HomeMy WebLinkAbout110106 PC AgendaB
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Roll Call:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you
desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
November 1, 2006 — 6:00 P.M.
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 06-60
Commissioner Harter
Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission
Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of October 18, 2006
R:\PLANCOMM\Agendas\2006\11-01.06.doc
1
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or
in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an
appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days
after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning
Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
New Items
2 Planning Application No. PA06-0082, a Maior Modification to a Development Plan to add
3,089 square feet of building area, remove and replace the service area canopy and add a
new parapet wall along the new building areas of an existing automobile dealership, located
at 26845 Ynez Road, Stuart Fisk, Associate Planner.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Wednesday, November 15, 2006, 6:00 p.m., Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\PLANCOMM Agendas\2006\11-01-06.doc
2
ITEM #1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 18, 2006
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on
Wednesday, October 18, 2006, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Guerriero thanked Ms. Craig for the prelude music.
ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners: Carey, Telesio, Harter, Chiniaeff, and Chairman Guerriero.
Absent None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of September 20, 2006.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2 Director's Hearing Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and File Director's Hearing Update for September.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to receive and file this report.
R:iMinutesPC\101806 1
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
New Items
3 Planning Application No PA06-0213, a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit,
submitted by Clearwater Waterpark Development, for the construction of a 13,000 square
foot water park on approximately 15 acres consisting of pools, slides, and other types of
water rides. other buildings and an associated parking lot, located at the northwest
intersection of Ynez Road and County Center Drive
By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Associated Planner Damko highlighted the following:
o Location
o Site Plan
o Buffering/Landscaping
o Architecture
o Slides/Water Rides
o Conditional Use
o Environmental Determination
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's query regarding CC&Rs, Assistant City Attorney Lee
stated that the CC&Rs would be between the property owners and the Homeowners
Association, advising that the City would not be involved.
For Commissioner Telesio, Associated Planner Damko noted that the proposed project would
generate Tess traffic than any other permitted use.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Dan Hunter, representing Clearwater Waterpark Development, offered the following
comments:
o That the project would be a family-oriented attraction
o That the target market would be parents and children 12 years of age and younger
o That the applicant would be investing over 13million dollars in the proposed project
o That the proposed property will be highly landscaped and well maintained
o That it would be the opinion of the applicant that the project will have a positive impact
on the community, enhancing the City of Temecula
o That the admission fee would eliminate questionable characters
o That the perimeter will be secured
o That the applicant would be of the opinion that there will not be individuals loitering in the
parking lot
o That the parking lot will be monitored throughout the day
o That the applicant has been sensitive to the number of parking spaces and therefore,
has exceeded the City's parking standards
o That the traffic resulting from the proposed project will be off peak from 10:00 a.m. to
8:00 p.m.
o That water parks have evolved into the preferred form of family recreation; and that such
facilities would be clean, safe and provide wholesome family interactive fun
R:VdinutesPC\101806
2
o That the core of customers would be generated by the local community and would not
be based on tourism
o That the proposed project would work on a seasonal schedule open to the public
approximately 110 days a year from Memorial Day to Labor or Day
o That the attractions at the proposed water park will be safe, multirider attractions that
parents and children will enjoy together
o That Clearwater Development would focus on safety and family-oriented entertainment
o That the pay only parking lot will be a self-contained and controlled environment
o That the parking lot will be monitored by security to ensure the safety of the guests and
the positive image of Splash Canyon in Temecula
o That the teens of Temecula will be interested in the employment opportunities of Splash
Canyon in Temecula
o That the proposed project will be employing 300 youth each summer
o That Splash Canyon would be a positive community partner that would make
contributions to the community by providing fundraising events
o That Wild Rivers Irvin has had long-term relationships with charitable organizations
o That during the off-season, Clearwater Development will make the facilities available to
the Temecula Fire Department and other law enforcement agencies for training
purposes
o That Clearwater Development would be providing a first-class, family-oriented form of
recreation.
For the Commission, Commissioner Telesio advised that he had an opportunity to attend a
meeting with the applicant, Council Member Naggar, Director of Planning Ubnoske, and a
representative of the business park.
