HomeMy WebLinkAbout082003 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,]
please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the~
City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]~
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Roll Call:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
August 20, 2003 - 6:00 P.M.
Next in Order:
Resolution: No. 2003-050
Commissioner Olhasso
Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio and Chiniaeff
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item no.~t on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For alt other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
I Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of August 20, 2003
R:\PLANCOMtV~Agendas~2003\08-20-03.doc
1
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
New Items
2
Planninq Application No. PA03-0245 Modify the current standards for businesses sellinq
alcoholic bevera.qes to remove the requirement for a conditional use permit for .qrocery
stores and specialty markets, remove separation distance requirements, and revise the local
standards for the concurrent sale of motor vehicle fuel and alcoholic bevera.qes. This
proposal includes makinq equivalent chanqes to the text of previously adopted
commercially-based Planned Deve opment Overlay zonin,q districts (PDO-1, PDO-3, PDO-4,
PDO-5 and PDO-6) located citywide, Day d Hoqan, Principal Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE cl'rY
COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
NOS. 5 AND 6 TO MODIFY THE REGULATIONS FOR
BUSINESSES SELLING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
(PLANNING APPLICATION PA03-0245)"
Planninq Application No. PA03-0272 To construct, establish and operate three professional
office bu Idincls totalin.q 58,625 square feet located on the east side of Rid.qe Park Drive,
south of Rancho California Road within the Crystal Rid.qe Business Park, Matthew Harris,
Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1. Adopt a Negative Declaration;
3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:\PLANCOMM\Agendas~2003\08-20-03.doc
2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-0272 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE THREE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 58,625 SQUARE FEET ON 5.6 ACRES.
THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
RIDGE PARK DRIVE, SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 940-
310-028 & 032.
Planninq Application No's. PA02-0512 a Tentative Parcel Map request to divide 14.48 acres
into 8 parcels, PA03-0233 a Development Plan for a mixed-use professional center
consistin.q of 5 office buildinqs totaling 97,506 square feet and 2 restaurant/retail buildinqs,
totalinq 12,000 square feet, and PA03-0234 a Conditional Use Permit for a self-stora.qe
facility consistinq of a 1-story 1,307 square foot office, three 1-story storaqe buildin.qs and
two 2-story stora.qe buildings for a combined total of 1081844 square feet located on the
north side of Hiqhway 79 South, east of Avenida de Missiones, and the future Rancho
Pueblo Road, known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 959-070-001 thru 003, Thomas Thornsleyl
Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No's. PA02-0512, PA03-0233,
and PA03-0234 based on the Determination of Consistency with a project (PA01-0522)
for which a Negative Declaration was previously adopted pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations;
4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA02-0512 FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30797, A
REQUEST TO DIVIDE 14.48 ACRES INTO 8 PARCELS WITH A
MINIMUM GROSS LOT SIZE OF 43,677 SQUARE FEET,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH,
EAST OF AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, AND THE FUTURE
RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL
NO'S. 959-070-001 THRU 003.
R:\PLANCOMM~gendas~2003\08-20-03.doc
3
4.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-0233 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN
AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN 11.02 ACRE MIXED-USE
PROFESSIONAL CENTER WHICH INCLUDES FIVE OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 97,506 SQUARE FEET, AND TWO
RESTAURANT/RETAIL BUILDINGS, TOTALING 12,000
SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, EAST OF AVENIDA DE MISSIONES,
AND THE FUTURE RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO'S. 959-070-001 THRU 003.
4.4 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-0234 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE OPERATION, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY
CONSISTING OF A 1-STORY 1,307 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE,
THREE 1-STORY STORAGE BUILDINGS AND TWO 2-STORY
STORAGE BUILDINGS FOR A COMBINED TOTAL OF 108,844
SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, EAST OF AVENIDA DE MISSIONES,
AND THE FUTURE RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO'S. 959-070-001 AND 002.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting:
Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
September 3, 2003
R:~PLANCOMhIVkgendas~2003~08-20-03.doc
4
ITEM #2
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August20,2003
Planning Application No. PA03- 0245
(DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - Alcoholic Beverage Sale Regulations)
Prepared by: David Hogan, Principal Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE
17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY NOS. 5 AND 6 TO MODIFY THE
REGULATIONS FOR BUSINESSES SELLING ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES (PLANNING APPLICATION PA03-0245)"
BACKGROUND
At the March 19, 2003 Planning Commission meeting staff presented a report on the Development
Code's provisions relating to the sale of alcohol. Currently, the City's Development Code requires a
conditional use permit for all businesses that sell alcohol including grocery stores, restaurants and
specialty markets such as Trader Joe's or Sprouts. At that meeting, it was staff's recommendation
to not require a conditional use permit for the following uses which currently do require a conditional
use permit: department stores which sell alcohol, grocery stores which sell alcohol, wine tasting and
sales, specialty stores which sell alcohol and restaurants which sell beer and wine only.
At the March 19t~ meeting, the Commission expressed a willingness to modify the current provisions
but requested additional crime incident reporting information to help determine which types of
businesses need to maintain the conditional use permit requirement. These modifications will also
make the Development Code clearer and easier to use and understand. In addition to the general
changes proposed in the commercial and industrial zones, similar changes are also proposed in all
the commercially-based Planned Development Overlays.
ANALYSIS
During the meeting, the Commission requested that staff contact the Police Department to see what
additional information may be available to help determine how to address this issue. Staff also
requested information on restaurants with full bars to help assist in determining whether a
conditional use permit should be required.
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
1
At present, there are 22 restaurants with full bars in Temecula. According to the Police Department,
there have been on-going problems with only three of these establishments. But given the
magnitude of the problems at these three locations, the Police Department and staff recommend
that the CUP requirement for restaurants with full bars be retained. This appears to be the most
effective way to retain control over an occasionally problematic or troublesome business. The CUP
requirement allows the City an opportunity to withdraw its approval for the full bar in a timely and
efficient manner. Staff also contacted several other jurisdictions including the cities of Corona, La
Quinta, Riverside, Escondido and Carlsbad to see how they regulate convenience markets. Only
the cities of La Quinta and Riverside responded. The city of La Quinta requires a CUP for stores
less than 10,000 square feet and open more than 18 hours a day and the city of Riverside requires
that all off premise sale of alcohol require a CUP unless the establishment is larger than 15, 000
square feet and alcohol sales are an incidental component of the business. Based on the
information received from the cities of La Quinta and Riverside, it isstaff's recommendationthatthe
following definitions be used for speciality markets and convenience stores:
A "specialty market" store is a retail sales facility generally in excess of 10,000 square feet and
offering a themed or interrelated type of mechandise that relects a unique or unusual niche in the
marketplace. These goods are generally not offered in general retail sales outlets.
A "convenience store" is generally less than 5,000 square feet and offers a limited selection of a
broad range of general commercial goods. Convenience stores are regularly found in conjunctin
with vehicle fueling stations.
Based upon this, staff is proposing the following delineation for when a conditional use permit is
required for the sale of alcoholic beverages.
Retain CUP Requirement
Bar/Lounge/Nightclub
Convenience Store/Mini Mart (<5,000
square feet)
Liquor Store
Service Station
Restaurant - with a full bar
Would Not Require a CUP
Department Store
Grocery Store
Specialty Market (>10,000 square feet)
Restaurant - beer and wine only
(currently does not require a CUP)
This modification does not affect the requirements of California Alcoholic Beverage Control for
businesses selling alcoholic beverages to obtain a State license.
In addition to this shift in focus, these revisions will also make the requirements clearer to the public
and easier for City staff to implement. A key part of this effort is the creation of several new land use
categories that will more clearly describe whether the uses are permitted or conditionally permitted.
For example:
· "Convenience Market"will be replaced with:
Convenience Market (without the sale of alcoholic beverages)
- and -
Convenience Market (with the sale of alcoholic beverages)
R:\Ordinances'v~coholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PO2.doc
2
· "Restaurants and other eating establishments" will be replaced with:
Restaurants and other eating establishments
(with or without the sale of beer and wine)
- and -
Restaurants and other eating establishments
(with the sale beer, wine and distilled spirits)
Staff is also proposing to add a general category that would address accessory alcoholic beverage
sales for certain uses. This new listing will allow staff to require a conditional use permit for non-
typical alcoholic selling businesses. The most obvious examples include bowling alleys and golf
courses. The proposed changes to the permitted use matrix are contained in Section 1 of
Attachment No. 2.
A part of this proposal is also to modify the supplemental requirements contained in Chapter 17.10
to focus this Section exclusively on the requirements of State law concerning the local consideration
of the concurrent sale motor vehicle fuels and alcoholic beverages. This change is contained in
Section 2 of Attachment No. 2. In addition, the supplemental separation distance requirements are
also proposed for deletion. The Development Code currently requires a 500-foot separation
distance between businesses selling alcoholic beverages and religious institutions, schools and
parks. Staff feels that land use compatibility can be more appropriately addressed through the
normal conditional use permit process than through a rigid separation distance that applies in all
situations regardless of the local conditions.
To complete these changes, staff is also recommending that all the adopted Planned Development
Overlays (PDO's), that have commemial components, also be modified to reflect this approach.
This change will be implemented independently within each PDO. If restaurants and other eating
establishments are allowed in a Planned Development Overlay zone, then the sale of beer and wine
at a restaurant would also be permitted. The proposed revisions for each PDO are shown in
Sections 3 through 7 of the draft ordinance. A copy of the draft ordinance is included in Attachment
No. 2. The current supplemental requirements are included in Attachment No. 3.
If this series of changes is approved, staff will bring forward equivalent changes to the adopted
specific plans at a later date.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed amendment to the Municipal Code would modify how certain allowable businesses in
commercial zones are approved to sell alcoholic beverages by the City. When an application for a
business to operate is filed with the City, a determination will be made at that time, as to the type of
environmental review that is required to comply with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has completed an Initial Environmental Study and has determined that
this ordinance has no potential to impact the environment. As a result, staff is recommending that
the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council make a finding that the proposed
Development Code amendment is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality
Act pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. A copy of the Initial Environmental
Study is located in Attachment No. 4.
R:\Ord[nances\Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
3
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 5
Proposed Ordinance (Exhibit A) - Blue Page 8
Current Development Code - Supplemental Alcohol Standards - Blue Page 15
Planning Commission Staff Report from the March 19, 2003 Meeting - Blue Page 17
Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt from the March 19, 2003 Meeting - Blue Page 18
Initial Environmental Study- Blue Page 19
R:\Ordinances~Alcohollc Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
4
A'I-i'ACHMENT NO. 1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
R:\Ordinances\Alcohotic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
5
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE
17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY NOS. 5 AND 6 TO MODIFY THE
REGULATIONS FOR BUSINESSES SELLING ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES (PLANNING APPLICATION PA03-0245)"
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City Council of the City of Temecula initially adopted
the City's Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the City's Development Code has been periodically amended over time as
needed; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment on August 20,
2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Approval. The Planning Commission for the City of Temecula hereby
recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending the requirements for conditional
use permits for certain businesses selling alcoholic beverages and make other changes
substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The proposed amendment represents a minor
change to the Development Code to modify how businesses selling alcoholic beverages in
commercial zones need to be approved bythe City. When a site specific application is filed with the
City, a determination will be made at that time, as to the type of environmental review necessary to
comply with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. As a result, the Planning
Commission recommends that the City Council make a determination that the proposal is except
from exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section
15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
R:\Ordinances\Alcoho[[c Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
6
Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 6th day of August 2003.
ATTEST:
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do herebythat the PC
Resolution No. 2003- was duly adopted and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of August, 2003, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R~Ordinances~Aicohotic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
7
A'I-I'ACHMENT NO. 2
PROPOSED ORDINANCE (Exhibit A)
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
8
ORDINANCE NO. 03-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
NOS. 5 AND 6 TO MODIFY THE REGULATIONS FOR
BUSINESSES SELLING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA03-0245)
THE CITY COUNCIL' OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends Table 17.08.030 of
the Temecula Municipal Cede as shown below.
A. Deleted the listings for "Alcoholic Beverage Sales" and "Delicatessen".
B. Rename the listing for "Convenience market" to "Convenience market (without the
sale of alcoholic beverages)".
C. Add a listing that reads as follows:
Description of use
Convenience market (With the sale o~ ' C C C C C - '~
alcoholic beverages)
D. Add listings that read as follows:
:::; ; co~meycial/Office/indUSt~ial DiStriCts - ;
Descripti0nofus~ ' NC CC H'r SC PO BP LI,
Incidental alcoholic beverage sales in C C C C C C
conjunction with an otherwise allowable uses
(examples include bowling alleys and golf
courses)
Restaurants and other eating establishments P P P P P P P
(with or without the sale of beer and wine)
E. Delete the listing for Restaurants and other eating establishments and replace it with
the following.
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Reporl PC2.doc
9
Table 17,08.030
Schedule of Permitted Uses
CommerciallOffice/Industrial Districts
Description of Use NC CC HT SC pO BP LI
Restaurants and other eating establishments - C C C _ C .
(with the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits)
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends Table 17.10.020.B
of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"Concurrent Sale of Motor Vehicle Fuel and Alcoholic Beverages.
To comply with the provisions of the Business and Professions Code (Section 23790
et. seq), applications for automotive service stations proposing the concurrent sale of
beer and wine shall be required to comply with the same procedure for noticing and
conducting the public hearing that is utilized for all other conditional use permits.
The decision and findings be based on substantial evidence in view of the whole
record to justify the ultimate decision and shall be based on written findings. The
denial of an application for a CUP is subject to appeal to the city council in
accordance with the provisions of Section 17.03.090 of the Temecula Municipal
Code.
In addition to any other operational standards deemed necessary and appropriate,
the following supplemental standards shall be applied to the concurrent sale of beer
and wine with motor vehicle fuel.
a. No beer or wine shall be displayed within five feet of the cash register or the
front door.
b. No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-up window.
c. No display or sale of beer or wine shall be made from an ice tub.
d. No beer or wine advertising shall be located on motor fuel islands.
e. No beer or wine advertising shall be located on the building, windows, doom,
or on free-standing signage.
f. No self-illuminated advertising for beer or wine shall be located on buildings
or free-standing signage.
g. Employees on duty between the hours of 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. who sell beer or
wine shall be at least 21 years of age."
Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends portions of Pala
Road Planned Development Overlay as described below.
A. Rename the "Pala Road Planned Development Overlay District-l" as the
"Pechanga Parkway Planned Development Overlay District-l" and replace all references of "Pala
Road" in the text to "Pechanga Parkway".
B. Delete the listings for "Alcoholic Beverage Sales" and "Delicatessens".
R:\Ordinances~.lcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Repor[ PC2.doc
10
C. Add the listing for "Incidental alcoholic beverage sales" and replace the listing
for Restaurants and other eating establishments in Table 17.22.106 of the Temecula Municipal
Code to read as follows:
;~. ' Pala Road planned Deveiopment Overlay District~ ::i:':,
· Descripti°n °f Use "~I PDO,1
Convenience Market (with or without the sale of alcoholic beverages) C
Incidental alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with an otherwise
allowable uses (examples include bowling alleys and golf courses)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with or without the sale of beer
P
and wine)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with the sale beer, wine and
distilled spirits)
D. Delete Footnote Number 1 and renumber the remaining footnotes.
Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends portions of
Nicolas/Winchester Planned Development Overlay as described below.
A. Delete the listings for "Alcoholic Beverage Sales" and "Delicatessens".
B. Add the listing for "Incidental alcoholic beverage sales" and replace the listing
for Restaurants and other eating establishments in Table 17.22.126 of the Temecula Municipal
Code to read as follows
!~. · . ' .'. Table 17,22,126
t ~:=~!- ~' ~: ' ' .:. sched,u, leof Permitted Uses
NorthWest Corner of Nicolas & Winchester Roads Planned Development ove~rlay
. ~'; ~ '.._ District . . ' ' .~ ! -~."
'~'i' id ~ '!. , _ . Description of Use , - '1PDO~3
Incidental alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with an otherwise allowable
uses (examples include bowling alleys and golf courses)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with or without the sale of beer
P
and wine)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with the sale of beer, wine, and
distilled spirits)
Section 5. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends portions of
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay as described below.
A. Delete the listings for "Alcoholic Beverage Sales" and "Delicatessens"·
B. Add the listing for "Incidental alcoholic beverage sales" and modify the
listings for Convenience Market and Restaurants and other eating establishments in Table
17.22.136B of the Temecuia Municipal Code with the following:
R:\Ordinances~.lcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
11
Table 17.22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
- Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO'4VS
Convenience market {without the sale of alcoholic beverages) P C
Convenience market (with the sale of alcoholic beverages) C C
Incidental alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with an
otherwise allowable uses (examples include bowling alleys C
and golf courses)
! Restaurants and other eating establishments (with or without p pe
the sale of beer and wine)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with the sale of Ce
beer, wine, and distilled spirits)
C. Delete Footnote Number 1 and renumber the remaining footnotes.
Section 6. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends portions of
uncodifed Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay as described below.
Table 17.22.146.
Delete the listings for "Alcoholic Beverage Sales" and "Delicatessens" from
B. Add the listing for "Incidental alcoholic beverage sales" and replace the listing
for Restaurants and other eating establishments in Table 17.22.146 with the following:
Table 17.22.146
SchedUle of Permitted Uses
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description Of use J AI B
Incidental alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with an
otherwise allowable uses (examples include bowling alleys
and golf courses)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with or C P
without the sale of beer and wine)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with the sale C
of beer, wine and distilled spirits)
C. Delete Footnote Number I and renumber the remaining footnotes.
Section 7. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends portions of Rancho
Pueblo Planned Development Overlay as described below.
A. Delete the listings for "Alcoholic Beverage Sales" and "Delicatessens" from
Table 17.22.166A.
R:\Ordinances~lcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
12
B. Add a listing for "Incidental alcoholic beverage sales" and replace the listing
for Restaurants and other eating establishments in Table 17.22.166A with the following:
;;~ ? SChedule Of Permitted USes ": = ,- ~ :',i · ,
: ~ ~ Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay District, :. ~
:, ~: :~, ~ ,i; .DescrlptlonofUse! ~,, :~ . ' :~ PDO~6
Incidental alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with an otherwise allowable
uses (examples include bowling alleys and golf courses)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with or without the sale of beer P
and wine)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with the sale of beer, wine and
distilled spirits)
Section 8. Environmental Compliance. The proposed amendment represents a minor
change to the Development Code to modify how businesses selling alcoholic beverages in
commercial zones need to be approved by the City. When a site specific application is filed with the
City, a determination will be made at that time, as to the type of environmental review necessary to
comply with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council has
reviewed the information contained in the Initial Environmental Study and hereby finds that the
adoption of this ordinance could have no impact on the environment and the adoption of this
ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section
15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines..
Section 9. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of
this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 10. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of
this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 12. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council
members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City.
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PO2.doc
13
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ~th day of ,2003.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 03- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a.regular
meeting of the City Council on the __th day of ,2003 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was
duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the th day of ,
2003, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:~OrdinancesV~Jcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
14
ATFACHMENT NO. 3
CURRENT DEVELOPMENT CODE - SUPPLEMENTAL ALCOHOL STANDARDS
R:\Ordinances\Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
15
CURRENT ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE REQUIREMENTS
Excerpts of the Temecula Municipal Code - Section 17.10.020.B:
Alcoholic Beverage Sales.
All businesses or establishments offering the sale of alcoholic beverages, except for
the incidental sale of beer and wine at a restaurant, shall require the appropriate
license from the state of California and the city and be subject to a conditional use
permit.
Any automotive service station which proposes to sell beer and wine concurrently
with motor vehicle fuel shall require a conditional use permit which permit shall be
subject to the provisions of Business and Professions Code Section 23790 et seq.
and shall require that:
a. The decision shall be based on written findings.
b. A denial of an application for a conditional use permit is subject to appeal to
the city council in accordance with Section 17.03.090 of this code.
c. The same procedure for noticing, and conducting the conditional use permit
hearing that is utilized by the city for all other conditional use permits shall be
used to provide for all parties to be present and to present evidence.
d. The decision and findings be based on substantial evidence in view of the
whole record to justify the ultimate decision.
The above businesses shall not be located within five hundred feet of any religious
institution, school or public park. The license application shall be reviewed by the
city's police services prior to city approval.
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
16
A'n'ACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FROM THE MARCH 19, 2003 MEETING
R:\Ordinances~Alcohol[c Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
17
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
.Mamh 19, 2003
Conditional use Permit Requirements' for Businesses Selling Alcoholic Beverages
Prepared By: David Hogan, Principal Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Comm ss on
Consider this issue and provide direction to staff on any needed the changes to the
Development Code relating to the regulation of businesses selling alcoholic beverages.
BACKGROUND: Staff has identified the potential need to modify or clarify two aspects of
the Development Code pertaining to the regulation of businesses selling alcoholic beverages.
The first component is to clarify which businesses need a conditional use permit to operate.
DISCUSSION: The Development Code currently requires that any business selling alcoholic
beverages needs a conditional use permit (CUP). This is true whether the business is a grocery
store, department store selling packages of specialty beer, a restaurant, or a liquor store. Staff
is concerned that the current code section may be written too broadly and that requiring a'CUP
for businesses that have little or no probability of problems or secondary impacts could be
unnecessarily regulatory.
