HomeMy WebLinkAbout051706 PC Agenda
..
J!g
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
May 17, 2006 - 6:00 P.M.
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 06-39
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Commissioner Carey
RollCall:
Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you
desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission
Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of April 19, 2006
1.2 Approve the Minutes of May 3, 2006
R\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2006\05- 17 -06.doc
2 Director's Hearina Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for April, 2006
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or
in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an
appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days
after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning
Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
Continued from Apri/19, 2006
3 Plannina Aoolication No. PA05-0390, a Maior Modification. submitted bv Greaorv Islas of
Sian Methods Inc.. to an aporoved Comorehensive Sian Proaram for the Etco Plaza
Buildinas. located at 27270 throuah 27290 Madison Avenue. Christine Damko. Associate
Planner.
New Items
4 PI~nnina Aoolication No. PA06-0034. a Findina of Public Convenience or Necessitv,
submitted bv Orchard's Market. to authorize wine tastina throuah the issuance of a Tvpe-42
license inside their existina store. located at 27473 Ynez Road. Katie Le Comte. Planninq
Technician.
5 Plannina Application No. PA06-0053. a Maior Modification. submitted by Ashbv USA. LLC,
to Conditions of Aoproval for the Tentative Tract Maps. located within Roripauah Ranch at
the future intersections of Murrieta Hot Sprinas Road and Butterfield Staae Road and
NiGholas Road and Butterfield Staae Road. Chervl Kitzerow. Associate Planner.
6 Plannina Aoolication Nos. PA05-0236 and PA05-0235. a Tentative Tract Map and
Develooment Plan. submitted bv Vicki Mata. to create one lot for condo ourooses and
r.on!';truct 110 aae-restricted units on 7.5 acres. located at the northwest corner of Maraarita
Road and Dartolo Road. Harmonv Linton. Assistant Planner.
7 PI~nnina Aoolication No. PA05-0378. a Develooment Plan. submitted bv Matthew Faaan
reoresentina Lennar Homes. for 130 detached sinale-familv homes. located in the
Harveston Soecific Plan. Christine Damko. Associate Planner~
R\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2006\05- 17-06 .doc
2
8 Plannina Apo!ication No. PA06-0037. a Conditional Use Permit and Develooment Plan.
submitted bv David Kniff of KEA Architecture. for a 22.522 s9uare foot. three-story mixed
use commercial/residential buildina consistina of aooroximatelv 4.669 sauare feet of retail
soace and 22 affordable aoartment units. located on the north side of Fifth Street
aooroximatelv 200 feet east of Front Street. Christine Damko. Associate Planner.
9 Plannina Aoolication No. PA06-0048. a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan.
submitted bv James Caooadocia. to construct and ooerate an automobile dealershio
buildina with associated service facilities totaling 32.560 sauare feet on 3.7 acres. located at
the southwest corner of Ynez Road and DLR Drive. Stuart Fisk. Associate Planner.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 6:00 p.m., Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2006\05- 17 -06.doc
3
ITEM #1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 19,2006
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on
Wednesday, April 19, 2006, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners: Carey, Chiniaeff, Harter, Telesio, and Chairman Guerriero.
Absent:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Director's Hearina Case Uodate
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for March, 2006.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar as well as
reagendizing the agenda items. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2 Presentation of Preliminarv Plans for the Civic Center
Providing the Planning Commission with a brief PowerPoint Presentation regarding the first
phase of the Civic Center site plan, Deputy City Manager Thornhill touched on the following:
. Public Opportunities
. Old Town Specific Plan
. Keyser Marston Study
. Opportunities
. Constraints
. Public Parking
. Parks/Open Space/Plazas
C:\Documents and Settings\Denise.Caravelli\Local SeUings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
,
Addressing the Planning Commission's comments, Deputy City Manager Thornhill offered the
following:
. That a world-class architect will be involved in the design work of the future Civic Center
. That it would be hopeful that the first-phase of the Civic Center would be in the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP), and approved by the City Council in 2006
. That the plaza will be designed to accommodate paseos
. That underground parking will be considered for the parking structure
. That utilities will be under grounded in Old Town
. That 350 to 400 parking spaces will be provided in the parking structure, which will be for
employees of the Civic Center and Old Town patrons
. That the future parking structure will be a three-story parking structure, but will appear to
be a two-story structure from the streetscape.
Thanking Deputy City Manager Thornhill for his PowerPoint Presentation, the Planning
Commission expressed its excitement toward the future Civic Center in Old Town.
At this time, public hearing item Nos. 10 and 9 were addressed out of order.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
10 Plannina Application No. PA05-0167. a Develooment Plan. submitted bv Pulte Home
Corporation. for a 21 acre multi-familv housina development consistina of 71 buildinas with a
total of 213 individuallv owned attached triolex units. located near the westerlv end of
Temecula
Senior Planner Papp stated that due to outstanding issues with the Community Services
Division, staff would request that Item No. 10 be continued to the May 3, 2006, Planning
Commission meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to continue Item NO.1 0 to the May 3, 2006, Planning
Commission meeting. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
approval with the exceotion of Commissioner Carey who abstained.
9 Plannina Aoolication No. PA06-0018 and PA06-0019. a Maior Modification to a
Develooment Plan includina the architectural elevations for multi-familv residential
buildinas and retail/office buildinas. submitted bv MDMG. Inc. to reolace two soeculative
buildina Dads with a retail store totalina 17.500 sauare feet. modification of the recreation
center. modification of the residential roof olans and a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-
thru oharmacv. located on Rancho California Road aporoximatelv 300 feet east from
Moraaa Road
Senior Planner Papp provided the Commission with a staff report (of written material), and
advised that since the writing of staff's report, staff has received three letters from residents who
would be in opposition to the proposed project.
Responding to the Planning Commissions queries, Senior Planner Papp noted the following:
. That there would be no Condition of Approval that would prohibit a retail store (Rite Aid)
from having alcohol sales; that the recent changes to the Development Code would
allow retail stores of this nature, throughout the City in Commercial zones, to sell alcohol
without a Conditional Use Permit (CUP); and that staff has insured that all requirements
have been met in order to provide a drive-through pharmacy
. That the size of the proposed Recreation Center was reduced to 3,719 square feet, and
that there will be a separate exercise room which will be an additional 720 square feet
C:\Oocuments and Settings\Oenise.Caravelli\Local Settlngs\Temporary Internet Files\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
2
. That the Planned Development Overlay (PDO), was reviewed by the City Council with
revised elevations that were prepared by the applicant; that the City Council aooroved
the PDO with its revised elevations, with the original Condition of Approval that the
elevations be brought back to the Planning Commission for its consideration
. That grading on the proposed site was dropped by eight-feet
. That there would be an approved and recorded vested map which would show the layout
of the residential and commercial buildings.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's query as to the affect on the Vesting Tentative Tract
Map by modifying the original site plan, City Attorney Thorson advised that the modifications will
not have an impact on the Vesting Map because the map established the parcels, not the
design approval for the site.
City Attorney Thorson concurred with Commissioner Chiniaeff that the modifications will be
completed within the original parcels of the Map; and therefore, the Vesting Map will not be
affected.
Further clarifying, Director of Planning Ubnoske stated that nothing will change with regard to
the Map; and that staff would only be requesting that the Planning Commission look at the
Development Plan.
For informational purposes, City Attorney Thorson stated that what is being requested would be
to change the site plan within the parameters of the PDO.
Referencing comments made by the Planning Commission, Senior Planner Papp stated the
following:
. That the Planned Development Overlay anticipated a child day care center and a
restaurant; that the Rite Aid Drug Store and Pharmacy would be a permitted use in the
use matrix; and that the hours of operation for Rite Aid would be 8:00 a.m. until 10:00
p.m., seven days a week
. That the proposed application would not require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP); and
that therefore, the application would not be subject to a 500-foot separation requirement.
With regard to Condition of Approval No. 74, City Attorney Thorson stated that the condition
would be a standard Condition of Approval (COA) which would impose that the Developer pay
the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMPF); but that it was recently brought to the
attention of staff that due to it being a Vesting Tract Map, the developer may not subject to that
fee; that he would recommend that the Condition of Approval be retained; and that a clause at
the end of Condition of Approval No. 74 be added to state: unless exemot under aoolicable law;
advising that this would allow the City Attorney to further review the condition.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Thanking staff for its efforts with the proposed project, Mr. Larry Markham, representing the
applicant, offered the following information to the Planning Commission:
. That the pharmacy pick-up window would be located at the rear of the Rite Aid building,
away from the street
. That the loading dock will be screened and would not be viewed from the main street
. That the applicant would be in agreement with the added clause to the end of Condition
of Approval No. 74, as requested by City Attorney Thorson
C:\Documents and Settings\Denise.Caravelli\Local Settings\Temporary Internet FHes\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
3
. That the applicant's Vesting Tract Map was approved and recorded; and that the
applicant would be willing to provide to the City Attorney the date of submittal, date
deemed to be complete, and date of approval and recordation
. That the applicant willingly offered to underground all the utility lines in front of the
proposed site, which would enhance the esthetics of the area
. That the architect and representative of Rite Aid would be available for any questions
. That the applicant would be of the opinion that residential elevations would be a
substantial enhancement over what was inherited when MJW Property Group purchased
the property
. That the City Council approved a gas station for the site plan
. That in order to accommodate the Rite Aid from the recorded Vesting Tract Map, the
Rite Aid would require a lot-line adjustment.
Mr. Scott Hanson, Temecula, spoke in favor of the proposed project and suggested that if the
applicant were to raise the roofline, he would be desirous of having the grading lowered.
Relaying her support for the proposed project, Ms. Monica Sams-Oder, representing Mira Lama
and Rancho Apartments, read a letter written by Helen and Bob Oder, whom have requested
that any run-off water from rains, storms, and irrigation, be addressed.
Via overheads, Mr. Robert Oder, representing Mira Lama and Rancho Apartments, spoke highly
of the proposed project, but encouraged that the easement and dedication documents be
addressed.
Addressing a comment made by Mr. Hanson, Mr. Larry Markham stated that the site was
lowered eight feet from the original plan; that two buildings were lowered from two-floors to
three floors, with an additional nine foot plate height; and that if the Planning Commission were
desirous of adding a Condition to confirm Mr. Hanson's concern, the applicant would be willing
to accept such a condition.
By way of photos, Mr. Markham addressed Mr. Oder's concern with regard to easement and
dedication documents; and relayed his willingness to provide staff with record documents from
the adjacent map for review.
Thanking the Planning Commission and staff, Mr. Markham requested the Commission's
consideration of the proposed project.
Commissioner Telesio relayed his support for the proposed project but did express some
concern with the Vesting Tract Map.
Further clarifying Commissioner Telesio's concern with the Vesting Tract Map, City Attorney
Thorson stated that per the Subdivision Map Act Section, when a Map is deemed complete, the
City would be bound at that time, to apply all Laws, Rules, Ordinances, and policies in affect;
that as the Map moves forward, the parcels would be set forth on the Map; and that the
Ordinances and Rules that govern the project would freeze in place; and that the Planning
Commission would not only be vesting the lot-line, but vesting the Ordinances, Policies and
Zoning standards that were in place at the time the map was deemed complete.
For the Planning Commission, Director of Planning Ubnoske requested that the following two
Conditions of Approval be added:
. That under General Conditions -- that the hours of operations for Rite Aid shall be 8:00
a.m. to 10:00 p.m., seven days a week
. That prior to the issuance of a building permit for Rite Aid, a lot-line adjustment shall be
filed and recorded with the City
C:\Documents and Settings\Denise.Caravelli\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7B\041906 (2).doc
4
. That the language: unless exempt under aoolicable law. be added to the end of
Condition of Approval No. 74.
. That the maximum height of any elevation be exactly as was shown in the original
approval.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the
following: That under General Conditions -- that the hours of operations for Rite Aid shall be
8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., seven days a week; that prior to the issuance of a building permit for
Rite Aid, a lot-line adjustment shall be filed and recorded with the City; that the language: unless
exemot under aoolicable law, be added to the end of Condition of Approval No. 74; and that the
maximum height of any elevation be exactly as was shown in the original approval.
Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion. (Additional discussion ensued prior to the
vote; see below.)
Commission Chiniaeff expressed concern with the proposed project, advising that the City
Council has usurped the ability to approve anything; and that he would be of the opinion that the
installation of a Rite Aid, including a drive-through pharmacy would not be compatible with the
nature of the adjacent uses in the area.
At this time, the voice vote of the previously made motion reflected approval, with the
exceotion of Commissioner Chiniaeff who voted No.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-031
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA06-0018 A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN INCLUDING FINAL ARCHITECTURAL
ELEVATIONS FOR THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS AND RETAIL/OFFICE BUILDINGS; REPLACING
TWO SPECULATIVE BUILDING PADS WITH A DRUG-5TORE
TOTALING 17, 500 SQUARE FEET (RITE-AID); MODIFICATION
OF THE RECREATION CENTER, AND MODIFICATION OF THE
ROOF PLANS); AND PA06-0019 A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH PHARMACY
At 7:29 p.m., the Planning Commission took a 10-minute break. At 7:39 p.m., the Planning
Commission resumed to the regularly scheduled agenda.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
New Items
3 Plannina Aoolication No. PA05-0314 a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Public
Convenience or Necessitv Findinas. submitted bv Matthew Faaan. to allow the sale of beer,
wine. and distilled soirits. located on the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas
Road
Assistant Planner Linton provided the Commission with a staff report (of written record), noting
the following:
. That the proposed hours of operation would be 8:00 a.m. to 11 :00 p.m.
C:\Documents and Settings\Denise.Caravelli\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
5
. That the Rancho Temecula Town Center was approved by the City Council with a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP), which would allow for a total of four drive-thru facilities to
be established within the Development Plan; and that per Condition of Approval No.8, if
future tenants were to request the sale of alcohol, a separate Conditional Use Permit
shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission
. That the drive-thru would only be for pharmacy use; and that if it were the desire of the
Planning Commission, staff could add a Conditional of Approval that would state that the
drive-thru would specifically be for pharmacy usage
. That staff would be of the opinion that the AM/PM mini market across the street does not
offer any alcohol sales
. That staff verified that the proposed use would not be closer than 500-feet to Chaparral
High School.
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern with the proposed project's close proximity to
Chaparral High School.
For the Commission, Associate Planner Linton advised that Beverages and More at the Rancho
Temecula Town Center was approved for alcohol sales.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Matthew Fagan, representing the applicant, stated the following:
. That although Chaparral High School would be directly across the street from the
proposed use, it would meet the requirement of 500 feet criteria
. That rigorous Conditions of Approval have been imposed on the project by the City and
Police Department
. That Rite Aid will be imposing a strenuous and focused training program on its
employees with regard to sale of alcohol and tobacco.
Understanding that there would be a fence along the perimeter of Chaparral High School,
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern with the location of sales of alcohol across the
street; and relayed his opinion that the corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road (Rite Aid)
may result in a hangout for teenagers.
Mr. Tobe Koski, District Manager representing Rite Aid Drug Stores, offered the following:
. That the proposed Rite Aid will be using a computer-based training program to train its
employees
. That Rite Aid would also impose a zero tolerance policy with regard to selling of alcohol
to minors.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
Reiterating his concern with the proximity of alcohol sales across the street from the high
school, Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that he would be of the opinion that the sale of alcohol
across the street from any high school should not be permitted.
Understanding that Rite Aid will be imposing a training course with regard to the sale of alcohol
to its employees, Commissioner Telesio stated that it would be his opinion that if any minor was
determined to buy alcohol, a distance of 50Q-feet would not be a deterrent; and that he would
not be opposed to the sale of alcohol, but would strongly encourage a heavy policy if a violation
were to occur.
C:\Documenls and Settings\Denise.Caravelli\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
6
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to approve staff recommendation. This motion died
for lack of a second.
Echoing Commissioner Chiniaeff's concerns, Commissioner Harter would also be of the opinion
that due to the close proximity of the high school, the proposed use would not be an appropriate
location for alcohol sales.
Reiterating his concern with Rite Aid becoming a hangout for teens, Commissioner Carey stated
that he would also be of the opinion that the sale of alcohol in such a close proximity of a high
school would not be appropriate.
Speaking in opposition of the City's over-concentrated liquor licenses, Chairman Guerriero
stated that the location of the proposed use would be a concern, but that he would be willing to
consider approval, if the applicant, would be willing to have the Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC)
perform extensive training for Rite Aid employees.
At this time, the public hearing was re-opened.
Mr. Tobe Koski, representing Rite Aid Stores, stated that not only would Rite Aid employees be
subject to a computer-based training program, but that employees would also be subject to
training videos with regard to ABC laws.
Commissioner Telesio queried on the difference between the proposed site compared to any
other commercial zone.
Referencing Commissioner Telesio's query, City Attorney Thorson informed that when the
proposed project was approved, a requirement was imposed that all uses would need to go
through the Conditional Use Permit process; that regardless of what the general law would be, a
condition was placed that would require the project to have a CUP; and that all concerns
expressed by the Planning Commission may be expressed and implemented through a CUP.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that, in his opinion, Findina of Public Convenience or
Necessitv cannot be made for the following reasons:
. That the proposed uses would not be compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent land uses
. That the proposed use would have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses
. That the proposed use would result in an excessive number of similar establishments in
close proximity.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to deny staff recommendation based on the fact that
a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity cannot be met advising that this would also apply
to the Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion. (Additional
discussion ensued prior to the vote; see below.)
At this time, the public hearing was re-opened.
Requesting a continuance, Mr. Matthew Fagan, stated that a continuation would allow the
applicant and staff time to address the Commission's concerns.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
At this time, the voice vote on the previously made motion reflected approval with the
exceotion of Commissioner Telesio who voted No.
C:\Documents and Settings\Denise.Caravelli\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
7
Per the request of City Attorney Thorson, a roll call vote was taken to deny staff
recommendation:
Commissioner Carey:
Commissioner Chiniaeff:
Chairman Guerriero:
Commissioner Harter:
Commissioner Telesio:
yes to motion
yes to motion
yes to motion
yes to motion
No to motion
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-032
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA-05-0314, A REQUEST FOR A MINOR CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY
FINDINGS TO ALLOW FOR THE SALE OF BEER, WINE, AND
DISTILLED SPIRITS (TYPE 21 LICENSE, OFF-SALE
GENERAL) FROM AN APPROVED 16,836 SQUARE FOOT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO BE LOCATED AT 39782
WINCHESTER ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NO. 920-100-013
4 Plannina Aoolication No. PA06-0011. a Minor Conditional Use Permil. submitted bv Michael
Brewer. to allow for the salp. of beer wine. and distilled soirits. located at 41789 Nicole Lane
Associate Planner Fisk provided the Planning Commission with a staff report (of record).
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Michael Brewer, representing the applicant, thanked staff for its hard work and stated that
the applicant would be in agreement of the Conditions of Approval.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-033
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA06-0011, A REQUEST FOR A MINOR CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE SALE OF BEER, WINE,
AND DISTILLED SPIRITS (TYPE 47 ON-SALE GENERAL -
EATING ESTABLISHMENT FROM AN APPROVED
RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 41789 NICOLE LANE,
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF NICOLE
LANE, APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET SOUTH OF OVERLAND
DRIVE
C:\Documents and Settings\Denise.Caravelli\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
8
5 Plannina Aoplication No. PA05-0004. a Tentative Parcel Map. submitted bv Scott Coooer.
RBF Consultina. to subdivide 17.99 acres 121.22 aross) into six commercial lots. located on
the east side of Ynez Road between Rancho California Road and Solana Wav
Associate Planner Peters provided a staff report (of written material), and noted the following:
. That the Open Space (OS) will be included in the CC&Rs
. That in the near future, a signal will be installed on Rancho Way and Ynez Road, which
will be provided by another project.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Scott Cooper, representing RBF Consulting, noted that the applicant would be in
concurrence with the Conditions of Approval, and would be available for any questions.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-034
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0004, (SELBY) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
32924 AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION TO SUBDIVIDE 21.22 GROSS ACRES INTO
SIZE COMMERCIAL LOTS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
YNEZ ROAD APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET NORTH OF THE
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND YNEZ
ROAD, ACROSS FROM THE TEMECULA AUTO MALL
6 Plannina Aoolication No. PA04-0596. an Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. to
amend mixed-use oroiect reauirements. oreserve existina allevs. add allev auidelines.
modifv sian reaulations and historic oreservation provisions. aenerallv located in and around
Old Town
Associate Planner West presented a staff report (of written material), highlighting on the
following:
. "For Profit" Museums
. Mixed Use Project Requirements
. Expansion of the Historic Preservation Provisions
. Alleys
. Other Clarifications/Changes
In response to questions raised by the Planning Commission, Mr. West noted the following:
. That in-lieu parking fees in Old Town would be for new parking structures or additional
surface parking lots
. That a homeowner desirous of any exterior or interior changes to a historic structure
would need to submit an application through the Planning Department; that the
application would be forwarded to the Old Town Local Review for consideration, to be
followed by the Planning Commission for final approval.
C:\Documents and Settings\Denise.Caravelli\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
9
Helping to clarify historic structures for the Planning Commission, City Attorney Thorson noted
that all historic buildings would be designated on a Historic Register list through the Building and
Safety Department; that no building permits would be issued until the appropriate processes
have been taken; and that homeowners of historic structures would need to disclose any
historical designation or special zoning requirements for the building at the time of sale.
For the Planning Commission, Associate Planner West noted that there would be language in
the Old Town Specific Plan that would impose that if any person were to demolish or remove a
historic structure, in violation of the Historic Register section, no buildings permits would be
allowed for a seven year period.
The following comments were provided by Associate Planner West:
. That mixed-use projects would require one, on-site parking space for each proposed
residential unit
. That staff would also propose, as part of a provision, that if a parking requirement cannot
be met, the applicant may petition the Director of Planning to pay an "in-lieu" parking fee.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Scott Crone, Temecula, thanked staff for its involvement with the future plans of Old Town,
and relayed support of the one-parking space per residential unit requirement with regard to the
types of businesses which would be viable around and adjacent to the future plaza, Mr. Crone
encouraged staff to hold a well-advertised development workshop that would be open to all
citizens of Temecula, advising that this would allow citizens to express what types of businesses
would be viable for the Old Town area.
Mr. Roger Epperson, Temecula, respectfully requested a continuance of Item NO.6 until a
comprehensive plan could be implemented and available for the public for full discussion.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
In response to Mr. Epperson's concerns with regard to parking in Old Town, Director of
Redevelopment Meyer noted the following:
. That for more than a year, staff monitored the parking situation in Old Town; and that a
parking survey was performed
. That currently there would be 1,300 parking spaces in Old town, which would include on-
street public parking, off-street public parking, and off-street private parking
. That the surveys would be performed every three weeks
. That the results of the survey would indicate that significantly less than 50% of the
parking spaces are being utilized
. That since adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan, the City has created 400 off-street
public parking spaces
. That since the opening of the Old Town Temecula Community Theater, parking surveys
have shown that there have not been significant impacts on the parking in Old Town.
Commissioner Telesio queried if there would be an in-lieu fee for future commercial and retail.
For the Planning Commission, Associate Planner West stated that the in-lieu fee would be for
residential component of mixed-use; and that any commercial component with mixed-use would
not have the requirement of an in-lieu fee.
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the City
Council's consideration of expanding an in-lieu fee to future commercial and retail.
Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
C:\Documents and Settings\Denise.Caravelli\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
10
RESOLUTION NO. 06-035
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA-
04-0596 AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AND
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
7 Plannina Aoplication No. PA05-0390. a Maior Modification. submitted bv Grea Iscas of Sian
Methods Inc., to an aooroved Comorehensive Sian Proaram for the Elco Plaza Buildinas.
located at 27270 throuah 27290 Madison Avenue
Associate Planner Damko stated that since the writing of staff's report, the applicant submitted a
revised sign program, advising that staff has not had an opportunity to review the revised
program; and that, therefore, staff would recommend a continuance.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Afshin Etebar, representing ETCO Investments, stated that he would be in agreement of a
continuance.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to continue Item NO.7 to May 17, 2006, Planning
Commission meeting. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
8 Plannina Apolication No. PA05-0294. a Comorehensive Sian Proaram. submitted bv Vail.
Prooerties Butterfield Staae LLC. to construct a 73.306 sauare foot shoooina center that
includes five retail. buil.dinas. located on Hiahwav 79 South between Mahlon Vail and
Butterfield Staae Road
Senior Planner Papp provided a staff report (of record).
Understanding the tenant's need for a 1.5 square foot per linear foot of store frontage,
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested leaving the square footage at 1.5 for future tenants rather
than reverting to the City's Development Code of 1 square foot per linear foot of store frontage.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Jerry Swanger, representing Vail Properties, stated that he would be in concurrence with the
change of Conditions of Approval, and Commissioner Chiniaeff's suggestion of a permanent
square footage of 1.5 square foot per linear foot.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the
requirement of 1.5 square feet per linear foot being kept in place. Commissioner Harter
seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
C:\Documents and Settings\Denise.Caravel1i\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
11
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-036
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0294 A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FOR
THE "BUTTERFIELD STATION" COMMERCIAL SHOPPING
CENTER, (A.P.N.'S 952-200-002, 011, 012, AND 013) LOCATED
ON HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BETWEEN MAHLON VAIL AND
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD
Item Nos. 9 and 10 were Dreviouslv addressed on DaQe 2 - 5
9 Plannina Aoolication No. PA06-0018 and PA06-0019. a Maior Modification to a
Development Plan includina the architectural elevations for multi-familv residential buildinas
and retail/office buildinas. submitted bv MDMG. Inc. to replace two soeculative buildina Dads
with a retail store totalina 17.500 sauare feet. modification of the recreation center.
modification of the residential roof clans and a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru
pharmacv. located on Rancho California Road aooroximatelv 300 feet east from Moraaa
Road
10 Plannina Aoolication No. PA05-0167. a Develooment Plan. submitted bv Pulte Home
COrPoration. for a 21 acre multi-familv housina development consistina of 71 buildinas with a
total of 213 individuallv owned attached triolex units. located near the westerlv end of
Temecula
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
Chairman Guerriero welcomed Commissioner Carey to the Planning Commission.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No additional comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:30 p.m., Chairman Guerriero formally adjourned to Wednesdav. Mav 3. at 6:00 p.m., in the
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Ron Guerriero
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
C:\Documents and Settings\Denise.Caravelli\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK78\041906 (2).doc
12
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 3, 2006
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:03 p.m., on
Wednesday, May 3, 2006, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Harter led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners: Carey, Chiniaeff, Harter, Telesio, and Chairman Guerriero.
Absent:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of April 5, 2006.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exceotion of Chairman
Guerriero who abstained
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2 Review of the 2007-2011 Capitallmorovement Proaram
Principal Planner Brown provided a brief presentation regarding the Capital Improvement
Program.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to receive and file this report.
R\MinutesPCI050306
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM~
Continued from Apri/19, 2006
Commissioner Carey advised that due to a conflict of interest, he would be required to step
down from Item NO.3.
3 Plannina Aoolication No. PAOS-0167. a Develooment Plan. submitted by Pulte Home
Corporation. for a 21 acre multi-familv housina develooment consistina of 71 buildinas with a
total of 213 individuallv owned attached triolex units. located near the westerlv end of
Temecula. Emerv Papo. Senior Planner.
Senior Planner Papp presented the Commission with a staff report (of record), advising that the
Public Works Department requested a revision to Condition of Approval No. 128, which will now
read: Improve Ynez Road along property frontage (Major Highway Standards -100'R1W) to
include installation of match up pavement, curb, and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage
facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Sam Alhadeff, representing Pulte Homes, stated that he would be available for any
questions.
Mr. Ron Roberts, representing Pulte Homes, distributed a PowerPoint Presentation by paper
form.
At this the public hearing was opened, and due to no speakers, it was closed.
The Planning Commissioner's expressed their enthusiasm for the proposed.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the
revision to Public Works Condition of Approval No. 128. Commissioner Telesio seconded the
motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of Commission Carey who
abstained.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-037
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0167 A MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH AND CONSTRUCT 70
RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITH A TOTAL OF 210
INDIVIDUALLY OWNED ATTACHED (TRIPLEX) UNITS ON
APPROXIMATELY 21 VACANT ACRES IN PLANNING AREAS
4/5, 6 AND 7 OF THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN,
ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS
944330001,944330003 AND 944330017 (PA05-0167)
At this time, Commissioner Carey returned to the dais.
R\MinutesPCI050306
2
New Items
4 Plannina Aoolication No. PA05-0096. a OevelOl;lment Plan. submitted bv Andrew Kiellbera
of McArdle Associates. for the construction of four sinale stor:v industrial buildinas totalinq
54504 SQuare feet. located on the south side of Winchester Road. west of the Diaz Road
and Winchester Road intersection
Associate Planner Oamko provided the Planning Commission with a staff report (of record).
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Andrew Kjellberg, representing Mc Ardle Architects, stated that he would be available for
any questions.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
In response to Commissioner Carey's query, Associated Planner Damko advised that the
surrounding buildings would be concrete tilt-up and would be similar to the proposed project.
Planning Director Ubnoske noted that staff would request a Condition of Approval that would
include reciprocal parking.
The applicant noted that he would be in agreement of adding of condition for reciprocal parking.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the
added condition with regard to reciprocal parking. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion
and voice vote reflected unanimous aooroval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-038
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0096 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT PROPOSES
TO CONSTRUCT FOUR SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL
BUILDINGS (WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE) TOTALING 54,504
SQUARE FEET LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD APPROXIMATELY 170 FEET WEST OF
DIAZ ROAD IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (L1) ZONE
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
A. Commending staff for its PowerPoint Presentation, Commissioner Chiniaeff encouraged
staff to put the agenda packet on CD, rather that the large binders, advising that it would make
for easier reading. Commissioner Chiniaeff also requested that agenda items be more specific
with regard to location of projects.
B. Commissioner Carey also commended staff for its staff's PowerPoint Presentations.
C. Expressing his appreciation for PowerPoint Presentation, Commissioner Telesio advised
staff to keep up the good work.
R\MinutesPCI050306
3
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Thanking the Planning Commission for its comments with regard to PowerPoint, Director of
Planning Ubnoske noted that staff has been working hard to improve staff's reports. For the
Commission, MS.Ubnoske distributed a brochure with regard to training opportunities.
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:40 p.m., Chairman Guerriero formally adjourned to Wednesdav. Mav 17. at 6:00 p.m., in
the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Ron Guerriero
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
R:lMinulesPCl050306
4
ITEM #2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
May 17, 2006
Director's Hearing Case Update
Planning Director's Agenda items for April 2006.
Date
April 6, 2006
April 6, 2006
April 27, 2006
Attachment:
Case No.
PA06-0020
PA06-0021
PAOS-0304
Proposal
A Minor Conditional Use Permit to
establish and operate a rental car
agency within an existing retail
commercial suite, located at 27645
Jefferson Avenue, Suite 113
A Minor Conditional Use Permit to
establish and operate a rental car
agency within an existing hotel,
located at 29345 Rancho
California Road
A request for a fifth and final
Extension of Time for Tentative
Parcel Map No. 28049, located on
the west side of Pujol Street,
approximately 2,200 feet south of
First Street
1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 2
R:\DIRHEAR\MEM0\2006\05-17 -2006.doc
Applicant
Karl Huy, RHL
Design Group, Inc.
Karl Huy, RHL
Design Group, Inc
Jack E. Robson,
Cornerstone
Temecula L.P.
Action
APPROVED
APPROVED
APPROVED
R:\DIRHEAR\MEM0\2U06\D5-l7 -2006.doc
ATTACHMENT NO.1
ACTION AGENDA
2
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
April 6, 2006 1 :30 p.m.
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
Item No.1
Project Information
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
Location:
Environmental Action:
Project Planner:
ACTION:
Item No.2
Project Information
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
Location:
Environmental Action:
Project Planner:
ACTION:
1 :30 p.m.
PA06-0020
Minor Conditional Use Permit
Budget Rental Car
Karl Huy, RHL Design Group, Inc.
To establish and operate a rental car agency within an existing retail
commercial suite.
27645 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 113
Categorically Exempt from further environmental review per CEOA
Section 15301, Existing Structure, Class 1
Knute Noland
APPROVED
PA06-0021
Minor Conditional Use Permit
Avis Rental
Karl Huy, RHL Design Group, Inc.
To establish and operate a rental car agency within an existing hotel..
29345 Rancho California Road
Categorically Exempt from further environmental review per CEOA
Section 15301, Existing Structure, Class 1
Knute Noland
APPROVED
R:\DIRHEAR\Agendas\2006\04-06-06 Action Agenda.doc
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
April 27, 2006 1:30 p.m.
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a
white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner.
Item No.1
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
Project Information
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
Location:
Environmental Action:
Project Planner:
ACTION:
1 :30 p.m.
PA05-0304
Tentative Parcel Map Final Extension of Time
Pujol Street Condos
Jack E. Robson, Cornerstone Temecula L.P.
A request for a fifth and final one-year Extension of Time for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 28049.
West side of Pujol Street, approximately 2,200 feet south of First
Street
Categorically Exempt per CEQA Section 15315, Class 15, Minor
Land Divisions
Stuart Fisk
APPROVED
R:\DIRHEAR\Agendas\2006\04-27-06 Action Agenda.doc
ITEM #3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Planning Commission
Christine Damko, Associate Planner
May 17, 2006
SUBJECT:
Planning Application No. PA05-0390 (Etco Plaza Sign Program Modifications)
At the April 19, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing, staff requested that the Etco Plaza Sign
Program Modification application be continued because the applicant submitted additional
changes to the program the day before the hearing. Staff did not have adequate time to review
these changes and therefore requested a continuance.
The table below subsequent changes the applicant has made to the proposed Sign Program
modifications, as well as, to the original sign program. Staff has determined that the proposed
modifications are consistent with the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines. The
modifications will not increase the amount of signage proposed for the building nor the size of
font or maximum sign area. The modifications propose to increase the color palette by seven
colors, permit logos, and add second floor signage to Building 2. Staff supports the
modifications to the Sign Program because they will not adversely affect the surrounding
development and land uses or obscure adjacent approved signs.
Existing Program
Prohibits logos
Color palette consists of off-
whites, tan, amber, and bronze
colors
Required font type: Futura
Heavy BT
Maximum copy size is four feet
for primary tenants
Maximum copy size is four feet
for secondary tenant signs
Maximum wall sign square
footage allowed is 3D feet
Original Proposed Changes
to Proqram
Allows logos to be added
within sign fascias
Increase approved color
palette significantly
Allows the type of font to be
determined by the Landlord
and the Citv
Increase maximum stacked
copy height to five feet for
primary signs
Increase maximum stacked
copy height for secondary
tenant sign to six feet
Increase secondary tenant
signage maximum square feet
to 50 feet
Revised Changes to Program
In addition to proposed
changes, logo cannot exceed
36" X 36"
Reduce choices to seven
additional colors: White,
Burgundy, Red, Emerald Green,
Blue. Intense Blue. and Black
Allows the type of font to be
determined by the Landlord and
the Citv
No changes to the original sign
program provided that logos (if
any) are excluded from the
maximum CODY heiClht
No changes to the original sign
program provided that logos (if
any) are excluded from the
maximum co~v heiqht
No changes to the original sign
program provided that logos (if
any) are excluded from the
maximum square footage
calculation
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\MEMO to PC.doc
1
Staff Recommendation
Staff supports revision
Staff supports revision
Staff supports revision
Staff supports revision
Staff supports revision
Staff supports revision
Existing Program
Second Floor Tenant Sign:
These signs are to identify a
single second-story tenant that
occupies at least 50 percent of
second floor
WS-2a (Second Floor Tenant
Sign): One sign located on the
second story under the arch of
the east and west side of the
buildings to identify a single-
second story tenant that
occupies at least 50 percent of
the second floor
WS-2b (Ground Floor Tenant
Sign): One secondary sign for
the east and west elevation
(one each) is allowed for each
tenant occupying two or more
ground floor tenant spaces
No freeway sign age proposed
The quantity of wall signs shall
not exceed eleven for each
building
No neon and L.ED. permitted
Signage must be located within
the architectural banding
RECOMMENDATION
Original Proposed Changes
to Pro!!"am
Second Floor Tenant Sign:
These signs are to identify a
single second-story tenant
that occupies at least 50
percent of second floor, or
othelWise approved by
Landlord and Gi""
Tenant Sign (Refer to Exhibit
A-WS-2 (a,b)
Maximum of 2 WS-1 sign per
building
Maximum of one WS-1 sign
per building
Maximum of ten WS-2 signs
per building
Maximum of five WS-2 signs
per building
Proposed freeway sign age on
exhibit A (no additional
information provided)
The quantity of wall signs
shall not exceed twelve for
each building
Allow neon and L.ED.
Eliminates language on how
signage must be iocated
within Ihe architectural
bandino
Revised Changes to Program
Building 2 (facing Madison Ave
only) shall allow 2 second floor
tenant signs. See exhibit EE
No changes to approved
program except:
Buildino 2 WS-2a (facing
Madison Ave only): Shall allow
two second floor tenant signs.
See exhibit G
Eliminated proposed changes
The quantity of wall signs shall
not exceed twelve for each
building
Allow back lit neon halo
illumination (per approved
program) Allow L.ED. lighting
for illuminati no of 10005 onlv
Eliminated proposed changes
Staff Recommendation
Staff supports revision
Staff supports revision
Staff supports revision
Staff supports revision.
The originally approved
program illustrated 12
signs but the text limited
the program to 11. This
revision will correct the
error
Staff supports revision
Staff supports revision
Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan,
Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. The
proposed sign program modifications incorporate common design elements such as materials
and illumination that is seen throughout the City. In addition, the proposed program will not
adversely affect the surrounding development and land uses or obscure adjacent approved
signs. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Planning Application
No. PA05-0390.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Revised Sign Program - Blue Page 3
2 PC Resolution 06-_ - Blue Page 4
3. April 19, 2006 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 5
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Elco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\MEMO to PC.doc
2
ATTACHMENT NO.1
REVISED SIGN PROGRAM
G:\PJanning\2005\PAOS-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Aevision\Planning\MEMO to PC.doc
3
Sien
proeram
ET(O
Plaza
MADISON AVENUE AND SANBORN ROAD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
Prepared For'
ETCO Investments, LLC
9952 SOUTH SANTA MONICA BLVD SUITE 200
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212
Prepared By'
<:!;Mi'
~IGN METHODS INC.
Electrical Signs And Neon
1749 28th Street
Signal Hili CA 90755
June 26, 2003
Revision November 20, 2005
April,17,2006
Sign Criteria
Subject
ET(O PLAZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Page
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Rood
Temeculo, CA
Guidelines, Directory, ond Vendors
Purpose and Intent 2
General Landlord / Tenant Requirements 2
General Specifications
Prohibited Signs
Sign Types
Graphic Exhibits
Site Pion
Building 1 All Elevations
Building 2 All Elevations
Wall Signs (Primary Tenants)
Wall Signs (Secondary Tenants)
Building #2 Exception
Building Address Numbers
Multi-Tenant Monument
Signage Color Specifications
Signage Detail Specifications
2
3
3
Date:
Ape;l II, 2002
Revisions:
A
B
C
LlJ;:J;U 0
I..t.:I::J2:j E
~ E E
IL:J.:.lo.I F
I.l.I..I:.l.U G
.. H
..
Apnl 25, 2002
May 13. 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14 2002
JUClC 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
JeJlluary 23. 2003
March 24, 2003
AfJIII 24. 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26. 2003
November 1,2005
diM'"
SIGN METHODS INC.
Ele~lrlcal Signs And Nean
1749 E. 28th 51.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655.4336
Fo" (562) 427.6875
www.signrnethods.com
N D E X
SIGN GUIDELINES, DIRECTORY AND VENDORS
A SIGN GUIDELINES
MANUFACTURE: All signs must be U.l. Approved ond
conform to the Electrical code and ony municipal building
codes.
COLORS & FINISHES: Colors and \inishes must be 01 highest
quality over properly primed surfoces and are subject to
owner approval.
INTERIOR SIGNS: Interior signs may not be visible from a
public street and ore not regulated by this progrom unless
they are pertinent to or ottached to 0 window.
REQUIRED SIGNS Tenont is required to prOVide and
maintain in good condition at least one wall sign and suite
identification sign in conformance with this program during
the term of tenant's lease.
B. DIRECTORY
PROJECT
ETCO Plaza
Madison Avenue & Sanborn Road
Temeculo CA
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
ETCO Investments, LLC
9952 SOUTH SANTA MONICA BLVD SUITE 200
BEVERLY HILLS CA. 90212
1310)691.5500 Phone (3101282.8193 Fa,
ARCHITECT:
Konrad Rieger and Associates
40440 Carmelito Circle
Temecula CA 92591
(909) 676.3759 Phane/Fo,
SIGN DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR:
Sign Methods, Inc
1749 28th Street
Signal Hili, CA 90806
(562) 989.5755 Phone 1714) 427.6875 Fa,
Contact: Jim Bros, Greg Islos
714-925-7205 phone, fox 714.546-8647
C APPROVED VENDORS
1:1[0 PLAU
SIGN PROGRAM
C!iMi"'
Sign Methods, Inc.
1749 28th Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755 Phone
(714) 427.6875 Fo,
Contact: Jim Bras, Greg Islos
714.925.7205
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Terneculo, CA
Date:
April II, 2002
Revisions:
A~.,,;I 25, 2002
MClY 13, 2002
Moy 22, 2002
Ju\~e "\4.1002
June 20, 2002
Jlrne 27 2002
JorlVory 23, 20U3
MOf(h 24, '2003
April 24. 2003
June 10, 2003
JUlle 26 2003
November 1, 2005
<1;Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
EleClrlcQI Signs And Neon
1749 E 28th 5t.
Signol Hill, CA 90755
1562) 989.5755
(800) 655-'336
Fm: (562) 427.6875
www.signmelhoch.com
~
~
Pog e
A. PURPOSE AND INTENT
The purpose of this sign program is to ensure that the
signage in ETCO Plaza reflects the integriiy and overall
aesthetic values of the Landlord and the CI1y of Temeculo.
Conformity with this program will be strictly enforced, anu
any non-conforming signs will be removed by the Landlord at
the expense of the tenant.
B GENERAL LANDLORD I TENANT REQUIREMENTS
Prior 10 manufacture of any sign in the Plaza, the Tenant shall
submit to landlord for written approval, two copies detailed
drawings. These drawings shall include the building elevation
to which the Signs ore to be attached, sign dimensions,
graphics.. location, colors, and method of attachment This
approval must be obtained prior to submilallo the City of
Temeculo.
2. All signs sholl be reviewed for conforrnance with this criteria
and overall design quality, Approval 01 disapproval of sign
submitols based on aesthetics of design sholl remoin the sole
right of the Landlord.
3. Pr;or to the ;nstoll ond monufacture of any s'gn, the Tenant
sholl obtOln 0 sign permit from the City of Telllecula
4 The tenant shall pay for all signs, related matenals, and
ir.stollotlon fees (ir.cludir.g finallnspec1ion COS15)
5. Tenant foscia signs will comply to all I'equirements of thi~
plan.
Logos, (not to exceed 36"x36" square) and colors 10 be
approved by landlord, and City of
Temeculo.
6. It is the responsibility of the tenant's sign company to verily 011
conduit and transformer locations and service access prior to
fabrication.
7
In the event a tenant vacates his premise, it is his
responsibility to patch all holes and point surface(s) to match
existing color of fascia. In addition, the tenant shall provide
o blank pone! for any freestanding sigrl he occupies.
8
Landlord reserves the right to periodically hire on independent
electrical engineer, at Tenant's soie expense, to inspect the
installation of 011 Tenant's signs_ Tenants will be required to
hove any disuepancles and/or code violations corrected at
Tenont's expense Any code vio'lotions, requesls for sign
removals, or discr'epancies not corrected wilhin fifteen (15)
doys of notice, 11l(IY be correcteu by the Londlord at Tenant's
expense,
9, All tenant signs sholl be installed after city permits are
secured.
10 Cooperative tenanl advertising, signing or seasonal event
signing will require 0 special event sign permit from the
Ci1y of Temecula.
C. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
Sign sizes shall be limited to moximum widths shown on
tenont's elevation, and olso sholl not exceed the general
sizes outlined"
2.
Signs sholl be fabricated per the specifications shown
3
All signs and their ins1allation shall comply with 011 local
building and electrical codes.
4
All electrical signs will be fabricated by a U.L. approved
sign company. according to U.L. specifications
5
Sign company to be fully licensed with the city and state
and sholl hove full workman's compensation and general
liability insurance.
6
,6,11 penetrations of exterior fasCio ore to be sealed alrtlgh1
\color and finish to be approved by landlord and City)
All conduits, transformers, junction boxes and openings In
budding surfaces sholl be concealed. Exposed hardware
shall be finished in 0 manner consistent with quality
fabrication practices. No exposed raceways will be
allowed,
8
Signs sholl be placed in locations os shown on elevations
with landlord approval.
9.
All signs shall hove its sign permit number, nome of
fabricator, dote 01 installation and voltage In a visible
location.
10
Any tenant sign left thirty (30) doys after vacating premises
sholl become the property of the landlord unless previous
arrangements hove been agreed upon by landlord and
tenont.
EHO PIAU
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Rood
Temecula, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
>\'p,,1 25, 2002
/I.\(]i' 13,2002
!\:\(J~ 22, 2002
Ju",c 14 ?002
j"rlC '10' 2002
jVrll'" 2/ '1002
jarwwy 2'3, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
Jwne 10, 2003
June 26 2003
r'<loven,bel' 1, 2005
diMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
EledT;u,1 S;9n~ And Neon
1749 E. 28th 51.
S;gnal H;lI, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655.4336
fa" (562) 427.6875
www.signmethods.com
Sign Criteria
Sections A, 8, & C
Page 2
D PROHIBITED SIGNS
Sinn>:; lnndihJtinn C1 Trnffir Hmnrn
No person shall install or maintain, or couse to be
installed or maintained, any sign which simulates or
imitates in size, color, lettering or design any traffic
sign or signal, or which makes use of the words
"STOP", "LOOK", "DANGER" or any other words,
phrases, symbols or characters in such 0 manner os to
interfere with, mislead, or confuse traffic.
2
S.igns_io...J.LQ2~.imitv to lWl.i.tt.--'j.DJ~_~
Signs which have less horizontal or vertical clearance
fmm authorized communication or energized electrical
power lines than are prescribed by the Lows of the
State of California are prohibited.
3
Painted If!ttF!(<; wiILQ.9.Lb.jLR~nnllt~.dc.
4
Co hi np.t If! ()lJ fA <;r~D.Lill.I,!Dli.o_g.LEi(L~LgD_LW.aj HQ.L.Ql;.
nllowF'rl
5
Metnl fncprl rrJ h i nel2ig.tJ.L(\,;2~I=~pl~QLpa rt --9.1. QJ9.9.Q}
no' nmhihitpfi
6
Fxtprnnllv illllminntpr1 "inns nrp nrnhihitpr1
7
Tj)~re sholl Q~L!lQ_l.QOftQP--.;;i9.D2",
8
Thp.rp. shnll hI'> nn fln<;hin(J.I.~lIlnvinn nr (lIIr!ihlp <:igm..
9
Sinn" rn'Js.Lb..e.~Q.Lcbite(turalbt-CQJl}.patib!.e: with the entire
center and receive approval of landlord and city
zoning, plal,ning and building departments.
10
No _~ "hnll :,r,,~prt ,.,hm,p lh!LQP..PJ.QI{@.d sign
envso!.Qp.~"
II
Vphirlp Sinnc:
Signs on or affixed to trucks, automobiles, trailers, or
other vehicles which advertise, identdy, or provide
direction to a use or activity not related to its lawful
activity ore prohibited.
12
L Igh.t._B_oJb_StrjIl9.'
External displays, other than temporary decorative
holiday lighting which consists of unshielded light bulbs
ore prohibited. An exception hereto may be granted
by the landlord when the display is an integral part of
the design character of the activity to which it relates.
13. Rillhnnrr! Sinnc: no' nnt nprrnittprl
14 Thp lJSP. nf n nprrnnnpnt sole sinn is nrnhihitp.rl
The temporary use of these signs is limited to a thirty (30) day period
and is restricted to signs (affixed to the interior of windows) which do
not occupy more than twenty (20) percent of their respective window
area. Each business is permitted 0 total of not more than ninety (90)
days' of temporary signs per calendar yeOl".
E. SIGN TYPES
WAil SIGNS
lUG_"'- TYPJ.'N_S,,_L(l'rl!)1arv T"ngn.t.~!1)
Sign area not to exceed 87.5 square feet. Sign fabrication, design,
and placement is outlined in Exhibit 'D' Qllnntitv Ann Inr.;.Q.liQ..o..;
MaXimum of one sign located on the East elevation ond one on the
West elevation. Single-line or stocked copy is permitted. If tenont
displays two signs, second sign must be identical to first
SI~N TYI'~_.w.S- 2(g,.b).J.Se~gn.d.pn...Sign)
Each secondary sign is not to exceed 300 square feet in area. Sign
fabrication, design, and placement is outlined in Exhibit 'E'
W5-2A Exception: Building #2 (facing Madison Ave. only)
Shall allow (2) two second floor WS,2 tenant signs. See Exhibit EE
Qunntitv Anrl Lorntinn.
.
Sign Type WS-2a (Second Floor Tenant Sign) One secondory
sign located on the second story under the arch of the East and West
elevations of Building 1 ,2,
_Fx,pntinn: Building #2 (facing Madison Ave. Only) Sholl allow (2 )
two second floor WS-2 tenant signs. See Exhibit EE. These signs ore
to identify 0 single second-story tenant that occupies at least 50% of
second floor, or otherwise approved by Landlord, and City.
.
Sign Type WS-2b (Ground Floor Tenant Sign) One secondary
tenont sign on the ground floor of the East elevation and one
secondary tenant sign on the ground floor of the West elevation is
allowed for each tenant. See elevations for acceptable locations for
this type of sign.
2 GB.o.Ul'!1L:;!.GJJ:;
~IGN TYPE MON (MULTI.TENANT MONUMENT SIGN'
Two (2) monument signs, as shown in Exhibit 'G', to be located as
shown on the Site Plan.
EHO PUlA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Roou
Telllecula, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 2:', 2002
JanuOl)' 23, 2003
Morch 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
(f;Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Electrical Signs And Neon.
1749 E 28th St
Signol Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655.4336
Fo^, (5621 427.6875
www.signmethods com
Sign Criteria
Secllons 0 & E
Page 3
SirE PVr~
~CALE 1 -10
f'RC'),,-j
(~
;,(l:1111
I I
I
I
.)
~I r E P 0 r i'l I E
15
II
i
,j
iJ
~:!I
~-.!!!I
~~
~-.!!!I
~'l 11,..1 ~.. ,'." .'.'i"._.'.~,.,':-~.. r-, ~.-J .., [..~I..~.. C'mrlr;e CD ,
,'.' , .. ' . .' ...L:l... '. ",I..'11"'1r-'" ,I r:":tI-l-iJ ,-
-~~ tr L~' -~~- '.. ""F~-d::,,,L_C_~'_._.L r-""~.' . -'~ ~. ~ t ' .~~, ~~
I~" -'~ ,W:",C~'.-~- -,"/. '\~:.~./~1'!;.:-;., I.":~.C." ,:-,-,/"",;}\,~~ '.'~-.~~~l H .~~... --'~i
'!., ---u.ru Htl -!It- .; \, '. '. ,':'.:.;L. ''-.'''''. ".'" ,.,01 _ '-'f'J.J. iTIi I' '.. r- -'J
':f:' ,=I.~ +,~~ID); m~:;,' . r t-l
Ci] BUILDING 1 ' V'<;.~;r . ,''CO,",, I .. [? j
.-+.l~ . II ~;~! II I I! ~
I LJ- L . ----. .....1. . In, l-,-d'T ~~-,---._JI ~ _ _-.1 j. I 1
, ~ 1 : ..1 r;' I';',i:c.!~., f,",:! fi-1 ~
J~,.~;~E:,I "!_)~~I~~~i~~~c~~;~_~cj~li
r;e'1 ' I ' , ii' wi . I i I -,
\. \__, i;',1 >...' ,--.J I '.' ._..;
'if
fi
(:1
,I'""
I~I
~,q
;~,w
IWS-'.!
rwS~
iWs.2al
~
SeelEfhlbit EE
[Ws:J1
('l
~il
Ii
),
ri
('\
JF
~'\
~..').y
,.'"-'
~
,v, i\ 11 I S U t,1
V f t-; I,ll'
SIGN LEGEND
SI..nTyp.,W"_:Z", (5..<.......,.....
~~n~~',~:';';~),'.:.'," , 'I'
i"",.
~ P"".~"e',i' :!,,,,,,,,,,T,,,"",>Y_.II:""OI'
~-;,,,,,,>",,W,}!,,,,,',u"'-"""""'.'M;'""''''-'''''''
~"'N\ fC~ IlI.JILl)I~I(;"
S ("",,," lbo, "[1'" ',V,.l~
::<'0"011"",,,;,,,,\'1,""
"..,,, II.,~. >",n, 1'1', I
'1("',;f('JH;:IJILlW'IC.'?
'."
""'1',..,.,..1 f
r:ll!l:I
~-~dd'o"'I"".b'"
~ 1M",,,",",,,,
Ground Floor Tenant Sign. Po",b'oLo<ot"."
G,--,I,
'""''''"c,'
.1",
EnD PUlA
SIGN PROGRAM
LDcatiDn:
Mod'SOrl Avenue ond
Sanborn Road
Tem\Jcula. CA
Date:
Apld 11, 2002
Revisions:
b,
April 25, 7002
Mny 13, 2002
.....1Cly 22, 20m
JUlie 1 ~ 2002
JUI1,,20 2002
JUlIC 2/, 2002
JU"""ly23,2003
Mot(.h ':/.1, 2003
Aptll 2~, 2003
)lJnclO,2003
J"ne26,2003
aM!
SIGN METHODS INC.
~1.rf,kGI ~Ivn. And N~G"
1)'9 E.
Signal
9 0
(5621
281h SI.
Hilli CA
7 S 5
989.5755
SITE PLAN
b:hibit A
T
~
Ar ._-~J;t":::!
~-~
--.......
.t
!~UILDING 1. FAST ElEVATION (1.15)
WALL SIGN SCHEDULE:
The quontiry of wall ~igns (011 types listed below)
sholl nol exceed twelve (12) for each building
I WS-2a I
~S:!J
1 W5-1 I Primary TenClnl Sign
'-"'e W~ I "u', I~",,"u ''', '1.0 l,,, ":'_'"
,Ih... Wee' """"''''~
~ ........
IWS-2al hcand Floor Tenant Sign
, t,," '~'.'j'''''''' "," "" ~h.d ",', ,.," ,,,r'.>,,,' "'''j
,.I, II, ,,,,I, -.1 "~"~, ,,,,,I """ W,o,_
.,11."1,,,
t,,,
0"""''''''-
~ Ground flDor Tenanl Sign
(;~e ,eoundo'j 'e""'" >'g" <>" Ihc ~r<"""i .j<:.o, ~I
,I,,, L",' .I~'",II"" ""ri @c "("""d("I,~",,,,1 ',;y"
,,,' '''C ~<c""d I!.oor of I,,,, 'No" d",otio,"" "ilo,'od
~~~~',~;~~'_:r.::"~~'nj:~~' n,u>j be lo"""d w,"I,,,, ,i",
EiUIl.DING 1 - WE:;T ELEVATION (MADISON AVENUE)
.
---
,.
~........._..
II
.-;--.
~I~r
fl
Ii--=:Jj
1-
I~
I-
I-
II
..
. '.!'lllA,1 H.'!
I ~ -'w"'..'
BUILlJlNG . ~OUTH El EVATIO~~ rlN] '=C)U~~TY'\I<[);
I:LlIl[,ING I r,n,:rH [LEv;\TIOr'.J ILuA[JII\JG AREAl
EUO PUZi\
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Rood
Temeculo, CA
Date:
April II, 2002
Revisions:
Ap..1 2:', 2002
May 13 2002
May 22 2007
June 1,j 2002
June 20, 200L
June 27, 2002
Januory 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
AI'"I 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
r..Jovember 1, 2005
C5Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Eledrical Signs And Neon
1749 E. 28th St
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989.5755
(800) 655.4336
fa" (562) 427-6875
www signmethods com
SCAl[, 1.'32" I' 0'
BUILDING 1
All Elevations
Exhibit B
I WS~2a I
---
T
......,~
-.,.,
it
61 IILDING 2 . EA.~T ELEVATION (I 151
~-~
See Ex eption
EXHIIITEE
BUilDING 2 'N[ST HEvATION 1I.,\A[)I$UN I'V\~~lU[1
.
--
~
~KI~TIIU\~T ([,['I
115VII;wI
BLJILUINC, 2 - NOkTH ELEVATION liNT. [UURTYARI)i
WALL SIGN SCHEDULE:
The quantity af wall signs (011 types listed below)
shall not exceed twelve (12) for each building
IWS-2a I
I WS~ 1 I Primary Ten~"'1 5ign
(j"" n,.1 ,'~r Iv~"'''ci or. Ih< I;~,I ,_,<vcd,,,,,
,J ,,"e ".. ,I,,, 'I/o,' ol~,,,"''''
IWS-2al
5e~ond Flo<lr Tenanl 51gn
'.i',,' .0;;"".1"", ,,1""'''','01 "n 1"0 "."",.! ,.~"
,nJe' 'h~ ,,,.:" ~.f .~,~ l~.. ,,,d '~,~" ~I""u,;"",
"te,,,ld"",:!
f'j;~~",'" r.ula"". ,,'; I'n,-,,,.., Mud,;"" ",'e. ('nil
SI,~1I ~llo'" 1211"" '''''>'''' II"", lo'nOll' "g",
"ohh.b"EE
Iho,. '''In, ""lo,d.n"r, ""ngl,>,c,ood.,.I'.,,-.,
'"""'" ",,,. vav",~, ," le~,,' -"0-;.(, Qf "''-Oil'' "r'~,
~,h.',"'-"" "I>~,,'v<d b'f '"odl(l,d o~d ell
~
Ground FloGr TenGnl SIgn
'_M "'or,u~". 'e"o~1 .,~" '-',' 'he Q,"""J ',,,'0' ~I
II," [0>1 <I"'~"ur. ~"C Me ,".<md",,! le"~"1 ,.""
,,', II," y,,,,,t,d 'iou' ul '''t, VI." .1"v~I,,'n " oiln'~&d
I~, ""C', '"',~'" "''J'" '''v.1 ~" ir,{~t.." ",.h,n ''', ,,,,.1,.-,,,, '0'"
o
JjinDF
_?
''::1..-
.......
,.
~~~_,i!b'
BI.IILull'-JG L' SUUlH ELEVATIUN ILOADING AREA)
Eno PUZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Rood
Temeculo, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
Apr.1 "Lo, "LUUl
May 13, 2002
Moy 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
,'unc 2;', 2002
Janua'y 23, 2003
Murch 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
~iiMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Ele<;Irlcol Slgn5 And Neon
749 E 281h 51
Signal Hill, CA 90755
[562) 989.5755
(8001 655.4336
Fa, [562) 427.6875
www signmethaJs calTl
SCALE 1/32" I 0
BUILDING 2
All Elevations
Exhibit C
I
4.0'
,~\CJ^ SIQ~~('U
Copy
Het~lhl
~
I,-j(" SO'oaf\Vcdl I',,',drh
-,-
2.6'
M".
letler HI
r'[\,:
~;'<f""" 1\,
......t
t:.LJ
il' ';
i""
..L__
Lc f-==
~I
k~
!~:'J
'- !
r~'
I
r.;',...:.;.-J
\"'" 'l
I,:,,'C.~.I
,< !
SIGN TYPE l:ilJl]
PRIMARY TENANT WALL SIGN - MAX. 875 SQUARE FEET
FOIJT AS APPROVED fl.Y LANDLORD AI'ID CITY
fA!NLCQ~.QjLShtJ~J}l"ILE
EHO PUZll
B1; Fwze<l 8730W"Loggio" (oH.whi:e)
82; Frrw",,8732W"Fronli\'rTol1'(lighllanl
Al i FrOlee 7783M "Too,led Torr' (ton)
._""! FrOlp.e lJ734M "Borf Mulch"\cloV)
IE!I Frazee 87350 'Wild CounUy" (row vml)er)
~1Color,lobedelerminedQndapPlovedbyCil'l
ISee bhib.1 H:,
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
SPEnFIf'ATIQ,btS.. Individual reverse-pan cflOnnelletters,fobricoted from .063 aluminum with .090 aluminum faces. Return
depth to be three (3) inches. Ex1ellor to be fJoinred using outomotive enamel 111 color noted in schedule, Internol neon, No
decoration 01 d1CJnnelle!ler loce IS permitted Logos moy not exceed 36"x36" and will be excluded from the maximum sq, Ft.
Calculation ond moy be illumllloted with neon or LED lighting. Otherwise Letter styles. Colors, and use of Logos ore sublect to
Landlord ond City opproval.
-- SIGN TYl'f [iNs.f!
/~(TYP" Plocem~;~tV(lri~$1
11;'t'\
It
Date:
April II, 2002
Revisions:
irm'.-if.i II.
' 'II
. "
.- j,
1~__ '~~
X Xi'
j-11u1-.-r
/ Xl
"-. r
,,__I
I I [I
I I r-
=LII
April 2:;, 20U2
1"lay 13 2002
Mov 22, 2002
Jvrle 14. 2002
June 70, ?002
June 27, 2002
January 2:1, 2003
'~1ar<..h 2-1, 2003
Ap,,1 24. 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26 2003
Nmember I, 2005
,
I
X X<
'rT1un-Lj1
,i rX X X~
~ ;- I-~ ~~
. IT] 'j 1 I .
l~U_11 I ~
~.VJ.u!.,I.N.Q_LWESIJU:YillIO rj
{8;JllDING,) EAST [lEVATION IS MIRROR 11,,1AG[1
B1
-E!I
6;Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
ElectrIcal SIgns And Neon
r
~Iti
1749 E 28th St
Signal Hill. CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655.4336
fax: (562) 427.6875
W'NW signrnethods com
SC,\LE 3/32'= 1'.0"
~
~
Exhibit D
M!j~. .goo/" CJI Wall Wichl,
FRPFF PAiNTrnl(W SrHFrilllf-
ETfO PLAZA
I
~
MCLX
Leiter Ht
/"", - 1'-' : I " '
<\ I) il\lj : L" )
I'
(0, \
f~' -, '
(I I' :' i
i'\'
i i
Blj 8730W'loggiCJ' 1oH-while)
_B}J 873'2W"FrontierTon {hghtton)
A.l_i 7783M "Toa:;ted Ton" [tan)
!:l734M "Bark Mulch" kloy)
aI 87350 "WilJ Country" (raw umber)
(3 (def, 10 he \.w.~e'f",iflecl (lflcl ();:.p!()~ecl D'I
Lo~dlold8,Clty, I~u~ bn'~,r HI
SIGN PROGRAM
4'.0"
!v,ox Slocb,c1
Copy
Ht:i(lht
" 'II
i j\:1 . il '
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sunborn Road
Terneculo, CA
SIGN TYPE, "" j"'--""~~I SECONDARY TENANT WALL SIGN M:~X. 300 SQUAK,t FEET
FONT OTHERWiSe ,'\PPROvrl! [)'{ LANDLORD l\Nn CiTY
SPEC\f\(,A11()N~ \nd'ividuo\ reverse-pan cnonnellfJIlerstobriCCiIt:cJ 1-10011 063 olum,num with 090 aluminum faces Return
depth to be three (3) inche~, Exterior to be pointed using outolTlotivc 8110111el in colol note::J in schedule. Interned lIeon, , No
decoration of chonrlellettcr lace is permitted. Logos rllUV nol ex,~eed 36".-:36" rmu mil be e~c'llJded tron~ the mc;ximum sq. Ft
Calculation ond may be illuminoted with nr:ciIl or LED lighting Olhe!\.\'isc Leltel sly[c~, Colors, Gnu use of Logos ore subject to
Landlord and City apPlOvol
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
..:!f.'_:_!)..).,:.~~'l!
Aplil 25, 2002
May 13, 1002
May 22, 2002
j<Jr>c 14 2002
J<Jnc "10, 2002
J<Jne 27, 2002
jon<JCJr', 23, 2003
Malch 24, 2003
l\p,,1 14, 2003
J'JI'~ 10 200:.!
j<Jn~ 16, 2003
tk)/~,,,bt,, I, 2005
SIGN TYPE 1 w.-.. 1-.--,
~.
slpli;\ii~n(
~~ ~ ~~-f
SIC;" Tn ~---'~I :i:>::c,"'c"" ' - I ' ----------
'" "~'co,,,,"" ~ Ie I I~
j t&-tfZl I~
<!;MI"
SIGN METHODS INC.
E\..t1r"~al Sjgn5 And Neon
1749 28th St
Signal Hill CA 90755
15621 989.5755
18001 655.4336
Fox' (562) 427-6875
wv.,w slgnmethods [om
::'C',lE 1/32" 1'.0"
!IJJ1WII'\JG_LV'Lts LfJJV AT10N
(BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATIOf\IIS MIRROR IMAGE)
~
~
Exhibit E
BUILDJNG 2 \NES1 ELEVA110N MADiSON SIDE ONLY
EXIBIT EE I
!
T-
-..,-
:2'.(>"
MLI1
Lelter HI
SIGN TYPE. ...)..'1 Jo'-1l:.n.:JJ SECONDARY TENAN-r WAll SIGN - MAX. 30,0 SQUARE FEET
FONT: OTlifRWISr APPROYfIJ IW LANUl.ORD AND CITY.
SPE:CJfK::A-T.LQt:l..s.., Individual rwerse-pan channel fetters, fabricated from .063 aluminum with 090 olurninulll fo(e~ Return
depth 10 be three (3) inches. Exterior- to be pointed using automotive enomel in color noted III schedule. Internol I,eon. No
decoration of chonnelletter face is permitted. Logos. may nol e...cecd 36")(36" ond wil\ be e::.c\vded hDm lhc maximum sq, rt
Calculation and may be illuminated with neon OJ LED lighting. Otherwise Letter styles, Colors, (me! use of Logos ore subject to
Landlord ond City approval,
,:l'.n"
Mo. S'Clcker!
CDpy
Meiuht
"II'
l.
J._
SIGN fYPE
~
"-
,
,
'I.
e,UILDI\lG'2 WEST tlE\If'lTION MA\)I')OH SlOt ONL';
EXCEr:IO~I_ iH-,-~blAlW},{ 2jl(QJ~t21lQQE
U:UAL'{Jjj0_U_S."L~$....S.tQWN
BUILDING 2 WEST ELEVATION
EXIBIT EE
Max, 80% 01 Wall W,dth
I t~~EI
I ,)
I III'
"'1 i I Ii
\, '\"1 1 \
I ,I il
SIGNTYPE:~-..,
,
"
;'1: Gj, r~b ~;L:;.'~L~-!,\{
~'J~~'.C;' ."I~Jlll\-,),h,\~!\I;~"I.
""I"'~ "'"U' )
-',"""'''"'1'"
1 'c,'l <,F" ,:
\-B
X
.,._,..\.,'"
. AI.'.'. "..'....1
...~
. "
- ~
SIGNTYI'L~
\Typ" \-'k" CfT,,,,,,1 Vo"",)
FRA/FF PAltJT rnlnq, SC:HEDUlE
B1, Sl30W 'logglo" (of! whjl~J
B2: 81J2\^i "F'anher Ton iliqht tonl
_~!-. / ltl3M "Too~t()d Ton" {tan)
~_, 8734M' Bark Mulch" IcI(J~)
I!I 87350 "Wrld Counlry Iro.... umber)
13 Color5 ti:' be Mle~mlned and a~proved bi
l(l~dIQILj~,C,I.. (~ne E,h'~;1 Il)
EHO PUlA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temeculo, CA
Date:
-
April II. 2002
Revisions:
>\pril 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
Ma~ 22, 2002
June 14. 2002
JunC' 20, 2002
JUr1e 27, 2002
l<1nuCJl'y 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10,2003
JUIl~ 26, 2003
Novernber ], 2005
<!;M'-"
SIGN METHODS INC.
-ftec1~ic(f1 Signll And Neon
1749 E. 281h S1
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(5621 989.5755
(800) 655.4336
fa" (5621 427-6875
www.signmethods com
SCALf: 1/32" 1'.0"
~
~
::'IGNTYPE~
(TyIJ" r'I"<:<.;,,,c,,t "'u(ic,)
Exhibit EE
~----._. 4'-0" Apprx.
---r--
QQQOQ~m
"--" -..-.... ...~_.. .~.... '.-.
~
L
SIGN TYPE, [,!:I:J
BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS
SCALE 1/2"~ 1 '.0"
1" thick rve, pointed os noted
Numbers to be installed
flush to building fascia using YHB
tape and construction adhesive.
Two (2) sets of address numbers per
building, as indicated on elevations
!'6L~CQLOR..s.ClilllJJLL
B1: Fraiee 8730W 'loggio" (off.while]
B2 r:'Ozee 8732W 'Frontier Ton" (li9hllon]
A l! Frazee 7783M ''Toosted Tor," (loll)
Frazee 8734M 'Bwk Mulch (cloy)
m rrozee 8735U 'Wild Country" (row umberl
-SIGN TYPE, r.J:I3
,III. 'T!
1I,1X x Xr[-1X
I -~
r- U_
(It-I )(
_Fl
D
,i
/
)1\
.......jil--
i ,1
I:j ti
J1.PJ.hA.L6.QnRF\<:" PI AlFMFNI
SCALE: 1/16"'-"1'-0"
----r EQ
-1.EQ
,
~
'r-
EHO PUZll
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Rood
Terneculo, CA
Date:
April II, 2002
Revisions:
81:
April 25 2002
May '13, 2002
Moy 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
JanuOIY 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
Ap,i1 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
Novf'rT,bt;>, I, 2005
~~ '
<5Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Electrlc,"l 519n5 And Neon
1749 E. 281h 51
Signal Hill, CA 90755
15621 989.b755
18001 655-4336
Fa" 1562) 427-6875
www.signmethods.com
~
~
Exhibit F
8'.0"
w
.......- 81 ;
-'---1
,
-
1ii11\.~'Ii"'"''''
l___ Mill. 200 ~I.I. It.
lonuscoping GrICO
ClIOU'lU bme 01 ~ign
LCHlcJs((JfJing pion must
i_"l!Vlcll: i"r '1I;:or-rOUl1d
_:olor
~
82 !
m
Bll
SIGN ELEVATlUN
SIGN TYPE: tml:I
DOUBLE-fACED MONUMEI'H
5LFnFltATIQ.t15-,
MllilVlflent !!.!.9-.n., cornice Gnd baS0 to be lobncuted fl"elm olUI1'lnUIll witl\
texcote paint finish os noted in schedule,
1eW'l1 .coR'i to be routed and barked With white acrylic TCrlunl SliJll
cobinet to intemnlly illumil10te usirlg flourescent lurnp~
6.g.dL~lJJ]JergJ~ to be f1at.cul.oul olul1"'inull-', pointed cs noted df,xecJ
to bose of sign,
EHO PLAZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
--1'.8"-
6"
r
~~
I" ":\.'~.~:j.)j I~ ~
~ ,':~~~,:@!~~/~'j11: --L:- ;...
~~
~~
Madison Avenue ond
Sanborn Rood
Temeculo, CA
Date:
Aprd 11, 2002
r
:1
'?
'"
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
Moy 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20 2002
June 27, 2002
jonuury 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
Novembel 1, 2005
.
-,
Ie
SIGN PROFILE
(Srreel Side)
QiMI'
SIGN METHODS INC.
-Electrical Signs And Neon
FRA7FF PAI~,JT C'lllllR .;;n-lFnlll F
1749 E 28th St.
Signal Hil" CA 90755
[562) 989-5/55
1800) 655-4336
Fa" [5621 427.6875
www.signmethods com
B1 8730W "Loggio" (off-white)
~2 I 8732W "Frontier Tan" (light lonl
A l' 7783M Toostcd Ton" (Ian)
8/34M Burl Mulch" (cloy)
m 873SD "W,I,d Country" (rllW ulnber)
[3 ColQrs 10 be d~terlnl",ed and \lpfJ(uved b\' City
" f l"b'l r'l
SCALE'1/4" 1 ,0'
~
~
Exhibit G
~ TENANT SIGNAGE COLOR SPECIFICATIONS:
The following guidelines ole to be adhered to in selecting colors for sife and
tenant signoge:
.. Sign colors should be selected to provide sufficient contrast Og(JjllS~ building,
background colors
. Colors within each sign should be harmoniously blended
'Sign colors should be compatible with building background colors
~ Signage colors should provide variety and excitement
. Color of letter returns should contrast with face colors for
o good doyllme readability
.. Neon colors should complement related signoge elements
'" Color of trim cop r-etainers must match the color of letter returns
and logo returns
All sign colors ore subi,ect to review and approval by the Owner os part of the
tenant s'lgn submli1al
3M COLORS
I I WHITE #20
_ BLACK #012
_ BURGUNDY #49
_ RED #33
_ BLUE #67
_ INTENSE BLUE #127
_ EMERALD GREEN #126
ACCEPTABLE COLORS FOR SIGNAGE SHOwN ABOVE.
ANY ONE SIGN MAY USE A MAXIMUM OF FOUR COLORS.
OTHER COLORS MAY BE ACCEPTABLE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
THE LANDLORD ANa THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPT.
au PONT PAINT SYSTEMS FOR PAINTED SURFACES.
