The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About111704 PC Agenda .~. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE NOVEMBER 17, 2004 - 6:00 P.M. ........ Next in Order: Resolution No. 2004-065 CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: RollCall: Commissioner Mathewson Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item riot on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. , ' For all 'other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must ,be filed with the 'Commission Secretary Q!ÍQ! to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for indiilidlJal speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDATION: R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2004\11-17-04.doc 1.1 Approve the Agenda of November 17, 2004 2 Director's Hearina Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for October 2004 COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised' at the public hearing or In written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. New Items 3 Plannina Application No. PA03-0447 a Development Plan. submitted bv SPREI/MEI. Craia Wav. for the construction of a 10.500 SQuare foot commercial buildina. known as the Queen Ann Victorian Buildina. on 0.19 acres. located at the northeast corner of Old Town Front Street and Fourth Street. Stuart Fisk. Associate Planner. 4 Plannina Application No. PA04-0260. a Development Plan. submitted bv AGK Group LLC. for the addition of a third floor to each of the approved buildinas 12. 17.27. 35 & 38 for a total of 20 new apartment units added to the approved 220 units for a total of 240 units. located on the southeast corner of Rancho Califomia Road and Moraaa Road. Cheryl Kitzerow. Associate Planner. ' COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: December 1, 2004 Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 R:\PlANCOMMlAgendas\2004\ 11-17-()4.doc 2 () 0; ITEM #2 lJ . CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Planning Commission Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: SUBJECT: November 17, 2004 Director's Hearing Case Update Planning Director's Agenda items for October 2004 PAO4-0388 Tentative Parcel Map 31711, to subdivide a 2.89 acres lot into 3 commercial parcels with a minimum lot size of .92 acres, located at the northeast corner of Margarita Road and De Portola Road Product Review for 123 detached single- family residential homes located within Planning Area 9 of the Wolf Creek Specific Plan. Units range from 2,646 square feet to 3,274 square feet with 4 different floor plans and 3 architecturàl designs for each plan, located east of Pechanga Parkway and north of Wolf Valley Road A MCUP for the sale of used automobiles from a 1 ,375 square foot showroom situated within an existing multi-tenant commercial building, located at 28860 Old Town Front Street, Suite B1 October 21, 2004 PAO4-0508 Attachment: 1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 2 . P:IPLANNINGIDIRHEARIMEMOI2004\11-2004.doc D R Horton, Approved Continental Homes Russell Rumansoff Approved ,-_J ) P:\PLANNINGlDIRHEARIMEMOI2004\lI-2004.doc ATTACHMENT NO.1 ACTION AGENDAS . . . ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING October 14, 20041:30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1 Project Information: Project Number: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: PAO4-0074 TPM 31711 Gallatin Dental Group A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide a 2.89 acre lot into 31015 with a minimum lot size of .92 acres. Northeast corner of Margarita Road & De Portola Road. Exempt Dan Long APPROVED Location: Environmental Action: Project Planner: ACTION: P:\PLANNING\DIRHEARlAgendasl2004\lO-14--04 Action Agenda.doc 1 ACTION AGENDA . TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING October 21,2004 1 :30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1 Project Information: Project Number: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: Location: Environmental Action: PA04-0508 Southern California Car Company Russell Rumansoff A Minor Conditional Use Permit for the sale of used automobiles from a 1,375 square foot showroom situated within an existing multi-tenant commercial building. 28860 Old Town Front Street, Suite B1 Categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 15301, minor alteration of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use). Stuart Fisk APPROVED . Project Planner: ACTION: Item No.2 Project information Project Number: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: PA04-0388 Copper Moon-Wolf Creek D.R. Horton, Continental Homes Product Review for 123 detached single-family residential homes located within Planning Area 9 of the Wolf Creek Specific Plan. Units range from 2,646 square feet to 3,274 square feet with 4 different floor plans and 3 architectural designs for each plan. . P:IPLANNING\DIRHEARlAgendasl2004\10-21-04 Action Agenda.doc 1 . . . Location: Environmental Action: East of Pechanga Parkway and north of Wolf Valley Road Determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental Imact Report was previously adopted. (Section 15162 - Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declaration). Cheryl Kitzerow APPROVED Project Planner: ACTION: P:\PLANNING\DIRHEARlAgendasl2004\1()-21-04 Action Agenda.doc 2 ---', J ITEM #3 ) . . . STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: November 17, 2004 Prepared by: Stuart Fisk Title: Associate Planner File Number: PA03-0447 Application Type: Development Plan Project Description: A Development Plan to construct a 10,550 square foot commercial building on 0.19 acres located at the northeast corner of Old Town Front Street and Fourth Street, known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 922-033-010 and 922-033-011. Recommendation: (Check One) ~ Approve with Conditions 0 Deny 0 Continue for Redesign 0 Continue to: 0 Recommend Approval with Conditions 0 Recommend Denial CECA: (Check One) ~ Categorically Exempt (Class) 15332 (In-Fill) 15162 (Section) 0 Notice of Determination 0 Negative Declaration 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Applicant: Craig Way for SPREI/MEI August 14, 2003 Completion Date: Mandatory Action Deadline Date: November 17, 2004 General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Queen Ann VictorianlST AFF REPORT.doc Zoning Designation: Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5; Tourist Retail Core) . Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Retail Retail Retail Retail Lot Area: 0.19 acres Building Area/Coverage: 82.3% Landscape Area/Coverage: Parking Required/Provided: 5.8% 0 spaces required/O spaces provided BACKGROUND SUMMARY ~1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ~2. The attached "Project Review Worksheet" has been completed and staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, city-wide Design Guidelines, the Old Town Specific Plan, and the Development Code. . ANALYSIS On April 12, 2004 the Old Town Local Review Board reviewed the proposed project and made similar findings of consistency and made a recommendation for approval of the project. Site Plan The proposed two-story building will be located at the northeast corner of Old Town Front Street and Fourth Street. The Old Town Front Street and Fourth Street elevations of the building will include a covered boardwalk abutting the front and side property lines. An alley is located on the north side of the property. Services to the building, such as trash service, utility meters and delivery access, will be provided from the existing alley. The rear of the building is adjacent to an existing commercial building. A 3 foot-4 inch setback is provided between the building and the rear property line. The building setbacks meet the minimum requirements of the Specific Plan and the proposed 82.3% lot coverage is well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 100%. On-site parking is not required for the project and is not provided. The project has been conditioned to record a parcel merger prior to issuance of a building permit in order to avoid placing a building over lot lines. . R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Qneen Ann VictorianlSTAFF REPORT.doc . . . Architecture The project conforms to all the architectural development regulations of the Old Town Specific Plan. The architectural style for the proposed building is the Queen Anne Victorian style. The proposed building will incorporate various architectural features from the Queen Anne Victorian style. These features include generous porch and balcony areas, a variety of wood framed windows with decorative trim in various sizes and shapes, wood doors, wall brackets and corbels, bay windows with copper roof elements, and a wide range of wood trim, synthetic trim, and accent details establishing the design as a Queen Anne. The use of authentic building materials and high quality replications of authentic materials meet the intent of the Specific Plan architectural guidelines and help to ensure the longevity of the building through reduced maintenance requirements. The project has been conditioned to submit and receive approval for a detailed sign program prior to issuance of a building permit (see condition no. 19). Landscapina The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. Plant materials include Red Crepe Myrtle, London Plane Tree and Purple Leaf Plum trees and Fortnight Iris, Daylily, Wheeler's Dwarf Tobira and Red Groundcover Rose shrubs. Plant materials and placement carry out the Queen Anne theme, soften the development and unify the area as a pleasant environment. Existing trees and shrubs along Old Town Front Street will be protected during construction and will remain in place or be removed and replaced on site. The project proposes to landscape 484 square feet or 5.8 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum requirement of zero percent in the TRC (Tourist Retail Core) land use district of the Old Town Specific Plan. The Old Town Specific Plan recommends a minimum of one 15-gallon size tree for every 800 square feet of landscaping and one shrub or vine for every 50 feet of landscaping provided. The project exceeds the recommendation for both trees and shrubs. Access and Circulation The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved City General Plan EIR. The Fire Department also reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION [8] 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class, 15332, In-Fill Development Project) CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDA TION Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan, Old Town Specific Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval. R:\C U Pl2003\O3-0447 Queen Ann VictoriJm\STAFF REPORT.doc FINDINGS . Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) land use district of the Old Town Specific Plan. A commercial building and uses are typical land uses found in the Community Commercial land use designation within the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed commercial use is compatible with the surrounding commercial buildings currently located adjacent to the proposed site. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The architecture proposed for the building meets the architectural requirements as stated in the Architectural Style Guidelines of the Old Town Specific Plan. The proposed building architecture and building materials have been found to be compatible with the adjacent buildings. The varying building materials, shapes and offsets of the proposed building serve to break up the massing of the building. The proposed architecture complements and enhances the visual character along Old Town Front Street. . The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Project Review Sheet - Blue Page 5 2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 6 3. PC Resolution No. 2004-- - Blue Page 7 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval . R:IC U 1'\2003\03-0447 Queen Ann VictorianlSTAFF REPORT. doc ) ,-_/ ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET R:IC U 1'12003\03-0447 Queen Ann VictorianISTAFFREPORT.doc . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial PA03-0447 Planning Application Number: 1. General Plan Designation: Community Commercial Consistent? yes SP-5 Consistent? 2. Zoning Designation: yes 3. Environmental Documents Referred to in Making Determination: 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D 0 General Plan EIR Sensitive Biological Habitat Map Sensitive Archeological Area Map Sensitive Paleontological Area Map Fault Hazard Zone Map Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazard Map 100 Year Flood Map Future Roadway Noise Contour Map Other (Specify) Previous EIRlN.D. (Specify Project Name & Approval Date): Submitted Technical Studies (Specify Name, Author & Date): Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, THE. Soils Co., Inc., August 12, 2002 Other: 4. Environmental Determination: ~ Exempt 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration 0 Negative Declaration 0 EIR ~ 10 Day Review 0 20 Day Review 0 30 Day Review 5. General Plan Goals Consistency: Consistent ~ ~ ~ Inconsistent 0 D 0 Land Use Circulation Housing R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Queen Ann VictorianIPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 1 Consistent ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Inconsistent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . OS/Conservation Growth ManagemenVPublic Facilities Public Safety Noise Air Quality Community Design Economic Development 6. City-wide Design Guideline Consistency: ~ ~ Site Plannina: A. How does the placement of building(s) consider the surrounding area character? The proposed building placement is consistent with surrounding deveopment and is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan. B. How do the structures interface with adjoining properties to avoid creating nuisances and hazards? . The proposed project maintains an existing alley and provides for access from Old Town Front Street and Fourth Street. A landscaped area with no public access is located at the rear of the site and provides a buffer between the proposed building and an existing commercial building located along the project's eastern boundary. C. How does the building placement allow buildings rather than parking lots To define the street edge? As allowed by the Old Town Specific Plan, the front setback is 0 feet. As permitted by the Old Town Specific Plan, parking is not required for the project. Parkina and Circulation: A. How does the parking lot design allow customers and deliveries to reach the site, circulate through the parking lot, and exit the site easily? Parking is not provided as permitted by the Old Town Specific Plan. . R:\C U Pl2003\O3-0447 Queen Ann Victorian\PROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 2 . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial B. How does the parking lot design provide safe and convenient access to pedestrians and bicyclists? Parking is not provided as permitted by the Old Town Specific Plan. C. How are the service facilities within the parking lot screened or buffered from public view? Parking is not provided as permitted by the Old Town Specific Plan. ~ Buildina Architecture: A. How does the building design provide articulation of the building mass? The building design includes a variety of roofJines, porches and balconies, siding materials and window sizes to provide articulation of the building mass. B. How is each building "stylistically" consistent with all buildings in a complex, and on all elevations to achieve design harmony and continuity within itself? The proposed project is not within a complex. All elevations of the proposed building are consistent to achieve design harmony and continuity within itself. C. How does the placement of buildings create a more functional or useful open space between the buildings and/or the street? As allowed by the Old Town Specific Plan, the building has a foot setbacks for both the front and side. This allows for greater building area and is consistent with the goals of the Specific Plan. The design also lends to the 'Old Town" ambiance and creates a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere. D. How do each of the architectural elements (building base, windows, doors and openings, cornice and parapet, roofline, and finish materials meet the intent of the design guidelines? The architectural elements of the proposed building include various Queen Anne elements. A stone base, wood doors and windows with decorative wood trim, wall brackets and corbels, copper roof elements and a wide range of wood and synthetic trim and accent detials establish the design as a Queen Anne. The use of authentic building materials and high quality replications of authentic materials meet the intent of the design guidelines and help to ensure the longevity of the building through reduced maintenance requirments. R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Queen Ann VictorianIPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 3 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial . ~ Landscapina: A. Does the plan provide the following ratio of plantings? ~ Yes D No, why? Trees 10% 36" Box 30% 24" Box 60% 15 Gallon Groundcover 100% Coverage In One Year Shrubs 100% 5 Gallon B. Does the landscaped area, ratio, spacing, and size conform with the design guidelines? ~ Yes D No C. How does the internal site landscaping frame the building(s) and separate them from the surrounding pavements? The Old Town Specific Plan goals related to landscaping are different than those for other areas within the City. Per the Specific Plan, informal landscape forms should be utilized on major thoroughfares to emphasize the "unplanned" appearance of a rustic early California settlement. The buidlings within Old Town should be prominent, with many architectural elements of the late 1800s/early 1900s. The proposed landscaping does meet the requirements of the Specific Plan in that the landscaping: 1) continues an Old West theme; 2) softens the development; and 3) unifies the area as a pleasant environment for residents and visitors. . D. How does the patio and street' furniture, fixtures, walls and fences integrate with of the architecture and landscaping? Decks, balconies, fixtures and railings of the proposed building will tie together many elements of the Queen Anne architectural style. Arches, corbels, wood doors, heavy columns and decorative wood brackets along with many other details come together in the proposed building to create the Queen Anne style. 7. Development Code Consistency: A. How does the plan achieve the performance standards specified in Code Section 17.08.070? Circulation: Section 17.08.070 does not apply. Parking is neither required or provided for the project. . R:IC U Pl2003\O3-0447 Queen Ann Victorian\PROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 4 . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Architectural Desian: Section 17.08.070 does not apply. The project complies with the architectural style guidelines of the Old Town Specific Plan in that the building will be the Queen Anne Style, incorporating Queen Anne style elements recommended by the Specific Plan such as bay windows, balconies, turrets, porches, brackets, and an abundance of decorative details. Site Plannina and Desian: Section 17.08.070 does not apply. The project complies with the site planning guidelines of the Old Town Specific Plan in that the proposed building provideds a covered walkway along Old Town Front Street and is not set back from the boardwalk. The pedestrian quality of this relationship is enhanced by the lack of emphasis on parking lots and parked cars. As per the intent of the site planning guidelines, no parking is provided at the project site to intesify the pedestrian activity which charaterizes this area. Compatibility: Section 17.08.070 does not apply. The project complies with the land use regulations of the Old Town Specific Plan in that in the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) land use district, retail development is permitted. Furthermore, the proposed building is consistent with the Architectural Style Guidelines of the Old Town Specific Plan. B. Does the application and submitted plans on file conform with all of the applicable minimum development standards? IZI Yes, with conditions 0 No Net Lot Area: Total Floor Area: Lot Coverage: 8,400 sq. ft. 10,550 sq. ft. 82.3% R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Queen Ann Victorian\PROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 5 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial I ~ ~ JMW ß1JJII~~ ~ .st f ~ { ~ r 1~!Ililli { ~ Ç!1[ If øJ~ A . Hillside/Slope Arch./Paleo Fault Zone Flood Noise 11111. UI Traffic Habitat Subs./Liqfctn Stream/Creek Air Quality ~Ji!rJ!LØ~tl!iJ__!D,¡ 'I Ii1 North Retail SP-5 TRC Communi y Commercial East Retail SP-5 TRC Communi y Commercial West Retail SP-5 TRC Communi v Commercial South Retail SP-5 TRC Communi y Commercial R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Queen Ann Victorian\PROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 6 . . . ) '-~ ATTACHMENT NO.2 PLAN REDUCTIONS R:IC U I'l2OO3\03-0447 Queen Ann VictorianlSTAFF REPoRT. doc / . . ~ èS ~~ ~::J ~ca U)~ >-. \-=-- o¿ ~tl: ~ ! 00 ~ Ifill! !)¿. ::) ~Iillb~ lC' (f) 9 Ii ~~g ;;<:~ ~~ eo¿ ~ a liNt . ¡i,li!J 19I1'~hlr ~ dUd . ~ I!! . - """l1li"'_l1li'" "",'-."""" - ~I ""'"-,,...."'" ~~:.:.~ ~ ~ÎÌ'7 ti¡ £N9Ig0..~~~. .:=.."'::- ~ i! ~D= ¡¡ ~~.._- 'amHml!; <;"'M'~ II ¡ ! I'il Î.!li I hi hI ~.~i ;15. (~ßì! ~II ~M!~ ì:~~~~ III! II!II smum ¡i II 1 . ~ ~~q hHHh ~ . = «I" ' """ """" ." ~~ø i ~ø~'Ø!ØØ ~~. H~ B.~hH.n ¡;~~ UU~ ~ I I I I. ~I' IUd 3d §~IH .. II QB!Bd Hpli B ~ 81 .. ~ ¡Iblll t t Ihlll Îhr ¡r!lIhm II!!! mm 1111111 ¡ lit ~t I I! I ¡ . I ~. iii II! II~ þ I jl ¡Ii! . !I! d 1M I ~ I~ ill !ß !I I ¡I nIl ii/ II II!II II I ij¡ll! ! ~ II i II II! ¡Iii! Iii Ii ¡III II ~I I !~ illl.III~1 ~ Ii III :111, ! ~il Iii 1IIIill!llill¡illlll ~II; !:I ! ~I jll ~n II ~U ~d I ~ ~n! i! ~h ~ ~; ~Ih. . . . m~ I~ ~ H~g - Ii ~~~2 P' U~I ~I ~ }9g~ J~ ~ n < ~ - i . Iii .. <> ::¡ ~ ~ ::g ~ 5 0 ,. ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~~~¡¡ ...!!.~ I: I ~I- I I - --_. fRDJECTNAME: SHEET NAME, PREPAAE!> BY: ENZIO DESIGNS """""sr._,."", 18.1"1""""-1"1"'" I~ 10 .~ ~-~'"" ~~ """""'-.~. ..gullS' iUl~ ~ : III~ ~d !;Iï hn . . 1Þ """'1f«I""IOHLIIf«I"B1 iIiI"""""'J$_tlRI SN9I530 OIZN3 'AIIQ3>IVd3>ld '3WVN.I33m .fo'~ ..,'-..~ ~..=...~ """""",,,,-~~ ......."""""= -.........-.-. '3WVN.1:>3ro<ld . ~ zj :5 '-- '" 0 g t § g U ~ :x :;¡ ~ -, t;;N :f I wI g aï<c - ! 1- i¡¡u; 'i~ j~U hi ~~U 0 . . .~~i! 111 ¡ I I . ~" I 'I: hi! 15.1 """,/IO1'/~...""",,, """0'1."""00"'" .~.-..~ ~~'i ..",~..."" ;¡ "I') z iq:¡ I ~ à 3i-c GN91ga OIZNJ '.\OŒWm,¡ '"""'" ill"; """'" =ro>Id . ! 1- 5 ~ .,B ~~ ~~H ~.. ~~~~ ,~Ib~! ; Ii ~~H ~ . R .~i!i! z 0 ~ > tU tU~ :t:~ 2i ~ i a ~ ~ ~ I!I I I. I i t i !. I J , ¡ I. I ¡ i . ¡. ~! ~I """'1aI"'_9fa111"B! ""'"........,,-"'" SN9IS30 OI2N3 'AØQ3<lVd3>Id .""'.""""""""""" """""""" """" ~~\'j¡ , """"'"""'""'~ '3WYN.L33HS '3WVNJ.O3.tO<ld . i ~ UW~ - ~ I! i : i i , " ,; , , '! ,I . , , , , -, , HH . z 0 - m~ r 1 , , I , : B::. ¡ I I¡ ¡ hi : I!~ ~I !:I,I: ii! ,~~ i ~I I, ill ~~ . i',i' ì JW - ~> ! u I ~i i~H "h.~k '~~i~U 'il g~n ~.~.~àà E I ! I .~~¡ In ~b:! ð F II « j!1 Iii z III ! ¡ ¡ , . , ~ ¡ , j ¡ ¡ ì i i ¡ j ì j . \.,~3 ~l£ ¡'=1O' 0 ~ -""!fu""- .. .:=. :: - GRADING PLAN LOTI; 1 ANO 2 IN-SLOCK 21 ON 1HE MAP OF 1HE TOWN OF TEMECULA IN 1HE CITY OF TELtECULA. RJ\lERSIOE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA IN SECTION 12. r.BS.. R.3W.. PRo.Æ:CTED A.P.N. 922-033-010&011 ---1' -- i ¡ 1'5 ¡ ~ It :(1003) ---_J c53':22ò """"""........~-"'.. i:'i51r1o::""------- : $=ï!i==:'---u.----. :""!:=\:'I;'===-,,:,.::.,':.r=.:::. --1Jl}.=- :-.:..:::---.. : ::::':7£-=".:w=.":::"f.ii!S¡¡"t"iFÄ :"':"":"'.-'--""'- "";=:'-:'=-"':':"-..1"'-='01==--'1.. :.:t=='.!'01!"_":.~':'=':;,,-=- : :-..=.:=.::.-==::=;;,=.:..",: ::=..:::.-:.:..-..-.- ~':\':I===:::...,=,~-- 5:."::"'h-~-:.:-s¡.:=:=::. . -------------::::. :':-'---'--'---.'- -- .----.-------- .-. iF_-~';l.-:::?g;g;'~=w . ..-- i¡:"'l-='S'n=-...:=mü."i:F -L :.::::~..::::~:.:~. - ~~;,rš.'It-:=.:.~~ ,~ I ~~~~PR:~:~_. l~kLJ '1 ..--.-.--.-----. ------- .......... iiL. ~...¡:a, Iii!Iæ œ. i:= ~., =~""3=-==-=":'-:-"" ¡¡:¡.~æ;,-~a. (1004) I ¡::..::¡ æ"l:-~l:ii&.'i'.5"~~i¡::.~æ:F~="===-.r:I:r:;¡' ,:t . :':'=-==--:=-':=:::""'1:" , iI'5oI'IIo~"=--'---' (1~) : .æ-~:¡::::::.--='- =æ:i.-:::~';¡:';~;':.!:::.::.r. I LEGENO =-_-::r.:':'::¡"='::~:===":.. : 5.r~ ::=::..:.._=:::::..:~ (14'03) l1li'='" :':'..::..-;.:.'-.----.- . _.~_.- -.-. &&L- ..-"""""'-.-.---. Z ..,.--....., æ:a::= ~ ==:r.:l.:l.'Ji11T,=.==- ~I : =::..~- ~ :':-=-":'~:=::"::::"-I ¡¿ ,~ .-. ~ ~":._:k:-::';=--' .1 ';;c¡ --~ h ~:;:~-- . "",'y ,~ ;::i;:r.,-~! . . ". 51 '. . ." ./1 (1òõ2'J 1t_"¡Lþ J"'It- -~~_--:<~~?\ ~~-~?~~r::,:f~~:~~~ = -- i~ ~~ N45~O'0I'W : ..... - ----- i¡ ,"""""""""---- !'I ! Ii- - ----- --~--'-------r..::"'.=r---' - - :: ::" ~ :::..~ ;~.¿:;-.æ:.:~ -~- ~ ,;,~-= --- ---- _@::Œ""'T .1 FRCiN--r----::- - - ~W ~22=113~' --..--- I -- """'- ""'" ----- "'C\\,,-'--'-- =-=-iiF..a:==::-.. æ=m=-'TF-,;,s::' CItY OF 'ÆMECULA ..- ...,,!j.<¡,¡J,\i.~~g¡~V~... '.......... """'",..", -- =~.........r.- -"'"---""'- ----"""'- . . . ---¡=.~,:¡,:--<o 0 .~....._----_.._"'-~ ~~~ 11 a """"N'" S3W>0VJ ."","",.. ...œ~---. Y T: d:: ",rfl:\%';~ I 9W3d9 ....., ~1~ ~""!~a .r1OIIO W8'MflV ~'...... "JV.l3! NMQJ, cno """""" .¡¡! i '" õ ~ I i."!"'! I m ~!!! ! I I! i J II ¡¡I! ! . I i!u ¡iI !iI:lq¡ 81':°11'1' !iI~:I: : az ~~ ~II.. 01 Z. tfi\~' ¡ ~i ~r, 111..1 - ~! .,d ;;;;¡ ;::¡;. :J' Wi lEI . I , I I I I , ¡ . i i I I . I I I i I . I I i I , I I ¡ I I . ¡ ¡ i I I I i . i I I i I , . II i ~, ¡ ~ i ,;.,;. ~ ill I : HI 1m , m m; ! I .. I; § .1 ii I' :1 ) . I ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- , R:\C U 1'\2003103-0447 Qncen Ann VictorianISTAFPREPORT.doc . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0447, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 10,550 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON 0.19 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND FOURTH STREET, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 922-033-010 AND 922-033-011. WHEREAS, Craig Way, representing SPREI/MEI, filed Planning Application No. PA03- 0447 (Development Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA03-0447 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA03-0447 on November 17, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA03-0447 subject to conditions of approval and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinas The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA04-0447, hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) land use district of the Old Town Specific Plan. A commercial building and uses are typical land uses found in the Community Commercial land use designation within the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed building be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed commercial use is compatible with the surrounding commercial buildings currently located adjacent to the proposed site. R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Qneen Ann Victorian\D!11ft Resolution & COA.doc I B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. . The architecture proposed for the building meets the architectural requirements as stated in the Site Development Standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. The proposed building architecture and building materials have been found to be compatible with the adjacent buildings. The varying building materials, shapes and offsets of the proposed building serve to break up the massing of the building. The proposed architecture complements and enhances the visual character along Old Town Front Street. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project is categorically exempt from environmental review (Class 32 - In-Fill Development) pursuant to section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 15332 applies when there are no potentially significant environmental constraints on the site; the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning regulations; the project is located on a site within the city limits, which is served by all utilities; and the project site is less than 5 acres in area. Section 4. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA03-0447 , a request to construct, establish, and operate a 10,550 square foot two-story commercial building with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. . Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of November 2004. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] . R:IC U 1'12003\03-0447 Queen Ann VictorianlDnlft Resolutioo & COA.doc 2 . . . STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of November 2004, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:IC U Pl2003\O3-0447 Qneen Ann VictorianlDraft Resolution & COA.doc 3 -ì I ) '-J EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\C U 1'12003103-0447 Queen Ann VictnrianlDrafl Resoln\Ìon & COA.doc 4 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA03-0447 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct a 10,550 square foot commercial building on 0.19 acres located at the northeast corner of Old Town Front Street and Fourth Street, known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 922-033-010 and 922- 033-011. DlF Category: MSHCP Category: Retail Commercial/Service CommerciaVOffice Commercial Assessor Parcel Nos.: 922-033-010 and 922-033-011 Approval Date: November 17, 2004 November 17, 2006 Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any 3. R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Qneen Ann VictorianlDraft Resolution & COA.doc 5 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. . The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits B (Site Plan), C (Building Elevations), D (Floor Plan), E (Roof Plan), F (Landscape Plan), and G (Color and Materials Board) contained on file with the Planning Department. . Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. Aluminum seamless rain gutters and external downspouts (A.B. Rain Gutter Inc. 5" O-g with baked enamel "classic cream" finish, or equivalent) may be used at the applicant's option. Placement of downspouts shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 11. Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. 12. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. 13. 14. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it . R,\C U 1'12003\03-0447 Queen Ann Victorian\Draft Resolution & COAdoc 6 . 15. . . deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeologicaVcultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Exhibit "P' (Color and Materials Board), contained on file with the Planning Department. Lap Siding & Trim (HardiPlank Cedarmill Finish) - Main Body Fascia & Barge Board (2" x 6" wood) Exterior Ceilings & Eaves (HardiSoffit Panel - Cedarmill Finish) Columns (Turn craft Fiber-Reinforced Polymer) Windows (Marvins Magnum Double Hung Wood) Exterior Entry Doors (AAW, Inc. Red Oak) Wood with "Golden Oak" Finish Door & Window Surrounds (Fypon High Density Polyurethane) Railings, Balusters & Newels (Fypon High Density Polyurethane) Louvered Attic Vents (Fypon High Density Polyurethane) Exterior Spandrels (wood) Stairs & Balcony Deck Coating (Environmental Coating, Inc Acrylic) Shingles - Roof Roof Cupolas (Copper) Rain Gutters & Downspouts Exterior Base (Cobblefield Stone) Concrete Boardwalk Surface (Sullivan Simulated Wood Planking) Sherwin Williams SW2829 (Classical White) Sherwin Williams SW2829 (Classical White) Sherwin Williams SW2829 (Classical White) Sherwin Williams SW2829 (Classical White) Sherwin Williams SW2829 (Classical White) Sherwin Williams SW2829 (Classical White) Sherwin Williams SW2829 (Classical White) Sherwin Williams SW2829 (Classical White) Sherwin Williams SW2829 (Classical White) Cinnamon - "Traffic Texture" Certain Teed "Presidential Shake TL" (Charcoal Blend) CopperCraft (Bright Copper) A.B. Rain Gutter, Inc. Aluminum Seamless (Classic Cream) Texas Cream (cvs-2083) Blend of Brown Tone Stains 16. The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be R:IC U Pl2oo3103-O447 Queen Ann VictorianlDI1lft Resolution & COA.doc 7 deemed satisfied by the Director of Planning's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that the Director of Planning determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the condition of approval. The Director of Planning may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. . All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 17. 18. 19. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department and Public Works Department. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Oriilinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 20. 21. 22. 23. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by the Planning Director. All signage shall comply with the approved sign program. . Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "P', or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. An agronomic soils report shall be submitted with the construction landscape plans. . b. c. d. e. f. R:IC U 1'\2003103-0447 Queen Aon VictoriaolDrnft Resolutioo & COA.doc 8 . 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. All utilities and light poles shall be shown and labeled on the landscape plans and appropriate screening shall be provided. A three-foot (3.0') clear zone shall be provided around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. The Planning Director shall approve the Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. The building construction plans shall include details for all trash enclosures for the project, which shall consist of masonry walls, a concrete floor and a concrete stress pad to reduce pavement damage from disposal trucks. The construction plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange". Prior to Release of Power 29. 30. . 31. 32. . The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, all mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the roofline or behind architecturally integrated screen walls. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment or roof equipment is visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide architecturally integrated screening subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning. Prior to release of power, all site improvements shall be installed. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS General Requirements 33. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 34. 35. Grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Queen Ann VictorianlDraft Reso1ntion & COAdoc 9 36. The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards for Old Town and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. . Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: rolled curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drain facilities and sewer and domestic water systems. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. a. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. A Geological Report. shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. . The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works e. Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau 44. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off- site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. . R,\C U P\2oo3\03-0447 Queen Ann Victorian\Dmft Resolution & COAdoc 10 . 45. 46. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 47. . 48. . Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401 and 402. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. b. c. d. 49. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Fourth Street (Local Road Standards for Old Town - 60' RIW) to include installation of half-width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 50. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 51. R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Queen Ann VictorianlDraft Resolution & COA.doc 11 52. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. . Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 53. 54. 55. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. BUILDING AND SAFETY 56. 57. 58. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. . 59. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 60. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 61. 62. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled AccesS Regulations effective April 1,1998). . R:'C U 1'\2003103-0447 Queen Ann VicwrianlDraft Resolution & COA.doc 12 . 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. . 72. 73. 74. . Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. Show all building setbacks. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays FIRE DEPARTMENT 75. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 76. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration, ONLY 850 OF WHICH IS R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Qoeen Ann VictorianlDrnft Resolution & COA.doc 13 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. REQUIRED ONSITE. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix 111-8, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) . As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants ARE NOT required. (CFC 903.2) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) . Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 83. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 84. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) . R:IC U Pl2oo3\O3-0447 Queen Ann VictorianlIkaft Resolution & COAdoc 14 . . . 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. . Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 90. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 91. 92. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) R:IC U Pl2003103-0447 Queen Ann VictorianlDraft Resolntion & COA.doc IS COMMUNITY SERVICES . General Conditions 93. 94. The trash enclosure shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. All perimeter landscaping, fencing, parkways including areas within the ROWand on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or private maintenance association. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 95. 96. Prior to building permit the developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 97. 98. 99. 100. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated August 27, 2003 from the Rancho California Water District. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated August 26, 2003 from the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. . The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated October 6, 2003 from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated August 25, 2003 from Sempra Energy. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Date Applicant's Signature Applicant's Printed Name . R:IC U 1'12003\03-0447 Queen Ann VictoriaolDraft Resolution & COAdoc 16 Bancha later Boan! orD;"""~ John E. H_"~. S,.V;.ep",.;d~. Stephen J. eonma Rolph H. Daily Ben JL """'. lJu D. H.....~ c.ahaF.K" OIT~~, Phimp L. F- I"terim Gen~I M........ Di=",ofF;u--"'~' E.P. "Bob" X-o- Di""""fE."""eri.. Kenneth C. Deely Di""",ofOpmtiou " Ma;"teun'" Peny JL Lonek eo"""U.. August 27,2003 Rick Rush, Associate Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY LOTS NO.1 AND NO.2 OF MAP BOOK 15, PAGE 726 APN 922-033-010 AND APN 922-033-011 Dear Mr. Rush: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of fmancial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Any relocations of existing District facilities will be the responsibility of the owner. :;::~:~Ad~;~;"'ati.. If rue protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees s.rn~ Ma,,- and requirements. c. MI,ha" Co_" - - a Kri....- LLP Gen~leo..,,~I Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreementthat assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Smcerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT ~.~ Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager I~ Œ @ Œ 0 ill Œ ~I I~I AUG 2 8 2003 !~JI By I 03\SB:at200IFOI2- T6IFCF Rnneho CaUfnmia Wale, Diatriet 421"'W;~h....,Roed' P",.om",Bo,9017' T~I..CaUfnnU.92689-9017' (909>296-$00' FAX (909> 296-68«J ÞA: COUTY OF RIVERSIDE . COM~k IITY HEALTH AGENCY ~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH . August 26. 2003 City of Temecula Planning Depamnent P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Rick Rush RE: Plot Plan No~ PA03-0447 Dear Mr. Rush: L The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA03-0447, to construct 11.000 sq. ft mixed use building to include a restaurant and we have no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. 2. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the following items are required: a) "WiIl-serve"letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330). (909) 955-8980 NOTE: AJly culTent additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Depamnent of Environmental Health clearance. ~Œ@ŒOWŒ[I ~1 AUG 2 8 2003 :~I By . . Local Enfo«ement Agency' Po. Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502.1280 . (909) 955.8982 . FAX (909) 781.9653 . 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Flom, Riverside, CA 92501 Land Use and Water EMineeriM . PO. Box 1206, Riverside, CA 92502.1206 . (909)955.8980 . FAX (909) 955-8903 . 4080 Lemon SITeet, 2nd Roor, rnverside, CA 92501 ~, D. WILLIAMS eneral M,.,ager-ChiefE~gi~5.er .. . oc ¡ "Zi ¿U...' ] 995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909.955.1200 909.788.9965 FAX 84762 C_RI:¥J1:RSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ~-ÃÑÏ5 WATER CONSERVATION DISTRlCT October 6, 2003 City ofTemecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: Rick Rush Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Conditional Use Pennit PA03-0447 The District does not usually review land divisions/land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters/flood hazard reports for projects that are located within incorporated Cities. Exceptions are made for cases with items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply . District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such Issues.. . P A03-044 7 is a proposal to construct an 11,000 square feet mixèd use building on a 1.93-acre site located at the northeast comer of Old Town Front Street and Fourth Street within the city of Temecula. The entire site is located within the Zone AE boundary as delineated on Panel No. 06074200lOB of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in conjunction with the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The US Army Corps of Engineers completed a Murrieta Creek Flood Control Feasibility Study on September 2000. Based oninfonnation obtained trom the feasibility.study,.tbe water surface elevation for the ultimate flow rate of 37,800 cubic feet per second is 1008010 feet (National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1929). New buildings should be floodproofed by elevating the finished floor a minimum of 12 inches above the water surface elevation for the ultimate flow rate of 37,800 cfs as detennined in the Murrieta Creek Flood Control Feasibility Study. Due to the extreme hazard posed by MUITieta Creek, the City should consider not allowing the development to proceed adjacent to the Creek until the ultimate improvements can be constructed. Property within the floodplain. should be conditioned to construct the required improvements or participate in a financing mechanism such as an assessment district to ensure necessary improvements are constructed. If the City chooses to allow development to proceed, we recommend that the City should condition the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other pertinent infonnation as needed to meet FEMA requirements. . 84762 City of Temecula Re: Conditional Use Pennit PA03-0471 -2- October 6,2003 . The project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta CreekfIemecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid for by cashier's check or money order written to Flood Control District prior to the issuance of building or grading pennits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual pennit. The following infonnation of a general nature is provided herewith for your use: This project may need to obtain an applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) pennit coverage from the State Water Resources Control Board or the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) - San Diego Region. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval . should not be given until the City has detennined that the project has been granted a pennit or is shown to be exempt. If the mapped flood plain is impacted by the project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 160111603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Pennit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the RWQCB - San Diego Region prior to issuance of the Corps 404 pennit. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Teresa Tung at 909.955.4050. Very truly yours, . ~~ STEPHEN C. THOMAS Senior Civil Engineer IT:lib:slj . . . . MThe Gas Company ) A ~ Sempra Energy utilityw File # 03-072 thru 03-077 8-25-2003 City of Temecula Planning Dept. PO Box 9033 Temecula, Ca. 92589-9033 Atfu: T.Thornsley, Rick Rush, S. Fisk Re: Projects: PA03458, PA03-0427, PA03-0429, PA03-0443, PA03-0444, PA03-0447 Planners, Thank you for Inquiring about our active under underground facilities. As you requested we are enclosing a copy of our atlas prints covering the project area as highlighted on your map. Our Main lines are by Size and Location dimensioned fÌom existing Property Lines or Center Line of Street. These are approximate locations ouly. Depths of these lines vBI)' in as much as these facilities were installed some time ago and subsequeut street improvements may have altered the grade considerably. It is the responsibility of the City, Utility, Developer, or Engineering Firm to determine if a conflict exists between the proposed development and our facilities. If a conflict is identified and can only be resolved by relocating our facilities, please be advised that the projected timetable for the completion could be six months. This includes Planning, Design, Material procurèmeuts, Construction, and Reconciliation. We will also require' Signed Finalized" Plans of Construction profiles prior 10 the start of the relocation. Upon request, at least (48) hours prior to the start of Constructiou The Southern California Gas Company will locate and mark our active underground facilities at no cost- Please have your contractor call Underground Service Alert @ (800) 422-4133. If you need anymore infonnation, please call me at (909) 335-7582 ~:~mozY Planning Associate Technical Services Depa ent By- = 'ì I ITEM #4 ) '-_/ . . . Date of Meeting: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION November 17, 2004 Title: Associate Planner Prepared by: Cheryl Kitzerow File Number Application Type: Development Plan - Major Modification PA04-0260 Project Description: Recommendation: (Check One) CECA: (Check One) A Major Modification to an approved Development Plan (PA99-0317- Temecula Ridge Apartments) for the addition of a third floor to buildings 12, 17,27,35 & 38 (Building Type One) for a total of 20 new apartment units added to the approved 220 units for a total of 240 units. Minor site plan modifications are also proposed to accommodate 10 new parking spaces. The project site is approximately 21-acres located at the southeast corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road, known as Assessor's Parcel No. 944-290-011. 