HomeMy WebLinkAbout081705 PC Agenda
eg
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
August 17, 2005 - 6:30 P.M.
********
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 2005-057
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Commissioner Chiniaeff
Roll Call:
Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, Telesio and Mathewson
e
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary Drior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
Minutes
1
e
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of August 3, 2005
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\200S\08-17 -oS.doc
2 Director's Hearinq Case UDdate
.
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for July 2005
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Presentation from Robert Johnson, Riverside County Planning Director
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an
appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15
calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the
appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the
appropriate filing fee.
.
Continued from July 20, 2005
3 Planninq ADDlication No. PA05-0100, a DeveloDment Plan, submitted bv Peter Mieqar, to
construct a one-story office buildinq totalinq 12.411 square feel. located on the southwest
corner of Madison Avenue and Bueckinq, Christine Damko, Associate Planner.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Wednesday, Septe'mber 7, 2005, 6:30 PM, Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
.
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2005\08-17-oS.doc
2
.
.
ITEM #1
.
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 3, 2005
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:30 P.M., on
Wednesday, August 3, 2005, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Mathewson led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Chiniaeff, Harter, and Chairman Mathewson
Absent:
Guerriero.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 20, 2005.
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of
Commissioner Guerriero who was absenl.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
New Items
2 Planninq ADDlication No. PA05-0053, a DeveloDment Plan. submitted bv Scott Barone of
Edqe, to construct two industrial buildinqs and one office buildinq totalinq 116.496 square
feel. located on the northwest corner of Reminqton Avenue and Diaz Road
R:\MinutesPCI08030S
Associate Planner Peters presented the Commission with a staff report (of written record).
.
. That staff would request to add a Condition of Approval imposing: that Native American
monitors shall be present during earthmoving activities and that the applicant shall
contact the Pechanga Tribe before any grading to schedule the monitoring.
For the Planning Commission, Associate Planner Peters relayed that the timing between Phase
I and Phase II would be minimal and that the applicant is currently in for concurrent processing
for plan check.
At this time, the public hearing was opened and due to no speakers, it was closed.
Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that the applicant would be in agreement with the added
Condition of Approval.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the
added Condition of Approval. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote
reflected approval with the exceDtion of Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
3 Planninq ADDlication Development No. PA04-0577, a ComDrehensive Siqn Proqram,
submitted bv Paul Gupta of Bianca ProDerties,' for the Winchester Pavilion located on
Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue, located on Winchester Road west of Jefferson
Avenue
Assistant Planner Bales presented a staff report (of record).
.
. That staff recently became aware that the applicant would propose to modify the design
of the monument sign in relation to the stone accents and that staff has not had the
opportunity to discuss the request for modification with the applicant.
Chairman Mathewson directed staff to strengthen the language regarding monument signs to
ensure that one monument sign be installed.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Paul Gupta, applicant for the proposed project, spoke in favor of the proposed project,
advising that the main building would have stone at the base two-feet high up to the window sill
and that it would be the opinion of the applicant that the monument sign, at full height of the
stone may not be compatible with the building. Mr. Gupta noted that he would prefer to have
stone half the height of the monument sign and that the top part of the monument sign would be
made of stucco, advising that the colors would be consistent with the color of the building.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the
condition that the language of the monument sign be strengthen as requested by Chairman
Mathewson; that if the monument sign were built at 10 x 10, that the bottom 4 feet be made of
the ledge stone with the remainder of the sign to match the building: and that if the monument .
sign were to be made smaller, that the base be dependent on the size of the sign.
R:\MinutesPC\08030S
2
.
.
.
Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exceDtion of Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT
A. Commissioner Telesio advised the Planning Commission and staff that he spoke with
the post Master regarding the newspapers stands on the sidewalk at Rancho California
Road and Margarita Road, and was advised that the sidewalk would be the City's right-
of-way and that the City would have the ability to enforce the encroachment right-of-way.
Commissioner Telesio also requested that staff explore the possibility of relocating the
newspaper stands.
B. Commissioner Chiniaeff directed staff to ensure that the owners of Palm Plaza maintain
its landscaping.
C. Chairman Mathewson expressed concern with the amount of dirt left on the street on
Rancho California Road being created by the dirt hauling project. and requested that the
street be swept by the street sweeper.
In response to Chairman Mathewson's concern, Director of Public Works Parks advised that the
problem has been addressed,
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director of Planning Ubnoske advised the Planning Commission that a new Mazda dealership
will be coming to the City and requested two Commissioners for an ad-hoc committee.
, In response to Planning Director Ubnoske's request, Chairman Mathewson and Commissioner
Ghiniaeff volunteered to be a part of the ad-hoc committee for the Mazda dealership.
Principal Planner Hazen relayed that the property owner of Rainbow Canyon requested minor
color modifications and that staff would be willing to work with the applicant to approve the
colors administratively.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to allow staff to work with the property owner
of Rainbow Canyon to approve a minor color modification to be approved administratively.
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:55 P.M., Chairman Mathewson formally adjourned this meeting to the next reaular
meetina to be held on Wednesday. Auaust 17. 2005 at 6:30 P.M., in the City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Dave Mathewson
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
R:IMinutesPCI08030S
3
.
.
ITEM #2
.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
DATE:
August 17,2005
SUBJECT:
Director's Hearing Case Update '
Planning Director's Agenda items for July 2005.
