The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About031306 CSC Agenda AGENDA TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION TO BE HELD AT TEMECULA CITY HALL MONDAY, MARCH 13, 2006 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Tom Edwards FLAG SALUTE: Hogan ROLL CALL: Edwards, Fox, Henz, Hogan, Meyler, PUBLIC COMMENTS: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a green "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. For all 'other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Community Services Commission Secretary before the item is addressed by the Commission. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. DIVISION REPORTS R:\CSCAGEND\2006\031306.doc " CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 That the Community Services Commission approve the minutes ofthe February 13, 2006 meeting. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Amendment to the Old Town SDecific Plan 2.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file a report regarding amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan. 3. Universal Waste Reaulations 3.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file a report regarding the Universal Waste. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR'S REPORT COMMISSION REPORT ADJOURNMENT That the Community Services Commission adjourn to the regular meeting on April 11, 2006, 6:00 P.M., atTemecula City Hall Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA. R:\CSCAGEND\2006\031306.doc c CONSENT CALENDAR MINutES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13,2006 . CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Community Services Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Monday, February 13, 2006, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ~LLEGIANCE Commissioner Henz led the audience in the flag salute. ~OLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Fox, Meyler, Henz, Hogan, and Chairman Edwards. Absent: . None. pRESENTATIONS: Honoring Ms. Janet Kitchel for her outstanding efforts with regard to Development Services, Chairman Edwards presented Ms. Kitchel with a plaque of recognition. Thanking Chairman Edwards and staff, Ms. Kitchel noted that it has been a pleasure for her to work in the Community Services Department. PUBLIC COMMENTS: No additional comments. DIVISION REPORTS Maintenance Superintendent Harrington provided a brief overview of items that were addressed by the Maintenance Division since the last Community Services Commission meeting, noting the following: . That the Maintenance Division has completed the installation of the handrails and upgraded the stairway step lighting at the Temecula Community Theater auditorium . That light was installed at the Mary Phillips Senior Center and the Temecula Community Center flagpoles . That a security light was upgraded at the back of the Temecula Community Center . That plant materials were installed throughout many roadway median islands in the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Developments R: CSC/minutesl021306 L . That a failing wrought-iron fence adjacent to the flood control channel was replaced at the Vail Ranch Development . That the walk-way lights were repaired at Vail Ranch Park and Redhawk Park site E and Harveston Lake Park . That the first phase of the Wolf Creek Linear Park was accepted on February 1, 2006. Recreation Superintendent Pelletier provided the Community Services Commission with a brief staff report, noting the following: . That morning lap swim was extended to 5:30 a.m. rather than 6:00 a.m. and has been well received by the public . That on Friday, February 10, 2006, a Family Astronomy Night was held, and was a well received . That the FIT program will begin on March 13, 2006, and will be held at the Ronald Reagan Sports Park as well as Harveston Community Park from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday . That more information regarding the annual volunteer recognition event will be provided at the March 13, 2006, Community Services meeting. Cultural Arts Administrator Betz provided a brief summary of activities in the Cultural Arts Division, noting the following: . That auditions for the Frog Prince will be held on Monday, February 13, 2006, and will be produced by Missoula Children's Theatre . That Mr. Bill Strong was hired as the new Technical Coordinator for the Old Town Temecula Community Theater . That the Antique Radio - The Roger Sannipoli Collection at the History Museum received positive feedback from visitors . That Leverne Parker - History Regional Paintings, will be held at the History Museum opening March 11 through April 30, 2006 . That the Children's Museum has been running at full capacity. In response to Commissioner Meyler's question, Mr. Betz noted that the Missoula Children's Theatre travels throughout the United States to provide special programs with kids from local communities. . Development Services Administrator McCarthy provided the following report: . That the YMCA has submitted its development plans to the City for review process, advising that its new facility will be located in Margarita Park R: CSClminutes021306 2 . That construction will begin on the six-acre neighborhood park. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 That the Community Services Commission approve the minutes of the January 9, 2006 meeting. MOTION: Commissioner Henz moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Meyler seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDroval. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Librarv UDdate 2.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file a report on the progress on the Temecula Public Library Project. Deputy Director Ruse provided the Commission with a brief update of the Temecula Library Project, noting the following: . That construction is progressing well and on schedule . That the foundationlslab and the structural steel have been erected beyond the center point of the building . That the remaining foundation and steel will be poured in the near future . That the curb and plantings have been installed in the parking lot, advising that it would be anticipated to pour the asphalt within the next couple of weeks . That the bids for the Pauba Road improvements (separate project) were opened on January 9, 2006, and that a contract has been awarded and construction would be anticipated to begin within the next 30 to 45 days . That LLSI has begun the purchasing and processing of the opening day collections, and selecting collections will be moved from the existing branch to supplement the new opening day collection: and that RFID tags for radio frequency identification will be included in the process . That the Information Systems Department continues to work on all other technology that will go into the library . That staff has been working with the County, LLSI and architects LPA, to begin the final selection of furnishings for the library . That it would be anticipated to have the construction in the early fall of 2006 with an opening shortly thereafter. R: CSC/minutes021306 3 For Commissioner Hogan, Ms. Ruse noted that those wishing to donate to the library would need to go through the Friends of the Library. Commissioner Henz gave kudos to Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse and staff for their efforts with regard to the new library. It was the consensus of the Community Services Commission to receive and file this report. 3. Patricia H. Birdsall SDOrts Park UDdate 3.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file an update on Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park. Via overheads, Development Services Administrator Mc Carthy provided a brief up date on the Patricia H. Birdsall Sport Park. For Commissioner Henz, Development Services Administrator Mc Carthy relayed that 450 parking spaces will be provided for the Sports Park. It was the consensus of the Community Services Commission to receive and file this report. 4. Doa Park Proiect UDdate . 4.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file a report on the sub- committee's findings on the Dog Park Project. Via overhead, Director of Community Services Parker provided a brief update on the sub- committee's findings on the Dog Park Project. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Nick Shistople, Temecula, relayed his support for the proposed project, but expressed his desire for a larger dog park. At this time, the publiC hearing was opened. For the Commission, Director of Community Services Parker noted that staff could explore the possibility of expanding the proposed dog park. Chairman Edwards noted that Long Canyon Creek Park would have a long and linear space and would make a good candidate for a dog park. MOTION: Commissioner Hogan moved to approve the proposed dog park as presented. Commissioner Henz seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDroval. PEPARTMENTALREPORTS No reports at this time. Mr. Parker distributed a departmental report to the Commission. R: CSC/minutes021306 4 For Commissioner Fox, Mr. Parker noted that the Roripaugh and Johnson Ranch Open Space Agreement would be a working document at this time, but that at the completion, a copy will be forwarded to her. In response to Commissioner Hogan's query regarding Murrieta Creek, Director of Community Services Parker stated that the the Public Works Department has taken the lead on the creek project, but would be of the opinion that the project will be underway some time in the near future. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS For Commissioner Henz, Ms. Carthy noted that the contract for the Redhawk Park upgrades would be nearing completion and will be moving forward. Commissioner Henz expressed concern with CC&R's new guidelines with regard to Household Hazardous Wastes, and requested that the issue of Household Hazardous Wastes be agendized for discussion. Understanding Commissioner Henz's concem, Director of Community Services Parker stated that he will agendize the issue for discussion. ADJOURNMENT At 7:00 p.m., Chairman Edwards adjourned this meeting to the next regular scheduled meeting on Monday, March 13, 2006, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, and Temecula. Tom Edwards, Chairman Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services R: CSC/minutes021306 5 ITEM 2 - CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: Community Services Commission ~ Herman Parker, Director of Community servic~ . March 13, 2006 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission receive and file a report regarding amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan. BACKGROUND: The Temecula City Council originally approved the Old Town Specific Plan on February 18, 1994. Periodically since that time, the Specific Plan has been modified to respond to the every change situation in the Old Town area. Tonight the Planning Director Debbie Ubnoske and Associate Planner Dale West are here to provide you with an overview of proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan. AttaChments: information. Staff Report to the Old Town Local Review Board with pertinent background R:\ZIGLERGIREPORno31306 CSC Old Town Specific Plan.doc STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Old Town Local Review Board FROM: Dale West, Associate Planner DATE: March 13, 2006 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan (PA04-0596) BACKGROUND The City Council originally approved the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) on February 8 1994. Periodically since that time, the Specific Plan has been modified to respond to the ever changing situation in Old Town. ANALYSIS The proposed amendment originates from a number of issues that have come up since the Specific Plan was updated earlier this year. By addressing these issues staff believes that that the OTSP will enable a more appropriate style of development and that the revitalization of Old Town will be improved. The proposed changes are as follows: . Allow '10r profit" museums within the High Density Residential Planning Area . Delete the Conditional Use Permit requirement for mixed use projects, and allow the