Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout121918 PC Agenda ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DECEMBER 5, 2018 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 18-27 CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Gary Watts led the audience in the Flag Salute ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts, and Youmans Also Present: Watson, Fisk, Marroquin, Jones, Cooper, Moreno, and Jacobo PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests to speak. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes: RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of October 17, 2018 APPROVED 5-0, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER TURLEY-TREJO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS, GUERRIERO, TELESIO, TURLEY-TREJO, WATTS, AND YOUMANS 2 Director's Hearing Summary Report RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and File APPROVED 5-0, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TURLEY-TREJO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS, GUERRIERO, TELESIO, TURLEY-TREJO, WATTS, AND YOUMANS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2018 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 3 Planning Application No. PA18-0770, a Modification to the exterior elevations of the Palomar Village Shopping Center as well as adding approximately 272 square feet to Building A, expansion of patio area, and additional landscaping, Scott Cooper APPROVED 5-0, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WATTS, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS, GUERRIERO, TELESIO, TURLEY-TREJO, WATTS, AND YOUMANS RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 18-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA18-0770, A MODIFICATION TO THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS OF THE PALOMAR VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER AS WELL AS ADDING APPROXIMATELY 272 SQUARE FEET TO BUILDING A, EXPANSION OF PATIO AREA, AND ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Joshua Goldsmith (resident) addressed the Commission. Keith Newman (resident) addressed the Commission. CHAIRPERSON YOUMANS RECUSED HIMSELF FROM THE NEXT PUBLIC HEARING ITEM #4, DUE TO A POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND LEFT THE CHAMBERS AT 6:40 P.M. VICE-CHAIRMAN WATTS PROCEEDED WITH ITEM #4. 4 Planning Application Number PA18-1088, a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity application for Best Wei Chinese Health Food located at 27452 Jefferson Avenue, Eric Jones APPROVED 4-0-0-1, MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS, GUERRIERO, TELESIO, TURLEY-TREJO, AND WATTS; YOUMANS (RECUSED) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 18-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA18-1088, A FINDING OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY APPLICATION FOR BEST WEI CHINESE HEALTH FOOD LOCATED AT 27452 JEFFERSON AVE, 2 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2018 Page 3 AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 910-310-009) CHAIRMAN YOUMANS RETURNED TO THE DAIS AT 6:43 P.M. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE(S) DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, December 19, 2018, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Chairman Youmans adjourned the meeting at 6:50 P.M. ___________________________ ____________________________ Gary Youmans, Chairperson Luke Watson Planning Commission Director of Community Development 3 PC DRAFT RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA17-1614, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 1,850 SQUARE FOOT DRIVE-THRU STARBUCKS LOCATED AT 30690 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 14, 2017, Jeff Herbst filed Planning Application No. PA17- 1614, a Conditional Use Permit, and Planning Application No. PA17-1613, a Development Plan, (Collectively, “Application”), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on December 19, 2018, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA17-1614, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that in accordance with Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.04.010.E (Conditional Use Permit): A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. Restaurants with drive-thrus, as conditioned, are an allowable use within the Community Commercial General Plan. Therefore, the use is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures, and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures as the project site is located within an existing commercial center and is bordered by two public streets. A Traffic and Circulation Analysis was prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan which detailed that a drive-through lane to accommodate a minimum of 13 vehicles is adequate for any queueing scenario associated the with drive-through window operation. C.The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The project will allow for a drive-thru restaurant to be constructed at this location. The site will remain adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code as required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The previous development on the project site was an automotive oil change facility. The proposed project is drive-thru restaurant establishment that is not expected to result in any significant effects compared to the previous development. As conditioned, the project will meet all requirements of the Development Code, General Plan, and Fire and Building Codes which provided safeguards for the health, safety and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to conditionally approve or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the application for a Conditional Use Permit has been based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 4. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects). (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because drive-thru restaurants are a conditionally allowable use within the Community Commercial district. The project also meets all applicable General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 0.66 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by commercial and residential buildings as well as major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project site is currently a fully developed site with an existing commercial building and paved parking lot. The project proposes to demolish the existing structure and construct a new structure. Therefore, the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A Traffic and Circulation Analysis was prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan which detailed that a drive-through lane to accommodate a minimum of 13 vehicles is adequate for any queueing scenario associated the with drive-through window operation. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project, as conditioned, is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. Section 5. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA17-1614, a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an approximately 1,850 square foot drive-thru Starbucks located at 30690 Rancho California Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of December, 2018. Gary Youmans, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary \[SEAL\] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 18- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of December, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA17-1614 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an approximately 1,850 square foot drive-thru Starbucks located in the Palomar Village Shopping Center at 30690 Rancho California Road. 921-700-005 Assessor's Parcel No.: Commercial MSHCP Category: Service Commercial (credit for existing building to be determined) DIF Category: TUMF Category: Service Commercial/Office (credit for existing building to be determined) Quimby Category: N/A (non-residential project) N/A (project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) New Street In-lieu of Fee: Approval Date: December 19, 2018 December 19, 2020 Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements 1.Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, f advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters o the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 2.Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. 3.Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one year extensions of time, one year at a time. 4.Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 5.Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 6.Statement of Operations. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations on file with the Planning Division, unless a conflict exists between the Statement of Operations and these Conditions of Approval, in which case the Conditions of Approval control. 7.Revocation of CUP. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City’s Development Code. 8.City Review and Modification of CUP. The City, its Director of Community Development, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Director of Community Development, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in-lieu of, the right of the City, its Director of Community Development, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PC DRAFT RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA17-1613, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 1,850 SQUARE FOOT DRIVE-THRU STARBUCKS LOCATED AT 30690 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 14, 2017, Jeff Herbst filed Planning Application No. PA17- 1613, a Development Plan, and Planning Application No. PA17-1614, a Conditional Use Permit, (Collectively, “Application”), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on December 19, 2018, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA17-1613, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that in accordance with Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.05.010.F (Development Plan): A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The General Plan designation for the project site is Community Commercial, which allows for a drive-thru restaurant, as conditioned. Therefore, the proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Development Code, and Fire and Building Codes. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because drive-thru restaurants are a conditionally allowable use within the Community Commercial district. The project also meets all applicable General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 0.66 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by commercial and residential buildings as well as major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project site is currently a fully developed site with an existing commercial building and paved parking lot. The project proposes to demolish the existing structure and construct a new structure. Therefore, the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A Traffic and Circulation Analysis was prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan which detailed that a drive-through lane to accommodate a minimum of 13 vehicles is adequate for any queueing scenario associated the with drive-through window operation. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project, as conditioned, is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA17-1613, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 1,850 square foot drive-thru Starbucks located at 30690 Rancho California Road, and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of December, 2018. Gary Youmans, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary \[SEAL\] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 18- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of December, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA17-1613 Project Description: A Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 1,850 square foot drive-thru Starbucks located in the Palomar Village Shopping Center at 30690 Rancho California Road. 921-700-005 Assessor's Parcel No.: Commercial MSHCP Category: Service Commercial (credit for existing building to be determined) DIF Category: TUMF Category: Service Commercial/Office (credit for existing building to be determined) Quimby Category: N/A (non-residential project) N/A (project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) New Street In-lieu of Fee: Approval Date: December 19, 2018 December 19, 2021 Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval 1.Filing Notice of Exemption. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty f Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice o Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2.Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3.Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. 4.Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. 5.Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 6.Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 7.Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 8. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 9.Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 10.Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Color Paint Site White (SW7070) Paint Lazy Gray (SW6254) Paint Winchester Gray (SW2849) Paint White Flour (SW7102) Metal Canopy Black Magic (SW6991) Tile Asian Black (Daltile) Windows Clear #14 (Kawneer) Metal Trim/Cornice Black Magic (SW6991) 11. r Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications o revisions to the approval of this project. 12.Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 13.Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 14.Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid 15. waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 16.Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in Section 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, 17. landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit 18.Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 19.Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 20.Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community f Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum o money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director.” 21.Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 22.Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 23.Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 24.Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 25.Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 26.Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 27.Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 28.Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 29.Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 30.Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 31.Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 32.Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 33.Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 34.Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 35.WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 36.Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 37.Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 38.Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 39.Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 40.Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 41.Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Outside Agencies 42.Compliance with Southern California Edison. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Southern California Edison transmittal dated May 4, 2018, a copy of which is attached. 43.Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District’s transmittal dated December 26, 2017, a copy of which is attached. 44.Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Geotechnical Consultant's (Leighton Consulting) transmittal dated March 1, 2018, a copy of which is attached. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 45.Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 46.Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 47.Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 48.Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from: a. Public Works for public offsite improvements; and b. Southern California Gas Company, and c. affected agencies. 49.Storm Drain Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit storm drain improvement plans if the street storm flows exceeds top of curb for the 10-year storm event and/or is not contained within the street right-of-way for the 100-year storm event. A manhole shall be constructed at right-of-way where a private and public storm drain systems connect. The plans shall be approved by Public Works. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 50.Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 51.Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable purveyors and agencies. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & 52. sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 53.Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 54.NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: r a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Wate Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 55.Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link below: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed 56. development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 57.Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 58.Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 59.Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 60.Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) 61.Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane 62. closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 63.Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 64.Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 65.Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 66.Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 67.Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 68.Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements 69.Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 70.Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2016 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2016 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2016 California Energy Codes, 2016 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code. 71.ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 72.County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 73. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 74.Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 75.Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 76.Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 77.Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. 78.Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 79.Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 80.House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. f Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation o exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 81. Protection of drains and penetration. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire resistance-rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire resistant penetrations shall be installed by individuals with classification or certification covering the installation of these systems. Provide certification for the installation of each area and certification of compliance for Building Official's approval. At Plan Review Submittal 82.Submitting Plans and Calculations. Applicant must submit to Building and Safety four (4) complete sets of plans and two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review and approval including: a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work. b. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. c. Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 83.Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval. 84.Demolition Permits. A demolition permit shall be obtained if there is an existing structure to be removed as part of the project. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 85.Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction 86.Pre-Construction Meeting. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements 87.Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 88.Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by “would-be burglars.” Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 89.Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 90.Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 91.Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 92.Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 93.Outdoor Lighting During Non-Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor’s order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non-business hours. The order, in part, states, “All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property.” Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 94.Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or 95. painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 96.Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. 97. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted “International Orange.” 98.Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 99.Public Telephones. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well-lit, highly visible area, and installed with a “call-out only” feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. 100. ADA Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 101. Employee Training. Employee training regarding retail/credit card theft, citizens’ arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit. 102. Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. The applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. 103. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that “the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life.” The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children’s play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 104. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951) 695-2773. 105. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA17-1613, PA17-1614 Applicant: Jeff Herbst Proposal:A Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an approximately 1,850 square foot drive-thru Starbucks located at 30690 Rancho California Road Environmental:In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects) Case Planner: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 Place of Hearing: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590,City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: December 19, 2018 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.