6 Geology and Soils 3-18
3.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 3-24
3.8 Hydrology and Water Quality 3-27
3.9 Land Use and Planning 3-33
3.10 Mineral Resources 3-34
3.11 Noise 3-34
3.12 Population and Housing 3-38
3.13 Public Services 3-39
3.14 Recreation 3-39
3.15 Transportation/Traffic 3-40
3.16 Utilities and Service Systems 3-42
3.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance 3-43
4.0 LIST OF PREPARERS 4-1
5.0 REFERENCES 5-1
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MAID Page TOC-1
oaoWaWOcmra Vd 7/aW
Table of Contents
I LIST OF FIGURES
Fieure Pig
1-1 Regional Map 1-2
1-2 Vicinity Map 1-3
1-3 Preliminary Design Drawings Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project 1-5
2-1 City of Temecula ]:and Use Designations . 2-2
3-1 Vegetation Communities 3-10
3-2 Regional Fault Map 3-19
3-3 Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones 3-21
3-4 Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazards 3-23
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1-1
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project Details 1-2
2-1
City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Designations
. 2-4
3-1
Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards
. 3-3
3-2
Lake Elsinore Monitoring Station - Ambient Air Quality
. 3-4
3-3
SCAQMD Air Quality Impact Significance Thresholds
. 3-5
3-4
Maximum Daily Construction-Related Emissions
. 3-6
3-5
Permanent and Temporary Vegetation Impacts
3-12
3-6
Mitigation Requirements
3-13
3-7
City of Temecula Noise Standards (db CNEL)
3-35
3-8
Construction Equipment Source Noise Levels
3-36
3-9
Typical Construction Noise Levels
3-36
APPENDICES
A. Site Assessment Report
Page TOC-2 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
aaoWdWMCmu wd 7MOM
1.0 Introduction
SECTION 1.0
INTRODUCTION
The City of Temecula (City) has prepared this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
(IS/MND) to address the proposed widening of the Rancho California Road bridge over Murrieta
Creek in Temecula, California. This section of the IS/MND describes the proposed bridge widening
project, including the location of the site, the project objectives, and the anticipated construction
scenario.
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION
Murrieta Creek lies in southwestern Riverside County and flows through the unincorporated
community of Wildornar and the cities of Murrieta and Temecula. Murrieta and Temecula creeks
converge to form the Santa Margarita River. The Santa Margarita River flows into San Diego
County, passing through. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton and outletting to the Pacific, Ocean
(see Figure 1-1). Rancho California Road crosses Murrieta Creek in the City of Temecula. As
shown on Figure 1-2, the bridge crossing is located west of Interstate 15 near Old Town Temecula
' (latitude 33029'74" north, longitude 117°09'18" west). The area is characterized by business,
commercial, recreational and civic./institutional land uses on either side of the creek. Old Town
Temecula is located just south of Rancho California Road on the east side of the creek.
1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
In 1998, the Rancho California Road bridge over Interstate 15 was widened to accommodate two
additional through lanes and one northbound on-ramp, creating a bottle neck at the Murrieta Creek
br idge. This condition adversely affects circulation pattems along Rancho California Road and Front
Street, the primary access roads to the Old Town Temecula area. Because there are few bridge
crossings. along Murrieta Creek in the City of Temecula, vehicular access to the west side of the
creek is particularly affected by the exigting traffic congestion. The primary objective of the
proposed project is to improve traffic cir \culation along Rancho California Road and Front Street
immediately east of Rancho California Road bridge. The road width and traffic capacity of the
bridge modifications should be consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Circulation
Element.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project ISIMM Page 1-1
S~01-&ftdwdmW 711"2
LL 7
Q
;i
o -
m
m
=
•a
W
L im\
C U
W m
0 ~
y m
m
I_
d
p
d
a
212
Flo
to
WIC
CC
a
w
%
m
U
- mrn /
'
bB4laB~~
c
CL O
m~~S
r1 o
/yaC yb •~~i6, I
t o
n.
d U
J C
CD
_
-
N
O c
U
H
::-ii
i}>~;
L
j
C
~p
a
W
m
O
• ~
~
J: :
J: J
:'a~:. f:. ~ ~:•!l::::: l.V
l:'
!IS
:
®
:.l
......'l::::':::':::::
Z
%
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project Draft IS/MND
W139RmdmCaii*.RaMBr14,\F4..tFipml-IR,gf.d Mqi 1/1217
r
Soum U.S. Amy Omps of Ends 20000 Figure 1-2
Vicinity Map
NO SCALE
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project Draft IS/MID I/JZVI
1.0 Introduction
' 1.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The City of Temecula is proposing to widen the Rancho California Road bridge over Murrieta Creek
between Front Street and Diaz Road near Old Town Temecula. The existing bridge accommodates
two lanes of through-traffic and a left-tum lane in each direction with a sidewalk along the north
side. The widened Rancho California Road bridge would accommodate two through-lanes with a
left-turn lane in the westbound direction and three-through lanes, two left-turn lanes, and a right-turn
lane in the eastbound direction. A.sidewalk would be reconstructed on the north side of the bridge
and pedestrian crossings would be established at both ends of the bridge. Rancho California Road
would be widened at the northwest and southwest corners of Front Street and along the south side
of the eastbound approach. Details of the construction process are described below under
Construction Scenario. Table 1-1 provides a general comparison of the bridge with and without the
project. .
Table 1-1. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project Details
Number of Lanes
Length
Width
Support
Sidewalk
Columns
Existing Bridge
2 EBT; I EBL;
361'3"
71'9"
16
north side
2 WBT; 1 WBL
Proposed Bridge
3 EBT; 2 EBL;
361'3"
121'9"
28
south side (temporary)
1 EBR; 2 WBT
(max.)
north side (permanent)
1 WBL
Notes: .
EBT= aw(bouud through lane,, EBL= mstbawd'kR-mm lane; EBR= eastbound right-turn lane; WBT= westbound through lane;
wBL=westbound left-tum lane
The Rancho California Road bridge was constructed in 1970. The original five-span continuous
structure bridge consisted of a cast-in-place, conventionally reinforced concrete box girder on two-
column bents supported by a combined footing on driven piles. In the mid-eighties, the bridge was
widened in kind by adding another column on each side, in line with the existing supports. The
proposed bridge widening project would involve the construction of twelve additional support
columns. As shown on Figure 1-3, the bridge would be widened on both sides with four new bridge
supports on the north (upstream) side of the bridge and eight new supports on the south
' (downstream) side of the bridge. Structural design considerations include the need to align bridge
Page 14 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
SeYOf-r"eom,abn..pr 711"2
WIh
5
ifa
Q 00
Qm
a
as
a
U
0
3
r
8
ST+"
.i
3
F
~
a
qq
A
q
I
i
d
8:•
Y
Q
1®
1.0 Introduction
' support columns with the existing columns in order to accommodate the existing flow characteristics
of the river and minimize turbulent flow and scour potential. All foundations would be designed to
withstand the 100-year flood. The widening portions of the bridge.would be designed and
constructed such that it will not reduce the existing freeboard r. This would be achieved by
constructing the low chord (lowest beam) elevation of the widened portion above the current low
chord elevation.
Specific measures have been incorporated into the bridge design to address scour potential,
liquefaction hazards, and lateral spreading potential. Thesemeasuresinclude arowofstonecolumns
parallel to and in front of the eastern abutment and pilings, riprap slope protection, and subsurface
concrete armor units. These features are described below.
1A CONSTRUCTION SCENARIO
All construction activities within the 100-year floodplain would be undertaken duringthe dry season
(April l to November 30). Overall, the entire project would require approximately nine months to
complete. The bridge would remain open to vehicular and pedestrian traffic throughout the
' construction period. Temporary lane closures may be required for certain construction operations
such as the closure pour, however, these lane closures would be infrequent and primarily limited to
non-peak traffic hours.
The construction boundaries within the channel (including pedestrian and equipment access routes)
would be clearly marked and all activities would occur within the designated "disturbance areas."
The areas of disturbance would extend no more than 50 feet beyond the edge of the widened bridge
to the north and south. Staging of construction equipment would occur only on previously cleared,
graded, or paved areas (including streets) or level areas where grading and vegetation removal are
not required. No overnight staging of large construction equipment would occur in channel invert.
The following is a description of the main design features of the bridge and the expected steps
involved in its construction. First, a path would be cleared on each side of the structure within the
expected area of disturbance. Once the limits of construction are clearly defined, work would begin
on the bridge foundations. If necessary, soil removed for construction of the column foundations
and scour protection features would be hauled off-site for disposal. Large diameter cast-in-drilled
' r Freeboard is defined as the vertical distance between the level of the water surface and a point of interest on
the structure, in this case the lowest bridge beam (low chord).
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project ISIMND Page 1-7
Sr 01-rwoe~ vd 711"2
1.0 Introduction
hole (CIDH) piles would be used for supporting the widened bridge. Once the foundation is in place,
steel forms would be used for the construction of the columns, which would extend from the large
diameter piles. A temporary wooden bridge, commonly called "falsework," would then be
constructed on both sides of the existing bridge to serve as a platform for the proposed structure.
Falsework would extend across the entire creek width and would serve as a platform to support
construction of the wooden forms for building the concrete box girders. This temporary structure
would be supported by "falsework pads" consisting of timber members. Steel reinforcement bars
(rebar) would be placed inside the column forms to structurally tie the columns to the piles, and
concrete would then be poured into the forms. Once the concrete in the columns is cured, the
falsework would be completed and the widened roadway or "deck" would be constructed on both
sides of the bridge. The concrete box girders would be constructed in place and bridge abutments
would be constructed to stabilize the side slopes and provide a pedestal on which to structurally
secure each end of the widened bridge. The bridge abutments would be designed to withstand the
100-year flood conditions and would include the driving of steel piles to support a concrete
foundation on which the bridge abutment would be constructed. Following construction of the box
girders and bridge abutments, forms would be constructed for the deck, rebar would be installed, and
the deck would be poured.
Stone columns would be installed at mid-slope, parallel to and in. front of several piles along the
eastern abutment. The columns would be installed approximately 7.5 feet apart, between the piles.
A total of nine columns would be installed, six on the south side of the abutment and three on the
north side.
Subsurface scour protection features would be installed under the widened bridge. Interlocking
concrete armor units (A-.lac&) would be installed around each pier column. A closed-cell concrete
mat (Armorflex') would also be installed under the entire bridge, extending approximately 15 feet
upstream and 10 feet downstream from the edge of the widened deck. These scour protection
features would be buried approximately three feet under the bridge and covered with soil. Riprap
slope protection would tie installed along both banks under the bridge.
A-lacks units are reinforcement units that are assembled into a highly permeable, interlocking marix. The
voids in the matrix me filled with soil and provide a stable base for support Installation of A-Jacks is similar
to installation of a ripmp bank with toe protection.
' Atmorflex mats consist of machine compressed cellular concrete blocks of a unique interlocking shape that
are made up into mats for easy handling on site. The blocks are then cabled longitudinally by means of
galvanized steel aircraft or polyester cables.
Page 1-8 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS5TN .
Saar-&o dicd vd 711MU
1.0 Introduction
Installation of seismic steel jackets around the existing bridge columns would require dewatering up
to 10 feet below the existing creek bed. Wastewater would be treated and discharged under an
NPDES permit for construction dewatering. Installation of the piers would require boring to depths
of 90 feet; however, dewatering would not be required for installation of the piers.
The design of the.proposed bridge and roadway improvements would be in accordance with City of
Temecula Department of Public Works standards. Contract documents for the construction of the
project would incorporate provisions regarding standard construction practices including, but not
limited to, worker and public safety measures, construction equipment operation and maintenance,
erosion and drainage control, traffic control, placement of fill materials and disposal of excavated
soil, and environmental mitigation requirements. A "safe construction practices" plan would be
prepared and implemented in accordance with California Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (CaIOSHA) requirements for worker and, public safety during construction. The
construction contractor would be responsible for properly implementing the required Best
Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent sediments and pollutants from discharging to adjacent
surface waters.
' Approximately 8 to 12 construction workers would be required to construct the widened bridge.
Construction crews would access the construction site from Interstate 15 or surface streets via
Rancho California Road, Front Street, and Diaz Road. Generally, the following pieces.of heavy
equipment maybe operated during construction:
• 1 Loader
• 1 Backhoe
• 1 Concrete pump
• I Crane
• 2 pickup trucks
1 Pump (dewatering)
• I Electric generator
• 1 Air compressor
• 1 Forklift
• 1 Dozer
• 2 Concrete trucks
• 1 Pile driver
1 Drilling machine
• 1 High side end dump truck
• 2 Delivery trucks
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/lolldD Page 1-9
Sv01-ho.* ri••.Vd 711w2
1.0 Introduction
This page left intentionally blank.
Page 1-10 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
Sara-ron,pe msw
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
' SECTION 2.0
INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
1. Project title: Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project
2. Lead agency: City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589-9033
3. Contact person: David Hogan
City of Temecula
(909) 694-6400
4. Project location:
Rancho California Road Bridge over Murrieta Creek in the City of Temecula (between Diaz Road
and Front Street).
' 5. General plan designation:
Rancho California Road is identified in the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element.
East of the Murrieta Creek bridge crossing, the road is designated as a four-lane arterial highway.
To the west of the bridge, the road is identified as a four-lane secondary highway. In the vicinity of
the bridge, General Plan land use designations are Highway/Tourist/Commercial.(east side of the
creek), Open Space/Recreation (along the creek), Professional Office (west side of the creek), and
Service Commercial (west side of the creek). The General Plan Land Use designations for the
project area are shown on Figure 2-1.
6. Zoning:
The Munieta Creek channel is zoned as Open Space on the north of the bridge and SP-5 (Old Town
Specific Plan) on the south side. Zoning classifications on either side of the creek near the bridge,
include Highway Tourist Commercial, Service Commercial, and Professional Office.
1
Rancho. California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MM Page 2-1'
s~oi-aarbAvd rnsvi
Bp
0 ~.wm
LM
H
CC
HTC
O
BP
P
OS
1
Bp
yN H
cc X90 ~'gRC,,R?q
\ Sc RD
O 15 CC\ OS
eP p
~C ARE °p°~p~ P • TH
cc ~`pw f
G CC
Off'
H P>
Bp HTO O\, 1
JECT ` G O
E H M.
S TC
. 0 OS \ L
O Bp O LM`
/<Bp
H LM
OS H ~9
0
• times`
BP
\ CSS
A
C, AGO RD
C
)W MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
DMMUNFFY COMMERCIAL
BP c`o , p~
GHWAYfrOURIST COMMERCIAL
:10FESSIONAL OFFICE
~RVICE COMMERCIAL
5SINESS PARK
JBLICIINSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES
PEN SPACEIRECREATION
URRIETACREEK f
MOVA 1996
Figure 2-1
City of Temecula Land Use Designations
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project Draft ISMND
60139Rm.hn Cd4rro aAaad Bd4AFgm.V',,.2-/ciyafT.o.[.u.¢ 112201
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
7. Description of project:
The City ofTemeculais proposing to widen the Rancho California Road Bridge over Murrieta Creek
between Front Street and Diaz Road near Old Town Temecula The existing bridge accommodates
two lanes of through-traffic and a left-turn lane in each direction with a sidewalk along the north
side. The widened Rancho California Road bridge would accommodate two through-lanes with a
left-turn lane in the westbound direction and three-through lanes, two left-turn lanes, and a right-turn
lane in the eastbound direction. A sidewalk would be reconstructed on the north side of the bridge
and pedestrian crossings would be established at both ends of the bridge. Rancho California Road
would be widened at the northwest and southwest corners of Front Street and along the south side
of the eastbound approacli. In general, bridge widening activities would include the following major
components:
Vegetation would be cleared on each side of the bridge within the expected area of disturbance.
• A coffer dam would be constructed around the existing columns for de-watering operations.
Steel column casings would be installed on the existing columns.
• A single row of stone columns would be installed in front of the eastern abutment.
' Soil would be removed and large diameter cast-in-drilled hole (CIDM piles would be
constructed to anchor the new bridge support columns.
Steel forms would be used to construct the new columns.
Steel reinforcement bars (rebar) would be placed inside the column forms to structurally tie the
columns to the piles, and concrete would then be poured into the forms.
• Bridge abutments would be constructed to stabilize the side slopes and provide a pedestal on
which to structurally secure each end of the widened bridge.
A temporary wooden "falsework" structure would be constructed on both sides of the existing
bridge to serve as a platform for the structure. Falsework would extend across the entire creek
width and would serve as a platform to support construction of the wooden forms for building
the concrete box girders.
• Once the concrete in the columns is cured, the falsework would be completed and the widened
roadway or "deck" would be constructed on both sides of the bridge.
• Concrete box girders would be constructed in place.
• Following construction of the box girders and bridge abutments, forms would be constructed for
the deck, rebar would be installed, and the deck would be poured.
• . Falsework would be removed after the superstructure prestressing operation.
• Soil would be removed to 984 feet above mean sea level (msl).
' Armoflex and Ajacks would be installed and covered with soil.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MM Page 2-3
sego:-GiensaVd. 7/1"2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
' All construction within the 100-year floodplain would be undertaken during the dry season (April
I to November 30) and the project would require approximately nine months to complete.
Construction boundaries (including pedestrian and vehicle access routes) would be clearly marked
and all activities would occur within the designated "disturbance areas." The area of disturbance
would extend no more than 50 feet from the edge of the proposed bridge deck on either side. Staging
ofconstruction equipment would occur only on previously cleared, graded, orpaved areas (including
streets) or level areas where grading and vegetation areas are not required.
8. Surrounding land uses and setting:
The Rancho California Road bridge is located near Old Town Temecula in the central western
portion of the city. In general, the Rancho California Road bridge is surrounded by business park,
retail, and some residential development on both sides of the creek. Existing and planned land uses
in the vicinity of the bridge are described in greater detail below.
Existing Land Use
' Murrieta Creek
Murrieta Creek, located in southwestern Riverside County, drains an area of approximately 220
square miles and is an important component of the Santa Margarita River watershed, which
encompasses approximately 750 square miles. The creek is fed by two main tributaries, Santa
Gertrudis Creek and Warm Springs Creek. The Warm Springs Creek confluence is approximately
two miles upstream of the bridge, whereas Santa Gertrudis Creek is located approximately three
miles upstream ofthe project site. Effluent released from the Santa Rosa Water Reclamation Facility
(SRWRF) provides a source of high-nutrient water into the creek, which acts to support vegetation
along the creek bed. The SRWRF outfall is located just upstream of the Santa Gertrudis Creek
confluence.
.The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) currently
conducts regular vegetation mowing and sediment removal within the creekbed to maintain flow,
as prescribed in the Floodplain Maintenance Plan (FMP) for Murrieta Creek. Under the FMP, the
majority of the channel is subject to annual maintenance in the vicinity of the Rancho California
Road bridge. A narrow corridor of vegetation along the eastern bank of the creek is subject to
' mowing once every two years. The environmental conditions that typically exist in the Murrieta
Page 24 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
sv02-CfimW-Md 711"2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
' Creek channel at the Rancho California Road bridge are described below. These conditions reflect
the ongoing FMP maintenance activities.
At the bridge, streamflow appears to be perennial with a relatively wide low-flow channel
attributable primarily to discharges by the SRWRF. Cattail and buhush are the principal obligate
wetland species associated with the low flow and saturated soils, whereas willows (salix spp.) and
mulefat (Baccharis salicifolia) are the dominant riparian species. This stretch of the creek,
dominated by nonnative grasslands and ephemeral wetlands, is highly disturbed with development
adjacent to the uplands, approximately 25 to 100 feet from the channel banks.
Adjacent Development
South of the bridge in the Old Town Temecula community, land uses adjacent to the creek include
multi-family and single-family residential developments and specialty (tourist-serving) retail uses.
The majority of the specialty retail stores are located along Front Street in Old Town Temecula,
which maintains an "Old West" frontier town theme. The majority of residential development near
Old Town Temecula is located to the west of the creek.
' In the immediate vicinity of Rancho California Road, the land uses along the western side of
Murrieta Creek transition from residential developments to business park uses. On the eastern side
of Murrieta Creek, land uses near Rancho California Road include visitor-serving retail; however,
they no longer follow the "Old West" theme, including such modem appearing facilities as gas
stations, mini-markets, and fast food restaurants: These facilities are more oriented toward serving
highwaytravelers than Old Town tourists. Progressing upstream to Winchester Road, business parks
become the predominant land use type along Murrieta Creek.
Planned Land Use
Adjacent land use designations from the City of Temecula General Plan are consistent with the
existing land uses described above. The project site is designated Open Space/Recreation, while
surrounding property is designated Highway/fourist/Commerciali Professional Office, and Service
Commercial. The land use categories and their approximate location in relation to the creek are
described in Table 2-1 below (also refer to Figure 2-1).
The Rancho California Road bridge lies within the Specific PlanningArea No. 5 (Old Town).
' Specific plan areas are intended to provide a comprehensive planning approach to areas with special
Rancho California Road Bridge widening Project IS/MM Page 2-5
s:r02-0M:MMya 711"2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
Table 2-1
City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Designations
Land Use Designation
Description
Location
Open Space/Recreation
Public and private areas of permanent open
The Murrieta Credo corridor.
(Floor area ratio of.01 6. 1)
space for such uses as parks, golf courses,
recreation facilities, natural open space,
recreation trails, greenbelts, lakes, and
. undevelopable portions of floodplains along
waterways.
Highway/rourist Commercial
Commercial uses I adjacent to major
East of Murders. Greek north and south
(floor area ratio of.25 to 1.0)
transportation routes and oriented to the
of Rancho California Road
needs of tourists and recreation enthusiasts.
Professional Office
Single or multi-tenant office buildings with
West of Murrieta Creek south of
(Floor area ratio of.3 to 1.0)
uses such as legal, design, engineering, or
Rancho California Road
medical offices; corporate and governmental
offices; and community facilities.
Service Commercial
Commercial uses that typically require
West of Murrieta Credo, north of
(Floor area ratio of.5 to 1.5)
extensive floor area such as home
Rancho California Road.
improvement stores, discount retail stores,
furniture stores, and auto dealerships.
development opportunities. Thekeyobjectives are to "preserve historic character, enhance economic
vitality; improve public facilities and services; and to encourage infill development."
9. Other public agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement.)
The Rancho California Road bridgemodifications would result in permanent and temporary impacts
to jurisdictional wetlands and "Seaters of the U.S." As such, a California Department of Fish and
Game (CDFG) 1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement and a U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers (ACOE)
Clean Water Act Section 404 permit would be required for project construction. Pursuant to Clean
Water Act Section 401, a certification/waiver from the State Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) would also be required for project construction. Other permits and/or approvals for this
project would include a RWQCB Dewatering Permit and City of Temecula construction-related
permits (encroachment permit, etc.).
Page 2-6 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
s~or-ca.knn..ya vtso:
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
n
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors chocked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is
a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
❑ Biological Resources
Hazards & Hazardous Materials
❑ Mineral Resources
❑ Public Services
F] Utilities/Servioe Systems
❑ Agricultural Resources
❑ Cultural Resources
❑ Hydrology[Water Quality: Land Use/Planning
F]Noise Population/Housing
FIRecreation ❑ Transportation/ltaffic
1-1 Mandatory Findings of Significance
❑ Air Quality
F]Geology/Soils
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared
-n I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be
a significant effect in this case because revisions to the project have been made by or agreed to by the
applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
El I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a `potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless
mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the
earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it
must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed -
F1 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the project, nothing further is required.
Signature
Printed Name
Date
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 2.7
SM02-QwAr.L pd 711"2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
Pot-
PotmWllY significant With Lou Thau
- Significant n Inue& Suuoortinff Information Source iote4 Impact No loduct
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on.a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not ❑ ❑ a Fx]
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of ❑ ❑ ❑ n
the site and its surroundings?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would ❑ ❑ ❑
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
H. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - In determining whether
impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
' Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the
California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use
in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the
project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of ❑ -1 1-1 Fx]
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Williamson Act contract?
c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to F]
-1 F1 ❑
their location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
M. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
' determinations. Would the project:
Page 2-8. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/NND
. carol-()each: cud 711w2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
' elfi nt y
Potentially Slplacant With I.a.76u
Signifi m t
_Issua & Suooortine Information Sources Impact 1 rw ted Imam No Impact
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air ❑ ❑ a ❑
quality plan?
b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
existing or projected air quality violation?
c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any ❑ ❑ ❑
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment
under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emission which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant F1
concentrations?
-1 n F]
e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
❑
❑
X
❑
' IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through
habitat modifications
on an
s
ecies identified as a candidate
❑
1XI
❑
❑
,
y
p
,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or ❑ ❑ ❑
other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected ❑ Fx] ❑ ❑
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, veinal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,' other
means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident ❑ ❑ a ❑
or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native
' resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 2-9
mau-ardor.W 711sn2
.
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
Pote
Pohatlally slgWn<md aar WlW I.aa 7Lan
siyaincaar bntlp8oa ftdficwt
Issues & Supporting Information Sources fmoAct rpemparwd Impact No Im"d
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting ❑ ❑ ❑
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy
or ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Plan, Natural Communities Conservation Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan?
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in § 15064.5?
❑
❑
❑
❑
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeolo
ical resource
t t
15064
5?
❑
❑
a
a
g
pursuan
o §
.
' C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geologic feature?