determination for individual uses within a mixed use project to be based on the use matrix . Require residential uses within mixed use projects to provide on-site parking for each residential unit, or accept an in-lie4 parking fee . Provide flexibility in how private open space is provide for mixed use projects . Expand the historic preservation requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan to four designated historic sites outside of Old Town T emecula and to clarify the requirements for making determinations of historic appropriateness . Incorporate design standards for the remaining alleys in Old Town . Make a number of minor clarifications to the sign provisions, design guidelines and the permitted use matrix Hiah Densilv Residential Plannina Area Staff proposed to amend the regulations for the High Density Residential Planning Area to allow '10r profit" museums within this district of the Old Town Specific Plan. R:IOTSPlPJan AmendmenlsIP A04-0596 Supplemental Clean-upIOTLRBlMemo.doc I Mixed Use Proiect Recuirements At this time the first new mixed use buildings are being proposed within Old Town. As staff has reviewed the applications for conformity with the Specific Plan, staff has identified potential unanticipated consequences. As a result, staff is recommending that the conditional use permit requirement for mixed use projects be removed from the Specific Plan. In doing this, residential uses within a mixed use project will be permitted by right, whereas the determination for non- residential uses will be made based on the Land Use Matrix (Table 111-1), which identifies specific uses as either permitted, conditionally permitted or prohibited in its corresponding columns for Tourist Serving Residential and Tourist Retail Core. The policy that eliminated off-street parking within Old Town in order to stimulate economic development within Old Town has worked as anticipated; however, in the interest of sustaining economic development and vitality of mixed use projects, staff is concerned that this policy could negatively affect the residential component of mixed use development within Old Town. Therefore, staff is proposing that mixed use projects require one on-site parking space for each proposed residential unit. Staff is also proposing as part of this provision that if the parking requirement cannot be met, then the applicant may petition the Director of Planning to pay an "in-lieu" parking fee. This on-site parking requirement for residential uses in mixed use development will eliminate the need for residents to compete for parking on the street or in public parking lots and help ensure the viability of residential mixed-use development. The requirement that each unit be provided with its own private open space area can make it harder to provide the trad.itional downtown streetscape. To allow more flexibility, staff is recommending that private open space requirement for mixed use projects in the Old Town area be reduced from 150 square feet to 75 square feet per unit, and to allow the private open space requirement to be met. individually per unit, communally for the entire project, or in a combination of both approaches. Staff feels that this. additional flexibility for mixed use projects in the Tourist Retail Core Planning Area will better achieve the vision for the core of Old Town Temecula. Exoansion of the Historic Preservation Provisions In recent months, there has been a growing concern that the historic structures outside of Old Town Temecula do not have the same protections as the historic structures within Old Town. As a result staff has identified a mechanism to extend these protection provisions without creating a new Board or Commission. The proposal would modify the historic preservation provisions in Chapter V of the Old Town Specific Plan to apply to all designated historic structures within the City. According to the proposed amendment, the Old Town Local Review Board will have the opportunity to review any proposed changes to the exterior of the building before the Director of Planning or the Planning Commission considers the proposed changes. The other changes to the historic preservation requirements consist of a minor change to how a determination of historic appropriateness is made. The change focuses on the determination action rather than on the issuance of a certificate. The change does not effect how the Old Town Local Review Board currently operates. R:IOTSPlPIan AmendmenlsIPA04-0596 Supplemental C1ean-upIOTLRBIMemo.doc 2 Staff has sent a letter to the owners of the four historic sites outside of Old Town to make them aware of the City's plans. A copy of the letter is included in Attachment 2. Alleys Another area of concern is the need to protect the remaining alleys within Old Town Temecula. Over the years, many of the alleys within Old Town have been vacated. At this point in time only about half of them remain. Staff is recommending that the remaining alleys be maintained. To accomplish this, the proposed amendment would require the protection of the remaining alleys and would establish design and improvement criteria within the OTSP. Most of the remaining alleys would retain a primarily vehicular function. The exception is the small alley between Fourth and Fifth Streets that runs between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek. Portions of this alley have been designated primarily for pedestrian use. Other Clarifications/Chances The remaining changes represent minor adjustments and clarifications including: the updating of the correct title for the color palette, adding Day Spas as permitted uses in the Tourist Retain Core and Community Commercial Planning Areas, and clarifying that plywood in an unacceptable exterior material. Most of the remaining changes involve the restoration of several sign standards that had been approved during an earlier amendment and had been accidentally left out of an earlier amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending that the Old Town Local Review Board make a recommendation that the Planning Commission review the proposed changes to the Old Town Specific Plan and forward a recommendation to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS 1. Redline/Strike-out Revisions to the Old Town Specific Plan - Blue Page 4 2. Letter to Historic Site Owners Outside of Old Town - Blue Page 5 R:IOTSPIPIan AmendmentsIPA04-05% Supplemental Clean-upIOTLRBlMemo.doc 3 " -- - ... ATTACHMENT NO.1 REDLINElSTRIKE-OUT REVISIONS TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN R:IOTSPlPIan Amendmenl>\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-upIOTLRBlMemo.doc 4 MODIFICATIONS TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (New text is shown like this, deletions are shown like this this.) Hiah Densitv Residential Plannina Area 1. Amend second paragraph in Subsection III.C as follows: "Permitted uses for the Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), and Open Space (OS) Planning Areas shall be the same as identified in the Development Code for the Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential and Opens Space/Conservation wnes, respectively, as periodically amended, except that "for profit museums" shall also be conditionally permitted in 'the High Density Residential Planning Area. " Mixed Use Proiects 1. Amend portion of Table 11I-1 by adding "Mixed Use Projects" to the list of uses and footnote number 6 as follows: LIST OF USES l 'l'SR', liT . I MC /TRC 1 cc M Mixed Use Prl);ects · I P I I l P I I 6. Individual uses within ecu:h mixed use lJroiect shall be determined by this Land Use Matrix. 2. Delete Subsection III.F.3.b as follows: "C9Rditi9RtJllJSB J'enpit Re9l1iFelo ~A_ miNed 1I5e projset ID8Y aBly he estahlished after AM elJtai;,.;:,e,: .~. C8Rditi9B81 Use PeABit, as deseFihed ill the DeveJ: :~:J;...:: t Cede, aDd iB eaBf8F1B8Bee with th... 1.:"...........:... ...::;."-: :,1;:; of this seetieD." 3. Amend Subsection III.F.3.c.vi. as follows: "If aRoite r-eoilleRt llaFlEir'b :. f" ,,'<,iEleEl, One' parking space per residential unit shaH be provided on site and screened from public view. If this parking requirement cannot be met, then the applicant may petition the Director of Planning to accept an "in lieu" . parking fee. Acceptance of an "in-lieu" parking fee is oJ the discretion of the Director of Planning. Separate access drives and parking facilities should be provided for residential uses and commercial uses whenever possible." Allevs 1. Add a new Subsection III.F.15to read as follows: "15. Alleys R:IOTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documents\7Redllne Strike out Changes.doc I I , Designated alleys within Old Town shall be maintained and protected for future public use. The design and components within each alley shall be consistent with the purpose identified within this Specific Plan. Development projects adjacent to the designated aUeys will be required to construct improvements in and adjacent to the alley. These improvements shall include paving, lighting, or other necessary components to ensure the functionality and safety of the designated aUeys. Umited landscaping should be provided when feasible, provided that the functionality of the alley is not affected. When resident or business parking is established in the rear yard areas adjacent to the alleys, access to these parking spaces may be provided directly to the alleys." 2. Amend Subsection III.F.7 by adding an additional sentence: ''7. Loading Facilities Loading and unloading facilities shall be visually screened from access streets and adjacent properties and constructed in a manner to reasonably contain and restrict emission of noises typically attributed to such function. When screening of loading and unloading facilities is physically not possible, the facilities shall be architecturally integrated into the overall design of the building. Loading and unloading areas in or adjacent to the alleys do not require additional visual screening. " 3. Amend Section IV by adding a new Subsection L to read as follows: "L. ALLEY GUIDEliNES The aUeys in Old Town Temecula were originaUy created with the original plat and subdivision in the 1880's. Since that time, many of the alleys have been eliminated. As part of the revitaliZlltion efforts in Old Town, it has been detennined that the remaining aUeys need to be preserved and integrated into the Specific Plan. The purpose of this Section is to provide guidance on the use of alleys within the Old Town Temecula. The primary purposes of the remaining alleys are either for vehicular access or pedestrian .access. The primary goal of the vehicular access alleys is to provide service and rear area parking access to adjacent properties. The majority of these alleys are located between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street. The primary purposes of the pedestrian access alleys are to enhance the pedestrian connections between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek. The foUowing alleys between Old Town Front and Mercedes Streets will retain a primarily vehicular function: . . Between First and Second Streets . Between Third and Main Streets . Between Fourth and Fifth Streets . Between Fifth and Sixth Streets R:\OTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04.Q596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 2 The foUowing aUeys between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek will retain a primary pedestrian function: . Between Fourth and Fifth Streets The locations of these aUeys is shown on Exhibit IV-I. Guideline I - Functional Desil!n for Vehicular Access AUevs The alleys designated for primary vehicular access should comply with the foUowing criteria: . The minimum width of the aUey travelway shaU be at least a twenty (20)feet. . Parking spaces may back into the aUeys provided that at least 12 feet is provided between the centerline of the alley and the back of the parking space. . Pedestrian amenities may be provided along the vehicular access alleys provided that the use of the alley for vehicular access is not impaired or restricted. . Additional landscaping may be provided but is not required to be provided along the aUeys unless adjacent to pedestrian or resident seating areas and when additional screening is required. . Businesses may establish patron entrances from vehicular access alleys provided that additional space is provided to that an area at least six feet in width is provided to accommodate door swing and safe pedestrian movement into and out of the business. Guideline 2 - Functional Desil!n for Pedestrian Access AUevs The alleys designated for primary pedestrian access should comply with the foUowing criteria: . Pedestrian amenities such as fountains, landscaping and seating areas should be provided when limited vehicle use is not anticipated. . Businesses may take access from pedestrian access alleys. . Portions of pedestrian access alleys used for limited vehicular access should confonn to the requirements for vehicular access aUeys. R:IOTSPlPlan AmandmantsIPA04'()596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 3 IF I Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Exhibit IV-1 Alleys I I I i I i i I, \ I I \ ~ D. . ---- ~AlleV's to be Retained 'l::3 Study Awn ~Highw..ys .. I .. z.. ,. 