HomeMy WebLinkAbout110707 PC Agenda
.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
November 7, 2007 - 6:00 P.M.
********
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 07-43
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Commissioner Carey
RollCall:
Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you
desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission
Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
"
1.1 Approve the Minutes of October 3, 2007
1.2 Approve the Minutes of October 17, 2007
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendasI2007\ 11-07 -o7.doc
2 Director's HearinQ Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and File Director's Hearing Update for October
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or
in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an
appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days
after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning
Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
Continued from October 17, 2007
3 PlanninQ Application No. PA07-0176. a Development Plan. submitted bv Walt Allen
Architects, for an 11.456 SQuare foot expansion to the existinQ Temecula StaQe Stop
complex to include the addition of a 4.257 SQuare foot office retail buildinQ. a 3.328 SQuare
foot second floor expansion over the existinq Temecula Wine and Beer Garden, and 3.871
SQuare feet of associated improvements. located at 28464 Old Town Front Street. Dana
Schuma. Associate Planner.
New Item
4 PlanninQ Application No. PA07-0180. a Maior Modification. submitted bv Joseph Jaworski.
to construct a 4.034 SQuare foot First Bank buildinQ with drive-thru. located on the northeast
corner of Winchester and Nicolas Roads in the Rancho Temecula Town Center. Chervl
Kitzerow/Matt Peters. Associate Planners.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 6:00 p.m., Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendasI2007\11-07-07.doc
2 ;
ITEM #1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2007
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Chiniaeff thanked Ms. Craig for the prelude music.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Telesio, Chairman Chiniaeff.
Absent:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of September 5, 2007.
1.2 Approve the Minutes of September 19,2007.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Chairman
Chiniaeff who abstained on Item No. 1.1 and Commissioner Harter who abstained on Item No.
1.2.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
2 Planning Application No. PA07-0252. a Development AQreement Amendment. submitted bv
Winchester Hills I. LLC. to amend fee timing thresholds related to buildinQ permit issuance
on the Winchester Hills Development Agreement located within the Harveston Specific Plan
service commercial area, located on the northwest corner and southwest corner of Date
Street and Ynez Road
R:\MinutesPC\100307
By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Associate Planner Damko highlighted the following aspects
of staffs report (of record):
. Project Description
. Background
. Location
. Service Commercial Permitted Uses
. Fee Deferral Agreement
. Environmental Determination
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
A. Mr. Stephen Bieri, applicant, expressed concurrence with staffs report.
B. Mr. Lee Kenniston, Temecula, spoke in favor of the proposed project.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to the proposed project:
C. Mr. Mark Coleman, Temecula
D. Ms. Kyle Coleman, Temecula
E. Mr. Steve Crouse, Temecula
F. Ms. Ronda Ackerman, Temecula
G. Mr. Chad Jeffrey, Temecula
H. Ms. Tasha Roberts, Temecula,
I. Mr. Jon Roberts, Temecula
The above-mentioned individuals spoke in opposition for the following reasons:
· That a car dealership would not be compatible with a residential community
. That a car dealership will create too much traffic for the area
. That test drives of vehicles will take place in residential communities which may pose a
problem for young children playing in the street
· That because car dealerships do not offer sufficient parking for its customers and
employees, customers and employees will be forced to park in adjacent communities
· That a Mercedes Benz dealership will create a high crime factor that could spill into
adjacent communities
. That adjacent residential communities will be subjected to bright lights during the
evening hours
A petition of 100 signatures of the Harveston residents opposing the Mercedes Benz dealership
was provided.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
R:\MinutesPC\ 100307
2
From a Public Works perspective, Deputy Director of Public Works York stated the following:
. That the Development Agreement being considered would not be considering parking at
this time, noting that this will be addressed at another time
. That there would not be an intention to provide access or parking along Ynez Road
. That the grading activity on the property is due to Lennar's commitment to clean the site
. That with respect to Ynez Road and whether or not it will go through, it would be on the
City of Murrieta's Circulation Element.
In response to Commissioner Harter, Assistant City Attorney Lee advised that the proposal
tonight would be for the Amendment to the Development Agreement indicating that the proposal
for a Mercedes Benz Dealership would be at a future date.
Chairman Chiniaeff added that the proposal.would be for the Development Amendment
Agreement, not for the approval of any use.
MOTION: Commissioner Harter moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-39
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0252)"
3 PlanninQ Application Nos. PA07-0084 and PA07-0085. a Tentative Parcel Map and
Development Plan. submitted bv Bob Crisell of Rancho View Professional Center. to
subdivide a 5.3 acre parcel into two lots and construct a three-story 50.000 square foot
office buildinQ and a three-story 35,000 square foot office building, located on the southwest
corner of Rancho California Road and MoraQa Road
Junior Planner Lowrey provided a staff report, highlighting the following aspects:
. Project Description
. Locations
. Existing Conditions
. Site Plan
. Landscape Plans
. Architecture
. . Environmental Determination
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
A. Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, stated the applicant's concurrence with
staffs Conditions of Approval, and noted that he would be available for questions.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
R:\MinutesPC\100307
3
MOTION: Commissioner Carey moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-40
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA07-0085, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A
THREE-STORY 35,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING
AND THREE-STORY 50,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON A
5.3 ACRE SITE, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD (APN
944-290-022)
4 Plannina Application Nos. PA06-0346, PA07-0231, and PA07-0194. a Development Plan.
Minor Exception to reduce the rear yard setback. and Sian Proaram, submitted bv Siirk
Ziilstra representing Ziilstra Architecture, for a commercial shopping center consistina of five
single-storv buildinas on a 4.3 acre lot within the Chaparral Villaae shoppina center. located
adiacent to the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road
Associate Planner Damko, by way of PowerPoint Presentation highlighted on the following:
. Project Description
. Location
. Site Conditions
. Development Site Plan
. Architecture
. Signage
Ms. Damko indicated that staff had a concern with the proposed cabinet Denny's sign and
recommended that the Planning Commission condition a channel lettering for Denny's signage.
In response to a letter received from the adjacent homeowners' association and its attorney
regarding a concern with a common area slope adjacent to the proposed Chaparral Village
project, Associate Planner Damko advised that a Condition of Approval was added that would
require that: the applicant shall work with surrounding Homeowners Association and strive for a
mutual agreement to the design of the construction grading and construction landscape plans;
that any offsite grading will require property owner approval; that any disturbance to offsite
landscaping shall be replaced; and the applicant of the proposal would be in agreement of the
added Condition of Approval.
Commissioner Guerriero relayed the importance of there not being a line of site problem with
the installation of a monument sign.
Chairman Chiniaeff expressed concern with the proposed colors of the background of the
monument sign and requested that a more muted sign palette be imposed.
In response to a question from the Planning 'Commission, Associate Planner Damko noted that
decorative awnings and lighting will be placed to conceal man-doors.
R:\MinutesPC\100307
4
By way of photographs, Associate Planner Damko provided examples of signage from various
Denny's Restaurants.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
A. Mr. Dick Bridy, owner of the property, stated that the proposed sign age would be
consistent with the signage across the street (Rancho Temecula Towne Center) and adjacent to
the proposed site; and that with respect to the colors, he would like to give the tenants the ability
to use their logos and corporate colors.
B. Mr. Bob Sandberg, Franchise Signs International, advised that his company supplies
Denny's corporate and franchise signs throughout the United States; and noted that it would be
his opinion that the colors would be in conformance with the City's Development Code.
C. Ms. Brenda Yanoschik, property owner of Parcel No.1, advised for the record that she
has been working with the applicant of the proposed project; that she requests that after
relocation of the easement, that it not be relocated to another location in the future; or that the
limited number of drive aisles that access the easement not be changed, increased or the
configuration be changed.
In response to Chairman Chiniaeffs question, Assistant City Attorney Lee noted that the CC&Rs
would be between the two parties and not the City.
Director of Planning Ubnoske stated that if any changes were to be made with regard to the site
plan, it would be brought back to the Planning Commission for review; and stated that it would
be staffs opinion that no changes to the easement after its relocation will be made.
Deputy Director of Public Works York noted that Public Works Condition of Approval No. 52
would impose that: The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope
easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
Director Ubnoske added that Planning Department Condition of Approval NO.2 would impose
that: The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval
of this project.
Chairman Chiniaeff suggested adding verbiage to Planning Department Condition of Approval
No.2, includinQ site plan access and easements.
Mr. Bridy advised that he would not be opposed to adding verbiage to Planning Department's
Condition of Approval NO.2.
For the Planning Commission, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that staff will work with the
applicant with regard to signage.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation subject that the
applicant working with staff to resolve the signage issue; and amendment to Planning
Department Condition of Approval No.4; and that verbiage be added to Public Works Condition
R:\MinutesPC\ 100307
5
of Approval 67 as it would relate to site distance for a monument sign. Commissioner Carey
seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
A. Commissioner Harter queried on the status regarding the water park.
In response to Commissioner Harter, Assistant City Attorney Lee noted that she will have City
Attorney Thorson em ail the Commission with a status report to the water park litigation.
B. Commissioner Carey queried on the schedule of the water line project from Rancho
California Road to Ynez Road.
Deputy Director of Public Works York noted that he believes the project will be completed in
beginning of 2008.
C. Chairman Chiniaeff' expressed his appreciation for staffs PowerPoint Presentations,
noting that the presentations are not only easier for the Commission to understand but the
audience as well.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director of Planning Ubnoske requested two Planning Commissioners to sit on a subcommittee
meeting with regard to a number of Ordinances that will be brought forward to the Planning
Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:21 pm, Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned to October 17, 2007 at 6:00 p.m., in the City
Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
Dennis Chiniaeff
Chairman
R:\MinutesPC\100307
6
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 17, 2007
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on
Wednesday, October 17, 2007, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Harter led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners: Carey, Harter, Telesio, Chairman Chiniaeff.
Absent:
Guerriero.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1 Plannina Application No. PA07-0272. a Finding of Public Convenience and Necessitv,
submitted bv Matthew Fagan Consultina. to authorize a Tvpe-20. Off-Sale Beer and Wine
ABC (Alcoholic Beveraae Control) license for Henrv's Markel. located on the northeast
corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road in the Rancho Temecula Town Center. 39606
Winchester Road
Associate Planner Peters by way of PowerPoint Presentation, highlighted on the following:
. Location and Project Description
. Analysis
. ABC Requirement
. Recommendation.
For Commissioner Telesio, Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that per the City's
Development Code, a grocery store would be a permitted use in the Community Commercial
(CC) Zone; and that the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) considers the
Census Tract in which the project site is located to be over concentrated in off-sale licenses;
and that therefore, a Public Convenience or Necessary finding would be required.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
R:\MinutesPC\ 101707
A. Mr. Matthew Fagan, representing Henry's Store, commended staff for their efforts and
stated that he would look forward to moving the project forward.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Carey seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
New Items
2 Planninq Application No. PA07-0176. a Development Plan, submitted bv Walt Allen
Architects, for an 11.456 square foot expansion to the existinQ T emecula StaQe Stop
complex to include the addition of a 4.257 square foot office retail buildinQ, a 3,328 square
foot second floor expansion over the existino Temecula Wine and Beer Garden. and 3.871
square feet of associated improvements. located at 28464 Old Town Front Street
With respect to recent development with the proposed project, Director of Planning Ubnoske
requested that Item NO.2 be continued to November 7, 2007.
For the Planning Commission, Principal Planner Richardson advised that there is a portion of
the proposed site Development Plan that is encroaching onto Redevelopment Agency property;
that prior to the Planning Commission taking action on the project, there would need to be
authorization from the Redevelopment Agency to propose development on Agency property that
it would be staffs intent to receive authorization prior to the November 7,2007, public hearing.
Principal Planner Richardson explained the authorization process and advised that this
continuance was requested by City Attorney Thorson.
Chairman Chiniaeff relayed his difficulty differentiating a condition on the project particularly due
to the amount of time that has been involved with the project; stated that it would be his opinion
that this project could still be approved prior to receiving authorization from the RDA, and
advised that he would not be in favor of continuing the project.
Assistant City Manager Johnson advised that the issue at hand would be whether or not the
application would be valid.
MOTION: Commissioner Harter moved to approve staff recommendation and continue Item
NO.2 to November 7, 2007. Commissioner Carey seconded the motion and voice vote
reflected approval with exception of Chairman Chiniaeff who voted No and Commissioner
Guerriero who was absent.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
A. Commissioner Harter expressed his concern with the recurrence of Ad Works sign
trucks. He also stated that it has come to his attention that some gas station businesses are
disposing oil products down city drains.
R:\MinutesPC\ 101707
2
In response to Commissioner Telesio's query regarding water fountains and shortage of water,
Deputy Director of Public Works noted that the comment he made at a previous meeting
referencing water fountains and shortage of water, was for informational purposes only.
B. Chairman Chiniaeff relayed the importance of using reclaimed water for any future water
fountains, and making this a standard Condition of Approval.
C. Commissioner Carey expressed concern with an excavator on Ynez Road during
evening hours.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No report at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:20 pm, Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned to November 7, 2007 at 6:00 p.m., in the
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Dennis Chiniaeff
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
R:\MinutesPC\ 101707
3
ITEM #2
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
DATE:
November 7,2007
SUBJECT:
Director's Hearing Case Update
Planning Director's Agenda items for October 2007.
Date Case No. Proposal Applicant Action
October 11, 2007 PA07-0174 A Minor Conditional Use Permit to Salim Purmul APPROVED
allow used auto sales to be
conducted within a multi-tenant
building within a Light Industrial
zoning district, totaling 1,080
square feet including an office,
warehouse space, and a restroom
with all vehicles being stored in
the warehouse portion of the suite,
located at 42301 Rio Nedo, Suite
102
Attachment:
1. Action Agenda - Blue Page 2
R:IDIRHEARIMEM0I2007\ 11-07 -2007 .doc
R:\DIRHEAR\MEM0I2007\11-o7 '2007.doc
ATTACHMENT NO.1
ACTION AGENDA
2
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 11, 2007
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Patrick Richardson, Principal Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the
Director of Planning on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are
limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Director of
Planning about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and
address.
Item No.1
1 :30 PM
Location:
PA07-0174
Minor CUP
California Auto Sales
Salim Purmul
A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow used auto
sales to be conducted within a multi-tenant building
within a Light Industrial zoning district, totaling
1,080 square feet including an office, warehouse
space, and a restroom with all vehicles being
stored in the warehouse portion of the suite
Generally located on the south side of Rio Nedo,
approximately 700 feet west of Diaz Road, at
42103 Rio Nedo, Suite 102
CEQA Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities
Eric Jones
APPROVED
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
Environmental Action:
Project Planner:
ACTION:
P:\Planning\Directors-Hearing\2007\10-11-2007 Action Agenda.doc
1
ITEM #3
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Planning Commission
Dana SChuma, Associate Planner
November 7,2007
SUBJECT:
Planning Application Nos. PA07-0176 (Temecula Stage Stop Expansion)
BACKGROUND
At the October 17, 2007 Planning Commission hearing staff requested the project be continued
due to proposed improvements which encroach onto Redevelopment Agency (RDA) property.
Specifically, it was determined that the RDA would have to authorize the improvements (a
sidewalk and trash enclosure pad) prior to the Planning Commission taking action on the
project.
At the hearing, staff explained that since the RDA is the property owner, the proposed off-site
improvements created a unique situation which could not be resolved by a Condition of
Approval or an encroachment permit. Staff intended to schedule the project for the City Council
(acting as the Redevelopment Agency) on November 6, 2007 to obtain approval; however,
since that time staff has determined that the RDA has to approve either an easement or a
license agreement that would allow the applicant to use a portion of the Agency's property.
Given the level of details needed for this type of agreement, it will take more than two weeks to
negotiate, complete, and obtain RDA approval for the improvements so staff was unable to
schedule the project for hearing on November 6.
Staff met with the applicant on Friday, October 19, 2007 to discuss removal of the sidewalk and
trash enclosure pad from Agency property. Since the sidewalk and the trash enclosure are not
critical for the project, the applicant and staff agreed that the project should move forward
without the improvements. Staff held a DRC meeting on October 25, 2007 to discuss the
changes and all departments approved the project revisions.
