HomeMy WebLinkAbout042303 PC Agenda In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,1
please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the!
City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
APRIL 23, 2003 - 6:00 P.M.
Next In Order:
Resolution: No. 2003-017
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute: Commissioner Olhasso
Roll Call: Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio and Chiniaeff
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item no.~t on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary. "
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar ai;~'c°nSld~r~d to be rOUtine and all wili
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discUssion of these Items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific Items be removed from the
~ Consent Calendar for separate action.
1 Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of April 23, 2003
R:~PLANCOMM~Agendas~.003~04-23-O3.doc
1
· 2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2,1 Approve the Minutes of April 9, 2003
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Ex Parte Communications
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Continued from April 9, 2003
3 Planninq Application No. PA02-0334 To desi.qn, construct, and operate a 27,706 square foot
two-stow office buildin.q located on Jefferson Avenue and north of Via Montezuma, Rick
Rush, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0334 pursuant to
Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA02-0334, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
. ESTABLISH_AND ~O._ _P_E_R_ _ATE__A 27_,706 SQUARE F.0_O_T OFE!C_E ._.
'BUILDING ON 1.67 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY,LOCATED
ON JEFFERSON AVENUE AND NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA·
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-400:037
4 Plannin.q Application No. PA02-0652 A Vestinq Tentative Parcel Map located on the south
side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Rancho California·
Road / Moraqa Intersection, Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
. . R:~ LANCO M bl~a~gend~s~oOO3~O4.23.03.doc
2
4.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-
0652 (Vesting Tentative Parcel Map) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California
Environmental Quality Act;
4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0652, AN
EIGHT LOT VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST
OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012, 013,014.
5 Plannin.q Application No. PA02-0620 To construct, establish and operate an 8,100 square
foot multi-tenant retail buildinq on 1.01 acres located within the Bel Villaqio shoppinq center,
west of Marqarita Road, 470 linear feet south of the Mall Access Road and North General
Kearney Road intersection, Rolfe Preisendanz
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 .Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-
0620 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental
Quality Act;
5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA02-0620, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE AN 8,100 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-
TENANT RETAIL BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES, GENERALLY
LOCATED WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, 470 LINEAR FEET
SOUTH OF THE MALL ACCESS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD INTERSECTION AND ALSO
- KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-090-063, 071,072
AND 078.
New Items
6 Planninq Application No. PA02-0460 To construct a multi-tenant industrial buildin(~ totalin(i
17,350 square feet on a .99-acre parcel located on the south side of Winchester Road
approximately 850 feet west of Diaz Road, Dan Lonq, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION: .,
R:~ LANC0 M M',Agendas~2003~04-23~O3.doc
3
6.1' Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0460 (Development
Plan) pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING 'PLANNING APPLICATION
NO,' PA02-0460, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A
MULTI-TENANT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING TOTALING 17,350
SQUARE FEET. THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 850
FEET WEST OF DIAZ ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS
PARCEL NO. 909-310-007
7 'Plannin.q Application No. PA02-0698 To construct, establish and operate an apartment
complex consistin.q of 21 multi-family residential buildings, one mixed-use buildin.q and a
leasinq center totalinq 426,922 square feet and an exception to the development standards
to reduce the onsite parkinq requirements by 31 spaces located on the northwest corner of
Mar.qarita Road and Harveston Way, Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-
0698 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental
Quality Act;
7.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
'CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
. NO. PA02~0698, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH' AND OPERATE AN APARTMENT COMPLEX
CONSISTING OF 300 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DWELLING UNITS ON A 16.5 ACRE SITE WITHIN .THE
HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY. 'THE SITE 'IS'
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
MARGARITA ROAD AND HARVESTON WAY ALSO KNOWN
AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 916-170-026,046, 047, 048,
049, 050.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT .
ADJOURNMENT rNext meeting:. May 71 2003 ~ Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
R:~PLANCOMM'~gendas~2003~4-23-O3,doc
4
ITEM #2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 9, 2003
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:06
P.M., on Wednesday, April 9, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Chairman Chiniaeff.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Mathewson, Telesio, and Chairman
Chiniaeff.
Absent: Guerriero and Olhasso.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 A.qenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of April 9, 2003.
(Item No. 5 was continued to May 7, 2003, and Item Nos. 6, 7, and 8 were continued to
April 23, 2003.)
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of March 19, 2003.
3 Director's Hearinq Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for March 2003.
R: PlanningCommission~ninutes~040903 1
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-
3 (amending Item No. 1 - see page 1). The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioners
Guerriero and Olhasso who were absent.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
There was no Commission Business.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
4 Planning Application No. PA02-0426 To establish a siqn pro.qram for Etco Plaza, a
shoppinq center consistin.q of two buildin.qs located at 27270 Madison Avenue
(Continued from March 19, 2003)
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-016
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA02-0426, TO ESTABLISH A
SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE ETCO PLAZA
DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON
AVENUE ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NUMBERS 910-272-005 & 006
Highlighting the Planning Commission's previous modifications (March 19, 2003) to the
requested sign pregrem, Associate Planner Harris reviewed the staff report (as per
agenda material). It was noted that since that time, the applicant has revised the sign
program, however, not all the recommendations or determinations of the Commission
have been made. The following is a summary of the sign program modifications
requested by the Commission versus what the applicant has provided (noting the
applicant was not in attendance).
· That, as per the Commission, there be one sign on the east and
west sides of each building;
o The applicant's request--modified the sign program
accordingly, however, requesting three location options
for the primary tenant sign;
o Staff would recommend that the signs be located
underneath the prominent arched roof elements of the
buildings which represents the most appropriate location
based on the buildings architectutural features.
Therefore, staff would recommend that the two permitted
R: PlanningComrnission~mlnutes~040903 2
primary tenant signs be limited to these locations on each
building and that the sign program be modified
accordingly.
SECOND FLOOR SIGNS
The Commission determined that one secondary tenant sized
sign may be allowed on the north and south side of each building
provided there was one second-story tenant; if there were more
than one second-story tenant, no second-story signs would be
permitted.
o The applicant's request---one secondary tenant sign on
the east and west elevations, not the north and south
elevations. If the tenant were to occupy at least 50% of
the second floor.
o Staff stated that the applicant's request would result in an
excessive amount of signage on the east and west
elevations and would detract from the amhitectural
features. Therefore, staff would recommend that the
second-story signage provisions, outlined by the Planning
Commission, be maintained and that the sign program be
revised accordingly.
GROUND FLOOR SIGNS
· The Commission determined that there be one ground floor sign
for each secondary tenant on the east and west elevation for
each building per tenant (maximum 4);
· That if a tenant were to occupy two spaces or more, only one
ground floor sign may be granted;
· That the applicant concurred with the proposed recommendation
as it relates to ground floor sign for each secondary tenant on the
east and west elevation; but with regard to the multiple space
issue, the applicant would be requesting, in lieu of a ground floor
sign, another sign on the second-story.
LOGO SIGNS
· The Planning Commission determined that no logo sign should
be allowed on the building;
o The applicant's request to permit Iogos;
o Staff would recommend that the sign program be modified
to reflect the Commission's decision.
R: PlanningCommission~inutes\040903 3
MONUMENT SIGNS
· The Commission determined that two proposed freestanding
monument signs along the Madison Avenue frontage were
appropriate as proposed;
o The applicant's request--to relocate the originally
proposed Freestanding Multi-Tenant Identification Signs
adjacent to the two site driveways;
o Staff has no objection to the revised sign locations
provided the signs comply with the sight visibility
requirements;
o Staff has determined that the proposed sign program for
Etco Plaza Development, as conditioned, does comply
with all applicable sign standards identified in the
Development Code. Subsequently, staff would
recommend that the sign program be approved as
conditioned.
Mr. James P. Brass, 1749 E. 28th Street Signal Hill, representing the applicant, Sign
Methods, Inc., reiterated the multi-space issue, requesting one secondary tenant sign
be located on the second-story of both the east and west elevations of each building to
identify a second-story tenant that occupies at least 50% of the second floor space.
Commissioner Mathewson noted that significant changes are being proposed by the
applicant, stating that the proposed changes would result in more signage on the west
and east sides of the building, that he would support staff's recommendation, and
reiterating his desire to follow the proposed font style.
Addressing the multiple-space issue on the second floor, it was noted by Commissioner
Telesio that the intent of the signs on the north and south ends of the building was for a
tenant occupying the entire second floor (100%) that there would be no aesthetic
impact or a change in total number of signs per building if such signs were granted to
tenant occupying 51% or more.
Recapitulating the Planning Commission's decision, Commissioner Mathewson clarified
the total number of allowable signs per building: one primary sign on the west and east
sides (two); ground floor signs (8); and a secondary sign on the north or south side
(one); plus the monument sign.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Associate Planner Harris clarified No. 13 of the design
guidelines (Banners, Pennants and Balloons used for advertising purposes) with the
Planning Commission concurring to not permit such usage.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve staff's recommendation as
amended as follows:
· Secondary signage on the second floor to grant a tenant occupying 51% or
more of the second floor a secondary sign on the north and south ends;
R: PlanningCommlsslon~minutes~040903 4
· Maximum number of signs on each building 11 which would include one
secondary floor sign on the north and south ends of the building;
· That No. 13 of the design guidelines (Banners, Pennants and Balloons) be
stricken.
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Commissioners Guerriero and Olhasso who were
absent.
5 Planninq Application No. PA02-0340 To establish a Comprehensive Land Use Plan
in association with a future retail commemial shoppinq center located on the
southeast and southwest corners of Pechanqa Parkway and State Highway 79
South
(Continued from March 19, 2003)
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Requesting a continuance to April 23, 2003
(Continued to May 7, 2003; see page 1 .)
6 Planninq Application No. PA02-0334 To desiqn, construct, and operate a 27,706
square foot two-story office building located on Jefferson Avenue and north of Via
Montezuma
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0334 pursuant
to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE cI'rY OF TEUECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA02-0334, A DEVELOPMENT
PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A
27,706 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.67
VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON
JEFFERSON AVENUE AND NORTH OF VIA
MONTEZUMA KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.
921-4OO-O37
(Continued to April 23, 2003; see page 1 .)
R: PlannlngCommission~lnutes~040903 5
7 Plannin.q Application No. PA02-0652 A Vestinq Tentative Parcel Map located on the
south side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Rancho
California Road / Mora,qa Intersection
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No.
PA02-0652 (Vesting Tentative Parcel Map) pursuant to Section 15162 of the
California Environmental Quality Act;
7.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMblENDING CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA02-0652, AN EIGHT LOT VESTING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC
ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-
012, 013,014.
(Continued to April 23, 2003; see page 1 .)
8 Plannin.q Application No. PA02-0620 To construct, establish and operate an 8,100
square foot multi-tenant retail buildinq on 1.01 acres located within the Bel Villaqio
shoppinq center, west of Marqarita Road, 470 linear feet south of the Mall Access
Road and North General Kearney Road intersection
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No.
PA02-0620 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California
Environmental Quality Act
8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R'. PlanningCommission~minutes~040903 6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA02-0620, A DEVELOPMENT
PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE
AN 8,100 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-TENANT RETAIL
BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED
WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, 470 LINEAR FEET
SOUTH OF THE MALL ACCESS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD INTERSECTION AND
ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-
090-063, 071,072 AND 078.
(Continued to April 23, 2003; see page 1 .)
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
A. Having attended the American Planning Association (APA) Conference in
Denver, Colorado, Chairman Chiniaeff advised that it was applicant productive and that
next years will be in Washington, D.C.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
Planning Director Ubnoske advised that the second interviews for the Associate
Planner position have been scheduled and noted that Assistant Planner Preisendanz
has tendered his resignation and that staff has interviewed consultants to prepare
design guidelines.
Commissioner Telesio readdressed Ex-Parte Communication with Assistant City
Attorney Curley providing an updated version of the Planning Commission's Handbook.
Planning Director Ubnoske noted that the Ex-Parte communication topic would
Be placed on a future Planning Commission Agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular meetin.q to be
held on Wednesda¥~ April 23~ 2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, and Temecula.
Dennis W. Chiniaeff, Debbie Ubnoske,
Chairman Director of Planning
R: PlanningCommlssion~mlnutes~)40903 7
Final Map, CC meeting May 13
1. Bill Curley to provide comments on April 10th.
2. PW Preliminary Comments are done.
3. PW and Planning to meet to consolidate comments April 17, 11:00 AM
4. TCSD and Planning to meet to consolidate comments April 17, 1:00 PM
5. Saied to provide consolidated redlined comments from the City excluding
Bill Curley's comments, which were already provided, to
smuldowney@coxcastle.com (applicant's attorney) by April 18th 5:00 PM
or sooner.
6. Applicant to resubmit redlined CC &Rs to Saied and Bill Curley by email
and hard copies of the exhibits if not possible through email by April 21,
7:00 AM.
7. Planning, PW, and TCSD to meet to consolidate City comments excluding
City Attorney on April 23, 2:00 PM
8. Saied to provide consolidated comments to smuldowne¥@coxcastle.com
by April 24, 5:00 PM.
9. Bill Curley to provide comments by April 24, 5:00 PM to
smuldowney @ coxcastle.com directly.
10. Saied to also review and provide comments, if any, on all documents that
provide compliance with the Conditions of Approval and Mitigation
Monitoring Program by April 24, 5:00 PM (excluding CC & Rs).
11. TCSD to provide clearance on the Conditions of Approval and Mitigation
Monitoring Program on the recordation of the final map to PW by April 24,
5:00 PM (excluding CC & Rs)
12. Applicant to submit redlined CC & Rs to Saied by April 28th, 7:00 AM.
13. Planning, TCSD, PW to meet to finalize the CC & Rs April 29, 10:00 AM
14. Saied smuldowne¥@coxcastle.com to finalize the CC &Rs by April 29th,
5:00 PM.
15.Bill Curley to finalize the CC & Rs by April 29, 5:00 PM and coordinate
with smuldowney@coxcastle.com directly.
R:\S P\Roripaugh Ranch SP~ew\OS and Final Map Schedule.doc
Open Space Agreement, CC May 13
1. Kevin to provide redlined comments to Saied by April 18th, 7:00 AM (Bill
Curley already provided a copy of the Agreement to the applicant;
however, Bill should send an electronic version for the applicant to
redline).
2. Bill Curley to provide Saied a re-draft by April 23, 1:00 PM.
3. Staff (Shawn, Gary, Debbie, Ron Parks, Kathy, Herman, and Saied) to
meet with Bill Curley on April 23, 1:00 PM to review the new draft.
4. Bill Curley to provide Kevin a re-draft by April 24, 5:00 PM.
5. Kevin to provide redlined comments to Saied by April 28, 7:00 AM.
6. Saied, Bill Curley, and Kevin to finalize the Agreement by April 29t~, 5:00
PM.
7. Saied will write the Staff Report due to Gary and Debbie by May 1.
R:\S PLRoripaugh Ranch SPXnew\OS and Final Map Schedule.doc
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 9, 2003
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:06
P.M., on Wednesday, April 9, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Chairman Chiniaeff.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Mathewson, Telesio, and Chairman
Chiniaeff.
Absent: Guerriero and Olhasso.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 A.qenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of April 9, 2003.
(Item No. 5 was continued to May 7, 2003, and Item Nos. 6, 7, and 8 were continued to
April 23, 2003.)
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of March 19, 2003.
