Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout010704 PC Agenda II In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35. t 04 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JANUARY 7, 2004 - 6:00 P.M. ........ Next In Order: Resolution: No. 2004-001 CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: RollCall: Commissioner Mathewson Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio and Chiniaeff PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary QtlQr to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific Items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of January 7, 2003 R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2004\O 1-o7-()4.doc 2 Director's Hearina Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for December 2003 COMMISSION BUSINESS Elect new Chairperson Continued from December 17, 2003 3 Plannina Application No. PA03-0733 Maraarita Medical Plaza Sian Proaram a reauest to approve a revised Sian Proaram to allow second stOry sianaae and revise the provisions of the approved Sian Proaram located on the southeast corner of Maraarita Road and North General Kearnev Road. Saied Naaseh PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard In support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects In court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or In written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Continued from December 17, 2003 4 Plannina Application No. PA03-0347 submitted bv Griffin Communities. a product review for 100 detached sinale family residences within Plannina Area 4A of the Roripauah Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Sprinas Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Staae Road IAPN: 957-340-001\. Dan Lona. Associate Planner New Items 5 Plannina Application No. PA03-0176 a Development Plan to construct. operate and establish a 17.505 SQuare foot commercial two-stOry buildina on 1.15 acres located at 41720 Winchester Road. Rick Rush. Associate Planner 6 Plannina Application No. PA03-0525 à Minor Conditional Use Permit to establish 1.655 SQuare foot wind tastina and retail establishment in an existina commercial buildina located at 27493 Ynez Road. Dan Lona. Associate Planner R: \P LAN co M MlAg end as \2004\0 1-07-04. doc COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS PLANNiNG DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: January 21, 2004 Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 ,;. R:\PlANCOMMlAgendas\2004\0 1-07 -o4.doc ITEM #2 . . CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: January 7,2004 SUBJECT: Director's Hearing Case Update Planning Director's Agenda items for December 2003 PA03-0388 December 18, 2003 PA03-0518 A Product Review for 130 detached single- family residential homes with four different floor plans and three architectural designs in the Avondale Tract VTM 26828 located on the northeast corner of Seraphina Road and Rita Way A Minor Conditional Use Permit to operate a church in an existing building A Tentative Parcel Map for condominium purposes to establish a total of twenty-four (24) light industrial condominium units on two existing lost totaling 8.91 acres within the Remington Business Center Attachments: 1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 2 p, \P LAN N IN GID IRH EAR \MEM 0\2003 \ 12-2003 ,doc Safe Harbor Christian Fellowship KREC III, LLC of Approved Approved p, IPLANNIN GID IRHEAR \MEM 0\2003\ 12 - 2003 . doc ATTACHMENT NO.1 ACTION AGENDAS . . . AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2003 1 :30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1: Project No: Project Title: Applicant: Location: Proposal: PA03-0490 Avondale Richmond American Homes of California, Inc. Northwest corner of Seraphina Road and Rita Way A Product Review for 130 detached single-family residential homes with four different floor plans and three architectural designs in the Avondale Tract VTM 26828 located on the northwest corner of Seraphina Road and Rita Way. Determination of Consistency with a project for which a Negative Declaration was previously adopted. Rick Rush Approval APPROVED Environmental Action: Case Planner: Recommendation: ACTION: P,\PIANNINGIDIRHEAR\Agendas\2003\12-04-03 ACTION AGENDA.doc 1 . . . AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 11,20031:30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1: Project No: Project Title: Applicant: Location: Proposal: PA03-0388 Safe Harbor Fellowship Safe Harbor Christian Fellowship, Keith Maxcy 42372 Rio Nedo (APN: 909-253-018) A Minor Conditional Use Permit to operate a church in an existing building Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Section 15301 (existing facilities) Dan Long Approval APPROVED Environmental Action: Case Planner: Recommendation: ACTION: P,IPLANNINGlDIRHEARlAgendas\2003\l2-11-O3 ACTION AGENOA.doc 1 . . . ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 18, 20031 :30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1: Project Number: Project Title: Applicant: Location: PA03-0518 Remington Tentative Parcel Map KREC III, LLC Located on the south side of Remington Avenue approximately 900 feet west of Diaz Road. A Tentative Parcel Map for condominium purposes to establish a total of twenty-four (24) light industrial condominium units on two existing lots totaling 8.91 acres within the Remington Business Center. Exempt 909-370-012 & 909-370-016 Stuart Fisk Approval APPROVED Proposal: Environmental Action: APN: Project Planner: Recommendation: ACTION: P,IPLANNINGIDIRHEARlAgendas\2003\12-18-O3 ACTION AGENDAdoc I ITEM #3 . . . CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Planning Commission Saied Naaseh, Senior Planner DATE: SUBJECT: January 7,2004 Promenade Medical Center, PA03-0733, Revised Sign Program APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Medical Real Estate Development, LLC LOCATION: Southeast corner of Margarita Road and North General Kearney Road PROPOSAL: A request to approve a revised Sign Program to allow second story signage and revise the provisions of the approved Sign Program. BACKGROUND On December 17, 2003, the Planning Commission provided direction to staff and the applicant to prepare a revised sign program that allows tasteful second story signage in exchange for removing and improving all first story signage on all of the medical buildings on the site. The Planning Commission appointed Chairman Chiniaeff to assist staff and the applicant in this matter. On December 18, 2003, the applicant, staff and Chairman Chiniaeff came to an agreement on the details of the signs along Margarita Road. In addition, the applicant agreed to talk to the doctors whose signage will be removed and replaced with new signage. On December 29, 2003, the applicant informed staff that he has received agreement from all the doctors to remove all first story signage for the entire site and replace them with new signs. The proposed signs, submitted to staff on December 30, 2003, will be directly mounted on the building as opposed to the existing signage, which is mounted on exposed raceways. This mounting method will greatly enhance the aesthetics of the signs and the buildings. All signs along Margarita will be black individual channel letters with halo lighting with a maximum letter height of 14". These signs will be a smaller version of the D&D signs in the Overland Corporate Center. ANALYSIS The proposed signs are consistent with the direction staff received from the Commission on December 17, 2003 with the exception of the size of one of the second story signs for Advanced Orthopedic Surgery Center. This sign is proposed at 26.3 square feet and the Development Code only permits 18 square feet for this suite. Therefore, staff is recommending the applicant revise this sign to be approximately 18 square feet as the suite has approximately 36' of R:\Signs\2002\O2-0095 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlPC Slaf1 Report 1-7-04.doc 1 frontage. The revised sign program will be submitted to staff and the Planning Commission at the hearing that will include the following provisions: The tower signs will be deleted, Different types of signs will be permitted along the Margarita and parking lot frontages, . The permitted signs will be a maximum of Y2 square feet for every one lineal foot of building frontage for all second story signs with a maximum of 50 square feet per sign, The permitted signs will be a maximum of 1 square feet for every one lineal foot of building frontage for all first story signs with a maximum of 50 square feet per sign, Exposed raceways will not be utilized. The Development Code permits approval of a Sign Program for a project if the Sign Program complies with all the regulations of the Development Code, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and height. However, the Development Code also requires that to the extent the Sign Program standards differ from the Development Code, the Sign Program also should propose to enhance the development to more fully accomplish the objectives of the Sign standards in the Development Code. In staff's opinion, the removal and replacement of the existing signage with halo lighted signs will greatly enhance the existing building and justifies the proposed second story signage. FINDINGS (17.28.080.8) 1. The proposed signs enhance the development by removing the existing signage and replacing them with more astatically pleasing signage, and are in harmony with, and visually related to: a. All of the signs included in the sign program as several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors, illumination, sign type, or sign shape have been incorporated into the Sign Program; The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or design motifs included in the building being identified as the sign compliment the design of the building; and, Surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring adjacent approved signs as the surrounding area facing the illuminated signs is commercially zoned. b. c. 2. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants as the standards in the Sign Program apply to all future tenants; and, 3. The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of this Chapter, in that the sign program complies with all the regulations of this Chapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and height. Further, to the extent the sign program does not comply with the requirements of this Chapter as to sign area, number, location, and height, the proposed sign program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the objectives of this Chapter as The proposed sign program preserves and improves the appearance of the City as viewed from Margarita Road as is proposing signage that compliments and enhances the building. R:\Signs\2002\O2-o095 Margarita Medical Sign Program\PC Staff Report 1-7-o4.doc 2 . . . . . . RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0733, TO REVISE AN APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PROMENADE MEDICAL CENTER LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND NORTH GENERLA KEARNEY ROAD ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 921-090-087. Attachments: 1. PC Resolution 2004-- - Blue Page 4 2. Proposed Signs - Blue Page 10 3. December 17, 2003 Staff Report - Blue Page 11 R:\Signs\2002\O2-o095 Margarita Medical Sign Program\PC Staff Report 1.7-04.doc 3 ATTACHMENT 1 PC RESOLUTION 2004- - R:\Slgns\20D2\02-o095 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlPC Staff Report 1-7-o4.doc 4 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0733 TO REVISE AN APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PROMENADE MEDICAL CENTER LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 921-090-087. WHEREAS, Medical Real Estate Development, LLC, filed Planning Application No. PA03-0733 Sign Program Revision "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 17, 2003 and January 7,2004 at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.28.080.B of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed signs enhance the development by removing the existing signage and replacing them with more aesthetically pleasing signage, and are in harmony with, and visually related to: 1. All of the signs included in the sign program as several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors, illumination, sign type, or sign shape have been incorporated into the Sign Program; 2. The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or design motifs included in the building being identified as the sign compliment the design of the building; and, 3. Surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring adjacent approved signs as the surrounding area facing the illuminated signs is commercially zoned; R:\Signs\2002\O2.o095 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlPC Staff Report 1.7-o4.doc 5 B. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants as the standards in the Sign Program apply to all future tenants; and, . 1. The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of this Chapter, in that the sign program complies with all the regulations of this Chapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and height. Further, to the extent the sign program does not comply with the requirements of this Chapter as to sign area, number, location, and height, the proposed sign program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the objectives of this Chapter as The proposed sign program preserves and improves the appearance of the City as viewed from Margarita Road as is proposing signage that compliments and enhances the building. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 03-0733 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332 (Accessory Structures, Class 11) as the proposal is a sign program that permits on-premises signs. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. 03-0733 a revised sign program for the Promenade Medical Center located on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and North General Kearney Road, known as Assessors Parcel No. 921-090-087. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A. Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this ih day of January 2004. . Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] . R:\Slgns\2002\O2-ÐO95 Margarita Medical Sign Program\PC Sta« Report 1-7-o4.doc 6 . . . STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7'h day of January 2004, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\Signs\2002\O2-0095 Margarita Medical Sign Program\PC Staff Report 1-7-o4.doc 7 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA03-0323 Sign Program Revisions Project Description: To revise an approved comprehensive sign program for the Promenade Medical Center. Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-090-087 Approval Date: January 7, 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of sixty-four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency, or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and the landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. The sign program shall include the following provisions: Delete the tower signs, Allow for different types of sign along the Margarita and parking lot frontages, Set a maximum Y2 square feet for every one lineal foot of building frontage for all second story signs with a maximum of 50 square feet per sign, Set a maximum 1 square feet for every one lineal foot of building frontage for all first story signs with a maximum of 50 square feet per sign, Delete using the exposed raceways. R:\Slgns\2002102-o095 Margari1a Medical Sign ProgramlPC Staff Report 1-7-o4.doc B 4. The Advanced Orthopedic Surgery Center tenant sign shall be reduced to 18 square feet. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits for any sign, three copies a revised sign program shall be submitted and approved by staff to incorporate all the Conditions of Approval and the direction provided by the Planning Commission. Prior to issuance of building permits for any sign, the applicant shall pay the City $190.00 for processing the Sign Program application. 6. R:\Slgns\2002\O2-DO95 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlPC Slaff Report 1-7-D4.doc 9 . . . ATTACHMENT 2 PROPOSED SIGNS R:\Slgns\2002\02-o095 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlPC Staff Report 1-7-o4.doc 10 ¡ u~ ". I. ¡I' ~z~ !! II ¡II ' 'I ! 'I: ~~ Ì! " 'I"~' g~ ;1 i I: ¡ ~ ~~ 1, o, " ~. 2~<~z.' ~" '°' "! . ~~ 8~ \11' ¡! r ~i j I 1 / °;; II \~~~~J:'~I ! 'I ; I ~ ¡ !, I ~ ! II! ~ ¡, Ii ~~l .j" g Ii '¡ ': !ill . ~ ~ =- =- c: ce ~ ::c I- -' c: c:." - ton =- ::c =- ~ c:." - c= ::c c:." ~ N II !! !!! ¡ ~ ¡ ! ¡§ ¡ " , 0 ¡ I c:." ¡:::<c c:." '" c: N ce =- c= ce - ::c c:." ce c= -' :3 c: -' ce ~ l- e: ~ c:." =- ce ~ c.= ce = ton c:." - = ~ c: =- c= ::c l- ce T ton c= I c:." ='¡::: ~ e: c:." N I c= æ ~I g => 1= = Ie: c: .L~ I I ~ i ¡ ~~ u; ~ <. ¡I! J!II!.! if ~ ~i!Wl¡ t! unmu fill! mli < OF< < ' , , , ';0 ;.. ;,. e: c= ~ c.= ce = ton -' c: ce c= -' -' c: ::c ton T ton ce = c: = E,-, . c: c:." ~ = ; CCI ce '"I c: ~i E , ~ I ., =- I e: ~¡ = ~'-' ~ => . ~ ce I- = ton ~ '" ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ if - ø ~ ! ffi ~ ê; a. g: ~ :5 ~,¡!@ «",Q; [3:;;;5 ",~ij! ~~~ ~6~ "j[¡J" ¡g§~ ,,~~ I-"'~ ~~~ "'~:;;; ~<.ôg ~~~ ~S1z "'C:[¡J "'~z ;ë02i=! ::~~ f¡@ð:5 §;¡¡:g ¡¡¡;¡s~ !ii!d~ «..z ¡:¡¡:¡~ 1f~;j I- ton - l- e: c= = c= ::c l- ce c= " .... " "" 0:: 00 <= .~ 0 ~ I; . ~ ;): =~- 0 N ~ ~( ) ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~o ~ <š ¡:¡" ~ j¡ ~ J " " ~ :;; . ~ " ~ ð ~ ~ 0 0 " :;; 3:~ ~ 5 o~ ~ ::~.~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ u iH z ! 0 ~ ~ < E " ::: 3 ! o~ ~ ~£ ~ '" .. ~ ~~ ~ :d ~ ~~ ~ š!~ ~ ~ ~¡; ~ =: ::¡~ ~ :-~~ """z ~ ~ ~~m': ~ ¡¡¡J~ ~~ ~ ~:5~o ~ ~:g~ " O:Em';' ~ :::~iii::: ~ ~ z.; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ m¡¡ ~ ~ ~ ~¡:: § ~ " > . d ~ " 0 " ~ ~ ;~I ~:l1 i';1~1 ffi Itl'J! ~IW' !¡)ui z; I!I~ -, m: ffJ ~ I- UI hi ~ ';> ~ ¡;j b - '. c ¡:: æ ë1j '" .. '" :z c ¡;¡ § .... ::¡ w ¡;¡ ¡¡¡ r ~ . . . " .... .. :;; ~. ~. t: ~ ~ ~ ~II ~ ~ "; > ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡ ¡! ~~I " om. ~ Iw! ~ !!jut z; I!I~ -, 00: {-~Î \~ I- III III ~ . ~ j ~ ~ :::Nffi ~~~~~ 5 - '- ~':~~S ~ :d£ ~ ¡ ! \f ~ ,¡;¡ " ! ~d _20" " ~~! ~ ~ "'; . 0 0 ~ Ie .¡;:; . ~ ~ ~ .~ Ii' ~ ~ -E ~~ ~.~ ~~ ~'! :Eo Z' ;:o¡ . . .~ .~ i .j; '!¡ ¡ ~ I~ L~ :š:; !i~ ~;¡ ¡ 0 "'.:. J '" ~M .~!!; Z~ .~ 9 ::;"'1 .~ ~..S~ ;¡ I~ i~ ...~ ~:;: ¡¡ ¡~..~~~ ~ ~¡ ~1 i~ ~~~: .5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ a ~ 81~ Ii' O¡;;:i:: ,§ '.~ ~£I J I~i .~ .~ 1;1I~1 ¥; ffilrn! ~ æ 111I! ~ "U! Z' I!J: -. [ß~ . z ~ ìd~ I- m w ~ ¡¡j ¡¡j ID -' N N " ID ;!: ¡¡j <0 ~ ¡¡j ;!: ... .... '" :;; ¡:: ~ t ~ ~ =m... ~ ¡;: ~ ~g: ~ ~ tJ~S ~ ð ¡:¡;¡ ~ ~ 3 ~ " ~ t¡ ,¡ ~ " ~ ¡:¡ ~ ~ :: ~~ ~ ao~ ~ ;!; B;. ~ ~ "'~ ~ ~.¡¡ ~ . ~ ~ ~ gH ~ ~ . I '" i:î .~ 0 s ; ~ ~ Ê o~ ~ ~.i, ~ :E :;. ~ n ~ '" ~ . o=' ~ ~~ 3 :;.:. ~ ~ <!::: ~ § ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~;æUl~ ~ ~~~;f ; ~..IØ ~ ~~~o ~ ~~2~ ~ :¡::E "'.:. )f ~~iii::: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ .. w": ~ ~ ~ Iii~ ~ a 0 wO 1= II' ~;:iE ~ " > g d ~ ~ . ~~I ~W~ ~ c:::Il ~ 1;11~1 " ~ ffian' ~ ~wl ~ ~ rrJ! z~ I!I: -. U1~ z œ hi . I- m hi ~ g CII !... ~p~~ ': ~ oS ð ~ ~ I ¡¡¡ ~ ~~> ~~~ ~ "'¡ Q 0 ~ ~ ~ ::¡ ~ 0 1<:5 H :;:.; <i ~ u= 8~ :¡¡~ :Eo z' ;,; ,,;.. ;~ ¡;.:. ~ ~~ t~~ ;5:::..;:: @~~~ -.... ~~.. ~..>o ~~~~ 0""'" :::~¡¡¡~ ~ z,;, ~ Œ~ ~ ffi ~~ a ~ WO I< ~ ~¡¡: ~ ¡¡j ;t "' ~ .... ¡if " " ", f ! , . ~. t i1 1 ".. . . . ~ I: ~ 1511 ~ ~ ¡ ~!Ii ~ ~ , 11 ~~! ~ ~m¡ ~ ~~u! ~ŒJ! . ~ . . . ... Œ ~~¡S ~ O~... H~g ~ ~ ~ ;:§ ~ g ::J~ ä~s ~ ""i 0 . 0 Hi ~~ ~:j, :n 8; :¡~ ~- ~a ~ @ ! I T' I I I @ I ¡. , , " I , , ¡ i ¡ ¡ . \ , '~ , ~', . ~ S oJ ¡; . ~ ~ ::m- ¡ ¡¡¡ ~~~ ~ c,qS ~ H£ ~ ~ " " ~ :;¡ . ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '": r ~"'. ~ =: ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ u i 8! ~ . ~ 0 ~ '" 1:: .~ 0 r! " f ð ~ ~ si ~ ~~ 5 :â . ~" ~ :d ~ ¡!~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ;§::: ~ 9 ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~¡:¡Ø);:: ~ ~,,=¡¡¡~ " ~""'" 0 '" Ø) ~ æ=> ¡¡;~ § ~~~:¡ ~ ~~ ¡¡;~ ~ ~ ii~ ~ ~ ¡¡¡~:¡) ~ a g¡ Wo . 1/':<;: iE ! ¡Iii ~ !Ii ~ ; 1>gl <r "",I hul "U! ~ . ¡; ~ ~ z; eJ" -: . ~ I. ... . ~ C'I ~... ; ~~~ i j~S ~ ! ~ ;:¡ ~ ¡;¡ :::~ ~~§ ~ "'~ 0 D ~ ¡ ~ ~ g D ~ E ~.~ .. ~ u" 8; :¡:~ :Eo z' ;:¡ O!.. c=' ~~ >~ ~ ~¡:; ~:! ~~ ~¡:¡m~ ~~:¡:¡ ~...I!!~ ~ ID ~...~:': x~ 2~ ~:E "'~ ::~ iii::: " 2';' " a:~ ~ ~ 5~ a ~ WO If ~;;:¡¡: ~ ATTACHMENT 3 DECEMBER 17, 2003 PC STAFF REPORT R:\Signs\2002\O2-DO95 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlPC Stall Report 1-7-D4.doc 11 . . . CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Planning commiYS¡~ Debbie Ubnoske,~irector of Planning December 17, 2003 DATE: SUBJECT: Promenade Medical, Wall Mounted Signs BACKGROUND On June 18, 2002, staff approved a Sign Program for the Promenade Medical buildings located on the southeast corner of the Margarita and North General Kearny Road (Attachment 1). These office buildings are within a commercial zoning district; however, the Development Code requires application of office zoning district standards for office buildings in commercial zoning districts. This sign program provided standards for three types of signs including entry monumentation, building identification, and tenant identification signs. PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting to amend the Sign Program to allow the placement of four tenant identification signs on the second story wall surface, below the eaves for two different tenants (Attachment 2). Two signs are proposed along the Margarita Road frontage and two other signs are proposed along the parking lot frontage (Attachment 3 and 4). In addition, the applicant is proposing to amend the Sign Program to delete the Building Identification signs on the two towers and is proposing to add a second sign type for parking lot frontage tenant identification signs. Usually, the Director would approve this type of proposal; however, the Director has made the decision to request the Planning Commission to make the final determination. EXISTING CONDITIONS Buildina Identification Sians The approved Sign Program allows three building identification signs. One sign is already built along the parking lot on the archway that connects the two buildings on the corner of Margarita and North General Kearney Road. Two additional building identification signs were approved but not installed on the towers for the 2 story building on the elevation facing Margarita Road. R:\Signs\2002\O2-o095 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlMemo F-1.doc Tenant Identification Siqns The approved Sign Program includes different standards for signs facing the street and signs facing the parking lot. The signs facing a street can have a maximum letter height of 14" and an area not to exceed one square feet for every one lineal foot of building frontage. The signs facing the parking lot can have a maximum letter height of 8" and an area not to exceed 5% of the surface area of the building. The Sign Program further states that all tenant identification signs need to be coordinated to be identical in color, style, size, illumination, and font. Neither the text nor the exhibits of the approved Sign Program make references to second story signs. Currently, tenant identification signs are only installed for the first story tenants. ANALYSIS The Development Code permits approval of a Sign Program for a project, if the Sign Program complies with all the regulations of the Development Code, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and height. However, the Development Code also requires that to the extent the Sign Program standards differ from the Development Code, the Sign Program also should propose to enhance the development to more fully accomplish the objectives of the Sign standards in the Development Code. The Development Code only permits tenant identification signs for office buildings if the main entrance to each suite is from the exterior of the building as opposed to a lobby or courtyard design. This section of the Development Code is not very clear, however, staff is interpreting that the Development Code does not permit signage on the second story office buildings since second story suites cannot obviously have access from the exterior of the building. Since the approved Sign Program did not specifically permit second story signs, staff is not supporting adding second story signs through an amended Sign Program. If the commission desires to add second story signs through an amendment to the Sign Program, staff would recommend a completely different approach to the signage for the entire 2-story building. The Development Code allows additional signage over what is allowed by the Development Code through approval of a Sign Program. The Development Code also requires that if this additional signage is allowed through the approval of Sign Program, the signs should enhance the development. In staff's opinion, in order to enhance the existing building while adding new signage to the second story is to remove the three existing first story signage. Instead, the first and second story signs should be non-illuminated and smaller signs similar to those existing along the parking lot frontage. Otherwise, the second story signs proposed as part of in this amendment will cause a clutter of signage on the building elevations. This clutter is clearly not the intent of the Development Code. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending the Planning Commission: 1. Approve the two signs along the parking lot frontage; 2. Deny the two signs along the Margarita Frontage as they do not meet the standards and the intent of Sign Program specified in the Development Code and aesthetically are enhancing the architecture of the building; Approve first and second story signs similar to the signs along the parking lot frontage and remove the three existing first story signs on the 2-story building; R:\Slgns\2002\O2-o095 Margarita Medical Sign Program\Memo F-1.doc 3. '> . . . . . . 4. Approve adding a second sign type for the tenant identification signs for the elevations along the parking lot and deleting the two tower Building identification signs. Staff further recommends that the Planning Commission direct staff to finalize the Sign Program to be consistent with the Planning Commission's final recommendations; and 5. Direct staff to approve a Sign Program consistent with the Planning Commissions direction on the above. Attachments: 1. Approved Sign Program - Blue Page 4 2. Proposed Sign Program - Blue Page 5 3. Proposed Signs - Blue Page 6 4. Area Calculations for the Proposed Signs - Blue Page 7 R:\Signs\2002102-o095 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlMemo F-1.doc 3 ATTACHMENT 1 APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM R:lSigns\2002\O2-D095 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlMemo F-1.doc 4 . Pt1D2-DCCJÖ- PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA SIGN PROGRAM Submitted by: Margarita Medical Condo Development, LLC Owner . f APPROVED . SUBJECT TO BUILDING DEPT. APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPT. PROJECT MEETS ZONING STANDARDS PERMITS ARE REQUIRED SIGNAT~~ DAT~2 . . . SIGN PROGRAM FOR PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA (I) ENTRY MONUMENTATION "PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA" shall be constructed ofindividual dimensional formed plastic letters with a beveled fàce and sball be 6" in height; the site address of"41238 MARGARITA RD" sball be the same style letters of 4" height. Font sball be "architectural". The monument sball be illuminated by three ground lights shining on the monument. Individual tenant names sball no.t be placed on the monument. Please see Exhibit "A". (2) BŒLOrnGIOENTfHCATION "PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA" sball be attached to the parking lot side archway that connects building "A" and building "B" and shall be constructed of individual dimensional formed plastic letters with a beveled fàce and sballbe 10" in height. Please see Exhibit "ß". (3) TENANT IDENTIFICATION (a) The surfàce area of tenant identification signage sball not exceed one square foot for every one lineal foot of building ftontage which directly fàces the street. Maximum letter height sball not exceed fourteen incþes (14") unless approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. (b) The surfàce area of the tenant identification signage sball not exceed-ñve- ) -r-ð I ptJreent (5%) of the surfàce area of the parking lot side of the building. Maximum letter height sball not exceed eight inches (8") unless approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. (c) All tenant on-site fàscia signage sball be coordinated to be identical in color, style, size, illumination and font. (d) The lettering for tenant signage shall conform to the following specifications: (I) Letters sball be 14"/8" (where applicable) in height; 5" returns 'painted to match X-17 Misty La Habra stucco color. (2) Faces to be 3116' Plexiglass with 3/4", Ðay/Night acrylic Black trim cap. Interior illumination by neon tubing using D.L. approved protective housing throughout or using "Electro-bits" D.L. approved insulators, internal clear Red neon. . (3) Installation: mounted to a nine inch (9") high, five inch (5") wide wireway that runs the length of the letters. The bottom of the letters shall extend down to the bottom of the architectural foam trim element that is a part of the building feature. A remote transformer will be installed behind the wall. Please see Exhibits "C", "Ð" and "E". ( e) Tenant Window Identification. Store identity, graphics, typography and/or company logo may be silkscreened or etched on the tenant's window. The maximum square foot graphic area allowed per window shall not exceed four (4) square feet; provided, however, that in-store neon type signage shall not exceed eight (8) square feet in size. (f) Hanging Signs. Hanging signs shall not be allowed. (g) Banners and Pennants. Banners shall not be pemñtted except as a temporary substitute of permanent signage, not to exceed 90 days, subject to City approval. Pennants are not allowed. Criteria for the temporary signage shall not exceed the criteria for permanent signage. (4) GENERAL SIGN SPECIFICATIONS ..~ ;. o~ ~ . ~i-v",,: ¡.o 'i (a) All building-mounted signs shall meet or exceed all applicable city, state and federal codes. . (b) All signs containing electrical components shall confonn to the Dnifonn Lighting Code. . *-0(- ~fJ \/ . (c) No on-site sign shall be affixed on, above or over the roof of any building, and no on-site sign shall be affixed to the wall of a building so that it projects above the parapet of the building. For the purposes of this section, a mansard style roof shall be considered a parapet. . <i. ,':' .' . c. o' \" .;::::~ 'i1 ;:1 :!¡ ;:: '. . I ~ )~ ,>j ~ , 'ji. Q~ .\~"'C(.,j.~ ".,j. ~\~Q ~'" 1.~~ ,,\ .~i."'~ . . , ' , . rIll' . McArtIle Associates Architects Ari:idt.dlIn . PlaMlnI . InmIorr $838 Ediso1I Pl<ict:' SIliIe 201, Carùtbad, ÇalffomitJ 92008 7~0-4'J1-777$ . New ELECTRICAL RACEWAY C!- ANNEL LeTTER - EXI5TINC:s FOAM TRIM ." ~ . MARGARITA MEDICAL - 5/GNAGE 5CI-IEME 5/GNBAND DETAIL ~ 2/'¿~/oe 'WI McArdle Associates Ai'chiJects . . Arëidteetun 81'1ønnb1g . br/nIJJ,. 58J8 Ed/.r(m PI«. sw. 201 . '. . CarLrba<l; Call/amia 91008 760-43/-7775 AR . i,~: III . ~. 'c. ~ '1- '<> """'\ ~"'Ç>-<> '" ~ ~ '1 "b ' <2. ~"" . 9" 6UF<FACE MOUNTED ELECT~ICAL RACEWAY, pAINTED TO MATCH 610009 COLQR WI . 14" HIGH ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTERS. .... 0' . - MARGARITA MÉDICAL - 51GNAGE 5Cf-IEME 51GN6AND 5ECTION % 'llel,,/(/)% . . - ~ .f::I !:: Q . .;; ;;; . '5 ~ ~ ~:;; 'I'¡~ -. ~Ili ... .~u '2hl ti~¡ - ~~...u ~'. ,.9 I I \ \' I- 17 '\ t 1 I \. I ( [ l1 fl HL, I \ 7~~;~ " , 1-- Pm " I-~ '- ~ -- u . ¡. -- .. -- ~ -l- ,-, ~=: -- -I- ~; ~ =~ I- -I- ~ -- I- -I-- ,.... I- I- b ,. ... -- -I-- '" 1-1- -I- ~~~ 1-1- 1-1- ?~~~ ~I-- [. . " '. '1,. 'J:.I' 1-- 1-- -- '..' .:. -- ~ ~~~ ~ ~-I- rr ~~ 1-1- ill r: ill .'I 0 (f) w ~ ðO -z (f')<{ '0) -,z <{I.!} ~(j) 01- WZ r<{ <{m 1-1- oc-' '«<{ ~o OCi[ :«>- rl- \'11 ~ -\ -.!t tI 10 ~ "£ " ",'d "1P..JIoJ"W P3 C:BSL-IEv-09L ~ ~ . . ;\ ? . d¡O:SO 20 22 ~ew ATTACHMENT 2 PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM R:\Slgns\2002\O2-o095 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlMemo F-1.doc " . PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA SIGN PROGRAM . Submitted by: Margarita Medical Condo Development, LLC and . Promenade Medical Condo Development, LLC Owners . . . . . SIGN PROGRAM FOR PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA (1) ENTRY MONUMENTATION "PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA" shall be constructed of individual dimensional fonned plastic letters with a beveled face and shall be 6" in height; the site address of "41238 MARGARITA RÐ" shall be the same style letters of 4" height. Font shall be "architectural". The monument shall be illuminated by three ground lights shining on the monument. Individual tenant names shall not be placed on the monument. Please see Exhibit "A". (2) BUILDING IDENTIFICATION "PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA" shall be attached to the parking lot side archway that connects building "A" and building "B" and shall be constructed of individual dimensional fonned plastic letters with a beveled face and shall be 10" in height. Please see Exhibit "B". (3) 1ENANT IDENTIFICATION (a) The surface area of tenant identification signage shall not exceed one square foot for every one lineal foot of building frontage which directly faces the street. Maximum letter height shall not exceed fourteen inches (14") unless approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. (b) The surface area of the tenant identification signage shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the surface area of the parking lot side of the building. Maximum letter height shall not exceed eight inches (8") unless approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. (c) All tenant on-site Margarita street side fascia signage shall be coordinated to be identical in color, style, size, illumination and font, and all parking lot fascia signage shall be identical in color, style, size, non-illumination and font. (d) The lettering for tenant Margarita street side signage shall confonn to the following specifications: (1) Letters shall be 14" in height; 5" returns painted to match X-17 Misty La Habra stucco color. (2) Faces to be 3/16' Plexiglas with %", Day/Night acrylic Black trim cap. Interior illumination by neon tubing using (e) (f) (g) (h) (4) u.L. approved protective housing throughout or using "Electro-bits" D.L. approved insulators, internal clear Red neon. . (3) Installation: mounted to a nine inch (9") high, five inch (5") wide wireway that runs the length of the letters. The bottom of the letters shall extend down to the bottom of the architectural foam trim element that is a part of the building feature. A remote transformer will be installed behind the wall. Please see Exhibits "C", "Ð" and "E". The letter for tenant parking lot side signage shall be 8" in height, individual dimensional formed plastic letters with a beveled face, black, with an "architectural" font. Tenant Window Identification. Store identity, graphics, typography and lor company logo may be silk-screened or etched on the tenant's window. The maximum square foot graphic area allowed per window shall not exceed four (4) square feet; provided, however, that in-store neon type signage shall not exceed with (8) square feet in size. Hanging Signs. Hanging signs shall not be allowed. Banners and Pennants. Banners shall not be permitted except as a temporary substitute of permanent signage, not to exceed 90 days, subject to City approval. Pennants are not allowed. Criteria for the temporary signage shall not exceed the criteria for permanent signage. . GENERAL SIGN SPECIFICATIONS (a) . . All building-mounted signs shall meet or exceed all applicable city, state and federal codes. (b) All signs containing electrical components shall conform to the Uniform Lighting Code. . (c) No on-site sign shall be affixed on, above or over the roof of any building and no on-site sign shall be affixed to the wall of a building so that it projects above the parapet of the building. For the purposes of this section, a mansard style roof shall be considered a parapet. . ATTACHMENT 3 PROPOSED SIGNS R:\Slgns\2002\O2-o095 Margarita Medical Sign ProgramlMemo F-1.doc 6 . . -fJ- i I I-r I ' i i . i .1 ~I ~ ~ '" ~I J~@\:_---- . ,,~~ ì"é"!i\'! ~~n ;¡Æ~~ . ~~o~ ~~~ " a .. <= 0 " " ,: M m 0 0" men ~ ~ q... ~ ;¡¡ :~Š ~ H. ~ ~ 3 " " ~ :;;; ~ ~ ~ g 9 ~ ~ 4::::~ ~ ~~: ;r ~ .; ~ ê =~ ffi ~ 0 ~ 11" 0 " ~ ~ <i E ::: 3 o~ , ~& ~ :E ¡¡ - :n " ~. ~ :: o!~ , :;: ~~ ~:> ¡;.:. ò ~ ;¡~ ~: - zo ~ g ;;; ~4S;; - ~~;~ i :i:"':';:1 >:4 !!~ ~ !L ~o c 20:>01:; g ~H1 ~ :~ ~~ ~!i IF ~ ,~..... , ~ ~ Iß~ ~ ~ 3:. ~ Ii! "~ ! g" ß " ~I~I 0 ffilln; ~ nul ~ "Il~! ~N ê I &a: '" '¡:¡ .~ û z; I!I: -. m: .~ ~ 1&1 I- m 1&1 ~ r ¡! ,¡ i 0 b!! o! ill ¡ ¡ ! I- 8. ! ¡ " . ~ç ~~ , ~~ § , ¡ ~~ ~! ~- !~ n II ~~ J ) ;~ , 'J § - I -~l ! ~ ;1 ¡ ! ' I, i . Ii' ¡i " ¡ . 5' ';;~ "'E ~~ ~:æ 13 w ¡f ~ '" ~ ~ !;¡ cI z '" ~ e '" w g¡ ",8: ~~ <g~ ~ê ~~ R~ ~~ Œw ",'" '" =>'" co "'0: « """ ~ zZ '" 0« "' coO: ~ ~~ ~ """ ~ ~g ~ ~§¡ >- ~15 w «W ~!j! >-z ¡Ó'" a~ ~§g ~~ ~~)~~ ~fu5~~ ~~~~~ '.".~';:Œ!;¡ ~~U~ """>-~= ~ ¡g 0: « ~ 15 Z ~ ~ -~ 0: ~ ~ '" z § ¡¡¡ '" ~ '" ¡;> >- z 1t "' :;; ~ '" t;¡ ~ tli ;;¡ '" N N '" 3' ?¡ ¡;¿ ~ !;: co a' Œ ~ ¡;¿ ~ '" g ~~ " §~ . ~H ~ i~ ~ ~ , in it ~ .~ ~ ['" § ~;¡; ,.n i Ii i ~-¡i~ ~ -., .,"" ~2, .~~!; i ~~ ~ ~.m. §~ ~ dHi!d §~ ~ ¡;ihtH ~~ ~ ¡i~i'~H g~ ~~Æ~'im ".,,¡¡"!~H¡ ~o ¡, . "s ~~ £~; ~HH ~N ~ I ::!a: G " " >- ~ ~ J ~ '"' < E U > ~ ~-~ ~ ~~! i 7;Ji~ ~ ¡:;.." ~ ~ ~ ~ . 1:1 ~ ' i ~ ~ u ¡, g ~ ~ ;¡ ~ " ! ê ¡¡ ~ ~ co ~ ~ <:i ~ 8~ ~@, :0::' ~.~ "'~ 0= ",< Iñ~ >~ "'M o~ ~ iJ' } J i: ~ " > ~:Šm~ ~ ~::;:;::: ~ ~~~~ ~ ž'1s ~~ Ii ;¡::,: z~ ~ ~:E "'.; ^ ~~ ¡¡;~ . ~ z~ 5 ~ ii ~~ > ~ ~ m' ~ a ~ WC > 11"';: ¡ 8 ~ > " g " " ~ £ ¡¡ .' " , ., ¡ ¡Ii ¡;¡ I ~ ! ~1~1 ffillni 'ilIW! ~t11 Z' , I!JW -: 10: ~, w' I- m w ~ . . . c::J z æ ;:) I- U if ;:) z c:c :E LLI a:: 0 LL. LLI CC Q LLI ¡:¡: æ LLI :;::. LLI CC 0 l- t/) Z 0 ëñ z UI :E is ..... ..... c:c ~ NEW NON-ILLUMINATED LETTER SCALE 112" = 1'.0" MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL NEW NDN.ILLUMINATED FLAT CUT OUT LETTERS. LETTERS: USE GEMINI 6' "ARCHITECTURAr FONT STYLE, BEVEL FACE, FORMED PLASTIC LEmRS FOAM FILLED FOR SILICONE FOR ATTACHMENT PAINT: PAINT ALL LETTERS BLACK ø I - .._-----_!?::~~----~-------\ ADVANCED ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY CENTER G ! 5'-6" 1-----------'--" ENDODONTICS -rr i GEMINI FORMED"",. j lEmRS "if FLUSH MOUNT WITH -----. : i. SILICONE TO WAll "1 J{ ,","OVED 'NSTALlA"'" DETA" PtAST>CFO'"'OLHTE" ,'.,..' ..0,,_0,. ."" C...',-" .-:-. ,'0°"""'",...,,. """,,".'. """"'.!"""""~""'.:ß":,-.,,,,",,,..,,......~;.,:;ð~!!!'..1J1ì!"'~,"""\,",.,,.~~~;:,..:..., Client sigI!ature T"'> "'Q< ,> TOO o",-,>,vo P~PO";Y 'F ,V'-OK"' ><" m=<> " '" 'or '° "OP"oo",o, " ,vu,,-o '" P"-T ,V"","T 'V""TO' ",>°".' "'-, """"-' O,="""'- TO ~'" "'OW, TO "- """Vi'eo " on.."> W EST(.~~T~"~ MEMBEROF MEMBEROF ~ CcSA U'V'W .-.".."--.- """"",.." PROJECT TITLE.. PROMINADE MEDICAL BUILDING. UPSTAIRS ADDRESS.. TEMEC LA CALIFORN WESTERN SIGN SYSTEMS DA VISTA DR. SAN MARCOS CA. 92069 'HONE- 760 -736.6070 FAX. 76~ .6073 E.MAIl..w",""õg,@"I."m PReSENT" BY.. INCHA LOCKHART ORAWNBY.. R. HAINES CUSTOM'. A...OVA. ATTACHMENT 4 AREA CALULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED SIGNS R:\Slgns\2002\D2-GO95 Margarita Medical Sign Program\Memo F-1.doc 7 . . . Proposed Signs Square Footage Lineal Feet of Square foot of Square footage of the Sign the Building Signage of the Signage Frontage Permitted by permitted by the Sign the Program Development Code Endodontics (Street 9.67 21' 11" 22 11 Frontage) Endodontics (Parking Lot 3 28' 4" 15 14 Fronta~e) Advanced Orthopedic Surgery Center 26.29 36' 36 18 (Street Frontaae) Advanced Orthopedic Surgery Center 8.9 40' 9" 22 20 (Street Frontage) R:\Signs\2002\O2-0095 Margarita Medical Sign Program\Memo F-1.doc 8 ITEM #4 . . . CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Planning Commissioners Dan Long, Associate Planner DATE: January 7, 2004 SUBJECT: Item continued from November 19, 2003 Planning Commission Hearing (PA03- 0347) Griffin Communities, Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan PA 4A RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project on November 19, 2003 and approved a motion to continue the project for one month, however, the plans were not complete in time for the December 17, 2003 Planning Commission hearing. At the November 19, 2003 Planning Commission hearing, a sub-committee (Olhasso and Mathewson) was formed to discuss revisions for the project. The subcommittee met with staff and the applicant on December 3, 2003 and discussed some major concepts that needed to be addressed. Staff has reviewed the revised plans and has determined that the revised plans have addressed most of the concerns of the Planning Commission. However, staff does have some additional recommendations as summarized below, which have been included in the conditions of approval. The recommended enhancements are a result of comments from the Planning Commission hearing of November 19, 2003 and of the sub-committee. A Resolution of Approval has been attached for your consideration. The staff report packet and minutes from the previous meeting (November 19, 2003) are also attached for your reference. The following is a list of changes prepared by the applicant: PLAN ONE 1. Elevation A - Mediterranean: a. Ceramic tile accents added at garage walls Standard courtyard walls with wrought iron gate shown on elevations b. 2. Elevation B - Ranch: a. Redesigned the roof configuration to produce horizontal roof form more appropriate for Ranch style. Top of roof height now measured at 18'-6" as compared to 16'-6" for elevations A and C. R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SPIGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4. PAO3-0347\PC SR memo 1-7-04.doc 1 3. PLAN TWO 1. f. b. Dormer element added to front elevation. Additional siding provided on garage, front projection and on dormer. c. d. Standard courtyard walls with wrought iron gate shown on elevations. Additional siding provided on side elevation gables and projection, wrap-around and rear elevation. Removed river rock base at garage, at front projection window and wrap around (replaced with siding). Removed Dutch gable from all elevations, replaced with standard side gable e. f. g. Elevation C - Craftsman: a. Standard courtyard walls on elevations with wrought iron gate shown. b. Shutter removed from front elevation and front window changed to 5050 slider. c. Arbor with overhead trellis added at courtyard entry. d. Gable vents added to front elevation. Elevation B - Ranch: a. Redesigned the roof configuration to produce horizontal roof form more appropriate for Ranch style. Top of roof height now measured at 25'-10" as compared to 24'-4" for elevations C and D. Dormer element added to front elevation. Double post porch support and stone veneer base eliminated and replaced with single post support and railing at front porch. Recessed window at front elevation eliminated and brought out to front of wall surface to resemble Ranch style. Additional horizontal siding added on front and side elevations. Porch railing added at side yards. b. c. d. e. Elevation C - Craftsman: a. Signature Craftsman style windows added on front elevation. b. Window with shutters replaced with wider slider windows. c. Window grouping at laundry room revised to two square elements at "signature" window. windows matching Elevation D - Monterey: a. Front porch element redesign to include a two-story tower element with arched entry and window elements. Also includes 16" recessed windows at 2nd story tower element. Roof orientation above garage turned to shed away from second floor balcony to produce bolder massing forms. R:\Product Review\Roripau9h Ranch SPIGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\PC SR memo 1-7-04.doc 2 2. 3. b. . . . . . . PLAN THREE 1. 2. 3. PLAN FOUR 1. f. g. c. Base of popped out element at second floor of left elevation changed to "Scallop" design to enhance Monterey style. Roofing revised to show "S" tile roof. Left elevation 2nd story window changed to arched window. d. e. Elevation A - Mediterranean: a. Ceramic tile accents added at garage and porch walls. Elevation B - Ranch: a. Redesigned the roof configuration to produce horizontal roof form more appropriate for Ranch style. Top of roof height now measured at 25'-8" as compared to 24'-6" for elevations A and C. Recessed window at front eliminated and brought out to front wall surface to resemble Ranch style elements. Two windows above entry replaced with a single window. Additional horizontal siding added on all elevations. Double post porch support and stone veneer base eliminated and replaced with single post support and railing. Hipped and Dutch gables replaced with side gable at front and side elevations. Exposed outriggers eliminated. b. c. d. e. f. Elevation C - Craftsman: a. Main window above garage replaced with "signature" Craftsman style window. Window with shutters on second story of front elevation eliminated and replaced with wider windows without shutters. b. Elevation B - Ranch: a. Redesigned the roof configuration to produce horizontal roof form more appropriate for Ranch style. Top of roof height now measured at 27'-4" as compared to 24'-6" for elevation C and 25'-0" for elevation D. Double post porch support and stone veneer base eliminated and replaced with single post support and railing at front porch. Additional siding added on all elevations. Dormer element added at front elevation. Recessed window at front elevation eliminated and brought out to front of wall surface to resemble Ranch style. Horizontal siding and porch railing added at side elevation. Dutch gables and outriggers replaced with side gables and siding. b. c. d. e. R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SPIGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\PC SR memo 1-7-04.doc 3 2. 3. Analysis: Elevation C - Craftsman: . a. Main window above garage replaced with "signature" Craftsman style window. Shutters have been eliminated on front elevations. Window grouping at right side of front elevation replaced with smaller square windows matching "signature" windows. b. c. Elevation D - Monterey: a. Main roof forms redesigned to provide for second story balcony at entry. Roof forms also simplified. Balcony on front elevation relocated to left side and replaced with tower element with gable and two arched windows. Bedroom windows above garage changed to two smaller single.windows. Roofing revised to "S" tile roof. Base of popped out element on second story on left elevation changed to "scallop" design to enhance architecture style. b. c. d. Staff has reviewed the proposed changes and has determined that the product review does not fully conform with the Design Guidelines of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. In reviewing the proposed project, staff has determined that the project does not provide adequate articulation on all four sides as required in the Specific Plan (Section 4.10.3.5). In addition, it is staff's opinion that the Monterey style homes should extend the front balcony the full length of the front elevation in order to met the intent of the Design Guidelines. However, staff feels that if the following conditions of approval are implemented into the necessary plans, the project would be consistent with the Design Guidelines. PLAN ONE 1. 