Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout072011 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: PUBLIC COMMENTS TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET JULY 20, 2011 — 6:00 PM Earlene Bundy Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio Next in Order: Resolution: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three - minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 6, 2011 1 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 CONTINUED FROM JULY 6, 2011 (at applicant's request): Planning Application No. PA10 -0309, a Development Plan for a two -story, 89,148 square foot senior congregate care facility with 94 units consisting of studio and one bedroom units, generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraqa Road, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10 -0309, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR A TWO- STORY, 89,148 SQUARE FOOT SENIOR CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY FEATURING 94 UNITS CONSISTING OF STUDIO AND ONE BEDROOM UNITS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD (APN 944 - 290 -025) 3 Planning Application No. PA11 -0069, an Antenna Facility Application to allow a cellular facility disguised as a street light to be located within the public right -of -way generally located on Pechanqa Parkway directly across from Via Gilberto, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0069, A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CELLULAR FACILITY DISGUISED AS A STREET LIGHT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY GENERALLY LOCATED ON PECHANGA PARKWAY DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM VIA GILBERTO (CLOSEST APN 961 - 020 -027) 4 Planning Application No. PA11 -0085, a Wireless Antenna Facility to be located on a new 29.5 foot high tubular steel light pole within the right -of -way along the south side of 2 Wolf Valley Road, approximately 283 feet east of the centerline of Pechanga Parkway, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0085, A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CELLULAR FACILITY DISGUISED AS A STREETLIGHT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOLF VALLEY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 283 FEET EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF PECHANGA PARKWAY (CLOSEST APN: 962 - 010 -007) 5 Planning Application Nos. PA10 -0226 and PA11 -0053, a Development Plan and Variance for Chaparral 3, a proposed 23,137 square foot, mixed use, three -story building with retail /restaurant uses on the first floor and mezzanine, and offices above. The Variance request is to reduce the setback at northeast property corner, as well as the parking setback and landscape requirement along the western property line. The project site is addressed as 28455 Old Town Front Street, Cheryl Kitzerow RECOMMENDATION 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA10 -0226 AND PA11 -0053, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR CHAPARRAL 3, A PROPOSED 23,137 SQUARE FOOT, MIXED USE, THREE -STORY BUILDING WITH RETAIL /RESTAURANT USES ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND MEZZANINE, AND OFFICES ABOVE. THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS TO REDUCE THE SETBACK AT NORTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER, AS WELL AS THE PARKING SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. LOCATED AT 28455 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET (APN 922 - 026 -041 6 CONTINUED FROM JUNE 15, 2011: Planning Application No. PA11 -0112, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -18) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the northwest side of Southern Cross Road, across from Sky Terrace Drive, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING 3 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0112, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -18) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD, ACROSS FROM SKY TERRACE DRIVE. 7 CONTINUED FROM JULY 6, 2011: Planning Application No. PA11 -0109, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -13) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Rancho Vista Road, approximately 145' south of the centerline of Paseo Goleta, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0109, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NOTE TM -13) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 145' SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF PASEO GOLETA 8 Planning Application No. PA11 -0114, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -20) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Moraqa Road, approximately 510' south of Rancho California Road, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0114, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -20) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF MORAGA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 510' SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD. 9 Planning Application No. PA11 -0118, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -26) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of La Serena Way, approximately 90' east of Calle Pina 4 Colada Street, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0118, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -26) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LA SERENA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 90' EAST OF CALLE PINA COLADA. 10 Planning Application No. PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -28) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Leena Way directly across Lucca Way, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0119, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -28) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LEENA WAY, DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM LUCCA WAY. 11 Planning Application No. PA11 -0121, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -32) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Nicolas Road, approximately 620' east of Winchester Road, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0121, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -32) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NICOLAS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 620' EAST OF WINCHESTER ROAD. 5 12 Planning Application No. PA11 -0124, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -37) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road approximately 185' west of the centerline of Ynez Road, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0124, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -37) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 185' WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF YNEZ ROAD 13 Planning Application No. PA11 -0125, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -38) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Zevo Drive, approximately 125' west of Diaz Road, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: ADJOURNMENT PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0125, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -38) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ZEVO DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 125' WEST OF DIAZ ROAD REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC - The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 41000 Main Street and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. Additionally, any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commissioners regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review at the locations indicated above. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Planning Commission 6 meeting after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at www.citvoftemecula.orq. 7 PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three - minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of June 15, 2011 APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HARTER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO, KIGHT ABSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Earlene Bundy ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET JULY 6, 2011 — 6:00 PM Commissioner Kight Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio 1 Next in Order: Resolution: 11 -29 Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 CONTINUED FROM MAY 18, 2011 (at applicant's request): Planning Application No. PA10 -0309, a two -phase Development Plan for a three - story, 97,685 square foot senior congregate care facility with 99 units consisting of studio, one bedroom, and two bedroom apartments, generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 To be continued to July 20, 2011 at the applicant's request APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT; VOTE REFLECTED UNIANIMOUS APPROVAL 3 Planning Application No. PA11 -0073, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the existing Q -Club to upgrade their existing ABC alcohol license from a Type 40 to a Type 47 and provide live entertainment located at 27911 Jefferson Avenue, Eric Jones APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0073, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE EXISTING Q -CLUB TO UPGRADE THEIR EXISTING LIQUOR FROM A TYPE 40 TO A TYPE 47 AND PROVIDE LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, LOCATED AT 27911 JEFFERSON AVENUE (APN 921 - 050 -012) 4 Planning Application No. PA11 -0046, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -25) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 145' west of Via La Vida, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL 2 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0046, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -25) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF VIA LA VIDA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 150' SOUTH OF SOLANA WAY 5 Planning Application No. PA11 -0048, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -29) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 425' west of the centerline of Del Rey Road. Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0048, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -29) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOLANA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 435' WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF DEL REY ROAD 6 Planning Application PA11 -0101, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -04) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Pauba Road, approximately 260' west of the Library entrance, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0101, A 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -04) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD IN FRONT OF THE FIRE STATION, APPROXIMATELY 231' WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF CALLE VENTURA 7 Planning Application No. PA11 -0102, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -06) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the west side of Amarita Way, approximately 175' south of Via Riv, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0102, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -06) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF MONTELEGRO WAY, APPROXIMATELY 170' SOUTH OF VIA RIVAS 8 Planning Application No. PA11 -0103, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -07) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the west side of Meadows Parkway, approximately 130' south of of the centerline of Corte IIlora, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0103, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -07) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 474' NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF VIA JASSO 9 Planning Application No. PA11 -0104, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless 4 distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -08) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Jerez Lane, approximately 105' north of the centerline of Sunny Meadows. Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0104, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -08) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SUNNY MEADOWS DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 58 FEET NORTHWEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF JEREZ LANE 10 Planning Application No. PA11 -0106, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities to install a new 40' high concrete street light as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -10) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Crown Hill Road, approximately 70' northwest of the centerline of Sage Court, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0106, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -10) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF CROWN HILL DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 70' SOUTHEAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF PAUBA ROAD 11 Planning Application No. PA11 -0108, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -12) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Pauba Road, approximately 264' west of Via Rami, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 5 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0108, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -12) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 264' WEST OF VIA RAMI 12 Planning Application No. PA11 -0109, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -13) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Rancho Vista Road, approximately 145' south of the centerline of Paseo Goleta, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 To be continued to July 20, 2011 APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNIANIMOUS APPROVAL 13 Planning Application No. PA11 -0111, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -16) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the west side of Avenida De La Reina, approximately 60' south of the centerline of Calle Aragon, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNIANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0111, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -16) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF AVENIDA DE LA REINA, APPROXIMATELY 51' SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF CALLE ARAGON 14 Planning Application No. PA11 -0113, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless 6 REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Pat Kight Chairman distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -19) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Rancho Vista Road, approximately 360' west of Mira Loma Drive, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNIANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0113, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -19) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 280' EAST OF MIRA LOMA DRIVE 7 Patrick Richardson Director of Planning and Redevelopment SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of June 15, 2011 APPROVED 3- 0 -0 -2; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HARTER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO, KIGHT ABSTAINED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 CONTINUED FROM MAY 18, 2011 (at applicant's request): Planning Application No. PA10 -0309, a two -phase Development Plan for a three - story, 97,685 square foot senior congregate care facility with 99 units consisting of studio, one bedroom, and two bedroom apartments, generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraqa Road, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: Earlene Bundy ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET JULY 6, 2011 — 6:00 PM Commissioner Kight Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio 1 Next in Order: Resolution: 11 -29 2.1 To be continued to July 20, 2011 at the applicant's request APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT; VOTE REFLECTED UNIANIMOUS APPROVAL 3 Planning Application No. PA11 -0073, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the existing Q -Club to upgrade their existing ABC alcohol license from a Type 40 to a Type 47 and provide live entertainment located at 27911 Jefferson Avenue, Eric Jones APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0073, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE EXISTING Q -CLUB TO UPGRADE THEIR EXISTING LIQUOR FROM A TYPE 40 TO A TYPE 47 AND PROVIDE LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, LOCATED AT 27911 JEFFERSON AVENUE (APN 921 - 050 -012) 4 Planning Application No. PA11 -0046, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -25) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 145' west of Via La Vida, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0046, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -25) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF VIA LA VIDA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 150' SOUTH OF SOLANA WAY 5 Planning Application No. PA11 -0048, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -29) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Solana Way, approximately 425' west of the centerline of Del Rey Road. Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL 2 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0048, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -29) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOLANA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 435' WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF DEL REY ROAD 6 Planning Application PA11 -0101, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -04) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Pauba Road, approximately 260' west of the Library entrance, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0101, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -04) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD IN FRONT OF THE FIRE STATION, APPROXIMATELY 231' WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF CALLE VENTURA 7 Planning Application No. PA11 -0102, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -06) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the west side of Amarita Way, approximately 175' south of Via Riv, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0102, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -06) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF MONTELEGRO WAY, APPROXIMATELY 170' SOUTH OF VIA RIVAS 8 Planning Application No. PA11 -0103, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -07) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the west side of Meadows Parkway, approximately 130' south of of the centerline of Corte Illora, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0103, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -07) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 474' NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF VIA JASSO 9 Planning Application No. PA11 -0104, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -08) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Jerez Lane, approximately 105' north of the centerline of Sunny Meadows. Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0104, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE 4 TM -08) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SUNNY MEADOWS DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 58 FEET NORTHWEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF JEREZ LANE 10 Planning Application No. PA11 -0106, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install antenna facilities to install a new 40' high concrete street light as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -10) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Crown Hill Road, approximately 70' northwest of the centerline of Sage Court, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0106, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -10) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF CROWN HILL DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 70' SOUTHEAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF PAUBA ROAD 11 Planning Application No. PA11 -0108, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -12) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Pauba Road, approximately 264' west of Via Rami, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0108, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -12) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 264' WEST OF VIA RAMI 5 12 Planning Application No. PA11 -0109, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -13) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Rancho Vista Road, approximately 145' south of the centerline of Paseo Goleta, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 To be continued to July 20, 2011 APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNIANIMOUS APPROVAL 13 Planning Application No. PA11 -0111, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -16) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the west side of Avenida De La Reina, approximately 60' south of the centerline of Calle Aragon, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNIANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0111, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -16) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF AVENIDA DE LA REINA, APPROXIMATELY 51' SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF CALLE ARAGON 14 Planning Application No. PA11 -0113, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -19) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Rancho Vista Road, approximately 360' west of Mira Loma Drive, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED UNIANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0113, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL 6 A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -19) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 280' EAST OF MIRA LOMA DRIVE Pat Standardi, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Michael McBride, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Andy Denison, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission John Foster, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Timothy Ives, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Tom Engels, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Lisa Engels, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Sandra Sikes, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Deborah Christensen, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Antonio Modegano, Temecula resident addressed the Planning Commission Celia Portilla, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Henry Pollak, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Pat Kight Chairman 7 Patrick Richardson Director of Planning and Redevelopment DATE OF MEETING: July 20, 2011 STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application No. PA10 -0309, a Development Plan for a two - SUMMARY: story, 89,148 square foot senior congregate care facility featuring 94 units consisting of studio and one bedroom units generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: Mitigated Negative Declaration w/ Monitoring Plan Section 15070 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Larry Markham, MDMG, Inc. on behalf of Buron Inc. General Plan Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Lot Area: Professional Office (PO) Zoning Designation: Professional Office (PO) Site: Vacant/Professional Office (PO) North: Rancho California Road, Existing Commercial /Community Commercial (CC) South: Via Las Colinas, Existing Apartments /High Density Residential East: Moraga Road, Existing Apartments /Medium Density Residential West: Vacant, Existing Office /Professional Office (PO) Existinq /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required 3.28 Acres 0.92 Acres Minimum Required Total Floor Area /Ratio: N/A N/A Landscape Area /Coverage: 1.55 Proposed 0.25 Minimum Parking Required /Provided: 49 Proposed 44 Required C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007832.doc BACKGROUND SUMMARY On October 21, 2010, Larry Markham of MDMG Inc. submitted Planning Application No. PA010- 0309. The application is for a Development Plan designed to allow the construction of a 89,148 square foot senior congregate care facility comprised of 94 units within an area zoned Professional Office. Congregate care facilities are permitted by right in areas zoned Professional Office. The project will consist of two wards. The first will contain 44 rooms and will be dedicated to patients with memory loss, Dementia and Alzheimer's disease. The second will contain 50 rooms. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The project will be constructed on a parcel totaling 3.28 acres. Rancho California Road is located on the north boundary, Moraga Road is on the east boundary, Via Las Colinas boarders the south. A vacant lot is located immediately to the west. The surrounding area consists of existing commercial uses and medium and high density residential units. The project will consist of a two -story, 89,148 square foot senior congregate care facility. This structure will contain 94 units with 44 of these being reserved for residents suffering from memory related illnesses and 50 units for non -memory care residents. The units will consist of studio, efficiency studio, and one bedroom floor plans. An outdoor courtyard and areas for resident recreation will also be provided. Ingress and egress for the site will occur at two points. The primary access to the facility will be placed on Moraga Road. This entrance will take patrons into the parking lot in which the applicant will provide forty -nine spaces. Forty -four spaces are required per Table 17.24.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code. The site plan also shows that decorative stamped concrete will be used in the site entrances as well as the drop -off areas to the structure. Five retaining walls will be constructed for the project. The first three are located on the northwest and northeast corners of the property and each total three feet in height. The wall on the southwest corner facing Via Las Colinas will total two feet. The retaining wall located on the southeast portion of the property will total six feet. All retaining walls will be screened by landscaping. Architecture The project includes many design elements widely found in Southern California. For example, the applicant has chosen to incorporate mission style roof tiles and stone will be used on the support columns throughout the structure. The exterior wall of the project will consist of a cement pilaster with an acyclic sand pebble finish. The overall building form has been designed to ensure the project is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding area. For example, the project incorporates varied rooflines and wall planes. Trellises along the east, south, and north elevations will create further visual interest for the project. These measures will ensure the two -story structure avoids having a "boxy" appearance. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007832.doc A screen wall will be located on the west and a portion of the north elevations. This wall will total six feet in height and will be constructed to match the overall structure with regard to finish. This will ensure continuity between the wall and structure. Landscaping Landscaping for the project will feature a variety of trees shrubs and ground cover plant material. These plant materials will surround the property and will thus serve as a way to soften the hardscape features such as pedestrian walkways, drive isles, and parking areas. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on March 11, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. Revised notices were sent out to property owners within the required 600 -foot radius on July 6, 2011 to account for revisions to the plans. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an initial study, it has been determined the project will not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. An Initial Study was prepared for the project in an effort to further evaluate if the project would generate any potentially significant impacts to the environment, This document was distributed and made available for public review on March 11, 2011. The results of the initial Study show environmental impacts for the project are all less than significant with the mitigation proposed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program developed for the project. FINDINGS Development Plan (Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. As conditioned, the project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed use as a compatible use within Professional Office zoning areas, and the project is in conformance with other Ordinances of the City and State law. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. As conditioned, the project has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In addition, the project has also been reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part of the initial Study process to further ensure that the project has been designed and appropriately conditioned so that it will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007832.doc ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Initial Study Mitigation Monitoring Plan Notice of Public Hearing C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007832.doc 250 500 Feet CO I n S co H. M 5.8 cp co »T . O F; r ,?,'n 3 3 ° P.% �p N c {v" N 8 0 -0 0 3 - n a m Z 0 0 D 6 2 de ,$g If aE xE3 dg 9 g •1 1 i 1 E a L is ri AAA gat MORAL A ROAD 4 e ssa e YIP • 9D s 0 0 p` m II as 1,, a; ; pi In 11 9 k C 9 y 9 O rI a Is= Ma sno4A 1 V1 m 0 z 0 —n O 0 z w - . 9 c CD cn Y4'1 3 Aa - 3 4.) (3 §g' 3 • m az, CO C 0 0 0 -0 3 0 z 0 .to 0 14 a 1:4i 0 _0 a - Z • co I IV ..W = :I (Q S a o ( p m � O. co :° yob• r G u 0- 0 w3 1 we ,.1 EP 3 . R ,, c d > v F 0 m m > z s O o D P O O 6 5 z CO 0 0 x rn D '4* t 0 fi Z • °J a CC) *f._ 0 I d m a r c f7 7 C w3 c —{ d � ; 3 cp d 0 9 a 3 m m n d N z O 0 0 , o 8 9 e� P, 74 c0 to N c fD to N f1 C n 0 0 0 0 m z 0 0 O m 8 Z z Xf m D m Z 6 c om E m2 c.o* 0) 0 (0 — 1 (D 3 0 ID 0 ID 3 -o 0 o ID z 0 -0 9 0 z 0 r- 0 g Z • L 0 U) cn cn m H 0 z n 0 m r < z 0 0 0 Z S C1 th 0 f _ 5 —1 (DD N A c B1 0 v 3 co v 3 n b z O D 9 (0 (0 0.1 cr. co 0 z r <. to 3 0 0, c fD 0 a 00 0 - 0 ( 7" 0 t") ›.] 4 ""' [- „„ 0 ___. 0 1' • lEa ,ti uicc :r. tn + c 0 o 0 co ;n co n IYNipi. lMxK J n 1W ! 3 !i � I ; i i !� , 1 1 1 � 6 �� ► (�( ! g 1 1 ! ' ,� l i lll l rill i l � 1 .1 1 11 � 1 � 6;+ D. { VIII' i 1I I dill 111 Y.IIS1 I ft :E Ii . 4 III !1 SF I I i I 1 � o I1 I t !► 1'I b i i 1 h I 1 ! till ► 'i i i d iill At H ACarSIBIUn J DWEWNG UNITS M*.rC 1 o a , •• w Dove un n o EARANCES AT DOORS Mt.:OV AREAS vfrsw • 3 { ! rA%r uuu I ® ii woa AOC a; ! 1H iiiit s S�+ Ih I SF 1 I 1 1 �g R FI D 3 14 ORAL a , s .9 • � f Y }if ' i � •; a n a ; d a i l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 if(i l . 11 / 1 9r;f t!►F f it 1111111 X11 m1 ' , 1 ,� � � HIM'I i q �� i �� ; � I "� i 1 I � i I I 1 1 1 if i d D 541 8 9 1 I 1 111 : d ! 11 i 11 , 1 1 Y1111 1pc51 1 f 111 1lil 1;' I `$ i 11 ' 1 � ji i i iqi' i' l 1 I 1 1 l "Fii 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 i 1 D5 1 1 .7 1 11. 1 1 041 1 iil „ ii i �I 1 # 1 ' I 1 10 11 1 11 f� 11 i1 1 i. 1 ill f 1 0 1 1 =1 1 1 , '; 11011111 Y 1 F 1 QIg!( I F t 1 1 F h as f!13 f 1I , I I 1 ' d;1 i f Y�I.13 1 € � 1 F fF 1 1 it 1 Fi, III i 1 E t 1; 1 � i d X 11 Di 1 1 ii ' �1 1 1 + 1 1 11 Aid 1 i l 1 111 1. 6 l ! 1 11 I6 I4 1 l l I1 I I BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS 22410.02 00:12.613-11 C01 2011 8 f1 pp CBC BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS -2010 EDITION I ; 1 3 1 1 1 i i# I 1 91 • 3 { ! rA%r uuu G Y:i ii f Y 1 I 1 1 • FI D 3 14 ORAL a , s .9 • � f Y }if ' i � •; a n a ; d a i l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 if(i l . 11 / 1 9r;f t!►F f it 1111111 X11 m1 ' , 1 ,� � � HIM'I i q �� i �� ; � I "� i 1 I � i I I 1 1 1 if i d D 541 8 9 1 I 1 111 : d ! 11 i 11 , 1 1 Y1111 1pc51 1 f 111 1lil 1;' I `$ i 11 ' 1 � ji i i iqi' i' l 1 I 1 1 l "Fii 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 i 1 D5 1 1 .7 1 11. 1 1 041 1 iil „ ii i �I 1 # 1 ' I 1 10 11 1 11 f� 11 i1 1 i. 1 ill f 1 0 1 1 =1 1 1 , '; 11011111 Y 1 F 1 QIg!( I F t 1 1 F h as f!13 f 1I , I I 1 ' d;1 i f Y�I.13 1 € � 1 F fF 1 1 it 1 Fi, III i 1 E t 1; 1 � i d X 11 Di 1 1 ii ' �1 1 1 + 1 1 11 Aid 1 i l 1 111 1. 6 l ! 1 11 I6 I4 1 l l I1 I I BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS 22410.02 00:12.613-11 C01 2011 —0 r f 7 r"..D•rr e tre fee f : fee freff e tili I I e rr,. 1 I r e rrs. r ▪ pm / ✓ r ▪ 1\r I i 1 fer I 1 f f ‘ r 1 f ..• T ,. t Ale e : I [ ... 1r li e • trrerer eterer r 0 +4'. r r ( fee e : r r r r r r i r r 2 r ‘ r ‘: I i t 1 ; el er:re :erre r 0 re f reefer .. a r/ OM , r , r i r r r r ererre_r-• e - e r r c ';',... - - - -e r- ttr" n - 7 r err:re rr r ' r 1 1 I I TT Tr ( , ° ()C) A was ran. I tore max ma. 1 ...Co wao rao. 1 r w 1 w wea 1 r m-o•r am i'r $•.•• rr,r roasa.r ono.m saa rpm gal vim• f .ar �•� Ca w u• ?r 1U 8p . ,.'11$0 A40 I men o . I newest ..r 140010. +w 1 rn 1..a I awes Ira wci I twos c.a. 1 ! i .an per.. ,..mw,,.r. .. . cU wr Tam 00 MY 11 1 a .r.o....).117'C MIS I osm _ Riw•nm ••••• li f rp M Isom scut .bona 1 1 1 few oa nr SO Wr ■••4t. onCr rn(` N.t .r i gg S � x!xx�z aaaaAF I r. I 1.Y outl FF IS � w..ea• spew •roc w • raw f w.,.aw ..s rmo• ros Fl 71 Mt • lass c. wwm tso.�waow•r or. I mat sow /.w 1 oaat u.w has.+ s•w , ••e r-. +. onat twa hoow r.r . MOO r+ nr ooar TM /MOO s• W . nC r.r a L rar r-..¢ /peon )M . sae r - .. l 888 p pp p p p aaa� 9 9 Q 11 1 1 11 A if % �;ti 0 a I < bp HIGHGATE seloR LIVING .w1103 mien, aR.R Rat MODW ll SO rlfs)m aoaoolo .4Y 1mo 0174I0 OOMTN.T PAW • ALHAMBRA GROUP LANDSCAPE c �we / 2017 RE NECRW1ON muss oruum+c rl+e�a ��l�l�n"'t n Iwael J o. o� IIII � s �QQ a : as TIIiIiiJkIi AR. fe.A 7;4 MO 1/3 w 3 0 0 ;i LC) 3 0 0 0 a 1 1 APN, g tl 44 °RA a 8 E ; 6 PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10 -0309, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR A TWO - STORY, 89,148 SQUARE FOOT SENIOR CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY FEATURING 94 UNITS CONSISTING OF STUDIO AND ONE BEDROOM UNITS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD (APN 944 - 290 -025) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 21, 2010, Larry Markham with MDMG Inc. filed Planning Application No. PA10 -0309, a Development Plan Application, on behalf of Buron Inc., in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, continued the Application and environmental review on April 6, 2011 to the April 20, 2011 regular meeting, the item was then continued to the following hearings: May 4, 2011, May 18, 2011, June 1, 2011, June 15, 2011, July 6, 2011 and July 20, 2011. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA10 -0309 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan (Section 17.05.010.F) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; As conditioned, the project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed use as a compatible use within Professional Office C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007835.doc zoning areas, and the project is in conformance with other Ordinances of the City and State law. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; As conditioned, the project has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In addition, the project has also been reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part of the Initial Study process to further ensure that the project has been designed and appropriately conditioned so that it will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application, a Development Plan for a two -story, 89,148 square foot senior congregate care facility featuring 94 units consisting of studio and one bedroom units generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road. A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Development Plan Application, as described in the Initial Study ( "the Project "). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on March 11, 2011, and expired on March 31, 2011. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. C. No written comment(s) were received prior to the public hearing. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the July 20, 2011 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007835.doc E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA PA10 -0309, a Development Plan for a two -story, 89,148 square foot senior congregate care facility featuring 94 units consisting of studio and one bedroom units generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp\1007835.doc Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007835.doc Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA10 -0309 Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: PL -1. General Requirements EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand One Hundred and Eight Dollars ($2,108.00) which includes the Two Thousand Forty -Four Dollar ($2,044.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty -Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc A Development Plan application for a two -story, 89,148 square foot senior congregate care facility featuring 94 units consisting of studio and one bedroom units generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road (APN 944 - 290 -026) 944 - 290 -026 Commercial Service Commercial Service Commercial (Per TUMF Worksheets A.2.1 & A.2.3) PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL -7. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -8. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -9. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -10. The applicant shall paint a three -foot by three -foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. PL -11. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL -12. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Exterior Walls (Cement Plaster) Acrylic Sand Pebble Finish — Match Kelly Moore "Haverstraw" 4177 Roof Tile (Mission Style Concrete S) Monier Life Tile "Salerno Clay" Window Frames (Aluminum) Dark Bronze Anodized — Clear Glass Stone (Strucutre) El Dorado Stone — Mountain Ledge "Yukon" Railings (Steel) Painted to Match Window Frames Trellis Members (Rough Sawn Heavy Dark Brown Timber) Stone (Paving) Ashler Stone — Scofield Systems PL -13. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. PL -14. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Planning Director. PL -15. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations submitted February 23, 2011, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -16. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL -17. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. PL -18. All parkways, including within the right -of -way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities and on -site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. PL -19. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing streetlights shall be paid for by the developer. PL -20. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL -21. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL -22. Double detector check valves shall be installed internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right -of -way, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. PL -23. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -24. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. PL -25. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation. PL -26. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authorityto stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. PL -27. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer. PL -28. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. PL -29. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc PL -30. A 30 -day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30 -day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to scheduling the pre - grading meeting with Public Works. PL -31. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing /clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre - grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30 -day preconstruction surveythat shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on -site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Department approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on -site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." PL -32. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -33. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL -34. A minimum of a 7 -foot wide landscape planting area shall be provided at the end of each parking isle. PL -35. All downspouts shall be internalized. PL -36. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -37. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five -foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL -38. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi fora minimum period of two hours without loss C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007836.doc of pressure, which will require inspection of irrigation installation of open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head -to -head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicantlowner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -39. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -40. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -41. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long -term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL -42. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure, which will require inspection of irrigation installation of open trenches. The second inspection will verifythat all irrigation systems have head -to -head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicantlowner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -43. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. PL -44. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -45. Roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. PL -46. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three -foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after - thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007836.doc PL -47. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape (choose or add to as appropriate) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -48. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PL -49. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45 -inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. PL -50. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. PL -51. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional streetlights, whichever occurs first, the developer shall complete the Temecula Community Services District application, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan, and pay the advanced energy fees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -52. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his /her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL -53. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right -of -ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right -of -way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. PL -54. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL -55. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc PL -56. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off - street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696- 3000." PL -57. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. PL -58. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL -59. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL -60. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated November 9, 2010, a copy of which is attached. PL -61. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated November 15, 2010, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions /Information B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans. B -4. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. B -5. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007836.doc B -6. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. B -7. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights -of -way. B -8. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B -9. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B -10. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B -11. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one - quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. B -12. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. B -13. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. B -14. Commercial projects shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal B -15. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. B -16. Provide a Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2007 edition of the California Building Code. B -17. Provide number and type of restroom fixtures, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Plumbing Code. B -18. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc B -19. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. B -20. Provide side view plan with minimum clearance 114" for the required covered roof at passenger loading zone Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -21. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B -22. A pre- construction meeting is required with the building inspector priorto the start of the building construction. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F -1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F -2. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 4 -hour duration on a looped system (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020, Section R). F -3. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on -site and offsite 6" x 4" x 2 -2 1 /" outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020, Section R). F -4. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on -site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on -site fire hydrants are required (CFC Chapter 5, Section 508.5). F -5. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.4) Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F -6. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all- weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007836.doc of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F -7. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F -8. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2.7. and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F -9. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.1.2). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F -10. The developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on -site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14, Section 1412 and Chapter 5, Section 501.3). F -11. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F -12. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F -13. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) per City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E. F -14. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial, multi - family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6 -inch high letters and /or numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC Chapter 5, Section 505.1 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F -15. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5, Section 506). C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc F -16. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and /or signs (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.3). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would -be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. PD -2. Applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would -be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six -foot clearance from the buildings. PD -3. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. PD -4. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. PD -5. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with Riverside County Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655, low pressure sodium lighting preferred. PD -6. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. PD -7. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mount light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. PD -8. This project must meet the energy efficiency requirements of Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. PD -9. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. PD -10. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24- hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP. PD -11. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PD -12. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well - lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. PD -13. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc PD -14. Employee training regarding retail /credit card theft, citizens' arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit. PD -15. Any business that serves or sells any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. PD -16. Applicant will comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. PD -17. Any business that serves or sells any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes special events held at business locations where alcohol will be served for a fee and the event is open to the general public. PD -18. Applicant will ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages are trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department provides free training for all employers and employees involved in service and sales of alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a training session for all new employees. Contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Office at (951) 695 -2773 to setup a training date. Training should be completed prior to the grand opening of this business and periodic updated training should be conducted when new employees /management are hired. PD -19. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: (a) valid California driver's license; (b) valid California identification card; (c) valid military identification card ( active /reserve /retired /dependent); (d) valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, and County or City agency. PD -20. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued bya Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B &P), which includes the following requirements: (a) name of person; (b) date of birth; (c) physical description; (d) photograph; (e) currently valid (not expired). It is the responsibility of business owners and any person who sells or serves alcoholic beverages PD -21. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc PW -1. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi - public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two -way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. PD -22. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department. PD -23. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695 -2773. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on -site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City- maintained street right -of -way. PW -3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right -of -way. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc PW -4. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW -5. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls into the design of the project to prevent non - permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm drain system or receiving water during all field - related activities. PW -6. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be conceptually accepted bythe City prior to the initial grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered civil engineer and include Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management Practices, (BMPs), source controls, and treatment devices. PW -7. All onsite drainage and water quality features shall be privately maintained. PW -8. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 35481 as approved on October 3, 2007. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW -9. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must receive final acceptance by the City prior to issuance of any grading permit. PW -10. PW -11. PW -12. PW -13. PW -14. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations forthe construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. The developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. Construction -phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc PW -15. PW -16. PW -19. PW -20. PW -21. PW -22. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Planning Department, or other affected agencies. PW -17. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW -18. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. The developer shall obtain letters of approval for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. The developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Improvement plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum overA.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Number 207A. c. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number 800. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number. 400. e. All street and driveway center line intersections shall be at 90 degrees. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc PW -23. PW -24. PW -25. PW -26. PW -27. PW -29. PW -30. PW -32. PW -33. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut -off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. The developer shall construct all public improvements outlined in these conditions to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. Improve Rancho California Road (Principal Arterial (6 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 100 -110' R/W) to include installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and raised landscaped median. Improve Moraga Road (Residential Collector (2 lanes undivided) Road Standard No. 103A -66' R /W) to include installation of half -width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). Improve Via Las Colinas (General Local Street Standard No. 104 -60' R/W) to include installation of half -width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). The developer shall construct all public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works including street improvements, which may include, but not limited to, pavement, curb and gutter, median, sidewalk, drive approaches; streetlights, signing, striping, other traffic control devices as appropriate; sewer and domestic water systems; under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines; and storm drain facilities. PW -28. The developer shall vacate and dedicate the abutters rights of access along Moraga Road and Via Las Colinas pursuant to the new location of the driveway. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW -31. The developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007836.doc Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW -34. PW -35. PW -38. The project shall demonstrate the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. PW -36. Corner property line cut off shall be required per City of Temecula Standard No. 603A. PW -37. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -39. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007836.doc City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Highgate Senior Living, Development Plan Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Eric Jones, Assistant Planner (951) 506 -5115 Project Location Generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road Project Sponsor's Name and Address Larry R. Markham MDMG, Inc. 41635 Enterprise Circle North Temecula, CA 92590 General Plan Designation Professional Office (PO) Zoning Professional Office (PO) Description of Project The proposed project consists of the construction of a two- phase, three -story, 99 -unit senior congregate care facility totaling 97,685 square feet with associated parking on 3.40 acres. Phase one of the project will total 77,161 square feet and phase two will total 20,524 square feet. A lot line adjustment designed to increase the project area by 0.78 acres will be analyzed by a separate application. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The site is currently a vacant lot that has been previously rough graded. To the east and south of the project are existing multi - family apartment complexes. To the west are existing office buildings. To the north, across Rancho California Road, is an existing commercial development including a gas station, car wash and retail /restaurant uses. Other public agencies whose approval is required None C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Noise Air Quality Population and Housing Biological Resources Public Services Greenhouse Gas Emissions Recreation Cultural Resources Transportation and Traffic Geology and Soils Utilities and Service Systems Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mandatory Findings of Significance Hydrology and Water Quality None Land Use and Planning Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. 3- s- il Si. • .ture Date • Eric Jones City of Temecula Printed Name For G:PLANNING\2010\PA10-0309 High Gale OP'Planing\EnvironmentaNnitial Study\CEQA Initial Study.docx 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: 1.a. No Impact: The proposed project is on vacant land. No scenic vistas have been identified per the City's General Plan or will be adversely impacted from developing the proposed project. No impacts are expected. 1.b. No Impact: No major rock outcroppings or historic buildings exist on the project site. The project site is not located on a scenic highway. No impacts are expected. 1.c. Less Than Significant Impact: Apartment residents living across Moraga Road (to the east of the project) and across Via Las Colinas (to the south of the project) will be most affected by the proposed development. However, this project will not degrade the existing character of the area. The project fits within its current Professional Office zoning and General Plan designation and is a vacant parcel entirely surrounded by existing commercial uses and apartment complexes. The City's Development Code and Design Guidelines establish design and landscaping standards which will ensure that the project site is developed in a manner consistent with the City's standards. Based on fulfilling the City's code and design standards, project aesthetic impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. 1.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project site is currently vacant with no sources of light or glare. The proposed project will introduce new generators of light and glare. However, this project will be constructed in accordance with zoning development standards including maximum height, landscape buffers, and the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Riverside County Mount Palomar Ordinance 655. Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? X b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? X d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use X e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? X Comments: 2.a. No Impact: According to Open Space /Conservation Element of the City of Temecula General Plan, pages 0S -18 and 0S -19, Table 0S -5 "Significant Farmland" and Figure 0S -3 "Agricultural Resources" depict that the project is not located in an area of farmland of statewide or local importance. The subject site is not currently being used for agricultural purposes, and the City's General Plan Land Use Element has designated the site for Professional Office uses. Therefore, there will be less than significant impacts as a result from the project. 2.b.e. No Impact: The site is not under a Williamson Act contract nor is it zoned for agricultural uses. This property is not considered prime or unique farmland of statewide or local importance as identified by the State Department of Conservation and the City of Temecula General Plan. In addition, the project will not involve changes in the existing environment, which would result in the conversion of farmland to non - agricultural uses. No impact is anticipated from this proposed project. 2.c.d. No Impact: The project location is not suitable for forest and /or timberland uses as defined by the Public Resources and Government Codes. Forest land is defined as land that can support 10 percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation and other public benefits. The proposed project site is zoned Professional Office (PO) and not as a C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx Timberland Production Zone as defined by Section 51104(g) of the Government Code. As such, the parcel is not available to grow trees commercially as required by the timberland definition contained in Section 4526 of the Public Resources Code. In addition, forest land does not exist on the parcel or in the immediate area. No impact is expected. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: 3.a. No Impact: According to an Air Quality Impact Study prepared by PCR Services Corporation and dated March 2011, no significant adverse impacts are anticipated from the project site upon completion of this project. The study states that the RTP projects that population in the City of Temecula (local area) will grow by about 4,000 persons between 2011 and 2014. The proposed project, which contains 99 beds, is projected to result in a net population increase of approximately 100 persons, which is 2.5 percent of the total population growth projected for the local area, although it is conservative to assume that all future residents currently reside outside the local area. The RTP estimates that employment in the local area will grow by about 4,295 jobs between 2011 and 2014. The proposed project is projected to result in a net increase of 85 full -time equivalent jobs, or approximately two percent of the total job growth for the area. Such levels of population and employment growth are consistent with the population and employment forecasts for the local area as adopted by SCAG. Because the SCAQMD has incorporated these same projections in the AQMP, it can be concluded that the project would be consistent with the projections in the AQMP. As a result, implementation of the proposed project would result in no impact related to the implementation of the applicable air quality plans, and no mitigation measures would be necessary. 3.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Construction The SCAQMD has established daily significance thresholds that address pollution sources associated with general construction activities, such as the operation of on -site construction equipment, fugitive dust from site grading activities, and travel by construction workers. Project construction emissions were calculated using the URBEMIS2007 emissions inventory model, originally developed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The analysis assumed that construction activities would comply with applicable portions of SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding the control of fugitive dust. Construction emissions are presented in Table 1, Regional Unmitigated Construction Emissions, under conservative assumptions, which imply a default equipment mix and a worst -case construction schedule. As indicated therein, the incremental increase in emissions from project construction activities would fall below SCAQMD significance thresholds for regional emissions. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx Operation Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2011. C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007837.docx Table 1 Regional Unmitigated Construction Emissions a (Pounds per Day) VOC NO CO SO2 PM b PM Phase One- Maximum Regional Emissions (On -site + Off -site) Mass Site Gradingc 4 33 19 <1 7 3 Fine Site Grading 3 22 14 <1 7 3 Building Construction d 13 39 25 <1 3 2 Phase Two- Maximum Regional Emissions (On -site + Off -site) Building Construction d 18 32 22 <1 2 2 Maximum Regional Emissions 18 39 25 <1 7 3 Regional Construction Daily Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Over /(Under) (57) (61) (525) (150) (143) (52) Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Compiled using the URBEM!S2007 emissions inventory model The equipment mix and use assumption for each phase is provided in the Air Quality Appendices. b PM and PM25 emissions estimates are based on compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements for fugitive dust suppression. Grading assumes that up to 20% of the site is graded on a daily basis. Building Construction phase includes paving and architectural coatings. The SCAQMD LSTs are based on Source Receptor Area 26 (Temecula Valley) interpolated for a 3.40 acre site with sensitive receptors located approximately 25 meters from the construction activity. 25 meters is the shortest distance for which an CST has been established. The proposed project's incremental increase in regional and localized emissions resulting from operation of the project would not exceed any of the SCAQMD thresholds. As such, the proposed project would not have a significant impact on regional air quality, and no mitigation measures are necessary. Pollutant emissions resulting from project operational activities were calculated using the URBEMIS 2007 model. Because the site is currently vacant, all trips related to the proposed residences are considered an increase from baseline. Mobile source emission calculations utilize the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rate calculated by URBEMIS 2007 based on the specific proposed land use and intensity. The daily rate is based on the number of daily trips for each land use and applied to a commute percentage and an average trip length, both of which are land use specific values derived from the URBEMIS 2007. These values account for variations in trip frequency and length associated with commuting to the proposed project. Emission factors specific to the buildout year are projected based on Basin - specific fleet turnover rates and the impact of future emission standards and fuel efficiency standards. The increase in the consumption of fossil fuels to provide power, heat, and ventilation was considered in the calculations as stationary point source emissions. Future fuel consumption rates are estimated based on land use specific energy consumption rates. Natural gas and electricity usage factors derived from the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook are used to project fuel consumption rates. The emission factors used in this analysis represent a State -wide average of known power producing facilities, utilizing various technologies and emission control strategies, and do not take into account any unique emissions profile. At this time, these emission factors are considered conservative and representative. Area source emissions were calculated by URBEMIS 2007, and include emissions from natural gas and landscape fuel combustion, consumer products, and architectural coatings (future maintenance). As shown in Table 2 (Proposed Project - Related Operational Emissions), pollutant concentrations resulting from Project operation would not exceed SCAQMD localized thresholds. Therefore, localized air quality impacts would be less than significant. Emission Source Table 2 Proposed Project - Related Operational Emissions (Pounds per Day) VOC NO CO SO PM PM2.5 Operation of Phase One a On Road Mobile Sources 1 1 12 <1 2 <1 Area Sources 3 <1 2 <1 <1 <1 Stationary Sources <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total Project 4 2 15 <1 2 1 SCAQMD daily Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Over (Under) (51) (53) (535) (150) (148) (55) Significant? No No No No No No Operation of Phase One and Two a On Road Mobile Sources 2 3 24 <1 5 1 Area Sources 5 <1 2 <1 <1 <1 Stationary Sources <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total Project 8 4 26 <1 5 <1 SCAQMD daily Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Over (Under) (47) (51) (522) (150) (145) (54) Significant? No No No No No No a Emissions were calculated using the URBEMIS 2007 emissions model. Model output sheets are provided in Appendix A. Numbers may not add up exactly due to rounding. Sources: PCR Services Corporation, 2011. 3.c. Less Than Significant Impact: As stated above, the proposed project would result in minimal new Tong -term stationary sources and generate additional vehicular trips from the baseline. However, the regional emissions calculated for the proposed project and presented in Tables 1 and 2 remain less than the applicable SCAQMD thresholds, which are designed to assist the region in attaining the applicable State and national ambient air quality standards. These standards apply to both primary (criteria and precursor) and secondary pollutants (ozone). Although the Project site is located in a region that is in non- attainment for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5, the emissions associated with the proposed project would not be cumulatively considerable as the emissions would fall below SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary. 3.d. Less Than Significant Impact: Some population groups, such as children, the elderly, and acutely ill and chronically ill persons, especially those with cardio- respiratory diseases, are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others. The Project is located in the City of Temecula, surrounded by commercial and C: \Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp\1007837.docx residential uses and some vacant land. Single Family Residential land uses are located adjacent to the east, south and southwest of the project site and Quest Diagnostics (a medical office) is located to the west. However, the closest sensitive receptors to the Project site are the residences south of the project site, approximately 17 meters from the Project site. The SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds (LSTs) represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal and state standards. Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2011. C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007837.docx Table 3 Localized Construction Emissions a (Pounds per Day) VOC NO CO SO2 PMlob PM2.5b Phase One- Maximum Localized Emissions (On -site Only) By Stage Mass Site Grading 4 32 17 <1 7 3 Fine Site Grading 4 31 16 <1 7 3 Building Construction 12 36 19 <1 2 2 Phase Two- Maximum Localized Emissions (On -site Only) By Stage Building Construction 18 31 16 <1 2 2 Maximum Localized Emissions 18 36 19 <1 2 3 Localized Significance Thresholds e N/A 300 1,515 N/A 10 6 Over /(Under) Threshold N/A (264) (1,497) N/A (2) (3) Exceed Threshold? No No No No o Compiled using the URBEMIS2007 emissions inventory model. The equipment mix and use assumption for each phase is provided in the Air Quality Appendices. • Mh and PM emissions estimates are based on compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements for fugitive dust suppression. • Grading assumes that up to 20% of the site is graded on a daily basis. Building Construction phase includes paving and architectural coatings. • The SCAQMD LSTs are based on Source Receptor Area 26 (Temecula Valley) interpolated for a 3.40 acre site with sensitive receptors located approximately 25 meters from the construction activity. 25 meters is the shortest distance for which an LST has been established. Note: Numbers may not add up exactly due to rounding On -site emissions, a sub -set of the total construction emissions presented above, were calculated and presented in Table 3, Localized Construction Emissions. The applicable SCAQMD LSTs are also listed on Table 3. As demonstrated in Table 3, the incremental increase in emissions from the project's construction activities would be below SCAQMD LST look -up thresholds and sensitive populations near to the site are not expected to be exposed to substantial pollutant levels. Localized construction impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary. Because the project would not introduce any substantial stationary sources of on -site emissions (such as industrial boilers or generators), CO is the benchmark pollutant for assessing local area air quality impacts from post- construction operations. Given the nature of the proposed project (residential), vehicle exhaust is the primary source of CO. In an urban setting the highest CO concentrations are generally found within close proximity to congested intersection locations. Under typical meteorological conditions, CO concentrations tend to decrease as distance from the emissions source (i.e., congested intersection) increase. The SCAQMD recommends performing a CO hotspots analysis if the project increases the V/C ratio by 2% and worsens an existing LOS D or worse. Based on standard ITE trip generation rates, the project would generate less than 40 trips during the peak hour. Since the project would not generate a significant number of peak hour trips, a CO hotspots analysis was not required. The greatest potential for construction period toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions would be related to diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during grading and excavation activities. In addition, incidental amounts of toxic substances such as oils, solvents, and paints would be used. These substances would comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules for their manufacture and use. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of individual cancer risk. "Individual Cancer Risk" is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 70 -year lifetime will contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk - assessment methodology. Given the relatively short -term construction schedule of 3 years, the proposed Project would not result in a long -term (i.e., 70 years) substantial source of TAC emissions with no residual emissions after construction and corresponding individual cancer risk. As such, Project - related toxic emission impacts during construction would not be significant. The proposed project may require the installation of back -up diesel powered emergency generators. All new generators would be required to comply with applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations and include the Best Available Control Technology (BACT). The installation of equipment with the potential to emit TACs must demonstrate, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1401, that no off -site sensitive receptors be exposed to health risks in excess of the significance criteria discussed above. If the installation of new generators results in multiple - generator groups, the installation would also be required to comply with recently promulgated Rule 1472 to ensure that localized risk remains below thresholds. Compliance with Rule 1472, if applicable, together with the limited need for, and operational hours of, this equipment would substantially reduce potential impacts. Impacts would therefore be less than significant. Because the project would not introduce any substantial stationary sources of on -site TAC emissions, diesel particulate matter (DPM) from idling vehicles poses the greatest potential of creating an incremental increase in TAC emissions during operation of the proposed project. In 2004, CARB adopted an Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) to limit heavy duty diesel motor vehicle idling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel PM and other TACs and air pollutants. The measure applies to diesel - fueled commercial vehicles with gross vehicle weight ratings greater than 10,000 pounds which are licensed to operate on highways, regardless of where they are registered. This measure does not allow diesel fueled commercial vehicles to idle for more than five minutes at any given time. Potential localized air toxic impacts from on -site sources of diesel particulate emissions would be minimal since only a limited number of heavy -duty trucks would access the project site (deliveries, trash removal, etc.), and the trucks that do visit the site would not idle on the project site for extended periods of time. Based on the limited activity of the toxic air contaminant sources to be operated with implementation of the proposed Project, a detailed health risk assessment is not warranted. Potential air toxic impacts to off -site populations would be less than significant. As mentioned previously, the CARB has released guidelines which provide recommendations regarding the siting of new sensitive land uses near potential sources of air toxic emissions (e.g., freeways, distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, chrome plating facilities, dry cleaners, and gasoline dispensing facilities). Based on our understanding of existing nearby land uses, new sensitive receptors (future residents) should not be sited within 1,000 feet of a warehouse distribution center (which have extensive heavy -duty truck activity), within 500 feet of a freeway [or similar high traffic roadway (i.e., roads within urbanized areas carrying more than 100,000 vehicles per day)], or within 300 feet of a dry cleaning facility that uses perchloroethylene, among C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx other siting recommendations. Since the Project would not introduce residential uses within the CARB siting distances for potential air toxic sources, the Project would result in a less than significant impact with regard to on -site TAC exposure and no mitigation is required. As described above, operation of the project would not result in substantial localized or regional air pollutant impacts. Therefore, the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. 3.e. No Impact: No objectionable odors are expected as a result from operation of the proposed project. Odors are typically associated with industrial projects involving use of chemicals, solvents, petroleum products, and other strong - smelling elements used in manufacturing processes. Odors are also associated with such uses as sewage treatment facilities and landfills. Standard practices related to trash receptacle areas, such as keeping trash bins covered and located away from outdoor areas where residents of multi - family housing may congregate, will help minimize the potential for odor nuisance complaints. Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the use of architectural coatings and solvents. SCAQMD Rule 1113 limits the amount of volatile organic compounds from architectural coatings and solvents. Via mandatory compliance with SCAQMD Rules, no construction activities or materials are proposed which would create objectionable odors. Therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Background The parcel is completely surrounded by multi - family residential, commercial and medical office land uses. Topography on the parcel surface is basically flat -lying and featureless, except for a 10 to 15 -foot high berm located along the south property line. The parcel appears to have been graded flat in the past. It is elevated ten to forty feet above the existing grade of Rancho California Road. Riverside County adopted the Western Riverside County Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) on June 17, 2003. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Biological Opinion in favor of adopting the MSHCP was released on June 22, 2004. The City of Temecula is a signatory to the MSHCP, and therefore, the project is required to comply with the MSHCP. Section 6.0 of the MSHCP identifies the local implementation measures. Section 6.1.6 details the County and Cities Obligations and corresponds with Section 13.2 of the Biological Opinion issued by the USFWS. The program requires the City to undertake the following steps to insure compliance with the requirements of the MSHCP: • Payment of local development mitigation fees and other relevant fees (Section 8.5) • Comply with the Habitat Assessment program (HANS) processor equivalent process to satisfy local acquisition obligation • Comply with the survey requirements (Section 6.3.2) C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx • Comply with the policies of the Riparian /Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools (Section 6.1.2) • Comply with the policies of the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species (Section 6.1.3) • Comply with the policies of the UrbanNVildlands Interface (Section 6.1.4) • Comply with the Best Management Practices (Section 7.0; Appendix C) Comments: 4.a. -f. Less than Significant Impact: The project site is in the Southwest Area Plan of the MSHCP. The project site is not within a Criteria Cell of the MSHCP Plan Area and no HANS review is required; however a habitat assessment was required to address, at a minimum, the potential habitat for Burrowing Owl in accordance with MSHCP guidelines. A letter dated January 22, 2007 from Consulting Biologists Principe and Associates, along with an MSHCP Compliance Report and Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment conducted by Principe and Associates on June 12, 2007, indicate that suitable habitat for the burrowing owl was not found on site; nor is the site suitable to support habitat for the burrowing owl. An updated Burrowing Owl survey was conducted on August 12, 2010 by the consulting biologists Principe and Associates. The results of the survey indicate that Burrowing Owl habitat is still not present on the site or within the 500 feet buffer zone. Burrowing owls were also not observed on the site or within the buffer zone. The applicant will be required to pay applicable MSHCP mitigation fees. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The project site does not contain any wetlands, riparian forests, vernal pools, or wildlife nursery sites. There are no natural watercourses on the parcel surface. The parcel is mostly bare ground with no significant biological resources present on site. There are some cottonwood trees on the project site, however, they are not considered sensitive habitat, nor is the site a part of a wildlife corridor. The site is located within the Quino Checker spot and Gnatcatcher as well as Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. Habitat Conservation fees will be required as a condition of approval to offset the effect of cumulative impacts to the species from urbanization occurring throughout western Riverside County. The MSHCP does not have any further habitat assessment requirements for the project site, so no additional wildlife or plants surveys are necessary. No significant impacts are expected. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? X c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: 5.a.b.d. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: A Historical - Archaeological Resources Survey Report was conducted by CRM Tech dated February 2, 2007 for the Rancho View Development. This development was to be constructed on the parcel as the proposed project. On January 23, 2007, an archaeologist carried out an intensive - level, pedestrian field survey of the project area with the assistance of Native American monitors from the Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians. The intensive -level field survey produced completely negative results for potential cultural resources and no artifacts more than 50 years of age were encountered during the survey. Furthermore, the City of Temecula General Plan does not identify the project site as a sensitive archaeological resource area. In addition, archaeological monitoring was conducted during all grading activities on the 20.5 acre property located adjacent /east of this project site (Temecula Ridge Apartments) and, according to the Archaeological Report for the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Temecula Ridge Apartment Project prepared by Eilar Associates dated May 8, 2006, only one artifact was found (a prehistoric lithic artifact) which was considered not significant due to the lack of associated deposits. No further cultural resources were identified during the archaeological monitoring. Due to the lack of historical and archaeological resources found during the archaeological monitoring during grading at the adjacent site; and the negative findings for potential cultural resources conducted during a survey of the project site, less than significant impacts are expected. However, in order to ensure that significant impacts will not result, the project will be conditioned consistent with City policy and the recommendations set forth in the Historical - Archaeological Resources Survey dated February 2, 2007 that if, during excavation /grading or construction of the site, any artifacts or other objects that reasonably appear to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, including human remains, all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area is to cease immediately and a qualified specialist shall inspect the site to determine the significance of the discovery. Mitigation for the project will be as follows: Mitigation: 1 Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor and professional Pechanga Tribe monitor to monitor all ground- disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. 2 At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 3 Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre - grading report with the City (if required) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity observation. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in MM 2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the appropriate Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities in consultation with the project archaeologist. 4 If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in MM 2. 5 The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. 6 All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. 7 If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological /cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and /or City Council. 5.c. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: The City of Temecula General Plan EIR sensitivity map for paleontological resources identifies the project site as an area having possible paleontological resources. In addition, paleontological monitoring conducted during grading activities on the 20.5 acre property located adjacent /east of this project site (Temecula Ridge Apartments) revealed at least 32 discoveries of vertebrate fossils dating from 300,000 years to 1.8 million years old (all of which have been deposited into the permanent paleontological collections at the San Diego Natural History Museum), according to the Paleontological Report for the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Temecula Ridge Apartment Project prepared by Eilar Associates dated May 8, 2006. Due to the potential for such resources to occur on the property, a paleontological assessment will be required prior to grading operations, and during grading and excavation activities a qualified paleontological monitor will be required to be present on site and shall have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any exposed paleontological resources. If paleontological resources are encountered, adequate funding shall be provided to collect, curate and report on these resources to ensure the values inherent in the resources are adequately characterized and preserved. With these measures, potentially significant impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx Mitigation: 1 A paleontological assessment will be required prior to grading operations. 2 A qualified Paleontologist shall be on -site during grading activities. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 - 1 - B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Comments: 6.a. Less Than Significant Impact: According to the City's General Plan El R, the site is not located within an Earthquake Fault Hazard Zone. The Geotechnical Investigation of the site, prepared by GeoCon Inland Empire, Inc. on February 12, 2007, indicates that no active faults are known to project through the site and the site does not lie within the Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. However, the Elsinore Fault is located approximately one - quarter mile to site. There are 20 nearby or regional faults within a 50 -mile radius from the site, and the site could be subjected to moderate or severe ground shaking in the event of an earthquake at any nearby or regional earthquake fault. As a standard condition of approval, the applicant is required to build the structures in accordance with the current UBC seismic codes and local ordinances. The project site is not located within an area subject to liquefaction according to the City of Temecula's current GIS mapping information. Furthermore, according to the Geotechnical Investigation prepared by GeoCon Inland Empire on February 12, 2007, the potential for liquefaction at the site is considered to be very low based on the relatively dense nature of the formation soil. In addition, no soil or geologic conditions were encountered at the site which would preclude the proposed commercial development of the property, provided compliance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation Report. Development of the property is considered feasible and less than significant impacts are anticipated for the project. 6.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The General Plan requires mitigation for projects to control erosion. Further, the state -wide NPDES program requires every project with ground disturbance greater than five acres to implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during project construction and operation. Best Management Practices (BMPs) are identified in the SWPPP to control erosion on a site and any sedimentation generated by disturbing the site for development with conformance to the NPDES program. Less than significant impacts are expected. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 6.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project is not located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of this project, and potentially result in on or off -site grading landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. In general, the on -site soil consists of sands with variable amounts of silt and silts with variable amounts of sand. The soil generally possesses a very low to low expansion index as defined by the Uniform Building Code Section 18 -i -B and moderate shear strength characteristics. The on -site soil is considered suitable for use as fill. It is recommended that soil with an expansion potential greater than medium (El > 50), if encountered, be kept at least three feet below proposed finished grade. In addition, no soil or geologic conditions were encountered which would preclude the proposed commercial development of the property, provided compliance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation Report. In addition, the applicant will be required to prepare soils reports prior to issuance of a grading permit. Development of the property is considered feasible and less than significant impacts are anticipated for the project. 