In response to Commissioner Telesio's questions, Mr. Hunter and Mr. Briggs offered the
following comments:
o That the rides in the park would be targeted for parents with children 12 years and
younger
o That the business performa would be based on Temecula and the surrounding areas,
and that Splash Canyon would not be dependent on tourism
o That the park will be built, managed, and maintained with the assumption that there were
no parents in the park to supervise their children
o That the park will be fully staffed
o That an electronic locating system will be put on the kids for tracking purposes
o That 15 plus fulltime employees will be maintaining the park throughout the year
o That during the off-season there would not be water in any of the pools
o That the applicant would consider using the parking lot for a park -n -ride during the off-
season if that would be the desire of the Planning Commission
o That the cost of parking will be separate from the cost of admission, but could be
incorporated into one fee if necessary.
For Commissioner Harter, Mr. Briggs noted the following:
o That there would be park security 24 hours a day when the pools are operational; and
that during the winter hours there would no night security in the park
R:WInutesPC\101808
3
o That the applicant would not anticipate to have problems in the park, but that if a
problem were to arise, the applicant would take measures to provide security and
resolve the problem
o That in the event that the parking lot would reach its capacity, prearranged parking from
another business would be an option, but that this would not be anticipated
o That Splash Canyon in Temecula would not be selling alcohol on site.
Referencing Commissioner Carey's queries, Mr. Hunter noted the following:
o That based on a Noise Study that was prepared, the project would generate a maximum
noise level of 65 dBA at the property lines with mitigation measures, which would be less
than the maximum threshold limit of 70 dBA specified in the General Plan Noise Element
o That the applicant will establish a noise complaint response program and will respond to
any noise complaints received
o That the applicant would provide its own security
o That the proposed water park would be anticipated to generate significantly less traffic
on an annual basis than any other allowed use
o That security would be employed by adults, not teenagers.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's comments, Mr. Briggs noted that the applicant will be
installing center islands going into Ynez Road.
Mr. Briggs noted that if patrons were to park on the north side of the proposed park, the
applicant would be willing to staff the area with security or construct a 7' block wall and advised
that there will not be a drop-off area provided.
Chairman Guerriero expressed his enthusiasm with the applicant's willingness to address any
traffic or parking issues that may arise and that he would request that the signage program be
brought back to the Planning Commission for review.
Mr. Hunter relayed that with regard to signage, the desire would be to have freeway visibility
and a monument sign that would be consistent with the City's Development Pian.
Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that a Condition of Approval could be imposed to have the
applicant return with its sign program for the Planning Commission to review.
By way of overheads, Mr. Joshua Hunter pointed out for Commissioner Chiniaeff the various
emergency exits that would be imposed on the project and noted that there would be a
reciprocal parking agreement in place with an adjacent property owner.
For Chairman Guerriero, Mr. Briggs noted that trauma equipment, and an Emergency Medical
Technician (EMT) will be on the park premises during working hours, and advised that AED
equipment will also bean site.
At 7:00 p.m., the Planning Commission took a break and retumed to the dais at 7:07 p.m.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to the proposed project:
R:VdinutesPC\101808
4
o Mr. Tim Sommerville, Temecula
o Mr. Norman Nelson, Temecula
o Mr. Urs Aeberli, Temecula
o Ms. Jan Nelson, Temecula
o Mr. Rob Leanza, Temecula
o Mr. Dave Wesley, Murrieta
o Ms. Vickie Walker, Temecula
o Mr. Jesse Simms, Temecula
The above-mentioned individuals opposed to the proposed project for the following reasons:
o That the proposed water park would create a negative affect on the adjacent businesses
o That although a water park would enhance the community and provide employment
opportunities for the City's youth, the location would not be ideal
o That the ingress and egress at the proposed site would not be adequate to
accommodate the traffic that the proposed water park would create
o That the proposed project would not be consistent with the surrounding area
o That teenagers loitering and skateboarding in the parking lot would be of great concem
o That the proposed project will create noise congestion, vandalism, and safety concerns
for the adjacent businesses
o That patrons of the proposed project will be parking in the parking lots of the adjacent
businesses
o That the proposed project will create a negative impact and a depreciation of homes for
the Harvestori Community.
Clarifying for the speakers, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that the proposed project would
be a private project and that the City would not be participating in this project.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
Further clarifying, Associate Planner Damko noted that the closest Harveston home would be
located more than 1,800 feet away from the proposed project.
Offering a rebuttal, Mr. Briggs noted the following:
o That the price of the admission would be determined by the height of the patron
o That a season price will be offered to the residents of Temecula
o That the proposed project would be a local -driven amusement park, noting that only 4
percent of the patrons will come from outside of the community
o That the season of the proposed water park cannot be extended; that the season would
be tied to the schooldistrict's school year; and that once school is in session there would
not be any patrons to attend or employees to work
o That due to site limitations, the proposed park cannot be expanded.