2. a. 3. a. b. c. d. e. . Elevation A - Mediterranean: a. Remove shutters and enlarge the arched window on front elevation. Add arched windows on the sides and rear elevations and remove shutters. b. Elevation B - Ranch: Wrap siding around the beginning of fence on left elevation. Elevation C - Craftsman: Revise venting to differ from the Ranch style. Provide shingle siding on side yard projections. Revise front window to a pediment style window. Revise rear elevation window to a pediment style window. Revise garage door style by providing a wood appearance windows and eliminating . R:\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\PC SR memo 1-7-04.doc 4 . . . PLAN TWO 1. Elevation B - Ranch: Wrap siding around to beginning of fence on right elevation. a. 2. Elevation C - Craftsman: 3. a. b. c. d. Wrap the band around to the side from the porch to the garage. Revise venting to differ from the Ranch style. Revise rear elevation window(s) to a pediment style window to match front. Revise garage door style by providing a wood appearance and eliminating windows Elevation D - Monterey: a. Extend front balcony to the edge of the residence above garage. b. Eliminate all shutters and provide additional arched windows on each elevation to match the front elevation. PLAN THREE 1. c. d. Revise vents to reflect a Monterey style and differ from other styles. Provide decorative windowsills on side and rear elevations. Elevation A - Mediterranean: a. b. Provide additional arched windows on each elevation. Add decorative windowsills for all arched windows. a. Elevation B - Ranch: 2. Add decorative windowsill to rear elevation window on second story and on left elevation window above double-doors. a. Elevation C - Craftsman: 3. b. c. PLAN FOUR Add pediment style windows on left elevation window above double doors and on second story of rear elevation. Revise shutters to reflect Craftsman style to differ from Ranch style. Revise garage door style by providing a wood appearance and eliminating windows 2. a. Elevation B - Ranch: Provide decorative windowsills on rear and side elevations. 1. a. Elevation C - Craftsman: Revise the rear window on the second elevation to a pediment style window. R:IProduct RsviewlRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\PC SR memo 1-7-04.doc 5 b. Provide matching stone veneer at the garage and wrap around side to beginning of fence. Revise garage door style by providing a wood appearance and eliminating windows . c. 3. Elevation D - Monterey: a. Extend the balcony on the second story of the front elevation on the opposite side of the tower element to extend to the edge of the residence. Eliminate all shutters and provide additional arched windows on each elevation to match the front elevation along with decorative windowsills b. Summary: As mentioned previously, staff has added conditions of approval to ensure these changes are made, which would bring each product into conformance with the intent of the Design Guidelines of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the project with the attached conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7 2. PC Resolution No. 2004-- - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval . 3. Summary Matrix, dated December 17, 2003 - Blue Page 9 4. Lighting - Blue Page 10 5. November 19, 2003 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 11 6. November 19, 2003 Planning Commission Minutes - Blue Page 12 . R:\Product Review\Rortpaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\PC SR memo 1-7-04.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PA03-0347\PC SR memo 1-7-04.doc 7 . . . 0 NOV 2 4 2003 i.-~i ...: ~'-~-::o_~~~:-:::::::::..d SHEA HOMES INLAND EMPIRE RORIPAUGH RANCH Temecula, California SheaHomes --....... SHEA HOMES {~ ~J,~:T:(~~r~Y;ï:! ""W,,"~CI"" ,.1".", C"'M,C,""" Ph. 19'"739-0;00 'n.(OOO)738-"" Inland Empi'e Division RORIPAUGH RANCH Temecula, California """" 0 KYOT NO, ""'" 0 "I 0 I 0 . ~~ . c "0 II ~ 'I II ~ ~ 'I !,I . I 0 ~ ~ e lm ce- i> II 1M "I :II ,I ¡¡¡ !" ð ¡;¡ ~ e ~ ~ q ... i~ ~ '" , ~ II 1:,1 ;:¡ ,1 !,,¡¡ '" ::: ;:¡ ~ 0 ¡E~¡¡ gjii:i¡ ~:W' ~¡m; 0 ~ :z: u '" Z" ".J -""~ ~ ~ "" E . ~ '- ~ 0 '" ,!¡ """ '- .' > .~ ¡;O5:z:ïõ "'.....' u :::"""š. Ö.,.. .!i -'" ~ ~-; "", " ~~ i! <.. ......!!~e ..... . ..... .. rn ~ ~... 0 ~ ð ~ ::: I ~ 61 ~ .8" I o~ ~ .t¡;¡ ~ ::;;1 ~.ð§~ ~ '" "" .~'" > ~¡ ",h. g ..s::: ""of. w 0 I . J: .01.- ~ ~I .~ iii' ~~ii if!, 0 ,,0-," Ì$ c ,:,:;~ ::E:¡ š !5'¡':¡i - ~:!~¡:, ~I!¡¡!! @ ::I: u ...: Z as " r/} <ï: :;; ~ Ê .. 2), ~:sJW ~ ~O ð!I'J £~::I:iö.; g.!!<~;J~ Ii: B rT1 '" ~ " "'.... . ..... e .. .....~p.." " """..... ¡.. ~r/}~~ Ê 0 u ~ Ii ~ ~- . !.- ::s! '!~ði..§ ~ I ¡¡h~ ~ ...= N .. 0 . 0 Plan I Elevation "D" . Meditenanean . Plan 1 ElevaHo" "A" . Mi..io" Conceptual Elevalion, Plan I Plan I Elevation "C" . F,.nch SheaHomes ~..._....... Scale, 114"=1'.0" SHEA HOMES "",W.rolowC,.I,- ",""" C,oo~_CA92"O ,""""m-"," '~"""'J8-"" . 0 Key Notes: CD Ao,h.",,;.,I,'=' ø (ow'oo".c,.....,--"TII<R~' CD ,.", 0 ,.",,'" ".. Trim G) Do"""..,,,h" @ W'"",=;. CD """""".. V"", (8) W,"""..&Trim (2) Do".".."'"'" @",ri".""",", @ "',,"".,Ch;=o,"oo" @ Woo"""oo.,.,,;., @"""";"TlloVo.. @ M""'~';,",IG,",oDoo, @ 'moh", @ ",.om".'..T." @ '-"~"w"hWoo"h"oo.Gri" @ D~orn"..Vo" Inland Empire Division C ~Ii~:T:ft~.¥:f::,i;,i RORIPAUGH RANCH Temecula, California 0 .,OY NO. ""... "119") [J 0 0 < æ ! 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 81 81 1 1 =- c .g .. > . ¡¡¡ ';¡ ,..¡ c .g ~ ¡¡¡ . .:: c 1;:;'1. ~¡i:¡¡ ~ @:~¡:, ~¡¡¡¡! () ~ :I: U Z" 1:1) ¿.'~ ~ c "" C ~~ ~ ~ iiOQ~ !:I: i ö ,¡ ~«~::J~ B~ '0 «" '" ,; ¡l, ~ :I: .E .... ¡.. 1:1) ~ 0 ~ c . ¡¡: a .g ~ ¡¡¡ ~ ~ g 0 u Ii ~ o~ o~ --. tI:! i i ~. 3 ~.. ~. ~ CO1 ...L ìi ~i m<~ " 0 0 . . . 0 j I ;: ì . c .ß ~ ¡¡¡ . . ~ D ~¡WI IS,,:!! ~:W' >;;:, ~¡l1h ~'" ~ ~ ¡. :I: u í/} Z «I ~ § <.¡; 1:, ~ :~ ~~ *o~:I:ð !:I:.~ö.¡ .!!<~:J:; ~ ~ " < ~ .....Æ~e .... .= ....~ í/} ~ 0 ~ c . ¡; ~ .2 .. > u ¡¡¡ .. . ~ g 0 () I Q) SJ -; 08;; ~ O~ ~ ~~~ ~ ::I:! ~'. ð"'.i. ~ ~j ~~i~"' g ..s::= "~ud . 0 0 I L______----- I . 0 d .2 ;¡ > u ¡¡¡ I I I I ~! & u æ ~ d .2 ~ ¡¡¡ 0 ¡:ii~. ~¡¡¡h 0 :z: u - [/} Z.. :; ~do(ï= - '<:< 0 Ii'" .. ¡';t:¡" 0 ..' :;: S iiO ¡:¡ -:: ;,...... u ~ :::"""š." . ~ ~o(~~~ 3 ~~ 1! 0( g ¡¡. :z:~~8 ~ [/}-2~ 0 ~ þ Ii. -- ol a . i 1 ~ I !m~ ~ ...s= "'Bd ~ 0 . 0 SheaHomes ....._.~- 2280W.d!owC;.', '"',,"'" C~o~.CA"'"" ",,""""'."00 fÞ""',m..," 0 <TOY No. ""... ~ . "'" ~ ilf ~ "",dF]oo,A"" "".r. I I \ " Conceptual Floor Plan 2 - 2885 s. r. Scale, 1/4" = 1'.0" SHEA HOMES Inland Empire Division RORIPAUGH RANCH Temecula, California . 1 "W' ¡ P g ~ ...,........ ~ ~ F]n, F],., A"" >2". r. 0 ~D~:f:~~~g,:!;;li """" 0 I ~ n 0 SheaHomes ......-......... 0 12"W"'~C;"', ,,',,"'" ;:-;;:;;1[""'" ,",(m <TOY NO. Plan 3 Plan 3 Elevation "Coo - F..nch Conceptual Elevation< Plan 2 Seal" 1/4"=1'-0" SHEA HOMES ~ Key Notes: CD "'""""""'0001 (2) '~'mm,C,",""',,,;¡,ooor CD ,.,'" 0 '"""",'oomTrim CD ,,",on"" U,"" 0 w"""'~" ø Co'""'"..Y"oo CD W""" ,,"' &Trim ø ,,",on"","""oo @ ",riw""IS"'" @ """"'"C"'m",,"m,' @ W..""'m.""'", @ "",om",, T'" v", @ ",.IS"",",'G..",,,,", @"""'" @ Eop""""'T." @ n"""'",Wmo,m'"","II RORIPAuo8RANCH Temecula. ~ornia O. ~~i~'r;;~~;.~('~ ¡r",""" "'~. Inland Empire DIvisIon n . . 0 . II I-n-I- " fen.eline Roof PI.. ... ...1, ",. -,.... Right Elevation ~ --~--I--I----I- 6' fenceline----,-,-- --- - ---1------,- -1- --- ---, I I Rear Elevation Left ElevaUon SheaHomes ~~_....... Conceptual Elevation' Plan 2 - "A" Scak 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEA HOMES Inland Empire Dlvi,ion ftKTGYGROUP V ~!lY,::i¡':;:;1'ii::~ill "",W.."owc,"" ",""" C_.CA"'", Ph (909)"'-"" Fu;("""'-"" RORIPAUGH RANCH Ternecula, California 0 <TOY NO- ""'" '""'" 0 ~ ~ Cl D -r r ..6-.S[ . :~ 1 ~ I,:: I. D . .2 .. ~ ¡¡¡ .ë .. ¡;¡ I 1 1 J ~ ~ to ..6-.S[ I I I I I II I I 1 1 ~ ~ . ~ 0 . .2 .. ~ ¡¡¡ ."".A. ~~!~¡~ Õ'I-;11 ~ ffi:¡¡" ~!m! 0 ... ;¡ :I: u (/} Z.. ~ p,¡.-('ë .!!. 'o::<~~" 0. 0 ,.:¡ - §;, 0 is ~ ! :I: i r" . u e"'" ¡¡¡.!! -( OJ ~= ~ B ¡z:¡ 11 -( ¡¡ g. In .... i :l., 8 u ..... - .... u g (/} p:: ... u 0 p:: ~ . .2 .. ~ ¡¡¡ = .:: ~II . .. ! ð . . ¡ ;¡ 1 h~"- 0; ..;~~ ~ I .' I"" ~ ,..c: "'of.! ¡¡ D . 0 .~rPl.,'C' """11'.,.", Rea< Elevation SheaHomes ---~- ""W"",lowC'.I, S."."" C,roM.C""" Ph"",) "',"00 'u""""""" 0 <TOY No. 200- . R;ght Elevation - - ~ -6' fenceHng -,- ----nll------ I ,I Left Elevatinn Conceptual Elevatiom Plan 2 ' "C" Scale: 114" = 1',0" SHEA HOMES C" ~.T.~:r.!fROUP.... ¡Q,¡f ""', mn--"',,"" .... ",":..".""':2::;::;ß:1 Inland EmpIre OM,Ion RORIPAUGH RANCH Temecula. California . , 'fenceHne """" :l ~ ~ 11 0 c: ",...A. ~¡¡~!~ 0{;J ; a:¡:; CJ:!= ~im! A ~ 0 n . ~ ~ :z= u en Z '" ¡¡.¡ . -( ï3 b~:EI'" * 0 is !:Z=~O ....,. ~ ...., ",' ';"'" o¡ ....-; ~ ¡¡.¡ -g < g :z=~~~ en ~ .... ¡.. ~ 0 ~ j 81. - 6 ~~- i ...ð-- d >" - . 01 .'Í~~ > ".u.~ ~ 0 / I . . . 0 ~ 0 , I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ÞI¡ ~¡; ~¡: ,,0-,19 \ i!i!; 18 :~ 10 --l I J~!¡ Þ" !¡ ; 1 1 í~ 1 _.J lþ!¡ c " ~¡E¡¡ ~'¡i!! ~:~r ~¡m; '" ~ ~ - . " :I: u '" en Z.. '" ¡¡,¡ = <'Š ~ ~~~~ , ~ > .~ ';'~Oi3:I:ð E" ..... ~ r" . 0" ..... '" v.. ... 8 .....,- F < '".... ~ - ~ rTl '" < .. ". ..... = " e .. ~ ..... ~ ..... .. . ..... - .... E-o ~ en ~ ~ 0 U ~ - ~ ¡ " .I 00 ê " - i ¡:::¡! ' .~" g 0 'í .:¡" ;; ~i hð¡i . Q)I ;~u¡á ~ ..s:= "- r/.) 0 0" ] "' Q) f ';; ] ¡ Z ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ H j :¡ , ~ ¡ ~ ' ~ .,i , 'E . f ~ ~ .' ~LH~H~i'¡ n !P~~'1~iH]i¡ ~n~H~HðUH ~ GBeeeG888@@@@êê@@ = i ~ ~ = ,g ~ ¡¡¡ = . ¡¡: = . ~ ~ 0; ~ Î' = .2 ;¡ ~ ¡¡¡ = . ¡¡: 0 .. ~ r:: ~ = .9 ~ ¡¡¡ = . ¡¡: ... = . ¡¡: , - 0 = .' .9 Ü ~ ! ¡¡¡ ü .. .. " 0 - '" 0. 8 = 0 u 0 ;;¡;¡& IL:;¡:;~ :>" ,¡i - @ ~;¡, CJ:Ë; ~¡¡¡¡! @ ::I: U FA Z OS '" ".JI< 'M ¡¡.¡ = "'" ¡:: ~~~ :I:iO. e OS <¡¡¡;:J-; ¡¡.¡-g<¡¡ ,.,...!¡:l.,S .....=,...1) tl)M~", 0 ~ JI' - O~ ð ~ " i ~.~~- ~ .. ;~~ . (1)1 '-H" , ~ "_0'. W 0 , I . . . 0 "l-." ~ Ig ,~ ,to 0 "l-." c .E ;¡ ~ ¡¡¡ J: .. ö1 .5 .. ~ to , ] "l-," ~ i " ! 0 c ~ ~ ¡¡¡ i¡m¡ ~i¡¡¡1 @Æ" ~¡;¡¡! 0 I - ~ ~ ::c u Z.. <.¡¡ ~~ ::c:; O~ ~~ <¡: ~e ...." ~¡.. 0 ~ rn '" ¡¡¡ c Ii i:. ~ ~ 0:.' ~ .. a -; 0 õ H:I:i > - e ~.!i -< "' -.¡¡¡'" ~,j¡ ..... Ii ~ ....." ~ rn- 0 u c .E ;¡ t ¡¡¡ ~ ~ I SI £ - ~ 0 '08" - ï ¡¡¡~ ~ ~i :.~~~..¡. i ( )I oH~c- ~ ,.s::: "'0<.1 ~ 0 0 ..0-." 0 " .g '¡;j t ¡¡¡ .E .. ~ ~ ~ to ;- ~ ~ 0 ... ~ ~!~~¡~ O¡::¡ ffié' >-:';:, ~~~H! 0 :z:: u f CI) Z .!!! ,;, ~"-( E £~~~~ æ;ou~ .g. :z:: i ö .; ~:! ~::>-; ¡¡¡;¡ -("'-(i: .B~~~e ~ '" :z:: ] -~ 8 CI) ~ 8 0 ~ " .g ~ ¡¡¡ :; OJ II ð ~- ~t j ~.. . :~tH ~ O""", ~ ~I ";;ad " ~" 0 0 " ~ ,8 1 ~ I'" to I' "E-," . . . 0 "E-," . .g ~ ¡¡¡ .E .. ¡;¡ ~ ¡; ! u ~¡m! !5'i',!1 0,'." ~F ~I'¡i!! 0 ~ :I: u p 00 Z '" '" ~ § -(ï3 ~ Î> :::E ~ ~~ ¡¡; ::. 0 ~. ..... -U'" ~" ..... .3 ~ :I: -Ë. ö <Û ~ ~ -(~~'a ¡¡¡ .; rT' ... -( ¡¡ .... ] " e ~ ,j¡..... .... u - ""'.!;""... ~ 00 ." g '"'" 0 0 u ~ . .3 ~ ¡¡¡ I 8! ~ .~~ I 0 ï .:¡" ;; :Ijj hð!:i . Cij .. -~!ó . ( )I ~.~b:¡ g ...c= ""u.. - :;¡ ,:¡ 0 0 0 ~¡¡ "-"--- OJ I I I I I I I I I I , iJ~¡ ~¡; !~~!¡ , , l:il; NI' IIi: Iii 0::::::::::::: c .~ ü . '" II!: þ!¡ ::::d i:it. f¡' , , ::::d ;¡ ~ .:¡ .., c . ~ 15 e 0 0 .:; ~ !~~ . . . ;¡; ~ .~ õ. 0 Ii! !þ!¡ , , 0 ,;~.;¡.a. .::=;. ::J' oil - O,:¡, ~é' ~m!! 0 .. c .¡: J ;¡ c .~ Õ. 0 e 0 0 .:; ~ ;¡ c .~ Õ. 0 :I: u rA Z '" on ..,..~ ~ c ...... c:: ::g~~ ~O ~~ ~:I:~OtÛ a .......- ij -< ¡z¡ >-' :::I 'ã rT) 1! -< ¡¡ "'.... .!! ~ e :I:.=~" r/ ~ ¡... 0 ~ ... a 0 2 .., ~ i gl ~ ~ ~ i h. ~II. .. z I .~;~~ . I ~]ð<! ~ ;¡ c .9 Õ. 0 0 '] ,-- I 0 . . . ¡if ~ ,~--- 1 1 1 !II! 1 ! 1 1 L_- 0 0 q ~:¡;;¡ I!t @ ~ "hl9 1 '\0 L'..J ~: 1 1 1 :~ 1 1 1 =======-===-- , 'I .:11 :: , 'I ~ " , :, ----- " I~ 'ä :~ II 1-1: :::::::~ ~ ~~ ,-----~, I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I L_~T-.J 1 I -----.I š ~ ¡ . ¡; . ~ U tI) Z OS ~ ~ c -«ï: ':"¡, '0:' i ~~ ".' ,oo!¡ > .~ :;;", 0 is ~-; 0::, ~ ,g r'" ~ 6:::: ~ ~..!! £~ -« OJ ,..,::1 u rT1 '0 -« ~ ."'.... .3 ~ e ~ ~.!;....~ g tI) ~ 8 0 ~ ..; . ~ j J ( ) 81 ~ .~" ¡ o~ ï ¡¡:¡~ ~ ~! hð~::' z (ij .. ;§~ ~ ]1 Wi:! ~ 0 0 , :<¡ Plan 4 Elevation "B" - Medit«ranean Plan 4 Elevation "A" - Mission Plan 4 Elevation "C" - French SheaHomes. --- Conceptual Elevations Plan 4 Scale, 114"=1'-0" 0 m'w."",.,,"" s",."" ;;:~~;a"'" fu;"'9) sroY NO. Inland Empire Dlvi.ion R 0 R ie~~~~ .r~~ C H SHEA HOMES :--1 Key Notes: ~ CD _.,,~;",I= CD """"""""'m'"'"TH,""'" 0,- (6) ,_,,~.fœm"m CD """""~L'"," (6) Woodf~;. ø """'""'~,Vm= (6) Wood",.."rim 0 """""~,,,,- @ "M""""'., @ -""~",="",,,,", @ W=""""""""' @ """""~TII,Vm' @ """'=""",'0="""", @P"."..1f @ '""""""'"T.,, @ "R=,.w'.W="""".Grili @ """m"~V,", ~ 0 ~~~J:\~d:' "",IOJ n . . . 0 0 ~ a~",..'A' Right ElevaHon ~ Rear ElevaHon Left Elevation SheaHomes -_....... Coneeptnal Elevations Plan 4 . "A" Scale, 114" = 1'-0" "',w."..,""" So.."" ,-.. CA 928" """")739-"00 '.""')7"."" SHEA HOMES Inland Empire Division C ~jI!~9r;~~~:::;{¡ 0 ,1OYN0.1- RORIPAUGH RANCH Tcmccula. CalIfornia 1111"" n 0 0 ~ I I I ~. I - ¡; ! 0 ,~.a~ ~¡,~~~ olL ffif ~¡Hi :.;"". C ~ u ~ Z OS ' en «ï3 ~ ~'§I~ Q "<:<. ", ~ '> ¡¡:~ 0 i5 ~:' ~.~O~ ~.. E ......- ~::: « OJ .... 8 ¡;¡ ~ ~ ~ -< š õi~ ......!! ~" " ..... Q .... ¡... ~ en-p¡:: § 0 u p¡:: Q 0 .~ ~ ¡;¡ ; u ~ 101 ~ ~~ ~ m[~ ß ,..s:: .'of. " 0 II . . . 0 0 ..O-.6l ! I I I -, I ..O-.6l c 0 .S . ~ ¡¡¡ q~¡¡ ~k;il ~ ~:¡, ~:t, ~¡¡¡¡! 0 ~ ~ .:J :I: u ~ [/) Z.. .. ¡¡,¡ § « ¡3 ], ~~~~ ~~ O~:I:ð .§ ~' :I: " ,.., .:. ~ ~~ ~~ « ¡¡¡ .... :I ¡¡¡.!! ¡¡'¡" « ~ ~o.~ ..... ] ~ e ..... .s ....~ 8 [/) ~ 8 0 ~ 0 .S . ~ ¡¡¡ i II) §i ~ .~~ I . 'î ¡¡.. ;; !::Ij! ~$. ð"'...~. z C¡¡t .. ;~~ . II)¡ .'1;, S ,.d ."0" " ~ ~ 0 I 0 0 Ei-,l~ i . i!! I 0 J : ' fi' d! ¡ - , ~ .2 Õ. 0 ~!¡ ~ I' Ii , . ~ g '" þ e 0 0 .:; d! ~m i i is i i ~ .2 Õ. 0 ----.~~ e 0 0 .;; d! 'ii . .2 Õ. 0 g ~ f ~ 0 -~ c i;,;;¡8 ~t¡1 â O¡F' ffi;~; ~¡~¡!! C :I: U 'A Z OS on .JI4 .- ~ . "'" C ~~ ~ ~ ¡¡O¡:¡~ ~:I:io . .!!<~::>~ ~~g<~ ""'Õll.." ..... - .... ¡... rn ~ 0 ~ JSi ð ~. 1"- i ~..ð"-..-. ~ I '.;Oß ~ ~H.~ ~ 0 ,I ATTACHMENT NO.2 PC RESOLUTION 2004-- R:\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4. PA03-0347\PC SR memo 1-7-04.doc 6 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0347 A PRODUCT REVIEW FOR DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 4A OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED SOUTH OF MURRIETA HOT SPRiNGS ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 957-340-001 TRACT MAP 29661-4. WHEREAS, Griffin Communities, filed Planning Application No.PA03-0347, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA03-0347 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA03-0347 on November 19, 2003 and on January 7, 2004 at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA03-0347; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA03-0347 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.01O.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Low Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Low Medium land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of the residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. R:IProduct RevieW\Roripaugh Ranch SPIGriffin Communilies Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\Resolution w CofA-1-7-04.doc 1 The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. . Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA03-0347 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162. This section applies when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified and there are not substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA03-0347 for a Product Review for detached single family residences within Planning Area 4A of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road, Assessor's Parcel No. 957-340-001, Tract Map 29661-4. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this ih day of January 2004. Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson . ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske. Secretary {SEAL} STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss. ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the ih day of January 2004, by the fu~~~ . AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary . R\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\Resolulion w CofA-1-7-04.doc 2 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\Produc\ RevleW\Roripaugh Ranch SPlGrlffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PAO3-o347\Resolution w CofA-1-7-04.doc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0347 (Product Review) Project Description: A Product Review for detached single family residences within Planning Area 4A of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road, Assessor's Parcel No. 957-340-001, Tract Map 29661-4. Assessor Parcel No.: 957-340-001 DIF Category: Per Development Agreement Approval Date: January 7,2004 Expiration Date: January 7,2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements 2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit R:IPraduct ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SPIGriffin Communilies Tr 29661-4, PA03-0347\Resolution w CofA-1-7-04.doc 4 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. . 3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by these changes. The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. . The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. All Mediterranean, Monterey, Craftsman and Ranch styles shall utilize a smooth to light texture stucco finish (20/30 aggregate or smoother) as determined acceptable by the Planning Director. The following revisions to the necessary elevations shall be revised as follows: . R:\Produc\ Review\Roripaugh Ranch SPIGriffin Communilies Tr 29661-4, PA03-0347\Resolution w CofA-1-7-04.doc 5 . . . A. PLAN ONE Elevation A - Mediterranean: a. Remove shutters and enlarge the arched window on front elevation. Add arched windows on the sides and rear elevations and remove shutters. b. Elevation B - Ranch: a. Wrap siding around the beginning of fence on left elevation. Elevation C - Craftsman: a. Revise venting to differ from the Ranch style. Provide shingle siding on side yard projections. Revise front window to a pediment style window. Revise rear elevation window to a pediment style window. Revise garage door style by providing a wood appearance and eliminating windows. b. c. d. e. B. PLAN TWO Elevation B - Ranch: a. Wrap siding around to beginning of fence on right elevation. Elevation C - Craftsman: a. Wrap the band around to the side from the porch to the garage. Revise venting to differ from the Ranch style. Revise rear elevation window(s) to a pediment style window to match front. Revise garage door style by providing a wood appearance and eliminating windows. b. c. d. Elevation D - Monterey: a. Extend front balcony to the edge of the residence above garage. b. Eliminate all shutters and provide additional arched windows on each elevation to match the front elevation. c. Revise vents to reflect a Monterey style and differ from other styles. Provide decorative windowsills on side and rear elevations. d. C. PLAN THREE Elevation A - Mediterranean: a. Provide additional arched windows on each elevation. R:IProduct ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SPIGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4. PA03-0347\Resolution w CofA-1-7-04.doc 6 D. b. Add decorative windowsills for all arched windows. . Elevation B - Ranch: a. Add decorative windowsill to rear elevation window on second story and on left elevation window above double-doors. Elevation C - Craftsman: a. Add pediment style windows on left elevation window above double doors and on second story of rear elevation. Revise shutters to reflect Craftsman style to differ from Ranch style. Revise garage door style by providing a wood appearance and eliminating windows b. c. PLAN FOUR Elevation B - Ranch: a. Provide decorative windowsills on rear and side elevations. Elevation C - Craftsman: a. Revise the rear window on the second elevation to a pediment style window. Provide matching stone veneer at the garage and wrap around side to beginning of fence. Revise garage door style by providing a wood appearance and eliminating windows 8 b. c. Elevation D - Monterey: a. Extend the balcony on the second story of the front elevation on the opposite side of the tower element to extend to the edge of the residence. Eliminate all shutters and provide additional arched windows on each elevation to match the front elevation along with decorative windowsills b. 13. Corner lot side yards shall have at least two street trees per the Specific Plan. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 14. The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 15. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for 16. . R:\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\Resolution w CofA-1-7-04.doc 7 . . . 17. their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. A street tree master plan indicating what tree species will be planted on each street shall be submitted. The plan should graphically show the locations of all trees. One tree species per street shall be provided. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, conditions of approval for Tract Map 29353 (PA01-0230, A-Map), Tract Map 29661 (PA01-0253, B-Map), and Ordinance No. 02-14, the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, including, but not limited to attachment "5", which requires various on and off-site improvements. The applicant shall submit street lighting and signage plans to the Planning Director for final approval. Street lighting shall comply with the specific plan, Riverside County Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance, and the mitigation-monitoring program. Said lighting shall comply with the standards as set forth in the Mitigated Monitoring Program and install hoods or shields to prevent either spillage of lumens or reflections into the sky (lights must be downward facing). The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. Prior to issuance of any residential building permit within Planning Area 4A, the construction landscape and architectural plans for Paseos (including hardscaping, landscaping, fencing, lights and gates), Paseo gates Staff Gated Primary Entry, Card Key Entry, fuel modification zones shall be submitted and approved Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings within private common areas for a period of one year, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from the completion of the landscaping. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans, plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved. The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director that all homes will have double paned windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to R:\Product ReviswlRoripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\Resoiution w CofA-1-7-04.doc 8 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recycled through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Services Department. . All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of any construction or inspections. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed by an appropriate registered professional. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94- 21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays . Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 35. 36. 37. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. . R:\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4. PAO3-0347\Resolution w CofA-1-7-04.doc 9 . . . 38. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 39. The developer shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. 40. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Name Printed R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communilies Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\Resolution w CofA-1-7-04.doc 10 ATTACHMENT NO.3 SUMMARY MATRIX, DATED DECEMBER 17M 2003 R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PA03-0347\PC SR memo 1-7.04.doc 9 . . . Tract # 29661-4 "CASA DIAMANTE" at Rorlpaugh Ranch Summary Table Sheet mŒ@ŒDWŒrïìì lJU DEC 1 7 2003 ~ By Lot# Lot Square Hardscape Footprint Footage Coverage Square Hardscape Hardscape Size Footage Coverage Option Plan Type 36 2,435 44 Tract # 29661-4 "CASA DIAMANTE" at . Rorlpaugh Ranch Summary Table Sheet Lot Square Hardscape Hardscape Hardscape Lot # Plan Type Footprint Footage Coverage Square Size Footage Coverage Option 42 1C 41% 589 10% 2 1I1~:r3 ~.!81j! Ir_~';¡¡11111 ~Fi7J- 1i1~. v 44 3A 40% 431 7% 1 -45 jJ~ ¡r~1.eB -"SW. 1).