Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout050411 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: PUBLIC COMMENTS NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET MAY 4, 2011 — 6:00 PM Earlene Bundy Commissioner Kight Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of April 20, 2011 1 Next in Order: Resolution: 11 -12 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three - minute time limit for individual speakers. All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2 Reconsideration of the Planning Commission's April 20, 2011 approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0010, a Minor Conditional Use Permit for Stop Quick Mart, and to continue item off - calendar until the City Council provides specific direction on their policy regarding ABC Type 21 licenses as requested by Planning Commissioner Stanley Harter PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3 Planning Application No. PA08 -0281, a Tentative Tract Map (No. 30434) with Phasing Plan to subdivide 31.86 acres into 17 lots (16 residential lots and 1 open space lot) with a minimum lot size of one acre and associated Design Guidelines in the L -1 zone located south of Pauba Road, north of Santiago Road, approximately 1,000 feet west of Margarita Road, Cheryl Kitzerow RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08 -0281, A RESIDENTIAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP WITH PHASING PLAN (TTM NO. 30434) PROPOSING TO SUBDIVIDE 31.86 GROSS ACRES INTO 16 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, EACH WITH A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 1 NET ACRES, AND 1 OPEN SPACE LOT. THE PROJECT IS PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN 3 PHASES. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE ARE ALSO PROPOSED. THE PROJECT IS GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD APPROXIMATELY 3,000 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD (ACROSS FROM THE TEMECULA PUBLIC LIBRARY), AND ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF SANTIAGO ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 3,800 FEET EAST OF YNEZ ROAD (APNS 945 - 090 -001, 945- 090 -020, AND 945 - 100 -005). 4 Planning Application No. PA11 -0044, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its 2 wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -15) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 600' east of Margarita Road, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0044, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL ANTENNA FACILITIES ON AN EXISTING JOINT USE WOOD UTILITY POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -15) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 600' EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD 5 Planning Application No. PA11 -0045, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -21) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Margarita Road, approximately 340' east of Avenida Cima Del Sol, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0045 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -21) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 340' EAST OF AVENIDA CIMA DEL SOL 6 Planning Application No. PA11 -0046, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -25) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 145' west of Via La Vida, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0046, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -25) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOLANA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 145' WEST OF VIA LA VIDA 7 Planning Application No. PA11 -0047, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -27) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 200' east of centerline of Margarita Road, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0047, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL ANTENNA FACILITIES ON AN EXISTING JOINT USE WOOD UTILITY POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -27) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOLANA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 200' EAST OF CENTERLINE OF MARGARITA ROAD 8 Planning Application No. PA11 -0049, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -30) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Avenida Buena Suede, approximately 575' east of Avenida Centenario, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0049, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL ANTENNA FACILITIES ON AN EXISTING JOINT USE WOOD UTILITY POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -30) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE, APPROXIMATELY 575' EAST OF AVENIDA CENTENARIO 4 9 Planning Application No. PA11 -0050, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -42) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the northwest side of Margarita Road, approximately 370' west of Avenida Barca, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0050, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM-42) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 370' WEST OF AVENIDA BARCA 10 Adopt a resolution entitled: REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, May 18, 2011, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC - The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 41000 Main Street and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. Additionally, any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commissioners regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review at the locations indicated above. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at www.citvoftemecula.orq. 5 PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS RECOMMENDATION: ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET APRIL 20, 2011 — 6:00 PM Earlene Bundy Commissioner Harter Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio 1 Next in Order: Resolution: 11 -12 1.1 Approve the Minutes of April 6, 2011 APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CAREY; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 CONTINUED FROM APRIL 6, 2011 MEETING: Planning Application No. PA10 -0309, a two -phase Development Plan for a three - story, 97,685 square foot senior congregate care facility with 99 units consisting of studio, one bedroom, and two bedroom apartments, generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraqa Road, Eric Jones 2.1 To be continued to May 18, 2011 at the applicant's request APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CAREY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL 3 CONTINUED FROM APRIL 6, 2011 MEETING: Planning Application No. PA11 -0010, a Minor Modification to an existing Conditional Use Permit to upgrade from Type 20 (Off - sale Beer and Wine) Alcohol License to a Type 21 License (Off -sale General Liquor) for Stop Quick Mini Mart located at 29762 Rancho California Road, Cheryl Kitzerow APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 4 -1; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; HARTER AGAINST RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0010, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO UPGRADE FROM AN ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) TYPE 20 LICENSE (OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE) TO A TYPE 21 LICENSE (OFF -SALE GENERAL LIQUOR) FOR STOP QUICK MINI MART LOCATED AT 29762 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (APN 921 - 310 -022) Eric Roershy, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Daniel McMillan, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Vanessa Van Wey, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, May 4, 2011, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Pat Kight Chairman 2 Patrick Richardson Director of Planning and Redevelopment CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commissioners FROM: Cheryl Kitzerow, Associate Planner DATE: May 4, 2011 SUBJECT: Planning Application No. PA11 -0010 Stop Quick Mini Mart — Request for Reconsideration and Continuance Off - Calendar On April 20, 2001, the Planning Commission voted 4 -1 (Harter opposed) to approve PA11- 0010, a Minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Type 21 (Off- Sale Full Liquor) at the Stop Quick Mini Market located at 29762 Rancho California Road. Staff had recommended denial of the request based on past Council policy. The Planning Commissions' vote included a request for staff to prepare a resolution with Conditions of Approval for adoption at the May 4 meeting. Since the April 20 hearing, Commissioner Harter submitted the attached letter asking that the Planning Commission reconsider their vote and continue the application off - calendar until the Council provides specific direction on their policy dealing with Type 21 Licenses. The Planning Commission can take one of two of the following actions: 1. Vote to continue the matter off calendar until Council provides further direction; OR 2. Uphold original vote and direct staff to bring back a Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval for the CUP at the May 18` meeting. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the reconsideration was published in the Californian on April 28, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius as well as posted at the site. Via Email: Patrick.Rkhardson@cliyoftentecula.org Patrick Richardson Planning Commission City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula. CA 92590 Patrick, Sincere] Stanley A. Harter April 21, 2011 Re: Planning Application No. PA 11-0010 A material consideration for the decision of the Planning Commission last night regarding Planning Application No PA11-0010 for Stop Quick Mini Mart was uncertainty about the current status of the City Council's policy regarding Type 21 Licenses. 1 propose continuing this matter off calendar to a future Planning Commission meeting to provide the City Council with an opportunity to clarify this policy before the Planning Commission makes a decision regarding the underlying Minor Conditional Use Permit. Stanley A. Harter DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Lot Area: Number of Lots: Density: Site: North: South: East: West: STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION May 4, 2011 Cheryl Kitzerow, Case Planner Planning Application No. PA08 -0281, a Residential Tentative Tract Map with Phasing Plan (TTM No. 30434) proposing to subdivide 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential lots, each with a minimum lot size of 1 net acres, and 1 open space lot. The project is proposed to be constructed in 3 phases. Design Guidelines for future development on the site are also proposed. The project is generally located along the south side of Pauba Road approximately 3,000 feet west of Margarita Road (across from the Temecula Public Library), and along the north side of Santiago Road, approximately 3,800 feet east of Ynez Road. Approve with Conditions Mitigated Negative Declaration w/ Monitoring Plan Larry Slusser, on behalf of Naron Pacific L, Low Density Residential /Chaparral Overlay L -1, Low Density Residential Vacant Public Institutional across Pauba Road - Existing City Library Very Low Density Residential across Santiago Road - Existing single - family residences Low Density Residential - Existing single family residences Low Density Residential - Existing single - family residences and vacant land Existinq /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required 31.86 acres /1 acre lots proposed 16 residential /1 open N/A space proposed 0.5 du /ac proposed 0.5 -2 du /ac 1 acre minimum/1.75 acres minimum along Santiago Road BACKGROUND SUMMARY On April 18, 2002, Naron Pacific submitted PA02 -0193, Tentative Tract Map 30434, to subdivide the subject property, and PA02 -0204 to change the zoning on the three parcels from L -1 to L -2 to accommodate the creation of 33 new residential parcels and two new open space parcels. In May 2002, staff determined that rezoning the site from one -acre minimum lots to '/- acre minimum lots would not be appropriate, and that the design of the TTM was inconsistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The applicant prepared subsequent designs between 2002 and 2006, withdrew the request for a Zone Change and submitted Design Guidelines for future development of the project. The application was put on hold as the City went through the General Plan update in 2004 -2005. In December 2008, the project was formally resubmitted as a TTM with Design Guidelines and Phasing Plan (due to the period of inactivity a new PA number was assigned). The 2008 TTM proposed 18 residential lots and 2 open space lots. This design was ultimately revised to avoid impacts to the on -site jurisdictional areas and minimize grading impacts to the site. The current proposal involves 16 residential lots with one open space lot. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map No. 30434 is located along the south side of Pauba Road and the north side of Santiago Road, west of Margarita Road and east of Ynez Road. The property is surrounded by developed and vacant residential lots, as well as paved and unpaved infrastructure. The parcels to the east and west of the site are developed with single - family residences on large lots. The parcel located to the north of the subject site (across Pauba Road) is developed with the City's Public Library and associated parking lot. Site topography is characterized by hill and valley contours. There is an elevation change of approximately 120 feet between the ridgetops and the valley floor. The ridgelines and ridgetops have been disturbed by previous grading and prolonged off -road vehicle activities. The central valley contains an intermittent blueline stream, a tributary of Murrieta Creek. The project has been designed to be sensitive to the existing biological constraints, as well as maintaining the large lot character of development for the area. The project proposes 16 residential lots, one open space lot, and 2 water quality basins. The overall project is anticipated to involve 172,000 cubic yards of cut and 156,000 cubic yards of fill, with the remaining dirt to be exported. Generally, the site topography changes with the project involve an approximate cut of 30 feet from the highpoint along Pauba Road in Phase 1 as well as a cut of approximately 40 feet from the highpoint in the final phase, and that cut dirt being used as fill material for Phase 2. Septic systems, designed in accordance with the standards and requirements of the Department of Environmental Health are proposed. Internal streets would be private (but not gated). No sidewalks or street lights are proposed; however a four -foot decomposed granite path is incorporated into the internal private street design. Construction and map recordation of the project is proposed to occur in 3 phases. Phase 1 includes Lots 1 -3 which take access from Pauba Road. Proposed pads would be approximately 15 feet lower than Pauba Road and the adjacent pad to the west. Phase 2 includes Lots 4 -11, which take access from Street "B ", via an extension and modification of the existing Via Valencia immediately to the west of the project site. Proposed pads would be approximately 45 feet lower than the nearest property to the west, approximately 52 feet lower than the nearest property to the north, and approximately 18 feet lower than the nearest property to the east. The final phase includes Lots 12 -16 and the open space lot. Proposed pad elevation for Lot 16 2 (the only lot in this phase immediately adjacent to existing homes) would range from approximately 14 -34 feet above the adjacent properties to the east. The residential lots in this final phase will be accessed from Street "C" via Santiago Road. Santiago Road, a circulation element street, is required to be improved along the project frontage and transition with the existing roadway to the west to meet City standards. This improvement will result in the connection of Santiago Road from Ynez Road to Margarita Road. A 35 -foot wide section of the Santiago Road right -of -way will be paved with asphalt concrete materials along the southern project boundary. At the southwest corner of the site, the width of Santiago Road will widen from 24 feet to 35 feet over a 250 foot long transition to connect with the existing paved portion of the road. The off -site improvements involve a 348 -foot long section of Santiago Road located approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of John Warner Road and Via Valencia. These off -site improvements will require permits from the California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and the S.D. Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Community Design Element of the General Plan identifies the project site within the Chaparral Area. This overlay area includes development requirements in addition to the development standards for the L -1 zone in the Development Code. The standards require all lots to have a minimum lot size of 1.0 net acre, with lots adjacent to Santiago Road required to be a minimum 1.75 acres. As proposed, the project site meets these requirements. Staff also required that in addition to meeting the minimum lot sizes, given to topography of the site and the slopes provided within the large lots, that the lots provide for a minimum pad size of 0.5 acres. The Chaparral Area also requires that projects ensure the long term protection and maintenance of open space and riverine /riparian areas, with these drainage areas remaining natural. The creation of the open space lot, to be maintained by the Homeowner's Association, satisfies this requirement. Conditions of Approval (No. PL -50c and 60) have been included requiring that the Final Map and CC &Rs indicate this lot to be open space in perpetuity. Projects within the Chaparral Area are required to include Design Guidelines that address grading, architectural styles, details and materials, color palettes, landscaping, irrigation, walls and fencing, and other items related to future development. The Design Guidelines prepared for the project meet this requirement, and a Condition of Approval (No. PL -61) has been included to require these be recorded as a part of the CC &R's for the project. Since no homes are proposed with this map, future homes would be reviewed and approved via a Home Product Review application. The design of the homes shall conform to the Design Guidelines which include the following allowable architectural styles: American Colonial, American Farmhouse, California Ranch, Craftsman, Monterey, and Victorian. The Design Guidelines also include specific requirements for landscaping, fencing, walls and maintenance responsibility. All landscape slopes that slope away from the residential pad /adjacent to a street and the Open Space lot, will be maintained by the HOA. In addition, the slopes along the east side of Street A (but a part of the individual lots) will be maintained by the HOA to ensure plantings, maintenance and slope integrity. Individual property owners would be responsible for all other planting maintenance. A Condition of Approval (No. PL -13) has been included to clarify these requirements on Figure 18 of the Design Guidelines. The wall and fencing proposed within the Design Guidelines strive to minimize the extent of fencing for the project to further enhance the rural quality of the area. Masonry block walls with slumpblock pilasters are proposed along Pauba Road; five -foot vinyl fencing is proposed around the residential pad or property line (not both), and split -rail fencing is proposed along the open space areas and Santiago Road. A Condition of Approval (No. PL -14) has been included to require that the vinyl fencing be view fences (not solid fences). Community entry monuments are proposed at all three project entries - Pauba Road, Santiago Road, and Via Valencia. 3 Staff has determined that the proposed Tentative Tract Map, Phasing Plan, and Design Guidelines are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance, and the project has been conditioned to ensure that all required public and private improvements are constructed and maintained. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 21, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an initial study, it has been determined the project will not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. The Initial Study prepared for the project indicates that the project will have the following potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as Conditions of Approval. 4 IMPACT MITIGATION Air Quality Reduce construction related impacts by implementing the following: • Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas • Prepare a high wind dust control plan and implement plan elements and terminate soil disturbance when winds exceed 25 mph • Stabilize previously disturbed areas if subsequent construction is delayed • Water exposed surfaces 3 times /day and limit on -site travel speeds to less than 15 mph • Cover all stockpiles with tarps if left undisturbed for more than 72 hours • Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as soon as feasible • Provide adequate water spray at truck drops and compaction surfaces during fill placement • Require 90 day low NOx tune -ups for off -road equipment • Limit allowable idling to 5 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment • Utilize equipment whose engines are equipped with diesel oxidation catalysts if available Staff has determined that the proposed Tentative Tract Map, Phasing Plan, and Design Guidelines are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance, and the project has been conditioned to ensure that all required public and private improvements are constructed and maintained. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 21, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an initial study, it has been determined the project will not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. The Initial Study prepared for the project indicates that the project will have the following potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as Conditions of Approval. 4 Based on the above mitigation measures, staff recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. 5 • Utilize diesel particulate filters on heavy equipment where feasible • Use low VOC coatings and high pressure -low volume sprayers Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduce GHG emissions by implementing the following: • New residential building shall be constructed to meet California Title 24 energy efficiency requirements • New appliances and equipment for the residential buildings shall meet Energy Star Certification • Landscape maintenance shall implement green waste and recycling • Landscaping shall include low water requirements and fast growth. • Trees and vegetation shall be planted to shade buildings and thus reduce heating /cooling demand and to sequester carbon Biological Resources Reduce impacts to biological resources by implementing the following: • All graded areas shall be revegetated with California native plant species that are drought tolerant, fire retardant, erosion controlling and habitat providing • Resource Agency permits shall be obtained and copies provided to the City prior to the issuance of grading permits for the Santiago Roadway Improvements or construction of Phase 2 or 3 of the project, whichever occurs first • A minimum of 0.26 acres ( +/ -5:1 ratio) of revegetation /habitat creation within the channel and /or banks shall be achieved Noise Project specific noise impact analysis shall be submitted with an application for Residential Product Review (Development Plan) for merchant built tract or upon submittal of building permits for custom homes on Lots 1 -3 and /or Lots 12 -16. Based on the above mitigation measures, staff recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. 5 FINDINGS Tentative Tract Map (Code Section 16.09.1400) The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 30434 is consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, and the Municipal Code. The project meets the requirements of the L -1 zoning designation, the Chaparral Overlay Area requirements of the General Plan, as well as the Subdivision Ordinance requirements for Tentative Maps. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The project site does not have an agricultural zoning designation by the City of Temecula, and the site is not regulated by a Williamson Act contract; therefore the subject project will not result in the cancellation of a Williamson Contract, The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The project consists of 16 residential lots and 1 open space lot on property designated for low density residential uses within the Chaparral Area overlay, which is consistent with the General Plan, as well as, the development standards for the L -1 zoning designation. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, will not be likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. A Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan have been prepared for the project, which addresses environmental impacts on the site. Mitigation measures (described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program) and the Conditions of Approval have been incorporated to reduce any potential impacts to fish, wildlife or their habitat to less than significant levels. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed by the Fire Prevention Division and the Building and Safety Division. The project has been designed and conditioned to address their requirements. Further, provisions are made in the General Plan and the Development Code to ensure that the public health, safety and welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent with these policies. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. 6 The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior to the construction of single- family residences the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy conservation. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All required rights -of -way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed division of land and adequate conditions and /or modifications have been made to the Tentative Tract Map. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). The project will be required to pay Quimby fees pursuant to the Temecula Subdivision Ordinance Section 16.33. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Plan Reductions Design Guidelines Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Initial Study Mitigation Monitoring Plan Public Correspondence Notice of Public Hearing City of Temecula Aerial - March 2010 PA08 -0281 This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessors Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. t ' +u1• (A(/S. ' //MI J JV.w: - lt. • •Pa, 90 4RMT•t1 • •.rP!• 1 t I _— —� -- -, _ PARCCL JOjj'N WARJfyR ROAD M(9 PFNM! ' wA ' S • .•POIV4• ° °• •3. 00 .5 ' . r4/0 1••••••• u 10.•••••••41 W. St MD WarTO PUOC. MM K _OKO A. Ka CONA•te mu* 04 V. 1a• r RW •a. i1 )12.770012 J D11-Aa - 2 Yo M: ,:r• JQMO -tr ' !Wt•G 4I - tam. l ; s r•O.MS( VIA VALENCIA (EXISTING PRI ROAD) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30434 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA PA08 -0281 IQ .[(/KCAL .001,2 Ammar 1 R AS MOWS, R 'T AY (dAIiO - 440 N I fa o¢/ +sa. Arl/ fu •5in.• ( j � I / 1 fO. t for r -. � c M. I I �, °a. I f•rl •1 11- 1 1 tPev1 WF • r t,I`1` I I 111 ► i I tiiitlt LOT (Olaf NOM OVAM/ITIa • ..toOf Cr Ms.;D taxa• GI •.aa914 •• M ew..a•.Ldea ikkiSa}���K it ro°o„ar 'ev oa .r A M .r.Kr•• a °°.A •.•ah• A.a24 ..I.00••• • OL¢ DaMPAMY AIO1® WM. ' W rrl '�ii um •S r [Ma IY CYIr AIa ° • r7, . A.,. «, coal - o .tore. • m o.. /n.° Fa vX VICINITY MAP OW 10 ME • Mil. Montt • L•tp@ 240 K isnArent MO r p. •o.. a a .e. Meer w • ee f •7,.r .r I• • wr r w G IC6 dP ° e,d ° bmc''or r °''r - 'imr` POWS Ole 66 MS KIN at iv a• o l . ILLS w .T .,...rM� 1•I dIVI era • n ,.a n • ' 7 . �a n .°4Mi °nISBM„,B ° - •r rar,;a S b7, t /m / SHEET NO. 1 OF 2 SHEETS PO4 NM. O A m r•••7, •° �r.om J°' 7,'.: pmeKm K MedoferEngine Inc. zitga MO►•MI• ` J 11 7!7 1111_ 1sa- UPS- -1100 UM- u11- a� -100 H7,- 2-••.1 .. SECTION 'A —A' BLUE: 1• - 30' WPM lTy SECTION 'B —B' Bcua1 1 = 30' .. ..161 i SECTION 'C —C' 8CAilt 1• - 30' 1 - .--11. SECTION 'D —D' SCAR: 1 - 30' SECTION 'E —E' SCAM 1- - 30' .41•110 4/11 1 11 - 0/1 -110 -110 - 1171 -1100 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30434 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA PA08 -0281 PHASING PLAN AND CROSS SECTIONS r 7 / r ' r i t I 1 1 PHASE 1 r— l' 1 PHASE 2 ■ \ \ � 1 /;-b \ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30434 PHASING PLAN OM 88 NO. 2 OP 2 ' 1 saw asolitassa Jja t1 f� r A M�7p Mockler Engimaing, Inc. r STATION 32 +10.51 SCALC nofiq. (RSO'4 STA110 43+00 5C411: NOIRE. 1.00. MT 1 Sit AlxoG*AENr m.05:0 DUDE STATION 35 +00 S;Atf: 11oRir. 1'.00'. viRr. STA110 17+00 SCALE: 00R2. 1.60, WRT. 1'.12' 00 140 lx 140 z Si e lrilL REVISIONS Medo}er Engneermg, IrIC. MS 28610 Mmma( 1,on0 RM.I. CA 92 909-010-55J0/951 -21 -6792 701 MlIES 4101 4 ( LOO VATI NMI MICR Ala HAD OA A 103-1414 AR DMA 910b W OLO*AA10I "MART *mom 0 1187 VAC Mt POI 11030, Ia A RWIAR4 AAA Cr eu AOFS R[ W0.0A004 UK SAC= 10 TIC 0 PIM ~M. IOR /P0 Y.V 000I0 (4Vx 1110-010.0.7) ULV IS /Mr i pMP0I0 MAW. ICA1GOD17 AIO ROROMI0IS WON RRON RJAOMT MINIS 3I01 10 3046 ARE W(CI 10 RENEW NO /PRONE OT R1E AIKRWM1AI AP9000014 AIMS AC Rom � a LtoWARNSS CN4060 W0000 TYPICAI SECTION — SANTIAGO ROAD (510.,(60. i 1 , 028) Up4 10 9CA0 110 0724004 RIDE, L' TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30434 SANTIAGO ROAD GRADING STUDY 0331. R f �L 1• I031I -d -1Pr 70 00 name. ammo 1 K.66. r MIN 10•••• mat I 6• Ian .t../ Ma VS DLL MSS Mt 166• 6•a. - S r ) Ooo9O 0 lama n. 106. mw mn /.m. 7.1 amm Y -r r a Immat Ks. NZ 4191}.6 MEOW .40. I. rat I na 1.' MOMS. Swat Our ...• 'Mt • L Woe A 1.•••• MARIA. +mx 1∎ 1 •■•••• aap.= m. 1 •• 166•66616 .n 61 1 1 u .66+ 16. Mem 6• at Immowm nw10. mwwc Amt maf • 8 'wawa MIN) 0 O Ol 15 • -: �:1- tom` {3 At. ( WO6 'pram 066�� w6 $66•6 ` e"i0i�v�il ao 'd�G°Y'°4°'.rw 1 M M. MN MORK OM W ws (.Yt YMOMl1of 1D■rO V +r 6•F. $ 2 6.6.66.6 .w. mm n r ` b " r w�"aw u $o r 0..ROC SC.uE PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN REVISED 7 8 - 8 CtCm: V D. crtecke0: v D. Cale: 01 /15/09 SHEET L -1 of sheets JOB NO. 08 -135 COMMUNITY ENTRY MONUMENT .AIJ. COMMUNITY ENTRY MONUMENT WALL 3 RAM FENCE TYP. r 1 • • r . 7\ r " ri - 14 J H 4 ,Y V. / a 2 I / *. SY'' :41 11 8 t.il ADRESS PILASTER TYP. NOTE CSC D&9ION GUIDELINES FOR ALL ELEVATION: AND DATAII:J r:ar3rtY uura 3 RAIL FENCE TYP. VINYL FENCE TYR EXISTING PEKE TYP. PROPERTY MARKER TYP. SCE THIS SHUT BELOW r wwam roe leer tf WWII OUR OOP ow oac eaw.o SLUMPI,WCN PILASTER T1P SCE LEGEND SLUMPDLOCK WALL TYP. LEGEND: 011160E COMMUNITY ENTRY MONUMENT WALL 63131+0 SIAM DESCFWMON w, VIM PPR .1..fere 11•7•Fl WARP FENCE AND WALL PLAN REV6E0 w2 .00 zs VP 5 1 g drop: V.0 checked: 4 /.0 dote. 02/13/09 SHEET L-2 of 4 sheets JOB NO. 08 -'35 .•d..oe I shoe .ea Ia .. *ha 1 I.U•• I Tos RlaloaS +ro.. Il 1owlw.a HOMO= In 1.030n11 ail 1 ews® I w sob Trento to a. 001•••• Sao ear • ae. h R 100CA . — ,lOM:O "°'°' „ ,, o, 4. M ■1Ge011 taaf -„ 01LL —. — • � — •• — 0' 1 0 1 .. - 310.00 310 ma. 00./ 00 00S* 4 ..etNO w 1 p 0 tn. 10A Y O N I. -OW.. 1000. 0. 0 0A 0(- 4000. 0'1.0 We.. 100011/ 0 MOM .Mm a. NO 01■13303 T. TT3 . 0ea 0 nO TOW • T/013101. .aKaA01 MISS Of 1430010 . e.Y•0t1a10•0a01 Lumm k W0•<04 vlu ta. ..0 1000. a•aY tl as •••• 000) la 0a4. K mace! a 00 *Tata awl AYA 1 tau.. a... ea ma WA 0 maim 1 etas1 tla 1a na *0 0 Cn • *0.11 64 13130 .a /01111 Sam 10 a .001100E tl m0 TO M tl9 s0a a 000 0aa e0 O 401.3. Oat • AI TIT KW, CS Mfi e.0 Iona Ma w 1•03•3 1•03•3 a0 tl 1a 300. .01301Lra S00 KW IC Are aW1.K pR PFFi 0. mm 101011{1 1. ea tlsaa -Sra 13.3 /3/114111••10•101 so-rn 1. LISM 0 311331Slat Mtan IT Me .4 ,\ h ... \ \\ \\. . N.. . \. !S ' k . , \ , \ , I z \ \ .ran rM OROP10C SCALE FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN d10.re 0.0. checked: V.D. dole: 02/ SHEET L -3 0I f eh0ets JOB NO. 00 -133 d— 1 t .,L J ) + MAID SCALE IMMANMWON MINIM NM 101.MnDw eaer MASTER LANDSCAPE / MAINTENANCE PLAN REVISED i Nvl 5111 rin pii 0. z8 � 3 g h drawn: V.D. checked: V.D. eoG: 0, /26/11 SHEET L-4 or a sheets JO8 NO. 06 -123 DESIGN GUIDELINES For Hidde�i -�� 1 sl E S T A T E S PREPARED FOR: Naron Pacific, Inc. c/o Noel Paine P.O. Box 3093 Hagatna, Guam PREPARED BY: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services 42011 Avenida Vista Ladera Temecula, CA 92591 Phone /Fax: 951.286.0054 e -mail: matthewfagan @roadrunner.com August 2010 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Table of Contents Page I. Design Guidelines — Overview 3 11. Site Planning Guidelines 6 III. Building Design Guidelines 8 IV. Accessory Component Guidelines 18 V. Landscaping Guidelines 21 List of Figures Page Figure 1 TTM 30434 5 Figure 2 Plan - Santiago Road Entry Monument Wall 25 Figure 3 Plan - Pauba Road Entry Monument Wall 26 Figure 4 Plan — Via Valencia Entry Monument Wall 27 Figure 5 Plan — Entry Monument Wall 28 Figure 6 Elevation - Entry Monument Wall 29 Figure 7 Fence and Wall Plan 31 Figure 8 3 Rail Fence Along Streets 32 Figure 9 Vinyl Yard Fence 33 Figure 10 Slumpblock Pilaster 34 Figure 11 Slumpblock Wall @ Lot 1 Pauba Road 35 Figure 12 Driveway Entry Monument w /Address 36 Figure 13 Typical Slope Planting Plan 38 Figure 14 Section A -A, Pauba Road 39 Figure 15 Section B -B, Santiago Road 40 Figure 16 Fuel Modification Plan 42 Figure 17 Section C -C, Creek Area /Fuel Modification Interface 43 Figure 18 Master Landscape Plan /Maintenance Plan 45 Figure 19 Typical Plant Palette 46 APPENDIX A 47 Hidden�Ti�s E S T A T E S 2 I. Design Guidelines - Overview Intent and Use of the Guidelines DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 The goal of this document is to provide requirements for the design, construction, review, and approval of single - family residential development of Tentative Tract Map 30434 (TTM 30434). The development will be consistent with the development requirements for the Chaparral Area which are contained in Community Design section of the City's General Plan. These are further highlighted on p. 6 of these Design Guidelines. The Design Guidelines are offered as one way of achieving attractive and functional projects that compare favorably with established community standards. It is the intent that these Design Guidelines be interpreted with some flexibility. In addition, not all design criteria may be workable /appropriate for each project. In some circumstances, one guideline may be relaxed in order to accomplish another, more important, guideline. The overall objective is to ensure that the intent and spirit of these Design Guidelines are followed and to attain the best possible design within reason. Use of Illustrations and Photos The images used to illustrate the Design Guidelines are intended to be used to provide additional information on the specific guidelines the image is associated with and not with all of the guidelines within the document. For example, an image used to illustrate an encouraged style of roof treatment may also contain a site condition that is not encouraged. The intent is for the reader to focus on the portions of each photo highlighted that relate to the associated text. Use of these Design Guidelines The Design Guidelines for TTM 30434 identify salient elements of a comprehensive design policy, providing a framework within which each individual project must operate. Adherence to these guidelines will ensure that TTM 30434 develops in a sensitive, orderly, and cohesive manner. These Design Guidelines are intended to replace the Citywide Design Guidelines that may apply to this project. Director of Planning Authority In the event that these Design Guidelines are unclear or ambiguous on a matter, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to make a determination if a request is consistent with overall intent of the Design Guidelines. The Design Guidelines are intended to "guide" and the Director of Planning shall have the ability to allow for interpretations of these Guidelines as long as the intent is not compromised. Tentative Tract Map 30434 (TTM 30434) TTM 30434 is a residential and open space subdivision of 31.93 acres (gross). The layout of TTM 30434 is included in Figure 1 for reference. The map creates sixteen (16) Hidde - �ii1 s E S T A T E .S 3 Organization and Content �Hidde i1 s 9 T A T BS DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 developable /residential lots and one (1) open space /homeowner association maintained lot for the intermittent drainage and detention basin. The organization of the Design Guidelines for TTM 30434, while based upon the layout of the Citywide Tract Home Design Guidelines, are structured to systematically address site layout, building design, accessory components and landscape design issues. 4 'Hidde � ids B 8 T A T E S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 1 TTM 30434 5 0 z o G, .r E-1 U 0 0.; w W F-1 w E „ { F d E1 z r ATV .:g, • y - • a+4e a • �l • „� VS �o § • 1 r S Nt M a � 0 u3 Ey giQ 0 I g °P° g H W a E 1 / ter, • -. I / / / ` ` '' -i //7, i• 9� ! i ea N ihlru - 44 d w o" 0 1 II. Site Planning Guidelines DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Intended Use of the Site Planning Guidelines The purpose and intent of the Site Planning Guidelines are to provide guidance on the grading and development of the individual lots. These Guidelines recognize that the overall form (and mass grading) of the site has been approved by the City through the approval of TTM 30434. The approved conceptual grading plan for TTM 30434 is also contained on Figure 1. Grading and Drainage Site grading on individual lots should address existing drainage patterns and Iandforms to be consistent with the development requirements for the Chaparral Area which are contained in Community Design section of the City's General Plan. General Guidelines: a. Grading on individual lots shall not create unstable slope conditions off site. b. Grading and site development activities shall not direct flows onto adjacent properties unless the easements are provided and drainage courses are protected from erosion. c. All cuts and fills shall be at a 2:1 slope or less unless stabilized by a retaining wall or crib wall as approved by the City Engineer. d. Residences should be designed using alternative foundation techniques to maintain the existing topography to the greatest extent possible. Rather than using extensive grading to create flat building areas, stepped and pier and beam foundations will be strongly encourage. Retaining walls interior to the structure are encouraged over stern walls along the exterior face of the structure. e. Where grading occurs, finished slopes should be contoured with land form grading, rather than a formal engineered look. Site and Building Layout Building placement and orientation should be carefully designed to enhance the streetscape, by minimizing the visual prominence of garage doors, retain natural site features, and conserve energy. _ Setbacks must conform to the standards of the applicable zoning code. In addition, the following guidelines should apply to TTM 30434. Hiddef -I e S T A 'r i s 6 General Guidelines: DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 a. A goal in the placement of the main and accessory structures on each site should be to enhance the privacy of rear yard, patio, and recreational areas. Techniques used to achieve this include the use of building location and orientation, slopes, setbacks, walls and fences, and landscaping. b. Development on each lot should be oriented to take advantage of the existing natural features such as the major landforms, ridgelines, significant trees and vegetation, streams and drainage areas. c. Climatic factors such as prevailing winds, shade trees, window and door orientation, and the positioning of buildings on the site shall be coordinated to maximize energy conservation. d. Variations in the front setback are strongly encouraged. This can be attained by shifting the location of the garage doors (both parallel and perpendicular to the street), and /or modifying the building heights when similar architectural styles are used. Hidde r ills E S T A T E S 7 III. Building Design Guidelines DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Intended Use of Building Design Guidelines The purpose and intent of the Building Design Guidelines are to provide direction to the design and detailing of major structures. Within a single tract development, design variation and diversity in buildings and structures are expected to occur. These variations will reflect differences in the use, function, and setting of the buildings and structures. Within TTM 30434, these Guidelines are intended to encourage and support high quality architecture and building design. As a result, the literal interpretation or implementation of these requirements is inappropriate to the overall goals of these Design Guidelines. Architectural Styles The City of Temecula recognizes the value of and actively encourages architectural variation and quality designs for individual homes on larger lots. The following six (6) architectural styles are appropriate for TTM 30434: American Colonial, American Farmhouse, Californian Ranch, Craftsman, Monterey and Victorian. Style elements and details are depicted on the Figures contained in Appendix A of these Guidelines. It is expected that the architectural styles chosen for development in TTM 30434 will utilize the details, elements, massing and materials that are particular to the architectural style. This will allow for quality development that is expected through these Guidelines and the City -wide Design Guidelines. Other architectural styles will be permitted if they meet the intent of these Guidelines, as permitted by the Director of Planning. Building Form The scale and massing of additions and new homes should be compatible with the general scale and shapes of neighboring homes. Building massing can be softened through the variation in wall planes (projections and recesses) alternations in wall height (vertical relief), as well as the form and shape of the roof (silhouettes). Building massing shall be consistent with the architectural style(s) of the structures. General Guidelines: a. Unarticulated and box -like designs should be avoided for multi -story buildings. b. Where feasible, the building massing should accentuate the primary entrance and minimize the prominence of the garage. c. To minimize the dominance of garage doors on the street facade, the placement and setbacks for attached garages should vary. The use of side entry, detached, and /or rear garage layouts are encouraged. Hid '11 U S T A T E S 8 d. Two -story homes are encouraged to incorporate single -story elements when those elements are compatible with the architectural style and when the homes are located on prominent elevations that are visible from long distances and/or are highly visible from the adjacent arterial streets when in character with the architectural style of the building. g. f. Variable and multi -form roofs such as gabled and shed roof combinations are encouraged to create varying roof forms and break up the massing of the building. These roof forms should be consistent with the style of the architecture. Roof eaves should extend out from the primary wall surface to enhance shadow lines and articulation of wall surfaces. When consistent with the architectural style, eave extensions of 24 inches are desirable. h. No Tess than every third house should incorporate similar variations in roof forms, changes in roof planes and elevations, consistent with the underlying architectural style(s), on all building elevations visible from the public street. Architectural styles may be repeated no more often than every third house. Articulation Building designers should incorporate 360- degree architecture in all buildings. 360 - degree architecture means the appropriate articulation of all building facades, including variation in massing, roof forms, and wall planes, as well as surface articulation to create shadow patterns and massing shapes that contribute to a building's character. It is expected that the highest level of articulation will occur on the front facade and facades visible from streets; however, similar and complementary massing, materials, and details are encouraged to be incorporated into the other building elevations. General Guidelines: Hidde Hilts e STATES DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 9 a. Building elements and details need to be consistent with the chosen architectural style(s). b. Offsetting building planes can be used to create additional articulation to the building elevations and massing. c. Architectural elements that are consistent with or complementary to the architectural style of the building should be incorporated into the building design to add visual interest, scale, and character. Examples include recessing or projecting balconies, the use of trellises, recessing windows, verandas and porches, as well as other architectural components, light fixtures, attic vents, window ledges, and other similar items. d. Decorative chimney caps that incorporate concealed spark arrestors should be used on all chimneys. E S T A T I S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 10 e. Porches should be a minimum of six feet deep with materials and /or details that are necessary to achieve an authentic architectural style. '�Hidde��I3il�s' E S T A T E S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Entrances, Doors, and Windows DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 The placement and design of major entries, doors, and windows help to capture the desired architectural style of the building and establish how the structure relates to the surrounding property. General Guidelines: a. The main entrance to a home should be clearly identifiable and appropriately articulated with projecting and/or recessed forms. b. Windows should be located to maximize daylighting and view. c. Window materials, shapes and proportions should complement the architectural style of the building. Hidde Ii�s ESTATES 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 d. When consistent with the architectural style, the primary upper and lower windows should substantially stack vertically when consistent with the design of the building. e. When consistent with the architectural style, windows shall have divided lights appropriate to the architectural style of the building. f. Walls surfaces, eaves, and windows should be articulated with sills, trim, kickers, shutters, or awnings when they are authentic to the architectural style of the building. "Hidde i13s I: S '1' A '1' C S 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 g Decorative shutters shall compliment windows so that they create the appearance of a real and functional shutter. E S T A T E S 1 14 Materials and Colors High quality materials should be used to create a look of permanence within the project. Materials and colors should be varied to create visual interest in building facades and to reduce the monotonous appearance that can take place in tract home developments. General Guidelines: a. The materials and colors should convey a sense of quality construction that is consistent with the architectural style of the building. b. Varied materials and colors can be used to enhance different parts of a building's facade. c. Changes to building material should occur at inside corners or where important architectural elements such as chimneys, pilasters, building projections, or fences intersect. d. Heavier materials should be used lower on the building elevation to form the building base. e. The pitch, materials and colors of the roofs shall be consistent with the desired architectural style. f. Colors that contrast and complement should be used on trim, windows, doors, and other key architectural elements. g. Gutters and downspouts should be decorative and designed to integrate with the building facade and should not appear as a "tacked on" afterthought. iidde ilk's C 8 •r A T E S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TIM 30434 15 Garage Doors DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Garages should be integrated into the overall design of the project and should not be designed so as to dominate the street scene. General Guidelines: a. Garage doors should incorporate panels, windows, or other features to articulate and enhance these large planes. b. The distance between the garage door and the street and the orientation of the garage doors should be varied when feasible. c. The use of multiple garage doors is encouraged to diversify the front of the building. d. Garage doors should never be set in front of the main house, unless it is a side entry garage. Variations to this Guideline will be allowed by the Director Planning if it is determined that there is sufficient articulation, massing and screening that meets the intent of this Guideline. OIL alr • 2 144 /thi 6 5 T A T C S 16 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 z'' ice; Pr 1 1 1 e. Garage doors should be recessed a minimum of six inches from the face of the garage. f For garage doors that are visible from and facing the street, the ratio of garage frontage to the width of the house should not be greater than 50 percent. g• Varying the arrangement of garage doors can improve the building's aesthetics and break up the massing of the front of the garage. (: S T A T R S 17 Lighting DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 IV. Accessory Component Guidelines Intended Use of Accessory Component Guidelines The purpose and intent of the Accessory Component Guidelines are to provide direction on the layout and provision of utilities, lighting, and accessory structures. Utilities Utilitarian aspects of the project should be aesthetically screened from view. General Guidelines: a. Electrical meters, cable boxes, junction boxes, and irrigation controllers should be designed as an integral part of the building and placed on a rear or side elevation. b. All vents, gutters, downspouts, flashing, and electrical panels shall be painted to match the surface to which attached, unless used as a major design element, in which case the color is to be consistent with the overall color scheme of the building. c. The discharges from gutters and downspouts should be directed to landscaped areas when feasible. d. Centralized mailboxes should either be located in close proximity of the residential units being served or centrally located near the project entrance. The exact location shall be coordinated between the United States Postal Service and the City Planning Department, prior to the recordation of the Final Map. e. Street addresses shall be a minimum of six inches (6 ") in height and shall be displayed so that the addresses are easily visible to approaching emergency vehicles. Lighting fixtures should be selected to complement the architecture and layout of the project. The quantity and quality of light, as measured in foot - candles, should be consistent with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance. Lighting levels should not be so intense as to draw attention to the glow or glare of the project site. General Guidelines: a. All light fixtures shall be shielded to minimize glare and the illumination upon neighboring properties and open space areas. b. Light fixtures should be architecturally compatible with building design when prominently visible. Hidd�te - H�i1t e s r A T s 18 Accessory Structures General Guidelines: DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 c. Lighting systems should incorporate timers and sensors to avoid unnecessary illumination and to conserve energy. Large lots with customized homes have space to allow the placement of a number of accessory structures and buildings. Common examples include second units, guest homes, casitas, detached garages and workshops, and gazebos. The siting and construction of these accessory structures should be carefully considered to ensure compatibility with the surrounding properties. a. The architectural style, building materials, and colors of the main structure should be incorporated into the major accessory structures such as detached garages, guest houses, and second dwelling units when feasible. b. The architectural style materials, and colors of the main structure are encouraged but not required for the minor accessory structures such as gazebos, sheds, and shade structures. c. Accessory structures should be sited to create opportunities for increased privacy between adjacent properties. d. Building setback and separation requirements shall be respected in locating and site accessory buildings. Hidde ills E S T AT G S 19 dd 1I 1 Es 'I A? 8 5 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TIM 30434 e. Casitas will be allowed in the side and rear yards of the lots and shall be placed in a manner that compliments the main structure. 