HomeMy WebLinkAbout060204 PC Agenda
'-"gin compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this/' meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
JUNE 2, 2004 - 6:00 P.M.
********
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 2004-027
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
RollCall:
Commissioner Olhasso
Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Telesio
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item !!Q! on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all' other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be tiled with the
Commission Secretary illi2r to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
1 Aaenda
RECOMMENDATION:
R: IP LAN co M MlAge nd as \2004106-0 2 -04 . doc
'1; 1 Approve the Agenda of June 2, 2004
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2 Review of the 2005,2009 Capital Improvement Proaram. David Hoaan. Principal Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Review the proposed Capital Improvement Program for 2005-2009 and provide
comments to the City Council on the consistency with the adopted General Plan
3 Vacation of Interior Streets within the Tract 26941 (Crowne Hill Larae Lot). Determination of
ConformitY with the General Plan. David Hoaan. Principal Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Determine that the Vacation of Wolfe Street and Musilek Place to private streets is in
conformity with the adopted General Plan for the City of Temecula.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard In support of or In opposition to the
approval of the pro ect(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
pro ectsln court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public heating or in written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
New Items
4 Plannina Application No. PA03-0582. submitted bv Dean Davidson representina LandAm
Construction' Companv. a Development Plan to construct a 26.104 SQuare foot
office/warehouse buildina on 3.64 acres located at the northeast corner of Roick Drive and
Via Industria. Stuart Fisk. Associate Planner
5 Plannina Application No. PA04-0152. submitted bv Mark Richter. MDMG Inc.. a Conditional
Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a 13.777 SQuare foot school facilitY on 4.37
acres located at 29275 Santiaao Road. Dan Lona. Associate Planner
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next reguiarmeeting: June 16, 2004
Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
R: IPLAN co M MlAgend as \2004\0 6.02.04. doc
2
ITEM #2
Date of Meeting:
Prepared by:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
June 2, 2004
David Hogan
Title:
Principal Planner
Project Description:
Review of the 2005-2009 Capital Improvement Program
That the Planning Commission review the proposed Capital Improvement
Program for 2005 - 2009 and provide comments to the City Council on the
consistency with the adopted General Plan.
Recommendation:
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
Section 65403 (c) of State Planning and Zoning Law requires that the Planning Commission review
and provide comments to the City Council conceming the conformity of the proposed Capital
Improvement Program with the adopted General Plan. The role of the Planning Commission is to
review the proposed projects and determine if the projects are consistent with the City General Plan.
While the timing may be of interest to the Commission, and the Council is interested in the
Commission's thoughts, the primary issue for the Planning Commission is whether or not the project
as proposed is consistent with the General Plan.
DISCUSSION
\
.....,
The City Departments have been meeting over the last few months to finalize the 2005-2009 Capital
improvement Program (CIP). The CIP covers the funding and timing for major capital and
construction projects throughout the City. The priority categories for CIP projects are as follows:
The project is urgent and must be completed as soon as feasible. Failure to address
the project may impact the health, safety, or welfare of the community; or have a
significant impact on the financial well being of the City. The project must be initiated
or financial opportunity losses may result.
The project is important and addressing it is necessary. The project impacts safety,
law enforcement, health, welfare, economic base, and\or quality of life.
The project will enhance the quality of life and will provide a benefit to the community.
Completion of the project will improve the community by providing cultural,
recreational, and\or aesthetic value.
The project will be an improvement to the community, but does not necessarily need
to be completed within a five-year capital improvement program time frame. This
category may include projects that may need to be initiated in the subsequent CIP
cycles.
Staff recommends that the Commission review the 2005 - 2009 Capital Improvement Program and
make a determination that the projects included in the CAP are consistency with the General Plan.
Priority I:
Priority II:
Priority III:
Priority IV:
ATTACHMENT
1. 2005-2009 Capital Improvement Program - Available for Public Review in City Council
Chambers
R:\Staff ReportlCIP Review 2004 PC,doc
ATTACHMENT NO.1
DRAFT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
R:\Stafi ReportlCIP Review 2004 PC.doc
ITEM #3
)
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date of Meeting:
June 2, 2004
Prepared by:
David Hogan
Title:
Principal Planner
Recommendation:
(Check One)
Vacation of Interior Streets within the Tract 26941 (Crowne Hill
Large Lot), Determination of Conformity with the General Plan
0 Approve with Conditions
Project Description:
D Deny
0 Continue for Redesign
0 Continue to:
D Recommend Approval with Conditions
0 Recommend Denial
IXIMake a Determination of Consistency with the General Plan
---!
CEQA:
(Check One)
D Categorically Exempt
(Class)
D Negative Declaration
D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
IXI Exempt
BACKGROUND
Tentative Tract 26941 was first approved by the City in 1993. At that time, the project was
designed with public streets providing access to 28 single family lots. The Final Map was
approved by City Council on June 24, 2003 and recorded on August 6, 2003. Following the
recordation of the Final Map, the developer of Tract 26941 requested that the City vacate Wolfe
Street and Musilek Place so they can become private streets and this area can be gated to
restrict public access. The vacation of public streets is addressed in Section 8313 of the Streets
and Highways Code which requires that all requests to vacate streets be considered by the
Planning Commission to determine if the request is consistent with the adopted General Plan.
The pertinent excerpts from State Law are contained in Attachment No.2.
R:\General PJan\Crowne Hill Interior Street Vacation Pc.dot
ANALYSIS
Tract 26941 is located along the eastern side of the Crowne Hill development and consists of the
subdivision of 133 acres into single family residential 28 lots. Wolfe Street provides access to
this area. The primary access is off Crowne Hill Drive and there is secondary access point off of
Old Kent Road (near the site of the future Crowne Hill Elementary School). When the
subdivision was initially approved, the primary access road, Wolfe Street, was also intended to
provide secondary access to the future elementary school. The layout of streets in this area is
contained in Attachment No.3. Because Musilek Place is a cul-de-sac providing only local
street access, the following discussion will focus on Wolfe Street.
To determine consistency with the General Plan, Staff has reviewed the adopted General Plan to
assess conformity in terms of the goals, policies, and exhibits. To be consistent with the General
Plan, the proposal can not undermine or block the accomplishment of the policy direction
provided by the adopted Plan. Based upon this review, the following General Plan components
relate to the proposed vacation.
Circulation Element
These streets are not shown on the Circulation (Road Network) Map; though most Collector
Streets are not shown the Circulation Plan. However, Wolfe Street does not provide a vital
citywide road network connection. The area impacted the closure is primarily local in nature and
associated with traffic around the future elementary school.
Policy 2.2 requires '1hat future roads and improvements to existing roads be designed to minimize
traffic conflicts such as those which result from curb parking maneuvers and uncontrolled access
along heavily traveled roadways." The vacation of Wolfe Street has the potential to increase the
number of vehicle conflicts around the intersection of Fox and Old Kent Roads by forcing all school
related traffic through a single intersection. However, locating the student pick-up and drop-off area
along Fox Road is expected to address most of these potential concerns. A copy of the proposed
elementary school site plan in contained in Attachment No.4.
---j
No other General Plan goals or policies appear to relate to this matter. As a result, it is
presumed that these remaining goals, policies, and exhibits related to other issues, not the
proposed vacation.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The request for this determination of consistency with the General Plan is not an activity that has
the potential to effect the physical environment because the underlying tract map has already
received appropriate environmental review. As a result, this item is exempt from environmental
review pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) ofthe CEQA Guidelines.
CONC LUSIONIRECOMM EN DATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the proposed vacation of a residential
street and make a determination the vacation is consistent with the adopted General Plan.
R:IGeneral PlanlCrowne Hill Interior Street Vacation PC,dot
i
-
ATTACHMENTS
1.
PC Resolution 2004-- Blue Page 4
2.
State Law Excerpts - Blue Page 7
Road Network Exhibit - Blue Page 9
3.
4.
Preliminary Layout for Crowne Hill Elementary School- Blue Page 10
R:lGeneral PlanlCrowne Hill Interior Street Vacation PC,dot
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PC RESOLUTION 2004--
R:lGeneral PlanlCrowne Hill Interior Street Vacation PC,dot
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004--
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA DETERMINING THAT THE VACATION OF
WOLFE STREET AND MUSILEK PLACE ARE IN CONFORMITY
WITH THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code (State Planning and Zoning Law)
requires that local agencies adopt a General Plan;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan on
, November 1993;
WHEREAS, Section 8313 of the Streets and Highway Code and Section 65402 of State
Planning and Zoning Law requires that the Planning Commission review all requests to vacate
public streets;
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 26941 was first approved by the City of Temecula in
1993 and the Final Map was approved by the City Council and recorded in 2003;
WHEREAS, the owner of Tract 26941 has requested that the City of Temecula vacate
the street so that the area can be gated to restrict public access;
----?
