Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout061803 PC AgendaIn comp lance wth the Americans with Disabilities Act if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 fib-u~s PriOr t5 ~ m~etihg'will enabie'th~ city to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA-Tttle-It]~- AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE June 18, 2003- 6:00 P.M. Next in Order: Resolution: No. 2003-040 CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: Commissioner Olhasso Roll Call: Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio and Chiniaeff PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are net listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary, When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and ail will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 A.qenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of JHne 18, 2003 R:\PLANOOMfCAAgendas~003\06-18-03.doc 1 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of May 7, 2003 COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. New Items 3 Planning Application No. PA03-0318 To construct, establish and operate a two-story, 21,849 square foot preschool/day care center consisting of three buildings and a request for an exception to the development standards to reduce the onsite parking requirements by 12 spaces located on the northwest corner of Villaqe Road and Landings Road in the Harveston Specific Plan area, Matthew Harris, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA03- 0138 (DeveloPment Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A TWO-STORY, 21,849 SQUARE FOOT PRESCHOOL/DAY CARE CENTER AND A REQUEST FOR AN EXCEPTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO REDUCE THE ONSlTE PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY 12 SPACES~ON A 1.75 ACRE SITE WITHIN THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VILLAGE ROAD ,AND LANDINGS ROAD ALSO 'KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 916-170-028. R;\P LAN COMM',Agendas',2.003~06-18-03~doc 2 Plannin.q Application No. PA02-0257 To construct, establish and operate a church facility in two phase, s. Phase 1 !ncludes a 10,500 square foot fellowship hall with administration anti classroom areas and a 2,880 square feet modular classroom buildin.q totalin.q 13,380 square feet. Phase 2 includes a 10,670 square foot, 450 seat church sanctuary, youth room, with an additional 2,600 square feet of classroom area and removal of the modular classroom buildin.q totalinq 13,270 square feet. The total square foota.qe of the fellowship hall and thP, sanctuary buildinqs for the proiect at build out is 23,770. Override the Airport' Land Use Commission decision that determined the proposed use to be inconsistent with the French Valley Airpor~ Land Use located southwest Corner Of Calle Medusa~ and Nich01as Road, Saied Naaseh, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a Negative Declaration; 4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THE'CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0257, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A CHURCH FACILITY IN TWO PHASES TO INCLUDE A FELLOWSHIP HALL WITH ADMINISTRATION AND CLASSROOM AREAS, A TEMPORARY MODULAR CLASSROOM BUILDING, A 450 SEAT CHURCH SANCTUARY WITH YOUTH ROOM, AND ADDITIONAL CLASSROOMS TOTALING 23,770 SQUARE FEET AT BUILD-OUT AND TO OVERRIDE THE AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION DECISION THAT DETERMINED THE PROPOSED USE TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN ON THE 5.98 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE MEDUSA AND NICHOLAS ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 957-140-010 COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: July 2, 2003 - Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 ' R:\PLANCOM M'~gendas~003\06-18-03.doc 3 ITEM #2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 7, 2003 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:02 P.M., on Wednesday, May 7, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Chairman Chiniaeff led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLLCALL Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio, and Chairman Chiniaeff. Absent: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Ms. Kristin Myr relayed her and her partner's interest in opening a gourmet food business in the City but advised that the Commissioners of the resistance she has experienced from developers and management companies. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested that she talk to the Redevelopment Agency or the Southwest Business Development Center (SBDC). CONSENT CALENDAR 1 A.qenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of May 7, 2003. 2 Director's Hearinq Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update of April 2003. MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-2. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. C:~Documents and Settings~tcintyk\Desktop\050703.doc 1 COMMISSION BUSINESS None. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS (Continued from April 9, 2003) 3 Plannin,q Application No. PA02-0340 To establish a Comprehensive Land Use Plan in association with a future retail/commercial shoppin.q center located on the southeast and southwest corners of Pechan.qa Parkway and State Hiqhway 79 South RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0340 (Comprehensive Land Use Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California. Environmental Quality Act; 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-022 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0340, A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN TO ESTABLISH GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF A RETAIL/COMMERCIAL SHOPPING COMPLEX ON A 14.3-ACRE SITE. THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND PECHANGA PARKWAY ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 961-010-001,004 & 005 Commissioner Telesio noted that he had met with both the applicant and staff on three different occasions and that those meetings resulted in additional refinements to the building elevations, plan views, and outdoor patios. Associate Planner Harris gave an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: · That the application was continued from the February 19, 2003, Planning Commission Meeting affer the Commission identified several project design issues. The following is a summary of the Land Use Revisions identified by the Planning Commission: That staff was concerned about Long Building Expanses on street frontages; that the applicant revised the Land Use Plan (LUP), limiting building elevations to no more than 140 feet of continuous building wall space without variations of wall plane, roof elements, change of height, etc. along street frontages; C:\Docurnents and Settings\Mcintyk\DesMop~050703.doc 2 · That the applicant has included two to three outdoor seating areas on the site; that buffering will be incorporated adjacent to parking areas and roadways; · That as per the request of the Commission, the existing building photos were deleted from the Land Use Plan; That the '~Nine Country" architectural style was replaced with the "California Colonial" style and that the "Mediterranean" style will remain as originally proposed and that details were included with regard to cornice treatments, columns, window treatments, materials, etc.; · That metal roofs, metal canopies, or metal awnings were deleted; · That major tenants were included in the Land Use Plan. Associate Planner Harris noted that the applicant and the City held discussions associated with both short-term and long-term improvements of the two-entry monumentation areas located at the southeast and southwest corners of Pechanga Parkway and State Highway 79 South and advised that an interim improvement design will be proposed and that once the Pechanga Parkway project has been completed, a final improvement design will be presented to the Commission for review. It was noted by staff that the Comprehensive Land Use Plan revisions submitted by the applicant would adequately address the Commission's outstanding design issues (as identified above). Therefore, staff would recommend approval of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan with the proposed conditions of approval. Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that the Commission had received a letter from Mr. Larry Markham, Managing Member of Rainbow Canyon, LLC; that the letter stated that Mr. Lowry had donated $65,000 toward the installation of permanent monumentation improvements at the corner of Pechanga Parkway and State Highway 79 South; that the funds were given to the City and that the City will be installing the permanent monumentation; and that because of the road widening project, interim landscaping will be necessary and will be completed per Design Guidelines. After completion of the project, it was noted that the City will prepare final design plans which will be reviewed by the Planning Commission for approval; that if the Planning Commission were to approve the plans, the City would construct a permanent monumentation; and that Condition of Approval No. 5 will be deleted. Director of Planning Ubnoske also noted that the road-widening project should be completed within two and a half years. In response to Commissioner Mathewson's query regarding window mullion treatments, Associated Planner Harris noted the following: · That there was concern regarding the mullions proposed for the front entry elevation; That some tenants may not prefer the installation of window mullions because it may inhibit visibility into a retail store and that the applicant may be desirous of pursuing other opportunities C:\Documents and Settings\Mcintyk\Desktop\050703.doc 3 At this time the Public Hearing was opened. Thanking Commissioner Telesio and staff for their associated time and efforts, Mr. Larry Markham, 41635 Enterprise Circle No., representing the applicant, relayed the applicant's concurrence with the staff report along with the deletion of Condition No. 5 (the City and the property owner shall enter into an agreement regarding the short-term/long-term design, etc.) and that the applicant will be dedicating additional right-of-way for the road widening as part of the underlying Parcel Map, noting that the proposed corner treatment will be in addition to this dedication. Readdressing the window mullion treatments and its correlation to the architectural styles, Mr. Markham, for Commissioner Mathewson, reiterated that because the applicant is currently not aware of who the potential users may be or whether a major tenant will be occupying the space, the project design will be user driven as to whether more or less windows will be proposed. Mr. Markham introduced Mr. Underwood, the architect, who was available for questions. Further commenting on the window mullion treatments, Mr. Underwood commented on the various sizes of the treatments; that a smaller treatment could be utilized and incorporated for most major tenants; that from a design standpoint, window mullion treatments could be incorporated but that he would be reluctant to reflect them, at this point in time, because of not knowing the future tenants; and that their would only be opposition to window mullion treatments if a major tenant were to oppose the installation of them. Concurring with Commissioner Olhasso, Mr. Markham advised that a deviation from the Land use Plan would require Planning Commission review and approval and as well concurred with Mr. Underwood to incorporate the window mullion treatments into the Land Use Plan and, thereby, ensuring Planning Commission review/approval if there were any deviations. Commending the City of Ontario, Chairman Chiniaeff requesting that similar guidelines be imposed with regard to the screening of drive-through restaurants. Advising that this matter could be addressed, Mr. Markham relayed no objection to the use of coverings, screening, landscaped walls/structures, etc. As it relates to this project, Mr. Mark Broderick, 45501 Clubhouse Drive, relayed concern with regard to ensuring a safe ingress/egress on the parcel on the southwest side of Pechanga Parkway. Mr. Brook Morris, 151 Kalmus Drive, Prism Realty Corporation, relayed gratitude to Commissioner Telesio for his participation as well as staff for their efforts. In response to Chairman Chiniaeff's query regarding the approved Parcel Map, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that a condition has been imposed requiring Caltrans' approval for all proposed driveways and that the applicant has been working with Caltrans for such approval. At this time the public hearing was closed. C:\Documents and Settings\Mcintyk\Desktop\050703.doc 4 MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve staff's recommendation as follows: Adding: That screening for drive-through restaurants would be included in the Design Guidelines; That it be included in the Land Use Plan that window mullion treatments be required for all major tenants, Deleting: Deleting Condition No. 5 (that City and property owner shall enter into an agreement regarding the short-term/long-term design improvements and maintenance of the major entry monumentation areas located at the southwest and southeast corners of Pechanga Parkway and State Highway 79 South). Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. NEW ITEMS 4 Planning Application No. PA02-0623 (Tentative Tract Map No. 30669), PA02-0648 Tentative Tract Map No. 30668), PA02-0673 (Tentative Tract Map No. 30667), PA02-0674 (Tentative Tract Map No. 31053) A proposal to subdivide portions of Plannin.q Areas 1, 2, 3, and 8 of the Harveston Specific Plan into 664 dwellinq units located north of Winchester Road and west of Margarita Road RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption based on the Determination of Consistency for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0623, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30669' SUBDIVIDING PORTIONS OF PLANNING AREAS 2 AND 3 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN INTO 195 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND 10 OPEN SPACE LOTS FOR LENNAR COMMUNITIES ON 31.3 VACANT ACRES. GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF HARVESTON DRIVE AND EAST OF YNEZ, KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 911-180-002, 003, 004 & 015. C:\Documents and Settings\Mcintyk~Desktop\050703.doc 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0648, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30668 SUBDIVIDING A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN INTO 100 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND 5 OPEN SPACE LOTS FOR LENNAR COMMUNITIES ON 18.3 VACANT ACRES. GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HARVESTON DRIVE AND EAST OF YNEZ, KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 911-180-002, 003, 004 & 015. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0673, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30667 SUBDIVIDING A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA I OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN INTO 171 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND 11 OPEN SPACE LOTS FOR LENNAR COMMUNITIES ON 40.5 VACANT ACRES. GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF HARVESTON DRIVE AND WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 911-180-002, 003, 004 & 015. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0674, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31053 SUBDIVIDING A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA 8 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN INTO 198 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND 15 OPEN SPACE LOTS FOR LENNAR COMMUNITIES ON 34.3 VACANT ACRES. GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF YNEZ BETWEEN DATE STREET AND HARVESTON DRIVE, KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 916-170-006, 910-120-003 & 008, 910-110-013. Associate Planner Harris provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: That the applicant had made an application for four separate Tentative Tract Map Nos. (30667, 30668, 30669, and 31053) and to further subdivide Map No. 29639-2 into four neighborhood maps; · That these tracts will be accessed off Harveston Drive, which is the main loop road which circulates throughout the Harveston Specific Plan (SP) area; C:\Documents and Settings\Mcintyk\Desktop\050703.doc 6 That both Planning and Public Works staff have determined that the number, location, and type of street improvements within the four tracts are consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan (SP). Density · That the Specific Plan allows for a maximum of 1,921units; ' · That the Specific Plan allows the developer to transfer unused residential units from previously approved Planning Areas to proposed Planning Areas; · That staff has verified that five additional target units have been added; · That staff has determined that all residential development approved within Harveston with the four proposed tracts resulted in a surplus of eight target units; · That the eight surplus target units were transferred to undeveloped Planning Areas within the Specific Plan. Environmental Determination · That an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Mitigation Monitoring Plan were approved. Associate Planner Harris noted that the City has received a letter from Mr. Gomez of the Pechanga Cultural Resoumes (as per attachment No.5), requesting that three additional conditions of approval be added with regard to Cultural Resoumes and noting that under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15162, specific indication would have to be reflected as to the need for these added conditions. It was concluded that the City would not be required to do this at this time; that there are Mitigation measures in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which would address cultural resources. Staff would recommend approval of the four Tentative Tract Maps subject to the 93 conditions as per the staff report. In response to Commissioner Olhasso's query regarding parks, Associate Planner Harris noted that there are parks located within the subdivision. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Bill Storm, 391 N. Main Street, of Lennar Communities, noted the following: · That Date Street will be extended from Margarita Road to the freeway interchange and that Ynez Road will be extended to the north toward the City of Murrieta boundary; · That in terms of recreation, a 20-acre sports park will be developed with baseball fields and soccer fields; · That there are a number of small parks located within the community; C:\Documents and Settings'Wlcintyk~)esktop\050703.doc 7 · That the applicant and Lennar Communities are in agreement with the conditions of approval. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Plannin.q Application No. PA03-0627 An Extension of Time for Plannin.q Application No. PA99-0317, a Development Plan to desiqn, construct, and operate a 220-unit, two-and- three-story apartment complex with pool, clubhouse, workout buildinq and tot lot on approximately 21 acres located on the south side of Rancho California Road, southeast of the corner of Rancho California Road and Moraqa Road (APN 944-290-011) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a Notice of Determination for Planning Application No. PA03-0627 pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0627 A ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME (THE FIRST ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME) FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0317 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 220-UNIT, TWO AND THREE-STORY APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH A POOL, CLUBHOUSE, WORKOUT BUILDING AND TOT LOT ON APPROXIMATELY 21-ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944- 290-011. Associate Planner Rush gave an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: · That the applicant is proposing a one-year time extension for the approved Temecula Apartment Complex; · That the applicant did not oppose any changes as a part of this time extension; That since the original approval, the applicant has submitted and has received approval of grading permits as well as building plans but which have not yet been issued; That the landscaping plans have been submitted twice; and that staff is currently in the process of reviewing the plans; C:~Documents and Settings~,~cintyk~Desktop~050703.doc 8 · That the Community Services Department (CSD) requested adding and amending the following conditions of approval: Amendin.q: #99 Prior to installation of arterial street lighting, the developer shall file an application with the TCSD, submit an approved Edison streetlight plan and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of said lighting into the respective TCSD maintenance program (Amend by the Planning Commission on May 7, 2003); #100 All parkway landscape, fencing, on site lighting and slope areas adjacent to the development shall be maintained by the property owner or owners' association (Amended by the Planning Commission on May 7, 2003). Adding: #101 The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. (Added by the Planning Commission on May 7, 2003); #102 The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchise may haul construction debris. (Added by the Planning Commission on May 7, 2003); #106 Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. (Amended by the Planning Commission on May 7, 2003). · That the applicant is in agreement with the amended and added conditions; That staff would recommend that the Planning Commission adopt a Notice of Determination pursuant to Section 15162 of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)) as well as time extension for the Temecula Apartments. In response to Chairman Chiniaeff's qued/regarding the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Associate Planner Rush relayed that the applicant will not have to pay TUMF fees until the issuance of building permits. Clarifying the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Chairman Chiniaeff noted that the City has as well adopted this fee and that it will be used to fund infrastructure improvements. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation, amending Condition Nos. #99, #100; and adding Conditions Nos. #101, #102, and #106, as noted above. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. C:\Documents and Settings~Vlcintyk\Desktop\050703.doc 9 6 Planning Commission No. PA03-0214 A Substantial Conformance for Tract Map No. 23209, to modify Condition of Approval Nos. 31 and 110 (located west of Butterfield Staqe Road and North of Rancho California Road) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a Notice of Determination for Planning Application No. PA03-0214 pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0214, A SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE FOR TRACT MAP NO. 23209, TO MODIFY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 31 AND 110, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.'S 914-310-018 THROUGH 032 Associate Planner Rush presented an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: That Shea Homes has requested a substantial conformance to modify two conditions of approval for Tract Map No. 23209 (Nos. 31 and 110), which relate to the timing and completion of the park at lot No. 221; · That the 75t~ certificate of occupancy currently triggers both of these conditions; · That the applicant has requested that both conditions be modified, changing the trigger point to the issuance of the 171st building permit; That the Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) has reviewed the proposed modifications to condition Nos. 31 and 110 and has determined that these modified conditions would be acceptable. In response to Chairman Chiniaeff's query regarding justification, Development Services Administrator McCarthy relayed that because this is an older Tract Map, the completion of the park was originally tied to a certificate of occupancy; that the Public Works Department was also in negotiation for the timing of the Butterfield Stage Road improvements; that additional improvements on La Serena Way will require that the park will be completed in the beginning of July 2003; and that the developer has been working closely with staff on the completion schedule. There being no public comments, the hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. C:\Documents and Settings',.Mcintyk'tDesktop\050703.doc 10 At this time the Public Hearing was closed. 7 Planninq Application No. PA02-0371 and PA02-0372 A Tentative Tract Map application to subdivide 4.57 qross acres into 7 sinqle-family .qated residential lots avera.qin.q 0.5 net acres and A Chanqe of Zone application to chanqe the zoninq from Low Density Residential {L-l) to Low Density Residential (L-2) located on the east side of Ynez Road, opposite Quiet Meadow Road and approximately 473 linear feet north of the centerline of Santia.qo Road RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Recommend to City Council, Adoption of a Negative Declaration based on the Initial Study, which was prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072. 7.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION PA02-0372 A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L-l) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L-2), GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, OPPOSITE QUIET MEADOWS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 473 LINEAR FEET NORTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF SANTIAGO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 945-060-006. 7.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0371 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30169 SUBDIVIDING ONE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT INTO SEVEN SINGLE- FAMILY LOTS ON 4.57 GROSS ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, OPPOSITE QUIET MEADOWS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 473 LINEAR FEET NORTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF SANTIAGO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 945-060-006 Principal Planner Hazen provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda materiel), noting the following: Chanqe of Zone · That the applicant is proposing a Change of Zone from Low Density Residential (L-l) to Low Density Residential (L-2); C:\Documents and Settings\Mcintyk\Desktop\050703.doc 11 · That the proposed Change of Zone will allow the applicant to subdivide the 4.57 gross acre into half-acre lots; that currently, the property is zoned (L-l) and would only allow one-acre minimum lot sizes; · That standard conditions of approval have been recommended; · That staff would recommend that a Home Owners Association (HOA) be created to provide maintenance responsibility for the common facilities such as the streets, rear- yard slopes, and a corner of open space at the northwest corner; · That the Department of Public Works would recommend the following modifications to the conditions of approval: o #11 -F -- all streets and driveway centerline intersections shall be at a 90 degrees; o #12-F -- all intersections shall be perpendicular (90); o #33 -- all lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. Principal Planner Hazen advised that he had received a phone call from the applicant regarding Condition No.4, noting the following: o B-2 - this project is within a liquidation hazard zone; o B-3- this project is within Subsidence Zoning. · That both sections are required prior to recordation of the final map; · That staff would recommend that an Environmental Restraint sheet be filed and incorrectly noted that this site was within a liquefaction and subsidence zone; that staff would consent to the elimination of B-2 and B-3; · That after initial study of the project, staff has determined that there were no potentially significant environmental impacts; · That staff would recommend adoption of a Negative Declaration; · That City Council approval will be required; In response to Chairman Chiniaeff's query regarding the Murrieta Fault, Principal Planner Hazen relayed the following: · That a preliminary fault hazard study was submitted with this application; · That the area in reference is roughly 150 feet on the northeast corner; · That boring samples were taken and no evidence of fault ruptures were found; · That the Public Works Department would require detailed analysis prior to recordation of a map; CADocuments and Settings~Mcintyk~Desktop\O50703.doc 12 · That if evidence of a fault hazard were noted, the Public Works Department would not allow this map to record; That the requested change of zone would require the affected lot to merge with the lot that is out of that zone, which could result into a six-lot map; but at this time, there is not such evidence. Deputy Director of Public Works Parks noted that the final map cannot be recorded until it is determined whether or not a fault line is present. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened Mr. Larry Markham, 41635 Enterprise Circle North, representing the applicant, noted that the applicant would concur with the conditions of approval along with the modifications that Principal Planner Hazen has recommended. · That offsite trenching was completed to establish whether or not a fault line was present; That trenching but not boring was performed; · That there was no evidence of any faulting that would require any setback on the property; · That a fault hazard investigation was performed; · That the open space lot will not be an open space lot and that it will be a portion of one of the lots; · That because it is a gated privacy subdivision, there will be a Homeowners Association (HOA); · That the project is not a part of the Los Ranchitos project; Ms. Lowrey, 29925 Via Serrito, spoke in favor of the project, noting that the new homes would be a great addition to the community. The following individuals spoke against the proposal: · Mrs. Cecelia Lewis Mr. Steve Lewis · Mr. Robert Burns · Mr. Steve Lis · Ms. Dianne Tanna · Mr. Ralph Neimeyer 30080 Santiago Road 30080 Santiago Road 30112 Santiago Road 30000 Santiago Road 30052 Santiago Road 29962 Santiago Road The above-mentioned individuals spoke against the proposal for the following reasons: · That the Fire Department requires an ingress and egress; C:\Documents and Settings~lcintyk\Desktop\O50703.doc 13 · That the area is zoned for one house per acre; · That the residents enjoy living in a rural area; · That the residents enjoy having farm animals; · That the residents would like to see the property developed as one-acre lots. Mr. Dennis Marchand, 30176 Long Horn Drive, Marchand-Way Development, representing the applicant, noted the following: · That Marchand-Way Development specializes in building high-end residences; · That the homes that are being proposed are not simplistic, tract-style homes; · That the intention would be to build high-quality homes with architectural features and amenities, ornately themed, and European style designs of various sorts; · That the CC&Rs will entail architectural guidelines that must be met; · That there has been no decision as to whether these homes will be one- or two-story homes. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to deny staff's recommendation. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval and to recommend to the City Council for a one acre minimum. At this time the Public Hearing was closed. 8 Planninq Application Nos. PA02-0605 a Development Plan for the desi.qn and construction of a 9.24-acre commercial center which includes two proposed retail buildinqs totalinq 20,500 square feet and three conceptual future retail buildinq pads, PA02-0606 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the design and construction of a 4,000 square foot restaurant buildinq with a drive-thru, on Pad "G" of a 9r24-acre commercial center within Temecula Reqional Center, PA02-0607 a Development Plan for the desiqn and construction of a 5,514 square foot restaurant, on pad "F" of a 9.24-acre commercial center within the Temecula Reqional Center located on the northwest corner of Nor/h General Kearny and Marqarita Roads in the Temecula Reqional Center (aka Power Center II) (APN 910-130-087 thru -090, -092, & -096) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.'s PA02-0605, PA02-0606, and PA02-0607 (Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations; C:\Documents and Settings\Mcintyk\Desktop\050703.doc 14 8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0605 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 9.24 ACRE COMMERCIAL CENTER WHICH INCLUDES TWO PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 20,500 SQUARE FEET AND THREE CONCEPTUAL FUTURE RETAIL BUILDING PADS LOCATED WITHIN THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.'S 910-130-087, 088, 089, 090, 092, AND 096. 8.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0606 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 4,000 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT BUILDING WITH A DRIVE-THRU, AT A 9.24 ACRE COMMERCIAL CENTER WITHIN THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 910-130-092. 8.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-.__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0607 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 5,514 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, AT A 9.24 ACRE COMMERCIAL CENTER WITHIN THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 910-130-096. Planning Director Ubnoske noted that due to a public noticing error, Item #8 may not be heard as a Public Hearing Item; that the item will be heard under the Planning Director's Report; and that Associate Planner Thornsley will be providing a brief report. C:'~Documents and Settings\Mcintyk'~Desktop~050703.doc 15 COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS In response to Commissioner Guerriero's query regarding removal of trees at Costco, Director of Planning Ubnoske and Principal Planner Hazen noted that the matter would be explored. For Commissioner Olhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that due to computer changes, code enforcement reports will not be generated. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Associate Planner Thornsley noted the following issues: That a sufficient number of parking stalls in front of all the buildings be removed to allow for the installation of enhancing elements such as decorative paving, landscaping, and pedestrian amenities in an effort to create entry statements to each facility; That additional planters shall be designed into the plaza fronting Pads A & B to enhance and soften the hardscape and building walls; that some of these planters shall be raised to serve as pedestrian friendly seating areas; That a three foot high retaining wall shall be installed behind the 32' landscape development zone along Margarita Road, along the parking lot, between Pads F & G; that the area between this wall and the back of sidewall shall be bermed to raise the streetscape landscaping to aid in screening the parking lot; · That a more direct ADA path shall be provided from Margarita Road to Pads A, B, and G; · That substantial landscaping has been proposed around the perimeter of the site and throughout the parking lot. Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that a new Assistant Planner will be starting with the City on June 2, and an Associate Planner starting on June 16, 2003. Chairman Chiniaeff introduced Craig Fox, sitting in for Assistant City Attorney. ADJOURNMENT At 8:22 p.m., Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular meetinq to be held on Wednesday, May 21, 2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, and Temecula. Dennis W. Chiniaeff, Chairman Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning C:\Documents and Settings\Mcintyk\Desktop\050703,doc 16 ITEM #3 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 18, 2003 Planning Application No. PA03-0138 (Development Plan) Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner 1. ADOPT a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA03-0138 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A TWO-STORY, 21,849 SQUARE FOOT PRESCHOOL/DAY CARE CENTER AND A REQUEST FOR AN EXCEPTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO REDUCE THE ONSITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY 12 SPACES ON A 1.75 ACRE SITE WITHIN THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VILLAGE ROAD AND LANDINGS ROAD ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 916-170- 028. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: ABC Preschool & Child Care Center/Malinda Smith PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: To construct, establish and operate a two-story, 21,849 square foot preschool/day care center consisting of three buildings and a request for an exception to the development standards to reduce the onsite parking requirements by 12 spaces. Northwest corner of Village Road and Landings Road in the Harveston Specific Plan area. Low Medium Density Residential (LM) & Mixed-Use Overlay Zone SURROUNDING ZONING: North: School South: Medium 2 Residential East: Low Medium Residential West: Low Medium Residential R:\D Px2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)~StaffReportandCOAs.doc 1 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Harveston Specific Plan (SP), Medium Density Residential (EM) Vacant North: Elementary School Campus South: Harveston Welcome Home CenterNacant East: Residential West: Vacant PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) Lot area (net) Total Building Area Total Building Footprint Building Height Landscaped Area Parking required Parking provided Lot Coverage BACKGROUND 1.75 acre 21,849 sq. ~. 16,868 sq. fl. 28'-6" 26,104 sq. ff. (31%) 82 spaces 70 spaces 20% The applicant is proposing a preschool/day care facility that would serve a maximum of 312 children ranging from infants to kindergartners. The Development Plan application was submitted on March 11, 2003. A Development Review Committee meeting was conducted on April 3, 2003. Staff worked with the applicant to achieve a revised parking layout, incorporation of a six-foot high concrete masonry unit wall along the westem property line and incorporation of brick on the wall caps. Staff also requested that the applicant incorporate additional architectural enhancements on the east elevation and corner tower element of Building "B". However, the applicant has decided not to make those changes and has requested that the project be scheduled for Planning Commission consideration. The subject property is located within Planning Area 4 of the Harveston Specific Plan. The site is zoned residential, but has a mixed-use overlay that allows day care centers as a permitted use. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Plan The applicant proposes to construct three buildings that are interconnected via covered walkways. Building A is the largest building and will house administrative offices and playroom facilities for infants through 3 years of age. Moreover, Building A will have a second floor that shall serve as an R:XD P'~2003\03-0138 ABC P~$chool (Harveston)XStaffReporlandCOAs.doc 2 accounting office and staff lounge. Building B will house classrooms for four year olds and kindergartners as well as a 1,978 square foot multi-purpose room. A second floor will be utilized for storage. Building C will house playrooms for four year olds. All three buildings will side onto abutting streets. An outdoor playground area totaling 14,171 square feet will be established along the rear (west) side of the facility. The main entrance into the facility will be located in Building A and will gain access off the parking area on the north side of the property. The project site will be accessed via two 24-foot wide driveways located off Village Road and Landings Road respectively. A 24-foot wide drive aisle will provide access within the interior of the site. Architecture Building architecture will emulate an "Americana" style, which is in keeping with the style of the surrounding buildings being constructed within the Harveston Village. A separate building elevation will be utilized for each of the three proposed buildings. A mixture of painted shingle and stucco siding materials will be utilized along with a composition shingle roof. The buildings will incorporate a variety of offsets and pop-outs including several covered patio structures. Moreover, varying rooflines will serve to break up the mass of each building and provide interest. A two-story tower element is proposed at the corner of Village Road and Landings Road. Decorative columns and a covered entry porch will serve to identify and formalize the main entrance to the facility. Four different colors will be utilized on the three buildings to differentiate between shingle siding, stucco, trim and accent features. Decorative parking lot light fixtures will be utilized onsite, which are consistent with other light fixtures in the Harveston Village. Landscaping Landscaping will be incorporated between the buildings to create activity areas and within the outdoor playground areas. In addition, significant landscaping, ranging from six to twelve feet in width, will be utilized between the building footprints and the sidewalks along both the Village Road and Landings Road frontages. Trees and shrubbery will also be provided within and on the perimeter of the onsite parking areas. The applicant is proposing to utilize five different varieties of trees onsite including fern pines, flowering pears and assorted fruit trees. The landscape plan shows trees interspersed throughout the site including courtyard areas within the interior of the complex. Eight different varieties of shrubs will be utilized onsite including Japanese boxwood and daylilies. The landscaping and accent amenities shown along Village Road between the buildings and the sidewalk are addressed in Village Road Streetscape plans that were recently approved by staff. ANALYSIS Consistency with Specific Plan The subject property has been designated Low Medium Density Residential (LM) in the Harveston Specific Plan. In addition, the site has also been designated Mixed-Use Overlay Zone. The proposed project is consistent with the Specific Plan, which allows day care centers onsite as a permitted use. Moreover, staff has determined that the proposed facility is also consistent with Specific Plan Mixed-Use Overlay Zone provisions. R:\D P~2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)~StaffRcportandCOAs.doe 3 The Harveston Specific Plan requires that off-street parking requirements for specific uses within the Mixed-Use Overlay Zone be addressed at the site plan review phase. The City's Development Code has a specific off-street parking standard for day care/nursery schools which requires one space for each two employees plus one space per five children. The applicant has indicated that a maximum of 40 employees will be onsite at any one time. Moreover, a maximum of 312 children will attend the facility. Staff has determined that 82 off-street parking spaces are required to serve the facility in accordance with the City's Development Code. The applicant is proposing to reduce the number of onsite parking spaces from 82 to 70 spaces (12 spaces). Section 11.5 of the Harveston Specific Plan states: 'q'he development standards contained herein, except lot size, setbacks and height, may be waived or modified with the approval of the Planning Commission as part of the Development Plan or ,Conditional Use Permit process if it is determined that the standard is inappropriate for the proposed use, and that waiver or modification of the standard will not be contrary to the public health and safety." While the amount of parking provided would not comply with the Specific Plan/Development Code, the applicant believes the reduction will not be contrary to the public health and safety given the following: 1 ) A maximum number of children onsite is rarely achieved, 2) Many parents have multiple children at the facility, 3) Some of the employees carpool to work. Given these factors, staff believes an off-street parking reduction is appropriate. Moreover, staff believes the amount of parking proposed will not result in health and safety concerns. Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission approve the parking reduction request. Site Plan The project conforms to all of the development regulations of the Mixed-Use Overlay zoning district. The building setbacks either meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the Specific Plan. In addition, the project design exceeds minimum lot coverage requirements. Building Design The subject property is located at the intersection of Village Road and Landings Road and serves as one of the four main corners within the Harveston commercial village. The Harveston Specific Plan specifies that the village be pedestrian oriented in terms of building scale and design. The Mixed Use Overlay Zone Site Planning Guidelines state: "Buildings shall be adjacent to the street or the adjacent landscape planter area to create a pedestrian oriented streetscape within the Mixed-Use Village Center." 