Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout050708 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 I ADA Title II] li AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE MAY 7, 2008 - 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 2008 - CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Guerriero Roll Call: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total off 5 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is athree-minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of March 19, 2008 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 Planning Application Number PA08-0032. a Maior Modification to Promenade Mall mansion to construct a pedestrian bridge between Macy's and the West Parking Structure RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PA08-0032, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO CONSTRUCT A PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CONNECTING MACY'S TO THE WEST PARKING STRUCTURE AT THE PROMENADE MALL LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD (APN 910-130-072) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBERS PA07-0082 AND PA07-0342, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY APPLICATION TO ALLOW THE TEMECULA VALLEY ELKS LODGE NO. 2801 TO CONDUCT MEETINGS WITH SERVED ALCOHOL FOR MEMBERS AND INVITED GUESTS IN AN EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED AT 28061 DIAZ ROAD (APN 921-040-006) 4 Planning Application Number PA07-0337, a Maior Modification to modify three building entrances, add a trash enclosure, and reconfigure the site to add parking for a Kaiser medical facility RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PA07-0337, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO MODIFY THREE BUILDING ENTRANCES, ADD A TRASH ENCLOSURE, AND EXPAND THE PARKING LOT TO ACCOMMODATE ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR A KAISER MEDICAL FACILITY LOCATED AT 27309 MADISON AVENUE (APNS 910-282-012 AND 910-272-007) 5 Planning Application Number PA07-0265, a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop complex RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PA07-0265, A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE TEMECULA STAGE STOP COMPLEX LOCATED AT 28464 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET (APN 922-023- 022) 6 Planning Application Numbers PA07-0239. PA07-0240 and PA08-0021 a Development Plan, Certificate of Historic Appropriateness and Sign Program for the Vail Ranch Historic Headquarters RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION. NUMBERS PA07-0239 AND PA07-0240, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CERTIFICATE OF HISTORIC APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE HISTORIC VAIL RANCH HEADQUARTERS COMPLEX PROPOSING RE-USE OF SIX HISTORIC STRUCTURES TOTALING 13,390 SQUARE FEET AND 13,738 SQUARE FEET OF HISTORICALLY APPROPRIATE NEW CONSTRUCTION FOR RETAIL, OFFICE, RESTAURANT AND MUSEUM DISPLAY USES ON FOUR ACRES WITHIN THE VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN ZONED HISTORIC COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT 32115-32125 TEMECULA PARKWAY (APN 960-010-044) 6.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PA08-0021, A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE HISTORIC VAIL RANCH HEADQUARTERS COMPLEX LOCATED AT 32115-32125 TEMECULA PARKWAY (APN 960010-044) ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Wednesday, May 21, 2008, 6:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 19, 2008 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE . Commissioner Harter led the audience in the Flag salute ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guen'iero, Harter, and Telesio Absent: None PUBLIC COMMENTS Referencing the Mills Act, Mr. Otto Baron, Temecula, relayed his dismay with the City and its destruction of historic buildings in Old Town. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 1 Minutes 1.1 Approve the Minutes of February 20, 2006 2 Director's Hearing Case Update 2.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for January 2008 MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exceation of Commissioner Guerriero who abstained on Item No. 1.1. COMMISSION BUSINESS 3 Request for Direction from Planning Commission regarding Zoning for Public Charter Schools as requested by Julian Charter School Junior Planner Lowrey provided a PowerPoint presentation, highlighting the following: • Definition of Public Charter Schools • Current Zoning • General Plan • Anarysis • Conclusion R:\MinutesPC\031908 In response to the Planning Commission's queries, Junior Planner Lowrey responded: • There are three charter schools within the City of Temecula • River Springs Charter School was granted approval from the Riverside County Board of Education which was initially associated with Eagle's Peak Charter School (now separated) Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that the Planning Commission is being asked to ensure consistency between the uses of charter schools versus public/private schools. Junior Planner Lowrey noted that the proposed Eagles Peak would be located on property zoned Service Commercial. River Springs is located in a Light Industrial zone, and Vallejo a Residential zone. Junior Planner Lowrey advised that the schools are operating under a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) which was approved by the Riverside County Board of Education. Junior Planner Lowrey noted that initiation of the Development Code Amendment will provide a separate use entitled "Schools, Public Charter (kindergarten through 12`n grade), so that Charter Schools are defined, delineated and consistent with its present use in the Public Institutional Zone under "Schools, Public (elementary, junior high, and high school)" in order to alleviate ambiguity regarding zoning for Public Charter Schools. Assistant City Attomey Curley stated that this item would not be a public hearing; that the Commission is being requested to provide generalized guidance and impressions of land use changes; and relayed that the Commission is not being asked to make any land use changes or binding administrative record that would indicate a detailed process with respect to any land use changes. Speaking on behalf of the Jillian Charter School, Executive Director of Julian Charter Schools Cauzza, clarified the following for the Planning Commission: • Eagles Peak Charter School would be sponsored by Julian Union High School District; that Julian Charter School is sponsored by Julian Union Elementary School District; and that River Springs Charter School is sponsored by the Riverside County Office of Education • As of 2006, charters schools were directed to comply with local building codes • Sixty five percent of charters schools start in churches • She would be hopeful that the Planning Commission consider the proposed facility • Public schools receive its funding from the State and private schools receive its funding from private individuals • Students currently attending Julian Charter School come from Temecula Valley, Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos, Escondido, Bonsall, Menifee, Lake Elsinore, and home- schooling; noting that students would not need an infra-district transfer • Charter schools offer personalized learning for students that would not receive it from a traditional public school; advising that Temecula Valley would be a centralized region to serve the surrounding cities; noting that Julian Charter School would be in compliance with all State Laws Mr. Dave Gallaher, representing Temecula Valley School District, relayed that although the Temecula Valley School District would not be in opposition to Julian Charter School, the school R:\MinutesPC\031908 district relayed its opposition to a Development Code Amendment that would expand zoning for Public Charter Schools. In response to Commissioner Telesio's query, Mr. Gallaher noted the fact that Julian Charter School has a large amount of enrollment which would show its need by local and surrounding communities. For Commissioner Harter, Mr. Gallaher noted that Temecula Valley has not rejected any charter schools that have approached them, but did advise that one charter school disbanded. Mr. Larry Markham, representing Julian Charter School, relayed the following: • Julian Charter School is not here to discuss its location • The request before the Planning Commission would be whether or not to modify the Development Code to allow charter schools the same privileges as private schools • The operational aspect of charter schools or where the students come from would not be the issue before the Planning Commission • The question before the Planning Commission would be whether or not the Planning Commission would support staffs recommendation • Riverside County Code does not make a distinction between public or private schools • The request to amend the City's Development Code would help put other charter schools already established in the City into compliance • Julian Charter School would be in full agreement with all imposed Conditions of Approval Adding clarification to what staff is recommending, Assistant City Attorney Curley reiterated that the Planning Commission's position would be to determine whether or not the Development Code be amended to provide separate uses entitled "Schools, Public Charter" in order to remain consistent with its present use. For Commissioner Harter, Junior Planner Lowrey stated that the Development Code treats colleges and universities differently than public and private schools. Relaying that her daughter is a student of Julian Charter School, Ms. Amanda Grillo, Fallbrook, spoke highly of Julian Charter School and noted its positive aspects. Advising that Temecula Valley School District was approached by Julian Charter School for its support, Ms. Sue Miller Hurst, Temecula, relayed support for the school and its request to amend the City's Development Code; and noted that Julian Charter School offers special education. Mr. Peter Minegar, Temecula, stated that although his kids have had success at Temecula Valley School District, he did understand the importance and need for this type of education. Mr. Tom Fenton, Fallbrook, relayed his full support of this type of education program. Mr. Brian Frunk, Murrieta, representing M.S.S. Properties, relayed his support of the requested amendment to the City's Development Code to accommodate charter schools. Ms. Elysia Luke, Sun City, informed of her daughter's success with Julian Charter School. R:\MinutesPC\031908 Adding clarification, Assistant City Attorney Curley stated that the Planning Commission would be at a public policy level, not a site specific level, not an applicant right issue; the Planning Commission is being asked to recommend a legislative action; that the proponent is requesting that the Planning Commission find a need to revise the zoning laws and recommend to the City Council that the City undertake the zoning law changes that would provide a separate use entitled "Schools, Public Charter" (kindergarten through 12`" grade) in order to be consistent with its present use. Not having done research, Assistant City Attomey Curley stated that he is not aware of a non- Temecula Valley School District school being considered a "private school". With respect to Land Use issues, Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed the following: • The City needs to explore the relationships between the different types of schools • Expressed concern with displacing opportunities for employment and transitioning over to lower intensity non-employment producers • Queried if the Development Code be amended to reflect where schools should be located • Queried on whether or not he City impose a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for schools the City would have jurisdiction over • Would be of the opinion that Industrial Zones would not be an appropriate location for a school as well as the Highway Tourist Zone Concurring with Commissioner Chiniaeffs comments, Commissioner Harter noted that although he would be a proponent of charter schools in general, he did relay his concern with the amount of schools popping up. Commissioner Carey concurred with the comments made by Commissioner Chiniaeff and Harter. Noting that the current zoning should be reviewed and amended, Chairperson Telesio noted the following: He would be of the opinion that the impacts of a charter school versus a regular school would not differ There would appear to be a market for charter schools and its beneficial affect upon the community Commissioner Chiniaeff reminded the Commission that the City does not have jurisdiction over the Temecula Valley School District. After much discussion, the Planning Commission recommended the following to the City Council for consideration. All schools be reviewed and be conditioned in the same manner (with the exception of TVSD) schools under a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) The City explore the placement of schools and its relationship to surrounding uses A CEQA analysis be imposed At this time, the Planning Commission took a five minute break. R:1MinulesPC\031908 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS New Items 4 Planning Application No. PA06-0337, for the Old Town Visioning proiect, which provides goals and recommendations to address community concerns regarding the vision for future development in Old Town and suggests a comprehensive revision to the Old Town Specific Plan to implement these goals and recommendations By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Senior Planner Fisk highlighted on the following aspects of staffs report: • Location • Project Description • Goals o Historic Core o Streets o Building Heights o Architecture o Murrieta Creek Walk o Infrastructure o Residential Neighborhoods o Parking o Economic Development o North Area of Old Town (vicinity of Moreno Road) With respect to parking, Principal Planner Richardson noted that one of the recommendations was to resurvey parking from the February 2007. The parking as resurveyed in December 2007 prior to Christmas which indicated that the parking demand was the same or less as the February 2007 survey. Principal Planner Richardson also noted that this item was reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board with the consensus to move staffs recommendation forward. For the Planning Commission, Senior Planner Fisk noted that the future civic center parking structure will be free to the public. At this time, the public hearing was opened. By way of overheads, Mr. AI Rattan, Temecula, commended staff for their efforts in the visioning project; relayed his dismay with the exclusion of Pujol Street as part of the visioning project (Historic Core); stated that more consideration would be needed with respect to south of arches; stated that there will be a lack of parking spaces (north of Main Street) at build-out; and relayed his disappointment with the architect and his inexperience with California and a downtown plan. Mr. Walt Allen, Temecula, thanked Assistant City Manager Johnson and staff for their efforts with the proposed visioning project; relayed his support of the project but did express concern with Recommendation 2: Streets should not be an either/or goal but rather aboth/and goal; relayed his concern with the Recommendation: Future development should a) orient building activity to the street, b) create a clear street edge, and c) preserve existing and reclaim vacated alleys where possible; advising that staffs recommendation would not be realistic, Mr. Ed Dool, Temecula also thanked staff for their efforts with respect to the Old Town Visioning project, but did express concern with the unbalanced parking surveys conducted by the City; and encouraged that a shuttle service for Old Town be considered to handle future growth. R:\MinutesPC\031908 At this time, the public hearing was closed For the Planning Commission, Assistant City Manager Johnson relayed that the Planning Commission is being requested to recommend that the City Council make an amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) to implement the recommended goals; stated that the goals are a result of the six workshops raised by residents, business owners, and development community; that an amendment to the OTSP will take a year to complete; that the goals would provide general guidance as well as the creation to form-based codes that will address the relationship between building facades and the public realm. Requesting clarification of what the Planning Commission is being asked to recommend, Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed that it would be difficult to recommend that the City Council consider an amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan, per staffs goals, when form-based codes have not yet been created; noting that it would be his opinion that having the form-based goals developed first would give an understanding of its implementation process and how it would affect a change to the OTSP. Understanding Commissioner Chiniaeffs concern, Assistant City Manager Johnson agreed that form-based codes would have to be developed first in order to implement staffs goals. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Principal Planner Richardson advised that staff thoroughly reviewed the existing OTSP with respect to what could be buiR based on square footages of land in the specific plan which equates to 4-million square feet; noting that the preferred scenario would equate to 2.5-million square feet; relaying that the high intensity scenario would be lower than the development intensity then what could be built under the existing speck plan. As per Keyser-Marston, Assistant City Manager Johnson stated that in order to ensure that Old Town is viable and functional, 50% of new development would need to be residential placing it any place throughout Old Town; noting that residential would be a downtown residential, rather than a traditional residential; relayed that the intent would be to have more residential on the west side of the creek as welt as a strong residential element throughout the east side of the creek. With respect to parking, Assistant City Manager Johnson noted that the Master Plan Parking study will identify parcels that would need to be acquired by the City early-on for service parking for the short term and structured parking for long term. Principal Planner Richardson added that parking surveys be conducted on a yearly basis to determine the utilization. To alleviate concerns of creating an amendment to the OTSP without having developed form- based codes and acquisition of parking parcels, Assistant City Manager advised that more research will we undertaken as well as additional workshops will be held; and added that a work shop with respect to creating form-based codes can be conducted. Concurring with Commissioner Chiniaeffs concerns and comments, Commissioner Guerriero encouraged the idea of implementing a shuttle service to serve in Old Town. Commissioner Guerriero also concurred with the Old Town Local Review Board's suggestion of the City purchasing property with apark-like setting to place its historic buildings. R:\MinutesPC\031908 Relaying that there will be a problem with parking if the City does not acquire parking parcels for the future, Commissioner Carey would be in full support of a trolley and/or shuttle bus for Old Town. For the Planning Commission, Assistant City Manager Johnson relayed that the City will be operating a free trolley system in the near future that will service Temecula residents. Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed that he would not be prepared to make a recommendation to the City Council without seeing how staffs goals will be implemented. In an effort to clarify, Principal Planner Richardson relayed that the recommendation will create a new public review process holding workshops that will cover building masses, a parking management study, and design guidelines. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff recommended to the City Council that staff move forward to seek an amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) to see how staffs goals can be implemented. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Assistant City Attorney Curly briefly updated the Commission with respect to SB343 Act. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director of Planning Ubnoske informed the Planning Commission of the upcoming State of the City. ADJOURNMENT At 8:58 pm, Chairman Telesio formally adjourned to Aaril 2. 2008 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. John Telesio Chairman Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R:1MinutesPC\031908 ITEM NO.2 STAFF REPORT -PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2008 PREPARED BY: Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters, Associate Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA08-0032, a Major Modification to SUMMARY: construct a pedestrian bridge connecting Macy's to the West Parking Structure at the Promenade Mall CEQA: Notice of Determination Consistent with Previous EIR and Section 15162 Addendum BACKGROUND SUMMARY On February 21, 2007 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06- 0293, aDevelopment Plan to expand the Promenade Mall by 125,950 square feet with an outdoor Irfe-style main street shopping center wnsistent with square footage allowed in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. This application also included a Conditional Use Permit to construct two parking structures. At the time of approval, the elevations and other plan details were mostly conceptual. The applicant explained that a pedestrian bridge to connect the second story of the West Parking Structure to the Macy's West store would be provided; subject to staff review and approval. On February 6, 2008, Forest City submitted a Major Modification application to construct a pedestrian bridge at the Promenade Mall to connect the second level of the West Parking Structure to the second level of the Macy's store. The Macy's storefront would require modifications to replace the existing storefront display window with the new entrance. The proposed bridge would bean open air bridge. On April 8, 2008, the Infrastructure and Beautification Committee reviewed the proposed bridge design and recommended additional enhancements. These recommendations included providing either landscaping along the sides of the bridge to soften its appearance or some architectural detailing. On April 22, 2008, the Infrastructure and Beautycation Committee reviewed the revised bridge design which included architectural enhancements. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed. ANALYSIS The proposed Major Modification to the approved Promenade Mall expansion is to construct an open-air pedestrian bridge to connect the second -level of the West Parking Structure to the second level of the Macy's department store. The bridge will be located internally to the site and will have limited visibility from the Ring Road. The Macy's store currently exists and the West Parking Structure is currently under construction. The bridge will be constructed of concrete and will be painted to be compatible with the West Parking Structure and Macy's. The bridge has been designed to include three colors (bone white, gourmet honey and western red), and architectural enhancements including reveals, texture, and score lines to provide for shadowing and interest. Modifications are required to the Macy's storefront to accommodate the bridge connection. The existing display window will be converted to glass entry doors. The existing metal canopy at the first level entrance will be removed and relocated to the new second floor entrance at the bridge. No additional retail square footage will be constructed as part of this modification; therefore, no additional parking spaces are required with the bridge construction. The bridge is considered an Accessory Structure to the parking structure and will provide for an additional pedestrian entrance to the Macy's store. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of public hearing was published in the Californian on April 26, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is consistent with the previously adopted Environmental Impact Report and Addendum and no further environmental review is required. A Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA Section 15162. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA08-0032, Promenade Macy's Bridge subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent wdh the General Plan land use policies for Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan and the Retail Core designation in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including retail, professional office, and service-oriented businesses, as typical uses in the Community Commercial designation. The Land Use Element of fhe General Plan and Design Guidelines of the Specific Plan require that proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed pedestrian bridge to support the commercial use is compatible with the surrounding commercial buildings currently located (or under construction) on the site. The proposed bridge construction is consistent with the original approvals for the Promenade Mall expansion (PA06-0293). The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The proposed bridge constmction is consistent with the original approvals for the Promenade Mall expansion (PA06-0293). ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing AERIAL MAP o ,ss ~o cco eeo N Feet TMs rrepvres rtetla A' Ve CaY d Temaola CaoprapNC Mfamebon SYMam. TIp map b tlaeretlfr0rri base tlde pto®Cetl Dy IM RNmYtle Cautly AnaNOh Ceperarnnl mti Qis Tmnsparbtian art IaM MaiapemwC AgacY of Rlwrptle Carty. Tier CdY dTerimla mamm nowafrSly wlepm rtapdMDliry for me HGrmelOrl cdlt9nBG M INS mB0. ~d09k INerrM00'I fegeaRlbEOn tY.f mep eie abiw ro uptlda erp nCtlptalaR Tba C.xp ,pNClydgmaEtln SYetem arW Nw mueaa eterdtl be pumbtl fo M mml cvrem IKmmatlon. ms neple rot M mp'va arveda R'GI51Rm6erMrcMap PrgstlalparcNSwArmm City of Temecula PA08-0032 PLAN REDUCTIONS W O b r m v m ~o o c ~m m m vim, N m 0 Z m r D z 00 v m r r m n 0 z Ce7 v m ao p _ m ~ gm ~Q m~ d a ~' ~ m z 0 ~o ~ y~ ~ ~a _< ~v i ~ r o f ~ ~~ { t r vO N W m ~ ~ ~ ~ r I ~ j n Y i ~ e! ~ 68Rglf11J YIfg3113C _-___ '_ ~ ~ Y ?. , F . ~ 3 pp ill~e~~ 2 O ~ pp ~~il ' 32J111~f1U1S ~JMMkNd 1S3M _-- _ __ -- _ ~'~ °o V7 30 VN3WOild ifl(103W31 -_ _ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ g ~~ €F s 3F~ ~j ~ ~S 1 SY£ v YA ~4 ~ ~ i i" F' x QK C'R ~` ~ lsb ' §x G G fls~~3a" p - 'j . gg ~ ~+ ~ £F+ F . ! . U yg Y ~; ksx ~ u. C e ~iY. Z . ' .* %J 1 r' W g II S 3 ~ A ~' ' x W ~ _~ eyF~?ka x 6 ~ a $ispap ' 2 S 1 1 \"~ .y±~ ~ y ~ P 3 a 3x # xs 8 . a'. z a F a ~tC x ! .~kJk~ 3 Saa. • 3 € U !o Si e ~ 8 ~ V S : + y 1 ... s ~ . ~ [t ¢s t x ~a g g A ~! !i ~ t8 F ! ! tt <'~F ~a ,aT6i F ~a p 3 8 3a31tt ^` a L ' x°a y ~ 4.Y ~ h ~ I -. \ + P .33ffS _ ~ ~as a 9; a` ~a,s .•y of d 8i ~l~assfr3a~s3 d;~ a, ~. ,' • ~.Ix dt3 ~=fib.. d4bSt4 ~xtL'A~! !!d!z es.b? S y Le iflkk.kk~~k ~p^C ; 9 l- s .~ L_. y, 1 a ! ez i~ .Y at "! W p WQ~ ~t Qo ` Q ~ ~ ~''~ $t z s; : O a" Q Q~ ON1 ~ N W pg p ~~~%~ W a W O W U m} v tg €@$~~A g y ~ ~ ~ f g~ $! si ~ awg _ V ~ 9 s §a E ~ D' w U v W m W ~e g o~$ a i F _ rz W x 0 g~ 3 $ ax_ N e k~["P " N ~ o s O v a W g ~ g _ ~ w m F" } Q ~ ~ "s S E fi n E' gd b !( {1t E i E A !!.~! W NSF t WWtl1 'die;p 2 Y~tN x::: a ls,e, 5 .... ; wa aw. uaa+mvrn amore aawn„an.imm~: 3~ists~k ~~¢f~.~~~ aaruamus~Naava~ _ ::._-- ~!~>; ~ •- $~4~"'t 3QtlN3W021d Vl(1~3W31 __- y° t ®` ~ ~~ V ~ - F~3f ~m ~z O Q m _ i V 5 ~ - f ~ ~ m ~_~. ~ ~~' n Z ~ \ -e _ 'g m x i ~' ~~ _ s~ a .- -~ a :;.Z Z S o __f~ --o m ~;' ~ Z W V-l--`- W Q J ~ _ x W W ~ N x 5 E ~ - Ry O . E iQ~ .... .. t W m: ~ x~9 d e ' p -' .~... ~: W LL t ~ ~~. - N S~' ' _~ Z ... 0 F U~ W~ 2' 2 ~ O O ~---.......__~ .. ~ ~ a J W a• _r- w: L~€ __ -._. __ .. ~ Z' O 4 tW9 '. -.- l' o ~: n ~P O ' ~ N ~'~ W y. 41 ."s ZO .: .. (. F- U . W ___.__. W _ -~ Z O w` rn :. W O V m a ~. ~ ~.v, ~ y..ffi ~-...a.,R,„..~„s ;~iilei~ O " ~s - ~e~ 3Hf1L'7fINLS`JMNtltld1S3h1 _ _ _~ s ~1 ~y ~ ~y e~ a 30tlN3W0ad t/l(1~3W31 - :__ _ `. ~ a # ~ a~ ~ a Y~~ s ~ ! MNWlRfJ VY1;13f3y . __ _-___ -~-~ i 3 , ~ ~t ~,' ~ ~~~ 3211llJl1NLS ~fJIHiltld 1S3M 3~!S,s:a eg~ g ___ _ ~8~6'' 30VN3WOildtllf1~3W31 _-__~.-~_ °'`~ ~~ ~. ~~~4 ~m T a m ;~ 1 --.. :, - ~~- -- - a J ~ J W ~ W _- ~ m g m o- - - ~ m3 o w f~ : i I~ _ O r~ _~ -I Oe Y Z. 11 F ey 0 V -_ U. W= s~ W% N. ~. y: W o u m vumonr~ H E nr~r~ - 3°JWilB S.I~VW - 3Hf11~(la1S `JNIMMd 1S3M 30VN3WOild V1f103W31 0 0 w it ; 1 I ; i >_ i el li ! 'a 14 ~ 311 ~ ~ "i i 9i s! ii ~ilisi~l :ill il:l! 1111 iljlljl II ! , e ! ,ell 111'1 ! ~! II! 1 e,l , 1 114 °19' 11 T1! (~ a°a I I e II(1 11.1 Ie. Ili !I it 1 e• 1 ~ ~ e ! =Ik dh•'I E• 1 ~ 11 , 1, , 111111 111.11i1~1}I~Ii~~l1!!ii!1:'ee411 jliuillall! 91!1'11• ,!si! 1, II ! i; all~t le II, N al't1 a 111 111:•" na, ! Ib1 ! ae I /,1 I ICI n• 1 II.• 1 11 1e Il0lott!jM1j elt~ Ie1111 ~99'i~'e991!i4'tll '~11~ ia11111~91i11'1 3llllj, 1 1 Ile~~qq~ ({~ 9. Ole~9n1144g9!lik, 11131: ee111e111~L~(1j1 Iltl.e9:dlt'lllll 9 1111 Illp!11 9I!11ti9GittIIlllle4u11I!1@ael l!lillli~i~l9!!°~~?lllilTTf{I!lillallli~9L9!li9~119194i Il~op°oi 9a ooedb ~edidC pO Ome eenli ileeb 88 ea b= Aedl f ~I'~~8eame9l®;'~®90o ms YIYI i It!.i BI t 'Iii° jl I ~ii!9 ~; r~~n 1~II!1iL~ 3 , , 3,, !a I ;jiO~r j ~ ~I ,I;~ 11 ' Its,! , r 1 ~(~ ,~i ~r~ 'I p ~nl 111 i~~' ~° °P ~'' III I ~ '~pI 1!,~'!°~i;,a i ud ti I~ l 1 ~I li!I Vii, !~ ! Iri ~ !li iil•Il9 /!~ ~I~ ll ~'II IIIIJ'!I •' j ~ ~ 1 IIn~ t ~ ~ l'~ n1 e. !~ ~,~ ~ t°l ~s 1a 3 ' i1"I 1 5 9i 9e I°'Il. le 131.m. 11 III .. . `y ~~'llll !' ~ ~~ i'IiU~ III 5i~~ ~ ~~ l 1911! ~I af'll ~.i G !II~ 1 I!i ill;! ,dill jD! II .9i a Ilii ~~;o- i; II I~~t;~ly 01 ~ah I ~.nral 9~,1~; I 19~i99~~ In 1111! ~ I o i G I I '. ~~ Slyl'i iii , 161 1 1 ii !a`. 9 3 ~ 1 ° i'd1e ill :II [ ! 1 ~110L~1~1i 111! ~l i 1' Inli 1 I~ ir,19e in ~ 91919 , ~+~ i! li ~ it I! i' lulu ~ e it !ii ~'! I! . ....... . ..... a le,~ ~~ l1~ o~ li ~1° ~a~ ~~ ~ : x;11 it 1! 41~ ~,,,~ i ;l ~ ~~'i iq ~ i ~~ •~di ~9 ~~ q lull I~l! ii91 ~(: if' 1~9 ~~~ In ~ 11'~I ~i ~ I 1.1+6 aoll elU 9111!1 I.I ldl tll t.8 I P.91t1 ei At 1 . ... mmm umu avC• °'°~•a~u*wma~m~x -• amm ry¢ntm/rh uvcoaco-wnnmm wsKb.4>la {~ e!~ _ ! _, ~~~ vkaaoirn~ -3~JOIii85J.~tlW- ~~ °"' ~~ c~ ~f llle~~ Y ~~ ~~~ 313fI1~f1H1S ~JNINWd1S3M 0 o-~~" ~~'~~' ~ (~ sa ~ vl 30tlfd3WOad tl1f1~3W31 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w E~ e a . e-- ~ r ~I 4 Bgt~~ tl~ P t- z~ w 2- J R as 31 rn QIY F V,_ _ 0 ~4' w I O u 0 6 :2 ~;~j i i11 c ;i. Y l>: I ;:, 01: R} 3`~n~'~3 '~3 vi';I E?§ ° illlllllllllllllillillll(iIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!: °.. a~> a ~~~~~~ i~ ~ ~ Iii i I~ i (~I~ ~i ~ ~ I~ (~ ~~ . ~~s '.:~I:~Q~ I~~I 1V_ d@f un nnn nn nn nnnnn uruninuiunu nlii ii, iic istlli°. s ~ ~ p°~ 1 ~ f ~~= ~ '_ ~~• ... 9fldeq z%x' Nm~~mp ~ pµ xw. WItl ~ I f I ~~W~ ~q~ K~'~ 0~~ O '~& ~ n 8jB __ •x x:u^ v~ :x XRta ~ ~ -~°R~®®® ~V "Y 15C W i • _ _ 7 1 T ~. ....._.. ® 1.~ ;~.1._....... SS ~ ~ ~ _~__ ti' _I 0 ~ 1 „ ~ fin{ •~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~... .3 ~1 ~ -~ _ W'. ¢~ 1."r, g99 pps~v _ x _ ~ _ -ifs m~i w yy 1BE1~ Q ~ ~ ~' {~,q x xx I!IY'6 x EF11~;~~e?1 ~' 7 k~ x?< I ._ _ ® - `° ,~xx,' -acr w ~ 9 ~:+ ~ -.1~1g~~iA.~~F.FQP~1J ® ax~_Ix~a/K}a-u~ -. ~°1i~~®re A9 '- I-- --I 111 r+aµ xx®®__ I I I I 1 I ~ ` O iS o n h ® o ~ ® __, i ! O _ i m o 1~~: Q f>! ®0 _I ~~ ulti o© ,,._ 1 ,ri .. 1 0O Is u~ 11 o©_©_ s E ~~f l 1 ° G°: 'i'YE ° (e S3' S ~ ~ ~ ii ~ unn II nninn II n I ninnununnnn ~ I i II II nnniunnnuG I) I VIII I a. I I ` ' I g 3 i~I ¢ 9~ ~ g3f 'S Sa• f-" Y fi~ ~ 4~~3 : 'i ~ >.. WW~ -" u.s EIRE IIII I I II 111111 1 I IIillll 1111 lllll11111 1 111 11111111111111. i* 1 EG1EG 4 _ - i ~ l i - \ ---- o ` ? ,1 , .- _ a- : . , E ~ - ~ if i ~ [ `a 3' ' < S 1 i v \ E \~ \ I I • e a . •I f W y, is ~ i \ _ . ~ c ~ , _ ~ _.._. _ ......_ _ __ __ o , . _ c _ , e EE < . ti ° ~ \ ~ : \ !~ ~ ~ -_ 3~ ~9 ' .e I 1 l\ ~i S ~.--: T 1 I 1 : I: I ' } S T :~ ~ •:: = 1. _Fi ... ...... t' I g f 1 .......