The attached revised site plan reflects the elimination of the sidewalk originally proposed along
the eastern side of the site and the elimination of the trash enclosure pad and bins proposed on
the north. The zero line set back will remain on the east property line where the steps of the
new office retail building will meet the existing parking. lot. The trash enclosure area has been
designated as a storage area until authorization for a pad to service new bins from RDA
property can be obtained. The designated storage area will eventually have to be modified to a
trash enclosure .to ensure the proposed second story restaurant has adequate on-site facilities
to dispose of refuse. Community Services staff has conditioned for this prior to Phase II
occupancy.
The site plan modifications summarized above resolve the off-site improvement issues and
allow the project to move forward. The project applicant intends to work with RDA to obtain
authorization for tbe improvements in the future.
G:\PianningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIMEMO to PC 11. 7.07.doc
1
RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, Old Town Specific Plan, and Design Guidelines. Therefore,
staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Planning Application No. PA07-0176
based upon the findings and with the attached Conditions of Approval.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Revised Plans - Blue Page 3
2. PC Resolution 07-_ - Blue Page 4
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
3. October 17, 2007, Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 5
G:IPlanningI2007IPA07-017,6 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPlanninglPCIMEMO to PC 11.7.07.doc
2
ATTACHMENT NO.1
REVISED SITE PLAN
G:\PianningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIMEMO to PC 11.7.07.doc
3
:_"_'U."j ....~~
,_..._--~ .,.........
~ _.~-
.
. -
~
~
= .=-:
._ .cc'
------~- ~
---i~~
,~
~'"
'c
!~
"~
.-------
,
0'-<1" I
---,
...~!
,
I
.~
!~L l~~~!g-~:U-i~';~ i-> ~I~~ ~!~ ! ~
IlJ;--"=~li~-m:r- ttm ~. ~,. '1
t$1 <X> ~ttr~J~~' "<;iR>i Ii 8,r}f~! l
. __ ..,=1=;;:0 , I ---,-- ,l,...,-- -010 <>!<>i:>~, :' <>9 . ~ c L'J
, ~.c ' ,,"'_,.; '7":~ w' -C~
Ii _.~"I::: L j :f~~ ~ .'. I, w. ~>-:~~I~ i
, ~.=.t:< 0 ~'.. - :y', ;/." .,",,1, '" ~!~ ::~!; ~ "~/'-ml"~'
n.... f,9)1 U, I...n." 81 'v (:!\)d . ~ // l"1
~...-.....n p!..~.'.I.~..~",. \/:. :>~:..'.'~.c " ~.~.,'dir~iii5'1'!.-.\#..m.' .,~. 1. I;.
,=~.-----_.~ --'" ".-- I ..,<. I!'!~H'"
.~,",~,='.-.-:..-.'.'I!!.~U.l ~.'~.J~i...~h. .'.!l!:.:::..'~.:; .:'.li'..-: (,'++.I,.'--dL----
1'I.i~1i .'l),,-:..- ~,_'\1~i~,,',""'.llj:\6...'j~.... .. .... .~~.r J~!.I 'l
,==:_ . !~~.~,", '" _-",.,~ -- Ii.
, .. ;;:=-=, !, _~.., il\!!:~o""~=-===-==c= Iii l~
'g. =._ . "". ~ 1~1' ,'C"~' !~I; ~~
~. ~'".,.,.".,,~ 11 .- ~4:~..~~' ~ ~~. I !iil Ii
!~ :-g~IJ:lI' ~ ~ ---:t'+'-:I;-: ~ ~ ~:- 'I Ii!
.. ".===."..'= /1.;1. '.'." ,;., ,c'i!ii,"". '''' '_ 1\t'". . .'_.' III -. lV.I l
~..__.,.,.., ,~""'2i" -.,
:;==.:=:,_. .I!t .::: ~ . ~,~i:~~ lk- a-i":': '1=" --- If. s.~ d:.
:-__= 1.",,_ . ~,,"~-~ I ~~ .. ': --- 'ji1<I III'
-........-. -'-">;' . r)<'~~ - '<~~!
:; ~.--;:-=~.:;': cki(~I:" rt! ~lE -=====-=~~~-~ ~~ i'l I i
~-.., >2\.~' /, 0":( '-..-- I'
~f~ ;-. " t5 ><1'~~ '~w2~G~c:fJ!S\' , Ii''';:' '-,11___ ==______11
~~, /t',{';l."'!'." , ,I ~'
.~ =---.~.. -,.i~ !:", 8:1i' -'XI ~'''~'. ',' .-:..j::-,-'~~--~------1
, II -~:"7~ ~ "( ,?f'J:, t:~~~ * R1y ,-' ~...q- t+-".l-.I-- ' l
. !'~i" :>!fJ.'tl~f. m! ! I,' .\ i
, . ..\. !v~.~ '.:.. .~_:i:~::. '\--"\1'1f,I 1"---.1' /' W.;.
",,/. ~ '-. ' / / >: - t;E !,.:. \ '<i~_ . "".,1
.,_' ~ '>, _,/ c,.'.'.'.'
.." ......... ", I ~! l'IY
/ v ~ . !!',~.'.' : ; ! I I"g:>"
'If'''~'''' ' ,,: / I I ., i',~
~ "\.,A"~ ~.,iii..~!i~.i;:!. ;~:::i:l ';" "I!!iilil-~/ 1 I ,,~~
! ~ '- "," 'Iilm ,:11 "'" I' 'Ii ''''''''111 j I
" !!ii!. ' 'Iilill!'; I! ;ii..~ i ..l
"JX1f J
~ ...... ~ 1'lC) ~]l "
:~ ....._ __'1 "... ....,. .,.... ~;u" 0
............. '............ m:-i:i s"; . ~a
K " ~~(IJ ,..t f ij;
~ SIXTJ!~ ,J Iii l ! ~ 81 i;J ~ 'l
@-'" I); ~ l;~ ~-1:" ~
-- ~ 'l .I, -"!/ ,
1 8 I..' ' I 1.:1 . I ~; , i i i
~~ '" !l i~ \ I _n "..... ll" -.5 "/ -,j ;
" E2 ". ~ i'" i- ~r",,-'-.F-
~ ' .. 1000,lijiil l" ..... I '
> ..,O"~ Ii" ::l' ... -
.?"tn+d~ {- II lI!~~-';;:T m
n ! ~ " k Ii: ! ~r~ I
,(,.J.- I ~!!~~
l::~~... '1171 .. ! \1 iI-
~o. ~;~: i! i
j ~'= ill! ! '
~~~ ..<> r
~~ ~
-- -- "
..'... ---. ," '.
Il~ ~!,~~i~
.... '.1 Id-
- ~~ ;.
I
I
,
I,
i'
I
,
- -----~----+
/1
( \
( J
\(,
I.
I'
k
'<', \
"U
.,
I
......
,- .
i i_:
I'
-
--
-~
-~
-
_OIdT-.F\'<Ifll_
T........CAIlz:iIIO
Ime
~ II,
"i
Wa~er R. Allen, AlA
Stage Stop Expansion
_OIdT-.F\'<Ifll......lUloZll
T.........CA_
.....~
....-
;;:~ .~~---.
",~'.,
- -- ------------------n----~-----
i~
~'"
n
Ii
- .....--.-..!'".:!!!.-- -----2!-<:------t
;
---~.,~;:;-t
"""""'"' !
.
~
~ '11,.i -
. "
b
l
, pr,~-l
'I ~~d I
. ,
I-i.'
/~
@
l
>
,
1~~~I=- . ,! ,'"1 7i~'~ ~ '
'i ~Li~: 0 ,', .~..--mml-/:~~i"L:~~ i ) ::-~\ '.;, ;~~t~.-.J
___ -- I 1 ar~r\--~E' ot, t' ,4 Y ~ ~"~g
= "I'. -~~ "i0 ' " "'''''' l"'l" - !
=_= I ,'. ~~~ ~~ \-' r' '.r=7~ t. -~~' '/7A# 1'1
='== L 'i. ~~ ~~~ - 1t:'':' :-i;i0 ''''.?l i .,pt' ~. C ii: '!
~-==~.,;'--_~ "~~'~ .--f.' I -=-~. r,~'~i_
~'lli.: ._~0i0 ,-;, ;I:-::~ :.(~, 11--'-----
II iifllla.-{:~~~~ ~1:ij> Nl1i I ! \((1\
_. I g ~, ~~ ~ IV .~" I -.- __________ r= ~g
l ---- ,~ ! \. I." -- ., ....;: 0 I I !~
'" 'u_." rz. ~'" K :" ~" :.
-- ~" ' "~,,'" ~1 ,llg. - I "1 I" /
if ~ ".: -'~ . -11}i~F ~ := 1[' I,) -)1 I'
II ~~I~.V;~..~ -~~~~~I i I~ ~'~ i~ill ~ I
!2 ~ if :. ~11.~~ c"H'- r(:::=';: = '1,11 ~
ii1 . " ,., L ; ,~~~ "'~ L(I '1 ~: ';:':, .::' '~I~ ' ;
~ ----.' ffii&,,, rli~~ ./1,
. , ~::=-~i: ~.: v Cx~' T,^~.~'~l, " r;;; I~ I~ I:: ~: I l
-- x '?S ' >----- ...~ '
l ~k:, < :1 >.}'~ ~<:-- ":"'1' ~h>':~ f~.-:" Ifj---- ==-----'1
'I 1/ ^"'~" k " ' " ~", ~ j ~,
.' . T' ^' ',l>, .~. ,c::'"'>: ','" ,. ',' '~~~. .' ",.--e;..--j;,-"
il ' . /""7 ~ _ ,. " . ",. '\: ". . ,= .'.'A" I'--:J.l !Il
. II C ~J ~ "., r! ~" ..~ ~~_ J. >-. Illi . ~h~~ . ,7'"(! ,1-11 --jl ,
l ,!I./' /'~ ~~~,/ / x....., . ;,:'j\ --\~''''-;fIGf!)i I m~
1t" '\ ~~~ ,,: ~_\ ~ ,f--r I .~~~
/ \ '\0' \-. "r.~~~~:~:'" , V' j! i I I' . ~~~
!r ~~" i.:TIfDIrn::i.lllllllllii_~~/: i [ .,' '.~
~" *!l .JIr~ d ;"
""""""" ........ ...... ....... ....... ...... ~!ij "'\ ~
=- ' ~ 8~~ ~a :;;
SIrlllSTREl"J' ~ ~'l1~ g~ ~ ~:. ~ ~~
_~~T ~..~ ~~" U~ ~~~ h' !l
,J !!, l !); ,> )' :i" b~t ~ b
- -;;! ,j d, ~ j' It. . ~)!" i
~ ' ,..3 I,;; I
n i\,~'l~ ~ ~ po ~ ~/-
.~ .. II . ~ r"..! / j ;
t ~ ij~ ; ~ ~ -I" ~g - ~ ~'" ~ ~ ~
~ ~~I! hi !< - zg I ~~ ~ hF-1~EXIST--l.>
? "l~___I-;:-;:: ;;I: "" ~i~ - !!~SlOE""'" ~
o "- I 1 <glj;r::..-lJl m
w ~.4 ..
, ''1. I' ! " ,,"
!r '1..~ ' i I !~~~ !
llP1~ 0:" i .i; ~ i i'; -
'F= iila i >
S ....!'2 ~""S ~
~6~ ~~ ~
1J
...,
I
......
'lliid .
I ~I"'IE
II
-
--
--
--
-
_adT___
T....m.C-'~
IlliG
I~
1"1
Watter R. Allen, AlA
Stage Stop Expansion
_a.iT-.Rui....._JOI
r-.c.o._
~...~
....-
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION 07-_
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIMEMO to PC 11.7.07.doc
4
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA07-0176, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR AN 11,456 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO THE
EXISTING TEMECULA STAGE STOP COMPLEX TO
INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF A 4,257 SQUARE FOOT
OFFICE RETAIL BUILDING, A 3,328 SQUARE FOOT
SECOND FLOOR RESTAURANT, AND 3,871 SQUARE
FEET OF ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS ON A 0.37
ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 28464 OLD TOWN FRONT
STREET (APN 922-023-022)
Section 1. Procedural Findinqs. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On June 11, 2007, Walt Allen Architects filed Planning Application No.
PA07-0176, (Development Plan), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula
General Plan and Development Code.
B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on October 17, 2007, and on November 7,2007,
at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition
to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07-0176
subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Development Plan (Development Code Section 17.05.010.F)
,--.".,
A. The proposed use is in confomlance with the General Plan for Te-mecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City; .
The project is consistent with' the General Plan and the Development Code
because the project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the
applicable policies and standards for commercial office development. The
proposed office retail building and expansion of the commercial use is permitted
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\PC Resolution.doc
1
in the land use designation standards contained in the General Plan and Old
Town Specific Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned,
is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as
condition'ed, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare;
The overall design of the project, including site design, building height, setbacks,
parking, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended
to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The
project is consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards, and
regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed, and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental FindinQs. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Development Plan application:
A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed
project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review
(Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects);
1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and
all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning
designation and regulations;
The proposed land use for the site is allowed by the General Plan and
zoning designation of the Development Code and Old Town Specific Plan.
The project is consistent with all development standards, including
setbacks, height, an.d FAR requirements for the site.
2. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site that
is less than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses;
The project is proposed on a 0.37 acre site surrounded by existing
development within an established commercial area. "'.
3. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or
threatened species;
The property is not known to have any value as habitat for endangered,
rare or threatened species as it has been previously disturbed and fully
developed. Additionally, the project site is not recommended for habitat
conservation nor does it support or impact any habitat associated with the
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Program (MSHCP).
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\PC Resolution.doc
2
4. The project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air
quality, or water quality;
Commercial development was anticipated for the project site and the land
use was analyzed as part of the General Plan and Old Town Specific
Plan. The project has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the
impacts analyzed as part of the General Plan EIR.
5. The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services;
The utility and public service companies were notified of the proposed
project and no new facilities or expansion of existing facilities will be
necessary as a result of the project. Existing services are available and
adequate to service the proposed development.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application No. PA07-0176, a Development Plan for an 11,456
square foot expansion located at 28464 Old Town Front Street, subject to the
Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-Q176 Stage'Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\PC Resolution.doc
3
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 7th day of November 2007.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 07- was duly and regularly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th
day of November 2007, by the following vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:.
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\PC Resolution.doc
4
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SCANNED:
G DRIVE:
PERMITS PLUS:
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Slage Stop Expansion Major MOD\PianningIPC\Draft COA.doc
1
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I,
(print name) understand that Planning Application No. PA
has been approved with Conditions of Approval which are set forth in
Exhibit A. I have read the Conditions of Approval contained in PC Resolution No.
and understand them. Through signing this ACCEPTANCE OF
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, I agree and commit to the City of Temecula that I will
implement and abide by the Conditions of Approval, including any indemnification
requirements imposed by those conditions.
SIGNA TURE
DATE
G:IPianningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
2
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA07-0176
Project Description:
Assessor's Parcel No.
MSHCP Category:.
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
A Development Plan to expand the existing Temecula
Stage Stop complex with the addition of a 4,257 square
foot office retail building over the existing bus bays, a
3,328 square foot second floor expansion over the
existing Temecula Wine and Beer Garden, and
associated improvements totaling 3,871 square feet on a
0.37 acre site located at 28464 Old Town Front Street
922-023-022
Commercial
Retail Commercial/Office
Retail Commercial
November 7,2007
November 7, 2009
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00)
for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as
provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations
Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to
the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted
shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document
that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an
original signature to the Planning Department.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-Q176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\Oraft COA.doc
3
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPlanning\PC\Draft COA.doc
4
Planning Department
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this project.
5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of
time, one year at a time.
7. A Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop complex shall be required subject to review
and approval by the Planning Commission.
8. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and
elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
11. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
12. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These
shall be clearly labeled on site plan. .