41...., L::J Parcels ------ .~ = R:\OTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Doc~".o..~,' Redline Strike out Changes.doc 4 Exoansion of the Historic Provisions bevond Old Town Temecula 1, Make the following changes to Section V. "v.g!...~ TOWN TEMECULA LOCAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION , DISTRICT CONTENTS A. Purpose Page V-X B. Establishment of the District Page V-X C. Building Permits and Prohibitions Page V-X D. Old Town Local Review Board (OTLRB) Page V-X E. Old TeWB Temecula Local Historic Register Page V-X F. CeFtifieate Finding of Historic Appropriateness Page V-X G. Care and Maintenance Page V-X H. Additional Violation Provisions for Historic Structures Page V-X A. PURPOSE Protecting the cultural heritage and historical architectural resources found in Old Town and elsewhere in Temecula is part of the overall goal for the revitalization of Old Town and the protection of the community's heritage. The Old Town Specific Plan also gives owners of eligible historic properties relief from the contemporary municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws levied on newer contemporary structures. Historic structures on the Temecula Local Historic Register that are located outside of Old Town Temecula are also eligible to receive relief from contemporary municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws levied on newer contemporary structures. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT The boundary of the Old TewR Temecula Local Historic Preservation District shall be coterminous with the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan. In addition, the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District also includes the following historic structures outside of Old Town Specific Plan: 1. Vail Ranch Headquarters complex located at 32095 Highway 79 South 2. Vail Ranch House located at 31658 Via San Carlos 3. Wolf Tomb located at 45334 Maguey Court 4. Gonzalez Adobe located at 27645 Jefferson Avenue R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentslPA04-Q596 Supplemental Clean.uplPC Oocumentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 5 C. BUILDING PERMITS AND PROHmITIONS 1. Within the boundaries of the Old Ta'll'R Temecula Local Historic Preservation District no person shall demolish, remove, relocate, or cause to be relocated, alter, or cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be constructed or modify any designated historic building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with withaut the issueee af a Finding CeFtifieate of Historic Appropriateness. " 1.. ~~TitkiR the h8BRdaFies ef the Old Te,vR Histerie PFeservatioR DistFiet, B8 peFd.:J.... ~~AIl alter, 8' eBIISe 18 lJe altered, Bay desigRsted kistoFie InlildiBg 8F stflletBFe, eKeept ill stFiet e81Bplieee \1'ith tile pla&~ ltaf'f''' 9ved in e8BjunetioR with the issuaRee af a Certifieate af llisterie f.pprapriateaess. J...2, Within the boundaries of the Old Town Historic Preservation District, no person shall relocate, or cause to be relocated, alter, or cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be constructed, any building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with the isoliaBee sf a CeFtifieate Finding of Historic Appropriateness. 4,3. Within the boundaries of the Old TawR Temecula Local Historic Preservation District, no building permit shall be issued unless a Finding Certifieate of Historic Al'l'ovl'o;ateness is first made issued in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. ~. Interior building changes to non-historic building and structures that do not affect the buildings exterior are not required to obtain a Finding Certifieate of Historic At'P~vpJ.~ateness. 6.5. Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to exempt any person from complying with any other provision of law. D. OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD (OTLRB) I. The Old TaWIl Temecula Local Historic Preservation District shall have an advisory review board known as the Old Town Local Review Board to provide input into all major projects within the Old Town Specific Plan and to review any proposed modifications to any historic structure. The Director of Planning may also provide the Old Town Local Review Board with information on major projects that are either: adjacent to Old Town that may have the potential to affect the Old Town area or that are adjacent to or have the potential to affect any historic structure or site. ' 2. The Old Town Local Review Board shall be composed of five members and one alternate (who shall serve in the absence of any member). Board members shall be appointed by the City Council for terms of 3 years. The member terms shall be staggered so that all the members of the Old Town Local Review Board are not appointed at the same time. All members shall exhibit an interest in and R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04'()596 Supplemental Clean.uplPC Oocumentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 6 knowledge of the history and architecture of the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Preservation District. At least one member shall be knowledgeable in architectural and construction techniques. Members shall serve without pay. 3. The Old Town Local Review Board shall hold regular public meetings and establish such rules as may be aI'I'LVI',;ate or necessary for the orderly conduct of its business. Three members shall constitute a quorum. At its first meeting of the year, the Board members shall elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman (who will officiate the meetings when the Chairman is absent), who shall serve for terms of one year. 4. The Old Town Local Review Board shall have the following powers and duties in addition to those otherwise provided in this ordinance: a. Provide for pre-application conferences with individuals interested in constructing or altering p,~,..",,;y within the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Preservation District. The purpose of these conferences shall be to familiarize the applicant with the historic significance and related architectural themes of the district. b. For historic' structures within Old Town Temecula, utilize the adopted Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines in the review of applications as part of process to make findings of consistency and al'l"VI',;ateness with the Specific Plan. Use the Design Guidelines as a basis for approving or denying applications for a Finding Cerlifieale of Historic Appropriateness. For historic structures outside of Old Town Temecula, utilize the best available information for the architectural style of the historic structure to maintain the integrity of existing historic architecture as well as preserve its local historic context. c. Explore means for the protection, retention, and use of any significant structures, natural features, sites, and areas in the district including but not limited to a,..,..,~,..,;ate legislation and financing by independent funding organizations, or other private, local, state, or federal assistance. d. Serve as an advisory resource to all agencies of the City in matters pertaining to the Temecula Local Historic District, and to encourage efforts by, and cooperation with individuals, private organizations, and other governmental agencies concerned with preservation of the district's architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage. e. Render advice and guidance, upon request of the property owner or occupant regarding construction, restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping, or maintenance of any structure, natural feature, site or area within the district. R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentslPA04-Q596 Supplemental Cleen-uplPC Oocumentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 7 f. Encourage public understanding and appreciatIOn of the unique architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage of the district through educational and in;"'I",,,iative programs. E. OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOCAL HISTORIC REGISTER 1. The City Council has identified the following historic buildings and structures in Temecula. tile Old TewB area. These buildings and structures are officially designated on the Local Historic Register for the City of Temecula. All buildings on this list are eligible to receive any and all benefits authorized by the State of California for designated historic structures. The use of the Historic Building Code is specifically authorized for all historU: structures. (The dates for the historU: structures are approximate based upon the best available information.) 2. The list of Designated Historic Buildings and Structures is as fellews provided below. The locations of the designated historic buildings and structures in Old Town Temecula are shown on Exhibit V-I. Non-Old Town sites are shown on Exhibit V-2. a. Structures in Old Town Temecula . A. Saint Catherine's Church, 1920 B. Welty Building, 1897 C. Machado Store, 1910 D. Clogstone Restaurant, 1932 E. First National Bank, 1914 F. Palomar Hotel, 1915 G. Alec Escallier House, 1927-28 H. Burnham Store, 1902 1. Friedeman Meat Market, 1901 J. Welty Hotel, 1891 K. J.D. Welty, 1936 L. Arviso House, 1920 M. Unnamed residence, 1928 N. Bill Friedeman House, 1922 O. Nienke House, 1936 P. McConville House, early 1890's Q. Albert Nienke House, early 1920's R. G.A. Burnham House, early 1880's S. Al Otto House, 1882 b. Structures outside of Old Town Temecula Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex Vail Ranch House Wolf Tomb, 1887 Gonzalez Adobe, 1879 28314 Mercedes Street 28659 Old Town Front Street 28656 Old Town Front Street 28676 Old Town Front Street 28645 Old Town Front Street 28522 Old Town Front Street 41852 Main Street 42051 Main Street 42050 Main Street 42100 Main Street 42081 3rd Street 41915 4th Street 42251 6th Street 42291 6th Street 28575 Pujol Street 28585 Pujol Street 28649 Pujol Street 28653 Pujol Street 28717 Pujol Street 32095 Highway 79-South (formerly addressed as 32100) 31658 Via San Carlos 45334 Maguey Court 27645 Jefferson Avenue R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentslPA04'{)596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Oocumentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 8 Old Town Ternecula Specific Plan Exhibit V-1 Historic Structures Map A Saint Clf:herille's O1urch, 1920 B WeltyBuII<ing,1897 C MachadoStore.1910 D ClogSlOneRestaUref1t,1932 E. FlrstNatlonaIBa'lk,191<l F Pe/omllfHa:eI,1915 G. AJecEScalhefHouse,1927-28 H. EktmhsmStore, 1902 I. Riedeman MeatMBrkat, 1001 J. WElItyHoIeI,1891 K J.D. WeItf, 1936 l, AlVlsOHOOSe, 1920 M Unn-amedresldenca. 1828 N. Bill Friedem8ll House. 