❑
❑
X
d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
❑
❑
❑
❑
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or,based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ [-x I ❑
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑
Page 2-10 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/M ND
smog-taamccwd 7115m2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
Poteotlally
eote
Skiac"sot With
I.es lLan
Issua & Sunnornn Informsnon Sources
skoffic-t
r .ct
huayaaon
r w
Sitnifl a t
met
No Impact
iv) Landslides?
❑
❑
❑X
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
❑
❑
R
❑
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
t
d
ld b
t
bl
lt
f th
❑
[
El
e projec
, an
wou
ecome uns
a
e as a resu
o
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the
1994
l
i
k
t
lif
U
if
B
ildi
C
d
ti
b
t
ti
❑
❑
a
❑
crea
an
r
s
o
e
n
orm
u
ng
o
e (
ng su
s
a
s
or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic
❑
❑ ❑
tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers
are not available for the disposal of waste water?
' VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would
the project:
a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment ❑ a ❑
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment ❑ ❑ ❑
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
❑
❑
a
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous F1 1 F1 n
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 2-11
saO2•cweaaAVd 711sa2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
' Pp ly
P9teaaa0y Sigdaii6ead With less 77un
*Aaeant Mdtafion Sigdfl-t
Issues & Supportine Information Sourer Impact Ixoroo ted Impact No Impact
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
❑
a
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
£ For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
❑
❑
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working .
in the project area?
g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ❑ ❑ ❑
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
L Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury
❑
❑
❑
a
or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands
are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
'
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the
project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
a
❑
❑
requirements?
b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
❑
❑
❑
a
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or ❑ a ❑
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream
or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion
or siltation on- or off-site?
7
Page 2-12 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/ ND
sen02-CkaH .pd 711."2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
ssues & Suppornnr Information Source
Polentlally
siedacmt
Impact
pot-day
' Sipdnraut with
Mitlpdw
Iprnrporated
I.w T6ap
sieniae t
Impact
o Impact
d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
❑
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream
or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-
site?
e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
❑
❑
❑
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
£ Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ I-x] ❑ ❑
g. Place housing within a I00-year flood hazard area as mapped ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
L Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which
would impede or redirect flood flows?
i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury ❑ ❑ ❑
or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of
the failure of a levee or dam?
j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ FI ❑ a
DL LAND USE AND PLANNING- Would the project:
a. Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ Fx]
b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation ❑ ❑ [-x I ❑
of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but
not limited to the general plan, specific plan local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural ❑ ❑ ❑
' communities conservation plan?
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/M1QD Page 2-13
Senor-Ck.k7 vd 711"2 _
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
' Wff=tuy
Potmtlaay Sigdacaat With I.ex 7Las
SWMC* t hutlptiou Sipdamt
Irma & Suonortine Information Sources t ad r~ted Impact N I aet
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource ❑ ❑ ❑ a
that would be of value to the region and the residents of the
state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral
❑
❑
❑
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan, or other land use plan?
M. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local
eneral plan or nois
❑
a
F;(]
❑
g
e
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or
roundb
i
l
l
?
❑
❑
❑
'
g
orne no
se
eve
s
c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinit
above levels existin
with
ut th
j
t?
❑
❑
❑
y
g
o
e pro
ec
d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existin
without the
❑
❑
a
1-1
g
project?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been ado
ted
within two miles of a
ublic
❑
❑
p
,
p
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
C For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
❑
❑
E
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
XH. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly ❑ ❑ ❑ a
' (for example, by proposing new homes and business) or
Page 2-14 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/KIND
smog-Q AHAHpd rnrror
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
' Potendally
Potentially Sigdticantnt With lea Than
Slcafaeant Mitigation sigaaicant
Ines & Suoaortinn Informatlon Sonrca Impact l ted N uact No Impact
indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating ❑ ❑ ❑ a
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ❑ ❑ ❑ a
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
XM. PUBLIC SERVICES
a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
'
Fire protection?
❑
❑
❑
Police protection?
❑
❑
Schools?
❑
❑
❑
n
Parks?
❑
❑
❑
Other public facilities?
❑
❑
❑
I -x]
XIV. RECREATION
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood a ❑ ❑ ❑
and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or
he accelerated?
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 2-15
srao]-(].MX*d 711"2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
Potentially
Potatiaay SImIncant With Len Than
slpianpt Natipaon Slpiannt
Inua & Supnornne Inrormanon Sources Impact Ipeorppnted Impact No Impact
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the ❑ ❑ a
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATIONfMAFFIC - Would the project:
a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to ❑ ❑ a ❑
the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e,
result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle
trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service
t
d
d
bli
h
th
t
t
d b
t
t
❑
❑
❑
s
an
ar
a
e coun
y conges
ion managemen
es
s
e
y
agency for designated roads or highways?
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
i
i
t
ff
l
h
i
l
th
t
lt
i
l
ti
❑
❑
❑
ncrease
n
ra
ic
eve
s or a c
ange
n
oca
on
a
resu
s
n
substantial safety risks?
d. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g, sharp
curves or da
atible uses (e
e
ous i
te
sectio
s) or incom
❑
❑
.g.,
ng
r
n
r
n
p
farm equipment)?
e. Result in inadequate emergency access?
F1
❑
❑X
❑
£ Result in inadequate parting capacity?
❑
❑
Ix]
❑
g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting ❑ ❑ ❑ a
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILTPIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the
project:
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
. Regional Water Quality Control Board?
I- I
Page 2-16 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project is7i ND
carol-CAmWMvd 711"2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
PateatianY
PWeoaaaY Sieolaeaot WlW laaa Thau
Sipdacant MRIPOOn sfgniamt
INUM & SoonOrNne Information Soarea
Imowt
Ineoro Xw
Imoad
No Imoad
b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or ex
ansion of existin
❑
❑
❑
a
p
g
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water
d
i
f
iliti
i
f
i
ti
f
iliti
th
❑
❑
❑
ra
nage
ac
es or expans
on o
ex
s
ng
ac
es,
e
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project
from existin
entitlements and resources
or are new or
❑
❑
❑
❑
g
,
expanded entitlements needed?
e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider
which serves or ma
serve the
roject that it has ade
uate
❑
❑
❑ .
E
y
p
q
capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to
' the provider's existing commitments?
E Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the
roject's solid waste dis
osal ne
ds?
❑
a
a
El
p
p
e
g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations
l
❑
❑
0
a
ated to solid waste?
re
XVH. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but F1 ❑ [,K
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
❑
means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 2-17
saa02-ca«mxvd 711"2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
rot<uaa0y
Potentiaay sl)Cainraat With Lm Thu
siciacmA Mideation swaraot
Issum & Supnortinc Information Sources Impact In roorord Imoact No Impact
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable
future projects.)
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly
or indirectly)
uuo0
Page 2-18 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
Sa 02-0.*W rd VIM2
2.0 Initial Study Checklist
This page left intentionally blank.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 2-19
Sat D}-Qeatl4tFpd 7115.07
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
SECTION 3.0
MPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
3.1 AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
No Impact. The Rancho California Road bridge is not visible from any designated scenic vistas or
'scenic corridors. Accordingly, the widened bridge and new support columns would not affect any
scenic vistas in the project vicinity.
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings,
and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
No Impact Interstate 15, an Eligible State Scenic Highway, is located approximately one-quarter
mile east of the Rancho California bridge; however, the bridge is not visible from Interstate 15 or
' any officially designated State Scenic Highways. Accordingly, the project would not substantially
damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway.
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?
No Impact The current bridge elevation would be maintained and the bridge would appear very
similar to the existing structure, only slightly wider on both sides. The architectural style of the
bridge would not be modified and the new support columns wouldbe placed in-line with the existing
columns. As such, the proposed project would not degrade the existing visual character or quality
of the project site and its surroundings. The bridge widening project would be consistent with the
goals and policies identified in the Community Design Element of the City of Temecula General
Plan.
d. Create anew source ofsubstantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
No Impact. The proposed project would not create a new source of light or glare and would not
affect day or nighttime views in the project area. No street lighting is proposed for the widened
' portion of the bridge.
'Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-1
Sc 03-1~" xnaa~Vd VIM
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' 3.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources
are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and, Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of
Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would
the project:
a. ConvertPrimeFarmland,Unique Farmland, orFarmlandofStatewidelmportance(Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
No Impact. Geographic Information System (GIS) coverages of the affected project area were
overlain with farmland mapping information provided by the California Department o f Conservation
(California Department of Conservation 1998). No Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, orFarrnland
of Statewide Importance was identified within the Rancho California Road bridge widening project
area; therefore, impacts to designated farmland would not occur.
' b. Conflict with existing zoningfor agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
No Impact. The Rancho California Road bridge widening project area is not zoned for agricultural
use and there are no Williamson Act contract lands within the project area; therefore, impacts would
not occur.
c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could
result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
No Impact. As discussed under 3.2(a) above, there is no designated farmland within the area of
potential effect; therefore, impacts would not occur.
3.3 AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air
quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
' Less Than Significant Impact. California is divided into 15 air basins for the purpose of managing
the state's air resources on a regional level. The project site is located within the South Coast Air
Page 3-2 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS5;FN5
SM03-1.9~UWga .pd 7/1601
3.0 hnpacts and Mitigation Measures
' Basin, which consists of all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside,
and San Bernardino counties-including some portions of what used to be the Southeast Desert Air
Basin. In May 1996, the boundaries of the South Coast Air Basin were changed by the California
Air Resources Board (ARB) to include the Beaumont-Banning area In addition, the Southeast
Desert Air Basin was separated into two areas and renamed as the Mojave Desert Air Basin and the
Salton Sea Air Basin.
The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the agency responsible for
protecting public health and welfare through the administration of federal and state air quality laws,
regulations, and policies in the South Coast Air Basin, Included in SCAQMD's tasks are the
monitoring of air pollution, the preparation of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the South
Coast Air Basin, and the promulgation of Rules and Regulations. The SIP includes strategies and
tactics to be used to attain the federal air quality standards in the basin. The Rules and Regulations
include procedures and requirements to implement the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP),
control the emissions of pollutants, and prevent adverse impacts. The SCAQMD elements of the
SIP are taken from the AQMP, which contains the SCAQMD plans for attaining the federal and state
standards. Both the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) have been established to protect public health and welfare; -each
air basin is designated as attainment or nonattainment based on these standards. The federal and
state'ambient air quality standards are presented in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1. Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards
Pollutant
Averaging Time
Federal Standard
State Standard
Ozone 0
1-hour
0.12 m
0.9 m
Carbon Monoxide CO
1-hour
35.0 ppm
20.0 m
8-hour
9.0 pinn
9.0 ppmo)
Nitrogen Oxides O
1-hour
0.053 m
0.25 m
Particulates M
24-hour
150 &
50 &
1 Prior to 1997, the Stare standard was 9.1 ppnL
-parts million pyJm- meta
SOURCE: California Air Resources Board, Air Quality Data Summary. 1998.
The South Coast Air Basin is state-designated nonattainment for particulate matter (PM10), ozone
(03), and carbon monoxide (CO) standards, and federal nonattainment for ozone, CO, and PM10
standards. The closest air monitoring station to the site is located in the City of Lake Elsinore,
' approximately 18 miles northwest of the Rancho California Road bridge. Table 3-2 presents a
summary of the highest pollutant values recorded at this station from 1996 to 2000.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/f44 Page 3-3
Sx 03-lmprt Kdpdm Wd 711"1
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' Table 3-2. Lake Elsinore Monitoring Station - Ambient Air Quality
Pollutant
Avenging
Time
California Air
uali Standards
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Ocone
Maximum Concentration
1-hour
0.09 ppm
0.145
0.099
0.170
0.136
0.128
Days Exceeding Standard
14
1
52
51
45
Nitrogen Dioxide
Maximum Concentration
1-hour
0.25 plant
0.102
0.106
0.084
0.114
0.077
Da Exceeding Standard.
0
0
0
0
0
Inhalable Particulate Matter'')
Maximum Concentration
24-hour
50 ltg/m3
87
139 - 98 112
na
D Exceeding Standard
20
19 14 30
na
Note: Carib= monoxide data were not available for the lake Elsinore or the Penis monitoring station, also within 20 miles of the project site.
or PM,a is not measured at the Lab, Ebuime commit ring station; data are from the Penis monitoring station, approximately 20 miles north of
the site. -
na = mot available
Source: California Air Resoumes Board, Caltjornia Air Quality Data, available at huo./hvww.arb.ca.gov/agd/agd hhm February 11, 2000.
The proposed bridge widening project would involve the addition of three new lanes and twelve new
support columns to the existing bridge. 'Construction activities, which would occur for a period of
nine months, are not anticipated to generate significant air pollutant emissions ( please refer to
response to 3.3(b) below). Upon completion of the project, the widened bridge would alleviate
traffic congestion on the Rancho California Road bridge, which would result in thereduction oflocal
air pollution concentrations associated with local traffic congestion. Accordingly, the proposed
project is not anticipated to conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the Air Quality
Management Plan established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for the air basin.
b. Violate any air quality standardor contribute substantially to an existing orprojectedair quality
violation?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not anticipated to violate any air quality
standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. Construction activities would
involve (1) minor excavation for the support columns and scour protection features, (2) construction
workers' trips, (3) construction equipment operation, and (4) construction material handling and
delivery. These activities would occur for a period of nine months and are not anticipated to
generate significant air pollutant emissions.
Air quality impacts associated with this project were evaluated using the thresholds of significance
established by the SCAQMD and presented in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD 1993).
' The SCAQMD's thresholds of significance for the criteria pollutants are shown on Table 3-3.
Page 34 Rancho California Road Bridge. Widening Project IS/MND
Se103-11ka Atla.".Pd 711"2
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' Table 3-3. SCAQMD Air Quality Impact Significance Thresholds
Pollutant
Project Construction
Project Operation
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
550 lbs/day
550 lbs/day
Reactive Organic Compounds (ROC)
751bs/day
55 lbs/day
Nitrogen Oxides (NO.)
100 lbs/day
55 lbs/day
Particulates (PM,,)
150 lbs/day
150 Ibs/day
Note: No significanee threshold is established for ozone as it is net emitted directly but is a secondary pollutant produced in the atmosphere
through a complex series of photochemical reactions involving ROCS and NO,.
Ibslday -pounds w day
SOURCE: South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993.
Construction Emissions
Air. contaminant emissions during construction activities would result primarily from the use of
construction equipment and trips generated by construction workers and haul/material delivery
trucks. Construction equipment used for project construction would primarily consist ofone loader,
one backhoe, one concrete pump, one crane, one to two pickup trucks, one dewatering pump, one
electric generator, one air compressor, one forklift, one dozer, one pile driver, one drilling machine
for installation of piles (foundation), one dump truck, two concrete trucks, and two delivery trucks.
All of these pieces of construction equipment are not anticipated to be used concurrently-, however,
to present the worst-case scenario and the most conservative estimate, it has been assumed that these
pieces of equipment would be used simultaneously for six hours per day during the nine-month
construction period. As shown in Table 3-4, project-related construction emissions would have a
temporary and less than significant effect on air quality in the vicinity of the project site as these
emissions would remain. below the SCAQMD thresholds listed in Table 3-3. Accordingly, no
mitigation measures are required.
Due to the relatively limited amount of earthwork and the short duration of construction activity, air
quality impacts resulting from the project construction would not violate any air quality standard or
contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation.
Operational Emissions
The widened bridge would alleviate traffic congestion on the Rancho California Road bridge, which
' would result in the reduction of local air pollution concentrations associated with local traffic
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-5
SW03-1Wp UldvdamWd 7116111
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Table 34. Maximum Daily Construction-Related Emissions
Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)
Emission Source CO ROC NO PM
Construction equipment 6.00 7.89 85.62 7.78
Construction workers' trips" 8.67 0.97 2.01 0.03
Construction trucks` 8.17 0.36 1.69 0.01
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 16.84 9.21 89.32 7.82
Daily Iluesholds for Construction Emissions (lbstday) 550 75 100 150
Do emissions exceed significance thresholds? No No No No
Notes:
a. Includes the following pieces of equipment operated six hours per day. one loader, one backboe, one concrete pump, one crane, one to
two pickup rocks, one dewatering pomp, one dectric generator, one air compressor, one forklift, one dour, one pile drives, and one
drilling machine.
b. Assumes a total of 12 construction workers, two trips per worker and 30 miles per trip (50°/. autos and 50% tight-duty trucks).
c. includes one high side end dump truck, two concrete trucks, and two delivery trucks; assumes 2 trips per truck and 30 miles per trip
1000% heavy-duty trucks).
Source: California Av Resources Board, URBEMIS7G (Version 3.1); SCAQMD, CEQA Air Quality Handbook April 1993.
congestion. Although the widened bridge could accommodate more idling cars at any given time,
the addition of multiple lanes would allow for more efficient traffic flow, resulting in less cuing and
stacldng of cars on the bridge and at nearby intersections. As such, air quality impacts resulting from
I project operation would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing
or projected air quality violation..
c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant. for which the
project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emission which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the South Coast Air Basin is designated as
nonattainment for state PM10, ozone, and CO standards, and federal ozone, CO, and PM,, standards.
The short-term impacts associated with the construction of the proposed project would not result in
a cumulatively considerable net increase in any of these criteria pollutants. Long-term air quality
impacts would not result because the widened bridge would alleviate traffic congestion on the
Rancho California Road bridge, which would result in the reduction of local air pollution
concentrat ions associated with local traffic congestion. Therefore, the proposed project is not
anticipated to cumulatively contribute to a net increase in criteria pollutants for which the air basin
is in nonattainment.
L
Page 3-6 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
Seam-Impam Ma8°aati*Pd 711692
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Less Than Significant Impact. Sensitive receptors generally include the elderly, young children,
and individuals with acute or chronic illnesses; these receptors are more sensitive to air pollution
than other receptors. No hospitals or schools have been identified within one-quarter mile of the
project site. Although some residences are located in the general vicinity, these areas would not be
subject to substantial pollutant concentrations as the project would be short-term and temporary, and
emissions associated with bridge widening activities would remainbelow the SCAQMD significance
thresholds. As such, impacts to sensitive receptors are not anticipated,
e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
Less Than Significant Impact. Paving materials, including asphalt, may create objectionable
odors; however, this would occur fora very short-duration, and the odor would dissipate once the
paving materials have settled and dried. Operation of the widened bridge would not create any
objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people.
' 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game_ or U.S. Fish and
lI ildlife Service?
Less Than Significant After Mitigation. Murrieta Creek occurs within the Santa Margarita River
watershed and helps drain one of the. largest watersheds in southern California. Murrieta Creek
connects with many high quality riparian systems that drain the larger watershed, and provides a
limited resource for north-south wildlife movement between the Santa Rosa Plateau and the
Temecula Creek/Santa Margarita River confluence. Numerous wildlife species utilize this riparian
corridor for migration, breeding and residential use. Permanent impacts from the expansion of the
Rancho California Bridge would occur from new bridge pilings and increased shading of the riparian
habitat. These impacts would reduce ecological space and cover for wildlife travel; however,
mitigation through onsite restoration of important vegetation communities would reduce impacts to
the wildlife movement corridor to a less than significant level.
J
Rancho Cahfomia Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-7
Sen 03-Iwpuc6 ArtHgadatwpd 71IM2
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' Focused biological surveys of the project area were conducted for the recent Murrieta Creek Flood
Control Project Final EIS/EIR (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1999). No federally listed species
were detected in the project area during the year 2000 listed species surveys and none are expected
to occur in the area of potential effect. The proposed project could, however, potentially affect
potential habitat of birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (MBTA). The
MBTA protects all common wild birds found in the United States except the house sparrow, starling,
feral pigeon, and resident game birds. Mitigation measures are provided to reduce impacts below
a level of significance for birds covered under the MBTA.
No sensitive or listed plant species were observed in the proposed project area.
Mitigation Measures
M 3.4-1 Construction within the channel that occurs during the breeding season for raptors
and other migratory birds (February 1 through August 31) would require weekly
monitoring during construction for nesting bird species protected under the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act.
' M3.4-2 All necessary wetland permits will be obtained prior to project construction. Permit
requirements are expected to include a Section 404 permit (U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers), a Section 401 Water Quality Certification/waiver (Regional Water
Quality Control Board), and a Section 1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement
(California Department of Fish and Game). The conditions of these permits will be
adhered to during all stages of project construction and operation.
b. Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Less Than Significant After Mitigation. A formal determination and delineation of wetlands and
other "waters of the U.S." was conducted by Dudek (1992). Results of this determination and
delineation are presented in the Delineation of Wetlands of the Murrieta Creek Flood Control
Project Riverside County California. In addition, a vegetation map for the project area was created
in July 2001. Jurisdictional determinations for vegetation communities presented herein were made
based on Dudek (1992) and vegetation mapping done in July'2001. Due to yearly clearing of the
creek bed by the ACOE and the dynamic nature of Murrieta Creek, the positioning and abundance
Page 3-8 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project ISIMND
SM03-Imwa Mldrado.,+V 7MM
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
of vegetation communities and land cover types likely displays annual variability. In spite of this
on-going flood control maintenance within the creek, the average position of the ordinary high water
mark (OHM) should remain relatively constant.
Three wetland/riparian communities and unvegetated open water or sand land cover types were
defined within the proposed Rancho California Bridge project area (see Figure 3-1). The location
of the OHM was not recorded during the July 2001 vegetation mapping; however information on the
OHM is noted in Dudek (1992). The wetland/riparian communities (ephemeral wetland, freshwater
marsh, and mulefat scrub) and unvegetated open water or sand cover types are within the OHM for
Murrieta Creek. Therefore, the various wetland/ riparian communities and open water/sand cover
types are considered ACOE jurisdictional "Wetland Waters of the U.S." and "Non-wetland Waters
of the U.S." respectively. In addition, these communities and cover types are under the jurisdiction
of the CDFG and the RWQCB. Due to the proposed impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and waters
an ACOE Section 404 permit, a RWQCB 401 water quality certification, and a CDFG 1601
Streambed Alteration Agreement would be required.
Two upland habitat types including non-native grasslands and disturbed habitat were defined within
the proposed Ranch California Bridge project area. These habitat types may be under CDFG
jurisdiction if they fall within the banks of Murrieta Creek. The extent of agency jurisdiction for
upland habitats will be determined in the regulatory permit process. The vegetation communities
and cover types located in the project area are described briefly below.
Ephemeral wetlands are low-lying areas adjacent to creeks, with gently-sloping banks subject to
irregular flooding. Typical species include telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandiflora), Mexican tea
(Chenodium ambrosioides), common horseweed (Conyza canadensis), northern willow herb
(Epilobium ciliatum), common sunflower (Helianthus annus), white sweetclover (Melilotus indica),
giant creek nettle (Urtica dioica ssp. holoserica), cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), rabbits-foot
grass (Polypogon monspeliensis), lowland cudweed (Gnaphalium palustre), barnyard grass
(Echinochloa crusgalli), and smooth tarplant (Hemizonia pungens ssp. laevis).
Freshwater marsh (referred to as "coastal and valley freshwater marsh" by Holland [1986]) is a
community dominated by perennial, emergent monocots, which grow in standing fresh water.
Uniform stands of bulrushes (Scirpus spp.) or cattails (Typha latifolia) often characterize this habitat.
C
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-9
Sn 03.lnpuas_Vftal .wd 7/22W
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' Mulefat scrub is a riparian shrub community that is strongly dominated by mulefat (Bacchmis
salicifolia), in association with scattered willow species (Salix spp.), heliotrope (Heliotropum
curassavicum), mugwort (Artemisia douglasiana), and blue elderberry (Sambucus mexicana). In
addition to the species typically found in mulefat scrub habitat, on the banks of the Murrieta Creek
channel, but outside of the project impact areas are scattered mature cottonwood (Populus fremontit)
and willow trees.
Non-native grassland is a disturbance-related community most often found in old fields or openings
in native scrub habitats. Typical grasses within the region include wild oat (Avena spp.), soft chess
(Bromus mollis), red brome (Bromus rubens), ripgut grass (Bromus diandrus), and foxtail fescue
(Vulpia megalura). .
Disturbed habitat is any land on which the native vegetation has been significantly altered by
agriculture, construction, or other land-clearing activities, and the species composition and site
conditions are not otherwise characteristic of the disturbed phase of one of the plant associations
within the study region. Typical plant species include Russian-thistle, tumbleweed (Amaranthus
albus), sweet fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), horseweed (Conyza spp mustard (Brassica spp.),
lamb's quarters (Chenopodium album), fountain grass (Pennisetum setaceum), and castor bean
(Ricinus communis), among others. Nonnative trees, such as eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.),
pepper-trees (Schinus sp.), and Russian olive (Olea europea), can also occur in this association.
