HomeMy WebLinkAbout080305 PC Agenda
---
-
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
August 3, 2005 - 6:30 P.M.
********
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 2005-055
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Chairman Mathewson
RollCall:
Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, Telesio and Mathewson
PUBLIC COMMENTS
.
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
. 1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 20, 2005
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2005\08-03-05.doc
COMMISSION BUSINESS
.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an
appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15
calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the
appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the
appropriate filing fee.
New Items
2 Plannino Application No. PA05-0053, a Development Plan, submitted bv Scott Barone of
Edoe. to construct two industrial buildinos and one office buildino totalino 116,496 souare
feet. located on the northwest corner of Reminoton Avenue and Diaz Road. Matthew Peters,
Associate Planner.
3 Plannino Application Development No. PA04-0577, a Comprehensive Sion Prooram, .
submitted bv Paul Gupta of Bianca Properties. for the Winchester Pavilion located on
Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue. located on Winchester Road west of Jefferson
Avenue. Harmonv Bales. Assistant Planner.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Wednesday, August 17, 2005, 6:30 PM, Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
.
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2005\08-03-05.doc
2
.
ITEM #1
.
.
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 20, 2005
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:30 P.M., on
Wednesday, July 20, 2005, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute.
City Clerk Jones duly sworn in newly appointed Planning Commissioner, Mr. Stanley Harter.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Telesio, Harter, and Chairman Mathewson
Absent:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comment.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 6, 2005.
2 Director's Hearino Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for June, 2005.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Harter who abstained.
R:\MinutesPCI072005
COMMISSION BUSINESS
.
3 Plannino Application No. PA05-0199. Consideration of Findino of Public Convenience or
Necessity. submitted bv Taroet. to allow alcohol beveraoe sales. located at 29676 Rancho
California Road. Veronica McCov. Associate Planner.
Associate Planner McCoy presented the Planning Commission with a staff report (of record).
Ms. Beth Aboulafia, representing Target Stores, spoke in favor of the Finding of Public
Convenience or Necessity to sell beer and wine at an existing Target store, advising that the
proposal would be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code and that it would be
compatible with surrounding uses.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Continued Items
For the record, Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that newly appointed Planning
Commissioner, Stanley Harter, would be abstaining on Item NO.4.
4 Plan nino Application No. PA04-0621. a Development Plan. submitted bv Vandana Kelkar of .
MCA Architects. to construct a 55.685 souare foot shoppino center with "Pad G" remainino
vacant for a future restaurant use on seven acres of the twentv acre propertv: five acres will
be desionated towards future commercial uses. such as mini storaoe. and the remainino
eioht acres. which includes a portion of the creek channel. will be preserved as open space.
located on the southeast corner of Butterfield Staoe Road and Hiohwav 79 South
Associate Planner Damko presented the Planning Commission with a staff report (of written
record), offering the following:
. That since the May 18, 2005, Planning Commission meeting, the applicant has added
architectural enhancements to the rear elevations of Buildings B, C, and D; glass
windows on the east side of Building D pop-outs ranging from one to two feet; decorative
tile accents; and a decorative canopy extending three feet over loading doors. These
enhancements will break up the mass of the rear elevation and provide architectural
detailing. The proposed development of the self-storage facility (Phase II) will block
these rear elevations from public view
. That the applicant has also provided additional architectural enhancements to the front
of shop D; a solid awning will extend 10 feet from the building to provide shade for
customers; flowering annuals, additional trees, potted plants, chairs and tables add to
the pedestrian friendly common area
. That Pad G could be used as retail or restaurant use
.
R:IMinutesPCI072005
2
.
.
.
. That staff would also request to modify Condition of Approval No. 61 to impose: that the
signal at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Wolf Store Road shall be
modified to accommodate full movement
. That a Condition of Approval be added to impose: A water Quality Management Plan
shall be submitted to the City of Temecula. The Water Quality Management Plan shall
include site design, best management practices, source controls, and treatment
mechanisms.
For Chairman Mathewson, Associate Planner Damko noted that the applicant would be in
agreement with the added Condition of Approval regarding a water quality management plan
and advised that .the initial study and State Clearing House was routed to Fish and Game and
South Coast Air Quality Management District but that there has been no response.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Mark Esbenson, applicant, spoke in favor of the proposed project, noting that the applicant
has added many architectural enhancements as requested by the Planning Commission.
For Mr. Esbenson, Director of Planning Ubnoske stated that the fountain that the applicant will
be installing would meet the criteria for Public Art.
In response to Mr. Esbenson's query, Senior Engineer Alegria relayed that he would be of the
opinion that the applicant would have an opportunity to receive Development Impact Fee (DIF)
credit for installing a raised median.
Mr. Esbenson expressed concern with Condition of Approval Item No. 21 (the applicant shall
comply with a letter dated May 17, 2005, see staff report) sent by Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's query, Mr. Esbenson noted that the towers in the
center of Building C would be four-sided architecture.
Commissioner Telesio expressed concern conditioning the applicant to provide an easement.
Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that Condition of Approval No. 21 would be a standard
Condition of Approval.
For the Planning Commission, Principal Planner Hazen stated staff was advised by Assistant
City Attorney Snow that the easement would be necessary to obtain drainage from the other
side of 79 South and that the plan, as proposed, will not interfere with the Flood Control District.
Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that an approach to Commissioner Telesio's concern would
be to continue the item to allow the applicant to address easement concerns with the Flood
Control District or that the Planning Commission could impose the condition as stated in staff's
report, and that if after discussions with Flood Control if the condition were subject to change,
the Planning Commission could amend the approval.
Mr. Esbenson relayed that he would be willing to accept Condition of Approval No. 21 as written
in staff's report.
R:IMinutesPCI072005
3
Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that it would be his opinion that Condition of Approval No. 21 .
would be a typical Condition of Approval.
For the Planning Commission, Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that the Condition of
Approval would by a standard condition and would recornmend that the Planning Commission
proceed with the Condition of Approval as written in staff's report.
For the Commission, Mr. Esbenson stated that he understood the condition as written in staff's
report and would work with the Flood Control District.
Mr. Steve Corona, representing the Corona Family, spoke in opposition to the requiring of the
proponent to grant an easement for a channel for which a location has not yet to be decided.
Mr. Corona requested that any granting of an easement be subjected to: A) proof that the
property in question has nexus to the flooding situation that necessitates the Flood Control
facility; B) that any easement be contingent on the final flood control facility location; and C) that
the property owner be compensated for the fair market value of the property; that absent
fulfillment of these requests, the City should move to obtain all land available for easements that
reside on the properties owned by Newland Communities.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation subject to all the
Conditions of Approval, modifying Condition of Approval No. 61 (that the signal at the
intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Wolf Store Road shall be modified to accommodate
full movement), and adding a condition requiring a Water Quality Management Plan as
requested by staff; that the applicant work with the Flood Control District regarding the
applicant's concern of an easement; and that the issuance of Development Impact fees be
determined by City Ordinance. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote .
reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Harter who abstained.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-052
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA04-0621, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A
NEW 55,685 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD KNOWN AS ACRE PROPERTY
WILL BE BUILT IN TWO PHASES AND WILL INCLUDE AN
OPEN SPACE PRESERVE
New Items
5 Plan nino Application No. and PA05-0066. a proposed Tentative Parcel Map. submitted bv
Vandana Kelkar of MCA Architects. to subdivide four commerciallv zoned parcels into seven
leoal lots with "Parcel 1" desionated as open space. located on the southeast corner of
Butterfield Staoe Road and Hiohwav 79 South
.
R:IMinutesPCI072005
4
Associate Planner Damko presented the Planning Commission with a staff report (of written
. record).
. That Condition of Approval No. 30 be revised to impose that the signal at the intersection
of Butterfield Stage Road and Wolf Store Road shall be modified to accommodate full
movement.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Mark Esbenson, applicant, relayed that he would be in agreement of the Conditions of
Approval as stated in staff's report.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the
revision of Condition of Approval No. 30. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and
voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-053
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF TE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA05-0066, A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33545, TO
SUBDIVIDE 20.33 ACRES (4 EXISTING PARCELS) INTO
SEVEN (7) COMMERCIAL PARCELS, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR
PARCEL NUMBERS 952-200-002, 011, 012, 013
6 Plan nino Application No. PA05-0100. a Development Plan. submitted bv Peter Mieoar. to
construct a one-storv office buildino totalino 12.411 souare feet. "located on the southwest
corner of Madison Avenue and Bueckino
Associate Planner Damko presented a staff report (of record).
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. David Body, architect for the proposed project, relayed that the height of the cornice would
measure 12 inches in height and that it would be cast into the concrete.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern with the lack of architectural elements and
requested that the applicant work on the rooflines, add more pop-outs, larger parapets, and add
more architectural elements.
.
At this time, the public hearing was reopened.
R:\MinutesPC\072005
5
For the Commission, Mr. Minnegar noted his willingness to work with staff to address the
Commission's concerns. .
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Cornmissioner Chiniaeff moved to continue Item NO.6 to August 17, 2005, for staff
and the applicant to address the Commission's concerns. Commissioner Guerriero seconded
the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
7 Plannino Application No. PA05-0101 a Development Plan. submitted bv Peter Mineoar. to
construct a two-stOry office/show room buildino totalino 23.618 souare feet. located at the
end of the cul-de-sac of Madison Avenue. west of the Interstate 15 freewav
Associate Planner Damko presented the Commission with a staff report (of written material).
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Peter Minnegar, applicant for the proposed project, noted that he would be willing to work
with staff to add more architectural elements.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation subject to the
condition that the applicant work with staff to add more architectural elements including the
windows and parapets. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected .
unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-054
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0101, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A
TWO STORY OFFICE/SHOW ROOM BUILDING TOTALING
23,618 SQUARE FEET LOCATED AT THE END OF MADISON
AVENUE, WEST OF THE 15 FREEWAY, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 910-282-012
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT
Commissioner Guerriero thanked staff for their quick response to ensure that Lowe's does not
impose their fire lane with advertising.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No report at this time.
.
R:\MinutesPC\072005
6
.
.
.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:55 P.M., Chairman Mathewson formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular
meetinq to be held on Wednesdav. Auqust 3. 2005 at 6:30 P.M., in the City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Dave Mathewson
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
R:\MinutesPCI072005
7
.
ITEM #2
.
.
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
Prepared by:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 3, 2005
Matthew D. Peters, AICP
Title: Associate Planner
File Number PA05-0053
Application Type:
Development Plan
Project Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CEQA:
(Check One)
A Development Plan application to construct two industrial
buildings and one office building totaling 116,506 square feet on
6.72 acres at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Remington
Avenue (APN 909-370-023).
C8l Approve with Conditions
o Deny
D Continue for Redesign
D Continue to:
D Recommend Approval with Conditions
D Recommend Denial
D Categorically Exempt
(Class)
D Notice of Determination
(Section)
D Negative Declaration
C8l Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Ccnter-Comm DP\Planning\ST AFF REPORT.doc
, I
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
Scott Barone, Edge Development
.
Completion Date:
February 17, 2005
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
August 3, 2005
General Plan Designation:
Industrial Park (IP)
Zoning Designation:
Light Industrial (L1)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant, previously graded
North:
South:
East:
West:
Existing industrial development
Existing industrial development
Vacant land
Vacant land
Lot Area:
6.72 acres net
Total Floor Area/Ratio
116,506 SF / .398%
Landscape Area/Coverage 62,845 SF / 21.5% .
Parking Required/Provided 278 required / 303 provided
271 standard and 7 handicapped / 292 standard and 11
handicapped
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
r:8J 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
The application was submitted February 17, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on March 24,
2005 to discuss site, landscaping, architecture, and other department issues. The applicant
resubmitted plans on April 14, 2005. A meeting was held on May 19, 2005 to facilitate a
conference call between the applicant and Roger Cantrell to discuss architectural comments.
The applicant resubmitted plans on June 1, 2005. The Site Plan was slightly modified after the
June 1 resubmittal in order to address the Fire Department's requirements for hydrant
locations. Conditions of Approval were granted by all departments by June 29, 2005.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\STAFF REPORT.doc
2
.
.
.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project conforms to the development regulations of the Light Industrial (L1) zoning district.
The building setbacks exceed the minimum requirements of the Development Code, and the
0.398 Floor Area Ratio is below the target ratio of 0.40 for this zoning district. The proposed 32
percent lot coverage is also below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 40 percent. The
proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles.
Architecture
The proposed building is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The
buildings will be constructed of concrete tilt-up panels, with architectural enhancements to
include entries enhanced with glass and metal canopies, horizontal reveals, varied base and
accent colors, and slate accent tiles, which provide visual interest. In addition, the field and
accent colors will be reversed on the office building to provide further variation and interest. The
buildings include various breaks in the wall planes and parapet design and height which, in
conjunction with landscaping, breaks up building mass from the street view.
Landscapino
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and
Design Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen onsite parking
areas and effectively soften building elevations. The project proposes to landscape 62,845
square feet or 21.5 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum 20 percent landscaping
requirements of the Light Industrial (L1) zone. Landscaping will be enhanced at the corner of
Remington Avenue and Diaz Road, and at the entries off Remington Avenue and Diaz Road. In
addition, decorative paving and strategic placement of Date Palms and Red Crepe Myrtles will
enhance the building entries. A combination of Sweetgum and Canary Island Pines will soften
building elevations. Outdoor employee seating areas are proposed for each building.