July 14, 2005
PA05-0086 A Development Plan application for Russell Rumansoff, APPROVED
a proposed 6,806 square foot auto Herron and
service building, located at the Rumonsoff
southwest corner of Commerce Architects
Center Drive and Via Montezuma.
.
Attachment:
1. Action Agenda - Blue Page 2
.
R:\DIRHEAR\MEM0\2005l7-2005.doc
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
ACTION AGENDA
R:\DIRHEAR\MEM0\2005\7 -2005,doc
2
.
.
.
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 14, 20051:30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Stephen Brown, Principal Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a
white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Director of Planning may file an appeal of
the Director's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of
written n'otice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department's
application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
Item No.1
1 :30 PM
Project Information
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
P A05-0086
Development Plan
Auto Service Center
Russell Rumansoff, Herron and Rumansoff Architects
A Development Plan application for a proposed 6,806 square
foot auto service building.
Southwest corner of Commerce, Center Drive and Via
Montezuma
Categorically exempt per CEQA Section 15332, In-fill project
Christine Damko
APPROVED
Location:
Environmental Action:
Project Planner:
ACTION:
R:\DIRHEAR\Agendas\2005\07-14"'()5 Action Agenda.doc
.
.
ITEM #3
.
.
.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Christine Damko, Associate Planner
August 17, 2005
Madison Lot 13, PA 05-0100
BACKGROUND
On July 20, 2005 the Planning Commission took public testimony and considered a proposed
Development Plan to construct a one-story office building totaling 12,411 square feet located on
the southwest corner of Madison Avenue and Buecking Avenue. The Commission commented
on the lack of emphasis on the cornice and main entryways. The application was subsequently
continued to the August 17, 2005 Planning Commission Hearing for building redesign.
Architectural Chanqes
The applicant has addressed Planning Commission concerns by: adding a cornice to the
building measuring twenty-four inches tall and twelve inches' wide, enhancing the main
entryways by providing a smooth slate tile extending out four feet from the doorway and
reaching over twelve feet in height, new, deeper recessed window mullions to add architectural
interest, and decorative light fixtures to enhance the sleek appearance of the building.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been
deemed to be Categorically Exempt from further environmental review per Section 15332, In-Fill
Development Projects.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development
Plan (PA 05-0100), based upon the findings and with the attached conditions of approval.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Revised plans
2.
Staff Report from the July 20, 2005 Planning Commission Hearing
G:lPlanning\200SIPAOS-0100 Madison Lot 13-DPlPlanning1MEMO to PC.doc
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
REVISED PLANS
G:\Planning\200S\PAOS-0100 Madison Lot 13-DPIPlanning\MEMO 10 PC.doc
~~ dO. ,
'" i5~ ~e,~.
~ ~~ ~ ~~ g ~ . 0(
d z5~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ gg5 ~~
~~g~~~~<< ~~~ ~~~Q~g<~~ U
:~gt;~~;J;!~~~"$ abi:;~~~~ ~ - ~
~~~~~~~=~~!~~ ~~~"~50~~
~,...o :i",5~~~.!1i1~ g~~J;!~ul:!l:;l'; ,1'\",.
~~t~~~~~~8~:~~~~~;:l';i~~
~i!'-8a~~6ooo ~ oali.'~~.3 = .
.~il """ -"""" < ,gc.,;> J
---------i~------
ii';;~ ------h_h_______h____l_ 0
~~n~ "I .~ -----r---
~ 215 . us
g; ~. ~~
.
,
o
~ I
:: ::.
~
i;!~
",,~i
"'sf-- ___~ ~
.-.!~G "i'<!Ui' - i
....!':~~~~~:']~ 8~
'?~"'~8~%'2. 5~E
f:H~~~~::~ ~l7;(j;
~g~~~g~;; ;~~"
~
~
,
z
"
<:> ~ ~
',' .::~~
tl:>:i
g~~
ggg ~
~~~ ~<o
-E:., 0-
tll"'''' "'0
8t'i~ ':3>-
~~a :~~
........::l~"'~~~J.::
,
z
o
>
"
,
"
~u
< "
'<!~
> .
~~
. 3nN:3^'v' -NOSIOVr-.j":-----:----
,
~
?
.
Ii
!:!
I"..u.
~;
~~
~o
.
"5\
z'
'$\
"",
0\
z.
6\ "'
uJ' "- '"
5\ \, g"
.
~",u"
g;
~2
l
.
.
I
.:~,,~,
gi~a:~
",~g:ilS?l:J
~:jj~5~!;
':,;""'<>'NII'
~I~i"
:.;"- ~
n
!l
~"'i
0"
~g
,"
~
3
~
u
z
2i
~
~
ri
I
, '
II' ,\
! '
I
o
z
~
~
l~~~'
~ ::1
~ ;;1
i IIIII :01
I~
,tl,l
.;ur
fji!!
.,1;1
"'ll!
I1JI
~ ~!~~~
~ ~~'":.1.:
~ g:~~:;~
~ ~~jr;
! ~..
i
.
,
Lu
<
I ;j ~
u"
:::,;,;
~ i ::?~
~2 g~ <:
~~
('t) oq:
'""' Q::
f- a
0
-I U}
<: I-
0 t)
U) Lu
-....