In an effort to try to address the underlying issue, staff has identified ten basic categories of
alcohol-selling businesses. These categories seem to represent the universe, of alcohol selling
establishments in the Temecula area. These business types have different potentials to create
adverse impacts on the surrounding community. Examples of these businesses include bars,
lounges, liquor stores, and convenience stores. Other businesses, such as department stores,
grocery stores, and restaurants serving beer and wine generally cause few problems.
Staff suggests that the Commission focus on these ten different business types in attempting to
develop regulations to address community alcohol sales concerns. The ten general categories
of alcohol selling businesses are as follows:
· Bar/Lounge/Nightclub · Grocery Store
· Convenience Store/Mini Mart · Specialty Market
· Liquor Store · Wine Tasting
· Service Station · Restaurant -.with a full bar
· Department or Discount Store · Restaurant - beer and wine only
Staff has considered this matter and has a suggested an alternate delineation for when a
conditional use permit is required. The table below shows this alternative approach and is
intended solely to provide a starting point for the Commission's discussion on this matter.
R:\Ordinances~Afcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PCl.doc
1
Bar/lounge/nightclub
Liquor Store
Convenience Store with the
sale of alcoholic beverages
Service Station with the sale of
alcoholic bevera~les
Restaurant - with full bar
Department Store with the sale
of alcoholic beverages
Grocery Store with the sale of
alcoholic beverages
Wine Tasting and Sales
Specialty or Discount Store with
the sale of alcoholic beverages
Restaurant - beer and wine
only
Yes
No
Yes
No
Based upon the Commission's direction, a development code amendment will be prepared to
further clarify the City's conditional use permit criteria.
R:\OrdinancesV~lcoholic Beverages 2002~Staff Report PCl.doc
2
A'I-I'ACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES EXCERPT FROM THE MARCH 19, 2003 MEETING
R:\Ordinances~,lcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC2.doc
18
3 Director's Hearing Case Update
RECOMMENDATION: ~ .
3.1 Approve the Di~ng Case Update for February, 2003.
MOT,O, . %,,_e_.m_?.
3~d voice vote reflected
u ' us approval.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
4 Conditional Use Permit Requirements for Businesses Selling Alcoholic Beverages -
Dave Hogan, Principal Ranner
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 File and receive.
Principal Ranner Hogan reviewed the staff report (of record), highlighting the City's
current Development Code requirements and the recommended changes.
In response to the Commissioners, Principal Planner Hogan noted the follow lng:
?? That staff would concur with Con~ssioner Telesio's suggestions for staff to
create local factors/impacts/problems in determining the need for a Conditional
Use Permit (CUP);
?? That a Specialty/Discount Store would be characterized as a World
Market/Trader Joe's;
?? That the Discount Store category (Costco) would be currently defined in the
Development Code but that the Specialty Market category is not.
Coi~i~ssioner Mathewson noted that the wine tasting/sales category should be
restricted to ensure that sales are solely limited to wine tasting.
Co~iilssioner Mathewson relayed his concurrence with staff's recommendation
requesting that additional justification be provided with regard to the uses that would no
longer require a CUP.
With regard to the Convenience Store/Mini Mart and Liquor Store categories,
Commissioner Telesio expressed his preference to regulate on an enforcement basis
with proper justification versus on a general regulation basis.
In response to Commissioner Mathewson's comment, Principal Planner Hogan advised
that from staff's perspective the need for a CUP would be easier regulated through the
use versus the success/quality of the business but that staff could analyze information
such as percentage of total sales and determining which percentage is alcohol related.
Pc PlanComnYminutes/031903 2
Because checks and balances are in place through the CUP process, Chairman
Chiniaeff voiced his opinion for no change and concurred with Comnissioner Telesio's
comrf~nt relative to regulation.
Spealdng in support of staff's recomrrendation as it relates to differentiation among the
various categories, Coi¥i~ssioner Olhasso referenced existing checks and balances
through the CUP.
Commissioner Guerriero questioned the number of Convenience Stores/k~ni
Marts/Liquor Stores and gas stations necessary in the City that sell alcohol.
Considering the existing procedures in place, Coi~i~ssioner Telesio spoke in support of
no change.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
5 Plannin.q Application No. PA02-0340 To establish a Comprehensive Land Use
in association with a future retail coi~iYercial shoppin,q center located
southeast and southw est corners of Pechan,qa Parkw ay and
the
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 AdoPt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Plan Application No.
PA02-0340 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section of the California
Environmental Quality Act;
5,2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNII~ COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMEC APPLICATION
NO. 02-0340, A COMPREH! LAND USE PLAN TO
ESTABLISH GUIDELINES THE FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT OF RClAL SHOPPING
COMPLEX ON A '14.3 ITE. THE SITE IS GENERALLY
LOCATED AT SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST
CORNERS OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND PECHANGA
PARKWAY KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS.
961-010-001 ¢ &005.
Planning
be
that staff would recommend that this public hearing
the meeting of April 9, 2003. Having met w ith the applicant and staff,
Telesio noted that the project is progressing and should be ready for the
review by April 9, 2003.
the consensus of the Planning Commission to continue the item to the meeting of
9, 2003.
R: RanComm/minutes/031903 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Staff Report PC;!.doc
19
City of Temecula
I~ P.O. aox 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Project Title Development Code Amendment - Conditional Use
Requirements for Establishments Selling Alcoholic Beverages
(Planning Application 03-0245)
Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
' Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Contact Person and Phone Number David Hogan, Principal Planner (909) 694-6400
Project Location City of Temecula, in Southwest Riverside County.
Project Sponsor's Name and Address City of Temecula
General Plan Designation Not applicable
Zoning Not applicable
Description of Project The proposed project is a general amendment to the Development
Code (Title 17 of Municipal Code) that would modify how
businesses selling alcoholic beverages would be regulated. No
specific land use changes, businesses, or uses would be approved
as part of this project. Generally, the Amendment would make the
following changes:
D · Clarify which types of businesses that sell
alcoholic
beverages are either prohibited, require the approval of a
conditional use permit, or are permitted by right in the
various commercial and industrial zones;
· Add identical Code provisions to all the previously approved
commercially-based planned development overlay zones;
· Remove the standardized separation distances between
alcohol selling businesses and certain other uses; and,
· Clarify the previsions for the concurrent sale of motor vehicle
fuel and alcoholic beverages (as required by State law).
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Citywide applicability
Other public agencies whose approval None
is required
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Initial Study.doc
1
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected I
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Land Use Planning Hazards
Population and Housing Noise
Geologic Problems Public Services
Water Utilities and Service Systems
Air Quality Aesthetics
Transpodation/Circulation Cultural Resources
Biological Resources Recreation
Energy and Mineral Resources Mandatory Findings of Significance
,/ None
Determination
(To be completed by the lead agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
v~ I find that the proposed project will result in no changes to the physical environment and is exempt
__ pursuant to Section 15061 b(_~.~_f the CEQA Guidelines.
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATI~
DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
i find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially
significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Signature Date
Printed name
R:\Ordinances~AIcohollc Beverages 2002\Initial Study.doc
2
For
~. Land Use and Planning. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Signiticant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Suppoctteg Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact impact
a. Physically divide an established community? ,/
b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an
environmental effect?
c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Supporting In formation Sources Impact Incorporated itm@act Impact
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and ,/
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing /
~__ elsewhere?
Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ,/
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project?
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Sigi~ificant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Supporting] Information Sources impact Incorporated , Impact Impact
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Eadhquake Fault Zoning ,,,
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a known fault?
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ,/
iv) Landslides? ,/
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ,/
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project, ,/
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
.~___ ~ubsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial ,/
risks to life or property?
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Initial StUdyldOC
3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project?
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks o r a Iternative w astewater disposal systems
/where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
Potentially
Significant
Potential¥
Signiticant Unless Less Than
Mitigation Significant
4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project?
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfero
substantially with groundwater recharge such t hat t hero
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate
of pro-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or aroa, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or off-site?
Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
~oliuted runoff?
Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard aroa as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
Place within a 100-year flood hazard aroa structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
Pctentialty
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incoq~Oratec
Less Than
Significant
Impact
R:\Ordinances¥~.lcohotic Beverages 2002\Initial Study.doc
4
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the project?
~r Potentially
Potentially Significant unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact incorporated Impact Impact
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ,/
air quality plan?
b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially ,/
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient ,/
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors?
d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ,/
of people?
6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project?
Potentially
Po~entia!!y Significant Unless ' Less Than
Significant ~ Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Suppartin~ Information Sources ImpactIncorporated Impact Impact
a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
D relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity
ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections?
b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that ,/
results in substantial safety dsks?
d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design features
(e.g., sharp curves, dangerous intersections)?
e. Result in inadequate emergency access?
f. Result in inadequate parking capacity?
g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, ,/
bicycle racks?
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project?
P0tentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact InCOrporated Impact Impact
D Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified ,/
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Initial Study.doc
5
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project?
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish a nd Wildlife
Service______.??
Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
Interfere substantially with the movement of any
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat
Potentiarly
Significant
Mitigation Significant
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
~lan?
8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project?
potentia ry
Potentialry Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporafed Impact
Issues and Supporting] Information Sources
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project?
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
a. Create a significant hazard to the pub c or the
I environment through the routine transportation, use, or
~aterials?
J ~nably foreseeable ~pset and
I accident conditions involving t~e release of h;zardous
R:\Ordinances'~Atcohotic Beverages 2002\Initial Study.doc
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project?
~- Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Signiticant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Supportin~ Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
materials into the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely /
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, ,/
would it create a significant hazard to t he public o r t he
environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the v'
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a pdvate airstrip, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or v~
working in the project area?
g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency v~
evacuation plan?
D Expose people or a significant or loss,
structures
to
risk
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where v~
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
10. NOISE. Would the project result in?
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation' Significant No
Issues and Supporting Info~ation Sources ~lmpact incoq~orated trnpact Impact
a. Exposure o f people t o severe noise Ievels i n excess o f
standards established in the local general plan or noise ~
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive v~
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the v~
project?
d. Asubstantialtemporary or periodicincrease in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing v~
without the project?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
D miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the ,~
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002~lnitial Study.doc
7
10. NOISE. Would the project result in?
IsS~d. Su rb~l Information Sources
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
~t area to excessive no se levels?
Potentially Signi§cant Unless Less Than
Signifcant Mitigation Significant
11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have a substantial adverse physical impacts associates
with the provisions of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
ISSues and Supporting Information Soumes
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Potentially
Significant
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project?
Issues and Su@po~n9 Information Sources
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, t he
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the_~ect's solid waste di_~oosal needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes ~
regulations related to solid waste?
Potentiarly
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
R:\Ordinances~Aicoholic Beverages 2002\Initial Study.doc
8
13. AESTHETICS. Would the project?
~ Potentially
Potentially significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant NO
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incoq3orated Impact Impact
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ,/
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building /
within a state scenic highway?
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ,/
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the ,/
area?
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Potent!ally
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant NO
:l~sues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated ' Impact rmpact
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.57
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of ,/
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.57
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
.__ resource or site or uni~ic feature?
Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
15. RECREATION. Would the project:
· Potentially
Poteh~ia!~y Significant Un[ess Less Than
:Significant Mitigation ~igniflcant NO
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational /
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities! v'
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
R:\Ordinances~Alcoholic Beverages 2002\Initial Study.doc'
9
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Issues and Supporting Information Sburces
Does the project have the potential to degrade the qualit
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects?
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR
or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR o{
negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the followinc
on attached sheets.
a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
-b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the
j scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
~ state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c. ~M, itigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
~ (]escribe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the eadier document and
! the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
Comments: The proposed amendment to the Municipal Code would modify how cedain allowable businesses
in commercial zones are approved to operate by the City to sell alcoholic beverages and would change the
City's internal procedure for determining when and where alcoholic beverage could be sold. (The amendment
does not effect the requirements of California Alcoholic Beverage Control.) The proposed amendments would
not directly allow the construction of new buildings or development, it would only address how previously
considered buildings could be used. The proposed changes to the Municipal Code will not have an effect on
the physical environment as described in the questions contained in this Initial Environmental Study. When a
specific application for a business to sell alcoholic beverages is filed with the City, a determination will be made
at that time as to the type of environmental review that is required to comply with the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act. Therefore, this amendment to the Municipal Code is exempt from
environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
R:\Ordinances\Alcoholic Beverages 2002~initial Study.doc
10
ITEM #3
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 20, 2003
Planning Application No. PA03-0272 (Development Plan)
Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
1. Adopt a Negative Declaration;
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA03-0272 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE THREE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 58,625 SQUARE FEET ON 5.6 ACRES.
THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
RIDGE PARK DRIVE, SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
-ALSO-KNOWN-AS ASS ESSORS-PARCEL- NOS: 940-3'tO-02 ~&
032.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Robert Reynolds, Redhawk Communities
PROPOSAL:
To construct, establish and operate three professional office
buildings totaling 58,625 square feet.
LOCATION:
East side of Ridge Park Drive, south of Rancho California
Road within the Crystal Ridge Business Park.
EXISTING ZONING:
Business Park (BP)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: Business Park
South: Business Park
East: Light Industrial
West: Business Park
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Business Park (BP)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
RSD P~2003\03~272 Ridge Park Office Center~StaffReportandCOAs.doc
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Office
South: Vacant
East: Industrial
West: OfficeNacant
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot area (net)
4.8 acres
Total Building Area (Building A) 13,505 square feet
Total Building Area (Building B)
Total Building Area (Building C)
31,615 square feet + 9,830 square feet storage basement
13,505 square feet
Building Height (Building A)
34'-6"
Building Height (Building B)
50'-0"
Building Height (Building C)
34'-6"
Landscaped Area
68,650 square feet (32%)
Parking required
196 spaces
Parking provided
218 spaces
Lot Coverage
24,236 square feet (11%)
BACKGROUND
The applicant is proposing to construct a professional office complex consisting of three buildings
totaling 58,625 square feet. Building B (middle) is the largest and tallest (three-story) building and
will house administrative offices for the Garrett Group LLC and the Better World Foundation. A
9,830 square foot uninhabitable storage basement has also been included in the building. Buildings
A & C are two-stories in height and will be leased as professional office space for either single or
multiple tenants.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Site Plan
The applicant proposes to construct three professional office buildings that are interconnected via
sidewalks and landscaped courtyards resulting in a campus-like atmosphere. The three buildings
will be sited in the center of the property and will be surrounded by dense landscaping and onsite
parking facilities beyond.
The main entrance of each building will face west toward Ridge Park Drive and will be accessed via
a circular drive resulting in a significant entry feature and focal point. An "entry only" ddveway will
serve to connect the circular ddve to Ridge Park Ddve. Two additional 24-foot wide driveways off
Ridge Park Drive are located at the north and south sides of the property. Extensive decorative
paving treatments will be utilized throughout the project site.
R:~D P~2003~03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center,S {ai'~eportandCOAs.doc
2
Architecture
All three buildings will be constructed using a Mediterranean architectural style. The elevations of
each building will have separate and unique features while complementing the other buildings. A
mixture of stucco, tile and decorative plaster relief siding materials will be utilized on ail the buildings
along with clay tile roofs. Arches, inset windows, awnings and wrought iron elements will serve to
formalize the buildings.
The buildings will incorporate a variety of offsets and pop-outs including several useable extedor
balconies. Moreover, varying rooflines will serve to break up the mass of each building and provide
interest. A three-story corner tower element with colored glass dome roof is proposed on Building B.
In addition, decorative columns and heavy beam wood trellis features will serve to identify and
formalize main building entrances. Three different stucco colors along with three accent colors will
be utilized on the three buildings to differentiate between stucco, trim and accent features.
Landscaping
Existing landscaping along the street frontage will be enhanced so as to define the project entry
drives and to fully screen onsite parking facilities. Perimeter landscaping will serve to buffer the
facility from adjacent uses. Landscaped courtyards and patios, both between and at the rear of
buildings, will create comfortable areas for employees to eat lunch. Rows of fruit trees and arbors
will be utilized adjacent to the circular ddve to create a formal entry area. Forty-eight inch box
specimen trees will be planted along front building elevations. Other trees will be planted at key
locations so as to break-up long building expanses. The applicant is proposing to utilize thirteen
different varieties of trees onsite including aleppo pines, sycamore, acacia, olive and assorted fruit
trees. In addition, twenty-one different varieties of shrubs will be utilized onsite including aralia,
photinia and oleander.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project conforms to all of the development regulations of the Business Park (BP) zoning district.
The building setbacks either meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the Development Code.
The .28 Floor Area Ratio is far below the target for this zoning district, which is .40. In addition, the
proposed 11% lot coverage is far below the maximum permitted 40%. Staff has determined that
196 onsite parking spaces are required for the office complex. A total of 218 spaces have been
provided.
Building Design
The proposed buildings are consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines and are
compatible with other adjacent buildings within the business park. Each building is unique while
conforming to the overall Mediterranean theme of the office complex. Numerous relief features,
insets, windows and varying roof lines serve to provide strong shadows and visual interest.
Landscaping
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and Design
Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen onsite parking areas and
soften building elevations. The landscaping improvements serve to tie the buildings together
creating a campus atmosphere.
RSD P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office C~nterXS taffRepor tandCOAs .doc
3
Access and Circulation
The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and has
determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the
previously approved City General Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and
determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site.
Environmental Determination
The project is larger than five acres in size and does not quality for an exemption from Califomia
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provisions. Therefore, an Initial Environmental Study was
prepared. The Study did not identify any potentially significant environmental impacts in association
with the proposed project. No additional mitigation measures are needed. Therefore, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Negative Declaration for the proposed project
in accordance with Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines. The public review pedod for the
Negative Declaration was from July 23, 2003 to August 12, 2003. At the time this report was
prepared, no wdtten comments had been received.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the professional office complex consisting of three buildings, as
conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan, Design Guidelines and Development Code.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Negative Declaration and Development Plan with the
attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other City ordinances.
The plan to develop a professional office complex totaling 58,625 square feet is consistent
with the Business Park (BP) zoning distdct and City-Wide Design Guidelines. Moreover, the
proposed plan, as conditioned, incorporates architectural and landscape designs, which will
achieve the City's General Plan Community Design Goal #3, "Preservation and
enhancement of the positive qualities of individual districts or neighborhoods ".
The professional office complex compiles with all applicable development standards of the
Development Code including off-street parking and landscaping requirements.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and City staff
pdor to occupancy will inspect all construction. The Fire Department staff has also found
that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for
emergency response to the site.
R:~,D PL2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center~ taffRepor~and COAs.doc
4
Attach merits
1. PC Resolution No. 2003-040 - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
2. Initial Study/Negative Declaration - Blue Page 21
3. Exhibits - Blue Page 22
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Building Elevations
G. Floor Plans
H. Landscaping Plan
R:~D P~2003\034)272 Ridge Park Office CenterXStafffieportandCOAs.doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-_~
R:~D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Ofl~ce Ccnter~StaffReportandCOAs.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA03-0272, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE THREE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 58,625 SQUARE FEET ON 5.6 ACRES.
THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
RIDGE PARK DRIVE, SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 940-310-028 &
032.
WHEREAS, Redhawk Communities, filed Planning Application No. PA03-0272,
Development Plan "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
August 20, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, ail legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. F ndin.qs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan, Specific Plan, and with
all applicable requirements of state law and other City ordinances.
The plan to develop a professional office complex totaling 58,625 square feet is consistent
with the Business Park (BP) zoning district and City-Wide Design Guidelines. Moreover, the
proposed plan, as conditioned, incorporates architectural and landscape designs, which will
achieve the City's General Plan Community Design Goal #3, "Preservation and
enhancement of the positive qualities of individual districts or neighborhoods ".
The professional office complex compiles with all applicable development standards of the
Development Code including off-street parking and landscaping requirements.
R:~D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center~StaffReportandCOAs.doc
7
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and City staff
prior to occupancy will inspect all construction. The Fire Department staff has also found
that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for
emergency response to the site.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was prepared in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, and indicated that the project would have no
significant effects on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been adopted.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a professional office complex consisting
of three buildings totaling 58,625 square feet set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be
deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 20~ day of August 2003.
ATTEST:
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the
th
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20 day of August 2003, by the following
vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~D PX2003\0343272 Ridge Park Office Center~taffReportandCOAs .doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center~StaffReportandCOAs,doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CiTY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.:
PA03-0272 Development Plan
Project Description:
A Development Plan to construct, establish and
operate a professional office complex
consisting of three buildings totaling 58,625
square feet on a 5.6-acre site.
Development Impact Fee Category: Office
Assessor's Parcel No.:
940-310-028 & 032
Approval Date:
August 20, 2003
Expiration Date:
August 20, 2005
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One-Thousand Three-
Hundred and Fourteen Dollars ($1,314.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the
City to file the Notice of Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Negative
Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of
Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour pedod the applicant/developer
has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for
the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code
Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the dght to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
R:~D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Cent~r~StaffRepor tandCOAs.doc
10
10.
All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevations), G (Floor Plans), H (Landscape Plan),
and the Color and Material Board contained on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. if it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with the Color and Material Board, contained on file with the Planning
Department.
a. Stucco Siding: Expo Plaster: #12 "Chenille", #225 "Sorrento", ~-460 "Pebble"
b. Accent Colors: ICl: #1485, "Noble Grey", #1026, "Blacksmith", #527 "Camel Tan"
c. Precast Columns: Match Quick Crete: "C3" Latte
d. Roofing: Redland Clay Tile: "Terra Cotta/Peach Flash" mix
e. Stone Tile: Calduro Natural Stone: "Calduro Cafb #2", "Calduro Naranja"
f. Awnings: Sunbrella Canvas Awnings: ~.4622 "Terra Cotta", ~.4667 "Mahogony",
~/-4608 "Jet Black"
g. Colored Concrete Paving: Solomon Concrete: #775 "Cedar", ~Y288 "Rosemary", #388
"Leather"
h. Aluminum Storefront Color: ICI: #201 "Sienna"
i. Glass: Clear Vision Glass
The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
P.:~D P~2003\034)272 Ridge Park Office C~n ter~StaiYRelmr~andCOAs,doe
11
11.
If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or
any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or
archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the
City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the
affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may
require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the
City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at
no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find.
Upon determining that the determination is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the
Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall
authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other
corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
12.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
13.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color pdnts of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the
colored version of approved Exhibit "F', the colored architectural elevations to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the
Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
14. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
15. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
16.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with
the Water Efficient Ordinance. The following items shall accompany the plans:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
17.
The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which
meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the
growth potential of the parking lot trees.
R:~D P~2003\03~0272 PJdge Park Office Center~StaflReportandCOAs.doc
12
18. A Certificate of Parcel Merger shall be approved and recorded for APN #'s 940-310-028 &
032.
Prior to Release of Power
19.
The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved bythe Planning Department
for a pedod of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
General Requirements
20.
A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
21.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
22.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
23.
The vehicular movement for Ridge Park Ddve at the center access to the site shall be for
entrance movement only.
24.
The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City
Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb and gutter,
sidewalks, drive approach,
b. Storm drain facilities
c. Sewer and domestic water systems
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
25.
26.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and pdvate property.
The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
27.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
R.:X,D P~2003~3-0272 PJdge Park Office Cent.¢r~Starfl~por tandCOAs.doc
13
28.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
29.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or pdvate
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
30.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
31.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
32.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
33.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
34.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
35.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
36.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design cdteda
shall be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
R:~D P~003\03~)272 Ridge park Office Ccntcr~StaffRcportandCOAs.doc
,14
37.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401and 402.
e. All street and ddveway centedine intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Ridge Park Ddve (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' PJW) to
include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, and utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer).
38.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
39.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
40.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
41.
The Developer shall record a wdtten offer to participate in, and waive all dghts to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bddge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee Distdct for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass
Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
42.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
43.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
wdtten clearance from the following agencies:
' a. Rancho Califomia Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
R:~D P~2003\03~)272 Ridge Park Office Center~S~a~r~ndCOAs.doc
15
44.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
45.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shallbe repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
46.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans ara reviewed by
the Fira Pravention Buraau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which ara in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
47.
The Fire Pravention Bureau is raquired to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public straets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fira hydrants may be raquired.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
48.
The Fire Pravention Buraau is raquirad to set minimum fira hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads
and adjacent to public straets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each
intersection and shall be located no mora than 250 feet from any point on the straet or Fira
Department access read(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fira flow shall be available
from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fira hydrants may be
raquirad. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B).
49.
As raquirad by the Califomia Fira Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public straet, as measurad by an approved reute around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fira hydrants and mains capable of supplying the requirad fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
50.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection pdor
to any building construction, (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
51.
Prior to building construction, all locations whera structuras ara to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
52.
Prior to building final, all locations whera structuras are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (
CFC sec 902)
R:~D P~2003\03~)272 Ridge Park Office Center~Sta flRcportandCOAs.doc
16
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a tumaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
Pdor to issuance of building permits, the developer shall fumish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval pdor to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency pdor to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Pdor to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the proper[y. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
Pdor to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval pdor to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC ,Article 10)
Pdor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the dght side of the fire sprinkler dser room door. (CFC 902.4)
R:~D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, S taflRepor tandCOAs.doc
63.
64.
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
65. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
66.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Conditions
67.
All parkways including areas within the ROW, fencing, on site lighting and landscaping shall
be maintained by the property owner or an established maintenance association.
68.
The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure
areas.
69.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
Prior to ssuance of Buildin.q Permits
70.
The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
71.
Prior to issuance of building permits orthe installation of street lighting on Ridge Park Ddve,
which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit
the approved Edison streetlight improvement plans and pay the appropriate energy fees
related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD maintenance program.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
72.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
R:~D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center~StaffRcpor~andCOAs,doc
18
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TU MF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on
March 31,2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee
schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation, of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Depadment of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
Provide house electrical meter provisions for ~ower for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be ~n accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
Provide electrical plan including Icad calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
Steel truss, steel joist calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
R:~D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge park Office Center, S ~a ft~epor tandCOA s .doc
19
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
88.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the attached Rancho
California Water District letter dated May 20, 2003.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:~D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center~Staffil. eportandCOAs.doc
20
May 20, 2003
Matt Harris, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL NO. 1 OF PARCEL MAP 19626-2 AND
A PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 22 OF PARCEL MAP 12549
APN 940-310-028 AND APN 940-310-032
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0272
Dear Mr. Harris:
Please be advised that the property is__lo_cated within_the _
boundaries, of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium site with
individual building owners and a homeowners' association maintaining the
common property and private water and fire protection facilities. As a condition
of the project, RCWD requires that the City of Temecula include a Reciprocal
Easement and Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water facilities.
In addition to tkds agreement, RCWD will require individual water meters for
each building if a condominium conversion takes.place.
If you should have. any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
03~SB:at 130~F012-T6~FCF
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Bud Jones, Senior Engineering Technician
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
INITIAL STUDY ! NEGATIVE DECLARATION
R?d) P~2003\03 -0272 Ridge park Office CenterXStaffReportandCOAs.doc
21
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration
PROJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Planning Application No. 03-0272 Development Plan for Ridge Park Office Center
Robert Reynolds, Redhawk Communities
East side of Ridge Park Drive, south of Rancho California Road (APN # 940-310-
O28 & O32).
To construct, establish and operate three professional office buildings totaling
56,000 square feet on a previously graded and prepared site.
The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based
upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project
as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the
Planning Commission intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for this project.
The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are
included in the project design.
The Comment Pedod for this proposed Negative Declaration is July 23, 2003 to August 12, 2003. Written
corements and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the
following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033. City Hall is located at
43200 Business Park Drive.
The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through:
The Local Newspaper. ~ Posting the Site. _ Notice to Adjacent Property Owners.
If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact (Name
and Title) at (909) 694-6400.
Prepared by: ~ ~-.~/-~' Matthew Harris, Associate Planner .
(Signat[~;e) ' (Name and Title)
R:~D 1~2003~03-0272 Ridge Park Office Ceater~otice of Intent,doc
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Agency Distribution
PROJECT: Planning Application No. PA03-0272 Development Plan for Ridge Park Office Center
DISTRIBUTION DATE: July 18, 2003 CASE PLANNER: Matt Harris
CITY OF TEMECULA:
Building & Safety ..................................... (X)
Fire Department ...................................... (X)
Police Department ................................ ( X )
Parks & Recreation (TCSD) .................... (X)
Planning, Advance .................................. ( )
Public Works ........................................... (X)
STATE:
Caltrans .................................................... ( )
Fish & Game ............................................ ( )
Mines & Geology ..................................... ( )
Regional Water Quality Control Bd .......... ( )
State Clearinghouse ................................ ( )
State Clearinghouse (15 Copies) ............. ( )
Water Resources .................................... ( )
...... ()
FEDERAL:
Army Corps of Engineers ......................... ( )
Fish and Wildlife Service .......................... ( )
........ ()
REGIONAL:
Air Quality Management District .............. (X)
Western Riverside COG ......................... ( )
...... ()
CITY OF MURRIETA:
Planning ............................. ; .................... ( )
...... ()
RIVERSIDE COUNTY:
Clerk and Recorder's Office .................... (X)
R:~D 1K20~3\03 -(D.'12 Ridge Park Office Center,Not/ce of Int~t. doc
Airport Land Use Commission ................. ( )
Engineer .................................................. ( )
Flood Control ......................................... (X)
Health Department ................................. (X)
Parks and Recreation .............................. ( )
Planning Department ............................... ( )
Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) ... ( )
Riverside Transit Agency ........................ (X)
....... ( )
UTILITY:
Eastem Municipal Water Distdct .............
Inland Valley Cablevision ........................
Rancho CA Water District, Will Serve .... (X)
Southern California Gas ......................... (X)
Southem Califomia Edison ..................... (X)
Temecula Valley School Distdct ............. (X)
Metropolitan Water District ..................... (X)
OTHER:
Pechanga Indian Reservation ................. (X)
Eastern Information Center .................... (X)
Local Agency Formation Comm .............. ( )
RCTC ...................................................... ( )
Homeowners' Association .......................... ( )
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
~ Environmental Checklist
Project Title Planning Application No. 03-0272 (Development Plan) - Ridge Park
Office Center
Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Contact Person and Phone Number Matt Harris, Associate Planner
(909) 694-6400
Project Location East side of Ridge Park Drive, south of Rancho California Road
Project Sponsor's Name and Address Robert Reynolds, Redhawk Communities Inc.
43529 Ridge Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
General Plan Designation Business Park (BP)
Zoning Business Park (BP)
Description of Project To construct, establish and operate three office buildings totaling
56,000 square feet.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The project is located in the BP (Business Park) zone. Surrounding
land uses include office/vacant to the west, vacant to the south,
office to the north and industrial to the east. Street improvements,
water and sewer are constructed within the vicinity of the project.
Other public agencies whose approval Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside County Health
is required Department, Eastern Municipal Water District, Rancho California
Water District, Southern California Gas Company, Southern
California Edison Company, Verizon Telephone Company, and
~ Riverside Transit Agency
Location Map
R:~D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, Initial Study.doc
1
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Mineral Resources
Agricultural Resources Population and Housing Noise
Air Quality Population and Housing
Biological Resources, Water Public Services
Cultural Resources Recreation
Geologic Problems Transportation/Traffic
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems
Hydrology and Water Quality
Land Use Planning X None
Determination
(To be completed by the lead agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant impact on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to b~I
the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially
significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Signature
Date
Matt Harris, Associate Planner
Printed name
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center,Initial Study.doc
2
1. AESTHETICS. WouLd the project:
' · : ~ · : : ' ' ' , Signi ~an ! '- Miti{~ ioh ;
ssuesandSupportng, normat~onSources ; ..... , Impact :~. ,; Incorporated,, , top,ct<
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not X
limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building
within a state scenic highway?
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which X
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Comments:
,8·
No Impact. The project will not affect a scenic vista· The project is not located in an area where there
is a scenic vista. It is located in an area with existing office/industrial uses· No impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
No Impact. Ridge Park Drive is not designated as a scenic resource nor is the site within view of a
State Scenic Highway. As a consequence, no significant impact to scenic resources will result from
the proposed project or the future development of the site.
No Impact. The project site consists of a graded building pad within an existing business park. The
site has not been designated as a scenic resource. The City's Development Code requires that
landscaping be incorporated into the project design which will serve to enhance the visual character of
the site. Therefore, the project will not have a significant adverse impact.
1 .d. Less Than SignificanL The project will produce and result in light/glare, as all development of this
nature results in new light sources. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar
Observatory. The project will be conditioned to be consistent with City Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance
Regulating Light Pollution). With this mitigation measure in place, less than significant impacts are
anticipated.
2. Agricultural Resources. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional
model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
, ~ * Sg~h~nt ~lmpacb ~
a. Conve~ Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X
of Statewide Impodance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
~__ ~ricultural use?
b. Conflict with the existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X
Williamson Act contract?
c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Perk Office Center\Initial Study.doc
3
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
of farmland, to non-agricultural use?
Comments:
2a.-c. No Impact. The project site is not currently in agricultural production and in the historic past has not
been used for agricultural purposes. The site is not under a Williamson Act contract nor is it zoned for
agricultural uses. This property is not considered prime or unique farmland of statewide or local
importance as identified by the State Department of Conservation and the City of Temecula General
Plan. In addition, the project will not involve changes in the existing environment which would result in
the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. Therefore, there is no significant impact related to
this issue.
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
ii ; signi ic~nt w th . Less'Th~n
In~0~pSra{ed Ir~a,c~ - !mpa'ci
,, ,, ,:::,:;- Issues,and~S~pport~nglnformatlonSources:,-,,~ ,:, -
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X
air quality plan?
b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- ·
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors?
d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X
concentrations?
e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X
of people?
~ Comments:
· 3.a, b. Less Than Significant Impact. The project as proposed will comply with State and National ambient
air quality standards. The air quality impacts associated with the proposed land use were previously
evaluated in association with the adoption of the City's General Plan and Draft Environmental Impact
Report. No significant impacts related to conflicts with air quality plans will result from the proposed
project.
.0.
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in item 3. a,b above, the project falls below acceptable
standards as established by thresholds for impacts associated with construction of a professional
office development. The total square footage of the office development is 56,000 square feet. As a
consequence, a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project.
No Impact. The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no significant
pollutants in proximity to the project nor is it anticipated that the project will generate pollutants. ']
project shall comply with the environmental standards as detailed in the Development Code
professional office development. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\D P~003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, Initial Study.doc
4
Less Than Significant Impact. The project may create objectionable odors during the construction
phase of the project. These impacts will be of short duration and are not considered significant over
the long term. The project shall comply with the environmental standards as detailed in the
Development Code for office development. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the
project.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
'" ' :lsSue~ a~d S~ppO~dg !nformatib~ SoUrc~s~ ~ :: ~ ,' impact,, ~ , Iqco~rat~
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Depa~ment of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Se~ice?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Depa~ment of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Se~ice?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected X
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
~ coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d. Intedere substantially with the movement of any native X
resident or migratow fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratow wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nurseW sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X
biological resources, such as a tree presewation policy or
ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat
Conse~ation Plan, Natural Communi~ Conse~ation X
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conse~ation plan?
Comments:
,'. 4.a-e
No Impact. The General Plan does not designate the project site as a potentially sensitive habitat site.
The site is outside the habitat area identified for the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly and does not contain
wetlands as defined by the Clean Water Act. The site has been rough graded previously into
developable office/industrial pads. There is no anticipated biological impact associated with this
project.
Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project is located within the fee
area for the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat (SKR) Long-Term Habitat Conservation Plan. All development
within this fee area is required to pay a mitigation fee. This project will be required to pay a mitigation
fee for the SKR. As a consequence, with mitigation measures incorporated into the Conditions of
Approval for this project, a less than significant impact is anticipated.
R:\O P~003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, Initial Study.doc
5
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
sSues andSuPp0rting InfOrmation Sources. ~ ~r"pact ~nc~rporated ~mpact !~
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X
a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.57
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.57
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred X
outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments:
5.a-d. No Impact. The City of Temecula General Plan identifies the project site as an area of sensitivity for
amheological resources. Moreover, the General Plan indicates that the site has a high sensitivity for
Paleoontological resources. Construction of the office buildings will occur on land that has been
graded into building pads. Due to previous land disturbance, it is unlikely that cultural resources
remain on this site. In addition, the Eastern Information Center, Department of Anthropology at the
University of California Riverside has indicated that a Phase I Cultural Resource Study (MF # 1496 RI-
1426) was conducted as part of a larger project and identified no cultural resources within the
boundaries of the project area. Therefore, no impacts to cultural resources are anticipated and no
mitigation measures are recommended.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? ·
,~ ,~ .... .- ' · ~,,5'~ ~ ~ ~ Potent,ally Si~[~ifiC~l~t~[th ~ ~ffs, s~Ti~a~!~;~ ~ i~;
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adveme effects, including the risk of loss, inju~, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known eaAhquake fault, as delineated on X
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Ea~hquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X
iv) Landslides? X
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B X
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or prope~?
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center~nitial Study,doc
6
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? (cont.)
NO~
e. Have soil incapable of adequately suppoding the use of X
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste
water?
Comments:
6.a.i, ii, No Impact. Both the City's General Plan and General Plan Environmental Report do not identify the
project site as being located within a known fault zone.
iv;b., and d.
Less Than Significant Impact. There may be a potentially significant impact from Seismic-related
ground failure because the project site is located within a subsidence zone. The project is located in
Southern California, an area that is seismically active. Any potential significant impacts will be
mitigated through building construction, consistent with the Uniform Building Code standards. Further,
the project will be conditioned to provide soil reports prior to grading and recommendations contained
in these reports are complied with during construction. The soil reports will also contain
recommendations for the compaction of the soil, which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant
impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction, subsidence and expansive
soils. After mitigation measures are performed, a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result
of this project.
Less Than Significant Impact. The development of the site may be affected by subsidence or
unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill, due to its location within a subsidence zone.
Potential impacts shall be mitigated by compliance with State of California Alquist-Priolo Special
Studies Zone development criteria and construction in accordance with Uniform Building Code
standards. A soils report shall be required as part of the development and shall contain
recommendations for the compaction of the soil which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant
impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure (including subsidence), erosion, changes
in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill and expansive soils. Erosion
control techniques will be included as a condition of approval for development projects at the site.
Potential unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill will be mitigated through the. use of
proper compaction of the soils and landscaping. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a
result of this project.
No Impact. Septic sewage disposal systems are not proposed for this project. The project is
connected to the existing public sewer system in Ridge Park Drive; therefore, no impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\Q P~003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, Initial Study.dec
7
7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.' Would the project:
~ - ~ Less Thah-'--- ~ ~
~ ~: ' <~' ~ , Potent[alJy SigniiiCant With Less Than
~ ~ i~ si~[~ific~nt ~{i~[!i~ Signifi~nt
- i~u~ and SUpposing Information Sources ~mpac~ Incorporated impa~ Impa~
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X
environment through the routine transpo~ation, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely X
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
qua~er mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of X
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e. For a project located within an airpo~ land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within ~o
miles or a public airpo~ or public use airpo~, would the
project result in a safe~ hazard for people residing or
workin ~ the rdect area? J
f. For a project within the vicini~ of a private airstrip, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g. Impair implementation of or physically intedere with an X
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, X
inju~ or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wiJdlands?
Comments:
~ 7,a.,b. No Impact. The project consists of the development of three professional office buildings. No
~ hazardous materials will be utilized onsite in association with the proposed use.
7.c. No Impact. The project site is not located within lA mile of an existing or proposed school, No impact
is anticipated.
No Impact. This project site is not nor is it located near a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 that would create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
7.e.,f. No Impact. The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles
public or private airstrip. No impact upon airport uses will result from this proposal.
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, Initial Study.doc
8
No Impact. The project will take access from maintained public streets and will therefore not impede
emergency response or evacuation plans. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
'.h. No Impact. The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with flammable brush,
grass, or trees. The project is professional office buildings in an area of similar Business Park/Light
Industrial uses. The project is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. No impacts are
anticipated.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
' ~:~ . ' '~ '~ ', ' · BO~tiaily- Si~nifica~tlWith .Le?s~han2: ~ 'r/~ ~ ' `%`
· . . ~lssuesaedSuppo~mg:!nformat~onSources :,? .' .. ~ '~ '~,~.'.~
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X
requirements?
b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intedere X
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate
of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not suppo~ existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage paEern of the site X
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
~. Substantially alter the existing drainage pa~ern of the site X
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the (ate or
amount of sudace runoff in a manner that would result in
flooding on- or off-site?
e. Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the X
, capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f. Othe~ise substantially degrade water quality? X
g. Place housing within a lO0-year flood hazard area as X
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Bounda~ or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h. Place within a lO0-year flood hazard area structures X
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X
inju~ or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X
Comments:
.8,
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements. The project is required to comply with the requirements of the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control
Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is
R:\D P~003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, Initial Study.doc
9
8.b.f.
8.c.d.
shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be
mitigated to a level less than significant. With mitigation, a less than significant impact is anticipated
as a result of this project.
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not substantially deplete groundwater suppliesl
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aqui'er
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. The project will not have an affect on the
quantity and quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability. Further, construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact
on ground waters or aquifer volume. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation and/or
flooding on- o~: off-site. Some changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount
of surface runoff is expected whenever development occurs on previously permeable ground.
Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying
hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, potential impacts
shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances are required for the project to safely
and adequately handle runoff that is created. As designed, the proposed project would have a less
than significant impact on the existing facilities.
8.e. Less Than Significant Impact. The project is not anticipated to create or contribute runoff water,
which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide
substantial additional soumes of polluted runoff. The project is conditioned to accommodate the
drainage created as a result of the development of the subject site. In addition, the project is
conditioned so that the drainage will not impact surrounding properties. A less than significant impact
is associated with this project.
e.g.
8.h.,i.
8,j.
No Impact. This project represents a development plan for a professional office user within an
zoned for office/light industrial uses. No residential property is affected; no impact is associated with
this project.
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not expose people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding. According to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District, the project site is not in area that is subject to severe flood hazard from Murrieta Creek.