Access. Circulation. and Parkino
The project would provide orderly development at a major industrial intersection. The buildings
would align in a large rectangle bisected by the parking aisles connected by two access points,
one off Remington Avenue, and the other off Diaz Road. This results in orderly appearance of
building setbacks aligned along the street. The layout also maximizes parking and presents the
simplest possible circulation pattern. Loading areas are screened and located at the back of the
site. The project provides 303 parking spaces, which exceeds the 278 required by the
Development Code,
The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impacts of the project and has
determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes associated with the approved
General Plan EIR. The Fire Department also reviewed the plan and determined that there is
proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center~Comm DP\Planning\ST AFF REPORT.doc
3
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
.
[8] 1. An initial study has been prepared and indicates that the project will have the following
potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as
conditions of approval. Based on the following mitigations, staff recommends adoption
of the mitigated Negative Declaration for the project.
The proposed project could violate any air
quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality
violation; and
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations; and
Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people
Limit heavy equipment during any remaining sit
grading or prepa.ration to an aggregate daily use of
no more than 44 hours.
Limit heavy equipment during building construction
to an aggregate daily use of no more than 69
hours.
All heavy equipment shall be maintained in a
proper state of tune as per the manufacturers
specifications.
Heavy equipment shall not be allowed to remain
idling for more than five minutes duration.
Trucks shall not be allowed to remain idling for
more than two minutes.
.
Electric power shall be used to the exclusion of
gasoline or diesel generators and compressors
whenever feasible.
Construction activities shall minimize obstruction
of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site and, if
necessary, a flag person shall be retained to
maintain safety and adjacent to existing roadways.
On-site documentation shall be maintained for City
and/or SCAQMD inspection indicating all
construction activities including equipment
maintenance and daily equipment use. Aggregate
equipment use shall not include any electric-
powered equipment (but shall include the
operation of any generators).
The application of paints and surface coatings
shall be limited to no more than 28 gallons per
day.
The applicant shall abide by any other measures
as approved by the City of Temecula and/or .
SQAQMD.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\ST AFF REPORT.doc
4.
.
.
.
The proposed project could disturb any
human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries.
The project could expose people or
structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
1. Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or
based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault. Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
2. Strong seismic ground shaking.
3. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
4. Landslides.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant
must enter into an agreement with the Pechanga
Band of Luiseno Indians that addresses the
treatment and disposition of all cultural resources,
human resources and human remains discovered
on-site.
The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of
all cultural resources, including archaeological
artifacts found on the project site, to the Pechanga
Band of Luiseno Indians for proper treatment and
disposition.
The applicant shall provide an on-site
archaeological and paleontological monitoring
during all phases of earthmoving activities.
If sacred sites are discovered during ground
disturbing activities, they shall be avoided and
reserved.
The applicant shall comply with all the
recommendations in the Geotechnical Report and
Compaction Test Results Frough Grading
Operations completed by EnGen, June 9, 1999, as
updated.
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Development Plan
application PA05-0053 based upon the findings and attached Conditions of Approval.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Camm DP\Planning\ST AFF REPORTdoc
5
FINDINGS
Development Plan
(Code Section 17.05.010F)
.
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Industrial Park (lP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General
Plan has listed the proposed uses, including the light manufacturing, warehouse, and
office, as typical uses in the Industrial Park designation. In addition, the proposal is
consistent with the development regulations of the Light Industrial (L1) zoning district.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Industrial Development Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in
regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that
the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public .
health, safety and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Vicinity Map - Blue Page 7
2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 8
3. PC Resolution No. 2005-_ Development Plan - Blue Page 9
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
4. Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 10
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Camm DP\Planning\ST AFF REPORT doc
6
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
VICINITY MAP
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Cenler-Comm DP\Planning\STAFF REPORT.doc
7
.
D"'t?RD
.
~
------------
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PLAN REDUCTIONS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\STAFF REPORTdoc
8
~!~
I, c ci
"'- " "","! 13 ~
I~, ,_.-, :> t;
~:'''f'' \, ( >
J \ll~\) l:: ~
.
!.t:
..,U
i I!l ~ . in .
10 i 'i III ."
II ; ! II," '.0.....
~ I illl! Ii! illli!I!! 'iL"
~ !~~~e. !;~~:.! 3i~II:1 ~~~! ~~e .,;:'i
~ t;ll':l !S.~ I ild':l. !~~!. ,-':I !i~
~ jl:;:" 51 . r ~~!" _~~
!.II d'! .d,'- ",! o! '"'.
~ !Ii
~ wi~
/"1
"II. ,
t ;~! ~ i ~
'I' '1.'
~ ~r j: _ J
11',,- .'
r ~'1~6qi
!tEd;
,
,'J,I'J "II,II.J
~!. =1 ~. p. !, II'
:: q ;' ~ ~ "'; ,; i
.
! Hi Hi
~~. ~.. I I
f ~- ':l ':l H.!::;~
! ~~~i iii. i ~ f1l rn _. !oo i ~:~:~~!
; -":os RU. "" W ~ . jj ;j!~il !iii:
! d'j' . 'i I, , h'h!' .",."'
, '!! ~I~~; i~ ~i'~6' ~~ ~
Ii! ! I ; I' IIi; ~';' """0' !
!:Iilhid!,f.ai J liliillil!li i il! Ii
8~ ::~
11 Ii : I;
It. d;,,", I!:illl d!"d
6~~H! ~~~~~u It~itrl' ii~li..~
Cd j[~ln i~u~~~ ~~mi _ ~m!i~
to :~ ~~t. :~! I 1~!
g I r I! !
n i g I
I Ii .lg!
, l!~ mi
I ~ i ~
'I !! !
Ii !I i I
!
!
i I. t..~ 5
I':! I':!'
",.. It::rl'.
hill:'"
~"'t J.~!U
'Iii!: ib.,!
!1I OOJ
i i i
.
,,~
K~
"'
I
':.i
.,
:j
..;,
.,
,I
,
: i
'1
.
'-I
. .
.
: j
(\
l::1
r,
. l::l
I 21
! 5
d! 0..
I!li ~I
~ :l ill] CIJ
~
T----l
,
't
,
~I
-";J] !I.
j, ~'
1""". ,.,,"" ~
~ i
.L ;
~
.
I!
:,
I
Ii!
.0
m~
0; .
.-J-
ij
"
~!,
I'
o
~
~
~
~
ili
w
w
9
.
~
w
@
~
"l
~
Q
05
@--
e
18
I
"
ll!l"j. '" I ,~ I"" '" I .-" i1f" '" I .,.
------~-----------_.-.---
",,,! .-. l" '" I ._. l" ,,,! '''' I
I --.~-p- )----1--.1--
. . I .
'" r" "If" I "-. r" '" I "':~
. ,. .'. .P.
"'!I ,-l-:r '" -r---", I '" r-
I; .
I ,
",' . . . il'. . -- .
'~'1 .,. I -,. ,. .,. I ',- ,I f" .,. ~ /. I: I:
~_ ..... ~_.. ~_.. _w ,,_w .._~ _'" "_",/ .._~
..... ...
.......... I ,/
"J~]"~>J" - '" !---=-'l/:-r~-
---p,d~:+---I-~-
I . ....."-.Jik..... ' _ I _
'" r" /""1 "~"J" if" I ,,'
-.,. /~r--"j--=--t<"~J-=-"
..-../ ,-'" "-" I ,,-'" ,-" "-'" I.... ,,-..
, .
--
,
!I
I U
~ I ,Iii Ili.l h jl
~ I. ~~ I~'~ .~ l~
i !j!'li1i!I!
~ IIli II
~ iii' d
II i
U N
~ '!
q, !
.. . il ~
. II .,
. .
: . I
. (I
1]HI: Cl
, I
r,
CI
..J
il
~I
z,
-- :'5
. i ~
" I LL
n
it
"
it
~ l!!!!j ~! I ! I
~ - -
~ ' ,
,.. ~" f I ~ ..If , , !
~ ,..... ~,. - . - ~.
I ~. v "
! I' - 1 I --
I,' 'I" II
"h/; II 'd' II
11!!j!ll! !illil ill Ii!
I,
11
(;;'
II
11
U
lL
~ 11
'"'
!1
I
.-
.
.
.
&--------. - ---
I
.
II i
~ .~
"
~ .
~ . ~
. .
. i
\,
c:
<>:
C!l
z
is
...J
5
'"
,
I
z
:5
ll..
LL
o
o
cr:
.
i
(&~
:0;-.,
III
Ill'! Ii -.> !II
11111, 'I IiI
1" II' I
I" I I
, I
.
II
II
II
~)
H
1'1 Ii'
Iii III ,
,~'t,
(~}~ 1\
"
{7 i
i'l ,"'" I
, l,c' I("'l
(~)-- 'i ; 11' Ii!
H ,Iii
.Ii 1 Ii .
:1"+'1
',II r-.
!" I .
" 0,1' 11
(_)__ i:,' i: '
" ( " , "
\1 lil!
il I! II
, .! i,'
I' i
II
Ii
II
i
II
"
" ~ -
e e
, .
. 0
, "
w .
o D
~ . ~ Si
. ,
.1
<(
eJ
Z
is
..J
3
CD
,
(f)
z
o
~
..J
W
0:
o
ii:
w
S<
w
.
.
.
.
u
-l---- "
I 11
I! "'I' f' i '"
Ii 11,_
I--~,-"'hr',,,
:::l j_
il 111"'1 " '~ ~i
..1 III I _
.. '''.. u'" I!
-~ Ii I
I _~_I: 111 ..':
j
! ~
.,
!I
1/
r
I
~---+-
I
I
11
e--j
0-[-
~ O!! Ij
~ ~'!! d rn
J' · ~
i Ii, 1'1 I Iii ,! j
I,ll .o. .1.,
. r ~
~ I-l!! Illl Ii I!
~ Ij.; ',';'1 II
i -,..!!
ill!lll
~ II I' i I
~ ~~I
~ . I
- ,
i .~ i
~ . ,
. i
. I
(I
C:I
r,
C:!
en
(!J
z
.,,9
5
en
,
(fJ
z
:5
0-
0:
o
9
u.
~ .
.
~
~
· '!
'II Ii '! II Illl111! II ! : :
I! 11111 . i
illll Ii II 11111"111_. (I
II!IIII" III 1::1
0--' III
h 3 r,
~
II! 1::1
'I Ii III ro
.. i. 1 ('J
l .
I b e--: . .Ii ~I z
II I is
I ' . 'I ~ ...J
..--, '11 5
' , -I ~
@-- i : ro
,
(/)
e-i z
0
~Pi @)--, ~
~i I!', if;
II ,Il !! ...J
e- , !I w
I I r:r:
11I1 0
a:
lib w
1111 Ii I' "'1 S
II . II 'Ill
"
I' II II i,ll Ii 11 1'1' <<l
II ! ! !I!I II Il '!II z
II II I'll :5
! ! 1 ! <l.
, U.
0
0
r:r:
r:.) i)
,
I
l~f'W
. . "
\ "@1T@r'@-
I.@ I @
,1- u/ },.". ~
'- ."_. II':; """ ", i ",
liII ' .!.
(0;'>--.
- 1 I',
cc9--i---T
~_~___.-'--"---___,_.._.._ - __._._.________.u__.. _.___._ .__ ..___.__
.-
-,
~::' ml:-'/
\-1 \' \.....
,e;'
(~~
.
fi '
!I 'iT-i"
,II :
/ i *'
-I' - l--m
I. i i il:
. -Jl-r -- - Tl'---. , 1,,:5:
. __.It +.
' 1,1,1
E)--
(.;i 1
(0-
(m:
0--
" H
,I 11
, ,
'1Il'lll
~ ~." ~ ~. . i
S ~. !'
~ ,! i!
i ~!! i ~! ! i
~. ~ ~ !!
ill; II! I. II!
g 111!!1l Ii!!il
III ';;)'f
!' r"l'
. il
.. H
~ I'!, Ii 'j!h iI il
< 1 ~~ '~j;~.~
~ ; i' !l'i! i! i!
~ '1'- 1'1-,
~ . .
i 111111 II
i! I! II
.
A
@_u
j
.
(?> -,
,-I
i
,
f
r;:;1-'-!
;;
I'
"
(~"..,..
,,"" TIT
II
,/
(~)-_.
,~,
T 11
1.1
!
,
"?1
I. ~_..
11
iH
.,-f:'....-
'-1' II
~, :~f
'_..;!--r...._..
I
.1_
(~)_..
I, I ':
_ --.. II.. ,- ,....+ - -
\~'.'.._,.
(:;,-.
II IIi !ji,di
Ii !I !! 1!1
II 1I Iln II
/
I !i!llWl
,,' I,;
II! ,ll hi
.!llt ..
~/-' ':~' .':_~-
i
'.
(.:\.-
II
"
E!
II H
,.it
11- i 1- 1'1
!h', !hl, !!'llI
I !1I!1l !I
II i.~t~ it !I U ~,~ ~l .~;
.,1 :. ..I:~ '.,,!:: .j.
" \("'; [I .h.,-t'f,' - ~I'
It' -11;"':(,",;" fl
'--------I-,H'_, I'
"', .....il.,'jl'".:.1
::) 'I~.:~:.: .." ~
'1"-'/'1; I). . ii;
I !(,.~). ,-; 'i ~ I' m
'I! !~ . i ~ :1 ~
I ,~~ .' ',', <. 'I ~
to)"",' 'p: I ~
'I' '''''.,
a I ". I! .. ~
!It ;., ,;
~ '/;'; II!
ill 11"1" lit
I ,I
I I
. H !. I'
II I;' ,II .1
'I ,II ill. iI
,.,It ..7-
,:~)
I.