1922 O. Nienk&House,1936 p McConvHIe.HQuse,eertt 1890's a. AlbertNierikeHouse,ealty1910's R GAEktmttam House. E/arJv 1880's S AlOttoHouse,1882 28314 MefCedesSlroot 28659 Old TOWIl Frool Streel: 28656 OldTown Fra'lt street 28676 Okl Town Fronl Street 286450IdT~FronlStreet 28522 Old Town Front Street 41852 Main areet 42051MainSlreet 42050MainS!reet 42100MainStreel 420813rdSlreel 419154thSlreet 422S16thStreel 422916thStre<< 28575 Pujol Street 28585.PUjolStreet 28649Pujo1Street 28653 PuJol Street 28717 Pujol Street i , ] - 1'- 1 t:. , ~~ '" IIlDFut J ~llJio1<ftl~...""roJ~~=~~~~~:'~ 3. The foUowing historic structures in Old Town Temecula have been moved from their original locations. Saint Catherine's Church building (Historic Building "A") was relocated to Sam Hicks Monument Park in 1992. The Bill Preideman House (Historic Building "0") was relocated on the same site in 2003 as part of housing project sponsored by the City Redevelopment Agency. R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Oocumentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 9 EXIllBIT V-2 )( /;)7~\~1 . ;,""r~ " , 'r~':~;{~j AuguulJ,2lJ05 I "'~j~.", ....'}. j.-.. r-"":"--~ \J ".: ,..C;--;;f r (/ 1.':~ ,.t ,,' t:.j .t.,"Q--J ..1 1 (\ ~ 'Ji 1-'( ~:,'Hmt"!'~,--- ! y...:y (~ }:J;/' ! - .....J..;,...-._- ! ::'l~~ '" / .# / ", V~ \i/~ I (j~~~' J-t-'::>~-i';.L \ /\ '<{o'l' L.. t /> ( , y.J .....?:'1l.j..,.- \ ~ ~...'V..' f I -,... ~ ~ /\";.'-"" ': . '<\, II '-"'\'\ ~"t,~/ "/,'//\'J",,-'y '\ \:-.........../ f/ '.'_ y............ ,,,,_, \. <.. r ~\ ~ ~.. \"'- ' (~y,_ ...H~\~J:7-tJ;:\::'~~--:;YC:;:~J;' >,~\~/:\~//~~/~ tl,' " t~,.;t~A '~y i'-"'~\\' \i:, ,I I' -C'/.\ ;J.....<, ^-,'l'/~ "\ .;:t' /:';-__ ~"'",j-;~.~~..\ 1~ ":.:{' r'<:.~1 i \:' /;/ ---Z _.y II> u~".. 1 .. ( .' l~--"... i', )....... ;..J.ll.",....,.' ,,/_ ''Z -"',,\. . '\,," ~,,-' c;f'''?~' "0i ,A 1;<"'\1;'/">'\ 'C.- .I >., t-~W\'rr~N<': r;'<~//"''.,<, il-J {/-;..1:';:/" !-:r""'-\~- ,\\ --) \ -"v---f-...::f..:.;.::'Y\\': r,.'/,,,.....{ ,15: /J:":>:: JI .-'t::.pC''y--;.(:,-::-'^'''<j ,\ )-:- \\'" , >. ...-'r-:fL....fl:::-.-:~~~-....;l_p.-~:;~...;).<tw.\..:--":~...' < . 1 ,_.,:'--1 /" /./.-.........." "/ i '... 'r'1 \ -:." , ~),-"--""'FTt;-(~':r.:'-: ~L,''(h <'r \"-"1 z.t.- ,~ \ .,'''j' 1"1"'\ . ~"---Si7'~" ,,/.) .,\-~~../ I ("~' \. \"7~';</" v~\..~/-::~',:LJ, /,.::;Z .. / J, );:.~- \ 'I .Sot?( (\.' ).,.."-(..( ....~.-'\ "'~:15 ,; -, ;v:/./, \ .,.;' \ - " ,--, .....'/.f~ I '," \ '" , ,,....--r-"h'"j'<.1S,.; '. ~~.. ~'(". (' /.{, iV'"--'t~--::;-. '4 ":::,\:),,\:) IJ '~~.'Y ~ ,~~ ..-/ '\!( /?~,~~J?c?':':;:.~"/>;::~,\~-:>~~ ... '\, ':-.:' /', X .ro~,;",,0L'" r',~.. 1 , ' ,'~~~\''''''-f"r-::l.___ ____~. --: J,,...,,,7'-:,1\.l;'wr,,n,,~ \ ~, ", ~ -.... ",.,.. ~ ~ , , < \ ',-~ ~'I.(I\'(:'~[';"'-- ,. ...<.;J.~L '_..:)../'....,: '" \'':-;:f..IV'"{,.. ~..... ....1:~~' '\ ", """~'i/"~~'- ~ 'J~ .., \.ji~f ",;--~" /~' \...... ./(J-1("!I<:.',,- '. J ,:y' ' --.""'--~, -I '-\,'~ ','~r _'("::f':: '-l \, "iCy:r:< I ' \..l\'I\~('.=ilj:: );::;\, '~~:" "'\, \\t~::-,_":"'" ';/ .... ^-'~1J.!..r__~1I1'Y"" . \ \ ,"", '....., /. "~.,:<::. "'_j.~'I'J.J~,/, \::. . " ,- I ~... ,. , ~Z" ',""""""'_ '" '-,', \ ',r. v'~\ \,/< r )'" \ /'':/ it,.,,::;(~, \ "" V~ ! ~' ,>>: .,/.... 7 \"''' U,-","~\ ().""''Y\ \ ':- ';''x,} -'\'." //:..\)./,.."^ "<"'" . ) /) "~~, If ( ~ ' '--"~!-~I: - _./'v. "~:'_ ~,.~.~'-=-:;~~ / ,/ '.." ' , ----- ~ \ u" /- """~, ,,~--:.-<..'-. f I \; J\" A-(,,- \'1..:--'.'..... 'W".,\.: j \ \ / \...... J.-. ,_,,,\ CIl,O b.. -' ~ < r:.('~\~ ,.),~/ ..--,.......__.._.L.".".'""";./ . _.;....---.'i ~,c.ttI. .....) .....;... I ~~,.-'~} \,:;::/-~, ...... c ' " '\~ \ A ~ <"..>-1 -~. "J~~-+7/. } . Q J I N~' '-, ''':1,'- " ./''!:',-(;'' rl/- ). l I J { ~ /.J~ ' ""< /... I' 'S.J,I..) \ \ I '. J ki(>, (' . ~, I/l>>-! \ ~ o ""'..... ::JIll 1111 .... I ~u-u f\\:~r~:((;,y:~:~rp' /~;r/~~ -~ ..'" ('RUff ,O....f~\'-v , ..... jV J --"... \, ,.... n.) f ' <...t'-;.>:-'-<.,\' ,r:\'\..-..,~l.-' .1 Historic Sites Outside of Old Town r j \ ""---"'''''''''--'''''- ='t.~=:::=-:. .......--....- .---......,,,....--... --.... - "'''-,- .....- .._.......~.__...- - ..-..-... '11I_.",.._..... .--....--.. _-,lOa< _1IQ1_ .".llII" 0'" 1 ....., I ! ^ i ;' / f...;1 ;,+'" '-;:'\(/,:C< '-. / .,< ':/'\.. '", 'j- '-, '" '.........,,/ "">. '.c::'.... \..f'> \~,,/ x " I / 'x 4J. Since the initial adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan, a number of previously designated historic structures in Old Town Temecula were determined to be substantially dilapidated and/or unsafe and it was determined that these historic structures could not be rehabilitated. The following is' a list of designated historic structures that were demolished since the Plan's .initial adoption 1994. This listing has been provided for historic documentation purposes only. a. b. c. d. e. Harry Walters House, 1930's, 28535 Pujol Street Unnamed residence, 1920, 28735 Pujol Street Knott's Garage, 1910,28545 Old Town Front Street Angel Ramirez House, 1926,28731 Pujol Street Fred Ramirez House, 1920,28725 Pujol Street Removed in 1996 Removed in 1999 Removed in 2000 Removed in 2002 Removed in 2002 R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentslPA04.0596 Supplemental Clean.uplPC Oocumentsl7Redllne Strike out Changes.doc 10 -~ F. CERTIFIC,....TE FINDING OF mSTORIC APPROPRIATENESS 1. No existing designated historic building or .structure may be altered or demolished, and no new building or structure constructed without a the pFieP 9JlPFO'Vftl of Finding a Certifieate of Historic Appropriateness pursuant to the provisions of this Section prior to the alteration or demolition. The Finding shall be incorporated into the review and approval process for the requested change. 2. Certifieates A Finding of Historic Appropriateness within Old Town Temecula may be issued either by the Director of Planning or the Planning Commission or' City Council as part of the approval process for any development within the Old Town Specific Plan. The approval authority for a determinatioR of who 9Jlproves the Certifieates Finding of Historical Appwp>;ateness shall be based upon the approval authority established by the Development Code for the accompanying application. No development application for Level Two projects in Old Town, as described below, may be approved without a recommendation from the Old Town Local Review Board. 3. Certifieates A Finding of Historic Appropriateness for structures located outside of the Old Town Specific Plan may be approved by the Director of Planning for Level One projects and by the Planning Commission for Level Two projects. The Old Town Local Review Board shall review and provide comments on all requests to alter any historic structure. 4. For the purposes of implementing the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan and the requirements of the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District, there are two levels of Old Town development projects. The first category is the ministerial or minor projects, referred to as Level One projects. The second category is for non-ministerial and major projects, also called Level Two projects. a. Level One Proiects do not require the review and recommendation of the Old Town Local Review Board. Level One projects may be approved by administrative (staff only) review following the Director of Planning's determination to grant a Finding Certificate of Historical Appropriateness. Typical examples include the following: . Interior ehaRges or alterations to historic structures; Re-Iandscaping around existing structure; Re-roofing of an existing building; Additions and remodels to non-historic single family residences; Exterior architectural modifications to an existing commercial, office, or residential building effecting less than 25% of the froilt or street side exterior facade; The demolition to non-historic buildings and structures; New individual signs up to 12 square feet in size; and Changes in the copy of previously "pp>u led signs. . . . . . . . R:\OTSPlPlan AmendmentslPA04-D596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 11 The Director of Planning, at hislher tlteiF-sole discretion, may forward Level One projects to the Old Town Local Review Board when unique circumstances, or the sensitivity of adjacent historic structures or land uses indicate the potential for an adverse aesthetic impact. b. Level Two Projects have the potential for significant aesthetic impacts. Level Two Projects shall always require review by the Old Town Local Review Board prior to action by the approving authority. Typical examples of Level Two projects include, but are not limited to, the following: . Multi-family residential projects; . New commercial and office projects; . Exterior architectural modifications to an existing commercial, office, or residential building when 25% or more of the front or street side exterior facade is affected; . The alteration to a designated historic structure; . The demolition of, or substantial alteration to, a designated historic structure (requires Planning Commission approval); . New individual signs over 12 square feet; . Mini-monument signs located on architectural features that exceed the standard height requirement of four feet; and, . The removal of a specimen oak tree with a 10 inches or greater trunk diameter. 5. All applications shall be filed 9R tile f9FRlS ftRd in a manner determined by the Director of Planning.. Requests for a Finding of Historic Appropriateness :'..jlplieati9BS shall not be accepted unless they. are accompanied by the ayy.vy.:ate filing fee and such information and drawings as may be required by the Director of Planning. All applications for Certifieates a Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall be signed by either the owner of the property or a person authorized by the owner. All drawings shall be signed by the architect responsible for the design and must be in sufficient detail to show the proposed design for the site. This includes the architectural design and elevations (including signs), proposed materials, textures and colors (including material samples), and the site layout (including all improvements affecting appearances, such as walls, walks, terraces, plantings, accessory buildings, signs, lights, and other similar elements). 6. Following the receipt of a complete application, the Director of Planning shall schedule a meeting of the Old Town Local Review Board within 60 days and provide the Board with a staff report, including a copy of the site plan and . elevations. The Board shall review the application material and make a recommendation to approve or deny, with or without conditions, any requests for a Certifieates Finding of Historic Appropriateness to the approval authority designated by the Development Code. R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentslPA04-059S Supplemental Cleen-uplPC Documentsl7Redllne Strike out Changes.doc 12 -. - ~<_. . --- 7. In considering requests applieatioBs for Certifieates a Finding of Historic Al'l'wl',;ateness, the Old Town Local Review Board shall make the following findings: a. That the proposed structure is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of slate law and other ordinances of the city and is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. b. That the proposed structure is in conformance with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan, including the goals, objectives and policies, and architectural guidelines and standards. c. In the event of the proposed demolition of a designated historic building or structure, the Board shall also be required to find that applicant has submitted substantial evidence that the structure is imminently dangerous or unsafe and that the structure can not be effectively repaired or retrofitted. 8. The expiration date for a Certifieates Finding of Historic AI'I',vl',;ateness shall be the same as expiration date for the accompanying planning application, as may be extended pursuant to the provisions of the Development Code. If the Development Code does not specify an expiration date, the project for which the Certifieates Finding of Historic Appropriateness was approved shall commence construction within three years of the date of approval or the Certifieates Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall become null and void. No extensions of time will be allowed for these projects. G. MAINTENANCE AND CARE 1. The owner, occupant, or other person in actual charge of an building or structure on Temecula Local Historic Register shall keep in good repair all of the exterior portions of such improvement, building, or structure, all of the interior portions thereof when subject to control as specified in the designation statement, and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior architectural feature. 