C SIGNAGE
COLORS
Exhibit H
ELECTRODE INSULArlr~G ~...... - ==
Boor GTG INSULATING ~'~ l
SLEEVE PRO\ IDEO MIH l U
SIGN lJ
--. :ll
Signoge Detail Specifications
LISTED SIGN SECTION NEe 600 3
CONSISTING OF INSULATING BOOTS
I!'.JSULATING SLEEVES. PLASTIC FACE,
TU3E SUPPORTS A~JD CHAN~JEl LEITER
SUITABLE FOR DAM~ 'NET OR OUTDOOR
LOCATIONS UNLESS MAAKED FOR DRY
OR iNDOOfl LOCATiONS Ot~L y
~RIMCAP
~\
\ 5
-)
,.-<'--------
lU~c SUPPORT _____
---
NEON TUBE --.........,
(SPAn~G MANJAINED
"Erl SPACING TABLE),
PLASTIC FACE -..--.--
lETTER
HEIGHT
"iARIES
/
ELECTRODE INSULATING ~
BOOT, GTO INSULATING
SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH
SIGN
/
/
/
CONDUIT LOCKN;jT ---'
[TYPICAl).
'r----- -
DRAI~J HOLES IF USED IIJ OAr/P _.1
WE~ or, Oul;)OOR LOCATIOI'JS.
.:.
...................
---.
"""""'"
/;. ~Er.\EE~ :;$UlAIW IIISH '10l,AGE WI'IOJG AND r, 'Pli,W', \VlCJG AND <i OE~D MeTAl 1'.I:,'t O""-D
',1,IM PA'lAl,EL5 THo rilCh ','QUACE WU,II,C fO~ 1.1("0' T..w. I" L,I~Ci~
, ;;E;WWil,EON1L;"11GA:;L)NoAnESrS~rFl\Ct
(' 8ErwEE~ UNIN\IJL"JEO HIGK 'iUJAC, PAHIS NiD Ii OE;Ci "lflAL,~,O 21 1~l\uLA:EJ l":CH VC'~L'.GE
OllSIJPPl\COI'lui,C:O:l,
~ ~mYEEN IJI'JiI~LJLA!ED HICHIO,fAGE P~"TS.lNG II OlhfR V!!-UiAif[, l"'GH V('l1AG: PA"T'i Ml['
<'IUIWSULAT,DSU'~iVA!\DiC'WV0l1A(;~rAAI3
l'l0',TACf
IIOSITO',CAiJ li"NCH li41NCH )!4,I,(,H I I~ IC H
1:'O'"IIOlColJl1 ":41IKI" 1M INCH I,I:~ 11'1r:1l 1-li2INC"
!11;C01K'1!,J(IO 'l>JCeI II~ 1IIClj , 1:2INCH " 1~iC'1
_/'~'-
/"
1.'<1" DJ., 2'1(2 NYLON ANC\--lORS
:OUR 14) PER LETTER MIN
-1...
JB- ~ r- O?IMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE
\IEC GUCJ-5,
.r ~_ ,~~/-
}-JJ-~'/
l r . ~ /' ENClOSURE) SUITABLE FOR DAIV',~ VIET OR OUTDOOR
'_ - GROUND WIRE LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY OR INDOOR LOCATIONS
r( -- -, GrlOUNDED ENClOSURE'\. ONLY. ACCESSIBLE, NEC 600-3, 600-5[cII1 1(2). 600-7.
'\ \ ~ ~ /... 600.8, 600-9[d), 600-21 &600.23,GROUNDEDErKLOSURE.
\ \ t---::: ~ OJ. ~ LISTED DISCOr~NEcr SWITCH IN PRIMARY TO BE WliHII',
'- '---- _( L .-:::-, r, SIGHT (MAXIMUM 50 FT.] OF SIGN, [MANY INTERPRET
'---------l r- -:\1 = TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART OF SIGN)
GROU~JDSCREW NEe 1\0-3[B), 600-6,
CO~Jr~ECI10N .\ SPACI.NG MAINTAINED PER SPACING
\ \ TABLE
\', ,.......----- '"' '
~=--[ f......_ _ ~ 1... SUITABLE FOR D'Me WET OR OUTDOOR
__ v- ~l LOC,ll.rIO~JS U~JLESS ~MRKW FOR DRY
qa. V"\~_ OR INDGOR LOCAHONS ONLY. ACCESSiBLE
FASTENERS AS REQUIRED
BY lOCAL JURISDIClION
clSH;D FLEX IMETAL SHOWN] AND LISTED GTO C/IBlr
iSECONDARY SIDE ONLY), SEE DWG C6 AND C7 FOR DETAIL
REQU'REMENTS FOR NON"METALLIC SEE DWG C6AAI'JD C?A
,~ LISTED SIGN SECTION ICONSISTS OF TRANSFORMEf1 AND
- GCiGlJI~[! SCRE\V TO BACK OF
LEDER fROI'.1 TRANSFORMER
(;,SE <JI~E TO EACH LETTER
WALL vARIES iN THICKI'-JESS -_/
AND \11ATERIAL
SEAL BUllDII'JG PENETRATlONISI TO COMPLY WITH
r..PPlICABLE 8U1LDI01G CODE REQlJIRE,'v1ENTS,
lISJ:NGMARKS
~'I LI51i~JG -MA~\(SIGN-S'ECiI6~(LABEl'SHALlBE ON EACH
,LEITER AND TRANSFO;'<MER ENCLOSURE
~I ThE rlRS1 BlANf: SPACE IDENTIFIES THE NUMBER OF
:EA.CH SIGNSEC11()fJ
~i THE SECOND BLANK SPACE It!DICATES THE TOTAL
L~UMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS
INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC AND LOCAL ELECTRICAL CODE,
CHANNEL lETTER
INSTAllATION & WIRING DETAil
UL #48-Tl D,
, ,
UNDERWRITF.f,S IABORkJORlt~
r~OT TO SCALE
I ':~N CHANNEL LETTERS I
I DATE: !DAAWlNG: C~llW16 I
11119/05 !1COOC/SlOC WIll1W/OrIJ(;f>II~Vl
I SCAlE' NOl TO SCAlE I
I COOR[)jNATOR:
JOE CAVNDS
DESIGNER:
GI
n.Ii"'~rc::l"""l4lllllO<ldoalQn
W:.lGN MtI}!OOS.,lI ill1"'lOrepro:N:a
".,"fQo'-'ln~(J(t~P'O(lu:::a,orlj
1~lhoJnIol'MI"'mclnlhaa>d\.ll~ I
l~oI3GN~"11-lOOS I
ICOi: ~1~1l"]~I~t.~1~~:[.1I~~ II Jllil
CDMMEN1S' I
I ~PERlY OWNER APPROVAL'
I;USJOMER'SS1GNAlURE:
ITh'~."l'<"oro"",""'"
,'Y""ont<rrl"rlJIbO_~"'P"(U"''''
:...-.,.,nf>Jt<<'.~
I NI.~"~].
REV,' I DATE ' OESlGNf(l'
---,-+--- ---i--
__------.L
dMi'
I SIGN METHODS INC.
I II..clrlooIS'lIn....n<lNGon
1','",Z8ir,,',
'""",,'H'!I,,-/, "oor~
llli.'.I'>IL'>.MtlrY.:,[),Cl'M
Exh i bit
Signoge Detail Specifications ~
THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. THIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF THE SIGN.
lls'm~dGrI5Er:ilt)"IIE\:61)t, '
C:)"SI~TI.~(; OF 1~ISUI/,TI~C BUCTS
"'ULAT:NG,LEEVf:i.ALIJM F<E.TU'r
~UPPOI~ I) N~U ~f;Vf:~"t PAN CHA111,h Lf: II Eo"
~,Ulli\B'_E f')P, CN.~;' '!lET OR UUTlJ(;t),
lr)CATI{jt~S UNLfS~"\."'R,W i'C'P.I-J",
OR INDOCf: LOCNliJr.',01,Lr
LETTER
HEIGHT
VARIES
AII"\I'II),~(J~ Ilffl'/fTNI,,[ -----.
'_".."".'..NI1.,'=>
W:L1P,uDI:'rl~UL.\r ,'C; ~OUIC;IU
I,SUL,;[INC:,U,EVEPPCWIClE:lW,lll
jl",,,
.CI\L,IJ!T LOeHJ'Y' 1T'r'PI-~NI
:1'''I~IHt)LEj!fll::'mll'JrlA!,;r:V-il:r~ ~\I=-=
(;~Qo.!,I)CORIOCA.iICII'I" "".P I ==
_LL
\','"LL '/.'\P.lI::, IN TI'lIcnJt'<,'\I'<ll
MA:ERIAl
SEAL BUILDING PENETRATIONS TO
COMPLY WlTH APPLICABLE BUILDING
CODE REQUIREMENTS
L
IJEPTli
VARIES
~ LISTED
LISTING MARKS:
LlSllr-JC ,\i,J,RK SIGN '.lE( TIOII L,A.elL
:'1 ,'r\LL SE Or-.. EAlJI LETTERAWJ
TkANSFORM[R ENCLOSURE THE FIRST
IlL'\I'lK SI!j\G I[)ENTIFIE~ T""iE i\JUMBE~,
OF Et\(H 5IG~~ SECTIUN. THE SEU1I\JlJ
BLt..i\JK S~ACE II-.jDICATES THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF SIGi'J SECH)NS
iOR OTHER ACCREI JiW;
TESTING LABORATORY:,
mCTRIC SIGN SECTiON
NO .\x- L',J~'J0
DrfD
Ii.." I 3' Nll0f~ ;INer'OkS, Mlr; FI),!R ("I 'f~ LETTER
1;"r_UJD[ jPAr:C~
I-
~iI!MI\~'( l:l[':,,:T~I(.,\L jOU,CE. Ml. 6G0'~
II~T[[! f,lIS(ulll.:EG ~WITi.H IN f~'MPY 70 BE WITHI~I SIGf'r riMvi
"L H, Of ,1':;11 i,IUM! flTEPPRET H,.','I,FO'iviEP, ENCLCo"IIRE TO
~ ~ :,E :':':Tf~::Si(:lr:LI:IE~::~ :(HliD6~~T:C G,~\C~~LE n(ONO~~(
,r}"tJlll(1 SE-nWGL6A In( fCRDr:TAII RE(JlJIRWEI.TS F()<
I OII"ETILI< ~EOWvC~Ar,ljl_rl,\
/ - '1'/1 rJI~I\'J1II',11 cP;,lfU~L TI\~lf
- ""' 11", I,l( ICJIIICv',~I.JI~UrIR" L,fU.~l~rl,I}
II U,i(lU:;UPE! SLJ':."BLE F":'R [)AiA': '.'IE": m OIJTOon~ LOCATI()~J~,
1,1;.::" iiARr:W rf IR UR'! :'II_A1IO~I\ ",IL'I, ';U.E',jIW' ~IEC Gr:IO
'I ";,,. 1,'11;" I}I;II.~, /JUfl.old i,(,iI,;.1 :'"u(),2:i
1,1',
<~~
\~::J~ I
'~
.~
L.--F..\STf"fRSR~Ql.':Hl!lj,
.j r .C-C \e L'~I~{J,r-Ti<j'..J
.
SPACING TABLE:
i/2"
J~TVIEEN 1I,:ulilHClICIGH V(iLT-"-GEdIUIG -"-1,1) III P~IM;'P.(VII.lI'.G Ari:J i2\ DEAD ,.,.HAl
,','llfP( (I(Al' /,-',fTA~ ~AR;'Ll,m ~,'I( IIIG; I \'OlrA:;~ WIf:II<G rO~ ,'~0R( TIIA.!, I' LE~IGTI-I
~[lwE!:r', ~I!:nl\ [U8IN(; "",Ill 'lE;,RE)T JUR~~C~
1Jf:IW'-UI'I~.lliSllL"rtD HICH-VOcIA\.il ~^PI~ ~,r<[J "I Ol/'!J :Atl,\[ ,'.NC' 121IN~L!lNtD HIGH
,,-'Ll',:J: (}~:; IPPLY r-Or'1IJlIC'<JR~
~.f.I'iI_Er, JI\I/';Slll"r~U 111(,11'010, l"i~[ p,<.pr:: ArjU II, rJTlIEP, II..J,UV,TW IiICII-VO'.T;',GE
I'"f'r' .,'rIL' ." Ilt~II~'L:r.i\rw ~I rpp,y ilJf; L']':,'VO.!:..Gt I':.n',
VOLTAGE A B C D
1",1 II) ~1I0l I'~ 1\(11 r ,lltKH ~"II~.OI i INCH
I.:c. ;(1 II'lIu(1 J.," I"C~ r ~ 11.;(,' r 11I1I'J'~I~ 1.1,2IN(H
I L'~i, I T , IC,\llIU r IN'j-i 41~>C' r 1.2Ii-1(H 21t~(H
I SIGN SECTIOI',
UL48-T1 D
'I~'.: '!, ':1,:'
~EON>I>.I.OILLUMIN'IION
SPACEDI,lil'O"""lL
rROJECr
HALO lIT LETTERS
. ~DC'\TIr:.'1 ~
i N/A
tl~;T;\9/0S !1'~~'~~:'L1T Imm
I:;':AH IlOHrJ
h:~--"-'------'--'----
! .~. . ~"/A
luE,.[,I.;Ff'
Gr
,
IThiS. '5 an originnl
I ~'npubljshed de~jgn by SIGN
METHODS. All righls 10
reprocJuL~ il i,l whole or in
porlarto prDc.iu<.:eany
likeness thereof sholl remOln
. "'1I."..".~~i..~,..1.J~,"'~
COMr',iE'm '
PROPERlY OW'JF.P. APPROVAL
CUSTOIv'IER'SSIGI..;ATURE
1No'*""'~nt.OIJ(JIolOC()l\loct
;<l\I_"ClI'<1"'r'''t>l_lnlO~''''
, _ull'''r,or\<JJh;lIlln'''"
:la'j~'(.)~1o
NUMBER.: D^TE I [IE'.IGNI'R
(1iMi'
SIGN METHODS INC,
, E'C<I,I<,,1 Sign. And Nun
i '0 ;') f. ,~", S' T"I IS62: q~~.~IOJ
I """d ~dl, c," ~i.i5S 10001 A$S.":IJI,
I ~~." '.~""'..'If."J,.""., f", 1\(,1', ,.,7 ,,87'i
Exhibit
WALL MATERIAL DETERMINED ~~
ON SITE DURING INSTALLATION ~
fiNISHED SURfACE DEPENDS _____________ ~ ~
ON STRUCTURE OF EXISTING _________ '"
BUILDING ON SITE ~
TRIM CAP ____ I~~'~'-',
~
~---
'-~ \\,
I~~C~
\ - 'IT
/ - 114'0X4 NYLON ANCHORS
WALL VARIES IN THICKNESS AND MAIERIAL ~ \'-v^- 1'1 PER LEITER '""
Signoge Detail Specifications
CL
Ell
LED
LmER
HEIGHT
VARIES
12 VOLTS DC-\~-- -
L,ED. STRIPS
CUT AS REQUIRED
\1
, [
I
,
PLASTIC FACE.
ICOLOR DETERMINED
BY COMPANY OR
ORGANiZATIONS
TRADEMARKI
L.ED. SCREWED '-~
TO CHANNEL LmER BACK
WITH #6 X 1/4' SCREWS
OR TAPED W/ VHB. CLEAR
TAPE TO BACK Of LmER
.104D X 1/2' WIDE).
~_. DRAI~~lES IF USED IN DAMP'"_7 -
WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS
i SEAL BUILOIr\G PENETRATION(SI TO COMPLY WITH
I APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS,
LISTING MAfiKS:
~~Isflr;ii}-MARK SIGN SECTT6NLAB'fL"B(O~TtACCj-CmEiT
! AND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE
_I TrlE FIRST BLANK SPACE IDENTIFIES THE r~UMBER (IF
i EACH SIGN SECIION.
_:TrlE SECOND BLtl,NK SPACE INDICATES THE !OlAl
: rjUMBEi( OF SIGN SECTIONS
04 (CONCRETE/STUCCO
WALL W/O RACEWAY)
/" -. 114' 0 X .:1" NYLON ANCHORS
14) PER lEnER IvtIN,
\
!i
ii'
I, ..I'
'I ==E::
/ .'
. "
/ .
.- PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE
NEe 600-5.
/
/"
(~
.-. 12 VOLTS DC FOR L ED. UNITS, QTY AS REQUIRED
/ SECONDARY WiRE #18 AWGCABLE
~ ;- USTED SIGN SECTION (CONSISTS Of TRANSfORMER AND
/ ENClOSURE).. SUITABLE fOR DAMP, WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS
/ UNLESS MARKED fOR DRY OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY.
/ ACCESSIBLE
/ NEC 600.3, 600.5IcIlI1121, 600.7. 60D.B, 60D.9Id).
/ CLASS' TRANSfORMER 600.21 & 600.23 GROUNDED ENCLOSURE
/'
l!J
It'
~. LISTED DISCONNECT SWITCH IN PRIMARY TO BE WITHIN
SIGHT IMAX 50 FTI Of SIGN. (NOTE MANY INTERPRET
TRA~ISfORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART Of SIGN.)
NEe II 0.3IBI. 600.6.
rfASTENERS AS REQUIRED
BY LOCAL JUSRISDICTION.
1-
12 VOlTS DC fOR l.ED. UNITS
[QUATlIY AS REQUIRED( SECONDARY
WIRE # 18 AWG CABLE
lED, & CHANNEL lETTER
INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAil
L Ul #48
UNDERWRITERS lABORATORIES
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE. 12 VOLTS SYSTEM DOES
NOT CARRY (REQUIRE)
A GREEN GROUND WIRE.
I DETAIL: LE.D.SYSTEM
WIO RAC'eNAY & 3 PLY WALL
AND INSTAlLATION DETAIL
I DATE: IDRAWiNG: Cl.LED-04 I
11/20105 !LE,O,WoRACEl3PLYWALl
i SCALE: NOT 10 SCALE I
, I
I SAlES:
,
I
I DESIGNER'
~A
GI
'lhiI~anOf\llrd~ned<:lasiQn
bVSlGNMEIHOD,A1r'QhlslOlIIprod\.k;G
~ In wl'<llil Of 111 pal 0110 prowt:e,OO;
bnell1haraofih::llrem<llnlhae.lcluliYII
r1ghtofSlGNMCTHODS. ,
--=-
~
I ~ROPERlY Q'M'JER APPROVAl
I ;l1S1OMER'S SGNAnJRE'
Irlb... ~.__ . i;~o!\Iconrocr
rq~M;I..t""'I:I&'_I'l1o~lI;m
1IoIIt'OO"""",'OIJb:lrta!l.<\
iiiiii;j;,j'~[.I-~
IIIEY. #1 DATE'
DESIGNER
-_"____1___-
dMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
EleclIIcol $1;~.A,n<l Neon
11~'i < I~II' or Ie' 'S62) ,~~.$15"
5.;J,,~'HIl' ('''.90"(;0 !''GO',6504,\.)'.
WV/W~;GN-',1ETH~~'" !\.o~i ~1;-6;7[
Ex hi bit
Signage Delail Specifications
..
THIS SIG:'J 13 I~:TENDED T'O BE i~JS1,t..LLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 6UO OF THE NATlmJA.L ElECTRIC;..L CODE
NIOlOR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. Tf-JI$It'JCLIJD[S PI(op~r~ GROI):'JDING AND BOI',DING OF rHE SIG~~
J+
L1mDSIGNI(ON~I\l\OfPOWERSUfPlY'(HANNEllmfRS'PlASTI(\
IAU,WBI5UPPORTS,{QNDUIT,AHDQLASS(UPORINSUlATlHGBOOTIF
PROVIDED,AND DISCONNmSWITCH If PROVlDfO,AHD INSULATING SLEEVE IF 2"
PROVlOWi,SUllABlffOROllToOORlOmIONUNlEISMARKfOFORI,DOOROIIll '\ ,I- ~ ...-----~ ~-
,'- ._,-'"'~"~ - '" - ~t
TU",5UPPORTPERN[(600'33lbl~~___:~ ~~ C!J _-- ~
NEONTUBf(SPA(INGMAINTAINED-~........ """""::.> -----___
PERSPACINGTABLEj ....................-........ 1- ------- FIElD WIRING {QMPARTMfNT
~
--
Hi '",': ' ,'." '~,. ".~ "'" .:,( '" "~ flo I, ~.','.I'< I,' ".',,~. ';1'':' M,: oJ. 'Ii"~':~ ~I'i,,'
'"' ,,'., A ".~, , ., '" ".,,', '" ",' ., ~'r"
DISCDNNECT5WiTCHMAyeE
REMDH(WtATH!RPRDC!
IfOUTDODRS)NECWO.1
I,',""':
""t'I,':,lf'D~:.. ',I'("".,r;,~~', :,' ,I"\"r.",)<':~':t\,",,
,,' h.('_<l...'.II'-'"", 1!,:r'.,.,.".'J'" 'M;,_;;
..'.f':~-.' .,'
I
I
1,:"'",.1;',
1',.<>.'
../'
-.....( ...
-- PW,IARYELHTRICAlIOUP.(f
(/,IN MIN (DNDUIIMETAl
IHOWNlNE(6DO.6&60D-21
, , ',~"
; , , ~H
".',
1",(."
"101'_
"..,'
"<':d
,.~-
-- ----- ElWRONICPDW[RSUPPLY
CLEAR lEXAtI BACK --___
lETTER
HEIGHT
VARIES
---- --- - SPACINGS MAINTAINfD PER SPACING TABLE
-"'~
J
')---114" HKSCRfWS IfllDI WITH SPACERS
/
/
ME(HANICAlCONNWIOt~lrwISTEOOKI-----___________
1.11Z"INMIN Cl!ARANCETHROUGH
AIR OR ACROSS SURFACf TO WBE
CONNECTION, NECbOO.J4Ih)
DO
GLASS CUP OR INSULATING BOOT -,-__
(NO REOUIRtD SPAClNGI --
-'-
/
j~ ~-//
~~f
.~ -!<
.. fX4'Xl/4"sQUARETUBEFOR
~ERfI(Al WINDOW FRAME
DRAIN HOLES If USEO IN DAMp,-.............
wHOR OUTOOOR LOcATIONS
j"Xl'(UPRIVETEDTOLtXANBACKAHDATTACHEOlO-
SIDEWITH#8XWPHlllIPSSCREws
SEAL BUILDING PENETRATloNISl TO COMPLY WITH
APPUCABlEBUILDINGCOOEREDUIRHHNT5
lISTltlGMARKS,
~TlThNGMARKSIGNSmIONlABElSHAllBEONEA(H
LETTER AND TRANSFORMER ENCLQSURf
~ 1HE fiRST BLANK SPACE IDENTIFIES THE NUMB(ROF
[ACHSIGNSECTloN.
~THESE(QNDBLANKSPACEINDICATESTHETOlAl
: NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS
t-Y'-
OVERHEAD VIEW
NOfTOS(Alf
UL #48-E4A
FRONT AND BACK LIT
SELF-CONTAINED CHANNEL LETTER
WITH ENCLOSURE SIGN FACE DETAIL (NEON)
rWT 10 SCALE
UNDERWRITms lA.BOIl;..rORIES
'I~Und8I';/riler51
.l ~~b,~r3!ories ln~,
I " HE,'",__~r.;N "
,;"""fti--:-,,ivo....o;..,-_
""""""-...."""...-
""""".."",_..",,~.
IROJECT fID~'lNGI.lL\t1T
mf.(DN1AI~ED(I\lHH[ltm[R
WllHE~QO\Uit\IGNFA(,(NEOHI
DArt [!JKAWlr'IG
11,19/05 i DETAil
,(~LE
NOTED
'ALE-.
l'liA
1.l1:,IUI'.'f'
GI
This is an origmal
unpublished design by
SIGN METHODS. All
rig hIs to reproduce it in
whole or III port or to
produce ony likeness
thereof shall remain the
exclusive right of SIGN
. ",It... ~;. . ..:'..11; ~
CO),\,\~ENTJ
PROPERW')WI,;ER"PPPOV.l.l
CL5TOlvlER:S JIGNAll.'RE
'l;: 2005 Sign Melhod~, In'
I,~,,~"","., ""'''''''''''"'''0;'"'' "'''J
M.I'od..'",..""!M.D.,"d,h,,''''.'..,,,1
."",I',"~.",,,lo, "", '"''0'''''''>'''''''
'."'~""'"''''''''O"O"."""",,,,,,,,,ol
5,OM",,,,,I,,,<"",,,,,0I.1""II'"''''''
NUMBER i DATE DESIGf:J(R
I 1]2-'24/05 ,'iB
1
,
~MI'"
~IGN METHODS INC.
~I~"'I,,,I Sign. And Nc<>n
II!l.<JF 2EloSI T.! 'IS<J,]/:,
)"'''01 H'.II Ce, 'IO/S'; I,~~ ",)6
"H"W"",,'i;ad, 'v:""" ,12/-,',H'o
Ex h i bit
EHO PUZJ\
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
ROUGH NOTES COMPilED BY JAMIE & GREG ISlAS fOR MERNAl USl
(FROM TEMECULA SIGr'1 OROII'JANCE)
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Rood
Temeculo, CA
fREESTAJ.:J.WU..G.....5.JDNS ~OTES:
5' SETBACK OR 17' FROM FACE OF CURB IWHICHEVER IS LESS1
OUTSIDE SITE VI$ITllITy ,I\RF,\ '
PER? TO STREET. EXCEPT AT END Of CUL.DE.SAC
150 FT BETWEEr~ SIGNS
MI::A~UI(E HT FROM I-JEAREST J-IAROSCME BEI~MNC UP TO 2 FT IN ADON Tn MAX HT ALLOWED
FLOOD lIGHTIt..JG ENCOURAGED
SAME BACKGROUND CULOR ALL TEI'JMH5
CENTER 10 SIGNS SHALL BE ONE SIDED, UTHERS TWO-SIDED
LANDSC.~PING = 300 $.f AROUND BASE (IF FWY-ORIENTED), If NOT, lon IF CENTER 10, 200 If MULTI-TENANT
Date:
Aprd II, 2002
INCLUDE FLOWERING PERENNIALS, AWJUALS, OR OTHER COLOR PLANTS YR-RQUND COLOR REQ. D.
ADDRESS REQUIRED. NOT COUNTED IN AREA
ILlUMINATIOr--J ONLY COPY TO IlLUMll'lATE - NO OVERALL F'\CE ILLL)M
Revisions:
NO EXTERNAllLlUM FOR MULTI.TENANT SIGNS
NOTE SIGI'~ \I\,IIDTH (DEPTH2) TABLE
WA.~' SJG~~UQIIS;
April 25. 2002
May 13, 2002
Moy 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
JOnUOf'/ 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
JUlle 10, 2003
J\J!'te 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
April 17 '1n'"
C5MI"J
MAX OF <.\ PER BUSINESS PER SIDE
DESCENDING AREAS PER SIGN=SEE 17,20.15
Mlr--l. 8 LETTER HEIGHT, 6" FOR STACKED COPY
INIILLUM, CHANNEL LETTERS, HALO,
NO EXTERNAlILLUM, IS PERMITTED.
SIGN METHODS INC.
Electrical Signs And Neon
1-888- TEMECULA
1749 E. 28th St
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655-4336
Fa" (562) 427-6875
www signmethods.com
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION 06-_
G;\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\MEMO to PC.doc
4
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0390 TO MODIFY AN APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM
FOR ETCO PLAZA GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON AVENUE
Section 1. Greg Islas with Sign Methods Inc, filed Planning Application No. PA05-
0390. a Sign Program Modification application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula
General Plan and Development Code.
Section 2. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application on April 19, 2006 and May 17, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed
by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter.
Section 4. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of the Application subject to and based
upon the findings set forth hereunder.
Section 5. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.28.080.B of the Temecula Municipal
Code.
A. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and
visually related to:
1. All of the signs included in the sign program. This shall be accomplished by
incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style,
colors, illumination sign type, or sign shape.
2. The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors,
or design motifs included in the building being identified.
3. Surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or
obscuring adjacent approved sign.
The proposed sign program modifications will enhance the development, is in harmony
with and visually relates to all the signs included in the sign program by incorporating
common design elements such as materials and illumination into the program. The
proposed sign program modifications will not adversely affect the surrounding
development and land uses or obscure adjacent approved signs.
B. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to
changes in building tenants.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc
I
C. The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of this Chapter, in that the sign
program complies with all the regulations of this Chapter, except that flexibility is allowed with
regard to sign area, number, location, and height. Further, to the extent the sign program does
not comply with the requirements of this Chapter as to sign area, number, location, and height,
the proposed sign program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the
objectives of this Chapter;
The proposed sign program modifications accommodates future revisions which may be
required due to changes in building tenants by specifying that tenants vacating premises
shall be responsible for the removal of their sign within 30 days of vacating the premises.
This includes the removal of the signs, capping electrical wiring, filling all holes and
painting wall surface. No new tenant signage will be approved until the prior signage
has been removed and the area restored.
Section 6. Environmental Comoliance. This project is exempt from review under
CEQA, pursuant to Section 15311 (Class 11 Categorical Exemption - Accessory Structures) of
the CEQA Guidelines.
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 17th day of May 2006.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
G:\Planning\2005\PA05 0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2005\PA05 0390 Etco Plaza Sign Revision\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc
3
ATTACHMENT 3
APRIL 19, 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0390 Elco Plaza - Sign RevisionlPlanninglMEMO to PC.doc
5
DATE OF MEETING:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
CEQA:
ORIGINAL
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 19, 2006
Christine Damko
TITLE:
Associate Planner
Planning Application No. PA05-0390 a proposal to modify an
existing Comprehensive Sign Program for the Etco Plaza Buildings
located at the terminus of Sanborn Drive at Madison Avenue also
known as Assessors Parcel Numbers 910-272-005 and 006 (PA05-
0390)
o Approve with Conditions
[8] Deny
o Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
l8J Categorically
Exempt
(Section) If Denied: Section 15270,
(Projects which are Disapproved)
If Approved: Section 15311,
(Accessory Structures) -
o Notice of Determination
(Section)
o Negative Declaration
o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Eteo Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-1 9-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
1
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: GreQ Iscas. Sian Methods Inc.
Date of Completion: December 19, 2005
Mandatory Action Deadline Date: April 19, 2006
General Plan Designation: Service Commercial (SC)
Zoning Designation: Service Commercial (SC)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Existina buildinq (Etco Plaza)
North:
South:
East:
West:
Existina Service Commercial Buildinqs
Existinq Service Commercial Buildinas
1-15 Freeway
VacanVFuture Service Commercial Buildinas
Lot Area:
N/A
Total Floor Area/Ratio: N/A
Landscape Area/Coverage: N/A
Parking Required/Provided: N/A
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
On September 1, 2001, the Planning Commission approved PAOO-0448, a 70,800 square foot
officelretail project (Etco Plaza). The project consists of two, three-story buildings having
frontage along the 1-15 freeway and Madison Avenue.
On April 3, 2003, the Planning Commission approved PA02-0426, a comprehensive Sign
Program for the project. The Planning Commission adopted a fairly restrictive program relative
to upper floor signage, because the project design and its freeway visibility warranted a more
professional office appearance. The key provisions of the program are listed below:
. Building One - One sign on the North Elevation (north end) of building. Permitted
signage listed above is only allowed for a single second-story tenant that occupies at
least 50 percent of the second floor of each building. No other second-story or third-
story signage is permitted under this approval.
. Building Two - One sign on the South Elevation (south end) of building. Permitted
signage listed above is only allowed for a single second-story tenant that occupies at
least 50 percent of the second floor of each building. No other second-story or third-
story signage is permitted under this approval.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
2
On April 29, 2003, the applicant file an appeal of Planning Commission's April 3'd approval, but
the appeal was deemed invalid because the 15-day appeal period had lapsed.
On August 6, 2003, the Planning Commission approved PA3-0323, a modification to the
previously approved sign program. The applicant had proposed the same second-story
designs in association with the original Sign Program submittal. At that time, staff believed that
allowing the additional signage would be detrimental to the aesthetics of the building. The
Commission concurred with staff on the north and south ends but approved two signs on the
second floor on the east (facing 1-15 freeway) and west sides (facing Madison Avenue) of both
buildings. The signs would be located below the secondary arched roof elements on both the
east and west elevations but the signs would still only be allowed for a single second-story
tenant if that tenant occupies at least 50 percent of the second floor.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Eteo Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
3
ANALYSIS
The applicant has modified the Sign Program to include the following changes:
Existing Program
I Prohibits logos
Color palette consists of off-whites, tan,
umber, and bronze colors
Required font type: Futura Heavy BT
Proposed Changes to Program
Allow logos to be added within the sign fascias
Increase approved color palette significantly
Allows the type of font to be determined by the
Landlord and the City
Increase maximum stacked copy height to five
feet for primary tenant signs
Maximum copy size is four feet for
primary tenant signs
Maximum copy size is four feet for Increase maximum stacked copy height for
secondary tenant signs secondary tenant signs to six feet
Maximum square footage is 30 feet
Second Floor Tenant Sign: These signs
are to identify a single second-story
tenant that occupies at least 50 percent
of second floor
WS-2a (Second Floor Tenant Sign): One
sign located on the second story under
the arch of the east and west side of the
buildings to identify a single second-story
tenant that occupies at least 50 percent
of the second floor
WS-2b (Ground Floor Tenant Sign): One
secondary sign for the east and west
elevation (one each) is allowed for each
tenant occupying two or more ground
floor tenant spaces
I No freeway signage proposed
The quantity of wall signs shali not
exceed eleven for each building
No neon and L.E.D. permitted
I Signage must be located within the
architectural banding
Increase secondary tenant signage maximum
square feet to 50 feet
Second Floor Tenant Sign: These signs are to
identify a single second-story tenant that
occupies at least 50 percent of second floor, or
otherwise approved by Landlord and City
Tenant Signs (Refer to Exhibit A- WS-2 (a,b)
Maximum of two WS-1 sign per building
Maximum of one WS-1 sign per elevation
Maximum of ten WS-2 signs per building
Maximum of five WS-2 signs per elevation
I Proposed freeway signage on exhibit A
additional information provided)
I The quantity of wall signs shall not exceed
twelve for each buildina
Allow neon and L.ED. and channel lettering
Eliminates language on how signage must
located within the architectural bandinq
(no I
I
I
be I
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4*19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
4
The applicant has applied for a modification to the approved Sign Program because Etco Plaza
has a high vacancy rate. According to the applicant, prospective tenants are not able to have
adequate signage for their business/office in these buildings. Staff does not support the
proposed sign program modifications because the architectural elements and colors of the
buildings are elaborate and increasing the color selections, size, and amount of signage will
create an overly busy fayade. This is a major concern for staff because of the high visibility of
the buildings to the 1-15 Freeway.
Despite the applicant's concern of the high vacancy rates, staff believes that the existing sign
program is adequate for future tenants. The buildings have been designed to reflect more of a
professional office fayade rather than a typical retail shopping center. Therefore, in accordance
with the intent of the City's Sign Ordinance, the signage should complement the look and style
of the building, such as the existing Sign Program has done. The proposed changes do not
take into consideration the detailed building fayade. Alternative methods of advertising this
location should be used for this site rather than relying on increased signage.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
If Denied:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been
deemed to be statutorily exempt from further environmental review (Section 15270, Projects
which are Disapproved).
If Approved:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been
deemed to be categorically exempt form further environmental review (Section 15311,
Accessory Structures).
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed Sign Program revisions for the Etco Plaza buildings do
not comply with the purpose and intent of the sign standards of the Development Code.
According to Section 17.28.010 of the Development Code, it is the goal of the City that the
design of the community is the highest quality and the quality of signage plays a very distinctive
role in achieving this role. Sign programs should preserve and improve the appearance of the
City as a place to live, work, trade, do business and visit. They should also protect the City
from the blighting influence if excessive signage so as preserve and enhance the economic
base of the City and safeguard property values within the City. In addition, the proposed
revisions will increase the size, color variation, font type, and overall look of the signage which
will negatively impact the aesthetics of the building. This is a concern for staff because of the
high profile location adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway. It is the recommendation of staff that the
proposed Sign Program Modifications be denied.
In case the Planning Commission supports the application, a Resolution of Approval is also
attached to this report.
G:\Planning\200S\PAOS-0390 Etco Plaza. Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
5
FINDINGS
Sign Program (Section 17.28.080.B)
1. The proposed sign program revIsions do not satisfy the intent or objectives of the
Development Code nor enhance the development. According to Section 17.28.010 of
the Development Code, when the quality and amount of signage detracts from the
aesthetics of the buildings, the signage can create a visual blight which detracts from
the quality of the environment and an individual's perception of the City. The proposed
revisions result in excessive signage thereby detracting from the building architecture
and aesthetics.
2. The proposed sign program will not preserve and improve the appearance of the City as
viewed from the Interstate 15 freeway, and the allowable signage exceeds that which is
considered necessary for effective business signage. According to Section 17.28.010 of
the Development Code, the City must assure that the signs are appropriate to the type
of activity and location to which they pertain.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Proposed Sign Program - Blue Page 7
2. Approved Sign Program - Blue Page 8
3. Planning Commission Minutes from April 9, 2003 - Blue Page 9
4. Planning Commission Minutes from August 6, 2003 - Blue Page 10
5. PC Resolution 06-~ (Denial) - Blue Page 11
6. PC Resolution 06- ~ (Approval) - Blue Page 12
G:IPlanning\2005IPAOS-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign RevisionlPlannlnglPlanning Commission 4-19-06IPC STAFF REPORT.doc
6
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza. Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-1g.06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
7
Sign
Program
ET[O
Plaza
MADISON AVENUE AND SANBORN ROAD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
Prepared For:
ETCO Investments, LLC
9952 SOUTH SANTA MONICA BLVD. SUITE 200
BEVERLY HILLS CA. 90212
Prepared By:
~Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Eledric_1I 5lgn," And Neon
1749 28th Street
Signal Hill CA 90755
June 26, 2003
Revision November 20, 2005
EHO PlIlZJl
SIGN PROGRAM
Sign Criteria
Subiect
Page
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
Guidelines, Directory, and Vendors
Purpose and Intent 2
General landlord / Tenant Requirements 2
General Specifications
2
3
3
Dale:
Prohibited Signs
Sign Types
April 11, 2002
Graphic Exhibits
Site Plan A
Building 1 All Elevations B
Building 2 All Elevations C
Wall Signs (Primary Tenants) &:i:.liaI D
Wall Signs (Secondary Tenants) ..;..."Uo'.4 E
Building Address Numbers .".J~'. F
Multi-Tenant Monument ..'j\.J~' . G
Signage Color Specifications .. H
Signage Detail Specifications .:II I
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
<:!Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Electrical Signs Anti Neon
1749 E 28th St
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655-4336
Fa" (562) 427-6875
www.signmethods.com
N D E X
SIGN GUIDELINES, DIRECTORY AND VENDORS
A. SIGN GUIDELINES
MANUFACTURE: All signs must be U.L. Approved and
conform to the Electrical code and any municipal building
codes.
COLORS & FINISHES: Colors and finishes must be of h'ghest
quality over properly primed surfaces and are subject to
owner approval.
INTERIOR SIGNS: Interior signs may not be visible from 0
public street and ore not regulated by this program unless
they are pertinent to or attached to a window.
REQUIRED SIGNS: Tenant is required to provide and
maintain in good condition at least one wall s\gn and suite
identification sign in conformance with this program during
the term of tenant's lease,
B. DIRECTORY
PROJECT:
ETCO Ploze
Madison Avenue & Sanborn Road
Temecula CA
OWNER/DEVELOPER.
ETCO Investments, LLC
9952 SOUTH SANTA MONICA BLVD. SUiTE 200
BEVERLY HILLS CA. 90212
(310)691.5500 Phone (3101282-8193 Fo,
ARCHITECT.
Konrad Rieger and Associates
40440 Carmelite Circle
lemeculo CA 92591
(909) 676-3759 Phone/Fa,
SIGN DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR:
Sign Methods, Inc.
1749 28th Street
Signal Hill, CA 90806
(562) 989-5755 Phone (714) 427.6875 Fo,
Contact: Jim Bras, Greg Islas
714-925-7205 phone, fo, 714-546.8647
C. APPROVED VENDORS
EICO PUlA
SIGN PROGRAM
aMi'
Sign Methods, Inc.
I 749 28th Street
Signol Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755 Phone
(714) 427.6875 Fa>
Contact: Jim Bros, Greg Islos
714.925.7205
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Rood
lemecula, CA
Date:
April II, 2002
Revls~ons:
April 25, 2002
Moy 13, 2002
May 2'2, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
Morch 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June la, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
diME
SIGN METHODS INC.
Electtlecll SlllIn' And Nllton
1749 E 28th St.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655.4336
Fa>: (562) 427-6875
www.signmethods com
and Vendors
Page
A. PURPOSE AND INTENT
The purpose of this sign program is to ensure that the
signage in ETCO Plaza reflects the integrity and overall
aesthetic values of the Landlord and the City of Temecula.
Conformity with this program will be strictly enforced, and
any non-conforming signs will be removed by the Landlord at
the expense of the tenant.
B. GENERAL LANDLORD I TENANT REQUIREMENTS
1.
Prior to manufacture of any sign in the Plazd, the Tenant shall
submit to Landlord for written approval, tv,ro copies detailed
drawings. These drawings shall include the building elevation
to which the signs are to be attached, sign dimensions,
graphics, location, colors, and method of attachment. This
approval must be obtained prior to submittal to tne City of
Temeculo.
^
<
All signs shall be reviewed for conformance with this criteria
and overall design quality. Approval or disapproval of sign
submittals based on aesthetics of design sho\\ remo1l"'1 the sole
right of the landlord.
3.
Prior to the install and manufacture of any sign, the Tenant
shall obtain 0 sign permit from the City of Temeculo.
4
The tenant shall pay for all signs, related materials, and
installation fees (including final inspection costs).
5.
Tenant fascia sIgns will comply to all requirements of this plan
Logos and colors to be approved by landlord, and City of
Temecula.
6.
It is the responsibility of the tenant's sign company to verify 011
conduit and transformer locations and service access prior to
fabrication.
7.
In the event a tenant vacates his premise, it is his
responsibility to patch all holes and paint surface(s) to match
existing color of fascia. In addition, the tenant shall provide
o blank panel for any freestanding sign he occupies.
8.
Landlord reserves the right to periodically hire on independent
electrical engineer, at Tenant's sole expense, to inspect the
installation of all Tenant's signs. Tenants will be required to
have any discrepancies and/or code violations corrected at
Tenant's expense. Any code violations, requests for sign
removals, or discrepancies not corrected within fifteen (15)
days of notice, may be corrected by the Landlord at Tenant's
expense.
9. All tenant signs shaH be installed after city permits are
secured.
10 Cooperotive tenant advertising, signing or seasonal event
signing will require 0 spedaly event sign permit from the
City of Temeculo.
C. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
Sign sizes shall be limited to maximum widths shown on
tenant's elevation, and also shall not exceed the general
sizes outlined".
2. Signs shall be fabricated per the specifications shown.
3. All signs and their installation sholl comply with all local
building and electrical codes.
4. All electrical signs will be fabricated by a U.L. approved
sign company, according to U,l. specifications.
5. Sign company to be fully licensed with the city and state
and shall have full workman's compensation and general
liability insurance.
6. All penetrations of exterior fascia are to be sealed airtight
(calor and finish to be oppra,ed by landlord ond City).
7. All conduits, transformers, iunction boxes and openings in
building sunoc.es sholl be c.onc.ealed. Exposed hardware
shall be finished in a manner consistent with quality
fabrication practices. no exposed raceways will be
allowed.
8. Signs shall be placed in locations as shown on elevations
with landlord approval.
9 All signs shall have its sign permit number, name of
fabricator, date of installation and voltage in a visible
location.
10. .Any tenant sign left thirty (30) days after vacating premises
shall become the property of the landlord unless previous
arrangements have been agreed upon by landlord and
tenant
EHO PUZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Ternecula, CA
Dale:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
<:'jM'-'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Electrical Signs And Nean
1749 E. 28th St
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989.5755
(800) 655 4336
Fox: (562) 427-6875
www.signmethods com
Sign Criteria
Sections A, B, & C
Page 2
D. PROHIBITED SIGNS
Si.....n<; ("()n"tihJtinn n Trnffir Hnmt:Q
No person shall install or maintain, or cause to be
Installed or maintained, any sign which simulates or
imitates In size, color, lettering or design any traffic
sign or signal, or which makes use of the words
"STOP", "LOOK", "DANGER" or any other words,
phrases, symbols or characters in such 0 manner os to
interfere with, mislead, or confuse traffic.
2
Sinn_" in Proximity tn LJtilitv Lin@.$
Signs which have less horizontal or vertical clearance
from authorized communication or energized electrical
power lines than are prescribed by the laws of the
State of California are prohibited.
3
Painted lettp.rs will not hp. oermitted.
4
C:nhinptjflourFl.<:<:p.nt illllminntp.r1 "ions will ni"'lt hp.:
allowed. -
5
Metal facE:!d cahinet sinn.c: (exceot as Dart of a lonol
Q!e orohihitp.o
6
Fxternallv illuminatp.d __ian_,; ore nmhihitp:rL
7
Thp.rp: shall bp. no ronftaa sians.
8
ThprPc ;;hn\l hfl nn tln<;hinn mcwlnn ()f oudihlp. "inn.;;
9
Sian.c: must be architedlJrnllv comnatihle with the entire
center and receive approval at landlord and city
zoning, planning and building departments.
10
tJo sian shall nroiect above the QDoroved sinn
envelo[)F'!
11
Vphirle Sinns.
Signs on or affixed to trucks, automobiles, trailers, or
other vehicles which advertise, jdentity, or provide
direction to a use or activity not related to its lawful
activity ore prohibited.
12
I ioht BIJlh Strin(1$
External displays, other than temporary decorahve
holiday lighting which consists of unshielded light bulbs
are prohibited. An exception hereto may be granted
by the landlord when the display is an integra! part of
the design character at the activity to which it relates.
13 Rillhr'lmd Sinn" nrp nnt oermittp.d.
14 Thp use of a OE:!rmanent solE:! sian is nmhibitp.d
The temporary use of these signs is limited to a thirty (30) day period
and is restricted to signs (affixed to the interior ot windows) which do
not occupy more than twenty (20) percent of their respective window
area. Each business is permitted a total of not more than ninety (90)
days' of temporary signs per calendar year.
E. SIGN TYPES
1. WALL SIGN~
SIGN TYPE WS-l (Primary Tenant Slgn\
Sign area not to exceed 87.5 square feet. Sign fabrication, design,
and placement is outlined in Exhib'lt '0'. .ouanfltv And location:
Maximum of one sign located on the East elevation and one on the
West elevation. Single-line or stacked copy is permitted If tenant
displays two signs, second sign must be identical to tirst.
SIGN TYPE WS-2(a.b\ (Secondary Slan\.
Each secondary sign is not to exceed 50.0 square feet in area. Sign
fabrication, design, and placement is outlined in Exhibit 'E'
Quantitv And Location.
. Sign Type WS-2a (Second Floor Tenant Sign) One secondary
sign located on the second story under the arch of the East and West
elevations of Building 1 and Building 2. These signs are to identify a
single second-story tenant that occupies at least 50% of second tlcor,
or otherwise approved by Landlord, and City.
. Sign Type WS-2b (Ground Floor Tenant Sign) One secondory
tenant sign on the ground floor of the East elevation and one
secondary tenant sign on the ground floor of the West elevation is
allowed for each tenant. See elevations tor acceptable locations for
this type of sign.
2 .GROUND SIGNS
SIGN TYPE MON (MULTI_TENANT MONUMENT SIGNI.
Two (2) monument Signs, os shown in Exhibit 'G', to be located os
shown on the Site Plan.
EHO PLAU
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
.
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
<1;Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Electrical Sign" And Neon
1749 E 28th St.
Signal H;[I, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655-4336
Fa" (562) 427.6875
www.signmethods com
Sign Criteria
Sections D & E
Page 3
\ N T E R S TAT E 1 5
",
"
'I
!
I
1 'u
' I
, ,
'--'
----------:
u
~ .. - 1;
~ BUILDING 1 ' BUILDING 2 F--~
';~' '~. 'rtl~ r I!!I- i~
~~;~~~~~'Crhr@'t':u~: SJ s I
IWS-2al (low) ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ WS.2b (low) (high)
I (hIgh) (low) (high) ( ow) IWS.2bl (low)
'. n ~ n n (low) n nLOCATION OPTION~
' I I ~ LOCATION OPTIONS J \
C:L - "I 0 ~~4> I D________~~____ . ~ - - ~ ~
o
i ~:.
: ~~
! ; ~
"
.JI
-------,
I
'-.....'
-
MADISON
/
A, V E N U
IWS_ll ~ Po."ble WS.l {P"",O"r Tenonl Woll ~i9n\ locotion
1Wl-1ro)l1a Pn."bleW~.2ISe"ond",yT..nonjW"IISi9nlle<::"I,,,n
Mo,imu", 0(...." 12) INS. I ';9~' pe,building
Ma"",omoloneIIJW$.1 "9nperel&yot1on
Ma,,"'omollenIIO)W$.2.ign.p.rboilding
Mo.;",um oflj'e 151 WS.2 >lgm per elevation
IADNI", "'.dd,e<s NombefS
I PYl I ~ F'e,wQl f,lon
IMONI3 '....onu"'''nl
P~OJKT
SITEPlArI ,.~
SCALE 1""'40' \....
NORTH
ET(O PUlA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sonborn Road
Temecula, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisi on5:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
<5Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Electrical Signa And Neon
1749 E. 28th SI.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989.5755
(800) 655-4336
Fa" (5621 427.6875
www signmethods com
SITE PLAN
Exhibit A
--.....
ALT.
jWS.2al
IWS-2al
ALT.
IWS.2al
BUILDING 1 - EAST ELEvATION (1.15)
WALL SIGN SCHEDULE,
ALl
IWS.2al
The quantity of wall signs (aU types listed below)
sholl not exceed eleven (12) for each bvilding.
ALl
IWS.2al
I WS.2a I
~S.:!J
I W5..1 ~ Primary Tenant Sign
OneWS-l.ignlocaledon!heEe,televohon
and oM on rne W.st .levOlian
..."... ~
IWS-2a~ Second Floor Tenant Sign
01'0 secondary.ign located On th..,econd .toCy
under the orch of th.. Eo.tond We>! "1,,vOlion,
01Ilu,ld,ng1ondBuilding2,H'.'."Sn"""lo
identily0 ',ngl.'.cond.,lo<ylenonlthol
occupiuotleo.ISO%ol..condfloor. ".
otherwl..opprovedbylandlordondCity
~
Ground Floor Te"c,"1 Sign
I
One.econdotytenont'ign On th" 9,ound floor cf
th. Eosl.l..vohonond on....condoryt..ntmt,ign
on th.. gfound f100. ofth.. We.t.l.vol,on i. "11,,wee!
fOf.odt.nont
BUILDING 1 . WEST ELEVATION (!\MDISON AVENUE)
~
.......
~
~----..
_ __0
..----
,
nil
SOUTHEASTElfl,'
11.5vl[W)
BUILDING 1 - SOUlt-: ELEVATION (I NT. COURTY~RD)
BUILDING 1 - NORTH ELEVATION (LOADING AREA)
EHO pun
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sonborn Rood
Temeculo, CA
Dale:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
Apnl 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
~Mi'
~IGN METHODS INC.
EI.d.-icel Signs And Neon
1749
Signal
(562 )
SCALE: 1/32"=1'.0"
BUILDING 1
All Elevations
Exhibit B
ALl
IWS-2a I
ALT.
[Ya-2!!...I
T
~
IWS-2al
.----
BUILDING 2 - EAST ELEVATION (1-15)
WALL SIGN SCHEDULE,
~S.:!1
ALl
~-l!!J
The qvantity of .....011 signs (all types listed below)
shell not &i(ceed eleven (12) for each building.
ALl
i.'1U l!!J
IWS..2a I
I WS-l I P.rlmary TenDnt Sign
,-~
OnoWS.' sign Iccct"doh1h. Ee".leve!'Ch
cndonoonth.W..I.I.""lioo,
IWS-2al
S.tond Floor Tenant Sign
On..econdory..gnlocctedontne...cond.tory
under the arch ofth.. Eo.t and w..t .leV<llion,
of Build,ng 1 and Bu,lding 2. Th..s.. ,ign, Ore to
idenlifyosingle..cond.<lorylenonlthot
occupiuotle"st50%oJ.econdIlOOf. or
oth..rwi.. approved by Landlord <lnd Cily
~
Ground Floor Tenant Sign
One.ocondory tenonT s;gn on the ground flOOf of
th.Eo.lelevotionandone.ee'mdory!enonl.ign
on the ground floe' of lh. W"st "I"vollon .."llowed
for eooh t~n"n!
BUILDING 2 WEST ELEVATION (MADISON AVENUE)
mmt
~
~
u
c:::L--
" -.....
--------~-..T.
dmIm1i:~ I h r; f- -1 ,1 ~u([7
NORTHEAST HEll
(1.5 VIEW1
8UILDING 2 . NORTH ELEVATION (INT. COURTYARD)
BUILDING 2 . SOUTH ELEVATION (LOADING AREA)
EHO PUlA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Ternecula, CA
Dale:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
Apnl 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
aMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Eledrlcal Signs And N.on
1749
Signal
( 5 6 2 )
SCALE: 1/32"=1'-0"
BUILDING 2
All Elevations
Exhibit C
--'--
I
I
PRIRY
TENANT
Max. 80% of Wall Width
,--
2'.6"
Mal(.
t.ertoer Ht.
5'.0"
Max Stocked
Copy
Heig~t
.!.!J Frazee 8730W 'loggia" (off.white)
!!1 Frozee 8732W 'Frontier Tan" (light tan)
~ Frazee 7783M "Toasted Tan" (ton)
m Frazee 8734M "Bark Mulch" (day)
m Frazee 87350 'Wild Country' (raw umber)
~ Cclort 10 be determined IJnd QPpro~ed b~ Cit>f
(See Exhibil H)
nco PUlJ\
PAINT rnICll/ S(HFrlIIl F.
SIGN PROGRAM
SIGN TYPE i:IIl PRIMARYTENANT WALL SIGN. MA<. 87.5 SQUARE FEET
FONT, AS APPROVED BY lANDLORD AND CITY.
.SPFnFI('ATIONS~ Individual reverse-pan channel letters, and illuminated chonnelletters fabricated from .063 oh>min\.Jm WIth
.090 aluminum faces. Return depth to be three (3) inches, Exterior to be painted using automotive enamel in color noted in
schedule. Internal neon, or lED illumination. No decoration of channel letter face tS permitted. Otherwise leth~, styles,
Colors, and use of Logos are subject to Landlord and City approval.
Location:
Madison Avenue ond
Sanborn Rood
Temeculo, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
SIGN TYPE, IWS.1 I
(Typ., Plocement Vories)
. . . ,r
PRIMARY
-----1'INAHT- -----
,
Revisions:
EJ
April 25, 2002
Mal' 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
m
<:jMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
, Electrical Signs And N..n
tt
1749 E 28'0 S,-
Signal Hill. CA 90755
I 56 2 ) 9 6 9 - 5 7 5 5
(800) 655.4336
fox (562) 427-6875
www signmethods com
SCALE, 3!32"~ 1'-0"
Primary Tenant Wall Sign
BUll Q.ING 1 WEST ['-<VA'nO':!
(BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION IS MIRROR IMAGE)
Exhibit D
6'.0"
Mo)(. Stacked
Copy
Height
--,-
2'-6"
Mo)(.
letter Ht
SIGN TYPE:.., 1"'U"~l:JL:JJ
ALT.
SIGN TYPE, I WS-2a
SIGN TYPE, ~
(Tvp" Placement Vanes)
Mall, 80% 0/ Woii Width
ET(O PUZA
ERe?FF PAINT rOI OR ':;r~
_~ 8730W 'loggia" (off-whitel)
i!ll 8732W "Frontier Ton" (light fan)
'~ 7783M "Toasted Ton' (tan)
ED 8734M"BarkMulch'(c1ay)
III 8735D "Wild Country" (raw umber)
[3 Colors to 6edelerminedondopproved6y
Londlord & City, (See Exhibit H)
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
SECONDARY
TENANT
SIGN PROGRAM
SECONDARY TENANT WALL SIGN. MM. 50.0 SQUARE FEET
FONT, OTHERWISE APPROVED BY LANDLORD AND CITY.
SPFC':IFICATIONS' Individual reverse-pan channel letters, and illuminated channel letters fabricated from .063 aluminum with
.090 aluminum faces. Return depth to be three (3) inches. Exterior to be painted using automotive enamel in color noted in
schedule. Internal neon, or LED illumination. No decoration of channel letter face is permitted. Otherwise Letter styles,
Colors, and use of Logos are subject to Landlord and City approval.
Dale:
April 11, 2002
All
SIGN TYPE, I WS-2a:
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
<1iMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Electrio:gl 51gna And N.on
_i
\
1749 E 26th 5t
5;9nal H;!I, CA 90755
(562) 969.5755
(800) 655-4336
Fax; (562) 427.6875
www.signmethods com
SIGN TYPE, ~
{Typ" Placement Varies}
SCALE: 1/32"= 1 '.0"
RlJ\! nlNG 1 WFST FI FVATI.ON
[BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION IS MIRROR IMAGE)
Secondary Tenant Wall Sign
ALT.
SIGN TYPE, ~
(T-fP./ Placement Varies)
Exhibit E
4'-0" Apprx.
1:;
O 00'00--
j \:, '" j,' \ '",' ,.", '.
, ,.. '. ,..i.' '.'" ! \; r." ,
\~.' "F:, '. .\ " ..' f\',: ~,. \ '::. ,: " .
;..
SIGN TYPE; r;:m::]
BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS
SCALE, 1 !2"~ 1 '.0"
1" thick PVC, painted os noted.
Numbers to be installed
flush to building fascia using VHB
tope and construction adhesive.
Two (2) sets of address numbers per
building, as indicated on elevations.
PAINT COlOR SCHEDIJI F.
J!.U Frazee 8730W "Loggia" (off-white)
,t-s-~r:l Frazee 8732W "Frontier Tan" (light tan)
;:"l'f;;l Frazee 7783M "Toasted Tan" (ton)
m Frazee 8734M "Bark Mulch" (cloy)
aJ Frazee 87350 "Wild Country" (raw umber)
-SIGN TYPE, mll
I
Ir
o
11
I~
, ,
TYPIC"::Al AnnRFSS PI A('FMFNT
SCALE, 1/16"~1'-0"
-,-EQ
-.l. EQ
EHO PUZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Locati on:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
..'.'.1
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
E.J
<!M'"
SIGN METHODS INC.
EI.drical Signs And N.on
1749 E. 28th SI.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655-4336
Fox: (562) 427-6875
www signmethods com
~
~"rTr.":'I~
Exhibit F
8'-0"
I
I
'"
BJ
SIGN ELEVATION
SIGN TYPE, !a
DOU6LE-FACED MONUMENT
SPFCIFIC:ATIONS.
m
BJ
3
...,';
Min. 200 sq. ft.
landscaping area
around base of sign.
Landscaping plan must
provide for yea Hound
color.
MOnlJmAnt sinlJ... cornice and base to be fabricated from aluminum with
lexcote paint finish as noted in schedule.
T..f1cmt ("(V)'I to be routed and backed with white acrylic. Tenant sign
cabinet to internally illuminate using f10urescent lamps.
Arldrf"s<; 'lumer(J!" to be fiat-cui-out aluminum, painted as noted, qffixed
to base of sign.
-1'-8"_
6"
r
SIGN PROFILE
(Street Side)
FRA7FF PAINT C:OIORS(:Hf=DlJlF.
EHO PUZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
I~
~
,
'r '?
, i'o
Dale:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
November 1, 2005
<5Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
ElectrlcOI Signs And Neon
1749 E. 28th St.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655-4336
Fox, (562) 427-6875
www signmethods,com
..!!.J 8 730W "Loggia" (off-white)
i~2'1 8732W "Frontier Ton" (light ton)
~ 7783M "Toosted Tan" (tan)
ED: 8734M "Bark Mulch" (clay)
III 8735D "Wild Country" (raw umber)
~ Colors to be determined arid approved by City
(See Exhibit H)
SCALE: 1/4"=1'.0"
....
Exhibit G
~ TENANT SIGNAGE COLOR SPECIFICATIONS:
The following guidelines are to be adhered to in selecting colors for site and
tenant sign age:
. Sign colors should be selected to provide sufficient contrast against building,
background colors
. Colors within each sign should be harmoniously blended
'Sign colors should be compatible with building background colors
. Signage colors should provide variety and excitement
. Color of lelter returns should controst with face colors for
a good daytime readability
. Neon colors should complement related signage elements
. Color of trim cap retainers must match the color of lelter returns
and logo returns
All sign colors are subject to review and approval by the Owner as part of the
tenant sign submiltal
3M COLORS
I WHITE #20 - TURQUOISE #236
I I IVORY #005 - EVENING BLUE #317
- BURGUNDY #49 - DARK BLUE #36
- RASPBERRY #133 - BLUE #67
- CARDINAL REP #53 - INTENSE BLUE #127
- RED #33 - PLUM PURPLE #128
- ORANGE #44 - BLACK #012
- YELLOW #015 - APPLE GREEN #106
- EMERALD GREEN #126
ACCEPTABLE COLORS FOR SIGNAGE SHOWN ABOVE.
ANY ONE SIGN MAY USE A MAXIMUM OF FOUR COLORS.
OTHER COLORS MAY BE ACCEPTABLE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
THE LANDLORD AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING OEPT.
DUPONT PAINT SYSTEMS FOR PAINTED SURFACES.
C SIGNAGE
COLORS
Exhibit H
Slgnage Detail Specificatians
~-' '.....~
E1IIII
CL - NEON 13 (CONCRETE/STUCCO WALL
W/O RACEWAY)
LISTED SIGN SECTION NEC 600.3.
CONSISTING OF INSULATING BOOTS.
II'>JSULATING SLEEVES. PLASTIC FACE,
TUBE SUPPORlS AND CHANNEL LETTER
SUITABLE FOR DA.Iv1P. WET OR OUTDOOR
lOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY
OR INDOOR lOCATIONS ONLY
~~TRIM CAP
\\: 5"
TUBE SUPPORT ____________
NEON TUBE _________
(SPACING MAINTAINED ___________
PER SPACING TABLE), .
PLASTIC FACE :.
lETTER
HEIGHT
VARIES
/
ELECTRODE INSULATING --"
BOOT. GTO INSULATING
SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH /
SIGN.
CONDUIT LOCKNUT
(TYPICAL).
,
ELECTRODE INSULATING ------------ b""".
BOOT GTO INSULATING ~
SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH '
SIGN. It
.J..:C
DRAIN HOLES IF USED IN DAM~ 7 -
WET OR OUmOOR LOCATIONS. ;
WALL VARIES IN THICKNESS .-/
AND rvtATERIAL
SEAL BUILDING PENETRATION(S) TO COMPLY wITH
APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS
LISTING MARKS
- -LISTING MARK SIGN SECTION L....SEL BE ON EACH lETTER
AND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE,
. THE FIRST BLANK SPACE IDENTlFlES THE NUMBER OF
EACH SIGN SECTION.
~ THE SECOND BLANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS.
-....
A BeT'M:EN MlJl.ATED HlGHVOllAGE wnNG AND 11 PRlMAAYWlNG N>lD 21 DEAD !\.'ETA!. ~ERE DEAD
MOA!. MllAll.ELS THE HIGH VOl'LlGE WIlliNG fOR MORE THAN 1" LENGTH.
B. saweEN NEON lU8lNG AND NEAAEsr SURFA.CE.
c. BETWEEN UNINSIJl.ATED HIGH VOLTAGE PAATS AND 1) DEAD METAlANO 211NSULATfD HIGH VOllAG'E
00 SUP~lY CONDUCTORS.
D. BfT\IlfEN UNINSUlATED HIGH VOlTAGE PAms AND I) 01HER INSUlAfED HIGH VOLTAGE PAATSAAD
21 UNIN5ULA1EO SUPPLY AND LOWVOl.1AG!: PARTS,
IVOl1AGE , , D
1001 TO 5000 112 INCH 1/4 INCH 314 INCH 1 INCH
/5001 TO 10000 314lNCH 1/4 INCH 1.1/8INCH 1.112~CH
looo1ro15000 1 INCH 1/4 INCH 1.112 INCH 2INCl1
'--
__ 114"OX2-112"NYLONANCHORS
FOUR (4) PER LETTER MIN.
____ PRIMARY ELECffilCAL SOURCE
. ~ NEC 600-5.
/"
LISTED FLEX (METAL SHOWNI AND LISTED GTO CABLE
[SECONDARY SIDE ONli). SEE DWG C6 AND C7 FOR DETAIL
REQUIREMENTS. FOR NON.METALlIC SEE DWG CM AND CIA.
!
~
f LISTED DISCONNECT SWITCH IN PRIMARY TO BE I^.1THIN
~ . GROUNDED ENCLOSURE. SIGHT (MAXIMUM 50 fT.) OF SIGN. (MANY INTERPRET
~ :. ~ ~" TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART Of SIGN)
~ ' ~ ',W NEC I TO-3(BI, 600-6.
"~.....;"....{ f--' rr I ;:~~'NG MAINTAINED PER SPACING
.~(.N: ~ SUITABLE FOR DAMP. WET. OR OUTDOOR
LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY
OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY ACCESSIBLE.
~
. ~,,<;,~ ~ FASTENERS AS REQUIRED
f;..l"~ BY LOCAL JURISDICTION
- GROUND SCREW TO BACK OF
LEmR FROM TRANSfORMER
CASE, ONE TO EACH lEmR.
NEON & CHANNEL lETIER
INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAil
~l #48-Tl DI
NOT TO SCALE
UNDERWRITERS LABOI'lATORIES
IllETAIL: NEONsvslEM
CONCRElF.WXO WAll WIO OJcrIIAY
AND lNSTAI..lA'OC>N DfWL
I JY..1E: ICAAWlNG: a-tlOO-13
1112<l'OS1~WALlw/o""""l
I SCAlE: OOT 10 SCAlE
1=NAJC<<l
JOE CAVA/.OS
\ DESIGNER: Gl
lJiolta'lOllghal~dIIIlli1I
t'tSI;HIoO()DS.AlI1ootIlIIo~
."'IIIh:lI&C/I"'pr:ltC/lIopnxU:e,aP(
~"'-<Alh;lIllllTdl""~
"""<ASI;N~
CUSTOMeR APPROV.t..LS
COMMENTS:
I~CNiNml>PPROVAL:
I ~R"S S'GNAruRE:
I~~~;':"be=~;::'"
....-.:.IlUjIIl~~
~ l'lim"'I"~_. --;;;II
DATE: DESIGNER:
I
I"". '1
I
::~.; .
,,~dCl,tI. ",,:ri!~;'
1149E,~'$!.' ." . 1~ '15b~19t9.5755
~~S~N~~n,~~CDM F<n[fg~116;~)At~15
Exhibit
Signage Detail Specifications
LISTED SIGN SECTION NEC 600.3.
CONSISTING Of INSULATING BOOTS.
INSULATING SLEEVES, PLASTIC FACE.
ruSE SUPPORTS AND CHANNEL LETTER,
SUITABLE FOR DAMp WET OR OUTDOOR
LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY
OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY.
LETTER
HEIGHT
VARIES
I
ruBE SUPPORT ______________
NEONruBE~
(SPACING MAINTAINED ~
PER SPACING TABLE(
PLASTIC fACE
ELEcmODE INSULATING /
BOOl GlO INSULATING
SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH /
SiGN.
CONDUIT LOCKNUT
ITYPICAL(
..
/;
,
ELEcmODE INSULATING ___________ ~
BOOl GTO INSUlATING _________
SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH
~, -~ ~
DRAIN HOLES IF USED IN DAMP 7
WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS. '
WALL VARIES IN THICKNESS /
AND MATERIAL
SEAL BUILDING PENElRATIOt-i(Sj TO COMPLY WITH
APPLlCASLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS
LISTING MARKS:
.. L1STNG MARK SIGN SECTION LABEL SHALL BE ON EACH
LETTER AND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE.
.. THE FIRST BLANK SPACE IDENTIFIES THE NUMBER Of
EACH SIGN SECTION.
.. THE SECOND SLANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL
NUMBER Of SIGN SECTIONS.
--
A. BEtWEENINSl.lAJED HIGHVOI.TAGE WllINGiV'jO 11 f'rl1M'RYINlNG,A.NO 2) D€AD METAl W'HERE D€AD
MM PAAAl.LELS~E HIGH VOLTAGE 'MRNG FO~ MOI'lE TH.aJ'l1' LENGTH.
B,eET'WEEN~ruil.lNGANDNEAAESTSIJlFACE.
C. B8'WEEN UNINSULATED HIGH VOlVl.GE PI\IlTS AND 1 \ 000 METAl AND 2) NSUlATED HIGH VOLTAGE
00 SUPPLY COOOUClOR5.
D. SET'WtEN UNNSULATEO HIGH VOLTAGE PA!?iS AND 11 OTHER INSULATED "UGH VOLTAGE PMTS AND
2) IJNN$ULATED SUPf'LY AND lOW VOLTAGE PAATS.
5"
IVOLIAGE A C 0
I 1001 TO 5000 1(2 INCH 1{41NCH J/4 INCH , I INCH
15001 TO 10000 3;4 INCH 1{4INCK ].1/8 INCH j.lj21NCH
100011015000 I INCH 114 INCH ].lI2INCH 2 INCH
_ ~- 1/4" 0 X 2-1/2' NYLON ANCHORS
/" fOUR (4) PER LETTER Mill.
./'" ~ PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE
NEC 600.5.
. LISTED fLEX (METAL SHOWN) AND LISTED GTO CABLE
J ~ (SECONDARY SIDE ONLY], SEE DWG C6 AND C7 FOR DETAIL
" / REQUIREMENTS. FOR NON.METALLlC SEE DWGC6AAND C7A
,
/ LISTED SIGN SECTION (CONSISTS OF TRANSFORMER AND
~ / ENCLOSURE( SUITABLE FOR DAMp WET OR OUTDOOR
GROUND WIRE LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY OR INDOOR LOCATIONS
. GROUN. DED ENCLOSURE.,. . ~ ONLY. ACCESSISLE. NEC 6DO.3. 600-5(cIlTII2), 600-7,
~ '" ' ../ . 600.B, 600-9(d(, 600.21 & 600.23, GROUNDED ENCLOSURE.
"f---...:::: LISTED DISCONNECT SWITCH IN PRIMARY TO BE WI1HIN
'- ~ ~ SIGHT (MAXIMUM 50 Fl( OF SIGN. (MANY INTERPRET
~ I--- TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART OF SIGN(
NEC 1 T D.3(B), 600-6.
. \ L SPACING MAINTAINED PER SPACING
f~:!i'i::':::""":"'":,,, " ',,- TABLE,
~ t:::::...._ ~ai~i;,,;;;)\ SUITABLE FOR DAMP, WET. OR OUTDOOR
_ ~';d::>:'~",:\ LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY
.... . ."" OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY. ACCESSIBLE.
~ FASTENERS AS REQUIRED
BY LOCAL JURISDICTION
- GROUND SCREW TO SACK OF
LETTER FROM TRANSfORMER
CASE. ONE TO EACH LETIER
INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC AND LOCAL ELECTRICAL CODE,
CHANNEL lEITER
INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAil
JL #48-Tl D
UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES
Nono SCALE
I o;~N CHANNEL LETlERS I
I',"> I DRAWING: a..Jroi.16 I
llMJ1l5 ((XN:,OCWIlJ.WIlRAC1WO)
jSCALE NOTlOSCALE I
I COORDINAJOR' JOE CAVAlOS I
I OOlGNEl>. G\ I
~1It1'l0*J"'d~~
bVSlGNr.EJHJOS.AI~IO~
~nwhole(tnpcJlcxloplClO..ee.av
IerletIlleleol~lel'I'lCt1ltle~
~al~WlH:lDS.
CUSIOIt.m APDROV/\LS
COMMENIS:
I~ERlYc:MNffiAPflRO.lAl:
I ~tJmS SIGWffiJRE:
11hl~.~alooontlo:1
l ::::'~::::~__Hro~
I REV. If ~:~D DESlGNER:-
Exhibit
Signage Detail Specifications
..
RCL - NEON - 17 (CONC/STUC WALL WIO RACEWAY)
LETTER
HEIGHT
VARIES
TUBE SUPPORT _________ .
(SPACING ~1~~1~~6 ________ .~ ~~~ "
PER SPACING TABLE]. I .
REVERSE PAN CHANNEL l-
LEITER D90 ALUMINUM FACES /
063 AlUMINUM RETURNS
iB
ELECmODE INSULATING ./f
BOOT. GTO INSULATING ! ....
SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH. /
SIGN
CONDUIT LOCKNUT
(TYPICAL)
CLEAR LEXA.N BACK
ELEcmODE INSULATING _______
BOOT. GTO INSULATING ____
SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH
SIGN
~=~
1
----;;;i.:'"
1" Xl" CUP RIVETED TO LEXAN ~~,
BACK AND ATIACHED TO SIDE WI :
#8 x 'F PHilLIPS SCREW. .Ji?~
LIGHT D(FFUSION -----
I SEAL BUILDING PENETRATION(S) TO COMPLY W. ITH
APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS
LISTING MARKS:
- LISTING JlAARK SIGN SECTION lABEL BE ON EACH LI::TTER-
AND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE.
- THE FIRST BlANK SPACE IDENTIFIES THE NUMBER OF
EACH SIGN SECTION.
_ THE SECOND BLANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS.