.!
_~ 1~
(~\-'-.c
I'. ""I~,,,'! I
1 ~_" '", : ~
i ,..1 ~
(~';__ I;..:~ '1 ~
., II ~
.------- c::; .; I,' ~
I' _.i ::, V',. 1,
ir~l 1. .. ~ ,: . II
: ":
"
(~)-.
r";H
III
f'
,Ii
I'
i
~. Ip
i.1
i"
. ~.."
'1'-1"1'1'
g I,! ~
'It . !I!
I ,II;
II i
~ '1
1.[ ~
'J'
.1
(I
C:I
rl
c:!
z
~
~
()
(!l
Z
Ci
...J
5
OJ
,
(J)
Z
o
~
...J
W
a:
o
a:
w
8
<<S
Z
:5
a.
u.
o
o
a:
(J)
z
:5
a.
a:
o
g
u.
lil
Ii! ~
il'l;l
j, ~I
wi
51
lfll ~
l!ll
!ill
1'!
l-;
~::~i~
~,
,~,:~:1 :;V: I" ,; .
, . !i j~
"'I' "~,....
:.' y" I. -;;<11';1' I,'" -.,
/'.~. J .1" III
~,,":~ . g ""- l!!
'i-; , II'. IIllifi!" II'
1J(111j'1j,;.;, I
11 !~ t~lt~;~
I'I~ f:'I<i~'
S.!;Wit";I\
. ,
~~!;t
">J::"""'; . -'~"
8""*'
+:.'.lif,:,': ~r. r
'--"ii" ;-.
:i..Joj.,;_""j "I
\l(<\~-r~~t:: l
""-' r.;Li.- T'" ~" F
:,~'t\~ ~jJ ~ ~ ~.
~
lnf ~~
II!!
II"
I"
"
.'
J'}!f.r:~
11:11:1,';
I., ,I,'
n
II
II
I
I.
t~
"
il
II
III
~
"i
II'
II!
II
......J
"t~~'.:~1
.""~
~;1'~4!~~\',W~
'.; > 'jl
.~:;.;\I:;. '. 'I'
i*"~'@': I __ ~lj
:(';ii ~:~:. --lr , - II
"'11'.""'1 I
'Ii;;: . . -- .
;!!I~"" ,
'~"ri~\' ','"
j'1~1':!i!~r!f';;- Hl
-;;-"1 ';'II'I!"" Hi
;,{~')l~;J ilr~, jh
"'\-''''''{,!,-l''-';' 'i
-;:";;~:'.-~"~;~\~'r ~r -5
. .-,~ -',
~:.'~:.;~(;'"
. ,,l~'-i:i~
j~L:i\
'',>':.~;
'}"_--f":{~t
~~. ~}~~~:1{;'lr
......'..'1'
;-:'~f~1;-.I~ .'
'>;~,'
.~. -~fi".-.-:;
,h
'II
I!
,
iJ
III
!II
----
...,'..'
.JI~~~ J~.: "
' . '..' '1" li"I": II
":")c1J;lrf II
: j'J0"" I, ,III! II
'''''~,'':'I.k I I
<;;\, .'=':tl
'f
"
~ i
i
~ ~
~ ..
~ ~
<
<!l
Z
9
5
lD
UJ
Z
o
t=i
~
W
II:
o
a:
~
o
W
II:
9
o
u
.
~
:g
lj'
II
I ~lll
/" i
i-
,l:'" II' I '~ -"", '.
C" d' "co'" 'sll
~. ,"~'. "" "..... r
:jlf"T!jl~!!I! 1111
-"l ,.."r,' I~:!': i 1111
"',1;,;, !II,~1~II,,'c Ill! II
.n~;I'&'~~' t I
)ct ""0'~,," ;
;4:1.:!Irfi(~:'.'
.
\
Ijf
'!ll
, 'I
I,l,
rpl
OJ
<!l
Z
15
...J
5
OJ
(f)
Z
" i 0
'I , ~
I. ~ ~
II w
'" 0 a:
0
,ill a:
,Ill E
h ;v
i! c
w
a:
9
0
()
~
~
i
o
~
o
0
Cl
z
9
5
lD
,
en
i z
0
~
~
w
a:
0
it:
w
III ~
Cl
'Ii w
I a:
9
0
0
~
~
I ~
~ ~
I !,
;l,!: I
!~U I }
1I" "
!llal!!
"!'I,,'
1!.1 III
1"'1,'1
~ihl~
~ ,,,11,\,
~I ~ ~ .,.
pW:ROAO
\-
-----,
I
:
\
I.
\
\
.\
\
\
I
i
I
I
1
1
i
~i
<I
~.
"I
..
'I
~.
I
1
I
1
I
i
!
I
1
1
1
I
L!..l:J
'II
l.
~i.
l
:i! ~ J
!5~,... ~ iO!
o u5:"i ~
~ ~~"- ~~
5= ~:l
~ :~ ~ i~
:i '.il:E 6 'il
~u'd'
:J l2" ."5 !l~
~f~;l
~
..~
zlI:
<(w
...J......
ll..Z
ClW
Zo
~w
<(......
[[<(
>-lI:
0:0
<(0..
~lI:
~O
mo
0:>-
ll..o
d
UJ
--I
~
~w"" ~
. ~~g:!~E~
~ >w",,,,_:::;,,-
0:::;;;:<'11"'''';::
:$z"'S'6~;:::-
D z 0 ...:"'-et:
III "''''u~.,.,<(
1I:,;:e:; ':n::;-:::<:g
": ~b~e~t3';"
W -'u "'-''''<l-
iI: ~:ga~~~a
ll.... w.... >- I "- U ID
I.... (L 0
SN -,
o
~
,
, ;!; ~
! ,
W < ,
I , ,
: I !
~!!iU! i ,
!HUH I I
1....""" m i 1111 I ! i
~~~~!H! . ~ i
" ~~~~~. ~
I I II !l! II ~ ~ ,11,11 , "
.
~E!iZ~~ . i I
, ~::: ; ~ :; z ~ ~ -. , ,
; I
~~3~H~~ H ~ ~.:l.:l , ,
" ! ,
<>. ~ i; " '" i; ~ -. ~-~~~~
. .
l
, L L i !
~ n ~f
I ~ n ~ ~ '! ,; Ii , I I
~ ,,~ ~ z ~ !
Ii! i I'!! ~ ~ ~ -, I
, ~~~~~ip
I ~d ~~n ~~ .H~_~
,I I I I
01 I !. . ,
! . .1 II I
'I':!! ~ J ~ => I I
~ i " ~ ~ ~ !
~q~~~~ ~d~.p~ ,
I ~~~Z5~ ~ ~ ~ "c f I .
'p!T' H Will iI'
, "Ill 'I
! It ,1. . I'
~L~} !~ , ^
~~t ~B~~; :~<!:~u~'~8 .!3~1
~ I l ,< uL ~~~;li~r$~di
~~ fi;und~ ~::J t . > ~ .
~, O@OO ') ., 'm 0
~!~~@ 0> e ,; I.
~ml::I:~ I !~~m$nrliidl
":.:L' .' ::;
~ "Ill!",
~ r .n : u.
, · ldll. ....
!.!di!., '11111
nl! lllfp i'll "
~ ill: i ,( i i Ii! III i Ii III i
z>t:;
<'"
e-1....
o..z
'"
ou
25",
~....
<<
>t:;>t:;
00
0..
:;]~
::>0
....u
0..>-0
"'u
u<
Zo
0",
Ue-1
/
/
I
I
I
I
I
I /
I
I
I
L__
:;... .
;'3me._.~~~!~.e
Ik;
~ a ::j!: :
1,'3'>,.':,' 1
i:::.. '!
:::I:j:,>iii:]
I~W~' :: :.~ :i"
!'"IIPi~ih,1
~~n~.rluilll'll
iiuimllll ~!I
MM.:MeQee*cibdl
!l
.. 1/
n .
I U;
1'i!
,
II
"
~ ~- I
",
~' ~I i!
" ,
. !I
"
"
"
.. II
'I
I,
II ~ .
!I ~~ j!
.;,
!
I.te 1
"I' 'I"'!' ;:"
!'I!' I , 'j- I., i'l.,1 !
;'1',11 !ii ;, ii! !,ii,! !:::: 11 ~
'''' I Ii "91 . ~ IIi'" i ~!.
.,1;1 iiI -. ~ ;; II_ ;i~ ~s n 'l'l ei
1iI111! !l:: II!! liiil !!II l:ml IS"
, .
, " , ~'"
"1 I, I t
~III!I~iiU ~1il!1! I,!!!,
l!W [~IU! ~m! .!
I
"j !I
I.
~~ II
',; \ ;
, .,
"
I
r
@)
-
.
l
i
I
I
Ii!
.
~ III
g dl
:;; 111
m I,,, i
e 00
----
-~-_.
~----
.
.
1,1,111:,11,1
hlllll!,,!!IIIII,
~1!llnllll,I!!II,'ljl
~ I I " I! III 'I! "
~ ! , !!lll"' IIII I! 1I!11
.II:.!!I.'!!"!
---
.-----'..
- _.- - - -----
OV'OHZ"iIO
------~---------
--------
~.
~.- .--
,
\
,
\
,
\
,
\
,
IW
,"
1m
, ~
z
o
e-
el
Z
:E
,W
iet
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
;,l!"
j hI!
"m
\J ~ J
,-
<
c
/
\
,
,
\
\
" 'I'
I" .
I.! Iii!
il"l!1
I JII!di
liil,ln
-,. .
I
II
,
.
I~
I' N
. I 'I!' ".-.,
'i" :rffl
II. I! jl"! I I 'II ~:Wltl
w 1111 ,LI!II \ '!!l!!' !! 1"1 I $,-;';./
oj , " !" l I r i ~ !! I
nlll'ii!llllhll!I!!lilrd ~Ill! I ill E' I
~ . i' I I! I I '" ~ . ~ 0 I'
I ill,l,! IUill! ,tl!! 1!li! 11111 !,! ~! ! ! ! II i 1 hI!
Idi !lPilll I i I': 11111 0 i I
!l !,i : Ii II ill Ii Ii ill iI1,lIq!! I! !! I ~
.. ,... ,\,', ,,1111"
... Jlil.
~
,
,
J
~
o
~
"
~
~
~
.
w
~
\~.~
(~
"
"
<
"
"
o
~
,
g
..
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\ST AFF REPORT.doc
9
.
.
.
"
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0053, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT
TWO INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND ONE OFFICE BUILDING
TOTALING 116,506 SQUARE FEET AT THE NORHTWEST
CORNER OF REMINGTON AVENUE AND DIAZ ROAD, APN
909-370-023.
WHEREAS, Scott Barone filed Planning Application No. PA05-0053 (Development Plan
Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered 'the Application
on August 3, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to and based upon the findings
set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the
Application, hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the
Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Industrial Park (IP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General
Plan has listed the proposed uses, including the light manufacturing, warehouse, and
office, as typical uses in the Industrial Park designation. In addition, the proposal is
consistent with the development regulations of the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporale Ccnlcr-CoJJUll DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
I
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare. .
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Industrial Development Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in
regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure
that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the
public health, safety and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality
Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the
potential environmental effects of the proposed Project. Based upon the findings contained in
that Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the project could
have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been
prepared.
Section 4. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves Planning Application PA05-0053 with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit
"A", attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all
necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 3'd day of August 2005.
Dave Mathewson, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
2
.
.
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3fd day of August 2005, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAiN:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
,
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Camm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S_doc
3
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Corom DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
4
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA05-0053
Project Description:
A Development Plan to construct two industrial
buildings and one office building totaling 116,496
square feet located northwest corner of Remington
Avenue and Diaz Road.
APN:
909-370-023
MSHCP Category:
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Buildings A and B - Industrial, Building C - Office
Buildings A and B - Industrial, Building C - Office
Buildings A and B - Industrial, Building C - Office
Approval Date:
August 3, 2005
August3,2007
Expiration Date:
WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
G:\Planrung\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\PlalUllllg\PC RESO & COA'S.uoc
5
.
.
.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
6
.
.
.
Planning Department
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly
notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action, The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this development plan.
5. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void, By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
6.
The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year
ex1ensions of time, one year at a time.
7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage,
8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan
and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
9. The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar maiters are specified, shall be
deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent
of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to
substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the
regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Material
Field Paint Color
Accent Paint Color
Accent Paint Color
Blue Glass
Color/Specifications
Frazee #8531 W "Lombardy Mist"
Frazee #8522M "Downing Slate" ,
Frazee #8525D "Rock Garden"
Viracon V8-5
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & CQA'S.doc
7
Blue Vision Glass
Window Mullion
Viracon
Anodized Aluminum
.
(Field and Accent Colors reversed for Building C)
10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
11. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department
inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
12. Applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures of the Negative Declaration.
Public Works Department
13. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
14. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
15.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
.
Building Department
16. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
17. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County
area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this
ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the
time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of
Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
18. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Cenler-Corrun DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
8
.
25.
26.
27.
. 28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
.
19.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
20.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April
1,1998)
21. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
22. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
23. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems
24. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
prior to permit issuance.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons
with disabilities.