6.e. No Impact: The project will not utilize septic tanks, but will instead be connected to the public sewer system. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than SignificantWith Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Comments: 7.a. Less Than Significant Impact: A Green House Gas study was conducted by PCR Services Corporation in March of 2011. The report analyzed green house gas emissions from both construction and operational circumstances. Construction Emissions of GHGs were calculated for each year of project construction. Construction of the project is projected to emit a total of 945 metric tons (MT) of CO2e. Results of this analysis are presented in Table 1, Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Due to the potential persistence of GHGs in the environment, impacts are based on annual emissions and, in accordance with SCAQMD methodology, construction - period impacts are not assessed independent of operational - period impacts. Operations Construction Construction (Total) 945 Construction (Amortized) 31 Operations On Road Mobile Sourcesa 487 Electricityb 184 Natural Gasc 94 Water Conveyance 165 Operations Total 930 Project Total f 961 • Mobile source emissions are based on an average trip length of 13.3 miles for workers and 8.9 miles for customers, and fleet percentages provided by URBEMiS 2007. Mobile source values were derived using EMFAC2007. • Electricity Usage Rates from the Energy information Administration's 003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey. • Natural gas emissions are derived from URBEMIS2007. Water Conveyance Calculations are based on factors derived from the California Energy Commission, and calculations are part of the electricity calculations in the Appendix. ! Future Scenario includes VMT reductions due to GHG reducing project features. J amortized construction plus annual operations Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2011. C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007837.docx Table 1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (metric tons) Source Emissions Project operations would result in a change in land use from vacant land to residential use. As shown in Table 1, GHG emissions resulting from vehicle, electrical, and natural gas usage during operation is estimated to be 930 MT CO2e, including the savings in natural resource consumption due to the project design features. When added with the amortized emissions from construction, the total project -level emissions from the proposed project was estimated to be a maximum of 961 MT CO2e, which is less than the SCAQMD significance threshold of 3,000 tons per year. With regard to the first CEQA checklist question, the GHG emissions resulting from project construction and operations would not directly or indirectly have a significant impact on the environment based on the above mentioned threshold. Therefore, the project would result in a less than significant impact with regard to construction and operational GHG emissions. 7.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Temecula has established a Sustainability Action Plan which encourages the reduction of GHG emissions from new projects and existing operations . This plan is based on the United Nations Urban Environmental Accords, and is generally supportive of the goals of AB32. Specifically applicable to the proposed project are: • Community wide energy usage reduction target of 10% more efficient than current standards. • Promote alternative modes of transportation As highlighted above, one of the project design features is to lessen energy used in the buildings and the residents' reliance on personal automobiles. To these goals, the applicant is committed to installing a state -of- the art heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system which will provide domestic hot water, heating and cooling with approximately 20 percent less energy consumed. In addition, the center will promote alternative modes of transportation by providing a shuttle bus and driver in which the residents will be transported off -site for routine needs such as shopping, health needs, and entertainment. Based on similar facilities, it is expected that less than 10 residents will own and use a personal vehicle while residing at Highgate. In addition, vehicle trips for the overall project would be reduced with the transportation shuttle services provided. In addition, the project would be subject to the mandatory CalGreen requirements which will serve to further reduce GHG emissions. In November 2008, the California Building Standards Commission established the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) which sets performance standards for residential and nonresidential development to reduce environmental impacts and encourage sustainable construction practices. When the CALGreen code went into effect in 2009, compliance through 2010 was voluntary. As of January 1, 2011, the CALGreen code is mandatory for all new buildings constructed in the State. The CalGreen code addresses energy efficiency, water conservation, material conservation, planning and design, and overall environmental quality. Therefore, the project will comply with CALGreen requirements. Because the proposed project is supportive of local and State goals regarding global climate change, and does not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation for reducing GHG emissions, no impacts are anticipated and no mitigation measures are necessary. Due to the complex physical, chemical and atmospheric mechanisms involved in global climate change, there is no basis for concluding that the project's very small theoretical emissions increase could actually cause a measurable increase in global GHG emissions necessary to force global climate change. The GHG emissions of the project alone cannot cause a direct physical change in the environment. It is global emissions in their aggregate that contribute to climate change, not any one source of emissions alone. Due to the incremental amount of GHG emissions estimated for this project, the lack of any evidence for concluding that the project's GHG emissions could cause any measurable increase in global GHG emissions necessary to force global climate change, and the fact that the project incorporates design features to reduce potential GHG emissions that are consistent with the goals of AB32, the project is not considered to have a significant impact with respect to global climate change on a project- specific basis. Moreover, there is no non - speculative method for C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx assessing how the project's very small theoretical GHG emissions increase could cause a significant project - specific effect on global climate change. Construction and operation of the project would create an increase of GHG emissions but would remain below SCAQMD thresholds. In addition, the project will consider incorporating the project features described above which will result in lower GHG emission rates as compared to "business as usual ". Because these features and measures would meaningfully reduce project GHG emissions and are consistent with the Temecula Sustainability Action Plan and State's CAT strategies, the Project is supportive of the State's goals regarding global climate change. Therefore, the Project is anticipated to result in a less than significant impact to cumulative Global Climate Change. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Comments: 8.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is designated for a congregate care facility, which may include medical and biological waste. Therefore, the project may include hazardous materials. However, chemicals and waste stored, used, and handled at facilities are required to ensure that proper types of fire and life safety protection systems and procedures are in place. All businesses that plan to use hazardous materials will be required to submit a chemical classification packet to the City as required by the California Fire Code and California Building Code for compliance with these requirements. There will be no significant hazard to the public or the environment from the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result from this project. 8.b. Less Than Significant Impact: It is not anticipated that the project would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The project proposes a congregate care facility. Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 8.c. No Impact: The proposed project does not include any activities or uses that would pose a potential health hazard to the local population or the nearby school. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 8.d No Impact: Review of available data including site appearance, California Department of Toxic Substance Control's (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and Substances Site Lists, and the Preliminary Title Report indicate no past uses that may have involved hazardous materials. Based upon the available data and the historical land use, there is no evidence to support that hazardous wastes would be present on the site. No impacts are anticipated. 8.e.f. No Impact: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public or private airstrip according to Figure LU -2 in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. No impact upon airport uses will result from this proposal. 8.g. No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area and is not a portion of an emergency response or evacuation plan and will be designed to allow for adequate emergency vehicle access to the site. Therefore, the project would not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8.h. No Impact: The proposed project is not located in or near a wildland area that would be subject to fire hazards. The location of the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. No impact is anticipated as a result of this project. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? X d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? X e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f Require the preparation of a project- specific WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The project proposes a congregate care facility totaling 97,685 square feet. This type of development typically generates domestic and /or municipal wastewater that does not require pretreatment or waste discharge requirements. No water quality standards are forecast to be violated by implementing the proposed project which will deliver its wastewater flows to the regional wastewater plant. Wastewater will be delivered to the regional treatment plant for treatment under waste discharge requirements established by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. During construction and occupancy, Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented which will control storm water runoff pollution to a level of no significance, therefore less than significant impacts are anticipated. 9.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Groundwater related problems are not expected to be encountered during site development. If shallow perched groundwater is encountered during construction, it can be managed with the use of sump pumps placed in the bottom of excavations which will be incorporated. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx The proposed project does not include any extraction of groundwater, so no adverse direct impact can result from implementing the proposed project. The City's General Plan EIR addresses water demand from development in the City of Temecula. The General Plan EIR concludes that cumulative water demand within the City can be met by the City's two purveyors without having a significant adverse impact on the environment, including depletion of the areas groundwater supplies. This is verified by the Rancho California Water District's Urban Water Master Plan which defines the resources available to the District to meet future cumulative demand within its service area. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan designation for the property and thus, is considered consistent with the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the proposed project will not contribute to a significant cumulative, indirect adverse impact on the area groundwater aquifers. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 9.c. Less Than Significant Impact: Through the implementation of the project SWPPP (storm water protection program), erosion and siltation issues are controlled to a less than significant impact level and this project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off -site. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 9.d.f. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would increase runoff as a result of increasing the impervious surface on the project site. The City imposes standard mitigation to detain surface runoff on the property to ensure that the maximum runoff volume from the site is not significantly increased. The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements established by the State of California. However, the project is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (VVQMP) pursuant to the Municipal Separate Storm -Sewer permit (MS4 permit) issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. A preliminary plan has been submitted and conceptually accepted. The project will comply with RWQCB standards as designed. Based upon the information presented above, no significant adverse impact to either downstream flows or water quality is forecast to affect properties downstream of the site from developing the project as proposed. Less than significant impacts are proposed. 9.g.h. Less Than Significant Impact: No buildings or structures will be located within the 100 -year floodplain according to the City's General Plan as a result of implementing this project. No significant flood hazards are expected to occur from developing the project site as proposed. No significant flood hazards are expected to occur from developing the project site as proposed. Less that significant impacts are proposed. 9.i. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. The subject property is not located within a dam inundation area per the City's General Plan. In addition, the City has implemented a multi- hazard functional plan pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act. The proposed project does not contain critical or essential facilities. Less than significant impacts are proposed. 9.j. No Impact: Due to the project area's distance from the ocean or other large body of water and its and elevation, there is no potential for a tsunami. The project area is not located near a large surface water body and there is no potential for inundation by seiche or mudflow. No impacts are anticipated. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Physically divide an established community? X b Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Comments: 10.a.b. No Impact: The project site will not divide the physical arrangement of an established community. Surrounding property uses include commercial, office and multi - family apartment residential so the addition of a congregate care use will not divide an established community. The proposed site is zoned Professional Office (PO) and allows for congregate care uses. The project is consistent with the zoning standards of the City's General Plan and Development Code. Impacts from all General Plan Land Use designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City comments on the scope of the analysis contained with the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular agency. Furthermore, all agencies with jurisdiction over the project are being given the opportunity to comment on the project, and it is anticipated that they will make the appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific environmental plans or policies. No impacts are anticipated from this project. 10.c. No Impact: The project site is not located within a Criteria Cell of the Western Riverside County MSHCP and is consistent with the applicable Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan. There will be no conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conversation plan related to this project. No impact is expected. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Comments: 11.a. No Impact: The project will not result in the loss of the availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and residents of the state. According to the General Plan El R, the City is within Mineral Resource Zone 3a (MRZ -3) as classified by the State Geologist. The MRZ -3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and graval for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant economic value, based on available data. These areas are primarily located in proximity to the Murrieta and Temecula Creeks, as well as other significant drainage areas. The project site is not located in the vicinity of these areas. No impacts are anticipated; therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 11.b. No Impact: The project will not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan. Please reference Response No. 11.a. No impacts are anticipated; therefore, no mitigation measures are required. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Comments: 12.a. -d. Less than Significant Impact: Development of the land will result in increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long -term. No activities are anticipated within the proposed project that would expose persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. The project will create some noise levels over that currently emanating from the project site. However, those noises are not anticipated to create a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. The project may result in temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels during construction. Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet, which is considered annoying. However, noise from construction of the project will comply with City ordinances regulating the hours of activity to Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No significant impacts are anticipated. 12.e.f. No Impact: This project is not within two miles of a public airport or public or private use airport. According to Figure N -3 (the French Valley Airport Future Noise Contours in the Noise Element) on page N -12 of the General Plan, the project is not located in the noise impact area for the French Valley Airport. In addition, the project is not located in the French Valley Airport Land Use Compatibility Zone according to Figure LU -2 on page LU -7 of the Land Use and Planning Element of the General Plan. Therefore, people within the project area will not be exposed to excessive noise levels generated by an airport and no impacts will result from this project. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: 13.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The project proposes a congregate care facility that could attract people that live outside City limits to relocate to Temecula. This is considered a moderate direct affect due to the fact that the facility only has 99 units. The project will not induce substantial growth beyond what is projected in the City's General Plan. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13.b.c. No Impact: The project will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, as the site is vacant property and is not zoned for residential uses. Therefore, the project will not necessitate the construction of replacement housing due to displacement of housing or people. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a Fire protection? X b Police protection? X c Schools? X d Parks? X e Other public facilities? X Comments: 14.a.b.d.e. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The development of the site will incrementally increase the need for these services. The project will also contribute its fair share through the City's Development Impact Fees to the maintenance or provision of services from these entities. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 14.c. No Impact: The project is creating a residential use. However, the use will provide housing for senior citizens and not school age children. Therefore the use will not have impacts on, or result in a need for new or altered school facilities. Development of the parcels within the project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City. The cumulative effect from the project will be mitigated through the payment of applicable school fees at the time the parcels are developed. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 15. RECREATION. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 15.a.b. No Impacts: The project will have no impact on the demand for neighborhood, regional parks or other recreational facilities, or affect existing recreational opportunities. The project has proposed recreational areas for its residents. However these are not available to the public since the use is designated as a congregate care facility. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 16. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? X b Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e Result in inadequate emergency access? X f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Comments: 16.a.b. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project is located at the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga, with ingress and egress at the south and east side of the property line along Via Las Colinas. There will be an increase in vehicle trips on adjacent streets once the proposed project is developed. However, the Statement of Operations for the project indicates that van service will be available to residents. This van service will reduce the overall vehicle trips created by the facility. The City's Public Works Department has indicated that the project will have a less than significant impact to the existing road system and adjacent intersections because the existing roadways have been developed consistent with the City's General Plan in anticipation of the area's proposed development. In addition, the City's Public Works Department noted that the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates dated February 18, 2000 for the adjacent commercial and residential project, Temecula Ridge Village, included this property as well and all required mitigation has been implemented including the southerly extension of Moraga Road and a traffic signal upgrade at the intersection of Moraga and Rancho California Road. A focused traffic study dated September 21, 2010 specific to the project was prepared by Urban Crossroads. Several mitigation measures were developed as part of the study. These are listed below and will be included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx Mitigation: 1. Construct the driveway on Moraga Road (Drive way 1) as a Full access driveway with stop control. 2. Construct the driveway on Via Las Colinas (Driveway 2) as a full access driveway with stop control. 3. Sight distance at each project access point should be reviewed with respect to standard Caltrans /City of Temecula sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans. 4. Traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project site. Congregate care facilities are a permitted use within Professional Office (PO) zones. No conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system is anticipated. A less than significant impact is expected. 16.c. No Impact: The proposed project will not have an impact on the air traffic patterns and will not result in a substantial safety risk. This site is not within the French Valley Airport influence area. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 16.d.e.f. No Impact: The proposed project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards. The proposed project provides for adequate ingress and egress from the site. The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed project and have determined that adequate emergency access has been provided. In addition, on- site circulation has been reviewed using the emergency vehicle turning radius templates and it has been determined that on -site circulation is adequate for emergency vehicles. The proposed project will meet parking requirements per Chapter 17.24 of the Temecula Development Code. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 17.a.b.e. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 17.c. Less than Significant Impact: The project may result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities on site that will connect to the existing system currently in place along Rancho California Road and to an existing City of Temecula storm drain located both east and west of the project site. Construction of any storm drains will comply with the General Plan. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 17.d. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor require expanded water entitlements. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "RCWD anticipates supplying water to 167,640 persons within its service area in 2020 (p. 5.14 -3)." The FEIR further states: "EMWD anticipates supplying water to 756,699 persons within its service area in 2020, (p. 5.14 -3)." This anticipated water supply includes a portion of Temecula. Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 17.f.g. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: 18.a. Less than Significant Impact: This site is surrounded by development and does not contain any viable habitat for fish or wildlife species. This is an in -fill development and it does not have the potential to: degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 18.b. Less than Significant Impact: The effects from this project are less than significant with Mitigation Measures incorporated into the project. All cumulative effects for the subject site, as well as the surrounding developments, were analyzed in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. With the mitigation measures in place, the project will be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The cumulative impacts related to the future development of this site are anticipated to have a less than significant impact. 18.c. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The residential project will be designed and developed consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11007837.docx 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. Comments 19.a. The City's General Plan and Final Environment Impact Report were used as a referenced source in preparing this Initial Study. Earlier documents developed by consultants can be found in the below Sources section. These documents are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. 19.b. A previous initial study was conducted for the project site in relation to a different development (Rancho View Professional Center). This development consisted of two office buildings totaling 85,000 square feet. However, it was never constructed. All items discussed above, with the exception of air quality and traffic, were within the scope of the proposed congregate care facility. Separate air quality /green house gas and traffic studies were conducted specifically for the congregate care facility. 19.c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. MSHCP Compliance Report and Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment prepared by Principe and Associates (June 20, 2007) 5. Updated Burrowing Owl Assessment prepared by Principe and Associates (September 8, 2010) 6. Historical /Archaeological Resources Survey Report prepared by CRM TECH (February 2, 2007) 7. Paleontological Report for the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Temecula Ridge Apartment Project prepared by Eilar Associates (May 8, 2006) 8. Archaeological Report for the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Temecula Ridge Apartment Project prepared by Eilar Associates (May 8, 2006) 9. Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Geocon (February 12, 2007) 10. Revised Traffic Impact Analysis for Temecula Village Development prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates (February 18, 2000) 11. Traffic Study prepared by Urban Crossroads dated September 21, 2010. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007837.docx Project Description: Location: Applicant: General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Monitoring Program A two phase Development Plan Application for a three story 97,685 square foot senior congregate care facility generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road. The project features 99 units consisting of studio, one bedroom, and two bedroom apartments as well as a courtyard Generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road Larry Markham 41635 Enterprise Circle North Temecula, CA 92590 Cultural Resources C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007838.doc Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? 1. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor and professional Pechanga Tribe monitor to monitor all ground- disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. 2. At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. 3. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre - grading report with the City (if required) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity observation. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in MM 2, the archaeological monitors authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the appropriate Tribe in order to evaluate C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007838.doc the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities in consultation with the project archaeologist. 4. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in MM 2. 5. The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. 6. All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. 7 If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/ cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, Specific Process: Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department General Impact: the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and/or City Council. 8. A paleontological assessment will be required prior to grading operations. 9. A qualified Paleontologist shall be on -site during grading activities. Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the project to reduce potential biological impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Milestone: Above referenced mitigation measures shall be placed on all applicable project plans. Transportation/Traffic Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Mitigation Measures: 10. Construct the driveway on Moraga Road (Drive way 1) as a Full access driveway with stop control. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007838.doc 11. Construct the driveway on Via Las Colinas (Driveway 2) as a full access driveway with stop control. 12. Sight distance at each project access point should be reviewed with respect to standard Caltrans /City of Temecula sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans. 13. Traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project site. Specific Process: Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the project to reduce potential transportation /traffic impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Milestone: Above referenced mitigation measures shall completed before any grading permit is issued. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department and Public Works Department C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp11007838.doc Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below PA10 -0309 C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007839.doc Larry Markham, MDMG, Inc. on Behalf of Buron Inc. A Development Plan Application for a two-story, 89,148 square foot senior congregate care facility featuring 94 units consisting of studio and one bedroom units generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project will not have a significant impact upon the environment based upon a completed Environmental Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. As a result, a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be adopted in compliance with CEQA. Eric Jones, (951) 506 -5115 City of Temecula, Council Chambers July 20, 2011 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at (951) 506 -5115. DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Lot Area: Total Floor Area /Ratio: N/A Landscape Area /Coverage: N/A Parking Required /Provided: N/A STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION July 20, 2011 Eric Jones, Case Planner Planning Application No. PA11 -0069, a Wireless Telecommunications Facility Application to allow a cellular facility disguised as a street light to be located within the public right -of -way, generally located on Pechanga Parkway directly across from Via Gilberto Approve with Conditions Categorically Exempt Section 15303, Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures James Rogers on behalf of T- Mobile West Corporation City of Temecula right -of -way City of Temecula right -of -way Site: Existing Sidewalk, Landscaping /City of Temecula right -of -way North: Existing Sidewalk, Landscaping /City of Temecula right -of -way South: Existing Sidewalk, Landscaping /City of Temecula right -of -way East: Open Space, Existing Residential /Open Space (OS), Low Medium (LM) Residential West: Pechanga Parkway, Existing Residential /Low Medium (LM) Residential Existinq /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY On March 17, 2011, James Rogers, on behalf of T- Mobile West Corporation, submitted Planning Application PA11 -0069. The application will allow a telecommunication facility disguised as a street light to be placed within the public right -of -way along Pechanga Parkway. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The applicant is proposing to construct a 35 -foot telecommunication antenna disguised as a street light pole. The proposed antenna will match neighboring street lights with the exception of a five -foot RF transparent canister painted to match the light pole. The antenna will be located on the east side of Pechanga Parkway within the public right -of -way approximately 1,900 feet north of Wolf Valley Road. The array will consist of three antennas. Support equipment for the site will be installed within an underground vault adjacent to the proposed street light pole. The nearest residential unit is located approximately 170 feet to the east. The applicant is requesting the new wireless facility in order to achieve consistent service to customers. The City is currently processing a total of 39 right -of -way telecommunication sites for New Path Networks. These facilities will also be disguised as street light poles. The nearest of these facilities relative to the project site is approximately 1.25 miles to the northeast. This distance makes co- location with a New Path Facility infeasible. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on July 7, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). The project consists of the installation of a 35 -foot street light pole with antennas for wireless telecommunications. Support equipment will be placed within an underground vault. The project is in an urbanized area and will not impact any existing structures. The project and surrounding area has already been developed and is thus not environmentally sensitive, FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.04.010.E) The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The proposed use requires a minimal amount of servicing, which will create little traffic, The proposed use is consistent with and meets all the requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance, The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. By designing the antenna to resemble existing street light poles, the proposed project is designed to integrate with the existing streetscape. In addition, the nearest residential structure to the antenna is located approximately 170 feet to the east. The use is determined to be compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures. Furthermore, the conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The project meets the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code. As a result, the proposed conditional use meets the requirements of the Development Code. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Support equipment will be housed underground and will thus not be accessible by unauthorized persons, The project has been reviewed and appropriately conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the application for a Conditional Use Permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing PROJECT INFORMATION 7040 AC M1ITRN.S 1 or 09(09400 421 7•7■1 E0 ♦ K[JMORACC 4779 1140 CUR.TEM EOICOS or NE FOLLOA70 JOGS AS AORIEE0 07 WE LOCO 6DVLe74w A31PUR17* JIWM; 04 1NLS.. 4141 > 14 ML 0160(140 10 Pi41Al MOO( HO) CON=7101C ID 114( MT(51 0017O4S OF 71( 0 .."4'940 00015 2007 130940940 577900105 000R5001)0. 000E 270" 47.-4.0142 00(0750 000E (001 ;. 2007 C00 8 0001(0CAL COOS (O/C) 2007 150800.1* 4007.1 070L. 2077 CALM0PA0 MCC.A(AL CCOE (CYO) 2007 CA.704090 FLDV4INC 0001 .0'C) 07454/0•-223 -1 Eft 5721.77 00)0 10 4101 LIRAL 7920•4 COW. CITY /CORRY 0RO9MIOES 411 ACC S0 000•4461 •41/•901 • UA CLOWN; (CULCULA. CA 02592 510 8 94.1 00R09AOL /CAD 9401 20, 14151 FLOOR •■•■•••0. CA 9116) COVIACI• R03R1 1(944. / 91124 (026) 043 -4708 ,M1bOCTOR OCCIFWOY CLA5971CAIOS 7710 OE GOMS1RU070N ZOOM: IOIAL PR0(C7 MCA (7r. Or 10 4(044 0- U17)M0 RAMA 30 5 VOA' CR1[• SPEC1'i RAH 41 50 rr 4070749095 799441( 70700(94 04111.0[ -74Y um00E 3107746 .04000400' 41706'34,20V EuyA7[Nt 747219 EM R 5CE 9062. (60 990 7706 R0'N7. (606( 1429 -4466 finsaxismenatt O.S ERCOOSO. 109 uir ESSIME4710M 0 7 -79007.0 (6114.11179? 441774 A 0 -0 13' -5 849010070/44 (01090190 44114 24E47047•1 10 1 40 50549 SS -0 3097 0004 •11. 0107 94 MOR106 0' (3) PAWL M700LS (I 401 •001407) VON( • 014 M PROVO) 4107014 61790.0 30 A P00907410 57.-0 - ”00 C111 POE SHEET INDEX A•CWTECTIRM 4722 26010 MO) Str. 9471 ?CO • M 14479 77074: OtC CAW 10 94�W: Om FM .665i M •111) .12-640 it FZa1M1 (CAW M. PROJECT DIRECTORY 880990 R51 Comm WC() 1157 04511 PJ O, 5271 200 0710090 13 17 741 e 10.0•1 AWACE• 7 30 10 510201 02x9: 3.610,410 00.80074 ' W.C1108 SW£4•SCA T • •Mobile»® IE04714H SCE LIGHT POLE LIGHT POLE SCE POLE ID #4523516E PECHANGA PARKWAY @ VIA GILBERTO TE M EC U LA, CA 92592 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1 - ) (IRE. SHEET 1S -1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A- I OVERATE S11C PLAN 4 -2 [x157306 4TE MAN A- - 2.1 PROPOSED 511E PLAN 4 -3 PROPOSED AND EKIST04G HORIN•ESr ELEVATORS A -3 I PROPOSED AND EXISTING SOOT14405T LEV /A(10NS 0 -4 POLE AND 401117.7.4 YOUNT 0112015 01•02. ▪ RAM {90 )4 5019 CMS 0040710 (404) 015 2931 .02407 13411V (409' 925 -3662 001045 049400 (4661 234 -9097 070 *173509 (909) 210 -4763 11:47 VA SRO. 07 3057 1770 00 92910 130 .M 901045 2.0.10 (SO O5 -3051 Of 37. -3973 C 214 ulA APPROVALS BLOCK 0f 70.000000 PMIES HEMP AW•OL A9D 0001 0[51 20000(075 MM 21/I140102E 111E CONIMCIOR 10 P40C(70 4701 790 1365 CRSCR0ED HERO( ALL CCHSTRECTICH SOCUVENIS ME 0.04(11 TO 9( 09 0' TM 0 LOCAL 000790 OC•Ai1V077 A140 7.4 SMOG: MO .1 000504111016 IHEV MO &POSE EEC /OWE' 2O0I4O 400. 0044110 NWC• OFVH OP 00H 0 474RD NAVE: 9'7:M111RET COH 1 Cif 11A91HU 779/01 PRO:[CT 44(0 PMNICO MVO: 44.1441 sm. 1.1151:4.../108. PROWS HMO: RF Fl/: NEC, P•NTL0 HAW: SCMI■RE; W, WINDERS 5l*.. 5x DISIE SYMBOLS LIST Rom worm OM Kw!. wetO M1fo1.u0a CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Vvl 701 0400mee 0vlu0e 1 -460.0 949021 P$'* 1104.. DRIVING DIRECTIONS dl✓/M1 Il W. 01. to :12. CO M17 00 (7.1070 •E57) IVR4 LEFT TO 5744 09 C 6 PO - 700.0 l(/1 (40/110 CVO M 044514 AVC - 0400 KA109 (RCN; 0•70 7 -70 (140 0012V.4OM1 EAR) • ZAIRE RAPE (IOC) 0910 7 -15 0V440 4901 - RC YOt11A1O2 [COUP 4204* 4044 MC WACO (W) (.00 1. 2009 - 790907009 20. 20010) - TWO 77017 0 N••• - Iv90. till (1411) 0910 147 -74 - '01 7411 ``WOW MC CM 516 0(0-0(FA PAM) •• • 2110 VA 210910. 7114014 04 92592 4 47 r 177 o i �ITe e".\ ,4 9r `< 10 a6 o " 0 \ \ � VICINITY MAP .. j 17 I � e n �� 2J - 0 ,0/10 t N. 4 j , I 4 . / Y 1 s PP 4' PL PPrP.1.0rErrF.R T • •Mobile: Stick Together' K HSI 1111 1 cwNl ROO 9211 100 0N7AMO. 10 1174) PRO)7C1 ;to OR2ArAA1r= 1[04/1411 SIX LIGHT POLE SCE U004 POEC 10,(45235' 6E PECHANGA PARKWAY 0 N.V. CRBERIO 1772r00( A. CA 02592 RIV1.00170 C0004 Y7 /10799407.1 K•IF OATF 03/10/2011 -ISSUED roo REV. ZONING SUBMITTAL =FV =TATF ENCPTPE10N IY. 31/72/0710 c�ly� p [5790 RCM(9 4787 19/04/1010 12/0 /2010 07 /.2/ WE 20 / 7 0 1 7 1492/ .Ji 7(.•'5 9.004 N940 FOR 470 ZOOG SW:0077. 6940 FM WV.. ZONY. Sean., 6940 701 In 1401.0 lTA 7 0 6 11 0 0004 APV• 94O 401 Iry ,OO .10 (72:: RC: TITLE SHEET • �SN( 79UU(4.,94 7 'V(SIS)1:, 2 209008 Vicinity Map LOT n CKAPllll: sllth x . n EIZCZEGIIMIS 1 ' - • f C uAN M aA RICWAY r u I..er .rr .- -• away Legal Description Assessor's Parcel No. say t r•.a•.•••r• wq m �]• rN .PA to-** 1 1 I I 1 1 I 11 1 1 OA ri-404' 1 .PM .18-1N r °H P'" I Am ..-20''° ° 1 I 1 I 1 I i I I 1 1 1 Title Report Easements m PIN nisi ns •• I* eat APA 4110-M'1'f elm/ caw" War LOT T 0 j 5s 9 1 11. . s , .4104 •mU 0 Lease Area Geographic Coordinates at Bilging light Pala .... . • t. � •4•nn .,r n.. : � 41, �:.HP r te; . ° • � .,P,,.••./- woofs" Maws 11 r r r . a.. 1 • 1 ■ L01 5 atial d _ MO !MAO 4116 pro ra so LOT 889939_, TRAM � .)ro'W q tr Y..a ,.L Warms • K • v'v N. Y. '7'71. ••• • •u •-•, • • =It ., 4044.• Y• wtM • IN Bests � w. Beartnos + .n.. s MUM/ uur .v. • Bench Mark rt1w.n- w.M4.•.wo.Y •..N. ti: Dates of Survey a V l7 cr« AR LOr_ 'M e1. 1 I T • -Mobile.. Stick Together' > WW1 1•400X. w6 1.00 vw .A.unn> ME ■, 1 ■ ■ U11 ■ ■.11 KDC 031R6PPM it la al= GAL VADA SUIIWVING. Inc. r. wra.a►IM, o..•.arwe 11.1111411.1111 .•ela•e• w•.1111awa maw elAr INN 1.••w R.�la a,r 1•A 1E0471414 PECHANGA PARKWAY Q VIA GILBERTO .ac$ANOA PI(Y. • VIA Oeeexro TIMIC(eA, CAMS! MPemme COUNrY •M�.IAt TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Ls- 1•11111.1 una nart maw m. , 114) 770 '1.193 -434 \ / 11 04 j 111 -ao \ 1RACI '719872 -2 44.4 4:4/13 -18 / ♦ i IN ((OW NE 0.U44 J S11Y RE510E( ) 7 / 7 / Lo' 4 x70 91. 202 .041 / / / 141 00 AP1 910 -)1) •001 Alk f: LOT 68 TRACT NO 19939 -1 U.8. 1/0/1 -4 6 0 - .(b Ott \ NEW: LT/ (:060 NED000 DENSITY NE5100031..1.0 Tcc or urn OVERALL SITE PLAN 0 20' 40' twu (=NOM 1'. )0 WT m1 it n: "e;e •41 LOT 16 TRACT N0. 293051 48 350/65 -78 W 110 x4 -021 (OV+NZ CI4048*) 0 PROPOSED PROJECT AREA SEE SPEC10)C 3 '2 (WOLF CREEK) URNNAGE 060(62EL1 100 4 1 1 KE.Y�4 NQTE� 1 O 1LSm0 I10< (1r7c*) oo»'na VAUSCNr coo L .1.41 cri>E1154o Lon P3LE (07104.) p 174E - `G (0*M ( ( (f -1.w( 4044. AoIC( O 1DS'K. LAM' 4 091 ((06JA) OLIr.'ct, WACM% (1370x) <>I 0 510•4 (M1*µ) <0>C1.6:+W COS (006 �t03'.Na COMM.* COMM01. vµ31 (070041 OCASINc 3(1[fµ rvA KW <> 055,4 ua40 VMA* 4 E2.4r•vc 10940 0600040 (1- 0091.E IRC0 P.60) 191'4) 1©7.1•010 11-001•2 0 .0.01 /CHIC Ww1a• 43>10386081 603. RECO 94X 01.980 1974 ®131010110 TACTIEE 11.6 PO401 MR W91 w - 1•2' =) (µ1164601 00401* 01060 /23 GYM'. 1t1*)/v ►01[15 MR0 110117* Oho - K. arms, 1745 (M100µ) 4,� 1•i 61011 ) 14x1 (rtv.t < -nc C01MSCAICO uC c>rrvoic uwaT1* 0'1.460 E»5'nC 0E0 04/1310 30x11(444 (1' -0' • t0' -0' Or VI) ®19g1p101 T -Y09L( (11009Cµ 11604 60 94 GENERAL NOTES I p+400f0100 Inn 10114 1 411104'1 11 .7 1 Mal/. I1f 4A% 1..117 IxrxrT 441406 005)439.) wwn4. a 1x4 wulcl4 21' -et 060. 114+0 4001. (x101 Kurt 7040• u.c 10 POOKSt0 1-1.000 Lot. 4 )e P 01 IK Co0,0 011 OS 0 0 vCT 7444(0 5 Lot* ) 0' - -1 a4L 0 ( 0 UTAL m µRiOMR w9CCM 1.41105 •Corso. W••o9 )DY -0'9) 1040 (0 40030M1 1901 AK *954021 ((4:0 0000514, Al 90(044 • (i 00 W r/a 0YD 0 21' -0'4 040.1 uGt CCU. 040 =VI 7391: (0100 000 .40610 00 (.4 100'0ae 9301, 1.(Y orr•Lo 70'.. Y.) 0 \ `WN7SPREVxVED -- rd?. T • •Mobile•• Stick Together' 2x0) L OAST 4310. SUM 200 04*41 CA 11061 .=PROJECT NFORMAI40 1E0471411 SCE LIGHT POLE SCE LICHT POLE. 0145235)60 PECx9WOA PARKWAY 0 (4A GILDERTO 1EWECUIP, CA 92592 RIVERSIDE c0UV(Y EURRINI M1'GUC DALE - 03/10/2011 r4)ED FOR. REV. ZONING SUBMITTAL 18(* OFCCRPEO A A 00/11 /1010 06/01 /aolo n /O4 /tam 12/21 /2x10 01 /31/•11 01 /10/X111 w .Lwn .34400 104 VAC= 'AVOW `SAO ran %V. 1.4 0EO1r4 S a ION Av. 2JxAC 949nr41 S11A0 IUI 14.4 71••■• 51a9r* Sk41■ «P wt. / 0401: 9..4vlrw 3(0 010 AC ,(4 C SPAWN 1010 (K 4744 3_C AR51 I E.1: PIM% PREPARED ON 409 ^ 4• • KDC A.OQECTW4GMQf. P.0 a* met (__ 1411001 1119111oC0199061 Mat 41509x2011 1111 40121//•40 0 NIEP • EXISTING SITE PLAN a 9 ,• WU IN NM WU IN 111170 noon. KEYED NOZ LIANA INC CTPC&) O COMA IMCX t OAS IIN' Lust. OPCU . NNI+OI MILK IfP4+) • cx6T.c N, T O 11.04 WWI 101.1 1010 MIU 10 O ROW IdWR 1 • Mann. 0.101 * cwma Mae" nu at NAM NNW WY • 10014 U0110RC MU 467K 000s MCA Ct604 11 •t• 500 .01 Pax •O a 0[YQSO LV4IM0 stun, of I MMO '0 a MNON] OWN COPONOWN COSI14 4ICIIt #& 10LS CnP CI:I Canna 110 N01W 1.0441 (. -1• • 10' -a• W' Sf1) =P06' PRE 16a. T • 'Mobile • Stick Together' 71670. 0.161t 100. 01. fi0 WAIN. Co NIA 1E04714H SCE LIGHT POLE SCE LICNT POLE 014523516E PECILWCA PARKWAY 0 NA G5DERTO TEMECULA, CA 97592 RNENS)36. COUNTY MONT 155(15 1}1Il 0 3/10/2 011 ISS1R 7 rOR REV. ZONING SU3MITTAL -MY •= (Tr —O 5C5IPnal — yr. L'1 A ai >n I: / /tea it/PI/WO up,polo 01/31/2511 ONN1 /1 1, CLAP owl tom; .i NI an .1 i r mutt Doe 100 NA10 NOnoll 1 =PC IOA *10 RNA 51011171. NACU MI 16v roles S..aunN 5:U1: Ip1 wr lCNNC SvmaNC MO 110 "DTUWR m - - PV • JEG I ARM I EX =P.N{S PREPARED fir 111 = IInNSLR0• KDC NLOMEECTS.OIGPIF 1 P.0 ANIMA WWI 1111 MONI:CA 11611 MAMA INC COMM* EXISTING SITE PLAN -5"U1 NUY9EEf. 6 Y,—: [ A-2 209008 1AI1003 / COAX 5060IIC .1030 33311310 E30313K / Y�1 1 3000 Waal COAT (0331 0030 1d 5136111 ^' 10• 11•0• M0•4114.601 4 40 2,1 a -0 '6 10 3/ -1' 1 1044.1711-301 1/P• 44-161 '1' x30 .P x:' 1 Mau .C110.P]N . 