Cl I-
~ -
:r::
U) t)
~ Q::
oq:
~j
~~
g'~
,
.
z
~
u
~
~~
!~ ~.lll!il
~ -~,!jl:i .
; II~ :! ~Ii!l
~
~
t,{ t:3~:;!~'i'
~ . ~ i;;~i
I. ~ ..l~-
i ~U!3
'"
g
~
~
I
III I
I" I
i III I I
Ill! II d
; IInll,
G<::B3080
~
i:::
~
III
...
.,
ili
.
,
~
.
.
~ lLJ
". ~
~t
-.
~~ ~
~ '<(
"'"" ct:
t- e
0
-J (J)
~ I
~ ~ ....
. (.)
,
i ~ lLJ
Q ....
~ -
::t .
CJ) (.)
~ ct:
'<(
. ~
~ ~ ~
. ; 1<~
> ~ " i, ~"~!
8. . ," ~~ ,
~~ g ~~ ,~=;-
N~~~ .. ...!!;-.
. :-~~: ~ ~~;i
. ~g;~
. ;::}~~~
~
<
,
I..lJ
" ". ~
l'Jl
~ . ~~
. e <:
II h , I:;; 1i<~ $:;;
~ *~~! ""
I --.:ij- ("t) ":t::
, ~~ . I:;;~-'
. ~ ~g;~ ""' 0:::
. ,,,~
I- a
()
-....J CI)
~ t--
()
~ I..lJ
. ~ t--
~ -
::r::
. . Ii
I I ,1 CI) ()
,
I ~ 0:::
":t::
.
I"
I'
;!
iI!
I"
"Ii
!~
h
g~
~:;;
~~
."
,"
;;*
"
~g:
..
,;
" 0
'; g~l?
I,! !i:l!
IlIK ~;nJ!
Iii !IIll
n
"
r--___n__..,
.
. "
, ~
:s 5
.
!
.
; >-~
~,J~ ..
,~5-
l!;a- .
o"a
:J~'il<
"
;; .
i. ~ ; .~
~~ 3 ~~~s
.. 'i~-
:l\'S-'
~ ! 0";'
~,,~
~1~~JI
i 1i~I~li
1tJ!1
II'!!
l,hl
.:1'1
I'l
o
it
.~
~
n :'
.~ i.' i
~~ ::~
z
:'i
a.
'"
o
o
~
~
.<\../
'0,
'L
'0
",
~p
m
: S :
i ^ i
.YJ.__
'''' ,
i 5 i
"-..2....
( l00J~Jd_V/lld01'>
:.:: :
i 3 i
'-L...:
'0,
"L
c__ nu____~
r- _u: "<"<,,__~
: '" ,
i 3 :
l....Li
~o
e
$
~
~~
~~/~
'0
:~
~~
:~~
'0,
"
l::;:; ;
;1
i
i",
L~..J
'0
",
~.o,.
-0, . '" .
../ :w!
:x:
L~.j
IOOJllld..V/IJdOlS >
I::;:; i
i", i
LU
lOOJ ~Jd_v/l JdOlS >
: 8" :
:" :
:<.> :
L".__
'0.
",
: 8 :
:'"
iLl
'o~<"<"
-,
r-----:~-,
z
:'i
--: a..
, ~
:0
'0
J OC
: <> ,
i is i
Ui:.--J
'0
\><"
I
~
;:
~
!
.
.~~~: II!I
~ ill!. ~o; ,flHI!
.-. 0;1 II:l .
~ "'<> J i!P I
~ I~ :! -J!ll
z
o
<=
"
w
'"
'"
z
"
~
5
'"
!,~'
~ ..
3 -
o .
,
~
<
<
Co
a~
~~
:~
C")
~
I-
o
-.I
<:
o
Cf)
-.
Cl
~
Cf)
~
~L~
~~ ~;
f;;: ;g
~~ ;2
Lu
~
<
"C
ct:
()
Cf)
h
(..)
Lu
h
--
::t::
(..)
ct:
"C
.
.
8 i
~
~-, .-.-"., - 0-'0
)........_..,""~'''lm'.
~N'Ntl'f"ld S]UIlIJYJ .tlDI1.")~:>)~
lIoz1 ~."a" ","U'OI',o:>
]HI'lQ]lIH:)ij\f ]dV:>SON'fl
dOOlJO \Ill8W\fIITV
~1Q1iW'-'="'J.MXI___n~___""
_-.:)V'"rC;lIoaL~IWH;I:;I~-.a
00
>' :>
""""","SSrl """"
CllOl NOSICTv11 ssn 'J.:a"OIld
. ,
I il Ii
, 1~!
li!l!1
dJ;t
\ii!l!
"",..0.1;'
\ "'
\ "r ...J
'" w
\\ 0 () "
~ n:: ~
<f) <( w
n. u
oJ <r
~\ z <
0 Q
".
~\
\
\
\ 2
, ~
\
\ !
,
\
\
.
'"
I,
j,
9" l'
~, "I'
'"
; ~ ~
:'::'::'::'
:i lii It Ii
nH
i---
lilt:::..
i i g ~
" "!.
:!l~~2
~ ,i!
~ ih
g I lilt
~ ,IH
m .. ~ ~
1--------------------------------------------------------
. 3rtB\V NOSICI't'rt
.