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOo\PlanninglPCIOraft COA.doc
5
13. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed
satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment,
finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required
by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which
case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal,
the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Wine & Beer Garden Building
Material
Exterior Wood Plank Vertical Siding
Exterior Wood Plank Trim/Trellis/Railing
Bent Seam Metal Roof
Metal Clad Wood Windows
Multi-lite Wood Doors
Trash Enclosure Stucco Finish
Office Retail Building
Material
Exterior Cemetitious Fiber Board Siding
Exterior Wood Trim
Certainteed Asphalt Shingle Roof
Metal Clad Wood Windows
Multi-lite Wood Doors
Metal Seam Window Accent
Color
Olympic Stain - Carmel
Olympic Stain - 707 Tobacco
Oldtown Gray
Bronze Clad
Stain to match existing Stage Stop
To match existing Stage Stop stucco
Color
Roycroft Copper Red SW 2839
Roycroft Vellum SW 2833
Sunrise Cedar
Linen Clad
Stain to match existing Stage Stop
Weathered Bronze
14. The painted mural located on the north side ofthe property shall be replaced if construction
results in damage andlor removal.
15. The development of premises andlor expansion of uses on the property shall be subject to
the requirements of Chapter 8.36, Smoking in Public Places, of the Temecula Municipal
Code.
Public Works Department
16. A Grading Permit for either rough andlor precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
17. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
18. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
G:\PlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOO\Planning\PClOraft COA.doc
6
19. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent
post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent
non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering any storm drain system or receiving
water.
20. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be accepted by the City prior to the initial
grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and include
site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment
mechanisms.
Building and Safety Department
21. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code; 2001
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.1
22. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collectfees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance
on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of
building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01
and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
23. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
24. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
25. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
26. Show all building setbacks.
27. Buildings shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of
exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site.
28. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
29. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998).
30. . Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
31. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
32. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
7
33. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No 94-
21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No 457.73, for any site within
one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays
34. Prior to submitting for plan review, obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. Site
plan to indicate all suite numbering in direct correlation with addressing and proposed
buildings.
35. At time of plan submittal, restroom fixtures, number and type, shall be in accordance with
the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California building Code Appendix 29.
36. At time of plan submittal, provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel
schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan
review.
37. At time of plan submittal, truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and
the truss manufacturer engineer are required.
38. At time of plan submittal, provide precise grading plan to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
Fire Prevention Bureau
39. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
40. Existing fire hydrants meet the requirements for the spacing in Old Town for this project.
41. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2).
Community Services Department
42. Developer will protect in place landscaping along Front Street. Any damage will be
repaired, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services, at the cost of the
developer.
43. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers. The standard ramped pads shall be located in front of the
trash enclosure gates to provide access for servicing.
44. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPlanning\PC\Draft CQA.doc
8
45. All landscaping (with the exception of the current TCSD landscape areas along Front and
Sixth Streets), fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the maintenance
association or property owner.
Police Department
46. All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their booklet on
the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association 1127-11 th Street, Suite
1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal Code 490.5 affords merchants the
opportunity to recover their losses through a civil demand program.
47. Any business that serves or sells any type of alcoholic beverage will comply with all
guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated
with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the Temecula Police
Department for inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes
special events held at business location where alcohol will be serviced for a fee and the
event is open to the general public. Furthermore, the business will maintain a current up-
to-date alcohol business license issued by the Riverside District Office of Alcohol Beverage
Control.
48. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the building should be removed or painted over within
twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Report all crimes to the Temecula Police 24-
hour dispatch center at (951) 696-HELP.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-G176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\Draft COA.doc
9
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:\PlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
10
Planning Department
49. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical
plans for verification of proper placement oftransformer(s) and double detector check prior
to final agreement with the utility companies.
50. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project
site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by
the Director of Planning.
51. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavationlconstruction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at hislher sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult andlor authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
Public Works Department
52. A Grading Plan shall be prepared bya registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works.. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
53. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
54. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
55. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
56. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
G:\PlanningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOO\PlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
11
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream
facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
57. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading,
Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's
standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
58. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number
(WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of
construction activities.
59. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
60. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
61. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
62. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
63. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
64. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as F.lood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Fire Prevention Bureau
65. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved Fire Department vehicle access roads. Fire Department access roads shall be an
all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
G:IPianningI2007\PA07-Q176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
12
66. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1).
67. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14).
68. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4).
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
13
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
14
Planning Department
69. A Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop complex shall be approved.
70. All downspouts provided on the exterior of the building shall be of the same quality and
architectural style as the building subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning.
A material sample shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit.
71. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department for Phase 1. These plans shall conform to the
approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location
number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall
be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: one
inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for
final planting inspection."
c. A note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an
agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection."
d. One copy of the approved grading plan.
e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
f. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
g. The locations of all existing trees that will remain.
h. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
i. Specifications shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be
required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being
pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure.
The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head
coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the
approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/owner shall contact the
Planning Department to schedule inspections.
72. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three foot clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen.
Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like
an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on
plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
G:\PlanningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanning\PC\Draft COAdoc
15
73. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas, including but not limited to
trellises, decorative furniture, and hardscape, to match the style of the building subject to
the approval of the Planning Director.
74. A detail of the trash enclosure door shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
review and approval.
75. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
76. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals
shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied
over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as
closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
Public Works Department
77. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over AC,
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard No. 400.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
78. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and
other traffic control devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Sewer and domestic water systems.
d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
79. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public WClrks for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
80. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
G:IPianningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPlanninglPClDraft COA.doc
16
81. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
82. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Building and Safety Department
83. Prior to beginning building construction for each phase of the project, a pre-construction
meeting is required with the building inspector.
Fire Prevention Bureau
84. The developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention
Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire
service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention
Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and
minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground
submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on site hydrants. The plans
must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC 8704.3,
901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1).
85. All locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle
access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall
of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed
for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet (CFC sec 902).
86. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three
sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention
Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit.
87. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets
of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel.
88. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the
wildland-vegetation interface (CFC Appendix II-A).
89. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures
shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or
block walls), and fuel modification zones (CFC Appendix II-A).
Community Services Department
90. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
G:IPianningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPC\Draft COA.doc
17
Police Department
91. A parking stall for one bus is required. The parking space should be approximately 33 feet
long x 16 feet wide. The stall should not block two-way circular vehicle traffic within the
City's parking complex off Sixth Street. Ifthis is notfeasible, adequate bus parking (pick up
and drop off point) shall be provided within walking distance ofthe Stage Stop Ticket office.
Anyon-street bus stop must be approved by the City. The parking stall shall be properly
marked with verbiage "BUS PARKING ONLY" stenciled with 12" lettering and proper
stripping within the stall.
. G:\PI~nningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanning\PC\Draft COA.doc
1B
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY
THIS PERMIT
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOO\Planning\PC\Oraft COA.doc
19
Planning Department
92. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical
equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final
inspection it fs determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of
building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the
project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered
mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning.
93. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
94. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantin9s in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one
year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the
bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
95. All site improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
96. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
Public Works Department
97. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP
have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for
immediate implementation.
98. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
99. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
100. All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per
the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
101. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\Draft COA.doc
20
Fire Prevention Bureau
102. "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3).
103. Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such
a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property.
Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family
residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with
suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six
(6) inch high letters andlor numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC 901.4.4).
104. Based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall
install a fire sprinkler system (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9).
105. Based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the
developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters
Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation (CFC Article 10).
106. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet
in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC 902.4).
107. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC 902.4).
108. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
109. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format
must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be
acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval.
Community Services Department
110. Prior to the issuance of occupancy of phase two, the developer shall complete the addition
to the trash enclosure area for a total of 4 bins to be provided. The improvements shall
include ramps.
Police Department
.111. Upon completion of construction, the building shall have a monitored alarm system installed
and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to notify the
Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices, suites, businesses
located within a specific building should have their own alarm system. This condition is void
if business is opened 24/7.
G:IPlanningI2007IPA07-o176 Stage Stop. Expansion Major MODIPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
21
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
".~.
G:\PianningI2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
22
112. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control
District's transmittal dated July 16, 2007, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or
money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the
District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
113. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated July 3, 2007, a copy of which is
attached.
:\
,
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPianning\PC\Draft COA.doc
23
W Ak.., D. WILLIAMS
General Manager~Chief Engineer
,--,
1995 MARKET STREET
, RIVERSIDE, CA 9250 I
,," 951.955.1200
"'?, 951.788.9965FAX
wwwm6odcontrol.co.riverside.ca.us
T{""!7 _..
. "-"-,-
. ':-' (-.<,
"..' 'j' ,"", 1\ "
7J. :~':~"'1 ."'
'-""'\ "-
.\ .,
':1 I
114772 J
~6E~~~:Rcg~s~i~~~~~~~~WJfY~f",;):i'-'
July 16,2007
City ofTemecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Dana Schuma
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
PA07-0176
The District does not nonnally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in
incorporated Cities. The District also does not plan ,check City land use cases, or provide State Division of
Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such
cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plail
facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which wlild he considered a logical component or
extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In
addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed tl:1eproposed projeci in detail and the following comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsem~nt of the proposed project with respect to, flood hazard,
publiG health and safety, or any other such issue: '.
The entirc boundary of the property is within the 100 year Zone AF. tloodplain limits t'Or Murrieta Creek as
delineated on Panel No. 060742-0010B dated September 2,1993 of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in
conjrIDction withthe National Flood Insurance Program, administered hy the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA). A District flood study in 1987 determined the base l1.ood elevation for the maMer plan flow
rate of 38,300 cts to be ! 007.84 (NGVD 29) at the location. '
The (~$. A!'!)'!v C0ms of "f';qt.lineers f1Jo!'h~ \vith the District and the Cities. of Teinecula' and MUITieta are
. ~ . ~. - -
working on the design of the Murrieta Creek Flood Control; Environmental Restoration and Recreation project
(Project), which has been Congressionally authorized. The proposed development is located within Phase 2 of
the ProJect, which is scheduled to begin construction in the near future pending Federally allocated fnnding.
Questions regarding the Project may be addressed to Zully Smith of our otlice at 95 1.955.1299.
Until the proposed Project has been constructed, all new buildings should be floodproofe<l by elevating the
finished floor a minimum of 12 inches above the District's floodplain eievation of 1007.H4.
This projt'd is located within Ihe limits of the District's Murrieta Crce\:/Tcmecllla Valley Area, Drainage Plan
for which drainage fee3 have been adopted: applicable fees should he J!aid prior to the issuance of grading
pemlits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of iSsll'illce of the actual pennit.
114772_3
Mrs. Dana Schuma
City of Temecula
Re: PA07-0176
-2-
July 16, 2007
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) penn it from the State
Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation or other final approval should not be
given until the City has detennined that the project has been granted a pennit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a FEMA mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all
studies, calculations, plans and other infonnation required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further
require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation
or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
The applicant shall show written proof of compliance with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(MSHCP) for any drainage facilities the applicant proposes to be maintained by the District. All applicable
CEQA and MSHCP documents and pennits shall address the construction, operation and maintenance of all
onsite and off site drainage facilities. Draft CEQA documents shall be forwarded to the District during the
public review period.
If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant
to obtain all applicable Federal, State and local regulatory pennits. These regulatory pennits include, but are
not limited to: a Section 404 Pennit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in compliance with section
404 of the Clean Water Act, a California State Department ofFish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement
in compliance with the Fish and Game Code Section 1600 et seq., and a 401 Water Quality Certification or a
Report of Waste Discharge Requirements in compliance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act or State
Porter Cologne Water Quality Act, respectively, from the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The applicant shall also be responsible for complying with all mitigation measures as required under CEQA
and all Federal, State, and local environmental rules and regulations.
Very truly yours,
~L/I, tJ~
MARK H. WILLS
Senior Civil Engineer
c: Ron Parks, City ofTemecula
Zully Smith, RCFC & WCD
AM:blj
RIVCO'lAND USE
fax:951-955-B903
Jul 3200L.15:19
P.02
~~ 0 ;(;vUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY 0
e&~ DEP~TMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
, .
!
July 3, 2007
City ofTemecula Plallllinli Department.
P.O, Box 9033 i
Temecula, CA 92589-903B
Attention: Dana Sohuma i
RE: Development Plan Nol, PA067-0176
I
!
Dear M!, Schuma;
Department of Enviro~ta1 HeaJth has reviewed the development plan to fur a major modification to
the existing Stage Stop C!mPI~X for th~ addition of a 5,246 square foot, two-story offIce buildins on
the existing bus bays, a ,328 square foot second floor expansion over the existing Wine & Beer
Garden. The site plan do s indicate if water and sewer services exist, we assume that these services
are in and are available. b
I. PRIOR TO HE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING
SHOULD BE QUIRED:
a) "Will-serve" 1etters from the appropriate water district.
b) If there are to be any food ~stabJislunents, (including vending machin~s), three complete
sets ofpl~ fur eaCh food establislunent will be submitted including a fixture schedule,
a finish sc~ule and a plwnbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California lf~form Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food
Facility PI, Examiners at (951) 461.0284. .
I
!
~'~^~d
~e~jEHs
(951) 955.8980 ~
NOTE: AIty ourrcnt Iddbnal requltemmu n01 covered can be lIppllCllblc at time or Buildina" Plan rovkw tor tinal DQpU1menl of
. 1!olYin>a11lOllUl u.ldlh cl"""""".
!
Lou I Enlo'''''''tnt AD.ncV . P.O. Box 12BO, lii,mid., CA 92&02,1260 . 1909)955.6962 . FAX (909) 781.9653 . 4080 Lemon Slr..l, 91h Floor, Rlvelllde, CA 92501'
Lind U.. and Weter E"GlAterins' P.O. Box 12~6, Rlv.rlide, CA 92502.1206. 1909)95&,8980' FAX (9091955,8903 . ~080 Lemon Slrt.I,.2nd Floor. RlJtllide. CA 92S01
i .
ATTACHMENT NO.3
OCTOBER 17, 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
G:IPianningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOOIPlanninglPCIMEMO to PC 11.7.07.doc
5
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
ORIGINAL
DATE OF MEETING:
October 17, 2007
PREPARED BY:
Dana Schuma
TITLE:
Associate Planner
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
Planning Application No. PA07-0176, a Development Plan for
an 11,456 square foot expansion to the existing Temecula
Stage Stop complex to include the addition of a 4,257 square
foot office retail building over the existing bus bays, a 3,328
square foot second floor expansion over the existing Temecula
Wine and Beer Garden, and 3,871 square feet of associated
improvements on a 0.37 acre site located at 28464 Old Town
Front Street
RECOMMENDATION:
[8] Approve with Conditions
. 0 Deny
o Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
CEQA:
[8] Categorically Exempt
(Section)
(Class)
15332
32 In-Fill Development
o Notice of Determination (Section)
o Negative Declaration
o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
G:\PlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\PlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
1
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: Chris Campbell representing Walt Allen Architects, Inc.
Date of Completion: June 11, 2006
Mandatory Action Deadline Date: October 17, 2007
General Plan Designation: Community Commercial
Zoning Designation: Old Town Specific Plan
SitelSurrounding Land Use: Tourist Retail Core (TRC)
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Existing Retail Buildings (TRC)
Existing Retail Buildings (TRC)
Parking Lot (TRC)
Chaparral Building (TRC)
Lot Area:
0.37 acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio:
85 percent
Landscape Area/Coverage:
9 percent
Parking Required/Provided:
N/A
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
On November 15, 2006, Walt Allen Architects submitted a Pre-Application (PR06-0022) on
behalf of the property owner Ed 0001 for the expansion of the existing Temecula Stage Stop.
Planning staff met with the applicants and owner on several occasions to discuss the proposed
building design. After several redesigns, the applicant formally submitted a Development Plan
(PA07 -0176) for the expansion on June 11, 2007. A DRC meeting for the project was held on
July 12, 2007 to discuss minor site plan, architecture, and landscaping comments. Staff also
requested the applicant concurrently process a Sign Program application for the complex. The
applicant submitted revised plans on July 30, 2007 and a comprehensive Sign Program
(PA07-0265) on September 17, 2007. Since the Sign Program was filed in late September, it
will be brought before the Commission for review and approval separately.
On October 8, 2007, the project was heard at the Old Town Local Review Board meeting.