7/3' 301-5'1 O PROPOSED SITE PLAN ` � - 1 T01 A.Y U1i'.3 0009 la nnr Ali 1_01 I KEYED NOTES 1 '� • 00579] 000 (nvw) V 1050101 1315131 C6163 (11 • E*srK 009019.01 Cp.40. v40. (10304) • 035140 1011 0`' 001134 .6000710 1001 11063 On caw: 5011111 ('110C31) • 3010141 0003 ( O 061331 OEC]103 /5111 031 13211 1[44 • C3 /� oNo 00035 ARr. c . 2010. 13154 W ;' A610R0 30 -0'1 10111; 4031E 3011 (310 WADING 0005 010 -01144) © Ro060 1.0100[ Pia 1010310 (3 5001.5 01313300300 O 1*9e9et5 1 -30*13 44• 3110116140.9 81 1011 Mt IDNU p IIbg*0 1 - *6•2 r.0. 1 IS -0 lSCD POUND 16111011vac t© 1.1005(0 1.3031 t01 ce -1030 wn 1 1/ 00330001W U 1001) Q 0101.0.0 1 - 41004C 440. 0088 00011 E0 0011 60.0 30010130 1.36111 U ■ 33' 1O11e1.V war 100.35 30330 MORRO 7 -16015 r -0' 1 11' -0' (3161 10. R) 010A[5 MCA ▪ /111114 ttrN1 31 503613 10 R 311.330 TO 1119881 (01107 *00011 0104503 61617 31011 30307*010. © CC MM3 4 V/OSUNEO MG 10 (S( 3[1.,0417] WILD CCI4501vC0. ® /10110.0 1 -1600L 60. 0001* 10113 ( 0031 .3 0 111 ) 00030011 30100 188101 1 ® 001030.0' - af u0. A100 mot woe= 10 ® 80615192 !31005 u1. Mf* 100. (30010. 911'1) (411107)1 9060 0770. /2) O 13 51001 1.3110131 0705( ® 10510: VfU 0•440 3 0001 341 (1 • 90.0' 041 RI) GENERAL NOTES 13100 10 0411031E .000 31 (06110 1(330 I10107, Al 500710 35133001 10 7e. 2*00000 /V- 1040 91311 701E, 740 3008 71100 30 50 10000 . -1111 9 4100 112 100010 W .ri H007.11) 0141! 1001 (313103 11182.11: :- R'JO 1 00 0 0'1 71 fA 3610,0 14 30515 1 -1003,1 00:0000:00(3030,3 0x 0000300 yWA1 4+11 39.04 10 0060'70 SCE (ID 30.4120 111342005630 ( 204 10 0* 7001030 19 - 1's ,06l 1537 1010. EM`. 8600700 30350 OF 10 0 0C0OSTO ( - *00.0 1510 1004110 on 04 04. 004.01 i1R (113001 311 -0•3) P003 RARE 011310 10 41001E 6393001 •61331 16117 110014 (1001 302' - 9886) PIIPAW1 T • •Mobile Stick Together' 1551 E 0YST9 KVA WI x00 00130. CA 11101 PR0)FC 1 11.700 VATX54 1E0471411 SCE LICHT POLE SCF LIGHT POLE 9514523518E PECMWGA 3039KWAY 0 NA 0(1336TO 1EUCCUU, CA 92592 11(vEN5170 COU9FY 01000611 15SW LAIR ((`""19521x0 101 [ REV ZONING SUBMITTAL P•V_='1ATF - 19 - SCRIPTOS. - 0f 0 A A A 14» 3 /1010 11/111/1)90 11/05/3110 10/11/3310 01/31/1011 01/10/101 65:40 rol 03-10 IYa4: Kwt 61110 IM 031000 a530I03 � 0 700 il. 1531.1'4 0910 IW 40 75•400 S..t 3313 ==.74 GOA4.0 10. c'r 1030 10(0414 930 •0 xe DRAWN m - 00 • APY I JEC J - MN I CJC I ) -0 ONFPANFD Fre 11 If • 1 �■ ■ R 1 KDC AR04IEC7S.ENGINIIIIS P.0 01023 ROR x191 Mot 1310301.1 Ne maims. -SHEET T.TIE PROPOSED SITE PLAN A-2.1 209008 Ll!� 7 - TlP10 ) 294 � a 111PK 1911, r51 }9�7P1 0 EXISTING NORTHWEST ELEVATION n 'sou we 28.X or- 1•.0• 1013 RA .opt Mt • T cl O _ — = 2 PROPOSED NORTHWEST ELEVATION o 2 "") I late 1a Hat EA% 1'.8 101 1101 384' • 141 0 KEY D NOTES 0011.0 30 -r XL 80.0 101t 10 u£ 0811M0 0 080010 104 /� 8.31080 SSW 307.1 10 81 1110.0&1 <a> 1203304 01108001D 111011 100 8( 1110100= 81•118 1=N not 14 rot& (4t 10/0510/ float 01041811) O (3 1 K11C wl Ol 1r1 110ro0m T -1104[ 1811 Napo trove AI Lon 3Pm lwnr O 1110100= T- 11021E r -o• 1 17 -' 111201D10410 £5301011 M{AT O 8 1 I.. E V► I 8 08 /122500 0. 5804 ® MOM. 1 -11041 000 0001 a 101. 302 rarrPTAE - T • •Mobile Stick Together' 3251 t. 000511 NOW. SM1t 200 0110300. a 11101 CT R EDRA/A 10 IE04714H SCE LIGHT POLE SCE LIGHT POLE 101,522516E PECHNWOA PARKWAY 0 VW 01LBERTO YE11ECUTA CA 92592 RNNERSKIE COUNTY r CURR•HI 8SS4 M E r K41/T3 FOR L REV. ZONING SUBMITTAL 0 03/10/2011 RFY — PATC — OFSCRIPION A A A A A 00/13/2010 41/01 /0310 11/03 /2010 12/11/2010 01/31/2011 05/10/00/1 05010 105 1 5VN0 10.0o (0WW 20.4 0 45080 MS ACV OW*. 111141140 89.09 i9R REV (2000 158•110 1� 984 00*0 100 150 30010 93•1 x0 ►.0 Al 11.0 =01/1/0 PRTPMrn (0' 111==1 411M• NMI • 1 MN • 1 1 Mill 1 1 ME 1 1 KDC ARO9RCT9.0NG9K05, P.0 03.70101110018101 .0884 =03 4O .O%M B 80a 023148184 EXISTING AND PROPOSED NORTHWEST ELEVATIONS 58 209008 IOP 0-' E�St4 0,014 1,41_ 100 p EKSI4: 111.1!'04[_ __ <\ O EXISTING SOUTHWEST ELEVATION c 2 ' 4' I1Gt ra 4044 W4'. 1••0+ Ya1I 141 1411• 1J. +rr. $r + a r. 1 -OCILI WOO*. lour POLL S� ��,-� r.,o+9419 , •vow[ .Inyrlu . C44 Saw" mar J` ]]00 D t Y I l ast r00ytt0 SV 404 401f 1 e 0 0. 0 O U 0 11 PROPOSED SOUTHWEST ELEVATION D 2 4' mu 10121431 .•3r- 1`.d >v11 440 44 1 4/0 l 1 1• 11 KEYED NOTES .0 ANOG 31 -1' 114 .tall 400 W 41 .4009 10101010 Vt41 / J � t>410C u•[ 1fi l 14 at 0t1GGR0 \% EYLIMO KC00010 SIMI 4011 O 00041 30• -3v 1191 Stt 1.011 001 3304 wpm COQ 010.01114) © MONO 1.4041 N2R mammas (3 1000.1 411 ACM) O n10044) 00ff0 4 -10011 10. 000041 WIMP WIMP a 41 4 1 011 (41 O M00001 1 -•0044 T.0' 0 13' -0' 0100010100 09301944 0404 O ROMEO t -14102 Ira (0YUt .0 100 SOOT 0/ MAl00W 01► h maw 000004.00 004040 40u mac ,OK O 40049 4 -121 4041 1 10U412 t 0 +I 9'44445 )'REPO)E0 - T • -Mobile.' .PR Stick Together' 31.34 4. 0041 OOata SUIt 303 0.tuc. a •1141 Irrt wR x LIA34044 1E04714H SCE LIGHT POLE SCE LIGHT POLE 004523516E PECIIANGA PARKWAY 0 NA CASERTO TEUECUTA CA 92592 RIVERSIDE COUNTY = CURI4FA't ISSUE OAR ( ' - S,ro IS FOR [ REV. ZONING SUBMITTAL - R19 '�)ATI•�33CPW' 000,10 40 0fl® 2004 /KNEW 00/13/3010 11/0 11/03/2010 14/01/4040 01/)./3011 Ca/'0 IOtk - 8f 306400 404 20414 1004410 401,00 104 I11V. 11310 1084111 341[0 100 IKV 20400 90114 1,9A0 IOR kV. 104110 RAPAII44 IS9A0 101 00 301040 6701110 040 140 IGS l•Y .40 .eC 03 /10/2011 ( f� J1p■ AWN 00 4 {,141 JEC 1 414 .4, VA 0RFYA11 1 100 MN. EJC PENN s to • EXISTING AND PROPOSED SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 6 209008 5 = (3100 aI o3m1 1 "1°" JO Cf. Dry ..v 0.00 -40 • 7 ♦ M4. WO.P Moo 1111 -1 9.44• • 4• Wo4a 1.74 fRT - , V A-7B W < Y1Y A-t0; f*Q. �fN a -M 110'113: to142.444 neftw 14.4.44144141 1■111■11MINAMO4 a 10e044 TIM ..A40..I MN. l 4411.14. M1 NISIIMOM nn An .41•R R444 w 4Y . 4 4.44.40 M 141.00• 1474140Aten 4.447 11oea1R 74144.4AI4 W1 •.4R41.4414 7110 A IMn 741 50 0401/7100 LOOM soli COED. C4400 TO 1IWi[Is 74'44 AIMED 74 AKTDNA IIOIf awl voi A7MR 01•07 1 -1 OR IR 137 a 111e1 T .1/y' 0400 Wnr K 7.r 111' 101101 NIT a ttr ORAL ET NW TO POET OOI {'COON INN 1040 101 .041 4117 • Or 0. 4•0• el MT Mal 10017/ 011) 7 0 N wpm Wm 00. M10T NU (1)1/41 -17 • 1 -1/? a{ n La i s Lt. 11011 00? 1 a A •r w 174 e01 PUTT; • OLC Pi (MOB./ C TO ■•>0 VS T6M II SOUTHERN CALWORNIA EDISON 8P3OWW0 (3000Q MTh II Fr. ARM �•i�� afwaf: 53B � 1D/0210G1t1 CHUM AS SHOAT ••• No. 010 -01244 I 0 0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON BP900X09 LIGHT POLE 147 la %MI LIGHT PALE ® PERSPECTIVE .4 70 0401 .01 ID 0011 14001 A 0141 b` rn I I I I I � L . J r ; 1 4 41 3 . . Arrows 401(2 I0 RoLVM M0f1 W4 I0 -C 1401 110.1 1041; RCM 70 OCTAL 1/4 - P44<040 444.144 11•57 70 00 14: C 4 Wi Am.* 10 AWIMM AMMO 20-4' 1..E LOOM' 401:, 41104 10 C< 1/A • CAL1 (1) WIEIM 4 9 ■A•4 M 045 40• 404 4X01 • I1C.110. e4.0 -01 (3) 410•45, 111 POT 5001010. 00(4 10 0,2 041(02 104 40410 001041100 ANTENNA CANISTER DETAIL LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL SISIN 0470 . 1111•- X114.1e4 04101.90.6( 04 7 ■ .4, 1 YIO 400171'. 11.2 11111 01I 4e) ) 70 K tClota 11• 010•0710 4'1 441111• V 5rM 443 .r ouD 00474.,4 t 11•. 70 Y0✓4n p4oTtO 1D wA9 I 1 ix07V.S0 109 W. 1RW54410.7 04 0 MO WASS 07* 0471. wo a 974110 TO DOM MIMS a•s Mt OR M T O M 4 o TR often oem• a O 8 ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL rot M 00(1 3 N OM rr94u144•4w77•4.74 4 7 4 4 w W 4 / 4 474774..704004734600 CrCowl 1 M•. 40000100•. =••• rCi[ N1• W4I4•d4 I W 14rinw YYO 0•04.14•444.16.4144 warm.. 044 41444 .4 4.01 �.y� �1 [� _ S. j1. 0 4.0!10 y 4 471yrww�tl104f4Yi ••M4 was 4 4 � 0 • 014 •M . .YY Y• V 4 4 ••.K4A4144114.4444.•4 o la •44/ M. 44 40. r� Pii.;; #F•:.7fri ••••Mobile• Stick Together' 3773 E. 4,44O 4040. •74 700 017 4IMI PROJECT lROR1MT1017 IE04714H SCE LIGHT POLE SCE UGHT POLE 10/1523918E PECHMGA PARKWAY • VIA GLBERTO IELIECIRA CA 92592 RNERS)0E COUMN = CURRENT ISSUE CATE 03/10/2011 KS7M0 001E REV. ZONING SUBMIT I 'mFv =auk 44/t 7 /701,1 411020 40.474 10134(0 A A n 11/07/074 12/11/7010 101010 819•114 ISO= E04 KV. 104.1* SUB4nA 111.40 NA Are. noftfts 54444710& IWE(0 104 REV. 7040 010141140 A\ 0 nRKO 1474 �. 74440 0414744, 100 MD 1101 40 40 I JCG I MOM I - EJ II - PINS PREPMED HY 4444 Tom Ia R KOC ANCHEIECTSEN401010. P.0 Mann / 14400. Ml04010704 114x. 47S1MAn1 1100 4141//441 PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0069, A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CELLULAR FACILITY DISGUISED AS A STREET LIGHT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY GENERALLY LOCATED ON PECHANGA PARKWAY DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM VIA GILBERTO (CLOSEST APN 961- 020 -027) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On March 17, 2011, James Rodgers, on behalf of T- Mobile West Corporation, filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0069, a Wireless Telecommunications Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0069 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.010.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The proposed use requires a minimal amount of servicing, which will create little traffic. The proposed use is consistent with and meets all the requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; By designing the antenna to resemble existing street light poles, the proposed project is designed to integrate with the existing streetscape. In addition, the nearest residential structure to the antenna is located approximately 170 feet to the east. The use is determined to be compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures. Furthermore, the conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; The project meets the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code. As a result, the proposed conditional use meets the requirements of the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; Support equipment will be housed underground and will thus not be accessible by unauthorized persons. The project has been reviewed and appropriately conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the application for a Conditional Use Permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15303, Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures); The project consists of the installation of a 35 -foot street light pole with antennas for wireless telecommunications. Support equipment will be placed within an underground vault. The project is in an urbanized area and will not impact any existing structures. The project and surrounding area has already been developed and is thus not environmentally sensitive. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0069, a Wireless Telecommunications Facility Application to allow a cellular facility disguised as a street light to be located within the public right -of -way generally located on Pechanga Parkway directly across from Via Gilberto, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Roy Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July 2011, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0069 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Assessor's Parcel No.: 961- 020 -027 (closest) MSHCP Category: NIA DIF Category: NIA TUMF Category: NIA Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements A Wireless Telecommunications Facility Application to allow a cellular facility disguised as a street light to be located within the public right -of -way generally located on Pechanga Parkway directly across from Via Gilberto PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. On telecommunication towers, equipment, walls or other structures, all graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR RF Transparent Canister Match Corresponding Light Pole PL -9. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -10. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -11. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. PL -13. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing streetlights shall be paid for by the developer. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit PL -14. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -17. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions /Information B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed Antenna Facilities. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B -4. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. At Plan Review Submittal B -5. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -6. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. PD -2. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506 -5132. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the structure should be removed or painted over within twenty -four (24) hours of being discovered. Report all crimes to the Temecula Police 24 -hour dispatch center at 951 - 696 -HELP. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide construction drawings showing the location of proposed facilities in relation to the right -of -way, sidewalk, curb line, and centerline of the street. Drawings shall show all existing improvements including existing storm drains, utility facilities and conduits. PW -6. A copy of the Applicant's Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN). PW -7. Support facilities (i.e. vaults, equipment enclosures, utilities) in the public right -of -way shall be placed in underground vaults to all extent. Installation of above- ground cabinets and vaults shall be avoided. PW -8. New underground telecommunications and electrical conduit shall be placed behind curb in accordance with City Standard Drawing 609. A minimum 30 inches of cover shall be maintained above the shallowest conduit. The vault lid shall be a heavy duty traffic lid acceptable to the Public Works Department. PW -9. Applicant shall utilize existing conduit whenever possible per Municipal Code Section 5.12.160. Excess capacity within existing conduits and facilities shall be utilized whenever possible. Applicant shall investigate and identify locations of existing facilities of all utility companies, including underground conduits that are available for shared use. No excavations or directional borings shall be made without research and determination bythe Applicant of existing conduit availability, including contacting and coordinating with owners of existing conduits. PW -10. If it is determined that there are no other existing conduits available for shared use, the Applicant shall certify in writing as such. The written statement shall describe in reasonable detail the efforts made to obtain from other utility service providers the right to use excess capacity within existing facilities. PW -11. Location of any above - ground facilities shall be in compliance with Caltrans sight - distance requirements. PW -12. Applicant shall coordinate the construction of new facilities with other providers in order to avoid redundancy or the construction of new facilities. PW -13. Installation of new conduit shall be by directional boring where possible. Open excavation shall be avoided. PW -14. Water discharge resulting from both construction and underground facility drainage shall comply with NPDES regulations.' PW -15. The City may apply reasonable limitations upon the number of aboveground facilities that may be installed within a designated geographical area. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11006207.doc Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below PA11 -0069 James Rodgers on behalf of T- Mobile West Corporation A Wireless Telecommunications Facility Application to allow a cellular facility disguised as a street light to be located within the public right -of -way generally located on Pechanga Parkway directly across from Via Gilberto In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15303, Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Eric Jones, (951) 506 -5115 City of Temecula, Council Chambers July 20, 2011 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. DATE OF MEETING: July 20, 2011 STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application No. PA11 -0085, a Wireless Telecommunications SUMMARY: Facility application to allow a cellular facility disguised as a streetlight to be located within the public right -of -way along the south side of Wolf Valley Road, approximately 283 feet east of the centerline of Pechanga Parkway. RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Categorically Exempt Section 15303, Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Name of Applicant: Rob Searcy on behalf of Verizon ICES General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: City of Temecula right -of -way Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Lot Area: Total Floor Area /Ratio: City of Temecula right -of -way Site: Existing Sidewalk /City of Temecula right -of -way North: Wolf Valley Road, Vacant Lot /Neighborhood Commercial (NC) South: Existing Sidewalk, Vacant Lot /Community Commercial (CC) East: Existing Sidewalk, Vacant Lot /Community Commercial (CC) West: Existing Sidewalk, Vacant Lot /Community Commercial (CC) Existinq /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required N/A N/A N/A N/A Landscape Area /Coverage: N/A N/A Parking Required /Provided: N/A N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY On April 9, 2011, Rob Searcy, on behalf of Verizon ICES, submitted Planning Application PA11- 0085. The application will allow a telecommunication facility disguised as a street light to be placed within the public right -of -way along Wolf Valley Road. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The applicant is proposing to construct a 35 -foot telecommunication antenna disguised as a street light pole. The proposed antenna will match neighboring street lights with the exception of a five -foot radome antenna cover painted to match the light pole. The antenna will be located on the south side of Wolf Valley Road within the public right -of -way approximately 283 feet east of Pechanga Parkway. The array will consist of three antennas. Support equipment for the site will be installed within an underground vault adjacent to the proposed street light pole. The nearest residential unit is located approximately 400 feet to the west. The applicant is requesting the new wireless facility in order to achieve consistent service to customers. The City is currently processing a total of 39 right -of -way telecommunication sites for New Path Networks. These facilities will also be disguised as street light poles. The nearest of these facilities relative to the project site is approximately 1.22 miles to the northeast. This distance makes co- location with a New Path Facility infeasible. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on July 7, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15303 Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). The project consists of the installation of a 35 -foot street light pole with antennas for wireless telecommunications. Support equipment will be placed within an underground vault. The project is in an urbanized area and will not impact any existing structures. The project will also not impact the adjacent vacant lot, FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.04.010.E) The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The proposed use requires a minimal amount of servicing, which will create little traffic. The proposed use is consistent with and meets all the requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. By designing the antenna to resemble existing street light poles, the proposed project is designed to integrate with the existing streetscape. In addition, the nearest residential structure to the antenna is located approximately 400 feet to the east. The use is determined to be compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures. Furthermore, the conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The project meets the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code. As a result, the proposed conditional use meets the requirements of the Development Code. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Support equipment will be housed underground and will thus not be accessible by unauthorized persons. The project has been reviewed and appropriately conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the application for a Conditional Use Permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing SHEET INDEX 1 'F ' 3 111tL :NW 2 OF LS 188'iEYM110c5. fiN9pE. 4'.l• NOTES 3 O: to . swm 4 OF 13 :Rte 5 OF '3 SJ35TP "41114 SRE FIN, 6 OF IS S1EISTAV U9E SI1L PEAS 1 OF 13 0C11.5 8 OF 13 PM R A E:O•PIONS 9 al I1 Al IATDIAMODIA 10 OF 13 W1p1 CATOILOk ILL4A110A5 11 OF IS VE17" VAC. 1#(MIS I< 01 Is EDIAPNEN OLIM�S SYMBOLS _ 0T4.01 !INCIYF I£GFND i4'JIPU +;1 1I;161) - ® verign wireless Southern California 15505 Sand Canyon Ave. Irvine, CA 92618 PROPRIEiAR• INrORMAtION r.4 vAkwlrx ;;N iv TAI s: L0 00C44T41S S fiie.L:tt11 V + PIS IIA [PECHANGA ROW NM. R Mq'�L ACGAENN t�U.AU R.S•1 ACE Pd.EOMNHIIE wou, ". .; rt. ;L0• - �c VaU - - -__- - uH. - -- - N.-03 . +... ,.�. "..,0 - - -• .s1KN IG - - 1 - -- - 'L.1 R '':4 :'',4“t• .y [ cLLPR06CTp . I 10010009.15 :OP - � "p`� S.A.. pR �� ` 104 ARY - POWER & TELCO UTILITY CONTACTS co: w -.,. • C MTAi' . =6' 1 8455 ;•. t <1 � NOW .,9171 597 - PR:1.E. T33 CONSULTANT TEAMS .GI,,L :cow,. ,.,4,,.,.....,.... WALE FH0NEEREVG SEMIS '5635 3CW:VEDA 6.i:. ;AN , .,` u ( �=.:,,ru: °ADN(. 7110) S9d ?557 COAIALI; POW( W,EGAS MO iJRViYOn: SIitUCIUk7.- :■ • 4 b;RI 11.42I 1 3: N A 11NT ArERUE. '. d MAPPING M�A IE 38 AR NAT C 98 ti ?NAT A 92 5 76 IIONC. (714) ”7 -155.: FAX.; 4)', _156R WCJRIUA 5776 FAX. (71Q Si ::a13AC If le 1.1k C -C ,;1 luclN: - - _ - . + 7I(. - 'r PECHANGA R.O.W. (PRELIMINARY ADDRESS) 31550 WOLF VALLEY RD. TEMECULA, CA 92592 SCE POLE ID #4469160E 1 \ / \ ✓/ verI on w;.PjPSs P.1�a016 R:vfRSe7! PA 201: 'HOvAS GUIDE C(: 9 %1 1YT• f 1 lsmss.c C.v., SO° i06-18 PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE PROJECI CONSISTS OF THE INSTAL!ATION AND OPERATION OF ANTENN45 A140 ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT CABINETS FOR VERIZON'S PERSONAL COMMUNICAT.ON SERVICES (PCS) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SCE T O RCPLACC AN CX 29' -6" OCTAC0IU_ CONC. Si. UGH SCE PaIC 1.0. /4 69160[ WIIN A NEW 29' -6" ROUND CONC. ST. LIGI❑ SCE PDU 1,0. 4469160E WITH 3 PANEL ANTENNAS .40USEU INSIDE A 24" DIA. . 66" TAU RAUOME ON TOP (TOTAL SIRUCIURE HEIGHT: 35' -0 "3). VER/2011 WIRELESS TO PUCE (1) 7 '- 1 ;5 ".25' -15 "3.10' -6.25' O CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT MAKk1OLE WITII WAEER (14TI; HAIGH (CNN 624). (1) 18'x50 "nl6" PACIFIC ELECTRIC MC(ER PEDESTAL. (1) 23;3 " 134.5')117.5" RCN PEDESTAL ANO (I) 3'45'x4' SPLICE VAULT IN THE GRASS PARKWAY. MAO PREPAltWet: cable engineering q, y: O v 13 1 raM a r �yr ? b 4 z " - . .S 11 d � ' 1 % 9 gy , i 4 , ' - ?A �' •� Z ' ° ,7' - ` , -_ • ' • y ,)r , • • _.t, p - C j1 a b 0 f j 4 4.4 O' C4 . O. • 4% (jd" '3 r • "°1 LYE q" 4 6' L' * . I. b ®' q 4 � .i. tJr0.i ' ,,�� $ $ ms s 'ro ct d s`�r� � ' . ' :' .�1 o- �y a '` � a� �( Q b �e •p•[` - PROPOSED SfFE.1.00ATION . C � yr ' F' 0 ,t9 �• % � 7. CA 4. i Q �, .,1 7 4 h t '� P1vtu•4y v ' N . RcOIF BIrR. / $ I - � '� � -' ` • � a` I ..-.. services pRLXOTFc IJ11CA7pN, N1[, t0:4133,...1. BM Sao I, IWae1�uHJIT vw.lp:plapw:LS3 ruRO:In4)IeASta -IIEN an _ - �" ' Isr 3' - � yo ' - a "- s - - COORDINATES LATITUDE' 3S° 27' 36.32" N I LONGITUDE: I i7' 06' 25.19" 44 PROJECT SUMMARY A2PLM+NI: v1:0200 sr R[!ESS N/A 15553 SAN) CANTON Rl` IRVINE. C+ 97618 7aWN6: :.GS. r1,GoELM. C.ES. RATIREY/ LIND ROB SFARCY 10050 SEPULVEDA BLVD. 5011E 1 1 86+0 5EP914O. BLVD. SD,IE I 61551'36 4 "A 91365 P'�V (8'8) 5532 F (013 898 -9 8 TAR: (338) 856 -9186 + s 1 A1: JURISDICGON: N/A cnr nr i[uECULI APPROVALS .Hl S M / RS tlYl j'7 1 :.0 �O s C.µ' 1 4 .3• m 1 k v n .. Y .l1. W431t41n. Int./... s uL 4d Ir IC 1 11 t, 111. •'AU. sae LLU 5 1 I�TET" IU MC L[MS 9144 AM u•'r 411 .v° 14 f 1 . 4 kr TINT w•14 .C111 ! r '� T IA /•1 i I/ - - • ,- _ - _ .vr u` 1 ur ¢I: +. i T>sEl TITLE SHEET SLIEFTYJMOk -� - �- I 4.8.:14 _- = ._ +'v'IF3.0. , pL j ., PCS __-_ - - - - . - -- - _ - - I VERIZON WIRELESS SITE LOCATION 1 OF 13 Cot OM IRL ATC111LN 0 A • n 41 4 FED SY DESCPOTION MCC OF Mr 104£101 MOW44Y tDOf ti•041 101 141144 114 0.111 FACE MAtl1TY4N MCC +x444 0 144 44. 44*.' Toff 005674 Pat' 1e710MD1RE02E 577•74C100 M40tiva 14 5t11TXL/FF! DOW GUY A�E N1a14*1 1ITI111011K MIRY AVOW SEWN MIME 1441440 414T VW* NWT MAIM'S 7040QV3111 '437. :44344,6404 03.4441 WO* M 4 144 W 074 • Of WAWA. 4`.44 r44.S1 44•:3 :x •wl: •.r 1 :K 414000. Co Of 1•-W4 R vs Nit. Nl .170 44.6104S lit•SC1o4. MCISSW .4 4 ;Otte. Mous* 4 . 104641.40.4 1 1. 4 16 got LS 5744.0.47!* 741' 004:10•01 o ~ Wow* 4G O4 0( 14444 1 ro•o) 0 0 l 4 FFXFF - 10 A.( 05.11. Of 4.1043 44:441S .avrt '04 *41' A G1004.s •04 .0 OM* WOE ut 010:4411 4444 00.4: 51 6600640.51 *•44 40 1.: /W ..0 6••441 1.47 MY. 114 6 Of 4( 4' *tl 4 04 CO K'Wrf 44.10 7• 44.441 *441 • 244.4 OOP ".P 0007046•0 3444 4 4434431.4'0 4•4414* 41 u 44111C*43 A' 0C Lot ERRS 504%'.4 N1 OW-MSS KAI 44* 40.4 44 444.0 6111** O. 7.62141.1 10 44 15:60 WC 440 1 MOWN 44. 4e1.4 .t a..: 3414.4744 PAW* • 4 .1 pd'1414* 75.1'4T3 M OA- 44.7.4.1.4.6. • ONT54344 -. or •344 1.4841 41 S 6.4(1 411 toosono10r 104.1 'K 4421 •M 1•( 00*• 4. 44.10 47444,-40 441 ' 0. 0i. . 441600 M *WWI' *4 44T 1t •,.70(5 .0 10(74 104 03.464 Y 441140. u 4. 4.140* CO 11<4 •.+4144.41 •,4Y hr. *SSC. •K.' AA 'S.: '47411 4 Otto: : 14 'I 04 40 C0.•.10G 4)1 A *: 44 4' 44 *T(t 4* C1074:3 .haT 444, K 1.64.1103 4T 00 3 - ll r.IYS • •484 1 *4rtf 444444 4 .: 44•. Ti 44 4 43 1.6 14 fat 44 0 .444414.: 41. {L•1* IY 4,4 4.1 M !•1.4. Y 444 1 C4.44AC143 10 IA 44447 M.4 14 ■ M: 44 «M(YCn1S 7'14 3444 316104*'./{ 43.P•s4 145 W.41t34.<TIEi 3 T Y Ci401•C41 ..a..335 11 VOW YD 34700' 4444 AMP 444.40000 1104440 401404.1 144 440474• KU' S"ORAGE IA 4 • 4( 11 Di a MI 416 6 .e: n'C M1 Rw 4 • 144 '41.111 4441 it 10'7(3 •410(00144 6.14E 11 13•■ O. 5211 S 4443) 4[1140 A/11 045! .:4 0) 0.5.$'444705 RELATED DDCUMEN - S AND CDDRDINATM]N Ca0(M. 00461144600'1. 1114.704. 0440 611004 043063 441 '41001044440 11 404 44 144004 at 74 40. Tel I00 COC ■RT * t4( 0 W CACAW* 41. :4000.4040 400* 4' N 40045 1 0 44 .3 'x4146 C1ANGE DRDER PROCEDLRE 44144 4400.1 w V. 4.4 .00 M •4 4 '47 4• ••4.01 d V 7r11 •il.. 0. .0 C14 4444 OW 4G'R: 0044' ' .•.'t • 504.0 •1'140.4, •• 1:14 !*'l 1 •. 0+ At ': MI Or{. 6536 13 .41 IM 4'• 130.6 Y W . ': f.1. U�.fCK f4 M1t 00.' N: '. 4 J4:t 4N. 0010.:1 'f:.Nf I'!• 5.44.1.1 • 1 A. ...MAl Wettest .•3.,' (7 ••: L� Y .444 Y ,'. ►ML ♦ • •.0 .f 0 • 4.6*.. _"l • •/".."411. 40 6444 4 1 44- 10 4.44 k .4.41. H 445 v _ x•100:. SN ^.= D RAn•I NG 4 .. :comm. •114. 701 140 4.444'4 K NSW* :M . 00* 7441 *WIGS 144(4( 01444 r 40*74. .- 4644 *WW1 Wu le K'904(0. 4 X40.0 44 :••46460 A 600•/6/04 3104 A 034714 43141 4444* 1 GENERAL NOTES 14i}1:. - _,. 'TS ? ? ONT. 4 K ppyy(( 11 t 10 (639 MAP 0* 913. 340. 5 0 0, 1 4.*7544 KM'.G I.• .' 44 4•:'1 1. 0 1•6.444 MOO 4 j ,4) ••t 6 \i 1 4 64 : 1. 0300 604041!•1 544- •!4.147,1 i t4* 04444x3 44 40 1 3.161 44 164656*• 6 q4 •'C 4160 *MS +.C. • 44 MCAT < 44*74C &N 1 0 . 1'11541 44 E 1.t *.O '444! KO* % W1. 114 MOW 4 1 41 4 • WOO :.1' Co 00 1+<115. i;07E :DMPLIANCE 01 4 •. ti:a•D.KC •4,4 •Tf.Nl 414CN S1ATt • 04 14 410 .014.4.4 COMM* -WS* WA .WA: M or R WO '4 Of 41155' K5*n If .4 +0•0044 •r 1111AY.':E 3.61L' ?5-'.0 -- -- -- 4R2 _O f4_ 1 •4)M 44 5504 • 1000. 4.0 444)'0. 30 1 5: C. 0 . 1 .( 1 ,14 4" 44•1. 4. l$,0* : : .1 44 4.604 .4 4!110 44 44*t.V 6 144. ICI COMM, W. 4(,• a,* VIO. 0V 1141 514'l' • .0:•44:.44541.4 n. `10.'1 Kt T•640( - 005-.(4,1 5 - D '.I 49410 f 1.14:441 Nti •1'4 4 b W YOp.•. 100E Y..W NV:43 • r..S7 41 K .01440 4 01!4.111 !P •CAUK0 1.0A** 441* • WOK ADMIN :317LAT. N ,��111pp - _ 4 4 1 4 0.4. 141'14'44 0 4K�� 63 *0047 POW K WM11Cr !00 .21 40410044`. 1.SA140 01 443 4YLC.l. 10 413.6:' .10447 111 tR Dt�1 A 0 61LLt 1440 1 4 4*44.0 0*. 4410 0 tK 06.413 11.10 70 140 VA 7 440 • 4, W 4111 4* t .DO 4:`•( ^iM •� : '4 1M4At 44146. • •414 W '.a - + s at Wow 4.0044 ' 5�11 4)5(.. 4'41.' *1154X5 440 *14400 * 0 ..f.., ILLi1 VOWd J 4. *Ira . 1A 404..440. 3 14 N• '3'4.x94.54 0 J u 54)•( ttw 1-.• S.444.0.1. 16414444 (1 4l YY 4 •4)h 'Y :044004 SPWI*-Cyµ MN WO f W. 1:4005 N [4.4 44.410 4444 •4 WAN 04611 44 54.00 .41,414 ,44 3. 631 ,1 41(4 :15 . 484 .0t tl 0 • 4050; '4.1* 1 011MA MOAN K 40041440) • 401.71 - lo0 au et taws 404 30404 4)10 Or O0mw• CD7•104*0. 5141 Y A VOW '40.( M A RIM MD 4mamw� s.mwn�w4ntr'. 1 CAWS 6061.144(405 C«414001 4(1 DAWN .4T 114147163 *3 10404004*" 4 4 KM .46; 14/1 114 0444 4.10410 0004640 MIL TAM 040.1041 05* * 4. 44101 mans WIT 40400440 1 C 6 40'4 64414 O.' VOWS 613 0603000 0 b SR 44 00455 '1 OE 04 016' 44444 40 4.314 • 76•100 1.11151 .X 6011441111* 0110444 416 4011141 11 040040 MOM 10 SW 41 Cf•6541a•t 1 071100 D( 01401 4' 40t51 4)4445 1 30170 M 144 6.1 4 41331.4 104•40* Ot tom= owl 1471 Menton. 414 4314407 6'e'/.7 411441 t 6■50440 644610 1 1344 44•8(7! 644 *011<13 WA 666 1A0, 4 4 4444444 40. 4 104!,! 44050* *401 01/43/1 4 1. 63411 ..0,'1040*' I*WM aE =r MAW*. 7410 4" 3 143 411 m IN OA nit.. * 4.M041*4 a man 0014W6 04 Rano 6.1440 4 360. *NT45 •7 OW 6 .l 604 M 14 10*L 11!1 SA-. *1104( 4. *SOW 04o'4 540 •MO N M WAWA 4414. 16504G •LL WO •005*. }6040.044 44. SOMA WOWS 4000 146 1UH 1■•• .114 1400 44- 444' •044 4K n. A 3II WAXY • SOW 4 007. W'lSP loyS •f 44*.•: A4 WC* Y 9JN1 WOWS (.14 MACAO 744044 i • • MUSS 7 I1 OWCA 4.4•1014. ,'Ott *4 44444/010 .1044 OW. 4,4 4a4404 04 171 906.43E 00- 1 -. 4;. 1ES . 141.444.0141 :144/1 1-! [0.143.04 44 0444' y .l •44: - 3 t " •.. 6 .444 • 4%44.4 1 3r -* 4' t ytt 404 34 l : 6 10 7*01 ?' N S •.If CATINTO. t a •( 4 :' - _ in' .::1. •t• :X4*. OW sun (wont. 3541' -. ' r f - - • 014.0....: Sh41*0 1 *1440' r. 404.'^'•: 'K: M0.4W0.* u x74* .4 - 4: *Cr 'l.0• •41600 6 6.5.8 33. - 1:33s663.3 + • <6 1 :Y1•1R5 5* " Y •(•• f4'+ .L S' :4 4-I.S. ono M .D' 44 (0 11.5 f 04 611, .44*. X IF* ?a_ 10.:4, .1.85 CWlrn 1 01)1 Y •. • try t. ..`. 1 M 1 m 414, 741 M 11 oro 1 4 441 u .5 '*441 V.i.i'N.• 800. i 1: t S Mr.-46.+1. 4 . *0* Si cute, 4.14 74•45•S 410 But u COW R T115 44.5•CCTA M 0441[]44 Y M1f 4471, 11 0M'C d M 0 (404Y11Kl: 0. 1 .K 40 411 "WAS 1444} M 44 f IY1 1414 QM COW10 M 067444 . 0 1 811 14400 [ FM KW Wt R ''4 14 44.3704• a N }-44000 11 163*.t 0073113 .333 ..407 i 1 C MAX 014744 Wn4052 XI% *Wow* mow 1AO6 104*, 111 '• 4 JAS TM 0.1E MA*. ;• A( covet.* AO 05 M. 1004 4731 .411 1 1043 } - o *1444+5 *04 446 1.4 •VIC 47404.0. ' t0t yoyo W , 40,6., 036 6* 0 CV" +A 1 _ 4 , 41 yyu 4 44 • ..,_•••••, +t 4,0.64'.4, -.4 4 4. 1 ' 0 t_1.xamn_ ro .. W14)r*. 41114:1 40. 4y (4.4* 11T14* tit -• •1 4 1444, 714 "K 6 ,06. O •4. K VW, 1 - =F4 ? 41" 440. Av 1: :3'1 •r''• .110 Y' Y. .33 613 14 • , 14 405 44 COWS *44, it %' ( • OS RCMP 44 00.04: KA0966161. 40 44 O b'Y 1C�'t*00* x666"3 44 WNW •[0• 54' .4.10' UY.14. 11 01070 011 eY(yp� 41� tf4KVl1t(IgKy'S•�1754 1 mlIDy07yn1MwTY71rot Y 00 u'9CCN w'CCG" 'R i Y [ t 1 R is ' 44 .:441 044 !1 *0(0 443411111 103 3 46 *404,44 '10/1 t1 C0.Y1CO4134t R v 440121 • 0 4141 11'1 0171 40 b6S14R1 M '. Nlt]" •"OM :d 0.f! �� CI L1ui ?J.t•j. YS�r _ Y - ;' ..41� ; f.11: 44 640-3 t J _ 2 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION TI( *rO 4D7w :71141460 R 'IC, 2: s t394 :t .1;N 30:40075 5 6 601S1643 441 4)01:1 •44 CO 0::40 07* 7 '.54 nut 0.0144 411o!!) 40 .44 ,IW •444LC 3 i : '0.' 4'11 maws PECHANGA ROW 4'4LIMPART 404740 11391131X3YA*SYr4 41310011ACANVO 10010009.15 ' J 4 6(WF0 A4 cab(4. A4d/gN/IRQ r.4swoets FlIESCOTTCOIM(4ATSYa 1040 Swamis 416111. *Ain • CAY11R Pis No, Nrioniext 44*W1111Ya4m RONKRR 4 00- 25 -1•_ MNtuO'0µ4r IA -- 2 C. - 1 R• FE i Tt MIT 01414 ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOLOGY AND GENERAL NOTES rti 14ti 4R � 2 OF 13 Mt 4416 MCI*. . ,4^', I1Nd r• Yr • •p_• , . i • .- �l�1 MSS BM" M -'L S'.�. :of:, s , vliJ•r . 1'Y •34 0, 704 N •- :V 43.7.. : f 0. • ,• 1 ,.,- y« : • :t . rU. eagle engineering • verIZPAW Ireress Sau1Mn eb. In4. t1WS6MnC•6C1AK the G MIS REVISIONS - , •.. Car' [V'ir•■■I• - - . _ _ _ ... - - _ .. _ _ _ _ • -- - 330;1 .�: RlM•Y d . rs R0. +3 -- services PPI.XOTf COMf.••CA9101b •K. 00'`1 1800 ,: __ - - ana iKa'Jr. 4/133018 aMIIrW tmtw�.,R, 10610 SEPULVECw eIw. SUITE 1 MISf10N 236 CA 9 FAx 00100696234 FAX 161811195-9166 t_pl =. .7w ,.R .•0.,.i ... 4000 v.f9m8 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 1784 v0._ �wr 1 •# 0 - 11.84 sr•"• 10 A 1+5 357 - 020 -027 ' r I �` ....7":?‘...; y •t 70.E V. +Y - .. i . * 1 `040 \J Y • - %/ fir. •� f / ■i y R • ':1 15 / i_ • Ww7tre ' -1 J7Y:1ar . 390. A.P 4 952 -010 -007 • . • 3 • /•• 30-18. ' < 1 1 t • ��•,'- • , ' -t Jt4E11A m , 1103008:. ON ▪ n1ID. • 11Y ( NV. LOOM 00 04 C Wi•lf fDl• R•.• P4: •IP 044 €80.7 ("KKR .x• t01rN 3+I.1 r 'W ,003 n raw vr3tt a OASv Kr 0.41 , 83. •41. • 11.10s 1 ON KT 1/1 MC We 1.8A3 114 310•41 may 1N3 9n,t n0 V.9.r i•: MU 0 1.•rL 9•• 91[0 M.Jef 9C57 %Wm R O W [UD WqL • rT • ry3 wic KWIC 97.6. l 901E M. lea n 0000 1841 W. we alp *WA T .K ■901 0!10 IC691..•Ir1 •W 4ai.`(?e OV_ I iWO W04t9 .13E 9.R•0 vue. O -'tC. (i.•1 O17.0.75 Mri 4.9 SAT •A.7f •340•.0. Sart.08 , pew .••t.•1Gnt 1 6.940 ON 6EN046S tot ( 0 3 •9I0 .V0! KJ•9 NW: WS, .r90'00 041 K• RK' NO. 7W4-1. MC 7:3.00 -7E 33(6100 O' 3.,t9:9S MOM ss:z • : ... J....:, 4 wee: CURS 6.008. *004 0*C' t • '1„ rz.rr ,s 704-•, at 1< rcu•0w •: 60.71 0x000 .ru i%r.a6). 11331 on •■ 0: 044.61) .U'w 4.0000 to 300.3 K K c'Hn -. n:C R•l 04c0.105, 413 rr4+ 1 f 4 ,41 8 • 0014 n Ke• Ca . 7,r :V6.C V:1: (.4 0p•• ni Mr 0040 Ma9 1100. WW50.5 4777 Mr 333 303. amV*0 , •r00Mrr■ 310 MYl 0.0G MC yeKa.MVL . 00.6 0*0*0' 611( *0708 M 00 *WWII 19. •.430 1h@••■ `.• K812 ..0 4.t. 1*. n• net 347„6 ••• WAX i*00 01044 00 021•0* 70480 81 4487.009001 8 10.0..3 3 4 000 -• 3. 4*0 ou0 1W r[ 000 0 31000, n2. MR 00906* 30 . 4(.00. f1M0.7 3 0>N 0rot 1c urn 190 aso, SEX SHEET 2 FOR SITE DErNLS ' l' • N I 17;4r 4;r ....a. 4 0 4. 4 C -• .. 1- - , .r • *4 f... . SWF, 17.41sE • .• .. . 7 1 • , . - ... .. i : ::: 4 ', • IC 'VI 'AV cablo cmgrimaarinu PRESCATT COW‘LOIKAS.r7/016CeliK.. - --- - to640 SerutrUm. BIND Sum 4 u4S" 400)898 1414 -2352 ." 9 r - 424o644 IA VeriZaLliWireieSSe 1630)Sand him. CA rale REMO.: . NOMUTAIsi '-.7 .0 -,..::._ DA, 1 T., 7. . . _, -• — _ - - - — - - - - __ _ - — t k -411i' Mgr # . • 1.1, 04 •: - -,,,,,,,,, •, 4. 130 ;., 1•161Igy m.o. -....Tr• , , „.. . r7_. .4 '• a - _ — TOPOGRAMC SURVEY ION. .... 1$4 • •LIA A. of .‘ . _ ... , t 141;.....::: . K • i r ----------- 4t k . * t . . k .. • .--___. _.........,.... 4ki 4.4 - _,„_,_-. --A- _,_ \ 4 ,,•,,,, Goss ' 0 _ ‘.. 4. • i... ,ris f..-..% :. .;-:., ...(ef...•• 11 -.:: p, . "'-' . ___ ____I 5 i _ _ i ___ f r-__-.7. 7 ,.. - ... ---,,,, ..... .....,$-- ----, -. _ .- )- . Ns, '..■ 1 1— ' ili CODO(r.: - • teC•Ite • -. •••:: :7‘ .7 .' •JIM • • 446 ( , • ‘1,7•64-VC •-• it4tv. ____„554 - —..1 . — --•••-r54 -• _ • _ --- • .. it\ _•- - • - • • - • • 2 - „ ,, 9 c • "7 z,. S \ • r 4\J zi Lr; 4, -... v..-$ I A s Glj T — ER _IP „ --.„,- s- ., • , 7 %-f, A, .71.01., •-•,------• --- -... ---- ----,-7.- . F •. NC.; -\_ a - VA , ) 4 • • • • lk•T NAG b•es — •C•ATI. SA •4?" _ .1)Ft • 0•0.-sta • •O55551 MOW& 0. • wow • X• • 1•••• Ma *emu 0-0 SVW tin 'AN X ▪ ■. W •II s • all •••! - - — . .174. • • 1• \! SEE S4-=- F- • • ..jr? r "f .1k." • ft...0 • • r p • • •■00. ...-••• I- • ■•• • 1 v.:* •.•. flPI 1f ■•• • 1146 • ...Jo •■■ • *tn.. . r.•• 214,..7. • •. .• W "a .4.. • v •. •••• 1. .• • •:•••;;S• - • t..t ••• w ...N. • • • - • • • NEON VOA= CONTRACTOR TO NM ▪ ,. / ..:. :'• I R :,:.7,-..14 • i r! , • It4 r . r 43 . 1 ?• ri r t09 : 1 1r. l . P4g 1 — ' ' ' ./,/ . ' • ( POSSei E VERSZON APS Ess la CO SOURCE) \ / / ECACT SOURCE Of FEED AHD ROUHNO / TO SE PROVIDED UPON COIIKETION Of 113.00 MEET. J / • lore 4.4). • \ 4- • • " 00 - / ,•• • 1 /. ./. / t..: - • L .•••• • .. ' :T • 0. • •, / \ rosMetevantanwtEussravaisome) 10: MGT SOURCE OF rem NG ROOMS TO SE PROVIGEOUPONCOMETION OP \ POTTER MEET. nue OESCRIF11011 0 CRY Of TEMECULA PERMIT RIFORMATION COHC... SIGWALK 14)016cg. GRASS PARKWAY FOOTAGE: 11V0 TOTAL FOOTAGE THIS SHEET: 12e.r_ GRAPHIC SC kLE • Flirt 1 INIARMA • [ PECHANGA ROW IPROJIVWCY AIXNESSI 3110/ MOO yule( Rd rilleRFA Goal SCE POLE O ilsostom CIA 1W32:010.: [ 10010009.15 M GOV • • „ • verizonwireless' tsp... Car, Am cw ma 1 e — 'tun Hymn) sr cable engineering services PRESCOTT CONARNoCAIICE45 isc. IMO Sopa.* ea.a Sa. 1. Wain Hille.CA 91145 Ptce. hp : emme.rsu Fulda . (1111A61141 OS SUBSTRUCTURE SITE PLAN 5 OF 13 Fwmit Cfrt OF TEMEGIAIS PERINI INFORSIAnoN AC STREET FOOTAGE GRASS FARAWAY FOOTAGE TOTAL FOOTAGE IIIIS {IFET: G i! WIN( ',CALI ?pOPRlCrAR u wnOvAtirr, N 1115 :€1 C■ CV4itio0,1 MONO IS PASPACIAT at Ne me cif OF OSSIDS Das, 'AI kr■Ans •LA:Oli IIAILESS IS VE:P. •) MINIM PECHANGA ROW c" MEC! MO. 41VPIFORStA11011 — ASS PREPAKIMY C e S tx4.11 C Ct Mg MO. AICIttN NICLIONAT AZOV:SS; 31551 WOLF VALLEY AD TElleCt/Lk CAS= BCE KIX CI MOWN 10010009-15 cable eangInagaring servicets PREXOTT ONAILLAIICAIIONS M(, ICON Sunmada NNI. Woo I. Wok., IRA CA 01)IS Pee.163:011e986.2351 roc No.: (11111)101141•3 SUBSTRUCTURE SITE PLAN 6 OF 13 r VENOM INEELIPSS COPORACTOR TO PLACE I WRENN WIIIIIES3COKIRACIOa TO RACE j I NOTE: - MEALS ^ n DETAL W SCALE tar 1 iza •' '''' !RI 'I...+-J14 , .....,:: !.‘ ' _.L •, ..... .I TV)." . Pga.Y.R.T: .N.tR 1 YPICAL CONDUIT PLACEMENT DETAIL (TRENCH) N.T.S. pf w a PROPRIETARY INFORMATION VINUMIN CON! UML) Pt FMS a€ at OtzithETION VAT.M...15 P.IPPVTAT TPatP: .t.. .11 • .""U•t UTE lank [ PECHANGA ROW fRallIMMTINTORESS) 314/1110LEVALLEYRO. TEMESTAMANIM2 ECG PM 1014MIRRE C.E.S.PROXET M. STAMP. [ 10010009.15 [ --- .........c. VeriEM tyireless PLMEIPREATAD SY: ombiat engineering services, [ PRI3COTT CaVMUNICATIONS INC. ., MCA° IM.Arods 144. OMB I. Mogen IMILCA9130 Plum No- PIIIM■szTR To taw reteMMAICe r at DETAILS par Mom 1 [ OF 13 F�. S£pt0Q' l ti :c ".. - i : C�� !OP Vkw i - • ANTENNA RADOME 2 I — — - I I -- ANTENNA j r _ .. t'AOPNIE t AY.Y INFORU:nON IA Nowak:11 WW1 :(4311:(431111C1'01 �c r«awrol n MC ■ ..: `,• to .. .. , .fit, ill MX PECHANGA ROW /..... ,.......,,,,..... It imeti Cr :fS _ t i i F - i r czi emea scrou 1001000915 • ~' "' .. �... .,.. . . - ..... TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAIL "..:: — -• I 4 - ,IAIO. p_ � 1 1_I VECTOR DETAIL - — 1 POLE TOP DETAIL 5 BRACKET ARIA TO POLECONNECIION 6 SECTION 7 I ':y 'a BASE PLATE 8 SITEMPOINAMIt ii.wralin ei: veriLwireless -- y :. . K - 1��,�.e engineering services PRIM= COW4U141CA11016 VC, 'SCE WuT M. 1 _ � loxcool zu ' , Y'..• P, r .W ..L . r J ■ SCE I&ME IL I N COOEDM11N1 10040 340.1.6 SW SA* 1.1aloix• 1111, CA 01a ...� — — — t:.z` f' � s KA 1 e.' R .�- h �. .. - `.� l �^ k ti , -try , 0'4' : 1 may .......4e ' -- t • .` _ L_ 17 Icr : � �C yrtII MI: POLE INFORMATION & ELEVATIONS 1 t L A � ! '- :•r.,• `t _r_ — , , �:; � ' _ >s . � ? 41 ` - — — 1 _ _.._ � : :,S - -- -. -- - --. =,r •ru sr n ivn: - - - - - ELEVATION • LOOKING SOUTHEAST — 9 8 OF 13 ELEVATION • NORTHEAST 1 0 �f F'': bAO. NJ. MORN RIAG 1. IAN 34N) RAM: IS 5,r; plchES 2. D:OTHERmi(.4:11 GilhO .:ONTIff. 5 zt._ ANT CM( SiDELF, •;;Rtie 1 II:SULA-TC triE 1 AWE %TEMA saoitsp AT II' rGr AND env,' O fl VERTICAL Rod. ME ANTENNA CABLE .940 SHALE BE BONDED r k COPPER Bv5; EAR 1Hi 3 01NT J A , IERPCAL RJ1. ' ;Ps 14:1E1AA LOCATION ttaxim,ZE iT'S SEPARATION mom 1 - X/RX INFEttl.:A OF Tht PICAZ(U 101.LE ).441:(:-INING OXMAN EXPOSC 1LJE 3F SI-SHT) h) 111E SOUTH, !--)601P-5•3 —:E•. :rAyEs- —r • 'I' COAXIAL CcetC.S TO SPLICE AA * 1/2" COAXAL CABLE UN.C. vAULT 7,/8 .:VAXIAL VOTES TO Visa VAULT 1.` ANTENNA WIRE DIAGRAM RF SYSTEM SCHEDULE •t : RF SYSTEM SCHEDULE bM C • ! • • • ! Z.. 10 ets.,:v mie •11" -tt:11 • • , . . 1 •fe J _Sr* I I „ • r it 1 I:: . _ri CPS SURVEY Ch 2 RP INFOIVIATIN • .17 3 PROPRIETARY PCFORMATICH 411L 6 C(41111 . NO V Oil ',It C4 C1.4 :11.■• flier 1) MsE PECHANGA ROW pRO_SPORIODiRESSI MO vow vAUXf MINEOAA. SALM ICE ME Ds Neince CWT WI ITE UM • Orinfixeireless Seabersesftnld It.. boot C.,. /a* CA mi. PING PIWPOSO ces cable engineering services PRESCOTT COMIROCATSP6 tome Swam. NA (41.1.1.1111PFPOLCAP)45 Fr11.11181111541 01 1 RF INFORMATION MKT IIUMSGt 1001000645 9 OF 13 K.F. INFCIRMATICIN (JUN TICAL 11(WtC. I INI II IUN . —......." —.-. - _ . ''— • — — R.F. REQUIREMENTS .... ,.....,:-..* i f 1 --. . 4 . - ..- ,•. t.1;--.:.! 12* -'. , 1/4 'lc , 4.` •, ' _ - - --• 1 fa ! ir-I "- : • " • ',, •'s-:' 'ai . - - . ..1* t .• j ' ' 7Q01.4.4.: - = .•. r..p, _,_ . ..._ • . ' . INICAgnalk - --...- ' • - RIAG 1. IAN 34N) RAM: IS 5,r; plchES 2. D:OTHERmi(.4:11 GilhO .:ONTIff. 5 zt._ ANT CM( SiDELF, •;;Rtie 1 II:SULA-TC triE 1 AWE %TEMA saoitsp AT II' rGr AND env,' O fl VERTICAL Rod. ME ANTENNA CABLE .940 SHALE BE BONDED r k COPPER Bv5; EAR 1Hi 3 01NT J A , IERPCAL RJ1. ' ;Ps 14:1E1AA LOCATION ttaxim,ZE iT'S SEPARATION mom 1 - X/RX INFEttl.:A OF Tht PICAZ(U 101.LE ).441:(:-INING OXMAN EXPOSC 1LJE 3F SI-SHT) h) 111E SOUTH, !--)601P-5•3 —:E•. :rAyEs- —r • 'I' COAXIAL CcetC.S TO SPLICE AA * 1/2" COAXAL CABLE UN.C. vAULT 7,/8 .:VAXIAL VOTES TO Visa VAULT 1.` ANTENNA WIRE DIAGRAM RF SYSTEM SCHEDULE •t : RF SYSTEM SCHEDULE bM C • ! • • • ! Z.. 10 ets.,:v mie •11" -tt:11 • • , . . 1 •fe J _Sr* I I „ • r it 1 I:: . _ri CPS SURVEY Ch 2 RP INFOIVIATIN • .17 3 PROPRIETARY PCFORMATICH 411L 6 C(41111 . NO V Oil ',It C4 C1.4 :11.■• flier 1) MsE PECHANGA ROW pRO_SPORIODiRESSI MO vow vAUXf MINEOAA. SALM ICE ME Ds Neince CWT WI ITE UM • Orinfixeireless Seabersesftnld It.. boot C.,. /a* CA mi. PING PIWPOSO ces cable engineering services PRESCOTT COMIROCATSP6 tome Swam. NA (41.1.1.1111PFPOLCAP)45 Fr11.11181111541 01 1 RF INFORMATION MKT IIUMSGt 1001000645 9 OF 13 s T ..........., ...n. twX- XX *I. 131111.64= - MI': ' •.::" ' tin ..- - - t.m.:./. LIMB- . -. a .,.. .. . iro 0 •0.1. . p i •... • .--- ... 4 .7-_, z- ...dir •INA .. R.^ . ..3&M. ".. -11.—__ ER .., r . o•-•.• ..... .. ... • • uu • ■•••• svaly ..........„... A"--,. 1..... ..4r 4" ttlt•■•_1-111- OW -it/ cr ' ' . 6.41 s Iry E•••••• Ilm 1, I 1 . , I" v.... 4..lEa4it.. 444 wiry . , .bui a . • • - . ' 1 ' ... • • •,: r.•••■■••.• •:•••,,14 4-• EXTERIOR ELEVATION VIEW "A" • , • N:i, . e MW Emma ELevonion vuEvi CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT MANHOLE (MODEL 1624) EXTERIOR EIEVATIONSIDETAIL - 4 7S 51 ‘ — 11 - -:,.., : , : : ::4 . - - ,' 7 v, , ■ , , # . .c.s.,..1 t - •-:,,...,,,,,,,,,i;, -"A , . ' —E.2' .`,... `...,.. . . .... :••• I •, ' ' .. ,,. .:.' •.. 4;,X...;.• II -.11219 I i ■ )1' t kik t '". .; .-- -:::","%. _ '''-' •••,. . , • !;•A, Arg.2 .si .11 .• ;,-;...7.--.7.7---.-- • • 1 [ CUENT TO CUSTOM ORDER PORT LOCATION • EXTERIOR ELEVATION VIEW 'r •\S • , EXTERIOR ELEVATION VIEW "Cr - ETELVICE - --•-• 5'.OWN El 9.5ED • _ • , • LI - t ;Km.. ('L5 • AA NOTE 717 CONTNAC1DID PER =CASTLE 'MAST ML �4, CEV MOVEN Vail' CONDUITS, FITTINGS AMO ABOVE GROOM VENT STACKS SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM CAL DUCT (LOCATED AT 2411 5. I./LAC AVE. 131.001111NOTOK CA SIM; TELEPHONE NO.: (110951074E77) TO ENSURE AINEDUATE MR PLOW FOR CEASE CEV AND MEV ZEKIWINNT P4APORMARE5. 1101):Es RETIARDNOM MISR USE AND NSTALILATON Of OLOCAULE CDR VALETS. OTECASTLE VENT VAULTS ISERE P.ARETOLLT IDOBIEENED TO PROVDE ADEQUATE VENTILATION MD ECHAUSTNG 10 OUR PLUM TO ORNASCONITIOLLED ENVIROMENT PRODUCTS. If YOU °AVOW CONTRACTOR IS NOT PAWN WM IHE MIT VNAT APPLICATION OR INVOLLATION OR lc MUTATE AIN OUESTIONS PLEASE coNrAcT US TIERE NE SOME VEIN setc.Pc WE REQUIREMENTS 114AT MUST SE TAKEN Ilif0 CONSDERARON PRIOR 40 The USE OF IHOPRODUCT THESE PITTOWDBO ARE szorea2soirvaLPREVENTSCIMMOOKSOUENCESFROMINCOMECTMED009 Of POTALLATION %NCH LOUD VOS) OUR ~ROM OR RESULT IRMO:WS EOUPINEIT WHAM HIS IMPEPAITVE MAT THE CONTRACTOR RECEP/ES IP3T4I54fl4f024Mt4244DU.tl.4bVNC444 THE CAYCE PLACEMENT. IP 41 DERSONIED DAT SITE CONSITONS AKE NOT FAVORABLE NE TAN OFFER ALTERNATIVE SCEUDONS. WEN useo PIKVERLY. THE VENT VAULTS WEL FUNCTION AS INTENDED/ND TEE( 716 °SAME OP A MO PROMS AT THE SITE PROPRIETARY IN FORMATiOR PBODIANBI :Nrwor A CFO SO CA ;,11•EIC4 OX4NIAA1 1 moolivitn Of lutist. AC Y 714....0011 tki. Otot Fait el:. , Z1 IC .4442. x4,4 -I5. aft, I t BM W! 1 PECHANGA ROW 4PORINIORTAGEOSSO SOBOWOLF VALLETPLA 1731E0AA.CAKIII2 FOE KlEONIMOIE [EEL FROJFETIO• [ST MI. coitELAPM [All•POPIAW It 15 > It 1(4 1. .TTSTO •1' ' 2 verizonoreless Spar. Mi.. 1405*.,1 Am Int, (A W. ces PUNS POSPAREOIE [ amble engineering services — PRESCOP COMAVAKATION5 MC. MHO fig./...410. S6O5 'Atm ■Oa. CA01541 He... 1111M444? 1 a ,he 0.?..9M WOO* n t HISNI TITLE 10010009-15 [ CEMN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS/ DETAIL rC eliumm OF 13 El 052 O:n MOON • t I_ VENT STACK DETAILS ( • • — —• - - _ DETAIL 'A" _1 20" LOUVERED VENT SANDSTONE FINISH - PART #20SPVA GRANITE FINISH - PART #20SPVAG AIR VENTING 250 SO. INCHES MINIMUM OPEN AREA S.S. NO. 14x1 — ONE WAY ROUND HEAD SHEET METAL SCREWS (4x) AIR VENT - 4 EACH LEVEL (24x) SEE DETAIL l ` °sue 6 \ P. 4. _F'`tsrs � -..• E — TOP CAP INSTALLED ON VENT 19'0 OPENING UNDER CAP AIR VENTS -- AI 11 ' d`_tdTS DEIrA1i_ AIR VENTS DETAIL "A" www.calductcom 2522 LEE AVE., S. EL MONTE, CA 91733 626.575.3135 FAX 626.575.2877 PROPRIETARY $NFORUATION • PIiCAROCI 10.0.A:0 a "5 Sli '1 _ +.1FU;t O• WONZIIII 6 I. MOW" u• LA( * O.;.O.7.W1 WAY INN I. ' tll:•• ii111{T 'C AI A 1rielES1. U :•h:.l • •.t? :+ ATE AMC PECHANGA ROW (PROAINWIT ALMA 11.1119013MILT RR DX POLE P :L POLE D mAnaoT L P?ORCt N+' 10010009 -15 CIE 1'IfO4WIDR — IUXt PFEPAR[DQI. - .if, ine ces cable engineering, Serviee5 YLXOTT CV NMINEA11016 INC. 0410 9eIMeS DIAL 9AA I.Irbn Mk CA Of11: 11w N, (I IINeJ14 Fu M' (t11111lY IN — - -- VENT STACK DETAILS 11 OF 13 L1 . NO. MAIM : '.. : ,, , L., ;4 ,- • :• . ,; ::_.• _ . .. I , . ....:, `,...r" 4 . i ,- - ;;-, 1,- PROPRIETARY IHEORIAATION 15 WOW*: CONIALA51 In 143 sr or ccwireu:nos. (U5116 IT 541Pfni'Olt if nu, Us: C1 D511GPA6 OH NIN 'An An • ,r. ,.... ., 5533 6 srivort. PECHANGA ROW pRELAMARY ADDRESS) 31PA PoLF15.....EY Ro. TOLIYATUn GPM SCE POI I) MAR5SE TYPICAL PED MOUNTING DETAIL "'` ','•,.. :-:- ' ' ' • •.'",'• ' - "- - :..- 1 s 77 _ -.I 2;: a 7. :.•47i • • " -' •-. .: - ..• 0. I I' :: . 1 tn... :t.r.... :: Ir7 .• 'I' 1' -.., .7. 1 _ 1 . -- 17 - - -... ..- C7 - - - I ; __ I r 10010009-15 C Li MUM. NO 1 ,..„..._ ..1 1 ,.._____ : a I 1 ..) ---;.,1 • .,.....,•—• • • - . .1,1 I .. .. . .- -- __ _ .... 4 .. 1 t • , i , . • I i . . ■ ' .: '-'-. --. -- G , , ,...: .., . •• . , • .. ,'. , SON,. „.. . 1 ..:t_ ,-_-:-_e...v.y...--.. . . ,--, • 1 • '. t i -- ' : ATE PIPON.5,11C5. ..v.:!.r.r.•__ :, .......<, tv..-- ..-. •4,. , i • rte-1. , ' . t . . .. . — - — . - - __ • ...-...._. . 200 AMP PACWIC ELECTIUC METER PEDESTAL 1 VeriZgaty/rOleSS 200 AMP PACIFIC ELECTRIC MEIER PEDESTAL (ISOMETRIC VIEW) 71111 ! /11111111/ • , nw . _ . . , 1 • „...... -- +- - ■ - ,.. s Finml, 0 V cable engineering services PRESCOTT COMMUNKA MPS 115.. "AM 9.A.M.0.864 ad. 1.51eics HAACA113. Plum Ho • 11.11,S47/11 Gu KO : (810)t0.1111 r • Rowan. . ..... P:6 t-- • — — — i a. . 4 .- 4 • .' ---- I 1...o. ., -- Tt , . ! e • ., . . - .",1 ''..V, Tl" ....., — v5:1 XV_ EQUIPMENT DETAILS e___,..„....Z _ .1 t • , -5- 1 I s• CONCRETE PAD REBAR DETAIL -- 5 [ SMITNUUMit 12 OF 13 CAA PAO Al AtC156.1 S: . • TYPICAL ANCHOR BOLT DETAIL PROPRIETARY INFORFIAtION IH 1V0lWTlO COWARD M INS SCr Cr .ACIF:+. All OOCCIIDOS 15 P CWV.TAlr 3 WI RC, 1ST -SE OF 05 .05011 OARS Tull TWr 05 CA a,A tiS ru R>1 11.1.IS1 .'. Si /CII 7NNYIEO PECHANGA ROW 3101110010YALLAY All TEKCNACAAIO SCR POI[9MNMeE CIAMIOlICTNO: 10010009 -15 p _ A RY caStAtta fR!!0!lAilwE 15.:JE GAr[: 015A1O[lrs0 M. 'i! WM7[D H^ y. veri reies 16•e1W•CqnM. w,.4 eM.e MMOW/W=OT: gable engineering services PRESONYCOAWAINICATIONSINC- IOMOS00‘00101001 limb I. laWIWACA1711a PlwIIN 01 101•4552 PM Pt. 10,4914W8 J . , , '. � I MEW MCC GROUNDING DETAILS 130E 13 MAW] WAATCIM I 1P St.= _ ...: F:... TYPICAL EXTERNAL VAULT GROUNDING 1 • TYP/CAL ROUND CONC. STREET LIGHT ANTENNA POLE GROUNDING DETAIL 4 CONNECTION OP COAX GROUND KIT TO ANTENNA COAX 6 [QP VI GROUND TEST WELL DETAX. 510E V15 GROUND ROD DETA9. TYPICAL GROUND BAR PAR IS LIS 5 2•NOLE LB GROUNDING LUG 7 PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0085, A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CELLULAR FACILITY DISGUISED AS A STREETLIGHT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOLF VALLEY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 283 FEET EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF PECHANGA PARKWAY (CLOSEST APN: 962- 010 -007) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 9, 2011, Rob Searcy, on behalf of Verizon/CES, filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0085, a Wireless Telecommunications Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0069 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.010.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The proposed use requires a minimal amount of servicing, which will create little traffic. The proposed use is consistent with and meets all the requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; By designing the antenna to resemble existing street light poles, the proposed project is designed to integrate with the existing streetscape. In addition, the nearest residential structure to the antenna is located approximately 400 feet to the east. The use is determined to be compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures. Furthermore, the conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; The project meets the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code. As a result, the proposed conditional use meets the requirements of the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; Support equipment will be housed underground and will thus not be accessible by unauthorized persons. The project has been reviewed and appropriately conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the application for a Conditional Use Permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15303, Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures); The project consists of the installation of a 35 foot street light pole with antennas for wireless telecommunications. Support equipment will be placed within an underground vault. The project is in an urbanized area and will not impact any existing structures. The project will also not impact the adjacent vacant lot. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0085, A Wireless Telecommunications Facility application to allow a cellular facility disguised as a streetlight to be located within the public right -of -way along the south side of Wolf Valley Road, approximately 283 feet east of the centerline of Pechanga Parkway, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Roy Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July 2011, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0085 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Assessor's Parcel No.: 962- 010 -007 (closest) MSHCP Category: NIA DIF Category: NIA TUMF Category: NIA Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements A Wireless Telecommunications Facility application to allow a cellular facility disguised as a streetlight to be located within the public right - of -way along the south side of Wolf Valley Road, approximately 283 feet east of the centerline of Pechanga Parkway PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. On telecommunication towers, equipment, walls or other structures, all graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR RF Transparent Radome Match Corresponding Light Pole PL -9. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -10. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -11. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. PL -13. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing streetlights shall be paid for by the developer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -14. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed bythe applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -15. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions /Information B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B -4. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. At Plan Review Submittal B -5. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -6. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide construction drawings showing the location of proposed facilities in relation to the right -of -way, sidewalk, curb line, and centerline of the street. Drawings shall show all existing improvements including existing storm drains, utility facilities and conduits. PW -6. Any vault surface within sidewalk limits shall match sidewalk elevations. PW -7. Any improvements on private property shall be by permission or easement from the property owner. PW -8. Provide a copy of the Applicant's Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN). PW -9. Replacement streetlight shall be concrete and match the height requirements per City Standard Drawing 800 and 801 and per Southern California Edison standards. PW -10. Trenching and trenching repair shall be per City Standard Drawing 407 and 407A. PW -11. PW -12. PW -13. Support facilities (i.e. vaults, equipment enclosures, utilities) in the public right -of -way shall be placed in underground vaults to all extent. Installation of above - ground cabinets and vaults shall be avoided. New underground telecommunications and electrical conduit shall be placed behind curb in accordance with City Standard Drawing 609. A minimum 30 inches of cover shall be maintained above the shallowest conduit. The vault lid shall be a heavy duty traffic lid acceptable to the Public Works Department. Aplicant shall utilize existing conduit whenever possible per Municipal Code Section 5.12.160. Excess capacity within existing conduits and facilities shall be utilized whenever possible. Applicant shall investigate and identify locations of existing facilities of all utility companies, including underground conduits that are available for shared use. No excavations or directional borings shall be made without research and determination bythe Applicant of existing conduit availability, including contacting and coordinating with owners of existing conduits. PW -14. If it is determined that there are no other existing conduits available for shared use, the Applicant shall certify in writing as such. The written statement shall describe in reasonable detail the efforts made to obtain from other utility service providers the right to use excess capacity within existing facilities. PW -15. Location of any above - ground facilities shall be in compliance with Caltrans sight - distance requirements. PW -16. Applicant shall coordinate the construction of new facilities with other providers in order to avoid redundancy or the construction of new facilities. PW -17. Installation of new conduit shall be by directional boring where possible. Open excavation shall be avoided. PW -18. Water discharge resulting from both construction and underground facility drainage shall comply with NPDES regulations.' PW -19. The City may apply reasonable limitations upon the number of aboveground facilities that may be installed within a designated geographical area. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the structure should be removed or painted over within twenty -four (24) hours of being discovered. Report all crimes to the Temecula Police 24 -hour dispatch center at 951 - 696 -HELP. PD -2. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506 -5132. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below PA11 -0085 Rob Searcy, on behalf of Verizon/CES A Wireless Telecommunications Facility application to allow a cellular facility disguised as a streetlight to be located within the public right -of -way along the south side of Wolf Valley Road, approximately 283 feet east of the centerline of Pechanga Parkway In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15303, Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Eric Jones, (951) 506 -5115 City of Temecula, Council Chambers July 20, 2011 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Lot Area: Site: North: South: East: West: STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION July 20, 2011 Cheryl Kitzerow, Case Planner Planning Application Nos. PA10 -0226 and PA11 -0053, a Development Plan and Variance for Chaparral 3, a proposed 23,137 square foot, mixed use, three -story building with retail /restaurant uses on the first floor and mezzanine, and offices above. The Variance request is to reduce the setback at northeast property corner, as well as the parking setback and landscape requirement along the western property line. The project site is addressed as 28455 Old Town Front Street. Approve with Conditions Notice of Determination Section 15162 Chris Campbell, Walt Allen Architects on behalf of Michael McMillan Specific Plan Implementation (SP -I) Downtown Core (DTC) Parking lot /vacant Open Space (vacant) DTC (Chaparral North and Chaparral retail /office buildings) DTC (Old Town Front Street/ Stage Stop center across street) Open Space (Murrieta Creek) Existinq /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required 0.27 acres N/A Existing Lot Parking Required /Provided: 10 proposed (inc. 1 ADA) 0 spaces required Building Height: 50' 50' max with allowable increases 1 BACKGROUND SUMMARY On July 23, 2010, Mr. Chris Campbell submitted Planning Application No. PA10 -0226 for a Development Plan to construct the Chaparral 3 mixed use building. Based on staff review, it was determined that the project did not meet certain criteria in the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP), and on February 25, 2011, Mr. Chris Campbell submitted Planning Application No. PA11 -0053 for two variance requests that include: (1) reducing the front setback from 10 feet to between 18 inches and four feet; and, (2) reducing the parking /drive aisle setback and eliminating the three foot landscape requirement at the rear of the site at Murrieta Creek. On June 13, 2011, the Old Town Local Review Board reviewed the project and recommended approval of the project with modifications to the rear elevation. The Board members discussed the proposed variance requests, architectural style and requested enhancements, and interface with the Murrieta Creek trail along the rear of the project site. On June 21, 2011, the applicant submitted revised plans to address comments received from the OTLRB. Plan revisions included providing enhanced railing along the balcony at the rear elevation and wrapping the cornice detail from the front and north elevations to the west /creek side elevation. The rear balcony revisions do not adequately address the OTLRB's concerns that the rear elevation is actually a secondary front elevation adjacent to the creek. The applicant revised the balcony railing to match the railing at the adjacent Chaparral North building; however staff and the OTLRB requested the railing match the decorative railing at the front elevation of the proposed building. Staff has added a Condition of Approval (PL -48) that the railing be revised to match the railing material at the front elevation. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with all of the recommended Conditions of Approval, except Condition of Approval No. PL -48 regarding the enhanced railing at the creek elevation, which will be further discussed at the Commission hearing. ANALYSIS Site Plan /Variance Requests The Downtown Core (DTC) land use district is intended to provide for uses that support pedestrian oriented and mixed use development, defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to four stories. Retail uses are anticipated for the ground floor, while office and residential uses are restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street. The proposed project is located in the DTC land use district, along the west side of Old Town Front Street at the entrance to Old Town. The building is designed to provide active frontage along both the street and Murrieta Creek. The ground floor and mezzanine are proposed as retail /restaurant uses. The second and third floors are proposed as office space. Pedestrian access will be provided directly from Old Town Front Street and from a breezeway along the southern property line adjacent to the existing Chaparral North building that leads to an open air plaza between the proposed and existing building. Vehicular access will be provided from the extension of the existing drive aisle along the western property line adjacent to Murrieta Creek. Parking is proposed as 'tuck- under' parking along the rear of the building. The proposed ten parking spaces (including one van accessible ADA) are not required by the OTSP. 2 The Specific Plan establishes a build -to -line for all new buildings. Within the DTC land use district the building is required to be placed 10 feet behind the street side property line with parking areas to be located an additional 20 feet from the property line. The proposed building meets this requirement along the majority of the Old Town Front Street frontage; however, the building encroaches in this build -to -line along the northeastern portion of the site. In this location, the building is proposed to be located between 18 inches and four feet from the property line, where the existing property line jogs back into the site approximately 12 feet and provides an expanded right -of -way. This reduction in the setback is Variance Request #1. Staff has reviewed this setback modification and has determined that it is appropriate based on the following: the existing property line configuration and right -of -way varies in this location, the continuity between the building facade is important irrespective of the jog in property line, and there is an expanded sidewalk and right of way adjacent to the reduced setback. Allowing the building to encroach to the property line in this location does not negatively impact the pedestrian zone as the desired sidewalk width has been achieved through the expanded right - of -way, which varies between 10 to 30 feet along the project frontage. Variance Request #2 occurs along the rear property line at the Murrieta Creek frontage. For properties with creek frontage in the DTC land use district the Specific Plan requires that parking areas be set back a minimum of 40 feet from the creek frontage (with 70 feet recommended) and that all at -grade parking areas be screened by a three foot minimum landscape area along the property line. The proposed project includes a zero setback and no landscape buffer adjacent to Murrieta Creek. The proposed parking area on -site will be accessed from an extension of the existing drive aisle and parking area along the rear of the Chaparral Center and Chaparral North building. This drive aisle is located adjacent to the existing property line and Murrieta Creek (no setback exists as a result of the Murrieta Creek Flood Control Project). The extension of the shared /existing drive aisle is the most appropriate secondary vehicular access since there is no alley or side street contiguous to the project site and access from Old Town Front Street is discouraged. In order to meet the parking setback and landscape buffer, the existing improvements would need to be reconfigured. Staff reviewed this parking setback and landscape requirement and determined that they can be supported based on the following: the future Murrieta Creek Multi -Use Trail will effectively act as a buffer from the Creek, and the project is an extension of the adjacent development and the existing improvements (drive aisle) will be shared and extended. In addition to build -to -line requirements, the Specific Plan establishes allowable building and frontage types appropriate for a vibrant public realm. The DTC land use district allows the following building types: Rowhouse, Courtyard and Commercial Block; the following frontage types are permitted in the DTC land use district: Shopfront, Arcade, Gallery, Two -story Gallery, and Forecourt. The proposed project incorporates the Commercial Block building type and a combination Gallery and Shopfront frontage types. The gallery frontage type is proposed for the southerly portion of the building along Old Town Front Street and the Shopfront frontage type is proposed for the northerly portion of the building. The building meets all design requirements and standards, including building height, access, landscaping, size, and massing for each of these styles. The application is consistent with the goals of the Old Town Specific Plan and has proposed an effective design to create a vibrant streetscape. 3 Architecture The architectural design of the building is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan. The three -story building incorporates a Western Frontier style with Victorian influences along the south and east facades and an American Mercantile style along the north and west facades. The Western Frontier style with Victorian influences includes design elements such as mansard roof, finials, and second floor balcony. A portion of the building adjacent to the existing Chaparral North center incorporates horizontal siding to provide a transition and connectivity to the existing buildings. The Merchantile style incorporates a brick facade with a ground floor arcade, and repetitive fenestration at the second and third floors. Decoration is limited to corbels, cornices, and window trim. Balconies are proposed along both the Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek frontages. The balcony along the street is on the second floor and is accessible from the office uses. The balcony at the Creek frontage is at the Mezzanine level and is accessible from the retail /restaurant use. A mural is proposed along the north elevation which will be visible when entering Old Town. A design has not proposed at this time but a Condition of Approval (PL -10) has been included requiring City review and approval of the mural. In addition to the new construction, the project also includes revisions to the Chaparral North building. These revisions include new service /ADA ramps along both the north (side) and west (rear) elevations of Chaparral North building. These ramps are proposed to meet ADA requirements due to the elevation change between the existing and proposed buildings. Landscaping /Right -of -Way Improvements The project proposes to install landscaping within the public right of way along Old Town Front Street, as well as small planter areas within the project site. Consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan, Liquid Amber trees are proposed along Old Town Front Street. Decorative planter pots are also provided on the second floor balcony. A Condition of Approval (PL -42) has been included to require automatic irrigation for these planter pots. Other improvements to occur in conjunction with the project include replacement of the wood boardwalk with stamped concrete along Old Town Front Street per the OTSP and the relocation of existing utilities and meters along the project frontage to ensure that the pedestrian zone is not impacted by utilities. A Condition of Approval (PL -54) has been included to require that the relocation of the existing utilities and equipment within the right -of -way be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services and the Director of Planning. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on July 7, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Old Town Specific Plan Amendment EIR and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). 4 The project site is located within a Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Area (MSHCP) Criteria Cell; however, no conservation is proposed or required. A Joint Project Review was conducted and the project has been determined to be consistent with the MSHCP. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F): The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Specific Plan Implementation (SP -l) and the Downtown Core designation in the Old Town Specific Plan. The Downtown Core (DTC) land use district is intended to provide for uses that support pedestrian oriented and mixed use development, defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to four stories, The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Variance (Code Section 17.04.040.F) That there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code due to physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that are not shared by other properties in the zone. Variance #1 — The subject property configuration along Old Town Front Street is characterized by irregular lot lines and a variable right -of -way. The northeast property line jogs' away from the street to provide an increased right -of -way and pedestrian area. Strict application of the build -to -line required by the Old Town Specific Plan in this area would create practical difficulties (varied storefront planes along Old Town Front Street) and unnecessary hardships (additional 12 -foot setback where an expanded right -of -way already exists), Variance #2 — The OTSP requires parking setback requirements and landscaping requirements for lots with dual frontage (street and creek) that should be applied to this project. The proposed variance request to reduce the parking setback and eliminate the landscaping along the western property line can be supported given the need for secondary vehicular access that is available through the extension of the existing drive aisle from the adjacent property. The landscape buffer will eventually be provided off -site with the construction of the Murrieta Creek trail. Strict application of the parking setback and landscaping would create practical difficulties (lot configuration /depth and parking setback requirement would effectively prohibit on -site parking) and unnecessary hardships (reconfiguration of the existing drive - aisle). 5 The circumstances and characteristics for the variance were not created by the applicant. Variance #1 — The irregular lot line configuration was not created by the applicant, Reducing the front build -to -line setback results in a more consistent street frontage design where the buildings are located adjacent to the right -of -way, Variance #2 — The circumstances and characteristics for the variance request were not created by the applicant. The existing improvements along the rear of the adjacent buildings to the south were constructed in compliance with previous codes. The request to extend the existing improvements to the project site results in the need for the requested variance. The variance does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. Variance #1 — The proposed variance to reduce the build -to -line would not grant special privileges which are not available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to other properties in the vicinity. The intent and goal of the 0 TSP is to create an active, pedestrian zone and given the expanded right -of -way in this area this is still achieved with the variance request. Variance #2 — The proposed variance to reduce the parking setback and eliminate the landscaping along the west property line would not grant special privileges which are not available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to other properties in the vicinity. The project site is unique in that the site is bound by developed parcels to the south, open space to the north and no alley or side street to provide secondary vehicular access. The variance places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties. Variances #1 and #2 — The proposed variance will not adversely impact adjacent properties and therefore no additional conditions are necessary. The project site is adjacent only to public right -of -way, the Riverside County Flood Control District, and other properties owned by the applicant, and the proposed variances will not adversely impact these properties. The variance does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone. Variances #1 and #2 — The proposed variances are for a reduced build -to -line setback, parking setback and landscape requirement, and not to change any allowable uses. The proposed project includes uses that are consistent with the OTSP Downtown Core District. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Statement of Justification Notice of Public Hearing 6 City of Temecula • 0 250 PA 10 -0226 This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. 500 Feet AREA CALCULA1lON INDEX TO DRAWING Walter R. Allen, AIA 29493 O3i To.el Ff9M 9ffee; Sate 201 TmrcpLL CA 92590 m MS 230301 h /9511990.x20 •Iles. 41 .f U U I•. Y. V. :rbuM meat. ;w. : ! + \ /(� /J ^J' / / /(J /7� [�/!/�� /��f V HQ L � UUQ ICJ �J 26 446 �Of�LD TOWN IS� �F`RON STREET' U L5 �f5 V' UL IN V� /�J cJ�6V° O A.P.N. 922 - 026 -033 WO, YtaVrf NW C - cceYEVrvN. 6RAm775� o. 9T 51571316 I.AIi OMR/ftlN AR, PLAN 10.1.1../.• u+a As......... !L moo MA `� ra o nom.. .•• wa ...... A.. M. RAN •2 a 6R0047 FLOOR PLAN 0303 kuANNI PLAN e30! 36020 FLOOR n./,if axon 11.1W FtAH PLAN 4205 ROOP . RAN 0501 perot 0503 0.'TAL3 0'05 O[.LS W.. 1...•••b. 0.81•03/..•••• n4C..MAMV- an,.. E 1 .l'.1 R( ..•, ••1• . ?7 -- —t r.: g I �� r �f iw ua," — �� ! S Mny f � 9�j ! j� S -tip QQ tltl iSAt ) s.: : "{ �� • iiK� el tl! ;d ''` c�I .. . -. - _ ;' _- _•. -- _ ti n• • '{ ' r .. . /.r .— r.. -�• ' filmic ' f 41:40.'1.- i6 Er. El 0 / ` ��R :lL f I I� tl Y � ,•1 f ( � `� , ' , � P t ® • y . I _ - _.- �� � < � . . ' I r - .7 • , 1 ..L lf - ti = -A .. .._. Pte ' `. ) \.r.::�.. yi.. l 1 � ~'S� - SY. 7 , . ��� INFORMAMON .40.4 CODE ANALYSIS ° ° 6310.1fat vow • tam.. 3. mt.. .......... ........ ............ • . • .an ' y . roc <..0.w.n. .a y Chaparral 3 PROJECT INFORMATION 4.1.. a rovvO « .w•, p .. ts m a ..w.....~.. -w 10.4E 11320316.30/C w aarsiorrar .0M • m t., • • .... m rm�,�.. aeuaa� MAASS IMY••••1 11.01.31116 MK .wrraw..ae.w meanviw •0•700 Vet 6.'''..H, a • -1 il 9 �� I ' R ... ..ru..+w...sc ex :..ne:�:ro Y.s+wRro� =any 11. ...o A�MW..nM• Am el.Wor .001..... 1'. — VICINITY MAP z —_ -- - - __ ` ^- ,. - -- • -_.ate � Yr. ?:C_ - .. ,- :764► .���. +va►� "— v Few.....,.. .a. .. ,o . w o m.Aw .u! 1.... n M 41.14 /,!1! -T • • ..M.d 101/41I.1 a<K uwrs,.aw..vm w� >trl. aaa. 1 ,i 5 SITE �� t �� } .....s,.... a t101 LEON. MOM* Q � • � � wya(..�e .iJ. u W.XYQ/111 Y« 20' 10' 80' 40. S. t. % 23,YS'::y N.. �.�....K..,n. �..'•• . • b mm�ri� mln, , � dnsn4 PW ' .+` : OLP T00' TIW'T ET$ELY r»sf,.0 AWlO'AKx10 ► • *Mg form/MP. APPJSCNIL SECTION A PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN sane. Iwo CONCSMU 0.x! .anlro e TOeo muxce x.,n 1.�� •az 1 Caulata SEE T1�,. .r•. - • 1008SJ EX IT NOT A PART .. _ WI oat. _. 41YY•_— __ -_ 1 ___ __ ____ _ w_N•Y_ n.FIY•1.1 -_ ____ .___ - _ mod_- - - NOT A PART MIJRR!ETA CREEK I OLD_ ILIWN FRONT STREET no SAPPED PWXO U W M.. V ••• ■••• \•••e •1•• t ..www.n . w n•n .w wo Now .mlwae.wa•.T ry • Nw ..... A Am n way ....r. n+rn ir we• ALIT y - .....,,... CITY OF TEMECULA MA .•••• PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN CHAPARRAL-3 PART -0220 IN .Isor • eets.I-41 . Mt0a71P b t J pp ae �aord'ILL mly. ' wore., 4 on' 01.11 • e,0X100, 0 per i „TP i.K EI4iC1t.IN Wot1tutht4wltiol Nr.• cad sopieV{jW 1101'4# Pm AoP *J 1, sp#f4 4' WI �tv ctPe1P11.h loedb• ;(') lMtii.otio APf!1 lo S (WIMP P" . Decorative Tree Grate: re. (1N14 AM•NAon 6904410 eMONO: _ MOM M' . 111421 414m NNA,t MI...OMPIr.i*Y tl 2 jj C *NATul•: 1 � •••I ....6.100. WW1.A.e,Mxlr44nw. - 0404 .1: 2 A.. f 0.11 •04.1..,..11/00114 1111 - NOW Prrer1o411a rtr vow*, *, ea __. 010 miftc.09a."%il, a:43Zt� Ist7P7.• AIM is. `t wr rove. u�Y -1 tI� W tah to sit reMU+av Pottery Schedule: 01 .l A0/1M.NNew I11 411' ?011 Lee.. NV. 2122024010 p Q4nIIIY:1 C o.: TIM) I4171sor�tNG 1 . ( 7 WvTFi. 1f tn�.t(ai � I C04124441012111416 C000 1 Colon 111(1 C0•100220: 00211124021 (Ochs.* 3 . 040c Y00 NO12. M041002PAIUILMLlICrlf SJ UM.I , l I C114 r Yalu 1•10411744011 1 d0T1LL 411,44401147141411 1 nmll'541100101'1.1:101.x* Of CIAYI'Nlr PM w I. OAMNgt EXACT *reek Va 11DIIIMMT•W 10 NAP MINI Of C0!41421C IMl •s•s4at0121100M•PS•1r11M01rU•OIfYI ROIPC101. eillaSeleXe QwRi141 040.:".4 f _" "hi.AI =H1dIyY{1lri ffI��E,{yyr.j�t (N /N, iYrt1G 1.It54. trot 11101. ihi 4f2M•W(IIOA1Y1 Cm.4140.101•14224X24 7 PP 1 G LIST TreeslI'elms MA 44D24...4.u.1 LAC 41 U..4.4....'Is•wl.M•I 2101 L••••••.•YW44001. " Shrubs l Pereanieb •Ot ...ma. 0.4141 m .**002,0 tr 12', NNA. Menu I ap.<0 2 1Iw 1114 112. 044401.000.I. YSO• WUf 1.04 4.R. •11211 N..•MTMP.A.r 1110414 nI•YA.M iw � w 1 2241 ..050 (...'I. Potted Material <NAM C44.4 4414 Wee *re -.ewe n1 141110241 ll ••Ima M. 1144444144.1.1•C 1.p C Planting Notes: • NO NA101MG.M1n1U110S5WHIR 11 IUOIWA0Ift41TA0 . 4L1464110.00ARPemC' • NLM1•nw4144242LL10ANI1a *aaa010M MOMU I.* onto* Moles* teem 1sT •MNTAMMMO•a11at0M.IMtsouLtru• law. 10•tAtl1f1••MlUt 14111112110•4104C4110111141/ na001a•2 IMAMA111 • ALLL10I1U0P0AA0ll0•S MONO MOrEC RONMTAIMDPYL'ONI *Ml000NINOIAOIICI C1M'STPL'CIWI* All.6 I*II014141 TO Mew ;memo ewer lie le n1 11•Osetle NC1e0IATt410Ir BMW. 000,111(I3 00.24444,AA'Y11O0211.044LO4 OAl240* 102007 Ot4>:WKI1.110M.0NRI.NS4110 21U0W.Dtfl01•AMM MXTWNIM01AS2. El011N0IUNW14 wmali ICUIWM000K1nl' OY0111MAr11A(UO•m11. vNCTYPCANOSNENATLPAI. • .WN?.a.D4LLw1u1004.411ma .100402.4112 ATALLlo•L Immo C 0X1024 ANn 219X0011.0111W110•101'IKR N NOV • Kx101CI4N OV 111172114411 rases AT TMEf]UUFEOENMOU DAY • •100NnAC10t1NNLW2NONANO PAY roam me AnnwawetNAXroaeamu are le • 0 W IMO 1 0 112141 W I.11I0 NINATCMMCl0N 001 be .6 1 .Not a TOR 124 e. 420 C1 N100.Tn2O4 cy 10413. NMO ?MOAnru1rlu M.U0 10 e . 414014 L 12142. 214214CmNOrAll. 444 .46400 YON note .WIYM.Tn mal .OLYnCl144MAMINIPMLNw1.Cbf. 5124CINPM MIIYINALYAIOA1 w1111101JTO 1410241 1X1 tt2ASUW4 aw.LPe 41112 T 210100 NT:. 4441441 TOm041117 MUM11.1SIAPMte0 ANY 2W0.4LM404Ant TMO1T11. MALL M. GUCCI W WMm144.4.411[44 01.141nA1•nM1.44•1ACr001T0 W 41 NM •1' TO 1110•XLCNI V01.4414121104.114111.12 A EEOr MUNI 400001 00 01010 CW, W 0• OTA11.•S1.••0xL40•MMMro OPMY1110 14 121 01010 010 r1u6UANOt • I M M Y calle llx IY.YMAt010•C.0011L ALL Ieresiwes A•eo•1e000 , • MA U.r SMPAMYMSMIOR A ONUS. ouNEM.irn SM. 1 r*al CUMIN 01041200422100410X4141 1L*1.4OWN1111[.10/14.M TIPS lr.TO•wa11tlALPCArU20M.4META00.44 n41rc 114404•4 0M 040X16Uu r laTrAN 1uulSYAw2NP • I N6104A NMNIM11M11 1/ 0sI1MVA •O1.AM10t »WINONMISw 1.COIN P 0? TO 21.11.1111.102 T2 2A2 A 630,TW4 011* A0 41 11122041 0 CUNT 1 44110!22 • au 12110LT imp...220N 10 at 041•••••14211 40111.24 rearm. maul 0.40.1MI2.4 • AI.l IA02CAM 0MA0 I.44,4,. 0&4W Ml•lY0x MI0CM S ••••••.m I 1 1.012)0 1.oS • rlpvl00Aa11WN1 . 0.41.4NnN:10CCLTY'In.AO•INdD 0.11211rd1AUPOn 10014IIANM4W • A2.I0101.14 NONJAWl•C01ANt1S1: V LANOXA 1 C00111411011 1O n• 1.nm .1.MO w01U01.121n14 4224.1001. 14. e.leaunTM Oe [ rrema 04 20 4102 41.0111([[.*M1C0M1M1.11.441.14104104. CTM 1.11.441.14104104. N V1040 NW. OWA241t1 ,22 11nr.. 2 Nf LLt1X1•AOAr et me W mat . m etr • woo. 211200011 e10RrIW491 M.N... 04 nu. CM•00:4. MUM IN ANTQL111.0 AS TO 111MM0.AN002 tlI RILM.11L00•MIMOIP01x1m 0109 O4NCC 0100CC Irligotinn Notes: • 01 not AUCOYATIC1N1LUOINII noer1. mere* 60t CA1. , All. 1 •0121 AND 0NTIU0 WLa 111L.1.0 4 MWOttM v.42LIOCAI.SIATEl f1N'�MLC4C0 AI I. TUE NANO. to I00.1140IDwIrN coy STANDAR. M1•YIANUDODIINWMIM • A4•41. rUNIVYi1NML• r 110041411.110 AULSTAOLR WYOl1C101.412 ..0101401.101.110141.Ef UNICMICN 01411x041111 YAUAOLL 2104 41.4111104/ 141e *LOVER • MItin l0CATIOWSO CnY O0..1•.87.1Lre .D AN0Ylu6nn sYwl.:lv0104.11U IlANOIIM0.nYNY I SY0RMK.LU 1.NO•r.AN.INUCYl1l • 121e1M'w11.1 mrd14.01414441220nOw224CNY•1111 1011111. •C04140 Y T0C00104.4.4.000Gl1. AI21M914CIO.IX441011 4210PINa1120A.0 .CYJIDN 001004 Yl1M 0040 • 1fon.s 10111411211!111 melee owasS14U.•. ev INN* • I.MCIONIO1MAC10211p4/gYMTMR4 0000014t1•0100 Tq MtP1 411�: .40011aMi4pN1401224M24.1.4 Yn•sml•MAIV.NNCC • ere T.WMNDLL000f. rereCe aeolDte •• M-CO.ANO. • T•.IaaPla14421•ngo.lAMIM nom X14601 Yuan n20414442 112700•41 • 111L4I 0 %N•u(040 NflALY 44241 4400 O •QOMIv,4114.. NAWIRT„mpIOOnMC 1444.4 C1 XT • U utona sal. SIMM1 it* TOWI0IMU •0oOM•MPpismul1MSUweosto a. LDWI 4 erfoLea0U11AW<O W11111 teare r.0Wa0Ole0. • AIL DOwoave4Tw slb•6 atoaro lW1I Irearla24N14 PITr 421NYlenIL <ltY4.T(3 To moron 412041.0 1241104121X0 2X0 Vx2LCYSW Y X02014 • 1MNIACN c WM , 1•UAMIIY • .1.1.0424.10 NC AYL41L •END•nMFnIO peMMCWAmk021044CY, AU ?1Ua WwwwoiXX. setae. PMLL O . Pm 0 4 Mr err 1. mane 10.0.0 M.NI.O11N0 *0 I. M1u•*.WJ0ISW. Ny11MEM.11OTN0 nD AN IXCTCOUI 0ICMI . YII NOW. IPOPLS4fX[01010,A4WIMl w 00I usv01NML121.00[44 /404(. • etureKAn4okt SMALL DEOWILANIallee nalw 4100 YMMCIte AT TO 012 .12411.0401111041).411•220114 Neon oI 0NCYG Y0 0fb100KM1e211AL ntaire n. 1 teb T. 0ettaar ce rnwar mu. 0 weOetWAMYrne 04 • 01.1411. 4410101 0Of NCY2WAT2MAGCYCL13TO010U1102 .4LOP24•E TO 22£ General Notes: • okuonu*UL.MOSELTORil01Y natoorCI00LLt0I.1TA• stuuo.Cnv100 2OV1240101fA41.1.4.040W110 WIN MOVIES 04011OP10C20.01404024 04 01 1.04010 0141. 1001 •nCAT W N 1 11WM I1 EOS NO0.10 N.K 0X1 M 0 LCMILn 1012.000 SI W A nC CO24111110110 •nl l mE CNN V l42.44/6044102200 • .400OV122/1.0121140•1 111.0 AN•1MExp11A'Ol4!YICAMN1AlU4LL•E COOAOMOntmer mascot° or 11XMATOratr 01 recce, reeown. 11 .0t11d. 0116 00.:•••••• L.1 101041. 00r2121IJ1.NAME C11111401 OUANtITY 91(22 104[414 1844140 Inc M'MUx NA 1 00004 • s.MC.1N•N 1 MX I 0.4040.10 ; K. I40C ;4•.0t. • 1046 10 Wye. 1 1NL 000 Wow. 1 100, wet reweer*e $ Wet X02 • .!. M 11 MAL 1000 r wo 1 Ma. 11 oc. W.n 1 ISA. 10011 042011100040 Met t W0[ 44.44. WU WOG wow.** M MLL Glee 414 ea I 1100. 1 MLL We CSD 11 -0001 OC1e r0NARta1 S t!CL DIt mlwttI au ortrrtirir WO Glr a*uc m IOCW W4. , y. PM1Gf n0.M4 U � rcsrulyM. IF•r$VI W6Ewgsb qw•x W PtS*RpNR T wo« wuv c.a MOD \ \ \\ nwarav nrx PO..1 sm.uG •o w N.r.ratt ro R N. Fat MP MST., .1 raWMe U rM. �ti_ r(�LGA1 11PI T F0.aID TU [ y ai aow n1,:Y.M ai Cl satPOa•Pp.S•Y[i �� + � suwF rr 04� Nom KW frw 0/ Ps estate_ .OaD.m.IZaS.Y4 nMr61 nru •DCSUnc 1 .20. tr.. 1 Urr a ' ' TWt r0 u' P 8:10 1 \l e cP. acc v Susses n av a A... Dru IR S..a6E mdO . 0 0 1 , 4 O - ti: xuRln s n.Amvs ie r et ay.� .iav�e ^ ao w .+c,Yr ., I , ar , .:1O.1IG led ��ll une wox+in � • At - ; �- -� 1 1 1 1. - J 1 role. /•00/12010 ■ K b1 PIMA Cast. sO MM . a1o.G. �� ,1— ""' ' 7 Iw. Imo, yy 4047154, - ;ilata• ,fi i V V t fV � [O » ii Gong VAVL 154+3 NH•a 13µO r £X e K rD t•'[O 4 'D E wa W wc.aw Nast rn p n w tees a ro wre.+u sums aew mou om 1Ag11Y.TR.ntYM -� :- .A � CMV6 6.®ty ♦ c1At M AJ&O tN 0017410.10 N rat 1wP •10001. Mn 0a una e.a !v cwPecrµ Paloala .etc •r -atGw• SITE PLAN / - -- --�- — 7 / enema W.1•4 as \ / Wst1OCKWL PAN& ON fit-0.M MIRRIETA OHS 0 rag M MAVr110 1.1.0 '0KM aODPI¢i40r 0 L. f newewax r 00 MOW mOMV os1. V PCA k OLD TOW FRONT STREET IZ{ (W ...1.03 04 rC $0 1,111.0 AS AS 0 NAO.. GDM soar WV. INI cE rd —r D.•4 ..raw e1..r 1 Jews..• a 0..0110•■ a101 U erMAflL anra'p TO 2412221 N Ltt'. ",.tUL 1ann�l uta Q -Y OIrQMO .. ILMI • f{RCRtWA op w.T 'NA Beam neat 100,n Rini X A a.roe;.w e:, wm .ugm W M,, TAY 022 w0.:' WT aeG R - .ow ry:.iaxr O MTh rtr M rW A•4. RErK LI A '_PAGE wacar • mT Enmett1 -n r IV' ,ltd 041220 AMR STOW rpmt .Wfl Marc r... 64.121 radar MAIO 1.111122 RR`MnOrt..e..w ok re.222... 2.422.40 TS - rue w.atrm.r 00.4 NAMPA 1r API' .1,•etriwa 1 2 a201 CAT STAIR MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN at.JS Rom M! 2,0a Y hr 1 , r • • COVERED • i t Mr..4 CAD. IO, tlNA,IM ..CO. SUVA p_ — A a202 ee S flflNuhI " 44 21. SCLOND /wog rt.A.N MOM M1OPtAN../. ¶71.1I T. • 1. .' OFFICZ LEA`X SPACE 3.44 Kr 0" co co 1 _c 1 a -queen 0. (wry Fabir a203 r . t• P ' 74' P4' fl4 rLGGR PLAN t4 !4' VJ' d-ie .w Tr ••• fIWJa'Y IIO VC61 nw. ..e.. .iolr +. 1 1.02,...,E OI..t , MI fY.Y 4w PAWN dsit EN 1 a204 3 • .00, PLAN F Hm 1.! WV. ttriATMI ,r lOur 00 CO Moo • OWN is 0 a205 NOV 0521. • • PPR HA_ EMS NTI CHAPARRAL •Payo ,r 1Ji CEWIR NORM 1 4UlliMMIOCPI10 1 001:0=14 0 0. 4. .1. t• ve CFC: ATI ano II! 0 lo rcl ufg_g_g_Rm 0 c.> KEYNOTE& EATEROR PINISH Kme..,a,A, nuvra. mompe v egt..e, • eAnar,...r 0 WC. OR.1•40.0. SOMA 0 HCO.rNC co,. sappu. N., pc. 0 ,,.rw.c SOMA PAGanG.L onnv .41 1 ANC r.407a 6114 ••A‘rte I#O pale 0 MIA NOCy 1 Ic,t.a pat,141.04.7■17 7.41..7x1V,1761,0 0 OCC.4 VOCTE 7 PrJr„Art OK, 7_14/7., ,0.7 Inr VAL TIMT (PLYOLVETA CREEK ELEVATION) 0 EAST (MONT STREET ELEVATION) o WM IMO. MOCKS Ott.1.6 • WW1, PAM TIM IANT COLO. WO, 0 C.O. WOO.. UAW MO" TRIN /AIM CAL.% VA, 1.447 IteCKM77 7/111,51.¢17. - /O. 1110.0.ff fu IR wiaggia tifr Sfb•C VFW:, ••/.7:44/71■17 iE coornroys 51PITA GOIMANII0 MCC. TMI $4 (WA: 114. • "W4 OtrAti r441 c"Nrest.ft wet. ace.... PAM ItMe rAllt NeNcy Roy. nwp LLCM PIPAN r+ MUM RUH =Ira6i ,1111111111 11 IIILA "", " 111'11 'I' 1111111111,1i 111111 III ti #144 _TAKYLA 471.0. (..71.0“..81%.0}.& t4r&lWC vot•rww uurt suo 1•411 VIS, PAW MCA wear /MR COUP. V. .ReRAINT trr 1 +111.1111 , 1■1111'11.111111.1111 , 11 1 1 , 11111111 1 111 , 11 , 1111 , 111.1116 , Wr 20}33 1771 9 '7,55 T a/ , 1 HoRNI (OMR SAPCE ELEVATPTAH SOUTH (CHAPARRAL NORTH ELL'VANON1 sat• • e...T 4009C1a/. LO., MOM NIA( 11,4111.4 ME? Re* as a 94 =Mat MORIETA C.P.EtX PPP* CeP 1,1 PPP PPP Oft 1 AP IWO. MN a301 tMA•GEO PLAZA PLAN tons eml O4OBNrb went.. KI MYATFA:Ot 0 OALLCRY STORCPORNT 2 - P1ND SCAM SAROCN HALL 0.L'VATION PROM PARKINS Y•• I - OCGORATTVC Hr.R273OAPE • PLAZA, CRAP NORTH RI SAGKOROAIO MY 1 lw•l r1gYlC WOE Nfe•fMe 7 et4 LaIMIfO�YMON! !>TL W` • ILO' Ad WAAL /*P. &.. wr Kf4Mm*COCW A/ I r wart, ' SO VVAIGI6MJ AW SWAM we. WPAI ECCae I I. .7.11 PAW SNK( ATOI r 1t!fNE 5 - HIND SCAM GARDEN WALL CLEVATION FROM PLAZA wm GaANwN 00.191.110 561■310.1. NCR fIEOr M. 5NOPPRONT STORCFRONT Ne VALPI 16.4:01 WLL Iw •M r....w iiiA+r Owro Prar a302 Mill 111 IiI1IJ.P 11111111!_ 1i�1(fiii +i ?I! ji(jul1�lu Nam iii p�l� iq Illilttll IIN 1111(11 lid IS 1 111111! 11 0,101 1 O poly Meer a303 PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA10 -0226 AND PA11 -0053, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR CHAPARRAL 3, A PROPOSED 23,137 SQUARE FOOT, MIXED USE, THREE -STORY BUILDING WITH RETAIL /RESTAURANT USES ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND MEZZANINE, AND OFFICES ABOVE. THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS TO REDUCE THE SETBACK AT NORTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER, AS WELL AS THE PARKING SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. LOCATED AT 28455 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET (APN 922 - 026 -041). Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 11, 2010, the City Council approved the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment and EIR. B. On July 23, 2010, Chris Campbell of Walt Allen Architects, on behalf of RCM Capital Partners LLC, filed Planning Application No. PA10 -0226 Development Plan Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. On February 25, 2011, Chris Campbell of Walt Allen Architects, on behalf of RCM Capital Partners LLC, filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0053 Variance Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. D. The Applications were processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Applications and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. F. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA10 -0226 and PA11 -0053 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F): A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Specific Plan Implementation (SP -I) and the Downtown Core designation in the Old Town Specific Plan, The Downtown Core (DTC) land use district is intended to provide for uses that support pedestrian oriented and mixed use development, defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to four stories. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Variance (Code Section 17.04.040.F) A. That there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code due to physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that are not shared by other properties in the zone; Variance #1 — The subject property configuration along Old Town Front Street is characterized by irregular lot lines and a variable right -of -way. The northeast property line jogs' away from the street to provide an increased right -of -way and pedestrian area. Strict application of the build -to -line required by the Old Town Specific Plan in this area would create practical difficulties (varied storefront planes along Old Town Front Street) and unnecessary hardships (additional 12- foot setback where an expanded right -of -way already exists). Variance #2 — The OTSP requires parking setback requirements and landscaping requirements for lots with dual frontage (street and creek) that should be applied to this project. The proposed variance request to reduce the parking setback and eliminate the landscaping along the western property line can be supported given the need for secondary vehicular access that is available through the extension of the existing drive aisle from the adjacent property. The landscape buffer will eventually be provided off -site with the construction of the Murrieta Creek trail. Strict application of the parking setback and landscaping would create practical difficulties (lot configuration /depth and parking setback requirement would effectively prohibit on -site parking) and unnecessary hardships (reconfiguration of the existing drive - aisle). B. The circumstances and characteristics for the variance were not created by the applicant; Variance #1 — The irregular lot line configuration was not created by the applicant. Reducing the front build -to -line setback results in a more consistent street frontage design where the buildings are located adjacent to the right-of- way. Variance #2 — The circumstances and characteristics for the variance request were not created by the applicant. The existing improvements along the rear of the adjacent buildings to the south were constructed in compliance with previous codes. The request to extend the existing improvements to the project site results in the need for the requested variance. C. The variance does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity; Variance #1 — The proposed variance to reduce the build -to -line would not grant special privileges which are not available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to other properties in the vicinity. The intent and goal of the OTSP is to create an active, pedestrian zone and given the expanded right -of -way in this area this is still achieved with the variance request. Variance #2 - The proposed variance to reduce the parking setback and eliminate the landscaping along the west property line would not grant special privileges which are not available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to other properties in the vicinity. The project site is unique in that the site is bound by developed parcels to the south, open space to the north and no alley or side street to provide secondary vehicular access. D. The variance places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties; zone. Variances #1 and #2 — The proposed variance will not adversely impact adjacent properties and therefore no additional conditions are necessary. The project site is adjacent only to public right -of -way, the Riverside County Flood Control District, and other properties owned by the applicant, and the proposed variances with not adversely impact these properties. E. The variance does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the Variances #1 and #2 — The proposed variances are for a reduced build -to -line setback, parking setback and landscape requirement, and not to change any allowable uses. The proposed project includes uses that are consistent with the OTSP Downtown Core District. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan and Variance Applications: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Old Town Specific Plan Amendment EIR and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA10 -0226, a Development Plan and Variance for Chaparral 3, a proposed 23,137 square foot, mixed use, three -story building with retail /restaurant uses on the first floor and mezzanine, and offices above and PA10- 0070, a Variance to reduce the setback at northeast property corner, as well as the parking setback and landscape requirement along the western property line at 28455 Old Town Front Street, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20 day of July 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20 day of July 2011, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Patrick Richardson, Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application Nos.: PA10 -0226 and PA11 -0053 Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. General Requirements Planning Application Numbers PA10 -0226 and PA11 -0053, a Development Plan and Variance for Chaparral 3, a proposed 23,137 square foot, mixed use, three -story building with retail /restaurant uses on the first floor and mezzanine, and offices above. The Variance request is to reduce the setback at the northeast property corner, as well as the parking setback and landscape requirement along the western property line. The project site is addressed as 28455 Old Town Front Street. 922 - 026 -041 Commercial Office & Retail Commercial Service Commercial /Office & Retail Commercial The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan. PL -7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Old Town Specific Plan EIR PL -8. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL -9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -10. The design of the future mural proposed along the north elevation shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director through a Minor Modification application. PL -11. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL-1 2. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -13. The applicant shall paint a three -foot by three -foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. PL -14. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL -15. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. PL -16. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. PL -17. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. PL -18. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL -19. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. PL -20. All on -site landscaping, including within the right -of -way, walls, fencing, and on -site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. PL -21. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- design meeting to discuss design perimeters and obtain Temecula Community Services District Landscape Standards. The street tree (ROW) landscape plans submitted for consideration for Temecula Community Services District maintenance shall be in conformance with the Temecula Community Services District Landscape Standards. PL -22. Construction of the street tree (ROW) landscaping and equipment relocation shall commence pursuant to a preconstruction meeting with the developer, Temecula Community Services District Maintenance Superintendent, Building and Safety Inspector and Public Works Inspector. Developer shall comply with City and Temecula Community Services District review and inspections processes. PL -23. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the street tree (ROW) landscaping until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the Temecula Community Services District or other responsible party. PL -24. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing streetlights /equipment shall be paid for by the developer. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL -25. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL -26. Double detector check valves shall be installed internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right -of -way, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. PL -27. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -28. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground- disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. PL -29. At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. PL -30. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre - grading report with the City of Temecula (if required) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity observation. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in PL -29, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the appropriate Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities in consultation with the project archaeologist. PL -31. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in PL -29. PL -32. The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. PL -33. All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. PL -34. If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological /cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and /or City Council. PL -35. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -36. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL -37. All downspouts shall be internalized. PL -38. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -39. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi fora minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure, which will require inspection of irrigation installation of open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head -to -head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicantlowner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -40. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -41. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -42. The Construction Landscape Plans shall indicate that all outdoor planter boxes will receive automatic irrigation. PL -43. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three -foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after - thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL -44. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long -term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL -45. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure, which will require inspection of irrigation installation of open trenches. The second inspection will verifythat all irrigation systems have head -to -head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicantlowner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -46. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. PL -47. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -48. Building Construction Plans shall illustrate an enhanced balcony railing at the rear elevation to match the balcony railing at the front elevation. PL -49. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -50. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PL -51. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45 -inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. PL -52. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. PL -53. The developer shall meet with the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) to verify irrigation tie in locations for the trees within the right -of -way. Irrigation for the new trees should be coordinated with the existing TCSD irrigation. PL -54. The landscape construction drawings for the street tree (ROW) landscaping and equipment relocation shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services. Developer shall be responsible for plan check costs and fees. PL -55. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to install the street tree (ROW) landscaping. PL -56. The developer shall comply with the Temecula Community Services District landscape inspection process. Developer shall be responsible for landscape inspection fees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -57. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his /her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL -58. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right -of -ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right -of -way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. PL -59. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL -60. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL -61. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off - street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696- 3000." PL -62. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. PL -63. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL -64. The street tree (ROW) landscaping shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services. PL -65. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL -66. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated August 3, 2010, a copy of which is attached. PL -67. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated September 10, 2010, a copy of which is attached. PL -68. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated August 9, 2010, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions /Information B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans. B -4. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. B -5. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. B -6. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. B -7. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights -of -way. B -8. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B -9. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B -10. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B -11. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one - quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. B -12. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03 -01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. B -13. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. B -14. Commercial projects shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal B -15. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. B -16. Provide a Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2010 edition of the California Building Code. B -17. Provide number and type of restroom fixtures, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Plumbing Code. B -18. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. B -19. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -20. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B -21. A pre- construction meeting is required with the building inspector priorto the start of the building construction. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F -1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. Current Title 24 codes will be applicable for this project. F -2. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on -site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official (CFC Chapter 5). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F -3. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all- weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -4. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F -5. The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on -site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14 and Chapter 5). F -6. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F -7. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F -8. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -9. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6- inch high letters and /or numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -10. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). F -11. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and /or signs (CFC Chapter 5). F -12. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. Applicant shall ensure any landscaping surrounding buildings is kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to prevent would -be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. PD -2. Applicant shall ensure any trees surrounding building rooftops be kept at a distance to prevent roof accessibility by "would -be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six -foot clearance from the buildings. PD -3. Any berms shall not exceed three feet in height. PD -4. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. PD -5. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with Riverside County Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655, low pressure sodium lighting preferred. PD -6. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. PD -7. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. PD -8. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. PD -9. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24- hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP. PD -10. Upon completion of construction, each building or business shall have an alarm system that is monitored bya designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi- tenant offices /suites /businesses located within a specific building shall each have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. PD -11. Any roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PD -12. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well - lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. PD -13. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. PD -14. Employee training regarding credit cards, theft, citizens' arrest procedures, personal safety, business security or any other related crime prevention subject is available free of charge through the Crime Prevention Unit. To schedule an appointment call (951) 506 -5132. PD -15. Any business that serves or sells any type of alcoholic beverage shall comply with all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all rules, regulations and guidelines of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. PD -16. Contact the Temecula Police Department for alcohol related inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes special events held at business locations where alcohol will be served for a fee and the event is open to the general public. PD -17. Applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. PD -18. Applicant will ensure all employees involved with the sales or service of alcohol and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages, are trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department provides free training for all employers and employees involved in service and sales of alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a training session for all new employees. Contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Office at (951) 506- 5132 to set up a training date. Training should be completed prior to the grand opening of this business and periodic updated training should be conducted when new employees /management are hired. PD -19. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: (a) valid California driver's license; (b) valid California identification card; (c) valid military identification card ( active /reserve /retired /dependent); (d) valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, and County or City agency. PD -20. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B &P), which includes the following requirements: (a) name of person; (b) date of birth; (c) physical description; (d) photograph; (e) currently valid (not expired). It is the responsibility of business owners and any person who sells or serves alcoholic beverages PD -21. The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost for inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of the business advising customers of the "Inkless Ink Program" in use. If the business becomes a victim of check fraud, the Police Department will be able to track the suspect with the thumbprint. PD -22. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi - public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two -way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. PD -23. The Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department offers free business security surveys, to schedule an appointment contact the unit at (951) 506- 5132. PD -24. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506 -5132. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed bythe developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on -site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City- maintained street right -of -way. PW -3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right -of -way. PW -4. All improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW -5. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls into the design of the project to prevent non - permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm drain system or receiving water during all field - related activities. PW -6. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be conceptually accepted bythe City prior to the initial grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered civil engineer and include Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management Practices, (BMPs), source controls, and treatment devices. PW -7. All onsite drainage and water quality features shall be privately maintained. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit PW -8. The developer shall submit a copy of a recorded reciprocal ingress /egress easement. PW -9. The developer shall submit a copy of the recorded private storm drain easement. PW -10. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must receive final acceptance by the City prior to issuance of any grading permit PW -11. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work within their right -of -way. PW -12. PW -13. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. PW -14. PW -15. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction. PW -16. PW -17. PW -18. PW -21. PW -22. PW -23. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations forthe construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. The developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. Construction -phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Planning Department, or other affected agencies. PW -19. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW -20. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. The developer shall obtain letters of approval for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. This project shall comply with Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit PW -24. Relocation of existing utilities affected by this project shall be completed. PW -25. PW -26. PW -27. PW -28. PW -29. PW -30. PW -32. PW -33. The developer shall construct all public improvements outlined in these conditions to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. a. Improve Old Town Front Street (Local Road Standards for Old Town - 60' RIW) to include installation of sidewalk, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). The developer shall construct all public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works including street improvements, which may include, but not limited to, pavement, sidewalk, sewer and domestic water systems; under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines; and storm drain facilities. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW -31. The project shall submit a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O &M) Agreement that must include the owner's notarized signature, proof of recordation with the County Recorder's Office, and all maintenance procedures for each of the structural treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the WQMP. The project shall demonstrate that all of the structural treatment control BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. PW -34. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -35. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -36. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. August 3, 2010 Sincerely, fl COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE • HEAL'. _ , SERVICES AGENCY DEPA RT M ENT OF ENVIRO HEA City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Attention: Planner Cheryl Kitzerow/ Matt Peters RE: Development Plan No. PA10 -0226 (Related Case PRO8 -0047) Dear Cheryl and Matt: Gregor Dellenbach, REHS (951) 955-8980 EHS100714 Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has reviewed the development plan for Chaparral 3, a 28, 190 square foot, mixed use, 3 story building with retail/ restauarent on the front floor and offices above at 28455 Old Town Front Street between Moreno Road and Sixth Street (APN 922 - 026 -033). The site plan does indicate an existing 8 inch sewer and an existing 12 inch water main in Old Town Front Street. We assume that these services are in and are available. 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE REQUIRED BY THE APPLICANT (Walt Allen Architect) TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT AND THE DEH FOOD PLAN CHECK STAFF: a) "Will- serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewer district. b) DEH food plan check will be required for any food facility and/ or vending operations. NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. Local Enforcement Agency • P0. Bur 1280. Riverside. CA 92502-1280 • i909 955-8982 • FAX 909: 781 -9653 • 4080 Lemon Street. 9th Floor. Riverside. CA 92501 Land Use and Water Engineering • PO. 3s 1296. Riverside CA 9 -1206 • 909; 955 -3940 • FAX (9091 955 -8903 • 4080 Lemon Sheet. 2nd Floor, Riverside. CA 92501 Board of Directors President Ronald W. Sullivan Vice President and Treasurer Joseph J. Kuebler, CPA Philip E. Paule Randy A. Record David 1. Slawson Board Secretary Rosemarie V. Howell General Manager Anthony J. Pack Director of the Metropolitan Water District of So. Calif. Randy A. Record Legal Counsel Redwine and Sherrill September 10, 2010 City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula Ca. 92589 -9033 Attn. Cheryl Kitzerow/ /Mat Peters EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT SINCE 1950 The City of Temecula has requested EMWD to review and comment on APN 922- 026 -033. There are sewer capacity issues in the Old Town Area. EMWD requires beginning dialogue with the applicant at or before the tentative phase of a project, in order to assess the infrastructure needs. Accordingly, we offer to meet with developers /engineers for one initial due - diligence meeting, without requiring a deposit. This meeting is to review your project and determine potential service from EMWD. The objective is to provide a forum to resolve any questions about our development process and help to determine if there are any potential issues that may exist in the area concerning EMWD facilities. No improvement plans will be accepted until this pre - project phase is completed and an EMWD Plan of Service has been approved. In order to set up a Due Diligence meeting we need: 1. A completed Due Diligence questionnaire. 2. Your proposed agenda for the due - diligence meeting 3. Location Map 4. Proposed development plan layout if available (hard copy and JPEG format) I encourage developers /engineers to become familiar with EMWD New Development processes, while designing your project. They have been developed over many years and serve a great importance as they can prevent complications and save time. More information can be found at http://www.emwd.org/new_biz/new-biz- dev.html If at any point in time there are questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Linda H. Petersen Development Coordinator ex. 4310 Peterselaemwd.orq cc: Walt Allen Architects Mailing Address: Post Office Box 8300 Perris, CA 92572 -8300 Telephone: (951) 928 -3777 Fax: (951) 928 -6177 Location: 2270 Trumble Road Perris, CA 92570 Internet : www emwd ore waterwater Board of Directors Lisa D. Herman President Lawrence M. Libeu Sr. Sire President Stephen J. Corona Ralph H. Daily Ben R. Drake John E. Hoagland William E. Plummer Officers Matthew G. Stone Genera! Manager Jeffrey D. Armstrong Chief Financial office rTreasurer X. Craig Elitharp, P};. Director of Operation; & Mau-., Dupe Perry R. Louck Dirromr of Planning Andrew L. Webster, P.E. Chief F]rg Kelli E. Garcia D, trsr <errm are C. Michael Cowen Best Best & Krieger LLP General Caunee' August 9, 2010 Cheryl Kitzerow Matt Peters City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY - CHAPARRAL 3; 28455 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET; (.59 ACRES M/L IN LOTS 12, 13, 14, AND 15, BLOCK 24 MB 015/726 SD TOWN OF TEMECULA); APN 922 - 026 -033 [WALT ALLEN ARCHITECTS] Dear Ms. Kitzerow and Mr. Peters: Please be advised that the above - referenced project/property is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). The subject project/property fronts an existing 12 -inch diameter PVC water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Old Town Front Street. Water service to the subject project/property exists under Account Nos. 0106292170, 0106287010, and 0106287002. Additions or modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Where private (on -site) facilities are required for water service, fire protection, irrigation, or other purposes, RCWD requires recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for such on -site private facilities, where private on -site water facilities may cross (or may be shared amongst) multiple lots /project units, and /or where, such `common' facilities may be owned and maintained by a Property Owners Association (proposed now or in the future). Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) destroying all on -site wells and signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing of the subject project /property development relative to water supply shortage contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances). Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589 -9017 • (951) 296.8900 • FAX (951) 296 -6860 Cheryl Kitzerow and Matt Peters /City of Temecula August 9, 2010 Page Two As soon as feasible, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project - specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project- specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office at (951) 296 -6900. Sincerely, RANCHO ,_ /, CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Peter Muserelli Engineering Project Coordinator cc: Corey Wallace, Engineering Manager Warren Back, Engineering Planning Manager Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Manager 10\PM:hab014 \F450 \FEG Rancho California Water District 42135 Wincheeler Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589-9017 • ■9511 296 -6900 • FAX 1 9511 296-6860 www.ranchowater.com Walter R. Allen architect + associates May 2, 2011 Statement of Justification Dear Staff & Commissioners, 4 23L65 Old lawn F +c3r,; J ie 201 Terneculo, CA 92590 p - (951) 693-0301 f - (95. i) 693. 4080 On behalf of the project owner and applicant, RCM Capital Partners, we would like to thank you for your review and consideration of this application for two variances for the proposed Chaparral 3 project. The Chaparral 3 project is located at 24855 Old Town Front Street, which is the north end of Old Town Temecula, adjacent to the northern Old Town arch. Surrounding uses include open space to the north, Murrieta Creek to the west, the existing Chaparral Center to the south, and Old Town Front Street to the east. (Figure1, vicinity map) Project Background: Walter R. Allen Architect & Associates began design analysis of the site in late 2005. The design was submitted to the City of Temecula Planning Department for a pre - application review in the summer of 2008, prior to the adoption of the current revised Old Town Specific Plan. The formal development plan application was submitted to the Planning Department in July 2010. The City adopted the revised Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) in May 2010. During its review of the project, Planning staff identified two design issues —both related to setbacks —that are not consistent with the development standards of the adopted OTSP: 1) the ground floor building setback from Old Town Front Street; and 2) the parking lot setbacks & landscaping at the rear of the proposed project (along the Murrieta Creek frontage). Because strict application of the OTSP would create practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships for the project, the applicant proposes two variances from the literal requirements of the OTSP: Variance One – Ground floor building setback from the primary street (Old Town Front Street) property line to be reduced from the required 10 foot setback (as designated by the arcade facade type) to a variable dimension (minimum 18" setback to maximum 4' -0" setback) along the northerly portion of the building where the design designates the "shop front" facade. (Figure 2, Setbacks & Figure 5, Site Plan Diagram) Variance Two – Parking lot setback & planting requirements to be reduced from the required 20 feet behind the "build -to line," (40 feet behind the property line) on the Murrieta Creek Frontage, to 0 feet setback from the property line and 3' planting islands to be reduced to zero feet respectively. (Figure 6, Parking Placement & Figure 5, Site Plan Diagram) 2011 Necessary Findings: Under the City's Development Code (Section 17.04.040), an application for a variance may be approved, or conditionally approved, if all of the following findings are made: 1. That there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by the strict application of the code due to the physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that are not shared by other properties in the zone. 2. The circumstances and the characteristics for the variance were not created by the applicant. 3. The variance does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. 4. The variance places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties. 5. The variance does not permit uses which are not otherwise permitted in the zone. Because of special circumstances applicable to the property, all of these findings can be made for each of the two proposed variances. These findings are discussed more fully below. Variance One — Front Street Setback Discussion & Findings Required Condition: Within the Downtown Core Zone, the OTSP requires that buildings designate particular permitted "facade types" for each building. The proposed Chaparral 3 building has been designed with two facade types. The first facade type — "gallery frontage " —is proposed for the southerly portion of the building along Old Town Front Street. The gallery frontage facade is consistent with the OTSP. The second facade type — "shop -front frontage " —is proposed for the northerly portion of the building. The shop -front facade requires a 10' building setback from the primary street property line. This results in a flat building facade, the full height of the building, 10' behind the property line. (Figure 3, facade types) Proposed Condition: Due to the unusual configuration of the lot on which the project is located, use of the shop - front facade requires a variable setback. The right -of -way for Old Town Front Street along the front of the lot is not a straight line. Rather, it jogs into the site approximately 12 feet right where the change in the facade type occurs. This irregularity in the shape of the lot expands the Old Town standard of 10 feet for a public sidewalk to 22 feet. To accommodate this jog in the right-of-way, the proposed Chaparral 3 design places the ground -floor building facade as close as possible to the property line. This is necessary to create a consistent and flat building facade where the "build -to line" would be located. (Figure 2, setbacks & Figure 4, ROW) This reduced setback is consistent with the location of the build -to line for all other properties in the Downtown Core Zone with street frontage. The building's shop -front facade is located 22 feet from the face of the curb, typical of all other properties in the same zone. A strict interpretation of the OTSP would require the Chaparral 3 building to be setback a full 32 feet from the typical Front Street face of the curb (22 feet from the street to the property line plus 10 feet from the property line to the build -to line). In fact, in this case, the required setback from the face of the curb would measure 40 feet because of the constriction of Old Town Front Street near the northern Old Town arch. A 32 -foot setback would be substantially greater than any other business in the Downtown Core Zone. This increased setback also is inconsistent with the guiding principles of the "build -to line" concept outlined in the OTSP (See Section IV -H, Circulation & Streetscape Standards.) A 32- foot setback would make visibility difficult for retail tenants on the ground floor and threaten the commercial viability of the project. This reduced visibility is made worse by the location of the Old Town arch at the front of the property. The arch sits directly in front of the building, right where the shop -front facade is designated. (Figure 4, ROW) The variance request affects only the ground floor retail suites. The upper floors remain with the reduced setback because the OTSP's arcade frontage development standards allow a zero setback for the upper floors. Findings: 1. There are practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships created by the strict application of the code due to the physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that are not shared by other properties in the zone. The property configuration along Old Town Front Street has a variable right -of -way. This is the only property in the Downtown Core Zone with such a variable frontage. Strict application of the OTSP would therefore create practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships. The increased setback from the street caused by the 12 -foot jog in the property line, and the obstruction of the northern Old Town arch, would significantly reduce visibility of the building. This situation is compounded by the fact that this parcel is located at the end of Old Town and so is not adjacent to other retail to the north or pedestrian access from the south. These property characteristics are not addressed by the OTSP. Strict application of the OTSP setback requirements would mean that this parcel would be the only parcel required to have an additional 12 -foot setback from the typical build -to line along Old Town Front Street. 2. The circumstances and characteristics were not created by the applicant. The irregular lot configuration resulted from two separate actions beyond the applicant's control. The first was an eminent domain action initiated by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC &WCD). As partial compensation for property taken by RCFC &WCD to complete the Murrieta Creek improvements, a new parcel was created north of the traditional boundaries of the Downtown Core Zone and transferred to the applicant. This is the parcel on which the Chaparral 3 project is proposed. The parcel is fronted by two different right -of -way standards. The revised OTSP standards do not account for properties within the Downtown Core Zone that have variable right -of -way, or property lines greater than 10 feet from the face of the curb. 3. The granting of the variance does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. The granting of the variance would not grant special privileges to the applicant, but rather would allow the applicant to develop its site consistent with all other properties within the Downtown Core Zone with frontage along Old Town Front Street. The variance will simply promote greater retail visibility and thus will not adversely impact the welfare and safety of property or persons in the surrounding area. 4. The variance places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties. Because the variance will not adversely impact the surrounding properties, suitable conditions are not necessary to maintain the quality of life and public health, safety and general welfare of the surrounding properties. 5. The variance does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone. The variance is for a proposed office /retail mixed use building located in the Downtown Core Zone of the OTSP (SP -5) and is consistent with the current allowable land uses in this zoning district. Variance Two — Parking Placement Setback Discussion & Findings On a site with creek frontage within the Downtown Core Zone, the OTSP requires that parking facilities be set back from the creek frontage property line a minimum of 40 feet (70 feet is recommended). (See OTSP Section IV.D.4.iii.) A 20 -foot setback is required for all structures facing the creek (called the "build -to line "), and a 20 -foot setback from that build -to line (50 feet recommended) is required for all parking facilities. (Figure 6, parking placement) Additionally on page IV -29, Section IV.D.4.x the specific plan requires 3' landscape planters around all at grade parking. Because of special circumstances unique to its parcel, the Chaparral 3 project cannot meet the setback requirement for parking. The Chaparral 3 parking design proposes a 0 -foot setback from the creek frontage property line and no perimeter planting. The site currently has two parking areas. The first is accessed from Old Town Front Street and is proposed to be replaced by the new Chaparral 3 building, so that parking will be lost. The second is along the rear of the property fronting the creek. This parking area's current configuration has a 0 -foot setback. This resulted from the RCFC &WCD eminent domain action, which adjusted the lot line of the Chaparral Center to align with the face of the existing curb. Access to this parking area is from the south by way of a common driveway /parking lot shared by two existing structures: the Chaparral Center and the Chaparral North building. The parking area connects with the terminus of 6 Street to the south. The Chaparral 3 project proposes to leave this rear parking area intact, with some modification, at its current elevation, and to extend the parking area to the north. The resulting design provides 10 parking spaces where as the existing parking areas provided 15 spaces. (Figure 7, site aerial) The existing shared access driveway is to continue to be used as the only vehicle access point. The OTSP places several constraints on parking lot access. Since the project site is not served by an alley or a side street, and access from Old Town Front Street is discouraged, the existing access point is the only feasible alternative. As the existing driveway curb is the creek frontage property line the requirement for three foot landscape planters at the perimeter of the parking area is not feasible without demolishing and realigning the existing rear access driveway, forcing a reduction in area of the ground floor. Therefore no planting is proposed at the rear property line adjacent to the existing driveway. Additionally the Murrieta Creek Multi -Use Trail proposes a landscape buffer along the full length of the rear property line which will provide the landscape buffering required by the OTSP. Findings: 1. There are practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships created by the strict application of code due to the physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that are not shared by other properties in the zone. The development standards in the OTSP specify parking lot placement based upon two typical lot configurations. (See OTSP, Figures IV -4 & IV -5.) Neither of these two lot configurations is consistent with the project site. Yet Staff has indicated the standard applicable to the project is the one shown in Figure IV -5. The parking placement configuration shown in Figure IV -5 is inconsistent with the actual configuration of the Chaparral 3 lot. The standard designates a property with creek frontage on a side yard, fronting a side street, and backing up to an alley. This is not the case with the applicant's parcel. The Chaparral 3 parcel fronts Old Town Front Street and backs up to the creek. There is neither side street frontage nor alley access. This parcel and the two developed parcels immediately to its south are the only parcels between the Arches in Old Town Temecula that share this particular configuration. The application of the allowable parking placement specified in Figure IV -5 effectively prohibits any parking on the site. It is not possible to provide parking on the site consistent with the standards of the OTSP because of its limited size and the existing access points. Further, the OTSP discourages any new vehicle access points in the location existing access is available. This situation creates an unnecessary hardship for a proposed retail /office use, particularly since the existing parking on the site will be lost by the construction of the Chaparral 3 building. 2. The circumstances and characteristics were not created by the applicant. The configuration of the Chaparral 3 lot is the result of two separate actions beyond the control of the applicant. The first was the eminent domain action by RCFC &WCD. In this proceeding, RCFC &WCD adjusted the property line to align with the curb of the existing parking area, and this parking area was allowed to remain. This resulted in a smaller site at the creek frontage. The site is bounded by the existing Chaparral Center structures, which were constructed under a different set of development standards than those outlined in the updated OTSP. Access to the site is consistent with the prior OTSP. In addition, the existing parking area at the rear of the Chaparral Center was improved under the prior OTSP. At the time, the applicant could not possibly have known this configuration might restrict its ability to construct additional parking and landscaping to the north under the standards of the future OTSP. 3.. The granting of the variance does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. The granting of the variance would allow the property owner to leave intact and expand an existing parking facility to make up the loss of other on -site spaces. The surrounding site constraints are unique to this site. The existing development to the south sets the precedent for site access and the configuration of the elements that bound the site are not consistent with any one development standard within the new OTSP. The variance will not have a negative impact on the welfare and safety of property or persons in the surrounding area. Rather, the additional parking provided on the site will alleviate the public's demand for the already limited on -street and public parking in the vicinity. In fact, without the variance to allow on -site parking, the addition of 4,000 sf of retail and 10,000 sf of office will have substantial negative impacts to the surrounding businesses and property owners as tenants and customers of the Chaparral Center North and Chaparral 3 building will look for parking elsewhere. 4. The variance places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties. Because the variance will not adversely impact the surrounding properties, suitable conditions are not necessary to maintain the quality of life and public health, safety and general welfare of the surrounding properties. However, the applicant would be amenable to conditions that require recordation of a reciprocal access easement for the existing and proposed parking areas. 5. The variance does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone. The variance is for a proposed office /retail mixed use building located in the Downtown Core Zone of the OTSP (SP -5) and is consistent with the current allowable land uses in this zoning district. Figure 1 — Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Setbacks OTSP Building Placement Criteria: Figure IV -2 Primary Street Frontage Figure IV -3 Side Street /Creek Frontage Exiting Lot Configuration: 8 7 ( 2 0 E6 1 :* L Oft N. *PACK Curb Curb Alley (where occurs) (g Alley (where occurs) 13 ,- Line -- Build - "1'u Line Side Street Side Street tumkiGy •TmE.E-r r Property Build -To Line cutzs I}-- i ciede ct Logs " i 1 ICIL)RielETA CRFEK WA-K C&4MURGAt_ I3E0Et.df j. , wr (0 rv-tn'. pwuEloAY Figure 3 — Facade Types Gallery Facade Shopfront Facade Arcade Facade Private Property R.O.W. .d1 10' I0' `� Privat �� — T - R.O.W. O. C^... 0 c . 10' l& Private Property - - 4 R.O.W. Figure 4 — ROW Configuration at Shopfront Facade 0 1 APc Figure 5 — Site Plan with Build -to -Line Diagram -- — REQUIRED 10' SETBACK (BUILD -TO -LINE) Q T / _ 1 �) • i �-.`` a y �l ' "� FRONT STREET °-- - 7 � TYI/RONTREET RIGHT -- _� F -WAY PROPERTY LINE �J `` -' f I r.� t PROPOSED BUILDING FOOT PRINT O 40' SETBACK (PARKING) CREEK PROPERTY LINE I I PROPOSEp PARKING ' SETBACK BUILD -TO -LINE) I to Figure 6 — OTSP Parking Placement Figure TV -5 Curb ^-- Alley (where occurs) 12 T Side Street t Property Line_ Build -To Line i Figure 7 — Existing Site Parking 13 Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below PA10 -0226 and PA11 -0053 Chris Campbell, Walt Allen Architects on behalf of RCM Capital Partners LLC Planning Application Nos. PA10 -0226 and PA11 -0053, a Development Plan for Chaparral 3, a proposed 23,137 square foot, mixed use, three -story building with retail /restaurant uses on the first floor and mezzanine, and offices above, and a Variance request to reduce the setback at northeast property corner, as well as the parking setback and landscape requirement along the western property line, located at 28455 Old Town Front Street. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Determination will be filed in compliance with CEQA Section 15162, Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations Cheryl Kitzerow, (951) 694 -6409 City of Temecula, Council Chambers July 20, 2011 6:00 p.m. C:1Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007680.doc Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. ITEMS 6 -13 STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: July 20, 2011 PREPARED BY: Matthew D. Peters, AICP, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application Numbers: SUMMARY: PA11 -0109, a Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -13) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Rancho Vista Road, approximately 202' southwest of the centerline of Camino Romo PA11 -0112, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -18) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the northwest side of Southern Cross Road, across from Sky Terrace Drive PA11 -0114, a Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -20) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Moraga Road, approximately 310' south of Rancho California Road PA11 -0118, a Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -26) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the southeast side of La Serena Way, approximately 195' southeast of Calle Pina Colada PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -28) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Leena Way, directly across from Lucca Way PA11 -0121, a Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -32) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Nicolas Road, approximately 620' east of Winchester Road PA11 -0124, a Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -37) in the 1 RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road approximately 185' west of the centerline of Ynez Road PA11 -0125, a Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -38) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Zevo Drive, approximately 125' west of Diaz Road CEQA: Notice of Determination (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS ") to provide wireless telecommunication services. The proposed DAS network is a low profile system capable of delivering wireless telecommunications service to customers of multiple carriers such as AT &T, Verizon, Sprint, and MetroPCS. The proposed network initially will supply the infrastructure for NewPath's anchor tenant, MetroPCS. The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called, "nodes," which receive an optical signal from a central hub and distribute the signal in the form of Radio Frequency (RF) transmissions. For this Project, three other nodes are located outside the City boundary (one in the County of Riverside and two in the City of Murrieta). Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of -way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. Each node consists either of antenna arrays constructed within or on a slim -line monopole designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right -of -way, or antenna arrays fixed to existing utility poles owned by the Joint Pole Committee ( "JPC "). Each facility generally features a 53.74 -inch Kathrein Tri- sector antenna within a flush- mounted housing (for new poles) or three Kathrein antennas mounted to existing JPC utility poles. Either configuration also will feature one or more Flex Wave Prisms or similar "fiber repeaters" mounted to either the new street light or the existing JPC utility pole. The fiber repeater converts digitalized spectrum received from the hub into RF signals emitted from the antenna array. The Project involves the installation of both aerial fiber -optic cable on existing wood utility poles and newly installed street lights, and underground fiber -optic cable installed within newly installed and existing poly vinyl chloride (PVC) conduit in previously disturbed rights -of -way. The newly installed fiber -optic cable would connect 39 distributed antenna system nodes and ancillary optical conversion and power equipment also attached to the same utility poles within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way. The entire network will be connected to a newly installed fiber -optic base station hub. Construction of the proposed DAS Project will consist specifically of the following: 2 • Installation by NewPath of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed as street lights; • Installation of 39 DAS nodes each containing either: one (1) tri- sector pipe antenna, three (3) antennae inside radomes, or between three (3) and six (6) panel antennas installed on the utility pole; • Installation of fiber -optic equipment (i.e. optical conversion equipment, signal regeneration equipment, switching equipment, etc.) mounted on existing wood and newly - installed street lights; • Installation of four -inch Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) conduit; • Aerial installation of fiber -optic cable onto existing or new wood and street lights; • Underground installation of fiber -optic cable into existing and newly installed conduit; • Underground connection of network to one (1) hub facility to be installed inside an existing public storage facility located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Rd.; • Installation of pull boxes and hand holes; and • Splicing of fiber -optic cable into facilities. The location of the proposed Project is illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan. Engineering drawings for a new street light and co- location on an existing utility are also attached. Construction is expected to last approximately 120 days and will consist of two (2) aerial crews and two (2) underground crews working simultaneously to complete construction of the proposed Project. ANALYSIS Given the large size of the overall project, City staff has worked with NewPath /Crown Castle to break the project down into manageable batches of approximately four to eleven Planning Applications for each hearing. This first batch was approved on March 16, 2011 and included the following seven nodes: TM -01; TM -02; TM -03; TM -05; TM -17; TM -39; and TM -41. Each node in the first batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. The second batch was approved on May 4, 2011 and included the following five nodes: TM -15, TM -21, TM -27, TM -30, and TM -42. Nodes TM -15, TM -27 and TM -30 will include three antennas attached to existing wood utility poles, while the remaining two nodes will be designed as concrete street light poles similar to those approved in batch 1. The third batch was approved on May 18, 2011 and included the following three nodes: TM -9, TM -11, and TM -14. Node TM -18 was continued for redesign due to neighborhood concerns. Of these nodes, three are designed as concrete street light poles similar to those previously approved, and one (TM -14) will be attached to an existing wood utility pole. The fourth batch was approved on June 1, 2011 and included the following six nodes: TM -22, TM -23, TM -24, TM -31, TM -33, and TM -36. Each node in the fourth batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. 3 The fifth batch was approved on July 6, 2011 and included the following 11 nodes: TM -25, TM- 29, TM -04, TM -06, TM -07, TM -08, TM -10, TM -12, TM -13, TM -16, and TM -19. Each node in the fifth batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. Node TM -13 was continued at the July 6, 2011 Planning Commission hearing to the July 20, 2011 hearing. A neighbor testified that he pulled a building permit for a pool house, which would be within the 75' setback from an antenna to a residence. However, staff found that the permit was for a gunite pool and spa. No plans have been submitted or permits pulled for a pool house. The sixth batch includes the following six nodes (plus two continued from previous meetings): TM -20, TM -26, TM -28, TM -32, TM -37, and TM -38. Each node in the sixth batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. Node TM -13 is discussed above. Node TM -18 was continued at the May 18, 2011 Planning Commission hearing to the July 20, 2011 hearing. However, the applicant has requested that TM -18 be continued off calendar to allow time to review an alternative involving locating on an existing wood utility pole. The applicant has filed a Letter of Intent with the Joint Pole Association (JPA) to utilize or replace an existing wood pole, but members of the JPA have 30 days to respond. Because the JPA has not yet responded, this node will be re- noticed and brought back to the Planning Commission when a final location has been determined. The street lights will have the same finish and light arm attachment as a standard Southern California Edison street light. The only minor differences between the poles besides the antenna rays will be a slightly larger outside diameter (eight inches for standard SCE light pole versus ten inches for NewPath /Crown Castle), and a taller overall height (32 feet versus approximately 40 feet high). It should be noted that the top of the luminaire or light fixture will be 32 feet for consistency along the street right -of -way. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on July 7, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on March 16, 2011 and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. 4 The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. The antennas have been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in record as a whole before the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS NewPath /Crown Castle DAS Master Plan Map Aerial and Vicinity Maps (PA11 -0109, 0114, 0118, 0119, 0121, 0124, and 0125) Plan Reductions (PA11 -0109, 0114, 0118, 0119, 0121, 0124, and 0125) Resolution (PA11 -0109) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution (PA11 -0114) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution (PA11 -0118) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 5 Conditional before the view of the Resolution (PA11 -0119) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution (PA11 -0121) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution (PA11 -0124) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution (PA11 -0125) Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring Program Public Correspondence Notices of Public Hearing (PA11 -0114, 0118, 0119, 0121, 0124, and 0125) (ID NORTH CITY OF TEMECULA TY » CI;C)W,W N (,A';TLE LDS MASTER PLAN MCROW v f: IV: 4SIr)1_ CUIIMV tae v '• TE LEGEND CABLE PLACEMENT (Awox. rooiap.) Mel w[ nAa1101T 1411111.11•1 MOH 1011i. NOP& nAe —- 0 NODE L©< rio$S TI O PA11 -0109 City of Temecula c 11" AO 250 530 Fee; Aerial - March 2010 PA l 1 -0109 This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the Information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. Thls map is not for reprint or resale. City of Temecula 0 250 Aerial - March 2010 500 Feet PA11 -0112 This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. City of Temecula 0 250 500 Foci. Aerial - March 2010 PAl 1 -0114 This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. The map Is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibihtyfor the information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. This map Is not (or reprint or resale. 0 50 100 200 1 1=111•111 Fee l' PA11 -0118 City of Temecula 0 50 10C 200 Aerial - March 2010 3C0 Feet PA11 -0118 This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Data and Information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. City of Temecula 0 50 100 200 Feet Aerial - March 2010 PA1 1 -0119 I his map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. The map Is denved from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessoes Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map, Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. This map Is not for repdnt or resale. City of Temecula 0 253 Aerial - March 2010 500 Peet PA11 -0121 This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on This map. Data and information represented on This map are subject to update and modfiealion. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be Queried for the most current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. City of Temecula 0 50 100 200 Feet Aerial - March 2010 PA 11 -0124 This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic information System. The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Data and Information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. City of Temecula 0 10) Fe et Aerial- March 2010 PA11 -o12; 71Umai)A 111NI2b•r {R otTeme CIO Geogl4)ilo tuffs }:4m Tie map K ae rt:ed nun lute data /ucu Cetl b tie PN2 II2 {Jut . SdO1't Or pa roue It Md ti e Tral dr Kitt I aid Laid tla a p me It Age tc; oT Pbe G l.:k :U I I t• . TI e : It( otT2 Nee •• to aid Ilu e o 17 W310 It; 01 k!LII IeSpol d b 11ty T?I tie 11 /M WSWICIIe dolt11N17 ).Dataaid tin atblPpre.seitde tit map a12s1 I:ieett q1 tat aid mall'tab:s.Tie Ge.Jmph P.: 10;1111.30A sr :tem nd 4 +I Sot 1c *. SY01 IIIVgseiIdT.I1e (HMO lPIt tin atb1. Tl K N1 i) t loth! P 'Mao 1 P sal? . CROWN CA3ILL TM -13 NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE EAST SIDE OF RANCHO VISTA RD. �51 202' SOUTH OF CENTERLINE OF CAMINO ROMO TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPLICANT COS. 4506 91I49.0404 1140 00114 - 9615 290 5[004 9. 4109 091S.C1. 91(3704 0960(0 6770E (505) 333.0103 JURISDICTION 1310 Of (10090 11100 eat St 311(0004 CA 5250 0000 (951) 900.9190 (A( (951) 615 - 403 ENGINEERING FIRM/SURVEYING 0•29 111074. 0004 M► an 940 70■040 WOE 100 0940. 4 92 Ma/CI Erie 11000 0064 1406E 49 43343 1941 909- 991' -5113 COORDINATES M 1194X6 I0N0 - 1.0151 CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS 515 IR 1 7744 (603) 1.3.0,6 97 0091101 Mane 0010050 7944- (20M 930.014 5114 A 1440 904 (9191 1.14-71,10 10007! coa06te41 . J e" 101110 (6051 491 -113t 575101 1040446 mCfon 7701E (1 CODE COMPLIANCE: 794. 000/ NO 010045 999. 57 9010900 5 94000 4 4LU9074C0 16M 114 0A4O1r MOOS 0t 106 70011500 (00(1 03 600010 01 144 000/0660 .4600175 90 (0494/47l9 /00419 0007600 (. 0206 5410!* 500 Mt COX. 0 0914000/0 7411900 000. 93. 900 M • 065 • PROJECT DESCRIPTION I ,,10(1 C01S070 (1' . X94 (04 11 W-. 191100 4(C 910940.0 740 90/0 Veen FACT'?., '040 0 43.1 601 /.E n 3.IIR 9M 10,2351 IM'. 04.4914 400 an SMC .LSSOCw)10 Ca 405. 00 m F131(0 8 30' 1) 3O 030(1[ 31.7 10,1 70i/ 90.1 1. 11' 0.3 1949 0. 05 a 3) 206 0. IO 0. . 33 9 4 69441 99410 0 4 11,5• ) 3011 13'5 ((6(006 0009 5 1) 59 r • 0000/4 009 • 1) 2141 MR S0K6 LTI9I DATA TABLE .Came! KVC0 600et! SMC71 7001499 I(A0. ece 2IOI a rMINIM tame 0000049 C404 IOM 010490 151100 wo 149'0409010(90 1 IYS 1 004 /AM 44 ee16n ANA 1014 9*0160 0W. (01 00•0.1 1100! 4A 4010 900.0491. 09100(909 nyf 91 400.410. OAP. 44 /VII 9�w0013 AWN ALMA 5/1 0414 0 • 0117044 511.5090 40 14 *960274 11MC101( e07-44 / (017407X1 name 1.04 !96194011 5.0001 SAKI Ti 1,114 P1 Al A2 A3 (044(1 0094.400. 1900 90)004091 500000/0 9e M0M9 11( 7761 1504X040 (0•00 ROM loM a*. IA91. 7*05000NO*At' 1000 WORM O 444.. ADA) 466 940 9X60 OF 1(0. 5/9 we MOO 0 99. w+ IV9 •/9 946 04/0 I(q 04/4 (l 091* 1.401 .4.I MI SHEET INDEX 00094114/ VICINITY MAP ATM -13 CO SRHE7 LIFO P01/ CO V)0431) 00 142829 DATE 1 /13/11 1/13/11 5/26/11 DESCRIPTION 06SP 20 0941 SP 040110001 601 419 X0094101 108 4RRENI 604.6 DAIS .5AAS PREPARED 6! 6: Maximize Comm. •� Group, Inc. 1351 7040944 ROAD Su1E 100 CORONA. G 92852 OFFICE: (909) 786 -2170 SAX: ((009)) 992 -3113 ' J CIIENI. ' ., CROWN 1100 OEXTER AYE 5011E 250 VAiIlE, WA 96109 / ..0.ero9n001Ut tom /.,F 0;;) TM -13 Sit/ NAME R ADDRESS: TENECLIA NOON NODE 13 !' 03 D am= m, 6E flmit count ammo 1E.ECe1A CA 92092 •1EET 04110 1111..E: 4-EE' `+.(NN 131 ECKEC 6'Y: IC SC .? L1 140110 ER T1 4011.06 CAERE SCHEDULE 100 11(1(0 .a► 11044 M / 1404 011 { hi 006 10 400(( QM a 054117 15.1. 1 '/1 (R 0 01 10045 43 -0' > ' /0' .a KU 1K 00101:0 0 040 10525 u,0' 1 1/1 0 r 0' 070107 NO 10101 00 l a ■/: awe a No, Wry 441a•M O 0004.0M.w0.0swMIA AN0INl40 CABLE 9CNEOULf ARAD Ytp ,0401 404. M / M0 004 I 0*1 003 a SA. OE 1ia47�i. a 0nf0lN 000 014 15.1. 1 '/1 (R 140 pp 0 �a 43 -0' > 1 /4' 10.0 040 i1 - 0000. 010 1020 11'4 2 4h Soh .0 swam 40.. • •• 010•• • Or LEGEND Q 1.444 0100 *MOM 0410 1-> 01000 Pa IVA • It] 1A O 04046 000 600 00141 ON 00000 60 4011 000 710 1010000/1/ - - - 4011301 - - - - 70134011* 1W8 u0[ - 1400 •6w - - - - ohm MOM. - -- 1- 469400 004 -t -__ 10100011 La�01J - 0'-- -• n4011100 0001 - 410 - 0000 430 - *i01C101S 1105(041(14 -0- 000 (0111000 C73iR.W00L:OJtll1 � CC 10 141.13070004 400(1 wl 71174. 1000 514111, 00 001'000 e4 •O .4104 900 R n .1001E 0. 010 0(10.4. MAN 0'40 . VOL MMOA 0004 41 017 470001 110 004000 : 00 45 04 0000 I%0 * 0403100 N 0065 011.000 0 01 y I* I l0 1060. 03000 a 0106 5 0100 00* 11014.3 X 1.415141 1 01,14 04101 .4400 0111 01( At >I ■ (4.1 1 02.124 ,00 04 � na9M1 ( 14 007. 0.4 n ,37 MC 043001 1 0001 001001 * 4• u 1* 0 1 43. 00. 4'44.4 C0: 1 400 .0 MX 10 •/-1' NAM taae. 4 CO 00.030 5000105 Wit O /•N 100430 t4). 5 00 (00.0 000 0' 001 0)00 A. 00000 T0. 1/• 901 *001' >400011201iA624122. 1 /67704 X' 10••01 COLA 10 CMON 5x(1 %V W 1000 r Wet 00001 M 6' COMO 04 .0400 soh MOM b 12 10. 00 MhU> 00 I4 ( *OL110010 400060, 0O001 100 500.000 Al 11.630400 0701004 W K AVOW 40127051* PaC 0110; :001/00% 4 4 4 00! 1 5101 if hog 000 )03 450 * 1 4 1 40010/ •000 M 0 1600 10 000 11 K 04 0000 101 50 9 40 001 1420 04010 004141 0 a *010 1*0 000 001. :401 000 41 . 04 00 N 501011 5030100 0 ARP 0 Rhea 0 AC O0Y(0 M WO N' 0 00 0.000 VIM 010 0000 00 • KLO001019at, 11 0001• MO Wm 00103 *n 11 • 01.100 1 'OAC 190 0 10 001010 MAC •00. W V OEM 1004104010(4000400040* \ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES 1001. 1 4 (0000041( Il„044 * 1101111 M001103?$ 0*03*4, 000440/41 Mt 140* 0.00OD 0 •171•• L W 000101140 4.11 WM.41010 0Lb1 1111*4 4 1.1 P COMM RIMW* 1h 10 x01 (01010 10.41 10 400:00 100 • 01111 0 4013 0 0 10410010 0030 0000 4 01010 0104 w 0000 0 817400. 33041.110 •Mil 47110 • K 14(0900 110 SAMS 0 ) 0.3.0 1071.17.*01011 1004000701 RIAl 4 R 4* 011410149*• LAO 040.14. 0 Mac 00 5.A MI 04 a •4100 80* 04 0100/0 *MI A81. 0.X IIO 1.10 01JO. 016 4011 BOOT 0) 00 ( COMM 010 ID *410101* M 0 101 141.L (414340 a V. OA= 1A41 . 3 9APEIS RN 010 KIP 1M410 0010, PAM K MA0 0 411.0 1 WWI 111 N AMA Pt 001 IL 0 4 OMR O WORM 1.. MAX 0444 0*0O>00001 OTC . 00.00034 0* 1800001040 1 4fa MS100• UAW OM OW 1 0000/1110 0001 . Uhl 001 0* RK K 0101 M INS. AMU 110000 W 0041 01000!1 *•144(11 MOM.) 4 000 OR R 0 oh .52 MOON a 0 01.01 M9 0 M 0004004 000 oho 000 a' 4( 0(1400001 0x01* 01014 040 0.171430071 10 K /0> 00 O4. ohs 00 0 10.00000 0 .0 N 0 040000 0110 M' 0 .K� 10010`0 R9r0° * K Or O 1 400n MG. SOO RN11 00 4040 100 0 4 w• 070117 •1 444 0 00oh031 POW M*0* * 00 v.0. 00 1 11*( .w 71 • w*wb .11. »00.(0 011 -0 40U310. RLK 110 I0 •6a Pw 710 10 00001 maxclal 0 > GI 604'0( 4.04 •M04 W 0 000 1141 000 11 K 0100 (0 <MWC; 1.004 1104800 lot ♦a. 104- ha 11/0II Y. w yr 0)0.0 memo. R40amIwt 0 O0 •. r 1.}044 1.000 fa a f aw ha 1004 * 011[1 M 10 04 * •aa 7000 K .011 w 0 •• a 30 1 1 01 - 1. 01000 y aL00050107 w 01 M.1 0.r w0w416t0..t0 40.00 OL 004 a Yw 0 M 01 000.0 011 0 4610 ma 034 00 cool 000(0 Mo surrc 0( MOM 4,i 4 410 0 00.001 * , Or * * OAS 900010 0i (404 040000 01 110 00. Of MMM(1VaWMYLNTT !0001 t 404011 066E O m 1a 0!0104 01 MVO • 04040 61.0,04. 4000 0010. 400(0 Of .01040: al 4C* 7.0•01 40101000 007 000100'1.510 44. 01) 4■0( 11004 N4 N 00' 0000000 4,400 0 140 0044 MO *4004 (10110 00 040001 I'1 08410 tl 142 RM1(0. /1004 NI 1•1 045 00011 OR 000100000 <MO. • ■984( 10. K .010.[101 a.. • 4700•( (8 100031 0 M 00400* 004 0. 4411 0000100 040 0 4 04300 to 0!100 000 A 0 Ma 0�t Ro um ma 0 ws r 0. KN01* 00 140010 700014 004 *0 MOO M =MA. 01 0 P00 A0 w.( 101)4 *0 04001!• AM 00400440 n0av0 00 *W 0140 /J( .070100 4 30104 01100,•010 M R)((0011/000M1:*t 11 a 00.4 044 0.900 0 Of RC 40100100 0 1010) 04. 110040 0.040 00 10 114 0101 C.O. 101040001 • NOJw, w RAIL( 001.0 Wow.) 0 MI (w:1 410 009 1406 Mar hare 100 0�w000000 I0 0 00 0 (O' 00. 4,0 oh 00 4,+n 110010,00 (014(6 (00100 Mf. 40 • KS.. 0 0 1.01 010041(( 100 R 00400 0 1014 000 000 411 1001 40 110 60 00.10 7 14 *110 014A 100 11 14 4 100E ).4 1100(4)1 00000( 1,444 P 0498 41 54004 +0 0040 wail A 10001E17113 GENERAL NOTES 04.00440253420.1120141001111 n.Tal l i(a ° e%iri (7,01 41 °NY 7.77 1105 too 1000 41..00 00009 5 001 0 01 0 POOL t>' 040 AU% OFT 111( 77. 1 000 004 000 AMT. 441 W CAWS 041 0 Or Al a 01 <M� 0 001100 W w4 (0 6 VA 011 Nan 0 L(pA •84 0 ANN. 004 C40431 005 0 1010 0 40 7411 Cr .006 7. 000 O 0434120* 1 00.1 (000000 0 04000* . 0* 0)0 Ax 431( 0 40010 4420 010 14 PISS 11 1001 000010 000 /104 AI Q 37, 0 7140011 1008 0108400 1 11!( 0000 0,0 11 I OO ° PAC MI MO 40001 7 DAMS 4°0 K al. 09001 . Mar 4 C0RLA *110 0411 CM/0A NOM 7620 00 MOM O4 R *40010014 M K MO 010 1 00 0000000008 34001 00001114 R 1104 01. 5041 I 0400100 OM 4 0040 4' >611106 MOVE 0410 0 101 0190 000 W04 *MK 0 00 1400 (s 41) / 103 v / r.7 v4 442 mew 140 •O 7011 ors 10 040 40790* 0011 -. 0 000010 00¢1 01 10110 104 3010.111 04>449.060* On Cahn 070K00*40110 Ns ha 00100 10 100 0 At 3816.110440 M 0000L/RMfWOr0003440000* 0000 • 000,4 0430 (04010100040. K 0011000040161°41 A MO WW1 00 KU OM 0011 •v WA0°° pYO .111 * • 00 s00 004111 VOWS MN 04 40 4 A.%.4. 44(00 a 0* w 00 t Mn 0 1000 10*00410106 *O0. Of MICR 0000.11 K 000410101,0 1107 WRY OM 1 0100 034010• 1*00 0014010 M 1 WO 110684 *100000 *4443 400 ( 0* 1111 W M 0 K 100.1 0100. . 00111 00 K 9700 900106 10 0610 ON 064010 N 10013 0 K PO 0060 0106 * •MID 11 400* 006 0040.0* N 1000 601</00111 Sat00 COO 10(/136500 0104000041000 • ATOM • •1111 MAIM 0140 mammas 0 001650 0 00 UK 401 O 06061000 /u 04 000 0* 10 00400 10044 0 0*0* 000 0 ME hart K 1004100• 000011120• 0 10400010 a N4090* 01410 w K 011(11010011 MA * 000 0 04 46 0 0 4 14 00 i wI M I K CO °R r1 , 1000 P 508 044106(C. 77.1(0. a 110 10 00$ KM WO 0 01 L K OR 00110114[ •ILL 0801 K 7201001 Iwo 0 K 401 101 R0 COME. 101127 0014* 043 01 4 00214 NCI UMW* NIL X 0450 K 00 M * 0I s t K 000000 140.4 OM .0 MR 00 001 4 00000 .MOSS 00 RI01010 K 0010 or K ter. 4410 0 WK 0aat0 1 441404700(00ski * IU100 a MI h. a 0 538404 •0004 00 4 011114006 a 1045 w Oa( 113 600° CO 06040 600. 00 MOS 0 K 000 WA MAO WWI AND) 0 M 05!00 K 04.5(011 14(0061 II 10 0010901 a 0* 0411 014 (WWL* 4001.04 IOW ha 0Yc MM 0. 4.10 wan 414011 0/000 610 O. 00M ODIC 1114041041 K01l, MOD 0 00 6 440 RAMO 00 K Alma 0771X001 .11•101 P710t* 1* 01 440020 ( 4 14®41 (111 0000 *111 0 4A170A O 0001 o0(O * fa 40 00 00 10 000 M 1,WWa . 01011 10(01101 0 1001 10 *6SWO0K 00 D1001 1510 0110( 004150 4000 4 4. 0001®!100, 100 M 00101 04110210L<Ew .HONK 000 oh. •IWO10M5 but ti. 06 700 410051 0! 1.101 0 00000• 007404 MVPS 0* 000Koot 004 MM. Doha* 40 004 Oh 0V MOOR • 006 •.(•AR 0400 • 0000 0(01 11[ ../p 1101R a 000810. no K 10016 a 4 0010405 400 0 011 41100 043 had 0006 00 0004401 •15 fala 00 706 R K 2090040 6 0490 400 MEMO K 0O01Y. 000 000 004X11. 0027411 103112 0031411at / !OK 400106 re( 1000131. 101 K 4044 K 0000 1000 R 010 to 04 4 00Ra01CMS KOOS r.; -�w wr41E6 below. Call boforo you dig. (A mu 1010 ow . • O'0010C1 M *E men mco Mt 10 Yu wo 1-t O /OD A OD 4 00141 + 1 rev 0100 0 (1010 911110 V!4 000 * t� .110 1111 114 w 0 rag 05 0* � 04 man 100 4101 (m 50' Oa L3 mho OO9W` 0104 C041 •101 4 awrO. 0 40. *00(111 0•.4 34000 K[0100 0 00151 0010 at 1410 IWO 1 4 0030.5 Or IN 050) 0* 103 100 010 110116 001 a 001001 K 00100 0060410 r K 0* 000,40.040064401001 K 0030 00* •OA 79 M(04101 40 000 30.10RMw 400(00/0 MCC 101040 1 IOC 00400/UM MO. 0001114 RI PM 1100.0011140 KO 0 WC. 014 1 M 01* 0400 0 11001 341!40 4116 !1U wt 00000 •• OMR ON PL 00000 0 K L0 6 00040 040 0 00 4/ MI 1•Ma. 1/ 1401003 I•15 00 0 1 00.110 Nu ha 1 OORl11 h 01 M I P 1022 MO • 1110 Mon Of 041034 0000 414 94* 1001*1 Pat *1480 a W00*00Ohl 1191E9 01 Mb 00 000 44 4 00040 (00( K Mesh 0 0.110 N*0 00. 040 00 0•01 4 114 00.000 01015 ON *0(00. 4 14 03405011.0 010 SO 1011. 410001 h.. 11400 00 0040 10 MOM 10110.1 • 004490 a 0 OR LOG K 000 042* 4 *0900100114(0.5410.0 7 0 0 COMM 100446 4 0040 0110 0000.4 v 014000410(111•0 Mk O IaW q *Kahl 141177 0 O•w. 11150 0 4 Cr 04502/141.00 1 0 0640 0 01 eab°0000 • at 14104 0 °0 I K 03077111145 1404 4010 004711001 COP* 005111 a * *0400 I Doh 00 4 40040 *40 000400 P V00100 000041 00 4 10000 913 R 694.90(0 004 00 0121201100106 4 0001 MC 00014 000 OM 04* 0000 *3021 0010 AMC. COMM 0 4 140404/151•112 1.00 4H00104010 K 104, 000118 Oar 0 00304011.00 01 0014,4411(0 0101 191 60.444 •04011 911 6 OM K .0410 10 14 40001 CROWS M OM 61(40.800 Ma OJ 101 00 140 0 1 00. 41 w. 1_ 6 0 4 0 044 1 i 100(4( 095 °011001 (• /100 0 K Oa a 01 001 00 00 11 X(01100400* au Oh Anale GONE 00 011R10 OC 010100 00.71610 0*00 10201 001100 0170472•1341 741* 4034 o3 10 016(41 0•1 000 010 •01 01.100 a 0010 10 0 010 401 010001 ON 44074 *0000* *4 40103 Mal MR 400000/0 1 03 040 a 004 0044 WI NO K KIM/ MCP) 0 0.50 K *WW1 0 4 0•0500 0040 O0. 00 040 *00 0601001 *401 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULE ATM -13 WWII 10)1. POL( CC � PR 0 O 1p JEC /1 T 1 1 N0. 1V2� d ry DARE (/13,/11 1/03/11 5/20/11 DESCRIPTION 1X0• m Rh. 5> 0 01' PLANS PREPARED 9Y ( 411i Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. lnc. 1350 0040144 ROAD Sult8 100 CORONA, CA 92002 Or)0f: (909) 480 -2470 ` lA (90) 6992 311 +_.. - .. Cy6NF 7 CROWN ■00 0EAIER A5E SATE 75!' *(1112. WA 06109 0 .0/0.wro4N.00m 511E NO_ TM -1 41E NAME R AO0RESS: RENECIIIA NEUMil (lOI) I.% 0 6 61 1016116.4V414*6101618E67(. -.- IEMECUTA CA 92'+92 S*REE E1R0: 1A. tcir eViral IBS Rua,rs Prism E. I#rwrw' Nish 1 oqw�� +•p•.rw• w •.... `FLEX WAVE PRISM • MUTH RRIf/ ILL ALA OIVIi10i 1••■••.s1•• KATHREIN ANTENNA 840 -10525 PtJ.a.•r DO IOTA •2 Si.: F". ... _- R�.•a ; 11 , .V , ve h ..16• •••.. + •. ..r KIITHREIfi SC:ALA DIVISION .. •∎•• Tr -z c = • KATHREIN ANTENNA 800.10270 NI MO 9.5 n. "WWII A.a•... TM -13 i1W ULTi 50 l 14,1 671L LC9 PRO(CT 113. 142829 DATE 1/13/11 1/13/11 5/26/11 DESCRIPT0N r.m POI 01, 151Ul 0 106 .SSUL 616K ME.6210 dr W MaximIzeComm. e Group, n,c. 1551 P01,05A 90A0 S LAM 100 CONDAA. G 95882 NICE (909) 768 -2210 FAX. (909) 992 -3113 CIKAl CROWN 1 2 : 1100 OE0TER AYE. SUITE 260 SEATTLE.. 11+6 98109 0e von, SITE NO.: TM -13 SITE ANA Q ADDRESS: !DECO HEIWO!8( NOO 13 m 91151N06 OM Si SAN N ONIA 01111 186 1000C1AA G 92592 ( 5611(1 TOIL IL At A I Y 1'fU f'E'it;AVI 361122 dr: GECKO) try 1O 20 SHEET 211n10ER. T3 16+.0120 6Y. (0+ 693020 3 PHOTOSIM _VICINITY M SITE PHOTO - VIEW 2 L,y ■ iI 3I SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 T -13 CU c0E1E SIREEI 0 Cnl P01L co RRO,EC1 0 142829 Alai 1/1 1/13/11 S /21/11 0ESCR:P0l09 nv A AV& v KWa6 IO1 M :SSu O (OA l4 M •S0U1 WI♦ Ct0Nl. P. A11S PHE .WID .Y 1 Maximize Comm. Group. Inc. 1361 351 POMONA ROAD 00 .11: 100 A C 0R0 . CA 92802 Ofr■OE; (904) '1011 -2170 f qv (909) 992 -3113 C O\ C-RC)t,VN 1100 CENTER An, 5u0E - 200 5611113- 11'A 90109 S11i :C 1' M -13 011( NAME 0 AOORE55. 1Es*cuiA NUNYNN NODE 13 Jan 001001011111.X Taff MIIIMO00110 1(0)1AAA CA 97597 ( 511(1:1 1111E t Z.,.�. :1, 01 ::0F0 •l. ,SAO Pt 1 Eu Solt (1 Nw11( a \1 P1 3 1.AL 1YO1T1Q w0 1088710. d 1ROQOROIw ORIM1 RATS OR 5.►F.8IUA6 vow. 91 Pc Two 1w1¢ .1.0E a s1 8C 11WM10 Mows RROOS 10604.1t. 90 E1PAW1811 o tea 1180 Ag1IA1011ANts 9w 0811 60008005 AAE 0001. 81[ 119111400108 8180. Da 5880808890011 WARMS TO 111016111 Au 0180118 ID.LB on.u0O0 11808 NOT D10w OR Ma 91 R6008* OY DAUM 0880801 woes 1 H O L E o Au MARC WADIES E0ASTOAV41 ENLARGED SITE PLAN Know wMrs below. Callbefore you dig. SITE PLAN „t ag' , / / / TM -13 11 Law*. 8911 910..0 PAL 2196. 01 8 8 8. 491-01 t,: NORTH TM — 3 110N0RETE 580801 11 POLL 000 � PR O _ 1 EC y i M 142029 1/13/11 1 /1 / 5/28/11 AMP OTSCYOPf10N 10 fowl TV Pala an AnotOlow CIIEIAT, PLARS PREPARE() RV; /y . Maximize Comm. r * Group, Inc 1 351 1090tH ROAD 510 100 0 09014, CA 92882 O FFICE: (909) 786 -2170 MX: (909) 992 -3113 ▪ • ••■• . owe • CRO . ( 1� r1 1100 DEXTER AVE SATE 250 SEA 00 TLE, 7911 98109 ▪ 0.0rtie com I9tE NO.: TM -13 9111 WORE Q 11000855 IFI�CIKA KAIAK Int 13 (91Fif MME: 511E PLAN RA119 01 VG 918 NUMBER A "LIECXED 6Y: SC 1 ) 84 61 DA 1Ev15000: 3 NOTICE 14 1 •.• 4 SOUTH ELEVATION 32' CONGOETT. STREET UCHT P01E s' CO (I) Air IN Kt. 4p A tPM (3( 0.4014101114.1 1. NO .I..23 9µD ASO1.1 100+7 V AM KI1 r0 YMCA OW. 0.1N 4040 111114V( P.. 4401 KM Z•1 =...sINNOP:t agar ea O 4W 10.01.1 Chop. lllr .1u ( � ew SOAIM (10 1131:0)4 r OM 2 EAST ELEVATION TM -13 CONCAEIE S950T 11p1T £ .E 11202.7 1/13/11 1/13/11 5/26/11 (MP DE3CT6PT10N tO nova. P OC419004 14 OI• KL C4nOr M0 E0 FOR P1/W5 PR PA9E9 00. �� Maximize Carn i. � � Group, Inc. 1351 POMONA ROAD 30115 (00 50R0r.r, CA 921162 005150: (929) 766 -2170 FM: (909) 992 -3113 0.0141 [ i9wR )t!( N 1100 DEXTER AVE STATE 250 SEATTLE. WA 95109 ..v.cuo.ncc,09tom I BTE NO.: TM - 13 9TE NAME R ADORE53 TEWEIAA NEW( NODE 13 50009 60160U, Wtl050'1991140m TEMEC019 06 92592 n+.. �i ORTH ELEVATI • N ::i9i.•L -•. ktri.1521flearia62", � . WE ELEVA ill TM - 1 3 COVCREtt S1Rft1 WR POIE CCI 60 142829 REV. 2 M1E 1/13/11 1/13/11 5/26/11 OESCROWION 20 IOW 1a RJ1 OIY 91190.7101. 1 125000 FOR: CURRENT 252E 0120. 5/26, PIS PREP2009 OI' 6.1 Maximize Caren. W Group, tnc. 1 351 P0Y0W1 ROAD soot 100 CORONA. CA 62662 U50201 (909) 766 -4170 FAX (909) 992 -3113 LI � RRr 1100 DEXTER AVE. WYE 250 SEATTLE. WA 96109 •••.C.OMCOSUO.C9T "sit No.: TM-1 3 91E NAME & AOORE50 IRECIAA IIIWORK NCO( 13 79 816 seam. ccwour FEYEC0IA CA 92392 nriz (s.ut ELEVA11ON5 010CKFD 82: 50 WH 6Y: 22 S HEET NWOER. A3 me ren.F, Caws co more . •1 1n.. Mt looltD gl 00LL 1i.N11 NOf'1.0 MO WN J(ALI 6 M.( N0 1 41!0 MO 4044- AHOC x'ID LQllleel m 1,[ 41410,0 a v1 0, ((( SY 84.47 mm too ra.0 c ar 410 TA Met H 40 0 (( Z1'410YxA1 D, . NII1VW ; :..71-C3,1:1 fYl 11N 4141008( HIYI . r 41 KW ,401 Rfl xLLl DATA TABLE Warta INOTL !WU Me MT Or WY 1814 KONA 1'A0 001 IOWA 00.370 00Vm a MA00 WAR.A Kt um. Mtt0n1I:. a ...lbw WA Mee !•1080 wan 11417 •r 1W 000041 TM 014110410. 7(/4 MAO I001A0/Mal.m OM It 1.017 77 a 60 101. 0400 WA RN. 1R AM WA 100.Same /MA WA 041 !01000[ (7/A MI70 WA /(00110* WM WA M0.00*1 8/01.04010 nee NOW a 1e' M[ D/ OPRR01n0 00 0177 1WM M1 ; - WA a N4 n< laAron , —,1. N1100, 01NRJ6 04x, 0+104 04700 1 104 SHEET INDEX oat WOWS. T1 r 0•1111 T2 WOIN e000 NO swam TS 111.00440.6 InCraNm• P1 1004 MOM Al AZ 110 K. SA M4 J_. (\ oa r �7 A3 084176 1 1 I 1 II ;, I 1 }1 I SIIF PROJECT DESCRIPTION ITM -20` TM -20 NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE EAST SIDE MORAGA RD., 310' SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPLICANT Meg ocr0 oA1'li i, )04 tit owr 77 m. n W 1,01 or. (1M> , 11.87 nine OM) (tars 70007. 3v1m, WI. LICK (N» 003 -11•1 e 8704 + 74'1.0 (»0) 000 -0100 Cee.KT. ewe. ■711. ND37 11.-1111 Vert 0*0700iy Wort 00 .0 mx (101) eow0 ,JURISDICTION 41 Cr 01 Mae. 4000 u1N rt. nee 1.00 701) 004-!10 4840 (017 •••5 ENGINEERING FIRM/SURVEYING a� 08/0040801 8101., 110 MOM 1a. ifirtOLL IM-115 -0431 0•04!-]1,, COORDINATES Si -1 01.1810 /7\CROWN a L ASJLE CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS CODE COMPLIANCC: Al wet NO WOMB 11.11 I[ 0808+00 • IOWNWI w AW010N[t 1031 M1C x04141 0106 a 04 Mow. wan A3 mono rt LIXM. ammo. 007 113 N• lccwvr. /Cars 801.04:7 . m 71181110:1,(1 1 81/0114 *00. 001 00 • 11 VICINITY MAP REV. 2 1551/E0 OD44Dn ,'INNS (010110 71: 4:- Maximize Comm. 5 Group, Inc. 1 351 PCNOlA RD S URE (ID ( 010141 OA 02582 OFFICE: (000) 785 -2170 F A)( . (000) 092-3113 ••-• _ / Cf4c000 517021 04,141 FCAE DATE 2/5/17 5/78/17 FOR co PRISM 1A. 8CA-007 ISSUE DESCRPRON OR5P REVRION PER CFI( m OCATION GATE ', OCAS T" 1100 OM ER ME. 2411E 250 s� TTLF, WA 01104 .8071140 0N.mm (20107 RILE: (TI.E 51 Ef �DMMN m: t:14(04E1) Of: V0 SC 21-2(1 004000 T1 4/410(774 7l E1r !,50464: 2 A J SITE NO.: TM -20 111E 'WIC 04 48011522: BE JLt CM MA 20 10v1:1611.,*MNO®alma 1101(CLU CA 92302 WI a CAW a01C0iLI AY 10 s 00 11 00 0 1 0 T011711 001 -1 2 1/11 0 IM .H WM 0 1/1 0rj 70 NI 2111 20-1 t 1/11 `001000010 °011L1 Y•0* 4 KV 1 Q 000 0101 O ow /010 7 0110 0001 • our 00 /0 ❑ 01010 • 00 01 • 301 0.41 Q Ao. 000 00 - - - - 111700Y•0* 001 Q -- 01 UM M1 3,1* - - -- MOO 3000010/ T 0000 0011 - - -t - - - 1011010 1103 -1- 0101101 0011 - -C - -- 181014 00101 0..0 -40*- 0104001 - yam - 4 - 0010 100 1001 LEGEND 1 1 pI1p0* 10 01010 40 0 01 -YOM OHIOa ®pl�Plp 1 n 1 Oat■ Om 00101100014 1010140A�a1010 a 00 10 000010. 110 100101 t 01 011010 M0000 ��0 110401 1021 OW 040010 /Ca MI XS 0 0101 1100000 IN000A t00A00M0011210 a 01000{1. 000/ {10 x 0100 0:10. 0 01 010 00 • u 01021 ti Mt 40001 a 00 010 M 00 I 0 MI 01111 0 A 100 0110 AO 000004 t 00 000 0 00 1 0110 IM 100 1 U/ 40 00M 100 0111001 4 04 I810 01101 00001O113, T. 00 1� 0000 /1 0001 W 1100 00 0010 000 M 000 004001000 •Ii>•Yain•• 1:1001 00'10art A 10 000001116 0M1000�0 0 K 000* 01 00100 AO t4,0411== nc /0M 01 0 0 1 . °0W000°00MI0C3.7411,10100 *EOM 111 0 0 000 NCO O00 1i 010 001 0 A It 20°A 100 0100 0 001 00 10001. *1 10 010•10 1.00 PEW= Milt 100 M 0000 0010 SO 100010. 0010015110. • 01410 0000 001 0 VInt 01 10 M 01111010 • 02 1110 1•0 0.011 M 10110M 010• a 004110011101. OM 00 0111000 04 f CO w moo. 0>04. 100010/0103,0 P 0 Pm 01 W 4(1,0100. 00 91 *OIC*a0i0 D • p • 1 � 0 00t p01 M ��apY N 1 Mao AO •••• • 01∎ 000 O4 Of Y K 0 P p IPJ11. ) MO . TM M10 a 1 20 0 11 0 = 100110 A 2 tj•1.0*2 12000 • 1000 0 040 M • 4 *00 100000 101 301011* 4(004 • 0 00400 004a0011 01 00th * 4 / 0010 4(p X01 0ep. 0144( 001 =1t0111a10tl 1 3=...001 Y IL 0 p� 0..110E 0104 •1 1110000 K 100 P It 10 K 0001001 01 1 000 0 004 0 M 0001011 MA NO MAAT0 AAA 0 AL 100 *11EM 1I 000 00*1000 4 0 .a at • 0701 0.1 M 100111111 00 0 • n O 00 x001111 100111100 It.01° 0YA014 0010 1011 MO 1110 1011117 001011141 1000 • 0 000 001102 010 000a 101 00.7 l (100 MO Mil 0100 9010 ill 1000 00 NC 0 la Orr 0010 000 010140 WI*OOIT OVOtf9MM7101 Mt 1. 100104 11 0101 q 0/20010*101001111 1114IMI 111(0 014 01 01 0 0 P M 000800 M 110 0 100 1001 40000 1 - .00111 0 100100 010 MM 000 0 100R 110 1. ▪ 10/010010 111 002 00 0111 0011 0 /aapt IMO x 000 00010 V>• 100 PC 1� 01 0•1110 it N * 0 00111011/ 01114 01 10 0 01 110011 10001 tea{ •100 1/! 1 Y PM 0 110 0 00000 NO 0( 0 0 01 10 101101421111 1010 II COY 0000000 M 0/000000/ 010000010.10 003,0 Mt 101 MIU011110000100020100 21 000 0 01000 0 • ILL 01 SA AMY 00110 I MO00010040 0094 P 0 MI 0011010 00 0 AMOG 000 OUR A 100/ 000020 4 x 0101 0000 MM M 100001 MOO 4 IMO 0• tl 0400 Mot i *011111000000 �101' 0401040101 M 001 tOi1N 4YI.nO1001.1i00 000 Pa 00 al 03,{0 M 1 1 0 0 01 MORMON 11000 100 r 100 1 It 00 010 010 /0 100 00 0 10 1111•1111111• 000101006 0 NI 1014000 0110 1002010011111011111 0/0 II M 00010101 t 000010/ i11011 10100MM10110701 MOM M 0004M 0011 M°1tt 111 ° 00 00{ � PA 04101110110 NIL 000 x 000 P PM 10011 KIROVNW 010 WO 0000x010040'110000 0010 1M10 Mt COL M 09001//0011 M 1000* 11 101101100 8010 10 000 004 01110 0100 01001 0 00 111 11010 0 000 10 0 01 hl 00 00 101 01 MA P 007004 0 00 10 100 0 ^1010/0 %ML�0 0/0/10010 01 0900 000 000'00 011111.10 4 0 001°1 1 x 1104 0' 1 0101• 00 0 1 11 11 0100001410000040110010[ 0 /0 0 1011 11 P 01001010101 n RAIN 110 • MOW 0114 1100 11 000 WILL 011110 in TM 000ry 100 00 40 00000 0 0 • 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 D COMMA (MAO1. 04 0.01110 0 141. 10 4 10 0 0 0 111 • 11• 0 11111•10 00•1001 01 010 ••••• 00 Yt• ••••••• 11411 MMINOM AMA i 0 111°0 PC 10 001110 13, 100110 • 001111 01/111 *10011 041 4010100 M 113. 101010 1 000010' Nato x000 1 01 0 0000101 M/ 11104001010 0001 01 000 /0 00 0100 00 M 0 01 10 111 00 0 0 014 NM 00 AO • / ▪ 6 10*~ 100011104010/000 010 000 Oa • 10 4 0 MO 100000001/OM 040010/0 VII 101 • 0 00A14*101p0* 1110t10 > 0.41024 M 10 0 00 0 000 0 1M0000000 MI 14 00 10.1101111111010 01/ aM 4 01 Si 4 0001100010/MR 111 0 0 600 000 001 0000 MIN 0 0/11000 1 00A 0�01 010 /11101110 MON 010 Ms 4111 M OM 00001 NA t M 000 0 00 11010011A11 W11a(11 ML /100Lypi 1 00 00 1111 .. 11i0 ^ * *1110. t 00010014011111/ 00 0010 000 0 0 10 1/000 001 00 • 000 101 1010 101 010E • 14 00110110*1.010 000 00 001 0 100 IN Ot 0010000 * 0 0000 MO 000010010 01011001 00 1 M*0 0 00 ' I/ 0 00m0100 10100 /N8* 11 0 I SIL 0111111.100011 010010011Mw100101 I 0100/ Ai 0101010000010 1 O. 040.1010 010 11110100101111 M 110 M 1 1 10 0000 0 10 1000 0. U. Atli 1000 MOS 0/11 00000 M 0009 0 1011 010* 0MR 000001 10001010000 90010 O 141001 00 0011 00 iM 1 M 00000 00* 110 /01107 1100 00 10 1 0 100 01 0 10[ 011 00 00,0119.lIC 0 0�0 000 001 01 0 011 10 1309M°P 00 00 0 GENERAL NOTES 0.01000110100 :XS 1000 0111. *01100 tt N. 001a 0 1 0 010 x10 1100, 011. O0.10 04* 11100 MO 00 10 4 0 1 1. M W 0010 / R 0 013,00 0 0� C0pOp10 tpi0� N• ti 100 10014110 IOOOO 0104 >r 130111 O 000101//0 . 010 1010 0 Mpog0�,0 0C pry0Gg4� > 00004 Y 00000.1 A r 41 0°10 400, 100111E a 0 1049 0 17 ./r WOO 0900, 0001 00110 X040700071 M 001 MP 0 MAP. • A L MOA O 0 1 000 00 00 10 Mr 11110 • 0001 00 1001 10 101021 i 0 1 000 1 0011/11 10 0000 0 OP MO :104 »lic11°t/ArlPl or mat 18* morn 00 tot 4 2* 10 010090 I WM 01 10 00 0 1100 10 L ■01110 OM 900 100901 0 014 *001 011111 _OOtV 0.11,4=011 0904 1 00 L 000p0 pp av • 011 PC00/ ALT A. 000 00 0 014 00 100 31110 01 1 011 M /000/0010 IL 000 1000 0 .00000 Ca 0 010 0.1 0 M 1009 I Rx 0110 010 PM 01000010/00 0 It t/A 0 ylt00 *01 0001 0100 0 00 000 0 014 1 1101 00. 04 00 1MJC21111LOa0004011 NO Mt 1000 A 10001001*M 41 it . 00110 NI AM MA a 0710011 AMA 000E 9111 010041 10 00 Uml *0001 PAL M WP 0 ON 0411701 91 DI AIRY P 1000 1 100 /,11?1111•TA100 *0 00 11109 r 010 00 1 21110 00 a M0 1. 0100101 0* 1,1 ( 054 A 0 MM16 • 1 1 1 1 C 1 O t � L 1 p al 10001 MO 400 0. 0, 111101 0 01141 rtireliellIFORAPIEL 0101041 111 14001N 01 C ON 0100 0010 a 1 0A141 0 0 0000 11 11010100 0 MI a 1 114 1100{0 Mx 111140 • 00000 0 100 1040.01 ■00410 loaf* 11000. 00 1 0111 R Off 000 000 a 0 1100 aY N.M 1010 M 101011 ▪ I� rf [. I aura-- a 01000010410 ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES i 3 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULES+ 1) ( TM - CaIUIEIC SIRRi 11X4 FOIL Ca PROJECT X3. PI/.NS 0*FPA4(0 [H: • \1 Maximize Comm. 5 Group, Inc. d 1331 001■0!10 RD 0110E 100 C0N0K1, CA o2222 F (90 0 118- 170 X11 1 100 CCM AYE SATE 230 SEATTLE, *A 90109 O 0.CA100010*.00R1 E TM -20 E 0 01000 LA WOK NODE 20 000 YECI*A CA 92092 ( ABET 11111* , WM N'Ji & 50t01.EJ IX10WH 811 CHECKED ET: *(800110 W SC DI ACV IMAM M'I03* T 2j �r FlaxWava" Prim) �.. iMt Nl A•Intrg r.11 Cn.""y Are fnp..rey 0,vvia tin, � we. 1 tir •��'•1•r•lrlw� sib rn,Ye.Yan V!•Irwi1i .ec YV,aM.aOFM.wl IYwwl r•.Mw •.A.w"•nw.arn,r�pwu..rnY6l wl.an6«na• iii•iwa •«:u: w....«.n. rl.. .. n�.w..aa.. „ +.� 1•s,v. 6."4.1..•. rm. w s. . ul •r..a.r...,1w,rw:rr. k •"r �l Y Y-.., vl.,,..wr�..o�wY,ea4•••o,..a.1, rl.W MY, M.°•r WIO✓rIW an1•••V aWYOYr - w.ip..l yllpe� {. M�w�q.. V••v. 114 ▪ PINxWSVS' Prism 0W:1 O+Ido4• W. 0s. CwvraOa Yd Cepatily S aoAuwnc Y MO +•+nan. mow: • Y • MCA MCKIM. lo FLEX WAVE PRISM i • •Ir •r.w. HGTHRE111 RNairry 1w ISM SCALA DIVISION Ofelkslrau'1INIA60N1A4eev1, • •oo Mh.w.Mi••/).7 1 . ' yi..1r2 7t IZi .r %AM, "w 0.101.24 MON • ^./. W�Yrr+. MOO ww.e« .„1.•.... .a11Nl4.— • 1.•w.....«.r.ww•v.. • Nnr..I. Yw.1.rnY .Y.. 1)rtnrbq -_ k 4 ?' Omer 14 IITH SCALA DIVISION Ae; • .. 4 I.1Y/ 141 N•a•inl wl ) ..MO/NM e. ^ `LLyo ". 3 KATHREIN ANTENNA 840 -10525 6 s l i k 01-0}LMY 1 prw�.y•..n�r �1 •W • ��1y . I r Yn n w • r.a... 0y13 7T�• w1Y'l2••.«�"'7"���-.cw`IU�.Y... 1F�tiY1. a.•. w.aa,:w rYC..wwl. •.«r.a..Ow.pi ar n�w..MYw� =UM"' •°6 :Y 1. W M 7.- - M • Tr*"=pw nrn.•.r1 . r ua.. WIOm•� Yn. ✓w..r.. RANNWy /4010605 G• D.Yband 0. Wood MANN. 2 HIITHREI11 SCALA OIVISION OY- ..N ■__w i • r.w �Y1w w l Mww w . .n w Rrr..p ,M 'r I ��,nat O•vOww.M.rr4•wN M M ..7? Mal 000 44444 mom/ • •. ▪ vM woo me. rwr. —7 -•• 7.:i°. Imre ".2,72711=1 w ..mmo two.. mama. .. al .41 "..» . • =XL • 11 .1 3: 3 3 31 3 3 .. Orirolnerlail Mow w 115 HHTHNE111 SCALA DIVISION • • �ewr•�••n KATHRIEN ANTENNA 800.10270 . • I, i. • a p M.rvN... a YO•vw....�.a •M ,w.u.. Irr.....I «n...•• w- YVr.r..• v00 ,r00.4.< s .t= « IV A•I�nw� 740 mar0 000 10070 M' [6!00174 MIM . ( TM- 2o [ SltlEl.T UL•0 luL CU PROJECT N0. SCA-007 2 OATS 2/3/11 5/10/11 0ESCRIPTION DRSP REY1M PER CRY RELOCARON J ISSUED 7011: C0.101NT ISSV'E 6.16 FINe PRE PM[0 Eli: � Maximize Comm. � Group, Inc. 1551 POMONA 00 SURE 100 CORONA, CA 02862 ORCE (000) 701 -2170 6Ay(000)) =B2 -5115 `m `- LA Mr? 100 DOEIER AVE. SURE 250 SCATOf, WA 00100 WIC .7711nc11DO.COM 516 NO.: TM -20 50C NN0E & ADORES& TEAEUILA NEINtl 1( NODE 20 00 LAOIS. W 100 0 1100 000DN TEMECUTA CA 02802 ( 91tEl 0002, M IMACla �FG'EA110N5 1 PHOTOSIM 1e Wu1 VICINITY MAP SITE PHOTO - VIEW 2 2 SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 "TM -20 Optk — - uc 0 rotC 1 REV. OM s 213/11 0/10/1) CURRENT ��. 8CA-0O7 DAI J aaCVARE Ur. Maxlmlze Comm. •179 Group, Inc. 1351 PONO19 RD SURE 100 430600*. CA 92082 OEAC£: (909) 709 -2170 MX: (909) 992 -3113 WENT: 1100 001108 AVE. 9J00 200 SEATI1E, WA 96100 /5122 10.: TM -20 SRE Mit t AOORES& 113E11A NEITON 100E 20 1.01111218111.1 ‘11912116:41001118111 TEMECIRA G 92092 599E7 111121 eX151.04 51Zf110105 P1 2 9RARN 0 Y: EORED 9Y. 1079008 R. YR SC (0 5 1002 t RE1 tp0N: �SO {nanw a wmaaw Unm 141 a S IOwN oil The MAR. wR Wit TIT ■ IO O PAWL( W OR06 CPITIVII2a41010 O1 *NIU O WOe 1N4 UM PACCOMMOorf WABURIM TO MOW V. UMW 1/110* 1011010110*NOT OOI1. OR NOT 010:400 f/ CW10? 0104011 M M0u0 iaO* 1X0010. 00MIIM104 OWL 0001[ > Mb POT 111011 TWA 0 ILL 01100 NUM 8111/1 00RIIINU'1 wt 10 VS MOO 1*3 u (E) PUDUC RIORT OF WAY (E) CUR& (E) GRASS AREA T E) C 0 I (E) CRASS AREA (0) PUBLIC RIORT OF WAY - - - - - (E) JOINT WOOD UTILITY POLE POLE N0. 4409347E TM -20 No PARNING SIGN / \`f l � (0) EDISON w00D Unu1Y POLE N0. 4409348E ENLARGED SITEPLAN r -1 � :' �? NORTH SITE PLAN ( TM - 2O CTIKRETL STRR7 11d? POLL C0 P800 1 to. 8CA-007 l REV. aATL 1 2/3/11 2 6/16/1* DESCRIPTION DMA REVISION PER CRY ISSUED rote PINS PREPARED MI \ W Maximize Comm. 9 Group, Inc. 1 361 PONONA RD SLICE 100 CORONA, CA 921102 OF0'CE (000) 780 -2170 FAX; (000) 002 -3113 IVJV y 1100 O03*00 AYE. SUITE 260 SEAM. NA 00109 ` w...emwnc4.61Ao111 S1IE 1 TM -20 1U EUU t(1NORK OE 20 0119XISMR11 _.01090 t TEYECULA CA 92892 (1800T 1111.L: NOTCE Cod lliiVin. tar- • — —• rS NORTH ELEVATION 2 WI ST ELEVATION ( TM-2o 311011 um Par PR900f ND. 8CA -007 r REV. 2 0010 2/3/11 3/10/11 DESCRIPTION 9RSP 00•3I00 PER CRY 4 NO, PI402 PREPARCO 9Y+ • ■ i. Maximize Comm. j Group, Inc. 1381 POMONA 00 RUDE 100 CORONA. CA 92902 OPY130. MO 700-2 i (000) 0092 - 3113 •r r a■or .v... CUENt: 1100 OEX1EA AYE. SUITE 200 SPA1110. NA 99109 ■nn.om.n. M.com TM -20 511E 0900 x 9000E951 HEW IIETM'ORK NODE 20 axlxloxa /01)110•001116111 1ERECIAA CA 92902 (SNECT STU: AWN MY LOCO DY oPPSOAD SPRET w 50 of A2 2 2 NOTICE meusnussoir 2 IN14�alr�• MIIMME SOUTH ELEVATION WM 2 EAST ECEVATIOFI TM -20 DD9CR4 t 37RIiT U0/0 P lL Ca P901Rr1 N0. $CA -007 DESCR8PIgN 1 DROP RaN90N PER CRY RElOCAN3N PUNS PREPARED 0/: 4 1 • Maximize Comm. j 9 Group, Inc. 1 361 PO410IN RD SORE 100 CONO/4. CA 82882 OM CE (908) 786 -2170 000 (909) 992 -3113 •ter *.... [08'4 �� WA 48 260 TM -20 SEE NM1E t /O0RESS: 1EYEODU NEIM NODE 20 9rswaala9voaRwa 7TDIECtOA d 92892 SOECT 11RE: CI,rYAtl�i1J� l�/ V VA'\ CR0WN TM -26 NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE �ouT W .AST SIDE OF LA SERENA WAY. 195' SOyou'64 AST U fi OF C/L OF CALLE PINA COLADA TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPLICANT cram P76E 01198414.4 1100 60004 kW SLOE 170 arAT114 M 0010 740.00 06011* 4\00• tq.[ 000 133.010 ,LVRISDICTION C. S 1144570 11 0•0 070 70•710 IN 051) 00.070 CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS TCONTACTS W WO N �1EW 1;081 `O 1v0r 04)' 117.070 Nw 090 110.101 M 00.09(0 DAMN PW00 1000 000 010 -0140 401 A OMYP* 7 011790 (OP) 304 -101 10 , Tl 0901. 180 11004 1199c X 40-3197 ENGINEERING FIRM /SURVEYING CODE COMPLIANCE: , IS Y1wcP7 y Np.V1 60(.. wC 046.0 N °,L 04100.01 48401 0 O p 6 or 4UW1 100 40 70110010 O07.7 AS *000141 Or 301 00R0 “4 01100'0. r,. 0040005 ND 1007. /071/007 00300005 10100 VA-MS -071 1. 00 Oats. 100104.6 0070 770 00-11112-1113 COORDINATES 701: 131)01 tan .427 m0. 0.6701041Kh 0000 K 0,0 11 0 ,6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 06144 7011 i ::M✓a: ° 10011�Lm 1 2.• �.z 7 0117[ I411*1 B 00 101) a r t � 6. SSW 001 AmtV0S 017301' L 10.0 716*6. 1061 0000.X5 OM Ms1YA115• n(0IA4 l' t Moles ra 7' W[M/06004001 07a 945)14 31 nom 01090 1001 Ko[9w. IAO qMq 4 ;mom UAYI 0110070 07 [(0070 MVO 00906001 SWISS NW 000000 000( 8WO 1001(W0( 4A 1 Wt 10,{ 7100 000 OK11W0t ONlrr ya — — Mt W 0I091/190W1 4want 70010 10.111"1 NR 000P00 T1 Au 0600 r2 oaf re 000100 T3 959 /I0 11 [ mewed' P1 91[ 1 161(4 Al IN 0008 A2 84 6*6 A3 t11Y0tl0 VICINITY MAP 6/1 Wilk 040 0 WT NPs • ion or au NA 0/A 8/A ISLA DATA TABLE 0.6 WON 0 M/ O0R10I sr 11999 N9 10011 P /A 010)17w 1,.. *9039 Mi0hM N f OV[ YY 1 R Nrt�l,. . tY_ A4.r W IN0 X7010 06 110FM[ NSW/ [0499[0 0010 V.1.1 SHEET INDEX 1 TM -26 � 00/9511( 5116LI 1678) PLAL 0142E 1/26/11 6 /3/ oIRE 1 [SSUL 6■•■•1 [NE 40. Ca PIIW' LCT MO 142629 .75424 OCSCRIPRI0N ORSP NEWS** PLR Cm RELOCA114N O K. DIN KA, 19,1.9111 .., 4 Maximize Comm � GG roup, Inc. 1 331 POMONA ROAD SURE 100 C ORONA CA 921362 O FFICE( (909) 760 -2110 F AX: (009) 992 -3113 1 103 DEXTER AVE, SURE 250 SEATTLE, WA 90109 Ut n„ ANNNRA .0om 09 ME rtE nneMr rat 1371 alEC0E0 Br. 7AATU PC A► Cu EHfCt�NY6V 1 017.31.71 T1 2 NNE TM -26 RE NE & ADORES50 TEMECULA NE11 ORK NUUL 26 l900(1P;1Li90.10t/i o Nil num* 7(51ECU1A CA 9259? J NITIAKIIISCAlLTICSIOUIA - ..i MY WI 110t4 40.1 V Pi 7 .w r 019 " r0, Jr- • 1/l• 104 112 1m. 41IN C1 110 Nob 31 a I /!' 1100 Or 04111111 NO MS fi•• 4 1 /3 ' 147 roa -__.n .7.__._ 00f117A4/15C ALLE0,0,411112E - ..i MY 03014 4.4/V.- cal .Y. %Cr .77 .•.• • ,31„411 7001011{. IT •• ) 1111' 1 04 1m. 41IN C1 110 Nob 31 a I /!' y Or 04111111 NO MS fi•• 4 1 /3 ' 11vr13.•••••v ar01.006•iv1N LEGEND 11.a4GllrtlOgY• T •1I'33JI,lr 0l *s-- w1 *,241* 01 f $70 t 1 11; PV:t0 1T04 to . 0 • 4(Lehtr •t• 41.10. 100.., 110.. 07. u1. 091 *!1•µ60r, aN un•3'!N 1∎7 .Vh el o(un{1,0 Cr . KrIl •.00.•70 011147:0 I. 01004 M : 020$ • 00 1 h fib' UN41[, 4: 01.04 31111MICSAJ m, • 14•0441/ w4 (e /. 9 (r11r 110 ▪ ...W. W Q 00 .47..•11 - - - rn0Nn1/ff *: •17 RN 30.1 - -- -70.141 betvia - , 1!11144 10.61 • -f- 01 to 7:1 (wa - f4W1 40.1 1031 Cwn f.A. V1 . 1/I- 1p:WC00'.01u 11/1 o1xs - -• -- � ct w Y 011 a •1* *0 0 3111 N c ' . / ' 00 w0 f 700 J lvvell S01 •!Y 77.0 {39431, Ip3 fD 441 o wn 706 4 : 473 rx:L '03 a 314 v. Ni f 411.4V1 W 0. 4* 1401140604.00 *,• 1/r INC •03_ 34401fLBIa0s 11m{5 24 1rw4 VMV 1.A 14011 11.0 02010 .•* 1 11 %a 104.0 40, 1 tt LN e WC .100 11.2 W./11•047 33 100113 40 110 00, 1,131 .. 03 •0101301 4= 0 434 •0111 1 6/3022r 10 1104 103 1 i• )ai Ny W P •111). *41 •1 aorta 41.7 1 4r 0.0 447 443.11 • 4 C�(. =11 111 111 111.1121.• 011 r 2. ;toe 0323 400. 40, 1x3 0 1 1 P0P.. 4 03 1 4 631: .51444 43 0 70120 9mr•s 3r 11) •9{0 rx • 111 IW 4 110,11211! U11000*3041)41103010.1 .14400w.••3( 010111112 MeV. N1K t *4140 *411 lO0e le 1.1.1 ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES 1 mNw 1M0RYV06Y 137 WMW<4b 20370 .7.21 4104'4 4.004 0010 Lea. MP 4 vt 10011<1..7.710004 YT (11 JOC •1•.. WA/ WO 34 -.4•ta 4 {DIa4.. *091) 1.0 4 w W. Iw 30,(;1.041141704 SA• • flow ft. mow Y.M'••• 1.N •1<. 1470.2,0447 • r /067.1..1 *111342* 0•01.1.60 f •31•{ 14 a3c'•0) 771) Y r 1P1.1a014. watts • a• 0..0.4.4•.•23.7 0113 PI1R a 1100* S Ifrt' <1 l: 31.0 1r 0• q Al 2 •a 2594 .01 •37•011.71111•'. 511.1 1.11.0.-. m Pr W r 1 10.•,•14 3117.44.. 1014.. 101111 SOW WINO NO 13/33114 x .1.200 lw Pe. b 0(3011.-4111x.n *1.0* *4 WA V( 12 010.1 etwoe COP.P1 a1.11NV M 70701' .41.41711(03*100404 OE 011451.00 (03244170 t W 34 04 as 404704..1 (44.1 1.1140 4 13471.001 .V.w 1,1 00,124.0.470•16.21.120 4 *o YA W V. .04191 Irf ••0. an101.:2II n *r] CCULIMmiligInjw 11 „ 1( 0 a 02w0011 u 4. 