20 V. Landscaping Guidelines Intended Use of Landscaping Guidelines The purpose and intent of the Landscaping Guidelines are to provide direction to the design and construction of homeowner association maintained landscape areas and to provide a reference on yard landscaping for individual homeowners. The use of these Landscaping Guidelines for individual homeowners and for areas within the rear and side areas is optional. Landscape plans for areas with native and naturally occurring vegetation do not require the submittal of a landscape plan when the native vegetation is being retained. Plant Materials DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Landscaping should be used to define areas such as entrances to buildings and projects, provide additional shade, complement outdoor activities, and provide privacy screening when needed. All landscaping plant materials shall comply with the Plant Palette, which is contained in Figure 19. General Guidelines: a. The planting of larger specimen trees are encouraged. Specimen trees should be strategically planted to assist new development in looking "established" as quickly as possible. At maturity they shall have root barriers and not encroach on adjacent property or create barriers to the solar access rights of adjoining property. b. Trees and shrubs should be selected and planted to minimize root problems. c. Plant materials should be placed to not interfere with the lighting of the premises or restrict access to emergency apparatus such as fire hydrants or fire alarm boxes. d. Trees or large shrubs shall not be planted under overhead lines or over underground infrastructure if growth may interfere with such public utilities. e. Trees should be kept trimmed to not interfere pedestrian and vehicular traffic safety. f. Trees and shrubs should be located and spaced to allow for mature and long- term growth. When placing trees and large shrubs the following guidelines should be taken into consideration. At least 35% of trees provided shall be of an evergreen species. • A minimum of 5 feet between the center of trees or large shrubs and the edge of driveway, water meter or gas meter and sewer laterals. Hidde1�AI11YS 21 g. DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 • A minimum of 10 feet between the center of trees or large shrubs to utility poles. • A minimum of 8 feet between the center of trees or large shrubs and fire hydrants and fire department sprinkler and standpipe connections. To the extent possible, landscaping along street frontages should coordinate with adjacent properties to provide a consistent visual corridor. h. In front yard areas, for every 500 square feet of landscaping, at least one tree shall be provided. In front yard areas, for every 50 square feet of landscape area, one shrub or vine should be provided. A combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be incorporated into landscaping plans. Minimum sizes are as follows: • Trees: 36 -inch box 20 percent. • Trees: 24 -inch box 20 percent. • Trees: 15- gallon box 20 percent. • Shrubs: 5- gallon 100 percent. • Groundcover: 100 percent coverage within one year. k. Slope banks five feet or greater in vertical height with slopes between 5:1 and 2:1 shall, at a minimum, be irrigated and landscaped with an appropriate groundcover for erosion control. • Slope banks five feet or greater in vertical height with slopes greater than or equal to 3:1 shall, at a minimum, be irrigated and landscaped with appropriate groundcover for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: o One 15 gallon or larger tree per each 600 square feet of slope area; o One gallon or larger shrub per each 100 square feet of slope area; and o Appropriate groundcover. • Slope banks in excess of eight feet in vertical height with slopes greater than or equal to 2:1 shall also provide, one five - gallon or larger tree, per each 1000 square feet of slope area in addition to the requirements above. • All trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggering clusters to soften and vary the slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. Where trees are planted in paved areas, a protective tree grate shall be provided. "Hidde?i4i 1�s • 8 T A T L' 8 22 Irrigation and Water Conservation DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Native and low water plants in conjunction with an efficient water system, such as drip irrigation, should be incorporated in the landscaping design. Landscape plans for common and /or homeowner association maintained areas shall be submitted to the City for approval. The City of Temecula's Water Efficient Irrigation Ordinance contains the requirements for those landscape plans. Compliance with these guidelines and requirements by individual property owners are encouraged. General Guidelines: a. Plants shall be grouped in high and low maintenance zones and coordinated with irrigation plans to minimize use of water and the placement of irrigation tubing. b. Drought tolerant plants should be selected wherever feasible. The use of native plant materials is encouraged around the homeowner associated maintained watercourse. c. All landscaped areas should have automatic irrigation systems installed when appropriate. d. Irrigation systems should be designed to prevent overspray onto walkways, parking areas, buildings, and fences. e. The use of drip systems is encouraged in all non -turf areas. Project Entry Features Project entry features are incorporated into the common areas of TTM 30434 and have been designed to comply with these Guidelines. There are three (3) project entries —off of Santiago Road, Pauba Road Via Valencia Road, respectively. These project entries have been coordinated to complement one another and to create a unified project appearance. The Project Entry Features are depicted on the following Figures: Figure 2 (Plan — Santiago Road Entry Monument Wall), Figure 3 (Plan — Pauba Road Entry Monument Wall), Figure 4 (Plan — Via Valencia Entry Monument Wall), Figure 5 (Plan — Entry Monument Wall), and Figure 6 (Elevation - Entry Monument Wall). General Guidelines: a. A combination of the following accent features can be incorporated into the project entry: ornamental landscaping, architectural monuments, decorative walls, and /or signs. b. Project entry features shall reflect the overall architectural identity and character of the project. "Hid eta iTh S S T A T E S 23 d. Project icons, thematic pilasters, special paving treatments, and specialty landscaping should be used to unify a project. DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 c. Colored, textured, and permeable paving treatment at entry drives is encouraged to accentuate these areas. e. All monumentation shall be constructed of high quality materials. L' ti 'I' A 'I' I: S 24 Hidde '�Ii1�s T A 'r i! 8 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 2 Plan - Santiago Road Entry Monument Wall 25 �4 1 � r-w=s-------.• W ® c„ 0_ La ec U T '\ c 0 Q LO , aZi W J1 CC V1 z W o r OW z - W U1 J W M VI < cr w w Li z z U 7Li zOix O L.. N 0 0 J W W WI m cc 9 M r ut 0 0 0 a a 0 cc iP ti` i N . <:: •..\ ■.',. Ll 1— O z 61 00 a? :g 1 a x i/1 w Lai W N W U CZ W O a La. N tTS C a) c 0 w as 0 0 aE. ^ J f ( C CO Hidde 1 ss E S T A T E S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 3 Plan - Pauba Road Entry Monument Wall 26 O z i t4 (d c N E c 0 c w 0 CC Q Q (Q , LY LL L Hidde ilt DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTN130434 Figure 4 Plan — Via Valencia Entry Monument Wall 27 1 O Z .a+ E c 0 L 4- c W U C a) Z j CL W Cr U iidde ' it s is S 'r A r E 5 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 5 Plan — Entry Monument Wall 28 w� N W z a ? W to cr CC o za W 0 w ~ O 6. S tn O W .z: 5 c W W </W- W U VS W k'j `V3a 5 as f Hidde��Il�s ES •r AT e s DESIGN GUIDELINES: TIM 30434 Figure 6 Elevation - Entry Monument Wall 29 Walls and Fences DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 The Fence and Wall Plan is included as Figure 7. 2- and 3 -Rail Fence is included as Figure 8. A vinyl yard fence is depicted on Figure 9. This fencing is permitted on rear and side yards as depicted on Figure 9. Figures 10 and 11 are the detail for a Slumpstone Pilaster and Slumpstone Wall, respectively. These are limited to the Pauba Road frontage, as depicted on Figure 10. Lastly, Driveway Entry Monumentation is depicted on Figure 12. These are a 24" x24" masonry column, with a slump block cap and light fixture. Six inch (6 ") address numbers will be affixed to these monuments. Where fencing and walls are essential, these elements should be designed to complement the architecture of the project. Fences /walls adjacent to Santiago and Pauba Roads need to be landscaped and screened to enhance the character of the area. General Guidelines: a. Fence and wall materials and colors should be designed to complement the architecture of the adjacent buildings. b. Fences and walls adjacent to arterial streets should be constructed as low as possible consistent with their screening, noise attenuation, and security functions. c. The materials and colors of any walls adjacent to arterial streets should be compatible and complementary with the existing walls near the property. d. Fencing is preferred over walls and should be encouraged wherever possible. e. Solid walls in sloping terrain should be "stepped" to follow the terrain. f. Double fencing on a property is strongly discouraged. '" Hidde �Ii13`s E 9 T A T C 9 30 Hidde - -�3i1 s L 8 T A T L S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 7 Fence and Wall Plan 31 cr w Es' ce Z W OOOW O M 5 !it g .. f '` 5 ` i t. ✓ -' - / / Tx...". . e.a , i,vi... .......... vty � I 4 NbS "���..�_ DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 8 3 and 2 Rail Fence 1 J 4 l Y rY 0 r• CArAW 0.. SECTION GLUE CAP TO POST ELEVATION NOTE. ALL FENCE MATERIALS ARE CONSTRUCTED CF HIGH OE\SITY POLYETHYLE\E. SECTION / ELEVATION 3 and 2 Rail Fence 'LOUT MAIL SLOTS ON POSTS AS I EQ D. TO ALLOW FOR ELEVATION CHANGES BETWEEN POST— TYPICAL. 6 "x6" POLYETHYLENE POST 8' —C 0 2 "x6" .)OLYETHVLENE HAIL TIP FIN. GRC. CONCRETE FOOTING. ALLOW .3" CLEAR FROM END OF POST TO BOTTOM OF CONCRETE. 90% COMPACTED NATIVE MATERIAL 6 "x6" POLYETHYLENE POST A' —O" 0.C. 2 "x6" POLYETHYLENE RAIL TYP. UT7 SEE FENCE AND WALL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS FIN. ORD. FIGURE 8 E S T A T E S 32 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 9 Vinyl Yard Rail Fence J 0 `c in Vinyl Yard Fence NTS VINYL FENCE PANEL 4" SQ. VINYL FENCE POSTS 8' -O" O.0 INSTALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS PER MAUFACTURER TYP, FIGURE 9 HiddeeYr - H ilts e S T A T t S 33 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 10 Slumpstone Pilaster • \ /1// \ \// 1 / \ \ �� / / \ / . /` \� � i�i iV ( i�iiii`ifii� /. , PILASTER SHALL HAVE VERT. #4 REBAR (I EA. CORNER W /HORZ. CROSS BRACE ( #3 REBAR, TYa. 3 PLCS.) CONCRETE FOOT1N3 2000 P.S.I. MIN. ' Iidd�eff {i1�s` ESTATES 34 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 11 Slumpstone Wall @ Lot 1 Pauba Road NTS PROP. UNE T(P PROJECT SIDE a SLUMP BLOCK CAP 6x4x f 6 SLUMP BLOCK (COLOR SELECTED BY OWNER) FINISH GRADE NOTE; INSTALL ANTI- GRAFFlTTI COATING TO ALL WALLS TYP. Slumpblock Wall • Lot 1 Pauba Road FIGURE 11 Hidde ills t ti T A T 1: 5 35 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 12 Driveway Entry Monument w /Address NTS 'iG NOTE AFFIX 6" ADDRESS NUMBERS TO THE STREET FACING SIDE TYP. 1 1 SLUMP BLOCK CAP AND LIGHT FIXTJRE F3Y OWNER r." ADDRESS NUMBERS TYP. "x 24" MASONRY COLUMN FINISH GRADE ACM INSTALL AM1- GRAFFfT11 COATING TO ALL WALLS TYP. Driveway Entry Monument w/ Address FIGURE 12 Hidden =�Ti1 s It 9 T A T C 9 36 Street Scenes DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Streetscenes have been developed for project frontages along Santiago and Pauba Roads. These streetscenes are depicted on Figure 13 (Typical Slope Planting Plan), Figure 14 (Section B -B, Santiago Road) and Figure 15 (Section A -A, Pauba Road). The intent is to have a uniform and comprehensive landscape concept along these frontages which give identity to the project, yet allows the project to be integrated into the surrounding area(s). General Guidelines: a. Slopes shall be no greater than 2:1. b. Slopes on Santiago Road shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association (HOA), as depicted on Figure 17. c. Slopes on Pauba Road shall be maintained by the individual property owner. d. Walls, fences and monumentation shall be installed per the Fence and Wall Plan and the Major and Minor Entry Monumentation Plans. e. A combination of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs, as well as groundcovers shall be utilized. �Hiddr Tilts E S T T S 37 �i dd I en -' H i1T EST A T US DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 13 Typical Slope Planting Plan 38 0 2 Ott 0 0 - / 0 0 • • 0 Cis ofri o • oo 94 atele Oh 0 oar ti 0 1.. 1- / 0 co s ae . op so 004 olgo ifike -I c I. I I I I 0 „1 ' 0 0 OP % ': • GO igh itlytirzeir 0 '417 Agifo 041Y 0 r. �ti„ 84$ anti I`I 1• J, .01 0 a 0 w 00 0 CC 0 (/) 2 Y L 0 ez) w cr n z� 0U O j 0 zz m ce a I)w � O 0 w ON w 0 Hid e � Ii11 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 14 Section B -B, Santiago Road 39 : 111 =111 IIIETI I -III- fitlll._ I1 =1IV= 1 =1 1. — 111 — V) a 111 -11 11211 -- • 11111 -1I D III =III p �t l 1=11-1.--- I 17E111 °2 I I 1 I = c8 Q Q M 11E111 : /1 -- 111=i- 111L=11 1 -1111— III =111: - 111 =1 11 -111= 111=- 11:111 III - 1=L-11 - - - - 111—_1 =1If= Hidde mss' e 9 T A T@ S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 15 Section AA, Pauba Road 40 W Ln T=1 ill -11 ITTr TiEr —��• I -1I 11; =111 1 -111= 111 =III 1=111- 11-11 i VI 1 I =111= _II l=1I III =11 1=11E 1 -111- III —ill 1=i 1 i =, 1 —t � iii 7a -- -St, 11 -111: II1M 11E11, 11 -111_ -III- I =III =l El 1 F :111=-F I -III- 2 w I llifllil W 0 j l = 1 I i= F 1 1111 .I II III� El 11F at W to U O ++- 0 z W ix a 00 Z z a w Liu N � W 00. w o 0 Z -- Fuel Modification Zones DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Due to the preservation of the open space within the project, a Fuel Modification Zone must be established to meet the requirements of the Fire Department. The Fuel Modification Zones are depicted on Figure 16 (Fuel Modification Plan) and Figure 17 (Section C -C, Creek Area /Fuel Modification Interface). These Figures show that any parcels that are adjacent to the open space component of the plan are subject to some degree of fuel modification. General Guidelines: a. Fuel modification zones shall total a minimum of one hundred feet (100') in width. b. Zone "A" of the Fuel Modification Zone can range in width from thirty feet (30') to one hundred feet (100') in width and shall be irrigated. No combustible structures are allowed in this Zone. c. Maintenance of the Fuel Modification Area in Zone "A" shall be by the HOA. d. The width of Zone "A' may be reduced if a block wall is installed. e. Zone "B" of the Fuel Modification Zone can range from zero feet (0') to seventy feet (70') in width. f. Within Zone "B ", all dead and dying vegetation shall be removed, with thirty percent (30 %) of the area thinned out. g. All plantings in Zone "A" and Zone "B" shall be consistent with the Plant Palette on Figure 10. h. Streets shall be counted as appropriate fuel modification. Maintenance of the Fuel Modification Area in Zone "B" shall be by the individual homeowner. All Fuel Modification Zone requirements shall be approved by the Fire Department. L' S T A T C S 41 H idde Hit IR S T AT l'. 5 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 16 Fuel Modification Plan 42 Hidde ills E S T A T E S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 17 Section C -C, Creek Area /Fuel Modification Interface 43 1 11 111= Ilia_ 111 -111. 1= t j= III o ▪ 3NI1 3wrJ HSIj 11111 a. iI —I�1 —i I= -111 —L —rl El I11 = T U lA, 11 -111 -1 2 111=-111E ; m l i- - I: a o 1 1 Z 111 — I:1: a I E11E1 N § 111111 r T =i l is 111 -111 111 -111 _ 11=111E ill -iii I I -11 t- 111 -(11 III =III 11 -111 111--111 0 1 =111E - T =1 1► -III - 111.E111: 11 e c n 010 11E1117-- I I I. a X f 1 �� 11r 11 0 X CC 0 0 a) 0 c0 a) 0 0 0 2 O 7 u- U ` I O(at; z O e U a) U)Oz Master Landscape /Maintenance Plan DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 A comprehensive "master" landscape maintenance plan is essential to ensure that all landscape areas are developed in conjunction with the Design Guidelines and that ultimate responsibility for maintenance is clearly defined. The Master Landscape Plan /Maintenance Plan is depicted on Figure 18. General Guidelines: a. All landscaped areas shall be installed in the manner described in the prior Sections of these Guidelines. b. All landscape areas shall be maintained by either the HOA or the individual property owner(s). c. Contiguous landscape areas that abut separate maintenance responsibility areas shall be clearly demarcated. d. Entry monumentation shall be maintained by the HOA. Hidd Iif F' S T A T E S 44 Hi - Mi lls L S T A T P. $ DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 18 Master Landscape Plan /Maintenance Plan 45 c 0 cT a. ci (.) (i) - o ocs _J a) I Marx J J J J J J J S>IY01.3a 3/IS 31VVN NO M3 3AVN le0thliti0e 1 NOIL►1r13a88Y :Sag ell 324rJS 31H'100 3>IYJs 31 3)1MJS 3111100 .SBndHS FULL & SPREICING O 5' O.C. FLIL & et.SITY 0 6' C.C. R..li & 64SITY 0 6' C.C. a3. ncaO 4 " . I NYCPCRLtd PAR41FOLLIY 1 PINK WYOPORL* I 1 GAL I TRIANGULAR SPACING 0 a' O.C. 1` SI ,1Ir, St '10 w' l -0'C ir:? 103 S d1Otfr: 7N{H1530H5 PIN( DAWN CHIT.ALP0, CanrS NYZ4?13� PROSTRATE ACACIA Pads NaQHL' iU SISN31N3)11-1SV1 ad1vJJH3 v3CnNl SfHa 5 t'I�v'►rt HETERO*IaES :R3J1IFOLIA ,ZnbQ YJNYS,d '315 'NOV 1 1H3 NY1 IlHa '(1321 leafy - 13 H %JAS loartAs ETA (ii ® LI + •1 CD DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 Figure 19 Typical Plant Palette w CL w ce eai: X47 Eto eh CO (10 Lai Ct �Hidde 'Hips C S T A T C S 46 1 Hiddes e s? n T I S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 APPENDIX A Architectural Styles 47 orr Bunn Hidde ids` 1! S T A T C S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 AMERICAN COLONIAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 1. Two -story symmetrical box -like form. 2. Large main gable hip roof. 3. Enhanced entry portico or covered porch supported by simple round columns. 4. Horizontal wood or vinyl siding may be combined with brick. 5. Multi -paned windows with shutters on front elevations. Doors: Solid wood with panels. Windows are encouraged. Garage: Will be consistent and compliment the architectural style. Materials and Color: Horizontal siding. Light colors with complimenting trim and accents. The use of brick is encouraged. Porches and Balconies: A covered front portico with simple wood columns is a signature feature of the American Colonial style. Rear and Side Articulation: Will be enhanced on homes with rear and side public views. Roofs: Main gable or hips. Moderate pitches from 5:12 to 12:12. Deep overhangs with open eaves 12 " -16 " Concrete or asphalt tile roofing. Colors will compliment the house. Windows: Multi - divisioned single or double -hung with wood trim. Dormers are encouraged. Accent shutters on front elevations. 48 14idd i1t P, S T A T E S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 1. Two -story box -like or L- shaped form. 2. Medium- pitched, primary front to back main gable roof form with intersecting hip, gable and shed roofs and standard overhangs. 3. Flat, shake - textured concrete tile or asphalt shingle roof material with standing metal seam accents. 4. Large covered porches with simple wood columns. 5. Lap siding or stucco on main body with lap siding at gable ends. Doors: Solid wood with panels. Windows are encouraged. Garage: Will be consistent and compliment the architectural style. Roll -up doors with windows are encouraged. Materials and Color: Horizontal siding or stucco. Colors can range from Tight to bold with complimenting trim and accents. The use of brick is encouraged. Porches and Balconies: A covered porch with simple wood columns is a signature feature of the American Farmhouse style. Rear and Side Articulation: Will be enhanced on homes with rear and side public views. Roofs: Main gable with intersecting gables or hips. Steep pitches from 6:12 to 12:12. Deep overhangs with open eaves 12 " -16 ". Concrete or asphalt tile roofing. Colors will compliment the house. Windows: Multi - divisioned single or double -hung with wood or stucco trims where appropriate. Bay windows. Dormers are encouraged. Accent shutters on front elevations. 49 1, Horizontal one and two -story massing form. 2. Low to medium - pitched main gable roof with standard overhangs. 3. Flat, shake- textured concrete tile or asphalt shingle roof material. 4. Large porch at entry with simple columns that often feature kickers. 5. Stucco on main body with lap siding or board and batten accents. 6. Sometimes features brick or stone veneers on first story elements, Doors: Solid wood with panels. Windows are encouraged. Garage: Will be consistent and compliment the architectural style. Roll -up doors with windows are encouraged. Materials and Color: Horizontal siding or stucco. Earth tone colors with complimenting trim and accents. The use of brick is encouraged. Porches and Balconies: A covered porch with simple wood columns is a signature feature of the California Ranch style. Rear and Side Articulation: Will be enhanced on homes with rear and side public views. Roofs: Main gable with intersecting gables or hips. Moderate pitches from 4:12 to 5:12. Broad overhangs or eaves Concrete or asphalt the roofing. Colors will compliment the house. Windows: Multi - divisioned single or double -hung with wood or stucco trims where appropriate. Dormers are encouraged. Accent shutters can be used where appropriate. E S T A T E S g i g a DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 CALIFORNIA RANCH ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 50 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 CRAFTSMAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 1. Shallow- pitched gable -ended roofs with deep overhangs. 2 Deep, broad porch element with expressive structural components such as square or tapered columns. 3. Expressive structural elements such as rafters, brackets, braces, and columns. 4. A mixture of materials such as stone, shingles. stucco, and wood siding. 5. Multi -paned windows with wood trim. Doors: Solid wood with panels. Windows are encouraged. Garage: Will be consistent and compliment the architectural style. Roll -up doors with windows are encouraged. Materials and Color: Horizontal shingle or stucco siding. Earth tone colors with complimenting trim and accents. The use of stone or brick is encouraged. Porches and Balconies: Craftsman homes feature a front porch supported with tapered columns of wood, stone or brick. Rear and Side Articulation: Will be enhanced on homes with rear and side public views. Roofs: Basic gable with intersecting gables. Low pitches from 4:12 to 5:12 with broad 16' -24" overhangs. Flat concrete tile — shingle appearance. Exposed rafter tails. Colors will compliment the house. Windows: Multi - divisioned single -hung with wood trim. Accent shutters can be used where appropriate. L S T AT L C 51 Hiddea�i s ES T A T E 9 DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 MONTEREY ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 1. Simple wood posts and heavy beams with exposed wood corbels or rafters. 2. Second -story cantilevered wood picket or wrought iron balcony. 3. Low - pitched or gable -ended roofs. 4. Shingle, flat or barrel tile roofing. 5. Windows paired with real or false shutters. 6. Accent materials include stucco. brick. siding. and wood. Doors: Paneled wood to compliment the style. Enhanced trim is encouraged. Garage: Will be consistent and compliment the architectural style. Roll - up doors with windows are encouraged. Materials and Color: Light colored stucco siding Often features extensive use of brick. Trim and accents will compliment the color of the house. Porches and Balconies: The cantilevered balcony is a signature feature of the Monterey style and features wood columns and wood or wrought iron railings. Rear and Side Articulation: Will be enhanced on homes with rear and side public views. Roofs: Main gable with shed roof over balcony. Moderate pitches from 4:12 to 6:12. Flat concrete tile, barrel or "S" style roofing. 12 " -24" overhangs. Colors will compliment the house. Windows: Vertical multi - divisioned with wood or stucco trim. Accent shutters can be used where appropriate. Enhanced trim is encouraged. 52 1. Simple, asymmetrical massing. 2. Front -to -back main gable or hip roof with intersecting turrets, hip, shed, and gable roofs and shallow overhangs. 3. Flat, shake - textured concrete tile or asphalt shingle roof material with standing metal seam accents. 4. Entry porch with ornate, refined columns and brackets. 5. Colorful lap siding with shingle accents and white or contrasting trim. 6. Wide fascia boards, cornice details and spindle work. Doors: Paneled wood to compliment the style. Enhanced trim and windows are encouraged. Garage: Will be consistent and compliment the architectural style. Roll - up doors with windows are encouraged. Materials and Color: Lap or horizontal board siding with shingle accents. Gable end detailing. Bright and vibrant contrasting ornamental detail. Porches and Balconies: Covered front porches with ornate detailing. Rear and Side Articulation: Will be enhanced on homes with rear and side public views. Roofs: Front -to -back gable or hip roof with intersecting turrets and dormers, as well as gable, forms. Very steep pitches from 8:12 to 10:12. Flat concrete tile roofing with occasional accents. 17 overhangs. Windows: Multi - divisioned single or double -hung with wood trim. Shutters may be used on occasion are common. Hidde ��il s U S T A T L S DESIGN GUIDELINES: TTM 30434 VICTORIAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE colors with hip, and shed standing -seam . Bay windows 53 PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08 -0281, A RESIDENTIAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP WITH PHASING PLAN (TTM NO. 30434) PROPOSING TO SUBDIVIDE 31.86 GROSS ACRES INTO 16 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, EACH WITH A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 1 NET ACRES, AND 1 OPEN SPACE LOT. THE PROJECT IS PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN 3 PHASES. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE ARE ALSO PROPOSED. THE PROJECT IS GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD APPROXIMATELY 3,000 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD (ACROSS FROM THE TEMECULA PUBLIC LIBRARY), AND ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF SANTIAGO ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 3,800 FEET EAST OF YNEZ ROAD (APNS 945- 090 -001, 945 -090 -020, AND 945- 100 -005). Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On December 11, 2008, Naron Pacific resubmitted Planning Application No. PA02 -0193, which was re -named as Planning Application No. PA08 -0281, Tentative Tract Map with Phasing Plan and Design Guidelines Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 4, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08 -0281 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; Tentative Tract Map No. 30434 is consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, and the Municipal Code. The project meets the requirements of the L -1 zoning designation, the Chaparral Overlay Area requirements of the General Plan, as well as the Subdivision Ordinance requirements for Tentative Maps. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965; The project site does not have an agricultural zoning designation by the City of Temecula, and the site is not regulated by a Williamson Act contract: therefore the subject project will not result in the cancellation of a Williamson Contract. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map; The project consists of 16 residential lots and 1 open space lot on property designated for low density residential uses within the Chaparral Area overlay, which is consistent with the General Plan, as well as, the development standards for the L -1 zoning designation. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, will not be likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; A Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan have been prepared for the project, which addresses environmental impacts on the site. Mitigation measures (described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program) and the Conditions of Approval have been incorporated to reduce any potential impacts to fish, wildlife or their habitat to less than significant levels. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; The project has been reviewed by the Fire Prevention Division and the Building and Safety Division. The project has been designed and conditioned to address their requirements. Further, provisions are made in the General Plan and the Development Code to ensure that the public health, safety and welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent with these policies. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior to the construction of single- family residences the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy conservation. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; All required rights -of -way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed division of land and adequate conditions and /or modifications have been made to the Tentative Tract Map. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby); The project will be required to pay Quimby fees pursuant to the Temecula Subdivision Ordinance Section 16.33. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Tentative Tract Map Application, PA08 -0281: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map Application, as described in the Initial Study ( "the Project "). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on March 28, 2011, and expired on May 3, 2011. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. C. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the May 4, 2011 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. D. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA08 -0281, Residential Tentative Tract Map with Phasing Plan and Design Guidelines (TTM No. 30434) proposing to subdivide 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential lots, each with a minimum lot size of 1 net acres, and 1 open space lot, located along the south side of Pauba Road approximately 3,000 feet west of Margarita Road (across from the Temecula Public Library), and along the north side of Santiago Road, approximately 3,800 feet east of Ynez Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4 day of May 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4 day of May 2011, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA08 -0281 Project Description: Assessor's Parcel Nos.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Approval Date: May 5, 2011 Expiration Date: May 5, 2014 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. A Residential Tentative Tract Map with Phasing Plan (TTM No. 30434) proposing to subdivide 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential lots, each with a minimum lot size of 1 net acres, and 1 open space lot. The project is proposed to be constructed in 3 phases. Design Guidelines for future development on the site are also proposed. The project is generally located along the south side of Pauba Road approximately 3,000 feet west of Margarita Road (across from the Temecula Public Library), and along the north side of Santiago Road, approximately 3,800 feet east of Ynez Road. 945 - 090 -001, 945 - 090 -020, and 945- 100 -005 Residential Residential - Detached Residential - Single Family The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand One Hundred and Eight Dollars ($2,108.00) which includes the Two Thousand Forty -Four Dollar ($2,044.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty -Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 5 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Tentative Map, Phasing Plan and Design Guidelines contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. The project and subsequent project shall comply with all Mitigation Measures included in the Mitigation and Monitoring Program. PL -8. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -9. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -10. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. PL -11. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. An Extension of Time may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date. PL -12. A Homeowners Association may not be terminated without prior City approval. PL -13. The applicant shall revise the Conceptual Landscape Plans and Figure 18 of the Design Guidelines to clarify that the landscape slopes that slope down /away from Lot 3 will be maintained by the HOA. Individual property owners would be responsible for all other planting maintenance. PL -14. The applicant shall revise the Conceptual Wall /Fence Plans and Figure 9 of the Design Guidelines to clearly indicate that the vinyl fencing will be view fences not solid fences. PL -15. The applicant shall revise the Typical Planting Palette, Figure 19 of the Design Guidelines, to provide a broader palette of trees and shrubs. PL -16. The address monuments shall not conflict with sight distance requirements. PL -17. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL -18. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. PL -19. All parkways, including within the right -of -way, landscaping, detention basins, open space, walls and fencing, shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. PL -20. The CC &Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Temecula Community Services District. PL -21. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing streetlights shall be paid for by the developer. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL -22. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL -23. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -24. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. PL -25. Implement the following Mitigation Measures (include as Notes on Grading Plan): a. AirQuall : Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas. b. AirQual2: c. AirQual3: d. AirQual4: e. AirQualS: f. AirQual6: g. AirQual7: h. AirQual8: i. AirQual9: J. AirQua110: k. AirQuall1: I. AirQuall2: m. Bio2: Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Prepare a high wind dust control plan and implement plan elements and terminate soil disturbance when winds exceed 25 mph. Stabilize previously disturbed areas if subsequent construction is delayed. Water exposed surfaces 3 times /day and limit on -site travel speeds to less than 15 mph. Cover all stockpiles with tarps if left undisturbed for more than 72 hours. Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as soon as feasible. Provide adequate water spray at truck drops and compaction surfaces during fill placement. Require 90 day low NOx tune -ups for off -road equipment. Limit allowable idling to 5 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment. Utilize equipment whose engines are equipped with diesel oxidation catalysts if available. Utilize diesel particulate filters on heavy equipment where feasible. Use low VOC coatings and high pressure -low volume sprayers Resource Agency permits shall be obtained and copies provided to the City prior to the issuance of grading permits for the Santiago Roadway Improvements or construction of Phase 2 or 3 of the project, whichever occurs first PL -26. Implement the following Mitigation Measures (include as Notes or incorporate into Building and /or Landscape Plans, as appropriate): a. GHG 1: New residential building shall be constructed to meet California Title 24 energy efficiency requirements b. GHG 2: New appliances and equipment for the residential buildings shall meet Energy Star Certification c. GHG 3: Landscape maintenance shall implement green waste and recycling d. GHG 4: Landscaping shall include low water requirements and fast growth e. GHG 5: Trees and vegetation shall be planted to shade buildings and thus reduce heating /cooling demand and to sequester carbon f. Bio 1: g. Bio3: All graded areas shall be revegetated with California native plant species that are drought tolerant, fire retardant, erosion controlling and habitat providing. A minimum of 0.26 acres ( +/ -5:1 ratio) of revegetation /habitat creation within the channel and /or banks shall be achieved. Provide City will documentation from Resource Agencies that this has been completed. h. Project specific noise impact analysis shall be submitted with an application for Residential Product Review (Development Plan) for merchant built tract or upon submittal of building permits for custom homes on Lots 1 -3 and /or Lots 12 -16. PL -27. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended bythese conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -28. Construction Landscape Plans shall include the following: a. A note indicating the location of shrubs b. A broader palette of trees and shrubs PL -29. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -30. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -31. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long -term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL -32. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify irrigation installation with open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head - to -head coverage, and to verify that all planting have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicantlowner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -33. Specification of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify irrigation installation with open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head -to -head coverage, and to verifythat all planting have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -34. Automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right -of -way and, all landscaping excluding Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. PL -35. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, it shall be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. PL -36. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans, or as modified herein. PL -37. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. PL -38. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -39. Roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. PL -40. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three -foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after - thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL -41. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. PL -42. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional streetlights, whichever occurs first, the developer shall complete the Temecula Community Services District application, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan, and pay the advanced energy fees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -43. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his /her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL -44. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL -45. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. PL -46. HOA landscaping, including parkways, shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. PL -47. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL -48. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map PL -49. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. PL -50. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. This project shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program. c. The open space lot shall remain open space and no development is permitted within this lot. PL -51. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC &Rs) shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. The CC &Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, private roads, and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. PL -52. The CC &Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Planning Director, City Engineer and the City Attorney and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. PL -53. The CC &Rs shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. PL -54. The CC &Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. PL -55. The CC &Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and facilities. PL -56. The CC &Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. PL -57. The CC &Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. PL -58. The CC &Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC &Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC &Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. PL -59. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC &Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. PL -60. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC &Rs shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of building permits. PL -61. CC &Rs shall include the Design Guidelines. PL -62. An Article must be added to every set of CC &Rs to read as follows: Article CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA 1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number 30434 requires the City to review and approve the CC &Rs for the Parcel. 2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC &Rs and that its review is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC &Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC &Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC &Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural matters. 3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State, or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC &Rs, the provisions of the Conditions of Approval and Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, and regulations shall prevail, notwithstanding the language of the CC &Rs. 4. These CC &Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Planning Director of the City of Temecula. PL -63. An Article must be added to every set of CC &Rs, following the Declarant's signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 30434 require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC &Rs for the Parcel. The City's review of these CC &Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC &Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC &Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC &Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, PL -64. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC &Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and /or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC &Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. PL -65. CC &Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. PL -66. Three copies of the final recorded CC &Rs shall be provided to the Planning Department. PL -67. The developer shall satisfythe City's parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in -lieu fees of 0.25 acres, based upon the City's then current land evaluation. OUTSIDE AGENCIES enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC &Rs. Patrick Richardson Planning Director Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney PL -68. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittals dated August 4, 2010, May 18, 2010, December 23, 2008, and November 14, 2008, copies of which are attached. PL -69. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in Southern California Gas's transmittal dated July 7, 2010, a copy of which is attached. PL -70. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated May 27, 2010, a copy of which is attached. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F -1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F -2. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1,500 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 2 -hour duration (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -3. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on -site and offsite 6" x 4" x 2 -2 1 /" outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -4. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on -site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official (CFC Chapter 5). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F -5. Maximum cul -de -sac- length shall not exceed 1,320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul -de -sac shall be a minimum of 37- feet for residential (CFC Chapter 5 along with Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -6. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all- weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -7. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -8. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -9. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F -10. The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on -site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14 and Chapter 5). F -11. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F -12. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -13. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Single family residences and multi - family residential units shall have 4 -inch letters and /or numbers, as approved bythe Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -14. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval when building plans are submitted for the homes. Fire sprinklers for single family dwelling s are now required by state law regardless of square footage. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed bythe developer at no cost to any Government Agency. PW -2. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the Tentative Tract Map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -3. The Project is proposed to be developed in three phases. a. Tentative Tract Map No. 30434 -1 consists of three (3) lots that take access off Pauba Road; b. Tentative Tract Map No. 30434 -2 consists of eight (8) lots that take access off the extension Via Valencia; and the c. Tentative Tract Map No. 30434 consists of five (5) lots that take access off a private road on Santiago Road. PW -4. A Grading Permit for rough and /or precise grading, including all on -site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City- maintained street rights -of -way. PW -5. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right -of -way. PW -6. All grading and improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW -7. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls into the design of the project to prevent non - permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm drain system or receiving water during all field - related activities. PW -8. A Master Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the entire development has been conceptually accepted by the City and shall be finalized by a registered civil engineer and shall include Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management Practices (BMPs), source controls, and treatment devices. PW -9. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. Prior to approval of each Tract Map, the developer shall complete or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed, and securities posted. PW -10. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Army Corps of Engineers c. California Department of Fish and Game d. Rancho California Water District e. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District f. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau g. Planning Department h. Riverside County Health Department i. Community Services District j. Verizon k. Southern California Edison Company and I. Southern California Gas Company PW -11. The developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following public and private improvements outlined in these conditions to the City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. a. Tract Map No. 30434 -1 i. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ii. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS iii. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right -of -way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. b. Tract Map No. 30434 -2 i. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS ii. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right -of -way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections c. Tract Map No. 30434 1. Improve Pauba Road (Secondary Arterial (4 lanes undivided) Highway Standard No. 102 -88' Right -of -Way) to include dedication of half -width street right -of -way, installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 1. Improve 'A' Street (Private Street - 34' Right -of- Easement) to include installation of full -width street improvements, paving, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water) 1. Improve 'B' Street (Private Street - 38' R /E) to include installation of full -width street improvements, paving, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water). i. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 1. Improve Santiago Road from the easterly property boundary to the westerly property boundary (Limited Secondary Arterial (2 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 1028 — 88' Right -of -Way) to include dedication of half -width street right -of -way, installation of street improvements, paving, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water), 2. A watershed analysis shall be prepared to determine the 100 year floodplain water surface elevation. The centerline profile elevation for Santiago Road shall be above the determined 100 year floodplain water surface elevation. The study should also include channel PW -12. PW -14. design, including, but not limited to upstream and downstream protection and channel mitigations. 3. Improve full width of the channel along Santiago Road to include, but not limited to, upstream and downstream protection and channel mitigations. ii. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS 1. Improve 'C' Street (Private Street - 38' R /E) to include installation of full -width street improvements, paving, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water). iii. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right -of -way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. Unless otherwise approved, all criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans. a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00° minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Number 207. c. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets and shall be designed in accordance with City Standards Number 800. d. Concrete sidewalk shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Number 400. e. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties. f. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City Standard Number 113. g. All reverse curves shall include a 100 -foot minimum tangent section. h. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. i. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut -off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. j. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right -of -way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and the utility provider. PW -13. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 34kv or greater, shall be installed underground. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Cul -de -sac geometries shall meet current City standards. PW -15. PW -16. PW -17. PW -18. PW -19. PW -21. PW -23. b. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii should be identified on the site plan). c. All intersections shall be perpendicular to 90 degrees. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed bya registered civil engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Pauba Road on the Tract Map No. 30434 -1 with the exception of one (1) opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Santiago Road on the Tract Map No. 30434 with the exception of one (1) opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard Number 805. All easements and /or right -of -way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. PW -20. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. PW -22. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the Tract Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred bythe Cityto acquire the off site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. PW -24. The developer shall notify the City's cable TV franchisees of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards at time of street improvements. PW -25. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the Tract Map. PW -26. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On -site drainage facilities located outside of road right -of -way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW -27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must receive final acceptance by the City prior to issuance of any grading permit. PW -28. PW -30. The extent of earthwork activity /grading has not been identified for each proposed phase, therefore, ensuing grading plan(s) for each Tract shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The plan(s) shall include offsite grading and associated drainage, temporary and /or permanent post construction water qualityfacilities that are directly associated with the runoff from each Tract, and erosion and sediment control measures implemented during and following each phase of construction. Subsequently, regulatory agency clearances shall be obtained. PW -29. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Army Corps of Engineers c. California Department of Fish and Game d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District e. Planning Department f. Riverside County Health Department g. Community Services District h. Verizon i. Southern California Edison Company j. Southern California Gas Company, or other affected agencies A Grading Plan(s) shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The Grading Plan(s) shall include all necessary erosion and sediment control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion and sediment discharges. PW -31. Santiago Road channel improvement plans shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval. PW -32. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall PW -33. PW -34. PW -35. PW -36. PW -38. PW -39. PW -40. address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off site or on -site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate ouffall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of 100 years. Construction -phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (VVDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. PW -37. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading, erosion and sediment control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. The developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. PW -41. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW -42. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit in each Tract Map, respective Tract Map shall be approved and recorded. PW -43. Precise Grading Plan(s) shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation, and the soils engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW -44. PW -45. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan(s), the conditions of the Grading Permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The developer shall construct all public and private improvements outlined in these conditions to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. a. Tract Map No. 30434 -1 — Prior to issuance of the first building permit: i. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 1. Improve Pauba Road (Secondary Arterial (4 lanes undivided) Highway Standard No. 102 -88' Right -of -Way) to include dedication of half -width street right -of -way, installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). ii. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS 1. Improve 'A' Street (Private Street - 34' Right -of- Easement) to include installation of full -width street improvements, paving, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water) iii. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right -of -way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. b. Tract Map No. 30434 -2 - Prior to issuance of the first building permit: i. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS 1. Improve 'B' Street (Private Street - 38' RIE) to include installation of full -width street improvements, paving, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water). ii. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right -of -way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections c. Tract Map No. 30434 - Prior to issuance of the first building permit:: PW -46. PW -47. PW -48. PW -49. i. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 1. Improve Santiago Road from the easterly property boundary to the westerly property boundary (Limited Secondary Arterial (2 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 102B — 88' Right -of -Way) to include dedication of half -width street right -of -way, installation of street improvements, paving, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water), 2. A watershed analysis shall be prepared to determine the 100 year floodplain water surface elevation. The centerline profile elevation for Santiago Road shall be above the determined 100 year floodplain water surface elevation. The study should also include channel design, to include, but not be limited to upstream and downstream protection and channel mitigations. 3. Improve full width of the channel along Santiago Road to include, but not limited to, upstream and downstream protection and channel mitigations. ii. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS 1. Improve 'C' Street (Private Street - 38' R /E) to include installation of full -width street improvements, paving, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water). iii. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right -of -way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (DIF) as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. The developer shall construct all public improvements outlined in these conditions to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. Each Tract shall demonstrate that the temporary and /or permanent post construction water quality facilities associated with its respective runoff have been installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. PW -50. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, or other affected agencies. PW -51. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. PW -52. All public and private improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -53. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 1. 6 II d,> me BY: Ade RIVERSIOE COUNTY COMMUNITY 1-1EA1._T1 -1 AGENCY 4 4 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION & OVERSIGHT DIVISION TENTATIVE MAP PRELIMINARY CLEARANCE (SAN -53) DATE: N 4 u1 a o la PARCELS / LOTS: 1 t 10 ZONING: L MAP SCHEDULE: H TRACT / PARCEL MAP NO.: . 7 0 9 3 APN: 9`IS_- 69e -b °I d ©tea 94S -ib0 - 00s AT THIS TIME, DEH DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE CONSIDERATION OF THIS MAP. FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED AT SPECIFIC MILESTONES. DOMESTIC WATER: THE RR4C 1,6 C`` I ■-( -; ■e-■ WATER DISTRICT HAS AGREED IN WRITING TO FURNISH DOMESTIC WATER TO EACH AND EVERY LOT WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION AS PER LETTER DATED c2 7 / d 0!0 ❑ ACCEPTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT APPLICATION IS ON FILE WITH THIS DEPARTMENT TO FORM THE WATER COMPANY. ❑ NO WATER SYSTEM IS PROVIDED FOR THIS LAND DIVISION. (SCHEDULE C, D, E, F, G ) ❑ INDIVIDUAL WELL(S) 2. DOMESTIC SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ❑ CONNECTION TO SEWER SYSTEM AS PER LETTER DATED NSITE WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM REPORT PROJECT NO. 3J3 e-t TED 6 Apra l o715/e HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. THE REPORT SHOULD BE NSISTENT WITH THE DEPARTMENTS TECHNICAL MANUAL. FURTHER INFORMATION AND OR STING MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE: CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL ARD CLEARANCE MAY BE REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:/ -/ Lam, S 0 :/S � c� , /pC 5A rev/de e77: 3 5 f, `'Yt w here > 2 F4- f - /1 , s Goo u. -x 1 e ; si 46% e_ se le_ pr k/ CIPLA, 140 t3 m, 7*'! Id/A, /1'� »s" . I 4G7 St1 f et 1 4721.-di 4 Ali esed �� a S r Zara ,�1. P- `1 4.101 8- 7 deli s ,IA.a 1 1 be- eel.) p u$4-- uddres ei �;rre o r dest e5 1 S rD b Wt' ter rer'm X11 6e F�►p�P� f ro�� n taScer� . b'I 5'0a I s c'e. DOH- SAN -053 (Rev 7/10) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST 0 /9-x= 13a44101, t-1/1. f . eco, 1,04 - ' p iv °t r ter% "' and per- -}e s d ah- 5 ' he . e IS • TO: CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMEN ATTN: Cheryl Kitzerow/ Matt Peters FROM: GREGOR DELLENBACH, Environmental Healt RE: TRACT MAP NO. 30434 PA08 -0281 APN GD:gd (951) 955.8980 County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL 1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Tract Map for this project . tot make any recommendations until a sanitation letter if filed. The requirements for a SAN 53 letter are as follows: a) A satisfactory soils percolation test to prove the project feasible. (NOT INCLUDED IN SUBMITTAL and a C -42 certification for the existing residence) b) A clearance letter from the appropriate California Regional Water Quality control Board. NOTE: For projects within the San Diego Water Quality Control Board sphere of influence, a written clearance shall be required PRIOR to issuance of a SAN 53.(NOT REQUIRED) c) Two copies of the tract map. d) A "will- serve" letter from the agency /agencies serving potable water. 2. Should the project be served sanitary sewer services, this Department would need only: a) A "will- serve" letter from the agency /agencies serving potable water and sanitary sewers. b) One copy of the tentative map. 3. If the project is to be served water by existing wells, pumps and water tanks, a water supply permit will be required (contact the Department of Environmental Health, Engineering Section) at (951) 955.8980. The requirements for a water supply permit are as follows: a) Satisfactory laboratory tests (bacteriological, organic, inorganic, general physical, and general mineral) to prove the water potable. b) A complete set of plans showing all details of the proposed and existing water systems: sizes and types of pipe and calculations showing that adequate quantity and pressure can be maintained (California Waterworks Standards - California Health and Safety Code and California Administrative Code, Title 22). These plans must be signed by a registered civil engineer. December 23, 2008 COL.v 'Y OF RIVERSIDE • COMMLiiTY HEALTH AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH City of Temecula c/o Cheryl Kitzerow /Matt Peters Jim Paine Map Temcula, CA 92589 -9033 To Whom It May Concern: RE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30434 PA08 -0281 (18 Residential Lots and 2 Open Space Lots) This Department will permit domestic sewage disposal from the individual lots at this subdivision as per a percolation report by the AM/PAC and Associates, Inc. For each 100 gallons of septic tank capacity, 4.0 gallons /ssquare foot/day below the inlet for seepage pits only.. When grading is required, the soils engineer (George H. Hawes, RPE) must assume theoretical cuts, fills, compaction, etc., and perform the tests and borings at the necessary subsurface sewage disposal system depths. PRIOR TO ANY GRADING, the soils engineer must provide a grading plan for review and approval which shall include and address the following: a) The proposed cuts and/or fills in the areas of subsurface sewage disposal system. b) The sewage system and it's 100% expansion area, placed in natural undisturbed soil. c) The elevation of the individual building pads in reference to the elevation of the disposal system. On those projects where the grading plans are prepared by other than the person preparing the soils feasibility report, a statement must be included on the grading plan submitted for review and approval with the soils engineer's signature and seal as to the appropriateness of the grading with regard to the conclusions and recommendations set forth in the soils engineer's feasibility report. If the final grading exceeds the soils engineer's estimate by more than two feet, additional reports may be required. At the completion of final grading, or prior to any construction, the soils engineer of record shall review all subsurface sewage disposal data to include previous soils feasibility reports and confirm with his signature and seal on the final grading plan, that the previous design parameters have been adhered to and that the subsurface sewage disposal systems recommendations remain valid with regard to previous requirement details for each sewage disposal system. A copy of the final grading plan, on a scale not smaller than 1 " =40' maximum with detailed subsurface sewage disposal data to include 100% expansion, shall be submitted for review and approval. Local Enforcement Agency 90; Box Land Use and Water Engineering PO_ E>> 1206 a isi5r .0 5' . FAX 9 9653 * 4080 Lr'mon 9t.lb. 9 .l( Floor Ri ersr:ie. C? 92E4)1 55- 8y`).' 4.080 Lemon Sty y et. 2 d Floor. Riverside, C0 92501 December 23, 2008 Page 2 The size of the septic tank and effluent disposal area shall be determined based upon the bedrooms or number of waste fixtures of each individual lot. There shall be an unoccupied area on each lot where sewage disposal, as required above, may be installed in conformance with the current Uniform Plumbing Code and Department of Environmental Health Technical Manual. There shall be an additional unoccupied area equal to 100 percent of the above required sewage disposal systems for sewage disposal installation in case of failure. However, sewage disposal systems are considered temporary and if sewage lines of a sewer district become available, connection to the system should be made at that time. Gregor Dellenbach Enviromental Health Specialist (951) 955 -8980 2 DATE: PI N` "e'"' b`e" 2 (:),.),g PARCELS/LOTS: 1 RE: SUBDIVISION NO. 7772-- 3t' y 3 ZONING: L — 1 PARCEL MAP NO, MAP SCHEDULE: 13 MOBILEHOME, T.T., R.V., PARK OTHER: THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVES: . DOMESTIC WATER: THE I"C I " ° Cd' I ' r "' r" ' `' WATER DISTRICT HAS AGREED IN WRITING TO FURNISH DOMESTIC WATER TO EACH AND EVERY LOT WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION AS PER LETTER DATED .30 o?od 1 . BY ❑ AN ACCEPTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT APPLICATION IS ON FILE WITH THIS DEPARTMENT TO FORM THE WATER COMPANY. ❑ NO WATER SYSTEM IS PROVIDED FOR THIS LAND DIVISION. (CLASS C. CLASS D, OTHER SUBDIVISION •) ❑ INDIVIDUAL WELL(S) . DOMESTIC SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ❑ CONNECTION TO SEWER SYSTEM AS PER LETTER DATED 141 SEPTIC TANKS WITH: SOILS FEASIBILITY TEST BY Th.61 56; i S CD • I /n C- . JOB/PROJECT # 3Z-3 201 , D 1 DATED ' cZ 3 April aac 5dB. SEPTIC TANKS WITH: WESTERN/EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY AREA SOIL SURVEY MAP BOOK. 1. LEACH LINES WITH SQ. FEET OF BOTTOM AREA/100 GALLONS OF SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY. 2. SEEPAGE PITS WITH L i GAL /SQ. FT/DAY OR VERT. FT. (5' DIA.) VERT. FT. (6' DIA.) PER 100 GALLONS OF SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY. ❑ C. DRY SEWERS SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR THIS PROJECT (SEC. 12.1, ART XII, ORD. 460.105) ❑ D. APPROVED RECLAIMED WATER WILL BE UTILIZED AT THIS DEVELOPMENT. i . CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD REGION: APPROVAL LETTER DATED INITIAL/FINAL CLEARANCE. 1 . SUPPLEMENTAL WATER/SEWER DATA ❑ REQUIRED REMARKS: AV ;NOW i%fffJ WON ed b Distribution: WHITE — Applicant; CANARY —File; MINK—Water Quality Control Board ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST DOH -SAN -053 (Rev 3/03) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT FA 3 t/ efna 3 6) 'Cf. M The Gas Company- A *Sempra Energy' company July 7, 2010 The Legacy Group, Inc. 43224 Ormsby Road Temecula, CA 92592 Re: TTM 30434, Riverside County Imcmgv as PA , 201 BY: -------------- - - - - -- Southern California Gas Company- Transmission Department (The Gas Company) has received your request for the requirements within the Southern California Gas Company Easement. The Gas Company operates and maintains a 30 -Inch high pressure natural gas line, a 24 -Inch high pressure natural gas line, and a 16 -Inch high pressure natural gas line within the limits of your proposed tract. The Gas Company will approve the construction over our Gas Lines provided the line is protected in place and the following design parameters are strictly adhered to. Design parameters for The Gas Company shall include: • Consideration be given to the safety of our pipeline during the design and construction stages. • No mechanical equipment will be permitted to operate within three horizontal feet of the pipeline, and any closer work must be done by hand. No heavy equipment to cross pipeline without Gas Company Representative's approval. • A representative of The Gas Company must observe the excavation around or near our facilities to insure protection and to record pertinent data necessary for our operations. • Vertical clearance of at least two (2) feet between High Pressure Gas Facilities and any substructure crossing, and all laterals must cross perpendicular to the gas facilities. • All equipment crossing gas easement must be approved by the Gas Company Representative, and all crossings require a minimum of seven (7) feet of cover over gas facilities. • Only rubber tire, light loading equipment will be allowed to work within the Gas Company Easement and no mechanical equipment will be permitted to operate within two (2) vertical feet of the pipeline. Any closer work must be performed by hand. Southern California Gas Company Beaumont District 251 East 1st Street Beaumont, CA 92223 -2903 Tel: 909.845.2617 Southern Califomia Gas Company 9400 Oakdale Avenue Chatsworth, CA 91313 Mailing Address: P. O. Box 2300 Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2300 ML9314 tel 818- 701 -4546 fax 818- 701 -3441 • A Construction Note to be placed on plans requiring Notification of Gas Company Representative prior to any work within the Gas Company Easement. • A Caution Note to be placed on plans stating, "Caution, High Pressure Gas Line, Do Not Disturb ", at each proposed crossing. • No Change of Grade within Gas Company Easement without Gas Company's approval. No permanent structures within easement without Gas Company approval. • Horizontal clearance of at least ten (10) feet between High Pressure Gas Facilities and any parallel substructure. • A Right of Way Encroachment Agreement must be in place prior to any work being performed across the existing Gas Company Easement. • No deep rooted trees or shrubs within Gas Company Easement, however, grass, paving and irrigation systems are permitted. Should a re- location of the gas lines be necessary, a minimum of 6 months will be required in order to review, design, procure materials, construct and complete the re- locations. Any re- location is also subject to being up to 100% collectible. Upon request, at least two (2) working days prior to the start of construction, we will locate and mark our active underground facilities for the contractor at no cost. Please call Underground Service Alert (USA) at (800) 422 -4133. Arrangements for someone to stand -by and observe can be made by calling (951) 845 -0712 two working days prior to the start of construction. We would appreciate it if you would place a note on your plans to that effect. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (951) 845 -0709. Sincerely, Tim A. Pearce Transmission Project Manager - JUFI, iV. LVIV IL:VLrm Y7IOLt2V!OY to. II)Y r. !/Y 0 F— 'r M A ec wz � ��V h tku G ov � �~ 0 w ; lEcc - u un. IV. LVIU IL :ULrm Y)I04)UIDY No. IIS9 r. di YEMINIo Iz Cr:;4N W � ti Nit O� 0 w al i f 0 trj a dun. iu. Lulu iL:ucrm Y)IO'+7ulOY h pD NO. 117Y r. Y/Y M •!3 00 V s o 1 ti Who Water Board of Directors Lisa D. Herman President Lawrence M. Liheu Sr. Vice President Stephen J. Corona Ralph 11. Daily Ben R. Drake John E. Hoagland Wililam E. Plummer Officers Matthew G. Stone General Manager Jeffrey D. Armstrong Chief Financial OfficerlTreasurer N. Craig Elitharp, P.E. Director of Operations & Maintenance Perry R. Louck Director of Planning Andrew L. Webster, P.B. Chief Engineer Kell; E. Garcia District Secretary C. Michael Cowett Beat Beat & Krieger LLP General Counsel May 27, 2010 Cheryl Kitzerow, Project Planner City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY - TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 30434 PARCELS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8840; PARCEL NO. 10 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6607; APNS 945 -090- 001, 945- 090 -002, AND 945 - 100 -005; CITY PROJECT NO. PA- 08 -0281 [JIM PAYNE] Dear Cheryl: Please be advised that the above - referenced project/property is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). The subject project/property fronts an existing 12 -inch diameter PVC water pipeline (1380 Pressure Zone) within Pauba Road, and an existing 12 -inch diameter CML &C water pipeline (1485 Pressure Zone) within Santiago Road. Water service to the subject project /property does not exist. Additions or modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Where private (on -site) facilities are required for water service, fire protection, irrigation, or other purposes, RCWD requires recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for such on -site private facilities, where private on- site water facilities may cross (or may be shared amongst) multiple lots/project units, and/or where such `common' facilities may be owned and maintained by a Property Owners' Association (proposed now or in the future). Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing of the subject project/property development relative to water supply shortage contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances). As soon as feasible, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project - specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project - specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. Rancho California Water District 42155 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula. California 92589 - 9017 • (951) 296 • FAX (951) 296 - 5860 wwwranehowater.com Letter to Cheryl Kitzerow/City of Temecula May 27, 2010 Page Two Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Peter Muserelli Engineering Project Coordinator cc: Corey Wallace, Engineering Manager Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor 10\PM:lin008\FEG Rancho California Water District 42136. Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, Calarnia 926e8-9017" • (951) 296-6900 • FAX(951)296-6860 www.ranchowater.com Rancho Wathr Board of Directors Lisa D. Herman President Lawrence M. Libeu Sr. Vice President Stephen J. Corona Ralph H. Daily Ben R. Drake John E. Hoagland William E. Plummer Officers Matthew G. Stone (ieneral Manager .Jeffrey D. Armstrong Chief Financial Officer/Treasure N. Craig Elitharp, P.E. Director of Operations Y. SIaintenance Perry R. Louck Director of Planning Andrew L. Webster. P.E. Chief Itnaniccr Kelli E. Garcia District Secretors C. Michael Cow ett Best Best & Krieger LLP General CounS& May 27, 2010 Cheryl Kitzerow, Project Planner City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Dear Cheryl: SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY - TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 30434 PARCELS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8840; PARCEL NO. 10 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6607; APNS 945 -090- 001, 945- 090 -002, AND 945 -100 -005; CITY PROJECT NO. PA- 08 -0281 [JIM PAYNE] Please be advised that the above - referenced project/property is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). The subject project /property fronts an existing 12 -inch diameter PVC water pipeline (1380 Pressure Zone) within Pauba Road, and an existing 12 -inch diameter CML &C water pipeline (1485 Pressure Zone) within Santiago Road. Water service to the subject project /property does not exist. Additions or modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Where private (on -site) facilities are required for water service, fire protection, irrigation, or other purposes, RCWD requires recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for such on -site private facilities, where private on- site water facilities may cross (or may be shared amongst) multiple lots /project units, and /or where such `common' facilities may be owned and maintained by a Property Owners' Association (proposed now or in the future). Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing of the subject project/property development relative to water supply shortage contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances). As soon as feasible, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project- specific demands and /or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project- specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. Rancho California Water District 12135 &i nche.ster Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589 -9017 • (951) 299 -6900 • FAX (951) 296 -6860 www ranchowater.cnm Letter to Cheryl Kitzerow /City of Temecula May 27, 2010 Page Two Sewer service to the subject project /property, if available, would be Water District. If you should have any questions or need additional information, Services Representative at this office at (951) 296 -6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Peter Muserelli Engineering Project Coordinator cc: Corey Wallace, Engineering Manager Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor 1 O \PM:1m008 \FEG provided by Eastern Municipal please contact an Engineering Rancho California Water District 12135 SW Road • Yost Vffice Box 901' • Temecula, Califci1 is 92589 -9017 • '951 i 296 -6900 • FAX (951, 296 -6860 www.ranchowater . com seql;i City of Temecula Planning Department Notice of Proposed Negative Declaration PROJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: PA08 -0281, TTM No. 30434 (Paine Map /Hidden Hills) Larry Slusser on behalf of Noel Paine This project is generally located along the south side of Pauba Road approximately 3,000 feet west of Margarita Road (across from the Temecula Public Library), and along the north side of Santiago Road, approximately 3,800 feet east of Ynez Road. DESCRIPTION: This project is a Residential Tentative Tract Map with Phasing Plan (TTM No. 30434) proposing to subdivide 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential lots, each with a minimum lot size of 1 net acres, and 1 open space lot totaling 7.06 acres to preserve an on -site riverine area /blue -line stream. Design Guidelines for future development on the site are also proposed for the project. The site is currently vacant, yet disturbed by various off -road vehicle trails. The proposed 16 lots at a density of 0.50 dwelling units per acre (du /ac) is consistent with the density requirements of the low density residential designation of 0.5 to 2.9 du /ac. Access to the project would be provided via Pauba Road (improved), Santiago Road (to be improved with project), and an extension of Via Valencia (improved private cul -de- sac to be modified). Santiago Road is required to be improved along the project frontage and transition with the existing roadway to the west to meet City standards. A 35 -foot wide section of the Santiago Road right -of -way will be paved with asphalt concrete materials along the southern project boundary. At the southwest corner of the site, the width of Santiago Road will widen from 24 feet to 35 feet over a 250 foot Fong transition to connect with the existing paved portion of the road. The off-site improvements involve a 348 foot long section of Santiago Road located approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of John Warner Road and Via Valencia. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program which is attached to this Notice and will be included as part of the Negative Declaration for this project. The Comment Period for this proposed Negative Declaration is March 28, 2011 to May 3, 2011. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033. City Hall is located at 41000 Main Street. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Negative Declaration is provided through: X The Local Newspaper _ Posting the Site X Notice to Adjacent Property Owners If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact Cheryl Kitzerow at (951) 694-6 ► • Prepared by: ��.�ih..'r Chervl Kitzerow, Associate Planner (Signatu " �1 (Name and Title) Notice of Completion & Environmental Document Transmittal Mail to: State Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812 -3044 (916) 445 -0613 For Hand Delivery /Street Address: 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 Project Title: PA08 -0281, TTM No. 30434 (Paine Map /Hidden Hills Estates) Lead Agency: City of Temecula Mailing Address: 41000 Main Street City: Temecula Project Location: County: Riverside City/Nearest Community: Temecula Cross Streets: Santiago/Ynez and Pauba /Margarita Longitude /Latitude (degrees, minutes and seconds): 33 ° 29 Assessor's Parcel No.: 945090001, 945090020, 945100005 Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 1 -15, 79S Airports: N/A Document Type: CEQA: ❑ NOP ❑ Early Cons ❑ Neg Dec Mit Neg Dec Local Action Type: ❑ General Plan Update ❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ General Plan Element ❑ Community Plan 0 Project lssues Discussed 0 ❑ Agricultural Land Air Quality Archeological /Historical Biological Resources ❑ Coastal Zone ❑ Drainage /Absorption ❑ Economic /Jobs 0 0 0 Aesthetic/Visual ❑ Draft EIR ❑ Supplement/Subsequent E1R (Prior SCH No.) Other: in Document: ❑ Fiscal ❑ Flood Plain /Flooding ❑ Forest Land/Fire Hazard Geologic /Seismic ❑ Minerals Noise Population/Housing Balance Public Services /Facilities 0 51 0 51 Specific Plan Master Plan Planned Unit Development Site Plan Contact Person: Cheryl Kitzerow Phone: 951 - 694 - 6409 Zip: 92589 County: Riverside 38.6 „ N / 117 ° 7 , 28.6 „ W Total Acres: 31.86 Section: 7 and 8 Twp.: 8 South Range: 2 West Base: USGS Waterways: Temecula and Murrieta Creeks Railways: N/A Schools: Yes 0 0 NEPA: ❑ NOI ❑ EA ❑ Draft EIS ❑ EONS! ❑ Rezone ❑ Prezone ❑ Use Permit Land Division (Subdivision, etc.) 0 Present Land Use /Zoning /General Plan Designation: General Plan - Low Density Residential; Zoning - L -1 single family residential Project Description: (please use a separate page if necessary) See attached. ❑ Recreation /Parks ❑ Schools /Universities Septic Systems ❑ Sewer Capacity ❑ Soil Erosion/Compaction /Grading ❑ Solid Waste ❑ Toxic /Hazardous Traffic /Circulation Other: SCH # Zip Code: ❑ Joint Document ❑ Final Document ❑ Other: 0 El Appendix C ❑ Annexation ❑ Redevelopment ❑ Coastal Permit Other:Design Guideline ra Development Type: Residential: Units 16 Acres 31.86 ❑ Office: Sq.ft. Acres Employees ❑ Transportation: ❑ Commercial:Sq.ft. Acres Employees ❑ Mining: ❑ Industrial: Sq.ft. Acres Employees ❑ Power: Type ❑ Educational: ❑ Waste Treatment:Type ❑ Recreational: ❑ Hazardous Waste:Type ❑ Water Facilities:Type MGD ❑ Other: Type Mineral MW MGD Vegetation Water Quality Water Supply /Groundwater Wetland /Riparian Growth inducement Land Use Cumulative Effects Other: Note: The State Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects. if a SCH number already exists for a project (e.g. Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please Jill in. Revised 2008 Reviewing Agencies Checklist Lead Agencies may recommend State Clearinghouse distribution by marking agencies below with and "X ". If you have already sent your document to the agency please denote that with an "S ". X Air Resources Board Office of Emergency Services Boating & Waterways, Department of Office of Historic Preservation California Highway Patrol Office of Public School Construction Caltrans District # Parks & Recreation, Department of Caltrans Division of Aeronautics Pesticide Regulation, Department of Caltrans Planning Public Utilities Commission Central Valley Flood Protection Board X Regional WQCB # Coachella Valley Mtns. Conservancy Resources Agency Coastal Commission S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Comm. Colorado River Board San Gabriel & Lower L.A. Rivers & Mtns. Conservancy Conservation, Department of San Joaquin River Conservancy Corrections, Department of Santa Monica Mtns. Conservancy Delta Protection Commission State Lands Commission Education, Department of SWRCB: Clean Water Grants Energy Commission SWRCB: Water Quality X Fish & Game Region # SWRCB: Water Rights Food & Agriculture, Department of Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Forestry and Fire Protection, Department of Toxic Substances Control, Department of General Services, Department of Water Resources, Department of Health Services, Department of Housing & Community Development Other: Integrated Waste Management Board Other: Native American Heritage Commission Local Public Review Period (to be filled in by lead agency) Starting Date March 28, 2011 Lead Agency (Complete if applicable): I Date May 3, 2011 Consulting Firm: Applicant: Address: Address: City /State/Zip: City /State/Zip: Contact: Phone: Phone: Signature of Lead Agency Representative: Authority cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 21161, Public Resources Code. Date: I) \`\\ Revised 2008 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PA08 -0281 (formerly PA02- 0193): This project is a Residential Tentative Tract Map with Phasing Plan (TTM No. 30434) proposing to subdivide 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential lots, each with a minimum lot size of 1 net acres, and 1 open space lot totaling 7.06 acres to preserve an on -site riverine area /blue -line stream. Design Guidelines for future development on the site are also proposed for the project. The site is currently vacant, yet disturbed by various off -road vehicle trails. The proposed 16 Tots at a density of 0.50 dwelling units per acre (du /ac) is consistent with the density requirements of the low density residential designation of 0.5 to 2.9 du /ac. Access to the project would be provided via Pauba Road (improved), Santiago Road (to be improved with project), and an extension of Via Valencia (improved private cul -de -sac to be modified). Santiago Road is required to be improved along the project frontage and transition with the existing roadway to the west to meet City standards. A 35 foot wide section of the Santiago Road right -of -way will be paved with asphalt concrete materials along the southern project boundary. At the southwest corner of the site, the width of Santiago Road will widen from 24 feet to 35 feet over a 250 foot long transition to connect with the existing paved portion of the road. The off -site improvements involve a 348 foot long section of Santiago Road located approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of John Warner Road and Via Valencia. City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title PA08 -0281, Tentative Map No. 30434 with Phasing Plan and Design Guidelines (Paine Map) — Hidden Hills Estates Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Cheryl Kitzerow, Associate Planner P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, Ca 92089 (951) 694 -6409 Project Location This project is generally located along the south side of Pauba Road approximately 3,000 feet west of Margarita Road (across from the Temecula Public Library), and along the north side of Santiago Road, approximately 3,800 feet east of Ynez Road. Project Sponsor's Name and Address Larry Slusser The Legacy Group 43224 Omsby Road Temecula, CA 92592 General Plan Designation Low Density Residential Zoning Low Density Residential PA08 -0281 (formerly PA02- 0193): This project is a Residential Tentative Tract Map with Phasing Plan (TTM No. 30434) proposing to subdivide 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential lots, each with a minimum lot size of 1 net acres, and 1 open space lot totaling 7.06 acres to preserve an on -site riverine area /blue -line stream. Design Guidelines for future development on the site are also proposed for the project. The site is currently vacant, yet disturbed by various off - road vehicle trails. The proposed 16 lots at a density of 0.50 dwelling units per acre (du /ac) is consistent with the density requirements of the low density residential designation of 0.5 to 2.9 du /ac. Access to the project would be provided via Pauba Road (improved), Santiago Road (to be improved with project), and an extension of Via Valencia (improved private cul -de -sac to be modified). Santiago Road is required to be improved along the project frontage and transition with the existing roadway to the west to meet City standards. A 35 foot wide section of the Santiago Road right -of -way will be paved with asphalt concrete materials along the southern project boundary. At the southwest corner of the site, the width of Santiago Road will widen from 24 feet to 35 feet over a 250 foot long transition to connect with the existing paved portion of the road. The off -site improvements involve a 348 foot long section of Santiago Road located approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of John Warner Road and Via Valencia. Description of Project Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The project is located within the Low Density zoning district and Chaparral Policy Overlay Area, as identified by the City's General Plan and Development Code, which is characterized by single - family detached custom homes on large lots with a rural ranchette character of development. G: \PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 2 G:\PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\Planning\CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 3 North: Public Institutional across Pauba Road — Existing City Library South: Very Low Density Residential across Santiago Road - Existing single - family residences East: Low Density Residential - Existing single family residences West: Low Density Residential - Existing single- family residences and vacant land Other public agencies whose approval For off -site Santiago Road Improvements: is required California Department of Fish and Game US Army Corp of Engineers SD Regional Water Quality Control Board G:\PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\Planning\CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Noise Air Quality Population and Housing Biological Resources Public Services Greenhouse Gas Emissions Recreation Cultural Resources Transportation and Traffic Geology and Soils Utilities and Service Systems Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mandatory Findings of Significance None Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use and Planning Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. x find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Cheryl Kitzerow Printed Name 6 14 \ Date City of Temecula For G: \PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 4 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X X c d Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: 1.a. No Impact: There are no designated scenic vistas affected by the project. The proposed Tentative Tract Map will subdivide 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 1 net acre and 1 open space lot. This project is generally located along the south side of Pauba Road approximately 3,000 feet west of Margarita Road (across from the Temecula Public Library, and along the north side of Santiago Road, approximately 3,800 feet east of Ynez Road. The Community Design Element of the City of Temecula's General Plan identifies important scenic viewsheds to ensure that all new public and private development projects will not obstruct the public views of scenic resources. According to the General Plan exhibit on page CD -5, the subject property has not been identified as a viewshed, nor is the project located in close proximity to an identified viewshed. Therefore, no scenic vistas or identified viewsheds will be affected by the subdivision of this property, or by the future development of 16 single - family homes based on the surrounding land uses, which are consistent with this project. 1.b. No Impact: The project site is not located on a scenic highway. No rock outcroppings or historic buildings exist on the project site. One oak tree is located along the upper portion of the property along Pauba Road. This tree will be removed with the project but it is not considered protected according to the City's Heritage Tree Ordinance since it does not meet the size requirements. The site topography is characterized by a very steep -sided hill along the southeastern portion of the property, a wide valley in the center of the property, and a steep -sided hill up to the northwest portion of the site. Elevations range from 1,119.4 feet above sea level at the southwestern corner to 1,259 feet above sea level on top of the hill at the northwestern corner. A watercourse runs parallel to Santiago Road along the southern boundary. Existing single family homes are located to the east and northwest of the project site. The parcel that directly abuts the project site to the west (along Santiago) is currently vacant. As addressed above in section 1.b. and according to the General Plan, the project site contains no scenic vistas or viewsheds. There are no historical buildings that exist on site and no protected tree resources on the property, therefore no impact is anticipated. 1.c. Less than Significant: The site is vacant and has been disturbed. The project will not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site or its surroundings because the proposal to subdivide the 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 1 net acre and 1 open space lot is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation. The General Plan allows for 1 net acre lots in the Low Density Zoning District, with a density of 0.5 -2.9 dwelling units per acre. The project is consistent with the existing visual character in this area of the City. The project will not degrade the existing character of the community or the immediately surrounding areas, as the new development will be consistent with the existing single family residences in the surrounding area. A less than significant impact is anticipated. 1.d. Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not create new sources of substantial light or glare that may adversely affect the day or nighttime views within the project area. The project will include the creation of 16 residential lots, 1 open space lot, and private streets to provide access. No street lights are G: \PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 5 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X X b c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use X X d e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? X proposed as part of this subdivision. The construction of this residential subdivision will introduce new generators of light and glare typically associated with a single - family residences, however the City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Palomar Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance No. 655). Ordinance No. 655 requires that all lighting be shielded and directed downward to avoid glare on adjacent properties, and ensure low levels of glare in the sky. Lighting issues will be addressed, during the building plan check and inspection process, prior to the issuance of any budding permits for the new residence. Therefore, since the project will be required to be in compliance with Ordinance No. 655, it will not adversely affect the day or nighttime views or create substantial light or glare, resulting in a less than significant impact. Comments: 2.a., c -e. No Impact: The project site is not currently in agricultural production and will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non - agricultural use. Nor would the project result in the loss or conversion of forest land. This property is not considered Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Forest Land, pursuant the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency or the City of Temecula's General Plan. Therefore, there are no impacts related to this issue. G: \PLANNING12008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 6 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X X b c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X 2.b. No Impact: The project site does not have an agricultural zoning designation by the City of Temecula, and the site is not regulated by a Williamson Act contract. Consequently, there are no impacts related to this issue. Comments: A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with the City's General Plan EIR for City- wide Air Quality impacts, primarily from mobile sources. 