Mr. Hunter noted that the proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and Design Guidelines and would encourage the Planning Commission to
approve the proposed project.
R:\MinutesPC\101606 5
Stating that although he would not be opposed to a water park in the City of Temecula,
Commissioner Chiniaeff did express concern with the location and the traffic impacts it may
have on the adjacent businesses.
Commissioner Harter stated that from his personal experience with the Wild Rivers in Irvine, the
water park would be a well-run, maintained facility that would provide many employment
opportunities for Temecula's youth as well as provide wholesome family entertainment; and
therefore, he concurred that the proposed use may create traffic, but that the traffic would be
less in the four month period than it would be with any other permitted use.
Concurring with Commissioner Chiniaeff's comment that the proposed project may create some
traffic impacts on the adjacent businesses, Commissioner Carey stated that any other permitted
use would generate more impacts on a daily basis; and relayed that he would be in favor of the
proposed project, noting that it would be a benefit to the community.
Referencing potential traffic impacts that may be created by the proposed project,
Commissioner Telesio reiterated that the site would be zoned Service Commercial and that
Sports and Recreational Facilities would be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit; that the
proposed water park would be consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and
Design Guidelines, and would generate less traffic than any other permitted use. Commissioner
Telesio also reminded the Commission that the facility would only be open from Memorial Day
to Labor Day 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Echoing Commissioner Telesio's comments, Chairman Guerriero was also of the opinion that
the proposed use would be a benefit to the whole community; and that it would be a permitted
use that would generate less traffic than any other permitted use.
MOTION: Chairman Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Harter
seconded the motion. (Following additional discussion voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.)
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to impose the following on the applicant: that
another emergency pedestrian gate access toward the center of the park (southerly property
line); that signage be brought to the Planning Commission for review; that the applicant provide
a park -n -ride on the property during its off season; and that the applicant consider an inclusive
price for admission and parking.
At this time, the voice vote on the previously made motion reflected unanimous approval.
RAMinutesPC\1 01806 6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA 06-0213, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE SITE DEVELOPMENT AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A 13,000 SQUARE FOOT WATER PARK
ON 15.4 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD. AND COUNTY CENTER
DRIVE CONSISTING OF POOLS, SLIDES, AND OTHER TYPES
OF WATER RIDES, CONCESSION STANDS, GIFT SHOP,
PARTY ROOM, CHANGING ROOM WITH LOCKERS,
RESTROOM, PICNIC AREAS, SERVICE YARD, AND PARKING
LOT. THE WATER PARK WILL BE OPERATING
APPROXIMATELY FOUR MONTHS OF THE CALENDAR
YEAR. THE PARK WILL BE OPEN FROM MEMORIAL DAY TO
LABOR DAY FROM 10:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. IT IS
ANTICIPATED THAT THE PARK WILL RETAIN 15 FULL TIME
STAFF AND 300 SEASONAL EMPLOYEES.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
For Commissioner Harter, Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that the colors of the windows
and doors at the Hooter's restaurant would remain the same and that the columns would be
repainted.
In response to Commissioner Carey's question regarding the colors of Marie Calendar's
Restaurant on Ynez Road and Rancho Califomia Road, Director of Planning Ubnoske stated
that the owner of the restaurant was given a choice to either repaint the restaurant to the
approved color palette or leave it as is and appeal to the Planning Commission; and noted that
staff has not heard the owner's response.
Commissioner Carey thanked staff for the installation of a safety fence around the BJ's
Restaurant on Ynez Road and also expressed concern with the amount of used RVs and boats
in the parking lot of the Home Depot on SR 79 South.
Referencing Commissioner Carey's concern, Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that Home
Depot is not in compliance with the City's Development Code and therefore, is being charged
$1,000 a day until compliance is met.