3 Director's Hearinq Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for March 2003.
R: PlanningCommission~qtlnutes~040903 1
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-
3 (amending Item No. 1 - see page 1). The motion was seconded by Commissibner
Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioners
Guerriero and Olhasso who were .absent.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
There was no Commission Business.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
4 Planninq Application No. PA02-0426 To establish a siqn proqram for Etco Plaza, a
shoppin,q center consistin,q of two buildinqs located at 27270 Madison Avenue
(Continued from March 19, 2003)
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-016
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA02-0426, TO ESTABLISH A
SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE ETCO PLAZA
DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON
AVENUE ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NUMBERS 910-272-005 & 006
Highlighting the Planning Commission's previous modifications (March 19, 2003) to the
requested sign program, Associate Planner Harris reviewed the staff report (as per
agenda material). It was noted that since that time, the applicant has revised the sign
program, however, not all the recommendations or determinations of the Commission
have been made. The following is a summary of the sign program modifications
requested by the Commission versus what the applicant has provided (noting the
applicant was not in attendance).
· That, as per the Commission, there be one sign on the east and
west sides of each building;
o The applicant's request---modified the sign program
accordingly, however, requesting three location options
for the primary tenant sign;
o Staff would recommend that the signs be located
underneath the prominent arched roof elements of the
buildings which represents the most appropriate location
based on the buildings architectutural features.
Therefore, staff would recommend that the two permitted
R: PlanningCornmission~minutes\040903 2
primary tenant signs be limited to these locations on each
building and that the sign program be modified
accordingly.
SECOND FLOOR SIGNS
· The Commission determined that one secondary tenant sized
sign may be allowed on the north and south side of each building
provided there was one second-story tenant; if there were more
than one second-story tenant, no second-story signs would be
permitted.
o The applicant's request--one secondary tenant sign on
the east and west elevations, not the north and south
elevations. If the tenant were to occupy at least 50% of
the second floor.
o Staff stated that the applicant's request would result in an
excessive amount of signage on the east and west
elevations and would detract from the amhitectural
features. Therefore, staff would recommend that the
second-story signage provisions, outlined by the Planning
Commission, be maintained and that the sign program be
revised accordingly.
GROUND FLOOR SIGNS
· The Commission determined that there be one ground floor sign
for each secondary tenant on the east and west elevation for
each building per tenant (maximum 4);
· That if a tenant were to occupy two spaces or more, only one
ground floor sign may be granted;
· That the applicant concurred with the proposed recommendation
as it relates to ground floor sign for each secondary tenant on the
east and west elevation; but with regard to the multiple space
issue, the applicant would be requesting, in lieu of a ground floor
sign, another sign on the second-story.
LOGO SIGNS
· The Planning Commission determined that no logo sign should
be allowed on the building;
o The applicant's request to permit Iogos;
o Staff would recommend that the sign program be modified
to reflect the Commission's decision.
R: PlanningCommission~minutes~040903 3
MONUMENT SIGNS
· The Commission determined that two proposed freestanding
monument signs along the Madison Avenue frontage were
appropriate as proposed;
o The applicant's request--to relocate the originally
proposed Freestanding Multi-Tenant Identification Signs
adjacent to the two site driveways;
o Staff has no objection to the revised sign locations
provided the signs comply with the sight visibility
requirements;
o Staff has determined that the proposed sign program for
Etco Plaza Development, as conditioned, does comply
with all applicable sign standards identified in the
Development Code. Subsequently, staff would
recommend that the sign program be approved as
conditioned.
Mr. James P. Brass, 1749 E. 28~ Street Signal Hill, representing the applicant, Sign
Methods, Inc., reiterated the multi-space issue, requesting one secondary tenant sign
be located on the second-story of both the east and west elevations of each building to
identify a second-story tenant that occupies at least 50% of the second floor space.
Commissioner Mathewson noted that significant changes are being proposed by the
applicant, stating that the proposed changes would result in more signage on the west
and east sides of the building, that he would support staff's recommendation, and
reiterating his desire to follow the proposed font style.
Addressing the multiple-space issue on the second floor, it was noted by Commissioner
Telesio that the intent of the signs on the north and south ends of the building was for a
tenant occupying the entire second floor (100%) that there would be no aesthetic
impact or a change in total number of signs per building if such signs were granted to
tenant occupying 51% or more.
Recapitulating the Planning Commission's decision, Commissioner Mathewson clarified
the total number of allowable signs per building: one primary sign on the west and east
sides (two); ground floor signs (8); and a secondary sign on the north or south side
(one); plus the monument sign.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Associate Planner Harris clarified No. 13 of the design
guidelines (Banners, Pennants and Balloons used for advertising purposes) with the
Planning Commission concurring to not permit such usage.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve staff's recommendation as
amended as follows:
· Secondary signage on the second floor to grant a tenant occupying 51% or
more of the second floor a secondary sign on the north and south ends;
R: PlannlngCommisslon~mlnutes\040903 4
· Maximum number of signs on each building 11 which would include one
secondary floor sign on the north and south ends of the building;
· That No. 13 of the design guidelines (Banners, Pennants and Balloons) be
stricken.
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Commissioners Guerriero and Olhasso who were
absent.
5 Planning Application No. PA02-0340 To establish a Comprehensive Land Use Plan
in association with a future retail commemial shoppin.q center located on the
southeast and southwest comers of Pechanqa Parkway and State Hi.qhway 79
South
(Continued from March 19, 2003)
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Requesting a continuance to April 23, 2003
(Continued to May 7, 2003; see page 1 .)
6 Planninq Application No. PA02-0334 To design, construct, and operate a 27,706
square foot two-story office building located on Jefferson Avenue and north of Via
Montezuma
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0334 pursuant
to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA02-0334, A DEVELOPMENT
PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A
27,706 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.67
VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON
JEFFERSON AVENUE AND NORTH OF VIA
MONTEZUMA KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.
921-400-037
(Continued to April 23, 2003; see page 1.)
R: PlanningCommission~ninutes\040903 5
7 Planninq Application No. PA02-0652 A Vestinq Tentative Parcel Map located on the
south side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Rancho
California Road / Moraqa Intersection
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No.
PA02-0652 (Vesting Tentative Parcel Map) pursuant to Section 15162 of the
California Environmental Quality Act;
7.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA02-0652, AN EIGHT LOT VESTING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC
ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-
012, 013,014.
(Continued to April 23, 2003; see page 1 .)
8 Planninq Application No. PA02-0620 To construct, establish and operate an 8,100
square foot multi-tenant retail buildin.q on 1.01 acres located within the Bel Villaqio
shoppin.q center, west of Marqarita Road, 470 linear feet south of the Mall Access
Road and North General Kearney Road intersection
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No.
PA02-0620 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California
Environmental Quality Act
8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R: PlanningCommission~minutes~040903 6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA02-0620, A DEVELOPMENT
PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE
AN 8,100 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-TENANT RETAIL
BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED
WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, 470 LINEAR FEET
SOUTH OF THE MALL ACCESS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD INTERSECTION AND
ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-
090-063, 071,072 AND 078.
(Continued to April 23, 2003; see page 1.)
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
A. Having attended the American Planning Association (APA) Conference in
Denver, Colorado, Chairman Chiniaeff advised that it was applicant productive and that
next years will be in Washington, D.C.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
Planning Director Ubnoske advised that the second interviews for the Associate
Planner position have been scheduled and noted that Assistant Planner Preisendanz
has tendered his resignation and that staff has interviewed consultants to prepare
design guidelines.
Commissioner Telesio readdressed Ex-Parte Communication with Assistant City
Attorney Curley providing an updated version of the Planning Commission's Handbook.
Planning Director Ubnoske noted that the Ex-Parte communication topic would
Be placed on a future Planning Commission Agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular meetin.q to be
held on Wednesday~ April 23~ 2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, and Temecula.
Dennis W. Chiniaeff, Debbie Ubnoske,
Chairman Director of Planning
R: PlanningCommisslon~mlnutes\040903 7
ITEM #3
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 23, 2003
Planning Application No. PA02-0334 (Development Plan)
· Prepared By: Rick Rush, Associate Planner
1. ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0334 pursuant to Section
15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA02-0334, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 27,706 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE
BUILDING ON 1.67 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON
JEFFERSON AVENUE AND NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-400-037
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Diamond Central Investors
PROPOSAL: Planning Application to design, construct, and operate a
27,706 square foot two-story office building
LOCATION: Located on Jefferson Avenue and north of Via Montezuma
EXISTING ZONING: Community Commercial (CC)
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Community Commercial (CC)
South: Community Commercial (CC)
East: Service Commercial (SC)
West: Community Commercial (CC)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial (CC)
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Hotel
South: Office Buildings
East: Automobile Dealership
West: Office Buildings
R:~D PL2002\02~0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot area (gross): 72,560 (1.67 acres)
Lot area (net) 64,189 (1.47 acres)
Building square footage: 27,706 square feet
Building height: 38'-0"
Landscaped area: 19,997 square feet (27.6%)
Parking required: 90 vehicular, 4 handicapped, 4 bicycle, and 4 motorcycle
Parking provided: 90 vehicular, 5 handicapped, 4 bicycle, and 4 motorcycle
Lot coverage: 19.7%
Floor area ratio: .38
Target floor area ratio: .30
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted the application for review on June 21, 2002. A Development Review
Meeting was held on August 8, 2002, and as a result of this meeting the applicant was furnished a
detailed list of revisions required for the project. The applicant addressed all of the revisions and
resubmitted on December 6, 2002. After resubmitting, the applicant requested a meeting with staff
to discuss the possibility of increasing the square footage of the building from 21,870 square feet to
27,706 square feet. It was agreed that staff would support the increased square footage because of
the exceptional architecture and landscaping being proposed.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Planning Application No. 02-0334 is a request to construct a 27,706 square foot two-story
speculative office building located on a 1.67-acre site. The proposed floor area ratio of .38 exceeds
the target floor area ratio for the Community Commercial zoning district of .30. As a part of the
application the applicant is requesting an increase in the Floor Area Ratio. The project is located on
Jefferson Avenue north of Via Montezuma. The proposed building will be located on a vacant lot
within the existing Jefferson Plaza complex. Access to the site is taken from Jefferson Avenue via a
forty-foot wide joint use driveway. The proposed parking for the site is located along the north and
south elevations of the building.
The building will be constructed utilizing steel framing with mini-brick veneers mounted to the
exterior of the building. The applicant is proposing to screen the mechanical equipment with sheet
metal panels finished with silver factory applied finish. The factory finish will also be applied to the
horizontal metal elements, break metal elements between the windows, aluminum storefront system,
overhead canopy, and the pilaster caps. The front entry has been located along the north elevation
directly adjacent to the main parking field.
Along the east property line the applicant is proposing to provide two separate carport structures.
The carports are to be constructed utilizing steel framing painted to match the silver factory finish
R:'d) P~002\02~)334 Jefferson Avenue Building,Staff Report.doc
2
and brick veneers. The proposed trash enclosure will be constructed with split-face masonry and a
metal fascia finished with the silver factory finish.
The applicant is providing 19,997 square feet of landscaping, which is twenty eight percent of the
entire site. The applicant has provided an employee lunch area along the west elevation of the
building. The applicant has provided a decorative entry statement along the main entrance to the
building. Included in this area is a combination of color concrete paving with a light broom finish,
and three queen palm trees.
ANALYSIS
Staff can make the required findings necessary to approve a two-story office building located in the
Community Commercial zoning district and supports the requested increase in the floor area ratio.
The floor area ratio for the project is .38, which exceeds the target .30 for the Community
Commercial zoning district. The Code offers incentives to increase the floor area ratio to 1.0, ifthe
applicant can meet at least one of the following criteria (Section 17.08.050):
1. The project includes use(s), which provide outstanding and exceptional benefits to the city
with respect to the employment, fiscal, social and economic needs of the community.
2. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscaping design amenities, which
reflect an attractive image and character to the city.
3. The project provides enhanced public facilities that are needed by the city, beyond those
required mitigation impact measures.
Staff has determined that the proposed building architectura provides exceptional architecture and
meets criteria number two as stated above. The proposed building design exceeds the architectural
standards of the Development Code and the architectural policies in the City-Wide Design
Guidelines. The creative radial entry statement being proposed by the applicant not only exceeds
the requirement for offering an interesting entry statement, it also helps to vary the building shape.
The entry statement provides a prominent entry point to the proposed building utilizing a
combination of storefront glass, brick, silver factory finished metal, decorative paving and
landscaping. The proposed architecture and building materials in some respects, exceeds the level
of quality of the existing buildings within the Jefferson Plaza.
The proposed landscaping exceeds the minimum requirements of the Development Code and
complements the architectural design theme. The entire building is surrounded by landscaping
except for the areas designated as entry points to the building. The landscaping and decorative
paving located at the building's main entrance is a quality design, and which serves as a prominent
entry statement as well as an area for visitors to congregate. The employee lunch area along the
west building elevation creates an area for employees, as well as visitors to the building, a shaded
area to enjoy lunch or relax.
Due to grade differences between the parking lot and Interstate 15, the carports will not be visible
along the freeway. The proposed materials for the carports are consistent with the materials utilized
on the proposed building. Staff has determined that the structures will be a quality addition to the
project.
The pr(~posed site planning and circulation is consistent with the commercial development
performance standards in the Development Code. The proposed site plan has eliminated any
conflicts between pedestrian and vehicular traffic by locating the pedestrian access parallel with the
vehicular access and by providing sidewalks along the building elevations that lead to all of the
R:~D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
3
building entrances. The required loading spaces have been located to along the north elevation of
the building and will not be visible from the public right of way. The drive aisles provided are a
minimum twenty-four feet wide, and the applicant has provided a hammerhead turnaround on site to
allow fire trucks to cimulate on site.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project is exempt from environmental review based on Section 15332 (In-Fill Development
Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and there are no potentially significant
environmental constraints on the site. The project qualifies for a Class 32 infill development
exemption because the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning
regulations; is located on a site within the city limits, which is served by all utilities; and is less than 5
acres in area.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City's Design
Guidelines, and conforms to all of the applicable development regulations. Staff recommends
approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Floor Area Ratio Increase (Section 17.08.050)
1. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscaping design amenities, which
reflect an attractive image and character to the city.
The proposed building architecture provides exceptional architecture and landscaping
design amenities. The entry statement provides a prominent entry point to the proposed
building utilizing a combination of storefront glass, brfck, silver factory finished metal,
decorative paving and landscaping. The entire building is surrounded by landscaping
except for the areas designated as entry points to the building. The landscaping and
decorative paving located at the building's main entrance is a quality design, which serves
as a prominent entry statement as well as an area for visitors to congregate.
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as
the development standards for Community Commercial (CC) zoning district in the City of
Temecula Development Code. An office building is a typical land use found in the
Community Commercial land use designation within the General Plan. The Land Use
Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatibility with existing
buildings. The proposed office use is compatible with the professional office buildings
currently located on the proposed site.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
R:XD PX2002\02-03343cfferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
4
The architecture proposed forthe office building exceeds the Architectural requirements as
stated in the Design Guidelines and the Commercial Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The proposed building architecture and building materials have been
found to be compatible with the adjacent office build~hgs. The proposed entry statement is
an exceptionally creative entry statement, which exceeds the Development Code
requirements. The varying building shapes and offsets provided serve to break up the
massing of the building. The project has been reviewed against the Community Design
Element goals and policies found in the General Plan and have been found to exceed the
goals and policies. Policy 1.3 requires that design standards be put in place to enhance the
visual character of commercial centers that are adjacent to Interstate 15. The proposed
architecture enhances the visual character along Interstate 15 and will be a welcome
addition to the existing office buildings.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that
the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety and welfare.
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
2. Exhibits dated April 9, 2003 - Blue Page 22
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Building Elevations
G. Floor Plan
H. Landscape Plan
I. Color Material Board
R:q) Px2002\02-0334/e fferson Avenue BuildingXStaff Repotl.doc
5
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-.