3.a,b. Less then Significant Impact: The project site is located within the Temecula Planning Area which is surrounded by mountains to the west, east and south. The project site is located within the southernmost portion of the South Coast Air Quality Basin. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has jurisdiction over stationary source air quality emissions and issues within the South Coast Air Quality Basin. The proposed project will not conflict with any applicable air quality plans nor violate air quality or pollution standards. The project proposes to subdivide 31.86 gross acres site into 16 residential lots, zoned for Low Density residential development at 0.5. to 2.9 dwelling units per acre, with a minimum lot size of 1 net acre). The project site is currently vacant. Construction activities will include those associated with a new single- family development, the required street improvements and related grading activities. The project site is almost 32 acres but is divided into three construction phases. Total project earthwork for cut and fill is estimated at 172,000 cubic yards. There is a minimum of six months time lapse between phases. Based on these assumptions, the Air Quality Study prepared by Tom Dodson for the project determined that daily PM -10 emissions during site grading would be 25 pounds per day which is less than the 150 pounds per day SCAQMD significance threshold. In addition, the study further determined that daily PM 2.5 emissions during grading will be approximately 3 pounds per day, which is less than the SCAQMD significance threshold of 55 pounds per day. The report also states that the project is anticipated to generate 153 new daily trips, with an associated 1,550 vehicle miles traveled per day. The General Plan EIR assumed that development would occur on the subject site consistent with the General Plan land use designation of the Low Density residential (L). This land use designation is implemented through the City of Temecula Low Density Residential (L) zoning designation, and the project is consistent with all Development Code standards. As indicated above, the General Plan envisioned the density of the properties located within the Low Density residential zoning districts to be between 0.5 and 2.9 dwelling units per acres, with a target density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project is within the density range, and below the target, with a proposed density of 0.5 du /ac. The General Plan EIR analyzed the potential G: \PLANNING \20081PA08 -0281 TTM 304341PIanning \CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 7 impacts of development consistent with the target density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre for the Low Density residential zone. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with the General Plan EIR for the City -wide air quality impacts, and mitigation measures were adopted. This project is consistent with the General Plan's density requirements and the Development Code's residential development standards. The proposed project was anticipated as a part of the overall residential development in the City's General Plan. The implementation of the goals and policies of the General Plan, and the continued implementation of the associated mitigation measures adopted with the General Plan EIR, will result in a less than significant impact as a result of this project. 3.c, d. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard; nor will operational emissions exceed adopted significance thresholds. However, since the project includes the development of 16 additional single - family homes, it is anticipated that the proposed project will emit typical exhaust emissions and dust associated with residential construction activities, grading activities and associated half -width street improvements. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, as defined in figure AQ -2, there is one known sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, libraries, child care centers, and adult- assisted care facilities) that may be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations in the immediate vicinity. The Temecula Public Library is located immediately north of the project site across Pauba Road. In addition, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) classifies the surrounding residences as sensitive receptors. The public library and surrounding residences may be exposed to some pollutant concentrations on a short-term basis during construction and grading activities. With the implementation of the mitigation measures identified below, these impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. An Air Quality Analysis was prepared by Tom Dodson & Associates on November 3, 2008 and updated on May 17, 2010. The study concluded that construction activity air pollution emissions are not anticipated to individually exceed SCAQMD CEQA thresholds. Local Significance Thresholds (LST) for PM10 and PM2.5 could be exceeded at the closest neighbors during construction activities. Maintaining local particulate exposures below LST increments requires that Best Available Control Measures (BACMs) be used. To ensure that these impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measures will be required: Dust AirQuall: Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas. AirQual2: Prepare a high wind dust control plan and implement plan elements and terminate soil disturbance when winds exceed 25 mph. AirQual3: Stabilize previously disturbed areas if subsequent construction is delayed. AirQual4: Water exposed surfaces 3 times /day and limit on -site travel speeds to less than 15 mph. AirQual5: Cover all stockpiles with tarps if left undisturbed for more than 72 hours. AirQual6: Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as soon as feasible. AirQual7: Provide adequate water spray at truck drops and compaction surfaces during fill placement. Exhaust Emissions AirQual8: Require 90 day low NOx tune -ups for off -road equipment. G. \PLANNING \2008 \PA08 -0281 TIM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 8 AirQual9: Limit allowable idling to 5 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment. AirQua190: Utilize equipment whose engines are equipped with diesel oxidation catalysts if available. AirQuaIll: Utilize diesel particulate filters on heavy equipment where feasible. Painting and Coatings AirQual92: Use low VOC coatings and high pressure -low volume sprayers 3.e. Less than Significant Impact: Future construction associated with the development of the project will not create any considerably objectionable odors that will affect a substantial number of people in the surrounding community. In considering the scope of the project and the fact that construction activities will occur on a temporary basis, the impact is anticipated to be less than significant. G: \PLANNING \20081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 9 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X X d e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Comments: Riverside County adopted the Western Riverside County Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) on June 17, 2003. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Biological Opinion in favor of adopting the MSHCP was released on June 22, 2004. The City of Temecula is a signatory to the MSHCP, and therefore, the project is required to comply with the MSHCP. Section 6.0 of the MSHCP identifies the local implementation measures. Section 6.1.6 details the County and Cities Obligations and corresponds with Section 13.2 of the Biological Opinion issued by the USFWS. The program requires the City to undertake the following steps to insure compliance with the requirements of the MSHCP. • Payment of local development mitigation fees and other relevant fees (Section 8.5) • Comply with the Habitat Assessment program (HANS) processor equivalent process to satisfy local acquisition obligation • Comply with the survey requirements (Section 6.3.2) • Comply with the policies of the Riparian /Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools (Section 6.1.2) • Comply with the policies of the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species (Section 6.1.3) • Comply with the policies of the Urban/Wildlands Interface (Section 6.1.4) • Comply with the Best Management Practices (Section 7.0; Appendix C) G: \PLANNING120081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\Planning\CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 10 4.a -c. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: The subject site is a vacant site located within the boundaries of the City of Temecula. The property is surrounded by developed and vacant residential lots, as well as paved and unpaved infrastructure. The parcels to the east and west of the site are developed with single - family residences. The parcel located to the north of the subject site (across Pauba Road) is developed with the City's Public Library and associated parking lot. Site topography is characterized by hill and valley contours. Two prominent hilly, ridgelike landforms flank a broad valley that has been incised through the center of the site. There is an elevation change of approximately 120 feet between the ridgetops and the valley floor. These narrow ridges are parallel structures that remain between stream -cut valleys. The ridgelines and ridgetops have been disturbed by previous grading and prolonged off-road vehicle activities. The central valley contains an intermittent blueline stream as designated on the Pechanga Quadrangle. It is a tributary of Murrieta Creek. According to the General Plan, the subject property is located within a sensitive biological habitat area as identified by the City of Temecula General Plan (Sensitive Habitats Figure 5 -3). In order to determine whether or not the proposed project would have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or indirectly, through habitat modifications, or on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a Biological Survey Report was conducted by Principe and Associates dated December 2003 and updated March 2006 and April 7, 2010. This study was prepared to analyze the presence of sensitive habitat or species existing on the site. According to the Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) the subject parcel is not within an MSHCP criteria cell, however it was recommended that a Habitat Assessment for Burrowing Owl be completed. A separate MSHCP Consistency and Burrowing Owl Survey Report dated May 6, 2008 (and updated January 17, 2011) was completed by Principe and Associates. The study stated that the basic nature of the central portion of the site appears suitable for burrowing owls. It includes relatively large open expanses of sparsely vegetated areas on gentle rolling or level terrain. However, the site is located in the central portion of the City and due to increased development in the surrounding area the site does not provide suitable habitat, potential suitable habitat or even refugium for native wildlife species. The Burrowing Owl surveys concluded that critical burrowing habitat is not located on the site and burrowing owls were not observed. Furthermore, there was no evidence of either active habitat presently being used by burrowing owls, or habitat abandoned within the last three years on the site. Therefore no impacts on this species are anticipated. The Biological Survey indicated that site surface vegetation consists of Non - Native Grassland (13.4 acres) and Coastal Sage Scrub (17.2 acres). A Sandy Wash occupies approximately 0.7 acres of site area. The Survey also indicated that clay and/or saline - alkali soils were not mapped on the site. Therefore, growing habitats for clay and /or saline - alkali MSHCP - listed Narrow Endemic Plant Species and Criteria Area Species are not present onsite. The project could result in the removal of all 13.4 Non - native Grassland vegetation without imposing direct adverse or cumulative impacts on significant biological resources. Surveys conducted by Principe and Associates in 2008 and 2010 showed that the grassland is no longer providing habitat for MSHCP - listed reptile and bird species. The project could result in the removal of all 17.2 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation without imposing direct adverse or cumulative impacts on significant biological resources. Surveys conducted in 2008 and 2010 showed that the sage scrub is no longer providing habitat for MSHCP- listed bird species. Suitable required habitats for Federal and /or State - listed Endangered and Threatened Plan and Animal Species know to occur in the Temecula area are not present on the site. Also, the site is not located within the critical habitats for Endangered and Threatened Species as adopted by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Foraging and nesting trees and woodland /forest habitats for perching bird and raptor species governed by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 are not present on the site. The site is not located within an urban wildlife movement corridor for migrations, foraging movements or for finding a mate through this portion of Temecula. The project as designed, will not impact the 0.7 acres of Sandy Wash vegetation and habitat associated with the jurisdictional areas present on the site. G:\PLANNING \2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 11 A Jurisdictional Delineation was prepared by Principe and Associates for the project, dated May 2008 and updated April 7, 2010. The report concluded that the site contains one jurisdictional drainage. Corps jurisdiction totals approximately 0.54 acres of Waters of the US and CDFG jurisdiction totals approximately 0.80 acres of streambed. This ephemeral drainage enters the site through the northern portion of the eastern boundary and then trends for approximately 1,391 feet before exiting the site near the southwest corner; then flowing under Santiago Road thru three 3 -foot concrete pipes. The report concluded that the development of the 16 lots will not involve discharge of dredged or fill material, either temporarily or permanently into Corps jurisdictional Waters of the US or CDFG jurisdictional Waters of the State and therefore permit authorization from the Corps pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, California Department of Fish and Game jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code or San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board jurisdiction pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act will not be required. The project is located within Long -Term Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan and SKR Mitigation Fee Areas as designated by the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency. The applicant will be required to pay the SKR Mitigation Fee prior to issuance of grading permits. The project is also subject to payment of the MSHCP mitigation fee. The applicant will be required to pay the Local Development Mitigation fee prior to issuance of grading permits. On -site project mitigation to reduce any potential impacts include the following: Bio 1: All graded areas shall be revegetated with California native plant species that are drought tolerant, fire retardant, erosion controlling and habitat providing. While the on -site project development will not require Resource Agency permits, the off-site Santiago Road Improvements will. A Jurisdictional Delineation of Waters and Wetlands report was prepared for the TTM No. 30434 Off -site considerations by Principe and Associates, dated January 2011. As part of the TTM 30434 development, Santiago Road is required to be improved along the project frontage and transition with the existing roadway to the west to meet City standards. A 35 foot wide section of the Santiago Road right -of -way will be paved with asphalt concrete materials along the southern project boundary. At the southwest corner of the site, the width of Santiago Road will widen from 24 feet to 35 feet over a 250 foot long transition to connect with the existing paved portion of the road. The off -site improvements involve a 348 foot long section of Santiago Road located approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of John Warner Road and Via Valencia. To accomplish the road improvement project, the channel and banks of the blueline stream that roughly parallels the project site will be realigned between 2 and 20 feet to the south. The construction of the new channel and banks will occur within the section of Santiago Road right -of -way that will not be paved with this project. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that one reach of an intermittent blueline stream designated on the USGS Pechanga and Temecula Quadrangles is present within the boundaries of the road improvement project site. The stream is ephemeral in nature, and an unnamed tributary to Murrieta Creek. Corps jurisdiction within the road project site totals 0.076 acres of Waters of the US. CDFG jurisdiction also totals 0.076 acres of Waters of the State. There is no riparian vegetation and no hydrophytic vegetation or hydric soils. The channel is unvegetated but the banks are vegetated with typical upland Grassland species. The road alignment was overlaid onto the jurisdictional areas to determine the extent of impacts of 0.053 acres of Corps and CDFG jurisdictional waters. As the project will result in impacts to jurisdictional areas, the prior authorizations from the Corps, CDFG, and San Diego Water Board will be required. In addition, the following mitigation measures must be implemented to reduce impacts to a less than significant level: Bio2: Resource Agency permits shall be obtained and copies provided to the City prior to the issuance of grading permits for the Santiago Roadway Improvements or construction of Phase 2 or 3 of the project, whichever occurs first. G: \PLANNING\20081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\Planning\CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 12 Bio3: A minimum of 0.26 acres ( +1-5:1 ratio) of revegetation /habitat creation within the channel and /or banks shall be achieved. 4.d. No Impact: The proposed project is not anticipated to substantially interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites, as discussed in Section 4a -c above. The Biological Survey Report analyzed the subject property and has determined that the development of the site as proposed will remove no quality habitat, as the quality of the biological resource habitat on the site is low. Additionally, the project site is surrounded by urban /suburban development and as an infill parcel, will have no potential to adversely impact wildlife movement. No impacts are anticipated and no mitigation will be required. 4.e. Less than Significant Impact: The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. The project will be conditioned to comply with provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation), which requires payment of the Stephens Kangaroo Rat fee prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Additionally, Trees subject to the City's Heritage Tree Ordinance are not present on the site. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 4.f. Less than Significant Impact: According to the Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) the subject parcel is not within an MSHCP criteria cell, however it was recommended that a Habitat Assessment for Burrowing Owl be completed. A separate MSHCP Consistency and Burrowing Owl Survey Report dated May 6, 2008 (and updated January 17, 2011) was completed by Principe and Associates. The study stated that the basic nature of the central portion of the site appears suitable for burrowing owls. It includes relatively large open expanses of sparsely vegetated areas on gentle rolling or level terrain. However, the site is located in the central portion of the City and due to increased development in the surrounding area the site does not provide suitable habitat, potential suitable habitat or even refugium for native wildlife species. The Burrowing Own surveys concluded that critical burrowing habitat is not located on the site and burrowing owls were not observed. Furthermore, there was no evidence of either active habitat presently being used by burrowing owls, or habitat abandoned within the last three years on the site. Therefore no impacts on this species are anticipated. The subject parcel is not within an MSHCP criteria cell. The MSHCP Consistency Report prepared for the project indicates that the project site is not located in close proximity to MSHCP Conservation Areas. The most proximate conservation areas are located along Temecula Creek to the south and Murrieta Creek to the west. As part of the MSHCP consistency analysis, the report reviewed the projects' impacts to species associated with riparian /riverine areas and vernal pools, narrow endemic plant species, urban /wildlands interface and additional survey requirements per MSHCP Sections 6.1.2, 6.1.3, 6.1.4, and 6.3.2. The report concluded the following: Section 6.1.2: Riparian /Riverine — Based on species composition, the vegetation growing along the blueline stream does not meet the MSHCP definition of a Riparian Area. It does however meet the definition of a Riverine Area and the protection of associated amphibian, bird, fish, invertebrate- crustacean, and plant species is required. The project as designed conserves this area within a permanent open space lot. No other kinds of aquatic feature are present on the site. A less than significant impact is anticipated. Section 6.1.3: Narrow Endemic Plant Species — The site is not located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area. Section 6.1.4: Urban/Wildlands Interface — The site is not located in dose proximity to a MSHCP Conservation Area and is therefore not subject to Guidelines Pertaining to the Urban/Wlldlands Interface. Section 6.3.2: Addition Surveys — The site is not located in an area where additional survey are needed for certain species in conjunction with MSHCP implementation. The Burrowing Owl survey results are discussed above. G :\PLANNING \2008\PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 13 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? X c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Based on the conclusions within the MSHCP Consistency and Burrowing Owl Survey Report dated May 6, 2008 (and updated January 17, 2011) prepared by Principe and Associates, a Tess than significant impact is anticipated. Comments: 5.a -d. No Impact: The City of Temecula General Plan does not identify the subject parcel as a sensitive archeological resource area; however the subject parcel is identified as being in a highly sensitive paleontological area. The University of California, Riverside's Eastern Information Center (EIC) reviewed the proposal for the Tentative Tract Map (TPM No. 30343) to subdivide 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential Tots, each with a minimum lot size of 1 net acre, and recommended that a Phase 1 cultural study be completed due to the site potentially containing sensitive cultural resources. Jean A Keller, Ph.D. conducted a Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment, dated February 2006 to identify, evaluate, and recommend mitigation measures for existing cultural resources that may be adversely impacted by the proposed development. The Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment commenced with a review of maps, site records, and reports at the California Archaeological Inventory and California Historical Resources Information System /Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside. A literature search of available publications and archival materials pertaining to the subject property followed the records search. Finally, a comprehensive on- foot field survey of the subject property was conducted for the purpose of locating, documenting, and evaluating all existing cultural resources within its boundaries. The Report concluded that the subject property had not been included in any previous cultural resources studies and that no archaeological sites had been recorded within its boundaries. Furthermore, cultural resources of either prehistoric or historic origin were not observed within the project boundaries during the field survey. Therefore, neither further research nor mitigation was recommended. Standard conditions of approval requiring grading to be halted or diverted should any subsurface cultural resources be encountered will be applied to the project. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project, and no mitigation is required. G:\PLANNING \20081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 14 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of Toss, injury, or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Strong seismic ground shaking? X X X i. ii iii Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the Toss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Comments: 6.a.i -ii: Less than Significant Impact: The City of Temecula General Plan does not identify any known faults through the project site. A Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation was prepared by The Soils Company Incorporated in April 2002, and updated in March 2009 and April 2010. The report concludes that the project site is not located within a State of California Alquist Priolo Fault Rupture Hazard Fault Zone. The closest known active fault is the Elsinore Fault Zone (Temecula Segment) located about 2.2 kilometers to the southwest. Additionally, all of Southern California is within a highly active seismic region, and Riverside County is traversed by a number of active and potentially active faults and has historically experienced earth quakes of moderate magnitudes. Historically, significant earthquakes causing strong ground shaking have occurred on local and regional faults near the site. No geomorphic expressions suggestive of faulting, such as linear topography, offset streams, spring lines and /or fault scarps were noted within the subject site during site investigation and aerial photograph review of the site. In addition, the Geotechnical Study states that moderate to severe seismic shaking of the site can be expected during the lifetime of the project. Therefore, structures should be designed accordingly. Since Southern California, in general, is considered susceptible to large earthquakes, and the project site is in close proximity to certain known major fault systems, development of the project site in conformance with City codes and ordinances, and the most recent Uniform Building Code, will result in less than significant impacts. 6.a.iii. Less than Significant Impact: Soil liquefaction is caused by the loss of soil strength, which is a result of increased pore water pressures related to significant seismic activity. This phenomenon occurs primarily in loose to somewhat dense cohesionless soils, which are located within a groundwater zone. When seismic shaking occurs a rearrangement of the soil particles take place, putting them into a denser condition, which results in the localized settlement, sand boils and /or flow failures. The Geotechnical Study prepared for the G: \PLANNING \20081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 15 project identifies the soils underlying the subject site as Type Sd, 'stiff soil profile', according to the 2007 CBC. The study concluded that due to the dense /stiff nature of the underlying sedimentary bedrock units and the absence of regional shallow groundwater, liquefaction and other shallow groundwater related hazards are not anticipated, and further analysis is unwarranted at this time. Based on the above, the liquefaction potential is anticipated to be low and therefore a less than significant impact is anticipated. 6.iv. Less than Significant Impact: Landslides are a geological process which can be induced by seismic activity. The process involves the downslope movement of geologic materials. The stability of slopes is related to a variety of factors including the slope's steepness, the strength of the geologic materials in terms of resistance to the downslope stress of gravity, the characteristics of the bedding planes, joints and faults, surface water and groundwater conditions, along with other factors. The City of Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or mudslides located on the site or in the vicinity of the site. The Geotechnical Study prepared for the project concluded that no geomorphic expression of landsliding or slope instability was noted during the aerial photograph examination or site mapping and the potential for landsliding during a seismic event is considered very low under current conditions. Therefore, a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 6.b. Less than Significant Impact: The site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The proposed project has the potential to result in soils erosion due to construction activities once the final map is recorded and the site is developed with 16 single family homes. The Geotechnical Study recommends that the loose nature of the existing undocumented fill on -site and alluvial soils will require complete removal of undocumented fill and the alluvial soils within the drainage swales in the proposed fill areas until medium dense to dense unweathered sedimentary bedrock is exposed that is free of pin -point pores and fine roots. All colluvial soils will also be removed during rough grade operations. The project will be required to comply with all recommendations contained within the Soils Report. Additionally the project will be developed according to all applicable City of Temecula standards, including National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards, which require the implementation of erosion control and best management practices (BMP's) to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. Therefore, a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 6.c. Less than Significant Impact: The project would not be located in a geologic unit or on soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. The project is within a Liquefaction Area with very low liquefaction potential, as indicated on the City's Geographic Information System map. The Geotechnical Study prepared for the project identifies the soils underlying the subject site as Type Sd, 'stiff soil profile', according to the 2007 CBC. Since the project will be conditioned to comply with the Soils report, a Tess than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 6.d. Less than Significant Impact: The project is not located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1- B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property. The Geotechnical Study prepared for the project indicates that the expansion index for the onsite soils varied from 0 to 6, or Nonexpansive. In addition, the project is also required to comply with the Preliminary Soils Investigation prepared for the project, and a final Soil Report will be required to be submitted and approved prior to the initial grading plan check. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 6.e. Less than Significant Impact: An Onsite Sewage Disposal Feasibility Investigation was prepared by The Soils Company, Incorporated in April 2008 and updated April 2010. The Study concluded utilizing the septic tank/seepage pit method of disposal is feasible for the proposed 16 lots provided the design recommendations provided in the report are implemented during site development. The report further concluded that based on the size of the individual lots and the proposed development design, there is sufficient area to allow installation of an adequate onsite septic tank /seepage pit disposal system. The soils are capable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. A SAN 53 (Sewer and Water availability) letter was submitted from the Riverside County Health Department and has confirmed that the soils can adequately support the G: \PLANNING\2008\PA08 -0281 TfM 30434 \Planning\CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 16 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? x b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? x septic tanks. Final approval of all septic systems will be required to be obtained from the Department of Environmental Health. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. Comments: 7.a,b. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: There are currently no adopted GHG significance thresholds for project CEQA clearance. The California Governor's Office of Planning and Research has amended the Sate CEQA Guidelines to incorporate GHG. These amendments were adopted on December 30, 2009. They contain requirements to characterize the GHG setting, quantify the impacts resulting from the proposed project, determine impact significance, and mitigate as appropriate. They leave the determination of significance to the Lead Agency. On December 5, 2008, SCAQMD Governing Board adopted an Interim quantitative GHG Significance Threshold for industrial projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency, and as part of this process, the SCAQMD established a working group of stakeholders that also considered thresholds for commercial or residential projects. As of this date, no final action on a quantitative significance threshold has been taken, but 3,000 metric tons per year has become a de facto screening threshold for GHG on residential projects. Implementation of the proposed project would contribute to long -term increases in GHGs as a result of traffic increases (mobile sources) and minor secondary fuel combustion emissions from space heating, etc. Development occurring as a result of the proposed project would also result in secondary operational increases in GHG emissions as a result of electricity generation to meet project- related increases in energy demand. Short-term GHG emissions will also derive from construction activities. An Air Quality Study for the project was prepared by Tom Dodson. The Urbemis Model prepared by Tom Dodson determined that during project construction, grading activity will generate 124 metric tons of CO2 emissions and construction /paint/and paving will generate 100 metric tons of CO2, during each construction phase, for a total of 224 metric tons of CO2 for the worst case year of construction if the project is developed in a single year. This total is less than the 3,000 metric ton threshold. The study further determined that project operational GHG emissions will be below this threshold as well. However, for the proposed project, the transportation component will comprise approximately 75 percent of the project - related GHG emissions. Reductions in the vehicular contribution are therefore critical in achieving the goals of statewide /national GHG minimization programs — which requires focus on energy conservation. In order to reduce the global cumulative impact from project implementation to a less than significant impact, the following mitigation measures shall be required: GHG 1: New residential building shall be constructed to meet California Title 24 energy efficiency requirements GHG 2: New appliances and equipment for the residential buildings shall meet Energy Star Certification GHG 3: Landscape maintenance shall implement green waste and recycling G:IPLANNING120081PA08 -0281 TIM 304341PIanning\CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 17 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Expose people or structures to a significant risk or Toss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X _ X X X f g h GHG 4: Landscaping shall include low water requirements and fast growth. GHG 5: Trees and vegetation shall be planted to shade buildings and thus reduce heating /cooling demand and to sequester carbon Comments: 8.a -h. No Impact: The project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials because the project will not require a significant amount of export fill, and the site is not known to contain any hazardous soils or other hazardous materials onsite. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset or accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment because the project is a 16 -lot residential subdivision and will not include any hazardous materials beyond those reasonably anticipated for single - family residences. The project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous - materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school because the project will not emit hazardous G : \PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 18 emissions beyond those anticipated for a residential project. The project is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport. The project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. The project would not impair the implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk or Toss, injury or death involving wild and fires, including where wild lands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wild lands because the project is located in an residential infill area, and the project site has been conditioned for approval to include adequate access for public safety vehicles, including fire apparatus. G:IPLANNING120081PA08 -0281 TT■ 30434\Planning\CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 19 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X X b c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? X d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? X e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f Require the pre•aration of a •ro'ect- s•ecific WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of Toss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 9.a. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The project is a 16 lot residential subdivision with associated improvements and is required to comply with the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) requirements contained in the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit issued by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. The applicant has also submitted a SAN 53 (sewer and water availability) which has indicated that the Rancho California Water District has agreed to provide domestic water. This document also indicated that domestic sewage disposal will be provided by on -site septic tanks, since sewer connection is not available to serve the subject site or the adjacent parcels within the immediate vicinity. A soils feasibility study was submitted to determine that the location of the proposed septic tank on the subject parcel is feasible. The project also requires that appropriate permits or clearances be obtained from G: \PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 20 the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (Corps) and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, pursuant to Sections 404 and 401, respectively, of the Federal Clean Water Act, and from the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), pursuant to Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code and the federal and state Endangered Species Act. The project has been conditioned accordingly, and mitigation measures (as addressed in Section 4.b -c) will be implemented to require that copies of all required permits or clearances shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any City permits. The project is also required to comply with all of the terms and conditions of the required permits and agreements. A Tess than significant impact is anticipated. 9.b. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with the site's existing ability to provide groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) because the project is a low density residential project with adequate open space, proposed landscape areas, and permanent post - construction infiltration devices that will allow infiltration to assist with ground water re- charging. A less than significant impact is anticipated. 9.c -e. Less than Significant Impact: A Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer will be required to be submitted to identify storm water run -off expected as a result of this project. The Drainage Study shall include a watershed analysis to determine the 100 -year floodplain water surface elevation, determine the 100 -year floodway, and floodplain limits, and include the design of the unnamed creek along Santiago Road from the easterly property boundary to the westerly property boundary. Thus, establishing the centerline profile elevation for Santiago Road. During construction activities, erosion and siltation issues will be controlled to a less than significant level of impact by implementing construction -phase best management practices (BMP's). Following the completion of construction activities, the project will implement permanent post- construction infiltration BMPs to control increases in the rate, volume, and pollutant -load from additional surface runoff. In addition, the adequacy of the capacity of existing on- and -off site, drainage facilities shall be verified and any upgrading or upsizing of those facilities, as required, will be incorporated as part of the project to prevent flooding. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 9.f. Less than Significant Impact: The project is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) pursuant to the City's NPDES MS4 permit. The WQMP was conceptually accepted by the Public Works Department on 11/18/2010. The water quality control measures identified in the WQMP have been incorporated into the design of the project and are expected to eliminate potential adverse impacts to receiving waters. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 9.g -h. No Impact: In adhering to the City's General Plan, the project will not involve the placement of residences or structures in a 100 year floodplain hazard area. The project is not within an area identified on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps for flooding. No significant flood hazards are expected to occur from developing the project site as proposed, therefore no impact is anticipated. 9.i. No Impact: The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. The subject property is not located within a dam inundation area per the City's General Plan. The proposed project does not contain critical or essential facilities, therefore no impact is anticipated. 9.j. No Impact Due to the project area's distance from the ocean and elevation, there is no potential for a tsunami. The project area is not located near a large surface water body and there is no potential for inundation by seiche or mudflow. No impacts are anticipated. G: \PLANNING \2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 21 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X a Physically divide an established community? b Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Comments: 10.a. No Impact: The project and associated street improvements will not divide the existing residential community, but will further implement the Roadway Plan that is addressed in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The General Plan has indicated that Santiago Road, at its ultimate right -of -way, is planned to be a limited secondary arterial road consisting of 2 divided lanes. The street improvements that are required for this Tentative Tract Map will be constructed to meet all of the Department of Public Works standards and will be consistent with the Roadway Plan and the Circulation Element in the General Plan. The lot layout and design will not divide the existing residential community. No impact is anticipated. 10.b. No Impact: The project will not conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The project is consistent with the "L" Low Density Residential General Plan Designation, Development Standards in the City's Development Code, and Chaparral Policies in the General Plan; therefore no adverse impact is anticipated. 10.c. Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project is not within a Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) criteria area, however it was determined that the site may have the potential for containing habitat for Burrowing Owl. A Biological Survey Report, Burrowing Owl Survey and a Western Riverside County Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Consistency Analysis were prepared for the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 30434, by Principe and Associates, dated March 2006, May 6, 2008, April 2010, and January 2011, respectively. These studies indicated that the project site does not contain quality biological resources or habitat to support biologically sensitive species. A Burrowing Owl Survey was conducted, and the results of this survey confirmed that the site is not occupied by the burrowing owl and does not provide critical habitat for this species (January 17, 2011). The project will be required to pay Kangaroo Rat fees since the project is within the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat (SKR) fee area, and will also be conditioned to pay an MSHCP fees. G:\PLANNING120081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\Planning\CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 22 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the Toss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Comments: 11.a. No Impact: This project is not anticipated to result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or to the residences of the State. According to the General Plan, the State Division of Mines and Geology has prepared a mineral resources report entitled, Mineral Land Classification of the Temescal Valley Area, Riverside County, California, Special Report 165, which evaluated mineral deposits within the Temecula Planning Area. According to the State Geologist, the Temecula Planning Area was classified as a Mineral Resources Zone -3a (MRZ -3a), which determined that the area contains sedimentary deposits which have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate, however these areas are not considered to contain mineral resources of significant economic value. No impact is anticipated. 11.b. No Impact: This project is not anticipated to result on the Toss of locally important mineral resources, as the project site which is within the Temecula Planning area, which has been classified as a Mineral Resources Zone -3a (MRZ -3a), and according to the General Plan is not considered to contain mineral resources of significant economic value. G:\PLANNING\2008 \PA08- 0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 23 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X X d e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Comments: 12.a,b. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project may expose persons to, or cause the generation of noise levels to exceed the standards established in the General Plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies, as the project consists of an 16 -lot residential subdivision along Circulation Element Roadways. The proposed project includes the subdivision of 31.86 acres into 16 single family detached homes. Three homes are located off Pauba Road, and 13 homes are located off Santiago Road. Unit design and placement is not proposed at this time. In order to determine potential noise impacts to future residences, the following mitigation measure shall be incorporated: Noisel: Project specific noise impact analysis shall be submitted with an application for Residential Product Review (Development Plan) for merchant built tract or upon submittal of building permits for custom homes on Lots 1 -3 and /or Lots 12 -16. 12.c. Less than Significant Impact: The project will create a small permanent increase above the currently existing ambient noise levels within the project vicinity. The project is a 16 -lot residential project, which will increase noise levels above that of the existing parcel, however the impact is anticipated to be less than significant as the project is consistent with the General Plan and zoning for the site. The project site, as well as the surrounding area is zoned Low Density residential, and the development of 16 residences on the project site is not anticipated to cause a significant negative impact on existing ambient noise levels. 12.d. Less than Significant Impact: A temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above existing levels will occur during grading and construction activities associated with the new development, however the impact will be temporary and should not constitute a significant negative impact. A less than significant impact is anticipated. G:\PLANNING\2008\PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\PIanning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 24 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housin• elsewhere? X 12.e,f. No Impact: The project is not located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has been adopted, nor is the project within two miles of a private or public airport or airstrip. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Comments: 13.a. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly. The project consists of the subdivision of 31.86 acres into 16 residential Tots and 1 open space lot on a currently vacant site. The associated street improvements will be constructed as consistent with the General Plan Circulation Element and Roadway Plan, and an indirect impact on population growth is not anticipated as a result of this project. The long -term implementation of the General Plan has anticipated for up to 25,005 new net housing units over the next 20 years. Since this project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code, its potential impacts as it relates to an increase in the population have been previously considered and analyzed. A less than significant impact on population growth as a result of this project is anticipated. 13.b,c. No Impact: The project does not involve the displacement of any existing housing, nor does the project consist of the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. G:\PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 25 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: X X Fire protection? Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Comments: 14.a. Less than Significant Impact: The project for a 16 -lot subdivision will not require new or altered government facilities or services. The General Plan EIR has analyzed the need for public services and facilities in light of the needs of the City at maximum build -out, which considered the zoning, land use and density of the project site at maximum capacity (1 acre minimum with 0.5- 2.9 dwelling units per acre). The long -term implementation of the General Plan will create a capacity for up to 25,005 new net housing units over the next 20 years. Since the project is consistent with the zoning and General Plan requirements, a less than significant impact on public services or facilities is expected. Fire Protection The Riverside County Fire Department provides fire protection and safety services to the City. The nearest fire station is No. 84, at 30650 Pauba Road in Temecula. The proposed project will result in incremental impacts to existing fire protection resources. Payment of the City's Development Impact Fees ensures that any potential impact will be reduced to an insignificant level. No additional mitigation measures are required. Police Protection Law enforcement services are provided to the City through a contractual agreement with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The nearest police station is located at 30722 — A Auld Road, in the French Valley. The proposed project will result in incremental impacts to existing police protection services. Payment of the City's Development Impact Fees ensures that any potential impact will be reduced to an insignificant level. No additional mitigation measures are required. Schools The project site is located within the jurisdiction of the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) The site does not currently have any residences and does not place any demand on the existing school District. The proposed project will put an additional demand on school facilities. For a 2 -year building schedule to reach buildout of the proposed project, the project is expected to generate students at a rate commensurate to that of the TVUSD which are: 0.3754 elementary students, 0.1718 middle school students, and 0.2011 high school students. For the 16 dwelling units, this would result in 6 new elementary school students, 2.75 junior G: \PLANNING \2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 26 high school students, and 3.22 high school students at buildout. The student generation total for the proposed project is forecast to be 12 new students. The District requires payment of impact fees per dwelling unit. The development impact fee mitigation program of the TVUSD adequately provides for mitigating the impacts of the proposed project in accordance with current state law. No other mitigation is identified or needed. Since this is a mandatory requirement, no additional mitigation measures are required to reduce school impacts to a less than significant level of impact. Parks The proposed project will increase population and associated burden on parks in the area. The proposed project will contribute to cumulative demand for public services within the City of Temecula. The City of Temecula's Quimby Requirements and Development Impact Fees (DIF) are designed to offset the potential impacts to fire, police, park and recreation and public facility maintenance, including roads. The proposed project's payment of these fees can reduce the potential service demand impacts related to the 16 units to a less than significant level. Since the Quimby Requirements and DIF are mandatory for development within the City, no additional mitigation is required for the public service issues. Impacts are incremental, but are considered less than significant. Other public facilities The proposed project will incrementally increase population and associated burden on other governmental services, including the library. To offset any impacts, the development will be required to pay the DIF which contains components to offset impacts to other governmental facilities. Since the DIF is mandatory for development within the City, no additional mitigation is required for the public service issues. Impacts are incremental, but are considered less than significant. G:\PLANNING \2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 27 15. RECREATION. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 15.a. Less then Significant Impact: The City owns and maintains 39 parks. The City also has two recreation centers, an outdoor amphitheater, a gymnasium, two swimming pools (including a joint use agreement with TVUSD for the Chaparral HS pool during the summer), a senior center, the Temecula History Museum and Children's Museum, and Public Library. According to the City of Temecula General Plan Update EIR (section 5.12 -13), the City has set a standard of five acres of City -owned parkland per 1,000 residents, and based upon the City's population of 72,715 residents at the time that the General Plan was updated, the City should offer 364 acres of parkland. Currently there are 309 acres of parkland existing within the City (plus an additional 37.75 school acres via a joint use agreement with TVUSD). The project may slightly increase the use of existing parks or other recreational facilities in the area. However, the Temecula Community Services Department has reviewed this project to ensure that the goals and policies of the Open Space /Conservation Element of the General Plan are being implemented. The General Plan implementation program for the Open Space /Conservation Element requires the dedication of parkland or the payment of in- lieu fees to be used to fund additional park and recreation facilities in order to reach the General Plan's 364 acre threshold. The Community Services Department has required the payment of Quimby fees pursuant to the Temecula Subdivision Ordinance Section 16.33. The impact of this project on park and recreation facilities is anticipated to be less than significant. 15.b. No Impact: The project will not include or require the construction or expansion of additional recreational facilities. The scope of the project includes the subdivision of 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 1 net acre. No new construction of recreational facilities and no expansion of existing recreational facilities are proposed as a part of this project, therefore no impacts are anticipated. G:\PtANNING \20081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 28 16. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact a Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? b Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Result in inadequate emergency access? Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X X X e f Comments: 16.a. Less than Significant Impact: The project will create a Tess than significant increase in traffic volume in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. The project site is comprised of 31.86 acres that is proposed to be subdivided into 16 single family residential lots with 3 lots accessed from a private street off Pauba Road (existing) and 13 lots accessed from private streets off Santiago Road. The proposed project also includes the required street improvements, to be consistent with all applicable Department of Public Works standards and requirements, which will require 10 feet of parkway and 35 feet of asphalt vehicular travel lanes on Santiago Road. The Roadway Plan contained in the General Plan classifies Santiago Road as a limited secondary arterial which will be constructed to its maximum right -of -way width of two divided lanes at 88'. The complete construction of Santiago Road is anticipated to be complete once the City reaches "build -out" in the year 2025. The General Plan EIR assumed that Development would occur on the project site consistent with the Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential (L), which is implemented by the City's zoning designation of Low Density Residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation and meets all applicable zoning standards for projects in the Low Density zoning district. The General Plan EIR analyzed the potential traffic impacts of projects in the Low Density Residential Land Use Designation, has indicated that the long range implementation of the General Plan will create a capacity for up to 25,005 net new housing units. The impacts of this project have been analyzed as a part of the long -range implementation of the General Plan, and the continued implementation of the mitigation measures adopted as part of the General Plan EIR Update will ensure that the traffic impacts associated with this 16 -lot subdivision are less than significant. G:\PLANNING120081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\Planning \CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 29 16.b. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not exceed, either individually or cumulatively, the level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, as the project includes an 16 -lot subdivision that is consistent with the zoning and density standards for the project site. Current level of service standards are anticipated to be maintained as consistent with the General Plan. A Tess than significant impact is anticipated. 16.c. Less then Significant Impact The project site and associated roadways will be improved pursuant to Public Works standards and requirements. No significant change in air traffic patterns, traffic levels or locations that result in a substantial safety risk is anticipated as a result of this project; therefore a less than significant impact is anticipated. 16.d. Less than Significant Impact: The project as stated above will not involve a substantial increase in hazards due to design or incompatible uses. Three new private streets, and Santiago Road improvements will be constructed as a part of this project. These street improvements will meet all applicable standards as required by the Department of Public Works. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 16.e. Less than Significant Impact: This project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Fire Prevention Bureau to ensure that all access to the site meets all applicable standards and requirements. Safe and adequate emergency access will be ensured, as all streets and driveways will be required to be improved to meet all applicable all City standards for width, grade and length. A less than significant impact is associated as a result of this project. 16.f. No Impact: The proposed project is a 16 -lot residential subdivision. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project will be reviewed to ensure that sufficient parking is being provided consistent with the development code's requirements for single family residences. Therefore, the proposed project will not result in inadequate parking facilities. The project includes 4 -foot decomposed granite trails along the private streets as well as a 6 -foot alternative trail within the right -of -way along Pauba Road. The project does not conflict with any adopted plans, policies or programs in regards to alternative transportation. No impact is anticipated. G: \PLANNING \2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 30 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X X b c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 17.a,b,e. Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not exceed applicable wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project will likely create urban pollutants typical of any development, including oils and other substances. However, water quality standards and discharge requirements will not be violated if the following is satisfied: Given that the project site exceeds five acres, the project is required to acquire a Notice of Intent from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board, in accordance with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The NPDES permit is required for any discharge of wastes to surface waters, resulting from dewatering during construction, stormwater runoff from construction, and construction sites. The permit includes a list of Best Management Practices which outlines measures to be undertaken by the applicant to guard against accidental contamination of ground waters and surface waters. The project will meet all Regional Water Quality Control Board standards. The project will have wastewater volumes typical of a residential subdivision, however the impacts are anticipated to be less than significant due to the fact that the project proposes only a 16 -lot subdivision consistent with the General Plan and Zoning. The Riverside County Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the site plan for this project and indicated that the additional single - family homes that will be built as a result of the project will be served by septic systems until such time that a public sewer system is made available to this project and the surrounding area. Rancho California Water District (RCWD) has indicated that water service would be available contingent upon an agreement between the property owner and RCWD. A less than significant impact is anticipated. 17.c. Less than Significant Impact: The project incorporates 2 on -site detention facilities for water run -off. It is not anticipated that the project will not create a significant amount of storm water to require or result in the expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. A G: \PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 31 Preliminary Hydrology and Hydraulics Study was prepared by JLC Engineering for the project. The study concluded that the storm drain facilities provide flood protection for the project site and the basin volumes provide adequate volume to handle project runoff. The project has been conditioned to require that a detailed Final Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City standards identifying storm water run -off that is expected from the project site, and upstream from the project site. Additionally to project has been conditioned to require that the adequacy of the capacity of downstream facilities shall be verified, and any upgrading or upsizing of such facilities shall be provided if necessary. Considering the limited scope of the project, and the required Conditions of Approval, the project is anticipated to have a Tess then significant impact. 17.d. No Impact The project will not have a significant impact on the water supply for the area. The Rancho California Water District has provided a letter indicating that sufficient water supply would be available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources provided the appropriate agreements are completed. No new or expanded facilities are anticipated to be constructed as a result of the proposed project. 17.f. No Impact The proposed project will generate demand for solid waste service system capacity. Solid waste disposal capacity has been increased under the County to provide adequate disposal capacity for cumulative demand over the planning horizon (minimum of five years). The project area's solid waste is collected and disposed of at the El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill located at 10910 Dawson Canyon Road east of Interstate 15 in the Gavilan Hills. According to the State of California's Solid Waste Information System, the landfill is active and permitted with a projected closure date of January 1, 2030. The proposed project is not expected to generate solid wastes other than typical municipal solid waste generated by residential uses. Estimated generation rate is 1.57 tons of solid waste per year per household, or an estimated 25.12 tons per year from this project. Combined with the City's mandatory source reduction and recycling program, the proposed project is not forecast to cause any adverse impact to either the solid waste collection or landfill disposal system. The proposed project is not anticipated to create a significant amount of solid wastes. The project will be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs. 17.g. No Impact: The project will comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The project does not propose activities that will significantly impact solid waste services or facilities. The project must comply with construction and debris removal and recycling requirements and shall contract with the City's waste hauler /franchisee for all bins and their removal in accordance with City Ordinance. No impacts are anticipated for the proposed project. G:\PLANNING12008 \PA08- 0281 TTM 30434 \Planning\CEQA docs\CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 32 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: 18.a. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: The proposal for this 16 -lot residential subdivision and off -site improvements to Santiago Road, will have a less than significant impact for the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory as long as the Mitigation Measures identified in Section 4a -c above are implemented. 18.b. Less than Significant Impact: The project does not have, either individually or cumulatively, a significant adverse impact on the environment. The project has been designed to avoid any significant impacts to the area individually and cumulatively, and has been conditioned to avoid these impacts. Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to ensure that any potentially significant impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 18.c. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not have significant environmental impacts that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, because the project site is zoned for residential uses and is consistent with the density for the project site. All buildings and structures that will be built on site shall be required to be in compliance with the Califomia Uniform Building Code, and Conditions of Approval have been incorporated and the project has been designed to protect the public health, safety and welfare and to avoid any impacts to other persons directly and /or indirectly. Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to ensure that any potentially significant impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project G: \PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 33 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. Comments: 19.a. The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System Map Sets were used as a referenced source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street in Temecula. The Geographic Information Systems Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.orq. 19.b. The affects of the proposed project were adequately analyzed when the City of Temecula's General Plan and General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report were adopted and mitigation measures were incorporated. There were earlier impacts, which affected this project, however it is difficult to assess whether they were adequately addressed as mitigation measures. 19.c. No Mitigation Measures from earlier analyses have been relied upon for this project. Project specific mitigation measures, as identified in this document will be incorporated as conditions of approval to ensure that any potentially significant impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. All mitigation measure will be required per the project's Conditions of Approval and /or incorporated into the project. The Mitigation Monitoring Program is attached hereto to ensure that mitigation is implemented, monitored and enforced by all necessary departments and agencies. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan, April 12, 2005. 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, April 12, 2005. 3. City of Temecula GIS: www.cityoftemecula.orq 4. South Coast Air Quality District Website: www.AQMD.gov 5. Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan for TTM 30434, prepared by JLC Engineering and Consulting, Inc., dated December 5, 2008 6. General Biological Assessment for TTM 30434, prepared by Principe and Associates, dated December 2003; updated March 2006 7. MSHCP Compliance Report and Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment for TTM 30434, prepared by Principe and Associates, dated May 6, 2008 8. Letter Update of MSHCP Compliance Report and Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment, General Biological Assessment, and Jurisdictional Delineation of Waters and Wetlands, prepared by Principe and Associates, dated April 7, 2010 9. Burrowing Owl Update, prepared by Principe and Associates, dated January 17, 2011 10. Jurisdictional Delineation of Waters and Wetlands for TTM 30434, prepared by Principe and Associates, dated May 2008 G: \PLANNING \2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 34 11. Jurisdictional Delineation of Waters and Wetlands TTM 30434 Off -Site Santiago Road Improvements, prepared by Principe and Associates, dated January 2011 12. On -site sewage disposal feasibility investigation, prepared by The Soils Company, Inc., dated April 23, 2008 13. Update to On -site sewage disposal feasibility investigation, prepared by The Soils Company, Inc., dated April 6, 2010 14. Air Quality Analysis for the Paine Subdivision, prepared by Tom Dodson & Associates, dated November 3, 2008 and May 17, 2010 15. Preliminary Drainage Study for TTM 30434, prepared by Markham Development Management Group, Inc., dated March 23, 2006 16. Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment of TTM 30434, prepared by Jean A Keller, Ph.D., dated February 2006 17. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for TTM 30434, prepared by THE Soils Company, Inc., dated April 30, 2002 18. Update to Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for TTM 30434, prepared by THE Soils Company, Inc., dated March 27, 2009 and April 6, 2010 19. Preliminary Hydrology and Hydraulics Study for TTM 30434, prepared by JLC Engineering and Consulting Inc., dated December 5, 2008 G: \PLANNING \20081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA docs \CEQA Initial Study Rev 2010.doc 35 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08 -0281, TTM No. 30434, PAINE MAP /HIDDEN HILLS MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure General Impact AIR QUALITY The project has the potential to create an adverse air quality impact only during short-term construction activity. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM AirQuail: Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas. AirQual2: Prepare a high wind dust control plan and implement plan elements and terminate soil disturbance when winds exceed 25 mph. AirQual3: Stabilize previously disturbed areas if subsequent construction is delayed. AirQual4: Water exposed surfaces 3 times /day and limit on -site travel speeds to less than 15 mph. AirQualS: Cover all stockpiles with tarps if left undisturbed for more than 72 hours. AirQual6: Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as soon as feasible. AirQual7: Provide adequate water spray at truck drops and compaction surfaces during fill placement. G :\PLANNING\2008 \PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\Planning \CEQA docsvMitigation Monitoring Progratn.doc Page 1 of 5 Time Frame / Monitoring Milestones Prior to issuance of grading permits and during grading activities Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments. General Impact AIR QUALITY The project has the potential to create an adverse air quality impact only during short -term construction activity. Air quality impacts MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure AirQual8: Require 90 day low NOx tune -ups for off -road equipment. AirQual9: Limit allowable idling to 5 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment. AirQuallO: Utilize equipment whose engines are equipped with diesel oxidation catalysts if available. AirQual1l: Utilize diesel particulate filters on heavy equipment where feasible. AirQuall2: Use low VOC coatings and high pressure -low volume sprayers G:\PLANNING\20081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434 \Planning \CEQA does \Mitigation Monitoring Pmgram.doc Page 2 of 5 Time Frame / Monitoring Milestones Prior to issuance of grading permits and during grading activities Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments. General Impact GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS The project has the potential to generate greenhouse gas emissions MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure GHG 1: New residential building shall be constructed to meet California Title 24 energy efficiency requirements GHG 2: New appliances and equipment for the residential buildings shall meet Energy Star Certification GHG 3: Landscape maintenance shall implement green waste and recycling GHG 4: Landscaping shall include low water requirements and fast growth. GHG 5: Trees and vegetation shall be planted to shade buildings and thus reduce heating /cooling demand and to sequester carbon G: \PLANNING\20081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\Planning\CEQA flocs \Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Page 3 of 5 Time Frame/ Monitoring Milestones Prior to issuance of building permits Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning and Building and Safety Departments. General Impact BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The project has the potential to adversely impact biological resources. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure Bio 1: All graded areas shall be revegetated with California native plant species that are drought tolerant, fire retardant, erosion controlling and habitat providing. Bio2: Resource Agency permits shall be obtained and copies provided to the City prior to the issuance of grading permits for the Santiago Roadway Improvements or construction of Phase 2 or 3 of the project, whichever occurs first. Bio3: A minimum of 0.26 acres ( +1- -5:1 ratio) of revegetation /habitat creation within the channel and /or banks shall be achieved. G: PLANNING120081PA08 -0281 TTM 30434\Planning\CEQA docs\Mitigation Monitoring Prograin.doc Page 4 of 5 Time Frame / Monitoring Milestones Prior to issuance of a building permit landscape plans implementing this mitigation shall be approved. Prior to issuance of a grading permit Copies of agency permits shall be submitted to Planning Department. Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments NOISE General Impact The project has the potential to create an adverse noise impact for future residences due to the proximity to Circulation Element Roadways MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure Noisel: Project specific noise impact analysis shall be submitted with an application for Residential Product Review (Development Plan) for merchant built tract or upon submittal of building permits for custom homes on Lots 1 -3 and /or Lots 12 -16. G:\PLANNMG12008\PA08- 0281 TTM 30434\Planning \CEQA docs\Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Page 5 of 5 Time Frame / Monitoring Milestones Prior to future entitlements for residential building permits Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning and Building and Safety Departments Linda S. Adams Acting Secretary for Environmental Protection April 15, 2011 Dear Ms. Kitzerow: Department of Toxic Substances Control BY: Ms. Cheryl Kitzerow, Associate Planner City of Temecula 41000 Mail Street P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589 -9033 Leonard E. Robinson Acting Director 5796 Corporate Avenue R Eceivp alifornia 90630 APR t 1 2011 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PA08 -0281, TTM NO.30434 (PAINE MAP /HIDDEN HILLS) PROJECT, (SCH #2011031077), RIVERSIDE COUNTY The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has received your submitted draft Initial Study (IS) and a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the above - mentioned project. The following project description is stated in your document: "This project is a Residential Tentative Map (TTM) with Phasing Plan (TTM No. 30434) proposing to subdivide 31.86 gross acres into 16 residential lots, each with a minimum lot size of 1 net acre, and 1 open space lot totaling 7.06 acres to preserve an on -site riverine area /blue -line stream. This project is generally located along the south side of Pauba Road approximately 3,000 feet west of Margarita Road (across from the Temecula Public Library), and along the north side of Santiago Road, approximately 3,800 feet east of Ynez Road. The site is currently vacant, yet disturbed by various off -road vehicle trails. The project is located within the Low Density zoning district and Chaparral Policy Overlay Area, as identified by the City's General Plan and Development Code, which is characterized by single- family detached custom homes on large lots with a rural ranchette character of development ". Based on the review of the submitted document DTSC has the following comments: Edmund G. Brown Jr. Govemor 1) The MND should evaluate whether conditions within the Project area may pose a threat to human health or the environment. Following are the databases of some of the regulatory agencies: Ms. Cheryl Kitzerow April 15, 2011 Page 2 • National Priorities List (NPL): A list maintained by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( U.S.EPA). • Envirostor (formerly CalSites): A Database primarily used by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, accessible through DTSC's website (see below). • Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS): A database of RCRA facilities that is maintained by U.S. EPA. • Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS): A database of CERCLA sites that is maintained by U.S.EPA. • Solid Waste Information System (SWIS): A database provided by the California Integrated Waste Management Board which consists of both open as well as closed and inactive solid waste disposal facilities and transfer stations. • GeoTracker: A List that is maintained by Regional Water Quality Control Boards. • Local Counties and Cities maintain lists for hazardous substances cleanup sites and leaking underground storage tanks. • The United States Army Corps of Engineers, 911 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California, 90017, (213) 452 -3908, maintains a list of Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS). 2) The MND should identify the mechanism to initiate any required investigation and /or remediation for any site within the proposed Project area that may be contaminated, and the government agency to provide appropriate regulatory oversight. If necessary, DTSC would require an oversight agreement in order to review such documents. 3) Any environmental investigations, sampling and /or remediation for a site should be conducted under a Workplan approved and overseen by a regulatory agency that has jurisdiction to oversee hazardous substance cleanup. The findings of any investigations, including any Phase I or 11 Environmental Site Assessment Investigations should be summarized in the document. All sampling results in which hazardous substances were found above regulatory standards should be Ms. Cheryl Kitzerow April 15, 2011 Page 3 dearly summarized in a table. All closure, certification or remediation approval reports by regulatory agencies should be included in the MND. 4) If buildings, other structures, asphalt or concrete -paved surface areas are being planned to be demolished, an investigation should also be conducted for the presence of other hazardous chemicals, mercury, and asbestos containing materials (ACMs). If other hazardous chemicals, lead -based paints (LPB) or products, mercury or ACMs are identified, proper precautions should be taken during demolition activities. Additionally, the contaminants should be remediated in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. 5) Future project construction may require soil excavation or filling in certain areas. Sampling may be required. if soil is contaminated, it must be properly disposed and not simply placed in another location onsite. Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) may be applicable to such soils. Also, if the project proposes to import soil to backfill the areas excavated, sampling should be conducted to ensure that the imported soil is free of contamination. 6) Human health and the environment of sensitive receptors should be protected during any construction or demolition activities. If necessary, a health risk assessment overseen and approved by the appropriate government agency should be conducted by a qualified health risk assessor to determine if there are, have been, or will be, any releases of hazardous materials that may pose a risk to human health or the environment. 7) If the site was used for agricultural, livestock or related activities, onsite soils and groundwater might contain pesticides, agricultural chemical, organic waste or other related residue. Proper investigation, and remedial actions, if necessary, should be conducted under the oversight of and approved by a government agency at the site prior to construction of the project. 8) If it is determined that hazardous wastes are, or will be, generated by the proposed operations, the wastes must be managed in accordance with the California Hazardous Waste Control Law (California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5) and the Hazardous Waste Control Regulations (California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4.5). If it is determined that hazardous wastes will be generated, the facility should also obtain a United States Environmental Protection Agency Identification Number by contacting (800) 618 -6942. Certain hazardous waste treatment processes or hazardous materials, handling, storage or uses may require authorization from the local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). Information about the requirement for authorization can be obtained by contacting your local CUPA. Ms. Cheryl Kitzerow April 15, 2011 Page 4 9) DTSC can provide cleanup oversight through an Environmental Oversight Agreement (EOA) for government agencies that are not responsible parties, or a Voluntary Cleanup Agreement (VCA) for private parties. For additional information on the EOA or VCA, please see www.dtsc. ca.gov /SiteCleanup /Brownfields, or contact Ms. Maryam Tasnif - Abbasi, DTSC's Voluntary Cleanup Coordinator, at (714) 484 -5489. 10) Also, in future CEQA document, please provide you e-mail address, so DTSC can send you the comments both electronically and by mail. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Rafiq Ahmed, Project Manager, at rahmeddtsc.ca.gov, or by phone at (714) 484 -5491. Sincerely, Greg Holmes Unit Chief Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program cc: Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812 -3044 state .clearinghouse CEQA Tracking Center Department of Toxic Substances Control Office of Environmental Planning and Analysis P.O. Box 806 Sacramento, California 95812 ADelacr1 a(�dtsc.ca.gov CEQA # 3185 Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below PA08 -0281 ((formerly PA02 -0193) Larry Slusser on behalf of Noel Paine A Tentative Tract Map (No. 30434) with Phasing Plan to subdivide 31.86 acres into 17 lots (16 residential lots and 1 open space lot) with a minimum lot size of one acre and associated Design Guidelines in the L -1 zone located along the south side of Pauba Road approximately 3,000 feet west of Margarita Road (across from the Temecula Public Library), and along the north side of Santiago Road, approximately 3,800 feet east of Ynez Road. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project will not have a significant impact upon the environment based upon a completed Environmental Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. As a result, a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be adopted in compliance with CEQA. Cheryl Kitzerow, (951) 694 -6409 City of Temecula, Council Chambers May 4, 2011 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at (951) 694 -6409. ITEMS 4 - 9 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION May 4, 2011 Matthew D. Peters, AICP, Case Planner Planning Application Numbers: PA11 -0044, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -15) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 600' east of Margarita Road PA11 -0045, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -21) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Margarita Road, approximately 340' east of Avenida Cima Del Sol PA11 -0046, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -25) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Serena Way, approximately 145' west of Via La Vida PA11 -0047, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -27) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 200' east of centerline of Margarita Road PA11 -0049, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -30) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Avenida Buena Suerte, approximately 575' east of Avenida Centenario PA11 -0050, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -42) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the northwest side of Margarita Road, approximately 370' west of Avenida Barca Approve with Conditions 1 CEQA: Notice of Determination (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. Planning Application No. PA11 -0048 (Node TM -29) has been deleted from this batch of applications. Given resident concerns and incompatibility with the surrounding rural character for the proposed site, staff has worked with the applicant on an alternative location. This particular application will have to be re- noticed and discussed at a future hearing. NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS ") to provide wireless telecommunication services. The proposed DAS network is a low profile system capable of delivering wireless telecommunications service to customers of multiple carriers such as AT &T, Verizon, Sprint, and MetroPCS. The proposed network initially will supply the infrastructure for NewPath's anchor tenant, MetroPCS. The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called, "nodes," which receive an optical signal from a central hub and distribute the signal in the form of Radio Frequency (RF) transmissions. For this Project, three other nodes are located outside the City boundary (one in the County of Riverside and two in the City of Murrieta). Within the City of Temecula, the proposed network consists only of the antenna nodes. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of -way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. Each node consists either of antenna arrays constructed within or on a slim -line monopole designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right -of -way, or antenna arrays fixed to existing utility poles owned by the Joint Pole Committee ( "JPC "). Each facility generally features a 53.74 -inch Kathrein Tri- sector antenna within a flush- mounted housing (for new poles) or three Kathrein antennas mounted to existing JPC utility poles. Either configuration also will feature one or more Flex Wave Prisms or similar "fiber repeaters" mounted to either the new street light or the existing JPC utility pole. The fiber repeater converts digitalized spectrum received from the hub into RF signals emitted from the antenna array. Where the new node is proposed for an existing JPC pole, the facility also features a ground mounted meter pedestal. The Project involves the installation of both aerial fiber -optic cable on existing wood utility poles and newly installed street lights, and underground fiber -optic cable installed within newly installed and existing poly vinyl chloride (PVC) conduit in previously disturbed rights -of -way. The newly installed fiber -optic cable would connect 39 distributed antenna system nodes and ancillary optical conversion and power equipment also attached to the same utility poles within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way. The entire network will be connected to a newly installed fiber -optic base station hub. Construction of the proposed DAS Project will consist specifically of the following: 2 • Installation by NewPath of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed as street lights; • Installation of 39 DAS nodes each containing either: one (1) tri- sector pipe antenna, three (3) antennae inside radomes, or between three (3) and six (6) panel antennas installed on the utility pole; • Installation of fiber -optic equipment (i.e. optical conversion equipment, signal regeneration equipment, switching equipment, etc.) mounted on existing wood and newly - installed street lights; • Installation of four -inch Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) conduit; • Aerial installation of fiber -optic cable onto existing or new wood and street lights; • Underground installation of fiber -optic cable into existing and newly installed conduit; • Underground connection of network to one (1) hub facility to be installed inside an existing public storage facility located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Rd.; • Installation of pull boxes and hand holes; and • Splicing of fiber -optic cable into facilities. The location of the proposed Project is illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan, and each location is further described on a corresponding and attached spreadsheet. Engineering drawings for a new street light and co- location on an existing utility are also attached. Construction is expected to last approximately 120 days and will consist of two (2) aerial crews and two (2) underground crews working simultaneously to complete construction of the proposed Project. ANALYSIS Given the large size of the overall project, City staff has worked with NewPath /Crown Castle to break the project down into manageable batches of approximately five to seven Planning Applications for each hearing. This first batch was approved on March 16, 2011 and included the following seven nodes: TM -01; TM -02; TM -03; TM -05; TM -17; TM -39; and TM -41. Each node in the first batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. The second batch includes the following seven nodes: TM -15, TM -21, TM -25, TM -27, TM -29, TM -30, and TM -42. Nodes TM -15, TM -27 and TM -30 will include three antennas attached to existing wood utility poles, while the remaining four nodes will be designed as concrete street light poles similar to those approved in batch 1. The street lights will have the same finish and light arm attachment as a standard Southern California Edison street light. The only minor differences between the poles besides the antenna rays will be a slightly larger outside diameter (eight inches for standard SCE light pole versus ten inches for NewPath /Crown Castle), and a taller overall height (32 feet versus approximately 40 feet high). It should be noted that the top of the luminaire or light fixture will be 32 feet for consistency along the street right -of -way. 3 LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 21, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on March 16, 2011 and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. The antennas have been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. 4 That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS NewPath /Crown Castle DAS Master Plan Map Aerial and Vicinity Map (PA11 -0044 through PA11 -0050) Plan Reductions (PA11 -0044 through PA11 -0050) Resolution (PA11 -0044) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution (PA11 -0045) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution (PA11 -0046) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution (PA11 -0047) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution (PA11 -0049) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution (PA11 -0050) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring Program Public Correspondence Notices of Public Hearing (PA11 -0044 through PA11 -0050) 5 i NORTH M CROWN eiTY OF KIVFRSILIC couNtN l; • GSA N AMIGO Vora, kage) a rt OM MINN* MINIM - INK MOM wr! 0 NODE 1_0 Al /O/ S Mr.1rv.1.w ua Ye YNCygOD OH NA1111 l l C I a GAMMCH C<L , - PAA •Ar< JOM 1,111, f!U vsf11te. a ' +VINIDA VI]!ALAD� 11'x? . 1 NJU•.P nH u� 1ye. � T O .,UJDE OA � yU ....swnarlon ■ , . • Tem HMS.. rs o.M 0 M Cry 4, le.. +e »IS Gm31VM los,amvo.mo 1<eryv�A!a +s Aeo L<s. eJ1 pvaw`ca 1, . . tie. G. fl ' O sa.I Ge:aas'. aNns KCo,l waTS on /Va.s.ea-� *,, C R•o0, Com,< 44 UTa auoptsls la�<s< Mootatwo April 27, 2011 ,, Crown Castle Proposed CeN Antenna Sites °•_.1 City Centerline I L 111F, icy City of Temecula Crown Castle Proposed Cell Antenna Sites Aerial - / March 2010 as MO 0 00r..I 1.L tr y _ kar P.4 i •its r f a"� i • • .,' . JA v #I OVERT MO CO t$ v° PA11 -00 s � pAUUI v s d A e d ar ,,se 44 044. 3 % 4., G C W V NBC* 00h1E /KOf toll cy� :PA11.0047 y O 1 r C4 WeF 1 t 2 hpNoCr0 001 VAR SROOR 04 AONTVIeW C R AW01Rl CIA pT 00 aMrAtgT CH `owAOLtso Q O V OV Te VEnoC no I� b� 0,0 PA11.0046 a y , � Oa fs i 4� 4!' ._. AS1tt CA R 0$ o ,p�' AVEMOA VO) TA 1) t Ee►lt� w c o PAtt -0D45 0 NVe/10ACAM M. SOL - 0 * 0 C OR SE 4 0ER O n MOO., F.44it1/4 O a PA11.0049 • CAl1L PAN 0O(A car 9 1 AS. ,sPa R444 AVEIAOA A Crown Castle Proposed Cell Antenna Sites Centeft ne Parcels na ae0ArrVe rCY, aTrnr Gespos rr.MYA0r0m A.•.A.e..ti OR. ` WwYr Omit 1w ClwNTimetaran e• • h.. 41..RWRrwMM�.l...wr. ww ...I O� W w�I 0*. 14.,rtss.0/'6r Ked,vsw.NW w*...MN :wtllmor• 1,11 w.r rRtgw.M.wY. CANA 'te VIA�O�� City of Temecula Crown Castle Proposed Cell Antenna Sites April 27, 2011 40 700 0 CO FM !wart O9 073004 0103n OF nat... A Mt. JOnt La 0000 won Ka 4900(910 a4.. l 20 It nN39 4•11! a. i � ru a03f Awn. 3 RIC3 .tO 40.••a HN 3 12 ., . 3' 1.70.IA ?O3 AS M'103' I113' 3000.20 1.W »' 0 33'0 •N• a7Ca.tc, 10. 0 I.0' • IY 0 WM ya Cl1Ll 1 014 W a. 0010 311001 DATA TABLE .0346101 7 0. 4410 MC ran a as 103' /99•20 00001104 a 1.9.00 •1 2031 20.0 a 3/3 3•003. 44 30. 0110►10. Of I20nN Kp. Cow OR.. Mrs •W OF .r 00*1 0603'/ W. 103* WC 10071» ila WO 704 PAX •9• OF 207 IMN. 3106 rP NA 701(9 al NKA NA 7031 014140 a0a NA WC 931(903 WA M+I.c NA RC. 404 410 WA .0404203' 2An.ula. 1V4R •00 0,1•3 Da a COW. . MOO m.. MI •043,0 • 04140 wa NC Nam. (9 N 0/00 CONY NA WOW Or N !OMM 00(92004* 30 M /arKPt 133. 410.0074203E ...-0' / (910140 10n31 1 1920 SHEET INDEX Dal Ti mu SN3T T2 Tp.07. ICNS ra 33701 73 3.30CNI1 MCC... P1 ..103 Al ME M,, A2 Amos A3 318.110 A4 104.0, 01LLA 3- I SITE 4 • s• COORDINATES 114 t III s 17 cgo TM -15 EXISTING JPA POLE NO. 4399083E SOUTHSIDE OF WINCHESTER RD, 600' EAST OF MARGARITA RD. TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPLICANT CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS 00000 Cali 40001001/ h0 0.0100 9TMET MOLL •A MOO 211...01: 3 043 3 0431 333 -3310 JURISDICTION ON 0S • TOR.0 03 660 .35 1014 03 A. lu71204 41* fa (MI) ON-403 ENGINEERING FIRMISURVEYING CODE COMPLIANCE: waila !w 9Vr. K Va t. ORC MOO. nx 31*2 1110. K.. 3 000'C MO OM 141 -0031 OF 041630 171020 I �0�0 , 0301 M4YL Mgt VA -01.0 0018904011 ~GER. PI C A 00 2t 3L -701 03004 0 0 Won 9..E 8920: 0031 142-3302 /5100 0 404 30100 (9.000 Rae ONO 13-6028 ILL IIORt r0 WARS 034 M MP.. 47077( 771311 • AL<4WN.0 0101 0 IIIL 13018 mows DC *6200100 2405 b N0•109 M 1004 ha.. w 300%/01a0.01 000.01133 1. 2. CAM., MCC.. 0000 1 CI...1. MOOR 0•10 .7. DAE M • la PROJECT DESCRIPTION VICINITY MAP A T M - 15 JPA POLT 70.4272011X CD PROJECT NO SCA -007 REV DATE 4/4/11 DESCRIPTION ISSUED loo (903133 PW0 OAI1 ( 04/04/11 ) MANS PRFPJRED BY .0• Maximize Comm Group, Inc. 1351 POM01N ROAD SUITE 100 CORONA, GI 92E02 OFFICE: (909) 788 -2170 31•1( ( (909) 992 -311 3 CLIENT 7 88 GARFIEID STREET • m (8 WA 98109 • 111E NO.: TM -15 ATE NAME 8 ADORE520 ( TITLE SET WN BT: CHECKED 83: 3)3739)3 9f 47 SC EM SHEET N8V31'R NC:ASK41 T1 1 .1 TEM[CINA NOOK NODE 15 SAN /II=191!00.8( MI ®OR MTT EC TEMECULA CA 92592 000 0014 ro 4o4A4 1 - 114(41-0101(140 -- 04-- -( /0- <000YC10vs MY -0- 844 4407 LEGEND 14 ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES K 004(tl 06EEfoll1019Y +0N419* 000 0*11001M4[w1R)w00110011*4 *0Y.S 0 00104 14011( 045800(0140 RLE 4(100540040000000 Iwo 5O( 0(0100144110010 I0 Y 111160 q 1411041 Vgde M 11101410[1041100Y 1000 01001. tl 4014YO11;0U E M 4 4000 a 0( 0 u11 IYL100 n 0 440 41141041 0010 H0 WE0 0 A104.0? 1 * O E *0 55 1 0000410E 119041010000 40110100 4 0010 0001 0. 