The Planning Commission welcomed newly hired Junior Planner Lowrey.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that the City's Principal Planner position will be opened
as of Sunday, October 22, 2006:
R:VntinutesPC\101806 7
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:00 p.m., Chairman Guerriero formally adjourned to November 1. 2006, at 6:00 p.m., in the
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Ron Guerriero
Chairman
R:VulinutesPC\101806 8
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
ITEM #2
DATE OF MEETING:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
CEOA:
STAFF REPORT — PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
November 1, 2006
Stuart Fisk TITLE: Senior Planner
Planning Application No. PA06-0082, a Major Modification to a
Development Plan to add 3,089 square feet of building area to
an existing automobile dealership building, to remove and
replace the service area canopy at the service writer area, and
to add a new parapet wall along the new building areas of an
automobile dealership located at 26845 Ynez Road
0 Approve with Conditions
❑ Deny
❑ Continue for Redesign
❑ Continue to:
❑ Recommend Approval with Conditions
❑ Recommend Denial
® Categorically Exempt (Section) 15301
(Class) 1
O Notice of Determination (Section)
❑ Negative Declaration
❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Pian
❑ El
GAPlanning‘2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD\PIanning\PC_STAFF_REPORT.doc
1
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant:
Date of Completion:
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning Designation:
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site: Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge Automobile Dealership
Staubach Co.; Michael Palmer
March 28, 2006
November 10, 2006
Service Commercial (SC)
Service Commercial (SC)
North:
South:
East:
West:
Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep Automobile Dealership
Rancho Ford Automobile Dealership
Paradise Chevrolet and Carriage Motor Company Automobile Dealerships
Interstate 15
Lot Area:
Total Floor Area/Ratio:
Landscape Area/Coverage:
Parking Required/Provided:
4.4 acres
30,827 square feet/0.15 FAR
26,452 square feet/13.9%
150 spaces required/176 spaces provided (excluding
inventory and display spaces)
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The proposed project involves an existing automobile dealership building and is a request by
Staubach Company to add 3,089 square feet of building area to an existing automobile
dealership building, to remove and replace the service area canopy at the service writer area,
and to add a new parapet wall along the new building areas of the building located at 26845
Ynez Road.
The site is currently utilized as a Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge dealership, but will be changed to
exclusively a Dodge dealership. On March 16, 2006, the Planning Commission approved a
similar application for an existing building to the north of the project site. The building to the
north of the project site will house a Chrysler/Jeep dealership, thereby allowing for expansion
of the Dodge operation on the project site. The proposed building elevation revisions will serve
to establish a visual relationship with the Chrysler/Jeep dealership to the north. An outdoor
display area at the front of the building will be enclosed to provide additional indoor display
area, and the service writer area at the south side of the building will be revised to reconfigure
the canopy area and to add interior area.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the
applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MODWIanning\PC_STAFF_REPORT.doc
2
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The proposed Major Modification will result in changes to the existing site plan, including the
enclosure of a currently roofed outdoor display area at the front of the building and the
reconfiguration of the service writer area to remove and replace the service writer area canopy
and to add interior area. The building meets the minimum setback requirements of the
Development Code and the proposed lot coverage of 15.3 percent is below the maximum
allowed lot coverage of 30 percent. The on-site parking areas will not be altered, with the
exception of minor revisions to parking spaces in the vicinity of the service writer area to
accommodate the revised service writer configuration. Staff has determined the proposed
dealership requires 150 parking spaces (excluding inventory spaces) and 176 spaces are
being provided for customers and employees. Access to the site will not be altered, nor will the
location of display, sales, or service areas on site and within the building.
Architecture
The proposed building design is consistent with the Development Code and Design
Guidelines, and is compatible with the automobile dealerships and service buildings in the
surrounding area. The proposed -building elevation revisions consist of enclosing a roofed
outdoor display area at the front of the building with a glass storefront and a new entryway and
reconfiguring the service writer area to remove and replace the service area canopy and to
add interior area. The proposed building elevation revisions will provide multiple building
planes, varied parapet height, and significant window area at the showroom portions of the
elevations. The revised entryway at the east elevation of the building will create a focal point
for the main entry.
Building materials for the new portions of the building will be consistent with the existing
portions of the building, and the proposed exterior colors and materials are consistent with the
automobile dealership buildings in the surrounding area. The main body of the stucco and
masonry walls will be painted Frazee "Intercoastal Gray". The stucco at the main entry area of
the building will be painted Frazee "Olde Fashion". The proposed storefront consists of
anodized aluminum frames with "Visteon Grey" tinted glass.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been
deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Class 1, Section 15301,
Existing Facilities).
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution
approving the Major Modification with the attached Conditions of Approval.
GAPlanning\200061PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD1PIanning\PC_STAFF_REPORT.doc
3
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.O10.F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City.
The proposed building revisions are consistent with the General Plan land use policies
for Service Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as
well as the use regulations outlined in the Development Code for the Service
Commercial zoning district. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that
proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed building
revisions are compatible with the surrounding automobile dealerships and service
buildings located in the vicinity of the project site.