R:XD PX2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue BuildingXStaff Report.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0334, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH
AND OPERATE A 27,706 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON
1.67 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON JEFFERSON
AVENUE AND NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-400-037
WHEREAS, Diamond Central Investors, filed Planning Application No. 02-0334
(Development Plan Application), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 23, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as proscribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission rocommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations aro true and corroct and are heroby incorporated
by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Sections Section 17.08.050 and 17.05.01 OF of the
Temecula Municipal Code:
1. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscaping design amenities,
which reflect an attractive image and character to the city.
The proposed building architecture provides exceptional architecture and landscaping
design amenities. The entry statement provides a prominent entry point to the proposed
building utilizing a combination of storefront glass, brick, silver factory finished metal,
decorative paving and landscaping. The entire building is surrounded by landscaping
except for the areas designated as entry points to the building. The landscaping and
decorative paving located at the building's main entrance is a quality design, which serves
as a prominent entry statement as well as an area for visitors to congregate.
2. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
R:'~D ~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
7
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as
the development standards for Community Commercial (CC) zoning district in the City of
Temecula Development Code. An office building is a typical/and use found in the
Community Commercial land use designation within the General Plan. The Land Use
Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatibility with existing
buildings. The proposed office use/$ compatible with the professional office buildings
currently located on the proposed site.
3. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The architecture proposed for the office building is consistent with the Architectural
requirements as stated in the Design Guidelines and the Commercial Performance
Standards of the Development Code. The proposed building amhitecture and building
materials have been found to be compatible with the adjacent office buildings. The
proposed entry statement is an exceptionally creative entry statement, which exceeds the
Development Code requirements. The varying building shapes and offsets provided sen/e
to break up the massing of the building. The project has been reviewed against the
Community Design Element goals and policies found in the General Plan and have been
determined to be consistent with these goals and policies. Policy 1.3 requires that design
standards be put in place to enhance the visual character of commercial centers that are
adjacenttolnterstate 15. Theproposedarchitectureenhancesthevisualcharacteralong
Interstate 15 end will be a welcome addition to the existing office buildings.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable poh'cies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that
the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant
environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt, Pursuant to Section 15332
class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a 27,706 square foot two-story office
building set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together
with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 23rd day of April 2003.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Stuff Re0ort.dec
8
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23r~ day of April, 2003, by the following vote of
the Commission:
AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D PX2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building~Smff Report.doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:kD PX2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\S~aff Report.doc
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA02-0334 (Development Plan)
Project Description: A Development Plan to construct and o ~erate a
27,706 square foot two-story office )uilding
located on 1.67 vacant acres
DIF Category: Office
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-400-037
Approval Date: April 23, 2003
Expiration Date: April 23, 2005
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or mor ey order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.0() for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption requir .~d under
Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section
15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not deliven ,d to the
Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project gral ~ted shall
be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the ¢ity's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings a~c ainst the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or i ~directly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any a!lency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body includin ~ actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The Cit~ shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality t~ ereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contract, )rs, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landown,;r of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further c )operate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all ~ ction the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such :lefense.
3. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowe~ by this
Development Plan.
R:~D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
5. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevation), G (Floor Plan), H (Landscape Plan),
and I (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Planning Department.
7. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
8. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the surrounding parapet wall.
9. All downspouts shall be internalized.
10. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with Exhibit "1' (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Planning
Department.
Field Color Brick Veneer
Parapet Wall Duranar Finish UC51131 Silver
Horizontal Amh. Elements Duranar Finish UC51131 Silver
Store Front Duranar Finish UC51131 Silver
Overhead Canopy Duranar Finish UC51131 Silver
Pilasters Duranar Finish UC51131 Silver
Store Front Windows Visteon Versalux Blue 2000T
11. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the
colored version of approved Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations to the Planning
Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall
be readable on the photographic prints.
R:XD PX2002\024)334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
14. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which
meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the
growth potential of the parking lot trees.
15. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department.
16. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid,
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
17. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
18. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
19, A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
20, The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be
painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely
as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
21. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Exhibit "F', or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with
the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
Prior to Building Occupancy
22. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department
for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
R:~D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building~Staff Report.doc
13
23. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
24. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
General Requirements
25. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
26. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
27. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation
pdor to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-
way.
28. Grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
29. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and pdvate property,
30. The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
31. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
32. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
33. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jcfferson Avcn~e Building\Staff ReporLdoc
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
34. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
35. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
36. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
37. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
38. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
39. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Mu nicipal Code, which may
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
40. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance
with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803.
R:~I) P~2002\02~0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
41. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer ·
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
42. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
43. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
44. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bddge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed median on Jefferson
Avenue in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
45. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
co Department of Public Works
46. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
47. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
48. The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
49. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
,50. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2250 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2650 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
R:\D PX2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue BuildingkS~aff Rcpofl.doc
51. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 3 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 400 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2,903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
52. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
53. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection pdor
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
54. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
55. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an extedor wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
56. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
57. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
58. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surtace roads, as approved bythe Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
59. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
60. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
R:\D I~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
61. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
62. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
63. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
64. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
65. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
66. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
67. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81 )
68. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
69. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
R:\D PX2002\024)334 ]efferson Avenue Building\Staff Report doe
18
70. If there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall
submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County
standards) digital version of the map including pamel and street centerline information. The
electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Amlnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in
a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the
data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition.
71. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Conditions
72. All perimeter landscaping and parkways, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by
the property owner or private maintenance association.
73. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
74. The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure
area.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
75. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
76. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
77. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
78. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
79. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
80. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
R:kD PX2002\024)334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
81. AIl building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access rogulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
82. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
83. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
84. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
85. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
86. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
87. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
88. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
89. A pro-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
90. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
91. Show all building setbacks.
92. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
93. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated October 21, 2002, from the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
94. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 11,2002, from Rancho Water.
95. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 3, 2002, from County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health.
96. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 18, 2002, from the Department
of Transportation.
R:\D I~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Reporl doc
20
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature Date
Name printed
R:'~D Px2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
DAVID P. ZAPPE ~: 1995 MARKET STREET
~ ~ RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
General
~/~x~ ~ O~T ~ ~ ~00~ 909.955.1200
Manager-Chief Engineer
909.788.9965 FAX
51180.1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: '~ t ~..¥.
Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: 'i~,~ OZ - o 55 q
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land div sions or other and use cases in incorporated
cities. The Distdct also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendat ons for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific ~nterest to the Distdct including Distdct Master Dra nage Plan fac lities, other reg dna flood
control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component-or extensio,n; of a master p]~n system,
and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is
provided.
The Distdct has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply Distdct approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
V/ This prgject would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional interest proposed.
This project involves Distdct Master Plan facilities. The Distdct will accept ownership of such facilities on
wdtten request of the City, Facilities must be constructed to D stdct standards, and D sir ct p an check and
inspection will be required for Distdct acceptance. P an check, nspecton and administrative fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other fac tes that could be
considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership ut suci~ tacilities on written request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Distdct standards, and D stdct p an check and inspection will
be required for District acceptance, plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
This project is located within the limits of the District's ~V~I~i~, ('~l~a~Z.. ~r'o,.~.a,,i.A ~t~o.~W Area
Drain, age Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable tees"shou d be pa d by c~lshier's
check or money order only to tne Flood Control Distdct pdor to issuance of building or gradina permits
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of'~he actua
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) perm I from the State Water
· Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approva/should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require the applicant to provide all studies calculatons, pans and other ~nformation required to meet FEMA
requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior Id grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) pdor to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Eng neers, or wdtten correspondence from these agencies
indicating the project is exempt from these reqmrements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Cert~cation
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Contro Board pror to issuance of the Corps 404
permit. ·
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
C: Date:
July 11, 2002
1
Rick Rush, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Plying Depmment
43200 Bus.ess P~k Ddve
Post Office Box 9033
Temecuta, CA 92589-9033
S~CT: WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL NO. 2 OF PARCEL M~ NO. 19353
APN 921-400-037
PL~G ~PLICATION NO. PA02-0334
De~ ~. Rush:
Plebe be advised ~at the above-referenced prope~y is located wi~n ~e
bound~ies ofR~cho Califo~a Water Dis~ct (RC~). Water semite,
therefore, would be available upon completion of Financial ~gements
be~een RC~ ~d ~e prope~ owner.
If f~e protection is requked, the customer will need to contact RC~ for
fees ~d requirements.
Water availabili~ would be contingent upon ~e prope~ omer si~g
an Agency A~eement ~at assi~s water m~agement rights, if ~y, to
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Semites
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
~NCHO C~IFO~IA WATER DIST~CT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
July 3, 2002
City of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033 :,~,~ JUL
Temecula, CA 92589
RE: Plot Plan No. PA02-0334 .......................
Dear Rick Rush:
1. The Department of EnvironmentaLHealth has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA02-0334 and has no objections.
'Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO ANY BUll.DING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the
following items are required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be
submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure
compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please
contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330).
c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055 will be
required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #6 l 5.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2.
· Waste Reduction Management
Sam Martinez, Supervising Environmental Health Specialist
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
cc: Doug Thonrpson, Hazardous Materials
4065 County Circle Drive · Riverside, CA 92503 · Phone (909) 358-5316 · FAX (909) 358-5017
(Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 o Riverside, CA 92513-7600)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA~BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~
DISTRICT 8
464 W Fourth Street, 6m Floor MS 726
San Bemardino, CA 92401-1400
PHONE (909) 383-6327
FAX (909) 383-6890 r~.~_- , - -:.-~. - -'~-'~
July 17, 2002 i' .
JUL 1 8 2002
08-Riv-15-6.619 i,
Mr. Rick Rush
Planning Department
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
Dear Mr. Rush:
PA02-0334, Jefferson Avenue Office Building,
Diamond Central Investor LLC, Applicant
We have completed our review of the site plan for the above referenced development project,
located at 27708 Jefferson Avenue on property abutting Interstate 15 right-of-way (I-15 R/W).
Project development includes the construction of a 21,870 square-foot, two-story office building
on 1.67 acres of land.
The extent of project impact to the adjacent 1-15 R/W cannot be fully evaluated with the
information provided. We are concerned, however, that site grading and resulting changes to
area drainage pattems may adversely impact existing State facilities. A review of site grading
plans will be required to fully identify the extent of impact to I-15 right-of-way.
Please provide copies of the preliminary grading and drainage plans to this Office when they
become available. Comments addressing grading and drainage impacts, the adequacy of
identified mitigation measures, and possible Caltrans encroachment permit requirements will be
returned promptly upon completion of our review.
Thank you for providing us this notification of~e proposed office building development. If you
have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Kee T. Ooi at (909) 383-4149 for
assistance.
Sincerely,
¥ /
· ~':LINDA GRIMES, Chief
Office of Forecasting/IGR-CEQA Review
Transportation Plmming Division
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:\D PX2002\024)334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
ect Site
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT - A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D P~002\02~0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
~ ooo ·
EXHIBIT'B - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION -(CC) Community Commercial
EXHIBIT C - ZONING
DESIGNATION - (CC) Communit~ Commercial
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Repod.doc
24
CiTY OF TEMECULA
Reference Site Plan
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT - D SITE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building~Staff Report.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT - E GRADING PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D Pk2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
CiTY OF TEMECULA
East Elevation
South Elevation
Entry Elevation (West)
North Elevation
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT- F BUILDING ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:~D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
27
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT - G FLOOR PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Buildir~g\Staff Report.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
PRELIMINARY PLANTIN(
JEFFERSON AVENUE OFFICE BUIt
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT - H LANDSCAPE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D p',2002\02-0334 Je~e~son Avenue B~i[d{ng\St~ff ReporLdoc
CITY OF TEMECULA
Entry Elevation (West)
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT- I COLOR MATERIAL
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D P~002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
3O
ITEM #4
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 23, 2003
Planning Application No. PA02-0652
Prepared By: Rolfe Preisenda~z, Assistant Planner
1. ADOPT a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0652
(Vesting Tentative Pamel Map) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental
Quality Act;
2. ADOPTa Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0652, AN EIGHT LOT VESTING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND
EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S).
944-290-012, 013,014.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: The MJW Property Group, Barton L. Buchaiter
PROPOSAL: A Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
LOCATION: South side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Road
and east of the Rancho California Road / Moraga Road
Intersection
EXISTING ZONING: Medium Density and Professional Office
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: High Density
South: Low Medium
East: Low Medium
West: Medium Density
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density and Professional Office
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
R:\VTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs doc
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Portofino Apartments (16.5 du/ac)
South: Starlight Ridge Residential Tract (4.82 du/ac)
East: Starlight Ridge Residential Tract
West: Vacant; approved apartments (11.8 du/ac)
BACKGROUND
The property that is the subject of this Vesting Tentative Parcel Map was previously approved of on
a General Plan Amendment to realign the Professional Office (PO) and Medium Density Residential
(M) land-use designation boundaries; a Zoning Map Amendment from Professional Office (PO) and
Medium Density Residential (M) to Planned Development Overlay (PDO) and the adoption of the
standards and regulations contained in the PDO docu merit; a Development Plan to construct a 160
unit multi-family residential complex on approximately 15.26 acres and nine (9) retail/office buildings,
totaling approximately 68,700 square feet on 7.71 acres and a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide
the site into eight parcels.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
The applicant proposes a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map. The Vesting Tentative Parcel Map will
retain the same lot configuration as was approved by Tentative Parcel Map 29140 in 2002, which
created eight (8) parcels out of three (3) existing parcels. Parcels I through 7, which total 7.71
acres, will be located along the Rancho California Road frontage and will be developed for 68,700
square feet of retail and office uses. Parcel 8, which is 15.25 acres, is located south of lots 1-7 and
will be developed as a 160-unit apartment complex.
ANALYSIS
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
The Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 31023 conforms to the City's Development Code (Planned
Development Oveday No. 5), the Subdivision Ordinance, and the Subdivision Map Act. The lots
created meet the minimum lot size, lot depth and street frontage as established by Planned
Development Overlay No. 5 (PDO 5). According to PDO 5, Parcels 1 through 7 would follow the
development standards for Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Chapter 17.08.040B. The minimum lot
size allowed for Neighborhood Commercial is 30,000 square feet net. Parcels 1 through 7 range
from .69 acres (30,056 square feet) to 1.61 acres (70,131 square feet) net. Additionally, parcels 1-7
meet the minimum depth and lot frontage dimension required by PDO 5.
According to the Subdivision Ordinance, the vesting map would confer a vested right to proceed with
the development of the Villages of Temecula project in substantial compliance with the ordinances,
policies and standards in effect at the time the vesting tentative map is deemed complete or
conditionally approved. As required bythe Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance Chapter 16.18.080,
the applicant has provided details on the height, size, location, architectural elevations, and
schematic plans and materials boards for the proposed buildings as a part of the previously
approved Development Plan. In accordance with state law, this vesting map application, by virtue of
its completion date, will be exempt from TUMPF.
R:\VTPMX.2002\02-0652 Villages of TemeculakSta ff Report and COAs doc
2
Environmental Determination
Since an Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Plan was
prepared for the project which provided conditions and mitigations to reduce the impacts of the
project to less than significant levels a determination of consistency exemption can be made
Pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed Vesting Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code (Planned Development Overlay No. 5), the Subdivision
Ordinance, and the Subdivision Map Act. Therefore staff recommends approval of the Vesting
Tentative Parcel Map with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
According to Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance a vesting map shall be approved by the City of
Temecula only if the City makes findings in accordance with the following findings:
Tentative Parcel Map (Section 16.09.140)
1. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. Each lot will conform to the
minimum lot size requirement of the original zoning district, and as permitted by the Planned
Development Overlay zone, may have reciprocal access across other parcels created on the
same site. Conditions of approval will ensure that a Property Owner's Association maintains
the common-use facilities such as parking, sidewalks, and landscaping.