--
A. 8fTWEEN lNSW'-IEO Ii~ VOltAGE \\l'!I'llNG AND 11 PRIMARY WING AND 21 DEAD METAL ~ERE DEAD
MElAl. pAA.A.l,Etsrne IiIGIi va,TAGE 'W1RING FOR MORE lW\N 1. LENGTR
B. BET'WEENNEONTUllIo\GANONEAAESTSURFACE
C, B~EN UNINSUL/l.1ED Ii'GIol VOLTAGE PAATS AND I) DEAD METAl AND 21INSUl)l,TED HJGI' VOLTAGE
OR SUPPLY CONt:'UCTORS
D, 8ETWEEHUNJ'jSULATEDIilGl;VOlTAGEPAA1SAND110T}lERINSUlATEDHIGKVOlTAGEPAATSAN0
2JUNINSULAT<DSlfl'f'l\.ANDlOW\iOlTAGEPAATS
I VOLTAGE C 0
r 1/4",0 X 4.1/2' DR\WAll SCREW 1 1001 TO 5000 1r2INCH !/4IHCH 314 INCH I INCH
FOUR (4) PER LETTER MIN. 1 SOOl TO llXXlO 3/4INCK 1/41NCfI 1.1/6INCK 1.l!1INCtj
1100011015000 , INCH 1/4INCK 1.1121NCtj 21NCIi
_________ RACEWAY HOUSING.
CLASS 2 TRANSFORMER ______
II I'
1: .~""'-"",'-:';' ,.:--,'-..,.-~~ -lISTEDFlEX(METALSHOWN)ANDlISTEDGTOCA8lE
lh) '---' ('t,"';.:,..;. '.'1:...>. n i (SECONDARY SIDE ONlYI. SEE DWG C6 AND C7 fOR DE1AIl
If _ ~,_<,:,~ l..1' ;". REQUIREMENTS. FOR NON-METALLIC SEE DWG C6AANDC7A
- ' ,c':'; _:;-;:-._,..~~~' ______ LISTED DISCONNECT SW1TCH IN PRIMARY TO BE WlTHIN
ill _' SIGHT (MAXIMUM 50 fTI Of SIGN. (MANY INTERPRET
lI' ~ TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART OF SIGN)
NEe 11 0.3lB), 600.6
SPACING MAINTAINED PER SPACING
TABLE.
~ SUITABLE FOR DAMP, VVEr. OR OUTDOOR
lOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY
OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY. ACCESSIBLE.
- GROUND SCREW TO BACK OF
LEnER FROM TRANSFORMER PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE
CASE _ OI-lE '0 EACH LETIER NEC 600.5
: ~ WAll VARIES IN THICKNESS
AND MATERIAL
NEON & CHANNEL lETTER
INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAil
Ul #48
UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES
NOTTO SCALE
NOTE: 12 VOLTS SYSTEM DOES
NOT CARRY (REQUIRE)
A GREEN GROUND WIRE.
10",," NEONSVSTEM 1
CONCISTOCC WALL W/O RACPNA
I AND INstAllATION DETAIl
1000TE: 100AW1NG:IlO.-Imi-17 I
Il/2OlOO~WAU.wroJ1.6C8't'AY)
1= NOTlOSCALE I
I COORDINAJOIl: JOE CA,vAlf)S I
1- ~ I
"*It<l"lOllgh:ll~d8slgn
I7(SlGNI.EIt<<XlS.AI~t;!1IlplI:ldXe
R"'l'lI1Ol8a"'pmorloproctlc&Q1V
~lh8leorn:.lllllT'ldlllhe~
lllTIelSlGNr.ETI<<XlS.
COMMENIS;
I ~PERlY OWNffi APPROVAl.;
I~EIrSSGNAruRE
I....... ,.h .~olaOOllJl:X:l
~Iftl"'rdbll_hbpo:dx:f\:lll
-.;JIlI""""'''",--
~Re....
""'",,_u
DAlE: DESIGNER:
Exhibit
...."- '~~
Signage Detail Specifications ~ I
THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. THIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF THE SIGN.
LISTED SIGN SEGION NEC 600.3
CONSISTING OF IN$ULIl.TING BOOTS,
INSULATING SLEEVES, ALUM. FACE, TUbE
SUPPORTS AND REVERSE PAN CHANNEL LETTER.
SUITABLE FOR OAMp' WET OR OUTDOOR
lOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY
OR INDOO~ LOCATIONS OI~LY
i.\..:./tfti.
i\<;,\fi'
TUBE suppa'T ________Ill ~Ii:
I~ ~,,:
HEOrJTu8E SPACINGSMAINTAlrJW .. .11 ='.,.,i;'
PER SPACING TABLE I . I = .~,
ALUMINUM OR SHEET METAL fACE ~ ~ '1 ~'
LEITER
HEIGHT
V ARI ES
CLEA'LExN,BACK ~'l- ..
ELECTRODE INSULATING BOOT GTO I
,""
ItlSULATING SLEEvf: PROVIDED WITH
SIGN I
,
COrJDUIT LOCKNUT (TYPIC/.,Ij ~
DRAI'JHOlESIFUSEDINDANtPWET~ I ~=t
OR ouRDOOR LOCATIONS ~ I ~
~
- - -- -
VIALL VARIES Iri THICKNESS AND
MATERIAL
SEAL BUILDING PENETRATIONS TO
COMPLY WITH APPUCABLE BUILDING
CODE REQUIREMENTS
~ LISTED
LISTING MARKS:
LISTING MARK SIGN SECTION LABEL
SHALL BE ON EACH LETTER AND
TRANSFORMER ENCLOSLlRE. THE FIRST
BLANK SPACE IDENTIFIES THE NUM8ER
OF EACH SIGN SECTION. THE SECOND
BLANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS.
(OR OTHER ACCREDITED
TESTING LABORATORY]
ELECTRIC SIGN SECTION
NO. XX.123456
00'0
1/4" X 3" NYLON ANCHORS. MIN_ FOUR (4) IH LEITER.
INCLUDf3PACER
PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE, rlEe 60C.S
r LISTED DISCONNECT SWITCH IN PRIMARY TO B~ WITHIN SIGHT IMAl:,
r 50 FT] Of SIGN. (MANY INTERPRET TRANSFORMER ~NClOSURE TO
BE PART Of ~IGNI NEe 110.315) 600.6
/ ~ LISTED FLEX {METAL SHOWNI AND LISTED GTO CABLE ISECONDARY
SIDE ONlYI, SEE DWG C6 AND C7 FOR DETAil REQUIREMENTS, FOP.
/ NON METALLIC m DWG C6AAND C7A.
/; - SPACINGS MAINTAINED PER SPACING TABLE
- LISTED SIGN SECTION tCmJSISTS OF TRArmORMER AND
ENCLOSURE) SUITABLE fOROAMp, WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS
UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY LOCATIONS ONLY. ACCESSIBLE NEe 600.
: 3,600.5{clllH21.600.7,60Q.8,600.9Idi,6QQ.21 &600.23
GROUNDED EI~GOSURE
rFASTENERS REQUIRED BY
LOCAL JURISDICTION
SPACING TABLE,
A BETWEEN INSULATED HIGH VOLTAGE WIR1NGAND (1) PRIMARY WIRING AND (2) DEAD METAL
WHERE DEAD METAL PARAllElS THE HIGH VOLTAGE WIRING FOR MORE THAN l'LENGTf1
B BETWEEN NEON TUBING AND NEAREST SURFACE.
C. BETWEEN UNINSULATED HIGH-VOlTAGE pARTS AND (lj OEAD METAL AND (2) INSULATED HIGH
VOlTAGE OR SUPPLY CONDUGORS
D BETWEEN UNINSULATED HIGH-VOLTAGE PARTS AND (1) OTHER INSULATED HIGH.VOLlAGE
PARTS AND (2) UNINSULATED SUPPLY AND lOW VOLTAGE PARTS
VOLTAGE A B I C i
1001 TO 5000 112 INCH 1/4INCH- 3/4INCH--
SOOlT010000 3/4 INCH 1/4(NCH I 1-1/8INCH I
100011015000 1 INCH 1/4 INCH I j.1/2INCH I
-ll:CH "-1
1.I/2lNCH I
21NCH i
I SIGN SECTION
UL48-T1 D
,
N!ONH.OJ.OII.l.UMli'I.O.nO"
1PACflll.1f1"OFFWAll
PROJECT:
HALO LIT LETTERS
LOCATION,
N/A
I DATE IORAW1NG
11/19/051 HALO LIT lETTERS
'I SCALE
NOTE[)
I SALES,
N/A
IOEJIGNER
I GI
This is 0'1 ongmal unpublished
design by SIGN METHODS.
All rights to reproduce it in
whole or in pari or 10 produce
any likeness thereof shall
(emain the exclusive right of
SIGN METHODS.
CUSTOMER APPROVALS
COMMENTS:
I PxROPERTY OW~~ER APPROVAL
I :USTOMER'S SIGNATURE
h~~tP3ldQc:am:r
~<n:l"llllrdbll"""',*,~
lOI1:Utu.olt'~
REVISIONS
NUMBER: DATE DESIGNER
IJedrlcal SIIJn&AIId Neon
17~9 E. 28th SI Tel. (562) 9~9-5;S5
SignoIH,II, CA90'55 (800)655--4336
WWWSt9nm.thcd,",mF~,. (5621 ~27.68i5
Exhibit
,,_, ~""F
Slgnage Detail Specifications
CL
.:lI
LED
I
04 (CONCRETE/STUCCO
WALL W/O RACEWAY)
WAll MATERIAL DETERMINED ~
ON SITE DURING INSTALLATION
FINISHED SURFACE DEPENDS ___________ -
ON STRUCTURE OF EXISTING ~
BUILDING ON SITE 5" '
TRIM CAP ~
12 VOlTS D.C
L.E.D. STRIPS
CUT AS REQUIRED
~~'"
"
114" 0 X 4' N'I1.0N ANCHORS
141 PER LETTER MIN.
/ PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE
NEC 6DD 5
/
./
12 VOLTS DC fOR LED UNITS, QIY AS REQUIRED
SECONDARY WIRE # 1B AWG CABLE.
~ ~
PLASTIC FACE \ \ I
(COLOR DETERMINED \
BY COMPANY OR . \ .\
ORGANIZATIONS
TRADEMARK) .
~,~j;,!t- ,",~:,;,
I ~:~~;;~0.\
L.E D SCREWED"""'-., I ~ &~~~[\
TO CHANNEL LETTER BACK ~ ,1.(/1;1
o~~~ir~~:~~~~ '~'"" 'J ~ c
~:~~~:~7 - ; \ ,,,.,,:,_~~
14)PERlETTERMN
CLASS 2 TRANSfORMER
! LISTED SIGN SECTION (CONSISTS OF TRANSFORMER AND
ENCLOSURE). SUITABLE FOR DAMP. WET OR O. UTDOOR lOCATIONS
UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY.
ACCESSIBLE
NEC 600.3. 600.5Ic)[I)[21. 600-7. 600.8, 600-9(d),
600.21 & 6OD-23 GROUNDED ENCLOSURE
LETTER
HEIGHT
VARIES
:::
____ LISTED DISCONNECT SWITCH IN PRIMARY TO BE WITHIN
SIGHT [MAX 5D fT.) Of SIGN. [NOTE: MANY INTERPRET
TRANSfORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART Of SIGNj
NEC 110.3\B), 600.6
rFASTENERS AS REQUIRED
_, BY LOCAL JUSRISDICTION,
:'-t'"
'i~
"'1----
WAll VARIES IN THICKNESS AND MATERIAL ~
12 VOLTS DC FOR L.E.D. UNITS
(QUATITY AS REQUIREDj, SECONDARY
WIRE #18 AWG CABLE.
1 SEAL BUILDING PENETRATION(S) TO COMPLY WITH
I APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS,
LISTING MARKS:
- LISTING MARK SIGN SECTION LABEL BE ON EACH LETTER
AND TRANSfORMER ENClOSlIRE,
- THE fiRST BLANK SPACE IDENTIfiES THE NUMBER Of
EACH SIGN SECTION.
_ THE SECOND BLANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL
NlIMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS.
L.ED. & CHANNEL LETTER
INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAIL
UL #48
UNDERWRITERS lABORATORIES
NOTTO SCALE
NOTE: 1 2 VOLTS SYSTEM DOES
NOT CARRY (REQUIRE)
A GREEN GROUND WIRE.
I DETAJC LE.O. S<SIEM I
WIO RACEWAY & 3 PLYWAll
ANa INSWlATION DEfAJL
I LWE: 10000\\1NG: Cl-lfD<l4 I
11/'2Q'05 LE.O.W-AACel3PlVWAll
'I SCALE: NOT 10 SCALE I
IWE ~A I
I OESGNER: GI I
1lW1Ia'\~~~
~.!iQ.j'-'1EJKl[:6,AI~b~
~l'l-.moleOll'lpatortoprodJ::$,~
~1h9reoflhall8mCJnlh9~
lI!1TIofSIGNt.1ETOClOO
CUSiOMtR APPRO'lAlS
COMMENTS:
PROPERTY ONNER APPROVAL:
x
I~MER'SSIGNAJ1JRE:
I
h...... .~(ltQ~!
~~-=~~~ i
--~:aJllII""'R_
REV.' DATE:
OESGNER:
Exhibit
d
CL - NEON - 12 (CONC/STUCCO WALL
W/RACEWAY)
Signage Detail Specifications
LISTED SIGN SECTION NEC 600.3.
CONSISTING OF INSULATING BOOTS.
INSULATING SLEEVES, PLASTIC FACE,
TUBE SUPPORTS AND CHANNEL LETTER,
SUITABLE FOR DAMP, WET OR OUTDOOR
LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY
OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY. I
-....
A. BElWEEN INSlAATED I-ftGH VOllAGE'IMt>lG AND 1) PI1lMAAY'MNG MO~) DEAD MET.o.L ~ERf DEAD
MElALPAAPlliLSTHE HIGH VOlTAGE 'MRING KlRMOIlE ftW..I 1" LENGTH,
B. BElWEENNEONTIJ8INGANDNEAAESTSURFAC!:
C. BflWEEN lNlNSlIlAIEO HIGH VOLTAGE PAATS AND 11 DEAD METAlANO 2) INSUlATED HGH VOlTAGE
00 9JPPlV CONDUCTORS,
O. BEiW'i'EN UN!NSUlATED HIGH VOLTAGE PAATS AND 1) OTHm lNSULA1ED HI~ VOLTAGE MilTS AND
2] UNIN5LJ'.ATEO StJPl'lYANO LOW VOLTAGE PARIS.
TRIM CAP
'10l1fl.G't
,
c
D
5"
1001105000
50011010000
10001101,SOOO
1l2INCH
\/4 INCH
3{41IJCr!
IlNeH
314 INCH
llNeH
HIS INCH
'.112 INCH
1.1(.'~,OI
ZINCH
1/4 INCH
1/4 INCH
TUBE SUPPORT _______________
NEON TUBE ~
(SPACING MAINTAINED ~
PER SPACING TABLE).
PLASTIC FACE
_____1/4' 0 X 2.1/2" NYLON ANCHORS
FOUR (4) PER LETTER MI'~ RACEWAY HOUSING.
~ ~
,;;- - LISTED FLEX (METAL SHOWN) AND LISTED GTO CABLE
(SECONDARY SIDE ONLY), SEE DWG C6 AND C7 FOR DETAIL
REQUIREMENTS. FOR NON-METAlLIC SEE DWG CM AND C7 A.
~ LISTED DISCONNECT SWITCH IN PRIMARY TO BE WITHIN
SIGHT (MAXIMUM 50 FT.) Of SIGN. (MANY INTERPRET
~ TRANSfORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART Of SIGN)
NEC 11 0.3(B), 600.6
SPACING MAINTAINED PER SPACING
'" TABLE.
~. "'- SUITABLE FOR DAMP, WET, OR OUTDOOR
LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED fOR DRY
OR INDOOR LOCAT!ONS ONLY ACCESSIBLE.
PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE
NEC 600.5,
~
LETTER
HEIGHT
VARIES
ELECTRODE INSULATING /
BOOT GTO INSULATING
SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH. /
SIGN~
CONDUIT LOCKNUT
(l'IPICAL),
'j-J
..b-t -
DRAIN HOLES IF USED IN DAMP, J
WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS. /
WAlL VARIES IN THICKNESS ..../ eifffii
AND MATERIAL . ty
[SEAL BUILDING PENETRATION(S) TO COMP'S W. ITH
APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS
LISTING MARKS
. LISTING MARK SIGN SECTION LABEL BE ON EACH LETTER
AND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE.
. THE FIRST BlANK SPACE IDENTIfiES THE NUMBER OF
EACH SIGN SECTION.
.1 THE SECOND BLANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS.
ELECTRODE INSULATING ~
BOOT. GTO INSULATING _________
SLEEVE PRO~DED WITH
SIGN
GROUND SCREW TO BACK OF
LETTER FROM TRANSFORMER
CASE. ONE TO EACH LETTER.
NEON & CHANNEL lETTER
INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAil
Ul #48
UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES
NOTTO SCALE
NOTE: 12 VOLTS SYSTEM DOES
NOT CARRY (REQUIRE)
A GREEN GROUND WIRE.
lDEfAJC NEON S'ISlEM I
CONCISl\IC WAlL W/AACPNAY
AND INS1AUATlON DETAIL
I DAlE' jDRAWlNG;Cl-tf0N.12 I
111= ICOOCil1OCWIllW~CEW")
I SCAlE: NOT TO SCALE ,
I COORDI~TOR: JOE CAI/AlOS I,
I DESIGNER, GI I
1Ns.171~~d9lQ1
bvSK;N~A1rtg111lo~
ttl'l\'lholeoorr,patQ'Itl~Q"f(
Jer'l8IIl'ltlIeof ltd.lB'T'd'I1h& IlIlI::t.M
D:;/hIorSK;N~
CUSTO~'ER APPROVAlS
C:QIIAM9m:
1~CM'NERN'fIROVAL
I ;um1vlfR'S SIGNA.1WE:
~.. ,",. lapatQfaeonl\a::t
~lnlwlOOl'tlll~..."prod:dbo
l'III'oJIoo..o,erl~
N_lWIlI _
REV. # DAlE:
DESIGNER:
Exhibit
Signage Detail Specifications
-
THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. THIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF THE SIGN.
~
- --- ~l)(~
~ .
DRAIN ~OLES IF USED IN OAM~ ________ . ~..,~ 1
WETOROUTOOORLOCATIONS ~~.
I"XI"ClIPRIVETEDTOLEXANBACKANOATTAOIEDTO ..
SIDE WITH #B X W P~ILlIPS SCREWS
U5nOSIGN [CDHSISlI Df POWERSUPPLX CHANNEl LEl1!RS, PLlITIC
FACE,TUBESUPPORTS, CCNDUIT, AHDGlASSCUPORf NSUlATING BOOT IF
PROVIDED,AND D1SCONNECTSWlTOIIF PROVIDED, AND INSULATIIfG SlEE'lE If
PROVI[)EOj,SUlTABLE FORoumOOR LoUnON UNLESS MARKEO FOR INOOORONLY
RECOGNIZEDCOMPONEHT PlASTIC fACE ~ ----=
TUBESUPPORTPERNEC600.33[b)~_
NEONTUBE{SPACINGMAINTAINE~
PER SPACING TABLE) ~
CLEAR LElAN BACK __________ .
LETTER
NEIGHT
VARIES
MECHANiCAl CONNECTION [lWlmO OX) __________
1.I/TINMIN.ClEARANCETHROUGH
AIR OR ACROSS SURfACE TD TUBE
CDNNmION. NEC60~34[bl
OR.
GIASSCUPORINSUIATlNGOOOT___________
(NOREQUIREDSPACINGI -----....
I SEAlBUILDINGPENETRATlON(S)TOCDMPLYWIT~
APPUCABLEBUILDINGCDDEREOUIREMENTS.
LISTING MARKS,
~ LISTING MARX SIGN smToN LABEL SHALL BE ON EACH
LmER AND TRANSfORMER ENCLOSURE.
~ THE flRSTBIANK SPACE IOENTlflESTHE NUMBER Of
EACH SIGN SECTION
~ THESECONOBLANKSPACEINDlCATESTHETOTAL
NUMBER Of SIGN SECTIONS.
___________ D!SCONNEa SWITCH. MAY BE
REM01E[WEATHERPROOf
IfOUTDODRSI.NEC600.1
--
A. BEl'M'EN i'lSu(AlfD~VOI.lAGEWIlNG ~ \i PRJNl/lYWNGNlll21 ~MEW WHl'RE DEAD
ME1AJ.p.o,AAilll.S!lEHGHVOI.W>l'~'OllMO!lElIWll'lENGIH.
l,enwa:NNEONJVBNGNlDNEAAE:iI~N:<.
C.8ETWEENlN'ISI..I.AlHlftGH\IOI.lolGEI'AAI'l.N(JIIDEADME!Al.AN02jNSlU.11:DHlGH\lCl.lW",,!
(fI!IJIl'lYCOODlJC1OrlS.
D,!ElI\W!U~SlUJ'EDHI<lHI'Ol.!'.G'EFWlTSill'VllQ1l;Ent.lSlJJoll!DHlGHVOI.I/lGEPAA1S.oMi
2)UN,.SUu\ttDSlJ'PlYiWDtcWVOl~EPAA1S,
. _______ PRIMARY ElEaRlCAlSOURCE
/" (V, IN. MIN. CONDUIT, METAL
- SHOWNI.NEC600.6&600.11
1="" ,
110(1110SOCl:l ',(.lINOi 1{41NOi 3iAINCH 'K"
1!'.OOIlOIOCOD 3JAI~ 1141N01 1.118rNCH l;,(lI~H
11Q:)JllO)~ '''' l{~~ I.WINCH '""
---
.
~
('I
~
'..
~
"
-~
\1
~
SPACINGS MAINTAINED PER SPACING TABLE
"-
';--IW ITKSCREWS(#TO)WITHSPACERS
/
~6"X4'XJ/4'SOU'RETUBEfOR
/' VERTICAL WINDOW fRA~E
T/4' 1EK SCREWS (#TD) WITH SPAcrRS
OVERHEAD VIEW
NOTTOSCAII
UL #48-E4A
FRONT AND BACK LIT
SELF-CONTAINED CHANNEL LETTER
WITH ENCLOSURE SIGN FACE DETAIL (NEON)
NOTroSCALE
UNDERWRITERS LABORATO!(IES
@und'rwril'rs'
.l LabGratGrI.~ Inc.
EL!C1IlICSK"..N
UJ.1Id.._......_IIoIll._
III.m,__...-,III._
~,""_IIo/:Ol~
I PROJECT. nOHUHC&l,CXur
mHCMIAlNfllO\l.NMELlffiER
WitH EM(LMU~! SHill FA(E(NEONI
I DATE: IDAAWING:
11/19/05 DETAIL
lSCllLE' NOTED
jSAlES
NfA
I DESIGt~ER
GI
This is an original
unpublished design by
SIGN METHODS. All
rights to reproduce it in
whole or in part or to
produce any likeness
thereof shall remain the
excluSive right of SIGN
METHODS.
CUSTOM~R APPROVALS
COMMENTS:
I P~ROPERTY QWNEP, APPROVAL
I :USTOMER'S SIGNATURE
@2005SignMethQd$,lnc.
Th".~"Ii""'~"""'.p"'po<!yofS'g'
Mo!hod"I"'.$<Il""'~II.CJ.ond'Mlln"'bo"'04
o<dypli<GlO..i,"'I"'F""'..;'hoLllf""""",,,',,"
_on"'"'."'of""o"",,,"Io<l,~..,.o,
Sig"_""I"<.....rorc:oobI.Oy,""""~h"o-
NUMBER:
1
DATE: , DESIGI'JER.I
02124/05 MB
REVISIONS
GlKi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
(l",rloaF SIgn. And Neon
1749E.28thSf 1.1:(562)989.$;55
Signal Hill, CA907SS (800)655.4336
www,'i9'"methods.coml'<n(562)421.6875
Exhibit
Signoge Detail Specifications
101
THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTAllED IN ACCORDANCE W11H THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELEClRlCAl CODE
AND/OR OIHER APPUCAllLE LOCAl CODES. IHIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF IHE SIGN.
umo SIGN (CONStm Of POVlQ SU?PLl, CK~IINEL lfnu.s, PU,'i.'\\{
FACE,TUBESUPPORU, CONDUIT,ANO GLASSOJPORINSULATINGBDOTIF
PROVIDfD,AND DISCONNEO SWITCH IF PROVlDEU,AND INSUlATING SlEEVE IF
PROVlOEO).5U1TABLE FOR OUTDOOR LOCATlON UNLESSM.l.RKEO FOR INDOOR ONLY
RECOGNIZfOCOMPONENTPLA5TICFACE~
1UB[SUP'0R1PERNEC600'lllhl~.-
NEONruBEIsPACINGMAINTAlNE~
PER SPAClNG TABLEj ~
lmER
~EIG~T
VARIEI
~
~1
~
~;
;It;
MECHAHICAl CONNECTION [TWISTED OKI --------------. ~
1.\11" IN MIN,ClEARANCETHROUGH '-z
A1RORACROI\SURfAC!101UBE ~
CONHEITIOH. NEC600.34(h) .
OR "
GLAS\(UPDRIHI;LATlHGBOO1 _________ ~O, -
(NO REDUIREO SPACING) ______
~
I
DRAINHOLESIFUIEDIHOAMP'~
WIT OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS.
lEAl aUllOlNG PENURATION\I) TO COMPl' WI1H
APPLICABLE BUILDING CQOE REQUIREMENTS,
LlS1IHGMARKI,
_ US1ING MARK SIGN SECTIOH LABEl IHAll BE ON EACH
lIT1ERANO TRANlfORMER ENCLOSURE
_ THEFIRS1BLANK SPACElDENTlFIEIlHE NUMBER Of
EACHIIGNIKTION.
_ THE SECOND BLANK SPACElNDlCA1ES THE10TAl
NUMBEROFSIGNIEalONS.
______ DISCONNECT IWI1CH. MAY BE
______ REMOTE (WEA1HERPRODf
If OUTDOORS). N!C600.2
-...
"'I.ETWI'ENINSULATEDHiGHVOlTAGEII'JllN(;A~IiPll\.loW>l'wt;GAND2IDEADMflAlWHEREDl/lD
WIt\IO.~'I1<\4iGll~WI1t<G~OI<M(lIll,1'tW'Il.l!;N",'>l
SIDM',N,*ONTUIlt;G>>lD,*AIl.ESlSUlFACE
c, BETWEfN UlltlSUIJ.TEO I-lIGH VOlTAGE PAAlS/INl) liDE.AD~ElAI.Af'()2Im.lOTEO~IGH\'OI.IAGf
OIlSUPl'lYCClN';JUC:""~
0_ ~Th\I!:'iI'"lNl'~RII<IG"vo..lJ/;c PAA1S....m 11 Cln<ER INSU\.A1W HG" VClI""! P-<J111 AND
21 UNINSUWED Slf'l'l1ltmlOWl'OlTAGf PAIl!;
~PRIMARlElH1RI(AlIOURCE
. 1~IH.MIN.CDNDUI1,ME1A1
""- IHGWM) NEC 600-6& 600-11
11/0l1i'4[
/1001105000 1121~ 114 INCH ol~I~" 1 INCH
1500\1010000 ~I~~ lJ~1Ir..J.\ \.\~INC~ \.\Y.11-lCl<
IIOO:Jlrol~ '"" II'I~ 1112tl~ 21NC~
---------- fl[10~IRING(OMPAR1M[N1
El[(lRDNICPDWERSUPPll
S"CINGI MAINTAINED PER S"C1NG TABLE
7 1/4' NllDNANCHORIfOR All nPEOF WAllS IMIN.Df41.
PLUS MIN. OFDNE 3/8' TOGGLE FOR STUCCO WAll IDRI
MIN.OFON~5fJ6' EXPANSION AliCHOR fOR CONCRETE WALL
/ l18' 10GGltlNO SIIb' ElPAHlmN IN(NORI lREfOR
/ LETTERSOVER4'-O'H1GH
SELf-CONTAINED CHANNEL LETTER
WITH ENCLOSURE SIGN fACE DETAIL (NEON'
NOTTOlCAlE
I UL #48-E4A
UNDERWRITERS LABOAAiORIES
I~Und.rwrit.~
-L hbaratoneslnc.
ElE<:mo::~<iN
v.l.lnlllL.....lII<l'.lll._
w.tlal~_OIII'lll._
_...__CM~
PROJECT
SElJ.(ONTAINED CHANHEllE11'ER
WITll ENCLOSURE SIGN fACE (NEON)
OHi:. I DRAWING
11/19/05 D~TAIL
SCMi:
NOTED
SALES
I N/A
IDESIGtlER
GI
I This is an original
unpublished design by
SIGN METHODS. All
Ii ;"ights to reproduce it in
"..hole or In part or to
produce any likeness
thereof sholl remain the
exc:\us"lve right of SIGN
METHODS
I PxROPERTY QWNER APPROVAL
1 :USTOMER'S SIGNATURE.
I \ his draWing j document
is 0 part of a contrad
Cl9reemen\, and wi\1 not
be released into
produdion without buyer's.
aulhoriz.otion
RE.V1StON
NUMBER" DATE
DESIGNER,
\
~tGN"Mttk... ...:.a;:. ~_,
lleclrlcClISlgnlAnlfNeon
1749 E. 28th St Tel. (562)989.5755
SignolKoII.O,'10J55 18(0)6.%.<\336
.,...,. ';9""m~"'Qd..<omfw' 1562) 427.6875
Exhibit
EHO PUZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
ROUGH NOTES COMP,LED 6Y JAMIE & GREG ISLAS FOR INTERNAL 'JSE
(FROM TEMECULA SIGN ORDINANCE(
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
FRFFSTANIJING SIG:NS NOTFS",
5' SETBACK OR 17' FROM FACE OF CURB (WHICHEVER IS LESS)
OUTSIDE SITE VISITIUTY AREA
PERP TO STREET, EXCEPT AT END OF CUL.DE.SAC
150 FT BETWEEN SIGNS
MEASURE HT FROM NEAREST H.ARDSCAPE - BERf'AI'iG UP TO 2 FT IN ADDN TO MAX f-T-AlLQWED
FLOO) LIGHTING ENCOURAGED
SAME BACKGROUND COLOR ALL TENANTS
CENTER ID SIGNS SHALL BE ONE.SIDED. OTHERS TWO.SIDED
LANDSCAPING ~ 300 S.F AROU~D BASE IIF FWY.ORIENTED), IF NOT, 100 IF CENTER ID, 200 IF MULTI-TENANT
Date:
April 11, 2002
INClUDE FLOWERING PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, OR OTHER COLOR PLAWS. YR.ROUND COlOR REQ.'D.
ADDRESS REQUIRED - NOT COUNTED IN AREA
ILLUMINATION, ONLY COPY TO ILLUMINATE. NO OVERALc FACE ILLUM.
Revisions:
NO EXTERNAL ILLUM FOR MJlTI-TENANT SIGNS
NOTE SIGN WIJTH (DEPTH?( TAELE
WAil SI(;NS N()TFS
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June '26, 2003
r.ovember 1, 2005
MM. OF 4 PER BUSINESS PER SICE
DESCENDING AREAS PE, SIGN~SEE 17.20.15
MIN 6" LETTER HEIGHT. 6" FOR STACKED Copy
INT IllUM. CHANNEL LffiERS, HALO
NO EXTERNAL ILLUM. IS PERMITTED.
<:iM/~
SIGN METHODS INC.
Electrical Signs And Neon
1-888-TEMECULA
1749 E. 28th St.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655-4336
Fax (562) 427-6875
www signmethods com
ATTACHMENT NO.2
APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza. Sign Revislon\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-06\PC STAFF REPORTdoc
8
,'~
--"<"'I
Sign
Program
ETtO
Plaza
MADISON AVENUE AND SANBORN ROAD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
,,'
Prepared For:
ErCO Investments, LLC
540 Westminster Mall
Westminster CA 92683
CONDITIONALLY
AP PRO VE 0 by the City of Temecula
Planning Director
~nnlnp l,?mmls:,I~~rC 2&i?
City CouncIl on~-I:J!h Findings tunlained I
subject to e , and
in Resolution No
the Conditions of Approval ,
'b't A
Exhl I - . .,' , . 1 1. ,
Case No. f'!1fJi--O 3Z-"'1J1.IJ.t}: ~~\ .
Date Case Plannrr.+ ~,,~. 0 3~
FilE COpy
Prepared By:
ciiNli'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Eleclrh:al 51gna And Neon
] 749 28th Street
Signal Hill CA 90755
June 26, 2003
Sign Criteria
Subject
Guidelines, Directory, and Vendors
Purpose and Intent
General landlord / Tenant Requirements
,
General Specifications
Prohibited Signs
Sign Types
Graphic Exhibits
Site Plan
Building 1 All Elevations
Building 2 All Elevations
Wall Signs (Primary Tenonts)
Wall Signs (Secondary Tenants)
Building Address Numbers
Multi-Tenant Monument
~,
~
"
ETC6 PLAZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Page
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
2
2
2
3
3
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
A
B
C
..'.;..."l....I. 0
.'1';..~4 E
.'I'H.. F
.l'll.J~'. G
Aprd 25, 2002
May] 3, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
Maren 24, 2003
Apdl 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
<:liME
SIGN METHODS INC.
ll.ctricl:Il Sign, And Neon
1749 E. 26th SI.
5ignol Hill, CA 90755
1562) 989.5755
(600) 655-4336
Fox: (562) 427-6875
www.sjgnmethods.com
N D E X
SIGN GUIDElINES, DIRECTORY, AND VENDORS
A. SIGN GUIDELINES
MANUFACTURE: All signs must be U.L, Approved ond
conform to the Electrical code and any municipal building
codes.
COLORS & FINISHES: Colors and finishes must be of highest
quality over properly primed surfaces and are subject to
owner approval.
INTERIOR SIGNS: Interior signs may not be visible from 0
public street and ore not regulated by this program unless
they are pertinent to or attached to a window.
REQUIRED SIGNS: Tenont is required to provide ond
maintain in good condition at least one wall sign and suite
identification sign in conformance with this program during
the term of tenant's lease.
8. DIRECTORY
PROJECT:
ETC 0 PI020
Madison Avenue & Sanborn Road
Temecula CA
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
ETCO Investments, LLC
540 Westminster Moll
Westminster CA 92683
(714) 379-3279 Phone (714) 379-9223 Fax
ARCHITECT:
Konrad Rieger and Associates
40440 Carmelite Circle
Temecula CA 92591
(909) 676-3759 Phone/Fox
SIGN DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR:
Sign Methodsl Inc.
1749 28th Street
Signol Hill, CA 90806
(562) 989-5755 Phone (714) 427-6875 Fox
--,,--
.,
----r
EHO PLAZA
SIGN PROGRAM
C. APPROVED VENDORS
<1i.Mi'
Sign Methods, Inc.
1749 28th Street
Signol Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989.5755 Phone
(714) 427-6875 Fox
Contact: Jim Bras
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
Apdl 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
aMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Eloctrical SlliIlU Arl.d N..n
1749 E. 28th St.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989.5755
(8001 655-4336
Fox: (562) 427.6875
www.signmefhods.com
C' - t-
and Vendors
Page
A. PURPOSE AND INTENT
The purpose of this sign program is to ensure that the
signoge in ETCO Ploza reflects the integrity and overall
aesthetic values of the landlord and the City of Temecvla.
Conformity with this program will be strictly enforced, and
ony non-conforming signs will be removed by the Landlord at
the expense of the tenant.
B. GENERAL LANDLORD / TENANT REQUIREMENTS
Prior to manufacture of any sign in the Plaza, the Tenant sholl
submit to Landlord for written approval, two copies detailed
drawings. These drawings shall include the building elevation
to which the signs are to be ottached, sign dimensions,
graphics, location, colors, and met'hod of attachment. This
approval must be obtained prior to submittal to the City of
Temecula.
2.
All signs shall be reviewed for conformance with this criteria
and overall design quality. Approval or disapproval of sign
submittals based on aesthetics of design shall remain the sole
right of the Londlord.
3
Prior to the instal! and manufacture of any sign, the Tenant
sholl obtain 0 sign permit from the City of Temeculo.
4
The tenant shall pay for all signs, related materials, and
installation fees (including final inspection costs).
10
Tenant fascia signs will be limited to tenantls name. The use
of brand name logos will not be allowed on the sign.
6.
It is the responsibility of the tenantls sign company to verify all
conduit and transformer locations and seNice access prior to
fabrication.
7.
in the event 0 tenant vacates his premise, it is his
responsibility to patch all holes and point surface(s) to match
existing color of fascia. In additIon, the tenont sholl provide
a blo~k panel for any freestanding sign he occupies.
8
Landlord reserves the right to periodically hire on independent
electrical engineer, at Tenant's sole expense, to inspect the
installation ot all Tenant's signs. Tenants will oe required to
have any discrepancies and/or code violations corrected at
Tenant's expense. Any code violations, requests for sign
removals, or discrepancies not corrected within fifteen (15)
days of notice, may be corrected by the Landlord at Tenant's
expense.
",--...
9 All tenant signs shall be installed after city permits are
secured.
1 O. Cooperative tenant advertising, signing or seasonal event
signing will require a specialy event sign permit from the
City of Temecula.
C GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
Sign sizes sholl be limited to maximum widths shown on
tenant's elevation, and also shall not exceed the general
sizes outlined".
2. Signs shall be fabricated per the specifications shown.
3 All signs and their insfallation sholl comply with all local
building and electrical codes.
4. All electrical signs will be fabricated by a U.L. approved
sign company, according to U.L. specifications.
5. Sign company fa be fully licensed with the city and state
ond sholl hove full workman's compensation and general
liability insurance.
6. All penetrations of exterior fascio are to be sealed airtight
(color and finish to match existing building exterior).
7. All conduits, transformers, junction boxes and openings in
building surfaces shall be concealed. Exposed hardware
shall be finished in a manner consistent with quality
fabrication practices. no exposed raceways will be
ollowed.
8. Signs sholl be placed in locations as shown on elevotions
with londlord opprovol.
9. All signs shall have its sign permit number, name of
fabricator, date of installation and voltage in a visible
location.
10. Any tenant sign left thirty (30) days after vacating premises
sholl become the property of the landlord unless previous
arrangements have been agreed upon by landlord and
tenant.
'"'"""
ETt:O PLAU
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Rood
Temeculo, CA
Dale:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
Moy 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
Jonvory 23, 2003
Morch 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
(1iMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
li:ledrlt:Q1 Sign.. And N.on
1749 E 28th St.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989.5755
(800) 655.4336
Fa", (562) 427.6675
www.signmethods.com
Sign Criteria
Sections A, B, & C
Page 2
D. PROHIBITED SIGNS
1. ,Swn<; l.:nn"tihJtinC' n TrOHic: HC1",l"lrQ
No person shall install or maintain, or cause to be
installed or maintained, any sign which simulates or
imitates in size, colo.r, lettering or design any traffic sign
or signal, or which makes use of the words "STOP~,
"LOOK", "DANGER" or ony other words, phrases, symbols
or characters in such a manner as to interfere with,
mislead, or confuse traffic.
2. Sin no; in Pr.nxjmitv to LJtilitv Lin~_<;
Signs which have less horizontal or vertical clearance
ham outhor\'Ied communication or energized electrical
power lines than ore prescribed by the Laws of the State
of California ore prohibited.
3 'pajnt~d lett~rs will not hI": aermittec:l
4 lnhlnet/flo,Jrt~<;iAnt iIlIJminntp'r1 .,inns will nnt b~ nll"""wAd
5. 10etnl heed rnhinp.t .;inn~ (AXrp.nt n~ nnrl (If (J 1r1(1(l] nrp
nrnhihitp.d
6. fxtp.rnnllv i!hJminot~n!; nrF'> nn;hihitp~
7. Thp.rp.<:holl hI'! no m()ft()(') ~inn~.
8. There shall be no floshino. mnvinn. nr aUdible c;inn~
9. ill.9M m\l<;t hA nrrhih'lrturn\\y rnrnnntih\e w'lth the entire
center and receive approval of landlord and city loning,
planning and building deportments.
10 No sian sholl or()ip.d "~~wP th",,: ~DDroved si(ln ~"vl"llnQ..e....
11 Vp.hirlp. Sirt.!J..S.
Signs on or affixed to trucks, automobiles, trailers, or
other vehicles which advertise, identify, or provide
direction to a use Or actjvi~y not related to its lawful
activity are prohibIted.
12. Linht Rv1b Strinn.;
External displays, other than temporary decorative holiday
lighting which consists of unshieJded light bulbs are
prohibited, An exception hereto may be granted by the
landlord when the display is an integral port of the
design character 0\ the Qctivily tD which it relates.
,.........
13. Rillbnnrd Sians ore not nl'lJrmittp.rl.
14. ThA use of 0 OMmnn.f!nt c;alA sian is,orohihited.
The temporary use of these signs is limited to 0 thirty (30) day period and
is restricted to signs (affixed to the interior of windows) which do not
occupy more than twenty (20) percent of their respective window area,
Each business is permitted 0 total of not more than ninety (90) days' of
temporary signs per calendar year,
15. No Innn O:'1('1!J.Q!lP i_t;; l"lp.rmiHAQ.,
E. SIGN TYPES
1'. WALL SIGNS
SIGN TYPE WS.l IPrh..arv T"na,,' ~'.anl
Sign area not to exceed 87.5 square feet. Sign fabrication, design, and
placement is outlined in Exhibit '0'. (XIJnntity Anrl I nr(lt~nn...:
Maximum of one sign located on the East elevotion ol1d one on the
West elevation. Single-line or stocked copy is permit1ed. If tenant
displays two signs, second sign must be identical 10 1irst,
SIGN TYPE WS.2 ISe<ondarv Sinn}
Each secondary sign is not not t~ exceed 30.0 square feet in area. Sign
fabrication, design, and placement is outlined in Exhibit 'E'.
nun ntitv Anrl lamtinn ~
. Sign Type WS-2a (Second Floor Tenant Sign) One secondory
sign located on the second story under the orch of the East and West
elevations of Building 1 and Building 2, These signs are to identify a
single second-story tenant that occupies at least 50% of second floor.
Sign Type WS.2b (Ground Floor Tenant Sign) One secondory
· tenant sign on the ground floor of the East elevation and one secondary
tenant sign on the ground floor of the West elevation is allowed for each
tenant occupying two or more ground floor tenant spaces. See
elevations for acceptable locations to\' tnis type oi sign.
~R()IJN[) SIGNS
2.
SIGN TYPE MON (MULTI-TENANT MON\,!MENT SIGNl
Two (2) monument signs, as shown in Exhibit 'G, ta be located os shown
.~
EHO PlAU
SIGN PROGRAM
Locotion:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temeculo, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
CiiMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
Il.etrlcal Slg.... And N.on
1749 E. 281" 51.
Signal Hill, CA 907SS
1562) 989.5755
(800) 655.4336
Fox: (562) 427.6B75
www.signmethods.com
Sign Criteria
Sections D & E
Po 9 e 3
!~
~,
~2
B
-1 I
u
(:
I
____ _________:'::. .e:::=.___.
.::-":>1
'I
lJ
______~L~.__ _______
u
~
I N T E R S TAT E
15
_w
==.
-
----- - - U--------- U
I
u
IWS-2al
~S~
IWIS-11
IWS-2al
~
Fr~_~
38~-,-u
]JJ
rl-__;
:~ ~ r: reV1
~-- -
~. -
1-' -T
mE mE2J
BUILDING 2
i~
IWS-2al
[Ws:il
IWS-2al
[W"s=1l
Y1~= - L
~
~
['\ 'I
-rli
---"-- _?/
-/'.V
~
n__ IjL__
_______~"",o
~----------
Jl__
n
o
.==--~-
...r.OIOO'" '","0"
MADISON
A V E N U E
SIGN LEGEND
~ t:lEl , ""--V>_ U~ ~
.5.l1.E...f.I.6 Prlmory Tenant SIgn , "00'-"<0....... ;::
, ~g~~~ 0 "
SC4.LE.I"'='40' Oo~ w,.) .;~" located "n the Eo" .I""';on Orl>vnd Floor Tenant Signs. ~"..ibl. l.'''lian. m n-?~f ~~~fR ,. rotg'~
ond 0". on the W.,I .1.,0,1,,0 On" ..."ndar, l.nonl 'i~n en th. ~'<>vnd floo' > ~'~--;;:"" ~ 1 ~ z
n~ 3' ,
I'WJECT of Ih. EO'I .1.",,1100 o~d ono ..oendo')' '.non' ..go ~ ~~~,~~-~;;~?~ . a . ~, l
IWS_2al 3!:;::o-'O,=' ~ ..
(~ on Iheground {Ioo,oflh. Wtll,I.."lfon i,oll"",.d ~ . ~= , a.; ~ . "
S.und.I....rT.nonlSlgn l"'Meh '.nan' occvpying....d <>'mor'gr<>und - g-~<;",:,,9~ ,. ~ o . , 0
Iloorl.n<>nl.poco. ""8"" - """""""""""" ~ ~ - ~,
On. ..t<>~d<>"l "gn I<>td'.d dn ,I.. l.t<>~d "0') ~:''''''''''-o;' 8 88~8gg8gg 0 nO 0 , "
unoor,h. o"h <>j'h. h., ondW." .1,,"''',00,01 rnE.1 I MON I ,. wwwwS"""""""'''''''' 0 :> &.~
r,ORTH Bvildin9 I <>~d 6o,ld,.v ], Th... ,,~~. 0'. '0 ,d."',I) ;.., C>-..,.....o !~~ ~ "
oew",,~V'I , l>
<> ""91. ,.,ood..,o,\, lonon' ,ho' o~c~P'" 0' 1'0" Add,..., NumbuJ Mllnum.nl ~
50'0; 01 ,.c<>~d f1dll" :I VtC>-VH,n:- ;:
.~,
IWS.2al
T
----
,~-~ 1-
lllSiltllrtl
EIEl ~
BUILDING 2 . EAST ELEVATION (1.151
~5..:lI
IWS.2al
,,-~
!
JJ
BUILDING 2 . WEST ELEVATION (fv\A.DISON AVENUE)
~
Inf:
'--hi
WALL SIGN SCHEDULE: -
Tne quantity of wail signs (all types. lis-led below)
shall not exceed eleven (11) for each bvilding.
I WS..l I PrImary renant Sign
Of\flWS.\ l;,rn lotnletl onlr.e ~O~\ ltlevollon
and one on Ih. W.5t ..I"volion
IWS-2al
S.co...d Floor Tenant Sign
0.... ""l;.ond'J~li~nlo<:Qh.d onlh...."l;.o"d llo"l
~nderth" arth of Jh' Eo.t clld Welt .I"'ot,enl
of Buildiflg I ond S...ildinll 2. Th....iQn. o'eto
id""tif.!a.ir>lil..econd'JlorylenOl'ltthol
oel;.upi,u at 1.011 SO%of..condlloor.
~
Ground floor Tenant Sign
IPcuibl. Location]
O......ccndoryr.Mtll.ign on th"ll,,,"ndlloorof
th. Eo,t ,1"vclionondo"eucond"ryler.a"t,,'1"
onlh.grovndlloorolth"W.'lelevoti<:>ni.oilo",.d
10' lIoen le""n\ occvpy',ng \"'0 or mo,e ground
floor ttl"o"t IpOCel.
~ .-' ~~ --;
_~i,rl~1.iflr1Ir'~~ ~
~j .,.....1_ 7_
.I' .
I~L 1~1~ .'
,
NORTHEAST ELfY.
(1-5 VIEW')
BUILDING 2 . SOUTH ELEVATION (LOADING AREA)
BUILDING 2. NORTH ELEVATION {INT. COURTYARDI
--,
EHO pun
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
.
Mad\son Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecu\a, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
Ap,,1 25, 2002
May 13,2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
Januory 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
Jur.e 26, 2003
CiiMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
El.ctrlcal 51gna And N.on
1749 E 28th S..
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655.4336
Fax: (562) 427.6875
www.signmethods.com
SCALE,1/32'=1'-O'
~
-
Exhibit C
-"""
~
I WS..2a I
--------
~
BUILDING 1 . EAST ELEVATION (1.151
IWS-2al
BUILDING 1 . WEST ELEVATION (MADISON AVENUE)
.
.p- -..
/"
,
Jt
WALL SIGN SCHEDULE:
The quantity of wall signs (all types listed below)
shall not exceed eleven (11) for each building.
I WS.l I PrImary Tenan' Sign
Doe W~.\ "gn locoI.d on th. Eas! .1.vo!lo~.
ond one on Ih.Wut .I.yoloon
IWS-2al
Second Floor Tenon' Sign
Onel.condo...,.,i"" located On Ihe..cond story
vnd.rtheorcnoltk.foslolldWell .I.yoloon,
01 BvHdlng 1 ondS",ldin\l 2. Th.,e IIgn)orfl 10
id.,nli!yo,i"gl,'.cond..lorvtenonltho!
\leeu",i., 011,01150% of.ecolld/looc
~
Ground floor Tenant Sign
(Pouible Location)
One lteondoryle""""ignonlhegr"vnd floor of
th. fo,t.Ie"otion and "ne,.,o"darylOnonl sign
pnti'>."rovndflooroflheWestelevat;oni.ollowed
lorellchteM.nloccvpyinglwoa,mo,egrou"d
(loo'tenanl.pan.
~
-r:::J
I IrTII II i r,~
, "'lI~
I:imtt
J..
SOUTHEASTELEV.
ll.SYlf'H)
BU!LDING 1 . SOUTH ELEVATION (I NT. COURTYARD)
BUILDING 1 . NORTH ELEVATION (LOADING AREAl
,.....--"'"
Uf:O PLAZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
Ap!il 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
Moy 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
Jvne 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
Morch 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
CiiMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
EI.ctrh:al SlllIn. And N..;-
1749 E 28th 51.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655.4336
Fax' (562) 427.6875
www.sjgnmethods.com
SCALE,1/32":1'.0"
~
~
Exhibit B
~-----.
-r-
2'.6'
Mo;\.,
lelterHt.
I
I
PRI.RY
T' , NAN~ ~ F"".. 77B3M'roo,jedTM" (tonl
, .' . II Frazee 8734M "Bark Mulch" (clay)
, ' \ ~ E Frazee 87350 ''Wild Country" (raw umber)
. . ~ AS 1~!.5
PRIMARY TENANT WALL SIGN - MAX 875.0 5QUARE FEET j!:!J"-!~~z."'''''(}'1
FONT: FUTURA HEAVY BT '"
Max. 80% of Wall Width
f6INT r0' f)R srt-lFnI JlI=...;.
4'-0"
Max. Stocked
Copy
Height-
-L-
. -.!.!J Frazee S730W "loggio" (Off-white)
~ Frazee 8732W "frontier Ton" (light Ion)
51GN TYPE: t:ml
SPFr:lFlrATI()NS. Individual reverse-pan channellelters fabricated from .063 aluminum with .090 aluminum foces. Return depth to be three
(3) inches. Exterior to be painted using automotive enamel in color noted in schedule. Intemal 6500 white neon halo illumination. Letters to be
installed pin-movnled 1.1/2" off wall. No decoration of channel letter face is permitted. Logos are not permitted.
'* Height of sign not to exceed B5% of the hftight of the sign~ble portion of the wall on which it is placed
(or moximum heighl indicated in this program, whichever is less)
SIGN TYPE, I WS.ll
(fyp., Placement Varies)
'~~~.1~~ Ii~~;~:"~
XX
-=....~.:;I~
,~. ~~r T "
(-x..~
t~~.. ~
j'.'...'.":!~1ii1~.'.' IT
"."'>~\~
"I""....
.!!.I
ti
Rl JIIIJIN(; 1 WFST FI FVATIO~
(BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION IS MIRROR IMAGE)
,.---..\
Eno PLAZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temeculo, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
MOt 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
CiiMi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
El.ctrlca' Sllft& And N.oft
1749 E 28th St.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989.5755
(800) 655.4336
Fax: 1562) 427.6875
www.signmethods.com
SCALE 3/32"-1 '.0"
~
~
Exhibit D
"-'-,
, ,
Max. 80% of Well Width
4'-0'
Max. Stocked..
COpy
Height.
2':6'
Mex.
Letter HI,.
SIGN TYPE, Bl
FRAZEF PAINT rOl0~ 'rl-l~nlll F.
.!!.I 8730W "Loggia" (off.white)
~ 8732W'FronfierTar\" (llgktIOrt)
~ 7783M ''Toasted Ten" (101"1)
I'D 8734M "Bark Mul~' (clay)
. 8735D "Wild Country" (rew umber)
SPEc::lFICATI.ONS: Individual reverse-pan channelleHers..fabricated from .063 aluminum with ,090 aluminum iaces. Return depth to be
three (3) inches. Exterior to be pointed using automotive ~name) in color nofed in schedule. Internal 6500 white neon halo illumination.
Letters to be installed pin.rQf!.!,UltE!&l"'l~2\Q.ftwaIL No decoration of channel letter face is permitted, logos ore not permitted,
. Height of sign nof to exceed 85% of the height of fhe signable portion of the wall on which it is placed (or maximum helgor indicated in this. program, whichever is less).
.. Sign WS-2o only may be stocked,
SIGN TYPE, I WS.2a
SIGN TYPE, ~
(Typ., Placement Varies)
1lIlINMIr
+
Iii"'"
i ,', ~ : ':. ; i
I . ...., I
,'.'..',' .
XX
_ft
RIIII nlNG 1 WfST fl FVATION
'(BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION IS MIRROR IMAGE)
~
EHO PUlA
SIGN
PROGRAM
location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
Apdl 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
6;MF
SIGN METHODS INC.
Ilectrlcol Sl8na And Neon
1749 E. 28\h St.
Signal Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989.5755
(800) 655.4336
Fa" (562) 427-6875
www.signmefhods.com
SCALE,1/32'-I'.0'
~
-
Exhibit E
4'-0" Apprx.
I
b
'-
SIGN TYPE, m!I
BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS
SCALE 112"=1'.0"
1" thick PVC, painfed as. noted.
Numbers. to be installed
flush to building fascia using YHB
tope and construction adbesive.
Two (2) sets of address numbers per
buildIng, as indicated on elevotions.
PAIN' rOlOR SrHEDlJl E,
.!!J Frazee 8730W "logg'o" (off-white)
82! Frozee 8732W "Fronf,er Ton" (light ton)
All Frazee 7783M "Toasted Ton" (ton)
m Frazee 8734M "Bark Mulch" rcloy)
aJ Frazee 87350 "Wild Country' (raw umber)
::!J
-< ..
J
'r
J
~; 0
~ ~"
"
I
~
~..
Ith
',.
L
~ ~.
W
.~
-SIGN TYPE, rmIl]
:rVP1(:Al AO[)RFSS PI ArFMENi
SCALE, 1/16"= I '.0"
.=TEQ
-=W
......---,
ET(O PUZA
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Son born Road
Temecula, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
E.I
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
JUM 27, 2002
January 23. 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24. 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
."-'.1
~Mi'
SIGN METHODS INC.
il.drica' 51"... And N.on-
1749 E. 28th SI.
Signol Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655.4336
Fax: (562) 427.6875
www.s19nmethods.com
Address Numbers
Exhibii F
...,~,
8'.0"
8'.0"
SIGN ELEVATION
SIGN TYPE, Iimm
DOUBLE.FACED MONUMENT
SPECIFICATIONS'
liD
..!U
.Im
.....~
:."m
Min. 200 sq. ft.
landscaping area
around base of s.ign.
Landscaping plan must
provide for year-round
color.
MnnlJmF'nt ~inn, cornice and base 10 be fabricafed from aluminum with
fexcote paint finish as noted in schedule.
Tenant LOOV to be rouled and hocked with white acrylic. Tenant sign
cabinet to internally illuminate using flourescent lamps.
Arlrlrp.<:;s n.lImp.rnl~ to be flat-cut-out aluminum, pointed as noted, affixed
to base of sign.
'"",
SIGN PROFILE
(Street Side)
..--,
. ,
ETtO PlAZA
SIGN
PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
Temecula, CA
I~
],"~.j.'
'''..t
.]'~'..~
I
~~
1
~
I
Date:
April 11, 2002
q
i'o
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
Moy 13, 2002
Moy 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
Januory 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
April 24, 2003
June 10, 2003
June 26, 2003
CiiMP
~PAJ"'T rOJ OR SrHFrl[ II F:
SIGN METHODS INC.
Ilectriclld Sign. And Neon
Jl..1.J
82.1
......"'.. 'I
' ''''I'~
m
m
8730W "Logglo" (off-white)
8732W "Frontier Ton" (light ton)
77B3M "Toosted Ton' (ton)
8734M "Bork Mulch" (cloy)
87350 'Wild Country" (row umber)
1749 E. 28th 51.
Slgnol HIli, CA 90755
(562) 989.5755
(800) 655-4336
Fox; (562) 427-6875
www.signmethods com
SCALE. 1/4""'1'.0"
~
~
Exhibit G
...-.,
,.....,.,
,
ROUGH NOTES COMPilED BY JAMIE FOR INTERNAL USE
(FROM TEMECULA SIGN ORPINANCE)
FRffSTANnU-JG SIGNS NnJF:i.;.
5' SETBACK OR 17' FROM FACE OF CURB [WHICHEVER IS LESS)
OUTSIDE SITE VISITILlTY AREA
PERP TO STREET, EXCEPT AT END OF CUl.DE.SAC
150 FT 6ETWEEN SIGNS I
MEASURE HT FROM NEAREST HARDSCAPE . BERMING UP TO 2 FT IN ADDN TO MAX HT ALLOWED
FLOOD LIGHTING ENCOURAGED
SAME BACKGROUND COLOR All TENANTS
CENTER 10 SIGNS SHAll BE ONE.SIDED, OTHERS TWO.SIDED
LANDSCAPING ~ 300 S.F. AROUND BASE (IF FWY-ORIENTED), IF NOT, 100 IF CENTER 10, 200 IF MULTI.TENANT.
INCLUDE FLOWERING PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, OR OTHER COLOR PLANTS. YR.ROUND COLOR REQ.'D.
ADDRESS REQUIRED - NOT COUNTED IN AREA
ILLUMINATION: ONLY COPY TO ILLUMINATE. NO OVERALL FACE ILLUM.
NO EXTERNAL IlLUM FOR MULTI-TENANT SIGNS
NOTE SIGN WIDTH (DEPTH?) TABLE
WAil SIG.NS N~
MAJOR TENANTS ONLY ON MULTI.TENANT BUILDINGS
MI<<. OF 4 PER BUSINESS {INCL GROUND SIGNS)
DESCENDING AREAS PER SIGN-SEE 17.20-15
MIN. 6" LETTER HEIGHT, 6" FOR STACKED COPY
INT. ILLUM. CHANNEL LETTERS, HAlO, EXPOSED NEON ALLOWED
EXTERNAL ILLUM. IS PERMITTED IF PART OF A SIGN PROGRAM.
1-888- TEMECULA
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM APRIL 9, 2003
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Aevision\PJanning\Planning Commission 4.19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
9
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 9, 2003
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:06
P.M., on Wednesday, April 9, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Chairman Chiniaeff.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Mathewson, Telesio, and Chairman
Chiniaeff.
Absent:
Guerriero and Olhasso.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Aaenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of April 9, 2003.
(Item NO.5 was continued to May 7,2003, and Item Nos. 6, 7, and B were continued to
April 23, 2003.)
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of March 19, 2003.
3 Director's Hearina Case Uodate
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for March 2003.
R: PlannlngCommls.lonlmlnutes\040903
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-
3 (amending lIem No. 1 - see page 1). The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of Commissioners
Guerriero and Olhasso who were absent.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
There was no Commission Business.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
4 Plannina Aoplication No_ PA02-Q426 To establish a sian propram for Etco Plaza. a
shoooina center consistina of two buildinas located at 27270 Madison Avenue
(Continued from March 19, 2003)
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO_ 2003-016
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA02-0426, TO ESTABLISH A
SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE ETCO PLAZA
DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON
AVENUE ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NUMBERS 910-272-005 & 006
Highlighting the Planning Commission's previous modifications (March 19,2003) to the
requested sign program, Associate Planner Harris reviewed the staff report (as per
agenda material). It was noted that since that time, the applicant has revised the sign
program, however, not all the recommendations or determinations of the Commission
have been made. The following is a summary of the sign program modifications
requested by the Commission versus what the applicant has provided (noting the
applicant was not in attendance).
. That, as per the Commission, there be one sign on the east and
west sides of each building:
o The applicant's request-modified the sign program
accordingly, however, requesting three location options
for the primary tenant sign;
o Staff would recommend that the signs be located
underneath the prominent arched roof elements of the
buildings which represents the most appropriate location
based on the buildings architectutural features.
Therefore, staff would recommend that the two permitted
R: PI...nlngComml..lonlmlnu....1040903
2
.
primary tenant signs be limited to these locations on each
building and that the sign program be modified
accordingly.
SECOND FLOOR SIGNS
. The Commission determined that one secondary tenant sized
sign may be allowed on the north and south side of each building
provided there was one second-story tenant; if there were more
than one second-story tenant, no second-story signs would be
permitted.
o The applicant's request-one secondary tenant sign on
the east and west elevations, not the north and south
elevations. If the tenant were to occupy at least 50% of
the second floor.
o Staff stated that the applicant's request would result in an
excessive amount of signage on the east and west
elevations and would detract from the architectural
features. Therefore, staff would recommend that the
second-story signage provisions, outlined by the Planning
Commission, be maintained and that the sign program be
revised accordingly.
GROUND FLOOR SIGNS
. The Commission determined that there be one ground floor sign
for each secondary tenant on the east and west elevation for
each building per tenant (maximum 4);
. That if a tenant were to occupy two spaces or more, only one
ground floor sign may be granted;
. That the applicant concurred with the proposed recommendation
as it relates to ground floor sign for each secondary tenant on the
east and west elevation; but with regard to the multiple space
issue, the applicant would be requesting, in lieu of a ground floor
sign, another sign on the second-Story.
LOGO SIGNS
. The Planning Commission determined that no logo sign should
be allowed on the building;
o The applicant's request to permit logos;
o Staff would recommend that the sign program be modified
to reflect the Commission's decision.
R: PlannlngCommlsslonlmlnutea\D40903
3
I.
MONUMENT SIGNS
. The Commission determined that two proposed freestanding
monument signs along the Madison Avenue frontage were
appropriate as proposed;
o The applicant's request-to relocate the originally
proposed Freestanding Multi-Tenant Identification Signs
adjacent to the two site driveways;
o Staff has no objection to the revised sign locations
provided the signs comply with the sight visibility
requirements;
o Staff has determined that the proposed sign program for
Etco Plaza Development, as conditioned, does comply
with all applicable sign standards identified in the
Development Code. Subsequently, staff would
recommend that the sign program be approved as
conditioned.
Mr. James P. Brass, 1749 E. 28111 Street Signal Hill, representing the applicant, Sign
Methods, Inc., reiterated the multi-space issue, requesting one secondary tenant sign
be located on the second-story of both the east and west elevations of each building to
identify a second-story tenant that occupies at least 50% of the second floor space.
Commissioner Mathewson noted that significant changes are being proposed by the
applicant, stating that the proposed changes would result in more signage on the west
and east sides of the building, that he would support staff's recommendation, and
reiterating his desire to follow the proposed font style.
Addressing the multiple-space issue on the second floor, it was noted by Commissioner
Telesio that the intent of the signs on the north and south ends of the building was for a
tenant occupying the entire second floor (100%) that there would be no aesthetic
impact or a change in total number of signs per building if such signs were granted to
tenant occupying 51% or more.
Recapitulating the Planning Commission's decision, Commissioner Mathewson clarified
the tolal number of allowable signs per building: one primary sign on the west and east
sides (two); ground floor signs (8); and a secondary sign on the north or south side
(one); plus the monument sign.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Associate Planner Harris clarified No. 13 of the design
guidelines (Banners, Pennants and Balloons used for advertising purposes) with the
Planning Commission concurring to not permit such usage.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve staff's recommendation as
amended as follows:
. Secondary signage on the second floor to grant a tenant occupying 51% or
more of the second floor a secondary sign on the north and south ends;
R: PlannlngCommlsslon\mlnutes\040903
4
. Maximum number of signs on each building 11 which would include one
secondary floor sign on the north and south ends of the building;
. That No. 13 of the design guidelines (Banners, Pennants and Balloons) be
stricken.
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
approval with the excectlon of Commissioners Guerriero and Olhasso who were
absent.
5 Plannino.Application No. PA02-0340 To establish a Comprehensive Land Use Plan
in association with a future retail cq,mmercial shoppina center located on the
southeast and southwest comers of Pechanoa parkwav and State Hiohwav 79
South
(Continued from March 19,2003)
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Requesting a continuance to April 23, 2003
(Continued to May 7, 2003; see page 1.)
6 Planninq Application No. PA02-0334 To desion, construct. and ocerate a 27,706
square foot two-storY office buildino located on Jefferson Avenue and north of Via
Montezuma
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. P A02-0334 pursuant
to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA02-o334, A DEVELOPMENT
PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABUSH AND OPERATE A
27,706 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.67
VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON
JEFFERSON AVENUE AND NORTH OF VIA
MONTEZUMA KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.
921-400-037
(Continued to April 23, 2003; see page 1.)
R: PlannlngCommlaalonlmlnu\es\D40903
5
7 Planninp- ADp]cation No. PA02-0652 A VestinR Tentative Parcel MaD located on the
south side of Rancho California Road. west of Cosmic Road and east of the Rancho
California Road I Moraca Intersection
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No.
PA02-Q652 (Vesting Tentative Parcel Map) pursuant to Section 15162 of the
California Environmental Quality Act;
7.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA02-0652, AN EIGHT LOT VESTING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC
ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-
012,013,014.
(Continued to April 23, 2003; see page 1.)
8 Planninp AoDlication No. PA02-0620 To construct establish and oDe rate an 8.100
s~uare foot multi-tenant retail buildino on 1.01 acres located within the Bel Villaaio
shoopino. center., west of Maraarita Road. 470 linear feet south of the Mall Access
Road and North General Kearnev Road intersection
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No.
PA02-0620 (Development Plan) pursuant 10 Section 15162 of the California
Environmental Quality Act
8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R: PlaMlngComml..lonlmlnut..\D40903 G
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA02.Q620, A DEVELOPMENT
PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE
AN 8,100 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-TENANT RETAIL
BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED
WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, 470 LINEAR FEET
SOUTH OF THE MALL ACCESS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD INTERSECTION AND
ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-
090-063,071,072 AND 078.
(Continued to April 23, 2003; see page 1.)
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
A. Having attended the American Planning Association <APA) Conference in
Denver, Colorado, Chairman Chiniaeff advised that it was applicant productive and that
next years will be in Washington, D.C.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
Planning Director Ubnoske advised that the second interviews for the Associate
Planner position have been scheduled and noted that Assistant Planner Preisendanz
has tendered his resignation and that staff has interviewed consultants to prepare
design guidelines.
Commissioner Telesio readdressed Ex-Parte Communication with Assistant City
Attorney Curley providing an updated version of the Planning Commission's Handbook.
Planning Director Ubnoske noted that the Ex-Parte communication topic would
Be placed on a future Planning Commission Agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next reaular meetinq to be
held on Wednesday. Aoril 23. 2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, and Temecula.
~~IL
Chairman
, '-
~Jhr- ((~v4-
Debbie Ubnoske,
Director of Planning
R: PlannlngCOmml..lon....lnules\D40903 7
ATTACHMENT NO.4
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM AUGUST 6, 2003
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 EtCD Plaza. Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-Q6\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
10
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 6, 2003
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on
Wednesday August 6, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Olhasso led the audience in lhe Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Guerriero, Olhasso, and Vice Chair Telesio
Absent:
Commissioner Mathewson and Chairman Chiniaeff
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 AQenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of August 6, 2003
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve Consent Item No.1. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of
Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of June 4, 2003.
2.2 Approve the Minutes of June 18, 2003.
2.3 Approve the Minutes of July 2, 2003.
2.4 Approve the Minutes of July 16, 2003
1
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve Consent Item NO.2. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval with the exceotion of
Commissioner Guerriero who abstained from Item No. 2.3 and Commissioners Chiniaeff and
Mathewson who were .absent.
3 Director's Hearino Case Uodate
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for July 2003.
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve Consent Item No.3. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with the exceotion of
Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
None.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Continued from July 2, 2003
4 Plannino Aoqlication No. PA02-0702 A Develooment Plan for Plannina Aoolication PA02-
0702 for six (6l. sinole storv industrial buildinos totalina aooroximatelv ~2.220 souare feet
located on the north side of Zevo Drive. aporoximatelv 500 feet east of Winchester Road
(APN 909-370-0071. Dan Lono. Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0702 (Development
Plan) pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-046
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA02-0702, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT SIX
FREE-STANDING, SINGLE STORY INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS
TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 82,220 SQUARE FEET. THE
SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
ZEVO DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET EAST OF
WINCHESTER ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS
PARCEL NO. 909-370-007
Associate Planner Long provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material),
noting the following:
2
. That the applicant has been working with staff to enhance the architecture and to
provide more detail on the landscaping plan, as requested at the July 2, 2003 Planning
Commission meeting
Architecture
. That building nos. 1 and 6, located on Zevo Drive, include decorative stone, cornice, and
pre-cast concrete columns at the arcade of the main entrance
. That the arcade will project two feet from the main building and will include a cornice on
top of the arcade, establishing a strong main entrance Identity
. That functional windows (4' x 6') are proposed on the upper portion of the elevations and
that windows will provide natural lighting;
. That the southwest corner of building no. 1 and the southeast comer of building no. 6 will
inClude corner treatments of stone and glass windows
Landscaoina
. That the landscape plan has been revised to indicate the precise types of species, as
requested by staff
Conditions of Aooroval
Associate Planner Long requested that the following conditions of approval be revised:
. ProLect Descrlotion - the following text should be amended:
o The site is generally located on the north side of Zevo Drive approximately 150 feet
east of Winchester Road
. Condition No. 17 - That under Plannina Division/General Reouirements - delete the
following (repeated under Condition No. 25):
o The electrical transformer, gas meter and all other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be located in a discreet location and screened with landscaping as
approved by the Planning Director.
By way of photos, Mr. Long continued with the staff report and advised that staff has determined
that the revised plans will be consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and Development
Code; that staff would recommend approval of the application with the modified conditions (as
noted above); and that the project would be categorically exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Ralph Hastings, 5031 Birch Street, Newport Beach, architect for the project, stated that he
was available for questions.
Mr. David Silver, 20 Rivo Alto Canal, Long Beach, Manager of Hastings Partners, Inc., stated
that he was also available for questions.
3
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
MOnON: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the item with staff's recommendation with
the noted amendment and deletion as noted on page 3. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of
Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent.
New Items
5 Planninq Aoolication No. PA03-0249 To add two out-oarcels into the Harveston Soecific
Plan and amend the Official Zonino Map' located north of the intersection of Ynez Road and
Eouitv Drive within the Harveston Soecific Plan. David Hooan. Princioal Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-047
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE
CITY OF TEMECULA TO ADD TWO OUT-PARCELS INTO THE
HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND INCORPORATE TWO
OUT-PARCELS INTO THE APPROPRIATE TEXT AND
EXHIBITS OF SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION
PA03-0249)
Principal Planner Hogan provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material),
noting the following:
· That Lennar Communities has acquired the two out-parcels and would like to incorporate
them into the Harveston Specific Plan; that, thereby, amending the Harveston Specific
Plan, adding the out-parcels into adjacent planning areas; that the Zoning Map be
amended; and that a determination of consistency be made between the amended
project and the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR);
. That staff has reviewed and conducted an analysis (included in the staff report) that the
environmental impact to the project will meet the guidelines of the original certified
Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Matthew Fagan, 42011 Avenida Vista Cadera, advised that he was available for questions.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
4
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtlon of
Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent.
6 Plan nino Aoolication No. PA03-0254 A re!l]Jest for a one-vear Extension of Time for
Tentative Parcel Mao 29643 to subdivide 4.72 acres of vacant industrial land into three
oarcels located on the west side of Business Park Drive aporoximatelv 600 feet south of the
Business Park Drive/Rancho Wav intersection. Thomas Thornslev. Associate Planne~
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA03-0245 (Development
Plan) pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-048
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-o254, A REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION
OF TIME (THE FIRST ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME) FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 29643, TO SUBDIVIDE 4.72
ACRES OF VACANT LAND INTO THREE (3) PARCELS WITHIN
THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) ZONE, GENERALLY LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF THE BUSINESS
PARK DRIVElRANCHO WAY INTERSECTION AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-020-068
Associate Planner Thornsley provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material),
noting the following:
. That Tentative Parcel Map No. 29643 was first approved on May 3, 2000, in conjunction
with a Development Plan (PA99-0478) to build three industrial buildings for which the
applicant is requesting a one-year extension of time.
In response to Commissioner Telesio's query regarding updating the indemnification condition,
Director of Planning Ubnoske explained that this amendment had been requested by the City
Attorney in order to update language.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Dennis Armstrong, 1530 Consumer Circle, Corona, applicant's representative, stated that he
was available for any Questions.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
5
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve staff's recommendation with the proposed
modifications to the conditions of approval as requested by staff. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtlon of
Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent.
7 Plannina Aoolication No. PA03-0323 To revise an aqoroved sipn proGram for Etco Plaza. a
shoqoinp center consistina of two buildinos located at 27270 Madison Avenue. Matthew
Harris. Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO 2003-049
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA03-o323, TO REVISE AN APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM FOR
THE ETCO PLAZA DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY LOCATED
AT THE TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON
AVENUE ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS
910-272-005 AND 006.
By way of photos, Associate Planner Harris provided an overview of the staff report (as per
agenda material), noting the following:
. That on April 9, 2003, the Planning Commission, although limiting the amount of second-
story signage, approved the request for a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Etco
Plaza development; that the property owner/developer attempted to appeal the Planning
Commission's decision, but that the appeal period had expired; that the applicant is now
proposing to revise the Sign Program, whereby the second-story signs (one sign on the
north elevation and one sign on the south elevation) would be replaced with two second-
story signs on each building (both east and west sides).