Staff presented the project and the Board responded with several questions regarding the
transit center and bus bays, the mural along the north side of the property, and the building
phasing. The Board provided comments of support and recommended approval of the project
with a vote of 4-0. Staff added a condition of approval requiring the mural to be replaced if it is
removed andlor damaged during construction (Condition of Approval No. 14). Staff has
worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant
concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
G:IPlanningI2007IPA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
2
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The site fronts on to Old Town Front Street at the northeast corner of Sixth Street. Currently,
there are two existing buildings on site: Sweet Lumpy's and the Temecula Wine and Beer
Garden. The proposed project will not result in alterations to the existing Sweet Lumpy's
building along Old Town Front Street. The Sweet Lumpy's building meets the minimum
requirements of the development standards and will remain in its current condition.
The proposed project conforms to the development standards of the Tourist Retail Core (TRC)
zoning district in the Old Town Specific Plan. The building setbacks for the proposed 4,257
square foot office retail building located on the eastern side of the site meets the minimum
requirements of the Specific Plan. A continuous porch and covered walkway have been
provided on the east elevation for both the office building and the restaurant expansion which
allows the front yard setback to be reduced to zero.
The expansion to the existing Wine & Beer Garden includes a 3,328 square foot second floor
restaurant and outdoor dining deck as well as a 115 square foot administrative office.
Additionally, the project includes a number of first floor improvements including a new trash
enclosure, storage area, and a fire pit.
The commercial complex with the proposed expansion will be a total of 13,573 square feet.
The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the site will be 85 percent, which is below the 100 percent
maximum lot coverage permitted in the TRC zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan.
The project fronts onto Old Town Front Street with an existing public parking lot located to the
east of the project. The Specific Plan does not require that parking be provided for commercial
and/or office land uses; therefore, no parking is proposed.
Architecture
The proposed project design is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan design guidelines
and the existirig western theme. The project will expand on the existing Stage Stop concept
and western architectural style. Common design elements of the western frontier style which
are incorporated into the project include board and batten. wood, a false front "western"
parapet, wooden balustrades, exterior wooden stairways, multi-lite double doors, a covered
porch with decorative wood braced columns, and shingle and metal seam roofing materials.
To expand on the existing Stage Stop concept, each component of the project is themed after
one of four historically based elements of a train depot: a ticket sales office and waiting room,
a luggage warehouse, a commercial building and boarding house, and a barnlutility room. The
existing Sweet Lumpy's building is representative of a historical ticket sales office and waiting
room. Situated along Old Town Front Street, the one-story building is a highly visible portion of
the complex and a key element of the overall train depot theme.
The expansion of the existing Temecula Wine and Beer Garden building is intended to
represent a historical luggage warehouse on the first floor and a barn/utility room on the
second. The barn like architecture includes a two-story building mass with vertical wood siding
and ten foot high ceilings. Decorative multi-lite doors, wood trims, and wood shutters will dress
G:\PlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanning\PC\PC STAFF REPORT.doc
3 .
all sides of the building. The western elevation, which faces Old Town Front Street, will
provide an outdoor dining deck complete with a decorative wood railing, a detailed wood plank
truss, and extensive overhangs from a metal seam roof. The eastern porch elevation will also
include a small office building complete with faux windows, wood shutters, and metal seam
roof.
The proposed office retail building is intended to represent a historical commercial building and
boarding house. The architecture includes a two-story building mass with a rectangular fagade
and horizontal wood siding. The building front includes a false roof parapet with a heavy
architectural cornice. The architectural detailing includes narrow wood porches with wood
braced columns, multi-lite double doors, long and a covered entryway.
All elevations will receive stylistic architectural treatment as required by the Old Town Specific
Plan design guidelines. The applicant has selected only colors from the Sherwin-Williams
Preservation Exterior Palette, which are representative of the late 1800's. The project
incorporates a mix of exterior treatments that capture the grace and elegance of another era.
The Temecula Wine and Beer Garden wood siding will be stained in two complementary
colors, while the new office building will be painted copper red with accenting wood trim.
LandscapinQ
The project proposes to improve and 'add to the existing landscaping on site. Landscaping
improvements include benches for the public to sit, relax, and enjoy the interior of the complex.
Four Crepe Myrtles are proposed to be planted to soften and shade the site at various points.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on October 6, 2007 and mailed to
the property owners within the required 600-foot radius.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been
deemed io be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class
32, In-Fill Development Projects).
1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all
applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designations and
regulations. The proposed land use for the site is allowed by the General Plan and
zoning designation of the Development Code and Old Town Specific Plan. The project
is consistent with all development standards, including setbacks, height, and FAR
requirements for the site.
2. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site that is less than
five acres and is substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is proposed on a
0.37 acre site surrounded by existing development within an established commercial
area.
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPianninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
4
3. The project site is not known to have value as habitat for endangered, rare or
threatened species. The property is not known to have any value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species as it has been previously disturbed and fully
developed. Additionally, the project site is not recommended for habitat conservation
nor does it support or impact any habitat associated with the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Program (MSHCP).
4. The project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or
water quality. Commercial development was anticipated for the project site and the
land use was analyzed as part of the General Plan and Old Town Specific Plan. The
project has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed as part
of the General Plan EIR.
5. The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The.utilityand
public service companies were notified of the proposed project and no new facilities or
expansion of existing facilities will be necessary as a result of the project. Existing
services are available and adequate to service the proposed development.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, Old Town Specific Plan, and Design Guidelines. Therefore,
staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Planning Application No. PA07-0176
based upon the findings and with the attached Conditions of Approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Development Code Section 17.05.010.F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City.
The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code because
the project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the applicable
policies and standards for commercial office development. The proposed office retail
building and expansion of the commercial use is permitted in the land use designation
standards contained in the General Plan and Old Town Specific Plan. The site is
properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other
applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and
building codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The overall design of the project, including site design, building height, setbacks,
parking, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to
protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project is
G:IPJanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOOlPianninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
5
consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended
to ensure that the development will be constructed, and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety, and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 7
2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 8
3. PC Resolution 07-_ - Blue Page 9
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
4. Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 10
G:IPlanning12007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPianninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
6 .
ATTACHMENT NO.1
VICINITY MAP
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
7
/
/
,---\
'/
"
,'"'
'.
,"
" CJ~
,// ,.l
... Q-i'"
<o'fi //
_/
,
,
,
./
/
/
,'/''--
\
;'
;'
\,
\
\
\
'.
,
'\ ,,/
\ ,-_./
~/
/
, "
'.
'.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
"
,
,
'.
\.
// Q
",,0~ , ,/
// 0# ..-
,y:. <'
/
///\,
\
\
,
\
'.
\
./'
\. '
// ~---- }
\ ///' -----~~I .'
"',,'/ .' .
,,/ /
,(--- /
------" -.. /
/
I
,
I
/
..-
l/
\
\
7
, i
! r-,
ii',
/ /,\',
-~ ! I""
7f# / '\ "-
l 2 ('/
I I.ij 1"-
/ f5 I "-
j ~ I
( , I
! '.
!
,
i
!
\
\
'.
'.
\_/
')<
"
\
/
"
\
\
'.
\ \
\ \
\ \
v
\
\
\
'.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PLAN REDUCTIONS
G:IPlanning12007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOOIPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
8
/
I
i
i
I
I
!
i
!
I
,
\
I
I
!
I
J
I
i
I
I
I
\
\
,
\
J
\
I
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
\
,
'.
'\
/
i
I
I
i
I
(
0,
l
Ii
-
~
I
lllli.~~;
11M) ~ ;~i~ ~
..
. '..11' ... ~ ..... .."'-'z.... .
-
-
-
--
o
I
II'
I.
,
W
~~i!:
mi2t
~
~~~~~~~~~~
~,
-,
.
.1
il
,
,
I
I
,
~i
f
~:
!'.~
Ii. ..
-~
-II
'l:
1--
--
illru!l
ii1p-:j
~l
~
--....
--
~~
2 9~
!!li
-.a~~
:) ~ 0:.,
~ <
I '
t
~I (
- I'
;~i
~
(%>
"
'i;
'-
l..'l:lIlUIU.m
IlIlr
I
1
t
I'!
,'.
" !
!l
t. ~ x
.;: -- ..., zl!!
.. !I <>ij gz:
~ I II ~
~i:!
~tJl
"'J ._
'1'1 ..-
~II h.
--
~
-
~
~lil'l
~Jilll'.
-....
-.....
-~-
__""__.LPIO_
UO!SU-edX3 dOlS ~5-elS
'1''1 "U&HV '1:1 J91fllM
_D_
-~-.!....,...
11'1 C\I
~I' L
.-r:1_ a.
.
I
~l
! I
u
~
i
@
,
~
~-
~
I
--,
l
I
il~
I
[SJ[SJ QSJlf---,--~".J
il J
bl;J t'--l--j I
~
f-----.,
! fYl !
-------l
.,
i
f
I
I
"..
II~
~ "'"
o@tiU]
ILJ -----~
,
,
"'r
....<...1....-1 ~
...............
--
-
~
~II'I'
~llml'
UO!SU'BdX3 dOlS af5'BlS
-~-
...._.......PIO_
/
~~
/
/
I
~
V1V 'ua1V l:l J91f8M
-....
-...~
_'r.1__~
IOC_....~_IID_
IIII ~
~II L
~, a..
-,
""'"
-
~
~llll'l
II
IEEII!I
--.
--~
-~--.1.
.._.....~-.l.III)-
uo!suedX3 dOlS a6elS
VIV 'U9f\f 1:1 JalfBM
-~-
....._-11I)-
~I
\
@
"
'i;
~'
l
~
I
II
~
IIII ~
~II k
~
....'11 ~
4P
-----
~
-
.
_r.l~.l
a r.~;r UO!SU13d73d~is e513lS
~
\fIV 'uarv 1I J91fllM
--.
--..
_w_
__....__PKl_
'I
11'1 g
~,I L
"';j;J, c..
~
.
~i
~
~
~
t;
f
,-
-
-
! I
I I I' .
Iii i I! Iii!
IPI'11i ,'''II!'I!!l l ,I'I'! 'I
~ 'I II / I ! I
111111 illl/II! III !ll!ll !Il! II
1i!i!J!ulilhUhlilli!!l illll h
EJ GGG GElGG G G GGGGG
~I
~
I
II
II
II
~ll"l
~~illl'
....~-
__.-o:1P1)'"
UO!SU"8dX3 dOlS a6"8lS
VIV 'UGlY 11 JaIf9M
-....
-.....
_W"-.L
.._.....__J.~_
~
~
~
~i
IIII ;;
~II L
~~ a.
---..
""""
-
~GGGGG~G~BBGGBGGBG
'I
II III
I I
.
I !
I ..
II I" il
. II '11 I I II I
II "'IH I II f
Ill! ;111 III Ih I l! j! I
i! II 1I1l1i1!l il II I
i ,
.! I I
!I hIP II
"llllif II
illih.!lilill
~
~i
~
t
t
I
~i
I II
i !i
180mB :J!
a~;;[ UO!SUed-;~~S e5elS
Vl'v 'u9D\f '1:1 J9lf9M
-....
-......
_w_
.._....._...J.IID_
\
l
I~ j
"'0 · "'" It
.., ,I ::
6 II
i\>
!
!l
~
I
I
i
i~
-
--
--
-
080000088008000000
Ii I I I I' !! Pi! II! III II II I Ill!! i" I" ill
Iii' I', ~IPIII!1 i! II II I'! I ill,
II I I, i t 11'11 I! 'j II! I !II
I! III d ! i I.
'. ! I
I !
!
I
I
~
~
!
I
Stage S.!.~~~'pansion r~~ G
T.......CA~
Waller R. Alen, AlA
_CIIII__~_JlI
-~-
....-
....-
.
'J
I
i
I
I
,
,
!
i
!
I
I
i
.
I
I
I
I
!
I
,
,
I
I
i g
! ~
! ~
! ;
I I
I i
! i
! i
, .
! E
I ;
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
'"ll
I:II
IJ!!
l!::
1-
,z
.:l>
!~
! ~ i 'J@)
I ~ ' .~
lz
I"
"ll
~
fTl
X
~
Z
G)
(0
C
r
D
Z
G)
1.0.,0 Ii
11'1'1'11 ~
I'll; ~
i II! II
I 1,1 I
I HI I I
I II I
" .... R
'n
OI!!l!: . i
, III I
1m
I!ini!i&
I !
I I T
!!i ~i!1 , q
I I I , I
Slli ST1lEET Ii! ~If I
i i i ! I
, i lllal I
, I ,
I ! I
. l' ~Ia
. ! .
I ! I i
.
, E , i
E E
; ; ;
g So ~ fQ.f ffIO..ECI\ STAGE~EXPANSION
1:z~,...aRI.. C1l1H:flo '""''""''"..........'''''''.....-
-o~..!. T.. .~..,..,..;;..,.....-
~. ~" -~~
* j;: ~ TBe:u...l"c.UD:rrtlllllO~ CClNTAClIB>OOl:I.
;
z
::s~~
0.'.
C.9~~
z~~ ~
o~i ~
<(.~ w
0:::"" ffi
p "
C):ig
...J~~$
<(g"~
=>:!5~g
I-~w~
o.i~~
w~~o
<')i::;~(,)
Zf~~
om
u .
_"_~'__'a"'__
..............--.---.-'"""-. --
i i
o
~
~
.
.
~
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-_
G:\PlanningI2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
9
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA07-0176, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR AN 11,456 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO THE
EXISTING TEMECULA STAGE STOP COMPLEX TO
INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF A 4,257 SQUARE FOOT
OFFICE. RETAIL BUILDING, A 3,328 SQUARE FOOT
SECOND FLOOR RESTAURANT, AND 3,871 SQUARE
FEET OF ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS ON A 0.37
ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 28464 OLD TOWN FRONT
STREET (APN 922-023-022)
Section 1. Procedural Findinqs. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On June 11, 2007, Walt Allen Architects filed Planning Application No.
PA07-0176, (Development Plan), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula
General Plan and Development Code.
B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on October 17, 2007, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07-0176
subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. .
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Develooment Plan !Develooment Code Section 17.05.010.Fl
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City;
The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code
because the project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the
applicable policies and standards for commercial office development. The
proposed office retail building and expansion of the commercial use is permitted
in the land use designation standards contained in the General Plan and Old
G:\Planning\2007\P A07-0 176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PaPC Resolution.doc
I
Town Specific Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned,
is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as
conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare;
The overall design of the project, including site design, building height, setbacks,
parking, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended
to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The
project is consistent with all applicabie policies, guidelines, standards, and
regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed, and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Findinqs. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Development Plan application:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section
15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects).
A. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and
all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and
regulations;
The proposed land use for the site is allowed by the General Plan and zoning
designation of the Development Code and Old Town Specific Plan. The project
is consistent with all development standards, including setbacks, height, and
FAR requirements for the site.
B. The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site that is
less than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses;
The project is proposed on a 0.37 acre site surrounded by existing development
within an established commercial area.
C. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or
threatened species;
The property is not known to have any value as habitat for endangered, rare or
threatened species as it has been previously disturbed and fully developed.
Additionally, the project site is not recommended for habitat conservation nor
does it support or impact any habitat associated with the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Program (MSHCP).
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\PC Resolution.doc
2
D. The project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air
quality, or water quality;
Commercial development was anticipated for the project site and the land use
was analyzed as part of the General Plan and Old Town Specific Plan. The
project has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed
as part of the General Plan EIR.
E. The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services;
The utility and public service companies were notified of the proposed project
and no new facilities or expansion of existing facilities will be necessary as a
result of the project. Existing services are available and adequate to service the
proposed development.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application No. PA07-0176, a Development Plan for an 11,456
square foot expansion located at 28464 Old Town Front Street, subject to the
Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\PC Resolution.doc
3
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 17th day of October 2007.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 07- was duly and regularly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City ofTemecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th
day of October 2007, by the following vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\PC Resolution.doc
4
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
l
SCANNED:
G DRIVE:
PERMITS PLUS:
G:IPlanning120071PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\PlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
1
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I,
(print name) understand that Planning Application No. PA
has been approved with Conditions of Approval which are set forth in
Exhibit A. I have read the Conditions of Approval contained in (PC)(DH) Resolution No.
and understand them. Through signing this ACCEPTANCE OF
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, I agree and commit to the City of Temecula that I will
implement and abide by the Conditions of Approval, including any indemnification
requirements imposed by those conditions.