2. Theoverall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure
that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with
public health, safety, and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map — Blue Page 5
2. Existing Elevations — Blue Page 6
3. Plan Reductions — Blue Page 7
4. PC Resolution 06-_ — Blue Page 8
Exhibit A — Draft Conditions of Approval
GAPlanning\20061PA08-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOMPIanningWC_STAFF_REPORT.doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO.1
VICINITY MAP
G:Wlanning\2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD\Planning\PC_STAFF_REPORT.doc
5
VICINITY MAP
PA06-0082
DCH Dodge
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
G:\Planning2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD\PIanning\PC_STAFF_REPORT.doc
6
•
•
•
•
Q3LYI0098Y • .&ano.INVtl / tl3M-YM
sear sa
•
-30000
dlf1OEW31 HOa
11111111
SNOLLYA313 U01U31X3 ONLLSIX3
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLAN REDUCTIONS
G:\Planning\2006\PA06A082 DCH Dodge Major MOD \Planning PC_STAFF_REPORT.doc
7
U
831VIOO93V • LIfO'JNVU / UEWIVM
11.011-0119. 'COO
■
V1f1O31131 HOG
11
1
ccccc
1
3
1
1
NVId 3JJS
831VI000SV • IUflOONVU / tl3IIlYM
1.10.1....
30000 '
V1f1O3W31 HOO®
3
au
1
1
NYId IOOld ONf1OHO
•
1
II
it
1,
11
I+S,
s
Iii li Si
!� I I1
ll 11 I frill
its oh,1!11t
i P!SlSi i
1i is (midi !il!
0
1
1731;1.001"17; • 1llllOSNVU 77i7RZ,
1•11.••••• 4004
on
E
1
0
0
0
x90000
V11103W31
WOW! PRIM
0
O
it
C
c«1
1
1
1
1
NOIJVA313 UOI1:131X3
IIIIIIIIIII
B31V1008s7• 1UAOONVU / UEWWM
1
a0000
®
V111O3W31 Hoa
441
113
Ii1
r
Di
ILp
'frit1
SNOLLO3S
Di
3
3
1
JL
Id
SECTION 'C'
Id
SECTION 'C'
ATTACHMENT NO.4
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD \PIanningWC_STAFF_REPORT.doc
8
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA06-0082, A REQUEST FOR A MAJOR MODIFICATION
TO A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ADD 3,089 SQUARE FEET OF
BUILDING AREA TO AN EXISTING AUTOMOBILE
DEALERSHIP BUILDING, TO REMOVE AND REPLACE THE
SERVICE AREA CANOPY AT THE SERVICE WRITER AREA,
AND TO ADD A NEW PARAPET WALL ALONG THE NEW
BUILDING AREAS OF AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP
Section 1. Michael Palmer of Staubach Company, representing DCH Investments,
Inc., filed Planning Application No. PA06-0082 on March 28, 2006, in a manner in accord with
the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
Section 2. Planning Application No. PA06-0082 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA06-0082 on November 1, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed
by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter.
Section 4. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission's Hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No.
PA06-0082 subject to the Conditions of Approval after finding that the project proposed in
Planning Application No. PA06-0082 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code.
Section 5. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
by reference.
Section 6. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application
No. PA06-0082 (Major Modification to a' Development Plan), hereby makes the following
findings as required by Sections 17.05.010.F (Development Plan) of the Temecula Municipal
Code.
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F)
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City;
The proposed building revisions are consistent with the General Plan land use policies
for Service Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well
as the use regulations outlined in the Development Code for the Service Commercial
zoning district.. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed
buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed building revisions am
compatible with the surrounding automobile dealerships and service buildings located in
the vicinity of the project site.
G:1Planning\20061PA06-0082-DCH Dodge Major MOD\Planning\Dra(LPC_Reso.doc
1
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare;
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure
that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with public
health, safety, and welfare.
Section 7. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be Categorically Exempt
from further environmental review (Class 1, Section 15301, Existing Facilities).