. That staff has determined that the proposed Sign Program revisions for the Etco Plaza
development do not comply with the purpose and intent of the sign standards of the
Development Code and, therefore, would recommend denial of the application.
Requesting clarification of a primary tenant as opposed to a secondary tenant, Associate
Planner Harris, for Commissioner Telesio, advised that those terms are not defined in the sign
program nor in the minutes and that, therefore, would assume that such a determination would
be made by the owner/leaser.
Commissioner Telesio relayed his concern with the allocation of signage, noting that four
tenants may occupy the first floor and that the primary tenant would occupy a majority of the
space and be permitted a primary sign.
At this time, the public was opened.
6
Mr. Afshin Etebar, Manager, Etco Investments LLC, clarified that the north and south sides of
the building are blocked by other buildings (Vista Paint and Billiard Depot); that the third floor
will be occupied by a primary tenant; the second floor may be occupied by as many as six
tenants but that a lease has been signed with one company for the entire second floor; and that
because of restrictive sign age, leasing of building space has become a problem.
In response to Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Etebar stated that the signs would be lit at night.
Mr. Jim Nadal, 41623 Margarita Road, Westmar Commercial Brokerage, provided a history of
the building; advised of the changes made to the building at the request of the Planning
Commission; and reiterated that signage is important in order to lease building space.
At this time, pubiic hearing was closed.
Commissioner Olhasso commented on the aesthetic appearance of the Vista Paint building;
expressed concern with the number of signs proposed for the first floor; and requested that the
sign allowance be changed from four signs to three signs.
Commissioner Guerriero spoke in favor of the applicant's request.
Commissioner Telesio spoke in favor of the applicant's request.
Planning Director Ubnoske requested clarification to the applicant's recommendation in that the
north and south signs would be omitted.
Commissioner Telesio stated that the second floor tenant would be granted the primary sign;
that the secondary tenant, pending that the tenant occupy at least 50% or more of the second
floor, would be granted signs on the north and south ends; and that a maximum of four signs be
granted on the first floor.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to deny the staff's recommendation and approve the
applicant's request, defetlnq the two north and south elevation signs of both buildings and
aoorovinq two signs, on the second floor, on the east and west sides of both buildings. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval with the
exceotlon of Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
None.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Planning Director Ubnoske reminded Commissioners Guerriero and Telesio that the meeting
with the architect to discuss the Design Guidelines has been scheduled for August 13, 2003
from 1 :00 P.M. - 2:30 P.M.
7
fv
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:42 P.M., Vice Chair Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next regular meeting to
be held on Wednesday, August 20, 2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula.
\K 64 .~l-
Denni~. Chiniaeff -
Chairman
7}~. v-~}t..
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
8
ATTACHMENT NO.5
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
(DENIAL)
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
11
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
05-0390 TO MODIFY AN APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM FOR
ETCO PLAZA GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF
SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON AVENUE
Section 1. Greg Iscas with Sign Methods Inc, filed Planning Application No. PAOS-
0390, a Sign Program Modification application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula
General Plan and Development Code on April 19, 2006.
Section 2. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application on April 19, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support
or in opposition to this matter.
Section 4. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of the Application subject to and based
upon the findings set forth hereunder.
Section 5.
All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 6.
by reference.
The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 7. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in denying the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.28.080.6 of the Temecula Municipal
Code.
A. The proposed sign program revisions do not satisfy the intent or objectives of the
Development Code nor enhance the development. According to Section 17.28.010 of the
Development Code, when the quality and amount of signage detracts from the aesthetics of the
buildings, the signage can create a visual blight which detracts from the quality of the
environment and an individual's perception of the City. The proposed revisions result in
excessive signage detracting from the building architecture and aesthetics. The proposed
revisions result in excessive signage thereby detracting from the building architecture and
aesthetics.
B. The proposed sign program will not preserve and improve the appearance of the
City as viewed from the Interstate 15 freeway, and the allowable signage exceeds that which is
considered necessary for effective business signage. According to Section 17.28.010 of the
Development Code, the City must assure that the signs are appropriate to the type of activity
and location to which they pertain.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Bteo Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-06\PC RESOLUTION.doc
1
Section 8. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 19'h day of April 2006.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of April 2006, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4 19-06\PC RESOLUTION.doc
2
ATTACHMENT NO.6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
(APPROVAL)
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0390 EteG Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
12
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0390 TO MODIFY AN APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM
FOR ETCO PLAZA GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON AVENUE
Section 1. Greg Iscas with Sign Methods Inc, filed Planning Application No. PA05-
0390, a Sign Program Modification application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula
General Plan and Development Code.
Section 2. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application on April 19,2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support
or in opposition to this matter.
Section 4. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of the Application subject to and based
upon the findings set forth hereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 5.
by reference.
The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 6. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section t7.28.080.B of the Temecula Municipal
Code.
A. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and
visually related to:
1. All of the signs included in the sign program. This shall be accomplished by
incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style,
colors, illumination sign type, or sign shape.
2. The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors,
or design motifs included in the building being identified.
3. Surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or
obscuring adjacent approved sign.
The proposed sign program modifications will enhance the development, is in harmony
with and visually relates to all the signs included in the sign program bi incorporating
common design elements such as materials and illumination into the program. The
proposed sign program modifications will not adversely affect the surrounding
development and land uses or obscure adjacent approved signs.
C"\PJanoing\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Corrun.ission 4-19-Q6\PC RESOLUTION - approvaLdoc
I
B. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to
changes in building tenants.
C. The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of this Chapter, in that the sign
program complies with all the regulations of this Chapter, except that flexibility is allowed with
regard to sign area, number, location, and height. Further, to the extent the sign program does
not comply with the requirements of this Chapter as to sign area, number, location, and height,
the proposed sign program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the
objectives of this Chapter.
The proposed sign program modifications accommodates future revisions which may be
required due to changes in building tenants by specifying that tenants vacating premises
shall be responsible for the removal of their sign within 30 days of vacating the premises.
This includes the removal of the signs, capping electrical wiring, filling all holes and
painting wall surface. No new tenant signage will be approved until the prior signage
has been removed and the area restored.
Section 7. Environmental ComDJiance. This project is exempt from review under
CEOA, pursuant to Section 15311 (Class 11 Categorical Exemption - Accessory Structures) of
the CEOA Guidelines.
Section 8. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 19th day of April 2006.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Eteo Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-06\PC RESOLUTION - approval,doc
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of April 2006, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning CommissioD 4-19-06\PC RESOLUTION - approvaL doc
)
ITEM #4
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Planning Commission
Katie Le Comte, Planning Technician
May 17, 2006
SUBJECT:
Planning Application No. PA06-0034 a Finding of Public Convenience or
Necessity for Orchard's Market, to authorize wine tasting through the issuance
of a Type-42 license (on-sale beer and wine-public premises), inside their
existing store located at 27473 Ynez Road (APN: 921-270-055)
General Plan: Site: CC (Community Commercial)
North: CC (Community Commercial)
South: PO (Professional Office)
East: CC (Community Commercial)
West: Interstate 15 & HT (Highway Tourist Commercial)
Zoning: Si1e: CC (Community Commercial)
North; CC (Community Commercial)
South: PO (Professional Office)
East: CC (Community Commercial)
West: Interstate 15 & HT (Highway Tourist Commercial)
Land Use: Site: Orchard's Market
North: Michael's Craft Store
South; The UPS Store
East: Parking Area and Ynez Road
West: Interstate 15
BACKGROUND
On February 1, 2006, Dallo & Company submitted an application requesting that the City of
Temecula Planning Commission make a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity to
authorize wine tasting in their existing store located at 27473 Ynez Road.
Orchard's Market currently holds a Type-20 license (off-sale beer and wine) which authorizes
the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the premises where sold. In order to authorize
wine tasting in the store the issuance of a Type-42 license (on-sale beer and wine-public
premises) from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) is required, in conjunction
with the Type-20 license currently held by the establishment. A Type-42 license allows for the
on-site consumption of beer and wine, as well as the retail sale of beer and wine for off-site
consumption. No distilled spirits may be on the premises.
G:\Planning\2006\PAOS.0034 Orchard's Marketplace - Public Conv\Planning\Staff Report MEMO.doc
1
Census Tract 432.16, in which Orchard's Market is located, is "over-concentrated". This means
that the number of existing licenses within a given census tract exceed the allowable threshold
determined by ABC. When "over-concentration" occurs, State law requires a local hearing body
to make the finding of Public Convenience and Necessity before an alcoholic beverage license
will be issued by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board.
Staff has discussed the proposed project with ABC and has determined that a total of six on-
sale licenses are permitted in Census Tract 432.16 before it is considered over-concentrated.
Currently 43 on-sale licenses exist within the Census Tract, most of which are held by
restaurants. However, of the 43 existing on-sale licenses, one Type-42 license currently exists
to allow for the authorization of wine tasting in Census Tract 432.16. This Type-42 license is
held by the Temecula Valley Wine Company, which specializes in locally grown wines and wine
tasting. Orchard's Market would offer unique wines from all over the world, as well as locally
produced wines.
ANALYSIS
Wine tasting is a permitted use in the Community Commercial zoning district, thus a Conditional
Use Permit is not required.
Additionally, the location of the wine tasting area has been moved, per the request of staff, from
the cafe seating area near the front entrance of the store, to a more appropriate location at the
side of the store near the bakery area (see Partial Floor Plan, blue page 3). Additionally, the
wine tasting area will be secured by a three-foot high wrought iron railing. Per ABC
requirements minors are not allowed to enter this area. An Orchard's Market employee will also
ensure that all proper ABC regulations and appropriate age identification requirements are met
for all persons entering this area. Alcoholic beverages account for approximately ten percent of
the products being sold at this establishment (see Statement of Operations, blue page 7).
FINDINGS
1. Is the proposed use consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code?
Yes. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the
site (Community Commercial), the Zoning designation (also, Community Commercial),
as well as with the standards within the Development Code.
2. Is the proposed use consistent with the nature, condition and character of adjacent land
uses?
Yes. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, conditions and development of
adjacent land uses, buildings and structures. The proposed project will provide the
community with an additional convenience of having the option to taste wine before it is
purchased from Orchard's Market. The proposed project will also promote commerce
within the City by allowing Orchard's Market to be competitive in relation to other similar
businesses within the community, while providing patrons with the opportunity to taste a
broad variety of wines, including locally produced wines, as well as wines from all over
the world, before they chose to make a purchase.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-Q034 Orchard's Marketplace - Public Conv\Planning\Staff Report MEMO.doc
2
3. Will the proposed use have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses?
No. The proposed use is not expected to have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses,
as all of the immediately surrounding uses in Tower Plaza Shopping Center are
commercial uses.
4. Would the proposed use result in an excessive number of similar establishments in
close proximity?
No. There is currently one wine tasting facility at the Temecula Valley Wine Company,
which is in close proximity of Orchard's Market. In regard to over-concentration, there
are a total of 43 on-sale licenses within Census Tract 432.16, most of which are held by
restaurants. Six on-sale licenses are allowed before the Census-Tract is considered
over concentrated by ABC's standards. Of the 43 existing licenses, only one Type-42
license is currently active. It has been issued to The Temecula Valley Wine Company to
authorize wine tasting on their premises. Generally, Type-42 licenses are issued to
establishments where wine tasting will occur.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff Recommends that the Planning Commission consider the information presented above
and approve the findings for Public Convenience or Necessity.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 4
2. Site Plan - Blue Page 5
3. Partial Floor Plan - Blue Page 6
4. Statement of Operations - Blue Page 7
5. Statement of Justification - Blue Page 8
6. Census Tract Map - Blue Page 9
7. ABC Licenses and Types Summary - Blue Page 10
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0034 Orchard's Marketplace - Public Conv\Planning\Staff Report MEMO.doc
3
ATTACHMENT NO.1
VICINITY MAP
G;IPlanning\2006IPA06-0034 Orchard's Marketplae<e - Public ConvlPlanninglStaff Report MEMO.doc
4
, '\
\, \
\\
j
\
/" \
//
//
\
\
\
\
\
\
/
///
//
//
//r;
_\~"-,
! '-.
.~
/
/
/
~
./' /"
~/./" - /~~
,/ ~
// /// /
// / /
,//' ////
\.// /// /
// ....---\--
\/\\// -',......... .
//.,
.// \ ',.,~
...J
...
,
......
...
'-'':,y'//
"'
\//
I~
~"
"",,/^"".,
,//
"
"
,
,~.
"
.,
//
'.
/1
////',,- ,"-
//, ... /...
// "'" / '-,
//' //~ "
"-
).,
// ~"
...-
//
/
~
'"
/
~
>,-
...-/
'"
~
//// ~
/ $
z
~
. r-
~~
//"
.","-
~ LR10RD
/>--)
-I'"
/
/\
/ ' /
/ . '
/ # /
/ ,,$ /
/ r? /
.p /
V /
" / ,ffi' /
.~...J i" ,/
! I
..,
"\'-,
'&
\.,
'\
\'
...
,
'....
'.
"
/1
./
\
1\
~ //'
///-
~/..-
,/
/;:/~
.-::/ \
\ //,
\ \/
/
/
z
)
./
'.'.
,
'.
j' .
./
",
",/
/' //
"
/
'.1"
/
/
\
.......
'-.,
'.
.......
",
,
"
,
')
".
,
/ I~
-,,~~ /
" / I
'I' i/
,'" '
I Q ,/
/1,:\/
/ ?:: /
/ ! /
I ~;' '
I ~ "
/ . / /
! 0
~iQ 480 f
AITACHMENT NO.2
SITE PLAN
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-Q034 Orchard's Marketplace. Public Conv\Planning\Staff Report MEMO.doc
5
TOWER PLAZA
~
()
:z
l'
,
~ ~'
'~~. ,. ,
Town Ai.)ENCIffl
- =. "'...IL.1."a ~SI
\<1 --= - _~ t: .,
L .
~
..
!(
10
l5
~
z
>
3
,,,1
Su~. No. Silo Sulle No- S1zo 'S..-. No- Size .
E-l 8M01
e..: 5.335
E-3 1.820
F-l ~1C14
1'-2 1.630
F-3 702
G ~.on
a loT,-
. :2lrl"OO
, .
M:ch"(
23,''1'1.
....1 600 Il-8 1.000
....2 . 2.760 8-t 600
.0.-3.4 1,195 o-U 8.200
....5 1.130 o-i 1.5$3
A-8 1,475 0.2 1,423
....7 595 0-3 1,680
11-1 2.4OlI D-4 7.070
11-2 2.600 0-5 759
B-3 1.soo tHI lI<!5.
~ 1,600 0-7 1,.412
a.5 1.200 tHI 1,400
!Hi 1.200 0-8 1,ll3O
11-7 600 0-10 lMO
Totel Squ.tro Footao. IGW .
Total ""rklno
All MEJ.5 ME APPROXIMATE .
l?E"viS'edlDr,;L y. /1,7-/ '170
121;907
680
~
(
OWNER DALLO & co. INC.
5075 FEDERAL BLVD.
SAN DIEGO. CA. 92102
PHONE (619) 527-3385 Fax ( 619) 527-3395
~
SITE PLAN
ORCHARD'S MARKETPLACE (dba)
27473 YNEZ ROAD, TEMECULA, CA.
1. P N, 7';J-/ J."7 co rs-
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0034 Orchard's Marketplace - Public Conv\Planning\Staff Report MEMO.doc
6
-L 8oyyo
11 -- 0 -- ~ -- ~ V~OO 0
~ ~ ( :z
0 CO
v --'...... -- - .-
~ ~ :3 / Wf~e- 30
0
~.
'''w1NE DD'AAT)oIJlT
081 I I. 0
I 0
Wf/JE
UJ , N'e.-
-1)/
-1\
"
IlEYJ TEA D,l.A
fi
o?&g <( c~,
o'fiJ AOJ>~ /
or
~~ DO ~~ ~oo ~o() "r~~;MG q~~ \
0\..6 <::> 0 """U () '0 0 '0 ~VfrJ-;/ . ",,4'l;)">
oQo ob~ ~~ . ~\~ (~!"~q ~~ ~~~,;..
OS"'AmGJt 0'"0 9- ~ )/ ~ ~ -
JJ; \/<~~ ,. 1'-' \l'
0~ ~~~4~
PP,Of'JT
EN11W<C!
- KlINT Of S- '-..
;l....
-=f
'-
,..
~
---'
o \S~-
l
FRON""
vmwlC!
ott ~c30
..;)
"'OOD{OWlC~PJ.
1
ORCHARD'S MARKETPLACE (dba)
27473 YNEZ ROAD, TEMECULA, CA.
(4"AiZTI4L- p..ooR. fLA~)
OWNER DALLO & CO. INC.
5075 FEDERAL BLVD.
SAN DIEGO, CA. 92102
PHONE (619) 527-3385 Fax (619) 527-2
ATTACHMENT NO.4
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0034 Orchard's Marketplace - Public Conv\Planning\Staff Report MEMO.doc
7
DALLO & Co., INC.
5075 FEDERAL BLVD.
SAN DIEGO, CA. 92102
(619) 527-3385 (619) 527-3395 fax
MARCH 24, 2006
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CA 92589-9033
Re: d.b.a. ORCHARD'S MARKETPLACE
27473 YNEZ RD.
TEMECULA. CA. 92591
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY APPLICATION SUBMISSION
DEAR SIR
DALLO & Co. INC. OWNS & OPERATES ORCHARDS MARKETPLACE IN THE TOWER PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER AND
HAS SINCE JUNE 5, 2002. DALLO HAS APPLIED FOR A TYPE 42 WINE TASTING LICENSE FROM AB.C.IN RIVERSIDE. IT IS
PLANNED TO ENCLOSE A SPACE WITH T STAND WROUGHT IRON FENCING TO ALLOW OUR WINE CUSTOMERS TO TASTE
SOME OF THE FINE WINES SOLD IN THE STORE. DALLO'S STORE HAS A TYPE 20 BEER & WINE LICENSE SINCE OPENING
AND MANY OF OUR CUSTOMERS HAVE REQUESTED TASTING ACTIVITY BEFORE MAKING A WINE PURCHASE IN THE STORE.
A.B.C. RIVERSIDE INSTRUCTED US TO MAKE A P.C. & N. APPLICATION TO THE CITY BEFORE APPROVING OUR LICENSE.
WE MET MR KNUTE NOLAND WHO PROVIDED THE APP. FORM AND OUTLINED ON THE FORM THE ITEMS WE NEEDED
TO COMPLETE AS A GOING CONCERN.
SECTION A. SITE PLAN CONTENT INCLUDED ON PLAN
SECTION B. FLOOR PLAN CONTENTS INCLUDED ON PLAN
SECTION C. STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS:
HRSJDAYS OF OPERATION: STORE: 8AM TO 9PM MON. THRU SAT. & 8AM TO 8PM SUNDAY
HRSJDAYS OF OPERATION: WINE EVENT. 10 AM. To 5 P.M. MON. THRU SUN.
NO. OF EMPLOYEES: CURRENT 22 RANGING TO 28 IN SUMMER
NO. OF REQUIRED PARKING: SINCE THE CUSTOMERS FOR WINE TASTING ARE MOSTLY REGULARS NO ADDED PARKING
IS NEEDED, THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF PARKING SPACES IN THE TOWER CENTER LOT
AVERAGE DAILY PEAK TRIPS. NOT APPLICABLE
TYPE OF EQUIPMENT: SIMPLE SERVE BAR & POS REGISTER. T STAND WROUGHT IRON INCLOSURE (OR SIMILAR), AND 107 REG'S
SIGNS AND ALSO FOUR TO SIX METAL ROUND TABLES WITH FOUR CHAIRS EACH.
OTHER DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPOSED USE: ONLY WINE TASTING WILL BE DONE.
SECURITY PLAN: INCLOSED AS MENTIONED ABOVE AND WILL BE MANNED BY AN EMPLOYEE WHO WILL SERVE THE
CUSTOMERS AND ENFORCE THE 107 REG'S. AT ALL TIMES.
APPROX. PERCENTAGE OF STORE PRODUCTS DEVOTED TO ALCOHOL: 10 PERCENT
ATTACHMENT NO.5
STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0034 Orchard's Marketplace. Public Conv\PJanning\Staff Report MEMO. doc
8
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY APPLICATION SUBMISSION (page two)
SECTION D: LETTER OF JUSTIFICATION: RESPONSES TO 10 QUESTIONS ON PAGE SEVEN OF APPLICATION
1 DALLO OPERATES A LARGE UPSCALE SUPERMARKET ENVIOROMENT TO ATTRACT LOCAL
RESIDENTS AND EMPLOYS LOCAL RESIDENTS. THE STORE SELLS GOURMET GROCERY
FOODS AND HEALTH FOODS PLUS A LARGE SELECTION OF FINE QUALITY WINES.
2. ORCHARD'S SPECIALIZES IN NO.1 FRUITS & VEGETABLES, GOURMET MEATS.AND
DELI/CHEESE, SEAFOODS, AND A IN. HOUSE BAKERY AND THE BEST QUALITY
WINES, INCLUDING TEMECULA'S FINEST. WE PLAN TO HAVE THE HIGHEST QUALITY
BASE OF ANY WINE TASTING ESTABLlSMENT IN THE AREA.
3. YES, WE CAN SELL OUR CUSTOMERS NOT ONLY LOCAL WINES, BUT LOCAL FRUITS,
VEGATABLES, AND BAKERY ITEMS. OUR CUSTOMERS ARE VERY DEMANDING
AND DISCRIMINATING IN THE SELECTION OF A HIGHER QUALITY AND PRICE FOR
THE BETTER PROOUCTS WE SELL COMPARED TO OTHER ESTABLISHMENTS.
4. OUR BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN TOWER PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER ON THE IMMEDIATE
EAST SIDE OF FREEWAY 15, ENCLOSED ON THE SOUTH SIDE BY RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.
WHICH PROVIDES ENTRY TO YNEZ RD. WHICH SERVICES ACCESS TO ALL BUSNESS'S
IN THE TOWER PLAZA CENTER THE NEAREST SIMILAR ESTABLISHMENT WE ARE AWARE OF
IS SEVERAL BLOCKS EAST ON TOWN COURT NEAR THE VONS CENTER
5. DALLO HAS OPERATED THE ORCHARDS STORE SINCE JUNE 2002 WITHOUT NOTICING
ANY SEASONAL EFFECT ON OUR CUSTOMER BASE.
6. TEMECULA HAS 46 WINE TASTING LICENSE'S IN OUR CENSUS TRACT AND ONL Y6 ARE
ALLOW EO BASED ON A POPULATION WITHIN THE TRACT OF 6.487. THE TRACT No. is 0432.16.
SINCE OUR CENSUS TRACT IS VIRTUALLY ALL COMMERCIAL THIS WAS THE CONSIDERATION
FOR THE CITY TO ACCEPT ADDITIONAL LICENSES ABOVE ALLOW ABLE. DALLO CORP. REQUEST
IT BE GIVEN THE SAME COSIDERATION FOR IT'S LICENSE REQUEST.
7. THERE ARE NOT ANY SENSITIVE USES WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE STORE (SCHOOLS, PARKS.
HOSPITALS, OR CHURCHES).
8. THERE ARE NO SENSITIVE ITEMS TO CONSIDER (SEE ITEM 7)
9. THERE ARE NOT ANY RESIDENTS IN OUR STORE'S OR SHOPPING CENTER'S AREA
WlU J J
__nn. ....._._\.I.n.n.n._..__
MIKE DALLO, PRESIDENT
10. OUR WINE TASTING EVENTS WOULD NOT ADD TO LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS.
ATTACHMENT NO.6
CENSUS TRACT MAP
G:\Planning\2006\PAOS.0034 Orchard's Marketplace - Public Conv\Planning\Staff Report MEMO.doc
9
--
-------
--
---~~- -~--
-==]
2000 Census Tract Boundaries
, - ". \~
." ",\ '"
.., ,. '.\\ ,
\ ',S~~~J;~~'5'{~~~"'Y'} 043Z16. ...
. .' ", ';~,c;;J ., ;~\ ,'"C~;i",\, ..
...., .~..;iG,>':>"'0~~~"\:" ."":'<')~~~~";~~~~,~~;!'~..
" :~.,..\!."",..\.~. ."
,'. ~.. '~ -",i<.'~ .\, \
~' . ~ ~ ". yi,i;'i.\<V .
. .'''.; . ,-,'O'ili.'~, "2~ 1.11I,":;
I 04320-;n~~.l";f::;
'~, . ~.\:. . ~~%~~:,~ii
^'. . 1<'" ,
,....., ~1.<:. ,
~" '.:r""'''-''''
~~'''.. ',~-.\>'
, ,\.~~~f
'."."':.'
'f'"
043212
043223
.'
..
I' ,
I'
;,....-'"
.~
"",,"-w
;~, .'0.
i
, ,l \ .
,II',
~!"
\'
~
1\
I
\
I
I
I!
II
l
d
II
/'
II 3000
N
A
o
3000
6000 Feel
,
~-
'_''!;'''''''Hl:1r_','
:1
I
'I
:1
043203
"'.
#"
v_~
I
il
.':,.-,'- ,
'7 -'
,I
:1
""',
'f"'.-i- .
.' 04322,1
"
~
\
]
,f>IU9A....
/'"
I
I
I
/1
~ I
,
I
i
. 1,,1
, I
'0'-'1
I
,
043222.
/'"
.. .~
~-_. \--
,~-~-=~ \,,-.t-<_\j::!
, "
'.
"
. .
.~.; ~_.) :':}~
04,~~~:4
'," "....~
- -~- i ,
'.!,-
'x ',"-:,,-"'/ ,'" ~ '
".. ',! ~"._," ",.
; I
.\'-'
r:\gis\census dala\censlls2000.apr
I
,I
ATTACHMENT NO.7
ABC LICENSES AND TYPES SUMMARY
G:\Planning\2006\PA06'0034 Orchard's Marketplace. Public Conv\Planning\Staff Report MEMO. doc
10
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
COMMON ABC LICENSE TYPES
AND THEIR BASIC PRIVILEGES
UCENSE
TYPE
01
02
20
21
23
40
41
42
47
48
49
ABC-616 (4/04)
State of California
DESCRIPTION
BEER MANUFACTURER - (Large Brewery) Authorizes the sale of beer to any person holding a license
authorizing the sale of beer, and to consumers for consumption on or off the manufacturer's licensed
premises. Without any additional licenses, may sell beer and wine, regardless of source, to consumers for
consumption at a bona fide public eating place on the manufacturer's licensed premises or at a bona fide
eating place contiguous to the manufacturer's licensed premises. May conduct beer tastings under
specified conditions (Section 23357.3l. Minors are allowed on the premises.
WINEGROWER - (Winery) Authorizes the sale of wine and brandy to any person holding a license
authorizing the sale of wine and brandy, and to consumers for consumption off the premises where sold.
Authorizes the sale of all wines and brandies, regardless of source, to consumers for consumption on the
premises in a bona fide eating place that is located on the licensed premises or on premises owned by the
licensee that are contiguous to the licensed premises and operated by and for the licensee. May possess
wine and brandy for use in the preparation of food and beverage to be consumed at the bona fide eating
place. May conduct winetastings under prescribed conditions (Section 23356.1; Rule 53). Minors are
allowed on the premises.
OFF SALE BEER & WINE - (Package Store) Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off
the eremises where sold. Minors are allowed on the premises.
OFF SALE GENERAL - (Package Store) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for
consumption off the {'remises where sold. Minors are allowed on the premises.
SMALL BEER MANUFACTURER - (Brew Pub or Micro-brewery) Authorizes the same privileges and
restrictions as a Type 01. A brewpub is typically a very small brewery with a restaurant. A micro-brewery
is a small-scale brewery operation that typically is dedicated solely to the production of specialty beers,
althou.e;h some do have a restaurant or pub on their manufacturin.e; plant.
ON SALE BEER - (Bar, Tavern) Authorizes the sale of beer for consumption on or off the premises
where sold. No wine or distilled spirits may be on the premises. Full meals are not required; however,
sandwiches or snacks must be available. Minors are allowed on the premises.
ON SALE BEER & WINE - EATING PLACE - (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for
consumption on or off the premises where sold. Distilled spirits may not be on the premises (except
brandy, rum, or liqueurs for use solely for cooking purposes). Must operate and maintain the licensed
premises as a bona fide eating place. Must make actual and substantial sales of meals, during the normal
meal hours that they are open, at least five days a week. Normal mealtimes are 6:00 a.m. -
9:00 a.m., 11 :00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Premises that are not open five days a week
must serve meals on the days they are open. Minors are allowed on the premises.
ON SALE BEER & WINE - PUBLIC PREMISES - (Bar, Tavern) Authorizes the sale of beer and wine
for consumption on or off the premises where sold. No distilled spirits may be on the premises. Minors are
not allowed to enter and remain (see Section 25663.5 for exception, musicians). Food service is not
required.
ON SALE GENERAL - EATING PLACE - (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled
spirits for consumption on the licensed premises. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off
the licensed premises. Must operate and maintain the licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. Must
make actual and substantial sales of meals, during the nonnal meal hours that they are open, at least five
days a week. Normal mealtimes are 6:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m., 11 :00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.
Premises that are not open five days a week must serve meals on the days they are open. Minors are
allowed on the premises.
ON SALE GENERAL - PUBLIC PREMISES - (Bar, Night Club) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and
distilled spirits for consumption on the premises where sold. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for
consumption off the premises where sold. Minors are not allowed to enter and remain (see Section 25663.5
for exception. musicians). Food service is not required.
ON SALE GENERAL - SEASONAL ~ Authorizes the same privileges and restrictions as provided for a
Type 47 license except it is issued for a specific season. Inclusive dates of operation are listed on the
license certificate.
0",,~'~'EDU0.'>;'O
"". . ~:, 't
;. '.....Do
0'-. '"
;",;: ....:",.:':!t"!?
<"b"OLA....Q
LICENSE
TYPE
51
52
57
59
60
61
67
70
75
80
ABC-616 (4/04)
DESCRIPTION
CLUB - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits. to members and guests only, for
consumption on the premises where sold. No off-sale privileges. Food service is 110t required. Minors are
allowed on the premises.
VETERAN'S CLUB - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only,
for consumption on the premises where sold. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine, to members and guest
only, for consumption off the licensed premises. Food service is not required. Minors are allowed on the
~remises.
SPECIAL ON SALE GENERAL - Generally issued to certain organizations who cannot qualifY for club
licenses. Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only, for
consumption on the premises where sold. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine, to members and guests
only, for consumption off the licensed premises. Food service is not required. Minors are allowed on the
~remises.
ON SALE BEER AND WINE - SEASONAL - Authorizes the same privileges as a Type 41. Issued for a
soecific season. Inclusive dates of ooeration are listed on the license certificate.
ON SALE BEER- SEASONAL - Authorizes the sale of beer only for consumption on or off the
premises where sold. Issued for a specific season. [nclusive dates of operation are listed on the license
certificate. Wine or distilled ~'pirits may not be on the premises. Minors are allowed on the o!emises.
ON SALE BEER - PUBLIC PREMISES - (Bar, Tavern) Authorizes the sale of beer only for
consumption on or offthe licensed premises. Wine or distiHed spirits may not be on the premises. Minors
are not allowed to enter and remain (warning signs reQuired). Food service is not reauired.
BED AND BREAKFAST INN - Authorizes the sale of wine purchased from a licensed winegrower or
wine wholesaler only to registered guests of the establishment for consumption on the premises. No beer
or distilled spirits may be on the premises. Wine shall not be given away to guests, but the price of the
wine shall be included in the price of the overnight transient occupancy accommodation. Removal of wine
from the grounds is not oennitted. Minors are allowed on the oremises.
ON SALE GENERAL - RESTRICTIVE SERVICE - Authorizes the sale or furnishing of beer, wine
and distilled spirits for consumption on the premises to the establishment's overnight transient occupancy
guests or their invitees. This license is normaHy issued to "suite-type" hotels and motels, which exercise
the license Q.rivileges for guests' "complimentary" hanpy hour. Minors are allowed on the premises.
ON SALE GENERAL - BREWPUB - (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits
for consumption on a bona fide eating place plus a limited amount of brewing of beer. Also authorizes the
sale of beer and wine only for consumption off the premises where sold. Minors are allowed on the
premises.
BED AND BREAKFAST INN - GENERAL - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits
purchased from a licensed wholesaler or winegrower only to registered guests of the establishment for
consumption on the premises. Alcoholic beverages shall not be given away to guests, but the price of the
alcoholic beverage shaH be included in the price of the overnight transient occupancy accommodation.
Removal of alcoholic beverages from the grounds is not oennitted. Minors are allowed on the oremises,
",,~'~<EDUC.,,>
5",::: 9t
~"L ,.~~."Pi
7<,('l ;'., ~
OJ10lA.rl-'O
ITEM #5
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Cheryl Kitzerow, Associate Planner
DATE: May 17, 2006
SUBJECT: Planning Application No. PA06-0053 for Roripaugh Ranch
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A Major Modification to Conditions of Approval for three Tentative Tract Maps within Roripaugh
Ranch. The City Attorney has determined that the subject request could be reviewed by the
Planning Commission and does not require City Council action.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Tract Map No. 29353 was approved by the City Council on November 26,2002. The map
involved the subdivision of 804.7 acres into 39 lots (Planning Areas) and eight street lots within the
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area. Condition of Approval No. 15 of this map prohibits the
issuance of building permits (with the exception of the fire station site) for any lots created by the
tentative map. The applicant is requesting to modify this condition to allow the issuance of non-
residential building permits for lots created by the tentative map. Tentative Tract Map No. 29353
was the "A" Map within Roripaugh Ranch, considered to be used for financing purposes and to
create the individual Planning Areas consistent with the Specific Plan. The condition to restrict
issuance of building permits for these planning areas was included because it was understood that
subsequent tentative maps would be submitted for future residential developments. However,
Tentative Tract Map No. 29353 also created lots for Private Recreation Facilities, City Parks, and
Schools, for which additional tract maps would not be required. The existing Condition of Approval
prohibits the issuance of building permits for any of these lots. The proposed revision to clarify the
restriction on the issuance of residential building permits is appropriate. No building permits would
be issued unless all previous Conditions of Approval, mitigation measures and requirements of the
Development Agreement are completed.
Tentative Tract Map No. 29661 was also approved by the City Council on November 26,2002. The
project involved the subdivision of 158 acres into 509 residential lots and 20 open space lots within
Planning Areas 1A, 18,2,3, 4A, 4B, 5, 6, 7A, 78, 7C, 8 and 9A (known as the 'panhandle') ofthe
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area. Condition of Approval No. 19 requires landscape plans for the
parkways, medians, and slope and fuel modification areas directly adjacent to roadways be
submitted and approved r;>rior to the aoqroval of the Final Mao. The applicant is requesting to
modify this condition to defer landscape plans to be submitted and approvedoriorto the issuance of
the first buildina oermit for each olannina area, as well as to clarify this requirement as it pertains to
Homeowner's Association (HOA) maintained landscaping. The existing condition does not
differentiate between Community Service District (CSD) and Homeowner Association maintained
areas. The proposed revision would specify this requirement for HOA areas (CSD requirements are
conditioned separately). In addition, the timing would be revised to require submittal and approval
prior to building permit issuance, which is consistent with the City's current development policy.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06 0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps - Major Mod\Planning\PC Staff Report.DOC
I
Condition of Approval No. 27 for Tract 29661 and Condition of Approval No. 24 for Tract 32004
(which was approved by the City Council on January 11. 2005 and involved the subdivision of two
acres into six new residential lots in Planning Area lA) requires the submittal of a landscape
maintenance bond prior to the issuance of the first building permit. The applicant is requesting to
defer the timing of this requirement to prior to occupancy. These existing conditions require a bond
be submitted prior to issuance of the first building permit however the plantings are not required to
be completed until occupancy. Revising these conditions to postpone the submittal of the bond to
prior to occupancy is appropriate and consistent with the City's development process.
Staff has reviewed the proposed modifications and has determined the changes further clarify the
original intent of the approved project and the revised conditions are consistent with current
processing requirements.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff has determined that the project is consistent with the previously adopted Environmental Impact
Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan certified on November 26, 2002. A Notice of
Determination will be filed in accordance with CEQA Section 15162 - Subsequent EIRs and
Negative Declarations.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the requested changes to the Conditions
of Approval for Tentative Tract Map Nos. 29353, 29661. and 32004 within Roripaugh Ranch, subject
to the Conditions of Approval.
ATTACHMENTS
1. PC Resolution 06-_ - Blue Page 3
Exhibit A - Revised Conditions of Approval
2. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Area Reference Map - Blue Page 4
3. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan - Planning AreafTentative Tract Map - Blue Page 5
4. Proposed Modifications (strikethrough version) - Blue Page 6
G:\Planning\2006\PA06~OO53 Roripaugh SP Tracl Maps - Major Mod\Plannlllg\PC Staff Report.DOC
2
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PC RESOLUTION 06-_
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-OO53 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps - Major Mod\Planning\PC Staff Report.DOC
3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA06-0053, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL FOR THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS WITHIN
RORIPAUGH RANCH. SPECIFICALLY, TO MODIFY
CONDITION NO. 15 FOR TRACT 29353 TO ALLOW THE
ISSUANCE OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS.
ALSO INCLUDED IN THE REQUEST IS A MODIFICATION TO
CONDITION NOS. 19 AND 27 FOR TRACT 29661 AND NO. 24
FOR TRACT 32004 TO CLARIFY TIMING OF LANDSCAPE
PLAN APPROVAL AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BOND
SUBMITTAL FOR COMMON AREA LANDSCAPING. THE
PROJECT SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE FUTURE
INTERSECTIONS OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS AND
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND NICHOLAS ROAD AND
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD
Section 1. On November 26,2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted
and certified an Environmental Impact Report (PA94-0076), a General Plan Amendment (PA99-
0298), the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (PA94-0075), a Change of Zone (PA94-0075), a
Development Agreement (PA99-0299) and Tentative Tract Maps 29661 (PA01-0253) and
29353 (PA01-0230).
Section 2. On January 11, 2005, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved
Tentative Tract Map 32004 (PA04-0369) and Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No.1
(PA04-0371) to change Planning Area 7B from Open Space (OS) to Low Medium Residential
(LM), Planning Area 10 from Low Density Residential (L) to Low-Estate Residential (L-E), and
make other changes to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan.
Section 3. On February 28, 2006, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved
the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment NO.2 (PA05-0341) to change the land use
designation for Planning Area 338 from Low Density Residential (L) to Open Space (OS) to
accommodate park and ride and trail head uses, and to relocate the park and ride facility from
Planning Area 11 to Planning Area 338.
Section 4. Ashby USA filed Planning Application No. PA06-0053 to modify certain
conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Maps 29353, 29661 and 32004 within Roripaugh
Ranch ("Application").
Section 5. The Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental
Quality Act.
Section 6. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application on May 17, 2006 to consider the application for the Project and environmental
review, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this
matter.
G:\Planning\2000\PA06-0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps ~ Major Mod\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc
I
Section 7. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 16.09.140 of the Subdivision Ordinance.
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan and the City
of Temecula Municipal Code;
Tentative Tract Map Nos. 29353, 29661 and 32004 are consistent with the General Plan,
the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, Municipal Code and Roripaugh
Ranch Specific Plan as designed. The modification to the conditions of approval for
these maps would not cause the project design to change and therefore the project
remains consistent with the policies and standards in the General Plan, Subdivision
Ordinance, Development Code, Municipal Code and Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan.
B. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract
entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a
Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be
too small to sustain their agricultural use;
Tentative Tract Map Nos. 29353, 29661, and 32004 did not include land designated for
conservation or agricultural use and has never been entered into any Williamson Act
Contracts. The major modification to change the conditions of approval for these maps
would not include any land used for agriculture not subject to Williamson Act Contracts.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the tentative map;
The approved Tentative Maps included subdividing 804 acres for residential,
commercial, and public uses consistent with the General Plan and Roripaugh Ranch
Specific Plan. The proposed major modification would not change the type of
development nor the density per the approved maps.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions
of Approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
An EIR was prepared, adopted and certified for the project site and the Tentative Tract
Maps. The major modification to change Conditions of Approval for the map would not
result in any impacts to the environment.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems;
The approved Tentative Maps were reviewed and condition by the Fire Safety Division
and the Building Safety Division. Further, provisions are made in the General Plan,
Development Code and Specific Plan to ensure that the public health, safety and welfare
are safeguarded. The project design is consistent with these provisions. The subject
major modification would not modify the design of the subdivision nor the type of
improvements required.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps - Major Mod\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc
2
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible;
The design of the approved subdivisions provides for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior to the construction of
any structures the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building
Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements
for energy conservation. The subject major modification would not modify the design of
the subdivision nor opportunities for passive or natural heating or cooling.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially
equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided;
All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the approved Tentative
Tract Maps. The subject major modification would not modify the design of the
subdivision nor the type of improvements required.
H.
(Quimby);
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements
The project area is within an approved specific plan. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific
Plan was designed and analyzed for a maximum of 2,015 residential units and parkland
has been dedicated using this number. The proposed major modification will not modify
the maximum number of units in the specific plan area and is therefore consistent with
Quimby.
Section 8. Environmental Cornoliance. On November 26, 2002, the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 02-111 certifying the Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh
Ranch Specific Plan and Related Planning Applications, including the Development Agreement
("EIR"). The Planning Commission finds, based on the administrative record, that the EIR
properly addressed all of the environmental issues encompassed within the Major Modification
application and that: (1) there have been no substantial changes in the Project which require
major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) no substantial
changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project has been
undertaken which require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects; and (3) no new information of substantial importance exists, which was not know or
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the
certification of the EIR which shows the Project would have one or more significant effects or a
more severe significant impact not discussed in the EIR or that mitigation measures or
alternatives not found feasible would in fact be feasible or that other mitigation measures or
alternatives would substantially reduce one or more of the significant effects. Therefore, neither
a subsequent nor a supplemental EIR is required and the Planning Commission recommends
that a Notice of Determination (Determination of Consistency) for which an Environmental
Impact Report was previously adopted (Sec. 15162 - Subsequent EIRs and Negative
Declarations) be filed.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06 0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps - Major Mod\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc
3
Section 9. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves
Planning Application No. PA06-0053, all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project
specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0053 Roripaugh SPTract Maps - Major Mod\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc
4
Section 10. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 17'h day of May 2006.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 06- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17'h day of May,
2006, by the following vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps - Major Mod\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc
5
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Map~ - Major Mod\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc
6
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA06-0053
Project Description:
A Major Modification to Conditions of Approval for the
Tentative Tract Maps within Roripaugh Ranch.
Specifically, to modify Condition No. 15 for Tract 29353
to allow the issuance of non-residential building
permits. Also included in the request is a modification
to Condition Nos. 19 and 27 for Tract 29661 and No. 24
for Tract 32004 to clarify timing of landscape plan
approval and landscape maintenance bond submittal
for common area landscaping
DIF:
Per Development Agreement
TUMF:
Per Development Agreement
MSHCP:
Per Development Agreement
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
May 17, 2006
May 17, 2008
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the
applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps - Major Mod\Planning\Dratt COAs.doc
,
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly
notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3. Project is subject to all conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map Nos. 29353,
29661 and 32004.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
G:\Planning\2006\PA06.0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps - Major Mod\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
2
ATTACHMENT NO.2
RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREA REFERENCE MAP
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps ~ Major Mod\Planning\PC Staff Report.DOC
4
/.
\
\ // I
\' '-,
\\ '
,1/
\mID
!~
,~
-~
;' /~~
, I
I,' __'
It-/
, .
//
.,
'~rr-~ _
/ - -~' '\ / """'-
... I L \ r .,;';""1 /......... .
7" ,j J \~ /----;/ _ I
/ ~-
( ~~/
"-
\.
" JI
/7
J. ' ,
J~ /
, '
J . 1'1
'. / II
\' ,. /1
" >.-'/
"
('''J' .
L I I \Ic~ c. -. :~~:C< "
~ 1 --- "-0/ .",
- -- , \
\- ,
\/ ~~- '- .- ~~.
L /
\,~<' /
~( . ." I
;'<:F'~..,z
"./ \ '!-~ .
;'<,. I"
~. .,
\
\ \ '\
-"'--''----- ~ [ --
ATTACHMENT NO.3
RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
PLANNING AREASfTENTATIVE TRACT MAP AREAS
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps - Major Mod\Planning\PC Staff Report.DOC
5
~
5
If I
~
~
--...,- -
"~
<If> ."'t)
4A
"'
lUAC
10001111
t fA Thna 4 f!1
~--
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32004-
SUBDIVIDED ADDITIONAL AREA OF PA 1A
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29661 ""':.:
SUBDIVIDED PANHANDLE
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29353 - CREATED
PLANNING AREAS, INCLUDED ENTIRE
BOUNDARY OF RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC
PLAN
(I). "l..:' ~
"-I
I )?ollp;/Il!d I ~(#JV?allcl!
FIGURE 2-3
-----
8
c"'
4B
"'
13
'"
HUAC
~
I
~ III
",
II
I
17
"'
40.2"(::
1720U"
J
l} l)1?
31,1,10
JOOl/a
II
II
c,
(1J'
CL
'-
Q)
.....
(I),
(1Ji
::E I.
ci
O~
:;::1
~I
::l
e
o
(1J
::l
.....
0-
~
C
o
<..:>
ATTACHMENT NO.4
PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS
G:\Planning\2006\P A06-0053 Roripaugh SP Tract Maps - Major Mod\Planning\PC Staff Report.DOC
6
PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS
(Additional text is shown in bold, deleted text is shown in ~trikoout.)
"A" MAP - Tract MaD 2935~
Condition of Approval No. 15. Modify the condition as shown below.
"15. With exception of lot 22 (fire station site) no residential building permits shall be issued
for the lots created by this tentative map."
"B" MAP - Tract MaD 29661
Condition of Approval No. 19. Modify the condition as shown below.
"19. Prior to the approval cf t~E Fi:Kll Map, the Innd~cape plnn~ f::: I'::: f?:::k.....ays, medians,
and slope and fuel modification area~ directly adjacent to roadways .,hS" '?'.) submitted
=:::2 =:;:pr-oved. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit in each planning
area, related landscape plans for HOA maintained parkways, medians, slopes, and
fuel modification areas directly adjacent to roadways shall be submitted and
approved."
Condition of Approval No. 27. Delete the condition and create a new item "a" under Condition of
Approval No. 34 to retain the requirement in a more appropriate location as shown below.
"27. Perfs'~s::::e securitiEs, it. zlT.:Junts to be dEIE:~::1ed by the Director E~ ?:2::::ing, to
:;'l::'s::~'.)e the maintonance of ths f?'S::~:1gs within private common area~ for a period of
ooe-y:::::, ':: s::cordance with tho approved con~trllction land~cnpe and irrigation plan,
~hall be filed with the Cs~~\.::::ty De'lelopr.-:::::~ ~epartmer.~ ?:z:::::::;j Divi~ion for one
year from the completion of the land~caping. l\ftEr that year, if the land~caping and
irrigation ~y:~~~ ':::':e--bes:: ~Z:::~2:Re€I--i:: Z s3R€l'+::::: .,sl'.,'actory to ''::: ':':rector of
P:Z:::::t.d s':zlI ts r:)loa~od."
"a. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning,
to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings within private common areas for a
period of one year, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and
irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from the
completion of the landscaping. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of
Planning, the performance securities shall be released."
'I' ~.~~--~' (l= < n -:. [i '\// i,._b~
I' ~J', IL -'II \, ,
1'1
?GOb
'I i.\PK n
By ______
Proposed Modifications
Revised 04/05/2006
"8" MAP - Tract MaD 32004
Condition of Approval No. 24. Delete the condition and create a new item "a" under Condition of
Approval No. 30 to retain the requirement in a more appropriate location as shown below.
"24. Performanoe seouritiec, ir. 2.1T.:Junl!; to ee determined BY the Director of ~!::::::'::a.--te
1f22".rznte&-tl12 ::':2:::~enance of the plantings within r";":"~common areas f?" :' priod of
ooe-y?""; :n aooordanoo witt:: tr.s apr:Jvoa construotion landsoape an~ :"~:;?~ion plan,
shall be filoa with the Planning Department for one year from the oompletion of the
landsoaping. After that )'2a~, i~ the I3ndso3pinS ::::~ ;~~;g3lion systs::,: ~::':e beon
m:J'::~~:::92 ':: :: :;ooGffis:: SZt:s'::ll;tOry t:: t~:: Director 0' nl::::::'ng, the bow' :~::" ge
released."
"a. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning,
to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings within private common areas for a
period of one year, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and
irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from the
completion of the landscaping. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of
Planning, the bond shall be released."
Proposed Modifications
2
Revised 04/05/2006
ITEM #6
DATE OF MEETING:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
CEOA:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Mav 17, 2006
Harmonv Linton
TITLE:
Assistant Pianner
Planning Application Nos. PA05-0236 and PA05-0235, a Tentative
Tract Map to create one lot for condo purposes and a Development
Plan to construct 110 age-restricted condo units and a recreational
facility on 7.5 acres located on the northwest corner of Margarita
Road and Dartolo Road (APN 959-080-011, 959-080-012, 959-080-
013)
IZI Approve with Conditions
o Deny
o Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
o Categorically Exempt
o Notice of Determination
o Negative Declaration
(Section)
(Class)
(Section)
IZI Miti9ated Ne9ative Declaration with Monitorin9 Plan
DEIR
G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Mulli-FamilylPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
1
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: Vicki Mata
Date of Completion: AUGust 9, 2005
Mandatory Action Deadline Date: May 17, 2006
General Plan Designation: Professional Office (PO)
Zoning Designation: Professional Office (PO)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant/Residential
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant
Gas Station/Office
Vacant/Commercial
Vacant/Approved Hospital
Lot Area:
7.4 acres net
Total Floor Area/Ratio:
.39
Landscape Area/Coverage:
30% maximum
Parking Required/Provided:
Senior Citizen Housina.
55 covered spaces required/11 0 covered spaces provided
22 guest parking spaces required/26 guest parking spaces
provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the
applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
A Pre-Application was submitted on April 29, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on May 24, 2006
where staff provided feedback on the site plan and architecture, specifically referencing the
massing of the clubhouse, and the need for more articulation of the individual units and
additional building detail.
The formal Tentative Tract Map and Development Plan applications were submitted on August
9, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on September 22, 2005. Between several meetings and
resubmittals, staff worked with the applicant and provided feedback on the architecture and
site plan.
G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
2
Senior citizen housing is a permitted use in the Professional Office zone. Per Table 17.08.030
within the City of Temecula Development Code, senior housing residential projects in the PO
zone shall use the development and performance standards for the High Density Residential
zone. This zone allows a maximum 30% of lot coverage. The proposed lot coverage is 37%.
On December 13, 2005, staff met with the applicant and the City Attorney to discuss the issue
of lot coverage. The applicant offered and has been conditioned to record a written offer to
dedicate 12 additional feet along the property frontage of Margarita Road, in exchange for the
additional lot coverage. This was determined to be acceptable by the City Attorney.
ANALYSIS
Tentative Mao
The proposed tentative tract map (TIM 33891) would consolidate three lots on the west side of
Margarita Road into one condominium lot. The condominium lot would be configured to create
110 age-restricted units. The proposed tentative tract map would allow for individual
ownership of the residential units. This project has been conditioned that the Final Map
(33891) must record prior to issuance of a building permit in order to ensure conformance with
the Development Code. CC&R's will be reviewed and must be approved by the City Attorney
prior to map recordation as well.
Site Plan
With the exception of lot coverage, the project conforms to the development regulations of the
Professional Office (PO) zoning district. The building setbacks meet the minimum
requirements of the Development Code. In addition, the site plan provides adequate
circulation for emergency vehicles. The High Density Residential zone permits a maximum
density of 30 du/acre for senior housing projects, and the project proposes 14.67 du/acre.
The two-story residential units have been oriented with the garages facing the interior of the
site, with guest parking being placed around the site to allow for convenient access. The
building orientation and landscaping provide for an enhanced and interesting streetscape
along both Margarita Road and Dartolo Road. Four buildings will have four units, five buildings
will have six units, and eight buildings will have eight units. They are proposed to have a
stacked configuration with two stories overall. The average building setback is 20 feet along
Margarita Road and Dartolo Road. In addition, a wrought iron fence will be used along
Margarita Road and Dartolo Road to provide for a more pedestrian feel in these areas, and to
enhance the overall appearance of the site.
A 1,622 square foot recreational facility will allow residents to have access to a handicap
accessible pool and meeting rooms. A pathway with benches has been provided from the rear
of the property to the recreation facility to allow for convenient pedestrian movement.
Access to the proposed site will be provided through a right in/right out entrance off of
Margarita Road and a fully accessed entry from Dartolo Road. Both entries into the site will be
gated. A 24 foot-wide drive is provided throughout the site's interior.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Sliver Oaks Multi-Family\PJanning\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
3
The parking for the project exceeds the requirements required by the Development Code for
senior citizen housing. In addition, sidewalks have been provided throughout the site to allow
for easy access to all areas of the site.
Architecture
The project proposes 17 buildings and a recreational facility based on the Craftsman
architectural style with decorative stone columned porches, exposed rafters, stone chimneys
and gabled tiled roofs. The units facing the street will have upper level balconies and ground
level patios. Additional articulation has been provided through the use of shutters, hardy
siding, and a variation in the garage doors.
The proposed project has been conditioned to internalize the exposed gutters and downspouts
that are visible along the right-of-ways in order be in compliance with the City's Design
Guidelines (Condition of Approval number 47). Staff feels that all gutters and downspouts
internal to the site and not visible from the public right-of-way will meet the City's Design
Guidelines if painted to match the surface to which the elements are attached.
Materials and Colors
The project includes variation in both building materials and colors, which help to provide
variation and interest, as well as break up the massing of two-story units. The elevations
proposed provide two color schemes which will work to bring variety to the street scene. Stone
and hardy-plank siding has been integrated into the elevations to give variety to the materials
used. Roof materials are compatible with the elevation style and complement the primary
building color.
Building Placement
The buildings have been plotted to give variation to the street scene. The buildings have been
placed in such a way as to avoid repetition of the same materials for the elevations.
Attached Residential Units (17 Buildings)
Recreational Facility
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Plan 1 - 1,230 Sq. Ft.
Plan 2 - 1,410 Sq. Ft.
Plan 2B - 1,382 Sq. Ft
Plan 3 - 1,760 Sq. Ft
Plan 4 - 1,980 Sq. Ft.
Plan 4B -1,820 Sq. Ft.
1.
1,622 Sq. Ft.
The project proposes four floor plans with a slight variation in the square footage of plan two
and plan four with a Craftsman themed elevation with two variations in materials.
Building Elements/Mass, Height, and Scale
The proposed project includes seventeen two-story buildings with two variations in materials.
The proposed maximum height for the units is 29'6".
G:IPlanning\200SIPAOS.0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
4
The proposed project includes two-story elevations that incorporate one-story elements. The
units provide adequate articulation in roof forms and offsets to reduce the massing, and the
elevations are visually broken up with offset stories, changes in materials, and sloping roof
lines. The buildings have been enhanced with window shutters on both the first and second
story elevations, rafters exposed on the balconies and many of the entryways, and with the
pop-out elements on the second story. Most of these elements have been carried around to
the rear of the structures.
Landscaping
The landscaping plan as conditioned conforms to the landscape requirements of the
Development Code and Design Guidelines. The project proposes to landscape 37 percent of
the site. The project provides landscaping around the perimeter of the site and between the
structures. Thirty-six inch box Golden Raintree has been proposed along Dartolo and thirty-six
inch box Australian Willows have been proposed along Margarita Road. The entry into the site
from Margarita has been proposed to be lined with California Fan Palms. A landscaped trail is
provided from the rear of the property to the recreation facility. Benches have been placed
along this trail to provide an additional convenience for the residents.
A six-foot high wrought iron fence with pilasters has been proposed along the perimeter
adjacent to Margarita Road and Dartolo Road, and a grey CMU block wall has been proposed
along the western and northern perimeters of the property. Staff has conditioned the project to
provide fence and wall plans prior to building permit issuance for approval, as the block wall
was a recent addition to the plans and is lacking details (Condition of Approval number 60).
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Initial Study was prepared and indicates that the project will have the following potential
significant impacts unless mitigation measures are included as conditions of approval. Based
on the following mitigations, staff recommends adoption of the mitigated Negative Declaration
of the project.
IMPACT SUMMARY
Air Quality - The project may violate an air 1.
quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality
violation; result in cumulatively
considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is 2.
non-attainment under an applicable federal
or state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone 3.
precursors); exposes sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations.
MITIGATION SUMMARY
Utilize diesel powered equipment equipped
with a cooled exhaust gas recirculation
system during demolition, site preparation,
grading and construction.
Use aqueous diesel fuel for the diesel
powered equipment operated during the
demolition and construction phase.
Limit the application of architectural
coatings to 225 gallons per week and/or
use zero volatile organic compound (VaG)
paint during construction.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
5
Biological Resources - The project may 1.
interfere substantially with the movement of
a native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident
or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede
the use of native wildlife nursery sites;
conflict with local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a
tree preservation policy or ordinance.
Cultural Resources - The project may 1.
cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archeological resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5; directly or
indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature;
disturb human remains, including those
interred outside for formal cemeteries.
4.
Provide a water truck to continuously,
"water down" the graded areas to reduce .
the amount of dust from excavation.
During grading activities, the site shall be
watered down no less than three times per
day. In addition, all heavy equipment must
be regularly maintained to reduce
emissions.
Vegetation clearing shall be initiated prior
to February 15 or after August 15. If this is
not feasible, all suitable habitats shall be
thoroughly surveyed for the presence of
nests by a qualified biologist no more than
5 days before commencement of any tree
removal.
An assessment shall be performed by a
qualified archeologist in conjunction with
the Pechanga Band of Luiseiio Indians in
order to determine whether there are
cultural resources on the property and
evaluate the significance of any such
resource.
2. Enter into a Treatment Agreement with the
Pechanga Band of Luiseiio Indians to
address the treatment and disposition of
cultural resources and human remains that
may be uncovered during construction as
well as provisions for tribal monitors.
3. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Band of
Luiseiio Indians shall be allowed to monitor
all grading, excavating and ground-
breaking activities, including further
surveys, to be compensated by the project
proponent.
4. The landowner shall agree to relinquish to
relinquish ownership of all cultural
resources, including all Luiseiio sacred
items, burial goods and all archeological
artifacts that are found on the project site to
the Pechanga Band of Luiseiio Indians for
proper treatment and disposition.
5. All sacred sites within the project area are
to be avoided and preserved.
G:\PJanning\200S\PAOS.0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
6
Geology and Soils - The project may 1 .
expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury or death involving strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic i
related ground failure, including , 2.
liquefaction.
Noise - The project may expose people to 1.
or generate noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies. 2.
Submit appropriate soils and geologic
hazard investigation reports, including a
cone penetration test to verify lateral extent
of liquefiable zone and total settlement.
The site shall be cleared of vegetation,
trees, structures and debris.
3.
Over-excavation shall
accordance with
Geotechnical Report.
be performed in
the Preliminary
4. The bottom of the excavations shall be
scarified in accordance with the Preliminary
Geotechnical report.
5. Earth materials at the site shall be
excavatable with conventional heavy-duty
earth moving equipment.
6. Earth movement activities that they shall
adhere to all recommendations advanced
in the relevant soils and geologic hazard
investigation reports approved by the City
of Temecula.
7. Complete further investigation using Cone
Penetration Tests and Geo Probe Tests to
verify the lateral extent of liquefaction and
associated settlement.
8. Submit and updated Geotechnical Analysis
to the Planning Department for review.
A construction related noise mitigation plan
shall be submitted to the City for review
and approval.
All construction equipment, fixed or mobile,
shall be equipped with properly operating
and maintained mufflers, consistent with
manufactures' standards. All stationary
construction equipment shall direct noise
away from the noise sensitive receptors
nearest the project site.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi.Family\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
7
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution
approving Tentative Tract Map 33891 and Development Plan with the attached Conditions of
Approval.
FINDINGS
Tentative Tract Map (16.09.040)
1. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the City of Temecula
Municipal Code.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that Tentative Tract Map No. 33891 is
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the Municipal Code because
the project meets design standards as required in the Development Code, General
Plan, and the Municipal Code.
2. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract
entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is
subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division
of the land will not be too small to sustain agricultural use.
The proposed land division is not land designated for conservation or agricultural use.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the Tentative Map.
The project consists of a Tract Map for condominium purposes on property designated
as Professional Office. Senior citizen housing is a use consistent with the General Plan
and Development Code for areas designated as Professional Office. The proposed
tentative tract map conforms to the proposed Development Plan (PA05-0235) for
residential condominium units. The Development Plan must be approved prior to
recordation of the final map, thereby ensuring that the site is suitable for the type and
proposed density of the development.
4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of
Approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
The project consists of a Tract Map on property designated for Professional Office.
Senior citizen housing is a use consistent with the General Plan and Development
Code for areas designated as Professional Office. As designed and conditioned, the
project is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
8
5. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Fire Prevention Bureau, the
Public Works Department, and the Building and Safety Department. Furthermore,
provisions are made in the General Plan and the Development Code to ensure that the
public health, safety and welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent with these
documents.
6. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The proposed tentative tract map has been designed to provide for future passive or
natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible,
because the construction plans will comply with all applicable building codes and State
energy guidelines.
7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within
the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are
substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided.
All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map.
The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts.
8. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedications requirements
(Quimby).
As conditioned, the subdivision is consistent with the dedication requirement.
Development Plan (17.05.01 O.F)
1. The proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
senior citizen housing within the Professional Office (PO) designation and projects with
High (H) Density Residential use designations within the City of Temecula's General
Plan and Development Code.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and public welfare.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be
consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended
to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
9
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Vicinity Map - Blue Page 11
2. Plan Reductions - Slue Page 12
3. PC Resolution 06-_ - Blue Page 13
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Exhibit S - Mitigation Monitoring Program
4. PC Resolution 06-_ - Slue Page 14
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Exhibit B - Mitigation Monitoring Program
5. Initial Study - Slue Page 15
6. Mitigation Monitoring Program - Slue Page 16
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
10
ATTACHMENT NO.1
VICINITY MAP
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi.FamilylPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
11
~
~
00
~
o
~
'"
"
"
i
/
,,~, /
" '--.'-.~'-L'-c~WY -~ - -_/~--/
!F-'\----~I
/~ \
~
~
.../
/
.../
/~y/
/
N
1.
/
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PLAN REDUCTIONS
G:IPlanning\2005IPA05.0235 Silver Oaks Mul!i-FamilyIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT. doc
12
/
/
~--/
~--,~;::-~ ~~-~=}~=\ - --
"
"
~~~.
~~"
..
II
=,.-
~ Ii -.:--
p
I
"
!,r
ljl
.'
,~
,
_.~
f
,=","~
I
I
r-t'
: II
'I
~
I
I
I
,
.....
,
I
I.
I
i
,
_elL
_m..""....."
,,-........"""""....
,,,.,,...: / rr"""'''''''''''..U''......O'M$l
, 1/1;
'In'! J I """ '" ,
, CONDOMINIUMS! 6 -0'
'I I 2.-" I I I
II l-==7'-O.----\
,- N'!- :<:'r"""",,=.::"<
I
I
\
""
~~.Ii,il
ill 'T !I~II,
.JJ-6!-' 2..0.
~NTRYG~H,,"D5IG'"
III i IT1f'
I n II
III\!!.I II
!"U;I I I
1"f+d<.<H
.I
I~
II ~ 1 ~
I i1d.
i ~ ; ~ t2
;1 ~ j ~!i
~ 1 J!,~
.1 u ~ ~ ~
II ~
I:'
I! z
II 5
it n..
'I' ~
I <<
1f ~
:;: Ll.J
11.1 ~
1'1 a
ill U .
ii' I
Il(~~
I:' I
ill if) 1
Q ~UGG~T~O ~T1<l'1:'T UG1'1T ~"'lJ"'~ I~II ~
U "-LJ'~ ~I)(TU~ ON '0' l"O~ ~ U";A ......c.."'~c"....... "G"'T<~G Ji;1 ""0
'5~e 5tteI!T 2 (A~O Il.f~~ TO ~! PrlOTOMI:'T~IC ,......." ..:::.
rDl 5UG:G~T~D OO~l"'lItO ~,,..ru...~ '" 0
~ )()()(>:~'>:TU~ U::SA"~,,,-reCTuALClGt1nNG ~ll Zg
~ft ~"cn 2 (ALSO~" TO C:~ l''''OtOM~Rl(. ~U>>< ~
ni, ,..::;.;::_ Il:1 ~
01; ~n I -rf~"~ \:1 ~
Q87S0~~ I ,I U3
025...J44Jlfi\lldf05000 1\
6' 2'459 I ,J
'~:::' ..:::.:~.: ii~' ~M
I nF"~._"~"--~ : +-:::::::n..~_ . ,,,.
I ~ i _...:~ iqj~lllml::IIHI I_~:;-' ~ ::.-~:: :.. HO
~- O~:l-' ",,- .. 1/r-""'" ._. J\ ~~,=.:"H'
MAI'-IOOXO<JO.'3><'
><-",."."." .~,,,,,",,
T R1 1 L1 G 1 N 0
~ eO'1""C/olr<l>l!
~ WDfr01~OiI'Ol'lAl<M
o~Y'i:~
* WCI.I.mIl~1llO)l';
6'- ~~~
o
o~
o
o~
.
~-
"'~
~
~
r.<:l~rm
,.,;rr.OOSW!
~~~.& IIDH<,;I/IICIlO.Im...m~
~"!Q< . .....ottWMJ/fAY~
<.!'!IOI I ~Ot;"""
U!llI. '\Il.KlR""""'AY~
,,,00>: " .....owGr.WlGAA/l~~
.Well' I IiOT!COOl'W<
,,'fI(Il l. ....:..;tyJ(T0lD"""
14'IlO:l ,7..ftmIl,5T1U1"!Jtt:j
~lGW
1<f.l1AAlJ~1f,\U,OIi
~r"-"'ClMfA
~~,,",,01~
~~5
--
""""""""",,,0
"'~I\ClI~
--=
~=-
~L';WIP~"!
>aml""'(
~M
GUffi<~_
2."f'OX
""'-'C>\WMWAYTnei
lli:OUCt<
1"00>:
,,~
l~' 00;t
Illll;IfJ,~>lG1JU5
., mrm/tlJltl,llO,l.1Uli.lM5
& MRll/h"'lt(.l,n:;"l$!Ar;.u.15
"
~fOI&'.~unIl<
C<lJl'OIO<iA,,..'......
NOTt; AU fXl5TI~G mE> ON SITE TO ll~ RfMovED
lAN05CAPING 5HAll BE IN5TAlillJ AND MNNTANEDTO IN5URE THAT PlJ\NTINGSV.111 NOT
INTfR.FeREWffHUTIUTTE5STf,fITUGHTlNG,ADJACENJ5trern.5TING"1Rlh..'\U!'SSI>MO
N.LTRAFflC5IGHTLJNES.'
CITY TRfE SIZE CALCULATION
O!OJ\UIJ~re
,.':!IOl'.20'10T(J1'l.
wrox.3O'IofOT"-
"G'l..5CPOTOT",-
=~
.u1lO:l a~.J ,.,'OT>;.
w~,O':'\'~~~ 11"<1)1",-
l"OCJx. arr '0. ~I~ lO''''-
'5....... .00_." .;~TDT"'-
BENe" NOTES.
,,,,,,",'0'",,,-
~~~
""'~
OO~"
~,-
O~w;'(IJIl#.<I>l<>\~'~
C(lHCW'(COWI'..~w.oo.c.JilJ,rm
t<<)N.CONCorTl'all.~._
::<J,c<.Qm
'D<HJ..<!:~'_rc-"'51
C(lHCRI'1'CllJ1',l"1~(f:u:-.c.l'"'r<!l
""~COl=__
"'OTE S~~ MAI~R.iAJ.5 oom fOR fICTUR.E5
NOTE
WlD5OJ"1t.1G51'1AU.!l~IN5TAL:lDANDMAlNTAJNEDTOIN5URfTHATI"lANTING5WlllIlO1
I~m~ WfTn LlTlllT1ES.5Tltm LJGHTIN.G. A!})V,.eI.:r 5('::( O'JST(~fu :,T~llO'VI'5 AAO
'U TlWFlC5IGtfTUt;E5
""
A lAND5CNt MAINTeNANCE PRDGR)M 5MAJl. ~ suwrmo fOR. I>f'Pfl!N1>J.. WI!"H ,ME
lAAD?CAf'E CONSTR.LJcnON PlANS. W11ICH DnAJI.5T1i~ f'ROf'(R w.1'lTeN.I.N(~ OF
PWI'OSEDPl.AflTMATERlAJ.5T0A55URtPWI'l:RG~'TMAHD'...,vIOSCAfE
DE\lc]..oPMENTm!1.Tl'IELON(;.1tI'.MI5\t\[\IC':IOfil'tMtQ!'[R\l_~\'1~I'1<OJtl\
MAlN11NANCl: PfI..OGR./IM 5HAU El{' pWVIOW TO Tl1f lAN~ CONlIUOOP. v.tl(J
SHALL B~ F.Eif'ONSIBLE TO CARFYOU, THE DETAILED f~"'GW.~
"
i~
\
,.
:\
i .1':___
~I._/
:.J
~- --.-'--'-
5UGGe.r~DLtG"T~"ml~
..
'i"'-'~""""'"
45~'~~~
~
..
- ~ <:.> v::-
"
R 5UGGt~T~D :;.TRttT vG"T ~I~,U"Z
U "-'.1'5 I'I>:Tu..e 0,. I ". "OL~ By U"'... ..I>..C"'T~CTUAL l-,,,-,,T'NG
ffi]
~V<;G~T~DeOL>AR;OI'I>:'TURl'
c~.,. ~,)(Tul'-" l.'Y"ADGO
I
.J
'~j
_/
._.L-___
PLANTING LEGEND
- ..... fIOT"",r....__ ~- ~ m ~
-
~ ~~ -~ ,- ", '"
- ~~~. [l,i,T'JlY ,- t,''-; ,~'Ct~
.. --- ~ ,,- ,," ""'
- -~ tl<;l>Wl"''''''' IO><WN ,W ,,,'CC T~""'''''''''''
0 .--, I!lDrr"'l:llt<>. ,~> '" 5I'Kmi".r/'''''''
- 1'1Tf0Sl'0bM' ".1I'!1.R5[N1J#' "",.p~ \~""-O'< ,~ ~'".C
- """""''''''' ..""'''''1o'frO:>< ,~> ,"' ~'C C
- ~rMorno'<<lll ~ ,(i'U,," - Zo"we
G ~COl<Ceru~ -~~ ,~~ ., "0.'
I2lZJ ""'"""""'..,...,
""e:-,c~t~
~~~
.. ~~>>.<>'tll:>1'~~ omJm.~ ~~,.
~O9"'OlO; ~~""" ~.. ~.... 1<"O,C
101IeUSllJTD\fI<I;J01\NI!....I'l:~'mn91f""'/""'.,~
......._:J'&O~ ~"-~,~ ",'~
TOlll'LJS/t"O"""..M"'."-ItIltRJ""SlI!:......'TIl<G~
~Q';e
~1W;",T\/oU.e'C 1l'(J,lIll.IDmDM,o,m,AAlfD10IN:olJRE THAT PLAN11J.lGS'MLL Nor
Itll!mFJ' 'MTl1lfTIUTlfS. STRUT LIGHTING. !<OJA.UIlT SITE fX15TING 5rR.UaURES AND
All TR,OJ'FIGSIGtlTUNES.
NOTf
A lJ,NDSCA/'E MAINTENANCE noG/UIM SI1Al1 & SUBMlmD fO~ mW'lAL WlTH THE
lM05CAPE CCI'5TRUCTION f'lAN5" 'M1IGI1 OClAll..5 TlIf. f'fJJl:'ER M<\lf{(t1>lAla Of
P~Of05ED!'!.ANT w.rmA15 TO A,55Ui! PWPE>:. GROWl'll AND LAND5CAPE
Dr<noPM~NT I'OR T11~ l.ONb-ITRM fSTI1ETIC5 Of rH~ PI(CftI(TY T11E Al'f'RO\'W
MAll4llNANCErRDGR.OMSHAllElEPROVIOEDTOTl1tlANOSCAI'ECONTRACT(\R'M10
:,\i/lll M ilJ3r0l61eillO umOl.1TiliE DfTAI1I-C PROGRAM
i
j
,1'''_[
l!il'II['"
II
!;
II
11111
I!I' III --
II"'"'' "~'-
Ii - I
!l "j i I
I~ 1 l;: ~,
:11 }j; li~ \
IZ .." ~ u ~
11 j J"~
,I v ,,,
I!i,~
li-
I!I
III
JI
11
III
~I
,;
I"
itl
Ii!
Ii!
II,
I~I
I'
I~I
:1
ill
1'1
l
I'
I{\
11d"-
I,J""".
Ii,. ,.. ,.,.
I! D",,&,"" [.1.........
c""".","", Dol.,..."
z
S
~
ro
=>
~
or
~
~
~
=>
~
~
w
co
z
o
co
Ul
2
:::0
Z
~
o
o
z
o
u
'"
<(
o
a:
w
::J
(Jj
..
_;00."
..
:=r.
-_.
. -...-... ~__YOII_"__
, .......... ..........._"".,----
, -_. .......--..-
-- ..---
-_.
aTT~lII!~
-_. -. -,
-~~ ~
-_. -- -
-.... ... :
-
-
- ~
.
--
.o.
:
_M_
'.... ---
-~.. -
-- -...-.-........,
-- -......
..---
-..
--
--
"....
- -
:.=...
--
::
-
"
..
.,
..
..
-_.
-_.
--
--
:-
--.
-_.
-_.
-_.
L
---
~
-
"'-
-
-
,
-
...
....-.-
!_"~h _T_
--
~~.. ...