Ii"
, '.
! fl I ~
<ill! ~
II >, ~ .
" ,
P&11!i
!Hi !I&;
In
~ li,III'!i
.:r ,t ~ ~
.: ~ ., ~
~1 8.J
~-5 ~ '0
.A\ ~,
~i,
~H
:'77
,-- ~
!II
, .
- .. I
ill
~.n: ,
m " HI! I
i II ,
Iii .. ........ ,
. ~~ !H! ,
.
i --- ~ ~!HBa . 1
,
ii3~ 3353333 ; I
. ~~~~ -....-....... . "
;
Ii! ,_ III ! '
I I~B ;1.L~il ' !
i !I!! "mil I i
I I '
~ Ii' ii j
"L 1 ,f I i.
IiI' , "' h ,
I ,,~ 5 L~..i~1 ~ 0
< 1'1' f';'P' ! .
i illJ liJ!iH I ~
li:l;jl~:;:;;~i:il
f 00 . 0 0 . f III
00 @. e
.
,
o
o
z
<(
...J
lL
01
z,
F I'
,z
<(,
...J,
lL.
>-1
a:i
<(,
z.
-!
~.
:Jj
ll:!1
lL,
I
I
.
i
1
I
I
I
.
;
,
i
.
.
I
.
!
I
,
.
1
i
I
I
I
i
,
I
I
,
I
I
.
I
I
I
.
,
I
i
I
.
,
!
.
1
!
I
i
!
,
I
,
.
!
I
i
.
j
!
I
.
~
i 1~i
! ~ ~pt
~ S l h:~
!~ i~ ~ 5~~~
fE3~ll.. 5 :~;;
.l"7:::~ .,::la~..ii
~ .,,5'0""1 '.
~~;g~~;;(~i:!" I"
<;~!e~~~~~~~ ~ I
<-~',. ~
s t
\ ,
,~
io
-"
~ ,.
~I- 1
;-,
g i
is ..
<
~j . i! Ill:
EI ...
I
--=
S !
/; !
~ ,I
"'i" ....;
g sl '" i ~ !
~ I; ~ 5'; 13-
5..... ~ ! t:::
..... ~ Sji.~ l!;'t~:O
21>t; t: :~~!' O~!..
e; ~~. ::;V-' ~ 05'
~~~ 5i:S~a_~
u
!!H!!!! I
~!U~~aA I
n ~ni
..~ II ..
i 'I
~ l::~H)~~1'
\
do,.
~,
t'
It i 1;:
,-
1\::
1,1
. '
, '
,
! ,
~; ;!
. 0 ·
,. ,
.;n,.
~ '" ~ j ~ ~
: t: h ~ II ~
~ as.. ~ ~
:1'HII
! I Il:' ~ I f ~
" "i- ~ ,
., . I -.
It. ..
::.1 ,I,
Iliii~~~
'1'1""
<> Ij tl ~ i 1I
-@6€leee e
.
~e
f
o
.'
f It
. .
Ii
"
I:
, '
0'
"X
m
~~~
,
II '\
-X
i1:'"
~. <
." J
,~~
,
>
---
,; ,
..
~
.
-
J J ~
.n
I
!: Ji:
, '!
,I. !
o 10 e
-' .
"'~ t Z
= ~ .
1 .
1
I
. - .
i i . !
I
1 ..1
. ,.
'"
.
~
I
.
~
.
.
~ ! 1
! j i
.
.
.
/
ATTACHMENT NO, 2
STAFF REPORT FROM THE JULY 20, 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
G:IPlanning\200SIPAOS-0100 Madison Lot 1 3-DPIPlanningIMEMO to PC.doc
e
.
.
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date of Meeting:
July 20, 2005
Prepared by:
Christine Oamko
Title: Associate Planner
File Number:
PA05-0100
Application Type: Development Plan
Project Description:
A ,Development Plan to construct a one story office building
totaling 12,411 square feet located on the south west corner of
Madison Avenue and Buecking Avenue (APN: 910-272-013).
i:8J Approve with Conditions
o Deny
Recommendation:
(Check One)
o Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
CEQA:
(Check One)
I:8i Categorically Exempt
(Class) 15332
o Negative Declaration
o Mitigated Negative Oeclaration with Monitoring Plan
OEIR
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template.doc
1
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
.
Applicant:
Peter Minegar
Completion Date:
April 6, 2005
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
July 20, 2005
General Plan Designation:
Service Commercial (SC)
Zoning Designation:
,Service Commercial (SC)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant lot
Vacant loVexisting commercial building
Vacant lot
Existing commercial building
Vacant lot
Lot Area:
1.13 acres
Building Summary:
Proposed 12,411 square foot building
.
Building Height:
22 feet
Total Floor Area/Ratio: .26
Landscape Area/Coverage: 13,969 square feet / 28%
Parking Required/Provided: 52 required / 52 provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
[8] 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
A Pre-Application was submitted on January 3, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on February 10,
2005 to discuss site, landscaping, architecture, and other departmental issues. On April 6, 2005,
a formal Development Plan application was submitted. On May 12, 2005, a second DRC
meeting was held with the applicant. A DRC letter was mailed on May 17, 2005 and the
applicant resubmitted on June 1, 2005.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project conforms to the development regulations of the Service Commercial (SC) zoning .
district. The building setbacks meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code and
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template.doc
2 "
.