Further, the site is not located within the limits of a lO0-year floodplain/floodway as delineated on
Panel No. 060742 O010B of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in conjunction with the National
Flood Insurance Program administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The
project is located within the dam inundation area identified in the City of Temecula General Plan Final
Environmental Impact Report. Utilizing existing emergency response systems can mitigate impacts.
This project, as conditioned, requires the developer to pay flood mitigation fees to the Riverside
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. A less than significant impact is anticipated as
a result of this project because mitigation measures are in place for the site and general area of the
site.
No Impact. The project site is not subject to inundation by sieche, tsunami, or mudflow as these
events are not known to happen in this region. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Cente~nitial Study.doc
10
9. Land Use and Planning. Would the project:
· ~. , ~' .,~ 'P~ot~tially ~ig~ifi~tWith ~ · ~
~.. , . . ~ ~: SignifiCant Uitig~t~P .~ ~-S~gn~flcapt~
: ' '~ ~,~'~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~' ,~-~-~ ~ '~" .... ~l~pa~ i~6mted ~ ~l~'~~ ~'lmpa~
' . ;~lssaes~ao~ SuppoAmgCnformat~on Sou[ces~g/h:~~; ~ ~ ~-- g ~ ·:
a. Physically divide an established community? X
b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or X
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an
environmental effect?
c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conse~ation plan or X
natural communi~ conse~ation plan?
Comments:
No Impact. The project is a proposal to establish three professional office buildings. There is no
established residential community on the site nor in the vicinity. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
No Impact. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use Designation of BP
(Business Park) and the zoning designation of BP (Business Park), which call for the development of
well designed business and employment centers. The proposed development plan meets the intent of
these designations. Impacts from all General Plan Land Use Designations were analyzed in the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City
commented on the scope of the analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact
their particular agency. These agencies were given the opportunity to comment on the project and
their comments are made a part of the Conditions of Approval for the project. The project site has
been previously graded and services have been extended to the area. As a result, the project is not
anticipated to conflict with existing land uses.
,0,
Less Than Significant Impact. The project is located within the fee area for the Stephen's Kangaroo
Rat (SKR) Long-Term Habitat Conservation Plan. All development within this fee area is required to
pay a mitigation fee. This project will be required to pay a mitigation fee for the SKR. With this
measure in place, the project is anticipated to have less than significant impacts.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availabili~ of a Iocally-impo~ant X
mineral resource recovew site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, InitiAl Study.doc
11
10.a.b. No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of available, known mineral resources or in the loss
of an available, locally important mineral resource recovery site. The State Geologist has classified
the City of Temecula a classification of MRZ-3a, containing areas of sedimentary deposits, which have
the potential for supplying sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However,~
has been determined that this area contains no deposits of significant economic value based uw
available data in a report entitled Mineral Land Classification of the Temescal Valley Area, Riversi(]'E
County, California1 Special Report 165, prepared in accordance with the Surface Mining and
Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
11. NOISE. Would the project result in:
~ ' Less Than , -
· Pgte~tially Sigr~ific~nt With ~l~e's~ Th~n :..
~, Significant - Mitigation Si~i~icent ' N~0
"; ,::~l~sUeS and'Supp0rting Inform~tio~ .$~'rces impact Indorporated . Impact I~hl~act
a. Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of X
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels X
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient X
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two ~
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
Comments:
11 .a. Less Than Significant Impact. The project may expose people to severe noise levels during the
development/construction phase (short term). Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in
the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet, which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage
from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of noise will be of short duration and not long-term.
Construction hours are regulated by the City Development Code, to which the applicant shall comply.
Therefore noise as a result of construction will not be considered significant.
11 .b.,c. Less Than Significant Impact. The uses conducted by the project are not activities that would
expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels· While
professional office development will create noise levels greater than the currently vacant land, long-
term noise generated by this project would be within the limits of the General Plan and Development
Code standards· No impacts are anticipated.
11.d.
Less Than Significant Impact. The project may result in temporary or periodic increases in ambient
noise levels during construction. As mentioned in response 11 .a. construction machinery is capabl~
producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet, which is considered annoying. However,
source of noise from construction of the project will be of short duration and therefore would not be
considered significant. Furthermore, construction activity will comply with City ordinances regulating
the hours of activity. A less than significant impact is anticipated.
R:\D P~003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center,Initial Study.doc
12
11.e.f. No Impact. This project is not within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, therefore,
employees working in the project area will not be exposed to excessive noise levels generated by an
~1 airport. (Jonsequemly, no tmpacT is anTicipaTe(3 as a result Ol [rlls
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a. Induce substantial population gro~h in an area, either X
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through e~ension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X
necessitating the construction of replaoement housing
elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Comments:
12.a.
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either
directly or indirectly. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of BP
(Business Park) and Zoning Designation of BP (Business Park). The proposed office development
could cause some people to relocate to, or within the Temecula area. However, it will not induce
substantial growth beyond what is projected in the City's General Plan.
12.b.c. No Impact. The project will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, as the site
is a vacant graded building pad within the Business Park (BP) zone. Additionally, the project site is
located within an existing business park area, which does not permit residential development. The
project will neither displace housing nor people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing.
No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered Government services in any of the following areas:
,... ~ :,~ ~ .~ ~Potentlally~,,~ ,~Sgnfcan W h:~. L~Thah ~
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical X
impacts associates with the provisions of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable se~ice ratios, response
times or other pedormance objectives for any of the
public se~ices?
b. Fire protection? X
~ Police protection? X
Schools? X
e. Parks? X
f. Other public facilities? X
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, Initial Study.doc
13
Comments:
13.a.,b.,c.,e.
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, nor resul{
a need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The project will incrementa
increase the need for some services. However, the project will contribute its fair share through City
Development Impact Fees to the maintenance or provision of services from these entities. Less than
significant impacts are anticipated.
13.d.
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, nor result in
a need for new or altered school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to
relocate within or to the City. The cumulative effect from the project will be mitigated through the
payment of applicable School Fees. Less than significant impacts are anticipated.
13.f.
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, nor result in
a need for new or altered public facilities. The Rancho California Water District and the Riverside
Department of Environmental Health have been made aware of this project. A condition of approval
has been placed on this project that will require the proponent to obtain "Will Serve" letters from all of
the public utilities agencies. Service is currently provided to the project site and will result in less than
significant impacts.
14. RECREATION. Would the project:
- .. : ¢ ,~.~ ~ c : ,, , ,- pot,enti~[!y significant With : Less,Than ~ ~ ~
a. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facili~ would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require X
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities,
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Comments:
14.a.b. No Impact. The project consists of three professional office buildings and is relatively small in scale.
The anticipated need to increase the neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities as
a result of this project is unlikely. The project may cause some employees to relocate from existing
facilities elsewhere in Southern California to the City of Temecula and it is worth noting that the
applicant shall be required to pay Development Impact Fees, which contribute towards the provision of
recreational facilities in the City. With the design of the project and the mitigation measures in place,,
impacts are anticipated to be less than significant as a result of this project.
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center\Initial Study.doc
14
15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
~ ' ' ~ ' ~S!~i~i?n ' ~g~gh~ ; %Sig~i~n~ '
~4~ :~ $:~l~su~a~dSuppoAinglnfo~matlon~Sources;~:~ /~ ~,~:~ ~ ~ s ~:~i~ ~ ~,
a. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in X
relation to the existing traffic load and capaci~ of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity
ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections?
b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of X
se~ice standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either X
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature X
(e.g., sharp cu~es or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X
f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? X
g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs X
suppoding alternative transpo~ation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
mments:
15.a,b. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not anticipated to cause significant impacts
to the existing traffic system within the City. The project at hand is three professional office buildings
totaling 56,000 square feet which is consistent with the zoning and general plan designations. During
the preparation of the General Plan and the General Plan EIR the impacts associated with this type of
development were considered. Additionally, the City's Traffic Engineer reviewed the cumulative
impacts during the approval process and has determined that the project's traffic impacts warrant no
further study or mitigations.
15.c.d. No Impact. The proposed development of this property will not result in a change in air traffic patterns
by increasing the traffic levels in the vicinity. The site is not within the French Valley Airport's flight
overlay district. The design of the project will not pose a threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the
people utilizing the roads in the vicinity of the project. One onsite driveway is located at a curve along
Ridge Park Drive. However, the project has been designed to limit vehicular movement at the driveway
to "entry only~'. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
15.e.
15.f.
No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses.
The project is a professional office complex in an area developed with office/industrial uses. The
project, as designed, complies with current City standards and has adequate emergency access. No
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No Impact. The proposed development complies with the City's Development Code parking
requirements for office uses. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Perk Office Center, Initial Study.doc
15
15.g. No Impact. The project site is located on a road that has access tO public transportation. The project
as proposed does not conflict with adopted policies, plans,, or programs supporting alternative
transportation.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project:
' '. ' : ' Less Than .
. ~' /' ' ':~ ' ?'~tentially Sign c~nWth LessThan
; ' ~ . , Significant Mi!igation sign~ifiC~t Nb
· issues and Supportihg Informa~tio~ SOurces Impact Incorporated impaq! Imp¢ct
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b. Require or result in the construction of new water or X
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the X
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
. d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X
regulations related to solid waste?
Comments:
16.a.,b., e.
Less Than SigmTicant Impact. The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements,
require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The
project wiil have an incremental effect upon existing systems. However, the Final Environmental
Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan
would not significantly impact wastewater services." Since the project is consistent with the City's
General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
16.c.
No Impact. The project site is located within an existing business park which has existing storm water
drainage facilities. The type and capacity of the existing facilities were constructed to adequately serve
the developments on the various building pads within the business park. Consequently construction of
new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities is not anticipated.
16.d.
Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor
require expanded water entitlements. The project will have an incremental effect upon
systems. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD have
indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR
i R:\D P~003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center\Initial Study.doc
16
further states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact
wastewater services (p. 40)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
g. Less Than Significant ImpacL The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any
potential impacts from solid waster created by this development can be mitigated through participation
in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
i a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quali~ X
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate impo~ant examples of the major periods of
California histoW or prehistow?
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively X
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
~ the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects?
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will X
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
17.a.
No ImpacL The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment on site
or in the vicinity of the project. The site lies within an existing business park and has been planned to
accommodate professional office development. The project will not substantially reduce the habitat of
fish or wildlife because the site has already been rough graded. Moreover, no historic resources are
anticipated to be impacted because grading has already occurred on the site.
17.b.
Less Than Significant ImpacL Cumulative impact analysis was conducted for the project with
regards to drainage, traffic, air quality, noise and service systems. In all aspects, the proposed
development is consistent with the General Plan designation for the property, and as such, impacts
generated by the proposed development are no greater than what is anticipated at buildout of the City.
17.o.
Less Than Significant Impact. The project was analyzed with regards to noise, hazards and
geologic events. In all aspects, the project has been designed or conditioned to reduce impacts to a
less than significant level.
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, Initial Study.doc
17
18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR,
or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or
negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the followino,~
on attached sheets.
a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope
of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and
the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
18.a.
18.b.
18.c.
The City's General Plan and Final Environment Impact Report were used as a referenced soume in
preparing this Initial Study. The Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the City's General
Plan in July, 1993. The proposed determination of this study was that the project did not have a
significant effect on the environment, prompting the preparation of a Negative Declaration.
There were no earlier impacts, which affected this project.
As conditioned, this project is anticipated to impose less than significant impacts on the environment.
As a result no mitigation measures have been incorporated as a part of this initial environmental study.
SOURCES
City of Temecula General Plan.
City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
The City of Temecula Development Code.
R:\D P~003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center, Initial Study.doc
18
ATFACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:~D I~2003\03-0272 Ridge P~rk Office Center~StaffReportandCOAs.doc
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
VICINITY MAP
R:~D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center~StaffReportandCOAs.doc
23
ClTY OFTEMECULA
EXHIBIT B
DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial)
ZONING MAP
EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 (Development Plan)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
GENERAL PLAN
R:\D P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park O~ice Ceate~S taf fi~ep Ol~tadCO As.dec
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
SITE PLAN
R:~D P~.003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center~StaflReportaadCOAs.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
GRADING PLAr~
R:X,D P~2003\034)272 Ridge Park Office Center~StaffReportandCOAs.doe
ClTY OFTEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
R?d) 1~2003\03 ~)272 Ridge Park Office Center~StaffReportandCOAs.doc
CiTY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 (Dovolopmont Plan)
£XHIRIT Gl FLOOR PLANl
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20,
RSD P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Center~StafffieportaadCOAs.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
rE~The Garret[ Gr°up, LLC--.--"--~'
RIDGE PARK OFFICE CENTER
BNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0138 (Development Plan)
IT H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
LANDSCAPING
R?ff) P~2003\03-0272 Ridge Park Office Cea~etSStaffReportandCOAs.doc
ITEM #4
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August20,2003
PA02-0512 (Tentative Parcel Map)
Planning Application Nos. PA03-0233 (Development Plan)
PA03-0234 (Conditional Use PermitJDevelopment Plan)
Prepared By: Thomas Thornsley, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No's. PA02-0512, PA03-0233, and
PA03-0234 based on the Determination of Consistency with a project (PA01-0522) for which
a Negative Declaration was previously adopted pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
- Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations.
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA02-0512 FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30797, A
REQUEST TO DIVIDE 14.48 ACRES INTO 8 PARCELS WITH A
MINIMUM GROSS LOT SIZE OF 43,677 SQUARE FEET,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, EAST
OF AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, AND THE FUTURE RANCHO
PUEBLO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO'S. 959-
070-001 THRU 003.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA03-0233 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF AN 11.02 ACRE MIXED-USE
PROFESSIONAL CENTER WHICH INCLUDES FIVE OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 97,506 SQUARE FEET, AND TWO
RESTAURANT/RETAIL BUILDINGS, TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE
FEET, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH,
EAST OF AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, AND THE FUTURE RANCHO
PUEBLO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO'S. 959-
070-001 THRU 003.
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA03-0234 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR THE OPERATION, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF
A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY CONSISTING OF A 1-STORY 1,307
SQUARE FOOT OFFICE, THREE 1-STORY STORAGE BUILDINGS
AND TWO 2-STORY STORAGE BUILDINGS FOR A COMBINED
TOTAL OF 108,844 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, EAST OF AVENIDA DE
MlSSlONES, AND THE FUTURE RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO'S. 959-070-001 AND 002.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANTS:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
Mel Malkoff, Malkoff & Associates, 18456 Lincoln Circle, Villa
Park, CA 29861 (PA03-0233)
Ingrid Campbell, WLC Architects, 187 Avenida La Pata, San
Clemente, CA 92673 (PA03-0234)
Stan Heaton, Temecula Engineering Consultants, 29377
Rancho California Rd., Temecula, CA 92591 (PA02-0512)
PA02-0512: A Tentative Parcel Map request to divide 14.48
acres into 8 parcels.
PA03-0233: A Development Plan for a mixed-use
professional center consisting of 5 office buildings totaling
97,506 square feet and 2 restaurant/retail buildings, totaling
12,000 square feet.
PA03-0234: A Conditional Use Permit for a self-storage
facility consisting of a 1 -story 1,307 square foot office, three
1-story storage buildings and two 2-story storage buildings for
a combined total of 108,844 square feet.
On the north side of Highway 79 South, east of Avenida de
Missiones, and the future Rancho Pueblo Road, known as
Assessor Parcel Nos. 959-070-001 thru 003.
PO (Professional Office)
PDO-6 (Planned Development Overlay-6)
North:
South:
East:
West:
VL (Very Low Density Residential)
LM (Medium Low Density Residential)
PO (Professional Office)
PDO-6 (Planned Development Overlay-6)
R:\D P~003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center\Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
2
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Vacant
North: Single family homes
South: Single family homes
East: Vacant land
West: Vacant land (Approved: Rancho Community Church)
PROJECT STATISTICS
Bu dinq Areas
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 3
Lot 4
Lot 5
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 8
Total Area:
Mini-storage
Office (Pad A)
Restaurant (Pad B)
Office (Pad C)
Office (Pad D)
Office (Pad E)
Office (Pad F)
Restaurant (Pad G)
Building Size Lot Size (Gross Acres)
108,844 square feet 3.92
13,046 square feet 1.00
6,000 square feet 1.09
21,960 square feet 2.49
20,270 square feet 1.23
20,270 square feet 1.18
21,960 square feet 2.30
6,000 square feet 1.27
217,378 square feet 14.48
Overall Site Coverage:
Building Area:
Paving:
Hardscape:
Landscape Area:
Floor Area Ratio:
136,336 square feet 25%
253,022 square feet 47%
42,738 square feet 8%
112,498 square feet 20%
.40 FAR
BACKGROUND
In September 2002, the City Council approved Planned Development Overlay-6 (PDO-6), which
established the development standards for 53 acres on the north side of SR-79 South. Rancho
Community Church and a private school was approved for development of the westerly 39 acres. On
April 25, 2003, the owner of the remaining easterly 14 acres submitted these development
proposals. Although there are three different applications (parcel map, professional center, and
storage facility), they are all being reviewed as one comprehensive development proposal with
separate conditions.
A Development Review Committee meeting was held on June 4, 2003. At that time extensive site
design and architectural changes were requested due to inconsistencies with the design guidelines
adopted for the PDO. A follow up meeting was held July 17, 2003 as staff worked with the applicant
to integrate final design elements into the revised plans. Plans were resubmitted on July 24, 2003,
and staff cleared the projects for hearing on August 1,2003.
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
3
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Tentative Parcel Map
Tentative Parcel Map No. 30797 requests to subdivide 14.48 acres into 8 parcels. The configuration
of lots is to provide individual lot ownership of each development pad for Rancho Pueblo
Professional Center and the Temecula Super Storage facility.
The area to be subdivided is located on the north side of State Highway 79 South beginning at the
cross street of Avenida de Misssiones and continuing east for 1040 feet east. The approval of the
map will create an internal street off of State Highway 79 South referred to as Rancho Pueblo Road.
Development Plan
The applicant is requesting approval for the development of a 14.48-acre site with a design that
includes eight developable pad sites for five offices, two restaurants, and a self-storage facility.
These projects are proposed for development in three phases over a period of one to three years.
Phase I The internal road system, mass grading of the entire site, construction of the self-
storage facility and the office on Pad A with it's associated parking, and the
streetscape landscaping and erosion control landscaping.
Phase II The four clustered office buildings (Pads C-F) with their common plaza and the
associated parking.
The two restaurant pads (B & G) and the associated parking.
Phase III
Access/Circulation
The design of this project creates a roadway (Rancho Pueblo Road) from SR-79 South, north along
the west property line for a distance of 400 feet, then east through the site terminating at the eastern
end of the project where the road is intended to continue with future development proposals. At the
eastern termination of Rancho Pueblo along the property line is a north/south street (Street A) that
connects to SR-79 South.
The internal mad system divides the property into two rectangular development areas. Access to
the southern area, adjacent to SR-79 South, is provided from four locations; two from the north side
off of Rancho Pueblo and one each from the streets on the east and west sides of the site. Internal
cimulation allows both vehicular and pedestrian traffic to access all facilities without the need to exit
the site. At three locations around the cluster of office buildings are "drop-off" zones in anticipation
that this complex will include medical offices. The northern area, on the north side of Rancho
Pueblo Road, consists of two development sites and each will have only one access from the road
with adequate internal cimulation.
Site Plan
The southern area will consist of 4 two-story office buildings in the center of the site. The diagonal
placement of two of the four office buildings on the site has created several large planting areas and
buffer zones between the parking lot and the buildings. The angular placement of the buildings has
also created a triangular plaza between the four buildings. The plaza area is well designed with a
fountain as the focal point and shade trees interspersed throughout.
R:~D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
4
In addition, there are three covered trellises placed in front of the buildings that cover the walkway
around the perimeter of the plaza. In the southwest and southeast corners of this site, along SR-79
South are two restaurant sites. Each of these pads has been designed with their own small plazas
and a fountain placed near the SR-79 South frontage.
The northern development area backs up to a residential neighborhood and consists of two
development sites. One is planned for a stand-alone office user and the other for a self-storage
facility. The storage facility is designed in typical fortress fashion with its buildings creating the outer
walls of the project. Internal to the site are 2 two-story buildings with a drive aisle between them that
rises above the internal street grade permitting access to the second story units.
Architecture
The style of the architecture for all buildings can best be described as Spanish Eclectic. Towers
enhance the entries of the buildings and offer defined focal points for each building. The office
buildings are two stories with numerous windows, in a variety of styles, and a few balconies and
open stairways. Off-white, smooth trowel stucco is the primary building finish with beige accenting
at window recess and on cornices. Ceramic tile is used around the base of the buildings. Attached
trellises with column supports are used at various locations around the buildings for shading,
accenting, and relief. The roofs of the office and restaurant buildings will be finished with "S" style
clay tile. The restaurants are single story and utilize many of the same architectural elements used
for the office. Circular towers and decorative paving are both used to define the entries.