Show all building setbacks on site plan.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the
approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m,
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays
G:\Planmng\2005\PA05"OO53 legacy Corporate Cemer-Conun DP\PJanning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
9
Fire Department
.
35. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
36. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 3250 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 5100 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903,2,
Appendix III-A)
37. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 4 hydrants, in a combination of on-site
and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire
access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart,
at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the
street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow
shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing
fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
38.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required. (CFC 903.2)
.
39. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
40. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
41. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec 902)
42. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches, (CFC 902.2.2.1)
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-00j3 Legacy Corporate Ccnter-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc .
10
.
.
.
43.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2,2.4)
44. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via
all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902,2.1)
Community Services Department
45. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
46. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
47. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
48. All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the
property owner or maintenance association.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
II
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corpornte Center-Conun DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
12
.
.
.
Planning Department
49. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector
check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
50. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
51. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any
artifacts or other objects which reasonably' appears to be evidence of cultural or
archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the
City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the
affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion
may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to
allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to
inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find.
Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the
Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall
authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other
corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning."
Public Works Department
52. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
53. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
54. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check, The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
55. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and
shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction.
56.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed pUblic or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Centcr-Comm DP\Planning\P<;: RESO & COA'S.doc
13
and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of .
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access' easements necessary
to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
57. NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-
construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-
phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the
City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for
Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction
Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development
Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include
a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs
to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff
year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction
BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the
approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project
proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term
maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
59. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
58.
.
60. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
61, The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. This project shall
comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may include
obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall
be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Ccnter-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'$.doc
14
.
.
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Corom DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
15
.
.
.
Planning Department
62.
The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to
not adversely impact the grow1h potential of the parking lot trees.
63. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X
10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the
colored architectural elevations, All labels on the Color and Materials Board and
Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
64. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site.
These shall be clearly labeled on site plan.
65. All downspouts shall be internalized.
66.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
c. Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans.
d. Detail of outdoor employee eating area. This area shall include a trellis with
appropriate vines to shade the outdoor employee break area, decorative furniture
and hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the
Planning Director.
e. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
f. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
g. Totai'cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
h. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details
the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper grow1h
and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The
approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance
contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
67. Landscape Plans shall reflect the following:
a.
The applicant shall provide a minimum 5" width planting area at the ends of all
parking rows. The planter length shall be equal to the adjoining parking space.
The planter shall contain a minimum of one tree, shrubs and ground covers.
G:\PlannJng\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
16
b.
The applicant shall modify plans, providing additional landscaping to the east of
Building B loading area to fully screen the loading areas from Diaz Road as
approved by the Director of Planning.
.
c. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval with the
landscape construction plans, which details the proper maintenance of all
proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development
for the long term aesthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program
shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be
responsible to carry out the detailed program.
68. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall
show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not
to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all
light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
69. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange".
70. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing
plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The
numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow
paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street
and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
.
Public Works Department
71. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401and 402.
d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
e. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
72. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Diaz Road (Major Highway Standards - 100' RNV) to include installation
of sidewalk, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water and
sewer), raised landscaped median.
.
G:\P1anning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
17
.
Improve Remington Avenue (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to
include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, utilities (including
but not limited to water and sewer).
73, The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
b.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: medians, sidewalks
and drive approaches.
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Sewer and domestic water systems.
d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
74. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department
of Public Works.
75. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
76. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent
property.
.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
78. The'Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object
to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge
and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western
Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
77.
79. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
.
Fire Department
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system
plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a
registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and
conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are
signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention
Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and
accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being
placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704,3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24
1-4.1)
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Ccntcr-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
18
Community Services Department
80. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Ccnler-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
19
.
.
.
.
.
.
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY
THIS PERMIT
G:\Planrung\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S_doc
20
.
.
.
Planning Department
81. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant
shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment
from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it
is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs' of building
parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the
project site, the developer shall provide screening to be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Planning.
82. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with
the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
83. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for
a period of one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at
a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished
grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each
entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly
and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons
with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles
may be reclaimed by telephoning 951 696-3000."
84.
85. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
3 square feet in size.
86. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be
installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
87. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
Public Works Department
88.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
G:\Plunning\2005\PAOS-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Carom DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S_doc
21
a. Rancho California Water District
b.
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
.
c.
89. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
90. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
91. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
Fire Department
92. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
93.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family
residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
.
94. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10. CBC Chapter 9)
95. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
'Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10)
96. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser door. (CFC 902.4)
97. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
98.
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planmng\PC RESO & CQA'S.doc
22
.
.
.
99.
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article
81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
100. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the
developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground
tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other
hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention
Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
101, Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted
and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all
fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA -13,24,72 and 231-C.
102. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for approval.
103. If there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall
submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County
standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information.
The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and
projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau
must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of
this condition.
104. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
105. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the City; should
any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce
any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
23
.
.
.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & CONS,doc
24
.
.
.
106. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated March 7, 2005 from Rancho
Water.
107. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated February 28, 2005 from the
California Historic Resources Information System.
108. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated April 13, 2005 from Riverside
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
@
Itada
Water
Board of Directors
Csaba F. Ko
President
Ben R. Drake
Sr. Vice President
Stephen J. Corona
Ralph H. Daily
Lisa D. Herman
John E. Hoagland
Michael R. McMillan
Officers:
Brian .J. Brady
General Manager
Phillip L. Forbes
Director of Finance-Treasurer
E.P. ~Bob. Lemons
Dirt'CtorofEngineering
Perry R. Louck
Director of Planning
March 7, 2005
Matthew Harris, Project Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589 - 9033
SUBJECT:
f, .~ i l~'
; ~.
,.
, ,
'MAR 1 4 Z005
,
t~i '/ ~::7--
/
.,
WATER AND SEWER A V AILABILITY
LEGACY CORPORATE CENTER; PARCEL NO.1
OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28657-1 APN 909-370-023
PA05-0053 [SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INVESTORS]
Dear Mr. Harris:
Please - be advised that the ?bove-rcfererrced prcperty is located vlithin th~
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water and sewer
service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site
and/or off-site water and sewer facilities and the completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD,
JelTD, Arm"'on, This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium
Controll" development, with individual building owners and an Owner's Association
LDintd't,:.F""o,/oAd " , maintaining the common property and private water, fire protection and landscape
lsnc .,.,creary mmlstratIVf.'
8m',,, Mon.,,, irrigation facilities. RCWD requires that the City of Temecula include a
C,MiehaelCowell Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water
Best Best & Krieger LLP
Genem' C."n,,' facilities, as a condition of approval for the project. In addition to this agreement,
RCWD would require individual water meters for each condominium unit.
This project should be conditioned to use recycled water for landscape irrigation.
A Sewer Release Form should bc received from RCWD prior to construction
permit issuance.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900,
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
4~ (Qlh
"",'\'I"'J.~ H,'\.NCII()
~~'~<!'J C:ALIF()I,f:NI,"
f ~ \,VATEI.f.
.( I>ISTH:IC'"
.\""'''''''_''''.',"""~'.'I..,,,
<'-',.r'"
Mi lael G. Meyerpeter, P.~.
Development Engincering Managcr
05\t-.1M:ac055\FEG
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
HiH1Cho Califorllia Water Disll'id
42135 Winch('~tf,r Boad . !'ost 001<:00' Box 9Ul; . TL'nwcula. C:.lirornia 92[,8~.!1017 . \951 \ 29/;.6900 . FAX <9511296-6800
RECEIVED: 2/28105 3:15PM; _>r y Orlcl\I~(';ULA; Hbbtl; ......Al:it:: ~
.
.
.
FEB-28-2005 15:21
RRU,~IC/ANTHRO UCR
951 827 5409
P.03/03
CALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
Phone (951) 827-5745
Fax (951) 827-5409
EaS1ern Information Center
Department of Anthropology
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521-0418
February 28, 2005
TO: Matt Harris
City of Temecula Planning Department
RE: Cultural Resource Review
Case: PA05-0053/Legacy Corporate Center
Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information
System have been reviewed to determine jf this project would adversely affect prehistoric or
historic cultural resources:
The proposed project area has not been surveyed for cultural resources and contains or is adjacent to
known cultural resource(s). A Phase I study is recommended.
Based upon existing data the proposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources.
A Phase I study is recommended.
A Phase I cultural resource study (RI.
J identified one or more cultural resources.
The project area contains, or has the possicility of containing, cultural resources. However, due to the
nature of the project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not
anticipated. Further study is not recommended.
L.. Two Phase I cultural resource studies (RI.20B2 and RU-20B2 (both part of larger projects)) identified no
cultural resources within the boundaries of the project area. Further study is not recommended.
There is a low probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
L.. If, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the
immediate area while a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations.
Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the area, earthmoving during construction should be monitored
by a professional archaeologist.
The submission of a cultural resource management report is recommended following guidelines for
Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic Preservation,
Preservation Planning Bullerin 4(a), December 1989.
_ Phase' Records search and field survey
_ Phase II Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for "significant" sites.]
_ Phase III Mitigation (Data recovery by excavation, preservation in place, or a combination of the
two.]
_ Phase IV Monitor earthmoving activities
COMMENTS:
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Eastern Information Center
EIC\FRMS\TRANSMIT
..........-r"'. ,....,..-"
WAKRlN 0. WILLIAMS
Gcn~g~r-Chid Enginl.:l..Cr
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.955.1200
951.788,9965 FAX
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
941861 .
City ofTemecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
April 13,2005
Attention: Matt Harris
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
P A 05-0053
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in
incorporated Cities, The District also does not plan check City land use cases, or provide State Division of
Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such
cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage ,Plan
facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or
extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In
addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard,
public health and safety, or any other such issue:
.
The entire boundary of the property is within the 100 year Zone AE floodplain limits for Murrieta Creek as
delineated on Panel No, 060742.0005B dated November 20, 1996 of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in
conjunction with the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA), A District flood study in 1987 determined the base flood elevation for the master plan flow
rate of28,500 cfs to be 1035,08 (NGYD 29) at the location,
Thc U,S, Army Corps of Engineers along with the District and the Cities of Temecula and Murrieta are
working on the design of the Murrieta Creek Flood Conrrol, Environmental Restoration and Recreation project
(Project), which has been Congressionally authorized, The proposed development is located within Phase 3 of
the Project, which is currently not scheduled to be constructed until October 2006, pending Federally allocated
funding, Questions regarding the Project may be addressed to Zully Smith of our office at 951,955.1299.
Untii the proposed Project has been constructed, all new buildings should be floodproofed by elevating the
finished floor a minimum of 12 inches above the District's floodplain elevation of 1035,08,
This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta CreeklTemecula Valley Area Drainage Plan
for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid prior to the issuance of building or
grading permits, Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual penn it.
GENERAL INFORMA nON
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board, Clearance for grading, recordation or other final approval should not be
given until the City has determined thaI the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
.
.
.
.
94186,1
City ofTemecula
Re: P A 05.0053
-2.
April 13, 2005
If this project involves a FEMA mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all
studies, calculations, plans and other infonnation required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further
require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation
or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy,
The applicant shall show written proof of compliance with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(MSHCP) for any drainage facilities the applicant proposes to be maintained by the District. All applicable
CEQA and MSHCP documents and permits shall address the construction, operation and maintenance of all
onsite and offsite drainage facilities, Draft CEQA documents shall be forwarded to the District during the
public review period,
If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant
to obtain all applicable Federal, State and local regulatory permits, These regulatory penn its include, but are
not limited to: a Section 404 Permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in compliance with section
404 of the Clean Water Act, a California State Department ofFish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement
in compliance with the Fish and Game Code Section 1600 et seq., and a 401 Water Quality Certification or a
Report of Waste Discharge Requirements in compliance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act or State
Porter Cologne Water Quality Act, respectively, from the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board,
The applicant shall also be responsible for complying with all mitigation measures as required under CEQA
and all Federal, State, and local environmental rules and regulations.
Very truly yours,
~~
ARTURO DlAZ
Senior Civil Engineer
c: Ron Parks, City ofTemecula
Zully Smith, RCFC & WCD
AM:blj
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.4
INITIAL STUDY AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Camm DP\Planning\ST AFF REPORTdoc
10
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Pro'ect Title
Lead Agency Name and Address
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location
Project Sponsor's Name and Address
General Plan Desi nation
Zonin
Description of Project
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Other public agencies whose approval
is required
.
.
Environmental Checklist
Le ac Cor orate Center PA05-0053
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Matthew D, Peters, Associate Planner (951) 694-6400
Northwest corner of Remington Avenue and Diaz Road, APN 909-
370-023 in the Cit of Temecula, Count of Riverside
Scott Barone, Edge Development, 27368 Via Industria, Suite 101,
Temecula, CA 92590
Business Park BP
Li ht Industrial (L1)
A Development Plan to construct two industrial buildings and one
office building totaling 116,496 square feet on 6.72 acres, This
Project is an in-fill development on a previously graded site within an
industrial area.
Surrounding land uses include a light industrial building to the north,
light industrial buildings to the south, and vacant land to the east and
west.