.
.
the 0.26 Floor Area Ratio is below the target ratio of 0.40 for this zoning district. The building
footprint includes varied setbacks from 5 to 12 feet, which reduce the mass of the building and
add architectural interest.
Architecture
The proposed building is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines and is
compatible with other adjacent buildings within the vicinity, The building is constructed of
concrete tilt-up painted a smooth finis and is located towards the corner of Buecking Avenue and
Madison Avenue, while the associated parking is located behind the structure, adding interest to
the streetscape on both roads. A patio with a covered trellis located on the east side of the
building adds to the architectural interest of the building as well as providing a shaded common
area for employees and customers. Metal awnings extend out three feet from each individual
entry and slate tiles are placed above and below the awnings for additional'emphasis. Twelve
inch pop-outs around the building add interest and break up the mass of the building. The
building has rooflines varying from 19 to 22 feet in height, with a decorative metal cornice to tie
in with the sleek, modern architecture.
LandscaDinq
I
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and
Design Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen onsite parking
areas and effectively soften building elevations. The project proposes to landscape 13,969
square feet or 28 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum 20 percent landscaping
requirement in the SC (Service Commercial) zone. The project provides landscaping around the
perimeter of the site, with landscape setbacks ranging from 13 to 25 feet along Buecking Avenue
and Madison Avenue. The project also proposes varied landscape setbacks around the building
footprint.
Access and Circulation
The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact for the project and has
determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the
previously approved City of Temecula General Plan EIR. The Fire Department also reviewed
the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency
services to the site. The proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles anticipated
to utilize the site, as well as emergency vehicles. One loading space is provided along the south
side of the building, thereby meeting the loading space requirement of Section 17.24.060 of the
Development Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
~ 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review per Section
15332, In-Fill Development Projects.
G:\P]anning\2005\PA05~0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template.doc
3
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
.
Staff' has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Development plan with the attached
conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan(17.05.01OF)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Service
Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan
has listed the proposed uses, including discount retail stores, offices, light manufacturing
uses, and auto service and repair as typical uses in the Service Commercial designation.
The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations outlined conditioned by the
Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to comply with all applicable Building
and Fire Codes.
2.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Industrial Development Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in
regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 5
2. PC Resolution No. 2005-_ - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\pC STAFF REPORT template.doc
4
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison LoI 13-DF\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template.doc
5
.
.1
I
I
j
!
i
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
.1
I
I
~
I
" ~
. "
rn "
~:i~
aU
~~~ ~::
g~[j ~';f<i>
5~~~i~33i
~~o~U;;~~~
J::I~jggt;!
;;;gg&:l\ii;:;~'*"~
.
Ii .
~
~
"
o
j
,
;;;0" ~
- ~
~~~
@~E
~
6
:3 [
gi~
E:i:<i
uao
.,-
ffig8 ~~
~~~ ~g
;~~ g~
8~~ ,~
;:>:.!~ "'~~
~~~(!l ~~~N
."n..."'~'"
.
"
<
,
,
z
u
>
l/;tolj;
>
e
,
~~~
~~:i
,;
~
~
~~
", i;~ ~~ 0
5 ~~ ~ g~ g ~
~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~o ggj
u",a~w",w ~ Wwu ~QZO~u~~u
~~i~~3~~OW~~[ ~b~~~~~g~
~~5*j~~~~~~g~ ~~~~d~~~5
g~~~~~~~~~~~~og~~~~8~~;
~~:i~~~~:i~8~~~.~:~8~~o~5~
~~o5~~~~~~ ~ O~w~"'I
~"'~NO~gggg ~ ~g~~~~
~~ I
· ' ,i tllll
~ gl,h!!
4Il.. "I ;11'1
I~ '-'<:oj ~ll
j 1'111 :! "1111
~~;
rn -
.
c
z
O.
F.
~
"
I~"
> 0
Z
W Z
~u
ON
<
~. ~ ~~
F' ~~
~
" ii
(j3~
---------:lli------- J
m;; -------------------------ll--t---
~~ ~~
--------:JnN:3AV -NOSIGVVi- --!!-_____~-_-1"
~ ---f
~ ,~
~"
I
n
n
B~
~:5
?
.
.
I
,
\
\
,
\
,
\ "
.
, \
. ,
\ ..o-Sl
--"""
I
I
I
lR
II ,.
. ' !i'~
, '0
,0
~r;o, "
c..c;
Oz
~~
~
i.I'I
W
0""
-4-"l
I
N~
~2
'N
H
~~
.
I
I
8
( INO
... 5'"
~~ ~ g
~' ,~~
,e
!~
~
( (
e"."O, .~
.",~o> -
~,. t;"~ ~
~~~g~~ ~:
E"~>5 .
"-;:;><~~ ~~
~~:g~o
~,o~
"
l~'~
~~h ~;)
<;i""l'\~ h
~."' " Co
zC2O/!" "-~ ui"
~!i ~~ ~~
,g .
~
!
]g ~
::J~~~~
f5 ~~~1~
g ~Q .",-
~ g:~f:g
s ~~!~~
~ ~"
"
<
,
o
.
".
~l
~~
~::>
""
lJ.J
(!)