The storage facility is a blend of Spanish architecture. A square tower identifies the entrance to the
facility. A mix of split-face block or dark finish stucco as a wainscoting is used around the base of
the building. Offsets and accent columns are used extensively to break-up the length of the storage
facility's exterior elevations. Spanish style tile is used around the perimeter buildings while the
interior two-story building will be finished with a parapet. Some variations in the parapet height are
offered to break the long horizontal line of the building. The walls of this building offer simple
accenting to break-up the wall mass if visible from outside the property.
Parking
The professional center was designed to accommodate the office and restaurant users while the
storage facility meets its parking needs based on the unit capacity. The site plan exceeds the
parking needs by 36 spaces. With the proposed uses there is the possibility that additional
handicap space may be required. The extra spaces offer the applicant the flexibility to
accommodate their tenants.
Parkin,q:
Lot I Mini-storage
Lot 2 Office (Pad A)
Lot 3 Restaurant (Pad B)
Lot 4 Office (Pad C)
Lot 5 Office (Pad D)
Lot 6 Office (Pad E)
Lot 7 Office (Pad F)
Lot 8 Restaurant (Pad G)
Total Parking:
Ratio Required Provided
13,046 square feet/(1:300)
13,046 square feet/(1:300)
6,000 square feet/(1:100)
21,960 square feet/(1:300)
20,270 square feet/(1:300)
20,270 square feet/(1:300)
21,960 square feet/(1:300)
6,000 square feet/(1:100)
4 spaces 5 spaces
44 spaces 44 spaces
60 spaces 53 spaces*
74 spaces 146 spaces*
68 spaces 34 spaces*
68 spaces 29 spaces*
74 spaces 133 spaces*
60 spaces 46 spaces*
452 spaces 488 spaces
* Total parking within parcel boundary. Reciprocal parking will be available for Lots 3 - 8
R:\D P~.003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff repot[ PC 8-20-03.doc
5
Landscaping
Substantial landscaping is proposed along SR-79 South, along the perimeter of the site, and
throughout the parking lot. The corners of this project along SR-79 South are complemented by
distinctive corner statements that include a project monument sign, a grouping of trees
(Jacarandas), and flowering shrubs and groundcover. Berms and shrubs are used along the
highway to screen the parking lots and break up length of the street frontage. The perimeter
landscaping along the street frontages will be London Plane trees placed 30 feet on center. A
variety of ground covers will be used under the street trees that include: Ice Plant, Myoporum, Ivy
Geranium, Rosemary, Jasmine, and Periwinkle. Hedgerows of Photinia and Tobira will be used to
screen the parking lots as needed. The variety of trees in the plaza will include: Date Palms,
Strawberry Trees, and Jacarandas.
The exterior of the storage facility is flanked with rows of trees and shrubs to accent the building.
Along the north side of the storage facility will be an offset row of trees (Sweet Bay), ground covers
and shrubs to accent the building mass that faces the single-family homes.
Conditional Use Permit
A Conditional Use Permit is required to operate a storage facility as required by the PDO-6 Land
Use Matrix. This development consists of a 1-story 1,307 square foot office, three 1 -story buildings
and two 2-story buildings for a total of 108,844 square feet. A manager's residential unit is not
proposed. The building pad along the rear of the project area is setback 20 feet from the property
line shared and abuts three single-family lots.
ANALYSIS
Tentative Parcel Map
The map creates lots that are consistent with the City's subdivision ordinance and PDO. Street
improvements will be made prior to final occupancy of the first building. The property being divided
with this map is not considered sensitive habitat nor has it been set aside for agricultural
conservation.
Development on the site's intended to function as a center with shared parking, cross-lot access,
and creation of a property owner's association. The map is being conditioned to require the
applicant to submit a copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) prior to
recordation of the map. This document shall include provisions that provide mutual ingress/egress
and cross-lot access for the eight lots to utilize all four points of access to the surrounding streets,
and establishes mutual responsibility for all commonly accessed areas and street front landscaping.
Development Plan
The layout and arrangement of buildings on these sites offers good access and cimulation. The
applicant has created a site where pedestrian interaction between businesses is possible throughout
the site and along the internal streets. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and
determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site.
The project conforms to all of the development regulations of the Planned Development Overlay-6
(PDO-6) zoning district. The building setbacks meet or exceed the minimum requirements of 20 feet.
The overall .40 floor area ratio (FAR) is well below the maximum 1.0 FAR permitted in the PDO.
Within the development, 35 more parking spaces are provided than are needed. The distribution of
R:~D P~.003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
6
the parking is functional and accessible to all building entry points. The inclusion of plazas is
consistent with the PDO and these areas create unique gathering places in peaceful settings. As
designed, this site meets the intent of PDO and avoids the appearance of strip development
The architectural design of the office buildings and the storage facility are consistent with the PDO
and General Plan's criteria by offering distinctive styling, extensive accenting, and articulation. As
required, they are compatible with the other proposed buildings in the area and the neighboring
single-family homes.
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the PDO and the Design
Guidelines. Tree placement around the perimeter of the site will define the project area as will the
selective use of accent trees and shrubs throughout the site. Centralization of the plaza with its
amenities ties the project together.
Conditional Use Permit
The storage facility, although large, has been designed with extensive articulation and accenting to
give the building interest in compliance with PDO-6 and the City's Development Code standards for
self-storage facilities. Staff had concerns that the mass and height of the buildings would be
imposing on the existing single-family homes. To assess this concern the applicant placed a series
of helium balloons the length of the site and height of the buildings. When viewed from the
properties to the north, the ridgeline of the buildings did not obstruct the view of the mountains to the
south. In addition, the applicant contacted the adjacent owners and has provided staff with letters
from the owners, which indicate that they have no objections. (See Attachment # 5)
The facility has been set back from the front, side, and rear property lines as required in PDO-6.
These areas around the building have been heavily landscaped, which further accents and screens
the buildings. Internal circulation of the site is functional and meets the Fire Department's standards
for emergency access. The applicant has requested that the site be accessed from 6:00 A.M. to
9:00 PM. Staff is concerned that 6:00 A.M. may be too early and could create unnecessary noise for
nearby residents. Staff recommends and has conditioned access between the hours of 7:00 A.M. to
9:00 P.M. As conditioned, staff has determined that the required findings to approve the Conditional
Use Permit can be made.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff has reviewed all three projects for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.
These projects are consistent with the PDO, which was approved with a Mitigated Negative
Declaration. Therefore, staff can make the Determination of Consistency with Section 15162 of the
CEQA Guidelines and no further environmental review is necessary based on the following
reasons:
· The projects: an office professional center, a mini-storage facility, and an 8-lot parcel map
are consistent with the standards set forth for this property in PDO-6, which anticipated this
type of development.
· The development and mapping of this property does not change the circumstances or add
to the severity of previously identified effects.
· No new information has come to light with the proposal to develop and map the property
that would change the assessments made to PDO-6's Negative Declaration.
R:\D p",2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
7
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
These projects are consistent with Planned Development Overlay-6 (PDO-6) zoning and land use
designations of the Temecula General Plan. Upon approval of the Development Plan as
conditioned, the project will meet ali of the guidelines and standards for commercial development
prescribed by PDO-6, the Development Code, and Design Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
.As conditioned, the applications meet the intent of PDO-6 and the land uses envisioned for this area
~n the General Plan. The projects as conditioned are consistent with applicable City policies,
standards and guidelines. Staff believes these projects will establish a high quality development,
and will represent an attractive, functional, economic, and welcome addition to the City's office and
commemial opportunities.
FINDINGS - TENTATIVE MAP (PA02-0512):
The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, General Plan, and the City of
Temecula Municipal Code;
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that Tentative Parcel Map No. 30797 is
consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, and
the Municipal Code.
The tentative map does not divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant
to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land
conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be
too small to sustain their agricultural use;
The proposed land division is not land designated for conservation or agricultural use.
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by
the tentative map;
The project consists of a Parcel Map on property designated for office and commercial uses,
which is consistent with the General Plan, as well as, the development standards for the
Planned Development Overlay zoning designation that applies to this property.
The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval,
are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat;
There are no known environmental sensitive fish or wildlife orthe habitat on this site. The
mapping of this property in and of itself will not create activities to take place on this
property. Therefore this subdivision will not cause significant damage to the environment.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious
public health problems;
The project has been reviewed and commented on by the Fire Safety Division and the
Building Safety Division. As a result, the project will be conditioned to address their
R:~D P~.003\O3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
8
concerns. Further, provisions are made in the General Plan and the Development Code to
ensure that the public health, safety and welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent
with these documents.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible;
All future construction will require compliance with all building codes and required energy
efficiency standards.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements
acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to
those previously acquired by the public will be provided;
Road dedications and easements ha ye been conditioned for the map and the Public Works
Department has no concerns regarding potential conflicts with easements or accesses
related to the proposed division of land.
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby);
This is a map for non-residential use and will not be subject Quimby fees.
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PA03-0233 and PA03-0234)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Professional Office (PO) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for the Planned Development Overlay-6 (PDO-6) and the City of
Temecula Development Code. The site is therefore properlyplanned and zoned and found
to be physically suitable for commercial retail and restaurant uses.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The architecture proposed for the projects is consistent with the Architecture/requirements
as stated in Planned Development Overlay-6 (PDO-6) and Design Guidelines and the
Commercial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The project has been
reviewed for, and as conditioned, is found to be consistent with, all applicable policies,
guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be
constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and we/fare.
FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PA03-0234)
The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development
Code.
The proposed self-storage use is consistent with the underlying General Plan land use
designation of Professional Office and the Z-1 Oveday, the applicable sections of the
Planned Development Overlay-6 (PDO-6), the Development Code, and the Municipal Code.
R:\D P~2003~3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
9
The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of
adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely
affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
The proposed self-storage uses design element required in the City of Temecula General
Plan. As proposed and conditioned, this project is consistent with the City of Temecula
General Plan and the applicable sections of PDO-6, the Development Code, and the
Municipal Code.
The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and other
development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning
Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
The proposed self-storage use provides a significant landscape buffer along the front and
rear (25 and 20 feet respectfully) property lines, provides accented and articulated walls for
screening, and provide sufficient parking and loading in compliance with the standard
adopted in PDO-6 zoning requirements and the City's Development Code for integration into
the surrounding commercial developments.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and
welfare of the community.
Provisions are made in the General Plan, PDO-6, and the Development Code to ensure that
the public health, safety, and welfare are safeguarded with the operation and design of
storage facilities. The project is consistent with these documents and will be conditioned to
meet all applicable requirements.
The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use permit is based on substantial
evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council.
The project has been completely reviewed, as a who/e, in reference to all applicable codes
and ordinances before the Planning Commission.
R:\O P~2003~3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
10
Attachments:
1. Exhibits - Blue Page 12
PA02-0512, PA03-0233, and PA03-0234
A Vicinity Map
B Zoning Map
C General Plan
PA02-0512 - Page 15
A Tentat!ve Parcel Map
PA03-0233 - Pages 16-20
A Site Plan
B-1 Elevations
B-2 Elevations
B-3 Elevations
C Landscape Plan
PA03-0234- Pages 21-26
A Enlarged Site Plan
B-1 Elevations
B-2 Elevations
B-3 Elevations
C Rendering
2. PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 27
Exhibit A Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 31
3. PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 44
Exhibit A Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 47
4. PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 62
Exhibit A Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 66
5. Neighborhood Response Letters - Blue Page 83
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional CenteAStaff report PC 8-20-03.doc
11
A'I'rACHMENT NO. 1
EXHIBITS
R:\D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
12
CITY OF TEMECULA
[Project site
PLANNING APPLICATION NO'S. PA02-0512, PA03-0233, and PA03-0234
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
VICINITY MAP
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
13
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - PDO-6 (Planned Development Overlay-6)
EXHIBIT C GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION -PO (Professional Office))
PLANNING APPLICATION NO'S. PA02-0512, PA03-0233, and PA03-0234 ·
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
14
CITY OFTEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO PA02-0512
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
Tentative Parcel Map No. 30797
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff reporl PC 8-20-03.doc
15
CITY OF TEMECULA
.~_,~cEo' ~,u_?_~o,,,...__ ~ __ : ~_-
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0233 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT A SITE PL
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
R:~D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
16
CITY OFTEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0233 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT B-1
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
ELEVATIONS
R:~D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho P~eblo Professional Center, Staff repor~ PC 8-20-03.doc
17
ClTY OFTEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0233 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT B-2
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
ELEVATIO~
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff repot[ PC 8-20-03.doc
18
CITY OFTEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0233 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT B-3
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
ELEVATIONS
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
19
CITY OF TEMECULA
L
,,~,, I,~ IJ.~, I.,, ,I
II~.~,,I II,llJJ~i ,1!1,1 ~
r,lill, l!l'l_~lJ,,lllj I~
i~lll,~iillil~llllllltt,ill,l
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0233 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT C
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
LANDSCAPE
R:~D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
20
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0234 (Condition Use Permit)
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
SITE PLAN
R:~D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
21
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0234 (Condition Use Permit)
EXHIBIT B-1
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
ELEVATI~
R:\D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff reporl PC 8-20-03.doc
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0234 (Condition Use Permit)
EXHIBIT B-2
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
ELEVATIONS
R:\D P~003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
23
Il I Ii, I
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0234 (Condition Use Permit)
EXHIBIT B-3
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
ELEVA7
R:~D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0234 (Condition Use Permit)
EXHIBIT C
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
ELEVATION DETAIL
R:~) P~003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
25
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0234 (Condition Use Permit)
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 20, 2003
RENDERI~
R:\D P~003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
26
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PC RESOLUTION NO 2003-
PA02-0512
R:~D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center\Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
27
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA02-0512 FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30797, A
REQUEST TO DIVIDE 14.48 ACRES INTO 8 PARCELS WITH A
MINIMUM GROSS LOT SIZE OF 43,677 SQUARE FEET,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, EAST
OF AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, AND THE FUTURE RANCHO
PUEBLO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO'S. 959-
070-001 THRU 003.
WHEREAS, Stan Heaton with Temecula Engineering Consultants, filed Planning Application
No. PA02-0512, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA02-0512 was processed including, but not limited to
a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA02-0512 on August 20, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission Hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA02-
0512 subject to the conditions after finding that the map proposed in Planning Application No. PA02-
0512 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA02-0512 (Tentative Parcel Map No30797) hereby makes the following findings as required by
Section 16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, General Plan, and the City of
Temecula Municipal Code;
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that Tentative Parcel Map No. 30797 is
consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, and
the Municipal Code.
B. The tentative map does not divide land which is subject to a contract entered into
pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land
conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small
to sustain their agricultural use;
R:~D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center\Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
28
The proposed land division is not land designated for conservation or agricultural use.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the tentative map;
The project consists of a Parcel Map on property designated for office and commercial
uses, which is consistent with the General Plan, as well as, the development standards for
the Planned Development Overlay zoning designation that applies to this property.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidable
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
There are no known environmental sensitive fish or wildlife or the habitat on this site. The
mapping of this property in and of itself will not create activities to take place on this
property. Therefore this subdivision will not cause significant damage to the environment.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems;
The project has been reviewed and commented on by the Fire Safety Division and the
Building Safety Division. As a result, the project will be conditioned to address their
concerns. Further, provisions are made in the General Plan and the Development Code to
ensure that the public health, safety and welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent
with these documents.
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible;
All future construction will require compliance with all building codes and required energy
efficiency standards.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent
to those previously acquired by the public will be provided;
Road dedications and easements have been conditioned for the map and the Public Works
Department has no concerns regarding potential conflicts with easements or accesses
related to the proposed division of land.
Ho
(Quimby);
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements
This is a map for non-residential use and will not be subject Quimby fees.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance A Notice of Determination for Planning Application
No. 02-0512 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162. This
section applies when a Negative Declaration has been adopted for a project, no subsequent studies
shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in
the Environment Initial Study.
R:~D P'~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
29
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA02-0512 (Tentative Parcel Map)for a Tentative
Parcel Map request to divide 14.48 acres into 8 parcels with a minimum gross lot size of 43,677,
located on the north side of Highway 79 South, east of Avenida de Missiones, and the future
Rancho Pueblo Road, known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 959-070-001 thru 003. The Conditions of
Approval are contained in Exhibit A.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 20th day of August 2003.
ATTEST:
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
{SEAL}
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat
PC Resolution No. 2003-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of August 2003, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
3O
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA02-0512 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
R:\D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
31
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA02-0512 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 30797)
Project Description:
A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide 14.48 acres into 8
parcels
Location:
The north side of Highway 79 South, east of Avenida de
Missiones, and the future Rancho Pueblo Road.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 959-070-001 thru 003
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
August 20, 2003
August 20, 2005
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning
Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount
of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the
Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Community Development Department -
Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be
void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified bythe conditions listed below.
A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City
Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
R:'~D P~003~3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
32
4. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Planning
Application Nos. PA03-0233 and PA03-0234.
5. The applicant, project, and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with ail
mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program for this site
filed under Planning Application No. 00-0522.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
The land-divider shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all landscaped areas
and parkways, until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as
approved by the Director of Planning
The final location of the sidewalk along SR-79 South shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Planning and the Director of Public Works. A copy of the Rough Grading plans
shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
*A qualified paleontologist/archaeologist shall be chosen by the developer for consultation
and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological/
archaeological impacts. A meeting between the paleontologist/archaeologist, Planning
Department staff, and grading contractor prior to the commencement of grading operations
and the excavation shall be arranged. The paleontologist/archaeologist or representative
shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery
of artifacts and fossils.
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
10.
The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division:
a A copy of the Final Map.
b A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes as
deemed necessary:
i) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the
California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations,
Ordinance No. 655.
ii) A Mitigation Monitoring Program was prepared for this project and is on file
(PA01-0522) at the City of Temecula Planning Department.
iii) This project is within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone.
iv) This project is within a 100-year flood hazard zone.
v) This project is within a liquefaction hazard zone.
vi) This project is within a Subsidence Zone.
c A copy of the Revised Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
i) CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open
space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings
and all landscaped and open areas including parkways.
F{:~D P~2.003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-O3.doc
33
11.
12.
13.
ii)
iii)
No lot in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association,
property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to
assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any
rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the
development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses
of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of
said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall
operate under recorded CC&R's, which shall include compulsory
membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services,
Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions
required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of
compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to
making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the
City for public purposes.
Every owner of a building or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such
building or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and
facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an
association owning the common areas and facilities.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use
Agreement, which provides for cross-lot access and parking across all lots and establishes
mutual responsibility for all commonly accessed areas and street front landscaping.
Prior to recordation of a final map, the subdivider shall submit the landscape plans for the
State Route 79 South frontage and internal street network for review and approval by the
Planning Department. Upon acceptance of the plans by the City, the subdivider shall submit
suitable guarantee of the construction in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
Landscape plans shall be submitted as follows as follows:
a. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. TI-ie location,
number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans
shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The cover page
shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans
shall be accompanied by the following items:
i) Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
ii) One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
iii) Water usage calculations per Chapter i7.32 of the Development Code
(Water Efficient Ordinance).
iv) Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the
approved plan).
v) Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans
including all structural setback measurements.
vi) Automatic irrigation for all landscape areas and complete screening of all
ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and
adjacent property.
R:~D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff reporl PC 8-20-03.doc
34
14.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
15.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first building on the site, the applicant
shall fully improve the landscaping along SR-79 South frontage and internal street networks
in accordance with the approved construction plans on fine in the Planning Department.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
16.
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
General Requirements
17.
^ Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
18.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
19.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-way
per Caltrans letters dated May 16, 2002 and May 22, 2002.
20.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
21.
All on-site drainage facilities shall be maintained by a private maintenance association or
property owner.
22.
The vehicular movement for Highway 79 South at the easterly access to the site shall be
restricted to a right in/right out movement subject to approval by Caltrans. The method of
controlling this movement shall be approved by the Director of Public Works.
Prior to Approval of the Parcel Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall
complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement
agreements executed and securities posted:
23.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c Caltrans
d City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
R:~D P~.003V33-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
35
24.
25.
26.
e
f
g
h
i
k
m
n
o
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
Community Services District
Verizon
Southern CaLifornia Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
Fish & Game
Army Corps of Engineers
The Developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following improvements to
City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works:
a Improve Highway 79 South (Urban Arterial Highway Standards) to include installation
of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer)
b Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Rancho Pueblo
Road
c All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement
transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
The Developer shall design the following improvements to meet City public road standards
and remain privately maintained until a connection is made to a publicly maintained road to
the east. The following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets as
shown on the site plan:
a Rancho Pueblo Road - Entry (88' R/W) to include the installation of street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and
sewer)
b Rancho Pueblo Road (66' R/W) to include the installation of street improvements,
paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer)
c Street "A" (66' R/VV) to include the installation of street improvements, paving, curb
and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer)
d All intersections shall be perpendicular (90).
Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of
the street improvement plans:
a Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P,C.C. and 1.00% minimum
over A.C. paving,
b Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard No. 207A.
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center\Staff reporl PC 8-20-03.doc
36
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
C
f
g
h
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400
and 401.
Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the
project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining propedies.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate
right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
All new utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other
disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Highway 79 South on the Parcel Map with
the exception of 2 openings as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel Map.
Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities
shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or
other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved bythe Department
of Public Works.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which is part of an
existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior to
City Council approval of the Parcel Map, the Developer shall make an application for
reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Parcel
Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A
copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject
property.