0 Approve with Conditions [8] Deny (No conditions attached) 0 Continue for Redesign 0 Continue to: 0 Recommend Approval with Conditions 0 Recommend Denial [8] Notice of Determination Section 15162 0 Negative Declaration 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan OEIR R:ID Pl2004\04-0260 Temecnla Ridge ApartmentsIPC STAFF REPORT.doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY . Completion Date: AGK Group, LLC October 22, 2004 Applicant: Mandatory Action Deadline Date: November 17, 2004 General Plan Designation: "M" Medium Density Residential (7 - 12 dwelling units per acre) Zoning Designation: "M" Medium Density Residential Site/Surrounding Land Use: "M" Medium Density Residential, vacant, graded and apartment building foundations under construction Site: East: "H" High Density ResidentiaV Woodcreek and Portofino Apartments "H" High Density and "LM" Low Medium Density ResidentiaV Mira Loma and Rancho Apartments, and single family dwellings on Levande Place "PO" Professional OfficeNacant-grading for approved Temecula Village commercial and multi-family residential project "PO" Professional Office and "H" High Density Residential/ Vacant & Summer Breeze Apartments; Rancho California Medical Plaza beyond . North: South: West: Lot Area: 20.88 acres Building Summary: Building Type One: 2-story, 3 buildings total 12, one bed/one bath units, 780SF 12, 2 bed/one bath units, 1,017/1,001 SF 12, 2 bed/2 bath units, 1,106 SF Building Type One Modified: Proposed 3-story, 5 buildings total 20, one bed/one bath units, 780 SF 20, 2 bed/one bath units, 1,017/1,001 SF 40, 2 bed/2 bath units, 1,106 SF (20 of these are additional proposed units) Building Type Two: 3-story, 8 buildings total 48, one bed/one bath units, 790 SF 24, 2 bed/2 bath units, 1,022 SF 24, 2 bed/2 bath units, 1,014 SF Building Type Three: one and two-story, 7 buildings total 28,3 bed/2.5 baths, 1,277 SF 28, 3 bed/2.5 baths, 1,305 SF . R:ID P\2OO4\04-O26O Temecula Ridge ApartmeutsIPC STAFF REPORT-doc 2 . . . Building Height: Building Type Four - Clubhouse and Workout Room Building Type Five - 1-story, 1O-car garage, 13 buildings total Building Type Six - 1-story, 3-car garage, 2 buildings total Maximum: 40 feet, Proposed 37 feet Total Lot Coverage: Maximum: 35 percent, Proposed 19.7 percent Landscape Area/Coverage: 393,172 SF /43 percent Parking Required/Provided: Uncovered: 226 required/218 proposed; Covered: 268 required/280 proposed. Total Required: 494; Total Proposed: 498 BACKGROUND SUMMARY ~1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, however, staff feels the project does not substantially conform to the approved project and is inconsistent with the Growth Management Program Action Plan and Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. Planning Application No. PA99-0317 was received on August 11, 1999, as a request to construct a 266-unit apartment project. The project was reviewed by staff and modified to include 246 units. The Planning Commission approved the project on August 18, 2000. This decision was appealed, and on October 10, 2000 the City Council heard PA99-0317 (Appeal of the Temecula Ridge Development Plan). After hearing testimony, both in support and opposition, the City Council denied PA99-0317 and directed the City Attorney to bring back Findings for Denial to the City Council meeting on October 24, 2000. At the October 24, 2000 meeting, the Council again heard additional testimony and recommended that the item be continued to allow the Council time to meet with the developer to discuss a redesign of the project. The project was redesigned as follows: . . A reduction in the number of units from 246 units to 220 units; Removal of the third floor from Type 1 buildings; . Reduction in the size of the recreation center to accommodate the tot lot at this location; Lowering the elevation of the site by 5 feet at the back to reduce potential view impacts. The Council ultimately approved the redesigned project on December 12, 2000. On April 13, 2004, the subject project, Planning Application No. PA04-0260, a Major Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA99-0317) was submitted. A DRC meeting was held on June 10, 2004 and staff informed the applicant that staff's recommendation would be denial based on the findings made for the previously approved project, and inconsistency with the General Plan Land Use Element and Growth Management Program Action Plan in terms of determining allowable density. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The approved Temecula Ridge Apartments consists of 22 separate buildings with four different models, ranging in size from 780 square feet to 1,305 square feet. Three of the building types R:\D Pl2004\04-0260 Temecula Ridge ApartmentsIPC STAFF REPORT.doc 3 offer ground-level, fully enclosed garages, with the dwelling units either in a single level or multi- level floor plan (two-story unit). Eight of the buildings are approved as three-story units (Building Type 2). Additionally, there are separate, single or double garage structures. No carports are proposed within the project. Guest parking spaces are provided throughout the site. A portion of both the garages and guest spaces are handicapped accessible. The subject application is a proposal by AGK Group to modify Building Type One to include a third story, in order to accommodate the construction of 20 additional units. The additional units are proposed for Buildings 12 (perpendicular to southern property line), 17 (parallel to internal drive, 27 (perpendicular to Rancho California Road), 35 (parallel to Rancho California Road) and 38 (parallel to the eastern entry drive). In addition, minor site modifications are proposed to accommodate the additional parking spaces required for the additional units. Neither building location, grading, access or amenity changes are proposed. ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the application to add 20 units and increase the height of five buildings. Staff has determined that the proposed modifications do not substantially conform with the density and scale of development intended for this site. The project is not consistent with the Growth Management Program Action Plan density and amenity requirements, and the applicant has not provided for Multi-Use Trail Segment 17, an 8-foot trail identified in the Trails and Bikewàys Master Plan to be located along the westerly and southerly portion of the project site. Consistencv with the Growth Manaaement Proaram Action Plan Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the Growth Management Program Action Plan adopted by the City Council on March 21, 2000. The Action Plan directs the Planning Commission to consider approving residential projects at the lowest allowable density in eàch density category. However, the Plan states that the Commission may consider approving a project above the lowest density if the project provides on site or community amenities. The General Plan density range designated for the project site is 7-12 dwelling units per acre, the approved project density is 10.54 dwelling units per acre, and the proposed project density is 11.5 dwelling units per acre. The amenities provided on site include enclosed garages for all units (no carports), recreation room, workout room, tot lot, junior olympic size pool for community use and spa. In addition, the approved project provides benefits to the community by constructing traffic circulation improvements in the vicinity in conjunction with development. By providing multiple family housing, the project satisfies the need for equal housing opportunities for all existing and future residents of Temecula and assists the City in meeting its General Plan Housing Element requirements. These amenities were determined by the City Council in 2000 to support a project density of 10.54 dwelling units. The proposal for 20 additional units, which increases the density to 11.5 dwelling units per acre, does not include any additional amenities. Therefore, staff feels the additional density is not justified and would not be consistent with the Growth Management Program Action Plan requirements for additional amenities. Multi-Use Trails and Bikewavs Master Plan Based on the Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan adopted in 2002, the Temecula Community Services Department has requested the applicant to construct an 8-foot multi-use trail along the westerly and southerly portions of the project site as identified in the Master Plan. This area is currently owned by the project applicant, with a portion of the trail located within an R:\D 1'\2004\04-0260 Temecula Ridge Aparunen\sIPC STAFF REPORT.doc 4 . . . . . . easement owned by Southern California Edison where existing overhead utility lines are located. The applicant has expressed concern with the proposed trail location based on security issues for future residents, and has not addressed this requirement on the site plan. In addition, the applicant has explained that adjacent property owners and Southern California Edison may be opposed to the proposed trail location; however to date staff has not received correspondence on this issue. Staff maintains that the trail is required per the Master Plan and therefore the site plan should accommodate this trail segment. Scale of Development The proposed architecture modifications are the same as those proposed with the original project in 2000 for three-story units. The colors and materials are consistent with those previously approved. Building orientation provides visual interest and variety. Building setbacks were varied along the perimeter of the project, and the meandering spine drive also varies the streetscape within the project. Building designs have varied heights and rooflines, strong vertical and horizontal articulation, and varied and broken facades. The third story element conforms to the approved 2-story design, however staff feels the addition of five, three-story buildings would result in too large a scale of development on the subject site (which is elevated above Rancho California Road). Furthermore, staff is concerned with the impact on existing views from the adjacent single family residences to the south, and feels the additional building height will result in an adverse aesthetic impact. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ~1. The project will have no significant environmental impacts and has been found to be consistent with a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (adopted December 12, 2000). If the proposed project is approved, an addendum with an updated "Traffic and Circulation" section would be prepared, pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act. An updated Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed 20 units was submitted, reviewed and accepted by the City's Traffic Engineer. The document concluded that the net impact percentage for the additional 20 units is less than one percent (0.65%), and therefore no additional off-site improvements would be required, only the payment of standard development impact fees. All previous mitigation for the approved 220 unit project would remain unchanged. CONCLUSIONIRECOMM ENDA TION Staff has determined that the project is not consistent with the Growth Management Program Action Plan and General Plan Community Design Policies. Based on the following findings, staff is recommending denial of the additional 20 units. Should the Planning Commission support the proposed project, staff recommends this item be continued to allow for the preparation of findings and conditions of approval. FINDINGS Development Plan (17.05.010F) R:ID Pl2004\04-0260 Temecula Ridge ApartmentsIPC STAFF REPORT.doc 5 1. 2. The proposed Project is not in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and specifically with the density requirements of the Land Use Element of the General Plan based on the following: a. The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the Project Site as "Medium Density" which allows a range of seven to 12 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Project density is 11.5 dwelling units per acre, which is within the specified range. However: On March 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Growth Management Program Action Plan as authorized by Section I/.B. of the Growth Management Public Facilities Element of the Temecula General Plan. Section 2.8.1 of the Growth Management Program Action Plan provides: "Direct the Planning Commission to consider approving residential projects at the lowest allowable density in each density category. The Commission may consider approving a project above the lowest density if the project provides onsite or community amenities." b. c. Based upon the factors set forth in the Land Use Element of the General Plan and the Growth Management Program Action Plan for determining the allowable density for a site, the following factors have been considered by the Commission as justification for denial: i. The Project proposes to add a third-story element to five Type 1 buildings which would create an increase in height and bulk of the project design and negatively affect aesthetics from Rancho California Road and adjacent single family residences. Staff believes the additional building height will result in an adverse aesthetic impact on existing views from the adjacent single family residences to the south. ii. The Project proposes to increase the number of units from 220 (10.5 du/acre) to 240 (11.5 du/acre) and no additional onsite or community amenities are proposed. The Project does not have amenities sufficient to support the density being proposed. The amenities provided on-site were required in order to achieve the approved density. iii. The Multi-Use Trails and Bikes Master Plan identifies Segment 17 to run along the westerly and southerly boundary of the proposed project and this trail has not been provided for the in the project design. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project would have an adverse impact on the general welfare because approving the additional units without any additional amenities would result in an undesirable precedent of approving project that do not provide sufficient amenities required per the Growth Management Program Action Plan. In addition, the additional building height is incompatible with the adjacent single family residences to the south and neighborhood compatibility should be maintained in order to protect the health, safety and general welfare. RID \'\2004\04-0260 Temec,,1a Ridge AparonentsIPC STAFF REPORT.doc 6 . . . . . . ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 8 2. PC Resolution No. 2004-- - Blue Page 9 R:ID Pl2004\04-0260 Temecnla Ridge ApartmentsIPC STAFF REPORT.doc 7 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ) PLAN REDUCTIONS R:\D Pl2004\04-Q260 Temecu1a IUdS. Apartments\PC STAFF REPORT.doc 8 TEMECULA RID-GE AP AR TMENTS~~'JOd4 - ~CT ~ 2. 2004 !Rancho California !Road at Moraga Road 'femecula, California OWNER "'G"",,"" ~=~'~... ARCH"ECT LANDSCAPE ARCHIIECT CIVIL ENGINEERING ~~,'~\z¡: ",""""""'AAC~"""'" _,c--œ"'~"',," """"""'""",,C^- ~~!:i-\m ..-_~ """""""",""""^"""". """"",..."""",.. ..,-_C,"',~ m"'n""" """"""""'" G""""""..eM'" "'-""'-.,~...'^ _co."." m""n""" """",no,.... "-'" "".""'N,,"""""" """'NO. "". ".",..,,'O_^~..... """",_co."'" m'""",-".. ,""",""'..., MECHANiCAl ENGINEE"NG lLiCTRlCAL ENGINEE"NG PLUMBING ENGINEERING DRV""UTIES 'if: "'"",""'"'-""',"""""""'" ""'~""'"...,..oo -_.co.""" "ò,... OA" -_._~~----- -~-.-~- . ==-=====..- TEMECULA RIDGE APARTMENTS .. ~._~,..._..~--- ~,~-~,~ :=-..::::==--:::-.=-- -. .-----.-..---. --- -'- -'-- _.~,. .-- . , - .-- ~~ iii -- -... 2IIII'r IIIiII"'". -. -,-,,-..--. .-.-.------. -----.---- -. -.-- -.- --- ._.~,. -. , . . -. ~ ~! r3 ~ t~ !I ~~H hI ",,~ ! ::i ì§ ]0 ß~:H1 ~~ ð" ~ j III Z 0 N . ~ . . . ~n . ~n +--- . 'II!! i i: I" 1 ! III¡¡ ¡ ¡¡ i " II !II II i II (j '" ';, !!! ~! II! IIIPI ~ ~!~ . ¡ ddi' ¡ II ~ !I ii' !I II ¡ IS~ h ~ Ii illi II II III IIII ~ ~~ ~~ I b j I 'Æ" ~ ~ ~ ~. i U~ !~b Ii -iL I II , ~i¡ "'Ð;:::¡¡ ~I' IiI ~!i¡ ,"!! ! ! ¡ ! ! III¡¡ ¡ U fl ¡i¡ II 0 II ill!1 ¡ ~~ r- æ I I! I!I!Pi j¡i¡d I G! !I' ! . i II iili Ii !i!n a~ j1 IIII ~ ~~ j~ ~ ~ a ¡i~i 1 II il¡¡ -. - , ili¡ rn ~n - ili¡ . . '$--- . '$-n "I~¡ 1 ¡ ¡ II!Ii ¡ ¡'!'I a II !II ¡II ¡ ~ ¡¡¡HnUI! ~, "I,!I!I!, ~ ¡PI, ¡IIIII! Ii 1iI!.I'¡. IIII ~ "' ~ \.:)U) ~ ~Z H ..:"' ~~ ,..J~ ~1 8~ r¡ "' 0.. ~~ ::;;..: u "' ~ f-< œ <$1---------- . ~ í j ~8j I~ 'Ii i~~i bli 'I ~¡" ~!II .... ¡Ii: ..... ,.¡! ! 8'" ~ a! t"1Z ~~ ~! "',.¡' I :S~ " ~~ it ;:;;'" ð~ ~< j ...........---- ¡i~1 ~dl .ðE. - ': --------- _l__- f--~ T ...:-= l,!J I I !I It ':;'; ~~I ,!.! 1!11i . .! II iii n. -----t- ~..:-.:= Hi i¡'ij; Ii:!i ; hl!1 I_- I ...:-.:= Hi an;; j,..¡ lï~ij 1i!!1 ~J i . ~ ~ i . . ~I ~! ~gágá!' ¡¡¡¡/" iUUU I ~ ~ Î t3 ~ i 8 Ii j~ i! 0<: '" - § I j~ j~ ~~ Ii ~ ] z 0 ~ !ž ~ ! ~ i '='" :8 8 8 8 ~ i i J J" r~'!ll II II ~ !! ~II~ i i i i i i i ¡ i il i ii ii i Ii Ii i I~i I~i ~ I~~ I~~ i~ If .i~ III M ~ ",] I C) '" t ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~: ~~ i~ U~ il "'~ ¡j~ a¡ ~ f-< ~ - " " Iii Iii I~~ I~~ I~:; I ~ ~nl i lëii' !55 Iii . . II " ~ ~ ~ ~ ï -~ ] I ~ II. Q, ~~!~ ¡I ~~ ]~ u~ ~I ;¡j'" ð~ ¡:J< i ~~ . ¡i ~ ~ ~ ~ â i¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 111 .~~~ ~-._81 I VlNlfO~I1V:> 'vln:>3V'131 SLN3m!JVdV 3ÐOI!J Vln::>3V31 Ii ìÏ! 111¡lllllllllll1WlI\ 3,~ . ~~:I !' ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ . i ¡' . -=. ITTTr-," f~ ~ ~~î}~ ~. ._~ \ \ ~ ~- I ~d- ~ - - \ ' - Iíìl i (id:: I"- II r TT1!i i \,¡ tl' y~. ~ ~ ~ \ I~ p- !I) ...jj¡¡¡.. 11 I ~\ -- J uJ,¡¡.,\" ~ jj-n'¡¡¡ '¡ - '~~ml - \ . I ,"'\ l-L--- ~~~ . ,.'111 I iii., r~¡~ \ t- ::- --- l:¡, .' -"""-w !'I~" u~ - ' 3 \ :d MoIT /' \ ' .::f"F;"v '? ~ r- \- \¡'-:...., II/IUIII---'_- \ \--- \r:. ê ~ "'-'.' -. - ì '- \ L.--- C--- ~'I I - .','~H~,- \1 \ ';:: / n I ' 1= '~I- ~-~-- ' l .- -- ;. ~, I :ðf€ t: ' I rrÏID ~ \ -- ~ \\ ',. ~~ I '- ~ \- ". . rJ.5 t;;:j II rT, ,\..-- . -- I -,- - ~~ ~. :-L' '.~~ ~" I t ~-~ r ':9 -. . ""'" -I" . -\I.-~, ' -;:.!í I I I .~¡..--- Irr'-'!J'~- . .I-Ir-, "'-_. '~!iL_~:"'" % liT ~- . . I \'--' .níì~~ '.'~ ""'-J -'f../~.~¡ I' - _J"~ -- -m . " -------~ - ,-- , , " ,\..--L-- 1 --, ~); ~ ~ ) I. i1!rr- . ! ~~ "'1- ~: '. ö"'" :im ;'!:--rÞ): -- ---- ------ E =-- - , ~ ,--=- '..Yf ----- ~ ~,' \ '" I/r \ t:.: ~I\~~ ~,\ !1Jj' """u 1AI"= "L------' \1., ;of'\ ~ ' III ~¡---- ----- ,. ~ ~ 0 -, ~ ~ f-- /~ J - ~ ,. TT1H h J i~ '...---- -~ /' ~ Om u~ . r i f-- -- ;::::-, ~ ' œoa~1 l --------- \ -~ - -- ----1~'+--J-,',: ,~ . .! .,-~-:::::;: a ~ I !!::~ -_._~ VlN\()~I1VO 'vlnO3W31 SlN3VŒ:lVdV 3ÐOII:J If1n:>3VHl I' ;~ I.. 111~tilH~IIIIIJI¡I~I:~'l ~ ~ . ¡ = ¡ ! ! ¡ ! J ¡ : ¡ ¡ ¡ : ! ! I !1I¡dnnn¡¡¡!!