None
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\lnitial Study. doc
1
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages,
x
Aesthetics
A riculture Resources
Air Qualit
Biolo ical Resources
Cultural Resources
Geolo y and Soils
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
H drolo and Water Qualit
Land Use and Plannin
Mineral Resources
Noise
Po ulation and Housin
Public Services
Recreation
Transportationrr raffic
Utilities and Service S stems
Mandato Findin s of Si nificance
None
x
Determination
On the basis of this initial evaiuation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be repared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
X be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the pro'ect ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be pre ared,
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment. and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentialiy significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, An ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must anal ze onl the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
im osed u on the ro osed ro'ect, nothin further is re uired,
~~\r,~
Signature
Date
It ~ 0'1
Matthew D, Peters. Associate Planner
Printed name
Citv of Temecula
For
.
G;\Planning\2005\PAOS-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm OP\Planning\lnitial Study. doc
2
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a,
b,
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources
Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees. rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic hi hwa ?
Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
ualit of the site and its surroundin s?
Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Inear orated
Less Than
Significant
1m act
No
1m act
x
X
c,
X
d,
X
Comments:
1. a.-c: No Impact: The proposed project is not located on or near a scenic vista; therefore. there will not be an
adverse impact on a scenic vista, The project site is not located on a scenic highway. The project site is
currently vacant with no structures, trees or rock outcroppings on the site, Therefore, the proposed project
wouid not substantially damage scenic resources, including trees, rock outcrop pings or historic buildings, Due
to the fact that the project site is vacant with no scenic vistas or resources, the project would not substantially
degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings, The plans have been reviewed
and elevations are consistent with the City's Design Guidelines. No impact is anticipated as a result of the
proposed project.
. d,: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is currently vacant with no sources of light or
'are, The proposed project will introduce new generators of light and glare typically associated with light
industrial development. The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Mount Palomar
Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance 655), Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid
glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Lighting issues are addressed during
the City's plan review and inspection process, No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm OP\Planning\[nitial Study. doc
3
2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as
an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a.
Issues and SU rt\n Information Sources
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-a ricultural use?
Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
of Farmland, to non-a ricultural use?
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Ineor orated
less Than
Significant
1m act
No
1m act
X
b,
X
c,
X
Comments:
2. a,-c,: No Impact: The project site is not currently in agricultural production and in the recent and historic
past the site has not been used for agricultural purposes, The site is not under a Williamson Act contract nor is
it zoned for agricultural uses. This property is not considered prime or unique farmland of statewide or local
importance as identified by the State Department of Conservation and the City of Temecula General Plan. In
addition, the project will not involve changes in the existing environment, which would result in the conversion.
of farmland to non-agricultural uses. No impacts are anticipated as a resuit of the proposed project
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center.Comm DP\Ptanning\fnitial Study. doc
4
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e,
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air ualit Ian?
Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existin or ro'ected air qualit violation?
Result in a cumulatively considerabie net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed uantitative thresholds for ozone recursors?
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of eo Ie?
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Inear orated
No
1m act
Less Than
Significant
1m acl
x
x
x
x
x
Comments:
3, a,: No Impact: The proposed project will not conflict with the applicable air quality plan. The project site is
comprised of 6.72 acres and the proposed development includes two industrial buildings and one office
f'lding consistent with the zoning and general plan designations for the site. The General Pian EIR assumed
t development would occur on the subject site consistent with the General Plan land use designation of BP
usiness Park), This General Plan designation is implemented through the City's LI (Light Industrial) zoning
designation, The General Plan envisioned target floor area ratios (FAR's) for these designations and the
General Plan EIR analyzed the potential impacts from potential uses in the LI zone, A Statement of
Overriding Considerations was adopted with the General Plan EIR for City-wide Air Quality impacts, primarily
from mobile sources. The proposed project was anticipated as part of the Industrial Deveiopments for the City,
In addition, an URBEMIS emissions modeling report was completed for this Project, which concludes that "All
emissions are well within their requisite threshold values and long term emissions are less than significant. No
operation mitigation is warranted," No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
3 b, d, and e,: Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: An URBEMIS emissions
modeling report was completed for the Project, which identified that "Construction activities would result in the
generation of air pollutants. Emissions would primarily be 1) exhaust emissions from powered construction
equipment, 2) dust generated from earthmoving. excavation, and other construction activities. 3) motor vehicle
emissions associated with vehicle trips, and 4) hydrocarbon emissions from the application of asphalt, paints.
and coatings," Both the grading and building construction phases could exceed the daily threshold for Oxides
of Nitrogen (NOx1 emissions. Additionally, building construction is anticipated to create significant Reactive
Organic Gas (ROG) emissions, primarily associated with the application of paints and coatings, and mitigation
is warranted to reduce these impacts to less than significant levels, The following mitigation measures are
required to reduce emissions:
.
a. Limit heavy equipment during any remaining sit grading or preparation to an aggregate daily use of
no more than 44 hours,
b. Limit heavy equipment during building construction to an aggregate daily use of no more than 69
hours.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\lnitial Study.doc
5
c. All heavy equipment shall be maintained in a proper state of tune as per the manufacturers
specifications,
d. Heavy equipment shall not be allowed to remain idling for more than five minutes duration.
.
e, Trucks shall not be allowed to remain idling for more than two minutes duration,
f, Electric power shall be used to the exclusion of gasoline or diesel generators and compressors
whenever feasible.
g, Construction activities shall minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site and. if
necessary, a flag person shall be retained to maintain safety and adjacent to existing roadways,
h. On-site documentation shall be maintained for City and/or SCAQMD inspection indicating all
construction activities including equipment maintenance and daily equipment use, Aggregate
equipment use shall not include any electric-powered equipment (but shall include the operation of
any generators.) ,
Paints and Coati nos
i. The application of paints and surface coatings shall be limited to no more than 28 gallons per day.
Miscellaneous
j. The applicant shall abide by any other measures as approved by the City of Temecula and/or
SCAQMD,
3. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerabie ne.
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal 0
state ambient air quality standard, An URBEMIS emissions modeling report was completed for this Project,
which concludes that "All emissions are well within their requisite threshold values and long term emissions are
iess than significant. No operation mitigation is warranted." However, the proposed project will emit typical
emissions and dust associated with industrial construction. The applicant is required to comply with the
mitigation measures outlined above, No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
.
G:\Ptannjng\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\lnitial Study.doc
6
a,
b,
c.
d,
f.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project?
Issues and Su rtin Information Sources
Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans. policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U,S, Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interru tion, or other means?
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or im ede the use of native wildlife nurse sites?
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation Ian?
Comments:
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Inca orated
No,
1m act
Less Than
Significant
1m act
x
x
x
x
x
x
4. a.-f.: No Impact: The project site has been previously graded and does not contain any natural biological
resources. including wetlands, riparian forests, vernal pools, and nursery sites. The project site has been
grubbed and disturbed for many years in order to comply with the City's Weed Abatement Ordinance (Chapter
8,16 of the Temecula Municipal Code). In addition, the project site has been graded, There are some grasses
on the project site, however they are not considered sensitive habitat, nor is the site a part of a wildlife corridor.
The site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. Habitat Conservation fees will be
required as a standard condition of approval to offset the effect of cumulative impacts to the species from
urbanization occurring throughout western Riverside County.
The project is within the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), The applicant filed a Habitat
Acquisition and Negotiation Strategy (HANS) application. The City of Temecula has not identified this property
as a candidate for habitat acquisition. AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc, conducted a habitat assessment
for the Burrowing Owl (Athene cuniclaria), No burrowing owls were found on the site, Finally. the applicant will
, required to pay MSHCP mitigation fees. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
G:\Plannjng\2005\PA05~0053 Legacy Corporate Cenler-Comm OP\Planning\lnitial Study.doc
7
b.
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in Section 15064,5?
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeolo ical resource ursuant to Section 15064,5?
Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or uni ue eolo ic feature?
Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Inca orated
Less Than
Significant
1m act
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
No
1m act
a,
x
x
c,
x
d.
x
Comments:
5. a.: No Impact: As identified by UC-Riverside Eastern Information Center. Department of Anthropology, two
Phase I cultural resource studies (RI-2082 and RU-2082 [both part of larger projects]) identified no cultural
resources within the boundaries of the project area. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed
project.
5. b.: No Impact The above mentioned Phase I surveys did not identify any archaeological resources nor did
the historical records search identify the project site as a potential site for archaeological resources pursuant to
Section 15064.5. In addition, the City of Temecula General Plan (Figure 5-6) does not identify the project site
as a sensitive archaeological resource area,
5, c.: No Impact: The City of Temecula General Plan (Figure 5-7) does not identify the project site as a.
potential site for paleontological resources, The project site has been previously mass-graded, However, if any
cultural resources are identified on site during the construction process, the mitigation measures identified
under Item 5,d will address any discoveries. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
5, d.: No Impact: The phase I survey did not identify the project site as a potential site for historical resources,
including human remains. No impacts are anticipated, however. mitigation shaH be required as part of the
mitigation monitoring program to ensure proper treatment and disposition of any unknown cuitural resources
that may be inadvertently discovered during ground breaking activities,
a, Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant must enter into an agreement with the
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians that addresses the treatment and disposition of all cultural
resources, human resources and human remains discovered on-site.
b. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources. including archaeological
artifacts found on the project site, to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians for proper treatment
and disposition,
c, The applicant shall provide an on-site archaeological and paleontological monitoring during all
phases of earthmoving activities,
d, If sacred sites are discovered during ground disturbing activities, they shall be avoided and
preserved.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\lnitial Stu.dy.doc
8
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
Issues and Su rtin Infonnalion Sources
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involvin :
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geolo S ecial Publication 42.
ii. Stron seismic round shakin ?
iii. Seismic-related round failure, includin Ii uefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b, Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil?
c, Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
s readin , subsidence, liquefaction or colla se?
d, Be located on expansive soil; as defined in Table 18-1-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or ro ert ?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
Potentially
Significant
1m ael
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Inear orated
less Than
Significant
1m act
No
1m ael
,x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
6. a, i-iv: Potentially Significant Impacts: In 1999, a Geotechnical Report entitled, "Geotechnical Report and
Compaction Test Results Rough Grading Operations" was prepared for the project area. According to the
study, "The graded site in the areas noted as graded is determined to be adequate for the support of a typical
commercial development." Any potential significant impacts will be mitigated through building construction,
which will be consistent with the Uniform Building Code standards. Furthermore, the project will be conditioned
to provide a soil report concurrent with the submittal of precise grading plans and recommendations contained
in this report will be used to determine appropriate conditions of approval prior to the issuance of grading and
building permits, The soil report will contain recommendations for compaction of the soil, which wili serve to
mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction,
subsidence and expansive soils, The following mitigations measures shall be implemented to mitigate sections
a.i. through iv:
a, The applicant shall comply with all the recommendations in the Geotechnical Report and
Compaction Test Results Rough Grading Operations completed by EnGen Corporation. June 9,
1999, as updated.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Ptanning\lniUal Study. doc
9
6. b.: Less than Significant Impact: The project will not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.
The project site is relatively flat will be developed in accordance with City standards, including National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards, which require the implementation of erosio.
control and best management practices (BMP's). The Final Environmental Impact Report for the City 0
Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or mudslides located on the site or proximate
to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6. c,: Less Than Significant Impact: The project is not located on a geoiogic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide. lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse, A geotechnical report has been prepared for the proposed
project (EnGen Corporation, 1999) and has not identified any geologic unit or unstable soils that would become
unstable, The project is required to comply with the recommendations in the report. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
6. d,: No Impact: The project is not located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property. According to the Geotechnical Report
completed by EnGen Corporation, the soils tested had expansion indexes ranging from 0 to 3, corresponding
to a very low expansion potential. The project is also required to comply with the Geotechnical Report
prepared, No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6, e,: No Impact: The project site will not utilize septic tanks. The project wiU connect to the public sewer
system, No impacts are anticipated as a result of this prpject.
.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05.Q053 Legacy Corporate Center~Comm DP\Planning\lnitial Study.doc
10
7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
PolentialJy
Potentially Significant Unless less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Suooortina Information Sources Imnact Inco"';;oraled Imoacl Jmoacl
a, Create a significant hazard to the public or the X
environment through the routine transportation, use, or
disposai of hazardous materials?
b, Create a significant hazard to the public or the X
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c, Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or X
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existinq or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of X
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e, For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
workino in the proiect area?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
workino in the proiect area?
g, Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan? ,
h, Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss. X
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Comments:
7. a.: Less Than Significant Impact: The streets leading to the project are not transportation routes
designated for commercial haulers who may be transporting hazardous materials. However, because the
property and the surrounding area are and will be used for industrial buiidings. iuture tenants may include
businesses that require the delivery of hazardous materials. When an application is made for future tenant
improvements, a Statement of Operations and a Business Plan will be required for review by the City's Fire
Department to identify the likelihood of hazardous impacts and to assess the appropriate mitigation measures,
Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7. b.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project proposes two light industrial buildings, Since the activities of
future tenants will be addressed during tenant improvements as noted in g,a, above, it is not anticipated that
I project would create a significant hazard to the public or the environement through reasonably foreseeable
et and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Therefore.
ss than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
G:\Planning\200S\PA05-Q053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Pfanning\lnitial Study.doc
11
7, c,: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is within one-quarter mile of a proposed college
campus site at the northwest intersection of Dendy Parkway and Diaz Road. The operation of construction
equipment and machinery during the development of this site may emit some hazardous emissions, However.
these emissions should be of limited quantities over a short duration of time, Less than significant impacts are
anticipated.