~k-.~ . T
_H
T
._..-1:~f
-.
,,-
-'0<:
". ,..,
-I' .a ;:- t
- _.--~J ~
-""
-.......
...",.-
Mi':'::~
. :r~"-
.... --.-.--...-
~, - --.......
--................-
. ---
.. ---...
. -----
r? ---'-
E :"-.CII;O_'-::"'l
..... -..--
... -~--
-
--
-----",...-
====m..~~"::."---- t
--.. --....-.
=.=-- --..-..-.
---- --..-..-..-..-...-
\
I I
I liB
../
_.- .
i
.0:
:J
I'
IICHA I"
~,
!r= I
; i:j -~I
! ~ d...
!~.- ~ ~ ' ~:;\ I -r
. \ i I I I '
~ >>t I I
lU~!,
-1-
.. .\6
"... ,r-
'" 0 }.,~ ~lT'
A'P- "
.v
'.' ~"I! I
.~ 4: .\ ~I
tJ;I~1
l rJ ~
'-- .J"
i'1
'f,
/J.7k////;;}1i~~:~~'- ,'- -- ,'-, ;",,'
" _"~_~"../r!:.. _.
-_._~
1Il.:i--- .... _
I
I
~
.'
"-",, .... v ..
.." 'n'. ----; --",-:-:.. L----: . _J.. '; ~ -:7'_;~---:_ . _ :::~_\\~~ r-<<t:
__ III .1 _ ' ",
-=. ;..-Tfi(fMARK-eoM~ - = ~ ::.
~.........._, -...... '- ...:."i;:ai~:r",,:~v.' ::---...... ......... :-.. ........ - -3-'=- ~ .--'--=-
------
NNIliWITA ROAD
BrfWCB) a,aA1Dl
DNlTa.O ROAD
ENWaD B..EYATICJt
~
rrr--t
..... ...
..
2JIQ.FI'. ca...
I.EIllI:TO~'EtIIBNlt.
_0-."""""
\...:-
---
lIt. .'
. .
. ..
-
IlET'AL fBCI B.lYA1'1CIN1_.H" I
rr:.'.---
.:. .'~""~;,...,~ -
--1-1
INIII'/' 110\,. ANI _
~
7- r jIWllllllllll1~:- ~ I ~--
n- ~ .-- 'If,:!
-=:&- -- ,~ ..-<
.
:='--1--1
WM.__
I!UVATICNI
TRUMARK COMP ANtES
~""""'I~.. ,.'
_r _PNKWAY IIlU11I
UICI~.CA _
~.
--.
1'L..N421 TWOIII!DIIODM.TWOMlH-".
I'LN4 41 TWO IB*KIW. ~ TWO lATH -IAIO.
..xlfrG PI.OClR '"' IGI' ~ TO. NW'TMU.
P81mc1lOMJ&......,,,.., , .
. .. 1 '
I'LClOIII'LAHI
.-.
TRUMARK COMPANIES
,.. _.~.., CIGfrI)O'I
_, _._AY IClU11I
ua~,CA_
~.
i
~
~
~.
, .. .
fLOClO ........
---.
.......
on-
fZ"=
--
Nt'
-~ ;-..;~--~]
b ___.1
<<<r
......
""'"'-
<<<r
-
I
-, I
(11
C . .~ .
~-
IC~m,-
-.-..---1
In r
tfo<rf
~
P1...AN1 TWO~TWOlAnl"MIO.
f
.
U-<T
1M"
..
. VMr _ ...... ~,
1 1
l' . .
fW='l? t ...
,
r
.. .c r1
~gl T
~ .-
~
~
~
~
TRUMARK COMPANIES
... --........... .." ..,
:le44711ANCHO 'NlCWAT -
~~.CA_
-,
-..
~
h
-
'"'I
~ ~
-
i
--
/11
: 1
________11
... "-
[/
r.
(C J- -.rt:
t
--
-
......
..."..
.....
U-<T
.'
ruM f TWO 1II8XItlI+ DBt. TWO lATH.......
ecotG P\.OOIlNT tI71i""'" TO II: NJWTMU
t8!lWCIOW&_.u io,... .
,
~.
...... ...... ...... ..... ..... .....
1 1 -J
0- If I l ~ I ~ ~ C' '~ ~
"
r- -1 - ..-..'- i;
- !
I .: ...
. r
- i .~
- - r
. - .
~ .
r
~ ~jOl
- -I
~ ( ~ t
~ ~ I r.H
~T' i -
- h"
r r -
I I
f...----- --
... -------l- . -,
L . .. ~ ~ ! ~
'NY"
l.Lr..1f -t~' . Gi!
.
tH"
M'-<l'"
<<Hr
'?"""'-.~.
......
JO'<T
~
...... .......
't
-'
~ MD. I TWO IIElIOCI.C, TWO 1.\111-1210.
PUNNQ,.8 TWO~+UlKTWON1H-ueo.
e::at) IlI.Ola lIlT JG1r...... TO. N>>I'T~
PIIIWC......."..A.I.,., ..
, ~. i
FLOOII .ute
TRUMARK COMP AHlES
"~'''''I''.. ,.'J
_, _ '_AY IlIUIIl
UI<I..-r. CA_
':=~
~lIiIiOIlI
Mi.iiie..
,
la
al
,
la _
al
Ia
I
;Ln~n
r '}n
la
,
, ~J
,
~ ~Em3
-1IOlIl..... IIOlIl .....
.....,...... .....,......
..
... ~ ...
........ ....... ....... ....... ........
1W01IIIIIOCIW.~ TWOIII!DIIOCIW+DIII TWO III*XlW + DIll TWO~.1lI!H TWO II!IlIlClOW +D8(
TWO IA'" TWO IA'" TWO IA'" TWO IA'" TWO IA'"
-... -... """... """... -...
....... , ......1. PL.OOII
1013 lOX IHOWN ON 11ft: PUN ... DIG D
N:) DftT ITNa'ftlIII!Il::UB
n~n
1
~r= l
.......
TWO_
TWO IA'"
-...
....... .
TWO_
TWO IA'"
-...
.......
TWO_
TWO IA'"
-...
..-r I'UlCIIl
..1LIlMI A
'\ ~JI----I::l""
. '. !
"~
~1
~
.......
twO IKIIW)QW + DIN
TWO IA'"
-...
,... . . PL.OCII
I'll DNa A
,
.
,
I'UlOlI PUNa
l'
.....
,......
r-
......,
TWO_
TWO IA'"
lIlT".
......,
TWO_
TWO IA'"
121T...
........
TWO_
TWO IA'"
-...
..-r IUICIlI
".f'IIWI!IID
II'6.ii:.
TRUMARK COMPANIES
~_....~... ..,1
_r IWDIO ,/lllCWAY IClUTH
UICI_.CA _
-.
".....
3lH'lI!liI
~D _ Di
I I
n
r~n
~ -
aj
ID
- al
n",n
r "
';l
I
[c dFtrJ-'
--
-,-.
i-
~1
-l
~
........
..... .......
.......",
-...
,......,
.....-
.......",
""...
.........
.....-
.......",
-...
........ .
.....-
.......",
-...
.......,
.....-
.......",
""...
.......,
.....-
.......",
arr ...
_ PLOllII
..._~.
_ PLOllII
...~ C
._-
-,-.
~=
~
........
TWO ..... . ..
.......",
-...
........
TWO -..oow + DEN
.......",
1727...
........
TWO~.DEN
.......",
WI".
........
TWOIIIItOClW+ DIN
.......",
_11.
........
TWO IB*:JC:N . DIN
.......",
112111.
........
TWOIIIIIW:lOW. DIN
.......",
1121...
......~
... o--q.
'... .JIIl..OCIa
,.. DIMla C
.
.
.
"'001I PLANI
TRUMARK COMP AHlES
~ _.......... OCIICIO'I
_r _._AYIOUIH
UICII_.CA _
~.
_i&:.
... ... It
...~ .
. . r
.
"""" .......
~~Vl
K/ ~
'ro ~~.
J!/~~~ "1, ~t ~
11.....-
:/
6
,Ii--;--R'/ VII
L..L..J ,.
..~D
,
-~
-"-~~~' ~\~
~-
NOTES< 1'._ C
ALL MECHANCAL EQUIPMENT TO BE
LOCATED ON THE GAOUM> AIoI) SCllEEIEO
_is&.
TRUMARK COMPANIES
... _,-..,., .. I. .
a441' IWGIO PIIIICWAY IClUIH
~. .,CA_
~.
CD~
-
CIfI1'IaNA _.
--
--..
...
(!) ~...r
--
CD ~Lr-
--
--
---
....
==.,-
--
CD L==~ ~';.=-....
CD 1'P___ G:l:_
JZiNNiiicii- CMfAWAY
CD EI:.- ......
,
!UVATIONI
-..
~
~
85
I&\IIILIVA11CltI
__A
,
~
'~
IRAIIILIYAT1C>>t
--"
~
--
,
aullLIVATION
__D
TRUMARK COMP AHlES
~_I---I"". ,.'
_r_r_ATanH
UICI-... CA__
CD
CD
CD
CD
'::=~
~.....
--,......
GI"'IlIlM-' CI"TlDIt.
<D =-
-
DO
-~
...
~1Mf""
...
<D ="'-='
..-
(3) :lY1iir
..-
i\L.ca1.r-
-......
~---
(3) ==It::'
--
CD r-,~~ !'2!....,.
~ CUTAWAT
CD ~~rrocu:a
& nlEEf ILE.'tA1'Ol FCIIIttWCED EN) INT El..a'A1'Ol
-
l.NTI , & .
DO B.EVATICIH
l.NT82&.4
IEN) B.lVA11ClN
T
ILIVATIONI
...
,
2
~
(1)
AICH'I' ILIYA11ClM
..........A
.----<J) r-<D
~ .
(])
~
(1)
CD
~
TRUMARK COMP AHlES
":5!~
""""""1fIiII
.. ..........." ... - ..,
...1 IWCIIO PIiMWAY IllImt
UICI~. CA'"
~
il--
. 1'<1" ~
I'Ut.\.tMn:
1
,
...... L
toIOX lOX IHOWN CI( 8n I"LAN
IC) DIY nNVI'D1IEIUII!D
,
"'"""" PLANS
-=-
POC1.
\IlOtr:lFr.
'lfu.
",,--...-l.fT
.' '.
, a I'
, .
'\ ,.
. --
II ,..z.=== I
,,,. '. ,..........1 _.-w.::,,g,,,,;;,
" ,
· ,..... -1L l
11 ,....=.. f1 C FIE . J
.= ,r '''====1: C .:II ~
~- __ ,.i:::::t l'-~-~"" ~ ii : ~,' -',
III ;;p- ---. "4r .....4: IZ'l \ ' [;JLf '
" ,.~ .....0;:, -. _~o -'!!.l"
"""" .>11- ......jj. ,I - i _ u _
, .... 0
.".".
'>>'<I"
/,';:7~ IW=~
JDDD
,
,="iF :======\i
""*.._---~
"",,1"= :=====::11
11 If
'=1:= :====='1:
...::11:. :=====::11
II II
-~
IJ JIVI
:~
,
"""""""
.tJ I~
,
WI
1;1:' II 11
~ II II II
..,.
u
TRUMARK COMPANIES
".-........." ,.'
_7 _ '_AY.ount
ug~.CA_
10'0'"
.......
..
......
i
;3
.
-
:L.I
o
:r-t
~.
.
~
~
~
~
r-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
''''::\F=''''=''"'''=:ii I
=(1======(1,------------_. I
..d.======d' I i I
II II
'''''1~'''ucu~: I I
'=~j====="'==j: I 1'-0" I
':::l~F======"l:, t I
'=1l=======4: I
.=01===0:===011 I
II II
. n Ii n=:l_'======="l~
~=~'f'~ _1' 0
II :: I:!H ~
II 11 11'M
~ :: ~ 1: ~
r:>lt~=~=fj <J 4.- c
II U U ~..~~..."'.......,
II II
,.."".."".......0:11
II If
,"'a..........lIlt
::~t::::::~1 \ M
,.~~..........~: I
II II I
,..:zll::z=..==",..dl ~
(7 ~ L___: .A .5l4 n_.J
,.+......~., k - ~ \J
i
~
j---_.....
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
"""'......
TRUMARK COMP ANIES
". .' . ,.. ..'
_r_rNICWAYIllUIlt
LAICI~. CA_
_=.
i I
~ I
~.
........
CD=-
-
(j) .-1
0~
(j) &IF'
(j)~
a> -=---
..... t
.....~'TlClMI
_az.
-
.
~
.
- .......~,.,..
-
~_......~,.,..
1
-
-
-
. -
TRUMARK COMP ANtES
Ata....,_i.~~""
....,. ~ pllfCWAT ioU'lM
UI<I~' CA IiIIIIl
-<D
-<D
I~U"""'U""~
~
.
~-<D
o
.
-<D
.
~.
-
--
-
'1
'------
-
,
--
-
...
-L
-
---
,-- --W'lN
t __~___
-----
---111:1
:1::=/-
_____If ___
-... -......---
--===---::u--
-=aJWlt.f--
.. ~~==r-:"
.------
..~-...-r..-
a ...~.-.--..-_
.. ...._..___r__
..--....
----...
.--.--.....
.. _..l_,r_"'._lIiI.t_~
lit .., .. .__
.,=--....,_..r..~_.
-,.,
.--
- ...
- -.
. -----.--
& -11I-".-
. ___..11
. --------
.. .........---.-.
__.._._ilIlIt
~J'IIACI'M1_'
..-..,.. 1-
---- -.--
- -. ..-
-- -.--
,-
, ....._.JIIII
-, -
,.-
~.;..,_...!lI
_1_"--'__.----
aw=S;!i!l~:::
oa__"._
ftfi:::._
.-1_-"-..-
rr
air
:::
!5!!. ....
.':1
--
~"I"I
--
-
..~
......-
lrlf?dlW~~[f{1~
CONCEPTUAL GRADING
FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 33891
C~~ of l~moolllllS.\p COllllrn~ <<JJ~ 1R~'\#~r~nd~,
Sitalft~ iQl~ CSl~n~tOJmntal
__________________...c.:::.."'::_
-
.....
,
~~~
..FF-1CB1.80 ~1IIf_
:-~~ i;~ ~~~I~ ~r-f :~--
...,...,. ..../
~.~ == -~
~...
-
._ _i
(~. "'I u j-~
= go 'I: = _-"- = M ~
- ----
_A""'"
1UF-r ---
- -
! T
~Q.-.. ~ :l.= ~~
........... .. ..1l'A.........,
W1llW'~_..-
-.. IrYfW__'--'
.n
- -
..... ~
'~._.- ~-- _1~=:;4-:
""""""..,..,
...,..trA.ZDtoMlD1lO~-.....m
7r.~...---
._~ .. f ~f-
-W<'l_ ~ l__~___,~
!
j
I
I
i
l
I
.--n."O"""P'
-~_.-
~ -.-. --.. .--- e _w ... C1Y OP 'I1IMIlClJI.\
----- ~.. """ '" I HUMAHK. 1 !
go~.U""r"'lS -~-- iil'M'f~..-..._ """""'"""....... 1
~- m. - - Tam.1M:lIWJrllCl._ ~J
..""AD....,.""... Olwal'T.....
-
-
I~
.u=.ll
~..-
.........
-
~
.
,-
-
.- .
--,
a~~
....
.
~y
I
I
I
.
~T
I
I
I
I
.
_T
I
I
I
,
-...
,
,
.
~.
~..
r =i- 'f
~l/i"~" I
-- -;.~
""ftlft
~ ,
, -
r r.ll_ T
."._ ~Ir'''' I
- ...... ----i
sa
-'&8
lev
--"'\.I~
I~~.."..~'"...~
-:c
~.
"
7'f!:
i'''''
:
. :--~1."~"::-;-'-""':'~'~"~-nl;,.ti. ", .\~~~;:"lJ;:::_,..':.+,
t.;.
i'"
"-
t.\.
.' '1
~ i ,a
J.~~
"I"l"" ~ I; ..
.i','l' -I
t ,~
~4--
tllJI, C___ -
I T ~ r: -- --.-
t I "'" L...-.
It! I 11""""-'
,J,
", ~,
"',.","
-- .......,.., ....- ~ --.-._---- e -... .... ~p~
- -I :4 ----.. _n......_ ... IfUIMAHK.
-~-
- . . IIDN.UL.:I"". iiioii!'I' ..... - _" ,uS' ,UALGAADI<<I
..- j ~. - - _ tINIMM"IIWII'la.-.
.."'....... "V"~ QfvalT.....
,
,
,
!
I
!
I
i
I
2
.\
l
,
.
i
,
,
1!.... I
_Ca.ru:lH~
'.
--
""=rMu...~.....
._anT.~"". ., , ""."'.JS.LIl
TENT A TI VE
TRACT NO. 33891
.. ,. " " ....-
~
.i.iC~_
!
I
i
r
'I ''',I
, '
I,;',
~....
I<<i"~
~_.OJ_-==::.&S::
t..::--.._~, '""-::"-
....N._..........._
-
- .,.
r I
~=~~=j:~~~--~
-
.. -----
..-----
"---z:~
",._,-.
~-.
"---..-"
a. ___ __....___
.. --_..~.._.
-
'" _,__..~__.
--
.--....-.. -
T~.. -- I. ~
~~!L ~:IQIO_ ~~
-*-" .,.....-.-
--p.-"
.. ~~.I!..~--==
:;::::=--._~
a.______
.. "_____."'_..1_
....:=='-==.--....-....--
.. ----------
.. W& _-..
....---...
..-----.....
:: :..-:.-:------..:::..---
..--...-
:'="---.-.
---
- -.
--.
.. -----.--
..-..-.--
..-..-.-..
: :.=-~~.::.::::.._..
-- .,. ...
-
-~_. 'I"
:"._-_~ -- i_ _ -- :
-..:..:....==- :=4
---:.r-.....
" ,,/
T. r:Jr-
'-j[j - I ~
,-
.............,.,.
---..r"-
\ : /
,:r
'/W
'!INrA_1IUot'!'r~.....
__.. 1_
- ,-
----: ::=:.-
&-. " I .,.." _-.__ ___
--'-:.t.~'_.iii.JiiiiiIL""._
:~'...;-=-1_'.iiiliIi.-'" _.
-_. --,
--,-
'--
=-~~'I..
:-=..:..-:. ~l__ i
I
TENTATIVE lRACT N). 33881 I
..., t. 1 11m'
~............'.....D".'...."......,..""T"'..f
D555N!l1lO.W:l.8JlEAIlO I
... 1BECU..A,CALJ"Il:lItM~
CONSULTING ~. FAX-.e7&1MD. =232 .!
....., 11. ...
-"
-.--.:- ---
...........-
=:.~
___ft- 0
~-
:::-L__'...._
R..-.w&..amM" M"-_
---"'-I
I!!ftl._
..----
~-_._-
~"'I_-.==:"'''.'l~'t
.". ,..-....
---1
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
13
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0236, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33891 TO
CREATE ONE LOT FOR CONDO PURPOSES ON 7.5 ACRES
TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
MARGARITA ROAD AND DARTOLO ROAD
Section 1. Vicki Mata, representing Trumark Companies filed Planning Application
No. PA05-0236 on August 9, 2005, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General
Plan and Development Code.
Section 2. Planning Application No. PA05-0236 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA05-0236 on May 17, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter.
Section 4. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission's Hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission denied Planning Application No.
PA05-0236 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
Section 5.
All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 6. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 16.09.140.0 of the Temecula Municipal
Code.
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision
are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal
Code;
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that Tentative Tract Map No. 33891 is
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the Municipal Code because
the project meets design standards as required in the Development Code, General Plan,
and the Municipal Code.
B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract
entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a
Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be
too small to sustain agricultural use;
The proposed land division is not land designated for conservation or agricultural use.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TIM\Planning\Drafl Resolution.docl
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the Tentative Map;
The project consists of a Tract Map for condominium purposes on property designated
as Professional Office. Senior citizen housing is a use consistent with the General Plan
and Development Code for areas designated as Professional Office. The proposed
tentative tract map conforms to the proposed Development Plan (PA05-0235) for
residential condominium units. The Development Plan must be approved prior to
recordation of the final map, thereby ensuring that the site is suitable for the type and
proposed density of the development.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
The project consists of a Tract Map on property designated for Professional Office.
Senior citizen housing is a use consistent with the General Plan and Development Code
for areas designated as Professional Office. As designed and conditioned, the project is
not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems;
The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Fire Prevention Bureau, the
Public Works Department, and the Building and Safety Department. Furthermore,
provisions are made in the General Plan and the Development Code to ensure that the
public health, safety and welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent with these
documents.
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible;
The proposed Tentative Tract Map has been designed to provide for future passive or
natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible,
because the construction plans will comply with all applicable building codes and State
energy guidelines.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially
equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided;
All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map.
The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts.
H.
(Quimby);
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedications requirements
As conditioned, the subdivision is consistent with the dedication requirement.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TIM\Planning\Draft Resolutioo.doc2
Section 7. Environmental Compliance. Adopt a Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program based on the Initial Study for Planning Application No. PA05-
0236, which was prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072.
Section 8. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves
the Application PA05-0236, all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific
conditions set forth on Exhibit A and B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TfM\Planning\Draft Resolution.doc3
Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 17th day of May 2006.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) 55
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the
following vote of the Commission:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
AYES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\1005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TIM\Planning\Draft Resolution.doc4
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TIM\Planning\Draft Resolution.docS
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA05-0236
Project Description:
A Tentative Tract Map to create one lot for condo
purposes on 7.5 acres for the construction of 110 age-
restricted condo units to be located at the northwest
corner of Margarita Road and Dartolo Road
Assessor's Parcel No.:
959-080-011, 959-080-012, 959-080-013
MSHCP Category:
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Residential
Residential - Attached
Residential - Multi-Family
Tentative Tract No.:
TM 33891
Approval Date:
May 17, 2006
Expiration Date:
May 17, 2008
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three
Hundred Fourteen Dollars ($1,314.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and
Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the
Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources
Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-
hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check
as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
1
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
2
Planning Department
2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
3. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City
Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
4. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
5. If phasing is proposed, a ,ohasina olan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning
Director.
6. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program (Exhibit B).
7. A Homeowners Association may not be terminated without prior City approval.
Public Works Department
8. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and
their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
9. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department
of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained
road right-of way.
10. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
11. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for
consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and
shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
12. The proposed access on Margarita Road shall be restricted to a right in/right out movement.
G:\PJanning\2005\PAOS-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft CQA.doc
3
Fire Prevention
All previous existing conditions for this project, Specific Plan, or Development Agreement will remain
in full force and effect unless superceded by more stringent requirements here.
13. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
14. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division
per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water
system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour
duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect
changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all
information as provided (CFC 903.2, Appendix III.A).
15. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade
of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
16. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC 902.4).
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
4
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP
G:\Planning\200S\PAOS-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
5
Planning Department
17. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division:
a. A copy of the Final Map.
b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes:
i. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All
proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655.
ii. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project and is on file
at the City of Temecula Planning Department.
iii. This project is within a liquefaction hazard zone.
iv. This project is within a Subsidence Zone.
c. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's):
i. CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open
space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings
and all landscaped and open areas including parkways.
ii. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense.
iii. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Planning
Director, City Engineer and the City Attorney and shall include such
provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem
necessary to protect the interests of the City and it's residents.
iv. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works
Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with
the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
v. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage
and facilities.
vi. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and
maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
vii. The CC&R's shall provide that the association may not be terminated without
prior City approval.
viii. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand
and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the
owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or
the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the
City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed.
ix. Every owner of a suite or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or
lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2)
a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning
the common areas and facilities.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
6
x. All open areas and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the
association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this
maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning and Public Works
Department prior to the issuance of building permits.
xi. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking
areas shall be provided by the CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded
concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no
map is involved.
18. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property
owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties
individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the
common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be
sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to
maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall
operate under recorded CC&R's, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners
of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance,
repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions
required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with
this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
19. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
Public Works Department
20. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
d. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
e. Planning Department
f. Department of Public Works
g. Riverside County Health Department
h. Adelphia
i. Community Services District
j. Verizon
k. Southern California Edison Company
I. Southern California Gas Company
21. The Developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following public improvements
to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works:
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
7
a. Improve Margarita Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include
installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk,
street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including but not
limited to water and sewer).
i. Modification to the raised landscaped median on Margarita Road to control
the right-in/right-out movement.
b. The developer shall record a written offer to dedicate 12 additional feet of along the
property frontage on Margarita Road.
c. Improve Dartolo Road (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to include
installation of half-width street improvements plus six feet, paving, curb and gutter,
sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including
but not limited to water and sewer).
d. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement
transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
22. The developer shall record a written offer to dedicate 12 additional feet of along the property
frontage on Margarita Road. In order to accommodate the dedication of 12 feet of additional
right of way, and in reliance upon the dedication, the City approves thirty-seven percent
(37%) lot coverage for the project.
23. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of
the street improvement plans:
a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum
over A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard No. 207 A
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400
and 401.
e. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the
project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties.
f. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
g. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
h. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
i. All utilities, existing or proposed, except electrical lines rated 34kv or greater, shall be
installed underground in accordance with Ordinance 04-02 (Section 15.04.090 of the
Temecula Municipal Code).
j. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless
otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of
private streets:
G:\Planning\2005\?A05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
8
i. Improve Streets "A" and "F" (Private Street - 32' RlE) to include installation of
full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage
facilities, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
24. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed bya registered Civil Engineer and
reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other
disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
25. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Margarita Road on the Final Map with the
exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map.
26. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Dartolo Road on the Final Map with the
exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map.
27. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities
shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
28. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or
other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department
of Public Works.
29. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an
existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior to City
Council approval of the Final Map, the Developer shall make an application for
reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency.
30. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
31. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Final
Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map.
32. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
33. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for
work within their right-of-way or facilities per letter dated September 22, 2005.
34. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit
shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
35. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated
and noted on the final map.
36. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division
boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and
recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located
outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the
final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept
free of buildings and obstructions."
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
9
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-D236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
10
Planning Department
37.
The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
/
38. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department.
39. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer is required to enter into a Cultural
Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the
treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as
a result of the development of the Project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors.
40. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries),
all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives
of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and
make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation.
41. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and
redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated
monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the
property.
42. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation
and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to
be compensated by the developer.
43. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all
archaeological artifacts that are found on the Project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper
treatment and disposition.
44. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.
45. A landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved for the landscaping of all areas within the
R-O-W of Margarita Road and Dartolo Road that is proposed.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-G236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
11
Public Works Department
46. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of
Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
47. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading,
Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's
standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
48. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number
(WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of
construction activities.
49. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
12
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
13
Public Works Department
50. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, Final Map 33891 shall be approved and
recorded.
51. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
52. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the
approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and
accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
53. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the T emecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
54. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Fire Prevention
55. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2). This will include all internal roads,
connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access must be in
and available prior to and during ALL construction.
56. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
57. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet
(CFC sec 902 and Ord 99-14).
58. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord 99-14).
59. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4).
60. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks ITM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
14
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1).
61. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC 902.4).
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
15
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Sliver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
16
Public Works Department
62. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP
have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for
immediate implementation.
Fire Prevention
63. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3).
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 SHver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
17
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
18
64. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's letter dated August 19, 2005, a copy of which is attached.
65. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood
and Water Conservation District letter dated September 19, 2006, a copy of which is
attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft COA.doc
19
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
General Manager-Chief Engineer
1995 MARKET SlREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 9250 I
951.955.1200
951.788.9965 FAX
51180.1
City ofT emecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: ~f1..>A....J-( g.Pr\..-~S
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
SEP 2 2 2005
ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
^""'" 0<;;- o-z.3S
The District does not nonnally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities.
The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood
hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of
specific interest to the District induding District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and
drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master Plan system, and District
Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, infonnation of a general nature is provided.
The qistrid t!as not .rev.iewed the froposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in ~ny way
constitute or Imply Dlstnct approva or endorsement of the proposed project WIth respect to flood hazard, public health
and safety or any other such ISSue:
No comment.
Thi~ project would not be impacted by Disbid Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional Interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on
WTitten request of the City. Facilities must be construded to District standards, and Disbict plan check and
insp~ction will be required for Disbict acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
This p!"oject proposes channets, stonn drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be
conSidered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership Dr sucn raClllues on wnrren request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Disbict standards, and Disbict plan check and inspection Will be
required for Disbict acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
This project is located within the limits of the District's, Area
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; appilcaole rees ~f'UUlii "e paid by cashiers check
or money order only to the FloOd Control District or City pnor to final approval of the project, or in the case of
a _parcel map' or subdiviSion prior t.o recordation of ltle final map. Fees to be paid sh~uld be at the rate in
effect at the time of recordation, or if deferred, at the time of issuance of the adual pennlt.
~ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right
of way or facilities. For further information, contact the District's encroachmenr pennit section at
951.955.1266, ....€'"'~C"'I..-,.. c-~ I..-1,J",:;
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) pennit from the State Water
Resources .Control Board. ~Iearance for grading, recoraation, or other final approval should not be given until the City
has determined that the project has been grantee a permit or IS shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Em~.~~"v, Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require lfie applicant to provide all studies calculations, pians and of her Information required to meel FEMA
requirements, and should further require that ihe applicant obtain a Conditional letter of Map Revision fClOMR) prior
to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a letter of Map Revision (lOMR) prior fo occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 160111603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Ctean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or written correspondence from these agencies indicating
the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be
requirea from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit.
Very truly yours.
~~~
c:
Riverside County Planning Department
Altn: David Mares
t<M
ARTURO DIAZ
Senior Civil Engineer
o /a ---
Date: 7 - 7--t:?":7
(
@
Bancha
later
B03rd ofDirectol"s
Csaba F Ko
Pr..~,dent
Ben R. Drake
Sr. Vice President
Stephen J. Corona
Ralph H. Daily
Lisa D. Herman
John E. Hoagland
Michael R. McMillan
Orfic"r;;
Bl"ian J. Brady
General Manager
Phillip L. Forbes
Direclorof Finl'lnce-Treasur"r
E.P "Bob" l."rnuns
Directof(lfEn...ineering
Perr)' R. Louck
Director of Planning
JeffD. Armstrong
Controller
Linda M. FN"goso
Dtstnct Secretary/Administrati\'e
SelTlces Manager
C. Michael COWE'tt
Best Best & Krieger LLP
Genaal Counsel
-..,
July 12, 2005
Case Planner
City of Temeeula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Offiee Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
JUL 1 5 Z005
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
TRACT NO. 33891
APN 959-080-011, APN 959-080-012 AND APN 959-080-013
[TRUMARK COMPANIES]
To Whom It May Concern:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner and the construction of all required on-
site and/or off-site water facilities.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, ifany, to RCWD.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900.
Sincerely,
~ ~IA WATER DISTRlCT
~,.....Michacl G. Meyerpeter, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
05/MM:SB:lm066/FO 12- T6/FCF
c:
Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
~(ot
A"~ ~c:r~;',"";",^
7/1@ ~:;~~~,'~:~ '.,
Rancho California Water District
4;~l::l!', Win"h,,~t.pr R""cl . P"dOffi,.." Anv QOl7 . T,,,,,,,,,,,,I~ r~l;f,wn;" Q?-',J'lQ.Q017 . iQ"l, )QI:_l':Q,,,, . j;'"y ,ll<;l, "Q>:.,",II':n
EXHIBIT B
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0236 Silver Oaks TTM\Planning\Draft Resolution.doc6
Project Description:
Location:
Applicant:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. PA05-0235, a Development Plan to
construct 110 age-restricted condo units on 7.5 acres and
Planning Application No. PA05-0236, Tentative Tract Map 33891
to create one lot for condo purposes.
The project is located on the northwest corner of Margarita Road
and Dartolo Road in the City of Temecula.
Vicki Mata
Trumark Companies
26447 Rancho Parkway South
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Air Quality
A temporary impact of emissions resulting from project related
construction activities. Emissions will be emitted by construction
equipment and fugitive dust will be generated during construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor
utilize diesel powered equipment that is equipped with a cooled
exhaust gas recirculation system.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor use
aqueous diesel fuel for the. diesel powered equipment that is
operated during the demolition and construction phase.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of on-going field verification and inspections.
On-going during all grading and construction activities
Public Works and Building Department
Air Quality
The project may result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
in of suspended particles for which the project region is non-
attainment under federal and state ambient air quality standards.
Air emissions will be emitted by construction equipment and
fugitive dust will be generated during demolition, site preparation,
and construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor
utilize diesel powered equipment that is equipped with a cooled
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP.doc
1
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
exhaust gas recirculation system during demolition, site
preparation, grading and construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor use
aqueous diesel fuel for the diesel powered equipment that is
operated during the demolition and construction phase.
The project proponent shall require that the construction
contractor limit the application of architectural coatings to 225
gallons per week and/or use zero volatile organic compound
(VOC) paint during construction.
Planning and Building staff will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verifications and
inspections.
On-going during grading and construction activities.
Public Works, Building Department, and Planning Department
Air Quality
A temporary impact resulting from project-related construction
activities may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentration on a temporary basis.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor
utilize diesel powered equipment that is equipped with a cooled
exhaust gas recirculation system during demolition, site
preparation, grading and construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor use
aqueous diesel fuel for the diesel powered equipment that is
operated during the demolition and construction phase.
The project proponent shall require that the construction
contractor limit the application of architectural coatings to 225
gallons per week and/or use zero volatile organic compound
(VOC) paint during construction.
Planning and Building staff will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verifications and
inspections.
On-going during grading and construction activities.
Public Works, Building Department, and Planning Department
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllniUal Study CommentslMMP.doc
2
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Air Quality
A temporary impact of offensive odors and additional dust due to
the operation of heavy equipment during construction phases of
the project.
The project proponent required to provide a water truck to
continuously "water down" the graded areas to reduce the amount
of dust from excavation. During grading activities, the site shall be
watered down no less than three times per day in order to comply
with AQMD Rule 403-Fugitive Dust. In addition, all heavy
equipment must be regularly maintained to reduce emissions.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measure as part of on-going field verification and inspections.
On-going during all grading activities
Building Department and Planning Department
Biological Resources
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native
residents or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites.
Vegetation clearing shall be initiated prior to February 15 or after
August 15. If this is not feasible, all suitable habitats shall be
thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nests by a qualified
biologist no more than 5 days before commencement of any tree
removal,
Planning and Public Works staff will verify compliance with the
above mitigation measure prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Public Works
Biological Resources
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP .doc
3
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
residents or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites.
Vegetation clearing shall be initiated prior to February 15 or after
August 15. If this is not feasible, all suitable habitats shall be
thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nests by a qualified
biologist no more than 5 days before commencement of any tree
removal.
Planning and Public Works staff will verify compliance with the
above mitigation measure prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Public Works
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The project proponent shall prepare an assessment of the
archeological and cultural resources on the project property. The
assessment shall be performed by a qualified archeologist in
conjunction with the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians in order to
determine whether there are cultural resources on the property
and evaluate the significance of any such resource. Any such
testing shall involve the Pechanga Tribe, and all tests to determine
impacts should be completed prior to the issuance of grading
permits.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measure prior to issuance of grading permits
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Planning Department and Public Works
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The project proponent is required to enter into a Treatment
Agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians. This
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multl-Family\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP .doc
4
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural
resources and human remains that may be uncovered during
construction as well as provisions for tribal monitors.
The Developer is responsible for retaining the required personnel
and conducting the required meetings with the Building
Department and with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians in
order to enter into the required Agreement.
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Planning Department, Building Department, and Pechanga Band
of Luiseno Indians
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall
be allowed to monitor all grading, excavating and ground-breaking
activities, including further surveys, to be compensated by the
project proponent. The Pechanga Tribe monitors will have the
authority to temporarily stop and redirect grading activities to
evaluate the significance of any archeological resources
discovered on the property, in conjunction with the archeologist
and the Lead Agency.
The Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians and the Planning
Department shall monitor the above mitigation measure as part of
on-going field verification and inspections
On-going during all grading, excavation, and ground-breaking
activities
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and the Planning Department
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
If human remains are encountered, all activity shall cease and the
County Coroner must be notified immediately. All activity must
cease until the County Coroner has determined the origin and
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamUy\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP.doc
5
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
disposition of said remains. The Coroner shall determine if the
remains are prehistoric, and shall notify the State Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC) if applicable. Further actions shall
be determined by the desires of the Most Likely Descendent
(MLD).
The Planning Department, Building Department, County Coroner,
and the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians shall be notified in the
event of any human remains being discovered on the site.
On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project
Planning Department and Building Department
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The landowner shall agree to relinquish to relinquish ownership of
all cultural resources, including all Luisefio sacred items, burial
goods and all archeological artifacts that are found on the project
site to the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians for proper treatment
and disposition.
The project proponent shall notify the Planning Department and
Building Department in the event any resources are discovered. A
representative from the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians shall
be notified to determine the significance of the discovery.
On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project
Planning Department and Building Department
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
All sacred sites within the project area are to be avoided and
preserved.
The project proponent shall notify the Planning Department and
Building Department in the event any resources and/or human
G:\Planning\200S\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP .doc
6
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
remains are discovered. A representative from the Pechanga
Band of Luiseiio Indians shall be notified to determine the
significance of the discovery.
On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project
Planning Department, Building Department, and Pechanga Band
of Luiseiio Indians
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The project proponent shall develop a Paleontological Resource
Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) in accordance with the
recommendations of the City of Temecula and the County of
Riverside for the excavation phase of the proposed project when
construction excavation reaches depths below five feet. This
project is designed to conform to the agency guidelines for
administration of CEQA and those of the Society of Vertebrate
Paleontology. It includes the following steps:
. A trained paleontological monitor shall be present during
ground-disturbing activities within the project area in
sediments below a depth of five feet that have been
determined likely to contain paleontological resources.
The monitoring for paleontological resources shall be
conducted on a half-time basis. The monitor shall be
empowered to temporarily halt or redirect construction
activities to ensure avoidance of adverse impacts to
paleontological resources. The monitor shall be equipped
to rapidly remove any large fossil specimens encountered
during excavation. During monitoring, samples shall be
collected and processed to recover microvertebrate
fossils. Processing will include wet screen washing and
microscopic examination of the residual materials to
identify small vertebrate remains.
. Upon encountering a large deposit of bone, salvage of all
bone in the area will be conducted with additional field
staff and in accordance with modern paleontological
techniques.
. All fossils collected during the project will be prepared to a
reasonable point of identification. Excess sediment or
matrix will be removed from the specimens to reduce the
bull and cost of storage. Itemized catalogs of all material
G:IPlanningI2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study CommenlslMMP.doc
7
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
collected and identified will be provided to the museum
repository along with the specimens.
. A report documenting the results of the monitoring and
salvage activities and the significance of the fossils will be
prepared.
. All fossils collected during this work, along with the
itemized inventory of these specimens, shall be deposited
in a museum repository for permanent curation and
storage.
If fossils are identified, monitoring shall be increased to full-time.
The project proponent is responsible for retaining the required
personnel and providing an agreement document to the City of
Temecula for review.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent shall submit appropriate soils and geologic
hazard investigation reports, including a cone penetration test to
verify lateral extent of liquefiable zone and total settlement.
The project proponent is responsible for submitting the reports to
the City of T emecula
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanningllnitial Study CommenlslMMP.doc
8
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
The site shall be cleared of all vegetation, trees, structures and
debris. The materials resulting from the clearings and grubbing
operations should be removed from the site. If on-site sewage
disposal systems are presently in operation, septic tanks should
be pimped dry and removed as part of the demolition.
The project proponent is responsible for clearing the site.
Planning and Building staff will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measure prior to the issuance of any earthwork on the
site.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that over-excavation shall
be performed in accordance with the Preliminary Geotechnical
Report.
The project proponent is responsible for providing the required
documents to the City of Temecula. Planning and Building staff
will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure prior to
the issuance of any earthwork on the site.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Planning Department, Public Works, and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that the final bottom
surfaces of all excavations shall be observed and approved by the
project geotechnical consultant prior to placing any fill and/or
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanning\lnitiai Study Comments\MMP.doc
9
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
structures. Based on observations, removal of localized areas
deeper than those documented may be required during grading.
The bottom of the excavations shall be scarified in accordance
with the Preliminary Geotechnical report.
Public Works and the Building Department will verify compliance
with the above mitigation measure as part of field verifications and
inspections prior to the issuance of any earthwork on the site.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Public Works and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose peopie or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that earth materials at the
site shall be excavatable with conventional heavy-duty earth
moving equipment.
The project proponent is responsible for demonstrating the above
mitigation measure.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Public Works and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that during earth
movement activities that they shall adhere to all recommendations
advanced in the relevant soils and geologic hazard investigation
reports approved by the City of Temecula.
The Building Department and Public Works will verify compliance
with the above mitigation measures as part of on-going field
verifications and inspections.
G:IPlanningI2005IPA05-0235 Siiver Oaks Multi-FamllylPJanningllnitial Study CommenlslMMP.doc
10
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Prior to grading plan issuance
Building Department and Public Works
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent shall complete further investigation using
Cone Penetration Tests and Geo Probe Tests to verify the lateral
extent of liquefaction and associated settlement.
The Building Department and Public Works will verify compliance
with the above mitigation measures as part of on-going field
verifications and inspections. The project proponent is
responsible for providing all required documentation.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Building Department, Public Works, Project Proponent
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent shall submit and updated Geotechnical
Analysis to the Planning Department for review.
The project proponent is required to submit the updated
documents.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Project proponent and Planning Department
G:\PlanningI2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnilial Study CommentslMMP.doc
11
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent shall submit a construction related noise
mitigation plan to the City for review and approval. The plan shall
depict the number, types, and location(s) of construction
equipment and how the noise from the equipment will be reduced
during construction of the proposed project.
The project proponent is responsible for submitting all required
documents to the City of Temecula for review and approval
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Building Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent shall demonstrate that during all project site
excavation and grading onsite, the construction contractors shall
equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly
operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufactures'
standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary
construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away
from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities
Building Department
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP .doc
12 .
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent's construction contractor shall locate
equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance
between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive
receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities
Building Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent's construction contractor shall limit all
construction-related activities that would result in high noise levels
according to the construction hours to be determined by the City
staff.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities
Building Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent's construction contractor shall limit haul
truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi.Family\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP.doc
13
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
equipment. To the extent feasible, haul routes shall not pass
sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
Prior to certificate of occupancy issuance
Planning Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent shall be required to build a noise barrier for
the second-floor balcony facing at Unit 53. The barrier shall be at
a height of 5 feet above the finished floor of the balcony. The
barrier may consist of a solid base plus a transparent "plexi-glass"
upper section continuously wrapped around the edge of the deck.
The upper section shall be constructed of 3/8-inch glass or y" inch
thermoplastic.
The Planning Department will verify compliance through
inspections to the site prior to the release of occupancy.
Prior to certificate of occupancy issuance
Planning Department
Noise
Cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project.
The project proponent shall submit an acoustical analysis to
ensure that noise levels will not exceed a CNEL of 70 dBA exterior
and 45 dBA interior. The interior noise analysis shall include
requirements such as air-conditioning and/or mechanical
ventilation system, and sound-rated windows and doors as a
means of achieving compliance for any homes where the future
exterior noise levels are expected to exceed CNEL of 60 dBA.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP .doc
14
Specific Process:
The project proponent is responsible for conducting and
submitting the required analysis to the Planning Departrnent
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to building permit issuance
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Planning Department
G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Mulo-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study CommentslMMP .doc
15
ATTACHMENT NO.4
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
G:\Planning\200SIPAOS-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPianninglPC STAFF REPORTdoc
14
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0235, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT 110
AGE-RESTRICTED UNITS AND A RECREATIONAL FACILITY
ON 7.5 ACRES TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND DARTOLO ROAD
Section 1. Vicki Mata, representing Trumark Companies filed Planning Application
No. PA05-0235 on August 9, 2005, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General
Plan and Development Code.
Section 2. Planning Application No. PA05-0235 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA05-0235 on May 17, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter.
Section 4. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission's Hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission denied Planning Application No.
PA05-0235 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
Section 5.
All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 6. Findinos. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal
Code.
A. The proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City;
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for senior
citizen housing within the Professional Office (PO) designation and projects with High
(H) Density Residential use designations within the City of Temecula's General Plan and
Development Code.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and public welfare;
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure
that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the
public health, safety and welfare.
Section 7. Environmental Comoliance. Adopt a Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Program based on the Initial Study for Planning Application No. PA05-0235, which
was prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft Resolution.docl
Section 8. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves
the Application PA05-0235, all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific
conditions set forth on Exhibit A and B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Muhi-Family\Planning\Drafl Resolution_doc2
Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 17th day of May 2006.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi~Family\Planning\Draft Resolutioo.doc3
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0215 Silver Oaks Multi~Farnily\Planning\Draft Rcsolution.doc4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA05-0235
Project Description:
A Development Plan to construct 110 age-restricted
condo units and a recreational facility on 7.5 acres
located on the northwest corner of Margarita Road and
Dartolo Road
Assessor's Parcel No.
959-080-011, 959-080-012, 959-080-013
MSHCP Category:
Residential
DIF Category:
Residential - Attached
TUMF Category:
Residential - Multi-Family
Approval Date:
May 17, 2006
May 17, 2008
Expiration Date:
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three
Hundred Fourteen Dollars ($1,314.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and
Fifty Dollar ($1 ,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the
Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources
Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-
hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check
as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Pfanning\Draft COA.doc
1
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.0235 Silver Oaks Mutti-Family\Planning\Oraft COA.doc
2
Planning Department
2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
5. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application
Nos. PA05-0235 and PA05-0236 (Exhibit B).
6. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two- year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
7. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of
time, one year at a time.
8. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and
elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
10. The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials,
equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied
by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or
technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the
condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the
real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision
to the Planning Commission for its decision.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft COAdoc
3
Material
Stucco
Stucco
Accent
Accent
Trim
Trim
Roof
Roof
Color
Expo Genoa 226
Expo Benavento
Dunn-Edwards Canyon Abill DE 3166
Dunn-Edwards Burnt Crimson SP 165
Dunn-Edwards Muddy Tide DE 3014
Dunn-Edwards Gold Coast DE 3209
Monifer Lifetile Brown Blend 1 LSCS3233R
Monifer Lifetile California Mission Blend
1 LSCS6464
Elderado Stone - Nantucket Stacked Stone
Stone
Stone Elderado Stone - Castaway Stacked Stone
Enhanced Paving Stamped Concrete - Ashlar Slate Pattern in
Mottled Grey
11. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
12. The applicant shall paint a 3' x 3' section of the building for Planning Department inspection,
prior to commencing painting of the building.
13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
14. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These
shall be clearly labeled on site plan.
Public Works Department
15. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of way.
16. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
17. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Oratt COA.doc
4
18. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent
post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent
non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering any storm drain system or receiving
water.
19. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted to the City. The WQMP will
include site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment
mechanisms.
20. The proposed access on Margarita Road shall be restricted to a right in/right out movement.
Fire Prevention
21. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
22. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2250 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2650 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A).
23. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 3 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
24. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required (CFC 903.2).
25. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2).
26. Any/All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC 902.4).
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
5
Community Services Department
27. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris including debris caused from the razing of existing buildings. Only the
City's franchisee may haul construction and demolition debris.
28. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
29. All parkways including within the ROW, landscaping, recreational facilities, fencing and on
site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance assoCiation.
30. The trash service for the recreation center area shall include at least one bin for recycling.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi.Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
6
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:\Planning\2005\PAD5-0235 Sliver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Drah COA.doc
7
Planning Department
31. A copy of the rough grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department.
32. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical
plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior
to final agreement with the utility companies.
33. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project
site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the
Director of Planning.
34. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
Public Works Department
35. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for
work within their right-of-way or facilities per letter dated September 22, 2005.
36. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
37. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
38. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
39. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
8
40. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
41. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading,
Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's
standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
42. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number
(WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of
construction activities.
43. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Public Works Department
44. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
45. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
46. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05~0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
9
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS..Q235 SlIver Oaks Multi-Farnily\Planning\Dratt COA.doc
10
Planning Department
47. All externally mounted gutters and downspouts visible from any public right-of-way shall be
internalized. All others shall be painted to match the surface to which the elements are
attached.
48. All mechanical equipment including air conditioning units shall be completely screened from
public view.
49. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. Provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
c. Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans.
d. One copy of the approved grading plan.
e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
f. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
g. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map.
h. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper grow1h and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
50. Street scene plantings shall be incorporated to be compatible with adjacent project plantings
as approved by the Director of Planning. The applicant shall field verify adjacent existing
plantings and coordinate proposed streetscape plantings to be compatible. Streetscapin9
on Dartolo Road shall match the existing plantings on the south side of Dartolo to the west.
Streetscaping on Margarita shall match the existing plantings on the east side of Margarita
Road at the shopping center.
51. Focal points shall be established at project entries and at the corner of Margarita Road and
Dartolo Road as approved by the Director of Planning. Tree and shrub species, locations
and layout shall reinforce these focal points.
52. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. A three-foot clear zone shall be
provided around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department. Utilities shall be
grouped together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an
after-thought. Planting beds shall be designed around utilities. All light poles shall be
located on the landscape plans and shall not conflict with trees.
G:\PJanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Mulli-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
11
53. The applicant shall insure that mature plantings will not interfere with utilities, adjacent site
existing structures and landscaping and traffic sight lines. All traffic sight lines shall be
shown on the landscape plans.
54. A minimum five-foot width planting area shall be provided at the ends of all parking rows.
The planter length shall be equal to the adjoining parking space and contain a minimum of
one tree, shrubs and ground covers.
55. A minimum of one broad canopy type tree shall be provided per four parking spaces. The
trees shall be in close proximity to the parking spaces they are to shade. Crape Myrtle and
Palms are not considered broad canopy type trees.
56. Shrub quantities throughout the site shall be increased as approved by the Director of
Planning to provide an appropriate coverage balance between shrubs and ground covers.
57. Additional shrubs shall be installed between street sidewalks and the project perimeter walls
along Dartolo Road and Margarita Road as approved by the Director of Planning to break up
the long lineal visual wall lines and to be compatible with adjacent plantings.
58. The applicant shall coordinate plantings and the drainage swale along the north property line
insuring that appropriate screen trees and shrubs will be incorporated to soften and enhance
this view of the project from the adjacent properties as approved by the Director of Planning.
59. The applicant shall coordinate plantings and the bio-swale along the west property line
insuring that appropriate screen trees and shrubs will be incorporated to soften and enhance
this view of the project from the adjacent properties as approved by the Director of Planning.
60. Provide Wall and Fence Plans consistent with the Landscape Plans showing the height,
location and the following materials for all walls and fences:
a. Wrought iron with stone veneer pilasters to be provided along perimeter of property
adjacent to Margarita Road and Dartolo Road.
b. Material and color for block wall to be provided and approved along northern and
western portions of the properties adjacent to currently vacant land.
61. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screenin9. Provide a three-foot clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen.
Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like
an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on
plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
62. Building Construction Plans shall include details outdoor areas (including but not limited to
decorative furniture, and hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval
of the Planning Director.
Public Works Department
63. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, Final Map 33891 shall be approved and
recorded.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\?lanning\Draft COA.doc
12
64. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of T emecula Standard Nos. 400, 401 and 402.
e. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries.
f. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
g. Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing
topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades.
h. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
65. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Margarita Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include
installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk,
street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited
to water and sewer).
i. Modification to the raised landscaped median on Margarita Road to control
the right-in/right-out movement.
b. Improve Dartolo Road (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to include
installation of half-width street improvements plus six feet, paving, curb and gutter,
sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but
not limited to water and sewer).
66. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections.
67. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, storm drain
facilities, and sewer and domestic water systems.
b. Under grounding of existing or proposed utility distribution lines in accordance with
Ordinance 04-02 (Section 15.04.090 of the Temecula Municipal Code).
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
13
68. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
69. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
70. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
71. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Building and Safety Department
72. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
73. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on
March 31,2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee
schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
74. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
75. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
76. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
77. Show all building setbacks.
78. Developments with multi-tenant buildings or shell buildings shall provide a house electrical
meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire
alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with Single User Buildings shall
clearly show on the plans the location of a dedicated panel in place for the purpose of the
operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically
proposed.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
14
79. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
80. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1 , 1998).
81. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
82. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays
83. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
84. A sound transmission control study shall be prepared and submitted at time of plan review in
accordance with the provisions of Appendix Chapter 12, Section 1208A, of the 2001 edition
of the California Building Code.
85. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review.
86. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
87. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
88. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
89. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Fire Prevention
90. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
91. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet
(CFC sec 902).
G:\Planning\200S\PAOS.0235 Silver Oaks Multl-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
15
92. Prior to issuance of buildina oermits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1).
Community Services Department
93. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
94. Prior to the first building permit or installation of street lights on Margarita or Dartolo Roads,
which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit
an approved Edison Streetlight Plan and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the
transfer of street lighting into the TCSD maintenance program.
95. The developer shall satisfy the City's park land dedication requirement (Quimby) through
payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to .67 acres of land. Said requirement includes a 50%
credit for the private recreational facilities to be constructed within the development. The
amount of the in-lieu fee shall be calculated by multiplying the required amount of parkland
by the City's then current appraised land valuation as established by the City Manager and
shall be pro-rated at a per dwelling unit cost.
96. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by TCSD. The CC&R's shall state that the
HOA shall be invoiced for the trash service provided to the property owners.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Mulli-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
16
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY
THIS PERMIT
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
17
Planning Department
97. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant
shall be required to screen all mechanical equipment including air conditioning systems from
view of the public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical
equipment, is visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site,
the developer shall provide screening to be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning.
98. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
99. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one
year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the
bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
100. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with
disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000."
101. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
three square feet in size.
102. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed
prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
103. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
Public Works Department
104. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP
have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for
immediate implementation.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\PJanning\Draft COA.doc
18
105. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
106. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
107. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
108. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
Fire Prevention
109. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901 .4.3).
110. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum 12 inch numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six
inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six-inch high letters and/or numbers on
both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family residential units
shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau
(CFC 901.4.4).
111. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home
parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which
indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire
hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be
submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
112. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9).
113. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation (CFC Article 10).
114. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door (CFC 902.4).
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
19
115. Prior to final insoection of anv buildina" the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
Community Services Department
116. The develooer or his assignee shall submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most
current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
20
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Draft COA.doc
21
117. The aoolicant shall comply with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District letter dated September 19, 2005.
118. The aoolicant shall comply with the Rancho California Water District letter dated July 12,
2005.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks MuHi-Famlly\Planning\Draff CQA.doc
22
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
General Manager-Chief Engineer
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSlDE, CA 9250]
951.955.1200
951. 788.9965 FAX
51180.1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Sf? 2 2 2005
City ofTemecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92569-9033
Attention: ~.,j'l' ~\"'~..5
Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: 'f ADS - L>'l.. 310
The District docs not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities.
The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other 1\00<1
hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are nomally limited to items of
specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional 1\00<1 control and
orainage facilities which could be conSioered a logical com'p9flenl or extenSion of a master plan system, and District
Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, informalion of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply Distrtct approval or endorsement of the proposed project WIth respect to flood hazard, public health
and safety or any other such Issue:
No comment.
Thi~ project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan faCIlities nor are other facilities of
regional Interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District Will accept ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and
ins~ction will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
reqUired.
This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be
conSidered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership 01 sucn laClllues on wnuen request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District starKlards, and District plan check and inspection WIll be
required (or District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
This project is located within the limits of the District's Area
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable lees snoUIO De palo oy casrners check
or money order only to the FloOd Control District or City pnor to final approval of the project. or in the case of
aparcel map or subdivision prior to recordation of the final map. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in
effect at the time of recordation, or if deferred, at the time of issuance of the actual permit.
+ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right
of way or facilities. For further Information, contact the District's encroachment permit section at
951.955.1266. i~"'^\"f> Vf2.f'~\C- l-Ir-le:"
S;ENERAL INFORMA.TION
This project may re<luire a National Pollutant Discharge !=Iimination Svstem (NPDES) permit from. the St~te Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recora.tion, or other final approval shoUld not be given unlrl the City
has determined that the project has been grantea a permit or IS shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMAl mapped flood plain, then the City should
require !fie applicant to provide all studies calculations, .P1ans and other IIlformation required to meel FE~
requirements, and should further r",!uire that ihe applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) poor
to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this prol'ect, the City should reqUire the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Departmen of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or wrilten correspondence from these agencies indicating
the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certificalion may be
requirea from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit.
Very truly yours,
d?~~A
c:
Riverside County Planning Department
Altn: David Mares
ARTURO DIAZ
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: ;:?~ /f'~ ,v75
(
@
Rancho
Water
Board of Directors
Csaba F. Ko
President
Ben It Drake
Sr. YlcePresidellt
Stephen J. Corona
Rolph IL Daily
Lisa D. Herman
John E. Hoagland
Michael R. McMillan
Officers:
Brian J. Brady
~neralManager
Phillip L Forbes
Director Qf Finance-Treasurer
E.P. "Bob" Lemons
DirectGro(Engineering
PelT)' R. Louck
Director of Planning
Jeff D. Armstnmg
Controller
Linda M. Fregoso
Distnct Secretary/Administrative
Services Manager
C. l'>lichael Cowett
B~st Bellit & Krieger LLP
General Counsel
\.
\
August 19, 2005
Hannony Bales, Project Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
,~LIL 2 :!- ~D.JJ
SUBJECT: WATER A V AILABILITY; SILVER OAKS CONDOMINIUMS
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 33891
PARCELS NO.1, 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 9036
APN 959-080-011, APN 959-080-012, AND APN 959-080-013
CITY PROJECT NO. P A05-0235 AND P A05-0236
ITRUMARK COMPANIES]
Dear Ms. Bales:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore,
would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site water
facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the
property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and
requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency
Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
This project is a condominium-type development with on site water and fire control
systems being operated and maintained by a homeowner's association. RCWD
requires that the developer include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance
Agreement for anyon-site private water facilities, as a condition of the project.
w~nere a public water system is proposed within a private street, a perpetual
easement shall be dedicated to RCWD on the final map.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Mich el G. Meyerpeter, P.~.
Development Engineering M nager
4~(Ot
',",. ,(AN('"''
e~ CAC."'".'''''
l(r~ ,"VAT.'." .
. ~ :::I:,~~'~:~_.....
05\MM:lm082\FEG
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
RanchQ C.lllifomia Water District
4"'"'' W'_n"_n'__ <>~n~ _ D". 1""\=__ D... (""~ ~ _~"n_ ____
EXHIBIT B
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi.Family\Planning\Draft Resolution.docS
Project Description:
Location:
Applicant:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. PA05-0235, a Development Plan to
construct 110 age-restricted condo units on 7.5 acres and
Planning Application No. PA05-0236, Tentative Tract Map 33891
to create one lot for condo purposes.
The project is located on the northwest corner of Margarita Road
and Dartolo Road in the City of Temecula.
Vicki Mata
Trumark Companies
26447 Rancho Parkway South
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Air Quality
A temporary impact of emissions resulting from project related
construction activities. Emissions will be emitted by construction
equipment and fugitive dust will be generated during construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor
utilize diesel powered equipment that is equipped with a cooled
exhaust gas recirculation system.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor use
aqueous diesel fuel for the diesel powered equipment that is
operated during the demolition and construction phase.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of on-going field verification and inspections.
On-going during all grading and construction activities
Public Works and Building Department
Air Quality
The project may result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
in of suspended particles for which the project region is non-
attainment under federal and state ambient air quality standards.
Air emissions will be emitted by construction equipment and
fugitive dust will be generated during demolition, site preparation,
and construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor
utilize diesel powered equipment that is equipped with a cooled
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanningllnitial Study Comments\MMP.doc
1
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party: .
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
exhaust gas recirculation system during demolition, site
preparation, grading and construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor use
aqueous diesel fuel for the diesel powered equipment that is
operated during the demolition and construction phase.
The project proponent shall require that the construction
contractor limit the application of architectural coatings to 225
gallons per week and/or use zero volatile organic compound
(VOC) paint during construction.
Planning and Building staff will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verifications and
inspections.
On-going during grading and construction activities.
Public Works, Building Department, and Planning Department
Air Quality
A temporary impact resulting from project-related construction
activities may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentration on a temporary basis.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor
utilize diesel powered equipment that is equipped with a cooled
exhaust gas recirculation system during demolition, site
preparation, grading and construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor use
aqueous diesel fuel for the diesel powered equipment that is
operated during the demolition and construction phase.
The project proponent shall require that the construction
contractor limit the application of architectural coatings to 225
gallons per week and/or use zero volatile organic compound
(VOC) paint during construction.
Planning and Building staff will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verifications and
inspections.
On-going during grading and construction activities.
Public Works, Building Department, and Planning Department
G:\PlanningI2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanningUnitial Study CommentslMMP.doc
2
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Air Quality
A temporary impact of offensive odors and additional dust due to
the operation of heavy equipment during construction phases of
the project.
The project proponent required to provide a water truck to
continuously "water down" the graded areas to reduce the amount
of dust from excavation. During grading activities, the site shall be
watered down no less than three times per day in order to comply
with AQMD Rule 403-Fugitive Dust. In addition, all heavy
equipment must be regularly maintained to reduce emissions.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measure as part of on-going field verification and inspections.
On-going during all grading activities
Building Department and Planning Department
Biological Resources
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native
residents or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites.
Vegetation clearing shall be initiated prior to February 15 or after
August 15. If this is not feasible, all suitable habitats shall be
thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nests by a qualified
biologist no more than 5 days before commencement of any tree
removal.
Planning and Public Works staff will verify compliance with the
above mitigation measure prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Public Works
Biological Resources
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP.doc
3
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
residents or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites.
Vegetation clearing shall be initiated prior to February 15 or after
August 15. If this is not feasible, all suitable habitats shall be
thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nests by a qualified
biologist no more than 5 days before commencement of any tree
removal.
Planning and Public Works staff will verify compliance with the
above mitigation measure prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Public Works
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The project proponent shall prepare an assessment of the
archeological and cultural resources on the project property. The
assessment shall be performed by a qualified archeologist in
conjunction with the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians in order to
determine whether there are cultural resources on the property
and evaluate the significance of any such resource. Any such
testing shall involve the Pechanga Tribe, and all tests to determine
impacts should be cornpleted prior to the issuance of grading
permits.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measure prior to issuance of grading permits
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Planning Department and Public Works
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The project proponent is required to enter into a Treatment
Agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians. This
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi~Family\Plannjng\lnifjal Study Comments\MMP.doc
4
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural
resources and human remains that may be uncovered during
construction as well as provisions for tribal monitors.
The Developer is responsible for retaining the required personnel
and conducting the required meetings with the Building
Department and with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians in
order to enter into the required Agreement.
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Planning Department, Building Departrnent, and Pechanga Band
of Luiseno Indians
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall
be allowed to monitor all grading, excavating and ground-breaking
activities, including further surveys, to be compensated by the
project proponent. The Pechanga Tribe monitors will have the
authority to temporarily stop and redirect grading activities to
evaluate the significance of any archeological resources
discovered on the property, in conjunction with the archeologist
and the Lead Agency.
The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and the Planning
Department shall monitor the above mitigation measure as part of
on-going field verification and inspections
On-going during all grading, excavation, and ground-breaking
activities
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and the Planning Department
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
If human remains are encountered, all activity shall cease and the
County Coroner must be notified immediately. All activity must
cease until the County Coroner has determined the origin and
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-Q235 Silver Oaks Multi.Family\Planning\lnitiaJ Study Comments\MMP.doc
5
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
disposition of said remains. The Coroner shall determine if the
remains are prehistoric, and shall notify the State Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC) if applicable. Further actions shall
be determined by the desires of the Most Likely Descendent
(MLD).
The Planning Department, Building Department, County Coroner,
and the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians shall be notified in the
event of any human remains being discovered on the site.
On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project
Planning Department and Building Department
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The landowner shall agree to relinquish to relinquish ownership of
all cultural resources, including all Luisefio sacred items, burial
goods and all archeological artifacts that are found on the project
site to the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians for proper treatment
and disposition.
The project proponent shall notify the Planning Department and
Building Department in the event any resources are discovered. A
representative from the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians shall
be notified to determine the significance of the discovery.
On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project
Planning Department and Building Department
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
All sacred sites within the project area are to be avoided and
preserved.
The project proponent shall notify the Planning Department and
Building Department in the event any resources and/or human
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks MultiRFamily\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP.doc
6
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
remains are discovered. A representative from the Pechanga
Band of Luiseiio Indians shall be notified to determine the
significance of the discovery.
On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project
Planning Department, Building Department, and Pechanga Band
of Luiseiio Indians
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The project proponent shall develop a Paleontological Resource
Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) in accordance with the
recommendations of the City of Temecula and the County of
Riverside for the excavation phase of the proposed project when
construction excavation reaches depths below five feet. This
project is designed to conform to the agency guidelines for
administration of CEQA and those of the Society of Vertebrate
Paleontology. It includes the following steps:
. A trained paleontological monitor shall be present during
ground-disturbing activities within the project area in
sediments below a depth of five feet that have been
determined likely to contain paleontological resources.
The monitoring for paleontological resources shall be
conducted on a half-time basis. The monitor shall be
empowered to temporarily halt or redirect construction
activities to ensure avoidance of adverse impacts to
paleontological resources. The monitor shall be equipped
to rapidly remove any large fossil specimens encountered
during excavation. During monitoring, samples shall be
collected and processed to recover microvertebrate
fossils. Processing will include wet screen washing and
microscopic examination of the residual materials to
identify small vertebrate remains.
. Upon encountering a large deposit of bone, salvage of all
bone in the area will be conducted with additional field
staff and in accordance with modern paleontological
techniques.
. All fossils collected during the project will be prepared to a
reasonable point of identification. Excess sediment or
matrix will be removed from the specimens to reduce the
bull and cost of storage. Itemized catalogs of all material
G:\Planning\2005'PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP.doc
7
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
.. .->
collected and identified will be provided to the museum
repository along with the specimens.
. A report documenting the results of the monitoring and
salvage activities and the significance of the fossils will be
prepared.
. All fossils collected during this work, along with the
itemized inventory of these specimens, shall be deposited
in a museum repository for permanent curation and
storage.
If fossils are identified, monitoring shall be increased to full-time.
The project proponent is responsible for retaining the required
personnel and providing an agreement document to the City of
Temecula for review.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent shall submit appropriate soils and geologic
hazard investigation reports, including a cone penetration test to
verify lateral extent of liquefiable zone and total settlement.
The project proponent is responsible for submitting the reports to
the City of T emecula
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study CommentslMMP.doc
8
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact
Mitigation Measures:
The site shall be cleared of all vegetation, trees, structures and
debris. The materials resulting from the clearings and grubbing
operations should be removed from the site. If on-site sewage
disposal systems are presently in operation, septic tanks should
be pimped dry and removed as part of the demolition.
The project proponent is responsible for clearing the site.
Planning and Building staff will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measure prior to the issuance of any earthwork on the
site.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that over-excavation shall
be performed in accordance with the Preliminary Geotechnical
Report.
The project proponent is responsible for providing the required
documents to the City of Temecula. Planning and Building staff
will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure prior to
the issuance of any earthwork on the site.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Planning Department, Public Works, and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that the final bottom
surfaces of all excavations shall be observed and approved by the
project geotechnical consultant prior to placing any fill and/or
G:\Planning\2005\PAOs.o235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\lnifJal Study Comments\MMP.doc
9
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
structures. Based on observations, removal of localized areas
deeper than those documented may be required during grading.
The bottom of the excavations shall be scarified in accordance
with the Preliminary Geotechnical report.
Public Works and the Building Department will verify compliance
with the above mitigation measure as part of field verifications and
inspections prior to the issuance of any earthwork on the site.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Public Works and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects. including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that earth materials at the
site shall be excavatable with conventional heavy-duty earth
moving equipment.
The project proponent is responsible for demonstrating the above
mitigation measure.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Public Works and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects. including the risk of loss, injury. or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that during earth
movement activities that they shall adhere to all recommendations
advanced in the relevant soils and geologic hazard investigation
reports approved by the City of Temecula.
The Building Department and Public Works will verify compliance
with the above mitigation measures as part of on-going field
verifications and inspections.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-D235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanning\lnitial Study CommenlslMMP.doc
10
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Prior to grading plan issuance
Building Department and Public Works
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent shall complete further investigation using
Cone Penetration Tests and Geo Probe Tests to verify the lateral
ex1ent of liquefaction and associated settlement.
The Building Department and Public Works will verify compliance
with the above mitigation measures as part of on-going field
verifications and inspections. The project proponent is
responsible for providing all required documentation.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Building Department, Public Works, Project Proponent
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent shall submit and updated Geotechnical
Analysis to the Planning Department for review.
The project proponent is required to submit the updated
documents.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Project proponent and Planning Department
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Jnitial Study Comments\MMP.doc
11
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent shall submit a construction related noise
mitigation plan to the City for review and approval. The plan shall
depict the number, types, and location(s) of construction
equipment and how the noise from the equipment will be reduced
during construction of the proposed project.
The project proponent is responsible for submitting all required
documents to the City of Temecula for review and approval
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Building Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent shall demonstrate that during all project site
excavation and grading onsite, the construction contractors shall
equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly
operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufactures'
standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary
construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away
from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities
Building Department
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning~nitia[ Sludy CommentslMMP .doc
12
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent's construction contractor shall locate
equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance
between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive
receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities
Building Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent's construction contractor shall limit all
construction-related activities that would result in high noise levels
according to the construction hours to be determined by the City
staff.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities
Building Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent's construction contractor shall limit haul
truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Mulli-FamiiylPlanningllniUal Study CommentslMMP.doc
13
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
equipment. To the extent feasible, haul routes shall not pass
sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
Prior to certificate of occupancy issuance
Planning Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent shall be required to build a noise barrier for
the second-floor balcony facing at Unit 53. The barrier shall be at
a height of 5 feet above the finished floor of the balcony. The
barrier may consist of a solid base plus a transparent "plexi-glass"
upper section continuously wrapped around the edge of the deck.
The upper section shalf be constructed of 3/8-inch glass or Y, inch
thermoplastic.
The Planning Department will verify compliance through
inspections to the site prior to the release of occupancy.
Prior to certificate of occupancy issuance
Planning Department
Noise
Cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project.
The project proponent shall submit an acoustical analysis to
ensure that noise levels will not exceed a CNEL of 70 dBA exterior
and 45 dBA interior. The interior noise analysis shall include
requirements such as air-conditioning and/or mechanical
ventilation system, and sound-rated windows and doors as a
means of achieving compliance for any homes where the future
exterior noise levels are expected to exceed CNEL of 60 dBA.
G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning~nitial Study CommentslMMP.doc
14
Specific Process:
The project proponent is responsible for conducting and
submitting the required analysis to the Planning Department
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to building permit issuance
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Planning Department
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanningllnitial Study CommentslMMP.doc
15
ATTACHMENT NO.5
INITIAL STUDY
G:lPlanning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanning\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
15
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
I Project Title
Lead Agency Name and Address
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location
Project Sponsor's Name and Address
I General Plan Designation
I Zoning
Description of Project
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Other public agencies whose approval
is required
Environmental Checklist
Trumark Companies - "Silver Oaks"
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Harmony Linton
Assistant Planner
(951) 694-6400
The project is located on the northwest corner of Margarita Road and
Dartolo Road in the City of Temecula
Trumark Companies
Vicki Mata
26447 Rancho Parkway South
Lake Forest, CA 92630
I Professional Office
Professional Office
The proposed project is to construct 110 age-restricted condo units
and create one lot for condo purposes on a 7.32 acre site
The project site is specifically bounded by: De Portola Road and
vacant land to the north; Margarita Road and a large commercial
center which includes a full-service grocery store (Albertsons/Sav-
on), Home Depot, service retail (optical, hair, nails, beauty supply),
restaurants, bank, and real estate offices to the east; Dartolo Road
and a signalized intersection at Margarita Road, a BP gas station
and small market to the south; and a domestic well station and
vacant land that is a proposed hospital site to the west
Eastern Municipal Water District, Rancho California Water District
G:\PlanningI2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanning\Initial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
-1-
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Agriculture Resources
X Air Qualitv
X Bioloqical Resources
X Cultural Resources
X Geoloqy and Soils
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology and Water Quality
Land Use and Planninq
Mineral Resources
X Noise
Population and Housinq
I Public Services
I Recreation
I Transportation/Traffic
I Utilities and Service Systems
X I Mandatory Findinqs of Siqnificance
I None
Determination
(To be completed by the lead agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the I?roiect proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed proiect, nothinq further is required.
~ llAil"7^
Lf }:;,/ ,mio
Date
Harmonv Linton
Printed Name
Citv of Temecula
For
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\PlanninglInitial Study Comments\Initial Study.doc
-2 -
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
I
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I a.
b.
I Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? I
Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
I Substantially degrade the existing visual character or I
qualitv of the site and its surroundinqs?