2. Nothing in the requirements of section shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior architectural feature in or on any designated Temecula Local Historic Register building of structure that does not involve a change in design, material, or external appearance thereof. R:\OTSPlPlan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 13 H. ADDITIONAL VIOLATION PROVISIONS FOR HISTORIC STRUCTURES 1. In addition to the general violation provisions in Section III.H.7 of the Specific Plan, any person who demolishes, alters or removes a building or structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register, that person and the owner shall be required to restore the building, site, or structure to its original condition and selling prior to the violation within ninety days. Any action to enforce this provision may be brought by the city or any other interested party. This civil remedy shall be in addition to, any criminal prosecution and penalty and any other remedy provided bylaw 2. If any person demolishes or removes aD building or structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register in violation of this section, no building or construction related (including grading) permits or permits to use the PLVp.:..ty as a parking area or other commercial venture shall be issued for a period of up to seven years, at the City Council's discretion, based on the significance of the resource from.the . date of demolition, except to replicate the lost resource. The failure to adequately maintain a designated historic building or structure can also be considered to constitute the unauthorized demolition of a building or structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register. For the purpose of this section, the demolition shall be presumed to have occurred on the date the city has actual knowledge of the demolition. The owner shall have the burden of providing an earlier date, if entitlement to an earlier date is claimed. The owner shall have the affirmative obligations to plant and maintain turf grass, to provide a temporary irrigation system to maintain such landscaping, and te prevent the accumulation of debris and waste on the property during the interim period." R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmenlsIPA04-0596 Supplementai Clean-uplPC Documenlsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 14 Sian Standards - 1. Make the following changes to the Sign Standards in Section III. "G. SIGN REGULATIONS The intent of these regulations is to establish specific standards for all exterior signage that will ensure continuity, consistency, and hannony with the architectural quality of the Old Town environment as it may have appeared in the early 1900's. 1. Applicability These regulations shall apply to all signage within the Tourist Retail Core and Tourist Serving Residential areas of the Specific Plan. Signage within the Highway Tourist Commercial District, Community Commercial, Medium Density Residential District, and High Density Residential Land Use Districts shall comply with the sign requirements contained in the Development Code and the Signage Design Guidelines contained in Section IV.J of the Specific Plan. 2. Permit Required Unless specifically stated in these regulations, a sign permit is required prior to placing, erecting, moving, reconstructing, altering, or displaying any sign within the Specific Plan. 3. Prohibitions No person shall erect, re-erect, construct, enlarge, alter, move, improve, remove, convert, or equip any sign or sign structure or cause or permit the same to be done contrary to, or in violation of, the provisions of these sign regulations. All signs not expressly permitted by this Section are prohibited. No application for sign permit or other application for a prohibited sign shall be accepted, acted upon, or approved. 4. Prohibited Signs in Old Town o Freestanding signs on lots with less than 150' of road frontage (except/or mini monument signs) o Roof mounted signs o Animated signs, including time and temperature displays o Rotating, moving, emitting, or flashing signs o Balloon signs o Ambient air balloons o Internally illuminated signs, including front and back lit awning and window locations o Neon tube signs o Window signs above the second story o Paper, cloth, or plastic streamers or bunting - except holiday decorations o Formed plastic or injection molded signs R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Oocumentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 15 o Statues used for advertising o Traffic sign replicas o Vehicle signs o Any sign not permitted by this Specific Plan o Any sign prohibited by the Development Code and not expressly permitted in this Specific Plan S. Permitted Signs o Mini-monument Signs (for buildings constructed before 1994) o Wall Mounted Signs (business identification) o Hanging Signs' o . Rear and Interior Facing Signs o Sup.;.'5'''phics o Freestanding Signs o Window Signs o Under Canopy Signs o Awning Signs o Projecting Signs o Indirectly llluminated Signs o Temporary A-Frame or Sandwich Board Signs o Accessory Signs (examples include building name, directional, menu board, and daily special signs) , 6. Sign Standards a. Allowable Sign Area. Unless specifically exempted for this requirement, the total amount of signage for each business shall be limited to the following. i. For business establishments having q. single frontage onto a public street, or buildings with one building entrance, are permitted a maximum total square footage equal to 1.5 square feet of sign per linear frontage foot of business establishment. Each business may use any combination of the following signs to arrive at the total allowable square footage. However, each sign shall not exceed the maximum square footage described in this Section, ii. For business establishments having frontage onto two public street are permitted a maximum total square footage equal to 1.5 square feet of sign per linear frontage foot of business establishment along the primary street and 0.5 square feet of sign area per linear frontage foot of business establishment along the secondary street.. Each business may use any combination of the following signs to arrive at the total allowable square footage. However, each sign shall not exceed the maximum square footage described in this Section. R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 16 b. Buildilll! Surface Silffis. Except as specified below, all building surface signage shall be counted toward the maximum allowable sign area. i. Wall Mounted Silffis. Maximum of one square foot per linear frontage foot of business establishment. To be located no higher than the lowest of the following points: . 25 feet above grade; . Bottom of the sill line of the second floor windows; or . . Cornice line of the building. ii. Hamnnf! Sims,. As an alternative to the standard wall sign, an under canopy hanging sign may be used. Hanging signs must be parallel to the street and, in addition hanging signs may not exceed 75% of the width of the business frontage or be more than 12 inches in height. If located over a walkway, the vertical clearance between the bottom of the sign and walking grade shall be a minimum of 7 feet. iii. Rear Fadml Sillns. If a building has parking or pedestrian access at the rear, each business is permitted a maximum of one sign, not to exceed 3 square feet. The rear facing sign can either be located adjacent to the entry point, or on the exterior rear facing wall of the business. iv. Interior Facim! Sil'ns. Where a building has a courtyard or interior plaza that can not' be viewed from the public right of way, each business shall be permitted a maximum of one sign, not to exceed 5 percent of the total interior courtyard wall area of the business. Interior facing signage shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. v. Sunefl!raohics. The purpose of allowing wall supergraphics is to allow the advertising or depiction of products that may have been available in an 1890's marketplace. A supergraphic is a mosaic, mural, painting, graphic art, or combination thereof which is professionally applied to a building that does not contain any brand name, product name, letters of the alphabet spelling or abbreviating the name of any product, company, profession, or business, or any logo, trademark, trade name, or other commercial message. Maximum size shall not exceed 60 percent of wall surface. Supergraphics shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. R:IOTSP\Plan AmendmentSlPA04-o596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redline Strtke out Changes.doc 17 c. Other Buildinl! Silms. All window, awning and projecting signs shall be counted toward the maximum allowable sign area. i. Permanent Window Sil!ns. On ground level: coverage shall not exceed 20 percent of the total window and door area visible from the exterior of the building; on second leve: coverage shall not exceed 30 percent per window. (No window signs are permitted above secondfloor). ii. Awninl! Sims. On ground floor level: coverage shall not exceed 20 percent III8lBIBIUB eovemge allowed of the total exterior surface area of each awning. On the second floor level and above: coverage shall not exceed 10 percent IHHiIlHlIB eo\'emge aIlewed of the total exterior surface area of each awning. Internally illumination prohibited. '" -." II Ii, iii. Proiectinl! Sil!ns. . One per business allowed; maximum size may not exceed 6 square feet and shall not extend more than 4 feet from the wall surface. Ne nIumination is not allowed. Projecting signs shall only be attached to buildings, not to poles or other signs, and shall maintain at least 7 feet of vertical clearance between the bottom of the sign and walking grade. Projecting signs may encroach into the public right-of-way a maximum of 3 feet subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. No tenant may have both a projecting and mini- monument sign. R:\OTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Oocuments\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 18 c ",., t~ic::.~'" - "'., -~ JA~I~~' '-"" . - -. - ...w Gilts For The Home ~.",G.ilrft~,n tt. ' 'laatllrt'-~Jjwr iv. Under CanoDv Si!!Ils. One per business allowed. Pennitted. under a canopy, roof, covered walkway, or porch; maximum size of 3 square feet; minimum of 7 feet of vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. d. Freestandinf! Sif!ns. Freestanding signs shall not be c.ounted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. Only one freestanding sign is allowed per site. For this purpose, "site" is defined as any single parcel or a group of parcels developed under a unified development plan, whichever covers the larger area. i. Multi-tenant Si!!ns. A maximum of one double sided sign per street frontage if said street frontage is over 150 feet Height of sign shall not exceed 6 feet above grade. Width shall not exceed 4 feet Each tenant placard shall not exceed 12 inches in heighL Sign may only be indirectly illuminated, internal illumination is R:IOTSPlPlen AmendmentsIPA04c0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 19 prohibited. No monument signs are allowed if the street frontage is less than 150 feet. ii. Mini-Monument Sillns. A maximum of one double face mini- monument sign is permitted if the street frontage is less than 150 feet, if th"e building existed prior to 1994, and if the building is set back more that ten feet from the street. The maximum sign area shall not exceed 6 square feet. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated, internal illumination is prohibited. The height of the sign shall not exceed 4 feet. If a sign is placed on a creative, time appropriate architectural element such as a covered wagon, wagon wheel, railroad cart, etc, the height may be increased consistent with period element at the sole discretion of the Director of Planning. If a building has more than one tenant or building per lot, there shall still only be one mini-monument sign allowed. e. Temoorarv Siens. Temporary signs shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area pennitted for the business or building. The types of temporary signs are as follows. i. Jemoorarv Banners. Temporary grand opening and special event signs are allowed for each business establishment on the exterior wall. Signs shall not be attached to any other freestanding element (porch balustrade, garden wall, tree, monument sign, vehicle, etc.). Signs shall be constructed of cloth, canvas, or other durable material. Plastic or vinyl banner signs are not pennitted. The use of neon colored/day glow banner signs is are also prohibited. All temporary signs, except for A-Frame/Sandwich Boards, shall abide by the provisions of the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs, as amended. ii. A-Frame/Sandwich Board Silrn. One A-frame or sandwich board sign allowed per properly on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and designated Monday holidays. The size shall not exceed 3.5 feet high and 2 feet wide. A-frame signs shall not block the sidewalk: and shall not be illuminated. No permit is required for A-frame and sandwich board signs which comply with . these provisions. f. Accessorv Siens. Accessory signs shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area pennitted for the business or building. The types of accessory signs are as follows. i. Buildinll Name Silln. The purpose of allowing building name signs is to allow for the identification of buildings. The maximum size shall not exceed 10 percent of the wall surface. In the event that the building name advertises one or more R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 20 businesses located within the building, the signage will not be considered a building name sign but will be included in the total square footage permitted for the business or building. ii. Directional Si!!lls. Interior project directional signage may be allowed in interior courtyards or adjacent to stairways or elevators, to guide patrons to rear area and upstairs tenants. The maximum size may not exceed , up t8 3 square feet. in sill!e, iii. Menu Boards. One menu board is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. up-te The maximum size may not exceed 4 square feet in area, Menu Boards may contain only the name of the establishment and the food available inside. The menu board must be located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance. Appropriate locallon for menu boarc1 sign M.nu ..... -l iv. Dailv SlJecial Sif!ns. One display area size near the primary entrance is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. The maximum size is 4 square feet. g. Flaf!s. A maximum of three colored flags may be displayed at any one time. The maximum size is 6 square feet. These flags may not contain writing, insignias, or logos. R:\OTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Oocuments\7Redllne Strike out Changes.doc 21 Miscellaneous and Tvoooraohic Chanoes 1. Add the following use to the List of Uses in Table 11I-1: I LIST Of USES I Day Spa . TSR5 HT OTC TRC p2 CC p 2. In Table 11I-1, revise footnote Number 2to read as follows: 2 The uses are is limited to either the second floor (or higher) or to a location that does not front upon or open directly onto either -Old Town Front Street or aBd BGB Main Street pareel s. 3. In Section III.F.3.c, revise item iv to read as follows: "iv. Structures with heights greater than tw& three stories shall set back on the street frontage sides for the fourth floor portion of the structure a minimum of 10 feet except in cases of exceptional building-design and material quality or when the Director of Planning determines that a distance of less than 10 feet is appropriote." 4. Amend Table 11I-2 by replacing the minimum private opens space per unit in the TRCfTSR zoning district from ~ square feet per unit to 75 square feet per unit. 5. Amend Table 111-2 by modifying footnote number 3to read as follows: "3. Buildingi' shall be setback exactly ten feet if no covered arcade or porch is provided at the front of the building except in cases of exceptional building- design and material quality and when the Director of Planning determines that a lesser distance will achieve the streetscape goals of this Specific Plan." 6. Amend Table 11I-2 by modifying footnote number 6to read as follows: "6. Landscaping of the front yard for residential projects in the TSR Planning Area is required. Limited accent landscaping shauld shall be provided whenever possible in all other circumstances. and always between the front of the building and the public right-of-way." 7. Amend Table 11I-2 by adding a footnote number 7 beside the "75 sq. ft." under the Minimum Private Open Space/Unit for the TSRfTSR Planning Area to read as follows: "7. In lieu of providing 75 square feet of private opens space per unit for mixed use projects, the amount of private open spcu:e may be reduced if combined with common private open space, as long as the total open space required for the project remains the same." R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-Q596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Oocumentsl7Redline Strtke out Changes.doc 22 8. . In the Title for Section 1I1.E.3. replace the second "CeEles" with "Regulations". 9. In Section IV.B.1, add a new bullet item to the list of discouraged materials to read as follows: ". Plywood" 1 O. In Section IV.B.1, revise the last bullet item for Guideline 7to read as follows: ". Rough textured vertical wood siding {stKh l:~ p~'waad) with appropriately spaced wooden battens." 11. In Sections IV.B.1 and 3, replace the words "HeFilage CaIups" with "Preservation Exterior Palette". R:IOTSPlPlen AmendmentslPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Oocumentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 23 --. ,'~-- ATTACHMENT NO.2 LETTER TO HISTORIC SITE OWNERS OUTSIDE OF OLD TOWN R:\OTSP\P1an Amendments\P A04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\OTLRB\Memo.doc 5 L City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive. Temecula, CA 92590 . Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 . Temecula, CA 92589-9033 (951) 694-6400 . FAX (951) 694-6477 March 2, 2006 Dear Property Owner: The City of Temecula will be considering a proposal to expand the protection for certain historic structures outside of the Old Town area in the next few months. At present, only designated historic structures within the Old Town Temecula area receive specific protections. The proposal would require that any changes to a designated historic structure be reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board and approved by the City of Temecula prior to any changes being made. The proposal would also make the property owner responsible for maintaining the historic structure to prevent any further deterioration. The proposal would expand these 1'" ~;oJ.ions to four designated historic sites in other parts of the City. These four non-Old Town Temecula sites are: . Vail Ranch Headquarters complex located at 32095 Highway 79 South; . Vail Ranch House located at 31658 Via San Carlos; . Wolf Tomb located at 45334 Maguey Court; and, . Gonzalez Adobe located at 27645 Jefferson Avenue. The purpose of this letter is to notify you that we anticipate that the Old Town Local Review Board will discuss this matter on Tuesday, March 13, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. in the Main Conference Room located at 43200 Business Park Drive in Temecula. Following the Old Town Local Review Board's review, we also anticipate this proposal will be presented to the PI<lnning Commission and then the City Council for consideration. We have enclosed a copy of the proposed changes to the current historic preservation provisions located in Chapter V of the Old Town Specific Plan. This material shows the existing text, the new text th<lt is proposed to be <Idded (shown in bold Italics), <Ind the text being proposed for deletion (shown in !Jolded stFike eut). If you have any questions, please contact me at (951) 694-6400. Sincerely, ~~-<-. ~bp.O~ Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning DUlks R:\OTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\Hlslorlc Properly Owner Letter.doc - Proposed Revisions to the Historic Preservation Provisions originally adopted as part of the Old Town Specific Plan - "V. OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOCAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICT CONTENTS A. Purpose B. Establishment of the District C. Building Permits and Prohibitions D. Old Town Local Review Board (OTLRB) E. Old Town Temecula Local Historic Register F. Cemfieate Finding of Historic Appropriateness G. Care and Maintenance H Additional Violation Provisions for Historic Structures Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X A. PURPOSE Protecting the cultural heritage and historical architectural resources found in Old Town and elsewhere in Temecula is part of the overall goal for the revitalization of Old. Town and the protection of the community's heritage. The Old Town Specific Plan also gives owners of eligible N510ric properties relief from the contemporary municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws levied on newer contemporary structures. Historic structures on the Temeculll Local Historic Register that are located outside of Old Town Temecula are also eligible to receive relief from contemporary municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws levied on newer contemporary structures. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT The boundary of the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Preservation District shall be coterminous with the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan. In addition, the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District also includes ihe following historic structures outside of Old Town SpecifIC Plan: 1. Vail Ranch Headquarters complex located at 32095 Highway 79 South 2. Vail Ranch House located at 31658 Via San Carlos 3. Wolf Tomb located at 45334 Maguey Court 4. Gonzalez Adobe located at 27645 Jefferson Avenue R:\OTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-lJplHistoric Property Owner Letter.doc 2 C. BUILDING PERMITS AND PROIDBITIONS 1. Within the boundaries of the Old TDWB Temecula Local Historic Preservation District no person shall demolish, remove, relocate, or cause to be relocated, alter, or cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be constructed or modify any designated historic building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with without the iSBuaBee of a Finding Certifieate of Historic Appropriateness. 2. 'VithiB the bouBdarieB of the Old TDWB Hil!torie PreseFntioB Dismet, BO persoB shall altei) OF eause to be alteFed, a~y desigBated histoFie buildiBg OF strueture, Keep. iB stFiet e:::+ ".,.:.::.ee with thl rl.;..~._J apPF9ved in e;ll.;-'; : ffi&B with the il!~.""" 3fa Cemfieate of Histerie I.PPF,. ,.,:,/,_ ;h2. Within the boundaries of the Old Town Historic Preservation District, no person shall relocate, or cause to be relocated, alter, or cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be constructed, any building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with the iss_e zf::l Ceflifieate Finding of Historic Appwp.;ateness. 4:3. Within the boundaries of the Old TOWB Temecula Local Historic Preservation District, no building permit shall be issued unless a Finding Cemfieate of Historic App.vp,;ateness is first made issued in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. ~. Interior building changes to non-historic building and structures that do not affect the buildings exterior are not required to obtain a Finding CeFtifieate of Historic Appropriateness. ~5. Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to exempt any person from complying with any other provision oflaw. D. OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD (OTLRB) 1. The Old TDWB Temecula Local Historic Preservation District shall have an advisory review board known as the Old Town Local Review Board to provide input into all major projects within the Old Town Specific Plan and to review any proposed modifICations to any historic structure.' The Director of Planning may also provide the Old Town "Local Review Board with information on major projects that are either: adjacent to Old Town that may have the potential to affect the Old Town area or that are adjacent to or have the potential to affect any historic structure or site. . 