<:
~
0:::
a
C't)
'\"0-
l-
e
-J
CJ)
I-
CJ
lJ.J
I-
~
~
~
CI)
~
-
:t:
CJ
0:::
~
I
I
I
1
I
I
!' I
i i I
In I
~ ~ ~ i '
I il i , ! I
! II · ,
! lHP,d
I ii" I
~ I ~ i ~ r
!
!~
~~
.~
. .;-~
~ \ 1I11
,
~ tI!f
i l!~'l
11"1.
I II"
. ~ I It
I "II'/
I 'IIi
,
.
l
1~-
.
~ ~
~ ;.
t "'
u", :i
t1~~,:1; :
~ ~~j1::
~ ~~f~g
~ ~~~;2
~
r- ...
j
i :.
,
i
i
1
I
,
~
.
t LI.J
~
l:q
~~ <
~>
"
CI') ~
~ 0::
I- 0
a
......J lJ)
<: ......
l~ CJ
~:..--._-- a
. CI) LI.J
~ - ......
. Cl .
~ ~ -
.
~ :t:
CI) CJ
~ 0::
~
.
I ,
I
j......t
I I ' I
I ! I
I t---;. I
I I
! ' I
I i
I I
1 I
I I
!
I
i i I
I , I i
i "
, I
I I ,
i
!
I
!
-!-------
i
. 1
1
,
i! -'
;i.!
I
,
! v_.~~-
.,..-1.,--,--",;
! +-.f:.>~~}/. ~
I "-' v
~-=F~:L.
't
i i
~ln:
i
r '?f
I '
, I
'; .
Ii I' i
i Ii
, ! I!
.
!,
I' !!
I !I ~~;~
II! il! II:;!
, - !.
IIi !Ii di~/i!
I Illll
,
\ l
\
" \
, \
......' \
~! , ,
I '
I ' .......
,I
~
i~ ~ ; l<B
~~ ~ 2~~~
r! ~m
i!
, 2
h ~ : ~~-
~!1 ~ ";::"S
o ~ ~m
~,
5!~
!~
o
"
~
~ ~
"~;' ,0 ,.-
; ~~~~
z-. ",':l;::'i-
g ~~-.
~ ~~~i
~
~
g ~
:~ i ~!~~
,
l!
" Ii'
~ ~;
::; :;;.
~ t~ <.;s
i ~I!~
_ ",,-~':;':f.
,
!i
!
!
~g
Ii ~ ~.~"i .i!i!
~g ~ III
~i 'I ~II ~~; !,i,U
g[ !il II ~ ill
.e
o
--------l
I
--Jd
, 1
~
! :
i i
-4-...1
! I
i
I
: -+-!
, I"
I ,I
~.j
i 'r-'
I 'I
I
~~:
. '
.
'"~~ ~
eJ ~i:~~
2:;li.'E'-""'
g :i8.'i~~
~ ~~ ~:e.
",::::EO:;'"
i ::r",~ec:'
5
~
'"
o
o
~
~
~
.
,
ltJ
~
<:
~
a::
a
I', ,
i ,~-
i :i! '
! ," ,
I:' Ij :
], i! l:.;
'--""-----l'+r, ) III !
, . -". '
_~=:J_+!~~...:=-____jl1~f~~~~~~ 1t~ ----i..-
H' I I l ' 1-'.' A" I'
1 __ /.j! j-", - ,lc.,---L- It 'f"+=f=- i
"A"r-~-~---~..-J- / I / j- ,,/--"'t!
! ..r /,--+- I
/ I i - -4-
, / '
i ;'
; r
i
!
.
'.
~~
~~
C't)
~
I-
a
-.I
CJ)
I--
()
ltJ
I--
<:
a
CI)
-
Q
~
CI)
~
-.
::r:
()
a::
~
.,
~d"~
-a,:i
'1
.,
~<I',.
NOllJ-
mirl8
fTl
lL
~ ~ fd!l
<;
I ,,'
! It;l!
II:'
I !'''!
i
t I .'1'1 .
. 1 I,ll
~
. t .,
;~ ~,\ll R
~ . 1:l~*~ J,
~ ~Ej~~
5 . g ~31~~
~ :::",~:,:e.
., : ".R ~"x
f5 ::>f:<..e.~
r--- _:'1 __., ~
, '''>", I
iel
i ~ i
l~--.J
'sj
15 i
L~J
/f'-
5
,
~
~~
.~/~
"-
."
".
~.Y/'3<101S
'.~....
-"',. 'P,.
.
i 8 i
\ 8 i,
L~
'0.;'
.~
Cn_ ________~
'0,
'.
i-.il
'< ,
~j
v
."
".
."
---------?--:
1O(;Jij3<l.e/l300lS )
~
.,,~~
'"'
!'" i
LtJ
i; !
,<-> ,
~-j
iOOlliJd,9/lJdcnS )
i ~ \
LiJ
'0"
'c
00;",.-
~I
"
~
~
fs-j
,<..> ,
~j
'cc
~
~
Q.
~
o
o
DO
_WJ3
'(Jl[fl!l
.
II
z
o
ti
w
<J>
'"
Z
o
~
5
ro
~
, l1J
.
;~ ~
~~ <:
~'"
""
CV) '<(
~ Cl:::
I- a
a
...,J CJ)
6 I-
(j
CI) l1J
- I-
C) .