2. The vesting tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract
entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965
3. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by
the tentative map. Based on the adopted Negative Declaration, which was prepared in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that the
site is physically suitable for the type and density of development being proposed.
4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval,
are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat. The application is consistent with the adopted Initial Study,
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan.
5. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health problems. Appropriate City staff to ensure compliance with all
construction and fire codes will inspect all phases of construction.
6. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project has been conditioned to
comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy
conservation.
7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements
acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed
R:WTPMX2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
3
subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to
those previously acquired by the public will be provided. As conditioned, the project will be
required to provide access easements across each lot to provide for parking and on-site
circulation.
8. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby).
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 5
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
2. Exhibits dated April 9, 2003 - Blue Page 20
A. Vicinity map
B. General Plan map
C. Zoning map
D. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
R:\VTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\S~aff Report and COAs doc
4
ATFACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO.2003-
R:\VTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
5
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0652, AN EIGHT LOT VESTING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND
EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S).
944-290-012, 013,014.
WHEREAS, MJW Property Group, filed Planning Application No. PA02-0652 Vesting
Tentative Parcel Map "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan
and Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 23, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended City Council approval of the Application subject to and
based upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the
Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F and Section
16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
Tentative Parcel Map (Section 16.09.140)
1. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. Each lot will conform to the minimum lot
size requirement of the original zoning district, and as permitted by the Planned Development
Overlay zone, may have reciprocal access across other pamels created on the same site.
Conditions of approval will ensure that a Property Owner's Association maintains the common-use
facilities such as parking, sidewalks, and landscaping.
2. The vesting tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a
contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965
R:WTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Slaff Report and COAs.doc
6
3. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed bythe tentative map. Based on the adopted Negative Declaration, which was prepared in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that the site is
physically suitable for the type and density of development being proposed.
4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The application is consistent with the adopted Initial Study,
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan.
5. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious public health problems. Appropriate City staff to ensure compliance with all
construction and fire codes will inspect all phases of construction.
6. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project has been conditioned to comply
with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy conservation.
7. The design of the subdivision and the type ef improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those
previously acquired by the public will be provided. As conditioned, the project will be required to
provide access easements across each lot to provide for parking and on-site circulation.
8. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements
(Quimby).
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Recommend a determination of Consistency
exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0652 (Vesting Tentative Parcel Map) pursuant to Section
15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally recommends approval of the Application(s) according to the specific conditions set
forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and
ail necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 23~d day of April 2003.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:~VTPiVlX2002\02-0652 Villages of Tcmccula\Staff Rcport and COAs.doc
7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 2003, by the following vote of
the Commission:
AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\VTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Slaff Reporl and COAs.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\VTPMX2002\02-0652 Villages of TcmeculaXStaff Report and COAs.doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA02-0652
Project Description: A Vesting Tentative Parcel Map.
Development Impact Fee Category: Residential Attached and Retail Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.: 944-290-012, 013,and 014.
Approval Date: April 23, 2003
Expiration Date: April 23, 2006
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One thousand three hundred and
fourteen dollars ($1314.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the
Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the
approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and
Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The parcel map shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the
requirements of the City of Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance, unless modified by the
conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State
Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration
date.
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards,
judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary
damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval
of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the
Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and ail action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
R :\VTPiVB2002\02 -0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
4. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation
measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program and conditions set forth.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
5. The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this
project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no
cost to any Government Agency.
General Requirements
6. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and
their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
7. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department
of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained
road right-of-way.
8. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
9. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for
consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and
shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Approval of the Parcel Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall
complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement
agreements executed and securities posted:
10. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Rancho California Water District
c. Eastern Municipal Water District
d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
e. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
f. Planning Department
g. Department of Public Works
h. Cable TV Franchise
i. Community Services District
j. Verizon
k. Southern California Edison Company
I. Southern California Gas Company
R:\VTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Tem¢cula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
11. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Rancho California Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include
installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer), 14' raised landscaped median,
deceleration lane.
(i) The Developer shall reimburse the City the cost for the construction of half
width of the raised landscape median (yet to be built along Rancho California
Road) at a rate not to exceed $50.00 per lineal foot.
(ii) The Developer is to reimburse the City for their fair share of the cost of the
existing median built by adjoining properties along Rancho California Road.
The Developer is responsible for the frontage along their property.
b. Install a 200' long deceleration lane on Rancho California Road at the proposed
main entrance, as approved by the Department of Public Works. Dedicate an
additional 10' of right-of-way for the deceleration lane.
c. Provide an easement at the main entrance for the maintenance of traffic signal
equipment, loops, and interconnect.
d. Design and install a traffic signal and interconnect at the intersection of Rancho
California Road and the main entrance.
12. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
13. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of
the street improvement plans:
a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum
over A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207A and/or 208.
co Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in
accordance with City Standard Nos. 800, 801,802 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400,
401 and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through curb outlets per City Standard No. 301,302 and/or 303.
g. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33ky or greater, shall be installed
underground.
i. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the
project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties.
R:WTPMX2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
14. Pdvate roads shall be designed to meet City public mad standards. Unless otherwise
approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets:
a. Street "A" (private street) shall have a minimum paved width of 28-ff within a 50-ft.
right-of-way.
b. The driveway at the main entrance shall have a minimum paved width of 76-ft. with a
6' sidewalk on each side,
c. The easterly driveway shall have a minimum paved width of 30-ft. with a 6' sidewalk
on each side.
d. The driveway leading to the residential section shall have a minimum paved width of
28-ft. with a 5' sidewalk on one side.
e. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards.
f. 90 degree parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a
minimum safe distance from intersections.
g. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration,
stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by
the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works.
h. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90 degree).
i. All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul-
de-sac or a loop road.
15. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other
disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
16. Relinquish and waive dght of access to and from Rancho California Road on the Parcel Map
with the exception of three (3) openings, as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel
Map.
a, The westerly and easterly driveways shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. The main
driveway shall have full turning movements.
17. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities
shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
18. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or
other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department
of Public Works.
19. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an
existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior to City
Council approval of the Parcel Map, the Developer shall make an application for
reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency.
20. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
R:\VTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Reporl and COAs doc
21. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Pamel
Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A
copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The following information shall be on the ECS:
a. The delineation of the area within the 100-year floodplain.
b. Special Study Zones.
c. Geotechnical hazards identified in the project's geotechnical report.
d. Aroheological resources found on the site.
22. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
23. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the
Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant
to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall
provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report
obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been
approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
24. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be
provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV,
and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
25. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit
shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
26. A bus bay within the property frontage will be provided on Rancho California Road, as
determined by the Department of Public Works.
27. A minimum 24' easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle
access for all private streets and drives.
28. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated
and noted on the final map.
29. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
30. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel Map or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
31. A reciprocal ingress/egress access easement shall be provided for the review and approval
by the Department of Public Works.
R:WTPM~002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula~Staff Report and COAs.dcc
32. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division
boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and
recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located
outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the
final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shallbe kept
' free of buildings and obstructions."
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
33. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
e. Riverside County Health Department
f. Community Services District
g. Vedzon
h. Southern California Edison Company
i. Southern California Gas Company
34. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of
Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
35. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all
soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered
structures and preliminary pavement sections.
36. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist
and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site
including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
37. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the
site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage
facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate ouffall
capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property.
The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any
upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall
be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall
be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years.
38. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
39. The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
40. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
41. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed
on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
42. Parcel Map shall be approved and recorded.
43. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The building pad shall be certified bya registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
44. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the
approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and
accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
45. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
46. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
d. Southern California Edison
47. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
R:WTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Tcmecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
16
48. All imprevements shall be constructed and completed per the appreved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
49. The existing imprevements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or breken due to
the construction operations of this preject shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
51. Any previous existing conditions on this land or project will remain in full force and
effect unless superceded by more stringent requirements here.
52. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in force at
the time of building, plan submittal.
53. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division
per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-I I I-A-1. The developer shall previde for this project, a water
system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour
duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect
changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire pretection measures as approved by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all
information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
54. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access reads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frentage to a hydrant. The
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade
of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
55. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land
division per CFC Appendix Ill-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project,
a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a
4-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to
reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as
approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into
account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
56. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet
frem any point on the street or Fire Department access read(s) frontage to a hydrant. The
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade
of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2,903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
57. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial.
(CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4)
R:\VTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula~Staff Report and COAs doc
58. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) This will include all internal
roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access
must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved
on a separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field.
59. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access reads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
60. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
61. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
62. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
63. Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than 35
homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather
surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
64. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
65. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
66. Firefighting personnel shall provide all manual and electronic gates on required Fire
Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access with the
Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access. (CFC 902.4)
Special Conditions
67. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the wildland-
vegetation interface. (FC Appendix II-A)
R:\VTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula~S~aff Report and COAs.doc
68. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall
include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block
walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A)
69. Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a
georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including
parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in an ESRI
Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone
VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and
format prior to satisfaction of this condition.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
70. The applicant shall comply with all the mitigation measures identified in the attached
Mitigation Monitoring Plan. (Environmental Mitigation Measures)
71. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the United
States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Services dated May 31,2000. (Attached
letter)
72. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the Pechanga
Cultural Resources dated January 10, 2002. (Attached letter)
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature Date
Name printed
R:\VTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Slaff Report and COAs.doc
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project Description: Planning Application PA00-0138 General Plan Amendment
Planning Application PA00-0139 Zoning Amendment
Planning Application PA00-0152 Tentative Parcel Map
Planning Application PA00-0140 Development Plan
Location: South of Rancho California Road, east of Cosmic Drive and west of
Moraga Road intersection, (APN# 944-290-012, 013, & 614).
Applicant: The MJW Property Group, Barton L. Buchalter,
7131 Owensmouth Ave, Suite 6-D
Canoga Park, CA 91309-7961
Biolo,qical Resources
General Impact: Affect endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and
birds).
Mitigation Measures: (1). The project developer shall acquire compensatory mitigation
acreage off the project site as discussed with the U.S; Fish and
Wildlife Service staff whose preference is for offsite mitigation at
3:1 ratio for costal sage scrub and a 1:1 ratio for undisturbed
grassland, with appropriate endowments and protection of
resources at the mitigation site. The developer shall provide the
City with a copy of the incidental take permit issued for the
proposed development prior to grading the project site.
Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of the grading plan check review process.
Mitigation Milestone: Pdor to the issuance of a grading permit.
Responsible Monitoring
Party: Department of Public Works and Planning Department
Hazards and Hazardous materials
General Impact: Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through routine transportation, use, or disposal or hazardous
materials.
Mitigation Measures: (2). Prior to authorization to begin operations by receiving fuel or
other hazardous petroleum materials, the developer shall provide
the City with the following materials: the Business Plan filed with
the Department of Environmental Health that outlines how
R:\D P~2000\00-0140 Village of Ternecula\Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc
hazardous products will be safely delivered to the site; managed
on the site; and removed from the site as hazardous waste, if any.
This will include all safety measures required to minimize hazards
and public health risks as outlined in the required spill prevention,
response and countermeasures plan. All requirements for
managing hazardous materials and wastes must conform to local
and state public health and safety requirements established by the
State Department of Toxic Substances Control. Riverside County
and the City of Temecula.
Specific Process: Planning staff will vedfy compliance with the above mitigation
measures pdor to the issuance of a building permit for uses
producing hazardous materials (e.g. gas station).
Mitigation Milestone: Pdor to the issuance of a building permit.
Responsible Monitoring
Party: Riverside County Fire Department, Building and Safety
Department, Public Works Department and Planning Department
Cultural Resources
General Impact: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
amhaeological resoume pursuant to Section 1506.5
Mitigation Measures: (3). During initial grading and ground disturbance activities, a
qualified cultural resources monitor shall be present and shall
have the authority tO stop and redirect ground disturbance
activities to evaluate the significance of any cultural resources
exposed.
(4). If any cul¢ural resources are exposed during initial
grading and ground disturbance activities the City shall be
contacted, and a qualified archaeologist shall evaluate the
resources. If discovered resources merit long-term
consideration, adequate funding shall be provided to
collect, curate and report these resources in accordance
with standard archaeological management requirements.
(5). If any human remains are encountered during initial
grading activities, all ground disturbing activities in the
vicinity of the discovery shall be terminated immediately
and the County Coroner's office shall be contacted to
manage such remains.
Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of the grading and building plan check review
process.
R:\D P~2000\00-0140 Village of Temecula\Mitigation Moniloring Program.doc
2
Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Responsible Monitoring Department of Public Works and Planning Department
Party
Cultural Resources (cont.)
General Impact: Directly or indirectly.destroy a unique paleotological resource or
site or unique geological feature.
Mitigation Measures: (6). During excavation and hill-side cutting activities, a qualified
paleontological monitor shall be present and shall have the
authority to stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the
significance of any paleontological resources exposed during the
grading activity within the alignment. If paleontological resources
are encountered, adequate funding shall be provided to collect,
curate and report on these resources to ensure that the values
inherent in the resources are adequately characterized and
preserved.
Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance witt~ the above mitigation
measures as part of the grading plan check review process.
Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Responsible Monitoring
Party Department of Public Works and Planning Department
General Impact: Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries.
Mitigation Measures: (7). If any human remains are encountered during initial grading
activities, all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the
discovery shall be terminated immediately and the'County
Coroner's office shall be contacted to manage such remains.
Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of the grading and building plan check review
process.
Mitigation Milestone: During any ground disturbance and prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
Responsible Monitoring
Party Department of Public Works and Planning Department
R:\D P~2000\00-0140 Village of Temecula\Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc
3
JUN 0 B ZOO0
,ted es p men o heI te ,o
Fish and Wildlife Service
Ecological Services
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office
2730 Loker Avenue West
Carlsbad, California 92008
IV[AY '8:1 2000
Carole Donahoe
· Case Planner
City of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Re: Planning Application PA00-0149, City of Temequla, Riverside County, California
Dear Ms. Donahoe:
We have reviewed Planning Application PA00-0149, Village of Temecula Apartments, Riverside
County, California. We offer the following comments and recommendations on the biological
resources that could be affected by the proposed project based on our knowledge of sensitive and
declining species and habitat types in Riverside County.
We are concerned about "take" of federally listed species protected under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended. Section 9 of the Act prohibits the take of any federally
listed endangered species by any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Take
includes "harass" and "harm", as defined by section 3 of the Act. Harass in the definition of take
means "an intentional or negligent act or omission which creates the likelihood of injupj' to
wildlife by annoying it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns
which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering." Harm in the definition of
take in the Act means "an act which actually kil!s or injures wildlife. Such an act may include
significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by
significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering."
(see 50 CFR § 17.3). Take incidental to an othe,'~vise lawful activity may be authorized under
sections 7 or 10 of the Act.
The proposed project is to construct a 160-unit, two-story apartment complex with clubhouse and
pool. The project site is located On the south side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic
Drive in Riverside County. Ttfis area is known to support occupied habitat for the federally
threatened coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica, gnatcatcher),
endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas ed#ha quino), and the endangered
Stephens' kangaroo rat (Dipodomys stephensi, SKR). Populations of these species have been
documented in the Rancho California area. If habitat, such as remnant coastal sage scrub, clay
· soils, or grasslands, occurs on the proposed project site, then the site may support listed species.