2. "The first floor of any multi-floor building should be oriented to the pedestrian." '"]'he design of the building facades shall be architecturally interesting and in scale with the pedestrian." "Ground floor elevations shall avoid large blank walls, with windows and doorways located at frequent intervals." Staff believes the proposed architectural style of the building will be compatible with the adjacent buildings within the Harveston Village. While staff is satisfied with the overall building design and architecture, concerns were expressed to the applicant at the DRC meeting regarding the corner feature at Village Road and Landings Road and the Village Road elevation of Building "B". Given R:\D PL2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)~SlaffRepottandCOAs.doc 4 that the site is at a prominent corner, staff believes a more significant and interesting corner treatment is warranted. Therefore, staff recommends that a false entry feature be incorporated into the tower that emulates the main building entrance. This has been made a recommended condition of approval. Staff also feels the fifty-five foot long, five-foot high CMU wall and lineal roof line along the Village Road elevation of Building "B" is not oriented to the pedestrian and again lacks architectural interest. Therefore, staff recommends that the proposed dormer windows along this elevation be replaced with three dormem that match the design used on the main entry elevation. Staff also recommends that the CMU wall be opened up to the street with the incorporation of wrought iron to match the wall design used on the main entry elevation. These modifications have been made recommended conditions of approval. Staff further suggests that all recommended amhitectural modifications be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The applicant has indicated that modifications to the corner treatment are not warranted. In addition, only minor modifications have been made to the Village Road elevation. The applicant has now requested that the project be considered by the Planning Commission. Landscaping The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Harveston Specific Plan, Development Code and Design Guidelines. However, should the Commission require the building elevation modifications requested by staff, the landscape plan must be reevaluated and revised accordingly so as to compliment the revised elevations. Staff suggests that the revised landscaping improvements be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Access and Circulation The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. Environmental Determination Staff has reviewed the proposed project and determined that no new significant environmental effects have occurred since an Environmental Impact Report was previously adopted in 2001. The Environmental Impact Report was certified with the adoption of the Harveston Specific Plan, which envisioned the construction of a day care center within the Mixed Use Overlay Zone. Mitigation Measures associated with the Environmental Impact Reporl have been incorporated into the conditions of approval for this proposed project. It is staff's opinion that this project qualifies under CEQA for a "Determination of Consistency" exemption with a project (specific plan) for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously adopted (Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the 21,849 square foot preschool/day care facility, as conditioned, is consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan, City's Design Guidelines and Development Code. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval. R:~D P~2003\034)138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)XStafffieportandCOAs.doc 5 FINDINGS Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan, Specific Plan, and with all applicable requirements of state law and other City ordinances. The plan to develop a two-story preschool/day care center totaling 21,849 square feet is consistent with the Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Mixed-Use Overlay policies of the Harveston Specific Plan, City-Wide Design Guidelines and development regulations. The proposed 12-space onsite parking reduction is appropriate for the proposed use and will not result in health and safety concerns. Moreover, the proposed plan, as conditioned, incorporates architectural and landscape designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan Community Design Goal #3, "Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual districts or neighborhoods ". The preschool/day care facility complies with all applicable development standards of the Harveston Specific Plan as well as off-street parking and landscaping requirements. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and City staff prior to occupancy will inspect all construction. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site. Attachments 1. PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 7 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 11 Harveston Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 22 Exhibits - Blue Page 23 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan Map D. Site Plan E. Grading Plan F. Building Elevations G. Floor Plans H. Landscaping Plan R:\D P~2003\03 0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)~StaffRepo~andCOAs.doc 6 ATFACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- R:~D PX2003\03~0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)~StaffRepor~aadCOAs.doc 7 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A TWO-STORY, 21,849 SQUARE FOOT PRESCHOOL/DAY CARE CENTER AND A REQUEST FOR AN EXCEPTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO REDUCE THE ONSITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY 12 SPACES ON A 1.75 ACRE SITE WITHIN THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VILLAGE ROAD AND LANDINGS ROAD ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 916-170- 028. WHEREAS, ABC Preschool & Child Care Center, filed Planning Application No. PA03-0138, Development Plan "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 18, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. reference. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.01 OF of the Temecula Municipal Code: Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan, Specific Plan, and with all applicable requirements of state law and other City ordinances. The plan to develop a two-story preschool/day care center totaling 21,849 square feet is consistent with the Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Mixed-Use Overlay policies of the Harveston Specific Plan, City-Wide Design Guidelines and development regulations. The proposed 12-space onsite parking reduction is appropriate for the proposed use and will R:\D PX2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)\StafrReportandCOAs.doc 8 not result in health and safety concerns. Moreover, the proposed plan, as conditioned, incorporates architectural and landscape designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan Community Design Goal 113, "Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual districts or neighborhoods ". The preschool/day care facility complies with all applicable development standards of the Harveston Specific Plan as well as off-street parking and landscaping requirements. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and City staff prior to occupancy will inspect all construction. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. No new significant environmental impacts have resulted since an Environmental Impact Report was previously prepared. Therefore, the project has been found to qualify for a Determination of Consistency exemption, pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a two-story preschool facility totaling 21,849 square feet set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein bythis reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 18t~ day of June 2003. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R:~D Px2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Ha~eston)~StaftRepo~tandCOAs.doc 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18t~ day of June 2003, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D P~2003\03-0138 ABC P~eschool (Harveston)~StaffReportandCOAs,doc 10 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\D P~2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harvest0n)~StaffReportandCOAg.doc EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA03-0138 Development Plan Project Description: A Development Plan to construct, establish and operate a two-story preschool/day care facility consisting of three buildings totaling 21,849 square feet on a 1.75-acre site. Development Impact Fee Category: Per Development Agreement Assessor's Parcel No.: 916-170-028 Approval Date: June18,2003 Expiration Date: June18,2005 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. R:~D Pt2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harves~on)~StaftReportandCOAs.doc 10. 11. 12. 13. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. A maximum of 312 children shall attend the preschool/day care facility at any one time. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D (Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevations), G (Floor Plans), H (Landscape Plan), and the Color and Material Board contained on file with the Community Development Department- Planning Division. A false building entrance shall be incorporated into the tower element at the comer of Village Road and Landings Road. The false entrance shall include features similar to the main building entrance. The design and placement of the entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The existing dormer windows on the Village Road elevation of Building "B" shall be deleted and replaced with three dormer windows that match the design of the dormer windows on the main entrance elevation. The design and placement of the windows shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The fifty-five foot long, five-foot high CMU wall on the Village Road elevation of Building "B" shall be modified to match the wall design on the main entrance elevation. The design shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The applicant shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program (see Attachment 2) Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of ali landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with the Color and Material Board, contained on file with the Planning Department. a. Shingle Siding: b. Stucco Siding: c. Accent Color: d. Trim Color: e. Roofing: Sherwin Williams "Rookwood Red" SW 2802 Sherwin Williams "Birdseye Maple" SW 2834 Sherwin Williams "Rookwood Shutter Green" SW 2809 Sherwin Williams "Whitetail" SW 7103 Elk Premium Roofing - Capstone 40 Series "Fossil Grey" R:\D I~2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)'~StaffReportandCOA$.doc 13 1 5. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 16. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Depadment staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 17. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "F", the colored amhitectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 18. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 19. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 20. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The following items shall accompany the plans: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). 21. The applicant shall Submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. Prior to Building Occupancy 22. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. R:kD 1~2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool ( H arveston)~S ta ffRepor tandCOAs.doc 14 General Requirements 23. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 24. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 25. Ail grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 26. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Harveston Specific Plan No. 13 (PA99-0418) as approved on August 14, 2001. 27. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29639 (PA00-0295) as approved on August 14, 2001. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 28. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 29. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 30. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 31. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resoumes Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 32. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Planning Department Department of Public Works 33. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. R:\D PX2003\03-0138 ABC Preachool (Harqeston)XStaffReportandCOAs.doc 15 34. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 35. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 36. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 37. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207^. c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401 and 402. d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. e. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 38. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 39. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement between the City and Developer dated August 28, 2001. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 40. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 41. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 42. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. R:~D P'~2003\03-0] 38 ABC Preschool (Harves~n)\Staft~Rcpo~aadCOAs.doc 16 FIRE DEPARTMENT 43. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in force at the time of building, plan submittal. 44. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 200 GPM at 20 PSi residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a total fire flow of 2400 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire pretection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as previded. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 45. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off- site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access reads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access read(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) 46. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved reute around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 47. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020) 48. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide appreved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 49. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have appreved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access reads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 50. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access reads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 51. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) R:\D P~2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (H arves ton)\S ta ffReportandCOAs.doc 17 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed centrsl station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. R:\D P~2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)\StaffReportandCOAs.doc 18 Special Conditions 62. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 63. if there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in an ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition. 64. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) COMMUNITY SERVICES GENERALCONDITIONS 65. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. 66. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 67. All parkways within the ROW, landscaping, fencing and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 68. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. BUILDING AND SAFETY 69. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 70. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("i'UMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31,2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 71. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor RAD P~2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)~StaftRepormadCOAs.doc 19 lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining properly or public rights-of-way. 72. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 73. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 74. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 75. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 76. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 77. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 78. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 79. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 80. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 81. Provide electrical plan including Icad calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 82. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 83. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 84. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 85. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 86. Show all building setbacks. 87. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays R:\D PX2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)',StaffReportandCOAs.doc 2O OUTSIDE AGENCIES 88. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health letter dated March 19, 2003. 89. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District letter dated March 17, 2003. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Name printed R:~D 1~,2003\03 0138 ABC Preschool (Harvcston)~Staft~eport~dCOAs,doc 21 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH March 19, 2003 City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Matt Harris RE: Plot Plan No. PA03-0138 Dear Mr. Harris: The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA03-0138, to construct and operate a two-story day dare/pre-school facility and we have no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. 2. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the following items are required: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330). Sincerely, ~nvironmental Health Specialist (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. 4065 County Circle Drive · Riverside, CA 92503 · Phone (909) 358-5316 · FAX (909) 358-5017 (Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 · Riverside, CA 92513-7600) March 17, 2003 Matt Harris, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY LOT NO. 8 OF TRACT NO. 29639-1 APN 916-170-028 CASE NO. PA03-0138 Dear Mr. Harris: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property, owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium site with individual building owners and a homeowners' association maintaining the common property and private water and fire protection facilities. RCWD requires that the City of Temecula include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water facilities, as a condition of the project. In addition to this agreement, RCWD will require individual water meters for each building if a condominium conversion takes place. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 03~SB:atO72~F012-T6XFCF c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor Bud Jones, Senior Engineering Technician ATTACHMENT NO. 2 HARVESTON MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM R:\D PX2003\03~}138 ABC Pr~chaol (Harveston)XStaffRepor~aadCOAs.doc 0 ._-- . ~._ ~ Z 0 Z 0 Z © Z 0 [.., ~u~= u ~o U.9 ~o~~ ~o~u~ ~ ._ E~ :~ ~..= ~_ o~ ~ o 0 ti z~ ~ ~ I~ ~o° ~ ~8 ~ ~ ~'-~ I / z ~ ~ p ~ ~ -'~ 8~ = . ~ ~ ~,_~_,_ ~ o o~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ = '~'~ I/ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ < E ~o~ ~ oo .~ Z 0 Z 0 J~ ATFACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBITS R:\D P~2003\03:0138 ABC Preschool (Harves~on)~StaffReporla~dCOAs.doc ,~3 CITY OF TEMECULA ect Site PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 18, 2003 RAD PX2003\03~)t 38 ABC Preschool ( H arveston)~S ta ffRepor~andCOAs.doc 24 CITY OF TEMECULA SP-13 EXHIBIT B DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial) ZONING MAP EXHIBIT C DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial) PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 (Development Plan) PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 18, 2003 GENERALPLAN P,:\D PX2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Hmweston)~Stafl~epo~andCOAs.doc 25 EXHIBIT D ~10~. ~ ~ PLANNING APPLICAT A03-0138 (Devel ment Plan) PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 18, 2003 R:\D P~2003\034}138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)\StaffRcportandCOAs.doc EXHF PLAI PLA R:\D t~2 E ~NING APPLI¢ ,INING COMMISSION ~03\03-0138 AB(] Preschool (HarvIston)\$t~ffR~po~land(]OAs.dac ~N IIX, 1111i EXHIBIT F1 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 18, 2003 R:kD PX2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)XStaffReporlandCOAs.doc NS | IIJ[JJJIiJJXJIitJi ~ illli ~lllh ,,J JjjJj EXHIBIT F2 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 (Deve PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 18, 2003 R:~D I~2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)XStafffieporlandCOAs.doc )ment Plan) ii II EXHIBIT G1 PLANNING l PLANNING CI NO R:\D P~2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)\StaffReportandCOAs.doc Ii, L .......... i EXHIBIT G2 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-01: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 1 R:~D P~2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)~Sta flRepo~tandCOAs.doc U R FLi g PI PI tlBIT H ~ .ANNING APPLICATION~NO. PA03-0138 (Development Plen) .ANNING COMMI$$1ON~DATE - dune 18, 2003 R:\D PX2003\03-0138 ABC Preschool (Harveston)~StaftReportandCOAs.doc ITEM #4 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 18, 2003 Planning Application No. PA02-0257 (Conditional Use Permit & Development Plan) Grace Presbyterian Chumh Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Senior Planner 1. ADOPT a Negative Declaration; 2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0257, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A CHURCH FACILITY IN TWO PHASES TO INCLUDE A FELLOWSHIP HALL WITH ADMINISTRATION AND CLASSROOM AREAS, A TEMPORARY MODULAR CLASSROOM BUILDING, A 450 SEAT CHURCH SANCTUARY WITH YOUTH ROOM, AND ADDITIONAL CLASSROOMS TOTALING 23,770 SQUARE FEET AT BUILD-OUT AND TO OVERRIDE THE AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION DECISION THAT DETERMINED THE PROPOSED USE TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN ON THE 5.98 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE MEDUSA AND NICHOLAS ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 957-140-010 APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Herron & Rumansoff Architects PROPOSAL: To construct, establish and operate a church facility in two phases. Phase I includes a 10,500 square foot fellowship hall with administration and classroom areas and a 2,880 square feet modular classroom building totaling 13,380 square feet. Phase 2 includes a 10,670 square foot, 450 seat church sanctuary, youth room, with an additional 2,600 square feet of classroom area and removal of the modular classroom building totaling 13,270 square feet. The total square footage of the fellowship hall and the sanctuary buildings for the project at build out is 23,770. Override the R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 1 Airport Land Use Commission decision that determined the proposed use to be inconsistent with the French Valley Airport Land Use Plan. LOCATION: Southwest Corner Of Calle Medusa And Nicholas Road EXISTING ZONING: Very Low Density Residential SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Very Low Density Residential South: Very Low Density Residential East: Very Low Density Residential West: Very Low Density Residential GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Very Low Density Residential EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Church PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) Total Lot Area (gross): Building Square Footage: LandscapingNV alkways: Proposed Parking Spaces: Required Parking Spaces: Building Lot Coverage: Floor Area Ratio: Building Height: 216,929 square feet (4.98 acres) Phase I - 13,380square feet including a 10,500 square feet fellowship hall with administration and classrooms and 2,880 square feet of modular classroom area Phase 2 - 13,270 square feet including a 10,670 square foot sanctuary and 2,600 square feet of additional classroom and removal of the modular classroom building Total (Phase I and 2) - 23,270 square feet (with modular class room removed) Phase 1 - 109,717 square feet (63%) Total (Phase 1 and 2) 99,327 (57%) Phase 1 - 104 Spaces Total (Phase I and 2), 151 Spaces Phase I - 101 Spaces Total (Phase 1 and 2), 150 Spaces Phase 1 - 13,380 (8%) Total (phase 1 and 2), 23,770 (14%) N/A Phase 1 - 30' Phase 2 - 32' with 45' cross-tower R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 2 BACKGROUND The application was filed on May 17, 2002 and was transmitted to the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). On October 18, 2002 the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) found the proposed project to be inconsistent with the French Valley Airport Land Use Plan since the site is within the airport's Traffic Pattern Zone (TPZ). The French Valley Airport Comprehensive Plan discourages auditoriums, schools, and stadiums within the TPZ. The ALUC considers the proposed use to fall into this category of uses. As a result, the City Council needs to override the ALUC's decision if this project was to be approved by the City. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing to develop the 4.98-acre site in two phases. Phase 1 includes the Sanctuary Hall Building with 3,550 square feet of seating area for services. The rest of the building includes administration offices and classrooms. The exterior plaza area for both phases will be built with Phase 1. Approximately 22,100 square feet of the site will be graded and hyroseeded, which will eventually become the parking area for Phase 2. In addition, at the southern end of the site a 36,000 square foot area will be set aside as undisturbed natural open space. This area will remain as open space at the build-out of the project. In addition, Phase 1 includes a temporary 2,880 square foot modular classroom building, which will be removed in Phase 2. One hundred and one (101 ) parking spaces are provided for this phase mostly located to the north of the site along Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa. Phase 2 of the project represents the build-out of the site. With this phase, the 10,670 square foot Sanctuary Building replaces the modular classroom building and the final parking spaces will be built in the hyroseeded area of Phase 1. ANALYSIS Airport Land Use Commission Recommendation The site is located within the Traffic Pattern Zone of the French Valley Airport, which "discourages" the proposed use. The Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) has found the proposed project to be inconsistent with the French Valley Airport Land Use Plan. The Public Utilities Code Section 21774.5 (d) permits a City Council majority vote (two-thirds) to override the ALUC decisions if certain findings are made and certain Conditions are adhered to by the project. These findings are included in the Findings Section of the Staff Report. Staff has added the ALUC recommended Conditions of Approval to the Conditions of Approval of the project in the event the City Council's decides to override ALUC's decision. Land Use Compatibility The Development Code requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit for religious facilities in the Very Low Density Residential zones. This approval is contingent upon making certain findings, which are included in the Findings Section of the Staff Report. One of the main issues to consider in these findings is the compatibility of the proposed use with the surrounding areas. The proposed use is compatible with the religious facility to the west. Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa surround the site to the north and east. The project is also proposed to buffer the residential lot to the south of the site by the 36,000 square foot open space area and an approximately 60' difference between the parking lot grade and the top of the hill at the property line. R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace P~esbyterian Church~Smff Report 6-184)3.doc 3 Site Layout and Access The long and narrow shape of the lot dictated splitting the parking lot into two parts on either side of the building to provide a reasonable walking distance from the spaces to the buildings. Large plaza areas are proposed between and adjacent to the proposed buildings to be used for social functions. The southern end of the site is proposed to be left in its natural state since the grades increase, as they get closer to the southern property line. Because of the steep grade of Calle Medusa in this portion of the site, a third driveway closer to the south end of the property was eliminated by staff leaving the site with two full movement access points to Calle Medusa and one "enter only" drive aisle along Nicolas Road. In addition, because of this grade difference, no roof-mounted equipment is proposed and the trash enclosure includes a trellis to limit views. The project conforms to all of the development regulations of the Development Code. Parking The project is providing the parking lot in two phases. The first phase of the parking lot provides 104 spaces. The required number of spaces for this phase is 101 spaces based on 3,550 square feet of assembly area in the fellowship hall. At project build out, 151 parking spaces are provided. The required number of spaces at build out is 150 spaces based on the 450-seat sanctuary. This calculation is based on two assumptions. First, the parents of the children attending the Sunday school will also be attending the onsite chumh service at the same time. Second, only one of the assembly areas will be used at any given time. Therefore, the parking calculations are based on the largest assembly area, which is the 450-seat sanctuary. Architectural Design The architectural design of the permanent buildings is consistent with the intent of the Citywide Design Guidelines and the Development Code. The variations in building form, materials, and colors will present a visual interest from the streets and will maintain a balance of scale, form and proportion with the surrounding area. The first phase of the project includes a 60' x 48' temporary modular building, which will be used for classrooms. This building will be removed when the second phase is completed. The Development Code includes different standards for modular buildings based on whether they are visible or not visible from public streets. The proposed modular building is visible from Calle Medusa and Nicolas Road. The Development Code requires modular buildings visible from public street to have similar architecture to permanent structures such as accentuated entrances, pop-out features, windows integrated with minimal design compatibility components listed above. The Development Code also indicates that supplemental landscaping may also be required to further screen these structures. Modular buildings not visible from a street or a public gathering place are required to have minimal design compatibility with the surrounding area. Examples of minimal design compatibility include the use of exterior trim elements, similar colors, and other features to soften the modular appearance of the structure. The proposed modular includes exterior fagade text coat similar to the exterior plaster for the main structure with the same color. It also includes text coat cornices at the top edge of roofline, text coat finish trim as a bottom band around structure, and text coat trims around the windows. The unit also includes exterior mounted HVAC units on the sides of the structure. In staff's opinion, the applicant has attempted to "dress-up" the modular unit; however, we have not concluded that they meet the requirements of the Development Code for modular structures visible from the street. Therefore, R:\C U Px2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 4 landscaping is proposed to screen the modular units from the street by placing 24" and 36" box trees around the modular building. In addition, the Phase 1 Fellowship Hall and the berming directly between Calla Medusa and the modular structure further screens it from the street. Since it is difficult to completely ascertain from which angles the modular will be visible from the street, staff has added a Condition of Approval #31 to require additional landscaping after the project is completed if it is needed. Staff believes with the proposed landscaping and the Condition of Approval #31, the modular structure will be sufficiently screened from the street. Environmental Determination Staff has prepared and circulated an Initial Study and determined that the project could potentially result in significant environmental impacts, unless mitigation measures are included as conditions of approval. Based on those findings, staff has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) will satisfactorily comply with the regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The impacts of primary significance are Cultural Resoumes and Hazards and Hazardous Materials. CONCLUSION Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the Development Code and City's Design Guidelines and conforms to all of the applicable development regulations. Since the ALUC found the proposed use to be inconsistent with the French Valley Airport Land Use Plan, the City Council has to override the ALUC recommendation. Therefore, the entire project has to be approved by the City Council. FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.04.010E) The proposed Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The General Plan Land Use Designation and the Zoning of the property is Very Low Density Residential and religious facilities require a Conditional Use Permit in this Designation. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The use is compatible with the religious facility to the west. It is surrounded by Nicolas Road and Calla Medusa to the north and east. It is also proposing to buffer the residential lot to the south of the site by the 36,000 square foot open space area and substantial grade difference. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and other development features. As indicated on the Site Plan and Landscape Plan, the proposed project meets these requirements and all the requirements of the Development Code. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Since the proposed project meets all Development Code requirements and will all the applicable building codes, and is compatible with the adjacent land uses, is not detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the community. R:\C U P~2002\02~257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchXStaff Report 6-18-03.doc 5 The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council. The Staff report along with all the exhibits, and the entire record of the project file represent the entire record for the proposed project and support these findings. Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F) The proposed use is in conformance with the objectives and applicable provisions of the General Plan, Development Code, and the Design Guidelines. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed development. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and all construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site. Airport Land Use Commission Decision Override In approving the override of ALUC's decision, the City has considered providing for orderly development of the French valley Airport as the City has considered and consulted the French Valley Airport Land Use Plan (FALUP) and has considered protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the public. The City supports the development of the airport in the next 20 years; and the City has considered preserving the approaches to the runways as the City has recognized the FALUP in the City's General Plan. Section 3.4.5 of the FALUP states that it maybe impractical in all areas to encourage strict land use controls within the TPZ. The proposed project is in the outer edge of the TPZ. The applicant has considered alternative sites to completely or partially move their facility out of the TPZ; however, as an institution with limited resources has not been successful in obtaining a site outside this TPZ. The applicant has also considered moving the proposed use on the site as recommended by the ALUC; however, the site is not large enough to make this move. The City has considered the noise impacts of the airport on the proposed use and has determined that the interior noise levels of the proposed use will meet the General Plan's maximum permitted noise for public institutional uses such as the proposed use. The General Plan requires maximum of 50 CNEL interior noise level for these uses and the ALUC requires 45 CNEL. Since conventional construction is capable of reducing noise by approximately 20 dB and the site Ps located outside the 55 CNEL, as indicated in City's General Plan and the ALUC's letter, the proposed use will conform to both City's and ALUC's standards. Therefore, the existing noise levels are not excessive and a noise study will not be required. The City ensures compliance with interior noise levels of all development with the General Plan requirements by requiring noise analysis when they are deemed necessary. However, since the 65 CNEL is outside the City Limits, no projects will be subject to these studies as a result of the airport operations. The City has considered the safety compatibility of the proposed use with the French Valley Airport and has found the use to be compatible. This decision was based on the fact that the FALUP only discourages the proposed use and does not prohibit the use nor does it determine the use to be incompatible with the airport. Other developments currently exist in the TPZ including homes, schools, and churches. Therefore, nearby residents are aware of R:\C U PX2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchXStaff Report 6-18-03.doc 6 the airport, which make the proposed use a community norm. The City has determined that the existing safety risk to both people and property on the ground and to the occupants of the aircrafts are held to a minimum since the site does not lay in the direct flight path of the runways and the height limit of the proposed buildings comply with the ALUC requirements as stated in the ALUC's staff report and the proposed project does not increase this safety risks for the same reasons, Attachments 3. 4. 5. 6. PC Resolution - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 13 ALUC Staff Report - Blue Page 26 ALUC Decision Letter - Blue Page 27 Statement of Operations - Blue Page'28 Letter of Justification - Blue Page 29 Exhibits - Blue Page 30 A. Vicinity Map B. General Plan Map C. Zoning Map D. Site Plan (Phase 1) D1. Site Plan (Phase I and 2) E. Grading Plan F. Building Elevations Fl. Building Elevations F2. Building Elevations F3, Building Elevations F4. Building Elevations G. Floor Plan Gl. Floor Plan H. Landscape Plan R:\C U P~2002\024)257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 7 ATFACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- R:\C U P~2002~02-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchXStaff Report 6-184)3.dec 8 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0257, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A CHURCH FACILITY IN TWO PHASES TO INCLUDE A FELLOWSHIP HALL WITH ADMINISTRATION AND CLASSROOM AREAS, A TEMPORARY MODULAR CLASSROOM BUILDING, A 450 SEAT CHURCH SANCTUARY WITH YOUTH ROOM, AND ADDITIONAL CLASSROOMS TOTALING 23,770 SQUARE FEET AT BUILD-OUT AND TO OVERRIDE THE AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION DECISION THAT DETERMINED THE PROPOSED USE TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN ON THE 5.98 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE MEDUSA AND NICHOLAS ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 957-140-010 WHEREAS, Herron & Rumansoff Architects, filed Planning Application No. PA02-0257 Conditional Use Permit & Development Plan "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 18, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff end interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the proposed project to the City Council subject Conditions of Approval to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Sections 17.04.010E & 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. R:\C U Px2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6~18-03.doc 9 The General Plan Land Use Designation and the Zoning of the property is Very Low Density Residential and religious facilities require a Conditional Use Permit in this Designation. B. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The use is compatible with the religious facility to the west. It is surrounded by Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa to the north and east. It is also proposing to buffer the residential lot to the south of the site by the 36,000 square foot open space area and substantial grade difference. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and other development features. As indicated on the Site Plan and Landscape Plan, the proposed project meets these requirements and all the requirements of the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Since the proposed project meets all Development Code requirements and will all the applicable building codes, and is compatible with the adjacent land uses, is not detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the community. E. The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council. The staff report along with all the exhibits, and the entire record of the project file represent the entire record for the proposed project and support these findings. F. The proposed use is in conformance with the objectives and applicable provisions of the General Plan, Development Code, and the Design Guidelines. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed development. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance. G. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and all construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site. H. In approving the override of ALUC's decision, the City has considered providing for orderly development of the French Valley Airport as the City has considered and consulted the French Valley Airpod Land Use Plan (FALUP) and has considered protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the public. R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church[Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 10 The City supports the development of the airport in the next 20 years; and the City has considered preserving the approaches to the runways as the City has recognized the FALUP in the City's General Plan. Section 3.4,5 of the FALUP states that it maybe impractical in all areas to encourage strict land use controls within the TPZ. The proposed project is in the outer edge of the TPZ. The applicant has considered alternative sites to completely or partially move their facility out of the TPZ; however, as an institution with limited resources has not been successful in obtaining a site outside this TPZ. The applicant has also considered moving the proposed use on the site as recommended by the ALUC; however, the site is not large enough to make this move. I, The City has considered the noise impacts of the airport on the proposed use and has determined that the interior noise levels of the proposed use will meet the General Plan's maximum permitted noise for public institutional uses such as the proposed use, The General Plan requires maximum of 50 CNEL interior noise level forthese uses and the ALUC requires 45 CNEL. Since conventional construction is capable of reducing noise by approximately 20 dB and the site is located outside the 55 CNEL, as indicated in City's General Plan and the ALUC's letter, the proposed use will conform to both City's and ALUC's standards. Therefore, the existing noise levels are not excessive anda noise study will not be required. The City ensures compliance with interior noise levels of all development with the General Plan requirements by requiring noise analysis when they are deemed necessary. However, since the 65 CNEL is outside the City Limits, no projects will be subject to these studies as a result of the airport operations. J. The City has considered the safety compatibility of the proposed use with the French Valley Airport and has found the use to be compatible. This decision was based on the fact that the FAL UP only discourages the proposed use and does not prohibit the use nor does it determine the use to be incompatible with the airport. Other developments currently exist in the TPZ including homes, schools, and churches. Therefore, nearby residents are aware of the airport, which make the proposed use a community norm. The City has determined that the existing safety risk to both people and property on the ground and to the occupants of the aircrafts are held to a minimum since the site does not lay in the direct flight path of the runways and the height limit of the proposed buildings comply with the ALUC requirements as stated in the ALUC's staff report and the proposed project does not increase this safety risks for the same reasons. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Staff has prepared and circulated an Initial Study and determined that the project could potentially result in significant environmental impacts, unless mitigation measures are included as conditions of approval. Based on those findings, staff has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) will satisfactorily comply with the regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The impacts of primary significance are Cultural Resoumes and Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally recommends approval the proposal to the City Council as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. R:\C U P~2002\02 0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.d0c 11 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 18t~ day of June 2003. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of June, 2003, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\C U PX2002\02 J3257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchXStaff Report 6-18-03,doc 12 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Shaff Report 6q 8-03.doc 13 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA02-0257 Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan Project Description: To construct, establish and operate a church facility in two phases, Phase I includes a 10,500 square foot fellowship hall with administration and classroom areas and a 2,880 square feet modular classroom building totaling 13,380 square feet; Phase 2 includes a 10,670 square foot, 450 seat church sanctuary, youth room, with an additional 2,660 square feet of classroom area and removal of the modular classroom building totaling 13,270 square feet; the total square footage of the fellowship hall and the sanctuary buildings for the project at build out is 23,770; to override the Airport Land Use Commission decision that determined the proposed use to be inconsistent with the French Valley Airport Land Use Plan. Development Impact Fee Category: Exempt Assessor's Parcel No.: 957-140-010 Approval Date: June 18, 2003 Expiration Date: June18,2005 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own R:\C U PL2002\02q)257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 14 selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Site Plan, Grading Plan, Building Elevation, Floor Plan, Landscape Plan, and Color and Material Board contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. The "Natural Undisturbed Open Space" area depicted on the Site Plan shall remain as open space and shall not be developed. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Color and Material Board, contained on file with the Community Deveiopment Department - Planning Division. Roof Tile Exterior Plaster: Exterior Plaster Accent: Exterior Plaster Tim/Gutters: Window Surrounds Window Frames Glazing Auburn Flat "Slate" Concrete Tile #430 Frazee #8640W "Creative White" Frazee #8644M "Seal Beach" Frazee #8645D "Greylock" Concrete Clear Anodized Solar Gray R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Shaft Report 6-184)3.dcc 15 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated May 6, 2002, on file with the Community Development Department- Planning Division, unless superceded by these conditions of approval. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. Regular hours of operation shall be between 8:00 AM and 12:00 PM for Sunday Services, and Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM fro administrative purposes. The maximum permitted capacity of this facility at any given time shall not exceed the 450- seat sanctuary (the fellowship hall cannot be used at the same time if the sanctuary hall is at capacity). This maximum capacity is based on the number of parking spaces provided. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 16. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 17. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved colored architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 18. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 19. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 20. All the Airport Land Use Commission Conditions of Approval shall be satisfied. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 21. 22. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. 23. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 24. No roof-mounted equipment is permitted that is not fully enclosed by architectural features of the buildings. R:kC U PX2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 16 25. The landscape plans shall be modified to include vines on the walls along the western property lines and be trained and maintained to go over the wall to the opposite side of the wall. 26. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved landscape plans, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 27. All the Airport Land Use Commission Conditions of Approval shall be satisfied. 28. All chain link fencing shall be replaced with wrought iron. Prior to Building Occupancy 29. Prior to occupancy of Phase 1, the property owner shall fully install all landscaping and irrigation indicated on the landscape plans 30. Prior to occupancy of Phase 2, the property owner shall fully re-install all damaged landscaping in accordance to the approved plans. 31. Submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. 32. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 33. Additional trees, with the location, size, and species to be determined by City staff, shall be planted, as deemed appropriate by Planning staff, to sufficiently screen the modular building from public streets. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. R:\C U PX2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 17 General Requirements 34. A Grading Permit for a precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 35. 36. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. All improvement plans, grading plans, shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 37. The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing and striping b. Storm drain facilities c. Sewer and domestic water systems d. Under grounding of existing utility distribution lines Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 38. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 39; 40. 41. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works, A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 42. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. R:\C U P~2~'2\024)257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 64 8-03.doc 18 43. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 44. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Planning Department c. Department of Public Works 45. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 46. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 47. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 48. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 49. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401 and 402. e. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries. f. Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. g. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. h. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. i. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through a storm drain system and discharge to the nearest storm water facility. R:\C U ~2002\02 0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03 doc 19 50. The Developer shall design and guarantee the construction the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Nicholas Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' RA, V) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Improve Calle Medusa (Collector Road Standards - 66' RA, V) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 51. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. 52. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 53. The Proposed driveway on Nicholas Road shall be restricted to "right-in" only. 54. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Calle Medusa and Nicholas Road. 55. All access rights, on Calle Medusa & Nicholas Road shall be restricted to those shown on the site plan. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City Council for dedication to the City. 56. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 57. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 58. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 59. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 60. A Certification of Compliance shall be approved and recorded creating this parcel as a legal lot. R:\C U Pt2002\02-0257 Grace Fresby~rian Church~Staff Report 6-184}3.doc 20 61. 62. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT 63. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in fome at the time of building, plan submittal. 64. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commemial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1750 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a total fire flow of 2150 GPM with a 3 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 65. 66. 67. 68. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Iii-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of I hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off- site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchgSlaff Report 6-18-03.doc 21 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency pdor to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Associatipn 24 1-4.1 ) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) R:\C U PL2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 22 78. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 79. Ail manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 80. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 81. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or abovegmund tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 82. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 83. If there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/AmView compatibleformat and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition. 84. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) COMMUNITY SERVICES GENERAL CONDITIONS 85. All perimeter landscaping including the parkway within the right-of-way, fencing and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or private maintenance association. 86. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 87. The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure area. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 23 88. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. 89. If additional arterial streetlights are to be installed as a result of this project, prior to issuance of building permit or the installation of street lighting on Calle Medusa or Nicolas Road, which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit the approved Edison streetlight improvement plans and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD maintenance program. BUILDING AND SAFETY 90. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 91. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 92. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 93. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 94. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 95. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 96. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 97. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 98. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 99. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 100. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 101. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 24 102. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 103. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 104. Show all building setbacks. 105. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays OUTSIDE AGENCIES 106. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval set forth in the Airport Land Use Commission transmittal dated October 18, 2002, a copy of which is attached. 107. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval set forth in the EMWD transmittal dated December 26, 2002, a copy of which is attached. 108. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated June 26, 2002, a copy of which is attached. 109. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval set forth in the Ranch California Water District transmittal dated May 22, 2002, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Name printed Date R:\C U P~2002\024)257 Grace Presbyterian Cht~ch~qtaff Report 6-18413.doc 25 CHAIR William Cobb Corona/Riverside ViCE CHAIRMAN Allen Graft Hemet COMM~S~NERS Paul Bell Moreno Valley Walt Snyder Palm Desert RicStephens R~emide Marge Tandy City of Hemet STAFF Kelth D. Downs Executive Director A.LC.P., A.A.A.E 5555 Mngt0n A~e. ~,CA 92504 Te~ (909) 351-07~ x204 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION RIVERSIDE COUNTY October 18, 2002 City of Temecula, Planning Dept. P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attn: Matthew Harris AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION (ALUC) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW File No.: FV-02-108 Related File: PA-02-0257 Dear Applicant: On October 17, 2002, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), found the above project inconsistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the French Valley Airport. If the City should wish to override the Commission as per PUC 21774.5(d) it should be subject to the following conditions: Provide Avigation Easements to the French Valley Airport prior to final issuance of any permit. Incorporate noise attenuation measure into any building construction to ensure interior noise levels are at or below 45-decibel levels. Install hooded or shielded outdoor lighting to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky (lights must be downward facing). 4. No obstruction of the "FAR Part 77 Conical Surface" shall be permitted. 5. The following uses shall be prohibited: (a) Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aimraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aimraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. (b) Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. Page 2 October 18, 2002 (c) Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. (d) Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. Should you have any questions regarding this action, please contact me at (909) 351- 07OO. Sincerely, RIVERSIDE COU,~,TY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION Keit~l~. Downs, A.I.C.P., A.AiA.E. Executive Director KDD:jg CC: ALUC Staff Grace Presbyterian Church F:~S hared~DCOM~AIRPORTS~ALU C~"V~)2-108.LTR.d0c ;1NCE 195( Board of Directors Richard R. Hall Marion V. Ashley Randy A. Record David J. Slawson General Manager Anthony J. Pack Direaor of the l)~e~a of So. calif. Joseph J. Kuebler, CPA Legal Counsel Redwine and SherrilI December 26, 2002 City of Temecula Planning Department PO BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dear Colleague: Re: SAN53-Sewer Will Serve PA 02-0257, Grace Presybterian Church Facility, located at the southwest corner of Calle Medusa and Nicholas Road EMWD is willing to provide sewer service to the subject project. The provisions of service are contingent upon the developer completing the necessary arrangements in accordance with EMWD rules and regulations. EMWD expects the developer to provide proper notification when a water demand assessment is required pursuant to Senate Bill 221 and/or 610. EMWD expects the developer to coordinate with the approving agency for the proper notification. Further arrangements for service from EMWD may also include plan check, facility construction inspection, jurisdictional annexation, and payment of financial participation charges. The developer is advised to contact EMWD's New Business Development Department eady in the entitlement process to determine the necessary arrangements for service. EMWD's ability to serve is subject to limiting conditions, such as water shortages, regulatory requirements, legal issues, or conditions beyond EMWD's control. Thank you for your cooperation in serving our mutual customers. If you have any questions, please call me at (909) 928-3777, ext. 4447. Sincerely, Fred Azimie Civil Engineering Associate II New Business Development Dept. FA~w Cc: Russell Rumansoff Mailing Address: G:~ACC ESS\N ew_Busi\DA D~ArchJves\Yea r2002\PA02-0257.doc Post Office Box 8300 Perris, CA 92572-8300 Telephone: (909) 928-3777 Fax: (909) 928-6177 Location: 2270 Trumble Road Perris, CA 92570 Internet: www. emwd.org DAVID P. ZAPPE General Manager-Chief Engi~? ] VERS )E COUNTY PLOOd CONt O 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909.955.1200 909.788.9965 FAX 51180.1 City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: /~ ~.faLJc/~ ~,~ H~D"t"i<~ . Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: ~:)/~ 0 '2. - O '~. ~'7 The Distdct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check ci~ land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate lettem or other flood hazard rej~.rts for such cases. District commentS/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District includi .n.g District Master Drainage Plan facilities other recjional flood control and dra nage faci ties which could be consiaereo a logical componeraor ext.ension of a.master p~a,n system. and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addiaon, inmrmation at a genera~ nature as provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the f~lowi_ng .che.,cked com.rn.ent.s do. ,not in ,any .w-~..y constitute or imply District approval or endomement of the proposed pmjec~ wire respect to ~ooa nezera, pumic health and safety or any other such issue: V/~- This pr.oject would not b? impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor ara other facilities of regional tnterast proposed. Th s project involves ~strict Ma...s.t. er Plan.facilities.. T~.e .D. is~ct.wi!l a. ccept .o~em. hi.