~ ""-
::t
CI) (j
~ Cl:::
'<(
'~
g
g
I
,
~
I
!
~
-}r~)
""I
";'-~.:-:;--' .0..":<1-
...~,
.
.
.
~
.
-r-----
I
I
i
,
I
, , I
I T ~
\ li!!i
\!j!i!
,
\
\
~\
~,
!i!\
",
~\
\
\
\
~IBSoI<I.O'\l'JH(X)llIll__($llll(f'.t___H.l ciei
>>
.(lIl!;ZlI\l'OY11::9I3l~lBiH3O~SQ;Wl .
NOSICJWt SS>'I ""'" ;:1 .. ci:::
1;;.... z.
-
El .LOl NOSI(J'offl SSI'l ,""""'" H W mO
~.fi ~ _0
~ o ~
Z
:)
I i ~ D...
'I' Cl
i I 1"'1' i ,! I ! z
illl ! > F
, " ". Z
H! 11i:1 ill @ :l <(
~,o 'I' 0 ...J
It t::t::t:' i. D...
si l>i:;fs Ii!: !ii ~
"Hi li!!i
': '" ~. ! g!:III!.1 <(
~ . 'l,! ,I, z
Ii; h" .. ~ ::::;
"i ~:ilil;[ ...J
idl! ~;';:!2 W
rc
Ii ~ i 1 ~ D...
-., --.,..~, --'@
:>"""'S.........."..,-.....~,.
QNINWld SJum:Wj NOll'0'3lJ03<!
tIOZ' aSU~:>'1 O!lJJOJ!IO:)
3ClIl.1~3JJHOHV 3d'9':lsaNVl
dI1OlJO V!J8I'M-flV
3nN3AV NOSIaW4
,
I
,
,
,
,
--
\
\
,
jiz
","
J.,?
I;
'!
I
i
I
.
I
!
i
! ,
~ ~
Ii: N
'. .
~ ~
H
., ~ ~ ~ i
I iii!
!
l,!,!,!
~i!..:i'..iL.
..............
1111111
i ::: ';' :! ~
,
"
"* ~
.
_ ~ ~ iii ~ a
! ~!!! ~!!~!!! ' ~
S'
~
w
u
no
"
~
~
1 i III f
Ii' I, '
alliil ! I
~ ~ ~
I ,-
,!d
i im
,
, , ~
i I! all j
,d ; ,i 1\ ,
"11 , I"!' ' ,
I II" L!:l" , ,
I Ill"li UIIW!i!
:;: ~,;sh~~d::l
~ ~:~I)--~. -;'>,., ,~
il~;i~~;i;::i;i~:~i
!
; 08 . (') 0 0 f 1/1
I 08 @ 0 e
~
~
~,
"
.'
,
----
Ill!!!!l,
"11!'1I I
!I ~!I i
, -I
I ,
~~
!,
~ t:E!~~~~1:'
,
I
!.
rl'
<
.'
E'
c ) l:5
,\;
I \l
, '
.-
~~~
li..;J
Q!~~
-~
i1N{;
~"'i1
"'~~
I It
"
III
1;1
III
Ii Ii
'1
'/1
, ,
"
/i
II
!i"
~
~. -.'
I ~ lit
~ ~ ~i;;g
;,!< a" !1~1
l!!e~i~ ..~~~
!i!~1l ," ., l'Ilj<
!!l;~ !" '. ~l
I,!"~ < t g ~m,
~ i
~J ! 0
i~! '!!'
~ I, I" 11'
~ '. ~I'!~! ~,l'
"'ii ~ ,:11" 110
Ill.. ~~I'! ,
~"s,n I
!;
"'Ii
>
.
z'
~ ~~
01
~>
it
~
.
.'
E'
.
,
I .
~: ~
'0 "
,. ~
'lli'l
! I ..
i: ~ ~ " 5 e
"1'1 '
H:!dlll
H~jP'
.d,! I! ~
thl!.I'1
'" "I
d",n.
~ l!' ~ ::j ...
Unnn'
.ee~eee 6
o
",
~~
.
.'
E'
.
<i
I:
,
, ,
<,
II :
/
// ------.
,
/~----
~ - -
I .-? ~-::::==
I t/~ /- i/. -
./ J ~;j
,
.
hi
. :;
l!
. !
~
.
!
.
. m
Ii
fa
.
J J I ~
, .
· ': J'
.11 !
~ @ g
~ e, :j
.
I
!
,
I
. ,
, I . 1
, I 8 31
. I i~
!
r ~~
~~
.
,/
"
.
I
"
.
~
.
~
.
s
,
o
.
~
~ i
!
I
.
I!
, ,
, ,
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 2
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2005-_
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template.doc
6
.
.
.
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO, PA05-0100, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A
ONE STORY OFFICE/SHOWROOM BUILDING TOTALING
12,411 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH WEST
CORNER OF MADISON AVENUE AND BUECKING AVENUE
(APN: 910-272-013).
WHEREAS, Peter Minegar filed Planning Application No. PA05-0100 (Development
Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
on July 20, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to and based upon the findings
set forth hereunder:
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal
Code:
A., The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Service Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The
General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including discount retail stores, offices, light
manufacturing uses, and auto service and repair as typical uses in the Service
Commercial designation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations
outlined and conditioned by the Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
I
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of .