Therefore, we recommend that focused surveys occur within suitable habitat on site prior to any
Carole Donahoe 2
ground distur~hi_n~g._a_c~_iyities. If th_e~s_e__w_i[d_l._i_f.~_~p_efies_9_c_c~py~the3projec_Lsj_t_e' incidental take
authorization likely will be required before the proposed project can proceed.
The proposed project occurs within the boundary of the Stephens' kangaroo rat Habitat
Conservation Plan. Compliance with the regional incidental take permit will be required prior to
any ground disturbing activities. If wetlands are affected by the proposed project, an U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers section 404 permit and/or California Department offish and Game 1600
permit may be required. We recommend that impacts to coastal sage scrub or any other sensitive
resource be considered Cumulatively significant and mitigated prior to 'any ground disturbing
activities.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed project. If you have any
questions or cormnents please contact Ruth Olsen of my staff at (760) 431-9440.
Sincerely,
~tt~ Jim A. Barrel
Assistant Field Supervisor
1-6.-00-NFFA-339
cc: Glenn Black (CDFG, Chino)
Chairperson:
Germaine Arenas
PECHANGA CULTURAL RESOURCES eom~t~
Temecula Band of Luise~o Mission Indians Mary blagee
Aurelia Marruffo
;t Office Box 2183 · Temecula, CA 92593 Erie Gerber
i?i~ ~:~ iw ] ~ri ~T¢!~hone (909) 308-9295 · Fax (909) 506-9491 Darlene Sotelo
: '- ! :' ~ ~ ~[, : Nadine A. Murphy
< ~ ~. Raymond Ba~quez
'~,~ JAN14 2002 ~ii:
.LI , : Coordiaator.
! ~ Benjamin Masiel
:?,~, : January 10, 2002
: ........................... Monitor Supervisor:.
Manuel Masid
City of Temecula
Planning Department cultural Analyst:
C/O Rolfe ?reisendanz, Assistant Planner John ~ Gemez,
P.O. BOX 9033 Director.
Temecula, CA 92589-9033 aary DuBeis
Re: Notice of Intent to File a Mitigated Negative Declaration for
PA00-0138 General Plan Amendment; PA00-0139 Zoning Amendment;
PA00-0152 Tentative Parcel Map; PA00-0140 Development Plan
Dear Mr. ?reisandanz:
The Pechanga Band of Lnisefio Mission Indians ("Pechanga Band") is a federally
recognized Indian Tribe whose reservation is located in Riverside County. The Pechanga
Indian Reservation is the closest Luisefio reservation to the proposed project site, and the
Pechanga People have lived in the Temecula Valley for thousands of years. The
Pechanga Band submits the following comments to the Notice of Intent tO File a
Mitigated Negative Declaration for PA00-0138 :General' Plan Amendment; PA00-0139
Zoning Amendment; PA00-0152 Tentative Parcel Map; PA00-0140 Development Plan
(hereinafter "the Project").
PROJECT GENERALLY
The Pechanga Band is not opposed to the project as proposed. The Pechanga
Band's primal, concerns stem from the project's likely impacts on Native American
cultural resources. The Pechanga Band is concerned about both the protection of unique
and irreplaceable cultural resources, such as Luise~o village sites and archaeological
items which would be displaced by ground disturbing work on the project, and on the
proper and lawful treatment of cultural items, Native American human remains and
sacred items likely to be discovered in the course of the work.
REQUESTED INVOLVEMENT OF THE PECHANGA BAND
Given that Native American cultural resources will potentially be affected by the
Project, the Pechanga Band requests it is allowed to participate with the Planning
Commission and developer in developing all monkoring and mitigation plans for the
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
duration of the Project. California Public Resources code 8§ 21002, 21003.1, 21080 and
21081. (See also, Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994 on Government-to-
Government Relations with Native American Tribal Governments and Executive Order
of November 6, 2000 on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments). In addition, given the potential for archaeological resources within the
Project area, it is the position &the Pechanga Band that Pechanga tribal monitors should
be required to be present during the development of the Project.
Further, according to the California Public Re~urces Code, § 5097.98, if Native
American human remains are discovered, the Native American Heritage Commission
must name a "Most Likely Descendant" 0VILD), who shall be consulted as to the
appropriate disposition of the remains. Given the project's location in Pechanga ten/tory,
the Pechanga Band intends to assert its right pursuant to California law with regard to any
remains or items discovered in the course of this project. Accordingly, the Band further
requests that the Planning Commission and developer work with them to draft an
agreement which would address any inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources,
including Native American human remains. It is important that the Mitigation Measures
and Conditions of Approval for the Project adequately address the potential for discovery
of cultural resources pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and its
Guidelines. Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21000 et seq. and CEQA Guidelines § 15000 et seq.
(See e.g., CEQA Guidelines § 15126.4(bX3) (agencies should avoid effects on historical
resources of archaeological nature), and CEQA Guidelines § 15020 (lead agency
responsible for adequacy of environmental documents).
PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES AND CON~mON OF APPROVAL
As currently drafted, the Mitigation Measures do not adequately address the
potential for discovery of cultural resources at the Project site. CEQA Guidelines §8
15064.5, 15126.4 and 15151. Therefore, to fully address these concerns and assure the
Project's compliance with the CEQA, the Pechanga Band proposes the following
Condition of Approvai be added to the existing Mitigation Measures set forth at 14.a -
14.d of the Mitigation Monitoring Program:
Condition of Approval
The Developer shall enter into an Agreement with the Pechanga Band that
will address the appropriate treatment and disposition of any cultural
resources, and/or human remains, in accordance with existing State and
Federal law, found during excavation. The Agreement shall also address the
terms of cultural resources monitoring.
Pechanga Cultural Resources o Temecula Band of Luiseho Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 · Temecula, CA 92592
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With ltonor We Rise ?b The Need
The Pechanga Band requests that the Planning Commission and the City continue
to work with the Pechanga Band as a partner, on a government-to-government basis, for
the length of the project. The Pechanga Band acknowledges its ongoing relationship with
the City of Temecula and believes that maintaining this relationship is the most effective
way to guarantee the protection of our cultural resources and heritage.
The Pechanga Band appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on this
Notice of Intent to File a Mitigated Negative Declaration and looks forward to working
together with the City, the developer, and other interested agencies in protecting the
invaluable Luiseho cultural resources found in the Temecula Valley. If you wish to
discuss this issue further, please feel free to contact me at the Pechanga Cultural
Resources Department.
Sincerely,
John A. Gomez, Jr.
Analyst
Pechanga Cultural Resources · Te~necula Band of Luiseiio Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 · Temecula, CA 92592
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:\VTPML2002\0241652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
20
CITY OF TEMECULA
ect Site
CASE NO.- PA02-0652
EXHIBIT - A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- April 9, 2003
R:\VTPM\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Stafl Repod and COAs.doc
19
CiTY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION -(M) MEDIUM AND (PO) PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
EXHIBIT C - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION -Planned Development Overlay
CASE NO.- PA02-0652
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003 II
R:\VTPM\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report end COAs.doc
20
CITY OF TEMECULA
MAP NO. 510;Z5 "' (~
TENTATIVE
PARCEL
CASE NO. - PA02-0652
EXHIBIT - D VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\VTPM\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Stalf Report and COAs.doc
ITEM #5
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 23, 2003
Planning Application No. PA02-0620 (Development Plan)
Prepared By: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
1. ADOPT a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0620
(Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA02-0620, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE AN 8,100 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-
TENANT RETAIL BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES, GENERALLY
LOCATED WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, 470 LINEAR FEET
SOUTH OF THE MALL ACCESS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL
KEARNEY ROAD INTERSECTION AND ALSO KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-090-063, 071,072 AND 078.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Vandana Kelkar, MCA Architects, Inc.
PROPOSAL: To construct, establish and operate an 8,100 square foot
multi-tenant retail building on 1.01 acres.
LOCATION: Located within the Bel Villagio shopping center, west of
Margarita Road, 470 linear feet south of the Mall Access
Road and North General Kearney Road intersection.
EXISTING ZONING: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan
South: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan
East: Campos Verdes Specific Plan
West: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Professional Office (PO)
EXISTING LAND USE: Retail Commercial Shopping Center (Bel Villagio)
R:\D P~2002\024)620 Bell Villagio Bldg CXStaff Report and COAs.doc
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Retail
South: Retail
East: Medical Offices
West: Retail
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot ama (net) 1.01 acre
Footprint: 8,100 square feet
Building square footage: 8,100 square feet
Building height: 30 feet
BEL VlLLAGIO STATISTICS
Landscape/Hardscape ama: 185,000 square feet
Parking required: 583 spaces
Parking provided: 592 spaces
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted a Development Plan application on November 15, 2002. The application
was subsequently deemed incomplete. The applicant resubmitted plans January 21,2003 and was
deemed incomplete a second time on February 5, 2003. The applicant resubmitted plans again on
February 18 and Mamh 11,2003 and was deemed complete on Mamh 19, 2003.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Site Plan
The applicant proposes to construct an 8,100 square foot multi-tenant retail building (Building C) on
an existing pad within the Bel Villagio Shopping Center. The building will be approximately 70 feet
wide and 122 feet long, and will be sited parallel and adjacent to the Margarita Road frontage,
generally south of Building B and just north of the driveway access off of Margarita Road.
A 25-foot building setback will be achieved from the Margarita Road right-of-way. Landscaping will
be installed within the full width of the setback along Margarita Road. The north side of the building
will be approximately 65 feet south of Building B. A pedestrian plaza, which includes decorative
stamped concrete, has been developed under a previous phase between Buildings B and C. The
building's main entrances will be accessed from the parking lot to the west. Seven-rear exit and
electrical room doom will face Margarita Road, similar to Building B to the north.
Architecture
The building will be a conventional wood framed building, with exterior cement plaster accented with
alternative tile patterns and painted to match the existing buildings in the center. The majority of the
building will include the use of a parapet wall, finished with a stucco cornice treatment painted "Ecru
Bead". The parapet wall plane will be broken at strategic locations to break up the building's wall
R:kD PL2002\024)620 Bell Vi~lagio Bldg CAS La f f Report and COAs.doc
2
plane. A tower element with a sloped hip roof is proposed at the north elevation of the building. The
hip roof will be finished with double-stacked clay tile roofing material. Additionally, the tower element
will also incorporate an amhed opening, treated with a pro-cast concrete molding and a keystone at
each entry. The base of the columns on the tower element will integrate a slate tile wainscot. The
tower element stucco will be painted "Cedar Rust". The applicant also proposes "teal blue" or
"stripped teal blue/natural" canvas awnings above the front and side elevation window storefronts.
Moreover, stone veneer lintels will be provided above each awning. The aluminum storefront will be
painted "Ecru Bead" to match the stucco color. A second tower element proposed on the rear
elevation will be finished with a cornice treatment providing additional articulation along the elevation
fronting Margarita Road. Decorative wall mounted light fixtures will also be installed on the building
and will simulate a copper patina finish.
Landscaping
The applicant is proposing plant material consistent with the existing shopping center plant palette.
Queen Palms will be planted along the west and south elevations. The landscape plan shows a
landscaped area averaging 25 feet in width along the Margarita Road frontage installed in a
previous phase. The pedestrian plaza to the south and west of the building will contain alternately
colored concrete, accented with stamped concrete at the main focal entries of the building. Ground
cover and various shrubs will be included in planted areas adjacent to the stamped concrete
pedestrian areas. The pedestrian plaza to the north of the building will complement the color and
finish of the concrete flatwork proposed for this building. Decorative accent lampposts will also be
provided along the south side of the building, consistent with the remaining shopping center.
ANALYSIS
Use Restriction
In order to encourage the use of the pedestrian plaza developed between Buildings B and C, staff
and the applicant have agreed that future uses will be targeted for this building that will promote use
of the plaza. Legally, the City cannot bind the applicant to this, but thero is at least a mutual
understanding of our objective. The main entry for Suite C-101 is located on the northwest comer of
the building and will take direct access off the pedestrian plaza. In order to promote and encourage
a pedestrian '1eel, within the shopping center, staff strongly believes that a food serving
establishment would better serve the purpose of the Plaza and is consistent with the Design Goals
and Policies of the Design Guidelines which states that the City should:
Encourage the development of public spaces and plazas within commercial developments that
can accommodate cultural and social events and function as communi(y gathedng areas.
Building Design
The proposed building architecture, materials and colors are consistent with the architectural design
guidelines of the Regional Center Specific Plan, the Development Code and the Design Guidelines,
and is compatible with the adjacent retail buildings approved for the shopping center. The variable
heights of the parapet wall will serve to break-up the expanse of the building elevations. In addition,
the two tower elements will further serve to articulate the building elevations, particularly along the
rear of the building, which faces Margarita Road. The scale of the building is in proportion with the
surrounding area and will serve to complete the development of that area of the shopping center
along Margarita Road.
R:'~D P,2002\024)620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.doc
3
Landscaping
The landscape plan is consistent with the landscape architectural guidelines of the Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan, the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan requires a minimum 32' Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) along
Margarita Road. The applicant has proposed a 38' LDZ between Building C and the face of curb
along Margarita Road. Additionally, the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan provides an option
for either a 3' high landscape berm or a 3' high shrub screen along the Margarita Road LDZ. The
applicant proposes both a 2-foot high berm and a 3' high shrub hedge along Margarita Road, in front
of the rear elevation of the building. The landscape berm and hedge will serve to effectively soften
the building elevations. Moreover, the location and palette of the accent trees and shrubbery in the
vicinity of the main building entrance will serve to both formalize and define the entry.
Site Plan
The site plan is consistent with the development standards for Planning Area 1 of the Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan, the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The Development
Standards for Planning Area 1 requires a 25-foot minimum building setback for buildings that front a
public street. The applicant has provided a 26-foot building setback from the Margarita Road right of
way. Additionally the development standards require that 15% of the site be landscaped and
irrigated. That applicant has provided 15.4% (120,000 square feet) of landscaping for the Bel
Villagio shopping center. Parking for the site has been provided under the Bel Villagio Shopping
Center, at a rate of 5 parking spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area. Five hundred and
eighty three parking spaces have been provided for the center.
Access and Circulation
The access and circulation proposed for the site is consistent with the Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan, the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The Public Works Department has
analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and has determined that the impacts are
consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved Environmental
Impact Report for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The Fire Department has also
reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency
services to the site.
Environmental Determination
Staff has reviewed the proposed project and determined that no new significant environmental
effects have occurred since an Environmental Impact Report for the Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan was previously adopted on October 11, 1994. Mitigation Measures associated with
the Environmental Impact Report have been incorporated into the conditions of approval for this
proposed project.
It is staff's opinion that this project qualifies under CEQA for a "Determination of Consistency"
exemption with a project (Specific Plan) previously adopted (Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and
Negative Declarations).
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed retail building is consistent with the Temecula Regional
Center Specific Plan, the Development Code and the City's Design Guidelines. Therefore, staff
recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval.
R:~D P~2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Smff Report and COAs,doc
4
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other City ordinances.
The proposal is consistent with tho land use designation and policies reflected in the
Community Commercial (CC) and Professional Office (PO) land use designations in the City
of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan No. 263
contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned
and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development
proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements
of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the
City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned by the Building and Safety Department and the Fire
Department to conform to the Uniform Building and Fire Codes. City staff will inspect all
construction pdor to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site
design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency
response to the site.