2. The Old Town Local Review Board shall be composed of five members and one alternate (who shall serve in the absence of any member). Board members shall be. appointed by the City Council for terms of 3 years. The member terms shall be staggered so that all the members of the Old Town Local Review Board are not appointed at the same' time. All members shall exhibit an interest in and R:\OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplHistoric Properly OWner Letter.doc 3 L knowledge of the history and architecture of the Old TewB Temecula Local Historic Preservation District. At least one member shall be knowledgeable in architectural and construction techniques. Members shall serve without pay. 3. The Old Town Local Review Board shall hold regular public meetings and establish such rules as may be al'l"Vl'.:ate or necessary for the orderly conduct of its business. Three members shall constitute a quorum. At its first meeting of the year, the Board members shall elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman (who will officiate the meetings when the Chairman is absent), who shall serve for terms of one year. 4. The Old Town Local Review Board shall have the following powers and duties in addition to those otherwise provided in this ordinance: a. Provide for pre-application conferences with individuals interested in constructing or altering property within the Old T9WB Temecula Local Historic Preservation District. The purpose of these conferences shall be to familiarize the applicant with the historic significance and related architectural themes of the district. b. For historic structures within Old Town Temecula, utilize the adopted Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines in the review of applications as part of process to make! findings of consistency and "J-'P'\'l'.;ateness with the Specific Plan. Use the Design Guidelines as a basis for approving or denying applications for a Finding Certifiellte of Historic Appropriateness. For historic structures outside of Old Town Temecula, utilize the best available information for the architectural style of the historic structure to maintain the integrity of existing historic architecture as well as preserve its local historic context. c. Explore means for the protection, retention, and use of any significant structures, natural features, sites, and areas in the district including but not limited to "l'l"Vl'.;ate legislation and fmancing by independent funding organizations, or other private, local, state, or federal assistance. d. Serve as an advisory resource to all agencies of the City in matters pertaining to the Temecula Local Historic District, and to encourage efforts by, and cooperation with individuals, private organizations, and other governmental agencies concerned with preservation of the district's architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage. e. Render advice and guidance, upon request of the property owner or occupant regarding construction, restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping, or maintenance of any structure, natural feature, site. or area within the district. R:\OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplHistorlc Properly ,OWner Letter.doc 4 f. Encourage public understanding and appreciation of the unique architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage of the district through educational and int...p...;..;;ve programs. E. OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOCAL HISTORIC REGISTER 1. The City Council has identified the following historic buildings and structures in Temecula. the Old TIIWB aFea. These buildingr and structures are officially designated on the Local Historic Register for the City of Temecula. All buildings on this list are eligible to receive any and all benefits authorized by the State of California for designated historic structures. The use of the Historic Building Code is specifically authorized for aU historic structures. (The dates for the historic structures are approximate based upon the best available information.) , 2. The list of Designated Historic Buildings and Structures is as fellows provided below. The locations of the designated historic buildings and strUctures in Old Town Temecula are shown on Exhibit V-I. Non-Old Town sites are shown on Exhibit V-2. a. Structures in Old Town Temecula A. Saint Catherine's Church, 1920 B. Welty Building, 1897 C. Machado Store, 1910 D. Clogstone Restaurant, 1932 E. First National Bank, 1914 F. Palomar Hotel, 1915 G. Alec Escallier House, 1927-28 H. Burnham Store, 1902 I. Friedeman Meat Market, 1901 J. Welty Hotel, 1891 K. J.D. Welty, 1936 1. Arviso House, 1920 M. Unnamed residence, 1928 N. Bill Friedeman House, 1922 O. Nienke House, 1936 P. McConville House, early 1890's Q. Albert Nienke House, early 1920's ' R. G.A. BurDham House, early 1880's S. Al Otto House, 1882 b. Structures outside of Old Town Temecula Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex Vail Ranch HOllSe Wolf Tomb, 1887 Gonzalez Adobe, 1879 28314 Mercedes Street 28659 Old Town Front Street 28656 Old Town Front Street 28676 Old Town Front Street 28645 Old Town Front Street 28522 Old Town Front Street 41852 Main Street 42051 Main Street 42050 Main Street 42100 Main Street 42081 3rd Street 41915 4th Street 42251 6th Street 42291 6th Street 28575 Pujol Street 28585 Pujol Street 28649 Pujol Street 28~53 Pujol Street 28717 Pujol Street 32095 Highway 79-South ' (formerly addressed as 32100) 31658 Via San Carlos 45334 Maguey Court 27645 Jefferson Avenue R:\OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\Hisloric Property Owner Letter.doc 5 '"-".- Old Town Teme<lilla Speoific Plan EllhibilV'l HistoriciStruoW~Map A.. $iiIn~.~~tl9~01urch,1920 a wirtieuR4Il"Ig, 18W c, N\aehatkl$ott, 1910 D,. (;IQ:QsfDne-Rest8Ur511.1932 e.PlrJI~eI'88rik,1914 F Pelomet'H<t8l, Hl.15 ' G. .Ntt"ESt8lUer HOOse, 192M8 H.lllmliem,Stm.19J2 1.~~etMllI1<8t.1CD1 J. W<lW."".,89, f<, J,[),WllllY;1936 L. ArvIsoflQUSe. 1920 M. ~nllJniKtresidenc.,1928 N. BlI,f~edllm8n HtlU~. 1922 O. 'Nienke.tlous8,1938 .p McCO.nvlhl!lt1ouse,esr~ 11l1D's Q';~lIIleinkilHouse,e8flV192O's R. GJ\..Qimhem Hou$$. ..~ 18$O's S. AlOft'oHoiiM.1882 I, ~ "" .... ~F'~I ""...... .....---.,... 3. The following historic structures in Old Town Temecula have been moved from their original locations. Saint Catherine's Church building (Historic Building "A") was relocated to Sam Hicks Monument Park in 1992. The Bill Freideman House (Historic Building "0") was relocated on the same site in 2003 as part of housing project sponsored by the City Redevelopment Agency. R:\OTSPlPlan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplHistoric Properly Owner Letter.doc 6 EXHmITV-2 Jr ,1,-::>,"," \ /0'4') Historic Sites Outside of Old Town "f.f4~ l<ugusl3l,:IlOO l~"".y "Y f .~, , :::J""""/'I.-" ", J~,( '., , r I i)'-'~yf (~"': fr~ -fJ ',) 'f),-' , - )ij: tIS; ~-~. /\ ....../',..~" 1 -1/",\ ../}'-'-:;. - '..p:i V . \, \ ;/ ", '_ -;1"..... < l " '- \ - \...-Y '~'h:I",-- \ ~/f/. ..- ". -\_ f9i>:~/l-\,,:~'):~/.,~~\~~.~~-';j'-~\\.. /.' r..tr._.,..,\ ./\ __ fC-.-J. .~.~, ~,'--.{"~,~.,V,'~ ,')\ " "'';'J' / ~./') / "..,-^'- :>c' ~-'/., r"'''. ^', j' ,',*," \ 'I ' ~-:;"~-0-' f--J :\' \.; Y\,' ,. ,'/ \r )((, ~ ":>'--1i;"'r..-,-,,--,a-.(.. v_ \,~ "~~~_/(~1\t>.\ ,;;-"/J~~ , ('!:1I.. \ I)"._)<;.>-.,,;..--~...";h'" :, ~~ ,>~. \ "'~<,>' ,'7j' -;-~-<"~\ .;t<'./(-l~";'("';; ;7;> ,~ :'l/~~'~(:" '~-':":'''/:--./\ ," \"'\....~ r-....:T.-1<\II!../ "~I/ .<.1;::....':).." ,(/'-/~'7"'. "1.) ',. \ \1 .' ..' [, i "--'{B" /"',y' b"~/ .,~ /y'. , \ '/" :":I~ "4,."S' ._"": ""'-r"', ...-"\ \-~ ,..'<~ ~ '< \ \ _.-+-~~ / ....-A, ,_' ''''''.'''' \, \.( ~ ~ '\ \ .~-'- ;:;;':\\ \""~f:". :.;;,>:'-;'- ,.' '.,',;,:>/, . ~..iP/ ~ ~-.}f.::: \~(~, ~'-;.;^; ~/ , .;;:-, \ r', / \ . "f' v',. :I... :r;:,r.,.. ,--,,-"-" ,.~'., ~ i ! '(' ~ ~ {'-, '4. .(~. 1....1~K ..~.)..:" ,{ \ ......,~ ,'~ /y....--ty-r-j:~.Y'.~4, .:.~'~, :-:(,.~";. __,1 ,,~:> V'l '..;,~<v;'~ \)' '1' /?0' ,j.;'~';"/<;~'" c::.. 'Y I. ,> ," . -rr^ f-'~,o',' :>. ;;:. I " ","I, "~~~ --::- ____ ,.......{, \..\"f'~~~\ '1.""-( \...... ".,' "r~'( 'J""" Vi- V" \-"'~- ':J c,' -:: << , \- ~ ..-, ~ - \ \.... X"'C... '7"'! ~'f'" .~.<>" .. 7,' '>-:' - ", \- . "-r '. '("iI i'r: ,., *" >" ~,~ - ~~...---r--...J_ -...L--'J \ t.:~~~~~~'fF:'~'~\iL, ~; ,../T' L' <~'~\':k?\'J'IY~"'-:"lU;j,~" -\/'- I .;-... / ~- "~~~:,--::, , .; ~)1~( )' ,l..... ' </1 1 :~:.-C:? (y ~, , ... -' \:"" r ~ ''\' l;"'-- ,;-.-;", \ "'~' ,'--- '(' / ~y~~.~:- ~,: , _ .""\ " r-.?l%':' '.......<:::;...- ..1 '.>, '\\~l./ ~'7'\\":' ..' :".... 10_ C):.--~~ ~"~~;": '~~ -....... 6_-) -;:":" ,I" \ -...,,,>, / I~ CollI. ....) ~"'J ' ~ [~ );?'.;,... l':D.....[:W" \-.," ,;.~;X,i~::.;,,'!:;,I'" I;' /il~ I~ )z~.;;J> ...... f...';'--';'?!() '~ ( 'j-'i.>)1*.;>-;j-'""~"';..,~~~\,~ r ..wolft.oof!.",~;",':7^:;y,~');i>r'): '\:-x .,'. \, "71V~~~}'J' ^.. ./,,' ~\'''*-I-::G \ ').~~ ....." "/ ~)"\ ", J' 'yo '~',;, . ....I::lI~ ')., ,.,,',) .... \' "'";',, , ) '-<",( I . -'''''''''''.-'-'''',~~.''-'..'''''''.' , , ~~~~! e . -- - - - , ...---...... 5=-P~-===:. .w.. __ ==--...,o;:-...t::::"..:.... ....,_.- ... ::=.........._-.::....--:... ..._h...._..... -1IlI1_ .......D1ot1 ~-- D'" -G. Since the initial adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan, a number of previously designated historic structures in Old Town Temecula were determined to be substantially dilapidated and/or unsafe and it was determined that these historic structures could not be rehabilitated. The following is a list of designated historic structures that were demolished since the Plan's initial adoption 1994. This listing has been provided for historic documentation purposes only. a. b. c. d. e. Harry Walters House, 1930's, 28535 Pujol Street Unnamed residence, 1920, 28735 Pujol Street Knott's Garage, 1910,28545 Old Town Front Street Angel Ramirez House, 1926, 28731 Pujol Street Fred Ramirez House, 1920, 28725 Pujol Street Removed in 1996 Removed in 1999 Removed in 2000 Removed in 2002 Removed in 2002 R:\OTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplHlstoric Property Owner Letter.doc 2 F. CERTlFIC..\TE FINDING OF HISTORIC APPROPRIATENESS 1. No existing designated historic building or structure may be altered or demolished, and no new building or structure constructed without a the pPieF appFBVaI Bf Finding a CeJ'tifieate of Historic Appropriateness pursuant to the provisions of this Section prior to the alteration or demolition. The Finding shall be incorporated into the review and approval process for the requested change. 2. Certifieates A Finding of Historic A......<v...<:ateness within Old Town Temecula may be issued either by the Director of Planning or the Planning Commission or City Council as part of the approval process for any development within the Old Town Specific Plan. The approval authority for a deteP ":.,.,,,iBB Bf whB appl'6\'8s tile Ceriifieates Finding of Historical A......<v...,:ateness shall be based upon the ,"......<v/al authority established by the Development Code for the accompanying application. No development application for Level Two projects in Old Town, as described below, may be approved without a recommendation from the Old Town Local Review Board. 3. Certifieates A Finding of Historic Appropriateness for structures located outside of the Old Town SpecifIC Plan may be approved by the Director of Planning for Level One projects and by the Planning Commission for Level Two projects. The Old Town Local Review Board shall review and provide comments on all requests to alter any historic structure. 