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Service Commercial Development Performance
Standards of the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance
standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
Section 3. Environmental ComDliance. The project will have no significant
environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the California Environmental QualityAct Guidelines.
Section 4, Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to construct a one-story office/show room
building totaling 12,411 square feet located on the south west corner of Madison and Buecking
with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed
necessary .
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 20th day of July 2005.
David Mathewson, Chairman-
ATTEST:
.
I Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
2
.
.
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2005- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20lh day of July 2005, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
3
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\PIanning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
4
.
.
.
Planning Application No.: '
Project Description:
DIF Category:
MSHCP Category:
TUMF:
Assessor's Parcel No,:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA05-0100
A Development Plan to construct a one story
service commercial building totaling 12,411
square feet located on the south west corner
of Madison Avenue and Buecking Avenue
(APN: 910-272-013),
TBD at Building Permit Issuance (Speculative
Building)
TBD at Building Permit Issuance (Speculative
Building)
TBD at Building Permit Issuance (Speculative
Building)
910-272-013
July 20, 2005
July 20, 2007
WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required
under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered
to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project
granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c)].
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
5
.
.
.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
6
. Planning Department
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
.
.
3.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval bf this development plan.
(
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
5. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year
extensions of time, one year at a time.
4.
6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan
and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
7. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
8. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being
placed below the surrounding parapet wall.
,9. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site.
10. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all
utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
11.
If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeologicaVcultural
resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of
cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0J 00 Madison Lot 13-DPJ>lanning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
7
,
advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other .
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at
his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems
, reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully
qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the
significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining
that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall
notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until
a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of
Planning.
12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
13. A separate building permit shall be required for.all signage.
14. Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
15.
The condition of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be
deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent
of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to
substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the
regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. '
.
Material
Main Body texture and color
Accent Color
Accent Color
Accents
Awnings
Finish and Color
Frazee Paint #8711W "Misty Mica"
Frazee Paint #8713W "Kindling Wood"
Frazee Paint #8724W 'Wildcat"
Slate Tile
Metal
16. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
Public Works
17.
A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
.
18.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
8
.
.
.
19. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitte,d on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Community Services
20. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
21. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
22. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
23. All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the
property owner or maintenance association.
Fire Department
24. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
25.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-l. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 3 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A)
26. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
,Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-l. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, al.each intersection
and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the' street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
27. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required, (CFC 903.2)
28.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
9
.
.
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
10
. Planning Department
29. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector
check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
.
.
30. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to
not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
31. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department.
32. The applicant shall comply with the proVIsions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
Public Works
33. A copy of the grading, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control .and
Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit.
34.
A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is
required for work within their right-of-way.
35. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
36. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
37. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
38.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards, identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required improvements, shalt be provided by the Developer.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-OlOO Madison Lot 13~DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
tt
39.
40.
41;
NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-
construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-
phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the
City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for
Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction
Activities. Post-c\mstruction measures shall be required of all Priority Development
Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include,
a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs
to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff
year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction
BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the
approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project
proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term
maintenance of all.structural post-construction BMPs.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego. Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
42. A flood mitigatio)1 charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water ConserVation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
12
.
.
.
.
.
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-0IWlanning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
13
.
.
.
Planning Department
43.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
,parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
c. Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans.
d. , One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
f. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
g. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details
the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth
and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The
approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance
contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
44. All utilities and light poles shall be shown and labeled on the landscape plans and
appropriate screening shall be provided. A three-foot (3.0') clear zone shall be provided
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion.
45. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
46. The Planning Director shall approve the Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans.
47. The construction plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International
Orange".
48. Provide a detail of the metal trellis on the construction plans to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director.
49. Provide a detail of the outside furniture proposed for the site on the construction plans to
the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
Building Department
50.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code;
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
14
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled .
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
51. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County
area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this
ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the
time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance
03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance,
52. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
53. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School'
Mitigation Fees.
54. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
55. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
56.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,
1998)
.
57. Second set of disabled parking Places shall be relocated to the southwest side of the
building.
58. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
59. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
60. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
61. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
prior to permit issuance.
62. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
63. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons
with disabilities. '
64.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13~DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
15
.
.
.
65.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the
approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
66. Show all building setbacks on plot plan.
,
67. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
94-25, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
Public Works
68. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a.
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving:
Driveway shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
b.
c.
69. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works. )
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: drive approach,
b. Storm drain facilities
c. Sewer and domestic water systems
70. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
71. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
72. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
Fire Department
73.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot ] 3-DP'\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
16
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather .
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) ,
74. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec 902)
75. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
76. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent.
(CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
77. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
78. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via
all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
79.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
t7
.
.
.
PRIOR TO BUILDING OCCUPANCY
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
18
83. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
84, All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
.
85. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Departmentof Public Works.
Community Services
86. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
Fire Department
87. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
88. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family
residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
89.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
19
90.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10)
.
91. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser door. (CFC 902.4)
92. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
93. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
94.
95.
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article
81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the
developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground
tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other
hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention
Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
\
96. If there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall
submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County
standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information.
The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and
projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau
must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of
this condition.
97. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
98.
The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
20
.
.
.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
,Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. '
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
21