~._.. .._ , __ 35 Eii : <E f s f( i ~ ~ _ #E~ E}I . t s f, -- :: ~ --- " --- 0 _ .. _. _ .. m Y # f ~ ~ Z m O_. ___-_ ..._ .. _ _ ....... ......... ... .-- 1 P ~ ss -- -r- PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0032, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO CONSTRUCT A PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CONNECTING MACY'S TO THE WEST PARKING STRUCTURE AT TtiE PROMENADE MALL LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD (APN 910-420- 006) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 21, 2007 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0293 a Development Plan to expand the Promenade Mall by 125,950 square feet with an outdoor life-style main street shopping center. The application also included a Conditional Use Permit to construct two parking structures. B. On February 6, 2008 Forest City Development ,filed Planning Application No. PA08-0032 Major Modification Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. On April 8, 2008 and April 22, 2008 the Infrastructure Beautification Committee reviewed the project. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 7, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. F. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08-0032 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City; As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan and the Retail Core designation in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including retail, professional office, and service-oriented businesses, as typical uses in the Community Commercial designation. The Land Use Element of the General Plan and Design Guidelines of the Specific Plan require that proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed pedestrian bridge tb support the commercial uses is compatible with the surrounding commercial buildings currently located (or under construction) on the site. The proposed bridge construction is consistent with the original approvals for the Promenade Mall expansion (PA06-0293). B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended fo ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The proposed bridge construction is consistent with the original approvals for the Promenade Mall expansion (PA06-0293). Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Major Modification: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed- project is consistent with the previously adopted Environmental Impact Report and Addendum and no further environmental review is required. A Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA Section 15162. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA08-0032, Macy's Pedestrian Bridge, a Major Modification to construct a pedestrian bridge connecting Macy's to the West Parking Structure at the Promenade Mall, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7th day of May 2008 John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of May 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PAOS-0032 Project Description: A Major Modification to the West Parking Structure and Macy's Storefront at the Promenade Mall to construct a pedestrian bridge connecting from the second level of the West Parking Structure to the second level of the Macy's store Assessor's Parcel No.: 91020-005, 007, and 008 MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Approval Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Per Development Agreement Per Development Agreement Per Development Agreement May 7, 2008 Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount ofSixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the Ciry to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. Ifwithin said 48-hour period the applicanUdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval forthe project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original ' signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements 3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 4. This approval shall be used within iwo years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall became null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 5. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 7. The applicant shall paint athree-foot by three-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 8. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans and PA07- 0154, Modification Application shall apply to this application except as modified herein. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 9. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans and PA07- 0154, Modification Application, shall apply to this application except as modified herein. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 10. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans and PA07- 0154, Modification Application, shall apply to this application except as modified herein. FIRE PREVENTION 11. The Fire Department has no comments on this case. Please refer back to the original Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293. POLICE DEPARTMENT 12. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans and PA07- 0154, Modification Application, shall apply to this application except as modified herein. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 13. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans and PA07- 0154, Modification Application, shall apply to this application except as modified herein. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp1878831.doc Notice of Public Hearing Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Planning Application No. PA08-0032 Forest City Development 40820 Winchester Rd (Macy's storefront at Promenade Mall) A Major Modification to the west parking structure and Macy's storefront at the Promenade Mall to construct a pedestrian bridge connecting from the second level of the west parking structure to the second level of the Macy's store. Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is consistent with the previously adopted Environmental Impact Report and Addendum and no further environmental review is required. A Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA Section 15162. Case Planner: Matt Peters/Cheryl Kitzerow, Associate Planners Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 Date of Hearing: May 7, 2008 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or priorto, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. i ~ 3 s ~ PFOe-0032 I C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Dowment Converterltemp\67883t.doc ITEM NO. 3 STAFF REPORT -PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2008 PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Junior Planner PROJECT Planning Application Numbers PA07-0082 and PA07-0342, a Minor SUMMARY: Conditional Use Permit and Public Convenience or Necessity Application to allow the Temecula Valley Elks Lodge No. 2801 to wnduct meetings and to serve alcohol for members and invited guests in an existing building located at 28061 Diaz Road RECOMMENDATION: Recommend Approval with Conditions CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15301 Class 1 Existing Facilities PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Industrial Park Designation: Zoning Designation: Light Industrial Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Light Industrial North: Light Industrial South: Light Industrial East: Diaz Road/Open Space West: Light Industrial Existing Lot Area: Five Acres Total Floor Area/Ratio: N/A Landscape Area/Coverage: N/A Parking Required/Provided: 106 Paul Gonzalez, Temecula Valley Elks Min/Max Allowable or Required N/A N/A N/A 68 (required) BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Planning Application PA07-0082 is a request by the Temecula Valley Elks Lodge No. 2801 to conduct club meetings and to allow for alcohol (Type 51, Club License) and food service to members and invited guests. Meetings will take place in an existing 30,000 square foot building located at 28061 Diaz Road. The zoning and General Plan designations for this location are Light Industrial and Industrial Park. Pursuant to Section 17.08.030 of the City of Temecula Development Code, membership clubs, organizations, and lodges are permitted in Light Industrial zones upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The Temecula Valley Elks are currently leasing 3,000 square feet of the existing building. From this space, 2,250 square feet will be used as a general meeting and social area. The remaining 750 square feet will be comprised of restrooms, storage rooms and a future kitchen and office. According to the Statement of Operations submitted by the applicant, the facility will be operational Monday, Tuesday, Friday and Saturday from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. These hours occur outside those of the Groeniger Corporation; the business occupying the remainder of the building. Groeniger's regular business hours are conducted from 7 a.m. until 5 p.m. The applicant has also included in the Statement of Operations that approximately 132 occupants will be present during meetings. This occupancy load has been reviewed by the Fire Department and the Building and Safety Department to ensure compliance with all appropriate safety regulations. Both departments have concluded the facility can accommodate the anticipated number of occupants. The increased occupancy load during operating hours will affect the demand for parking. The City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.24.040) requires union halls, lodges, and clubs to be parked at a ratio of one space per 33 square feet of gross assembly area. Based on this formula, the Elks Lodge requires 68 parking spaces. The proposed site contains 106 existing parking spaces. This Minor Conditional Use Permit will allow the consumption of alcoholic beverages by the Temecula Valley Elks. The applicant is applying for a Type 51 Club License which will limit alcohol sales and consumption to only club members and invited guests while on site. Per the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), three on-sale alcoholic licenses are permitted within Census Track 0432.15. However, the current total of licensed establishments equals 65. A list of these establishments has been attached for your convienience. Consequently, staff has been informed by ABC that a Public Convenience or Necessity application must be filed in conjunction with the Minor Conditional Use Permit. Staff does not deem an additional alcohol serving establishment excessive because according to ABC, no other Type 51 Licenses exist in the Census Tract. It must also be noted that a religious institution is located approximately 270 feet from the proposed Elks Lodge. Per the City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.10.020.6.3), businesses selling alcoholic beverages and requiring a Conditional Permit shall not be located within 500 feet from any religious institution, school, or public park. However, the code also indicates that this provision shall not apply when the alcohol-selling business and the church, school or park are both located within commercial or industrial zones. The proposed Temecula Valley Elks Lodge and religious institution are both located within the same Light Industrial zone. This Minor Conditional Use Permit will also permit food to be served to Elks members and invited guests. The Elks have stated that food will arrive at the facility pre-packaged and that no formal cooking will take place on the site. In addition, the applicant will be conditioned to comply with all regulations stipulated by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 26, 2008 and mailed to the property owners wthin the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilties). It has been determined that this project qual~es for the Existing Facilities exemption under CEQA Section 15301, Class 1. The Temecula Valley Elks Lodge will be located in an existing building with negligible expansion of an existing use. FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.04.010.E) The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed conditional use request to establish a location where the Temecula Valley Elks Lodge No. 2801 can conduct meetings and serve alcohol is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element contained in the Genera! Plan. The proposed use is also consistent with the City of Temecula Development Code in that it is an appropriate use for the Light Industrial zoning district per Section 17.08.030 and provides the required parking per Section 17.24.040. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The condftional use will not adversely affect the surrounding properties or uses. It should be noted that the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) have a post located near the proposed Temecula Valley Elks Lodge and that VFW engages in activities similar to those of the Elks. The main entrance to a religious institution is located approximately 270 feet from the proposed Elks Lodge. Staff has verified that this will not pose a problem since both the proposed Elks Lodge and religious institution are located within the same industrial zone. Per the City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.10.020.8.3), businesses selling alcoholic beverages and requiring a Conditional Use Permit are perrnitted to be located within 500 feet of a religious institution if both the alcohol selling establishment and religious institution are within the same commercial or industrial zone. The site for this proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The exjsting building at the site adequately provides all improvements including walls, fences, loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and all other features as required in the Development Code and by the Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with uses in the immediate area. In addition, the Development Code (Section 17.24.040) requires 68 packing spaces to satisfy the parking requirements. The current site exceeds this requirement by providing 106 marked spaces. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The proposed Conditional Use Permit has been reviewed by Building and Safety, Fire, Public Works, Community Services and Police. These departments have determined the Conditions of Approval will ensure that the health, safety, and welfare of the community is maintained. The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The project has been completely reviewed, as a whole, in reference to all applicable codes and ordinances before the Planning Commission. Public Convenience or Necessity (Code Section 17.10.020.B.5) Whether or not the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Public Convenience or Necessity application allowing the Temecula Valley Elks Lodge No. 2801 to serve alcohol is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element contained in the General Plan. The proposed use is also consistent with the City of Temecula Development Code in that it is an appropriate use for the Light Industrial zoning distcct per Section 17.08.030 and provides the required parking per Section 17.24.040. Whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent land uses. As conditioned, the conditional use will not adversely affect the surrounding properties and the applicant is not requesting to alter the extecor of the building to allow for their proposed use. It should be noted that the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFVI~ have a post located near the proposed Temecula Valley Elks Lodge and that the VFW engages in activities similar to those of the Elks. In addition, all adjacent land uses are appropcate for a Light IndusMal zoning disMct and no residential uses are in close proximity. The main entrance to a religious institution is located approximately 270 feet from the proposed Elks Lodge. Staff has verged that this will not pose a problem since both the proposed Elks Lodge and religious institution are located within the same industrial zone. Per the City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.10.020.8.3), businesses selling alcoholic beverages and requiring a Conditional Use Permit are permitted to be located within 500 feet of a religious institution if both the alcohol selling establishment and religious institution are within the same commercial or industrial zone. Whether or not the proposed use will have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses. As previously mentioned, the main entrance to a religious institution is located approximately 270 feet from the proposed Elks Lodge. Staff has verified that this will not pose a problem since both the proposed Elks Lodge and religious institution are located within the same industrial zone. Per the City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.10.020.8.3), businesses selling alcoholic beverages and requiring a Conditional Use Permit are permitted to 6e located within 500 feet of a religious institution if both the alcohol selling establishment and religious institution are within the same commercial or indusMal zone. Whether or not the proposed use will result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity. According to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, no other club organizations seeking the sale of alcohol are contained within Census Tract 0432.15. For this reason, approval of the Public Convenience or Necessity application will not result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity to the proposed Elks Lodge. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing APR-17-2009 09:33 ABC RIVERSIDE DISTRICT 951 781 0531 P.002 04-17.06. CENSUS TRACTINFOMATtON BY CENSUS TRACTWRHADDRESS PAGE1 07:14 AM ~ WHERE COUNTY IS 93•RIVERSIDE AND CENSUS TRACT IS 0432.15 . C011W6 L1C011cc Liocnaee Tract 7yp®c ~, Staivs ~ Num Premicec 0432'.15 at 47~ ACT ~ 2d8882 REYNOSOAIFONSO ~ 27485 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 9259Q-2602 0432.15 20 ACT 450858 ~ THORNTONWINERY 32575 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD, TEMECVLA CA 92591.4935 Oo32.i6 a7 ~ PEND - ~a621t9~ S~MYUNANDOCKJAKYMMFAMILVTRUSf1LiTE0MARCH. 28.2003 43660 GLEN MEADOWS R0, TEMECULA CA 92590.4011 0432.15 47 ACT 370471 CROSSCPIDCUJ7 ' 43860 GLEN MEADOWS RD, TEMECULA CA 92590.491 t 0432.15 41 ~~ ACT 39504 HASStNdGLORIA ' ' 26676 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. TEMECUTA CA 92590 0432.15 21 RBSj 112879 STATERBROSMAAKETS . ' ~ 27475 JEFFERSON AVE,IEMECUTA CA 92590 0432.15 47 ACi 335738 SOLANO MIRNN4M 27180 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590 -~ 0432.15 ~ 47 ACi • 173345 MEXICOCHIQUROINC ' ~ 41841 MORENO RD, TEMECULA GA 92590 0432.15 ~47 ~ ACT ~ t97340 MANDER9CIiEID00NlLLDL 28551 RANCHO CAIJFORNIA R0, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.15 21 ~ PEND 465845 ONE MIWON LUCKY STARS INC 27911 JEFFERSON AVE. TEMECULA CA 92590.8874 0492.1$ 21 ACT 414409 KIM JAMES HWAN 27911 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590=6614 0432.15 20 ACT 388306 BPWESTCOASTPRODUCiSLLC , ~ 41555 WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.15 21 '~ ACT 895032 MAUUKJNVESTMENfSINC - 28d10 OLO TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECULA CA 92590.1818 0432.15 47 ~ ACT 212820 TEXAS ULS CORPORATK)N 28495 OlD TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.15. 41 ACT• 444108 HAROHATSSPORT5GRILLINC 27713 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECUtA CA 92590 0432,16 21 ACT 481483 RR&SONS WC 27316 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590.5800 0432.15• 41 ACT 446272 PENFOLOSCAFEINC 28250 OLD TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECUIJI CA 92590.1812 0432.15 a1 ACi d07819 BMWMANAGEMENTINC 27717 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.1 b 48 ACi x22542 J G ENTERTAINMENT INC ' 27'725 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432:15 47 •, ACT 495159 NGUYENT1M1~iYTRIEU 27484 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590.2601 .~ 0432.15 47 ~,. ACT 246d02 ~ STADIUM PO7A INC • 27314 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.15 d1 ACT. 248000 HSIAOSHUCHUNG 27371 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590 APR-17-2008 09:33 04-17-06 07:14 AM Census ~ Tract Types ABC RIVERSIDE DISTRICT ~ 951 781 0531 P.003 'CENSUS7RACTINFOMATIDNBYCENSUSTRACfWRNADORESS PAGE2 WHERE COUNTY IS 33•RIVERSIOE AND CENSUS TRACT IS 0432.15 License LloenBSe Status; Num Premises 0432,15 d0 ACT 348581 WfLLIN1ASONGIL'OWOECENDARIO 27911 JEFFERSON AVE. TEMECULA GA 92590 0432.15 41 ACT 301689 USaNALU)WIEECHUREET . 27451 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 82590 0432.15 47 ACT 438005 TEMECULAWINGSLLC ~~ ~ 27345 JEFFERSON AVE, 7EMECULA CA 92590 0632.15 21 .. ACT 45227d GEAGIS IVAN ELYAS 26322 OLD TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECULA CA 92590•t6/d 0432.15 21 ACT 425408 ROBUNGRICFIARDANTHONYJR 29780 OLO TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.15 41 47. ~ ACT ~ 449149 CHAVEZ RAFAEL ' - ~ 28000 OLD TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECUTA CA 92590.2811 6432.15 '41 ACT 260938 THESINGMICHAELAIAN . 28638 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. TEMECUTA CA 92590 0432.1 S 47 ACT ' 438025 DELAO ELYIA MARIA 27645 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 82590 ' 0432.15 47 ~ ACT 263628 PARAGONSTEAIOIOUSERESTAURAM"84C 27600JEPFERSONAVE, TEMEWLA CA 92590 0432.15 41 ACT 317674 DAFfERNFREDL 28495 OlD TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECUTA CA 92580 0432.15 20 ACT; ~ ~ 288795 ELECTRENDINC 29115 OLD TOWN FRONT ST; TEMECUTA CA 82590 . 0432.15' 48 PEND ~ 465047 ETSPLACER4C 27423 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590.2602 0432.15 48 ACT 305223 ~ 7ARIPHE$TED 27423 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA.CA 92590.2802 Od32.1S 47 R85~ 42464d KUHAMISAVANNARAGEB 27326 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECUTA CA 92580 0432.15 4/ ACT 276800 OEPHIUPPISMICHAELD 27309 JEFFERSON AVE, 7EMECULA CA 92590 0432. i5 47 ACT 308530 TEMECULASTMAPEOE 28721 OIDTOWN FRONT ST, TEMECULA CA 92590 '~ 0432.15 20' ~. ~ ACT. 434216 REGIONAL EIO'RES5fA1(SEFMCESINC 27570 JEFfEFISON AVE, TEMECULA CA 82590 0432.15 47 ACT 458383 CNCPUMACORPORATION ' 2864b OlD TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECUTA CA 82590.1819 0432.15 20 ACT 463517 TEMECULAFUELSCORPORATK)N .28903 RAt~HO CALIFORNIA RD, TEMECUTA CA 92590-1867 0432.15 41 ~ ACT 341625 TCBINC ' 29105 OLDTOWN FRONT ST, TEMECUTA CA 92590 0432,15 47~ ~ ACT 945317 . NGUYENTHUAN THI 27533 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 82590 oa32.ib a2 ACT 456319 DOOLEDWAROLEE 28484 OLO TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECULA CA 92590 APR-17-2008 0933 ABC RIVERSIDE DISTRICT 951 781 0531 P.004 04-17-08 CENSUSTRACT INFOMATION BY CENSUS TRACT WRH ADDRESS~• PAGE3 07:14 AM WHERE COUNTY 1333-RIVERSIDE AND CENSUSTRACT IS 0432.15 Cencus ~ LIc0I1E9 I.ICCn600 Traet Typ®a Status'; Num PramiB@s 0432.15 41 ACT 407283 TASTE OF INDIATEMECULABJC ' . ~ ~ 27715 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.15 41 ACT d34774 DUCOUIOMBIERELEANORTIDANA 28660.OLO TOWN FR0NT ST. TEMECUlA CA 82590 0432.15 47 ACT .' a54858. ~ANGELOPOUIOSNiCKJAMES • 27405 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 82590.2802 0432.15 41 .ACT : 424399 OLD TOWNENIERPRISESU.C 41815 3RD S7, TEMECULA CA 92590 Od32.15 41 ACT 447805 OVIZHECTORMANUEL 27911 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECUTA CA 92590 0432.15 40 , ACT , 416877 FERREEDENNISKELLY 28950 OLD TOWN FRONT ST, TEMEGULA CA 92590 0432.55 41 ACT 385877 CHH4PSHIP ' ~ 28Y34 JEFFERSON AVE. TEMECULA CA 92590 -0432.15 ~ at ~ PEND 465898 103•fiGERRYEUGENE . ~ ~ d1971 MAIN ST, TEMECUTA CA 82590 0432.15 41 ACf ' 429030 DELGADO ANN d197/ MAIN ST, TEMECULA CA 82590 0432.15 62 ACT ; 403712 VFW POST 4089 ' 28075 OIAZ R0, 7EMECUUI CA 92590.. Oa32.15 41 ACT 398731 NGUYENOAVEVAN ' ~ 27523 & 27525 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECVIA CA 92590 0432.75 aS ', ACT 405643 VINCE$SPAGHETIIEXPRESSINC 28145 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.15 20 ACT 472862 STRINGERSU.C 42210 ZEVO DR, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.15 d7 ACT 404834 bI.DTOWNDiNWGLLC ' 28699 OLD TOWN FAONT ST, TEMECULA CA 92590.27d1 0432.45 41 PEND ~ 485815 ARAWONINC 28720 JEFFERSON AVE. TEMECULA CA 92590.6607 ' 0432.15 41 ACT' 445473 CHUNHAICCH9V 28]20 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 92590.8807 0432.15 dl ACP 457435 SUNSETJA71C0 27470 COMMERCE CENTER OR, TEMECULA CA 925904522 ' 0432.15 42' ACT 4'12430 STELLAR CELLARLLC 28636 OLD TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.15 41 ACT 444072 ZHAOCHANGHU • 27725 JEFFERSON AVE, 7EMEGULA CA 92590 0d32.15 20 ,. ACT 420554 PPLAIARODRIGUEZGARLOSEDWAR0 28522 Ol0 TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECULA CA 92590 0432.75 " 42 PEND 420558 PAIMARODRIGUEZCARLOSEDWARD ' 28522 OLD TOWN FRONT ST, TEMECULA CA 82590 0432.15 47 ACT 417727 PENFOLDLADDL 42072 5TH ST, 7EMECULA CA 82590 APR-17-2008 09:33 ABC RIVERSIDE DISTRICT 951 781 0531 P.005 06.17-08 CENSUS TRACT INFOMATION BY CENSUSTRACi WITH ADDRESS PAGE 4 07:14 AM WHERE COUNTY lS 33-RIVERSIDE AND CENSUS TRACT IS 0432.15 Cenwa. Lieense Lioensae YraM .' Types 9tatusi Num premises 0432.15 ~~ 47 ACT ~ a59328 - FIESCHERFRANKREMMCK . 42051 MAIN ST, TEMECULA CA 92590.2789 0432.15 41 ACT aas677 901EPoAENfERPRLSES 28410 OLO TOWN FRONT' ST, TEMECULA CA 92590.1818 0432.15 2042 ACT 450368 TEMECUTA VALLEY CHEESE COMPANY 42072 5TH ST,7EMECULA CA 92590.2728 0432.15 ~ 42 ~PENDj 451914 SMOKERSLANDINC • 25120 JEFFERSON AVE. TEMECULA CA 92590.8807. 0432.15 - 20 ACT I 451989 ZCAUCTIOMINC 41743 ENTERPRISE CIR N, TEMECULA CA 92590.5626 0432.15 41 ACT' 452150 PAI.UMSOSR15fORAMELLC 41925 5TH ST, TEMECULA CA 92590.2709 0432.1 S ~ 41 ACf 460322 BATIAKIDOU VASSILIKI ' ~ ~ ~ 27326 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECUUI CA 82590.5604 0432:15 51 ~ PEND ~ 461454 BPOE7EMECULAVAILEVLODGE2801 28061 DIAZ R0, TEMECULA CA 925903434 . 0432.15 41 PETA . . a6a579. SBITEMECULALLC 27.170 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA CA 82590.2688 0432.15 47~ ACT' 440501 AGUILARANAB(ATR¢ ' 26770 JEFFERSON AVE, MURRIE7A CA 92582 TOTAL P.005 VICINITY MAP O F,yrF ~p~ s`O~ a ~pP ¢ ~[S O~ ~ ~ `M~ Fc,~ ~ Sp\ys+P ' ~r ~sr 'c o yfa o~ y 'pa 9 ep po of eor~oG ~F ^po9 cy~ 9~ 00 9yS PPp. PyO~ ~F, hyFr h1 Off, , 9 OPT 2 ~ ~'P J~ US pSt ~~~1 P~S~" Y~ S E n r `pG ~`(' 0 m~ A o ~p0 ORtE2 c O PT' G Off, p 8 r 9 ~ ,te Sd ~~ J"~ERS PPRK OR 0 ~l ~ ?O Pr PA07-0082 Ti ~ SINGLE OAK OR OM~GNLANOOR RPNGHOOa'1fORN\P~ ~ < n ~ u, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F o ~o yc .` : P ~m °a ~ o ytia4p ~'' c ~ ~ ~ ~~ yoFe ~ ~\ ~ 4 PSP St ~~ :~ •, „L $yy ~' y . ~ :4 sf =y ~q~ y. 4F . o t~P ,0 .~ •... ~~ . s o = ~•~ 4 r U r~ ~. ~ ` tyti N ~, .ft ~ 0 1A0 aB0 960 ``py t.NO t.9M Fee! PLAN REDUCTIONS snot/ ' / /a/ri SH 18 A37'IVA Y'I(IJ9W8d ~`Ul~ 't _ .~ z .. .FMp vo,++.w+ra~n«.+...+.rnm~ ~ ., wry. t i ~ J ry ~' ~ 1 k / H d~ ~~~ . ~ L~ , i ' ^ ~~ ~ ~ ' ~. a. W , ,. y ~ I . I r ~ <i~". w 7 i ' µ ~ J `" .. i d .- ~,.,. '. iS~ z : 1,"z . ~1"..k', r` ~-~4~#~i4 ~k~.,i?(c ~'.t ~'''.._ .~ 1 ~ ~ °~ 11. 4+ . G .. d z v ..' n ~: 1 x~ ppp ~' k', F x'CcF T a ~ek ~~ i ~ ~ atL~~/ ~,,,aj•~eL A~i..at A+r >s 1 u? ... u, LAY R i f ~ u ~.}..~u "~' A y ~ ax~n• ~+( ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~Y t~~ a I i~O,dvi ~ k5 f. ~'h . .' a i r ~i ~~zt~ ~,yJ; E vka' ti ~~ ~ R a,"~ ~" 1 I t. { ~• .: c, ~, ~ / t , + ~ °""' SSA ro,.3~"s'. ~ ~ ' ~ a.{,4~ ~i .c ~+''~' ~ - Go t ' I ~ / X1 '] ~ 5. ~1 4 fl ' zrl ''~''• 'i ~'~Ftt lc ~z~~' ,. 1 n vv its +~ .. ~ :a. -el.o - 3.. ~a ~..v ~- ~ 0 ~ :' z '' z f~ . - tz~-e ,I r.a ~ ~ ~ ~ o` ~~' z x,~~~ ' y f , O ~ ~ it ` v ~ 1 7 `~~ 1F ~ ' ,~ o \ sa'a'g~ ~~W fi! f ,, ~:~ Ivy \ ry (1 F _ O \ ~awvau BM•19 u~ \\ ~ Y ~ 1 ~ ~w H - h qBX~ `~, ~ ~T~a • ~ ~ I ~ \ U Neil.. ~ \ sa~La~oyaoaansaaolta~oao ` ~ '~ `~ ,, ~n , . ~ v ©~.8 © i. > A! 1 -~-M-. I s l~ ~. .^ syel ~ ~- F4..y, a-+. _ .5 I. dh wa szaw-xa3 ~w -,, j: x `' ^` , ; /i~`~~ff// o i`` h ~ tySF".. v sIY ~ .A \ ~ a n ~.1 ~kzlvs~~"iV f>a b~~~ K i -{r K{v,. y . 4 t4 T_ i~ • + Y ! 1 ~ I vk ~ P$I' ; $ ~ z l Yly uY..\ t{ ~,Y~l. ~ s 4~+ lr ~ §!v ~ I t i..i tr,4 r ... '.. .. .. .. ~. z~i'.'!3.'d':~z ~.J..w,~]r: ~' ',tai. una: ees .. ~S~ ~~~a i~~ .., 1. I _._F ~ .. ~. ,~, ,~ _- _'a~ ~, ~, ~ E i 1 av o~ a ~ ...~~-~___~ t y„ ,mot 1 ~ 1ii~B:l ~. ti~ '~~~+.(.1 .~ ~ t" .. ~. a+ ! 1 l~ 1 ~ ~y >~: ~ 'P~rf.~ ~ y y~ i I~ i ; ~ry. ~. ~ ~y a..,. ~ to ~ "~ii' ti1 '~ ~ ~"` ~ 1-~' t~ f fir' ~ w <u ~' e~ ;y F 9 jg r ~ Nip '~ ~ r i ~ j. i ,.; 7 1 ,4 ~.. ~n~~>,,:.~ , Pvt., .... - ldlS~ d4T 1 ~dFi~' it t r'.. ~~I IIJ~11,~ i~i~ili~~j ~''~s'~~ ~liliif~,a l~III~' - ,.... ,~ L€ F4 E I !f• ^; `ii b+; 7, ~- I ~ T - ---- I Ei PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBERS PA07-0082 AND PA07-0342, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY APPLICATION TO ALLOW THE TEMECULA VALLEY ELKS LODGE NO. 2801 TO CONDUCT MEETINGS AND TO SERVE ALCOHOL FOR MEMBERS AND INVITED GUESTS IN AN EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED AT 28061 DIAZ ROAD (APN 921-040-006) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On March 12, 2007 Paul Gonzalez (Temecula Valley Elks) ,filed Planning Application No. PA07-0082 a Conditional Use Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 7, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07-0082 subject to and based upon the firidings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.04.010.E) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City; The proposed conditional use request to establish a location where the Temecula Valley Elks Lodge No. 2801 can conduct meetings and serve alcohol is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element contained in the General Plan. The proposed use is also consistent with the City of Temecula Development Code in that it is an appropriate use for the Light Industrial zoning district per Section 17.08.030 and provides the required parking per Section 17.24.040. B. The proposed conditional use is compatable with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and strucutres and the proposed condtional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures; The conditional use will not adversely affect the surrounding properties or uses. It should be noted that the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) have a post located near the proposed Temecula Valley Elks Lodge and that the VFW engages in activities similar to those of the Temecula Valley Elks. The main entrance to a religious institution is located approximately 270 feet from the proposed Elks Lodge. Staff has verified that this will not pose a problem since both the proposed Elks Lodge and religious institution are located within the same industrial zone. Per the City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.10.020.8.3), businesses selling alcoholic beverages and requiring a Conditional Use Permit are permitted to be located within 500 feet of a religious institution if both the alcohol selling establishment and religious institution are within the same commercial or industrial zone. C. The site for this proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; The existing building at the site adequately provides all improvements including walls, fences, loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and all other features as required in the Development Code,and by the Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with uses in the immediate area. In addition, the Development Code requires 68 parking spaces to satisfy the parking requirements. The current site exceeds this requirement by providing 106 marked spaces. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The proposed Conditional Use Permit has been reviewed by Building and Safety, Fire, Public Works, Community Services and Police. These departments have determined the Conditions of Approval will ensure that the health, safety, and welfare of the community is maintained. E. The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The project has been completely reviewed, as a whole, in reference. to all applicable codes and ordinances before the Planning Commission. Public Convenience or Necessity (Code Section 17.10.020.8.5) A. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; The proposed Public Convenience or Necessity application allowing the Temecula Valley Elks Lodge No. 2801 to serve alcohol is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element contained in the General Plan. The proposed use is also consistent with the City of Temecula Development Code in that it is an appropriate use for the Light Industrial zoning district per Section 17.08.030 and provides the required parking per Section 17.24.040. B. The proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent land uses; As conditioned, the conditional use will not adversely affect the surrounding properties and the applicant is not requesting to alter the exterior of the building to allow for their proposed use. It should be noted that the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VEIN have a post located near the proposed Temecula Valley Elks Lodge and that the VFW engages in activities similar to those of the Elks. In addition, all adjacent land uses are appropriate for a Light Industrial zoning district and no residential uses are in close proximity. The main entrance to a religious institution is located approximately 270 feet from the proposed Elks Lodge. Staff has verified that this will not pose a problem since both the proposed Elks Lodge and religious institution are located within the same industrial zone. Per the City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.10.020.8.3), businesses selling alcoholic beverages and requiring a Conditional Use Permit are permitted to be located within 500 feet of a religious institution if both the alcohol selling establishment and religious institution are within the same commercial or industrial zone. C. The proposed use will have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses; As previously mentioned, the main entrance to a religious institution is located approximately 270 feet from the proposed Elks Lodge. Staff has verified that this will not pose a problem since both the proposed Elks Lodge and religious institution are located within the same industrial zone. Per the City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.10.020.8.3), businesses selling alcoholic beverages and requiring a Conditional Use Permit are permitted to be located within 500 feet of a religious institution if both the alcohol selling establishment and religious institution are within the same commercial or industrial zone. D. The proposed use will result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity; According to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, no other club organizations seeking the sale of alcohol are contained within Census Tract 0432.15. For this reason, approval of the Public Convenience or Necessity application will not result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity to the proposed Elks Lodge. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Minor Conditional Use Permit: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities). According to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines), the key consideration in determining whether or not a project qualifies for the °Existing Facilities" exemption is to determine if the project involves negligible or no. expansion of an existing use. The Temecula Valley Elks is a membership club and membership clubs are a permitted use within a Light Industrial zone upon the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit. In addition, the use will take place in amulti-purpose area of the building and is considered to be negligible expansion. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA07-0082, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the Temecula Valley Elks Lodge No. 2801 to conduct meetings with served alcohol for members and invited guests in an existing building located at 28061 Diaz Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7"' day of May 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the Tin day of May 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA07-0082 Project Description: Planning Application Numbers PA07-0082 and PA07-0342, a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Public Convenience or Necessity Application to allow the Temecula Valley Elks Lodge No. 2801 to conduct meetings and to serve alcohol (Type 51) for members and invited guests in an existing building located at 28061 Diaz Road Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-040-006 MSHCP Category: Industrial DIF Category: Industrial TUMF Category: Industrial Approval Date: May 7, 2008 Expiration Date: May 7, 2010 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicanUdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount ofSixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicantldeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval forthe projectgranted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resuking, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof; advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the . City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. The permittee shall obtain City approval forany modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; othervuise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. A Sign Program may be required. 8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 9. landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 10. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. 11. Parking for the project shall be shared across the site, including parking spaces in all lots that are a part of the project. If the project involves multiple lots, the applicant shall submdto the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use Agreement, which provides for cross-lot access and parking across all lots. 12. Regular hours of operation shall be between 6:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., Monday, Tuesday, Friday, and Saturday each week. 13. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated December 27, 2007, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. 14. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 15. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions ofApproval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in-lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violatiorthereon. 16. Prior to an employee selling alcohol from this facility, the alcohol licensee or employer for the facility shall ensure that the employee has received Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (L.E.A.D.) training from the Califomia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. 17. An 8.5" x 11" (or larger) sign listing local transportation service providers and corresponding telephone numbers shall be posted at a conspicuous location within the building. Information to assist in the compilation of this sign may be obtained through the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce (951-676-5090). 18. The applicant shall comply with all regulations stipulated by the Califomia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. 19. The applicant must obtain all appropriate permits before performing any alteration to the interior or exterior of the structure. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 20. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- streetparking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owners expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." 21. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. 22. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. 23. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with priorto occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 24. The applicant shall comply with the letter attached sent by the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health dated April 16, 2008. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Requirements 25. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 Califomia Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, Califomia Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 26. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 forthe regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and otheroutdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of--way. 27. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 28. Show all building setbacks. 29. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 30. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 31. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. At Plan Review Submittal 32. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. 33. Provide precise grading plan at plarrcheck submittal to check accessibility for personswith disabilities. Prior to Permit Issuance 34. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements 35. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), Califomia Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 36. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection (CFC Appendix Chapter 1). Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 37. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. A notification device will be required to be added to the suite (City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section G, 903.4.4). Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 38. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC 506). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements 39. Applicant has applied for a Type 51 License (Club). A Type 51 license authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only, for consumption on the premises where sold (no off-sale privileges). Food Service is not required. Minors are allowed on the premises and TYPE 58, (Catering Authorization -Form ABC-218) through the Riverside District Office of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Authorizes Type 47, 48, 51, 52, 57 and 78 licensees, and catering businesses that qualify under Section 24045.12 to sell beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption at conventions, sporting events, trade exhibits, picnics, social gatherings or similar events. Type 47, 48 and 57 licensees may cater alcoholic beverages at any ABC-approved location in the State. Type 51 and 52 licensees may only cater alcoholic beverages at their licenses premises. All licensees wishing to cater alcoholic beverages must obtain prior written authorization from the Police Department of each event. At all approved events, the licensee may exercise only those privileges authorized by the licensee's license and shall comply with all provisions of the ABC Act pertaining to the conduct of on-sale premises and violation of those provisions may be grounds for suspension or revocation of the licensee's license or permit, or both, as though the violation occurred on the licensed premises (Section 23399 and Rule 60.5 Califomia Code of Regulations). 40. Applicant will comply with Ordinance 97-07, 0.14.010 Temecula Municipal Code series. 41. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: (a) valid Califomia drivers license; (b) valid California identification card; (c) valid military identification card (activelreservelretired/dependent); (d) valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, and County or City agency. 42. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with 25660 Business and Profession Code, (B8P) which includes the following requirements: (a) name of person; (b) date of birth; (c) physical description; (d) photograph; (e) curcently valid (not expired). 43. Licensees may not sell, give, or deliver alcohol (by the drink or by the package) between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the same day. No person may knowingly purchase alcohol between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. (Section 25631 B8P Code). Licensees may not permit patrons or employees to consume alcohol between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the same day (even if someone bought the drinks before 2:00 a.m. Section 25632 B&P). Some ABC licenses have special conditions (restrictions) as to hours of sale that are stricter that the law. Those licenses are marked "Conditional" (23805 B&P). 44. Police officers, sheriffs deputies and ABC investigators are sworn law enforcement officers (peace officers) with powers of arrest. Whether in plainclothes or uniform, peace officers have the legal right to visit and inspect any licensed premises at any time during business hours without a search warrant or probable cause. This includes inspecting the bar and back bar, storeroom, office, closed or locked cabinets, safes, kitchen, or any other area within the licensed premises. It is legal and reasonable for licensees to exclude the public from some areas of the premises. However, licensees cannot and must not deny entry to, resist, delay, obstruct, or assault a peace officer (Sections 25616, 25753, and 25755 B&P; 148 and 241 (b) PC). 45. Licensees may not permit their licensed premises to become a disorderly house. A disordery house is a licensed outlet (on or off sale) that: (a) disturbs neighbors with noise, loud music, loitering, littering, vandalism, urination or defecation, graffiti, etc; and/or (b) has many ongoing crimes inside such as drunks, fights, assaults, prostitution narcotics, etc. The licensed premise includes the parking lot (Section 25601 B&P; 316 PC). 46. On-sale licensees who offer entertainment must abide by the following rules: (1) no licensee shall permit any person to perform acts of or acts which simulate; (a) sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality; oral copulation, flagellation or any sexual acts which are prohibited by law, (b) the touching, caressing or fondling on the breast, buttocks, anus or genitals, (c) the displaying of the pubic hair, anus, vulva or genitals; and, (2) Subject to the provisions of subdivision (1) hereof, entertainers whose breasts andlor buttocks are exposed to view shall perform only upon a stage at least 18 inches above the immediate Boor level and removed at least six feet from the nearest patron. No licensee shall permit any person to remain in or upon the licensed premises who exposes to public view any portion of his or her genitals or anus (Rule 143.3 CCR. Also violates sections 311.6 PC if conduct is "obscene," e.g. intercourse, sodomy, masturbation, etc.). 47. Based upon the type of events, there are no requirements for additional police officers to be present. 48. Applicant will ensure no loitering occurs on or adjacent to its premises during hours of operation. 49. Applicantwill ensure sufficient lighting is provided forcustomers during hours of darkness if hours of operation extend into the night. 50. Applicant will be responsible for any cast incurred by the Police Department if additional officers are required because of traffic problems/congestion, public disturbance orwhere the need for police presence is required. ENV HERLTH~ MlA2RIETR Fax:9516006181 Rpr 16 2008 16:38 P. 02 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE • COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH City of Temecula Planning Department c/o Eric Jones PO BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 16 Apri12008 RE: PA07.0082 The Department of Environmental Health (DEB) has received and reviewed the PA07- 0082 for the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to authorize a minor CUP for the operation of the Temecula Valley Elks to conduct meetings and alcohol at 28061 Diaz Road. The structure is one story and totals 30,000 sq ft, The. space leased by the Elks is 3,000 sq ft of the 30,000 sq ft.., under the applicant: Temecula Valley Elks C.odge The planning application gives the APN as 921-040-004. Food vending or restaurant use of the permit shall require food plan check compliance by the County of Riverside DEB. Please calf Bonnie Dierking, Supervising RES et 951.461.0284 within 24 hours of the City's receipt fax of these conditions. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951.600.6180 Sincerely, !~ Gregor Dellenbach, REHS Loe•i EnJbrecweot AgtncY • N9. fins !:?+U Rrnn.oir. l:A 92,.q?,-32fi0 • 1951) 9.ru~>39F2 • 1`AS i'~1.11` 7:1 ~• ::.! • Sftr. !„c:ou Ginnrq 7~41?nm~. Pr, er<idr. CA 92.`dll Lnnd U~re and Woltr Engineering ' EQ. lien 12.i i. iii~:er<ida. CA 9Ls0YJ206 • (9511 955:1996 • PAX •4';i • lti 1 •'~'it • •^,i=i'1 lu;ue~ tins. Gnl Fl..:r. Y.icnnidr.. CA 9.;A71 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: Planning Application No. PA07-0082 Applicant: Paul Gonzalez, Temecula Valley Elks Location: Generally located approximately 1,500 feet north of Rancho Califomia Road at 28061 Diaz Road Proposal: A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the Temecula Valley Elks Lodge No. 2801 to conduct meetings with served alcohol for members and invited guests in an existing building Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be issued in compliance with CEQA (Section 15301, Class 1, Type: Existing Facilities) Case Planner: Eric Jones Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 Date of Hearing: May 7, 2008 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you maybe limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. 8 1E~ \~ :75~~~ ' o p O~ S'~~ gQp `~~ IYNaE eel o~A 4 2 P ~C,05 ~p~ .~ `aVUs ~O" p~Y NAtPS - '* <// g 0~~55 PMI(p~ Y O ~ ~~~ boo ~RA PA07-0082 \P t , o ~~ f\\\/\1 \ SINGlF 44N OP' ~ C I~ a; ~ p r-J o ~ _~F .~..r~.~ L~'~i MICIb LNJF~~JJJ ~..4 ~ gFli -.. _ ~ ar u s °~ ~ s o PCA+`-0 ' N a sw taoo z o ,soo '~ ~ r ~d ~ 5 ITEM NO.4 STAFF REPORT- PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2008 PREPARED BY: Dana Schuma ,Associate Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA07-0337, a Major Modification to an SUMMARY: approved Development Plan to modify three building entrances, add a trash enclosure, and expand the parking lot to accommodate additional parking for a Kaiser medical facility located at 27309 Madison Avenue RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332 Class 32 In-fill Development PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Kaiser Permanente General Plan Service Commercial (SC) Designation: Zoning Designation: Service Commercial (SC) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Existing office building and vacant lot North: Existing businesses South: Santa Gertrudis Creek East: Existing businesses West: US Bank and vacant lot Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Lot Area: N/A N/A Total Floor Area/Ratio: N/A N/A Landscape Area/Coverage: 14,026 sq fU21 % 20% Parking Required/Provided: 130 existing 118 required BACKGROUND SUMMARY The Major Modification was submitted on February 20, 2008. A DRC meeting was held to discuss site design and landscaping. Revised plans were submitted on March 25, 2008. The site plan was slightly modified to address staff comments regarding handicapped accessible parking. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The Major Modification proposes several building and site modifications to accommodate a new Kaiser medical facility. The Kaiser facility will operate from within an existing 23,510 square foot building located at 27309 Madison Avenue. The proposed mod cations include improvements to three of the building entrances, the addition of a trash enclosure, and the expansion of the parking lot to accommodate additional parking spaces on the adjacent vacant lot. Specifically, the proposed building modifications include automating the doors and adding guard rails to the main entrance of the building. The two additional entrances, located on the north and south sides of the building, will be widened to four feet. All materials and colors will match the existing clear anodized storefront assembly and glazing. The addition of one trash enclosure will be located on the west side of the building adjacent to the existing trash enclosure. The enclosure will match the existing materials and colors of the building. The existing parking lot will be reconfigured and expanded into the adjacent vacant lot. The adjacent lot is approximately 1.5 acres. The parking lot expansion will accommodate an additional 57 parking spaces on 0.9 acres of the lot, leaving 0.6 acres of the site undeveloped. The Development Code requires that one space per 200 square feet of building area is provided for medical office uses. Based on this requirement the project requires a total of 118 parking spaces. The total parking provided for the medical building will be 130 spaces including 13 handicapped accessible spaces. The applicant has filed a parcel merger application to merge the two contiguous lots into one legal parcel. Landscaoinp Twenty-three percent (14,157 square feet) of. the existing building site is landscaped. The adjacent vacant site also has 1,648 square feet of existing landscaping within the right-of-way. The modification proposes an additional 12,380 square feet of landscaping within the new parking lot. Overall, 26 percent of the entire site will be landscaped. The proposed landscape plantings have been coordinated with the originally approved plantings. The new landscaping plan will be complimentary to the exisitng building and site design. A mix of trees, shrubs and ground cover will be installed to screen and shade the new parking lot. The area proposed to be undeveloped at this time will be temporarily hydro-seeded. The conceptual landscaping plans indicate a dry non-irrigated hydro-seed mix to be used; however, for purposes of initial growth and dust control, Planning staff has required temporary irrigation to be provided for that area (Condition of Approval No. 18). Access/Circulation The Department of Public Works has analyzed the proposed traffic impact of the project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved City of Temecula General Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. Access to the site will be provided by two access points. The first existing access point is located on the east side of the property off of Madison Avenue. The second access point is proposed to be located on the north side of the property off of Sanborn Avenue. Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 26, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. Section 15332, Class 32 In-Fill Development Projects. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The proposed project is allowed by the General Plan and zoning designation of the Development Code. The project is consistent with all development standards, including setbacks and FAR requirements for the site. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site that is less than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project site is three acres and surrounded by existing development within an established service commercial area. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The property is not known to have any value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species as it has been previously disturbed and partially developed. Additionally, the project site is not recommended for habitat conservation nor does it support or impact any habitat associated with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Program (MSHCP). The project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Service commercial development was anticipated for this project site and the land use was analyzed as part of the General Plan. The project has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed as part of fhe General Plan EIR. The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The utility and public service companies were notified of the proposed project and no new facilities or expansion of existing facilities will 6e necessary as a result of the project. Existing services are available and adequate to service the proposed development. FINDINGS Major Modification, Development Code Section 17.05.010E The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and with the development standards and zoning requirements for project to be constructed within a Service Commercial zoning district. The project meets all applicable design standards required by fhe Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines. The site is property planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and all applicable fire and building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. The overall development, including the site design, circulation, parking, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will 6e constructed and function in a manner-which will protect the public health, safety and general welfare. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing VICINITY MAP o zoo aoo eoo l,zoo Feet TNa map was mma ey pv Cly m ianYUla Geaprapltio hdpmatbn Syalam. Tire meP h Oanved parrs CesB daal Pradirad aYab RNeraWa Cony naaessora DepeNnenl aM IM Trampwlaibn artl land M8lapemBM ApMKy m RNeMWB Cwdy. Tire Ciya/TSmeau aeamas m wanaray a opal MappulmRY/a pre 1. .: ~ Nlamalbn wM.mw an pda map. Dah and MOrmNbn reprmaMad on mu map ere srm}ct W updala aM madlfeatbrt 7ha Woyyltlc IMamatim 6yslam aM Whar aarcea NwM a rluaried la IM moq curard In(armalbn Tlb map la MI W repMl N rpWB. City of Temecula PA07-033 PLAN REDUCTIONS a F ---- ---- ~~ - ~~6--- ---------------- 1 ar`-:max Ss_ -- ~,,:=v.:...~~:_ I ~ -T y1I .~....m ~ ~ ~ r ~f1 5 7~ -~~- F i I pr. I T'~~dl ~ ~~~ i F I ~ 11 I I'll I I ~ e all~~ ~ ~ g:I II I , Y ~II I I ~,~ ~,II ~_ ~ i I~;;- 111 Ili I iii I I ~il I IIn II I,ii I I ~ ii ~,_f I ~;; ~~ I ~ 11 5 ~I I_ I III ~11 (t-I ~, r I%~ I g~ a 6 S € gP iG~ 8s ~~ J 1 - ~''~~~ ~~~ a ~,~ y.. n'~„R. u~ a~ mma ' m0 i I ~ y .' Y R ~a ' J ~ g6 ~ Lqp O y g ~'i5w € € €Y aZ ~W ~'~z gg ~5 so ~a a x W //cry g J fM a ~~Y .3 ~~ e @ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~` ~~ ~ ~ 6 8 8 8 8 Li 2 y 6 b 83 89 82 E 8~9H ,~ t~ a ®, v ~, : a,5 a 8 :_ 6 t g 8 8@866 O Y r ~• Q ,Z~ A ~ Ey pp 9~ 4 n ggggpp,•• € ~ i 6 f A ~ ` FIx€1 ! ~i ,gigy?~ ~~ ~ ba ~~ 9a3 r§ 33 § 6 0~ _ _ $$$ i ! °.` @ ~ ? as aa{{ pp c a qg~p. E ~3 Fa~~ a x ~1 £ e H A~s39 " a ' s _, P"~ i ~ , .at n~tA.n~p sr~rni u+~~~ ~51~NM/M STtntNJ WLLV1aJ]N 'i~!` • a b__ a R4IW NW YNJhAw~MO tAYAlyasa ~wrw yn Goa ~ o .'a. ,~ ~ • (1025 away Hoy 3NI11J311NJtlV 3tlYJSONVI ~ 8103llN~W B®A1 W~V!!j 0/~ u3lH40 0 1 ~ (J J$ i i a dnou~ vaev5vrnv i toy ~tJVa ~aow E~v~ vines ,~. s $ N o a i kE S~ s [5- IIp 'E e~ Si xz rig a 3~ 'c Y' .e ): ~: 9a 2 s~ S~° Q t # g J E (( q ~ L 2 ~~ } { ~ + S Z ' $ ~~aa i g F- t S3~q~~t e ~,It ye ~ ~. r R z ., Z 5 Q ~~,yf CE ~F j S Se E'E 2 fe$~~'it~ 9`, Y 6 - a Q. E ~" 9 ~' 1l 31 M1T. .~i Z t f l , ~ yy w f `~yy~ ~ 45 ~5 t .~a eS8 ~:: cls .-~r<< sass ~~~' g F"s?S,? ~' • s FFF Si ~'- {`p ; F '~~g '3 } i . g iS3; L~ x z? e§ az"g 3 § ~ " a 5 ~ p s = ~ ~ a l w t ~ 9 { ~a y t7 £ p x Q ~ ~ ~ ,3 ?r 3E^ 3 c s n ? 1 S: ~BC ~Y. Y Y 9 s ~ _ 3 1 53 355 ~ . 3 t ~ ~ L ~ ~ °n 3 A 4 t ~ 5 8 e 3 E., 33a 9 ¢ ~ ~ ~, } ~ I sQ' ~ S 2 s 2 ;~ ~g ' S~ ~° ~~ E't3 p '~ 5 ~ ~ `a ~s 3~ .YS 3 „ ~ $ ~ @ F9 ~ :~ $F3 ~? ~I ~ ~ y s E/QHO© ~ ~ ' Oi ® O 3 t 42 S F b 2 a P 4 c ~~ .~~ a :~ h 4 r 9 N € ~~ ~ E ~^ ~ og ~: ~F± _p~ woo ~C I ~$$~ n a ~€ F ~~Sw €~ a~a z N p N _ O ~__ 1 _~.]n_~. FlAfl_~ ~ ~ ~ ~I y ~`ag -~~2Y~t y~ -_. - , , p~~ 1 _ .. .. t -- ~ ~ ~- .., _ _-_ _ _ , _ . o---~ _. - --- --- ~~ r ' v ~ ~ ~ ~ I _ ~ ~~I _ ~ I _ ~ _ ~: - '9 _ ~ % ~~e ~ 1 ~ 1 1~ ~ [' ~t _ __-_ ~~ _ _- _ - QQ ~i Ou- . , , =~ - ~y . .. _,_ , ~, ~ - - -- .. .. z ~ <>-- o- ~ ~ -- - Z w r-- - - --~3:,•R~---- - o Z ~--- --- ~ ~K~. - ~-- M s~ - o _- ~~~ I ___- a- ~~~ f _ =tee ~ ~ - ~ o--- I ~ o--..- o-- ~ ._ r~- o-- y o- - ---; . , -~-...._. ~ 5 ° ` '' i~-°~' v ~ 3 PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0337, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO MODIFY THREE BUILDING ENTRANCES, ADD A TRASH ENCLOSURE, AND EXPAND THE PARKING LOT TO ACCOMMODATE ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR A KAISER MEDICAL FACILITY LOCATED AT 27309 MADISON AVENUE (APNS 910-282-012 AND 910-272-007) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 20, 2005, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA 05-0101, a Development Plan for atwo-story service commercial building. B. On February 20, 2008, Kaiser.Permanente filed Planning Application No. PA07-0337, Major Modification Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 7, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07-0337 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Major Modification, Development Code Section 17.05.010E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and with the development standards and zoning requirements for project to be constructed within a Service Commercial zoning district. The project meets all applicable design standards required by the Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and all applicable fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; The overall development, including the site design, circulation, parking, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner which will protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Major Modification: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32 In-Fill Development Projects). The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; The proposed project is allowed by the General Plan and zoning designation of the Development Code. The project is consistent with all development standards, including setbacks and FAR requirements for the site. 2. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site that is less than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses; The project site is three acres and surrounded by existing development within an established service commercial area. 3. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; The property is not known to have any value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species as it has been previously disturbed and partially developed. Additionally, the project site is not recommended for habitat conservation nor does it support or impact any habitat associated with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Program (MSHCP). 4. The project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; Service commercial development was anticipated for this project site and the land use was analyzed as part of the General Plan. The project has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed as part of the General Plan E/R. 5. The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services; The utility and public service companies were notified of the proposed project and no new facilities or expansion of existing facilities will be necessary as a result of the project. Existing services are available and adequate to service the proposed development. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA07-0337, a Major Modification for a Kaiser medical facility, located at 27309 Madison Avenue, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7th day of May 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. OS- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of May 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA07-0337 Project Description: A Major Modification to an approved Development Plan to modify three building entrances, add a trash enclosure, and expand the parking lot to accommodate additional parking for a Kaiser medical facility located at 27309 Madison Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-282-012 and 910-272-007 MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Commercial Service Commercial N/A May 7, 2008 May 7, 2010 Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicanUdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount ofSixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. Ifwithin said 48-hour period the applicanUdeveloperhas notdelivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 10. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. 11. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. 12. Parking for the project shall be shared across the site, including parking spaces in all lots that are a part of the project. 13. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved the Director of Planning. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 14. A Parcel Merger must be filed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 15. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery isnot anarchaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notifythe property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." Prior to Issuance of Building Pennit 16. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot Tight standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 17. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: One inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection." d. A note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection ° e. One copy of the approved Grading Plan. f. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). h. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. j. Specifications shall indicate that a minimum of lwo landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of iwo hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-Co-head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicanUowner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. k. Precise Grading Plans consistentwith the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. I. All WQMP information and storm water treatment design details shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP and/or storm water treatment design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. 18. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall specify that the hydro-seeded area will be temporarily irrigated. 19. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 20. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas including but not limited to trash enclosures and hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 21. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director orhis/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. 22. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of--ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping file covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 23. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 24. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 25. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square ' inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000 26. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. 27. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. 28. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 29. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated January 8, 2008, a copy ofwhich is attached. 30. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho Califomia Water District's transmittal dated December 19, 2007, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Requirements 31. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the Califomia Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 Califomia Electrical Code; Califomia Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, Califomia Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 32. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site fighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of--way. 33. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 34. Show all building setbacks. 35. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 36. All building and facilities must complywith applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. 37. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 38. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 39. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 40. Commercial and Industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. 41. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 42. At plan submittal, restroom fixtures, number and type, are to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Plumbing Code. 43. At plan submittal, provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. 44. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. 45. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 46. Apre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 47. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 48. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. 49. All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 50. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements 51. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 52. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC, Chapter 5, Section 503.4). 53. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection (CFC Appendix Chapter 1). Prior to issuance of Building Permit 54. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted priorto the issuance of building permit. 55. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 56. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have aminimum ofsix-inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC Chapter 5, Section 505.1 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). 57. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5, Section 506). 58. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Fire Department a Hazardous Material Inventory Statement. A full hazardous materials inventory report and color coded floor plan is required for any building storing or using hazardous materials (CFC Chapter 28 though 44, Appendix Chapter 1 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 59. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous matedals from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 34 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 60. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 61. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flatworkand improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of way. 62. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right of way. 63. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 64. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the projecttoprevent non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite orentering any storm drain system orreceiving water. 65. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be accepted by the City prior to the initial grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and include site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment mechanisms. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 66. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 67. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 68. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 69. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 70. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the CittJs Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. 71. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. 72. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: (a) Planning Department; (b) Department of Public Works. 73. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 74. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 75. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 76. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashiers check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to issuance of Building Permit 77. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flow-line grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00%minimum overA.C. paving. b. Driveway shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. d. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 78. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb and gutter and drive approaches b. Storm drain facilities c. Under grounding of proposed and existing utility distribution lines less than 34 KV 79. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 80. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 81. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WOMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. 82. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 83. Comer property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 84. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 85. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Warks. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE s COMN,,JNITY HEALTH AGIrNCY City of Temecula Planning Department c!o Dana Schuma PO BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 08 January 2008 RE: PA07-0336 ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ JA^! 7 1. ?Iti J8 ~lannfngt?~palfenT The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has received and reviewed the PA07- 0336 for a Minor Modification to an approved Development Plan (PA05-0101) to modify several building entrances and a trash enclosure located at 27309 Madison Avenue. (Related project: PA07-0337). DEH has no objections. The project's APN 910-282-012 is connected to a potable water line and sanitary sewer from an approved purveyor. A water and sewer availability letter shall be required by the City of Temecula at time of building plan submittal to the City. The parking spaces fall under the CUP PA07-0337 we also have no objections. If your have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951.600.6180. Dellenbach, REHS EHS080031 ($136.00) Lacnd EnFo:nement Ayrney • I?0.:'wz ;230. Riverside. (:P. 92502-1250 • 145.} 955 5832 • PA\ 1951( ;+i!M:~; • 4080 Lemon Slreef. 9!'f (`IOCr. Rive!siJe. CA S2b01 LnnJ !(sr. nnJ IVnter Eryineering • P.L. 13ex 1206. R~:c -i:!e.. to 925(72-1206 • 6;li 9si.n450 • (3i~ i95U 95`~-390:i • 4?!f~i Lemon S:r:mf. 2nri i~iorn. R:~icride S;A 425ai December 19, 2007 '•om° Dana Schuma, Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 °oadofD"~`°" Temecula,CA 92589-9033 Stephen d. Corona President wnraa, e. ph.taaer SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY _~'~~~ ~n /~~,-~^ f ~°""P`ad`"` CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- PROJECT NO. PA07-0337 Ralph A.Ovily PARCEL NO.7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23561-1 Bea B. Drahe APN 910-272-007 c:'aD_Bnratan [KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN] John E. IfoaglaM Ati<hxI 2 Mcpiillan To Whom It May Concern: °"~ Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the Men d. Brady Cencrnl AGnagor boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD), and fronts existing 12- Phi11:pLFOrbes inch diameter potable water pipelines within Sanborn Avenue and Madison "y""ntGcnenlALna9err a,:~Anenaalorr«r Avenue. Water service for landsc a ini ation fire rotection or other u ap g p , p rposes 8. p.'B"h^Lenwre would be available upon the design and construction of necessary water service ~~^rE"~^~^^~ connections as well as the completion of financial amarrgements between RCWD Perry R. Louek Di t f Pl i and the property owner. Please note that a se orate water service/meter will be I> rec or o onn ng dertr< n ar,n,t o.r r wired for all landscape irrigation needs of the subject project. y . s r Conhnller Kclli B. fiarcia m mas In addition, water availability is contingent upon the property owner signing an t <~nwry Afid C I C Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights if any to RCWD . a< owett Beat Best&w;«<r,.LF , . Sanitazy sewer service to the subject project would be provided by Eastern Ceaerd Cmtnsel Municipal Water District. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please con*act an Engineering Services Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCI[O CALIFORN[A WATER D[STRICT VV ~ Corey F. Wallace, P.E. Development Engineering Manager Enclosure cc: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor 07lCW~at0020~FEG Rancho California Water District 48195 tVinrhestcr ftond IbsI Ollicc BOr 901'1 Tcmavla;Calirwnia 82589~90IT (9.~iD'L96-6990 FiU(19SI1296-0860 vrvrc.n(alw.nter.mn NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING C:tProgmm Files (x86)Weevia.Com~Document Converterttempt878847.doc Notice of Public Hearing Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Planning Application No. PA07-0337 Kaiser Permanente 27309 Madison Avenue A Major Modification to modify building entrances, add a trash enclosure, and expand the parking lot to accommodate a Kaiser medical facility In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be issued in compliance with CEQA Section 15332, Class 321n-Fill Development Projects Dana Schuma, Associate Planner City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 May 7, 2008 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or priorto, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. C:\Program Files (x86)1Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp\878847.doc ITEM NO. 5 STAFF REPORT- PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2008 PREPARED BY: Dana Schuma, Associate Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA07-0265, a Comprehensive Sign SUMMARY: Program for the Temecula Stage Stop complex located at 28464 Old Town Front Street RECOMMENDATION: Approve with CondiRions CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15311 Class 11 Accessory Structures PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services General Plan Community Commercial Designation: Zoning Designation: Old Town Specific Plan -Tourist Retail Core (TRC) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Temecula Stage Stop Complex North: Existing Retail Buildings South: Existing Retail Buildings East: Public Parking Lot West: Chaparral Building BACKGROUND SUMMARY On November 7, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07- 0176 for a Development Plan to redevelop the Temecula Stage Stop complex, a 0.37 acre site generally located at the northeast corner of Old Town Front.Street and Sixth Street. The project was conditioned that a Comprehensive Sign Program be approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. On September 17, 2007, the applicant submitted an application for a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop complex. A Comprehensive Sign Program application is required, per the requirements of the Development Code, whenever two or more businesses exist in amulti-tenant development. Many signs currently exist on the building; however, the approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program for this complex will ensure that all signs for existing tenants/suites will eventually ceme into conformance with the sign criteria, and that all new signs will be consistent with one another and with the architectural design of the buildings. On November 13, 2007, staff provided the applicant with a DRC comment letter which outlined staffs requested revisions to the Sign Program. Staff continued to work with the applicant via meetings and a-mail to ensure that all the concerns were addressed. Staff received a second revision of the Sign Program on January 3, 2008, and a third version of the Sign Program on February 13, 2008. Most of the review comments were addressed in the last revision and staff generally supports the Sign Program. However, there were two elements of the Sign Program that were not addressed to the satisfaction of staff. On March 10, 2008, the project was heard at the Old Town Local Review Board meeting. Staff presented the project and asked that the Board review and comment on two issues. Section III.G.4.of the Old Town Specific Plan specifically prohibits roof mounted signs. For that reason, staff does not support the proposed building identfcation roof sign. Staff recognizes that the Temecula Stage Stop complex is designed to resemble an old train depot, and that, old train depots often had roof mounted identification signs; however, the sign is inconsistent with the Specific Plan. Second, staff does not support the four blade signs proposed on the second floor balcony of the east building. The blade signs are proposed for interior building units with interior courtyard entrances. These units do not have any frontage which justifies the signs along the eastern elevation. Staff believes the signs are excessive for a single tenant and too many signs along the east elevation compromise the architectural integrity of the building. The Old Town Local Review Board provided comments of support and recommended approval of the project with staffs recommendation to delete the roof signs and blade signs. A Condition of Approval requiring the removal of the roof signs and the projecting signs from the second story of the east building has been placed on the project (See Condition of Approval No. 9). ANALYSIS The Temecula Stage Stop complex consists of three buildings interconnected by several interior courtyards, stairways, and pedestrian corridors. The Sign Program outlines signage criteria for each building. The sign crterion has been carefully crafted to compliment the unique layout and architecture of the three buildings. The Sign Program criterion defines the allowable signage area per building frontage, allowable signage types, fonts, colors and materials, sign location, placement, and size. The proposed signage for the tenants within the complex includes wall mounted signs, projecting signs, under canopy pedestrian oriented signs, and hanging signs. The wall signs are to be fabricated from sandblasted or carved wood and are proposed to be installed on the buildings where appropriate for each tenant and as shown on the exhibits. contained in the Sign Program. The projecting signs are proposed to be installed on decorative brackets along OId Town Front Street and the adjacent parking lot to the east. These projecting signs will be installed on the second floor wooden beam elements to provide additional visibility for tenants as vehicles and pedestrians pass by. The under canopy signs are proposed to be installed perpendicular to the building in the pedestrian hallways on the first and second floors. Hanging signs are proposed to be installed parallel to the buildings where appropriate and as shown on the Sign Program exhibits. The Sign Program also includes proposed center identifications signs. These signs will act as entry signs when pedestrians approach the complex from the pedestrian corridor along Old Town Front Street and Sixth Street. The proposed center identification signage includes an existing monument sign and proposed roof sign along Old Town Front Street as well as a wall sign facing the east parking lot. The Old Town Specific Plan sets maximum signage area criteria for all signs placed on buildings in Old Town. The Old Town Specific Plan allows for 1.5 square feet of signage per linear foot of building frontage for the primary frontage (Old Town Front Street) and 0.5 square feet of signage per linear foot of secondary building frontage (Sixth Street and the east parking lot). Each building incorporates some combination of wall signs, projecting signs, under canopy signs, hanging signs and painted wall signs to reach the total allowable sign area to be installed on the building. With the removal of the proposed roof signs and four projecting signs along the east building, the proposed Sign Program is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan design guidelines and architectural compatibility requirements. Staff has ensured that the signage is consistent with the architectural style of the building, and wmpatible with the surrounding area. The allowable sizes are in proportion with the building fapade and are consistent with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Sign Program subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 26, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review, Section 15311, Class 11, Accessory Structures. The pr%ct consists of construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including on-premise signs. The project, a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop, consists only of the addition of signs to the site and buildings. FINDINGS Sign Program, Development Code Section 17.28.080 The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to all of the signs included in the Sign Program. This shall be accomplished by incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter styles, colors, illumination sign type, or sign shape. All signage proposed in center is included in the Sign Program. The Sign Program incorporates a center identification signs, amulti-tenant monument sign, and individual tenant signage. The signage criteria within the program allows for a variety of styles and colors. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with and visually related to the buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or design motifs included in the building being identified. The signage includes architectural elements consistent with the building architecture such as color, texture, and style. The wall signage is carefully placed to promote the business while maintaining the architectural quality of the building. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with and visually related to surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring adjacent approved signs. The surrounding development will not 6e adversely affected by the proposed signage. All signage is consistent with existing signage on surrounding centers and within Old Town. The Sign Program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants. The Development Code allows revisions to Sign Programs either 6y completing a Minor or Major Modification application to the original Sign Program. New signage or a change in signage will be permitted administratively bythe Planning and Building Departments. The proposed program satisfies the intent of the sign criteria in the Development Code, except that flexibility is allowed with regards to sign area, number, location, and height. The proposed Sign Program is consistent with the sign standards listed in the Development Code and Old Town Specific Plan while still satisfying the applicant's request for variation in sign sizes, colors, styles, and placement. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Comprehensive Sign Program PC Resolution Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing VICINITY MAP / ~ 1 `~ ~ \ /~~o~ ~~~ ~~\ \ ~ yw ~ \~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' dF" i ~~ \ i" ~ ~ ~ f / . ,\ \ ` \,J ~ \ ~~'~ -, ~\ ~ ( +' ~ i ¢4 ~\ ~ ~ ~ \ '~ ~ /, `~ \ /,, ~ i i ~ ~U ~' i ~~ i ~ \ \ ~~ ~. ~ ~' ~ ~ea~ . `~ °~. `,. / ~ "°., \ j `~~ :, ~ ~, ,, , . ~~ i '. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `, ~ > ~~ `~, o so ,~ ~ ~ ~, y~ \ ~ . ~%~ ~ ~<, ~.`, ,~, -, , .~ ,~ ~`` ~, 1 ;. ` .~,% v ~ ~~ >~ ~;~~, ~~~ ~~.\ ~ ~ ~` \\ ~c,. ~~~ Feel ~;~ ;~ i ice/ ~~ i < ~ \ -_ ~ -_~ ME0.CEOE5 ST ~ \\ _:___ _ __i~. STAGE STOP BUILDING SIGN PROGRAM dt ~v v+q -~ ~n s., t1t ~' .,~jJ f. G "'~ T ~" ~ -~ r.. YY r ~ } ~ •~ , X2`4 ~~~? ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ' ( ~ ~ i • it' ~ .~ 1~~ . cam - 'z K~f ... . _ „ a '., Lead Agency: City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dana Schuma, Associate Planner 951.694.6444 Prepared for: Mr. Ed Dool 28464 Old Town Front Street Temecula, CA 92590 951.202.5233 Prepared by: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services 42011 Avenida Vista Ladera Temecula, CA 92591 Matthew Fagan, Angie Douvres 951.699.2338 In Conjunction With: Walt Allen Architects 28465 Front Street, Suite 201 Temecula, CA 92591 Walter Allen, Chris Campbell, Martina Masarani 951.693.1012 February 2008 STAGE STOP BUILDING SIGN PROGRAM This Sign Program has been prepared for the purpose of establishing and maintaining high standards of quality and aesthetics throughout the Stage Stop Building. The Sign Program is intended to allow flexibility in signage to accommodate tenant needs and to maintain continuity within the Stage Stop Building. This Sign Program will allow flexibility in signage, yet not compromise the aesthetics of the Stage Stop Building. This will be achieved by establishing quality design guidelines and standards for all signs placed on the building, and by identifying approved sign envelopes for all proposed signs. The Stage Stop Building Site Plan is contained within Exhibit A. Sign envelopes for signage, including, but not limited to wall-mounted, projecting, hanging, center identification and monument signs are depicted on Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G and H. All sign types shall be placed in a location that is approved by the landlord. They must comply with the design guidelines and size requirements of this Sign Program and are subject to approval by the City of Temecula. The Sign Program components, which are described in text and depicted with pictures and graphics are contained below and consist of the following: General Standards, Sign Standards, Approval Criteria, Non-Conforming Signs, Design Guidelines, and Modifications to the Sign Program. I. General Standards The standards, guidelines and provisions contained within this comprehensive Sign Program shall govern the exterior sign approvals for the Stage Stop Building. These guidelines are intended to ensure consistency, continuity and thematic harmony, and enhance the architectural quality of the building. Where an ambiguity arises or a different regulation exists, the standards within this comprehensive Sign Program shall be implemented as this program is structured to meet the unique signage requirements of the Stage Stop Building and provide signage requirements where the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) does not. If this comprehensive Sign Program does not address a particular situation, then the Director of Planning may be consulted for interpretation or clarification. Permitted Sian Tvpes a. Wall Signs b. Supergraphics c. Building Name Signs d. Window Signs (including 2ntl story) e. Under Canopy Signs f. Projecting Signs g. Temporary A-Frame or Sandwich Board Signs h. Daily Special Signs i. Holiday Bunting (shall comply with the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan) j. Accessory Signs (such as parking, directional, building maps/floor plans, elevator signs, or other signs used for the entire building) k. Menu Boards i. Hanging Signs m. Rear Facing Signs n. Internal Signage o. Temporary Signs (cloth only) p. Outdoor Display q. MonumenUFree-standing Signs r. Awning Sign on t*' Level Prohibited Sian Tvaes* • Roof Mounted Signs -with the exception of the train depot style building identification signs as depicted on exhibits B -Hof this sign program • Animated, inappropriate signs that are not period appropriate or detract from the architectural quality of the building. • Rotating, moving, emitting or flashing signs. • Balloon signs • Ambient air balloons • Internally illuminated signs (including window signs) • Neon tube signs • Paper, cloth or plastic streamers or bunting • Formed plastic or injection molded signs (excluding internal signage not visible from Old Town Front Street). • Statues used for advertising • Traffic sign replicas • Plywood signs • Signs mounted on railings, banisters, or balusters • Non-governmental flags • Awning Signs *These provisions recognize there maybe legally non-conforming signs. However, all signs that are not legally non-conforming and all new building signs shall be subject to the regulations contained in this Sign Program. II. Sian Standards Wall signs shall be permitted at a ratio of one (1) square foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage along Old Town Front Street and Sixth Street, and one-half (.5) square foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage along Sixth Street (south elevation). Other signs, such as projecting, under canopy, etc., are not included in this wall sign ratio, but have their own size specification in this Sign Program listed below. All hanging and projecting signs shall be located within the approved envelopes as depicted on Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G and H. All other sign types such as wall, under canopy and window signs are given more flexibility of location and require the approval of the building owner and Planning Director if a sign is smaller than twelve square feet. If a sign is twelve square feet or larger, review by the Old Town Local Review Board (OTLRB) is required pursuant to the OTSP. Businesses are permitted a maximum of one and one-half (1.6) square feet of total sign area per linear foot of primary street frontage and one-half (.5) square feet per linear foot of secondary street frontage. Each tenant may use any combination of the following permitted sign types. Each tenant may have more than one sign type provided the maximum sign area shall comply with the permitted square feet of sign area allowed pursuant to building frontage and that the sign complies with the allowances prescribed within this Sign Program and as outlined below. a. Building Name Signs The intent of the building sign is to identify the Stage Stop Building. The maximum size shall not exceed 10% of the wall surface of the building elevation. Building name signs are permitted only in the specified areas depicted on Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G and H. b. Supergraphics The purpose of permitting wall Supergraphics is to allow the advertising or depiction of products or scenery that may have been available in an 1890's marketplace. Supergraphics do not count against the sign allowance for the building provided that the supergraphic does not advertise a specific business. Maximum size shall not exceed 60% of the wall surface. c. Wall Signs Walls signs shall be permitted at a ratio of one (1) square foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage along Old Town Front Street, and one-half (.5) square foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage along Sixth Street. This ratio does not include other signs such as projecting, under canopy, hanging, etc., but is only for wall signs. Wall signs shall always be in proportion and scale with the building elevation and building entry. Internal illumination of wall signs is prohibited. A Wall Sign shall be permitted at a tenant entrance located internally to the building so long as it is not visible from off-site or the public right of way. d. Hanging Signs The maximum size is six (6) square feet; a minimum of seven (7') foot vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. Hanging signs shall be located in the approved sign envelopes as depicted on Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G and H to ensure the sign is in portion and scale with the building elevation and adjacent signs. Hanging signs are reserved solely for tenant identification and only one hanging sign shall be permitted per tenant. e. Projecting Signs The maximum size of a projecting sign facing Old Town Front Street is six (6) square feet and shall not extend more than four feet trom the wall surface. The maximum size of all other projecting signs is three (3) square feet and shall not extend more than four feet from the Walt surface. All other No illumination is permitted. Projecting signs shall only be attached to the building or building columns (in the approved sign envelopes as depicted on Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G and H), but not to poles or other signs. Projecting signs may encroach into the public right-of-way a maximum of three (3) feet subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning. Projecting signs are reserved for tenant identification only and not intended as secondary signs. f. Under Canopy Signs Permitted under a canopy, roof, covered walkway or porch (not parallel to the street); the maximum size of three (3) square feet; a minimum of seven (7') foot vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. Under Canopy signs shall always be in portion with the building and have a human scale. Under canopy signs are pedestrian oriented signs, not typically seen from the street but read by the strolling patron. An Under Canopy sign shall be permitted at a tenant entrance located within internal portions of the Stage Stop Building so long as it is not visible from off-site or the public right of way. g. Rear Facing Signs The Stage Stop Building has parking and businesses that only face the existing parking lot at Sixth Street. Each business is permitted a sign on the parking lot elevation and shall comply with the provisions of the sign types listed within this Sign Program. Rear facing signs shall be a maximum of three (3) square feet. h. Permanent Window Signs On the ground level, window signs shall not exceed 20% of the total window and door areas visible from the exterior of the building. On the second level, window