The loss of habitat that is regionally unique, declining, or designated sensitive by resource agencies,
such as wetland and riparian habitats which occur in the proposed project boundaries, would be
considered a potentially significant impact due to the sensitivity of these habitats. Table 3-5 lists the
permanent and temporary impacts to the described vegetation communities, as well as the open water
and sand cover, in the project area. All vegetation under the widened bridge deck is considered to
be permanently impacted; whereas, all vegetation within the 50-foot construction boundary on either
side of the widened bridge is considered to be temporarily impacted. The 50-foot temporary impact
boundary encompasses all areas of potential disturbance, including the footprint of the Armorfelx
and A-Jacks structures. Mitigation measures are provided to reduce the permanent and temporary
impacts of the project to a less than significant level.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-11
Sm03-MmMJVWSat .O 7122102
0 200 0 zoo Feet Figure 3-1
Vegetation Communities
r=zaa
Rancho Cahfomia Road Bridge Widening Project IS/NM
09139 Ram6 CkWm7iN RaadV BOqarn*w* J.L: 511MI
....a. Avmy LAaPa W LN9M s, WAW
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Table 3-5. Permanent and Temporary Vegetation Impacts
Impact Type Impact Area (acres)
PERMANENT IMPACTS
ACOE, RWQCB and CDFG Jurisdictional Wetland and Riparian Habitats
Freshwater marsh
0.068
Mulefat Scrub
0.264
Open Water/Sand
0.031
Ephemeral Wetland
0.034
Total
0.397
Upland Habitats'
Non-native Grassland
0.019
Disturbed Habitat
0.028
Total
0.047
TEMPORARY IMPACTS (worst-case based on 50-ft construction zones)
ACOE, RWQCB and CDFG Jurisdictional Wetland and Riparian Habitats
Freshwater marsh
0.094
Mulefat scrub
0.522
Open Water/Sand
0.100
Ephemeral Wetland
0.081
Total
0.797
Upland Habitats'
Non-native Grassland
0.061
Disturbed Habitat
0.054
Total
0.115
*These habitat types maybe under CDFG jurisdiction if they fall within banks of Murtieta Creek The extent
of agency jurisdiction for upland habitats will be determined in the regulatory permit process.
To meet the objectives of the Rancho California Bridge Widening Project, unavoidable impacts to
sensitive resources would occur. Resource agency policies (i.e.; ACOE, CDFG, RWQCB) require
that avoidance and/or minimization, to the extent practicable, of damages to ecological and water
resources must be demonstrated, that unavoidable damages to ecological resources have been
compensated to the extent justified and adverse impacts to wetlands have been compensated, and
that restoration opportunities for significant ecological resources have been given appropriate
consideration. The measures provided below address these agency requirements and are consistent
with the type and extent of mitigation that would be required for the regulatory permits.
Implementation of these measures would ensure that all permanent and temporary impacts to
sensitive wetlands would be mitigated to a level below significance.
Page 3-12 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
SwW-h,p JVi6ra %vd 7MM
3.0 hnpacts and Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measures
Permanent Impacts
M 3.4-3 In-kind compensatory mitigation will be required for all significant losses of
wetlands and riparian habitat. As indicated in Table 3-6 below, this will require the
creation of 0.797 acre of habitat to compensate for the permanent impacts to
freshwater marsh, mulefat scrub, open water/sand, and ephemeral wetland. This
habitat creation shall occur within or adjacent to the Murrieta Creek system in areas
not affected by the proposed bridge widening or the proposed ACOE flood control
project.
Table 3-6. Mitigation Requirements
Type of Resource
~J
tpact Quantity
(acres)
Mitigation Ratio
Total Mitigation
(acres)
Permanent Impacts
Freshwater Marsh
0.068
3:1
0.204
Mulefat Scrub
0.264
2:1
0.528
Open Water/Sand
0.031
1:1
0.031
Ephemeral Wetland
0.034
1:1
0.034
Total (permanent impacts)'
0.397
-
0.797
Temporary Impacts
Freshwater Marsh
0.094
1:1
0.094
Mulefat Scrub
0.522
1:1
0.522
Open Water/Sand
0.100
1:1
0.100
Ephemeral Wetland
0.081
1:1
0.081
Total (temporary impacts)
0.797
-
0.797
' Pamarcmt i p...h d. shading ftm me widaed -
poNma wma bridge.
Wetland and riparian habitat creation must occur in areas with suitable hydrology and
soils to support the respective habitats (i.e., mulefat scrub, freshwater marsh, open
water/sand, and ephemeral wetland). Habitat creation for mulefat scrub will include,
but may not be limited to, as combination of vegetating the mitigation site with select
container plantings, use of pole plantings, application of a native hydroseed mix, and
a three- to five-year maintenance and monitoring program to ensure that a native
' plant cover is achieved and aggressive nonnative species (i.e., giant reed and
tamarisk) do not out-compete. the native species. The monitoring and maintenance
requirements described below (under Temporary Impacts) will also be applicable to
the 0.797 acre of wetland and riparian habitat creation.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-13
5e 03-h~Wr NOtdmtm vd 7M,02
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Freshwater marsh creation areas will be contoured to provide the appropriate
hydrology and allowed to naturally recruit marsh vegetation such as Scirpus sp. and
Typha sp. It is expected that natural vegetation establishment in these areas will
occur rapidly from recruitment of upstream seed and asexual reproduction. A three-
to five-year maintenance and monitoring program will be required to ensure that a
native plant cover is achieved and aggressive nonnative species (i.e., giant reed and
tamarisk) do not out-compete the native species.
Open water/sand and ephemeral wetlands are currently devoid of vegetation. Open
areas provide structural diversity within wetland communities and could be
incorporated into the mitigation plan. However, additional freshwater marsh or
mulefat scrub habitat could also be created at the mitigation site to offset the loss of
the unvegetated areas at the project site. The site-specific conditions at the selected
mitigation site, as well as discussions with the resource agencies, will determine
whether open water and sand cover, or additional vegetated wetlands, compensate for
the loss of the unvegetated portion of the creek that is permanently impacted.. As
with the other habitat mitigation areas, there will be a three- to five-year maintenance
and monitoring program to ensure that a native plant cover is achieved and
aggressive nonnative species (i.e., giant reed and tamarisk) do not out-compete the
native species.
Temporary Impacts
M3.4-4 Temporary impacts would be mitigated through the implementation of a revegetation
plan designed to minimize the duration of temporary impacts by accelerating the
natural recnritment process within the affected areas. A total of 0.797 acre of
revegetation would occur in portions of the channel and along the lower portions of
the channel slopes in areas that do not conflict with the ACOE's flood control project
for Murrieta Creek.
Based on field observations and a review of composite aerial photographs, the
in-stream wetland vegetation appears to be relatively resilient to the frequent channel
disturbance conducted by the RCFC&WCD. Therefore, the riparian habitat within
the temporary impact areas is expected to recover to its pre-construction condition
' rather rapidly through natural recruitment and regeneration. Mitigation options for
temporary impacts have been formulated to facilitate the recovery process and/or to
minimize the potential for exotic species re-establishment. Therefore, for temporary
Page 3-14 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
Ss 03-LWy X>daad6mwd 7MV2
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
impacts to all jurisdictional wetlands, the areas will be planted with native species,
including tree transplants, as feasible, to enhance the canopy cover. Overall, the
objective of compensating for temporal losses is to facilitate and enhance the natural
recruitment of native species. To further minimize the temporal losses, the removal
of riparian vegetation deemed suitable for nesting will be prohibited during the
period March 15 through July 30. In making this determination, the quality,
composition, and patch size will be taken into consideration.
C. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, other means?
Less Than Significant After Mitigation. The proposed Rancho California Bridge Widening
project would impact ACOE jurisdictional wetlands through direct removal of wetland vegetation
as described in Table 3-5 and through hydrological interruption with the placement of new bridge
pilings. Therefore, this project would require application for a Section 404 permit due to the
' substantial adverse effects on federally protected wetlands. The mitigation measures described in.
Table 3-6 would reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. The mitigation measures
described in Section 3.4(b) may be refined through the ACOE permit application process.
d. Interfere substantially with the movement ofany native resident ormigratoryfish orwildlife
species or with established native resident ormigratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
Less Than Sign~cant:Impact. The current status of Murrieta Creek allows for movement of
wildlife within the banks of the creek, but the limited width of the riparian habitat and extended
length of the stream course does not allow for the system to assume the designation of a habitat
- linkage or wildlife corridor as. defined by Ogden (1992). Currently, there is a diverse mosaic of
vegetation communities in the Murrieta Creek study area, but rapid development in the past 30 years
has encroached upon the riparian system. Additionally, RCFC&WCD maintenance activities have
limited the development of mature overstory and thicket development within certain portions of
Murrieta Creek. As discussed in Section 3.4(a) above, Murrieta Creek connects a north-south
corridor between open space areas of high quality habitat and other substantial drainages within the
Santa Margarita watershed.
' Riparian obligate migratory birds usually choose wide patches of forest or woodland for nesting, but
may use thinner patches for foraging during their migration. It is unknown if. Murrieta Creek
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-15
Sav 03-l^PnrrflN6®^anyd 7MM
3.0 Lnpacts and Mitigation Measures
provides a viable route for movement of sensitive bird species between tributaries. However, the
proposed project could potentially interfere with the movement of certain resident or migratorybird
species, as well as, reptile and mammal species. Avoiding construction during the breeding season
as described in Section 14(a) would mitigate for impacts to resident and migratory bird movement.
Impacts to reptile and mammal species would not be substantial because no listed species are known
for the project area and impacts to wildlife movement would be temporary. No impacts to migratory
fish species would occur in the project area.
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact. There are no known local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources in the
project area. As such, impacts would not occur.
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Communities
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No Impact. Currently Riversid county is preparing a Multiple Species and Habitat Conservation
Plan for Western Riverside County (MSHCP). It is planned that the MSHCP.will encompass such
habitats as Riversidean.sage scrub, and populations of Stevens' kangaroo rat. However, wetlands
resources, although discussed in the plan, will not be affected by the MSHCP implementing
agreements, as they will continue to be regulated by the ACOE and CDFG. The proposed project
would impact wetland resource habitats and non-native grasslands; therefore, the project would not
conflict with the provisions of the MSHCP. Impacts to wetland resources would be addressed
through the application of ACOE and CDFG permits as discussed above.
3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined
in §15064.5?
No Impact. For the recently prepared Murrieta Creek Flood Control Project EIS/EIR, the ACOE
conducted a records and literature search through the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the
' University of California, Riverside. Information obtained from the EIC included data from the
California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP), Office of Historic Preservation's (OHP) Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility,
Page 3-16 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
Sax 03-)ngncr ~(itlsulonxpJ 7/ILO2
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' OHP's Historic Property Data File (dated January 15, 1997), copies of the 1901 USGS Topographic
Quadrangles of Elsinore and San Luis Rey, and a copy of the NRHP listing for the Murrieta Creek
Archaeological Area (MCAA). In 1999, the ACOE also conducted a field survey of the flood control
project area, which encompasses the entire Rancho California Road bridge widening project area.
This field survey was conducted to supplement a comprehensive survey of the creek conducted in
1992 by the RCFC&WCD. The records search and surveys described above are used as the basis
for this IS/MND analysis.
Based on the previous field surveys and records search, 31 recorded historic buildings have been
identified within the City of Temecula. The earliest construction date for these buildings is 1882,
with most dating from the early 20* century. These buildings represent the early settlement and
development of the Temecula Valley. None of these buildings would be affected by the proposed
bridge widening project. Four historic archaeological sites were identified within a one-mile radius
of the creek, none of which are located near the Rancho California Road bridge widening project
area of potential effect.
The Rancho California Road bridge, constructed in 1970, is not eligible for listing on the National
' Register of Historic Places and is not considered an historic resource. Because the project would not
affect any historic resources as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, impacts would
not occur. No mitigation measures for historic resources would be required.
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
Less Than Significant3mpact. Several prehistoric archaeological sites are known to be present
within a one-mile radius of the creek in the project area. Three of these sites are listed on the
National Register of Historical Places (National Register). Most of the sites in the area consist of
sparse scatters of flaked stone from the manufacture of stone tools, campsites, and village sites.
Many of the sites found in the records search may no longer be in existence due to the rapid
urbanization and development of the surrounding area.
None of the sites identified in the records search or ACOE field surveys are located in the area of
potential effect; therefore, buried archaeological resources are not anticipated to be encountered
during the limited subsurface excavation and earthwork required to construct the bridge supports and
' abutments. Also, the .project'.s ground-disturbing activities would primarily occur in the active
floodplain of the creek where buried archaeological resources would not be expected to occur.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-17
Saar-twmn_lrtl;M wd 7aM
3.0 Irnpacts and Mitigation Measures
' Accordingly, the project is not anticipated to cause an adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines.
C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
No Impact. The bridge widening project would involve limited subsurface excavation in an active
floodplain where paleontological resources are not anticipated to occur. According to the City of
Temecula General Plan, there are no sensitive paleontological areas on-site and in the immediate
vicinity of the existing Rancho California Road bridge; the project site and its vicinity also do not
support any unique geologic feature. As such, the project is not anticipated to cause an adverse
change in the significance of a paleontological resource or unique geologic feature.
d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
No Impact. No human remains are anticipated to exist in the Murrieta Creek floodplain; similarly,
no. cemeteries are located in the immediate vicinity of the project site. As described under 3.5(b),
there are several archaeological sites located within one mile of the project site; however, none are
located near the area of potential effect. In addition, the project would involve only limited
subsurface excavation to construct the bridge supports and scour protection features. Accordingly,
the proposed project would not result in the disturbance of any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries.
3.6 . GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence ofa known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
No Impact The Elsinore Fault Zone, shown on Figure 3-2, is one of the largest and least
active fault zones in southern California. There are three faults within the Elsinore Fault
Zone that are designated as Special Studies Zones under the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Page 3-18 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
S~03wk~u_Mptle..pd 7,22M2
fl
i~
l~
WW
O~
Ka
a
Figure 3-2
Regional Fault Map
1 /
I
1
j /
t_
i
CM
3r m
m
r j vLL
LL LL p c
H
w
~
O
p
I 1 P
1
I
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project
Draft IS/MND
00!39 Rm~ab GtlJ^^il^1laoJBNdgelFfBwm~YIRgN
WFmdr Map I/SL41
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' Zone Act of 1972 (see Figure 3-3). The Willard Fault Special Studies Zone, located
immediately northwest of the project site, generally marks the boundary between the Santa
Ana and Elsinore Mountains. The Wildomar Fault Special Studies Zone, is located
approximately half a mile east of the project site. The Wolf Valley Fault Special Studies
Zone, located south of Temecula Creek, is approximately 2.5 miles south of the bridge. The
bridge is located outside of the three Alquist-Priolo special studies zones. Because no
habitable structures are proposed, it is expected that the seismic conditions at the project area
would be satisfactorily addressed through standard construction and engineering practices
as required per Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (1999) and Caltrans Bridge Design
Specifications. Faultsupture is not anticipated at the project site; therefore, impacts would
be less than significant.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Less Than Significant Impact. A major earthquake on any of the faults near the project
site, including the Willard fault, Wildomar fault, and Wolf Valley fault, could generate
strong ground shaking in the general area and could cause portions of the bridge to collapse.
According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the project site is within Groundshaking
Zone II, a County-established zone indicating the level of risk from groundshaking based on
distance from faults and geologic characteristics of an area. Groundshaking in Zone H is
expected to vary from moderate to intense in the event of an earthquake, depending on the
composition of underlying geologic formations, the earthquake's epicenter, and the order of
magnitude of the seismic event. It is expected that the seismic hazards in the project area
would be satisfactorily addressed through standard bridge construction and engineering
practices and site-specific seismic design requirements. The bridge must conform with all
applicable design and engineering requirements as well as any recommendations set forth in
geology and soiLinvestigations prepared for this project.
Page 3-20 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project INNIND
S 03-&e U-HWsW wpd 7122M
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project Draft IS/NM
W139R-d-CaeJam R.dBi4AF4.Av,s.3-3A4~ Pd.o UnMI
Saone: Cky01Tmmla1998aandCiyofMurtift1994 Figure 3-3
® 0 - 2 MILES Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
® Fault Zones
3 .0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
Less Than Significant Impact. The potential for liquefaction in an area is a function of soil
type and depth of groundwater. Soils that are poorly consolidated and combine with
groundwater during an earthquake loose their shear strength and take on the properties of a
heavy liquid. Liquefaction can result in the loss of foundation support, ground failure due
to lateral spreading, and settlement of affected soils. As shown on Figure 3-4, the project site
is located within a liquefaction hazard area. Geotechnical investigations undertaken for this
project identified the potential for liquefaction (lateral spreading) and slope failure near the
eastern abutment of the bridge. However, it is expected that these seismic hazards would be
satisfactorily addressed through standard bridge construction and engineering practices and
site-specific seismic design requirements, including the stone columns described in Section
1.4, Construction Scenario.
iv) Landslides?
No Impact. Landslides are a geologic process that can be induced by seismic activity. This
' process involves the downslope movement of geologic' materials. The stability of slopes is
related to a variety of factors, including the slope's steepness; the strength of geologic
materials in terms of resistance to the downslope stress of gravity; the characteristics of
bedding planes, joints, and faults; and surface water and groundwater conditions. Potential
landslide conditions in the hillside areas of the City of Temecula may pose constraints to
development; however, the project site is not located immediately adjacent to any hillside
areas in the City. The potential for landslides in the project vicinity is considered low and
impacts related to landslides would be less than significant.
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project, which would involve the addition of several
lanes to the existing bridge, would require minor excavation to accommodate the installation of the
bridge foundations, support columns, and scour protection features. This is not anticipated to result
in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.
Page 3-22 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MIdD
Sm O3-LVn _ tluawta Vd MW
n
r
LIQUEFACTION HAZARD AREAS
AREAS OF POTENTIAL SUBSIDENCE
Ckyaf Tamwla 19S3c
No Figure 3-4
Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazards
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project Draft IS/MND
00139A CaW.ni.Road&iddAF!gwrtAFrarc3-4&6. . /aMl
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Less Than Significant Impact. As shown on Figure 34, the bridge is located within a liquefaction
and potential subsidence hazard area. However, it is expected that the seismic conditions, including
liquefaction, lateral spreading, and subsidence in the project area would be satisfactorily addressed
through standard bridge construction and engineering practices and site-specific seismic design
requirements, including the stone column features near the eastern abutment.
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is not located on expansive soil. According to the
City of Temecula General Plan, the project site is located within an area of potential subsidence,
which results from the shrinking of earth material caused by natural or artificial removal of
' underlying support. As described above, it is expected that soil hazards in the project area would
be satisfactorily addressed through standard bridge construction and engineering practices and site-
specific design requirements.
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste
water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
No Impact. The proposed project would not require the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems and would not result in any wastewater generation. Therefore, no impacts
associated with the use of septic tanks or other wastewater disposal systems would occur.
3.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -Would the project:
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed bridge widening project would not result in the use
or disposal of hazardous materials; however, like many other urban streets and freeways in the
' project area, the bridge may be used by vehicles carrying hazardous substances. The proposed
project would not result in any increased hazard to the public or the environment, compared to
existing conditions, and would not create a significant impact.
Page 3-24 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
s 03-iVar_Mmvdmwa 7/2MR
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
No Impact. The proposed bridge widening project would not result in any increased hazard to the
public or the environment through the accidental explosion or release of hazardous materials,
compared to existing conditions. Mitigation measures to address potential groundwater
contamination are provided in Section 3.8(a). If contaminated soils are encountered during
excavation, proper handling procedures would be implemented by the construction contractor and
contaminated soils would be disposed of at a certified landfill. Accordingly, the proposed project
would not pose a significant risk to the public.
C. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances,
or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
No Impact. The proposed project may result in the treatment of contaminated groundwater and
' disposal of a small amount of contaminated soil during construction; however, there are no existing
or proposed schools within one-quarter mile of the project site. As such, the proposed project would
not create a significant impact from hazardous materials near schools.
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment?
No Impact. A hazardous materials database search was conducted for this project (see Appendix A).
As indicated in this report, the Rancho California Road bridge widening project site is not included
on the list of hazardous materials sites. Several known hazardous material sites are located in the
general vicinity of the bridge. The nearest sites are located to the east and south of the bridge along
Front Street and Rancho California Road where several underground storage tanks (USTs) have been
identified. Several of these sites, including county, regional, and state leaking UST's, are located
under one quarter of a mile from the site. In general, these sites are associated with underground
gasoline storage tanks at existing gas stations. These potential sources of contamination are located
outside of the immediate project area, however, and would not create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment from the project. Since the existing bridge is not a hazardous materials
' generator, its proposed expansion is not anticipated to create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-25
SM03-hwaJ Wjamawd 7123M
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
.e.. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
No Impact. There are no airports located within two miles of the site, nor is the project located
within airport land use plan boundaries; therefore, no impacts regarding airport safety hazards would
result. The nearest airport to the project site is the Bear Creek Airport, approximately seven miles
north west of the Rancho California Road bridge. This airport supports light aircraft on a dirt
airstrip.
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
r
No Impact. The project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip; therefore, no impacts
regarding airport safety hazards would result.
g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency. response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project would not result in any road closures or significant
traffic delays during construction. Construction activities would be accomplished in such a manner
as not to affect normal traffic flow across the Rancho California Road bridge; therefore, the project
would not hamper any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. Upon completion of the
project, access to and from the opposite side of the creek would be improved. This would have a
beneficial effect on emergency response or evacuation efforts requiring access to both sides of the
creek.
h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland
fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
No Impact. The proposed bridge widening project would not result in the risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires. The bridge site, surrounded by commercial, industrial, and
residential land uses, does not abut any wildlands. As such, impacts related to wildland fire hazards
would not occur.
Page 3-26 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
S 03-h~ Ml0ya0 Wd 71nM
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' 3.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
Less Than Significant After Mitigation. Under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the
RWQCB implements the water quality certification process for any activity that requires a federal
permit or license and that may result in the discharge of pollutants into "waters of the U.S.,"
including wetlands. As this project would result in the latter, a Water Quality Certification/Waiver
would be required for project construction. For this project, a request for water quality certification
or waiver would be submitted to the San Diego Region of the RWQCB. The San Diego RWQCB
would review the proposal to determine whether the activity would comply with state water quality
objectives identified in the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9) (Basin Plan) and,
subsequently, either issue a certification with conditions or deny the certification. Adherence to this
process would ensure that the proposed project complies with established water. quality standards
pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
' The San Diego RWQCB enforces water quality standards within Murrieta Creek to assure that water
quality-related impairment of beneficial uses forthe creek are minimized. Beneficial uses for surface
water resources in the region were established by the Basin Plan. The following beneficial uses are
applicable to Murrieta Creek: Municipal and Domestic Supply (MUN); Agricultural Supply (AGR);
Contact Water Recreation (REC-1); Non-contact Water Recreation (REC-2); Warm Freshwater
Habitat (WARM); and Wildlife Habitat (WILD). Some of these beneficial uses (e.g., WARM and
WILD) may be affected during construction; however, impacts would not be significant when
considered in conjunction with the required mitigation measures for hydrology/water quality and
biological resources (Section 3.4). The project's long-term effect on beneficial uses would be less
than significant.
The RWQCB implements provisions of Section 402 of the Federal Clean Water Act and, in
particular, administers permitting procedures for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES). NPDES regulations apply to stormwater discharges and area-wide generators of
urban runoff. Under the EPA's Stormwater Phase I Final Rule, NPDES stormwater permits are
required for construction projects that disturb greater than five acres of land and for certain industrial
facilities. The project would disturb less than five acres of land; however, because of the project's
dewatering requirements and the existence of groundwater contamination immediately east of the
' site, a NPDES permit for waste discharges to surface waters may be required. Parties may apply for
coverage under a General NPDES Permit by submitting a Notice of Intent to the RWQCB.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-27
S~03-hv.u-M&g~Vd 7122M
3.0 bnpacts and Mitigation Measures
' The project would require dewatering to a depth of approximately 10 feet for installation of seismic
steel jackets around the existing bridge columns. Groundwater samples conducted at the
northwestern comer of Rancho California Road and Jefferson Avenue in December 2001 indicate
that dissolved-phase methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) is present in the groundwater near the east
side of the creek: Accordingly, wastewater generated by dewatering activities may need to be treated
and discharged under an NPDES permit for construction dewatering. Groundwater contamination
levels are not expected to affect public health or worker safety during construction; however,
mitigation measures are provided to ensure that dewatering activities do not significantly impair
beneficial uses of the creek or violate any water quality standards.
Mitieation Measures
M 3.8-1 Prior to construction, groundwater samples will be taken at the proposed dewatering
locations on the eastern side of the bridge. Sampling locations will be selected based
on the potential for MTBE contamination from nearby sources, including the gas
stations at the northeast and southeast comers of Rancho California Road and
Jefferson Avenue. The sampling results, combined with any recent groundwater
' - monitoring data, will serve as the baseline data for the project's dewatering activities.
Dewatering activities shall be undertaken using one of three methods: discharge to
a sanitary sewer system, transport offsite using a disposal contractor, or discharge
into a storm drainage system or Munieta Creek in compliance with an NPDES
permit. Under each of these options, the City shall prepare a dewatering plan,
describing the basic components of the dewatering system and its planned method
of operations. Specific mitigation requirements for each of the three options are
discussed below.
Disposal in Sanitary Sewer System
Prior to construction, the City will coordinate with the Eastern Municipal Water
District (EMWD) to determine testing, monitoring, and disposal requirements for the
dewatering effluent. Based on the level of contamination identified at the site, the
City will implement best available technology (BAT) economically achievable to
ensure that pollutant concentrations in the wastewater discharge do not exceed the
' disposal requirements. If the treated effluent is discharged only into the sanitary
sewer system, an NPDES permit is not required.
Page 3-28 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
SW 03 -Impart -UWg b vd 7MM
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Transport Offsite
Under this option, dewatering effluent will be removed from the site by a licensed
commercial transportation, storage, and disposal (TSD) contractor. If less than
100,000 gallons per day (gpd) of treated dewatering effluent are generated, no
permits from the RWQCB will be required. If all dewatering effluent is transported
offsite, an NPDES permit is not required.