41 *10100401000*106001K0100041*10 01000000N1g901011 (40 1 0010(0 ]001000111/0 00 05 Jda 400.04/.40 US 5810(11®40 0401016 • 4g0001*41440a000pw4 • 0194 4110 00010 000 0410 0 010 001 N 1000 00000 0oY41010140 00010/ 40D14 414900 1amEVJ 0110 W M 104000 * M 0000 1010x 0 11 040p4.010W1W 400* W 0 IH004 1 1010 v RI06 E a( 01 0 * 0 ,90tH 001410 04.44 M 00(1;209 r1 04(* 0 OT.00 0100 M 0190600. (0. M *04 4 � .01 1q 141PD w 1ae900 0(%0:0 n3011060E1rR 0004M140101O00a/16'00(5804Kdr 4r0001005 M 101001 010 0010 M (20.N010011110E0 0 01/114Y100a 11005 004.41 0 S *00201143(0000 • 0t0* 1001410 0014) 00160 wb 0161140 0001X06 a 9rc 11E144rs 1- 1477101 .4r N 1404 58;14 110x[ w w m.9s1 960t4P1 *rr. Y1PI x m1Y4.4fo. 411 6 4458 P58 010119 (1 .1 v 4 k v .. 000A101vro[(. 101104 M lax o 411 r4 477 ..0 411.9601. 14.1 a cob cm..nl:n w °C ' i0f a I Iwfo�� w0°O*9161o.°I YMrc (e.fw M 1046 v .m u .w ue r.� o. 00+40. 0b 400010 040M•010MK 040 It '5841 d 0110011 M IX.0 *S 060 Mr w 10e4L 10 eI.W.*S 0tl1 ON w 1040 00011 *101100 M 1 i:o+eoe v 4141 w 4774 owlmen s4c9a 1I+s w u orur. Imrt11941D41¢ a 444ra(st 199 or4144 x 20040000 011040 006 MY SO)cY. Ifw 040 Srt OmIMOR w P1O4 1010 aw0004314004 000100,1 (am4 � 1061,040 N 051700 O�R1.114 0 40 4100 0 0 09T 3 4r11PR NOZ 0tl40R 111 P4040 0 M 0 M 4a00W11*A ■ 904)4 01441 K 0a*Y0 004 106 0* *5814044 C* 44 (0 0*200 141 55 ** o60 n d M *m *4 1001i0 0o ivttt M 910 C 41 1 w10K � (w vi(49s lr58 1 0(149* 00 4 2 4404,4 1411000111 d 00 44001001 0 OHO; 14 4601 0 1000 40 0 04 400 000114 40101320 w 4004 mrt 64004.4 N (4 100 10 100 014 W . 0.0401 *111100 (i WI - 001010 010101 0010(100140)1121 49 W 4 000]1 0 41504617 140E 11600 M 00 001 000 13 *3010414 0 %10014174040100 1 140 0 00 0460 00.0041* w Mao 1100 w 00100 41 110494 0004161110* 10 11104!45 000 > 1 0001300110,4 M 000000 000 011 4 * 401 31 *0010101207010400040110100.10400 *0100000 40401YOWLK000Y4090s101> SW14001W1(100Sat0410.w01r 14(0E OOw iltiLwr * 1410.101O144100010004Y6 N 0000100 0*100001061. 3 001011000000 *0*40 O01s0 001 *1 '0071 W OO1114 0077 s 0500120 100 40E 4 100110 s 4100411 4411% 4 40000 01lM W0 0100 0 014 01 a1090dY0e03100 EW 06106' 0100 040 .40101 *10640000)91G40040000* 0( 00044 00 :OAt0 r 1*M3.N 400 61710040 * 904 106 4( 0000 0 4 1010 O 001*( 00000 *010(03 0 (0 t4 01 11019n14w( *11 0 014 *100 010041 00 10 00 041 0*00A(H00 0000 4 001i0 0000 146100( 01000(@* 1010NK 1010100 0 4 1000 4 1011 0006WIK0160R. 010147* 000(0001 *W 110010*9110(00(*L101(58 000000Y0g001.400 00* 0100 1001 401 ®(. 4 4(1074 140010901901 %(1a0111010001W00w001000 I N 0100 00 101 4 *000 4411/0000 901E 14001 K 14)0 04 4 * 011 ♦ 041*0*103 Igo *000Y00®4a1001100[.1058 Y0M00000N 009!0 NQI.0*(d MB*Et S 4t10fl0* 110000 *}00EOI*1YNOOLw10011*M0000 0000 Y W/* 0 000ID60dR 0 70 004 0NY1t4w1 II 1405044E 010001 00 1 1O11M0 0 Yt 01000 006 00 110 01 04 a00100Y0 * 4101011001110 W 000 001000100. N 00.91477 S 10144904)000014 111000200011000 KY0Y0 (00000006OH00w 11e41 I tim l mw ma9S eoml w00 awse mlx[9Yro OD maQwlpi0 -ftX 11000 r N 9111 V4ml Y 11061110 4/MV1o1 MHO 1 W0>0 7I1140Wlt 0(w040100tlW00000L010101la Nd b.00 4 S* 1110 0 4:0( /10000( 0010 04061 *0060 06006 11 400011(4 001110.4 m0Y0 001E41(00V01610 0040611040 m40144 410. 4r(D 14.11 40001 YTilmr tar 41 4444 o Dolt 4(000 01001010 °NlUfl010 ( 144 ! 0 1 1 a201 0 � 010 S6L106M116M 0000 400w 0144 110 0 1104* 10 44 110584810 9111401040U! 1001000q1000*000* 0 40 C1Q N00,WO0 *014'410040 oY40Y'ada00.Y61110 N 1001s0;(1101004d 14Ib 05j41001101 00NM?0 WL114;1 1100* 110(0010010111.44 04101004 OJY 14)14, l ;0 **000401 00104 rV 0 000H0N14 004 4 60 EI dH 00111.04r4111Od5 01100. L WI*II100100114511(04H 000021*1S 589040E *0110 0000 1 04 9001 *04 M W 4w01S19000» 1200H0.4010 000101. 1*500001(000 *10[101 x0!000 f1401a1*0N0Y00r(10]4044 mdtl0 14000dawl00 001E001U90(N00000Ws000*0a: 0*U45110V0 wM010OA*010400C147. 141 0001. wau4N 1md 910 om(1W 1.s 41os1ar m9a•.4. 0004 1 0(4(0058*4004 00000 040000(4 • 40200004044 40 000*4Y000000Nw lFUI 41000104 W (3 Mu E 00401 SE 4 0EN0EN00 01004(101; 00000 r 45(01100 10 40 0 1.011. 400 010E 100Y111019.�ODY4d00A040011Yt 0VO3D0l KOOtW% 910041 0 N 00 00580 0 4001 Owm 11(10 0111-00 YYLDOG U(I]LL 1 04 0000. 001061.®0 4141'1* 0001600 * s 4000 n (40000100000100 30040400006d1Em00 000100 00 1' 110E IO0 06 *10 4* 00YO YD0 1100 14 Coal 0 Rw 11>R 1. 419 10]0 Y*a! 00.010 K 400;0 0001120 041( 0001619 010 4 ®100041 000 0 000 00000 04 1 06110 3000 0 K 4110 000®4 1 0000 20414000 M 0N110000I40 10 00 90 N 00 0 0:110 0 .t 04 040010 00100 011 4 0300100EN 0101101 144 Y Y 0 416 N 0/ Y 0* 001000 1583000 0 1 K 000101040.106061060 200(Y�00S(wi0100M 2 Y 01((4 000 00101E 6*O,m001144 1104 n M mso 1141110G 01416. 0160 600 663 0 1010 ;01 00(0 1* 101444Ywm14wm1014 *4O*7( Sm1Y001i00110000( 010* *0 010 0( 1®0 D 3 11.000(0 0 %400400( o� 0000 s 94* Ituw 6dYAm1 Or0 GENERAL NOTES 2 I1Kt *0 *001/610*OS GIGS 1043110001.4010 1 •v04 0 'r0 1 100404 P 4 A H w 40048 0100466. 01114;1 H1A4. 000 40 91* 000000 00 0025010. W 411 4 004) Od ro 0040304 4 0 H1.Hx w (11. 1 101/0200(01 11001 A 01041 040100 w 1 • 000610 (0011640 0• 0164* 400* 001144 1.(114010(1400 ( rw u4>ga1w� Ic* w6o(. } * 0 40 410141 040 10 * 0 0.P 0O 40041ro 6 01 011 0 5804. 1 010114 4 * W 10 01P 100: 10 0 POEO 4006. roRR 0 004014 H93'Z1 tlroYYw 10(10 0100SA. V. 100111/10. 1 *11005!03) E (I* 04*01 00 1014040 (11(0 1K I4aL 101 0101 00 • 04401140400001010*. 1. 011900(040* Y 0001 130/1 40 4 40,05 10 *900 1 114* 0110 1010 1*404 Ir 1034* 0040rs 40 /1( 0004 111 0* 0011 004 40004; 0 44c0 0 41100 141 0 1mw10w 94)0.0 0 0900 0 0( 94104 900 V0 04a44*0 4rRW 44(101141100 O41rm120 � *00011 0 004 IU* 09 0 ( *0 01011 ■ K *I B60H I= AWM0V00tU ICY 14010 10000 r 0001p111W1 0041 01(00 0450O *10OV1360*. SOw0001000AIM0010YF914E10060A090 10 010100 6. • M0000013 4011Y0114Efaro 0)0s 0000040 _ 4c 1*c44r1e4u1Y�1aN.do 441 •0104030 6'11010 *410 1. N 90.1 MOOT W 14)104[ 14>E 1 0 -, - (44. 0580 w 161 0.11 *20wwndlid ! 341731 0(00 14(0 0OM01111 w* 0(040 snn 064 1 0 100 11• 001 9010 dI 004 rK4 1 9 0( 0'0091 0601 40.00. 000 0 *E6 I(A' 1140 19441100 tin • *1 77 00 VY 411[ 6414 0 Olt 10 00( 0.201 Y d*H9 0458 0 ,Y0 w N* 9LH * 116 11 0000 1 41 01 40443030 0 105 11 1 11 �• uv1 410 4. 4 0 10 wa100 10 (T11*. EM IOW ( 000 0140 010ps(O51w1 580 600 0001 14011s'0(1 M6AOIm1KD701 Ita4101e la 4131 > �p * 10000 0 0( 001 0 11[01 {abOSO ! 900011.'010 W/7 0Y* 000000. 001010014 Y1, 0 0 (01 014 4wN S*S Y 100 00 K w YCb*tK(0((IE 9 4000000000 4.®1410 a(o1 000 0 01011 0 0S 1000 44 04m �i60 MHEN A &CAB1E0C118&AE iW 0 00 4.� 004 00106 O 41000 044011 0 000 4410 as 405 O 04 O 0106 00440 •*a O *00104 0 0101 001 405 0 0 0* 0444) 0000 Y0*1 04/ 401HCa 04! 000 000401 x58 119 46774111 100 '!11 �u 0000(0 440 0 0 000 004 0 004 00 000 Y�Y.�i.Dlrx(r[a 000804004000 IN(OR40)0N 0240/00 010 350.0113 R. 341.41 1056 n. rd W I/O 41 v -r 4Y 34.0 '41-4 4/0 0/A rw m W 1(11 WA W06c0 n' n • 0' v 3 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULES 1) / "TM-15� ISSUED FOR: (r( 00011 10.139900.1E CCI PRO.V(1 00. SCA -007 PIANS P4EP050 ON REV. 4 DA TE 4/4/11 OESCRIPRON WISP "` Maximize Com Group, Inc. 1351 0000046 ROY) 541E (00 COROw` CA 92882 OFFICE, (909) 786 -2170 FA%: (909) 992 -3113 - / 400M001401�44.��•�- Li CRQYN ( 1ti i 768 0110(01114 540E£T SG1mE. EA 98)09 ` wECOCWM010.010 SITE NO,: TM -15 / y • y _ • • - , • , • • • - • N. • ••• • — 01111■11111=11111111M Ine:Wave tr.^. • ••• IVY 1••••• •••••• •••■••••••• IOWAN. ••••• *04 ••••••• green ur• ••••••.. ••• 1. • • • IP 1•111111=1=11 FLEX WAVE PRISM 11•••••••• •••••••••••• ••••••• •■■ ••••••••••• ••■••■■••• !Wan. alultl•band Panel owns. Dual PalarttaVon 1461f.powst Nam WWI% w 1 Adjust Elaculcal Downie% 0 IN Y.—. • p.m./ o •••• • At I •-• 142 216 rat I ': "7.:" t . ntr. t n•r. • .. 11*••••••• 4.1•11 ••■1147 • II. • •••••••• ••■• dim/. •••41.. - • — t y-- •••-• -- ' • - -.. ••=11•••••• KSThIIfl •••••••■ C••••••• =t - •=.7... 3 kl.S`• • - • a I ft • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••■•••••••••••••••••■•••••• .••••■■••.•.••=••••••.• ••••••••••••••■•••■••••••••••■••• '... 1■ • •■•71••;:f...7•:• • •=•••■• •■••••••••••••••••••••••••■•••••••••1•••••■••••••••••••■••■•• =•••••••■••••••••••■••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••■••• V. ma.. .■•••••••■• •••••••■• •••••••■•••••••••• •■••••••••• ••• KATHREIN ANTENNA 742-215 2 KIITHREIn SCALA DIVISION }741.• -I: 11.0.1 • ••••••••• •••••••••• • ••••. ••••••• •• t•••••••••• KEITHI1E111 SCALA DIVISION ••••••••••••• - • ••• 1 14: hal hAr•11■•.•..4..1.4la44. 1 aftre `IN ••• • •••• sr :ta.• • •• • - """' • - ••••_- `r.:'.. .:".. '''' .-... .... ... .. ' - ' 1--. ' '"' 744:1•___-._..1.4._, , f1"; _ :::- ti•-• .. "' ' ....,-wc,..x.,.......z. , 086 900 tee Dwarf,/ DaNfraul Mamma an Inkoatal Cantor* PAL I • -7:F71 tn-lp tr• I no••• O.* ...I •-• • 1•4•• •••• • •-•-•• ••••• • ■■••••••-• ■ KATHRIEN ANTENNA 742-223 C T - M.731 5 ] CCI PRONCT NO. SCA-007 REV. DATE 4/4/11 DESCRIPTION paw \••■■•• MO) (Olt DOWN, ISSUE 08141, ( 0 4 / 0 4 / 1 1 ) MANIS 0 84. 0 li p MaxComm. imize Can Group, Inc. 1351 POMONA RCM SUIE 100 CORONA, CA 92882 00 4144141 (909) 786-2170 94.01 (009) 992-3113 •••••• •■• •••••••• •••• CUENT: 788 OLA9121D SIKES SEATTLE, WA 98109 nor.crowneoalb.com SITE NO.: TM- 15 5 15! NAME & ADDRESS: BEM NERORK MODE 15 1 WO 92 II LIDISID 11,18109 NOMA MIME TEMECULA CA 92592 ( 94xt nne MANIVCIlikt 5MCIfEATION5 FULL BUILD PHOTtSIM `VICINITY MAP ; I4 SITE PHOTO - VIEW 2 APPROXIMATELY 74' FROM NODE LOCATION SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 APPROXIMATELY 95 FROM NODE LOCATION ) "TM -15� ISSUED FOR 7, P :7o NO 43920837 CC1 PROJECT 170. SCA -007 DATE A /e /11 CURRENT 559E DAM (0 PLANS PREPARED NY �• l Maximize Comm. J Group, Inc. 1 35T POUONA ROAD 5911E loo CGRORA CA 92802 OFFICE: (909) 780 -2170 rOJC (909) 992 -3173 N : C R O WN .v it 708 CAREI000 STREET StATIIE. NA 90109 . n. Cron8t059e.COn1 /sat ND: TM -15 517E PANE k ACORES5: TENECU1A NETWORK NODE 15 aR a 811060 IUD Mr DON 0109219 TENEC7DA CA 92592 St,71 DUE' EXI;IING 7I(E FN0105 DRAWN RP ICRECICE0 OF- 99EPTI0 877 SD SC DI SHEET AMBER REti9sNc P1 1 5 t YK, Q 0 1.Ai0G4OYO u(urc OWLS 00 ; 1100 74, 10. 41•01 Mf 1 En t0L S 0C10 40104 R SF/1 11•10 4141111$ )Y-97G R1CCOOS IOWAN, 1U /4 61 W OW OE T 404(0 00100 1070 ON 1.001 L1 O I0AC1. 114 CCOORJCIOR WO. 00C 0•010 BLOSOBOS /46 E5 10 0 4 S 40000.0 0 ALL 0 LOBS 1.1101000 t TOW NOT 1 L 70( w M OR 001 011 RECORO BY 1, 010101 10 1000$ 1 (4840 004'40 4 0011000 44 •1 1 46$0 4 01 NO 101 1101[ (NM 010) AM 4161015 01( $01[5 NUM CO,51R0000 MAE 0YL TOLE FREE 1 -600- 221 -2600 u OW �00 wOruAe 4.81 de.~.. 1■101.. SITE PLAN • • ` R1 (E) JOINT UTILITY POLE TM -15 4 / / /r / / / / IJV, 010 - 310-011 I NOR TM -15 :'A R44 40(304003! CO IMO1EC! M0 SCA -007 441,6 PREPARI0 Er Maximize Com . W Group, Inc. 1357 POMONA ROAD 5011E (00 CORONA. CA 92662 017014: (909) 786 -2170 FAA (909) 992 -3t 1" - CLAN ?. 4TE 90 [rj CROWN 66 0+4:70.0 510011 E031IE. WA 94404 ww crowr.comt,.crrrr. TM —15 S.11 NAME G ADDRESS: 1EIlECIRA NEIWORK NODE 15 MI5 0010@10, 1f IQ6 owe 111waa TEMECULA CA 92597 (WIT TIN. 511 PLAN 9 BAB 0711400 ti? - MPRO1710 Br M. SC 4M 5444!I 494741101. 14E\5'05 E =4 Al 1 ) NORTHWEST ELEVATION .8 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION CROwM G�4TEG A4Ax a�EAQ_v 1. M57µ7, B' OLD x000 CROSS ARIA AT 29' -0• TM -15 GRADE BOA TO BE PAINTED BROWN 2 ATTACH (3) PANEL ANT. (RATNREIN 742 215) TO BE PAINTED BROWN. TPA FOIE NO 43999511 S ATTACH (3) PANEL ANT. (RANKIN 142 223) 10 BE PAINTED CROWN. 4, N51ALL CROW CASTLE'S RADA'S AT 9:00 P0SmoN. TO BE PAINTED BROWN. 5. MSTALL DKCONNEC) SNATCH 044 4 OFT' OF POLE(u9NC uNISTROTS) AT 9.00 POSITION. (SEE DEIAL SHEETS) TO BE PAINTED BROWN. 6. INSTALL NEWPA)8 4 COAX RISER SCII 40 AI 10:50 POS'OON TO BE PAINTED BROWN. MAKE -READY NOTES 1 (7) PIM 11143 000/00 POWER SPACE PI.AN VIEW 3 COMMUNICATION SPACE PLAN VIEW : { 2 14AA NO06 POLE J EQUIP. SPACE PLAN VIEW Fes/ DATE 4/ 4/1 1 0(508(07 R4 CWIUIT 1l DATE 04/04/11 PLA5 PREPARED BT tri Maximize Com 1 Wo Group, Inc. 1 351 PCNONA ROAD 5077E 100 CORONA, CA 92782 OFFICE'- (909) 786 -2170 FAX: (90) 992 - 37)3 CLAW: CC1 PROJECT N0. SCA -007 Vii' CROWN 7 178 BARREL) STREET SEATTLE. WA 98104 AaowncaM1x.com S1TE t81. TM -15 SITE NALIE & ADDRESS: IEIE6UTA NE1VO14K NODE 15 AM II 81.0113 RI, Of C@ 8 *UM 44016 10 TELCCU■ CA 92597 WET TILE 11 . IkVATIoN5 d Rae )71L5 J RAWN BY: I I1 �C , NECREO BY1 4p1R01(8 IN: IA SC EU SHEET ' MOON: A2 1 nNIN MIN.L Nen Io ai n4. etE.w a slut 4.4 s N • RTHEA T ELEVAT • N � 1 ? 1 M 1 EU1 -9 B 0�4 1Y VOW 00.E • .at 460 Nt.Nmo 4E45 11.7 ° "` el)-544"`" IW mf n.0 IN MOO Fo- .MiE 0440414 CROWN CASTLE MARERFAOY 1. INSTAL 8 01.0 W000 CROSS ARM AT 29 " -0 CRACE 14.0A TO 8F PA04400 BROM% 2- ATIACN (3) PANEL ANT (IUINREM 142 215) TO OE PMIIED DROWN. 3. ATA04 (3) PANEL ANT. (KATNRE114 742 223) no BE PANTED BROWN. 4. INSTALL CROON CA51LE'5 RA7A0:5 Al 900 POS4AON. TO BE MATE() 8RORA. 5 INSTALL DISCONNECT SYAICN MIN 4 OFF OF 60LE(4090 0185111015) AT 900 00500000 (5E1 DETAL SNEETS) TO BE PANTED BRONN. 6. 0451ALL NEWPARI 4' CON( RISER SCN 40 AT 10:50 6051I0ON TO RE PANTED BROWN. (ONO VICE NOM POLE POWER SPACE PLAN VIEW I COMMUNICATION SPACE PLAN VIEW 500 NO• 4 0C/EP ATM -15� DATE 4/ 4/11 DESCRIPTION ORSP OA POLE 11043990674. CO PROJECT NO SCA -007 �• 4 Maximize Com ) Group, Inc. 1 351 POMONA ROAD S LATE 100 C ORONA. CA 92082 O FFICE (909) 206 -2110 F AR: ( 994. 311..... _ / Cl va: 7 68 WRFC() STREET S EATTLE. LEA 98109 • .aoxnceSlle.com TM -1 OVAII HEET 1116 M AL5 RAWN ETC ECRED 01 MT SC SHUT N40411611 A3 / 1 511E WYE d ADDRESS: ICIECULA NLIWI#IK I ODD 15 IMMO MOW DAWN OWE MORIRIC TEMECULA CA 92592 9 Y MOUNTING PLATE DETAIL NOTICE REQUIRED G095 SIGNAGE = .11111111•=111 Mad 14 t ri PIPE ATTACHMENT DETAIL P 13 CROWN CASTLE ANTENNA ATTACHMENT 1-M10 DBL ARM ATTACHMENT DETAILS fib 12 �3. Wiz= ==_=.— ,b,. °-{ 11 1 n 4v frw- fts CROWN CASTLE EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION FRairl SPUTTER TOP AM atz F ' j' TOP VI o FRONT VIEW .511E -1115Y S- 3- CPUSE -L -N SPUTTER r I .n STAND OF BRACKET NOT USED FRCNr WV? SIULVI ti Mi 8 ANTENNA SIDE BY SIDE MOUNTING BRACKET . 7 =TA= TSB ." m DISCONNECT TRI BAND FLEX WAVE RADIO T 8 J 14 1- -- 13 6 KATHRE N ANTENNA 742 -223 6- b KATHREIN ANTENNA T42 - 215 ATM -15� .nM POLE x8. 4]99083[ ISSUED FOR CURRENT ISSUE CO MAO ND SCA -007 DATE: Pw25 PREPARED 8Y- � Maximize Comm Group, Inc. 1 357 POMONA ROAD SUITE IOD CORONA. 50 92682 0 0000 : (909) 286 •2170 F AX: (909) 992 -3113 V CRM c 1� r( 768 QAR8TELO STREET SEATTLE. NA 98109 .. .MpsUe.eem DESCRIPTION silt No.: TM -15 511E WYE & ADDRESS: TEIECULA NETWORK WOE 15 INN 71Er/0 ®I.f w FUNK Mal e TEMECULA CA 92592 ( SHEET UM EGLIPMEN(7E1AL5 "CRAYON BY: CNECEID 771: Yf SC WET 5086ER AP79MRD 6P: RONEPOPI A 1 U C TM -21 NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE NORTH SIDE OF MARGARITA RD. 340' EAST OF AVENIDA CIMA DEL SOL TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPLICANT CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS COMM (4310L 131404003. 1110401 MM«011, 181 14 5 IMI 1 011 r. ( ,0 4 141 - 0410 caw.: 007940 MAMA R10.4 (0(7) 310 -17(5 Or . MYM. MOO 110.0100 ormmml. sigmas Mp_ (0051114 •,011 OR:13 COMOMOM l0e f naa. M10.(: (065) r1 -1707 JURISDICTION 1170! 9J914R Mid( OL M id M 97309 -1033 1.1 (61) 314.048 ENGINEERING FIRM/SURVEYING CODE COMPLIANCE: Ib+ la ax MI - 919 100 Meow os CONMM W MY.rt 06 -411 µ mx 009_04/2 -311. COORDINATES W: !081.6 ,ONO _,37.43140 SK OKOCOS IM.00* Rao: ((49 (19-076 . 4*0 AM ...SS Wm SC 1090440 64986 M KOMOMY MM 314 OWNS ( ,91100 M.c 0 a 606300 m Lac. o9tMM9 .. s Mn 00./Cn/a.n 01.1409 I TAO GtI COO. orcn9u CAM 1 n 1Otcl 01 0 rmOM (I) WV »••0 MmM ,0(. .1c, - MM 904 "MI6 Mari r 0 3 40.. 0 MO 4WM01 Na.7 MOSM( •500.90 (0,Vµ.3 WI 19 13)00 MOW rc. 4 • 11 6041*( 39(1 ,Ion 3a( O qY ,• ,1 0. 71. SCUM M9MM 8 1 n 0 1. 3011 1E. 13 01 0441 101001 0 , } MUM' IY( MUM' MyN : : ( I) .7911 Y1 7' 4.111A0664M01 WA ( M. M. /14/11370 V01 DATA TABLE M OSLO M MOM N.M. SOm Tm3nt 0404 00. 0 MANY. 19•01:0200/40i ONO. w,N 01iO4101 MOMY. WV w1MC•C0 MO W[ 300. Oct A1A ROM MD 1470 OISOAMI aAmrato. 9R Or (0119(904 ••••••aps M.,• I, 0M*1..M) .* SHEET INDEX TI T2 T3 P1 Al A2 A3 COMM. 04(00.30 Wa11000 RI( MOMS MI RN OCOMM 798.001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1900a.011d MY 1140134 0,1 14 Ia SOY OM Or 44111 m to ./A 0410 10N/M .4 M MSC 80,7 Or My uA 8/ 0/A 4/0 0 / 9 0/1 0710 (MVO( 1607 ,a0 4a[ M7000 01934. • 6 2M10t 3410 W(OQt A TM -21 (x)IMREr STREET u^1• PO41 0.0010C" (.0 SCA -007 CATE 1 2/9/11 2 4/4/11 0(5491 O 859 REVISION PER CITY COWAN'S 1550(0 768 cmnEIO STREET SEATTLE. MA 90109 •••.cro.9con90 mrn Tqe 0010(074? ■SSW. alt: 31,W: 30GPAR00 (h (0 4/04/11 ) J 0 Maximize C 1 �o Group, Inc. 1 .151 P0110NA R0.0 0 01TE 1000 CORONA. CA 92882 O fi10E (909) 786 -2170 FAX: (909) 092 -3115 • cu(04 CRQ YVN , lti., E SR( NO rM -21 SIIE 73461E N ADDRESS TEA[CJ o711 Of 21 0*39899Y W 106 mew ca i 140 000)6 CA 92692 J S11E(T 1419(: ��! ) E f J 1T/1 ICHECXE0 09. 4100900 01 110 SC FM ?•444 1r.1u0(R R(Y•St01. T1 2 A1R10N4CABLE*0 lAE 13415 00 1 ma 036 PtQ14 3 •n 10099 00-0' 0 *03• 4 '° t 1209 S74 1 103. Oro fW 00 0003 11.4 i 103 100 01400u 00101004a0r1X 0X3110,* MY w1414 [30010 wrt}M *9810 la1 0630 MI M 0\377 *0* euc6c *91 u].1 141. - --3000 lw. 6\114331 M 0\•1(01 040* (*[ - -• 047100 - - -- 901002400 - 1 *4010400013 - l- 00000 4110101 --1103 - - 1\41 - 1.n- 1� -1- 1005 115 30100 LEGEND 14 ca.rran.*4*um41.3�L 0* 10 *0001000 w 0031106* 10771 a Xwe➢0 1e6u1s 471 i fit 0X010100 401E 0 X •C01OYQ 041 411dR 0\09 SN 000[01. 619 •00 001} 440400 010 0000306 3 t4 1**6 w 4000 3P R CXw00 ♦ 1199) xn -0100 P s11. *114c R r *01009 m 014001 3290, a 3005 s 1.1 1\10\1 • 1 2 moo 4'161\6 0001 *0106 3* 014380 U OOP 01100 f 510\1 f1rf1 010 U P0D IIemIR_i0YI6J**Y S W4*1 1' 00* 9 0' *J OSS 0 **L. *00 UXLM0 • 6 0 102 W X11 06 .11 300 00041. 00010 I001111000 Wr 361013* 1100200 w. O40 0011 *1 *0110 00 140\4 09 1/173141 1000 00111010301044 • 10X0 Y' Wow 090* 00 00.01. 1 900 «000 110JI 4'104 10044*. 400' 6104 0 000 1I *4M01.K «00100' pIp.0 0011 XO n* «0000 14l A0* ear X16 u1pp6 �*im�E1�0na rl 3000010 040 Nix** r K/ 010010 90100000PXOL00 1 *3149 m 901 * 0 r 6040 q0 1000 (9*4*0 O •P > J 90'mf**AI0100000R0110 4013 01.0 01014E 110004Om2*QOX %4100010 1,�X35S r 00 O C1. ' w Y. 6000. 610( 801,X0 4 0 \4 19\12 30141 r1at009u mu 1.00 0 00000 110 0005 0[ 101 * 0001 0. 04\0 11101 r 1091 •01 0011011O11*10 0.4 904 ■01 *1030 XMOW 11 *4000! }0101006 00 *CN. ***10* 86.4 10 4 006 0 0 40X000 ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES I 3 4100* 301 6.10\9X1,613m 00106 0\43 0s100r010 0 *09 * 3900 *70\0 1 * 01410 *100 YMO. 30.101000 Y 0* P R110L0 0103\\ 30 * r *41900 1 01116 901 ,4(0* 13*\1040MYP0011Ra*Y6 ►•*010 4*430400a *30414 %t 00000041+!41M0*1*1131 1030011 1.14941\%0 1 00 * 0 4010 0.0 OOR*to 0 41 1\43 04 01 *0 01i0M' 11 [ *41* *Y -OA r Pry 00[10 i 1 03030 1103 * 0\301 r N 0 101 r Io9r 4 14 0000 0110 *41** 000.30 *61*1aa 010300N810610%*0403p106 *041*31 a 003000% 000103 9 100(094 0\4* a 0* 4 }1Il 9000 34074 000. 60 10 100 001® 000 941094 • 49. ** 9X141 I,0 *3 041. 1. 011101*1111111*V 0 000 0100 110010 400 K 1000 O0y0p 11. !41100140 r 0\/030 0111\30* 041001101 6016(1114010 OL1LLm40004 91\3 2110 71X10000 0 K *00(4014744.00 0a 4 K *01\001 00000 011000 40 [413 *000000 t.4 410014 246 11 60? d 0079 ( 0 0 04 01 K 400(1 00 090014 *00 430 (* 090014 (3* fin 0QN0.1]4 O1*R 040 r 1011 90000 O M 01 U w 0011 4wa Oa 1106 441 4011 X01 A 1\1(110.'*[ 80 4I F * K 000010 04 KN0 0 02000030 *}X 00 4 0* *O* - 130* 00+2 04. • * 03064 *41 3013040 4 02.a0 *30 *900 1001* *40 001\01 0 001\00 900 40* 0 tWt] t1*.: 00 M'A0 f90f. 041* 4 0 01\01 3061111\00 O:XRe, 104 iK 1 06�� �' a 0001 00 -oM1P (1N) b A w1. 441 0CV000 X.N*1R X4410 M 1010 b 90 *4 41• {0 077 4% e0 Io (060�i1*v�i 0014 YX1 !! p 4 �4W0� 14D1rt wa W 0'Y w. a o{�� 0 l wp 04 Sw P *UM f00.9a* (100 41] a 1.00. 36 M ¢ 1 * b M 300 74* 00\001014 040`1] X01* rXQ 100%3 A41 0.77 m (6910X* P 0400 • 010011 RP41 00001 p'0F.4*0 4100 4 Kt 1*an•a4 900 *!0101 0001\0( 001 30301) *44'1* 41*. W 74 05 1 (43 ( R1 443 ! 0 1000133 1010 Iw[O.VOIO M 9g9P 2 K 0 11* 602/010 Ml 4 *W 41.1 00 W01*0 b K X200 000 004.10* 0001^0 000 O 4 00q ,61161 *1 art 1 mr9 1 rliar..�rbi 1 11nx vi 0 M w.nwl x 00011410 190 2* 00 0000¢ 00101 b a 9001 4000530 b K *11\11 *1100tMM '9 0 9X1 0 K 4100\300( 2 *0 M10*0 (001 K u000 00 b * 00 0 140 *'01 0\304 *0\30614 348 0 0 g10 00 100 W 04\40 *6 01 (0.05 2001 0/] 600. 11 00 7131 0 (0\140 O 0 O* *r 0440 100 177 0*uX 41040 010] 0000 X19 06 *0\1910* 0604% 0 P K 4 DO011 0 * 0400 O l X00]0 4 04u1007 931 *1010.110 0 00 000 M* W X410 00 N0 K 1 1. 1 O I.4 040140. G3 011 0* 11* u 1090 0305* **X1100 a K*6 0004 w 0300 X* 001* 00/00 **0 100 714 013.00* 191111r *9191s K4w44141ara+1 ClK ml *S 1(07 f 06 04 *0 0 (0®30000 00*04�01010*6 1000*09000*017 070* u0(11. 3* 410 1016ma0KWMR6•t000 fr L 00031 A/101i 011 0000[10 r $0003 K IOC O 000115 00. K 1000\ 09X1 41*Ww7r1 11000 1 *0049917r X1130604 0006 r *04011000 * 40010991O*000K1034006b 43 *30 37 0001* 10011.10600** 960060 0' 010**31K47.04101*0 0*61901902M6r0 04 A K 4064 r 0444 04% r 00 0 4*1140f * 900 40 0 0000 01 10 b 4010* 9000 00 *0\410100. K 06014 901 001 000 0 M 1041 4 003000 r 0X1 k 90[\ aR r 14It33 O I3n41600 *1301 9096 K 010\06 *90010M*0100O.4Mif004 001100030641400 44341411*1010)000*00 wi wl Q v cas MX 0 * 10* 0* 04*6a O0r1. Y ILm r 661 1 W01440819190000040000004 N IW 301002* *004041 **00023091 *40916010000904410003340(0 *Y4 q6 * 3000010140**40/03 YI044L0**7 i10*1a *113* 000 61101.001 P 90* Oro* • * 13010006 Nr9I 901 [ 410*D O K 0X6014 K 0.OXI 0 9K 4600 1* 4]110.1930141 MJ 0Rm00 ®01011p X00K0R[K00115X1 * 0X90 611 0.0419400* *3 0000 R O 1 K 0004010 3 00001 00 K 000001aL 6 31 0900 100 0.l! 4X004 K [0Af Y411X 0010 100 00X* GOOFY 101 *000 1061.( 001X001 K a. OR10 31460040401K0049*0004*KWI * *0* *300 100 111*49*044009 4000Xlb90RlMPO 91000 0060XN001 00 000 00 30 4 *900fr1K900 001 4 00 *0* 011010XK 41110300 .0\04{4! QII1004B4S. *0* *40*0 (10 040 04 4( 0 p14[9 *1*0( 0 * 010310 O *0000 tXf 010 100!1% r 41.00* 304 tl 301040 00\0{01 6006 0131094 *1 0110000\30130 O**0 081 0 011 5 00 010K00 006\014 W 110* ['1300. O 4116 14'Ai 6 6am* 1(010 6 I/0N 0 1001% 1416 O K 10*0000400*04* 30043 00M04140f9X00 40(0RXOi* Nll I*4 *. 0* 0*I1 *6 K 015\14 * 0pglf** r 01000 N 10103 903110 100401309000010400 11001 *3*0*00 Wt9&0A06*OK (40.K 500) 9011 F 0\10 0 0* 01063000 *C 00.*L 0* 00f0 * 0010**t0000\3101* 41 a\c0 fo o0*10 4NOne02 *1 000401* K 0X.0!410 r 000'9** W 001\0 X* 3 403s 4 ,m M 094 r 0604 4 N d OPLdYOY*1 n, N MOO 000 *A* *01410010\00X0 7101*(W 410100} 3110 50113lO 0104 009* (410* 1 00 3* 010 rn 0000(1000 K *I 301 ***x\00100** 40 0 *0 1 00 YQ3 0004103 *C$ 0 6 6 100 K 000* 90! ld* OY OO 00C 0% 910950®00%003043008863001090(*4*r0 1%0010* K P 6 K 770 100®40 604 .000 0 001* 900 P *Q 0.K K001L1* munw6*91s 419104. m K (•0X1000 Wp*31111410010301 r030O 01r400JOW i l lmiNYO*1r*1tlr■0*►* 14\1 90(00141 (X100004CIOr10001400r000000000 1 *4 0Y0f IOrr*Xaw40001004 1 *O 0030011 *r0000. 10 *fl 1*104003m KYX 1/.01 0 016K0 0009* 501 * 94031 P 90. 4 00011200/ O 9406.171 00000 0 B00f 010 q 1103 601000. G101004]OO /0410 011 1 9110* N43ll flOb 0004 \ ra4l0m* 00 411*i K 1 K040109X10911004000 /SIDrft3010O664 w \1000100 K \ 200 PORP O* O 11*>•LL1D 00121000 0 u10110Y OON6i X? 11 99m M i 20u 0100 40064 WIf10110t 40 /0001 00129X900601X*K0000 000 0a 9X16 11000,040* A* (04*f0010 000 r X00 04000 0012 04 O K 90002 K 000 020 *1 0011400000 K FOID 00 0\40 **0 M 00 0 0 0 30 9271 K W1[o1 001040100 * 0030 * 1000 1011% *10 \0.90 1010 Y N r b 00 100\0 0 im 1 N 900010 9412*03*00000040000031310100 30 090100 0 010 00041 0 11 'C 0001X00 (000 40(81 0. 1100404111110000 030 01116 000 03100 141 W 0* * 101d0 171000 O4I*l0*10.4131 0�0�0 1004 900\04014 001 (*643 0*fA*Mt =001(*10.M11PT N 104\1 0 K 004/0010006 GENERAL NOTES 1 2 *4 013 I(400 0 *006 003 1X0 1.103' 3 f! U 106 t!T X OOE 5001 *IX00040rt 6 • * Y3s Yn 19 0,4.1 r*1*11111afo 0 1103 1 6011 003 R *110 13' GW 006 Off 7041701 1 1 * 9 001501 0 1 41X3 fir *u *41 041 611 42\2 a K 000\/ 1 1010 4 4100 (XD ,9.414.l000 0 011 1141 00 101\6 .4L A ` • n' ( 0 KC00 1 ' L 0K<20 0 410105 ro119411 *. 11,*0411Nn9 941,\61 * 0u*0110 0l200 *1 0001 004.* 00 000 1X43 R X\400 001 *amt 1�1W�w Y0 Wa. C Ol9�0011 XO0D 13f1[s 001 3000 N1000r0**F11M1Y000K W31 0400030001* * 914011 *00Y,00*04190 *000 *000 0000( 100]0 f 0003 *X001\0 ttY3p XW16w*r119r 161 * 0401000 X K 0000101 1 00*040.6 K1111119w19011[P)m 0 *K 0 1' 1' ?? (*5 blur • W 34301ww+v *9101 *Ai 91 0 rof11 fi.OADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULE 1) M 21 O' UW F,a 40 P80113431430. SCA -007 OAi* 2/9/11 4/4/11 00034030000 ORSP 01.775104 PER C110 COM0015 1 $sum FOR 1 CI14RO11 SAFE 0*11F. 04/04/11 7105 20101100 f71. Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. .00 L353 30004A 0000 5311E 100 1003((3 343 97067 Efr,CE (909) 10* -7170 EA%: (009) 037 -0119 341*0*3'. • CROWN ai 1 1 1 70* 0AR3I:ID $08171 5341(011.. WA 901: 4 AWE NAME & ADD67701 IN(CUTA IEIWORK MODE 21 030000412430,301400100*03 UCA (*03 97592 A1F;C1 5111.: \P tQ1E5 s SCFL.r�i.L's� 'RAWN bl" C9*33434) 1.00 770 F" TM -21 J 12785300 R1: 000 710.30.50003, 2 fl.NWave'• Priam r• • ' r;.r.. ? - .p -.. �. FhiWave Msm ..., '. 3: • V •. } .r•J: FLEX WAVE PRISM KUTHRE1fl iN"u""1 w101111 SCAM DIVISION V.'pY9Wd1NM.4.1.44••■ • KQTHREIfl SCALA DIVISION f. T7. 1.9 Yw..S91% KATHREIN ANTENNA 840 -10525 3.•••.. Z... •yS u ` L.. v ♦1r•.r �V.w .4 11.-. 0*...l +. • r NIIINVOY .9.INNS 2 KUTHRE1fl SCALA DIVISION KUTHRE111 SCALA OIVISION • KATHRIEN ANTENNA 800 -10270 . ,0770 tl' R•NO■ K.ApN ON MO 18 TA.sb Marne ( TM - 21 E CONCRETE StRET EKYII I' tE CC, PROJECT NO. SCA -007 2/8/11 4 CESCRIPI10N ORSP REVISION 0008910/5 :550E0 CURREN, 03511E 0.016 C 04/047i i NA AS POEPA.E0 01' i r 351 POY Maximize Com •i7, Group, Inc. ONA ROAD CA 92882 O/I10E: 909) 786 -2170 ' 991 -J113 1 5191E 100 CORONA. FAY: (909 CLIENT' FOR. 768 GARFIE1.0 STREET SEATTLE. WA 98109 . T rf.ncosOcoOm 511E NO.: TM -21 5.1E NAME & ADDRESS: 1[1ECUU NE1% RK NODE 21 War 95755 & N MG JONES MIL 30.8009 0 CA 92592 ( SKEET 01101 Mr/C:1111 CEILAt10) PAWN BM :NECKED OY• 5C 51.ELi � T 1 9/P90.T0 116 Ku REASON• 2 FULL BUILD PHOTOS M VICINITY MAP 3 SITE PHOTO - VIEW 2 APPROXIMATELY 120' FROM NODE LOCATION SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 APPROXIMATELY 130' FROM NODE TM -21 CONCRU( ST ET UQIT P.7U CD PROJECT 110. SCA-007 ISSUED FOR: CURRENT ISSf CAR: 04/04/11 Pt .S PREPARED RY Maximize Comm. • j Group, Inc. 1351 P0110114 ROAD SURE 100 CORONA. CA 92862 OFFICE: (909) 708 -2170 FAX (909) 992 -3113 CE 7 69 f0PF1EID SIRFET SUTT:F. WA 97109 .cm■nco,Ile corn 511 ND TM -21 SITE NODE ! ADDRESS: 1EIIECUTA NEIN>)Po( NODE 21 9J91t9w91Jf09Q110111•R91 IEYECUEA CA 97592 C Soom Nt1.E: EASING 51IE P119I05 6Y: 1 en 0885(0 OT VO SC NY SKIT NIJV6FR RCYI8ON: P1 2 ETWOIMPLIallis sr ramoax ONO =RIM a I$OGROR0 00 011115 MS OR $NNCNICS SHOEN 9M At PONS VCRE WOE 03 SfA0404 N.LAME 006049 RCCOIOL MOVER. 0 OARARIFE R WOE RW SAIORICIUKS OR 91E11 1001104 ORE DOM. 131E 90NIR5010R '850 ROE ROE PREVAR04NV M'Abl/ILS 10 PROMO AIL 010315 U1S 'COMM 003E MOT UMW OR NOT ON RECORD R MUM 0101001 03 ROWS BMW Ng POI 0000005 NM 311 0(5(56 M N65 0005 006140(100 LONE SITE PLAN - (E) STREET L ' �(E) ENE 5300317 / (E) Or SCE GROUND TRANSTORMER P DIRE TOLE TREE 1- 3o0 -2)) -3600 i 0401 =R9 554 na ITN s odoomoo mon duos ...co wren.. TM -21 Az 1 03 10 SCE VAULT ■ CONCRETE STREET LSNT POLE CTNEO. TEST WELL URUTV TRENCH 24 /WTI HAW 116(0 0 ENLARGED SITEPLAN dl) NORV NORTH 1 >/ ( TM -2f CONGN) 1 SINtti IJGNI POtE CO PROJECT N0, SCA -007 I DATE 2/9/11 t /t /11 OESCRIPIION ORSP 4045100 PEN OTT COMMENTS 1551100 rot: P1).•.S PREPARES R1• % � Maximize Corm). Group, Inc. 1351 POMONA ROAD SUITE 100 CONOHII CA 02632 0173(E: (909) -2170 FAX (909) 997 -3113 CLIENT; l CROWN [ L: 63 CARREL° STREET EATTLE, WA 93109 two cm. ncoSt:O.c en SOOL 40 TM -21 SITE NAME a A00RES3 IEIIECUTA KOOK NODE 21 191115(1110M161 xwrrwan TEMECI.0 CA 92592 r1 u' kI.FtxEO R1: -' 1 _. SC .4ER 4VUJEN. Al NOME 5S129 • =•=:: Lou= - - — — W A N 2 OUTHEA E EV 0 L C : O?' C I CO PROJECT HO. SCA-007 0Aft 2/9 4/4/11 i3ESCR11 ORTAP RENTSION PLR 036 CRIAlEhtIS WAND 15:42 PLANS PREPARED CO IP Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. 1351 POMONA ROAD 01803 100 30493144, CA 921362 01773E1 (909) 766-2170 FX, OW 997-3,13 766 67811330 STREET MAME. WA 96109 nnr.clo4ncosUe cern TM —2 [ SzTE NO.: 1 sot mac b moms: NERORK NO 21 inum•sroosicsoaa 15 TDACCANA 03 92592 (mu tins, elEIATION5 (...... AWN 97: 50ECXE0 ElY YG SC SNEET A2 1 NO,OE • :r.r7a'tssitr+sr — _ 000000TA R0. e 0174 \(NORTHEAST ELEVATION rw t o r.•woon x000 ° ;CO I)I .AMa1''wa, nn r MMY J8 CONCRETE STREET LICHT POLE sr *MO TM nn_ Ian C- RRwa.I .1101 MM. NOM ATS IOW COM. , 0010OI ' n MOM 10 00000 It 10.19 V 0.8 >a n_= 21 1 0 44,7 c o T : M MnwG. A 0480 »r.wnRV, (0 0.48000 OWL ' wawa Cb0.6 (POE? )'L CORCRLlC STREET UGRI POLE 4(00 00O 0 COO 0 00 � 4 NEE) Nn ITA Oro N r00• raw -- �w i0 0185 0 wt04 1 1•L, .•Q, ROT ' 1000.¢- 1raE �'m10' ,.Inn RIL 2 NORTHWEST ELEVATION Il 1 11/1-21 1Sad0 CONCALIE STREET LOTT POLE EON. CO PRQIEC9 00 SCA -007 J DATE 2/9/11 a /4/11 9ESCR1PIg0 DRSP REV10N PER 000 COWNI S PARENT 6SX DAIL 04/04/11 PTANs PREPARED fit r 1 Maximize Can, g r Group, Inc. 1 251 PONOITA ROAD S oar 40) 8 580:44. U 90482 054082• (909 706 - 2470 E Ak: 19'097 992 -`1' 766 CARET_LO 518. : SEATTLE. WA 99109 wont CrON COSOO.00tn SITE NO.: • TM - 21 SITE NAPE a ADDRESS RU NOOK c WOE 21 0101 •01D14 RE D0 s.19>Call a ENEMA CA 92592 ( SINZE TI1LL LE/A71GW RAVEN 9Y: REEKED 9YI Br HC 90 KY A3 , 2 / r\ncRowN LASTLE TM -25 NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE SOUTH SIDE OF SOLANA WY. 147' WEST OF VIA LA VIDA TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPLICANT CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS 018• 01(034 ■I111H*410 M010! WATS TOSS CACAO. 718 F.•s1GD 58£1 STS IOTA. YO1R . � w artno OV1GM RTC 094) 1320336 ROC 01110 718-0776 3614E (w) 33S -11110 Af MAW 0N01mt 404. 0010 410.0118 0001111ct01 0*80 OM A 141360 Hot (40) 034 -1434 000 C00164•11314 K I OWL 9 490 0400E H0[- Nn) 142.4303 JURISDICTION Off ON RAMMA 43100 LOPS= PIT IT 1441094. 03 MT 340E 0150 014-011 fAX (351) 144 -NO ENGINEERING FIRM/SURVEYING CODE COMPLIANCE: I - 0934.34.4600041 f04 00V1'. 0(0 SOK NO 00304 O01OT COW. QC 4 0 00 WOK VOA- O OW 340 O]L -ISO -3111 COORDINATES W:i3i1 `\ IOIC - 111.4440 M OOED A ON. OM 361 MOON 0001f 01 11E (1001M0 000[5 AS 700100 Rf 1000 30630.34 VOW. 110 tOOVOTf/00M4r I001111155 t. 3303 MAP. WOOS. 000E 3 DOOM COOT MCI 11.4 MAE 34 • ix PROJECT DESCR I PTION OT 311033:1 Of 11) VII 211-4 IRE 091*.•ILTINOI.� 1311011 OCT 1 II OTT MO t M1K 3104 NO lath* 34004.410 CO131 1 30 If 4103 A 1) 30. COCAIN VMS t.00 303 . 1 Olt 1. 11 B =WI *MVO O Ur 1.. 163 *410 `tt. 11 O. A T 11(0 (6*P• 0A in 1311W N 1 31941 11 Y *10118.4804134I 10 t 34 0 34 4M IRK loaf W A 033 01 uNIMA 0.44 " MO 1. MUM OOKI018 • W-9 !WOO 80 DATA TABLE M41C Kw or 181 SOT SOE0 3 18134/ V31 OI 1M)0 VOA TOOL OA MW NAM Tiff Of 130 M 0*0101f Of TT VA MW M. 14. MA M% 84NM3 SOW AO. RV SHEET INDEX TM -25 C4K80>0 5703491 1041 Iq) CC1 P410JECT M0. SCA -007 DAIS 2/9 4/4/11 OESCRIPIION 0R5P REVISOR PER CITY 604/1410 J CURRENT OAK 6080341 .5314. 0431. 11.0ES PTOPAR30 0r 0. mm 1 Maximize Co. Group. Inc. 1351 POUO'IA 00.0 SU11E 100 600004. CA 92692 OFFICE: (909) 766 -2170 FAX: (909) 992 -3113 COEN!: 7 68 UJITTE(D STREET SEATTLE. WA 98109 •.clol.n03MI* 00m SITE NO.: TM -25 S ITE NAME & ADDRESS: IBECUIA NEINORX WOE 25 resurm.183N7B9•3Fl TEMECULA CA 92592 C 33.34(3:1 NNE: '.1-11 -E Oi 8' 01 EN1(6 CAa0 6CIt3071LE 090* i077 46 W / 1004 974 43771101 00 7ID1 601 00 DAN t 77701001 )ti• 0 010' 00 41o0077b )0-4• 1 1/)' 417777 !14 474 mif WP 0 Vr 4100.8( Ow W �w•7700010.077 wx�00n 477 .6777777. 14000 77404 O 33.1 101 O0WMM • 10701 060 [7 0F611 Loa ❑ 110770 RY h!' 11111 1161 O 0* 100,0400 - _ -04004 60460 /U14 .30 34001« Q 401 004 - - � 770377 (7710%177 -1 -- 000001 oaoz _t- 0100070 (070,7! - 00-0040400 --7041-- 0000 40(00 4/r - ycfA9c LEGEND 14 (000177 00111004010! 1tCaa*0.7* 00A 1000 0000100 0 00.700 a ®OO R Wa1t00 4 00 1430 10 70) Imo 090.3ia 0 40.00000 a 0064 000/07700 0 r f 110(1104 711(06 141 0 0000 00 000000 101.100 00114300400014004014011770010007001. 00080010F0! 106100 00 9/0776/11 O 30 004E 1100 Ym0 7 114 000477 ♦ 000000 4401 7770107777716 X43 k a Nt1 ro 00 77 016 477 0 11: (0410 914 R 7700771077 N q w 09 4Li D LL m) 7711770 40108100 4410241004000 0 0400 0770 707710* 40 00901 14 00 0040170740 00 40 01000x000006 a 00(0040007a0014U1 610410064077 - (*40.800(0) Oi 00101 0 4114 110•N000A00)9 0 00010 900 40077 1 /1000 90 710437 774070 0030000 R1aQ 0060204140 7711001 77000(47 0*1)) R *7777 6 \ 004 OWL 044770 0 nE 040001001 w M 14406 18 w s0 r4000rt 14011 01006 010 txl ,LL4P.W!0 IM . W1a0 0 1 141070004(0014(007 11 4 00 *1.003*? YO 04®107 QIwO Id IK 8000877 700 410E 067 X00 01x4 007 4 IRS. 4 060 ro 41 771 A 1 04.0 030* 77 ala 40 M000N. 4771 000070 0 ON 4114aa 6100 4301w6P000N 7010 N6a 044 nN 060174006040000 • 0 44300 0000 43)0 411000(777714 77130 040 DOS 001 0007 0 a9r00 000000 0 771 0070E N -11300 00 4 w 00043 Oral 06K « a 007000 006/ ,3007, 010« M 0!611 9h 4 776x! w�au77R1 0/04 d (*0 *0 431 7700 aumat 800 x 077777 F 770 077 1,4100 40, 100 N10� NO�t/� kNR 9 R 4p 04Mf� 4771 411 IS 043. P 049000. 0 a117710077M000 ORS q0 Mrr1004 N! R4At ,770 IN OIr w , 3�wi us :.Y�naa .077!1 w'�oR Io.w 977 00 N 770377 STC 831077 mIw700 740 1101 70(40a 0j00g4n0 101 044 0006 0100 m40a11f 00 41dai 0 0MOata01d7 OP1R 006 00007700 n( 00000 a ON 11 14 00070a31a 7701 a 10/0000/ 70 01341* 0 M NOOK O0 116 00 040001 00677 w 41 0600 314641 01* 730 *00( 000007,64001 0417 MWNIO 106 70 a WA MT06077ELM 1060 101 01400.w 0 M 0(40/!0(7 .100 0 910. a K 0If 03431 R 00060 Ow*117 w 770 1060000 ro 0 * 0. 0060 w 770017 N 469177 StOr 77470( 144071 N Mr 34 S W NI (7700 YO 070103 000) W 081 77W10 7070610 w 0r*1 000 00771 000 O1Uh 304300 00411(0601 010 101 1404K 1070 an004D R Ot 077 DOOR ROw. 0 4 30401 70 0001(0' 981 R 401000 b 1100 0047 100 (0 01100 0011 0 M BID! w M 0M«a01 !14!150 rose 4 40x4 001100/0 77000000 4 177K 0803 Y 10101770 00 000001*00(0000000000* 1 .*49(14x3: N ®0001 410 43 941' 001 01 00 0410[ 40001,8 tl 0407001403160400010400* tt 46014 77 01 tLL YO0 R 10 S 7 WaRO I•Ja0 LLR 4? lr 0 077!:u0*110l00*(40 a6ENlib0 01*11701r x0 x77 0177C043111N1 0 «IJa4000(7110*7a4* 7*1*0 *110 0077040 4*NRR 0 U00 774 77017 4HW014a0aaap1R0 4801O0 000000A0'A Y111tFNOh,017w0(AYD40 FfY0a Rao0 430018 • HOC.040 0011110 *000w13W03900,0a1a 0.01 0 43011 *0000 0100006) w 00 N Oi00 770110/0 00 0 10 901 w 000770000' 00X0(0077 ML7 0 1101000w40(ILI0*a Ina 4 xt 7701 0 00 11 0 01 0.1 Q Fli p0 00.w1'00010003400100.40771E01 00 e KOft 0047 77 410 943 wMH0000Y 1 0077 NrM 0001777777 11061 0 N a0Y ( 0 00110 0013 007 700 46 304 ■ 100010 N 00000 4 U 00 4 04[° 9x0 000 LL 00 770 0007 M w x10p11 0177 011 0 00 6 Y *0 00 N 01 77 x77!. 3!077700 977x 931771 *41 04 3070 00*007 00 770064 *0 0000 00 70 00 00 0 941 040E 4 4110704.0a1m 0001 t0 010{0 77 0080 00 4 001 77 N77i 90770 a 0!776 x17100000 06 A 7701 N 77770 77 0 0 1!7777 am N1MCg01a 6770 00 N000 040 0U0F1 0 00 771407((* 4 077300077 40WOat03010000001N070000 19 6x10 0 119 70 apa0 t001P710.1000 0 H 4*40! a 111¢0077 077 ee 0060(990 077116 441177 'D1110p00000NO0103tl7700011.4 Ye007704w77000L 060 77 04 000100(0000U1+0300*N 9007030070100770 0 OP 170000007106000 1 4( * 10101YN041003100 ?3010 0 77000 1a011014M1 007714010000006147700000000001400(200704 77)77771 974 001 0000007 13000 00 401 77!770 0[40 01000! 000 t 004:0 090 0000! 0 0I141t10a i 07710.0 77775 O 017777! a 7764 Yam � � 70/AnmtlLLmeo l90 777710 Na 777777.77 !7777 t»a a¢1lswaaae77 la 1000 40. 0.1 710 N 10360! 077 03-0 H 0106 04 00 *00170140 13 w! 1! 010 00Ng1 f 90011043 H 1100 01 4771.771 r.1 xa4. 06 ▪ ! rl 0000rY M0@4(Ya101a00000 0(000R010007(0100071000 • ®4000 a N 043, 007 01aa 430.0 0 7701 R 77000046 770 O 994x0 (077 N*)0M5//OaM10 00070x1006011770 00010 043600 000 Own 004 OR17 00 0500 (107 0001 w 011777 mean Rw 13501 0 10104100 4046 FOR 0010 K 1100 00[67 V960 W .4034 0000 O 7401 dat611 4390041 00}004N0916H010000000OBR00770 Owi WHW6a01D 100H100W4aW 77177E 770010 (7751 100 * *10 7743 N ! 1 N 00 (1 011 0 00000 R 0 904 4 Nt 7406 M 91K 771470!11 1 r *97004 43!017714 11!77{! U6 d i6 140001 7 0*6(0 008601nW 41430000 r .0[00 4777711 Ni 011 77 907710 43 S40000a 7781 1 0100(0003/0000 770108 * 0410000YW304140 1700 a1Mt 1 00081077 0 ,4 1000 10 00 006 x`Q td 7711 477(11 0 000040 00014000a016xl•wt M010U 77!0004010 17700 LL 00ffi00IxK00i 9010 040e0 077 Y 0477410 707106 w 00010 DAN 060(00 tl 000117 COY /000 00 0 1(774 67114340077001 t 0 901 010 3500 101 OBOa/wU1(77001 a.m 7747701! ®7070 950777711 a *0 ttr 97701 a esm4 3410 4301 tO x4 06 70101770 004771 • N 08770000 030 00011 000/7mW 0)IR10A9*3 0 0 ■ Qd0 77 *0 00010 001010 O 0107700000 043706 R 1110010 064!8 00030 1114 O 700000000177 001009R100400R00 740000700 1pR 01 x06 0Q 0077® 0301 000 1 400001 008 00 , /00101R041.40 0000 0 60 0100 000 00 7761■ 10!0114 000 U RbaR➢000 0770 1 0111 00006 981 t 000 4 N 1slno-a 87761 0000.00410100 * 006 0010 7* W 000430 771 w 00 N 00 a 40 110 0 4 U 0011 007700 000 900 104 1 0 (0 Y 70 01 tl (0100000 W O 01007 4 N7O004M10*ag400009w 0 0001 077 04 7700 0100 70 000E 773 0 40 70 1 1fa0/004 3w0 00011 7 f 4 0000° 1143 0418 N IMO 0077 040 00000 600 00100 bm 7 70001177Oxn) 0000000700007 t 9770140 Oc 00304406 O H 16101 0 0 00 a 0400 H 101 77 70 000/0110 0rR 01014 0101W009000A000 GENERAL NOTES 12 1 77 /001 al 0006 70.3.11400.10004.460 1. to 03ia� 114000 90770 R w 10077100 1 0 7743800, tBWR- t4z 077774x- mN 4o OP1 0007704 w 0101+01 0 u u l v1 19 '4e N .wc' 1 ww QOCO�W �Oa'% a A 007700( 0. • 041 4931903! 1 R °7713 NR04 64476 44401 1' 0100776 A 440 0030: 1x44 wail 741 4( 00 i1M01R1a0aJmi 077174046 0 0411: 377191,1 047A1*4 1*0 011 1100/1'77438 00001, NRR 0 1010/11 7007.01,7* )'907 0 '740' 04 0 0 1101 W *0(177 3777 131100: f 101 ad00r 043 1 1477 00080 M 104310 DAM 4171477 P. 120100 000aL.11P.4 3.+ 3.110 »•14010 0.077 ra {.our. x1 9+3010 !77!770 r 11ne 77301 770 e• 33011(6 a !e77 030 >' 401 377 7704 +010 719 wo0/tx�aewl x�t 0 1e:177771: rat NIIa roues !377770 000 00077 770 41rK 0000 177 8774 7716 000 )M401 00 0 0 06Ra 01107, 101 04* 0Y1 4 R✓ 1[00177 R 0. 00a1V 44 n 01a 00*1Oo m **8 t00(0 (*TOP(01.1a 007 00077 Oat 774fW1 077 a 0770 431774. 040077460177000100007790000801 40077 4* 0000 *4(007000010* 19 0 0411 1100 40LL043 077600 0 U1 .0 114 00 4 01 47700 0.770004.9+01Os1 a m 077 °101 77336111 ■00147777177 77X, 61047'l 00177771114 1771 1 -1 i iu 774 1146 117! . 7761 4773 8.11800 a • v�a1 16)13X0 w 7407 974 we Pwao a 7411 111 !o 7477 n• �v+d wr � 010 w170471701* 746 wtt a mrloil 000401(00 11177W1w 77 0317713..7717 0771 ro140 ; 17400 2' 7701. 7.01 0 uw 770 1 0 J (0 0 01 00 50 016 . 63 o4+aL04 00 rw1 01700 6 3 ro 0 3 1 1 00 0 0[ 177' 4 740E P µR10«6 041077067 < 0 0.17777 0 00 4 04100p 704 1007 N lNOp* 0877 Fla /00+ ▪ 009 770 ®R a 060010 00p770 0100 00 1 IOW 1 RM9ln100x09007PN0 R1K 943000 N0Re 1 0*0(610 6Hwia Ra4m0aasw 0 0 !1774777700 W, 0100 Y417*040 11 434100 000 000077 0 H NP0 00044 • 4* 11109077E04110040194RR0000*N 2030'400007700 O 00 t770i00a0w100001**4700 0, gem A.Rwx 77 41407777 (41401 431 700100 77�is � OL100000001a ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES 3 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULES` i) tM -25 360 7/9/11 4/4/11 OLSC1:f0Oh 08571 3,601570( PER CITY 6034E0075 1 COR9EN7 00 1180.!0.0! NO SCA-007 1559E DATE 017000340 75501E 037E 04/04/ AMS 714(714090 01• /� Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. 1551 7104014 ROAD 5010E iW 0090410, CA 92807 1191104. (904) 786-2170 FAX. (909) 997 -317.3 610000 Li O CRWN 768 0778601.0 5130EE7 5^77 WA 98109 w o170.com 5011 141.. TM -25 $ITE 017777E t ADDRESS. iEYECUTA NETWORK WIDE 25 90*380.1600 01430*8* TE11ECU A CA 92592 � 9 EC0 110.E N:Vv9 NO1;5 8 ou. 5 Dr (0,ECT(E0 W. 3000100 9 430 56 EY 517077 18148EJ0- ZIEVISAIR. T2 2, t p P.m Wave Prism _ • - • — .10.4111■ ■•=4•4110.1 4.4•1•••••.• ••••• ■••■••■•••••■•• 1.110 tea.. ae•••••C••••••••■ D•11.1•14 414.11101 ■•■•••• limm.11•14 gm*. 4•••.• •••• e •••,....e. • •■••••■••• ••••■•••• ••■•■ • ••••• ••• tf • 1. • • :a •••• • ....WSW • ••••.4••■••••• .....••••••••••••■••••••., ea „ 1. . I . • • • •••• .••• ne1WIENVIr Pr km \_FLEX WAVE PRISM 3 es IITHnEIn SCALA DIVISION •AA 3•■ • ••• Ian •••••••• mr.A• tm umm •=•••4.4.■ ■••■t... No.+ fir 11,1711f WAIL, :LVA11 • lb •-•. K aTtincin SCALA DIVISION ••••• tt . • -+x MA MIMI 65 1141.11N Imml &Aar.. 1== lat• Nun*. >W3 .4 ',L.... rf" /11Z. •••••••• .. No, al wale, • 7y_ : =" 1r" • ••• • -••-■ ANA • Pmlwrwmo. 444 INI&A lAmband 04m1A•ml 4.nns KATHRE1N ANTENNA 840-10525 KUTHRIE111 SCALA DIVISION • m • • • " •■••■■■ ..=■=4 ••■••■•• en, ■••••■■• ■ •••• .4. 1. • .• , 11■ •••■•. •••••••• ?A, • 1: •••■■■ • io •••••• 16•••••■•• ads SI* 11•11 4.11.4.• • . • a:2737.:11r...= ••••••• AAA-. ••••■■•••••- Imam.* mamma mmomm • •••• • • • • . ■ e KLITHIlem SCALA DIVISION bz- 7r•-••.? • ••27:;,,r. IC0102713 46 *WC( 10,10 85" tilmeek. A/8mm •Nr.• ■••• •••••■•••••••■■•■••••••Nsmire •• ••■■■•■•... ••■• •••■ •••• KATHRIEN ANTENNA 800-10270 1 (TM-25 ual CCI PROJECI NO. SCA-007 DATE 2/9/11 4/4/11 MSC:OPTION 0896 REVISION PER COUNENIS cueRtmt RAS DATE: Cu061 61 r5SuE 0211 ( PLANS 001 99 [CFO Maximize Conn. Group, Inc. 1351 POMONA ROAD SUITE 100 CORONA. CA 92882 OFFICE: (909) 786-2170 FM: (909) 992-3113 Am•■•••••••••--4,■—■•••,•• CLIENT: VI 7 08 CROWN ( AN 708 GARFIELD 51REL7 SEATTLE. WA 98109 1.111 cronteasl..com WE NO.: 11 25 Sat IMRE & ADDRESS: IAN 511J41111. 4F909 *J* TEMECULA CA 92592 E02E1 1112E f 46(11/1. FULL BUILD PHOT SAM VICINITY MAP MST SITE PHOTO- VIEW 2 APPROXIMATELY 65' FROM NODE SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 APPROXIMATELY 90' FROM NODE ( TM-25 009911 511811 1,011* PIX/ CCI PROJECT NO. SCA -007 DATE 0 4/4/ DESp0P110N DROP REVM ON KR COY COMMENTS CuRRENT 15511E GATE. (04 PANS PREPARED 0F: /ry i Group, I Maximiz Comm. c 1051 POMONA ROAD ANTE 100 00 9 CORONA. 2062 OFFICE: (909) 766 -2170 FAX: (909) 992-3113 Cot NI [LA 71T1t" 60 G RFIETD 5EREET EATTLE. WA 96109 wont [rants* ttCol SITE NO: TM -25 91E NAME k MORE. %: IEIIECLNA NEIN'ORK NODE 25 nreraaR go sour TEMECULA CA 92592 ( xI5flNa 111E: 511E PII9105 RANK Tn: NECKED Eft 908*90 8* 90 SC CM WET ,NNDER 1 u�J GONSCMI CE MVP. L061900 OT UNOTROO UNO NINNY INKS OR NTTort1RES T.D. ON Tor PUNS NWT 44.01 07 SEAROWG AYIRAOE t IoNG ,1000060 ,9K'014. N0 0)W.NRZ 5 WC NW S,Je010IC1IPfS OR MDR t0UT05 AAF MKT. 7706 GORIRACTOR SNOT MS 99 E9TC TOCRI EITAWR.S 10 0RORLI NE UNW NNl MCEUOMG 11405E 001 'NORM OR NOI ON RELORO 8T Utter 0141E111 NA MANN F01 ,1 L NJ. 0*5 U %R CMM g IN/COCO MAL TOLL ERE( 1400- 227 -2600 ,lien 7701.21 WON KR wm.. >r.e 1.1111 a TORO mom. SITE PLAN 44 e TM -25 h Y \ 10690 Kr) m 051 1I ! al 0(60 0) E0150N YAW /6010512 4 4f 4 org q STREET 1.181I1 CONCRELE STREET u(08 PO e ENLARGED SI EPLAN M2 VS .. ` \ \ (() A - •WI 747L31 E10ER NANO ROLE ) 0! `1Wi0. , ES: WELL ( ) Ay NORTH J (TM I 5 GIANT 0 NO CTl P*WECT N0. SCA-007 DAIS 2/9/1) A /A /11 0.0T: lrn D:)S0 REV150N PER C11Y COMMENTS RAMS 00079*ED NT tiA Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. 1351 POMONA ROAD SUITE 100 CORONA, CA 92882 OETiCE: (909) 180 -2170 E'AY: (909) 992 -3173 I M CRO 7 08 CA*LD STREET SEATTOI, WA 98109 TM -25 5TE NAME 8 0000(05: 1[I�C1 NEINORK NODE 25 91w91E0' 9EM0L aB8ruet IUI(CU1A CA 92692 Al 2 SHEET TALE ( '2IrI A r i., ) 0AWN OY. FIE CFED 3r: .PMEMD 87 W; 1 EV SEIE(T HUVOEIO NFATON NOTICE ;raise -rr s- _Lst:?AsssEIr ._ SOLANA MY, If) r• *MaO Mrp vex= w woo 90_ .Ron gar. MR OflIOOD 00.1100 90. r an 32' CONCRETE STREET 130.31 POEE NORTHWEST ELEVATION =R1 3 - 01.03 from fltac VO1R KISR 0 PD90R9 • wrap". Mary 09 e r.0• A6L (1t".q1 z NORTHEAST ELEVATION 8 13) 41100. 1..4 >•• r>t 3Ix3•• mid 32' CONCRETE STREET UOII1 POIt Ir) 40909 wa% t00.lYA Nam.{ MORI •artl Kurt 1 R0 ns wu. w1R.,v c0r1161rr.>, 10� m Mu 3••.9.1_@ RI M L w - 00V•C MITT 1A91 1r ea , 104.4 neovS -OM.4 Watt, � turn ,r. 1 TM -25 S CUR ,4I SCA REV. DATE 2/9 A /. /n 0ESCRIPII0N uRSP RE11Sl011 PER 531Y CORI/EIITS 0.315 00/00000 RY /y1 Maximize Comm, i MAMA Inc. 1 151 1090 ROAD 5111E 100 NA. CORONA. CA 92882 O9TICE: (909) 788 -2170 3 .X: (909) 997 -3113 04303/3 CROWN 768 /00f1Et0 STREET SEATTLE. 1IA 98109 IV ••. co o.nr.mtk.o0m 1M -25 SITE NAME & ADORE55. I[W[CUTA IQTWOIRK Neff 25 IMRE 91116111.14716178.8 et (09001.0 CA 92597 (st-ET link et. V /0106 1 0A8TN O1 150000 BY 90 20 SNEE1 A2 J 1 NOTICE SOUTHEAST ELEVATION JIM 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SUE 2/9/11 4/4/11 OESCPPTION DRSP REVISION PER CRY 001111ERTS CEERRE91 rE.S.rE WOE C PREP" E. CtiNT STE MI,: ca P0660(7 NO. SCA-007 1551.1E DATE. Maximize Comm. Wa Group, Inc. 1351 P08066 6090 WOE 100 [ CA CORONA, 921182 onicE (909) 596-2170 1 FAX: (909) 992-3113 INAN• ma ..................... - 766 carman SMUT SEATTLE. 186 96109 ww..creonlcoalle.cem TM-25 SITE m‘ME & ADORES'S: TECO NOOK MK 25 211691616M61171139110111 TERECULA CA 92592 (SHEET ME . 12VAIION5 Ere Rom C.(cKED RE YO WU 111618E9 A3 10110.31 f0 IN 11 1 7 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 I. 0 1 (00010 Cr 00630004,91 0.A Miran •A• Vl0.16R its,. AAAi aSsohs .fn rO•.■.A1 • 16 0 00661 Cr .760 o91t .Nn 81 T L .07. 2.3 5 0 0. P000 01(0003 t10' 0T0.3 L s 1LS. 35 1( 3 6'0 7.7 Y A1' s 1.008 Yt11, 1 0 • .6301 000 I. 00 X 001 VtS A 20 10' (001 tAKI 0001 DATA TABLE •0000 PAM *NIP N M< s9. 0. 0.00 VRIf APIA W1 000 Cr 600 M1 030' 1 4 16 .0 0.0 0 .10..0 11 Nar f 000.100 Cr 0007.A 1/ Ifr.O =OW. N.ao •04 Or our 4000 AM 001 00 .%• 000104 INC 00/00® INC 1H RAC 000 Or 10 low .a63 10a NA OPAL 101 41p N/A Tarn 01.1001 WA AP. 06 COANO( N/A POMO 1•% NOA ARA OM M0 00006010.0011000. 1061C KM Or an MR Cr 00(0010 0000 1180 0.. 060711 • Wel. IOC f 1f: MB A P0KJ a MO Oa •10004* 51NCNE 07V-0 1 (0000.01 1010 .Pi SHEET INDEX OW 000131. Ti IM. OR T2 ooa..oa, 04 soap= T3 ...now .owus9.s P1 111 ',CON Al as 04.1 A2 ...ma A3 601006 M MIAOW 14003 • ,.,•. • • TM -27 EXISTING JPA POLE NO. 1750307E soutH F SIDE OF SOLANA WAY SST 200' NCH OF CENTERLINE OF MARGARITA RD. TE M EC U LA, CA 92592 C C R A ° S YYE APPLICANT CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS 36. DOMEOL 7 * * 511.E s :11 00110 0000 S. 1.0 0000 000: GMs) 111-00 01004 (1713 10.1710 AM (6101 331 •510 1000 0 0 . 0.0 CORPICA AVM 006) 00000000 0061001.611100A 800: (1ss) 20-031 40011 COEIS A60F K 105E DWG 0110 404E AO t WO) 02-3304 JURISDICTION on Or 6111040 C. mot •f rm. 1000000* 10 C• 1300003) 0016 061) 0048111 RO 006 110-100 ENGINEERING FIRMWSURVEYENG CODE COMPLIANCE: W.=O 000=00011 000. P C b. 100000 00 0*0 00 C0010 0 •1.60 L9W01i r.01A0107A 7* * 0002 11011-600113 COORDINATES 011: 05034 1100 - 117.0151 Ail 1016 111 .0303 9011 00 41070.11 0013 A OCCO0aC 1.M f0 0001081 (06901 Of 40 .10.13 0100, 00 000004 0) 0005 o0880F wm40TCS 50 I101A/car/3u1I1 =mom I. 1006 (50004* O1L .03 COOL 1. 01ur0100 OO.ONL O0C0 05. P.. 0 100 PROJECT DESCRIPTION VICINITY MAP ( TM-27 *PA POOE 1A 775020 ( CO PROJECT N0. SCA -007 CURRENT CURRENT ISSUE DATE. RAMS PREPARED 8Y: C•EM: DATE 2/9/11 768 owPaLO STREET SEATTLE. 1A 96109 crl.ncosTM corn 913 100.: 1SSuE 511E 844E & AOMBSS: T1 OESCRPT 00* 095P 4 /. ,„ RENTSION PER " CRY COMMENTS 001E (04/0 4/1 1 ) i Comm . Group. Com. � Group. Inc. 1351 P061DNA ROAD SURE 100 CORONA. CA 92882 OFFICE: (909) 786 -2170 PAX: (909) 992 -3113 1 I CROWN TM -27 IL IECIAA KNOW ( 180E CROWN W. TS 0810111818( 001a 1POAECO3* CA 92592 SHEET 1111L 1111E sf ORA)Yk 82: ')CORED OR. 1C 5C SHEET 4u*I90N I 00601 8(. 101 63 51.50 71 : 2 }141141} • CABLE 80440011 404 4410 04.1 000 - / 646 404 4 001 640 1 * a4 4 0O IOW 0 4401 1 104 u -0 ' x 1/14 p 10 141 tH 4/11' 1 17 61 911 )r-•' 1 1/6 014.444 0404.1 01444444 1404 4 0 0 0 11, 0004 2404 414 440 MO 6000446/1 610 0D4t 1411114 001 OLCMC CO 144 411 101 069446 - -- 11001001 - - - - 41064110.1.64 1111 row 140 400 404 - --- 444M04i10 -1- 11161141 0440 - -•0 -- 06164 4041 -4 - -- 06+464 444 - COM- 466140 -- 044 -- 4•• 04* 46 - 4/7- -x- 0. 00 !IW LEGEND 4 1 K 0401 01 • 0040 N 440 441101 44401 044 070 1•0001 0010040 co 00000/ 44m • 1140 4*RO 101MR 44 04 Ur 0201 C00 400400140 MAWS ID 01 O � 0 Y K MOW 6621104 110000 +Ct i 41.1404444 ISM 1106X 0.104410,01004114 t07 400114411669 0 4114 • X416 1i 10 40 0/111*91 0418,1. 400100 X04440410014401-90 MO MTEM 400 0/44010410 0641410 K 01 44 06 4214 0 4 1010 04 • 41/16140i 4E a 001110 4* 11441 K COM 106 114424110.1001 K 101102 • 004 14•4 1 110•0401110 4 44 4 444 01106; 006.4 64 AK 044 Not 04400 1 4 M 041416 WOO CC4064 t. 021440011•110•104114 WACO MOO WOW SW N 40010410 ABCS 4114640 IMAM 1404! 064001 1100844 6410 4 eat 1.4 swam 4 4144•01240 or M 6064 0416 MI 11400 404 0446 we PO I0* 61 44 4 101 O 0 1 00• OE VW J4 K O 0 ®Mh6 a400AK141ir W440 NO 0901 6 10010 40 114 49440} Ott 0400 4 0 0 0044 40 4 M1 4010 0 M 60 0 A 4004 410104 /a 610 YO 04011 IOM 10 4440104 M reo • X 01400 1MR ORM 10 4004 4404480 4414010 00 0414 Rat IM1 44 • 044401 4411 0040041 • 46444404 4001 140 01 466 46 001 0 94001 060100 4 04p1C440 6 406 00046 Pap 6P nu 4060 • amsA4 1 con../04 Pinot unsex na wow or tw. 44 an 46. mass 66 4 0 0240100,1 0 2 • 440 4 Oa 10004:1644.61 406 444 .40 4•0 4411 w 900.4. M 06 or lac} 4oc • 01 00°00 4.011 +9t wa 0.6416 4wm iAM4t ni nilm4444 402 Mow. 4 rW 0 e Plocoac o01440.2 841 saw 4466 4a 4 w6 Kt m a 04 t 0004 0.014 4•00 01024 0041 PO, 0144 FOX •0441 4*1004. 0401 1444410 18011 0 00 0 60 4000 K iT • A 440 1 047 14 0 0* 0 f 4444001 09141 440044 PO4 4004 614 0 44 020•004 940 44 401.11 011 01964 6 M 1049 410 643 M 40000 041 6 4 14100 041 22 0NR0 0204 4047 w 4.4 W1r1 014 00601 1910901 at Mr 00010 r 4 046 • M Atf ■964410 6 40 400/0400 1! mums 1( 1 • 40 scum 60404 4044604 01444 M 064D4 6 4100 YO 0 044 001 0030*. N 01001 1 040 4141 002. 01 04 944 a ocarauso to 114. 40 60014 04 4 444 446414 44414 (6440.4 41 1016060444.0. /14C 004414 149.44701°( • • ROAM Ca 00.04r 004r 9.0 6 ream 4 0 04 444 01 440f4 44 4(40 11164 71 6 01 Cam .= or • 04 40 44140. 448446 0 0*1 006 0 4004 AI4 •12•04 lam 444 109 0 •046 444 001116010 014. 44 4466 400 40 AMC NU 0 00114 4001061 0 K I164 0 0600 0 0 00 6=44 0*4 00 1.1f0t 4 0 44 4* 6 ACM /OW. NU 411 040 120 SRL 14 5061144 •0 416 100 • 444106 10 03104 1610 03104 K � 04110 1104 100310 6/ 1011404 COW CM 461444410404*0 01106 104104 001. 0 01 UM • 41440 M 16 1014 0 10 44 401 0 210 1 10 0 44100 6 40 642010 446006 K 04040 00611 016 K 00404 944144' 41•0 410 Ufa. 60•4044. 981140 100 41 10 4144 4 6400 4//6401 044 1 401[ 941441 K 41 04 0 144300 M 0104'064}4 N 4181 406*0*04 K CO, 11111414..5 00 • 4100101 00 00410 • K 40140040410 W4O01 1 4040410 r4 War Cr 10/ ••0 010 MACE 14 MP K 0444941011400 ft 4•1 0•400+4 10 4 6144 0/1441104114 46410 0140E 001 4 94 10041 0 400 6 M41[0904ti14041a 00049464 CO6440141 Y 444404414 1 N 0111 900 K 4. 