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a duly noticed meeting, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition
to this matter;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
HEREBY DETERMINES THAT THE VACATION OF WOLFE STREET AND MUSILEK PLACE
TO PRIVATE STREETS IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN FOR
THE CITY OF TEMECULA.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission
this 2nd day of June, 2004.
John Telesio, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:IGeneral PlanlCrowne Hill Interior Street Vacation PC,dot
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of June 2004, by the
following vote:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNiNG COMMISSIONERS:
AYES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\Generai PlanlCrowne Hill Interior Street Vacatioo PC,dot
ATTACHMENT NO.2
EXCERPTS OF STATE LAW
R:lGeneral PlanlCrowne Hill Interior Street Vacatioo PC,dot
, -)
EXCERPTS OF STATE LAW
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Section 8313.
éI) If the proposed vacation of a street, highway, or public service easement is within an
area for which a general plan is adopted by a local agency, the legislative body of
the public entity shall consider the general plan prior to vacating the street, highway,
or public service easement.
b) The procedure prescribed in Section 65402 of the Government Code shall be
followed if that section applies to the proposed vacation. If Section 65402 of the
Government Code does not apply to the proposed vacation, the legislative body may
submit the proposed vacation to the local planning commission or planning agency
and give the commission or agency an opportunity to report upon the proposed
vacation.
STATE PLANNING AND ZONING LAW
Section 65402. Restrictions on acquisition and disposal of real property
~
a) If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, no real property shall be acquired
by dedication or otherwise for street, square, park or other public purposes, and no
real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned, and no
public building or structure shall be constructed or authorized, if the adopted general
plan or part thereof applies thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such
acquisition or disposition, such street vacation or abandonment, or such public
building or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning
agency as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. The planning
agency shall render its report as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part
thereof within forty (40) days after the matter was submitted to it, or such longer
period of time as may be designated by the legislative body.
If the legislative body so provides, by ordinance or resolution, the provisions of this
subdivision shall not apply to: (1) the disposition of the remainder of a larger parcel
which was acquired and used in part for street purposes; (2) acquisitions, dispositions,
or abandonments for street widening; or (3) alignment projects, provided such
dispositions for street purposes, acquisitions, dispositions, or abandonments for street
widening, or alignment projects are of a minor nature.
R:IGeneraJ PlanlCrowne Hill Interior S\reet Vacation PC.dot
ATTACHMENT NO.3
ROAD NETWORK EXHIBIT
R:lGeneral PJan\Crowne Hill Interior Street Vacation PC.dot
Legend
B Centerline
Parcels
CIty
Á
400
800 Feet
::.:.::.=. %:'" ":."~ "=='
-.".._""""'--
"""-"""""--
.._"""",. """""'1__..
- " .... .........~..... -- -....
""""" """'--"""'"
..-..-...- ""-
--"'-"""""""'-"'"
--............ """".""""""'-,
ATTACHMENT NO.4
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT FOR CROWNE HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
R:lGeneraIPlan\Crowne Hill Interior Street Vacation PC,dot
10
---7
~
z :\
:5~\
a.. a
W
!:::
(f)
01-
O~
..cO::
01-
(/)~
è:'o
COO
+-,I
CO
(DC/)
E~
(D!!:
-- z
w:)
>-
= LU
.-...J
I...J
~
(Do:(
C...J
3:3
ow
L..:2:
()~
ITEM #4
)
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date of Meeting:
June 2, 2004
Prepared by:
Stuart Fisk
Title: Associate Planner
File Number
PA03-0582
Application Type:
Development Plan
Project Description:
A Development Plan to construct a 26,104 square foot
office/warehouse building on 3.64 acres located at the northeast
corner of Rojek Drive and Via Industria.
Recommendation:
(Check One)
~ Approve with Conditions
D Deny
D Continue for Redesign
D Continue to:
-?
D Recommend Approval with Conditions
D Recommend Denial
CEQA:
(Check One)
I:8J Categorically Exempt
(Class)
32
0 Negative Declaration
0 Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
, PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
LandAm Construction Co.; Carla Polkinhorn
Completion Date:
October 13, 2003
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
June 2, 2004
General Plan Designation:
Business Park (BP)
Zoning Designation:
Light Industrial (LI)
RID 1'\2003\03-0582 Roick Drive Business CenterlSTAfF REPORT,doc
1
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
)
Site:
Office/Warehouse
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant
Vacant and Office/Light Industrial
Vacant and Office/Light Industrial
Vacant
Lot Area:
3.64 acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio
26,104 sq. «./0.16 FAR
Landscape Area/Coverage
34%
Parking Required/Provided
37 spaces required/54 spaces provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
1812.
Staff. has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
The attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment A) has been completed and
staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City-
wide Design Guidelines, and the Development Code.
r8J 1.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting a Development Plan for the construction of a 26,104 square foot
office/warehouse building on 3.64 acres located at the northeast corner of Roick Drive and Via
Industria. The proposed building would be located at the southern portion of the project site,
fronting Roick Drive.
The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan designation of Business Park and zoning
designation of Light Industrial. The building meets the minimum setback requirements of the
Development Code and the proposed lot coverage of 16.5% is well below the maximum allowed
percent of lot coverage of 40 percent. Staff has determined that 37 parking spaces are required
to serve the proposed building, while 54 spaces will be provided. Additionally, staff believes the
distribution of parking is functional, providing access to all building entry points.
Access to the site will be provided from two drive aisles off Roick Drive that will loop around the
proposed building. The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of
the project and determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for
the site by the General Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and
determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site.
The proposed office/warehouse building design is consistent with the Development Code and
Design Guidelines, and is compatible with the industrial and office buildings in the surrounding
area. The proposed one-story building provides multiple building planes, varied parapet heights
R:\D 1'\2003\03.0582 Roick Drive Business Center\STAFF REPORT-doc
2
')
and generous window area at the elevations facing Roick Drive and Via Industria. Canopies
over the windows of these elevations also provide accents, and a patio with an arched metal
frame on cast concrete columns provides a focal point at the front of the building. Roll up doors
providing access to the warehouse areas of the building will be located at the rear of the building
and will be adequately screened from public view by the natural topography of the site and
through the provision of landscape screening. The main body of the concrete building panels
will be painted Dunn-Edwards "Gray Harbor" with Dunn-Edwards "Cloak of White" trim and
Dunn-Edwards "Gallow Glass" accents and painted roll-up doors. The proposed Sunbrella
window awnings will be Burgundy in color and the window glass will be "Solar Gray". The scale
and colors of the building are in proportion and compatible with the surrounding area.
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and
Design Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen onsite parking
areas and effectively soften building elevations. The project proposes to landscape 14,902
square feet or approximately 34.0 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum requirement
of 20 percent in the LI (Light Industrial) zone. The project provides landscaping around the
perimeter of the site, with a 20 foot landscaped setback along Roick Drive and Via Industria and
varied landscape setbacks of three to nine feet at various locations around the building footprint.
Proposed trees include London Plane (15 gallon), Red Crepe Myrtle (36" box), Fern Pine (24"
box), Pink Flowering Locust (15 gallon), and California Pepper (5 gallon) trees and Fortnight Iris
(5 gallon), Variegated Tobira (5 gallon), Escallonia (5 gallon), Daylily (1 gallon), Purple New
Zealand Flax (5 gallon) and Indian Hawthorn (5 gallon) shrubs. A total of 174 trees and 1,358
shrubs are proposed.
I
.....,
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
~1.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 32,
In-Fill Development)
CONCLUSiONlRECOM MENDA TION:
Staff has determined that the proposed office/warehouse building is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Design Guidelines and Development Code. Therefore, staff recommends
approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F)
1.
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Business Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General
Plan has listed the proposed use, including office and storage, as a typical use in the
Business Park designation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations
outlined in the Development Code for the Light Industrial zoning district.
RID P\2oo3\03-0582 Roick Drive Business Center\STAFF REPORT,doc
3
The project has been conditioned by the Building Department and Fire Prevention
Bureau to comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes.
)
2.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Industrial Development Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in
regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Project Review Worksheet - Blue Page 5
2.
Plan Reductions - Blue Page 6
3.
PC Resolution No. 2004- - - Blue Page 7
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
)
R:\D 1'\2003\03-0582 Roick Drive Business CeotetlSTAFF REPORT,doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
R:ID 1'12003\03-0582 Roick Drive Business CentellST AFF RBPORT,doc
5
" ""
\ )
Planning Application Number:
1. General Plan Designation:
2. Zoning Designation:
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Deveiopment Plan
PA03-0582
Business Park (BP)
Consistent?
Yes
Light Industrial (LI)
Consistent?