Discharge into Storm Drainage System or Murrieta Creek
Under this option, the City will coordinate with the RWQCB regarding the disposal
of dewatering effluent in local storm drains or the creek. If contamination levels
exceed RWQCB effluent limitations, the project must comply with RWQCB's
Tentative Order 2001-96 prior to discharging any wastewater. BMPs and BAT will
be implemented to ensure that pollutant concentrations in the wastewater discharge
do not cause violation of any applicable water quality objective for the receiving
waters, including discharge prohibitions. In addition, BAT will be implemented to
' ensure that the discharges do not cause acute nor chronic toxicity in receiving waters.
Dewatering activities will be monitored under RWQCB's Monitoring and Reporting
Program No. 2001-96. Monitoring of groundwater discharge will be undertaken
using "indicator constituents" for petroleum related compounds, to ensure that
petroleum related contaminants are removed from the waste stream.
b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop
to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have
been granted)?
No Impact. Boring samples taken at the project site indicate that groundwater is present from 16
to 22 feet below the ground surface, The new support columns for the bridge widening project
would extend up to 90 feet under the ground surface; however, dewatering would only occur at
depths of up to 10 feet during installation of seismic steel jackets on the existing columns. The new
' support columns would occupy a small portion of the overall creekbed and would not alter the
dynamics of the low-flow channel. Accordingly, the bridge widening project would have a
negligible effect on groundwater supplies, and groundwater recharge along Murrieta Creek.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-29
Za 03-1.w vJMUi6wb W 7122M
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
No Impact. The new support columns would be placed in-line with the existing bridge supports,
as not to alter the normal flow characteristics of the creek. In addition, the current road bed elevation
and freeboard clearance would be maintained so that the flow characteristics of the creek would not
be affected in large storm events. Inclusion of the Armortlex and A-Jacks scour protection features
would also prevent substantial erosion from occurring. Accordingly, the project would not
substantially alter the drainage pattern of the creek nor would it result in substantial erosion or
siltation.
d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
' Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to 3.8(c) above.
e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
No Impact. Widening of the bridge would have a negligible effect on surface water flows and
drainage patterns. After the project, runoff from the bridge would continue to flow to local storm
drains on either side of the creek. Given the relatively minimal increase in paved surface area, the
quantity of runoff would remain essentially unchanged.
f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Less Than Significant After Mitigation. Site preparation, excavation, minor grading; and other
ground disturbing activities could discharge soil and sediment directly into stormwater runoff. Soil
transported by stormwater or discharged directly into the channel could increase turbidity, stimulate
the growth of nuisance algae and aquatic plants, and increase sedimentation of habitat used by
aquatic organisms along Murrieta Creek. Construction activities also have the potential to discharge
hazardous substances such as fuel, oils, greases, and other petroleum products into surface water.
' Hazardous materials that enter water bodies can be toxic to aquatic organisms and other terrestrial
wildlife that inhabit the area.
Page 3-30 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MbiD
Sev 03-1ryrcu,tOt/;aHonxyd 7,2107
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
The project would comply with all applicable guidelines protecting waterquality (particularly Clean
Water Act Sections 401, 402, and 404). As described under 3.7(a), RWQCB Water Quality
Certification/Waiver would be obtained. It is likely that dewatering would be required during
construction; therefore, a RWQCB dewatering permit would also be required which would identify
specific BMPs for dewatering activities (see Measure M 3.8-1). Although construction activities
would occur during the dry season (April 1 through November 30), mitigation measures would be
required to reduce potential water quality impact to a less than significant level.
Miti¢ation Measures
M3.8-2 Construction of the Rancho California Road Bridge WideningProject within the 100-
year floodplain will occur between April 1 and November 30.
1x13.8-3 All construction staging activities must occur at least 150 feet away from. the creek.
Staging areas outside of the designated construction boundaries in the creek will be
approved by an environmental monitor prior to use.
M3.8-4 BMPs will be incorporated before, during, and after construction to minimize erosion
and runoff from construction activities. At minimum, the BMPs will include:
• Equipment access routes will be selected as to minimize ground disturbance
and contaminated runoff.
• Silt fences will be installed at the toe of slopes to prevent sloughing of
material into the channel.
• Cut and fill slopes disturbed during construction will be revegetated with the
appropriate native ground cover vegetation.
M 3.8-5 Measures to reduce turbidity during construction will include, at minimum, the
following:
• No work will be allowed in flowing water and no "wet crossings" will be
permitted. If the creek must be crossed by construction equipment, a
,temporary bridge shall be installed.
• Catchment basins utilizing geotextile filterfabric, gravel bags, orotherBMPs
will be placed downstream of any activity that may cause turbidity in the
creek. Such devices will reduce turbidity to the level immediately upstream
of the project.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
I
M 3.8-6 Conditions required by the 401, NPDES, and 404 permits will be strictly adhered to
during construction to reduce impacts to the aquatic ecosystem.
M 3.8-7 Strict construction site rules for handling hazardous materials will be implemented
to prevent spills and provide controlled storage areas away from the creek
Petroleum products, concrete, asphalt or other coating materials, and other hazardous
materials will be stored a minimum of 150 feet away from the creek and hazardous
materials will be prevented from contaminating soil or entering surface waters.
M3.8-8 Any equipment or vehicles driven and/or operated within or adjacent to the creek will
be properly maintained to minimize leaks. Parking of motorized equipment will be
located outside of the creek and positioned over drip pans.
g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
No Impact. No housing would be constructed as a result of this project; therefore, impacts regarding
100-year flood hazards would not occur.
h. Place within a 100-yearflood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood
flows?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed under 3.7(c), new support columns would be placed
in-line with the existing bridge supports. This would ensure that the project does not alter the normal
flow characteristics of the creek. Also, the bridge has been designed to maintain the current freeboard
clearance. By maintaining the existing freeboard clearance, the project would not alter the flow
characteristics of the creek during large flood events.
i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
No Impact. The project would not increase the potential for flooding along Murrieta Creek. As
described under 3.8(h), the bridge modifications have been specifically designed to be consistent
' with the ACOE flood control project and not exacerbate the existing flood potential.
Page 3-32 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
smw-u .,aruguw~.»pe 712M
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
j. Inundation by seiche; tsunami, or mudflow?
No Impact. The project site is nearly 22 miles from the Pacific Ocean at an elevation of
approximately 1,000 feet above sea level, and there are no large bodies of water in the general
vicinity. Accordingly, inundation by tsunami or seiche is highly improbable. The potential for
inundation by mudflow.in the channel would not change as a result of the bridge widening project.
3.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING -Would the project:
a. Physically divide an established community?
No Impact. The project involves the widening of an existing bridge in a developed area. No
communities would be physically divided by the project. .
b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with
' jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local. coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
Less Than Significant Impact. Rancho California Road is identified in the City of Temecula
General Plan Circulation Element. East of the Murrieta Creek bridge crossing, the road is designated
as a four-lane arterial highway. To the west of the bridge, Rancho California Road is identified as
a four-lane secondary highway. The bridge would provide five through traffic lanes where only four-
lane roads are designated on the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element. The additional
lanes are needed to provide adequate room for vehicle storage between the Front Street and Diaz
Road intersections which are less than 400 feet apart. This additional width would not significantly
conflict with the circulation element since no new lanes would be added outside of the bridge.
Widening the bridge would be consistent with the General Plan, in that it would alleviate the "bottle
neck" at Rancho California Road and allow more efficient traffic flow along the highway and across
the bridge. The improved traffic circulation would be a beneficial land use impact.
The creek is designated as Open Space/Recreation in the City's General Plan. Support columns for
' existing roadways are permitted on open space lands. Although the project would result in some
temporary and permanent impacts to biological resources, the project would not conflict with the
Open Space/Conservation Element of the General Plan. As discussed in Section 3.4, Biological
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MIVD Page 3-33
Sett O]-bnpanr-VNya .pd 7,2=
3.0 Lmpacts and Mitigation Measures
' Resources, mitigation measures are provided to reduce temporary and permanent impacts from
construction of bridge components to a less than significant level.
C. Conflictwith anyapplicable habitat conservationplan ornatural communities conservation
plan?
No"Impact. Refer to Section 3.4(f).
3.10 MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
No Impact. The bridge widening project would involve minimal ground disturbance. Also, there
are no known mineral resources of value to the region or the state within the immediate project area.
Considering these factors, the project would have no effect on mineral resources.
b.. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
No Impact. Refer to 3.10(a) above.
. 3.11 NOISE - Would the project result in:
a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess ofstandards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula General Plan, adopted in 1993, includes a
Noise Element that assesses community noise and contains noise policies and implementation
programs to address the effects of noise related to development of lands under this plan. The Noise
Element provides noise standards to be used as a basis for impact analyses. Table 3-7 identifies
these standards.
r
Page 3-34 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
Se 03-&^ U M adcmvd 7/27.02
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
7
Table 3-7
City of Temecula Noise Standards (db CNEL)
Land Use
Interior Standard
Exterior Standard
Residential
45
651
Conunercial
-
70
Professional office
50
70
Business Park/Industrial
55
75
PublicAnstitutional Facilities
50
70
Open Space/Recreation
-
652
Schools
50
65
Pursuant to Plans and Ordinances No. 2, a maximum exterior noise level up to 70 db CNEL is allowed for
Multiple-family Housing.
Where quiet is a basis for use.
Construction Noise
The Cityof Temecula Noise Ordinance contains specific requirements forconstruction-related noise.
This ordinance requires that whenever a construction site is within 0.25 mile of an occupied
residence, no construction activities shall be undertaken between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00
am. during the months of June through September and between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
during the months of October through May. Exceptions to these standards are only allowed through
the written consent of the City's building official.
Land uses that would be exposed to noise from bridge construction activities primarily include
business and commercial uses located adjacent to the creek on or near Rancho California Road.
There are some medium to high density residential units along the creek south of the project area;
however, these residences are greater than 0.25 mile (1,320 feet) from the project site. As such, the
construction-timing requirements of the City's Noise Ordinance would not apply.
The types of equipment that may be used during construction include a loader, bulldozer, pavers,
trucks, pumps, generators, and other equipment described in Section 1.4. Construction activities are
expected to occur five days per week for 10 hours a day, over the nine-month construction period.
Table 3-8 presents noise levels associated with various types of construction-related equipment,
including those listed above.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-35
smear-&W nJHYfra %pd 712M -
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Table 3-8
Construction Equipment Source Noise Levels
Equipment Type
Typical Equipment at 50 ft. (in dBA)
Quieted Equipment at 50 ft. (in dBA)'
Air Compressor
81
71
Backhoe
85
80
Concrete Pump
82
80
Concrete Vibrator
76
70
Concrete Breaker
82
75
Truck Crane
88
80
Dozer
87
83
Generator
78
71
Loader
84
80
Paver
88
80
Pneumatic Tools
85
75
Water Pump
76
71
Power Hand Saw
78
70
Pile Driver
90
80
Shovel
82
80
Trucks
88
83
Quieted equipment can be designed with enclosures mufflers or other noise-reducing features.
Soave: Bolt, et al. 1971
Table 3-9 shows typical noise levels associated with different stages of construction. Noise levels
would decrease by approximately six dBA with each doubling of distance from the construction site
(e.g., noise levels from excavation would be approximately 83 dBA at 100 feet from the site and
about 77 dBA at 200 feet from the site). Interior noise levels would be approximately 10 dBA (open
windows) to 20 dBA (closed windows) less than exterior noise levels (Cornett, et. al. 1979).
Table 3-9
Typical Construction Noise Levels
Construction Phase
Noise Levels WBA. L_Y
Ground Clearing
84
Excavation
89
Foundation
78
Erection
85
Finishing.
89
'Avaa noise levels 50 feet from the noisiest source associated with a oven construction phase.
Source: Bolt, eL aL 1971
' The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are residences along the creek to the south, which
are located approximately 1,800 feet from the existing bridge, and a senior citizens center to the
southeast near Sam Hicks Memorial Park, which is located approximately 1,500 feet from the
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
Sai03-fmpn .Mi m1wLwd 744
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
existing bridge. Accordingly, exterior noise levels would not exceed 60 dBA at the nearest
residences. The senior citizens center is located several blocks from the bridge along 6' Street.
Noise generated by construction activities at the bridge would not be audible at the senior citizens
center due to the distance of separation and the numerous structures that serve as barriers between
the two locations. Assuming that exterior noise levels would not exceed 60 dBA, L.., at the nearest
residences in any given hour, the Ld., which is generally equivalent to CNEL., at the nearest
residences would be less than 65 dBA. As such, impacts to sensitive receptors would be less than
significant.
b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration orgroundborne noise
levels?
Less Than Significant Impact. Groundborne noise and vibration may be noticeable during major
foundation work but are not expected to be at significant levels that would disrupt normal activity.
c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
' existing without the project?
Less Than Significant Impact. Roadway noise would not significantly change as a result of the
project. The addition of multiple lanes would increase the capacity of the bridge to handle more cars
at any given time; however, traffic flow would be improved on and around the bridge, resulting in
shorter cuing and stacking times. Noise impacts at the business park on the northwest comer of the
bridge would not be significant, as the northern portion of the widened bridge would be occupied
by a wide shoulder and bicycle lane. For these reasons, long-terns noise generated by the project
:would not be significant.
d. A substantial temporary orperiodic increase in ambient noise levels in theproject vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed under 3.11(a), noise impacts would not exceed
thresholds identified in the City of Temecula General Plan nor would the project violate the City's
Noise Ordinance. Although construction activities would generate periodic noise during
construction, the increase in noise above ambient levels would not be substantial. Impacts would
be less than significant.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-37
&a 03 4wm -Mh(3ofi vd 712M
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. There are no airports located within two miles of the site, nor is the project located
within airport land use plan boundaries; therefore, impacts regarding airport noise would not result.
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. The project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip; therefore, impacts
regarding airport-related noise would not result.
3.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
' homes and business) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads. or other
infrastructure)?
No Impact. The widening of the Rancho California Road bridge would not directly or indirectly
induce population growth in the area. Although the project would improve access to the west side
of Murrieta Creek from Interstate 15 and Old Town Temecula, this would not alter growth patterns
or population projections in the area. Residential development consistent with the Old Town
Specific Plan Area' W ' and Specific Plan would continue in the project vicinity regardless of the
project.
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
No Impact. The project would not displace any homes; therefore, impacts would not occur.
c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
' No Impact. The project would not displace any homes; therefore, impacts would not occur.
Page 3-38 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
SMW-hv~-Mft~wd MM
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
3.13 PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction ofwhich could causesignifzcantenvironmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives
for any of the public services:
• Fire protection?
Police protection?
• Schools?
• Parks?
• Other public facilities?
No Impact. The project would have a long-term beneficial impact on public services, in that it
would improve access between the west and east sides of Murrieta Creek near Old Town Temecula.
' This would improve emergency response times and any other public services that rely on vehicular
access to and from opposite sides of the creek. The project would have no discernable effect on
schools or parks aside from improved public access.
3.14 RECREATION
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or
be accelerated?
No Impact. The bridge widening project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities. The project would improve the travel time to parks
on the both sides of the creek (e.g., Rotary Park on the west side of the creek just south of the bridge)
due to improved traffic circulation; however, adverse impacts to recreation facilities would not
occur.
b, Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
' No Impact. The project does not include recreational facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities; therefore, impacts would not occur.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MM Page 3-39
SW03-lmpac+MMx~ npd MZW
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
3.15 TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC - Would the project:
a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and
capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle
trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
Less Than Significant Impact. The bridge widening project would not cause an increase in traffic
which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. The
project would result in minimal disturbance to the existing roadway network during construction.
No detours would be required and lane closures would be brief and infrequent. The addition of three
lanes to the bridge would help reduce the "bottle neck" effect along Rancho California Road between
Front Street and I-15, and would improve overall traffic flow north of the Old Town area. The
project would not substantially increase the total number of cars that cross the Rancho California
Road bridge; rather, the project would improve traffic circulation patterns in the vicinity of the
bridge and allow for more efficient traffic flow.
b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county
' congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
No Impact. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is the congestion
management agency for Riverside County. The RCTC is responsible for implementing the Riverside
County Congestion Management Program (CMP) which was adopted in September 1991. As
mentioned in 3.15(a), the project would reduce the "bottle neck" effect along Rancho California
Road between Front Street and I-15 and improve overall traffic flow north of the Old Town area.
Accordingly, the project would not significantly increase traffic demand at any intersections nor
would it cause a significant increase in the volume to capacity (VIC) ratio on a freeway segment or
freeway on- or off-ramp. Because the project would generate fewer than 50 peak-hour trips during
construction, short-term impacts to CUP monitoring stations are not anticipated.
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a
change in location that results in substantial safety risks?
No Impact. The project would have no effect on air traffic patterns.
Page 3-40 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
5W03-bVn -XW,."wpd 711112
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
d. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves ordangerous intersections)
or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
No Impact. The project would improve vehicular access in the vicinity of the Rancho California
Road bridge. In order to accommodate the widened bridge, a traffic signal would be removed and
a new driveway would be constructed at the commercial site near the southwest side of the bridge
(28751 Rancho California Road). In addition, a new driveway would be constructed to provide
improved access to the business park on the northwest side of the bridge. The widening of the bridge
and the associated roadway improvements would not increase hazards to a design feature or result
in incompatible uses.
e. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Less Than Significant Impact. No detours would occur during the bridge widening activities.
Temporary lane closures may occur as a result of the proposed street improvements east of the
bridge; however, these impacts would be short-term and would not significantly affect emergency
access. Overall, the project would improve access between the west and east sides of Munieta Creek
near Old Town Temecula. The improved access to and from opposite sides of the creek would
benefit all forms of vehicle travel in the area, including emergency-related vehicles. Accordingly,
the project would not result in inadequate emergency access.
f. Result in inadequate parking capacity?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section 1.2 (Description of project), staging of
construction equipmenvwould occur only on previously cleared, graded, or paved areas (including
streets) or level areas where grading and vegetation removal are not required. Although some street
parking may be temporarily displaced by equipment staging and construction worker's vehicles
during the nine-motith construction period, impacts would be less than significant. Most
construction staging would be expected to occur off of the City streets in open areas, such as the
large open lot just north of the bridge along the west side of Diaz Road.
g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation
(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
' No Impact. During construction, a temporary sidewalk would be maintained along the south side
of the bridge to allow continued pedestrian and bicycle access across Murrieta Creek via Rancho
California Road. Upon completion of the bridge widening project, the sidewalk would be
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-41
SM03-1NF"-Uftadvm%pd 7122M
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
reconstructed on the north side of the bridge. The project would not conflict with adopted policies,
plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation.
3.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project:
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
No Impact. No wastewater generation would occur as a result of the bridge widening project;
therefore, the project would have no effect on wastewater treatment requirements.
b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
No Impact. The project would not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities. As such, impacts related to wastewater treatment facilities would not occur.
c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
No Impact. The widening of the Rancho California Road bridge would result in a minor increase
in impervious surface area. Two existing storms drains on the east side of the bridge would be
replaced and a new drain would be constructed on the southwest side of the widened bridge. These
storm drains would replace existing drainage features and would accommodate the minor increase
in runoff from the new bridge deck. The construction of the new facilities would not cause
significant environmental effects. Mitigation measures are provided in Section 3.4 to address
temporary and permanent impacts to biological resources from the project.
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
No Impact. The bridge widening project would not require water supplies; therefore, impacts would
not occur.
Page 342 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
Se 03-lmpxu-XWSadom%pd 7/2M
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
No Impact. The project would not generate any wastewater.
f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste disposal needs?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project would generate a minimal amount of solid waste during
construction. Any debris or refuse resulting from bridge widening activities would be recycled or
disposed of at nearby landfills.
g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less Than Significant Impact. The bridge widening project would comply with all federal, state,
and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The project would not generate substantial
' quantities of waste nor would it involve the disposal of hazardous materials. Waste generated by the
project would be limited to typical construction debris, including the outer portions of the bridge
removed during construction (guardrail, etc.). This debris would be recycled or properly disposed
of at nearby landfills.
3.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less Than Significant After Mitigation. The bridge widening project would not degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. As
' discussed in Section 3.4, Biological Resources, mitigation measures are provided to reduce impacts
to wetlands and riparian plant communities. The project would not eliminate important examples
of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 3-43
3.0 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects.)
Less Than Significant Impact. The project would not result in significant cumulative impacts. The
bridge widening project was designed as not to conflict with the ACOE and RCFC&WCD's
Murrieta Creek Flood Control Project. To accommodate the proposed flood control project, the
bridge supports and abutments were placed outside of the proposed unmaintained vegetated corridor
and the existing freeboard clearance of the bridge was maintained. In addition, other projects in the
area may occur at the same time as the proposed project; however, the incremental effect of this
project would not be cumulatively considerable.
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project would not result in substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly: Mitigation measures are provided in Sections 3.4 and
' 3.9 in order to reduce the project's effects on biological resources and hydrology/water quality,
respectively, below the level of significance. No additional mitigation measures would be required.
F1,
Page 344 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
SWM-LvnriMW, wd 7RMa
4.0 List of Preparers
SECTION 4.0
LIST OF PREPARERS
This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared by EDAW, Inc. for the City of
Temecula. Document preparation personnel included:
• Eric Wilson, Project Manager
• Madonna Marcelo, Environmental Specialist
• Jennifer Dean, Environmental Analyst
• Kimberlee Myers, Environmental Analyst
• Kim Lanford, Biological Resources
• Kevin Derby, Biological Resources
• . Paula Jacks, Biological Resources
' Kristin Kaiser, Quality Assurance(Quality Control
• Terry McLeese, Quality Assurance(Quality Control
• Eric Coughlin, Geographic Information Systems
• Dan Brady, Graphics
• Monica Diaz, Word Processing
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 4-1
0"59Laxa-rtn•JY. .pd rnsm
4.0 List of Preparers
L
This page left intentionally blank.
Page 4-2 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
V"SA%ON-~qrP%~Ypd 7/1"2
5.0 References
' SECTION 5.0
REFERENCES
Bolt, Beranek, and Newman
1971 NoisefromConstruction Equipment andOperations, BuildingEquipment,andHome
Appliances, U.S. Protection Agency.
California Air Resources Board
1998 URBEMIS7G (Version 3.1). Prepared for the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air
Pollution Control District, 1999 Tuolumne Street, Fresno, CA 93271. Prepared by
Jones & Stokes Associates, 2600 V Street, Suite 100, Sacramento, CA 95818.
California Department of Conservation
1998 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program ftp site. Riverside County 1998
farmland inventory, ArcView shape file. Ftp://Rp.conserv.ca.gov/Pub/finmp/
1998/ESRI_ArcShape/riversidel998.shp.
' California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology
1997 Special Publication 42, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California.
1996 Open File Report 96-01N, Los Angeles Quadrangle.
California Integrated Waste Management Board
2000 http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/SWIS/SWISSrch.htin
Comett, C. Lawrence and Hina, Charles E.
1979 Methods for Predicting Noise and Vibration Impacts, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Transportation Systems Center.
Dudek, Inc.
1993 Delineation of Wetlands of the Murrieta Creekflood Control Project Riverside
County, California. Sept. 18, 30pp.
South Coast Air Quality Management District
1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook April.
Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND Page 5-1
0"580U05-Re/..%pd 7117101 -
5.0 References
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
2000 Murrieta Creek Flood Control Project Final EIS/EIR. September.
Page 5-2 Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project IS/MND
OMMLI¢ 05-R¢oerc vd 7117N2
APPENDIX A
SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PARTIAL)
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BRIDGE WIDENING PROJECT
1-1
A Site Assessment Report was prepared for the Rancho
California Road Bridge Widening Project in compliance with
ASTM standards. Only those portions of the Site Assessment
Report pertaining to the immediate project area are included
in the following appendix.
11
I
I
I
H
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Ve n2.7 Pagelr
i
f]
yr,= ,rytr..
0
1
-
2
1
10
7
4C mow.. 'yc~l.Y' Jp C
-3 Y (~yY ^tif ~ ~K fA _ l y "1
T~S..:t. a'~r~isj'2Y.'7, ]Y I :[~a-G.Si~ ~.L~ l~' ~b~~ A L'y.L.{B.Z•~. 'V Ch.Y'.n _
?G
2 _
20 .
'w. .,,.4rt ss^' 4 r ~ _ pc'_ r r r'xapc r r''I~^..~'i.
2 k
i
~
a
NMI
a
'
NOTES
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
- Vmron 2.7 Page 12
I•
r;
r
ell
~
a
a
:
j
'4
~i
y L
JI ,v 1
'
tie
f
1
,
J
~ O
il 6
V
f
t n
44
ab .
d
i R
l,'p
Wa,
:
l r J
~
y
X G
,
c
21
~ o
1
J
y
t
t
~
g
.
R rCp
3
d
~o
O
0.4 0.8
yp
R'
GJS lqy
C
o•• a
Miles
Category:
A
B
C
D
Subject Site
Databases Searched to:
1 1/2 mi.
1 mi.
3/4 mi.
5/8 mi.