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
2. Mitigation Monitoring Program for Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan - Blue Page 20
3. Exhibits dated April 9, 2003 - Blue Page 21
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Building Elevations
G. Floor Plan
H. Landscaping Plan
R:~D P',2002\024)620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
R:~D PX2002\024)620 Bell Villagio Bldg CxStaff Report and COAs.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0620, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH
AND OPERATE AN 8,100 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-TENANT
RETAIL BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED
WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, 470 LINEAR FEET SOUTH OF THE
MALL ACCESS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD
INTERSECTION AND ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NO. 921-090-063, 071,072 AND 078.
WHEREAS, MCA Amhitects, Inc., filed Planning Application No. PA02-0620, Development
Plan "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner proscribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 23, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as proscribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interosted pemons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set
forth herounder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The above rocitations aro true and corroct and are heroby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findin,qs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as requirod by Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other City ordinances.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the
Community Commercial (CC) and Professional Office (PO) land use designation in the City
of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan No. 263
contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore propedy planned and zoned
and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development
proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements
of State/aw and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quali~y Act (CEQA),
R:~D PX2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg CXSLaff Report and COAs.doc
7
the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the
City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned by the Building and Safety Department and the Fire
Department to conform to the Uniform Building and Fire Codes. City staff will inspect all
construction pdor to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site
design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency
response to the site.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. No new significant environmental impacts have
resulted since an Environmental Impact Report was previously prepared for the Temecula Regional
Center Specific Plan. Therefore, the project has been found to qualify for a Determination of
Consistency exemption, pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a commercial/retail building set forth on
Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all
necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 23rd day of April 2003.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23~u day of April, 2003, by the following vote of
the Commission:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D P'O-002~02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~S~aff Report and COAs.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~D P~2002\02~620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA02-0620 Development Plan
Project Description: Planning Application to construct, establish and
operate an 8100 square foot retail building
Development Impact Fee Category: Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-090-063,071,072 and 078
Approval Date: April 23, 2003
Expiration Date: April 23, 2005
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under
Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section
15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the
Community Development Department- Planning Division the check as required above, the
approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and
Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of the Temecula Regional Center Specific
Plan Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment No.2).
R:\D P~002\02~620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.doc
I0
4. All applicable Conditions of Approval for PA00-0213 (Development Plan for Bel Villagio) and
PA03-0023 (Substantial Conformance for Bel Villagio) shall apply.
5. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
6. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
7. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevations), G (Floor Plans), H (Landscape Plan),
and the Color and Matedal Board contained on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of alt landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
10. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
11. All roof drains shall be designed so as to provide the downspouts inside the building.
12. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with the Color and Material Board, contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Exterior Wall Cement Plaster Dunn Edwards Paint #DE129 "Ecu Bread"
Dunn Edwards Paint #DE977 "Cedar Rust"
Dunn Edwards Paint #DE127 "Ennis Brook"
Cornice Plaster Color Dunn Edwards #DE977, "Cedar Rust"
Amhway Molding
and Window lintels Stone Veneer by 'Cantera Especial', "Blana Tinavera"
Roof Tile Deleo Clay Tile Co.-(Double Stacked extra mud tiles)
"40% Red", "30% Rosestone and "30% Sienna Red"
Canvas Awnings Sunbrella Awnings- "Teal Blue"or Stripped '"Teal Blue/Natural"
Tower Element Wainscot American Slate, "Rajah Red"
Decorative Wall Tile Daltile, DH57 "Grape" and "Teal"
Aluminum Storefront Dunn Edwards Paint #DE129 "Ecu Bread"
Building Glazing Tinted Dual Pane Glazing - Dark Grey
13. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
R:~D Px2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Reporl and COAs.doc
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
14. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
15. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color
and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit 'F", the colored
amhitectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on
the photographic prints.
16. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
17. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
18. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Department ~ Planning Division. These plans
shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H', or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The following
items shall accompany the plans:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to Building Occupancy
19. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department
inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
20. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department
for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall complete all
conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and
proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses,
and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
R:~D P~2002\024)620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.doc
General Requirements
21. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
22. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
23. Grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
24. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
25. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
26. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
27. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
28. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Planning Department
c. Department of Public Works
29. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
30. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
31. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
R:'d) 17~2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Reporl and COAs.doc
13
32. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
33. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401and 402.
34. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
35. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
36. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
37. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
38. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
39. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
40. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
R:~D P~2002~02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.doc
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Requirements
41. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
42. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
43. The property owner or maintenance association shall maintain all parkways, landscaping, on
site lighting and fencing.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
44. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide TCSD verification of
arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction
debris.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
45. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
46. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
47. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
48. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
49. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
50. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,1998)
51. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
52. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
53. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
R:~D P~2002\024)620 Bell Villagio Bldg CXStaff Report and COAs.doc
54. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
55. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans pdor
to permit issuance.
56. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
57. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer ara raquired for plan raview submittal.
58. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
59. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
60. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
61. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
FIRE DEPARTMENT
62. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in force at
the time of building, plan submittal.
63. The Fira Pravention Bureau is required to set a minimum fira flow for the ramodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20-PSI rasidual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to raflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
64. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of I hydrant, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public straets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
R:',D PX2002\02~620 Bell ViHagio BIdg C'xStaff Report and COAs.doe
16
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
65. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
66. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
67. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
68. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
69. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
70. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
71. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved bythe Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
72. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
73. Prior te issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers'
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
74. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
R:XD 1~2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.doc
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
75. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
76. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
77. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (8) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
78. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
79. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other h~7~rdous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
80. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
81. If there ars changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall
submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside 'County
standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The
electronic file will be provided in an ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected
in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept
the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition.
82. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
R:\D P~2002\024)620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.doc
18
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature Date
Name printed
R:\D PX2002\0245620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Sha f f Report and COAs.doe
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
MITIGATION MONTIORING PROGRAM
FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL SPECIFIC PLAN
RSD P~2002\024)620 Bell Villagio Bldg C5S ha f f Report and COAs,doc
2O
. 8 8
AI-rACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:~D P~2002\02-0620 Bell Vii]agio Bldg C'xStaff Report ;md COAs.doc
21
CITY OF TEMECULA
ect Site
CASE NO. - PA02-0620
~EXHIBIT - VICINITY MAP
A
~' PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D F52.002\024)620 Bell Villagio Bldg C\Staff Report and COAs.doc
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
<>O<>¢
EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION -(PO) PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
)OOC
,OOO¢
~O<>¢
EXHIBIT C - ZONING
DESIGNATION -TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO. - PA02-0620
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R:~D P~2002\02-0620 Bell Vitiagio BIdg C\Staff Report and COAs.doc
23
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0620
EXHIBIT - D SITE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R:\D P~002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C\Staff Report and COAs.doc
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0620
EXHIBIT- E GRADING PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R:\D P~2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C\Staff Report and COAs.doc
25
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02~620
EXHIBIT - F BUILDING ELEVATIONS
~ COMMISSION DATE -APRIL 9, 2003
R:\D P~2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C\Staff Report and COAs.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0620
EXHIBIT - G FLOOR PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R~D P~002\02-0620 Betl Viilagio BIdg C\Staff Report and COAs.doc
27
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02~}620
OMMISSlON DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R:\D P~2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bid§ C\Staff Repod and COAs,doc
ITEM #6
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 23, 2003
Planning Application No. PA02-0460 (Development Plan)
Prepared By: Dan Long, Associate Planner
1. ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0460 (Development Plan)
pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0460, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A MULTI-
TENANT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING TOTALING 17,350 SQUARE
FEET. THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF WINCHESTER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 850 FEET WEST OF
DIAZ ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-
310-007
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: McArdel Associates, Architects
PROPOSAL: To construct a multi-tenant industrial building totaling 17,350
square feet on a .99-acre parcel.
LOCATION: South side of Winchester Road approximately 850 feet west
of Diaz Road
EXISTING ZONING: Light industrial (LI)
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Public Institutional (PI)
South: Light Industrial (LI)
East: Light Industrial (LI)
West: Light Industrial (LI)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Business Park (BP)
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
R:~D PL2002\02-0460 Talon Sporl\Staff Relmri and COAs.doc
I
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Rancho California Water District
South: Industrial Building
East: Industrial Building
West: Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot area (net) .99 acre
Footprint: 15,903 square feet
Building square footage: 17,350 square feet
Building height: 28 feet, 6 inches
Landscape area: 9,137 (21%)
Parking required: 28 spaces
Parking provided: 42 spaces
Lot coverage: 36%
Floor area ratio: .39
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted a Development Plan application on behalf of Talon Sport and Rashid Khan
on August 28, 2002. The application was deemed complete on September 18, 2002. A
Development Review Committee meeting was conducted on October 3, 2002 and a follow-up
Development Review Committee meeting was held December 11,2002 to discuss some unresolved
issues.
The project site was initially approved as a joint project with the development immediately to the east
(PA98-0471). The overall development was to function as one site. The individual owners of each
lot have since decided to pursue separate developments. The proposed project has been
redesigned to function independently of the adjacent development.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Site Plan
The applicant proposes to construct a one-story industrial warehouse and offices totaling 17,350
square feet, including 1,447 square feet of mezzanine area. The building will be approximately 75
feet wide and 230 feet long, and will be located generally along the eastern property line of the site.
A 20-foot front building setback will be achieved from the Winchester Road right-of-way.
Landscaping will be installed within the full width of the setback and will include berming to screen
the parking lot.
R:~D PX2002\02 0460 Talca~ Sport\S~aff Report and COAs.doc
2
The project site is accessed from a single driveway off of Winchester Road. The main entrance into
the building is located along Winchester Road with a secondary entrance into a second suite
towards the rear portion of the building. Two covered roll-up doors will be situated at the mid portion
of the building along the western building elevation and will be recessed 24 feet from the face of the
wall. One additional mil-up door is provided on the south side of the building. The majority of onsite
parking will be achieved at the western portion of the project site, with the remaining parking spaces
located on the south (rear) portion ef the site.
Architecture
The proposed building design includes light beige colors (Bauhaus Buff and Rockbridge Frazee),
tinted green glass with an office appearance. The building will be constructed of flit-up concrete. The
front portion of the building includes a mezzanine with windows on the second story of the front
elevation. The colors of the building have been proposed to accent the windows and provide a
defining element into the design via % inch recess above and below the windows and at other
various locations on the elevations. The main building entrance is set back behind an arcade wing
wall and will consist of storefront glass.
The front portion of the building is separated from the rear half by two loading roll-up doors recessed
24-feet into a loading area. A lintel is provided over the loading area as an additional architectural
feature.
Landscaping
The applicant is proposing to utilize a variety of native and non-native, drought tolerant plants onsite.
The landscape plan includes a 20-foot landscaped setback area along the Winchester Road
frontage with additional landscaping distributed throughout the site and at the perimeter. Perimeter
trees such as Flowering Pear, Canary Island Pine, Chinese Pistache and Fern Pine, assorted
shrubbery, fescue and wood mulch will all be provided throughout the landscape areas. Moreover,
the berm along the project frontage will be fully landscaped which will serve to screen the parking
lot. Twenty-four inch box London Plane trees are proposed as street trees along the Winchester
Road frontage, while Purple Leaf Plum, Canary Island Pine and Fern Pine are proposed in the front
landscaped area. Additional trees, shrubs and hardscape will be utilized to accentuate the rear
tenant entrance and the side and rear of the building.
ANALYSIS
Building Design
The proposed building design is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines, and
is compatible with the adjacent industrial buildings. The front elevation provides three continuous
breaks in the elevation, with an arcade wing wall and windows provided to appear as an office type
building. In addition, the recessed elements with color trim above and below the windows will further
serve to articulate the .building frontage. The scale of the building is in proportion with the
surrounding area and is nearly a mirror image of the adjacent building in terms of floor area. The
property owner is proposing to paint the building a combination of light earth tone colors, which
reduce the scale of the structure. In addition, the building will be significantly hidden from long
distance views once the surrounding properties are fully developed.
Landscaping
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and Design
Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement within the landscape area adjacent to the building will serve
to effectively soften the building elevation. Berming along the front portion of the site with
landscaping is proposed to screen the parking lot. Moreover, the location and palette of accent
trees, street trees and perimeter trees and shrubbery within the vicinity of the main building entrance
serves to both formalize and define the site.
As required by the City Wide Design Guidelines, the landscape plan has provided the proper ratio of
trees sizes to include 10 percent of the trees as 36" box, 30% of the trees as 24 inch box and 60%
of the trees as 15 gallon.
Site Plan
The project conforms to all of the development regulations of the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district.
The building setbacks meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code. The proposed
36.5% lot coverage is less than the maximum permitted coverage of 40%. Moreover, staff has
determined that 28 off-street parking spaces are required to serve the building; 42 spaces are
proposed. The loading spaces have been proposed in a location where they are screened with
landscaping from the street view.
Access and Circulation
The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and has
determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the
General Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and determined that there is
proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site.
The applicant has proposed a temporary hammerhead for Fire Department turn-around on the rear
portion of the site. Initially the project was approved in conjunction with the parcel to the east with
one continuous fire "loop" driveway, however since the proposed project is now an independent
project, on-site turnaround is required. At the time specific uses request to occupy the site and a
tenant improvement is submitted, the Fire Department will require the adjacent parcel to provide turf
block access, similar to the surface the applicant has proposed, which will provide full fire
department access around both buildings. Once this has been complete, the temporary
hammerheads on each parcel may be eliminated and stripping for parking will be provided.
Environmental Determination
The project has been determined to be Categorically Exempt from CEQA Guidelines, Class 32,
Section 15332. The project is an infill project within the City limits on less than 5 acres, has no value
as habitat for rare, endangered or threatened species and it is consistent with the General Plan
designation and ail applicable general plan policies as well as the zoning designation for the site.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed industrial building is consistent with the City's Design
Guidelines and Development Code. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Development Plan
with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city, because the plan to develop
multi-tenant industrial facilities totaling 17,350 square feet is consistent with the Light
Industrial (LI) policies and standards, City-Wide Design Guidelines and development
regulations. The 17,350 square foot facility complies with all applicable development
standards of the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district as well as off-street parking and
landscaping requirements.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare, because the project has been conditioned to conform to the
Uniform Building Code, and City staff prior to occupancy will inspect all construction. The
Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency
access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site.
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
2. Exhibits - Blue Page 21
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Building Elevations
G. Floor Plan
H. Landscaping Plan
R:kD P~2002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs doc
5
A'I-rACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
R:~D P'0.002\02 0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.dcc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0587, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A MULTI-
TENANT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING TOTALING 17,350 SQUARE
FEET. THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF WINCHESTER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 850 FEET WEST OF
DIAZ ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-
310-007
WHEREAS, McArdel Associates, Architect, filed Planning Application No, PA02-00460,
Development Plan ~Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 23, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
Development Plan (Section 17.05.01 OF)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other City ordinances. The plan to develop the multi-tenant industrial
facilities totaling 17,350 square feet is consistent with the Light Industrial (LI) standards, City-Wide
Design Guidelines and development regulations.
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city, because the plan to develop a
multi-tenant industrial building totaling 17,350 square feet is consistent with the Light
Industrial (LI) policies and standards, City-Wide Design Guidelines and development
regulations. The 17,350 square foot facility complies with all applicable development
standards of the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district as well as off-street parking and
landscaping requirements.
R:~D PX2002\024)460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.dec
7
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general we/fare, because the project has been conditioned to conform to the
Uniform Building Code, and City staff prior to occupancy will inspect all construction. The
Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency
access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption has prepared and
adopted by the Planning Commission in accordance with Class 32, Section 15332 of CEQA
Guidelines. Whereas, no further environmental review if required for the proposed project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop regional corporate offices, associated
research and development facilities and outdoor test area set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto,
and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be
deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 23rd day of April 2003.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
A'FrEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 2003, by the following vote of
the Commission:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:XD PX2002\02~460 Talon Sport~Sta ff Report and COAs.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
· CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\D P~2002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA02-0460 Development Plan
Project Description: Planning Application to construct a multi-tenant
industrial building totaling 17,350 square feet.