Yes
3, Environmental Documents Referred to in Making Determination:
0
~
IZ1
0
IZ1
IZ1
IZ1
IZ1
~
~
~
0
0
General Plan EIR
Sensitive Biological Habitat Map
Sensitive Archeological Area Map
Sensitive Paleontological Area Map
Fault Hazard Zone Map
Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazard Map
100 Year Flood Map.
Future Roadway Noise Contour Map
Other (Specify)
Previous EIRlN.D. (Specify Project Name & Approval Date):
Submitted Technical Studies (Specify Name, Author & Date):
"Supplemental Geotechnical Engineering Study; Majewski Property - Roick
Drive Project" prepared by EnGEN Corporation, dated September 4, 2003.
Other:
4, Environmental Determination:
~ 10 Day Review
IZ1 Exempt (Class 32)
0 Mitigated Negative Declaration
0 Negative Declaration
0 EIR
0 20 Day Review
5. General Plan Goals Consistency:
0 30 Day Review
Consistent
¡g¡
IZ1
IZ1
~
Inconsistent
0
0
0
0
Land Use
Circulation
Housing
Growth Management/Public Facilities
R:\D P\2003103.oS82 Roiek Drive Business CenterIPROJECT RE"'IEW WORKSHEET,doe
I
Consistent
~
~
~
~
~
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
Inconsistent
0
0
0
0
0
Public Safety
Noise
Air Quality
Community Design
Economic Development
)
6. City-wide Design Guideline Consistency:
~
Site Plannina:
A. How does the placement of building(s) consider the surrounding area
character?
The proposed building is centrally located on the site, with circulation aisles
and parking looping around the rear of the building. The circulation for the
site allows two points of ingress/egress to the proposed building.
Placement of the proposed building will not impact surrounding properties.
B. How do the structures interface with adjoining properties to avoid creating
nuisances and hazards?
The proposed building is an office/warehouse building and is not anticipated
to create nuisances or hazards. Similar to the site design of surrouding
properties that have been developed, the setback areas along the streets
are landscaped and drive aisles and parking loop around the rear of the
building. Landscaping and a drive aisie for the proposed project will be
placed adjacent to the property located to the east of the project site. A
slope with significant landscaping buffers the site from the property located
to the north, and the building setback from the northern property line is 138
feet. The future extension of Via Industria will be located along the western
boundary of the project site, and Roick Drive is located along the southern
boundary of the site,
........)
j
C. How does the building placement allow buildings rather than parking lots
to define the street edge?
Parking is placed in front of the proposed building, but to minimize its
impact parking is not placed adjacent to the street. A 20 foot landscape
area and 24 foot drive aisle will be placed behind an 11 foot right-of-way
area, providing a total of 55 feet of separation between the street and
proposed parking at the front of the building. The building is set back 67
feet from the front property line (along Roick Drive). Landscaping in the
front setback area includes London Plane trees (15 gallon), Red Crepe
Myrtle, (36" box), Fern Pine (24" box), Fortnight Iris (5 gallon),Escallonia (5
gallon), Daylily (1 gallon), Purple New Zealand Flax, and Indian Hawthorn
(5 gallon) to screen the parking areas.
R:ID P\2003103.oS82 Roiek Drive Business CenterIPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET,doe
2
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
~,
)
0
Parkina and Circulation:
A. How does the parking lot design allow customers and deliveries to reach
the site, circulate through the parking lot, and exit the site easily?
Circulation aisles loop around the building and parking is provided at the
front and rear of the building. The circulation for the site allows two points
of ingress/egress to the proposed building. Two loading spaces are
provided, including one near the northwest corner of the building and one
near the northeast corner of the building.
B. How does the parking lot design provide safe and convenient access to
pedestrians and bicyclists?
Two ADA paths of travel are provided from Roick Drive to the front and
sides of the building. Walkways are provided parallel to the east and west
sides of the building, and 24 foot wide drive aisles also allow for pedestrian
and bicycle traffic.
.......,
C. How are the service facilities within the parking lot screened or buffered
from public view?
The proposed building is a one story office/warehouse building. Proposed
seNice areas are provided at the rear of the building and any visibility to this
area will be screened on site with landscaping along Via Industria.
~
Buildina Architecture:
A. How does the building design provide articulation of the building mass?
Three distinct building planes at the front elevation break up the building
mass. Exterior walls are painted tilt-up concrete panels, with generous
glass elements that accent the elevations of the building facing Roick Drive
and Via Industria. Canopies over the windows of these elevations also
provide accents. A patio with an arched metal frame on cast concrete
columns provide a focal point at the front of the building.
B. How is each building "stylistically" consistent with all buildings in a
complex, and on all elevations to achieve design harmony and continuity
within itself?
The proposed building is not a part of a complex. All elevations incorporate
the same colors and the materials utilized for each elevation, including
concrete tilt-up panels, glass, and metal roll-up doors (at the rear elevation).
R:ID 1'12003\03-0582 Roick Drive Business CenterlPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET,doc
3
PROJECT REViEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
C. How does the placement of buildings create a more functional or useful
open space between the buildings and/or the street?
The building exceeds the setback requirement for the U Zone, thereby
allowing for a wide landscaped buffer between the building and the street.
The required front setback (from Roick Drive) is 20 feet, and the proposed
building setback is 67 feet. The required side setback (from Via Industria) is
also 20 feet, and the proposed building setback is 50 feet.
D. How do each of the architectural elements (building base, windows,
doors and openings, cornice and parapet, roofline, and finish materials
meet the intent of the design guidelines?
The building has generous window area, a defined entryway, a parapet wall
with rolled cap that will adequately screen rooftop equipment, and a varied
roof/ine. Building materials include concrete tilt-up panels with generous
window area and extensive use of tinted glass. Colors are balanced and
enhance the character of the building.
t81
Landscapina:
A. Does the plan provide the following ratio ofplantings?
t81 Yes 0 No, why?
.......,
Trees
10% 36" Box
30% 24" Box
60% 15 Gallon
Groundcover
100% Coverage
In One Year
Shrubs
100% 5 Gallon
B. Does the landscaped area, ratio, spacing, and size conform with the
design guidelines? 121 Yes 0 No
C. How does the internal site landscaping frame the building(s) and
separate them from the surrounding pavements?
Three to five foot, wide landscape areas are located along the sides and
front of the builidng, along with landscape areas at the ends of the parking
area at the front of the building that help to frame the building. Landscaping
in these areas includes Fern Pine and Red Crepe Myrtle trees,and Fortnight
Iris, Variegated Tobira Daylily, and Indian Hawthorn shrubs. Additionally,
landscaping in the parking lot area adjacent to the building ties into the
landscaping surrounding the building, as does the landscaping in front
setback area.
D. How does the patio and street' furniture, fixtures, walls and fences integrate
with of the architecture and landscaping?
R:\D P\2003\O3-O582 Roiek Drive Business CenterlPROJECJ' REVIEW WORKSHEET,doc
4
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
t-)
The project does not propose patio and street furniture or fences. An 11
foot high retaining wall to be located at the rear of the site will be screened
from public view by the proposed building and on-site landscaping along Via
Industria. Furthermore, the retaining wall wíl1 be a planted crib wall that will
be planted with Rosemary or other hanging plant(s).
7. Development Code Consistency:
A. How does the plan achieve the performance standards specified in Code
Section 17.08.070?
Circulation:
Vehicular access is oriented from side streets rather than from a major
arterial. Where possible, separate vehicular and pedestrian circulation
systems have been provided. A looped circulation system is proposed to
provide easy access to and from the proposed project. The Fire Department
has reviewed the proposed project and determined that the proposed
circulation is adequate to provide access for emergency vehicles.
Architectural Desian:
......¡
The building has been designed to avoid excessive mass and bulk. This
has been accomplished with the provision of various building planes, varying
roof heights and the use of various building materials, including substantial
use of giass, that provide visual breaks in the building and provide building
articulation.
Site Plannina and Desian:
Conflicts between pedestrian and vehicular traffic have been minimized with
the provision of sidewalks and drive aisles with a minimum width of 24 feet.
Two loading spaces are provided at the, rear of the site. Landscaping and
berming will be provided to screen the loading spaces and retaining wall at
the rear of the site.
Compatibilitv:
The proposed building is not situated adjacent to residential uses. The
project site is surrounded by other office and light industrial uses and
undeveloped property that is zoned Light Industrial (LI) that will be
compatable with the proposed building.
B. Does the application and submitted plans on file conform with all of the
applicable minimum development standards?
)
R:\D P\2003103.o582 Roiek Drive Bosiness CenterlPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET.doe
5
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
[g Yes, with conditions
0 No
)
Net Lot Area:
Total Floor Area:
Floor Area Ratio:
Lot Coverage:
2.91 acres
26,104 square feet
0.16
16.5%
Hillside/Slope
Arch.lPaleo
Fault Zone
Flood
Noise
Traffic
Habitat
Subs.lLiqfctn
Stream/Creek
Air Quality
--j
I. ~
North Office/Light Light Industrial (LI) Business Park (BP)
Industrial
East Office/Light Light Industrial (LI) Business Park (BP)
Industrial '
West Office Licht Industrial (LI) Business Park (BP\
South Vacant and Light Industrial (LI) Business Park (BP)
Office/Light
Industrial
R:\D P12003103-0582 Roiek Drive Business CenterlPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET,doc
6
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PLAN REDUCTIONS
RID 1'12003103-0582 Roick Drive Business CentellST AFF REPORT,doc
6
--s~~,¡;,.-o
-.-w'",""", """""'"
~~',
dIOIÐ YIØ"Mf1't'
;:;:~ 1- i .~
- da~;:~
,-,."
i i I-~::
.