I Create a new source of substantial light or glare which I
would adverselv affect dav or niahttime views in the area?
x
X
Ic
Id
X
X
Comments:
1.a. No Impact: There are no designated scenic vistas on the project site. The project site is adjacent to an
arterial street and is located between an existing commercial center and the proposed regional hospital. The
proposed project site is located south of De Portola Road, west of Margarita Road, and north of State Route 79
(SR-79). No impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
1.b. No Impact: Refer to Response 1 (a) above for a description of the project site and vicinity. Additionally,
the proposed project site does not contain any scenic resources such as trees, rock outcropping, or historic
buildings. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
1.c. No Impact: Refer to Response 1 (a) and (b) above for a description of the project site and vicinity. The
site has been disturbed and structures currently exist on the site. The surrounding area to the north consists of
vacant land and residential homes. East of the site is a commercial center and vacant land that has been
graded in preparation for development. To the south of the site is an existing gas station and to the west is a
site that has been approved for a hospital. The proposed site will not substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of the site and its surroundings because the surrounding area is developed or is currently
being developed and the proposal is consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan and Development
Code Guidelines. Therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
1.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project site is located south of De Portola Road, west of
Margarita Road, and north of State Route 79 (SR-79). A commercial center is located to the east of the site
across Margarita, and a gas station is located to the south. The proposed project will introduce new lighting to
the area that could potentially impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. To mitigate this potential impact, all
lighting will be required to conform to the Riverside County Ordinance 655, which prohibits light spillage onto
adjacent properties and certain fixtures which have the potential to emit glare into the light. the proposed
project site is located within the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance. This Ordinance restricts the types of
brightness of lighting that can be used, which requires that no additional light and glare occurs.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study. doc
- 3 -
2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in
assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
Issues and Supportinglnforrnation Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
b. I Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson
Act contract?
c, Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to
their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,
to non-aqricultural use?
x
x
x
Comments:
At present time the 7.32 acre proposed project site is vacant and developed land
2.a. No Impact: The project site is not designated a Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland). The project site has not been used for agriculture since the incorporation of
the City of Temecula in 1989. The development of the proposed project site consisting of a Tentative Tract
Map and a Development Plan would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be
required.
2.b. No Impact: The project site is designated as Professional Office by the City of Temecula General Plan
and Zoning. Senior housing is allowed and consistent with this designation. The project site is not zoned for
an agricultural use. Additionally, the property is not designated under a Williamson Act contract. No impact
would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
2.c. No Impact: Refer to Response 2 (a) above for a description of the project site and vicinity. No impact
would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study CommentslInitial Study. doc
-4-
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
No
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
la
Ib
x
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
Cl.uality plan?
Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
existinq or projected air quality violation?
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment
under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
x
c,
x
Id
Ie
x
x
Comments:
Reoional Air Qualitv
Many air quality impacts which derive from dispersed mobile sources, which are the dominate pollution
generators in the basin, often occurs hours later and miles away after photochemical processes have
converted primary exhaust pollutants into secondary contaminants such as ozone. The incremental regional
air quality impact of an individual project is generally very small and difficult to measure. Therefore, the
SCAQMD has developed significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted rather than on
actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not quantifiable on a regional
scale. The 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD Handbook) states that any project in the
SCAB with daily emissions that exceed any of the identified significance thresholds should be considered as
having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. These regional air quality SCAQMD
significance thresholds are identified in Table 3 - 1.
Local Air Qualitv
To assess local air quality impacts, the significance thresholds are relative to the State standards of 20 parts
per million (ppm) for 1-hour Carbon Monoxide (CO) concentration levels and 9 ppm for 8-hour CO
concentration levels. If the CO concentration levels with the proposed project are less than the standards, then
there is no significant impact to local air quality. If future CO concentrations with the proposed project are
above the standards, then the increase due to the project determines if the impact is significant or less than
significant. If the proposed project results in an increase of 1 ppm or more for the 1-hour averaging time and
0.45 ppm or more for the 8-hour averaging time, then the proposed project will have a significant impact to
local air quality.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 5-
Table 3 - 1: SCAQMD Regional Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant Emissions (Ibs/day)
ROG NOx CO SOx
Construction 75 100 550 150
Operation 55 55 550 150
Source: SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality
Handbook
PM10
150
150
3.a. No Impact: The proposed project site consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan is
consistent with the South Coast Air Basin Quality Management District Plan (SCAQMD). The applicant has
prepared and submitted an Air Quality Impact Analysis (Revised Air Quality Impact Analysis, DKS Associates,
August 25, 2005) which has concluded that the project will not conflict or obstruct implementation of the air
quality plan. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
3.b. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project site consisting of a
Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan has the potential to violate an air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Temporary emissions will result from project-
related construction activities. Air emissions will be emitted by construction equipment and fugitive dust will be
generated during demolition, site preparation and construction activities. Long-term operational emissions
generated by the proposed project will primarily be from motor vehicles. Other emissions will be generated
from the combustion of natural gas for space heating, landscaping equipment, and household consumer
products. In addition, emissions will be generated by the use of natural gas and oil for the generation of
electricity off-site.
Based on the information provided in an Air Quality Impact Analysis, the emissions of reactive organic gas
(ROG) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emitted during construction activities would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds
of significance; this would be considered a significant short-term impact. The ROG could reach a level of
282.55 Ibs/day and NOx could reach 187.92 Ibs/day, but with the incorporation of mitigation measures the
gases would both be reduced to a less than significant level below the SCAQMD threshold of 75 for ROG and
100 for NOx. The analysis also found that the long-term operations of the proposed project would not result in
emissions that would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance (Table J), therefore no significant long-
term impact would occur to regional air quality. In addition, the CO levels would not result in a significant long-
term impact to local air quality.
Table J - Operational Air Pollutant Emissions
Pollutant Emissions (Ibs/day)
Activity ROG NOx CO SOx PM10
Vehicular emissions 4.04 2.98 32.58 0.02 3.14
Natural Gas 0.11 1.40 0.60 0.0 0.0
Landscaping 0.14 0.02 1.26 0.03 0.0
Consumer Products 5.48 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Off-Site Electrical Production 0.02 1.99 0.35 0.21 0.07
Total Unmitigated 9.79 6.39 34.79 0.26 3.21
Emissions
SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No
Source: DKS Associates
Note: Calculated from URBEMIS 2002 rev.8.7.0
G:IPlonning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commenlsllnitial Study.doc
6 -
Based on the information provided in an Air Quality Impact Analysis, with the incorporation of suggested
mitigation measures for the construction-related emissions, the proposed project site consisting of a Tentative
Tract Map and a Development Plan will not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation.
3.c. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project site consisting of a
Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan may result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
suspended particles for which the project region is non-attainment under federal and state ambient air quality
standards. Air emissions will be emitted by construction equipment and fugitive dust will be generated during
demolition, site preparation and construction activities. The ROG could reach a level of 282.55 Ibs/day and
NOx could reach 187.92 Ibs/day during construction, but with the incorporation of mitigation measures the
gases would both be reduced to a less than significant level below the SCAQMD threshold of 75 for ROG and
100 for NOx. Long-term operational emissions generated by the proposed project will primarily be from motor
vehicles. Other emissions will be generated from the combustion of natural gas for space heating, landscaping
equipment, and household consumer products. In addition, emissions will be generated by the use of natural
gas and oil for the generation of electricity off-site.
Based on the information provided in an Air Quality Impact Analysis, with the incorporation of suggested
mitigation measures for the construction-related emissions the proposed project site consisting of a Tentative
Tract Map and a Development Plan will have a less than significant impact on the exposure of sensitive
receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
3.d. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project site consisting of a
Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations temporarily. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site includes a walk-in medical
center located approximately 75 feet south of the southern property line, a single-family home located
approximately 120 feet east of the northeast comer of the project site and a single-family home located
approximately 175 feet north of the northwest comer of the project site. Temporary emissions will result from
project-related construction activities which may expose these sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations. Air emissions will be emitted by construction equipment and fugitive dust will be generated
during demolition, site preparation and construction activities. Long-term emissions will be generated by the
proposed project will primarily be from motor vehicles. Other emissions will be generated from the combustion
of natural gas for space heating, landscaping equipment, and household consumer products. In addition,
emissions will be generated by the use of natural gas and oil for the generation of electricity off-site.
Based on the information provided in the Air Quality Impact Analysis, with the incorporation of suggested
mitigation measures for the construction-related emissions, the proposed project site consisting of a Tentative
Tract Map and a Development Plan will have a less than significant impact on the exposure of sensitive
receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
3.e. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project site consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan will not create any long term objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people.
The project consists of 110 age-restricted condo units and no objectionable odors are anticipated as a result of
this project. Temporary impacts typically associated with construction activities are anticipated, however they
are considered less than significant with mitigation measures in place.
Mitiaation Measures
AQ - 1: On-going during all grading and construction activities, the project proponent shall require that the
grading contractor utilize diesel powered equipment that is equipped with a cooled exhaust gas recirculation
system.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\Initial Study Comments\Initial Study.doc
-7 -
AQ - 2: On-going during all grading and construction activities, the project proponent shall require that the
grading contractor utilize aqueous diesel fuel for the diesel powered equipment that is operated during the
demolition, site preparation, grading and construction phases of the project.
AQ - 3: On-going during all grading and construction activities, the project proponent shall require that the
construction contractor limit the application of architectural coatings to 225 gallons per week and/or use zero
volatile organic compound (VOC) paint.
AQ - 4: On-going during all grading activities, the project proponent is required to provide a water truck to
continuously "water down" the graded areas to reduce the amount of dust from excavation. During grading
activities, the site shall be watered down no less than three times per day in order to comply with AQMD Rule
403-Fugitive Dust. In addition, all heavy equipment must be regularly maintained to reduce emissions.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglInitial Study Commentsl!nitial Study.doc
- 8-
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project?
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a.
Have a substantial adverse effect. either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive. or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect on any ripalian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and
Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands
as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal. fillinQ. hvdroloQical interruption. or other means?
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
I Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
resources. such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation
Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved
local, reQional. or state habitat conservation plan?
x
b.
x
c,
x
d.
x
Ie
f.
x
x
Comments:
The proposed project site is comprised of two vegetative conditions:
Disturbedlruderal conditions (4.6 acres)
Typically include areas cleared of natural vegetation as a result of disturbance activities and either lack
vegetation completely or support various non-native ruderal plant species. On site disturbed/ruderal areas
include those previously disturbed from their proximity to developed areas. The dominant plant species within
this portion of the proposed project site include black mustard (Brassica nigra), Russian thistle (Sa Isola tragus),
telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandiflora), slender tarweed (Hemizonia fasciculate), and horseweed (Conyza
canadensis). Other common plant species include horehound (Marrubium vulgare), foxtail chess (Bromus
madritensis ssp. Rubens) common sow thistle (Sonchus oleraceus), umbrella sedge (Cyperus involucratus),
white sweet clover (Meliotus alba), tocalote (Centaurea melitensis), tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca), mule fat
(Baccharis salicifolia) and dove weed (Croton setigerus). California black walnut (Juglans californica) and
cottonwood (Populus sp.) trees were also observed in this vegetation community. A Tree Survey was
completed to identify sizes, conditions, and locations of the native tree species onsite.
Developed conditions (2. 7 acres)
Occur in three parts along Margarita Road on the eastern end of the proposed project site. Ornamental
vegetation communities are the dominant plant cover type with these portions of the proposed project site.
Vegetation within this community includes various planted non-native ornamental species typically used for
aesthetic purposes.
G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commentsl!nitial Study. doc
-9 -
Wildlife
A limited number of animial species were identified onsite during the assessment, including house finch
(Carpodacus mexicanus), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), California
towhee (Pipilo crissalis), Bewick's wren (Thryomanes bewickii), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), mourning
dove (Zenaida macroura), northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), Anna's hummingbird (Calypte annal,
common raven (Corvus corax), western fenced lizard (Sceloporus occidental is), black-tailed jack rabbit (Lepus
californicus), cottontail (Sylvilgaus sp.) and California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi).
4.a. No Impact: The presence of protected, regulated, or otherwise sensitive plant and wildlife species
occurring or potentially occurring onsite is based on an evaluation of the habitat found on the proposed project
site. No plant or wildlife species listed as threatened or endangered was observed during the field
investigations conducted by PCR Services Corporation, referenced in the September 9, 2005 Biology
Assessment. The habitat surveyed was deemed unsuitable for most of those species with the potential to
occur onsite. The propose project site lies within the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP),
which requires focused surveys for just one sensitive species, burrowing owl, in order to concurrently satisfy
the conservation objectives of the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and United States Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
Burrowing Owl (BUOW) is a California Species of Concern (CSC), whose burrow sites are protected by state
law under the state Fish and Game Code. This species is a year-round resident of southern Californian annual
and perennial grasslands, deserts, and arid scrublands that are characterized by low-growing vegetation.
BUOW breeds from March through August, and individuals typically nest in pre-existing burrows that are
created by small fossorial mammals, but may alternatively use man-made structures for the same purposes. A
BUOW Phase I, II and III survey was conducted by PCR on the proposed project site.
The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) documents three occurrences of BUOW within the USGS
Pechanga quadrangle which encompasses the proposed project site. Although the proposed project site
contains suitable habitat for BUOW, no "sign" specifically characteristic of BUOW was observed during
investigations performed by PCR, nor was the species observed during the subsequent Phase II BUOW
surveys. With no confirmed presence of any individuals nesting onsite, no impacts to BUOW are expected,
and mitigation measures for BUOW do not need be incorporated into the proposed project site consisting of a
Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan implementation.
4.b. No Impact: The proposed project site is comprised entirely of residential development and
ruderal/disturbed vegetation, without any other significant plant community. Therefore, no impacts are
expected to occur to any sensitive communities as a result of the proposed project site consisting of a
Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan and no mitigation measures would be required.
4.c. No Impact: During the biological resources assessment on July 18, 2005, a general jurisdictional
determination was performed throughout the proposed project site. No drainages were located on the project
site in the historical literature or aerial photos, or exist on the proposed project site today. The results indicated
the absence of any "waters of the U.S," and/or "water of the State" onsite. Based on the results of the
determination a formal jurisdictional delineation will not be warranted. No impact would occur and no
mitigation measures would be required.
4.d. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project site contains vegetation,
(limited and/or disturbed) with the potential to support migratory songbird bird nest. Disturbing or destroying
active nests is a violation of the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Therefore, potentially significant
impacts may occur to nesting birds as a result of the proposed project. In addition, nests, live young, and eggs
are protected under the State of California's Fish and Game Code Section 3503. Mitigation for the taking of
active nests may be accomplished in two ways. The first way would be the initiation of vegetation clearing
prior to February 15 or after August 15 to avoid impacting nesting birds onsite. Alternatively, if construction
activities must occur during the nesting season (February 15 to August 15) all suitable habitat should be
G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanning\Initial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 10-
thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist before commencement of
disturbance activities. Typically, if an active nest is detected, the shrub containing the nest, along with a 200-
to 300- foot buffer around it, is flagged and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete.
Based on the information provided in the Biology Assessment, with the incorporation of suggested mitigation
measures, the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will have a less
than significant impact and will not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites.
4.e. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The City of Temecula encourages
preservation of existing trees, and is in the process of approving an official tree policy. The results of the tree
survey indicated that existing trees onsite included thirty-two native coast live oak trees, Western sycamore
trees, California black walnut trees and Fremont cotton wood trees that occur onsite within the landscape yard
of one residence and one commercial site (counseling center). Based on the results of the Tree Survey,
mitigation can be taken so that initiation of vegetation clearing is prior to February 15111 or after August 15
resulting in a less than significant impact. If this is not feasible, all suitable habitats should be thoroughly
surveyed for the presence of nests by a qualified biologist no more than 5 days before commencement of any
tree removal.
4.f. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will not
conflict with adopted any Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans. Specifically,
the MSHCP requirement for a burrowing owl survey (Phase I, II, and III) has already been complied with. No
impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
Mitiaation Measures
BR-1: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, vegetation clearing shall be initiated prior to February 15 or
after August 15. If this is not feasible, all suitable habitats shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of
nests by a qualified biologist no more than five days before commencement of tree removal.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
I ncoroorated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
la
Ib
Ic
Id
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an I
archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
I Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource I
or site or unigue geologic feature?
I Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside I
of formal cemeteries?
x
x
x
x
Comments:
5.a. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will not
have a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5. A
records search of the proposed project site did not indicate prehistoric or historic cultural resources within or
adjacent to the project area and none were identified by the survey. No impact would occur and no mitigation
measures would be required.
G:\Ptanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
-11-
5.b. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative
Tract Map and a Development Plan may have a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5. A records search of the proposed project site did not
indicate prehistoric or historic cultural resources within or adjacent to the project area and none were identified
by the survey. With the incorporation of mitigation measures provided by the Pechanga Band of Luiselio
Indian this potential impact has been mitigated to a less than significant level.
5.c. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The presence of sediments (Pauba Formation)
suitable to contain paleontological resources were found on site. Results of the literature review in the
Paleotogical Assessment (Paleontological Resource Assessment, LSA Associates, Inc., October 13, 2005)
reinforce the high potential for encountering significant nonrenewable vertebrate fossils at depth. LSA
recommends that a Paleontological Resource Impacts Monitoring Program (PRIMP) be included with
construction excavation at the site when exaction reaches a depth below five feet. This PRIMP includes
excavation monitoring and fossil salvage, fossil preparation and identification, repository curation, and a
compliance report.
Based on the information provided in the Paleotogical Assessment, with the incorporation of suggested
mitigation measures, the impacts to the paleontological resources will be less than significant.
5.d. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative
Tract Map and a Development Plan may disturb human remains, including those interred outside of formal
cemeteries. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no
further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find
immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD).
Mitiaation Measures
CR - 1: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project proponent shall prepare an assessment of the
archeological and cultural resources on the project property. The assessment shall be performed by a
qualified archeologist in conjunction with the Pechanga Band of Lusielio Indians in order to determine whether
there are cultural resources on the property and evaluate the significance of any such resources. Any such
testing shall involve the Pechanga Tribe, and all tests to determine impacts should be completed prior to the
issuance of grading permits.
CR - 2: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall enter into a Treatment Agreement
with the Pechanga Band of Luiselio Indians. This agreement will address the treatment and disposition of
cultural resources and human remains that may be uncovered during construction as well as provisions for
tribal monitors.
CR - 3: On-going during all grading, excavation and ground-breaking activities, Tribal monitors from the
Pechanga Band of Luiselio Indians shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and ground-breaking
activities, including further surveys, to be compensated by the project proponent. The Pechanga Tribal
monitors shall have the authority to temporarily stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance
of any archaeological resources discovered on the property, in conjunction with the archeologist and the Lead
Agency.
CR - 4: On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project, if human remains are encountered, all activity
shall cease and the County Coroner must be notified immediately. All activity must cease until the County
Coroner has determined the origin and disposition of said remains. The Coroner shall determine if the remains
are prehistoric, and shall notify the State Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) if applicable. Further
actions shall be determined by the desires of the Most Likely Descendent (MLD).
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanning\lnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 12-
CR - 5: On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project, the landowner shall agree to relinquish
ownership of all cultural resources, including all Luiselio sacred items, burial goods and all archeological
artifacts that are found on the project site to the Pechanga Band of Luiselio Indians for proper treatment and
disposition.
CR - 6: On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project, all sacred sites within the project area are to
be avoided and preserved.
CR -7: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project proponent shall develop a Paleontological
Resource Mitigation Program (PRIMP) in accordance with the recommendations of the City of Temecula and
the County of Riverside for the excavation phase of the proposed project when construction excavation
reaches depths below five feet. This project is designed to conform to the agency guidelines for administration
of CEQA and those of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. It includes the following steps:
A trained paleontological monitor shall be present during ground-disturbing activities within the project
area in sediments below a depth of five feet that have been determined likely to contain paleontological
resources. The monitoring for paleontological resources shall be conducted on a half-time basis. The
monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or redirect construction activities to ensure avoidance of
adverse impacts to paleontological resources. The monitor shall be equipped to rapidly remove any
large fossil specimens encountered during excavation. During monitoring, samples shall be collected
and processed to recover microvertebrate fossils. Processing will include wet screen washing and
microscopic examination of the residual materials to identify small vertebrate remains.
Upon encountering a large deposit of bone, salvage of all bone in the area will be conducted with
additional field staff and in accordance with modern paleontological techniques.
. All fossils collected during the project will be prepared to a reasonable point of identification. Excess
sediment or matrix will be removed from the specimens to reduce the bulk and cost of storage.
Itemized catalogs of all material collected and identified will be provided to the museum repository
along with the specimens,
A report documenting the results of the monitoring and salvage activities and the significance of the
fossils will be prepared.
. All fossils collected during this work, along with the itemized inventory of these specimens, shall be
deposited in a museum repository for permanent curation and storage.
If fossils are identified, monitoring shall be increased to full-time.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Mutti-FamilylPlanningllnilial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 13 -
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
. Incorporated .
Less
Than
Significa
nt Impact
No
Impact
la
c.
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse I
effects, includin>! the risk of loss, injury, or death involving.:
i. The rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of
Mines and Geolo>!y SJ)ecial Publication 42,)
Stron>! seismic ground shakin>!?
Seismic-related >!round failure, includin>!liquefaction?
I Landslides?
I Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? I
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of
the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks
to life or property?
Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
x
I ii.
I iii.
I iv.
lb.
x
X
X
X
X
d.
X
e.
X
Comments:
6.a.i. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map. A Preliminary
Geotechnical Investigation Report (Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report, Converse Consultants, May
13, 2005) review found that there are no known active faults projecting toward or extending across the
proposed project site. The site is not situated within any currently designated State of California Earthquake
Fault Zone. The nearest known active fault is the Elsinore Fault Zone, Wildomar Fault, which is located
approximately Y, mile from the site. The potential for surface rupture resulting from the movement of the
nearby faults is not known with certainty, but based on the location of the known active faults and the historic
movement of the faults, the potential for rupture is considered to be very low. Any potential significant impacts
will be mitigated through building construction, which is consistent with the Uniform Building Code standards.
6.a.ii. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: Refer to Response 6 (a.l) above for
discussion of faults. According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report (Preliminary Geotechnical
Investigation Report, Converse Consultants, May 13, 2005), the proposed project site is underlain by
predominantly silty sand, clay, and sand with silt. These soils are relatively fine to coarse grained and, in
general, in loose to dense conditions. Such soils are susceptible to significant differential settlement during
seismic shaking if mitigations methods are not implemented. Evaluation of soil borings and SPT data indicates
that the subsurface soils are sensitive to seismically induced settlement. Based on the Preliminary
Geotechnical Investigation Report analysis, the total seismically-induced settlement on the south portion is
estimated to be 6.65 inches. Further investigation is recommended using Cone Penetration Tests (CPT's) to
verify the lateral extent of liquefaction and associated settlement.
G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglInitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 14-
Based on the information provided in the Preliminary Soils Investigation Report, with the incorporation of
mitigation measures to provide further investigation using Geo Probe Tests (GPT's) to verify lateral extent of
liquefaction and associated settlement, the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan will have a less then significant impact.
6.a.iii. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: Based on the soil borings, reported in the
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report, laboratory testing results and evaluation procedures published
by Southern California Earthquake Center (March 1999), the underlying soil within the southern portion of the
property below 25 feet is susceptible to liquefaction under earthquake ground shaking. Settlement due to
liquefaction is estimated at 6.65 inches. Any potential impacts will be mitigated through building construction,
which is consistent with the Uniform Building Code standards. Additionally, further investigation using cone
penetration testing was recommended to verify the lateral extent of the liquefiable zone and total settlement.
6.a.iv. Less Than Significant Impact: Seismically induced landslides and other slope failures are common
occurrences during or soon after earthquakes. In the absence of significant group slopes, the potential for
seismically induced landslides to affect the proposed project site is considered to be nil. A less then significant
impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
6.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The grading activities required to facilitate development will alter the
existing topography of the site by moving earth to create building pads, streets, and other amenities. The
proposed grading activities are anticipated to be routine and review of engineered grading plans and with the
application of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for construction, required by the National Pollutant
Discharge Eliminating System (NPDES) the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan is not anticipated to contain any unstable soil or erosion conditions. A less then significant
impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
6.c. Less Than Significant Impact: Refer to Response 6 (b) for a discussion of existing geologic conditions
on the project site. A less then significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
6.d. Less Than Significant Impact: Refer to Response 6 (b) for a discussion of existing geologic conditions
on the project site. The results of geologic investigations indicate that the soils underlying the site generally
have a low expansion potential. A less then significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures would
be required.
6.e. No Impact. The proposed project would be connected to the local sewer system and no septic tanks or
an alternative waste disposal system would be required. Therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation
measures would be required.
Mitiaation Measures
GS - 1: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall submit appropriate soils and
geologic hazard investigation reports, including a cone penetration test to verify lateral extent of liquefiable
zone and total settlement, to the City of T emecula for review and approval.
GS - 2: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the site shall be cleared of all vegetation, trees, structures
and debris. The materials resulting from the clearings and grubbing operations should be removed from the
site. If on-site sewage disposal systems are presently in operation, septic tanks should be pimped dry and
removed as part of the demolish.
GS - 3: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent will demonstrate that over-excavation
shall be performed in accordance with the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report.
GS - 4: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent will demonstrate that the final bottom
surfaces of all excavations shall be observed and approved by the project geotechnical consultant prior to
G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study-doc
- 15 -
placing any fill and/or structures. Based on observations, removal of localized areas deeper than those
documented may be required during grading. The bottom of the excavations shall be scarified in accordance
with the Preliminary Geotechnical Report.
GS - 5: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent will demonstrate that earth materials at
the site shall be excavatable with conventional heavy-duty earth moving equipment.
GS - 6: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent will demonstrate that during earth
movement activities that they shall adhere to all recommendations advanced in the relevant soils and geologic
hazard investigation reports approved by the City of Temecula.
GS - 7: Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, further investigation is recommended using Cone
Penetration Tests and Geo Probe Tests to verify the lateral extent of liquefaction and associated settlement.
GS - 8: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project proponent shall submit an updated Geotechincal
Analysis shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review.
7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
c, Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of
an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
siqnificant hazard to the pubiic or the environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land use pian or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport, wouid the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the proiect area?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people residin9 or
workinq in the project area?
g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\PlanninglInitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 16-
Comments:
7.a. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would not
create a significant hazard to the public related to hazardous materials. Although the grading and construction
activities would require the use and transport of potentially toxic construction materials, potential hazards
related to this would be minimized through the compliance with existing Federal and State Occupation Safety
and Health (OSHA) regulatory requirements. In addition, although the construction activities and the ongoing
maintenance of the landscaping and structures would include the use of hazardous materials such as gasoline,
diesel fuel, herbicides, and solvents, the use of these materials would be typical of residential landscaping and
building maintenance and would pose a low risk of hazard. Therefore, development of the proposed project
consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would not create a hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the
environment. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
7.b. No Impact: Gasoline has leaked from tanks and/or related equipment at the ARCO station located
immediately south of the project site (44239 Margarita Road). This has impacted underlying soil and
groundwater. A soil gas survey was conducted at the project site to detect the presence of any gas vapors for
public health and safety purposes. The soil gas survey concluded that near-surface soil gas does not appear
to impact the areas of the proposed project buildings. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures
would be required.
7.c. No Impact: Sparkman Elementary School is within one-quarter mile of the project site. Implementation
of the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would not emit hazardous
emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous material, substances, or waste. No impact would occur
and no mitigation measures would be required.
7.d. Less Than Significant: According to the City of Temecula, the project site is not listed as a hazardous
materials site pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. In addition, the project site was addressed in a
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. The Phase I ESA, as updated, includes a records review of Federal
and State Regulatory Agencies. The database search reviewed Federal and State lists of known or suspected
contaminated sites, known handlers or generators of hazardous waste, known hazardous waste disposal
facilities, and permitted underground storage tanks (USTs) within a 0.5 mile radius of the proposed project site.
The proposed project site was not identified on any of these lists.
However, two properties that are known to have leaked petroleum hydrocarbons to underlying soil or
groundwater are located within a half-mile radius of the proposed project site. Environmental investigations
and remediation have been conducted at these properties. One property, Murdy Ranch located at 45375
Loma Linda Street, has a case closed status issued by the County of Riverside Environmental Health
Department (the environmental oversight regulatory agency). One case remains open and involves the ARCO
service station property located immediately south of the proposed project site at 44239 Margarita Road. The
property is reported as having a leaking underground storage tank (LUST) that has impacted surrounding soils.
During a site reconnaissance, several monitoring wells and associated fifty-gallon drums were observed in and
around the service station property. A remediation system located on the northwest site of the property was
also observed. Tait Environmental management, Inc. (TEM) estimates that a low probability exists that this
property has environmentally impacted the proposed project site based on the following facts: (1) The ARCO
service station is listed as having impacted soil only; (2) Fourth quarter 2004 groundwater monitoring data for
wells located immediately upgradient of the proposed project site (wells MW - 8, MW - 9, MW - 12, and MW -
14) indicate only trace quantities of fuel oxygenates. No other off-site properties were identified that may be
likely to significantly affect the site. No significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be
required.
7.e. No Impact: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport. The closest public airport or public use airport is the French Valley Airport located
G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitiaI Study Commentsllnitial Study. doc
- 17-
la
b.
If
approximately 9 miles to the north. The development of the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract
Map and a Development Plan would not introduce people into an area where there is a safety hazard as a
result of the public airport or public use airport. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be
required.
7.t. No Impact: The project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airport. The closest public airstrip
is French Valley Airport located approximately 9 miles to the north of the proposed project site. The
development of the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would not
introduce people into an area where there is a safety hazard as a result of a private airstrip. No impact would
occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
7.g. Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Temecula would provide the emergency response and
evacuation plans for the project site and vicinity. Access to the proposed residential development would be off
Margarita Road as a right in/right out movement and Dartolo Road as full access. Although the development of
the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would result in development
of vacant land, no significant changes in the circulation patterns in the project vicinity would occur. The
development of the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would not
impair the ability of the City to implement its emergency response plan or utilize emergency evacuation routes.
A less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
7.h. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan
implements the Temecula General Plan's vision for this area of Temecula. The project is not next to any
wildlands and would therefore, not adversely expose people or property to significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires. No significant impacts would result and no mitigation measures would be
required.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
No
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
c.
Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise substantially deqrade water guality?
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been wanted)?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream
or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion
or siltation on- or off-site?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream
or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-
site?
Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
Require the preparation of a Water Quality Manaqement Plan?
x
x
x
x
d.
x
e.
x
G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglInitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 18-
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
g.
Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area as mapped
on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
Place within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area structures which I
would impede or redirect flood flows?
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the
failure of a levee or dam?
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
x
I h
i.
x
x
Ii
x
Comments:
8.a. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will not
violate water quality standards or waste requirements. As discussed in Response 6 (b) above, although the
proposed project does have potential to result in erosion of soils during construction activities, erosion would
be addressed through the implementation of existing erosion control standards and policies imposed by the
City's grading permit requirements.
In addition, the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would provide
an on-site storm drainage system comprised of inlets that would drain surface run-off into the on-site facilities
to be conveyed to off-site stormwater facilities. The project will be developed in accordance with Best
Management Practice (BMPs) required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). No
impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
8.b. No Impact: The development of the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan would not change the groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. No
impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
8.c. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will not
substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course
of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite. No
impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
8.d. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will not
substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course
of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding onsite or offsite. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
8.e. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will not
create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. No impact would occur and no mitigation
measures would be required.
8.t. Less Than Significant: The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements established by the State of California. However, the project is required to prepare a Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP) pursuant to the Municipal Separate Storm-Sewer permit (MS4 permit)
issued by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. The WQMP was submitted on August 18th,
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglInitial Study CommentslInitial Study.doc
- 19-
2005 and is under review by the Public Works Department The water quality control measures identified in
the WQMP have either been incorporated into the design of the project or have been added to the project with
specific conditions of approval and are expected to eliminate potential adverse impacts to receiving waters. A
less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
8.g. No Impact: A review of National Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM, November 20, 1996) indicates that
the project site is within Flood Hazard Zone "X". Zone "X" is designated as "Areas of 500-year flood; areas of
1 DO-year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and
areas protected by levees from 1 DO-year flood." The proposed project site is not within the 1 DO-year flood
zone, therefore no impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
8.h. No Impact: Refer to Response 8 (g) above for a description of the project site and vicinity. No impact
would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
8.L No Impact: The proposed project is within the Vail Lake dam inundation area. Temecula Creek, which is
the primary drainage course in the immediate area, was dredged as a result of Assessment District 159.
Improvements and dredging were completed in 1996. The RCWD owns Vail Lake Dam and has submitted to
the City a Dam Inundation report, which includes language pertaining to the dredging of Temecula Creek. An
additional study obtained from the Riverside County Flood Control, Flood Insurance Study, and Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), November 20, 1996 further discusses the dredging of Temecula
Creek. The FEMA study shows that the dredging now allows for additional carrying capacity in the event of a
major flood or an event such as the failure of Vail Lake Dam. The proposed project is not anticipated to
impede or redirect flood flows. As a condition of approval a drainage plan is required; this plan will address
flow and drainage and provide comments and/or recommendation concerning the failure of the Vail Lake Dam.
While the current City of Temecula Final EIR identifies the project site as being within the Vail Lake Dam
Inundation Area, the recent improvements to Temecula Creek have mitigated this potential impact
8.j. No Impact: Due the distance of the project site from the Pacific Ocean or from any lakes or water bodies
of significant size, the development of the proposed project would not result in the exposure of people or
structures to hazards due to a seiche or tsunami. In addition, the project site is not located within an area
subject to mudflow hazards. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I a.
b.
Phvsically divide an established community?
Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoidinq or mitigatinq an environmental effect?
Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
x
X
[c
X
Comments:
The site of the proposed project is vacant and developed land. The proposed project site is designated
Professional Office (PO) on both the General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps. Senior housing is consistent
with this zoning designation.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanning\Initial Study CommentslInitial Study.doc
- 20-
9.a. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan is
developed and vacant land. Surrounding land uses included sparsely developed land abutting the site to the
north; a proposed hospital site to the west; a medical center to the south; and a grocery store to the east. The
project is bound to the west with Margarita Road and Dartola Road to the South. Based on existing land uses
and land use patterns in the City the proposed project will not physically divide the community. No impact
would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
9.b. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan does not
conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the General Plan, Specific Plan, Coastal Program, or Zoning Ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation of an environmental effect. No impact would occur and no mitigation
measures would be required.
9.c. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan does not
lie within any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. The project site is
not located within a Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) criteria cell. No impact would occur and
no mitigation measures would be required.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planningllnitial Study CommentslInitial Study. doc
-21 -
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of value to the region and the residents of the
state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan or other land use plan?
Comments:
Less Than
Sig nificant
Impact
No
Impact
x
x
10.a. No Impact: The project site is not located within an area with known mineral resources of significance,
as designated by local, regional, and State agencies. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures
would be required.
10.b. No Impact: The project site is not designated as a locally-important mineral recovery site in the City of
Temecula General Plan, the RCIP, or specific plans, or other land use plans. No impact would occur and no
mitigation measure would be required.
11. NOISE. Would the project result in:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporate
d
X
a.
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess
of standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other aqencies?
Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne I
vibration or qroundborne noise levels?
A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
eroiect vicinity above levels existing without the proiect?
A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
~roiect?
For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
Ib
IC
d.
e.
f.
G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
-22 -
Less
Than
Significant
Impact
X
X
X
No
Impact
X
x
Comments:
The maximum noise level allowed is determined by land use. The following describes adopted City policies
related to noise control standards, ex1erior noise impact, and interior noise impacts.
Noise Control Standards: The City of Temecula General Plan Noise Element specifies a maximum allowed
noise level of 70 dBA CNEL exterior and 45 dBA CNEL interior for attached condominium units land uses.
These standards represent the maximum exterior and interior noise levels that would be considered
acceptable based on the noise levels that are generated by any adjacent mobile sources, such as automobiles,
trucks and trains.
Exterior Noise Impacts: To determine the existing and future ex1erior noise levels for the receptors at the site,
noise modeling of the site was conducted using the Caltrans Sound32 (Caltrans 1987) traffic noise model with
California noise emission factors (Calve no 1987). The Sound32 Model is based on the industry standard
FHWA RD 77-108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model.
Interior Noise Impacts: The City requires that interior noise levels not exceed a CNEL of 45 dBA Typically,
with the windows open, building shells provide approximately 15 dBA of noise reduction. Therefore, rooms
exposed to an ex1erior CNEL greater than 60 dBA could result in an interior CNEL greater than 45 dBA
11.a. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project consisting of a
Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan may result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise
levels in excess of standards established in the City of Temecula General Plan unless mitigated.
The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will result in an increase in
the existing noise levels due to construction equipment and activities, but this would be on a temporary basis
and considered a less than significant impact.
In relation to traffic-generated noise levels, the City's General Plan Noise Element specifies a maximum
allowed noise level of 70 dBA CNEL exterior and 45 dBA CNEL interior for this land use type. A Noise Impact
Analysis (Noise Impact Assessment, RGP Planning and Development Services, December 8, 2005) was
conducted to analyze the potential impacts of the proposed project, identify off-site noise receptors in the
project vicinity and addresses the effects of off-site noise including vehicle noise on the adjacent roadway. It
was determined that the future noise levels for first-floor exterior receptors are all within the City's 70CNEL
exterior noise standard. However, one second-floor exterior receptor in the northeastern portion of the site
facing margarita Road would experience future noise levels up to 72 CNEL To mitigate this impact, a barrier
shall be required for this unit that consists of a solid base plus a transparent plexi-glass upper section to
continuously wrap around the edge of the deck. This mitigation shall reduce the impact to 67db CNEL
Prior to building permits the project proponent shall submit an interior acoustical analysis to ensure that interior
noise levels will not exceed a CNEL of 45dBA. The analysis shall include requirements such as air-
conditioning and/or mechanical ventilation systems, and sound-rated windows and doors as a means of
achieving compliance for any homes where the future exterior noise levels are expected to exceed a CNEL of
60 dBA
11.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The development of the proposed project site would require
construction equipment and activities that could generate groundborne vibration and noise on a short-term
basis. No long-term vibration or noise would occur due to the ongoing operation of the proposed project
consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan as a senior (55+) attached condominium unit
development.
Due to the short-term basis of the construction-related vibration that may occur, a less than significant impact
would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglInitial Study CommentslInitial Study.doc
- 23 -
11.c. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is not expected to cause a substantial permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above the levels existing without the proposed project.
The development of the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would
result in increases in the existing ambient noise levels due to: the ongoing operation of a senior (55+) attached
condominium units development, including vehicular traffic and the use of onsite recreational facilities.
However, in light of the distance to the nearest off-site receptors (> 350') and the existing and future levels of
ambient noise created by the public roadways in the local vicinity, the project's total contribution to ambient
noise level increases at off-site receptors are expected to be minor (ie; < 1 dBA CNEL). Therefore, the impact
would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required.
11.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan may result in a temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels during construction
and thereafter. Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet,
which is considered annoying. However, this source of noise from construction of the project will be of short
duration and therefore would not be considered significant. Furthermore, the project will comply with City
ordinances regulating the hours of construction activity from 6:30 A.M. to 6:30 P.M. Monday through Friday
and 7:00 A.M. to 6:30 P.M. on Saturday. Construction will not be permitted Sundays and nationally recognized
holidays. A less than significant impact is anticipated at this time.
11.e. No impact: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport. The development of the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and
a Development Plan would not expose people residing on the project site to excessive noise levels associated
with a public airport. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
11.t. No impact: The project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The development of the
proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would not expose people
residing on the project site to excessive noise levels associated with a private airport and/or private airstrip. No
impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
Mitiaation Measures
NO - 1: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall submit a construction related noise
mitigation plan to the City for review and approval. The plan shall depict the number, types, and location(s) of
construction equipment and how the noise from the equipment will be reduced during construction of the
proposed project.
NO - 2: On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities, the project proponent shall demonstrate
that during all project site excavation and grading onsite, the construction contractors shall equip all
construction equipment fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with
manufactures' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that
emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site.
NO - 3: On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities, the project proponent's construction
contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-
related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.
NO - 4: Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the project proponent's construction contractor shall limit
all construction-related activities that would result in high noise levels according to the construction hours to be
determined by the City staff.
NO - 5: Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the project proponent's construction contractor shall limit
haul truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction equipment. To the extent feasible, haul
routes shall not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study CommentslInitial Study.doc
-24 -
NO - 6: Prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the project proponent shall be required to build a
noise barrier for the second-floor balcony facing at Unit 53 (identified in Figure 5 of this report). The barrier
shall be at a height of 5 feet above the finished floor of the balcony. The barrier may consist of a solid base
plus a transparent "plexi-glass" upper section continuously wrapped around the edge of the deck. The upper
section shall be constructed of 3/8-inch glass or Y:.. inch thermoplastic.
NO - 7: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project proponent shall submit an acoustical analysis to
ensure that noise levels will not exceed a CNEL of 70 dBA ex1erior and 45 dBA interior. The interior noise
analysis shall include requirements such as air-conditioning and/or mechanical ventilation system, and sound-
rated windows and doors as a means of achieving compliance for any homes where the future ex1erior noise
levels are expected to exceed CNEL of 60 dBA.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a.
Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly
(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the I
construction of replacement housinq elsewhere?
x
b.
x
Ic
x
12.a. Less Than Significant Impact: From 1990-2004, the population of Temecula nearly tripled from
27,099 to 77,460. That was a gain of 50,361 people or 185.8% (Exhibit 1). During this period, Southwest
Riverside County (census tracts in and around Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore) grew by 148.3% and
Riverside County as a whole by 51.8%. Temecula's rapid population growth represents a relatively new
phenomenon for Southern California. The City's large increase (18.3%) in 2002 was due to the Vail Ranch
annexation. Another 5,500 was added in 2005 with the Redhawk annexation. The proposed project consisting
of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would permit the development of 110 senior attached
condominium units. The proposed project would generate an additional 258 residents (based on an average
household size of 2.3 persons per dwelling unit). The additional residents anticipated by this project would
represent less than significant of the existing City population. This increase is considered to be a less than
significant impact and no mitigation measures would be required.
12.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan would involve the displacement of three existing homes and the families that live within the
homes. The proposed project would provide for the construction of 110 new homes. The temporary loss of
the existing homes and displacement of families is not considered a significant impact. Therefore, the
development of the proposed project would not substantial displace existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere. A less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation
measures would be required.
12.c. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan would involve the displacement of three existing homes and families that live within the
homes. This is not a substantial number of people. Therefore, the development of the proposed project would
not displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.
A less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 25-
13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I a.
lb.
r c.
Id
I e.
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
x
X
X
X
X
Comments:
13.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan would result in addition structure, which would increase the need for fire protection services
to the area. The Riverside County Fire Department, through a cooperative agreement provides fire protection,
fire prevention, and emergency medical rescue services for the City. In addition to the four fire stations serving
Temecula, the City began the FAST program (Faster Ambulance Service in Temecula) on July 27, 1999.
The program consists of a paramedic squad vehicle which responds to calls inside the City limits within five
minutes. The site is located Y:i mile from the location of the interim Southside Fire Station and approximately 2
miles south of existing Pauba Road Fire Station. In addition to the primary fire engine, a paramedic
ambulance, reserve fire engine, water tender, and breathing support unit are all housed there. Therefore, the
proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan impact to fire protection
services would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. (City of Temecula
website, accessed September 9, 2005, www.citvoftemecula.ora)
13.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The development of the proposed project consisting of a Tentative
Tract Map and a Development Plan has some potential to increase the demand for law enforcement services
in the area. Law enforcement services for the project area are provided by the Temecula Police Department,
which contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department for Police services. The nearest police station
to the project site is approximately 3.4 miles northwest of the site. Response tirne to the project area ranges
frorn one to three minutes for in-progress emergency calls and 10-45 minutes for non-emergency calls. Prior to
the approval of Tentative Tract entitlements, the project will be reviewed by the Temecula Police Department
and conditioned with any necessary site-specific design features. Therefore, the potential impacts of the
proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan, with standard protocols for
tentative map review and the imposition conditions of approval, the impacts to law enforcement services would
not be considered a significant. A less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation measure would
be required. (City of Temecula website, accessed September 9, 2005, www.citvoftemecula.ora)
13.c. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan is a
senior housing attached condominium community and it is not anticipated to generate students. The proposed
project will be subject to the City of Temecula School fees. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures
would be required.
13.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Temecula takes pride in providing its citizens with over 30
beautiful parks and joint-use and community facilities, including a skate park and roller hockey arena.
Community facilities include two recreation centers, an outdoor amphitheater, a gymnasium, two swimming
pools, a senior center, the Temecula Museum, Imagination Workshop (Temecula Children's Museum), sports
fields, and picnic shelter areas that can be reserved for parties or picnics.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study CommentslInitial Study.doc
-26-
The City requires payment of a Parks and Recreation Fee per dwelling unit, a portion of which will be placed in
a fund to purchase land for future parks and a portion will be applied for existing park maintenance and
improvements. As outlined in the City's General Plan, this fee is considered sufficient to mitigate the
cumulative impacts of additional future residential development on the need for more park space within the
City. Compliance with City standards and requirements by payment of the in-lieu park fees would provide that
a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
13.1. Less Than Significant Impact: The development of the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract
Map and a Development Plan will result in the increased use of public facilities, including roads, schools,
parks, libraries, police, and fire protection services. However, the ongoing maintenance of these facilities is
funded through the collection of taxes, development fees and other funding sources to maintain City facilities in
acceptable conditions. Compliance with City standards and requirements by payments of fees would provide
that a less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required_
14. RECREATION. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less
Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
x
x
Comments:
14.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not result in substantial deterioration of
existing regional or neighborhood parks; however, it can be anticipated that the residences of the proposed
project will utilize the parks in the area. Since the proposed project consists of 110 age-restricted condo units,
the impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. The proposed project will be required to pay the
appropriate Quimby fees, in accordance with City of Temecula ordinances, which will provide for future park
facilities. A less than significant impact is anticipated.
14.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project includes the construction of a recreational faCility
for use by the residents. The proposed project is not anticipated to require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. The proposed project
will be required to pay the appropriate Quimby fees, in accordance with City of Temecula ordinances, which
will provide for future park facilities. A less than significant impact is anticipated.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 27-
15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation
to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system
(i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or
conQestion at intersections)?
b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county congestion management
aQency for desiqnated roads or hiqhways?
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results
in substantial safely risks?
d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.q.. farm equipment)?
e. I Resuit in inadequate emerQency access?
I f. I Result in inadequate parkinq capacity?
g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
x
x
x
x
x
X
X
Comments:
Traffic Impact Analysis Summary
The traffic impact analysis (Revised Traffic Impact Analysis, DKS Associates, November 11, 2005) was scoped
based on discussions with City staff and is summarized below to facilitate preparation and understating of this
environmental document The study objectives of this traffic impact analysis include:
1. Documentation and analysis of existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the project site.
2. Evaluation of the traffic impacts from the proposed project on the street network in the vicinity of the
proposed project
3. Assessment of project access and internal circulation
4. Determination of additional circulation system features and system management actions needed to
achieve the City of Temecula's level of service (LOS) requirements with implementation of the
proposed project
In addition, this traffic impact analysis defines the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) significance
thresholds and responds to the CEQA Initial Study Checklist questions related to the potential traffic impacts of
the proposed project.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\PlanninglInitial Study CommentslInitial Study.doc
- 28-
Based on discussion with the City Traffic Engineer, the study intersections have been determined as follows:
1. Margarita Road/De Portola Road
2. Margarita Road/Dartolo Road
3. Margarita Road/SR 79
4. SR 79/Pechanga Parkway
5. SR 79/Butterfield Stage Road
6. Margarita Road/Rancho California Road
Existing Traffic Conditions
Existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic counts were collected in the study area in May 2005.
Roadways
The following describes the existing roadways in the study area.
Margarita Road
Margarita Road is located along eastern boundary of the project site and provides direct access to the
site via a right in/right out unsignalized driveway. Margarita Road runs in a north-south direction and is
a four-lane (two lanes in each direction) divided roadway with a raised median. Margarita Road is
designated as a Major Arterial in the vicinity of the project site in the City's General Plan. South of its
intersection with SR 79, Margarita Road becomes Redhawk Parkway. The posted speed limit on
Margarita Road is 45 miles per hour (MPH).
De Portota Road
De Portola Road is located north of the project site and travels in an east-west direction until its
connection with Ynez Road to the west, where it runs north-south. De Portola Road is a four-lane
divided roadway with a raised median east of Margarita Road. and is a two-lane (one lane in each
direction) undivided roadway west of Margarita Road. In the City's General Plan, De Portola Road is
designated as a Modified Secondary Arterial west of Margarita Road, and a Major Arterial east of
Margarita Road. The posted speed limit on De Portola Road in the vicinity of the study area is 45 MPH.
Dartoto Road
Dartolo Road is located immediately south of the project site and runs in an east-west direction. Dartolo
Road is a relatively short access roadway since it terminates at about 700 feet west from its intersection
with Margarita Road. Dartolo Road currently provides primary access to existing uses on the south
side of the roadway including an ARCO Gas Station, the Mission Medical Center (a walk-in medical
center), and smaller retail uses (dry cleaners, dentist office, etc.). There is no posted speed limit on
Dartolo Road.
State Route 79 (SR 79)
State Route 79 (SR 79) is located south of the project site and is a six-lane (three lanes in each
direction) divided roadway with a painted median. SR 79 is designated as a Principal Arterial in the
vicinity of the project site in the City's General Plan and is also a State facility maintained by the
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglInitial Study CommentslInitial Study.doc
-29 -
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). SR 79 provides regional access to the project site.
The posted speed limit on SR 79 is 55 MPH.
Thresholds of Sianificance
Methodology
The Short-Term Baseline traffic analysis conducted by DKS contained traffic volumes from the following
cumulative developments in the study area:
. Proposed Phase 1: 170 bed hospital
. Proposed Phase I: 80,000 square foot medical office
. Proposed church and ancillary school west of the Temecula Medical Center
. Traffic from regional and local background growth
Per City requirements, the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method was applied to assess intersection
level of service (LOS) in the study area. The ICU methodology is based on peak hour turn movement volumes
and considers the geometric configuration of an intersection when measuring capacity. The ICU method sums
the volume-to-capacity 01/C) ratios for the critical movements of an intersection, and thus accounts for the
overall performance of intersections which are the most critical limitations within a city's roadway system.
LOS is a qualitative description of traffic operations for roadway facilities.
Significance Criteria
According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the minimum LOS standard has been established at LOS D
(0.90 V/C) for peak-hour intersection impacts. Therefore, if a specific project causes an intersection to operate
below the minimum standard of LOS D (0.90 V/C) to LOS E or F (0.91 V/C or greater), the project would cause
a significant impact at that intersection, and specific mitigation measures would be required to improve the
intersection's LOS back to satisfactory levels.
15.a. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan consists of the development of 110 senior attached condominium units with recreation
areas including a pool, a pedestrian circulation system, and a vehicular circulation system on the
approximately 7.32 acre project site.
The traffic analysis provided in Section 4.0 of the traffic impact analysis (TIA) indicates that the proposed
project would generate approximately 390 trips a day, nine (9) trips during the a.m. peak hour, and 12 trips
during the p.m. peak hour. Based on the review of Table E in Section 5.0 of the TIA, the addition of the
proposed project's traffic to the a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic to the Short-Term Baseline Condition would not
create a significant traffic impact since it would not cause any changes to the LOS at the study intersections.
The traffic added by the proposed project would cause the a.m. volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio to increase by
0.01 V/C at the intersection of Margarita Road/Dartolo Road, however the intersection would continue to
operate at LOS A The V/C ratios at all other intersections would remain the same compared to the Short-
Term Baseline Condition.
Therefore, although during the a.m. peak hour the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a
Development Plan would result in an increase of 0.01 V/C at the intersection of Margarita Road/Dartolo Road,
the intersection would continue to operate at LOS A In addition, the V/C ratios and LOS at the other five study
area intersections would remain the same. Consistent with the City's thresholds of significance defined above,
the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would not result in a
significant impact due to the addition of project-related trips on the City's existing roadways and intersections in
the project vicinity and no mitigation measures would be required.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanning\lnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study. doc
- 30-
15.b. Less Than Significant Impact Based on the traffic analysis in Section 5.0, the V/C ratios and LOS at
the two State controlled intersections, Margarita Road/SR 79 and SR 79/Pechanga Parkway would remain the
same when project traffic is added in the Short-Term plus Project condition. The addition of project traffic,
individually and cumulatively, would be immeasurable as V/C ratios and LOS would not change. Therefore,
the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would not result in a
significant impact to County Congestion Management Agency designated roads or highways and no mitigation
measures would be required.
15.c. No Impact The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan would
not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location
that results in a substantial safety risk. The nearest airports are a private landing strip located approximately
2.5 miles to the northeast and French Valley Airport located approximately six miles to the north. No impact is
anticipated and no mitigation measures would be required.
15.d. Less Than Significant Impact. Access to the proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and
a Development Plan would be primarily provided via a new right in/right out, unsignalized driveway on
Margarita Road, north of Dartolo Road. The full access driveway would be located approximately 300 feet
north of Dartolo Road and would require removal of the existing raised median along Margarita Road to
accommodate full access movements. Secondary access would be provided via a new full access driveway
on Dartolo Road. Dartolo Road starts at Margarita Road in the east and terminates approximately 750 feet
west of its intersection with Margarita Road. The intersection of Margarita Road and Dartolo Road is currently
signalized and no mitigation measures would be required.
The proposed project's trips would be relatively low compared to the rest of the traffic volumes along Margarita
Road. In addition, signalized full-access movements from the site would be available through the secondary
access to the Margarita Road/Dartolo Road intersection. In addition, all internal roadways and driveways have
been designed in accordance to the City of Temecula's design guidelines including minimum turning radii and
line of sight distances at intersections. No impact is anticipated due to a design feature and no mitigation
measures would be required.
15.e. No Impact. The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan is
located approximately one-half mile from the nearest fire station. Access for emergency vehicles would be
provided at the secondary (right inlright out) access driveway on Margarita Road and the primary (full) access
driveway on Dartolo Road. The project site provides for a 24 foot wide internal loop road with another internal
road through the center of the site. Additionally, "hammerhead" driveways are provided at each corner of the
site to allow for emergency vehicle and large truck turnaround areas. Therefore, no impact is anticipated due
to inadequate emergency access and no mitigation measures would be required.
15.t. No Impact. Per Table 17.24.040 - Parking Spaces Required, in the City's Development Code, the
parking requirement for senior housing is .5 covered parking spaces per dwelling unit plus 1 uncovered space
per 5 dwelling units for guest parking. Based on this parking requirement, 55 covered spaces are required and
22 uncovered spaces are required for the 110 attached senior condominium units. Based on review of the site
plan, a total of 110 covered parking spaces have been provided for residents and 23 guest parking spaces plus
6 motorcycle spaces have been provided totaling 136 parking spaces by the City's Development Code
calculations. Therefore, the project would provide adequate parking consistent with the City's Development
Code. Therefore, no impacts related to parking would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglInitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 31-
I a.
b.
If
Ig
15.g. No Impact. The project site is located within walking distance to medical and neighborhood-serving
retail services. Bus service for the project site is provided by the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) with Route
24, which runs nearby the project site along SR 79. The proposed project has been designed in accordance
with adopted policies, plans, and programs supporting alternative transportation. No impact is anticipated due
to a conflict with an adopted policy, plan, or program supporting alternative transportation and no mitigation
measures would be required.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
No
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
c.
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Reqional Water Quality Control Board?
Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
reQulations related to solid waste?
x
x
x
x
d.
x
e.
x
x
Comments:
16.a. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will not
exceed the wastewater requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board. The proposed
project has a "will-serve" letter from the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). The "will-serve" letter
indicates that the district will provide service to the proposed project site. No significant impact would occur
and no mitigation measures would be required
16.b. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will not
result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. No
impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
16.c. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will not
result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. No impact
would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
16.d. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan has
sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlement and resources. The proposed
G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 32-
project site has a "will-serve" letter from the Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Urban Water
Management Plan's (UWMP) are required by Water Code Sections 10610 through 10656 of the Urban Water
Management Planning Act. Each plan must provide detailed information related to water supply, water
demand and reliability for a 25-year period. The proposed project is within the UWMP's future development
plan. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required.
16.e. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan has a
"will-serve" letter from the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). No impact would occur and no mitigation
measures would be required.
16.t. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any
potential impacts from solid waste created by the proposed project can be mitigated through participation in
Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
16.g. No Impact: The proposed project consisting of a Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan will
comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. No impact would occur
and no mitigation measures would be required.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorl1orated
X
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
the maior periods of California history or l1rehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
proiects)?
Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
X
a
c.
X
17.a. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: As discussed in previous Section 1 - 16,
above the proposed project site will not cause impacts upon biological or cultural resources that cannot be
mitigated to less than significant levels.
17.b. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project consisting of a
Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan is not anticipated to have impacts that are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level.
17.c. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project consisting of a
Tentative Tract Map and a Development Plan is not anticipated to result in any environmental effects upon
human beings directly or indirectly that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\PlanninglInitial Study Commentsllnitial Study. doc
- 33 -
18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other
CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets.
I a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. I
b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects
were addressed by mitiltation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the
mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they
address site-specific conditions for the project
SOURCES
1. City of Temecula General Plan, 2005.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
4. DKS Associates, Revised Air Quality Impact Analysis Trumark Senior Condominium Development
Tentative Tract 33891, Temecula, California, November, 2005.
5. PCR, Results of a Biological Resources Assessment Conducted on the Temecula Tentative Tract No.
33891, Temecula, CA, September 2005.
6. PCR Results of a Phase I, II and III Burrowing Owl Surveys for the Temecula Tentative Tract No.
33891, Temecula, CA September 2005.
7. PCR, Results of a Tree Survey Conducted on The Temecula Tentative Tract No. 22891, Temecula, CA
September 2005.
8. LSA, Cultural Resources Assessment at Tract No. 33891, Temecula, CA, October 2005.
9. Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indian Letter, January 31, 2006.
10. Eastern Information Center, California Historical Resources Information System - Department of
Anthropology Letter, University of Riverside California (UCR), September 26, 2005.
11. LSA, Paleontological Resources Assessment at Tract No. 33891, Temecula, CA, October 2005.
12. Converse Consultants, Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report, Temecula Ca, May 13, 2005.
13. Tait, Phase I Environmental Assessment Trumark Companies Property 44099, 44155, and 44159
Margarita Road, Temecula, CA, May 20, 2005
14. Tait, Soil Gas Survey Report - Silver Oaks Project Site, Temecula, CA February 10, 2006.
15. RGP, Noise Impact Assessment for Trumark-Temecula Project, Temecula, CA, August 23, 2005.
16. DKS Associates, Revised Trumark Senior Condominium Development Tentative Tract Map 33891
Traffic, Temecula, CA, November, 2005.
17. OKS Associates, Cumulative Traffic Impact Analysis for Proposed Silver Oaks Development,
Temecula, CA February 1, 2006.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study Commentsllnitial Study.doc
- 34-
ATTACHMENT NO.6
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
16
Project Description:
Location:
Applicant:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. PA05-0235, a Development Plan to
construct 110 age-restricted condo units on 7.5 acres and
Planning Application No. PA05-0236, Tentative Tract Map 33891
to create one lot for condo purposes.
The project is located on the northwest corner of Margarita Road
and Dartolo Road in the City ofTemecula.
Vicki Mata
Trumark Companies
26447 Rancho Parkway South
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Air Quality
A temporary impact of emissions resulting from project related
construction activities. Emissions will be emitted by construction
equipment and fugitive dust will be generated during construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor
utilize diesel powered equipment that is equipped with a cooled
exhaust gas recirculation systern.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor use
aqueous diesel fuel for the diesel powered equipment that is
operated during the demolition and construction phase.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of on-going field verification and inspections.
On-going during all grading and construction activities
Public Works and Building Department
Air Quality
The project may result in a cumulatively consider'lble net increase
in of suspended particles for which the project region is non-
attainment under federal and state ambient air quality standards.
Air emissions will be emitted by construction equipment and
fugitive dust will be generated during demolition, site preparation,
and construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor
utilize diesel powered equipment that is equipped with a cooled
G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanning\lnitial StUdy Comments\MMP.doc
1
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
exhaust gas recirculation system during demolition, site
preparation, grading and construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor use
aqueous diesel fuel for the diesel powered equipment that is
operated during the demolition and construction phase.
The project proponent shall require that the construction
contractor limit the application of architectural coatings to 225
gallons per week and/or use zero volatile organic compound
(VOC) paint during construction.
Planning and Building staff will verify compliance with the above
rnitigation measures as part of on-going field verifications and
inspections.
On-going during grading and construction activities.
Public Works, Building Department, and Planning Department
Air Quality
A temporary impact resulting from project-related construction
activities may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentration on a temporary basis.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor
utilize diesel powered equipment that is equipped with a cooled
exhaust gas recirculation system during demolition, site
preparation, grading and construction.
The project proponent shall require that the grading contractor use
aqueous diesel fuel for the diesel powered equipment that is
operated during the demolition and construction phase.
The project proponent shall require that the construction
contractor limit the application of architectural coatings to 225
gallons per week and/or use zero volatile organic compound
(VOC) paint during construction.
Planning and Building staff will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verifications and
inspections.
On-going during grading and construction activities.
Public Works, Building Department, and Planning Department
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planningllnltial Study CommenlslMMP.doc
2
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Air Quality
A temporary impact of offensive odors and additional dust due to
the operation of heavy equipment during construction phases of
the project.
The project proponent required to provide a water truck to
continuously "water down" the graded areas to reduce the amount
of dust from excavation. During grading activities. the site shall be
watered down no less than three times per day in order to comply
with AQMD Rule 403-Fugitive Dust. In addition, all heavy
equipment must be regularly maintained to reduce emissions.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measure as part of on-going field verification and inspections.
On-going during all grading activities
Building Department and Planning Department
Biological Resources
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native
residents or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites.
Vegetation clearing shall be initiated prior to February 15 or after
August 15. If this is not feasible, all suitable habitats shall be
thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nests by a qualified
biologist no more than 5 days before commencement of any tree
removal.
Planning and Public Works staff will verify compliance with the
above mitigation measure prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Public Works
Biological Resources
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planningllnitial Study CommentslMMP.doc
3
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
residents or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites.
Vegetation clearing shall be initiated prior to February 15 or after
August 15. If this is not feasible, all suitable habitats shall be
thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nests by a qualified
biologist no more than 5 days before commencement of any tree
removal.
Planning and Public Works staff will verify compliance with the
above mitigation measure prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Public Works
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The project proponent shall prepare an assessment of the
archeological and cultural resources on the project property. The
assessment shall be performed by a qualified archeologist in
conjunction with the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians in order to
detemnine whether there are cultural resources on the property
and evaluate the significance of any such resource. Any such
testing shall involve the Pechanga Tribe, and all tests to determine
impacts should be completed prior to the issuance of grading
permits.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
rneasure prior to issuance of grading permits
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Planning Department and Public Works
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The project proponent is required to enter into a Treatment
Agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians. This
G:IPlanning12005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planningllnitial Study CommentslMMP.doc
4
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural
resources and human remains that may be uncovered during
construction as well as provisions for tribal monitors.
The Developer is responsible for retaining the required personnel
and conducting the required meetings with the Building
Department and with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians in
order to enter into the required Agreement
Prior to issuance of grading permits
Planning Department, Building Department, and Pechanga Band
of Luiseno Indians
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall
be allowed to monitor all grading, excavating and ground-breaking
activities, including further surveys, to be compensated by the
project proponent The Pechanga Tribe monitors will have the
authority to temporarily stop and redirect grading activities to
evaluate the significance of any archeological resources
discovered on the property, in conjunction with the archeologist
and the Lead Agency.
The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and the Planning
Department shall monitor the above mitigation measure as part of
on-going field verification and inspections
On-going during all grading, excavation, and ground-breaking
activities
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and the Planning Department
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
If human remains are encountered, all activity shall cease and the
County Coroner must be notified immediately. All activity must
cease until the County Coroner has determined the origin and
G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Mulli-FamllyIPlanningllnilial Study CommentslMMP.doc
5
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
disposition of said remains. The Coroner shall determine if the
remains are prehistoric, and shall notify the State Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC) if applicable. Further actions shall
be determined by the desires of the Most Likely Descendent
(MLD).
The Planning Department, Building Department, County Coroner,
and the Pechanga Band of Luiseiio Indians shall be notified in the
event of any human remains being discovered on the site.
On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project
Planning Department and Building Department
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The landowner shall agree to relinquish to relinquish ownership of
all cultural resources, including all Luiseiio sacred items, burial
goods and all archeological artifacts that are found on the project
site to the Pechanga Band of Luiseiio Indians for proper treatment
and disposition.
The project proponent shall notify the Planning Department and
Building Department in the event any resources are discovered. A
representative from the Pechanga Band of Luiseiio Indians shall
be notified to determine the significance of the discovery.
On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project
Planning Department and Building Department
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
All sacred sites within the project area are to be avoided and
preserved.
The project proponent shall notify the Planning Department and
Building Department in the event any resources and/or human
G:\PlanningI2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study CommenlslMMP.doc
6
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
remains are discovered. A representative from the Pechanga
Band of Luisefio Indians shall be notified to detennine the
significance of the discovery.
On-going during all earthmoving phases of the project
Planning Department, Building Department, and Pechanga Band
of Luiseno Indians
Cultural Resources
Cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical
resource, including archeological and/or paleontological
resources.
The project proponent shall develop a Paleontological Resource
Irnpact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) in accordance with the
recommendations of the City of Temecula and the County of
Riverside for the excavation phase of the proposed project when
construction excavation reaches depths below five feet. This
project is designed to conform to the agency guidelines for
administration of CEQA and those of the Society of Vertebrate
Paleontology. It includes the following steps:
. A trained paleontological monitor shall be present during
ground-disturbing activities within the project area in
sediments below a depth of five feet that have been
determined likely to contain paleontological resources.
The monitoring for paleontological resources shall be
conducted on a half-time basis. The monitor shall be
empowered to temporarily halt or redirect construction
activities to ensure avoidance of adverse impacts to
paleontological resources. The monitor shall be equipped
to rapidly remove any large fossil specimens encountered
during excavation. During monitoring, samples shall be
collected and processed to recover microvertebrate
fossils. Processing will include wet screen washing and
microscopic examination of the residual materials to
identify small vertebrate remains.
. Upon encountering a large deposit of bone, salvage of all
bone in the area will be conducted with additional field
staff and in accordance with rnodern paleontological
techniques.
. All fossils collected during the project will be prepared to a
reasonable point of identification. Excess sediment or
matrix will be removed from the specimens to reduce the
bull and cost of storage. Itemized catalogs of all material
G:\PlanningI2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Mulli-Family\Planning\initial Study CommentslMMP .doc
7
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
collected and identified will be provided to the museum
repository along with the specimens.
. A report documenting the results of the monitoring and
salvage activities and the significance of the fossils will be
prepared.
. All fossils collected during this work, along with the
itemized inventory of these specimens, shall be deposited
in a museum repository for permanent curation and
storage.
If fossils are identified, monitoring shall be increased to full-time.
The project proponent is responsible for retaining the required
personnel and providing an agreement document to the City of
Temecula for review.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure.
including liquefaction.
The project proponent shall submit appropriate soils and geologic
hazard investigation reports, including a cone penetration test to
verify lateral extent of liquefiable zone and total settlement.
The project proponent is responsible for submitting the reports to
the City of Temecula
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss. injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-o235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanning\lnitial Study Comments\MMP.doc
8
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
The site shall be cleared of all vegetation, trees, structures and
debris. The materials resulting from the clearings and grubbing
operations should be removed from the site. If on-site sewage
disposal systems are presently in operation, septic tanks should
be pimped dry and removed as part of the demolition.
The project proponent is responsible for clearing the site.
Planning and Building staff will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measure prior to the issuance of any earthwork on the
site.
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that over-excavation shall
be perfonmed in accordance with the Preliminary Geotechnical
Report.
The project proponent is responsible for providing the required
documents to the City of Temecula. Planning and Building staff
will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure prior to
the issuance of any earthwork on the site.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Planning Department, Public Works, and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that the final bottom
surfaces of all excavations shall be observed and approved by the
project geotechnical consultant prior to placing any fill and/or
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanning\lnitial Study Commenls\MMP.doc
9
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
structures. Based on observations, removal of localized areas
deeper than those documented may be required during grading.
The bottom of the excavations shall be scarified in accordance
with the Preliminary Geotechnical report.
Public Works and the Building Departrnent will verify compliance
with the above mitigation measure as part of field verifications and
inspections prior to the issuance of any earthwork on the site.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Public Works and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that earth materials at the
site shall be excavatable with conventional heavy-duty earth
moving equipment.
The project proponent is responsible for demonstrating the above
mitigation measure.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Public Works and Building Department
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent will demonstrate that during earth
movement activities that they shall adhere to all recomrnendations
advanced in the relevant soils and geologic hazard investigation
reports approved by the City of T emecula.
The Building Department and Public Works will verify compliance
with the above mitigation measures as part of on-going field
verifications and inspections.
G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial StUdy CommenlslMMP.doc
10
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Prior to grading plan issuance
Building Department and Public Works
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent shall complete further investigation using
Cone Penetration Tests and Geo Probe Tests to verify the lateral
extent of liquefaction and associated settlement.
The Building Department and Public Works will verify compliance
with the above mitigation measures as part of on-going field
verifications and inspections. The project proponent is
responsible for providing all required documentation.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Building Department, Public Works, Project Proponent
Geology and Soils
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects. including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving Strong
seismic ground shaking and/or seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction.
The project proponent shall subrnit and updated Geotechnical
Analysis to the Planning Department for review.
The project proponent is required to submit the updated
documents.
Prior to grading plan issuance
Project proponent and Planning Departrnent
G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilyIPlanningllnitial Study CommentslMMP.doc
11
Generallrnpacl:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Generallmpacl:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent shall submit a construction related noise
mitigation plan to the City for review and approval. The plan shall
depict the number. types, and location(s) of construction
equipment and how the noise from the equipment will be reduced
during construction of the proposed project
The project proponent is responsible for submitting all required
documents to the City of Temecula for review and approval
Prior to grading permit issuance
Planning Department and Building Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent shall demonstrate that during all project site
excavation and grading onsite, the construction contractors shall
equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly
operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufactures'
standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary
construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away
from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities
Building Department
G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study CommenlslMMP.doc
12
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact
Mitigation Measures:
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent's construction contractor shall locate
equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance
between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive
receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities
Building Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent's construction contractor shall limit all
construction-related activities that would result in high noise levels
according to the construction hours to be determined by the City
staff.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
On-going throughout earthmoving and construction activities
Building Departrnent
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent's construction contractor shall limit haul
truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Mulb-Family\Planning~nibal Sludy Comments\MMP.doc
13
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
equipment To the extent feasible, haul routes shall not pass
sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
The Building Department will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measures as part of on-going field verification and
inspections.
Prior to certificate of occupancy issuance
Planning Department
Noise
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies
The project proponent shall be required to build a noise barrier for
the second-floor balcony facing at Unit 53. The barrier shall be at
a height of 5 feet above the finished floor of the balcony. The
barrier may consist of a solid base plus a transparent "plexi-glass"
upper section continuously wrapped around the edge of the deck.
The upper section shall be constructed of 3/8-inch glass or Y:. inch
thermoplastic.
The Planning Department will verify compliance through
inspections to the site prior to the release of occupancy.
Prior to certificate of occupancy issuance
Planning Department
Noise
Cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project
The project proponent shall submit an acoustical analysis to
ensure that noise levels will not exceed a CNEL of 70 dBA exterior
and 45 dBA interior. The interior noise analysis shall include
requirements such as air-conditioning and/or mechanical
ventilation system, and sound-rated windows and doors as a
means of achieving compliance for any homes where the future
exterior noise levels are expected to exceed CNEL of 60 dBA.
G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0235 Silver Oaks Mulb-FamilylPlanningllnitial Study CommenlslMMP.doc
14
Specific Process:
The project proponent is responsible for conducting and
submitting the required analysis to the Planning Department
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to building permit issuance
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Planning Department
G.\PlanningI2005\PA05-0235 Silver Oaks Multi-Family\Planning\lnitial Study CommentslMMP .doc
15
ITEM #7
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date of Meeting:
Mav 17, 2006
Prepared by:
Christine Damko
Title: Associate Planner
Project Description: Planning Application No. PA05-0378, submitted by Matthew Fagan
representing Lennar Homes, is a Development Plan (Product
Review) for 130 detached single-family homes, on the north side
of Date Street, adjacent to the northeast corner of the intersection
of Ynez Road and Date Street in the Harveston Specific Plan
Plan 1, two- story, 2,434 square feet (14 units)
Tuscan (6 units)
American Farmhouse (4 units)
Cape Cod (4 units)
Plan 2, two-story, 2,854 square feet (30 units)
Tuscan (11 units)
American Farmhouse (10 units)
Cape Cod (9 units)
Plan 3, two-story, 3,036 square feet (42 units)
Tuscan (9 units)
American Farmhouse (17 units)
Cape Cod (16 units)
Plan 4, two-story, 3,063 square feet (44 units)
Tuscan (16 units)
Italian ate (13 units)
Cape Cod (15 units)
Recommendation:
~ Approve with Conditions
o Deny
o Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington. Home Product Rev\PJanning\STAFF REPORT.docl
CEQA:
I2l Notice of Determination
No further review required
(Section) 15162
Subsequent ND
D Negative Declaration
D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant: Matthew Faqan
Completion Date: December 8, 2005
Mandatory Action Deadline Date: May 17, 2006
General Plan Designation: Harveston Specific Plan
Zoning Designation: low Medium Density (lM)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Proposed Sinqle Family Residences/ Existinq Sinqle Family Residences
Arrovo Park
Proposed Sinqle Family Residences
Proposed Sinqle Family Residences
lot Area:
4,000 square feet minimum required/ 5,263 square feet
minimum proposed
Maximum lot Coverage: N/A
landscape Area/Coverage: N/A
Parking Required/Provided: 2 covered required /2 car qaraqes provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and
the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
G:\Plannjng\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston lIIBarrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\STAFF REPORT.doc2
ANALYSIS
Development Plan (Product Review)
Architectural Review
The project proposes four floor plans and three architectural styles for each floor plan. The
architectural styles include Tuscan, American Farmhouse, Cape Cod, and Italianate.