The site is generally located on the south side
of Winchester Road approximately 850 feet west
of Diaz Road also known as assessor's parcel
No. 909-310-007
Development Impact Fee Category: Business Park/Industrial
Assessor's Parcel No.: 909-310-007
Approval Date: April 23, 2003
Expiration Date: April 23, 2005
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashie(s check or money order made
payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County
administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public
Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If
within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community
Development Department- Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for
the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code
Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards,
judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary
damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of
the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action,
or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the
defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to
be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
RSD P~2002\02 JM60 Talon Spor~\Staff Repor~ and COAs.doc
3. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
5. This approval shall be used within two (2) yearn of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pumued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevations), G (Floor Plans), H (Landscape Plan),
and the Color and Material Board contained on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
7. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
8. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
9. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department
inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
10. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with the Color and Material Board, contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Exterior Colors:
Exterior Wall: Bauhaus Buff, Frazee No. 8692W
Accent Color/Window Mullion: Rockbridge, Frazee No. 8703M
Exterior Glass: Green Reflective Glass
11. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
12. The electrical transformer, gas meter and all other externally mounted utility equipment shall
be located in a discreet location and screened with landscaping as approved by the Planning
Director.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
13. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
R:\D F52002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.doc
14. A separate building permit is required for all signage.
15. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the
colored version of approved Exhibit "F', the colored architectural elevations to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the
Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
16. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which
meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the
growth potential of the parking lot trees.
17. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department.
18. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
19. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
20. The applicant shall submit a letter from the adjacent property owner to the east agreeing to
provide a wrought iron gate between the buildings. An easement shall be recorded and
submitted to staff for review.
21. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be
painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely
as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
22. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. These plans
shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The following
items shall accompany the plans:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
R:\D P~2002\02~[60 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.doc
12
Prior to Release of Electrical Power
23. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department
for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
24. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing
and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
25. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
comme.ncement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
26. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
27. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
28. The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City
Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: sidewalk and drive
approach
b. Storm drain facilities
c. Sewer and domestic water systems
29. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
30. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and pdvate property.
31. The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
R:\D PX2002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Sbaff Report ~nd COAs.doc
32. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
33. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
34. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
35. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
36. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Rivemide County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
37. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
38. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
39. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
40. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
41. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may
R:~D Px2002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.doc
14
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
42. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A,C.
paving.
b, Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No, 207A.
c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos, 400. 401and 402.
d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees,
43. The Developer shall design and guarantee the construction the following public
improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans
shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Winchester Road (Major Highway Standards - 100' R/W) to include
installation of sidewalk and drive approach
44, The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
45. The Developer shall obtain an easement for emergency ingress and egress over the
adjacent property to the east.
46. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
47. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
48. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass
Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
49. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
50. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
R:\D P~.002\02-0460 Talon Sport,Staff Report and COAs.doc
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
51. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
52. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
fome at the time of building plan submittal.
53. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a m~nimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commemial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 500 GPM for a
total fire flow of 3000 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. This project will require an
ESFR system (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
54. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A minimum of 3 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
55. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
56. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
57. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
R:~D Pk2002\02 0460 Talon Sport\Slaff Report and COAs doc
58. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
59. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6)inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
60. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
81. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901,2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
62. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
63. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12)
inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give
a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC
901.4.4)
64. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
65. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
66. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
67. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
R~D PX2002\02-0460 Talon Sport,Staff Report and COAs.doc
68. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
Special Conditions
69. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
70. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
71. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of
Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Conditions
72. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers
73. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
74. All parkways, landscaping, interior lighting and fencing shall be maintained by the property
owner or maintenance association.
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit
75. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
76. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
77. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
R:\D PX2002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.doc
18
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
78. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
79. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
80. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
81. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
82. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
83. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
84. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
85. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
86. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
87. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
88. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
89. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
90. Show all building setbacks.
91. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
R:'d) Px,2002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.doc
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
92. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter from Riverside County Environmental
Health Department dated September 4, 2002.
93. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter from Rancho Water dated September
5, 2002.
94. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter from Eastern Municipal Water District
dated September 20, 2002
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature Date
Name printed
R:\D P~2002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.doc
20
EASTERN MUNICIPAL
~INCE 195'
~doTOlr~,~,~ September 20, 2002
I~resJdent
Rodger D. Siems City of Temecula
F'tcePresldent Planning Department
~chard R. HaH PO BOX 9033
Temecula, CA 9258~9033
Marion V. Ashley
Randy A. Record
9~a j. Shoo. Dear Colleague:
~o.~s,~ Re: SAN53-Sewer Will Se~e
~ c. whi~ APN 909-310~07, P~02-0~0, Talon SpoR, located near the
C~.~=/M~.~g~ southeasteHy comer of Diaz Road and Winchester Road
~hoay~. Pack
EMWD is willing to provide sewer se~i~ to ~e subject proje~. The provisions
Dire~r ~ t~e
M~Ii~.W~ of se~ice are ~ntingent upon ~e develo~r completing the ne~ssa~
~b~¢s.. c./¢ a~angements in accordance wi~ EMWD ~les and regulations. EMWD expels
~io. v. A,h~ the developer to provide proper notifi~tion when a water demand assessment is
requir~ pursuant to Senate Bill 221 an~or 610. EMWD expects the develo~r
j~j. K..u~,c~z to ~ordinate wi~ ~e approving agency for ~e proper notification. Fu~er
affangements for se~ice from EMWD may also include plan ~eck, facili~
~'~ ......... construction inspection, ju~s~ictional annexation, aha payment ot tlnanclal
Rcd~nc and
padicipation ~a~es. The developer is advised to conta~ EMWD's New
Business Development Depadment early in ~e entitlement pro.ss to dete~ine
the ne~ssa~ affangements for se~ice.
EMWD's abili~ to se~e is subject to limiting conditions, such as water sho~ages,
regulato~ requirements, legal issues, or ~nditions beyond EMWD's ~ntrol.
Thank you for your ~opemtion in se~ing our m~ual customers. If you have any
questions, please call me at (909) 928-3777, ext. ~68.
Sincerely,
Civil Engineering Associate II
New Business Development Dept.
C~/jw
G 5AC C ES S~N ew_B usi\DA D~Archives\Year 2002~A PN 909-310-007.doc
MailingAtddress.' Post Office Box 8300 Pcrris, CA 92572-8300 Telephone: (909) 928-3777 Fax: (909) 928-6177_
Location: 2270Trumble Road Perris, CA 92570 lntemet: www. emwd.org
~A COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
· 'F-' /'"~, ,~' .... .
September 4, 2002 , ~ - e · --.
City of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033 "~-'
Temecula, CA 92589
RE: Plot~lxNo. PA02-0460
1. ~he De~aflment of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA02-0460 and has no objections.
S'~ilary sewer and water services are available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO ANY BUll,DING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the
following items are required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be
submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure
compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please
contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330).
c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 35g-5055 will be
required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2.
Waste Reduction Management
Sincerely,
~~Ma~~vironmental Health Specialist (909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
4065 County Circle Drive · Riverside, CA 92503 · Phone (909) 358-5316 · FAX (909) 358-5017
(Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 · Riverside, CA 92513-7600) ~,,,.~,,.r~r~d,~
; September 5, 2002
Dan Long, Case Planner
~ City of Temecula
Planning Department ~ ~, 'J ~ t ii
..~,,,- 43200 Business Park Drive :
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
aec,- SUBJECT: WATER AND SEW'ER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL NO. 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 21383
M,~,~ APN 909-310-007
Corolla PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0460
~. ~-~t, Dear Mr. Long:
c~,~,F.~o Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water and sewer
service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site
Johnl~.lte~ig~r and/or off-site water and sewer facilities and the completion of financial
m,~ arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
and requirements.
ix~to~oro~,.~o~:~ ...... Water availability would he continoent
~o..~ Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
u,~ This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium site with
Servicealda~ager individual building owners and a homeowners' association maintaining the
c. va~nco~, common property and private water and fire protection facilities. RCWD
C~n~-~aco~ requires that the City of Temecula include a Reciprocal Easement and
Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water facilities, as a condition
of the project.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Bud Jones, Senior Engineering Technician
A'I't'ACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:\D P~2002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.doc
21
CITY OFTEMECULA
~' ect Site
CASE NO. - PA02-0460
'EXHIBIT - A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 23, 2003
R:~D P~2002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
,OOOC
,OOO¢
)OOC
EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION -(LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
EXHIBIT C - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - (LI)LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
CASE NO. - PA02-0460
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 23, 2003
R:\D P~2002\02-0460 Talon Sport\Staff Report and COAs.doc
23
CITY OF TEMECULA
51TE PLAN ,~.
CASE NO. - PA02-0460
EXHIBIT - D SITE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 23, 2003
R:~D P~2002~02~460 Talon Sport~Staff Report and COAs.doc
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
LOT 8 OF
P.D. 21383
" ',i_i ,_, II
'
CASE NO. - PA02-0460
EXHIBIT - E GRADING
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 23, 2003
R:~E) P'~2.002~02-0460 Taton Spoil\Staff Report and COAs,doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0460
EXHIBIT- F BUILDING ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 23, 2003
R:~D P~002~2-0460 Talon Sport~Staff Report and COAs.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0460
EXHIBIT - G FLOOR
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 23, 2003
R:",D P~2.OO2~02~3460 Talon Sport\Staff Report end COAs.doc
27
ClTY OFTEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0460
EXHIBIT- H LANDSCAPE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 23, 2003
R:~D P~002\02-0460 Talon Sport~Staff Report and COAs.doc
ITEM #7
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 23, 2003
Planning Application No. PA02-0698 (Development Plan)
Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
1. ADOPT a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0698
(Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0698, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH
AND OPERATE AN APARTMENT COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 300
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ON A 16.5
ACRE SITE WITHIN THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AREA.
THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND HARVESTON WAY ALSO
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 916-170-026,046, 047,
048, 049, 050.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Western National Properties
PROPOSAL: To construct, establish and operate an apartment complex
consisting of 21 multi-family residential buildings, one mixed-
use building and a leasing center totaling 426,922 square
feet, and a request for an exception to the development
standards to reduce the onsite parking requirements by 31
spaces.
LOCATION: Northwest corner of Margarita Road and Harveston Way.
EXISTING ZONING: High Density Residential (H) & Mixed-Use Overlay Zone
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Harveston Specific Plan (SP-13)
South:
East: Planned Industrial (PI)
West: Harveston Specific Plan (SP-13)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Harveston Specific Plan (SP), High Density Residential (H)
R:\D P~002\02-0698 Harveston Apartments\StaffRepodandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot area (net) 16.5 acre
Total No. Units 98 - 1 Bedroom
158 - 2 Bedroom
44 - 3 Bedroom
300 Total Units
Density 18.1 du/ac
Recreational Space 60,000 Square Feet Min.
(Section 11.4.4.10 of Specific Plan)
Lot Coverage 26.0%
Parking required 750 spaces
Parking provided 719 spaces
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted a Development Plan application on December 20, 2002. A Development
Review Committee meeting was conducted on January 30, 2003. Staff worked with the applicant to
achieve larger outdoor decks, additional onsite amenities including a tot lot and motorcycle parking
spaces. The applicant has made requested design revisions and resubmitted the plans on March
14, 2003. The subject property is located within Planning Area 6 of the Harveston Specific Plan and
provides for High density residential uses. The Planning Area allocated a total of 300 multi-family
apartments.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Site Plan
The applicant proposes to construct twenty-one separate multi-family residential buildings; a mixed-
use building and a leasing center totaling 426,922 square feet. The residential buildings will consist
of two and three stories with one to three bedroom units. Six of the residential buildings will front
directly onto abutting streets. Moreover, three of the six buildings are located within the Mixed-Use
Overlay Zone along Village Road within Harveston's commercial village. One of these three
buildings (Building D) will incorporate live-work units with limited retail/commercial space on the
ground floor and residential uses above. In addition, the single-story leasing center will also front
along Village Road and shall include a commercial business center offering copying, faxing and
other business services to the general public as well as tenants. The remaining 15 residential
buildings will be interspersed across the site and accessed within the interior of the property.
R:\D P~.002~02-0698 Harveston Apartments\StaffReportandCOAsforharvestonaptsll][1].doc
The project site will be accessed via two 24-foot wide driveways located on a side street off Village
Road and Anchor Road. A network of 24-foot wide drive aisles will provide access within the interior
of the site. A total of 719 parking spaces will be located onsite around the perimeter of the
apartment buildings. Carports will be utilized to cover 582 of the parking spaces and a minimum 20-
foot setback will be achieved between buildings.
A mix of active and passive open space amenities will be interspersed throughout the site including
an outdoor swimming pool, tot lot, b.b.q, nodes and gazebo. These amenities will be accessed via a
network of paved pedestrian paths. In addition to the recreational amenities provided onsite, the
tenants will be permitted to utilize the Harveston Lakehouse private HOA recreational center located
within walking distance of the project site.
Architecture
Building architecture within the complex will emulate an "Americana" style, which is in keeping with
the style of the other surrounding buildings being constructed within the Harveston Village. A
separate building elevation will be utilized for each of the three residential building types (Buildings
A, B & C). In addition, a fourth elevation will be utilized on the mixed use residential/retail building
(Building D) proposed to front on Village Drive which will create a retail storefrent appearance. The
leasing center will also front on Village Drive and will have a retail appearance.
The buildings will incorporate a variety of offsets and pop-outs and varying rooflines that will serve to
break up the mass of each building and provide interest. Each residential unit will have an outdoor
deck with ground floor units having concrete patios. A mixture of stucco and lap siding will be utilized
along with decorative windows, foam amhitectural details and wood railings. Significant brick veneer,
amhitectural details, awnings and decorative light fixtures will be used on the ground floor of the
front and side elevations of Building D along Village Road. In addition, the single-story-leasing
center will utilize covered porches, decorative columns, architectural details and a decorative tower
element. Composition shingle roofs with four colors will be interspersed throughout the complex.
Four different color schemes consisting of four colors will be utilized on each of the four residential
building types. The color schemes are compatible with the colors of the other buildings within the
Harveston Village.
Landscaping
Landscaping will be incorporated between the buildings and parking areas. Moreover, significant
landscaping will be utilized around the perimeter of the complex and within vicinity of the active and
passive amenities.
The applicant is proposing to utilize fourteen different varieties of trees onsite. The landscape plan
shows trees such as African Sumac, Mondell Pine, and London Plane around the perimeter of the
residential buildings and Evergreen Elms will be planted in parking lot finger planters. In addition,
accent trees such as Jacaranda and California Pepper will be provided in and around outdoor
amenity areas, site entrances and at onsite focal points. Forty-eight inch box Camphor trees will be
strategically located in vicinity of the pool facilities and certain building corners. American Sweet
Gum will be utilized as a street tree along the Township Road frontage. Twenty-four different
varieties of shrubs including Japanese Boxwood, Heavenly Bamboo and Camellia will be planted
adjacent to buildings and within parking lot planters. Tud will also be used throughout the complex.
R:\D P~2.002\02-0698 Harvestor~ Aparirnents\SlaflReporlandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
ANALYSIS
Consistency with Specific Plan
The subject property has been designated High Density Residential (H) in the Harveston Specific
Plan. In addition, the northern portion of the site along Village Road has been designated Mixed-Use
Overlay Zone. The proposed project is consistent with the Specific Plan Planning Area which
allocates 300 multi-family apartment units onsite at a target density of 17.8 density units per acre.