4. For the purposes of implementing the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan and the requirements of the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District, there are two levels of Old Town development projects. The first category is the ministerial or minor projects, referred to as Level One projects. The second category is for non-ministerial and major projects, also called Level Two projects. a. Level One Proiects do not require the review and recommendation of the Old Town Local Review Board. Level One projects may be approved by administrative (staff only) review following the Director of Planning's determination to grant a Finding Certifieate of Historical App,vp,;ateness. Typical examples include the following: . Interior ehaBges BF alterations to historic structures; . Re-landscaping around existing structure'; . Re-roofing of an existing building; . Additions and remodels to non-historic single family residences; . Exterior architectural modifications to' an existing commercial, office, or residential building effecting less than 25% of the front or street side exterior facade; . The demolition to non-historic buildings and structures; . New individual signs up to 12 square feet in size; and . Changes in the copy of previously approved signs. The Director of Planning, at his/her tlteiP-sole discretion, may forward Level One projects to the Old Town Local Review Board when unique R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-o596 Supplemental Clean-uplHislortc Property OWner Letter.doc 3 circumstances, or the sensitivity of adjacent historic structures or land' uses indicate the potential for an adverse aesthetic impact. b. Level Two Proiects have the potential for significant aesthetic impacts. Level Two Projects shall always require review by the Old Town Local Review Board prior to action by the approviBg authority. Typical examples of Level Two projects include, but are not limited to, the following: ' . Multi-family residential projects; . New commercial and office projects; . Exterior architectural modifications to an existing commercial, office, or residential building when 25% or more of the front or street side exterior facade is affected; . The alteration to a designated historic structure; . The demolition of, or substantial alteration to, a designated historic structure (requires Planning Commission approval); . New individual signs over 12 square feet; . Mini-monument signs located on architectural features that exceed the standard height requirement of four feet; and, . The removal of a specimen oak tree with a 10 inches or greater trunk diameter. 5. All applications shall be filed 8B the f8FIBS BBd in a manner determined by the Director of Planning. Requests for a Finding of Historic Appropriateness AppIi,,/;.::o,t shall not be accepted unless they are accompanied by the aPl"vp,;ate filing fee and such information and drawings as may be required by the Director of Planning. All applications for Certificates a Finding of Historic Al'p,vp,;ateness shall be signed by either the owner of the property or a person authorized by the owner. All drawings shall be signed by the architect responsible for the design and must be in sufficient detail to show the proposed design for the site. This includes the architectural design and elevations (including signs), proposed materials, textures and colors (including material samples), and the site layout (including all improvements affecting appearances, such as walls, walks, terraces, plantings, accessory buildings, signs, lights, and other similar elements). 6. Following the receipt of a complete application, the Director of Planning shall schedule a meeting of the Old Town Local Review Board within 60 days and provide the Board with a staff report, including a copy of the site plan and elevations. The Board shall review the application material and make a recommendation to approve or deny, with or without conditions, any requests for a Certifieates Finding of Historic Al'l',vl'.:ateness to the approval authority designated by the Development Code. 7. In considering requests ':':.'"..; lB5-for Certifieates a Finding of Historic Apl'.vp.:ateness, the Old Town Local Review Board shall make the following findings: R:IOTSPlPlan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplHistortc Property OWner Letter.doc 4 a. That the proposed structure is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all .applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city and is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. b. That the proposed structure is in confoimance with the requirements of the Old Town Sp~cific Plan, including the goals, objectives and policies, and architectural guidelines and standards. c. In the event of the proposed demolition of a designated historic building or structure, the Board shall also be required to fmd that applicant has submitted substantial evidence that the structure is imminently dangerous or unsafe and that the structure can not be effectively repaired or retrofitted. 8. The expiration date for a CeFtifieatea Finding of Historic App.vp.;ateness shall be the same as expiration date for the accompanying planning application, as may be extended pursuant to the provisions of the Development Code. If the Development Code does not specify an expiration date, the project for which the CeFtifieatea Finding of Historic Appropriateness was approved shall commence construction within three years of the date of approval or the CeFtifieateS Finding of Historic App.vp.;ateness shall become null and void. No extensions of time will be allowed for these projects. G. MAINTENANCE AND CARE 1. The owner, occupant, or other person in actual charge of an building or structure on Temecula Local Historic Register shall keep in good repair all of the exterior portions of such improvement, building, or structure, all of the interior portions thereof when subject to control as specified in the designation statement, and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior architectural feature. 2. Nothing in the requirements of section shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior architectural feature in or on any designated Temecula Local Historic Register building of structure that does not involve a change in design, material, or external appearance thereof. R;IOTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplHistorlc Properly OWner lelter.doc 5 ~. -.-,_.. ---- -.- .. -. H. ADDITIONAL VIOLATION PROVISIONS FOR HISTORIC STRUCTURES 1. In addition to the general violation provisions in Section III.H.7 of ,the Specific Plan, any person who demolishes, alters or removes a building or structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register, that person and the owner shall be required to restore the building, site, or structure to its original condition and setting prior to the violation within ninety days. Any a<;tion to enforce this provision may be brought by the city or any other interested party. This civil remedy shall be in addition to, any criminal prosecution and penalty and any other remedy provided bylaw 2. If any person demolishes or removes lIB building or structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register in violation of this section, no building or construction related (including grading) pennits or pennits to use the !-'.v!-'....;j as a parking area or other commercial venture shall be issued for a period of up to seven years, at the City Council's discretion, based on the significance of the resource from the date of demolition, except to replicate the lost resource. The failure to adequately maintain a designated historic building or structure can also be considered to constitute the unauthorized demolition of a building or structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register. For the purpose ()fthis section, the demolition shall be presumed to have occurred on the date the city has actual knowledge of the demolition. The owner shall have the burden of providing an earlier date, if entitlement to an earlier date is claimed. The owner shall have the affinnative obligations to plant and maintain turf grass, to provide a temporary irrigation system to maintain such landscaping, and te prevent the accumulation of debris and waste on the property during the interim period. " , R:\OTSPlPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplHistonc Property OWner Letter.doc 6 ITEM 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT FROM: Community Services Commission Herman D. Parker, Director of Community service~ March 13, 2006 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Universal Waste Regulations PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Senior Management Analyst . tJl6 RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission receive and file this report regarding the Universal Waste. BACKGROUND: In 2001, the Department of Toxic Substances Control adopted emergency regulations that banned Universal Waste from landfills within the State of California. While this ban took effect immediately for commercial waste the regulations allowed an exemption for household waste until February 8, 2006. Examples of Universal Waste are: . Common household batteries . Fluorescent tubes and bulbs . Electronic devices such as televisions, monitors, radios, microwaves . Mercury gauges, thermometers and novelties . Non-empty aerosol cans. Through the Riverside County Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program, residents can dispose of most of their Universal Waste during these events. In response to these new regulations Temecula Community Services District, has begun a household battery collection program. Collection boxes have been placed at City Hall, Mary Phillips Senior Center, Temecula Community Center (TCC), the Community Recreation Center (CRC) and the County Library. Additional information will be provided in a presentation this evening. R:\SMlTIIB\Trash\Universal Waste Ban\StaffReport ese.doc 31912006 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services March 13, 2006 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Assistant Construction of the Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park (Wolf Creek Sports Complex) continues. Installation of the field lighting, installation of artificial turf fields and parking lot are complete. Construction of the buildings and irrigation systems continue. Construction of the Temecula Public Library project is currently underway. Construction of the retainer walls is complete and the structural steel is nearing completion. Staff continues to meet regularly to discuss furniture selections, information systems needs, etc. Construction ofthe Boys and Girls Club project at Kent Hintergardt Park is currently underway. Standard Pacific has started construction of the parking lot improvements. The Community Services Department released an-RFQ to landscape architect firms for Redhawk Park Improvements for the four Redhawk park sites acquired on June 30,2005 with the annexation of Redhawk into the City of T emecula. The City Council approved a contract with RJM Design to being designing the improvements to the park sites. These improvements include picnic tables, picnic shelters, park benches, sidewalks, tot lots, etc. The Cultural Arts Division is busy preparing for the winter-spring sessions of classes and activities as outlined in the Guide to Leisure Activities. In addition, the Cultural Arts Division is responsible for the day- to-day operations at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater, the History Museum and the Imagination Workshop, Temecula Children's Museum. The Development Services Division continues to participate in the development review for projects within the City including Wolf Creek, Roripaugh and Harveston, as well as overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities, and the contract for refuse and recycling, cable television services and assessment administration. The TCSD Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of all City parks and facilities, and assist in all aspects of Citywide special events, R:\ZIGLERGIXDEPTRP1\2006\0306.doc L The Recreation Division staff is currently programming for the winterlspring classes and activities and special events including the annual Volunteer Recognition event, the Spring Egg Hunt, the Summer Film and Concert series, the 4th of July parade and fireworks extravaganza and many other special events. R:\ZIGLERGIXDEPTRP1\2006\0306.doc