7, d,: No Impact: The project site is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials
sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, would not result in a significant hazard to
the public or the environment. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
7, e-f, No Impact: The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a
public airport or private air strip. No impact to people working in the area or airport uses is anticipated as a
result of the proposed project
7, g,: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area and is not a portion of an emergency
response or evacuation plan. Therefore the project would not impair the implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated as
a result of the proposed project.
7. h,: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in or near a wildland area that would be subject to fire
hazards. The location of the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk or
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, No impact is anticipated as a result of this project.
.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm OP\PJanning\lnitial Study.doc
12
,
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Suooortina Information Sources Imoact Incoroorated lmnact Imnacl
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X
requirements?
b, Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g" the production rate
of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
wouid not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which nermits have been qranted)?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river. in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d, Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would resuit
in floodino on- or off-site?
e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
. systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
Otherwise substantiallv degrade water qualitv? X
g. Place housing within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area as X
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
man?
h, Place within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area structures X
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ioss, X
injury or death involving flooding. including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
i. Inundation bv seiche. tsunami, or mudflow? X
Comments:
8, a,: No Impact: The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements,
Development will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board, No grading shall be permitted until
an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES
requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. No impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
8. b,. f,: No Impact: The proposed project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
abstantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering
wrhe iocal groundwater table level. The project will not have an affect on the quantity and quality of ground
waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, The proposed project is required to comply with local
G:\Ptanning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center~Comm OP\Planning\lnitial Study.doc
13
development standards, including lot coverage and landscaping requirements, which will allow percoiation and
ground water recharge. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project
8. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainag.
pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which woul
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site, The proposed project will include an on-site drainage
plan; however it will not alter off-site drainage patterns or alter the course of a stream or river, and will not
result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site. The project is also required to comply with Best
Management Practices (BMP's), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations as well as
National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPEDS) standards, which addresses drainage, siltation and
erosion. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
8, d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The 'proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially
increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site because
the project will not alter the course of a stream or river. The City of Temecula Public Works Department
reviews all drainage plans and determines adequate drainage facilities are in place capable of on-site drainage
and that off-site drainage facilities can accommodate additional flow. A less than significant impact is
anticipated as a result of the proposed project
8, e.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff. The project is required to comply with Best Management Practices
(BMP's), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations as well as National Pollution Elimination
Discharge Elimination System standards, which address drainage and polluted runoff, A less than significant
impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
8, g.: No Impact: The proposed project is not a residential project and therefore will not place housing within.
100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map 0
other flood hazard delineation map. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project
8, h,: Less Than Significant Impact: A portion of the project is located within the 100-year flood limits of
Murrieta Creek, thereby placing within a 100-year flood hazard area improvements that could impede or
redirect flood flows, Conditions of approval will require the submittal of a drainage plan to address flow and
drainage facilities. and payment of flood mitigation fees to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
8, i.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is located in a Dam Inundation area for the Lake
Skinner and Diamond Valley Reservoirs. Said dam is a 43,800 acre-feet earthen dam located to the north east
and a failure would result in the flooding of Murrieta Creek. In the event of a massive dam failure, there is a
potential for structure loss, however this is considered a remote potential. Minor dam failure would not result in
significant loss of structures or loss of life, injury or death on the project site, A less than significant impact is
anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
8, j,: No Impact: The proposed project is not located near a coast line which would be subject to inundation by
seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
.
G:\PJanning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Cenler-Comm DP\Planning\lnitiaJ Study.doc
14
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a.
b,
c.
Issues and $u rtin Information Sources
Ph sicall divide an established communit ?
Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning or9inance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
Potentially
Significant
1m act
POlentiaUy
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Incor orated
No
1m act
Less Than
Significant
1m acl
x
X
X
Comments:
9. a,-c: No Impact: The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, currently zoned Light Industrial
(L1), and will not divide an.established community or conflict with the appiicable land use plan. The iong term
vision of the project is light industrial uses to promote the development of attractive comprehensively planned
uses that will provide the City with a sound and diverse industrial base.. The project is consistent with the
applicable Muiti Species Habitat Conservation Plan. In addition. the applicant fiied a Habitat Acquisition and
Negotiation Strategy (HANS) application, The City of Temecula has not identified this property as a candidate
for habitat acquisition.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a,
b.
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
eneral lan, s ecific Ian or other land use Ian?
Potentially
Significant
1m acl
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Incor orated
No
1m acl
Less Than
Significant
1m acl
X
X
Comments:
10, a.-b,: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area that is known to include minerals that are
considered of value to the region and/or the state. The proposed project will not result in the loss of a locally-
important mineral resource because the project site, is not identified as an important site known to maintain
such resources as shown in the Final EIR for the City of Temecula General Plan, No impact is anticipated as a
result of the proposed project.
.
G;\Plannjng\2005\PAOS-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\lnilial Study.doc
15
11. NOISE. Would the project result in:
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Sunnortinn Information Sources Impact Incorporated Imoact Imoact
a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in X
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
aoencies?
b, Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X
oroundborne vibration or ground borne noise levels?
c, A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels X
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
proiect?
d, A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient X
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the proiect?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
Comments:
.
11, a.-d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The site is currently vacant and development of the land will result in
increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long-
term. However, long term operational noise levels will be required to be within noise level standards
established by the Noise Element of the City of Temecula General Plan. No activities are anticipated within the
proposed project that would expose persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or
ground borne noise levels. The project will create some noise levels over that currently emanating from the
vacant land, However, those noises are not anticipated to create a substantial permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. The project may result in temporary
or periodic increases in ambient noise levels during construction. Construction machinery is capable of
producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet, which is considered annoying. However, noise from
construction of the project will comply with City ordinances regulating the hours of activity to Monday through
Friday from 6:30 a,m. to 6:30 p.m. and Saturday from 7:00 a.m, to 6:30 p.m. in industrial areas. No significant
impacts are anticipated,
11, e,-f,: No Impact: This project is not within two miles of a public airport or private airstrip. Therefore,
people working in the project are will not be exposed to excessive noise levels generated by an airport and no
impacts will result from this project.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\lnitial Study.doc
16
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a,
b,
c.
Issues and $u artin Information Sources
Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure?
Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housin elsewhere?
Potentially
Significant
1m acl
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Incor orated
No
1m acl
less Than
Significant
1m acl
x
x
x
Comments:
12. a,-c.: No Impact: The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The
project site is a light industrial project and residential uses are not proposed. The project site is vacant and will
not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, as the site is developed within a iight industrial
zone. The project will neither displace housing nor people, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
th the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services?
a
b
c
d
e
Issues and Su rtin Information Sources
Fire rotection?
Police rotection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other ublic facilities?
Potentially
Significant
1m acl
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Incor orated
No
1m act
Less Than
Significant
1m act
x
X
X
X
X
Comments:
13. a,-e.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will have a less than significant impact upon. or result in
a need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The project will incrementally
increase the need for some public services, However, the increase is expected to be a very small increment
that can be addressed through the City's budget process, As a result, the project will have a less than
significant impact upon the need for new or altered public facilities, The project will not have an impact upon,
and will not result in a need for new or altered school facilities. The Rancho California Water District has been
made aware of this project. Sewer and water is currently provided for the surrounding industrial development,
~ extending service to this site is possible, which would result in less than significant impacts as a result of the
.,ject. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-D053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\lnitial Study. doc
17
a.
Issues and Su ortin Infonnation Sources
Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facilit would occur or be accelerated?
Does the project include recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Potenlialty
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Inco orated
14. RECREATION.
Less Than
Significant
1m act
No
1m act
x
b,
x
Comments:
14. a.: No Impact: The project is a light industrial project in a light industrial zone, The project will not displace
recreationally zoned lands or remove vacant lands that are used for recreational purposes, The anticipated
need to increase the neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities as a result of this project is
not anticipated. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14. b,: No Impact: The proposed project does not include an open space or recreational aspect to the project.
Furthermore, the project will not require the construction or expansion of additional recreational facilities. No
impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
.
.
G:\Pfanning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\fnitiaf Study.doc
18
15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project:
a,
b,
c.
d,
e.
f.
g,
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources
Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity
ration on roads, or con estion at intersections?
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
mana ement a enc for desi nated roads or hi hwa s?
Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safet risks?
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e,g" sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incom atible uses e. "farm e ui ment)?
Result in inade uate emer enc access?
Result in inade uate arkin ca acit ?
Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g,. bus turnouts,
bic cle racks ?
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Incor orated
No
1m act
Less Than
Significant
1m act
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Mmments:
~. a,-b: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is located on the northwest corner of
Remington Avenue, and Diaz Road, There wiU be an increase in vehicle trips on adjacent streets once the
proposed project is developed. The City's Traffic Engineer has indicated that the project would have a less
than significant impact to the existing road system because the existing roadways have been developed
consistent with the City's General Plan in anticipation of the area's proposed industrial deveiopment. Due to
the project's consistency with the General Plan, no further traffic studies were required for this project. Less
than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
,
15, c,: No Impact: The proposed project will not have an impact on the air traffic patterns and will not result in
a substantial safety risk. This site is not within the French Valley Airport influence area. No impacts are
anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
15, d-f.: No Impact: The proposed project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project
is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards, The proposed project provides for
adequate ingress and egress from the site, The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed
project and have determined that adequate emergency access has been provided, In addition, on-site
circulation has been reviewed using the emergency vehicle turning radius templates and it has been
determined that on-site circulation is adequate for emergency vehicles, The proposed project will meet
industrial and office use parking requirements per Chapter 17,24 of the Temecula Development Code. No
impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
15, g.: No Impact: The proposed project is consistent with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting
...ernative transportation as identified in the adopted General Plan, Therefore, no impacts wiU result from this
.ject.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05~0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\lnitial Study.doc
19
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a,
b.
c,
d,
e,
f.
g,
Issues and Su rtin Infonnation Sources
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Re ional Water Qualit Control Board?
Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or ex anded entitlements needed?
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the pro'ect's solid waste dis osal needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
re ulations related to solid waste?
Potentially
Significant
1m acl
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
rnCQr orated
Less Than
Significant
1m acl
X
No
1m act
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments:
16, a,.b. e.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements.
require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project
will have an incremental effect upon existing systems, Since the project is consistent with the City's General
Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
16, C..: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities on site that will connect to the existing system currently in place along Remington Avenue,
The design of the existing system is sufficient to handle the runoff from this project and will not require the
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, Less
than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
16. d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor
require expanded water entitlements, While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems,
the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "RCWD anticipates supplying
water to 167,640 persons within its service area in 2020 (p, 5.14-3)." The FEIR further states: "EMWD
anticipates supplying water to 756,699 persons within its service area in 2020, (p, 5,14-3)." This anticipated
water supply includes a portion of Temecula. Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less
than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
16, 1. g, :Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any
potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation i':ja
Source Reduction and Recycling Programs. which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impact~
are anticipated as a result of this project.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\lnitial Study.doc
20
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project:
a.
b.
c.
Issues and Su rtin Infonnation Sources
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animai community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California histo or rehisto ?
Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited. but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
ro'ects, and the effects of robable future ro'ects?
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directl or indirectl ?
Comments:
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Inear orated
No
1m act
Less Than
Significant
1m act
x
x
x
ti' a.: No Impact: This site, which has been previously graded and is surrounded by industrial development.
es not contain any viable habitat for fish or wildlife species, This is an in-fill development and it does not
ave the potential to: degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods ,of California history or prehistory. No impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
17, b.: Less Than Significant Impact: The effects from this project are less than significant with Mitigation
Measures incorporated into the project. The project will not have a cumulative effect on the environment since
the project site is light industrial area in an urban area, surrounded by industrial development. All cumulative
effects for the various land uses of the subject site as well as the surrounding developments were analyzed in
the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. With the mitigation measures in place. the project will be
consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The cumulative impacts reiated to the future
development of this site will not have a significant impact.
17, c,: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not have environmental effects that would cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The light industrial project will be designed
and developed consistent with the Specific Plan, Development Code, and the General Plan, No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\PJanning\Jnitial Study.doc
21 .
18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR,
or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or
negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following
on attached sheets.
a. Earlier anal ses used. Identif earlier anal ses and state where the are available for review.
b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope
of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed b miti ation measures based on the earlier anal sis.
c, Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and
the extent to which the address site-specific conditions for the pro'ect.
SOURCES
1, City of Temecula General Plan.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
3, Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment, AMEC Earth and Environmental. Inc,. May, 2005
4. Geotechnical Report and Compaction Test Results Rough Grading Operations. EnGen, 1999.
5.
URBEMIS Construction and Operational Emission Estimates, Synect Ecology (Environmental
Consulting Services).
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0053 Legacy Corporate Center-Comm DP\Planning\lnitial Study. doc
22
.
.
.
.
.
By placing my signature' below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the
above-mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be
maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish
to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0199 Target PC & N\Planning\Draft-Final COA-largeI2.doc
5
.
ITEM #3
.
.
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 3, 2005
Prepared by: Harmony Bales
Title: Assistant Planner
File Number PA04-0577
Application Type: Sign Program
Project Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CEQA:
(Check One)
A comprehensive sign program for Winchester Pavilion
commercial building, located on Winchester Road west of
Jefferson Avenue.
[ZJ Approve with Conditions
o Deny
o Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
[ZJ Categorically Exempt
(Class) 15311
o Negative Declaration
o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
R:\Siglls\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\STAFF REPORT.doc
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
Paul Gupta, Sinaca Properties
.