.
II -
1¡llli
~;I~, ii,!
h! ~ :!f!
III;
" , ,
II!!
~
°1
@¡:dl
~!
~!
::EI
~I
.
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
1
i
I
'" i
dB . i
: in ~ ~I
In I ~.. I
III II! !! - I ;
¡I;;;;;; I I I
~" ;::.du . ..! i
I
':~~ !!!!!! I i~' I
:: ~ i!
II I i
i
1
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
~IJ II~I
Cd I hi
~.. '1;-
Ii .;
li~'!-i;
11m !JI,'
d~~B!
()
"""
. --_-"
lUlU
§ - d
~ Ilulll
grill f
.. ..... ..
I
hi
'I '
hI
" ,
I r I
III i Ills
IIII '
hi! I
;IIJi~i
I' I
PI' I
! I! ' i~'
i II If i ì~1
IJ' ~ s ¡r
s " .
f I ~ Ii
E' ...
0
". ~
. .!J' ~I~
I~¡ J)
~
,;::~
~
( )
8
(0
Iltl!' ¡III
'~. 'III
. III ~ ~ d I II I i,l ~'..
! ~!!II~! .1 !~ Ii Ir. h¡ ¡liill M 1'ldI~~
¡ ( J MII!lIf dl' i hil w!1I t I I
Iii IIII..! I, ¡'II
;~! I III I
~.. 5 I
0; ~ "1
1 '
i
"'¡:::J;ò
;¡j~;:
~~~"
;::0;>0
(
I Þ
~
I.a.
-------i'---K"J----
~
, ii'
. ' OM
-.,.._--+.,---~----
~
k
. V1___-
--------r-----~
~
¡¡
--...-,,--}q..--. ,""
-----..s;"---I!I.----
.. I KìJ
k
it
e
hi
~ la .1
~, ' ~II:
a I '
~
;¡;
I . ~ '
: I'~j
'gj"..'.
. ~'¡ '.',
"~i~ ,
~.~~, .'
z
:59
(L::-
o:i
§r
'Ii.
,N
I~
0
~
hI
i!i
"a~
u
õ
'"
"
-
, ..
( )
BB!II!EI
I
i
@
,z
a
¡:::
u
W
tn'
~
¡:::
~
w
--',
W
I-
tn
~
z
a
¡:::
«
>'
~
W
I-
tn
«
w
~
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004.-
R:\D 1'12003\03-0582 Roick Drive Business CenterlSTAFFREPORT.doc
7
()
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004--
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-0582, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A
26,104 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON
3.64 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
ROICK DRIVE AND VIA INDUSTRIA (APN 909-320-060)
WHEREAS, Dean Davidson, representing LandAm Construction Company, filed
Planning Application No. PA03-0582, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General
Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA03-0582 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA03-0582 on June 2, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA03-0582 subject to the
conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PAO3-0582
conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
--7
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application
No. 03-0443 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Business Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General
Plan has listed the proposed use, including office and storage, as a typical use in the
Business Park designation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations
outlined in the Development Code for the Light Industrial zoning district. The project has
been conditioned by the Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to comply with
all applicable Building and Fire Codes.
)
R,\D 1'\2003\03-0582 Roick Drive Business CenterlST AFF REPORT,doc
8
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
)
The project is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the City
of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards outlined the City of
Temecula Development Code. The architecture and site layout for the project has been
reviewed utilizing the Industrial Development Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The project has met the performance standards in regards to
circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project is exempt from
environmental review based on Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California
Environmental Quality Act. There are no potentially significant environmental constraints on the
site; the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning regulations; is
located on a site within the city limits, which is served by all utilities; and is less than 5 acres in
area.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA03-0582 (Development Plan) to construct a
26,104 square foot office/warehouse building with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit
A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all
necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 2nd day of June 2004.
-J
John Telesio, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
)
R:\D 1'\2003\03-0582 Roick Drive Busioess CenterlSTAFF REPORT-doc
9
()
, \
--¡
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of June, 2004, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D 1'12003\03-0582 Roick Drive Business Ceoter\ST AFF REPORT,doc
10
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:ID 1'\2003\03-0582 Roick Drive Business Cent<JIST AFP REPORT,doc
, 11
()
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA03-0582
Project Description:
A Development Plan to construct a 26,104 square foot
office building on 3.64 acres located at the northeast
corner of Roick Drive and Via Industria.
DiF Category:
MSHCP Category:
Office
Industrial
Assessor's Parcel No:
909-320-060
Approval Date:
June 2, 2004
Expiration Date:
June 2, 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
y
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1.
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning
Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void
by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
2.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
R:\D 1'12003\03-0582 Roiek Drive Business CenterlST AFF REPORT,doc
12
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The applicant shall sign two copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and
return one signed copy to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for their files.
All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this Development Plan.
A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year
extensions of time, one year at a time.
10.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits B
(Site Plan), C (Floor Plan), D (Elevations), E (Landscape Plan) and F (Color and
Materials) contained on file with the Planning Department.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being
placed below the surrounding parapet wall.
11.
Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site.
12.
Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
13.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
14.
The retaining wall along the northern boundary of the parking lot shall be a planted crib
wall as depicted on the preliminary grading plan for this application. Planting of the wall
shall include Rosemary or other hanging plant(s).
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted
directly below and with Exhibit "P' (Color and Materials Board), contained on file with the
Community Development Department - Planning Division.
Concrete (walls) - Main Body Dunn-Edwards DE-1074 (Gray Harbor)
Concrete (walls) - Wall Trim Dunn-Edwards DE-1076 (Cloak of White)
15.
R:ID 1'\2003\03-0582 Rojek Drive Busioes, CenterlSTAFF REPORT-doc
13
Wall Accent & Metal Doors
Roll-Up Doors
Window Canopies
Storefront Glazing - Main
Dunn-Edwards DE-1086 (Gallow Glass)
Dunn-Edwards DE-1071 (Glen Eagle)
Sunbrella 4631 (Burgundy)
Aluminum clear anodized with "Solar Gray"
glass
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
16.
17.
18.
19.
-
20.
Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector
check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department which
meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact
the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works
Department and Planning Department.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural
resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of
cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately
advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at
his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems
reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully
qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the
significance of the find. Upon determining that the find is not an archaeological/cultural
resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination
and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other
corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. This condition of
approval shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading
permit.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
21.
A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
22.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Exhibit "E", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown.
R:ID 1'\2003\03-0582 Roiek Drive Business CenteI\STAFF REPORT,doc
14
23.
24.
25.
26.
The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details
the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth
and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The
approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance
contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
All utilities and light poles shall be shown and labeled on the landscape plans and
appropriate screening shall be provided. A three-foot (3.0') clear zone shall be provided
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion.
b.
c.
d.
e.
The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all
utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
-
27.
The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing
plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The
numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow
paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street
and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
The construction plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International
Orange".
Prior to Release of Power
28.
Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, all required
landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved
landscape plan (Exhibit "E"). The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or
pests and the irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
The property owner shall submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount
approved by the Planning Department for a period of one year from the date of the
release of power or first occupancy permit.
29.
30.
Prior to release of power, all site improvements including but not limited to parking areas
and striping shall be installed.
R:ID 1'12003\03-0582 Roick Drive Bosiness CeoteI\STAFF REPORT,doc
15
31.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
32.
33.
34.
35.
A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City
Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to drive approaches,
b. Storm drain facilities.
c.
Sewer and domestic water systems
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
36.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
37.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
38.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
39.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or, proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
R:ID P\2003\03-0582 Roiek Drive Business CentetlST AFF REPORT,doc
16
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
The Developer shall underground all storm drain outlets to the nearest existing storm
drain system unless otherwise approved per the Department of Public Works.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Planning Department
b. Department of Public Works
The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc..., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the
land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for
review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage
facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage
easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating
"draining easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
46.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of T emecula Standard No. 207 A.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800.
Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard No. 400.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
b.
c.
d.
e.
R:ID 1'12003\03-0582 Roiek Drive Business Center\STAFF REPORT,doc
17
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department
of Public Works.
The Developer shall vacate and dedicate the abutters rights of access along Roick Drive
pursuant to the new locations of the driveways.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of Public Works for any street closure and detour
or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Enginèer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object
to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge
and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western
Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
54.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b.
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
c.