¡nl In!!!llnnnn!nn ..................... ¡ ! . I j I~q ~ l(j! ~~:~ " ~ ~¡ . ,i I! II II J II ,I II ,I ,I ,I '! II Ii II ~1d!!~1!!!1!d~! III 'I III ¡ I, i~~8~~~n"~h~~~~~i R00offi0@o00@OO00ffil H I, II C III ¡III H'I II ~ 111'11 ~i:tIII.;1 ¡I¡I!I , :111" 1Íi11!¡'i¡\! !. !l1.1i ~ ,I I'!!! II ! I' ¡I! 'I ¡ ¡!! ¡I !I ¡!I¡ ,I II 11'111:1 ¡d'I'>" i III ill! ¡II .' .. Ib! ~II < II II I I ~ !" 'II ,II \ :!~ :í: ::: ::: :, ¡Ii ¡Ii ¡Ii ¡Ii ~ I ,II: III: III: III: I~ ~ Illi ¡IIi ¡Iii ¡IIi 1 § I!I'!!I' !!I'!!I' ~ ',.1 '..1 '"I '"I '. -<J \ II 1111 lIiI I ilil ilil :111111111 :111111111 g I '" "" I '" "" ~'" ------[]]M1S VÐVMO~ / ~----------~ \ .~:.~::~ ~_._el VINOO"'1VO 'V1n03>'131 SlN3r1H!VdV 3ÐOIH VlnQ3r131 I I: !~ 11~11!1¡llllmn\\,:; . H~H ~ l<iÎ ~~I <Ò ill I- 0 Z a ~ a z ill " ill .J ~ ¡:: ~ .J Il Il 0 IL . I I / / I / ~ 1:1 /1 I, If I" /1 . §~ ~-.-~l VIN\(HllV~ V1I1~31'13l SlN3VW:JVdV 3ÐOn:J Vln::>3W31 Ii h . 111~iil¡filllllll:lI11n ~; . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , , . . , . . , , . , , , . ¡: 1¡:¡¡:nn¡¡:I¡n: I I " I ¡ I~I .~~! n . I n I. I" ,I liII !II III ¡¡¡iii liJJ ÞÞ ::¡ :¡: 10' i.' lib lib 11111111 !!I'III' '"I. ", II!!!!!! ! IIII! III! ¡ ...t'.. h, III 'I' ,¡, Ii: I:: lib III: 1111 II!I ! !IIi !IIi I III! III! ~ II¡b I¡Ì! R ,.. I'" I' lilli, I' ¡II II Ip ¡II il ¡I t. I Hnl¡hll: '1 t I : II 111111 :I " Id'I,' I' .II! ill! II! 1I1!!hllllllltallllt I! .1 II II II II .1 eI.! II .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Ib, ! : ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ! ! ! : : ¡ ¡ ¡ : : ¡ : ¡ : : ~ !i! ! ! j ! ! ! ! ! !i! j! !! I i I I, ,I 11111' II ill II II 1111 i~hn~~~h"~kßd~dÞi ø000œ0@00ø@O0ø0œ~ . .';;;"-;;-;., ;;;;;... I, II ~ ,II ¡II .1:: n IIIIII : !I bl Ii. ! "..., :: ì!1 '11'11 p :: ¡Ii" " : 1!iI,I¡!1 1\. ~il'l.i .., I~:' I. ~il!l¡!!!ì . ,"- ..,--""" "_M~'_~ I I -~= a. ~ '=:;.'="~-:.-.: ~ --- ~--._- ¡ ~ ¡ ! ! ¡ ! ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ 1 ¡ ¡ ! .1 .1,I.i ,I ,I J II ,i ,I ,¡.I ,I ,I ,I !i! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !j! ! II I II ,I I,I I' I II ¡'I II i III inÞ".~~h"~h.J~dJI 1000ffi0@O00$OO00ffil VIN"O~IlVO 'VlnO3r'131 SlN3VŒIVdlf 3ÐOII:I \fln:J3¡'<31 li!~ III~: '1IIIl'~nnll; ~ lid. I e~~ I ¡ i@1 ~~~! " '"""'""",'",,, " " J ,. 1....111.......1.,... ,. 'I ¡, 5n!!llllnn:nlnp,-, 11.'1 ;¡" .. .. .. .. ,.. .. . .. .. .. I 5. U II ! !!U!!!!!!!!!!!H!!!! I H RbI ¡ I ii, II I Ilill! I' I' I I! IIII1 III! 11111 i li!1 d¡1 **! .OO.1\)0.~@9<Ð@O0@OI9@".@ lJ, ~t ~IM !II!II !II!II .t' ,s' ,,- .,- ;¡¡;¡¡. m;¡¡ . 11'111 III III . Ilh 1111 lid lId : '!I I!I a!l III ol ;' § 111'1111,' III,' III', ,~ ", ", '" '" ',:: I, II!! I!!! , II!!I!II , '11111 III! '11111 1111 \ R i "'1'" ¡ "'1'" , II !!III " ¡II !I . 'I" ¡¡'¡Îill, , , "111' I¡¡¡!il Ii III'I"!I' 1¡I!illl!!! ,¡ ,¡ !Ii! 1" ", """" . "1:"111111.11 ! i ! ! ! I;! 51 ! II ~!I~lh ' , " 'al , , , , , I.. .......... . i HI!!!!!i!!!!' :' i I dl 111M! I i [!J!iIllS~[J1 mlll¡¡jlll . I VINHQJI1VD VlnD31'131 IN3VWJVdV 3ÐOII:I VlO::>3V'131 I: b I ! a ! ¡I~~ ! ¡ 1*1 ~~~! . . ---------- ------------/~----J- <;"'~ -_----O3H1S VDvHO~ / _---~I I. -~~~ :\;¡:;~;d 'vi ëi~ '.1 I - .... I... I II ! I I II I! . !' II hllii Ii I ø~" IÇIoT I: ~3 . "" I VINHO~I1VQ V1nQ3N3.1 IN3WHIVdV 3ÐOIII Vln:>3W31 . . . .-:;:~ ::;~;J;;d\tëJ~;1 .... I-" 1 I 111 ! I I " II Hli Ii Ii 1 "~1 > 19O1 IlilllllllllllUt\11 ~ ~\ ! I . I j ~~~ I ~ Iii e~~1 I "'NlJOJllV~ 'V1n~3"3l IN3VUl:!VdV 3ÐOII:! Vln:)3VHl I ~ I ~~ . . --- --I ---=73i ,=;'~ .:"'~::.:~:.I\"""'\J. ...".'" v a a 1- .... ¡ - .- I I 1'1 d I ~I I ¡ '!, IIII"¡IIIII 1 øql} 190T ~ I VIN~O"I1V:> Vln:>31'B.l IN3I"UHlJdlJ 3ÐOIH IJlnQ3~31 II i~ llilllllllillmtm ~ ~! If. I . ! I~P ¡ 1$1 e~~1 I.."...... I...... . . ! ,..-,' ATTACHMENT NO.2 ) PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-_. R:\D Pl2004\04-G260 Temecu1a Rjdge Aparbnents\J>C STAFF REPORT.doc 9 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAO4-0260, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 UNITS AT THE APPROVED TEMECULA RIDGE APARTMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0317 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO RESULT IN THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 240-UNIT, TWO AND THREE-STORY APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH A POOL, CLUBHOUSE, WORKOUT BUILDING AND TOT LOT ON APPROXIMATELY 21-ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-011. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approved Planning Application No. PA99-0317 (Development Plan) for a 246-unit two and three-story apartment complex with associated amenities (T emecula Ridge Apartments) on August 16, 2000; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula appealed the Planning Commission decision and ultimately approved Planning Application No. PA99-0317 (Temecula Ridge Apartments) and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration related thereto on December 12, 2000 for a 220-unittwo and three-story apartment complex with associated amenities; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approved Planning Application No. PA02-0267 (Extension of Time) for Temecula Ridge Apartments (PA99-0317- Development Plan) on May 7, 2003; WHEREAS, AGK Group LLC., filed Planning Application No. PA04-0260 (Modification to an approved Development Plan), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on November 17, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission denied the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. RID P\2004\04-0260 Temecula Ridge ApartmentsIRESO denial.doc Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in denying the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Development Code: A. The proposed Project is not in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and specifically with the density requirements of the Land Use Element of the General Plan based on the following: 1. The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the Project Site as "Medium Density" which allows a range of seven to 12 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Project density is 11.5 dwelling units per acre, which is within the specified range. However: 2. On March 21,2000, the City Council adopted the Growth Management Program Action Plan as authorized by Section II.B. of the Growth Management Public Facilities Element of the Temecula General Plan. Section 2.B.1 of the Growth Management Program Action Plan provides: "Direct the Planning Commission to consider approving residential projects at the lowest allowable density in each density category. The Commission may consider approving a project above the lowest density if the project provides onsite or community amenities." 3. Based upon the factors set forth in the Land Use Element of the General Plan and the Growth Management Program Action Plan for determining the allowable density for a site, the following factors have been considered by the Commission as justification for denial: a. The Project proposes to add a third-story element to five Type 1 buildings which would create an increase in height and bulk of the project design and negatively affect aesthetics from Rancho California Road and adjacent single family residences. Staff believes the additional building height will result in an adverse aesthetic impact on existing views from the adjacent single family residences to the south. The Project proposes to increase the number of units from 220 (10.5 du/acre) to 240 (11.5 du/acre) and no additional onsite or community amenities are proposed. The Project does not have amenities sufficient to support the density being proposed. The amenities provided on-site were required in order to achieve the approved density. The Multi-Use Trails and Bikes Master Plan identifies Segment 17 to run along the westerly and southerly boundary of the proposed project and this trail has not been provided for the in the project design. b. c. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The proposed project would have an adverse impact on the general welfare because approving the additional units without any additional amenities would result in an undesirable precedent of approving project that do not provide sufficient amenities required per the Growth Management Program Action Plan. In addition, the additional building height is incompatible with the adjacent single family residences to the south and neighborhood compatibility should be maintained in order to profect the health, safety and general welfare. R:\D P\2004\04-0260 Temecula Ridge ApartmentsIRESO denial.doc . . . . . . Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant environmental impacts and has been found to be consistent with a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (adopted December 12, 2000). Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby denies Planning Application No. PA04-0260, a Modification of an approved Development Plan to add 20 units to Planning Application No. 99-0317, a previously approved Development Plan to design, construct and operate a 220-unit, two and three-story apartment complex with pool, clubhouse, workout building and tot lot on approximately 21 acres. No conditions are proposed for the denial of this project. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of November 2004. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004- _was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of November, 2004, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D P\2004\04-0260 Temecula Ridge ApartmentslRESO denial.doc