[p ~ .su.ch fa.cilia,es oq written request of the uity. Facilities must De conslructeo to uistric~ stanaarns and UlSmC[ plan. check .a.na inspaction will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative tees will De required. Th s pFoje~t, pmpos.es, cha. nnals, s. torm .drains. 36.inches or. I,arger.in .did. meter, or other facilities that could be conslderso regional in nature ana~or a logical extension or me aeoptso Master Drainage Plan. The District would cons_i.der, accepti_ng ,o~em.h~D .at. s.u .c~ ta~lfl~e.s on..wntten ..mque~..t. of the City. Fa~ itl .e~ must b9 cons_.lz~mted, to ?Lstdct .s.ta. ndam.s, a. na. ?l.s~.~ plan be mqulr6d for u~stfict acceptance. ~ an caect(, inspecaon an~ aemlmstraave tees w# De required. ~/ This project is located within the Ii.mits of the Distrtct'.s /~rr;~n~. ~V'~/~a.~,~ ~f'~ {/(Y. Ama Drainage Plan tar .which .drainage ~ees have .begn- ap.opted; applicable taes. s. hq.u!.d be paid.by Oashi~s check or money omar amy to the Flood Comrol uistrict prior m issuance o!. ou,o~ .rig or graom~permris~ · whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of me actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project ma), require a National Pollutant ..Discharge .E!!minafion.System, (NPDES) .pem~.i.t ko.m. the. State .W..~er Resources Control Board. Clearance ~or grading, recomaaou, or omar nnal approva/snoulO not De g~ven unsl me City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. f this project inv..olves a Fedem. ! Em.erg.en..cy Man.age.m..ent Age. ncy (FE.MA~ mapped fla..od plain, then.the Ci~ FES~d require the applicant to provide all stuaies[ calculations, inane anG omar imormaaon r_e~_ ulrea to mae requirements and should further require that lhe applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grad rig, recordation or other final approval' bf the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped tiood plain is impacted by this project, the. City. s..hould req.uire..~e alpp. li.carntAtc~ obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from~ the California uepartment..of Fisn and ~a. me an9 a ui. ean water. Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army ~orps of .Engi.n_e~.rs, or..wnae, n. ~corr.e. spo.n~.e.n..ce tro~m .m..es~e a.(&en.~...es indicating the prgject is axe. rapt from theserequ~ram..e, ras.. A_UI .ep...n _war.er ?_ct ~ .e~o.n 4.u3.wmer may be required fTom the local California ~<egiona! wmer ~uafity Uomro~ uoam pnor to ~ssuance or me ~orps permit. STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer Date: May 22, 2002 Matthew Harris, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 29 AS SHOWN IN BOOK 1, PAGES 44, 45, AND 46; APN 957-140-010 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0257 GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH Dear Mr. Harris: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 02~SB:at 10 BF012-T6WCF ATFACHMENT NO. 2 ALUC STAFF REPORT R:\C O P~2002\02:0257 Grace Presbyterian Ch~ rchXS~affReport~6~[8~03 d~c O(]T 5 COUNTY OF AI ORT LAND USE CO SSION STAFF.REPORT AGENDA ITEM: HEARING DATE: October 17, 2002 CASE SUMMARY CASE ~ER: ' APPROVING ~SDICTION: ~SDiCTION CASE NO.: FV-02-108 Grace Presbyterian Church City of Temecula PA-02-0257 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project is the ultimate construction of a 26,170 sq. ~, church campus with a capacity erg00 people on 3.96 acres. PROJECT LOCATION: The site is situated west of Calle Medusa, south Nicholas Road in the City of Temecula, 9,500- 10,500 feet south east of the French Valley Airport. .. Adjacent Airport: French Valley Airport a. Airport Influence Area: b. Land Use Policy: c. Noise Levels: Traffic Pattem Zone Influence Area below 55 dB CNEL MAJOR ISSUES: Land Use: The proposed site is located approximately 9,500-10,500 feet southeast of the south end of the runway and is within the Traffic Pattern Zone. The Traffic Pattern Zone' discourages' uses such as auditoriums, schools and stadiums. 'Discouraged' uses are required by the plan (7-7) to show that alternative locations have been considered and are not feasible. The applicant is then to be directed to consider a plan that will minimize the exposure to hazard such as moving the usage or considering satellite locations for some of the activities. Moving the structures approximately 200 feet south would place all of the structure outside of the plan boundary. Noise: The project is outside of the 55 CNEL as indicated/n the 1994 Master Plan (2013) for the airport (See Exhibit A). The use is a 'noise sensitive use'. Noise reduction measures should be incorporated into the construction in order to achieve an interior annual noise level atlributed to StaffReport Page 2 exterior sources, not to exceed 45 CNEL. That may require more than normal constmction, which only attenuates up to 20dB. Any acoustical analysis should include aviation noise into that analysis Height: The elevation on the site ranges from 1207 MSL, and the structures are as high as 45 feet the runway ground elevation is 1,340-1,347 MSL feet. The Part 77 horizontal and conical surface is overlying this are at 1500MSL- 1525 MSL, and no portion of the project intrudes upon that airspace. Part 77 obstructions are not a concern. RECO~NDATION: Staff would recommend that the Commission find the proposal inconsistent with the French Valley Airport Land Use Plan. Addendum: October 17: Commissioner Pratt has requested that the item be reconsidered andthe commission agreed on September 19, 2002. ¢om)moNs: For the City to utilize should they wish to override the Commission as per PUC 21774.5(d). Provide Avigation Easements to the French Valley Airport prior to the issuance of any permit for the entire parcel. Incorporate noise attenuation measures into the building construction to ensure interior noise lev~!~.ar_e.alor be!~°w 45.-decibel !evels and any acoustical analysis should include aviation noise. Install hooded or shielded outdoor lighting to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky (lights must be downward facing). 5. The following uses shall be prohibited: (a) Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in aninitial straight etimb following takeoff or toward an aircraf~ engaged in a straight'final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. Amy use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoffor towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a la~dlng at an airport. (c) Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. StaffRepo~t Page 3 (d) Any use which would generate eleclrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. F:~Shared~EDCOM~lRPORTS~ALUC~V-02-108.sr.oc~.doc ,! I '1 A'I'TACHMENT NO. 3 ALUC DECISION LETFER RIVEE$IDE CHAIR William Cobb Corona/Riverside VICE CHNRMAN Nlen Graft Hemet COMMBSDNERS Paul Bell Moreeo Valley Walt Snyder Palm Desert Ric Stephens Rive~ide Ua~e Tandy City of Hemet O ,Sam Pratt Temecula STAFF Keith D. Downs Executive Director A.I.C.P., AA.A.E Tm': (909) 351~0700 x204 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION RIVERSIDE COUNTY October 18, 2002 City of Temecula, Planning Dept. P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attn: Matthew Harris RE: AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION (ALUC) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW File No.: FV-02-108 Related File: PA-02-0257 Dear Applicant: On October 17, 2002, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), found the above project inconsistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the French Valley Airport. If the City should wish to overdde the Commission as per PUC 21774.5(d) it should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide Avigation Easements to the French Valley Airport prior to final issuance of any permit. 2. Incorporate noise attenuation measure into any building construction to ensure interior noise levels are at or below 45-decibel levels. 3. Install hooded or shielded outdoor lighting to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky (lights must be downward facing). 4. No obstruction of the "FAR Part 77 Conical Surface" shall be permitted. 5. The following uses shall be prohibited: (a) Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aimraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aimraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. (b) Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. Page 2 October 18, 2002 (c) Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. (d) Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. Should you have any questions regarding this action, please contact me at (909) 351- 07OO. Sincerely, RIVERSIDE COU...~ AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION KDD:jg ALUC Staff Grace Presbyterian Church F:~Shared~EDCOM~RPORTSW,.UC~W)2-108.LTR.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 4 STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS R:\C U P~2002\02~}257 Cnace Presbyterian Ch~Ch~Staff Report 6-184)3.doc _architects,_inc DATE : May 6, Z00Z ,?~ !~!.~ ' ' ~= TO : City of Temecula Pl~nning Department !U',' JUL 3 1 2002 , FROM : Russell P. Rnmansoff SUBJECT : Statement of Operations Grace Presbyterian Church Hours and days of operation: Monday thru Friday 9:00am - 1:00 pm Administration Office o.nly, minimal traffic and use of project site. Services: Sunday 8:00am-12:00pm Number of employees: 2-3 Amount of required parking: 150 parking spaces provided for Phase II Sanctuary seating 450 people. Amount of average daily trips generated: Weekly, Monday-Friday 10 per day Sunday 100 per day Type of equipment or processes used: None Description of hazardous materials (existing and new): None Other descriptions that effectively describe the proposed use: The Church is a _typical "Church" Facility_ used for administration purposes during the week and for services on Sunday. Classroom facilities are for Sunday School only. No daycare or church school facility is proposed at this time. JGRR7902 _530 St_ Johns Place Hemet, California 92543 909 652-4431 909 652-D373 Fax. _27349.~fferson Avenu~ Suite 206 Temecula, Cdiforria 92~o90 ~ 909 652-D373 Fax ATTACHMENT NO. 5 LETTER OF JUSTIFICATION R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff _architects,_inc : May 6, 2002 TO : FROM : SUBJECT : City of Temecula Planning De Russell P. Rnmansoff~< Letter of Justification Grace Presbyterian ChUrch ~artment is the site suitable and adequate for the proposed use ? - Yes The site is served by an existing street system The site is served by all utilities The site is sized sufficiently to provide adequate space for the proposed use with substantial open space remaining. Would the proposed use and design have a substantial adverse effect on traffic circulation and on the planned capacity of the street system ?- No The proposed use and design will not have an adverse effect on traffic circulation or on the planned capacity of the street system. The use is an "off-peak" _type of use in that the majori _ty of traffic generated by the project would occur on Sunday morning., Traffic during the week would be minimal with no significant impact on the traffic or planned capaci _ty of the street system. Would the proposed use have a substantial adverse impact on the general welfare of the persons residing in the community ? - No The proposed use would not have any substantial adverse impact on the general welfare of the persons residing in the communi _ty. The proposed project would not create or omit offensive, hazardous or excessive quantities of dust, dirt smoke, noise, fumes odors or vibrations or create fire, explosion or other hazards. There shall be no use of hazardous and/or toxic chemicals or waste upon or within the project site. Construction of a Church Facility would in fact ' have a Substantial positive impact on the general welfare of the persons residing in the communitT_, _5~St.k:MsPlace Hemet, Cdfc~a9254B <;O9652-443 909652-0373 Fax _27349 Jefferson A~ua Suite 206 Temecda. Cc:~ornia 92590 909 676-D527 909 65242)373 Fax May 6, 2002 RE: Letter of Justification Grace Presbyterian Church Page 2 Is the design of the project compatible with the existing and proposed development within the district and its surroundings ? - Yes The project is designed jo be compatible with existing and proposed development within the District and its surroundings while at the same time. providing a Chumh Facili _ty designed to be compatible in scale with the congregation and community.. The proposed pro_iect is adjacent to the existing Calv.ary Baptist Chumh of Temecula. JGRR7901 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 EXHIBITS a Chttrch~Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 3O CITY OF TEMECULA ect Site CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 18, 2003 VICINITY MAP R:\C U P~2002~02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6-16-03.doc CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP EXHIBIT C - ZONING MAP CASE NO. - PA02-0257 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -JUNE 18, 2003 R:\C U P~002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 33 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT - D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -JUNE 18, 2003 SITE PLAN R:\C U P~002~2-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 34 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT- D1 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -JUNE 18, 2003 SITE PLAN R:\C U P~002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 35 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT -E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -JUNE 18, 2003 GRADING PLAN R:\C U P~.002~)2-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 36 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT -F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -JUNE 18, 2003 BUILDING ELEVATIONS R:\C U P'~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 37 CITY OF TEMECULA U CASE NO. - PA02-0257 i EXHIBIT -Fl PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -JUNE 18, 2003 BUILDING ELEVATIONS R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 38 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT-F2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -JUNE 18, 2003 R:\C U P~002~32-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Reporl 6-18-03.doc 39 CITY OF TEMECULA 0 CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT -F3 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- JUNE 18, 2003 BUILDING ELEVATIONS R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 40 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT -F4 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- JUNE 18, 2003 BUILDING ELEVATIONS R:\C U P~2002~02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 4! CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT -G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 18, 2003 FLOOR PLAN R:\C U P~2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 42 CITY OF TEMECULA il" LJ CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT -Gl PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 18, 2003 FLOOR PLAN R;\C U P~002~2-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church~Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 43 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0257 EXHIBIT -H PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 18, 2003 LANDSCAPE PLAN R:\C U P~002~2-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\Staff Report 6-18-03.doc 44