55.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
56.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
57.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
R:\D 1'\2003\03-0582 Roiek Drive Business CenteI\ST AFF REPORT,doc
18
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County
area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this
ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the
time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance
03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April
1,1998)
---,
64.
65.
Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
66.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
67.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
prior to permit issuance.
68.
69.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
70.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
71.
Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons
with disabilities.
R:\D 1'\2003\03-0582 Rojek Drive Business CenteIlST AFF REPORT-doc
19
72.
73.
74.
75.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the
approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
Show all building setbacks.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any
site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
FIRE DEPARTMENT
76.
77.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions ' will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2125 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 3975 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A)
78.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
79.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required. (CFC 903.2)
80.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
R:ID 1'12003\03-0582 Roiek Drive Business CenterlSTAFF REPORT,doc
20
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
86.
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via
all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
--,
87.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family
residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
88.
89.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
R\D 1'12003\03-0582 Roick Drive Business Center\STAFFREPORT,doc
21
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
---J
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article
81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
95.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the
developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground
tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other
hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention
Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
96.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for approval.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
97.
98.
The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
RID 1'12003\03-0582 Roick Drive Business CenteJIST AFP REPORT,doc
22
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
General Conditions
99.
100.
101.
All perimeter landscaping, fencing and on site lighting within this development, shall be
maintained by the property owner or a private maintenance association.
The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash
enclosure areas.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris, Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
102.
103.
Prior to building permit the developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements
made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
If additional streetlights are to be installed, as a result of this project, then prior to the first
building permit or installation of additional street lighting whichever occurs first, the
developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit an approved Edison
Streetlight Plan and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of street
lighting into the TCSD maintenance program.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
104.
105.
106.
The, applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated March 23, 2004 from the
Southern California Gas Company.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated October 22, 2003 from the
Department of Environmental Health.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated October 17, 2003 from Rancho
Water.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand, and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Printed Name
Date
Applicant's Signature
R:ID P\2003\O3-oS82 Rojek Drive Business CenterlSTAFF REPORT,doe
23
-r-
M - '-}'----,,}
"-
Sauthem
C.lifomie
,,' Ga-
A ~ Sempra Energy" company
March 23, 2004
City of Temecula
Planning Department
P.O. Box 9003
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
RE: VARIOUS LOCATIONS
.....,
PA03-Q464 -Development Plan
29748 Rancho California Rd
l!ìîi~M~1- Development Plan Over 10,000 S.F.
28461 Old Town Front Street
PA03-QS01 - Subdivide a 9.25 acre Commercial
N/W Comer of Margarita Rd & North General Kearney Rd
PÄiiía.:Gsfst.. Condominiums ,
Slside of Remington Avenue -900' W/Diaz Rd
PA03-Q534 -Office Bldg
Ridge Park Drive, South of Rancho California Rd
PA03-Q53~ Development Plan
Slside of 5 St & W/Front Street
PA03-Q545 - Development Plan -Dalton Historic Bldg
N/W Comer of Main 5t & Mercedes St
PA03-Q552 - Development Plan -Condominium
N/W Comer of Tierra Vista Rd & Ynez Ad
'PA03~O582'" Development Plan
N/side of Roiek Drive - Winchester Rd
PAOS.06S64'Condominium
TPM 31960, WE Corner of levo Dr & Winchester Ad
PA03-0677 - Margarita Professional Bldg
SlE Corner of Pauba Rd & Margarita Rd
Souhrn ~
Gas Coq>any
9mQkh1eA-
~G4.
91313
Mi1Iünt -
P.O.Bœ23œ
~G4.
91313-2300
ML9314
tel 818-7014546
Þ 818-701-3#1
I
/
'-,
.city of Temecula
Page 2
,3l~¡~~$$Ø~~ Highlands TPM
Slside of County Center Drive - Ynez Rd
.~~~~~%ubdivide
Planning Ärea 7 of the Wolf Creek Specific Plan
PWOD-26 - Bridge
Murrieta Creek Bridge & overland Drive Extension
Desert Region Transmission, a division of Southern California Gas
Company', has no conflict with your proposed improvements. However,
our Distnbution department may have some facilities within your
construction area. To assure no conflict with the local distribution's
pipeline system, please contact (909) 335-7725. .
I will forward your letter and drawings to expedite your response. If you
need additional information or assistance, please call.
Sincerely,
~~UiS' ,
Pipeline Pia n ng Assistant
Transmissi epartment
---
oc:
VRoss
~~
COUNIY OF RIVERSIDE. HEALTh ....¿RVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
October 22, 2003
\i~1~ì~7t~
I, Ucr' 11,,(,'
l'" 2 7 200 //Ii
'" 13 jtI;
i~k'<",- ~~/!
-',",'i~~,-. .
..,_._-'~
City of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Stuart Fisk
RE:
Plot Plan No. PA03-O582
Dear Mr. Harris:
L Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PAOO-0582 to construct
two commercial buildings and has no objections. Water and sewer services should be available
in this area.
2. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD
BE REQUIRED:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts.
b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete
sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule,
a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food
Facility Plan Examiners at (909) 600-6330.
c) If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Department of
Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (600-6333) will be
required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
. Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617 A.
. Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3.
. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2).
. Waste reduction management.
~
Sam Martinez, Supervising Environmental Health Specialist
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
cc:
4065 County Circle Drive. Riverside, CA 92503 . Phone (909) 358-5316 . FAX (909) 358-5017
(Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600. Riverside, CA 92513-7600) p,;",d""ry<I,dpa",,@
@
BaDcha
'*
Boa'" om;""""
Job. Eo H-.....
S,. v;", p",.;....
Stepbe. J. eo....
RalpbH.DaIly
BealL Dnke
LIaa D. H.......
C.." F. Ko
Olf_,
PbillipLFo""
I.terim Com~1 M..-
n;""", or "nama. .......",
E.P."90"'Lemo-
n;""",orE_..
......... C. Dealy
""""""otO"""",,,,
" M.I.....~
"""' IL Louck
cO....""
LInda M. F.......
n;....." Seaeta",/Adm;.I...."..
...,..;~ M......
C.'MJ,...leo~tt
Be.. Beat " Krieger UP
""..,,1 Co.~1
h
October 17,2003
Stuart Fisk, Project Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
~TæfŒ f] W œmì
¡Un! OCT 2 1 2003 .1.lii II'
iL IJ
By
SUBJECT:
WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY
A PORTION OF PARCEL NO.1 OF PARCEL MAP 28084
AND PARCEL NO.4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28471
APN 909-320-060; ROICK DRIVE BUSINESS PARK
Dear Mr. Fisk:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water and sewer
service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site
and/or off-site water and sewer facilities and the completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD fòr fees
and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property
owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if
any, to RCWD.
-
This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium site with
individual building owners and a homeowners' association maintaining the
coinmon property and private water and fire protection facilities. As a condition
of the project, RCWD requires that the City of Temecula include a Reciprocal
BãSèment and Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water facilities.
In addition to this agreement, RCWD will require individual water meters for
each buildingif a condominiùm conversion takes place.
If you shòuld have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
~{S~
Steve Brannon, P.E. ,
Development Engineering Manager
03\SB:0I251IFCF
c:
Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Bud Jones, Engineering Project Coordinator
Ra.,boCaI;"'~i.W."r"""""
'2135WI~h""'Roa' . _0111",&.9017' T""""'..Caur=la"""9017' 1909) 29J!.<9OO. FAX (909) 29&6860
ITEM #5
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date of Meeting:
June 2, 2004
Prepared by:
Dan Long
Title: Associate Planner
File Number
PA04-0152
Application Type:
CUP/DP
Recommendation:
A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a
13,777 square foot school facility on 4.37 acres located at 29275
Santiago Road
~, Approve with Conditions
Project Description:
D Deny
D Continue for Redesign
D Continue to:
D Recommend Approval with Conditions
D Recommend Denial
---i
CEQA:
~ Categorically Exempt
(Class)
15332
D Negative Declaration
D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
MDMG, Inc., Mike Richter
Completion Date:
March 5, 2004
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
June 5, 2004
General Plan Designation:
Service Commercial/Public Institutional
Zoning Designation: Rancho Highlands Specific Plan (Public Institutional) / Service
Commercial
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Recreation field/Private School
R:IC U P\2004104-0152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
1
North:
South:
East:
West:
Single Family Residential
Religious Institution
Religious Institution/Private School
Interstate 15 Freeway
Lot Area:
4.37 acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio
.173
Landscape Area/Coverage
48.7%
Parking Required/Provided
55
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
i:8J 1.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
ANALYSIS
The proposed project includes a Conditional Use Permit and a Development Plan for a 13,777
square foot private school building. The proposed building will include 9 new classrooms, a
science lab, offices and a conference room. The project site currently includes four buildings,
including a library, multi-purpose room, offices, and classrooms. The site also includes a parking
lot and play areas.
Staff has identified two areas of concern for the proposed project: noise and parking.