Single Sites
Multiple Sites
♦
■
Highways and Major Roads
NPL SPL,
CERCLIS\
UST
ERNS,
U\
Roads
CORRACTS
NFRAP,
GENERATORS
Railroads
(TSD)
TSD, LUST,
Rivers or Water Bodies
a
adcW al databases am S d h,F,6aSwmr
page
displayed
Ca are a~w
a
`
Utilities
w Oft map. The map syn W used cmespor
category War &B. 0.6,C,D.
t
database
War
For More Information Call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report January 17, 2001
Page #3
Page"
I'
.p"v
T
a 4ywf' '4 ] I C
~K J
ti
e
J ,.r '
~
ai
r
fi rA
~ r_
r
~
~
♦ N r
x
.
a
~
p' a
~ ` sr
az ~
_
r
>v
'7 `
X72
~ _
l
( ~
~
>
>
~ q
.p
S s A
❑
~ ~ ns. w, i„
..f..r_. a: tt a
o
tt
;y
0
-0.4 02
a%e
Miles
.
U\
Highways and Major Roads
Subject Site
Roads
Railroads
Rivers or Water Bodies
.
utilities
For More Information Call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 8W- 767 - 0403
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Page #5
u
CERTMED AUTO 5241079
1
43094 VIA DOS PICOS STE A oo2M
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
TEMECULA DIESEL 4866228
1
43216 VIA DOS PICOS STE B O06
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590.
AUTO CARE EXPERTS 3192499
2
43214 BLACKDEER LOOP STE 101 a0-' 11
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
AGRISPECT INC 3595839
3
43124 RANCO WY 0.13M
X
TEMECULA CA 92593
US BORDER PATROL INS 653213
3
43136 RANCHO WAY a13M
X
TEMECULA. CA 92590
I N S BUILDING 4039716
3
43136 RANCHO 0. 13M
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
RANCHO TRANSMISSION 5264361
4
8733 VIA MONTEZUMA UNIT G 014"
2
X
.
TEMECULA, CA 92590
SUPERIOR AUTO REPAIR 4866664
4
28733 VIA MONTEZUMA UNIT C 014"
X
TEMECULA. CA 92590
-RANCHO TEMECULA AUTO PAINTING 346691
4
28696 VIA MONTEZUMA #103 017
X
N
TEMECULA, CA 92590
BIANCHI INTERNATIONAL INC 5603793
5
100 CALLE CORTEZ 017"
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
BIANCHI INTERNATIONAL IN 7429a18
5
100 CALLE CORTEZ o.17M
X
TEMECULA, CA 923900000
BIANCHI INTERNATIONAL 47079
5
100 CALLE CORTEZ 0.17M
I
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
N X = search criteria; • = tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
uervb1,2.7 _ page16
11
I
UNKNOWN 8562384
6A
28690 LAS HACIENDAS a 17
X
N
TEMECULA, CA 92590
BORG WARNER CORP 54295
6B
27942 FRONT ST 028
X
X
X
X
N£
TEMECULA, CA 92590
DUNCANS QUALITY CLNRS 1266606
7
27911 FRONT ST a25
X
N
TEMECULA, CA 92590
ATI (ARAM TOR, INC) 30300
7
27901 FRONT ST a.25
X
N
TEMECULA, CA 92590
AHAM TOR INC 4027263
7
27901 FRONT 0.15"
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
BORG WARNER MECHANICAL SEAL 64996624
8A
27941 FRONT ST 0.28
X'
TEMECULA, CA 92590
PICHEL INDUSTRIES INC 329616
8B
28007 FRONT ST 0.29M
X
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE SUPPLY 4024256
9
28074 DEL RIO
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
USGS WATER WELL ID #3330421170953W~ 79
10
CA
X
SUMMIT ENERGY CORP 64500693
11
28111 FRONT ST 0.34M
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
FRENCHYS AUTO CENTER 3195669
11
28093 FRONT ST 0.37
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
USGS WATER WELL ID #33304911709471V
W1
12A
CA
X
USGS WATER WELL ID #33305011709490994
12A
CA a42e4
X
RANCHO CALIFORNIA AUTO COLUSM480
126
27535 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE WEST a48n4
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
MOBIL 1sa4661
13
28111 FRONT ST 0.40E
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
NARIN OIL CO 5354657
13
28111 FRONT 0.40"
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
N X = search criteria; • =
For more information c
Report ID: 899001901
Yation 2.7
Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Page f7
DELTA DISCOUNT GAS 6960629
13
28111 FRONT ST O4OiN
X
TEM............MECULA CA 92590
TEMECULA VALLEY IMAGING CTR 4866482
14
27699 JEFFERSON AVE UNIT 110 O41M
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
ECONO LUBE N'TUNE 5181 4499878
14
27685 JEFFERSON a42 m
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
OPTO 22 INC 1600703
15
43044 BUSINESS PARK DR 0'44
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
CRYOQUIP INC 1268411
15
43085 BUSINESS PARK DR UNIT A 0.44
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
PROFESSIONAL HOSPITAL SUPPLY 2128582
16
43225 BUSINESS PARK DR. 0.45M
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
MEDICAL DESIGN CONCEPTS 486606
16
43225 BUSINESS PARK DR. a45M
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
USGS WATER WELL ID 533305611709382
17A
CA aw"
X
CHEVRON STATION 9 9917 3767215
17B
27560JEFFERSON 057
X
X
X
TEMECULA CA 92591
JEFFERSON STREET CHEVRON 65490128
17B
27560 JEFFERSON AVE a57M
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
USGS WATER WELL ID 5333102117093911
17C
,CA
X
SOLID STATE STAMPING INC. 3193156
18
43350 BUSINESS PARK DR. 0.52
X
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590 .
MEDICAL DESIGN CONCEPT 4020945
18
43225 BUSINESS PARK 0.55M
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
SKS INC 10789443
19
41981 AVENIDA ALVARADO 0.53
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
TEMECULA FUEL CENTER 4019202
19
41981 AVENIDO ALVARADO os4ti4
X
TEMECULA, CA 92390
AM PM MINI MARKET 5472 6962048
20A
27691 YNEZ RD a57M
X
TEMECULA, CA 92591
X = search criteria; • = tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Yenbn 2.7 Page f8
INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER HEXFET 651544
22
41915 BUSINESS PK DR 0.63
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER HEXFET 193913
AMERICA am
22
41915 BUSINESS PARK DR.
X
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
INTL RECTIFIER CORP .3193750
22
41915 BUSINESS PARK ¢63
X
TEMECULA CA 92690
USGS WATER WELL ID #333103117094fWI4
23
CA 0.63"
1
X
HONDA OF TEMECULA 199145
23
27500 JEFFERSON RD 0.66
X
X
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
HONDA OF TEMECULA• 65402OW
23
27500 JEFFERSON AVE a66nr
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
UNOCAL STA 16519 1176901
24
28903 RANCHO CALF RD 0.65"
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
UNOCAL 9591796
24
28903 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 0.66
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
UNOCAL #6519 3776296
24
28903 RANCHO CALIF ¢ss
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
TEMECULA 76 6519 64501663
24
28903 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD am
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
X = search criteria; • = tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Verson 2.7 Page n
E,
UNOCAL SERVICE STATION #6 703406
24
28903 RANCHO CALIFORNIA 0.66
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
CHEVRON STATION 91870 115430
24
28900 RANCHO CALIF RD 0.67M
X
X
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
CHEVRON #9-1870 62426029
24
28900 RANCHO CALIF RD 067M
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
USGS WATER WELL ID #333032117085SK961
25
CA a67 E
X
GTE RANCHO CALIFORNIA C O 0034690
26A
41963 MORENO 073
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
SAMS SUPER SHELL 66015911
27
28676 FRONT ST 0'73
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
FORMER MOBIL 65002226
27
28677 FRONT ST 0.74M
#
h
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
USGS WATER WELL ID#333020117084gW94s
28A
CA
- L
.
1
.
I
I
X
I
.
.
I
X = search criteria; • = tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Yerslon 2.7 - Pagefl0
F
USGS WATER WELL ID 03330151170844AL6935
30
CA a88"i
7(
USGS WATER WELL ID #3330141170839W93
30
,CA
X
USGS WATER WELL ID #33303211108391*
31
,CA
X
USGS WATER WELL ID #3330301170834W.956
31
,CA
X
W34
USGS WATER WELL ID #3331171170945
32
0
CA
X
USGS WATER WELL ID #3331181170944W036
32
CA
X
N
LANDFILL,LAMB CANYON 7435073
32
HWY 79 WINCHESTER ROAD 098
X
BEAUMONT CA
USGS WATER WELL ID #333121117094A
r
32
O
CA
.
X
USGS WATER WELL ID #332939117091370
33
, CA aw"
X
USGS WATER WELL ID #3329391170911%
0"9
33
0
CA
X
USGS WATER WELL ID #332938117091EW861
33
CA a97
X
USGS WATER WELL ID #3329381170911
33
0
CA
X
5
USGS WATER WELL ID #3329381170905 K859
33
CA
X
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 4824346
34
27685 COMMERCE CENTER 097"
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 65402540
34
27685 COMMERCE CTR DR #A 0.97
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
USGS WATER WELL ID #3 3 2 9 4 511 7 08 5 5045892
35
, CA 0.99"
X
891
USGS WATER WELL ID #332944117085I
35
W
CA
X
X = search criteria; + - to along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Version 27 Page /l7
WMPAO X = search criteria; • = tagalong (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Version 2.7 Page /12
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL MFG 18225
28780 SINGLE OAK DR
X
TEMECULA, CA 92590
NORTH JEFFERSON BUS PARK 6563866
JEFFERSON AVE
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
ZEVO GOLF 7033202
42000 ZEVO DR
X
TEMECULA CA 92590
BUTTERFIELD COUNTRY 65402534
38000 HWY 79
X
TEMECULA, CA0
TEMECULA 65506266
RAINBOW CANYON RD T8S R2W
X
TEMECULA, CA 0
TEMECULA 7447420
EAST OF HWY 15
X
TEMECULA, CA
WOLF CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - PROPOSW
BETWEEN LOMA LINDA RD WOLF VALLEY ROAD
X
TEMECULA, CA 92592
WOLF CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL - PROPOSED5151750
S CORNER LOMA LINDA RD VIA DEL CORANAD
X
TEMECULA, CA 92592
WOLF CREEK HIGH SCHOOL - PROPOSED 65151751
N CORNER PALA AND PROPOSED FAIRVIEW
ROAD
X
TEMECULA. CA 92592
RANCHO VISTA ROAD SCH SITE - PROPOSE9151759
RANCHO VISTA ROAD PAUBLA ROAD
X
TEMECULA, CA 92591
GTE TEMECULA 65108459
41611 REAGAN AVE
X
MURRIETA CA 92562
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED REDHAW08444
CENT
32505 S HWY 79
X
TEMECULA, CA 92592
CIRCLE K 65107908
41010 CALIFORNIA OAKS RD
X
MURRIETA, CA 92561
GTE MURRIETA PLANT YARD 65au8984
32477 HUAN RD
X
MURRIETA, CA 0
X - search criteria; • =
For more information c
Report ID: 899001901
Version 27
search criteria).
Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 600 - 767 - 0403.
Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Page fl3
Agency Address:
EPA Region:
Significant Non-Complier Indicator.
RCRA Faclty Classification(s):
Notification Type:
Contact-
Phone:
Owner/Operator Indicator.
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Operator Name:
Phone:
Generator Indicator.
Transporter Indicator.
Indicator.
Indicator:
Generator Status:
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency for this Site:
09
NANDLERIsNOTA37GNIFIcANFNON-COMPLIERATMGINNINGOFFWAL YEAR.
HANDLER IS NOT A MEMBER OFTNESUBLECT rO C0RRECRVEACn0N UNIVERSE
NORFICARONDAM - CORE
JOSEPH .
PREUSSEL
(909) 695-6760 -
CVRRENTOWNER
PZVA7E
DOS PICOS BUSINESS PARK
(909) 699-0996
SMALL QUAN71TYGENERATOR
UNVERIRED
NOFA ISD, UNVWFIED
UNVENNRED
RCRA REGULATED
Sra" Dwmpdon(7), ISO States Desc ooon(T), Bw lglenderSratm
Desa(prion(r). Tmnwp twkat S(I), TSOstatm(1), Buner/WWn stats(1). ITsed
• VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
7v Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Vasbn 27 PageAF1
/rI
Significant Non-Complier Indicator.
RCRA Fadity Classification(s):
Notification Type:
Contact,
Phone:
Owner/Operator Indicator-
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Operator Name:
Phone:
Generator Indicator.
II4ND[ERISNOTA.9GNIRCANTNON-COMPUERATB£G1NNlNGOFFCCAC YEAR
HANDIER IS NOT A MEMBER OFTHE SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACRON UNIVERSE.
NOUFICARONDATA-CORE
JOANIE
WHIFF
(91091676-8"
CURRENT OWNER
POVAIE
KENN07H000K-ER
(909) 676-8009
SMALL QIJANBTYGENERATOR
(Transporter Indicator.
Indicator.
UNVERIFIED
NOTA W,, UNVERFIED
UNVERFIED
RCRA REGU[AIED
rt Reported by the Source
for this Site:
ncy Address: AUTOCAREEXPERIS
43214SLACKDEERLOOPSTE 101
IEMECUL , CA 92390
Region: 09
Ificant Non-Complier Indicator.
HANDIERISNO%ASIGNIfICANTNON-COMPLIER ATB£GINN1NGOffISCAL YEAR
RCRA Facifty Classification(s):
Notification Type:
Contact:
Phone:
Owner/Operator Indicator.
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Operator Name:
Phone:
Owner/Operator Indicator.
N• VISTA address Includes
HANDIERISNOTA MEMBER OFINESUBJECTTO CORRECIIVEACRON UNIVERSE
NOnf7CARONDAIA-CORE
GROSS
MIKE
(774) 694-0017
CUIMENTOWNER
PNVAIE
MIKE GROSS
(415) 555-1212
CUIMENTOPERATOR
For more information call
Report ID: 899001901
Version 2.7
city and ZIP.
rmatlon Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Page l15
Owner/Operator Type:
PRME
Owner/Operator Name:
NOTREQUIRED
Phone:
(415) 555-1212
SIC Code:
7538
SIC Code Source:
REPORIEDBYFAC/U/Y
Generator Indicator
SMALL QUANTAYG£N£RATOR
Transporter Indicator:
UNVENRED
TSD Indicator.
NOTA TSD, UAWNRED _
Burner/Blender Indicator.
UNVER'HED
Generator Status:
RCRA REGULATED
Fields Not Reported by the Source
0b'W rMruParat/on #x*Cata-(1). Gawnn Mato Desaiptlon(1). Transpoaa-
Agency for this Site:
Shat Daxdp0on(1). TSDSraaa De po'on(1), Buse 1811 ed Statw
Desaiptlon(1). Transport-Statw(1). T5OSYa"(1), 8r /BWOn tsar (1). Used
01 aRCRA Reqdatoty Sratw 1
Agency Address:
S4MEASABOVE
EPA Region:
08
Significant Non-Complier Indicator.
NAND[ERISNOTASYGNIFIGNTNON-COMPL/fRATB£GINN/NGOFFYSG4C Y£AQ
RCRA Ferilry Classification(s):
H4NOLERISN0TAMEM8ER OF7HESUe/£CTTOcojwcn EACAONUN/VERSE
Notification Type:
NOAFICAAONDAM -CORE
Contact.:
VAEY
RICHARD
Phone:
(714)676.4308 _
Owner/Operator Indicator.
CURRENTOWNER
Owner/Operator Type:
MME
Owner/Operator Name:
ROBERTR'CHARDSON
Phone:
,(415)555-1212
Owner/Operator Indicator:
CURRENTOPERATOR
Owner/Operator Type:
AWAT
Owner/Operator Name:
NOTREQUIRED
Phone:
(415) 555-1212
SIC Code:
8748
SIC Code Source:
REPOMEDBYFACQ)TY
Generator Indicator.
SMMU QUANAIYGENERATOR -
N• VISTA address Includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Yerdon 27 Pagetw
Indicator.
Indicator.
Indicator.
'ator Status:
Not Reported by the Source
W for this Site:
UNVEWRED
NOIA ISD. UNVERINED
UNVE(MF/ED
RCR4 REGULAIED
OMw Rampofta6`on an
Status Descn',odon(11. >S
Generator Status Dp ptlon(11. Iramporter
esnlp wo), Boat Iw--v Wstatus
F), ISDSratw(1), e.na/&ende smaa(11. Used
`te`n=;~'r~•..m °~~T:'`;::..~.._
m
m's~~
Agency Address:
USBOROERPARX#/NS
43136 RANCHO WAY
-
1EMECULA CA
Facility ID:
95544.07
Remediation Status:
CZOSEDIACRON COMPIEIED
Media Affected:
SOIL ONLYISMPAC1ED
Description / Comment:
0
"a
~
~
4
Y
Y~
lS.'9# ~T~
YY
tt~
Y't
.
,
'J
•
3
~
'
N 9
y
~
~..i
.q
r.-...r..
Agency Address:
US BORDER PATROL INS
- -
43136R4NCHOWAY
IEMECULA CA 0
Site Name: -
USBORDERPAMOUNS
Address:
43136 RANCHO WAY
City:
1EMECULA
County:
NVOWDE
State:
CA
Case No:
9(/13083
Zip:
92390
Stop Date:
61111995
-
Status Desc:
CASECLOSED
Sub Desc:
GASOLINE
Case Type Desc:
501. ONLY,
Lead Agency Desc:
LOCAL AGENCY(COUNrO
Local Agency Desc:
)MRSIDE
Program Desc:
LOCAL OVDMGHI PROGRAM U$r
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Xsdeet(1), Substax Ory(l), Date 1(1), Oate3a(1) Date5c(1), DateSr(11, Date7(1).
Agency for this Site:
DatWl), Ax ay(1), Enforcement Iype(1), ErtfofcementDate(11, Wdmum(1),
N esrwm 1, RL Desc 1
WMAWV
{
MWNK
Agency Address:
USBORDERPAMOL /NS
43136 RANCHO WAY
1EMECULA CA 92390
Site Name:
US BORDER PAIROI INS
N• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Vetsan27 Paged]
Street Number.
43136
Street Name:
RANCHO WAY
City:
TEMECULA
Zip:
92390
Region:
09
County:
33
Case Number.
9Ur3083
Case Type:
SO&
Lead Agency:
LOCACAGENCY
Status:
CAS£CCOSED
Substance:
GASOLINE
Abatement Method:
EXG9 VAIEANOOLSPOSE
Enforcement Type:
AGENCYCODE0
Funding:
"
RL
SPONS/BLEPAR(Y
How LUST was Discovered:
TANK aowRE
How LUST was Stopped:
CLOSETANK
Program:
COC,4L OVERS/GHTPROGRAM U57
Leak Cause:
UNKNOWN
Leak Source:
UNKNOWN
Report Date:
7/10/1994
Review Date:
81311995
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Cr Street(l), County Code(). Cleanup fund /D(1). So8Qua6fiet(1). M78ETn
Agency for this Site:
So9(1). GrowldwatwQuaf6er(1), MIBEk1 croundwater(I), Operara(1). ,
Progr (1),PdoW(1),Qu tyofftnaySubstanceteaked(G)(1),
Suspw0ed(1), Lauhrde(1) LorgiWe(t). S-May(1), Date teak Oarf"od(1),
Date Pta(m S(teAssesswmt Wakplan.Sub(1), Date Poludon Characted7adon
Began(1), Date Remed/atbn Plan S bm&ed(1), Cate RemedialAcdon
Undetway(r), Date Past Rmm d/alAcdon MorYtodng Beg(1), Date offn(orcement
- Acdon , MMEDate 1
Agency Address:
/NSeuaDING
43136 RANCHO
IEMEMIA, CA 923910
Underground Tanks:
2
Aboveground Tanks:
NOTREPORIED
Tanks Removed:
NOTR£PORTED
• VISTA address Includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 600 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 699001901 Date of Report January 17,2001
ge.41
Version 2.7 Pagefl8
ncy Address:
S4MEASABOVE
Region:
09
ificant Non-Complier Indicator
HAND[ERISNOTASIGNIfICANTNON-COMPU£RATBEGINN/NGOFf/SCAC YEAR
A Facilty Classification(s):
HANDLERISNOTA MEMBER OFTHESUBJECTTO CORRECRVEACRON UNIVERSE.
fication Type:
N077FICA17ONDATA-CORE
tact:
_ EFRAIN
SELVA JR
fie:
(909)676-6569
ler/Operator Indicator:
CURRENT OWNER
rer/Operator Type:
PffVAIE
rer/Operator Name:
DONCOOP
fre:
(909)676-1638
SMALL QUANRTYGENERATOR
Indicator.
UNVEPoFIED
0
TSD Indicator.
NOTA TSD, UNVER/FIED
Bumer/Blender Indicator.
UP&MAED
Generator Status:
RCRA REGUL41ED
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency for Us Site:
.
Offal mpcrtabon/nd/oator(1). Genetatw5WWDesaipUon(I), Transporter
Statw Descriptlon(I). TSOStaas Descd M(1). &u /Rle da-Staes
Desolp6on(T), TramponerStaas(1), TSD StatU Burxr78lendwStat rs()) Used
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
EPA Region: 09
Significant Non-Complier Indicator: HANDLER ISNOTASIGN1F1CANTNON-COMPUERATB£GINNINGOF FISCAL YEAR
Facilty Classification(s):
HANDLERIS.NOTA MEMBER OFRIESUB/£CT rO CORRECRVEACRON UNNERSE.
:ation Type:
NORFICARONDAM - CORE
ct:
SANITAGO
BENREZ
_
(909)699-6077
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 787 - 0403.
7v Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Va Ion 27 Page/19
Owner/Operator Indicator.
Owner/Operator Type.
Owner/Operator Name:
Phone:
Generator Indicator.
Indicator.
Indicator.
Indicator.
Not Reported by the Source
:y for this Site:
Address:
EPA Region:
Significant Non-Complier Indicator.
RCRA FaciRy Classification(s):
Notification Type-
Contact,
Indicator.
Type:
Indicator.
Name:
SIC Code Source:
Generator Indicator.
CURRENT OWNER .
PRIVATE
DONALD W COOP
(9109) 676-3301
SMALL QUANRrYG£N£RATOR
UNVERIFIED
NOTA 15D. UNVERIFIED
UNV£R/N£D
RCRA REGULATED
Used
28696 VIA MONTEWMA 1103
TEMECULA CA 92390
09
NANDURISNOTASIGNIFLCANTNON-COMPUERATBEGINNINGOFFLSCAL YEAR
NANOIER6NOTA MEMBER OFIIESURIECT TO CORRECIIVEACIION UNIVERSE
NORNCARONDATA -COME
-
ENWRONMENTAL
MANAGER
(714) 699-4099
CURREMOWNER
PNVArE
SCOTTBASSED? .
(415) 555-1212
CURRENTOPERATOR
PRIVATE
NorREautRED
(415) 555-1212
7532
REPORTEDBYFACBIIY -
SMALL QUANRTYGENERATOR
• VISTA address Includes enhanced. city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Verson 2.7 Page 120
Transporter Indicator.
UNVERRED
TSD Indicator.
NOTA 1SD, UNVEmnED
Bumer/Blender Indicator.
UNVEISFIED
Generator Status:
RCRA REGULATED
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Othe 8atspatation IndTcator(1). Ge tor&atus Desaptlon(1), Tmnsporter
Agency for this Site:
stance D-poon(1), Tsostaws Desaipnon(1), &m 181enderSratm
Desa42tion(1)• TrampoiWStaaa(1), TSDStams(1), BtmeIRWWetstatus(1) Used
QTR RCRAR a Status 1
Agency Address:
BIANCI 1NTERNAnONAL INC
100 CALLECORIEZ
TEMECULA, CA
Facility ID•
94052.00
Remediation Status:
RDWEDiAL INKS77GAWN PHASE
Media Affected:
AQUIFERCONTAMINA1ED
Description / Comment:
O
ag°~ _ e arm _zr
01
~
•
:.T,T 1~ ry T.
Agency.Address:
&ANCtetNIMWONAL INC
100CALLECORRZ
UMECULA CA 0
Site Name:
&ANCOMERNAnONAL INC
Address:
100GALLECORIEZ
city.
MMECULA
County:
RIVERSIDE _
State:
CA
Case No:
9UT2961
Zip:
92590
Stop Date:
121711991
Status Desc: -
ATWMINARYSREASSESSMENIISUNDERWAY WNCNMAY
Sub Desc:
GASOUNE
Case Type Desc:
AWFERAFFECrED (MUNICIPALUSE)
Lead Agency Desc:
LOCAL AGENCY(COUNIY)
Local Agency Desc:
NVERRVE
P ram Desc:
LOCAL OVERSIGNTPROGRAMUST
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Stl&tance Qty(1), Date1(1), DaWa(1), Date5c(1), Date&(1), DaW(1), DaW(1),
Agency for this Site:
Date9(1), Avrky(1), Abatement Meftd(1), Eltfa rwnet#Type(1). Enforcement
Date(l), Wdmum(1), Npdesnum(1) Fie L1fpOy(1), Abatwwt McUrod Desc(1),
Benetkrat Use Desc 1, 1
3
Agency Address:
BIANCHINIERNAUONAL INC
1000ALLECORTEZ
1EMECULA CA 92590
Site Name:
RANC1111WERNA77ONAL INC
' VISTA address Includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
version Z.7 Page 121
L~JI
Street Number.