SIGNA TURE
DATE
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\Draft COA.doc
2
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA07-0176
Project Description:
A Development Plan to expand the existing Temecula
Stage Stop complex with the addition of a 4,257 square
foot office retail building over the existing bus bays, a
3,328 square foot second floor expansion over the
existing Temecula Wine and Beer Garden, and
associated improvements totaling 3,871 square feet on a
0.37 acre site located at 28464 Old Town Front Street
Assessor's Parcel No.
922-023-022
MSHCP Category:
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Commercial
Retail Commercial/Office
Retail Commercial
Approval Date:
October 17, 2007
Expiration Date:
October 17, 2009
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicanUdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00)
for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as
provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations
Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicanUdeveloper has not delivered to
the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted
shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document
that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an
original signature to the Planning Department.
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOOlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
3
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
,
G:IPianningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\PlanninglPClDraft COA.doc
4
Planning Department
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this project.
5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of
time, one year at a time.
7. A Sign Program for the T emecula Stage Stop complex shall be required subject to review
and approval by the Planning Commission.
8. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and
elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
10. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed
satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment,
finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required
by the condition of <Ipproval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which
case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal,
the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Wine & Beer Garden Building
Material
Exterior Wood Plank Vertical Siding
Exterior Wood Plank Trim/Trellis/Railing
Bent Seam Metal Roof
Color
Olympic Stain - Carmel
Olympic Stain -707 Tobacco
. Oldtown Gray
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPC\Oraft COA.doc
5
Metal Clad Wood Windows
Multi-lite Wood Doors
Trash Enclosure Stucco Finish
Office Retail Building
Material
Exterior Cemetitious Fiber Board Siding
Exterior Wood Trim
Certain teed Asphalt Shingle Roof
Metal Clad Wood Windows
Multi-lite Wood Doors
Metal Seam Window Accent
Bronze Clad
Stain to match existing Stage Stop
To match existing Stage Stop stucco
Color
Roycroft Copper Red SW 2839
Roycroft Vellum SW 2833
Sunrise Cedar
Linen Clad
Stain to match existing Stage Stop
Weathered Bronze
11. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonC!ble
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
13. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. . These
shall be clearly labeled on site plan.
14. The painted mural located on the north side of the property shall be replaced if construction
results in damage andlor removal.
Public Works Department
15. A Grading Permit for either rough andlor precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
16. An Enc~oachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
17. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
18. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent
post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent
non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering any storm drain system or receiving
water.
G:\PlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
6
19. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be accepted by the City prior to the initial
grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and include
site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment
mechanisms.
Building and Safety Department
20. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.1
21. The City ofTemecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees fora Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance
on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of
building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01
and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
22. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
23. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
24. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
25. Show all building setbacks.
26. Buildings shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of
exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site.
27. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
28. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998).
29. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
30. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
31. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
32. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlannlnglPCIDraft CQA.doc
7
33. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No 94-
21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No 457.73, for any site within
one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. -6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays
34. Prior to submitting for plan review, obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. Site
plan to indicate all suite numbering in direct correlation with addressing and proposed
buildings.
35. At time of plan submittal, restroom fixtures, number and type, shall be in accordance with
the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California building Code Appendix 29.
36. At time of plan submittal, provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel
schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan
review.
37. At time of plan submittal, truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and
the truss manufacturer engineer are required.
38. At time of plan submittal, provide precise grading plan to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
Fire Prevention Bureau
39. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal. .
40. Existing fire hydrants meet the requirements for the spacing in Old Town for this project
41. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2).
Community Services Department
42. Developer will protect in place landscaping along Front Street. Any damage will be
repaired, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services, at the cost of the
developer.
43. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
44. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
45. All landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the maintenance
association or property owner.
G:IPlanning120071PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
8
Police Department
46. All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their booklet on
the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association 1127-11 th Street, Suite
1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal Code 490.5 affords merchants the
opportunity to recover their losses through a civil demand program.
47. Any business that serves or sells any type of alcoholic beverage will comply with all
guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated
with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the Temecula Police
Department for inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes
special events held at business location where alcohol will be serviced for a fee and the
event is open to the general public. Furthermore, the business will maintain a current up-
to-date alcohol business license issued by the Riverside District Office of Alcohol Beverage
Control.
48. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the building should be removed or painted over within
twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Report all crimes to the Temecula Police 24-
hour dispatch center at (951) 696-HELP.
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanning\PC\Draft COA.doc
9
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:\PlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
10
Planning Department
49. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical
plans for verification of proper placement oftransformer(s) and double detector check prior
to final agreement with the utility companies.
50. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project
site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by
the Director of Planning.
51. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at hislher sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult andlor authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
Public Works Department
52. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
53. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
54. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
55. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
56. The Developer shall .have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Slop Expansion Major MOD\PlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
11
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream
facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
57. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading,
Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's
standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
58. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number
(WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of
construction activities.
59. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
60. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
61. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
62. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
63. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
64. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 ofthe City Municipal Code which may
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for reviewand approval.
Fire Prevention Bureau
65. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved Fire Department vehicle access roads. Fire Department access roads shall be an
all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
G:\PlanningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanning\PCIDraft COA.doc
12
66. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1).
67. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14).
68. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4).
G:IPlanningI2007IPA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
13
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:IPlanning12007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
14
Planning Department
69. A Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop complex shall be approved.
70. All downspouts shall be internalized.
71.
Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department for Phase 1. These plans shall conform to the
approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location
number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall
be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: one
inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for
final planting inspection".
c. A note on the plans stating that 'The contractor shall provide two copies of an
agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection".
d. One copy of the approved grading plan.
e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
f. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
g. The locations of all existing trees that will remain.
h. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
i. Specifications shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be
required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being
pressurized to 150 psi for a minimurn period of two hours without loss of pressure.
The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head
coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the
approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/owner shall contact the
Planning Department to schedule inspections.
c
72. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three foot clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen.
Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like
an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on
plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
73. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas, including but not limited to
trellises, deCorative furniture, and hardscape, to match the style of the building subject to
the approval of the Planning Director.
G:IPlanningI2007IPA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
15
74. A detail of the trash enclosure door shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
review and approval.
75. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange".
76. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals
shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied
over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as
closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
Public Works Department
77. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P .C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard No. 400.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
78. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and
other traffic control devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Sewer and domestic water systems.
d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
79. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
80. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
81. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
G:IPianningI2007\PA07-D176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOO\Planning\PC\Draft COA.doc
16
82. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Building and Safety Department
83. Prior to beginning building construction for each phase of the project, a pre-construction
meeting is required with the building inspector.
Fire Prevention Bureau
84. The developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention
Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire
service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention
Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and
minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground
submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on site hydrants. The plans
must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC 8704.3,
901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1). .
85. All locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle
access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall
of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed
for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet (CFC sec 902).
86. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three
sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention
Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit.
87. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets
of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel.
88. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the
wildland-vegetation interface (CFC Appendix II-A).
89. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures
shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or
block walls), and fuel modification zones (CFC Appendix II-A).
Community Services Department
90. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
G:IPlanningI2007IPA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
. 17
Police Department
91. A parking stall for one bus is required. The parking space should be approximately 33 feet
long x 16 feet wide. The stall should not block two-way circular vehicle traffic within the
City's parking complex off Sixth Street. If this is not feasible, adequate bus parking (pick up
and drop off point) shall be provided within walking distance of the Stage Stop Ticket office.
Anyon-street bus stop must be approved by the City. The parking stall shall be properly
marked with verbiage "BUS PARKING ONLY" stenciled with 12" lettering and proper
stripping within the stall.
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07,0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
18
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY
THIS PERMIT
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODIPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
19
Planning Department
92. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical
equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final
inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of
building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the
project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered
mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning.
93. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
94. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one
year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the
bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
95. All site improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
96. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
Public Works Department
97. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP
have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for
immediate implementation.
98. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
99. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
100. All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per
the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
101. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
G:IPianningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOo\PlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
20
Fire Prevention Bureau
102. "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3).
103. Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such
a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property.
Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family
residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with
suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six
(6) inch high letters andlor numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC 901.4.4).
104. Based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall
install a fire sprinkler system (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9).
105. Based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the
developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters
Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation(CFC Article 10).
106. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet
in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC 902.4).
107. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC 902.4).
108. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
109. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format
must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be
acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval.
Police Department
110. Upon completion of construction, the building shall have a monitored alarm system installed
and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to notify the
Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices, suites, businesses
located within a specific building should have their own alarm system. This condition is void
if business is opened 24/7.
G:IPianningI2007\PA07-o176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPianninglPCIDraft COA.doc
21
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIDraft COA.doc
22
111. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control
District's transmittal dated July 16, 2007, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or
money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the
District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
112. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated July 3, 2007, a copy of which is
attached.
G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-G176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlannlnglPCIDraft COA.doc
23
W AI<.... D. WILLIAMS
General Manager-Chief Engineer
"' . ',' ,.-,,'
, ~_ -.' -":1 ~';""'j ~
'''J' ..." II ..' ,
":J ::'::~i' .,." :'0,'
c_'C\'_
~ i
~~~~~:Rcg=~~~~g~~:tf1r-tr1;~r--
1995 MARKET STREET
. RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
\:i' '"'' 951.955.1200
. -'!. 951.788.9965 FAX
. hwwwJfl~dcontrol.co.riverside.caus
,:;r:.: { . l_~'
114772 3
July 16, 2007
City ofTemecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
TemecuJa, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Dana Schuma
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
PA07-0176
The District does not nonnally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in
incorporated Cities. The District also does not plan ,check City land use cases, or provide State Division of
Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District commentsirecommendations for such
cases are nonnally limited to items of specific interest to the District inc!udmg District Master Drainage Plail
facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which whld he considered a logical component or
extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan f.x..s (development mitigation fees). In
addition, information of a general nature is provided.
Ibe District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsem~Ilt of the proposfd project with respect to .flood hazard,
public health and safety, or any other such issue:
The entire, boundary of the property i.... within the 100 year Zone AE tloodplain limits for Murrieta Creek as
delineated on Panel No. 060742-00 I OB dated September 2, 1993 of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in
conj'IDction with ,the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA). A District flond study in 1987 detennined the base tiood. elevation for the master plan flow
rate of 38,300 cfs to be \ 007.84 (NGVD 29) at the location.
The \} S. krmv C..ro, Q( 'F:'l"ineers alOll" with the OJ,strict and the Cities of Teinecula' and Mwrieta are
working on the' desi~-ofthe M~rrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmen;al Restoration and Recreation project
(project), which has been Congressionally authorized. The proposed development is located within Phase 2 of
the Project, which is scheduled to begin construction in the near future pending Federally allocated funding.
Questions regarding the Project may be addressed to Zully Smith of our otlice at 95 1.955.1299. '
Until the proposed Project has been constructed, all new buildings should be flondproofed by elevating the
finished floor a minimum of 12 inches above the District's floodplain elevation of 1007.84.
This proje.ct i~ located within the limits of the District'sMurrieta CrCt~Urcmecllla Valley Area, Drainage Plan
tor which drainage fees have been, adopted; applicable tees should he paid prior. to, the issuance of grading
pennits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of isstl'ii.ce ofthe actual pennit.
114772_3
Mrs. Dana Schuma
City ofTemecula
Re: PA07-0176
-2-
July 16, 2007
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) pennit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation or other final approval should not be
given until the City has detennined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a FEMA mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all
studies, calculations, plans and other infonnation required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further
require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation
or other fmal approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
The applicant shall show written proof of compliance with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(MSHCP) for any drainage facilities the applicant proposes to be maintained by the District. All applicable
CEQA and MSHCP documents and pennits shall address the construction, operation and maintenance of all
onsite and off site drainage facilities. Draft CEQA documents shall be forwarded to the District during the
public review period.
If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant
to obtain all applicable Federal, State and local regulatory permits. These regulatory penn its include, but are
not limited to: a Section 404 Pennit issued by the U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers in compliance with section
404 of the Clean Water Act, a California State Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement
in compliance with the Fish and Game Code Section 1600 et seq., and a 40 I Water Quality Certification or a
Report of Waste Discharge Requirements in compliance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act or State
Porter Cologne Water Quality Act, respectively, from the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The applicant shall also be responsible for complying with all mitigation measures as required under CEQA
and all Federal, State, and local environmental rules and regulations.
Very truly yours,
~L/I, lJ~
MARK H. WILLS
Senior Civil Engineer
c: Ron Parks, City of Temecula
Zully Smith, RCFC & WCD
AM:blj
RIVCO-LAND USE
fax:951-955'B903
Jul 3 2007 15:19
P.02
~~ 0 i(;vUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTh SERVICES AGENCY 0
e~~ DEP~RTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
I ,
,
July 3, 2007
,
;
City of Temecula Plallllind Department,
P.O. Box 9033 [
Temecula, CA 92589.903i3
,
Attention: Dana Sohuma I
RE: Development Plan Nol. P A067-0l76
I '
!
Dear ~. Schuma:
Department ofEnviro~ Helilth has reviewed the development plan to ror a major lIIDdification to
the existing Stll8e Stop ctmPlex for the addition of a 5,246 square foot, two-story oflIce building on
the existing bus bays, a ,328 square foot second floor expansion over the existing Wine & Beer
Garden. The site plan do s indicate if water and sewer servioes exist, we assume that these services
are in and are available. j
I. PRIOR TO HE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PE:RMITS THE FOLLOWING
SHOULD BE EQUlRED:
a) "Will-server 1ettm from the appropriate water district.
b) If there are to be any food establisluneDt3, (inoluding vending machines), three complete
sets of pl~ fur eaCh food establislunent will be submitted including a fixture schedule,
a finish schfdule and a plwnbing schedule in orlla to ensure compliance with the
California lf~furm Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food
Facility PI, Examiners at (951) 461.0284. ,
I
I
~' ~^ ~ d
~e~jEHs
(951) 955-8980 in.Ij
NOTE: Any 011""" 1ll...1 n:qultelMltl nO!, covtn:<! can be oppUcoble 0' tun< of Buililio&' Plan rovlcw for fioal Doportmen, .r
. I!llm...-I HJ.tlh cl<llnlll<e.
!
Lo..1 Enl."......t Asonev . P.O. a.. 1280,l\\vorsido, CA92502.1280 . 19091 955.898Z . FAX 1909) 781.9653 . 4980 Lemon 51,..1, 91h Fl.or, Rlversld" CA 92501'
Load Ut. and W.te, [IIGUle..ine . W. Box 12~, RIV<!"id" ~ 92502.1206 . 1909) 955-8980' FAX (909) 955'8903 . ~080 L.m.. 5.,,1. 2nd F1.or, R;v."ld,. CA 92501
i ' '.
ATTACHMENT NO.4
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
G:IPlanning\2007lPA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MODlPlanninglPCIPC STAFF REPORT.doc
10
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental:
Case Planner:
Place of Hearing:
Date of Hearing:
Time of Hearing:
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING
COMMISSION to consider the matter described below:
Planning Application No. PA07-0176
Walt Allen Architects
28464 Old Town Front Street
A Development Plan for an 11,456 square foot expansion to the existing Temecula Stage
Stop complex to include the addition of a 4,257 square foot office retail building, a 3,328
square foot second floor expansion over the existing Temecula Wine and Beer Garden, and
3,871 square feet of associated improvements
In accordance with the California Environrnental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is
exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be issued in
compliance with CEQA (Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects)
Dana Schuma, Associate Planner
City of Temecula, Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive, Ternecula, CA 92590
October 17, 2007
6:00 p.m.
Any person may submit written cornrnents to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be
heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to,
the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Ternecula Planning Department,
43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Questions concerning the
project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400.