Moreover, staff has determined that the proposed mixed-use building (Building D) along Village
Road is also consistent with Specific Plan Mixed-Use Overlay Zone provisions.
Staff has determined that 750 off-street parking spaces are required to serve the complex in
accordance with the Harveston Specific Plan. Moreover, the City's Development Code requires 573
parking spaces. The applicant is proposing to reduce the number of onsite parking spaces from 750
to 719 (31 spaces). Section 11.5 of the Harveston Specific Plan states:
'~'he development standards contained herein, except lot size, setbacks and height, may be waived
or modified with the approval of the Planning Commission as part of the Development Plan or
Conditional Use Permit process if it is determined tbat the standard is inappropriate for the proposed
use, and that waiver or modification of the standard will not be contrary to the public health and
safety."
While the amount of parking provided would not comply with the Specific Plan, the applicant
believes the reduction will not be contrary to the public health and safety given that the proposed
number of parking spaces would far exceed the minimum number of spaces required under
Development Code provisions. Staff concurs that the amount of parking required under the Specific
Plan is excessive. Moreover, staff believes the amount of parking proposed will not result in health
and safety concerns. Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission approve the parking
reduction request.
Site Plan
The project conforms to all of the development regulations of the High Density Residential (H) and
Mixed-Use Overlay zoning districts. The building setbacks either meet or exceed the minimum
requirements of the Specific Plan. In addition, the project design exceeds minimum open-space and
recreational area requirements. Moreover, the project complies with all applicable multi-family
design guidelines identified in the City-Wide Design Guidelines.
Building Design
The proposed architectural style of the complex and building elevations are consistent with the
Harveston Specific Plan, Development Code and City-Wide Design Guidelines, and will be
compatible with the adjacent buildings within the Harveston Village. The proposed mixed used
building (Building D) and leasing building have both been designed to ensure the retail/commercial
component of the Harveston Village is achieved along the east side of Harveston Road. The
applicant agreed to incorporate a ground floor retail component into Building D with the
understanding that the ground floor would be converted to residential uses should the retail spaces
not prove successful.
R:\D P~2.002\02 -0698 Harvestor~ Aparlments\StaffRepor[andCOAsforharvestonapts[1 ][11.doc
Landscaping
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Harveston Specific Plan,
Development Code and Design Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement within the landscape areas
adjacent to the buildings will serve to effectively soften the building elevations. Moreover, the
location and palette of accent trees and shrubbery within the vicinity of both the open space and
recreational facilities serves to enhance their design. In addition, the landscaping proposed around
the periphery of the project site serves to ensure attractive view sheds from adjacent streets and
public areas.
Access and Circulation
The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and has
determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the
previously approved Harveston Specific Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan
and determined that there is proper access and cimulation to provide emergency services to the
site.
Environmental Determination
Staff has reviewed the proposed project and determined that no new significant environmental
effects have occurred since an Environmental Impact Report was previously adopted in 2001. The
Environmental Impact Report was certified with the adoption of the Harveston Specific Plan, which
envisioned the construction of a 300-unit multi-family apartment complex on the project site.
Mitigation Measures associated with the Environmental Impact Report have been incorporated into
the conditions of approval for this proposed project.
It is staff's opinion that this project qualifies under CEQA for a "Determination of Consistency"
exemption with a project (specific plan) for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously
adopted (Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations).
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed 300-unit multi-family apartment complex, mixed-use building
and associated leasing center are consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan, City's Design
Guidelines and Development Code. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Development Plan
with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan, Specific Plan, and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other City ordinances.
The plan to develop a 300-unit apartment complex, mixed -use building and associated
leasing center totaling 426,922 square feet is consistent with the High Density Residential
(HI) and Mixed-Use Overlay policies of the Harveston Specific Plan, City-Wide Design
Guidelinesanddevelopmentregulations. Theproposed31-spaceonsiteparkingreduction
is appropriate for the proposed use and exceeds minimum Development Code requirements
and therefore, will not result in health and safety concerns. Moreover, the proposed plan
incorporates architectural and landscape designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan
R:\D P~002\02-0698 Harveston Apartments\StaffRepodandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
Community Design Goal #3, "Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of
individual districts or neighborhoods ';
The apartment complex complies with all applicable development standards of the
Harveston Specific Plan as well as off-street parking and landscaping requirements.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and City staff
pdor to occupancy will inspect all construction. The Fire Department staff has also found
that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for
emergency response to the site.
Attachments
1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 7
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 11
2. Harveston Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 22
3. Exhibits - Blue Page 23
Vicinity Map - A
General Plan Map - B
Zoning Map - C
Site Plan - D
Grading Plan - E
Building Elevations - F.1, F.2, F.3, F.4, F.5, F.6
Floor Plan - G.1, G.2, G.3, G.4, G.5, G.6, G.7, G.8
Landscaping Plan - H.1, H.2, H.3, H.4, H.5, H.6, H.7, H.8, H.9
R:\D P~2002\02-0698 Harveston Apadments\StaflReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
A'I-FACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
R:\D P~002\02-0698 Harveslon Apadments\StaffRepodandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
7
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0698, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH
AND OPERATE AN APARTMENT COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 300
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ON A 16.5
ACRE SITE WITHIN THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN
BOUNDARY. THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND
HARVESTON WAY ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NOS. 916-170-026,046, 047, 048, 049, 050.
WHEREAS, Western National Properties, filed Planning Application No. PA02-0698,
Development Plan 'Application'), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 23, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other City ordinances.
The plan to develop a 300-unit apartment complex, mixed -use building and associated
leasing center totaling 426,922 square feet is consistent with the High Density Residential
(Hi)and Mixed-Use Overlay policies of the Harveston Specific Plan, City-Wide Design
Guidelinesanddevelopmentregulations. Theproposed31-spaceonsiteparkingreduction
is appropriate forthe proposed use and exceeds minimum Development Code requirements
and therefore, will not result in health and safety concerns. Moreover, the proposed plan
incorporates architectural and landscape designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan
R:\D P~2002\02-0698 Harveston Apartments\StaffRepodandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
Community Design Goal #3, "Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of
individual districts or neighborhoods ';
The apartment complex complies with all applicable development standards of the
Harveston Specific Plan as well as off-street parking and landscaping requirements.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and City staff
prior to occupancy will inspect all construction. The Fire Department staff has also found
that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for
emergency response to the site.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. No new significant environmental impacts have
resulted since an Environmental Impact Report was previously prepared. Therefore, the project has
been found to qualify for a Determination of Consistency exemption, pursuant to Section 15162 of
the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a 300-unit multi-family residential
apartment complex, mixed-use building and associated leasing center set forth on Exhibit A,
attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary
conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 23rd day of April 2003.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\D P~2.002\02-0698 Harveston Apadments\StaffReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23r~ day of April 2003, by the following
vote of the Commission:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D P~002\02-0698 Harveston Apar[ments\StaffReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\D P~2002\02-0698 Harveston Apartments\StaffReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc ]]
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA02-0698 Development Plan
Project Description: A Development Plan to construct, establish and
operate an apartment complex consisting of 21
buildings and a leasing center totaling 426,922
square feet on a 16.5-acre site.
Development Impact Fee Category: Per Development Agreement
Assessor's Parcel No.: 916-170-026,046, 047, 048, 049, 050
Approval Date: April 23, 2003
Expiration Date: April 23, 2005
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Environmental Impact Report required
under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section
15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to
the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted
shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the votem of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
R:\D P~002\02-0698 Harveston Apartments\StaffReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
5. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F.1 thru F.6 (Building Elevations), G.1 thru G.8 (Floor Plans),
H.1 thru H.9 (Landscape Plan), and the Color and Material Board contained on file with the
Community Development Department - Planning Division.
7. The applicant shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures contained in the approved
Mitigation Monitoring Program (see Attachment 1 of Exhibit A)
8. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
9. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
10. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with the Color and Material Board, contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
a. Facia, Trim & Railings:Sherwin Williams "Pure White" SW 7005, "incredible White"
SW 7028
b. Siding & Garage:Sherwin Williams "Gray" SW 6165, "Dormer Brown" SW 2050,
'~/arm Stone" SW 7032, "Connected Gray" SW 6165
c. Stucco'.Sherwin Williams "Mega Greige" SW 7031, "Coast Point" SW 2053,
"Grassland" SW 6163
d. Entry Door & Shutters:Sherwin Williams "Andiron" SW 6174, "Nightscape" SW 2007,
"Black Bean" SW 6006, "Andiron" SW 6174
e. Roofing: Pewter Gray, Weathered Wood, Antique Black
11. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
R:\D P~2.O02\02-0698 Harveston Aparlments\Staff ReportandCOAsforharveslonapts[1 ][I ],doc
13. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color
and Materials Board and of the colored vemion of approved Exhibit "F", the colored
amhitectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on
the photographic prints.
14. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
15. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
16. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. These plans
shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The following
items shall accompany the plans:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
17. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which
meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the
growth potential of the parking lot trees.
Prior to Building Occupancy
18. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department
for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing
and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
19. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
R:\D P~002',02-0698 Ha~eston Apadments\StaffRepodandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
20. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
21. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
22. The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City
Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: sidewalks, drive
approaches, street lights,
b. Sewer and domestic water systems
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
23. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
24. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
25. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
26. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
27. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
28. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
29. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
R:~D P~002~02-0698 Harveston Apadments\StaffReporiandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
30. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
31. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
32. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
d. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
33. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required bythe Department of
Public Works.
34. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
35. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
36. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, the approved Development Agreement between Lennar
Homes and the City of Temecula dated august 28, 2001.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
37. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
38. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
R:\D P~2002\02-0698 Harveslon Apartments\StaffRepodandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
39. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
40. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
41. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commemial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2125 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2525 GPM with a 3 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
42. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads
and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each
intersection and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access nad(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available
from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be
required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B).
43. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
44. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
45. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
46. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surtace designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
47. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
R:\D P~002~02-0698 Harveston Apariments~StaffReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1]tl].doc
17
48. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
49. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
50. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
51. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
52. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
53. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home
parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which
indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire
hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be
submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
54. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
55. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
56. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
R:\D P~2002\02-0698 Harveston Apadrnents\StaffReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
57. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
58. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
Special Conditions
59. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Conditions
60. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
61. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
62. All parkways, open space areas, recreational facilities, fencing and landscaping, including
adjacent parkways within the right of way (ROW), shall be maintained by the property owner
or an established maintenance association.
Prior to issuance of building permits
63. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide TCSD verification of
arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction
debris.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
64. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
65. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
66. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
R:\D P~2002\02-0698 Harveston Apartments\SlaffReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1 ][1 ].doc
67. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
68. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings pdor to submittal for plan review.
69. Ail building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
ail details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
70. A sound transmission control study shall be prepared and submitted at time of plan review in
accordance with the provisions of Appendix Chapter 12, Section 1208A, of the 1998 edition
of the California Building Code.
71. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
72. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans pdor
to permit issuance.
73. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
74. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
75. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
76. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
77. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
78. Show all building setbacks.
79. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the houm
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
80. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health letter dated December 26, 2002.
81. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District letter dated FebruarY 4, 2003.
R:\D P~2002~02-0698 Harveston Apartments\StaffReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc
20
82. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District letter dated December 26, 2002.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature Date
Name printed
R:\D P~2002\02-0698 Harveston Apar~ments\StaffReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1 ][1 ].doc
oeo 3: zoo , County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: December 26, 2002
TO: CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Matthew Harris
FROM ~JGREGOR DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
RE: PLOT PLAN NO. PA02-0698
1. The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) h as reviewed t he P lot P lan N o. P A02-
0698. (300 Multi-Family Dwelling Units on a 16.5 acre site within Planning Area 6 of the
Harveston Specific Plan). Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE
REQUIRED:
a) "Will-serve" letters fi.om the watering and sewering agencies.
b) Three complete sets of plans for the swimming pool/spa will be submitted with
appropriate fees ( to DEH Offices c/o Pool Plan Check, 38740 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite
A. Murrieta, CA. 92563), in order to ensure compliance with the California
Administrative Code, Califomia Health and Safety Code and the Uniform Building
Code. (Office phone 909.461.0284)
GD:gd
(909) 955-8980
WARREN D. WILLIAMS ~ 1995 MARKET STREET
3eneral Manager-Chief Engineer ~ RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909.955.1200
909.788.9965 FAX
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL .!
City of Temecula
Planning Depadment
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: H P~ "/-T'H ~ ~J
Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: P~I 0 2. - 0{o
The Distdct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities The D strict a so does not p an check ci~ land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for sucn cases. Distnct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to terns of specific ~nterest to the Distdct including Distdct Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood
control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical componentor extension of a master plan system,
and District Area urainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is
provided.
The D str ct has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
~ This prgject would not b,e impacted by Distdct Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional interest proposeo.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will,aqcept ownership of such facilities on
written request of the C ty Fac lit es must be constructed to Distdct staddards, and Distdct plan check .apd
inspection w be requ red for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrabve fees wi De
required.
This project proposes channels storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameier, or other facilities that could be
conmdered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The D stdct would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request
of the Cty Fac lities must be constructed to Distdct standards and Dmtdct plan check and inspection will
be required for Distdct acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
~'~ This pr'oject is located withn the .mfs ,of the. Distdct's~V~OP. Rie. l'F~ ~I~['~r---I~TP~
Dra nage Plan for which dra nage Tees nave Dean adopted applicable fees s~ould be paid by casniers
check or money order only to the Flood Control Distdct prior to issuance of Building or grading permits,
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approva/should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this pro act nvo vas a Federa Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require the applicant to provide all studies calculations plans and other ~nformation required to meet FEMA
requirements and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
pdor to grading, recordat on or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies
indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Cert~cation
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404
permit.
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Enz~neer
December 26, 2002 BEg 3 0 Z66Z
~ Matt Harris, Case Planner
~ of Temecula
City
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
u~o. ner=~ Temecula, CA 92589-9033
.~e~.~yL~,, SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
LOT NO. 6 OF TRACT NO. 29639-1
PORTIONS OF APN 916-170-003, APN 916-170-004,
~.~.l~e APN 916-170-005, AND APN 916-170-010; PORTIONS
ao~ ~o,~J~d OF APN 916-180-002 AND APN 916-180-009 PLANNING
c,~ F.~o APPLICATION NO. PA02-0698
HARVESTON
ao~ v. m~ Dear Mr. Harris:
Phil]ipLForbes Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
~a.~, boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
E.P.~B~b'L~mons therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
~t~ ¢.~y between RCWD and the property owner and the construction of all required on-
o~ofo~o~ site and off-site water facilities.
co~on~ If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
~a. ~. V~o~, and requirements.
c. va~co,~,, Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
c~ co~ Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
02~S B:at338\F012 -T6\FCF
Rancho California Water District
42135 Winchester Road * Post Office Box 9017 * Temeculn, California 92589-9017 · (909) 296-6900 * FA)((909) 296-6860
A'I'rACHMENT NO. 2
HARVESTON MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:\D P~.002\02-0698 Harveston Apadments\StaflReportandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1].doc 22
m
A'I-rACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:\D P~002\02-0698 Harveston Aparlments\StaffReporlandCOAsforharvestonapts[1][1],doc
SP-1
SP-13
[] []
U
I
0 []
® ®®® ® ®® ® ®®®®
1' L J NOJ. SSIA'dVH qYNOZLVN lff'd~l~S~