100
Street Name:
CALLECORMEZ
City:
T£M£CULA
Zip:
91590
Region:
09
County:
33
Case Number,
9U72951
Case Type:
ACQUIRER
Lead Agency:
LOCALAGENCY
Status:
PREUMINARYSBEASS£SSM£NIUNDERWAY
Substance:
GASOUNE
Abatement Method:
AGENCYCODEO -
Enforcement Type:
AGENCYCODEO
Funding:
RELPONSI%£PARTY
How LUST was Discovered:
TANKCLOSURE
How LUST was Stopped:
CLOSETANK
Program
_ LOCAL OVERS/GMPRO(-RAM UST
Leak Cause:
UNKNOWN
Leak Source:
TANK
Report Date:
112411994
Review Date:
11911995
Fields Not Reported by the Source
COW7ty Code(l). Clea-F&WdlD(1). SolQuafer(I). M1B£mW(1),
Agency for this Site: -
Groundwater Qu Ka(l), MWEIn Gmwdwate(1), ope to (11. Apgam(l),
RfaW). Qu naryofPi ary.wdstax L[ ked(G)(1), Aapended(l).
LabWe(1) LonoWe(l),.SwnmaXl), Date Leak Cots£mied(1) , DatefYerm&te
Azmmart Wa"anSub(1), Date Pollution ChamctetzatlonBegan(1), Date
RemediabonPlan Sub"Wed(1). Dale RemedlalActlon Undew l), Date Pcst
RemedWAcdcn ArorAcmV eeg(1). Date n/e.Ca was Ckwd(1), Date of
&AacemeMActlon 1, MTBEDate 1
N
=Address:
SAMEASABO✓E
!FAKING TANK
9UT2961
N VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
✓esbn 2.7 Page 122
Agency Address:
EPA Region:
Significant Non-CompFier Indicator,
RCRA Facilty Classification(s):
Notification Type:
Contact,
Phone:
Owner/Operator Indicator.
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Operator Name:
Phone:
Owner/Operator Indicator:
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Operator Name:
Phone:
SIC Code:
SIC Code Source:
Generator Indicator.
Transporter Indicator.
TSD Indicator.
BumerBlender Indicator.
Generator Status:
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency for this Site:
Agency Address:
Spill Date:
Spill Location:
100 CALLE CORTEZ
TEMECULA, CA 92390
09
HANDL£RISNOTAAGNIfICANTNON-COMPU£RATBEGLNNINGOFFWAL YEAR
HANDL£RISNOTAMEMBEROFTHESULUECT rOCOIWCRVEACRONUNIVERSE
NORNCARONDAM-COME
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGER
(714) 676-5621
CV02ENTOWN£R
PA'VATE
JOHN DONNA ONNCH
(415) 555-1211
CURRENT OPER410R
PRVAIE
NOTREQUIRED
(415) 555-1211
3199
RLPORrEDBYFACTLRY
SMALL QUANRTYGENERATOR
UNVERINED
NOTA TSD, UNVERIFIED
UNVENRED
RCRA REGULATED
Odw Tmtrportat/on Indr to
Stall Des plTon(1), TSD Stall
eaa Desaotton(1), Trarupatw
B74nerAllendaRahs
7), Birner11MriderStatw(1), Used
JANUARY 17, 1993
28690LASHACIENDAS
FMCIDE
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1- 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Dale of Report: January 17, 2001
.12
Version 27 Pagee 123
Agency Address: SAMEASABOV£
Spill Date: JANUARY 17, 1993
Split Location: 28690 LAS,h4aENLb15
Material Spilled: PEMaDE
Address:
EPA Region:
Significant Non-Complier Indicator.
RCRA Fact ty Classification(s):
Notification Type:
Contact*
Phone:
Owner/Operator Indicator.
Owner/Operator Type:
erator Name:
Indicator.
Indicator.
TSD Indicator.
BumerBlender Indicator.
or Status:
Address:
Region:
fficant Non-Complier Indicator.
27942 FRONFST
TEMECULA CA 92390
09
HANLHERISNOTA SIGNIFICANTNON-COMP[1ERATBEGINNINGOFFISCAL YEAR
HANDIERISNOTA MEMBER OFUESUBJ£CTTO CORR£CTIWACRON UMVERSE.
N017RCAIIONDATA -CORE
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGER
(714) 6765001
CURRENTOWNER .
PRVATE
EUDUBROW
(415) 555-1211
CURREMOPERATOR
PRVA7E
NOT REQUIRED
(415) 555-1211
AMU QUAN717Y GENERA FOR
UNVEId'N£D
NOTA TSD, UNV£RIN£D
UNVMFTED
RCRA REGULATED
27942 FRONT ST
TEMECULA CA 91390
09
HANDERISNOTASIC
YEAR
N• VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001801 Date-of Report: January 17, 2001
Ve n Z7 Page t24
I~
RCRA Faciity Classification(s):
NANOL £R lS NOT A MEMBER OFME SUBJECT TO C0RREC77VE ACAON UNNERSE:
Notification Type:
NOnHCARONDATA -CORE
-
Contact,
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGER
Phone:
(714) 676.5001
Owner/Operator Indicator
CUR7£NTOWNER
Owner/Operator Type:
PNVATE
Owner/Operator Name:
&IDUBROw
Phone:
(415) 555-1212
Owner/Operator Indicator.
cURRENrOPERATOR
Owner/Operator Type:
ProVATE
Owner/Operator Name:
NOIAFOUIRED
Phone:
(415) 555.1212 -
Generator Indicator.
SMALL QUANnTYGENERATOR
Transporter Indicator.
UNVETI/FIED
TSD Indicator.
NOTA TSD, UNVERIFIED
UNVERTH£D
Status: RCRA REGULATED
Agency Address: BORG WARNERSECUOTYCORP
27941 fRONTST
TEM£CUL4 CA 92590
EPA Region: 09
Significant Non-Complier Indicator:
HANDL£RIS NOTA SIGN/F/CANTNON-COMPLIERAre£G1NN/NGOFFTSCAL YEAR
RCRA Faciity Classification(s):
HANDLER IS NOlA MEMBER O£THE SUBJECT !O CORR£CT/VEACnON UNIVERSE.
Notification Type: N0nRCAfl01VDATA -CORE
Contact, NEIL
ROSMAN
Phone: (312) 322-8597
Owner/Operator Indicator: CURRENTOWNER
Owner/Operator Type: PRTVAIE
Owner/Operator Name: BORG WARNER SFCURIrYCORP
Phone: (312) 312-8597
Owner/Operator Indicator CIRTREN7 OPEP410R
Owner/Operator Type: PTSVATE
Owner/Operator Name: NOTREQLARED
Phone: (415) 555.1212
SIC Code: 3443
SIC Code source: RLPORIEDBYFACLLAY
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report- January 17, 2001
Verson 2.7 Page/25
Indicator SMALL QUANRTYGENERATOR
r indicator
UNVERIFIED
Indicator.
NOTA TSD. UNVERINED
rider Indicator.
UNVER/F/ED
Status: RCRA REGULATED
Agency Address:
BORG WARNLRSEGUNTYCORP
27941 FRONFSr
TEMECULA CA 92590
EPA Region:
09
Significant Non-Complier Indicator
N4NOIERISNOTAS/GN/FICANTNON-COMPVERAT[1EG/NN/NF#F6CAL YEAR
RCRA Facility Classification(s):
HANDLER IS NOT A MEMBER Of IHESUBIECT 70 CORRECIIVEACRON UNIVERSE.
Notification Type:
NORFICA17ONDArA-CORE
Contact,
NEC
ROSMAN
Phone:
(312) 322-9597
Owner/Operator Indicator.
CURRENrOWNER
Owner/Operator Type:
P9VAIE
Owner/Operator Name:
BORG WARNERSECUPoTYCORP
Phone:
(311) 322-8597 -
Owner/Operator Indicator.
CURRENrOPERArOR
Owner/Operator Type:
PRIVATE
Owner/Operator Name:
NOTREQUIMS0
Phone:
(415) 555-1212
SIC Code:
3443
SIC Code Source:
ROORIEDBYFACIUff
Generator Indicator.
SMALL QUANflrY GENERA 10R
Transporter Indicator
UNVEIS'NED
TSD Indicator.
NOTA TSD. UNVERFIED
Bumer/Blender Indicator.
UNVERRED
Generator Status:
RCRA REGULATED
Fields Not Reported by the Source
OU>er TranWoitadon /nd/cator(1), Generato SYanu Dasalpbon(4); rranWarrw
Agency for this Site:
Staau(5), IS9 Status(5), umIXwdeStatw(5), rransportwStau(1), 130
Stafus(r), Bun IWende Statw(1), Used ODRecyderRCRA RegulataryStatw(4),
OUte-ftnWatawn Indlcator(1), Odrer TranWatathn Indlcatwo). Trarupaner
Status Dk pton(2). W Status tkscripbm(2). Lli IB/andwStatu
DesoloNon(2). 0dt Aansaartalion Ind/cator(])
7T ' VISTA address includes enhanced city and UP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Velmkm27 Page f26
J
u
I
Agency Address: -
BORG WARNER CORP
-
27942 FROWST
TEMECULA CA 923917
EPA ID:
CAD981376361
Site ID:
0903170
EPA Region:
09
USGS Hydrologic Unit Code:
18070302
Ownership Type:
PRIVATE
Federal Facility Indicator.
NOTA FEDEPAL FACILITY
NPL Status:
NOIONTHENPL
Hazardous Waste Docket flag:
NOT ON llffT/AY4RDOUSWASIEDOCKET
Action:
DISCOVERY
Action Lead:
STATE FUND FINANCED
Scheduled Completion Date:
DEC£MBER31, 1987
Actual Completion Date:
DECEMBER 1, 1967
Action:
PRELIMINARYA.SSESSMENT
Action Qualifier -
NFRAP(NOFU"RREMEDIALACRONPLANNED
Action Lead: -
STATE; FUND FINANCED
Scheduled Completion Date:
MARCH31, 1989
Actual Completion Date:
MARCH 75, 1989
Operable Unit ID:
00
O rable Unit Name:
51AWIDE
Alias ID:
101
Alias Name:
8ORG WAWD?INDUsnak PRODUCT
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Fnan fMamg&YeWSyste 00),5tebecdentCatcgoyDesalpdon(I) ,Acoon
Agency for this Site:
OuaW8 (I), Sdi9dt&d Stmt Date(2), AcdtalStanDate(2), Desrnpdon(1),
Addtecs 1
_
_
-
Agency Address:
BORG WARNERMECNAMCAL SE
27941 FRONT
TEMECULA CA 92390
List Name:
LEAKING TANK
Site ID:
9U7758
MMIM
n .
,
Agency Address:
BORG-WARNERCORPOPABON
27941 FRONT SnWET
TEMECULA CA 92390
Agency ID:
33360037
Facility Name:
BORG-WARNER CONIOR4nON
Facility Address:
27941 FROWSIREET
Facility City:
TEMECULA
Facility State:
CA
Facility lip:
92390
' VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more Information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001907 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Vernion2.7 Page t Z7
Date:
Status Description:
Alternate Address:
Alternate City:
Alternate State:
Alternate Zip:
Alternate Name:
Completion Date:
Gallons Removed:
Completion Date:
Gallons Removed:
Completion Datg:
Gallons Removed:
Completion Date:
Gallons Removed:
Agency ID:
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency Address:
EPA Region:
Significant Non-Complier Indicator.
FaciRy Classification(s):
Type:
Owner/Operator Indicator:
Owner/Operator Type-
Owner/Operator Name:
Owner/Operator Indicator.
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Operator Name:
Phone:
RfVDMDE
05121995
REERW
PROPER1 YME REEERRED TO RWQCB
27941 FROWsnwEr
TEMECULA
CA
92390
BORG-WARNER CORPORA77ON
05121995
0
06301988
0
03121987
O
04251983
0
333601737
NFL(1), rw(t). Fund(1). C.
Date(1). Cround"t&V).
Haz dRanWWSc"O). Ha dRanhV
ICMY(3). Corn e`KDera7Pdon(4)
DUNCANSQUAMCLNRS
27911 FRONTSr
1EMECULA. CA 91390
09
HANDLERLS NOTA SIGMFICANTNON-COMPU£RATBEGINNTNGOFFWAL YEAR.
HANDLER LsNOrA MOL1BER OFTHESUB)ECTTO CORRECRVEACRON UNIVERSE.
N077FI CAT ION DATA - CORE
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGER
(714) 676-7449
CUMENTOWNER
PWVA7E
DUNCANDA14D
(415) 555-1272
CURRENTOPOTATOR
PRVATE
NOT REQUIRED
(415) 555-1212
N VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date Of Report: January 17, 2001
Version 2.7 P9ge128
I Generator Indicator.
SMALL QUANRlYGFNERATOR
Transporter Indicator
UNVERIFIED
TSD Indicator.
NOFA TSO, UNVENHED
BumerBlender Indicator.
UNVEMED
Generator Status:
RCRA REGULATED
Fields Not Reported by the Source
ObW rrampataoon krdi tor(I), Generato Status Desai(Ym(1)• Transporter
Agency for this Site:
Status Desa(p0on(1), W 5tatwDea a p6m(1)• aaner/Blendr Stanrs
'
Deuriplion(1), 6amponwStatrs(1)• TSDStatw(1) BuTrer/Bledder.s
tams(I)• Used
Agency Address: A17(ARAM TOR INC)
17901 FRONrST
RANCHO CAUFORNIA CA 91390
EPA Region: 09
Significant Non-Compfier Indicator.
HANDTERtsNO(A SIGNIFICANTNON-COMPLIERATFEGINMNGOffISCA( YEAR
' RCRA Faciity Classification(s):
HANDLER IS NOTA MEMBER OfTH£ SUBJECT TO CORRECTNEACTTON UNN£RS£.
Notification Type: NORHCARONDATA-CORE
- - Contact: ENVIRONMENTAL .
MANAGER
Phone: (714) 6764151
Owner/Operator Indicator. COWNTOr9NER
Owner/Operator Type: PWATE
Owner/Operator Name:. ARAM TOR INCDR4 (AM
Phone: (415) 555-1111
Owner/Operator Indicator. CUMENTOPERATOR
Owner/Operator Type: PRIVATE
Owner/Operator Name: NOTREQUIRW
Phone: (415) 555-111
Generator Indicator.
LARGE QUAIV77TY GENERATOR
Transporter Indicator. UNWRRED
TSD Indicator.
NOrA TSD, UNVEWED
BumerBlender Indicator.
UNITMR60
Generator Status: RCRAREGULATED
N VISTA address includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Verson 27 Page 129
G
Fields Not Reported by the Source Othwrmnwcrtaobn1nd/Catw(1),Gerta wStatusDesai (I). rrarapwtar j
Agency for this Site: Stan5 Da pwn(1), 75OSta" Dena pdon(1), Bu Idle Wd stance
Desaip9 (1). rmn pWt Statta(1) TSDStatus(1), &mer/Bt&Wff tatut(1), Used
OffRecvderRCRA Re WatayStahn(1) Evaluation CoveraOeAtea(1)
Agency Address:
SAMEASABOVE
Underground Tanks:
I
Aboveground Tanks:
NOTREPORIED
Tanks Removed:
NOTAFFORIED
z"P
s
a+
f
Agency Address:
BORG WARNER MECHANICAL SEAL :
27941 FROM Sr
TEMECUL4 GAO
Site Name:
BORG WARNER MECHANICAL SEA('
Address:
27941 fRONTSr
city:
1EMECULA .
County:
R/✓ERMX
State:
CA
Case No:
9Ur758
Zip:
92590
Stop Date:
6/8/1987
Status Desc:
C.ASECLOSED .
Sub Desc:
TCE
Case Type Desc:
AQUIFER AFFECTED(MUMCIFALUSE)
Lead Agency Desc: -
REGIONAL BOARD MWOCB)
Local Agency Desc:
AVMDE
Priority Desc
MGNPMORRY, WAMZRESOURCEPROIEC17ON
Program Desc:
R3LE4DU1wDERGROUNDSTORAGE1ANK
Fields Not Reported by the Source
xsaeet(l), Substance Qry(1). Darel(1) Date3a(t), foe DBpay(1)
A
ency for this Site:
g
Agency Address:
BORG WARNER MECHAAMAL SEAL
27941 FRONTST
7EMECULA CA 92590
Site Name;
BORG WARNER M£CI4 LAICAL SEAL
Street Number.
27941 _
Street Name:
FROMST
CRY:
WMECULA
Zip;
92590
Region:
09
N 'VISTA address includes enhanced city and UP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
✓e n Z?` - page l3o
v
Case Number.
Case Type:
Lead Agency:
Status:
Substance:
Abatement Method:
Enforcement Type:
Funding:
How LUST was Discovered:
How LUST was Stopped:
Cause:
Source:
t Date:
N Date:
Not Reported by the Source
:v for this Site:
Agency Address:
EPA Region:
Significant Non-Complier Indicator.
RCRA Facilty Classification(s):
Notification Type:
Contact:
Indicator:
33
9UT758
ACOULFIER
RWOCBACIIVECASE
CASECLOSED
TCE
PUMP AND IRFAT GROUND WATER
CLEANUP AND A84 I EMENT ORDERS
RESPONSIBLEPARTY
TANKCLOSURE
CLOSE TANK
RB LEAD UNDERGROUND STORAGETANK
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
614VI987
2122/1000
:nay-whstance Lwked (G)(1). Aspended(1), La&We(T).
Date leak CoMkned(1), Date FWm SiteAssezment Wodrpfan
FICHa INDUSTRIESINC
18007FRONTSr
TEMECULA CA 92390
09
HANDLERTSNOTASIGNTFTCANTNON-COMPLTERATBEGTNNTNGOFFISCAL YEAR
HANDLER ISNOTA MEMBER OFTHESUBTECTTO CORREC77VEAC7701V UNIVERSE
NORFICARONDATA-CORE
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGER
(714) 676-5721
CURRENT OWNER
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and UP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Version 2.7 Page I31
L
Owner/Operator Type:
PMVAFE
Owner/Operator Name:
MARLOW£APICNa
Phone:
(115)555-1112
Owner/Operator Indicator.
CURRENTOPERAFOR
Owner/Operator Type:
FWAFE
Owner/Operator Name:
NOFREWRED
Phone:
(415) 555-1212
SIC Code:
3444
SIC Code Source-
RtPORF£DBYFACILRY
SIC Code:
3832
SIC Code Source:
REPORTED BYFACILRY
Generator Indicator.
SMALL QUANRFYG£N£RATOR
Transporter Indicator. .
UNV£RINED -
TSD Indicator.
NOFA TSD, UNVENFIED
Burner/Blender Indicator,
UNVERF/ED
Generator Status:
RCRAREGULATED
Fields Not Reported by the Source
061+rFrar4wdadonlndicator(1),Ce ramraatusDesaiPCon(1). Fiaruponer
Agency for this Site:
-term aesaipr/on(1), ADSratus Desaipton(1), Burrter/Blend Srstus
Desaipoon(1). FransponerMatus(1), W SWtus(1), L1v/rie IRWVaSratus(1). Used
01ftpe
ftg t Status Ev k bbn Covere Area l
!RCR4
t -
_
_
.6
MEM
NM
O
I
Agency Address:
PICI+a INDUSTRES
28007ERONTST
IOl4£CULA CA 0
Site Name:
PICNa INDUSTRIES _
Address:
28007FROMSF .
City:
TEMECULA
County:
R!Vmx
State:
CA
Case No:.
9U"504
Zip:
82590
Stop Date:
8/21/1989
Status Desc:
CASECLOSED
Sub Desc:
NICKEL
Case Type Desc:
SOIL ONLY
Lead Agency Desc:
_ REGIONAL BOARD (RWQCB)
Local Agency Desc:
AVMDE
Program Desc•
RBL£AD UNDERGROUNDSTORAGEFANK
Fields Not Reported by the Source
xsaeet(1), Substance 00,(1), oate5c(1), Date8(1), Prioriry(D. Abatement
Agency for this Site:
Med-d(1), 6,Tacement Date(l), ao Use(1), Wdr (1) . Npdesnum(1).
' '
Abatement Metlrod Desc , Benerk al Use Desc l)
Desc 1
VISTA address includes enhanced city and UP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Version Z,7 - Page 132
1
Agency Address:
P(CNEL INDUSTRIES
28W7ERONTSr
TEMECULA CA 925917
Site Name:
PICNEL INDUSMIES
Street Number.
28897
Street Name:
PRONTST
City:
TEMECULA
Zip:
92590
Region:
09
County:
33
Case Number.
9UT1504
Case Type:
son
Lead Agency:
RwaceACnvECarE
Status:
CASECLOSED
Substance:
NICKEL
Abatement Method
AGENCYCODEQ
Enforcement Type:
AGENCYCODEQ
Funding:
RESPON57BIf PAR1Y
How LUST was Discovered:
TANKCLOSOW
How LUST was Stopped:
CLOSE TANK
RBLEAD UNDERGROUND STORAGETANK
Cause:
UNKNOWN
Source:
UNKNOWN
Leak Confirmed
872111989
rt Date:
- 813"98.9
'W Date:
211572 0 0 0
Not Reported by the Source
CmsSS&eer(U, CWVC0de(1), Cleanup fund lD(1), So80uaffi r(T), MBEh
cY for this Site:
Sor(t), Groundwara Quarha(1). MWh C,rou dwata0). Pwoey(1) Quarwo
Summary(1),
Yon MoNLOnn
VISTA address includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 899001901. Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Yenion Z.7 Page AF33
F
Address:
Underground Tanks:
Aboveground Tanks:
/EMECULA ✓ALLEYPIPE SUPPLY
28074 DEL RIO
rEMECULA CA 92390
1
NO7REP0MED
NorREPORIED
Agency Address: ERENCNYSAUrOCEWER
28093 FROW Sr
TEMECULA CA 92390
EPA Region: 09
' VISTA address Includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 6403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Version 27 Page /34
Non-Compeer Indicator.
RCRA Facilty Classification(s):
Notification Type:
Contact:
Phone:
Owner/Operator Indicator
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Operator Name:
Phone:
Owner/Operator Indicator:
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Operator Name:
Phone:
Generator Indicator.
Transporter Indicator.
TM Indicator.
Burner/Blender Indicator.
Generator Status:
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency for this Site:
NAND[ERISNOTASIGNInCANT NON-COMPUERAT BEGINNINGOFf7SCAL YEAR.
HANDLER IS NOT A MEMBER OFTHE S(I87ECT TO CORRE011VEAC1701V UNIVERSE
NOTIFTCARON DATA - CORE
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGER
(714) 676-2568
CUREMOWNER
PRVAIE
SHRAD MOGUL
(415) 555-1212
CURREMOPFAATOO?
PRYVAIF
NOT REQUIRED
(415) 555-1212
SMALL OVANTITY GENERA TOR
UNVERIFIED
NOTA ISD, UNWZWD
UNVERRED
RCRA REGULATED
Offwrransportabonlrrd7 tor(1),GeneratorStatos DesplpBon(I) traaWoatef
Stang Dewiobon(I), TSOStana oescapbon(1).&u 1229knda-Stana
Desoipbon(I), 7nvW0ner5Wtw(1). TSOStatus(1), Burmri8/erMerStatres(1), Used
OiRecWffRCRA R"&torVStatus(1) .
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report January 17,2001
Version 2.7 Page135
Use:
UNUSED
Depth:
Latitude:
Longitude:
216.0
33:613666668686
-117.1636171111
Surface Elevation:
1017
Date Well Drilled:
0110111914
County FIPS:
6666
:ncy Address:
S4Mt A6A60Vt
Region:
09
Meant Non-Complier Indicator.
NANDURISNOTA 9GN/fTCANTNON-COMPUERATBEGINNINGOEFISCAL YEAR
A FaCIRy. Classification(s):
HANDIEOMNOTA MEMBER OMESUBI£CTTO CORREMEACRONUNN£RSE
no:
0-
ner/operator Indicator.
CURR£NTOWNER
ner/Operator. Type:
PRVATE
ner/Operator Name:
EFREN IERRA74S
ne: _
(909J 676-6433
terator Indicator
SMALL OUANRTYG£NER4TOR
isporter Indicator.
UNVERFrED
Indicator.
NOTA TSD, UNV£R'FIED
ier/Blender Indicator.
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Version 2.7 Page 136
UNVERFTED
Generator Status. RCRA REGULATED
Fields Not Reported by the Source NO&7C8Obn Type(I), CwKact(1). M(1). ContactAddm s(1). Mw 1n3nspodaObn
A9encY for this Site: lnd/cator(1), GwawtorS'tatu; DmaObOn(1), rratupodersrau5(2), 7$Dstaft tgz),
Oestxi tion / Comment:
0
•
}.~:.i^ .Y.. ,.f F
~~~.L'i
J., n' F y:(f f. i.l.C G tk.t .
Agency Address:
Moss
28111 FRONTST
TEMECULA CA0
Site Name:
M061L
Address:
28111 FRONTSr
City:
TEMECULA
County:
RIVERSIDE
State: -
CA
Case No:
9VrT805
Zip:
92590
Status Desc:
CAS£CLOSED
Sub Desc:
MISC. MOTOR VMCLEFUL7.S
Case Type Desc:
SOL ONLY
Lead Agency Desc:
LOCAL AGENCY (COUNTY)
Local Agency Desc:
RY BUDE
Program Desc:
LOCAL OVERS/GNTPROGRAM UST
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Substance 4ry(1), How 01SCOVd'ed(1), GraundwaterLgpth(1), Datel(1),
Agency for this Site:
Date3b(1). Date5c(1)• DateSr(i), Date7(1). DateB(1), Pl"0(1). En/orcema+t
Date(1). Stop Date(1), Basri(1). 8e7ehdal Use(1), Wdm (1). Npde =(1),
Benefi aWse 11 How Dsrnvered Descl: 1
.G0.