Section 8. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Planning Application No. PA06-0082, a request for a Major
Modification to a Development Plan to add 3,089 square feet of building area to an existing
automobile dealership building, to remove and replace the service area canopy at the service
writer area, and to add a new parapet wall along the new building areas of an automobile
dealership located at 26845. Ynez Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on
Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
G:Wlanning\2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOMPIanning\Draff_PC_Reso.doc
2
Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 1st day of November, 2006.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 06- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18' day of
November, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning12006PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MODV'Ianning\DratLPC_Reso.doc
3
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
GAPlanning\2006PPA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD\PIanning\Dra(f_PC_Reso.doc
4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA06-0082
Project Description: A Major Modification to a Development Plan to add 3,200
square feet of building area to an existing automobile
dealership building, to remove and replace the service
area canopy at the service writer area, and to add a new
parapet wall along the new building areas of an
automobile dealership located at 26845 Ynez Road
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-720-001
MSHCP Category: NA
DIF Category: Retail Commercial
TUMF Category: Retail Commercial
Approval Date: November 1, 2006
Expiration Date: November 1, 2008
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of $64.00. for the County
administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public
Resources Code Section 21152 and Califomia Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within
said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of
failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
G:V'Ianning' 2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD\PIanning\DrattCOAs.doc
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD\PIanning\Dra COAs.doc
2
Planning Department
2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the Final Conditions of Approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
6 The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of
time, one year at a time.
7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and
elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
9. The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials,
equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied
by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or
technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the
condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the
real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision
to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Material
Stucco and Masonry (Main Body)
Stucco (Main Entry)
Aluminum Storefront
Window Glazing
G:\Planning2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD\PIanning\Draft COAs.doc
3
Color
Frazee "intercoastal Gray"
Frazee "Olde Fashion"
Clear Anodized Aluminum
"Visteon Grey" tinted glass
10. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
11. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this Major Modification.
Public Works Department
12. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls and permanent
post -construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent
non -permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering any storm drain system or receiving
water.
Building and Safety Department
13. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 Edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
14. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on
March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance No. 03-01 and the
fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
15. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street -lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
16. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety Department to ensure the paymentor exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
17. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
18. Show all building setbacks.
19. Developments with Multi -tenant Buildings or Shell Buildings shall provide a house electrical
meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire
alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with Single User Buildings shall
clearly show on the plans the location of a dedicated panel in place for thepurpose of the
operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically
proposed.
20. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998).
21. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
G:\Planning\2006'iPA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD \PIanning\Draft_COAs.doc
4
22. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
23. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
24. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday -Friday 6:30 a.m. — 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. — 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Govemment Holidays
Fire Prevention
25. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), Califomia Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
26. During remodeling and/or addition construction ALL FIRE and LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS will
be maintained in working order and up to their original design and performance
specifications (CFC art.87 et al).
27. During building construction, all locations where structures are to be built or altered shall
maintain approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
28. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1).
29. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
30. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection (CFC 105).
Community Services Department
31. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
32. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. Details of the ordinance can be
located on the City's website atwww.cityoftemecula.org; under Chapter 5.08 of the municipal
code.
GAPlanning\2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD \Planning\Draft_COAs.doc
5
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:\Planning‘2006\PA06-0062 OCR Dodge Major MOD\PIanning\Draft_COAs.doc
6
Planning Department
33. The construction plans shall indicate that all parking spaces designated for employees and
customers will be clearly identified with the use of paint.
34. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
35. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a nine -inch grid pattern with 45 -inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals
shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied
over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as
closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
Public Works Department
36. A revised grading plan shall be submitted and approved.
37. Construction -phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading,
Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's
standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
38. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
39. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with; Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06 for the added building square footage.
40. The Developer shall pay to the City the Westem Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Building and Safety Department
41. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
42. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
Edition of the Califomia Building Code Appendix 29.
43 Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review.
44 Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
45. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
46. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
G:\Planning\2006WA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD \Planning\Drafl_COAs.doc
7
47. A pre -construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Community Services Department
48. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
G:\Planning\20061PA08-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD \Planning\Draff_COAs.doc
8
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY
OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT
G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD\PIanning\DratLCOAs.doc
9
Planning Department
49. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant
shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from
view of the adjacent public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any
mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from
any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide
screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening if
reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning.
50. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with
disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000."
51. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
three square feet in size.
52. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed
prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
53. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
Public Works Department
54. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP
have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for
immediate implementation.
55. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
Fire Prevention
56. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, 'Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3).
57. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
GAPlanning\20061PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD \PIanning\Drail_COAs.doc
10
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi -family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC 901.4.4).
58. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system for
all areas of new construction. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention
Bureau for approval prior to installation (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9).
59. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or. use, the developer shall install a new or
upgrade the current fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory
listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval
prior to installation (CFC Article 10).
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these Conditions of Approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature Date
Applicant's Printed Name
_ G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0082 DCH Dodge Major MOD\ Planning'DrafLCOAs.doc
11