HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-070 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION 91-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26861 TO DEVELOP A
14.68 ACRE PARCEL INTO 142 SINGLE FAMILy DETACHED CONDOMINIUM
UNITS LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 BETWEEN
PALA AND MARGARITA ROADS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
926-016-025.
WHEREAS, Presley of San Diego filed Vested Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WI-IEREAS, said Tentative Tract Map application was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Vesting Tentative Tract Map on
May 20, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the commission hearing, the Commission recommended
approval of said Vesting Tentative Tract Map;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Vesting
Tentative Tract Map on July 2, 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition to said Vesting Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding the Vesting Tentative Tract Map;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. FindinEs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city
shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-
month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or
the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
Reso 91-70 - 1-
general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other
actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
(a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
(b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
(c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside county, including the area now within the
boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines
while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the SWAP and
meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
general plan.
(1)
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in recommending approval of
projects and talcing other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title,
each of the following:
(a) There is reasonable probability that Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 26861 will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or
which will be studied within a reasonable time.
(b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
(c) The proposed use or action compiles with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
Re~o 91-70 -2-
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, no
subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made:
general and specific plan.
(a)
That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable
(b) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division
is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
(c) That the site of the proposed land division is physically
suitable for the type of development.
(d) That the site of the proposed land division is physically
suitable for the proposed density of the development.
(e) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed
improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
(f) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of
improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
(g) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of
improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through,
or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is
found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be
substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply
only to easements of record or to easements established by judgement of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
(2) The City Council in approving the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract
Map, makes the following findings, to wit:
1. There is reasonable probability that the proposed R-3 portion
of the project will be consistent with the future general plan. Furthermore, densities and uses
proposed are similar to existing densities and uses proposed are similar to existing densities and
uses in the vicinity of the projects site. The overall density for the entire 221 acres is 3.7 units
per acre which conforms to the SWAP designation of 2-5.
2. The proposed project does not conform with Ordinance No.
348 development standards for Planned Residential Developments (PRD) due to the fact that the
proposed development is proposing less than 1,000 square feet of ground floor living area which
is required. Therefore, the applicant respectfully requests that the Planning Commission
Reso 91-70 -3-
recommend an official waiver for the required minimum ground floor area.
3. Adequate public street access will be provided to every lot.
The legal owner of record has offered to make all required dedications.
4. The proposed project is physically suitable in design for the
proposed density due to the fact that only 5 % of the site net area is being designated as common
recreation area for a project with a density of 9.7 DU/AC.
5. Staff finds that site access will be adequate. Assessment
District 159 will provide for street improvements on Pala Road and Highway 79, and two (2)
access points to the site are shown on the map.
6. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be
consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted, in that the proposed design includes
sufficient common open space and may therefore be consistent with the future General Plan.
7. It is likely that the proposed vesting tentative map will not
constitute a substantial detriment to the future General Plan, if the proposed subdivision is
ultimately inconsistent with the plan, in that it may set a precedence of required common open
space that may not be detrimental to the Parks and Recreational elements of the General Plan.
8. The project will not have a significant adverse affect on the
environment. The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors certified EIR No. 281 in conjunction
with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 23267 and 23299. Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 26861 will not result in any new or substantially increased environmental impacts.
9. The proposed project makes adequate provision for future
passive or natural solar heating opportunities in that all proposed parcels have adequate southern
exposure.
10. The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of
Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
11. These findings are supported by minutes, map, exhibits, and
environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map
is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. The County of Riverside Board of
Supervisors certified EIR No. 281 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract
Map Nos. 23267 and 23299. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 will not result in any new
Reso 91-70 -4-
or substantially increased environmental impacts. An addendum to EIR No. 281 is hereby
recommended for adoption.
SECTION 3. Conditionn. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 for the development of a 14.68 acre parcel into 142 single
family detached condominium units located along the south side of Highway 79 between Pala and
Margarita Roads and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 926-016-025 subject to the following
conditions:
A. Attachment II, attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 1991.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Rcao 91-70 -5-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECLTLA )
I I-IF~RERY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of July, 1991, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans
ABSENT:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Greek,
R¢~o 91-70 -6-