!F'~ »vsT
Agency Address:
SAMEASASOVE
Site Name:
MOR& -
Street Number
28111
Street Name:
FRoNrsr
City:
TEMECULA
zip:
92590
Region:
09
County:
33
Case Number.
AM806
Case Type:
soi
Lead Agency:
LOCAL AGENCY
Status:
CASECLOSED
Substance:
MSC. MOTOR VEI9GY£FULLS
Abatement Method
. £XC✓1 VATEAND DSPOSE
Enforcement Type:
AGENCYCODEO
Funding:
RESPONABLEPARIY
Now LUST was Discovered:
AGENCYCODEO
• VISTA address Includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Dale of Report January 17, 2001
Version 2.7 Asget37
How LUST was Slopped:
RLPAIRPIPING
Program
LOCAL OVERSIGHT PROGRAM UST
Leak Cause:
UNKNOWN
Leak Source:
PIPING
Report Date:
911911990
Review Date:
51111992
Fields Not Reported by the Source
CountyC06e(1), Cleanup Ftvd1D(1), So1QuaGFt I). MMEm S01(1)
Agency for this Site:
Groundwater' Qua&Wl), MWn Cr ndwater(1) AWam(r), PiloWl), Staff(i),
Quan6tyo/RmmySu6stat leaked(G)(1), SWs Wel(l), 9adn(1), Bmdfa l
LWI). Ladwde(1), Lonq&ude(1), Summay(1), Date Leak Cmrimed(1), Date
PrelitN SteAZMWX tBegan(1), Date "Won Characte awn8Wan(l).
-
Date Renvdlabon Plan &&n*W(1). DateRemedelAcBon Vnde ay(l), Date
1bstRemedWAc0on Mon/t0ing8eg(l), Date ofMforcementAc0on(1), MIRE
Oa 1, Stop Date(l)
$.~T^.~i... ' TYC"J.h^f".-
. :rte' _ _ 9? r i'< ,
Agency Address:
NAroNOa CO
18111 FROM
MMECULt CA 921280000
List Name:
LEAKING TANK
Site ID:
9UT2937
rv
Agency Address:
O£LTA DXSCOUNTGAS
28111 FRONTST
TEMECULA CA
Facility ID:
94094.017
Remediation Status:
PREUMINARYAS5ESSMENT
Media Affected:
AQUFERCONTAMINAMD
Descri Lion / Commend:
n
-
Agency Address:
DELTA DISCOUNTGAS
28111 FRONTST
TEMECULA CA 0
Site Name:.
DELTA DISCOUNT GAS
Address:
28111 FRONM .
City:
TEMECULA
County:
RNOWDE
State:
CA
Case No:
9UT2937
N VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
✓etvon2.7 Paget38
tip:
92590
Status Desc:
PREUMLNARYS?EASSESSMENTWORKPLANNASBaNREO
Sub Desc:
NOTREPORTED
Case Type Desc:
SOIL ONLY
Lead Agency Desc: -
LOCAL AG£NCY(COUN1)
Local Agency Desc:
AV£2SIDE
Program Desc:
LOCAL OVUSIGHT PROGRAM LIST
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency for this Site:
xst eer(1). substameOry(1), D6wa Dare(1),1lowDscovered(1) Now
DDaa~~(1~t Dates 1) NbtKy(1), Ab(at)ement M1MW(1),5& e~1).
DaW(1), Stop Date(1), W&m (I), Npde =(1), AbetenwgMedadDesr(T),
r
Agency Address:
SAMEASABOVE
Site Name:
DELTA DISCOUNT GAS
Street Number,
28111
Street Name:
FRONrsr
City:
TEMECULA
Tip:
92590
Region:
89
County:
33
Case Number.
9UT2937
Case Type:
SOIL
Lead Agency:
LOCAL AGENCY
Status: _
PRELIMINARYSVEASSESSMENIWORKPLAN SUBMTTED
Abatement Method
AGENCYCODfQ
Enforcement Type:
AG£NCYCOD£Q
Funding:
RESPONSIBLEPARTY
How LUST was Discovered:
AGENCYCODEQ
How LUST was Stopped:
AGfNCYCOOEQ
LOCAL OVfRSIGHTPROGRAM LIST
Leak Cause:
UNKNOWN
Leak Source:
UNKNOWN
Report Date:
21711994
Review Date-
1112911994
N VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 8110 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Verson 27 Page /39
Fields Not Reported by the Source Cio-sgeer(1) County CodeO), Sub tancea), Cleanup R1ndID(1) Sol
Agency for M Site: QuaWar(1), MIREb So1(1). GroundwataQuardWl), Malin GrowWwatwo,
. Rogram(1), Rkmty(1), QuanOryofRimmySubswa aLeaked(G)(1)
,
Suspended(1). La&We(1), Longitude()), Summary()), Date Leak Cbr*med(1),
DateRelmitr &teAsseume &Wan(1), Date P&Won Charactdafton
Began()), Date Remedi~ Flan &6inltted(1) Date RemedialAchm
Underway(I) Date PostRenredialActbn MontaM Beg()), Date the Case was
Closed()), Date Leak was Dbcovaed(1), Date OfEnf=ementAcffon(l), MIRE
Notification Type
Contact
Phone:
Owner/Operator Indicator.
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Operator Name:
Phone:
Generator Indicator.
Transporter Indicator.
Indicator.
Burner/Blender Indicator.
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency for this Site:
09
NANOLERISNOTASIGMFICANTNON-COMPLIERATBECTNNINGOFFISCAL YEAR.
HANDLER IS NOT A MEMBER OFTN£ SUBF£CT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION UNIVERSE.
NORFICARONDATA-CORE
JOHN
HARPER
(714) 699-7161
CURRENTOWNER
PRVATE
NORMANHAMES
(310) 337-1535
SMALL QUANnTYGENERArOR
UNVERRED
NOTA TSD, UNV£I1NED
UNVERFED
RCRA REGULATED
TSD Status Uesalpaon(1). Burer1B6-1defStatw
oderSlatWI) 1SDStatus(1) Bu IabndaStaaa(1) Used
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 8890019111 Date of Report January 17, 2001
Version 2.7 Page Ei0
ncy Address:
Region:
ificant Non-Complier Indicator.
Facilly Classification(s):
r
u
Address: -
ECONOLUBEMIUNE,
17685JEFFERSON
7EMECULA CA 92390
wnd Tanks:
I
round Tanks:
NOTREPoRrED
moved:
NOrRFPoRrED
C
Agency Address:
OPT022INC
43044 BU57NESSPAW DR
7EMECULA CA 92390 -
EPA Region:
09
Significant Non-Compeer Indicator
NANOLERLSNOTA SIGMF7CANTNON-COMPLIERATBEGINNINGOFFISCAL YEAR
RCRA Facilty Classification(s):
IGINDLERISNOTA MEMBEROFR ESUBIECTTO CORRECMTACnON UNIVERSE
Notification Type
NOnFICAnONDAM -CORE
Contact
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGER
Phone:
(774) 891.5861
Owner/Operator Indicator:
CU)NEAROWNER
Owner/Operator Type:
PRIVATE
Owner/Operator Name:
ROBERTGENGMAN
Phone:
(415) 555-1212
Owner/Operator Indicator:
COWNrOPERATOR .
Owner/Operator Type:
PRIVATE
Owner/Operator Name:
NOTREQUIRED
Phone:
(415) 555-1212
SIC Code:
3679 -
SIC Code Source:
RD'ORTEDBYFA(3LRY
Generator Indicator.
AMU QUANRrYGENERATOR
Transporter Indicator.
UNVERIFIED
TSD Indicator.
NOTA 150, UNVERIFIED
BumerBlender Indicator:
UNVERFIED -
Generator Status:
RCR4 REGULA7ED _
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2007
Vetron 2,7 Pagel4l
lelds Not Reported by the Source Odra' Banwatationbdicator(1)• General«StetwD rapoon(1), rmnwp tw
\gency for this Site: states Desad0dar(1). TSDStaaa Dam7pdar(1), &xnwABle,rderstatw
Ueso•Jpdon(1), Tiarspoaef S'tada(1). TSOStatw(1)• &m 19bnderstatus(1), Used
Of Recyda RCRA Regtdatay 2aan(1)
iWIM
ARE,
Agency Address: CRVOQUTPINC
43465 BU9NES S PARK DR UN/TA
TEMECULA CA 92390
EPA Region: 09
significant Non-Complier Indicator
NANIXERKNOTASTGN/FTCANTNON-COMPUERA/B£GINNINGOTf6CAC YFAR
RCRA Facilty Classification(s):
TIANDLERTSNOrA MEMBER OM ESUMCITO CORRECMIEACWNUNNERSE
Notification Type N0R(1CARONDAM -CORE
Contact ENVIRONMENTAL
-
MANAGER
-
Phone: (714) 677-2060
Owner/Operator Indicator CURTFMOWNER
Owner/Operator Type: PRVATE
Owner/Operator Name: RMBROwN
Phone: (415)555-1212
'
Owner Operator Indicator. CURTENTOPERATOR
Owner/Operator Type: PRVALF
Owner/Operator Name: NOTREOKBRED -
Phone: (415) 555-1212
Generator Indicator.
.
SMAU (2U4N77JYG£NERAT0R
Transporter Indicator.
uNVtYdTIED
TSD Indicator.
-
NOTA75D, UNVERFIEO
Burner/Blender Indicator
uNVDax1ED
Generator Status: RCR4 REGULATED
Fields Not Reported by the Source Other TmnWcrtadon hrd tor(1), Genarator5tada Dwaow(1), Transporter
Agency for this Site: Status Dss ip6on(1), TW As" Dawnpdon(1), Btm 18bnderStana
.
Qewip6on(1)• TrarrsportaStatra(1), I517 Statm(1), Bu lfflends Statm(V, Used
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 -0403. ,
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Verdun 2.7 Page 442
t
ncy Address:
CHEVRONSTA17ON99917
27560JEFFERSCW
IEMECULA CA 92390
Region:
09
Ificant Non-Complier Indicator.
HANDLERISNOTA.9GN/FICANTNON-COMPL/ERATBEGINN/NGOffISCAL YEAR
A Facilty Classification(s):
HANOLERISNOTA MEMBER OFIHESUBIECTTO CORRECUVEACRONUN/VERSE.
Iication Type
NOTIRCA77ONDATA -CORE
tact
JAMES
RAMSEY
ie:
0 -
ier/Operator Indicator.
CURRENTOWNER
N• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Verson 2.7 Page 143
Agency Address: • PROFESSIONAL HOSPRAL SUPPLY
432151IMNESSPAINDR
IFMECULA CA 92390
Spill Date: JUNE22 1990
Split Location: 432258US/1VESSP4RXOR
Material Snillell- SULFUNCAC102%
Owner/Operator Type:
PNVAIE
Owner/Operator Name:
CHEVRON USA PRODUCTS CO
Phone:
(310) 694-7152
Generator Indicator
SMALL QUANRrYGENERAFOR
Transporter Indicator.
uNVENH£D
TSD Indicator.
NOIA TSD, UNVENNED
Bumer/Blender Indicator:
UNVWRED
Generator Status•
RCRAREGULAIED
Fields Not Reported -by the Source
Othe TmnWataUonlndreatr(1). GaxMtor51aaa Desaipuan(1). rranspater
Agency for this Site:
Status De paon(l), 75DStaan DesaFpKon(1), Buner/Wenderstaaa
Desaipbw(1), Rarap01tff5t8tW(1), TSD.Ratus(1), Bunrr7Bkndw.%atus(1). Used
oaa RG7tA sreaa 1
C
_
_
rr
.
Agency Address.
CHEVRONJEFFERSONSIRW
27560JDTERSON
TEMECULA CA 92390
Underground Tanks:
4
Aboveground Tanks:
NorREPORFED
Tanks Removed:
NOFREPORIED
[
-
~
.~„x._ ~
~ .,.sue-
Agency Address:
JEFFFRSONSMEE7CHEVRON
27560JEFFERSONAVE
TEMECULA CA
Facility ID:
96259.oo
Remediation Status:
REMEDIAL 1NVF5r1GARONM ASE
Media Affected:
SOL ONLYLSIMPACrLD
Description / Comment:
0
Agency Address:
.10VERSON STREET CHEVRON
'
27560JDTE
R90NAVE
TEMECUL4 CA 0
Site Name:
JEFFEWN STREET CHEVRON
Address:
27560JEFFERSONAVE
City:
TEMECULA
County:
NVERSIDE
State:
CA
Case No:
9UM071 .
Zip:
92590
Status Desc:
PRfUMINARYSREASSESSMENIWORKPLANFWS'BErIVRfQ
Sub Desc:
GASOLINE
Case Type Desc:
AQUIFERAFFECIED (MUNICIPAL USE)
Lead Agency Desc:
LOCAL AGENCY(COUNM
Local Agency Desc:
NVVWDE
• VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
7V Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report- January 17,
Venlon 2 7 Page AP4
/44
' Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency for this Site:
Agency Address:
Fac Name:
Fac Address:
Fac City:
Fac St:
Fac Zip:
No Of Tanks-
Drg Id:
Fields Not Reported by' I he Source
A enc for this Sit
1), Substance WI), AkwwDate(1). How Obc vavd(1),
vkS&rce(1)• Leak CaIW(1). GroundwatwDVM(1)
Date5c(1). Date5r(1), Date7(1), DaWO), Date9(1),
AbeWnwtMedr d(1) fMac~t Type(j). Entcrcement
27560JEFFEMNAVE
1EMECULA C4 91590
CHEVRONJEFFERSONS11ffET
Z7560JEFFZZSONAVE
IEMECVLA
CA
91590
4
DRG-00176
Agency Address: S4MEASA9OVE
Site Name: JWERSONSnWCN£VRON
' Street Number 27560
Sheet Name: J97ERSONAW
City: MWECULA
Zip: 92590
Region: 09
Courdy: 33
Case Number 9UT4071
Case Type: ACQUIRER
Lead Agency:
LOCAL AGENCY
Status: PR£UMLNARY9rEAtSESSMENTWORIAmsuawnw
Substance GASOLINE
Abatement Method
AGENCYCODEQ
Enforcement Type:
AGfNCYCOOEQ
Funding:
- AGENCYCODEQ
Now LUST was Discovered:
AGENCYCODEQ
Now LUST was Stopped: AGENCYCODfQ
' VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc.. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Vetshn 2.7 Page u5
i
Cause:
source:
rt Date:
w Date:
; Not Reported by the Source
icy for this Site:
LOCAL OVERSIGHT PROGRAM UST
AG£NCYCOD£O
AGENCYCODEO
17171996
772072000
Date
Chwacte hon Began(1)• Date R67Wiadon Plan
Acton Undenvay(1), Date Post RemedialAcoon M~
was Closed(l), Date Leak was D&wvawd(1), Date
Agency address:
ncy Address:
Region:
fiicant Non-Complier Indicator.
A Facilty Classification(s):
Fication Type
43350 BUSINESS PARK LM
43350 BUSINESS PARK DMVE
TEMECULA CA 92390
09
HANDLERLSNOTASIGNIFICANTNON-COMPLIERATBEGINNINGOFFLSCAL YEAR
HAMX ER LS NOT A MEMBER OFTNE SU8 L£CT TO CORRECRVE ACRON UNNERSE
NORFICARONDATA-CORE
TOM
NICHOL$
(714) 676-6100
VISTA address Includes i
For more information call
Report ID: 899001901
Verslon 2.7
ZIP.
Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Page f46
f.
Owner/Operator Indicator _
CURRENTOWNER
Owner/Operator Type:
PRIVATE
Owner/Operator Name:
SOLD STATESTAMPING INC
Phone:
(415) 555-1211
Owner/Operator Indicator.
CMWNr OPEN TOR
Owner/Operator Type:
PRVATE
Owner/Operator Name:
NorRrwRED
Phone:
(415)555-1212
SIC Code:
3469
SIC Code Source:
REPORTEDBYFACNTY
Generator Indicator.
SMALL QUAN77TYG£N£RATOR
Transporter Indicator.
VMIDW IED
TSD Indicator.
NOTA75D. UNVWRED
Bumer/Blender Indicator.
-
UNVERFIED
Generator Status:
RCRAR£GUTATED -
Fields Not Reported by the Source
0&" Ratupatadon a di tcr(1). Genet WSWUtr Desa7ption(1), Transpata
Agency for Oft Site:
StaA5 De pUon(1), 730Staaa Dwap6on(7), Bunri/BlendwStatm
Dew/pdon(1). Transp01WStatm(1), ISO Statr (1), Btn AWandarStaas(1), Used
Address:.
ound Tanks:
round Tanks:
43225BU57NESSPAW
7DM£CULA CA 92390
2
NOTREPOWED
NOT REPOR7£D
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Version 2.7 Page N7
n
11
Fields Not Reported by the Source FaoAad auz(11
Agency for this Site:
Address:
ound Tanks:
round Tanks.
NOT REPORTED
NOT REPORTED
^r
_
Agency Address:
S4MEASABOVE
Fac Name:
AMPMMIMMA9KEr6472
Fac Address:
27691 YNEZRD
Fac City:
MWECUTA
Fac SC
CA
Fac Zip:
92691
.
NO Of Tanks:
4
Drg Id:
DRG-=23
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Fa Add -a 2(1)
Agency for this Site.
Agency Address:
ARCOSERVICESTAWW301
27641 YNEZ
TEM£CU1A CA
f.iSt Nam@:
1EAKINGTANK .
Site ID7
9MO31
~
3t. GGq^,l'...
.
c
Agency Address:
ARCOM12
27641 YNEZRO
TEMECUTA CA
Facility ID:
88778.00
Remedlaticn Status:
REMEDIACACRON
Media Affected:
AQUIFERCONTAMINAIED
Descri tion / Comment:
.0
yt s
r
<
3
MP
r
+z rm-o j e x '•r.. .-rc 'ui $ y. •
Agency Address:
ARCOSTABON13012
-
27641 YN£ZRD
TEMECU[A C40
Site Name:
ARCO STARON73012
' VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Verson 2.7 Fk ge N6
City:
IEMECULA
County:
NVERSIDE
State:
CA
Case No:
9UH031
Zip:
9Z590
Status Desc:
POS1 REMEOlAL ACBON UNDERWAY KMHMONUORS ME
Sub Desc:
MISC. MOTOR VEMCLENELS
Case Type Desc:
AQUIE£RA£PECIED(MUNICIPALUS£)
Lead Agency Desc:
LOCAL AG£NCY(COUNFYI
Local Agency Desc:
RIVERSIDE
Priority Desc
HIGHPMOMTY, WAIERR£SOURCEPROIECRON
Program Desc: -
LOCAL OVERMW PROGRAM L87
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Xsveet(l). Subste0 Ory(1). Olscov Date(1), HowD=overed(1), How
for this Site:
Agency
Stapped(1), Leak5ouce(l), Leak Cause(1), Datel(1), DaWa(V, Datesc(l).
Date&(1), Date9(1), Stop Date(l). FkD s#a.Kl), AbatemeMMeffW Desc(1),
BeneAcia/Use Oesc(l), HowD' vowdDesc(7). Now Stopped0ew(1). Leak
Agency Address: ARCOSMON3012
27641 YNFZRD
1EM£CULA, CA 92590
Site Name: ARCOSTA77ON3012 .
Street Number 27641
Street Name: YNEZRD .
.
City: IEMECULA
Zip: 92590
Region: 09
.
County:. 33
Case Number. 9Un031
-
Case Type: ACOUMER .
Lead Agency:
LQCALAGENCY
Substance
Abatement Method
Enforcement Type:
How LUST was Discovered:
How LUST was stopped:
Program
MISC MOTOR V£HCLEMELS
AG£NCYCOD£(V£GI)
AGENCYCODE(WOR)
R£SPONSIBLEPARIY
AGENCYCOOEO
AGENCYCODEO
LOCAL OVERSIGHTPROGRAM UFr
IV • VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Version 27 Page Jos
Leak Cause:
Leak Source:
Report Date:
Review Date:
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency for this Site:
AG£NCYCODEO
AGENCYCODEO
811911988
811112000
Cross beet(l) County Code(1). Cleanup Fund1D(1) S01Qu R7W1). M7BEkr
S48(7), Groundwater Qua6Tier(7), Opetator(T), AWam(7). Quantity ofPdmary
Substance Leaked (G)(1) Suspended(l) Latdude(1), Lotrgdude(7) Date Leak
Cm*nvd(1), Date Aerm$&eAzessment Work#a Sub(l). Date POlutkm
ClWactmzaWnBegan(1). Date Remediaton Ptah Submitted(l), Dateffie Case
EPA Region:
09
Significant Non-Compfief Indicator.
N4NDLERLSNOTASIGmRcANTNON-COMPMArBEG7NN7NGOFF7SCAL YEAR
RCRA Facility Classification(s):
NgrypLERISNOTAMEMBEROFIWSUBJECTTOCORRECnVEACBONUNNERSE.
Notification Type
NOAFKAnONDATA -CORE
Contact
NORMAN .
MUEN
Phone:
(909) 676-8833
Owner/Operator Indicator.
CUMWNTOWNER
Owner/Operator Type:
PRVALE
Owner/Operator Name:
KkUMRFAL ESTATE MGTCO
Phone:
(909) 6765641
Generator Indicator
.SMALL QUANITTYGENERATOR
Transporter Indicator.
UNVERRED
TSD Indicator.
-
NOTA W. UNVERRED
Bumer/Blender Indicator:
UNVERFIED .
Generator Status:
RCR4 REGULATED
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Odw Tmmpatatkm Indkator(U, Generator Status Desay*an(1) Trarupwter
Agency for this Site:
Staaa De =pdon(1). 130 State Desaipdon(1). Buner/aWO Statw
Desaipdon(1) rrarwpwwStatus(1), ISDStatus(1). &u IAWidx Status(1), Used
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report.ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Vemon2.7 Page 150
I
Agency Address:
SAMEASA60VE
Fac Name:
1NT RNARONAC RECARERNEATET
Fac Address:
41915809NESSPKOR
Fac City:
TEMECULA
Fac St:
CA
Fac Tip:
92590
No Of Tanks:
6
Dig Id•
DRC-00414
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Tacaddre 2(1) l
Aaencv for this Site:
A enc Address:
SAMEASAROVE
Chemical Abstract Service Registry:
Quanttt
v Released:
AMMOMA
8600 MO
UNDS)
NYTRICACID
255,00fil
OUNDS)
HPHOSPHORICACID
755.00 M
Z55.00 P
OUNDS)
OUNDS)
SULFURIC D
1131.W0
VUNDS)
NE IX£D/SO ERS
-
B68 00
- NDS
Agency Address:
NEXFETAMMCA
119158UNNESS'PARKDR
- TEMECULA CA 92590
Violation Number.
CAD9911595*6S0001
Area of Violation:
G£NEPATORAU REQUIREMENTS
Violation Class:
CrASS2
Priority Indicator.
NOTREPORTED
Date Determined:
7110911988
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Date RMAled(1), kheduled Response Date(1)
Agency for this Site:
Address:
INTERNARONAL RECn
4191580UNESSPARK
TEMECUTA, CA 92390
Dund Tanks:
9
round Tanks:
NOTREPORTED
moved:
NOTREPORTED
7V
VISTA address Includes enhan
For more information call VISTA
Report ID: 899001901
re n2.7
I ZIP.
Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 600 - 767 - 0403.
Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Page 151
r_
D
-`;fan
_
_ as
Agency Address:
HONZ14 CARS OF TEMECULA
275W JEWDWN
TEMECULA C4192390
Underground Tanks:
2
Aboveground Tanks:
NOTREPORTED
Tanks Removed:
NOTREPORTED
Agency Address:
HONDA OFTEMECULA
27500JEFFEWN -
TEM£CULA; CA 923900000
List Name:
LEWNG TANK -
Site ID:
9U73405
OW
N
Agency Address:
HONDA OF TEMECULA
_
275WJDTERSONAVE
-
MWECULA CA
Facility ID:
9W75.00
Remediation Status:
KEMEDW INMnGATLONRASE
Media Affected: -
AQU/FERCONTAMLNATEO
Descri tion / Comment
0
• VISTA address Includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Vasion 2.7 Page /52
I
Address:
27"JEFFERSONAVE
City:
TEMECULA
County:
NV£RS1D£
State:
CA
Case No:
9UT34a5
Zip:
92990
Stop Date
111011996 .
Status Desc:
RWEDWONPLANHAS BEENSUBMT7ED WHICHEVALUATE
Sub Desc:
GASOLINE
Case Type Desc:
AQUMAFFECTED(MUMCJPALUSE)
Lead Agency Desc:
LOCALAG£NCY(C0UND9 _
Local Agency Desc:
RFVBZWE
Priority Desc.
MODER47EPR100TY
Program Desc:
LOCAL OVBZ9GMPROGRAM UST -
Fields Not Reported by the Source
xmeer(1), Sutastan Qty(1J, Lean Cause(1J. Date1(1J. DaWb(1). DateSCO),
Agency for this Site:
Dae(1) . DateB(7J, Date9(1) . (mean(1J. AbatmemM~(1) . Ersae n
.