Completion Date:
November 8, 2004
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
August 3, 2005
General Plan Designation:
Service Commerciai
Zoning Designation:
Service Commercial
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Retail/Office
North:
South:
East:
West:
Office
Retail
Restaurant
Retail/Office
Lot Area:
1,15 Acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio N/A
Landscape Area/Coverage
N/A
.
Parking Required/Provided N/A
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
[8] 1, Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that ali concerns have been addressed
regarding the Sign Program Application.
ANALYSIS
On January 1, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA 03-0176,
a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 17,505 square foot two-story commercial
building on approximately 1,15 acres, The project was conditioned by the Planning Commission
for the applicant to submit a comprehensive sign program to be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission, Sign programs allow for flexibility in association with sign area, number
of signs, location of signs and height of signs provided the program enhances the development
and accomplishes the objectives of the Development Code,
Construction of the building is nearing completion. The owner of Winchester Pavilion
commissioned Sign-A-Rama to prepare a Comprehensive Sign Program for the development.
On November 8, 2004, the applicant submitted a Comprehensive Sign Program Application for
the Winchester Pavilion two-story building, The sign program proposes 9 wall mounted signs
and 1 freestanding multi-tenant sign for a combined total of 10 signs,
.
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\ST AFF REPORTdoc
2
.
.
.
The sign program provIsions for wall mounted signs allow for internally illuminated channel
letters and logo boxes. Non-illuminated letters, as an alternative, shall be made of extruded
foam with acrylic laminated faces. A limited sign color palette is also proposed, The program
identifies specific sign envelopes in which wall mounted signs and logos will be located on
building facades. A maximum of one square foot of sign area is permitted per lineal foot of
frontage for all tenants, Wall signs for tenants occupying the second story shail not cover more
than 75% of the tenant's frontage. The maximum letter height within the center is 24 inches with
a minimum of 8 inches. Two rows of copy shall not be higher than 36 inches. The sign area of
the first story signs is 24 square feet and the second story is 18 square feet.
The program also proposes a new multi-tenant freestanding sign aiong Winchester Road, The
sign program allows for a 10 foot by 10 foot freestanding sign with 64 square feet of sign area.
The freestanding sign will be constructed of stone, tile and aluminum and surrounded by 200
square feet of landscaping. The minimum panel height allowed for each tenant panel will be 10
inches with the minimum letter height being 5 inches. This is consistent with Section 17,28.230
of the Development Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
[8J 1, In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmentai review. (Class 11,
Accessory Structures, Section 15311 (a))
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed Sign Program, subject to the proposed Conditions of
Approval, for the Winchester Pavilion complies with the purpose and intent of the sign standards
of the Development Code, Staff believes the proposed sign program wiil enhance the
development and more fully accomplish adopted sign standards, As a result, staff recommends
approval of the proposed sign program as conditioned.
FINDINGS
Sign Program (Code Section (17.28,080B)
1, The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually
related to:
a. All of the signs included in the sign program, This shall be accomplished by
incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style.
colors, illumination sign type, or sign shape;
b, The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors,
or design motifs included in the building being identified; and,
c, Surrounding Development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or
obscuring adjacent approved signs;
The proposed sign program will enhance the development, is in harmony with and
visually relates to all the signs included in the sign program by incorporating common
design elements such as materials and illumination into the program. The sign program
will incorporate similar materials used in the building within the design of the freestanding
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0sn Winchester Pavillion\STAFF REPORT doc
)
tenant identification sign. The proposed sign program will not adversely affect the .
surrounding development and land uses or obscure adjacent approved signs.
2. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes
in building'tenants.
The proposed sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due
to changes in building tenants by specifying that tenants vacating premises shall be
responsible for the removal of their sign within 30 days of vacating the premises. This
includes the removal of the signs, capping electrical wiring, filling all holes and painting
wall surface. No new tenant signage will be approved until the prior signage has been
removed and the area restored.
3. The proposed sign program, as conditioned, satisfies the intent or objectives of the
Development Code and will enhance the development. The proposed program results in
appropriate sign age that compliments the building architecture and aesthetics.
ATTACHMENTS
1. PC Resolution 2005- _ - Blue Page 5
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
2. Proposed Sign Program - Blue Page 6
.
.
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\STAFF REPORT.doc
4
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PC RESOLUTION 2004-
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0S77 Winchester Pavil1ion\STAFF REPORT.doc
5
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA04-0577, TO ADOPT A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN
PROGRAM FOR THE WINCHESTER PAVILION LOCATED ON
WINCHESTER ROAD WEST OF JEFFERSON AVENUE, ALSO
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 909-270-017.
WHEREAS, Sign-A-Rama, filed Planning Application No. PA04-0577, a Comprehensive
Sign Program Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
on August 3, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based
upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 2. Findinos. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.28.080.B of the Temecula Municipal
Code: '
A. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and
visually related to:
1. All of the signs included in the sign program. This shall be accomplished by
incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style,
colors, illumination sign type, or sign shape;
2. All of the signs included in the sign program. This shall be accomplished by
incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style,
colors, illumination sign type, or sign shape;
3. Surrounding Development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or
obscuring adjacent approved signs;
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
t
The proposed sign program will enhance the development, is in harmony with and
visually relates to all the signs included in the sign program by incorporating common .
design elements such as materials and illumination into the program. The sign program
will incorporate similar materials used in the building within the design of the
freestanding tenant identification sign. The proposed sign program will not adversely
affect the surrounding development and land uses or obscure adjacent approved signs.
B. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to
changes in building tenants.
The proposed sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due
to changes in building tenants by specifying that tenants vacating premises shall be
responsible for the removal of their sign within 30 days of vacating the premises. This
includes the removal of the signs, capping electrical wiring, filling all holes and painting
wall surface. No new tenant signage will be approved until the prior signage has been
removed and the area restored.
C. The proposed sign program, as conditioned, satisfies the intent or objectives of
the Development Code and will enhance the development. The proposed program results in
apwopriate signage that compliments the building architecture and aesthetics.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. This project is exempt from review under
CEQA, pursuant to Section 15311 (Class 11 Categorical Exemption - Accessory Structures) of
the CEQA Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby .
conditionally approves the Comprehensive Sign Program Application, as set forth on attached
Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all
necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 3rd day of August 2005.
David Mathewson, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
.
R\Sicrns\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
, . 2
.
.
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of August 2005, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
3
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester P:lvillion\I'C RESO & COA'S.doc
4
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA04-0577
Project Description: A Comprehensive Sign Program for Winchester
Pavilion commercial building located on Winchester
Road west of Jefferson Avenue.
TUMF NIA
DIF Category: N/A
MSHCP Category: NIA
Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 909-270-017
Approval Date: August 3, 2005
Expiration Date: August 3, 2007
WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Pianning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Cierk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\PC RESO & COA'S.uoc
5
.
.
.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
R:\Siglls\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\PC RESO & COA'S_doc
6
.
.
.
Planning Department
2.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
4.
The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty day prior to
expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions
of time, one year at a time.
5. The erection of signs on the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit
"D" (Sign Program), contained on file with the Planning Department.
6. Landscaping installed around freestanding monument signs shall be continuously
maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined
that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the
authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with
the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall
be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest.
7. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
8. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this sign program.
9. All freestanding monument signs shall be required to incorporate architectural elements
of the center into the design of each sign, including the top and sides, pursuant to
Section 17.28.070 of the Development Code, to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning.
10.
Illumination of all signs shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance No. 655 to
reduce impacts on the Mount Palomar Observatory.
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavilliol1\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
7
.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
.
.
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\PC RESO & CONS. doc
8
. Building Department
11. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Date
Applicant's Signature
Applicant's Printed Name
.
.
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\PC RESO & COA'S.doc
9
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM
R:\Signs\2004\PA04-0577 Winchester Pavillion\STAFF REPORTdoc
6
.
WINCHESTER P A VILLION
41720 WINCHERSTER RD.
TENANT SIGN GUIDELINES AND
. CRITERIA
I
SIGN*A*RAMA.
. 'L#]lj:.:J II...."1:::t:4 'J[1>/~'1l"'~ '.#/ :::t.t~ l::t :.
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction & Tenant Responsibilities - page 3
Application Requirements - page 4
Definitions and Prohibited Signs - page 5 & 6
General Provisions For Sign Construction - page 7
Individual Tenant Wall Mounted Sign Design - page 8
Colors, Typestyles & Monument Sign Design
- page 9
.
.
.
2
.
.
.
INTRODUCTION
This sign program has been prepared for the purpose of establishing and maintaining high
standards of quality and aesthetics throughout the center for the mutual benefit of the
tenants and owner of Winchester PaviIlion. In this spirit we have designed a sign program
to provide a high degree of flexibility while maintaining the greatest amount of
conformity.
For this reason we request that as a tenant you abide by the requirements set forth in this
program. Please review it before making any application for signs so that the process of
your request will go smoothly.
TENANT REPONSIBILITIES
I. Tenant shall be responsible for the following:
a. Obtaining all necessary municipal permits.
b. Sign design for tenant(s) signs.
c. Permit processing costs and application fees.
d. Sign fabrication and installation. .
e. All costs relating to signage maintenance, repair or removal, including repair
of any damage to the building, i.e. patching & painting of building fascia.
f. To maintain the appearance and operating condition of all signs once they
are installed.
g. The fulfillment of all requirements and specifications.
h. Any costs associated with bringing the sign into compliance with this
program or any municipal requirements.
2. Tenant must obtain approval from owner prior to submitting sign plans to the
municipality for permits and/or fabrication or installation of any sign.
3. Tenant must abide by all of the above conditions if mOdifying or replacing any existing
SIgn.
4. Tenant must use a fully licensed and insured Contractor with a State Contractor's
license, a minimum $7,500 contractor's bond, and a minimum of$I,OOO,OOO liability
insurance for all sign installations.
5. Tenant vacating the premises shall be responsible for the removal of their sign. This
must accomplished within 30 days of vacating premises. Responsibility includes removal,
capping electrical wiring, filling all holes and painting to as new condition. No new
tenant signage shall be approved until the previous tenant signage is removed and
building is restored.
3
APPLICATION REOUIREMENTS
.
1. There is a formal process for the creation, review and approval of tenant signage.
Prior to sign fabrication, plans for all proposed signage shall be submitted to the
Owner or Authorized Agent who will review plans for conformance with the sign
guidelines and criteria. All plans submitted for approval must conform to
requirements of the criteria contained herein and the City of Temecula Sign Code
Ordinances. The Owner shall have the discretionary authority to deny approval
for any submittal, which does not comply with the intent or purpose of the sign
guidelines and criteria. Lessee shall submit within thirty days after lease signing.
For signage approval, include 3 sets of the following and submit to:
a. Include with submittal, name, address and phone number of tenant.
b. Name, address and phone number of Sign Contractor, copy of workman's
compo Ins. Certificate, C-45 electric sign contractor's license copy and
copy ofliability insurance certificate for at least $1,000,000.00.
C. Elevation of structure showing all proposed signs indicating sign type,
design, location, size and layout of sign drawn to scale and indicating .
dimensions, attachment devices and construction details, colors, materials
and lighting details.
d. Section detail ofletters and/or sign element showing a dimensional
projection of the face ofletters, method and intensity of illumination.
e. Signs must be approved, installed and finaled prior to date Tenant opens
for business or within thirty days of substantial completion oflandlords
work, whichever is sooner.
.
2. Following approval of proposed signage by the Owner, applications for all
permits for fabrication and installation by Sign Contractor may be submitted to
the City of Temecula Planning Department for approval, along with applicable
sign permit applications to Building and Safety Department for approval and
permit issuance. Tenant shall provide landlord a copy of signage building permits
within 5 days after completion.
3. Fabrication and installation of all signs shall be performed in accordance with the
standards and specifications outlined in these guidelines and in the final approved
plans and working drawings. Following completion of sign age installation, tenant
shall provide landlord copy of job card showing final city approval within 5 days
of issuance.
.
4
DEFINITIONS
.
Architectural element - Wall, fascia, or other surface defined by returns, corners or
change in material
Indirect Lighting - Lighting which reflects off of the surface being illuminated.
Monument sign - Freestanding sign with a continuous base from the ground
Owner - Individual or organization holding legal title to the property and f or the
owner's agent specifically authorized by the owner to approve sign issues.
Primary tenant sign - Wall sign incorporating business name and f or logos as
approved by owner.
Sign Area - Square feet as defined by the overall height multiplied by the overall
length, less any spaces between words and areas between letter ascending and
descending elements.
Tenant - Businesses occupying lease space on the first or second floor of building #1.
Wall Sign - Sign attached to a wall surface for the purpose of identifying individual
tenants.
.
RESTRICTIONS
Only those sign types specified by Ordinance No. 98-10 or most current sign
ordinance of the City of Temecula and approved in writing by the Owner will be
allowed. The following signs are prohibited:
I. Prohibited Signs
a. Signs other than those required for public safety, information or
interpretive signage, shall be prohibited in any area designated as natural
open space.
b. Exposed junction boxes, transformers, lamps tubing or neon crossovers of
any type.
c. Typical internally-illuminated cabinet sign with acrylic material used for
the entire sign face.
d. Window signs or graphics other than those allowed for in this program.
e. Roof signs or projecting signs.
f. Painted window signs
g. Any other signs not specifically allowed for in this program.
.
2. Nonconforming Signs
The owner may, at its sole discretion, correct, replace or remove any sign that
is installed without written approval and/or that is deemed not to be in conformance
with the plans as submitted and with the Sign Guidelines and Criteria.