G:\Planrung\2007\PA07-0176 Stage Stop Expansion Major MOD\Planning\PC\NOPH-PC.doc
ITEM #4
DATE OF MEETING:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
CEQA:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
November 7,2007
Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters TITLE:
Associate Planners
Planning Application No. PA07-0180, a Major Modification to
construct a 4,034 square foot First Bank Building with drive-thru on
Pad L at Rancho Temecula Town Center located at the northeast
corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road
IZI Approve with Conditions
o Deny
D Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
D Categorically Exempt
(Section)
(Class)
IZI Notice of Determination (Section) 15162
D Negative Declaration
D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
G:IPlanning\2007lPA07-0180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
1
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: Joseph Jaworski, First Bank
Date of Completion: June 13, 2007
Mandatory Action Deadline Date: November 7, 2007
General Plan Designation: Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan (SP-1)
Zoning Designation: Community Commercial (CC)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Rancho Temecula Town Center (mostly developed)
North:
South:
East:
West:
Rodrigo's Restaurant (under construction) and Santa Gertrudis Creek
Pad K and Rite Aid in Rancho Temecula Town Center
Rancho Temecula Town Center retail
Senior Housing across Winchester Road
Lot Area:
40,877 square feet
Total Floor Area/Ratio:
4,034 square feet/.10
Landscape Area/Coverage:
14,324 square feet/35%
Parking Required/Provided:
14 spaces/27 spaces for Pad L
708 spaces for RTTC (with bank use)/973 spaces for
RTTC
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
Pad L was included in the master site plan approval for Rancho Temecula Town Center
(PA02-0364) as a 3,500 square foot retail building with a drive-thru lane. This approval (for the
center) included four pad buildings with drive-thru features. Staff previously raised concern
with the proposed drive-thru lanes for Pads K and L because these flanked the main entry to
the center off of Winchester, ana staff was concerned that the drive-thru lanes would be the
predominant visual feature from Winchester Road and the entry drive. As a result, Condition of
Approval #12 for PA02-0364 required that Development Plans for Pads K and L be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Commission. In addition, Condition of Approval #17 required a
structural component over the drive-thru lane compatible with the architectural style of the
building, rather than a basic trellis.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the
applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-G1BO First Bank@RTTCModIPianningIPCSTAFFREPORT.doc
2
ANALYSIS
The proposed 4,034 square foot building is proposed as a First Bank. The proposal includes
an increase in building square footage of 500 square feet, a reconfiguration to the parking lot
layout, and an additional drive-thru lane. The building is designed to be architecturally
compatible with the existing center.
Access. Circulation and Drive-thru
The proposed Major Modification includes minor changes to the access and circulation for Pad
L from the original Development Plan approval. Access to Pad L is taken from an internal
circulation drive that runs north south through the center. The proposed modifications include
the reconfiguration of internal drive aisles, parking spaces and landscape islands. The
changes result in the removal of 10 parking spaces along the main drive aisle access for the
bank, the relocation of seven parking spaces to along Winchester Road, and the elimination of
three parking spaces for the overall project. Also, a portion of the drive-thru has been
redesigned to widen to two lanes and then narrow back down to one lane as originally
designed so as not to cause ingress egress confusion in close proximity to the internal drive
aisle intersection. The widening to two lanes is to accommodate a traditional bank drive-up
and an ATM machine. As designed, the drive-thru is similarly located to the originally
approved site plan, which wraps around the building and is adjacent to the entry drive off
Winchester Road. The site plan indicates drive-thru stacking for seven vehicles, which
exceeds the six required by the City's Design Guidelines (pg. 88-29).
Parkino
The original approval for the center included 162,860 square feet of retail and restaurant
space. Parking requirements for the retail space was calculated at 1 :300 square feet and at
1:100 square feet for restaurants. Approved site plan calculations indicated that 729 spaces
were required; and 976 were provided (a surplus of 247 spaces). The Planning Commission
approved a Major Modification for Pad K in the center which resulted in the need for 15
additional parking spaces, thereby reducing the surplus parking to 232 spaces.
The approved site plan anticipated a restaurant use for Pad L using 1: 1 00 square foot
calculation. The site was anticipated to be 3,500 square feet and require 35 parking spaces.
The current proposal includes an increase of 500 square feet for this Pad; however the
proposed bank use parking calculation is based on a ratio of 1 :300 square feet. The required
parking for this proposal is only 14 spaces, and 27 spaces are provided. Consequently, with
the increase in square footage and the elimination of three parking spaces, the center will
provide 973 spaces, where 708 would be required with the proposed bank use, therefore there
would be a surplus of 265 spaces in the center. A reciprocal parking and cross-lot access
agreement was included in the CC&Rs for Parcel Map 30719, which ensures adequate parking
throughout the center.
G:IPlanning\2007lPA07-0180 First Sank@RTTC Mod\PlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
3
Landscapinq
The landscape area for Pad L (Lot 5) is 14,324 square feet or 35% landscape coverage. The
approved landscape construction drawings for the Rancho Temecula Town Center identify
177 ,624 square feet of landscaping or 20.2% landscape coverage. Staff has been diligent in
tracking the overall landscape coverage for the center as subsequent modifications and
approvals had reduced the landscaping to the minimum requirement of 20%. However, the re-
design of the area around Pad L has resulted in a slight increase of 1,413 square feet of
landscaping, which results in 20.1 % landscape coverage for the center.
The drive-thru lane will be screened with a combination berm and planting along Winchester
and at the corner of the entry drive to the shopping center. The berm will be 30 inches high
and Escallonia will be planted on top. Staff has included a Condition of Approval that will
require the shrubs 10 be maintained at 30" inches high resulting in a five foot combination berm
and vegetation to screen the drive-thru. Essentially, the landscaping along the drive-thru will
mirror the landscaping approved along the drive-thru for Pad K across the entry drive (only
slightly wider).
In addition, the south elevation facing the entry drive off Winchester Road includes a
landscape grid trellis for a climbing vine to enhance the elevation and further break up the
massing of the building.
Architecture
The design concept at Rancho Temecula Town is intended to resemble a mixed-use
development with second-story uses. False balconies with railings and windows with shutters
are located at strategic locations throughout the center. In addition, decorative lighting,
exposed beams, awnings, cornices, arches and mission style roof tile have been included to
provide interest and variation. The First Bank building contains most of these elements. The
project proposes to use the same colors and materials as contained in the original approval.
Staff has included a condition requiring the use of the same decorative lighting for the building
as is provided throughout the center.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on October 27, 2007 and mailed
to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved
Negative Declaration and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162
subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations).
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDA TION
Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Planning Application No.
PA07-0180 based upon the findings and the attached Conditions of Approval.
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
4
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Development Code Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use, as conditioned, is in conformance with the General Plan for the City
of Temecula and with all the applicable requirements of State law and olher ordinances
of the City.
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Temecula,
the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan, the Development Code and with all applicable
requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City of Temecula because the
project has been reviewed and it has been determined that the project is consistent
with all applicable zoning ordinances, State law and the General Plan.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public, health,
safety and general welfare.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and general welfare, because the project has been designed to minimize any
adverse impacts upon the surrounding neighborhood and the project has been
reviewed and conditioned to comply with the Uniform Building and Fire Codes.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 6
2. Plan Reductions (PA02-0364, Rancho Temecula Town Center) - Blue Page 7
3. Plan Reductions (PA07-0180, First Bank Pad L)- Blue Page 8
4. PC Resolution 07-_ - Blue Page 9
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
5. Notice of Public Hearing - Slue Page 10
G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-0180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO.1
VICINITY MAP
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-G180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
6
N
'A'
,,' " '.',..
,:.;- ~'_:~
. ','
~-
--
,
i
,I
,
j
i
!
!
I
I
I
,
I
ff
It
l;-
ff
CD
'"
$
,
,
j
i
i
I
--~ I
-----'
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PLAN REDUCTIONS
PA02-0364, RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER
G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-0180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
7
~.~.
E-<
ffi
u
~ ~ v
E-< :@ '~
-< g5
Us U)
I~
rTl
'~
E-< ~
o
5
~
('f
-
.~
t:O
o
t)
o
~N\~I
"" '" '" '\:: ~
O~Q 'Q'"
~~~,,-l
~~ ~\)
~,~~~
~"I
""'-, C>.,'.
~ C'>.I~.. .
=-:r"':
!!II-
~ >- .
rnl::
~iS:
pn
.. :'J" .
nn
.
I jl
. ' 'I' ,I
vO !l jf"
~~ iil Iii
A II! l~
t .~ lil!mm
~
o
~
.....
~'
\.!! '! ~
.~ r.~'~'
~ ~t!e ~\~
E ~~ g t ~ 5 .
ci' 6 '~-lid j
w la~~~~"
~> oU'O ~<;).
-'0 ",,,,e: ~I
~tV .5.55 <:l
OLL. EgO .
EO. ~~~ '
; z a. O-'tu .. ~
,8< !3fJ
.Q
----
~7
li i! ;I! Ie
~ 5 : ;
~ " -
i i ~ ~
~ ~ ~ E
::15 m
,I'. ~ ~.I
j..,' (Ii'
.. a:1
:: ..1!1
'11---1':;
.," 11I1
..
: -~.
. 'il1:(
(':'~'
l' -'-
.. lJi'BI
. ... ~VI
:,1:' lJii
II~
- ~
I" ~!!
I' .:11..,
. ,:: ill
tl....:
:t:; ftI i'"
'''''I It! ,::
,n ;~i
:~,k ttl !,:~
,'1 _~
';1 .,
,.~:
<:: \.~.
'II '
;,1" '
~ !
V" ,
.\"::1'( r,L,':.!'
I ,\ t.
I ,
I III1
... .11I
oiIllliI
i II Ig
!("I(~I
, ,~\ it.
"
'~,
,I'" ,
,. ": '",
",. ...
';",. ,,,.
',OJ I:::
:'j 1:vI'
';lill.J~
1)1 'V'
,;,' I;i
;. I!IiUl'"
:"'11 ,..
: ::: ~:~
," ~..
-.:..l~~2
':~1-
~
II
~ g
u
i
....
:j,.
'"..
rJa,..
,.,
OJ!-
~
~
i.
ffiU
q~
Ulu
!!; ~~~~
~ g~n
0: !J"'a....
"I~" ..,
:: e=:
.. 3..
I:. ("Ti.
", U::.
:: -!II
,
, --
:1 il il::
I Ii ,...
.., ::::11-
'-'J! II i:r
I' lI!J ,..
'",' .~
, .
\.
'i:
'iiI
, iE'
u Vii
:),;; flI'
.. illl
"!ll';~'
"o,:'j, !~:
--,~:~I II I:::::
~~i: ~~..
"'I::~[
',.. \.~.
.:i::m:
100 \ @...
2','", -~
. ::~~jJ " .J
),1 I
, -I ~I
II \'I( Ii
I~ II
j ... l~ '
Iii!.:
l/l/fal
'~'(,::I, 1m
:<.' !\ III
." ,
_1...1' "1 ._,
~1Y' ~ 11
f'l I' I..
\jll1!i
'-~)I .1iI~.
I"
":-,=5 = l.i
.:JI.~
):3
lD
~
o
:t
~
c5
o/l
~
(J)
Q.
o
J:
(J)
w
c::: h
0
~
!f
o/l
0 ..,
(J) o/l 0
:l
Q. - .i~' iii
0 (J) 0:
J: Q. w
(J) 0 !r L
J:
(J) ~U
q~
~ ~, ~
~~
~,
!i' ~ I~n
lEhH
II.H~
.. G~
'lit
-" ,~;'
.. i
. ..
..t
...-.'..~
,'; '!!
.. .,
..--'...
'.~= ,Il
I!~~~~~!~I'$~
~~iI ~~"" ~
!S~ """"
Ptt~~
E-.'.:..... M"
!!
I~ .;":=
"i .~
Iti!
.I~:~i
_.~; ~.
.I~~!
-I.~I.'~' ~1.
001 I::
:: I..
1',,1'(,: ~:
; :', '. ti~
---~-~
!-,I
," II
...
,
('iii
III
(~II
, III
II (Ill
, ,ill
II (~iII
--Ii I'rf .
:z I (!!! .
~ IlI1!i1
'~
~~
...,........~~
:J
? i I:"
'. ~I j-~~
:;. i! ,..
lf7-"=
..1 =1' \ .,
,t ...L~
'" .00' I.
'~I;; III
r;;II"I'(-~;'
I:: I:::
i" II'
"1". -. .
: \ 'CI00 ITi.'
-:-,.':It,'O' f 11-
,~. ::rj I.
i'1':lt'.
- j,1 I -<,
';'1':/ \.:J
l! .~ !~i
J fti,:,
..;.J'!J! ...
.-'ll~:I':(~,. ~;
'. ", ' I.,
I;;:~I~;
I::; t li~
::I'~- 'I'~:
00 ...
00 R."
i ! , i ,
"'-. , , ,.
l' " !
! , ,\
"
" 1(,
,
" , ~
" ."
"
l'f
W
tli~
zo
~~
w,'
~..
t;~g~
g~~
~o
~~
.~
<
~:1,.n
::-=
IO~
Z';.
~~2
oufa""
.""
~m~
~5!D
.
I~a~
~~~
om!';-
"m~
~50
.~
..
.w
'~~;I;
~~
s~
.~." :l ~
Wo
~~o
s~
.~t
n
.
.~'
~iw
.z
~~
-'ilo
,~~
~ ~ !! "
:e '" 0. ~
al 6"; .
'" 'f"";;!
g; g"
8 --
" '3,"011
II~
- ;
!
U i
~;
~ Q
~
~
~ a ~ ~
1I;j:J :J
if.. ..
II
r ill II
! !j4 ~f .;
,," If illl l:i u::
is ~II i~ i I . 1111
<A !,l ~1! ~ ,ill"! @ji !!iH!
'~ Illhlll ~ :; :::::: mm !!!!!!
::il:i :i:i :i:i:i :i:i:i;i:i ~ I ~
> ,,! II I I! I!I!!
~i i !!!!~!!!:!!::::, I'; :!~ t " .,
~~ 1:1ll11l11!1J1l!! I 'I
>: . ;'1;
*' 11...lU-il.iiiii 1,'1" 1,'1' 1,1
i IlIIlIIlIlmll I
iJj ..' I J I UJ I I II J I II I
~ ~ ~,! I!; ; ; i ; ; ; ; ; i i i ;;; i
r fil !ill ~10 , I I'
I l!I ~ I ~!j! Ii. ~ . . ~ . ~ . . . . . . .. r l..
'" 0 o. -, <; II .., ! w
E:) ~ .~a ~ .... _ C)
.:ol~ ~!I~tfd~ir!~~!!!l!!~!!!!!_' ~
,~ w I.; 0119 . - . _ _ _ - " . . _ . . . . ii 8
~ 2 - m di I - ~ ill i Ill-I""! H I I II . I !to: l 9
:s · ~I ~
illl i ~ i ~
i~lj ! f 5 ~II
v . r.11~~
i
I,
.
,
'.
Ii'
..I
r
d
Hi
~
/---......
~~~~ ,~..
...;::::-
~..
,I
I - >IBlD1llnWSO'f'J.lMl -- J
~
~
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PLAN REDUCTIONS
PA07-0180 FIRST BANK, PAD L
G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-G180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
8 '
8~~g'::jnt 0
z.9.9ci ~s:: ~
~~!::l~iD~ ~
q%%~~ ~ rJ)
SJgH~~~Q ~
~~ ~~i= ~
~ :G~ (") 0
. - "
~ tv !=?
(");'~Qw:!! ~
~x..%O>;;u ""0
~':":c:>g;Z~ ~
~~$-s::if~ ~
:':''Q;~o~^ :-:l
glp~~~
...........0......-
l>>~~8:g"
~N -.
. "
~ ;!;
~
"TI"l;J(/)cn......z>
$(::;ii ~ ffi~; ~
":"':"Ci>~' 6:5- g:G) r-
~~~C3.cna 52
~-o;;-!!!.!!.g5 ;
(lO <0 ~?- 5' Q. -i
~:!: ~;s:o U)
~;:::; >> 0 $- :>
......0; a 0>.... I~
...... ~~j I~
~ 0
. "
- ~
~
o
~ ~,~~
%, "",' ~
,!l \ ~ /It
-. .. J ~
iJ~I',/?