Staff believes that, with the attached Conditions of Approval, the project meets the intent of the
Development Code and the Harveston Specific Plan. The proposed elevations achieve an
overarching design to create a street scene with strong character as well as function, and visual
variety.
The various materials and features proposed include the following for each architectural style:
. Tuscan: (Plan 1 through 4) Smooth 20/30 sand stucco finish, concrete low profile "S" roof
tiles, decorative wrought iron elements on windows (on all sides), roof pitch variations
with a typical roof pitch of 4:12, 12-inch overhangs, exposed rafter tails (also on side and
rear elevations), porches extending out over six feet from home, decorative shutters on
prominent windows (on all sides), foam trim on all sides of windows, decorative front
door, decorative stone on main entries (including side elevation), decorative porte
cochere element, recessed garages, covered balconies with wrought iron railing on rear
elevation, decorative chimney caps, single story elements and four sided architecture.
. American Farmhouse: (Plan 1 through 3) Smooth concrete flat roof tiles, blended siding
and stucco, shed roof accents with a typical roof pitch of 5:12, forward facing intersecting
gables, decorative accent vents (on all sides), decorative shutters (on all sides), board
and batton siding (on all sides), decorative brick on front elevation extending out to sides,
single story elements, decorative chimney caps, decorative front and garage doors,
decorative front porches extending out six feet from home with railings, porte cochere
element, second story covered balcony on rear elevation with decorative beam and
railings.
. Caoe Cod: (Plan 1 through 4) Flat concrete roof tiles, roof pitch variations with a typical
roof pitch of 5:12 with a forward facing intersecting gable, 12" overhangs, blended shingle
siding and stucco, shingle siding extending to the side and rear elevations, decorative
shutters (on all elevations), decorative chimney cap, decorative garage and front doors,
light lace stucco, wood entry porch with decorative columns extending out over six feet
from home, decorative gable vent (including rear and side elevations), second story
covered deck on front elevation with a decorative wood railing, gable siding on front
elevation, decorative porte cochere element, recessed garages, decorative chimney
caps, single story elements and four sided architecture.
. Italianate: (Plan 4) Light lace stucco finish, concrete low profile "S" roof tiles, roof pitch
variations with a typical roof pitch of 4:12, 6 to 12 inch overhangs, rounded windows on
prominent windows of front elevation, decorative brackets under eaves (on all elevations),
decorative columns enhancing main entry, false second story balcony elements on front
and rear elevation, single story elements, decorative flower pot shelves on side and rear
elevations, wrought iron detailing on second floor of front elevation, decorative front door
and decorative chimney cap.
G:\Planning\200S\PAOS.0378 HalVeston III Barrington - Home Product Aev\Planning\STAFF REPORT.doc3
The applicant has provided specific details, which are unique to each style proposed on each
elevation, including roof line variations, materials, and window trim. Specifically, the varied roof
plans provide single-story architectural detailing to these two-story homes. In addition, the
homes include four-sided architecture. Materials such as wood detailing, stone, brick veneer,
roof type, pitch, and shutters add to the overall silhouette and architectural theme of the homes.
Suildina Elements/Mass. Heiaht and Scale
The proposed project includes four two-story floor plans with four elevations. The maximum
height for the units is 26 feet 1 inch, which meets the development standards and Harveston
Specific Plan requirements of the 35-foot maximum height regulation. The units provide
adequate articulation in roof forms and offsets to reduce massing and the elevations are visually
broken up with offset facade stories, changes in materials, architectural banding and/or sloping
roof lines. Proposed enhancements include second story and single-story roofline fagade
elements, decorative wood details, brick veneer, window shutters, and faux wood siding on
elevations, as well as window and door trim. Staff believes the proposed standard and
enhanced elevations meet the requirements of the Development Code and Harveston Specific
Plan.
The proposed units include well pronounced front entries with the use of arched entries,
extended porches, and the use of different materials around the entry. Garage and front doors
are distinct and compatible with the architectural style of the home. The proposed roof pitches
provide variety in the street scene and they are representative of the architectural style.
Materials and Colors
The project includes variation in building materials, such as stone, brick veneer, and colors which
help to provide for a varied and interesting streetscape. Each of the proposed elevation styles
provide different color schemes, which will result in fourteen compatible color schemes for the
130-home development The proposed colors coordinate and enhance the architectural theme
of the unit. Roof materials are compatible with the elevation style and complement the primary
building colors.
Product Placement
The units have been plotted to avoid repetition in plan and elevation type, which creates an
interesting and varied streetscape. In addition, the units also have varied front yard setbacks for
additional visual interest. The front yard setbacks vary from 10 feet to more than 18 feet with a
minimum average setback of ten feet
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project is consistent with the EIR that was prepared for the Harveston Specific
Plan and certified by the City Council. Therefore, in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and
a Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA Section 15162 - Subsequent
EIR.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\STAFF REPORT.doc4
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\STAFF REPORT.doc6
"B A R R I N G TON"
At Harveston 3
Temecula, Ca
Lennar Homes
40980 County Drive
Suite 110
Temecula, CA 92591
1
-_.-,.,"!--,--,
I
II,
I"
!Il,
\'11,
',',\
I"
, ,
,,'
" "
\\1,
.==--~-~ ~=
,./
~
. -
. ---
, --
/ ~
....~
.._-~:::::::~
,,\ ,,,
~-
'-;;';~
/'
,/<;7--
IIIIIIlI ~"- I _....: .-.... -.....-..1
"'"""""'..,..,. oc........' I
~'''~- .~. . I.._"_......~'"'
. -..~-
,,', , ~C"'."L~'.... __....._.___
HARVESTON PHASE 3
1R4CT32-437-1
"""'=' "'" "-'"
,,/
-7
ftB'A.........-
..~--~::::':'.~-
Ii:
T-
,
---..-
..,...,.-
HARVE~_TQI':-I PHASE 3
TRACT 32437-2
e.uANGTON PLOT F'LAN
;-'.
.q-41~A-
P
_7----
,~--r----i--_'i
'1'1 .- ',,'~
I~~n
I~?~~~'~ i
",. -'-;1-- ~~Q)!."------' ,~
TI', "'_'
-- -------'<'-::-:-~,.
','Y,5:;
-Cc--
~..
,
j
BRANDON LANE
SEE L-2 FOR PLANTING LEGEND & Narns I
n..r1
o. '" ,.,
,\ "
c
fG""---f ,.. ~ 10 '<0..,...
~
.KlHNNANNA.
ASSOCIATES
_'-,"'.~_A_._""..,,,,,
;:-.:':':~, ~,;:,,'. ';~";':;~~'~'~
,Io.....nmr
6
i I
I; ~ .; ~
8 6 ~i~ll
.. ~ ~~ng;
i ~ ~ n~ll
r! I ~
~
-
""'''Hg, M!I
,,"EO me<
I'tAN11NG
!UN
JOa"O
198
L-l
1 "' I ""rr'l'
.",".."......n.."......"""....
N'ft 11 1lItN;
PL,6,NTI..'!.s~Cl
~
~-"""""-"''''''''''''-'''''''.
ru":~J"'--=-
*G) ~_~<>DI'O_~""""<>
.. :G) ~~_<-~ntOII
.(..;)- ..,............_........,..,.....""'"
-l~l-'"-""""""'-...O><"L-
(~ .......~.'""""""......""
L)""".....~"""-"'OION..........-
(.f) :..~"""~:=::,;.~,~-
(~~.I ~"""" ...._......fI(..~..................._
_.."'...."'N........._'~_""""'.r..."_
i!H~~i!
~......,..........."""'.;;.-
- ~-
lil
C~)
.. (.!I
G.J
r,)
(0:1
l"0
.@
m;
@J
o
__.............. _C~y~_.....'_""-_,-"',
...._~....""'......lJC'V".__._
..,..,...~-_..'-.....-...",..."..,.,
,>I'"!._~.."""'".,..NTLA.y
~----........y,............~
..........-..."""'_...,.T....................__vENL.y.."""""'" ......
..,."""'_"""'....,.._._"............-00
.nT~..Tewo<A_.......""_","~
@
i?l
.. 1.0
.. ".,
~_"""'.'T--.-..'"
....-._--=--"'......................~
oa._....-.....___.....
'_""':r_~'
.""""""..ao........._",...-........
.. (Bl
(~,)
"
(.!?l
. (~
@
--..."""-...-.........------- ......
.......-..........."'='-"'-, """""''''''.........
-~-.............,............---
.......""'..........."""""""'T.._""""''''''T~
~-_.~........,,-
"I"'~
----.:;;:;;.;;;.-1lC'I'~-;;..~..<:>O_
-
'"~-=I
,.......-.....,.,.
,........--
'...................
..
...
.. .
-...-.._T....-........_~"'""'..
"""'""1LDfl_.-...",t>I!o...T....__
4~~_"""'IlO."""'-"""~......
."""""""""
~..".-...._.".,.......,.."-
---..--
~""""""!
o
l!iI!!iI
_=-y"'____~""""'Il'Iloo..
~...~.....,...._"""""""'......~=
~..:..-..,,-~~T'to
~~;".==~~-..-J
.........-.Yo....,.........""...............-_
..."""-.........,.."".....,_-.0101I,,......._
'.....'........ ~.......__..........",..<>erAU. ......
.""'............""""
l!iI!!iI
A
"'l...AN"'N~ NO"I"'E
~""~..."""'""'''<>'''-.,.OfoG,T~T.".T''_''''.'''''""'"..._'''"''-l.y_''''
[.. ~---~-~"..~._~.-::J-
- -.......L..,'"""'_T"..TT..,..,.,=.....,."..""""""T
~...,...."""'....,"",..,.~-
~-- ,-"
PO~Y' Pl.ANTIN(io ~e<&l!Nl:l
(:::1
@)
i(~!
'~!I
~~~.....~;-
~':~~'";.;~_T
-'-"'--'-.-.-
,.,.... - - .--ooM ...... _",
'-""~'--'~'"
,.,.....M...OIOWA.........",.........'L.r1i'1..O....
~D
r~)
....,..,"'.~._-'""'-.....""
'.......-.......-.
~:::..':.=~.;:;':....-
~=~~-------.-
=.~.~t<r-.:..=..=.,.""'"'_
~o:...."".",......_...~......'"
,-'.................~
=.:=...~~~~,.--,.-
PO'T"iER"fN~
,~,...~"'.......""""".._~- -,""",.,...'...
""",""",''''Hoeu!<._
:..,--:;;=::-"""""'"w~~'.,.lIoo<""" _""'...."..,-....
._~"'-""<-"""-....""....,,-...........,....,......---
. """""E>Il....O'OO_'"-......""'"',"""""""'''''''''''"'''........
NOT'!.!1
............,.,..__.......~7..-........."""'""""
~...i-==~~:;O.:::.::;,OONt_.._--
.,~-,..."...,""'"""..._..._~....
....,..._.N<a..~T........._""""-""...,.._Cf'
-=---.....,..-""-""-'-"---
~...~~~';;""'......_.............~.....""'""""
......~.........~....,...............-._...."""""""'"
::::=""""~............,.......,.............~-_-........
:....."'=-".=:;:u-_~~""".....,...'--
',A_N.........."'""-"......."'....."..,T.....""___
""""'_.....~Y..........,..,~-_............-..,.
_T_..."""S"--<D..."......._""~~-..&>
-'A_","","".,_on'",,"~--'"
._----....._""-"""""~
_""'..........._M......._...............-.-_.. _
..-a........~....,..._.......,.."._,...._-.....
_...,.,.._. ...,.......__....-_,__....r
....~........"".........""...c............___T-........
........""""""-......~-.-...........,..,.....,
-"""""'- ..............,................-......_...
-~,....""-...-"".""'"_......""-....................."""..
_~_y_..""""'........~A____""""""""
........"._........._~."..~,_~T_"'....,
_.....,__""""""""..._~A...................
""""'C'......'""""'-....",................. ""..,,--.. ...,..........__
........,""""'~....rT..."........""~
J..1Ne: InM e$TIMAi1!: OP= W\60... ANt' MA1'1!,,"I""'-1-~
Ne:CeMIA~Y TO CONvERT MOt'a. ,",OMe: GaMP!..EX TO
HAeIT~J..~ SPACeS
, _-..-._...._......_"'._........~"'-
. ....~._...""_Y."__"""......._2.-...."...""
~~,............."""""".............._"""'CCM<AlI'T1!
""_N<D~_"'"_..._~
.. ........................"......-....~._-"""...,......
"""""""'~...,.,._~""""oc<oI1l""''''''''~_
.._.~_(""'''''''.'''"'''''-....a~...,"'''''''''''''..",......,..,
. ""-"-""""
o="~"".:rT=.;:;~...--="'......-..-.~>>c>--.....
-.............. ""'~c-..-
._""""""_..........--''''......_--.""."....~-
"""'"''''''''''''~<'I<><N.",..'''''''"'''''''''.._"'"'''''''''__
~~-
.............."..:..,,<'
PltOJec~ l...AN~Ape: Iy;t.Rlc&ATlON Y"tATr=R us!!:
"ORw:;:ri$1. 2 ANt' 4
-."""'......-...............,..
--~"""~.".,..~.
-Y..............--
"""....-....--
""""'-'.."",.,.
""""""""''''''_''''''N<D
.........T"''''',.,.
I__o.~_______
=...""....-.,.................-
=...-...................
_.""""....fI(..".__.''':-~__
"".c...""''''''''......~
",-""",".""--
PItOJecT"Et' ~Osc.A,r>~ IRfltlGATION Y'\A.1"'EfIt USE
FOR L.OT " (X!!!I'ilISC....FI!!: MOCleJ..)
.....__<O""""""~....<'
A.....""_"""""iO<>.,.,.,
...........,~IKoo)
=-/::,~....--...
.........,.........._--.,
.......T.."",.,.
.....,........,~..-......
E----..
TOT...""~...._....""".................
'''''.....''''....--.........-
Y""...-=-......-
_f..""""....T'I!~~~...'""_
.,-'''''''''---
'......."
j~
.IOHNN....NN..
.SSOCI.TES
._0......0.."'"',..
;e'~,
I~__>_- )~
. ~1:;
6
M "I
~~~ ii~~
~ ~ ~~uH
~;~ U;;
I ~ p
~
"~',ON'
0.<'" O)4-1!K1lO
""",,,,,,,, M:l
5<<W ~"L
l'LOOlNG
LEGEND
AND NOIFS
!CON"
198
'HE"No
L-2
Qrl <H€r"
..............""..","'"."
AI'1II'11HI1
\tt'~
.,l . '"
!1.0.'~
~",. 'o;.:Il.
"',., _,.1_...,.__.
0( ;,JIj,,",..
'~.'
lD ROOF
g) FASCIA
Q) /..l9RTLAJ:ES'I'UCCO
(~) HORlZONTAL w;.JNG
ill BOAJtD4BArrBN5lDINO
@ nIM I COLUMN'S I ACCENT VEm'S
(:f) sm.t!5"ECIJ'JCEl'mtY'[J(X)R
I!)SHlTI1'ERS
@STYLESPBCIl'ICGARAOEOOOR
.
~~J,=,*r~...,
-
1'--
e::f'
':'"~
aJi~l1.
~-~
1...;....1-:.... ...:..
. - , - . -
~~ :~_i~ff?
~"-~~--: ~H:"
~i;~~
~ 1--'- -- -
.. .:::.~ ;....:... ==..::: -:'""?
~-~-
--
---~-
. --
ROO'
FASCIA
LlGFlT LACE sweco
SHINGLES
BOARD .It BATTEN SIDING
TRIM I COLUMNS I ACCENT VENTS
STYUl SPEClF1C f'NTRY DOOR
SITU: SPIiCIflC GAllAGE DOOR
~. ~..
..'l~' "
. .<<J
~
-R.1fe. ,,f
:N'ro'~ ,~'P ~
--htONTELEV-ATI6N "D"- . Ar0'ERICANFA.RJ.mOtlSE
5mBELBMENTs
:~RMMASStNG-,wrmSIMl'LEROOF
. SMQI}THFLAT CONCRE'I'E,TILES
. BlENDED SlinNO.uID.STVCX'O
. VRRnCAi.!;YHlJNG MULTI PANED W\Nbows
'.SHEDROOf"A<XEJ':O'S
. B:12POIl.WARDFAC!NOINTER.'BCl1N(lGAlILE
~., .
i'Y'v,.
'w <lJt
}... r..
... liT:.
~:~,:J.
~~ '. Ji
'r". \,'
", . ..,
(1 ROOF
"11 FASCIA
~I 20/30 SAND srucco
.4' TRIM
,~', Sii'LE SPECIFIC ENTRY DOOR
,-6"SHlITTERS
1]1 sn'U'SPEClF1CGARAGFOOm
I~: STONIi
(Q; WROUGHT [RON
r-:7
~...
"'4.
.....:
,.
FRONT ELEV AnON "C" . CAPE COD
FRONT ELEVATION "A" - TIJSCAN
~eE.l..EMEl'l-rs
'1 STORY StMl'U MASSING
. ~:12MAl:NROOFmCH
. t2,' OVERHANGS
. BLENDED SHINLClE SIDING AND STUCCO
. SMOCTflFl...'TCONCRETE'fTI.ljS
. VPltnCALL Y HUNG MULUONED WINDOWS
. sEUicTED W~DOWS pAIRlttJ
-'~'
PLAN I
STYLEELEMlONTS
. 2 STORY ....;rnHRONGONE STDRY ELEMI'NT
. 4,12 MAIN ROOFrrrCH
. 12"OVHUlANGH
. SIMPLE GAHLE WlTH INTI:RSELTING GABU
'''S''Sl-lAPEDCONCRJJTfTllES
. VERTICALLY H1JNGMUl,TIPAJ-.'ETlWINt)(IWS
.V;POSFDRAFTER'IAlLS
'PLANkT'lPESI.fUTrfRS
LENNAR HOMES
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
Kevin L Crook Architect. Inc.
40980 Ce>'~nty C~nl~r Or., Su;l. 110, Tem..6ul", CA 92591
Phe>ne (951) 719-3420 Fo. (951) 296-6495
TEMEClr'LA. CA
APRIL 17.2006
1360 Reyr>oldsAve Suile 1110 Irvin€'. Co 92S\4
Phon" (94-9) 660-1537, Fa. (949) 6fiO-1589
Websil..; www.klcorcn.com
_,,'.....,... 0' .......,_.,.._~__,..__......~'" _......, ....-.. ,-". "..,...,.
~''''''''''''~'''''-~- ._"' ....-,. ._".......~"-,~ ..,.,.. '" .,.'",..",~,
I;:.
~<~~~::.
"'"
L
--- Jr- .
~ I .....~.
I - - fL;
-....-""" 0 -
WI!!..
'1l
~
!;fl
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
LENNAR HOMES
40980 County Center Dr.> Suitl' 110, r..m..culo. CA 92591
Phnn..' (9",1) 111;;-3420 F"o~: (951) 296-6495
~~~
~
~,~~~2
~--+
~l
. =--
~~lJlATION
''':)r.DrnO'_n...~
n''''l'''''.
"co"t,,,,,,,,,
11"00. fT
2"SQ.FT
~
..,....
lIl<'''''''''"l1M'''''ArF
,_,...,r..>.;."
,"\""
PLAN I
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL 17,2006
r .-.--.... ,-..- - .-..- ,_...... -. - - .-..-..-..-..----..-..-,,---- -,
~\'q~ -
I
l
-~
I
I
I
I
I
CO!
L:JI
~
L2J
l_~~:.?~G~
r:~l----
"
~i ,
, .L _ _J _ _ ____
~'
C"7
II
r~
~'/J-
J'~'MjN I
-r-j
I
--<
1
c
,
~I
I
!
__I
"I
,
,
~I
~
_"__.R ....._..__.._.._...._....._ __......._"'"'.._.A_..~. ~~.,.~
-..-...---....,...-.. ...-.--....-..--.....-.. --.-,....... ...'-
2!\WMl"~
~~IDC
) I I
~ (-::=J flU
' 1"
1 ~~/.
,~~___l.l_:~j 1f \-,
i
ld
c
-",
OJ
-.M"''>
I" .. ,
, ,
..n.
1""\----
~
~
r-I
.- r\ Q1\~
I~ .
1,1=
nl'--
,-
,
-,
.......
nnn-.-f
,
1 __'_ 1
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
B[()RM.J
~
_u~.
Kevin L. Crook Architect. Inc.
1360 Reynolds Ave.. Suite #110 IrviM. Ca. 92614
Phan'1' ('HS) 660-1:>1:17. Fox (94S) 660-1589
Webeite' <lww klcorch~om
LENNAR HOMES
40980 County C~nter Dr., 5~it" 11D, Teme<;:ula, CA 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 Fax: (951) 296-6495
~----
M
I
iJ_
1-
ID-------
-------/
'*
dlnm~
u('=~mmffi-ml u__un__un
._--~
ill]
H3~i
!II
REAR ELEVATION "A". TUSCAN
-.----- ------. ._~
-~-~-----I
mr n
!
i,.NJ
;1'
:1;
~'
~__~i'
-
CI: ROOf
\~ F^SClA
,j, 20110S"'ND~TUr.:CO
(~) TRIM
~) SHUTIERS
foJ STUNE
=
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "AU -1USCAN
1/----
r-
C-.
--... !
~'---""'--
------~-
-_.~~ l
I .
m Jill ItJ'"
m J<[J.Jtti -
\~\
,},
'3"
, \ ,~r:
tBili
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "A" - TUSCAN
PLAN IA
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
~
ROOF
4:12 PITCH UNO.
TEMECULA, CA
APRlL 17,2006
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
1360 ReynoldsA'Ie.. Suite Nl10 Irvine, Ca. 92614
PI-,one (949) 660-1587, 'Fox (949) 660-1589
Websitlll: www.klcarch.com
:;;;:-:''::'~'''::.=;::'-:''''-=-:-:':''::=_''''::::'"':,':..''';;'''"-::-';'=':'::.:''7;,;;,,,;;,-::'':'::
LENNAR HOMES
40980 County Center Or.. Suite '10, hmeculo, (PI 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 Fa~ (951) 296-6495
"I'
~
I
1
I
~
.,; '~1==~l~~
----[-.-1'. (,I_
__ __ _~L'.IllLllill' II
,'I)
,"
REAR ELEV AnON "B" - AMERICAN FARMHOUSE
~~~~~~- I ---
e.~ IJ~I~~
~ J
fljlr------j
n jr=--~
, ~l ir== ~
JL__ ___~__~~____.J --'
c
LEFT SIDE ELEVA nON "8" - AMERlCAN PARMHOUSE
~~~~ ~
[-~-~J~ .,[;( IIIli I ~"
--d-' .' ~
. lIT .f;pf '" ~
I,~....m IfJj3J_
RIGBT SIDE ELEVATION "8" - AMERJiZAN FARMHOUSE
PLAN I B
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
,\PRJL 17,2(106
F)
~~.r;/c- --- - ~
I W i
I '
, .....
Li:
I , ,
I I :
: i :
l ., -'
;1) ROOF
,ll FASClA
J) LlGHTl.-ACE.Sn:CCO
(!, HOFUZONTAL SIDIJ'IG
(3"1 BOARD & BATffiN SIDlNG
1]:1 l1I1M! CQLUMNS I AcalNT VENTS
'1~ SHUTrEl\.S
'81 BRICK
It .......
~
~ ~
U~
I
'"
~
ROOF
5:12 PITCH V.N,D.
Kevin L. Crook Architect. Inc.
t3I::C Reynolds Ave Sui\e #110 Irvine, Co. 92614
Phone (949) 660-1587, Fox (949) Bee 1589
Website: ",,*,,,,krcorch.com
'-,....."" __"_.,,......_-,""'....... _.....~.._.........._._ ~.".M D'.....
_..._.........._,,_,"'-'_. ..._,,__._..........,...'"'..,~ .',"", o~"._" ......
LENNAR HOMES
40980 County Center Dr, Suite 110. Temeculo, CA 92591
Pho"w (951) 719-3420 Fox, (951) 296-6495
I I
I.~.------!~tj
I.~__ _d
,
~
ml
sma~, I 4J
i==lI~II'--------
~_~_J~ ~
REAR ELEV A nON "C" . CAPE COD
~btt]m
,p
I}I
'I~I
----m-----ft~l!!I
LEFT SIDE ELEV A nON "C'- . crAPE COD
I~~
lrl~f~ B' ~
(f)
I
'"'
RlGHT smE ELEVATION "C" - CAPE COD
PLAN 1 C
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL 17, 2006
\~)
f'~_m~-
, ,
i~
I....
I
I
Ii
I
I ,
m___ ~
~'.JI
____n____ .....
o I .--e:
~
....
ROOF
5:12 PITCH U.N.O,
'J) ROOF
~, FMClA
en L10rr LACE STUCCO
(i", SHINGlE.~
ct BOARD & T1ATTEN SIDING
r~) TIUM I COLUMNS I ACCFtlT VF.NTS
i'r)SIIUTTERS
Kevin L. Crook Architect Inc.
1350 R"ynold~ Ave.. Suite Hl1 0 Irv,o.,!, Ca. 92614
Phone (949) 660-1587, Fox (949) 1060-1589
Websi!e: www.klcarch.c()m
-""-~ -.-,,-..-..-.-.......- ........~......_~-- .'_. ..,....-'Q ",....
__.........__.._,....,....__ ..._,__._...._...~_~".. _._ 0.'..- ~ ,,,_
~
..~
.
f..'
~hY.>..(...
." ,.J
)(1)
~..
t_
\0. <
'P"'\ '>l
~-$.~
~'~~~~'~'
,~~-~;-
~"!I'Il
",-,")":0 .
.....
~
i='
I ~;:."~-
....",.-"... ....',
..........
......-.............
--
_,_J_
L~:~ . . ?~
- .._I~~
ber= . -
. ....~.::~
!; I:1D ~ ~..;: I
~:il~
~-~~
~'~ll:_
FRONT ELEVATION "B" - AMERICAN FARMHOUsE
STYl.l! ELEMENTS
. SIMPUll'LAN roRM MASSING WTIll SlMJ'LE ROOF DESIGN
. PORCHWlTHOOUBLE'lVOODCOLUMNS
. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF
. 12" OVERHANGS
. SMOOTII FLA. T CONCRETE TILES
. BLENDED SIDING AND STUCCO
. VERTlCALLYlruNGMUUTPANEDWlNDOWS
. BlUCJ(ACCENTS
'.':'~':-i'
~",.~-:.~.
.": -.of
.,..,~ ,.'
~/', ',." ...~:~?l~
."'" ~~;,... I.. .
~ ..""', .,
.~ .o+l< ~! -
.j,.~ . ........
.~' .'~'''' .-
.~1#i1....' ,..,
.,... .1-
",. ,
~.~/.~ '
~'.r"" . .$;;.
-'11;;" ' ~..
~~ r:! ""I
'1--! ~
-<,
m-
i!l PASCtA
(t umrr LAce STlTCCO
@.i/lHINOUS
(!l BOAlID ~ BA't1llrt 'SW1NO
@ TlUMIOOLUMNSIACCENT~
IJ) STYLE'8PBCIPlCENTR.VOOOR
(~SHlJ1iBRS.
@ STYLB SPECIFIC GARAO!! DOOR
FRONT ELEVATION "C" - CAPE COD
S~E ELEMENTS
. 2 STORY SlMl'LE MASSINO
. 5:12 MAlN ROOF PITCH
. SIMPLEFORWAfU) FACIl'<'G INTERSECTlNG GABLE
. 12"OVf.RHANOS
. BLENDBD SIDNLGE SIDJNG AND srucco
. SMoont FLAT CONCRETE Tn.P..S
. VEIlTICALL Y HVNO MULUONI'.D WINDOWS
. SIlLECJ'ED WfNI)Ows PAIRED
. PORCH WlTIIWOOD COLUMNS
PLAN 2
''''"..
,~ ...,v
j,. .t-;.
5~:..1~.
~~: ~i
':;0 ~,
t""'
I
" I
~~
.'"
nl .""V,~
~.)~~..... .~:
.....l~..
. ~,
, ."
-r-~.'.:fl"""*"~.'",?,
\D ROOF
(ZJI'ASClA
'J) 2~O SANDS'It.ICCO
(4)Tlllhl
~) STYlJlSPHClPlCBNnt.yDQOR
@SHUJ'l'lW
,'1) STYt.E SPfiCIFlC GARAGIl DOOR
(j-1STON:E
:9) SXJ'OSEDRMTER TAILS
FRONT ELEVATION "A" - TUSCAN
STYLE ELEMENTS
. Z STORY WITH STRO/'lG ONE STORY ~.LEMENl'
. 4:\lMAlNROOFI'\lffi
. 12" OVERHANGS
. SIMl'LE GABLE wtTl-IlNTERSOCT1NG GABLE
. "s" SHAPED CONCRETE TILES
. VERTICALLY HUNG M\JLLlQNEDWlNDOWS
. EXroSED RAFTER TAlLS
LENNAR HOMES
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
40980 County Center Or., Suite 110, Temecula, CA 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 fCl<: (95"1) 296 6495
TEMECULA, CA
APRlL 17,2006
.,
1360 Reyrv;Ms !>.ve.. Sllite #1\0 ',rv\ne, Ca. ~2614
Phone (949) 660-1587. Fax (949) 550-1589
Websile: WWW.klcorch.com
....'_._~-_.._-_...__....._- ......~......_......_...._..........-.."
-.....,.........--....,....-"- ..._._..-.-....._""'~.._....._, ,_...~ ~_.
.~
~
g~~~~ u--r
1
~
C hlMm
~
c
5=)~,'
I
(l .
&.L___:~
-,
'rif~~!:I~
l!Q!.
~/
,~,
I
I 'J."r
L ~'
~
'~ifsl,'W
~I'),
\ \~)
\1"1..'
-,
l)(g--"
1"""fE:]2> ~
, 1/(
... -
--.::::
,.
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
LENNAR HOMES
40980 County Cenler Dr, Suite 110, To'!rneculo, CA 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 F"a.. (951) 295-6495
~
.AREA TABULA nON
~..."
nR'Sl"",""
:;(O""r'l,,",
IOTA,.'
''''''SO,n
~
,814,0,'1"
HN~o>l'f>l'r"""n"AO'
l""=E-
'.j,."."
PLAN 2
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
APRlL 17, 2006
\'-<l"MlH
,,~
lW!oll~ -:
L- ,
I
or - - .-."-..-..-..-..-..-..---.-..----.-..---- - -.--.--,-
~
~
~
"
~!
C:7
l-llAYGllAm
"....".~'
I
I
I
,
I :
1---'-- _._~
I _________nn___
I
I
I
~I
..m--::_m
"I
iI'
ll.::_""____.m__.
I
Ll-'l'MlN..
,
L
~I
:01
I
~
~
n
P
D
~
~.
~
~~
:; : ~
I ~:
!) _~nmJm-
1 ~ -------~y~C\
;i~r
"'" l.t. -;i
D<TR' "
--~-.-:_-
,', "
xi
l'
flo.Mlt.\
,~
n=,m
,-
i.Q.[
.
,
,
""""{)
~
___uu,
I
J
~
UVlNG
~
-
I [ \ 'i
n-l
...mJ - i~----
I
,
,
.
II.:
..J____<
fiRST fLOOR PLAN
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
1360 Reynolds A",." Suite #110 Irvine, Co 92614
Phone (949) 660-1587. Fax (9~9) 560-1589
Website: www.klcorchCDrY',
-. "" .-..... -~ .,- ~- ............... - ,,""...~.. '--. -"_. .,,~ -.- - '" ,'"'..
-.........---.'-....-'" ...-..........-.--..-.,..............." -...............
LENNAR HOMES
~ ----
1________ 0 -=------ CD I
& ~@I.m~~_Q)
m--lliWrn--~---~---------------C _m__.___m :---
REAR ELEVATION "A". TUSCAN
H
~
C ;m. " , . . .." " " , .m"
1I~ CD i Em mm _
un:"" ':":""m_ _~ 1IIrIlt ' nl~_; ~ ~
i.-III ~
(j)
I
CD
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION orA". TUSCAN
(j)
----~I
CD
RIGHT SIDE ElEVATION "An. TUSCAN
PLAN 2A
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
40980 County C~nter Dr" Suite 110, Terneeulo. CA 92591
Phone: (951) 719-~420 Fg.: (951) 296-6495
TEMECULA, CA
APRlL \7, 2006
m
i ~ I. II
I---~---~ ~
-~_/ ~
~ 0 I
...
~ .
...
~
~ ,
",__1,.1 ~jJ
ROOF
4:12 PITCH V.N.Q.
CD ROOF
ill fASCIA
(D1OJJOSANDSruCCO
@)TRlM
CD SHUTTERS
@STOHE
r:D WROUGHTlR.ON
(j)
Kevin L Crook Architect, Inc.
1360 Rey~old, ^ve.. Suite '110 IN\ne, Ca, 926H
Phone (9.9) 660-1587, 'fa. {949} 660-1589
Website: www.klo:orch.com
...,__,,__,,_........___.__ _...R....__._...__.........
-..-...-...-....,--.. ...-.--.-.....-...................,--..-
;i;
'9 ..--:.;~
~ ........-"'-<~--
.--: . ': .
.~. -~..........
:fJLJ I.m IJ~
--- J~lIff- no =:"1__OJ___~_no_m___ ---------- ~-----
_ .1
iD
REAR ELEV AnON "B" . AMERICAN F ARM:HOUSE
k~,
I . -~II ,II
l OJ ~II
----------=-==---~L I '
.
jCD
II
._ ~OJ
~~~I
._~~~
'm 1..[11. I.
I~~
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "B". AMERlCAN FARMHOUSE
I
~l - ~I! ~l !II
fp.jlll
F/ J
d~
- lW(OJ
OJ
7'
jl
CD
!
RiGHT SIDE ELEVATION "B". AMERlCAN FARMHOUSE
PLAN 2B
LENNAR HOMES
409Bo?~oun:y(c'")ter Dr.. Suite 110, Temeeulo, CA 92591
one. 951 719-3420 ro~: (951) 296-6495
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA. CA
APRIL 17, 2006
I-I
~ ~
r
I
I.
~ ""~~ I
~ /"Z~
~, ~
~
II ~
r:,~I~~
II ~ II ~ I
~ilil\-.J'
ROOF
5:12 PITCH U.N.O.
~
<D ROOF
@FASClA
ill LIGHT LACE STUCCO
@HORlZONTALSlDlNG
<!l TRlM I COLUMNS .' ACCENT VENTS
@lSHUTTERS
C!>BRlCK
.
Kevin L Crook Architect, Inc.
1360 Reynold,Ave.. Suite 1110 Irvine Co 92614
P~one (949) 6~0-\587. Fax (949) '660':""589
Webs'te: "''''''.~learth.tom
::.:.:.-:-:";,-:...-::.~;;::-.:"'...:= ':':::=_",,:=;.":,':,,"';;':.:;";=~:,,'7=--"':':':.::
LENNAR HOMES
~
~0 ~.
rLlFEfEJI lm~ BB '"
.-C) ~~
-----~E--~-m---m--nnm--m.
.
REAR ELEVATION "C". CAPE COD
....bL
I
~ 10 I
1 m ~m m~
-----~ .mJ m m--;:
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "e" - CAPE COD
j)
o
-m1l1i'mD
InrTlQb
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "C" . CAPE COD
PLAN 2C
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
40980 County Center Dr., Suite 110. Temecula, CA 92591
Phone; (951) 719-3420 Fax: (951) 296-6495
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL 17,2006
';~I
'" ..."" ,~f
I .... /~
.... Ii
II
II
II ... 1 ~ ~
:1 ...
....
.... I
II
ROOF
5: l2 P1TCH V.N,Q.
CD ROOF
(6lFASCIA
<D LlGHTLACESruCCO
@SHINGLESlDlNG
<D BOARD &0 BATTEN SIDING
@)TRlMICOLUMNSIAC'CENTVENTS
IJ)SHUTTERli
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
lJ60ReynoldsAve.. Suite 1110 Irvine, Ca. 92614
Phone (949) 660-1587, Fox (949) 660-1589
Website: www.klcarch.com
_C__..__.._R_.._.........__ __R....__........___.......
_"_"'___'_L__.. ..._.__........................_.....,__..._
...
~ :~
.\I'.""""~"
'.l.~', .~;
.,. ~ ..~~
Q)aooF
OJ'^""
CD LlGHT U,CI!: STUCCO
@SKIN<lL.ES
(5"IOO,Q\D&BAlifNS[DIN(I
(6) TRIM/COLUMNS I A(.'C'l!l'rt Vl:NTS
(1) STYLI! !l'ECCFIC ENTRY DOOR
,~iSH\..l'T1U.S
,j'L STYli SPECtf\CGhlU.Gli. DOQ\l.
~'--.::,~-
r --- ~;:-~
___A_III.: .......:.=.--1
~ -'~:--,-:-:
, =
- ---_.-
- - ~r'f:=r::.~!
~.~_~l~E
,t_illli~,-,-,.
~----:::='.="..::----:-:=---=---~. .
f. -'~ ,
J'~-'~_: __~____u....__
~.till ... ._~
II r!J
\
.fi f ',J"',. " .,
\' ~ '(,'r . -, ~.
.:1 ,~. ~l
.~ ;~ '~
~tt '"
....""--
FRONT ELEVATION "8" - AMERICAN FARMHOUSE
...:.~.: ~i.'
".~-~.
... ~ . i
.i:.<l:.. .
~/ '. ";:~'/
~:. ,.
.~~..
....~.'
(1'1 ROOF
Ii) FASCiA
(~) LIGHT LAC!] STUCCO
(-!\ SHINGLES
.ti BOARn&BATIF.NSIDlNG
@ TRIM/COLUMNS I ACCENT VENTS
,'1) STYLE SPECIFIC ENTRY DOOR
(8i SHU1TERS
('11 STYLE SPECIFIC UAR^GE DOOR
STYLE ELEMENTS
;SiMPi:E PlAN FORM MASSING 'oVlTI-I SIMPLIl ROOF
. 12" OVERHANGS
. SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE mIlS
" BLENDED SIDING AND STIJeCO
. YER1K'ALL Y !lUNG MUL n PA}/ED WlNVOWS
. SHED ROOF ACCENTS
~ '"" ., 'L , , I' '''!" ",' """!,'l!'
.;~~~~ .. ., · ::.J
:t!h'tzk fll, ,."
~._~~~
.'. ~~-
il; ROOF'
!2\l'ASCtA
c31201305.o.NOSTliCCU
'41 TRIM
~ STYLE SPfCIFICE1'<lRYOOOR
(6) SHUTrnRS
l~ STYLE SPIOClFlC GARA(iE DOOR
(8) STONE
-r'~...:~',,:
FRONT ELEV AnON "C" ~ CAPE COD
FRONT ELEVATION "A" - TUSCAN
STYLE ELEMENTS
. 2 STORY SIMPLB MASSING
. S,12 MAIN ROOF FITCH
. 7.12 FORWARDF~CINGlI'!TERSECTINClGABLE
. 12" OVE1UlANClS
. BLENDED SHlNUlE SIDINO AND STUCCO
. SMOcrt'U FLAT CONCRETE TILES
. VERTIC,4LL Y HU\'lG MULLIONED WINDOWS
. SELECTEDWINOOWSPAlltED
PLAN 3
STYLE BLEMENTS
~ 5.0(1.). Wlill STRONG ONE STORY ELEMENT
. 4-12MA!NROOFPITCH
. ]2. OVERHANGS
. SIMPLE mp WITH IN1CRSECTING GABLE
. "S" SHAPED CONCRETE IlLES
. VERTICALLY HUNG MULLIONED \VlNQOWS
. EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS
LENNAR HOMES
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
Kevin 1. Crook Architect, Inc.
40980 County Center Dr., Suite 110, Temeculo, CA 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 Fax: (951) 296-6495
TEMECULA, CA
APRil 17,2006
1360 Reynolds Aw~.. Suite #110 Irvine, Co 92614
Phone (949) 660-1587, Fo~ (949) 6'10-1589
Website; www.klcarchcam
... ""--'.,....,~--,,_...........""'"""''''',.''"... ....'..,~...._-_..~....'~.,-
""~,,"'''''d'''__,,,-, ,,~_~. ..._.__M..."_....,...~,'.'.,~'...,..".. .~~.
i',
Ii
H
I;
.=:1
!lle) i~J.Y
JJ /~
, ~
iI
."
......
'---~-t
~
o
'I
I
I
I
l::IQ-,,tt
. L"" 'L~ r
~~.'
'i....'"
1..>
I BEDRM.4
T:; """
~
~,~!:
"""
-
l
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
LENNAR HOMES
~0980 County C/!nt~r Dr., Suite' 10. Temeculo. CA 92591
Phone: (951\ 719-3420 Fa~: (951) 296-6495
3
AREA TABULATION
.Q'l'!m:Irn>O........
nR? fl.OO~
Sl:OOI<OFL(>;>'-
101A(_
"'"~" ,..,
~
IOJI ~O. n
~':!I'~...r'
1.11.''''''''''[
IO'SOrT
PLAN 3
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL 17. 2006
I --,_.._,,-,,-,,- - .-,.-..-..-..-..-,,-..-,..-,,- - -. -,..-,,-.,-.- - .., -\
, .
,
t-H".Idlli,
,
,
I
,
~
H_'L
M
,
____.l::(I'MIJI-'-1
[.1 f;1
<-J Ie.. ~
I~
~
""J
.~ "'"
Sll\O!
~ ~~.~\
]~~!;~~G[. 'r ~~1J
ILVI~~"---:'-
o'~ II "~:~
:~
---~
~
,~
'-1-"'7.---
L_o
".;~?~~
~_I~
~~ ~
~?A
rh' -
I ~
I . ~ '
~"-; _ .....:JL-
....
,
J. _"_"_.._.._"_.
FIRSTFLOQR PLAN
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
1360 Reynolds Ave.. Suite #110 I",ine, Co 92614
Pho~e (949) 660-1587. Fo~ (949) 660 1589
Website; ",,,,,,,.~Icorch,com
51
~ ~
r--
~I
,
,
,
,
,
,-----.---1--
,
,
"
.
-- ~
_. _._w......~_,,_.._.._..-,..,..__ ..._~~,.'_ ,_.,~..~'~_ ~.. ~,,"
_..~.......,""'_........_~ .~_.__.-...........,..-........,.., '--"'.~ ,,-
LENNAR HOMES
40960 COUrlt)l Center Dr., Suite 110, Temecula, CA 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 Fax: (951) 296-6495
i ~
.cfJ~~~' '"I ~"J#~~ 0 '.0 1
-WW==-ITJDJ.-.-----m--.
.
REAR ELEVATION "A" - TUSCAN
~
JI FE
ce::::::::
.-------EE-----------
~
o
~
------
ale
Lu
o
cmm
';!)
~
.
_~_~___________ .___ ._dn_____u____,
,
,
,
,
,
,
-~---
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "A" - TUSCAN
~Q)
~IDIDIEH1llllf'~ ~ IE
yw . ~.'1I~ ~~I _~--.._------------m--- OJ_I--~----
~~~~
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "A". TUSCAN
PLAN 3A
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL 17,2006
------':'!'"_....
CD ROOF
C!JFASC1A
CD 20/10 SAND STUCCO
@.JTRIM
ClJ STYLE SPEClFIC ENTRY DOOR
@SHUTIERS
CD STONE
@EXPOSEDRAfTERTAILS
r-;;;::-l
]
~
....
ROOF
4:12 PITCH V.N.a.
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
1350 Reynolds Ave.. Suite'110 Irvine, Co. 92614
Phone (949) 660-1SB7, Fax (949) 660-1589
Website: www.klcorch.com
-,--~-_.._.._..-........_- --......--.-...--.........
-.,.....,---.-. --.. ...-.--.--.......................'''''''-..-
LENNAR HOMES
40960 County Center Dr., Suite 110, Temeculo, CA 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 Fox: (951) 296-6495
r ~
_llli~------.- 0
~. . I
------11=-----.----nS-----------
_ ._ _---::JL..
REAR ELEV A IroN "8" . AMERICAN FARMHOUSE
/7 ~ ~~~~
~. II ~ em~E10
'I 0 "I'
---! -------- --------------j _ in----------- 1 '
I ID i -< ~
- I i
.--~
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "B" - AMERICAN FARMHOUSE
~-<~0 ~~
~."~ffifj(!I .
~~I~lmU' I e' ____n____~____n___=nl--~--
RlGHT SIDE ELEV A IroN "8" . AMERlCAN FARMHOUSE
PLAN 3B
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL 17,2006
.....
Ii
,~
1~~l~1
ROOF
5:12 PITCH V.N.a.
CD ROOF
C6JfASClA
m LIGHT LACE STUCCO
G) HORlZONTAL SIDING
(I) BOARD&BATTENSlDING
@ TRIM I COLUMNS I ACCENT VENTS
(!) STILE SPECIfIC ENTRY DOOR
@ SHUTTERS
Kevin 1. Crook Architect. Inc.
1360 Reynold! Ave.. Suite 1110 Irvine, Ca. 92614
Phone (949) 660-1567, 'Fox (949) 660-1569
Web$ite: www.klcorch.com
_c__"-__.._.._...............__ __n....__._...__~n..,..
-".-....---.-,--.. ...-.--.-..............-........-,...-..-
LENNAR HOMES
~~5~
C~~ ~I 0 0
--~ _m ---, 13H[ HE 1m
pp p jrt1~ --I-LJ IJ nm_Q
REAR ELEV A TlON "e" - CAPE COD
ro~
~.
mR:riR
m~ .... .... ..... mmm
(j)
(j)
-rmm
1
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "C". CAPE COD
RIGHT SlOE ELEVATION "C". CAPE COD
PLAN 3C
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
40960 County Center Or" Suite 110, Temeculo. CA 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 Fo~: (951) 296-6495
TEMECULA, CA
APRlL 17,2006
~--:I
~~~i
.._~___._ J .....,
~, ...,
1, :: ...:
- ........
ROOF
5:12 PITCH U.N.O
CD ROOF
Q)FASClA
Q) L1GHTLACESTIJCCO
@SH1NGLES
0) nOARD& BATTEN SIDING
@ TRIM I COLUMNS I ACCENT VENTS
CD STYLE SPEClflC ENTRY DOOR
@ SHUTTERS
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
1360 Reynolds ""ve.. Suite 1110 Irvine, Co. 92614
Phorle (949) 660-1587, Fo~ (949) 660-1589
Websit...: www.klcorch.com
...,--~--,,_.._..__....._- --~_..__._.~-_._....
_......._..._._l__.. ..._.__.__..~_.._.............,__..._
Q) ROOf
i!ll'MiClA
(!) LlORT UCEl stucco
@TRIM
CD ST'{Ll! S~\!C[FlC RNTtlY oooR
@""'"."
(!J STYLI!SI'SCII'ICOARA,DttiooR
---"-'"
-_.-=-'-..:--==---
'~g{~"'" _..--~._-
~~~~ '.I"."l
.}'. If,.::
~,I'jlW.,~ ",
.,;;1 I
~, ,
~.~I, .
liif'"~'..
'"
~~.
,"""! ,
....:... .........
mrr'~~~
.. .", Jf~
. . J.:' ~
". "'''J''':; ',.,. ",,"" -'-'I' .,r ", h-
, D ~'(
t. ~
~ ' 'f
l . .~1
~ ~
~---- ~,..........,...; ....... ~-
nO"' ._" 7'""""". ......
'"'----.J
FRONT ELEVATION "D" - ITALlANATE
\' ~..
"~>l\" ~"
I)' ROOF
if) FASCIA
;J) L10lIT LACE STUCCO
'4) S1UNGLES
i~) BOARD & SA TIEN SIDINO
(t, TRIM I COLUMNS. I ,',.CCENT VENTS
6) STYLESPIKII'ICEN11I.YlX)()R
ii) SJ{UTfERS
(2") STYl.E SPECIFIC GARAOE DOOR
STYlE ELEMENTS
. 2 STORY WITH STRONO ONE STORY EJ..EMENT
. MAIN HIP ROOF W1TII MINOR INTERSElCTING HlPROOFS
'4,lZMAINP1TCH
'STI,JCCOEAV1!$
. "S"SI!APEDCONCRETEmES
. VERTICALLY HUNO WtNDOWS
. SELECTED WINDOWS PAIRED
. ARCHED TOP ACCF.NTWINDOWS
~
~.,.
...
(J'~
<
~
, ,.
~'
,
FRONT ELEv A 'nON "e" "CAPE COD
STYLE ELEMENTS
. 2 STORY SIMPLE MASSING
. S:12 MAIN ROOF I'ITCH
.7:12 FOJtWA.RDFAClNGINTERSEC11NGOABLE
.12"OVEJUtANGS
. BLENDED SHlNLGE SIDINO AND s:rucco
. SMOOnJ Fl.A T CONCRETE Tn.ES
. VERnCALLYtlUNOMULLJONED"WlNDOWS
. 5ELECTED WlNDOW5 PAIRED
PLAN 4
LENNAR HOMES
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
40980 County Center Dr.. Suite 1 '0, Tf.rneCIJ!<l. C/l. 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 Fax: (951) 296-6495
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL ]7, 2006
",,---. .:: I .:
~-
0;.;
-~~-I
__ - _... I
-, ,..~.. ..,-.
.- ,--, -- -. .....-1
=-----r-= ~~, _
1- --.-----
,- -- - ....
-- -----"-
I~i ~+~:!::13:
r~. I --. --ii]
- .::. == . ::~
I""'" ,--...~I ....=
-----------
b ...=<==-~
___R__
.--.--
E==:~':;;;;;;::.E=~~.="---
Iii ROOF
,).") FASCIA
Ci', 2tJI)l>~ANl1>.TUC(O
'4-' TRIM
,S) STYLE SPECltlC ENTRY DO()R
(.6) 5HllTTERS
,i ST'r1ESPIXiFICC,ARAm:tx)(
(~, SrONf-.
FRONT ELEV A nON "A" - TUSCAN
STYLEELEM"fNTS
. 2 ~y Wlnl S'TRONG ONE STORY ELEMENT
. H2 MAIN ROOF PITCH
. 12" OYEIU-JANGS
. SIMrLE HIP WITH lNTERSECIDlG OABLF
. "5'" SHAPED CONCRETE TILES
. VERTICALLY HUNG MULTI PANED WINPOWS
. ExPOSED RAmR TAILS
Kevin L Crook Architect, Inc.
1:l60Reynold!lAven Suite #110 Irvine. Ca. 92614
Phone (949) 660-1587. Fox (949) 660-1589
Website: www.l.dcarch.com
""',"""-......-,-,...-...-....-.......-.-.... _......"'".~.""_._.."~,~-"-,,
.,...'''...'''''_...._....''__R ......,,__,_......'"'"' "'.......,.~....,"'"".".,," ......
---L
"~,
Lt.,.., ,. II"
~~,~','~"~
~
~
~.....j
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
LENNAR HOMES
40980 Co..."ty Cllnter Dr., Suite 110. T...meculc, CA 92591
Phcne' (851) 719-3420 Fo:<. (951) 296-5495
AREA TABULA nON
'..""I"Tt"""'n.......
"",rrLOOH- '''OSc'fT
,['0"""00" ,.....9.<T
1"'...._ 1011:\11."
,""",,,,,mONl'TJ<>A"'"
J EWGAA~t 7r!5~. 'T.
PLAN 4
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL 17, 2006
r'-"-"-"-"-'---'-"-"-'-'-"-'-"-'-"-"-"-"--.-. -,--.-.
jl'-<l'MlN
~[2J
~
,
,
r-'I
LL__/
--~n::__
,
,
l--'~
4~'-<l"
,
I] I
~':" EL
L)I4l~!J
01 \
1!:!J!.ill! ::
'lh'
~( ~ ~ ~'
~ il U
z~t::J": J" \.\
"'"
[.:0\ - \ -'. , ~-::::]
- _r~~ 1=--11
,- r- _ @ "'"
=D
~
~ l~-I
~o:"l---lfJ~f __m --
nlNl~'G
~
~-
'"
~
;~~~~';'('"
/:i
-~
~
~
-\"
~,
m~~O ~-,.r
1---1-..>(/,
=~,
~
---'--
I
- . .~
-~j
I
I
____J
I
.J ___ __ _ _
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
1360 Reynolds Ave., S\Jlte #110 Irvine, Co. 9;>614
Pl'1one (949) 660-1567. Fox (949) 660-15B9
Website: www.klccrch.com
:~l
,I
"
"'
I
~'.{l"M~
i
I
!.I
::1
...J _________
...,--" --",-~_......-.-._- ..._......_,_......"..._~"....
-.........---.-,--.. '~-'--'--".._.""""'''''''-' ""'....." ,-
LENNAR HOMES
40980 CQunty Center Or., Suite 110, remeculc, CA 92591
Phon'" (951) 719-3420 Fax: (951) 296-6495
~~
. .- ,J#f=+l "'m '"aJ
~
~m
- . . . . . .
[iJ[iJ
aJ
llJl I IUJ
~~--. .
REAR ELEVATION "A". TUSCAN
~
------
-~
i~.T
III
i~
EE
B m
I
aJ
(1)
~. . . . . .
~
":'::~.^.~"">-
mmmmm
B r-----ill [O@'.------------:-------------.---m
-----------I
m
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "A". TUSCAN
PLAN 4A
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL 17,2006
,~
.'--
I ~~(
ROOF
4: 12 PITCH V.N.O.
.
Q) ROOf
(J)FA.SCI>\
q) 2OIJOSANDSTVCCO
@TIlJM
CV STIlE SPECIfiC BLRY DOOR
@ SHVTIEIl.S
(!)srONE
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
1360 Reynold' Ava.. Suite 6110 Irvine, Ca. 92614
Phone (949) 660-1587, Fo. (949) 660-1589
Wetl,ite: "'....klcorch.com
...,..._..__,,_..__...__.__ __R....__........_'*'*.....
_........___._...._. ..._.__._....._......_..._....'__k_
LENNAR HOMES
409BO COllnty Center Dr., Suite 110, Temeculo, ell 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 Fo~: (951) 296-6495
~
~
~~
~~
'"
0. W _ 1~0
III TlDJ__m~mH_---
.
r;;
-
I..
REAR ELEVATION "Bot - ITALIANATE
/
I
~
o
~
--. f'"
LillL
b ~
. '"
@i[ilIIU
!:Ii
ill
,-""-,
o
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION "B" - ITAUANATE
~
""--"4
;~llJ~m w~
'_ i_ill itiitt!mmm~ ..'
Q)
RlGHr SIDE ELEVATION "sn - lTALlANA IE
PLAN 4B
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL 17,20(l6
ROOF
5: 12 PITCH UN.a.
.
CD ROOF
(DFASC1A
C)lIGHTLACESTLlCC'CI
@)TRIM
~ STYlESPECIFlCENTfl,YDOOIl.
@SHlrrTER.S
rJj WROUGHT1ROt'l
Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.
1350Reyno\d!lAve..Suite'110Irvine,Cc.92614
Phone (949) 660-1587, Fo~ (949) 650-1589
Web!lile: www.kl<::orchcom
_''''''_~__f._..____...._.... ...........__._...__..~....
-........--.--.-.--. ..-.--.--..--................"..-.-
LENNAR HOMES
40980 County Center Dr., Suite 110, Temecula, CA 92591
Phone: (951) 719-3420 Fa~; (951) 296-6495
I ~~,
I~~
--m.j=JllTJ !}--------- --
- 11- -.
REAR ELEVATION "e" . CAPE COD
.
~
I~
1
0)~~0)
~ l'~'"
m
0'
@
----------n-----------1
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION "e" . CAPE COD
PLAN 4C
"HARVESTON 3"
BARRINGTON
TEMECULA, CA
APRIL 17,2006
-~- ...
~=
,~
~ ~
ROOF
5: 12 PITCH V.N.a.
CD ROOF
I1l FASCIA
C!l LIGHT LACE STUCCO
@)SHINGLES
(2) BOARD "'-BATIEN SlOlNG
@ TRIM I COLUMNS I ACCENT VENTS
(J) STYLE SPECIFIC ENTRY DOOR
@SHlJTTERS
@STONE
Kevin L. Crook Architect. Inc.
1360 Reynolds Ave.. Suite 1110 Irvine. Co. 92614
Phone (949) 660-1587, "Fax (949) 660-1589
Website: ",ww.klcareh.eom
..ct..._..__.._.._..__.....__ _...n....__._...__.........
-........---..."..-.. ...-.--.-..............-..........,--..-
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-~
G;\PJanning\200S\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington. Home Product Rev\Planning\STAFF REPORT.doc?
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA 05-0378, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PRODUCT
REVIEW) FOR 130 DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES
(BARRINGTON), ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DATE STREET,
ADJACENT TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE
INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND DATE STREET IN THE
HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN
Section 1.
No. PA05-0378, in
Development Code.
Matthew Fagan representing Lennar Homes, filed Planning Application
a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Section 2. Planning Application No. PA05-0378 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA05-0378 on May 17, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter.
Section 4. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission Hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No.
PA05-0378 subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning
Application PA05-0378 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code.
Section 5. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal
Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City;
The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Low Medium Density Residential
(LM) land use designation standards contained in the City's General Plan, Development
Code, and the Harveston Specific Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as
conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development
proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), and fire and building codes.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare;
The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking,
circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to
protect the health and safety of those living and working in and around the site. The
project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with
G:\Planning\200S\PA05-0378 Harveston UI Barrington - Home Product Rcv\Planning\Resolulion with Sections.docl
all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the
development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety and welfare.
Section 6. Environmental Comoliance. A Notice of Determination for Planning
Application No. PA05-0378 was prepared per the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines Section 15162. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the
proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Determination will
be issued in compliance with CEQA Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR. The previously approved
EIR was prepared for the Harveston Specific Plan.
Section 7. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves
the Application PA05-0378, all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific
conditions set forth on Exhibit A. attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference
together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Resolulion with Sections.docZ
Section 8. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 17th day of May 2006.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Resolution with Sections.doc3
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Resolution with Sections doc4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PAOS-0378
Project Description:
A Development Plan to construct 130 detached single
family homes, on the north side of Date Street, adjacent
to the northeast corner of the intersection of Ynez Road
and Date Street in the Harveston Specific Plan
Assessor's Parcel No.
916-410-003 through 007
MSHCP Category:
N/A per Development Agreement
DIF Category:
N/A per Development Agreement
TUMF Category:
N/A per Development Agreement
Expiration Date:
May 17, 2006
May 17, 2008
Approval Date:
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00)
for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination with a
DeMinimus Finding for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public
Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within
said 48-hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of
failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
,
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
2
Planning Department
2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The perrnittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; othelWise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
6. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest
7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation
measures identified within the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific
Plan, and the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program thereof.
8. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the City or other regulatory
or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with
applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary
permits and approvals for the project.
9. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors
and materials contained on file with the Planning Department, or as amended herein. Any
deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of
Planning. Staff may elect to reject the request to amend or substitute materials and colors,
in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an
appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
3
10. Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment
Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City's right-of-way, and
Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department.
11. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site.
12. Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In
order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24'
maximum.
13. All lots shall be built in accordance with the Site Plans labeled as "Elevations".
14. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
4
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Drafl COAs.doc
5
Planning Department
15. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
G:\Planning\200S\PAOS-0378 Harvestonlll Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
6
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
7
Planning Department
16. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review.
17. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays
18. Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model
Home complex permit
19. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
20. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other ex1ernally mounted utility
equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department
21. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. A three-foot clear zone shall be
provided around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department Utilities shall be
grouped together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an
after-thought Planting beds shall be designed around utilities. All light poles shall be
located on the landscape plans and not conflict with trees.
22. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval with the landscape
construction plans, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to
assure proper grow1h and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the
property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape
maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carryout the detailed program.
23. Landscape plans for front yards, slopes and common lots, to include a plan for perimeter or
"community" walls/fences, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning
Oirector prior to the issuance of building permits for the project
24. A landscape maintenance program for all association maintained areas shall be submitted
for approval with the landscape construction plans, which details the proper maintenance of
all proposed plant materials to assure proper grow1h and landscape development for the
long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided
to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carryout the detailed
program.
25. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Utilities shall be grouped together in
order to reduce intrusion. Planting beds shall be designed around utilities. All light poles
shall be located on the landscape plans and shall not conflict with trees.
G:\Planning\2D05\PAOS-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
8
26. Wall and fence plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director
prior to the issuance of building permits for the project.
27. Provide a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (fresh air
intake) for all homes facing Ynez Road and Date Street. Fresh intake ducts at these homes
should be based on the Uniform Building Code (UBC) requirements that state "in lieu of
exterior openings for natural ventilation, a mechanical ventilating system may be provided.
Such a system shall be capable of providing two air changes per hour with minimum outside
fresh air requirements.
28. Provide standard upgraded windows with a Sound Transmission (STC) rating 27 or higher
for all first floor windows on homes facing Date Street or Ynez Road.
29. Homes facing Date Street and Ynez Road should be provided with weather-stripped solid
core exterior doors and exterior wall/roof assembles should be free of cut outs and
openings.
30. All window and door assemblies used throughout the project shall be free of cut outs and
openings and shall be well fitted and well weather-stripped.
31. Provide exterior walls with a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 46.
Typical walls with this rating will have 2X4 studs or greater, 16" o.c. with R-13 insulation, a
minimum 7/8" exterior surface of cement plaster and a minimum interior surface of '12"
gypsum board.
32. Provide roof/ceiling system utilizing minimum Y2' plywood sheathing that is well sealed to
form a continuous barrier with minimum R-19 batt insulation in the joist cavities.
33. Construct a six-foot high noise barrier for lots facing Ynez Road and Date Street.
34. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
c. Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans.
d. One copy of the approved grading plan.
e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
I. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
g. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map.
h. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Aev\PJanning\Draft COAs.doc
9
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
i. Automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground
mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property
for:
1. Front yards and slopes within individual lots prior to issuance of building
permits for any lot(s).
2. All landscaping excluding Temecula Community Services District (TCSD)
maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not
be Iirniled to private slopes and common areas.
3. Shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public
right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger.
j. Hardscaping for the following:
1. Pedestrian trails within private common areas
2. Equestrian trails
35. Wall and Fence Plans consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height,
location and materials for all walls and fences.
36. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all
structural setback measurements.
37. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however
solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Director of
Planning approval.
38. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen.
Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like
an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on
plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
39. Revise landscape plans to including the following:
a. Plan notes shall be revised to indicate planting pf slopes ''five feet or greater". The
planting shall include slopes of five feet.
b. The park design shall be modified as approved by the Director of Planning to meet
requirements of Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code. Water use shall not
exceed that allowed by Code.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Aev\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
10
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY
THIS PERMIT
G:\Planning\200S\PAOS.0378 Harveston III Barrington - Home Product Rev\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
11
Planning Department
40. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
41. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection.
42. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of building permits for
those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area.
43. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one
year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the
bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
44. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
G:\Planning\2005\PA05~0378 Harveston III Barrington. Home Product Rev\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
12
ITEM #8
DATE OF MEETING:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
CEQA:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Mav 17, 2006
Christine Damko
TITLE:
Associate Planner
Planning Application No. PA06-0037, a Conditional Use Permit and
a Development Plan application for a 22,522 square foot, three-
story mixed use commerciallresidential building (Dalton III),
consisting of approximately 4,669 square feet of retail space and 22
affordable apartment units located on the north side of Fifth Street,
approximately 200 feet east of Front Street
[8] Approve with Conditions
o Deny
o Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
[8] Categorically Exempt
(Section) 15332 (In-Fill)
(Class)
o Notice of Determination
(Section)
o Negative Declaration
o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
OEIR
G:IPlanning12006IPA06.0037 Dalton III . CUPIPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
1
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: David Kniff representinQ KEA Architecture
Date of Completion: February 6. 2006
Mandatory Action Deadline Date: May 17,2006
General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC)
Zoning Designation: Tourist Retail Core (TRC)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
SinQle-family home with accessory structure
North:
South:
East:
West:
Retail
RetailNacant
Retail/Office
Residential
Lot Area:
.38 acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio:
.54 proposed/1.0 tarQet ratio
Landscape Area/Coverage:
1,951 square feeV14 percent
Parking Required/Provided:
13 providedlO required
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the
applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
On February 6, 2006, Mr. David Kniff. representing KEA Architecture Development, submitted
Planning Application No. PA06-0037 for a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to
construct a 22,522 square foot mixed use retail and residential building.
The project includes both commercial and residential uses on a single lot and is therefore
considered a "Mixed Use Project" by the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. Per Section
IILF.3.b of the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan, a mixed use project may only be established
after first obtaining a Conditional Use Permit.
On April 10, 2006, the Old Town Local Review Board reviewed the proposed project.
Concerns regarding articulation on the side elevations were raised but then resolved once staff
and the applicant explained that the Dalton II Building and the future hotel expansion will block
the majority of the side elevations. The Old Town Local Review Board also questioned the
number of stories on the Spanish Colonial building, stating that the Specific Plan recommends
one or two stories on Spanish Colonial architecture. Staff explained the project meets the
current height regulations and that the Specific Plan gave suggestions on the number of
G:\Planning\2006IPA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPIPlanninglPClPC STAFF REPORTdoc
2
stories, but not requirement. Staff stated that the proposed building meets the intent of Spanish
Colonial architecture that is described in the Specific Plan. The Board agreed and therefore
recommended approval of the project.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project conforms to the development regulations of the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) zoning
district in the Old Town Specific Plan. Spanish Colonial architecture was very common in the
late 1800's and early 1900's and is therefore important to include as a prominent building style
in Old Town. The building setbacks meet the minimum requirements of the Specific Plan and
the 54 percent lot coverage is below the target ratio of 100 percent for this zoning district. The
proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles to utilize the site, as well as for
emergency vehicles.
The proposed three-story building will be located on the north side of Fifth Street,
approximately 200 feet east of Front Street, adjacent to the Dalton II Building (currently under
construction), and behind the Historic Palomar Hotel within the Tourist Retail Core (TRC)
district of the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. The building will consist of approximately
4,669 square feet of retail space on the first floor and 22 apartment units consisting of 17 total
bedrooms on the second and third floors that will be designated as affordable units.
The project will consist of 12 one-bedroom units ranging in size from 507 to 668 square feet
and 10 two-bedroom units ranging in size from 757 to 832 square feet.
The project fronts onto Fifth Street with an existing alley located to the north and an existing 20
foot wide access and utility easement located to the east of the project. The project provides
thirteen parking spaces dedicated for future residential tenants located on the first floor of the
building. This Specific Plan has no current parking requirement in Old Town, but the applicant
wanted to provide some parking for the future residential tenants. There is an additional area
dedicated as "Loading" for delivery and utility vehicles. Parking can be accessed from the
access easement and the alley.
The Specific Plan requires a minimum of 150 square feet of private open space dedicated to
each residential unit. The project proposes an average of 109 square feet of private open
space for the 22 residential units. In addition to the private open space, the project also
provides a second floor common open space totaling 1,033 square feet, which would give
each unit an average of 46.95 square feet of additional open space. Staff believes that the
combined private and common open space area fulfills the intent of the open space
requirement of the Specific Plan.
Architecture
Staff believes that the project meets the intent of the Development Code and the Old Town
Specific Plan. The proposed elevations achieve a historic look and overarching design to
create a prominent building in Old Town with strong character as well as function.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPIPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
3
The project proposes a Spanish Colonial architectural style that is consistent with Section IV-9
of the Old Town Specific Plan. The proposed buildings will be constructed of various materials
including a smooth stucco finish painted in Dunn Edwards Phoenix Vanilla, an approved color
in the Specific Plan and clay barrel roof tiles. The three-story building provides acceptable
articulation in roof forms and offsets to reduce massing and the sides and rear are visually
broken up with balconies, changes in materials, and architectural detailing. The tower element
is further enhanced by wrought iron detailing (on all sides) and a rounded window on the front
elevation. Rafter tails are provided on all sides of the tower and on the front elevation of the
building. Decorative wood beams with corbels and wood railings are provided along the
balconies of the front and side elevations while decorative wood doors are located on all
entries. Arcades are provided along the front elevation of the building and the rounded design
is continued throughout all sides of the building. Rounded wrought iron screens (used to vent
the parking area) are enhanced with rounded pop-out stucco trim and decorative tile accents
located on the side elevations. Additional tile accents are located along the side elevations
and along the permanent stucco and brick benched seating located along the front and side
elevations. Areas for vines are provided on the rear and side elevations by providing steel
lattice work painted black to match the wrought iron details on the building. Decorative
lighting, round clay pipe designs, and a forest green awning located on the front elevation
provide additional architectural details to complete the Spanish Colonial style of the building.
Landscaoino
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Old Town Temecula
Specific Plan. Plant materials include Purple Leaf Plum, Western Sycamores, Blue Lily of the
Nile, Japanese Boxwood, and Indian Hawthorne, these species are all consistent with the
Specific Plan. Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen soften building
elevations. The project proposes 1,951 square feet/14 percent of the site, which exceeds the
minimum requirement of zero percent in the Specific Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been
deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Class 15332, In-Fill
Development Project).
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Old Town Temecula Specific Plan, Development Code, and all applicable
ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the
Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving the Development Plan with the attached
Conditions of Approval.
G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0037 Dailon iii - CUPIPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
4
FINDINGS
Conditional Use Permit (17.04.010E)
1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town
Temecula Specific Plan.
The proposal for a mixed use complex, with retail on the first floor and residential uses
on the second and third floors. The project is consistent with the land use designation
and policies reflected for the Community Commercial (CC) land use designation within
the City of Temecula's General Plan, and the development standards of the Tourist
Retail Core (TRC) designation in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. The site is
therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type
and density of the proposed mixed use.
2. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town
Temecula Specific Plan.
The proposal for a mixed use complex, with retail on the first floor and residential uses
on the second and third floors. The project is consistent with the land use designation
and policies reflected for fhe Community Commercial (CC) land use designation within
the City of Temecula's General Plan, and the development standards of the Tourist
Retail Core (TRC) designation in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. The site is
therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type
and density of the proposed mixed use.
3. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development
of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures.
The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the
General Plan. Staff has reviewed the proposed mixed use project against the adjacent
land uses and has determined that the proposed uses will be a complimentary addition
to the area. The Dalton /I Building to the east of the proposed use is a retail/office
building and the proposed use will be a complimentary addition.
4. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and
other development features prescribed in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and
required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other
uses in the neighborhood.
Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan
requirements for a mixed use project and has found that the project meets all of the
requirements. On site parking for the project is not required per the Specific Plan,
however, 13 parking spaces will be provided.
5. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community.
G:lPlannlng\2006IPA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPIPlanninglPClPC STAFF REPORT.doc
5
Staff has reviewed the proposed mixed use, and found that it will not be detrimental to
the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Fire Prevention has reviewed
circulation and drive aisle widths and has determined that the site will able to be
adequately served by the Fire Department in an emergency situation.
6. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a
conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a
whole before the Director of Planning.
This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing
where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before
the Planning Commission renders their decision.
Development Plan (17.05.010.F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for the
Community Commercial (CC) land use designation within the City of Temecula's
General Plan, and the development standards of the Tourist Retail Core (TRC)
designation in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. The site is therefore properly
planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of the
proposed 22,522 square foot four-story retail/residential building.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The proposed architecture is consistent with the Architectural requirements as stated in
the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. The proposed architecture is consistent with the
architectural styles found in California between 1890 and 1920. The architect has
created a building that employs many of the key elements found on buildings of the
required time period. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been
found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and
regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in
a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 7
2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 8
3. PC Resolution 06-_ - Blue Page 9
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPIPlanninglPClPC STAFF REPORT.doc
6
ATTACHMENT NO.1
VICINITY MAP
G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPlPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
7
"
"
" "-
\
I!?
g
w
'"
o
:>
I
~~
~
~
"'J/
I
/
./ /
/ ;
tI Ii
",j
"
~
~
"-
'"
"
7,s '",-
"
"
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PLAN REDUCTIONS
G:IPlanning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPIPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
8
__n<l.fll....
~
-.' t. -"""'--1
~\-~t--: ~
'::]R"I-
; ";- ;'.tn
-~
KCll"'C
'~L
---:-5:1
I!:C,V,,'" ~
.... -.
-
--..--
----
~..':'Im':.-'"
=~-
---
---.
m_
_M_
-~-
--
,
I
,
,
LOT ~ ~ LOT 26 LOT 2~ LOT 24 LOT 23 I LOT 22 -"'""..-.:::-~--
~ g I :--=.-=.::,
I I I I I I I I
, I , I . I I
I I , , I I I , I I ...........-... ,,_.,.
____t____t____t____~_;---t ~~-~~--~-t--. 0 J~.----t-__-t-.--=:;~;-=
_J--- '-~- ~~'. --"'''''''-1-- -L----- --
_ __. I _ JI\ I _ ~ __
___. ,_u.
.. - -...... ~ .--. - .~. ......_ ,_u,
, 1-0.;' II I -- ..........
----1---.-1-----1--~1 I ~.. . J '.'.......F, -~--- ==~.:l:~
(;>-" '=l; i!f!'> ' ,. . ., ---
I I I...... I I ~ =- -== -~ I ~ ,f" =::.--.:rt...w.'""-~=:i
, I I @-J --Iff """ --~. -'"
! +- ,{';;~ -, I r-'~%: i-~'-;;
I l!:~~T~ \ ~ ~~:,. L , :{:. -.t:1 -- .t 'f:;:-' / ~~.:s--:!~...-
11'# ~ ..~';"".-~~.;..~~~......:.:""
-, '. v-- ~...::;j....... I :-:. """""
"II L: _. ~." ~ ~:r,-,,:,~.-
I I I ""''';'1'1l5:-,L I, 11 .4.. "'l:'."L"':~=_.
: j i 0--: - ~f i" -.-----n-~~ = ~ -:
-:~'~j-~~-~!~I-='-o~-=--jl- i-c+~IE1' ~ _'"- I.. '" 1j .~/ ~~~'._'
: : @- n +- -i.f e::>..?~I/ ~. .
I I 11 '1 --
I I'" -....J /f ............--
I I~.:=--l I -...- I .. ,/1 ~:::"':..__...
I I ~ -----~
0---- --- i1effioi /1 =,~o:...~_.'-'IO-
~ : =;. -~.-ILi;1 ~i~.:.-"-
I ~ - -- --- ! r..rq m'l".' :~.] ]
:::': .I :t:-:::jj
'; .1- '"'l~#Y;~ t' ~ 17-.
.;:, .., .~, .---'.- -'r----{...,.-' --r-- .---- !,!!.!'""'!!!!. !,!!.!"'"'!!!!!...
t~~~l'-'~Il~ --
OT 32
,
,
I
,
EXISTLN<:;. I
eU"~D~1
.-...,....._...._,....,""--....
,..._..._.T_........_.._..
"__"""._CCU<l'T,__
--
LOT 30
llT29
lOT 28
LOT 31
-.--.
-,........._-
.......__ w_u
~
_1-=__
..
==--:;. ~
~-,
---
...-.............
In'l'_CI_
l
~-
- i
- -
_~_~- N<!=
,
,
;'
,
~--~~-----------~------
,
&1lE 1Dl,AN AND GfIIICILNO ,l.00flt A.AN "~
..,-.
~
"'-...."
.-....","
".",..-
...."....."..
.---....
........-
~
~:!:
=.-~==..
~'l'&.'fZ"
i/.1Oli...
j
g
^
~i
.,~
~a'"
~t;;'~.~
ffi ~~~i
~ o;:':ij;:
~~~~e
'"
:z
0
~
5
"'
w
'"
=>
0
w
"
:; ~
.., <
" :z g
u 0
, >-
~
0 i3 !
"
"
DATE
~:i1-oe
:5F:-:::.
p.1M...~
--- --
~;;. ~
REVISIONS
'IT' .",
,1\.1" _"',
'" ,
~l .
I'":'," I
e<,
"~0$-D037
.
i .
,
",I
-.
-""""-,
M-~i
-. I
~~~!~ MAP
, N<}o
-,.;;-.~.... .m'" ---
'.-.... ---
~
JI~
. ~----'
:~ /
~ ------!...-........
~-------
~
.
<
"
,
-1L~rc--~
~ " "
.
.
.
~~
p
[7---' i'::'~m_]
l
=,::0 ~ T\JU
--~ i /' :J:::::tI
=-
~__ -J =-.'"";;..
CONCI!P"'NAL. 1..ANO
_.._ ecA~ ~
--
--
II
--
___ -;-.1;
-- ," II ... [1
__ II .
~~ ~-
r"'I'ui:::::::-. 1=-
~_.__=-:::<':;"':::" I:-::'j
~.. ~-i-.~~:-I~~
I;:: _~.:.-..,~ .-
. ..,"-=--...1--
I:=~I'_ _ =:: i:::--j
. .. ~:: ..~:0-.::E'-:..-:' 1:::---
~-- .~
.'''"'1.._='''_ J - .
~m_';:";' -1-"-
"""'~ -.-..-
~:~~':~~~~~~:~~
.
~
~
.-"......_b_
~If~~
~
~~
~~.
o
"
8
.
.~
~"~
,..
~ I~~~
~ 0-"'.
o ~~~ [
"
z
a
~
5
OJ
w
'"
::>
o
w
x
~ .~
z ~j
~ g ~~
O -' 0
Ir <~'i!
a. o;~
DAl~
F
t!;.l=
REVISIONS
~
SHEET NO
LI
'"
",.-au,
II
r _0_1
~Ir Ii I
_~lIiimm 133 m Iii !!
~..~I1:.~jti~~_
DAL TON 3
.t;( .' I'-H. ti~.. ... .. .....-.
- 1"\ _ -. -
; tlI _ ~ ~. !l1. I~ ~
m~ "ji 1:[ !i' mE! '1.1:[' 'ill 8 g. t t ~
, 1!. ...&-o:.m-rJ I,. 1.1 . . = m)[][ Dl
'] [Il" WlBJtmi~ 1
DAL TON 2
DAL TON
~.!~ ~_6. ~,.__,. ....__
LiJco..._'~''''''''oo;",,,,,,, ~
(lJ 5Z"~~':'~~""
[l] ..O....Q..........._
Ii) _.....0_'..
gb~~"
.......-_..
m ;.:";~..-.-=,: ~:z'O ..'"
.~. r
I .~--r------" ,
~~
~~
I '\,,~
~.
I I I
I~l .
l ~ ~
'JI-~
o
I
~~
1
I
ij] ~"=:..~o "'"'
B -_.",-_
Iil :,~~~~~"...o
Ii) ~:':,:::::::':"~";:".~":::'.""
i!I =-..::........::~~'~_
I1J :.:~..,,'_.""._.-..,"
@J~'~.~.;,~"""
. -.....
....=-
.~
..."."'....-
;:;1.-...
Ii) -<>~-"""''''''''''
!~,..
~~
~"1iif-
-- ts-
~~"i..
It~,,~
-..
18 ...-....-
m ...,.......-,..".....-
m ;:::::_....,...".......0.."
lID :='.~,~'--'
Iil ::""':::;;:""',00'.0_-'"
~...
.~...
.,-
-..
.;:,;;.....
.
GJ ~.:..':'-="....o""'"
Q "',"c,,,,,_,,-.
W --..--
lID ...'........--.'...-
ill _.._...._00__
i3 ,",,"-"'''''---''
i!I ::'=::~:~,;':.'~
.~.-
:!
~:
eO
cr: ~~
~ ~~
o t~
. ......""""'-..--.-
--
f!:?'1'FIOlIOR =l.t:lIIi I M.A""'~14U'l
G -- 1.=--=--__
~= J:__7_ :::
I--"-"~ 1-..------
~=::"::...,..-I=:=:=:== :
1--- ~~~~=_l
~ .:= ~~.~~~
~::= -r:=::.::::-..::::::::.-=-:
I=:=' ::::====::: 1
<?m~ cp If' <? C? <fl 0'jf
~~I II I I
~11 i -.. .- -;e .jl/m-"........ "\.,. II
ii=-A~ M-,_l ....~ - I I I I \ I
~.. .~ ~~ ~ _ JlJ1 II !i1Q_ _~1~ _~ ~~_ _ _ _;
;--;-P :'~.~.~tt~:
IM.... r YRIGJ.lT ELEVATIOf',I
ilJ =.=:.:;:..".....-
ill ___IT'__
6 ~..:,::'~~~""'" "'-
Ii .......__""'...,.~""'"
t!J
z
is
~
5
'"
w
Ul
"
Cl
W
X
:; ~
M <
Z ~
" 0 ~
u eo
~ ~
0 " 8
~ Cl
,_........ .----...
I"-......._.....,---~...
,-.-.-
<fl
qJ
<p
'16-1__
DATE
J-:l'I-D11
m'....'
.._<OJ
....---. ....-.. i
::.- ::::!
...._-g
ReVISIONS
ftj- ...J
. .......'"
~
I '"~'~~-
~:
LEFT ELEvATION
",
'AOIl-Co..37
T
~ ~ r ~ ~ cr,? r.
~- ~ I I II
ill>lL/J.tf'_~~.~- F ;!':
...:. = '...... 1..1 II
1,1 L. !~
--~~,~ - -J-i ~-
eeCTION NO!il2'Tl-l - ~
<p cp ._-- cp . .
J:r= }h;:
-- ; ~~...
.- .. I
R-- ~ , .mm.-
.- oo! I
, -;::;;:....
I
...... ""'" """" - - ,
~I I r::=-- I ,
I I
SECTION W~&"l' - 5A!L
-.......-
~.
..,.....s.,,"
.-.<.0....,
."',"~"..
"",..""..
.---..
..,=-
~
~::
"""""._"=-l"_
~.E~.!.tA
&1=<'.
--=-r
~..
o
,
,
~~
~~~
"0
U:.'"
~:OU
idii!'~
" !~"
'$. ~:;;~
o ..;~
\:>
Z
5
~
5
00
"'
</)
::J
C
w
x
" !
M ,
,
~
~
z
ti 2
~ ~
~ C5
D~U
g
..- --
-~~
m,
I'~~o
...
PAO&-C037
~
~
-
1 I.
~.(.~.~.!?~-.Jii.-l".
,,'_}~: .. J, ~,
Ii ~II ,
~.
. o.
<.: -
~
~
~
c:J ~ C;) 0
j - 1 :: . - r
0-,- -- - - - - -j~ - -- -.:: - - -- -, . -- - - --'::::-- --- -~---- - :.: - -- --:'---
1rm~~-~_m
(0/_ ______fn_.h_.~.~4-" h__
'I':J I > 19:E],
, . ,.,-........... I
:. ld~;..g j
I""""""~'...' I,
- - .-../
I .._~,.
--~-~ ~
_....,... _......... M'I""'-___
........ ........ '-.".
~~
."..-. "'".
.-.""....,
".,,,,..,,,
".."...,,"..
..."'....,.......
""'--
-~
t;-..;
.......!..
,,~
tUl
..,.
~
~.
.~~
.-
..
-.
"
!
~~,
..,
~~o>
h~~
ffi'. ",:r~,:.
0(.....,'"
~ ~~~~
o f;~!1'
@--'.
I
I
----+---
.
l
1
:1
'i~
.,
,
i~
~-
Ii
;1
>
i
,
,
,
~'
,
,
, I
-~
.-..- f ..' ~
'0 It
> -
I _ _ _ ~ I --
,
i
i
,
i
,
1
.
~-..:
.., '-.
. -
e--'-
@-.
~_.____i.____
~~ .-:;:;f;::::;
'-"
z
is
~
5
"
W
<f>
OJ
C
w
><
~ ~ ~
..
zoo
ti 0 t;,~
!!/ f- :!;:.."
o :;t ~~
[ c-.
@---
@-
0-_.1~_._._._.-
0--: -
0_.1_
0.-.
@-
0-
0--
0-
DATt
~~~-'"
,.....
~~.~
R~\lISIONS
T><llOD FL.OO'" Fl.A'"
,
i
._._._..-..J_._~..~._~_._.t._._._..-,_._~
&ECOND FL.~ l"L.A'"
~." ..-
. -......
r:l
........,..,.,-
.~
MOI-(l(I)1
~ ~
I 1
~~~I
I
~
'~sJ;::"
'-"'-'.
---
<p
I
C?
I
<P I
I
~.
. -~ ..ii.~
~r
EO""'-
---...
--~-C
I
;
I~,
.-i
~!: ~
!:~
" <
~~<)
Ii ~:=~
~ i~"
::<:.;(:;;::1.
o o.:O~
-i!..- I,;!-
C!)- - - - ~ :l....-
E jc- ~ _
I...
.b1',.I,)jll).;_
r~If"'(Q
I E1J;! I
I 1
.- - - ,,'- ~
I @@ 1 I I I @]@] '-
I I. .
~ ~~l I '""') ~~'.- ~~&.1
~._,=-,.--I"'lTiT"' T!iI ~ ., r..1I-'-"'__; =-
,., ._-J..-.~ .,:TI._ljJ . liT' /..,~ \
o T~}'!o . I .-. -"~,~ .. "" " ,
I I I
I I I I'<Oa' FL.AN , I
--..- I
eJf;!
&----
lID
!;I
0---
0--
eJEI
0- -
~ -
~
I
1 ~1al..1
~--, TT':ff~_
t~
I
I..,"
Iallal
~
~
,."...
-~:- --
I'
~
~
~
11ill!il
"'"
"
z
15
~
5
'"
'"
"
:>
c
'"
x
~ ~
. z "
t; 0 ~
'3 :J :i
[f ~ ~
O"lE
...~_t)I
a".~-
,.-
-'....~-
-.
--
REVISIOfjS
~
~
00
~
SHEETND
RP-I
'"
......08-0C\37
~ <il
@-Jrr. - .='--_:=.J-~!4----~------ . .
@r..: I" .-. - . .
"il --
! -.
'r
:): '1<:5 LQj--'-' ._- I, ,
,. tJ- '\- , Ij
'/( -. V8~ l-L1 '
",R---~~
, , . .
fiU~OR Jl""LAN ~IT P
',,:::;,:.:-:~.
~~ P'L..o4N. !.NIt J
("
@T"
':-i;:- "
-',..1 j--- -
i " ..-
: '_ 00_
I .--
@- ~-k?
,--
<:l
. "---ii
,
,
i
-,
--'
,
i
,
,
i
..tlIP.-
~~.fIlLOOR r-t.AN LNIT ~ ,
'f
,.
Ii I
~.i.~:~\U
,-p..~-~
, I ~__
@--~
'f
.
-
~LOOIIt ID\...A.N \.NIT G
o (jJ
r---- u:1
C \:- _-if _._._._-~-,_._._: i='-'-'-=-'-'-::;--'--~-ll-'- - -
@-, . I
,-'~I ,-- ,
" \~" -\
_" . .0_ ./'...._
~~rIIA '_ ! ;),
'\ J ' - 'J
~~.-LAN !..NIT l-I
"
~:~o_'tf
_~. 0 . \
I I Iii
.11"ij'11!l<::'ld~~, ~
" ,~~ II
I .
'11/"" I
: I 'I
I' I
::~ : ~~~ r~--~~~::~-_:~:~-~~?:; - * ~~
@.-.- - I , -. --~--- - _ +~-
0-
(>)
~
, I
: i
,
,
. ,
, i
I'__i
1
II
ee:CONO FL~ PLAN UNIT e
(>)
(,)
,
1.~ I' ..- 1'1' ,
I7;U~T.1 h:~~$
Ii -. m~ ;11""';1
: . ('o..,~~~~~'
-1J1!~ ~~_~%I~"'
@- ,-.~~ i i
0,_L~J~~_~-~:=~------b~~;1--' :
I \: ./ I '
e-' . i--I.--, -
,
THIRO FLOOfit F'LAN UNIT B
~
...",......"
""""'''''''
..........-..
~/lII:!/!Ia-
~- -'
. ~.-
=~:...-
.~
:'f;:!..;~t"
..
. .
~!
m.~
,"
~~
~8
H
"
z
is
~
5
"
w
'"
::>
Cl
w
x
;; ~
M
Z 0
t; 0 ;
~ t- !
~
0 '"
"
" Cl
-DATE
9>-:::
...
I:l_- __
--.
-,.:
~EV'SKlNS
~'
~i
r:~c I
PAl .
''''06-0037 J
o
&--rl
't
, -- f'--~
:-r: -
0----: --~~
0---L)
,--
-
(,)
.1,
~~'_._'
: ~
;
;
.'''"''---~ --
-.-.-.-. :::t
0---
Gl
1,,--r----------
-'----','--
,
;: --~~
'n-
J;~Q ~
- I,
..~"
i'---'-'---r'-=--'- ---1-- -'-:::!..___
dhGJ
,--
"'--,
~ '-..
0-'-'-'-~
--
0-----~
'-
I
0---
-"
(')
-~
,
,
------t---- in;
,
I
-. PLAN UNIT C
1141RO FLOOR
~,....,--
~
Gl
~
1:_
~....
,--
0-1
@-...I.
, - ~t' :
, , -~h___'__
I . __ ___;~
- ;--~JD~,,;~. .z; _
.....ca.rrr ~YJ _ -I
' - - .....AN UNI1 "
eECONP Fl.~
....-&>......... C{>
-- ""---l ___
-1+, ----t,-----,
' ,
" ,
II I
1 - ,__
h 'fTh'-i _,
l m ~~_
-'1'11~~ t. ~ - tA D8--L\
:_~, '--I
-c__ --~I ,---~;;~~-.1hJ..--~.::.~~-th-,~~
~ ----------t---- ~
: '- , I
I : II
i I
h__hh__,
-, PLAN IJN.\T C
~E~ PLOOR
............r-
Gl
1: ~1 '~I 0_1!?~11~-
0- l=1l: hh_____;' ____ '?~'~b ~
0-- 1 . ---- , h_ _ ,
' .
1 I __ _
.'1 : -- :_~ _ ,
Ii If
I-I ,-- '11"
I ,
,
,
o
: -~J~~<r!"
~----~Lll.,h-~::~]J~ _'
0-!--ff" ~_ _m..
' ,
' "<. Y I
\ ," """"'11-:
'-:g ,l-
It' '---~:I ,
,-- illP1 _~,o ~',~_
~"
c
0-
II'- .-
"'-
"LAN LNIT A
5ECON" F~OO!'!
_..-... 0
"LAN LNI1 A
Ti-lll'!!:> FLOOfIl2
.......,....,...-
~
,,'"'<<~~L
~?;~~
....==--
~'
C ., ...:~_
. .....
E!~-:T_
~~-=t4
~'3:i:!-..
g
,
~~,
0_'
<5",
eo,
~:;~g
ffi ~~g!
~ ~~2\~
o n........_
o
z
is
~
5
"
w
'"
'"
"
w
X
~ -~
Z ~j
. 0 ~ ~
'G I- ~ ~
~ ~ ~~
[ ""
o~n 3-21-01
~'_.-.
..!,-" ,
.!iiin-......._ ,
.' --
'--1-',
~-.i:._..
~
~I
;>~A~OO31
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PC RESOLUTION 06-_
G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPIPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
9
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA06-0037, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 22,522 SQUARE FOOT MIXED
USE COMMERCIAURESIDENTIAL BUILDING KNOWN AS
DALTON III
Section 1. David Kniff, representing KEA Architecture, filed Planning Application No.
PA06-0037, in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code.
Section 2. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application on May 17, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by Jaw, at which
time the City staff and interested persons has an opportunity to and did testify either in support
or in oppositions to this matter.
Section 4. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to and based upon the
findings set forth hereunder;
Section 5.
All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 6. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Sections 17.04.010E and 17.05.010.F of the
Temecula Municipal Code.
Conditional Use Permit (17.04.01 OE)
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Old
Town Temecula Specific Plan;
The proposal is for a mixed use complex, with retail on the first floor and residential
uses on the second and third floors. The project is consistent with the land use
designation and policies reflected for the Community Commercial (CC) land use
designation within the City of Temecula's General Plan, and the development
standards of the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) designation in the Old Town Temecula
Specific Plan. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be
physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed mixed use.
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and
development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will
not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures;
The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the
General Plan. Staff has reviewed the proposed mixed use project against the adjacent
land uses and has determined that the proposed uses will be a complimentary addition
to the area. The Dalton /I Building to the east of the proposed use is a retail/office
building and the proposed use will be a complimentary addition.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton 1II CUP\Planning\PC\Resolution with Sections.docl
C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas,
landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Old Town Temecula Specific
Plan and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with
other uses in the neighborhood;
Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan
requirements for a mixed use project and has found that the project meets all of the
requirements. On site parking for the project is not required per the Specific Plan,
however, 13 parking spaces will be provided.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health,
safety and general welfare of the community;
Staff has reviewed the proposed mixed use, and found that it will not be detrimental to
the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Fire Prevention has reviewed
circulation and drive aisle widths and has determined that the site will able to be
adequately served by the Fire Department in an emergency situation.
E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a
conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole
before the Director of Planning;
This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing
where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before
the Planning Commission renders their decision.
Development Plan (17.05.01O.F)
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City;
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for the
Community Commercial (CC) land use designation within the City of Temecula's
General Plan, and the development standards of the Tourist Retail Core (TRC)
designation in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. The site is therefore properly
planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of the
proposed 22,522 square foot four-story retail/residential building.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare;
The proposed architecture is consistent with the Architectural requirements as stated in
the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. The proposed architecture is consistent with the
architectural styles found in California between 1890 and 1920. The architect has
created a building that employs many of the key elements found on buildings of the
required time period. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been
found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and
regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in
a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06 0037 Dallon III - CUP\Planning\PC\Resolution with Sectlons.doc2
Section 7. Environmental Comoliance. In accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt
from further environmental review (Class 15332, In-Fill Development Project).
Section 8. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves
the Application PA06-0037, all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific
conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference
together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III - CUP\Planning\POResolution with Sections.doc3
Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 17th day of May 2006.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of May 2006, by the
following vole of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III - CUP\Planning\POResolution with Seclions.doc4
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\Planning\2006\PA06 0037 Dalton III - CUP\Planning\PC\Resolution with Sections.doc5
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECUlA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA06-0037
Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for a
proposed 22,522 square foot mixed use
commercial/residential building known as Dalton III,
located at 41955 Fifth Street, generally located on the
north side of Fifth Street, approximately 200 feet east of
Front Street
Assessor's Parcel No. 922-024-010 and 011
MSHCP Category: Residential/Commercial
DIF Category: Attached Residential/ Retail Commercial
TUMF Category: Multi-Family Residential! Retail Commercial
Approval Date: May 17, 2006
Expiration Date: May 17, 2008
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-four Dollars ($64.00)
for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as
provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations
Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to
the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted
shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
G:\Planning\2006\PAOS-0037 Dalton III - CUP\PJanning\PC\Orah COA's.doc
1
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-Q037 Dalton III ~ CUP\Planning\PC\Draft COA's.doc
2
Planning Department
2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
6. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
7. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and
elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
8. The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials,
equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied
by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or
technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the
condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the
real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision
to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Material Color
Stucco
Roof Tiles
Dunn Edwards SP2750 Phoenix Vanilla
Clay barrel tiles by MCA #B301, Old Mission
blend
Forest Green Fabric
Red fired brick (natural)
Wood Stained with Okon Weathered Brown
Awning
Brick wall
Wood details, beams, and posts
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III - CUP\Planning\PC\Oraft COA's.doc
3
9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
10. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
11. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These
shall be clearly labeled on site plan.
Public Works Department
12. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
13. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
14. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
15. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent
post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent
non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering any storm drain system or receiving
water.
16. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted to the City. The WQMP will
include site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment
mechanisms.
Building and Safety Department
17. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
18. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on
March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee
schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III . CUP\Planning\PC\Draft COA's.doc
4
19. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining properly or public rights-of-way.
20. A receipt or clearance letter from the T emecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
21. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
22. Show all building setbacks.
23. Developments with multi-tenant buildings or shell buildings shall provide a house electrical
meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire
alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with Single User Buildings shall
clearly show on the plans the location of a dedicated panel in place for the purpose of the
operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically
proposed.
24. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
25. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective Apri/1, 1998).
26. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
27. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
28. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
29. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94.21,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one.
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays
Fire Prevention
30. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06.0037 Dalton III . CUP\Planning\PC\Oraft COA's.doc
5
31. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1750 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2150 GPM with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A).
32. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x
4" x 2-21/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public
streets. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system.
The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix
III-B).
33. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required (CFC 903.2).
34. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet
(CFC sec 902).
Community Services Department
35. This development shall be able to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, a regular solid
waste container.
36. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction and
demolition debris.
37. The developer shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
38. All landscaping, fencing and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or
private maintenance association.
G;\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton [II - CUP\Planning\PC\Draft COA's.doc
6
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:IPlanning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPIPlanninglPClDraft COA's.doc
7
Planning Department
39. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project
site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the
Director of Planning.
40. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeologicaVcultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
Public Works Department
41. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
42. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
43. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
44. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
45. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-Q037 Dalton lH . CUP\Planning\PC\Oraft COA's,doc
8
46. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading,
Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's
standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
47. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number
(WOlD) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of
construction activities.
48. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Planning Department
c. Public Works Department
49. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
50. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
51. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
52. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
53. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPIPlanninglPClDraft COA's.doc
9
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:\Planning\2006IPA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPIPlanninglPClDraft CQA's.doc
10
Planning Department
54. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not
adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
55. The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Compliance to the Planning Department for review
and approval.
56. All downspouts shall be internalized.
57. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans.
c. One copy of the approved grading plan.
d. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
e. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
I. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed prograrn.
58. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire
check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group
utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-
thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and
insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
59. Building Construction Plans shall include details outdoor areas (including but not limited to
trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, and hardscape to match the style of the building
subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
60. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
61. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals
shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III . CUP\Planning\PC\Draft COA's.doc
11
over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as
closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
Public Works Department
62. Improvement plans andlor precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
T emecula Standards for Old Town subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P .C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard No. 400.
e. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries.
f. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
g. Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing
topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades.
63. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Fifth Street (Local Road Standards for Old Town - 60' RJW) to include
installation of half-width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, rolled curb and
gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer).
b. Improve 20' Alley (Local Road Standards - 20' RJW) to include dedication of full-
width street right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving,
drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
64. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections.
65. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal
systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate
b. Sewer and domestic water systems
c. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines
66. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-Q037 Dalton III - CUP\Planning\PC\Draft COA's.doc
12
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
67. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for Fifth Street.
68. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
69. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the T emecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
70. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Building and Safety Department
71. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
72. A sound transmission control study shall be prepared and submitted at time of plan review in
accordance with the provisions of Appendix Chapter 12, Section 1208A, of the 2001 edition
of the California Building Code.
73. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
74. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review.
75. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
76. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
77. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
78. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Fire Prevention
79. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
G:\Planning\2006\PA06.0037 Dalton III - CUP\Planning\PC\Draft COA's.doc
13
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1).
Community Services Department
80. The developer shall satisfy the City's park land dedication requirement (Quimby) through
payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to .27 acres of land. The amount of the in-lieu fee shall be
calculated by multiplying the required amount of parkland by the City's then current
appraised land valuation as established by the City Manager.
81. Prior to the issuance of the building permit or the installation of additional street lighting on
5'h Street, which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application
process, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan and pay the appropriate energy fees
related to the transfer of street lighting into the Old Town Streetlight maintenance program.
82. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-Q037 Dalton 11/ - CUP\Pfanning\PC\Draft COA's.doc
14
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY
THIS PERMIT
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III ~ CUP\Planning\PC\Draft COA's.doc
15
Planning Department
83. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant
shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from
view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is
determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet
walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the
developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof
element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning.
84. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
85. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one
year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the
bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
86. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed
prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
87. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
Public Works Department
88. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP
have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for
immediate implementation.
89. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
90. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
91. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III - CUP\Planning\PC\Draft COA's.doc
16
Fire Prevention
92. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3).
93. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC 901.4.4).
94. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9).
95. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation (CFC Article 10).
96. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door (CFC 902.4).
97. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
98. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable
National Fire Protection.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-Q037 Dalton III ~ CUP\Planning\PC\Draft COA's.doc
17
OTHER AGENCIES
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0037 Dalton III - CUP\Plannlng\PC\Draft CQA's.doc
18
99. Comply with the Temecula Police Department Conditions dated February 27,2006.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
G:\Planning\2006IPA06-0037 Dalton III - CUPIPlanninglPClDraft COA's.doc
19
TEMECULA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Crime Prevention & Plans Unit
28410 Old Town Front Street, Suite 105, Temecula, CA 92590
(951) 695-2773 Fax: (951) 506-5708
Date:
February 27,2006
Project Number:
PA06-0037
Project Type:
Conditional Use Permit - (151 Submittal)
Project Name:
Dalton III
Project
Description:
A proposed Conditional Use Permit with a Development Plan application
submitted on 2/6/06 for a 22.522 square foot mixed use building called
Dalton III located on Fifth Street within the Old Town Specific Plan
Applicant:
Bill Dalton
Case Planner:
Christine Damko
The following comments pertain to Officer Safety, Public Safety and Crime Prevention measures
regarding this planning project transmittal.
1. Landscaping: Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding the building are kept
at a height of no more than three feet (3') or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants,
hedges and shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from
breaking into the building utilizing lower level windows.
a. Applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding the building roof top be kept at a
distance so as to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Trees also act
as a natural ladder. Prune tree branches with at least a 6 feet clearance from the
building.
b. Any burms should not exceed 3' in height.
c. The placement of all landscaping should be in compliance with guidelines from
Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) (See conditions item
#9 below).
2. Lighting: All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex should be energy-saving and
minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting
Ordinance, California Government Code 8565. Furthermore, recommend all exterior
lighting be in compliance with Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance 665 requiring low-pressure
sodium lighting.
a. Recommend all exterior doors have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed
above each door. The doors should be illuminated with a minimum one (1) foot
candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed.
b. All exterior night lighting should be wall mount light fixtures to provide sufficient
lighting during hours of darkness and to prevent problems on the premises.
c. The Governors Order to address the power crisis became effective March 18,
2001. This bill calls for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage
during non-business hours. The order, in part, states: "All California retail
establishments, including but not limited to shopping centers, auto malls and
dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during
non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public,
employees or property."
d. "Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 in
accordance with section 8565 of the California Government Code."
3. Hardware: Recommend all doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other
miscellaneous hardware is commercial or institution grade.
4. Graffiti: Any graffiti painted or marked upon the building should be removed or painted
over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered.
5. Alarm System: Upon completion of construction, the building shall have a monitored
alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm
company, to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant
offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building should have their own alarm
system. This does not apply to apartment type buildings.
6. Roof Hatches: All roof hatches should be painted "International Orange."
7. Public Telephones: Any public telephones located on the exterior of the building should
be placed in a welHighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature
to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the
interior of the building.
8. Marked Parking for Disabled Vehicles: All disabled parking stalls on the premises
shall be marked in accordance with section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
9. Crime-Free Multi-Housing Program: Recommend project manager contact the
Temecula Police Department regarding pre-qualifying the units as a "Crime-free Multi-
housing unit. This program involves the Police and Fire Departments. All managers
must attend a mandatory training course; pass all lighting and Crime Prevention through
Environmental Design (CPTED) inspections dealing with landscaping. Upon completion,
the complex will be granted status as being a crime-free multi-housing complex with
proper signage posted at the entrance to the complex. Requalification is done on an
annual basis. Furthermore, the definition of Crime Prevention through Environmental
Design (CPTED) as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) at the
University of Louisville as '1he proper design and effective use of the built environment
can lead to reduction in the fear and incidence of crime, and an improvement in the
quality of life." The primary nine CPTED strategies are:
a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border
definition may include fences, shrubbery of signs in exterior areas. Within
a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as
means of identifying controlled space.
b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to
identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space.
c. Relocation of gathering areas. Gathering areas or congregating areas
need to be located or designated in locations where there is good
surveillance and access control.
d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal
users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to
abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention.
e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas
of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and
make the users of the areas feel safer.
f. Redesignate the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate
activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and
children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other
functions to avoid such conflict.
g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce
the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of
surveillance and intervention.
h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance.
Abnormal users need to be aware of the risk of detection and possible
intervention. Windows and clear Iines-of-sight serve to provide such a
perception of surveillance.
i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished
through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example)
and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public
building.
10. Crime Prevention:
a. All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their
booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association
1127-11'h Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal
Code 490.5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a
civil demand program.
b. Business desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the
Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department.
c. Employee training regarding retail theft, credit card prevention, citizen's arrest
procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related
crime prevention training procedures is also available through the crime
prevention unit.
d. Any business that serves or sell any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with
all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines
associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the
Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees
and owners. This includes special events held at business location where
alcohol will be serviced for a fee and the event is open to the general public.
e. The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to
participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less than $40.00 for
inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a
personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of
the business-advising customers of the "Inkless Ink program in use". If the
business becomes a victim of check fraud, the police department will be able to
track the suspect with the thumbprint.
Any questions regarding these comments shall be referred to the Temecula Police Department
Crime Prevention and Plans Officer at (951) 695-2773.
Lynn N. Fanene, Sr.
ITEM #9
DATE OF MEETING:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
CEQA:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 17, 2006
Stuart Fisk
Associate Planner
TITLE:
Planning Application No. PA06-0048 (Fast Track), a
Development Plan/Conditional Use Permit to construct and
operate an automobile dealership building with associated
service facilities totaling 32,560 square feet on 3.7 acres
generally located at the southwest corner of Ynez Road and
DLR Drive
l:8J Approve with Conditions
D Deny
D Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
D Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
l:8J Categorically Exempt
(Section)
(Class)
15332
32
D Notice of Determination
(Section)
D Negative Declaration
D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
G:IPlanning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP.DPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
1
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: Jim Cappadocia
Date of Completion: February 22, 2006
Mandatory Action Deadline Date: AUQust 21, 2006
General Plan Designation: Service Commercial (SCl
Zoning Designation: Service Commercial (SC)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Rancho Ford
Vacant
Retail
Vacant
Lot Area:
3.7 acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio:
0.20
Landscape Area/Coverage:
18,677 square feet/11.6%
Parking Required/Provided:
108 spaces required/108 spaces provided (excluding
inventory and display spaces)
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The proposed project is a request by John Hine Mazda to construct and operate a 32,560
square foot building to be used as a Mazda dealership. The dealership will be located at the
southwest corner of Ynez Road and DLR Drive on 3.7 acres in the Service Commercial (SCl
zone. The site will function as a sales and service center. Hours of operation for sales will be
from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday thru Friday, 8:30 a.m. thru 7:00 p.m. Saturday, and 10:00
a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sunday. Hours of operation for parts and service will be from 7:00 a.m. to
6:00 p.m. Monday thru Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. The parts and service
departments will be closed on Sundays. The Mazda dealership will employ approximately 35
people for sales, service, and parts.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the
applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0048 Hin. Mazda CUP-DPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
2
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designation of Service
Commercial (SC). The building meets the minimum setback requirements of the Development
Code and the proposed lot coverage of 19.1 percent is below the maximum allowed lot
coverage of 30 percent. The applicant's Statement of Operations states that 175 parking
spaces are required for new and used vehicle inventory and customer parking. Staff has
determined The proposed Mazda dealership requires 108 parking spaces (excluding inventory
spaces) and 108 spaces will be provided for customers and employees. The project has been
conditioned to clearly identify, with the use of paint, parking spaces designated for employees
and customers (see Condition of Approval No. 64).
Access to the site will be provided from Ynez Road and from DLR Drive. The building will be
set back approximately 196 feet from the Ynez Road, 115 feet from DLR Drive, 50 feet from
the south property line, and zero feet from the west property line. Within the building the sales
area and showroom facility will be oriented towards Ynez Road. The repair area will be
oriented towards the west side of the building, and a ramp to rooftop vehicle inventory parking
spaces will be integrated into the building along the western property line. The area of the site
oriented towards Ynez Road will be used for the display of new vehicles and customer parking.
Architecture
The proposed building design is consistent with the Development Code and Design
Guidelines, and is compatible with the automobile dealerships and retail buildings in the
surrounding area. The proposed building provides multiple building planes, varied parapet
heights, and significant window area at the showroom portions of the elevations facing Ynez
Road and DLR Drive. A canopy area at the east elevation of the building creates a focal point
and cover for the main entry. Roll up doors providing access to the service area of the building
will be located at the north and south sides of the building and will be adequately screened
from public view by building walls and landscaping.
As mentioned above, the building includes rooftop parking for vehicle inventory. The rooftop
parking area is surrounded by a solid four-foot high parapet on the south and west elevations,
and a combination of parapet sections with either a solid four-foot high parapet or two feet of
wrought iron guard railing on top of a solid two-foot high parapet at the east and west
elevations. The purpose of the wrought iron sections within the parapet wall is to allow for
some visibility to the inventory on the roof, thereby letting prospective buyers know that the
dealership has more inventory than what can seen in the surface parking lot. The project has
been conditioned, however, that the wrought iron guardrail portions of the parapet shall occur
only at street facing elevations and shall not comprise more than 40 percent of the parapet
along these elevations (see Condition of Approval No. 10).
The main body of the stucco walls will be painted ICI Dulux ''white'' with a painted 2.5 foot high
band located 12 feet above ground level in ICI Dulux "Veil" at the north, east, and south
elevations. Vertical stucco columns on the west elevation will also be painted ICI Dulux "Veil"
with clear anodized aluminum accents and a four-inch horizontal screen line in clear anodized
aluminum is proposed approximately 24 feet above ground level on the west elevation.
Service and showroom area canopies are comprised of aluminum composite panels in "Silver
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-OPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
3
Metallic", and wrought guardrails at the north and east elevations for the rooftop parking area
will be painted in Sherwin Williams "Online".
Landscaping
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and
Design Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement will effectively soften building elevations and
will provide accenting and screening appropriate to an automobile dealership. The project
proposes to landscape 18,677 square feet, or approximately 11.6 percent of the site, which is
consistent with the Supplemental Development Standards of the Development Code for
automobile dealerships.
The applicant is providing a 16-foot landscape buffer along Ynez Road and DLR Drive that will
be planted with Queen Palm, Liquid Amber, African Sumac, and Bottle trees and Fortnight Lily,
Variegated Tobira, Indian Hawthorn, Lily-of-the-Nile, Star Jasmine, Abelia, Daylily, and Tobira
shrubs. A five foot landscaped area is provided along the south property line and the building
is located against the western property line. Future development of the adjacent site to the
west will provide for an approximately 45 focit wide by 20 foot high landscaped down slope
adjacent to the west side of the proposed Mazda building. All parking rows will have a
minimum of a five-foot wide landscape planter at the end of each parking row.
Conditional Use Permit
The Mazda dealership will utilize lifts and related automotive diagnostic and repair tools. The
repair of automobiles includes the exchanging of parts, adjustments to automobile systems,
fluid changes and additions, and in some cases the rebuilding of specific automotive parts.
Hazardous materials will be used or stored on site in amounts less than the limits established
by the Uniform Building Code and Fire Codes. The applicant has made this request in
compliance with the City's Development Code, which requires a Conditional Use Permit for the
sale and service of vehicles.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been
deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Class 32, Section
15332, In-Fill Development Project).
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution
approving the Development Plan with the attached Conditions of Approval.
G:IPlanning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
4
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.01O.F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City.
As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for
Service Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The
General Plan has listed the proposed use as a typical use in the Service Commercial
designation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations outlined in the
Development Code for the Service Commercial zoning district. The Land Use Element
of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with existing
buildings. The proposed automobile dealership is compatible with the surrounding
automobile dealerships and retail buildings located in the vicinity of the project site.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure
that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with
public health, safety, and welfare.
Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.04.010.E)
1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development
Code.
The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan. The project has
been reviewed for consistency with the General Plan and the project, as conditioned, is
consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan.
2. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures, and the proposed conditional
use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures.
The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses in the vicinity of the project site, and the proposed use,
as conditioned, will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The
conditional use is consistent with the City's Development Code and is compatible with
other activities approved in the vicinity of the project site.
3. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the yards, walls, fences, parking, and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and
other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the
Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood.
G:\Planning\2006IPAOB.0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT-doc
5
The proposed automobile dealership will adequately provide a/1 improvements including
yards, wa/1s, fences, perking, and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and a/1
other features as required in the Development Code and by the Planning Commission
in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and
general welfare of the community.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and
general welfare of the community. The project is consistent with the goals and policies
contained within the General Plan and Development Code. These documents were
adopted by the City Council to assure that projects are not detrimental to the health,
safety, and general welfare of the community and compliance with them assures that
this is achieved.
5. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a
conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a
whole before the Planning Commission.
The project has been reviewed, as a whole, in reference to a/1 applicable codes and
ordinances before the Planning Commission.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 7
2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 8
3. PC Resolution 06-_ - Blue Page 9
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
4. Statement of Operations - Blue Page 10
5. Fast Track Schedule - Blue Page 11
G:\Planning\2006IPA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-OPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
6
ATTACHMENT NO.1
VICINITY MAP
G:lPlanning\2006IPA06-0048 Hin. Mazda CUP-DPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
7
\
. .. \
~
/
/
/
.\~.
$\
" .. \
\,~
A)..
VICINITY MAP
P A06-0048
John Hine Mazda
\
\ ,
\
"
'$;'7 --------
'/7
IF
~
~~
//~
/~
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PLAN REDUCTIONS
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
8
s"tu3.DjQ.c'JIO!
stu301 f'l .
~.L;U!,J
"':;: ".q.p:;;:-.;
.~
.y
.., .""j, r\']'!::J CUJ1l
S.~W:.U!l;J!i; "
_____________pLR DAlY!
-----
-----------
,,-
~,~
I
I}
6)@
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
i
;:= I
-" I
''-
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
i
I
I
~
--
=.s.~..::-
---
===:...-s.==-'-
-~-
-~-
:::::-...-.- ..--
---
~
--
=.5.:"::-
..-.....-....
-....--.......-
.I,~~:_~
=::::"'....~..=,....-
=:..~.=....=F".L.-::~..._
6,;.:-....:.:;,;;--'..-
&al.IA:l..
--.
---
:::::=---
""...--
---
,... ---
--
--
--
=-
--,-_._-
-.-
-.-
-...-"'"
-.-
-......-
=-
----..-....-
_.___ ..~.~_T'~..
--
--
--
--
--
-::--
=-
~; .........',......T1......
.-.-......---......"""
::::::~~"'::.."='
:.--.................
':.:::"==
~ ~....
-.-
--,,-
-.........-
-;:
-.---
-~-
..."'-...
,..'.....""'1""-
.-
.-
--
.-
.-
-~,
.-
.-
--
--
.-
.-
.-
'-
~
~
I ~II
! Ii
..
il
II
II;!
.
II
~ I
:cl
(F)l
r=-
:1
S j
11."
,-t..
'" - --
!;;; ~ .---
" --
~
SP-1
. .-
,
PLANT IJ!OHND
....
---
..." ----
....._on-.....
._~
~;; ==-==-.-
&~,;;;;:..~...-
....
--
=--
~-
-.-
--
--.
__A
_T~
"
NORTI-l f'l-AZA OIltIVE
z
c
~
co
z
;:
z
c
..
..
\ ....""-.-
\'Z-~
',\ \ II~~~..
..~---._..,..
J.d '~_COl'1'_
__A
r:~e~'tI; l-Il".10","l
-
-
..-
...--
...--
...-....
...-.."
...-....
...-....
<I ~i
~ g Ii
~~ iil
~!
._~
,,-- -
..---....
..---..."""-
.t.: =:::- -=:.:......"...
.,.....-......~..
---
..-............ .-..-
...-.....--
..------
..__00"""......-'
~--
~--
-
.--
_I.L'r
.~-
---
~--
~....--
-
~~.
-
-
::""-
-.-
.-
.-
.-
'-
,-
'-
'-
.-
.-
,-
.-
'-
.-
'-
r--
~
-
0:- ,..='
"
~
Ilh! !
II Ilil! i
r:aJ'1 I
~Ill!
-I
.I!
"
~ !
-
'.!':.....-=.::t.=-~:r.--'"
---. ---..--
-.....,---.-
II
':
-
~~==--='~'.~"-.-...-
== _<i -'~~=i-:=';~,
~...r;--~~-~ ~~
:;:=IJF:""l..=-e:=c:::--~'."
1~~""~-~';~':"="'~
~_____""'-"'__1lT
_ _ ."'-M<I'M""__
""~~:.::.....:.e:,,,=,.:'~.....
~~,,==--:7~
............, ____..n_.._....
""I~ ~'j) ~ ~ ~
I '-
; I ---I I ,-
I- l
I '
cc +--j-+-- --1-- ::;)
8
-'-'
i
I t..-.-..
U
J:.-
I-[}-"'"
L_:~,
00 :~ T.Y ~
H..cl ~"'_
. - , ...:..-.;;Jj
I -I' ~'~
1 1'01 j-----I'T..I':l::..,~..,-:;,.::
, , l ~ "~I
:'1 i'=D' . "-J ..,,:t iif-~-
I 'I I ~ rL:'~~. III
, ! U,~'~~'.l
0-,L~t:-~~- -1jB't--- ~.I - ,__u ~
1 i ""~ 'I
~ ~i~d'J i--
8.
,
(,)
~1N(l, ~IXTlJIII!E& IltEQUIIII!P,
I UK.OI'l'I<:,Ie I 'orOG<. ~~F.~:I~oml
115U><lo.-.... ".>>1", D,MIe'.Kf_'. ;::'. :-iio .,...,- - '':::-I~ I
"'!I.'e!!ot. ......1"".1""1".."""
lIW..L~,
..
IE!
"
_ JB"""" --
............-.........."'"
-.--..--....
- ---..--...
* ---,-
=0
'""
...
-,-
---
----
I ~,'*'"VI'" I 'or~ ~:~I~~
IDLCIG.-..... ,.,~'v. .._,um_,. UJ-~I~la.'!J.:__
&4)23& -'" '''''I'''~'''I"''''
~o
.....--1____-
TOT.... c::oc:ap.aHl::Y........:>. _II
-0
"""""","",
00-
..--
l!!l-"".......
..-
..-
""-
..-
""--
""--
i:!iJ-_....
[!!!]---
""-
~--
[!i!J--
""-
00_...
CiJ-...
m--
rn--..
00---
rn--
rn,.,...-
m -,-...
m--
m--
00-..-
m--
00 ---
I:EI__
""-
~........_-
(!!J......---
[E).....--
00......-,--
[!iJ--
(!!J.....--
CEI-,-
~ ----
[EJ--
""--
""--
[EJ--
[!]]--
[EI---
""-
""--
""-
1liJ...._
I:E!J"'-
(ii!]"'-
00-
00-
[i!j]..-
[!!)......-
....:1_-.....
-
---
-- ....
-- ....
-- .....
-- ...
-- ...
...- -..
- --
.--- ....
___ M"
-~ ....
--
--
--
-.... ""'""'....
-~
Q
~
ml
Ii
..
,I
a
.1
III!
.
Ii I
. !
.
.
III I
.5
:z: I
~l
~
~l 1
~'
Q 'J
l;:"
o :~
In
" ,.
I]
;;;; .~.I
~ ~C-A-1 j
- -
.......
~
8
'f'Tf'I!1<::<::NlTlOlJC'T......._"""l-POII=>
8
_ _ _~....I ~ _: \V L!I!llII . ~ <:
1l5'I1' '- I - '. ~: '" ~
'1i.T ~ I 'm' ! I I"" U
II' ~ ' - I
''''''~dl}xjfrl'l: :!'.'~f~----I~" -.8
t- " - ~"~-~::~'-;~~f~"~:-~ :"2~;1 +r!.1~4
o -"i.:' -@ L~mmm____m_~______m__~m__J I ~ ~~) & @
" " 'I
II ~---------------=-~----------------i-t ~
.J.1-~L~ I = II i =-~~,.~. ._~
, ~~;;;;;.iV~'1P?7..w~~ljfj?~~~------------G
. . . --I' :;.- -- '-1-' "-,' '-1-'-
.~':.:'.:: ',~ j . -- ~I ._~=:':"~,-.
::1l:~.~ I ~ ~----.I'"::: '--~;;l
-~'~I~ -~._~=~--'-'~.' - '" -.'"
u , ~ ~~___ ~
I: -I: ~:=~- -r;-;_
ij ~II
~r4'~;,"
~:
,
I._____~-""~----
r:
c.
~
~
!
8ecT1ON ~ Q
+..::
I'
~
,
~4
---<<
'II " --~.,-,..
,..., -
:,-f,.,;'
..1'" ,.'
. .' -.,
..... ;,.,
_I
_.~.::...::...0
... :::
1 ..... ~
-%: -/'///~;;/~///;/;)-;j~/1W///#/f'#/&//J_..:__'.., ;//,77
NORTH KLEVATION
I!AIlT ELeVATION
idW-- ~",'1~,':"",".
,-".\__,0, ';,
I -,'
I __
80tIIH BL2VATION
~LECiIEND,
[Ol-
!i!!J........-
I!!!!l --,..-..,
..-
""-
IE-
...-
tE--
l!!!J--
00_.........
11i!J---
...-
llOJ__
[j!!J---
..-
[!!]-...
0-'"
m--
m---
CEl-'-
00---.
CEJ-.........
m -,-..
CiJ........-
0--...
[!!]--
CEl-........
00 ___
[!!]--
[EJ_.
[!!J..........--
U!J-..___
(!!]-.._-
[!!] ----,--
[!!.J--
(!!]---
(iJ-,-
O!!J----
[![]--
CEl__
O!!J....-
[!!]--
[!iJ--
(!!J--
..-
0iiJ---
[<J--
1:BiJ..,--
[5!)"'-
OiiJ"'-
CEl_
[5!).._
[BD.._
t:iiEI-__
"I.PNO_
-
-- ...
-- -- ;;:;;0
-- --
-- -- -.
_........,.,.,.,
--
-- --
~
~
I !I
! ~I
II
0-
Il
II!!
i
8 .
g
~
z
8
--
~ I
; !
0:
~ CI I
b .5
3 :z: I
~ (f) I
!i
~ '..
0:"
Q.-
r
a: ~:
8 ;
[ i,
~ L........
8=-.;:~_1
w __
",-
A-U
.--
f f f f
, 1, , t .
0-h--+----Lt--------j--.-- .
I I ! Ii!
0-..--,~ T ~
ii
, ,
I I
&---- --.Ml-- .-----...----.
1 I am.
w- -10 Ii ..,',
0- ---- ->'l---- --,;.-r:- -----
--" ,
""'"
, "
"I II H
0----- ~---l--f--
""'" II ~
0----- r-u __I jnU'k~J
i 11
if!
i ii
tl
4'
~
I
~
am.
1"1"1
am.
....,
am.
11II1'1
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
,
~
1 f ~
'...- I __j.____!. ---+-------__0
I'] ~.-
,--.-.~ --;----+-~--~--0
[~c ~I i I i \
~~. 1-
'-'..l' : rl __ I~- _---rL-_-=.__L .J -----__0
.~:j_" - cr- - IT"" .t=mC"---T--~
.-,-:; ::'_f I /..-
[~i~J r-r-1 t1'[: / r
. i..r":":_
...t-; ,-+-, I L
c:: 1st'. r:::~
~-~tikLf-1: ;:--=-
"""'.m. ,___.
___, ~-t-i I
L "J ~----
___< ,,,
I :::
f-t-; I
'" i----
___~ : i i "n __ I _
___J '-+-1 I I
'_.1._' --r4~-
.;-_,-----;-_.,.~~~ -----;~.l
':::1 I I i '-iTj I
I f-t-, ~-.,...... ,
:===i : i: t=~t I
;~~:J ']?'-~~ __ L
I : I '"lME
J ,
r 4uT I
i i i
i i
, -i~
~ ~
f
,4P . _.
I =
,
I~
;~~ ----
I
1
-=-=----=- -=---=- -= ~
8
I
I ,-
I ".. I I
L-t ~.c.._.J-------__0
'I I I I
I Iii I
Iii I
I I I I I I
i-t-t--~~_t-~-------~
~ ~ ~ ~
----__0
..............,.
;=r.=:,'l""""-......
::::.::.,..---
- .....-....-...-........
-,--_-..
- -----...
..:::.. ---,.....
=
. - - ~I '-::-:~-.'-1
1--- -... -...."':'. ~=~=
, -- I .-- .-.\ "j
1--- --.. ~:::-.~fi';i#~.;;-..
..
'"
..
-~--
i)@
~,__ _. - _____e
?QT....... -~,.._...,
"'"
"'"
-.........
---
----
I'OOMLEMND.
COl-
~---...
{ft)-...-...
..-
..-
~-
...-
lE--
[EJ--
~_.....-
~---
"'-
[00--
~---
~-
~_..
m_..
m--
[!J--
0']-_
rn--
0!iJ......-
0-'-
rn--
[!J-"'-"
""--
m--
CEI---
[JIJ__
""-
(!!] -..--
(EJ-..---
00-"--
CEI--'-_
(EJ--
(!!J...........-
rn-,--
00---.....
[JIJ__
(EJ--
CEJ....-
[EJ--
C!'!J--
00.........-
""-
Gil---
COl-
[EJ...-
[]!J...-
C!El"'-
[;!]-
[!!!]...-
[BiJ..._
00 ---
"'~Nlo'-"'"
;:: g€'
[.-
~
---
--
--
-- -..
--- .....
--- .....
-- ~..
_....._U"'T.
- -.
-- ....
--- ....
-~ --
-.
~.
W
~I
Ii
"-
Ii!
II
II!!
.
!i!
o
~
i : I
~ ; I
~ ~ I
~ :z: I
~ (Dl
ii
~, 1
H .
:5\ I
...
a::~
8:1
~ ~:
0,1
z~
8= .~
w __ -..-
CD_
A-U
~q)(;) q:>
-"I)}:'ll r-' (' I.t'r-' ('
, )1':.' ".,"J!' '),...,' I"
.-' ,~'" =.- ..
,- . '-. ... . .-'
r '. . '.
",I
EAST ELEVATION
()
,\""\
"\ "\ .~'\'--,--
'. ,.:"2~,,,d;:;:: R~~ ~'~ ~,~ -~~ !.l
.ZA,'I' ~'."..' ....&!
~~~
:J
PAAT1AL EAST ELEVATION
'>l
I
"\ I ~I r--l___- ~I ~ I ~ Ii
= ," '" .I-~;X:...~),;J . '.' ~":l+~;J,;,JJb"?i. ~) ;,j... ~ ,~::"'_jJ~ :
" .\ .. "'--1. -: . 11....-. ..,.,.,'. . ,:1, t '
L . "1 . <I- '1<' I. il,l,
r:-_,' ,', r,.': i I I
. I :
. "......
'.."J I
NORTH E\.EVATION
EXTERIOR COLOR.. MATERIAL SCHEDULE
:I--=- I 11- - if
-,---~ '
~-
- ---
- --
-,--
"'-I---'-:--t=*' -.... I
- ---.- ..--
~,---,- ...-
1__-
1---
.~
~ D~~=~
"\ ~ ===--
,tJ,i.....__
lril__..._ I
'~!iii:iil';;'--"'" I
. ~...~ ....-~==-
l!l lIr.:.o:...~~==-..:::.--
"T...______
i~~
I L.EGIEND I
I.:.. --_.------- II
~ ---=-...;.:'""....:...,--...-
I CEJ --.--------1
-=
'--~-
L.......
,....-
~ _-:.. :
..1- _ 1___ 1.__1_
- 1=--
'_W'~~
I-.__-_-~
~. --~ . --- ,-_.~. ---- "-~------
,I
G)
. -
~
(I
0'
;
f
.1
~l
II
I,I!
.
II
~ I
if
fI)i
~----;;:-=--
".
ti
~ ~'
wI
0:.
21
~~:"?--
~
~ of A~2_J
f
SOI.lTll ELEVAnON
~
y
~I ~~, ~~I " ..1
~b ~ d ~ I.~ ~. jj
I I~ 1 i i i_\~
....
~N:iNO'T1!e
~--
ID'__.._
Am'_____
I!II-"''''--
1"......--
~I--..-
I; -~~=.:.::::- I
I [E] --.--------1
1-"---.-_1
1=
--,
~ e,.~.:;r:..:.::: ' I
"il =.~.._- I
lJJ ==':..."'l'.:t':=r~ I
1'''' ~_ I
B-E':;;'::-;~
^ ~ I;;;;~;,,:c -
1-
!=I_~~~= I
1::::'-1---
1~"="'1l._
~.
.
.'-
E
..
~Il
Ii
'.
j
a
.1
III!
.
II
~ I
z:l
(E)i
1-= I
CD:
~;:
~ ~
~j
w 1
0:,
g'
~~ -
~,.... -..-
..-
A~2.1
r r r r r
, , , ,
I I I I IW
- 1
,
, I'
-'-l~-- -- _,;",,0, I, "I
I ~
- ~ [:+:J '-\-. -'"'
- ,--,
8ECTION ~ A
== =
? ? \ 1 1 ~" ?
, ~I ,
II ~ IfPrll~~~!WtI~-r I
, II I I II
" l.,i.",~~~ J. ''il' j~.
, Ii C
~
I;
.-... I '1
1- ',. J, I"
I.',' '), '.'
W :,' ." JtILI}
8ECTlON . .
== ""'IF
<? ~ ? J
" I, r
LB1li-J?~.k{~:IJ ~:,
__ =1= =1= =1=
?
,
II
SECTION - C
==
?
I
~
r
J
r ?
L,"=~
I
,
I fil I-H 'II-H I-H d__
_I -JJ-'~: ii.J] [;~ I
'-'r'~"-"I ~
.j....<..j.j.,<':; : "D
,--,~',",:~",":'-'.,-~ .-..~
8ECTlON . D
~
~
?
I ~I
! Ii
.
~!
II
III!
.
II
~ I
zl
~l
Q
..
0,
aI:"
-<~
CD ::~
z'
r
w::
Q) ~
~::I
9':: _-::..
- :3 =:. ~-.,_.
1O-
A-3
r 9 r 9
, .- , ,
""",\ ,', ," \,' "" ,
I," \l
.senOH ~ E
19
, ,
~
9
T
9
?
1])
~i
G)~
. -
~
~I
Ii
..
II
III!
.
II
= I
zl
II) I
ILh-l
",'" ,
w:~ :
,,'1 I
~j
w '~ .
ij I
9;" -
5 -- ~.c_
IDC
,,-3.,
=.~~ _~ ~ 'T ~ ~ ~ C? CfJ ~,
-----; , ~ , ~_, ,~ _I I ~ I -' I
___. =';:;,.~ I \ ~' I ' :1 1,,-..-' ,
""~=/"l-I l,....". 0-- ~I' ~~ti~tl--j--~~:i~~iQ~~/~~' , -r----l--f--- --0
a . " . /. :.......- '-""-"'-, ,,-- /""""'1 ,~
-'. 14#1'~ ,(1 1:1 ;.....; ....,..Jr1k- .-''---->!I
0-----' rt.. .. ' 1"1, ..;~~ ~L_~______.,..-:~I
I, ,:;,p.---"NtF~ ,:----- --, ---...."H-~f~;Z-~, i -------0
~~~ -~~r'. .::.:.. 1i / i 11l c,;._ "-~:~11 I
__ 1- /. I':; ~ i I : /~ll'
I I' '" . ,/': ~I.I ...~
~~ 4r---I,L." . I' .', [I ,Ij ! / ~ (I l ~j ----- 0
=~ + " 0--'11~1r"l' J !,:tl/',~Fj"7F:~+'0'"
--- 0-----," -----::f- " (l. m: .: - '1 ......:..' /;t ~
;;;;:- \~=-= ,,_c, R:~---1~~=-' "a~ -'~~~r/!pI~" ~ -- ~1~---0
==; l' I /II _ Ii. ~~ iIO"@/I\;7,l j ~- I ~I ~- ~. .
=~jF" ,~ 0-:01 '~~~1~> +. ,~c: ""i~~~c-+~
- _. I! ! ~ / . '11* I' I I' I
1 1 ~ l ' II .! II' ,I.
ii ! -E _____II; I! I! I, 1 I. ! ~ 0
@~~II ~I III
I . . . n- 1 -0
~ : . - 0-' -~~-0----'
-~,,_ _ _~-!#- ,tl.llJii-,.~ TL-ll-J-c::.- 'I.r'-- -.....
1'-tI!;o>- -IN'-" ~ ~.-.
~I--~ /-----4-
I""", ~ """" ~ j(~ '1'1'.... t _ tmli~
CAR WASH C1 .r1 .........TlClIP ~...TlCItl'
-~~~
~_~L
~
12.
~]~
-
ILEY..""",.
...........,...0:
-.. -
\>:51
G
I ml
I !l
II
..
~l
II
III!
.
~ I
; I
= I
zl
~I
-"
...
,
1
11
H
11.;;:'" _
o - ---
o - -..-
a:::
A....
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
G:IPlanning12006IPA06.0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT doc
9
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA06-0048, A REQUEST FOR A DEVELOPMENT
PLAN/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP BUILDING WITH
ASSOCIATED SERVICE FACILITIES TOTALING 32,560
SQUARE FEET ON 3.7 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF YNEZ ROAD AND DLR DRIVE
Section 1. James Cappadocia, representing JHCH Redlands Land Company, LLC,
filed Planning Application No. PA06-0048 on February 22, 2006, in a manner in accord with the
City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
Section 2. Planning Application No. PA06-0048 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA06-0048 on May 17, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter.
Section 4. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission's Hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No.
PA06-0048 subject to the conditions of approval after finding that the project proposed in
Planning Application No. PA06.0048 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code.
Section 5.
by reference.
The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 6. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application
No. PA06-0048 (Development Plan/Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following
findings as required by Sections 17.05.010.F (Development Plan) and 17.04.010.E (Conditional
Use Permit) of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Develooment Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F)
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City;
As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for
Service Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The
General Plan has listed the proposed use as a typical use in the Service Commercial
designation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations outlined in the
Development Code for the Service Commercial zoning district. The Land Use Element
of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with existing
buildings. The proposed automobile dealership is compatible with the surrounding
automobile dealerships and retail buildings located in the vicinity of the project site.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Draft PC Reso.doc
I
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare;
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure
that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with public
health, safety, and welfare.
Conditional Use Permit ICode Section 17.04.010.E\
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the
Development Code;
The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan. The project has been
reviewed for consistency with the General Plan and the project, as conditioned, is
consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan.
B. The proposed minor conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and
development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed minor conditional use
will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures;
The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development
of adjacent uses in the vicinity of the project site, and the proposed use, as conditioned,
will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The conditional use
is consistent with the City's Development Code and is compatible with other activities
approved in the vicinity of the project site.
C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping
and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the
Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood;
The proposed automobile dealership will adequately provide all improvements including
yards, walls, fences, perking, and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and all
other features as required in the Development Code and by the Planning Commission in
order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
D. The nature of the proposed minor conditional use is not detrimental to the health,
safety and general welfare of the community;
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and
general welfare of the community. The project is consistent with the goals and policies
contained within the General Plan and Development Code. These documents were
adopted by the City Council to assure that projects are not detrimental to the health,
safety, and general welfare of the community and compliance with them assures that
this is achieved.
E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a
Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole
before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal;
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Draft PC Reso doc
2
The project has been reviewed, as a whole, in reference to all applicable codes and
ordinances before the Planning Commission.
Section 7. Environmental Comoliance. In accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be Categorically Exempt
from further environmental review (Class 32, Section 15332, In-Fill).
Section 8. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Planning Application No. PA06-0048, a request for a Development
Plan/Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate an automobile dealership building with
associated service facilities totaling 32,560 square feet on 3.7 acres generally located at the
southwest corner of Ynez Road and DLR Drive, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth
on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in
full.
G:\Planning\20()(j\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DF'\Planning\Draft PC Re~o.doc
3
Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission on this 17'" day of May, 2006.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
{SEAL}
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17'" day of May, 2006, by the
following vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Draft PC Reso.doc
4
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Draft PC Reso.doc
5
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA06-0048
Project Description:
A Development Plan/Conditional Use Permit to construct
and operate an automobile dealership building with
associated service facilities totaling 32,560 square feet
on 3.7 acres generally located atthe southwest corner of
Ynez Road and DLR Drive
Assessor's Parcel No.
921-730-066
MSHCP Category:
OfF Category:
Commercial
Retail Commercial (per Development Agreement-
Section 3.1.3.7)
TUMF Category:
Retail Commercial (per Development Agreement-
Section 3.1.2.8)
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
May 17, 2006
May 17, 2008
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-four Dollars ($64.00)
for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as
provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations
Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the
Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall
be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
1
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-OP\Planning\Draft CQAs.doc
2
Planning Department
2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department statt, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of
time, one year at a time.
7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage (Sign program may be required).
8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and
elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
9. The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials,
equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied
by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or
technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the
condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the
real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision
to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Material
Stucco (Main Body)
Stucco (Accents)
Color
ICI Dulux #2013 "White"
ICI Duluz #1679 "Veil"
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-OP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
3
Main Entry Doors
Aluminum Composite Panel (Canopies)
Aluminum Storefront
Window Glazing
Wrought Iron Guardrails
ICI Dulux #1480 "Regatta Bay"
Alpolic "Silver Metallic"
Clear Anodized Aluminum
Clear
Sherwin Williams "Online"
10. Open sections of the parapet along the rooftop parking area, consisting of wrought iron
guardrail, shall occur only at street facing elevations and shall not comprise more than 40
percent of the of the parapet along these elevations.
11. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
13. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These
shall be clearly labeled on site plan.
14. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations, on file with the Planning
Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval.
15. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
16. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this Conditional Use Permit.
17. Any exterior wall or roof mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Exterior building lighting shall be a
decorative type, complimentary to the building. Details of these lights shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for review prior to installation.
Public Works Department
18. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of way.
19. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
20. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
4
21. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent
post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent
non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering any storm drain system or receiving
water.
22. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted to the City. The WQMP will
include site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment
mechanisms.
Building and Safety Department
23. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
24. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on
March 31,2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee
schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
25. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
26. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
27. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
28. Show all building setbacks.
29. Developments with multi-tenant buildings or shell buildings shall provide a house electrical
meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and lire
alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall
clearly show on the plans the location 01 a dedicated panel in place lor the purpose 01 the
operation 01 exterior lighting and lire alarm systems when a house meter is not specilically
proposed.
30. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1 , 1998).
31. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance 01 the building.
32. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda GUP-DP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
5
33. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
34. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays
Fire Prevention
35. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
36. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-JII-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2250 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 700 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2950 GPM with a 3-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A).
37. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x
4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public
streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be
located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access
road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC 903.2,
903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
38. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required (CFC 903.2).
39. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2).
40. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
6
41. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet
(CFC see 902).
42. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1).
43. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC 902.2.1).
Community Services Department
44. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
45. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
46. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
47. All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property
owner.
G:\Planning\2006\PADS-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-OP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
7
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\PJanning\Draft COAs.doc
8
Planning Department
48. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical
plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior
to final agreement with the utility companies.
49. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project
site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subjectto review and approval by the
Director of Planning.
50. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
Public Works Department
51. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
52. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
53. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
54. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
55. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-Q048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Oraft COAs.doc
9
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
56. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading,
Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's
standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
57. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number
(WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Soard (SWRCS). A Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of
construction activities.
58. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
b. Planning Department
c. Department of Public Works
59. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
60. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
61. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the T emecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
62. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
63. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\PJanning\Draft COAs.doc
10
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
11
Planning Department
64. The construction plans shall indicate that all parking spaces designated for employees and
customers will be clearly identified with the use of paint.
65. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not
adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
66. All downspouts shall be internalized.
67. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
c. Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans.
d. One copy of the approved grading plan.
e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
f. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
g. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map.
h. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
68. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire
check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group
utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-
thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and
insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
69. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange".
70. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The numerals shall
be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely
as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP.DP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
12
Public Works Department
71. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401 and 402.
d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
e. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
72. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve DLR Drive (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to include
installation of sidewalk, drainage facilities and utilities (including but not limited to
water and sewer).
73. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: sidewalk, drive
approaches, storm drain facilities, and sewer and domestic water systems.
b. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
74. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
75. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
76. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
77. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Building and Safety Department
78. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
G:\Planning\2006\PAoe.0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Oraft CQAs.doc
13
79. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
80. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review.
81. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
82. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
83. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
84. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Fire Prevention
85. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1).
Community Services Department
86. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
14
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY
THIS PERMIT
G:\Planning\2006\PA06..(){)48 Hine Mazda GUP-OP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
15
Planning Department
87. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant
shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from
view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is
determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet
walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the
developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof
element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning.
88. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
89. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one
year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the
bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
90. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with
disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000."
91. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
92. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed
prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
93. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
Public Works Department
94. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP
have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for
immediate implementation.
G:\Planning\2006\PAOS-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Oraft COAs.doc
16
95. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Public Works Department
96. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
97. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
Fire Prevention
98. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3).
99. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC 901.4.4).
100. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9).
101. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation (CFC Article 10).
102. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door (CFC 902.4).
103. All/any manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC 902.4).
104. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
105. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, building final or occupancy, any buildings
housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of Uniform Fire Code
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP~DP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
17
Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. The storage of
high-piled combustible stock may require structural design considerations or modifications to
the building. Fire protection and life safety features may include some or all of the following:
an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads (CFC Article 81).
106. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection (CFC 105).
107. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of
Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the City; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports (CFC Appendix II-E).
Police Department
108. Upon completion of construction, the building shall have a monitored alarm system installed
and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to notify the
Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices/suites/businesses
located within a specific building should have their own alarm system. Any open service
bays exposed to the elements shall have an alarm system installed and shall be calibrated to
avoid small animals such as squirrels, coyotes, rabbits, etc.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\PJanning\Draft COAs.doc
18
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
G:\P\anning\2006\PAoe-Q048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
19
109. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter from the Rancho California Water District
dated March 8, 2006.
110. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter from the Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District dated March 7, 2006.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\PlanninglDraft COAs.doc
20
@
Rancha
'*
Board of Directors
Ben R. DrakE'
Prl:!Sident
Stephen J. Corona
Sr. VicePresldent
Ralph H. Daily
Lisa D. Herman
John E. Hoagland
Michael R. McMillan
William E. Plummer
Officers:
Brian J. Brady
<kneral Manager
Phillip L. Forbes
Assistant General Manager I
Chief Financial Officer
E. P. "Bob" Lemons
Director ofEngineedng
Perry R. Louck
DtrectorofPlanning
Jeff D. Armstrong
Controller
KelU E. Gal"Cia
District Secretary
C. Michael Cowett
Best Best & Krieger LLP
General Counsel
March 8, 2006
Stuart Fisk, Project Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
~~~~3D~~]
By
Planning Department
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
PROPOSED AUTO DEALERSHIP
PARCEL NO. 10 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23496
APN 921-730-066
CITY PROJECT NO. P A06-0048
[JOHN HINE)
Dear Mr. Fisk:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-
site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD
and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and
requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you should hav~ tL~y questions, please contact -an Engineering Services
Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
7J:l:!E.:W
Development Engineering Manager
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
06\MM:aW56\FEG
Rancho California -,vater District
42135 Winchester RQad . Post Office Bo"{ 9017 . TemllCula. California 925899017 . (951) 296-6900 .. FAX (951) 296-6860
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
General Manager-Chief Engineer
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.955.1200
951.788.9965 FAX
51180_2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Cily of T emecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, Califomia 92589-9033
Attention: Sj\I\l<1L--T 0 s,.\l-
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
:P AD" - 00'f9
The District does not nonnally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities.
The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood
hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are nonnally limited to ttems of
s~cific inte~~t to tf:1e District indudif)g District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control af)d
drainage faCIlities which could be conSidered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and Dlstnct
Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, infonnation of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project With respect to flood hazard, public health
and safety or any other such Issue:
No comment.
This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regionalmterest proposed. .
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels, stonn drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be
conSidered regional in nature andlor a logical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership ot such taCllltles on wntten request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection Will be
required (or District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
This project is located within the limits of the District's ,^1\ll-r-1~tJt#t--rt+\~w.. ./""WY Area
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; appllcaOle iees ShoulO Oe palo oy caShierS check
or money order only to the FloOd Control District or City prior to issuance of grading permits. Fees to be paid
should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit.
An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right
of way or facilities. For further infonnation, contact the District's encroachment permit section at
951.955.1266.
$..
L
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recoreation, or other final approval should not be given until the City
has detennined that the project has been grantee a pennit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and olher infonnation required to meet FEMA
requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior
to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this pro!'ect, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Departmen of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Pennit from.the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating
the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be
requiree from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 pennit.
Very truly yours,
c:
;;zk ~
rnl rfS (~ ~ fj \\;7 p
~ul L:::3\...:;:::7 is ,j :.; c.:.::
~ "'"--' .
d P . ..'_ _,
U n t;1f2, R 0 ~_-~ 20nB
Riverside County Planning Department
Alln: David Mares
ARTURO DIAZ
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: 3--;7-- po? b'
A:-M
By -;---__~A~_ ~ _',,_.___,_
1-'/;::..nmnt;J Dspartme:-i:
ATTACHMENT NO.4
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
10
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
John Hine Mazda of Temecula
Responses to Section I ofthe Conditional use permit.
The operation of a new auto dealership known as John Hine Mazda Temecula located in
the new Auto Plaza on Parcel F at the south west comer ofDlr road and Ynez.
The proposed hours of operation will be as follows.
Parts & Service M-F 7am-6pm Sat 8am-5pm
Sales M-F 8:30am-9pm Sat 8:30 am-7pm Sun 10:00 am-6pm
There will be approximately thirty five employees located at this facility.
The required parking shall be 175 spaces for new used and employee parking.
Equipment used for this new car dealership will be typical in nature to all other
dealerships. Service department will have lifts, air compressors, air tools, and associated
other equipment required to operate a service department.
The new car showroom will use typical equipment necessary to perform administrative
tasks.
Known hazardous materials for the operation of this business would be (solvents, grease,
oils and cleaning liquids). A fuel tank will also be installed approximately 500 gallons for
the operation. This facility will not have a paint or collision center.
We estimate an average of approximately 60 daily trips generated by service customers
and parts deliveries.
If further information is required please contact me at the number listed below
Sincerely,
Jim Cappadocia
Construction Manager
Email iimcaoo(a)cox.net
Phone 619843-8597
ATTACHMENT NO.5
FAST TRACK SCHEDULE
G:\Planning\2006IPA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DPIPlanningIPC STAFF REPORT-doc
11
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive - PO Box 9033 - Temecula - California 92589-9033
(951) 694-6400 - FAX (951) 694-6477
April 21, 2006
Mr. Jim Cappadocia
25847 Bellemore Drive
Ramona, CA 92065
SUBJECT: Revised Fast Track Schedule and Contract for Mazda Dealership, Planning
Application No. PA06-0048 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
Dear Mr. Cappadocia:
On February 22, 2006, you submitted a Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan Application for
the above-referenced development project. Based on this submittal date, staff provides the
following fast track processing schedule and contract:
. February 22, 2006: Complete application submitted
. March 9, 2006: DRC meeting held (staff)
. April 19, 2006: Corrections and revised plans submitted (applicant)
. April 24, 2006: Submit grading plans to Public Works Department (applicant)
Submit building plans to Building & Safety (applicant)
. April 26, 2006:
. April 27, 2006:
. May 17, 2006:
. June 1, 2006:
. June 5, 2006:
Departmental conditions of approval due (staff)
Public Notice prepared (staff)
Planning Commission public hearing
Close of appeal period
Grading Permit issuance
Building Permit issuance
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0048 Hine Mazda CUP-DP\Planning\Fas[ Track Contract.doc
I