Noise: Staff was concerned about noise impacts from Interstate 15 and from Santiago Road.
The applicant has submitted a noise study (Hillcrest Noise Study Draft Report, dated May, 6,
2004). The primary noise generator is traffic from Interstate 15 Freeway and Santiago Road. The
noise study has provided recommendations to bring the interior noise levels of the proposed
building to a less than significant level (45 CNEL). The recommendations from the noise study
are included in the conditions of approval. The noise levels for the outdoor play areas are
currently in accordance with the noise element of the General Plan (70 CNEL).
Parkina: The proposed project requires a total of 55 parking spaces. A total of 46 spaces are
proposed. Staff has included a condition of approval for a shared parking agreement to be
recorded with the adjacent church property for the nine additional spaces. Staff has analyzed the
parking issue and has determined that there will be no impact as a result of fewer parking
spaces proposed. The proposed project will not create a net increase in student population and
the total number of classrooms will not increase. There are a total of nine existing classrooms
and there are nine classrooms proposed in the new building.
The nine existing classrooms will be converted to storage space. Staff has included a condition
of approval that requires the existing classrooms to be converted to storage and shall remain as
storage and not for student occupation. The multi-purpose room and library will remain as they
currently exist.
R:IC U P\2004104-0152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
2
The project site maintains access from two points off of Santiago Road. An existing parking lot is
located to the north and west of the existing and proposed school buildings. An existing salvage
yard on a separate lot is located between the proposed classroom building and the existing
parking lot. Direct vehicular access to the classrooms is provided directly from Santiago Road.
Access points will not change as a result of the proposed project
The applicant has proposed a craftsman architectural style. The main entries include raised
gables with stone columns and exposed beams. The base of the building includes a stone base
to match the columns and a pre-cast concrete moulding cap. The primary wall surface is stucco.
The applicant has also proposed multi-paned windows with bronze mullions and wood trellises
over the windows. The roof design is a low pitch roof with asphalt shingles. The applicant has
also proposed decorative wall mounted light fixtures at each main entry of the building.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
I8J 1.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class
15332, infill)
CONCLUSION/RECOMM ENDA TION
Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Planning Application No.
PA04-0152 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan) based upon the findings and the
attached Conditions of Approval.
~
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F)
1.
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Temecula, the
Rancho Highlands Specific Plan, the Development Code and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City of Temecula because the
project has been reviewed and it has been determined that the project is consistent with
all applicable zoning ordinances, state law and the General Plan.
2.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare, because the project has been designed to minimize any
adverse impacts upon the surrounding neighborhood and the project has been reviewed
and conditioned to comply with the uniform building and fire codes.
Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.040.010E)
1.
The proposal, a private school building, is consistent with the land use designation and
policies reflected in the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and land use standards in the
City of Temecula General Plan and the City's Development Code. The site is therefore
properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of the
proposed use. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
R:IC U P\2004\O4.o152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT.doc
3
2.
The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition ad development of
adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures because the project site is an
addition to an existing school facility. The building is designed to blend with the
surrounding development and therefore will not adversely affect the adjacent uses,
buildings or structures.
The site of this proposed conditional use is an addition to an existing private school
facility. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed school
without affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development
features prescribed in the Development Code.
3.
4.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit includes an addition to an existing private school
facility. The nature of this use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare
of the community because the proposed project is providing a service that is need in the
surrounding community and it has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts,
including health, safety and general welfare to the community.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Plan Reductions - Blue Page 5
PC Resolution No. 2004 - - - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
2.
----
3.
PC Resolution No. 2004 - - - Blue Page 16
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
'R:IC U P\2004\O4-0152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R:IC U P\2004104.o152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT.doc
5
e
~
-::,;;" '7,;:,,~=:-' 0 (0
,.rl18M,H;;' ~NV1 ! -----: ,
<fi) Ð VII8I'M-Il\f ~'......, ~
----_......~""""'" ~~'í.
--- a;; ,~
J.II3CJVOV !S3U:>TIH ....., "] II I;¡ :5;i :;? ¡
AYeaVOV J.S3II:)~ <3'aW H a ; ~ 0
)
II;
'..
UI
--ì
""
aaa a
~H~
~ ¡
~ ¡ii I
Ii inl
i i p::
.
)
i" ~!
d.'N
I 'I Ii! i
mil I~;I~ !!!;
..,n Ihl~ '.'-
,
I 1,1
I' JI ,:
¡'II 1.1
II~IMI
,!C Ilii
I !~ !!I;¡; !
~i:
, Iii
!n
!t i
:¡¡¡ ! ;~
,ú mim Iii
Ii ;;;;¡¡¡ ~
,.". E.'~'" H
..
I : ~~ !!!~!!! ~!
z
:3
0..
01
z.
, ~i
~ :3.
ta..l
- >-
~i
~!
:Jj
~I
0...
I
,
i
I
I
I
I
¡
i
i
i
I
.
,
I
I
i
I
.
I
.
i
I
.
.
I
¡
I
.
.
I
i
i
I
I
I
i
.
.
I
I
I
i
j
i!. ~III
fnl~fl ~~ ß'II~ I ill åld! II I ,
. mIl ill~¡-lmli! 1;1 11111' I ., i II e I
Ii (' i HI Uiih ~ UM . .... ;~ !¡ i : : lOa IH I!IV I ! II ~ at I'I'I'~
I "II" fill Iii hI"
Ig II'hllll; U I' n'l I ~ ß" g II In
1'1111111111 I II I I !g1~i¡'P ml!~IIIÖ! ¡ol! I¡ll
1111111111111 II d It I~I'¡~~II II!lU ø~ili[ 1IIIniJm~i,li~iliJ
, Illm.Holml I 11111- ~~ I.~. ...~I. ~.:I. .9
I
~
III1
IIII
~!
~
i
I .
.~ ø: i
I -
(
I
,~ //. J
1,1
~111
I!'I
111I1Il!
"""1 f
;!I!r ¡II
IIIII II.
i!ll! 1'1
;'"111,
.ili Ii;
lUll!! ~I.I.~I.. ~II ~~III
~ ~ --~ I !SII ,111.,
I. ~'m'~2. II
) ~ I,; It 'dllltr.U",I.. I ~~
1ft II, itl ¡I, I I. ~ ~
1111191111 I I !. iI , r
I liD I!I ~III!I IIII i II! ~ I ud DII IIIII!! ~ d k1 ~ !fl
II I II I øhDU I iii I 1..11 D 1- ....
I
IL
I
~~~!
II~
~Wll
I~
I
t
~i
~
II
If
~i
I
I
;'11. ~II
II. II
IIII I I
~II! 1'1
å' ",ll.
Iii. Ii;.
,/"
~
f!! ¡
'I ~ ~
h~
j~ ~
~~g
.. z
~Î~
h~
N~ ....
. ~~
8z
f>
----
~
I~
gn
!f;;
~C/)
~~
g;J>
1:("')
~P-1
p.,
('t)
~
II
'fj~
fil~
~JI
u.
II
þ1
~
. -- - -- -- K -- - -.. - - K - Kn - -. -- K - -. K-
¡;¡ I PERSPECTIVE RENDERING
~~CADEMY
I,. ~""'WITZ""OCJA_INC.~~::::""
~ ---
-- -~"""'---
I .... ~ """'--
-~ """'--
=.t=.:.t.\t ::::: ===~-;
~ -. --- - -. -- ~ -.. -. --... - -. -- - --..-
I
j
!
¡;
0
'"
~
---r------ ')
~@II
¿
~
I. ~IIIOIIOWITZ'ASSOCIA""IIIC.~=---=:-
~ =- =-=- =--
I :=.t~.tIt == ~---=-
mlBUllDING FLOOR PLAN
~~CADEMY
,
-
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - -
R:IC U P\2004104-0152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA04-0152, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
FOR A 13,m SQUARE FOOT SCHOOL FACILITY, LOCATED
AT 29275 SANTIAGO ROAD.
WHEREAS, MDMG, Inc. filed Planning Application No. PA04-0152, in a manner in
accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA04-0152 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, inthe time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA04-0152 on June 2,2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion 01 the Planning Commission Hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No.
PA04-0152 subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning
Application No. PAO4-0152 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
---!
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application
No. PA04-0152 (Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by
Section 17.04.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the
Development Code;
The proposal, a private school building, is consistent with the land use designation and
policies reflected in the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and land use standards in the
City of Temecula General Plan and the City's Development Code. The site is therefore
properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of the
proposed use. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and
development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will
not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures;
R:IC U P\2004104-0152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT.doc
7
The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition ad development of
adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures because the project site is an
addition to an existing school facility. The building is designed to blend with the
surrounding development and therefore will not adversely affect the adjacent uses,
buildings or structures.
C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping
and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the
Planning Commission, or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood;
The site of this proposed conditional use is an addition to an existing private school
facility. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed school
without affecting the yard, parking and, landscaping, and other development features
prescribed in the Development Code.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety
and general welfare of the community;
The proposed Conditional Use Permit includes an addition to an existing private school
facility. The nature if this use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare
of the community because the proposed project is providing a service that is need in the
surrounding community and it has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts,
including health, safety and general welfare to the community.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared
and adopted by the Director of Planning in accordance with Class 32, Section 15332 of CEOA
Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review if required for the proposed project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves Planning Application No.PA04-0152 (Conditional Use Permit) located at 29275
Santiago Road, subject to the conditions of approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference together with any other conditions that may be deemed
necessary.
R:IC U P\2004\O4.o152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
8
)
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 2nd day of June 2004.
John Telesio, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of June 2004, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\C U P\2004104.0152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
9
EXHIBiT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(Conditional Use Permit)
R:IC U P\2004\O4-0152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT.doc
10
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA04-0152 (Conditional Use Permit)
Project Description:
A Conditional Use Permit for a 13,777 square foot
school facility, located at 29275 Santiago Road
Development Impact Fee: Commercial
Approval Date:
June 2, 2004
June 2, 2006
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1.
--;
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to tile the Notice of
Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
2.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
3.
RIG U P\2004104-0152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT.doc
11
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The Director of Planning may. upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three, one-year
extensions of time. one year at a time.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff. and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated February 27.2004,
(attached) on file with the Planning Department, unless superceded by these conditions
of approval.
This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this Conditional Use Permit.
The applicant shall submit a final noise study to verify that the proposed project will
comply with maximum noise attainable levels outlined in the City's Noise Element in the
General Plan (Max. 45 db CNEL interior space and Max. 70 db CNEL outdoor play
areas).
-
10.
If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeologicaVcultural
resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of
cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately
advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at
his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems
reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully
qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the
significance of the find. Upon determining that the determination is not an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining
that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall
notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until
a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of
Planning.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
11.
Landscaping: Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding the building are kept at
a height of no more than three feet (3') or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants,
hedges and shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from
breaking into the building utilizing lower level windows.
a. Applicant should ensure all trees surrounding the building roof top be kept at a
distance so as to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Trees also act
R:IC U P\2004104.o152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
12
12.
13.
14.
15.
--I
16.
17.
as a natural ladder. Prune tree branches with at least a 6 feet clearance from the
building.
Any burms should not exceed 3' in height.
The placement of all landscaping should comply with guidelines from Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED).
Lighting: All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex should be energy-saving and
minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting
Ordinance. Furthermore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting
Requirements.
a. All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above.
The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one (1) foot candle of light at
ground level, evenly dispersed.
b.
c.
Hardware: All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous
hardware shall be commercial or institution grade.
Graffiti: Any graffiti painted or marked upon the building shall be removed or painted
over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Notify the Temecula Police
Department immediately so a report can be taken.
Alarm System: Upon completion of construction, the building shall have a monitored
alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm
company, to notify the police department immediately of any intrusion.
Roof Hatches: All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
Public Telephones: Any public telephones located on the exterior of the building should
be placed in a well-lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature
to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the
interior of the building.
18.
Marked Parking for Disabled Vehicles: All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall
be marked in accordance with section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
19.
Crime Prevention:
a.
All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their
booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association
1127-11th Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal
Code 490.5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a
civil demand program.
Business desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the
crime prevention unit of the Temecula Police Department.
b.
R:IC U Pl2004104-0152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
13
c.
Employee training regarding retail theft, credit card prevention, citizen's arrest
procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related
crime prevention training procedures are also available through the crime
prevention unit.
Any business that serves or sell any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with
all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines
associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the
Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees and
owners. This includes special events held at business location where alcohol will
be serviced for a fee and the event is open to the general public.
The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to
participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less than $40.00 for
inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a
personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of
the business-advising customers of the "Inkless Ink program in use". If the
business becomes a victim of check fraud, the police department will be able to
track the suspect with the thumbprint.
d.
e.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
20.
21.
22.
23.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to
the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed
so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
R:\C U P\2004104.o152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
14
24.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any
site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Date
Applicant's Name
Applicant's Printed Name
--.¡
R:IC U P\2004104.o152 Hillcresl AcademylSTAFF REPORT.doc
15
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - -
R:IC U P\2004104.o152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT.doc
16
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004--
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA04-0152, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR A
13,m SQUARE FOOT SCHOOL FACILITY INSTITUTION,
LOCATED AT 29275 SANTIAGO ROAD
WHEREAS, MDMG, Inc., filed Planning Application No. PA04-0152, in a manner in
accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA04-0152 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA04-0152 on June 2,2004 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission Hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No.
PA04-0152 subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning
Application No. PA04-0152 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application
No. PAO4-0152 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the Genera Plan for Temecula and with
all the applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city;
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Temecula, the
Rancho Highlands Specific Plan, The Development Code and with all applicable
requirements of state law ands other ordinances of the City of Temecula because the
project has been reviewed and it has been determined that the project is consistent with
all applicable zoning ordinances, state law and the General Plan.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public,
health, safety and general welfare.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare, because the project has been designed to minimize any
adverse impacts upon the surrounding neighborhood and the project has been reviewed
and conditioned to comply with the uniform building and fire codes.
R:\C U P\2004\O4.o152 Hillcresl AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
17
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared
and adopted by the Director of Planning in accordance with Class 32, Section 15332 of CEQA
Guidelines. Whereas, no further environmental review if required for the proposed project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves Planning Application No. PA04-0152 (Development Plan) located at 29275 Santiago
Road, subject to the conditions of approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference together with any other conditions that may be deemed
necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission on this 2nd day of June 2004.
John Telesio, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of June 2004, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:IC U P\2004104.o152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
18
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDiTIONS OF APPROVAL
(Development Plan)
R:\C U P\2004\04-O15211ilIcrest AcademylST AFF REPORT,dOC
19
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA04-0152 (Development Plan)
Project Description:
A Development Plan for a 13,777 square foot school
facility, located at 29275 Santiago Road.
Development Impact Fee: Service Commercial
Approval Date:
June 2, 2004
Expiration Date:
June 2, 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1.
--¡
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c».
General Requirements
2.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages' resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
R:\C U 1'\2004\04-0152 Hillcrest Academy\STAFF REPORT,doc
20
4.
5.
6.
7.
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three, one-year
extensions of time, one year at a time.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan,
contained on file with the Planning Department.
Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved (Conceptual Landscape Plan)
contained on file with the Planning Department. Landscaping installed for the project
shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of
Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of
Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping
into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all
landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in
interest.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
8.
This Development Plan may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.05.010 of the City's
Development Code.
--j
9.
Automatic shut-off of water and electrical systems, except for security and fire protection,
shall be provided during non-business hours.
If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural
resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of
cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately
advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at
his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems
reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully
qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the
significance of the find. Upon determining that the determination is not an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining
that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall
notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until
a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of
Planning.
10.
11.
The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department
inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
The elevations shall be revised to include an additional gable along the elevation facing
Santiago Road, subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
12.
R:\C U 1'\2004\04-0152 Hillcrest AcademylST AFF REPORT,doc
21
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
----"
20.
A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a final noise study to
verify that the proposed project will comply with maximum noise attainable levels
outlined in the City's Noise Element in the General Plan (Max. 45 db CNEL interior
space and Max. 70 db CNEL outdoor play areas).
The applicant shall show and appropriately note all existing landscaping to remain on the
plans.
The applicant shall show all existing trees on the plans and indicate their disposition (i.e.
to be removed; to be replaced; to be relocated). Plans shall be modified as appropriate
to save existing trees where feasible and as approved by the City.
Provide erosion control matting on all proposed slopes to provide stabilization while new
plants establish.
Provide appropriate construction details for the fencing along Santiago Road. Materials,
fencing height, etc. shall be as approved by the City's Planning Department.
All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall
show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not
to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all
light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval with the landscape
construction plans, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials
to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the
property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape
maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carryout the detailed program.
21.
An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
22.
23.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Exhibit "P', or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent
with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following
items:
a.
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
b.
R:\C U P\2OO4\O4-O152 Hillcresr AcademylST AFF REPORT,doc
22
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details
the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth
and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The
approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance
contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
Prior to Building Occupancy
24.
25.
c.
d.
e.
The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning
Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
26.
27.
Landscaping: Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding the building are kept at
a height of no more than three feet (3') or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants,
hedges and shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from
breaking into the building utilizing lower level windows.
a. Applicant should ensure all trees surrounding the building roof top be kept at a
distance so as to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Trees also act
as a natural ladder. Prune tree branches with at least a 6 feet clearance from the
building.
Any burms should not exceed 3' in height.
-
b.
The placement of all landscaping should comply with guidelines from Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED).
Lighting: All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex should be energy-saving and
minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting
Ordinance. Furthermore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting
Requirements.
a. All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above.
The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one (1) foot candle of light at
ground level, evenly dispersed.
c.
28.
Hardware: All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous
hardware shall be commercial or institution grade.
29.
Graffiti: Any graffiti painted or marked upon the building shall be removed or painted
over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Notify the Temecula Police
Department immediately so a report can be taken.
R,\C U P\2OO4\O4-O152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
23
30.
31.
32.
33.
--;
Alarm System: Upon completion of construction, the building shall have a monitored
alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm
company, to notify the police department immediately of any intrusion.
Roof Hatches: All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
Public Telephones: Any public telephones located on the exterior of the building should
be placed in a well-lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature
to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the
interior of the building.
Marked Parking for Disabled Vehicles: All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall
be marked in accordance with section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
34.
Crime Prevention:
a. All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their
booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association
1127-111h Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal
Code 490.5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a
civil demand program.
Business desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the
crime prevention unit of the Temecula Police Department.
Employee training regarding retail theft, credit card prevention, citizen's arrest
procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related
crime prevention training procedures are also available through the crime
prevention unit.
Any business that serves or sell any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with
all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines
associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the
Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees and
owners. This includes special events held at business location where alcohol will
be serviced for a fee and the event is open to the general public.
The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to
participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less than $40.00 for
inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a
personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of
the business-advising customers of the "Inkless Ink program in use". If the
business becomes a victim of check fraud, the police department will be able to
track the suspect with the thumbprint.
b.
c.
d.
e.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
35.
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to
any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site
plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
R;\C U NOO4\04-0152 HiUcrest AcadernylST AFF REPORT,doc
24
General Requirements
36.
37.
A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
~
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
e. Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
44.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
45.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
R:IC U 1'12004\04-0152 Hillcrest AcademylST AFF REPORT,doc
25
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
,
.....,
51.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a.
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department
of Public Works.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
52.
53.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
54.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
RoIC U NOO4I04-O152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFFREPORTdoc
26
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County
area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this
ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the
time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance
03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April
1, 1998)
~
61.
62.
Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
63.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
64.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
65.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
prior to permit issuance.
66.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
67.
68.
Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons
with disabilities.
R:IC U 1'12004104-0152 Hillcrest AcademylST AFF REPORT,doc
27
69.
70.
71.
72.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the
approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
Show all building setbacks.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any
site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
73.
74.
, 75.
76.
77.
Any damage done to the existing Class II bike lane along Santiago Road shall be
repaired to the satisfaction of the Public Works and Community Services Departments.
The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
All landscaping including areas within the ROW, fencing and on site lighting shall be
maintained by the property owner or an established maintenance association.
If additional arterial streetlights are to be installed on Santiago Road as a result of this
project then prior to building permit or installation of streetlights, whichever occurs first,
the developer shall submit a streetlight application form, approved Edison streetlight
plans and pay the appropriate streetlight advanced energy fees.
78.
Prior to issuance of building permit the developer shall provide TCSD verification of
arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris.
FiRE DEPARTMENT
79.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
R:IC U P\2004104-0152 Hillcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
28
80.
81.
82.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM
for a total fire flow of 1900 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A)
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required. (CFC 903.2)
83.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
84.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
85.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec 902)
86.
If access within 150 feet of the surface of all buildings is not practical the developer may
at their option and expense install "Full Area Smoke Detection" in accordance with
Section 609 California Mechanical Code as mitigation for the lack of required access.
87.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
88.
The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent.
(CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
R:IC U P'l2004\O4-0152I1iUcrest AcademylSTAFF REPORT,doc
29
89.
90.
91.
92.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers' shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
93.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family
residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
94.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Àrticle 10)
95.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser door. (CFC 902.4)
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
96.
97.
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
R:IC U 1"12004\04-0152 Hillcrest AcademylST AFF REPORT,doc
30
Special Conditions
98.
99.
100.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for approval.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on tile at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
101.
102.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated April 16, 2004 from the
Riverside County Department of Environmental Health.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated April 29, 2004 from the
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated April 29, 2004 from the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
103.
Applicant's Name
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
R\C U 1'\2004\04-0152 Hillcrest AcademylST AFF REPORT,doc
31
;A COUt<TY OF RIVERSIDE ., COMMUl'fITY HEALTH AGENCY
~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
)
April 16,2004
City of Temecula Planning Depaltment
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Dan Long
RE:
Plot Plan No. PA04-0152
Dear Mr. Long:
1. Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA04-0152 to construct a
13,777 sq. ft. school facility on 4.37 acres and has no objections. Water and sewer services
should be available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD
BE REQUIRED:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts.
b) If there is to be any food preparation, three complete sets of plans will be submitted
including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to
ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For
specific reference, contact Food Facility Plan Examiners at (909) 600-6330.
Sincerely.
Martinez, Supervisin mental Health Specialist
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
~ Œ @ Œ G íTI Œ Ií\ì\
\\N APR 2 0 2004 ~
By-
=
0.01 Eafor.emenl Asen.y . ~o, Box 1260. Riverside. CA 92502-1260 . (909) 955-8982 . FAX 1909) 781-9653 . 4060 Lemon Stree!. 9th Floor. Riverside, CA 92501
..d !Joe and Waler Enstn..rlng . ~o, Box 1206, Riverside, CA 92502-1206 . (909) 955-8960 . FAX (909) 955-8903 . 4060 Lemon Skeel. 2nd ADO!, Riverside, CA 92501
8>
'--
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O BOX 532711
LOS ANGELES, CAUFORNIA 90053-2325
April 29, 2004
REPL no
AnENTION OF:
Office of the Chief
Regulatory Branch
MDMG
Attn: Micheal J. Richter
41635 El}terprise Circle North
Temecula"Ca 92590-5614
R!::GI::IVED
MAY 062004
MDlVlb, INC.
Dear Mr. Richter,
Reference is made to your application/letter Corps file No 200400966-CLM dated April
23, 2004 for a Department of the Army Permitto construct 13,777 square feet for a school
facility on 4.37 acres near Murrieta Creek in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California.
Based on the information furnished in your application/letter, we have deteffiÙned that
yourproposed project does not discharge dredged or fill material into a water of the United
States or an adjacent wetland. Therefore, the project is not subject to our jurisdiction under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and a Section 404 permit is not required from our office.
--;
Please be aware that our deteffiÙnation does not preclude the need to comply with
Section 13260 of the California Water Code (porter/Cologne) and we recommend that you
contact the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to insurecompIiance with the
above regulations. Furthermore, our deteffiÙnation does not obviate the need to obtain other
Federal, state, or local authorizations required by law.
If you have any questions, please contact Crystal Marquez of my staff at (213) 452-3418.
fñ:JL1L
Mark Durham
Chief, South Coast Section
Regulatory Branch
W AKlŒN D, WILLIAMS
General Manager-ChiefEngineer
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909.955,1200
909.788.9965 FAX
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
51180,1
City ofTemecula
Plannin..Q Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, Califomia 92589-9033
Attention: 1)p.. N 1 ()N ~
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
fA 04-Ð(f)2-
lJ1.e District ~oe~ not normally recommend C<?nditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities. The Dlstnct also does not plan check ClI¥ land use cases. or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
oth,er flood hazar~ reports for such ca~e~, qisttict, coml)1el)ts/recommend¡¡tions for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific Interest to the District Including District Master Drainage Plan facilities other regional flood
contro! al)d, ,drainaQ, ..,e fa.c. Uities whiCh,COUld b, e consider!!~ a logical compO,n,eF\f.Or e¡de,nS,ion, of a,', maste.r, PI, an syste. m,.'
!!!1!!.,odlsdtJ:iC! Area Draln¡¡QE! PI!lD,l!!!!s (devel9pment mitlgati9n fees). In addition, Infom:l@tionofageneraln¡¡lureis
provi e .
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
~ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional Interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on
- written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter. or other facilities that could be
- considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted,
Master Drainage Plan, The District woula consider accepting ownership Of such faCIlities on wntten request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards. and District plan check and inspection will
be required for District acceptance. Plan check. inspection and administrative fees will be required.
..L This project is located within the limits of the District's I 'TI'I I"f LA VA~ Area
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adop e ; app lca e ees ou e pal y shier's
check or money order only to !fie Flood Control District prior to issuance 0 building or grading pe. rmits¡
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actua
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES\ permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation. or other final approval should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergem;y Management Agency (FEMA) map~d flood plain. then the City should
require the applicant to provide all studies calculations, plans and other Information required to meet FEMA
requirements, and should further require thai the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project. and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the CalifornIa Department 01 Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written coIT!!spondence from t~ese agencies
indicating the project is exempt from these reqUIrements, A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404
permit. ',<
c:
Very truly yours,
~~
ARTURO DIAZ
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: +/'1/ ß,f #¿71'
51\11