~p..,
I~d)
I~ q
~~~ ~ ~
'fiClO - 1>
'1m ' ~
; ~ ~
~~ :.~!
':";::0 m
~~' ~
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ -
-----
\
'. I ~. ,
/1
'i'V
t"
Ii
'i
Hi
~nl.l
'I
,
.~ ill
l
"<I I
i-~'~~~,~~,~
-I -.;I,;;U \0 0 ~ ~
~ ~ I ~ }~ ,1~ ~ (5
~ I ~ I ~ t~ I~~ ~ ;
~ i ~.I q !~ i:rn ~
'" I ~ 1 I Ij~lfJl
I:::! I t 110
~ I Ii !r.
.. i I~~ 11~ N :::
aa 16 i~<I':~ ~
m I~ iF=; It) ~
~ i I!~I q ~
m I ,
U) i ' ,
I'" I
, I I -
or z ~
:> --t c ::0
I -.;10): o;S: m
I ~j; :2: ON 1"Tl m ""0
I (")n 0 --t;;u;;U
I P:!~d~ ~ ~ 0 8
(/)--t;;urn~G) fTi "Tl m
i ~ ~ ~
~
m
;:
m
z
,.
UHF
!'~r'
l:[.li
f~[:.
- ~,-
lUlU il~n~!~I~!i~
p.Uf !ii'~iLj,!i'~:i'M
""i"! "C" ~" ~"~
~ Hi I'~~~~~~'~~',
~ i.,lrg S. I~:s.~ 2 N
~ i II!!. ;3.11 2. 2. 01
} InnH ~
I ...
~
c
~
~
~i::;;!
:gi~
~:Ic:l
~ z
m
"
l'l,
TT
I I ~
~
t; ~!l" "
Z 55 0 ~
o ^ G> m
~ Z ).. $!
:> G) ;;U G)
~ ~ ~ ~
" I~!"
I
~ i Iii
.... (/).(/)
I; 'n:~
I~ ~ I~
I I
~
'"
z
,0
.........llil...T...A<OnIITl'",..&J~ITl'F1AH 'AD.LI5!N5K1 Dnn...~_NO'Y.'2tl<!n
)>g!
t\)lC
-
FIRST BANK
RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER, PAD "L"
TEMECULA, CALlFORNtA
TEMECULA PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETiNG -
NOV, 7, 2007
='
II
11
II
il
II
'~-~I~
:::"""'..:;::-::.-.:i:-
:-I'-~
o 0
'i!1'i!
~ ~
m z
:; ~
PI>
:l;!~
~!'
, I
,
~T; JlT~T~-'-I~ [i!1~-'~z'Ojll;
-IlcnoooIZZ'''''' J:>
i:ll~ III!I~I~ ~II'; I ~
:>ozozl'ijm7'
:::0 "Tl CI c: -l (/) I en
~I~ 5i1~ '~lgl"'l! ;'
o I' m '11 ~ liill~ ~ CD
~ I i ~ ~ S ~ i)!li i I
S I l[ ~ ~ 0 ~ i:[ ~ i rTl
~ I i ~ I i I ~ HI ~i
~ ,; III rn i!!1 0"
j ~ )1 1)1 I IIIi I
.
! ~
p
~
~
p
~
~
~
Do"..~
-----.--...............,.,
....._,.............._-~................_-
-...----
Thomas D. Auer, NCARB
Architect
m
~
1>150.-<-.............."., .--"",,,,,,, ___.0,..
NEWGROUND
I
,
,
I
I
i
I
I
.
,
!
.
i
I
I
I
,
!
.
!
.
,
I
!
I
I
.
I
I
.
.
I
I
i
I
.
j
!
,
I
!
I
,
I
i
.
I
.
.
.
~
.
.
I
i
I
I
!
I
,
!
I "'lJ
I :D
m
I r
. s::
.
I Z
.
I )>
I :D
, -<
j "'lJ
r
. )>
I z
-l
. Z
,
I {;)
"'lJ
r
)>
z
. (1) @ 0 i
.!l e 0 000
Wl~,!' H!mi!
!., c^.1 ~ l' II f> ~ II '"
f> ~.. ~ . i
:11 IPI I II' I
~ ~ .
~ i tlji ~i !B I
h' I I
II i
q
; I 1m j' !il ,
!' I
i Iii II ~li I
! I I! ! ,
.
~
i i Ii i g., m
I n . .
IH
, , .
! ! ~!:::fi " .. . ~
.
, ~ ~..~~ " 'iJ .
, .1.. " !
, .. ! -
I , hI! Ii !"
I H
a , I U
; I ,Hi
. .
. ~ i
! ~r
H
I
. "'cco: .. .n ,
.
i!l!il!ii
!iil~'l
Ii! 1!11
. "!!
i j I!II
,1.1,
, !
Pili I
.pl ~
! I i
-;OJ-ti
~ ~ ~ !
~ l) ~ ~
;:l;:l;l;'l
. . .
".
, , ,
nl
: :;@
c.... 0 U) 0.. <> 0..
o - :I: 9. i"a
000 _ 1"'1!'! ~~
l'z;r-~gz.n
~9::..!. ~ u
~ - ~
.. ,<<
~ pp
i
i
I
i
,
I
I
~
.
~
,
\
'"
~
!<
m
"""""', RANCHO TEMECULA PAD L
"""" A1ST BAN<
Il$Mo,EIWEC"'lE_
cu.YTlltl,in_l'ti~F....c~COI'IfACT..IOE.Mwt'IfSI
--------1
if,
!Il
i
j
i
roo T:-n-~
: 'I'
i i a
I ,il
. Ii
ili
-II
Iii
iil
,ii
"
,
J~
m
.b
'~
'r
>
~.
I.
1
O ALHAM8AA ClAOlP
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
. CAMomia license 12017
. RECllEAflOH FAClUTlES PlANMNC
l--:''!1''~\t''"~"';t~
~ '::II
- -~
I.. ~a
I !
~ 1: I ; ; _: i
Hi ! i ;
p; i
, ! ~! I ~
~ fl~ ~ Il. ..
· !, I ot;;
! " i ~ ~~.
I, ~ ~ ~~ ;
<5 ~ rJ ..
l ~ =
I ~ ~
~
~CI)
o
~ ~~~~i!~~"~~' '~I'~"'"
~
~,
;~ ~~':.i':.i':.i::;:;;lSlS':.i"':.i~':.i':.ilSlSl
~
l:l
>.. ~ l .
~ .l{.l ~t '
~ l~. I' .' I
~ ~il~1 'II i
~1~~~IHI !
~~ ;~I!IHII H! III
"'~ Iml I' I ,II
~ 1-1'1 lml!UIII, 'II
" ~'II;;"'''II'' I
"," . '."" III
~ Id!U .l'!ihmj li~ ~ '
~ ~ ~1l~1~II~lIl!mih I!~ i Ii
.dJ- -I
~~".o..,
;2~ ~ :;~
~10)-: '<: !5 Ii:!
, .
~ ~
.""
l,!; I ~r!: : ! i~;~ ·
:1:1;1 i'll! l I :~il i
11 i:~!: II H:I'i, i
~;I!1 l i~ ~ '
"~: ' I ~i!!! ,
l>l I Illi!l ! 1111l! I! ~ !~,h!,"m,'
. !II~ 111~11 ll' !!~: il! ll;!H m!!!!!
~i lii!'! ~I;I :I! il!l!,mmm
!.I,\~!I ~'!!iI "IIIII,m~ml~1
il!!li 111!1!1: ill ,lil~pHmH,
!llli: !i I; iM i! hnmM m III n
~ 1, I' i ~ !II ~ I j 'II'
I I!ll !' II :1' !i III I fi!i 'l~
~ II ~I . ,I 'I 1,1 sl i! ~ I 'IH- 1 i
~~: ;,:j :jll :~! ;' li: dl:i;'! il:ili I:
I'! hi" \ ,l, I i" 'I' U! I,llil 'j'i
i i i! il;l! ;;, :t Illi II !:lII!'I;I!' :I!ll! li1i
! III II;III!l II! i;li I'i 1!!II,M!11 Illll! i:!l
; Ii ii I~ ~ iii !~i ,Ii !iii ~Iilli ~~! !!~
,
iil :II~ ! III ! "., ~ \ 'I' '!I~i~ i~ '''N'l S
I!! l!h "~l III ~ , i 'I 'II' ~"~lIi !!!~, I 'll~~ 'IWI ~ · ~ 1 fill' !:s' O!'
ill jii~ ~111 il;niil! ! 11!!lli II! ~ !!~ !I!ii 1;1!!11111 i !itl! :ili'li i!; !;I(; !~I,I Il'l! ~ il
~ i!il :I~i! ~ ~!~!m;! 1!!i11fl: !1:!II!i Iii I 1 i!l II!illl;'!I!l Ili'l i iU!I!!I!ii III I. I~ !!!Ii! i!:!li i ! ~~ i I
I :1:, !l!ll ~ ~i'!l :!I! :i.lh ~! ;hdM :!d i ;11 !I!,I! :_dhll !I,1l ;1 ;!I!!l !'!'l !'l :' :1 !Mh ~dd ! I.D\ i i
.. ~~, ld~
~
<:( ~~ l!!
.......'"
Q,,<::Oi
<:l oq: <') ~
~ CQ Q" ~
t:l <:(,;
<:( ..... :l;; ~
l5(1)...~
.... ... ~
...- 00
lJ) i':' It: "
-.....<:(
o Q"
~
I~m
l!'~~
hI::
,-
II
i~."
Sl'jj
l.;~~
b"
~"".,,,
'\ : '<0.
I
~ II
I~~
f \
-~~=-
" !
''I
II
.
g
i oil I
I! .
I l
.
l'
;
"
.
j
S
f
I
I
I
I
I .
.. -,-' I I P
-1.g,) < '\: ~.~
","Ii (.;, ,~ ~ 1 ~,,;; I
~~~ l~ ~ \, I. ~.m-I
o - ~ '\ '" It M'n~..j j
I '\ ",' 1
I ,g"
'~ SS3:J. V3Ylj
mt. I. ,or
~ : €> 1 I
I "I' ~~ N I
'", -ll I
~" w
~ 01
~I '
0... ,
I O::::JNIl'l
,
1 Oil
L~!l
'm!I!'
'IDllll!
l!
l!
'I
[1?
HI- ~~
! j;1,
'"
~
I '"
,
: 'i I
t
.
..
I
l"
,,~
~,
IU
'I .
<>
~ I
l 11"
~-'l- "I
~ ~ ~
~ ~
'I! '"
.
l'
"
"'~
~~
~
'"
,
,
~~
-:.~...
, II
,
I~
I I
1 I
I I
1 I
y
I 1
1 I \: ~
\
'!;~I @ ~
'"
I 2c ~
,~ ~;,
~ '<(i.~.. 3
';i ~~
~I~
I
'Ill
1 ~
I
r
J
ir
~
f--.tt------1
E~~I.
""
rr-'~=
-1\ ""
---1
o ~~
<(U
a..
= "x,IIJ
"
I/) 0
-l
W
o
0:::
<(
0...
-
11--:]
~ L___
"'"
"4'-
" I
.3M1.l07
- ,(JgrJ61 "l.14~.rLlY -
~-------
I~ ..
...
I
..
.. b
..,
--I 1--
L~
-----l
1
lil :;~
~:
~ ~~
i!
"
e~
~~ ;
E~ ~
~~ ~
.
. g
~
i i i l'5
I I i
i
I .
, ~
;sh i ~
~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~.
ls
I.~~
L~W
~
" !
.A(:I~::..-;; ~ ~ I
II
.
'I
I , ,il!
: I! i
I
I
I
Ii! II
,OO~ I I
'll(.la~.N I!
.
j"1
'I
1
t
I
;
"
~
,
I
I
"i '" I
< ~g:::! ~
i ,'z I I
i~11
~~!
III!
.
,1, ~, :f1 :11 :1 ~Tj '1
:~ "
'11'11 "i '!I ,Ii
I~ I ,~ Ii I f
~ . I IE
I . ..m I I
, I 7(j)
,....
I . m I I
. I r
I . m I I
<
. I l>
11 ....
6
z
,
.
I,
I'
i
i
~
I I
~I! :i! ,I!
,II 'Ii 'I~
! [ j
@@i)@@ @GHE'Hill]@d @ @l @:See i
"'m 1"'I'Wi"''''"O'!'I,!' '.'" '~,
ii!liji!i'I!;!!,hl.' 111,1, I!iji!r,
Illt!!ii!li'I!'I~!i!ijilhll :111'i!!1 !
oill"" l' ,g;"'l,'ll,'j"'! !
; "l",'i!i'~'j ji" h!ri 1',,1 ill! I'
I' I ,.~! ' "'!I"'li ' ,~ Iii'
" '; ->,. z 201 F ~ !iI~jJ .. ~~ ~ _ 6 .
""! ,I lh! ~ i' d!. II,! 1..0,-'
1 . 'I' l' "1 ,; .", !", I'~'
! I,! " !'i ; i ~ !II i;~1 ,1, ,I
"II ., ".10"
<l ~ . i ~ ".. ~~~ iO~ ~
!!I'i'"IP'TW' ;
I!,!rli~!,m!!il!!h '
II Il'!illl!!i'!
"I' i~ i"'ii!!!!!
l!!,~ '%~l'~il
Ill' illl'~ i.,'I:11
.~ il e., ~ f ~<l
II !i!i! l!lll!
'. I!I I ",'
,. \'1 '"
"! r
<5>%<5>"'01
H!H
<> <> <> <> <>
lllll
~ ~ 2 Q Q
11111
; Iii I
H!H
q"
.........ll;fLT..all.OK>ELEvA1ICI'e ..O,LI5lN$K1 Dn""..~_"lOV.'.2"""
DoNotRepn>dt>c<
-----~.._..-_...-
"'......................_......_.........-01..........
.-..-......-
.~,
""","UAI<' Thomas D. Auer, NCARB Architect
)>g!
~:g
-
FIRST BANK
RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER, PAD "L"
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
w
~
....._0-,...,_....... c-......,..." ....-.....
NEWGROUND
TEMECULA PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING -
NOV, 7, 2007
,h ,~ :!ll ,1,
.Ii :'1 l!'oli
;~ 'I ;,
I I'
H" I , m
'0 I ;'1:>-
" c '(j>
..., '..,
I
m m
r
r m
m <
< I>
I> ..,
.., 5
~ z
~
@@f)@@ @@0@Ql(j:J @ e @390;
Ilm!!lII!!!il!lii!I!II!!!!I!!iill~1
1!1~!I'!I'lli'il-I'li!,Ii!1I'III~ ill,I'hll !
'i'll"1 'S""i'/"'I'! I
i.. ,'lli 'I h!, /! II I I!'
I! Ii! 11,1'" i~ij!!il ill! .il' I
, ~ i;! ,! II! i , . l!.. !l.! loJ i
, . 'I' " !ll ! ~ i '.1. I'" I;~l
"1!" i1 '" II! ", ".
~ - ~~ 'l ~ ~ l ~ ~ i ..i~l {i~~ ~
, ll'l ' ,.", '0, I
II " ...~,- ! t ~
..._ ~~1 _BlI0N:'oElFvATIGt6 'AO.lI6N5K1 .......~ _ NOV.12=1
)>g!
UllC
-
FIRST BANK
RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER, PAD "L"
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
l, !P"i!'VTllr I "';};}<iY0i
1!,/il!!d!!Ii/Ul! !!!!!
l!!!h!!ill!il'll! :1:11
I!I II 1!'II~j!\ii ",.,
h"! !lli "110' I H H
'Ii i , '/' ,10 . I ' I '
., i; ~ ~ ~ i !5~ i i ~
I!I lill !I!',il'! '1lllll
III! I,: I
.1 \'1' 'I! ,i,
~ ~ ~ ~ , i ' ,
, !
~~-
------...-........--
....-.-.........-.............-..--
-...-.--
-
<-.""" Thomas D. AUeT, NCARB Architect
TEMECULA PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING -
NOV, 7. 2007
n1 ',........o-r...,......__~""'...".........,..