R:'tD P~2003M)3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
37
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the
Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant
to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall
provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report
obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been
approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the intent to Develop. Conduit
shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
The Developer shell obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property
to the west.
Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated
and noted on the final map.
Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel Map or
issuance of building permits.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division
boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and
recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located
outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the
final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating, "drainage easements shall be kept
free of buildings and obstructions."
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
42.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Caltrans
Fish & Game
Army Corp of Engineers
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
43.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property
R:',D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
38
44.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
45.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
46.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
47.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
48.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
49.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
50.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
51.
Prior to the first building permit, a Parcel Map No. 30797 shall be recorded, unless otherwise
approved by the Director of Public Works.
52.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and
site conditions.
53.
The Developer shall pay a mitigation fee in an amount acceptable to the Department of
Public Works. Said fee shall reflect the percentage of impact at each intersection and shall
be in accordance to the traffic impact analysis dated May 17, 2002.
54.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
39
55.
The Developer shall pay the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
56.
Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy,
a the traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Rancho Pueblo Road
shall be installed and operational
b Rancho Pueblo Road shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans.
c Street "A" shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans
57.
58.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a Rancho California Water District
b Eastern Municipal Water District
c Department of Public Works
All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per the
approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
59.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
60.
Any previous existing conditions for this project or underlying map will remain in full force
and effect unless superceded by more stringent requirements here.
61.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
62.
63.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division
per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water
system capable of delivering 1500 G PM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour
duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect
changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all
information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Iii.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no mere than 250 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The
R:\D P~2003',03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Cente~Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
40
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade
of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commemial land
division per CFC Appendix III-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project,
a water system capable of delivering 4000 G PM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a
4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to
reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as
approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into
account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade
of existing fire hydrants maybe required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial.
(CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4)
All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are
prohibited, except those expressly approved by the fire prevention bureau individually on a
case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii.
Cul-de-sacs and/or intersections with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed
travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible
provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level.
Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on each
side unless the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular road.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) This will include all internal roads,
connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access must be in
and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved on a separate map,
and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 160 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet,
(CFC sec 902)
R:~D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
41
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than 35
homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access (except Parcel
2), via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall
be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
78.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
Special Conditions
79.
80.
Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall
include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block
walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A)
Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a
georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including
parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI
Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone
VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and
format prior to satisfaction of this condition.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
81. Once this Tentative Parcel Map is approved along with the new land use of Professional
Office, these parcels will be assessed accordingly for Temecula's Parks and Lighting
Special Tax.
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
42
OTHER AGENCIES
82.
In accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated October
21,2002, a copy of which is attached. This project would not be impacted by District Master
Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed.
83.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit
Agency's transmittal dated December 10, 2002, a copy of which is attached.
84.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth with the Pechanga Cultural
Resources transmittal dated November 4, 2002, a copy of which is attached.
85.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated October 3, 2002, a copy of which is attached.
86.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Southern California
Edison transmittal dated, January 25 2003, a copy of which is attached.
* Denotes Mitigation Measure for Planned Development Overlay-6 (PA-01-0522)
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept al the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Signature
Applicants Name Printed'
R:~D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
43
A'I-rACHMENT NO. 3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
PA03-0233
R:~) P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
44
October 3, 2002
Thomas Thornsley, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
T
SUBJECT:
OCT 0 4 2002
WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL MAP NO. 30797
APN 959-070-001, APN 959-070-002, AND APN.959-070r003
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0512
ao~ a. no~,,a Dear Mr. Thornsley:
Caaba F. Ko
Please .be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner, and the construction of ail required
water facilities. RCWD will require the use of recycled water for the
!andseaping of this development as well as the adjoining development.
Each 10t' will be r~quired to install individuai water meters and individual fire
prevention systems. The customer wilt need to contact RCWD for fees and
requirements for any required fire protection systems.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you should ·have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
02~SB:at260~F012.T6~FCF
Andrew Webster, Planning & Capital Projects Manager
Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
General Manager-Cliie£ Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
i AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Te~ecula
Planning L~epartment
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention.""~140 NV~
Ladies and Gentlemen:
1995MARKET STREET
KIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909.955.1200
909.788.9965 FAX
51180.1
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities. The District also does not plan check oih' land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for SUCh cases. Distnct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific interest to tho District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other re~lional flood
control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical componanf or extension of a master p~an system
and District Area urainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees), n add tion, nformat on of a 9enera nature s
provided.
The District has ri. et reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
regional interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Distdct standards, and Distdct plan check and
insPection will be required for Distdct acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be
considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The DiStdct woul(~ consider accepting oWnership ot such tac~l~t~es on written request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Distdct standards and D~strict plan check and inspection will
be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and adm n strat ve fees wi be required.
This project is located within the limits of the District's Area
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable tees should be paid by cashier's'
check or money order only to the Flood Control Distdct pdor to issuance of building or grading permits
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actua
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Confl'ol Board. Clearance for grading, recordation or other final approva/should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a perm t or s shown to be exempt.
If this pr.o, ject inv,o, lves a Federa! Emergen,c.y Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require me appdcant to provide all stueies, calculations, plans and other reformation required to meet FEMA
requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) pdor to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601!1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Se.gtion 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies
indicating the prgject is exempt from these reqmrements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Cert~cation
may .b,e required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404
permi[.
Very truly yours,
STUART fi. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: ..~.O
Riverside Transit/~
1825 Third Street
P.O. Box 59968
Riverside, CA 92517-1968
Phone: (909) 565-5000
Fax: (909) 565-5001
December 10, 2002
Mr. Thomas Thomsley, Case Planner
Planning Dept.
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT: PA02-0562, PA02-0512 and related Parcel Map cases along north side of South State
Hwy 79 at comer Avenida de Misiones - Comments from RTA
Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plans for the proposed community facility,
medical office, and related development along South State Highway 79 near Avenida de
Misiones. RTA Bus Route 24 presently serves the corner of Highway 79 and Pechanga
Parkway, about 1 mile W of the site. However, the Transit Agency anticipates a potential for
extending new bus service at a future date along this portion Highway 79 adjacent to the project.
RTA recognizes Temecula for consistently requiring project designs that are pedestrian-friendly
and supportive of public transit. To encoUrage and enhance greater future transit use reiative to
this project, RTA recommends the site plan be revised, if necessary, to include the following
transit-friendly features:
At least one paved, lighted, and ADA-compliant, appropriately placed transit bus turnout
with related amenities should be indicated for each development application along the
north side of State Highway 79 to serve the project and its vicinity. Staff suggests the
following Curbside locations along Hwy 79 be considered:
1) Between the worship center and the parking structUre on Tentative PM #30798;
2) Between the sit-down restaurant and parking for the Med Bidg' proposed for Parcel 4
of Tentative PM#30797.
The bus stops at these turnouts should incorporate paved passenger waiting areas and
adequate space for installation of passenger benches, shelters and bus route signage by
RTA, the City or its designee at a future date.
· Identify ADA-compliant pedestrian access from major project features to the bus stops by
means of designated walkways that avoid crossing interior vehicle circulation patterns as
much as possible.
F:\data\P~anning\MikeM\Word'~Dev Review\Temecula\Rancho Comm Church - RTA Ltrhd.doc
Riverside Transit Agency
1825 Third Street
P.O. Box 59968
Riverside, CA 92517-1968
Phone: (909) 565-5000
Fax: (909) 565-5001
If you need further clarification or I can be of further assistance, please call me at (909) 565-5164
or contact me online at mmccoy~riversidetransit,com.
Sincerely,
Michael McCoy
Senior Planner
:: F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word~Dev Review\Temecula\Rancho Comm Church - RTA Ltrhd.doc
Chairperson:
Germaine Arenas
PECHANGA CULTURAL RESOURCES
Temecula Band of Luise~o Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 * Temecula, CA 92593
Telephone (909) 308-9295 · Fax (909) 506~9491
November 4, 2002
NO¥ 0 6 ~00~
Thomas K. Thomsley, Associate Planner
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Mr. Thomsley:
Re: TPM Bridgeport Rancho Community Church
(Planning Application No. PA02-0562)
Committee Members:
Mary Magee
Aurelia Marruffo
Evie Gerber
Darlene Sotelo
Nadine A. Murphy
Raymond Basquez
Coordinator:.
Benjamin Maslel
Monitor Supervisor:
Manuel Masiel
Cultural Analyst:
John A. Gomez, Jr.
Directo~
Gary DuBois
The Pechanga Band of Luisefio Mission Indians, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
.::~ ..... -.. ~ :::::.:~(h~reinafler,_the..P_echangaBaffd,2):submits~the:fOllOwin-gr~O~ent~ t6:the~TPM: - :: :: -z.~ · _::..P:. ::. :_
Bridgeport Rancho Community Church (Planning Application No. PA02-0562)
(hereinafter, "the Project").
The Pechanga/Luiseno people have called this area home since time immemorial and are
an integral part of the pre-history and history of the Temecula Valley and the City of
Temecula.. And the Pechanga Band has worked diligently to ensure that our history and
culture is protected;and preserved for:futtim generations. Amdto this end, ~e request
active involvement and input regarding the Project. The Project is located in an area that
is rich with cultural resources associated and affiliated with the'Pechanga/Luiseno people,
and the Pechanga'Band proposes the actions below in order to properly protect all
cultural resources that may be impacted by the build out of the Project.
Proposed Mitigation Measures/Conditions of Approval for the Proiect
The Enviroranental Checklist for the Project at pages 21-22 recognizes that the Project is
located in a culturally rich area and the Eastern Information Center recommends specific
procedures for proper mitigation of the Project site. The Pechanga Band believes that
additional measures should be taken to properly address the impacts that may occur to
cultural resoumes.
1. Prior to the issue of a grading permit, the Project oWner/developer shall enter
into an agreement with the Pechanga Band that addresses the disposition of all
' cultural resources that may be impacted as a result of the build out'of the
: project.: TM
:~: 2; Prior ~to~the ig~u¢ of a:grading permit, Phase II testing for the Project sh0uid
· . , ,~ notbeldone soleyas:acontr011eddestmction as desCribed,-butit:sh0ui3 '
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
include a plan for controlled excavations of the Project site and evaluation and
review of the report prior to mass soil removal or grading of the Project site.
3. Prior to the issue ora grading permit, upon the review and evaluation of the
cultural resource management report, a qualified archaeologist and
representatives of the Pechanga Band shall meet to prepare a mitigation
monitoring plan for the Project. The plan may include the requirement that a
qualified archaeologist and members of the Pechanga Band be present during
all ground disturbance activities associated with the Project.
4. If any cultural resources are exposed during initial grading and ground
disturbance activities, the Pechanga Band will evaluate the resources and
provide recommendations regarding proper mitigation of the resources.
5. And with regards to the disposition of Native American human remains (14.
CulturalResources d., p.22), the procedures set forth under Public Resources
Code Sec. 5097.97 et al shall govern such inadvertent discoveries. Based on
the location of the Project and its proximity to the Pechanga/ndian
Reservation, the Pechanga Band will exercise all its rights under existing state
and federal laws regarding the discovery of Native American remains.
Working together, on a government-to-government basis, the Pechanga Band and the
City of Temecula can preserve and protect the invaluable Luisefio resources within the
City's sphere of influence. The Pechanga Band appreciates the opportunity to provide
comments on the TPM Bridgeport Rancho Community Church (Planning Application
No. PA02-0562), and we look forward to working together with the City of Temecula to
protect the invaluable Luiseno cultural resources.
Sincerely,
loire A. Gomez, Jr.
Cultural Resource Analyst
Pechanga Cultural Resources · Temecula Band of Luise~o Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 ~ Temecula, CA 92592
:.'. : ~ . '.- Sacred 15 The, Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
SOUTHERN CAU~:ORNIA
EDISON®
An EDISON INTERNATIONAL® Company
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
January 25, 2003
Attention: Planning Department
Subject: Parcel Map No. 15211, 30797 and 30798
Please be advised that the division of the property shown on the above
referenced pamel.maps will not unreasonably interfere with the free and
complete exercise of any easements held by Southern California Edison
Company within the boundaries of said map.
This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights,
· ~ title and interest in and to said easement(s), nor should this letter be construed
as a waiver of any of ~h~.e__provi.s[o_n_s_contain..e_d_..!r~. ~a[~.~_asemen~(s) or a_._w~!~e~.9_f _ =::_. ...........
~"~ ......... ':' ......... ~)~i~-f0r ~3~i6h of'~'ti~) ~ffe-ct~ffaCiliti~S. ~
In the event that the development requires relocation of facilities, on the subject
property, which facilities exist by right of easement or otherwise, the
owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost of such relocation and provide
Edison with suitable replacement dghts.:-Such costs and replacement dghts are
required prior to the performance of the relocation.
If additional information is required in connection with the above mentioned
subject, please contact me at 714-934-0838. -
Lisa Salinas
Title and Real Estate Services
Corporate Real Estate Department
cc: TEC
14799 Chestnut Street
Westminster, CA 92683 · · , ·
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA03-0233 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF AN 11.02 ACRE MIXED-USE
PROFESSIONAL CENTER WHICH INCLUDES FIVE PROPOSED
OFFICE BUILDINGS, TOTALING 97,506 SQUARE FEET, AND
· TWO RESTAURANT/RETAIL BUILDINGS, TOTALING 12,000
SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY
79 SOUTH, EAST OF AVENIDA DE MlSSlONES, AND THE
FUTURE RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR
PARCEL NO.'S 959-070-001 THRU 003.
WHEREAS, Mel Malkoff with Malkoff & Associates, filed Planning Application No. PA03-
0233, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA03-0233 was processed including, but not limited to
public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA03-0233 on
August 20, 2003, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA03-0233;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 2. F ndin.qs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
03-0233 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula
Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Professional Office (PO) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for the Planned Development Overlay-6 (PDO-6) and the City of
TemeculaDevelopmentCode. Thesiteisthereforeproperlyplannedandzonedandfound
to be physically suitable for commercial retail and restaurant uses.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
R:\D P~003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
45
The architecture proposed for the projects is consistent with the Architectural requirements
as stated in Planned Development Overlay-6 (PDO-6) and Design Guidelines and the
Commercial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The project has been
reviewed for, and as conditioned, is found to be consistent with, all applicable policies,
guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be
constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance A Notice of Determination for Planning Application
No. 03-0233 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162. This
section applies when a Negative Declaration has been adopted for a project, no subsequent studies
shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in
the Environment Initial Study.
Section 4. Conditions That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA03-0233, a Development Plan to design, and
construct a mixed-use professional center with 7 buildings for medical office, restaurant, and other
uses with a total of 109,506 square feet of floor area on an 11.02 acre lot on the north side of
Highway 79 South, east of Avenida de Missiones, and the future Rancho Pueblo Road, known as
Assessor Parcel Nos. 959-070-001 thru 003. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 20th day of August 2003.
ATTEST:
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
{SEAL}
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the
th
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20 day of August 2003, by the following
vote;
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:'~D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
46
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA03-0233 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
R:\D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center\Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
47
EXHIBIT A
CITY OFTEMECULA
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA03-0233 (Development Plan)
Project Description:
A Development Plan for the design, construction and
operation of a mixed-use professional center with five
medical office buildings and two restaurants/retail
buildings for a total of 109,506 square feet of floor area
on the north side of Highway 79 South, east of Avenida
de Missiones, and the future Rancho Pueblo Road.
DIF Category:
Professional Office/Service Commercial
Assessor Parcel No.:
959-070-001 thru 003
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
August 20, 2003
August 20, 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00)
for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as
provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of
Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer
has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Department the
check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of
failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counset, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and ail action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
48
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA02-
0512 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 30797), unless superseded by these conditions of approval.
All these conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
conditional use permit.
The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application
No. PA01-0522 (PDO-6).
If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or
any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or
archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the
City of such and the City shall cause all fudher excavation or other disturbance of the
affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may
require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the
City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at
no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find.
Upon determining that the determination is not an amhaeological/cultural resoume, the
Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize
the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an amhaeological/cultural
resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation
or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have
been approved by the Director of Planning.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit 'W'
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Planning Department. Additionally, the following
criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
a. Relocate the double detector checks in the planters at both entries on the north side
of the site. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water
plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of the transformer and
the double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. If these
devices cannot be place out of a prominent location in public view they must be
installed underground when possible.
b. A final assessment of the placement of fire hydrant and fire apparatus shall be jointly
review by the Planning and Fire Departments to avoid conflicts with necessary
placement of these devices, light standards, and landscaping.
c. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall not be placed in prominent
locations visible to the public. This equipment shall be screened from view.
d. Ground mounted signs must be keep 5 feet behind the property line per the City's
Development Code.
e. Motorcycle and bicycle parking shall be provided evenly dispersed throughout the
site.
R:~D P~2003V)3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff reporl PC 8-20-03.doc
49
10.
11.
12.
The design (color, pattern, finish) of the "decorative paved concrete" shall be subject
to review and approval by Planning prior issuance of building permit
Parking lot lights shall be of a type consistent with the standards defined in PDO-6. The site
lighting plan shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to installation.
Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Details of these lights shall be submitted to
the Planning Department during plan check for review prior to installation. The installation of
wall pack style light shall not be used.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits "B-l, B-2, and B-3"
(Building Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department -
Planning Department. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of
the project:
a. Fountain details shall be provided to the Director of Planning for review and approval
prior to installation.
b. Trash enclosures must be finished to match the building architecture.
c. All utility panels shall be internalized or designed as an integral element of the
building.
d. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements
that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When
determined to be necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet will be raised to
provide for this screening.
The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be
painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely
as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
The Landscaping Plan shall conform to the approved Exhibit "C" (Landscape Plan).
Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
a. Streetscape design consistency and entries that offer a definable statement shall be
integrated into the plans as necessary so the four entries have a consistent design.
b. Perimeter landscaping shall be installed around the entire site with the completion of
the first phase of development. This perimeter landscaping shall include all
streetscape areas and slopes visible from the surrounding roadway.
c. A minimum of 6 feet of landscaping shall be installed behind all sidewalks where non
is shown in Phase I as an interim screening to the undeveloped portions of the site.
d. The landscape plan shall identify the erosion control plant materials to be installed
on all portions of the site reserved for future development.
e. Show and label all utilities on the site and landscape plans and provide appropriate
screening and enlarge planter areas when necessary to achieve the required
screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the
Fire Department before installing the screen. Please group utilities together in order
to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought.
R:\D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
50
As per the Citywide Design Guidelines, 36" box trees shall be utilized to created focal
points, define entries and otherwise offer variation to the overall landscaping design.
The mix of trees shall be as follow: 20% at 36 inch box, 30% at 24 inch box, and
50% at 15 gallon.
A concrete mow curb shall be installed between turf and shrub areas.
13.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
14.
The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board (Exhibit D) contained
on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials
shall require approval of the Director of Planning.
Material
Windows, doors (both used)
Wall face
Wall accents
Wall base
Trellises columns
Trellises and rafters
Roofing
Finish & Color
Wood w/stile & rail pattern
Aluminum storefront (blue) with Solargray glazing
smooth finish stucco-Dauer- Seashell 227
smooth finish stucco-Dauer- China Peach 177
Ceramic Saltinlla Tile - Natural color (terracotta)
Precast concrete
Rough sawn wood
Clay tile "S" Mission Santa Fe Brown
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
15.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
16.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
17.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the
colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the
Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
18. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
19.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Exhibit "C", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with
R:~D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff repor~ PC 8-20-03.doc
51
the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the
landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
Prior to Release of Power
20.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
21.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from
final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have
been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be
released upon request by the applicant.
22.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of pomelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
23.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
R:~D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff repor~ PC 8-20-03.doc
52
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
24.
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
General Requirements
25.
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
26.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
27.
An Encroachment Perm it shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-way
per Caltrans letters dated May 16, 2002 and May 22, 2002.
28.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
29.
All on-site drainage facilities shall be maintained by a private maintenance association or
property owner.
30.
The vehicular movement for Highway 79 South at the easterly access to the site shall be
restricted to a right in/right out movement subject to approval by Caltrans. The method of
controlling this movement shall be approved by the Director of Public Works.
31.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal
systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate
b. Storm drain facilities
c. Sewer and domestic water systems
d. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
32.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
R:~,D P~2.003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
53
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
f.
g.
h.
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Metropolitan Water District
Caltrans
Planning Department
Fire Prevention Bureau
Building and Safety Department
Depariment of Public Works
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
54
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
41.
Prior to the first building permit, a Parcel Map No. 30797 shall be recorded, unless otherwise
approved by the Director of Public Works.
42.
Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. FIowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
43.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Highway 79 South (Urban Arterial Highway Standards) to include installation
of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer)
b. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Rancho Pueblo
Road
44.
Roads shall be designed and constructed to meet City public road standards and remain
privately maintained until a connection is made to a publicly maintained road to the east.
The following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets as shown
on the site plan:
a. Rancho Pueblo Road - Entry (88' RAN) to include the installation of street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and
sewer)
b. Rancho Pueblo Road (66' R/W) to include the installation of street improvements,
paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer)
c. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90).