Type(1). &*A-ementDateO), Wdmrml(1), Npde"jm(1), Fie Dhptay(1), .
Abetem"Mettadj ,BaWcWU$a1 , Leak Cause Llesc7
Agency Address:
HONDA OFTEMECULA
275WJOTERSONAVE
TEMECULA CA 92590
Site Name:
HONDA OF nmrcum
Street Number
27500
Street Name:
J£FFBWONAVE
City;
1EMECULA
Zip:
92590
Region:
09
County:
33
Case Number.
9UT3405
Case Type:
ACQUIRER
Lead Agency:
COCALAG£NCY
Status:
REMfIXARONPLAN
Substance
GASOLINE
Abatement Method
AGENCYCODEU
Enforcement Type:
CLEANUPANDAMTEMENTORDERS
Funding:
aESPONSreLEVARTY
How LUST was Discovered:
TANKCLOSURE
How LUST was Stopped:
CLOSETANK
Program
LOCAL OVLRflGMPROGRAM UST
VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more Information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Vasson 27 Page 153
r
Cause:
Report Date:
Review Date:
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency for this Site:
Agency Address:
Name:
AGENCYCODEQ
TANK
1/29/1996
17/11/1999
crosss"a(1), coup{
so# gwfirer(1), MIKE.
(G)(1), Rq-lded(1),
Pm*mrkIT teAS
Date Remed&AcOa
UNOCAL STARONA6519
28903 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD
TEMECULA, CA 0
UNOCAL STAHON{6519
28903 RANCHO CALIFORMA RD
TEMECULA
WER5LDE
CA
ngKude(1), Date Leak Confimed(1), Date
, Date P0140on Charaawa8on Began(1),
Date Post Remedial Ac bon Monkoring
Case No:
9UT1433
Zip:
92590
Stop Date
312111989
Status Desc:
REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY
Sub Desc:
GASOLINE
Case Type Desc:
AQUIFER AFFECIED(MUNICIPAL USE)
Lead Agency Desc:
LOCAL AGENCY(COUNTY)
Local Agency Desc:
RIVERSIDE
Priority Desc
HIGHPRIORITY, WATERRESOURCEPROTECIION
Program Desc:
LOCAL OVERSIGHTPROGRAM LIST
7v
• VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
VeRbn 27 Page /54
11 .
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Agency for this Site:
Agency Address:
Site Name:
Street Number,
Street Name:
City:
Tip:
Region:
County:
Substance Qty(1), Datel(1), Date3a(1), Date5r(1) DaW(1), Date9(1)
En(aoen ent Date(1) Wdmwn(1), Npdeswrm(1) 17e aksplay(1), Abatement
Method Desc
UNOCAL SWON6519
26903 RANCHO CAUFOWA RD
TEMECULA, CA 92590
UNOCAL STAnON6519
28903
RANCHO CAUFORNU RD
MMECULA
97590
09
33
Case Number,
9UT1433 -
Case Type:
ACCw1F7ER
Lead Agency:
LOCALAGENCY
Status:
RLMEDIALACRON
Substance
GASOLINE
Abatement Method
AGENCYCODEaTVV
Enforcement Type:
AGENCYCODEQ
Funding:
E
B£wONSBL
PARTY
Now LUST was Discovered:
OR$RMEANS
How LUST was Stopped:
OTHERMEANS
Program
LOCAL ovER.srGHrPROGRAM rar
Leak Cause:
UNKNOWN
Leak Source:
TANK
Report Date:
3121119V9
Review Date:
712012000
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Cowlty Code(1) Cleanup Fund lD(1), Sol qualfiet(1), M78E1n S01(1),
Agency for this Site:
GroundwaterQuaWO (1), Program(1), QuanW ofPnmarySubstax Leaked
(G)(1), Su pended(i), Labtudde(1), Lon9ltude(1) Date Leak Con&med(1). Date
Prer=MeAssessrnent Workplan Sub(1). Date Remedwoon Plan Subm9t&d(1),
Date PbstRemedialAcbon MorrtcmgBeg(1), Date the Case was Closed(1), Date
olEnTOtcementAcobn 1, M78EDate(l)
N VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. .
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, inc. at 1 -800 - 767.-0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Vass nZ7. Page 755
Agency Address:
UNOCAL 16519
28903 RANCHO CALIF
RANCHO CALIF, CA 92390
Underground Tanks:
Aboveground Tanks:
NOTREPORTED
Tanir< Gmm~vuA•
NOT REPORTED
Agency Address: 5AMEASABOVE
Fac Name:. - MWECULA 766519
Fac Address: 28903 RANCHO CAUFORNIA RD
Fac City: 1EMECULA
Fac St: CA
Fac rip: 92590
No Of Tanks: 3
Drg Id: DRG-W739
Fields Not Reported by the Source FacAddhs 2(I)
Agency Address:
UNOCAL SERWCESTARONA
28903 RANCHO CAUfORN A
.
TEMECULA CA 92390
Ust Name:
(FAKING TANK
Site ID:
9U))433
Address:
CHEMAN191870
18"P4INCHOC.AUF
rEMfCULA, CA 92390
Dund Tanks:
i
ound Tanks:
NOTaEVORTED
~mevPd.
r
NOrREPORTED
f~
' VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report January 17, 2001
Uembn 2.7 Page 156
^
`
Agency Address: CHEVRONSERMESTMON9
289170 RANCHO C.4 LIFOP V14
MMECULA, CA 92390
List Name: LEAKLNG TANK
Site ID: 9UT106
t ?m1'A i.vv2T"'- 1 ^'Ti^Y )'u A
Agency Address: CHEVRON 1814 91870 r
28900 RANCHO CAUFORMA RD
TEMECULA C4,92590
Fac Name: CHEVRON 1814 91870
Fac Address: 28970 RANCHO CAUFORAM RD
Fac City: M4ECULA
Fac St: CA
Fac Tip: 925910
No Of Tanks: 2
Drq Id: DRG-00160
+ j- H F,
.
Fields Not Reported by the source
FacAddrez2(1J
A enc for this site:
Agency Address.
CHEVRON SERNCESTARON9-1870
28900 RANCHO CAUFORM4 RD
TEMECULA CA 92590
-
Site Name:
CHEVRONSDMCESTARON94870
Street Number
28990
Street Name:
RANCHO CAUFORMA RD
.
City:
7EMECUL4
.
Zip: -
92590
.
Region:
09
County:
33
Case Number.
9LM06
Case Type:
ACQU1HER
-
Lead Agency:
RWOCBACRVf CASf
Status:
POSTREMEDW AC77ONM01V70MVG
Substance
GASOLINE
Abatement Method
AGENCYC0DQFP✓E7
Enforcement Type:
CLEANUP AND A847EMEN! ORDERS
Funding:
RESPONSI&EPARIY
How LUST was Discovered:
TANK TEST
How LUST was Stopped:
REPAIR PIPING
Program
R8 LEAD UNDERGROUND STORAGETANK
• VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report I[): 899007901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
✓emon 2.7 Page f57
L. J
Leak Cause:
LOOSERT171VG
Leak Source:
PIPING
Report Date:
512111984
Review Date:
211512000
Fields Not Reported by the Source
CowtyCodea), CleanupfundlD(1) soda frw(1), MTBEktsoB(1), Quanwo/
'
for this Site:
Agency
PAknaryS
ubstance Leaked (G)(1) S *ended(1), LadWe(r), Longtude(1), Date
Leak Cof*med(i) Date PfeBm S&&Assessmer# Wor;#- wSub(1), Date the Case
was Closed 1. Stop Date(l)
Agency Address:
CHEVRON 19-1870
289MRANCHOCALIFRD
1EMECULA CA
Facility ID:
89158.00
Remediation Status:
CLOSED/ACWN COMPLETED
Media Affected:
GWIMPACTED
Description / Comment:
D
1K -
Mux
I~ r 4 ° r t x,
D'aictatlaitirfde"fgt` or a%iit%=~,Ei7
A
r ....i.~ sM.,_.._ R .E.^ a+.
Agency Address:
CHEVRON9RNCESTARON9-1870
2a900 RANCHO C"ORMA RD
7EMECULA CA 0
Site Name:
CHEVRON SERMESTMON 9-1870
Address:
28900 RANCHO CAUFORMA RD
City-
TEMECULA
County:
kVMDE
State:
CA
Case No:
9LM06
Zip: -
92590
Status Desc:
POSTREMEDAL ACRONUNDERWA Y WMCHMONITORS MEE
Sub Desc:
GASOUNE
Case Type Desc:
AQUIFLRAFFECIEO(MUMCIPALUSE)
Lead Agency Desc:
REGIONAL BOARD (RWQCB)
Local Agency Desc:
RIVERSIDE
Priority Desc
HIGHFROWY, WATERRESOURCEPROWCRON
Program Desc:
RBLEAD UNDERGROUNDSTORAGETANK
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Substance Qry(1), Date 1(1), Date3a(1), Date9(1), Stop Date(1) Wdmum(1), R8e
A enC for Lulls Site:
Olsplay(1) Abatement Method Desc(1), Senaldal Use De (7)
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, FS
Vem+on2.7 Paga e f58
fl
Address:
Tanks:
I Tanks:
Address:
Fac Name:
Fac Address:
Fac City:
Fac SU
Fac Tip:
No Of Tanks:
Dra Id:
by the Source
GTE RANCHO CALFORMA CO
41963MORENO
TEMECULA, CA 92390
1
NOT REPORTED
NOrwoRTED
TEMECULA, CA 92590
GTE CAUFORNM INCORPOR4 TEDR4NCHO CALIFORNIA Co
41963 MORENO RD
TEMECULA
CA
92590
1.
DRG-00367
Agency Address:
SaMSSUPER.WaL
28676 FRONTSr
TEMECU A, CA 0
Site Name:
S4MSSUP£RSNELL
Address:
28676 FRONT Sr
CRY:
TEMECULA
County:
NVERSDE
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Version 2.7 Page /59
1
F~
State:
CA
Case No:
9UT2367
Tip:
92590
Stop Date
11/18/7992
Status Desc:
PREUM7NARY511EASTESSMENTWORKPIANHAS6EENREQ
Sub Desc:
GASOLINE
Case Type Desc:
AQUFFRAFFECTED (MUNICIPALUS9
Lead Agency Desc:
REGIONAL BOARD (RW(?C6)
Local Agency Desc:
RIVERSIDE
PdGrity,Desc
HIGH PNOPoTY, WA TER RESOURCE PROTECTION
Program Desc:
RBLEAD UND£RGROUNDSTOP 4GETANK
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Substance Oty(7). Date1(1), Date3b(1), Date5c(7), Date5ra) Date7(1), Date8(1)
Agency for this Site:
Da e9 Ea7acement Type(i), Enforcement Date(l), Wdmum(7d Npdesnum(1).
FA. rjkr.1~11)
ncy Address:
Name:
at Number
at Name:
Number.
Type:
Agency:
Method
Type:
I How LUST was Discovered:
How LUST was Stopped:
Program
Leak Cause:
I Leak Source:
Date:
SAMEASABOVE .
SAMSSUPERSHELL
28,676
FRONTST
TEMECULA
92590
09
33
9UT2367
ACQU#WR
RWOCBACIIVECASE .
PR£LIMINARYSREA5Sa5 MENTWORKPLAN SUBMITTED
GASOLINE
REMOVEFREEPRODUCT
AG£NCYCOD£Q
AGENCYCODEQ
TANKCLOSURE
C105ETAIVK
RB LEAD UNDERGROUND STORAGETANK
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
11124/1992
N' VISTA address Includes enhanced city and UP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 7 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Version 27 Page I'm
C]
Review Date:
611212WO .
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Oo tyCode(1), Cleanup Fund V(1), opetato (1) Quan(ityofPdmWSu[atance
Agency for this Site:
Leaked (G)(1), Suspended(1), LabWe(7), Longkude(1), Date Leak Conrmred(1)
,
Date Ptelim/nmrySteAssessmentBegan(1), Date POA60n Che-acte&adon
Began(1), Date RemedoWn Plan Submltted(T), Date RemedlalAcdon
Undatway(1), Date PostRemedialAcBon Monkwring Beg(T), Date the Case was
Ckned 1. Date OffnforcementAcdon 1
rraF ~,1wr ~a ~ e td~` x~a ~ ~
't :c.
u.:c
r,~.
`~Y
'°s
'F
~XV
~
c
~
.y
~z.-~i~.
~
-
`'.-,.mss
•~y ~
y .c .ic4. ' Mr.~"~ ti ~ .m'~
x ~.y
.l
Agency Address.
T
FoRMEaMOty[
28677FRONTST
TEMECULA, CA 0
Site Name:
FOMWERMOen
Address:
18677FRONTST
City:
TEMECULA
County:
R/VERVDE
State:
C4
Case No:
9UT4066
Zip:
91591
Status Desc:
PRaAffIVARYS/TEASSMWENnyoRKPLANHASBEENLffO
Sub Desc:
GASOLINE .
Case Type Desc:
501 ONLY
Lead Agency Desc:
RFG1ONAL BOARD(RWQCB)
Local Agency Desc:
RIVME)c
Priority Desc
LOWMO97Y
ram DesC:
Pro
R8 LEAD UNDERGROUND SIORAGETANK
Fields Not Reported by the Source
XWeet(1), Substance Qty(1) GroundwaterDepm(7) Date1(1), Date3b(1),
Agency for this Site:
Datesc(1), Date50), Date7(1), DatWI). Date9(1), Intplm(1), Abatement
McUrod(1). Enforcement Type(1), En/otcementDate(1): Stop Date(1), Wdtnum(1),
'
N esnum 1, F8e LA
s a 14 AbatenwrMethod Desc . BenelrGa/Use 1
Agency Address:
F00MAMMOeL
28E77FRONTST
TEMECUL4 CA 92591
Site Name: -
FORMERMOBIL
Street Number.
28677
Street Name:
FRONTST
City:
TEMECULA
Zip:
92591
Region:
09
Co
33
Case Number.
9UT4066
Case Type:
SOIL
Lead Agency:
awOCeACnvECasE
Status:
P;WMINARYSREASSESSMENTWORKPLANSUBMLTTED
Substance -
GASOLINE
' VISTA address Includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Vaibn1.7
Page f61
Abatement Method
AGENCYCODE0
Enforcement Type:
AGENCYCODEp
Funding:
RESPONA'&EPARIY
How LUST was Discovered:
O1WRMEANS
How LUST was Stopped:
CLOSE TANK
Program
R9 LEAD UNDERGROUNOSTORAGE7ANK
Leak Cause:
UNKNOWN
Leak Source:
UNKNOWN
Report Date:
71111998-
Review Date:
711712000
Fields Not Reported by the Source
Cro 5&080), Counrycode(1) , peanuphodlD(1), lrte fi medo/Acvon(1).
Agency for this Site:
So1QualBa(1), MMEm5o1(1). GroundwaterQualfiW1). M1BE 7Groundwater(1).
Quan0ryofftnarySUtutance Leaked (G)(1)• Lamide(1), Longkude(1), Date Leak
Comm (1). Date ProWnary&eAssesvne 98egan(1), DatBPdluG0n
_
Charaaaiw&t Began(1), Date Remodwbon Plan SubnWed(r) . Date Remedial
Ac1lon Undetw l), Date PostRenie"Acdon Monto6V Beg(1), Date the Case
was posed 1, Date ofFnforcew"Acaon 1, MME Da 1, Stop Date(l)
Agency Address: -
14MEASABOIIE
Well ID:
333020117084901
Use:
UNUSED
Depth:
30.00
Latitude:
33.505555555555
,Longitude:
-1171489444444
Surface Elevation:
1058.
Cou FIPS:
BOBS
N
VISTA address Includes enhan
For more information call VISTA
Report ID: 899001901
vels/on 2.7
Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Page ^7
Use:
PU6UCSUPPLr
Latitude:
Longitude:
33.498333333333
-177.7494444444
Surface Elevation:
7022
Static Water Level:
6.00
County FIPS:
6065
Agency Address:
CDFSTA 12
28330 MERCEDES
TEMECULA, CA 9Z3900000
List Game:
L&WrNG TANK -
Site ID:
9UT2959
:
1.
'7
.
.:..i~.eF ~'n ^T
,
r,'^ Rr o-'K'^:
.
~ F
W'•''
j
.
.YT
Agency Address:
CDFSTAnONf12
28330MERCEOIESST
TEMECULA CA
Facr ID
94144.00
Remediation Status:
PREUM7NAWASSESSMENT
Media Affected:
AQUMCONTAM7NATED
Description / Comment:
0
to
ull
Agency Address:
CDFSTARON112
28330 MERCEDES ST
TEMECULA CA 0
Site Name:
CDFSTAR0N111
Address:
28330 MERCEDES Sr
City:
TEMECULA
.County: -
RIVERSIDE
State:
CA
Case No:
9UT2959
Zip:
92590
Stop Date
112111994
N
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Ve n 2.7 Page 163
Status Desc:
PREUMINARYSPEASSESSMEN17S UNDERWAY WMCNMAY
Sub Desc:
DIESEL
Case Type Desc:
SOIL ONLY
Lead Agency Desc:
LOCAL AGENCY(COUNTY)
Local Agency Desc:
RIVERSIDE
,
Program Desc:
LOCAL OVMGHrPROGR4MUSr
Fields Not Reported by the Source
SuttttanceQW(1). GewndwawDepUr(1). Date1(1). Darn
for this Site:
A
enc
DateWl), Dare7(1). Date8(1) . Date9(1). riivWI). Abate
g
y
Ewbmerrtent /YpeO) Enlacettletx Date(11. W&wm0). j
Agency Address: CD£STARON 12
28330 MERCEDES 57
TEMECULA CA 92590
Site Name: CD£STARON 12
Street Number 26330
Street Name: MLRCEDESS7
laity. TEMECULA
Zip: 92590
Region; 09
rtna mrv 33
Case Type:
SOIL
Lead Agency:
LOCALAGLNCY
'
Status:
PR£LMINARYMEASSESYh1£NTUND£RWAY
Substance
L„LSE[
Abatement Method
AGENCYCODEO
Enforcement Type.
AGENCYCODEQ
RESPON.9 PARTY
LUST was Discovered:
rANKCLOSUR£
LUST was Stopped: CLOT TANK
LOCAL OVOWGNrPROGRAM UST
Cause:
UNKNOWN
Leak Source:
UNKNOWN
Report Date: 212411994
Review Date: 11411995
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Veaion27 Ragelu
fl
Fields Not Reported by the Source County Code(1), Cleanupfund1V(1), Sod'Qusfr elO), MMEfn SW).
Agency for this Site: GroaMwata Qua66er(V, M78Em Croundwata(1), Progam(1), Rkxity(1).
Qu ttyaFpmaySudsta Leaked(C)(1), Suspended(1), LaoAde(1),
Lorgkude(1), Dale Leak ConWrwd(1), Date Relit SileAueament Wakpplan
&WI), Date Pohobn Chi acta¢aaon Began(1), Date Remedodon Ran
Stmikted(1), Date RanedialAcBon Undaway(1), Date Post Ratedia(Actfon
Morwodig Beg(1), Date Me Case was Ckised(1), Date ofEnfa etAcoon(1)
Agency Address:
SAMEASABQVE
We0 ID:
332850117085901
Use:
FIRE
Depth:
94.60
Latitude:
33.497222222222
Longitude-
-11Z 1497222222
Surface Elevation:
1012.
Static Water Level:
27.60
Date Well Drilled:
01/0111949
Coup FIPS:
6065
Address:
333015117084101
DeptiL 53.00
Latitude: 33.504166666666
Innnitiuia• -117.1447111112 -
Surface Elevators: 1060.
Static Water Level: 44.00
Countv FIPS: 6065
N' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
✓ers/on 2.7 Page165
• VISTA address Includes enhan
For more information call VISTA
Report ID: 899001901
Version 2.7
>ns, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Page to
J
Latitude: 33508333333333
Longitude: -117.1427777777
Surface Elevation: 1069
Co RIPS: 6065
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
version 2.7 Page t67
n
I Ij
Agency Address:
SWEASABOVE
Solid Waste Inventory System ID:
33-AA-"7
Facility Type:
SOLID WASrESRES-CLASSB/- LandNs fornonhazard=soAd wastes.
Facility In State Board Waste Discharger
NO
System:
Chapter 15 Facility:
NO
Solid Waste Assessment Test Facility:
NO
Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Facility:
NO
RCRA Facility:
NO
Department of Defense Facility:
NO
Open To Public:
NO
Number Of Waste Management Units:
1
Rank:
NOrAEPOR1ED
Enforcements At Facility:
ra
Violations At Facility:
YES
Agency Address:
SWEASA80VE
Well ID:
333121117094601
Use;
1RRLGARON
Depth:
500.0
Latitude;
335225
Lon Rude:
-17 71627777777 .
Surface Elevation-
1048.
County FIPS:
6065
,iv
For more information call VISTA
Report ID: 899001901
✓embn 2.7
and ZIP.
ion Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Page N8
Agency Address
S4MEASABOW
WeIIID;
332938117091201
Use: -
DOME511c
Depth:.
774.0
Latitude:
33493388983338
Longitude:
-117.1533333333
Surface Elevation:
1003.
Static Water Level:
4900
County HIPS:
3035
?aklg It'
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17,
Version Z7 Page Page t6
/39
d
Site Name:
Street N
Street N
City*
Zip:
Region:
County:
Case Number.
Case Type:
Lead Agency:
Status:
Substance
Abatement Method
Enforcement Type:
Funding:
How LUST was Discovered:
LUST was Stopped:
N4 VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
Address:
CAUEORMA NGHWAYPAMot
2768SCOMMMCECMDRA
MWECULA, CA 92590
CAUFORN/A IfGNWAYPAMot
umber
27685 -
ame:
COMM£RCECJRLMA
7EMECVLA
92590
09
33
SOIL
LOCAL AGENCY
PRa MLNARYSUEASSESSMENTWORKPLANSUBMLr1ED
GASOLINE
EXCAVArEANOLYSPOSE
AGENCYCODEO
RESPON IBLEPARrY
OMM MEANS
OIHERMEANS
LOCAL OV£]LSLGHrPROGRAM USr
For more Information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report January 17, 2001
Ve sbn 2.7 Page f70
Leak Cause:
UNKNOWN
Leak Source:
UNKNOWN
Report bate:
311412"
RevieW Date:
712012000
Fields Not Reported by the Source
C/ossSrieet(1), County Code()), C/earwp£undlD(1) Imeim RemedkVAcWn(1),
Agency for this Site: _
SolOua6Fia•(1). MWEm Sod(l) Gwo dwaWQuafra(1). M78Ev Gmundwater(1).
AWam(1). QuantdyotArnay lubstanceLeaked (G)(1), t.antrtde(l)•
Long"e(7), Date Leak Con&nwd(1), Date PraWwaySrteASSessmentBegan(1),
Date Poduoon Charactahauon Began()), Date Rwwdoton Plan Subawed(1),
Date Raned/alAcdon Underway()). Date Post RavedalActtonMontoft
Begin Date the Case was Cbsed(1), Data ofEn(arement Acoon(1), MW
Date 1, Stop Date(l)
a ~ ..r ~ r ~ ~ 'a.+^ j a r.a •^y ~ , ~ r-e. ' ~,~F1a.
"•'2f
' a
.t1
'e '
r r
l Y
v
`
~
F
.
.
._'F;is~
«
,3i F3
.
p
~
r.. .
C3
~L
f''.~:w sc eR~f h' nz-'i.~
Agency Address:
CAUFORMA IdGHWAYPATROL
17685 COMMERCE CIRLIRIA
TEM£CULA, CA0
Site Name:
CALIFORNIA NGNWAYPAIROL
Address:
27685COMMERCECIRDRIA
City:
MMECULA
County:
RlVERA'DE
State:
CA
Case No:
9UN036
jlp:
92590
Status Desc:
PMWINARYSREASSESSMENTWORKP(ANNASBEENWQ
Sub Desc:
GASOUNE
Case Type Desc: .
5O2 ONLY
Lead Agency Desc:
LOCAL AGENCY(COUNM
Local Agency Desc:
RWMDE
Priority Desc
LOWPRIORW
ram Desc:
LOCAL OVVMGNTPROGRAMUSr
Fields Not Reported by the Source
XVLO(l), substanceWl), GmmdwaterDepUs(1), Datei(1), Date3b(1),
Agency for this Site:
Date5c(1)• Date5r(1), Date7(1). Date9(1). Date9(1). WaYm(1), Enforcement
Type(7), Enforcement Date()), Stop Date(l), Wdmum(1), Npdesnum(1). Ba7efidal
Use Desc 1
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 787 -0403.
Report ID: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17,2001
Version 2.7 Page 171
Depth:
Latitude:
Longitude:
55.00
33.495833333333
•1171488888888
Surface Elevation:
1009.
Static Water Level:
24.00
Date Well Drilled:
0110111930
Co FIPS.
6665
Agency Address:
SAMEASABOVE
Well ID:
332944117085701
Use:
DoM
Depth:
5680
Latitude:
33.495555555555
Longitude:
•117.1491666666
Surface Elevation:
1006.
Date Well Drilled:
0110111959
Co RPS:
6W5
No Records Found
N' VISTA address Includes enhanced city and LP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
ReportJD: 899001901 Date of Report: January 17, 2001
Veabn2.7 1 Cage t72