4101 * 144 4* 44401 44401 0 114 40 001 Mt 94 4 4 404 400 10 44441 • • 011 WOW 44 941101 44 0414/1044 • 44 94 SOW 00414 71401 1 K 1444001444003* 401 5 9411 64 X 00. M 0140460 4 44 4466944014 M. 0104 1 11 4 0 48 4144 10 O018YM 0000444.0161.4401110 • 4 AS MOM S00121 MOW 411 10.1010 47140 N 01 011 0 941 COM 44 4 20.45. 446 0 O9 44 00 00 CORD 0 040 4446 K 000 4 N d 644 MI 010.01014001 • 64604 K 019.0 R 0900460 44 00990 440 0 0640 41 K 0E4 0 4 40444 44r464C • 40 MOO oar 1000 946 0014 400040 I4 61 000 ••••• • 4. 0010 10 6.914101440 MOM MO 1000 • K 440 6 W10*0* 00146400 000 4 WM 6104094 1004 041001 44466016040 MS PM 004 91010.00060000®1 014 • 1•44 44 00 •190 04 4 104.0 11140 • • 400 004000. 1414 1154 410401114 0410. 01 IN 0240004 N =Waft 414K W400 0100 10 4010 400 14CO 0 •640 411 04 41441 40 •••••• WO 00.004 •444 tlO406 0 •. 0600 94 11 04.4 410*0 0160111 042 0016 SWIM 1 6 00 0 441 4404 0 40 6 604 O 104110.0 0 60 0 0006 4461 11 444401X 0 0 000 010 9 40 4 4 11116 4 /0 144 114111 ORM. 04000. *411001 0010040 440410 100000.1 101060110 K 0 Sal ta 104103410[46446 •0420 f 0100 501116 019&1006101K001K 471 466 1040•OK 04 04600 0460 10019 4Y•4 446 401 41444•,.4. 0040 01061 /006 041 410 I4 4 6 MC 1444046 941 l 46441 K ROOM •4 0410•41400014 i 14/00/14 K Ors MAT 4 4. 1s 404*46. I MO(0 44 =MOP 0000 O441A14a164s=MO 01444400044 MOM MOM M 00 WWI Ewa VW WPC 40/01 W MAO OUR MIWO) 0 SUAN 0144 WIC 1484.144 K 90 44 41C0•0 4144 • 40.100.1 P Eau 1 141140•IwnN1011100 446960 K04C}Mta46 IN 64 ••••40 4 94601604641 IN 040110/MOW OM YOn 14 0 10 442114 41mff 11.0.111•200 mal4ap 00402 NS al WC WW2 Ms IC 9 K0x0•0}1404.0494169*1 N 601109,1.00 114 01 0 /6. 0A11490144>m . • 02•14.24 Can N r 0010401 401 046.01 4 44 0 40 11 0 0 00 00 4 00100400 41014111100000600 10144 1 0001104•00014 W 460. 46010 4 010 440 N 40 400 ∎10 010044 010 010 0 WSW 414 0414. 01100 0 640 0 110010.044 W W MCC tl 01 6 1110 01 44600 141 6 444 t K 0400110 124 4 60140144 041460 • 440 404 0 K 0110144 4000000464 6h1 Ow 0Of P11010 • Pt 0016101 4 00 /404. 414104491010810010 A 40111•40 401•1 0420 0 0 10106 OM 00401 0 111090 0000101 •0 ■ 6i oi90�441 4[140040 .4 004 a w1a0 0 4 0004600 atl 41101 400 0 44 110 0106 44 914 09.160100 NA 0000.00 001 MS 1910046 016 6 04 0 44 44100 6 K 4@010406 4944 0060X MaK009094514 1014 NS K1a6 YK 4044 0 141 1040 00. 1443 44014011604001949111841140 K 461441/11401 a 6100 1 10 IO COIL 0 S 694 064 6M1a 0410 014016 4004 (64416 ONO 166 a MIK 11401/0100 0m 0041 a 0 04002 0 0041•1 141110Oi 00 2114 4 00 N 4014 4 0404 6406 0460 400 00 40* 4022•4001f 4 060 6 464 040186100 W K 11444 10100 K 160616 M 60140100 04/ 40146MOA66Y 416 GENERAL NOTES 2 1401010.01104111611.001. • 1441 P! Al w0 044 446 401 1 40 0~00 2. 4` 04 0 41414 904 0 0 610600 14 14*04 0040. 140 COO MS 004 64004 MO 001 1 114 161 4 1040 604• 004140 0 1400121006111 wt 1004 6 00444. 10 l 446660 60 4004 00041 a 0141 411 X M 840 04041 440461 316' 0640 0 004 0600 66X 44 11112C 1546 12466.009148 v =ma. ulE Ia14 46041 1. 101 004 1 6000.1 4 PC A 0.401 rCCMCM 4100'AI3 6 4 Pals 04 441 444 • • 001 V 19 14404/r 4 .04 4440 ROM 02 SO 00101 I SO, 10 SDa 4 Il1101 0 6 0504 • 6 V. 1 A4 00411 01 • 401 0410 40 10.4440 444 tfr 44 44 13604 3616166604 1Yi4 M' 44 O4 0641 0 M O t. 5 0 0 WOK 144 04 1' OM 00404 MO 6}411 ON la RmY 40•. 444 • 10110 CM 4401046 Mb /10 016 MM 6aM 4K 1 44D0 • 0 01 24 704 6 00740 6040 • 9444114444 60000004* 41/ 16116 014404 441111•3 4411011044 4 MO 162 M 114 16 A K IM WI WMM 00 0111 M COL 4 W 10 0 441. 4 ,60 01011660• N COOL 0 0/3/9408 1. 41 016 41 A.4004 01 Map AY .2 • 6 4104 4/rr6K4M4 44 11 4 14 • Anew 415 1 IMP •l 010 �K 4.11444.041164941 :4011WD1440er 6 - 1 4 0 K 0 0 3 / 0 1 1006 1444 004 1010114 4 4 00 10 0 moon so 109.61044 ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES 1 4 01 49 0 1 01 M N ∎ ∎4 1440 1_1 To Its 1 1 A0 M t MS MO 0041669.4444 POMO 901 • 6441 44 ro ••• 01 C Ot44 6 0 40 444. 0 S. O 906 fiO49S 44001 4 600 0 w4 OF 0 440 a10 0 04 6ee a 400 4' YO (i0 OM 602 a a 6 166)) • 1511064 Cold •6641 wt 0 Ma, R4 X � 0 *49 77 1 • 1Ml 4/J' 6}411.1 w 416446 4400 040440 1 14 WO 4410 0640 •4 4041 6000 04 194 640 0 064,1 090 4•24061 4 044100/ 1410 4090101 aM 4114400 N 44 Of 102 30(11 40 401 4 4 1101644111 K 611 Cr 461 040. 406 00140 066¢ 1 060 10001 f l10h1 / m010w14al, O 01444 161111 • 44 4001 14 • 000•41 1 16401''4 44041 601 • 064 Y 400 W M W 6 460 0 004 14400 4641 046 0 0664 0 06 00001 OC 004 WO 010 4011• 0• 4 4 r 4 � 4401 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULES! 11 CU+OCOIT 20919: I TM -27 CC, PI4 4EC1 013 SCA-007 03444 2/9/11 4/4/11 0ESC01Pn0N OPSP RENS4ON PER con 60(41ENTS J Cx 46fh 017(7 PLANS POTPAAE0 eft �. � Comm aximize Conm. Group, Inc. 1 151 P010VA ROA0 Sw2E 100 CORONA, 04 92882 OFFICE- (909) 786 -2170 EAX: (909) 992 -3172 7 68 E/4E2E1D STREET S }TILE, 400 98109 lot. COT L M' -27 /1K 8 11063(5: (EYECIRA HEnYORIC MODE 77 W1 9411 9E1•161180(444• TEMECULA G 92592 PAWN *1 h_CKEO 1 11': 4E SC ;off 1 0401101; T2 SN4E1 NEC `.fiat . 1101(71 & %K MEi 1' la Ns*Waw'hlsm Qca PNRWave Prism • FLEX WAVE PRISM r •w.•• •••••• 1 wOa Mutll•17and PanoI Oust PoMTk0NOn • 140-p0rie San W1018 Re A0)uaL Electrical DO9Mlll r -.r V MNa'.1M•1.t•.I.. I.r C..M01.••1 OY M IA MOM' YY -A t..� 742215 v a•• a.• w•. •v..0. Accepodes emend Infomiellon • •• tia KATHREIN ANTENNA 742 -215 NR121NINN Miifiri flWSs NNn2AIIn 2 KIITHHEIII •GALA 01V15;04 • M F.Nw1•.•..•.wti. • ..»• ommen M..N..y. N ..N,w•, tw1Y.•.� wy.x^... w•» .1.M.. G.. • _ _ .__ _FTia...�t.�.w__ ,t.r.0•N M .. l • tl�: Mw♦ M :..IW j.� 0.45, =0149 er KIIITHRE111 SCALA 01015108 • a• Pm aN011Ar1166 KATHREEN ANTENNA 742 -223 42 227 •f: 1..a•4•I IY,. •, •.1 N•I..0 0,1,11 iv. I •t Cent 0. 742223 M• 00800/1110.A .v/ Aelt10 wet \iM 51..I .. •- •_•fl• 1.aa•.-• ».r•∎••me ..••••. (TM -27 YA POU. 90 17507111E CC1 080,ECT NO. SCA-007 DATE 2/0/1 t /t / DESCRIPTION DRSP REVISION PER CITY COMMENTS CURRENT ISSUE 0610. CURRENT ISSUE 061E (04/0 HAMS PREPARED Elf • Maximize Comm. U1I Group, Inc. 1 351 PONA ROAD STATE 100 CORONA, d 02682 OITICE: (909) 786 -2170 OA%: (909) 992 -3113 .— ........,.....«.. CRO �NN I , 766 WEIRD STREET s� 17EE. rA 98109 .C•O.45010t COT SITE NO TM -27 5 11E NAVE a. ADDRESS: 111/0.11A NEPNURK NW 77 80111IArl;a/tl 0 M =OM TEUECIU CA 92592 C tO TITLE. \:YKilF 5P CI k C (S; RA7MI RI: CHECKED Eft 41 (n BO 6 1 SC RV 5 „ 001 9009177: IIE■+IN7: T3 2 FULL BUILD PHOTOSIM ` VICINITY MAP MEAT SITE PHOTO - V EW 2 APPROXIMATELY 86' FROM NODE LOCATION SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 APPROXIMATELY 75' FROM NODE LOCATION Ira 1 A TM - 27 JPA 7010 90. 1750302E CO PROJECT 1)0 SCA-007 DATE 2/9/11 9/4/11 9858982759 ORSP ReAS,ON PER art COYNENTS CuRRE&I 7555 DA1C C1HR6A 15552 0A1E. (04/04/1 i) PuOIS PREPARED RT: • "` Maximize Com ii, Group, Inc. ONA ROAD 100 CA 92662 (909) 766 -2170 ) 992-2113 1351 POM S57TE 1 CORONA OFFICE: FAN: (909 *47rt: R W � Cpyr c 1`1 760 GARI1ELD STREET SEATIEE. NA 96109 w... crawncoa0e. coal 411E 2q.: TM -27 SITE IAWC & Ao0RE5s: fRl[CUTA NETWORK UOOE 27 ,6 2991919.121191.11,2112119111•• TEYECIP.A CA 92592 Exlsno 5111: Pivros 74; 0Y: 12HECK03 9t. AMMO e NE SC K. SNC CI 16N9MR RENK P1 2 T�[ 1" j , NO IOGnON 01 UMPPORPl 0 0A11. PPM OP 1 19100 5 SOAK ON INC PUNS MAC 180E 61 SEARO■O Avw0E *1751110 PECOROS 1101PVA M Ou*N(16 6 RARE OW 3 S51W07:145 OR NCR 10 0106 !M (FAO,. ME OONIRRCI0R 901 AXE OK W*EfAITQYN 1[14,*Mk0 10 910 N. 001.113 1141 P.ttw1C 0.35( 10: 5N71N OP Nc1 ON Crap 1n 1N1NO MA17R7 M 1401.M WOW F0CAwT0 OOMPH OR S11 WOW NO PO7 Nat ONO 001 NL EX0ANC W0.1E5 R11W11 COMP:4C'ON (Nfl SITE PLAN A A \ 7- 7- 4 .4 0 `o o`" � io � r � P ) PCSE ay fl ' 4 ,- . `.` TM -27 LYLE8R EDDILEPIA WIER P1100110A1 Tun TRENCH 1051 WELL (0) •1300 u7un 901.E POI.f 1991086E SIZE P0EE NORTH TM - 27 3'A FOIE 10 1741207(. CC °901!:;" 97. SCA -007 2/9/11 4 /4/11 0i SC0IPLON ORS/ REVISOR PER 0(11') 001.1110105 CURRENT ISSU0 CALL (o./o4/1 1 PAAVS 9801000 00 . /• � MaximlzeComm. Group, Inc. 1 351 POMONA ROAD 5911E 100 CORONA. CA 92082 OFFICE: (909) 786 -2170 F AX. (909) 942 -3113 [*1081: /�! CROWN 7 66 0A: \110[0 5100(1.1 SEAn1.E. WA 96109 elm . c.01n,CO.uP.CP1„ S1E 70 TM -27 51T0 74■140 OF ADDRESS. IEItECUTA NEI14OR% HOD[ 27 1.91Y6111610W 801010* 4 rEUECUTA CA 92592 (51401 811E 1' r_t 1740N0. Ix. [1000(0£0 Rv uv 50( 511411 N �� Al 1 own A.D. rrts To I NORTHWEST ELEVATION S l Im` 6 b COWL W OS NAIL NI TO 1 1 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION . 1r=1 5 CROWN CASRE MAKE -READY NSIALL 8' trig W000 CROSS ARIA At 32' - HOW. TO OE PAWED BROWN. 2ATTACH (3) PANEL ANT (KATIBRON 742 215) 10 DE PANTED BROWN. 3INSTA1 CROWN CASTLE RADOOS um a 000 OF POLE (115710 UNTSIRUTS) At 3.03 P0911074. 10 8E PAN1E0 BROWN, 41NSTALL DISCONNECT SWi1C11 NN e OFF Of POLE (uSINO UN AT 3:00 POSITION. (SEE DETAIL SHEETS) 70 00 PANIE1) DROWN. 51NSTAL CROWN CASTLE 4' COAX RISER SCN. 40 At 2:00 POSITION. TO 8E PAFITEO 8RO594. MAKE -READY NOTES 14 reVePott EQUIP. SPACE PLAN VIEW I- -I 3 4' WISP CCM} 7P. 1:01.9.0 EQUIP. SPACE PUW VIEW Kai 2 1807101 EQUIP. SPACE PLAN VIEW I--I 1 A TM -27� (PA POLE NO 1750707E TO PROJECT N0. SCA -007 KV. DATE 2/9/ I 4/4 DESCRTPTON OR9' REASON PER CITY COIAIAE)ITS CIIRRp1l TSSUE DATE: CURRENT 1559E OATS: ( PANS PREPARED Or: � Maximize Com � Group, Inc. 1 151 038014A ROAD SLOE 100 C OR01N CA 97887 075101' (909) 786 -7170 ■40. (RTFI) 5 147 -1113 [rCRO WN .5 CMFlELD 5(0007 :A1TIF, WA 98109 e•.<rovn<MUP<om [1088. : TM 27 5E NAME 07 ADORE55: BUUTA NETWORK NODE 27 AS[P A.4AtS YIf00 ®OA om e RIAECULA CA 42592 RAWN OA NECKED OK IAF 5C S HEW WARM A2 1 /Slat ORE. t �IG7.EVAT/0\6 s H r7 LAP 1 r01 WOW OBOE �W MILE fl, 23 No OAST I .coo 0 011 191L 1 11NOXRE MY MY C 1911 x'_aa 0 NEW EQUIPMENT AREA CO SEE WOO SN 0 I 1140* 1 IX 1CIw010 DAD) SOUTHEAST ELEVATION MIVIMA WM.= WIT rO NORTHEAST ELEVATION r PAW 5 CROWN CASTLE FW(EREADY I I951ALl. IF OLD 4000 CROSS M4 Al 32' 0' H. OA TO 8E PAINTED BROWN 2ATTACH (3) PANEL ANT (X8111RCNI 742 212) TO IX PAINTED DROWN. 3.415TALL CROWN CASTLE RAAOS WIN 4" OFT OF POLE (USING 0815TRUT5) AT 3:00 P09TION. TO DE PAINTED BROWN. 47NSTAL. DSCONNECI SWI ICH WN 4" OFF OF POLE (USING UNISIRUIS) Al 3100 P091100. (SEE DE1A1L SHEETS) TO DE PAINTED BROWN, 5 NISTALL CROWN CASTLE 4" COAX R1508 5011. 40 AT 2:00 POSITION. TO BE PAINTLO BROWN MAKE -READY NOTES 14 WAFTS 1• EPpAI s EQUIP. SPACE PLAN VIEW Fircl 3 00010x1 EQUIP. SPACE PLAN VIEW I-u'� i-1 2 EQUIP. SPACE PLAN VIEW I i 1 ATM -27 � IPA POLE NO. 1750707E CC1 PROJECT NO SCA-007 2 4/ DESCRIPIIOR 0R51' REW90N PER CITY CONVENTS DAPRfN! ISSUE DSIE. (04/0 INANS PREPARED 8r -. Maximize Comm. � Group, Inc. 1 351 P0N044A ROAD 64,40E +00 CORONA. CA 52082 OFFICE (909) 7B6 -2170 FAX (909) 992 -3113 CLIENT, 7 68 OMAE10 SIRES SEATRE, WA 98109 ..0Plncetlk.com SITE NO.: TM -27 911 NAME 9 ADDRESS, ICICIAA NEINOIBt NODE 27 m1910 Tlr�, 1* I mMd■ TE400UU CA 92592 �SHEE TALE. SHEET 8 KISEK p: f Af,S Br NECKED 001 NF SC 9NEET A3 MOUNTING PLATE DETAIL PIPE ATTACHMENT DETAIL } CROWN CASTLE ANTENNA ATTACHMENT laNk110 DBL ARM ATTACHMENT DETAILS2 t . f NOTICE • REQUIRED G095 SIGNAGE 1■ 11 CROWN CASTLE EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION SPUTTER +.yam tt 0 - TOP 1 I ▪ fir49;,• /� NOT USED omsio HEADY 0 IIJ FRONT MEW SAW S- 3— CPUSE —L —N SPUTTER FRONT VIEW 5,0E_ VlE' ANTENNA SIDE BY SIDE MOUNTING BRACKET MINH 7 ta41 4t 41•♦ I -1 8 STAND OF BRACKET s . - ,,..... V=1 . DISCONNECT AL'111 • ONLO TRI BAND FLEX WAVE RADIO Sant/ KATHREIN ANTENNA 742 -223 MAN A20L112 44aaa .n .n} • d11E1141FM C1= 4.A a 5 KATHREIN ANTENNA 742 -215 - ` J4 L-{ TM - 27 APAPOtC1N I* 50*91C CO (*WW1 NO. SCA -007 DATE 2/9/11 4/4/11 oC5C9P9on WISP BLVISION PER cRr cOuuCNIS CURRENT ISSUC p9IC• CURNEI1 C1,1252 45ut (Alt R NA PRCPMCO Kr "` Maximize Com � Group, Inc. 1351 Po1wNA ROAD sulre 100 coRDNA, a 9za9z atlDE: (9119) >a9 -z1>D FAN: (909) 992 -JI15 7 09 OARCICI0 S1R1CT SEATTLE. NA 99109 1N r aownco.com TM -27 ZE HALE k ADDRESS: TEUEIA HEMBRK NODE 27 IENDCUU CA 92592 ($.7.1.1 TRIE C1WMMVf I•k1.%5 DNA4N IV CF1:cxrn 22: Nr SC SHEET �A AMMO BY Itv 2 A iiii I�,r` 'ji, ?9=GYx - MOUNTING PLATE DETAIL PIPE ATTACHMENT DETAIL } CROWN CASTLE ANTENNA ATTACHMENT laNk110 DBL ARM ATTACHMENT DETAILS2 t . f NOTICE • REQUIRED G095 SIGNAGE 1■ 11 CROWN CASTLE EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION SPUTTER +.yam tt 0 - TOP 1 I ▪ fir49;,• /� NOT USED omsio HEADY 0 IIJ FRONT MEW SAW S- 3— CPUSE —L —N SPUTTER FRONT VIEW 5,0E_ VlE' ANTENNA SIDE BY SIDE MOUNTING BRACKET MINH 7 ta41 4t 41•♦ I -1 8 STAND OF BRACKET s . - ,,..... V=1 . DISCONNECT AL'111 • ONLO TRI BAND FLEX WAVE RADIO Sant/ KATHREIN ANTENNA 742 -223 MAN A20L112 44aaa .n .n} • d11E1141FM C1= 4.A a 5 KATHREIN ANTENNA 742 -215 - ` J4 L-{ TM - 27 APAPOtC1N I* 50*91C CO (*WW1 NO. SCA -007 DATE 2/9/11 4/4/11 oC5C9P9on WISP BLVISION PER cRr cOuuCNIS CURRENT ISSUC p9IC• CURNEI1 C1,1252 45ut (Alt R NA PRCPMCO Kr "` Maximize Com � Group, Inc. 1351 Po1wNA ROAD sulre 100 coRDNA, a 9za9z atlDE: (9119) >a9 -z1>D FAN: (909) 992 -JI15 7 09 OARCICI0 S1R1CT SEATTLE. NA 99109 1N r aownco.com TM -27 ZE HALE k ADDRESS: TEUEIA HEMBRK NODE 27 IENDCUU CA 92592 ($.7.1.1 TRIE C1WMMVf I•k1.%5 DNA4N IV CF1:cxrn 22: Nr SC SHEET �A AMMO BY Itv 2 e q 111 1 0 f C . t 4 t r.1� nl oc1 a «n &ww w u. 4202..: n.: v: Irmo :nun .w ..nc.na famwl 51 .om o011 .A/s Y1 al' ..O 20 01. 1 7. 1 11 5 0. 4'44 NaL0101020 4tt Wig 0 RM. 91 Wig 1 '! MO 31 7 21•2 10, 0. 0200IkY4 e94 .l717 mr 7 2 fr [ u• 1 i� sr rew stua war DATA TABLE .antra 0000 r.s. 3114 00.1 at Isr 1.1, 10. 20E .10. 0210.1102 x111 Er 0044 (:0010 rtrau G. 050 44701 IR.000 O 21201.0 0/01 200.0 429.0004 012C tort w m OM. F. 0900.3 47/4 [ID10n0 MO 21t/00019m 401.0 4R 11.4c 000 Or W TOOL C.a9 Na 4./4 4017 Kt ra NM mfr 2904: MCA 2. 004 001160 41/3 012500 4y. 40004 ANA 46.0 ./A 00 10460341 0 NA 010 or 4016./0050 .1 01427 x000 490 4,. .Oat PM.. .4222 AO 0t 0.201.0 ....„..„. SHEET INDEX 026 01202400 Ti rmr a41 12 &pans 026710 r.. •an3 T3 .w..rnnr am2anra P1 m WON% Al 910 roa A2 44R.1g0 A3 E1LW00 AA mono) moos 1- I TE / PROJECT DESCRIPTION TM -30 1 29* 7501 710.7993277E Op 1YtMAC1 NO. SCA-007 UU V C C I VITE N TM -30 EXISTING JPA POLE NO. 1993277E SOUTH SIDE AVEN I DA CEN-T RM ts)ENA yUE( E 100' WEST OF 30661 (HOUSE) TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPLICANT CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS CROON asnc WON .4r ON 02030 340437 4Mt 10. 5040 ra0A0012)3. 0304 o[ wo 020 1515 -sm JURISDICTION OR Or 100 0200 4 05 001 3. 04 0123* 4 -1 9030 ME 051) 844-0405 ENGINEERING FIRMISURVEYING woman 02021.0. 1.0 .c 1351 1.11. 4270 IW CO2022 22102 C00. 02*01A 7730 900 - 101-003 - -400 -1413 COORDINATES 5004 _41AK4] 50DAC1 4464002 w 0 a: o (•) 1 er OEM. 000001 01010. (150) 110 -000 0.110 2 000P MK A 3•0: (000 21. -1431 47417 07.20004/ 1 0050: 01 u Ear/ 40.1[ 21000 64) 40-3122 777406 024.04 0[150 0009 7500 010 703 -2146 CODE COMPUANCE: .502 NU .0024100 • . 0 210.160 77 40400.3 COM As ^ 00 0 3 4.06 00 0224 /011220 11 0040* 011• 0.4500..1atCraC 1 coat 2 00004. OOOUL a.a 13 • 0t VICINITY MAP DATE 2/9/41 0ESCRIP110N CRP CURRENT 0.40417: SITE NO.: W7E 440(41 '3SJE WT[ (02/ qx.5 PREPARE0 fn. 1 W Maximize Cannt ,) Group, (no 1 351 POUONA RO SATE 100 00 C ORONA CA 92882 OFFICE: (909) 7D8-2170 FAX: (909) 992 -5113 .te ...--.w.. 7 88 FNO1E2D STREET SEATTLE. INA 93109 + can TM -30 SITE NAME & ADDRESS: IEIIECUTA NETWORK NODE 30 02790 4004034641. OM 105!1 TEMECULA W 92592 (5.40ET 11142. Me 54-El bRl2e BY: C/1ECOEO BYE 001.460 81 80 SC d 91420 74U04310: 04025104: T1 WINO LOADING INFORMATION y '� M O 390 90 R. 040 4'-0' MU 90 437 0.1 340' 6001341 9 w. 0 15 904 10*. 044 r-0' 747 215 0914.0 r.r 1/1 1 00 V WA � 0 O .v4 4/2 401 M t0 00 0 90 71_ 10 44 16-0 1/0064/96 19.5 Mal 0 W. 4. 044 Ir-6 •0104 r•r an. AZT MIT 422001 WA 40014 N'-r 00040044 16-0' 14 1/4 1440000 WA 0.40 044 WA ANTENNA 4 CASE SCI46(4E AMR UM 0 '' 1 4011.4 410 // 1. MA 00 01. 190 MU 90 7.010 4.. O 6001341 9 302 1 10*. 0 10 747 215 39' 1 1/1 6 1.0 � 32' 1 4/2 ia.494N aft m14041911.a40. 4r.9mom 1' • O EJ 0 Ns man. 004 4.014.6 46.6 144 NOM 4134 fAL 010. 1411 0.666 BOS taro. 14 0641 41 FIM 1.0.6.141 - - 111{416 x4(91/4A0 41. 41901 .401 940 104 - - - - 4 61 160.4. - T. 400304 001 - - - -R- 04110 000 - 4013 - 00.19 -4- 0040 J9 0 044 LEGEND 5 2 C OMR 441 MOW. 4 0411+40 %x04141 TIC fel f n 00046 4046 rti w 1131417031 • 000.6. r 1 3.100 NA 61 146 004 4 44416 tl 01-04 4 04. S O NS 46X1000 W 4 61940 60 072000 4 004\ xA 4 10.11 4 IVOx(04 2O 441904 xM01K 5105116.0. 4921 4 00190000 . Mt .44 .44.1 I. 4 IWO. WE 90.0.1 Ac ▪ 6 9)'6wtl 0' 10 /r .93' MX 0r KY; 035411051 NY • 8100031. 10401 07 0 _ M MMtot 4691 r 0144 tsar 17.41 Yl 6u a u /1196 401 4 0 9104 w 4111414 .9 1116 649/ 16.00-2610ML40464 104 mr 10M1 0400 1 0606 00010 IM 1919 NE b' 1.736 CO. f4 1010 MOH 400 NE. O..' 410 14014 AO Wg0 4 IN 3 40060 4 1414(1.160 621.02 8 014 406. 0 BE Nw 090700 46 329 .4104 1- 4n10'w1 AC OW • 07 11 9.0 1 ,r Ma 44oc r1 2u 1944 60 0.44, M( 9T 494 40NR 1 4733 040.6 rXl 40 11100 le 14114 miu4 324 Om I.. LAS 100.0 6910 m t g1 00.10 MA. 4OC OM . -./9' . IQ 06 621 • AM 190 0.04007 0 1 016114 991 01 4 0011 40 .4 O100 Nu 43 03 WOE 17 CUM INCE A4l CO ('0 O 9 3(0 O q IMO 99@ .1 44 4400 40. ql R W Gfl 932 042 1 46 0 4 106840'10101046 (0 40R44Y40.61 94440 M.N. • Ij4 104200 1 .6 4. N la 00[014 4.1 404 . M 693119! l 9* 1A' 416 4 611602 0069 41004 0 a400 CA 2.01 ALM 00.6 ACID 910 669 41070 Gall \_ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES Mt 4001.1. St 1.0411 401100 MU. 410119601 0K16 000.6 401 36010 0 6900 R lu 39 AIM 4 9060 619 60 if W_ 1@ 02 40400 Ku 000 001 .000 0 0.. 10110 06114 . • 00046 4l 10104 091[14011941. NAL El. K 6 • 0 M N 10 4 6004•1 06 0000 4 1 000140. 00 *10 K MOWN 601E00 A 4.0 2400114 *401910040 4 NMI 04. 4.1914.0 4014 w MGM... 11404044.0* 411. 104(3.1$ 4101017400 3 00640 90411000( Re K 3 113 11 014 40 4 004 4 114141 9.106 we MA 19104 10144 OAK 154 01400K 90110 06019/ 0. 310 K A IN 164400046 e 19100 941 043 4 a LL 010 54L MIAs 6•02 .4 u0E 9006 owe 19 1s 001001 I ft SA 1.44 6 040 000 004 1. 01000 94 0840 M 100 011011 03 K 0001044014 44173. 019x.0 4006 11.0•1 a 40034. 100.30021 r 400 041 7033 79(r I - 090 -227 -2600 0 194 ` 6401 .3 a .sf6 00 411 0 .044 44 014.. 1 100111. OA. K COMM 4044 Nu OW 16 1 SOL 1 01 K 11COMM 90 COM 440 K AN M 0 0.6.010 101946 x 4.44lit MEM 001/914019 440 sm 040011 Mu 70 . a.m 06 Q . 1 0 010 106 COMM MO 104 x 02.6244 11010 4 00 1.. 9) ➢ IO 0700 47140 06 100 01. 6302. 041.30.0. 46 .400 *OE MIN NO 35 LLU.02.00001 A0 00300 K 000011 1 .0I x 61.40 064 x.1301 81001.40011 H 0110011 14. 844119 441.1 601000 0041 00 440 0 19 CA 4401* u 41076 40.0446 10119 1 110.04100` • x *4 1040 0 004 10 1( 13.7.11.01166 10 N 40X4* 0006' 540 194(07. 411094 AMMO 9 1490616 07196 4114.6 11 *W0 9 /4/6 4 0 0 0 0%19 r 00 I 40 xu 06 AMC IN NM 000100 .OL 94 B 004 010 10 00041* 0LM M 1100 1.10 001.00144404141.114 ( U16 0 01000 000111110 .r 900 4�0 0 � 1 K 4004 90 00 AC 030. 00 001.11 ORM 0001. Y 40 14 0 000 4.0 .00010 061011 4611160 00401001 At 140M11409K14320 IC IC 100 1444024121001141094.1100 0 x444 111 2141 l K .0 0 40 0% 0 0 01114 .0 MOO 40 MK al 00040 0lY{ 1004 x 010 0064a W 011 03411.394 1009 6E 00 . :42/01 044[ 000190 r 04O 40440 x 0', 00.10 • AS a1 100 461 O 109 W 14 0 01•61111 4610@ 0.40 W MAC Cr 44 019100* /6464009 f000549NSW x 010 90 0 6 006 41044 1 x 01004 0 0 1906193 44 K 400.096 0 L• 1600 40 RIM 0 919 0 K40.43*4411 14440061M1.9010 6461490.116 DA. 04014 TM 0194'1 4040 OF Y 01100 40100910. K 602 0 41.04040 10 46 COMMA 4040. rt 0.13. R6i0 00018 AI OM 64 0 110400 10 ONE 91910 4 014 4059004 R. 4000000x4 4* LL 0.1060091996190 01.01 A0*009RM 4001006 0.1165404490.9 1009. 1 94 046.4061 U4P10141R M000MO4K0000 9 00419410* 1110014 264040 MO 446 MIK 1.141.0064 00 tr 11.201. /140 006 19 4010 706 NOM. M a0101144 1114 401 La K 10106 0 00 175013 0340 90 014. 00100 0000.04 40 602060* 006 40.0 000 Ill x 4440 6 09001 04 64•6 16 4496 904 011 0405 10 311.100160'0 000100. 4713.0 69.6 0 90/4410/ x 146 K 0009011110961 W 196 061900 03203 04* .006 • 19600410. 01.11. 4600 0 0420 0 011 019191619 s40IC .4160 004*01210 x000. co. 4601 01400010 9..01044 K 1( ®1001.04 r W 101 41.116011.'449460 x 490 901100 R1W411`1910119 3001.40904 7940 40 81333 410'01 04 102401 035 M 040 1 10101 1011 0061010001616 W 0111 M. .1l6 r0116 40019 0 010. 1 far 0C 102134I 4NR C O • 4011 x 10164 901 0110 6 00 O1M(1 At 1.11 6 6000 4611141 411141*1094•06 0®10068 40 6 Olar . 316 4* 4 41 1 O 4Y� 64 M10 0 111. 419 CO 0 MOM ta M. • K COMM. 0 0140 000 4.1110000141 0100 0 Sr 44 0 WON 9499 40140 MA 90010 •6040 0 1 1 61044440.1016'19. 1A. 0014.0606400o 2000.00 01946 MOLL l x 07444 4010 MI OM AP 144141004 I. 124.1.10 at MM 10.4.3 4. 40 MI It 4 M 4 COMM 460 9 11900 00 4 6100 0 UMW 73133 64 MOM n x 10x04 902 caw 6 354414/404 460.400 11400 411 0 K orm a 14 4. 1441 0 491 0044.011 ■01 MM. WM 0 .1.1 64111 600 (110 4 010100 0 W 1 40010261 0134193611 0.614 00MAI2.1 10141116. 6 404194 94.0 .4110. 0670 01199.0 *400 C 104 4.96 30 s4 04.06900 004.00 maps OM 01160.12 OM. 100/196 41 1000 14® • Y190 440 M 944 00•04023 MR Al 0020100010141 14 109 196•46 914 6 06 0 6 1444 a W Inato 0002 MA rt ▪ 19 T MOM 1166 1040K44.1944416( 1 101 . 10 61400 10910 000 904 Ms • • NCI 0 44 00 r 11 4110 .4 4.C64 914 402 410 0400 04100 N0 0/x MIK.. 001 K 4'1.000 NUN KM cr. 006.11.0614 4441 01419 x040400010006940010040 46199 tO 0.0 11110 NOW 0 (40014. 010100. 0010 401054 320 9004000 4 M 0401 Of 4.4010.30.196.4 COW 00424 1 1496 44 004 0 x 000.000 001 0011 11 40 446 01000 1040 GENERAL NOTES 14 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULES 13 MATERIAL. AND COLOR SCHEDULE 1 11 1 TM -30 � CUMLYI JPA POLE N0. 1993271/ CCI 31104ECt MJ. SCA -007 SATE 2 /9/11 INSVirrioN ORSP 6SUE 00E. 10611)41 651.0 13A7E (02 191045 •19191160 42 1351 POMONA RD A11t0 100 0010110 CA 92882 OFI CE': (909) 788 -2170 2., (900; 992 - 3113 J O M aximize C orfu \ • 0 Group. Inc. I !'� CROWN 160 411`010 53739(0 3x19.641919 8409 10.406 517E N0: TM -30 511E 604E k 10006551 IFIIICtIA REWORK N00( 50 sow imam ■11.9 0029) T(SEWIA 00 92592 E . FlexWove Pdsm r ..rr 1.r .. rrr Ilddliave Prism EsEESEE Wow wr r. liw FLEX WAVE PRISM 3 Pecessodss General MMDHA19bn Multi-band Panel •1 N.1' Duel Po9 , 9t0n 1 H111110ow•* Balm Width Y' AOlusl Electrical Demf191 7rW 1 wm.swwr w..Y00V1 ..•Olw..u.. was nYr. r -Now• Uit - =1= • 1{R1H•IIR RRflI1UR �rrn,..^..r•r ^rrr �rrrr�. .a � rte. �.•� r��rr. KATHREIN ANTENNA 742 -215 2 KATHRIEN ANTENNA 742 - 223 KFITHREIR •CALA DIVISION • ; =A . : • ik 14UTHRE111 OCALA DIVISION - mss.: ...• • . 9 1127(6 16' 11YR.MN M.i. lMMM\ 811696j61.1 Cu9.n • 712723 .A• 1.v11.r.11Nn•.ulA6t..0 .HI Yi•a1.A (.66th..* MC 1 4 � "• � t%1'T�' 11 TM -30 JPl POIF 110. 1993277E CCl PR07ECt N0. SCA -007 DA1C 219/11 6ESCR,11OL DRSP CIRREN1 ■SSUC 9510 (02/09/11) MANS PREPARED 17 . • 1 Maximize Comm � G Inc 1 351 POVON5 SLIDE 100 00Y'CE: 00941. CA 92862 OE (909) 786 -2170 FM) (909) 999 - 311 C/A NI 01?(?11/• 766 CARPEL() STREIT S (1E. kA . 98109 IW Cllr �. TM -30 517E NAME a ADORESS: DECO NE1Wgn( NODE 30 cimelele MY* En ammo 1EUECUL■ CA 92592 E 91001 DILL INTACTIZ ` l.ITYJd o 9194 87. ECAED Br: 45707.70 Br uF S C EY 47 7 REVISoN T3 1 FULL BUILD PHOTOSIM 1 _ro.. 4 VICINITYMAP 3 SITE PHOTO - VIEW 2 APPROXIMATELY 80' FROM NODE SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 APPROXIMATELY 90' FROM NODE 'TM -3O JPA 0 N0. 1993271E CC a0710 NO SCA-007 DAIS 2/9/11 0E5CWPRON OR50 CWRENt C68 0EN7 1550E OAi[ (02/09/11 PLANS MOANED BY Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. 1351 POMONA R0 SLUR 100 CORONA, CA 92892 CfMICE: (909) 796 -2170 FAX: (909) 992 -3113 0450. WOE CATC 1 CROWN 7 68 CARFIELD 5TREE1 SEATTLE. WA 98109 nn.ao.ncOSlie.Bowl SITE NO: TM -30 SITE NAME & ADDRESS: TEIIECUTA If1WORK NODE 30 7r =ass co IW, 111 off_ Imo RMECI*A CA 92592 ( SOW TOM ewsma Sir I ron AWN RR CNED Rh. 17917:819 9L'. NF 5C EL .51!881 87A18E1t RENm017. P 1 . K 04 570) IOW. Cr ~WOO 61615 PPU5 b 116X16411 00.54 ON 156 KANS MAC W tl1 SOODeoC /61.55551 (551/4 511OV9..469 . 50 0•5517011 R 55586 WNU 96 016 1581 5 05 0555 t86500. 566 1081. A( 001115861 9.545 5 5558 041 P558050560 50 WANKS 50 55501801 515 675515 1199 5g605C 000( 705 9016 ON 501 O. NCO. 170 1 0854011 N 50515 W011 (45500.5. 0:010.161 15W1 0.014 700 161 400 0650 04) 45 061155 8555559 115706 105435554700 7Oi rc/ (9 rp DIAL 7011 THEE I- 800 -217 -2600 Y Y4 MC Yn 104810 PO .0810. 4.011 Of ILIMOS tale••■ (C) SCE 455551 5500)067! 1 1 1 I 1 0 ) 09 00 (E) 0Nr1ER ----- S„O 5 / i NEIEN PEDESTAL 111115 I'- 4 -6 CONCRETE PAD CRA.TESI WEAL 4 0,557 7 ��_ _p a WAC _ _ (� UTM15TY TRENCH ' •TREES REM0YE0 FOR CINBTY ENLARGED SITE PLAN ft 1 0 ,K / ■ 154000 FENCE • \ TM -30 (E) 504M UIUtt POIE POLE/ 1991098E 11 -Mr:, 51154 P10P0115 I I 555599. 1 0 f O• 6`. / NOR TH 30861 (754 56511E AK.. SITE PLAN TM - 3O JYA POI2 80 19932778 00 PROJECT NO SCA-007 DATE 2 / 0(0894OIION DRS!. J CuRKN1 1550 DAIL CURRIN) 15SUE DATE. ( P4A45 PREPARE() OY: ( •" 1 Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. 1391 7050NA RD SUITE 100 CORONA. CA 92582 OFFICE: (909) 786 -2170 FAX: (909) 997 -3113 CROWN 768 CAREIEL0 SIRELT �TTLE. 08109 8011555.800+ 551E NO 978 NAME k AD0RE55: MECUM CM NUDE 30 1540a 1055 06015 51 59 5 75510007 10462005 CA 92592 (suEEt RILE: FLAN 1110101 9Y! SNECT 14.0(9 A TM -30 CHECKED BY SC 1 558520 0Y EM 1 A / MOE Iwa 3 6 2 v4M1w M4004 1U -!IX N AI .A1(PO. MIOw 1.2.122 .47 M' ' EXISTING 80' CUSS 2 W000 POLE ROLE / 1093217F b rn 1 i[c. Qm3 NEW CONOR153N8 SEE EQUIPMENT AREA 3 04 • sr-':".T44 4444 rtmU. MIA KW 0 CNNL 0.0) EAST ELEVATION MOM 044101.121.100:13 100110 I GOOK OSX11 SS OM Ns B WP !:! ...PP An g 94-- .17"" A NEW CONO1110N8 EQUIPMENT AREA SEE —ant nt • 80' :CLASS 2 8000 POLE POLE / 1993272E NORTH ELEVATION CROWN CABTLE MPREAEADY 1 *ISTALL 8 DL9 WOOD CROSS ARM AT 36' -0' 8.0A. 70 BC PAMIE0 BROWN 2. ATTACH (3) PANEL ANT (NAT(02N 742 215) TO 8E PA41(D BROWN. 3.0(SIALL CROWN CSSLE RAAIOS MIN 4' OFF OF POLE (USING UPSTARTS) AT 3.00 POSITION TO BE PUNTED BROWN. 4 INSTALL DISCONNECT SWOCN IAN 4' OFF OF POLE (175R/C UNISTRUTS) AT 3:00 POSITION. (SEE DETAR SHEETS) 10 8E PUNTED BROWM 5.84STALL CROWN CASTLE 4' COAX RISER SCR 40 AT 2:00 MUM. 70 OE PANTED BROWN. 6. CROWN CASTLE CONTRACTOR TO MARS( ER GN TO REPLACEMENT POLE 7. CROWN CASTLE TO P.T 0 OLD POLE MAKE -READY NOTES (1) POWER LNES 4 COAX SCR. 40 C CONDUIT J P7 MD SPAC.t SCE 1' CROW] FOC/EP 0.00.1100•I1 (E) TRANSMISSION LINES NOT USED 1 13 4' COAX SCR. 40 WC CONDUIT NOT USED 6' SPACER PROPOSED EOWPMENT. 4' COAX ������• SOLE 40 SCE 3v3; CONOCO 1 GROUND Wel MA 1- 2 CLANT SP.L' _ EQUIP. SPACE PLAN VIEW I 1 ) 1 061E 2/9 ORS* CURRE Cu0.1T. .EPA P0.£ N0. 1993217E SCA-007 ISSUE CURRENT 1SSIIC LAIC (02/09/11) PLANS. PREPARED 84: o � 1 M G axlm ro up izeComm. t nc. 1353 POTIOIA RD SUITE 7U0 CORONA (6 92482 OFFICE: (909) 786 -2370 FAX: (909) 992 -3(33 G/ C RIQyNN 7 68 GARFIELD STREET SEATTLE, WA 98109 .010N(CO2114 400, ISITE NO: TM — 30 SITE LAME & ADDRESS: TENECUTA NEWARK 1 ( 30 OA 1I 80103Ht / =(40B 3EMCCULA CA 92592 E .. MICA:5 8 k17Ek (r1741) 0F 8(. E20ED 8Yo NF SC 5!3221 FAO/BM A2 1 n n M +4 ' Q i4Wna COI `WEST ELEVATION NEW CONDITIONS "Tent 0 COSTING POLE 0 1993277E 6 11 �MLI�M dUV/.5 RIQ 10I 7:1'...1:`" 4- apiylppl�r,vl I�rs 1180 IAN 4 9H -■ SOUTH ELEVATION NEW CONOTONS N I I I I EQUIPMENT SEE E CROTNN CASTLE MAKE-READY 1, INS7ALL 8 018 W000 CROSS P89 AT 36• -0" 1. —3 IKOA. 10 OE 1849700 BROWN 2 ATTACH (3) PAVES ANT (NANKIN 142 715) TO 10. MOM PAINTE0 BROWN- AA PEAL 1 3. INSTALL CROWN CASTEL RA0402 IAN 4' OFF OF POLE (05510 0842 WT5) At 3.00 P02171014 10 BE PAINTER BROWN. 4 INSTALL DISCONNECT SWi7C11 1444 4' OFF CF POLE (u$84C UNIS1R075) AT 100 POSTION. (SEE OE744 RIMS) TO BE PAINTED BROWN, 5 INSTALL CRONIN CASTLE 4' COAx RISER 5CH 40 AT 2.00 POSITPON 10 OE PM47E0 9ROWTI. 6 16O4474 CASTLE CONTRACTOR TO IRANSIER CAIY TO REPIAaMENT POLL /. CROWN CAME TO P.717 OLD POLE MAKE -READY NOTES 4' COAx 5011. 40 PVC CONHAI e. 081 W000 NOW FOR AMENDS 4' COAX SCH. 40 P.^C C060011 SCE. GROUND NOT USED PROPOSED EQUIPMENT. NOT USED (E) POWER LINES woow KAAM 6' SPACER 4' coot SCH. 40 SCE PVC CONDUIT 1 GROUND (E) 1AANSMIS.y4O.V UNE`S UT) SPACE. SCE I' GROUND FOC /EP EOCAP 4 NOT USED ! i 3 SPACE 1 1 2 7X018 SPACE GATE 7/9/11 OE OR5P J CURNEN7 CLENT ca PROJECT 840 SCA -007 10511E OA70 CURRENT ISSUE DATE PEAK PREPARED 810, � Maximize Comm. W Group, Inc. 1351 POMONA RD SUIR 100 CORONA CA 92682 OTFICE• (909) 786. -2170 FAX: (909) 992 -3113 7 68 CAROD SOD SEATTLE. WA 58109 e. cro•ncoNa.FAm 900 745.• TM — 30 SITE MUC t ADORESS TEMECULA Nfl*0RK NODE 30 fM! IOSE N 44081 NW 11■1/014 CA 92592 O SECT TITLE E:EVATIONS 5 R15 WAL IT CKED 8Y: 1880100 CNN SC W 91 17 Pf.V490t4; A3 1 J MOUNTING PLATE DETAIL PIPE ATTACHMENT DETAIL NOTICE 1 . 7 . reg i . , ,,a12:Lp17111,ALICIa.1241d4L DBL ARM ATTACHMENT DETAILS 1 1 rr 3 w. =MN* ..•r ...r. r... 12 \REQUIRED GO95 SIGNAGE jr 11 maNI ANTENNA ATTACHMENT w=14•31 e-- eue.ea EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION ' 9 -e - -e ..111 9 IT1P VIEW Ma -31126 SIDE VIEW S -3 -CPUSE-L -N SPUTTER SPUTTER ? ;e TOP VIFW NOT USED STAND OFF BRACKET C;!. FRONT VICW SIDE VIEW ANTENNA SIDE BY SIDE MOUNTING BRACKET i FfiwiT DISCONNECT ? a MAO r SQUARE 0 CuT -OFF SWITCH 1861 aseulor TRI BAND FLEX WAVE RADIO T� M A-nt KATHREIN ANTENNA 742-223 l 000 5 KATHREIN ANTENNA 742 -215 .H ..r TM - 3 19 0 .rA .QE IA 199321 ca PROJFCY NO. SCA -007 3 Y 2 r � DATE 2/9/11 DESC I .Da 9757 CURALNt ISSUE 0549 02/09/11 PLANS PRFPANIO 01. � Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. 1 351 P01100A RO S UITE 100 1000.X CA 92882 OFRCE• (909) 786• -2170 FAX. (909) 992 -3113 CUENT 7 86 OAR11E50 STREET 9 FAnti. WA 98109 . w. crown OMtCO n 911E 99.1 TM -30 SRRL TARE d AOORISfi MEW HEROIN WOE 30 SOU MPMaINC; O IOW) 405159116 CA 92592 ( SKIT II41L' EOLFMENf ITIAL5 .PAYIV 8Y: 24401((0 di: 1r. SC �EI NurA APPLICANT li\CNOWN v CAS1LE TM -42 NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE NORTHWEST SIDE OF MARGARITA RD. 370' WEST OF AVENIDA BARCA TEMECULA, CA 92592 CALM cent 1120.10 1. SCAN MIN 020•41: MCRd CMOS 8101E (.K2)331-0200 JURISDICTION Oh a 1f1ECt*A 1 1200 0. 03 * R1d 03 904 ( 1) 1125. -9021 « 0011�uw -0.12 1,. N ENGINEERING FIRM/SURVEYING CODE COMPLIANCE: ▪ .....q. Saw. n. Ali (0 Int N O 3000000 OF SJR '00 0E 1(9019 COLS AS 000000 K IOC.. •034110 COo.. a Dram AMIOIIKS .0 1.00MJPSKQ•121 01* 8: 008(103 INK 19200. wk. •••-.12 -w0s 1 MCA CAJ WA IL/testa 1001 910 Kt 312 COORDINATES W : 10.51341 109 • 112..0120 CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS .0.144w9Ce Mod 5Mm1(• 4.102 4114.1442 SCION 9409 now, (011 N5•0570 Ralf. (915) 7.47. Cady .0L001 wars, 19x1 vD -910 9-01 3 NHa 11X- ( 207-181 200: 0121, 1'M' v 1500 Rnc: (0 w -Im O. 1.41010 10304 Oia 75. 3151 01 • 12E 0 0 M iro . i. l rous ml •C r.. i :t= r 4 r N O �a. li nt i r1.0 7 ,2 Kat Power, r uing =NW 9, A t 231 10118 SOW 00,7 U 1 . I r 1 n O. 03 a. S(C101 00777 C 1 O RY r 0 1 0 . SS MONO WOO. .1 1 O i 13 r. .1• 9D MSS 1 w1Z/ 1 1 7 n. rs l' 4R/DACO4tGt it r. r no 36 5101 5000 wA1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DATA TABLE AIMS* mrNt1 warn mom 2001 10013 o or 1 TT 19.4. 01•00.0 0001 WAS 111+191 005011. woe 18S/1nO5ma INa 16E 1910015 ANA MM. re MP 882 Ra9i 1118 1005 ROC* NEON rro O.Mwry W990.001 wK OI 0 0 0 511301 01 mr7/011 rum MOM WS /WC 5 0 0 11 1009 813 MO ITN (03 00 POT T1 T2 T3 P1 Al A2 A3 VICINITY MAP NOM MICR or r. 1orefrm 1M g0C 9 950813 R 320 16T 9 MOOS 201 1/0 PIG 10.19 of Rat: 1100 90 ae M/A on 3/4 NA MA 07/4 N01C•CI5 SMUT .0.1 W 1 on AWNS 644010 • J5Y'302111101r 91017* Nat SHEET INDEX 88 not gas 50155a lido w 100nc0O1 Illll1rn111 91050.011 SR warm 071 RAM (TM-42 l "'. �t II 5)0007 11070 IQ! CO 800(007 NO SCA -007 DATE 2/9/11 4/4/11 DESCRIPTION ORSP REVISO9 PER 0101 (=REH15 NMI 411 t0.! 0011 cN180M 15531E 0015- (ooi i 07.10: 00 at: r r 1 Max lmlze Comm 105 Group, Inc. 1 351 704083 M0V) S LATE 100 CORONA, CA 92882 %Ira: (909) (86 - 2120 F AX: (909) 992 0131711 (6B GAR)5ELD STRIAI SEATTLE, WA 98100 M 0rO.1000>12414m CROWN ,f 1011 TM -47 M E 04401E & 30ORE55: EEO NETWORK NODE 42 00BR'aimanRama tears 7(41000105 CA 02592 5 - 15(1 MILE: C .1 01': 50(50 81 A°9P - r 00 R': C T C SC EL 18000;8 04 1909 I T1 2 A TEMSN4 CAME SCHEME 4.11 OM 1474 artm MD / 01 V+a mat PO ONtE la Vat 0.A4 0 uf•.r1 MO ran SM -0 0 3/3 IWO 111 IM 1b 100 it t 0 ,jr am (4 e N -.' 2 21/2 sh s.w•tlst mt m. 40.1•0..lem 0 • 0 YE. *3310 100104 *413• 240 Mat WM 06 eV an. MO CO. 003M1 104 O¢N4 0.1 IAA 10 4011x0 - - - COMM 13401 VIE �- -- •4u Sala - - - - 010.90060.110 - t - MEMO( Mara 4- O4 300 01041 -- 403 _ 14.12.. CARL. - -OVA 4*4a.0tt VC - MM.?"' - (R - -- MAU - E Over A 1 LEGEND 14 1 K 01104 SAL OE 31001!09112 •340 MICA 00060051.0 011170 0 01116 6 061107 W 10.1 Y. 010/C M lorstel CM MOM. 10.70 00. 0 an 01.1002 1100041 101/11201 >wt 4710.2 mutes it// me MAIM • ma 10 01 0200 A AMT. 6 MOW., au It na 0 ROAM 1 N 1011201190 AMMO M t Weer IOM. Sd1A MS 6 N Mama is IM MO A M *0 /117000 0041 M0 34015 lot 0 11wr M 1 Va O a4m It umtw 14x010•0tam 40.31 AU I- 0.020- 431MON a 0 1 COMM as 16 4041 Mt 41t 060/00000 Al VONNU0 1 a Lan 41ALE 000• OA Wan MOO N 091 a 01144416U60 YO 0 MOM 4109r R. 0100000 OrM•ea 1EL COWL 02 70 at Dot 0109 001. 40 trot awe C9400 01140. t 4 Dam D1L110 0 010 041t. 34004 943 e0.014 1061101110aw 0.1110 410p10N0Rtl1 34110 40100. 0001 OS 1•00741 1*0*44t7 6 MAO 10.2.10¢04tlR10 1 .0 1907 r 40110E +K 0 x 00[00. d n< OAK. 22.0 O n< moos imam 0000 00 M. K A or AL Or PIE tln an 0 09 A O S W0 Mat 01020 i1 x 4 J 00 6@ CO MOO ap x 21011x11 10 A . M.... 016E Aar a .,1711M•tO T x 06 • .1714 MM. E0 Mle e0 •nYMa 70107 re tEUrwao x . to .t.172 ar0 0110w.• 17.0430.1 Rea IWO to 470 eV1 am• . MF Mon 0. m. 1 • 04011 -71410011 • 1177.0.0 . 01.0 .0 03 ... Du1 *107 O 033* 0140.7004 It On 70.. 114.3 Mei 1772 71727. 9w. 049 • al MC.1 0 , 4( 1 a00. M se Mama. 544E a war OaAW ra d . (. /.) 1411 d M 400040 MIIC.L 2001 x 1010 0 RL M. NO IA u.. 00.1 N 077.107..0. 10 a t f NO .0. o 01MEW 100.E •Y NO to . 044 0. 102001. mom a .7.110 Or "• aawwo nw:E0.. 1' .w 40x. lwwn MI C0 MM. MM.. M O6 Iw�4 M 1< 0000+012 •1. .w 1070 01160 Mot . Nn 973 123Y2.1 0 ww< 0 E4033 .0004 0406 (56 00 3044 • Nr 00010 Shat 1104E 024001.041044( 004.700 212-0. 72 . raola 80t O0 w 1St 00001111 1. 0 x Opp 210 90..[11 COMM ON 0•071131. a 11 0110 0 x 27. 8.67.2 1037 1721 n< r0Q0 207 Co6lt.01 x0401 a MM./ a 71011011E MOW RINtel1 Man 0061 a M 7000 021E MA 40 MOW11 LOOM a a 1010 00[5 x.13. 0. 0 MOM. • .•00102.19) 0 r 1 M M1 Man 1 fob 2.2274 O M0 r 10 et 9111010.* or 1< OC410ttarant 7'J. 0 1114 1 et .4100.4 O as 0134104 10 Nan e< 1100 Cr 0010 MO .1504 2041 011047 Marla 4 mMe* w M0•1a Own m00 04 al 1740 00 700 as 000 oro .0 1 I S 011 94. 0 7 & 1449 in 110 Q10409 41 10000 YY00f011 00030 404 961 401 to ..8x[31 r011 x04101 f0t1 Wt. N 7175 IAA MI 733 13..3 x x.11 OF M Mara it 01 a 3402. 7000 sa<a004 6 004 0141 a 000 mN oaaa OO Rot n o*tr OO 04034 + 11122.1.10... KG0Ea09 Mtn r am 1 0.1 1u Ea CO x1100001 K Ma MR mole 4411[ 4 0161 o+maq • NS 0 «1 I uan A atm 0 040106 a< Moan N ma<V M S RI * wt0 a• ma 7140 0101 DaMaaM. 44180x114 MI 21 40615 20 Y M Max Oa O 101 Am 3 ALM• UMW, w•K 04aK 060 AMA L 110 10 4 1004 6 r 010070 E a K MAN Q 0010107044 mama la Oa MIA r aaww 00111400 WM la Rae 136 10110140 MOM 0 4100aa 440 S R4 OMMI Cana 10N EMS 20030 001411 M Pt 111010 10Y0O610 00 04101' 6 O0N O 4400 040 a ma 0 .m4iw S.01wa0M• 1034 1 4001040 ODA 003<a 0061050010 O 11000!0244 omit 0• WM 0 MEM( MOM. NO 002112 14 40. N 010x0011• Me MW6 (0104[4MDa 3< ONE 041 O4 01Mt OREM• Ma, 00M 0t @OOtari N 04 1 M OO MM 600010 MM K 0M56101 a 00 1I as or 1 Crt .OS S. 19!10006014. a 201 FWl • KLet WAN a 0K Sat WON K COMM 0)06 K Mae 0 M MOW= AMID 1 K 040 0010 4 OOOR 700® 1000004 Vale 0 MM A K 000000 0 4 04 t a 001[10ast0 4 00 700 0046 4e Ma 4 I4101E MOW r Main u4 4600 Q 400.. 01009E Emea 9 Gc max Dotal( Alba 9•1 11U140 MOON 11 4 K NN K M. 0010 a E 0101143 11 0.1 1041 AM, 0 SKS MI 01 111 00114 0 IMAM 064 4 010 0 N 701 1.11 1341MMD MAO Mart le OA 00• N Mt. 90 Am 009 WOO. K0100 a7l mama 41033 4103}06 Sir 00/1022/ Nab ax W 20• 0 .1.1 MAIM M. *3 0 0011100 101 461 00111 110007 K OR Mar 0 .176 WO 06001112 Oa. wn Saga • 4 MAI 022.10101 Pa M COMM. 0 •461441 WW1 r 040106 x(4000 40 03 9034 0 40 1111 a 431 0010 1 at 0001110. Matt M 40 4 0100 1101 71.0131110.3 Er MEM Oa IL 01000 K 019 alma • 110 1100 1102 0 0• Kat INE Malta au S4 =Pa. al Mat 21013 • MAIM Oa 1 0116) A •0a1 an 070 11001 .AMA 110 0 647x0 mama 013(4004 704 0040 904 01 MYIYO Wham AO 004 WM M06 MPt4M 40 tl LMALMO D IO111O0 D 0/43 a 4e m ILEOL•1 x01 Q LeMot Q ant MEM • 47026041 a 9M mm tow at 020m as Am ram mom 0 000091 1•01 matt 143IA016 NMOMS4 MAMIE( 0001110 N IMM O90a01 Napa AO Mara 0044E.IOAI1 *N4 11033 alai 1x00 17841041 000 H 446 K 10 0000Malt MAO OW00 DIAL 701. ERE[ 1 -800- 277 -2600 La m» 10.4YN t.• 11.0 mom taloa 16•0 001070101 MOM 14 0 Mav 6111 IM*BI1 941 HOMO K 01104 O OMIT MO • MONO AM a1MEta7 EP K M. Man 03u 10 Ya 043110• Dal 1 masa 00 Ott MOO 0111' 00 It Sal MIA 440 7111 K MINCIS so as 4 O NO 0 a M00 MOO 00 K all M Oat 01914.• 210 MOM OeS 44 0 9 ET at f Wane lootaa 0•100 Wait t OM a on 0344 MD K MOM%OA CAM I(100a411 IOWA! 10 WAY Q al e•Y00104 MEMO 0 9x1 000 114 M 0 00170 Mat 5 4 0100 at Will 014 as OM 00 SKIN 4 180 110 030 ORMe0 00. Mao 1 N MUM Sal ba L Mao ea 0601 NM 2 6*314 *010116090*1710 9041 40 M 4014001 K••1 sea u MOOS. 0245 143 0 await a Si Y Maar Mara 0 MEM MO 01601070 a MOM * 3 0 1 C 0 34 MI I0401000 MOM tl 010. I ant.0 0 4 On Cl 11540 EOM1 Mar $0104 sa Me 0 t at COMM I. W. OMR 1121727161.1 K 1004 VOW 41 u4 100oM 0 0 1004!01( 111. W 2110 01 Malta Oa a EMMA M as 01 MEW, Mama +ACM Mt WPM MO as as gams 9436 arm alma mm 1 42011x004016 Kola AMU Ma N MSM 01000 101■ 1.0150.10 am 4140/111/10 0•10.101 Ma MOMS NLL a Mt ON 4340■00 tl 4 170• OOOa 1 04 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 49 8 0 00 3 11 40 11 3< 9 41 0 34 Mar.Otl Od N•atN 11 St 0a O 1 S1 Mara mm we UM a■ A Am e K 11 01 60 sat N M O 00.100107 Ott 0. 0404 0106 39 349• 0 S4204130 1K COMM 0 4050 01 08 0034 6011• MOM 1421•01. 11 N COMM 9214 1070 10 OM Watt 0i AMU N A 011 Peal 04 Mak COMMA 01130 MOR 0000a014110011•00 M 4t 0 ®a MV 00.000311 K ALMA 0106011 0411E N 02081640Dd1501600910 601 M OM MOO MM.. rtMa. GENERAL NOTES 1 ▪ 0111001/41*4447110. 1 SWUM 09-990 our T Ott 1 Cp 911. 1 w 0000E a V •d2t 0211.., i vs MGfM. NO 016 0440• 010 o M O M S 010 ( 00111 221 -0 ▪ dot 107 1 10 bC 01 0 adl 100 0 104 ) w I7 Atlp� 040107. 00rOro0C89 ▪ 70 7•••112 MOMES 143 OMMICl N CON COMM dux 0.•44 Ma Al Pa 1 00900.0001 all art Omar M u19e94N fa 1 car., ? r r am0 r COON 0 0 Gat d Sat 9401.077/2[ • MM0107• Mt IV ./S•M4' 9 331 00110 wi 000.11MS 34r0 r 11 MM N 109 Cr MO 77 ■1 4000 ti 1 am roam 440 Kamm 804 3/* mu Mt 21611101.111312289.20111 7. 131.0 Y• wow. 000 70• 70011 t MM WPC 101.1 7 .701 61093 rob r cortMO 71 0 KAMA 1 rum .IMO WC w 0040 11 COMA 0009800 Pa Ew6K 1707 Nat 000 . ata Mee r • ma a m a la 1 bt00*0 000034 1 +N YOM 10wN01a Ala IMO L 9130 015 0 0 011x0 MI MOM maim 20 e0 s 4 S .400170aa N 67® atcor O Ma 901 Or+110401 • 04 TOME MOMS. K 0010E IMO. as au Mat, manors ma M 907 ra0. 011711 tom et 00 1 eta a u 10[14 m all VW 0121000 Wax 40 4700 =N 34 UM. MOM UM V 0 M O M OR Ma a 9 IWO M tT�-N -244 Ma • 0 a110 N700 tot. MIA 00 0114 re• 4 MOM O • aroma ta6a ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES 1211J51.122.191.7.-12291552110856X1 t O 6077 019100 10 NOM. 111110 1-7 2. 24 x 000 471 w MA ROY ■ x07411 ©34x0 0.0402 Tart O Wa. 040. 705 1700012 S WC100ME1 211' Loa Ma 0t PC1t 344x. • 5 3 DA 947 910 044 177 .43 04 444 IS 1471 OR.r x210(4 Er May a t 4 CO x Mai M.O. of .4 PO 1 010 t 1 � 14 ) 0 0 du CC two: Pa ' .7411 /w1 DM 0011 SOO Of MA 7. la 07449 al MA 04110.0. MM.. .0 qt 1434 halt a1.0.711111 10111170E ' Uh 0 t 4 MO 01 C.. • MOM 741 0 Yw *r 10 NOW 0O11 6.0190 1001 f ; ma Q a *a It wade • N SLOW 109000 10 401070 K 69.a walE 17e1 M Naar 1 �0 10e4 • K M1 1• 1,42105 • 723 7 1 011O( WWII aa0x010070471.i r 1004241 000600• N x1101.10 . 10110011 K a mow DIM R.0 MO 911111'. 1 AM Ma wa uacta109*0 Ist It 0n 1� MOM . 17 4 ,..,4 M 024 1.111.111111.• OEM* ea IMMIN M OP WE. 0 a16a110DILL11®D/ /1144 IMIIIK•w tr 13 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULES] 1} ( TM - 1 42 CO019 (1 5'.9711 4.241 PU41 CCI PR01EC1 30. SCA -007 OA T( 2/9/11 4/4/13 OESC1PT■0* ORSP 9041104 PER CRY COMMENTS CURREN 1550E OA1E• CURRE41 ISSUE DATE. C 04/04/ 11 EAA11S PREPA.OE5 8Y: [ORC. r Maximize Comm. � � Group, Inc. ,17.1 P000>U ROAD SIRE 100 NA CA 92562 E/47: (903) 786 -21)0 .1� (909) 092 -311) Co! NT CROWN 786 GAREIE1.0 5R7EE1 .70c W m 9 8 0m 7E NAME 41 ADO(FS5: IEYECUEA NEIN'QRK NCO[ 42 11131491•115111141511319 ND (ENEC01.A CA 92592 E 514(1 1111L• VOL NOIE5 g X:414.1.5 (341: TM -42 011EC9FO m: 5C. 10 MM T2 P WmWave' Prism FLEX WAVE PRISM a - •" - • FNaWave Prism ....... `.. ilKOLOOLI Cabe KUTHREIfl Pduniy NS ISM 5C ALA DIVISION Ne TANS.9I(11•1w.dAyanr .. L�' •f�T•- 1••• .,J.. Vit KRTHRE1fl SCALA DIVISION • ft. r '•fC � . a • >n u.11•.,ANe p1 13 KATHREIN ANTENNA 840 -10525 P•01.1141) 011110625 0.•' IA•trd IA u•••■1 NA••u I • .4. •••••• r. I •.,1v • • 1••• Z. ..�.': : •mo . ....•■•■ KEITHREIfl SCALA 010151011 . ..a...: .: C . . kiZ KUTHREIA SCALA 010151011 KATHRIEN ANTENNA 800 -10270 �rf.Y 120 1.... fee NNW, 800 10210 ( C011CRnE STRE 110140 PIXE CO PROJECT 110. SCA-007 RLV 1 2 MIL 2/9/11 ORSP 4/4/11 CURRENT ISSUE 041E CIRRENT ISSUE GTE_ ( o/ o 4/1 i PLAN• PREPARED IR OAP Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. 1 151 PO410444 ROAD SUITE 100 CORONA CA 92802 OFnCE: (909) 786 -2170 F AX. (909) 992 -1111 CL(NT• 766 OARNE4D 59REET SEATTLE. 916 98109 w..cr0.n00a111.00m /SIT5 440.1 TM — 42 SIIC NAUC a ADDRESS: OESCOFIION 8095106 PER 00470061410415 IEYECUA NEIIMORK NODE 42 1 ®9E V11011111 A'B 9 KUNO TENECULA CA 92592 ( 511001 ■11.L• 4s.cfPCilft 9CIFICKIO) pAVa 6Y: E01ED tM: VC 1 5C 41EET NNW: T3 FULL BUILD PHOTOSIM 4 VICINITY MAP LIVEil 3 SITE PHOTO - VIEW 2 APPROXIMATELY 70' F OM NODE SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 APPROXIMATELY 80' FROM NODE WON 2 "TM -42 C01FJKYE SIREET UCM PRE OG PROJECT NO SCA -007 N MTE 2 2/9/11 4 OESCIO9109 ORS. REN50N PER COY COwJEARS DREW Y tSSWE CuRRER/ MAX DAME ( 04/04/1 1) 91AUS PREPARED E9Y: • Maximize Comm � Group, Inc. FAN 13 91 POY1N 0 ROAD SU 100 CORONA. CA 92662 0Pi'ICE: (909) 296 -2170 . (909) 992-3113 DAM. CRQWN 766 CAREIEW SIREET SCRIBE. WA 98109 sm N0: TM -42 242 NAME & ADORES& TEMECRA WORK NODE 42 •wI SE amaIt 9YB 611.1191 TEMEC1 A CA 92692 ( 5I1E SUM Bit): E7051NO Po5 ( WW1 OY: 'CHECKED 62: VG SC RLY1 A,RVERp i E9 2 / 1411211/.11791•1:11i. Off 0)511)00 90 1.44009 Of 54000110.00 9140 9993 01 5195419415 000 d 1/4 No05 KIX 500.4 iff 2004.04 001194 900901 10044 140 (5944011 4 50,91 1191 540501541101 ON 1101 l01*1104 CC0199C101 WU 054 1 10.455011 10 180U 504119 0915 94550017 19019 9001 09 NOT flo .4009 10 fwd. Odd to HAIRS RIM 01044190 0191104990 51190. 11:000 00 NOT Mt IMMO 04) 41 174190 004045 Mid 4095,4010 1C.L. DAL MA Ent 1-1102-227-2023 sIMI MI NI •••• Am • am.= maw+ SITE PLAN WRAY TRENCH 24 nem KAND oat ••••• TCST WELL COntRErE 50 LICAT P01.1 (i 9 0465 euc -•-• 00 65 ' 141' (5.1 ‘\ ENLARGED SITEPLAN TM-42 ED • - 911.0.2-001 11 10.0 (02(0 4009000 Add] - - t sw. CURREN! 6507 011E .-••• (04/04/11) 017 NOR TH L IR:741 001 PROJECT 90. SCA-007 0410 2 /9/ 1 1 4/4/11 OESCAWTRA 0019 15.501 (1A1E: PONS PRITANID 09: Maxlmtze Comm. Group, Inc. 1351 901109A 501It 100 CORONA. C.A 97882 OMCE (909) 780-2)70 rAX. (90)) 992-3113 • tvr... 011(111, i (,,IRR‘, 18 " 760 0AR11910 STRUT SEATTLE. WA 98109 .1•K [ TM — 42 40 NAME 8 ADDRtSS: OM 2114119811161( 191 Men 11:7 WM (iCDC 4) / 0 0 4091 TEMECULA CA 92592 (SMELT mu: 'AT "1 r t 5 N HY .0,(.1: Pr VC SC SKTT 00189C0: Al NOME AST ELEVATION =V= MARGARITA RO 32' CONCRETE STREET UGHT POLE 0) ...E. M 11911 fOY .wr104 OA -1COq 1114. .ITS K 4444.c f4. W�Si' - 1' 9 f OI MIST4 40 vows O 090coma 941104111 11. 00 Top P NS1� O (gy v 011#W 1TEi �0 euna a 004:41.4 t fj Im00104 111 8000040 90AUtt fib. )-M.-.° I 2 SOUTH ELEVATION TM -42 «0 El6 51REE7 (.0217 FOIE CG 70019(07 No, SCA -007 2 DATE 2/9/ 4/4/11 DESORPTION ORSP REVISION PER CRY 00811(015 PIAVS PREPARED NG � 1 Maximize Comm. � Group. Inc. 1 351 POMONA ROAD SURE 10) CORONA. 06 92882 OFFICE: (909) 788 -2170 FAX: (909) 992 -3113 Mpg= WN [R9 68 ON7FlElD STREET TATE:E. NA 98109 AAA CtoOnCOrib.corn 111E W: TM -42 SITE 044PC k MORELS: IEIlECUU NEIWOR( NODE 42 IC1189 9/12119011191016(11318 IM MO (smut nu. b.E • /AT1O1.5 '7707. 00: Ch't(.7(2 OT. 05 SC S NEEI PAMPER A2 • NOTICE • \JAST ELEVATION kiiatri 2 NORTH ELEVATION 1 COW-WCW MEI] 0017 AXE CC4 PALACE NO SCA-007 OAR 2/9/11 4/4/11 DESCROMION REVISION PEN CRY COMMENTS CURRENT 855U( GMT ( 04/04/1 1 ) PREPARED ar ie Maximize Comm Group, Inc. 1351 POMONA ROAD SUITE 100 CDROM. CA 92882 OffICE: (ON) 488-2170 f AX: (109) 992 - 3113 •-....,..•... — — :-.... 788 CAR41a0 SIRES' SEAMS. WA 98109 Immtrolencestlesoto SITE NO.: TM-42 00t &WE & 0000E% 1111ECUIA NE1WORK WOE 42 imigurincompiogio... TEMECULA CA 92592 SNOT MIL eavArioN5 BC OPP ( N 90 ( RAIN ERNOT ft VC •.r: ro 51TEEE OWEN. 0(09109 A3 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0044, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL ANTENNA FACILITIES ON AN EXISTING JOINT USE WOOD UTILITY POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -15) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF- WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 600' EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 17, 2010, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0044, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 4, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0044 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0044, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on an existing wood utility pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0044, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on an existing wood utility pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 600' east of Margarita Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4 day of May 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4 day of May 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0044 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM- 15) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 600' east of Margarita Road Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: May 4, 2011 Expiration Date: May 4, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0045, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -21) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 340' EAST OF AVENIDA CIMA DEL SOL Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 17, 2010, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0045, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 4, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0045 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0045, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0045, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Margarita Road, approximately 340' east of Avenida Cima Del Sol, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4 day of May 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4 day of May 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0045 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -21) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Margarita Road, approximately 340' east of Avenida Cima Del Sol Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: May 4, 2011 Expiration Date: May 4, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0046, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -25) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOLANA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 145' WEST OF VIA LA VIDA Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 17, 2010, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0046, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 4, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0046 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0046, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0046, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 145' west of Via La Vida, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4 day of May 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4 day of May 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0046 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -25) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 145' west of Via La Vida Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: May 4, 2011 Expiration Date: May 4, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0047, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL ANTENNA FACILITIES ON AN EXISTING JOINT USE WOOD UTILITY POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -27) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF- WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOLANA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 200' EAST OF CENTERLINE OF MARGARITA ROAD Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 17, 2010, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0047, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 4, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0047 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0047, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on an existing wood utility pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0047, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on an existing wood utility pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 200' east of centerline of Margarita Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4 day of May 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4 day of May 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0047 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM- 27) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 200' east of centerline of Margarita Road Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: May 4, 2011 Expiration Date: May 4, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0049, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL ANTENNA FACILITIES ON AN EXISTING JOINT USE WOOD UTILITY POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -30) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF- WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE, APPROXIMATELY 525' EAST OF AVENIDA CENTENARIO Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 17, 2010, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0049, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 4, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0049 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0049, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on an existing wood utility pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0049, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on an existing wood utility pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Avenida Buena Suerte, approximately 575' east Avenida Centenario, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4 day of May 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4 day of May 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0049 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM- 30) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Avenida Buena Suerte, approximately 575' east of Avenida Centenario Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: May 4, 2011 Expiration Date: May 4, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0050, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -42) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF MARGARITA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 370' WEST OF AVENIDA BARCA Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 17, 2010, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0050, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 4, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0050 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0050, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0050, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the northwest side of Margarita Road, approximately 370' west of Avenida Barca, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4 day of May 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4 day of May 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0050 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -42) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the northwest side of Margarita Road, approximately 370' west of Avenida Barca Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: May 4, 2011 Expiration Date: May 4, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PW -7. Show intended location. Photo location contradicts plan location. City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT: NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project APPLICANT: Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle LOCATION: The Project includes the installation of 39 DAS nodes within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way, County of Riverside DESCRIPTION: NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (DAS) to provide wireless telecommunication services to multiple carriers. NewPath proposes to develop a 39 -node DAS throughout the publicly owned City right -of -way (see map on back side of this Notice). The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called "nodes." Each node consists of antenna rays constructed within or on a new slim line monopole camouflaged as a new street light, or located on an existing utility pole. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the Planning Commission intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the project design and /or the Mitigation Monitoring Program will be included as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project, which is available for review at City Hall. The Comment Period for this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is February 14, 2011 to March 15, 2011. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033. City Hall is located at 41000 Main Street. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through: The Local Newspaper [Posting the Site Notice to Adjacent Property Owners If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact Matthew D. Peters, AICP at (951) 694 -6408. Prepared by: '+n�h � �k550(.■ °C. (tAw -. (Signature) (Title) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Matthew D. Peters, AICP (951) 694 -6408 Project Location The Project includes the installation of a 39 -node wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way, County of Riverside (see attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan for locations) Project Sponsor's Name and Address Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath c/o Crown Castle USA Maximize Communications Group, Inc. 1351 Pomona Rd., Suite 110 Corona, CA 92882 NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle USA 1100 Dexter Ave., Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98109 General Plan Designation NA (Not Applicable) — all antennas will be located on new street lights or existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. NA (Not Applicable)— all antennas will be located on new street lights or existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right - of -way. Zoning Description of Project NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS ") to provide wireless telecommunication services. The proposed DAS network is a low profile system capable of delivering wireless telecommunications service to customers of multiple carriers such as AT &T, Verizon, Sprint, and MetroPCS. The proposed network initially will supply the infrastructure for NewPath's anchor tenant, MetroPCS. The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called, "nodes," which receive an optical signal from a central hub and distribute the signal in the form of Radio Frequency (RF) transmissions. For this Project, the hub is outside the City's boundaries (as are three other nodes, one in the County of Riverside and two in the City of Murrieta). Within the City of Temecula, the proposed network consists only of the antenna nodes. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of -way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 1 Each node consists either of antenna arrays constructed within or on a slim -line monopole designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right -of -way, or antenna arrays fixed to existing utility poles owned by the Joint Pole Committee ( "JPC "). Each facility generally features a 53.74 -inch Kathrein Tri- sector antenna within a flush- mounted housing (for new poles) or three Kathrein antennas mounted to existing JPC utility poles. Either configuration also will feature one or more Flex Wave Prisms or similar "fiber repeaters" mounted to either the new street light or the existing JPC utility pole. The fiber repeater converts digitalized spectrum received from the hub into RF signals emitted from the antenna array. Where the new node is proposed for an existing JPC pole, the facility also features a ground mounted meter pedestal. The Project involves the installation of both aerial fiber -optic cable on existing wood utility and newly installed street lights, and underground fiber -optic cable installed within newly installed and existing poly vinyl chloride (PVC) conduit in previously disturbed rights of way. The newly installed fiber -optic cable would connect 39 distributed antenna system nodes and ancillary optical conversion and power equipment also attached to the same utility poles within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way. Another three will be installed outside the City limits; two in the City of Murrieta and one in the County of Riverside. The entire network will be connected to a newly installed fiber -optic base station hub. Construction of the proposed DAS Project will consist specifically of the following: • Installation by NewPath of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed as street lights; • Installation of 39 DAS nodes each containing either: one (1) tri- sector pipe antenna, three (3) antennae insiode radomes, or between three (3) and six (6) panel antennas installed on the utility pole; • Installation of fiber -optic equipment (i.e. optical conversion equipment, signal regeneration equipment, switching equipment, etc...) mounted on existing wood and newly - installed street lights; • Installation of 4 -inch Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) conduit; • Aerial installation of fiber -optic cable onto existing or new wood and street lights; • Underground installation of fiber -optic cable into existing and newly installed conduit; • Underground connection of network to one (1) hub facility to be installed inside an existing public storage facility located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Rd.; • Installation of pull boxes and hand holes; and • Splicing of fiber -optic cable into facilities. The location of the proposed Project is illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan, and each location is further described on a corresponding and attached spreadsheet. Engineering drawings for a new street light and co- location on an G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 2 G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 3 existing utility are also attached. Construction is expected to last approximately 120 days and will consist of two (2) aerial crews and two (2) underground crews working simultaneously to complete construction of the proposed Project. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The Project proposes to develop a 39 -node DAS network throughout the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way adjacent to various commercial and residential zones Other public agencies whose approval is required None G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Noise Population and Housing Biological Resources Greenhouse Gas Emissions Public Services Recreation Cultural Resources Transportation and Traffic Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use and Planning Determination (To be completed by the None lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have be a significant effect in this case because revisions the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE a significant effect on the environment, there will not in the project have been made by or agreed to by DECLARATION will be prepared. a significant effect on the environment, and an I find that the proposed project MAY have ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, imposed upon the proposed project, nothin• further a significant effect on the environment, because all adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to including revisions or mitigation measures that are is required. Signature Printed Name Date For fd. In, a6ll G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 4 O` tD 0 t 0 0_ (1) 0 0 u 0 L t 0 O N m " C! Cu !D OD co O a) L CD w U U tD E O O U co a co co CD E 0 a) N 4- a) 0 0 cc co a) 0 O C E rD U 0 N a) (D CDD 0_ -C U C lD C` CD 0 a) -C 7 O CC CU 00 rD N a) 4- a) 7 m 0 CU Ul N tD CDD 0_ rD C U a) E a) F- 0 a) N -C 7 0 In C_ L U CO CC CD > 4-- 0 U U 0 t 0 m r-i Co C O CL ro t - aJ 0 a) 'O tft co a) L 0 z ci N m If N O1 ri O O O O r-i m H H H H H H H tD 0 CD t 0 U J U 0 m co .--I a (D tD 0_ 3 O m a) 3 O a)) c C 3 V) J U 0 z In 0 r-I ai C (D J a) CU N w rD co 0_ 3 O tD a) 2 -J U 0 T.0 rD' CO 0_ CU C ` U U-1 CD 0 CC C a) 0 -J U 0 lIi O O N (D O cc C 0 U r > D CO U U a J 0 CO w Lf) N �--I >- ID C a) J z ID 00 1 N cr 00 O O O L 4 c-1 N H H H H H H H CI) U C CD c w Co 0 J 0 10 I0 N tD O C_ co C tB z a) u (D CL V/ U iD a 0 CC -J U 0 CO '--I CC a) 00 CO -a a) 9- a) 4- 7 CO L w t 7 0 U a) OA CO I/) J U 0 w z 00 1.0 C 0 U z rD C.) 0 C7 0 a CD 3- J U 0 O UI tD 0 cC to U, 0 L L) C tD CC w a) v 0 0 0_ 0_ Q Q 0 0_ OD 00 4 4 C C 00 00 . 00 J J n ( J w w +-, a) 0) 0 0 a) In If) -C -C In 3 3 co ° a) a) z ¢ ¢ z fD 0 CC a) OD 4 I/) CU a) CO 4 4- 0 N U O N m fD C 0 CD U 0 -C U C tD CC 4- 0 to w CC CD L tD ao to 2 U 0 w 0 O a a) L U C 4- 0 N C O 00 CD a) rD U J U O I0 ID C C CC fD - J a) fD C a) cr rn O m In IO O O r1 L I - 1 c r1 H H H H H H H a) U (o L v I- T V) E O 4- 0 U (U O cc O L U C 0) S 0 0 V) v) z a) • L (O E O J (o 0 w ro 0 cc co 0 L U C ro cc 0 V) N a) 0 D_ n DO ,., 4-+ C L -C D .1 •U1 J J X a) a 0) v O V ) V ) L 3 3 0 Z Z O (r) 0) E U co -o c (1) 0 Li) O m 0 (o O cc ro • CO OD (0 VI Z 0 CC L (o On (U 0 in UC LC) 0 (U 0 CC CO C 0 (U U 0 L U C (o CL V1 Z 4- 4-+ L L D .DO • J J 4 +-, a) a) a) a) • N 3 3 CU a) Z Z CO O) O a--I N m N N N ct 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L L G L 2 L H L G F- F- H H H L DO a a) CM a) Z ro 0 J (0 > 0 n -C DD a a) 4- V) 0) Z CM (a (U O U (o C a a) U 0 w O T (o co (U C a) a) a) V) V) co C a) a) Cr) (U J VI a) 0 d DO C �--I 1 x L.1.1 0 L U 0 (0 0 4- f0 i DD U 0 Z O 0 N a (U (U C v a) V) CU -J V) w v 0 a 0 O O 0 a C 0 U U a) O L ID lD 0 m 0 O O O 7_ C a) 4- a) U (0 0 C a) V) (n 4- • OD J CI) a) CM a) Z 0 o O ( 0 0 4- C a) a D! T C a) io L a) C v l7 V) Z -C DD a 0) CM a) Z CC CI) a) t U C 0 w O V) 0 cc N O U z V1 V1 lD I■ Q) O r-I N N N N M M I I I I I I I L 2 ` 2 ` G L G 2 L H r L I— I H H 4 4 4- 4- _C ..0 _C C DD OD DO DO • J J J J ,• +, CV v (1) a) CI) a, a) L L 4- 4- 4- 4- N V) V) V) a ) v CD a) Z Z Z Z tY CO (o OD (U U 0 V) O ch L a) a) L U C V) Z cc a 4- a) U C V) ' - 4 L a) a) L U C V) Z a a) CM 0 a) N 0 W ID 00 CC NJ '-4 . (U O 0 V) (r) iD n oO m m m S I s I G 2 G 0 a) a) U a) V) a) L U C 4 ) O C cci O O O X 0 • CL CO n +� (o 4a 0.0 ro C & a) fU E V1 co Z a) 0 co U M _ m (o S I L Q O O O O O o cr Iri Ln a) on co O 0 X 0 Q (o C cc -o C 0 U DD C . X W C 0 NJ a) a) DD co 0 0 X 0 Q Q (U D C O DD a) C U U C a) H a) 0 0. 0 0 O 0 O of m 5 s O to 0 { 11' / , ) § ! j ■ / c P 1! E | - § k 2 | 1 ® $ I | "I ( t t 20 1041 ¢` $ h • k| { k i / / ts \ \ , E 0 0 / 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: See the attached maps and exhibits included in the Project description for more information on the location and design of the DAS nodes. 1.a.b: No Impact: As indicated in the General Plan (Figure CD -1), The Project and the location of the nodes will not have an effect on a scenic vista or substantially damage any scenic resources as they are all located in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way adjacent to commercial or residential areas. 1.c. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The installation of aerial cable on existing poles would further add to the number of cables attached to the poles. These would be attached near phone and cable TV cables and would incrementally add to the visual impact of these structures. This additional impact would constitute a less- than - significant impact due to the presence of other cables on the poles. However, the proposed Project includes the installation of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed to match existing street lights located throughout the City right -of -way and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. The street light design will help the antennas blend in with the surrounding environment. In some cases, street lights may not blend in a rural area where no street lights exist. In order to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area, the following mitigation is required to ensure a less than significant visual and aesthetic impact: Mitigation Measure A -1. New slim -line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street light pole to match existing street lights in the right -of -way. If a new street light is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim -line monopole with concrete street light base — minus the "cobra" light arm may be acceptable. In rural areas, where street lights don't exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete "street light" type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights 1.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance 655). Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Lighting issues are addressed during the City's plan review and inspection process. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 5 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X X b c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(8)? Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use X X d e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? X Comments: 2.a. No Impact: The project has been or would be located entirely within the existing publicly owned right - of -way along existing roadways and within generally urban and residentially developed areas. No portion of the project site or adjacent areas is considered to be Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. 2.b. No Impact: The project is located within a publicly owned right -of -way and is not zoned for agricultural use or under a Williamson Act Contract. 2.c.d.e. No Impact: The project is in a publicly owned right -of -way that is not used or zoned for agriculture, timberland or forest uses. There would be no conversion of land from forest or farmland since none exists. G: \PLANNING \2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 6 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated X X X X Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? b c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: Construction of the Project will consist of four (4) work crews (two [2] aerial crews and two [2] underground crew) who will work simultaneously until completion. Each work crew will install all described components of the Project as they progress along the Project alignment. A typical underground crew will consist of the following: 1 backhoe 1 HDD bore machine 3 standard pickup trucks 1 dump truck 2 hand -held vibratory compactors 1 saw cutter 1 crane The following labor crew will be required: 1 foreman, 2 operators, 3 laborers (including flagmen), and 1 inspector. A typical aerial cable placing crew will consist of the following equipment: 2 aerial cable - placing vehicles 1 cable reel trailer 1 supply and equipment truck 1 pickup truck A typical aerial crew will consist of an aerial cable - placing vehicle with a driver, an in- bucket operator and one or two flagmen, depending on traffic conditions. 3.a. -d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project does not include development of new homes or businesses and, therefore, would not induce population growth in the South Coast Air Basin. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 7 Emissions during construction would result in minimal emissions from occasional vehicle trips to maintain the project facilities. Short-term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction would be less than significant through the implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM), as well as the following mitigation: Mitigation Measures Air Quality 1: • Minimize land disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion • Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials. 3.e. Less Than Significant: The construction of the project could generate fumes from the operation of construction equipment and from asphalt paving, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposurtes would be short term and /or transient since they would occur during the construction phase only. Furhtermore, SCAQMD rules restrict VOC content (the source of odor - causing compounds) in asphalt and paints. The project would utilize typical construction techniques in compliance with SCAQMD rules. As such, project construction would not cause an odor nuisance, and odor impacts would be less than significant. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 8 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Comments: 4.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will be constructed within the publicly owned right -of -way, which consists of primarily paved surfaces with no riparian habitat or habitat for sensitive species, wetlands, vernal pools, or marshes. No tree removal is anticipated and no migratory routes or wildlife corridors have been identified. There may be a potential for indirect impact to habitat from construction runoff or release of hazardous substances from construction. However, these potential impacts are discussed under Section 8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and are reduced to level that is less than significant through the implementation of an existing Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SPCP). 4.e. -f. No Impact: The project would not result in tree removal or impacts to biological resources. The project site is not located within a habitat conservation area; therefore no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 9 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? X c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: 5.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is to be constructed in the publicly owned right - of -way, which has been previously disturbed by grading, roadway, and sidewalk construction. It is not likely that intact resources would still exist in most of the project area; however, there is a potential that resources could be present in less disturbed areas. As a result, the following standard note shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 10 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Comments: 6.a.i., ii., iii. Less Than Significant Impact: The Elsinore Fault traverses the City of Temecula and is located in an area of high seismic activity and faulting. In addition, the project area may be subject to severe ground shaking from a seismic event since the area also has high liquefaction potential. The project will be designed to comply with the City's seismic design standards for utilities, resulting in a less than significant impact. 6.a.iv. No impact: While the City of Temecula has rolling hills and areas of steep topography, the individual project sites for each node within the publicly owned right -of way are relatively flat and not prone to landslides. No impact would occur. 6.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The erosion hazard of the soils in most of the project area is slight. In addition, much of the area in the public right -of way where the nodes will be installed include turf. Erosion controls will be used where necessary along the proposed project route. The most likely situations for the use of controls will be when construction activities occur near storm drains and in landscaped areas where the slope of hillsides is steep. Control measures that may be used include silt fence, certified weed -free straw wattles and straw bales, and other control measures as necessary. Each node will require an encroachment permit to be issued by the Department of Public Works resulting in a less than significant impact. 6.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: As described above, the area is prone to liquefaction, and areas with expansive soils. The impact is considered less than significant as each node will be reviewed by the Department of Building and Safety for compliance with seismic design standards for utilities. G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 11 6.e. No Impact: Septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems are not a part of the project. No impact would occur. G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 12 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Comments: 7.a.b. No Impact: The proposed Project involves the installation of new concrete street light poles and new antennas on existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. The new and existing poles will not generate noise or greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, no impacts will occur. G:\PLANNING12010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 13 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Comments: 8.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activities have the potential to release three primary types of materials into the environment: petroleum based products used in construction equipment, bentonite slurry from boring operations, and runoff of silt -laden water from the construction site. To reduce the potential for release of these materials and to minimize the impacts associated with an inadvertent spill, NewPath will implement an existing Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SPCP). This plan will evaluate potential spoil scenarios, identify avoidance and prevention measures, and identify response actions to such situations in order to reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. 8.e. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The City's GIS mapping system identifies portions of the project area as being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. The project is subject to review and comment by the Riverside Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). The City of Temecula will require the project to be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to issuance of any permits. As previously provided for other projects in Airport Zones in the City of Temecula, the following standard mitigation measures will be required: G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 14 Mitigation Measure Haz 1: The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. 8.f. No Impact: The Project is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 8.g. Less Than Significant Impact: Access along project area roadways during construction is expected to be maintained so that residents living in the vicinity are not significantly impacted by the project. Due to the temporary nature of the project and the City's requirement for a Traffic Control Plan, the impacts would be less than significant. 8.h. Less Than Significant Impact: The project area is within an urbanized area and is not prone to wildfires. The impact is less than significant. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 15 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - site? Y. X d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f Require the preparation of a project- specific WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X • Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: Erosion controls as required by the City's Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be used where necessary along the proposed Project route. The most likely situation for use of these controls will be when construction activities occur near storm drains and in landscaped areas where the slope of hillsides is steep. Examples of control measures that may be used include silt fence, certified weed - free straw wattles an straw bales, and other control measures as necessary resulting in a less than significant impact. 9.b. No Impact: The project involves the installation of new street light poles and antennas in the public right -of -way. Groundwater will not be impacted. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 16 9.c.d. No Impact: The project would involve minor construction within the publicly owned right -of -way. The project will not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding. No alteration of the course of a stream or river would occur and no impact would occur. 9.e. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not be adding a significant amount of impervious area to the project area, since such facilities consist of a vertical pole and are constructed adjacent to previously paved areas. 9.f. No Impact: The project would not require the preparation of a WQMP. Thus, no impacts would occur. 9.g. No Impact: The project does not involve placement of housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map, because the project does not include any residential within those zones. No impact would occur. 9.h. No Impact: Any structures proposed to be placed within a 100 -year flood zone will be small and limited to poles, aboveground aerial cables, and underground cables. These will not impede or redirect flows. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 9.i. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, since this is a utility project in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. The impact is considered less than significant. 9.j. No Impact: No portion of the project is subjected to seiche, tsunami or mudlfow. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 17 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Physically divide an established community? Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X X b c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Comments: 10.a. No Impact: Installation of the DAS Network entirely within the City owned public right -of -way will not divide an established community. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 10.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The project has been reviewed by the City's Development Review Committee (DRC) for consistency with all applicable plans, policies and regulations, including the City's Telecommunications Ordinance, to ensure the project will have a less than significant impact. 10.c. No Impact: None of the Project components are located on lands covered by a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Therefore, no impacts would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 18 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Comments: 11.a.b. No Impact: According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the zoning classification of MRZ -3a has been applied by the State. MRZ -3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant economic value, based on available data. In addition, the proposed project is to be constructed in the publicly owned right -of -way, which has been previously disturbed by grading, roadway, and sidewalk construction that will not impact any mineral resources. Thus, no impact will occur. G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 19 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Comments: 12.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed Project will increase noise levels only during construction, and only between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday and 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Saturday (No Sundays) as required by City Ordinance 9.20.060.D. No increase in noise levels will occur from the operational phase of the Project because noise- producing equipment will not be part of the Project. The noise impacts associated with the proposed Project are expected to occur in the immediate vicinity of construction equipment. The increased noise levels will occur during mostly daylight hours, when average noise levels from vehicular traffic are generally the highest. In addition, the noise increase will not affect any one location for an extended period of time. The noise generated from construction activities would be short term in duration and considered less than significant. 12.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activity associated with the proposed project would not result in excessive ground -borne noise or perceptive vibration. Removal of pavement and drilling for new poles would create short term, low levels of ground -borne noise and vibrations. No high vibration producing activities such as pile driving, are proposed. Once construction is complete, the proposed project is not expected to generate vibration or noise. Therefore, impacts associated with construction- related noise and vibrations are considered less than significant. 12.c. No Impact: Once constructed, the DAS system does not produce noise, and therefore, would create no permanent increase in ambient noise levels. Therefore, no impact would occur. 12.d. Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in response (a) above, there would be a short term increase in noise levels during construction; however, due to the short duration and locations, the impacts are considered less than significant. G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 20 12.e. Less Than Significant Impact: This is not a residential or commercial development Project and the nodes are not staffed. Thus, the Project will not result in residents or employees being subjected to airport noise. No impacts will occur. 12.f. No Impact: The project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 21 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: 13.a. No Impact: The proposed project would not result in substantial population growth in the area because no new homes or businesses are proposed, and no infrastructure related to population growth is proposed. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 13.b. No Impact: No housing would be displaced by the proposed project and no impact would occur. 13.c. No Impact: The project would not displace people or housing, or require replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 22 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Comments: 14.a. No Impact: The project involves the installation of new concrete steel light poles or co- location of antenna facilities on an existing pole in the city owned public right -of -way. The project will not introduce any new fire hazards or generate population growth that would require an increase in fire or police protection services. The project would not result in an increase of population or housing in the project area. Therefore no new demand on local schools, parks or public facilities would occur. G: \PLANNING120101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 23 15. RECREATION. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 15.a. No Impact: The project would not result in an increase of population, which would increase the use of existing parks or other recreation facilities. Therefore. No impacts would occur. 15.b. No Impact: The proposed project does not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreation facilities. Therefore, no impacts would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 24 16. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? X b Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X X e Result in inadequate emergency access? f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Comments: 16.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would be constructed over time along roadways in the City of Temecula, ranging from major roadways to residential streets. It is expected that there will be short-term construction related impacts associated with the project. As a result, the Department of Public Works will require an encroachment permit, traffic control plan, and right -of way agreement to address the impacts and reduce them to a level of less than significant impact. 16.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Due to the low number of construction vehicles associated with two aerial crews and two underground work crews required by the proposed project, no changes in the level of service are anticipated. As mentioned above, short-term construction related impacts will be reduce to a level of less than significant through Public Works requirements for an encroachment permit, traffic control plan, and right -of way agreement. 16.c. No Impact: Construction and operational traffic associated with the proposed project is not expected to result in a change in air traffic patterns, including an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks given that the new steel light poles will be less than 40 feet high or the new antennas will be co- located on existing utility poles in the city owned public right -of -way. _16.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would result in trenching and laying of conduit, construction of new light poles, and aerial and underground installation of fiber optic cable, and installation of pull boxes and hand holes. This would result in potential lane closures, loss of access, and short-term traffic congestion. G:\PLANNING\20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 25 Again, the City will require an encroachment permit and traffic control plan to reduce the impacts to a level of less than significant. 16.e.f. No Impact: The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed project and have determined that that there will be no significant impacts to emergency access. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted plans, policies or programs regarding public transit, bicycle or pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G: \PLANNING12010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 26 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Im.act No Impact a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 17.a. No Impact: The project is within the publicly owned right -of -way in developed areas within the City of Temecula, which includes streets, curb, gutter, storm drain, sewer drain, and existing utility lines, such as power lines, telephone lines and cable television lines. The project would not generate a demand for water or wastewater treatment, and thus would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.b. No Impact: The project would not require or result in the expansion or construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.c. No Impact: During the construction of the proposed project, all ground disturbances would be limited to the previously developed, and publicly owned right -of way. To avoid impacts to the existing stormwater system, the applicant is planning to tunnel or bore under existing curbs and gutters where the project proposes to install underground fiber optic communication lines. Therefore, the project would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, and no impacts would occur. 17.d.e. No Impact: The project would not generate a demand for water or wastewater treatment. Therefore, the project would not cause a violation in wastewater treatment requirements, or require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.f.g No Impact: The project will generate a minimal amount of solid waste during construction. The project will include a condition of approval requiring the developer to contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 27 construction debris. The amount of solid waste generated by the project would not be substantial or interfere with the sufficient permitted capacity of nearby landfills and there would be no impact. G:IPLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\PIanning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 28 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X X No Impact a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? b c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: 18.a. Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in the sections above, the project would involve the construction of a utility system and would not significantly impact fish or wildlife resources, nor impact rare, threatened or endangered species. The proposed project with the inclusion of standard conditions of approval and permitting process would not significantly impact cultural or biological resources. 18.b. Less Than Significant Impact: No significant cumulative impacts have been identified with the implementation of the proposed project. 18.c. Less Than Significant Impact: No substantial environmental effects that would cause adverse effects on human beings have been identified. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 29 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. 19 a. The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System Map Sets were used as referenced source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street in Temecula. The Geographic Information System Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.orq. 19 b. There were no impacts that were previously addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis. 19 c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. City of Temecula Development Code 5. Supplemental Information provided by NewPath c/o Crown Castle as required by the City's Telecommunication Ordinance and Conditional Use Permit applications G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 30 Mitigation Monitoring Program NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project AESTHETICS General Impact: Mitigation Measures Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: AIR QUALITY General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Potentially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings New slim -line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street light pole to match existing street lights in the right -of -way. If a new street light is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim -line monopole with concrete street light base — minus the "cobra" light arm may be acceptable. In rural areas, where street lights don't exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete "street light" type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the planning application review and plan check process. Prior to issuance of a building permit Planning Department Short -term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction Implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM) • Minimize land disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: HAZARDS General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Planning staff will mitigation measure review and grading process. Prior to issuance construction Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department • Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials. verify compliance with the above as part of the planning application plan /encroachment permit plan check of associated permits and during Planning and Public Works Departments Directly or indirectly exposing people or structures to potential adverse effects from being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the building and grading plan check review process. Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Andy and Gypsi Denison 30195 Del Rey Rd Temecula, CA 92591 April 21, 2011 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 RE: PA11 -0048 g e l etI vc7,. APR Z 2 2011 BY Dear Council Members and Planning Commission Members: My wife and I are writing this letter to address our concerns with the proposed DAS (cell tower) installation on Del Rey Rd, TM -29 by Crown Castle, Case No: PA11 -0048. The proposed installation is located at the northwest corner of our property wtch is located in Meadowview. We are adamantly opposed to the installation of this cell tower and are asking for your support by not approving proposal PA11 -0048. Our main reasons for opposing this installation are the visually obtrusive changes it will impose to the look and feel of our neighborhood and the constant non - elective exposure to RF energy. It is our hope that the arguments presented here will appeal to you as fellow citizens and neighbors and guide you to deny the approval of PA11-0048. Meadowview is one of the oldest housing tracks in Temecula and one of the most unique. The rural nature of this community makes it both sought after and highly regarded. It is this uniqueness that this proposal threatens and that we are fighting to maintain. Part of the rural feel of this neighborhood is due in part to the absence of street lights. It is our opinion that the proposed 40 ft tower will be a large eye sore in the neighborhood and disrupt the rural feel. Additionally, having a single street light in our neighborhood will be out of place. Even a tower designed as a telephone pole would be obtrusive as we don't have any of those in the neighborhood either. In general, any 40 ft tower placed in the proposed location will "stick like a sore thumb". The cell tower location proposed in PA11 -0048 is questionable to us. The topography of this area is such that the installation location is at a low point within the surrounding area. We would think that a cell tower would be much more efficient and safe if it was located at a high point within the area it was intended to provide service to. There are several homes within view of the proposed tower that are at the same elevation as the antenna portion of the tower. It is probably safe to say that we are not the first family to voice health concerns regarding the installation of cell towers. It is the health of our children, 10 and 4 years old, that is at the forefront of our concern. That being said, I have City of Temecula April 21, 2011 Page 2 carefully reviewed the literature prepared by Crown Castle titled "RF SAFETY: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ". We recognize that we are exposed to RF energy from other sources such as cordless telephones, cell phones, microwaves, etc. The main difference between these sources of RF energy and the propose cell tower is that these sources are elective. We can choose to use a cell phone or cordless phone, thus controlling our exposure to RF. A cell tower in our front yard is not an elective exposure to RF energy, nor is it one that we are willing to accept. Figure 1 below was copied from the FAQ document described above. Co RS A marry as AAaaum tit= Ear:4Y Mere nal 194 Imes Ins Olin =went= RE Energy Nsore tJ % MO times e.s Asa M W','n RP En?/g} Figure 1: Figure describing where RF Energy goes According to the graphic in Figure 1, the maximum RF Energy is transmitted perpendicularly from the antenna at the top of the tower. Upon discovery of this fact, our safety concerns are even stronger. As described above, our home and our neighbor's homes are at the same level as the antenna and in the direction of "Maximum RF Energy". Additionally, we have horses that are housed directly under the tower. Our family spends a great deal of time in that area of our yard playing and caring for our horses. We are again concerned that as we go about our normal activates around our home we will be doing so at a constant non - elective exposure to RF energy. It is our opinion that there is not a clear need for increased cell coverage in this area. The many neighbors that we have spoken with are happy with the level of cell coverage that they currently have. Even if this cell tower is being considered so that consumers may have additional choices in carriers, we highly City of Temecula April 21, 2011 Page 3 doubt that people in this area will consider changing to a different carrier based on the simple fact the people are required to sign a two year agreements for their service. Basically, the cell coverage in this area is more than adequate to meet our needs and the addition of a cell tower is unnecessary in this location. My wife and I are also very upset with the way this project has been communicated to us and our neighbors. First, Crown Castle sent us a post card on Saturday April 16 which was designed to look like a typical piece of junk mail. On Wednesday April 20 we receive a public hearing notice and a sign was posted at the proposed location. Matt Peters was listed as the contact for information regarding the proposal. When we were actually able to speak with Matt ft was Thursday April 21 Matt informed us that we need to submit a letter to the city of Temecula by Friday April 22 in order for it to be considered for the May 4 meeting. Less than a weeks' notice is hardly enough time to allow people to research and respond to a proposal that will have a very large impact on their lives. Again, we ask you not to grant approval to proposal PA11 -0048. Sincerely, Andy and Gypsi Denison Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0044 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks do Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities to an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -15) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 600' east of Margarita Road In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers May 4, 2011 6:00 p.m. Notice of Pubec Hearing Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0045 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks do Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -21) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Margarita Road, approximately 340' east of Avenida Cima Del Sol In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers May 4, 2011 6:00 p.m. Mace of Public Hearing Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0046 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks do Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -25) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 145' west of Via La Vida In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers May 4, 2011 6:00 p.m. 1111.1111111If of Public Hearing Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0047 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks do Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities to an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -27) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 200' east of centerline of Margarita Road In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers May 4, 2011 6:00 p.m. Nodce of Public Hearing Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0048 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks do Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -29) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the west side of Del Rey Road, across from the intersection at Via Corsica In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers May 4, 2011 6:00 p.m. of Public Hearing Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0049 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks do Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities to an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -30) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Avenida Buena Suerte, approximately 100' west of the house at 30661 In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers May 4, 2011 6:00 p.m. Notce of Public Heaaip Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0050 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks do Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -42) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the northwest side of Margarita Road, approximately 370' west of Avenida Barca In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers May 4, 2011 6:00 p.m. of Public Hearing Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner.