Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout061604 PC Agenda ... In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JUNE 16, 2004 - 6:00 P.M. ........ Next In Order: Resolution No. 2004-031 CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: Commissioner Chiniaeff RollCall: Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary I2!:Í2!: to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. . CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDATION: R:\PLANCOMMlAgendes\2004\O6-16-04.doc 1.1 Approve the Agenda of June 16, 2004 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of April 21, 2004 3 Director's Hearina Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for May 2004 COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. New Items 4 Plannina Application No. PA03-0717 an Administrative Development Plan. submitted bv Matt Greenbera. WestMar. to construct a 550 square foot fenced outdoor smokinalseatina area in association with an existina lounae located at 27725 Jefferson Avenue. Suite 101 and 102. north of Montezuma. Emerv Papp. Senior Planner 5 Plannina Application No. PA04-0215 a Comprehensive Sian Proaram. submitted bv Bruce Heinsel. Motivational Svstems. for the "villaae" commercial portion of the Temecula Creek Villaae Proiect located on the south side of Hiahwav 79S between Jedediah Smith Road and Avenida De Missiones. Emerv Pace. Senior Planner. ' 6 Plannina Application No. PA04-0297 a Citv initiated Development Code Amendment to establish requirements for private heliports and to make other minor chances. Matt Harris. Associate Planner. 7 Plannina Application No. PA02-0478 an Appeal. submitted bv Brad Adams. Sunstone Svstems International. Inc.. of the Plannina Director's decision to approve a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the construction. establishment and operation of a private heliport on an existinq industrial buildinq located at 42580 Rio Nedo. Matt Harris. Associate Planner R :\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2004\O6-16-04.doc 8 Plannina Application No. PA03-Q535 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan. submitted bv Lon Bike. Architectural Team 3. to construct an 18.808 square foot. three-storv office/retail buildina within the Old Town Specific Plan Area. located on the south side of Fifth Street. approximately 120 west of Front Street. Don Hazen. Principal Planner. 9 Plannina Application No. PA03-0518 a Citv initiated proposal to make amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan. includinq updatina information on the urban infrastructure plans. delete duplicate land uses from the permitted use matrix. add supplemental desian standards. modifv the Land Use Map. update the Local Review Board's responsibilities. and delete the oriainal implementation proaram. David Hoaan. Principal Planner COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: July 7, 2004 Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2004\O6-16-04.doc . ITEM #2 . . . . . MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21,2004 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday, April 21, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Telesio thanked Eve Craig for the prelude music. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Chiniaeff led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Chairman Telesio. Absent: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of April 21, 2004. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of March 3, 2004. 3 Director's Hearinq Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for March 2004. R:\MinutesPC\O42104 MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the Consent Calendar and requested to move Item No.7 after No.5. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. . COMMISSION BUSINESS 4 Reauest to approve an interim policy addressina development proposals in the Chaparral Special Study Area while the General Plan is beina updated. The interim policv further refines how the Chaparral criteria will be implemented and is expected to be consistent with the General Plan after it is updated RECOMMENDATION 4.1 Recommend City Council Approval of the Chaparral Interim Policy Principal Planner Hogan presented a staff report (of record), noting the following: That in developing the proposed policy, staff had discussions with an ad hoc City Council Subcommittee as well as the General Plan Community Advisory Committee (CAC); . That both groups were of the opinion that development proposals that protect sensitive open space areas and provide local trail connections are desirable and have the highest potential for community wide benefits; . That the proposed interim policy is as follows: . 0 Limit the gross density in the Chaparral area to one dwelling unit per acre, except for the tier of lots adjacent to Ynez Road where a density of two dwelling units per acre would be more appropriate; 0 That a one unit per acre density allow half-acre sized lots to help preserve sensitive open space and habitat areas; 0 That all future developments provide trail dedications for the Citywide trail network when possible; That the City Council reviewed the policy direction received from the Subcommittee and the Commission Advisory Commission (CAC) and refer the matter to the Planning Commission for a formal recommendation. For the Commission, Mr. Hogan relayed that the land uses that are currently in the General Plan uses are currently in the General Plan interim policy; and that what is being proposed is to allow ì2 acre lots in what is currently a one-acre zoning district; that there are two different situations being proposed, one would be for the ì2 acre lots and the other project area is for the one-acre density with the ability to go down to an ì2 lots if the remaining is set is some form of open space. . R:\MinutesPC\O42104 2 . . . Mr. Hogan also relayed that for City-owned trails, proper maintenance would include: regular inspections, repairs and resurfacing as needed, weed control, safety signage, and stripping (if hard surfaced); that when the City trail facilities are constructed in easement areas, City liability for the trail is still covered through the General Plan Liability Policy; however, non-trail related liability will still remain the responsibility of the underlying property owners. Mr. Hogan further clarified that the proposed project is designed for large parcels; that it is a voluntary policy; that it would not apply to a person who would desire to build a home on their own lot; and that it would only apply if one were to have subdivisions of land. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Larry Markham, 41045 Enterprise Circle relayed that he is in favor of the project and noted that the proposed project would cut the density in half for the vast majority of the area with the exception of the parcels that are immediately adjacent to Ynez; and that it would allow flexibility on how to site the parcels with regard to clustering. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. It was the consensus of the Commission to combine Item No.5 and 7. 5 Public Necessitv and Convenience Findinqs 29676 Rancho California Road. Taraet Retail Buildinq RECOMMENDATION 5.1 Approve Findings of Public Convenience Per the request of Commissioner Guerriero, Item No.7 will be reviewed after Item No.5 7 Planninq Application No. PA03-0726 a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the sales of beer and wine (Tvpe 20 License) in an existina Taraet Buildina. located at 29676 Rancho California Road Associate Planner Long presented a staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: . That the proposed project is for a minor CUP that includes the Public Necessity and Findings for Target to sell beer and wine on site; . That the separation of criteria in the Development Code requires 500 feet separation from any schools, parks, hospitals, or religious institution; . That staff was able to make the findings and recommends the approval for a minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as well as the findings for convenience; R:\MinutesPC\0421 04 3 . That at this time, Target does not sell any alcohol or liquor; and that this is its first proposal. . At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Ms. Beth Aboulafia, 260 Calitornia Street, representing Target, relayed the following: . That Target started selling wine at its stores in California two years ago; . That currently there are 40 stores in Northern California that are licenses and have been selling wine; . That due to its success, Target started expanding the program to its stores in Southern California; . That Target has not had any problems or violations with selling to minors at any of the stores that have already been licensed in California; . That the application is for a Type 20 off site beer and wine license; . That there will be no consumption on the premises; . That although its a beer and wine license, Target will only be selling wine; . That all Target Stores have only been selling wine; . That the sales of wine will only represent 3% of sales; but that it would be a complement to the food and beverage products that Target currently has in its market section and will be a convenience to Target's customers; . . That Target employees will be provided a training program relating to alcohol and beverage sales that is specific to the laws and regulations to California; . That there have been no objections from the few neighboring residents; . That there have been no objections from the Police Department; . That wine bottles will be located in the market section of Target; At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Guerriero is of the opinion that there is no need or convenience to approve a Type 20 beer and wine license. For Commissioner Olhasso, Ms- Ubnoske relayed that currently there are no plans for redevelopment in the Target Center. Commissioner Mathewson expressed concern with approving another license for beer and wine sales in the area. . R:\MinutesPC\O421 04 4 . . . For Commissioner Mathewson, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that when the state turned the jurisdiction over to the Cities, they did not give any criteria; and that the City Attorney developed the criteria for staff that is fairly consistent with other jurisdictions across the state. Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern with denying the proposed item stating that the census tract boundary is arbitrary and that if the City is going to allow establishments to sell alcohol in commercial zones (which is established in the zoning ordinance), that the City should be consistent and; therefore, either allow more establishments to sell alcohol, or that if the Commission is of the opinion that there is over-concentration of Type 20 licenses, then the zoning ordinance should be changed; and that it would be inequitable to allow some stores to sell and others to not sell. Chairman Telesio is of the opinion that staff should be reviewing the zoning ordinance; that he finds it difficult to approve these findings of convenience for large box type stores and deny sales to smaller outlets. For the Commission, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that changing the zoning ordinance to not permit alcohol sales in commercial zones would be a huge detriment to economic development. Assistant City Attorney Curly relayed that the Commission has the ability on each discretionary land use decision to look at the specific criteria. .MQI!Q.!':!: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the findings of Public Convenience. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion voice vote reflected denial with the exception of Commissioner Chiniaeff who voted ~. MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to denv PC Resolution No. 2002-019 due to the fact that the nature of the proposed use is detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the community because the census tract is over-saturated with liquor licenses at this time. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected denial of Minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) with the exception of Commissioner Chiniaeff wiiõVOted No. Commissioner Chiniaeff requested that staff have the City Council evaluate their commercial uses as related to alcohol permits. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION PA NO. 03-0726, A REQUEST FOR MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TYPE 20 (OFF-SALE BEER AND WINE) ALCOHOL LICENSE FOR TARGET LOCATED AT 29676 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-320-053. R:\MinutesPC\042104 5 Continued from April 7, 2004 . 6 Plannina Application No. PA02-0717 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct and operate a wireless telecommunications facilitv to include a 56-foot hiah artificial palm tree with three (3\ antennas housed within the bulb portion of the tree and four outdoor eQuipment cabinets within a 310 square foot block screen wall enclosure. located at 315754 Enfield Lane Associate Planner Fisk presented a staff report relaying that at the request of the Planning Commission, the applicant prepared additional propagation maps via overhead displaying the following: Coverage without the proposed antenna facility; . Coverage with an antenna at 39 feet at the proposed site; Coverage with an antenna at 50 feet at the proposed site; Coverage with an antenna at 50 feet if the facility were located at Riverton Park; Coverage with an antenna at 50 feet if the facility were located at San Diego Aqueduct vents; Coverage with antenna at 50 feet if the facility were located on residential property east of Butterfield Stage Road; . . That the applicant prepared new photo simulations which include two additional live palm trees planted near the proposed monopalm; and that this would be a total of four (4) new live palm trees. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr- Gil Gonzales, 150 Paularino Avenue, representing Cingular Wireless, noted the following: . That with an antenna at 39 feet at the proposed site would include a 45 foot monopalm and that this would include holes in coverage and would not allow connection to the site to the north/west and does not extend as much coverage to the west as desired. At this time, Mr. Gil distributed additional pictures of alternative sites that were considered by Cingular Wireless, which also included a list of the properties that were investigated. Mr. Mashesh Kolush, 150 Paularino Avenue, Radio Frequency Engineer for Cingular Wireless, further clarified line of site technology and RF emissions. For the record, Chairman Telesio noted that the Commission understands the concerns of the resident's; but that Federal Law precludes the Commission from making decisions in regard to radiation emissions. The following individuals spoke against the proposed project for the following reasons: Mr. Leonard Cole 40360 Windsor Road . R:\MinutesPCl0421 04 6 . . . Mr- Kenneth Peterson 40396 Windsor Road Ms. Kathleen Gerber 40433 Windsor Road Mr. Brian Gerber 40433 Windsor Road Ms. Valesta Ayer 40325 Windsor Road Ms. Roma Stromberg 40384 Windsor Road . That the proposed project is a commercial venture at the expense of the neighborhood; . That the proposed property has been excavated; that the property is not stable; and that there have been mud slides with heavy rains; . That the released emissions from the cell tower could be noisy and dangerous; . That it does not appear to be a strategically planned effort; . That property values could potentially diminish due to the proposed project; . That the proposed project will be unsightly to look at every day; . That there are a significant amounts of cell towers and that there is no real need for anymore; '. That there has not been a visual impact study, view shed analysis, or line of site analysis performed; . That the proposed project is inconsistent with the City's "Procedures for Cell Tower Impact Analysis". Mr. Gonzales relayed the following in response to residents' concerns: . That Cingular Wireless investigated the entire area and it was determined that the proposed area is in the center of the search ring; that the height has also been determined with RF propagation maps and what Cingular Wireless is trying to cover; and that Cingular Wireless is trying to provide coverage for the 300 tract homes to the south; . That a generator would only be used if the power were to completely fail; . That the noise that would be heard would be similar to a computer fan; That Cingular Wireless hired a real estate consultant firm to evaluate the property values of homes that are within ¥2 mile radius of Cingular Wireless Cell Sites; and that it was determined that property values did not decrease; . That the proposed project would emit the same amount of EMF radiation as a baby monitor: and that one would be exposed to more EMF radiation by standing too close to the television; R:\MinutesPC\0421 04 7 . That Cingular Wireless will be complying with the California Public Utilities Commission; . . That there will be SCE permanent service to the site; and that a generator would only be used if all the power were to go down by some type of disaster or unknown reason; and that there would not be a generator running fulltime; . That the proposed monopalm will have a security lock and a sensor that will alert Cingular Wireless 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Fisk noted that this Item No. was noticed through the newspaper and that individual agencies were sent notice of intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Commissioner Mathewson relayed that it would be his opinion that the issues of concern that were raised by residents in regard to aesthetics, noise, and property values is not significant, but that in regard to screening efforts, would request that the proposed project be lowered to 39 feet; and that this would allow the proposed monopalm to blend in better with the surrounding palms. . Commissioner Guerriero concurred with Commissioner Mathewson's comments including the height from SO feet to 39 feet. Commissioner Olhasso echoed the previous comments. Commissioner Chiniaeff agreed that the height could be lowered to 39 feet and suggested that staff work with the landscape architect to add a variety of palms. . Chairman Telesio agreed with all of the above comments. Mr. Fisk noted that the distribution date for the Negative Declaration was December 11, 2003. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff's recommendation with the condition that the palm be lowered from 50 feet to 39 feet; that there be a variety of palm trees planted, and that the number of trees that are being added around the wall be increased from two to four and be of the same type or variety that the pole is proposed to be. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO PAO2-o717, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WITH THREE (3) ANTENNAS HOUSED WITHIN THE BULB PORTION OF A PROPOSED FIFTY-SIX FOOT HIGH ARTIFICIAL PALM TREE AND FOUR . R:\MinutesPC\O42104 8 . . . OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS WITHIN A 310 SQUARE FOOT BLOCK WALL ENCLOSURE AT 31575 ENFIELD LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ENFIELD LAND, APPROXIMATELY 3,200 FEET EAST OF RIVERTON LANE (APN 957-170-012). At this time, the Commission took a ten minute break. New Items This item was addressed on pages 3, 4, and 5. 7 Plannina Application No. PA03-0726 a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the sales of beer and wine (Tvpe 20 License) in an existina Taraet Buildina. located at 29676 Rancho California Road 8 Plannina Application No. PAD3-0M3. a Development Plan to construct a 29.516 square foot office buildina on 5.69 acres. located on the south side of County Center Drive. approximatelv 1.500 feet east of Ynez Road Plannina Application No. PAD3-D725 a Development Plan and Product Review for the desian of 99 sinale-familv residences. includina three floor plans and three architectural stvles. located on the south side of Murrieta Hot Sprinas and west of the future extension of Butterfield Staae Road within the Roripauah Ranch Specific Plan. Plannina Area 2 Associate Planner Fisk presented a staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: . That the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan designation of business park and zoning designation of the Light Industrial; . That the building meets the minimum setback requirements of the Development Code and the proposed lot coverage of 28.5 percent (based on the overall lot acreage of 5.69 acres) is well below the maximum allowed lot coverage of 40 percent; . That staff determined that 98 parking spaces are required to serve the proposed building while 99 spaces will be provided; . That access to the site will be provided from two existing drive aisles off county center drive; . That a new drive aisle behind the proposed building will provide a connection between the two existing drive aisles for a loop drive around the proposed building; . That the Public Works Department determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the General Plan EIR; . That the Fire Department determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site; R:\MinutesPC\O42104 9 That the proposed office building design is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines, and is compatible with the industrial and office buildings in the surrounding area; . . That the landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and Design Guidelines; . That an initial study was prepared and indicated that the project could have potentially significant environmental impacts related to archeological and palentological resources unless mitigation measures are included as Conditions of Approval; . That staff is recommending adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Fisk relayed that if anything is found during the excavation of the project the City would be notified. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Ed Mc Ardle, architect representing The Garrett Group, relayed that the concrete will be tilted-up and the paint will be a topey-tan color. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0443, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 29,526 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON 5.69 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET EAST OF YNEZ ROAD (APN 910-110-045). 9 Plannina Application No. PA03-0634 a Development Plan and Product Review for the desian of 113 sinale-familv residences. includina four floor plans and three architectural stvles. located on the south side of Murrieta Hot Sprinas and west of the future extension of Butterfield Staae Road within the Roripauah Ranch Specific Plan. Plannina Area 4B Associate Planner Long presented a staff report (of record), relaying the following: . That the applicant has provided various features encouraged in the Design' Guidelines such as a variation in garage locations and Porte Cocheres; . That Plan One (1) includes a trellis on the East Coast Traditional as well as a recessed garage; . That Plan Two (2) includes a mid-deep recessed garage and a Porte Cocheres; . R:\MinutesPC\0421 04 10 . . . . That Plan Three (3) does not include a deep recessed garage; however, that between the three plans, staff is of the opinion that there is sufficient variety; . That in regard to single-story product, staff listened to the previous minutes of the City Council which adopted the Design Guidelines and Specific Plan (SP), and it was determined that there is no specific language requiring single story products; however, it did state that it be determined by staff and/or the market; . That the proposed project is not proposing a single-story product; however, staff is of the opinion that there are various single-story elements within Plan One (1) and Plan Two (2), that meet the intent of the Design Guidelines; . That the Design Guidelines require corner lots to create "two front elevations"; that staff is of the opinion that the side elevations do not appear as a second front elevation on any of the corner lots; . That staff is of the opinion that the Monterey and Spanish Revival offer too many similarities; that staff recommended that the applicant use alternative materials to offer more variation; however, the applicant has not proposed any additional materials; . That Plan one (1) and Plan two (2) do not include a significant amounts of variation; . That staff is of the opinion that none of the projects include a strong focal point; and that all the garage doors proposed do not include a significant amount of variety. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Stephen Albert, 3635 Hayden Avenue, representing the applicant, noted the following: . Clarified how the Spanish Revival and the Monterey are different and do provide enough variation between the two; . That the in regard to roofing, the applicant is of the opinion that there is enough variation and that the applicant is satisfied with the proposed project; . That the material of the front doors will be of wood material; . That although the garage doors to not appear to be astoundingly different, there is some variation; and that the garage doors are segmented rollup windows. Commissioner Olhasso suggested that staff and the applicant explore options to enhance the garage doors, preferably a barn type style door. Commissioner Mathewson expressed concern in regard to massing in Plan Two (2). Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed that the Spanish Revival and the Monterey had too many similarities and also relayed that the elevations of the residences that front the street need to be addressed, especially Plan three (3). R:\MinutesPC\042104 11 At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. . Mr. Todd Brazen of Cast Group Architects, made the following comments: . That the Spanish Revival gives a rustic appearance; . That the Monterey style will have soft curves on the eaves, stucco detailing; that there will be curves on the second-story overhand on Plan Two (2); and that it will also have a different shutter and window design; . That the roof tile on the Monterey could be altered; and that there is a "S" tile on the Spanish Revival; . That in regard to massing, from the street one will be able to see a variety of shades and shadows. Ms. Paula Lombardi, vice-president of development with Davidson Communities, relayed the following: . That she was disappointed that the color boards were not available to the Commission for review; . That the applicant is of the opinion that the requirements have been met in regard to the garage doors, elevations and differentials in the residences. . Commissioner Olhasso offered the following comments: . That mixing up the proposed product on Brush Creek would help to diminish the canyon- like affect; . That changing the roof coloring on the Spanish Revival and/or the Monterey would help to diminish similarity on the two homes. Commissioner Guerriero offered the following Comments: . That he is in concurrence with staff in regard to Conditions of Approval No. 12, 15, 17, 19,20. Commissioner Mathewson offered the following comments: Reducing the massing on Plan Two (2) by eliminating the second-story over the front portion of the residence; . That the applicant address window spacing and windows with single shutters as well as the width of the entry doors; . That the Monterey Plan Three (3) first-story windows need more architectural treatments. . Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested the following: R:\MinutesPC\0421 04 12 . . . . That Plan One (1) and Plan Two (2) corner lots needs enhancement; . That the applicant provide additional shingle siding on the sides of the East Coast Traditional elevation; . That variation in roof material and color on the Spanish and Monterey elevations be changed; . That variation in garage door design be provided. Ms. Lombardi relayed that she would be implementing the following: Reduce the number of Plan Three (3) on Brush Creek; . Change the roof materials and color on the Spanish Revival and Monterey elevations and "S" tiles to flat tiles; . That the applicant will be providing a variation in garage door design; . That the applicant will consider implementing Conditions Nos. 12,15, 17, 19, and 20; that these conditions require arched focal points on the Spanish and Monterey elevations, varied foot planes for each floor plan, decorative garage doors, and additional materials on the Spanish or Monterey elevations to better distinguish between the styles and wrap siding around to the sides; . That reducing the massing on Plan Two (2) by eliminating the second-story at this time, would be a major rework of the whole second-story; . That the applicant will explore the option of minimizing the number of Plan Two (2) and Three (3) adjacent to one another; . That the applicant will explore the option of revising corner lots to have them appear as a second front elevation, such as materials, arched focal points, courtyards, and patios. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. The Commission requested that Mr. Long provide the landscape plans, streetscape plans and colors board for the next meeting. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to continue this item to Mav 19. 2004 for redesign. ëõiTiiñiSsioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:\MinutesPC\0421 04 13 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO PA03-0725 A PRODUCT REVIEW FOR 99 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 2 OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED SOUTH OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS, KNOW AS TRACT MAP 29661-2. . 10 Plannina Application No. PA03-0634 a Development Plan and Product Review for the desian of 113 sinale-familv residences. includina four floor plans and three architectural stvles. located on the south side of Murrieta Hot Sprinas and west of the future extension of Butterfield Staae Road within the Roripauah Ranch Specific Plan. Plannina Area 4B Associate Planner Long presented a staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: . That the applicant is proposing a product review for 113 detached single-family residences with the Roripaugh Specific Plan (SP); . That staff worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed; and that the project does not meet the intent of the design guidelines; . That the applicant has not provided consistent plans showing that the products meet all of the development standards, primarily setbacks; . . That staff would request that the Commission provide direction in regard to the rear yard setbacks along Planning Area seven (7); that Planning Area seven (7) is the open space lot on the southern portion of the panhandle; and that the SP require 25 foot setback for lots abutting Planning Area seven (7); . That the following is a list of staff's concerns that have not been addressed: 0 Four sided architecture; 0 Detail and/or variation between each style; 0 Two front elevations on corner lots; 0 Minimum setbacks standards (inconsistent dimensions); 0 Variation in the placement of garages has not bee provided; 0 Stucco finish is not consistent with the Design Guidelines; 0 Fencing at exposed corners is not consistent with the development and silhouettes/roof do not provide significant variation; standards, . That staff has concluded that the proposed project cannot be found consistent with the Design Guidelines and or development standards with the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP) and recommends continuance for redesign. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. . R:\MinutesPC\0421 04 14 . . . Mr. M. J. Knitter, 20151 Birch Street, architect for Knitter and Associates, commenting on the following: . That the applicant has made an effort to revise and/or enhance the proposed project; . That the applicant chose three styles on the exterior that the applicant found to be the most popular and most sought after in Temecula; . That the applicant has provided enhanced sides and rears on 67 residences; . That the applicant is willing to make changes, comments, or revisions that staff may have; . That the applicant is of the opinion that the intent of the Design Guidelines have been met; . That the applicant has a wide section of roof tiles; and that the applicant could add colors if it is the will of the Commission. Mr. Stephen M. Albert, 3635 Hayden Avenue, relayed the following: . That the Plan One (1), Praire has an arch focal point which is made of brick and veneer on a brown coat of stucco. Mr. Kevin Everett, 3553 Hayberry Drive representing ASHBY, USA, noted that there are only a selective number of lots that provide a setback of 25 feet. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Olhasso expressed concern with Plan Two (2), stating that it appears to be outdated. Commissioner Guerriero suggested that the applicant enhance the sides and rears of all plans. Commissioner Mathewson suggested providing additional windows on side elevations. MQI!QM: Commissioner Olhasso moved to continue this item to Mav 19. 2004 for redesign. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS Commissioner Guerriero thanked Ms. Ubnoske for the phone cards but that they are a few wrong numbers on them. Commissioner Olhasso requested a Planning Commission application for the next term. Chairman Telesio suggested that the Commissioners use the request to speak buttons- R:\MinutesPC\042104 15 PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report at this time. ADJOURNMENT At 10:30 p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next reQular meetinQ to be held on Wednesdav. Mav 5. 2004 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. John Telesio Chairman R:\MinutesPC\042104 16 Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning . . . '. . ITEM #3 . . . TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning June 16, 2004 Director's Hearing Case Update Planning Director's Agenda items for May 2004 May 20, 2004 May 27,2004 Attachment: PA04-0042 PA03-0709 A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide a 1.97 acre parcel into two industrial lots with a minimum lot size of .98 acres. Located on Bostic Ct, approximately 800 feet south of Winchester Road. A Minor Conditional Use Permit to establish a 4,896 square foot church, including a 2.082 square foot sanctuary, located at 41735 Winchester Road (APN: 909-282- 005). A Development Plan to construct, establish and operate a single-story office and restaurant facility with a drive-through window totaíing 6,500 square feet on 1.03 acres. 1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 2 P: IPlANNIN GID IRHEAR IMEM 0\2004 \0 5. 2004. doc Appli(;"aht Dennis Jandalnc Pat Conklin Randy Bohl Approved Continued . . . P: \P LANNINGID IRHEAR IMEM 0\2 004 \0 5- 2004. doc ~~c:J ::~L:"_::î-~~L"'~~~ " ATTACHMENT NO.1 ACTION AGENDAS - "..--"~:"'~-c.-, é'";;;;'::l'III:i!'~"., '"-';;";;;;""O"-"",,.¡,;:"~ê::";:. ",," ,".. "..< . . . ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING May 6, 2004 1 :30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1 Project Information: Project Number: Project Type: Project Name: Applicant: Project Description: Location: APN: Project Planner: ACTION: PA04-0075 Tentative Parcel Map TPM 32158 Dennis Janda Inc. A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide a 1.97 acre parcel into two industrial lots with a minimum size of .98 acres. Located on Bostic Ct, approximately 800 feet south of Winchester Road. 909-360-037 Matt Harris APPROVED P,IPLANNlNGlDIRHEARlAgendasl2004\05-06-{)4 Actinn Agenda.doc 1 AGENDA . TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING May 20, 2004 1 :30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1 Project Information: Location: APN: Project Planner: ACTION: PA04-0042 Minor Conditional Use Permit The Springs Community Church Pat Conklin Minor CUP for the relocation of the Springs Community church to an existing community building. Located at 41735 Winchester Road Suite C 909-282-005 Dan Long APPROVED . Project Number: Project Type: Project Name: Applicant: Project Description: . P,\PLANNING\DIRHEAR\Agendas\2004\05-2(}.()4 Action Agenda,doc 1 . . . AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING May 27,20041 :30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1 Project Information: Project Number: Project Type Project Name: Applicant: Project Description: Location: APN: Project Planner: ACTION: PA03-0709 Development Plan Vail Ranch Town Square, Bldg B, Parcel 2 Square One Development A Development Plan to construct a 6,500 sqft single-story office/ restaurant building on a 1.03 acre site within the Vail Ranch Town Square. Located at the southwest corner of State Hwy 79 & Mahlon Vail Road. 960-020-045 Dan Long CONTINUED TO JUNE 10, 2004 P:\PLANNINGIDIRIIEARlAgendas\2004\05-27-04 Action Agenda.doc 1 I . ITEM #4 . . . . . STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: June 16, 2004 Prepared by: Emery J. Papp, AICP Title: Senior Planner File Number Application Type: Development Plan PA03-0717 Project Description: 'An Administrative Development Plan to construct a 550 square foot fenced outdoor smoking/seating area in association with an existing lounge located at 27725 Jefferson Avenue, Suites 101 and 102, north of Via Montezuma. Recommendation: (Check One) IZI Approve with Conditions D Deny D Continue for Redesign D Continue to D Recommend Approval with Conditions D Recommend Denial CEQA: (Check One) !8J Categorically Exempt (Class) Class 1 D Negative Declaration D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR PROJECT DATA SUMMARY: Applicant: Matt Greenberg, WestMar Completion Date: April 24, 2004 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: July 24,2004 General Plan Designation: Service Commercial Zoning Designation: Service Commercial R,\D 1\2003\03-0717 Club BeaconlPC STAFF REPORT.dot Site/Surrounding Land Use: . Site: Commercial Center North: South: East: West: Commercial Center Service Commercial Office Buildings Business Park Lot Area: 1.12 acres Total Floor Area/Ratio N/A Landscape Area/Coverage 24% Parking Required/Provided 28n5 BACKGROUND SUMMARY ~1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed; however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff. ANALYSIS The proprietor of the Beacon Lounge has applied for an Administrative Development Plan (ADP) to construct a 550 square-foot outdoor seating/smoking area in conjunction with the existing lounge. The area is proposed to be fenced with an eight-foot high wall around an existing landscaped area containing three mature eucalyptus trees, shrubs, and ground cover. The applicant proposes to remove all of the existing landscaping on the south side of the building to clear and prepare the floor area to accommodate tables and chairs. The proposed fence will be made of a four-foot high horizontal lapped wood siding section painted to match the existing building and an additional four-foot high clear plexiglass section to provide visibility. The primary access to the fenced outdoor area will be through a new door to be added to the south side of the building. In response to Fire Department comments raised at DRC, the applicant has agreed to install an emergency exit with panic hardware in the new fence. The ADP submittal package was routed for review by other departments- There were no significant issues presented that could not be resolved through conditions of ápproval. . The applicant has expressed concern with Planning Department conditions of approval regarding landscaping. At DRC, the applicant was informed that more landscaping would be required as replacement for the landscaping to be removed. The applicant was advised to plant vines or shrubs along the outside base of the fence, to incorporate live plantings in clay pots near the entrance to the lounge, and to plant a cluster of small trees in the southwest corner of the outdoor area. The applicant's revised plans indicated one sago palm in the corner and a total of three clay pots. The applicant made it clear to staff that this was as much as he was willing to provide and, therefore, staff made an administrative decision to have this item come before the Planning Commission for review and approval. . R:\D P\2003\O3-O7I7 Club BeaconIPC STAFF REPORT,dot . . . Staff recommends that the applicant be conditioned to move the fence inward approximately 18 inches from the drive aisle to accommodate landscape materials that match the commercial building landscaping on the south side of the drive aisle (Condition of Approval number 10). Staff recommends that the proposed sago palm tree be exchanged for another tree species that is present on site. (Condition of Approval number 11). There are currently no other sago palms within the center. Staff also recommends that the doors on the existing trash enclosure behind the west side of the proposed fencing be replaced with doors that match the trash enclosure on the other (south) side of the drive aisle (Condition of Approval number 12). ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ~1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 1, Section 15301 (e) (1)) CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDA TION Staff has determined that the proposed development plan, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, for the Beacon Lounge complies with the provisions of the Development Code. As a result, staff recommends approval of the proposed development plan as conditioned. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the lard use designation and policies reflected for Service Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Service Commercial (SC) Zone in the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for a commercial retail use. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The fencing proposed for the outdoor seating/smoking area is consistent with the existing center's architecture, the Design Guidelines, and the Commercial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, can be found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. R:\D 1'\2003\03-0717 Club BeaconIPC STAFF REPORT.dot A IT ACHMENTS 1. 2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 5 PC Resolution No. 2004-- - Blue Page 6 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval . 3. Notice of Exemption - Blue Page 14 . . R:\D P\2003\O3-D717 Club BeaconIPC STAFF REPORT.dot . ATTACHMENT NO.1 . PLAN REDUCTIONS . R:ID P\2oo3\03-0717 Club BeacunIPC STAFF REPORT-dot ~::i,:;::,;;:::fá~"'"',""""".. : ,:"",-=, "' ----"a..-__,,:..;.., -:;.",=,-"~~~~";;">.:.:.",,,,~,,>_:"--'-~"',,,,-,,.,..~.--:'~";:;:~~:~~.:.:1 . ,:'PA03-0717 BEACON LOUNGE SITE PLAN Ro\D 1'\2003\03-0717 Club BeaconIPC STAFF REPORT.dot . . . . <~ . '- - L'::;~jj¡f~~¥4tn~, ~~~~-~ '. , . "',oo, .. , - ..+.'..n . Ro\D 1'\2003\03-0717 Club BeacouIPC STAFF REPORT,dot . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 PC RESOLUTION No. 2004-- R:\D P\2003\03-Q717 Club BeaconIPC STAFF REPORT,dot ~:'",';;L'~:¿::5;:m_",;,:""'>=-~'-'-'" ~~. l ~"'-"""""",...", ~,.~"""'-'.d ,:¡".¡;" .. ~---im¡,~~~;::~clá:;'C;'"" . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-O717, AN ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 550 SQUARE FOOT FENCED OUTDOOR SMOKING/SEATING AREA IN ASSOCIATION WITH AN EXISTING LOUNGE LOCATED AT 27725 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SUITES 101 AND 102, NORTH OF VIA, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 921-400-031. WHEREAS, Westmar Property Management, filed Planning Application No. PA03-0717, an Administrative Development Plan 'Application", in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 16, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 1. by reference. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for SeNice Commercia/ (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for the SeNÏce Commercial (SC) Zone in the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for a commercial retail use, B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. R:\D P\2003\O3-0717 Club BeaconIPC STAFF REPORT.dol The fencing proposed for the outdoor seating/smoking area is consistent with the existing center's architecture, the Design Guidelines, and the Commercial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, can be found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. . Section 3. Environmental Compliance. This project is exempt from review under CEQA, pursuant to Section 15301(Class 1 Categorical Exemption - Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Administrative Development Plan Application, as set forth on attached Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 16th day of June 2004. John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary . [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted b~ the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16 day of June 2004, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary . R:\D 1'\2003\03-0717 Club BeaconIPC STAFF REPORT.dot . EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL . . R:\D P\2003\O3-O717 Club BeaconIPC STAFF REPORT.dot .-;r ;,:."",;';,'Æ'h~:'i-)¡r"""-~- '.~"""",,~.'---.-.--;..:.~!I;;f=-';:;:5.-C: ..,~.,¡¡:/~""",,;g>!i"'c',.o"';-;J::"c """.. . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA03-0717 Project Description: An Administrative Development Plan to construct a 550 square foot fenced outdoor smokinglseating area In association with an existing lounge located at 27725 Jefferson Avenue, Suites 101 and 102, north of Via Montezuma. Approval Date: June 16, 2004 June 16, 2006 Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly. from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees. consultants. contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. R:\D P\2003\03-0717 Club BeaconIPC STAFF REPORT.dot 10 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. . The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty day prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. The construction on the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D" (Site Plan), contained on file with the Planning Department. Landscaping around fencing shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Conceptual Landscape Plan), on file with the Planning Department. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. . 8. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. 9. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. 10. The applicant shall move the fence inward, away from the curb, approximately 18 inches from the drive aisle to accommodate landscape materials that match the commercial building landscaping on the south side of the drive aisle. The applicant shall exchange the proposed sago palm tree for another tree species that is currently present on the site. 11. . R:\D P\2003\O3-o717 Club BeacanIPC STAFF REPORT,dot 11 . . . 12. The applicant shall replace the doors on the existing trash enclosure behind the west side of the proposed fencing with doors that fully screen and match the trash enclosure on the other (south) side of the drive aisle. All rules, regulations and requirements enforceable by Alcohol Beverage Control shall be adhered to at all times. 13. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 14. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. BUILDING AND SAFETY - Mark Harold, Deputy Building Official, (909) 694-6478 15. Please show clearly on the plans a detail to show conformance with the requirements for floor level at doors as per California Building Code 1003.3.1.6. Please show at new door to Patio. PUBLIC WORKS - Annie Bostre-Le, Special Projects Engineer, (909) 694-6411 Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 16. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT - Cathy McCarthy, Development Services Administrator, (909) 694-6480 17. 18. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION - Lynne Fanene, Crime Prevention and Plans Officer, (909) 506-2626 19. The patio fencing enclosure will be constructed so as not to allow patrons to pass alcohol to personnel outside the enclosed patio area. Furthermore, the entry/exit point to the patio will be from the main entry into the business. Any other exit areas will be for "emergency exit" only and entry from the outside into the patio area should be restricted. If recurring problems should occur because of alcohol being passed to juveniles or other personnel from the general public through the fencing, the Temecula Police Department, at its discretion, reserve the right to approach the City's Planning Commission and request the fencing requirements be amended. 20. As a type 48 Licensee (On-Sale General Public Premises), the sale of beer, wine and spirits for consumption on the premises is authorized. Minors are not allowed to enter R:\D P\2003\O3-O711 Club BeacanlPe STAFF REPORT.dot 12 21. Crime Prevention: a. All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association 1127-11th Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal Code 490-5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a civil demand program. Business desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the crime prevention unit of the Temecula Police Department. Employee training regarding retail theft, credit card prevention, citizen's arrest procedures, personal safety or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the crime prevention unit. Any business that serves or sell any alcoholic beverages will comply with all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes special events held at business location where alcohol will be serviced for a fee and the event is open to the general public. The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less than $40.00 for inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of the business-advising customers of the "Inkless Ink program in use". If the business becomes a victim of check fraud, the police department will be able to track the suspect with the thumbprint. b. c. d. e. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Date Applicant's Signature Applicant's Printed Name R:\D Pl2003\O3-O717 Club BeaconIPC STAFF REPORT,dot t3 . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 . NOTICE OF EXEMPTION . R:\D P\2003\O3-0717 Club BeacouIPC STAFF REPORT.dot 14 ~,t:~&:;~E':%"!m~".&.,,~.n"¥ ' ,~,,-,,7----"""-,.._, City of Temecula Planning Department . Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 FROM: Planning Department City of Temecula P. O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Project Title: Beacon Lounge Outdoor Seating/Smoking Area (PA03-0717) Description of Project: An Administrative Development Plan to construct a 550 square foot fenced outdoor smoking/seating area in association with an existing lounge. Project Location: 27725 Jefferson Avenue, Suites 101 and 102, north of Via Montezuma, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, California. Project ApplicantlProponent: Matt Greenberg, Westmar Property Management The Community Development Director approved the above described activity on June 16, 2004, and found that the activity is not a project and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. . Exempt Status: (check one) Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); Sec. 15268); Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); Sec. 15269(a»; Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); Sec. 15269(b)(c)); Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) Categorical Exemption: Class 1 (Section Number 15301 (e) (1)) Other: ./ Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: Construction of an outdoor seating/smoking area in conjunction with an existing lounge will not impact the general health and safety of the public, and does not constitute an expansion of use. The proposed application is for the convenience of patrons of the Beacon Lounge and provides a separation of this outdoor use from the general public. As a result, this project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuantto the provisions of Section 15301 (e) (1) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Contact PersonfTitle: Emery J. Papp, AICP, Senior Planner Phone Number: (909) 694-6400 Signature: Date: June 17. 2004 . Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning . ITEM #5 . . . . . STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: June 16, 2004 Prepared by: Emery J. Papp, AICP Title: Senior Planner File Number Application Type: Sign Program PA04-0215 Project Description: A comprehensive sign program for the "village" commercial portion of the Temecula Creek Village Project, located on the south side of Highway 79 South between Jedediah Smith Road and Avenida De Missiones Recommendation: (Check One) [8J Approve with Conditions 0 Deny 0 Continue for Redesign 0 Continue to: 0 Recommend Approval with Conditions 0 Recommend Denial CEQA: (Check One) [8J Categorically Exempt (Class) 15311 0 Negative Declaration 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Applicant: Bruce Heinzel, Motivational Systems Completion Date: May 13, 2004 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: August 13, 2004 General Plan Designation: Professional Office Zoning Designation: PDO-4 R:lSigns\2004\P A04-0215 Motivational SystemslST AFF REPORT.doc 1 Site/Surrounding Land Use: . Site: Multi-Family Housing and Commercial buildings under construction North: South: East: West: Vacant (Rancho Community Church) Open Space (Temecula Creek) Vacant Vacant (Creekside Plaza) Lot Area: 5 acres Total Floor Area/Ratio N/A Landscape Area/Coverage N/A Parking Required/Provided N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY ~1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff. ANALYSIS On December 12, 2001, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA 01- 0611, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of 400 apartment units and 121,000 square feet of commercial/office/retail space on approximately 32 acres. At the time of approval, projects such as this were not required by the Development Code to prepare a sign program concurrently with the Development Plan. Building elevations for the project did not indicate proposed location for signs, and the project was not conditioned to prepare a sign program. . The apartments and the Village commercial area of Temecula Creek Village are currently under construction. The owner of Temecula Creek Village has commissioned Motivational Systems to prepare a Comprehensive Sign Program for the development. On March 25, 2004, the applicant submitted a Comprehensive Sign Program Application for the Village commercial area consisting of four office/retail buildings that are one- or two-stories in height. Since the Planning Commission did not have a prior opportunity to review signage for this project, staff made an administrative decision to bring this sign program to the Planning Commission for review and approval. The applicant is also proposing second-story signage on one building, which is another factor that influenced staff's decision. The sign program proposes ten different types of signs, for a combined total of 52 signs. The sign program provides clear direction on the number of signs permitted for each sign type as follows: Sign A, Project Entry Identification, 1 sign . Sign B, Main Entry Major Tenant Monument, 1 sign (6 panels x 2 sides = 12 panels) . RolS;gn,I2004\PA04,O215 Mot;vationol Sy,¡eOliISTAFF REPORT,doc 2 . . . Sign C, Secondary Major Office Tenant Monument, 2 signs (4 panels x 2 sides x 2 signs = 16 panels) Sign D, Primary Freestanding Multi-Tenant Directory, 1 sign Sign E, Retail Tenant Identification Arcade Sign, 15 signs Sign F, Upper Floor Tenant Identification, 6 signs (2 panels x 1 side x 6 signs = 12 panels) Sign G, Major Office Tenant Identification, 4 signs Sign H, Secondary Office Tenant Directory Lobby Sign, 3 signs Sign I, Retail Tenant Rear Door Identification Sign, 14 signs Sign J, Building Address Plaque, 5 signs Staff has reviewed the proposed sign program and compared it to the sign regulations in the Development Code. Staff feels that the overall quality of design will enhance the development, but some of the proposed signs do not conform to the design standards found in the Development Code. The following is a description of the conflicting areas: Sions Band C. These signs are internally illuminated cabinet signs with detachable face plates for tenant identification. These signs are identical in their use of materials, but sign B is taller and can accommodate two extra panels on each side. Combined, these two signs can accommodate a total of 28 (5'6" by 6") panels. The Development Code requires architectural elements at the top, base and sides of these signs. As proposed, these signs only meet this requirement at the base. The sides and the top of these signs propose a faux finish on the cabinet to resemble a slate appearance. Also, the tenant panels extend across the width of the sign face, preventing architectural elements from being placed on the sides. Signs Band C as proposed are at the maximum height permitted by code. Incorporating architectural elements on the top of the signs will require a reduction in overall height for each sign. As proposed, there is sufficient room on the sides of both signs to add an architectural element. The applicant has expressed this design as the preferred alternative. Staff feels there is a need to enhance these signs by adding architectural elements to the top and sides of each sign, per the Development Code. (Conditions of Approval number 13 through 15). Sian E. These signs are internally illuminated cabinet signs with removable face plates for tenant identification. While wall mounted cabinet signs are prohibited, the Development Code is silent on cabinet signs mounted under an arcade. These signs are held in-place with an ornamental wrought iron bracket. As a result, the cabinet signs and the wrought iron will have uniform shape and size (13.5 square feet) for all storefronts, with a minimum eight foot clearance from the sidewalk to the underside of the sign. Staff is concerned with the issue of internal illumination. As a proposed Condition of Approval, staff recommends the insertion of an opaque backing plate behind the sign face, stamped or cut in such a way to illuminate only the text and graphic elements of the sign R,lSigns\2004\PAO4-0215 Motivational SystemslSTAFF REPORTdoc 3 face. Other suitable methods of preventing the background of the sign copy from being illuminated shall be considered to address this issue (Condition of Approval number 16). . Sian F. These signs are similar in nature to Sign E, but are intended for second-story tenants. Each sign will have two removable face plates with a maximum area of five square feet each. These signs will be attached to the sides of the building at approximately mid-level of the second story with ornamental wrought iron brackets similar to those used for Sign E. Again, staff is concerned with the issue of internal illumination, and recommends Condition of Approval number 16 to address this issue. Staff has no issues with any of the other proposed signage. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IX] 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 11, Accessory Structures, Section 15311 (a)) CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDA TION Staff has determined that the proposed Sign Program, subject to the proposed Conditions of Approval, for the Temecula Creek Village development complies with the purpose and intent of the sign standards of the Development Code. Staff believes the proposed sign program will enhance the development and more fully accomplish adopted sign standards. As a result, staff recommends approval of the proposed sign program as conditioned. . FINDINGS Sign Program (Code Section (17.28.080B) 1. The proposed sign program will preserve and improve the appearance of the City as viewed from Highway 79 South, and the allowable signage is appropriate for effective business signage by combining common design elements. 2. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants. 3. The proposed sign program, as conditioned, satisfies the intent or objectives of the Development Code and will enhance the development. The proposed program results in appropriate sign age that compliments the building architecture and aesthetics. ATTACHMENTS 1. PC Resolution 2004- - - Blue Page 5 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 2. 3. Proposed Sign Program - Blue Page 12 . Notice of Exemption - Blue 13 R:lSigns\2004\P AO4-0215 Motivational SystemslST AFF REPORT-doc 4 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PC RESOLUTION 2004-- R:lSigns\2004\PA04-0215 Motivational SystemslSTAFF REPORT,doc 5 c~:'::"':'?:.'::":"ni~~~ . ,,-- .~, ._~""~-; .::¡:.::.""--=-"",=.,~¡--:--::.",..,, . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0215, TO ADOPT A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE "VILLAGE COMMERCIAL" AREA OF TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS 961-010- 025 THROUGH -031, -033 THROUGH -035, AND -037. WHEREAS, Motivational Systems, filed Planning Application No. PA04-0215, a Comprehensive Sign Program Revision "Application", in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 16, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.28.080.B of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed sign program will preserve and improve the appearance of the City as viewed from Highway 79 South, and the allowable signage is appropriate for effective business signage by combining common design elements. B. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants. C. The proposed sign program, as conditioned, satisfies the intent or objectives of the Development Code and will enhance the development. The proposed program results in appropriate signage that compliments the building architecture and aesthetics. RolSignsl2004\PA04-0215 Motivational SystemslSTAFF REPORT-doc 6 Section 3. Environmental Compliance. This project is exempt from review under CEQA, pursuant to Section 15311 (Class 11 Categorical Exemption - Accessory Structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. . Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Comprehensive Sign Program Application, as set forth on attached Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 16th day of June 2004. John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] . STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of June 2004, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary . RlSigml2004\PA04-0215 Motivationat SystemslSTAFF REPORT-doc 7 . . . EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0215 Motivational Systems\ST AFF REPORT-doc 8 '7-: ,':~::;::':1:Þj;,""~¡¡;:-~",,...~, ';,;:'7!,,'£J1 ~--, -~, . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA04-0215 Project Description: Approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program for the "village" commercial portion of the Temecula Creek Village Project located on the south side of Highway 79 South between Jedediah Smith Road and Avenida De Missiones Approval Date: June 16, 2004 Expiration Date: June 16, 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims. actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees. consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action. or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. R:\Signs\2004\P A04-02l5 Motivational SystemslST AFF REPORT,doc 9 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. . The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty day prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. The erection of signs on the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D" (Sign Program), contained on file with the Planning Department. Landscaping around freestanding monument signs shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Conceptual Landscape Plan), on file with the Planning Department. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. . If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. 9. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. 10. Signs placed within the California Department of Transportation (CaITrans) "clear zone" along Highway 79 South shall require a line of sight analysis to demonstrate that vision will not be obscured for vehicles entering and exiting the site. 11. All freestanding monument signs shall be required to incorporate architectural elements of the center into the design of each sign, including the top and sides, pursuant to Section 17.28.070 of the Development Code, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning. . R,lSign,\2004\P A04-0215 Motivational Sy,,«ru;IST AFF REPORT-doc to . . . 12. Individual tenant panels on freestanding monument signs shall not extend across the entire face of the monument sign. Architectural elements shall be required on the sides of the signs. Tenant storefront signs shall incorporate an opaque backing plate behind the sign face to prevent illumination of the background of the sign copy. Other methods of achieving this result shall be considered by the Director of Planning. 13. 14. Illumination of all signs shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance No. 655 to reduce impacts on the Mount Palomar Observatory. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 15. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage- By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name R\Signsl2004\PA04-0215 Motivational SyslemslSTAFF REPORT-doc II . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM R:lSigns\2004\PA04-0215 Motivational SystemslSTAFFREPORTdoc 12 ~\':-:;:~2:::::,S;:'i?:~""_b~- , ",;lie;;, ~<~",;"-,,,-';;;;"-"'~':' ',"-.J.. -~-- """""'5;;¿-J!"~??¡w::~-':- :c: ' . . Q = ... 00 æ ~ ~ 00 ~ 00 .... ~ = = ' IIIIIIIC ~ ~ ~ ... ~ = ~ m ~-I ~- ~« cE ~I- I.~,~:, ~: H ~ " ~. ('oJ (L ~ 5:' « ~« <iC"'J :¿:=:; ~- E--> :\ TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNAGE DESIGN THEME: TEMECULA CREEK TENANT SIGN CRITERIA DEFINITION OF TERMS REQUIRED & PROHIBITED SIGNS MAP & SIGN LOCATION LEGEND VEHICLE SIGHT LINE PLANTING LEGEND PRIMARY IDENTITY SIGNAGE - SIGN TYPE A- Proiect Main Entry Identification Monument SIGN TYPE B- Main Entry Major Retail Tenant Monument SIGN TYPE C- Secondary Major Office Tenant Monument SIGN TYPE D- Freestanding Multi-Tenant Directory SECONDARY IDENTITY SIGNAGE - SIGN TYPE E - Retail Tenant Identification Arcade Sign SIGN TYPE F - Upper Floor Office Tenant Identification Signage SIGN TYPE G- Major Office Tenant Identification WAYFINDING - SIGN TYPE H- Secondary Office Tenant Directory SIGN TYPE I - Retail Tenant Signage ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE - SIGN TYPE J - Building Address Plaque . . 2 3,4 5,6 7,8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18,19 20 21 22,23 . . SI!AGE DESIGN THEME: TEMECULA CIEK The primary obiective in the signage design for Temecula Creek was to create an image and a mood consistent with Temecula's unique atmosphere: quaint vineyard charm with the conveniences of modern development. We also wanted to create a continuous theme within the mixed-use development including Temecula Creek Village Retail and the gated residential area by utilizing a slight variation of the same logo. The timeless, up-scale, craftsman-style logomark was rendered with a color-palette change to differentiate the two developments while still tying them together os 0 community. The residentiollogo will appear in stained glass while the retail logo will be in dark rust and bronze. Natural materials and earthy colors in the sign are enhanced by the surrounding terrain and illustrate the builder's attention to detail and concern for the city's environment. Open sign structures emulate the square shape of the logomark and further demonstrate the quality of the builder. Signs are also intended to creote a sense of arrival and permanence in the community with striking details and illumination, while still functioning as visible, legible directional signoge for both pedestrian and vehicular woyfinding. poge 2 TENANT SIGN CRITERIA The effective regulation of signage, while insuring proportional exposure for all tenants in a multi-use retail development, is an important factor in the success of the development. Guidelines which provide signage as an architectural design element will contribute to the character of the community. It is the intent of the following guidelines to define criteria which will generate a balanced and effective signage program. Conformance to the criteria shall be strictly enforced ond any non-conforming signs shall be removed by the tenant or his sign contractor at their expense. 1. Each tenant shall be allowed to have a primary identification sign (with the exception of building C-7, see paragraph seven for specific criteria). Primary identification signs are those that face toward Highway 79 South and the multi-tenant pedestrian oriented directory display located in the interior courtyard. 2. Maior retail tenonts shall be allowed tenant identification panels on the D/F moin entry Freestonding illuminated monument disploy. A moximum of six tenants will be allowed on this sign. Avoilobility will be determined on 0 first come first serve bosis os determined by londlord. Configuration, color, and letterstyle shall conform to speciFicotion shown on example elevation "Sign Type B." 3. Moiar office tenants shall be allowed tenant identification ponels on the D/F secondory freestonding illuminated monument disploy. A moximum of four tenonts will be allowed on this sign. Avoilability will be determined on 0 first come First serve bosis as determined by londlord. Configuration, calor, and letterstyle shall conform to specification shown on exomple elevotion "Sign Type C" 4. Each tenont sholl be ollowed tenant identificotion on the freestanding D/F multi-tenant directory display. Sign intended to direct pedestrians with a site mop ond identifying nomes with suite numbers of tenonts. Configurotion, color, and letterstyle shall conform to specification shown on exomple elevation "Sign Type D." . 5. Each retail tenant located on the bottom floor in buildings C-8 and C-1 0 shall be allowed one S/F internolly illuminated tenont identificotion sign on the orcade wall under open possoge between columns located porollel to storefront Configuration, color, ond letterstyle sholl conform to specification shown on example elevation "Sign Type E." 6. Each office tenont located on the upper floor in building C-8 shall be allowed spoce on one S/F internally illuminated tenant identification flagsign mounted to upper floor exterior building, parollel to arcode wall. Moximum two tenonts per sign. Configuration, color ond letterstyle sholl conform to specification shown on example elevotion "Sign Type F." 7. Major office tenants sholl be allowed individual internally halo-illuminoted reverse chonnelletters ond logo. Moximum two tenants will be allowed tenant identification on orcode wolilocoted in front of office building C-7. Maximum one tenont will be allowed tenant identificotion on office building C-9 front and reor building fascia. Avoilobility will be determined on a first come first serve bosis as determined by landlord, Configuration, color and letterstyle shall conform to specification shown on example elevation "Sign Type G." 8. Eoch office tenant locoted on the upper floor in building C-8 (moximum 12 tenonts), both floors in building C-7 (maximum 6 tenonts) and ground floor of building C-9 (maximum 6 tenants) sholl be allowed tenant identification on the wall mounted S/F directory disploys locoted in lobbies of C-7, C-8 and C-9. Sign intended to direct pedestdons from the lobby area to tenonts located on the upper floor in C-8, both floors in C-7 and ground floor in C-9 with identifying names and suite numbers of tenants. Configuration, color and letterstyle sholl conform to speciFicotion shown on exomple elevation "Sign Type H." . page 3 . . . . . TENANT SIGN CRITERIA 9. Eoch retoil tenant shall be allowed tenont identification an rear shop door far delivery service identifying suite number and tenant name. Canfigurotian, color and letterstyle shall conform to specification shown an example elevation "Sign Type I". 10. The design of all signs sholl reflect the choracter and flavor of the center. Design opproval will be based upon compatibility with the storefront design ond with regard for the choracter intended for the overall development. 11. The tenant shall pay for their individual identification signs, installation and maintenance. Tenant shall be responsible for removal of any channel type letters. 12. All signs and their installation must comply with all local building and electrical codes. 13. All work must be of best quality and identical in workmonship, materials, and color to other signs in the center, landlord reserves the right to reject any non-conforming submittal or any completed sign which, in their iudgment, is below standard in quolity or workmanship. 14. No animoted, flashing, or audible signs shall be permitted. 15. No exposed raceways, crossovers, conduits, conductors, transformers, etc. shall be permitted. 16, Sign contractor sholl provide 011 necessary fastening and brocing to securely instoll signs Ifor wind loods, etc.). Penetrations through walls or roo.fs sholl be floshed or seoled by the sign contractar in 0 manner approved by the landlord. 17. Three drowings or sets of drawings of the proposed sign design, including one showing the signs in full color, shall be submitted to the londlord for approval. 18. Owner reserves the right to accommodole revisions, make changes 10 this comprehensive progrom at a future date, resubmit and institute changes with approval of the city of Temecula. poge 4 DEFINITION OF TERMS Acrylic - Often used asa generic term for plastics used in signmoking. Acrylic is a type of plastidPlexiglasÆ, Acrylite, are well known trade names) characterized by clarity, transparent and opaque color ranges, and paintobility. It also has excellent machinability. Backer - A part that strengthens or supports from the rear. Backlit Sign - A sign consisting of a cabinet containing a light source surrounded by one or more translucent faces, which may be illuminated for visibility. Base - The foundation or support of freestanding sign. Bronze - An alloy of copper and tin with traces of other metals (zinc, nickel, and lead), used for sculpture, sign plaques, and dimensional lettering. Letters or forms can be cut out of solid material (using a band saw or a wateriet). It can be cast (sand-cast, ceramic maid-cast). It can be fabricated from thin sheets to create dimensional letters (fabricated and soldered), Bronze signs moy be lacquered to prevent oxidation, pre-oxidized, or left to oxidize naturally. Many finishes are available; patinaed, oil-rubbed, clear-Iaquered, polished, brushed, etc. Can - An informal term for the edge and components of electric signs. Some sign companies buy ready-made cans and only manufacture the faces of electric signs, Also called sign cabinet. Channel Letter - The outline of a letter, with metal returns, into which a neon tube is placed. The depth of the cannel may vary, depending on the viewing angle. The channel letter may be open-faced, plastic-faced, or a reverse channel letter with halo illumination. . Directory - Usually a list of names of people, offices, or destinations at a specific building, facility or public venue. May provide text listings or include maps, site plans or diagrams. Double Face - A sign with two parallel but opposing faces. Elevation - A scale drawing of the side, front or rear of a particular structure. Etching - A method similar to sandblasting, used primarily for marking gloss- A stencil of the artwork is either hand- or computer-cut and applied to the glass, which is then brushed with an acid mixture such as ammonium and sodium biFiouride. After a specified length of time, the surface is washed and the stencil removed. Faux - A painted finish done in a manner to resemble something else. Fluorescent Lamp / Tube - A type of lamp in which the light is produced by the Fluorescence of 0 phosphor coating in the tube. The coated tube is filled with a mix of gas and mercury. when electrical current posses between the electrodes, the gas mixture emits ultraviolet (UV) light. The UV light is absorbed by the phosphors, which then radiote the energy os visible light- A starter and ballast help regulate the current and voltage necessary to ionize the gases in the tube: Fluorescent lomps are more efficient than incandescent bulbs and are a popular source of illumination for may signs. Font - A specific style and group of letterforms consisting of one complete set of letters, numerals, symbols, and punctuation used for composing written communications in a given typeface. Typically provided in digital form (formerly available in hot metal and photographic composed typography). Fonts come in various weights (i.e., light, regular, bold and black weights). Many fonts also are provided in italic formats. Fonts can be condenseâ (made to look narrower) or extended (wider). page 5 . . . . DEFINITION OF TIMS Halo - A ring of light, the effect achieved by reverse channel letters, which appear to be ringed by light because the light source is reflecting on the background from which the letters are pinned out. Illuminated Sign - A sign which is lighted by either an internal electrical source or external flood lights. Inblast - Process by which copy or images are recessed into the face of a sign by shooting abrasives under pressure or sandblasting. Logo - An often stylized group of letters, words, symbols, or shapes used to represent a business or product. plan View - As viewed from above, looking down. PMS (Pantone Matching System) - Standardized series of thousands of colors, each with specific color formulations as identification number. PMS colors are duplicated in swatch books and in computer-graphics programs to allow exact duplication of colors in color printing and other marking or painting processes, such as signmaking. Pylon - A freestanding sign that is not a pole or ground sign. Retainer - The proiecting rim around the sign face that holds it in place. Reveal - A recessed area in the face of a wall or sign to visually break up continuous space. Routing - Elimination of material in a substrate, using a tool bit that has been machined for this purpose. In computerized signmaking, using a CAD/CAM machine, a tool is programmed to eliminate material along a tool path created along x-, yo, and z-axes. Satin Finish - Dull rather than highly polished or glossy. Slate - A natural rock that comes in a variety of colors. often used for the architectural enhancement of buildings. Substrate - The material out of which the face is made. Wood, metal sheeting, paper, and acrylic are some examples of sign substrates. Tenant Panel - A panel that contains the tenants identifying name and / or logo, Veneer - A non-structural facing of brick, stone, concrete, or tile attached to a backing for the purpose of ornamentation, protection or insulation. Vinyl Letters - Letters cut from adhesive-backed material, in dozens of opaque, translucent, metallized, and transparent colors and patterns. poge 6 REQUIRED SIGNS REQUIRED & PROHIBITED SIGNS The following items are not part of this MSI submittal package, but will be inclusive in overall landscaping and engineering packages required to meet regulatory criteria by the city. A. All Regulatory Type Signs B. Post and Painted Parking Lot Graphics C. No Parking Fire Lane Signs D. No Outlet E. Traffic Directional F. Exit Only, One Way Entrance or Entry Only Signs G. Emergency Phone Signs H. Do Not Block Driveway L Handicapped Accessible J. Maximum Occupancy Signs PROHIBITED SIGNS (17.28.040) All signs nat expressly permitted by this Chapter are prohibited, including but not limited to the following. No application For sign permit, development plan, or other application For a prohibited sign sholl be accepted, acted upon, or approved. A. Abandoned Signs (as defined in Section 17.28.900 D) B. Amenity Signs (signs which identify the amenities provided in a multi- family complex that are visible from public streets) C. Animated or Moving Signs (except for time and temperature displays pursuant to Sections 17.28.050 S) D. Bunting (unless approved by a sign program) . E. Cabinet or Can Signs (wall mounted) F. Commercial Off-Premise Signs (except as expressly permitted by this Chapter) G. Commercial Signs next to Residential Areas When commercial and industrial developments are facing residential uses and are located on the same local street (60 foot right-of-way or less) as the residential uses, Freestanding signs associated with these developments are prohibited. Wall signs which provide identification For businesses to pedestrions may be authorized by a sign program, provided that the illumination of the signs does not negatively impact residential uses. H. Day-Glow Colors for Window Signs I. Decorative Flags (unless approved through a sign program and then only if limited to focal points within the proiect) J. Loud Speakers or Signs Which Emit Sound, Odor, or Visible Motter, Except as Authorized by this Chapter K. Off-Site Subdivision Signs (except as otherwise permitted in Section 17.28.800, Kiosk Signs or Section 17.28.130, Subdivision Signs) L. Pennants and Streamers M. Portable Signs on Private Property N. Signs Constituting a Traffic Hazard No person shall install or maintain or cause to be installed or maintained any sign which simulates or imitates in size, color, lettering or design any traffic sign or signal, or which makes use of words stop, danger, or any other words, phrases, symbols or characters in such a manner as to interfere with, mislead or confuse vehicular or pedestrian traffic. O. Signs in Proximity to Utility Lines page 7 . . . . . . REQUIRED & PROHIBITED SIGNS No permit sholl be issued for any sign, and no sign shall be constructed or maintained, which has less horizontal or vertical clearance from authorized communication or energized electrical power lines than that prescribed by laws of the state or duly promulgated rules and regulations. P. Signs located Above the Eave line and Roof Signs (signs integrated into an architectural feature are not considered to be above the eave line) Q. Signs on Doors, Windows or Fire Escapes No sign structure shall be installed, relocated or maintained so as to prevent free ingress to or egress from any door, window or fire escape. No sign of any kind shall be attached to a stand pipe or fire escape, except those signs as required by other adopted Codes or Ordinances. R. Signs Within The Public Right-of-Way or Attached to Any Public Property Signs in any public right-of-way or signs which project over or into a public right-of-way, or which are attached to the public property, are prohibited. S. Vehicle Signs Signs located on or affixed to a motor vehicle or trailer (as those terms ore deFined in the CaliFornia Vehicle Code), whether parked on private property or public right-oF-way, For the purpose of advertising products or services or directing people to a business or activity. This paragraph does not apply to standard advertising or identiFication practice where such signs are painted on or permanently attached to a business or commercial vehicle, so long as such vehicle is licensed and Fulli operable, and the signs on such vehicle are not in violation of the Vehicle Code. page 8 '" ø C> c "- . . \ \ t ~ ÆÆ~ ~~ ~g~~g g~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ z~ ~ hH~~~9~ i §~~si§~~~~ ~ h~~3H~~~ " ~~~H~~~ê~ 9~~,,~"'~~;¡j:R ~::¡::¡:n¡:::Swi!;:':'~ " Ht~~15"'ta ~t¡~ê§~~~:Sê§ê~ . ~¡§H~~8~~ ~~ .,,-::¡,"&,~~::¡:g~s\:¡" "~';¿'¿~,U):i:,',: ~; . . ~ Mg¡¡¡rational .f.I~ S~s IDe .50,01,,0 DPh_I' .'""..", 1""""'" D Do"" D SooHl. ""'1"""'" ""1"""" D c,,~o D 5o'rom",~ "'"",.,'" """""" Dlo,V.,.,. Df~~ ""'"".." """","" DU~mo~ "",u""" LAWN AREA TYP. fRO1ECT TEMECULA CREEK CUENT A.W. PROPERTIES 108# 1 - 7615 - 56 AE 6RUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORETTA TYLER ORIGINAL DATE PROPOSED BUILDING :3-10-04 """'IONS 1 STORY 6.000 S.,. SCAlE NOTED MAC FILE NAME iGD.2¡ TEMECULA CREEK LINE OF SITE" ,.,., MONUMENT SIGN PLANTING rJ;J CUENT APfROVAl Dlul, DW1.""'~I'¡ 1 "" "O", ,,-,. ... y-....-,..-......,..,..,."",... --"""'--~~"'-'-~. """"""""""""'. """"'" " """"""......,.~,.,"""",,,,"." ""-"""'-'m""~"""""'-'" "'-'....."", ",---~-_.".""'.....~.'"' '_""_"."""""""-~,..,..",,,.. page 10 GRAPHIC SCÞJ..E " a .., J .. ~ m II U In,. -II ~, ,11 r 1)¡4 ~:II" 11... ~ I' ,1 ~ i. ~ r. HII j~ ~ I.. ~III'" j;G .... 1'"0._-- , Pl.ANTI'IQ L.EŒ3IÐ SYNBOL ASBREVIATION I OOTANIOAL N.'ME CONNON NANE SIZE I NUMBER RENAR,," TREES, f;¡ COCo PUJ. COCOS PLUN""" QUEEN PAlM e' CLR_TR. 1B PL-'"T PER Dcr"L °c:) lAG. F- 'T,' lAGER""'OE",A FAUER' 'lUSCARORA' REO CREPE MYR1l£ ;e' BOX e OOUBLE STAKE /H"'HT 10'-12' . SPREAO 5'-7' NIN. PLA RAe. PLAW<US RAeEN""" ClLJl'ORNIA SY",,"ORE "',/1<8./3' OB/'B/2 DOUSLE STAKE /HGHT 7-8'/9-10/10-12 . SPR.2'-3'/3-5/5-7 MIN. °0 POO- CRA. POOOCARPUS ORACILIOR FERN PINE ..' BOX 17J DOUBLE STAKE /H"'HT 8-10' . SPRfAO 3'-.' NIN, our- ENO. Qu,"CUS rHG"NANIl ENe,,"AN IW< '5 ""L. .. DOUBLE STAKE HEIGHT 7-9' , SPREAD .'-3' NIN. °G PIN. £lO. PINUS "-"'RICA MDNCELL PINE 15 o./24"B. 33/17 OOUBLE STAKE /HEIBHT 7-8' . SPREAD 2"-3- NIN. KOE. .P. KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA CHINESE F1AME TREE ,.' BOX "g Doum S1J\KE /HEIGHT e-ID' , SPRfAO 3'-.' NIN. SHRUBS' . _,,'OA' """"'NTHUS AFRlelNUS 'OUEEN ANNE' ULY OF THE NILE 1 GAl 045 FULL "BUSHY 0 HEN. HYB. H""EROCAWS H"'RIOS 0A'1UL Y 1 GAl 4178 FULL" BUSHY (500 ORANCE " YELLOW) 0 PHO. ."". PHOTINIA ""AS"" PHO11NIA ,.... ,.. 'UeL " BUSHY <D PIT. T. 'V,' PITlUSPDRUM TOBIRA ""'"IE"""" VARmlTED TOBIRA , GAL 922 FULL" BUSHY 0 ESC. FAA. ESCALWNIA """',"I ESCAI.l.DNIA 5 GAL 279 FUlL" BUSHY 0 NAN. OON. NANDINA OONE!rnCA HfAVENLY BAMBCO 5 GAL 159 FULL" BUSHY @ PIT, T. 'w,' PITlUSPORUM 'IOBIRA 'WHEELERI' WHEELER'S DWARF TOSIRA , GAL ",7 FULL" BUSHY @ RAP. I. 'J,E.' RAPHIOlEPlS INDICA 'JACK EVANS' ANI< ""WTHORN , GAL "24 FULL "BUSHY 0 HEr. MO. HmRON= AROurlfOu. 1U"tQN 5 GAl 247 FULL" BUSHY @ CIS. PUR. CISlUS PURPUREUS ORCHID ROCKROSE , GÞL 42' FULL" BUSHY ø PHQ. TEN- PHORMIUN TE"", NEW ZEALAND FlAX 5 GAl 627 FULL" BUSHY @J OlE. "'B. OIETES vro"" FORlWIGHT IRIS , GAl 1447 FUlL" BUSHY VINES, ....,.... PAR- TRI. PARn<ENOCISSUS TRICUSPI""'A BOSTON IVY , GAL . ATTACH '10 wÞU, LAW... ß:R;J FES. ARU. FES11JCA ARUWD"""-' WATERSA"'" , FESCUE I """ROSEEO A8 REO'O. '5 LBS,! 1.000 S.F. - JILL TASER " (OOg) 463-487B NULCH " GROUND COVER: NOT 5HOI\I< WOOD NUlCH DESIGNER WOOD CHIPS-50/SD COLORED WOOD NULCH I ,. MAX, IS REo'D. 2' DEEP-CORONA SUPPLY (949) 551-0383 . . ~ Motivational ~~ Systems Ioe . So" 0... .""""" Oo,~. "03'_'" Dc,.,", 100""""" Ol..V.... ."""~'" 0 Li,._.. ""'~"" OPh~,,', """,..." 0 s.... """57""" 0 So=m,",' "'"'OS"", Of..- """".'" PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CliENT A.W. PROPERTIES JOB# 1 - 7615 - 56 " £ RUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORElTA TYLER ORIGINAL DATE 3-10-04 REVISIONS SCAlf MAC fllf NAME iGD-'1 TEMECULA CREEK PLANTING LEGEND CUENT AfPROVAl 0..', OWllh'ß','ool'l ,.,..... '-"'-'~-""'O'~'-~""" ."""""""-,"",-,-,.......... Th""~~"~""""",,ho..... ."""""'.',",.,...."".. ...............~""_.......""',._,. """",~...,-.., CoOon"--~-.........~,,..,~.,. '-~"-."'.""""""""'~"'"'.. page 11 . /. "~ I ,,/ .:J--> \::.. LO~~~:.PE ~[! ,.. 'à(MHULA CR~. /~p '\.~ ' -t V ILL AGE ..------- ..-<>-Ø" ~:::s ....---' -"~ . ------.... ...--'-~--- -. .----..-.--..-..- ~::;::7-- PLAN VIEW OF WALL fl' t - --., -------------- -"-=----"'"' ,=. . " - .,. --~'-r- . . B ! A ....... ." '. ----~ "¡ LEFT! RIGHT . -". ., ~.~~ 24'-6 ; "". --:JÕb~~ ~~f~fED ¡ -, "'-""'-r------ -eo'_~Œ - , W.&,"', "'.0' ¡ -- 18'-0" I I e-~ ~-~ ! I I 14" ¡ K"'I;(II."~II"'iII"J"~"I¡r".~lr'J~.~It ~III~ ;I~I. QUANTITY 1 . CURVED RETAINING WALL -- RETAINING WALL ENHANCED ON FRONT AND SIDES WI EL DORADO CHEYENNE LIMESTONE VENEER& ELDORADO SANTA BARBARA 12" X 20" X 5 3/4" THICK RUSTIC CHISEL-CUT SMOKE WALL CAP. 6' X 24'.. 6" AREA (VOID OF LIMESTONE VENEER) FOR GRAPHICS is FINISHED & PAINTED TO MATCH ARCADE WALL IN RETAIL CENTER . LOGOMARK n 1/2" THICK BRONZE PLAQUE WI CUSTOM PMS 4625 DARK BROWN BACKGROUND & SAND TEXTURED FiNISH. GRAPHICS & EDGE BORDER ARE RAISED WI BRONZE 5ATIN FINISH. INSTALL 5TUD MOUNT FLUSH TO WALL. LOGO ILLUMINATED WI STANDARD GROUND MOUNT LAMPS (BY OTHERS) . LOGOTYPE --1/2" THICK METAL CUT OUTS PAINTED PMS 7517 DARK RUST. INSTALL STUD MOUNT FLUSH TO WALL. LETTERS ILLUMINATED WI STANDARD GROUND MOUNT LAMPS (BY OTHERS) SIGN TYPE r.:" w~ MOtiVational ~ SoOD~~h~O~nc 1"'1"""" 1=1"""" 0 Do"" 0 ""MIo """"""" ""","".,, 0 Corooo 0 So,ro_o~ 1000"""'" """""", ou"v.." 0""00 CO2"',.." ""'C'."02 0 ".."mo," """".,,", PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CUENT A.W. PROPERTIES JOB' 1 - 7615 - 56 Af BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORETTA TYLER ORlGINALDA" 10 - 24 - 03 REVISIONS SCAlf 1/8"=1'-0" MAC FI~ NAME ¡GD-', TEMECULA CREEK SIGN lYPE A lOGOMARK IS PROD..READV LOGOtYPE IS PROD..READY CUENT APPROVAL OA," OW",.."""", s.-. .---."", '~'-"""-"""-""""', ......,'~ M" loom ....."'""'-~ "....., ~"'-"'ro""'_."..h.._. "--',who","~".,".."",.. .-"""00"""""".'_0," ..",~.."."". ,"~""_~_.~h..h........,. -.....~h......_,_..~,~...... page 12 QUANTITY 1 6 PANELS EACH SIDE 1'-10" t ' . ,.. . , , " TOTAL12PANElS t- + °' - . SUB.- DIF BOXED STRUCTURE IS FABRICATED METAL WI FAUX l' - 11/2" t FINISH TO MATCH AMERICAN SLiI TE LIGHT BEIGE DESERT SUNSET ! + °' ;-t . ":;.:;F,::.:.J,, . MCKLIT LOGO MARK --INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BRONZE SATIN FINISH 4"',':4".<",,'~.:,"""" METAL CABINET WI ROUTED THROUGH METAL FACE FOR LINE WORK ONLY M.> . WI BRONZE SATIN FINISH. FACE BACKED WITRANSLUCENT ACRYLIC WI CALON 1159 DARK BROWN TRANSLUCENT VINYL APPLIED (TO MATCH PM5 4625 DARK BROWN) . MCKllT ROUTED LOGOTYPE -- BACKED WI TRANSLUCENT ACRYLIC WI 3M 1179 TRANSLUCENT VINYL APPLIED (TO MATCH PMS 7517 DARK RUST) \NELS -- METAL PANELS ARE PAINTED PMS 7517 DARK RUST WI NANT COPY BACKED WI TRANSLUCENT LIGHT CREAM ACRYLIC. COPY ~MITED TO TENANT NAME AND CONSIST OF GENERIC FONT "ARIAL APS AND 51ZED TO FIT. CORPORATE LEITER STYLES MAYBE USED ORDS APPROVAL. HOWEVER THE BACKGROUND PANEL WILL REMAIN RK RUST AND CORPORATE LEITER STYLE WILL REMAIN LIGHT IMUM OF ONE TENANT PER 10" X 5' -10" PANEL ED WI EL DORADO CHEYENNE LIMESTONE VENEER WI GRAY JT CAP DETAIL LD 5' - 6" MAX r I f.!;,t?:> F;-;oT~"9itJ-~T]-'lr'--T~¡:iJ-1(:lT~ U ,l:_~E_~J;o.:..l!'ì'c--lL--U_.JL-_-:dj\:!Ü_b MAX 2.75 SQ FT LANDSCAPED AREA & TYPE OF PLANTINGS AT BASE OF SIGN BY OTHERS SIGN TYPE rn . . ~ Motivational ~~ Systems IDe .50,0"'0 """",.",. 0 D,"~, ""'~"""" 0 CO"'oo """""""" Oto,v.." ""'""...'" 0 U~'m". ",."",.""" OPh~," """"au..... 0 "'"" """""""" 0 5o,"'m,"~ "",.,,""" OFÆ,"O """",."", PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CLIENT A.W. PROPERTIES JOB# 1- 7615 - 56 AE BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORmA TYLER ORiGINAlDA" 7-15-03 REVISIONS 7-29-03 10-21-03 3-10-04 SCAlE 1/2"=1' - 0" MAC FI~ NAME (GO-'! SIGN TYPE B lOGOMARK IS PROD.-READY lOGOTYPE IS PROD.-READY CUENT APPROVAL 010', Owo.'~"'"I.) ..-....-'-- -------¡;;¡; '~""~."",~~",..,,.....,I...d....- "'-.......~,..,.;""."",,-,.,-"~. """".",..1""""""""., """'."""","".",""",.. 1o"'~"""",~I""""'",,_" ....d............. "'~_....-...................'" -"""'-....."'""'_..~..._. page 13 . LANDSCAPED AREA & 1YPE OF PLANTINGSATBASE OF SIGN BY OTHERS "'!I!'l!4:~ ",un""" , 4 PANELS EACH SIDE TOTAL 6 PANELS """0"" . SUB n DIF BOXED STRUCTURE IS FABRICATED METAL WI FAUX FINISH TO MATCH AMERICAN SLATE LIGHT BEIGE DESERT SUNSET . BACKLIT LOGOMARK --INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BRONZE SATIN FINISH METAL CABINET WI ROUTED THROUGH METAL FACE FOR LINE WORK ONLY WI BRONZE SATIN FINISH. FACE BACKED WITRANSLUCENT ACRYLIC WI CALON II 59 DARK BROWN TRANSLUCENT VINYL APPLIED (TO MATCH PMS 4625 DARK BROWN) . BACKliT ROUTED LOGOTYPE -- BACKED WI TRANSLUCENT ACRYliC , ~.3M 1179 BROWN TRANSLUCENT VINYL APPLIED (TO MATCH PMS 7517 .. RK RUST) ANT PANELS -- METAL PANELS ARE PAINTED PMS 7517 DARK RUST OUTED TENANT COPY BACKED WI TRANSLUCENT LIGHT CREAM ACRYLIC. COPY SHALL BE LIMITED TO TENANT NAME AND CONSIST OF GENERIC FONT "ARIAL BOLD" ALL CAPS AND SIZED TO FIT. CORPORATE ER S1YLES MAYBE USED WITH LANDLORDS APPROVAL. HOWEVER ~GROUND PANEL WILL REMAIN PMS 7517 DARK RUST AND TE LETTER S1YLE WILL REMAIN LIGHT CREAM. MAXIMUM OF NT PER 10" X 5' - 10" PANEL ":T~HANCED WI EL DORADO CHEYENNE LIMESTONE VENEER ,Y RUSTIC CHISEL-CUT CAP DETAIL IT -- ARIAL BOLD 5' - 6" MAX r r \¡,~ ~'i"§¡~r;i1sn-!f"T'~~L'~Jï;:~-~ u cJ.:--,=~-,"c-__L~~--~----U_n -__¡¡ilL_,-=, MAX 2.75 SQ FT SIGN TYPE ~ ~ j;JQtivational ~~.tems Ine . So"DI'9° OPh~,,¡, "'""""" 10'2"'...'" 0 o.~1 0 "".. """""""' """,,""" 0 (01000 0 S'=m~,,~ ""I"'.'" ."1"""" OW,V'9" Of~", ",.""",, "'""'.2"2 OU,,~~ "",u""" PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CUENT A.W. PROPERTIES )0"' 1 - 7615 - 56 AE BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORETTA TYLER ORIGINAL DATE 7-15-03 REVISIONS 7-29-03 10-21-03 3-10-04 SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" MAC FILE NAME {GD-2¡ TEMECULA CREEK SIGN TYPE C LOGOMARK IS PROD.-READY LOGO1YPE IS PROD.READY CUENT APPROVAL 0 AI " 0 WI,h IW"'OO{I/ .,-.;.;::.'-----"--"-""'----¡¡;; '-I""~","d_'~I""",""'d.",, ~-~"""~-".";._;",,"",... Th""_"'~1"""".",,,,,-, """_'"_.,""",.,,.",.... ,."".........~I"..."".~-,," "Þ""~"M"", """"'- -~.~ _h..11.....". F. _",....h."'......_...,....""".. page 14 1~1 h N "" \Q r i 2" DEEP CAB +- DASH LINES INDICATE RECESSED 1/2" THICK BRONZE PLAQUE (FLUSH WI TOP SURFACE OF SLATE) :{ SIDE ViEW to 1 2' 8" I 1 29" MAP t , 15" t LOGO 'JI~"'n'J!ti8'JIOI~".1í. QUANTI'TY 1 . SUB -- DIF BOXED STRUCTURE IS FABRICATED METAL W/1/2" THICK 16" X 16" AMERICAN SLATE LIGHT BEIGE DESERT SUNSET FINISH ON FRONT &SIDE. METAL BASE & 1/2" REVEALS ARE PAINTED PMS 4625 DARK BROWN . "RETAIL CENTER" u INBLASTED INTO SLATE AND PAINT FILLED PMS 7517 DARK RUST . CABINET FOR DIRECTORY -- METAL CABINET WI SATIN BRONZE FINISH HAS LOCKING DOOR WI 1/4" CLEAR ACRYLIC SCUFF & ABRASION RESISTANT SECURI'TY COVER. MAP is DURA TRANS WI ILLUMINATiON PROVIDED BEHIND (MAP SHOWN NOT ACTUAL) MAP MOUNTED TO OPENING IN METAL BACKER PAINTED PMS 4625 DARK BROWN. REMOVABLE ACRYLIC TENANT NAME STRIPS MOUNTED TO METAL BACKER ARE I" X 9" PAINTED PMS4625 DARK BROWN WI PMS 4645 LIGHT BROWN COPY. SHOWN ARE (3) ROWS OF (12) TENANT NAME STRIPS FOR A TOTAL OF (36) AND (2) 12" TALL X I" WIDE VERTICAL DIVIDER STRIPS . LOGOMARK --1/2" THiCK BRONZE PLAQUE WI CUSTOM PMS 4625 DARK BROWN BACKGROUND & SAND TEXTURED FINISH. GRAPHICS & EDGE BORDER ARE RAISED WI BRONZE SATIN FINISH. PLAQUE INSTALLED FLUSH TO METAL CABINET. (4) 1/2" THICK SLATE TILES SURROUNDING LOGOMARK ARE CUT OUT AT EACH CENTER CORNER TO FIT 1/2" THICK LOGOMARK SO Irs FINISHED FLUSH WITH TOP SURFACE OF SLATE ' . FONT -- BODEGA . SIGN TYPE [!] . ~ Motivational ~~ Systems Ine .S"Di.., "",m.", Do."~, """"""" Dc~" -",.", 0 ",v..., """""'" Du~,,~. ""'u',"oo DPh~";, """,...... 0 500"- """""'" 0 So'rnm,"~ .""""", Df~." "",..".", fROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CUENT A.W. PROPERTIES JO", 1 - 7615 - 56 AE BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORETTA 'TYLER ORIGiNAl DA" 7-15-03 REVISIONS 7-29-03 10-21-03 SCA~ 3/4" = l' - 0" MAC FI~ NAME ,GD", TEMECULA CREEK SIGN 'TYPE P LOGOMARK 5 PROD.READY LOGOTYPE IS fROMEADY PLOT MAP IS NOT fROD.READY No>.,,",,1 m.,,"""""K" CUENT APPROVAl 0'" i. 0 WI- ~".I..*, ,_. ... ,~"",,'~'_""'o_'..'_, ~-~""'-"'".'~."""~' Th..~.....,.._,."",.".. ,--."""."'.'"00""'. """""""00"""""""-'" .._I~"",." Cdon_~~--"."""""',"" _....-....._'_b""~"". page 15 . 8cAL LOCATION ~ I +0< - I j 11'-0" MAX j 7-4" j I ~ ~ :3/4"=1'-0" ! ß' MINIMUM CLEARANCE FROM IJOTTOM EDGE OF SIGN TO SIDEWALK "1r'J~r.'K.,."'_r..~. QUANTI1Y 15 . SIGN -- INTERNAllY ILLUMINATED ALUMINUM CAN SIGN WI 1" WIDE RETAINER IS PAINTED PMS 75:32 DARK BRONZE. SIGN FACE IS ACRYLIC WI TRAN5lUCENT VINYL APPLIED GRAPHICS IN TENANTS REGIONAL OR NATIONAL CHAIN COLORS & LETTER STYLE DETERMINED BY TENANT & APPROVED BY lANDLORD. SIGN FACE TO BE EASILY REMOVED & REPLACED AS NECES5ARY . INTERNAL ILLUMINATION -- HIGH OUTPUT FLUORE5CENT LAMPS AS NECESSARY . MOUNTING n INSTALL UNDER OPEN PAS5AGE BE1WEEN COLUMNS IN EXISTING ARCADE WALL AT EACH TENANT LOCATION WI 11' LONG 2" SQUARE METAL TUBE WI CAPPED ENDS. SQUARE METAL TUBE DECORATIVE DETAILS ARE 11/2" 5QUARE METAL TUBE WI (2) OPEN ENDS CAPPED & (6) SQUARE OPEN AREAS AS SHOWN ABOVE, ALL MOUNTINGS & DECORATIVE DETAIL5 PAINTED PM5 7532 DARK BRONZE SIDE VIEW SIGN TYPE [) ~I' tivational ~~ terns IDe 8s,"DI.., OPh~o" ."",....", ,"'""...." 0 Doow, 0 s..o. """'II"'" ""","'", 0 c.,,", 0 5o=m". "",m"",, """""'" 0 "',v.." OF",", ."""..'" ."""."" OUwm", I""""'" PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CUENT A.W. PROPERTIES JOB# 1- 5666 - 56 AE BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER lORElTA 1YlER ORIGINAL DATE 7-15-0:3 ""'SIONS 7-29-0:3 10-21-0:3 :3-10-04 SCAlE NOTED MAC Fllf NAME (Go-'I TEMECUlA CREEK SIGN 1YPE E CUENT APPROVAL 0 '" I, 0 WI. ~"""I'I ,>.....---.---.---.-----......"., '~"-""'-"""'_.""',". -""""""'"',..._,.,,"",,"œ. ~"'œ"."'_""",,,-, ""~"""""""""'>""" """"".."",...> "'..-........,-.. "..........,... ""'._~~--"""""'...~.,. _..'m~".""","-'--~'""",,,. page 16 ~ 'Ii ---______m______------,------------------------------------------------------, PARTIAL RIGHT FRONT ELEVATION C-8 SCALE :3/:32" = l' - 0" ~ ---- ._____mn- IDE lÐN <&> 8 ~I b <&> TENANT " COPY HERE =:1/2" 8 TENANT COPY HERE ~ 2'-6" . QUANTITY 6 2 PANELS 1 SIDE III¡ r.""r'J~I.uc n"..". TOTAL 12 PANELS . SIGN -- INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED ALUMINUM CAN SIGN WI 1" WIDE RETAINER & 1/2" DIVIDER BAR 15 PAINTED PMS 7532 DARK BRONZE. SIGN FACE IS ACRYLIC WI TRANSLUCENT VINYL APPLIED GRAPHICS IN TENANTS REGIONAL OR NATIONAL CHAIN COLORS & LETTER STYLE DETERMINED BY TENANT & APPROVED BY LANDLORD, EACH SIGN TO HOLD MAX (2) TENANTS & EACH SIGN FACE TO BE EASILY REMOVED & REPLACED AS NECESSARY . INTERNAL ILLUMINATION -- HIGH OUTPUT FLUORESCENT LAMPS AS NECESSARY . MOUNTING.. INSTALL FLAG MOUNTTO WALL AT EACH TENANT LOCATION W/6' - 0' LONG 2" SQUARE METAL TUBE WI CAPPED ENDS. SQUARE METAL TUBE DECORATIVE DETAILS ARE 11/2" SQUARE METAL TUBE WI (2) OPEN ENDS CAPPED & (3) SQUARE OPEN AREAS AS SHOWN. ALL MOUNTINGS & DECORATIVE DETAILS PAINTED PMS 7532 DARK BRONZE . NOTE .- SIGN TO BE FLIPPED FOR RIGHT OR LEFT MOUNT DEPENDING ON SIGN LOCATION SIGN TYPE [¡ . ~ Motivational ~1r6I Systems IDe . S.mDlog, """""'" 0 Do,." """""'" Oc~ I-"""", 0 "',v...,. 0""""'. ou.,,~~ "",u""" o"'~¡, """""'u 0"""" .""""" 0 "',~m,"" .'.'".", 0 F~", """"-"" PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CUENT A.W. PROPERTIES JO" 1- 7615 - 56 AE BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORETTA TYLER ORIGINAL DATE 7 -15 - 03 REVISIONS 7-29-03 10-21-03 11-10-03 3-10-04 SCAŒ 3/4" = I' - 0" MAC fIŒ NAME IGD-2I TEMECULA CREEK SIGN TYPE F CUENT APPROVAL 0 '" ,. 0 WIÓ ~¡"o"I'1 ,.-,,-- ,~"-,,-,",,,.,,-,...._. """~""-~-""".'-'---- Th"~"'"""'d~",_."...._. ."od_'""""..," "",.-_Iom.. "'"-""--""'"" ,"""..,-," ........",..MO- """'--~_.............~"" -"'._".....-,.~...,~'""""_. poge 17 . . LEFT FRONT ( ELEVATION A \(I:n- ... --~~c.ØN-i' '- '-, _REAL._ES-TA1;'-E_, SIDE VIEW . . , ARCADE AT FRONT OF ¡¡LDG ELEVATION C-7 SCALE 1/8" = l' - 0" ,"'ro "" ~~r"""~~r.'~I."J.~'II.r""If"~r"""""J""""lI..1r"~'....- QUANTITY MAX OCCUPANCY 2 TENANT SIGNS . SIGN --INDIVIDUAL INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED REVERSE CHANNEL ALUMINUM LOGOTYPE AND MARK FOR HALO ILLUMINATION. MODIFICATION TO THE TENANTS LOGO OR TYPE MAYBE NEEDED SHOULD THE STROKE WIDTH NOT BE WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEON. LETTER/LOGO FACES & RETURNS PAINTED IN TENANTS REGIONAL OR NATIONAL CHAIN COLORS DETERMINED BY TENANT & APPROVED BY LANDLORD . MOUNTING -- INSTALL DIRECT ONTO EXISTING ARCADE WALL ATFRONT OF BLDG ELEVATION C-7 WI HEAVY DUTY STAND OFFS. SIGNS SHALL BE AFFIXED TO ARCADE WALL IN THE SIGN BACKGROUND AREA DESIGNATED BY LANDLORD . SIGN NOTE -- TENANT SIGNAGE SHOWN NOT ACTUAL (SHOWN FOR CONCEPT USE ONLY). OFFICE ARCADE WALL HAS MAX OCCUPANCY OF 2 TENANTS AS SHOWN IN CONCEPT PER APPROVED GUIDELINES ! 19' - 0" MAX ! ~~ .::MAJ:OR I 15' - 0" MAX ! ~~ 8:- ---M]\--J-OR¡ NË -- --- .Me -- --- LEFT FRONT ELEVATION A MAX 57 SQ FT LEFT FRONT ELEVATION B MAX 37.5 SQ FT SIGN TYPE [!J TO' ~ 8iVational ~~ ems IDe OPh~"', """,....'" 0 "".. """"..." 0 So'~m."'" ""I""'" OF~.", ","",."" .S",DI.., ",""'.", o""'~, 0001"""'" Dc,~", """""'" 0 ""v.." """"..." O""m'~ "",..,."" PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK ~I CUENT A.W. PROPERTIES JOB# 1 - 7615 - 56 AE BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORETTA TYLER FFl ORIGINAL DATI; 10-14-03 RE"SlONS 3-10-03 SCAlE 1/8" =1'-0" MAC FILE NAME (GD.') TEMECULA CREEK SIGN TYPE G lOGOTYPE/MARK TI;NANTS ARE NOT PROD.~EADV,AIIT'","ICopy'Mod. "..h,~fo,~,,~p'o'~P~" CUENT APPROVAl 0.." DwI.'~I.¡",{,) ,.-. ,.. T~,.."~.;",-"~,........"......". ,....."~""...,._"",,,;._......~. Th".~..;","".....".."",._. '-~'"-"'.'"~'.'"",,"'.' ¡"""".........~,,......,......,_.," ..........""","". o.o..._-~-"""""',..;~.'. -""'.~""""-'--""""" page 18 b ~ PARTIAL CENTER REAR BLPG ELEVATION C-9 b ¡:¡ PARTIAL RIGHT FRONT BLDG ELEVATION C-9 SCALE 3/32" = l' - 0" "".,...,~~",...~~,.'~'."J~~.. ; r."..r."....,.".M"'II"'~'...,reJ~'.~eJ- QUANTITY 2 . SIGN -- INDIVIDUAL INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED REVERSE CHANNEL ALUMINUM LOGOTYPE AND MARK FOR HALO ILLUMINATION, MODIFICATION TO THE TENANTS LOGO OR TYPE MAYBE NEEDED SHOULD THE STROKE WIDTH NOT BE WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEON, LEITER/LOGO FACES & RETURNS PAINTED IN TENANTS REGIONAL OR NATIONAL CHAIN COLORS DETERMINED BY TENANT & APPROVED BY LANDLORD . MOUNTING --INSTALL DIRECT ONTO EXISTING BUILDING AT RIGHT FRONT OF BLDG ELEVATION C-9 WI HEAVY DUTY STAND OFFS. SIGNS SHALL BE AFFIXED TO BUILDING IN THE SIGN BACKGROUND AREA DESIGNATED BY LANDLORD I 19' - 0" MAX t O[ r--------------------.-----------¡ ~ ~.P~_~_~œ_~_~ 92SQFT SCALE 1/8" = l' - 0" SIGN TYPE rn . . ~ Motivational .I.I~ Systems IDe . So..DI.." """,...", 0 Do..~. """"'""'" OC"',,oo """""'" 0 1.0. v"", .""""'" OU"'m~. I""~""'" OPh~..,. """"""~ 0 ""0. """s"",, 0 Soa"m.=o ""I"""'" Ofm= "SOl.."."", PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CLIENT A.W. PROPERTIES JO8# 1 - 7615 - 56 AE BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORETIA TYLER ORIGINAL DAT< 3-22-04 REVlSlONS SCAlf NOTED MAC FIlE NAME IGD-21 TEMECULA CREEK SIGN TYPE G3 lOGOTY1'E/MARK T<NANTS ARE NOT PROD.-REAOY, All T""=C,,py & Moob 0""""- """'..œp."'~p,,. CUENT APPROVAL OA>I. O'Mili"""""I'1 "_. -----------¡;;¡; Y"-"'~-""'-"'"""'.". . _~",,""........I..~;""""', Th;,'~"",,",,_,"""'-' ."""'"""'......,".~""" "-""""",~""-""",,,,,,-," "_~"h,"",,. Cokn""","_~,_--..",....~"" ~"'._,...,."'""-,;............. poge 19 . 3/4" Tï . METAL BACKER CLEAR SECURITY COVER <.') z NAME STRIPS ði "- 0 LU ¡¡S ¡¡; s: ~ t 10" j VISIBLE OPENING 3/4" g . t 10" j VISIBLE OPENING 3/4" TmT <.') z Z LU "- 0 LU ¡¡S ¡¡; s: ¡.. SMALL DIRECTORY I ENTRANCE LOBBY FOR UPPER & LOWER FLOOR OFFICE BLDG C-7 AND SMALL DIRECTORY I ENTRANCE LOBBY GROUND FLOOR OFFICE BLDG C-9 3ECTION VIEW .." ~.,.." ,.," rol,"W. ~ 'I' «,I' rø.. .'1"". .".."..~.. ~ .,¡ !1IDJ;i[(;II a'!ll.llll<ll QUANTITY 3 (1) LARGE DIRECTORY ".lm"'..J~~"""'~."'.'.'JI"""(""iII."""'iII"'I......r"'.... (2) SMALL DIRECTORY . DIRECTORY -- 3/4"WIDE X 3/4" DEEP METAL FRAME WI SATIN BRONZE FINISH HAS 1/4" CLEAR ACRYLIC SCUFF & ABRASION RESISTANT SECURITY COVER. REMOVABLE ACRYLIC TENANT NAME STRIPS MOUNTED TO METAL BACKER ARE 1" X 9" PAINTED PMS 4625 DARK BROWN WI PMS 4645 . LIGHT BROWN COPY. LARGE DIRECTORY HAS (1) ROW OF (13) TENANT NAME STRIPS AND SMALL DIRECTORY HAS (1) ROW OF (6) TENANT NAME STRIPS . FONT -- BODEGA N.T.S. CHANGEABLE WORDBAR SYSTEM ACCESSIBLE BY OPENING FRAME WI REMOVABLE SET SCREWS IN FRAME SIGN TYPE rn ~ IIVatiOnal ~~ ems IDe . So.. 0." Dp"",..,. ""I""'~ """"""" D D",~, D So". """,."", """"",", D Co<o.., D So'~~..10 """"""'" .""""'" D ""v.." D'~>", """"'~'" ","",."" DlI~~". """""."00 PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK ClIENT A.W. PROPERTIES 108# 1 - 7615 - 56 AE BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORETTA TYLER ORiGINAlDA" 7-15-03 "~SIONS 7-29-03 10 - 23 - 03 3-22-04 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" MAC FILE NAME (GD.'I TEMECULA CREEK SIGN TYPE H CLIENT APPROVAL D.,,> DW'.'~";,"('I ....,.---------= 'œ""""',,,,_""""""""""'" ....-..""...~......""._,"",,"-- ",' " """"" M"'",..., """'.-. """""""""""""000""" ...............~",._......,...,-,. "o.d~.....MS'. """""'o."-"'""'"'."""'""'~'" -"""'-'.".""""'_.'~"""¡'. poge 20 PARTIAL REAR ELEVATION C-10 t 12" I ÌD QUANTI'TY 14 'METAL SUB -- 1/8" THICK NATURAL BRONZE . COPY -- ETCHED AND PAINT FILLED PMS 4625 DARK BROWN 'INSTALL -- MOUNTTO TENANT REAR DOOR ENTRY AS NECESSARY , FONT -- BODEGA . . 3/32" = l' - 0" 1/2" =1" SIGN TYPE D ~ Motivational ~~ Systems Ine ."'oDI..o """,....... o""~, "",-", 0 Co,ooo """".0" 0 "'_V..o- .""".." OU..m~ ","u...,., OPh"o~ 1""1"""'" OSootrlo 0""""'" 0 So,~m...'" """""'" OF."" ",.."-",, PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CLIENT A.W. PROPERTIES JO8# 1- 7615 - 56 AE BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORETTA 'TYLER ORIGINAl DATE 7-15-03 "VISIONS 7-29-03 10-21-03 3-10-04 SCAlE NOTED MAC FlŒ NAME (G1).21 TEMECULA CREEK SIGN 'TYPE I CUENT APPROVAL 0"'0 OW;.'~;""'\'I "-. ""' '__'~_"""""""';""'""" ~...~"".........~",;,._.,-,~- ThO"""'"""""""'-"""'oo. ""__""'.""0.0""".' '._."""".",......."""","-- .._....,"m';""- c,;.",-."~-""""",.,,......,," -,...~,~"..""'..".....~.'"". page 21 . FFL -..- PARTIAL RIGHT FRONT ELEVATION C-10 ~I{ SIDE VIEW PARTIAL LEFT FRONT ELEVATION C-8 PARTIAL LEFT FRONT ELEVATION C-7 SCALE 3/32" = l' - 0" j 32" I '.-, Ii [1 d ¡ I L 'I; I' 'I I: L, ADDRESS PLAQUE RIGHT FRONT ELEVATION C-10 ADDRESS PLAQUE LEFT FRONT ELEVATION C-ð ADDRESS PLAQUE LEFT FRONT ELEVATION C-7 SCALE 3/32" = 1" .""".""10"1111""'111- QUANTITY 5 ., SUB --1/2" THICK CAST BRONZE PLAQUE WI CUSTOM PMS 4625 DARK BROWN BACKGROUND & SAND TEXTURED FINISH 'NUMBERS. EDGE BORDER & INLINE BORDER DETAILS -- RAISED WI BRONZE SATIN FINISH 'INSTALL -- STUD MOUNT FLUSH MOUNTED TO EXTERIOR SURFACE AS NECESSARY 'FONT n BODEGA SIGN TYPE g =-jJIIQtivationai ~~tems IDe . So"DI." 0 ,"""", ",."'.,.. 'OW"".", oD.~" Os"",. "'" """'" ",. "..", 0 cO',", 0 So=m,"~ ",."""" "'..",.".. 0 Lo" v."' 0 F~,", """"..." "",.."."", 0 U~,m,~ '=IU'."'" PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CUENT A.W. PROPERTIES JOB> 1 - 7615 - 56 AE BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORETTA TYLER ORIGINAl DATE 3-10-04 REVISIONS SCAlE NOTED MAC FIlE NAME IGD.') TEMECULA CREEK SIGN TYPE J CU'NT APPROVAL o"'" OW1."""~I" '-" ,.; '~"",o"""'_"~""'~'..,d.." ,.........,,-,._"","'.'~'"""'~. Th'..~oo,'"""d..".,,,.,.."~. "e""""""'""',,",~"'.. """".""~o~""""""""",-" "ud.....",,","" "'-"""'"'""--"""'""e""""."" -""'*"."'._0"'*"""""'. page 22 b ¡;¡ ADDRESS PLAQUE LOCATION b ¡;¡ PARTIAL RIGHT FRONT BLDG ELEVATION C-9 j 32" j a N { PARTIAL LEFT REAR BLDG ELEVATION C-9 SCALE 3/32" = l' - 0" ADDRESS PLAQUE RIGHT FRONT ELEVATION C-9 ADDRESS PLAQUE LEFT REAR ELEVATION C-9 SCALE 3/32" = 1" SIDE VIEW "mfl> ......... , SUB --1/2" THICK CAST BRONZE PLAQUE WI CUSTOM PMS 4625 DARK BROWN BACKGROUND & SAND TEXTURED FINISH , NUMBERS. EDGE BORDER & INLINE BORDER DETAILS -- RAISED WI BRONZE SATIN FINISH 'INSTALL -- STUD MOUNT FLUSH MOUNTED TO EXTERIOR SURFACE AS NECESSARY , FONT -- BODEGA . SIGN TYPE g . ~ Motivational ~~ Systems Ine . S,oDi.., ..""...", ODo~, 1""-'" OC,ro~ 100"""'" Ola.v.." ."'""..." Oli~~", "'31«"""" 0 P""'ol. I""""""" 0 So,"" """ "...." 0 So=m,"" """""'" OF~,", ."""."" PROJECT TEMECULA CREEK CUENT A.W. PROPERTIES JOBI 1 - 7615 - 56 Af BRUCE HEINZEL DESIGNER LORElTA 1YLER ORIGINAL DATE 3-10-04 REV1S10NS SCAlE NOTED MAC FIlE NAME {GD-21 TEMECULA CREEK SIGN 1YPE J2 CUENT APPROVAl 0.." OWi.,wl"~{'1 ,.-. "'" Y~"'~",""_"~I_",.,.d"... """""""-~~"---""'"~, Th""..""""""",."AO,."._- """"""'-"""""~"'" ..,,~ -..... o~ ,..........,...., _oi, """""..h""'. CoO.......,. ~ - --. ,~, ood~. ,- _..._h..",_""""""""o page 23 . . . . '{'","" ATTACHMENT NO.3 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION R:\Signs\2004\PA04-02IS Motivational Systems\STAFFREPORT.doc 13 '.)<'¡'\o/."Ji'!'~=h~.'. -,.,,--.~-- . :";¡~':-"'.,~.. - - ~---- City of Temecula Planning Department . Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 FROM: Planning Department City of Temecula P. O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Project Title: Temecula Creek Village Comprehensive Sign Program (PA04-0215) Description of Project: A comprehensive sign program for the "village" commercial portion of the Temecula Creek Village Project. Project Location: The south side of Highway 79 South between Jedediah Smith Road and Avenida De Missiones, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, California. Project Applicant/Proponent: Bruce Heinzel, Motivational Systems The Community Development Director approved the above described activity on June 16,2004, and found that the activity is not a project and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. . Exempt Status: (check one) Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); Sec. 15268); Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); Sec. 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); Sec. 15269(b)(c)); Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) Categorical Exemption: Class 11 (Section Number 15311 (a)) Other: ,/ Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: The Comprehensive Sign Prograrn will provide attractive and convenient signage to direct onto and throughout the site. The application has been conditioned to limit the number of signs and has provided guidelines for the construction and erection of signs for this development. The proposed signs are an accessory structure to the development, and by definition, this project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the provisions of Section 15311 (a) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Contact PersonfTitle: Emery J. Papp, AICP, Senior Planner Phone Number: (909) 694-6400 Signature: Date: June 17,2004 . Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning . ITEM #6 . . . . . I ¡ STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 16, 2004 Planning Application No. PA04-0297 (Development Code Amendment) Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVATE HELIPORTS IN VARIOUS ZONES AND MAKE OTHER MINOR CHANGES" BACKGROUND A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application was submitted for a private heliport in the Light Industrial zone (42580 Rio Nedo). The CUP was approved by the Planning Director at the October 9, 2003 Directors Hearing and subsequently appealed by Councilman Jeff Stone. The justification for the appeal indicated that the proposed rooftop heliport raises many important land use issues which should be considered by the City Council including public safety and land use compatibility. Councilman Stone was concerned that no criteria currently exists within the Development Code to specifically analyze these types of facilities. In an effort to respond to the appeal and to prepare special standards, staff surveyed sixteen local jurisdictions to determine if they had regulations pertaining to private heliports. Nine of the jurisdictions had regulations (see Attachment No.4). The regulations varied widely in scope and detail. Based on these regulations and discussions with the State Aeronautics Division, staff has drafted proposed development standards specifically for private heliport facilities which would be incorporated into the Development Code. None of the standards are mandated by the State. The proposed Development Code amendment would make the following changes to the Development Code: Amend Section 17.08.030 to authorize private heliports in the Professional Office zone as a conditional use. Amend Section 17.08.030 to authorize private heliports for hospitals only in the Community Commercial (CC), Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC) and Service Commercial (SC) zones. Create siting and design criteria in Section 17.10 applicable to all private heliports- Create a supplemental approval finding specific to private heliport facilities. R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Private HelipadlST AFFRPT PC.doc Add the following definitions to Section 17-34.010: Helicopter, Private Heliport, Private Heliport for Hospital and Touchdown Liftoff Area. . ANALYSIS Development Code Section 17.08.030 allows heliports as a conditional use in the Business Park (BP) and Light Industrial (LI) zones. Moreover, Section 17.12.030 allows heliports as a conditional use in the Public Institutional (PI) zone. Currently, heliports are subject to the general development standards of a particular zoning district and the general conditional use permit and development code findings to be approved. The City's conditional use permit process includes transmittal of a proposed heliport facility to the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission which evaluates conformance with airport land use plans and land use compatibility. Upon approval of a conditional use permit at the local level, an applicant must obtain an airspace determination from the Federal Aviation Administration which confirms that proposed flight paths will not conflict with existing paths. Finally, the applicant must obtain a permit from the State Aeronautics Division which reviews the design and location of the facility relative to surrounding hazards such as tall buildings. The Aeronautics Division also undertakes a final inspection of the facility to ensure compliance with applicable design standards. Heliports in Expanded Areas of the City Staff believes the popularity of and need for private heliports may expand in the future given the ever increasing constraints on the regional transportation system- Given this potential increase, staff recommends that private heliports also be allowed in the Professional Office (PO) zoning district as a conditional use to better serve business owners and executives. Moreover, staff recommends that private hospital heliports also be allowed as a conditional use in the Community Commercial (CC), Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC) and Service Commercial (SC) zones so as to better accommodate a potential hospital facility in these areas of the City. Specific Development Standards and Approval Findinqs . In addition authorizing private heliports as a conditional use in the Professional Office zone and allowing private heliports for hospitals only in the CC, SC and HTC zoning districts, staff has also drafted siting and design criteria which address the following: Prohibiting the siting of private heliport facilities within 1,000 feet of existing or designated schools, public parks and existing and future assembly facilities having 500 persons or more seating capacity. (These requirements would serve to prohibit future uses such schools, churches and other large assembly uses on property within 1,000 feet of existing approved heliport facilities). Prohibiting the siting of the heliport's touchdown liftoff area within required yards nor within ten (10) feet of property lines. Requiring that the touchdown liftoff area be surfaced with appropriate materials and ensuring that lighting used for nighttime operations does not adversely impact adjacent residences. Prohibiting the siting of the touchdown liftoff area within twenty-five (25) feet of roof openings and exits. . R:\P P\2002\O2-0478 Private HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc . Requiring that flight operations only occur between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm weekdays except for emergency medical flights and requiring a Temporary Use Permit to operate on Saturdays and Sundays. Other Chances In order to better interpret the proposed Development Code provisions three definitions should be added to the Development Code including Helicopter, Private Heliport, and T ouchdown/Liftoff Area. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed amendment to the Municipal Code would create specific development standards and approval criteria for private heliports. However, proposed amendments would not directly allow the construction of the heliport facilities. Therefore, the proposed changes to the Municipal Code will not have an effect on the physical environment as described in the questions contained in the Initial Environmental Study. When a specific application for a private heliport is filed with the City, a determination will be made at that time as to the type of environmental review that is required to comply with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. Therefore, this amendment to the Municipal Code is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines given that the project has no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. ATTACHMENTS 1. . 2. 3. 4. PC Resolution 2004-- - Blue Page 4 Draft Ordinance - Blue Page 7 Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 12 List of Jurisdictions Surveyed - Blue Page 13 . RID P\2002\02-0478 Private HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc . ATTACHMENT NO.1 . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- . R:IP P\2002\O2-o478 Private Helipad\ST AFFRPT PC.doc 4 ",-~,'";'~'"<,,c",;,,,,:!c"?---~"""-~" ~".,'C' ~'_M~~,., :'.""""---~'¡'¡'~"'~~"'~_£te"'"~"'", :"',,',', . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVATE HELIPORTS IN VARIOUS ZONES AND MAKE OTHER MINOR CHANGES" PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04.0297 WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's Development Code; and WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the adopted Development Code to address anticipated private heliport facilities and the need for special development standards associated with those uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the amendment on June 16, 2004, ataduly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHECITY OFTEMECULADOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recommendation of Approval. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code, substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The proposed Municipal Code Amendment will not directly allow the construction of heliport facilities. The Planning Commission hereby finds that this amendment to the T emecula Municipal Code will not directly allow the development of heliport facilities and therefore will not have an effect on the physical environment. As a result, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines given that the project has no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. R:ID P\2002\O2-0476 Private HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 16~ day of June, 2004. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of June, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D P\2002\O2-o478 Private HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc . . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 DRAFT ORDINANCE R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Private HelipadlST AFFRPT PC.doc r;,;-:;:.';;~~§¡>"'-;'.~"""-"~ .,-'*-.~ ~. - . '--'--..0- ~. ."._~ "'::-...1;""-0""'. , -~",¡;"",~;;j;œ~';:';r""-_-;o..,;'; . . . ORDINANCE NO. 04-- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVATE HELIPORTS IN VARIOUS ZONES AND TO MAKE OTHER MINOR CHANGES (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0297) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plans as may be in effect in any such city; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on June 16,2004, and recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to the City Municipal Code; WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and. WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on June 16, 2004 to consider the proposed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends Table 17.08.030 to add the following uses: Section 2. The City Council ofthe CityofTemecula hereby amends Chapter 17.10 adding Subsection P to read as follows: "P: Private Heliports Conditional Use Permit Required. A Conditional Use Permit approved by the planning commission shall be required for all private heliports. All conditional use permits for heliports shall comply with the requirements of Section 17.04.010. 1. 2. Siting and Design Criteria. All private heliports shall comply with the following requirements: a. Heliports shall not be located within 1,000 feet (measured from structure to structure) of an existing or designated public or private primary, secondary or high school. R:\D P\2002\O2-0476 Private HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc 3. 4. 5. 6. b. Heliports shall not be located within 1,000 feet of an existing or proposed public park (measured property line to property line). Heliports shall not be located within 1,000 feet (measured structure to structure) of an existing or future assembly facility having 500 persons or more seating capacity. Private heliports associated with hospitals shall be exempt from this requirement. The Touchdown Liftoff Area shall not be located within any required yard area and in no circumstance shall it be located within ten (10) feet from all property lines. In addition, a one-hundred (100) foot setback shall be achieved from adjacent residentially zoned properties. The Touchdown Liftoff Area may be required to be surrounded by a fence or wall at least four feet high and constructed in such a manner as to deflect the horizontal wind velocities caused by the rotation of the rotor blades. The Touchdown Liftoff Area shall be surfaced with material that will be free of dust, loose organic or inorganic material and particles that may be blown about by the helicopter. Any lighting used for nighttime operations shall be directed away from adjacent residences. c. d. e. f. g. Requirements for Rooftop Heliports. Rooftop heliport facilities shall also comply with the following standards. a. No roof openings shall be permitted within twenty-five (25) feet of the Touchdown Liftoff Area. Rooftop exits shall not be located within twenty-five (25) feet of the Touchdown Liftoff Area. Rooftop heliport facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the City Building and Fire Code requirements in addition to applicable State and Federal heliport design standards and regulations. b. c. Required Finding: A Conditional Use Permit may be approved only if the following finding is made: a. The heliport is in compliance with the requirements described in Subsections 2 and 3. Operational Requirements. a. Flight operations associated with private heliports shall only take place during the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm weekdays except for emergency medical service flights. The hours of operation for non-lighted facilities shall be limited to the hours between sunrise and sunset. The intermittent use of helicopters on Saturdays and Sundays and outside of specific operating hours may be allowed subject to an approved Temporary Use Permit. The Touchdown Liftoff Area shall remain free of free of dust, loose organic or inorganic material and particles that may be blown about by the helicopter. b. Periodic Review. A biennial monitoring report shall be submitted by the applicant. The monitoring report for each two year period shall be submitted within forty-five days of the end of each reporting period. The biennial report shall include data on the types of helicopters R:\D P\2002\O2-0478 Private HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc . . . . . . using the facility, hours of operation, performance standards, number of monthly flights and any other necessary data. All monitoring reports shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The modification or revocation of the conditional use permit shall comply with the provisions of Section 17.04.010.1. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends Section 17.34.010 by adding the following definitions: "Helicopter" means a rotary wing aircraft which depends for its support and motion in the air principally upon the lift generated by one or more power-driven rotors that rotate on a substantially vertical access. "Private Heliport" means a landing area used to take off or land private helicopters for the purpose of picking up and discharging passengers, cargo or medical emergency passengers and do not include fueling or service facilities. The use of the heliport shall be accessory and incidental to the primary use of the property. Private heliports do not include facilities for regularly scheduled commercial operations such as commuter passenger service. "Private Heliport for Hospital" means a landing are used to take off or land helicopters for the purpose of picking up and discharging medical emergency passengers. The use of the heliport shall be accessory and incidental to an existing hospital facility. "Touchdown Liftoff Area (TLOF)" means the area of the heliport where the helicopter lands on and takes off from." PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _day of June 2004. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\D P\2002\02-0476 prtvate HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc 10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the CityofTemecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 04-- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the - day of June, 2004, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the - day of June, 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\D P\2002\O2-Q478 Private HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc 11 . . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY R:\O P\2002\O2c0478 Private HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc 12 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Project Title Lead Agency Name and Address Contact Person and Phone Number Project Location Project Sponsor's Name and Address General Plan Designation Zoning Description of Project Surroundin Land Uses and Settin Other public agencies whose approval is re uired . R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Private Helipadllnitial Study.doc Environmental Checklist City of Temecula, in Southwest Riverside County. City of Temecula Not applicable Not applicable The proposed project is a text amendment to the Development Code (Title 17 of Municipal Code) that would establish specific development standards for private heliport facilities. Generally, the Amendment would make the following changes: Define Helicopter, LandingfTakeoff pattern, Private Heliport and Touchdown/Liftoff area; Create Supplemental Heliport Development Standards in Section 17.10 of the City Development Code applicable to all private heliports; Authorize private heliports in the Professional Office zone as a conditional use; Authorize private heliports for hospitals only as a conditional use in the Community Commercial (CC), Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC) and Service Commercial (SC) zones. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ,/ Hazards Noise Public Services Utilities and Service S stems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation Mandato Findin s of Si nificance None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: ,/ I find that the proposed project will result in no changes to the physical environment and is exempt ursuant to Section 15061 b 3 of the CEQA Guidelines. I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIV DECLARATION will be re ared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the ro'ect ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired, but it must anal ze onl the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are im osed u on the ro osed ro'ect, nothin further is re uired. fJtd!Ii¡ (? ~ \ Signature ' ;)¡¡ý1p/ q 2{yy:f- Date "7 fv\ð-. m~vJ c. ttlJ\Ytf1:.s Printed name c.I'., ðf- T~ç,()~ For . R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Private Helipadllnitial Study.doc 2 Land Use and Planning. Would the project: a. b. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Ph sicall divide an established communit ? Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect? Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communi conservation Ian? Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Inco orated No 1m ct ./ c. Comments: Less Than Significant 1m act ./ ./ No Impact. The project is applicable ity wide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: b. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of re lacement housin elsewhere? Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation lnco orated No 1m act c. Comments: Less Than Significant 1m act ./ ./ ./ No Impact. The project is applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? a. ii R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Private Helipadllnitial Study.doc 3 Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation tnco orated No 1m act' ./ Less Than Significant 1m act ./ ./ b. c. d. e. Iii iv ./ ./ ./ Seismic-related round failure, includin Ii uefaction? Landslides? Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil? Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral s readin ,subsidence, Ii uefaction or colla se? Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or ro ert ? Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ./ ./ ./ Comments: No Impact. The project is applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. 4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project? a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially S;gnificant Impact Potentially Signmcant Unless Mitigation Inco orated No Impact Less Than Signiticant ;mpact Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge re uirements? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which ermits have been ranted? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in floodin on- or off-site? Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of olluted runoff? Otherwise substantiall de rade water ualit? Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation ma? ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Pr;vate Helipadllnit;al Study.doc Place within a 10Q-year flood hazard area structures which would im ede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Comments: ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' No Impact. The project is applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. 5. a. b. c. e. AIR QUALITY. Would the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air uali Ian? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existin or ro'ected air ualit violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed uantitative thresholds for ozone recursors? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of eo Ie? Comments: Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Inco orated No 1m act Less Than Sign"icant 1m act ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' No Impact. The project is applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. A private heliport facility will serve to reduce automotive trips and associated air emissions. 6. TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC. Would the project? a. b. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or con estion at intersections? Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion mana ement a enc for desi nated roads or hi hwa s? Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a chan e in location that R:ID P\2002\02-0478 Private Helipadllnitiai Study.doc 5 Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation inco orated No 1m act Less Than Significant im act ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design features .¡' le.a., share curves, danaerous intersections)? e. Result in inadequate emeraencv access? .¡' f. Result in inadeauate parkina capacity? .¡' g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, .¡' bicycle racks? . Comments: No Impact. The project is applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. A private heliport facility will serve to reduce automotive trips and associated traffic congestion. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signiticant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco';;orafed Impact Impact a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in .¡' local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California .¡' Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, .¡' coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with .¡' established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nurserv sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or .¡' ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation .¡' Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments: No Impact. The project is applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be . undertaken upon application for a private heliport. R:\D P\2002\O2-0478 Private Hetipadllnitial Study,doc 6 a. b. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local eneral Ian, s ecific Ian or other land use Ian? Comments: Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Inco orated No 1m act Less Than Significant 1m act ./ ./ No Impact. The project is applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or dis osal of hazardous materials? Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- uarter mile of an existin or ro osed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to th-e public or the environment? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workin in the ro'ect area? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workin in the ro.ect area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation Ian? Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? R\D P\2002\02-Q478 Private Helipad~nitial Study_doc a. c. d. e. f. g. Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mffigation Inco orated No 1m act Less Than Significant 1m act ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ Comments: . 10. NOISE. Would the project result in? a. b. c. d. e. f. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or a licable standards of other a encies? Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive round borne vibration or roundborne noise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ro.ect? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ro'ect? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the ro'ect area to excessive noise levels? Comments: Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incor orated No 1m act Less Than Sign;¡¡cant 1m act ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ No Impact. The project is a Development Code Amendment applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have a substantial adverse physical impacts associates with the provisions of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Imoact Incoroorated Imoact Imoact a. Fire Drotection? ./ b. Police-protection? ./ c Schools? ./ d. Parks? ./ e Other Dublic facilities? ./ Comments: . No Impact. The proiect is a Development Code Amendment applicable citywide and is not site specific. An R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Private Helipad\lnitial Study.doc 8 environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. a. b. c. d- e. . UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Wouid the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the a licable Re ional Water Qualit Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or ex anded entitlements needed? Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Be served by a landfill with suflicient permitted capacity to accommodate the ro'ect's solid waste dis osal needs? Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and re ulations related to solid waste? Comments: Potentially Signifieant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mnigation Inco orated No 1m act Less Than Sign"ieant 1m act ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' ../ No Impact. The project is a Development Code Amendment applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. 13. AESTHETICS. Would the project? Potentially Potentially Sign",cant Unless Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sign"ican! Mitigation Sign"ieant No Imoact IncorDorated Imnact 1m act a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ,¡' b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building ,¡' within a state scenic hiahwav? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ,¡' aualitv of the site and its surroundinas? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the ../ area? 8comments: No Impact. The project is a Development Code Amendment applicable citywide and is not site specific- An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Private Helipadllnitial Study.doc 9 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Imnact Inco';;orated Imoact Imoact a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of ../ a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of ../ an archaeoloqical resource pursuant to Section 1506.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ../ resource or site or uniQue qeoloqic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred ../ outside of formal cemeteries? . Comments: No Impact. The project is a Development Code Amendment applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco';;orated linoact Imoact a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational ../ facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities ../ which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? . Comments: No Impact. The project is a Development Code Amendment applicable citywide and is not site specific. An environmental determination will be undertaken upon application for a private heliport. It is not anticipated that private heliport facilities will increase the use of or need for recreational facilities. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant In:=:~~d Significant No Impact Imoact Imoact a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate ../ a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate imDortant examples of the major periods of . R\D P\2002\02-047B Private Helipad\lnitial Study.doc 10 c. California histo or rehisto ? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current ro'ects, and the effects of robable future ro'ects? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directl or indirectl ? ý' ý' Comments: No Impact. The proposed amendment to the Municipal Code would create specific development standards and approval criteria for private heliports. Moreover, the amendment would authorize private heliports as a conditional use in the Professional Office (PO) zoning district and would authorize private heliports for hospitals with a conditional use permit within the Community Commercial (CC), Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC) and Service Commercial (SC) zones. The proposed amendments would not directly authorize an entitlement to construct any heliport facilities. The proposed changes to the Municipal Code will not directly have an effect on the physical environment as described in the questions contained in this Initial Environmental Study. When a specific application for a private heliport is filed with the City, a determination will be made at that time as to the type of environmental review that is required to comply with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. Therefore, this amendment to the Municipal Code is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. . EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, other CECA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. b. c. Earlier anal ses used. Identif earlier anal ses and state where the are available for review. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed b miti ation measures based on the earlier anal sis. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which the address site-s ecific conditions for the ro'ect. Comments: No earlier analysis has been utilized in association with this Initial Study. . R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Private Helipadllnitial Study,doc 11 . ATTACHMENT NO.4 . LIST OF JURISDICTIONS SURVEYED . R\D P\2002\02-Q478 Private HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc 13 _.'C .",'.~c=-'~':':":'z'" ""¡¡-""', L~",t::w~~,;:;.;, :"C' ',-, ,,:["C;¡,,:;:;" ,':fiiw~.--.., . . . JURISDICTION HELIPAD REGULATIONS CitY of Burbank No CitY of EI Sea undo Yes CitY of Fresno No CitY of Irvine No City of La Verne No CitY of Lake Forest Yes City of Lonq Beach No CitY of Los Anqeles Yes City of Oceanside Yes CitY of Pasadena No CitY of Sacramento Yes CitY of San Dieao Yes CitY of Torrance Yes CitY of Westlake Villaae No County of Oranae Yes Citv of Santa Ana Yes R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Private HelipadlSTAFFRPT PC.doc 14 . . ITEM #7 . . . . STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 16, 2004 Planning Application No. PA02-0478 (Conditional Use Permit / Development Plan) Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner 1. ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0478 (Conditional Use PermiVDevelopment Plan) per the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15332. 2. ADOPT a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0478 - A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF A PRIVATE ROOFTOP HELIPORT ON AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 42580 RIO NEDO, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. APN 909-290-029. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT/OWNER: Brad Adams, Sunstone Systems International Inc. PROPOSAL: An Appeal of the Planning Director's decision to approve Planning Application PA02-0478 a proposal for a 400 square-foot private rooftop heliport on an existing industrial building. 42580 Rio Nedo. LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Business Park (BP) EXISTING ZONING: Light Industrial (LI) North: Light Industrial (LI) South: Light Industrial (LI) East: Light Industrial (LI) West: Light Industrial (LI) SURROUNDING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: Industrial Building R:\Appeals\PA02-0478 Robinson Private Heliport Appea~Staff Report.doc 1 SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Industrial South: Industrial East: Industrial West: Industrial . BACKGROUND On October 9, 2003, the Planning Director approved PA 02-0478, a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct, establish and operate a 400 square-foot private heliport to be located on the roof of an existing industrial building. Subsequently on October 24, 2003 an appeal of the Planning Director's decision was filed by Councilman Jeff Stone. ANALYSIS The justification for the appeal indicated that the proposed rooftop heliport raises many important land use issues which should be considered by the City Council including public safety, land use compatibility and noise. Councilman Stone was concerned that no criteria currently exists within the Development Code to specifically analyze these types of facilities. In an effort to address these issues, staff has drafted supplemental development standards specifically for private heliport facilities which would be incorporated into the Development Code. This Development Code Amendment was previously presented to the Commission at tonight's meeting as a separate item. Staff has reviewed the proposed heliport project against the draft supplemental standards and has determined that the project would fully conform to these provisions. Therefore, should the Commission support the proposed Development Code Amendment, staff recommends that the appeal be denied subject to an added project condition stating that: . "Approval of the project is contingent upon City Council adoption of a Development Code Amendment establishing specific standards and regulations for private heliport facilities and a finding that the project is in conformance with those adopted standards and regulations." RECOMMENDATION Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Director's decision to approve PA02-0478 subject to one additional condition of approval as stated above. ATTACHMENTS 1. PC Resolution 2004-_- Blue Page 3 Exhibit A - Revised Conditions of Approval (Conditional Use Permit) Exhibit B - Revised Conditions of Approval (Development Plan) Appeal Application - Blue Page 6 2. 3. Director's Hearing Staff Report dated October 9, 2003 - Blue Page 7 . 4. Director's Hearing Minutes of October 9, 2003 - Blue Page 8 R\AppealsIPAO2-0478 Robinson Private Heliport Appea~Staff Report.doc 2 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- R:\Appeals\PA02-0478 Robinson Private Heliport Appea~Staff Report.doc 3 :.:~: .;;:¡-;.iC:.¿"','<'>\y;""," """"'. ~" ,,",~' .,,"-" .'.~"':"';'~._< .'<i.d-";!..-=":'~"""",;,,,"C, . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0478 - A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A PRIVATE ROOFTOP HELIPORT ON AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 42580 RIO NEDO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. APN 909-290-029. WHEREAS, Sunstone Systems International, filed Planning Application No. PA02-0478, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; and WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA02-0478 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; and WHEREAS, the application was processed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the Planning Director held a duly noticed public hearing on October 9, 2003 to consider the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Director considered Planning Application No. PA02-0478 on October 9, 2003 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Director's Hearing and after due consideration of the staff report and public testimony, the Planning Director approved Planning Application No. 02-0478; and WHEREAS, an appeal of the Planning Director's decision to deny Planning Application PA01-0601 was properly filed by Councilman Jeff Stone on October 24,2003; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the appeal, staff report, Planning Director Minutes, and the complete public record at a duly noticed public hearing on June 16, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the Planning Director's findings were consistent with the requirements of the City's General Plan, Development Code, and all other applicable state and local laws; and WHEREAS, the evidence and grounds presented in the appeal will be fully addressed with a subsequent Development Code Amendment which establishes development standards and approval criteria for private heliports of which the proposed project must fully conform with; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: R:\Appeals\PA02-Q478 Robinson Private Heliport Appea~Staff Report.doc 9 Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. . Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in denying the appeal of the Planning Director's decision to approve Planning Application No. 02-0478 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.010 and Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: Conditional Use Permit (17.04.010) A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code The proposal, a private rooftop heliport facility, is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan including the Land Use and Circulation Elements. Land Use Element Goal 5 promotes '~ land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages alternative modes of transportation". Circulation Element Goal 6 promotes "Safe and efficient alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City. In addition, the proposes facility conforms with all applicable Light Industrial (LI) development standards identified in the Development Code including, but not limited to height and setback requirements. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of use proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). . B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The project site is surrounded by industrial uses. The exterior noise generated by the proposed heliport falls within acceptable levels for an industrial area. The facility, as conditioned, will not adversely affect surrounding uses. Moreover, the helicopter flight path will not encroach into residential areas. C. The site of this proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use without affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the applicable development standards of the City Development Code and has found that the project meets or exceeds all of the standards. D. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Staff has reviewed the proposed heliport facility and has found that as conditioned, the facility will in no way be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Federal Aviation Administration, Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, Fire Department and Building and Safety Department. . R:\Appeals\PAO2-0478 Robinson Private Heliport Appea~Staff Report.doc 10 . . . E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Director. This application has been brought before the Planning Director at a public hearing where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Planning Director renders a decision- Development Plan (17.05.010) A The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal, a private rooftop heliport facility, is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan including the Land Use and Circulation Elements. Land Use Element Goal 5 promotes '¡<I land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages alternative modes of transportation". Circulation Element Goal 6 promotes "Safe and efficient alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City- Moreover, the proposed facility conforms with all applicable Light Industrial (LI) development standards identified in the Development Code including, but not limited to height and setback requirements. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of use proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). B. The overall development of the helipad facility is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed heliport facility has been reviewed and conditioned to comply with applicable Federal, Stafe and local requirements including, but not limited to the uniform building and fire codes. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0478 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines in accordance with Class 32, Section 15332. Whereas no further environmental review is required for the proposed project Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Planning Application No. PA02-0478 denying the appeal of the Planning Director's decision to approve a private rooftop heliport on an existing industrial building located at 42580 Rio Nedo. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibits A & B. R:\AppealsIPA02-0476 Robinson Private Heiiport Appea~Staff Report.doc 11 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 16th day of June, 2004. John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary {SEAL} STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of June, 2004 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\AppealsIPA02-0476 Robinson Private Heliport Appeai\Staff Report.doc 12 . . . . . . EXHIBIT A REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) R\AppealsIPA02-0478 Robinson Private Heliport Appea~Staff Report.doc 4 "-"",~15iIíIì~ "~ "~~ h'" ".',+_é"""FF,#i",.'",," . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA02-0478 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit to operate a 400 square foot private rooftop helipad facility for use during daylight hours on an existing industrial building. The subject property is located at 42580 Rio Nedo. Development Impact Fee: N/A Approval Date: October 9, 2003 Expiration Date: October 9, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. Approval of the project is contingent upon City Council adoption of a Development Code Amendment establishing specific standards and regulations for private heliport facilities and a finding that the project is in conformance with those adopted standards and regulations. 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action- The R,\D NOO2\O2-0478 Private HelipadlRevised CoA's.doc City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. . 4. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 5. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three, one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 6. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 7. 8- The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. 9. The helipad facility shall only be operated during daylight hours. . In accordance with Section 21661.5. of the State Aeronautics Act, the approval of this Conditional Use Permit is pending subject to review and approval of the City Council. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. 10. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name . R,\D 1'12002\02-0478 Private HetipadIRevised CoA's.doc . . . EXHIBIT B REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) R\AppealsIPA02-0478 Robinson Private. Heliport Appeal\Staff Report.doc 5 ~';";¡;:¡;¡;;':;;;";'7J,.~""",,,,-~ ,u:."" ..,~."", -. . '¡,~",'h';';'._"~'~"".;;':"'1.-'.'>~,,=:c;""'" ".:";".~'~~"':'-~""">-,...".. . . . EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA02-0478 A Development Plan to construct a 400 square foot private rooftop helipad facility to be used during daylight hours on an existing industrial building. The subject property is located at 42580 Rio Nedo. Development Impact Fee: N/A Project Description: Approval Date: October 9, 2003 Expiration Date: October 9, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements 1. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition. to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 2. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date: otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three, one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 3. 4. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan, contained on file with the Planning Department. RID f'\2002\02-0478 Private HelipadIRevised CoA's.doc 5. 6. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. . This Development Plan may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.05.010 of the City's Development Code. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as to not shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. (If revisions or additional lighting is proposed). Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. All buildings and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). . Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 12. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 13. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of building construction. 14. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards and any block walls, if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 15. Show all building setbacks. 16. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73. for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays . RID 1'\2002\02-0478 Private Helipad\Revised CoA's.doc . FIRE DEPARTMENT 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. . 23. . Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy. use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall maintain an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches around entire existing building. (CFC 902.2.2.1). During remodeling and/or addition construction ALL FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS will be maintained in working order and up to their original design and performance specifications. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4). Provide an 80 BC fire extinguisher on the roof near the helipad. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105). The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and Fire Departments an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the City, should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operations introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) 24. A building permit will be required for this improvement. All requirements of CFC Article 24, as well as all other applicable codes shall be addressed and complied with during the plan check process. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. 25. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name R:ID 1'\2002\02-0478 Private HelipadlRevised CoA's.doc . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 APPEAL APPLICATION R:\AppealsIPA02-0478 Robinson Private Heliport Appea~Staff Report.doc 6 ~:._,~-,~~;:.!.!'-."-~_..;¡¡¡"",. _..,,- . I - .,=" co:-:.",!""r. )'~ -:-'--~-' -"............íif:i¡j:""&;:-::;'~>""..".:;¿ Date StamR ¡~Œ LG Œ u \~ Œ~ìl IUD OCT 2 4 2003 ¡J!J 'I:!y '." City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive. Temecula. CA 92590 . Mailing Address: P,O. Box 9033 . Temecula, CA 92589-9033 (909) 694-6400. FAX (909) 694-6477 APPEAL Original Case Number(s) PA02-0478 A. PURPOSE The purpose of the appeal procedure is to provide a method of recourse for persons aggrieved by or dissatisfied with an action taken by an administrative agency of the City in the administration or enforcement of any provisions of the Development Code. . B. FILING REQUIREMENTS 1. Development Application. 2. Appeal Form. 3. Filing Fee. C. NOTICE OF APPEAL - TIME LIMIT A notice of an appeal by any individual who is aggrieved by or dissatisfied with a decision made by him or in his behalf, or with any action, order, requirement, decision or determination shall not be acted upon unless filed within fifteen (15) calendar days after service of written notice of the decision. D. NOTICE OF APPEAL - CONTENTS Appealing the decision of: Director of Planning - October 9, 2003 (Specify Director of Planning or Planning Commission AND Action Date) Specify exactly what is being appealed: of this Project Appeal of the Planning Director's Approval . 1:\DEBBIElappeaLdoc Reason or justification to support the appeal. Appellant must submit with this appeal each issue, which the appellant alleges, was wrongly determined together with every agreement and a copy of every item of evidence. (Attach separate sheet of paper if necessary). . This application raises many important land use issues for the City which the City Council, as a Body, should address. These issues include: public safety, land use compatibility and noise. I think the Council needs to have a full report from the Planning staff on these issues. This report should contain factual information from the State Aeronautics Division and the County Airport Land Use Commission. Desired action to be taken: The entire City Council should review and consider all the issues and provide direction to staff. . ~f~ pp II S~ture ad, 2l(, 2003 Date In the event any Notice of Appeal applicant fails to answer any information set forth above, then the request will be returned to the appellant, with a statement of the deficiencies. The appellant shall be allowed five 5 calendar da s in which to refile the notice of a eal. . R:\DEBBIElappeal.doc 2 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 DIRECTOR'S HEARING STAFF REPORT DATED OCTOBER 9, 2003 R:\AppealsIPA02-0478 Robinson Private Heiiport AppeallStaff Report,doc 7 ;:-;::::. ;'¡;;;;:;¡¡¡¡jf'¡;¡~""-':-¿: . :':::,.~ ,- -,--' ""--"- '>:':-"";,:~~ ~"-,,< '.:~. '._", "'-:;"""-'~,"':;¡:¡;'";i'-,Cþ,;...~-....,,.-~:... I) . " JO . . . STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING October 9, 2003 Planning Application No. PA02-0478 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan) Prepared by: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Director: 1. Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA03-0166 pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: DH RESOLUTION NO. 2003-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0478, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMITAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 400 SQUARE FOOT PRIVATE HELIPAD FOR USE DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS ON THE ROOF OF AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 42580 RIO NEDO FURTHER KNOWN AS APN: 909-290-029 APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Robinson Helicopter Company PROPOSAL: To construct and operate a private rooftop helipad LOCATION: 42580 Rio Nedo in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California EXISTING ZONING: Light Industrial (L-I) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Industrial (L-I) South: Industrial (L-I) East: Industrial (L-I) West: Industrial (L-I) R:\D P\2002\O2-0478 Private Heljpad\DH staffreportdoc GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Light Industrial (L-I) Industrial Building . North: Industrial South: Industrial East: Industrial West: Industrial PROJECT DESCRIPTION The property owner is proposing to construct and operate a 400 square foot helipad facility on the roof of an approximately 16,000 square foot existing industrial building located at 42580 Rio Nedo within the West Side Business Park. Section 17.08.030 of the Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for helipads. The property owner is proposing to fly a Robinson R44 helicopter to and from the helipad approximately twelve times a month. Flights may occur seven days a week and are restricted to daylight hours. The facility will be utilized for corporate use only and will not be open to the public. A Northeast/Southwest approach and departure path will be utilized by the helicopter. The proposed four hundred square-foot helipad will be square in shape and will be constructed at the northeast corner of the building. The pad will be constructed of extruded aluminum and will be secured to the roof. Moreover, the height of the helipad will be level with the adjoining roof parapet walls- In addition, an eight-foot tall stairwell doghouse will be constructed west of the pad that will serve as the primary access to and from the roof. . ENVIRONMENTAL This project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Section 15332 (In-fill) because the project is surrounded by existing development in an urban environment, the project site is less than 5 acres in area and no significant environmental impacts will result. ANALYSIS The most potentially significant environmental impact associated with the proposed helipad is noise. The applicant has provided noise impact data associated with the specific helicopter to be utilized in association with the facility (Robinson R44). The noise data indicates that as the helicopter is sitting on the helipad increasing power to take off, 44.5 dB CNEL are generated on the ground within a 125 foot radius of the helipad. This number decreases to 38.5 dB CNEL at a radius of 250 feet and 32.5 dB CNEL at a radius of 500 feet. The moment of take off is the loudest period during the duration of the flight. As the helicopter ascends off the helipad. the decibels heard on the ground decrease rapidly. The subject property is located within an existing industrial park with a Light Industrial (LI) zoning designation. Temecula General Plan Figure 8-1 provides a Land Use Compatibility Matrix that identifies compatibility and acceptable limits of exterior noise for various land uses. The matrix indicates that a maximum 70 dB CNEL is normally acceptable within a business park consisting of wholesale, industrial and manufacturing uses. The noise generated from the helicopter is anticipated to be well below that threshold. Therefore, noise impacts on industrial . R:ID P\2002\O2-<J478 Private HelipadlDH stafheport.doc . . . properties in the vicinity of the project site are not considered significant. Staff has also determined that the proposed helipad complies with all applicable development standards identified in the Development Code. The proposed private helipad facility has also been reviewed and approved by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission subject to several Conditions of Approval. Moreover, the proposed helicopter approach and landing paths have been reviewed and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) subject to several conditions. Based on the above information, staff believes that required findings can be made for the approval of the proposed helipad facility. RECOMMENDATION Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Director approve Planning Application No. PA02- 0478 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan) to construct and operate a private helipad based upon the following findings and the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS: Conditional Use Permit (17.04.010) 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code 2. The proposal, a private rooftop helipad facility, is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan including the Land Use and Circulation Elements. Land Use Element Goal 5 promotes "A land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages alternative modes of transportation". Circulation Element Goal 6 promotes "Safe and efficient alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City. In addition, the proposes facility conforms with all applicable Light Industrial (LI) development standards identified in the Development Code including, but not limited to height and setback requirements- The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of use proposed- The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The project site is surrounded by industrial uses. The exterior noise generated by the proposed helipad falls within acceptable levels for an industrial area. The facility, as conditioned, will not adversely affect surrounding uses, Moreover, the helicopter flight path will not encroach into residential areas. 3. The site of this proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use without affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. R,ID P\2002\O2-0478 Private He];padIDH 'taffreport.doc Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the applicable development standards of the City Development Code and has found that the project meets or exceeds all of the standards. 4. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Staff has reviewed the proposed helipad facility and has found that as conditioned, the facility will in no way be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Federal Aviation Administration, Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, Fire Department and Building and Safety Department. 5. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Director. This application has been brought before the Planning Director at a public hearing where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Planning Director renders a decision. Development Plan (17.05.010) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal, a private rooftop helipad facility, is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan including the Land Use and Circulation Elements. Land Use Element Goal 5 promotes uA land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages alternative modes of transportation". Circulation Element Goal 6 promotes "Safe and efficient alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City. Moreover, the facility has been reviewed and conditionally approved by the Federal Aviation Administration, Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, Fire Department and Building and Safety. The proposed helipad, as conditioned, is consistent with all applicable development standards and policies identified in the City Development Code including all standards listed for the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district 2. The overall development of the helipad facility is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed helipad facility has been reviewed and conditioned to comply with applicable Federal, State and local requirements including, but not limited to the uniform building and fire codes- R,ID P\2002\O2-û478 Private HelipadlDH staffreport.doc . . . . . . Attachments 1. DH Resolution Conditional Use Permit Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 2. DH Resolution Development Plan Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval R:ID P\2002\O2-0478 Private HelipadlDH staffreport.doc . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 DH RESOLUTION NO. 2003-- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT R:\D P\2002102-{)478 Private HelipadlDH staffreportdoo ,"> >~-:_':;~;;;':;:'.¡";;",-,,-:_>-" -""" ~._--~-""'~-~,-- >--: --=-i_,»",_-~.-¿,;,":~>,,-.,::j2-;;;:=-,":- . . . DH RESOLUTION NO. 2003-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0478, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A 400 SQUARE FOOT PRIVATE HELIPAD FOR USE DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS ON THE ROOF OF AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 42580 RIO NEDO FURTHER KNOWN AS APN: 909-290-029 WHEREAS, Robinson Helicopter Company filed Planning Application No. PA02-0478, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA02-0478 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Director, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PAO2-0478 on October 9, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Director's Hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Director approved Planning Application No. PA02- 0478 subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA02-0478 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; NOW, THEREFORE, THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Director, in approving Planning Application No. PAO2-0478 (Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; The proposal, a private rooftop helipad facility, is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan including the Land Use and Circulation Elements. Land Use Element Goal 5 promotes "A land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages alternative modes of transportation". Circulation Element Goal 6 promotes .Safe and efficient alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City. Moreover, the proposed facility conforms with all applicable Light Industrial (LI) development standards identified in the Development Code including, but not limited to height and setback requirements. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of use proposed. The project. as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). R:ID P\2002\O2-O478 Private Hel;padIDH staffæport.doc . B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures; The project site is surrounded by industrial uses. The exterior noise generated by the proposed helipad falls within acceptable levels for an industrial area. The facility, as conditioned, will not adversely affect surrounding uses. Moreover, the helicopter flight path will not encroach into residential areas. C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the Planning Commission, or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the applicable development standards of the City Development Code and has found that the project meets or exceeds all of the standards. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; Staff has reviewed the proposed helipad facility and has found that as conditioned, the facility will in no way be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Federal Aviation Administration, Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, Fire Department and Building and Safety Department. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Director. . This application has been brought before the Planning Director at a public hearing where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Planning Director renders a decision. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and adopted by the Director of Planning in accordance with Class 32, Section 15332 of CEQA Guidelines. Whereas, no further environmental review if required for the proposed project. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Director of Planning hereby approves Planning Application No.PA02-0478 (Conditional Use Permit) for a private helipad located at 42580 Rio Nedo, further known as APN: 909-290-029, subject to the conditions of approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any other conditions that may be deemed necessary. . R,\D P\2002\02-0478 Private HelipadIDH ,taffreport.doc . . . Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Director of Planning this 9th day of October 2003. Don Hazen, Principal Planner I, Adria McClanahan, Secretary of the Temecula Director's Hearing, do hereby certify that DH Resolution No. 2003-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Director of Planning of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of October 2003. Adria McClanahan, Secretary R:\D P\2002\02-0478 Private HelipadlDH staffreport.doc . . . EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R\D P\2002\O2-0478 Private HelipadIDH staffreport.doc to . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA02-0478 (Conditional Use Permit) A Conditional Use Permit to operate a 400 square foot private rooftop helipad facility for use during daylight hours on an existing industrial building. The subject property is located at 42580 Rio Nedo. Development Impact Fee: N/A Project Description: Approval Date: October 9, 2003 Expiration Date: October 9, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty- eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims. actions, awards. judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency. appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. R:\D P\2002\O2-0478 Private Helipad\DH staffreport.doc 11 3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion. or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. . 4. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three, one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 5. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 6. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 7. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. 8. 9. The helipad facility shall only be operated during daylight hours. In accordance with Section 21661.5. of the State Aeronautics Act, the approval of this Conditional Use Permit is pending subject to review and approval of the City Council. 10- A maximum 70 dB CNEL exterior noise level shall be generated at the subject property boundaries. . By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Name . R:\D P\2002102-Q478 Private Hel;padlDH staffreport.doc 12 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 DH RESOLUTION NO. 2003-- DEVELOPMENT PLAN RID P\2002\O2-0478 Private HeiipadIDH staffreport,doc 13 ---":",,;;.-,,,,%."4.-1-"#11-;'; --'-'L'.".' ~::-'-'4"-'c&~'~' 'ok, .c; ',- . . . DH RESOLUTION NO. 2003-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0478, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT A 400 SQUARE FOOT PRIVATE HELIPAD TO BE USED DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS ON THE ROOF OF AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 42580 RIO NEDO FURTHER KNOWN AS APN: 909-290-029 WHEREAS, Robinson Helicopter Company filed Planning Application No. PA02-0478, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA02-0478 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Director, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA02-0478 on October 9, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Director's Hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Director approved Planning Application No. PA02- 0478 subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA02-0478 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; NOW, THEREFORE, THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. FindinGs. The Planning Director, in approving Planning Application No. PA02-0478 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the Genera Plan for Temecula and with all the applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city; The proposal, a private rooftop helipad facility, is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan including the Land Use and Circulation elements. Land Use Element Goal 5 promotes "A land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages alternative modes of transportation". Circulation Element Goal 6 promotes .Safe and efficient alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City. Moreover, the facility has been reviewed and conditionally approved by the Federal Aviation Administration, Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, Fire Department and Building and Safety. The proposed helipad, as conditioned, is consistent with all applicable development R:\D P\2002\O2-0478 Private HelipadlDH staffrepúrt.doc 14 standards and policies identified in the City Development Code including all standards reflected for the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district. . B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public, health, safety and general welfare. The proposed helipad facility has been reviewed and conditioned to comply with applicable Federal, State and local requirements including, but not limited to the uniform building and fire codes. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and adopted by the Director of Planning in accordance with Class 32, Section 15332 of CEQA Guidelines. Whereas, no further environmental review is required for the proposed project. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Director of Planning hereby approves Planning Application No.PA02-0478 (Development Plan) for the construction of a private rooftop helipad located at 42580 Rio Nedo, further known as APN: 909-290-029, subject to the conditions of approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any other conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Director of Planning this 9th day of October 2003. . Don Hazen, Principal Planner I, Adria McClanahan, Secretary of the Temecula Director's Hearing, do hereby certify that DH Resolution No. 2003-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Director of Planning of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of Octobert 2003. Adria McClanahan, Secretary . R:ID P\2002\O2-0478 Private HelipadlDH '13ff.eport.doc 15 . . . EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\D P\2002\O2-0478 Private He1ipadlDH staffreport.do<: '-::':;';;'-~;;;'_-__h _._,-,'0"""""-" 16 "~"--~:k£":"""-Á=" , i:"...::.'-""..f , -T"-"":""',':i",,:';;~;-:;;;:':---'" . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA02-0478 (Development Plan) A Development Plan to construct a 400 square foot private rooftop helipad facility to be used during daylight hours on an existing industrial building. The subject property is located at 42580 Rio Nedo. Development Impact Fee: N/A Project Description: Approval Date: October 9, 2003 Expiration Date: October 9,2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements 1. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack. set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 2. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 3. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three, one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 4. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan, contained on file with the Planning Department. KID P\2002\02-0478 Private HehpadIDH staffreport.doc 17 5. 6. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. This Development Plan may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.05.010 of the City's Development Code. . BUILDING DEPARTMENT 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as to not shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. (If revisions or additional lighting is proposed). Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction worlc All buildings and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). . Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of building construction. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards and any block walls, if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. Show all building setbacks. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays . R,\D P\2002\O2-0478 Private Helipad\DH ,<afhepart.doc 18 . FIRE DEPARTMENT 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. . 23. 24. 25. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall maintain an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches around entire existing building. (CFC 902.2.2.1)- During remodeling and/or addition construction ALL FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS will be maintained in working order and up to their original design and performance specifications. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4). Provide an 80 BC fire extinguisher on the roof near the helipad. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105). The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and Fire Departments an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the City, should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operations introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) A building permit will be required for this improvement. All requirements of CFC Article 24, as well as all other applicable codes shall be addressed and complied with during the plan check process. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Name . R:ID P\2002\02-0478 Private HelipadlDH staffreport.doc 19 . (/) :Eo.. wo J-J- (/)(/) >- (/)~ wJ: zw oJ- J-~ (/» 2- ::Ja: (/)0.. . . . . . Ex f\-M f L I'õ \-ì E 1..3.-f' F>.- \.:> " N "un "tOne "ystems Hellpaa; lemeCUla, L;alitornía - E'roject . J,~~f~~.;~::~:~~ ~=::~::::~~ '~ .... - -----.----., 1..--Joso ì'230A¡)pr~~RtlF 1 HU:. 0", TRU:' rRE~ is> i ~i ,.. i. rRE¡! -9 ~( :~: . 'REt :<¡(I\ _. ~;t' ¿I,-- L..~ Key Approach/Depart Path Safety Area FATO - 58' x 58' , . ,ne <.-ana ( Project Includes: ¡ i:xhii)it . One 20 x 20 foot extr~d~~'u~~~f~:cure and level with the pa~apet wall. '--.--..-. - Project Construction . One 8-toot-high dog house surrounding the stairs which will be built from the Mezzanine to the root. y . ;~I \.LI f] -. In ¡ :~ IlD "1"' ,7: vJ ".,,~ R VAl. E. 6~Ä\.WAI ~ :'OLI[:~ ShìTE S,T~jMF'JNC SIGN . . . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.4 DIRECTOR'S HEARING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9, 2003 R:\AppealsIPA02-0478 Robinson Private Heliport Appea~Staff Report.doc 8 ~::ê.~'X:;.b"'k""'-""'." ~J..r .."".~",--¡, o'.C¿'i;:;;:';~ .!! -"~";: ... .;.~..,. "..;<,,;;=Æ:',,:~~,c..:.;;;o~;~:.::' . . . .~ .? MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DIRECTOR OF PLANNING October 9, 2003 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Director's Hearing was called to order on Thursday, October 9, 2003, at 1 :30 PM, in the Main Conference Room, located at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Principal Planner Donald Hazen presiding. Also present were, Associate Planner Matt Harris, and Minute Clerk, Cynthia Lariccia Item No.1: Plannina Application No. PA02-0478 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to desian, construct. and operate a private rooftop helipad facility on an existina industrial buildinQ, located at 42580 Rio Nedo. Principal Planner Donald Hazen called the meeting to order at 1 :32 PM. Planner presented his analysis and recommendations for the project, highlighting special conditions such as: operating during daylight hours only, northeasVsouthwest approach and departure, noise generated from ascension and landing not to exceed 70 decibels, and that the State Aeronautics Division requires application be reviewed by the City Council before State approval is given. Planner also stated that the original applicant, Robinson Helicopter Company, relinquished its role as applicant and that the new applicant, property owner Brad Adams, concurs with all conditions and is agreeable to become applicant. Principal Planner Donald Hazen questioned whether this facility would serve as a permanent hangar space for the helicopter. Representative of applicant responded no. Principal Planner Donald Hazen opened Public Hearing at 1 :37 PM. Ms. Jen McSkimming of Robinson Helicopter Company, acting as agent for the applicant, gave an overview of the business owner's need for the helipad as well as their company's assistance in the application process and to promote wise heliport usage. Principal Planner Donald Hazen requested a summary of the acoustical study that was prepared on this application. Applicant's agent responded. Principal Planner Donald Hazen asked applicant's agent about an estimate of the number of flights per day. Applicant stated owner would probably use these services a couple of times per week at most. No further requests to speak were presented. Principal Planner Donald Hazen closed the Public Hearing portion of the Agenda. P:\PLANNING\PI RHEAR\M I NUTES\2003\ 1 0-09-03 mlnutes.doc 1 . ~.? Principal Planner Donald Hazen approved PA02-0478 with the modification clarifying that the use is for operation during daylight hours only. Should applicant want to put up lighting for evening hour use some time in the future, he would have to return for another hearing for that use. There being no further business meeting was adjourned at 1 :45 PM. P:\PLANNINGIDI RHEAR\MINUTES\2003\ 1 0-09-03 mlnutes.doc 2 . . . . ITEM #8 . . . . . Date of Meeting: Prepared by: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 16, 2004 Don Hazen Title: Principal Planner File Number Application Type: CUP/Development Plan PA03-0535 Project Description: Recommendation: (Check One) CECA: (Check One) A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct an 18,808 square foot, three-story office/retail building within the Old Town Specific Plan Area, located on the south side of Fifth Street, approximately 120 feet west of Front Street. ¡:g¡ Approve with Conditions 0 Deny 0 Continue for Redesign 0 Continue to: 0 Recommend Approval with Conditions 0 Recommend Denial ¡:g¡ Categorically Exempt Previous EIR 0 Negative Declaration 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Applicant: Completion Date: Lon Bike, Architectural Team 3 May 10, 2004 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: August 10, 2004 Service Commercial General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Specific Plan 5 (Old Town Temecula Specific Plan) R\C U P\2003\03-0535 Penfold Piaza\STAFF REPORTdoc Site/Surrounding Land Use: . Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Retail Retail Retail Creek/Single Family Residences Lot Area: 19,204 square feet Total Floor Area/Ratio: -97 Landscape Area/Coverage: 17.04% Parking Required/Provided: 0 Required/ 4 Provided BACKGROUND SUMMARY 1:8:11. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. 02- Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, and the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. . ANALYSIS The proposed project is a request for a three-story mixed use, office/retail building totaling 18,808 square feet. The Old Town Specific Plan requires a Conditional Use Permit for all mixed use buildings. The current Old Town Specific Plan requires City Council approval of buildings exceeding two-stories in height and the project has been conditioned accordingly. The proposed mixed use building is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Old Town Specific Plan and will implement the goal to "create a high quality and distinct Western image and a functional, vibrant and aesthetically pleasing Old Town for Temecula" (SP, pg. 11-9). The site plan is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan and Development Code. Vehicular access to the site will be provided from Fifth Street via a shared driveway with the abutting parcels to the east along Front Street, and a public alley extending along the southerly property line. Pedestrian access will be provided from Fifth Street and the alley, with an 8-foot wide covered arcade and rear sidewalk encircling the building. The westerly half of the alley will be closed off to vehicular traffic and improved by the applicant as a pedestrian plaza with landscaping. street furniture, and decorative paving. A final alley construction detail will be required as a condition of building permit issuance. The building design conforms to the Old Town Specific Plan "Old Town Western" architectural style guidelines. The three-story building will be approximately 40-feet tall and feature styling details such as vertical cedar siding, corrugated metal roofs, wood trimmed windows, wood picket railings, wooden column posts, and decorative building light fixtures. The applicant has . RIC U Pl2003103-0535 Penfold PbzalSTAFF REPORTdoc also incorporated staff's request to add windows and storefronts along the rear side facing the creek; add a storefront entrance and shed roof dormers over the lower windows along the alley to help maintain the pedestrian scale of the alley; and to increase the projection of the center "pop-ouf' feature on the east elevation to encompass the walkway. The building setback, windows, and storefront entries along the rear will also enable that side of the building to functionally interface with the planned pedestrian walkway along the creek. . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ~1. (or) 01. (or) 01. . In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Consistent with General Plan EIR) The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved (Negative Declaration) (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). An initial study has been prepared and indicates that the project will have the following potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as conditions of approval. Based on the following mitigations, staff recommends adoption of the mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. CONCLUSION/R ECOMM EN DATION The proposed project as conditioned is consistent with the current and proposed amended Old Town Specific Plan. Three story buildings in the Tourist Retail Core are recommended in the proposed amended Specific Plan, and the project is contingent upon City Council approval of the SP amendment or this particular request (whichever occurs first). On April 12, 2004, the Old Town Local Review Board reviewed the application and unanimously recommended Planning Commission approval. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit (17.04.010E) 1. . The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. The proposal for a mixed use office/retail complex is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Service Commercial and the goals and objectives of the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan. RolC U P\2003103-0535 Penfold Pla",ISTAFF REPORTdoc 2. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. . The proposed conditional use is compatible with the adjacent land uses and will serve to enhance the business vitality of Old Town and promote the functional viability of the alleyways and creek walkway as pedestrian linkages to other areas Old Town. 3. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The project is consistent with the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and provides for vehicular and pedestrian access to the site, 4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The office/retail building will help promote the economic development and visitor appeal of Old Town. All City deparlments have reviewed the application and concerns have been addressed and incorporated as conditions of approval. 5. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Director of Planning. . This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing where members of the public have had an opporlunity to be heard on this matter before the Planning Commission renders their decision. Development Plan (17.05.010F) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies of the Service Commercial General Plan land use designation of the General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed architecture is consistent with the Architectural requirements as stated in the Old Town Specific Plan. The proposed architectural is consistent with the 'Western Style" architecture described in the Specific Plan, and will promote pedestrian circulation on the side streets off of Front Street. . R,\C U 1'12003\03-0535 Penfold Plaza\STAFFREPORT.doc . . . ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 6 2. PC Resolution 2004-- - Blue Page 7 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 3. Minutes Excerpt, Old Town Local Review Board Meeting of April 12, 2004 - Blue Page 8. RoIC U 1'12003103-0535 Penfold PlazalSTAFF REPORTdoc . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS RolC U 1'\2003103-0535 Penfold PlazalSTAFFREPORTdoc "-,,, " ~,," "-""'-"""<-"¡;;:;F~:;-,,": ,"~ -"okY':""",,;!>d!. -~-- CU'- - ;-,,-~ ",¡¡¡¡¡í""'-w_- OJ." :-"",'-'~-=o~:",¡¡,;~""""";'-"'\¡;¡.:;:--~,i~_::--- . . . ~ ¡,iI,1 !I ""OJ I '" "'00"31 mmH1SllO2> !]~~@ìJ~fiiI\ID ~:»~,¡¡,¡¡@ /ìJ~W .!!,~~ U@.!!,!) ~~~~.!!, I:I\~~ '" ::' 0 z . .. .. ,. " , , Ii :! ¡! ' " H n:" ..,' ;,". ¡illiil!ill!¡idl¡¡! 1!¡lli !! ! ¡ ! ! ! ! ¡ ¡ ! ! ¡ ¡ !! !¡ ! ¡ ! ! ¡ !!! - -.. -.... - - .... 0"" .qO"U ;¡ H ~¡ ~ j ; ¡! :, ¡¡ !;'~; II il! ¡i . g '" g !!1m!:" 'ill I'll I ,.I.'.i.,,¡'¡'II, I '¡'I' 'III " I ¡¡- t;~ ~g I: 3 I ~¡H!!i 3 ,,8e; ,0E vv N '" w :=; z ~ '¡! w '" , .:1Ih . ¡, .. HIm ; !I!' mml ¡ i¡j ,;:;,;¡ ¡, 1¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡;~ ¡¡ !!¡ 1"§!'¡ ': .:¡ IIi!!!! ¡¡ m I- i I.JJ : W R; I : 0:: Lf) I : 1-" I crl U!: I , I u: I .. ¡ I- :; /+Øl~ ""',.J_L~::>::/ I ~@ (O e<Ðe, @, ~(;ifv1, -.m-,,',,'..,m...-- 0007.::1 8 ,,8e;,0E vv N ,66'¡vl _m.._._....".-----'---- (j ¡ ¡ ::¡ ¡¡' ~ !z ~ " . w "- '" U '" ~ -' ~ jj¡'¡ II ""~:~:i:l~:;"'" ¡ ;IWii III '" w Ö z ¡ , 1 !!; ! 0 ¡ HH L ; ,¡¡ ¡ê !¡¡¡¡un H mm¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ " - - - ", '" , , VJ -' , , « , ¡ ::5 z ¡ ", f- 0 - , ~ ~ I . 0 i is 5! ¡ ! ' ,¡ I ¡ I ¡ I '" 0 i . "I Ii! ¡ I; 5 H;!!/¡;¡¡¡¡;;/II;,¡;; œææææææææ朜œœœœœœœ - - - --... - - -- ;¡- t;~ ~~ ~ @§¡ 0 ~ VJ W :Ie VJ z ¡ Z 0 , :;: ~ ' ~ ~, : ; : . w '! 0' . ~ I Ii ; WI, I ¡ ED ED ED ED ED ED ftra.'."" '-'-. I. :; I>-J' ,: ";- ", ~: " , : ill é ¡ :), ~ Z 0 ~ ¡;-, --' W '-' Z ~ " '" I :< 0 Z ED EÐ Z 0 § oj ~ 0 f- ~ W . ~ it! !I {) -""'" ., ...... - ""OJll,,'nnn<3J ~~O@~~~';Hl~;;~~~ /~~\y UW )IW@.!!,íJ ¡j]¡j]W~,J\, /M!¡j]~ ¡lil;1111111 ~ ¡ II; H '~ z ! ¡¡liil:!i!:I!! V> <!. : , ~ ~ ¡ ! ! , ! i '" ~" .! I - , ¡ïiJi¡d¡!i:i!l¡ilil:;¡i Wœææææææææææææææææææ . . 6 I- <t ~ :~ ~ ~~ ~ c;ß ~ :c ~ w ~ ¡;¡ Z 5 j ~ ~ . ~ ~ : ¡ ; : ~ ! i ; , ¡ W ,I." ED ED ED ED ED ED , rt~if(I>1i- t'è ~ 0 --' :J <D F :J S .-----.---. 6 I- <t 1:; --' W '-' Z '3 :J <D :;; ~ I~.....I 'liWIIII @ Iii 1: ""~:~i~~~;~"'" ¡ ¡WiI!! g¡;~ ~~ D ~~ 1; . æO ~ ~ L ¡ ¡¡ iLl ':;; ,. '! Wi 0 I .. ~ (j~ Ctî ¡ ~ c;: I 6! « . ; '_n_" l ;111 lU-e L 1 1 I "'" ) @ 1..1 =: . ~H¡nl l~ U¡¡¡¡:I ","O~"'J "'o"'m mmH1\2LO2> !H!~@IIUIii@ ;¡¡:))ll~~@ /110\\7 Ur¡) Ar¡)@U ;¡¡;¡¡r¡)IiI.JI. /jj,\;¡¡iìj ii Ii I, I! " " g- I: ~ '" ~ @'?) . ~ ~ iili n'! (j 1 11 I" !~--¡=¡-- z « ¡¡' . ¡ 0 ! is , u , ~ ;¡ ~ ~ I U ;>¡ , . I~.I : I t ~ . [~ ' ,,' .., ~',~,:~;;~;'" ,!,I'!'I rill \) jj¡,j!! ""~::'!:i::¡l"'" ¡ t'l'i'i! ¡'ii ~ õ IT~'" ~~ ß ~~ :;; ~ r ffi .. if> ¡':' L î ~ 11 d ¡in (j~ cr cr ($1 ¡ I I z . ." r -< _j"I'I," 1~-i"I"1 "!"I ~ @--tn='~ ~ c--------, =[ -@¡.is , : : , I ô ¡;' . : : I í" ~ 0 ~ :: . ! := ; ~ ~ ~ i ___un l : - Ie c, w ¡~~: .~ c,; ~ - : ~~ ; " =."...'.. -< I " "L::^::J I ' '1- l h-" . w . , '1 ' , " ~ ~ . 'I ¡ L-------~i ' - ~: ~: i ~ c_-------------B. W d . I . , ~¡¡ . z6' ; I L : 'I"" --. ~~ ~~ I 1= Jl '~-1 i=1 J ciJ ~= I ~::.: "",03]l"'VlnJ~JJ ~I¡I¡I~IIII!I ~ ¡';"¡':I:-_:';'~! ':;,;. ~~~@~~J~:~;;;i:~~owu~ ~ .... \oJ c - ~ 1. !, I' !, I' !, i,,! . "'"' " /h\\¡j]~ ~ ~ :~ [!ßi) ~~ ~ ~ ~Q ~ ~ . ! ¡ illi:/ii! I!II iJi ----H-_--_--- t l I" I -n-r; ~ I II ; ~ -.' í ;:¿ :! I ; i:' -J. ' u =-+ ~ .1 ~ I ., (j~ (t¡ ¡ Ii ;¡ ¡¡' . , , ~ @ 1.:_1 :: . ~jiJ¡~ ~ !i t--~ ., L~ """OJI'" '""",! mmmZlOZ> :I¡IIIIIIII ~ II! ¡! ~Mß(Q 'illliIiJli! ~~O;J;J(Q)/'1I~\iJH1êI U@U :ID:ID1êI[}J.!!. bUM ¡~ ;!n ¡;¡ ",. ,-"-" mm! :¡¡;¡:~ 0 ~ '" ~ ~ z '" w > ~ ,Lli~ IV~" I~~L...=, +------' :';;,:::~:':" ----+ N 11 !; i~~ " ': 11 II " " "i ... !III ¡!¡¡ .. :: .. " z c ~ d @ @ @, @S ~ Q IÞ= Q ~ @, ~ @ Q !!fiìJ [iJ!!J d Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ c z ~ ~ z c ~ , ! 1 ! i ¡ '~=~\ -, , '-:::'::j ~ u z ~ ~ z w w ~ ge I~ ~ " ~ 0> c z : ¡¡ ¡; n II II , , ~ ¡ '" ¡II !!: : , .! 1 " .' " : ;"õ! ..,"" Li l¡~.ii I ~ . ,~-- , I." I ~ ~ ."':.." .,., '" ~ ~ c z ~ cD ! II : -~ , , ~ ~ ~ w ~ ¡! H ¡! ,: , , ! : i !i i ~ ~ ~ c z ~ ~ ~ ~ u w u z 0 u v= v=. " ~ z 0 ~ ~ > w z ~ ~ 0 a ~ ~ > w w w '" z ~ ~ 0 z w . ~,j,j¡¡ ~U¡¡¡:: ~,I,.,!¡ ~I: ¡; . ' ' - _1:1, ,. , , ~i I . . . """O""""""'" 133m "LS """ ~~~@"I~IfO~ ~:J~êJêJ@ /"IOW US! A8!@'!!'(\j ~~s!~.!!. tìí\~~ , , ~ ¡ ! ~~,!i!:!' ~ ;;; c '" ~ ¡[¡IIIIIIII ~ ¡ ¡!! ¡ ~~ ~~ ~ '" ~ @.§J " ~ I! : i¡ i < ~ ¡ , ~.!: 11 !!i,' 'I, ¡ - ! 11,1 ~ ¡ ~¡¡; ~. +\~! ¡¡¡; I ~ '0 ~ 00 I ~ ~ ~ ;¡: ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 -~U~è § ~ - m ~ u ~ ~ " ~ " . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 PC RESOLUTION 2004-- R:IC U 1'\2003103-0535 Penfold PlazalSTAFF REPORT.doc ~"':":: ;:,b::;~,:';¡;~'-',_-~, ,"":::.. _.............."":,--~,,, .."... ----.-.-. ',,¿#I,¡"~~~': -~.;;;;":-" . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0535, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT AN 18,808 SQUARE FOOT 3-STORY OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FIFTH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 120 FEET WEST OF FRONT STREET; KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 922-035-033,017, AND 019. WHEREAS, Architectural Team 3 filed Planning Application No. PA03-0535 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 12, 2004, at a duly noticed meeting as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff an interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter, and at the conclusion of the meeting, the Board unanimously recommended Planning Commission approval; . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission. at a regular meeting. considered the Application on June 16. 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. FindinQs (Conditional Use Permit) The Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required by Sections Section 17.04.010E of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. . The proposal for a mixed use office/retail complex is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Service Commercial and the goals and objectives of the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan. R.IC U 1'\2003103-0535 Penfold PlazaIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc I B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. . The proposed conditional use is compatible with the adjacent land uses and will serve to enhance the business vitality of Old Town and promote the functional viability of the alleyways and creek walkway as pedestrian linkages to other areas Old Town. C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The project is consistent with the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and provides for vehicular and pedestrian access to the site. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The office/retail building will help promote the economic development and visitor appeal of Old Town. All City departments have reviewed the application and concerns have been addressed and incorporated as conditions of approval. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. . This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Planning Commission renders their decision. Section 3. Findinas (Development Plan) The Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required by Sections Section 17.05.01 OF of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies of the Service Commercial General Plan land use designation of the General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed architecture is consistent with the Architectural requirements as stated in the Old Town Specific Plan- The proposed architectural is consistent with the 'Western Style" architecture described in the Specific Plan, and will promote pedestrian circulation on the side streets off of Front Street. . R:IC U P\2003103-O535 Penfold PlazalPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 2 . . . Section 4. Environmental Compliance. The project is consistent with the land use assumptions of the General Plan EIR, the project will have no significant environmental impacts, and has been found to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Section 5. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct an 18,808 square foot three-story office building within the Old Town Specific Plan Area, located on the south side of Fifth Street, approximately 120 feet west of Front Street with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 161hday of June 2004. John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of June 2004, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:IC U P\2003103-0535 Penfold PlazalPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R\C U 1'12003\03-0535 Penfold Pia",IPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 4 :- :--<:_':>;--:~-'<l1i>~-=~-- --<--"""":"-- :_~-"",,~---,,- - -,.- --~~i.~ ---~""-~~--.- . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA03-0535 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct an 18,808 square foot, three-story office/retail building within the Old Town Specific Plan Area, located on the south side of Fifth Street, approximately 120 feet west of Front Street DIF Category: MSHCP Category: Service Commercial/Office Commercial Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-035-033,017,019 June 16, 2004 Approval Date: Expiration Date: June 16, 2006 (Development Plan) June 16, 2007 (Conditional Use Permit) PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents- R\C U 1'\2003\03-0535 Penfold Pla",\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 4 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. . Final approval of this development plan is contingent upon City Council approval of the proposed building height of 40 feet (top of parapet) or approval of a Specific Plan amendment which permits such a structure. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D (Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevation), G (Floor Plan), and H (Landscape Plan) contained on file with the Planning Department. . Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 10. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the surrounding parapet wall. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. 11. All downspouts shall be internalized. 12. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease- The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the determination is not an . 13. R,\C U 1'12003\03.0535 Penfold PlazalPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 5 . . . 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. A separate permit shall be required for any window awnings. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 19. 20. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 21. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 23. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Planning Director and City Engineer, an alley construction detail plan showing all intended plantings, paving, lighting, and street furniture for the alley abutting the south property line. 24. 25. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially to the approved Exhibit "P', or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: R,IC U P\2oo3\03-0535 Penfold PlazalPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 6 26. 27. 28. 29- 30- 31. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program- All utilities and light poles shall be shown and labeled on the landscape plans and appropriate screening shall be provided. A three-foot (3.0') clear zone shall be provided around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. . a. b. c. d. e. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. The Planning Director shall approve the Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. The building construction plans shall include details for all trash enclosures for the project, which shall consist of masonry walls and metal or wood doors, a trellis structure over the top of the enclosure, a concrete floor and a concrete stress pad to reduce pavement damage from disposal trucks. . The construction plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange". Prior to Release of Power The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. 32. Prior to release of power, all site improvements including but not limited to parking areas, striping, and alley improvements shall be installed. 33. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 34. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by the Planning Director. All signage shall comply with the approved sign program. . R\C U 1'\2003\03-0535 Penfold PlazalPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 7 . . . DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS General Requirements 35. 36. 37. 38. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. All improvement and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: rolled curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approach Storm drain facilities, and Sewer and domestic water systems b. c. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 39. A copy of the grading, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit. 40. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work within their right-of-way. 41. The site is located within the limits of the Murrieta Creek Master Drainage Plan (MDP). The proposed alignment for Murrieta Creek of the MDP is along the western boundary of the site. Although construction of the facility is not necessary at this time, the right-of- way for the facility should be dedicated to the public prior t the issuance of permit. The developer shall submit to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) the preliminary title reports, plats and legal descriptions for all right-of- way to be conveyed to the District and secure that right-of-way to the satisfaction of the District. 42. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 43. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. R:IC U P\2003103-0535 Penfold PlazaIPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 8 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. . A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NO I) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works e- Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau . The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off- site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 51. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 52. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone AE. This project shall comply with Chapter 15. Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. . R:\C U P\2003\03-0535 Penfold PlazaIPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 9 . Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 53. 54. . 55. 56. . Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards for Old Town subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of T emecula Standard No. 207 A. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401 and 402. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. b. c. d. e. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve 5th Street (Local Road Standards for Old Town - 60' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, colored concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 57. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 58. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer. and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 59. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. 60- The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 61. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. R:IC U P\2003103-O535 Penfoid PlazalPC RESOLUTION AND CQA.doc 10 Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy . 62. 63. 64. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a- Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District Department of Public Works c. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT 65. 66. 67. 68. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1- The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) . The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 69. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) . 70. Prior to building final. all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or R,IC U 1'\2003103-0535 Penfold Plaza\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc II . 71. 72. 73. 74. . . any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s)- Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 75. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 76. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 77. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 78. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 79. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser door. (CFC 902.4) R,IC U P\2003103-0535 Penfold PlazalPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 12 80. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. . Special Conditions 81. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. COMMUNITY SERVICES General Conditions 82. 83. 84. All landscaping, pedestrian walkway, fencing and on-site lighting within this development shall be maintained by the property owner or a private maintenance association. The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure area. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 85. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. . BUILDING AND SAFETY 86. 87. 88. 89. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. . R:\C U P\2003\O3.QS3S Penfold Plaza\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 14 . 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. . 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. . Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,1998) Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. Show all building setbacks. R:\C U P\2003\O3-0535 Penfoid PlazaIPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 15 Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all of the Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to the Planning Commission approval. Date Applicant's Signature Applicant's Printed Name R:\C U P\2003\O3-0535 Penfold PlazalPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 16 . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 . MINUTES EXCERPT OLTRB MEETING APRIL 12, 2004 . R\C U 1'\2003\03-0535 Penfold PlazalSTAFFREPORTdoc ~.::'::~:~;';;;';~1f"dt""'o~"", L"L~~,"'--~ ~- " 'o!;¿", :",-oi'-"';¡ìí"'" -- - .- . MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOCAL REVIEW BOARD APRIL 12, 2004 CALL TO ORDER The Old Town Temecula Local Review Board convened in a regular meeting at 9:00 a.m., on Monday, April 12, 2004, in the Main Conference Room, of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL Present: Board Members Allen, Blair, Moore, and Chairman Harker Absent: Haserot. Also Present: Director of Planning Ubnoske Director of Redevelopment Meyer Assistant Planner Fisk Management Analyst Hillberg Code Enforcement Officer Cole Principal Planner Hazen Minute Clerk Childs . PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aoenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve agenda of April 12, 2004. r MOTION: Board Member Moore moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Board Member Blair seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Board Member Haserot who was absent. ~ Plannina Application No. PA03-0535 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a 24.650 square foot. three-storv commercial buildina and exceed the maximum heiaht limit of two stories on .32 acres, located on the south side of Fifth Street, approximately 120 feet west of Front Street. . Applicant: Architectural Team 3 23905 Clinton Keith Rd., Suite 114 Box 225 Wildomar, CA 92592 R:/OldTownILRB/Minutesl041204 Principal Planner Hazen presented a staff report (as per agenda material), highlighting the following: . That the applicant proposed to construct a 24,650 square foot commercial building on a vacant parcel directly to the rear of the "Penfold Building"; and that both parcels will be under the same ownership and will share access and parking; . That since the building will be proposing a third-story, the City Council will need to give the final approval as required by the Old Town Specific Plan (SP); . That the proposed building will carry much of the same architectural styles as the existing Penfold Building to the east; That cedar siding, corrugated roof elements, true divided wood windows, wood balcony railings, and rough sewn balcony support columns will be incorporated; . That the plan would be to create a multi-tenant retail space on the ground floor, office space on the second floor, and a restaurant and support offices on the third floor; That there will be landscaped planter boxes proposed along the alley; and that a conditioned alley detail plan will be submitted with the construction plans; That covered walkways will surround the building and permit pedestrian access to all sides of the building; That the architectural design of the building is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan and replicates a western style architecture; That the proposed building will be all wood, no stucco. The Board expressed excitement with the proposal and relayed that the building will be an asset to Old Town. MOTION: Board Member Moore moved to approve staff's recommendation. Board Member Blair seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Board Member Haserot who was absent. 3 Planninq Application No. PA03-0447 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct an 11,000 square foot mixed use buildina to include retail uses and a restaurant on the qround floor and office uses on the second floor on 1.93 acres, located at the northeast corner of Old Town Front Street and Fourth Street. Applicant: Craig Way SPREI/MEI 31630 Railroad Canyon Road, #9] Canyon Lake, CA 92587 Staff: Stuart Fisk, Associate Planner R:/OldT ownlLRB/Minutes/041204 . . . . ITEM #9 . . . . . STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: June 16, 2004 Prepared by: David Hogan Title: Principal Planner File Number PA03-0158 Application Type: Specific Plan Amendment Project Description: Update of the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) A comprehensive amendment of the Old Town Specific Plan to update make a number of corrections within the Plan, provide additional design criteria for walls, fences, accessory structures, signage, public art, and outdoor dining areas, as well as make minor adjustments to some Pianning District boundaries. Recommendation: (Check One) D Approve with Conditions D Deny D Continue for Redesign D Continue to: IZI Recommend Approval to City Council D Recommend Denial CECA: (Check One) D Categorically Exempt (Class) IZI Recommend Approval of a Negative Declaration to the City Council 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR BACKGROUND SUMMARY The Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) was approved on February 14,1994 following the approval of the City's first General Plan on November 9, 1993. Since that time, there have been three minor amendments related to parking and signage. City Staff and the Old Town Local Review Board (OTLRB) began considering modifications to the Specific Plan in 2003. The result of this lengthy process is the comprehensive update to the Old Town Specific Plan that is being proposed for the Commission's consideration. A complete copy of the updated Old Town Specific Plan is contained in Attachment No.4. R~OTSP\PJan AmendmentsIPAO3.0158\StaffReport PCl.dot The update consists of both organization and format changes, as well as more substantive modifications. The primary content changes include modifications to the Land Use Plan, minor clean-up items to the zoning standards within the Plan, the establishment of additional guidelines for public art, outdoor dining areas, detached structures, fences, walls, awnings, pocket parks, vending machines, and signage, and the modification of the parking requirements in the Tourist Retail Core. The OTLRB considered these changes, and they are recommending that the Planning Commission approve the updated Old Town Specific Plan. Nine Local Review Board meetings were held between March 24, 2003 and June 14, 2004 to identify potential amendments, develop additional standards, and review the draft of the Specific Plan. The overall structure of the Old Town Specific Plan is being modified to remove a number of obsolete items as well as consolidate the historic preservation requirements into a single section. The current and proposed organizations are shown below. Section Current Specific Plan Content Proposed Specific Plan Content I. Introduction to the Specific Plan Introduction to the Specific Plan II. Discussion on the process of Goals, Polices and Objectives, along developing the original Specific Plan, with the infrastructure plans and summary of infrastructure plans, and discussions the Goals, Policies, and Objectives III. Zoning standards, Historic preservation Zoning standards requirements, and Old Town Local Review Board provisions IV. Architecture and design guidelines Architecture and design guidelines V. Suggested implementation program, Historic preservation requirements Old Town Local Review Board and Old Town Local Review Board procedures, and infrastructure plans provisions Attachment No.5 contains a redline/strike out version of the current zoning standards from Section III of the Specific Plan However, because of the number of proposed changes, the organization of this Attachment is somewhat confusing. As a result, staff recommends that the Commission focus on what is being added and deleted rather than how it appears to be organized in this Attachment. The actual organization of Sections III and V in the Amended Specific Plan do not have this problem. Attachment No.6 contains the new material being included into the Design Guidelines (Section IV of the Specific Plan). R~OTSP\Plan Amendments\PAO3-0158\Staff Report PCI.dol . . . . . . Chanqes to the Land Use Map While the overall concept of the Old Town Specific Plan will not change, there are a number of changes being proposed to the Land Use Plan. The major changes focus on the expansion of the Tourist Retail Core Planning District. None of these changes undermine the integrity or goals of the Specific Plan. The specific Land Use Plan changes are as follows: 1. Merging the Community Commercial-Tourist Support Area (at the south end of Old Town) into the Tourist Retail Core Planning District. The Community Commercial Tourist Support District is being removed from the Old Town Specific Plan. 2. Expanding the Tourist Retail Core northward to include the shopping center immediately north of the Sixth Street Parking Lot The other changes being proposed for the Land Use Plan represent minor adjustments to better reflect the underlying conditions. The other minor proposed Land Use boundary changes include the following: 3. Adding the Union 76 Service Station at the southeast corner of Rancho California Road and Old Town Front Street into the Highway Tourist Planning Area in the Specific Plan. The site was originally excluded from the Plan because of a concern that a service station could not be constructed on the site if it was included within the Specific Plan. However, when the site was actually developed, it incorporated appropriate design components from the approved Specific Plan. As a result, considering that the service station was developed in conformance with the Plan, there is no reason to not include it within the OTSP. 4. Moving the boundary adjustment between the Highway Tourist Commercial and Community Commercial Planning Areas (across the street from the Museum) to shift two parcels fro the Highway Tourist to Community Commercial area. These two lots are oriented toward the core of Old Town, facing Sam Hicks Park, and have land uses that are more appropriately designated as Community Commercial designation. 5. A more accurate delineation of the Open Space Planning Area to match the actual future creek channel location. The original location of the Open Space District in the OTSP was largely a guess. This map change will provide a more accurate delineation which should improve the development review process. The proposed Land Use Plan is shown in Attachment No.7. An exhibit showing the current land Use Plan are shown in Attachment No.8. Permitted Use Matrix One of the most apparent changes to the Specific Plan is the clean up to the permitted use matrix. The original matrix had numerous repeat uses and was divided into a number of subcategories that often made it difficult to determine if a use was permitted or not. The proposed Plan Amendment consolidates these sub-lists into a single more consistent list using the format of the City's Development Code. In addition, staff is also proposing a number of minor changes to the list of possible uses. A description of the use changes is included in Attachment No.9. The totality of these changes is expected to make this part of the Specific Plan easier to use. R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPAO3-0158\StaffReport PC1.dot Zonina and Development Standards . Mixed Use Provisions. One of the goals of the original Specific Plan was encourage additional residential units in the Tourist Retail Core. These additional units were expected to assist in the revitalization of Old Town and the creation of a vibrant village center. However, the current Mixed Use Provisions are extremely restrictive and make it difficult to provide upper floor or rear lot area residential uses. The proposed amendment would make the provision of these accessory residential units easier. The proposed amendment would also bring future use development projects in Old Town into full compliance with the current General Plan's Village Center requirements as well as the Mixed Use provisions being considered as part of the Updated General Plan. The proposed amendment shifts the determination of the number of allowable units from a numeric criterion to a site design criteria. For example, a proposed mixed used development on a 50 foot wide and 150 foot deep lot would currently be limited to only 2 units. However, Staff and the Local Review Board feel that there is no reason why additional units could not be reasonably provided with the proper site design. As a result, the proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan would replace the Medium Density numeric criteria for mixed use projects with the requirement for a conditional use permit. This would allow for maximum flexibility of the site design while retaining City control over the design of future mixed use projects. Parking Requirements. When the Old Town Specific Plan was adopted, the Plan referenced the citywide parking standards in Chapter 17.24 of the Development Code. Shortly thereafter, it became apparent that maintaining the current parking standard and requiring that buildings in Old Town be oriented toward the sidewalk were substantially in conflict. As a result, the City Council approved the elimination of the onsite parking requirement in the Tourist Retail Core. These proposed amendments would continue that opportunity while retaining the onsite parking requirement for the more automobile-oriented commercial and residential districts. Within the Tourist Retail Core and Tourist Serving Residential Districts, onsite parking would be required only for hotels, motels, and banks and financial institutions that are more than 1,250 square feet is size. The provision of on site parking for mixed use residence is recommended but not required. . Building Height. The current Specific Plan limits buildings to two stories and provides a mechanism for the City Council to approve taller structures. The proposed amendments would increase this allowable building height in the Tourist Retail Core to three stories. The City Council would retain the authority to approve higher structures if appropriate in context and location. Temporary Uses. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would also increase the number of allowable outdoor sales event from 2 to four events per year within the Tourist Retail Core District. Given the character and nature of the Old Town, the additional events are expected to generate additional activity and excitement into the core of Old Town. This is an increase over the citywide standard of two events per year. . R~OTSP\Plan Amendmen¡,;IPAO3-0158\Staff Report PCI.dot . . . The final set of changes to the zoning standards is the eliminated the previous development incentives. The original incentive provisions, increasing building height, reducing the onsite parking standard. and increasing the number of allowable units were not achieving their desired goal and have already been incorporated into the design standards within the Specific Plan. A complete addition/deletion copy of the Zoning, Design Standards and Historic Preservation requirements are contained in Attachment No.5. Additional Desian Standards Over the years, the Old Town Local Review Board has often struggled with the need for additional design standards covering a variety of accessory structures, fences and awnings. In response to this, staff and the OTLRB developed supplemental standards for these items and are proposing that they be incorporated into Chapter IV of the Old Town Specific Plan. Along with these new discussions, new photographs and exhibits are also being proposed throughout the Design Guidelines. Some of the major items being included in this Amendment include the following. Public Art. The addition of standards for where public art should be allowed and what types of themes are most appropriate for Old Town. This is located in Section IV.-G. Outdoor Dining and Sidewalk Furniture and Umbrellas. A new section including the description of period-appropriate materials, colors and designs for street side furnishing. This is located in Section IV.-H. Pocket Parks. This amended language provides standards for potential pedestrian spaces in the form of pocket parks and mid-block paseos. Desired construction materials for these are also identified. This is located in Section IV.-C. Advertising and Sign Design Guidelines. These new amendments prohibit the use of phone numbers on signs, as well as clarify trademark color standards, and specify the use of multiple colors on pictorial artwork. This is located in Section IV.-J. The new material added to Section IV is contained in Attachment No 6. Historic Preservation Reauirements The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will locate all the historic preservation and Old Town Local Review Board provisions into a single Chapter of the Plan. The OTLRB's authority, mission, or composition is not being changed. The primary changes include the updating and simplification of the review procedure, a specific requirement to maintain designated historic structures, and the inclusion of a specific penalty in the event a designated historic structure is destroyed or removed without permission. The specific provisions would allow the City to require the complete and total replacement of an illegally removed historic structure. If this was not done, the City Council would be authorized the issuance of any building or use permit for a period up to seven years. R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPA03-0158\Staff Report PC1.dot 8. Existing Land Use Plan - Blue Page 21 9. Summary of Proposed Permitted Use Matrix Changes - Blue Page 22 Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 24 . 10. . . R\\OTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPAO3-0\58\StaffReport Pel.dot . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION To evaluate the possible impacts associated with these changes to the Old Town Specific Plan, staff prepared an Initial Environmental Study. Using the original approved Specific Plan as the baseline condition; the analysis identified two impact areas that have the potential to see some change in terms of the environmental impacts. The two areas are parking and noise. The elimination of the on site parking requirement for much of the commercial core has a potential to cause parking-related impacts in Old Town. However, to address this concern, the Specific Plan retains the requirement for centralized City parking lots to provide the necessary parking. To date, the City has constructed one lot at the north end of the Tourist Retail Core area and acquired another parking lot at the south end of the Tourist Retail Core. In addition, the City has recently acquired a number of parcels in the middle portion of the Tourist Retail Core and has plans of providing additional parking in this location. With the provisions to allow additional residential uses in conjunction with office and retail uses within the Tourist Retail Core, there is a possibility of an additional increment of noise impacts because of this area's proximity to Interstate 15. However, current building code requirements set interior noise requirements that will minimize most of these future noise impacts. The possible parking and noise impacts are considered to be less than significant. As a result, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that a Negative Declaration be adopted. A copy of the Initial Environmental Study in contained in Attachment No.1 O. . CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDA TION The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan are expected to further revitalize the Old Town area and facilitate new development. The format and organization changes should make the Plan easier to use. Staff and the Old Town Local Review Board recommend that the Planning Commission recommend the approval of these Amendments to the Specific Plan to the City Council. A copy of the proposed Planning Commission Resolution is contained in Attachment No.1. The proposed City Council Resolution and Ordinance referenced in the attached Commission Resolution are contained in Attachment Nos. 2 and 3, respectively. ATTACHMENTS 1. PC Resolution 2004 - _-Blue PagE>. 8 Proposed City Council Resolution - Blue Page 11 2. 3. Proposed City Council Ordinance - Blue Page 14 4. Proposed Draft Old Town Specific Plan - Blue Page 17 5. Redline/Strikeout of Section 111- Zoning Standards - Blue Page 18 New Material Added to the Design Guidelines - Blue Page 19 . 6. 7. Proposed Specific Plan Land Use Map - Blue Page 20 R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIP AO3-0 I 58\Staff Repnrt PC I.dot . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PC RESOLUTION 2004-- RIIOTSPIPlan AmendmentslPAO3-0158lStaffReport PCl.dot ~'ž--"-é;.:Ç~;:'ÌiÎ.ci:::'^--""->-- "~~~,=.,~ --"..- =.;,:- '-Z'. - --",..---"'- é.',-- .--"""""'~- _~";""'~_T<:;:!':",,¿::- . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 03-0518) WHEREAS, on November 9,1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan to guide the revitalization of Old Town Temecula; and WHEREAS, the Old Town Specific Plan created the Old Town Local Review Board to assist in the implementation of the Plan and to periodically suggest ways to improve the Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Old Town Local Review Board identified a number of areas where supplemental design guidelines could be necessary and worked with City Staff to develop detailed amendments to the Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered these proposed amendments on June 17,2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recommendation to the City Council. The Planning Commission for the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council approve a resolution and ordinance amending the Old Town Specific Plan, substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibits A and B, and approve a Negative Declaration for this project. Section 2. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 16th day of June 2004. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPAO3-0I 58\Staff Repnrt PCLda! STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of June 2004, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R~OTSP\Ptan Amendments\PA03-0158\StaffReport PC1.dot 10 . . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 PROPOSED CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION RIIOTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPAO3-0158\StaffReport Pel.dot II r.-:;",: ~"';;CEf'~~ ",---""'_M.' . ~"'.,.::;¡.,;",~...;,,¡¡¡~~. .. ~.~.. .c..,;':;,~F~';'::';:.....: . . . RESOLUTION NO. 04-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 03-0518) WHEREAS, on November 9,1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; and WHEREAS, on February 8,1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan to guide the revitalization of Old Town Temecula; and WHEREAS, the Old Town Specific Plan created the Old Town Local Review Board to assist in the implementation of the Plan and to periodically suggest ways to improve the Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Old Town Local Review Board identified a number of areas where supplemental design guidelines could be necessary and worked with City Staff to develop detailed amendments to the Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered these proposed amendments on June 17, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, the City Council considered these proposed amendments on - -, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council: Section 1. Approval of the Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby approves the amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan as contained in Exhibit A. Section 2. Environmental Determination. A detailed Initial Environmental Study (IES) checklist was prepared for this project. The analysis identified no significant impacts on the environment. The IES and Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was circulated for public review between May 24, 2004 and June 17, 2004. As a result, the City Council hereby adopts a Negative Declaration for this project. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this- day of ,2004. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPA03-0158\StaffReport PC1.dot 12 ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA) ) ) ss I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula. California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 04-- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the - day of , 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R~OTSPlPlan Amendmen"\P AO3-0158\Staff Report PCldo! 13 . . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 PROPOSED CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE RIIOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPAO3-0158lStaffReport PCI,dot r::,;:~:~~-,¿,~ e.":,,','ê-' - c-;¡¡ 14 -:."~,,-,,,-:,~;M~-,. -, --"'._~';,'--",'_1'~"W"~~=;~',-- . . . ORDINANCE 04-- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE ZONING AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION STANDARDS FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 03-0518) WHEREAS, on November 9,1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 1994, the City Council of the City of T emecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan to guide the revitalization of Old Town Temecula; and WHEREAS, the Old Town Specific Plan created the Old Town Local Review Board to assist in the implementation of the Plan and to periodically suggest ways to improve the Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Old Town Local Review Board identified a number of areas where supplemental design guidelines could be necessary and worked with City Staff to develop detailed amendments to the Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered these proposed amendments on June 17, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, the City Council considered these proposed amendments on - -, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council: Section 1. Approval of the Zonina Standards. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby adopts the Zoning Standards for the Old Town Specific Plan that are located in Section III of the Old Town Specific Plan and contained in Exhibit A. Section 2. Approval of the Historic Preservation Reauirements. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby adopts the Historic Preservation Requirements for the Old Town Specific Plan that are located in Section V of the Old Town Specific Plan and contained in Exhibit B. Section 3. Environmental Determination. A detailed Initial Environmental Study (IES) checklist was prepared for the update of the Old Town Specific Plan. The analysis identified no significant impacts on the environment. The IES and Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was circulated for public review between May 24, 2004 and June 17, 2004. As a result, the City Council hereby adopts a Negative Declaration for this project. R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPAO3-0158\Staff Report Pel.dot 15 Section 4. Severabilitv. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. . Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.. Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this - day of ,2004. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk . [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA) ) ) ss I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 04-- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the - day of , 2004, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the - day of ,2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk . R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPA03.0158\StaffRepol1 PCI.dot 16 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.4 PROPOSED DRAFT OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentslP AO3-0 I 58\Staff ReportPCI.dot r2~ ~ ':::;;?i:X~'t~"- ,.. --.. 17 «; ."... ,._,,'J.~,;',:;;.. . PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN . JUNE 2004 . . . . Old Town Specific Plan Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN A. Background and History B. Authority for the Plan C. Organization for the Specific Plan II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES A. Introduction B. Overall Goal C. Goals, Objectives, and Policies 1. Community Design 2. Land Use/Economics 3. CirculationlParking 4. Murrieta Creek Infi-astructure Plans D. III. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Introduction B. Establishment of Land Use Districts and Map C. Land Use Regulations D. Site Development Standards E. Relationship of the Specific Plan to Other Codes F. Supplemental and Special Use Standards G. Sign Regulations H. General Provisions and Regulations IV. DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Purpose and Intent B. Architectural Style Guidelines C. Site Planning Guidelines D. Parking Lot Guidelines Old Town Specific Page I-I Page 1-3 Page 1-5 Page II-I Page II-I Page II-2 Page II-4 Page II-5 Page II- 7 Page II-8 Page III-I Page III-I Page III-4 Page III-IO Page m-B PageIII-14 Page III-24 Page III-29 Page IV-I Page IV-2 Page IV-25 Page IV-35 i - 1 IV. DESIGN GUIDELINES (CONTINUED) E. Landscape Guidelines F. Lighting Guidelines G. Public Art Guidelines H. Outdoor Dining! Sidewalk Furniture Guidelines I. Paving Material Guidelines J. Sign Design Guidelines K. Streetscape Guidelines Page IV-37 Page IV-40 Page IV-4I Page IV-45 Page IV-46 Page IV-47 Page IV-51 . V. OLD TOWN HISTORIC PRESERV A nON DISTRICT A. Purpose B. Establishment of the District C. D. E. F. G. H. Exhibit I-I Exhibit II-I Exhibit II-2 Exhibit 1I-3 Exhibit III-I Exhibit V-I Building Pennits and Prohibitions Old Town Local Review Board (OTLRB) Old Town Local Historic Register Certificate of Historic Appropriateness Care and Maintenance Page V-I Page V-I Page V-I Page V-2 Page V-3 Page V-6 Page V-8 Page V-9 . Additional Violation Provisions for Historic Structures List of Exhibits Study Area Map Page 1-4 Circulation Map Page II-9 Water Distribution System Map Page II-ll Wastewater Collection System Map Page II-I2 Page III-2 Land Use District Map Historic Structures Map Page V-5 . Old Town Specific ;-2 . . . I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN CONTENTS: A. Background and History B. Authority for the Plan C. Organization for the Specific Plan Page /-1 Page /-3 Page /-5 A. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY The site of Old Town Temecula, as we know it today, came into being generally in the 1880's with the arrival of the railroad and the moving of the post office to the present town's location. However, the area has a much earlier beginning dating back to the original village settled by the Shoshonean Indians around 900 AD. along the banks of the Temecula River. Our discussion of historical events begins somewhat later with the arrival of the first white visitors, Father Juan Narberto de Santiago and seven soldiers who traveled to the area from the Mission San Juan Capistrano in the early 1800's. In order to establish the Mission's agricultural area, a granary and chapel were established in 1818 which marked the first settlement in the area by the white man. Not long after, in 1830, John McGee built a general store near the Pauba Ranch Headquarters, further increasing the presence ofthe white man in the area. The Indians lived a quiet existence until 1847 when they clashed with the Californians in one of the bloodiest battles of the Mexican War. The "Temecula Massacre" as it is referred to by local historians changed the Indian's relationship with the area and generally paved the way for increased settlement. During the next 25 years, white settlers began to move into the area in increasing numbers, pushing the Indians off of the more desirable land and further into the foothills. In 1885, John Butterfield founded a mail and passenger stage coach route which had a regular stop in Temecula. With the addition of the stage coach, Temecula experienced its first development boom. A post office was built in 1859 on a site near John McGee's general store. The stage line was halted, however, in 1861 because of the Civil War. Some of the most important historic buildings in Old Town come ITom this t ¡me period. The Welty Building, built in I 897, served as a general store with rooms to rent. In 1908, this building was transfonned into the Ramona Inn, housing the Blind Pig Saloon on the ground floor and a boxing ring upstairs where the likes of Jack Dempsey and Jack Sharkey would train. Other key buildings ITom the late 1800s include the Hotel Temecula, Machado Store, the Old Town Jail, and the Temecula Mercantile building. With the continuing arrival of settlers also came an increasing concern about the Indians and a desire for their precious river oriented land. In 1876 a San Diego County Sheriffs posse came without warning and physically moved the Indians to a site not far ITom the present location ofthe Pechanga Indian Reservation. Old Town Specific Plan 1-1 The coming of the railroad to Temecula in 1882 marked another boom period in the City's history. Granite quarries became productive in the late 1880's and lasted until 1915. Thousands of tons of cut granite were shipped fÌ"om Temecula to fonn the front steps of the Riverside County courthouse, curbstones on Market Street in San Francisco, cemetery monuments, and hitching posts. Some of these curbs are still present in Temecula in fÌ"ont of the old Machado Store/Long Branch Saloon building, around the comer fÌ"om the Bank, as well as in fÌ"ont ofthe Temecula Hotel. The largest piece (15 tons) is in Sam Hicks Monument Park, on which are inscribed the names of the notable visitors to the Temecula Valley. These times brought prosperity to Temecula and the town grew steadily. Some of the town's more notable buildings were constructed during these times: the first school in 1890; Temecula Mercantile (Burnham Store) in 1902; First National Bank in 1912; and the Palomar Hotel in 1928, to mention a few. St. Catherine's Catholic Church was built in 1917 and was the first church building in Temecula. It continued to function as a church until 1980, when a new church was built to accommodate the growing congregation. Today, the old church has become the Chapel of Memories and has been relocated to Sam Hicks Monument Park Today, Old Town Temecula is but a part, albeit an important part, of this larger community. New development surrounds the historic town site and while many of its historic structures have been tom down or moved, others still remain as a reminder of what Temecula was, and more importantly, as an inspiration for what it can be in the future- The approval of the Old Town Temecula Historic Preservation District by the Riverside Board of Supervisors in October 1979 marked the first recognition that Old Town Temecula truly is a unique place with a historic character worth preserving and enhancing. Since that initial recognition, other steps have also been taken to help plan Old Town's future and preserve its historic buildings and character. The Temecula Community Plan Task Force (comprised of members from the Old Town Temecula Museum Historical Committee, Old Town Temecula Merchants Association, Temecula Town Association, and Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) prepared and submitted a plan for Old Town's revitalization in October 1988. While the plan was a "grass roots" effort, it did provide a valuable perspective into the existing concerns and potential solutions facing future growth and development in Old Town Temecula. The Committee's stated purpose of the plan was "..- to encourage and speed the development and refurbishment of Downtown Temecula as a commercial and tourist center." However, since the plan lacked any official status, implementation of the plan's recommendations was primarily the responsibility of the Committee's member organizations which had no authority and few funds to carry out the majority of identified programs. The committee's report did, however, lay important ground work for future actions by providing a comprehensive assessment of issues facing Old Town at that time. Old Town Specific Plan 1-2 . . . . . . With the preparation of Temecula's General Plan which began in early 1992, a renewed focus on the issues facing Old Town were established. Throughout the various elements of the General Plan (including Land Use, Circulation, Open Space, and Community Design) needs have been identified to preserve and revitalize Old Town. The primary policy recommendation that emerged from the General Plan program was the need to prepare a specific plan for Old Town. Acting on this recommendation, the Temecula City Council authorized preparation of the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan (OTSP) to provide a master plan for the Old Town area. The Old Town Specific Plan was prepared in 1992 and 1993 with the assistance of Urban Design Studio and the council-appointed Old Town Steering Committee. The Steering Committee members represented a wide-range of local business and resident interests. The community is indebted to the following individuals for their participation in this process: Helga Berger, Susan Bridges, Carlene Danielsen, Linda Fahey, Christina Grina, Bill Harker, Larry Markham, Peg Moore, La Verne Parker, Bonnie Reed, and Steve Sanders. The Old Town Specific Plan was approved by the City Council on February 8, 1994. The purpose of the Plan is to provide a comprehensive plan for land use, development regulations, design guidelines, vehicular circulation, parking, development incentives and other related actions aimed at implementing the goals and objectives set forth in the Plan. This document superseded all previous plans, ordinances, and similar documents related to properties within the Specific Plan area. The boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan is shown in Exhibit I-I. B. AUTHORITY FOR THE PLAN California Government Code Sections 65450 through 65457 provide the necessary authorization for the City of Temecula to prepare and adopt this Specific Plan. The Old Town Specific Plan is a regulatory plan which will serve as zoning law for. properties within the boundaries of the Plan as depicted in Exhibit I-I. All proposed development plans or agreements, tract or parcel maps, and any other development approvals must be consistent with this Specific Plan and with the General Plan. This includes the identification of the Old Town area as a Village Center under the General Plan. The Specific Plan may be amended to further the systematic implementation of the General Plan. Old Town Specific Plan 1-3 cula Specific Plan n Teme Old Tow Exhibit 1-1 Study Map Area ~ N 400 800 Feet , 'ectslol"'"""_'___o...,o,,, ol9b\kell""""oewpro¡ . . . C. ORGANIZATION OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN An abstract ofthe general contents of the Plan follows, arranged in order of appearance. I. Introduction - The introduction provides a short history and broad overview of the Plan. 2. Goals, Policies and Objectives. A ppropriate goals, 0 bjectives, and policies are outlined in this section. They are the reference points by which all provisions of the Plan should relate to. 3. Land Use Plan and Development Standards - The Land Use Plan section describes the major concepts that make up the essence of the Plan. These include the geographic division into land use districts and the purpose of each one. It covers the pennitted land uses, general provisions, site development standards, and sign controls. This section also contains regulations for special uses and activities such as sidewalk cafes, mixed use projects, vending carts, and bed and breakfast establishments. 4. Design Guidelines - The Design Guidelines section contains two types of design provisions. The first type is design guidelines which describe the architectural and siting provisions for private development. The second type is the provisions for the public streetscapes. 5. Old Town Historic Preservation District Ordinance. This section contains the Old Town Historic Preservation District Ordinance, the Old Town Historic Register, and the Old Town Local Review Board. Old Town Specific Plan 1-5 . . . II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES CONTENTS: A. Introduction B. Overall Goal C. Goals, Objectives, and Policies J. Community Design 2. Land Use/Economics 3. Circulation/Parking 4. Murrieta Creek Infrastructure Plans Page II-J Page II-J Page II-2 Page 11-4 Page 11-5 Page II-7 Page 11-8 D. A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Section is to articulate the community's ideas regarding the goals and objectives for the Old Town Specific Plan. Goals Goals are broad statements of purpose that define the community's and local govemment's hope for the future. They are general in nature and do not indicate when and how these goals are to be accomplished. Obiectives Objectives are statements of intent that generally guide future decisions in specific topic areas. Policies Policies are more specific statements of intent to deal with particular topics in a certain fashion. They begin to define the approach to achieve the Plan goals and objectives, and are the first step in the development of a solution and fonn the basis of development standards and zoning regulations. B. OVERALL GOAL The overall goal for the Old Town Specific Plan was developed by the Old Town Steering Committee in 1992, supported by the Planning Commission, and approved by the City Council. The overall goal is what the community wants Old Town Temecula to become and provides the overall direction for this area. The overall goal for Old Town is: To create a dynamic Old Town commercial and residential core that is attractive and of high quality, respectful of i ts historic buildings a nd unifying design t heme and providing an economically viable setting for a mixture of local and tourist commercial uses, administrative/professional and residential uses with safe, efficient circulation and access. Old Town Specific Plan 1I - 1 C. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES . In an effort to further define and prioritize this overall goal statement, the following Community Design, Land UseÆconomic, CirculationlParking, and Murrieta Creek goals, objectives, and policies are provided. 1. COMMUNITY DESIGN Goal To create a high quality and distinct "Western" image and a functional, vibrant and aesthetically pleasing Old Town for Temecula. Objectives Provide easy to follow rules and regulations for new development to complement and promote the "Old West" vision for the Old Town area. Revitalize existing building facades which do not add to the established architectural theme. Promote a clearly pedestrian atmosphere in the area bounded by First Street on the south, Sixth Street on the north, Murrieta Creek on the west, and Mercedes Avenue on the east. . Protect the grid street pattern in Old Town. specifically between First and Sixth Streets. Provide for the elimination or screening of visually objectionable views such as outdoor storage, utility cabinets, trash bins, roof-mounted equipment, blank side walls, recycling equipment, and loading areas through the implementation of design guidelines. Promote complimentary "n ative" landscape treatments throughout t he Old Town area to enhance storeuonts and the desired architectural theme. Enhance and promote the creation of enjoyable public spaces throughout Old Town through the use of street furniture, landscaping, public art, building design, and pedestrian orientation. Design vehicular entry points which provide a sense of arrival to Old Town; initiate the Old Town streetscape theme. Provide signs to guide tourists to important destinations. . Old Town Specific Plan 11-2 . . . Soften the urban character of streets, parking areas, pedestrian spaces, and walkways with wooden plank sidewalks. Streets should also appear less urban (asphalt). Policies Develop consistent streetscape and architectural palettes for the Old Town that help create a high quality historic image. Require compliance with the Design Guidelines for the Old Town Specific Plan in new development or the expansion or redevelopment of existing development. Discourage significant lot consolidations and very large single-user development greater than 50,000 square feet in Old Town and encourage smaller storefront, pedestrian oriented design. Utilize landscape materials that are clean, safe, wind resistant, drought tolerant, and native species whenever possible. Infonnal landscape fonns should be utilized on the major thoroughfares to emphasize the "unplanned" appearance of a rustic early California settlement. Consider developing incentives to provide certain "extra" "Old West" or equestrian design amenities within their projects. Of particular interest are covered arcades or porches, wood plank sidewalks, old west artifacts (water troughs, wind vanes, hitching posts), benches, and signs painted on walls. Establish a program to expedite removal of existing signs that do not confonn to the regulations or design theme of this Specific Plan. Consider economic incentives for owners who wish to architecturally rehabilitate, refurbish, Old Town storefronts in accordance with the design guidelines of this Specific Plan. Establish Main Street as the "heart" of the community by creating a pedestrian oriented, nostalgic downtown of old California. Develop a new sign regulation ordinance for Old Town which specifically addresses the types of signs that were available to shopkeepers in the late 1800's to early 1900's. Develop a specialized regulation for right-of-way encroachment by "thematic" architectural features such as canopies, porches, arcades, and other projections. Encourage graffiti resistant materials whenever feasible. Old Town Specific Plan 11- 3 Eliminate overhead utility lines throughout Old Town if feasible. . Consider purchasing existing billboard signs if it is detennined to be economically feasible. 2. LAND USE/ECONOMIC Goal Develop "Old Town" to provide a variety of local and tourist oriented retail services, office, culturaVcivic, and residential opportunities. Objectives Maximize the economic base of Old Town through the definition ofland use districts to insure expansion of a variety of land uses desirable to the districts including, specialty retail, tourist and local serving retail uses, specialty retail/service, office uses, and residential uses (single and multi-family). Ensure the gradual upgrade of underutilized parcels functioning at less than their market potential. Discourage further fTeestanding residential uses in the Old Town core. Encourage mixed use as it might have occurred in the late 1800's or early 1900's. . Through economic development activities and incentives, focus on attracting new commercial uses and retaining existing development which add to the "thematic" ambience 0 fOld Town such as a blacksmith, wine tasting facility, saloon, barber, ice cream parlors, candy store, general store, and feed/tack store. Policies Establish regulations that promote pedestrian oriented plazas and courtyards; and that encourage active retail commercial uses in the core of Old Town. Prepare development regulations and design guidelines that clarify the expectations of the City in terms of the quality of new development in the Old Town area. Establish regulations that assure compatibility of existing and new commercial uses within established land use districts while employing specific, well designed buffers fTom adjacent exclusively residential developments. . Old Town Specific Plan II- 4 . . . Establish development incentives to encourage the introduction of a thematic western town specialty shopping development. Discourage new land uses in Old Town such as automotive sales, service and repair uses, fast food drive-thru's, a traditional shopping center, mini marts, and large grocery establishments. Discourage major lot consolidation and development which encourages large single-user tenants on lots greater than 50,000 square feet in Old Town. Establish assistance programs to aid property and businesses owners with property improvements that further the implementation of the Specific Plan. Establish height limit zones in Old Town which relate to the scale of the streetscape, historic building construction techniques, and land use. Establish a sensitive non confonning use provision in the Specific Plan which provides incentives for early compliance. Establish regulations which may waive all or portions of a parking requirement for a desirable land use. Establish public restrooms in the area. Include single and multiple family uses, and hotel or bed and breakfast type uses in Old Town. Encourage office uses in Old Town that occupy second floor or side street building space. 3. CIRCULATION/PARKING Goals Facilitate efficient and safe movement of people and vehicles within and through Old Town and provide safe, adequate, and accessible parking in Old Town. Objectives Provide additional vehicular creek crossings in Old Town, particularly at Sixth and First Streets. Create a pedestrian oriented environment in the Old Town core and along Murrieta Creek. Old Town Specific Plan II - 5 Provide easily identified, adequate and accessible parking with organized and consistent circulation systems throughout the Old Town area. . Redirect local through traffic vehicular trips away ITom Old Town Front Street onto the future western bypass road. Policies: Require pedestrian-oriented street furniture at pedestrian gathering points and along Murrieta Creek through private development improvements. Provide adequate parking identification signs for all public parking areas not directly visible ITom Old Town Front or Main Streets. Consider alternative parking and streetscape design for Old Town Front and Main Streets to reflect a traditional small community downtown. Establish parking standards for the designated land use districts which adequately reflect the individual character and uses proposed for those districts. Consider parking waivers or reductions for highly desirable uses. Utilize landscape and hardscape design features to soften parking and pedestrian areas for new and existing development and public parking lots. . Encourage the efficient use of alley ways and rear building entrances to minimize the necessity for access off primary and secondary streets. Limit existing and future vehicular access onto Old Town Front Street, but especially in the Old Town core. Delineate desirable vacant properties that could be used for public parking lots. Provide parking areas at the north and south end of the district with horse drawn wagon/trolley serving Old Town during high traffic use periods. Provide additional pedestrian crossings over Murrieta Creek. Locate parking and other public uses in areas behind, or off of, Old Town Front and Main Streets, or along Murrieta Creek (proper buffering required). Consider designating truck routes and weight limits for streets in Old Town. . Old Town Specific Plan 11- 6 . . . 4. MURRIETA CREEK Goal To create technically sound and safe creek "improvements" which will reduce the threat of flooding, in Old Town and add to the vision for Old Town. Objectives Provide improvements which will aesthetically be compatible with the vision for Old Town. Capitalize on the improvements to add desirable pedestrian/equestrian trails along the creek's edge or in the creek bottom. Coordinate any plans for the creek with other city adopted master plans. Policies Whenever possible, avoid vertical concrete channel walls and use Old Town appropriate themed materials and colors. Ensure that the "improved" creek contains living plant materials which are indigenous to a watershed area. Encourage the implementation of measures that delay or retain runoff onsite throughout the Valley to reduce flood flows in Murrieta Creek. Discourage the continued narrowing of the floodway and channel for Murrieta Creek. Provide amenities such as trails, plazas, and seating areas along Murrieta Creek as part ofthe nonnal development review process. Old Town Specific Plan II - 7 D. INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS . This section 0 f t he Specific Plan contains i nfonnation required b y S tate Law 0 n the infrastructure and utilities necessary to support development in this area. This infonnation is intended to supplement the other standards and requirements identified in the Plan. 1. Road Network The ability 0 f residents and visitors to effectively access the Old Town area is vital to the area's future success. The areawide road network is established by the City General Plan. WitIún the context of the General Plan, the Old Town Specific Plan further describes the circulation network within the Old Town district. The primary circulation route within the 0 Id Town Specific Plan i sOld Town Front Street. The secondary circulation routes are Mercedes StreetIMoreno Road, Main Street, and the route of Pujol Street/Sixth Street/Felix Valdez Road. In this last example, the secondary route portion of Sixth Street is only that portion that links Pujol Street to Felix Valdez. Rancho California Road and Santiago Road! First Street are perimeter roads and are addressed in the General Plan. All other roadways with the Old Town Specific Plan are considered to be local streets. The proposed road network for the Old Town Specific Plan is found in Exhibit II-I. The typical configurations and rights-of-way for the streets within the Old Town Specific Plan are listed below. Old Town Front Street North of the south Moreno Rd Loop 4 travel lanes in 88 feet South of the south Moreno Rd Loop 2 travel lanes in 60 feet Mercedes Street 2 travel lanes in 60 feet . Moreno Road Main Street 2 travel lanes in 88 feet 2 travel lanes in 60 feet Pujol Street/Sixth Street/Felix Valdez Local serving streets 2 travel lanes in 60 feet 2 travel lanes in 60 feet In most circumstances, the Old Town Specific Plan does not anticipate the installation of additional traffic signals within Old Town Temecula. The possible future exceptions to this are the intersections of Santiago Road and Pujol Street and Mercedes StreetIMoreno Road and Old Town Front Street. These intersections may need to be signalized when warranted due to potential turning movement conflicts and future development west of the Old Town area. In all other cases, stop signs are the preferred method to control and prioritize vehicular traffic. . Old Town Specific Plan II - 8 Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Exhibit 11-1 Roadway Improvements and Build-Out Recommendations BOOBB 81mlnale the '"'~ti"!l F"" S..., OOMectionS to Old Town F<om S.eeI "."the Inte- o'8&,'ago Road/Ofd Town F<om"""", to i""","", oa- and bett", a<=mmodale turning movements, and to ",""de one ""';ghtfm...'d 4-way inta>saction at doee to 900 on ead> leg. cecco """'de a new ""hleula, """"ng of Mometa Croe. at 6th S..... as a Cofl- roadway. 00000 Recoostruct the MaJn 81""" Broge at Momela C,'" to s""'" pad_a""""",e ""v~. @ Theexte'sionot8&m~goRoedtotheWests~eConld"'Faality, @ ~=o;:,':'t'..\:=~~~ezA""""'souIherty'Othe b,. N 400 400 800 Feet <\g;s\kelii\erevfewpro ectsloJdtown_8_study_a....a", 2. . Water System Water distribution services in the Old Town area are provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Since the initial adoption, the City has worked with RCWD to provide adequate water service in Old Town. Based upon these system upgrades and the project development in Old Town Temecula, the current system should be adequate to meet future water needs. However, additional development west of Old Town requires changes to the current network to meet this currently unspecified need. The current backbone water system is shown in Exhibit II-2. In addition, there are reclaimed water lines that have the potential to serve portions of Old Town. These are located (detailed information not yet available). 3. Sewer System Wastewater collection service is provided by Eastern Municipal Water District EMWD). Over the last ten years, EMWD has made a number of improvements to the wastewater collection system to meet current and future needs. The upgrading and relocation of the First Street lift station has corrected most of the problems. Additional new development west of Old Town may require some changes to the current network to meet future needs. The current wastewater collection system is shown in Exhibit II-3. . 4. Drainage System The regional drainage system component in the Old Town area is the channel of Murrieta Creek, a primary tributary to the Santa Margarita River. In this area, the historic drainage pattern has always been into Murrieta Creek. All current and future drainage ITom this area is expected to continue to flow into the Murrieta Creek. The on-street drain inlets collect storm water flows and transport it directly to the Creek. The majority of these drainage structures range from to in size. s. Solid Waste The City of Temecula currently contracts for refuse collection and recycling services. Through this contract, the Old Town area currently receives solid waste disposal services. Refuse collected locally is currently taken to the EI Sobrante and Badlands Landfills for disposal. . Old Town Specific Plan IJ- 10 Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Exhibit 11-2 Proposed Water Improvements ."'./Existing Water (RCWD Data) >~~/Proposed Water ~ N 400 c\glslkelUla""_ectsloidlow"-'2_study_a......,. Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Exhibit 11-3 Proposed Sewer and Reclaimed Water Improvements . .A./8 Inch Force Main /.~.., Existing Sewer (EMWD Date) ¡,'!\' Proposed Sewer ~ Proposed Reclaimed Water 400 , b,. N 400 800 Feel "\gis\keIl""""","",o oc1s\oldt""U3_study_a~.a", . . . 6. Electricity Electrical service is currently provided by Southern California Edison. There is presently an electrical distribution network in place in Old Town. Adequate regional electrical power supply can be provided to the Old Town area as it redevelops. The City requires that all new lines (up to 34KV) be underground. 7. Natural Gas Natural gas service is currently provided by the Southern California Gas Company (SCG). There is presently a natural gas distribution network in place in Old Town. SCG has indicated that it can continue to provide natural gas to the Old Town area. 8. Telephone Service Local telephone service is currently provided by Verizon. There is presently a telephone network in place in the Old Town area. This existing network will continue to provide all necessary wire-based telephone services. In addition, there is an existing network of cellular telephone facilities in and around Temecula that also provide service to Old Town. 9. Parks and Recreation Facilities There is currently one park facility within the Old Town Specific Plan. Sam Hicks Monument Park, at the corner of and Moreno and Mercedes Streets, is adjacent to the Temecula Museum. The facilities include a tot lot, picnic tables, and a gazebo. In addition to this, the Boys and Girls Club has a facility just outside the Plan area at the corner of First and Pujol Streets. A proposed recreation facility/park adjacent to the Boys and Girls Club is currently under design. It is anticipated to include an enhanced gymnasium and additional meeting and activity areas. The provision of a future "town square" is also being considered. While the exact location and facilities have not been determined, the facility would provide a public gathering space that would be integrated into the current Specific Plan. Old Town Specific Plan II-13 . . . III. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CONTENTS: A. Introduction B. Establishment of Land Use Districts and Map C. Land Use Regulations D. Site Development Standards E. Relationship of the Specific Plan to Other Codes F. Supplemental and Special Use Standards G. Sign Regulations H. General Provisions and Regulations A. INTRODUCTION Page 111-1 Page 111-1 Page 111-4 Page 111-10 Page 111-13 Page 111-14 Page 111-24 Page 111-29 The Old Town Specific Plan area is comprised of eight land use districts. Each district establishes permitted land uses and development standards which are intended to implement the goals, policies and objectives of this Specific Plan, as contained in Section II, and the City's General Plan. These land use regulations and development standards constitute the primary zoning provisions for the Old Town Specific Plan area. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF LAND USE DISTRICTS AND MAP 1. Specific P Ian Land Use Districts. T he f oIlowing Land U se Districts (Planning Areas) are hereby established within the Old Town Specific Plan area: D D Highway Tourist Commercial (HT) District Old Town Civic (OTC) District Tourist Retail Core (TRC) District Community Commercial (CC) District Tourist Serving Residential (TSR) District Medium Density Residential (MDR) District High Density Residential (HDR) District Open Space (OS) District D D D D D D The Specific Plan Land Use Map (Exhibit III-I) depicts the boundaries of each land use district within the Specific Plan area. Old Town Specific Plan 111-1 Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Exhibit 111-1 Proposed land Use Districts Map CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAl HT HIGHWAY TOURIST OTC CMC me TOURIST RETAIL CORE TSR TOURIST SERVING COMMERCIAL OS OPEN SPACE ^ MDR MEDIUM DENSITY RESlDEN11AL i..l HDR HIGH DENSITY RESIDEN11AL N 400 0 400 BOO Fee' c '"', \k~""""iewpro _\oIdIown -" J"OPOSØd -'a",eo-.... . . . 2. Descriptions of Land Use Districts. a. Highwav Tourist Commercial (HT). The Highway Tourist Commercial designation is intended to provide for those uses that are located adjacent to major transportation routes and may be oriented to the needs of tourists and recreation enthusiasts. Highway Tourist Commercial development should be located a t appropriate locations, and developed as clusters of commercial development rather than as shallow commercial frontage along major streets. Typical uses may include tourist accommodations and lodging facilities, automobile service stations, restaurants, convenience stores, and gift shops. The facilities should be well landscaped and provide an attractive visual Image. b. Old Town Civic (OTC). The Old Town Civic designation is intended to provide for public and quasi-public uses such as parks, city offices, police/fire stations, public day care centers, senior citizen centers, community centers, museums, and similar facilities. c. Tourist Retail Core (TRC). The Tourist Retail Core designation is intended to provide for those uses that support and compliment the pedestrian-oriented core. The designation typically includes small scale, boutique-type retail businesses. Service and office uses are generally allowed on either the second floor or on non-Old Town Front and non-Main Street parcels only. Residential uses are allowed as ancillary uses when located above the ground floor or in the rear of the lot. Tourist retail uses are generally small businesses occupying no more than 5,000 square feet. Typical uses may include gift shops, restaurants, small hotels, bed and breakfasts, mixed use, antique shops, small hardware/decorator stores, museums, art galleries, flower shops, jewelry shops, clothing shops, custom furniture items, and similar retail uses. d. Communitv Commercial (CC). The Community Commercial designation includes retail, professional office, and service-oriented businesses that serve the entire community. Community commercial areas typically include neighborhood commercial uses, as well as, larger retail uses including department stores, theaters, restaurants, professional and medical offices, and specialty retail stores. e. Tourist Serving Residential (TSR). T he Tourist Serving Residential designation is intended to provide for the wide range of tourist serving overnight accommodations which include senior housing, bed & breakfasts, hotels, motels, motor courts, rental cottages, and hostels. Eating places would be allowed as accessory uses. Camping and R.V. parks would not be allowed. Old Town Specific Plan III - 3 3. f Medium Density Residential (MDR)- The Medium Density Residential designation (7 to 12 dwelling units per acre) is intended to provide for the development of attached and detached residential development. Typical housing types may include single family detached, single family zero lot line, patio homes, duplexes, townhouses, condominiums, garden apartments and conventional apartments. g. High Density Residential (HDR). The High Density Residential designation (13 to 20 dwelling units per acre) is intended to provide for the development of attached residential developments. Typical housing types may include townhouses, condominiums, garden apartments, and conventional apartments. h. ()Pen Space (OS). The Open Space designation includes both public and private areas of permanent open space along the floodways of Murrieta Creek. This designation is intended to include lands acquired by exaction, easement, fee, and other methods sanctioned by State and Federal law for parkland, for preservation of biological and cultural resources, and for protecting public safety from flood hazards. Land Use District Boundaries Where boundaries of the land use districts appear to follow streets, the boundary shall follow the centerlines of said streets. Where boundaries appear to follow existing property lines, they shall follow said property lines and shall not bisect portions of existing lots of record which are in effect at the time of adoption of this Specific Plan. The boundaries with the Open Space Land Use District along the channel of Murrieta Creek may bisect adjacent parcels. C. LAND USE REGULATIONS This section includes a matrix (Table III-I) which lists the land uses and indicates whether or not each use is permitted (P), conditionally permitted (C), or prohibited (-) in each of the land use districts within the Specific Plan area. When exceptions have been established, they are so noted at the end of the table. Permitted uses for the Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), and Open Space (OS) planning areas shall be the same as identified in the Development Code for the Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential and Open Space/Conservation zones, respectively, as periodically amended. Old Town Specific Plan 111-4 . . . . . . TABLE III-I LAND USE MATRIX LIST OF USES TSR HT I OTC I TRC CC A Adult entertainment businesses - - - - - Animal hospital - - - - - Antique sales - - - p p Appliance sales and repair - - - - P Art, photographic studios, galleries, school - - C P P supplies Athletic, aerobic and health gyms and weight - - - p' p reducing clinics Auction houses - p - - C Auditoriums/concert/convention halls - - C pI P Auto service station - p - - - Auto Related (including motorcycles): Sales or rental (with ancillary repair facilities in a totally enclosed area) - - - - C Service and repair - C - - - Parts and supplies (no on-site repair) - p - - p Specialty retail - p - p p Awnings and canvas goods, sales and service - - - - P (within an enclosed buildi¡¡g) B Bakery(retail only) p> p - P P Banks, savings and loans, financial institutions (new uses in excess of 1,250 sq. ft. - p - p p must provide sufficient off-street parking.) Barber shop p - - p> p Bar and cocktail lounge - C - C C (incidental food service only) Beauty colleges - - - - - Beauty shop p - - p" p Bed and breakfast p - - p - Bicycle rentals - p - pI P Bi~le sales - p - P' P Billiard/pool centers - - - - P Blood bank - - - - p Blu~rint and photocopy services - - - p' P Book, gift, stationary, newspaper sales - - - p3 P Bowling alley - - - - - Bridal shops/tuxedo and costume rentals - - - p'.3 P Business colleges and professional schools - - - - p Business and office services p p - p' p Butcher shop - - - p p Old Town Specific Plan III-5 TABLE III-I LAND USE MATRIX LIST OF USES TSR I HT OTC I TRC CC C Cabinet makin,g - - - - p Camera and film sales (including limited film - p - pI P I processim!\ Candy and confectioneries - - - p' p Car wash - full service - p - - - Car wash - self service - p - - C Carpet and floor covering - - - - p Catalog sales - - - pL P Catering services - p - - p Check cashing services - p - p3 P China and glassware sales - - - p p Clothin,g and apparel sales - - - p3 P Clubs, lodges and meeting halls - - p - p Coin and stamp dealers - - - p' p Communications and microwave installations' Community care facilities C - - - - Computers and video equipment - - - p' p Convalescent homes - - - - - Convenience market (with or without the sale - p - p3 P of alcoholic beverages) Cosmetologist p - - pL P Costume rentals - - - 1>' p Cultural/artist exhibits, and art sales: P - C P - D Dance halls and discotheques - C - C C Dance schools and studios - - - p' p Day care centers p p p - p Delicatessens and sandwich shops - p - p' p Department stores - p - - p Dispensing opticians - - - pL P Discount/club membership stores - - - - - Drapery and curtain sales - - - - p Drug stores and pharmacies - p - p p Dry cleanin,g and laundry - - - C P E Educational and tutorial centers p - - - p Electric equipment and supplies - - - - p (within an enclosed building) EQuipment sales and rental - - - - - F Farmers market I - I - C C I - Feed, grain and tack sales - I - I - p3 I - Old Town Specific Plan III-6 . . . . . . TABLE III-I LAND USE MATRIX LIST OF USES TSR HT OTC TRC CC Finance and insurance offices P P - p' p Fishinl! suoolv stores - - - p' p Floor covering sales - - - - P Florist shoos - P - p' p Fortune telling, spiritualism or similar activity - P - p' p Funeral parlors - - - - - Furniture and home furnishings - - - pT P Furniture and upholstery repair and supplies - - - - - Furriers - - - p' P G Game Arcades - - C' C Garden equipment, supply, sales and service - - - - - Gift, novelty, souvenirs - P - p' p Governmental offices - p p p p Grocery store and market (retail only) - - - p' p Grocerv store, wholesale - - - - - Gun sales - - - p' P H Hardware stores - - - pi P Health food stores - P - p' p Hearing aids - - - p' P Hobbv and craft shops - - - p' p Home improvement centers - - - - - Hosnitals - p - - - Hospital equipment sales and rental agencies - - - - - Hotels/motels P P - P P I Ice cream and vogurt shons/soda fountains - P - p' p Interior decorating shops - - - p' p Instant printing and nhoto copying services - - - p2 P Insurance agents, brokers and services P P - p' P J Janitoria] supplies I - - - - I p Jewelry sales I - - I - p I p K Kitchen equipment sales I - - I - - I p L Laboratories, medical and dental - - - p' p Laundromats - - - - p Laundry service - - - C P Lighting fixture shops - - - - p Liquor stores - C - C C Lithographic services - P - P' p Old Town Specific Plan III-7 TABLE III-l LAND USE MATRIX LIST OF USES TSR HT OTC TRC CC Locksmith stores - - - P P Luggage and leather goods - P - P' P Lumber yard - - - - - M Machine tools and sales - - - - - Mail order businesses - - - P' P Mail services, postal boxes for rent - - - P' P Marine sales/service - - - - - Medical equipment sales - - - - - Membership clubs and organizations - - C - - Message centers - - - P' P Mini-storage - - - - - Mobil home sales - - - - - Mortuaries - - - - - Motorcycle sales and service - - - - - Movie theaters - P - P P Music, dance and exercise stores/studios - - - P' P N Newspaper offices - - - P' P Newsstand - P - P P Night Clubs (with live entertainment) - C - C C Nurseries and garden suPPlv stores - - - - P Nursing homes - - - - - 0 Office, business machine sales - I - I - I P' I P Orthopedic devices sales - I - I - I P' I P P Paint, glass, and wallpaper sales - - - - P Paper product sales - - - pj P Parking lots/garages P C C C P Parcel shipping/copy/fax center - - - P' P Pawnshop - - - - - Performing arts theater - - - P P Pet shops - - - P' P Phonographic/CD/tape/record store - - - P' P Photo-developing stores - P - pj P Photographic studios P - - p',j P Picture framing shops - - - P' P Pin ball and electronic game arcades - C - C C Plumbing and equipment supplies - - - - - Private schools - - - - - Professiona] and medical offices P P - P' P Old Town Specific Plan III-8 . . . . . . TABLE 111-1 LAND USE MATRlX LIST OF USES I TSR HT OTC I TRC I CC Q Reserved I I I R Radio and TV sales - - - p' P Radio and TV broadcasting - - - C' P Real estate office p p - P';' p Recording studios P - - p2 P Recreational vehicle sales - - - - - Recycling facilities - - - - - Religious institution C - - C C Religious materials sales - - - p' p Residential, attached and detached P - - C' - Restaurants: Without a full bar, entertainment, or dancing (includes the incidental serving of beer and wine only) p p - pI P With entertainment, dancing, and/or C C C C serving beer, wine and distilled spirits - Restaurant, fast food without a drive-thru - P - pi P Restaurant, fast food with a drive-thru - C - - - Rooming and boarding houses P - - p2 - S Second hand/thrift stores - - - p' p Security and commodities brokerage firms P - - p' p Sewing supplies and fabrics - - - p' p Senior citizen housing P - - - - Shoe sales and reoair - - - P' p Shoeshine stand - - - p - Sign shops - - - - p Skatin~ rinks - - - - - Sporting goods stores - - - p' P Sports and recreational facilities - - p p - Stationery stores - p - p' p Swimming pool and spa, sales and supplies - - - - - T Tailor shoos - - - p'" p Tanning salons p - - p' p Taxidermists - - - p p Telephone and communications store - - - p' p Theaters - p - pI P Ticket a~ency/entertainment p - - p' p Tile sales - - - - p Tobacco shops - - - p' p Old Town Specific Plan IlI-9 TABLE III-I LAND USE MATRIX LIST OF USES TSR HT OTC TRC CC Toy sales - - - p' P Travel agencies P - - p' P Trophies and awards - - - - P Truck sales/rentals - - - - - Typewriter and business machine sales and - - - P' P servtce U Reserved I I I I V Vending machine sales and service I - - I - I - I - Veterinarian I C - I - - I - Video sales and rentals - I - I - P' I P W Watch and clock repair - I - I - P' P Wedding chapels P I - I P - I - Wine tasting facility I - I - I - I P - P Use is permitted by right in this planning area C Use is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit in this planning area - Use is not Permitted in this planning area I Use is limited to under 5,000 gross square feet. , Use is limited to either the second floor (or higher) or to non-Old Town Front and non- Main Street parcels. , Use is limited to under 2,500 gross square feet. 4 Subject to the standards contained in Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Old Town Specific Plan 111-10 . . . . D. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS This section contains the development standards tables for the Specific Plan. Table III- 2 contains the site and development standards for the Highway Tourist Commercial (HT), Community Commercial (CC), and Tourist Retail Core (TRC) Land Use Districts. Table III-3 contains the site and development standards for the Tourist Serving Residential (TSR), Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), Old Town Civic (OTC), and the Open Space (OS) Land Use Districts. . Table 111-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMMERCIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS I HT TRC I CC Lot Size and Density Minimum Lot Area (square feet) I 10,000 3,500 I 8,000 Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre 0 I 12' I 0 Lot Dimensions Minimum Width at Required Front Setback Area 60 feet 25 feet 60 feet Minimum Comer Lot Width 100 feet 50 feet 60 feet Minimum Depth 80 feet 80 feet 80 feet Minimum Frontage at Front Property Line 80 feet 25 feet 60 feet Setbacks Minimum Front Yard 25 feet 0' 0' Maximum Front Yard N/A 10 feet J 20 feet Minimum Comer Side Yard 10 feet 0 0 Minimum Interior Side Yard 0 0 0 Minimum Rear Yard 10 feet 0 10 feet Minimum Accessory Building to Interior Side Yard 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Building Separation 0 0 0 Other Maximum StorieslHeight 3/50 feet 3/50 feet 2/30 feet Maximum Lot Coverage 70% 100% 70% Minimum Required Landscaped Open Space 20% 0%' 10% Maximum Fence, Wall or Hedge Height 6 feet 6 feet 6 feet Minimum Private Open SpacelUnit N/A 150 sq. ft. N/A This requirement does not apply to existing legal lots. 2. On the upper floors and in the rear lot areas only. J. Building shall be setback exactly ten feet if no covered arcade or porch is provided at the front of the building. , If a continuous porch or arcade (minimum 8 feet wide) is provided at back of sidewa1k , (public right-of-way) Limited accent landscaping should be provided whenever possible. . Old Town Specific Plan III-ll TABLE III-3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RESIDENTIAL & PUBLIC LAND USE DISTRICTS r TSR4 I MDR HDR OTC as Lot Area and Densitv Minimum Lot Area (square feet.) I I 5,000 I 7,000 7,000 None None Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre I 63 I 12 20 N/A N/A Lot Dimensions Minimum Width at Required Front 80 feet 40 feet 30 feet 0 0 Setback Area Minimum Average Lot Width 80 feet 50 feet 50 feet 0 0 Setbacks Minimum Front Yard 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Corner Side Yard 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 0 0 Minimum Interior Side Yard 10 feet' 15 feet' 15 feet' 0 0 Minimum Rear Yard 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Accessory Building to 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Interior Side Yard Minimum Senarations Between Buildines One Story 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 20 feet 0 Two Story 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet N/A N/A Three Story 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet N/A N/A Other Requirements Maximum Height 55 feet 35 feet 50 feet 18 feet 18 feet Maximum Lot Coverage 60% 35% 30% 50% 5% Minimum Required Landscaped 10% 25% 30% 10% 80% Open Space Minimum Private Open Space/Unit 0 200 sq.ft. 150 sq.ft. N/A N/A I. This requirement does not apply to existing legal lots. , The sum of both side yard setbacks. Distance between structures not less than 10 feet. 3 Higher maximum densities may be allowed by the City Council pursuant to the Village Center provisions described in the General Plan. 4 New buildings within the Tourist Serving Residential Planning District that are adjacent to and orient toward Mercedes Street are allowed to use the development standards for the Tourist Retail Core Planning District. Old Town Specific Plan III -12 . . . . . . E. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CODES 1. Development Code Many provisions of the Development Code (Municipal Code) will continue to apply in the Old Town Specific Plan when they do not conflict, undermine, or counteract the provisions of the Specific Plan. For purposes of consistency and clarity, special regulations or standards that are not addressed in this Specific Plan will be used by the Director of Planning to guide and control development in the Old Town area. Examples of Development Code provisions that apply to development with Old Town include, but are not limited to, the following: The Administration of Zoning - Chapter 17.03, as amended Permits - Chapter 17.04, as amended Development Plans - Chapter 17.05, as amended The Supplemental Development Standards - Chapter 17.10, as amended Off-Street Parking and Loading - Chapter 17.24, as amended The Water Efficient Landscape Design - Chapter 17.32, as amended The Telecommunications Facility and Antennas - Chapter 17.40, as amended 2. Conflicts Between the Specific Plan and Development Code Where there is a conflict between the regulations of the Development Code and this Specific Plan, the regulations provided herein shall prevail. Where direction is not provided in this Specific Plan, the provisions of the Development Code shall prevail. The development standards contained herein are minimum requirements. This provision shall not be used to permit uses, architectural styles or procedures not specifically authorized by this Specific Plan or the Development Code. 3. Other Applicable Codes and Codes All construction and development within the Specific Plan area shall comply with applicable provisions of the California Building and Fire Codes and the various related mechanical, electrical, plumbing codes, and the subdivision ordinance, as adopted by the City Council. In cases of a conflict between the provisions of any such code and this Specific Plan, the provision which most serves to protect health, safety, and welfare of the community shall apply and the Director of Planning shall resolve the conflict utilizing the Goals and Objectives of this Specific Plan. Old Town Specific Plan III-13 4. Other Special Regulations and Standards . Examples of other codes and regulations that specifically apply to development within Old Town include, but are not limited to, the following: Adult Business Ordinance Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance F. SUPPLEMENTAL AND SPECIAL USE STANDARDS The following supplemental development standards apply to development within the Old Town Specific Plan. The supplemental and special use standards include sidewalk cafes, vending carts, mixed use development, and bed and breakfast facilities, as well as other general supplemental requirements. 1. Sidewalk Cafes a. Intent. Sidewalk cafes on public streets can enhance the pedestrian ambiance of Old Town and are encouraged. For the purposes of this section, a sidewalk cafe is defined as any group of tables and chairs, and related decorative and accessory devices, situated in the public sidewalk or along the private porches and arcades in connection with the consumption of food and beverage sold to the public trom an adjoining indoor restaurant. . b. Sidewalk Cafes Permitted. A sidewalk cafe may be permitted only in land use districts which allow indoor restaurants. A sidewalk cafe may be located on public sidewalks, private porches, courtyards and arcades immediately adjacent to and abutting the indoor restaurant which operates the cafe, provided that the area in which the sidewalk cafe is located extends no farther along the sidewalk's length than the actual sidewalk frontage of the operating indoor restaurant and all other applicable provisions of this section are fulfilled. c. Development Plan and Encroachment Permit Required. Sidewalk cafés may be permitted with the approval of an Administrative Development Plan, in conformity with the requirements of the Specific Plan, and with approval of an Encroachment Permit for areas located with the public right-of-way. Both of these permits may be denied, approved, or approved subject to conditions of approval. . Old Town Specific Plan III - 14 . . . Old Town Specific Plan d. Requirements. requirements. Sidewalk cafes shall comply with the following i. An indoor restaurant may be permitted to operate only one sidewalk cafe and each sidewalk cafe shall be confined to a single location on the sidewalk. ii. As idewalk cafe may b e permitted 0 nly where the sidewalk 0 r porch is wide enough to adequately accommodate both the usual pedestrian traffic in the area and the operation of the proposed cafe. There shall be a minimum 4 8" clear distance free 0 f all obstructions, in order to allow adequate pedestrian movement. .~ , .1 SIDEWALK 1 .' I SIDEWALK CAFE I : ,obs1rucflon. ., iii All outdoor dining furniture in the public right-of-way, including tables, chairs, umbrellas, and planters, shall be movable. iv. Umbrellas must be secured with a minimum base of not less than 60 pounds. Outdoor heaters, amplified music, or speakers shall be reviewed at the time of application for a Development Plan. v. No signage shall be allowed at any outdoor cafe except for the name of the establishment on an awning or umbrella valance. VI. Sidewalk cafes do not require the provision of additional off-street parking. III-I5 vii. If a physical barrier is required by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to serve alcoholic beverages, the design and permanency of the barrier shall be approved by the Director. The physical barrier needs to conform with the design guidelines in Section IV ofthe Specific Plan. . e. Conduct of Business and Hours of Overation. All sidewalk cafes shall comply with the following performance standards. i. A sidewalk cafe may serve only food and beverages prepared or stocked for sale at the adjoining indoor restaurant. II. The outdoor preparation of food and busing facilities is prohibited at sidewalk cafes. iii. The presetting of tables with utensils, glasses, napkins, condiments, and the like is prohibited. All exterior surfaces within the cafe shall be easily cleanable and shall be kept clean at all times by the permittee. iv. Trash and refuse storage for the sidewalk cafe shall not be permitted within the outdoor dining area or on adjacent sidewalk areas and the permittee shall remove trash and litter as it accumulates. The permittee shall be responsible for maintaining the outdoor dining area, including the sidewalk surface and furniture and adjacent areas in a clean and safe condition. . v. All furniture used in the operation of an outdoor cafe shall be removed ITom the sidewalk and stored indoors whenever the indoor restaurant is closed. VI. The City shall have the right to prohibit the operation of a sidewalk cafe at any time because of anticipated or actual problems or conflicts in the use of the sidewalk area. Such problems and conflicts may arise ITom, but are not limited to, scheduled festivals and similar events, parades, repairs to the street or sidewalk, or emergencies occurring in the area. To the extent possible, the permittee will be given prior written notice of any time period during which the operation of the sidewalk cafe will be prohibited by the City. f. Suspension or Revocation. The development plan and encroachment permit may be suspended or revoked, following notice to the permittee and a public hearing, upon a finding that one or more conditions of approval for the permit or the requirements of this section have been violated, or that the sidewalk cafe is being operated in a manner which . Old Town Specific Plan IIl-16 . . . 2. constitutes a nuisance, or that the operation of the sidewalk cafe unduly impedes or restricts the movement of pedestrians past the sidewalk cafe. Vending Carts a. Purpose. Outdoor vending carts on private property promote public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment. However, reasonable regulation of outdoor vending carts is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. The purpose of this section is to set forth the conditions and requirements under which outdoor vendors may be permitted to operate on private property within the Specific Plan area. b. Vendor Permit Required. It shall be unlawful to sell, or offer for sale, any food, beverage or merchandise on any property within the Specific Plan area without first obtaining a Vendors Permit. Applications for a vendors permit shall include a description of the type of merchandise or food to be sold, a detailed description and photograph of the cart, and the approval of the owner of the site where the cart will be located. Vending Permits shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. The Director may apply any conditions necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. c. Vending Cart Requirements. Vending carts shall comply with the following requirements. i. All vending carts shall be located only on privately owned, developed commercial property. There should be at least 150 square feet of use able or recognizable plaza or courtyard area for each vending cart. ii. The design and appearance of the vending cart shall be consistent with the carts in use between 1890 and 1920 in a character consistent with the Design Standards in Section N of the Specific Plan. Colors used in conjunction with any vending carts located in the Old Town Specific Plan area shall be consistent with the Sherwin-Williams Preservation Palette. iii. Any umbrellas or accessory items used with vending carts shall be made fÌom high quality canvas, utilize a monochromatic color scheme consistent with the Preservation Palette and have no written or graphic advertising. iv. No cart shall exceed 4 feet in width, 8 feet in length, and 8 feet in height. Old Town Specific Plan III-17 v. Vending carts should be free of all obstructions within a six-foot perimeter. . vi. No advertising, except the posting of prices and product identification is permitted on any vending cart. The total allowable square footage for vendor cart signage shall not exceed four square feet on up to two opposing sides of the cart. d. Conduct of Business and Hours of Operation. All vending carts shall comply with the following performance standards. i. Operate only between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. unless in conjunction with an approved special event. 11. All items for sale to shall be placed only in, on or under the vending cart. No additional merchandise preparation or sales table, crate, carton, rack, or any other device to increase the selling or display capacity of the cart shall be used unless it has been approved in writing by the Director of Planning . Ill. Shall not solicit or conduct business with persons in motor vehicles. iv. . Shall not operate any loud speaker, public address system, radio, sound amplifier, or similar device. v. All vending carts shall require an approved City of Temecula business license. VI. Vending carts selling food or beverages shall comply with the requirements of the Health Department and shall provide a trash receptacle for public use. vii. Shall clean up the area around where the vending cart had been. This includes removing and disposing of all trash or refuse. viii. The Director 0 f Planning m ay require that t he vending c art be removed from the location and stored out of public view when not in use. . Old Town Specific Plan III-i8 . . . 3. e. Denial. Suspension or Revocation of a Vending Permit. Any license may be denied, suspended, or revoked in accordance with the procedures in the Development Code for any of the following causes: 1. Fraud or misrepresentation contained in the application for the license. ii. Fraud or misrepresentation made in the course of carrying on the business of vending. iii. Conduct of the licensed business in such manner as to create a public nuisance, or constitute a danger to the public health, safety, welfare, or morals or inconsistent with any conditions of approval. 111. Conduct 0 fthe business which i s c ontrary to the provisions of this section or the conditions of approval. Mixed Use Projects a. Purpose. The development of mixed use projects can present unique design issues not encountered in more conventional single use projects. The primary design issue relates to the need to successfully balance the requirements of commercial and residential uses. Typical examples include: a residential uses need for privacy and security, with the needs of commercial uses for access, visibility, parking and loading. For the purpose of this Specific Plan, mixed use projects are defined as developments which combine both commercial and residential uses or structures on a single lot, or as components of a single development in the Tourist Retail Core and Tourist Serving Residential Planning Districts. The uses may be combined either horizontally or vertically on the site. This means with office and residential uses on upper floors with retail on the ground floor, or with commercial uses on the primary street and residences on the rear of the property. b. Conditional Use Permit Required. A mixed use project may only be established after first obtaining a Conditional Use Permit, as described in the Development Code, and in conformance with the requirements ofthis section. Old Town Specific Plan ///-19 4. c. Limitations and Requirements. . I. Mixed use projects that provide commercial space on the ground floor with residential units above (vertical mix) are encouraged though residential units behind commercial space (horizontal mix) are also allowed. 11. The number of residential dwelling units shall be based on the carrying capacity and design characteristics of each project. iii. Residential units may not occupy ground floor space fronting on Old Town Front or Main Streets. iv. Structures with heights greater than two stories shall set back on the street frontage sides for the third floor portion of the structure a minimum of 10 feet. v. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened in accordance with the requirements of the Development Code. Special consideration shall be given to the location and screening of noise generating equipment such as refrigeration units, air conditioning, and exhaust fans. Noise reducing screens and insulation may be required where such equipment has the potential to impact residential uses. . vi. If onsite resident parking is provided, separate access drives and parking facilities should be provided for residential uses and commercial uses whenever possible. vii. Residential visitor parking and commercial parking may be located within the same location/facility. Bed and Breakfast Establishments a. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to provide standards for the development/operation of Bed and Breakfast establishments in Old Town. b. Requirements. All Bed and Breakfast Establishments in Old Town shall comply with the provisions contained in Chapter 17.10 of the Temecula Municipal Code, except for the minimum lot size and the requirement that the primary residence be the principle use of the site. . Old Town Specific Plan 111-20 . . . c. Supplemental Requirements. In addition to the requirements stated above, the following shall also apply to Bed and Breakfast Establishments within the Specific Plan. i. Off-street parking shall be provided at a ratio of one space for each bedroom available for rent in addition to the parking required for the primary dwelling unit. This requirement can be satisfied through a centralized public parking lot if the owner participates in a parking assessment district and the facility is located nearby. ii. Signage shall be limited to one on-site sign not to exceed 6 square feet in area. The sign may be freestanding. iii. The exterior appearance of the structure housing the Bed and Breakfast should be either a Queen Anne (Victorian), Bungalow, or other residential style of building in existence in the early 1900's. s. MinimumlMaximum Storefront Width For purposes of regulating the development of, and the division of existing storefronts, no storefront facing a public street shall be less than 20 feet wide or more than 100 feet wide. 6. Minimum Commercial/Office Building Subdivision Size For purposes of regulating the pennanent subdivision of the interior (floor to ceiling walls) of an existing storefront on the first floor, no building in the Specific Plan area shall create interior retail space intended for business purposes less than 500 gross square feet. Exceptions to this requirement may include restrooms and storerooms. 7. Loadiug Facilities Loading and unloading facilities shall be visually screened from access streets and adjacent properties and constructed in a manner to reasonably contain and restrict emission of noises typically attributed to such function. When screening of loading and unloading facilities is physically not possible, the facilities shall be architecturally integrated into the overall design of the building. Old Town Specific Plan III-2} 8. Roof Mounted Equipment . All roof mounted equipment shall be screened in accordance with the requirements of the Development Code- Special consideration shall be given to the location and screening of noise generating equipment such as refiigeration units, air conditioning, and exhaust fans. Noise reducing screens and insulation may be required where such equipment has the potential to impact residential uses. 9. Parking Requirements To minimize the amount of land committed to parking lots within the Old Town area, not all uses within the Specific Plan will be required to provide onsite parking. In most cases, the detennination whether or not parking will be required will be based upon the Land Use District and the type of business. When onsite parking is required, the standards contained in Chapter 17.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code will nonnally be used to detennine the number of required parking spaces. The following is a list of Land Use District parking requirements within the Old Town Specific Plan. 0 Tourist Retail Core District - Onsite parking is required only for hotels, motels, and banks and financial institutions that are more than 1,250 square feet is size. (The parking requirement for bed and breakfast establishments are contained in Section IILF.4.c of this Specific Plan.) . 0 Community Commercial District - All uses shall provide onsite parking. 0 Highway Tourist Commercial District - All uses shall provide onsite parking. 0 Old Town Civic District - Onsite parking should be provided when practical. 0 Tourist Serving Residential District - Onsite parking is required only for hotels and motels. (The parking requirement for bed and breakfast establishments are contained in Section IILF.4.c of this Specific Plan.) 0 Medium Density Residential District ~ All uses shall provide onsite parking. Q High Density Residential District ~ All uses shall provide onsite parking. 0 Open Space District - Onsite parking should be provided when practical and appropriate for the use. However, the Director may require assembly uses with high parking demands to provide additional off-street parking. In making this detennination the Director can consider the size and location of the proposed use, the hours of operation, the availability of nearby on- and off-street parking resources, and its proximity to other assembly and restaurant uses. . Old Town Specific Plan 111-22 . . . 10. Parking Location Restricted Locating parking lots between the front property line and any building is prohibited in the Tourist Retail Core planning area. 11. Vehicle Access Restricted Direct vehicle access shall not be allowed from a private property onto Old Town Front Street and Main Street (between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek). Vehicular access from a private parking lot to Old Town Front Street or Main Street shall be to a side street or public parking areas. The Director of Planning may allow exceptions only in case oflandlocked properties. 12. Pujol Access Standards Due to the higher volume of anticipated traffic on Pujol Street, the following standards are provided: a. Driveways on adjacent properties shall be placed as far from one another as possible; b. Only one driveway per Pujol frontage shall be allowed, except for emergency access, on lots with under 200 feet of Pujol Street frontage; c. Additional driveways shall only be allowed on lots with over 200 feet of Pujol frontage; and d. Driveways on the same property shall be located at least 250 feet apart. 13. Exterior Lighting a. All exterior lighting fixtures shall comply with the requirements ofthe Mount Palomar Lighting District. b. All lighting of the building, landscaping, parking lot, or similar facilities, shall be so shielded and directed as to reflect away from adjoining properties. c. Security I ighting fixtures are not to be substituted for parking lot or walkway lighting fixtures and are restricted to lighting loading, storage areas, and similar service locations. d. It is highly desirable and recommended for tenants and property owners to utilize low voltage "tivoli" or "dazzler" to decorate building facades. Old Town Specific Plan III - 23 G. SIGN REGULATIONS The intent of these regulations is to establish specific standards for all exterior signage that will ensure continuity, consistency, and harmony with the architectural quality of the Old Town environment as it may have appeared in the early 1900's. 1. 2. 3. 4. Applicability These regulations s hall apply to a II s ignage within the Tourist Retail C ore and Tourist Serving Residential areas of the Specific Plan. Signage within the Highway Tourist Commercial District, Community Commercial, Medium Density Residential District, and High Density Residential Land Use Districts shall comply with the sign requirements contained in the Development Code and the Signage Design Guidelines contained in Section IV.J of the Specific Plan. Permit Required Unless specifically stated in these regulations, a sign pennit is required prior to placing, erecting, moving, reconstructing, altering, or displaying any sign within the Specific Plan. Prohibitions No person shall erect, re-erect, construct, enlarge, alter, move, improve, remove, convert, or equip any sign or sign structure or cause or pennit the same to be done contrary to, or in violation of, the provisions of these sign regulations. All signs not expressly pennitted by this Section are prohibited. No application for sign pennit or other application for a prohibited sign shall be accepted, acted upon, or approved. Prohibited Signs in Old Town 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Freestanding signs on lots with less than 300' of road frontage Roofmounted signs Animated signs, including time and temperature displays Rotating, moving, emitting, or flashing signs Balloon signs Ambient air balloons Internally illuminated signs, including front and back lit awning and window locations Neon tube signs Window signs above the second story Paper, cloth, or plastic streamers or bunting - except holiday decorations Fonned plastic or injection molded signs Statues used for advertising Traffic sign replicas Vehicle signs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Old Town Specific Plan 111-24 . . . . . . 5. 6. 0 Any sign prohibited by the Development Code and not expressly pennitted in this Specific Plan Permitted Signs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wall Mounted Signs (business identification) Supergraphics Monument Signs Window Signs Under Canopy Signs Awning Signs Projecting Signs Indirectly Illuminated Signs Temporary A-Frame or Sandwich Board Signs Sign Standards a. Wall Mounted Signs. Maximum of one square fo~r linear /Tontage foot of business establishment. To be located ~higher than the lowest of the following points: ........---- 25 feet above grade; Bottom of the sill line of the second floor windows; or Cornice line of the building. b. Supergraphics. The purpose of allowing wall supergraphics is to allow the advertising or depiction of products that may have been available in an 1890's marketplace. A supergraphic is a mosaic, mural, painting, graphic art, or combination thereof which is professionally applied to a building that does not contain any brand name, product name, letters of the alphabet spelling or abbreviating the name of any product, company, profession, or business, or any logo, trademark, trade name, or other commercial message. Maximum size shall not exceed 60% of wall surface. c. Monument Signs. A maximum of one double sided sign per street /Tontage if said street frontage is over 150 feet. Height of sign shall not exceed 6 feet above grade. Width shall not exceed 4 feet. Each tenant placard shall not exceed 12 inches" high. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated, internal illumination is prohibited. No monument signs are allowed if the street /Tontage is less than 150 feet. d. Pennanent Window Signs. On ground level, coverage shall not exceed 20 percent of the total window and door area visible /Tom the exterior of the building; on second level, coverage shall not exceed 30 percent per window. (No window signs are pennitted above second floor). Old Town Specific Plan III - 25 e. Awning Signs. On ground floor level; 20 percent maximum coverage allowed of the total exterior surface area of each awning. On the second floor level and above; 10 percent maximum coverage allowed of the total exterior surface area of each awning. Internal illumination prohibited. . f. . Projecting Signs. One per business allowed; maximum size may not exceed 3 square feet and shall not extend more than 3 feet fÌ'om the wall surface. No illumination is allowed. Projecting signs shall only be attached to buildings, not to poles or other signs. Projecting signs may encroach into the public right-of-way a maximum of 3 feet subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. . Old Town Specific Plan 111-26 . . . g. Under Canopv Signs. One per business allowed under a canopy, roof, covered walkway, or porch; maximum size of 3 square feet per door entrance; minimum of 7 feet of vertical clearance shall be required fÌom walking grade to the bottom of the sign. A , ,~ " h. Temporary Signs. Temporary grand opening and special event signs are allowed for each business establislunent on the exterior wall. Signs shall not be attached to any other fÌeestanding element (porch balustrade, garden wall, tree, monument sign, vehicle, etc.). Signs shall be constructed of cloth, canvas, or other durable material. Plastic or vinyl banner signs are not permitted. The use of neon colored/day glow banner signs is also prohibited. All temporary signs, except for A-Frame/Sandwich Boards, shall abide by the provisions of the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs, as amended. i. A-Frame/Sandwich Board Sign. One A-fÌame or sandwich board sign allowed per property on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and nationally designated Monday holidays. The size shall not exceed 3.5 feet high and 2 feet wide. A-fÌame signs shall not block the sidewalk and may not be illuminated. No permit is required for A-fÌame and sandwich board signs which comply with these provisions. Old Town Specific Plan II1 - 27 j. . Menu Boards. One menu board, up to 4 square feet in area, is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. Menu Boards may contain only the name of the establishment and the food available inside. The menu board must be located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance. k. Appropriate location lor menu board sign .[U] . Multi-Tenant Project Signs. Any project that proposes to provide space for more than one tenant shall indicate the size and approximate location of all signs to be erected on the property at the time of initial application. Signs shall be shown on elevation drawings with accurate dimensions provided. . Old Town Specific Plan III - 28 . . . IV. DESIGN GillDELINES CONTENTS: A. Purpose and Intent B. Architectural Style Guidelines C. Site Planning Guidelines D. Parking Lot Guidelines E. Landscape Guidelines F. Lighting Guidelines G. Public Art Guidelines H. Outdoor Dining / Sidewalk Furniture Guidelines 1. Paving Material Guidelines 1. Sign Design Guidelines K. Streetscape Guidelines Page IV-l Page IV-2 Page IV-25 Page IV-35 Page IV-37 Page IV-40 PageIV-41 Page IV-45 Page IV-46 Page IV-47 PageIV-51 A. PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose ofthese Guidelines is to define an architectural vocabulary that will provide a measure of continuity to Old Town's commercial and higher density residential buildings. While some basic and consistent architectural principles are defined, variety and individual expression within this framework are encouraged. The community desires a character of architecture that will reflect Temecula Valley's history, natural landscape and climate. Architectural character is formed by the basic elements of a building and the manner in which they are combined. The desired character for buildings in Old Town is derived from early California (1890-1920) architecture, a design vocabulary reflected in the state's early missions and adobes. Its use has been a tradition for over 200 years in many communities of Southern California. There have been several periods of interpretation, revival and change; and many variations found in different communities of the state. While early California or Old Town Western architecture is not considered a specific style, several styles are often considered within it - Gold Rush, Spanish Colonial, and Monterey. In Old Town, these three styles shall be the most desirable historic prototypes for all new development. A Historical Note: Early California architecture came about as a result of the state's first settlers adapting Spanish and Mexican architectural precedents to the special conditions of California. The process normally meant simplifYing the more complex and ornate Spanish examples and their details, adjusting to the more spartan economy and conditions, different building materials, and primitive workmanship of California. As American conquest of California proceeded, the new settlers brought elements of eastern United States and Classical Revival architecture, combining them with the early a dobe and mission examples. The result was what we now call the Monterey Style. Many restored buildings of this period and style are found throughout the state, with the largest number in Monterey, and a well-known example, the Casa de Bandini, in San Diego's Old Town. Old Town Specific Plan IV-I B. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE GUIDELINES 1. Old Town Western Style. The most prevalent architectural style existing in the Old Town environment can best be described as Gold Rush Style or Western Frontier Style. This architecture has some common design elements depicted below. Guideline 1 - Graphic Depiction 0 f Common D esil!n Elements A fe Shown in the Followinl! Graphic. Shed roof with wooden shakes Multi-lile 40" Bulkhead double doors (maximum) 4 X 4 Wood columns with 6 X 6 bases Design Elements of the Western Sytle Old Town Specific Plan IV-l . . . . . . Guideline 2 - Recommended Western Style Elements The qualities and design elements of Western Style buildings in Old Town include: . . ten foot high ceiling preferred on the first floor; vertical or horizontal wood siding; narrow wood porches with single shed roofs or wood canopies; one and two story building mass; . . . . significant wall articulation devices (porches, overhangs) false roof parapets with heavy architectural cornice; simple or unpainted color schemes; rectangular facade; regular or traditional commercial storefront window rhythm; . . . . window shutters; balconies with balustrade; . . exterior wooden stairways; and knee bracing at posts, balconies and overhangs. . Guideline 3 - Not Recommended Western Style Elements The elements to avoid include: . . highly reflective surfaces; large blank, unarticulated wall surfaces; unpainted concrete precision block walls; reflective glass; . . . high tech plastic appearing siding; irregular, modernistic window shapes and rhythm; square "boxlike" buildings; . . . mix of unrelated styles (i.e. rustic wood shingles and polished chrome); and metal window sashes. . Old Town Specific Plan IV- 3 Guideline 4 - Solid to Void . . Storefì:ont construction should be approximately 60% transparent (void) with a maximum of85% transparency. Blank, solid end walls or side walls visible fÌ"om public view should be avoided. If such walls are necessary for interior reasons, the building wall should receive some foan of articulation of add-on elements such as awnings, cornice bands, arcades, trellises, etc. . Guideline 5 - Roof Pitch and Materials . Roofs may be flat or sloped. Western false fÌ"ont parapet walls are encouraged but blank parapet walls around flat roofs are not allowed without heavy architectural cornice. The visible portion of sloped roofs should be sheathed with a roofing material having texture meaningful at the pedestrian scale, such as standing seam metal roofing, wood shingle, or tile. Rooffoan should be consistent and integrated into the building composition. The roof should be designed to screen rooftop equipment fÌ"om all sides. Radical/steep roof pitches which create overly prominent or out-of-character building such as A-fÌ"ames or chalet style buildings are not recommended in Old Town. Roofs or parapet walls should wrap around the entire building to avoid a cheap "stage-set" look. Wood shingles, composition roofing material, tile, slate, or painted metal seam roofs meeting City Codes are acceptable. . . . . . . Old Town Specific Plan IV-4 . . . Guideline 6 - Parapet Walls Parapet walls are an integral component of western architecture. In addition to providing visual screening of roof top equipment, they provide opportunity to establish an architectural character and display of signs. The integration of parapet walls into building design is encouraged. Parapets shall confonn to the following guidelines. . Parapet walls shall completely screen the roof behind and all roof mounted equipment. They shall be finished on any side visible from the street with materials compatible with those predominantly used on the building. Parapet walls visible from rear or side yards shall be finished as above. However, they may utilize exterior plaster in lieu of wood siding. Parapet walls shall utilize significant ornamental wood trim at the top, or utilize a heavily ornamented cornice. . . . Typical Western Style Parapet Old Town Specific Plan IV-5 Old Town Specific Plan Guideline 7 - Exterior Buildinl! Wall Materials . Exterior building walls are encouraged to use the following materials in an appropriate arrangement. These include: . Board and batten wood siding (unfinished preferred); minimum of 12 inches with I inch by 2 inch bats Horizontal wood siding (finished or unfinished); horizontal 'V' joint horizontal channel joint ship lap with a minimum 3/8 inch channel beveled Brick; Stone (local granite is preferred); Adobe block (no bearing walls); and Yertical wood siding (such as plywood) without batten. . . . . . ( \ \ ¡ ) . '\ . , \ ,\ ; Board and Batten Shiplap . Brick Local Stone IV- 6 . . . Guideline 8 - Windows . . Wooden sash windows with decorative pediment are recommended. Storefront windows typically projected out from wall surface and were multi- lite. . Second floor windows were typically wooden sash, double hung, traditional windows. Window shutters are recommended. Plate glass windows are acceptable if they appear to be multi-lite windows or if the glass is "Turn of the Century" quality. . Guideline 9 - Porch/Canopy Columns . Columns are typically 4x4 or 6x6 lumber which is decoratively shaped to depict a base, shaft, and capital. Metal columns are acceptable. Decoratively braced columns are recommended. . . Old Town Specific Plan IV- 7 Guideline 10 - 360. Architecture . All sides of a building receive stylistic architectural treatment except as required by Fire and Buililing Codes where noncombustible materials (concrete block) may be needed in areas immediately adjacent to other structures. Guideline 11 - Color Palette . The wide range of colors which might have been used for exterior decoration in the late 1800's are well represented in the Sherwin-Williams Heritage Colors. These are 40 historic 19th Century hues that capture the grace and elegance of another era. Buildings of this style may remain unpainted, however painting is encouraged. While use of these colors is recommended, other similar colors will be considered. The Director may also identify other color palettes for Old Town that have the potential to achieve the same results. Old Town Specific Plan IV-8 . . . . . . 2. Spanish Colonial Style Spanish Colonial and Mission Style architecture are two very prolific historic architectural styles in Southern California. This style was very common in the late 1800's and early 1900's and is therefore important to include as a prominent building style in Old Town. Guideline 1 - GraDhic DeDiction of Common Desi!!n Elements are shown in the foUowin!! GraDhic. Shed and gable reols Exposed rafters and ratterJails rhick walls DesIgn Elements at /he Spanish Colanial Style Old Town Specific Plan IV-9 Guideline 2 - Recommended Spanish ColoniallMission Style Elements . The qualities and design elements of Spanish ColoniallMission style buildings include: . . one or two story building heights; red clay tile roofs; shallow-pitched tile roofs 2:12 to 6:12 pitch; . . solid, massive walls; smooth stucco wall surfaces; . . arcades of round headed or flat arches, set on columns of wood or stucco; enclosed courtyards; . . recessed wall openings; white or soft pastel earth tone colors; and, ceramic tile accents (planters, benches, fountains, etc.). . . Guideline 3 - Not Recommended SpanishlColoniallMission Style Elements The elements to avoid include: . . . high pitched or extensive flat roofs; simple, box-like architecture; . rustic, "woodsy" architectural styles; . . large roof/eave overhangs; extensive use of wood, glass, or metal . . slumpstone walls; wood siding; dark wall colors; . . metal window sash; and window fÌ'ames flush with exterior wall. . Guideline 4 - Solid to Void . Storefj-ont construction is recommended to be between 40% and 70% transparent. . Old Town Specific Plan IV-IO . . . Old Town Specific Plan Guideline 5 - Roof Pitch and Materials . Roof pitch for Spanish ColoniallMission style architecture is typically low pitch. A 3:12 to 6:12 (vertical:horizontal distance) roof pitch is recommended for all main roof surfaces, with the exception of arcades or colonnades. Roof pitch for attached arcades or colonnades is recommended to be a minimum 2:12. Rooftypes are recommended to be restricted to low pitched gable roofs, with the occasional use of hip or shed roof as an accent at the end of the building. The use ofa mansard, A-fTame,jerkin-head gambrel, or flat roofs are specifically not allowed. Roof material should be standard mission barrel (V-shaped) clay tiles. Each tile should be a unifonn reddish color and non-reflective (unglazed) for a soft finish look. Plastic tiles are not allowed. . . . Secondary (non-street facing) roofs may utilize "S" tiles of clay or concrete. A random application or tiles is recommended over symmetrical design. Tiles at the ends ofthe eaves shall be double or triple layered with exposed mortar to emphasize thickness. All flashing, vents, pipes, and sheet metal are recommended to be colored to match the adjoining roof or wall material. . :~ ...,~ HI' OR GABLE Recommended Roof Pitch IV-ll . Guideline 6 - Exterior Buildinl! Wall Materials . Building exterior walls should be smooth finished stucco. Heavily textured stucco walls are not recommended. . Simulated adobe walls (painted slumpstone) should not be used for structural (load bearing) walls. Wood, metal, glass, or slumpstone are not recommended as predominant exterior wall materials. At wall openings on primary (street facing) exterior walls, an appearance of thickness and mass is strongly recommended. . . . . Old Town Specific Plan IV -12 . . . Guideline 7 - Windows . Spanish ColoniallMission style windows range in shape from small rectangular, multi-lited casement frames to large round headed windows. Deeply recessed windows (minimum of twelve inches) in thick walls is an important characteristic. The use of flower pot shelves beneath windows is also recommended. Recommended trim colors include pastel blues, greens, reds, and beiges. Multi-lited windows recessed into wall surfaces are strongly recommended as display windows for commercial areas. The use of louvered glass, glass block or metal frame windows is not recommended. Reflective mirror glass is prohibited. Fabric awnings are recommended in moderation, while metal awnings are not allowed. . . Old Town Specific Plan IV-13 Guideline 8 - Columns and Arcades . . Stucco columns should be square in cross section and appear massive in thickness; 16 inches per side is recommended. The use of capitals and column bands is encouraged. A capital, approximately 2 to 3 inches thick by 3 to 6 inches high should be incorporated at the top of the columns. The column's height should be 4 to 5 times the width ofthe column (16 inch). A base band, height approximately one half the column width, should be provided. Arcades are recommended to have semi-circular arches in regular series with columns as supports. Variations such as parabolic arches are not recommended. Flat arches will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and should have heavy wood elements versus stucco. Arcades, patios, and colonnades are typically paved with tile, brick, or stone. . . . Old Town Specific Plan IV-14 . . . Guideline 9 - 360. Architecture . All sides of a building must receive appropriate stylistic architectural treatments. Guideliue 10 - Color Palette . Spanish ColoniallMission architecture is typified by simple white and off-white wall colors. While other light pastels might be proposed, their use is discouraged in favor of white, beige or white with an antique wash finish. Trim colors appropriate to this style include primary shades of blue and red, terracotta, aqua, medium to dark shades of green, and brown. Other colors may also be appropriate and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. . Old Town Specific Plan IV - 15 3. Monterey Style . As American conquest of California proceeded, the new settlers brought elements of eastern United States and Classical Revival architecture, combining them with the early adobe and Mission examples. The result was what we now call Monterey Style. Many restored buildings of this period and style are found throughout the state. The most notable local example depicting elements of this style is the Welty Hotel. Guideline 1 - Gravhic Deviction of Common Desil!n Elements are Shown in the Followinl! Gravhic. Simple geometric shape Woed-- Siding Nanow Wood Balconies . Symmetrical Placement of Windows and 000" Mulli-Ine windows with wood casement Design Elements of the Monterey S/yfe . Old Town Specific Plan IV-16 . . . Guideline 2 - Recommended Monterey Stvle Elements The qualities and design elements of Monterey Style buildings include: . . gabled, low pitched, shingled roof; ten foot high first floor ceiling; symmetrical placement of windows and doors; entrances with side and transom lites; narrow wood porches and second floor balconies with wood railings; modest to large roof overhangs; use of wood window shutters; . . . . . . rectangular facade; and minimal wall articulation. . Example of Typical Monterey Style Architecture Old Town Specific Plan IV-J7 Guideline 3 - Not Recommended Monterey Style Elements . The elements to avoid include: . . highly reflective surfaces; unpainted concrete precision block walls; reflective glass; steep roofs or flat roofs; . . . . irregular, modernistic window shapes and rhythm; and metal sash windows. Guideline 4 - Solid to Void . Storefront construction is recommended to be between 40% and 60% transparent. Guideline 5 - Roof Pitch and Materials . Roofpitch for Monterey style architecture is typically low pitch. A 3:12 to 6:12 (vertical:horizontal distance) roof pitch is recommended for all main roof surfaces. Roof types should be restricted to low pitched gable roofs. The use of a mansard, A-Frame, jerkin-head gambrel, or flat roofs is specifically not recommended. . . . Roof material should be comprised of wood shingles, composition roofing material, flat tile, slate or painted metal seam floors meeting City Codes. . Old Town Specific Plan lV-I8 . . . Guideline 6 - Exterior Buildinl! Wall Materials Exterior building walls are encouraged to use the following materials in an appropriate arrangement. These include: . smooth stucco; . board and batten wood siding; . horizontal wood siding; . brick/stone; and . adobe block (no bearing walls). Guideline 7 - Windows . Wooden sash windows, double hung with 2 over 2 or 6 over 6 lites are recommended. Wood window shutters are recommended. . Typical Window Frame Details Old Town Specific Plan IV -19 Guideline 8 - Porch/CanoDV Columus . . Porches are almost always constructed as covered balconies that are cantilevered out fÌ'om the second floor. It is recommended to have the balcony extend fÌ'om one end of the building to the other. Balcony columns are typically 4 x 4's or 6 x 6's and constructed of wood. A typical feature of Monterey architecture is the wood railings and balustrades on the second floor balcony. . . . Typical porch layout . Typical Balcony Details Old Town Specific Plan IV-20 . . . Guideline 9 - 360. Architecture . All visible sides of a building receive stylistic architectural treatment. Guideline 10 - Color Palette . The wide range of colors which might have been used for exterior decoration in the late 1800's are well represented in the Sherwin-Williams Heritage Colors. These are 40 historic 19th Century hues that capture the grace and elegance of another era. Buildings ofthis style may remain unpainted, however painting is encouraged. While use of these colors is recommended, other similar colors will be considered. The Temecula Planning Department maintains a full color brochure of the Sherwin-Williams Heritage Colors for public inspection. The Director may also identify other color palettes for Old Town that have the potential to achieve the same results. Old Town Specific Plan IV- 21 4. Other Period Stvles (earlv 1900's) . The three previously described architectural styles are the most desirable for Old Town. Extensive guidelines for other styles in existence during the early 1900's are not provided herein due to (1) their urban undesirability for Old Town; (2) likelihood of quality reproduction due to high cost of construction (The Bank/Classic Revival), or (3) limitation to mostly residential structures (California Bungalow and Victorian). Other historic styles will be considered for residential constructions If an applicant desires to introduce an architectural style into Old Town which is not provided for in these guidelines, the burden of proof shall lie with the applicant to provide evidence (historical or otherwise) that the particular style is appropriate for Old Town. Applications for development utilizing the following styles w ill be considered by the Director of Planning on a case-by-case basis. . Classic Revival- This revival style that was common between 1900 and 1920, was based primarily on Greek and to a lesser extent on Roman orders. This style produced symmetrically arranged buildings of monumental proportions. Colossal pedimented porticos were often flanked by a series of pilasters. Arches. and enriched moldings were not generally used. r= . .~ . Old Town Specific Plan IV - 22 . . . . Queen Anne - Queen Anne was a prominent architectural style in the 1880s and 1890s. Of all the Victorian house styles, Queen Anne is the most elaborate and the most eccentric. Although easy to spot, the Queen Anne style is difficult to define. Common elements include: bay windows, balconies, stained glass, turrets, porches, brackets, an abundance of decorative details, with steeply pitched and irregular roofs, all combined in often unusual and unexpected ways. Old Town Specific Plan IV-23 . Craftsman Bungalow - . California Bungalow buildings are well represented in Old Town residential housing stock along Pujol Street. As a result, new residential construction in Old Town should utilize the California Bungalow as a model. The following graphic depicts the most notable bungalow architectural features. Roof Vent Typical Brackets Po~ . Rafter Tails Porch RoorVent. . Brackets Gable End Porch . Old Town Specific Plan IV-24 . . . C. SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 1. Introduction. The area comprising the core of Old Town Temecula is typical of many small town/rural main streets. The buildings are predominantly side by side, fonning a fairly continuous street wall, and are not set back from the right-of-way or sidewalk. The pedestrian quality ofthis relationship is enhanced by some arcades, mature trees, benches, and lack of emphasis on parking lots and parked cars. West Main Street is the oldest and most cohesive street in the area, however, many other streets in Old Town exist that do not contribute to the cohesiveness ofthe area. This cohesiveness is lost whenever parking lots are placed between the public right-of-way and the front ofthe building. These storefront parking lots have been allowed in the past instead ofrequiring new buildings to maintain the continuous street wall. It is the intent of these site planning guidelines to intensify the pedestrian activity which characterizes this area through requiring side, rear, or no on-site parking lots. Pedestrian passages to parking areas adjoining mid-block alleys are encouraged to facilitate the parking lot locations. 2. Commercial Site Planning Guidelines Guideline 1 - Lot Coveral!e . Commercial (and mixed use) buildings in core of Old Town are not regulated by site coverage maximums. If the building meets all the setback requirements, a development proposal my cover the entire remaining portion of the lot. Guideline 2 - Front Building Wall . The front porch or arcade of any building located in the Old Town Tourist Retail Core should be built to the front property line. New buildings are encouraged to set back the comers of buildings at the intersections to create pedestrian plazas as well as improve visual sight lines for vehicles. Comer setbacks of at least 10 feet are desirable. Any building located at a comer intersection should incorporate architectural features at the ground floor which emphasize the importance of pedestrian movement. These features may include building cut-offs, walk-through covered arcades, trellis structures, and other elements which focus visual interest on the comers. . . . Awnings, trellises, stairs and other accessory building structures approved by the Director may project into the public right-of-way. If required by the Director of Public Works, an encroachment pennit shall be also be required. Old Town Specific Plan IV-25 Guideline 3 - Parallel Walls . . Commercial buildings should be oriented on the lots in Old Town in a traditional town fashion. . The ITont building wall should be oriented parallel to the street. Slight modifications can be acceptable although entire ITontages set on a 45 degree or more angle to the street are not consistent with traditional development patterns. Pedestrian access for all buildings should be oriented to the major street upon which it is located. Secondary rear pedestrian entries are also recommended. Creek adjacent buildings are encouraged to orient pedestrian access on the creek side. . Guideline 4 - Boardwalk Svstem . The use 0 fa covered boardwalk, porch, 0 r arcade is strongly encouraged adjacent to the public pedestrian right-of-way (sidewalk). Each project on Main Street and Old Town Front Street shall incorporate such a pedestrian system. The minimum width for a boardwalk is 8 feet. However, if seating areas are to be provided the minimum width should be 10 feet or greater. Similar pedestrian amenities should also be considered on side streets. Buildings located on corner lots on Old Town Front Street shall also incorporate provisions for a pedestrian boardwalk on the side street ITontages. . . . s_,"""'" ~ k1ecn = LN . Old Town Specific Plan IV.26 . . . Guideline 5 - Detached Accessorv Buildin!!s . Detached accessory buildings shall be placed on permanent foundations and constructed of materials and painted with colors that are compatible with the main building. The designated use 0 f a commercial detached accessory building shall be appurtenant to the use of the main building and located on the site based on its design and function. Detached accessory buildings shall be subject to the architectural guidelines and development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan and meet all applicable City of Temecula building and fire codes. . . Guideline 6 - Fences and Walls . All fencing and wall materials utilized within the commercial districts of the Old Town Specific Plan Districts shall be compatible with the architectural theme of the adjacent building. Stacked river or natural rock, battered base walls and the traditional look of wrought iron are appropriate as well as western style wood fencing where applicable. Such structures should not act as a visual barrier to a building, porch or ITont yard. Use of indigenous and local historical materials such as granite for walls and fences is strongly encouraged. Incorporation of wall caps and pilasters at entry points can also be utilized where these treatments are indicated. Fencing should encourage an open commercial and residential neighborhood atmosphere, while providing a definition between public and private spaces, through the use of walls, fences and hedges around ITont yard areas. Architectural features such as garden walls, arbors and trellises are ideal to soften building mass and should be an integral part of the building. However, it is important to avoid a tacked on appearance to hide poor massing and architecture. Chain link and bare precision block or other concrete masomy unit (CMU) walls are not permitted fencing materials. Decorative wrought iron or rough-hewn wooden gates used to accentuate a fence, wall or building are permitted- Detailing of column pilasters with tile or appropriate decoration representing Western, Spanish ColoniallMission, Monterey or other period appropriate style elements are desirable. . . . . . . Old Town Specific Plan IV-27 Guideline 7 - Trellises and Shade Structures . Trellises should be constructed of materials compatible with the architectural character of the adjacent building. Heavy rough-hewn timber covered with vines is encouraged. Natural wood or neutral tone colors from the Sherwin- Williams Preservation Palette should be utilized. Covered walkways and shade structures associated with a building should adhere to the design elements of that structure. Materials such as brick, local stone, adobe block and stucco, in the case of Spanish ColoniallMission, Monterey, Western or period-appropriate styles, combined with natural timber and rough-hewn beams are recommended. G round I evell andscaping and wrap-around vines are encouraged to soften the look of these structures. . . . . Old Town Specific Plan IV-28 . . . Guideline 8 - Gutters and Downspouts . Gutters and downspouts on the exterior of buildings in the commercial districts should utilize designs consistent with the tum-of-the-century time period represented in Old Town. Materials used shall be color coordinated with the building they are attached to. Roof scuppers should not be placed in areas that are visible from the street or other public places. Guideline 9 - Awninl!s . Awnings can add color, relief and protection of pedestrian and patrons from the elements. They also can provide a setting for signage. The use of awnings to delineate building entries and help orient pedestrians to business locations is encouraged. Awning care and maintenance should be conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines. The useful life of a typical awning does not exceed eight (8) to ten (10) years. (A property owner should not contemplate the installation of these structures unless they are willing to replace them every eight (8) to ten (10) years.) All awnings within the Old Town Specific Plan area should be regularly maintained and kept free of fading, stains and tears. Colors of awnings shall be monotone hues selected from the Sherwin-Williams Preservation Palette and coordinated with the architecture of the building they are attached to. . . . . Awnings can be imprinted with simple signage in accordance with the provisions of the Sign Standards and Guidelines detailed in this Specific Plan. Lettering style and size should be in scale with the awning on which the sign is located as well as any adjacent awnings. Awnings should be made of high quality cloth (plastic, aluminum and vinyl material are not permitted) and be at least seven (7) feet high at the lowest point so as not to impede pedestrian traffic. Awnings should not be wrapped around buildings in a continuous band. Instead, these structures should be used to enhance the façade by placing them on top of doors, windows and other openings. Awnings should not be so massive as to dominate the façade but should be in scale with the rest of the building. Iflighted, awnings should be illuminated with period appropriate fixtures such as goosenecks. . . . . Old Town Specific Plan IV-29 Guideline 10 - Pocket Parks . In an effort to provide landscape breaks along the commercial streets of Old Town, a series of pocket parks in the form of pedestrian spaces, arcades as well as mid-block paseos and courtyards need to be provided. These areas can allow transitions between commercial buildings in addition top roviding a se tting for public art, seating, drinking fountains, and shade structures. Buildings and/or landscape elements surrounding a pedestrian space on a minimum of two sides typically define an area as a pocket park. . Appropriate design elements such as gateways, trellises, architecturally designed lighting and seat walls should be used to create a series of seating areas for pedestrians throughout Old Town. Columns and ornamental entry gates using native stone, iron or rough sawn timber are encouraged. . . Permanent outdoor seating for pocket parks can be incorporated into decorative masonry structures or architecturally compatible benches of native stone or brick and shall complement adjacent buildings and landscaped areas. Landscaping designs should follow the Old Town Specific Plan Guidelines. Pocket parks should be publicly accessible during daylight hours and linked to adjacent streets and sidewalks. . . . Typical Pocket Park Amenities . Old Town Specific Plan IV-30 . . . Old Town Specific Plan Typical Street Corner Pocket Park Typical Courtyard Details Guideline 11- Vendinl! Machines . Vending machines should be located along the face of a building or against a structure designed to accommodate them. Each machine shall be framed on the sides and top in rough-hewn wood or other period appropriate materials compatible with the adjacent building it is placed against. Vending machines should not occupy more than ten percent (10%) of the length, maximum twenty (20) feet, of any wall facing a street or access road. They should not obstruct private pedestrian walkways. A minimum of forty- four (44) inches shall be kept clear of obstruction. Additional space may be needed if pedestrian traffic volume warrants. . . . IV - 31 . Vending machines are not allowed on the public right ofway. . 3. Residential Site Planning Guidelines Design guidelines for the site planning of multiple family dwellings are intended to restore the presence of dwellings along streets and to expand upon standard subdivision regulations to maintain a village atmosphere (particularly along Pujol Street) and create an aesthetic environment with traditional neighborhoods. Detached residential structures are expected to maintain the period appropriate street view but are allowed additional latitude in tenns of site design. While these guidelines are specifically intended to discourage the construction of residential streets continuously lined with repetitious facades, parking lots, and garage doors, they do not limit the accessibility of dwellings by cars or reduce parking requirements. The following guidelines and illustrations show several alternatives for residential site planning which can be used to implement a new rural village concept for Old Town. Guideline 1 - Varv Multi-Familv Building Footprints Buildings should be designed to minimize the appearance of a large, single, rectangular mass and to provide intimate or human scale. Avoid long, unbroken facades and simple box fonns. To the extent possible, each of the dwelling units should be individually recognizable. This can be accomplished with the use of balconies, setbacks, and roofline changes. . DESlIlABlE JiUJll,r,<,',>,;.. RI.p,~~,,', RI,'.,",' 111,','.,' -"". ' - . 111, 111 tIJ , , , ',0 , cO , ~ NOT RECOMMENDED . . Old Town Specific Plan IV- 32 . . . Old Town Specific Plan Guideline 2 - Detached Accessory Buildin!!s . Detached accessory buildings located in residential districts shall incorporate architectural treatments from the main building including siding, surface materials, trim, paint colors and roofmaterials. Guideline 3 - Open Parkin!! and Carports . Cluster open parking and carports along internal private drives and behind residential structures. Incorporate tI1e following recommendations into parking plans: Open Parking: . . Should be screened from street view to tI1e extent possible. Every 10th space should be a landscaped island. Provide special paving at entries. . Carports: . Carport structure should be architecturally compatible with adjacent residential structures. Plain prefabricated metal carports are not allowed. Integrate carports with patio or building walls whenever possible. Single carport structures should be limited in length to 10 parking spaces. . . . Guideline 4 - Varied Front Yard Setbacks . For detached residential units, and un-stacked attached units, each group of three adjacent properties should contain at least one property whose front yard setback differs from tI1ose of its neighbors by at least 7 feet. Minimum setbacks should not be reduced to accommodate this variation. Provide Varied Front Yard Setbacks IV - 33 Guideline 5 - Gara!!e Location . . In older neighborhoods it is appropriate to locate the garage to the rear of the property. New infill projects should respect this traditional site planning concept whenever possible. Guideline 6 - Fences and Garden Walls . Residential areas should limit ITont yard fencing to materials compatible with the principal dwelling or multi-unit residential building and surrounding development. Simple wrought iron, cast iron, welded steel and substantial wood pickets painted a light color are options. . . Old Town Specific Plan IV.34 . . . D. PARKING LOT GUIDELINES The public view of open paved parking lots can detract ITom or obscure the historic theme ofthe Old Town area. This is especially important in the Retail Core area. The textures of paving can guide activities and movement patterns; it can channel traffic or prevent it ¡¡-om encroaching on specific areas; it can speed movement or slow it down. Smooth surface materials encourage walking while rough surfaces slow or inhibit walking. Paving materials therefore influence usability and comfort, as well as the perception of a historic time period. Guideline 1 - Parkin!! Lot Orientation . Parking lot location and orientation should be hidden ITom public view ITom Old Town Front and Main Streets. Parking lots and/or structures should be located, as much as possible, to the rear of buildings. Vehicular entry points to parking lots should receive special paving accents where the drive crosses the public sidewalk. Off-street parking facilities should be designed so that a car within a facility will not have to enter a street to move ITom one location to any other location within the same parking facility. . . . Guideline 2 - Joint Parkin!! Facilities Encoura!!ed . Shared parking between adjacent businesses and/or developments is strongly encouraged where practical. Common driveways that provide vehicular access to more than one site are strongly encouraged. Where parking areas are connected, interior circulation should allow for a similar direction of travel and parking bays in all areas to reduce conflict at points of connection. . . Old Town Specific Plan IV- 35 Guideline 3 - Parkin!! Lot Desi!!n . . Parking areas should be designed to enhance the Old Town historic environment. . Parking areas must be landscaped in compliance with the requirements of the Development Code. Parking areas should be separated from buildings by either a raised boardwalk walkway or landscaped strip, preferably both. Parking spaces which directly abut the building are strongly discouraged. Parking lots should be designed so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving cars. Minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles. A void locating trash enclosures and other obstructions in parking areas or places where they block the line-of-sight for motorists. . . . Guideline 4 - Site AccessfDrivewav . Entry driveways to parking lots in Old Town should be designed to enhance the Old Town historic environment. Properties should avoid parking access points taken directly from Old Town Front or Main Streets whenever possible. . . Whenever possible, locate site entries on alleys in order to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. When this is not possible design the front site entry with an appropriately patterned concrete or pavers to differentiate it ITom the sidewalkslboardwalk. Parking access points, whether located on front or side streets should be located as far as possible from street intersections. The minimum distance recommended is 100 feet. . . . Common driveways that provide access to more than one site are strongly encouraged. . Old Town Specific Plan IV - 36 . . . E. LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES Landscaping in the Old Town Specific Plan Area shall achieve three specific ends: 1) to unify and establish an Old West theme; 2) to soften commercial development; and 3) to unify the area as a pleasant environment for residents and visitors. These three ends will be accomplished by a highly recognizable use of repeated planting treatments. Consistency and continuity within the street right-of-way and building setback areas is extremely important. New development in Old Town shall comply with the following landscape guidelines and the regulations of this Specific Plan. Guideline 1 - General Landscave Guidelines All development should follow these general landscape guidelines: . Emphasize use of varieties which require low maintenance and drought tolerant species in public and commercial areas, especially in large landscape areas. Tree s pacing a long all streets and trails should b e more informal with an uneven spacing. Use boxed and potted plants in clay or wood containers, especially for enhancement of sidewalk shops. . . . Use color plantings at the base of a building, in planter boxes, and focal points. Landscaping material is the preferred method used to obscure the view of any parking, storage areas, trash enclosures, and public utilities ITom a public street or pedestrian area. . . Landscaping should not obstruct the sightlines of motorists or pedestrians, especially at pedestrian crosswalks. Trees and shrubbery should not bel ocated sot hat they interfere with the effectiveness of parking lot and street lighting. Landscape screen plant materials should be large enough at planting to provide effective screening, and be capable of growing to the height and density desired within a reasonable period of time. Provide complete automatic sprinkler or drip irrigation systems for all commercial projects in accordance with citywide water efficient irrigation requirements. . . . Old Town Specific Plan IV - 37 . Guideline 2 - General Landscape Material Guidelines All development should follow these general landscape material guidelines: . . Use specimen trees (boxed trees) for immediate effect and accent. Give consideration to rapidly growing trees. Give preference to ground covers which require little maintenance. Authentic flower and vegetable gardens may be developed to add to the historic character. Vines and climbing plants integrated upon building and perimeter garden and building walls are strongly encouraged. A few plants to consider for this purpose are bougainvillea, grape ivy, and wisteria vines. . . . . The use of materials such as crushed rock, redwood bark chips, pebbles, and stone or masonry slabs should not be used in place of live plant materials in landscape areas. . Old Town Specific Plan IV- 38 . Guideline 3 - Minimum Plant Size and SDacinl!: . A minimum of one 15 gallon size tree (25 feet in height or more at maturity) for every 800 square feet oflandscaping. A minimum of one shrub or vine for every 50 square feet of landscaping. . Guideline 4 - Save Mature Oak Trees in Old Town . Save existing mature trees, where possible, especially Oak Trees (small trees may be moved and transplanted). Approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness must be obtained for removal of all trees having a trunk diameter of 10 inches or more measured 48 inches above existing grade. Guideline 5 - Preferred Old Town Trees The following lists the recommended alternative species for landscaping private property in Old Town. Other drought tolerant, low maintenance native species may be presented and approved by the City staff. The following trees are selected for their shade potential, color, height, and/or form: . Sycamore; . . Liquidamber; . Evergreen Pear; . California Pepper; . Red Gum Eucalyptus; . Poplar; . Pinus; and . Oak. . Old Town Specific Plan IV - 39 F. LIGHTING GUIDELINES . The public sidewalks, places and alleys, exteriors, roofs, outer walls and fences of buildings and other structures and signs visible ITom any public street, place or position in the Old Town shall not be illwninated by any other illwnination except as pennitted herein; Guideline 1 - General Liehtine Guidelines The following general lighting guidelines shall be followed in Old Town: . . Building or roof outline tube lighting is not appropriate. Use oflwninescent wall surfaces is not appropriate. A limited nwnber of lights can be used to create shadow, relief or outline effects when such lighting is concealed or indirect. Concealed light sources are recommended. It is encouraged that interior building lighting be left on at night to enhance pedestrian activity on the street. The lighting system should be architecturally compatible with the surrounding building and express the unique historic character of the area. Mercury vapor, exposed fluorescent, or exposed high intensity lights are not pennitted. When full color recognition is needed, high pressure sodiwn lights should be used in public spaces. . . . . . . . Neon is not pennitted in the Tourist Retail Core and Tourist Serving Residential Land Use Planning Districts. . Old Town Specific Plan IV- 40 . . . G. PUBLIC ART GUIDELINES The placement of public art within the Old Town Specific Plan Area is encouraged on both private and public property. Public art gives a community an identity that can be representative of a City's culture and heritage in addition to promoting social gathering places and interaction. Wall murals, lighting displays, sculptures, mosaics, monuments and fountains are all considered significant examples of artistic expression. Proposals for public art are subject to review by the Old Town Local Review Board and must comply with the following guidelines. Guideline 1 - Location . Public art should be situated in highly visible places throughout the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. Public art is encouraged in all gathering areas. Locations such as pocket parks or specifically designed settings to accommodate particular art pieces are ideal. Old Town Specific Plan IV - 41 Guideline 2 - Symbolic Content . . Examples of public art in Old Town should relate to and represent the rich legacy of the Temecula Valley. Literal and abstract representations of local historical and old western elements are appropriate. . . Old Town Specific Plan IV - 42 . . . Guideline 3 -Mosaics and Murals . The pictorial designs of these artistic works should compliment the color and architectural composition of the buildings on which they are painted as well as that of adjacent structures. Ideal facades for murals are exposed fire or windowless walls that are two or more floors in height. Guideline 4 - Sculptures and Monuments . Pieces selected should be representative of historical figures and events related to the Temecula Valley. Employment of iron, rough-hewn wood and native rock materials are desirable as a part of the presentation. t"."":':" .. .' ":?" .r . , , ", , . :;¿. . Old Town Specific Plan IV - 43 Guideline 5 - Lil!htinl! Displays . . Lighting used as an artistic display should employ the same standards as fountains and use turn-of-the-century genre fixtures. They can also be constructed with works of sculpture, monuments and water features. Guideline 6 - Fountains . Water features in the fonn of above or below-ground fountains should enhance the surrounding architecture and, as historically appropriate, utilize materials from the Western, Monterey, SpanishlColonial/Mission and other period- appropriate styles represented in the Architectural Style Guidelines (Section IV -B) of this Specific Plan. They are also recommended for open courtyard and passage spaces to provide relief in hot weather . . Old Town Specific Plan IV - 44 . H. OUTDOOR DINING/SIDEWALK FURNITURE GUIDELINES Outdoor patio furniture and umbrellas used with restaurants and other commercial uses within the Old Town Specific Plan are considered an integral part of the street scene. As a result, period-appropriate street side furnishings as outlined in the following guidelines are required. . . . . . . . . Guideline 1 - Furniture . All outdoor furniture (tables, chairs, serving stands and bars) shall be of high- quality, durable, and suitable for outdoor use. Wood, metal and natural looking materials are encouraged. Outdoor furniture should be in scale and consistent with both the architectural style and colors of the adjacent building facade. . Guideline 2 - Umbrellas Umbrellas shall be made of high quality canvas material (not plastic, vinyl or aluminum) and be tall enough to allow pedestrian access. Umbrella colors should be monotones selected from the Sherwin-Williams Preservation Palette and be coordinated with the paint and architecture of adjacent buildings. Multi-colored designs are to be avoided. No signs or other types of advertising shall be printed on umbrellas, except for the name of the establishment on the umbrella valance. Umbrellas should be traditional market style designs that integrate well with adjacent building architecture. Wood and metal multi-post canopy structures used with fabric umbrellas are pennitted where historically appropriate. Review by the Old Town Local Review Board is required for these installations. Aluminum easy-ups are prohibited except where used in conjunction with an approved special event. Old Town Specific Plan IV-45 I. PAVING MATERIAL GUIDELINES . Paving materials that reflect the historic materials used in the nineteenth century are strongly encouraged in the Specific Plan area wherever possible. Guideline 1 - Suitable Material Guidelines . . Beige concrete with mexican beach pebble aggregate (1/2" - 1 ") surface; Stamped concrete boards, deep gray; or Red Clay tile (12" x 12") in areas of low pedestrian and automobile traffic; Textured, stamped concrete that is Terra Cotta with off white grout (to resemble tile); Stamped concrete cobbles deep grey in color; Brick or brick pavers in reds or browns; and . . . . . Wooden planks (sidewalks and footpaths). . Guideline 2 - Limit Pavinl! Choice in Each Project . . Limit the number of paving materials and patterns used in one place Driveway entries should be different pavement than sidewalk or street pavement. Vast expanses of concrete or asphalt, as in parking lots, are discouraged and should be modified with differing colors and paving patterns. . . Old Town Specific Plan IV-46 . . . J. SIGN DESIGN GUIDELINES Signs in Old Town should advertise a place of business or provide directions and information. Signs should be architecturally attractive and signs such as painted wall signs should contribute to the retention or restoration of the historic character of the area. Signs should not compete with each other or dominate the setting via inconsistent height, size, shape, number, color, lighting, or movement. An effective sign and graphics system functions not as a separate entity but as an integral part of the built environment. When carefully planned, signs communicate essential information, while ordering and enhancing the architectural character of Old Town. This Specific Plan has regulations to help control the size, location, and number of storeftont signs, but code restrictions above may not be enough. Design criteria are needed to encourage and coordinate well-designed signs. The following sign guidelines are also intended to assure the local merchant that all other Old Town commercial establishments are similarly regulated. Guideline 1 - General Desi2n Guidelines . . Provide a clear message on the sign. Use a brief message. The fewer the words, the more effective the sign. A sign with a brief, succinct message is simpler and faster to read, looks cleaner and is more attractive. . Avoid hard to read, overly intricate typefaces. These typefaces are difficult to read and reduce the sign's ability to communicate. Avoid faddish and bizarre typefaces. Utilize western style typefaces that are easy to read. . F M . ]J;fI1t~ tr~ Åt~.~.JJ Utilize sImple serif or son serif olphabef Avoid corny alphabe's. DIsèøurage typetaces which are hard to read . Avoid signs with strange shapes. Signs that are unnecessarily narrow, oddly shaped, or unrelated to the products or services being provided on site can restrict the legibility of the message. If an unusual shape is not symbolic, it is probably confusing. Old Town Specific Plan IV- 47 . . Use widely recognized logo's rather than print/text whenever possible. Make signs smaller if they are oriented to pedestrians. The pedestrian-oriented sign is usually read from a distance of fifteen to twenty feet; the vehicle- oriented sign is viewed from a much greater distance. The closer a sign's viewing distance, the smaller that sign need be. Signs with phone numbers are not permitted. This can clutter and obscure the main message. . . Guideline 2 - Sil!n Materials . . Signs made of carved or sandblasted wood. Yertical or horizontal wooden signs can be effectively utilized in a variety of different ways on windows, building surfaces or as accent bands. A wooden wall sign can be painted or stained and sealed for a more natural look, depending upon the appearance of the surrounding structures. Lettering can consist of metal or raised wood and when placed within a sign band, will serve to unify the building facade. Carved or sandblasted wood signs are also appropriate. Guideliue 3 - Sil!D Color . . . Sign colors and materials should be elements that were available in the 1890'S. Colors should be selected to contribute to legibility and design integrity. Even the most carefully thought out sign may be unattractive and a poor communicator because of poor color selection. Use significant contrast between the background and letter or symbol colors. If there is little contrast between the brightness or hue of the message of a sign and its background, it will be difficult to read. Limit major colors to four on a single sign, except for logos. Too many colors overwhelm the basic function of communication. The colors compete with content for the viewer's attention. Limited use ofthe accent colors can increase legibility, while large areas of competing colors tend to confuse and disturb. Where pictorial artwork is used in a design, multiple colors may be used for that portion of the sign. Metal sign panels can utilize raised lettering on metal bands. Printing and lettering can also be applied directly to a flat metal sign band with letters consisting of wood, acrylic or metal. Colors used in registered corporate logos and trademarks should be matched to the closest tones ofthe Sherwin-Williams preservation Palette when possible. . . . . . . Old Town Specific Plan IV- 48 . . . Guideline 4 - Sil!u Letter Size Guideline . Sign lettering for storefront wall mounted signs should be large enough to read, however, they should not overpower the scale of the storefront. Sign lettering should meet the following size recommendations: For storefronts 30' wide or less, a maximum letter height of 8" is recommended; For storefronts 30' to 60' wide, a maximum letter height of 12" is recommended; For storefronts greater than 60' wide, a maximum letter height of 16" is recommended. Guideline 5 - Sil!n Architectural Compatibility . . Sign design should relate to and enhance building architecture. Sign size should be proportionate. The size and shape of a sign should be proportionate with the scale of the structure. Place signs consistent with the proportions of scale of building elements within the facade. Within a building facade, the sign may be placed in different areas. A particular sign may fit well on a plain wall area, but would overpower the finer scale and proportion of the lower storeÍÌ'ont. A sign appropriate near the building entry may look tiny and out of place above the ground level. Place wall signs to establish facade rhythm, scale and proportion where facade rhythm doesn't exist. In many buildings that have a monolithic or plain facade, signs can establish or continue appropriate design rhythm, scale, and proportion. As an alternative to an attached sign, lettering may be painted directly on the building facade. This method resembles a wooden or metal band but does not require the introduction of another material. . . . RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED Sign Is In scale and character with buRdlng. SIgn Is out at scale and character with building. Old Town Specific Plan IV-49 Guideline 6 - Wall Mounted Siens . . Sign colors should be compatible with the building's color and the building. The identification of each building or store's address in six inch high numbers over the main entry doorway or within ten feet of the main entry is recommended. . Additional smaller building signs containing the name of the business should be located at rear entrances when they are routinely used by customers. Old Town Specific Plan IV-50 . . . . . . K STREETS CAPE GUIDELINES This Section contains guidance on the anticipated streetscape improvements as well as the requirements for street furniture and other streetscape elements. The dominant elements of the streetscape for Old Town will be street/sidewalk hardscape, building signage and street furniture. The purpose of streetscape improvements for Old Town is to promote a high quality historic image that serves to enhance the visual experience of the area for tourists and residents a like. T he preservation 0 fthe pedestrian scale and the relationship 0 f buildings to streets are important criteria in the Old Town area. The initial streetscape improvements along Old Town Front Street and a portion of Main Street were completed in November 1998. An environment oriented to the pedestrian should be concerned with meeting not only functional needs, but also sensory needs throughout the provision of a network of simple, well-defined and well-proportioned outdoor spaces. In an effort to ensure a 1900-era experience, it is important not to over-plan the streetscape as turn of the century streetscapes were often simple, uncluttered, and less fonnal than contemporary streetscape programs. In addition, fonnalized street trees were not a major component ofturn of the century streetscapes. 1. Sidewalk Concept The preferred Sidewalk Concept for Old Town consists of a two-tiered system. The first tier of the system is the public sidewalk. The second tier of the system is privately owned, covered porches, and arcades and is commonly described as the "browsing zone." a. The first tier, public sidewalk, which is located directly adjacent to the curb, should be a minimum of 8 feet wide. However, a wider width preferred, especially in areas where no second tier walkway is available. Wider widths are desirable. . The sidewalks shall be constructed of wood planks. The plank widths should vary in a random arrangement of 6", 8", and 10". The plank sidewalks shall be flush with the top ofthe curbs. Concrete handicapped ramps will often be necessary at corners. . Rolled curbs are recommended to provide an economical and softer alternative edge treatment. The curb and gutter should match the street paving materials. Old Town Specific Plan IV - 51 b. The second tier of the system is privately owned, covered porches, and arcades. This second tier is referred to as the "browsing zone." . The browsing zone shall be directly adjacent to and parallel to the public sidewalk and is recommended to be a minimum of8 feet wide. Widths up to 12 feet may be appropriate if seating areas are provided. . The height (elevation) of the porch/boardwalk shall not be greater than 12 inches above the adjacent sidewalk, unless greater heights are required because of its flood plane location. . The porch should be open and accessible at both ends to allow continuous pedestrian browsing from one storefront to the next storefront. . While porch railings are discouraged between the public boardwalk and the storefront, they may be allowed, provided an entry/exit to the public boardwalk is included about every 25 feet. 2. Street Tree Approach In keeping with the Specific Plan goal of not fonnalizing the Old Town streetscape into a regimented design concept, street trees should be located to achieve a sense of "planned randomness." This approach is accomplished through actual in-the-field analysis since tree locations are not predetennined by a static fonnula (e.g. all trees 30 feet on center). No more than two ofthe same type tree should be planted next to one another. Distance between trees may vary between 20 to 40 feet, or more if necessary to avoid driveways and utilities. Old Town Specific Plan IV-52 . . . . . . 3. Public Signage Public signage is an essential and integrated design element of the total Old Town environment. A carefully executed public sign program for Old Town can communicate vital information, reduce traffic congestion, boost retail sales as well as enhancing the architectural environment. For all public signage in Old Town, the Old Town district logo should be incorporated into the sign. The concept for public signage in Old Town is a three-tiered approach. The three tiers are Gateway Entry Signs, Public Parking Directional Signs, and Street Name Signs. a. Gateway Entry The original plan envisioned a gateway sign at each end of Old Town Front Street over the traffic lanes. To announce the visitors arrival in the core of Old Town. The materials should recall the architectural image of Old Town and may include sandblasted wood, and wrought iron. This vital public signage component was completed in February 1999. Old Town Specific Plan IV- 53 b. Parking Directional Signs . Parking directional signs will be located primarily along Old Town Front Street at intersections with side streets where public parking access i sa vailable. Other side street locations may also be appropriate at or near the parking lot. The signs will be tree standing and made of architecturally compatible materials. Illumination should be provided. An example of parking directional sign is shown below. . c. Street Name Signs These signs will be simple wood construction similar to the existing wood signs currently located in Old Town. Old Town's logo may be incorporated into the street name placard or pole. These signs will replace older street name signage in the public right-of-way. Generic directional signs may be added to the existing street name poles provided that specific business names are not mentioned. . Old Town Specific Plan IV - 54 . . . 4. Street Furniture Street furnishing can enliven and provide variety to outdoor spaces used by the public. Street furnishings serve an aesthetic as well as utilitarian function. Proper design and placement of such amenities will reinforce the Old West design theme and create a lively and festive atmosphere throughout the year in Old Town. The purpose of this discussion is to provide guidance on the materials and appearance for all street furniture within the Specific Plan. a. Wood Benches Wooden benches with vertical back slats and horizontal seat slats are preferred. Pressure treated Pine may be selected for an economical approach while Purple Heart wood is the perfect material for heavy use areas. Old Town Specific Plan IV - 55 b. Street Lighting . Street lighting in small rural towns in the nineteenth century was often non existent for communities like Temecula. In order to enhance pedestrian safety at night however, pedestrian level lighting is recommended. The previously existing lighting in Old Town is the single acorn on a concrete pole typical of the 1930's - 1940's. This style is incorrect for this tum-of-the-century period being sought for Old Town. The preferred street lighting in Old Town is a simple lantern style of light fixture. The typical standard applicable in most situations will be a double posted pole. This style is required in the Tourist Retail Core and Tourist Serving Residential zoning districts. . b. Trash Receptacles Trash receptacles should resemble either a whiskey barrel or crate or box in order to maintain the desired western style. . Old Town Specific Plan IV- 56 . . . c. Newspaper Racks All newspaper racks located with the boundaries of the Old Town Specific Plan, except for the Highway Tourist Planning Area, that are installed after the effective date of the Specific Plan shall either be constructed of rough-hewn wood stained dark or painted with a neutral color selected from the Sherwin- Williams Preservation Palette, or surrounded by a similarly constructed wooden facade. In order to maintain an uncluttered streetscape, newspaper racks should be placed adjacent to buildings and painted or stained with compatible colors. The design of the newspaper racks and facades must be hannonious with the Turn-of-the-Century look. Newspaper racks shall not located in locations that block emergency access, crosswalk entrances, handicapped access facilities, and store entrances. . Lengthy concentrations of newspaper racks is discouraged to m¡mm¡ze obstacles to pedestrian movement. The number of individual newspaper dispenser in each rack should not exceed four. Old Town Specific Plan IV- 57 d. Mailboxes . Mailboxes in Old Town should retain the rural delivery flavor ofthe mailbox rack system shown below for a multi tenant situation. Material should be dark stained wood. <' e. Bus Shelters While there will not be very many bus shelters in Old Town, the design should be compatible with the Turn of the Century look. Bus shelters should be custom designed and made primarily of wood. Color should be dark natural stain, white, or dark green. Metal and plexiglass contemporary designs are not allowed. . . Old Town Specific Plan IV-58 . . . f. Other "Period" Furnishings Many other streetscape furniture items make up the total streetscene. These items, in order to match the "period" style desirable for Old Town, will need to be custom designed and built. These items may include: . Phone booths; . Drinking fountains; . Fire hydrants; . Utility poles; or . Antique traffic signals. Old Town Specific Plan IV- 59 . . . V. OLD TOWN HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICT CONTENTS A. Purpose B. Establishment of the District C. Building Permits and Prohibitions D. Old Town Local Review Board (OTLRB) E. Old Town Local Historic Register F. Certificate of Historic Appropriateness G. Care and Maintenance H. Additional Violation Provisions for Historic Structures A. PURPOSE Page V-l Page V-l Page V-l Page V-2 Page V-3 Page V-6 Page V-8 Page V-9 Protecting the cultural heritage and historical architectural resources found in Old Town is part of the overall goal for the revitalization of Old T own and the protection 0 fthe community's heritage. The Old Town Specific Plan also gives owners of eligible historic properties relief from the contemporary municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws levied on newer contemporary structures. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT The boundary ofthe Old Town Historic Preservation District shall be coterminous with the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan. C. BUILDING PERMITS AND PROHIBITIONS Within the boundaries ofthe Old Town Historic Preservation District no person shall demolish, remove, relocate, alter, cause to be altered, or modifY any designated historic building or structure without the issuance of a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness. 1. Within the boundaries of the Old Town Historic Preservation District, no person shall alter, or cause to be altered, any designated historic building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with the issuance of a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness. 2. Within the boundaries of the Old Town Historic Preservation District, no person shall relocate, or cause to be relocated, alter, or cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be constructed, any building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with the issuance of a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness. 3. Old Town Specific Plan Vol 4. Within the boundaries of the Old Town Historic Preservation District, no building permit shall be issued unless a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness is first issued in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. . 5. Interior building changes to non-historic building and structures that do not effect the buildings exterior are not required to obtain a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness. 6. Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to exempt any person fÌom complying with any other provision oflaw. D. OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD (OTLRB) 1. The Old Town Historic Preservation District shall have an advisory review board known as the Old Town Local Review Board to provide input into all major projects within the Old Town Specific Plan. The Director of Planning may also provide the Board with information on major projects adjacent to Old Town that may have the potential to effect the Old Town area. 2. The Old Town Local Review Board shall be composed of five members and one alternate (who shall serve in the absence of any member). Board members shall be appointed by the City Council for terms of 3 years. The member terms shall be staggered so that all the member of the Old Town Local Review Board are not appointed at the same time. All members shall exhibit an interest in and knowledge of the history and architecture of the Old Town Historic Preservation District. At least one member shall be knowledgeable in architectural and construction techniques. Members shall serve without pay. . 3. The Old Town Local Review Board shall hold regular public meetings and establish such rules as may be appropriate or necessary for the orderly conduct of its business. Three members shall constitute a quorum. At its first meeting of the year, the Board members shall elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman (who will officiate the meetings when the Chairman is absent), who shall serve for terms of one year. 4. The Old Town Local Review Board shall have the following powers and duties in addition to those otherwise provided in this ordinance: a. Provide for pre-application conferences with individuals interested in constructing or altering property within the Old Town Historic Preservation District. The purpose ofthese conferences shall be to familiarize the applicant with the historic significance and related architectural themes ofthe district. b. Utilize the adopted Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines in the review of applications as part 0 fprocess to make determinations of consistency and appropriateness with the specific plan. Use the Design Guidelines as a basis for approving or denying applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness. . Old Town Specific Plan V-2 . . . c. Explore means for the protection, retention, and use of any significant structures, natural features, sites, and areas in the district including but not limited to appropriate legislation and financing by independent funding organizations, or other private, local, state, or federal assistance. d. Serve as an advisory resource to all agencies of the City in matters pertaining to the Historic District, and to encourage efforts by, and cooperation with individuals, private organizations, and other governmental agencies concerned with preservation of the district's architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage. e. Render advice and guidance, upon request of the property owner or occupant regarding construction, restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping, or maintenance of any structure, natural feature, site or area within the district. f. Encourage public understanding and appreciation of the unique architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage of the district through educational and interpretative programs. E. OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOCAL HISTORIC REGISTER 1. 2. The City Council has identified the following historic buildings and structures in the Old Town area. These building and structures are officially designated on the Local Historic Register for the City of Temecula. All buildings on this list are eligible to receive any and all benefits authorized by the State of California for designated historic structures. The use of the Historic Building Code is specifically authorized. The list of Designated Historic Buildings and Structures is as follows. The locations of the designated historic buildings and structures are also shown on Exhibit V-I. A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. Saint Catherine's Church, 1920 Welty Building, 1897 Machado Store, 1910 Clogstone Restaurant, 1932 First National Bank, 1914 Palomar Hotel, 1915 Alec Escallier House, 1927-28 Burnham Store, 1902 Friedeman Meat Market, 1901 WeltyHotel,1891 J.D. Welty, 1936 Arviso House, 1920 Delgado House, 1920 Unnamed residence, 1928 28314 Mercedes Street 28659 Old Town Front Street 28656 Old Town Front Street 28676 Old Town Front Street 28645 Old Town Front Street 28522 Old Town Front Street 41852 Main Street 42051 Main Street 42050 Main Street 42100 Main Street 42081 3rd Street 41915 4th Street 41878 4th Street 42251 6th Street Old Town Specific Plan V-3 3. O. P. Q. R. S. T. U. Bill Friedeman House, 1922 Nienke House, 1936 McConville House, early 1890's Albert Nienke House, early 1920's G.A. Burnham House, early 1880's Al Otto House, 1882 Fred Ramirez House, 1920 . 42291 6th Street 28575 Pujol Street 28585 Pujol Street 28649 Pujol Street 28653 Pujol Street 28717 Pujol Street 28725 Pujol Street Saint Catherine's Church building (Historic Building "A") was relocated to Sam Hicks Monument Park in 1992. The Bill Freideman House (Historic Building "0") was relocated on the same site in 2003 as part of housing project sponsored by the City Redevelopment Agency. Since the initial adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan, a number of previously designated historic structure were detennined to be substantially dilapidated and/or unsafe and it was detennined that these historic structures could not be rehabilitated. The following is a list of designated historic structures that were demolished since the Plan's initial adoption 1994. This listing has been provided for historic documentation purposes only. a. b. Hany Walters House, 1930's, 28535 Pujol Street Unnamed residence, 1920,28735 Pujol Street Knott's Garage, 1910,28545 Old Town Front Street Angel Ramirez House, 1926,28731 Pujol Street . Removed in 1996 Removed in 1999 Removed in 2000 Removed in 2002 c. d. . Old Town Specific Plan V-4 . . . Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Exhibit V-1 Historic Structures Map A. Saint Catherine's Church. 1920 B. Welty Bu;!dlng, '897 C. Machado Store, '910 D. Clogstone Restaurant. 1932 E. First National Bank, 1914 F. Palomar Hotel. 1915 G. Alec Eseallier House. 1927-28 H. Burnham Sto>o, 1902 I. Friedeman Meat Mar1<e~ 1901 J. Welty Hotel. 1891 K. J.D. Wetly, 1936 L. AMso House. 1920 M. Delgado House, 1920 N. Unnamed residence, 1928 O. Bill Fri_man House, 1922 P. Nienke House, 1936 Q. McConville House, early 1890's R. Albert Nlenke House, early 1920's S. GA Burnham House, early 1880's T. AI Otto House, 1882 U. Fred Ramirez House, 1920 28314 Mercedes Street 28659 Old Town Front Street 28656 Old Town Front Street 26676 Old Town Front Street 28645 Old Town Front Street 2S522 Old Town Front Street 41852 Main Street 42051 Main Street 42050 MaIn Street 42100 Main Street 42081 3" Street 419154thStreet 418784thStreet 42251 6th Street 42291 6th Street 28575 Pujol Street 28585 Pujol Street 28649 Pujol Street 28653 Pujol Street 28717 Pujol Street 28n5 Pujol Street "  N 400 400 800 Feet clgislOavid\arcvk>wprojoctsloldtown J _historic - "ructums."", F. CERTIFICATE OF HISTORIC APPROPRIATENESS . 1. No existing building or structure may be altered or demolished, and no new building or structure constructed without the prior approval of a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness pursuant to the provisions of this Section. 2. Certificates of Historic Appropriateness may be issued either by the Director of Planning or the Planning Commission or City Council as part of the approval process for any development within the Old Town Specific Plan. The determination of who approves the Certificate of Historical Appropriateness shall be based upon the approval authority established by the Development Code for t he accompanying application. No development application for Level Two projects in Old Town, as described below, may be approved without a recommendation from the Old Town Local Review Board. 3. For the purposes of implementing the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan there are two levels of Old Town development project. The first category is the ministerial or minor projects, referred to as Level One projects. The second category is for non- ministerial and major projects, also called Level Two projects. a. Level One Projects do not require the review and recommendation of the Old Town Local Review Board. Level One projects may be approved by administrative (staff only) review following the Director of Planning's determination to grant a Certificate of Historical Appropriateness. Typical examples include the following: . Interior changes or alterations to historic structures; Re-Iandscaping around existing structure; Re-roofing of an existing building; Additions and remodels to non-historic single family residences; Exterior architectural modifications to an existing commercial, office, or residential building effecting less than 25% of the front or street side exterior facade; The demolition to non-historic buildings and structures; New signs up to 12 square feet in size; and Changes in the copy of previously approved signs. The Director of Planning, at their sole discretion, may forward Level One projects to the Old Town Local Review Board when unique circumstances, or the sensitivity of adjacent historic structures or land uses indicate the potential for an adverse aesthetic impact. . Old Town Specific Plan V-6 . . . b. Level Two Projects have the potential for significant aesthetic impacts. Level Two Projects shall always require review by the Old Town Local Review Board prior to action by the approving authority. Typical examples of Level Two projects include, but are not limited to, the following: Multi-family residential projects; New commercial and office projects; Exterior architectural modifications to an existing commercial, office, or residential building when 25% or more of the ftont or street side exterior facade is affected; The alteration to a designated historic structure; The demolition of, or substantial alteration to, a designated historic structure (requires Planning Commission approval); New signs over 12 square feet; Mini-monument signs located on architectural features that exceed the standard height requirement of four feet; and, The removal of a specimen oak tree with a 10 inches or greater trunk diameter. 4. All applications shall be filed on the forms and in a manner determined by the Director of Planning. Applications shall not be accepted unless they are accompanied by the appropriate filing fee and such information and drawings as may be required by the Director of Planning. All applications for Certificates of Historic Appropriateness shall be signed by either the owner of the property or a person authorized by the owner. All drawings shall be signed by the architect responsible for the design and must be in sufficient detail to show t he proposed design for the site. This includes the architectural design and elevations (including signs), proposed materials, textures and colors (including material samples), and the site layout (including all improvements affecting appearances, such as walls, walks, terraces, plantings, accessory buildings, signs, lights, and other similar elements). 5. Following the receipt of a complete application, the Director of Planning shall schedule a meeting ofthe Old Town Local Review Board within 60 days and provide the Board with a staff report, including a copy of the site plan and elevations. The Board shall review the application material and make a recommendation to approve or deny, with or without conditions, any requests for a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness to the approval authority designated by the Development Code. Old Town Specific Plan V-7 6. In considering applications for Certificates of Historic Appropriateness, the Old Town Local Review Board shall make the following findings: . a. That the proposed structure is in confonnance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city and is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. b. That the proposed structure is in confonnance with the requirements ofthe Old Town Specific Plan, including the goals, objectives and policies, and architectural guidelines and standards. c. In the event of the proposed demolition of a designated historic building or structure, the Board shall also be required to find that applicant has submitted substantial evidence that the structure is imminently dangerous or unsafe and that the structure can not be effectively repaired or retrofitted. 7. The expiration date for a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness shall be the same as expiration date for the accompanying planning application, as may be extended pursuant to the provisions of the Development Code. If the Development Code does not specifY an expiration date, the project which the Certificates of Historic Appropriateness was approved shall commence construction within three years of the date of approval or the Certificate of Historic Appropriateness shall become null and void. No extensions oftime will be allowed for these projects. . G. MAINTENANCE AND CARE 1. The owner, occupant, or other person in actual charge of an building or structure on Old Town Temecula Local Historic Register shall keep in good repair all of the exterior portions of such improvement, building, or structure, all of the interior portions thereof when subject to control as specified in the designation statement, and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior architectural feature. 2. Nothing in the requirements of section shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior architectural feature in or on any designated Old Town Temecula Local Historic Register building of structure that does not involve a change in design, material, or external appearance thereof. . Old Town Specific Plan V-8 . . . H. ADDITIONAL VIOLATION PROVISIONS FOR HISTORIC STRUCTURES L In addition to the general violation provisions in Section ill.H. 7 of the Specific Plan, any person who demolishes, alters or removes a building or structure on the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Register, that person and the owner shall be required to restore the building, site, or structure to its original condition and setting prior to the violation within ninety days. Any action to enforce this provision may be brought by the city or any other interested party. This civil remedy shall be in addition to, any criminal prosecution and penalty and any other remedy provided by law 2. If any person demolishes or removes an building or structure on the Old Town Local Historic Register in violation of this section, no building or construction related (including grading) pennits or pennits to use the property as a parking area or other commercial venture shall be issued for a period of up to seven years, at the City Council's discretion, based 0 n the significance of the resource ITom the date of demolition, except to replicate the lost resource. The failure to adequately maintain a designated historic building or structure can also be considered to constitute the unauthorized demolition of a building or structure on the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Register. For the purpose of this section, the demolition shall be presumed to have occurred on the date the city has actual knowledge of the demolition. The owner shall have the burden of providing an earlier date, if entitlement to an earlier date is claimed. The owner shall have the affinnative obligations to plant grass, to provide a temporary irrigation system to maintain such landscaping and to prevent the accumulation of debris and waste on the property during the interim period. Old Town Specific Plan V-9 . ATTACHMENT NO.5 . REDLINEISTRIKEOUT OF SECTION 111- ZONING STANDARDS . R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPAO3-0158\Staff Repon PCI.dot 18 =:.::O~:C~;;:.~-::;¡¡i;¡¡:.-"""-;;:;,~- ., ."""'4 -='""C'" .;.'-.."'0,,,. "'-'~'~~"-J-.,..::';;:;";'¿-~;;:':'f--.'c_-,':":: . . . III. A. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INTRODUCTION The Old Town Specific Plan area is comprised of eil!:ht too land use districts. Each district establishes pennitted land uses and development standards which are intended to implement the goals and objectives of this Specific Plan (Section II) and the City's General Plan. Th~ß~ hUH! tlS~ œgNJatigHs !lfH! à~ elgpmmK stllHàarào ogHstitt¡t~ th~ pRm!lfj zoHiHg ]Jrg.isigHS fßr th~ Olà Tg..H E]J~~iÍÌ~ PISH ar~a. Th~s~ r~gtllatigHs aHà stllHàllfàs are iH aààitigH to th~ ~--o!ltD~. ~lgpmo!lt Cgà~]JTO isigRs. '.vhBr~ th~ro is a ogHHiot BOt' O~H th~ r~galatigns of tho D~. olB]Jmont Cgà~ 81!à this £]JooiÍÌo Plan, tllB r~galatigRS prg. iàoàllOroin shall ]Jro ail. Wßor~ àireotigH is Hgt ]Jrg. ià~à iH 1his £]JoeiÍÌe Plan, th~ ]Jf8. isigns of Ilie ];)0 olgpm~Ht Cßàe shall ]Jr~. ail. ThB àB els]JmoHt staHàllfào o@!ltaiR~à koroiH ar~ minimüm r~¡¡tliromo!lts. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF LAND USE DISTRICTS AND MAP 1. Specific Plan Land Use Districts The following land use districts are hereby established within the Old Town Specific Plan area: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC) District Old Town Civic (OTC) District Tourist Retail Core (TRC) District Tho EkOßt all! (TEa) DistRot CgmIDWHt) Cg_~r~ial'TßllfÌst £äJJ]Jgr! (CCTE) ];)jOtR~t Community Commercial (CC) District Tourist Serving Residential (TSR) District Medium Density Residential (MDR) District High Density Residential (HDR) District Open Space (OS) District 2. Descriptions of Land Use Districts a. Highway Tourist Commercial The Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC) designation is intended to provide for those uses that are located adjacent to major transportation routes and may be oriented to the needs of tourists and recreation enthusiasts. Highway Tourist Commercial development should be located at appropriate locations, and developed as clusters of commercial development rather than as shallow commercial frontage along major streets. Typical uses may include tourist accommodations and lodging facilities, automobile service stations, restaurants, convenience stores, and gift shops. The facilities should be well Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document 2,Û8t8tl T-8;¡t Changes in text location are not shown III-I landscaped and provide an attractive visual image. . b. Old Town Civic The Old Town Civic (OTC) designation is intended to provide for public and quasi-public uses such as parks, city offices, police/fire stations, public day care centers, senior citizen centers, community centers, museums, and similar facilities. c. Tourist Retail Core The Tourist Retail Core (TRC) designation is intended to provide for those uses that support and compliment the pedestrian-oriented core tooFist slwppillg disMet. The designation typically includes small scale, boutique- type retail businesses. Service and office uses are allowed on either the second floor or on non-Old Town Front and non-Main Street parcels lillder speBial Bire_stallees BIll). Residential uses are only allowed as ancillary uses when located above the ground floor or in the rear of the lot. Tourist retail uses are generally small businesses occupying no more than 5,000 square feet. Typical uses may include gift shops, restaurants, small hotels, bed & breakfasts, mixed use, antique shops, small hardware/decorator stores, museums, art galleries, flower shops, jewelry shops, clothing shops, custom furniture items, and similar retail uses. . II The Shoot Olit ThB Shaat Ollt (TEa) àBsignatiall pra. iàes far a mrn. af ilie BellM) appfaaeß ta a "pBdesMan alll)" shappillg street. ThB street olild pre. iàB f@rmailll) Bmall t@IIRst seF ing r Btail shaps anti spBBialtj ReF'iss lises (1IIaeksmith, if8nsmith, artisan stHtiias) laeateti there. PeRad appf8pRate efHeeB ..iII lie sonsitiereti an the MfSt fleer. '.'el) spsBifis anti distinst ds slopmellt and lIfehitestuFal aRteRa . alild be ra!)lIireti in the Sh(lat Ollt tiesignatian. StarB 8ige8, llliiltiing heights, lises, anti tie. alapme!lt stantillftis .. elild all lie prepaI'8d .. ilh the Banoept af reereating an I g<;>9's Hain £trsst dirt sweet, hitehing pasts, .. atering walighs, raised IH lIfd Bide.. aYlB, areas for 8 Jscial e ellts ( estefR st)le shoot Olit, ete.). This ¡¡iatriet ar ¡; olliftg ¡¡eaigaatioll is tisBsFÎIIBti as a Aoatiøg \!lODe. FBr plil' JOSSS RBrB, thB fIaating gBnB mil) lis litiliged an) .. Rsrs ill the Talirist Retail CarB DisMst .o'hsrs uillgle de. elaper Ban asBBmiJls a minim 11m af 19,999 B!)lillfe fcet af sa!ltiglialls laRd. For the plll' Jases aftIllB rBg¡.¡latisn, all rel)liirBmcllts afthe TRC lIfea applj ta Ths Shaat Ollt Zane CJ[8Bpt .. herB spssifiaretj,lIiremaHts far Ths £haat Olit lems lIfe pre. idm!. J. Sheet Olit ¿anB dB':slepmsHt rBtj,liBst dees n(lt rBtj,ws a Bane eh:mgB er spceifie pl8iJ. amsnt!mBHt. It simp I) Ban lis liasd 8flj ..herB ill the Talirist Retail Cars Distriet ..hers a minimlim ef 19,91)1) sl)llafB feet (grass) af aàjaesnt land Ban lie assemllied. . Added Text III-2 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Pe'¡;t8ti 'F,ut Changes in text location are not shown . . . @. CommuBi~ Comm@r@ial'Touist Support The CemmllftÏt) Celrnl'wicial'Tomst Säf! leN (CCTS) ¡ esigtlatioft is imcftliell to Ire. ille a l@ss Iesm@t@1I mi¡¡ of I@Bill@m Bel" iftg retail 111'\11 eOft @rn@ftee sel"\ ieeB as .. ell as tourist retail 111'\11 se}? ise Nses. ThiB is the least rcBtfleti. @ commereial i'jOft@ SOfttaift@¡ ift the l.8Jul VBS Plan. f. Community Commercial The Community Commercial (CC) designation includes retail, professional office, and service-oriented businesses that serve the entire community. Community commercial areas typically include neighborhood commercial uses as well as larger retail uses including department stores, theaters, restaurants, professional and medical offices, and specialty retail stores. g. Tourist Serving Residential The Tourist Serving Residential (TSR) designation is intended to provide for the wide range of tourist serving overnight accommodations which include senior housing, bed & breakfasts, hotels, motels, motor courts, rental cottages, and hostels. Eating places would be allowed as accessory uses. Camping and RV. parks would not be allowed. h. Medium Density Residential The Medium Density Residential (MDR) designation (7 to 12 dwelling units per acre) is intended to provide for the development of attached and detached residential development. Typical housing types may include single family detached, single family zero lot line, patio homes, duplexes, townhouses, condominiums, garden apartments and conventional apartments. I. High Density Residential The High Density Residential (HDR) designation (13 to 20 dwelling units per acre) is intended to provide for the development of attached residential developments. Typical housing types may include townhouses, condominiums, garden apartments, and conventional apartments. j. Open Space The Open Space (OS) designation includes both public and private areas of permanent open space along the floodways of Murrieta Creek. This designation is intended to include lands acquired by exaction, easement, fee, and other methods sanctioned by State and Federal law for parkland, for preservation of biological and cultural resources, and for protecting public Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Deleted 'F8.¡t Changes in text location are not shown 111-3 safety fÌom flood hazards. Much of this area may have the Development Code Floodplain Overlay Zone associated with it. The Specific Plan Land Use Map (Exhibit 2) depicts the boundaries of each land use district within the Specific Plan area. 3. Land Use District Boundaries Where boundaries ofthe land use districts appear to follow streets, they shall follow the center lines of said streets. Where boundaries appear to follow existing property lines, they shall follow said property lines and shall not bisect portions of existing lots of record which are in effect at the time of adoption of this Specific Plan. The boundaries with the Open Space Land Use District alonl!: the channel of Murrieta Creek may bisect adjacent parcels. c. GENERAL PROVISIONS The following regulations apply within all land use districts in the Old Town Specific Plan area. 1. Other Applicable Codes and Codes All construction and development within the Specific Plan area shall comply with applicable provisions of the Unifonn Building Code and the various related mechanical, electrical, plumbing codes, and the Subdivision Code, as adopted by the City Council. In cases of a conflict between the provisions of any such code and this Specific Plan, the provision which most serves to protect health, safety, and welfare of the community shall apply and the Director shall resolve the conflict utilizing the Goals and Objectives ofthis Specific Plan. 2. "Direetor" Detilled "'non IlBed ill this S '!eeitio PI!UJ., the te- "Diroetor" Bhallllle!UJ. the Direeter of PIa¡ lIillg er 8!1. a '! '!eiftted re '!f8Befttati. e. J. "CemmiaBiell" Detilled '.'(hell tlBsd ill thia S '!eeitie Plm, the to- "ColllllliBaiell" shall mean the Temssilia PI8IJlillg Cemmissiell. 1. "Yeard" Detilled '.'.'hOIlIlB@d ill this S '!esitie PI8!1., the tom:¡ "Yaard" shall mom the Old Ta .:11 Laeal Re.ie.. Yeard(OT1.Im). 5. DetillitiallB Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document IhJ13tui T-8xt Changes in text location are not shown III - 4 . . . . . . For !In) . on! or 'IMaße ill this S¡Jeei.lie Plan IIeetiing a tle.lillitiel!, the tle.liIlitißII 'Ire. itletl il! the De. ele 'lm81!t Cetle ßRall !I J 'I!). 6. Resolution of Conflicts Between the Specific Plan and Development Code If an issue, condition, or situation arises that is not sufficiently provided for or is not clearly understandable, the regulations in the Development Code that are applicable for the most similar issue, condition or situation shall be used by the Director as guidelines to resolve the unclear issue, condition or situation. This provision shall not be used to permit uses, architectural styles, or procedures not specifically authorized by this Specific Plan or the Development Code. :. f .R1.8l!tlmeIltß TRiß S 'Ieei.lie Plan, il!elütlil!g the Llrntl Uße H!! 'I, mal Be arnel!tletl b) the same 'Ir8eetllife as it aß oRgiRalll affe 'ltetl. ~aeR 8..IRel!tlmeIlt sRall iRalüffe all ßeetioRß or 'IðJti€JRß eflRe £¡Jeei.lie Plan thai are affœtetl 8j tReeRange. Þ..IIameIlffm8Rt mal 8e illitialeff B) the Cit) CellIleil, Plæming Co_ißßiol! or ¡JR. ate 'Ire 'leJt) e ..Ref. Þ.-n) BlleR amel!tlm.mlt re€¡ü8Bt8t1 bj a fJfB 'Ie!'t) e ..I!er ma) be ß00388t to the fce ßeRetlüle atle 'lteff Bj the Citj Collll8il. 8. Violations It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this ordinance. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of an inftaction or misdemeanor as hereinafter specified. Such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any ofthe provisions ofthis ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted. Any person so convicted shall be, guilty of an inftaction offense and punished by a fine not exceeding $100.00 for a first violation; and guilty of an inftaction offense and punished by a fme not exceeding $200.00 for a second inftaction. A third and any additional violation shall constitute a misdemeanor offense and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 or 6 months in jail, or both. Notwithstanding the above, a first offense may be charged and prosecuted as a misdemeanor. Payment of any penalty herein shall not relieve a person from the responsibility for correcting any violation. 9. Land Use Determinations Whenever a particular type of land use has not been listed in Table ¡ it shall be the duty of the Director to determine ifthe unspecified said use is 1) consistent with the overall intent ofthe district in which the use is proposed; and 2) consistent with the other permitted or conditional uses in that district. The Director's determination Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document f) 8!8t€ti T.s ~I Changes in text location are not shown III-5 11. 12. 1]. shall be final. . 10. Nonconfonning Uses and Structures Where, at the time of passage ofthis Specific Plan, a lawful use ofland or structure exists which would not be pennitted by the regulations imposed by this Specific Plan, such use or structure may be continued indefinitely unless one of the following is involved: 0 If the nonconfonning use vacates the property and the nonconfonning use is not reestablished within one year, the use shall not be reestablished. 0 If a nonconfonning use voluntarily vacates the property after the year 2013 for any reason, a nonconfonning use shall not be reestablished. 0 V.qwre a lHøpeft) is IlnimpfB. ed ere eD!ailla a a mwture(. shiels a terage, material størage), the lIellesllfsrmillg lIae shall bü €Iisüølltim¡e€l and lJrsllgftt illte üellÍormit) ..ithill to ø :,eara. 0 If more than 50% of a nonconforming structure is damaged or destroyed, the nonconforming structure shall not be reestablished 0 If more than 25%. but less than 50%. of a nouconforming structure is damaged or destroyed, the structure may be replaced if the exterior of the repaired structure substantially conforms to the architectural standards contained in Section IV ofthis Specific Plan . Public RiclIt-of-Wav Encroaclunents In order to accomplish the overall design theme required by this Specific Plan, it may be appropriate to allow certain building accessories (e.g. awnings, trellises, stairs to porches, or projecting signs) to encroach into the public right-of-way. The Director may approve such encroaclunents under the Plot Plan approval process provided in the Development Code. Setback Area Encroaclunents gems ellümaehmüllt illte rüljllirü€l BetlJaelE areas mal lJe Adjustments to setback requirements of UP to 25% may be approved or conditionally approved by the Director if it can be demonstrated that the encroaclunent will enhance the overall appearance of the project or serve a particular useful function for the general public. Common examples of these ~ encroaclunents may include awnings, canopies, marquees, trellises, stairs, and other similar desirable architectural items. gitc Dc. ülsJjmeD! Rsglllatiell FlünilJilito, . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document IJ818t8tl T-e.ót Changes in text location are not shown III - 6 . . . 11. !.dj IIstments tB sellJaaJ¡ re€ lIirements ef II 'I te 25% mal he a 'l 'lfB . ed er a enditi onallj' R ! 'IfO. ad h) tha DiraatBr ätJ°n damBnstrati8n that tkB 'IrB 'IBsBd adjllstment ill hB 8eß1 !ati!Jle ith, and ill nBt 'Irs. a detrimBntal te, adjaaaIN 'IfO 'IB!'t) Br im 'lrs emBßts. DB. alB!Jmeßt Plan R a. ie .. ReatlÎfad NB htliIàiRg 'Ißrmit shall hß is8t1Bd for tha im !rB. ßmaIN ImdiBr BBR8tfttatiBR sf, ar additioR tB, an) hllildiRg, 8truaÍtlfs, Br 8ign .. ithiR ths b S ooli!!I'Îas of this SpBsiHa Plan wea ootil thB PlRl.niRg Ds 'lartm.snt has Hr8t maàe a HndiRg that the 'Irop osBd hiidiRg, s1roatufß, or sign is iR aBRfe_it') .. ith hoth the intent anli pre iBiBRs BftruB 8 '1eaiHa Plan anli tka CiÞ/8 De. alB 'ImeRt CBda. Tho Pffl. iBiBRs far A4Jpm. al J.tlthorit') shall hs as set fBrtk iR tke Ds. ala 'lment CBdB. 15. Loading Facilities Loading and unloading facilities shall be visually screened from access streets and adjacent properties and constructed in a manner to reasonably contain and restrict emission of noises typically attributed to such function. When screening ofloading and unloading facilities is physically not possible, the facilities shall be architecturally integrated into the overall design ofthe building. 18. lRstallatiBR 8fPuhlie ImJJrs. emeIN8 PFOjBBt da. ala 'lsfß arB rB8 !BRBibh for 'Irs. idißg adjaoeßt 'Ioolis impre. amaRts Bush as sllmB, guttar8, 8ids..alkB, straet lightiRg, 'Iarl".aj hrndBaa 'liRg, strsBt traaB, and ether 8imilar items in aaaBrdlmae . itk stlmdwlis e8mØiRed . ithiR this 8 '1aaiHa Pl!Iß at the tims 8fda. aIB 'Imant. F8rllte 'Itlf JOBe of this ra€ lIirameßt, "de. elepment" shall iRBluda tka ß¡¡ 'I1m8iBR Bftke e¡¡iBtiRg S€ UWß feetaga Bj 25% or mafS. 17. Exterior Lighting a. All exterior lighting fixtures shall comply with the requirements of the Mount Palomar Lighting District. b. All lighting of the building, landscaping, parking lot, or similar facilities, shall be so shielded and directed as to reflect away from adjoining properties. c. Security lighting fixtures are not to be substituted for parking lot or walkway lighting fixtures and are restricted to lighting loading, storage areas, and similar service locations. d- It is highly desirable and recommended for tenants and property owners to utilize low voltage "tivoli" or "dazzler" to decorate building facades. Blinking lights are discouraged. Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document E'e!eteti Text Changes in text location are not shown III-7 29. 21. 22. 23. 18. Minimum/Maximum Storefront Width . For purposes of regulating the development of, and the division of existing storefronts, no storefront facing a public street shall be less than 20 feet wide or more than 100 feet wide. 19. Minimum Commercial/Office Building Subdivision Size For purposes of regulating the permanent subdivision ofthe interior (floor to ceiling walls) of an existing storefront on the first floor, no building in the Specific Plan area shall create interior retail space intended for business purposes less than 500 gross square feet. Exceptions to this requirement include restrooms, storerooms. I;'g8i~ Rg ie E¡¡tel'Îer sesigtl re ie is re!tliirgs fer all lie . IHlÌlsillgs, as8itialla er m[ JlIIIsieIl8 er relle . atiellß. Yliilsillgs, assitialls, er eJ! Ja¡¡aiella .. high reslIlt ill the assitiell en 99 S£jllare feet ar mere effleer area 8ha1l Be slIDjeet te re.ie.. MS RJ1pre.al Bo the Plan.lÍlIg I;'sfHlI'tmell! aml/er the Ohl Te 'ft Leeal Re. ie' Years. The Years shall rede . 8igniiieant plM8 te ill8ure the;, are ill aeaersallee . ith tha sesigtl glliselillea aellt!IÍlles ill this 8peeiiie Plan. f.1!1'!re . al ans AJjJjeal hutl!el'ities . Fer JllffJe8es efthis 8peeiiie PIa¡¡, the !4! Jra. alms Appeal Atithal'ities Pre. isiena e[(h8 J;}e. 8lepm811t CeS8 shall appl). Vehicle Access Restricted Direct vehicle access shall not be allowed from a private property onto Front Street or Main Street (between Front Street and Murrieta Creek). Vehicular access from a private parking lot to Front Street or Main Street shall be to a side street or public parking areas. The Director 0 f Planning may allow exceptions will only be allowed in cases of landlocked property. Adaptive Re-use Parking Waiver In order to preserve historic or unique existing buildings in the Old Town Specific Plan area, additional off-street parking shall not be required for the use or intensification of use (not involving physical expansion beyond present exterior walls) for these buildings. These 25 buildings are identified in the Old Town Historic Preservation District Ordinance (III.F.7) . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document J)r¡i!€ld Tl!ut Changes in text location are not shown III - 8 . . . 24. 25. 26. Pujol Access Standards Due to the higher volume of anticipated traffic on Pujol Street, the following standards are provided: 0 Driveways on adjacent properties shall be placed as far from one another as possible; Only one driveway per Pujol frontage shall be allowed, except for emergency access, on lots with under 200' of Pujol frontage; Additional driveways shall only be allowed on lots with over 200' of Pujol fTontage; and Driveways on the same property shall be located at least 250' apart. 0 0 0 Parking Location Restricted Locating parking lots between the front property line and any building is prohibited. Roof Mounted Equipment All roof mounted equipment shall be screened in accordance with the requirements of the Development Code. Special consideration shall be given to the location and screening of noise generating equipment such as refiigeration units, air conditioning, and exhaust fans. Noise reducing screens and insulation may be required where such equipment has the potential to impact residential uses. #. Development Code Many provisions of the Development Code (Municipal Code) will continue to apply in the Old Town Specific Plan when they do not conflict, undermiue, or counteract the provisions ofthe Specific Plan. For purposes of consistency and clarity, special re!!nlations or standards that are not addressed in this Specific Plan will be used by the Director of PI ann in!! to !!nide and control development in the Old Town area. Examples of Develoument Code provisions that applv to development with Old Town include, but are not limited to, the followin!!: The Administration of Zonin!! - Chapter 17.03. as amended Permits - Chapter 17.04, as amended Development Plans - Chapter 17.05, as amended The Supplemental Development Standards - Chapter 17.1 0, as amended Off-Street Parkin!! and Loadin!! - Chapter 17.24, as amended The Water Efficient Landscape Desi!!n - Chapter 17.32, as amended The Telecommunications Facility and Antennas - Chapter 17.40, as amended Added Text III-9 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Pels/sd 'F-s;,/ Changes in text location are not shown it . Other S )ecial Re!!:ulations and Standards Exam )les of other codes and re!!:ulations that s )ecificallv a ) )lv to develo )ment within Old Town include, but are not limited to, the followin!!:: Adnlt Business Ordinance Mount Palomar Li!!:htin!!: Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance t1. Tem )orary Use Permits. Permits for tem )orary uses in the Old Town area shall conform with the )rovisions of Section 17.04.020 of the Temecula Munici )al Code exce )t that the outdoor dis )lav and sales of merchandise, customarily sold bv the )ermanent Old Town business, is limited to four events )er year. Each event is not to exceed four (4) consecutive days. #. Parkin!!: Requirements To minimize the amount ofland committed to )arkin!!: lots within the Old Town area, not all uses within the S )ecific Plan will be required to )rovide on site )arkin!!:. In most cases, the determination whether or not )arkin!!: will be required will be based u )on the Land Use District and the ty )e of business. When onsite )arkin!!: is required, the standards contained in Cha )ter 17.24 of the Temecula Munici )al Code will normally be used to determine the number of required )arkin!!: s )aces. The followin!!: is a list of Land Use District )arkin!!: requirements within the Old Town S )ecific Plan. . a Tourist Retail Core District - Onsite parkin!!: is required onlv for hotels, motels, and banks and financial institutions that are more than 1,250 square feet is size. (The )arkin!!: requirement for bed and breakfast establishments are contained in Section III.F.4.c ofthis S )ecific Plan.) 0 Community Commercial District - All uses shall )rovide onsite )arkin!!:. 0 Hi!!:hwav Tourist Commercial District - All uses shall )rovide onsite )arkin!!:. 0 Old Town Civic District - Onsite )arkin!!: should be )rovided when )ractical. a Tourist Servin!!: Residential District - On site parkin!!: is required only for hotels and motels. (The )arkin!!: requirement for bed and breakfast establishments are contained in Section III.F.4.c of this S )ecific Plan.) 0 Medium Density Residential District - All uses shall )rovide on site )arkin!!:. . 0 Hi!!:h Density Residential District - All uses shall )rovide onsite )arkin!!:. Added Text III - 10 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document J)3?el,,!/J Ts.¡t Changes in text location are not shown . . . 0 Open Space District - Onsite parkin!! should be provided when practical aud appropriate for the use. However, the Director may require assembly uses with hi!!h parkin!! demands to provide additional off-street parkin!!. In makin!! this determination the Director can consider the size and location of the proposed use, the hours of operation, the availability of nearby on- and off-street parkin!! resources, and its proximity to other assembly and restaurant uses. D. LAND USE REGULATIONS This section includes a matrix (Table I) which lists the land uses and indicates whether or not each use is pennitted (P), conditionally pennitted (C), or prohibited (-) in each ofthe ten land use districts within the Specific Plan area. When exceptions have been established, they are so noted at the end ofthe table. Pennitted uses for the Medium Density Residential (MDR) area, the High Density Residential (HDR) area, and the Open Space (OS) areas 1If8 88nt8Ïlle!Ì ill t118];)8 818jJment ~ shall be the same as identified in the Development Code for the Medium Densitv Residential, Hi!!h Densitv Residential and Open Space/Conservation zones, respectively, as periodically amended The Pennitted Use Matrix is proposed to receive a major change in fonnat to more closely match the Development Code. In addition to deleting a large number of duplicate land use descriptions and reorganizing the matrix, the following more substantial changes are also being proposed: Pennit "Self Service Car Wash" in the Community Commercial zone, Pennit "Gift Novelty, Souvenirs", "Ice Cream and Yogurt Shops/Soda Fountains", "Insurance, Brokers, and Services", "Luggage and Leather Goods", and "Real Estate Offices" in the Highway Tourist Commercial zone, Pennit "Laboratories, medical and dental" in the Tourist Retail Core, but only on non-Front and Main Street locations, Pennit "Wedding Chapel" in the Old Town Civic zone, Delete "Bicycle Rentals" fÌ'om the Old Town Civic zone, Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document RB!ØtBi Tßj¡t Changes in text location are not shown III-ll E. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS . This section contains the development standards tables for the Specific Plan. Table 111-2 contains the site and development standards for the Hi!!hwav Tourist Commercial illT), Community Commercial (CC). and Tourist Retail Core (TRC) Land Use Districts. Table 111-3 contains the site and development standards for the Tourist Servin!! Residential (TSR). Medium Densitv Residential (MDR). Hi!!h Densitv Residential (HDR), Old Town Civic (OTC), and the Open Space (OS) Land Use Districts. This seetian inehli!Bs to :B IRatR8Bs, TaM8:1 C8IDßlefBial Site DB. 8laj'lIReIN Standards and Toole 3 ResidentialrpaBliB Site DB. elaj'llRBIN Standards. Toole J in81ades the site de. BlBj'llRent standards fer the: 0 0 0 0 0 High .Ilj T€nlfÌst CeIDßlefBial (lITe) Distflet; Tmmst Retail Cafe (TRC) DisMet; The ShBat Ollt (ISO) DisMet EI'laating Zane); Camrnllftil) Ca_aI8ial'TaaRst SIlf!j'laR (CCTS) DisMel; and CeIRf!llrnil) CaIRIRefeial (CC) DisMel. TaBle 3 ineh¡des the site de. elaj'llRent standards fer the: . 0 0 0 0 0 T€JäFÌst Sef'. ing Resid8lHial (TSR) DisMet; Hediürn Delisi!) Residential (r IDR) Distriet, High Densit) Residential EIIDR) DiaMat; Olll Ta '11 Ci. ie (OTe) DisMat; anll O !all ~j'laaa (OS) DisMat. . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Pe!eted 'F::;"~t Changes in text location are not shown lI/-12 . TABLE ill-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN Commercial Develonment Standards HTC TRC ~ ~ CC Minimum Lot Area (sa. ft~n.w 10,000 3,500 4G,OOIì &,GOO 8,000 Max. Dwelling Units per Acre 0 Ii 46' G 0 Lot Dimensions 60 ft. 25 ft. G ~ 60 ft. Minimum Width at Required Front Setback Area Minimum Comer Lot Width 100 ft. 50 ft. G ~ 60 ft. Minimum Depth 80 ft. 80 ft. G ~ 80 ft. Min. Frontage at Front ProD. Line 80 ft. 25 ft. G ~ 60 ft. Setbacks 25 ft. 03 G' G' 03 Minimum Front Yard Maximum Front Yard N/A 10 ft.' ~. ~ 25 ft. ~ Comer Side Yard 10 ft. 0 G G 0 Interior Side Yard 0 0 G G 0 Rear Yard 10 ft. 0 ~ ~ 10 ft. Ace. Bid!!. On Interior Site Boundary 10 ft. 10 ft. G ~ 10 ft. Min. Building Separation 0 0 G G 0 Maximum StorieslHeight 3/4G~ m& ~ ~ 2/30 ft. ft. 3/50 ft. Max. % Lot Coverage 70% 100% ~ ~ 70% Other 20% O' G ~ 10% Min. Req. Landscaoed O.S. Fence, Wall, or Hedge - Max. Height 6 ft. 6 ft. (;4ì, (;4ì, 6 ft. Private Open Space/Unit N/A 150 sq. ~ WÞA N/A ft. it, n,wThe reQnirement does not applv to existinl! lel!allots. I-Upper floors and in the rear lot areas only. 2 Building shall be set back ten feet if no covered arcade, or porch is provided at ITont. 3 If a continuous porch or arcade (min. 8 ft. wide) is provided at back of sidewalk (public R.O.W.) 4 Building height may be increased per Section IlI.F.8 S Limited accent landscapinl! shonld be provided whenever possible . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Ðe!etetl 'Fe." Changes in text location are not shown III-13 TABLE 1II-3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN . Residential Development Standards Public TSR1 MDR HDR OTC OS Development Standards Minimum Lot Area (so. It.) "OW 8,000 7,000 7,000 None None Average Lot Area per DU/room 1,0002 3,300 2,200 N/A N/A Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre ~ 12 20 N/A N/A ~ Lot Dimensions 80 ft. 40 ft. 30 ft. 0 0 Minimum Width at Reouired Front Setback Area Minimum Average Width 80 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. 0 0 Setbacks 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. Front Yard Comer Side Yard 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 0 0 Interior Side Yard 10 ft. 15 ft' 15 ft.' 0 0 Rear Yard 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. Ace. Bldg. On Interior Site Boundary 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. Sep. Between Buildin2s 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 20 ft. 0 One Story Two StorY 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. N/A N/A Three Story 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. N/A N/A Maximum Height 55 ft. 35 ft. 50 ft. 18 ft. 18 ft. Max. % of Lot Coverage 60% 35% 30% 50% 5% Onen Snace Reauired 10% 25% 30% 10% 80% Private Open SpacelUnit 0 200 sq. 150 sq. N/A N/A ft. ft. . "'WThe requirement does not applv to existing le2allots. 1 Sum of both side yard setbacks. Distance between strictures not less than 10 feet. P.rlHJtel rêem. Higher maximum deusities may be allowed by the City Council pursuant to the Village Center provisions described in the General Plan. New buildings within the Tourist Serving Residential Planning District that are adjacent to and orient toward Mercedes Street are allowed to use the development standards for the Tourist Retail Core Planning District. . Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Deleted K:Jff Changes in text location are not shown III - 14 Added Text . . . F. SPECIAL USE REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS The followinl! snpplemental development standards applv to development within the Old Town Specific Plan. The supplemental and special use standards include sidewalk cafes, vendinl! carts, mixed use development, and bed and breakfast facilities, as well as other I!eneral supplemental requirements. 1. SJ'!eeial '-'Bee Ce Bred b , DB. BlelJHIBlit Cede Tke folle "ilig S JBeial Use Reg¡datielis and Stand!li'ds eeRtailied ili Cka Jter <;'.9g.9S9 ef!lle DB. ele JIliBlit Cede a J Jlj hI tRia S JeeiHe Plan !li'ca as ell. a. 8. Commercial Delisit5 Bolius . dult Business 1-reades e. d. Temporal'} Office Modules Car "'ashes S..ap Meets Trash Colleetioø f_reas B. f. g. 2. ~ }Jl J!Ii'kilig rc€J.wreIDelits ili tkB S JeeiHe Plan !li'ea shall be as delilieated ili Ckll Jter <;'.21, Parkilig and beadilig ef!llc De. ele JIDelit Cede lŒleBs o JBeiHsallj regulated àiff<:relitl:, ili !IIis E JssiHs Plan. See seetiBIi eli PlIIJlie PaR:ilig Pre gram. 3. Sidewalk Cafes a. Intent Purpose Sidewalk cafes on public streets can enhance the pedestrian ambiance of Old Town and are encouraged. For the purposes of this section, ... is to set fiJrth tkB selUlitielis and re€J.!lirSIlislitB oodsr . hich a side. alk Bafe, as deHlicd, Ilia'¡ be permitted te eperate 8; Celiditiclial eBB Permit and RliefBaehmeßt Permit eli a poolie side alk i!hili tile EpBBiHs Plan area. 8. .Defiøitioø a sidewalk cafe is defined as any group of tables and chairs, and its authorized decorative and accessory devices, situated and maintained upon the public sidewalk or along the private porches and arcades for use in connection with the consumption of food and beverage sold to the public ITom or in an adjoining indoor restaurant. b. Sidewalk Cafes Permitted. A sidewalk cafe may be permitted only in land use districts which allow indoor restaurants. A sidewalk cafe may be located on public sidewalks, private porches, courtyards and arcades immediately adjacent to and abuttinl! the indoor restaurant which Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes/rom the Original Document £lJ!€Jtøti T&~t Changes in text location are not shown III-I5 operates the cafe, provided that the area in which the sidewalk cafe is located extends no farther alon!! the sidewalk's len!!th than the actual sidewalk fronta!!e of the operatin!! indoor restaurant and all other applicable provisions ofthis section are fulfilled. . c. Development Plan CoRditioRal Use Permit and Encroachment Permit Required AoSidewalk cafes may be pennitted with the approval of an Administrative Development Plan. in conformity with the requirements of the Specific Plan, and with approval of an Encroachment Permit for areas located with the public ri!!ht-of-wav. Both of these permits may be denied, approved, or approved subject to conditions of approval. ~ Conditional Uno Po_it appro ed!J:, the Planning Director and granted in oonf<J_it) ita tho ro! uiroments I!fthi8 Bootion Imd Chap tor ':'.91 of tho Do. I!ll!pmont Cede and thereafter o!Jtaining an Enorl!aehment Pormit. .Both po_itB ß'l0j !Je appro. od and isBlied Bu@jeot to oonditionB. d. l.ÎmitatioRs nil Requirements. Sidewalk cafes shall comply with the followin!! requirements !. Side'.::!I ¡ oareD ß'l0j !Jo permitted onl:,' in gollillg dismets ..hieh alll!.. indol!r rostallfants and then onl:, if the side"'alk oafe is sit!¡ated adjacent, tl! an indl!er rostallrant 116 opooiNed !Jolo . and tho side. all¡ oare's operation io incidental to and a pm of tho operation of such adjaoollt indoor restaurant. . 1) Enislillg illdoor roBtauralltB must oollfom!. to all sootiollB of tilo Hunioipal Code ill order to !Jo oligi!Jlo fur appf8 al of side.. alii -m-. 2) }.8ido . all¡ oafo ß'l0j !Jo looatod on tho pu!Jlio Bido.. alk immodiatelj adjaeent tl! and alJutting tho indoor roBtaurant '..'hioh I!porato8 tho narc, pro. ided that tho 8I'oa ill hioh tho side.. alll cafe is looated o][tollds no farthor alollg tho Bide all['s length. than the actual Bide all, Rontago of tho operating indoor rostallrlmt and all other applieaIJlo pro isiolls oftilis soBtioll aro fuUiJlod. 3) An indoor restaurant may be pennitted to operate only one sidewalk cafe and each sidewalk cafe shall be confined to a single location on the sidewalk. 4) A sidewalk cafe may be pennitted only where the sidewalk or porch is wide enough to adequately accommodate both the usual pedestrian traffic in the area and the operation of the proposed cafe. There shall be a minimum 48" clear distance free of all obstructions, in order to allow adequate pedestrian movement. . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document De!ettJtl 'h,!( Changes in text location are not shown III - 16 . . . ~ 5) All outdoor dining furniture, including tables, chairs, umbrellas, and planters, shall be movable. UmlJFellas m~ot Be se@oced ith a minimllf!! Bass 8f ft8t I@BB than iiI! p8\lftds. OHtd88r heaters, amplified mllsie, 8r 8j'Jeahrs shall Be FB.ie..ed at the tiID@ 8f applieati@ft for a C@nditi8ftal Uso P@m1it. 6) No signing shall be allowed at any outdoor cafe except for the name of the establishment on an awning or umbrella valance. 7) A side.. all: eafo m!!j seF':e eftl:, fe8d aftd B e .uages prepared 8r steeke¡ f{jr sale at the adjeiniftg ind8erresta\il'!ll1t; pm. ided that the seF'. iee 8fBeer er ifte, @r B8th, selel} f{jr @ft pFemises esftoum¡¡tioft B} eHstomers . ithill the area Bfthe side all: eafe has Beeft a\ltftSFj¡!ed as part 8f a e811ditioftal Hse pe_it apprø . a!. Raeh 8f the fo1l8 . iftg FellllireIDents IllIlSt alS8 Be IDBt: Ea) The area ift ":meh the side. allc eafe is a\lth@¥ized is idefttifie¡ ill a manRer, as I!jJpr8 . ed B:, the Planning C8mmis8ioR, .. hiGh \.ill eleal'i) separate ¡md delilleate it trom the areas 8fthe side 'all¡ hieh.. ill remaiR open t8 pedestri81l traffie. ElJ) The side alk safe operati811 is 001:, lieeRBed, @r prier to the seF' iee 8f an) !'Jeer 8r ille at the Bare, . ill!'Je dill:, lieoosed, 8:' gtate a¡¡th€lritieB to Bell Beer €Ir '.\'iRB, €Ir B€lth, fur e811B\ißlpti8R .. ithiN the lIfea efthe Bide.. all¡ safe. 12) The sidewalk cafe do not require the provision of additional off-street parking. Conduct of Business and Hours of Operation. All sidewalk cafes shall comply with the followine performance standards. # A sidewalk cafe may serve only food and beyeraees prepared or stocked for sale at the adioinine indoor restaurant. 8) The outdoor preparation of food and busing facilities are prohibited at sidewalk cafes. The presetting of tables with utensils, glasses, napkins, condiments, and the like is prohibited. All exterior surfaces within the cafe shall be easily cleanable and shall be kept clean at al1 times by the pennittee. 9) Trash and refuse storage for the sidewalk cafe shall not be pennitted within the outdoor dining area or on adjacent sidewalk areas and the pennittee shall remove al1 trash and litter as they accumulate. The pennittee shall be responsible for maintaining the outdoor dining Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document };)¿i/et;d T".~t Changes in text location are not shown 111-17 area, including the sidewalk surface and furniture and adjacent areas in a clean and safe condition. . 10) Hours of op el'ati on sha1l8e Ülel'ltieal te these efthe indeeffestatlf31!t. All furniture used in the operation of an outdoor cafe shall be removed from the sidewalk and stored indoors whenever the indoor restaurant is closed. 11) The City shall have the right to prohibit the operation of a sidewalk cafe at any time because of anticipated or actual problems or conflicts in the use of the sidewalk area. Such problems and conflicts may arise from, but are not limited to, scheduled festivals and similar events, parades, repairs tot he street 0 r sidewalk, 0 r emergencies occurring in the area. To the extent possible, the permittee will be given prior written notice of any time period during which the operation of the sidewalk cafe will be prohibited by the City. e. FiDdiDgs aDd CoDditioDs In eel1nBetion ith II JPŒ. al of a Cenditional Use Pc_it, the PIIII.Ring Dirccter shall makc findings that the pl'epesed epcratien mccts thB limitatiens ef this scetien. The Direeter ma;, impose such eenditiens in granting its appl'e. al as it decms are nceded to assW'e that the pŒposed OfWl'aticn ill meet the e J cl'ating rc!Jllil'ements Md ccnditions set fel'lh in this sectien and te ass\ll'e that the Joolie safet:, and .. elfüre . ill 8 e Jretccted. . :K T@rm aDd R@D@,.al ,A, Cenditienal Use Pc-it fer a side.. alll eafe ma:, 80 ap Jr€J':cd 8:" the PIl!I!ßing Dil'eeter fer a ma¡¡imum peRed ef ene :, car. Thereaftcr, the ];}ireeter, if M e¡¡!cnsien a J Jlieati€Jn is filed JRer te al'I:' en JÎl'ati6n datc €Jfthc Cenditienal Use Pc_it, ma;, e¡¡ten¡¡ the Jcmtit fer al'I additi€Jnal €Jnc :,'ear Jcriod. The ];}iycctor ma:, imposc ad¡¡itienal er l'e .ised eonditiens as neeessary te assure eeRtim18d cem Jlial'lee .. ith thiB Bceti€Jn. The ];}ireeter ma;, detemtine that III!. cnteßaien sh6ul¡¡ net be granted !II1.d ma:, dcll) an Bcl'l'lieatiol'l fof 0¡¡to1'l8iBn if tho fiIlIiil'lg8 fBY a fO BoatiBl'l O!lf! 80 made a8 deaeI'ihcd hcl€J... g. Suspension or Revocation A Conditional Uae Pc_it development plan and encroachment permit may be suspended or revoked h:, the Pll!l1l'ling ];}ireeter, following notice to the permittee and a public hearing, upon a finding that one or more conditions of approval for the permit or the requirements of this section have been violated, or that the sidewalk cafe is being 0 perated in a manner which constitutes a nuisance, or that the operation of the sidewalk cafe unduly . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document DBkteti FtHt Changes in text location are not shown III - 18 . . . 4. impedes or restricts the movement of pedestrians past the sidewalk cafe. h. l.f!f!@slo The a¡Jp Ii eant 8r all) imereeted p!lFtj ma:, a¡Jpeal a ¡!eeisi8n efthe PlanRing Direet8r te the Planning Cemmi8sien. Mixed Use Projects a. Purpose The development of mixed use projects, hils aile.. ed in the Teul'Ìst Retail ~ can present unique design issues not encountered in more conventional single use (e.g. all ee_ereial} projects. The primary design issue relates to mj¡¡gd ~se pr8jeet8 i8 the need to successfully balance the requirements of commercial and residential uses. Typical examples include, sueh lIB the! residential uses need for privacy and security, with the needs of commercial uses for access, visibility, parking, and loading. and f!eB8iBI:, 8][ten¡!e¡!liellfs ef epeFatiel'!. B. Definition For the purpose of this Specific Plan, mixed use projects are defined as developments which combine both commercial and residential uses or structures on a single lot, or as components of a single development in the Tourist Retail Core and Tourist Servin!! Residential Plannin!! Districts. The uses shall be combined either horizontally or vertically on the site. This means with. it' ¡il'! the 8ame struetllfe, for B;¡ample, office and residential uses on upper floors with retail on the ground floor, or with commercial uses on the primarv street and residences on the rear ofthe ~. c. Conditional Use Permit Required. A mixed use project may only be established after first obtaining a Conditional Use Pennit, a¡Jpf8.e¡ il'! Bemplianee '..ith the applieoole FBglilatiol'!s ef as described in the Development Code and in confonnance with the standards of this section. d. Limitations and Requirements I) Mixed use projects that provide commercial space on the ground floor with residential units above (vertical mix) are encouraged thou!!h residential units behind commercial space (horizontal mix) are also allowed. PmjBets that Pf8PO8B 8emmefBial ÐtruBtllfes Bl'! the Hel'!t p eRiel'! 8ftlw let. ith resideI!tial uees plaBed at the fear Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document E3!et8J T-ð " Changes in text location are not shown III-19 5. IJftlw lot €hol'Î:i!IJRtai Rli¡¡) arB Rot tloÐirah1e rerRlOBt IIJeatioRB iR Oltl TIJ. R. EJleO JtieRB .. ill lw rg io otl IJR a 01lB0 I-J:, oaBe I-JaBiB. . 2) The number of residential dwelling units shall be based on the carrvin!! capacity and desi!!n characteristics of each proiect. HeàÏllRl DoRBitj Re8ideRtiai DiBtl'Îet tl8RÐit) rogulati8R8 ef this S JoBiHB PI!IlI. 3) Residential units may not 0 ccupy ground floor space fronting on Front or Main Streets. 4) Structures with heights greater than two stories shall set back (all sides) upper portions of the structure a minimum of 10 feet for the additional story. 5) All roof mounted equipment shall be screened in accordance with the requirements of the Development Code. Special consideration shall be given to the location and screening of noise generating equipment such as refrigeration units, air conditioning, and exhaust fans. Noise reducing screens and insulation may be required where such equipment has the potential to impact residential uses. 6) . If onsite resident parkin!! is provided, separate access drives and parking facilities should be provided for residential uses and commercial uses whenever possible. Tlw RlIfRiJer ef JafhiRg Ð Ja88S Bhall I-Je iR a88ertlarwo ,¡,:ith the re! IÜreRleRts ef tho De :oIB JRleRt Ced8 !IlId this Spooiti8 PI!IlI. Residential visitor parking and commercial parking may be located within the same location/facility. 7) RosideRt Jarl¡jng !lf8aS shellitl I-Je Jre'. itletl .. ith 888OOt:, gates. Vendin!! Carts OllttlIJer '/ORtlBfO a. Purpose Outdoor vending on private property promotes public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment. However, reasonable regulation of outdoor vending is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. The purpose of this section is to set forth the conditions and requirements under which outdoor vendors may be permitted to operate on private property within the Specific Plan area. I-J. Defi»itio»B Fer Ju!' !BBeB sfthiB 8eeti8R, tho fells iRg tleHRitioR8 Ðhall a¡¡¡JI:,: . "St!llltl" meanB II ¡Juehe!l1't, ageR sr IInj Bther heeletl ehiele er tie. iee Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Ðe!8t8tJ TD;'i! Changes in text location are not shown 111-20 . . . mell mli) 8e ma. eB .. ithem tile !lB8iatanee af a meter and i8 H8eB far tll8 Bispla:'lf1g, staFÍflg ar tran8f!al'tiflg af artisl88 offered for 8ale 8j a . eflBÐr. "'.'eflBilJ.g" mean8 tile sale affÐaB ar m8reilanBi8e !farn a8tanB apel'!ltiflg €IIJ. pR. ate pnJpafÌ) . itllifl tile Speeifie Plall area. c. Vendors Permit ~ Reqnired It shall be unlawful to sell, or offer for sale, any food, beverage or merchandise on any property within the Specific P Ian area without first obtaining a Vendors Pennit. lIa.. e. er, e¡¡istiflg 8HsifleBBeB . lIiell legallj ap €Irate aHtBa ar Bi8pla:, 8 a f merellanBiBe pRer ta tile aBaptiafl afthiB Sp 8eifie Plan, ar8 flat r8!lt1ir8B tea Maifl a I ieefl8e fer a peRaB a h lie j 8ar frøm aB€lpti€lll. Applications for a vendors permit shall include a description ofthe type of merchandise or food to be sold, a detailed description and photoe:raph of the cart., and the approval ofthe owner ofthe site where the cart will be located. Vendine: Permits shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planuine:. The Director may apply any conditions necessary to protect the public health, safety. and welfare. B. f_J!J!lieatioD8 The 8f!plie!ltÏall f{Jr a '.'eflBÐr'81.ieellse 811an be SigHeB bj tile 8f!plie:mt and 811all illelHBe: 1) TRellarne, II€lIDe, anB IHI8ille8B aBdreBs eftlle !If!plieant, and lI1ell8flle anB aBdresB aftlle a ..lIer, ihtiler tllan tile !If!plieant, aftlle ending stand ta 88 H88d in tH8 ap8ratiafl aftile . enBillg 8HBiflesB. 2) }. BeseRptian af tile tj'Pe af feed, 88. 8rage, 8r merchandise te 8e søM, 3) f. àS8BFÍ]JtÍØIl aIlà JHØtØgr4l]JR (illBlllàillg sig¡¡age aIlà eølBFOj Bf anj 8tanB ta 8e H8ed ifl tile apeFatian afthe 8118ifleBB. 8. IBsuaDee aDd Fees ÞIBt later than 39 dajB after tile filiflg af a completed applieatÎBfI fer a . eflB€lr'8Iie8f1Be, the applieaHt shall 88 flatified eftile deei8i€lfl 8f1 tile i8BII1III8e ar d8IJ.ial afth8 lieefl8e. I) F888 811a1l8e BetemlineB 8j Re8elmien €Iftllg Cit'/ C€llIfleil aHd shall 8e paid prier tB iesH!lRee af ape_it. 2) l.i88f1BeB ta "aflB "'ithifl tHe Epe8Îfie Plan ar8a ella1l8e re. ie.. cd and aJ!pf€l eB 8;' the Dir88tar ifl 8afljllfletiefl .. itil tile ßu8ille8B l.ieeflB8 Added Text III - 21 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Pe!eteti TJJét Changes in text location are not shown f. RegÌstFati8H Fregmm, I!ltihliHg IUH! ~afet) !HId the ~HgÌReel'ÌHg J;}e Jar".meHt. . 3) There should be at least 200 square feet of use able or recognizable plaza or courtyard area for each allowed outdoor vending cart. The vending should be tree of all obstructions within a six foot perimeter. 1) LeeatieHB for eRdiHg ithiH the SJ'leeifie Film area shall Be RJ'IIJfO ed B:, tile J;}ireBtef. '.'eHæHg leeatieHB shalll3e deBigHated l3ased 8H tile alJilit) of the site te safel:, aeeommedate the !lBeB:' Het iHterrel'ÌHg itll J'ledestFÎM eirelllatieH ami aeeess er . shiels eifelliatioll er J'larlEÌHg. Tho Difeeter ma:, re! llire that the stlUld l3e feme. ed B-em tile leeatielllUld stered SIlt efJ'loolie ie' heH lISt iH - S) '.'ell'¡illg leeatiellß mal eh!HIge BIll:, llfIell .mltell re! llest B:, IUI RJ'IJ'llielUlt Md RJ'IJ'lre -aIB:, tile Difeetef. 6) All vending locations shall be on privately owned, developed, commercial property ithill the SJ'leeifie Plan area. Term aDd Rene.:al . ÞJI lieellßes arB . alid for BIle :, ear IlllieBs re. eked er BIlBJ'lellded J'll'Ìer te e¡[J'liratiell. !JI RJ'IJ'llieatiell te relle.. a liBellBB Bhalll3e madellet later tRaIl fiG dS:,BI3BferB tile e)¡J'liratiell efthe BIlffBHt liBBIIBe. LieeDBB feBB IUId reDe..al J'lrBeed""BS sHall Be eBtoolisHed iH aeBerdMBe ith tHe B"siHeBB LieeRBe RBgÌswatiBH Fregram J'lreBBdlil'eB e"tliHed iH tHe MlillieiJ'lal Ce'¡e. g. Prokillited Conduct and Hours of Operation All vendinl! cars shall comply with It shalll3e J'lfehiBited for an:, eatdoBr . eRder te eJ'lerate ¡¡Rder lUll efthe following conditions: I) Operate between 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. of the following day unless in conjunction with a special event. Y: All vendinl! carts shall require an approved City of Temecula business license. vii. Shall clean UP the area around where the vendinl! cart had been. This includes removinl! and disposinl! of all trash or refuse. viii. The Director of Planninl! may require that the vendinl! cart be removed from the location and stored out of public view when not in use. . Added Text III - 22 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Pe!et8iil TlL~t Changes in text location are not shown . . . 2) "boa. 0 Iffij . e!JJlilig starHI \ll!attmHleli. J) !:;tero, Jar ¡, odoa. 0 8!J.j . olHling stand.. ithin Iffij Jui!linig!lt of .. Rj IIr IIn Iffij !lnlle. elll JIIII IIr IItftOF . ise ao!lllt JfB JeRJ. 4) Vendin!! carts sellin!! &ell food or beverages for immediate consumption unless there is a litter receptacle available nearby for public use. 5) "bllf3.. II Iffij'lllllatilln "'itRllut íimt JillllÏng u J, remll . ing 8!J.d lIia JIIsing IIf all WaoR IIr remsll rllmaining Hllm sallis malill wllm thll stand. 6) Allow any items relating to the operation of the vending business to be placed anywhere other than in, on or under the stand. 7) Set up, maintain 0 r p ennit the use 0 f any additional table, crate, carton, rack, or any other device to increase the selling or display capacity of the stand where such additional items have not been approved in the by the Director. 8) Solicit or conduct business with persons in motor vehicles. <,') !:;ell aII)1lling IItller Hl8!J. tftat Ilioillile lie8ßße J!omlits. 10) Shall not operate any SlItlßlI IIr JBmlit tho 8o\ll!IIing IIf Rflj lIo';ioe IUBh JfBooees a lllud 8!J.II I'!U1BIIIle nllise, IIr IIse IIr lI JoratB an) loud speaker, public address system, radio, sound amplifier, or similar device tll attraet the attml1illll IInRII Ju!JliB. h. Vending Cart StaBd Reqnirements Vendin!! carts shall comply with the followin!! requirements: 1) '.' ellllllr shall !Je rei llirBIi tll goomit a JhlltllgJ'IIJ!1l IIr €Ira.. illg IIf tile Blilling stanll tll !Je 118ell fllr ro ie . lloollg 1IJ! Jlieatilln lIJ!J!fll. al JfBBOSS, illolllllilig matel'Îals, eolol'8 8!J.II BigRage. 2) The design and appearance of the vending cart shall be consistent with the carts in use between 1890 and 1920 in a character consistent with the Design Standards in Section IV of the Specific Plan. Colors used in coniunction with any vendin!! carts located in the Old Town Specific Plan area shall be consistent with the Sherwin-Williams Preservation Palette. 3) No stand shall exceed 4 feet in width, J!.4 feet in length, and 8 feet in Added Text III - 23 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Ps!etØ€/ Ts.ct Changes in text location are not shown height. . iii. Anv umbrellas or accessorv items used with vendinl! carts shall be made from hil!h Quality canvas, utilize a monochromatic color scheme consistent with the Preservation Palette and have no written or I!raphic advertisinl!. i. gafd~ Re'luinmeøto fJI stRlldB iø ef Rem RieR f{jed is ¡'IfB¡'I8fed ef saId gRaIl eef!!)Jl:, Colle\','illg rei airemellts: itl1. tfte I) fJl ei lIi¡'lmellt illstalled ill 8!lj ¡'18ft sftRe stRlld sRall8e seellred ill enler te ¡'Ire, ellt me , emellt dllfÌllg tftmsit 8I!.d to ¡'Ire . em Betaehmem ill the e, el'lt ef a e61lisi61l sr 6 . ertum. 2) '.II atellßilß shall 8e stored ill 6rder te ¡'Ire el'lt tReir 8eil'lg RIiRed a8611t ill tfte e, ellt ef a sllddell ste¡'l, eellisiell er e el'Wm, f. saføtj ImiCe holder shall 8e ¡'1m , ided to a. Bid leese sterBge eflmi es, J) Cef!!)Jresßers, atmililif) ellgmes, gelleraters, 8atteries, 8attery eRargers, gas fueled ','ater heaters, 8I!.B simil8f ei lIi¡'lHwl'lt shall 8S il'lstallBd S6 aß te 8e hid¡ el'l Rsm , ie.. te tfte e¡¡tem ¡'Iessi8le I!IId 8e easilj aeeessi8le. . J, RiBfllay of .bieeøBe }Jllieel'lses gRaIl 8e dis¡'Ilaj ed il'l a isMJle and esl'lS¡'lieaSIiB IseatisD at all times Bliril'lg tfte e¡'lerati61'1 eftfts , el'ldillg lJ1isil'leBS, k. l.d-'ertiBiøg No advertising, except the posting of prices, shall be permitted on any stand, except to identifY the name of the product or the name of the vendor. The total allowable square footal!e for vendor cart sil!nal!e shall not exceed four square feet on UP to two opposinl! sides of the cart. 1. Denial, Snspension, and Revocation Any license may be denied, suspended, or revoked in accordance with the procedures in the Municipal Code for any of the following causes: I) Fraud or misrepresentation contained in the application for the license, . 2) Fraud or misrepresentation made in the course of carrying on the Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document J)sls1si Text Changes in text location are not shown III - 24 . . . 6. business of vending. 3) Conduct of the licensed business in such manner as to create a public nuisance, or constitute a danger to the public health, safety, welfare, or morals. 4) Conduct of the husiness which is contrary to the provisions of this section. Bed and Breakfast Establishments a. Purpose The purpose of this Section is to provide standards for the development/operation of Bed and Breakfast establishments in Old Town. b. Requirements. All Bed and Breakfast Establishments in Old Town shall comply with the provisions contained in Chapter 17.10 ofthe Temecula Municipal Code. except for the minimum lot size and the requirement that the primary residence be the principle use of the site. c. Supplemental Requirements. In addition to the requirements stated above. the followin!! shall also apply to Bed and Breakfast Establishments within the Specific Plan. 1: Off-street parkin!! shall be provided at a ratio of one space for each bedroom available for rent in addition to the parkin!! required for the primary dwellin!! unit. This requirement can be satisfied throu!!h a centralized public parkin!! lot if t he owner participates in a parkin!! assessment district and the facility is located nearby. !!: Si!!na!!e shall be limited to one on-site si!!n not to exceed 6 square feet in area. The si!!n may be freestandin!!. 0. f.ppliea~ility ßed and ßreakfatlt Eß&..ß) esta1Jlishmeßts, aile'" aMe ~ iH the T£R, TRC, TSO, HDR, and CCT£ land use distriets, arB J!eFl!1itted and shall oe de el8J!8€l'sJ!erated in the [0118" il1.g m!ll1l1.er: I) Ths ]Jarssl 1lf!8H ,hish llis B&B sstalJliß!:mlßnt is ts lJs €Is ele]Js€l'8]Jsratsd shall e811.[0- t8 all standards 8f the land USB distl'Ìet , here it is Iseated; Added Text 111-25 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Ds/ststi T-8:M Changes in text location are not shown 2) 3) 3) 8) :) The ß&ß, if loBated in !fie HDR Dist!'Ìet shall Be an ineidemal'seeendlH) use sf a p1'ÎmRlJ d..elling unit fur Business pu1' Jeses. The iment of !fiese JŒ 'isi0ns is ts ensllFe !fiat esm JatiBilit) Bet' een !fie ß&ß IiI'Id adjaeem residential goDÎng IÎÎst!'Ìet8,fuses is maimained'enhaneed; . The exterior appearance ofthe structure housing the B&B should be a Queen Anne (Victorian ~, Bungalow, or other residential style of building in existence in the early 1900's; 1) If leeated in the HÐR er III.'R Dist!'Ìet, !fie s ..ner,'lessee sf !fie snemre 11.€J Ilsing!fie ß&ß shall €J J eme tlie estalJlislmlent and reside in the p1'Îm8i) d.. elling Ilnit; Ifl€Jeated in !fie HDR €Jr IIDR Dist!'Ìet, sel" i8e shall Be limited t€J the rental €Jfb eM€J€Jms 8.l!d the pr€J . isi0n €Jf meals fer registered guests. 1'1€J n0n guest dining ma:, Be aee€J_€Jdated; f. manimlID! €Jfg BeM€Jems ma:,'Be made a. ailaBle f€Jrrem. f. ß&ß l1.a. ing mere !fiat 8 Bewm ems a. ailalJle f.iJr rsnt ma:, Be appre sd B~ !fie Planning C€J_issien threllgl1. a C€Jnditi€Jnal Use Pe_it; . Rasli giiest shall registerä J€Jn am' aJ, stating !fieir date €Jf€Jeeli Jane~', n8l'l1e, ellffeßt residenee adMess an¡ !fiB lieense plate nlID!Ber €Jftl1.e "ehieh that is Being IIse¡ B~ the guest. The registrati€Jn fe- shall Be IlB Jt Ð) !fie €J ,1I'wr.'eperat€Jr f¡;r a Jel'Í€J1l €Jf2 ) ears and shall lJe made a ailable f€Jr muuninati€Jn IJ) a¡J JrBpFÎate Cit) fe Jressntati 8S ä J€Jn €Jne ¡ a:,!s n€Jtiee; 8) 1'!€J gll80t shall SIR) m€Jre tl1.!llI 11 eonßeelltÌ.e ¡ a)s in 8fl) 3Q da:, pe1'΀J¡ eftime; <;') :. e_ont Citj BIIsiness lieense shall B8 maintained' ¡ ispla:, ed in eemplianee ..itl1.!fie Cit) €JfTemeslllaHllnieipal C€J¡ e; 1~ All :Q&:Q's sliall lJe sll!Jjest to the Cit~'slietel(metelr€J€Jmtanin eBmplian8e ith!fie Citj ofT8meellla Hllnieipal Cede; 11) Off 8tfe8t parl::4ng sliall lJe pm. i¡ e¡ at a rati€J sf ene spaee f€Jr Bash lJe¡ reem a. ailaBle f.iJffent in a¡ ditisn te the pafl:ing re¡¡lIire¡ fer !fie p1'Îm8i) ¡ .. elling llßit. This pafl~ing shall net Be Ie eat8d n, ithin !HI) FB¡¡llÎre¡ s8t1Jaelm. This paflling may Be pre':ided in a eentmlized poolie parking let if!fie s ..'II8rpwtieipates in the ParhingAase881'11Bf1t ~ . Added Text III - 26 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document ])g!gt31J T-&/t Changes in text location are not shown . . . 7. 12) ¡¡igHa sllall lIB limited to one OB sitß sigH Bet te eJwßeà 1 s€ uare feet iB !lfea; !IIlà 13) TIIß ß&.ß Ðllall meet all ef tile le€ lIirßmßnts sf the Cit) Fiœ QejJal'tment. Old Town Historic Preservation District Ordinance (Moved to Section V in this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan) A. PURPOSE Protecting the cultural heritage and historical architectural resources found in Old Town is part of the overall goal for the vitalization of Old Town. The OTHPIO seeks to give owners of eligible historic properties relief ITom the contemporary municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws levied on newer contemporary structures. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT The boundary of the Old Town Historic Preservation District shall be coterminous with the boundary ofthe Old Town Specific Plan. a. ~ Tile jJ\li'jJeee efthe Old Te 'Ii IIiotel'ie Plees!" atien Diotriet OrdÍHanßß is tß estoolisll reglilatiens!lllà jJFoeeàtiles fsrlJwlàiBgs in Olà TS"'Ii"'rncll, àtie te their rnoteFÏeal er elllttlralBigHifie!lllee, re€ lIire l3 Jeeial eenoiàBmtißB te iBsars their jJreseF\ lNieB as a eeJnmooit) rBsellree. Tms sFàiBance sllall effect anti aßcslI'I !liÐII tile jJfßteBtisB, eManeBmBlJ.t, l!IJ.à jJßI'jJBtuatisB sf sllell imjJro. smcBts lIicll rßjJle8eBt er reRBet ÐigHifieant ßIßmßnts of tho Cit) '8 lIistGp). IJ. IJ'cfinitionB In this oràinl!lJ.ee, \IIlleBB tile eentc::t etheI'. iBe re€ lIilBS, tile folIe ing àefiniti6ns Bllall ajJjJI): 1) .'.pplieant. fJ\j jJßrBeB ..116 ajJjJlieB fer a CeFtifieate ef £'\pjJrBjJl'iateneBs aff{JetiBg jJFBjJe!'t) Bll@jßCt to this 6Fàinanße. 2) 'Iteration. a) f Il) act or jJrBeeßs ..mell eRanges or meàifieB eRe sr mere 6f tRe e¡¡tcFÏer arehiteetll1'!l1 fcatuleB 6f an e¡¡isting hiBtel'Ìe stnwMe .. ithiR the IJellRà!II'ÍeB ef tRe 0 là T e 11. II iBt6FÏe Added Text III - 27 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document 9-8!etffl T~ú Changes in text location are not shown c. 8Wuetl!fe . ithill the l1BtlII¡\al'ÍOS of tae 0 I¡\ T 0"'11 II ist8RO Presel'\ atiBII ];JistI'Ìet illBltI¡\illg, Imt IIBt limitB¡\ t8, mrtoABr Ba:rn.gos tB BrmB¡\j.licatiBII Br, sWueRlre, aroaitccIDfal ¡\etails, Br isual caaraetBAsties suca ae paillt BBIBr aII€I Stlf[aBe ~ . l1j The plaeOlJlBllt Br FOIllB. al Bf all) B¡rt8ABr BÞ.jccte slwa as signe, plaf 1iCs, ligHt .Ii¡¡ttlFBs, StFBCt fumi(¡¡.f8, . aIls, [eIlBes, etops, plalltillgB, aII€I lan¡\soapB aeeessBAes affootillg thc eutBR8r . istlal f tlalitiBs Bftlw pFBpcFtj, Br ej J.n:, liB.. B811StfUctiBII that rCf tlifBs a pc_it Br elltitIemBllt Bf usc WBID thc Citj BfTemcoula. 1) Certili@st@ of LJlJlronist@D@ss. }. e8Jti.lieat8 iSStl8¡\ 11:, thc PIs.IIIlÍIIg ];Jepaftm8l1t .. hicR apprB. es plalls f.ør th8 8BIIstrnetioll Br aJ.tcrati811 Bf 8R ilil JrB. emellt Br a IlIB¡\i.lisatiBII BftlSB Br a SpBBi.liB Sit8 Br lIalifal fBattlfe . ithill tho Ol¡\ TB..II IIistBAB PFCS81'\ atiBII ];JistAe!. 1) EIB. atioDs. Tae Rat seale B¥!asgfllfJliie prB:Îeet8¡\ €Ira.. illgB Bf all eutoRBr . e¥!ieal sUFfaoss Bf a 11 uil¡\illg. 3) Exterior 'rebit@Btural Feature. Ta8 ar8ait88ttlfal ¡\8sign, golloml 8Ffangomollt an¡\ 88IDpBII811tS Bf all Bf th8 BtltOf Sl!ffa8BB Bf all ilil Jrð.8mollt, illBlu¡\illg, 11 ut IIBt lilllitB¡\ tB, ta8 kill¡\, 8BIBF, !III¡\ tmrture Bftael1t1il€lillg material an¡\ th8 tj1JB an¡\ stj Ie Bf all . ill¡\B.. s €!SSf<!, lights, signs, all€! stHer Humes IIfJpül'teHallt te BüBh ilil JrB elllell!. . Ii) IIlIJlrB1'8m@Dt. : II:, l1uil€!illg stfU8tt1re, plaee, paHliRg faeilit), felleD, gate, . all, Br Btaer sÞ.jeet eBlIstitutillg a ph) sisal l1ette_sllt sheal pf€Jpeft), €Jr an:, par! sf StieR l1€Jtte_sllt. 7) gIll ToWII IIistori@Pres@y, atioD RistriBt. The area eBlltaille€! ill the Speei.liB Plalll1BIIII€!aries. Old Town Local Review Board (OTLRB) 1) The Old Town Historic Preservation District shall have a review board known as the Old Town Local Review Board to provide input into all major projects within the Old Town Specific Plan. The Director of Planninl! mav also provide the Board with information on major projects adjacent to Old Town that mav have the potential to effect the Old Town area. . Added Text III - 28 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document ÐsktBå T{))It Changes in text location are not shown . . . The Old Town Historic Preservation District shall have a review board known as the Old Town Local Review Board composed offive members and one alternate (who shall serve in the absence of any member) appointed by the City Council. Members shall serve without pay. All members shall exhibit an interest in and knowledl!e of the history and architecture of the Old Town Historic Preservation District. At least one member shall be knowledgeable in architectural and construction techniques and all members shall exhibit an interest in and knowledge of the history and architecture of the Old Town Historic Preservation District. The member terms shall be stal!l!ered so that all the members of the Old Town Local Review Board are not appointed at the same time. UomBers shall Be !l JjJeil¡ted for t8mlS of] ) ears, e¡wejJt that:! mcmBers ilÜtiall:, ajJjJeimed te the .Beard ohall Be ajJjJeimed (fir:!:, car tc_s 8e that thelu¡mBer efto_s onjJiFÌlJ.g ilJ. awl) ear shalllJ.et differ 11) mere thall elJ.e frem the lJ.ämIJ er ef temlS e¡llJiFÌlJ.g ilJ. all:' ether ) car. The altemate memBer shall Be ilJ.itiall:,' ajJjJ8inted fer BnB:, car. 2) The OTLRB shall hold regular public meetings and estaBlish SileR NIBs as mil) Be !l JjJŒpFÌate erneeessl!!') fer the erderl:, eendaet efits BasincBs. f t its firet meeting, the !l JjJeimed memBers shall eleet eŒeera .. hB shall sc", e fur tc_s ef 811.8 :, ear. Three mcm6ers gRaIl eenstitllte a ¡¡aerum. TRe OT1.R;Q shall have the following powers and duties in addition to those otherwise provided in this ordinance: a) Provide for pre-application conferences with individuals interested in constructing or altering property within the Old Town Historic Preservation District. The purpose of these conferences shall be to familiarize the applicant with the historic significance and related architectural themes of the district. b) Utilize the OTSB Design Guidelines in the review of applications which shall be submitted to the Director of Planning for a determination of consistency and completeness. The Design Guidelines shall be used by the OTLRB, Planning Department and Planning Commission as the basis of approving or denying applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness. c) Explore means for the protection, retention, and use of any significant structures, natural features, sites, and areas in the district including but not limited to appropriate legislation and financing by independent funding organizations, or other private, local, state, or federal assistance. Added Text III - 29 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document };)Ðl8tlJfi 'Fa;! Changes in text location are not shown d. d) Serve as an advisory resource to all agencies of the City in matters pertaining to the district, and to encourage efforts by, and cooperation with individuals, private organizations, and other governmental agencies concerned with preservation of the district's architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage. . e) Render advice and guidance, upon request of the property owner or occupant regarding construction, restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping, 0 r maintenance 0 fa ny structure, natural feature, site or area within the district. f) To encourage public understanding and appreciation of the unique architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage of the district through educational and interpretative programs. Building Pennits. Prohibitions 1) Within the boundaries ofthe Old Town Historic Preservation District, no building or structure shall be constructed or altered~ ll!lihliRg Jeoot shall Be isBlwd Bo tha Citj UJlle8s a without the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness is first issäaà Bo' the DiFeetsr sr Csmmis8isn. . 2) Within the boundaries of the Old Town Historic Preservation District, no person shall alter, or cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be constructed, any historic building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness. #. Within the boundaries of the Old Town Historic Preservation District. no buildinl! permit shall be issued unless a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness is first issued in compliance with the provisions ofthis Chapter. #. Interior buildinl! chanl!es to non-historic buildinl! and structures that do not effect the buildinl!s exterior are not reQuired to obtain a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness. 3) Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to exempt any person ITom complying with any other provision of law. 1) '.Vitrnn the Bs\!tulllt'ÌaB sfthß Old Ts ..n IIi8tsHe Pres a!" atisRDistI'Ìet na JamaR mal daIDslisft, r8ms . e, rßIseata, alter, ßaliBa ts IJ e altßred srmsàit:> an) hilàing sr struetltFe listaà B81a . iths~t a CeFtifieata . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document ¡)SI8tEd T-8.øt Changes in text location are not shown III - 30 . @e !.ppr@pfÌatoßoBB iBBIlO€! 8:' thol;)irootor or CommiBoi@ß. The City Council has identified the followinl! historic buildinl!s and structures in the Old Town area. These buildinl! and structures are officially desil!nated on the Local Historic Rel!ister for the City of Temecula. All buildinl!s on this list are elil!ible to receive any and all benefits authorized bv the State of California for desil!nated historic structures. The use of the Historic Buildinl! Code is specificallv authorized. !1. The list of Desil!nated Historic Buildinl!s and Structures is as follows. The locations of the desil!nated historic buildinl!s and structures are also shown on Exhibit V-I. #. . a) b) c) d) e) f) g) ~ I) j) k) I) m) n) 0) p) II) r) s) t) u) v) w) ¡¡) :,) . Saint Catherine's Church, Sam Hicks Park, 1920; Palomar Hotel, 28522 Front Street, 1915; Arviso House, 41915 Fourth Street, 1920; Dell!ado House, 41878 Fourth Street, 1920; Alec Escallier House, 41852 Main Street, 1927-28; Machado Store, 28656 Front Street, 1910; Clogstone Restaurant, 28676 Front Street, 1932; Yill@It'B Carago, 28515 FfOßÍ Stroot, 1','19; First National Bank, 28645 Front Street, 1914; Burnham Store, 42051 Main Street, 1902; Friedeman Meat Market, 42050 Main Street, 1901; Welty Hotel, 42100 Main Street, 1901; Welty Buildinl!. 28659 Front Street. 1897 lmmigr!lllt afRoo, 12121H1aiß Street, 18','1 J.D. Welty, 42081 Third Street, 1936; Unnamed Residence, 42251 6th Street, 1928; Bill Friedeman House, 42291 6th Street, 1922; lImy 'gaIters lI@llse, 2£535 Pllj€ll Street, 1','39's; Nienke House. 28575 Pujol Street, 1936; McConville House, 28585 Pujol Street, early 1890's; Albert Nienke House, 28649 Pujol Street, early 1920's; G.A. Burnham House, 28653 Pujol Street, early 1880's; Al Olto House, 28717 Pujol Street, 1882; Fred Ramirez House, 28725 Pujol Street, 1920; l..ngel Ramiro¡,j lIallse, 28731 Pllj€ll Street, 1 ':'26; !III€! 28735 Pllj@1 Stroot, E'l9. Saint Catherine's Church buildinl! (Historic Buildinl! "A") was relocated to Sam Hicks Monument Park in 1992. The Bill Freideman House (Historic Buildinl! "0") was relocated on the same site in 2003 as part ofhousinl! project sponsored bv the City Redevelopment Al!encv. Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Delil/øJ 'F""oi Changes in text location are not shown III - 31 1, . Since the initial adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan. a number of previously desie:nated historic structure were determined to be substantially dilapidated and/or unsafe and it was determined that these historic structures could not be rehabilitated. The followine: is a list of desie:nated historic structures that were demolished since the Plan's initial adoption 1994. This listine: has been provided for historic documentation purposes only. !, Harry Walters House. 1930's. 28535 Puiol Street. Removed in 1996 Unnamed residence. 1920. 28735 Pujol Street. Removed in 1999 !!., £: Knott's Garae:e. 1910. 28545 Old Town Front Street. Removed in 2000 .!!: Ane:el Ramirez House. 1926. 28731 Pujol Street Removed in 2002 e. ^ I'Il'IliBatieR Fer Certificate of Historic Appropriateness . 1. No existine: buildine: or structure may be altered or demolished. and no new buildine: or structure constructed without the prior approval of a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness pursuant to the provisions of this Section. 2. Certificates of Historic Appropriateness may be issued either bv the Director of Plannine: or the Plannine: Commission or City Council as part of the approval process for any development within the Old Town Specific Plan. The determination of who approves the Certificate of Historical Appropriateness shall be based upon the approval authority established bv the Development Code for the accompanvine: application. No development application for Level Two projects in Old Town. as described below. may be approved without a recommendation from the Old Town Local Review Board. 3. For the purposes ofjmplementine: the provisions ofthe Old Town Specific Plan there are two levels of Old Town development project. The first catee:ory is the ministerial or minor projects. referred to as Level One projects. The second catee:orv is for non-ministerial and major projects. also called Level Two projects. a. Level One Projects do not require the review and recommendation of the Old Town Local Review Board. Level One projects may be approved bv administrative (staff only) review followine: the Director . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes/rom the Original Document Eelstei Tæct Changes in text location are not shown III - 32 . . . of Planninl!'s determination to I!rant a Certificate of Historical Appropriateness. Tvpical examples include the followinl!: Interior chanl!es or alterations to historic structures; Re-Iandscapinl! around existinl! structure; Re-roofinl! of an existinl! buildinl!; Additions and remodels to non-historic sinl!le family residences: Exterior architectural modifications to an existinl! commercial, office, or resideutial buildinl! effectinl! less than 25% of the front or street side exterior facade; The demolition to non-historic buildinl!s and structures; New sil!ns UP to 12 sauare feet in size; and Chanl!es in the COpy of previous Iv approved sil!ns. The Director ofPlanninl!, at their sole discretion, may forward Level One projects to the Old Town Local Review Board when uniaue circumstances, or the sensitivity of adjacent historic structures or land uses indicate the potential for an adverse aesthetic impact. An Rj'!plioatien for a Certiiieato of ) ppfÐpFÌatenosB, !ltitheFÌBing the e@nstruotion, alterati@n, @r dem@liti@n of a building @r struohlro' ithin tho OM To 'l1 IIist@FÌe PFOSOl" ation DiBtriet, shallbo mads in aee@rd!lfieo . ith tho f@Ilo ing pŒBOàllfO: I) ~Æo o..'!ler, or poTBon !Itith@FÌgod bo- tho @ . ner, @f a pFOperto' may ro! llost tho iSSlianoo @fa Certiiieato of hppF@pFÌatenoeBbo íiling . ith the rImming Dopartment an applioatien fur a oortiíioato on a fo- famishod by tho Planning DepaI'tmont. 1')0 Rj'!plisation shall be aeoepted bo the ];)epartmont lIDIoss aoeompaniod bo tho Rj'!propFÌato iiling f-ce, sueh data !lfiil other infe_atioR as iB re! llired bo the PlaI.I!.iRg ];)ireetoF, iReladiRg aRj Fe! llired OR iroBmsRtal d@e_oRtati@R,!lfiti tiFa..mgs sigHeti bo tho arehitoot rosponsiblo for the dosiga o@notmoti@R, @r altefati@n @fthe strueture, Tho àra . ings mllBt bo in SllfíioioBt àotail t@ Bh@ ., insofar as thso relate to eJlteFÌor appearalleeB, the pŒpOBSd arehitoetllml tiesigll, iBelüàing ele. ations (inollitiing Biglloj, prepoBeti mateFÌals, tmrmres,!lfià eelom, iBelllàiBg BampleB of mateFÌals or eoloM !lfià a site IBj 0 lit iBelllàing all impr@ omenta afrooting appoaralloea, alloh as malls, .. alks, toFfaeos, pl!lfitings, aoeess@1') lJ1iiltiings, fFeestanding sigHS, lights, anti @thsr similar elements. 2) U¡!on fooeipt @fa oompleted applioation, tho ];)ifoetor dote_iRes tho 1,e el ofR e ie . rO! aiFOil ¡'O the Rj'!plieatioR. n e apf'lieatioR . ill ¡'o aa8igHeileithora1e.elOReRo io @r1e.eIT oRe.ie .. Added Text III - 33 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document PsIst,!." T-3!~t Changes in text location are not shown 4. a) 1e :el Olie Proieets ds list re! uire Old To .Ii 10eal Re. ie.. ßoardorDe.elofJmelitRo.ie.. CommittoeEf}RC)re ,is .a¡¡d are regarded a8 milior ~lteratielis to e¡¡istilig BtrnehifSB or the eoli8tf\!stiSI'l of a siligle family d. 'ollil'lg ooit. If the PfO J eBed Jr~eet iB ¡Jeemsd !! J JrspfÌate thrOllgft. the admiliiBtrati e "Btaffolilo" fS. ie.., the fJfojeet ma;, \Je gFaTlt.ed a Cel'lifisate sf AfI JrspfÌateI'lSBB. . Ths Difoetsr IDa:; maim a dstsl'l11iliatieli that, \JeealiBs sf lIliÜ\lIe eirelimBtaneeB srthe Belioiti. it) sfa¡¡ a¡JjaeelithiBtefÌs strustlirs srla¡¡d lise, a 10. el OliO pf~oet shslild \Je fe 'ie.. ed aeesf¡Jilig to the pfseedllfes sf a 1e el T . s Jf~8et. \J) 1e. el T.'o Proiests are gelierall) regarded \Jo the Direetor 86 fJrejeets hll', il'lg the pstootial fer Big¡¡ifis81J.t aesthetic im JaetB slitheBul'feul'ldiligarea. he.eIT. sPf~set8fe!J.uirefe.ie. \Jo the OI¡J To 1'1 10eal Re. ie . ßsard (OT1.IŒ) !lß¡J the De elsfJmeHt Rs. is.. Committee fJfÌsr to aetisli \J} the filial re':ie.: !ltlthsfÌt). he. el T . 0 pf~eetß ilieillde, \Jilt are list limite¡J to: b. Level Two Projects have tbe potential for sil!nificant aesthetic impacts. Level Two Projects shall always require review by the Old Town Local Reyiew Board prior to action by the approvinf! authority. Typical examples of Level Two projects include, but are not limited to, the followinl!: . Multi-family residential projects; New commercial and office projects; Exterior architectural modifications to an existing commercial, office, or residential building when 25% or more of the ITont or street side exterior facade is affected; The alteration to a designated historic structure; The demolition of, or substantial alteration to, a designated historic structure (requires Planninl! Commission approval); New signs over 12 square feet; Mini-monument sil!ns located on architectural features that exceed the standard heil!ht requirement of four feet; and, The removal of a specimen oak tree with a 10 inches or greater trunk diameter. All applications shall be filed on the forms and in a manner determined by the Director of Planninl!. Applications shall not be accepted unless they are accompanied by the appropriate filinl! fee and such information and drawinl!s as may be required by the Director ofPlanninl!. All applications for Certificates of Historic Appropriateness shall be sil!ned by either the owner of the property . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document pf'}!ßtf'}ti 'F13.¡t Changes in text location are not shown III - 34 . . . or a person authorized bv the owner. All drawines shall be siened bv the architect responsible for the desien and must be in sufficient detail to show the proposed desien for the site. This includes the architectural desien and elevations (includine siens), proposed materials, textures and colors (includine material samples), and the site lavout (includine all improvements affectine appearances, such as walls, walks, terraces, plan tines, accessorv buildines, siens, lieMs, and other similar elements). 5. Followine the receipt of a complete application, the Director of Plan nine shall schedule a meetine of the Old Town Local Review Board within 60 davs and provide the Board with a staff report, includine a copv of the site plan and elevations. The Board shall review the application material and make a recommendation to approve or denv, with or without conditions, anv requests for a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness to the approval authority desienated bv the Development Code. 6. In considerine applications for Certificates of Historic Appropriateness, the Old Town Local Review Board shall make the followine findines: a. That the proposed structure is in conformance with the eeneral plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances ofthe city and is desiened for the protection ofthe public health, safety, and eeneral welfare. b. That the proposed structure is in conformance with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan, includine the eoals, objectives and policies, and architectural euidelines and standards. c. In the event of the proposed demolition of a desienated historic buildine or structure, the Board shall also be required to find that applicant has submitted substantial evidence that the structure is imminentlv daneerous or unsafe and that the structure can not be effectivelv repaired or retrofitted. 7. The expiration date for a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness shall be the same as expiration date for the accompanvine plannine application, as mav be extended pursuant to the provisions of the Development Code. If the Development Code does not specifv an expiration date, the project which the Certificates of Historic Appropriateness was approved shall commence construction within three vears of the date of approval or the Certificate of Historic Appropriateness shall become null and void. No extensions oftime will be allowed for these projects. J) UpBI1. øete_il1.atiBI1. Bftlw ke 01 BfRe. ie . re€ tlir¡¡ø, tke Directs! sf Plllllflil1.g Ðhall tfllIl8mit II BSfl~ Bf alike. el T"B afJfllieati@11.8 t8 dlB Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document ];)B!€IB¡J Tag! Changes in text location are not shown III - 35 OTurn lUul aw" 6tHef Be !artme1K 6f agcIIe) BeemeB IIeeeOBi!f) \J:, tHe DiFBetsr, BaBH sf ..HiBH sHall Ha.e 3IJ Bays te sH\Jmit . l'ittell esmmcIlto ts the PlarJliIlg Difeetsr. . 1) U !6I1e;l !iFati6I16fthe 3IJ Ba) FB. ie., !e1'ÏBB, the Direetøf 6fPI¡¡¡~lÍHg BHaIl tnlIlsmit a e6 !:' 6ftHe a ! !lieati6I1, a !1R!1.liIlg BtafffC !ert, 8.I\B all e6mme1KB feeei, eB t6 tHe fe, ie, allth6l'itj f6f its fe, ie.. 8ftB FeesmmeIlBati6I1, THe Fe, ie , !ItItlw1'Ït:, BHaIl a ! !f6 ,e, 8fJ !f6 ,e .. ith esIlBiti6I1B, 6f Bell) 8ft 8fJ !liBatÌSIl fur a C8I'!iNeate 6f A ! !f8 !l'iatelieBB ill eelft !li8fteB ith the fe€¡lliFemeIltB 6f tHe Cit) 6f TemeeH!a ge el6 !mellt C6Be, S) THe 9iFeBt6f ef PlarJliIlg BHali !el'ioBieall) !fO iBe a eo !:, 6f all 8fJ !FO eB 1e el OIlB CBrtiNeateB 6f f4J !f6 !l'iatBlie8B t6 tke OT1Rß for their inro_atÌoIl eIlI). f. ~ THe 8fJ !lieaIlt, Of 8ft:, iIltefesteB !ef86R mas' a ! !€al a deeisioll OfthB PlaŒiIlg Direet6f ør PI_iIlg C6mmi8Si6I1 ÍII BeID Jlianee .. itli the !f6eeOOre8 set f6rt!1 ill tHe Cilj 6fTemeeuia De, elO !IDeIlt C6Be, Þ!6tiee oftße a ! !eal ßem¡¡g BHall\Je !r6':ideB to the OT1Rß and all !ef861iB 8.I\B 6fg¡¡¡li¡;¡atioIlB ..H6 hR. e Nled an annual"'l'ittell feljHeBt t61w R6tieeB 6f I\flj a ! !eaIB ..itftill the Old T6..II IIiBtel'ie l'feBeF atisnDistriet 8.I\B ..h6 hR, e !aid the fce t6 e6 ef tHe 66st8 ill 61 ed. . G. MAlNTENANCE AND CARE 1. The owner. occupant, or other person in actual charl!e of an buildinl! or structure on Old Town Temecula Local Historic Rel!ister shall keep in I!ood repair all of the exterior portions of such improvement. buildinl!. or structure. all of the interior portions thereof when subject to control as specified iu the desil!nation statement, and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary top revent deterioration and decay of any exterior architectural feature. 2. Nothinl! in the requirements of section shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of anv exterior architectural feature in or on anv desjl!nated Old Town Temecula Local Historic Rel!ister buildinl! of structure that does not involve a chanl!e in desil!n. material, or external appearancethereoL . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document ÐÛðt:!J.i'I'-æ.t Changes in text location are not shown III - 36 . . . H. ADDITIONAL VIOLATION PROVISIONS FOR HISTORIC STRUCTURES 1. In addition to the 2eneral violation provisions in Section III.H.? of the Specific Plan, anv person who demolishes. alters or removes a buildin2 or structure on the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Re2ister, that person and the owner shall be required to restore the buildin2, site, or structure to its ori2inal condition and sellin2 prior to the violation within ninety davs. Anv action to enforce this provision may be brou2ht by the city or any other interested party. This civil remedy shall be in addition to, any criminal prosecution and penalty and any other remedy provided by law 2. If any person demolishes or removes an buildin2 or structure on the Old Town Local Historic Re2ister in violation of this section. no buildin2 or construction related (includin2 2radin2) permits or permits to use the property as a parkiu2 area or other commercial venture shall be issued for a period of UP to seveu years, at the City Council's discretion, based on the si2nificance oCthe resource from the date of demolition, except to replicate the lost resource. The failure to adequately maintain a desi2nated historic buildin2 or structure can also be considered to constitute the unauthorized demolition of a buildin2 or structure on the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Re2ister. For the purpose 0 f this section, the demolition shall b e presumed to have occurred on the date the city has actual knowled2e of the demolition. The owner shall have the burden of providin2 an earlier date. if eutitlement to an earlier date is claimed. The owner shall have the affirmative obli2ations to plant 2rass. to provide a temporary irri2ation system to maintain such landscapin2 and to prevent the accumulation of debris and waste on the property durin2 the interim period. 8. QtheJ' !!:fI@@ial R@gulations and Standards For IHlI]'IO808 of oolioi8tOßO:" R!!à olal'it) an:, 8 !ooial rogulatioliB or 8tanàarà8 that !lFø RO! aààreB8eà iR iliiB SpoBiHB PIR!!, the DiFoBtor 8hall FofBr to the Do. BlopmeRt Coàø fer guiàanoo. gemo oftho08 sp@@ial regtliatioR8 or stanàarà8 mil) iROlllàø. D D D D fie_it !:"os anà proo08oiRg proooàllr08 !kG ¡¡gill toloI'8l1! hmàso8jJo palette imgatioR stanàarà8 troo plantiRg 8tanàarà8 G. SIGN REGULATIONS Tho plll]'l080 of !lIB 8igr¡ rogulatioRs i8 to pro. iào tho mOR!!8 for adol uats ideRtiHoatioR of IHlilwRg8 R!!d IHl8iRoB8eB è) rogulatiRg and ooRtrelliRg tho d8Biga, Bi80, anà IOOatiOR of all 8igas .. i!hiR ths gpOOiHO Plan area onoop! tho lIigh a:, Tom8! CoHlHlorsial Di8t¥iot, Mewum DeRsi!) R88iàeRtial ];)iot¥iot, IIigh DoRoitj R08iàoRtiai ];)j8mot, R!!d tho CoIDl1luliitj. Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document PeJf!tf!:J TeJ€t Changes in text location are not shown III - 37 Co_ereisl DietJ!Ïot .. Rem tho sigH re¡¡liiremolNs of tile De. el@j!merIt C@Be shallllj!¡¡l). Those regulatim'ls B@ n@t aj!¡¡l:; t@ selyioe stati@ns. The re¡¡liirem@Rts @ftho Do ol@j!mBRt COBO Bhsllllj!j!l:, for Be!". iee Btati@RB. . The intent of these regulations is to establish specific standards for all exterior signing that will ensure continuity, consistency, and harmony with the architectural quality of the Old Town environment as it may have appeared in the early 1900's, 1. Auulicability These re!!ulations shall auuly to all si!!na!!e within the Tourist Retail Core and Tourist Servin!! Residential areas of the Suecific Plan. Si!!na!!e within the Hi!!hway Tourist Commercial District, Community Commercial, Medium Density Residential District., and Hi!!h Density Residential Land Use Districts shall comuly with the si!!n requirements contained in the Develoument Code and the Si!!na!!e Desi!!n Guidelines contained in Section IV.J of the Suecific Plan. 2. Permit Required Unless suecifically stated in these re!!ulations, a si!!n uermit is required urior to niacin!!, erectin!!, movin!!, reconstructin!!, alterin!!, or disulayin!! any si!!n within the Suecific Plan. I. C@Iftljliaßee ROQllÏroB . })@ j!em@R Bhall Brest, reereet, e@RBlR1et, enlarge, alter, m@"e, imtJre e, FemB e, 801'1, 8Ft, @r 8¡¡liij! an) sigH @r BigH BIR1Bmr8 @r ORUBe @rj!mmit the Bame t@ Be dBRe e@RtrRl') t@ @riR . ielatieR !Jf all) !Jfthe ¡¡re, isi!JnB @ftheBe sigH F8glilatisRS. 2, UHeeFtaiRP, On;igR Re~lati@RB If a eituati@R maos that is R@t o@ Bred 8:' thoso sigH Fogulati@na or tIloro is amlJiguit) as t@ !hoBe regulations @r!hB t:,'f!o ef¡¡Bm1Ìt re¡¡liirBd, tkB DireBtBr Bkall ¡¡F@,isB 'l.'J!ÏtteR intB1J!rBtati@R aft or B@RBliltiRg tkB DB, BI@j!mBnt C@Be, 3. Prohibitions No uerson shall erect., re-erect, construct., enlar!!e, alter, move, imurove, remove, convert, or equiD any si!!n or si!!n structure or cause or uermit the same to be done contrary to, or in violation of, the urovisions of these si!!n re!!ulations. All si!!ns not exuressly uermitted by this Section are urohibited. No auulication for si!!n uermit or other auulication for a urohibited si!!n shall be accepted, acted uuon, or auuroved. . J, ConoMI £il8l EtR1lBards Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Peleted TI3.,( Changes in text location are not shown III - 38 Added Text . 4. . 5. . a. 1'Jo Raga orpolJJloots of 8.11) type ma)'Bo atilisoà to dTa atteDtÏtm to all)'ü80 er SOOOtüTO 01'1 a po_anoHt Basis. {:oleroà Rags ..kioh oeHIaiH He ..'filiHg, iHaignia orleges ma) 1!e €lisp I!!) od 2 limes per) car for peFie ds 1'101 10 mwoo€l JQ dllJs. This docs Hel proel~€lo tho €liopl!!) ef HatioHal, state, or lBcal go emmoHt Rags or ether Rags, p olJJlants, er 1!anncrs BiBB are remimseoHt of the oar"j) 1';'QQ's. B. The area ora all sign or logo .ì'ith iHdi iàllailetteTs shall1!e measllfeà iJ" a rectangle aretlHà the oütside Bfthe 10ttOl'ÌHg ana/or tho flioteFial s)'Hl1!ol. e. PlllIJliHg and ßüilàiHg DefiartmoHts Te'. io' BHa apfJre, al is Telillireà prier 10 the ¡JlaeiHg, orootiHg, mo"iHg, or weoflsooetiHg of an) sig¡¡ ., ithiH the EfiOeifte Plan area, ooloss oH¡Jrossl) mwlHfJted. Prohibited Signs in Old Town 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Freestanding signs on lots with less than 300' of road frontage Roof mounted signs Animated signs, including time and temperature displays Rotating, moving, emitting, or flashing signs Balloon signs Ambient air balloons Internally illuminated signs, including front and back lit awninl! and window locations Neon tube signs Window signs above the second story Paper, cloth, or plastic streamers or bunting - except holiday decorations Fonned plastic or injection molded signs Statues used for advertising Traffic sign replicas Vehicle signs Intomall" ¡¡¡_iHated a.. HiBgs ßaeklit illümiHatcd a mHgs Any sign prohibited by the Development Code and not expressly "Pennitted" in this Specific Plan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pennitted Signs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wall Mounted Signs (business identification) Wall SigHs (ad"ol'tioiHg i.e. U:9Q's st)le) (Supergraphics) Monument Signs Window Signs Under Canopy Signs Awning Signs Projecting Signs Indirectly Illuminated Signs Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document J}8løt8tl Te-et Changes in text location are not shown 111- 39 6. D Temporary A-Frame or Sandwich Board Signs . a. b. c. d. e. Sign Standards Wall Mounted Signs Maximum of one square foot per linear ITont foot of business establishment. To be located not higher than the lowest of the following: 25 feet above grade; Bottom of the sill line of the second floor windows; or Cornice line of the building. Supergraphics The purpose of allowing wall supergraphics is to allow the advertising or depiction of products that may have been available in an 1890's marketplace. A suverl!ravhic is a mosaic, mural, vaintinl!, I!ravhic art, or combination thereof which is vrofessionallv avvlied to a buildinl! that does not contain any brand name, vroduct name, letters of the alvhabet svellinl! or abbreviatinl! the name of any vroduct, comvanv, vrofession, or business, 0 r a nv lol!o, trademark, trade name, or other commercial messal!e. Maximum size shall not exceed 60% of wall surface. . Monument Signs Maximum of one double face sign per street ITontage if said street ftontage is over 150 feet. Height of sign shall not exceed 6 feet above grade. Width shall not exceed 4 feet. Each tenant placard shall not exceed 12" high. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated, internal illumination is prohibited..liQ monument sil!ns are allowed if the street frontal!e is less than 150 feet. . Permanent Window Signs On ground level, coverage shall not exceed 20 percent of the total window and door area visible ftom the exterior of the building; on second level, coverage shall not exceed 30 percent per window. (No window signs are pennitted above second level). Awning Signs On ground floor level; 20 percent maximum coverage allowed of the total exterior surface area of each awning. On the second floor level and above; 10 percent maximum coverage allowed of the total exterior surface area of each awning. Internal illumination prohibited. . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document REi/8Ied 'Ie et Changes in text location are not shown 11I - 40 . . . f. Projecting Signs One per business allowed; maximum size may not exceed 3 square feet and shall not extend more than 3 feet from the wall surface. No illumination allowed. Projecting signs shall only be attached to buildings, not to poles or other signs. Projecting signs may encroach into the public right-of-way a maximum of 3 feet subject to the approval ofthe Director of Plannine:. g. Under Canopy Signs One per business allowed under a canopy, roof, covered walkway, or porch; maximum size of 3 square feet per door entrance; minimum of 7' vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. h. A-Frame/Sandwich Board Sign One A-frame or sandwich board sign allowed per property for up to 12 days per month (i.e. on Friday, Saturday, Sunday) and nationally desie:nated Monday holidays. Maximum size 00.5 feet high by 2 feet wide. A-frame sie:ns shall not block the sidewalk and may not be illuminated. We illtlmfIlatim'! 3118 B€!. No permit is required for A-frame and sandwich board sie:ns which comply with these provisions. 1. Temporary Signs Temporary grand opening and special event signs are allowed for each business establishment on the exterior wall. Signs shall not be attached to any other freestanding element (porch balustrade, garden wall, tree, monument sign, vehicle, etc.). Signs shall be constructed of cloth, canvas, or other durable material. Plastic or vinyl banner signs are not permitted. The use of is also prohibited neon colored/day glow banner signs is also - prohibited. Temporary signs shall abide by the provisions of the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs, as amended. j. Menu Boards One menu board, up to 4 square feet in area, is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. Menu Boards may contain only the name of the establishment and the food available inside. The menu board must be located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance. k. Multi-Tenant Project Signs Any project that proposes to provide space for more than one tenant shall indicate the size and approximate location of all signs to be erected on the property at the time of initial application. Signs shall be shown on elevation Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document ];)818183 'Fe :1 Changes in text location are not shown III-41 drawings with accurate dimensions provided. Th@ DiFeotor ma) also rsl uire the folio ing inf@_atioll: . 0 0 0 t lethe€! ef illllHlillatiell; gig¡¡ materials aIId eolero, a¡¡€! Hethe€! ef attaehrnellt. 1. Permits Required All I1o_anellt sig¡¡o shall FelJ.liire a I18mlit I1rier te oFeetillg er attaohillg the Big¡¡. Refer to the De oloI1ment Ce€!e fer €!eseFÌI1tien efI1e_ita FelJ.liirod. II. DE"E1.9PJ\1ENT INCENTI'.'E B9l"IYEEE m eFder te aohie. e tho t) 'j!e amllJ.ualitj' ef €!e eleI1mollt all€! Fe, italigatiell ell. i8iellod for the SI1ooitie PIa¡¡ area, certain €!@,eleI1mollt illeollti.o Bell1i8eo 11.3,0 BOOII est81'!liÐhod to eBOe11l'ago €!o oleI1or8 a¡¡€! I1f8I1°r!) e 110m to I1artioiI1ato ill the, arielio I1regram.a €!08eriBod ~ mO@lIti,e Bell1i8es IDa) Be gr311tod at the €!i8oretiell ef tho PlaIlllillg Cemmi88iell er Cit, Celllloil an€! lIe!fiing eelltaille€! hereill shall eBligate !fi@ City te I1re, i€!o an:, ef!fie fello .. illg ~ I. Ped08tria¡¡ !.mellitie8 IDoOllti e . a. PurpO8e TMGIlgftollt !fiG 8J'!GGitiG Plan area it ia deairllIJle to eBBo_ge J'!G€!B8tRBR oriollte€! sI1aoe8 ithill ill€!i i€!ual eell!lI!ereialBliil€!illg sites 8lieh a8 I1laza8, eellrtjar€!8, a¡¡€! aeatillg areas. Slieh features lIst Dill} malle!fie I10d08tria¡¡ ell, irenm.ellt mere I1IBasant IJIlt the) alae ad€! aig¡¡itieantl) to !fiB o Brall iBliallJ.uali!) of !fie jJartioHlar eommereial I1rejeet. 11. !.lIlIro','al !.utkoritj' The PlaIlftillg CommisaioD shaH IJ 0 tho tiDal rg io . /a¡'JjJf€I. III aüthoFÌt). O. Relluiremeøts In erdor te (¡Halif:,' fer !fie fJe€!e8trian amellitie8 illeeJ!ti. e Bellu8, a fJfefJess€! jJrejeet mllst meet the folio illg relJ.Hiremellt8: I) ThB mrnimlIDIlet 8ige for jJrejoots rolJ.liostillg oell8idofatiell fer tho jJeàestriall lIffiellitios IJelllls snail IJe UI,QQQ Sllllare fuet and leeate€! in the TeuFÌBt Retail Cere Distriet, er the fleatillg Sheet Oat Di8triot. . Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document 5>8!et[)tf 'FtiJff Changes in text location are not shown III - 42 Added Text . . . 2) €I. }. € Ilali~ing IJlffila BT eBlI!'t)ar¡ mllBt Be ¡ eBigne¡ aB an integral IJaR 8f the B. efall IJTejeet an¡ mllBt Be BIJe8iiieall) Telate¡ te tlie main eiTelllatiBn IJattem(s) ithin the IJr@jeet. Leit8. eT IJieeeB ef the Bite . high are Bat relate €I te the IJl'ÌmaT) IJe¡ eBman eiTelllatiBn B) Btem mal nBt Be eBlIflte¡ aB € lIaliiie¡ areas. 3) The minim- ¡ imeRBiBn ef aß) Ijllaliiie€l area 8hallBe 15 feet ef har€lse!lf!e matel'Ìal. Path a)s reljllire¡ for nB_al IJe¡ eBtl'Ìan eiTelllatien, 81leh as IJBTehes, area¡ es, aJ1.¡ BtaiR. ells, lfiRj net Be ~ 1) An" € lIaliiie¡ lIfea IlliIst Be eIJen tB the sk) e]leeIJt f8T Bka¡ e trellises an¡ Taah erßangB. Clagg enelB8e¡ gOOTBBmS, ißtel'ÌBT8Bl!ft)ar€lg BT arBBreta lfiRj Ijllali~ if the faeilit:, is Tea¡ il) a. ailaBle tB the general ~ 5) An) € lIl!;liiied area mllBt ineef JeTate Beating, tra¡ itieRal IJa.ing matel'Ìals, sha¡ e trees, aJ1.à'BT trellisss an¡ 1aJ1.¡ 8eaIJing. F8\lI1taiIlß anB 8tkeT f~atareB are als6 highl) eneBllf8geB. €i) fJe8S . high are IJTB. i¡ e¡ f6T the BBle lIse 6f emIJl6) Beg, Bilek 8B IJatiBB, BT b !lBin8BB ellotBmeFS, BlleR as Bllt¡ BBr €lining ar8as Br leBBies, mRj Bat Be eBlIßteB as € 1I8liiieB lIfe8B. 7) }.II !}Ilaliiie¡ IJe¡ e8mlm BIJaee BRallB e Ie Bate¡ at greood lB. el tB a maxim- Bf 5 feet alJe . e grBOO¡ Ie el measllTeB at the nellfast street ellTlJ. All BIlBR BjJaee BRallBe Basil:, aeeessiBle tB tRe general IJIlBlie €lllTÎng nB-al hBinesB RellTB 1i߀l BRBIlM BeB8.fI'ÌeT Hee in terms ef haJ1.¡ ieaIJIJeB 8eeeBS. IB8eBth e IhBIlB 1) FeT e. e1') 299 B!}llare feet Bf IlBeaBIB IJ8¡ 8BmaJ1. IJI!I!!8 eT eBllrtjarB IJTB. i¡ ßB, Bn Bite IJarking Te€ lliTemeßtB m8:' be Te¡ lIee¡ b:, ene IJarking BjJaee, IJrB. iBe¡ that 8 iinBing ean Be maBe that a¡ e€ 1l8te IJarJ¡iøg ill be a. ailaBIB te the IJTBjeet. 2) FBT e. e1')-1 9 IJeTeeßt BnBt area IJrg. iBe¡ in IJlal!aB aJ1.¡ eel!ft)arBB in 8 mj¡¡e¡ IlBe IJmjeet, the m¡¡¡¡jmlill! IJermÌtteB IßBi¡ eßtial ¡ eRBi!) m!t') Be ineTeaseB B:, 1IIßits IJeT sere. 3) The };)ÌfeeteT mil} malle minBT aBjllotm.ents either 1l J.. ar¡ BT ¡ B ro. arB iR tlie aBBe iReeßti e BenliBeB in eTBeT te talle iRte 8BRoÜleratien iffegalarities 8T eBnotl'aints eftllS Bite, leeatieR 8ftke Bite. ithin the 8 crall SIJeeiiie PIaJ1. area, Tel8tienBliiIJ Bfthe IJT@jeett8 aBjaeeßt struetllTes aJ1.B uses, the TeBIJBnoi. eneBS Bfthe IJr@jeet tB the Added Text III - 43 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document J}i!!€iwtl T& ~t Changes in text location are not shown 2. OM Ta'.'Il Desig¡¡ Clli€lelilleB, !!II€l8Il~' athBf Illlil IIB at!FilmteB efthe €Ie daplllellt pfajeet. . 1) Thrallgh the €Ie doplllellt agTBBmBllt pfaBBBB, thB Citj lIla) B811Bi€lBf BthBf illBmNi. BI'H!mlBeB BIlBh aB fB€lIlBtiBII8 ill prBBBS8illg foBs, il!. ]jBIl feBS Bf Iltilitj BBIillBBtiBI!. foBs. Tha BJ!tBl!.t BfsliBh BBI!.IiSBS ma~ IiIJ BII 8 B88B B~ BaSB Basis 8S a fBBIlIt afllogBtiati81!.B BOt' BBIltlw projeet 8ppliBant an!! the Cit~. Hi€l ¡¡IBBk P88Ba rneBl!.ti B a. PUPOBg '.\'ithillthB TBIiRBt Retail DiBtl'ÌBt, it iB €IesiraBle to BII80llfagell1B pm /iBiallBf pB€lBBtl'Ìan pasBB'B at mi€l BIBBk IBBatiBIIS ta pra. i€lB 8al!. 811i811t pB€lCBtI'Ì!!II aBBBSB tB thB BlrBBt HBm pllBliB parkillg lets at the fear eOmil!!illgB. IJ. . ¡¡pro. al }.Iltkori~ ThB Planmllg CammiCBiollah¡¡1l BBthB Hllal fB. iB "lappfB. al!!tlthBRt'J' B. R@quirements . In ar€l@f t B I ualif)' far the lIli€lbl€!Bl[ paBB€! illBellti. B BBIlIiS, a pf8pBBB€I pf8jeet mlIB! meet tßa feIlB\':illg fBl lIifBmBllts: 1) ThB millimllm ..i€lth Bfllllj pasBB pw. i€lB€lIlII€lBf this pwgfaU! Bhall I!.Bt BBIBSB thliIl19 fBct at ¡m~ PBÌIlt. 2) The p aBBB B hall B S €I Bsig¡¡B!! t 0 11 e !III illtebl'a! part 8f II1B B. grail projBBt !Ill!! Bhalll1B BBIIHgurB€I tB pfB. i€lB Blraight fop'. ar€l aOBBSB HBm an alle~ Of fear parlBlIg area tB the Blreet. The illeBf Jorati811 of plll!'iaa jIlt€! thB €Ieaig¡¡ ia highl} BIIBBIIf!lgB€I. ¡¡lIsillesB el!.Ir!!llB8S arB el!.BBllrage!! tB HBl!.t BlltB a paBBB. J) The P!l8B@ shall iI!.BBfJ!BratB l!lll€lsBII '!B featllfBB, lightil!.g, sha€lB, tBnRIrB€I pa il!.g !III€I BthBf €IBsig¡¡ BIBlIlel!.tB tB BnlUlIIBB thB B. Brall pB€lBBtI'Ì!III BI!..ifBI!.IIlBIIt an€l pm.i€le a high Ie BI Bf SBBlll'Ìt~. an!! eBI!. Blliel!.eB. 1) Hi€llJlook pB€lo8t1'Ìan p88Ba8 aftallBl!.]s IJBfJF8. i€lB€I "itml!.lI1B mi€l€llB BI!.B thir€l Bf an~ IJIBek 5) . .'. €Ie. BIBfJmBl!.t ¡¡¡¡rBemBl!.t IJet'" eel!. the Citj !!II€I the prBfJeft} 0 "I!.Br shall BB BlltBrB€I il!.tB €IBseRIJil!.g fBBpBI!.8iIJilitiB8 for mail!.tCI!.!!IIBB an€l BthBr liaBilities Bfthe paaee. Added Text III - 44 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Pelsled Tæct Changes in text location are not shown . . . 3. €I. In@@nti.@ Bonus@s F!!f ¡Jmj@sts meeting tho ab!!.@ f@€lüifomont8, tho f!!II!!..ing ¡ 8.els¡Jm8nt b!!!1.ö888 mil) b@ a ailaIJle: I) ßlIil¡ ingh@ig!¡tmll)'boinofease¡ !!n@ a¡ ¡ iti8nalstOI') I!! am¡¡;limum !!ff-int) (19) feet (1 steRe8). 2) Re€lliÏf8¡ ¡JlIflling ma:, be feoo@@¡ bj 29%, ¡Jr!!' i¡ e¡ that a fm€Iing@1II'l be ma¡ @ that a¡ @€luat@ ¡J1Ifl¡Ïng .. ill b@ a. ailaIJle I!! the ¡Jmjeet. 3) Throüg!¡ th@ €18. d@¡Jm8nt agroemeR! ¡Jf!!@8SS, tho Cit'/ mil) eonsi¡ ef !!thef ineenti.@ b!!!1.öSOS suoh as F8ooetien8 in ¡Jr!!oessing fees, in lieN fcos, !!f ütilit) @!!ItlI@@ti!!n fees. The €;¡t@nt !!f 8l1sh benlls@s ma:, . ar/ 8n a sa8e bj @a8@ b@t'.s@n the pf!!je@t lI 'I¡Jli@lII'lt 1II'l€I th@ Cit;,. R@me 'olen¡!!ne!!nfe_ing Signs IneeR!i. e a. Pül'pOS@ The Cit;, tin¡ s that in 8F¡ ef to Illithentieate the Ol¡ ',',r est theme fer Old T!! ..'!1. it is ¡ esiFab!@ I!! @n@@lIl'IIg@ the f@mo 01 of n!!neenfe_ing 8igna at a Æpi¡ ¡Ja@e. Th@refefe, in Of¡ @fte an@@üfagethBfome.al efn8ne8nfø_ing signs, th@ Cit') mil) 8ffef 0 nera ofneneenfo_ing oigno the wIle ..ingm@efttÏ. @Ot8 Haston thoif Feme. Ill. b. Appl'O all.uthol'i~ Tho Cit) Ceün@i!8hall b@ tho final Fe ..ie...'a¡J¡Jf8. al alitheRt;,. e. Requil'em@nts In of¡ ef I!! €lllalit fer th@ n8ne!!nfo_ing sign fem!! 'al ineeR!i. e, a sign ¡Jf!!¡JeBe¡ t!! be f@m8. e¡ mllst meet tho felle.. ing fe€lllÏfoment8: 1) The sign müst ha. e boon a legal o!!nfel'lfling sign at th@ limo !!f ita ¡Jlaeement. (In eth@f . 8f¡ 8, the sign 88!Æ8t b@ illogal). 2) Th@ 8ign mllst be located in th@ T811fist Retail Cefe ¡JistR@t in the S¡Jeeitie Plan lIfea. 3) The sign Bliall n8t b@ an alJlII'ld!!ne¡J Bign at tho time of a¡Jplieati8n. 1) In th@ granting 8f n8ne!!nfe_ing sign fSm!! . al ino@nti. @8. th@ City ill applj the f~II!!.. ing ¡JRORtj fanl¡Ïng 8@h@¡JIII@: Added Text III - 45 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Ds!/!!teil 'F-8.~t Changes in text location are not shown 1. 0 0 0 0 . Roof8igRs Pole 8igR8 (wee8tamliRg sigR 0 IntemaIl~ ill_iRate!! signa Plastie sigRs er 19' lIigh) !!. IDeeDtiye Program 0 .!!em of Ilelloollfurmillg sigHß mil) at their !!iserotieR elleese to ]JaFtisi]Jato ill the felle l:mg sigH reme al iRseRti e ]Jregrarn. Tile Cit') . ill seleet a lltiIII!Jer ef a]J]Jlioa!lts eaell ~ ear to ]Jartioi]Jate ill tho ]Jregram ¡¡asm! OR the ]JFÏe!Üj'liot efsigHs ]Jre. ido!! $e. e alll! tho a ail$ilit~ offoo!!s. Tile ReRoollformillg sigH Ieme al ineeHti. e ]JIogram is a follf (1) ~ oar plogram oðmmonoillg on the effoeti. 0 !!ate ef tllis ~pooiíie Plan. Tile pIe gram is !!osigHed tð onsoömge tile Iapid Iome al of the least desir$le tY Jes ðf sigHß !Jj JIO i!!ing lafger ineeHti. os in the earl~ ~ ears and tapoFÏng efftð Ile illooHti. eo in tile íi!ìIJ. ~ ear. TlieinseHti.es ..lIielima') ¡¡o JrB idodaroa8felle .s: I) Year one . r'i-ee feme. al of neneenfðmliRg sign. PII)1ftORt ðf an inoonti 'e !Jelluß ef$I,999 fef mef SigHB an!! sigHs, 3:399 fur all others. Fl'ee 8esigH seR iee te pm. ide OðRf-iJflning, attraoti. e Ðlœtelles. ,. JJole sigH 2) Y@ar t¥\ 0 Flee femo . al ef lleRoðRfomling sign. Flee !!eaigH sel'\ iee te JJm. i!!o ooRfðmlÍng, al[otollos. ,. attraoti e SIgH ]) Year three aDd four Flee reme. aI efllðROðRf-ðrming sign ,. F'-.lfJSS ¡UiT tiâpt/Tlt3 t/\ tIlting t.'wTi!ssl. S(f of t.'IS ji Be i&>igH IISI iee Ti!!!st ttgf ee t3 ß!ti!iß<J <I. Iii IJf t.'¡e t/Itemt/ti. e IIkete.'¡S(f pi {; . itkti ani It! ¿¡I 8tJt t/ !¿¡l ~ lIign l~ IIM./ t'//81i (J~\ I1Irmt.'¡1I afl seei. ill&: t!ie IIkøt:3l1 iæigl/II. !fllt/ii I/S1~ lIig;¡ is Tlßt eI8t!tetl, th8 p31 tifJipilnt H iII hE! I So1!!iI ei tø leimkwlls tlis City /31 ths t!33t a/the lIigTl åsaigTl liE!. . it!8. . OM Te ..n Faoa!!e Irn1'!re. emB/it Prð¡¡rarn Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document P8Ie18.:J T~t Changes in text location are not shown III - 46 . . . a. PIII'}lOB@ ThG Citj GfTGrnG@llla, thnmgft the Old To II Faeade HRJlf8 emefitPf€lg>am, . ill Jlf€I ide 110 illteFGst 10BRa to eligiBle Jlf€lJle!'t) 0 . lIeFß BRd gro_d floor tell1lJlt8 to IlJlgrRde the a}lJlearanee of 8t@reH@lIts ill order to helJl ereate a Jlositi.a retail ell.iroIlmGllt ill Old To.l!! Temoollia. LOBR8 d@ hR.e t@ Be FGJlaid t@ the Cit) . Im¡Jf€I. illg BRd IJfIgrRdillg Bllilding faoad08 .:ithill Old To ..'11, esJI@eiRllj in the Tollrist Retail Core, i8 olle of the ilßJ'!oFtant goal8 of this S¡J8ei:lie Plan. The Old To ,,'II Faeadelm¡Jf8. emellt Pf€lgrarn seellB t@ Brillg lie" life to e¡¡i8tillg BllildillgS ill the Tollrist Retail Core. hiGh d@ IIOt eollfu- to the "Old 'y est" de8igtl theme aa 8¡Jeei:lied ill the Desigtl Cllidelille8 ofthia S¡Je8i:lie Plan. ß:, aBsistillg ¡JroJl°Ft:, 0 'IIefS to IlJlgrade the ap¡JeaFooee @ftheirBllildillga, the aesthetie ell. iroIlmefit of Old To ..'R is fuFthar oothalltieatad, thllS im¡Jf€I iRg the eeollomie elimate f~r all merehllJlts BRd the Citj as a "hola. lJ. . }I}II'o':81 }.utliørity Tha Cit) C@oosil shall Ba the :liRal rs is. '.'appf€I al allt!lorit). e. EligilJiIi~ 1) The BuihliRg 811all Be loBated iR the Old To . II S¡Jseiiie Phm area. J) þle" eollotmstioR is lIat aligilJla far assistanss. J) ßllildillg8 ill the Tourist Retail Core di8triet "illlJe gi. ell JlHOritj. 1) ßuilding8 . ith s)[isting rnlllti¡Jls gro Ilnd flMr 8t@f8H@fit8/lJu8ines8es are eligiBle f@rm@re than @ne loan. $) '4'¡Jlie8Rts mllst Be lJoth the BII8ill688 0 lIer Oil tho gre""d floor BRd tae pF@¡JSFt) 0 "liar. If otors!fofit i8 "aeant, pro¡J eFt:, @"nsr m8j lJ s 80le apJ!lieant. Ii) A aapj- aftaa laasa must lJa sulJmittad '" ita tae ap¡JlieatiaR. The laRge p8ri@d should hs P. 0 j OaFS H@rn the date afthe a¡J¡Jlieatiall. Farthe8s ap¡JliollJlts taat da not aa':a an g¡;esutsd lease of a minim 11m af R. 0 j Sill'S hm the data aftae ap¡Jlieatian, tae ¡Jf€lpertj @"lIarmii') !IfJ¡Jlj for l@anfunds if the ¡JropsFt) ð ..nsr sfiter8 ifito an agreement .. ith th6 s_snt tsnllJlt lI@t ta raisa refits more than 5% ¡Jsr j gar for at. OJ ear pariðd Horn the date the atðFsHofit agFe8m8fit ia 8)loauted ( . aeFe no leaae elHfent1j 8JLÍsta) or f@rthe time remaillillg in the po:, ear ¡J6Rod ( hell a lease ia ill effuetj ill order to F666i:8 a loan. Added Text III - 47 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Ps!:;t:;i 'F-8J€t Changes in text location are not shown 7) h!jplieant8 mu8t ,eRi) that !liefe are lie eeds enfsreemBm aetiBn8 e_sml:, astÍ, s against !lie pfSpSrt:, , . 8) If I! Jplisant8 ha, s pfS, iS1l81:, fsssi, sd BII8ins88 18an8 H8m !lie City, !ks payBasl¡ sf!kslS!lll8 must BSII J t8 dats ill8fdsf t8 BS eligiBle f8f Fasadslmpfs, smsnt Prsgram. <;') f. s8ntra8t .. ill Be 8igr18d 1'1:, !lis tenant, !lis pf8pS¥!) 8 .'IISF,!IIId !lis City Bsf<'lrs M applisant i8 eligiBle t8 fessi, sl8an fund8, f.tJplisant i8 n8t 1B Begin !Illy .. 8f ¡ Be¡ofs!lis ssflÌFast is apprB . sd and sigllsd 1'1;, ~ €I, Eligillls Imflro"emeR1s T:, Jle8 8f iml'IfB ,smsm8 .. hish are eligiBle.. i!li 18an ftrnd8 are: pailltillg sf emirs Bllilding faeade 8fld 8ide8 efBuildillg .isiBle Hsm 8trset (all painted 811fÍaSS8 are rs! lIif8d 1s BS fepaimed), a ming8, mar! USS8, parapet alia, deef8, .. ind8 ,8, arsa€le,'sanep:, ¡a8ade and di8plllj .. illd8 , ligkting, tile, pa. em8nt BeÌ'.. sen €Is Sf 8Rd sid8 RIll, signß, IIfld s!lief fasade iR!flfs"smems appf8, sd 1'1:, Cit). f:ei8mis retr8Mttillg (sÌf1leÌlil'aIlIfIgm.de) i8 eligiBle srn) 811 fss8g11i!'isd hiBtSRS maB8I1f) Bllildillgs ill Old Ts 'iI- All iR!flf8, emsnt8 mll8t BS I! JpnJ ed By !lis Cit). . e, IReligillls Imflro, smaRts Maimenanee t)JlS iR!flf8, smentB Blleh a8 f88Mng, landBsaping, !!lid g8nefal 81ruetllral (list s8iBmi8) II Jgrads im 'lfS emmHS ar8 118t 81igiBI8 fer leans. '.II intsR8f iR!flf8 ,emsm8 (e¡ws 'lt di8plll) .. ind8.. lightmg:) arB insligiBk f, boaR Program "N8 8f Ie.. imef8Bt 18MB mil) Bs made t8 eligiBle I! Jplis!lllts te iR!flFB, s Bllilding fusadsB ill Old T8 .'ft, The repaym811t 8f!lisl88RS shall Be mads ill ItBSBrd!lllBe .. i!li !lis fB! lIirsment8 s8taBli8hed 1'1:, !lie Cit) C811nBiI. LB!IIIB ar8 a ailabl8, II J ts a;l1,QQQ.QQ 'ISf 81igi"'18 atsf8H8l1t, ill aBB8fdanes ilh the fu1l8.. ing fB8tFÌBtisnß: I) .bsan fund8 sfll J ts æ3,QQQ.()Q ma:,' Be grllflted ¡ef paintiJlg 8Rd e!lief eligiBle iR!flfs emeRts; 2) hlditÍsJlal188R fund8 8f II J t8 æ2,QQQ,()Q mIl:' B e gi, BII ifa mings, marquBs, arsade, eIlfl8p), Sf 811J1SSJltr81 dB iBB8 arB t8 BB iJlBlllded; . J) :.dditiBllallellll fuJld8 sfap ts $2,QQ(),Q() mil) Bs gi. ell fur I! Jpf8, sd SJlteRef fasade and .. iJld8 . di8plll'j lightillg; Added Text III - 48 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document D:Û3t3ti T-a it Changes in text location are not shown . . . 1) 5) 9 ef IImlllbs ,'e tlw lollft fuftRBReselWeRllbs, e, IIRRititmaJ.~ IslIft fundß ðfü 'J tð $3,599.99 mil) be a ailable; IIftd 1.0 IIftB ðh 'J ts $11,999 mll) be gi, ell fur URU Beiomie fetrstittillg. g, Program RequirementB J) h. I) I4I 'Jlie!ll!tB IIfB to Resignate slle J81'80D ""hs \, ill be a 'J 'Jlie!ll!t's esDtaet 'JefBsD fer this 'JfBjeet. The esDtaet 'Jef8sD DstitieB all stlwf a 'J 'JliellDtB sflbe time and Rate fer Resign meetiDgB, 1.11 im 'JrB emeDtB mü8t b e a 'JprB eR iD all, anBB b:, the PhmruDg De 'JartmeDt, OTLIm, IIftd poBBibl) !tie PIIII.RiDg CsmmiBBisD EdepeDRiDg SD 1.e, el sfRe ie' fB! uiremeDto), J) .\fI 'Jlie!ll!tß ofmülti 'Jle BtsfeReDtB i!bill a btlÎlRiDg life eDeolD'aged ts elk together ts feeei. e eDB Bet efbidB fer eDtiFe büildiDg. ThiB ..ill fedüee!tie eeBt 'Jef st8leKsDt. l<fI 'Jlieant iB ts f8eBi,e t\.s .FitteD bills Ksm liecD8eR eeDtfaBtÐfß to eðllstfllet!tie :,efh, 1) :\.11 . SH, m1l8t be eeDBtmeteR b:, eeD!¥8etel'8 liecD8eR b:, !tiB 5:tate ef Califømia, The a J 'Jlieant BeleetB the eøDtfaetøf IIDd is fea JÐDBibiB fur Bøm¡JletiDg an:, agreemeDts i!ti !tie eøDtfaetsf fur all im¡JrB . ementB, 5) l<fI 'Jlieants are fBBpÐDBillle fer øbt!IÎDiDg lJiR8, eeleetillg a eøDtraBtef, IIDR ß¡¡eBHtiDg agreemeDtB ith eøDtraetSfß, Cit) 8taff ',,¡ill DÐt pfe iRe aBei8tllDee iD Sbt!IÎDiDg bids .. haD fel lleBteR b:, A 'J 'Jliellßt, é) PaiDteR1JuilRiDgB (.... hieh DeeR fe 'J!lÎDtingj ":ith a 'J¡JrB eR eøløfB life f€! IIifeR ts 1J e fe 'JaiDted tlI1def thiB ¡JrB gram aB !tie tifBt im¡JfØ . cmeDt fuftRed .. ith AgeDe) IBan [¡!DRB. .A.ltef p!IÎDtiDg, ethef eligible im¡JfØ, emeDtB ellD be funded ith femailliDg fllBRB. :) Re! üifemeDtB life B~eet to ehange, '. ~teflily ~tefl CHide fur . flfIlieant8 See l"fI 'JBDRi¡¡ I f<lf a Btap B:, step gniRB iD esm¡Jletmg all efthe BtapBlleeeß Bill) ts feeBi e a tiDaneiallsan Kom the Cit) sfTBmeelila f<Jf m¡teFier faeade iIDflfð BmBDtB üDRef the Old To :D FaeaRe Im 'JfO, emeDt Pfsgrarn. Added Text III - 49 Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document fJ8J8tsi T8!!t Changes in text location are not shown H. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS . The followin2 re2nlations apply within all land nse districts in the Old Town Specific Plan area. 1. Land Use Determinations. Whenever a particular type of land use is not listed in Table III-I, the Director ofPlannin2 shall determine ifthat nnspecified land use is consistent with the overall intent of the district, in which the use is proposed; and is consistent with other permitted or conditional uses in that district. The Director's determination shall be final. 2. Nonconformin2 Uses and Structures. Where, at the time of passa2e of this Specific Plan. a lawful use of land or structure exists which would not be permitted bv the re2ulations imposed bv this Specific Plan. such use or structure may be continued indefinitely unless one ofthe followin2 is involved: 0 If the nonconformin2 use vacates the property and the nonconformin2 use is not reestablished within one year. the use shall not be reestablished. 0 If the nonconformin2 use voluntarily vacates the property after the year 2013 for any reason, a nonconformin2 use shall not be reestablished. . 0 If more than 50% 0 fan onconformin2 structure is d ama2ed or destroyed, the nonconformin2 structure shall not be reestablished. 0 If more than 25%, but less than 50%. of a nonconformin2 structure is dama2ed or destroyed, the structure may be replaced if the exterior of the repaired structure substantially conforms to the architectural standards contained in Section IV of this Specific Plan. 3. Adaptive Re-use Parkin2 Waiver. In order to preserve historic or unique existin2 buildin2s in the Old Town Specific Plan area, additional off-street parkin2 shall not be required for the use or intensification of use for these buildin2s. These desi2nated historic buildin2s and structures are identified in the Old Town Historic Preservation District Ordinance (Section V.C of the Specific Plan). 4. Public Ri2ht-of- Way Encroachments. In order to accomplish the overall desi2n theme required bv this Specific Plan, it may be appropriate to allow certain buildin2 accessories (e.2. awnin2s, trellises, stairs to porches, or proiectin2 si2ns) to encroach into the public ri2ht-of-wav. The Director may approve such encroachments under the Development Plan approval process provided in the Development Code. . Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes from the Original Document Ea!8t8i F::Ht Changes in text location are not shown Ill- 50 . . . 5, Temporary Use Permits. Permits for temporary uses in the Old Town area shall conform with the provisious of Section 17.04.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code except that the outdoor displav and sales of merchandise. customarily sold by the permaneut Old Town business. is limited to four events per year. Each event is not to exceed four (4) consecutive days. 6. Setback Area Encroachments. Adjustments to setback requirements of up to 25% may be approved or conditionally approved by the Director ofPlanniu!! if it can be demonstrated that the encroachment is otherwise compatible with the Specific Plan, and will enhance the overall appearance of the project or serve a particular useful function for the !!eneral public. Common examples of these encroachments include awnin!!s, canopies. marquees, trellises. stairs. and other similar desirable architectural items. 7. Violations. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this ordinance. Any person violatin!! any provision of this 0 rdinance shall b e deemed !!uilty of an infraction or misdemeanor as hereinafter specified. Such person shall be deemed !!uilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof durin!! which any violation of any of the provisions of this ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted. Any person so convicted shall be. !!uilty of an infraction offense and punished by a fine not exceedin!! $100.00 for a first violation: and !!uilty of an infraction offense and punished by a fine not exceedin!! $200.00 for a second infraction. A third and any additional violation shall constitute a misdemeanor offense and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 or 6 months in jail, or both. Notwithstandin!! the above, a first offense may be char!!ed and prosecuted as a misdemeanor. Payment of any penalty herein shall not relieve a person from the responsibility for correctin!! any violation. Added Text Old Town Specific Plan Changes/rom the Original Document Delete' T~ et Changes in text location are not shown III-51 D. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS This section contains the development standards tables for the Specific Plan. Table III- 2 contains the site and development standards for the Highway Tourist Commercial (HT), Community Commercial (CC), and Tourist Retail Core (TRC) Land Use Districts. Table III-3 contains the site and development standards for the Tourist Serving Residential (TSR), Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), Old Town Civic (OTC), and the Open Space (OS) Land Use Districts. Table m-2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMMERCIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS I HT I TRC CC Lot Size and Densitv Minimum Lot Area (square feet) I 10,000 3,500 8,000 Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre 0 122 0 Lot Dimensions Minimum Width at Required Front Setback Area 60 feet 25 feet 60 feet Minimum Corner Lot Width 100 feet 50 feet 60 feet Minimum Depth 80 feet 80 feet 80 feet Minimum Frontage at Front Property Line 80 feet 25 feet 60 feet Setbacks Minimum Front Yard 25 feet O' o' Maximum Front Yard N/A 10 feet' 20 feet Minimum Corner Side Yard 10 feet 0 0 Minimum Interior Side Yard 0 0 0 Minimum Rear Yard 10 feet 0 10 feet Minimum Accessory Building to Interior Side Yard 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Building Separation 0 0 0 Other Maximum Stories/Height 3/50 feet 3/50 feet 2/30 feet Maximum Lot Coverage 70% 100% 70% Minimum Required Landscaped Open Space 20% 0%' 10% Maximum Fence, Wall or Hedge Height 6 feet 6 feet 6 feet Minimum Private Open SpacefUnit N/A IsO sq. ft. N/A I. This requirement does not apply to existing legal lots. 2. On the upper floors and in the rear lot areas only. 3. Building shall be setback exactly ten feet if no covered arcade or porch is provided at the front of the building. . If a continuous porch or arcade (minimum 8 feet wide) is provided at back of sidewalk , (public right-of-way) Limited accent landscaping should be provided whenever possible. Old Town Specific Plan III-ll . . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.6 NEW MATEFUAL ADDED TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPAO3-0158\Slaff Repnrt PCI.dot 19 '-'- I ., '--"""""-"£:~~-",--~_.:..'. :::':";&-Oo_:~,:.r;.-";-:~~~_O'-~-"-' ~"""-_.. . . . C. SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 2. Commercial Site Planning Guidelines Guideline 5 - Detached Accessorv Buildin!!s . Detached accessory buildings shall be placed on permanent foundations and constructed of materials and painted with colors that are compatible with the main building. The designated use 0 f a commercial detached accessory building shall be appurtenant to the use of the main building and located on the site based on its design and function. Detached accessory buildings shall be subject to the architectural guidelines and development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan and meet all applicable City of Temecula building and fire codes. . . Guideline 6 - Fences and Walls . All fencing and wall materials utilized within the commercial districts of the Old Town Specific Plan Districts shall be compatible with the architectural theme of the adjacent building. Stacked river or natural rock, battered base walls and the traditional look of wrought iron are appropriate as well as western style wood fencing where applicable. Such structures should not act as a visual barrier to a building, porch or ftont yard. Use of indigenous and local historical materials such as granite for walls and fences is strongly encouraged. Incorporation of wall caps and pilasters at entry points can also be utilized where these treatments are indicated. Fencing should encourage an open commercial and residential neighborhood atmosphere, while providing a definition between public and private spaces, through the use of walls, fences and hedges around ftont yard areas. . . . Architectural features such as garden walls, arbors and trellises are ideal to soften building mass and should be an integral part of the building. However, it is important to avoid a tacked on appearance to hide poor massing and architecture. Chain link and bare precision block or other concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls are not permitted fencing materials. Decorative wrought iron or rough-hewn wooden gates used to accentuate a fence, wall or building are permitted. Detailing of column pilasters with tile or appropriate decoration representing Western, Spanish ColoniallMission, Monterey or other period appropriate style elements are desirable. . . . Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV Guideline 7 - Trellises and Shade Structures . . Trellises should be constructed of materials compatible with the architectural character of the adjacent building. Heavy rough-hewn timber covered with vines is encouraged. Natural wood or neutral tone colors from the Sherwin-Williams Preservation Palette should be utilized. Covered walkways and shade structures associated with a building should adhere to the design elements of that structure. Materials such as brick, local stone, adobe block and stucco, in the case of Spanish Colonial/Mission, Monterey, Western or period-appropriate styles, combined with natural timber and rough-hewn beams are recommended. Ground level landscaping and wrap-around vines are encouraged to soften the look of these structures. . . Guideline 8 - Gutters and Downspouts . Gutters and downspouts on the exterior of buildings in the commercial districts should utilize designs consistent with the turn-of-the-century time period represented in Old Town. Materials used shall be color coordinated with the building they are attached to. Roof scuppers should not be placed in areas that are visible from the street or other public places. . Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV . . . Guideline 9 - Awninl!s . Awnings can add color, relief and protection of pedestrian and patrons from the elements. They also can provide a setting for signage. The use of awnings to delineate building entries and help orient pedestrians to business locations is encouraged. Awning care and maintenance should be conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines. The useful life of a typical awning does not exceed eight (8) to ten (10) years. (A property owner should not contemplate the installation of these structures unless they are willing to replace them every eight (8) to ten (10) years.) All awnings within the Old Town Specific Plan area should be regularly maintained and kept free of fading, stains and tears. Colors of awnings shall be monotone hues selected from the Sherwin- Williams Preservation Palette and coordinated with the architecture of the building they are attached to. Awnings can be imprinted with simple signage in accordance with the provisions of the Sign Standards and Guidelines detailed in this Specific Plan. Lettering style and size should be in scale with the awning on which the sign is located as well as any adjacent awnings. Awnings should be made of high quality cloth (plastic, aluminum and vinyl material are not permitted) and be at least seven (7) feet high at the lowest point so as not to impede pedestrian traffic. Awnings should not be wrapped around buildings in a continuous band. Instead, these structures should be used to enhance the façade b y placing them on top of doors, windows and other openings. Awnings should not be so massive as to dominate the façade but should be in scale with the rest of the building. If I ighted, awnings should be illuminated with period a ppropriate fixtures such as goosenecks. . . . . . . . . Guideline 10 - Pocket Parks In an effort to provide landscape breaks along the commercial streets of Old Town, a series of pocket parks in the form of pedestrian spaces, arcades as well as mid-block paseos and courtyards need to be provided. These areas can allow transitions between commercial buildings in addition to providing a setting for public art, seating, drinking fountains, and shade structures. Buildings and/or landscape elements surrounding a pedestrian space on a minimum of two sides typically define an area as a pocket park. . Appropriate design elements such as gateways, trellises, architecturally designed lighting and seat walls should be used to create a series of seating areas for pedestrians throughout Old Town. Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV . Columns and ornamental entry gates using native stone, iron or rough sawn timber are encouraged. Permanent outdoor seating for pocket parks can be incorporated into decorative masonry structures or architecturally compatible benches of native stone or brick and shall complement adjacent buildings and landscaped areas. Landscaping designs should follow the Old Town Specific Plan Guidelines. Pocket parks should be publicly accessible during daylight hours and linked to adjacent streets and sidewalks. . . . . . Typical Pocket Park Amenities Typical Street Corner Pocket Park . Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV . . . . . . . . Typical Courtyard Details Guideline 11- Vendin!! Machines Vending machines should be located along the face of a building or against a structure designed to accommodate them. Each machine shall be framed on the sides and top in rough-hewn wood or other period appropriate materials compatible with the adjacent building it is placed against. Vending machines should not occupy more than ten percent (10%) of the length, maximum twenty (20) feet, of any wall facing a street or access road. They should not obstruct private pedestrian walkways. A minimum of forty-four (44) inches shall be kept clear of obstruction. Additional space may be needed if pedestrian traffic volume warrants. Vending machines are not allowed on the public right of way. Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV 3. Residential Site Planning Guidelines . Guideline 6 - Fences and Garden Walls . Residential areas should limit front yard fencing to materials compatible with the principal dwelling or multi-unit residential building and surrounding development. Simple wrought iron, cast iron, welded steel and substantial wood pickets painted a light color are options. . . Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV . . . F. LIGHTING GUIDELINES The public sidewalks, places and alleys, exteriors, roofs, outer walls and fences of buildings and other structures and signs visible ITom any public street, place or position in the Old Town shall not be illuminated by any other illumination except as pennitted herein; Guideline 1 - General Lie:htine: Guidelines The following general lighting guidelines shall be followed in Old Town: . When full color recognition is needed, high pressure sodium lights should be used in public spaces. Neon is not pennitted in the Tourist Retail Core and Tourist Serving Residential Land Use Planning Districts. . Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV G. PUBLIC ART GUIDELINES . The placement of public art within the Old Town Specific Plan Area is encouraged on both private and public property. Public art gives a community an identity that can be representative of a City's culture and heritage in addition to promoting social gathering places and interaction. Wall murals, lighting displays, sculptures, mosaics, monuments and fountains are all considered significant examples of artistic expression. Proposals for public art are subject to review by the Old Town Local Review Board and must comply with the following guidelines. Guideline 1 - Location . Public art should be situated in highly visible places throughout the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. Public art is encouraged in all gathering areas. Locations such as pocket parks or specifically designed settings to accommodate particular art pieces are ideal. . . Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV . . . Guideline 2 - Symbolic Content . Examples of public art in Old Town should relate to and represent the rich legacy of the Temecula Valley. Literal and abstract representations of local historical and old western elements are appropriate. Guideline 3 -Mosaics and Murals . The pictorial designs of these artistic works should compliment the color and architectural composition of the buildings on which they are painted as well as that of adjacent structures. Ideal facades for murals are exposed fire or windowless walls that are two or more floors in height. Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV Guideline 4 - Sculptures and Monuments . . Pieces selected should be representative of historical figures and events related to the Temecula Valley. Employment of iron, rough-hewn wood and native rock materials are desirable as a part of the presentation. ~'.""";"':'" ...J '.. 0" , t« ., '. ..4<>' . . "., ,;1';,' . Guideline 5 - Lil!htinl! Displavs . Lighting used as an artistic display should employ the same standards as fountains and use tum-of-the-century genre fixtures. They can also be constructed with works of sculpture, monuments and water features. . Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV . . . Guideline 6 - Fountains . Water features in the form of above or below-ground fountains should enhance the surrounding architecture and, as historically appropriate, utilize materials from the Western, Monterey, Spanish/Colonial/Mission and other period-appropriate styles represented in the Architectural Style Guidelines (Section IV-B) of this Specific Plan. They are also recommended for open courtyard and passage spaces to provide relief in hot weather Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV H. OUTDOOR DINING/SIDEWALK FURNITURE GUIDELINES . Outdoor patio furniture and umbrellas used with restaurants and other commercial uses within the Old Town Specific Plan are considered an integral part of the street scene. As a result, period-appropriate street side fumishings as outlined in the following guidelines are required. Guideline 1 - Furniture . All outdoor furniture (tables, chairs, serving stands and bars) shall be of high-quality, durable, and suitable for outdoor use. Wood, metal and natural looking materials are encouraged. Outdoor furniture should be in scale and consistent with both the architectural style and colors of the adjacent building facade. . Guideline 2 - Umbrellas . Umbrellas shall be made of high quality canvas material (not plastic, vinyl or aluminum) and be tall enough to allow pedestrian access. Umbrella colors should be monotones selected from the Sherwin-Williams Preservation Palette and be coordinated with the paint and architecture of adjacent buildings. Multi-colored designs are to be avoided. No signs or other types of advertising shall be printed on umbrellas, except for the name ofthe establishment on the umbrella valance. Umbrellas should be traditional market style designs that integrate well with adjacent building architecture. . . . . . Wood and metal multi-post canopy structures used with fabric umbrellas are pennitted where historically appropriate. Review by the Old Town Local Review Board is required for these installations. Aluminum easy-ups are prohibited except where used in conjunction with an approved special event. . . Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV . . . J. SIGN DESIGN GUIDELINES Guideline 3 - Sil!n Color . Where pictorial artwork is used in a design, multiple colors may be used for that portion of the sign. Colors used in registered corporate logos and trademarks should be matched to the closest tones of the Sherwin-Williams preservation Palette when possible. . Guideline 6 - Wall Mounted Siens . Additional smaller building signs containing the name of the business should be located at rear entrances when they are routinely used by customers. K. STREETSCAPE GUIDELINES This Section contains guidance on the anticipated streetscape improvements as well as the requirements for street furniture and other streetscape elements. The dominant elements of the streetscape for Old Town will be street/sidewalk hardscape, building signage and street furniture. The purpose of streetscape improvements for Old Town is to promote a high quality historic image that serves to enhance the visual experience of the area for tourists and residents alike. The preservation of the pedestrian scale and the relationship of buildings to streets are important criteria in the Old Town area. The initial streetscape improvements along Old Town Front Street and a portion of Main Street were completed in November 1998. An environment oriented to the pedestrian should be concerned with meeting not only functional needs, but also sensory needs throughout the provision of a network of simple, well-defined and well-proportioned outdoor s paces. In an effort to ensure a 1900-era experience, it is important not to over-plan the streetscape as turn of the century streetscapes were often simple, uncluttered, and less fonnal than contemporary streetscape programs. In addition, fonnalized street trees were not a major component ofturn of the century streetscapes. Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV 4. Street Furniture c. Newspaper Racks All newspaper racks located with the boundaries of the Old Town Specific Plan, except for the Highway Tourist Planning Area, that are installed after the effective date of the Specific Plan shall either be constructed of rough- hewn wood stained dark or painted with a neutral color selected from the Sherwin-Williams Preservation Palette, or surrounded by a similarly constructed wooden facade. In order to maintain an uncluttered streetscape, newspaper racks should be placed adjacent to buildings and painted or stained with compatible colors. The design of the newspaper racks and facades must be hannonious with the Turn-of-the-Century look. Newspaper racks shall not located in locations that block emergency access, crosswalk entrances, handicapped access facilities, and store entrances. Lengthy concentrations of newspaper racks is discouraged to minimize obstacles to pedestrian movement. The number of individual newspaper dispenser in each rack should not exceed four. Old Town Specific Plan Changes - New Material Added to Section IV . . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.7 PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentSIPA03-0158\Staff Report PCl.dot "'-'-^~~^C~~< -<;-,%"",",-;';'--"~<." 20 -,,-(,,--~........._< ~~"; .~ l~~~;¡;~;<:: ~~,. - Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Exhibit 111-1 Proposed Land Use Districts Map CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL HT HIGHWAY TOURIST OTC CIVIC TRC TOURIST RETAIL CORE TSR TOURIST SERVING COMMERCIAL os OPEN SPACE MDR MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDEN11AL HDR HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 400 400 11 N BOO Feel clgls\k..n'an:,,__- -" -""'I'O'Ød -'a"<'- use..... . ATTACHMENT NO.8 . EXISTING LAND USE PLAN . R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPAO3-0158\StaffReport !'C1.do! 21 ~~;';-..~:;;ë:",;;¡¡;,,"C'-'.I¡¡;~...>...._,- ~i... ~ -..._~. ;.~:;':,-:.. ..","~;¡¡'t.:~~;,;..:. ATTACHMENT NO.8 . . (:$. ~ ~ HTC Highway Tourist Commercial OTC Civic CC Communltý Commercial . TSR TourlstServlng Residential TRC Tourist Retail Core . CCTS Community Commercial & Tourist Support HDR High Density Residential MDR Medium Density Residential. . OS Open Space TSO The Shootout Zone (Floating ZOne) . ..~ M-rl& . . . ATTACHMENT NO.9 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED PERMITTED USE MATRIX CHANGES R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPA03-0158\StaffRepon PC1.dot 22 ::';'_::_::~';;t~-~í£-;;~_-~_--~ - , '",- - "",,;tF¡ '~--'1'ä:i~.-,-- -_:~;;"'------;~'2C'C-_"-<-'-~_-c:_-- . . . ATTACHMENT NO.9 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED PERMITTED USE MATRIX CHANGES The specific changes to the land use matrix are as follows: 1. Permit Self Service Car Wash in the Community Commercial zone, 2. Permit Gift Novelty, Souvenirs, Ice Cream and Yogurt Shops/Soda Fountains, Insurance, Brokers, and Services, Luggage and Leather Goods, and Real Estate Offices in the Highway Tourist Commercial zone, 3. Permit Laboratories, medical and dental to the Tourist Retail Core (on non-Front and Main Street locations), 4. Permit Wedding Chapel in the Old Town Civic zone, 5. Delete Bicycle Rental businesses from the Old Town Civic zone, 6. Delete the listings for Mini-Mall, Multi-tenant Merchant Marts, and Shopping Centers. These are styles of retail buildings not types of business. 7. Delete the listing for Post Office. The following are land use matrix listings are being proposed for deletion from the Plan: 8. "Financial Institution" (Bank, Financial Institution will remain.) 9. "Formal wear" (Clothing and Apparel Sales will remain.) 10. "Knit Shops" (Sewing Supplies and Fabrics will remain.) 11. "Legal Service" (Professional and Medical Offices will remain.) 12. "Medical Laboratories" (Laboratories, including film, medical and dental will remain.) 13. "Motel" (Hotel/Motel will remain) 14. "Nail Shops" (Beauty Shop will remain.) 15. "Record, Tape & Video Stores (Including rental)" (Phonographic/CD/tape/record store as well as Video Sales and Rentals will remain.) 16. "Rental Equipment" (Equipment Sales and Rental will remain.) 17. "Service Station" (Auto Service Station will remain.) 18. "Pool and Spa Sales" and "Spa Sales" (Swimming Pool and Spa, Sales and Supplies will remain) 19. "Television, Radio, & Electronic Component Sales" (Radio and TV Sales will remain.) R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPAO3-0158\Stlff Report !'C1.dot 23 . . . ATTACHMENT NO. 10 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY R~OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPAO3-0l58\Staff Repon PCI.dot 24 .-"~~- City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589.9033 Pro'ect Title Lead Agency Name and Address Contact Person and Phone Number Project Location Project Sponsor's Name and Address General Plan Designation Zonin Description of Project rrounding Land Uses and Setting R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA03-01581lnitial Study.doc Environmental Checklist Amendment to the Old Town S City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 David Ho an, Princi al Planner 909 694-6400 Old Town Temecula, generally located south of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, and north of Santia 0 Road/First Street City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Community Commercial (CC), High Density Residential (H), Medium Density Residential (M), Low Medium Density Residential (LM), Public Institutional PI, and 0 en S ace OS S ecific Plan SP-5 The Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) was originally approved in 1994 and received appropriate environmental review at that time. This proposed amendment represents the first comprehensive review and reconsideration of the initial plan. The proposed amendments do not change the current direction or vision for the Old Town area or convert rural areas to areas of urban development. Instead these changes update the Plan and incorporate additional design guidelines. The proposed changes to the OTSP are listed below. Update the information on the urban infrastructure plans. Delete duplicate land uses from the permitted use matrix. . Add supplemental design standards for public art, outdoor dining areas, detached structures, fences, walls, awnings, pocket parks, vending machines, and signage. Modify the. Land Use Map as follows: 0 Expanded the Tourist Retail Core to both the north and the south (including the elimination of the Community CommercialfTourist Support area; 0 Added the southeast corner of Rancho California Road and Old town Front Street into the OTSP; and, 0 More clearly delineates the location of the existing channel for Murrieta Creek. Update the historic structure inventory. Delete the original implementation program. This analysis evaluates the potential impacts to the environment from the proposed changes to the Old T own Specific Plan. No specific development proposals are being considered as part of this amendment, as a result, speculative proposal specific impacts are not bein considered. Old Town Temecula is located within a substantially built up urban area and is surrounded b residential, commercial and industrial land. None. Page 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ,¡" Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: ,¡" I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the ro'ect ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards. and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired, but it must anal e onl the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are im bsed u on the ro sed ro'ect, nothin further is re uired. 5' /'2-3 /2. 00 4- Date' , For . R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PAO3-0158\lnitial Study.doc Page 2 a. b. c. d. AESTHETICS. Would the project: IssuesandSu rtin lOformätionSources Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic hi hwa ? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or uali of the site and its surroundin s? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adverse I affect da or ni httime views in the area? No 1m act ,;' ,;' Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Ineo orated Less Than Significant lin act ,;' ,;' Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. As a result, the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan will not have an adverse impact on aesthetics and no significant impacts are anticipated to the environment. 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether Impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a. be c. Issues'andBu rtin .¡nformätiOnSources Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-a ricultural use? Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-a ricultural use? Potentially Significant tm'act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Inco orated No 1m act Less Than Significant lin act ,;' ./ ,;' Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. The area of the Old Town Specific Plan is urban and contains no agricultural lands. As a result, the proposed amendment to the Plan will have no impact to agricultural resources and no significant impacts are anticipated. . R:IOTSPIPlan Amendments\PA03'01581Initial Study.doc Page 3 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Pnl~nti.'ly $ignifieant Unless Less Than Significant Miligation Significant No Issues and SupPOrtinoJnfO""ationSourœ. 'mbacl IncorØorated I",Qact Impact a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air ./ I Qual~lan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to ./ an existing or projected air quality violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any ./ criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ./ concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ./ of people? . Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other prop.osed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter . the anticipated future development in this area. As a result, air quality conditions in this area will not change because of these amendments and no new significant aesthetic impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? a. Issues and Su ronlnfO""ation,sourCes Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans. policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to. marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal. filling, hydrological interru tion, or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or im ede the use of native wildlife nurse sites? Less Than Significant 1m act No 1m act ./ b. ./ c. ./ d. ./ . R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmenlslPA03-01561lnilial Study.doc Page 4 . BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? e. Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Potentially Signiticant 1m act potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Inco rated No 1m act ,/ Less Than Significant 1m act f. ,/ Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. The proposed changes will not change how biologic resources within this area are addressed. The area of the Old Town Specific Plan is urban and is not expected to contain significant biologic resources, except along the edge of Murrieta Creek. As appropriate, biological assessments will be required when specific development proposals are submitted for these areas. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Is$(¡esahdSu ninlhformationSources Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeolo ical resource ursuant to Section 15064.5? Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or uni ue eolo ic feature? Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation loco orated No 1m act ,/ Less Than Significant 1m act b. ,/ c- ,/ d. ,/ Comments: The Old Town Specific Plan was originally developed to protect locally significant historic resources in the Old Town area and provide detailed design guidelines to maintain the character of the area. The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The proposed Amendment to the Plan will consolidate all historic preservation requirements into a single s ection and strengthen penalties for illegally destroying historic structures. The majority of the modifications to the Specific Plan represent clarifications of the existing plan or typographic corrections and will not affect cultural resources. As future development occurs within the Old Town area, there is a possibility that buried cultural and historic resources may be identified. However, the potential for this discovery, and any appropriate mitigation measures, will be. addressed when specific development proposals are considered. As a result, no new significant cultural resource impacts are anticipated. R:\OTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPAO3-0158\lnitial Study.doc Page 5 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: '..ue. and Su rtinlnfPcmaUonSou""s Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, includin the risk of loss, in'u ,or death involvin : Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geolo S ecial Publication 42. ii. Stron seismic round shakin ? iii. Seismic-related round failure, includin Ii uefaction? iv. Landslides? b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral s readin ,subsidence, Ii uefaction or colla se? Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or ro ert ? Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? a. d. e. No 1m act ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ . Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. The proposed amendments will not change how these concerns are currently addressed. As a result, no new significant geologic impacts are anticipated. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a. b. c. IssuesandSu . . rtin Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existin or proposed school? R:\OTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA03-0158\lnitial Study.doc less Than Signißcant 1m act No 1m act ./ ./ ./ . Page 6 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: d, Issues and So rtinlrifounatlon Sources Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a si nificant hazard to the ublic or the environment? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the ro'ect area? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workin in the ro'ect area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation Ian? Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? PotentiallY Signitlcant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Inco rated Less Than Significant 1m act No 1m act ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' ,¡' 8mments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor difications to the approved Specific Plan, The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. As a result, no new impacts from hazards and hazardous materials are expected. e. f. g- h. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a, b. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge re uirements? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not su ort existin land uses? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? c. R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA03-01581lnitial Study,doc LessThan Significant 1m act No 1m act ./ ./ ,¡' ./ Page 7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: e. Issues and Sli In Information Sources Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of olluted runoff? Otherwise substantiall de rade water uali ? Place housing within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Ma or other flood hazard delineation ma ? Place within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area structures which would im ede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Inundation b seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Uniess MitigatiOn Inco orated No 1m act ,í Less Than Significant 1m act f. g. ,í ,í h- ,í ,í ,í Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. Murrieta Creek is currently receiving flood control protection improvements that will remove any 100-year flood hazards from the area. These improvements, which are being carried out by the Riverside County Flood Control District, were not known when the original plan was. approved. As a result, no significant hydrologic or water quality impacts are anticipated as a result of these changes. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a. b. c. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Inco rated Less Than Signfficant 1m act No 1m act ,í ,í Issues andSli' rtin . nfótrnation$olilCes Ph sicall divide an established communi. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the ur ose of avoidin or miti atin an environmental effect? Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? ,í Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. The Old Town area is located between Interstate 15 and the escarpment of the Santa Ana Mountains. When the OTSP was first approved, the Old Town area was physically divided by Murrieta Creek. .Since that time the City has constructed an additional bridge to better. connect the two sides of Old Town. The proposed Specific Plan amendments continue to propose an additional bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek that will further tie the community together. Consequently, the amendments to the Specific Plan will not result in the physically division of this area. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA03-0158\lnitial Study.doc Page 8 The Old Town Specific Plan was developed concurrently with the City's first General Plan. Both documents were developed so that the Old Town Specific Plan would be consistent with the General Plan when it was 8;>pted. The proposed modifications to the Specific Plan do not change the degree of consistency with the _neral Plan. The Old Town Specific Plan continues to be a significant part of the City's historic preservation program. The Specific Plan retains the current historic preservation provisions and non-format related changes strengthen the City's ability to protect historic resources. The City, in conjunction with the County of Riverside, has recently approved a Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Program for t he Western Riverside County Area. No habitat reserve areas are located within the OTSP. The Plan does identify the need for wildlife corridors along Murrieta Creek. This issue is being addressed in the design of the Murrieta Creek flood control improvements. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Slgnifici!ntUnless Less Than SignifiCant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Suooortinojnformalion Sources hilOact IncorDorated Imoact Imoacl a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource ../ that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral ../ resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, soecific plan or other land use alan? Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the "sting plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter anticipated future development in this area. There are currently no identified mineral resources in Old own Temecula. As a result, the proposed amendments are not expected to have a significant impact on the environment. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a. ISsuesaod:S. 'ron :tnfoiri1ationSouices Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or a licable standards of other a encies? Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive round borne vibration or roundborne noise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the ro'ect vicini above levels existin without the ro'ect? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ro'ect? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? b. c. d. e. R:\OTSPIPlan ArnendmentsIPAO3-0158\1nitial Study.doc Potentially Significant ,m'act Potentially Significant Unless 'Mitigation Inco orated No 1m act Less Than Significant 1m act ../ ../ ../ ../ ../ ../ Page g Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor. modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. The Old Town area is adjacent to Interstate 15 and currently receives some noise impacts as a result. The proposed amendments could result in additional residential units in the Tourist Retail Core Planning Area, adjacent to Interstate 15, that might be impacted by freeway noise. However, current Building Code requirements sets interior noise standards that all future residential units would have to comply with. There may the potential for some construction-related noise and vibration impacts when individual development projects are undertaken in and around the area of the Specific Plan. Future construction-related impacts will be addressed when specific projects are being considered. The proposed amendments to the Specific Plan are not expected to significantly increase the previously identified level of noise exposure. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a. IssUes andSu runlnfOffnalionSourœs Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of re lacement housin elsewhere? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation InCo rated less Than Significant 1m act No 1m act ./ b. ./ c. ./ . Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. The Old Town Specific Plan has always envisioned a combination of public, commercial and residential uses. The proposed amendments do not alter that. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a. b. c. d. Issue'.'~dSu Fire rotection? Police rotection? Schools? Parks? Other ublic facilities? run Information SOurces . e. R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentslPA03-01581lnitial Study.doc Page 10 Comrnents: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor 8difications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the Isting plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. The demand and need for public services is not expected to be effected by these modifications, as a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: . ~òtentiolly PotentiallY Signifi",,"'Unl... Less Than I.."e. and SunnortinntnformOtion.Sourœ. Significant Ir:~~~t~d Significant No ImhaCt Im"aCI Imna.! a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional ./ parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or ./ expansion of recreational facilities which mighthave an adverse phvsical effect on the environment? Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. The implementation of the General Plan, the Parks and Recreation and Trails Master Plans, along with the Old Town Specific Plan will continue to address the need .... various recreation amenities in and around the Old Town area. As a result, no significant impacts are .icipated. 15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Inco rated le.. Than Significant 1m oct No 1m oct ./ a. b. ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ Page 11 c. d. R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA03-0158\lnitial Study.doc Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections. The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alte. the anticipated future development in this area. The primary change associated with circulation and parking impacts is the continuation of a previous interim policy reducing the requirement for off-street parking. The proposed amendment will permanently remove most of the off-street parking requirements for commercial uses in Old Town. This change is not proposed to affect the parking requirements for banks, bed and breakfasts, hotels, and motels in the core areas of Old Town. To meet the future parking need, the City will continue to provide centralized parking areas. T his change may result in the lack of parking c lose to the entrances of some businesses. However, the areawide benefits to the future character of Old Town will offset any adverse effects. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Polentially Potentially SlgniOcant Unless Less Than ~i!JniOcähl Mitigation Significant No Issues. and .S.þ""rtin,; In'ormation..So."",s linDact rncorriOrated tmDect Impact a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ./ applicable Regional Water QualitY Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or ./ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water ./ drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project ./ from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a detennination by the wastewater treatment ./ provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existina commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to ./ accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ./ reaulations related to solid waste? . Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor modifications. to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the existing plan or typographic corrections- The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter the anticipated future development in this area. The changes to the Specific Plan will not alter the current utility systems in this area. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated. . R:\OTSPlPlan Amendments\PA03-O15Bllnitial Study.doc Page 12 . MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: a. b. c. Issues'aMSu ,,10 'Information Sources Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California histo or rehisto ? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current ro'ects, and the effects of robable future ro'ects? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directl or indirectl ? Potentially Significant 1m act potentially SignmcantUn'ess Mitigation loco . orated No 1m act -/ Less Than Significant 1111 act ../ ../ Comments: The proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan represent a series of minor fdifications to the approved Specific Plan. The majority of the modifications represent clarifications to the sting plan or typographic corrections, The other proposed changes, if approved, will not substantially alter e anticipated future development in this area, The modifications will not noticeably alter the future development in this area as envisioned by the City General Plan and the current Old Town Specific Plan. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated from this amendment. 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached.sheets. a. b. c. 1. ~ 5, Earlier anal ses used, Identi earlier anal ses and state where the are available for review. Impacts adequately addressed, Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed b miti ation measures based on the earlier anal sis, Mitigation measures, For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated:' describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which the address site-s ecific conditions for the ro'ect. SOURCES City of Temecula General Plan. City of T emecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan for Western Riverside County, Old Town Specific Plan. R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA03-0158\1nitial Study.doc Page 13