signs shall not exceed 30% of the window or door areas visible from the exterior of the building. Gold leaf and paint are permitted materials for Window Signs. A-Frame/Sandwieh Board Signs One A-frame or sandwich board sign shall be allowed per property on Friday, Saturday, Sunday and legal holidays that fall on a Monday during business hours only. The maximum size is 3.5 feet high and 2 feet wide. A-frame signs shall not block the sidewalk and shall not be illuminated. No permit is required, but A- frame/Sandwich Board signs shall comply with these provisions. j. Daily Special Signs One daily special sign is permitted, up to four (4) square feet for each restaurant or other eating establishment. Daily Special Signs shall not obstruct pedestrian travel and shall be located outside of the public right-of-way. k. Menu Boards Menu boards may contain only the name of the menu item. One menu board is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. The menu board shall not exceed four square feet and must be located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance. I. Temporary Signs Grand opening and special event signs are allowed in conformance with the provisions of the OTSP for permitted materials and the City of Temecula Development Code for permitted time frames of temporary cloth banners. m. Holiday Bunting Holiday bunting shall comply with the provisions of the OTSP. n. Accessory Signs General building signs such as parking, directional, pedestrian maps, etc., that direct patrons and pedestrians shall not be counted toward the total allowable building signage. o. Interior Facing Signs Interior facing signs include any internal or interior signage not visible from the public view, and include, but are not limited to door signs; window signs; directional signs, directory, elevators; suite number signs; or lavatory signs. Internal signage shall not be included toward the total allowable building signage. Each business/tenant with an interior plaza frontage may have one sign not to exceed one and one-haH (1.5) percent of the total interior wall area of the building. p. Outdoor Display Replicas of items that were commonly found in the turn of the century, such as covered wagons, wagon wheels, railroad carts, and livestock, located out of the public right-of-way are encouraged. q. MonumentlFree-standing Sign Monument signs are permitted for centers with 150' or more of street frontage. One (1) monument sign shall be allowed for the Stage Stop building. An existing/approved MonumenVFree-standing Sign is currently located along the Old Town Front Street frontage. No changes or modifications are requested with this Sign Program. Any future changes requested for the existing monument sign must be consistent with the criteria for awning signs at the time of the request. Awning Sign on 1" Level An existing/approved Awning Sign is located along the Sixth Street frontage. No changes or modifications are requested with this Sign Program. Any future changes requested for the existing awning sign must be consistent with the criteria for awning signs at the time of the request. No additional awning signs will be permitted within the Stage Stop Complex. III. Aaproval As mandated in OTSP Sign Regulations, Section G.2, a sign permit is required prior to placing, erecting, moving, reconstructing, altering, or displaying any sign within the Stage Stop Building. For all exterior signs two complete and fully dimensioned sets of colored shop drawings or photos of the proposed sign shall be submitted to the City of Temecula and the shop drawings or photos shall include the Tenant's entire building fagade elevation (as much as possible of the building elevation) showing the proposed sign to scale as well as storefront (partial building) elevation and dimensions, also to scale, showing the location, size, color, construction and installation details. A letter of authorization from the landlord or property owner is also required. If a sign is smaller than twelve square feet, it must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Signs over twelve square feet shall be reviewed by the OTLRB. IV. Non-Conforming Signs Legally non-conforming signs shall be brought into conformance when existing tenants vacate the building or a new sign replaces the legally non-conforming sign. All other signs, including new signs, shall comply with the criteria, guidelines and standards of this Sign Program. V. Design Guidelines The following Design Guidelines are intended to ensure the signage for Stage Stop Building results in high quality signs that are compatible and complement the architectural style of the building and other appropriate signs that currently exist on the structure: • Placement of signage is an important element to the building's aesthetic quality. Signs shall be placed to relate to and enhance the building architecture. Signs shall be placed in an appropriate location, in proportion with the scale of building elements. Signs maybe placed in different areas. A particular sign may fit well on a 9 plain wall area, but would overpower the finer scale and proportion of the lower store front. For example, a sign that is appropriate for the building entry may look inappropriate above the ground level. The approved sign envelopes and maximum size requirements stated above will help ensure proper placement and proportion of the signs. • Sign lettering should contain clear and legible fonts. Western style typefaces that are easy to read should be utilized. Decorative fonts are difficult to read and make the sign ineffective. • Provide a brief, clear message on the sign. Typically, the fewer words the more effective the sign. • Creative, unique, quality signs are encouraged. However, strange and awkward signs that are unnecessarily narrow, oddly shaped, or unrelated to the products or services being provided on site can restrict the legibility of the message. • When appropriate, utilize shapes and characteristics of the products being used or sold. • For pedestrian oriented signs such as projecting, hanging or wall signs, they should be smaller and have ahuman-scale, not oriented to the vehicle. • Incorporate directional and general building signage such as directory, parking, elevator, etc. at appropriate locations and entries to guide the patrons throughout the site. ColorsANaterials In order to achieve continuity and compatibility among signs, the colors and materials need to be similar and complementary to each other and the building. The following guidelines should be incorporated when selecting sign colors and materials: • Colors should be compatible with the architecture and color of the building and contribute to the design integrity. • Colors should be from the approved Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette. However, nationally recognized colors and logos which deviate from the approved color palette shall be reviewed by the OTLRB and maybe permitted with OTLRB approval. • Some color combinations render a sign illegible. Therefore careful consideration should be given to the color selection. • Use significant contrast between the background, lettering or symbol colors. • Limit the colors on one sign. Too many colors overwhelm the basic function of communication. Limited use of the accent colors can increase legibility, while large areas of competing colors tend to confuse the reader. Given the early 1900's western nature of Old Town and the Stage Stop Building, the sign needs to reflect a period appropriate material that will be complementary to the architecture of the building. The following are materials that would be appropriate for the Stage Stop Building: 10 Permitted Sian Materials • Signs made of carved or sand blasted wood. • Signs of synthetic material that take on the appearance of wood are permitted; however, approval of the landlord, Planning Director and OTLRB is required prior to installation of the sign. • Metal • Wrought Iron or Similar Material • Painted Wall Signs Prohibited Sian Materials • Plywood Neon • Injection Molded or Formed Plastic • Vinyl VI. Modifications to the Sign Program Although this Sign Program was written to be a long-range planning document that will be effective now as well as in the future, it is anticipated that modifications will be necessary over time as the built environment in Old Town changes and the composition of the tenants change (i.e. if antique businesses are no longer the prominent business in Old Town or more restaurants are developed). Modifications shall be approved through an amendment to this Sign Program by a separate planning application, review by the OTLRB and approval by the Planning Director. List of Exhibits A. Site Plan B. South Elevation C. East Elevation D. West Elevation E. Section Through Bus Bay Building F. Section Through Wine & Beer Garden G. First Floor Site Plan H. Second Floor Site Plan 11 z z ~XQ CO a ~ O w~~ W H ~~w ~x ~. ~..y' lt~~ w' m~~wa I try vapy'y ~apeM ~".,~' i uaisusdx~ do}g a~s1S y 1 ~ ~ ,~;, V ~t33NtSHA/S Ii ~I I I ~ :~' ~ i III :;~I ICI i I:;~ I L. __ ~ __ h -' I I i ~ ~ i i ~ 4~ • - :._.. ......'i _, _ __ i i ~. i _ »~ 9_ {i i -_ _ F 1 .,9 ~r =1 Y ° -_ +- - -- =-- t.__- ____e___ _ O 1~__ . :im. .. - 1.... II T ~-c I . -_ I 4 ~. n ~:-:: i. 1 __ I ~i..- -- I ~ r j{~~ , ; , F -~ -- I ~~a ~ c~ ~ 4 h. ~ t i c - I I 5 J ~ d :~ I O 4 ~~ i ~ Iti ~ `.+ 3' ~ ..~ _ _ I .-.r- _._ I aK ~ I i I z z Q m ~ Q m W W a -~ = w O W~j~ W ~ ~ O N z N z ~ c~ ~ ~ o w ~' ~ F- z W N ~ W O z U a Q H a z ~ o ~ y o w ~ V N ~ z c7 a ~ Z ~ ~ O ~ _ ~ z U O ~ z U ~ ~ ~- w w U Z °C EW- a ~ o ~ ~ o ' ~ 0 , ~ ~ J Z O Z Z O ~XQ m w W d XOw W ~ ~ (~ l1J Z ~_ W F- Z O J J Q Z 0 Q I-- z W D Z_ O J m -_ ~- r z ~ _ N 0 W V V 4 J Q ~ ~ o ~ z v ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ Z Z ~ ~ = U ~ Z ~ N V w ~ a D 1 G°~ _p ~ Z Z ~ 0 ~ X Q W ~ =pw X ~--. ~ W ~ ~ I- z iN LL N O Z z ~ ~ ~ N ~ O D ~ W H U W W lL ~ V ~ ~ L? Q ~ Q J C7 ~ d z ~ z '~ o ~ W U m a ~ a A O ~ V O ~ F- W U O W _~ ~ ~ O N z cs z C~ z Q x z Q z W H z (~ Z U ~ G~ O J 0. Q L^ z (7 N H Z W Z O U a a oC W a C'J z X W C'3 Z_ O J Z m _~ ~ } Z Q Qm W d (A m W m Xo~ W ~ O W W Q 1- ~ Z ~' o_ H U z c~ 0 w F z w 0 z Q N W 0 w a a O Z Q U W O z z cs O N w v a J Q Z O U w o~ 0 O U W i Z ~ ~ z v~ z z = V Z (~ ~ ~ J ~ a ~ i~ Z W Q C'3 Z OW ~ W Zm a «s L.L d W X I_WZ = O W ~ j O ~ a= ~ ~ O f--' W z 0 w z w O z Q F- W O W a a O z Q U W D Z z O w U U a_ J Q Z O U w 0 r O U W i Z (3 Ul Z Z Ul z z = V Z C7 Z ~ ~ a Doi Z O~ ~ J ~ a (3 CL !-' ~=W~ 00 a ~ wp0 ~ ~ w~ Imo- ~ U) ~- ~ z N ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ o '' w ~ z o ~ w w ~ O U U Z a a ~ z w z ~ ~ ~ cn z 0. r w g Z c~ ' ~ c~ Z o Z ° ~ ~ ? z -~, U O = Z U ~ N ~ w a F V w w a s z ~ ~ ~ O D ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . ~~ U a a W a c~ z H N x w zz O~ ~ a ¢_~ _ ~ ~ mwo Xp0 W ~ ~- ~a W z ~O ~U Z z ~ ~ N ~ LL ~ O W o ~, or z z ~ 0 0 a ~ ~ ~ 3 z z W ~ O F- Z U o ~ a m W 0 c~ z 0 J m ~,. N z ~ z ~ ~ ~ N o W ~' ~ o ~ z W ~ W o Z v d Q J ~ Z o Z ~ N o w ~ V ~ cg Z o a a ~ z vi o z a z ~ z x v ~ ~ V ~- z w ~ (A ~ Q W d J ~ ~ o ~ ~ ' ~ 0 , PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0265, A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE TEMECULA STAGE STOP COMPLEX LOCATED AT 28464 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On September 17, 2007, Matthew Fagan Consulting Services, filed Planning Application No. PA07-0265, a Sign Program in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May, 7, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07-0265 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Code Section 17.28.080 -Sign Program A. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to all of the signs included in the Sign Program. This shall be accomplished by incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter styles, colors, illumination sign type, or sign shape; All signage proposed in the center is included in the Sign Program. The Sign Program incorporates a center identification sign, amulti-tenant monument sign, and individual tenant signage. The signage criteria within the program allows for a variety of styles and colors. B. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with and visually related to the buildings andior the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or design motifs included in the building being identified; The signage includes architectural elements consistent with the building architecture such as color, texture, and style. The wall signage is carefully placed to promote the business while maintaining the architectural quality of the building. C. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring adjacent approved signs; The surrounding development will not be adversely affected by the proposed signage. All signage is consistent with existing signage on surrounding centers and within Old Town. D. The Sign Program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants; The Development Code allows revisions to Sign Programs either by completing a Minor or Major Modification application to the original Sign Program. New signage or a change in signage will be permitted administratively bythe Planning and Building Departments. E. The proposed program satisfies the intent of the sign criteria in the Development Code, except that flexibility is allowed with regards to sign area, number, location, and height; The proposed Sign Program is consistent with the sign standards listed in the Development Code and Old Town Specific Plan while still satisfying the applicant's request for variation in sign sizes, colors, styles, and placement. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Sign Program: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15311, Class 11 Accessory Structures). The project consists of construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including on-premise signs. The project, a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop, consists only of the addition of signs to the site and buildings. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA07-0265, A Comprehensive Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop, located at 28464 Old Town Front Street, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7th day of May 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of May 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA Planning Application No. Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA07-0265 A Comprehensive Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop complex located at 28464 Old Town Front Street 922-023-022 N/A N/A N/A May 7, 2008 May 7, 2010 Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicanUdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount ofSixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. The perrnittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 8. The design of all signs on the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Sign Program, contained on file with the Planning Department. 9. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department three copies of the Sign Program eliminating the roof signs and the east building second floor projecting signs from the Sign Program. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document ConverterUemp\878852.doc Notice of Public Hearing Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Planning Application No. PA07-0265 Matthew Fagan Consulting Services 28464 Old Town Front Street A Comprehensive Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop complex In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be issued in compliance with CEQA (Section 15311, Class 11 Accessory Structures) Dana Schuma, Associate Planner City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 May 7, 2008 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or priorto, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. r- ~ ~. ~~ 1AERCE6EA'37 ~~ ~~ Project Site ~` r~ s~ ¢ q. ~o °~p~ z:.~ `any i ~ 9f 96 $' !~ SS F~ Qµ n ] 1'0 CCO E]C en C:\Program Files (x68)lNeevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\878852.doc ITEM NO.6 STAFF REPORT -PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2008 PREPARED BY: Betsy Lowrey, Junior Planner PROJECT Planning Application Numbers PA07-0239, PA07-0240, and PA08-0021, SUMMARY: a Development Plan, Certificate of Historic Appropriateness and Sign Program for the restoration of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex proposing reuse of six historic structures totaling 13,390 square feet and 13,738 square feet of historically appropriate new construction for retail/office, restaurant and museum display uses on four acres within the Vail Ranch Specific Plan zoned Historic Commercial located at Temecula Parkway and Redhawk Parkway RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332 Class 32 In-fill Development PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Jerry Tessier, President of Arteco Partner General Plan Highway Tourist (HT) Designation: Zoning Designation: Vail Ranch Specific Plan: Historic Commercial Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: The four-acre site is known as the Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex located within the Redhawk Towne Center (fenced off from public access) and includes six existing historic structures: The Wolf Store, Caretaker House, Cookhouse, Bunkhouse, Water Building and Machine Barn North: Existing parking lot for the Redhawk Towne Center South: Existing retail shops within the Redhawk Towne Center (currently Ross and Famous Footwear) East: Temecula Creek flood channel West: Existing retail within Redhawk Towne Center (currently Kohls) Proposed Lot Area: Total Floor Area/Ratio: Landscape Area/Coverage: 174,144 sq fU4 acres (existing) 27,128 sq fU0.16 98,542 sq fU56.59% Parking Required/Provided: 189 spaces (existing) Allowable/Required 20,000 sq ft (required) 52,243 sq fU0.30 (allowable) 34,828 sq ft/20% (required) 189 spaces (required) BACKGROUND SUMMARY The proposed project site, located on four acres, is adjacent to the historic Luiseno Indian Village of Temecula and is also the exact crossing point of the Southern Emigrant Trail of the 1800's (and later the Butterfield Stage Mail Route from 1858-1861). In 1904, when Walter Vail acquired 87,500 acres for cattle ranching activities, the project site became the Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex -headquarters to the largest cattle ranch in California ("Vail Ranch") - until it was all sold in 1964. Since the sale of Vail Ranch in 1964, there have been several owners and plans for the Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex site. As development occurred around the project site, litigation ensued to preserve the historic structures and the Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex site was condensed to approximately four acres and fenced off for future renovation and preservation of the site with six remaining historic structures: the Wolf Store, Cookhouse, Bunkhouse, Caretaker House, Machine Barn and Water Building (the Caretaker House, Machine Barn and Water Building were relocated onto the four-acre site in order to be saved). The project site was later annexed by the City of Temecula as part of the Redhawk Annexation in 2005. Legal agreements mandate that the developer/owner restore the four-acre Historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex site and, upon completion of the renewed project, dedicate ownership to the County of Riverside. In turn, the County of Riverside will lease the renewed project site back to the developer. Consequently, on August 20, 2007, Jerry Tessier of Arteco Partners submitted a Development Plan and Certificate of Appropriateness Application for the restoration of the Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex. On September 20, 2007, a DRC meeting was held to discuss site plan, landscaping and building design concepts (staff invited a County of Riverside representative to attend to ensure any concerns/comments from the County were addressed since the County will own the site after the development). In addition, staff worked closely with Vail Ranch Restoration Association ("VaRRA"), anon-profit corporation formed to heighten awareness of the rich heritage of the historic Vail Ranch. Staff also provided plans to the Historic Society for review. The applicant resubmitted plans on December 5, 2007. Staff received comments from VaRRA on January 7, 2008; and on January 22, 2008 the Infrastructure Beautification Committee provided comments on plans for a Southern Emigrant monument (to be constructed on the site). On January 29, 2008, a second DRC letter was sent to the applicant to include these comments and corrections to the plans. The applicant resubmitted final plans on March 31, 2008 and the project was heard and approved by the Old Town Local Review Board on April 14, 2008. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS As permissible by the Historic Commercial zone of the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the Highway Tourist (HT) land use designation of the General Plan, the restoration of the existing six historic structures and the additional new (historically appropriate) construction will house a variety of commercial enterprises including restaurant, retail and office uses. In addition, a total of 1,263 square feet has been preserved for museum display within the Wolf Store, Bunkhouse, Machine Barn, Water Building and the Caretaker House. It is the intent of the Applicant to seek National Historic Register District status for the Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex after entitlement of the project. Site Plan The site plan meets the minimum requirements of the development standards for the land use designation of Highway Tourist (HT). Its building lot coverage of 15.6 percent is well below the maximum permitted tot coverage of 30 percent. In addition, the proposed landscaping/open space coverage of 56.6 percent exceeds the minimum 30 percent for the HT zone. The site plan calls for various elements to enhance and recreate the history of Vail Ranch including a clear definition of the old Southem Emigrant Trail (the Butterfield Stage Path), open areas for outdoor events, wooden patio decks to promote outdoor dining, a story telling area, wooden benches, a water tower, windmill, hay wagon stage and various pedestrian pathways wide enough for horse and hayrides. The site will provide a monument to represent the specific segment of the Southern Emigrant Trail at the Vail Ranch Headquarters. In addition, smaller monuments with plaques will be located outside each of the historic buildings to provide the history of each structure. The perimeter of the site will be outlined with a wooden three-rail split fence (stained to match the wooden trim of the Redhawk Town Center surroundings). Originally, staff requested four-rail split fencing (as it historically surrounded the Wolf Store); however, the Old Town Local Review Board determined based upon the Applicant's request and Vail Ranch Association's agreement that 3-rail split fencing would be less obtrusive around the perimeter of the site; and agreed that the Wolf Store should still incorporate 4-rail split fencing. Two ranch gateways will enhance the front and rear of the project site consistent with the western ranch theme. The front sidewalk will be expanded to ten feet wide and will also incorporate two ornamental emblems/motifs (similar to the emblem/motifs found in the sidewalk at the four corners of Old Town Front Street and Main Street) to enhance the main front entryways to the project site. In addition, two garden benches made of local granite block-style veneer with a wooden trellis and climbing vines will add seating and decor to the front sidewalk. The Old Town Local Review Board, upon viewing the rendering and at the request of the Applicant, determined that the location of the trellis in front of the Wolf Store can be moved to the right so as to not block the Wolf Store and to balance the site. Architecture The concept of the proposed project is to restore all of the existing historic structures by repairing and rehabilitating each of them in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and to ultimately obtain National Historic Register status for the Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex. It is the intent that the existing structures remain intact except for paint colors and an add-on to the rear of the Cookhouse, Bunkhouse and the Machine Barn. The add-ons are proposed so that they are only visible from the rear and constructed with different wall finishes to ensure a visible distinction between the historic structure and the new addition. A proposed new retail structure will also be constructed on the site, and will be western frontier architecture compatible with the existing historic structures. A history of the site is attached as Schedule I to provide a very detailed description of the architecture of each historic structure; however, the following will outline the proposal to restore each structure: Wolf Store The proposal will repair and repaint all restorable materials and surfaces; and replace any missing and/or irreparable materials with matching materials. The plaster/adobe (and areas of board and batten) will remain white with wooden barn red trim. The wood shingle roof will be repaired as necessary. An outdoor patio area along the south elevation with four-rail split fencing is proposed. Cookhouse The proposal will repair and repaint all restorable materials and surfaces; and replace any missing and/or irreparable materials with matching materials. The original Cookhouse exterior wall surface will be six inches wide horizontal wood siding and painted bam red. The old schoolhouse/dining hall add-on (protruding from the north elevation) wall surface will be 12 inches wide horizontal wood siding and painted brown; and the new kitchen add-on proposed at the rear (the west elevation) will be light tan stucco with a corrugated metal roof to match the roofing materials of the original structure. All trim and porch railings will be white. An outdoor patio area with white picket fencing is proposed. Bunkhouse The proposal will repair and repaint all restorable materials and surfaces; and replace any missing and/or irreparable materials with matching materials. The original plaster wall surface will be repaired as necessary and painted deep walnut green. A kitchen add-on is proposed at the rear (the south elevation) with a light tan stucco wall finish and a corrugated metal roof to match the roofing materials of the original structure. A trellis and an outdoor patio area along the north elevation with a wooden three-rail split fencing is proposed. All trim on the structure will be white. Machine Barn The proposal will repair and repaint all restorable materials and surfaces and replace any missing and/or irreparable materials with matching materials. The original structure's wall surface (vertical wood siding) will be repaired as necessary and painted barn red. An add-on is proposed at the rear (the east elevation) with a wood stained six inch siding material and a corrugated metal roof to match the roofing materials of the original structure. Two outdoor patio areas with wooden three-rail split fencing are proposed. Caretaker House The caretaker house will be relocated (for the second time) across the site. The proposal will repair and repaint all restorable materials and surfaces, and replace any missing and/or irreparable materials with matching materials. The original plaster exterior wall surface will remain white and the wooden trim will be painted blue/green. The wood shingle roof will be repaired as necessary. The Water Building The proposal will repair and repaint all restorable materials and surfaces, and replace any missing and/or irreparable materials with matching materials. The original plaster exterior wall surface will remain white and the wooden trim will be painted tan. The corrugated metal roof will be repaired as necessary. New Retail Structure A new 7,765 square foot retail structure is architecture similar to a large barn. Materials with the existing historic structures, including corrugated roof. proposed will provide awestern-ranch style proposed for the new structure are compatible board and batten wood stained siding and a Landscaoing Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure the proposed landscaping will serve to recreate the Vail Ranch history while meeting the landscape requirements of the Highway Tourist zone. The main feature of the landscape plan is the Southern Emigrant TraiUButterfield Stagecoach Path that is proposed to run through the center of the site as it did 150 years ago. The trail and other pedestrian pathways are proposed to be a decomposed granite surface, conditioned to meet ADA accessibility requirements. Shrubs, bushes and groundcover are strategically proposed throughout the project site to enhance the structures and to outline the pathways. The intent is to provide an old-west feel of the Vail Ranch era with enough landscaping to decorate the site but minimal so as to mimic the old ranch. While turf is proposed near the center of the project (where the hay wagon stage is proposed) an open area of decomposed granite will also be located in the center for various events and activities planned for the site. The project proposes to keep the mature trees, which have been assessed by a certified arborist and will be appropriately treated and pruned as recommended. Additional trees are provided within the project site to provide shade and also to screen the adjacent retail centers. Access/Circulation A reciprocal access and parking agreement for the Redhawk Towne Center provides access and a shared parking arrangement for the businesses within the shopping center, including the Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex. A parking analysis dated November 1, 2007 shows 2,354 available parking spaces of which 1,425 parking spaces are utilized by current existing uses, leaving a surplus of 929 parking spaces to easily accommodate the required 189 parking spaces for the proposed restaurants and shops at the Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex. Sion Program The Sign Program proposes signage similar to sign design guidelines of the Old Town Specific Plan with flexibility in complying with signage requirements of the Vail Ranch Specific Plan. The sign materials will be carved, sandblasted, painted and/or stained wood or galvanized metal material using the Shervvin Williams Exterior Preservation Color Palette or colors similar to the palette (as approved on a case by case basis). The project allows for blade signs and hanging signs complementary to each structure. All signage will be lit with external spotlights or gooseneck lighting (no intemally lit signage is proposed or permissible on site). Wooden directional signs will be provided on the site intended for pedestrian use. In addition, a salvaged "Vail Ranch Headquarters" water tower will serve as an architectural entrance feature. Pursuant to the applicant's request, the Old Town Local Review Board determined that two multi-tenant monument signs along the front of the project, near the parking lot drive aisle would be acceptable so long as the signage is not internally lit and they are both one-sided. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 26, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32 In-Fill Development). Class 32 consists of projects characterized as In-fill Development meeting the conditions described below: The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project for the restoration of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex is consistent with the Highway Tourist land use designation. The General Plan Highway Tourist designation includes retail, office and restaurant uses. The project is consistent with all applicable General Plan policies and with all applicable zoning designation regulations and standards contained within the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the Development Code including the development standards within the Highway Tourist zoning district and all applicable requirements for lot coverage, building setbacks, floor area ratio, landscape requirements and parking requirements for projects in the Highway Tourist zone. The proposed project occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The proposed project for restoration of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex occurs within City limits. The project site is four acres and completely surrounded by urban uses. All surrounding uses are urban uses including commercial uses. The project site has no value for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project site is not known to have value or habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project houses six existing historic structures and the property has been utilized from time to time for special events. The project is in compliance with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. In addition, a Burrowing Owl Survey was conducted on November 16, 2007 and it was reported that the site is not conducive to burrowing owl occupation. The site is surrounded by commercial and urban development and has no value for endangered, rare or threatened species. The approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The approval of this project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The preservation of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex was planned for restoration while the surrounding development of the Redhawk Towne Center Shopping Center occurred. In addition, the Redhawk Towne Center includes parking to more than adequately provide parking spaces for the Historic complex. The City's Traffic Engineer has determined that the size of the project is insignificant as compared to the existing volumes on Temecula Parkway. Furthermore, it is not expected that noise, air quality or water quality will 6e impacted with the restoration of the historical Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site for the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex can be served by all required utilities and public services as proposed. The appropriate utility services already provide service to the adjacent retail structures and development within the Redhawk Towne Shopping Center. The proposed reconstructed site has been adequately designed to ensure that all public services will access the site for all necessary services during reconstruction and build- out. FINDINGS Development Plan (17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the Highway Tourist development standards of the Development Code and Highway Tourist land use designation and policies reflected for the City of Temecula General Plan. All development standards and general policies have been reviewed and the project, as conditioned, is consistent with the use regulations outlined within the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the Development Code and also complies with all applicable Building, Fire and City Municipal Codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing Vail Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines and the Highway Tourist development standards in the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regard to circulation, architectural design, and site plan design. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Certificate of Historic Appropriateness (Old Town Specific Plan Section V.F.7) The proposed structure is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City and is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed restoration of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex is consistent with the Vail Ranch Specific Plan, the Highway Tourist zone development standards of the Development Code and the Highway Tourist land use designation and policies reflected in the City of Temecula General Plan. All development standards and general policies have been reviewed and the project, as conditioned, is consistent with fhe Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the Development Code. The project also complies with all applicable Building, Fire and City Municipal Codes and has been adequately conditioned to protect and preserve the public health, safety and general welfare. The proposed structure is in conformance with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan, including the goals, objectives and policies, and architectural guidelines and standards. The Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex is located within the Vail Ranch Speck Plan; however, it is also within the boundaries of the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District as defined within Section V.8 of the Old Town Specific Plan. The paint colors, rehabilitation, additions and site improvements are proposed in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. In addition, the proposed restoration of the Historic Vail Ranch Headquarters have been reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board, the Riverside County Historic Commission, Vail Ranch Restoration Association and this local Historic Society and the project has been determined as historically appropriate mod cations in conformance with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan (relative to historic appropriateness requirements) and the Vail Ranch Specific Plan including the goals, objectives and policies, and architectural guidelines and standards. Sign Program (Development Code Section 17.28.080) The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to all of the signs included in the Sign Program. This shall be accomplished by incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors, illumination, sign type, or sign shape All signage proposed within the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex are included in the Sign Program. The Sign Program incorporates a common design element consistent with a western ranch theme including wooden or metal signs (with no internal illumination). Gooseneck down-lighting fixtures (or external spotlights) will be the source of sign lighting throughout the center and no neon or internally lit signage is permitted as is consistent with old west ranch theme. The primary center ident~cation sign will utilize a historic or historic replica of an old ranch water tower. Tenant signage includes two multi-tenant monuments signs constructed of rough hewn wood and local granite blocks, wooden post-mounted pedestrian directional signs, and wooden or metal hanging signs and/or blade signs at the tenant frontage. The signage criteria within the program allows for a variety of sizes and shape with a colors consistent with the Sherwin Williams exterior preservation color palette. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to' the buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or design motifs included in the building being identified. The signage includes old-west architectural elements consistent with the building architecture such as color, texture, and style. The wall signage is carefully placed to promote the business while maintaining the architectural quality of the building. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring adjacent approved signs. The surrounding development will not be adversely affected 6y the proposed signage. All signage is consistent with the Vail Ranch design guidelines for the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex. The Sign Program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants. The Sign Program allows for various types of signage to accommodate changes in building tenants without the need for Sign Program mod cation. However, if necessary, the Development Code allows revisions to Sign Programs either by completing a Minor or Major Modification application to the original Sign Program. New signage or a change in signage will be permitted administratively 6y the Planning and Building Departments. The proposed program satisfies the intent of the sign criteria in the Development Code, except that flexibility is allowed with regards to sign area, number, location, and height. To the extend the Sign Program does not comply with the requirements of the Development Code as to sign area, number, location and height, the proposed Sign Program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the objectives of this Chapter. The proposed Sign Program is consistent with the sign standards listed in the Development Code and the guidelines of the Vail Ranch Specific Plan except some flexibility was allowed with regards to number and location to enhance the nature of the historic Vail Ranch Complex Headquarters site and as permitted by the Development Code to allow flexibility with the sign criteria to enhance the proposed development. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Plan Reductions Sign Program PC Resolution -Development Plan Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval PC Resolution -Sign Program Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing -----------------SCHEDULE=~==_____-- -- ~Ppl(cuf~`~ Summary of the History of Vail Ranch Headquarters Site The Wolf Store / Vail Ranch Headquarters (also referred to as Pauba Ranch) is a complex of buildings nestled together on a site of approximately 4.0 acres near the intersection of Margarita Road and SR Highway 79 South, now within the lwundades of the City of Temecula. Three buildings have been relocated onto the remaining parcel. Currently it is surrounded by a shopping center, with Kohl's Department store immediately to the west, the Temecula Creek to the south, more stores to the east, and open parking to the north towards SR Highway 79 South. The buildings represent two distinct eras of history, the Wolf Store (circa 1867) with its mix of Mission /Spanish Colonial adobe and wood construction; and the Vail Ranch Headquarters site sVuctures {circa 1906), with wood framed bungalow Western stick style. Through the center of the property is one of the remaining segments of what was the Southern Immigrant Trail in the immediate area (also known as the Ft. Yuma Trail). This was the same trail system used by the Butterfield Stage during its period of operation through Temecula 1859-1861. Immediately upon entering the property one has the feeling of stepping back in time. Although all of the buildings are currently unused and have suffered some vandalism, the open space and mix of buildings give off a distinct impression of once having been a major hub of activity. The Wolf Store was the center of commerce and the heart of the Temecula village area from the late 1860's through the early 1880's. All indications are that it was initially built by Louis Wolf as a general store, and first showed up on San Diego County tax records in 1868. This building appears to be the only structure within CA-RIV-1522 that pre-existed the Vail Ranch era. However a portion of the Cookhouse described below may have been built circa 1880's. The Wolf Store (Exhibit A) is a large one-story single room adobe building 24' x 65', to which has been added on each side, a wood framed extension. On the east there is a 6' x 19' open porch with three wood support posts. This porch has a wood plank floor and a wood shingle roof which provides shelter for the two entrance doors. On the south there are 7 small room additions, each with its own door and window. On the west is a dirt floored lean-to addition, 11' x 24' with a sliding door at the north end and a window in the south end. The north side is a dirt Floored, open porch-like shelter 13' wide extending the entire 65 foot length of the building and supported on 9 wood posts. The gable roof extends in an unbroken plane on the north and south sides to cover the additions. Some of the roof framing and the shingle roofing do not appear to be part of the 19"' century original structure. The shingles are 36" long, a size in use after the turn of the century, and are known to have been replaced during stabilization & preservation work in 1998. The spaced roof sheathing, where visible, is tongue and grooved flooring pattern. The two doorways at the east end and another on the north side near the west end are raised about a foot above the existing inside floor, suggesting that there must have been a wood floor at the same level as the three door sills. The adobe room has a wood ceiling. At the western 1/3 of the room the ceiling is 1x10 boards nailed [o the bottom of the ceiling joists. At the eastern 2/3 of the room the ceiling boards are of varying widths, some up to 18" wide, and they are placed on top of the ceiling joists. All of the adobe has a white plaster covering, and the wood exterior is painted white. The date of construction of this building has variously reported to have been built from between 1859, with other dates into the mid-1860's. The structure was not included in the 1860 census, and research indicates that Louis Wolf was employed by John Magee until at least 1862. Louis Wolf did not begin acquiring property rights to the Little Temecula Rancho planting grounds until 1868 (SDC Deed Book #25:326), hence construction of the store more than likely immediately followed. The Wolf Store served at various times as a general store, cantina, inn, post office, stage stop, and labor brokerage location until the death of Louis Wolf in 1887. During the early years of the Vail Ranch period (circa 1910), a thin concrete floor was poured inside a portion of the adobe and a 32-inch concrete foundation poured around the base of the walls, which extends out approximately 3 inches; the southern interior wall was also reinforced with concrete. Shoring has been done in recent years to this southern wall, apparently to add structural support to the roof and ceiling. The double doors on the east wall of the adobe are set in 21 inches, and were clearly the entrance to the building. The northern set of doors, which have four panels and across-bar closure appears to be original; the southern doors are similar. Above both doors is a 4" x 12"header, supported by 1" x 12" boards on both sides of each door opening. Similar double doors are on the north wall, but they are constructed of 12-inch boards instead of solid panels. All of these doors have huge hinges - 8" x 4" in size. On the western wall of the adobe is an opening approximately 3 feet above the floor. There is no current indication that glass was ever in this opening, but it was clearly a window atone point in the buildings evolution. The siding on the western addition is board and batten (12-inch boards, 2'/cinch battens), painted white on the outside. There are no battens on Fhe north or south sides of the addition. The siding extends up to a wooden header and down to the level of concrete piers (identical to those which existed in the old Vail Ranch Implement Bam which was documented prior to being demolished and reconstructed). The southern extension of Wolf's Store represents the rooms Wolf built to accommodate stage coach travelers. There are seven rooms, six measuring approximately 10 feet x 11 feet and facing south, one measuring 6 feet 6 inches x 11 feet and facing west. Each room has its own door and window. The addition has board and batten siding (12" boards, 2%s"battens). There is a concrete foundation/footing under the western half of the addition, but none under the eastern half. The door sills are approximately 22 inches above ground level, indicating that steps were originally present. As might be expected of an adobe building approximately 138 years old, there is deterioration in some areas. Termite damage to the wood structural components, particularly the headers and doorframes, exists. Rafters, ceiling joists and ceiling boards show evidence of termite damage to some degree. Wood used in the construction of the various additions to the Wolf's Store has also suffered from termite and/or dry rot damage. The adobe walls have suffered damage from previous roof leaks, rodent tunneling and especially from the "wicking" effect of concrete which was poured adjacent to the original adobe walls. Vandalism has also occurred over the years to the building. Although the Cookhouse housed facilities for staff cooking and dining, as well as living quarters for the cook. At least two of the rooms were used by the ranch's bookkeeper as an office and living quarters. In viewing the eclectic differences in the roof line and structure, it is apparent that this building evolved over 6me into its current configuration. Documenting the construction of the various segments is difficult, however one of the early possibilities is an 1891 "Plat of the Little Temecula Rancho... ", surveyed for the settlement of Louis Wolf's estate. At essentially the same location as where the Vail Ranch cookhouse is now located was the house of Louis Wolf and his family. It was originally a simple rectangular building 42' x 52' to which has been added a wing 28' x 38' at the northwest corner, and two small rooms 7' x 8' and 7' x 14' on the south side. The exterior of the building was originally wood siding, but currently is white stucco. According to an oral interview with a Vail family member the stucco was applied circa 1950. The exterior wood trim around most of the windows, doors, front porch support posts, and front entry doors are all painted red. The interior partitions of this central, older portion are of single wall construction of tongue and groove boards running vertically and nailed to a horizontal member at floor, ceiling, and at mid-height. Ceilings are also wood, tongue and groove as are the floors. The original section has eight rooms plus a crude simple bathroom (that may have been added into the building). The largest room is at the center of the east side and has an 8" raised file area for a wood stove at its west end. The northwest corner room is a kitchen. The other rooms appear to be bedrooms. One of the two rooms adjoining the kitchen and north of the central room was the management dining room, the small one closest to the front door was used by the ranch accountant. A side-gabled roof covers the main original portion of the cookhouse, with an extended secondary front-gabled roof over the front entrance porch. The roofs have exposed rafters, open eaves and are covered with corrugated metal panels. Similar roofs are on the small southern additions, however with lower eave lines. The northwestern wing is the same, but with a perpendicular orientation to the main portion. Open porches with extended secondary roofs supported by 6" x 6" wood posts and covered by corrugated metal panels extend from the north and south walls of the northwestern wing. These porches serve to provide shelter for entrances to the main structure, as well as to the added wing. The northwestern wing was clearly built in two stages since the gable roof ridgeline of the eastern half runs north-south, while that of the western half has a lower pitch and runs east-west. The portion of this section of the building measuring 12' x 38' is clearly very old, and construction evidence suggests that it may have been built in the era of the Wolf Store, moved to the site, or constructed from old true dimensional rough cut lumber. During the Vail Ranch operational era this was the dining hall for the cowboys and ranchhands. On the west wall of this wing are two walk-in refrigerator rooms and a pantry with open shelving on every wall. Outside of these rooms is a central hall containing laundry facilities. The location of the Water Building has been changed and it has been reconstructed to the original dimensions. However this does not diminish the historic significance of its presence on the Vail Ranch. Due to the type of construction materials used in the original building (ceramic clay tile), it was not feasible to be moved. The date of construction of the original is unclear, but believed to be circa 1920's. At some point during the early stages of a prolonged legal process leading up io the Vail Ranch Company being given permission to build a dam to create Vail Lake, indications are that this building was originally used as a meteorological station, to gather data. In 1964 the building became the first office for the Ranch California Water District (RCWD). Although the building eventually was stuccoed and the windows covered by exterior shutters, according to Mr. Russ Vail and James Vail "Sandy" Wilkinson (personal communication), these improvements were done by RCWD. When Mr. Vail lived at the ranch the building was constructed of an extruded clay file block measuring 9%:' x 9'/z' x 36'/:", with 4 cells running the length of each tile. These tiles were mortared together and stacked to create the walls 9'/z" thick. The tiles were visible. There were no shutters on the windows originally. The building measures 20' on each side (Exhibit C}. There is a single wood door opening inward at the building's northeast corner, and one window on each wall. The front gable roof is steeply pitched, with exposed rafters and open eaves. The roof sheathing is covered by corrugated metal panels. The Bunk House is a large rectangle wood frame structure at the southern end of the Wolf Store / Vail Ranch Headquarters complex. Although the date of construction has been estimated in earlier reports to be 1905, this seems unlikely. A more accurate estimate would be circa 1906. This building does not appear to have been altered much or had any additions. The building is 30' x 98'-3" with a corner porch recessed at the northwest corner. There is a cenVal hall with twelve lwo-man bedrooms approximately 10' x 12' each, opening onto the hallway. At the southwest corner is a sitting-room with a central wood stove. At the east end is a combination bath-room, toilet room, showers and laundry space. This portion has a concrete floor while the rest of the building has wood floors. The fixtures and partitions in this utility area have been removed so the exact original configuration cannot be readily determined. Some of the bunk rooms have been altered by the removal of the separating partitions. Walls and ceilings are painted tongue and groove single-wall wood construction similar to the main ranch (cook) house. The exterior is now stucco. Verbal history indicates that the exterior was originally wood, but was recovered with stucco circa 1950's. The front gable roof is moderately pitched, with exposed rafters and open eaves. Like the other buildings in the complex, the roof is covered by corrugated metal panels. There are attic vents at the east and west ends of the bunkhouse that are painted red, as are the wood frames and sashes of the windows. There are nine windows on the south side of the building, ten on the north side, three on the west side, and four on the east end. Machinery Barn /Ranch Office also has been relocated from its original site so that it could be kept as part of the Vail Ranch complex legacy. This relocation was done with an effort to rebuild it as faithfully as it appeared originally. It is comprised of two distinct parts; it is not clear whether they were built at the same time or whether the office was (most likely) an addition, constructed at a later date. The exact age of this structure is unknown but was certainly in use during the early years of the Vail Ranch and most likely circa 1906. The barn portion of the building measures 31' x 99'. Ithas aside-gabled roof with a normal pitch, covered by corrugated metal panels supported on open framed trussed rafters. There is a dormer window near the southeast corner of the barn. The barn siding is single wall board and batten (12" boards, 2 %' battens) that has been painted red. Many of the battens are either missing or have been replaced with 2" wide strips of metal, possibly cut from oil drums. The north end of the barn has two second story windows, two first story windows, and a window in a large sliding door; none of the windows have glass. The west side of the barn has seven cutouts for windows, but only two have regular window frames; the remaining openings are covered with wood but appear to have been covered in a variety of materials (screen, sheet metal, heavy mesh, etc.). There are two large sliding doors, a garage door, and a hinged door on this side of the barn. The south side of the machinery barn has a large access opening at its southwest corner, four window cutouts that have now been covered by either wood or metal panels, and a large opening near the roof. The east side has two large sliding doors, four small windows above the level of the doors, and three first story window openings. None of the windows currently contain glass and all were apparently fixed with double or triple panes. The interior of the bam has been divided into two rooms. The northern room measures 21' x 31', and appears to have been both a tool, parts and blacksmith shop. There is a workbench and a door to the office on the west wall; bins for machinery parts are on the south and east walls. The larger, southern room was clearly used as a machine shop evolving as the ranch moved towards more mechanized equipment. The office wing extends to the west at the north end of the barn and measures 21' x 29'. It also has aside-gabled roof with exposed rafters and open eaves, but the pitch is lower and it has a much lower eave line than the barn. The office roofing is corrugated metal panels. The siding of the office wing is 5" wide lapped horizontal boards painted red. There are four windows on the south side and five windows on the north side; the west side is blank except for a louvered attic vent and awood-awninged opening. Four-inch wide flat boards, painted white, trim the windows as well as the door on the northern wall. The interior of the office is now divided into two rooms, the larger of which provides the main entry, and was the original office. The smaller room at the west end was added circa 1930. The walls and ceilings are composition board with wood battens. The Foreman's House (also known as caretaker's house, and adobe house) is another enigmatic structure on the ranch that evolved over time, but had to be relocated in order to be saved. Since the majority of the building was on a foundation it was movable, however the eastern portion which was originally of adobe construction was rebuilt using wood frame construction to the original adobe wall thickness dimensions. The building is a simple rectangular plan ranch house. It measures 66 fee[ (FJW) x 24 feet (N/S); the eastern portion measuring 24 feet x 24 feet is the reconstructed adobe section, the remainder is wood frame double-wall construction. The south half of this old "adobe" section is one room with a fireplace and exposed beam ceiling. The northern half is a bedroom, closets and a bathroom. All interior partitions within this section are wood frame. The two rooms immediately to the west of the "adobe" section have exterior doors to the north and south. These two rooms may have been an early addition or porch for the adobe as the roofing is the same as that over the adobe portion. The other half of this rather long and narrow house appears to have been a later addition as the roof construction is different and there was originally a noticeable offset at the ridge line. This west half is wood frame entirely and consists of a living room, kitchen, two bedrooms, bathroom and an enclosed porch at [he west entrance. Interior walls are pecky cedar and floors are carpet. The ceilings are wallboard and battens at 4 feet on center both ways. Kitchen and bath have vinyl flooring. The house is in generally good repair except that there are some plumbing problems, and damage from isolated vandalism. Exterior walls are stucco. The roofing consists of wood shingles which was redone when it was relocated in 1999. Some earlier reports on this property varied as to when the building was first constructed, but the most reasonable date seems to be circa 1918 (noted first in the Warner report 1983). This is somewhat corroborated by Louis Roripaugh. According to Mr. Roripaugh (Halloran report 1991), as early as grammar school and into his early high school days there was a Freeman family whose father was the manager of Vail Ranch. Mr. Roripaugh went to school with two of the Freeman boys, so he sometimes spent weekends at the ranch with his friends; this was about the Gme they were in fourth grade. The Freeman family lived in the caretaker's house, which according to Mr. Roripaugh was originally a small wooden building. They had a big family and added an adobe section onto the back of the original wooden structure. Interestingly, it has generally been assumed that the adobe section was the original structure, but Mr. Roripaugh as a primary source, clearly negates this common misconception. The building has a front gable roof with aloes-to-moderate pitch, exposed rafters, and open eaves. There are louvered attic vents above the main westside point of entry and foundation vents in various locations around the house. The house originally had a cellar which was not included in the relocation of the building. The exterior of the house had been covered by white stucco before the relocation, so there was no clear external delineation between the adobe and wood frame portions of the house except that the window openings at the eastern end are visibly deeper, indicating thicker walls. Wood frame, double-hung windows of various sizes are found on every side of [he house. Windows in the adobe portion of the house are recessed, while the remainder are flush, with 4-inch flat board trim and 1 Yz inch sills painted blue-grey. The remaining Landscape and open space is a significant contributing cultural resource to the overall historic district. Some old original trees remain, specifically two Califomia Sycamore at the northeast corner of the property, a large mulberry at the northeast corner of the cookhouse, and another mulberry in front of the cookhouse. A third mulberry is on the north side of the bunkhouse, and a California Sycamore is on the southside. A black walnut tree is in the area between the south wall of the cookhouse, and the north side of the water building. All of these trees are original to the early Vail Ranch days. Little or no evidence remains of the cooks garden, and other growth evidenced in early photos of the buildings and surrounding area. Through the heart of the site is the remains of the original Southern Emigrant Trail (also known as Fl. Yuma Trail). Available early photos show the remnants of this trail crossing the Temecula Creek and proceeding through the site. The Temecula Creek prior to the completion of construction of the Vail Dam in 1948, had significant water in it - to the extent that only a couple of places had solid enough base to support wagons and vehicles while fording the creek and not get mired in mud or quicksand, this area was one of two known safe crossing points. AERIAL MAP 0 280 580 1,120 1,88D Feet TNa mapwaam~e%be CiHdTameWaC+aWraPNk lnfametim SYSbm. M map b ExNxl trxn Dees Ceb proEUCN Ey tlb RNenWB CaIxNAeuafple DepNmeM W ex TranapprWpn xq LaM alenaeemed Aeeney d RNabNe Cwlty. TM Ciry d Temeabe uexnm no walrenyar heel bapma43ry Iarbs Wamauon cW eilW on Nh map Dab eM YJameWn nWUanbE en IXe mep w eugedb upaeb eM mo3&etlpn. TNa OaoerapNC Irlarmetim Syelam xM oe»r soxae ahouW b queries br tlb mostamxa IMmmelim. THa mnph nx ar nprimxmde. City of Temecula PA07-0239 a• ~io~ a ~ O^ 77 r~ • s~~= d?p Ue 5 Q :~i! iiea+ g~ O V Y ~~tF e~9 i _ ~~ a ~ _ ;_~ -hisis : °u~ Q <' (` ap T88s 3 ~i fE 4 IIT •a ~~~ g ~ , ~~~~ ;~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ G~~~~~ 933 ~€ E s~E~.~~.~#~!~~ 0pa=~p°7 ~~ ~ E~~ f!!~ §§ ~i S~i4 iiit~l~~§~oEB vJ Z~ ~j Q ~w ~j~Ea ~g~44 ~''¢~° ;~~~' ~ a~3~~ ~~y~t ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ N t~~~l~~~~~~~~s~~~.E17~~7~~.g ~i .~: ~! 444~~ !!§3~ §33~3~ # :€ U 9 ac f a ~ j :8 a~ 9- g ~C a~ B~ ~~fq y 3~• E ~ f~: g:a~~ !~~~ ~s&~ w ~ ~~ 3~ a a 9 ~ S ~~~~~ ~~ ~. ~~ ~~~~~~~qq%~ s~ s a ~~~$ a f g 0 0 X20. s Q, ~ ~ ~{{ r~~ ~~~~ 1'~ ~ ~~ ~ s - ~ :~E( mils ~ 9~ o ~. c 3, J c ~® ~ 8~ vt _ ~I ~ d . 9( ~~ s a r ~; ~~ ( $~xe ~~, 3 S ~~~~~~ }{~#~ ~f~~~~~0 ~f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ pI' p~~1~I~'~'~rr~~ (~' ' ,f UIl'R't'nyiU V~{Iiif~~~ QRI~ILI~{ 1~ ~ ~ i '~ T ~ m h 5 ~ ~ Vi _ I Q a ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~WWW ~~))yy~~~~~~JJ~~~~~~~~~ 11nn~ .zt~ . ... ire. .. ~_ ] tj I ~L ~ i ~1 1 ~11 ~ N .,+ U ^ ,1 1 1 1 ' 1 1ryr' `' 11''II'''Iy1''II' U 1111\InI11mm11V S s ~ OIiHINflBflillAlflkHM ~ s3 ~~ R IWWllWllIWllWi" ~~~~ ~ g ,~~~~»'.' C ' ~ e3 O ~ ,3 u i i ~~j~ IIWll ~"U ~ -~- --- ~ I171J ~~ 0 o E Q ~~ 4• ~a e- $y<'o, g p ~= z3~~ ~g~Q~ O~ 3 ' ~82~ ~9Si ~~pV • ~~ 232 ~ z N ° " ~ :8~ ~~?! f~ ~ S Qa ~ cae ~s~~?LLs~ Q ~. 2 _® ~ s ~ ~~?~t ~ 4 ~ ! ~ ! +o p ~ . ~ ~ f~,~~i~a 4~~ !' !' ? ~ 9?i° a - ~~! ! ! ? g ~ ! ~j ~ ~ ~ ° 8 l 1~ E tl l ai8e? H F ! .. .. ~ of ? ~8~~ -- ., ~ ! !!! o ~~ ® ~ O ~~ ,® _ ~ ~ i ~ ® yy9 fr~ ` ~ S ' " . ! ; ' ' x o 3 3 ? , ~ ~ g ~ ~ ,® i ~, ~ ! ~ 2Y 1 ~ 9 O q ~~ .O !? i?8 . ~ . ` ~~ ; %O O ~. . .. ` Lf J ~..~. ~ '~ $. ~ a ~ X ~ . ~ ? ! ----- ----------- - ----- I ~. ' . ' . . ' O~ ~~ ~ ii ~; ~~ ~~ i i I ! ~~ ~~, ! ~?6s ;• ~~a: ~ p. (ii ((` p 44II (]] 3! zW~ N ~- 1~~a °5! ~ F° w ~ al :9T! 3~i9 ~~$ N ! _ e ~ ~o~ , t _ _® e $3 .. «. .. -~ --~ ~-.a---~ --- -~n 0 G O 3 g g ij i r ii e: r liti ~ Ji .. !I i ..__ __ i:: !' i ~ ~ :i li . '0 ' i I! j'i •. ... is ' .s. :, is ,i - - - •! ! l i i it I ' i ~„ i I II '• j °i ;: i :: j i. ~~ ' i ; I ~ - ~~~ I I I =:-~ -=-:r r. ~ e I ' j j _ I i I !i i ~ a._- _ry a i is ! ~ ; t ~ , ~ '' ,. ~- E i ._..~ „.; i_~::.. ..._... ' I ' 8 II I ~) i ri i ~ I r- ' li i s E I P - s J h '~ i I c _ • ~ k _. ' ~ ~ !' ! ' I i "__..- ~i j i i _ s ~~ i -- ~ -.. : re G Ei i ' j , ! : ~i ~ R'- . i i i 11 I i i • ~ 'i ii ii i ____-., _ __._._ ... - i-r c-~,- ~-__ i 6 • 9o ' `I [} it {~ p! j ~ ~ u ~ : ci ~'i'ipya m 3 Q ;9 n ^j ~ ~i R ~}41 is ~~, a~ }' ,. i ~~t ~~ ~ o i~ ~ ^ o 6 F m a it ~ B~ !~ !~ a E0 e- ~. 7 ~ ~q a, 3 !} !~ el ~ RI ~ ~ '~ e s s t B ss I ~ ~1s 1E . ~ 1 ~~ i! l p pQ 1 g i IFf 77 t ::777 ; F ~ Q ~ . FF~ g O G '~ 1 ~ ~ e i ~i ~~~~ 9 O„ ; ff> a { W_ ~a i~$3 Sai U~ ~I s ~i€ ~;5.' ~~~ M q th ~ ~~ ~_ ~ I _..,.~~~..,.. a i' ~ ''~ 3 ; F V ~.Q ~~ ~a E gS E C ]~ ~<o: € t Y g ~- ~t6fi aaa ~- E $4g NNJ ~< 3a~p 9~~ Qn E : ~1 Y~~FE g~ 'l 9 e x p yy ;; ~i ~ a i ~4ppWi~~~pa to ~~ ~~5t '~~ B e ~ ~ a~7~~~W o ~ ~~~; 911 ~E $~l~~lfea ~ .._.._-.d..._____. _.._... ..... i -i ' O O Q i i ~j ` ~~~ 8 O '• ~; `"~,o ~,~, :_.....____~ U ,... A -4~-- _~. -8-~ --~ ~ ~ O g ~ ;, ~ ~ ~ ;; -_- =, b~'y i O a~ @l.f p-Q p-p O i e ~: ~ ~~ ~~ 6-b 6~0 ~ E 1 4 Ll' //VV// ;: f i 0.. 1 ~~ L~ ~ ~ ~ C it ~ ~ ~~ • ! ii '. d-b i ~ j -~tg' o ~~ ~' ~' ,.. ~~ i „ ;: ~. ~ ~ , v _ a ..._.-------~ e° O- - t ~U~ i `/ t~~~ 6 n ~ o a FF! [p ~ cNy N >! S W ° ~a -- _- ~i ~~ ~ !i - -- i_ u ?i ; ~ ~ ~i ;: a $ ;, . ~ • i ~ !~ 8 I j~ ii ~~ ii ~I ii ~e a i -6Y!' ~.- li _..._I~: \ IE f; - ~ ~ g .i L' _a~ ~ ?~ _a~ II ~ p U i~ I i L r g ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ a li / d 1 I• ~ ~ a s c ~ it i B i ~ i it r. r _ as n i~ ;; ~- ~- li I ~~ it ii =-~ ._:'-' °~ ~-- r, ` i .. - i ' S ~ - ~ l; .~ , I a • f{ g v ~~ , u ~, ~ltp efq ~ Fa >>°I ~ tto9 ~ ~S~ a n ~< ~ g 111 Q :- :@a 34~! °'~: Q iH t gg. ~~ tit 4~ . .~ 3 j ~~ ava p b y ~A tia ® ~ ' I i o ® ~ €~ i 8 u ~~ ~ ~ e~ ~ !~ { ~ 1 } ~ u5 4 7 ~ S '~ e dt t! s ~ S ~~1 ~- _ = e- ® ( ~_ l~~~ ~@[ /U/~~~~ g S ~e i =7i ~E3. Qua t7 ~. 4 ~`~• : O. a ~i~ M ~ a N 8 e Q e ~ ~ u 6 : ~ 33 •k s~ ~f~ ~~ :Q 40 ~a ~< , ~ 01 ~„ ff e V- ~b;~ IIE 1 ~_ ~E s ~~iel 3:11: ~~: `/ ar N ~: 1~Er vig ~ Q° g ~ d~ ~sll: ~~§ a ~: m 0p e £~ 3 3 a 6 '~ a~ ~ S !!!!!A' ~ C 5 ~ ~~agpY'~~E § 1 ¢ ea ee 34~~~.s~ 3 3? 'y 1 ! g e ~eia~'~~1 i ~ ggl9 ~ ~ _ ~~ ~itf" S 9 Q ~~; ~i ~ lepw ~~~ 8~'s~~9~~~~ MM ® ^^ 8 g a .. i '~ l 1 _ ~_ ~_ 0 _•_ Q ____ 0 __ O __ _f \, ~__ __ a_ _ __ _ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~8~ ~ ~ ~ o a ~ a G ,` i ~ y ~~ n . ' p ee_~,, i li E ` "'1 i !~ n' u__ _____ _ __a_ ~ y Q J 91 tl 0 0 ~ _ ______ ______ si ~t 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~QJ, VV (~~{J~, VU ( j Qj, (~j~j ((~j CTGJ < V J C 7 V ~ ~ ' ~01~ e. \~_ i _.._ s i I d{ ~ ( , (j ~j ~j ,~(, J KYV VC! ~ ` t ~lJ~ ~g i O4~ ~ ~ e VV VG CJ-CJ VGJ V-GJ i ~G. `. Y . ~ ` -T ~ ,~ ~a O G~ a~ ~ i' ,' ; j4 , ~ `~ O ~ I ' _~.....~~ 3 ....._. ~ a. O . i , ' ~ I (y~~^y (y^~~y •~~ OW W ~ ~~~ I ~ 1 I ~ ~ __ I ~ 6-O a' i QQ (YO i 0O ~ o { l . ~ i ! ~. `- ---------- -- - -- -- - -• I 1 I a I ~<o. ~ OX _ \/ a (J_ 1 I t f ~ ° ~3 I~ n n u u O n u n u • 1 _ _ ice? ~_______________ - ti w iJ I ~ i O o ~ ii ° i i' Jam- _ , $ ZS n j j~ li ~ II ~ iji Z m 11 p N a O 2 i t) /~ ljY II 1 L7 C. i1 i~ C ~ C I' I~ ~ _ ~, ~'- II - Q3 ~3 f -~_ II ~j II ~_ f'1 4 i~ II ~I n II 1~ ~j ,1 II 11 Y ~-- J~ n N y II ~i i~ t a c 1~ I~ c f ~ II Ll7 C ] Ji r~ c_~ [_y YC ~~ l//< ~. ® Q„ g r t~~ 3~~~ ~~~ f U. ~ s •li~ ~SSe l~b~a ~ gg~ 3: ~• ~ ~~.~ ~ 1 ~I~ ! I } .__-. 1 ~ ~ ® f~ ~g ~ ~ ~t ii ® _ e• i~~ ~ ~ @ s ; - - -- - R ! 6 3}!~ 3~ i 2~ ~< o Q„ }i 3 z° ~_ ~sl! ~~~ U~ ~I ~ ~ 3421 iisa-Q~i ~ C! ap i B"i'~ ~ ~° 9F1 a~Y ~ ~~ $ _ yy1EE ~<ur ~ ~< a E Qa _a 'CS 44~I ~ Wdz Q S c ~ C { ~< ~l~r ejE E Qo a ~ I pyre i ~3~ Q w a c!a ~ ~- e ( ea $9~E e ~£ ~~ p ~a t z i i ~ a ~~ i ~_ #~~~ ~y3Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : 9F1 3$~e z z3~ ~p N •`~` ~~~! p~~ Ida > - p~jpE' 9U0 ~ { ~ ~ 9 44 iE E ~ ~ ! ! 3 f ' ~ L ~ ~ ~ ! a t pp 6, ! ;~ E ! BptY~y~~j~a @ ~~@~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~~sEi" ~+ ~ , . F q ~3 7P ;~ ~lE1 ~A~y`~~~ l~3! ~ ~99 f/ i I i ~~~ ~! ~E~1~97~1~ e i a g 0 3 5 ~ Q •i a~ e~ i .. « ! ~ ~~ 1 i I -- - I}~ J (I ~ J E ~''"~ Q, 1~ b ~: i a ~ 5 i ......,.c ...3 ~- ~ i ~ iaf e y ~` i i ... .. n i ~ . ~ • > S ~ ' i c ~ ~ K y yy ~ ~ ~.` i3 . i 1 z xs ~~ r i i. f ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I I t S ~" IS=~ }}~ ~ OUP ~~ ; - :~e7 s:}.:~8 N _ ~~ ~ Q6 c$s ~4~d :~~ Q i Y~ Y B.gi e ~ ~ e ~~~~y'~~ ~' 6• g `a~$ l9H ~ ~c '~I` a :9a~ ~e1s 3~'~~ N S! II..ll yy ~. 11j~ X39 ~ : (W-a '6i 5 - yept ~ 8~4 ~I ~< ~ Qo £II _s [CO 44AE 7 3 Q ~ t m ~ `/ F ~io ua ~.~-v n ca o ii f - ~._._.: r.~ o:q a ql !I ;I ~ _ V .i ~i i II ~ ~ ~ ii i - II ii G {,~ ii :i ~i ii ~i J 9 is is ~I _ __ ____ _ i? C ;; :: ~ ~; s --~,~ _ ~~ n i ii 1 p~~ L if ~~ is ~ 6 -- :::y ~' Ssd~ !gyp ~c ~I s :B ;fie! 3:36' ~F~O ch jpt < ~< g Q ~ _ : as ~3~$ t < . 9y g : y ~ a S 9 t{ ~ttyHy df yIy E i p 16 ~ Z ~ 13E ~ - __- ~ i s y F Y aq _ _ _ s e.. t~ y{ qq s 19~p° 8J1 1R~ta ~a ~ { ~, y~tpE ~ ~~y=~m Q l ~ v a.: ~ e ~i a o t ~ C ,~. .. ( 9 ~ ~ i 113 i S e ~ a ~ ~ - H i S ~ O Z e ~ [ t l ~ `~ ! 1 t 1. f r+ ~ ~ g. @ ~a~~ e s ~ ~' s~ ~ 9 a ~s$~ ~ < g ¢ ~~ i c i ~. `~ i a C f c ~ i ~ ~ )3gy ~ ~~iAg p# ~ ~ ' ~ •a¢ { ~s i~ 9~ ~ 4 y 7d ~3° S ~ ~g 3g p A ~ ~~ !~ 2 F ' ps s ~~ ;{ j0]j3Yi/lips 3 B R g e ~ i ~ ~ e E ga ~ i !~ !a •9 dtf ~ 83 i8 4xpe9yapyrd~yes ~~ ~ ~ i~ d ~ f99 ~C3 u ~- `j' J s 1 Al ~, w I 4 ~ I 1 i I 3 i i ' f ~s ~ _ ~~; ,. 9~! i pp I O ~ i ~oa ~~ i . ~ 1 I ' ~, i i 2j .,. y _, 8~~~ j i 2 i i i i .~ i Vl ~- _ t y~~a, a ` p_ - p g ~- 553 }g~ # (~~ ~ a :71~ 3eis ~~~~ N ~/ li Fs, iY P ~" 4 ~_ $ 4 ®~ m ~ i ~~ `_- 7 i ;~ x d - o -~- a ii ii i r ii "g ii A ii J 6 - c ii ii u r.; ` , u N '°` '°' iii i::_.. __.._ k , r;i ' ,; _... ii _ r _ ;: - -- ' ~ ' a ii! ~ c .o. ,o. iii j -- -- - r y I ~„~ ° . _.._. + j"~~ . ~. _ G i _ j a..._._.., ii _ "d ii :5 ~. ~. i~ . ~ . ~ - i t -- r~~ ~~~~_~J i1 ~~ __ , ,. ~: a~gg ear Q¢ ~ a 2 'ea ~i~b ; ~~~ Q ~. r ` e o ~ i }~~ ~' € i a ~ o ~ ~ o m m o ~ o ~.~ ~ ~~~~ .. 6• 5 ( ~~~` a f S Q- e - ~~ 1qR ~ $o~ N t~~ 1,~9~ ~~'§ V~ ~b a ~~3 3yaiSips ~ ~~f~ M v ~9~} as~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~S ~~~ Q 2 ~• ~, f 0 fE ! ! j ~~ a ! ` 3 D a o ~ o ~ $ a 0 0 e ~~ 1~ :: E Q ~ee ~F~b ; ~ a 1 3 g u ~~~° ~: 3q ~~~~ 3Jp~ ~~~ 1 Qc $~ ° :i2~ 3ifa ~ ~~~i N ~: ~4j; 6~r ~ ~c al ~ :E ~ ~yt pg3~ Q i~ # 3 ~¢ n _ : na ~g~~ S ~ ~. g ®_ ~ m 8 ~ " '~ ~ ~ i.. ~ M ~- ,,, --~ -~-- ~'~ w w ;; ;~ _ _ _ a ._ _____c___Ti ____ __~. _.~ i 9 ~L - ~ ~ ~~:~_ ~~~, eg ~ i~~i 3 a 1 1 qq° 31Y ~ ~_ _~ 91 tlt! ° _ R 'kv3j 0 u i (~''] ~ ~t ~ ~R T . II ------ II f 1 6• ~i<O• ; O• ~` E Q {.. ~H}~ 1C~0 0 Z Z a f``,t ! F a ! :1 5 t sp ~L0L53~ Q " ;ee s3~8 a~ ~ ~ 1y ~ ~Y ~ j ' 4w 3 i i ~ ~ ~ i < < 0 3 z j gg !Z I ~ ' 92 ~ ~ • Ar ~ ~ i~ z o ~ R ~q ~2 2 ~~a ~ ~ ~ ~~o o- t • ] _ 3ji~~~ ~F§ tt U ~ ~ ~ E : ~4 ie{e . emu' `q~ N v~a i~°_ tsi ~ ~- a ~ ~3a 1~ era: ~ r ~ ~ o. a s $~ 49€ ~"` n :, (J ~ i! i ee :id ~~ AlFp ~ E ~ d/~ 8 - y eippk im~ Q _ ~: ~ ¢ ifia ~'~6: '~„ Q Q ~ Q Q 4 ~t I I I ~ ~ N i I 7 N ! 1 I ~ 1 ( I iy i ____ ... ...__. __. i , ~ ~_ q ~~ ~ •~ _• ~- 1•~ ~~_~~-S~~ -- 111: _ ~ J ' i .__ li i I,i i li 1 i i I~ $ i I ~i i ` 1 I{ ~ 1 I i 1 i ~ li i is ~ i , i ~ li i l 1 i ! li .I ~ }! _ , ~ap. I .. ~pe~ e i I 1: ii i~ ~ ea3 i I1 yyg i 1 s ~ ~{ ;~ e ! Q "^}y ! I F ;{{F I 1 ~ pp !B~lP Y ggg iI i I ~ F 1 i Ii g g ~8" SS E 9b it i 3 ~ ~ I i V~V {~a~~ 3 1 I ~ 9 L p 5 ~I 9 a ~ 1 ';--- - ~ la ---;~------ ; ! t9~c 5 ~ $ ~ ! 3 3 ~ 4 3 2 d~ ; 4 ' g ~ 4y $li~. ' ~ ! B ~ d ~ ~ 1 ~ • - li e @ _$i 6 ~~ ~ ice` •~ . ~i i ' .i ii - ii I ~ _ i I' i I~~ }~ 11 f9 1 is I ~ li ; ~~ ~ i 1: ~: is m - ---------!- ------------------------- .; 1: ` _ 1 i° ~ ~aF i i ; I? ii i li ~ ii i I I _ i I i I ii 1 f! li i li 1 I: I I i %•• ~~ I ~ li ii ! i' v i ~ i I ~ I ... .. .. ~ ~ ~~°~ O a~ ~. a ~ ( F 3 as ffp S o~9 r; ~t9 ~d$ ~ = Q 0 0 o ! ~ I Q ~ I ~ ~ i m ~j I ~ I I i i I I I I J.. Ei~. " I - o---_ __ _ _-_- _ _ -___-- - ____ ____- ~ ~_-_.___~ ) M1 I _ I I I ~I I 1 I v j ~ III I I P I I ------ - l~ 'l II II ,, ~~ ~- I ------- l I ~ ~ I jI --t -- I --- ~ T ( lll w i ' ~ ~ i ~ 'l - ~pQ ul ~ ~ ~ 6 o----- - I. li; ---;~;-----_ I ! ~-~------- i --------~ I Ij -----~ 1 I ~ ~ v ----- - ~ I I _ ' ' Y ° ~ it I ~ I I I n li ~ al i ~ 1 ~ ~~~ I ~ ~ ~ O-- 'I; l~ ----- I -~ - I I ---- ~ I ~ ~j; ~ ~ ~ I I I ! ; ~ I ~ -- ~; ~ I _ .; l I l ( ~ _ I - I ~ I ~ I ° ' ~ - +, !i!i Y yy t~_ oi a V e9~ sk apj _ °g~~ qY ~ s ~~ i ' s 8: e ~a ~ E y ~~ '~ ~ ~ ; ~j9 ~i . • • . • H • ~~ • • • ~ ~ • e • O 9 m $ • a e ~ ~ a • ~ < i o • • • • ~ y • • • ~ • • f • D • • • • Z ~ N • • • ~< e- I t ~~o. : ~ Q. _ 5I~ I l - ! 9 /v//11••...'~. ~8=8 tai Ue 61 S _4 :~S~~i~Ss ~~ ch ~lV ~4~Y a ~ ~- _°II ~ ~3 f~ ~< a 7 i 9 ' ~ m !I a• qq ~ ~` t V E ~. I I I - I r !~. 69& a ~ ~ <~ ~ a4~' ~ f ~a ">° y.e. :mow- ~ ` ~ Ig 1~1 _ . W 9 Q ~< ~ ~ d ~§ I ' G4 P?8~ ' m i~1 !! ,.~._ I is _~ - ,I ~ ~ i ~ $ j ~, ; ; ~ 9 3 _~ L '~3 ~ ~ V [.. g y ~ O .. Jjj~ ~ ~ I y r ~~ A4g§ Y ~ .; ~Q i ~~.~'P~I ~o I Uwp < ~ ~ ~ ~~' eI` ~ ~ ~ da kya$ ' ~ Q ~~ 2 ~i ~I AI 4 ~T~ ~~ < y l ~ ~I ~ ~I i u z 8 ~~ G z ~~ U ~ r k 'z I ~ I! 3 ~ ~ IF ~ ~ I e 3j~# ~Pk ~E ~ ~ 5 E ~ r.. si 3~ ~ 33}}pp 'n f7 ~< s ~ ~ •~ ~ ~I~ ~ I Ada 443d ' Q ~I ,~ ~, - ;~ ~ ~ F m ~ ~~ ~- i .n ~ ili ~ n) ~_ ~--=.. I b1. m 7~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ lu n 2 Z e o' b ~~~ '' = ~ I g > 3 , f v t a~ x ~ y ey . o , ~ p Fj 41 ~A (~~ ' ~ i C 3 Y ~ Y vim Q ' ' f L_^ 0 L s s ~VV {t @ 3a { n~F~F~i °au Q! ' ~ e; = ;So- 4Y7~ C d ~,~:~ , ~. ~< C t. Y 6: /O~I~ c . AEI ~ rt I ~ : -d~ ~S : Q ~_ SSk~ }~y9~ ~Y V~'~ _ ~~~I 3 'A~•S~ :~} iB{{O$@a : ~O~j Q ?~~~ _I :d4 ~< n ~ v ~ e ? ~ a `- e ~k s s ll 1 M1 11 ~ t ~ a L - ~ .-~ _ ~ Q -~ ~~ ~ L ~y~ _ , ~ ~~}.. ._ rl. ~ ~ ~ _ 4 ~tv == z F C ..ZF ] ~ _ g -_- s ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ I~ _ 1 F F } ~ } . ~ ~ ~ € y t ! iiv ~_ ` x~ M } l- S ~ e ; _ 4, s ~ < L ~ ~ z @4 ~ i~ ~ ; - 08 x "tea: ___..~ i ~ .. a a F, ~; > - ~ ~;~ x y e ! ~ k ~ ~ ~ y~ ~~ ~ } ed ~ ~ ~ ~ _ X13 ~ i ~ s z §3 . ~ ~ ~~ z R.+ ~ a4i4 € ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s~3 '!d? } ; ~ ~ i ~ ~~ Y l i a .. I, W ~ ~ ~ ~• W ~ ~ `n R. _ -- --' F ~----- R I$~ I- s $i s i, I i~ $~: ~~ •-~j II s O - ~i~~ p~n ~. v o ~ ~ a~- Z ~r A9 5 ~ ~/" ~~ ~ ~~ ~ U _ ae° U2 J ~< ~ ~ ;~~g~ ~ :~a 6~~~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 of ~ ~Z ~ ~~~ ~~ Z 3~~ IIJS ~~ 0~ ~g ~~~ ib ~~ i ~ ~a ~~~ 3~ _., . s - Qu W~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~"~~~~~vo ggg5 yy`` r I1.~~~SYI~LS~w ?~wi `5k~5>5~ $~ ~ o ~ ~ Y 4 x; ,; ~° ~~ '<~ a .~ _ ~~~ 5 P .~~ y~z ~~r ~ g~ 8 i~ Y 5D~ c7 ~- ~ i~^~ i t >~' a ;3 f:se yi Fb ,. f .~ z~ .~ 3, L a w 4 V O Z J `a w U U g rj I n II~~ 1. .. E~ III I -_ :',~ lOl I11 + II I rr aA !~ ~E BAH ~Si~ Y e eia i e E26 t a 3 ,~ f ]~~r ::. ~ l g~}, ~ ~ ~rJ Bf C~ t ~~.:gig. Sgs 1$xc 3~~~~~~5 n:~ v- 9 ' i ~a~~s ~~$p~i~. u ~'~9 0000 ~ m 0 @~! ~a Ei ~ ~ ~~s o e .~~~ Q .~ ~~ ~ pp -a ~ --- 4 e i s ~ ® AS ~a Y~i p ~ ?~ ~ ~x `~ Ba ~ E f S3 s +i a= # ~ r~s6' a~9 ; ev P?63 S;y.y ao C Y Y 3 E^y f k'Y€::~Y~~Q S s¢EF n n rll i5n"9E ~ ipip ;i8e ~B."'~~`-7 .:E ~~~f u ~ y~lli 4 ~°=§y~seE.: i s a} Etl4v~q•~~ ~ i:: eeE E E ei ~Iyy'~1~9@I!'~65tl x ~$$$$e "~E4 Yb~~. "~ E t M JIGrd raE~ ~~[~ ~6~3 ~~~y~ :LyaB 9 $Y_ 2 ~f. ~~ ~AS 3 i ^ g Rt ~ 1 ~41i ~i~.€~ ~a I ~.i:' E ~ ~,~„ ~ a ~ i i "~ e ~ ( i .( aj ~~~eLE yy e f 1F Yla • ~ cby~F.~~ tE a ,,,~ ~ °t d s ~1'}I~i ~~EERS3l •"g~3~u ~yy~t~ ~ ~ ~~III Qg~gYe~! k EE ° C - i3~2 ie 1 ;i~61`1 oFagit x ~~~ ~ i ~yj\ T ° 1• I I; ae aiY ~ Yeg Y $ ~0 I~\ ~,.s>~n.+~ r I . I I r Q M E ~~i~i F~~3 111 t h e ~'i i _rhli~ P §7ds§~~ 'o e~. ee i',.:, r ~ -' ai ".I eiiEaEiEf= aam s> f ~'S ^~~~ t`r I~ gg / i ~ ~ v ~ r i Gqq~~'~ ¢g i ~Y ; rS~ 3Y ~ e- Ce 1 ~ i[.a n~ i @y ~~ I' .., V $ iB 5 E OOE6~e • (~t~$ sii d ~i363 qR E- Y ~E P #e 2 3 ~1i36 Gdo~' ~ .C i~e !/ ! ~~~d i QE! v ~ ~nr 1 .g i ~ > II B~nC I 1 III ~ r - ~5i ` 1 f ~ S ihA r ~ Q.~ Et ~ a; {'I7r x I~E g[~~ .~• . _ s ! = ~ ~ ~ f;L. a E~ ' ~i E 7 4 iiLi~; § 44 a TMIJt KKhn ~~wnulws~adn~nMp~gpnJ•ssemRA.~.y~.x s fV Z y ' V V a t z • ~ I C'-s y e ~ _._ t ~. e e e m.~~T" ~a!f dnT T _ ,d~' 1 r a ~~~ :, ss}} W yy Y. ~ h C !- D}Q O.~ €F~ Q { ..i 4 ~~~SQk Y ~~~~4~ i :.; : . . i - d~' A~ p 1{1 I :.~ i~l~ ~'~ 1 L C _ ~ qq OF .. 1 . ~ ofgy~ ' ~ ;+ p . ~ :=, !~ •, ~,' ~ ~ f ti /._t RLIj ~ ~ I Y 1 I i ~ cl _ ~ i ~ " b ~ ~S ~ if~ei i Ww._ ~ ~ t-~ R -~ ~. tti~ ~ M I II Yy ~ .~~. ~: _ 1 ~- Z i sii a ~.': l<:.. ~ i ~ qq Y• 3 a 5j W i i r ~ .. ~ }y _ ~ i f p~. ~ ~/~~. _ ~ e ~ E ~ k r6 ° !E yA °v $ it a;~ •. U 4 e ~ a n1. ~q'6 b I ^ is ~ ..: ~` ~,,' I <' -i , s r.!r ~e~ 9 ~g~ ~[a A _\ ~ oaf S ~~~ di$ v c°i~ x ~ ~~ m ~ F r u `i ~ i i a ~ __ '.. ( ;. . a i 0 ~ ¢ ~ ~~ 4 ~ k lo i ' ~ I+ _ ~ ' ~ . !i - ,._ _, _ ~....~ m ,p 4 _.._ G I i. 3 A ~ ®@ ii ~ - ' .I ~ P~ ~ i 9 s ~ - - ~. f ~\ ~ 3 ,;! < °+ 7 E :~ l [ ~ ~Zf I C~" 6~3 s t ' ~ j(( (l °o! j~~ i I 'yp V'IRO~AI~L H,Lf1036L2I8 4ZIE£-9TIZE ~~~ 3~,L2NIIbQt~H HO1~I'IIVA ~ J HHHNHIMIHNNHHN9 ~Rf1i~ `~ ~~ ONHIHNHNHH+HHNN ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ '\ t f ~ n ~ O © O .~ U 3 O 3 .~ ~ -~VE~O~dl1flI9 'VD V'lll~s ~LL10ii*8*~~8L E8 98i88.9TIE8 ~ n 11-1~ ~A y Z l7 j .-. ti Z U J ~ Z 2 z ¢ --~ ~ L7 H ¢ Z Z ~ N 4 W ~ ~ to ~ ~ J En W ~ w W ~7 3 vi ~ ~, z z ~ z ^ ~ V J W H J W ^ A ~" ~ ~ J F- N J F-- ~ Q Z 3 ~ ~ 3 3 = aJa ~`°Z. h~ ©~O~©OO a ~L ~ ----' f ~ Ii Ii J~--------- f' ,~ ~ '- II I1 ~ ! Z ~' ' ~ ~ ~, i Y ~. i a ~.~~ ~ `, ._ o ~ ~ , ~ N ~ ~~ ~ i ~ a e .a o i Z m 0. < ~ ` ~I, ~ c ~~I ~ _ ~k O h QA _- ~~~ ~ O ~yl/ L an vv~ na a ua ~ m nn ~. w ~ b ,s o ~ o ^ , a ,~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~. ~~ ' j ,~, U N Q Z X O ~ ~3~ Z Q w w O Z z N W W Z LL aZ ~~ xz irv S C M Z Q J w w W ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ G ~ J J ~ o m Z Q w W ~ ~+ N = Z ~ ~ 0 ~ m Q l7 V N Q 3 0 W F Z a o _ X iv .. -r n 1 ~ iQ .~ fp :Q O ry 0 2 x ~ ~3~ W N ~ ~ ~ = O i Y -' m ~ > m z u_ C 1 )Z >~ :~ L r ~-~ •: Z z OC ~ z Q a' 5 ~, a o m ~ ? ~ ~ W ° ~ Z ~ Z~ m Q ~ y W u ,~ O _ ~ W 3 ~ m 9 :.- - w ~ Q ~, - _: 0 o~ W W F~ aC Z D d Q NO x0 co 3 Z l7 Z l7 V1 O W H Z a co x o W H O 2 v- L7 w ~ p ~ w Q J m {~ Q V g' to ~~ W ~ ~~ zp aQ `a p "~ O Z x O l7 ~ 3 ~ n O~ z N ^~s V 3 0 a N_ X a O O O 3 oN W ~w ?o z aQ z ~ v+ v o aN ;,~ 0 x3~ a ~a 1 ~ N N M 0 ~ n 1 ~ Z W 0 ~ W m z Z N S a 0 5 Y~ 4 z 3 Wy z ~~ C~ 3 ~ .9.~ rz 6~ oW W~ __ G ~"' G3 ~5~ ~ ~~ ~ l" .l t-~L ~ l l . ~S ~~~ l r~c ~ •VJ ~7f1~,L Ed+AO$ 6L 8B 98ISB•9ii88 88~Lfl9II8QVS$ g~H~j `Il~A s~~ L W < Z § 3 C 7 x _ a ~~ ~ ~ N .r- v~ vzn~ asnoe ec ~ yes-stt~ B~,LflvABQV$H EJi1Vg'II~11 I b 0 ~3 N3 +0 s 0 ~~ Z O ~n W Q z = o¢~Z W = I~ N F„ S K 3 7 6 2 pW ~ W 1~ ~W¢4I W F V 12 ~ _ _ l~ K 6 J ~ J W -1- 0 ~o .n 2 c~ z a= ~~ ~~ 9D@ ~o J N F J W ~ Z W <O C J >J O 1 th 3 N 2 J Q FW W w D D Q W m J 2 H Z H J 2 W O W Q W Jm J a x ~~ CV 'VJ V'Il1~~8Z EJIn08 8L 89 98[88.9TT86 sessavn8m-~ Hal~8 OVA W ~~ 4~ IN 1~ F 1 Z ~ ~ ~U ~ LL O S E~ T~_ i 1 TO M ~~ o~ a J ~<~ r 3~ W = F~ _ ~ OC O~Y~ 2p QZ W ICJ J o[ QCQ ~~,IZ ~ f ¢¢ Q ~ ? hv~i3a u7 ~Z :~ '~ HZ[1086L'8g 98T68-9TT88 es~senbav~ HOt~''IIVA 4 x h tii „~ ~QQQ ~~~ M~~ U a z J z O V 0 t/~ a c~ n~ S M 'YJ V7~,L HZIIOB 6L ~ 98I88~4TT~ I I I I I ~ ea~~avnbav~ HOi~ ~'A 4 z a a v °z~ r as _ W 0 O ~~ Z Q G ^ _ `ZJ ]y[ F ew 3 ~~+d3 'Z V t/) W Q u M m YQVg#)08d IZpIB 'd'J V'IA~~J, Hi[11088LSB 9~T86-9tTZ8 ~ BNSZS9IIbQVSH HOI~'II~A 3 0 Q8 2 e W ~~~ ~ ze r 2 d _W O QQ a ~Q ~~ N C C L~ 1 N J g.~ ~ .~ Q 1' ~~N ,, ~ Z (~~~ ,O o O S 1= ' ti? u U II _ r> 0 u9 ~~7~ u9 x~Kr 0 `bD ~_ )- '9J V7n~S,L HS[lOB 8,6 8B 98T88r9TT88 sassavnbav~ HOl~'IIHA v ~ z t k° a ~~~ ~~~~~ zr c~ Z ~ ~~ ~' Z ~U z z~ ~ _~ ~~~a ~~~~~ Z 3~~00~ N ~ 0 ~ w Q a~ ~ U ~~ Q ~ g~~ _~ ~s~ ~. I m p O O~~ ~~~ ~~m °o ~VaV O a d ~ W ~ m ~ ~ O Z ~~o~ ~~o~ ~~~~~ t~ I I I I I °° W V z w a~ ~~ .,, a° ~~ ~~ sassaeabavsH HOHVB'IIt~A ~"~"~ ~~`~ ~~~`j~ I i l l l ~- z c~ h W 3 O ~I •~ 3 ~ O 'v'J v'III~L ~L(108 6L SB 9$i88.9ii88 s~aen~g Hat~'g'IIXA~ W Q LL !~ O Q = J ~ V ~ W = W ~" ~ m ~ i~ Z ~ J Z s~~ ~ ,00~ _ oho V ~~~ J ~m Q ~°-o ~ °~o `_ ~ U a U ne a ~~m4 ~ ~~oZ o o ~Z O ~~~~ a r~ 5 zs~ ? ~. ~, a ~~ 3 w a o H W 3 I~ ~''. 1 VAIL RANCH HEADQUARTERS SIGNAGE PROGRAM Final Aaaroved on Mav .2008 The intent of these sign criteria is to achieve visually coordinated and appealing signage that allows the creative expression of individual tenants and enhances the unique architecture of the Vail Ranch property. The Ownerwould like to re-create the characteristics of the buildings and the property as it once was. Originally built in late 1800's through 1920's, the property was known as the Vail Ranch Headquarters. The sign program was written to encourage the tenants to replicate signs of the late 1800's to 1920's. ' GENERAL PROCEDURES Prior to applying for City of Temecula approvals or permits, each tenant shall submit to the Owner for written approval, three(3) copies of the shop drawings indicating the location, size, layout, color, materials, and dimensions of the proposed sign, including all lettering, graphics, means of attachment, illumination, electrical specifications, and all other details of construction. One sign elevation shall be submitted in color. Tenant needs to provide a sample board. It is recommended that Tenant send a color concept drawing first for conceptual approval prior to making the complete submission for approval. Sign drawings shall be sent to: Vail Headquarters LLC Care of: Arteoo Partners Inc. 281 S. Thomas St. Suite 504 Pomona, CA 91766 info@artecoparmers.com The preferred method of delivery is PDF files via electronic mail. In the event that the shop drawings. are denied, Tenant must re-summit plans until Owner's approval is obtained. 2. Subsequent to approval by the Owner, the tenant shall submit a Design Review Application, signed by the Owner, along with the required number of sign drawings and any other submittal requirements required by the Owner and/or the City of Temecula, to the City of Temecula for review and approval. 3. The tenant shall obtain all necessary building permits from the City of Temecula. No sign construction or fabrication shall begin prior to approval of the subject sign(s) by the City of Temecula. 4. The tenant shall pay for all City of Temecula design review fees as well as the sign construction, installation (including labor and material), and maintenance. 5. The tenant shall be responsible for fulfillment of all requirements of these sign criteria. 6. Owner shall be notified at least 48 hours in advance prior to sign installation. G:1Plannirg12008WA08-0021 Vail Ranch Headquarters Sign ProglPlanninglVall Ranch Sign Program FINAL 4-7-08 Submitted W City REVISED AS PER APPROVED BY APPLICANT ON EMAIL APRIL 29.doc 1 GENERAL SIGN SPECIFICATIONS . 1. Sign design and fabrication for all signs shall be of the highest quality prepazed by a professional sign designer/contractor or qualified artist. All Sign Contractors must be fully insured. Owner must receive the Sign Contractor's Certificate of insurance prior to installation. 2. One exterior building wall hung sign (and one blade sign if shown on site plan) shall be allowed for each tenant. Comer tenants facing the interior of the site and main parking lot shall be allowed an additional wall hung sign (and one blade sign if shown on the site plan) only as permitted by the Owner and the City of Temecula to meet the intent of this sign program. 3. The location of all signs shall be per the accompanying design criteria. 4. All signs and their installation shall comply with the codes and regulations of the Gity of Temecula. 5. All illumination of Tenant signs shall be from exterior sources, such as flood or spot lights, rather than from interior illumination, neon, LED, or other such similar lighting source. 6. All penetrations of the building facade required for sign installation shall be sealed in a watertight condition and shall be patched to match the adjacent fmish. 7. Performance of the sign criteria shall be enforced. Upon demand by the Owner or the Ciry of Temecula, the tenant or the individual sign contractor, at their expense, shall remove any non- conforming, un-permitted, or un-approved signs. 8. For purposes of store identification, tenant will be permitted to place upon each entrance to its demised premises not more than 144 square inches of decal application lettering not to exceed two inches {2") in height, including business hours, emergency telephone numbers, etc. 9. Any decal, stickers, adhesive vinyl, or other similar application, except as required by a public agency, such as building or fire department, (which shall be required to be adhered to the inside of storefront or window glass, unless the public agency mandates exterior installation) aze expressly prohibited. 10. The Colors utilized for Tenant signs shall be from the Sherwin Williams Exterior Color Preservation Palette or a comparable color. Deviation from this color palette must be approved by Landlord and/or City of Temecula. Notwithstanding, corporate regional and national tenants with trademark logos and copy styles shall be permitted their corporate colors and graphics,. but aze required to adapt their signs in conformance to the sign criteria of the Center. 11. Surface Mounted and/or Wall Hung-signage shall not exceed 1 square foot per linear foot of tenant frontage; or facade frontage, whichever is less. All signs shall be in proportion and scaie with the building elevation and building entry as deemed acceptable by the Landlord and the City of Temecula. G:Wlanning12008WA08-0021 Vail Ranch Headquarters Sign ProglPlanninglVail Ranch Sign Program FINAL 47-oB Submitted to (Sty REVISED AS PER APPROVED 8Y APPLICANT ON EMAIL APRIL 29.doc 2 MONiJMENT SIGNS Landlord shall supervise and manage the design and installation of all on-site and off-site monument signs. Tenants shall reimburse Landlord for its pro-rata share (based upon the Tenant's gross square footage as a percentage of the total gross square footage of the Center) of the cost of design and installation of all Monument signage that contains Tenant's name. Tenant shall reimburse Landlord within five (5) business days of receipt of invoice. Tenant may not opt out of any signage, nor contest the design or costs associated with any signage which Landlord designates for Tenant's usage. Prior to construction of monument signs, provide notarized authorization from the property owner where proposed Redhawk Parkway and Temecula Parkway monumentation is permitted per the sign program. Monumentation shall meet the requirements of City of Temecula Development Code for landscaping. The Highway Monument (depicted along Temecula Pazkway) and the Directional Sign (depicted along Redhawk Parkway) shall be the only two monuments located along Redhawk Parkway and Temecula Parkway pursuant to this sign program. AlI monument signs shall be constructed of rough hewn or sandblasted wooden construction with a granite block base. Any center identification (ie, Vail Ranch Headquarters) shall be painted raised (not flat) lettering on rough hewn or sandblasted wooden planks. The wooden architecture of all monumentation shall be stained to match each other and as approvgd by the City of Temecula Planning Director. Wolf Store Road Monument Signs: Tenants of the Center may have their business name on each of the two monument signs facing Wolfe Store Road. The size, location, and font of business names shall be determined solely by Landlord and approved by the City of Temecula. All tenant monument panels shall provide a rough hewn naturally stained wood background (to match the stain of the wooden architecture of the monument signs as approved by the City of Temecula Planning Director) with painted raised lettering. The wood stain on the rough hewn panels shall match the wood stain of the wooden monument architecture and the painted raised lettering shall be from the Sherwin Williams exterior palette preservation. One panel. on each of the two monument signs shall be reserved for Historic Display exhibits. Temecula Parkway Monument Sign: Only a limited number of Anchor Tenants shall be allowed signage on ttte (I) monument sign to be located on Temecula Parkway, or other tenants as allowed by the Landlord. Anchor Tenants shall generally be those Tenants whose squaze footage exceeds 4,000 square feet: The selection of Tenants and the size, location, and font of business names shall be determined solely by Landlord. The Temecula Parkway Monument Sign is subject to approval of the Owner of Redhawk Towne Center and the City of Temecula. One panel shall be reserved for Vail Ranch Museum Display. All tenant panels shall be laser cut channel letters. A-FRAME AND ML3V[T BOARDS .One A-Frame or Menu Boazd shall be permitted per business, and shall be no lazger than 3.5 feet high and 2 feet wide. The A-Frame or menu board shall be placed on private property in a manner that does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The location of said Board shall be subject to the approval of Landlord and the City of Temecula, and either entity may rescind approval or re- G:\Planning\20081PA08-0021 Vaii Ranch Headquarters Sign Prog\PlanninglVail Ranch Sign Program PINAL 4.7.08 Submitted to Gty REVISED AS PER APPROVED BY APPLICANT ON EMAIL APRIL 29.doc 3 locate said A-Frame or Menu Board. The A-Frame or menu board shall be of wood constriction or famished metal and may have slate or other natural writing surfaces for purposes of displaying special menu or sales items. WINDOW DECALS OR INTERIOR MOUNTED SIGNS - 1. Tenants shall be allowed one window sign OR interior mounted sign visible through the storefront and located within 5 feet of the storefront window. Only gold leaf and paint aze permitted as materials for window signs. 2. The "net sign area" covered by the window painted sign or interior window mounted sign shall not exceed 15% of the gross window azea of the storefront or door glass as measured in squaze feet. No decals shall be affixed to historic windows. 3. Size, font and logo shall be reviewed and approved by Owner and the City of Temecula. 4. Logos shall be defined as a "letter" or "symbol" used to represent an entire word and shall be counted as part of the allowable sign area. 5. Interior mounted signs may be constructed of wood, metal, glass (sandblasted or etched), porcelain enamel, decorative ironwork, tile, or other high quality materials. TENANTS SHALL BE PERMTTTED DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, EXTERIOR SURFACE MOUNTED, BLADE SIGNS IN THEIIl; NUMBER AND LOCATION AS SPECIFIED IN THE ATTACHED ELEVATIONS AND STTE PLANS. POST MOUNTED DHECTIONAL SIGNS I. Directional signs shall conform to the size and location and construction standards and materials as established in the attached illustrated elevations of the approved sign program. 2. All signage text shall be painted. The "field area" of the sign shall remain wood stained may be painted or unpainted. Permitted text may include the business name, business logo, motto or catch phrase, and hours of operation. 3. Tenants are encouraged to replicate the sign styles of vintage signs from 1850's to 1940's while still maintaining their own identities. EXTERIOR SURFACE MOUNTED AND WALL HUNG SIGNS 4. Exterior surface mounted and wall hung signs shall conform to the size and location standazds as established in the attached illustrated elevations of the approved sign program. 5. Exterior surface mounted. signs may be constructed of metal or wood; although wood is the preferred materials. The wood should bewood-planking rough-hewn rather than plywood, and may be of carved or sand blasted wood if made with good craftsmanship. Metal should be famished or artificially aged, rather than polished or shiny. The "field azea" of a wood or metal sign may be painted or unpainted. Any attachments to the sign shall be of wood or metal with a cleaz sealer post-rust or similar aged patina. G:1Planning~2008WA08-0021 Vail Ranch HeadquaAers Sign ProglPlanningwail Ranch Sign Program FINAL 4-7-0a Suhmitted to City REVISED AS PER APPROVED BY APPLICANT ON EMAIC APRIL 29.dac 4 6. Tenants are encouraged to replicate the sign styles of vintage signs from 1850's to 1940's while still maintaining their own identities. 7. Tenants may propose alternative shapes and configurations so long as the total square footage of the signage does not exceed that which is contained in the sign program or allowable by the codes of the Ciry of Temecula. Surface Mounted and/or Wal] Hung-signage shall not exceed 1 square foot per lineaz foot of tenant frontage; or fagade frontage, whichever is less. All signs shall be in proportion and scale with the building elevation and building entry. 8. signage for the Machine Bam may be painted directly on the stnicture as approved by the Landlord and City of Temecula and only in the location and total square footage as shown on the west elevation of the Machine Barn illustrated within this sign program BLADE SIGNS 1. Tenants are encouraged to express their unique identities through apedestrian-oriented blade sign. Each tenant shall submit to the Owner detailed drawings of the proposed blade sign, indicating conformance with the blade sign criteria. 2. Blade sign size shall fit within a thirty inch (30")diameter area. Signs shall be double-sided and weigh no more than 10 pounds. 3. Blade sign shapes should be rectangular, but other shapes may be proposed and approved by Landlord and the City of Temecula. . 4. Blade signs may be constructed of metal or wood, although wood is the preferred materials. The wood should be wood_planking or rough-hewn rather than plywood, and may be carved or sandblasted. The wood may be painted or unpainted. Attachments to the blade sign holder may be hooks or chain with an aged patina. Any painted, plastic or rope suspension is not permitted. Blade signs shall maintain a minimum of 7 feet vertical clearance from the walking grade. 5. Tenants are encouraged to replicate the sign styles of vintage signs from 1850's to 1940's (see attached samples), while still maintaining their own identities. PROHIBITED SIGNS All signs prohibited in the Old Town Specific Plan and prohibited in the City of Temecula Development Code. 2. Signs constituting traffic hazard. No person shall maintain or cause to be installed or maintained' any sign which simulates in size, color, lettering, or design a traffic sign or signal, or which makes use of the words "STOP"; "LOOK", "DANGER", or any words, phrases; symbols, or characters in such a rpanner to interfere with, mislead, or confuse traffic. 3. Immoral or unlawful advertising. It shall be unlawful for any person to exhibit, post, or display any sign of anything of an obscene, indecent, or immoral nature or unlawful activity. 4. No window sign shall be permitted except as noted herein. No sign shall be installed, relocated, or maintained so as to prevent unobstructed ingress or egress from any door. No sign of any kind G:1Planning~2008\PA08.0021 Vail Ranch Headquarters Sign Prop\Planning\Vail Ranch Sign Program FINAL 4-7-09 Suhmitted fa City REVISED AS PER APPROVED BY APPLICANT ON EMAIL APRIL 29.doc 5 shall be attached to any fire suppression equipment, sprinkler or standpipe except those required by code or ordinance. 5. Animated, audible, or moving signs. No sign shall consist of any moving, swinging, rotating, flashing, blinking, fluctuation, neon or otherwise animated lights. 6. Vehicle signs. No signs shall be affixed to any buck, automobile, trailer, or other vehicles, parked on public or private property, that advertises, identifies, or provides direction to a use or activity, and is not related to the lawful delivery of sales or merchandise, or rendering of services from such vehicle. 7. Light bulb strings and exposed neon, LED, or other lit tubing. External displays, other than temporary decorative holiday lighting or other approved signage is prohibited Temporary holiday lighting shall be removed within 3 business days following a holiday. Banners; pennants, inflatable signs, and A-frame signs (other than those specifically permitted) used for advertising or identification purposes. 9. Decal, stickers, adhesive vinyl, or other similar application, except as specifically required by a public agency, such as building or fire department. 10. Illuminated or Neon signs stating "open" or "closed" or otherwise advertising hours of operation. 11. Any "store-purchased" or "off-the-shelf' plastic or metal signage visible from the exterior that advertises open closed, hours of operation, no solicitors, or any such similaz information. ADDITIONAL SIGN GUIDELINES Si¢n Tvpe and Message ^ Provide a clear message on the sign. ^ Use a brief message. The fewer the words, the more effective the sign. A sign with a brief, succinct message is simpler and faster to read, looks cleaner and is more attractive. ^ Avoid hard to read, overly intricate typefaces. These typefaces are difficult to read -and reduce the sign's ability to communicate. ^ Avoid faddish and bizarre typefaces. Western style typefaces that are easy ko read are preferred. Ufillze 9mple serif or san serif afpnaDef t r Avoid comY alPhabels ta~C-''JF~ ]]T~~~ ~~~7~ Dlseauroge typefaces which are hard fo reatl 0:1Planningl2008WA0a-0021 Vail Ranch Headquarters Sign ProglPlanningwail Ranch Sign Program FINAL 4-7.0a Submitted to Gty REVISED AS PER APPROVED BY APPLICANT ON EMAIL APRIL 29.dac _ 6 ^ Avoid signs with strange shapes. Signs that are unnecessarily narrow, oddly shaped, or unrelated to the products or services being provided on site can restrict the legibility of the message. If an unusual shape is not symbolic, it is probably confusing. ^ Use widely recognized logo's rather than prinUtext whenever possible. ^ Signs with phone numbers are not permitted. This can clutter and obscure the main message. Sien Color ^ Sign colors and materials should be elements that were available in the 1890'S. ^ Colors should be selected to contribute to legibility and design integrity. Even the most cazefully thought out sign may be unattractive and a poor communicator because of poor color selection. ^ Use significant contrast between the background and letter or symbol colors. If there is little contrast between the brightness or hue of the. message of a sign and its background, it will be difficult to read. ^ Limit major colors to four on a single sign, except for logos. Too many colors. overwhelm the basic function of communication. The colors compete with content for the viewer's attention. Limited use of the accent colors can increase legibility, while large azeas of competing colors tend to confuse and disturb. ^ Where pictorial artwork is used in a design, multiple colors may be used for that portion of the sign. ^ Metal sign panels can utilize raised lettering on metal bands. Printing and lettering can also be applied directly to a flat metal sign band with letters consisting of wood, acrylic or metal. ^ Colors used in registered corporate logos and trademarks should be matched to the closest tones of the Sherwin-Williams preservation Palette when possible. Sign Letter Size Guideline ^ Sign lettering for wall mounted signs should be large enough-to read, however, they should not overpower the scale, of the storefront. Sign lettering should meet the . following size requirements: • For storefronts 30' wide or less, a maximum letter height of 8' ; • For storefronts 30' to 60' wide, a maximum letter height of 12"; • For storefronts greater than 60' wide, a maximum letter height of 16". S1En Architectural Comaatibility ^ Sign design should relate to and enhance building architecture. G:1Planning520085PA08-0021 Vail Ranch Headquarters Sign ProglPlanning\Vail Ranch Sign Program FINAL 4-7-08 Submitted to City REVISED AS PER APPROVED BY APPLICANT ON EMAIL APRIL 29.dw ^ Sign size should be proportionate. The size and shape of a sign should be proportionate with the scale of the structure and as approved by the landlord and the City of Temecula. ^ Place signs consistent with the proportions of scale of building elements within the facade. Within a building facade, the sign may be placed in different areas. A particular sign may fit well on a plain wall area, but would overpower the finer scale and proportion of the lower storefront. A sign appropriate near the building entry may look tiny and out of place above the ground level. ^ Place wall signs to establish facade rhythm, scale and proportion where facade rhythm doesn't exist. In many buildings that have a monolithic or plain facade, signs can establish or continue appropriate design rhythm, scale, and proportion. Wall Mounted Siens ^ Sign colors should be compatible with the building's color and the building. tt The identification of each building or store's address in six inch high numbers over the main entry doorway or within ten feet of the main entry. G:1Plannirn~120081PA08.0021 Vail Ranch Headquarters Sign Pmg\Planning\Vail Ranch Sign Program FINAL 47-08 Submitted to City REVISED AS PER APPROVED BY APPLICANT ON EMAIL APRIL 29.doc 8 PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBERS PA07-0239 AND PA07-0240, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CERTIFICATE OF HISTORIC APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE HISTORIC VAIL RANCH HEADQUARTERS COMPLEX. PROJECT PROPOSES ADAPTIVE RE-USE OF SIX HISTORIC STRUCTURES TOTALING 13,390 SQUARE FEET (AND 13,738 SQUARE FEET OF HISTORICALLY APPROPRIATE NEW CONSTRUCTION) FOR RETAIL/OFFICE, RESTAURANT AND MUSEUM DISPLAY USES ON FOUR ACRES WITHIN THE VAIL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN ZONED HISTORIC COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT 32115-32125 TEMECULA PARKWAY (APN 960-010-044) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On August 20, 2007, Jerry Tessier of Arteco Partners, filed Planning Application No. PA07-0239 and PA07-0240, a Development Plan and Certificate of Historic Appropriateness in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on April 14, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May, 7, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07-0239 and PA07-0240 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Code Section 17.05.010.E -Development Plan A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City; The proposal is consistent with the Highway Tourist development standards of the Development Code and Highway Tourist land use designation and policies reflected for the City of Temecula General Plan. All development standards and general policies have been reviewed and the project, as conditioned, is consistent with the use regulations outlined within the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the Development Code and also complies with all applicable Building, Fire and City Municipal Codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing Vail Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines and the Highway Tourist development standards in the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regard to circulation, architectural design, and site plan design. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Old Town Specific Plan Section V. F.7 -Certificate of Historic Appropriateness A. The proposed structure is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City and is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The proposed restoration of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex is consistent with the Vail Ranch Specific Plan, the Highway Tourist zone development standards of the Development Code and the Highway Tourist land use designation and policies reflected in the City of Temecula General Plan. All development standards and general policies have been reviewed and the project, as conditioned, is consistent with the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the Development Code. The project also complies with all applicable Building, Fire and City Municipal Codes and has been adequately conditioned to protect and presence the public health, safety and general welfare. B. The proposed structure is in conformance with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan, including the goals, objectives and policies, and architectural guidelines and standards; The Vai! Ranch Headquarters Complex is located within the Vail Ranch Specific Plan; however, it is also within the boundaries of the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District as defined within Section V.8 of the Old Town Specific Plan. The paint colors, rehabilitation, additions and site improvements are proposed in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. In addition, the proposed restoration of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters have been reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board, the Riverside County Historic Commission, Vail Ranch Restoration Association and this local Historic Society and the project has been determined as historically appropriate modifications in conformance with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan (relative to historic appropriateness requirements) and the Vail Ranch Specific Plan including the goals, objectives and policies, and architectural guidelines and standards. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan and Certificate of Historic Appropriateness: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32 In-Fill Development). Class 32 consists of projects characterized as In-fill Development meeting the conditions described below: 1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project for the restoration of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex is consistent with the Highway Tourist land use designation. The General Plan Highway Tourist designation includes retail, office and restaurant uses. The project is consistent with all applicable General Plan policies and with all applicable zoning designation regulations and standards contained within the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the Development Code including the development standards within the Highway Tourist zoning district and all applicable requirements for lot coverage, building setbacks, floor area ratio, landscape requirements and parking requirements for projects in the Highway Tourist zone. 2. The proposed project occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The proposed project for restoration of fhe historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex occurs within City limits. The project site is four acres and completely surrounded by urban uses. All surrounding uses are urban uses including commercial uses. 3. The project site has no value for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project site is not known to have value or habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project houses six existing historic structures and the property has been utilized from time to time for special events. The project is in compliance with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. In addition, a Burrowing Owl Survey was conducted on November 16, 2007 and it was reported that the site is not conducive to burrowing owl occupation. The site is surrounded by commercial and urban development and has no value for endangered, rare or threatened species. 4. The approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The approval of this project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The preservation of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex was planned for restoration while the surrounding development of the Redhawk Towne Center Shopping Center occurred. In addition, the Redhawk Towne Center includes parking to more than adequately provide parking spaces for the Historic complex. The City's Traffic Engineer has determined that the size of the project is insignificant as compared to the existing volumes on Temecula Parkway. Furthermore, it is not expected that noise, air quality or water quality will be impacted with the restoration of the historical Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex. 5. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site for the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex can be served by all required utilities and public services as proposed. The appropriate utility services already provide service to the adjacent retail structures and development within the Redhawk Towne Shopping Center. The proposed reconstructed site has been adequately designed to ensure that all public services will access the site for all necessary services during reconstruction and build-out. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA07-0239 and PA07-0240, the Development Plan and the Certificate of Historic Appropriateness for the restoration of the historic Vail Ranch Historic Headquarters Complex, located at 32115-32125 Temecula Parkway, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7th day of May 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of May 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary VIA E-MAIL and U5PS PECI-IAIYGA CULTURAL Temecula Band of Lurseno A Post Office. IIoz 2183 • Temecula, CA Telephone (951) 308-9295 • Fax (951) 5 September 7, 2007 ~ Ever Chairperson: c Members: Bazgncz, Sr. Darlene Miranda Bridget[ IIarcello Maxwell Director: Gary Duaais Coordinator. Paul Macarro Cultural Analyst Ms. Betsy Lowrey Stephanie Gordin Project Planner Monitor Supervisor: Aurclia Martuffo City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Re: Pechanga Tribe Preliminary Comments on the Vail Ranch Restoration Project, City of Temecula, California Dear Ms. Lowrey: Thank you for inviting us to submit general comments on this Project prior to your Pre- DRC meeting on September 11, 2007 to assess environmental impacts. This comment letter is written on behalf of the Pechanga Band of Luiseiio Indians (hereinafter, "the Tribe', a federally recognized Indian tribe and sovereign government. The Tribe is formally requesting, pursuant to Public Resources Code §21092.2, to be notified and involved in the entire CEQA environmental review process for the duration of the above referenced project (the "Project"). We request that these comments also be incorporated into the record of approval for this Project as well. TRIBAL INTEREST It has been the intent of the Federal Government[ and the State of California2 that Indian tribes be consulted with regard to issues which impact cultural and spiritual resources, as well as other governmental concerns. The responsibility to consult with Indian tribes stems from the unique government-to-government relationship between the United States and Indian tribes. This arises when tribal interests are affected by the actions of governmental agencies and departments. In this case, it is undisputed that the project lies within the Pechanga Tribe's traditional territory. Therefore, in order to comply with CEQA and other applicable Federal and California law, it is I See Executive Memorandum of Apri129, 1994 on Gavernmert-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal Governments and Executive Order of November 6, 2000 on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments. 2 See California Public Resource Code §5097.9 et seq-; California Government Code §§65351,65352,65352.3 and 65352.4 Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unlo Our Care And Rath Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Preliminary Comments on Vail Ranch Restoration Project September 7, 2007 Page 2 imperative that the City and the Project Applicant consult with the Tribe in order to guarantee an adequate basis of knowledge for an appropriate evaluation of the project effects, as well as generating adequate mitigation measures. The Pechanga Tribe has a Long history of involvement with the City, including working as a partner in assessing cultural resources impacts and creating appropriate mitigation measures for such impacts. At this time, the Tribe is not opposed to this development Project. The Tribe's primary concerns stem from the Project's likely impacts on Native American cultural resources. The Tribe is concerned about both the protection of unique and irreplaceable cultural resources, such as Luisefto village sites and archaeological items which may be displaced by ground disturbing work on the Project, and on the proper and lawful treatment of cultural items, Native American human remains and sacred items that may possibly be discovered in the course of the work. PROJECT GENERALLY The Tribe requests that the Lead Agency commit to evaluating Project environmental impacts both to the known sites and to any cultural sites which aze discovered during development, and to adopt appropriate mitigation for such sites, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. The Tribe will be engaging in further assessment of the Project azea, in consultation with tribal elders, to identify more specific concerns and will submit proposed conditions and further comments during the open review periods. REOUESTEDINVOLVEMENT The Tribe requests to work with the Ciry and the Developer in developing all monitoring and mitigation plans for the duration of the Project under California Public Resources code §21081. The Tribe would like to point out that the preferred method of treatment for archeological/cultural sites according to the CEQA is avoidance (California Public Resources Code §21083.1), and that this is in agreement with the Tribe's practices and policies concerning cultural resources. Further, if azchaeologicaUcultural resources are to be impacted by the Project, it is the position of the Tribe that Pechanga tribal monitors should be required to be present during all ground-distwbing activities conducted in connection with the Project, including all archaeological subsurface excavations. Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ojLuiserto Mission Indians Post Office liox 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592 Sacred Is The Dury Trusted Un[o Our Care And nth Honor f4~e Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Preliminary Comments on Vail Ranch Restoration Project September 7, 2007 Page 3 We also request that the City provide us with copies of all archeological studies, reports, site records, proposed testing plans, and proposed mitigation measures and conditions as soon as they become available, for our comment. Further, the Pechanga Tribe believes that if human remains are discovered, State law would apply and the mitigation measures for the permit must account for this. According to the California Public Resources Code, § 5097.98, if Native American human remains are discovered, the Native American Heritage Commission must name a "most likely descendant," who shall be consulted as to the appropriate disposition of the remains. Given the Project's location in Pechanga temtory, the Pechanga Tribe intends to assert its right pursuant to Califomia law with regard to any remains or items discovered in the course of this Project. The Pechanga Tribe looks forward to working together with the City of Temecula in protecting the invaluable Pechanga cultural resources found in the Project area. Please contact us once you have had a chance to review these comments so that we might address the issues concerning the mitigation language. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for the opportunity to submit these comments. Sincerely, . Anna M. Hoover Cultural Analyst Cc: Paul Macarro, Guttural Coordinator Pechmrga Gdtural Resources • Temecula Barrd ofLuiseno Mission ladians Pos[ Office Box 21%3 • Ten+ecula, CA 92592 Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Uato Our Care And ~U: Horsor We Rise To The Need WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager-Chief Engineer ac ooonsT /i0~e '+` o0 C a P* n~~`ftYAT10M D~ I99S MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX www. floodcrontrol.co.riversidaca.us 115783 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DIST~'I (~„'E"~* i : PlanninTDe artment a=a~ ~ ~~ 5,,1 . ~ ;r# 't ~° g p ~l Post Office Box 9033 Ali ' 4 2~,, f r° ~' Temecula, California 92589-9033 • '~-~,,, tt ,,~d Attention: Betsy Lowrey ~`'Q~~? ~ ~ H,,,uT Ladies and Gentlemen: L(1[ Re: PA07-0239 The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District includine District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional Y7ood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logica- component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, inforiation of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with raspect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: Y An encroachment Hermit shall be obtained for an construction related activities occurring within Temecula Cheek Channel or District right of~wav or facilities. For further information, contact the District's encroachment permit section at 951.955.1266. GENERAL INFORMATION This proJ'ect may require a National Pollutant Dischaz *e Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance ~or gading, recordation or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Mattagement Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, pflans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) prior to occupancy. if a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the Califomia Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Perrnit from the U.S. Amty Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these reyuirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be requited from the local Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 perinit. c: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: David Mares Very tmly/yours, ~/~ DALE V. ANDERSON Senior Civil Engineer Date: d /o O Q CO.~ adTY OF RIVERSIDE a HEALT ' SERVICES AGENCY Q DEPARTME~ OF EI~IIRON~€EN'TAL IiL1' City of Temecula Planning Department c% Betsy Lowrey PO BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 5 September 2007 RE: PA07-0239 The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has received and reviewed the PA07- 0239for the Restoration of the Vail Ranch Headquarters which includes historic adaptive re-use and new construction of a commercial shopping plaza with retail, restaurant and office tenants and existing historic structures and new additional "historically appropriate" construction on 4 acres zoned Historical Commercial within the Vail Ranch Specific Plan under the project name of VAIL RANCH RESTORATION DP under applicant: Arteco Partners. The development plan application for a proposed 27,464 square feet located at 32115- 32125 Highway 79 South, generally located at the southeast comer of Redhawk Parkway and Highway 79 South, behind Kohl's. (APN 960-010-044) Any future food facility the applicant shall contact this Department at 951.461.0284 for food plan check compliance by the County of Riverside DEH. If y~ca have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951.955.8980 wp 1 ' Gregor Dellenbach, REHS EHS072940 ($136.00) Local Enforcement Agency • P.O. box 1250, Rive: side. CA 92502-1280 • (909) 955-8982 • FAX (9091 781-9653 • 4080 lemon Street. 9rh Floor. Riverskle. CA 92501 Land Use and Water Engineering • RO. Rox 1206. Riveroidc. (:A 92502-7206 • (909) 955$980 • FAX (409) 955-8903 • 4080 Lemcn Street, 2nd Finor, Riversde. CA 92501 PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0021, A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE HISTORIC VAIL RANCH HEADQUARTERS COMPLEX LOCATED AT 32115-32125 TEMECULA PARKWAY (APN 960-010-044) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 24, 2008, Jerry Tessier of Arteco Partners, filed Planning Application No. PA08-021, a Sign Program in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May, 7, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08-0021 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Code Section 17.28.080 -Sign Program A. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to all of the signs included in the Sign Program. This shall be accomplished by incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors, illumination sign type, or sign shape; All signage proposed within fhe historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex are included in the Sign Program. The Sign Program incorporates a common design element consistent with a western ranch theme including wooden or metal signs (with no internal illumination). Gooseneck down-fighting fixtures (or external spotlights) will be the source of sign lighting throughout the center and no neon or internally lit signage is permitted as is consistent with old west ranch theme. The primary center identification sign will utilize a historic or historic replica of an old ranch water tower. Tenant signage includes two multi-tenant monuments signs constructed of rough hewn wood and local granite blocks, wooden post- mounted pedestrian directional signs, and wooden or metal hanging signs and/or blade signs at the tenant frontage. The signage criteria within the program allows for a variety of sizes and shape with a colors consistent with the Sherwin Williams exterior preservation color palette. B. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, the buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or design motifs included in the building being identified; The signage includes old-west architectural elements consistent with the building architecture such as color, texture, and style. The wall signage is carefully placed to promote the business white maintaining the arhhitectural quality of the building. C. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring adjacent approved signs; The surrounding development will not be adversely affected 6y the proposed signage. All signage is consistent with the Vail Ranch design guidelines for the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex. D. The Sign Program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants; The sign program allows for various types of signage to accommodate changes in building tenants without the need for sign program modification. However, if necessary, the Development Code allows revisions to Sign Programs either by completing a Minor or Major Modification application to the original Sign Program. New signage or a change in signage will be permitted administratively by the Planning and Building Departments. E. The proposed program satisfies the intent of the sign criteria in the Development Code, except that flexibility is allowed with regards to sign area, number, location, and height; The proposed Sign Program is consistent with the sign standards listed in the Development Code and the guidelines of the Vail Ranch Specific Plan except some flexibility was allowed with regards to number and location to enhance the nature of the historic Vail Ranch Complex Headquarters site and as permitted by the Development Code to allow flexibility with the sign criteria to enhance the proposed development. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Sign Program: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15311, Class 11 Accessory Structures). 1. The project consists of construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including on-premise signs. The project, a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Vail Ranch Historic Headquarters Complex, consists only of the addition of signs to the site and buildings after construction of the project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA08-0021, the Sign Program for the historic Vail Ranch Historic Headquarters Complex, located at 32115-32125 Temecula Parkway, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7th day of May 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of May 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA Planning Application No.: Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA08-0021 A Comprehensive Sign Program for the Vail Ranch Historic Complex located at 32115-32125 Temecula Parkway 960-010-044 N/A N/A N/A May 7, 2008 May 7, 2010 Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicanUdeveloper shall deliver to the City of Temecula Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicanUdeveloperhss not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shalt be void due to failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the City of Temecula Planning Department. General Requirements 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the Ciiy with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the Cityto attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. Any and all users of the property including but not limited to property owners, lessees, tenants, assignees, agents, developers, consultants, contractors, representatives and/or third parties shall be subject to the City of Temecula General Plan, City of Temecula Municipal Code and Vail Ranch Specific Plan for any and all uses including modifications to the sign program or construction of any signage shall require approval by the City of Temecula and appropriate building and/or sign permits. All routine and regularfees required by the City of Temecula shall be paid by the applicant. 5. The permittee shall obtain City of Temecula Planning Director approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this sign program. 6. A separate building permit issued by the City of Temecula shall be required for all signage. 7. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 8. The City of Temecula Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 9. The design of all signs on the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Sign Program, contained on file with the City of Temecula Planning Department. 10. All monument signage architecture including highway monument, two multi-tenant wall monuments, and Redhawk Parkway Directional Sign monument shall be stained and sealed rough hewn or sandblasted wood. 11. Applicant shall provide one stain color for consistency to be used on all of the wooden architectural elements forthe highway monument, wall monuments, post directional signs, and Redhawk Parkway Direction Sign to the City ofTemecula Planning Directorfor approval priorto obtaining a building permit for any of these signs. In addition, the same stain shall also be used in the field area of the tenant signage for the post directional signs, wall monument and direction sign (on Redhawk Parkway) to match the stain of the architecture of these signs and as approved by the City of Temecula Planning Director. 12. Applicant shall provide exterior lighting proposal for Planning Director approval for wall monuments and historic signage prior to obtaining a building permit for signage. 13. Applicant shall comply with City of Temecula Development code for monument landscaping. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Planning Application No. PA07-0239, PA07-0240, PA08-0021 Jerry Tessier, Arteco Partners 32115-32125 Temecula Parkway, generally located at the southeast comer of Redhawk Parkway and Temecula Parkway A Development Plan, Certificate of Historic Appropriateness and Sign Program for the restoration of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex. Project proposes adaptive re- use of six historic structures totaling 13,390 square feet (and 13,738 square feet of historically appropriate new construction) for retail/office, restaurant and museum display uses on four acres within the Vail Ranch Specific Plan zoned Historic Commercial In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be issued in compliance with CEQA Development Plan: Section 15332, Class 32 In-Fill Development; Sign Program: Section 15311, Class 11 Accessory Structures Betsy Lowrey City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 May 7, 2008 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or priorto, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. s, 1 Project Site ~ Notice of Public Hearing