___95 f~..?I. 'ft 46 1A 42% 572 10% 3 ~'P1~~. 89 3~~~" -,,2?1.- ~1T' 48 4D 38% 515 7% 2 ~¡¡ 313:1:1 - 26S. - ~~5n¡6- 5?¡. l' I 50 38 414 4% 3 52 28 2,231 8,819 25% 640 7% 1 "'3 .;;:æ.B ~'43,~ ¡¡'¡'1i8i1 i-3i<1~.. ,.e.4Fft ,.'7. .. 54 4D 2,688 7,057 38% 555 8% 3 IIIl11:?, "'89 2~'4u 171.05'1: .~!iì(.'¡ L 8S- 8~¡, m 56 2D 2,231 7,057 32% 691 10% 2 ".. ,,8t1 2'.688 7,{Ð5" n8W. -55:> 8Jr. -, . 58 2D 2,231 7,057 32% 674 10% 3 ¡ï!II ~rœr1¡œli! ';I~5'40 J1fl959J 1!~6f'Í"'~.iIf6'.40 9Pl. ; I ~ 60 28 2,231 7,057 32% 691 10% 2 ¡n 6n ,,!!II:I "~68ft -'ßRft a6~" I~ -- ft?. ~ 62 18R 2,540 8,427 30% 623 7% 3 64 2DR 2,231 6,149 36% 657 11% 2 60 ".. 2~68R 51'3911 0;0)';. l]jr."~,,, ILO.' v 66 2CR 2,231 5,356 42% 606 11% 2 6j a .. 68 1AR 2,540 5,356 487 9% 2 6 . 70 3AR 431 8% 2 72 3AR 414 7% 3 6 74 1C 7,944 32% 572 7% 2 9 . 76 3C 42% 480 8% 1 ~i7. --t!)9 ,,81'1. ~'-1i40 IlIiI',. 2 78 1A 43% 521 9% 3 80 4D 31% 579 7% 2 B 82 3C 7,874 31% 550 7% . ~ !Ii! "iii (,,0119 381'1. -..49<1 7if. . . . Tract # 29661-4 "CASA DIAMANTE" at Rorlpaugh Ranch Summary Table Sheet LoU Lot Square Hardscape Hardscape Hardscape Footprint Footage Coverage Square Coverage Option Size Footage Plan Type ATTACHMENT NO.4 LIGHTING R:\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PA03-o347\PC SR memo 1-7-04.doc 10 . A ELEV A nON "MEDITERRANEAN" B ELEVATION "RANCH" "CASA DIAMANTE" TYPICAL EXTERIOR LIGHTING . D ELEVATION "MONTEREY" . ATTACHMENT NO.5 NOVEMBER 19, 2003 PLANNING COMMISION STAFF REPORT R:\ProducIRevieW\Roripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PA03-0347\PC SR memo 1-7-04.doc 11 . . . Date of Meeting: Prepared by: File Number STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION November 19, 2003 Dan Long Title: Associate Planner PA03-0347 Project Description: Recommendation: Application Type: Product Review Planning Application No. PA03-0347, submitted by Griffin Communities, is a product review for 100 detached single family residences within Planning Area 4A of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road (APN: 957- 340-001 ). Plan 1, single story 1,972 square feet (22 units): -Mediterranean (9 units) -Craftsman (7 units) -Ranch (6 units) Plan 2, two story 2,231 - 2,562 square feet (28 units): -Craftsman (7 units) -Ranch (9 units) -Monterey (12 units) Plan 3, two story 2,435 - 2,591 square feet (21 units) -Mediterranean (8 units) -Craftsman (7 units) -Ranch (5 units) Plan 4, two story, 2,688 - 2,871 square feet (29 units) -Craftsman (9 units) -Ranch (7 units) -Monterey (13 units) ~ Approve with Conditions 0 Deny 0 Continue for Redesign 0 Continue to: 0 Recommend Approval with Conditions 0 Recommend Denial RolProd"ct ReviewIRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffiu Commuoities Tr 29661-4, PAO3-0347\NEW STAFF REPORT-lAdoc 1 CEQA: ~ Categorically Exempt (Class) 15162 . 0 Negative Declaration 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan OEIR PROJECT DATA SUMMARY: Applicant: Jim Teegarden, Griffin Communities Completion Date: June 24, 2003 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: January 28, 2004 General Plan Designation: Low Medium Residential (LM) Zoning Designation: Low Medium Residential (LM) SP-11, Roripauh Ranch Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: Single family Residential (Riverside County) . South: Very Low Density Residential (VL) East: Vacant West: Vacant Lot Area: 5,000 sq. ft. minimum (6,590 average lot size) Total Floor Area/Ratio N/A Landscape Area/Coverage N/A Parking Required/Provided 2 covered enclosed spaces (20' x 20') BACKGROUND SUMMARY: ~1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. 01. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff. . R,'Pmduct ReviewIRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Comm"nitie, T, 29661-4\NEW STAFF REPORT-IA.doc 2 . . . ANALYSIS Architectural Review: The project proposes four (4) floor plans and four (4) architectural styles that are consistent with the Residential Architectural Guidelines found in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Section 4.10 and meets the purpose of the Guidelines. The applicant has chosen the option of Design Group E (pg. 4-97) from the specific plan, which allows the use of one style from the design groups A-D. The applicant has chosen to use two architectural styles (Craftsman and Ranch) on all four floor plans; while using a third architectural style (Mediterranean) on two floor plans (plans 1 and 3) and a fourth architectural style (Monterey) on the remaining two floor plans (plans 2 and 4). This concept is consistent with the design guidelines of the specific plan and allows for additional variety within the planning area. The various materials and features proposed include the following for each architectural style: . Mediterranean: Sand finish stucco and trim, furred-out stucco base, Mediterranean style shutters and chimney shape and shroud, wrought iron grill, decorative window-sills, concrete "S" tile roof, eave detail at gable ends, Mediterranean entry and garage door, Mediterranean style trim and grids at windows, arched colonnade at porches, and deep recessed windows and doors. Ranch: Wood trim and siding, cultured stream stone veneer accents, wood post and beam porch supports, wood outlookers at gable ends, Ranch style shutters, chimney cap and shroud, wood pot-shelves, shake style concrete flat tile roof, Ranch style entry and garage door, and Ranch style trim and grids at windows. Craftsman: Shake style wood siding and wood trim, cultured stacked/ledge stone veneer accents, wood knee braces, slate style concrete flat tile roof, Craftsman style shutters, entry door and garage door, Craftsman style trim and grids at windows, dominant gable element, and battered column detail. . Monterey: Sand finish stucco and trim, furred-out stucco base, shake style concrete flat roof, wrought iron railing at decks and porches, exposed rafter tails, decorative tile vents, Monterey style entry door and garage door, Monterey style chimney and decorative shroud, Monterey style trim and grids at windows, wood post, beam and corbel detail at decks and Monterey style shutters. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan requires articulation on all sides of the homes ("Four-sided Architecture"). Each side of each product provides specific features of the proposed architecture style. The applicant has provided specific details, which are unique to each style proposed on each elevation, including door and window types, window and door trim, garage door design including windows, materials such as siding, stone, shingles, roof type and shape, shutters and the overall silhouette. The applicant has proposed at least one of each plan to include a varied silhouette in order to provide a varied look from each side. The applicant has included various one-story elements into the two story products by incorporating steps in the plane, gables, first- floor projections and second story setbacks. In addition, the applicant avoided the "canyon- effecf' by incorporating these elements and carefully plotting of each plan (setbacks and mixing of each plan). R,lProduct ReviewIRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Comm"uities Tr 29661-4\NEW STAFF REPORT-1A.doc 3 The applicant has provided main entries that standout as the clear focal point of the front elevation with the use of covered entries, courtyards, double doors, and by bringing the living space forward as opposed to garage dominated frontages. The applicant has complied with the 50% architectural forward concept. Plan 1 and 2 propose architectural forward products and there are a total of 50 plan 1 and 2 products proposed through out planning area 4A. The applicant has proposed plan 1 and 3 for all corner lots, with the exception of lot 27, which is a plan 4. The applicant has proposed a "special" side elevation for lot 27, which includes a ranch style with a stone projection to add interest from the street. A typical corner elevation for plan 1 and 3 has been proposed. Plan 1 includes a low wall extending from the front courtyard and wrapping around to the side, which provides for an enlarged outdoor courtyard. Plan 3 also includes a low wall, however it is a freestanding wall that includes a decorative wood trellis on top of the wall. Each wall and trellis includes features unique to the architectural style. The side elevation for plan 3 maintains a courtyard with double doors into the courtyard area and a stepped back second story to reduce the mass along the street side. Also, the fences on the corner lots have been pulled back towards the rear of the residences, which exposes the side elevation, further enhancing the street scene and stressing a second front elevation. Of the two architectural forward products, plan 1 includes a shallow recessed garage setback 8 feet from the front facade and plan 2 includes a mid to deep recessed garage setback 14'-8' from the front facade. In addition to the recessed garages, the applicant has proposed, tandem garages and split door (plan 4) garages to meet the intent of Section 10.4.3 Architectural Forward Standards. Product Placement: The proposed product placement meets the Residential Architectural Guidelines of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan in that the applicant has incorporated the architectural enhancements on all four elevations. The careful plotting (setbacks) and single story elements on two-story products will avoid the canyon effect, which is required in the specific plan. Also, there is no style or plans located side by side more than 3 in a row. Single Story: The specific plan states "The requirement for one-story products shall be determined by the market or as determined by staff as long as some single story products are required in the single family detached areas." The applicant has provided one single story product (floor plan 1), which makes up 22 of the 100 residences. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 01. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class, name, type) [g 1. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved (Negative Declaration) (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). 01. An initial study has been prepared and indicates that the project will have the following potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as conditions of approval. Based on the following mitigations, staff recommends adoption of the mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. R,IPwduct ReviewIRurip."gh Ranch SPlGriffiu Comm"uities Tr 29ó61-4\NEW STAFF REPORT-! A.doc 4 . . . . . . CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDA TION: Based on the analysis summarized in this report, staff has determined that the findings required for approval can be made with the attached recommended Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Low Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Low Medium land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. PC Resolution of Approval with Conditions of Approval Attached - Blue Page 6 Summary Matrix - Blue Page 7 Plan Reductions - Blue Page 8 Lighting - Blue Page 9 Architectural Description - Blue Page 10 Roripaugh Ranch Design Guidelines (excerpt) - Blue Page 11 R,lProd"ct ReviewIRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4\NEW STAFF REPORT-1Adoc 5 ATTACHMENT NO.1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-- R:\Product ReviewIRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4\NEW STAFF RBPORT-1 Adoc 6 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0347 A PRODUCT REVIEW FOR DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 4A OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED SOUTH OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 957-340-001 TRACT MAP 29661-4. WHEREAS, Griffin Communities, filed Planning Application No.PA03-0347, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA03-0347 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA03-0347 on November 19, 2003 at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA03-0347; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA03-0347 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Low Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Low Medium land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of the residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4\Resolution w CofA.doc 1 The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. . Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA03-0347 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162. This section applies when an Environmental Impact Report (ErR) has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent ErR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA03-0347 for a Product Review for detached single family residences within Planning Area 4A of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road, Assessor's Parcel No. 957-340-001, Tract Map 29661-4. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of November 2003. . Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary {SEAL} STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2003-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of T emecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of November, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary . R:\Product Revlew\Roripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4\Resolution w ColA.doc 2 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:IProduct Review\Roripaugh Ranch SPIGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4lRasolution w ColAdoc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No, PA03-0347 (Product Review) Project Description: A Product Review for detached single family residences within planning area 4A of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road, Assessor's Parcel No. 957-340-001, Tract Map 29661-4. Assessor Parcel No.: 957-340-001 Approval Date: November 19, 2003 Expiration Date: November 19, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements 2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit R:\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4\Resoiution w CofA.doc 4 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 3. once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. . 4. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by these changes. The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. 5. 6. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. . Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. All Mediterranean, Monterey, Craftsman and Ranch styles shall utilize a smooth to light texture stucco finish (20/30 aggregate or smoother) as determined acceptable by the Planning Director. . R:\Produc\ RevieW\Roripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4\Resolution w CofA.doc 5 . . . Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 12. The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. 13. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 14. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, conditions of approval for Tract Map 29353 (PA01-0230, A-Map), Tract Map 29661 (PA01-0253, B-Map), and Ordinance No. 02-14, the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, including, but not limited to attachment "5", which requires various on and off-site improvements. The applicant shall submit street lighting and signage plans to the Planning Director for final approval. Street lighting shall comply with the specific plan, Riverside County Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance, and the mitigation-monitoring program. Said lighting shall comply with the standards as set forth in the Mitigated Monitoring Program and install hoods or shields to prevent either spillage of lumens or reflections into the sky (lights must be downward facing). The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. Prior to issuance of any residential building permit within Planning Area 4A, the construction landscape and architectural plans for Paseos (including hardscaping, landscaping, fencing, lights and gates), Paseo gates Staff Gated Primary Entry, Card Key Entry, fuel modification zones shall be submitted and approved Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings within private common areas for a period of one year, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from the completion of the landscaping. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released. R:\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4\Resolution w ColA.doc 6 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 21. . Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans, plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved. 22. The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director that all homes will have double paned windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. 23. The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recycled through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Services Department. 24. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 25. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of any construction or inspections. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. . Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed by an appropriate registered professional. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94- 21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 32. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. . R:\Product Review\Rorlpaugh Ranch SP\Griffln Communities Tr 29661-4\Resolutlon w ColA.doc 7 . . . 37. 33. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 34. 35. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 36. The developer shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date Name printed R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr 29661-4\Resolution w ColA.doc 8 ATTACHMENT NO.2 SUMMARY MATRIX R:lProduct ReviewIRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities 1'r 29661-4\NEW STAFFREPORT-1A.doc 7 . Tract # 29661-4 "CASA DIAMANTE" at Roripaugh Ranch Summary Table Sheet Lot Square Hardscape Hardscape Hardscape Lot # Plan Type Footprint Footage Coverage Square Coverage Option Size Footage 2 3AR 2,435 5,475 44% 436 8% 4 1AR 2,540 5,695 45% 521 9% 2 6 4DR 2,688 5,475 49% 535 10% 3 8 1BR 2,540 5,694 45% 504 9% 10 3AR 2,435 5,475 44% 448 8% 2 12 4B 2,688 6,214 43% 555 9% 3 . 14 3AR 2,435 5,878 41% 440 7% 16 3B 2,435 7,253 34% 431 6% 3 18 1AR 2,540 5,785 44% 487 8% 2 20 2C 2,231 5,785 39% 606 10% 22 1BR 2,540 5,589 45% 487 9% 3 24 2D 2,231 5,590 40% 606 11% 2 26 1CR 2,540 6,959 36% 572 8% 28 3B 2,435 8,313 29% 448 5% 2 30 1BR 2,540 6,183 41% 572 9% 3 32 3B 2,435 6,183 39% 448 7% 34 1AR 2,540 6,183 41% 576 9% 2 . 36 48 2,688 6,708 40% 495 7% 3 38 1C 2,540 8,037 32% 606 8% . Tract # 29661-4 "CASA DIAMANTE" at Roripaugh Ranch Summary Table Sheet Lot Square Hardscape Hardscape Hardscape Lot # Plan Type Footprint Footage Coverage Square Coverage Option Size Footage 40 2C 2,231 6,132 36% 657 11% 3 42 1C 2,540 6,132 41% 589 10% 2 44 3A 2,435 6,132 40% 431 7% 46 1A 2,540 6,021 42% 572 10% 3 48 4D 2,688 6,990 38% 515 7% 2 50 3B 2,435 9,766 25% 414 4% 3 52 2B 2,231 8,819 25% 640 7% . 54 4D 2,688 7,057 38% 555 8% 3 56 2D 2,231 7,057 32% 691 10% 2 58 2D 2,231 7,057 32% 674 10% 3 60 2B 2,231 7,057 32% 691 10% 2 62 1BR 2,540 8,427 30% 623 7% 3 64 2DR 2,231 6,149 36% 657 11% 2 66 2CR 2,231 5,356 42% 606 11% 2 68 1AR 2,540 5,356 47% 487 9% 2 70 3AR 2,435 5,356 45% 431 8% 2 72 3AR 2,435 6,330 38% 414 7% 3 74 1C 2,540 7,944 32% 572 7% 2 76 3C 2,435 5,830 42% 480 8% . . Tract # 29661-4 "CASA OIAMANTE" at Roripaugh Ranch Summary Table Sheet Lot Square Hardscape Hardscape Hardscape Lot # Plan Type Footprint Footage Coverage Square Coverage Option Size Footage 78 1A 2,540 5,843 43% 521 9% 3 80 4D 2,688 8,617 31% 579 7% 2 82 3C 2,435 7,874 31% 550 7% 85 2A 2,231 5,088 44% 657 13% 3 87 4CR 2,688 6,634 41% 575 9% 3 89 4DR 2,688 6,907 39% 535 8% 91 2DR 2,231 6,703 33% 657 10% 3 . 93 1AR 2,540 6,696 38% 504 8% 2 95 40R 2,688 6,955 39% 535 8% 97 20 2,231 7,123 31% 606 9% 3 99 2BR 2,231 7,620 29% 691 9% 2 101 3AR 2,435 8,094 30% 448 6% 3 . ATTACHMENT NO.3 PLAN REDUCTIONS R,lProduct ReviewIRoripaugh Ranch SP\Griffin Communities Tr29661-4\NEW STAFFREPORT-1A.doc 8 ~ 'RORJ:PAUGH RANCH ~ ~"""" TRACT 29661-4 .... ~'" CITY OF TEMECULA ~,,"", PLOT PLAN :!!>,. , "" ~~" ~ '.... ~ '",- :--- '" =-= =-= =-= ".;:: , ~ t oc f f' b . .~-. . -..---- .----.--..-.....------.---------- .... .---. . APPUCANT: ...... CIOMJIIIID '" .. UNCOUI .... """'" ""'" -""- PH. (000) -.,234 ENGINEER: --- ""'......... INC. 2100 ..... """"'. ..... A-4GO -""..- ..... (801) _""00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ""'" ....,... If.[f,~~~ -. ~ -. -. -. ~ M ..., ...., -= T.o .,;:;r "'" ~......, """"'AIOOI1Ð:I\.OW.""""" ..........,"""""'_....... ....~ ...., '~r":- . 8 ron--on , c- , , ¡ .... -___--_--rJ c:;==-==-,;, on__--onrr-- r-- : I h ~ I i i II ~ I ~I u III ~ 0' ~j,3p ~ p. 'I' ~IJJI i . I,t i~ II z « ,..¡ '" '" i r z ~ U ... '" . ~! 0 II. III '" « JU t,) '" Q ..: iír- « ~ II :>: ~ ~~ . ;¡;¡: j - <I \Q ;t d,I~1 \Q Q'I ~ ¡RUlli <'I ;11 jUL ø:: E-< . ¡ æ j II:: I!i II ! u z -II! ¡pm!- « ø:: ~B ~ -_ud ~¡ ~ð «. . ~j OJ/] ø::1i I I' ,!I! ¡Ii ¡!I! ¡,llf I IIIII ¡fill Iii!!,' ¡IIII' i II, 'Iii I I I ,¡Iii lilliUI ¡ 111111 ¡ilm . all .~ Ii¡ --, I' I Ii I I ~ II! II ¡III ~ II II I 111111 !!¡III I¡~; ¡ - [;1B 111111 a! !Hi I " 'II ,I, II Ii I ill ~II i ! Ii Iii ~:! n ¡II 15 j 8 ð ~ "'" ~q ..: ;¡;I \0 <I \0 0- N ~ E-< ::Ii t) Z < ~. ~~ J ¡:~ ~ ~< ~ ~ j ~ ~ Hn JI .. '" i . ~ CJ~,:.....' ~ iiJ . It It It . ef ~ n ¡Iii ~ ~ if i ~III~:~ .ill! ><1'11 ~ ¡;¡ Ii" f-o 'Iq ~l!JI i "i . <I ri L_-- _h____- :g¡ . '" a '<t ~~ , ;;:¡ :; < '" 0\ ZN < ~ P:: '" E-< .... ",:I:: "'U ~Z u -< ~P:: Z ~ :I:: 1 '" e:> t: ~::>8 '" -< . .. ø..! ~ ;2 J '"' 0" ~ ~ ~ . . . . tt) î - W J ¡il ~ ~hlî ~ ¡..oJ.!! ;¡\ Z ')1 ~ jfJ ! I ! ! . . . . . . ...., ~~ ...¡ ~ ~<I \0 0'1 ;Z; N « "'~ ~ t-< !::J:I: :U "z ~ < ~~ ~ J:I: 1 '" Ö t ~;:Jð '" < . .. p.. .1 o'<!...... 9 "' ~ 8 ~O,g .. ~. 6 WALL & FENCE DETAILS RORIPAUGH RANCH TR 29661-4 GriffinCommuni... - CityofT- 7-1&<13 4>9-15-03 . PRIVACY FENCING AT FRONT OF HOMES .,~ 0 ~ ~~':~~_~PIl.ASTERS "'~ CD . ~~.~~ - WOOD .u CD ~A.;;.~~ SLOPE TRANS:m:ON "'~ CD I ==. ~::=mïIIIü' ~~NCE .,~ 0 LANTEX ---- ..:.,'1:::..~== "'" LW-3 '" 3 . . . . GRIFFIN COMMUNITIES Casa Diamante EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEDULE rEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 10, 2003 Tattersall Brown 8243M Tattersall Brown 8243M Smokebush 8626N NA Amber Waves Amber Waves Wilderness Green NA Ranch 4 4502 1/2X-12 7270W 001 001 8626N Saginaw 1B Slate Chablis Filtered Light White White Wildemess Green River Rock 2B 5 4634 X-40 8161W 001 001 8556A Sonoma 3B Slate Dove Grey Sulphur Springs White White Peking Blue River Rock 4B 6 4602 1/2X-40 8511W 001 001 8526A American Slate Dove Grey Snowcloud White White Dark Colossus River Rock .aftsma 7 5529 1/2X-16 86350 8634M 001 8636N Saratoga 1C Shake Silver Grey Mansard Stone Dusty Miller White Old Proch Rustic Ledge 2C 8 5678 X-73 87040 87650 001 8586A Saddleback 3C Shake Eggshell Stratford Brown Beaver Creek White Metropolis Rustic Ledge 4C 9 8803 1/2X-17 87050 82350 001 8706N Durango Shake Misty Barn Rafter Brush Box White Saddlebury Mountain Ledge IOTE: See color keyed elevations for areas to be painted such as trim, accent stucco, front doors, and shutters. AGLE ROOFING/LA HABRA STUCCO/FRAZEE PAINTS/ELOORAOO STONE Install Shake roof on "0" elevations only. ATTACHMENT NO.4 LIGHTING R:\Product ReviewIRoripaugb Ranch SPlGriffin Commuoities Tr 29661-4\NEW STAFFREPORT-1A.doc 9 . A ELEVATION "MEDITERRANEAN" !! ELEVATION "RANCH" JlCASA DIAMANTE" TYPICAL EXTERIOR LIGHTING . D ELEVATION "MONTEREY" . ATTACHMENT NO.5 ARCHITECTURAL DESCRiPTION R,lProduct ReviewIRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4\NEW STAFF REPORT-IA.doc 10 . ~ v KTGY GROUP, INC. Architecture Plannln9 17992 Mitchell South Irvine, California 92614 949/851-2133 FAX 949/851-5156 The following is a description of elements that establish the various architectUral styles/themes requested by the City of Temecula to include in the Planning Application P AO3-0347 for Roripaugh Ranch. . Mediterranean . Sand Finish Stucco and Trim . Furred Out Stucco Base . Decorative Mediterranean Style Shutters . Mediterranean Style Chimney shape with Decorative Shroud . 2" Recess with Wrought Iron Grill detail at Gables . Enhanced Decorative Sill detail . Concrete'S' Tile Roof . Enhanced Eave Detail at Gable Ends . Mediterranean Style Garage Door with Glazing . Mediterranean Style Entry Door . Mediterranean Style Trim & Grids at Windows . . Pronounced Arched Colonnade at Porches . Deep Recessed Windows & Doors Ranch . Wood Trim & Siding . Cultured Stream Stone Veneer Accents . Wood Post & Beam Porch Supports . Wood Outlookers at Gables . Ranch Style Decorative Shutters . Ranch Style Chimney & Decorative Shroud . Wood Potshelf . Shake Style Concrete Flat Tile Roof . Ranch Style Garage Door with Glazing . Ranch Style Entry Door . Ranch Style Trim & Grids at Windows . Craftsman . Shake Style Wood Siding & Wood Trim . Cultured Stacked/Ledge Stone Veneer Accents . Wood Knee-braces . Slate Style Concrete Flat Tile Roof . Craftsman Style Decorative Shutters . Craftsman Style Entry Door . Craftsman Style Garage Door with Glazing . . Craftsman Style Trim & Grids at Windows . Dominant Gable Element . Battered Column Detail Monterey . Shake Style Concrete Flat Roof . Sand Finish Stucco & Trim . Furred Out Stucco Base . Wrought Iron Railing at Decks & Porches . Exposed Rafter Tails . Decorative Tile Vent Detail at Gables . Monterey Style Entry Door . Monterey Style Garage Door . Monterey Style Chimney & Decorative Shroud . Monterey Style Trim & Grids at Windows . Wood Post, Beam & Corbel Detail at Decks . Monterey Style Decorative Shutters . . ATTACHMENT NO.6 RORIPAUGH RANCH DESIGN GUIDELINES (EXCERPT) RlProductReviewIRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffiu Conununities Tr 2%61-4\NEW STAFFREPORT-IA.doc 11 . (¡ 8' 8) ASHBY USA, llC FIGURE 4-48 CALIFORNIA RANCH Inspiration Photo: Design features: . Covered front porch . Steeper roof pitches - Flat tile or shingle roofing - Multi-pane windows - Wood/vinyl siding - Dormer shapes facing street The Keith c.mp.nie1~C "aT TO SO.AlE -- I. H () J 'il):I Iud) It 11 1 ell ..c. r ~I ~f 0- ~ c: ;; s... ž J2! :=1 co ~, 0; " i! ~ ~ j ASHayUSA, LLC . . FIGURE 4-52 CRAFTSMAN ( -") Inspiration Photo: Design feature.s: - Low pitched gable end roofs - Stone veneer accents - Exposed beam and rafter tails - Grouped wood columns - Wood picket railings - Multi-pane windows - Trellis beam detailing ,. ", Th, K,;'h com""n;'1-r1<.C ~'~ 'CA"~ . ItII1!'!l l?()l.j¡){lll,fl,-]l I \1:" ~f O!í ~ z ¡; is i5 ~, ... ~ ~ ; !i I . . _. 8Y ., ASHBY USA, llC FIGURE 4-56 MEDITERRANEAN Ct ~I t::J (])& :t:: ~ "'C~ (])~ ~~ ~, ¡ i ~ ~ I J Inspiration Photo: Pesign features: - Arched Focal Points - Stucco window surrounds . Bullnose band details - Barrel Ii Ie roofing - Ceramic tile accents - Trellis beam de1ails - Multi-pane windows - Wrou9ht iron delails The Ke;'h com..n;'ï-w-J<.C '-.:- T. 0 . C A L .~. 1~()61 );¡ ¡ 1~1¡ H;lll ell ASHBY ÙMllH FIGURE 4-58 r-\ \ oJ 1'--'-- V.J MONTEREY Inspiration Photo: The Ke;th c"mpen;eï"T1<:C ~TO .CAL~ R()1'jl)al(~11 Design features: - Arched focal point - Deep recessed openings - Mufti-pane windows - Exposed rafter tails - Wood picket railings - Wrought iron detailing - Spanish tile roof . . . 8 - DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 4,10.1 Introduction These design guidelines will be utilized to direct the future physical development of Roripaugh Ranch, an 804.7-acre, mixed-use development currently located in the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside. In order to create a unique community structure, these community guidelines provide a framework for site planning, the architectural theme and landscaping relating to the project. The purpose of these guidelines is to assure a high quality community character and land use compatibility. 4.10.2 Purpose It is the intent of these guidelines to provide direction on a project-wide level as well as a planning area and site-specific level. For example, the guidelines establish criteria at the project level to assure a unified environment, while the planning area and site-specific level individual projects will be required to comply with relevant design standards applicable to each use. Although each project should relate to the overall community design theme, these guidelines are not intended to limit innovative design. The use of these guidelines will serve to direct the overall design of Roripaugh Ranch and assure a high quality community character, appearance and land use compatibility. The City of Temecula city staff, Planning Commission, City Council, and other City decision-making bodies will be providing direction when reviewing development projects within Roripaugh Ranch. These guidelines will also serve as design criteria for use by planners, architects, landscape arcMects, engineers, builders and future property owners. They will provide a viable framework and clear direction during the development process, without limiting innovative design. The resuit will be a community with a strong sense of identity, character and cohesiveness. 4.10.3 Residential Architectural Standards 4.10.3.1 Design Groups The intent of these guidelines is to encourage architectural style diversity between the adjacent residential planning areas. Each builder is required to contact the City Planning Department to discuss and review any established facade styles in adjacent Planning Areas so as to assist in the selection of subsequent styles. Each Planning Area shall be composed of one of the following Exterior Facade Design Groups (Groups A through E) consisting of different Architectural Styles. Within each Residential Planning Area Design Group selected, a minimum of two architectural styles and a maximum of four styles shall be used. Each style as noted in this section shall have a minimum of four-color variations for each Residential Planning Area. No more than four of the same archi1ectural styles may be placed next to one another. Desion Group A (All Planning Areas) I. II. III. IV. Classical Revival (See Figure 4-49) Spanish Revival (See Figure 4-60) Prairie (See Figure 4-59) California Ranch (See Figure 4-48) Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan , . N:\31367'000ldod\SPSect44CCAdo¡:>ted.doc ' , 4-96 , March.,~OO3, , .' DESIGN GUIDELINES Desian Group B (All Planning Areas) I. II. III. IV. . Colonial (See Figure 4-50) French Cottage (See Figure 4-54) East Coast Traditional (See Figure 4-53) Monterey (See Figure 4-58) Desian Grouo C (Planning Areas 10, 19, 20, 21, 33A and 33B only) I. II. III. Mediterranean (See Figure 4-56) American Farmhouse (See Figure 4-47) Contemporary Southwest (See Figure 4-51) Desian Group D (Planning Areas 10, 19, 20, 21, 33A and 33B only) I. II. III. Italianate (See Figure 4-55) Mission (See Figure 4-57) Craftsman (See Figure 4-52) Desian Group E (Acceptable for all Planning Areas) One style from each of the above groups. All merchant builders shall submit plans which identity unique aspects of each style to the City for approval' that include text, exhibits and any other materials deemed necessary by the City indicating how the proposed. residences will conform with the archilectural styles shown in the exhibits 4.47-61 listed in Design Groups A through E, and all other design requirements of this chapter. 4.10.3.2 Submittal and Review Requirements . The following materials shall be submitted for review and confonnance to the Architectural Guidelines and Specific Plan for the Roripaugh Ranch. The Planning Director may choose to require additional materials for review. Color elevations of all four sides at scale of ]4" = 1'. Show materials and colors. Provide dimensions of height and width of major elements. Indicate features that would bring elevation design into compliance with the Architectural Design Guidelines and the specific requirements of the Design Groups (Figures 4-47 through 4-60). Sections through each elevation at 14" = 1'. Indicate pitch of roof, extent of overhangs, recess of doors and windows and posilion of trim, trellis and other major architectural features in relation to the primary face of the residence. Site Plan at 1/8' = 1'. Show, in color and with dimensions the areas and type of paving, area and type of landscaping, fencing, site walls, and other site appurtenances. Indicate how the paving and landscaping is consistent with the Architectural Guidelines and specific requirements of the Design Groups (Figures 4-47 through 4-60). Provide by separate sheet, a matrix indicating the percentage of lot coverage, percentage of impervious paved area and percentage of landscaping. Provide a color and materials board of a minimal 18" x 18" size. Indicate all colors and materials as shown on the color elevations. Provide one board with one reduced color elevation to indicate confonnance with the color variety required by the Architectúral Design Guidelines and specific requirements of the Design Group (Figures 4-47 through 4-60). . ') . Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan . N'\31367,OOOldod\SPSect44CCAdopted.doc . . 4-97 March;'2003' ',. 81 (-~) . . DESIGN GUIDELINES Provide two color sets of the above at the scales indicated including a duplicate set of the color and materials board. In addition, provide six (6) sets of the above in reduced, 11" x 17" black and white format. 4.10.3.3 Architecture Forward and Garage Standards The following standards shall apply to all residential Planning Areas, except as specified: "Architectural Forward" concept shall be incorporated into 100% of the homes in Planning Areas10, 19,20,21, and 33A. "Architectural Forward" concept shall be incorporated into at least 50% of the homes in each of Planning Areas 1A, 2, 3, 4A, 48,12,14,15,16,17,18,22, 23,24, and 31. This concept includes advancing the architecture of the living space forward on the lot while concurrently, the garage is held in place or further recessed. Residential dwelling unils shall be designed to allow the living portion of the dwelling unit to be "positioned" forward on 1he lot so that the architecture of the garage will not dominate the street scene. A variety of garage placement solutions shall be incorporated into the overall design of the homes. Minimum driveway length from the property line to the garage door shall be eighteen feet (18') for front-entry garages in all Planning Areas and ten feet (10') from the property line to the garage edge for side entry garages in the land lM Districts. Garage solutions that should be incorporated into the overall design are as follows: Shallow Recessed Garaaes (See Figure 4-62) Setting the garage back a minimum of eight feet (8') in relationship to the front of the house. Mid to Deep Recessed Garaaes (See Figure 4-63) Setting the garage back to the middle or rear of the lot. Third Car Side loaded (See Figure 4-64) Setting for garage with side-loaded entry. This plan can only occur on larger lots. Side Entrv Garaaes (See FIgure 4-65) The use of side entry garages on lots at least 52 feet wide in order to break the continuous view of garage doors along the street scene. . Third Car Tandem (See Figure 4-66) Setting for third car tandem garage. Sinale Width Drivewavs (See Figure 4-67) This setting provides a maximum driveway width of twelve (12) feet for adjacent two-car garage. Porte Cochere (See Figure 4-68) Setting provides for the incorporation of a porte cochere. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan . . N:131367.oo0Idod\SPSect44CCAdopted,doc 4-98 March. 2003 DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10.3.5 Building Elevations A key technique for creating a sense of variety within a project is to vary the heights and fonns of the detached homes as seen from the street as illustrated in Figure 4-70 by utilizing the following: . Within low and low Medium density Planning Areas, utilize both one- and two-story buildings. To improve the visual relationship between adjacent buildings, it is desirable to introduce intermediate transition between them. Use a one-story architectural element within the two- story building to lessen its apparent height. Create varying rooflines by maximizing offsets of roof planes. Units located at street corners (see Figure 4-70), should be either single-story or have a significant one-story mass located towards the exterior side yard. Treatment of Mass Avoid a canyon-like effect between buildings and allow greater light penetration into what otherwise might be dark side-yards. At interior side yards, it is required to create the appearance of increased building separation by stepping the second story mass away from the property line or any other substantial articulation. Provide trims around windows, to break up the wall plane. Avoid long uninterrupted exterior walls. Vary the depth of plans to create variations in the building façade. . Two story homes shall be modified to be compatible with placement on comer lots. The modification shall create two front elevations. Surface detail, ornament and architectural elements such as cornices, color contrast, gables applied moldings, arcades, colonnades, stairways and light fixtures that provide visual interest, shadow, and contrast shall be used to enrich architectural character. Details shall be integrated with the overall design concept. Vary the height and roof levels of the building or residence so that it appears to be divided into smaller massing elements. Architectural projections shall be used to achieve this goal. Articulate building fonns and elevations with varying rooflines, roof overhangs and intennediate roof elements to create strong patterns of shade and shadow. Interlockina Mass Just as stepping the second story mass improves the side yard, it can be used to improve the front yard scene. As an example, the second story should be set back in relationship to the garage face or living space below it. The designer should envision the building form as a series of interlocking masses rather than a rectangular or "l" shaped box. Therefore achieving a more aesthetic design solution. Rorioauah Ranch Svecific Plan N:\31367. OOO\dod\S PSect44CCAdopted.doc 4-124 March, 2003 . 8 8 , ) - DESIGN GUIDELINES Articulation of Side and Rear Elevations There is a tendency to have "build out" planes maximized on side and rear yards without articulated treatment of those planes. This results in a two-story stucco effect with no vertical or horizontal relief. Utilize the following techniques or other acceptable techniques to avoid this effect: Create a single-story plane at the rear by recessing the second story. Utilize other similar architectural treatments and designs such as balconies or pop out staircases to encourage relief on potential large architectural planes. Side and rear elevations shall have articulation with modulated facades, window treatment, second story projections and balconies. Articulation shall be provided on all sides of the homes ("Four-sided Architecture"). Front Elevations Architectural projections shall be utilized to emphasize entrances, balconies, and porches. Fronts of houses shall utilize several architectural features. Ground floor windows shall have significant trim or relief, second floor overhangs or built in planters. Second story windows shall have similar treatment to emphasize them. All residences shall incorporate entry courtyards, covered entries or covered porches at the entry into the design. (See Figure 4-71 and 4-72). . Details shall be concentrated around entrances. Materials used for the front entry shall be distinctive. Building elements that reflect the architectural style should be incorporated into building entries, windows, front porches, and living areas directly adjacent to the street. Ornamental features including wrought iron and exterior light features shall be combined with other features to create interest in the front of the house with architecturally compatible elements. RoriDauoh Ranch SDecific Plan N:\31367.000ldodlSPSect44CCAdopted.doc 4-125 March, 2003 DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10,3.6 Architectural Elements A successful project design achieves a proper visual balance and sense of cohesiveness. The differences between the plans and elevation must be readily discemable and create variety, yet at the same time elements, styles and materials should not contrast to such an extent as to result in visual chaos. Architectural elements will playa significant role in the establishment of the architectural style. These elements include archilectural detailing, colors and materials, and other site structures. The required Archilectural and design elements techniques are as follows: 8 Unit Entries (See Figures 4-71 and 4-72) The entry serves several important architectural and psychological functions: it identffies and frames the front doorway; it acts as an interface between the public and private spaces; and it acts as an introduction to the structure while creating an initial impression. The entry shall be designed and located so as to readily emphasize its prime functions. Accent materials are encouraged to be used to further emphasize the entries. If the front door location is not obvious or visible because of building configuration, the entry shall direct and draw the observer in the desired path. The design of the entry area in merchant-buiil housing shall be strong enough to mitigate the impact of the garage on the facade. Entry doors and doorways shall be proportional to the archilectural style of the structure. Covered entries, courtyards and porches shall be provided as entry elements. Doors Emphasis shall be placed on the design and type of entry door used. It functions as the major introduction to the interior of the house and concem should be given on the image it creates. . Either single or double doors are appropriate. The door shall be covered by an overhead element or recessed a minimum of 3 It into the wall plane. The entire door assembly shall be treated as a single design element including surrounding frame, molding and glass sidelights. Recessed doors may be used to convey the appearance of thick exterior doors. Wood may be used for the entry door. Wood grain texture and raised or recessed panels contribute to the appeal of the door. Greater use is being made of metal entry doors but in order to be acceptable, they shall possess the same residential "feel" provided by the wood grain and panels. Doorways shall be typically rectangular or round-headed and fully recessed. Spiral columns, arches, pilaster, stonework, decorative tiles, or other sculptural details shall be integrated i.nto the doorway design to enhance the visual importance of the entry door. ) Rorioauoh Ranch Sceciflc Plan N :\31367. OOOIdod\SPSect44CCAdopted.doc 4-127 March, 2003 . . . 8; DESIGN GUIDELINES The use of glass in the door and overall assembly is encouraged. It expresses a sense of welcome and human scale. It can be incorporated into the door panels or expressed as single sidelights. double sidelights, transom glass or fan windows. Flexibility is allowed concerning the color of the door. It may match or contrast the accent trim, but should be differentiated from the wall color. Windows Typically, the location of windows is determined by the practical consideration of room layout, possible furniture placement, view opportunities and concern for privacy. Greater design emphasis should be directed to ensure that window placement and organization will positively contribute to the exterior architectural character. Windows greatly enhance the elevation through their vertical or horizontal grouping and coordination with other design elements. This relationship to one another and the walVroof plane creates a composition and sense of order. All windows in a specific plan elevation shall be integrated into the architecture of the building. This should not be interpreted that they are all the same shape, size or type but rather that a hierarchy of windows exists that visually relates and complements one window to another. Windows shall be recessed to convey the appearance of thick exterior walls. Non-recessed windows shall be surrounded with articulated architectural elements such as wood trim. stucco surrounds, shutters or recessed openings, shutters, pot shelves, ledges, sills plantons. and rails that compliment the architecture. . Merchant-built housing occasionally fails to adequately address proper window design and placement on rear and side elevations- This is usually due to prioritization, maintenance and cost factors. Since side elevations and second story rear windows are frequently visible, greater design effort and budget prioritization need to be given. Garaae Doors (See Figure 4-73) Utilizing garage types that compliment the architecture. door designs, and plotting techniques will do much to lessen the repetitious garage doors marching down both sides of a residential street. Variations include: 0 Employment of second-story feature windows above 1he garage. 0 Strong architectural entry elements. 0 Designs with a mix of 2 and 3 car garages, incorporating three single doors in some three car garage plans not facing the street. 0 Allowance for a 10-foot setback between adjacent garages. 0 The use of tandem garages may also be incorporated into the building design. 0 Garage plans with a double door and a single door plan shall not be placed next to each other. If applicable, where lot width permits plans should include swing-in or side entry garages with reduced front yard setbacks of ten (10) feet. Ro"oauah Ranch Soecific Plan N:\31367. OOOldodlSPSect44CCAdopted.doc 4-128 March. 2003 , .. DESIGN GUIDELINES The design of the garage door shall relate to the overall architectural design of the residence. Colors shall be from the same paint palette. Omamentation of garage doors shall be provided to add visual interest from the street scene. The use of the sectional, wood or metal, rolling garage door is required since ~ maximizes the availability of useable driveway length. Several different panel designs shall be utilized for any project proposed by each merchant builder. Metal doors shall only be used when they include either texture or raised panels of a "residentiar nature. The use of window elements is encouraged. The design of the door face shall resull in a treatment which breaks up the expanse of the door plane while being complimentary to thè arch~ectural elevation of the residence. Architectural detail consisting of comices. applied molding or trim or applied headers shall be used. There shall be an 8" recess. (See Exhibit 4-73), Rorloauoh Ranch Soocific Plan N:131367 .OOOldod\SPSect44CCAdopted. doc 4-129 March, 2003 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.6 NOVEMBER 19, 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SPlGriffin Communities Tr 29661-4, PA03-0347\PC SA memo 1-7-04.doc 12 f' .' "',;i',", . ',./ ":, .( . i':O.','i' .'."!:":-'è':'" "i' "," F.::" c,,:' ~", ,o'<n"""l'T;"-:> . . . . C' ...,.".,.,.. -.. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 19,2003 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:01 P.M., on Wednesday November 19, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Olhasso led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio, and Chairman Chiniaeff ABSENT None PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR Aqenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of November 19, 2003 2 Minutes - --. ---- -------..,-.--- RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of November 5, 2003 3 Director's Hearinq Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for October 2003 .~., ,R:\MinutesPC\2003\111903 1 . _",è,," ", ""'."~ "."".".'" ".' "" .."' MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation subject to the changes of the condition deleting Condition No. 5b and 14 and amending No, 20g, Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. . 5 Plannina Application No. PA03-0347 submitted bv Griffin Communities. is a product review for 100 detached sinale familv residences within Plannina Area 4A of the Roripauah Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Sprinas Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Staae Road (APN: 957-340-001) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0347 A PRODUCT REVIEW FOR DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 4A OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED SOUTH OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 957-340-001 TRACT MAP 29661-4 Associate Planner Long, by way of Power Point, presented the report (as per agenda material), noting the following: . . That the proposed project will include 99 units, not 100 (as per agenda material); that the proposed resolution has been corrected; That the proposed project will include four architectural styles, including Mediterranean, Monterey, Ranch, and Craftsman; That the applicant proposed various elements which staff has reviewed, and which are in compliance with the Specific Plan Design Guidelines; That one of the four floor plans will be a single-story project; That the Design Guidelines require four-sided architecture; . That the applicant has proposed various elements that staff has reviewed and that it will be in compliance with the Specific Plan Design Guidelines; That the focal point of the front elevations will be the front door; That all the projects have either a covered entry or a front porch area; That one of the requirements in the Specific Plan will be to avoid the canyon-like affect; . . R:\MinulesPC\2003\111903 ,4 . . . "', ,,' . That 50% of the projects are required to provide architecture forward; that all proposed projects meet this requirement; . That all plots will include decorative hardscape; . That the fencing plan has been reviewed and determined acceptable; . That staff determined that the proposed project will be consistent with the Design Guidelines of the Specific Plan and the General Plan; however, the following are minor changes to the proposed conditions: 0 Condition of Approval No.14 - add language Q!: as amended by these conditions; 0 Condition of Approval No. 19 - amended to read the applicant shall apply for and receive approval of Model Home Complex permit; 0 That the added Development Impact Fee (DIF) categories as single-family residential conditions of approval. For Commissioner Guerriero, Associate Planner Long relayed that the architectural features will meet the intent of the Specific Plan and Design Guidelines for the Monterey architectural style. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Long noted that of the four floor proposed plans, staff required one roofline of each plan to have some variation from the others. Commissioner Olhasso relayed that the Craftsman and the Ranch style homes were disappointing compared to the Design Guidelines and, therefore, was of the opinion that this proposed project is not where it should be at this time. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Jim Teergarden, 110 N. Lincoln Street, of Griffin Communities, relayed that many months and man hours have been devoted to this project and that the applicant has made every change requested by staff. Mr. Charles Addington, 17992 Mitchell South, representing KTGY Group Architecture and Planning, relayed the following: 0 That the floor plans have a different silhouette; that the silhouettes of Plan No. one is different from Plan No. two which create a variation from the street. Advising that she could no approve the proposed project at this time, Commissioner Olhasso relayed that she would be willing to work through some suggestions with the Commission if the applicant were willing to spend the time. Echoing Commissioner Olhasso's comments, Commissioner Guerriero expressed confusion with regard to the Monterey style home presentation viewing it as a California stucco box. . R:\fv1¡~ulesPC\2003\ 111903 5 In response, Mr. Addington stated that the proposed Monterey style would be historically accurate and that this particular style does not have a lot of arched elements: that the proposed style would be more accurate then the depiction in the City's Guidelines. . For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Addington noted that for the Mediterranean style, a Spanish Colonial theme style was chosen; that this style has a lot of arched elements, arched colonnades, rounded windows, shaped shutters, barrel tile roof, and wrought iron grill details which would be consistent with the Spanish Colonial. Commissioner Mathewson noted that from his view, there are only two architectural styles. Mr. Addington stated that the proposed project depicts four distinct styles as defined by the Specific Plan; that only three styles were required; but that a fourth style was added for variety. Commissioner Olhasso noted that neither the Craftsman style nor the Ranch style on Plan No. one would be acceptable. Relaying his disappointment with the Commission's comments, Mr. Teegarden advised the applicant and his representatives have made every concession requested and was of the opinion that this project would be acceptable to the Commission. Mr. Addington echoed that the applicant was of the opinion to have met the objectives of staff with this project. In light of the confusion with regard to the styles, Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern with the direction given to the applicant. Commissioner Mathewson relayed that there are significant differences between the design guidelines and what was presented. . Chairman Chiniaeff suggested that other examples of a Monterey style homes be presented to the Commission. In the interest of being specific for the architect, Commissioner Olhasso suggested working on the garage doors and that the Plan three homes need a new shape. Commissioner Telesio expressed concern with the wrap-around of the homes and is of the opinion that there needs to be more specific detail on the other three sides of the homes. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested forming a sub-committee. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Kevin Everett, representing Ashby USA, stated that the applicant has worked with staff for several months and the concerns of the Commission must be resolved this evening. Mr. Rob Rodine, 110 Lincoln Avenue, representing Griffin Communities stated that he is concerned with the Commission's comments noting that the architects have spent a tremendous amount of time working to stay within the guidelines; that this product is for the consumer and that they have spent thousands of dollars on focus studies and research with regard to what the consumer's needs are. . R:\Mi.~utesPC\2003\ 111903 6 . . . Commissioner Mathewson noted that it is the Commission's duty to ensure that the design guidelines that were adopted for this type of project are being followed. Mr. Tom McAliester, 39430 Liefer Road, noted that the run-of onto his property from the developers is a problem. For Mr. McAliester, Chairman Chiniaeff noted that he contact the Engineering Department. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Chairman Chiniaeff stated that he agrees with the comments on both sides and is of the opinion that a sub-committee would be helpful. Director of Planning Ubnoske concurs with Chairman Chiniaeff in forming a sub-committee for the proposed item. Commissioner Mathewson and Commissioner Olhasso volunteered to be on the sub-committee. MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to continue this item for another month. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 6 Plannina Application No. PA02-0522 an Amendment of the Temecula Reqional Center Specific Plan to establish reaulations aovernina temporary uses in parkina lots of the Promenade Mall (40820 Winchester Road) located at the Promenade Mall RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A TEXT AMENDMENT OF THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDING SECTION III,C.1 TO ESTABLISH TEMPORARY USE REGULATIONS FOR THE LAND AREA ENCOMPASSED BY THE PROMENADE MALL AND SURROUNDING PARKING LOTS INTERIOR OF THE LOOP ROAD LOCATED AT 40820 WINCHESTER ROAD Director of Planning Ubnoske presented a brief staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: That the proposed Specific Plan amendment will permit Car auto shows and sales, RV shows and sales, and Water craft and Boat shows and sales; That the current Development Code allows on a particular piece of property, no more than two of these events a year; that within this Regional Center Specific Plan, the language has been changed to allow up to 12 events, with the provision that there will not be more than two a month; R:\MinutesPC\2003\111903 .7 ITEM #S . . . Date of Meeting: Prepared by: File Number STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 7, 2003 Rick Rush Title: Associate Planner Application Type: PA03-0176 Development Plan Project Description: Recommendation: CEQA: (Check One) A Development Plan to construct, operate and establish a 17,505 square foot commercial two-story building on 1.15 acres located at 41720 Winchester Road. [8] Approve with Conditions D Deny D Continue for Redesign D Continue to: D Recommend Approval with Conditions D Recommend Denial [8] Categorically Exempt (Class) 15332 (In-Fill) D Negative Declaration D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR KID P\2003\O3-0176 Wi"chester PavilionlSTAFF REPORT.doc PROJECT DATA SUMMARY: . Applicant: Binaca Properties, Paul Gupta Completion Date: November 14, 2003 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: May 14, 2004 General Plan Designation: Service Commercial Zoning Designation: Service Commercial Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Office Retail Restaurant Retail/Office Lot Area: 1.15 Acres Total Floor Area/Ratio .34 . Landscape Area/Coverage .21 Parking Required/Provided 59 spaces required and 64 spaces provided (1 :300 Office/Retail) BACKGROUND SUMMARY: [8] 1. [8] 2. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. The attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment A) has been completed and staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City- wide Design Guidelines and the Development Code. ANALYSIS The proposed Development Plan for a 17,505 square foot commercial building has been determined by staff to be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. Staff can make the required findings necessary to approve a two-story commercial building located in the service commercial zoning district and supports the requested increase in the floor area ratio. The floor area ratio for the project is .34, which exceeds the target .30 for the service commercial zoning district. The Development Code offers incentives to increase the floor area ratio to 1.0, if the applicant can meet at least one of the following criteria (Section 17.08.050): . R,ID P\2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlST AFF REPORT.doc . . . 1. The project includes use(s), which provide outstanding and exceptional benefits to the city with respect to the employment, fiscal, social and economic needs of the community. 2. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscaping design amenities, which reflect an attractive image and character to the city. 3. The project provides enhanced public facilities that are needed by the city, beyond those required mitigation impact measures. Staff has determined that the proposed building architecture provides exceptional architecture and meets the second criteria as stated above. The proposed building design exceeds the architectural standards of the Development Code and the architectural policies of the City-Wide Design Guidelines. The following is a list of desirable building elements as stated in the Design Guidelines that have been incorporated into the proposed building: Significant wall articulation Arcade Courtyards Multi-planed pitched roofs Roof overhangs Recessed windows Stepped back second story Substantial building base Vertical building elements that frame storefront The proposed landscaping exceeds the 20% minimum requirement of the Development Code and complements the architectural design theme. The entire building is surrounded by landscaping except for the areas designated as loading areas for the building. The proposed site planning and circulation is consistent with the commercial development performance standards in the Development Code. The proposed site plan has eliminated any conflicts between pedestrian and vehicular traffic by locating the pedestrian access parallel with the vehicular access and by providing sidewalks along the building elevations that lead to all of the building entrances. The required loading spaces have been located along the south elevation of the building and will not be visible from the public right of way. The drive aisles provided are a minimum twenty-four feet wide and provide complete access to the site for Fire Department vehicles. Staff has conditioned the applicant to provide a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to building occupancy (COA# 25). However, staff is requesting Planning Commission direction in regards to the type of signage to be permitted for the subsequent sign program. It is the opinion of staff that illuminated signage should not be permitted at the second story. If illuminated signage were permitted at the second story, staff would recommend utilizing halo lighting. R'ID Pl2003\O3-0176 Wi"ches'" Pavilion\STAFF REPORT.doc ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION [8 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 15332, In-Fill) . CON CLUSION/RECOM M EN DATION: Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City's Design Guidelines, and conforms to all of the applicable development regulations. Staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Service Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Service Commercial (SC) zoning district in the City of Temecula Development Code. A commercial building and uses are typical land uses found in the Service Commercial land use designation within the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed commercial use is compatible with the surrounding commercial buildings currently located adjacent to the proposed site. . 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The architecture proposed for the office building exceeds the architectural requirements as stated in the Design Guidelines and the Commercial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The proposed building architecture and building materials have been found to be compatible with the adjacent buildings. The varying building shapes and offsets provided serve to break up the massing of the building. The project has been reviewed against the Community Design Element goals and policies found in the General Plan and have been found to exceed the goals and policies. The proposed architecture enhances the visual character along Winchester Road and will be a welcome addition to the existing buildings. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. . Ro\D P\2oo3\O3-0176 Winchester Pavilion\STAFF REPORT.doc . . . ATTACHMENTS 1. PC Resolution No. 2004-- - Blue Page 6 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval- Blue Page 7 2. Project Review Worksheets - Blue Page 8 3. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 9 KID P\2oo3\03-0176 Winchester Pavilinn\STAFF REPORT.doc ATTACHMENT NO.1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- RID P\2003\O3.0176 Winchester PavilionlSTAFF REPORT-doc . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0176, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 17,505 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON 1.15 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF JEFFERSON AVENUE KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-270-017 WHEREAS, Paul Gupta, filed Planning Application No. PA03-0176 (Development Plan Application), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on January 7, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinas The Pianning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Sections Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Service Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Service Commercial (SC) zoning district in the City of Temecula Development Code. A commercial building and uses are typical land uses found in the Service Commercial land use designation within the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed commercial use is compatible with the surrounding commercial buildings currently located adjacent to the proposed site. R,\D Pl2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc I B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The architecture proposed for the office building exceeds the architectural requirements as stated in the Design Guidelines and the Commercial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The proposed building architecture and building materials have been found to be compatible with the adjacent buildings. The varying building shapes and offsets provided serve to break up the massing of the building. The project has been reviewed against the Community Design Element goals and policies found in the General Plan and have been found to exceed the goals and policies. The proposed architecture enhances the visual character along Winchester Road and will be a welcome addition to the existing buildings. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. . Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt, Pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a Development Plan to construct, operate and establish a 17,505 square foot tow-story commercial building on 1.15 acres located at 41720 Winchester Road set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. . Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this ih day of January 2004. Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] . KID P\2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 2 . . . STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7'h day of January 2004, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary RID P\2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R,ID P\2oo3\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlSTAFF REPORT.doc . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA03-0176 (Development Plan) Project Description: A Development Plan to construct, operate and establish a 17,505 square foot two-story commercial building on 1.15 acres located at 41720 Winchester Road. DIF Category: Retail Commercial/Office Assessor's Parcel No.: 909-270-017 Approval Date: January 7,2004 Expiration Date: January 7,2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. R,ID P\2003\O3-0176 WincheSte, PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 5 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Restaurant used are not permitted for this building unless the Planning Director finds that sufficient on-site parking based on the requirements of the Development Code, have been provided. . The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D (Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevation), G (Floor Plan), H (Landscape Plan), and I (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Planning Department. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the surrounding parapet wall. . All downspouts shall be internalized. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Exhibit "I" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Planning Department. Field Color Accent Color Paint Accent Color Paint Accent Color 2 Paint Accent Color 3 Railings and Mullions Stone Store Front Windows La Habra Stucco X-53 Pure Ivory La Habra Stucco X-34 San Simeon Dunn Edwards Paint SP-2670 Marble Canyon Dunn Edwards Paint SP-514 Bone Chian Dunn Edwards Paint SP-165 Burnt Crimson PPG Duanar Coating #UC54434 EI Dorado Stone, Mountain Blend Green Tinted 11. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. . R,\D P\2003\O3-0i76 Winches!« PavilionlPC RESOLUTiON AND COAdoc 6 . . . 13. 14. 15. 16. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9- inch apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. A detail of the proposed patio furniture shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. The proposed planting types, size and method for irrigation to be installed on the second floor terraces shall be called out on the construction landscape plans. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H". or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). R,ID P\2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 7 b. d. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. . c. e. Prior to Release of Final Electric 24. 25. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by the Planning Director. All signage shall comply with the approved sign program. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS . General Requirements 26. 27. 28. 29. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right- of-way. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: sidewalks, drive approach, Storm drain facilities b. c. Sewer and domestic water systems . R,ID P\2003\O3-0176 Wincheste, PavilinnIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 8 . . . Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works e. Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. RID P\2003\O3-0176 Winche"« PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 9 38. 39. 40. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. . The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. b. c. . d. e. f. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works City Engineer and approved by City Attorney and City Engineer for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. . RID Pl2003\03-0176 Winche"" PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 10 . . . 46. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 47. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 48. 49. 50. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT 51. 52. 53. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy. use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in force at the time of building. plan submittal. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A- 1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM for a total fire flow of 4350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. 3 fire hydrants shall be required. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) R,ID Pl2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavilioolPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 11 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the ex1erior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) . Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an ex1erior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) . The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) . R,\D P\2oo3\O3-0176 Wincheste' PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 12 . . . 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi- family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex, which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, building final or occupancy, buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of Uniform Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. The storage of high-piled combustible stock may require structural design considerations or modifications to the building. Fire protection R,ID Pl2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 13 73. 74. and life safety features may include some or all of the following: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. (CFC Article 81) Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the wild land-vegetation interface. (CFC Appendix II-A) Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A) Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13,24,72 and 231-C. Prior to building permit issuance a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored on site increase or should R,\D Pl2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 14 . . . . . . changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) COMMUNITY SERVICES General Conditions 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. All landscaping, fencing and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or private maintenance association. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. CR&R will need to review the proposed design. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. If additional streetlights are to be installed as a result of this project then prior to issuance of building permits or the installation of the street lights, which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit the approved Edison streetlight improvement plans and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD maintenance program. BUILDING AND SAFETY All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of- way. R,ID P\2003\03-0176 Winches!e, PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 15 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. . Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. . Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 101. Show all building setbacks. 102. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays . R,ID 1'12003\03-0176 Winchester PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 16 . . . OUTSIDE AGENCIES 103. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 30, 2003, from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. 104- The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated April 7, 2003, from Rancho Water. 105. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated April 14, 2003, from County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. 106. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated February 8, 2003, from the Department of Transportation. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Name Printed KID P\2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 17 . 1995 MARKET STREET RJVÈRSIDE, CA 92501 909.955.1200 909.788.9965 FAX W ARREN]ì,¡~D:IAMSI J'.L ,"'; General M,inàg~r-CljÌèfÈrigineer 83523.1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT July 30, 2003 City of T emecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula. California 92589-9033 Attention: Rolfe Preisendanz ladies and Gentlemen: Re: PA03-0176 The District does not usually review land divisionsíì¡:md use cáses or provide State Division of Real Estate letters/flood hazard reports for projects that are located within incorporated Cities. Exceptions are made for cases with items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issues. PA03-0176 is a proposal to design, construct and operate a commercial building on a 1.15 acre site located at 41720 Winchester Road in the City of T emecula. . The entire site is located within the un shaded Zone X boundary as delineated on Panel No. 0607420005B of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in conjunction with the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta CreeklTemecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid for by cashier's check or money order written to the Flood Control District prior to the issuance of building or grading permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. The following information of a general nature is provided herewith for your use: This project may need to obtain an applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit coveragé from the State Water Resources' Control Board or the California Regiònal Water Quality Control , Board (RWQCB) - San Diego Region. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If the mapped flood plain is impacted by the project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the RWQCB - San Diego Region prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Teresa Tung at 909.955.4050. Very truly yours. . -5Ieve- ~dc:J STEPHEN C. THOMAS Senior Civil Engineer . TT.:sIL',. : c.' .,",¿ ',' @ Rancho Water B",rnl,fDirectoœ Jeffrey L. Minkl« ""'ide"t John E. H,agI~d S<. Vi" p""ident Stephen J. Corona Ralph IL Daily Ben R. Drake Li",D.He=~ C..b. F. Ko om"Œ' John F. He=ig.. Gen,,"! M~.g~ Phillip L. Fo<bes Direoto"fFin~" ,,~ E.P. 'Bob' Lem'~ Vi"""" ,'E"gin"ring Ke=etb C. Dealy Ifu"",, ,'Ope"ti,= & Main"",=" Peny R. Louek C",troll~ Lind. M. Fregoao j)i,triot s.cr.taryIAdmin"troti.e Se,.";,,, M.".g~ C. Miehael Cowe" lie.. llest & Krieg« ILP Ge",,! C,_l '",. April 7, 2003 Rolfe Preisendanz, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 /jPR 9 ;;-,- -uUJ >--, SUBJECT: WATER A V AILABILITY - APN 909-270-017 PARCEL NO. 22 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19582-1 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0176 Dear Mr. Preisendanz: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire,protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium site with individual building owners and a homeowners' association maintaining the common property, and private water and fire protection facilities. As a condition of the project, RCWD requires that the City include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water facilities. In addition to this agreement, RCWD will require individual water meters for each building if a condonÜnium conversion takes plaGe. If you have any questions, Representative at this office. please contact an Engineering Services Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT A~(S~ Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 03\SRmcOI4\FO12-T6\FCF . c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor Bud Jones, Senior Engineering Technician , . """"";"""'. ,';'..," "Rancb,Calif,"'iaWate<Di~'<iet.". :" . ". 42!25W'",h"",lload' P,..C¡n"Box9017' Tem",ula.C,i;r,mia92589.90!7' (909)296-6900'FAX(909)296-6860 ~~ . '-,.....' , , . COUNTY OF RNERSIDE . HEAL Ti-! SERVICES AGENcY D EP ARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH "'c,' April 14,2003 , . APR 1 6 2003 City of Temecula Planmng Departn,1Ynt P.O, Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Rolfe Preisendanz --_.._-,--, RE: PIO1 Plan No. PA03-0176 Dear Mr. Preisendanz: 1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA03-0176, 10 construc1 and operate a 15,156 square fool commercial building and we have no objec1ions, Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. 2. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the following items are required: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. . b) Three comple1e sets of plans for each food establishment (10 include vending machines) will be subnùlted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Unifonn Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330), c) A clearance lelter from the Hazardous Services Materials Managemen1 Branch (909) 358-5055 will be required indicating that the projec1 has been cleared for: . Underground slorage tanks, Ordinance #617.4. . Hazardous Waste Genera1or Services, Ordinance #615.3. . Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in, accordance with Ordinance #651.2, . Waste Reduction Management , nmental Heal1h Specialist (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requiremen1s not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. . cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials , .,¡' ,-,',; ,:,,;'~:::;i,;;;"'4065.C0uhìy'CitéleDrive .'.Riv¡frside,' CA'92503;.¿Phbr\È~.(9Ù9):G58:'53t6.'.FAX (909)358'<,5q,1,7rj,~';;;;,"'J):'i;.;:Ç,,(X'¡;,; -", i"""": (MailingAddress-P,O.BoX7600.Riverside;CA92513-7600)"'""'. ':';,,~,;.. .:",,;:,,'" p,¡.."d"""F"dp"p",gj> ....,,- - - . r... APR 1 0 2003 Riverside Transit Agency 1825 Third Street . P.O. Box 59968 Riverside. CA 92517-1968 Phone: (909) 565-5000 Fax: (909) 565-5001 FebruarY 8, 2003 Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz, Case Planner Planning Dept City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: PA03-0176, Winchester Pavilion, 41270 Winchester Rd - Approval by RTA Dear Mr: Preisendanz: Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan for the proposed commercial building at 41270 Winchester. RT A Bus Route 37 presently serves the project site. A copy of the RT A staff review memo regarding the project is attached. RTA is pleased to convey its approval of the design as submitted. If you need further clarification or I can be of further assistance, please call me at (909) 565-5164 or contact me online at mmccov@riversidetransitcom. . Sincerely, ~ftk Michael McCoy 7 Senior Planner . F;\data\PlanningIMikeM\Word\Dev ReviewlTemecula\20031RTA llrhd - Winchester Pavilion.doc "',;i:::',;X, ' 't' ",~ :.."'"r:,,:- ii".' ";,<' I '-... ..... -~ . Riverside Transit Agency April 8, 2003 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW From: Anne Palatino, Director of Planning Michael McCoy, Senior Planner ~~ City of T emecula, Non-residential project 41270 Winchester Rd - Commercial Bldg - Case #PAO3-0176 SE'ly side of Winchester, SW'ly of Jefferson Av Bus route involved: #37 To: Subject: Summary: The applicant is proposing "Winchester Pavilion", a 15,000 sq 11 service-com- mercial building, near the Interstate 15-Winchester Road overpass. This infill site is easily accessible to Jefferson, Diaz Rd, Promenade Mall, and the historic Old Town neighborhood, RTA Route 37 directly and adequately serves the project site by a bus stop at the nearby corner of Winchester and Enterprise Cir. Additional bus service may be added to Winchester in the future. Staff has no comments on the project for the City. INITIAL REVIEW INFORMATION - Review completed date: April 8, 2003. .. Documents received at RTA: April 4, 2003; Reply-by Date: April 15, 2003; Planning Commission Agenda Date: Unknown or NfA; City CouncilfBd of Supervisors Agenda Date: Unknown or NfA; Thomas Guide Map pg and grid: 958; F-4; Case Number: PA03-176; Case Planner: Rolfe Preisendanz, (909) 694-6400; Applicants: Binaca Properties of Temecula. RTA PLANNING FOLLOW-UP: -.L Standard "Acceptable" letter to jurisdiction without comments Standard "Acceptable" letter to jurisdiction with compliments or positive advisories Letter with comments advising project modifications re transit issues Verbal conversation with Case Planner and appropriate letter follow-up Letter sent: Date: OP File name: F:\data\Pla ni gIMikeMIWord\Dev Review\Temecula\2003lRTA Ltrhd - Winchester Pavilion.doc . SECOND REVIEW: Review materials placed in archive files: Date: ~ O! ., C'!-'i!,;!";',:F-:\ôata\Plarlnin(}IMikeMIWotd\Dev Review\Temecula\2003lWinchesterPavilion.doc .,.'" .'. ' , . " :', .',;-'" ' . .," ." ".. "'-i,' ATTACHMENT NO.2 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEETS R,ID P\2oo3\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlSTAFF REPORTdoc . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Planning Application Number: PA03-0176 Service Commercial Consistent? Yes 1. General Plan Designation: Service Commercial Consistent? 2. Zoning Designation: 3. Environmental Documents Referred to in Making Determination: 0 [8J 0 [8J [8J [8J [8J ~ ~ [8J [8J 0 General Plan EIR Sensitive Biological Habitat Map Sensitive Archeological Area Map Sensitive Paleontological Area Map Fault Hazard Zone Map Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazard Map 100 Year Flood Map Future Roadway Noise Contour Map Other (Specify) Yes Previous EIR/N.D. (Specify Project Name & Approval Date): N/A Submitted Technical Studies (Specify Name, Author & Date): Geotecnical Study Engen Corporation October 31, 2003 Other: ~ Exempt 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration 0 Negative Declaration 0 EIR 4. Environmental Determination: ~ 10 Day Review 0 20 Day Review 0 30 Day Review 5. General Plan Goals Consistency: Consistent ~ ~ ~ Inconsistent 0 0 0 land Use Circulation Housing Ro\D Pl2003\O3-O176 Winchester PavilionlPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 1 Consistent Inconsistent D D D D D D D IðI IðI IðI IðI IðI IðI IðI PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial . OS/Conservation Growth Management/Public Facilities Public Safety Noise Air Quality Community Design Economic Development 6. City-wide Design Guideline Consistency: IðI Site Plannina: A. How does the placement of building(s) consider the surrounding area character? The building has been sited on the lot taken into account the future need for a transportation corridor along Winchester Road. As well as providing cross lot access to the parcel to the south. B. How do the structures interface with adjoining properties to avoid creating nuisances and hazards? The building interfaces well with the existing buildings to the east, west and the south. The massing of the second story has been setback at the west and east elevation as to blend with the existing one story buildings. . C. How does the building placement allow buildings rather than parking lots to define the street edge? As designed the building has been setback on the lot rather than being pushed forward to the street. This has been done to accommodate any future need for a transportation corridor along Winchester as stated in the General Plan. IðI Parkina and Circulation: A. How does the parking lot design allow customers and deliveries to reach the site, circulate through the parking lot, and exit the site easily? The building has been designed in the center of the site to allow customers to enter the site and circulate around the building. A loading zone has been provided at the rear of the site and delivery vehicles will also be able to easily circulate around the site. B. How does the parking lot design provide safe and convenient access to pedestrians and bicyclists? The site has been designed to allow pedestrians to access the building via . RID P\2003\O3-0176 Winche,'« PavilionlPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET-doc 2 . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial sidewalks and pathways located along the north, east and west building elevations. C. How are the service facilities within the parking lot screened or buffered from public view? All services areas have been located to the rear of the building and will be screened by the building from view from the public right of way. Allloading operations are to be performed at the rear of the building. The trash enclosure has been located at the rear of the building and will be surrounded by landscaping to screen its view from the adjacent properties. ~ Buildina Architecture: A. How does the building design provide articulation of the building mass? The proposed building is a two-story building with generous setbacks on all four sides. The two-story element is setback at the front, rear and both sides of the building. The front elevation has a covered arcade area as well as second story balcony. The building footprint at the front elevation has been broken up into three parts, which serves to further break up the front elevation from the public view. Exterior terrace areas have been provided at the west and east elevation that serve to break up the massing along the second story. . B. How is each building "stylistically" consistent with all buildings in a complex, and on all elevations to achieve design harmony and continuity within itself? The proposed building is a stand-alone building. However, the building will be located in an area that is all but built out. The majority of the surrounding buildings were approved prior to the adoption of the current citywide design guidelines. With this in mind staff and the applicant set out to achieve a new standard for the proposed building- Similar materials such as stucco and s-tiles can be found on a good number of the surrounding buildings. C. How does the placement of buildings create a more functional or useful open space between the buildings and/or the street? The placement of the building has created areas along the street edge and the front of the building that are well planted areas. Open space areas have been provided at the second floor of the building for employees and patrons to congregate. . D. How do each of the architectural elements (building base, windows, doors and openings, cornice and parapet, roofline, and finish materials meet the intent of the design guidelines? As proposed the building will have approximately two and half feet of EI Dorado Stone at the base of the first and second floor at the front elevation. This material is meeting the intent of the building base as defined in the design guidelines. As proposed the windows, doors and openings have R,ID Pl2oo3\O3.0176 Winchester PavilionlPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 3 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial been designed as integral part of the façade. The project has incorporated a mix of rooflines, parapets and roof pitches to provide an interesting view to the street. The color scheme and materials proposed for the building will enhance the overall area. . ~ Landscapina: A. Does the plan provide the following ratio of plantings? ~ Yes D No, why? Trees 10% 36" Box 30% 24" Box 60% 15 Gallon Groundcover 100% Coverage In One Year Shrubs 100% 5 Gallon B. Does the landscaped area, ratio, spacing, and size conform with the design guidelines? ~ Yes D No C. How does the internal site landscaping frame the building(s) and separate them from the surrounding pavements? As proposed there will be landscaping on all sides except for the rear of the building. Not landscaping the rear of the building was done to allow for the suites to be loaded from the rear. . D. How does the patio and street' furniture, fixtures, walls and fences integrate with of the architecture and landscaping? The second floor terrace areas will serve to incorporate landscaping on the second floor. This area will also serve as employee and public gathering spaces for the building. The project will be conditioned to provide details of the patio furniture prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. Development Code Consistency: A. How does the plan achieve the performance standards specified in Code Section 17.08.070? . RID P\2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavilionlPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 4 . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Circulation: Ingress and egress to site will be taken via an existing shared driveway to the west. The utilization of existing driveway is consistent with the requirement stated in the Development Code to limit the amount of access points on to major arterial roads. Architectural Desian: The building has been designed to break up the massing of the building by providing jogs along the front footprint. Stepping back the second story serves to break up the massing on all fours side of the building. Site Plannina and Desian: The plan has created covered walkways along the front elevation as recommended in the Development Code. The site plan has also taken into account the requirement to minimize the conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians. Compatibilitv: Stepping back the second story has taken into account the need to preserve the scale of the adjacent one-story buildings. B. Does the application and submitted plans on file conform with all of the applicable minimum development standards? ~ Yes, with conditions D No Net Lot Area: Total Floor Area: Floor Area Ratio: Lot Coverage: 1.15 acres 17,505 square feet .34 22% Arch.!Paleo Fault Zone Flood Habitat Subs.!Liqfctn Stream/Creek R,ID Pl2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavHioolPROIECT REVlEW WORKSHEET. doc 5 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Air Quality N/A Noise N/A Illii>J!)1IIi..c;¡mIDID!iJ'I!J,.§teBIIIIS1Iffi~C;¡I!Ir;m1 ~.êJiq av~esl' ~_ii;1 North Office Service Commercial Service Commercial East Restaurant Service Commercial Service Commercial West Commercial Service Commercial Service Commercial South Hardware Store Service Commercial Service Commercial R,ID P\2003\03-0176 Wincheste' PavilionlPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEETdoc 6 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 PLAN REDUCTIONS R,ID P\2003\O3-0176 Winchester PavitionlSTAFF REPORT.doc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA03-0176 EXHIBIT - VICINITY MAP PLANNING COMMISSION DATE JANUARY 7, 2004 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA03-0176 EXHIBIT - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION - SERVICE COMMERCIAL PLANNING COMMISSION DATE JANUARY 7, 2004 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA03-0176 EXHIBIT C -GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - SERVICE COMMERCIAL PLANNING COMMISSION DATE JANUARY 7, 2004 CASE NO. - PA03-0176 EXHIBIT - SURROUNDING LAND USE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE JANUARY 7, 2004 CITY OF TEMECULA "iI"""";;","""""""" » Ilrl'I"!i'Ii'iIlIUJJillllillll """""""""'1"'" iJj "i'lilliljllllllli iljll IIII~ IIIIII ~ lId;: Iii ~ ,\ ¡, Inl!!! î !l1!!1!! ," 'In¡¡ !! II 11'1 ! '¡ I !i1l íI¡II ! ' 'I L~I lill II ! ~ ¡II 'I I ' 1111 I i CITY OF TEMECULA 0 @@@@@@@@6@@@@@@0@@6øø@eøøøøeeD jf'6Iijjlli¡iiljillill~lìf¡¡!¡I!III~ ' 'lbI!p! ',II l'IIIU!lJllrt!¡íI~ ¡ ii" j I i I r ¡ j Ii ¡ i I: ,1 I I ¡ I ì ¡j Ipl,¡rfi II ¡¡ liLI! , I , i 'I I , i! 11' I "I, ¡ ,H I' I II II II \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ % \ t \ \ CASE NO. - PA03-0176 EXHIBIT D - SITE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE JANUARY 7,2004 CITY OF TEMECULA f":\ Eð¡¡T E:XTEfUQB ELEVATIO >¡ f":\ NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION f":\ WE;§T EXTERIOR ELEVATION 0~~qEXTERIOR ELEVATION CASE NO. - PA03-0176 EXHIBIT F -ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE JANUARY 7, 2004 ø ~~;LOOR PLAN ø ~~D flOOR PLAN CASE NO. PAO3-0176 EXHIBIT G- FLOOR PLAN PLANNING COMMiSSION DATE - JANUARY 7, 2004 CITY OF TEMECULA ~~---------------------- ---- ---------- ... ,-,'- 0 0 -- ,_._, CASE NO. PA03-0176 EXHIBIT H -LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 7, 2004 ..- ""'" ,.------ .------ u_----. -------.- ..------- .._---.-~ ., [ -- -'.. I -- "..". ,..- -- .,.". --- ==-:;:;:. .:::~ ::::= @ - - PREUMINARY PLANTING PLAN ITEM #6 . . . Date of Meeting: Prepared by: File Number STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 7,2004 Dan Long Title: Associate Planner Application Type: Minor Conditional Use Permit PA03-0525 Project Description: Recommendation: CEQA: A Minor Conditional Use Permit to establish a 1,655 square foot wine tasting and retail establishment in an existing commercial building, located at 27493 Ynez Rd. (APN: 921-270-055) k8J Approve with Conditions 0 Deny 0 Continue for Redesign 0 Continue to: 0 Recommend Approval with Conditions 0 Recommend Denial k8J Categorically Exempt (Class) 15301 0 Negative Declaration 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR RoW C U Pl2003\O3-O525 Temec"la Valley Wine CompanylSTAFF REPORT-PC.doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY: . Applicant: Temecula Valley Wine Company, Michael Cho Completion Date: September 16, 2003 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: January 20, 2004 General Plan Designation: Community Commercial Zoning Designation: Community Commercial Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Community Commercial North: Community Commercial South: Professional Office East: Community Commercial West: Interstate 15 Freeway Lot Area: N/A . Total Floor Area/Ratio N/A Landscape Area/Coverage N/A Parking Required/Provided N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY: ~1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The proposed project is a request to establish a 1,655 square foot wine tasting and retail facility within an existing commercial center. The project includes interior modifications to the building as well as the addition of an outdoor patio area (approximately 139 square feet). The outdoor patio includes tables and chairs within a wrought iron patio area located in the front of the suite. The applicant has proposed wrought iron fencing 3'-6" in height designed to match the existing wrought iron fencing in the surrounding area. As a condition of approval, the wrought iron fencing shall be painted to match the existing wrought iron fencing in the center as approved by the Director of Planning. Also, the applicant . R,W C U P\2oo3\O3-0525 Temecula Valley Wine CompanylSTAFF REPORT-PCdoc 2 . . . The applicant is requesting a wine tasting facility, which requires a Type 42 (beer and wine consumption on and off-site) and Type 20 (sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption) license from the California Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control (ABC). The ABC has informed staff that the proposed facility, within Census Tract 432.16 is over-concentrated. There are a maximum of 6 Type 42 licenses allowed (27 existing) and a maximum of 5 Type 20 licenses allowed (12 existing) within tract 432.16. Staff can make the findings because the applicant is a specialized business focusing on local wineries, which is supporting the local economy. In addition, staff has consulted with the GIS division, which has provided a 500' radius map and no public parks, religious institutions, or school are located within 500 feet of the proposed facility. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION [8]1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 15301, existing facility with minor exterior changes) CONCLUSION/R ECOM M EN D A TIO N: Staff has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. Staff recommends the Planning Commission make the findings for Public Convenience or Necessity, as well as the findings for approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit. In addition, staff recommends the Planning Commission determine that the project is exempt from CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301, existing facilities. FINDINGS Criteria to justify making a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity: 1. Does the proposed establishment have any unique features, which are not found in other similar uses in the community (i.e. types of games, types of food, other special services)? The proposed establishment is a unique business because it is a wine tasting facility that specializes in local wineries, which will serve to boost the local economy by providing an opportunity to local citizens as well as tourists the opportunity to experience local wines- This facility will further enhance the reputation of the area as a wine-making region. 2. Does the proposed establishment cater to an under-served population (i.e. patrons of a different socio-economic class)? The proposed facility will cater to tourists as well and local citizens seeking fine local wines. While these types of facilities cater to many various socio-economic classes, it cannot be anticipated that the proposed establishment will serve to anyone particular socio-economic class, or an under-served population. R,W C U 1'\2003\03-0525 Temec,,!. Valley Wine Company\STAFF REPORT-Pc.doc 3 3. Does the proposed establishment cater to an under-served population (i.e. patrons of a different socio-economic class)? . The proposed facility will cater to tourists as well and local citizens seeking fine local wines. While these types of facilities cater to many various socio-economic classes, it cannot be anticipated that the proposed establishment will serve to anyone particular socio-economic class, or an under-served population. 4. Would the proposed mode of operation of the proposed establishment (i.e. sales in conjunction with gasoline sales, tours, etc.) be unique or differ from that of other establishments in the area? The proposed facility is different than other establishments because it specializes in local wineries. There are not many facilities specializing in local wineries of the area. 5. Are there any geographical boundaries (i.e. rivers, hillsides) or traffic barriers (i.e. freeways, major roads, major intersections) separating the proposed establishment from other establishments? The nearest facilities most similar to the proposed facility is Bailey's restaurant, located on the east side of Ynez Road in the Temecula shopping center and the Beer and Wine Garden located in Old Town, which separated by Interstate 15 freeway- There is an Italian restaurant, Scarcella's located in the same center, however it is primarily a restaurant that serves wine, beer and spirits. 6. Is the proposed establishment located in an area where there is a significant influx of population during certain seasonal periods? . The proposed facility is located in the Tower Plaza, which provides outdoor concerts during the summer months- Also, during the winter holiday season, the center experiences a greater number of patrons. 7. Is there a proliferation of licensed establishments within the Census Tract of the proposed establishment? According to the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control there is currently an over concentration of (Type 42) on-sale beer and wine and (Type 20) off-sale beer and wine licenses within the subject Census Tract (432.16). There are a total of 27 Type 42 licenses (6 allowed) and a total of 12 Type 20 licenses (5 allowed) in Census Tract 432.16. 8. Are there any sensitive uses (i.e., schools, parks, hospitals, churches) in close proximity (500 feet) to the proposed establishment? Staff has conducted a 500-foot radius search and it was concluded that there are not any schools, parks, hospitals or churches within 500 feet of the proposed site. This includes the duck pond located at the southeast corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. There are medical offices located on the northern portion of the center, however these facilities function as a separate center and will not be influenced by the proposed use. . RoW C U P\2oo3\O3-0S25 Ternecu!a Valley Wine Cornpany\STAFF REPORT-PC.doc 4 . . . 9. 10. Would the proposed establishment interfere with these sensitive areas? It is not anticipated that the proposed use would interfere with any sensitive areas. Would the proposed establishment interfere with the quiet enjoyment of their property by the residents of the area? There are not any residences located near the proposed project site; therefore the project would not interfere with the quiet enjoyment of property by residences. 11. Will the proposed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area? Any establishment serving alcohol has potential to add to law enforcement problems, however it is not anticipated that there will be any significant concerns with law enforcement in the area as a result of this project. The hours of operation as indicated in the statement of operations are 9:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. seven days a week. In addition, the facility is for tasting and purchasing of local wines; it is not a full service bar establishment. Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.040.010E) 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan (Community Commercial) and Zoning (Community Commercial) designation as well as the standards within the Development within the Development Code. 2. The proposed minor conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed minor conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because the proposed project will provide a needed use in the area, and bring additional people to the center, which will create additional revenue for the surrounding businesses. 3. The nature of the proposed minor conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community because the project will provide additional resources for the local wine growers while enhancing the reputation of the region as a wine growing region. R,W C U P\2oo3\03-O525 Temecula Valley Wine Company\STAFF REPORT-PC.doc 5 ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7 PC Resolution No. 2004-- Making Findings of Public Necessity or Convenience - Blue Page 8 2. 3. PC Resolution No. 2004-- Approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit - Blue Page 9 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10 RoW C U Pl2oo3\O3-0525 Temecula Valley Wine CompanylSTAFF REPORT-PC.doc 6 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS RoW C U P\2oo3\03-O525 Temecula Valley Wine CompanylSTAFF REPORT-PCdoc 7 CITY OF TEMECULA I~ CASE NO. - PA03-0525 EXHIBIT - VICINITY MAP PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - January 7, 2004 CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION - Communi CASE NO. - PAO3-0525 PLANNING COMMiSSION DATE - January 7,2004 2 CITY OF TEMECULA --~- -..-' .-..-..-..-..-..-..- ..-..-..-..-..-..- ..--..- ..-..- - N -,. YNEZ ROAD "-"-..-..-/ 0'" PROJECT ..~<;,A.~~._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._. .......~- VONS SUB MAJOR STORE . ST"" UERE rIfI¡;JfrII l ~ ~,,~~l( "","w. ""WoE BANK OF AMERICA ~ LJ c:: CASE NO. - PA03-0525 EXHIBIT - SITE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - January 7,2004 3 CITY OF TEMECULA \ ELOCATED (E) DOOR. PTD TO MATCH EXIST. FIXED WINDOWS AS SHEDULED. PTD. TO MATCH EXIST. EXISTING DOOR TO BE REHINGED & REINSTAll m . 10 I Ì<) CASE NO. - PA03-0525 EXHIBIT - ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - January 7, 2004 4 ATTACHMENT NO.2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- MAKING FINDINGS OF PUBLIC NECESSITY OR CONVENIENCE R,W C U P\2003\O3-0525 Temecu!a Valley Wine CompanylSTAFF REPORT-PC.doc 8 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A FINDING OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FOR A TYPE 42 (ON-SALE BEER AND WINE) AND TYPE 20 (OFF- SALE BEER AND WINE) ALCOHOL LICENSE FOR THE TEMECULA VALLEY WiNE COMPANY LOCATED AT 27493 YNEZ ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-270-055. WHEREAS, Michael Cho, representing Temecula Valley Wine Company filed a request for a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the request for a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; and; WHEREAS, the application was processed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on January 7, 2004 to consider the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the request for a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission and after due consideration of the staff report and public testimony, the Planning Commission denied the request for a Finding Public Convenience or Necessity; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the request for a Finding Public Convenience or Necessity hereby makes the following findings: Criteria to Justifv Makina a Findina of Public Convenience or Necessitv A. Does the proposed establishment have any unique features, which are not found in other similar uses in the community (i.e. types of games, types of food, other special services)? The proposed establishment is a unique business because it is a wine tasting facility that specializes in local wineries, which will serve to boost the local economy by providing an opportunity to local citizens as well as tourists the opportunity to experience local wines. This facility will further enhance the reputation of the area as a wine making region. R,W C U P\2oo3\O3-0525 Teme",!a Valley Wine Company\PC Reso w- conditions.doc 1 B. Does the proposed establishment cater to an under-served population (i.e. patrons of a different socio-economic class)? The proposed facility will cater to tourists as well and local citizens seeking fine local wines. While these types of facilities cater to many various socio-economic classes, it cannot be anticipated that the proposed establishment will serve to anyone particular socio-economic class, or an under-served population. . C. Would the proposed mode of operation of the proposed establishment (i.e. sales in conjunction with gasoline sales, tours, etc.) be unique or differ from that of other establishments in the area? The proposed facility is different than other establishments because it specializes in local wineries. There are not many facilities specializing in local wineries in the area. D. Are there any geographical boundaries (i.e. rivers, hillsides) or traffic barriers (i.e. freeways, major roads, major intersections) separating the proposed establishment from other establishments? The nearest facilities most similar to the proposed facility is Bailey's restaurant, located on the east side of Ynez Road in theTemecula shopping center and the Beer and Wine Garden located in Old Town, which separated by Interstate 15 freeway. There is an Italian restaurant; Scarcella's located in the same center, however it is primarily a restaurant that serves wine, beer and spirits. E. Is the proposed establishment located in an area where there is a significant influx of population during certain seasonal periods? . The proposed facility is located in the Tower Plaza, which provides outdoor concerts during the summer months. Also, during the winter holiday season, the center experiences a greater number of patrons. F. Is there a proliferation of licensed establishments within the Census Tract of the proposed establishment? According to the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control there is currently an over concentration of (Type 42) on-sale beer and wine and (Type 20) off-sale beer and wine licenses within the subject Census Tract (432.16). There are a total of 27 Type 42 licenses (6 allowed) and a total of 12 Type 20 licenses (5 allowed) in Census Tract 432.16. G. Are there any sensitive uses (i.e., schools, parks, hospitals, churches) in close proximity (500 feet) to the proposed establishment? Staff has conducted a 500-foot radius search ring and it was concluded that there are not any schools, parks, hospitals or churches within 500 feet of the proposed site. This includes the duck pond located at the southeast corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. There are medical offices located on the northern portion of the center, however these facilities function as a separate center and will not be influenced by the proposed use. H. Would the proposed establishment interfere with these sensitive uses? . It is not anticipated that the proposed use would interfere with any sensitive uses- R,W C U P\2oo3\O3-0525 Temec,,!a Valley Wine CompanylPC Reso w- ,""ditions.doc 2 . . . I. Would the proposed establishment interfere with the quiet enjoyment of their property by the residents of the area? There are not any residences located near the proposed project site, therefore the project would not interfere with the quiet enjoyment of property by residences. J. Will the proposed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area? Any establishment serving alcohol has potential to add to law enforcement problems, however it is not anticipated that there will be any significant concerns with law enforcement in the area as a result of this project. The hours of operation as indicated in the statement of operations are 9:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. seven days a week. In addition, the facility is for tasting and purchasing of local wines; it is not a full service bar establishment. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA03-0525 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities, Class 1). This project is an existing facility with minor improvements to the interior and ex1erior of the building. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Director of Planning hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request for a Minor Conditional Use Permit establish 1,655 square foot wine tasting and retail establishment in an existing commercial building, located at 27493 Ynez Rd. (APN: 921-270-055), attached hereto on Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7'h day of January 2004. Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary {SEAL} R,W C U P\2oo3\O3-0525 Temecu!a Valley Wine CompanylPC Reso w- conditions.doc 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7'h day of January 2004, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R,W C U P\2oo3\O3-0525 Temeculn Valley Wiue CompanylPC Reso w- conditions.doc 4 . . . . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 03-0525, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A 1,655 SQUARE FOOT WINE TASTING AND RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT IN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 27493 YNEZ ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-270-055. WHEREAS, Michael Cho, representing Temecula Valley Wine Company filed Planning Application No. PA03-0525, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA03-0525 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA03-0525 on January 7, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission's Hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA03-0525 subject to the conditions of approval after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA03-0525 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA03-0525 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.01 O.E of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan (Community Commercial) and Zoning (Community Commercial) designation as well as the standards within the Development within the Development Code. B. The proposed project is compatibie with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because the proposed project will provide a needed use in the area, and bring additional people to the center, which will create additional revenue for the surrounding businesses. C. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community because the project will provide additional resources for the local wine growers while enhancing the reputation of the region as a wine growing region. RoW C U P\2oo3\O3-0525 Temec,,!a Valley Wine CompanylPC Reso w- conditions.doc 5 Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA03-0525 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities, Class 1). This project is a minor improvements to the interior and exterior of the building. . Section 4, Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request for a Minor Conditional Use Permit establish 1,655 square foot wine tasting and retail establishment in an existing commercial building, located at 27493 Ynez Rd., attached hereto on Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on this 7th day of January 2004. Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary {SEAL} 8 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) )ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004- was duly and regularly adopted b~ the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7' day of January 2004, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary . R,W C U P\2oo3\O3-0525 Temecuta Valley Wine CompanylPC Reso w. conditions.doc 6 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0525 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) The use hereby permitted is to establish 1,655 square foot wine tasting and retail establishment in an existing commercial building, located at 27493 Ynez Rd. (APN: 921-270-055) Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-270-055 Approval Date: January 7,2004 Expiration Date: January 7,2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. The applicant shall comply with the statement of operations (attached) date stamped September 16, 2003, for PA03-0525 on file with the Planning Division, unless superceded by these Conditions of Approval. 3. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. 5. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 6. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 7. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours of 9:00 am to 8:00 pm seven days a week. RoW C U P\2003\O3-0525 Temec,,!a Valley Wine CompanylPC Reso w- conditions.doc 7 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall verify that all outdoor wrought iron will match the color and design of existing wrought iron fencing within the shopping center. . Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit photos of the proposed outdoor furniture, which shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director. All outdoor furniture shall be maintained in a reasonable manner subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit verification the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control has issued the necessary type 20 and 42 beer and wine permits. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall comply with all Riverside County Health Department and submit a clearance letter to the Planning Department. BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT 13. 14. 15. 16. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. (If modifications to exterior lighting is proposed) . Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,1998) 17. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 18. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 19. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 20. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. (For applicable modifications proposed) . 21. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. R,W C U P\2003\O3-0525 Temec"la Valley Wine CompanylPC Reso w- conditioos.doc 8 22. . 23. 24. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. Show all building setbacks. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays FIRE DEPARTMENT 25. 26. . 27. 28. . Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. Exiting shall comply with the California Building Code and California Fire Code. Details will be worked out during plan check. OUTSIDE AGENCIES The applicant shall comply with the attached letter from the Riverside County Health Department dated September 25, 2003. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above-mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Printed Name Date Applicant Signature R,W C U Pl2003\O3-0525 Temec,,!a Valley Wine CompanylPC Reso w- conditions.doc 9 j}.(','.;',;r'T;::.:;:;'~,~':',";". :)':'\',:~'d""'-"-""-'~""'; <.<,:-- '-':',: - ;A COUN1Y OF RIVERSIDE. COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY ~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 8 Sep1ember 25, 2003 City af Temecula Planning Depar\ment P-O. Bax 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attentian: Dan Long RE: PIal Plan No.. PA03-0525 Dear Mr.Long: 1. The Department of Environmental Healih has reviewed the Plot Plan No.. PA03-O525, 10. cans1mct and aperate 1,655 sq. ft. wine lasting and retail facility and we have no abjectians. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. 2. PRIOR TO ANY BillLDlNG PLAN CHECK APPROVAL for Environmental Healih clearance, ihe fallawing items are required: a) "Will-serve" letters from 1he appropriate water and sewering agencies. b) Three complete sets af plans far each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in arder 10. ensure compliance wiih ihe California Uniform Retail Faod Facilities Law. For specific reference, please conlact Faod Facili1y Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330). . Sincerely, nvironmen1al Healih Specialist (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any curren1 additianal requiremen1s nat cavered can be applicable at time af Building Plan review for final Department of Environrnenlal Healih clearance. NR~~-:;-----. 'l!,¡LC; I" rè I: V, i?rd he]': ~ -I ij Lè;¡pií ,¡,O OCT 0 ' filii ill- 1 ZO03 iN II I ,,/, -- .. .:-- "".- . . -',,- ¡By - )1 ' ;.,," .Loé.t Enfo<ce;nènt' Agenéy . ro. BdX 1280, Rlve"lde! CA 92502-1280 "1909) 955:8982 . FÄX¡9091'71rn65-:'!'--408flLemonj"eet. 9th Flom, Riverside. CA 92501 Lå"d Use and Water Engineering'. PO. Box 1206, Riverside, CA92502-J206 . (9091 955-8980 ' FAX (909) 955-8903-:'4ÒBD~ Strèet, 2nd Floor. Riverside. CA 92501 .