5
3. Illegal Signs
.
Any sign that is deemed not to be in conformance with the approved Tenant
Sign Guidelines and Criteria or erected without government approval or permits is
considered an illegal sign. The Owner may, at its sole discretion, correct, replace or
remove any illegal sign.
4. Abandoned Signs
An abandoned sign is that whose use is discontinued because the premises
upon which it is located becomes vacated and unoccupied for a period of more than
90 days or as specified in Section D, Chapter 17.28 of City Code. The Owner may, at
its sole discretion, replace or remove any abandoned sign. Any expense incurred by
Owner for correction or removal of non-conforming signs, illegal signs and
abandoned signs will be the burden of the tenant and tenant will re-imburse owner for
all costs upon receipt of invoice.
.
.
6
GENERAL PROVISIONS
.
I. Signs shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with and complementary to
the overall project and adjacent facades.
2. Only those sign types provided for in the sign program will be allowed
3. Signage that incorporates logos, business identity, and/or images denoting the
type of business shall be encouraged. Logo design and colors to be approved by
the Owner and the City of Temecula.
4. Logo and letter heights, where specified, shall be determined by measuring the
normal capital letter of a type font exclusive of typographic swashes, ascenders
and descenders.
5. Signs shall be without visible means of attachment.
6. All sign fabrication work shall be of excellent quality. All logo images and type
styles shall be accurately reproduced. The Owner reserves the right to reject any
fabrication work deemed to be below standard.
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
1.
2.
. 3.
4.
5.
6.
All formed metal, such as letter forms, shall be fabricated using a minimum
thickness of .040 aluminum.
All signs must bear the U.L. label and the installation must comply with building
and electrical codes.
Depth of illuminated channel letters shall not exceed 5 inches. Neon inside
illuminated channel letters shall be sufficient to make illumination even with no
dull spots or hot spots.
Signs illuminated with neon shall use 30 m.a. transformers. All illumination must
match the exact specifications of the approved shop drawings.
Penetrations into building walls shall be made waterproof. All channel letters
must have drain holes at the bottom ofthe letters.
Finished surfaces of metal shall be free from warping. All sign finishes shall be
free of dust, orange peels, drips and runs and shall have a uniform surface
conforming to the highest standards of the industry.
7. Neon shall be 6500 K. Number of rows of neon tube depends on width ofletter
stroke.
8. In no case shall any manufacturer's label be visible from normal viewing angles.
Except for code.
.
7
TENANTS WALL MOUNTED SIGN CONSTRUCTION
.
Maximum area of signs shall be one square foot of sign area for each sign per lineal
foot of building- footage. Wall signs for tenant occupying second story shall not
cover more than 75% ofthe tenants frontage.
1. Internally illuminated channel letters shall be wall mounted. Internally illuminated
logo boxes are encouraged provided the height of the logo box is no greater than the
height of the largest letter and no wider than the 2 times the height of the largest
letter. In no case will logo modules by themselves be allowed.
2. Maximum letter height within the center is 24" and the minimum letter height shall
be no less than 8". Two rows of copy not to be higher than 36".
3. Maximum sign area for first floor is 24 square feet. Maximum sign area for second
floor is 18 square feet.
4. Maximum sign length for first floor is 18 feet. The maximum sign length for
second story signs is 13.5 feet.
5. Depth of illuminated channel letters shall not exceed 5 inches. Neon inside
illuminated channel letters shall be sufficient to make illumination even with no dull
spots or hot spots.
.
6. External illumination is not permitted unless approved through a sign program.
7. Trim caps will match the color ofthe returns.
8.Each tenant is allowed one wall mounted sign.
ALTERNATIVE WALL MOUNTED SIGNS
1. "Non-illuminated letters shall be 3 inches in depth. Minimum letter
height shall be 8" but no more than 24".
2. Non-illuminated letters shall be made of extruded foam with acrylic
laminated face.
3. Returns are to be painted the same color as the face of the letters or
black.
WINDOW SIGNS
No window signs will be permitted without the approval of the Owner and the City of
Temecula. No sign shall be installed, relocated or maintained so as to prevent free
.
8
.
.
.
access to or egress from any door. No more than 25% of the overall window space
available shall be used for signage.
COLORS
The following guidelines are to be adhered to in selecting colors for signage.
1. Acrylic face colors allowed are blue #2114 or #2648, green #2108, orred #2793.
Any exceptions are subject to design review by Owner and the City of Temecula.
Returns and trim caps are to be Dk. Bronze or White. Colors within each sign should
be harmoniously blended. Any deviation must be approved by the Owner and the City
of Temecula.
2. Sign colors should provide variety and excitement.
TYPESTYLES
The use oflogos and distinctive typestyles is encouraged for all tenant signs. Letters
may consist of upper and lower case letters. Acceptable fonts are Helvetica, Brush
Script or Times New Roman. Any deviation must be approved by the Owner and the
City of Temecula.
MONUMENT SIGN
I. Monument sign will be constructed of aluminum, stone and tile with applied
internally illuminated cabinets. Color and Font styles are to be matched with
the above color and font specifications. Any deviation must be approved by
the Owner and the City of Temecula. The face of the tenant position shall y.
inch thick metal with letters routered out ofthe metal and backed with 3/16"
#2114 Blue acrylic.
2. Maximum structure height shall be 10 feet with a width of 10 feet.
3. Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 64 square feet (8ft x 8ft)
including the name ofthe center.
4. Minimum panel height per tenant shall be 10 inches. The minimum letter
height shall be 5 inches.
5. Minimum letter height for address numbers is 4".
6. Multi tenant identification sign shall include a 200 sq. ft. landscaped area
consisting of flowering perennials, annual plants, or other plants which
provide additional color, They shall be planted and replanted seasonally to
maintain year round color.
9
II: 5:'
a~
(f)~
00
-lw
Wo
IW
(f)W
zZ
-(/)
(f)<t:
$:(f)
~~
oa
(f)ill
,
(jW
~~
. (j
<:ta
;:-f-
Z
II:
:J
f-
Ll.l
a:
II:
W
f-
f-
W
-l
~
:J
Z
~
:J
-l
<t:
---
z
~
~
o
(J)
o
II:
W
Z
~
W
a:
n.
<t:
o
~
a:
'<-,
,
f-
a:
a
n.
n.
:J
(f)
Z
a
W
z
z
a
W
z
W
o
If.
o
:J
>-
a:
o
<t:
f-
a
a
co
(/)
f-
ill
a
a:
f-
o
W
-l
W
a:
a
n.
:J
o
,
e!)
a:
W
~
a:
a
LL
(f)
z
<t:
II:
f-
a
f-
W
a:
$:
a
f-
e!)
i i 1
Iii j
......~ -.........., -"- " \ \
~ '" ~", \
......~ '.......... ~-.. ~"~.'- "'" "\ \
._-----~-_.~,._--_._>=:::,-,,---_.~-~;:.. "'-"' ',--
........_,,~_ "....~~.~ f' ''--,- \',,_ \
'--....~, -".c I ,~_~" .
'..... "1 ,----," .!l \ 1
---,_ Iii .l--~; II i
-t---,- C~ j J..../ :
1'-',,",--1 - :
____n_.__~___. I ~ I --
;{ij :r
lO
\
\
,
,
,
f-
:J
o
z
a
o
:J
a:
I
f-
(f)
(/)
~
><
a
co
a:
Ll.l
~
a:
a
LL
(f)
z
<t:
a:
f-
-l
~
Ll.l
~
o
W
o
Z
:J
a
a:
e!)
I
J
/
r
i
I
.- +
!
I
o
f-
$:
(/)
f-
o
W
z
z
a
o
(f)
o
a:
W
:5
a:
a
u.
(/)
z
<t:
a:
f-
I
,
/
j
I
I
,
:' --+---1/
,. fi
I If
[,
/ .~
I
;
I
,~
1',1
;i
~~t
o
U1
o
U1
U1
Z
(f)
<t:
(/)
U1
-l
a
I
n.
W
U1
S
'<t
'-..
,....
W
o
a:
:J
a
(/)
>-
a:
<{
2
a:
n.
a
f-
f-
:J
o
z
a
o
,
,
!
i
i
j
,
,
f
i
/
i
i . .
'----_.--,----f---
i
I I
!
!
I
I i
!
"'
I
I
I
i
~
...J
...J
~
.
z
a
~
(J
w
r.n
a:
w
!:
w
...J
cr
w
:a:
a:
a
lL
r.n
z
~
a:
I-
w
f-
a
2
w
a:
....I
~
U
rl.
~
.
~.
=e
~
-ok
~.
~
~.
c,s.
.,. .-'~
OF '"
"
a::
~,
0::(' _. '._ '"
. '~,
~ v0}!
'J-,'?-j:"/"
!(.
::e
,
~.
~
~.
(.I)"
o
z
<(
S
W
>
W
0::
o
l-
I-
U
W
'"")
III
::>.
cn<(
@5 o'
cnU
L....i ~ ~ .\:
~ OW il
iIu g:~ J
~ Wo~,
Ill~
O ~U't
'" .f,;
o::::W"
~ ~ ~~ I
~ OZw
U. <(:
a<3 M~
,J ~ ~~ i
O~ f".. ~ ~ ~11'
~ vWlf;
rT"l wa. ~
~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ."'.~.
~ ~ ffi III t1
U 1--1 ~;
:...J~ ~.
-:x: 0 ~?
U W 0:::.:.."
r:fJ b 2: ~i
z <( :;".
,
U
=-oC")
~Q)cn
uo:::l'-
<( "I
u c
=Q)CX)
~Q)O .
U l....-r- l'
<(<.9"1
u .
=Q)CX)
~::J"<:t
uco<O
<( "I
U
=Q)"<:t
~::J-r-
uco-r-
<( "I
..
"
co
u
.-
+-'
CD
>
-
CD
I
,
"
.
'+-
LL
CD
~.LU
"'-
"
.~ ~
" \....I
fO
~ ,. '\
~ '-'
:0
".' ..c
M.
rt~
~CIl
,Clj
!~.'~ <(
~
~~
f~
%~
~~
I~
,l',),j
l
tll
J
~
W
~
Q
~
~
a
s
o
~
~
o
Z
rf:J
o
S
. ....
~
~
~
(j)
~
~
Q
u
U
~
~
cd
<
.L
....-...
~ .
~
W
11.
0
l!:
11.
I-
Z
W
U
<(
-,
c
<(
--- ---1c
<D€
CO:J \!
oU
~E -I' ~
-"'0 I
<) ~ I
mu-
CO.
- of.
'Q)u-
001"-
~ ~
e
_0> D::
e .-
mOO W
e-
~ai ~ Q.
.- E 0
-"":J ., 15 0::
:J e "
:20 2: 11.
:2 2l ~ l-
e t!) Z
m
ita. '7 W
'0> .\ t- O
C'e <:II
en'i:: ~ <t
8~ ...,
\ , C
NO J ,
u:: \ f: \:.- ,
, .<C
.
- \ 'i'1 .
0 f I
. . ,-
. .
" J 0
.' ,
" """".......
.,'
Ii>
I
~
W
11.
~
11.
I-
Z
W
U
<(
-,
C
<(
~.
~
1<:
'l'i:t. .
i
~.
~.
II" .~\
-; I ~i
'- ,
~q;7
..
..
0
I
..
~
II
Z ..
..
:5 CO
~
.......
a.. ~
w ' .
I- Q) .
en -
CO
U
(f)
I
c
m
';
-
ii
~ c
- 0
lQ ...
(,I ..
,- lQ
C. (,I
~.3
.
.
.
.
'4::>UI 9 'l::l 6€~ ~ ,
~'
. I j ~
.
~
I
iI:
~.
, ~
,
, ~.
tIS'
I
'X""\
$ - ~
'" ,
... .2
't. l
~{I
.. C
- 0
U- ._
.-
'''It CO
N (,,)
Q) 0
C)...J
.e C
c en
o .-
l.. tn
U--
Q) B
- .-
.:; Q.
tn~
I
,
,
,
'4::>U16 "l:j 9~1
,
,
,
,
I
'4::>ul €"l:I L~,+-~
I
I
z
o
I-
<(
>
W
....J
W
0:::
o
0:::'
w5>
1-"-
x II
Wfu
--
:1:"-
1-"
0:::Q)
o~
Zw
-
.
.
..;CO
LLCI)
~
00<(
Xc
.0)
-.-
LLUJ
00
-
wu.,
(/) (/) r::r
CD<((/)
::JCDo
o
(/)O::ZC\I
I-I(9W
Z(/)-CD
<(rn(/)
...J'-'OO
ll..ZZI-
(9~::JW
ZOO(9
-0::0::<(
0::(9<(ll::
~~O~
OOWO
...J...JO::U
U.O::J...J
Z~~
<(0::0
I-
,
~.
~
~
'k
~.
~
c.:s.
~.
:tU"'\
;I ~
~. I
-<' -
~ >
~. 'Ii
~._./
.
.
.,.
.l::1 0 ~
.
I 1 '-6" I
, ,
r-----~-1
I I
, I
J. i
I !
I .
: I
I ,
I
I
I
.
.
END VIEVV
.
),Ot-\1<A*RA41
((,,', ': -1.SIGN*A*RAMA.
t......, ":" I '///7~ .
"""""0""00'"'01'" I 'I'l'}:1II ;II} If 1I..:j =t:A" [.;::f,f.:j [<1.'Ir.; =tii' =t :/1