IIiiiiJ ,......._..._ NEWGROUND
~~~~"'x~ :;'.."".:.'';'
et
~m
~x
b=l
."
"'
l>
Z
l>
r
~
(j>
(ji
e!
~~
>0
~ 0
IU
II
r
l>
Z
'~~'P
"lft!
!~."i
lHP.
',- 8'
',IPfii
h~ !s
fU:~
tu~>i
~'!'~li
~ '
""... 2~' T..."'/'lf'JRA""
)>
W
I~"~
iI~~1l:
r
~~~e !i~i ~ift~
I!' I" I"
K".~
i'~~i
lill:
I
!'-'
d~'
I,'
I
I!'t
I~ft~
1\
~
6-.~
d'l
1,',
! .
I
~.. ~ ~.....~
~~~i: P~I
I"~ {
! !
8"-~
d"
'"',
. .
,
I
8"~
ill;
I!~ ..
I
8n~
d"
,""
"
,
I
t;"'".
~i~i
'I"~
I
J.
~
Ul~';Ti' ,,' ~ qrq, ~
j:;-u iii m [!] c;~L 001: CJi!' .
Ti:~c!l ICll ~B'k1 l~ 'ilflJ' B
,_, dHo iii 11Ff"'RJ
!:'~,:: Ii] ) 11!;_~," ~I:
L~l'i'= I!I ~
I ~~ .'~~ :"
I;~~:~~c'~i~-T @~"--l ~ ~:.o
l'~--l rf[ti"-'\'S;: \._ ~i nl
;, ~~;;- n.d:!! ~:Tc.JiJtlh p\,,,;
Hit I~n"il 61 ::~j:>.mr..r'~" i L '=-- )
;;~,,!. _ ~o Ll !r~ /"Y..L:....::.....Ofj---ll ~
!!!it~{f7t:",/jf~t,:8':- i~-" I' ,......... ,~
~ - - ~~;-.:=..1: i ~ ji ~ i --------, ~i~~~
I ,,' A,~00 '0 ::h
." "0_'" , . , -, [ST-'- ,,,,,
n~ ~n~O , .- I i~;!,__;._,'i. . z "
!~~ iii! ; ," ;i . j,.. il!!i
~.\~
.;:~
..~ _..~ .- NOY.12l!l01
Ul FIRST BANK
:r
:g RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER, PAD "L"
- TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
TEMECULA PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING -
NOV. 7. 2007
I
!'
~I om me gGe mmmm g DD
Ii
I"
e!
.,
II
I.
,
I
....1'
!
Ilt.....II..IIIII.IIIII~II!~
I,
it~.i...'4..~iit~:r:!!~;,11
l
~"'---} i ~-.~...~-..-~~ ..,;
~
---+1'
I
~-~~.~...~~..~.. .;
,
,
~..~~~j~
::::====ttttttttt======f;!'
~~~~1"11"""""""'1 ~
"'
DoNoo~~
-----...-..-'"'-
:.::..-:-....:.::"..:.::.::.:....._......0_..__
-~
==tt,,-....-
Thomas D. Auer, NCARB Architect
IrJ
~
""._-.....,....... .......~""-, -,'"
NEWGJl.OUND
e!
~~
~ ~
11
r
I>
z
'~f,n',
t. ','
. ~ i=
f!!mh~
&: 1l.2~
!~.i ~i
H~!!!
"i!iU
i, ijH~
~ Hi
Ii I
"a
<.r'
~~i
- .
~:;
y~.
o <
,
,
,
,
"
"~~ ~
\ -l~~-
\\!~n
,
\'
,
.€i
.......~T"''''''"''...AN
)>Ul
W~
l>> ~
..O.LI51N!\O<;1 _..~ '"" NOV.1,lr>erl
FIRST BANK
RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER, PAD "L"
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
51>
, 0
~t>
:1
m
0 ()
;r:
m
0
I>
0 --<
;\J
a
0
-n
TEMECULA PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING -
NOV. 7, 2007
<________ [U
0'
I
- ".~~~"'~~
~~
& ~
,...~
~
~
1\
I
\
'ii!!1
~T_
[)o"""~-"'"
-----.-..---.-...........,.
....-.....-..----.......-....-
.-..-.--
Architect
Thomas D. Auer. NCARB
m
:~~~w~
I>.,.'-O;-'................_~""t>o" .......,.
NEWGROl,lND
ATTACHMENT NO.4
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-_
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0180 First Sank@RTTC ModlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
g
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA07-0180, A MAJOR MODIFICATION
TO CONSTRUCT A 4,034 SQUARE FOOT FIRST BANK
BUILDING WITH DRIVE-THRU ON PAD L AT RANCHO
TEMECULA TOWN CENTER LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD (APN 920-100-040)
Section 1. Procedural Findinos. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A On October 20, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Planning
Application Nos. PA02-0360 General Plan Amendment, PA02-0360 Specific Plan
Amendment, PA02-0364 Development Plan, PA02-0365 Tentative Tra.ct Map, and
PA04-0540 Conditional Use Permit, all pertaining to the approval of the Rancho
Temecula Town Center.
B. On June 13, 2007, Joseph Jaworski filed Planning Application No. PA07-
0180, a Major Modification to an approved Development Plan, in a manner in accord
with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on November 7, 2007, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07-0180,
subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findinos. The Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Development Plan. Development Code Section 17.05.010Fl
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinance of the City;
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of
Temecula, the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan, the Development Code and with
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0180 First Bank@RTICModlPlanningIPCRESOLUTION.doc
I
all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City of
Temecula because the project has been reviewed and it has been determined
that the project is consistent with all applicable zoning ordinances, State law and
the General Plan.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public, health, safety and general welfare;
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare, because the project has been designed to
minimize any adverse impacts upon the surrounding neighborhood and the
project has been reviewed and conditioned to comply with the Uniform Building
and Fire Codes.
Section 3. Environmental FindinQs. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Major Modification for Pad L at Rancho Temecula Town Center:
A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the
Planning Commission has considered the proposed Major Modification. The Planning
Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration
("MND") for, the Project, approved by the Planning Commission as PA02-0364 on
October 20, 2004, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, and
the subsequent environmental reviews required as mitigation measures identified
therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major
Modification does not require the preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative
Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA
Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission
also finds that the proposed Major Modification does not involve significant new effects,
does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new
information of substantial importance which shows that the Major Modification will have
one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the MND. All potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposed Major Modification are adequately
addressed by the prior MND, and the mitigation measures contained in the MND will
reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. A Notice of Determination
pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) is
therefore the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Major Modification, and
no additional environmental documentation is required.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application No. PA07-0180, a Major Modification to construct a
4,034 square foot First Bank Building with drive through on Pad L at Rancho Temecula
Town Center located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road,
subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0180 First Bank@RITCMod\Planning\PCRESOLUTION.doc
2
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this ih day of November 2007.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 07- was duly and regularly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the ih
day of November 2007, by the following vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-0t80 First Bank@RTICModlPlanningIPCRESOLUTION.doc
3
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-G180 First Sank@RTTC ModlPlannlnglDran COAs.doc
1
SCANNED:
G DRIVE:
PERMITS PLUS:
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I, (print name) understand that Planning Application No. PA07-0180 has been
approved with Conditions of Approval which are set forth in Exhibit A. I have read the
Conditions of Approval contained in PC Resolution No.
and understand them.
Through signing this ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, I agree and
commit to the City of Temecula that I will implement and abide by the Conditions of
Approval, including any indemnification requirements imposed by those conditions.
SIGNA TURE
DATE
G:lPlanning\2007\PA07-0180 First Sank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft COAs.doc
2
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA07-0180
Project Description:
A Major Modification to construct a 4,034 square foot
First Bank Building with drive-thru on Pad L at Rancho
T emecula Town Center located at the northeast corner of
Nicolas Road and Winchester Road
Assessor's Parcel No.
920-100-040
MSHCP Category:
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Commercial
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Approval Date:
November 7,2007
Expiration Date:
November 7, 2009
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Eight
Hundred and Sixty-Four Dollars ($1,864.00) which includes the One Thousand Eight
Hundred Dollar ($1 ,800.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus
the Sixty-Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Determination for the previously approved Mitigated or Negative Declaration required
under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section
15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the
Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall
be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document
that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an
original signature to the Planning Department.
G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-0180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPianninglDraft COAs.doc
3
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-G180 First Sank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft COAs.doc
4
Planning Department
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this project.
5. This approval shall be used within two years ofthe approval date; otherwise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3, one-year extensions of
time, one year at a time.
7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
8. Building signage shall be consistent with the approved Sign Program for the Rancho
Temecula Town Center.
9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and
elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring Ihe landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
11. The applicant shall paint a three-foot x three-foot section of the building for Planning
Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. '
12. The applicant shall submitto the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft COAs.doc
5
13. The Condition~ of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed
satisfied by staffs' prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment,
finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substanlial equivalent of that required
by the Condition of Approval. Staff may electto reject the request to substitute, in which
case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal,
the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Material
Main Building - Stucco
Tower - Stucco
Cornice - Stucco
Trim - Stucco
Fabric Awning
Stone Veneer
Color (to match)
Frazee CW022W "Soft Gold"
Frazee AC113N "Spiced Rum"
Frazee 7752W "Oak Bluff'
Frazee 8846N "Bernard Brown"
Sunbrella 4678 "Marine Blue"
EI Dorado Stone, Rustic Ledge, "Sequoia"
14. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These
shall be clearly labeled on the site plan.
15. Parking for the project shall be shared across the site, including parking spaces in all lots
that are a part of the project. If the project involves multiple lots, the applicant shall submit
to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use Agreement, which
provides for cross-lot access and parking across all lots.
16. Decorative light fixtures shall be provided consistent with the light fixtures on existing retail
buildings in the Rancho Temecula Town Center.
17. Unless modified herein, the applicant shall comply with all other Conditions of Approval
associated with Planning Application Nos. PA02-0360 General Plan Amendment, PA02-
0360 Specific Plan Amendment, PA02-0364 Development Plan, PA02-0365 Tentative Tract
Map, and PA04-0540 Conditional Use Permit all pertaining to the approval of the Rancho
Temecula Town Center.
18. Mitigation measures shall be completed as per the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted
when the Development Plan (PA02-0364) was adopted.
Public Works Department
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review
a nd revision.
19. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public, Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. '
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0180 First Sank@RTTCModIPlanningIDraftCOAs.doc
6
20. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City righl-of-way.
21. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
22. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent
post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent
non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering any storm drain system or receiving
water.
23. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be accepted by the City prior to the initial
grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and include
site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment
mechanisms.
24. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Rancho Temecula
Town Center (PA02-0364) as approved on November 23,2004.
25. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract
Map No. 30719 (PA02-0365) as approved on November 23, 2004.
Building and Safety Department
26. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code; 2001
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
27. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance
on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of
building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01
and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
28. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
29. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building and Safely Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
30. Obtain all building plans and, permit approvals prior to the commencement of any
construction work.
31. Show all building setbacks.
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft COAs.doc
7
32. Buildings shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of
exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site.
33. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
34. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1 , 1998).
35. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
36. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
37. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
38. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
39. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-
21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within
one-quarter miie of an occupied residence.
Monday~Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays
40. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. Site
plan to indicate all suite numbering in direct correlation with addressing and proposed
buildings.
Fire Prevention Bureau
41. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
42. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2).
Community Services Department
43. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-0180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft COAs.doc
8
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
\
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft COAs.doc
9
Planning Department
44. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical
plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior
10 final agreement with the utility companies.
45. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project
site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by
the Director of Planning.
46. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. 'Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Direclor of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
Public Works Department
47. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property. '
48. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
49. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a regislered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavernent sections.
50. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction.
51. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected frorn this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recornmendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-G1BO First Bank@RTTC ModlPlannlnglDraft COAs.doc
10
facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
52. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading,
Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's
standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
53. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number
(WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stonnwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of
construction activities.
54. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
b. Planning Department
c. Department of Public Works
55. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
56. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
57. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
58. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
59. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Waler Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, basedon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Fire Prevention Bureau
60. Prior to building construclion, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved Fire Department vehicle access roads for use. Fire Department access roads
shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
61. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2:2.1).
62. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) ,
G:IPlannlng\2007\PA07-G180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft ,COAs.doc
11
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:IPlanning\2007lPA07-0180 First Bank@RTTCModIPlanningIDraftCOAs.doc
, 12
Planning Department
63. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking 101 light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not
adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
64. All downspouts shall be internalized.
65. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. Provide a minimum five-foot wide planter 10 be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
c. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: one
inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for
final planting inspection".
d. A note on Ihe plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an
agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection".
e. One copy of the approved grading plan.
f. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
h. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
i. Shrubs to screen the drive through shall be maintained at 30-36 inches in height.
j. Vines shall be planted at metal trellises on building and at drive-aisle canopy
supports in landscape planter.
k. Specifi~tions shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be
required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being
pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two (2) hours without loss of
pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-
head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with
the approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/owner shall contact the
Planning Department to schedule inspections.
66. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Departmenl before starting the screen.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-Q180 First Bank@RTTC Mod\Planning\Draft COAs.doc
13
Group utilities together in order to reduce inlrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like
an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on
plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
67. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange".
68. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals
shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using f1lJorescent yellow paint applied
over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as
closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
Public Works Department
69. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
c. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
70. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
71. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
72. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Building and Safety Department
73. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
74. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review.
75. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
76. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-G180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft COAs.doc
14
77. A pre-construCtion meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the' start of the
building construction.
Fire Prevention Bureau
78. The developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention
Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire
service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention
Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and
minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground
submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on site hydrants. The plans
must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued. These plans will be
for the lateral coming inlo the building for the fire sprinkler riser since the on site water
system is existing from the main site plan development (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and
National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1).
79. All locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle
access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall
of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed
for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet ( CFC sec 902).
80. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three
sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention
Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit.
81. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets
of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel.
Community Services Department
82. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction and
demolition debris.
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-G180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft COAs.doc
15
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY
THIS PERMIT
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-G180 First Sank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft COAs.doc
16
Planning Department
83. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical
equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final
inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of
building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the
project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered
mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning.
84. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
85. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one
year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the
bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
86. Each parking space .reserved for the handicapped shall be idenlified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with
disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000."
87. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
three square feet in size.
88. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be
installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
89. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
Public Works Department
90. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in theWQMP
have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for
immediate implementation.
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglDraft COAs.doc
17
91. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
92. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
Fire Prevention Bureau
93. Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such
a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property.
Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial buildings shall
have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6)
inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers
on both the front and rear doors (CFC 901.4.4).
94. Based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall
install a fire sprinkler system (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9).
95. Based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the
developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters
Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation (CFC Article 10).
96. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet
in height and be located to the right side ofthe fire riser sprinkler room (CFC 902.4).
97. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submitto the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painling
and or signs.
98. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWGformat
must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be
acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval.
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0180 First Bank@RTTCModIPlanningIDraftCOAs.doc
18
ATTACHMENT NO.5
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-G180 First Bank@RTTC ModlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc
10
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental:
Case Planner:
Place of Hearing:
Date of Hearing:
Time of Hearing:
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING
COMMISSION to consider the matter described below:
Planning Application No. PA07-0180
Joseph Jaworski, First Bank
Northeast corner of Winchester and Nicolas Roads
A Major Modification to construct a 4,034 square foot First Bank Building with drive through
on Pad L at Rancho Temecula Town Center
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Ihe proposed project is
exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Determination will be issued in
compliance with CEQA Section 15162
Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters, Associate Planners
City of Temecula. Council Chambers
,43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
November 7, 2007
6:00 p.m.
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be
heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to,
the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department,
43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Questions concerning the
project may be addressed to the case planner at the City ofTemecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400.
I !
/ I.
'\ / i I
\ If
" \. I .'
",~-,-- ( :
, '#cor:;'--- I .. (
------~+__~~o .----------..0
-'-
>J5
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0180 First Sank@RTTC ModIPlanningINOPH-PC.doc