45.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
46.
Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by Riverside
Transit Agency and approved by the Department of Public Works.
R:\D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff reporl PC 8-20-03.doc
55
47.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shell issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
48.
The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adja~cent property
to the west.
49.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
50.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
51.
The Developer shall pay a mitigation fee in an amount acceptable to the Department of
Public Works. Said fee shall reflect the percentage of impact at each intersection and shall
be in accordance to the traffic impact analysis dated May 17, 2002.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
52.
Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy in Pamel Map No. 30797,
a. The traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Rancho Pueblo Road
shall be installed and operational.
b. Rancho Pueblo Road shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans
c. Street "A" shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans
53.
54.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per the
approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
55.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT
56.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
R:\D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
56
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63,
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on
Mamh 31,2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee
schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Depadment of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
Show all building setbacks.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
R:~D P~2003\O3~3233 Rancho Puebto Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
57
FIRE DEPARTMENT
71.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the
California Building Code {CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in
fome at the time of building, plan submittal.
72.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2000 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 700 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2700 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
73.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads
and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each
intersection and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available
from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be
required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B).
74.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
75.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
76.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent reads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
77.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
78.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6)inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
79.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center\Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
58
80.
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
81.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants
shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible
building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National
Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
82.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
83.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
84.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
85.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
86.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser room door. (CFC 902.4)
87.
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
Special Conditions
88.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
R:~D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
59
89.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
90.
The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
General Conditions
91.
The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
92.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
93.
All parkways including areas within the ROW, fencing, on site lighting and landscaping, shall
be maintained by the property owner or an established maintenance association.
94.
While Rancho Pueblo and Street "A" are private streets, the property owner or business
association will be responsible for the energy/maintenance costs of the streetlights. Once
Rancho Pueblo and Street "A" are accepted as public streets, the City will consider
assuming the energy and maintenance costs if streetlights meet then current City standards.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
95.
The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
96.
Prior to issuance of building permits or the installation of street lighting on Highway 79 S,
which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit
the approved Edison streetlight improvement plans and pay the appropriate energy fees
related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD maintenance program.
OTHER AGENCIES
97.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated May 7, 2003, a copy of which is attached.
98.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated May 14, 2003, a copy of which is attached.
99.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated May 13, 2003, a copy of which is
attached.
R:\D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
60
100.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Miranda, Tomaras,
Ogas & Wengler, LLP, transmittal on behave of the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
dated May 23, 2003, a copy of which is attached.
101.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated August 4, 2003, a copy of which is
attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the properly shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Planning Commission approval.
Applicant's Signature
Name printed
Date
R:~D P~2003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional CenterVStaff report PC 8-20-03.doc
61
May 7, 2003
Thomas Thornsley, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY, PARCEL MAP NO. 30797
APN 959-0709001, APN 959-070-002, AND APN 959-070-003
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0233
[RANCHO PUEBLO MEDICAL CENTER]
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
:..therefore;: would.:be:: available-:upon ~eompletion ~of financial:: arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner and the construction of all required on-
site and/or off-site water facilities. RCWD will require the use of recycled water
for the landscaping of this project. All facilities required for this use will be
installed at the customer's expense.
This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium site with
individual building owners and a homeowners' association maintaining the
common property and private water and fire protection facilities. As a condition
of the project, RCWD requires that the City of Temecula include a Reciprocal
Easement and Maintenan?_~__Agreement for these on-site private water facilities.
In addition to this agreement, RCWD will require individual water meters for
each building if a condo conversion takes place;
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property
owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management fights, if
any, to RCWD. If you should have any questi6ns, please contact an Enghaeering
Services Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P E
Development Englneenng Manager
c: Andrew Webster, Planning A Capital Projects Managerial,
Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Bud Jones, Senior Engineering Technician
:, · : · i Rancho California Water District
}:~' .:::::. ',~,, ..... . .42135WirmhssterRoad · Post Offic~Boxg017 * Temecula, Calffornia92,589 9017 · (909) 2904900 · FAX(909) zg$-6860
Riverside Transit Agency
1825 333ird Street
P,O. Box 59968
Riverside, CA 92517-1968
Phone: (909) 565-5000
Fax: (909) 565-5001
May 14, 2003
Mr. Thomas Thornsley, Case Planner
Planning Dept.
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT: PA03-0233, Rancho Pueblo Professional Center - Approval by RTA
Dear Mr: Thornsley:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan for the proposed office and restaurant
complex at the northeasterly comer of State Highway 79 (South) and Avenida de Missiones. A
copy of the RTA staff review memo regarding the project is attached. No existing RTA bus
mutes presently serve the project site, however one or more routes are anticipated to serve this
portion of 79 in the relatively near future.
RTA is pleased approve the. design as submitted, with respect to transit issues. Indeed, the site
plan indicates some of the most attractive internal pedestrian circulation patterns and amenities
we have seen for a project in Riverside County and the developer should be recognized. RTA
would like to offer a friendly reminder to Temecula staff, however, that the project still requires
suitable transit ~ccess in the vicinity. That need should be met by our previous advisory m!ative
to a project west of Rancho Pueblo that requested a full-feature bus stop and bus turnout to be
installed on the north side of HighWay 79, west of the Avenida de Missiones intersection.
· If You need further clarification or I can' be of further assistance,'please call me at (909) 565-5164
or.contact me online at mmccoy~riversidetransit.com.
Sincerely,
F:\data\Planning~vlikek,~Word\Dev Review~'Femecula~2003\RTA Ltrhd - RanchoPuebloPro~Ctr.
Riverside Transit A~enc~
May 14, 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMO
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
To:
From:
Subject:
Anne Palatino, Director of Planning
Michael McCoy, Senior Planner ~
City of Temecula, Non-residential project: Rancho Pueblo Professional Center
Office, Medical, Restaurant and Other Uses - Case #PA03-0233
N side of State Highway 79(South), E'ly of Intersection with
Avenida de Missiones and proposed "Rancho Pueblo' Dr'
Bus route involved: Existing Route 24, potential additional routes.
Summary~ The applicant is proposing "Rancho Pueblo Professional Center", a 110,000 sq
interchange. The plans indicate two sit-down restaurants, 5 two-story office or medical
buildings and related infrastructure. Internal and perimeter vehicle and pedestrian
circulation patterns and amenities are excellent.
The nearest existing RTA bus service is with Route 24, at the intersection of SH79S and
Pechanga Parkway, one mile away. Addition,al bus service is anticipated for this portion
of SH79S in the future. Although RTA requests no bus-related infrastructure in connec-
tion with this project, the City will be reminded that a full-feature bus stop with turnout
and other amenities needs to be Installed on the north side of SH79S, just west of the
Aven de Missiones intersection, to serve the project vicinity.
INITIAL REVIEW INFORMATION - Review completed date: May 14, 2003.
Documents received at RTA: May 2, 2003;
Reply-by Date: May 15, 2003; Planning Commission Agenda Date: Unknown or N/A;
City Council/Bd of Supervisors Agenda Date: Unknown or N/A;
Thomas Guide Map pg and gdd; 979; D-2,3;
Case Number: PA03-0233;
Case Planner: Thomas Thomsley, (909) 694-6400;
Applicants: Malkoff & Associates of Villa Park, CA.
RTA PLANNING FOLLOW-UP:
Standard "Acceptable" letter to jurisdiction without comments
V/ Standard "Acceptable" letter to jurisdiction with compliments or positive advisories '
Letter with comments advising project modifications re transit issues
Verbal conversation with Case Planner and appropriate letter follow-up
Letter sent: Date: .51f[4/~I,
· · ~ .-F:~lata~Planning~vlikeM\Word~Dev Rev!ew~Temecula~2OO3~RanchoProfCtr.doc
File name: F:\data\Planning~/likeM~Word\Dev Review\Temecula~2003\RTA Ltrhd - RanchoPuebloProfCtr.doc
SECOND REVIEW:
Review materials placed in archive files: Date: ~'/14/~
/ I
.... ::'; .' "' -iF:\data~Planning~VlikeM~Word~Dev Review~Temecula~2003\RanchoProfCtr.doc .' · -, ·
TO:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: May 13, 2003
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Thomas Thomsley
FROM 6/'/ GREGOR DEIJF. NBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
RE: PLOT PLAN NO. PA03-0234
1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA03-0234 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
...... _...,_:.___:,.required: ............... . . : ............. ~---,-:- :. _ ....... . :: -.:_. ...... ........ .: ~ ..... ..... ...-.-
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (including vending machines) will be
submitted, including a fixture Schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to
ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific
reference, please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 461-0284).
c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
~ Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4.
~ Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3.
~} Emergency Response Plans Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2.)
~ Waste reduction management.
d) A letter from the Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
GD:gd
(909) 955-8980
NOTE:
CC:
Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building
Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health Clearance.
DougThompson, HazardousMaterials I[~ ~ ~ ~ ~~h/~Y 1 9 7003
Na~ 27 03 03:14p ; ; '~ p,2 ,
MIRANDA, TOMARAS, OGAS&WENGLER, LLP
10755-F Scripps PowayParkway #281
San Diego, CA 92131
(858) 554-0550
~_~. 200.,
May '~'' ~
Thomas Thornsley
Pro. iect Planner
City of Tcmccula
P.O. Box 9033
Tcmccula, CA 92589-9033
Submitted via Facsimile
:-:~-::_- .............~,E . _Comments ou Mitigation Monitoring Program tbr PA03-0233 (Rancho Pueblo
........ . .... i~;~-c~sio~:af-C~i~t~F) AlqiSpA:¢3-_~:,~Tr~inecfila:Supc~_Storage)' ........ ..... ........ .. :
Dear Mr. Thornsley.
We sobmil these comments and requested changes on behalf of the Pcchanga
Band of I,uiscfio Indians per your grant of an extension on thc deadline f'or commenting
on the above Projects. As such, we respectfully request that these comments be given
duc consideration as il' they were submitted prior to the commenting deadline, and that
they be iucorpnratcd as part of thc official CEQA record for the approval of this Projcct.
Tbe Pcchanga Band of l,uisefio Indians, a federally recognized Indian tribe aud sovereign
government, is formally requesting, pursuant to Public Resources Code §21092{b)(3}, to
be notified and involved in the CI';QA cnviromnental review process for thc duration o£
both tbe Rancho Pueblo Professional Center Pmiect and the Temceula Super Storage
Proicct,
TRIBAl, INTEI:~F, ST IN I'ROJECT
Pcchanga is not opposed, at this time, to the approval of this Project. I'echanga is
primarily concerned with the proposed and subsequent development of this area and its
impact ou Luiscfio cultural resources. The Pechanga/Luiscfio peuplc }lave called this area
home ~sincc time immemorial and can trace their ancestors to thc areas that will be
directly impacted by this Pr{liect. This land and its resoumes arc an integral part of thc
Tribe's present-day cultural values and, as such, the Tribe has an evident legal interest in
this Pm. jcct. Thc l'cchanga Tribal Government has a Cultural R.csourccs Department
with a stall'ol'cxpcrts in Lulsc~o history and archcnlogy, which are entrust, ed by their
elders to protect and preserve I,uisefio cnltural resoumes for future generations.
As such. the Pechanga Tribe is specifically concerned about thc protection of
Page I o1'4
· Ha~ ~-? 03 03:
uuique and 'rrcplaccablc cultural resources, such as l,uiscfio archcological sites and
cultnml resources w ~ ch may be displaced by ground-disturbing work on the Project;
and. above all, the proper and lawfi~l treatment of Native American remains and sacred
items flint may ~ discovered in the course o[thc build out of these I'mjects.
, ,' ..... been identified
It is important to note that although only one archeo ogmal s~lc has
. · ' ~, ' ' · I-5 mile
on bolh project propcrtics, there arc hterally dozens of recorded s~tcs w~th~n a
radius along the Temccula Creek, including sacred sites aud burial grounds which am
cuhurally affiliated with thc Pechanga Band. Thc Pechauga Band asserts that there is a
high likelihood that additional cultural resources and/or archeological sites exist sub-
suHhce on both Pro,eot properties, and will ~ uncovered during Phase 11 testing and the
grading tBr both Projects. As such, these resources and sites must be taken into account
and propcrly mitigated pursuant CEQA requirements.
REQUESTI~D AMENDMENTS TO curaun'r MITIGATION MEASURE~
mitigation measures XIV-7 through XIV-10 for ~tb Projects. Wc comment to simply
claril~ the wording of some of thc cultural ~sources mitigation language as potential
interpretation conilicts between measures could afi~ without such clarilication.
I ) Thc Applicaut's {Bridgeport Builders'} arcbcological msscssmcnt, through RMW
Paleu Associates, Inc. concludes that only one pre-historic site] CA-RIV 6499, exists on
either Prqiect site; and thrther concludes that this site is not deemed signiiicant under
CEQA- The pcmhanga Band asserts that it is premature Io conclude that this site is not
significant pursnant to CEQA until the Phase II studies arc competed. RMW states it is
possible that more o[this sttc exists subsurface, (b)ecaus the aailhcts found within thc
carrcnt project area bad been subj~ted to the back and foah movements of plowing and
discing lbr many yearn, it is unknown where the a~ilhcts originated. Thus, it is
recommended that this area be subicctcd to controlled destruction to determine fa su~
surlhcc ariilk~ctual dcposit is present." (RMW Rcpoa. July 2000. Page 10). As such. it is
possible that additional mitigation me~ures will need to be adopted, depending u~n the
results of thc Phase Il testing, to bring ~th Projects m comphancc w~th ( I~QA
Thcmlk~rc, thc Pcchanga Band requests thc [ollowing changes to m~t~gatmn measure
XIV-I to properly rcflcct the purposes of the Phase Il Testing:
X1V-1 Prior to thc issuance ora grading permit, Ph~c Il Testing with controllCdbe
destruction, using as small scraper to' remove thin lifts of soil From thc site, shall
Ocrlormcd to dctcmm~e d a sub-surt3cc agffact deposits are present Upon completion
this tcsting a cultural resource management repoa shall be prepared and liled with the
Calilbmia Historical Resource Information Center. The cultural resou[ce managcm?!
~shall include additional mitigation m~ures, if nccessau, lo bc incorporated mto
tim Mitigation Monilorine Plan, and shall be completed in consultation with thc Pechan~
Page 2 of 4
Ha~l 2'7 03 03:14p ~ >. p>4
2) Thc Pcchanga Band requests thc fi~llowing changes to mitigation measure XIV-6:
XIV-6 Il'any human remains arc encountered during iaitia! grading actlvitics, all gronnd
disturbing activities in Ihe vicinity of thc discovery will be terminated immediately and
lbe County Coroner's off'icc will be contacted to manage such remains. If such remains
are determined to be Native American, applicable Calilbmia State law will be Ibllowed
with regard to such remains, and. il' thc Pechanga Band is named thc M LD, applicable
provisions contained in thc Agreement required in mitigation measure XIV-7 will also be
Ibllowcd.
3) Thc I'cchanga Band requests that all cultural resources that am lbund during the
m-cheological tcstiag and grading for these Projects be repalriated to thc Pcchanga Band
Ibr cumtion. The Tribe understands that the archaeologist may have to retain certain
- items, excluding .sacred items and burial items, for documentati,.o..n, and reporting purposes
'::'z::':~: :_-: .......... ~br-a-sbort period.of tin_le, b3g requests that the landowner/applicant relinquish all
agreement with thc above request, wc call for mitigation measure XIV-3 to be amended
as such:
XIV-3 If any cultural resources arc cxposcd during initial grading and ground
disturbance activities, the City will be contacted and a qualified archaeologist will
evaluate tile resources in consultation with the Pechanga Band ......................
...... : ..... ,,-- Thc owncrship of all cultural resources will be relinquished by the
landowncr/Prnicct owneddcveloper in favor of the Pechanga Band.
4) Thc Pcchanga Band requests thc following changes to mitigation measure XIV-7:
XIV-7 Prior to the issue of a grading permit, the Project owner/developer.. . shall enter into
· · ' · Pechanga Band that .................
an agreement with the .... ~'~ ....... ,,.~ ~ ....... :"arA all "'" ...... '
,i..., ..... ~..~: ..... ,...~ ........... ,, ..c,~... ~...n.J ,..,, ..r,,... P~t. This agreement
shall contain thc Ibllowing requirements: I ) A provision stating that all cuhuml ~sources
~bund during archcological testing and the build out of the Project will be Riven to the
Pcchanga Band; 2) A provision allowing Pechanga tribal monitors to be present duri.g
all archeological testing and grading activities associated with the build oul of this Project
to ~ compensated by thc Prolcct owner/devclo~r, .Q Provisions concerning thc
treatment nfalJ cultnral ~soumcs, includ ng Native American remains that may be
discovered on the Project site during build out.
Thc I~cchanga l?,and appreciates thc npportunity to provide comments on these
Projects. Working tugcther, on a government-to-government basis with the Pechanga
Band, thc City of Temccula can preserve and protect the invaluable Lu'sefio resources
Page 3 of 4
Ha~ 2"7 03"03~-i4p
within thc City for thc bcncfit of entire community.
S ~ccrcIy,
I.aura Y. ~iranda
Attorneys for thc Pechanga Tribe
1.1 .P
ce:
Bridgeport Buildcrs
SWCA I£nvironmental Consultants
Page 4 of 4
WARREN D. WILLIAMS~
General Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
August 4, 2003
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: Thomas Thornsley
1995 MARKET STREET
--RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909.955.1200
909.788.9965 FAX
83612A
0 7 7003
By
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: PA 03:0233
The District does not usually review land divisions/land use cases or provide State Division
-:el. RealEstate letters/flood hazard reports-for-projects-that are-located within-'incorporated ....
Cities. Exceptions are made for cases with items of specific interest to the District including
District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood Control and drainage facilities
which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and
District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). The District has not
reviewed the proposed project in detail and the. following comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to
flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issues.
PA03-0233 is a proposal to design, construct and operate a mixed use professional center
on a 10.98 acre site located in the city of Temecula.
The entire site is located within the unshaded Zone X boundary as delineated on Panel No.
0607420010B of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in conjunction with the National
Flood Insurance Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA).
The following information of a general nature is provided herewith for your use:
This project may need to obtain an applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit coverage from the State Water Resources Control Board or the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) - San Diego Region.
Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be
exempt.
If the mapped flood plain is impacted by the project, the City should require the applicant
to obtain a Section 1601/1803 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and
Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is
exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality
83612.1
City of Temecula
Re: PA 03-0233
-2-
August 4, 2003
· Certification may be required from the RWQCB - San Diego Region prior to issuance of
the Corps 404 Permit.
· If an. atural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should
reqmre the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California
Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the
project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water
Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality
Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Teresa
Tung at 909.955.4050.
Very truly yours,
STEPHEN C. THOMAS
Senior Civil Engineer
TT:slj
ATrACHMENT NO. 4
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
PA03-0234
R:~D P~003\03~0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20~03.doc
62
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE Cl'rY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA03-0234 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR THE OPERATION, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF
A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY CONSISTING OF A 1-STORY 1,307
SQUARE FOOT OFFICE, THREE 1-STORY STORAGE BUILDINGS
AND TWO 2-STORY STORAGE BUILDINGS FOR A COMBINED
TOTAL OF 108,844 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, EAST OF AVENIDA DE
MlSSlONES, AND THE FUTURE RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO'S. 959-070-001 AND 002.
WHEREAS, Ingrid Campbell with WLC Architects filed Planning Application No. PA03-0234,
in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA03-0234 was processed including, but not limited to
public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA03-0234 on
August 20, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA03-0234;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 2. Findinqs - Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission, in approving
Planning Application No. PA03-0234 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.04.010E of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the
Development Code.
The proposed self-storage use is consistent with the underlying General Plan land use
designation of Professional Office and the Z-1 Overlay, the applicable sections of the
Planned Development Overlay-6 (PDOo6), the Development Code, and the Municipal Code.
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
The proposed self-storage uses design element required in the City of Temecula General
P/an. As proposed and conditioned, this project is consistent with the City of Temecula
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
63
General Plan and the applicable sections of PDO-6, the Development Code, and the
Municipal Code.
C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and
other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning
Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
The proposed self-storage use provides a significant landscape buffer along the front and
rear (25 and 20 feet respectfully) property lines, provides accented and articulated walls for
screening, and provide sufficient parking and loading in compliance with the standard
adopted in PDO-6 zoning requirements and the City's Development Code for integration into
the surrounding commercial developments.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety,
and welfare of the community.
Provisions are made in the General Plan, PDO-6, and the Development Code to ensure that
the public health, safety, and welfare are safeguarded with the operation and design of
storage facilities. The project is consistent with these documents and will be conditioned to
meet all applicable requirements.
E. The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use permit is based on
substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City
Council.
The project has been completely reviewed, as a whole, in reference to all applicable codes
and ordinances before the Planning Commission.
Section 3. Findinqs - Development Plan. The Planning Commission, in approving
Planning Application No. 02-0512 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
F. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Professional Office (PO) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for the Planned Development Overlay-6 (PDO-6) and the City of
TemeculaDevelopmentCode. Thesiteisthereforeproperlyplannedandzonedandfound
to be physically suitable for commercial retail and restaurant uses.
G. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The architecture proposed for the projects is consistent with the Architectural requirements
as stated in Planned Development Overlay-6 (PDO-6) and Design Guidelines and the
Commercial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The project has been
reviewed for, and as conditioned, is found to be consistent with, all applicable policies,
guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be
constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
R:~D P~2003V33-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center\Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
64
Section4. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Determination for Planning
Application No. 03-0234 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section
15162. This section applies when a Negative Declaration has been adopted for a project, no
subsequent studies shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not
discussed or examined in the Environment Initial Study.
Section 5. Conditional Use Permit Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning
Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA03-0234, a Conditional Use
Permit to operation a self-storage facility consisting of a 1-story 1,307 square foot office, three 1-
story storage buildings and two 2-story storage buildings for a total of 108,844 square feet, east of
Avenida de Missiones, and the future Rancho Pueblo Road, known as Assessor Parcel No.'s 959-
070-001 and -002. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibits A.
Section 6. Development Plan Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning
Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA03-0234, a Development
Plan to design and construct a self-storage facility consisting of a 1 -story 1,307 square foot office,
three 1-story storage buildings and two 2-story storage buildings for a total of 108,844 square feet,
east of Avenida de Missiones, and the future Rancho Pueblo Road, known as Assessor Pamel No.'s
959-070-001 and -002. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibits B.
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 20th day of August 2003.
ATTEST:
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
{SEAL}
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003-. was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of August 2003, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03,doc
65
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA03-0234 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
R:~D P~003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
66
EXHIBIT A
CITY OFTEMECULA
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA03-0234 (Conditional Use Permit)
Project Description:
A Development Plan for the design and construction and
a Conditional Use Permit to operation a self-storage
facility consisting of a 1-story 1,307 square foot office,
three 1-story buildings and two 2-story buildings for a
total of 108,844 square feet, east of Avenida de
Missiones, and the future Rancho Pueblo Road.
DIF Category:
Service Commercial
Assessor Parcel No.:
959-070-001 and 002
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
August 20, 2003
August 20, 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption
as provided under Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of
Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer
has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for
the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code
Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
R:~D P~003~3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff reporl PC 8-20-03.doc
67
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA03-
0234 (Development Plan) and PA02-0512 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 30797), unless
superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions shall be complied with
prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit.
The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application
No. PA01-0522 (PDO-6).
The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated April 23, 2003, on file
with the Community Development Department - Planning Division, unless superceded by
these conditions of approval.
This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this Conditional Use Permit.
Customer access to the site will be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. seven days
a week
Any business activity, other than rental of storage units, including the on-site sale of
merohandize or garage sales, and transfer/storage businesses, which utilize vehicles as part
of the business is prohibited. No servicing or repair of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn
mowers, or any similar equipment is permitted.
10.
Storage units shall not be used for the storage of flammable liquids, highly combustible or
explosive materials, or hazardous chemicals.
11.
Truck or vehicle rental is prohibited without obtaining all necessary approvals subject to the
Development Code Schedule of Permitted Uses.
14.
The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department
inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above-
mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Name printed
Date
R:'~D P~003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center.taft report PC 8-20-03.doc
68
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA03-0234 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
R:~D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
69
EXHIBIT B
CITY OFTEMECULA
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA03-0234 (Development Plan)
Project Description:
A Development Plan for the design and construction and
a Conditional Use Permit to operation a self-storage
facility consisting of a 1-story 1,307 square foot office,
three 1-story buildings and two 2-story buildings for a
total of 108,844 square feet, east of Avenida de
Missiones, and the future Rancho Pueblo Road.
DIF Category:
Service Commercial
Assessor Parcel No.:
959-070-001 and 002
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
August 20, 2003
August 20, 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption
as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of
Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer
has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for
the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code
Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
R:~D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
70
10.
11.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA02-
0512 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 30797), unless superseded by these conditions of approval.
All these conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
conditional use permit.
The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application
No. PA01-0522 (PDO-6).
If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or
any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or
archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the
City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the
affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may
require the properly to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the
City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at
no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find.
Upon determining that the determination is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the
Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize
the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural
resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation
or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have
been approved by the Director of Planning.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "A"
(Site Plan) under PA03-0234, contained on file with the Planning Department. Additionally,
the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall not be placed in prominent locations
visible to the public. This equipment shall be screened from view.
Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical
plans for verification of proper placement of the transformer and the double detector check
prior to final agreement with the utility companies. If these devices cannot be place out of
public view, in prominent locations, they must be installed underground when possible.
Parking lot lights shall be of a type consistent with the standards defined in PDO-6. The site
lighting plan shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to installation.
Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Details of these lights shall be submitted to
the Planning Department dudng plan check for review prior to installation. The installation of
wall pack style light shall not be used.
R:~D P~?.003\03q3233 Rancho Pueblo Professionat Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
71
12.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits "B~I, B-2 and B-3"
(Building Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department -
Planning. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
13.
All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were
designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined to be
necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet will be raised to provide for this
screening.
14.
The Landscaping Plan shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "C" (Landscape
Plan) under PA03-0233, contained on file with the Community Development Department-
Planning.
15.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
16.
The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board contained on file with
the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall
require approval of the Director of Planning.
Material
Windows, doors
Wall face
Wall base
Wall cornices
Trellises
Finish & Color
Bronze storefront - bronze glazing
Stucco-Sorrento #225 - beige
Split Face Veneer - Coral Reef & Stucco-Benavento #224 - light brown
Stucco-Peach Cream #50 - off-white
Douglas Fir - Cai Rustic Stain
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
17.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
18.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
19.
The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F and G", (Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan,
Color and Material Board) to reflect the final Conditions of Approval and submit five (5) full
size copies prior to the submittal of any plans for plan check.
20.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the
colored version of approved Exhibit "H", the colored architectural elevations to the Planning
Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall
be readable on the photographic prints.
R:\D P~2003~3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff repor~ PC 8-20-03.doc
72
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
21. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
22. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
23.
An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
24.
The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be
painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely
as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
25.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Exhibit "C" under PA03-0233, or as amended by these conditions. The location,
number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identifythe total square
footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
Prior to Release of Power
26.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
27.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from
final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have
been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be
released upon request by the applicant.
R:'~D P~003~3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
73
28.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by22 inches, clearly and conspicuouslystating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
29.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
30.
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
General Requirements
31.
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
32.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
33.
All on-site drainage facilities shall be maintained by a private maintenance association or
property owner.
34.
The vehicular movement for Highway 79 South at the easterly access to the site shall be
restricted to a right in/right out movement subject to approval by Caltrans. The method of
controlling this movement shall be approved by the Director of Public Works.
35.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
R:~D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Puebro Professional CenterVStaff report PC 8-20-03.doc
74
Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights,
Storm drain facilities
Sewer and domestic water systems
Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
36.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved bythe Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
37.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
38.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
39.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
40.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
41.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
42.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
R:~D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
75
43.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
44.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
45.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
46. Prior to the first building permit, a Parcel Map No. 30797 shall be recorded, unless otherwise
approved by the Director of Public Works.
47.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
48.
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401 and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
The Developer shall design the following improvements to meet City public road standards
and remain privately maintained until a connection is made to a publicly maintained road to
the east. The following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets as
shown on the site plan:
49.
a. Rancho Pueblo Road (66' R.NV) to include the installation of street improvements,
paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property
to the west.
50.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
51.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
R:~D P~003~03~0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
76
52.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
53.
The Developer shall pay a mitigation fee in an amount acceptable to the Department of
Public Works. Said fee shall reflect the percentage of impact at each intersection and shall
be in accordance to the traffic impact analysis dated May 17, 2002.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
54.
Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy in Parcel Map No. 30797,
a. The traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Rancho Pueblo Road
shall be installed and operational.
b. Rancho Pueblo Road shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans.
c. Street "A" shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans
55.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
56.
All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per the
approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
57.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT
58.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
59.
The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on
March 31,2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee
schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
60.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
R:",D P',2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
77
61. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
62. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
63.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
64.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
65. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
66.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
67.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
68.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
69.
Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
70.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
71.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
72. Show all building setbacks.
73.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
FIRE DEPARTMENT
74.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in
force at the time of building, plan submittal.
75.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2125 GPM at
R:',D P~O03't03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
78
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2975 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
76.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access read(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
77.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
extedor of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
78.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection pdor
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
79.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
ara installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
80.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
81.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
82.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
83.
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved bythe Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
84.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants
shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible
R:'~D P~003~3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center~taff report PC 8-20-03.doc
79
building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National
Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
85.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
86.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or read fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers' on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
87.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on, square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
88.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
89.
Prior to th, e issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (8) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door of the office. (CFC 902.4)
90.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
91.
Prior to fihal inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
92. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
93.
Prior to bdilding permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and
to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life '
safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C.
R:",D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
80
94.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
95.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
96.
The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file et the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
General Conditions
97.
The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
98.
While Rancho Pueblo and Street "A" are private streets, the property owner or business
association will be responsible for the energy/maintenance costs of the streetlights. Once
Rancho Pueblo and Street "A" are accepted as public streets, the City will consider
assuming the energy and maintenance costs if streetlights meet then current City standards.
99.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
100. All parkways including areas within the ROW, fencing, on site lighting and landscaping shall
be maintained by the property owner or an established maintenance association.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
101. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
OTHER AGENCIES
102. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Temecula Police
Department transmittal dated May 5, 2003, a copy of which is attached.
103. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated May 7, 2003, a copy of which is attached.
104.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated August 4, 2003, a copy of which is
attached.
R:~D P~2003~03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center,Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
81
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval, I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Planning Commission approval.
Applicant's Signature
Name printed
Date
R:\D P~003\03-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03,doc
82
May 7, 2003
Thomas Thomsley, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
A PORTION OF LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 15211
APN 959-070-001, APN 959-070-002, AND APN 959-070-003
PLANr~ING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0234
[TEMECULA SUPER STORAGE]
Dear Mr. Thomsley:
-::::::Please be..:advt~ed-::that :the ab~vezrtfe~enced 'PrtpErfy:iS-:10dhted~...with~-:~e
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner and the construction of all required.on-site and/or
off-site water facilities.
RCWD will require, the use of recycled water for the landscaping of this project.
All facilities required for this use will be installed at the customer's expense.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and
requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you should have any questions, please. ¢tntaet an'Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
03~SB:atl 15~F012-T6~FCF
Andrew Webster, Planning & Capital Projects Manager
Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Bud Jones, Senior Engineering Technician
0 $ 2003
CITY OF TEMECULA
POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION & PLANS UNIT
27540 Ynez Road, Suite J-9, Temecula, CA 92591
(909) 506-2626 Fax: (909) 506-2838
Date: May 5, 2003
Case Name:
Temecula Super Storage
Case Number:
PA03-0234
Owner:
Bridgeport Builders
1954 Placentia Avenue, Suite 210
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
Proposal: -- A self.storage-facility consisting of a 1-story-l.,307 square foot office,_three
1 -story buildings and two 2-story buildings for a total of 109,177 square
feet
Case Planner:
Thomas Thornsley
The following comments pertains to Officer Safety, Public Safety and Crime Prevention
measures [egarding this planning project transmittal.
1. LANDSCAPING: Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at
a height of no more than three feet (3') or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants, hedges
and shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the
building utilizing lower level windows.
(a) Applicant should ensure all trees surrounding all building roof tops be kept at a
distance so as to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Trees also act as a
natural ladder. Prune tree branches with at least a 6 feet clearance from building.
(b) Any burms should not exceed 3' in height.
(c) The placement of all landscaping should comply with guidelines from Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED).
2. LIGHTING: All exterior lighting surrounding the buildings should be energy-saving and
minimized after closing houm of business to comply with the State of California Lighting
Ordinance. Furthermore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting
Requirements.
(a) All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above. The
doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one (1) foot candle of light at ground level,
evenly dispersed.
3, HARDWARE: All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous
hardware shall be commercial or institution grade.
4. GRAFFITI: Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings shall be removed or painted
over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Notify the Temecula Police Department
immediately so a report can be taken.
5. ALARM SYSTEM: Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored
alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to
notify the police department immediately of any intrusion. All multi-tenant office/warehouse
located within the building should have their own alarm system.
6. ROOF HATCHES: All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
7. PUBLIC TELEPHONES: Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings
should be placed in a well-lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature
to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of
the buildings.
.......... 8~-Marked-Parkin,q for Disabled-Vehicles: .All disabled parking~stalls on the premises shall-be .......
marked in accordance with section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
9. Police Entry Code: Prior to opening, applicant will provide the Temecula Police Department
with a 24-hour emergency code. Code will require a keypad to be positioned on both the entry
and exit point of the facility. Keypads could be the same pad as that used by regular customem.
Police Department will be notified in advanced if the code is to be changed. Point of contact at
the Police Department is Officer Lynn Fanene Sr. at (909) 506-2626 or contact the Police Target
Storefmnt office at 27540 Ynez Road, Suite J-9, Temecula, CA 92591. Verifications for all
gated facilities within the City limits are checked and verified on a monthly basis by the gate
code custodian.
10. Emer,qenc¥ Point of Contact: If no on-site manager resides on the premises, applicant
will provide the police department with a 24-hour contact name and telephone number in case of
an emergency at the facility.
11. CRIME PREVENTION:
(a)
All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their
booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association 1127-
11 ~ Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal Code 490.5
affords memhants the opportunity to recover their losses through a civil demand
program.
(b) Business desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the crime
prevention unit of the Temecula Police Department.
(c)
Employee training regarding retail theft, credit card prevention, citizen's arrest
procedures, personal safety or any other related crime prevention training procedures
are also available through the crime prevention unit.
(d)
The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in
the "lnkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less than $40.00 for inkless inkpads,
retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for
services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of the business-advising
customers of the "lnkless Ink program in use". If the business becomes a victim of
check fraud, the police department will be able to track the suspect with the
thumbprint.
Any questions regarding these comments shall be referred to the Temecula Police Department
Crime Prevention and Plans Officer at (909) 506-2626.
Lynn N. Fanene, Sr.
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
General Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
August 4, 2003
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909.955.1200
909.788.9965 FAX
83607.1
Attention: Thomas Thomsley
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: PA03-0234
The'Distrietdoes Not usually-r-egiew land' diVisiong/l~/h-d use cas6g-6i: provid~ Sfate-Di¥i~i0fi 6f Real
Estate letters/flood hazard reports for projects that are located within incorporated Cities. Exceptions
are made for cases with items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage
Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities xvhich could be considered a logical
component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development
mitigation, fees). The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following
comments do n. ot in any way consfitu3e or imply Dislric~ approyal or endorsement of the proposed
project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issues.
PA03-0234 is a proposal to design, construct and operate a self-storage facility on a 3.92 acre site
located in the city of Temecula.
The entire site is located within the unshaded Zone X boundary as delineated on Panel No.
0607420010B of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in conjunction with the National Flood
Insurance Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEIMA).
The following information of a general nature is provided herewith for your use:
This project may need to obtain an applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit coverage from the State Water Resources Control Board or the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) - San Diego Region. Clearance for grading,
recordation, or other rural approval should not be given until the City has determined that the
project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
· If the mapped flood plain is impacted by the project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department offish and Game and a
Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the u.$, Army Corps of Engineers, or written
.., cgrre~pgndence ff0m ~ese agencies indic/iting the.project is exempt from these requirements.
. ::A.Clean Water Act Section 401' Water Quality Certification may be required from the RWQCB
Z San Diego Region Prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit.
City of Temecula - 2 -
Re: PA03-0234
83607.1
August 4, 2003
If a natural watemourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should
require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department
of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from
these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be
required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of
the Corps 404 permit.
Should you have any questions regarding tiffs matter, please feel free to contact Teresa Tung at
909.955.4050.
Very truly yours,
STEPHEN C. THOMAS
Senior Civil Engineer
TT:bjp
A'rrACHMENT NO. 5
NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE LETrERS
R:",D P~003~3-0233 Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, Staff report PC 8-20-03.doc
83
July 15th, 2003
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:
I am a resident of the Los Ranchitos Community and legal owner of Lot number 32 located at
30851 De Portola Road. I have met with a representative of Bridgeport Builders and reviewed the
Tentative Parcel map and architectural drawings showing plans for a self-storage facility, to be
located near the southerly border of my property. I have previously viewed architectural plans for
the Rancho community Church and Schools Project and it is my understanding that this project
will have the same or similar architectural and landscape style, as the church project.
Based upon the information, which I have at this time, I submit the following comments
regarding the proposed development:
~lam in favor of the project as proposed. '
ff I am in favor of the plan as proposed with the followin~comments;
a I am opposed to the plan as pro~sed for the following reason:
Sincerely,
Herman and Nieeee Thorne
30851 De Portola Rd
Temecula, California
Phone Number
July 15th, 2003
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:
I am a resident of the Los Ranchitos Community and legal owner of Lot number 33 located at
30787 De Ponola Road. I have met with a representative of Bridgeport Builders and reviewed the
Tentative Parcel map and architectural drawings showing plans for a self-storage facility, to be
located near the southerly border of my property. I have previously viewed architectural plans for
the Rancho community Church and Schools Project and it is my understanding that this project
will have the same or similar architectural and landscape style, as the church project.
Based upon the information, which I have at this time, I submit the following comments
regarding the proposed development:
a I am in favor of the project as proposed.
1~ I am in favor of the plan as proposed with the following comments:
n I am opposed to the plan as proposed for the following reasons:
Josh Minturr
30787 De I
Temecula, j alifornia .
Pl~one ~'mber
E-Mail Correspondance
July 31, 2002
To Joanne Rodriguez
City of Temecula Planning Commission
Re: Rancho Community Church And Schools Project
Hi Joanne.
Thank you for sending me the information
about the proposed mini storage adjacent to my
property in Los Ranchitos. I would definitly support a
mini storage facility with a buffer wall and
landscaping to a bowling alley. I feel that a bowling
alley would severely compromise the Los Ranchitos
area. I also believe the church facility should create
a good buffer zone and a wall. The church and other
proposed businesses should also add to the horse
trails by contributing property to it, just as the
homeowners have. Their contribution to the horse
trails and buffer area would add to the beauty of Los
Ranchitos and be a positive commitment on their part,
rather then just trying to reduce their negative
impact on Los Ranchitos. I also believe that sports
field lighting would have a negative impact on our
area and I do oppose it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Joseph R Errico
8429 E. 81~ St.
Tulsa, OK 74~33
(918) 294-0644
March 27, 2002
Mayor and City Council
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Dr/ye
Temecula, California 92589
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:
] am a resident of the Los Ranchitos Community and legal owner of lot number 32 located al
30851 De Portola Rd. I have met with a representative of Bridgeport Builders and reviewed the
Tentative Parcel Map showing the preliminary plans for parcel I, 2, and a portion of parcel 3 of
tract 1521 I. This map includes plans for a 220-unit senior residential community, a 60-unit
assisted living facility, a 41,000 square foot medical building, and an a self-storage facility. I have
previously reviewed architectural plans for the Rancho Community Church and Schools Project
and it is my understanding that this project will have the same or similar architectural and
landscape style as the ehureh project.
Based upon the information I have at this time, I submit the following comments regarding the
proposed development:
~Iam in favor of the plan as proposed
approve of the plan as proposed with the following comments:
C: I am opposed to the plan as pr~l..for the following reasons:
Herman'.OViecee Thorne
Phone number
10
March 27, 2002
Mayor and City Council
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:
I am a resident of the Los Ranchitos Community and legal owner of lot number 31 located at
30895 De Portola Rd. I have met with a representative of Bridgeport Builders and reviewed the
Tentative Parcel Map showing the preliminary plans for parcel 1, 2, and a portion of parcel 3 of
tract 15211. This map includes plans for a 220-unit senior residential community, a 60-unit
assisted living facility, a 41,000 square foot medical building, and an a self-storage facility. I have
previously reviewed architectural plans for the Rancho Community Church and Schools Project
and it is my understanding that this project will have the same or similar architectural and
landscape style as the church proj~t.
Based upon the information I have at this time, I submit the following comments regarding the
proposed development:
~ I am in favor of the plan as proposed
approve of the plan as proposed with the following comments:
r~ I am opposed to the plan as proposed for the following reasons:
Merle Capen
PO Box 1025
Ternecula, California 92593
$o ?--
Phone number
9
April 2'~ , 2002
Mayor and City Council
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Califomia 92589
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:
i am a res/dent of the Los Ranchitos Community and legal owner of lot number 34 located at
30753 De Portola Rd. 1 have met with a representative of BHdgeport Builders and reviewed the
Tentative Parcel Map showing the preliminary plans for parcel I, 2, and a port/on of parcel 3 of
~ract 1521 I. This map includes plans for a 220-unit senior residential community, a 60-unit
assisted living facility, a 41,000 square foot medical building, and an a self-storage facility. I have
previously reviewed architectural plans for the Rancho Community Church and Schools Project
and it is my understanding that this project will have the same or similar arohitectural and
landscape style as the church project.
. Based upon the information I have at this time, I submit the following comments regarding the
proposed development:
~ I am in favor of the plan as proposed
~f~I approve of the plan as proposed with the following comments-
r~ I am opposed to the plan as proposed for the following reasons:
Phone number
10