1..04 1014. Y 417.44. 144141.006 00 4 O lu l ir P 0 )... i? 17041. o' WOb M. 01 M _ �1P•0H 1 a4rI Y1N eM ,1.01111 • . 4 a .144 .6411m 11.41• •r /0•011 02 10 • r *r1. 011 (030* * 4•1404161 raw! 1164 10 00 4w T* • 1374 703• Y w • 07131! *44 1•041 4 .a.nw 1!,174. YIIM no Crr/ Kr. ( un.(*0 10 0.4041 10.11114. , 21t +N i ]J 04 V14Y.1: 1wpf.1.�C"lwtw.OiaL.l wrl- 440 0 V 1 � Y ioa rs • 00..44 W mane • 4 wi •n., * e. 4 471 1111 4 7 4woa 103. rr 4 n. \. noel �i�a` -1`.11 v 3wxjlf � wry4�4V9 W 11 4 ° ..i 4 ..�v 1 +�1 1 'wn 1.a •4 .40:•:05 a a" r i� 014*0. 4 (4 iur�••lI 4 Cw e* 32437 1, m�.l g1f'''T 1+ V 0430 ID0N 414(13 70.60*40 17.0.433 4000,.01 tt 34 +a<T . 1 . ws r•.., 114 44.711231 44444 r /.4011 10•1140• 1•41 11 417050•1 141 1.0.10 41• M.A. 0401 44 00 0.•4111154 7 01 7121.+ . 17.31\c'(w. 1. . 1 3... V1 .r1111. 4 00$1•4 *,0701201 73 {.41. w 9M1'•r10. 6.1.14 11.40 7O *At ]/t1. 1" 1 r /1704(4 IV 0310x:.w /11 W..... 0 0Pr40•.00010110,10, 10 1. (WU iV 7*04. 1V• *01(1 - 0.4. .1111 07101(43,0101711 .¢V 0 Van 004*400444.109141610704404101 11 M 1 A 1 1,3043 1/4.40 f W. 4 00.44 le .15 *W. 011110 0441* 1.7104 1f 1201 p 041. 1 01.1 /4. RT* 0913.,,413 w 1.K 14.4 0.4. x040 M.O. 0. r t.% ¢ 14141 va• GENERAL. NOTES *009914 maaraclim tor y4 / os r32 24 I .ttare. 10 ( ( .1+. 1.3.4.4 1 ntf 1119 0.0 '4 40000 •.11 x.I crow; v VO 170 'n *W0 11 :140. V.0 10,1 1111 ml N 371.3 00 *00 1*O. 0 0 ...WS *444 WO O.1. m 1.01 0.1 t uK 9 00 *I 1 .12 0463 O ..l 74 4 el waxy V7 10 70 3704') 0 21 0... f4.g:600 040 31. MIAN 144. 14)00 37144 •04113 Y1+R 431 A 2 i•irii Y ai 3 911► c v 1.4 ew�131: M 1.7 L cr•Kts 3 f e b • v 1. P Mr Inn 11x04 4 (33 1 0 • Y $.1411141.1 1 140044.47131013It0 . )0033* 10UA 4 40'1040 74.15709..00 4 4411 ✓ l : m( c 403 1 3a00MI11013 0Cn foal a•u. a mown 4 m J 121••••71 N V. • O.t 7004••..1 *1410_ • � 1 J..r0 �y ...4 a r 91 1.•.N Jot* .( mw• 1 4.13.161 b 144 wIP,...Jr. 430 11410.1)4 406230 . 4 flU0*''S00 41010. r• .w::0141.4 1 M (0100 .ry 1 •110'1 \l►Xq Y /'T..O 1 4:I f *4 00 441.100 401\ 1 17 4111rftl•4140'101 la an +wGV M M •MOYC 3 nor 12 1.',01141. w 114.0...n11100 411.4Ee/ 4 *00 4n*..7alrw 51.211 1 5,11 14 w3 7 113.0.• 111e •+.1111 n P nrf •0104 .! 4VO411L ✓411•0 411: I '. At V 0* 14u1, 1e1. 1 00( W3N•4M*l7 *** Ip •11•wan P+1'/F,0 .7. 0.114•2.. 4, 00 llamas at. 41f vM o : w�o .002•• PU 04 o Y 111 E an * M. Prw w. I * Nq J . (4 114 P, 64/1.M13. 11 1.1[. gull.ef/.1Ku 114. Yr.4:1 true •1r u/� 1 •t Po 1.00J•0vi. Nt, ••1.4112.0 PV. 11.11. w 0V01. MC 3 4 W.J111q:4.10.o n .411 4.401070 00, • a ✓x7.14 pr. tro • •. 11 44 '.311..1 p1221. /0 O.7. 010 eon .4.,•. •'N 4.3.1 V 1. In, Minn iii 211 m•/ • • 0 110• 11.11 1 744* WY • 4.414' 4 4000 0 , 1 cll .ta. 0 PO, 140* • Vq 7MSN1605 1 04/. 101 0 2 MAO 7112111012 14 Vw 91.711044141 * 00041110 *4.4 at10 1 .11141••4. 141131 >v Y 44441 10 . 44. . P 7 rn•�Y 41• Ifn Olt n'.• 4 KYCO Obe. t4' 470. 00.12441 *010. I 1 41*1 *'H 4 . 1111• 1w Y14r 4r 14 eT'n11M0. Y 1 41. ✓*1110 /Ij0110i 1• IL [OVA H01'f. 1,13.1.3. LVOY. aor I %N.pot 4Nl, 1 ∎1 3 0 10111.51 .ton 70.••• 41 14111 • w•0, 1Vq 1lM Wp'4aV 121/06 r • 4.111 YI4 1 .:0 7 4.•41 030(74147 0:10011..4:2 • 017 04026 • 0444 01.w1.a2br. 1 •420. m14M • 0).04144044, WI 10 0011014140,4414:aP.1i Mot317 130 0 00110 1 0707 30.30'4IW . 31•* 0.3'0301 It,4V P,1*in P I/.1• 14 +, M 41101000 M120 4 311 0121 7011 . 717 1 a� 1 �i� • 4 3 0110111ti3 N iota* Mw3a' aW • 41 P11011011 I1V00000 r. *•1U4•J loaf 11701(♦ <•R Iw VW(lt! Know what's below. Calmero a you dlg. can 1•A931.wVID•111i1 {f fW \•P YOr✓fDMYwllCr.in M:n (.c /a3a l/ ;mg (70.1•• f/f(M1taW 441.• rr 111 .42 4 0 ro * WV 0111411' t• •4•070*3 50 N • .4 400411141 12'4 •• 1.0410 n. 0 . NVW01$1111• 00l1.140121114 Pml .6 PAP 1044 0.170 0G 0.. 1.11.0 712.1 KO 1,0 • T r n w• 34..01 4314 1 64 033 a• w 4r90 •1 3411u. 0' a 0410 I 'Z 0.14.001.111 sun 22.00 lob o 11234 N•71w11'•M+ 100*. = Y .4 400.41.4..1 M1 0V1111•.•• x Ir 70 +1•113 17 1 1w 404 11YIL 4 1,1 6 V44. p'KY 0, M►'. N 1[ w1 •I Pr. 1U14 ' 13710» o .J0frtip 14, 4 O'0*1.3 4✓ 4404. V Ur 4.141* 40.2 60( r01.a 70 VC103490011144 4 *r irnfl.Dl1 W2.21r.. 101041 + 0044.1* •4 .0440 N /111•.4.1• 1 VC COMPS 1.. 17070 Nt.f 1M •0I I4* Los kolas 0 ✓a 011: f 1074 .1•I •1.11 r, 444 4 113• ET rU y 1 our s I0 0 * 11,701 ( 47/ 4 1.o) 4 • 1144' *V1I ( * .s•. • w� 6 v w.:Y 15' /70101' 1.1 ^t1 7f 40.1 *'1100* n"31*1n.Por t 1*7*II.u114o(w1uo *• Z 1011Y14;a1a14.« 1.L.•.' '741210 11W13.10.Y•7.3• • 91 4 0044. Mr4 .13 r21Y1100/.1.. W 11 0.0V 1171 • 4V Wail .0 vM 11•: 4313017 44(401144341!1 N4 wv7..4, r.4 •.al \5171 .n; {11.41 /u•S 1.014 11 4, $OfJII..:V 00.4 41 \Oat 4331 *3.404 01x477 3.7170 V 11 /IAA l*UlOor 1/ 044414 701.4000• • 4 4' .i+VP Ox 0eY w1111.•0 100 4710. 14 OM . b 40 Tv". aY 1 •'11:400130. M. • •Nu • 0 no 1(•4.,... 0• 11 04144 .0.t. 44 .. od•3100. 44 ••• Mal (4470 4 4 0-415 104.4 )1 Y40LO N 0,3 W 1.0 1306369 04443 0 rat co r• \l mW 41X1 :44 4' 74 .7 lean 30110 4. 001.0 t'a1.t04 Cora ♦1t* 27.C.170 54:.112{•0 141..0. P Sat 0�i.1 O 6PW ' of t /0041 0417 my:p11' 10 21 3 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULES 1 2 '.T 0/3/71 142829 ■ OI %Illl•l1011 1 1/2101 73$11 :Aa 0..113 .U� 70'.414 4111 ( PE11•ACI.t In '4115701 AY. C•IT 11(1.00x( u. ` 33 11111 Maximize Comm „ Group, Inc. �1:UiA Ci ■:39: .4* (9413) /90 1110 0013) W. <ILI 1 11:: , 0001r11 Alf. 1 :1:40 ?'C' 511G 04311 k A 00L*u. If MECWC h{iPo ?i MIN ru21111tl0 Sill *I *711•• Tr• *CLIA 10 311507 r LfrfT T/40 (1`.11:!PA. P:UI S K E .G"■i 9, J ,/ FlaxWavaa Prism /KM 01191. Wye*., Can•1r Aa( raFa'.y FlexWava Prism Do t% O.1 &.. 0(1.1ess CM..9• nb C.Eawy SoNDINAlbns w w•1 Y •n r w bymirs a.AA,.rw...1011.» p •∎∎∎• N . FM..IhYAPlY.11 MM •wti. MM •._+.•err.a • • ` r •r•r Man ••••,• rri•• ti i BMW* U■Y, ...Om. UPI who . who ••'T ••••••••.,...1.11r IVA b..Sxr, wwss•.rslr.ws kW/ wt..... /• s••'Y. ...V ... 0.. MOOR. O•r• FW fe.aw•w NIw w • ••Rr•.{..H.. OU pe.••■••• wrnr•yrr M.+.n w.0•r••.Avon... a•a,•M1 n•6 or I•r,e•w•••■.>•wr lew... O•w••rr rent MMMYM•eW KQTNIISI SCALA DIVISION n.w n r •w.. • w n..•a w iw o.n w y in sir K17THREIO SCALA DIVISION •rr.. e.. •�vJS•. rY n•Irtemr. FLEX WAVE PRISM 1 3 KATHREIN ANTENNA 840 -10525 PDAkir ry 940 10925 K•' Dv+b.rr) 0e•wk �Wr+n NW.. 08,..• NN... 213 • rr.w :E'r UT aole •ww. 4•Y.. • +I• wM ., n•n. ••. IW.- .-- .wv�W�s ir.w..+.w...•.. RrY11BWy 94016946 65' DY.Aaod ry IANwta iYI•a nn-D9 r U Ir{•,r• n M•1 • ur n r•Y •w.l ■W Ym •1..ISn• ••,..IS. S.w 1., ar• n ••■•b,YM. o- ,.r4 b r•Y•WM �r1 Ii+i .1 .7 rw r• rr.•.• KATHIIEIO SCALA DIVISION r r 1 • . r�A[ A �,� +� e~..ri�K4r• maw owl V . w • ••■■ 11,r66.w• 0116.1. 111.46$.• 111.110410. w KUTHRE11i SCALA DIVISION 11•• •2• • • o»re • A•kl Y.1.066661 000102/0 06' Trl 0.c00r AA >:.v L_ 660 10270 2 KATHREIN ANTENNA 800 -10270 1 1 I TM — ` C0 .00011 Sl it(() .1001 2 011 (CI KWIC, 00 142829 0(0 1/22/11 0/2/01 1 0(112• 0(0(0(003 2 00 9 GIir •,/r•ero Irr 6 1 Maximize Comm. �ti Group, Inc. it11A.l::e S� _ . 011/ 100 corp CA 97081 C r0:Cs: (909) 766 -7,70 FAX: (909) 997 -3•. •J ■00 0001(0 020. 03111E 200 SIA'Tir, WA 98100 ere, Cf,, 1M-26 NAME A AOWiL55. 1 J £LUIcU0 NETWORK NODE 26 . , 1 9 1 6 DMus ID' MO D I 179 006 IELCCULA CA 92592 1151 11111. MAN xeurMGri LY .(l ., 4 . 2 i . r PHOTOSIIvi A` s. VICINITY MAP A , vi, . . we, kg* jpt, _ , _ 1 i ir et p r E' . /' 1 •/ f r % q 3 aT SITE PHOTO VIEW 1 EW 2 7 TM -26 � .1•: 111/1 c000RETI 5TRE14 _e06 P0.1 c(I (Nora u) 142829 OCSCN.PTrtW 1705.1. (1WR7041 Pr) (1? 411 arc. 1 Maxlmlze Comm. � Group, Inc. 13Si PONCN9 ROW 5011E 100 CORONA c. 920411 Or(ICL (009) 786 -2126 f4t. ( 009) 902 - 21 3 C: • NP 1 100 (5x1(6 A1r1. wnn 250 5(0IL6. rM 06109 •■ (p016u511l, (Um TM -26 :01 1444: A A000m: I Mall A Nflrl'O (hOC( 28 vu9)(0 , 100 . YR1041ua6eoaur 118ECUA U 02592 IEI ES .. TO 5111:1110105 4.719r .11C0411 I 4 AM P C EN S 141 NV4AFIR 1 2 „, 6.) Ufitot rw'r .`1”, — ..67 '*4 1. Ll.1141J1L4*IU 0 56..4 & r644(( 16, 7,0 "4.r rw. 641.; ;1;".,!11'1 v"" Ary, 0'4" • Ox. • 1.4 Know whet; below. Callbororo you dig. SITE PLAN (1 TM-26 C) t 463407*007 Fcceser, —E_NLARGER SITE PLAI = Q0411 (1'61 A 014319 . 21r.311 . • r I tf-I 2 NO,' 1- TM-26 7 4 1 0 1/ DAV 142829 CRS '-', - ■—•,,„ „, [ /1A Maximize Comn wii Group. Inc, '041 nog) ontslon rif? “1“ 4,6 0440 " " (WM 006-2:16 (9921 V92-3113 —,911.1.11■00101.■••■104.0 n• C C R A9Yr? 1 t.• lc NC, — 26 F.11 HNC ADDRESS: 2} C NOTICE • • ""••••• N ORTHEAST ELEVATION 46 n, te e9 $!!!*.i‘.W.A91. #9 s CONCRtli. ffiUI Klfl PM( Aiwa Own VIVO — • - ---VCX.-•Xt4b "'c"IllItif 4 uMe tat,y, IMI1 •001 i rnonn nnn c.s.n., on:al NORTHWEST ELEVATION CONCRETC SIRECT 11G, 004$ o r( 1 1,t1../.11 161,• 1 *ars Ice e tialm. 11J 001:0 116 V.I LCOS ' 0 r,vIsaur ".salik7;1131 Wog ma -• -“ • 0 FM-111 1 TM71,.? CO MAC m 142829 V2U 6/3/1$ bISLII lic■itilt% RL,0KM431: pe, [ ... xmz M ll • Group, lIme C °mm. 04 let ,aifp.A. Cit 37411: .74C44: NCO 745-2)71. f93)) 717 71.3 IvA +.4 7 to.o-oello 7•, EM 26 Xi NAM* 4 ADD47475, T■111C1J, :411411/K :CV 26 LIAJ la 0 Ucti‘tu IIVD.4 INUEl.n0anC , 4Ci0 Cs. 1 lila 1./AllOts6 I:C.V.!) 40. A2 NNOTKE LA `2 3333. 32 CQC*ETC SSRTfl I.N:M: M1tr SOUTHWEST ELEVATION Ivl .333.333 333 3333. . •.N... _M.33 • . 1330.4 •Mn 13.1400331 PMKO .O• 3.3 'WYK .0 Win 3.39 V: WW1 (0.13 3'30 _ .44'93 WO 1-iE!!N 2 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION ATM -26 � I L 1 i CCI PNO92C' •IJ 142829 I•lu.c ••clr..r.rn RI � 1 Maximize Comm � Group, Inc. •35` *010.733.4 433.43 `30 COR7134 CA 97N117 C373CT (9!`l) 706 1170 - .tl. (953) 777 -.1115 i OT NTT; Avi Slu3t n ""111 Ml 90 • <r:..1 :..•:4 tort• ..1. TM 7E • r:.34 • AgONTSV. 64LUA't NM it 133233033333139(134.993 ... I!M•.CUTA CA 31%510 (- ill 11111; ■ •IV: k3ICCNTn *3 *4310 A! lM . • �1' //MLR A3 2 11511111 COCA :11 CJ A.• : t '115 coemg L I 1.:041 (a Nezr . tax rows. Ku IFNI?, OMNI 0'1 1 0:7TrO. P r i U.24 "U le' 1. 10.1 W. CI O. DOW moms WY ITI 11D MONA OWN I Itr Tx r =rota 103 DATA TABLE ADAM Mal NAM RAC MOW 0/ W. 111Wr POMBA ARO IDX OF WA WC 0990 A CCM W. UAL 1O09 CO AWAY WA =MN 001•1•10t PIRO NW Of ID AAA 551 OCIOWto AA moo 4109 ~weans WO UN Pie MIN Or PM 1001. WAD 3A1 OA lOOLDI DA OD ANL ROAD AW1 WO LW MAAR OA DAM WO INA WA PAO N/A CALONCI ONNICOA OA Wit W OGNINAINI1 OMAN 0112 MA MU PAIA How a Wow ovAlun mo 44 omwoort tWINS MOM MAW SW-V/ MANCII *CND I 105 SHEET INDEX ma MOWN' TI Thu ear T2 coma oars mamma T3 ~gam mamas P1 OR PAW Al ow NW A2 OMANI A3 ROAM R 711 treill 1 lie ii e s alik PROJECT OESCRIPTION V CROWN CASTLE TM-28 NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE NORTH SIDE OF LEENA WY. CENTERLI-NE OF LUCCA WY. 1ZZ. ct L.:4 cri-ct-is F; TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPLICANT ma teMA woo moo Wh■ rIA01 NNW 045 53-510 JURISDICTION o gouts* NAM COMANCATot MeV. IC. Int RNA* AM 103 091510 16=2 6015056 NNW DA-433-05.1 1W-W2-513 COORDINATES ur: 31.4wm -117.0161 CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS WM MOW% 1.WOR WW3 nom Cm) na mac 011) Ns °MD MW DO-CON CODOWCYCO WAWA NM 11650 555 0 54-1431 MO MONODIC* aigur MAO (A) 15,1302 ENGINEERING FIRWSURVEYING cope COMPLIANCE: PAL MK NO MAMMA 615.1.51 0060 • 11C CONON 0311010 114 NODO rf WAAL 6011311041) 100065 *40 11051051091540 DOOM 1. AN COMOWA =ACK COM WOW MAK MAI A 510 51 • UN VICINITY MAP 000(041E 5)$111 43811 P44E Ca PROJECT NO. SCA-007 REY. 2 3814 1/13/11 9/16/11 DM/61MM OW 'rnroZr 644.140 POW CURRENT tSSUE OATE: FTAXS PREPAREO OT: [ Max 1 m ize Comm. 1W.0 Group, inc. P0110110 6038 SURE 100 CORONA. CA 02162 01 (000) 7811-2170 FAX: MO 002-3113 MOM: ,9s)ccgA 1100 DEXTER AYE. WIT 2$0 SEATO.E. WA 06100 Inne.ormnoatIAawn 5ITE 110.1 TM-28 STE NM I E k ADORMW DEED NEVORK NODE 28 owl= Winlit.MANNA313 TENEWLA 40 92892 (SHEET ME: 'arm 5 WO f Awf9MWA M CMLE 6CIIA10. E 41110 M• /�i•l OM OW We M M a M O 110 713 / 1/1• O RIR o MM W 1•13 01 2 T/1 0111 N• NO 1001 1Y'• 2 Ir1 Illim015MMaal•lonaa>_•0a•0M CEO WOW NaDDP. ■71110 rat MI.MU W Ma ale. OM. - '000010410 110 Q -� 1100 UM 60- MP Re - _ _ - *We 0100* 0 010•111. 100410 9- SOMA OMRMI _. - -1 -- -- 01:00741 0104 - MAX - OWL LOX --- ___-- 12 01 . N*20041100* - BIBIfi• -1- 011* MO 010* LEGEND 14 MILO L moos M areA113x.. 0..11Mz,1.0•a O 1/lO01179100 N (OIfl* IM MOW M~ 11OM R • 200 Al moat a<maww A n 10 exam f T ...marl *01100114.010 •M ONO T O.00001a®00101/, • MOOR ea IT n04 min 714 1 w0Ow00 071022 02* A0T110000Ya■■..MOM 17000 leer OI. OO M ,011 0•0 20 OQ •%wt101 1 #@910 004 1M 00011 1 Osseo ea • 00MMl ow M TO 141115 LOW, 4 Tel au 4 lee /R O.ell Oiw MOO lee NI COOP 111*NU. MOO • MA ONO oat M•n sal alarm • 070•00 Mrs. OW Al 0•1 OR WAOMR OUR I OI ID CM O0 00 IL 4 MOP 0•u• SRO Ow DOLL T. NOM Ml/ WOW AT MO OM P O [ale 1100 00• KAM Merl 15 00•0• 111110{ al A2M•f 00• M MR ma�IlvuM k1. Oss =MY M K 00•.00 O M COPT 1100 Of 10 101000•1 MOO Meal 0•07 0100 OS p � i at a mon to 0• G OO K ~AM 01110 41000 Id 11 110•4411 0•l An Ml 0WO tar•ne ROMO0le COY M A M1t111111 RN 01•71 00 0010414. WM O 010110• I* • K wO = t 0 11 M0•000•440/COP •107 10 how MM l wan Y7 N. 1 • MOO. W I L L MOLL A I•AS•10•1 YEW TO 11 WIC 011 100010 imr• 0•0•0•1901 • aR OMf4 WIG 019 201 M MOM 0W1 TOR • w 0 MOGI 0•0017.01 WSW. Ma 0 e /,y, 0400•0 M • e. r OMO r La Mee 01 � KM/ 04.01 41111 V O M Yl .0 r Y d lillPf� T11aw1 0 100 I we. 010 004 of b NOW 11011.201. Kee ell K MOW. Co 1000 M• ammo 00•111 Heise r MI00 A w0a0N K Ow MS NM .r 0104 MN 100 14904 IOWA VMS. 00. 0•t P Re • Me* Otiveme woo 1010 0 31 WUY 11 IOM's 0 mass Iw aaao •■•••• OIIMRIT 100 WIC K OMI 1177 D Na 1R 0.1•1•70 0•¢01.7 • 0100 DOOM 0 oV4 0p*442* I y 4 00 mania* WON %a i i11M WA Al M U ille IM 0111 y 10 04 t / i OSAKA MM 32100 K MO01 a re h Tie Me= Ml00001101 eal MO TM oleo* en O0•l 00011 Mf15 040ee Mao • 00 IM 1 0011 MI MO • IMAM O ILL Ma quote 102 01 4 0041 so 0 IO Mete M M MOWN 191 100• MOs M KwMnt fat AO iirei es. w Tor foss mokle • NT 111000101 R a• OOO11y0111001 111 0•0 0 K OOMtr 0 11 031M00 0IOW M MM O 0700 2044 OW Cens a memo x 0010 ft WOOS 000. 0••00 M M, (MP TO 00 IMO MR 11120 •0l ■ 0•1112211000RrM OM ter TOI MAY after PM Ms and Hales ale RAW M MOOR Ora 2011M Nemo Le mews I1 20 O •W K A• 01401 2 YdM�al Ole Y M•a a M ®ar RO KU OO a AL Roe M 1001 M 1011000001 Mn 0111Mu ma d• WM•OW MO M MOOR K 071■017 WET MM M 112170 000 Jo 70 Cal IMllal oH®oin MO MOM 011 0 TM 10 MO 4 Viet R w esa • 020.21•11 x mama ax ea 0 as min l 110 •00.00 . MAMf a 01• • Mite OAR M •0•1 VA/ Mee OM PUMMA MOM WO M MY 10 11010100 m M Mee ORR 1 Al =101.1. MM • 01151.01 0 MO 'MOM R NM 00 ®Oa'• OR0 R YOI. Oaf O/R AI 1110111 MOO IIO 1080 W M•MMaa0 M IR 0•0M II= RICAN lMeuf. Off 0 e 00 0_ M• 1 17 00191 00 00 AU DIM O O• a 0• AMOK ORIO D Me Nat • 120 MOM On OOIw10� gpN14 :if MR a,OC Sale IMO e 0007078 s>� v �� 0 1711: MI Or OR= MOM Nee 0 M• e0•. OOfOR 1Ia wan 01 SW= RES 0x/1111115 M MMe0 Plea 7 eXTpMMORO&031010 Val 1100.0 OM•lIOO• K410•0•0•0• N M 41..41 i eret tt Sian TO IMO • R 4 OW OO1J SS NMI S K • M M Tq• MO MOM MI O STAMM Y a0• aY OR 1111101 Mewl M AL 11•1•1 MO . O IM M• M 1011 a =MO sale SUS Of O OS Su • MOO WO See ••10 OM Y 14111010 ONO M10ML L x0010w01`1OR[MK0O1/ At MX. TOO MO TM 0 00 O 0O Mw MUM IOW OOM 11111111111011 M dal OM OMOalI II at Oaf Me NO 007 MK M 201407713 0111•00 P 1110•0100111111001 01 41 10• i 1M R R Y x 1° OI ` il1M 43171 aew 1 nv e a�M 1 M M TA " lent tl YMOM SILL IMI Ot KM /LL PPR UM • reef MS MILS 3111 Ore XI MO" Le M MT% 150•110•1 M ROOM mom MOM N 07•1111 ML O S 000 TO MDR COW MO 70•e MO• 110•0 1 RI/M00no. 101110000•aWO110011.4 M 11002 42041 moo a• 100201• NO MO 0/501100•0 O M MOO Tem. 120 04 • iMML• Wee AR M0 Wee= 4111 MLR SOLI W0 A SS alO OS TN ONO MOSM0110•AHMO PAL TOIL MIX 1- 000.227-2000 • LYN2 SIOUILOOILRIOROS x il •R•YI0 MOO ISOM m /IM MOM 1•t•I000 L AL O OM OS 10n••9M1M, Mee VI YO • Meal •lit M O•M•••• OWN! MK 010••000 Mee ▪ OA RS x111 UM GP11R R OT OM. OR MO MU MO SA MM AR MOOS 1••••71.11111M Se*1•i • RJ RMAMM• OMI *0711190 4101 2020 0100 0O Mil gwrani Y d ial $10411111111111117111 •0.0 w 0.41 l 117 OiMOCO 01000•1111001111L Ra 00.1.11500 M000 OMmW 15 a R MO Oa A 000•0•1. 11t00.OR O OOO OIL t MOJ•0 I* O 0• Y 00 ND MO S LIMO. • e 0e MY SOX M M 0•.O 00000114 1 01111 O N E VOW HO w* 010• 1J Al p11 S � eM SK Ad RI OM MOO NU • Mae S el . 101OOs 0 20 MO 07110100. 10.00111 0•00 111171 SOS Mel OS 10021100 a 0 o 41 7 9 10 02101 a1i K 241 10 OR Me OR MAUI �15�AM•M0O•� • ,0•01fat IL 111 11111170111101 1741 N0 MOO OM MOIL • 920 NM AL Oe n 11000100•0 Ml NM 10 I O* 1. p 00 ION* 1S. IM Opt M M IOO 1m 0010M 0010 x 00 P K 410 111 Mee ». M IMMt MOMd SOS •RL•11RO•Y M M 0110 SO O I ONO 0 IR Meal ISA W R TOO 000• OMO0 0 .15 0• 1111111111 Mee a IMO Ole ON TOO 1MWSOI OMR 10•0 * Olt 0317111111 MM MOM R• WRY Ong 20 OM if M OR M RI P 0111100201120110•410 OR 110411•fa NMI Cf OdM00 0101.110 x OMR • x 11010•11•1010 20 PO[M MO M XOO6 GENERAL NOTES 2 Im 11.7907.11 11 15110•/11111Ml MR MArwn1 01101042* If MI . al O•w1E0 ML It w KO•MO 1.11 IMO.R Ml1n, nlOw. OM NO O,0 MOM NO SWATOM 1 cal 04M 1010 TIN no more 0•(2¢0•00.11000141 0 • ,94107 * 0 20111 Werel 0 NM w M Meet n •0410. • ,CO9O bawl Ma00 x 0•010'0 0 MO 01017 I. 0112 •••1 W0 0 TAM 1. • Ta ROO 00000.10, g 10 1111 =CM 1 • MAUI 4111 l Y 0 40• CCT 1. J 201 WW1 0 O V 001. K9 1.Oa1rLLS A. • 0 11 1110110 Y /J• ?Oral 0•0•1410•. 00 OO. WNW ~AL 0Y g10 wMVNM. 1 01 WON 14 IMR Mum NO WORD MN 1/N 1 1 21 00. 00014•d••• 1. sees M mom eel e OMOM. 1 Oa 0,0141 woe ,• OOA DIMS IM Y 00 0 ,o Re see 0 . ARM Al 11110•0 NO 07 w r M0 NO *PI 00.10 1011 ■DMA ORO0 010•• ®a MINIM Mx sellwoa 1Ofife Ole • MOM a 10 M Wee 15 M0 MO AM M 1010 U. 14m OO.OSaRS MM LW O MOM aR 1100 0177OL lea O M OM O IM• • NOT 00010 00•415 in 00 McM20LMLyMR OM We AMMO 1111 rOlVrA 06•ML`M01 D120 VOL -MOT MO a OIM!Ma eR • M NOR 0•0 WOO 141•00 WI If 4140 MA0 111 A 01 IOW Me 000•11 Ml •OK AU MOO 000. WM \.ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES ki i M 101 eO0MOPMfL MOO WM • W 0•1 O MR •• CUM •OOOff 1011 OO. OD' 111 101.1111 11 •VCpS te P IOW O IMM 9• 1M40S 100100 OYU to MO RIO Y OW= MS O M OM eel a or AMR Y. Me 001111000 * CIMO 0001010 TOM/ 4. IL LW MAX PSI 0 MOM4 OLIO 0•10•1111 a 19*. Se 1•,+e Ole .. OOP 170•0•0• OM TOW DAM, O MOT OR MOOR OLIO 20 • TOM LIMin ,O •M10 w. Me 1 1 (ONES, 110 Se•MS O. 00 if A ••• 130.10•11 IM{ARV � 11• • M MOM IOOM K IR MO PM IS PM MINIS 11101. ONO M 4100• 1 0* r 00 M 41015• MO 00.20 M M eV effe ff t owns isms) rid N••0 M0• O 00•0110* Mal Ma M10 sir MaitaatAlalmeOtosso I3 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULES1 1} "TM -28� 0(`04114 gtin 1.0,11 4041 CC' PRO.11 NC. SCA-007 2 DATE 1/13/11 2/10/11 DESC.Pf10N 20 maw. Iol art M0001aot 12,11E0 1011. J PUNS PREPARED BY /( Maximize Conwn, • j� Group, Inc. 1331 POYON0 ROAD SRC 100 CO5113I40 CA 92862 OFF/Cf. • (909) 736 -2170 FAX: (900) 992-3113 CLIEM: 1100 00010 4 AYE. 50111 250 SEA WA 90109 n•D0K.c0Tn J _ 440.: TM -28 SRI NAME M 0ORESS: TEHECIRA NM( NODE 28 .071022017.010100 TEMECULA CA 02302 21lt1.3 11710 Cei 1.'P! NOTES & 5O 5 la FilNWave Prism 1 Parole Oadaol W:ekan mange r.d Cpac,1 Vadaewl I w Neonate UM, W 1 dd. P 4 v....v.Aa O n , W.eeryc..rb W W.. marl.•. al..•(u w M..D.1 me I POW W w.Nr'w.,• .I VADWIN•1 Wag. 'M MY guatrreoure l au. P vn gala M•r...•.Iww. Y. w.w... J,4M e.taw bn lM l y V r.r.w.• I . ai /MOIW Y. IOM{a.I . . WM bkeeeew al.-.r. £n.appN� MYD..*wbYi.,.. n,,u. •r i ,n Ul. ▪ Fia*Wavo' Prism TIDe6k Ooldoo, Nve4ss Conwaq. and (panty •1 ,t•hulaon � .arr M Ubay. Mo. Were Owerr .•.w .r. Wm.* &w.• e yw ewwww. War Mal imager wwu Ogre Mgr .- (r alnwn /.1 EFIBBIE --4 A/It•1~04 =••tea..• VONO■ /mom Da /ea MY .- r•w.r. ..w.y rage ruar e. FLEX WAVE PRISM KUTHREUR PId.Nroy SW 10020 SCALA DIVISION W1/M9DW ONC ypWANDN aw • n da•Nwi Y W U V mo , �v YMI1C � ro /iwa u U . ' wl w,.�, yaW :.b« ro..Y\ n. 27.VI rr. • wwleapw. . rww.•.I.M.w..,..•. • bAe •rwa.11.er. •++ aa. tan.. raz mQe.M.•at•.rwa Iw•na.••'.1 •7w11101• IY M t7- 1 1•• •r�9:•a b+c�eu ;s�rx e `.• • r 2410 ut ../4 i • rw ar•r e•Pa.r, wM..e .1 .••._M a•f+wa d. ad me- + . µ •,.= 1. 4r ... + a.w...bw.vww...wn.u....,•r. 5 my. iN1Y...11•a..14... yYMr. W` M. rr.wMwarrra W`•r wr [•., oa«wou..M..�n .Ht•= 0.177..... Lef0.2 - Me. m, Al.rkeeru agra• W 7.4141 WO.elk..•e, W 0I •owi Wtr.s.., ,.I..r r. Y.I... «w•n.. ••wluw.". KRTHHEI11 SCALA DIVISION e w' urn. voiw. � arr•r�••.r..•rtr• +•a. owr•w•e.wru war w Inerelegreg Y arwr..a..••waer 1aba v.,a•e Y.a WY* M ' Yrvluw ;� Yl �Yw Nn b.M war. .•v •« we 'Ter ww ya 1 1 , ✓. ws �•Mw rtee4Nt• el,w. •w. . l .Tw " .. e..rar. «aev . w .ww ` .:w•.. .: r«., wrl..... n anwY l or rw Mw. v. w .w..e •.• Nu. b. SWI M M. .wr. :71.= 4 rw r M PAariry ._ Ir r 4 ▪ j 0o^.. rJ•.w•rH .. M D ,•4..Y. Y r " er•w,r lwa lasew 1.. co 00,01 II IS .us tea a•r�w 4 P 'aarrF,.a•w..rv.ew Ir Mn u.n. • • ✓li • 000 10270 ES' in. MC TO! arms. 01.17.7. •....•I•d.. w•ra••aa ga•wrrww.r «7.Y4rw W r ..• - ar.rr few.. w.r w•.w.. egg wr ...WO ran 3 KATHREIN ANTENNA 840.10525 [ 2 KATHRIEN ANTENNA 800.10270 1} TM -28 EDNCRE7[ SNI000 U7N1 PETE Ca PNOIECT 191. $CA -007 I 2 OAIE 1/13/11 5/10/11 °ESCRIv200 Nr rYQI�OTY ISSUED 1ON. CURRENT 1506k DAIL: PW +S PREPARED SY; 6 1 Maximize Comm. �j Group, Inc. 1 361 POMONA ROAD S URE 100 C ORONA, CA 92002 0 E110E: (900) 766 -2170 FAX: (609) 992 -5113 ..w. br...w •■r....r CI11NI: [ 8YI 100 DOEILR AVE S1AT 230 EATRE. WA 69109 .r.alwneorllreem E .: TM -28 ME a ADDRESS: CDIA NETWORK NODE 28 0. r ROO1D.mw TEMECIAA CA 92092 C SKIT 1111L lat u-n . TgaNCAf! l YM BY: 06E0000 BY: 4997E0 Im PC Ai KU S NFLT NUUOER: T3 R7.k40N: 2� PHOTOSIM IOINITY MAP SITE PHOTO - VIEW 2 Lft 3 SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 ATM -28 cot It )110IT UPO 00LL ca PRO3LT Na 8CA -007 1 RV. CAI 1/13/11 0/10/11 OESOO1POON J PANS P000A41E0 0Y: • � � Maximize Comm. j� Group, Inc 1.101 POMONA ROAD MC 100 COR01M CA 02002 000100 (009) 700 -2170 FAX: (000) 002 -3113 tt K11f: 1100 0EX1E8 AWL SU11 200 SEATTLE. WA 00109 Inn.aoentaMY.oan / SITE NO.: TM -28 50E NAME • ADORES: 1EIOECUTA CA 02002 (WEI 1111E: I05 1 8Y: 'NECKED 9f: PC AT S1 NO P1 fi tinergO LOGNOM OF 1.1100101OU0 unurf Mu at =rung= oi lac rum KO War In 10101110) 19.0140.0.144.9011 I SW NM 011 TWA AV OWL 00WOVCION SHAL WI PIA.CATOOVIY 11l50.O3 30 POMO! AL ORM UM WILCO* Mfg WI MOW OR MX OW MOOD SY GLIM* COMM 4 ■CUtl WOK 05.0(11110. COWAACION SOIL COM MO KO Mt 01010 0*) AL 00740 alma oaalwanal UAL \,SITE PLAN ImAlt 40* 10 0411.61 .A 3- 1/ off , s N4. • • • TM-28 4 aairigC Cool wow we 1 , *%1,1• • ire ENLARGED SITE PLAN of Ito, 8 cth,„„v Woe OM MO IOW COO. TOR NUL MAY =CH 0010110* 00010 WWI 14XL NORTH WM:FM $O ME Oa PROJECT NM 8CA-007 OATE 1/13/11 5/16/11 DESCRIPTION OOP afitaCt OCR CoRRENI MOUE MOE: PINS 00005050 um .. /Ii . ; Maximize Comm. Wr.9 Group, Inc. 1331 POMONA ROAD 0005 000 CORONA, CA 02982 OFFICO. WO 780-3170 MO (000) 002-3113 ...v....•■••.......—....•••• MT 1100 CCOER AVE SUIT 250 scunz 004 0010* ‘... ewa.erormonticaam rETTE TM-28 NAME k ACORES& ITEULA IETION OE 28 RV QM V NM Pt TEM ECULA GO 02392 f50000 11150o AN RA sam PC IIw 49117.11)) MOON: too A 1 2 Fa»1 ,x'4nesar i RRiI�•�• �• �� WEST ELEVATION " . 12 SOUTH ELEVATION (TM-28 80A-007 DATE 1/13/11 0 /16/11 6FSCASP ION rrr 101101 tts CM tnmoml PUNS PREPARED 0'h. 6 �1 Maximize Comm. •j Group, Inc. 1 351 P0N0NA ROAD SUM Nti 100 C ORO CA 62832 O FFICE: 806 796 -2170 Mt: (602) 662 - 3113 ...t._..— ._... CUD/1: f 9 CCASy /E 1100 IIXIER AVE. 0JT 230 SEATTLE. WA 93106 sln.cmfl*I2*com 511E NO.: TM -28 311E NNFE • A00RESS: 1EMECUU IIET O1K MODE 28 ...tam anima • saw 1EYIECIIIA CA 92562 ( SHEET WILE: i- f;VAI1ON5 SHEET NNNIER, A2 REYK�Mt: 2. , rN 8T: CNECIEO 00: 06040 BF. PC Al 1W V NORTH ELEVATION TM -28 C Cl0R STRUT UPtt PQ4 CCI P00 T N0. 8CA-007 REV. 2 Dirt 1/13/11 9/10/11 DESCR MON sue 00 ,s Ott ISSUCO FOR CURRENT ISSUE PANS PREPARIO er 6 / �� Maximize Comm. � .9 Group. Inc. 1381 PCMONA ROAD V= 100 CORONA CA 02882 O F1:1m (000) 788 -2170 0 001 (000) 002 -3113 em...... arr. em. .. CAJomm; OATS: 00 OE AVE. MIT 220 m WE N0. TM -28 UM NAVE 4 MOMS: 18IECUU KW N&i€ 28 1E31ECUIA CA 02802 (SUM TOLE ei.:'Jit11.'1;V5 N 8 BT; PC AF 91001 1111 A3 n CROWN v cASTLE TM -32 NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE SOUTH SIDE OF NICOLAS RD. 620' CL EAST OF WINCHESTER RD. TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPLICANT CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS (0044 405710 41040357000. Imo glatx %AVIA A( 1 004h+1. 4,04 8001471 81944 LAWN 0144 0111 315.0041 JURISDICTION DM Of 1444[010 1 80 coo 444 r. 9 a 9x0 R » 1 (0 0 -5107 (9511 014 -0441 ENGINEERING FIRMISURVEYING YM�IN2 p 2CVMNC•101 NJ24, 00 5181 100 cD+ .OI' 1 e11c OM. 574 r'u o :i U a>5 C 5 (04 05,1064 ((0: - 414.44 1400CI MYVC(k (4 440940( 6174 .tww01 100141 10YOD 1`•40115 0041 042.4400 01C•1 (410) 741 -421 04 1hGwuR: CAR7:W OCpM Ian ()OI. -0110 0041504050 4.44 o 410[4 C00.4 I ,i 0 517 04 04[ (6 051 70 -410] CODE COMPLIANCE: - u0, 1 040414 -4 W N P14PO4K0 4 «414«0 w 01[0010[[ 001 I9 or [0101(40 C MIp0 04 044 a1D100 7174 / K 0 T49 700 O4Ll4, W 4 04•.2x8 us 10c4 /unrcoM'Ir o444A4e I .0011.104344 05C 000, 104t • 4040140 000.04. Ut4 M 4001 N • 444 140 1.45001 C0166110! 0000 (1) 460 34 -4 04414440 0000 µ044040 YOU 14400 YMCA (44; , 114.11 40 •0,04 M 1011006 •••1 11111.400 00100 451 010 4...0004440 (044(04 a IMC(0 Cg061 11.00 : 011 81 (0004100 1•0 100 10C 44 D; M 00011 00114•1 C ( l4 4.4. 407 2, $3 4. NMI 401001 (. V A TV: 4.i. r a .0414714 44 (1 04431' IMO IR= 0111 HAM MUM. 11(1[1 .0•01t1 Weal arrt■ n 4104444 10010.00824 COON IW 014(000. CW143 1•0* 011,0001050 MO 44. Mal 0014'MP 1010 411 MICA 1044 ■••0 AICA 427 6000.0 •Amu 110.0 MCA 440 O010MP (N/1KAVA 1441 CO MaIUI0400 0 8, 0R . . M A4r 4w •1401) n 1 4CMV 4n4hw .4a 4,4 JI4e2 4,121. S(0 M0.11.? T1 0441 01 1 T2 «40* 0004 MOlanai PROJECT DESCRIPTION DATA TABLE 44..1 00,1 s 001 40414 (M 0 Wu. M. 44 4' 401 0 01410141. 401 0044( 000 Of 005 *06 Mae 60. ft N/A NA Y RA 1(/A 4VA Malt WI 10'6 4414 4/4 AOWM 510(TA( 0n• -0'/ 40(0414■ (0.' 1 4. wi SHEET INDEX RE 3 ()Alf 3/40/10 .3/16/40 4/34/11 6/3/11 ORM 31) (94441 SP RR.V15'034 PER 4045 RE46CA1*)4 OESCR1306 C V.P 0416005 FOR 614644 R-V.EW J 1. 00441 ':0R9E4t :5501 0010 11,045 ('+4411 1.711 0. � Maximize Comm. j� Group, Inc. ` 351 17060 6 R0. 50(41 (00 CORON.\ CA 92882 OSE4C: (903) 185.2740 F AX. (909) 952 -3113 CuOM1 TM-32� LcohchtlE 510:01E00 0750 CO PROI(CI (0, 142829 4580E alt I MO 0E %IER AVE 38:40 250 SEATP.E, WA 96409 5111 N0. TM -32 411E RARE Eh AC011(9S. TEMECULA REIWORK NICE 37 1410000A0CC0 10 0 0014 1EVEC0A CA 92592 ((1 17 1L 5 e.11N DY: NE0(EO BY Ar T1 J J /KKKNA• CAKESCO4UU*E Max 41T 111 111/ 464( tr / .10 o 044 ' 01 M P trt M. or- r 1 1/r 1� 110 . 2.1 u '• 1 •/Y 1:011 !1. Mt aloll. )1 - 4' ! In" I6ar404••0 •••. Ma •••••••• lww••••••••• WO A• OE00A II CABL E SCHEDI 11E M Atm UM MAX tr / 4 •"•i OM ' 01 foo Gia or- r a I/r •v la f - -1 - Wo•'v CPL. -- -• :per. - COIN -'twat w1/ •.K /0 -- [•CK'.V {4,[A J•w 14 .(..AL LEGEND 14 I •4 (.1.410 W •11.9.01.1 Ip 10•01 04•11 •11.141 t0* C01L 00•••• Ra 1 P. atal P :0 1a110, J 140 1M1t1Pa•1ltSS0l, KKK AUK. 000001,10014.L.0 0 • 104Daw Kwa.w 19 •0 1114101 • 1E0•1• Yb OWNS M. 1 0*4*1011PII/ 0104•110 *SKY,* [ 40•0 4401 11i• • Wilt • 0111• Iw: • WS N 10b0N r I[ •C104 t•4u100011 VtWal tat • 1t (1440.0 coo 01 • 4.14, 00.IYM way 190 .1 *0 O 411.110 IMO" M. a y Iyit L4 14 Lai ,u 1W1.w 4 1ta•W 0414114 '01 411 rw1Y Ma nD Pl1l01 1 EMS et 50. 0 0110.1 M 44•• 0.1 4 14144111µ115I•.01 i,t04M •1•uM11 uc•••••• n ail µ.a OM4. IV1100u101 MVO t(O H.V • 8101411 .1.4,4•M4 0101 Waal VIM. 105404001 60'010 • 1•NM4101 •. Kt • 4, i+41 (.1 101 1 1 et a 411•0•Li *PKµ *411(W CO401.601•00(w41µ WM. 4 44• ♦• ..0141 • 1!414. 0 •K alt.44■4 4 n ClRU1 war. • '4 ••■••0 111..0 nasal .4 t o n [11: • it 0.�'c 4 f4v6 :0 %wiiu y0i•vliewll.w.a 4 [1000 •014 •,t t.4:4% 4,t1•t111- yea:•YW... h r Tu[ way •••••• to• 0500•u am. rtw4 • N a.m. vial 01.P4 M !1460 aC•1 10114 a W '4 On 1;••. Lr.V • w [ ac W or v D • AMP. 30114•410l•4•0....oK•I4 Iry 111 •0100 U1••T 41 111044 04.4 . 1•• 04404( 11 M100W Vrypw 00...y110• • M• c00 001iAt•to 10 41 041 40 4 DrM` wq♦g♦ ali • •••• W 16(•1.0 ) : • W Qof•L • IOW. •• M•L r 4 0(104114le:=10•2 •L a•Mr.• • •1 1y40hg'.t �lu b IW 4• 1 0110: li'1u'`'1O ria*4 la Ii Qa4,•4 fu 00 °1 "` 110': .,a YL 1. �4•w.t 4 001!0 • 0u� [a coat 4lr• 145at n 4. 411.101 '4) 011*0:• u. ,1 .*1014 •81.0, M4�i '2 :*41(1, mn_u 1010•: T11111 i•'A VK" fN .101**112l� yliO lrwesl•1 r0 4 •o1 1 r(1 111 010 411 tµ;4 1 E V fw K N 'rh 411 4t*1'/ 011.1 W cry<.131614 14 1 C. MMa •N^ 1140•.( ttw :J0'wnyu 1yc v µ!1. r � 14wV: 40r� 5. 1.1 05.11 091 A 14 a M<Or• MO 1 5 aft .101.0 •1454 401 }44.4:.1 :10.10 S.MR�v .K 1111'4•. 110.•041 •V+. ;4.11 1 1 4; 4 1114 .1 Ja Wfl• N4' w pay 14001144 011411 0:.4'4 101 . p. Y ,•4.410 14'4 'Ji 1.x4 1 5*w4ii 'u 10W •114.re1.4 W 141' A0 .11 10 01451 14.4 IN 4•PI.I•T � i re,• a. .4111, 0.04a 0140. • 40.101 01051! 1111. GENERAL NOTES MAMA KKK Irlt ULtL n WK mouvivo 001.14 •••12.44.1.1111s IoPiKan•11101n• •on 11 curarca OM 0> * •01 ✓aA y1 •0 .1 41 41 Oa. P 111:0[16..4 v (4 W a 1•K I.4 V MJ1 w +•ML MI 0112 NI 4400x, uki MUM, -OM.I1ATIafa.lAitra.r.riz6Lp- wOlOraSLOMiracMa- K00.4*4 (4(0 01 /100010 404141.9 a4M y 4Me1 1• llO, 0 wwl w,...,^ r 1- x - { � 1r M 1 4 � 5 11 1 = 00� 01 iN411 �0N Ve 1 Olt1 A<1M ✓+. N. /MSY OM 1(140 V!A W R 011100 Y W • hover O 0A IL Pc160 T Co MAY 1141Pa10.44'.Y.1 PO 40•11414 •T 4'01 1 IS 04 10430 s •wa ••a• 5. 0.1..00 • M WINK/ V113•1rt011R000 0 1t ntr 1.14 IP 41 •tO W N4u./Ww• WI • a •u• a 14 1410 tart t u 101 o , • m w (W4n * 1.' PnIZNR 4: da4DNw111Jr,n••0[' • Ghat P'v le ! *1 N• m]II nom MI 111 lOYlt=cm • St On WI •••• a AI • IIN*• j C • 1 .40i0µ 1141 ~ 3 r%1*t 10090). MI 4A0 P µ 1A tam 001014 " 40401 M fe 004010( 21 Mylt 1110ley 0911.41E Y3•t> VMM N IYW a•a1 M I.4 0111400 OI M. N CCN} • tYl t ab :Zit= ry 4(rFf .M•r 41,••10 • •41400[ f'�pl•A•t F11t IWYIIN HYII 01 11, 06 0 1111414 M.. 1141 if suIj IIS( J• i i'ry001! *1 140 N�A'l ('[040111 .531? YA. •q /AV it m.v•o1 055 **5 ••c••• 01W.0 Val l.w•[.•u •art.'Sb 01.4 i4 1( 1014•40 I 0411.1 CORY. DY14H!.ITV Ir /L /pf 1401* :1440 •1T 1 E+1TD:Vh:11b1:.VfI ♦♦00�1 M/�yy 11gy14 1 0 4 .. ... . r.. +0 1105 YOJ40 6.11.16 el .4.1 1406'0041 11(:40 110/111 50.1 . • • r .1 Know what's below. Call before you dig. ▪ maagr.ms C Ip p+M /0.10 4: 7414 w1 VW IL 011 M• -11404 •XL of Zr 4110•v44 044 P • 4.w ow 4 • . 4 taw ail New 114.0 4D (.1:1 07400101 fw c051•.0.I • Val 1,81410.45004014 (4044 6 111!1 011.1)0 • M IN44YaW I v K 41(404r U Y4.M 14 M 14 D^I• ik40f 0M 4•M1K'f s[AC M• 44.1006 1 tp4 PO,ro ael•IlEm•c1•¢E I22.T oft 0 0 017)07 , 1 4441 tat.* Dwi1 V 1144 w1116I• • !0 w4 u 1110 u e 2 n4 •a4ll00 t.611 w1•11r 0 �N UI•f}M4r um or put 1.0, rc •4;1 & 41 YK 044,(WW1 0 .0. 1. Sy. a. S11t� 01i�L,l6{S W 401,1 1 • 0•44.4 Y AV/ 11 1441414: a Id 40•( fin is co � 11" alw X. Caw. 4s I t Qlltiletew'1¢ IMM• Illy • :04010! 07 ▪ 10214., 4.4 Man Dtaa•an 10 mt.1•,1 01•3110 pt ap i1.Oattri•i4.1 f1" 11.2 " OWeC 00. 4uI•a1C .4 14W {N4 1 O Y C � 1 Y0•10)OIILRNY 4(n tram .fp,I roogl ..4.00 11 lit 1114110. Si. apvasIt ' 101 M1 f! K�f1Y A�161MLt 014011010 + 04I Ip KK Cal(WOKS. Mau• (Ai mu/Ng/AK w 9" 6 •*0'05( ACI14lI041 Km woof. 4001040 M 10411 41.0.01. 4• •44010104 ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES lial:01.10tltsm.wlEl1• I MI 41 Mari tiff 1 fat 1 0414X401 0 f4,- w■e 001 0 (0011 4,4A .r8 11140(0 Yi 0 0 .1 4 11"0110•K4 P[ 7.14',"1,, t 1 " 7 Yf 4l Oa (y5 h•1ra1 Q 01 fv trim d 1601.: IYJ •y t% OIWS 0.4) * 1,141 r (+a[ (131 • 0 111 .1113 G WY 411 V 445 N (V.K0:D4 lI 1x1 DP14V(( a 1.011611 • M11 t 4 • ; MU 0. 1(14.4 WOO 0 v ! 4440 4 T 4 4EW1 11 1 Wi K�piRUt 04111040 t 5� 9 0 4C14t g Met •0 0 M Rk D 461 Mall • WW1 1Ot fn . 10 PM Ma O'•1.09AW12 110 rt.S 01441111.44/0 101000!49091 40 Al 44 '. WINO. i iert. 4 �iwl • nut lr. l R • Itl 40µ'•.R 110 p1Y r(twat co ut3 tit w w•utw •1. +.145 of4v 141te O 0410, 14104m•n M1 00.11 m .. v_ • li►6[01401L 0* � YOli.l1011 Mt an wow .1l././•r fern now 40(31,0 fa 1.1416111. ■•_ a corm/ • t Vl Ms.. • 410,!160, Lt 1101 ": •A 111M4• 9 114DM sl :.DW bOa.. OK • It4l PA•;/1 •1 A• 4r 1 1.IW4MiYI 1u * 011 Qrw4 T Y >hY W 0.01 0:/. w1: Ne MR 011 • 11 0TH 0KM[ Wit N: 1!•i• 10140111NMn• W. •1•3•3 I KO 4 t'1 M1D W I d I •• roc 1)040 lS 10 lW f0 sa, 4 •60440 40)• II 0 ' 0 0 0 4100.63 4111:11[111 � 4511(•01. 9.06 VAS • It 3.1X. to WOW n}41wt• COOrtill •0111lwl• .41 4010 004) 44 M i1•.I..P 1A14 M a OXII O 4rfl 5. 4 00410 P DAM. 040 1.11 Ku A• SWIM 811 MI .1D W pO :•1111 YD[ 11101.4•••• 4o4 tit •041105 ep• was tvIet Ya 1, 504701•0 0 6404 1 10 .0 V�Y t4Y/b�*1 21= 0414490. 01•11 WW1 oil • 00Yam • v 4.40161 Ma Y 410.• 1444 ./ R1031,}11LrI 4, (i t X '? 4 WI 041 Mn• r 10,4"( •,Y PLI..4 00011 11 V 14 �41h41a404 04 R 1C*IIOT1 0004 PPL1✓. P 140'1410 • 44MCP 16, 0 11D•1K1 •0 LIM •MI 4Y414•41M14 • 444 ..4( RSV. 10:1619 Nr •0•! WO DUO • WWW1 lw 11 4. I.LMY10M4 Max WI 1*40 , 15 rO 0•1.* •0t 04. •N;: Y 1:'.0 1110.! 1Ry (OM IV OM (0044( I. t 40 r . It rlf�i .a • ita W11 awe It+ g141SMEl 150 Mo./ 1.400M•4,a IC 1Cl .10 1 Wm it al e nwc.11.(41 414• 0.4 M w 1,1 4 4 .•. W 10 14.006 •1 M. .0.00 tw..1w1 WI LR5 .10/4 UP. al aaR•r 4 rMa101!5 9..00 a 0•11,1•M vo !WY 14400440 tat. 44111 M 1 410614 94.4.04 .V1 00.1 1104•• IL u 4. 0, IV Mitt M 4500 (AM 44 •441 H•504 Mole •4'41 Uwe.Y1 / (4 LLUL1 P 0•A •4:50 W{ taasimDrYS4'('4.114 0050 4 15 LC 1::•41' I4K 12 ANTENNA AND CABLE SCHEDULE I 1 TM -32 � •.'1 i1 4101' . car 1101 142929 411 Uv.1C 7/10/■6 .1 /.6/111 1/21/11 ` • 1./.0/1 I O SCI I?lIO'• U. 142.1105 : 1. CI 01117 0 1(4Y •(lOCA010w w Maximize Comm` o Group, Inc. /'o CA 92•02 [sr'V( (511 7145 -2170 .x (4041 7 - 311! ,! 7 1110 AA. W. It 251/ :•111_ WA 00109 +44.voance911e “n• J n' 143 IM- i? .'1 YAYI • shnsESS IffifCU6 8Li4NRK NRD! 3? 1 m tl 400* 1,04141 s1Ki a t 1114/1/144 IA 92409 FI•xW9 Pr/ 9m tae► O.lrnn 71.Ne, [*.race va Canxol 81..,1. 0111 r1w r.+.1�.:. �• NA.aN... IrW1.16..Av. w� •iaw.u ..... •• •• 4. wr... asµa . •s•.• V•^' . -wn:we . ••••••••••.11.1•111 • ar. •••1.0,•1•. w�•••r..r•N.a1.•1...r •...w.a.r.. 11. 1•a.4MNwr tea. rte: sA+r ±v .: •••• • w., ✓ F1611W11vSa Prism N oel* 01NAao: NhY9„ Co.o . and Capwly 1P•011t.A0:11 rrl....wa wMi r . eV .110 Mw:la10l.Yala•. 0 1rIM mlRS�mO 0 - ® ® ® ® ® ®® m daS� :. NMI ways ..r+.w.aa.ro• • FlYen :wa . - .... ..r.N. w...w 1. _a r..... w..•.• 4!. q• •�.a • ....a6.. mvir FLEX WAVE PRISM 3 KATNIRE1n Nanwa y w,asss 11/1!1011 en' t1•u: h imaal AnMnw tw.n..arw•..... •• rla rA•01• .w.' — " t v.: °115 .l...70 in .1 aOnV%1 Not vmw(..n.a 0 M. • MY•1••.N•.•• r rP - .= 1 Wei►.' s. V.=. • 4 � � *1. ... : .w..w .•rv.', t="'" 1 'vir'. ....... =..0 i� 1r" KIITHR p°i'1''l 1M10891 SCALA DIVISION 00 Owton4 n000l•n.lAnW.n 13., I :=,.1. _.. KATHREIN ANTENNA 840.10626 �.M M•N. .aw .1 Na an. N• 1. . .. n.. ....inn.a.........:a.....•••••• . ..... ••.. �. •.u. . r�fi:�:.. 921:""004 �i«".`.i+wuia r ...wn ...• KATNRE111 SCALA DIVISION r w.. 0 3 VEY KUTHREI SCALA 01010109 N 2 KATHREIN ANTENNA 800.10270 x•r 400 10270 ..• 7::wio: Arnrra 008 taro or 191•, ..ANw8 1J 1 TM - 32 � 710.09112 0110(1 114111 FOIL CO I4/O1ECl A0. 142829 REV DA10 1 2 /10 /10 2 2 /10 /ID 3 1/ll /11 z0 111:N SP ARK10111YA coil 6(00CA110N a 8 /3/11 0150810001. i.U.P. ORAf9AGS 1011 CVC01 14.0414 ORM RAIL \: 49/110100 N- w 1 Maximize Corr p Group. Inc. 1351 P000NA 90. WOE 100 409098. CA 92902 OH CC- (909) 780 -2170 MX. (.09)'94 -311 000Nr [ 9,0 ASI�C F 0011 !„. 5011E 250 5101110. RA 98109 .lr•r.e.onresalS.con. K IIE ND TM -32 J 5110 9000 & ADDRESS: [I COLA ATM NODE 37 .1n 9111•14090 92,11013141 11MCCIAA CA 92592 SOW D100 A rmA:T1RE ei'I'•alcAi1aoz C MN 9y: m(13/0.0 05: imam 8 11 PC A0 1'10 51REt MOWER MMUS. T3 4 PHOTOSIM VICINITY MAP I g1-5; �1>sl 3 SITE PHOTO • VIEW 2 SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 1 TM -32 � TV. CONCRETE 514301 0011 100 CCI PROACI NO OATS 142829 CUP. DRAWINGS FOR .!/10/10 WENT REVIL# 2 3 /10 /10 ORM 3 1/11/11 20 MMAI SP 4 6/3 /11 REVngN PER Cm RELOCATION C 4 11310 Cv2NCNI CAW P1A97 141RAPlD 0.. OCSCMPM)N / \ Maximize Comm 1.151 POMONA RD 94116 100 CORONA. CA 92982 010101 (909) 289 -2110 fAA (909) 992 -3113 1100 000IFR AVE. SUITE 250 SEATT1E. WA 08109 ... crO.ACOn4.9O0 11160 EXI511NG 51TE PHOf05 riN 8r 1CNECKE0 NY: MOAN o PC AI 641 V114341 P1 4 SITE NO.: TM -32 SITE NAVE & ADDRESS: MCUTA REIAURK WC 32 n\ 198 O3AO.IV8 W 0001ma 1CUCCAA CA 92592 P; ,rem .8114.1 tADLIKAX. WSI1..I.S S?S'1ChfRS .1.411 M 14 IU \S A4R 9004 or 048+31^. Irw:JpLL [0900 8(Ob9aS .010.990 ,0 0 W W1 IT vc09 !.1 11.3 C 0L T1.RZ. 11 10318600 IAf C1C: 114 340 Was 441318 9, 5. MS , 0 08OTCS 111 31141. 1/luONC 11104 903 03ge1, CA 1011 a 841841 33 L.0 11 11u0. 9:4(4 911 11.11: 831011 0U107e, CO,n.c10A 514, roost ND 001 Inc (3300 0.) N, OM,: 01■,149 0,04 31016 !OIL Know ,N18rs below. \ Callbetore you dig. SITE PLAN (r) yMr 1,y7 3131 • _ !() 6'96 49p,I ♦ (f ) )4'030' 181£0 i a ,2 141 6111110 I81NCf1 (Rh-J, 1(11 Rllt _.ENLARGED_SITE PLAN. N R0. CO•CJ1Cit wit; MN' 1✓.Itt ti 1 TM -32' 4 Y) 2 041_ .3 d / 1/21/11 6/9/'1 :.IS(13.11911 1010214 ^112 Ia104A011N 0)1P 04AA0105 Ito 3131190 1)E3931% 0 (4 m 1010* 5 d Oak Maximize Comm. w Group, Inc. 31 0800, CA 92982 0F1'33 (909) 786 -2170 (931) 992- 111.1 1 NAME 8 707431SS. x , NORTH / %,:(l'74 A 142829 1310 0091318 oar Staff 250 1141113.. NA 80181 .ww.c40.n4OSW eon, _ 32 14Ec1L1 NI NCDi 32 '1.Y91.99.(tet01048.0000010 /10031184 CA 02992 ( 111.1 NOTICE .. . :::: . .7.17..WV" VZ.U.r ::"-- 7 4.2 . .2="e •. ' ..... " -... "" ..... • ri:47:=1.111.11• — SOUTHEASTELEVATION — COKREIE sII.&l 016.1 POS e." Waltrt PlY111 tan. reen 10/1•11 70 07. C047.1 WW1". 4 Di -.-42M 2 NORTHEAST ELEVATION 1 TM-32 &Gal Wit .'40e7.1 'SU 142829 PtM! .040/1. • maximize com,"\ Group, Inc. • OFFilf. 1000) /80-3770 if) no2 777.7 CIa Mt NO, TM-37 • 8)81 & /O01080& 41.CiliA II/PAM NM .....**Intwateeecaua HMCO:A Cl 07097 .1fCKED ;70: A2 Horn ) 17 • 1211.18214611S:= :6-=.111.640= 61 101 \ s..„ NORTHWEST ELEVATION •0•10/•• ULM -zpr.4 cr i.'„ri••••0 ■•••••40 604 ••••■•••t echos 32 CC.C4E7t 510107 i0011 PC3C 4 Own.. 0.04•11 I .0. Mi. 04011100. 1■00.040 (awn •ah 0 (er f3141747 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION c11/1-32 ■00 41/0 142829 3/10/10 3/16/10 0,ryt/t VV 04,4 04414V41(,, rilcle , 11 , 11 0111.1 4035506 410 14 Ki0C.A1 314 1030 50 .331T 11, *0 1181 m Ife C omm. 1351 90lChA 400 'CO 1010740. CA 32802 9 4'03 4009) 766-7110 .0, 006) 66; 3443 1100 0 414 UHF 35.4 616 06 98 • •■•.< 1 1 h0f TM- 32 SU; 79940 h AI0*0 : BECUU4 WORK 10 Si 16 )101.00.61 . CA 62592 na)C CTL TM -37 NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE D' iN SovT� hloE -f OR -1 1fESTOF WINCHESTER,12-9 185` EST OF C/L OF YNEZ RD. TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPUCANT CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS 15110•1 DA61lt 1101.1000 1110 DOOM RIG MAK 265 GAM ROW. 182) 3 - IM 1/00 M44i 061) 3 6265 JURISDICTION WV Of 1, IO[O., CA 90140 rMK 1.51)'506-5165 3 (851) 41-603 ENGINEERING FIRM/SURVEYING 019[9200 «400000 YW ;035, 091 00I01IA ne OAT 100 019040 4(0 WAWA Val. 110 - 431-003 IA0 110-014 -0112 COORDINATES 30..035714 IOAO' •In.1665. PINVIfft 5M 1,04. (658) 7u -8576 P f Na b0. 0X090 • I,G7: (351 510.0166 06MOn3*I00 094511 010 A 60 ( 013) .101100) 756 -14.1 Warr 1 4404!: ▪ 0901 11404 (1115) 361-3507 055001 4341x3 VCIW 43504 5015 (410) 765 -6726 CODE COMPLIANCE: • n WOW 0.4 ,111.535, 04 M 0300 • rc w w0.0 5062 5 r b W W II V WU. 0 0111 1 0 1 YN 0 A6) 0RYS 016 I0ce/orr /ca21r 10:21000 11110 4180 ■161•1535( p)4. 5411 cow 08.150 MO( ,51 IM Sq IID.1 ,0W1 A,)YY 40(11004♦ Nqt NO : „It mere) .,..fwtt0 IO�� I ti t. W. A , A. N041 10111 WAY rat is 1 65r ,. 10 a MI WOO WM. 666' 1. .1104 010! 4 WW1 A M5AM )01 , 5114 1 4 1„W:IC PO= I4.)III/6.WA11 11. t )1150 W 0•14 W11c( Will Walser 666k maw Mwt mans UA 0101031* W Mtn" 4On416.Q5OAN* MAW wAd.0 301 4,8,40 IWO00 /100506 N>a MIt WO. 3406 MLA raw 1 4 WA 1012 0114.150 ANA UR *NNW , Ant 11404 wt. RAW 00400 013.V4111* Mx 01 001.11,3400 ,QAN ,d 1. VOW WW1 o� , 5" .,1 x4 MIAOW 406 VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION DATA TABLE RRiip Wlq •V 99604 Ron W .W N/A AMA WW1 AI lw WA : V1 N• wont own n 400. kit (*00 0 Y 041M W' 00 O 0/1 0 `I61 00 .mao0101' WK1ut • L'0P/t41M1IN 914/105 106 SHEET INDEX ATM -37 CONCREIC SMUT UM 70(0 CO PROJECT 110 142829 RF0 2 .05MIO 0(010 517E N0.: DA10 OCSCRPiaN 1/26/11 ORSP 6/2/11 NLV1510 4 7 111 077 RC 1OCA )40 1014 [:1x1.1::1 1 :N:. 145 AR.0 (Pr w Mexlmlze Comm. ..., Group, Inc. 1 351 POMONA ROAD 55070 100 CORONA. 00 92882 Of Mr. (999) 786 -1170 FM: (909) 992 -3 3 1 100 DLYILR AVE. 50115 250 50011(0. WA 98109 4Y.1o60co11M.com TM -37 2400 161840 • 14101 HU- TEICIIA IOIA'ORN NODE 37 40019 626 1*081 I0' 9449 6 41 6 110• 7000003535 CA 92592 11651 11101 VILE 5EEf W11 90. 1:111.0 Or: VO 5C 1 81 MM WA TI ,010.4004E CAKE ECI IEOULE ,.. . 440 111440 4-01 / 444 05. 4"4p• 44.11 I ' I Y 0 Y /9441440 1116 NM 1.34••' • ./r Id .00 101KV 409 098• It'-•' 1 I/o' 434 1 10. .04Kh W 1041 4/' ANTE4X06 CAOLEECADULE 900 r•^ 4441 Ni /wan o 0* 1 4 Od• 1101044 ;,34 an 4-1 0 •••-•1782 101.1' 1 1/01 Nu 100 Or elm Nat 10*w IQ•m• mkt • wok 00.0•,04.9044 LEGEND 49 U 10441 os 17 34010 1.0 1�1' 41.4 O 1'.0. 146.4411 014104.4- � - •444 (41 100 • -.- 4✓0.14 - W TOM - - - - 40■ 4•0400 � 4 •. 11 •11.041 41 04*00' - 1 - 4.40114101 34144 • - (- 90C1K4 CCM. 1 - COM - rMA03 0141,1 - r" • .. YC 4V 3t 4t5 .134, r 3 7lll �•� 410..r Nwb 8 O 11144/411 K0 C .. 441. 01001 N AO - 404 01x.1 4. -40 1 10 w „A 4W,. , O 4I4441.4, 414 01 •^4-l. 9..a\ 1/0164. 001 M• OM 'WOWS A.0 N:..1 0M • ■ • (34O 17/-20t1. • W 19.0101 141 K W% 0 q OCC �I 001044011 00 64110 n 41110.9 404 90444 X' 4VNMR 4• /4•1 WO. •. Ca. 0•,31 034 11 h0 9.41911111.91•11C9•16 I0 MOL••••5.344 1•:11 cowl VaL 1.0(Vat 60 PM 4 0•3 C6446 0•16.4 10YY.I 4-4 a 191. 4• MN[UI • 0 10 144 ✓ 041 00' ./1* 1010 40100.0 4* 00 X mow fr.2' 10 4 10 1'104 - 0111 p.. .'4K 1 .0001 LL + •u .4 .3,40 1 .1•,/.• 44 4- fW140rOK101 414 16 1 awl 1/14ac40.1411/ .46 CO." 444• 90.10*• (0 a1 40.411 0•.401 Ce4.0MO /1V 160:491011,0 SUIII 1p . 1 M0 10M6 • ■••• 1•0 • 640100 M000.[ 11 14 4444.11 11t•w9. 14 NYC PAM 0L� * 111NiV0004140. 4-10010000' *00 4/ 413.4rTO • 414 ✓513 4 Or Dom ly( mw 41,1fa40Mpr� 54 0404 4114.1144 0. 1041 \'1!d AOa 03 • 0.0040)10.0 1.41 40 0 0091 0 17411 s X010 NUWI401•4014M.10 Yr Cr /;4 44- M 4p01 (00 lM 90490. 01'• "Al 41m 0110 04.00111 a * 4.1141: A4. 411 0011101•,0 ton.... 4,1• e_1 im 0114L9.et n •PMr Ca AMP ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES 91,.,01 X COnr, 1101 *t 140.•0.10, 444%10 404 •110 0.011.4 044/4 100031 0 0'101,40 M 10•KL.4 kW 0lgl�nl W11�O�4+p Y��OWt�)111Y Y•JOMEO >4 SY 9. 4 • rl 41:1 YO0 4P•J • M •••7244 r 41/.•x. YI E M . Z lrx 4 ru ulv 4*1 *40 Y.fi :.•) ->b1 19 01 444 K "001''1 1 4134.4140+.1 • 41•001 I11• M 101041 04AAx 04100.4241 0491 144 rte. II. twlt•444401 OAK 14 01MO441 NM A 014111:• TO •73C 06 3009 Won raOW. 1114 V 041644■ • 01.. A. 2W:.y WX 1099.441 W fwltwl ap •0K 4•,.. 41, 4 0400011.•.01101440401 .w 14 M0 M 4 J13 0.04(• 1 101:. W. , •111r 0.1C 401441* 94161/44- 19 0 011104 .Ailg 401000.011 0 14 rnwawxt 1+ • (sox Ile,. or N 100.4• . •••• 00•.40 Mo 4005 �t11»40* (4 Y r . Tf = W <MMJ•O4-U 01 *1910 W. 0l 3 Am. 0 0cV(4W[[wKz r 1 711 . 111n(44 q) 4114 44140010 SMO.q may 10 • 4 110401 • A , ••• M a0 o•D•oh11Cb" 4.04 V M 0 4 Nw • 6/C4 049.0 • , 1 44.4 44 MI 144•401.04*1010 41040 Iwo 0'11444 10.0 44 M 4/.4 11/44•.11044• 00.11; 14401 4. •••rw 4004-: I0I0 w AGOG . 0 0 4 %COM VIM 14 94 '1. 0/./ 4-1 O W aM/t w uuna r�IL M 44 wt cc • • •1,4 10. Q4- 10 • w' 00 *YOC IY O M 41 )au1141 . 1. vn,.)✓ 4 .1•414 0 , vylj•iW 444.�.�WY•WwVp 110 41408 ;,1 >.(• N. W. U rv404 w 0: <4•u11t 1wV 9411 N 001.1, 34.1401 C4 Cs•AM44 Nno44utti W51lt01 s /146•441( 11 404..4401* wVO40114 OO' 1u 4.10.4 4Y T.v.••r G4w✓f 01 49.0114 10 Wr •n ,m 400.1..•010 n ax«. 4. 0x.440; ..9.M✓: 541 R0 <MO�OwYArY411 Un00 wurV.'9 0 Iff I 1 41400 twa , sttt�KO• Y t 1d *.0 l* ~4110�i 4-041,'400040/4-00019, 14 '.441011 *0 00 40419Ci 944 1 OVW.1 041111*0 • I01 4n442a NA M14. •o 0, 00001a% 41 00 IMM0. K1 1.41104.140 RA. • (s L 0. Kw 0141„ 1040 1•'44 VLlw K 40.aat04II0I, .i 0*1 14ww11040 i 1 ALn 0 :.:0.1100 , u "/ 84-0'4- ` .14 00:.1.4 4041 11001 0 tM4p•99<h1w40* R 1444 0 4 4 400•••00 Or 14 10 0.91!14.4 1.404 K14 400400 h1'4 10011 001(0N 4404 84 w 45,110 Y 04400 014, 400111 vl Iw4. 40 r 00 � 40 ...40 01 41. , .4. . .I 04*11 O i4-, 4 •0011 1144011.4. 04-410 1690a Ml W • 411 I > 40 MUM 110Q: 4104 441 4 44 VW. nue= 164 IT 0 4 T 131 Arius Ow l '1 MUM .4.41 344 010 1141•05 404901 0 10•52, 410 0. 0 134444 w •••••8 1•• Kral 4-0•• 44 0-0040 400111 1/04 •g ... •` i N BCl Imw4 01 40 4 = 01 0 tga I 1 9 11,. u ryM a ps 1 nos •••110 f00,1 4-4011.4 .111•11• 1.44 4.000 r 404 34;1 O4 1040 IKI 0. IC 4%11 4X00* Yon 4111041 Ma 0l 78 101 C A W0, 0* I Of VA( GA 61010.0Mib 4.9 • 144 1'00 RM1 C XQ (0,4'1 Ot 4 l 1•. 88•5 000.0 10 .04 411 Co 0 14 19x4 . 34 AMU •. 00 0,11 S0 e10 042 *110 WM. 4 i m (494414 • 1.11 1/34 LIW 14048 11504- 051.4 • II: 0411.a4 °M O 914 004• 9,41 Ip 141 .311 1 GENERAL NOTES a 4044 0*MS • PI 460.00C W a r q 41 0411 SW4f 0 04101 0 710 WKS IA 010114 li\GIi01WW2•-n O0 0MT Mt•WI10 MAUI • M 0� I Lp OWNS N✓100.43•44110/ 0* 14 49.44 4 1 34 11401. .311 1 1411 41014 • r 111:•1914:0 ▪ 01. 044 4 4 W0 410• r 0.01 owe. urn, 9 um. Im a•a 4• CNA /0101 3:1. 1. I4J1,1•ICIOI .I• YV M cam.., MPS .•OY4L ✓SW 411.0614R 17•916•1114 • A 101 • 0 441 OWC 0 .111404-.) I40 ✓ 04*41 h.0C14 or w91N.4 I. 4414940•1, 9W 0•\1 4-4-44 1 1 1444.001 40 •O•∎. 01M n00M 126.9 i ■14 :0 4-001 Or la en 01O 1 ma 40 HOWDY M MAY• 440400 o wIg4m0 1 � eM 010400410 )1111 40004000 WW1 00410.1Mq.:.a /411•10, 01101,1 • 40413 44 01 Orr NMI P 90 tat. 16441 1460 004 Rf44L 1941 ' IA1.44.10 Myna 0*Qh 0044 .01 0441111 ASO , IMN 4•41% 0711 e l.ACC 4 0 CM 04•00 MI0.1 611.11 114 IV 040000 0 0 * t fa 4 It*1'.40 A10 r,I. 11.44010 •1141144090 01•4961 M A k Y. I 0Wr 41'401omo• m10* num.. 010411 , 10 01,.0000 344' •i1K Sri 040041 . H ]. 996A CP 111 Lk 3100 Tu. AMP IC WK. IN 16 10614 Muir I I 00410/10 V 0/401,40 01 1 0114 11 If 1104 C•42,1•1 '00 I I 01 • 4-00. 0OXw0001 04490 0 00.0YH/MON ti 4 44 041411 0*10 w44 434 • 0.10000 • ••••• • 10.4M 0 010400 0444 11144111.11 0 (0004 OM.O.l 1W0 * 0114 II M WM,1114 41YO( R. • 0941X.0 W 0.31111•01 400 MAC 614 • 4600 0. 01000 1010 090' *10'010 iW La 0 341 011140964.14 00, 0900 44 441 44 04 ram. 000 00100 01111 0001] • M no. o llama ...AA. 1.048 .1 AIM 0014.4 4.0 100LY0001 Cr 41440rm X/41100.9 CAM P.M 4ri •44,40 In IA e1444.01400. •434 4440'/4-1. H Aran Ml *um 1•04 •149011 090 .1901• IMO 00441,0101/11 •1 00109911 A. 11 1000.00 04,V 4014- 0 000 104 9YG44r.ma wave .7 1014 U440141,70. 0 (OVJ41141 4.110.• 1001.01 040001 M O . K . UMW. 0M3444w son 1.SY r4Y4411061l MC 01904fr07 Mkt twyp&1000µI O01 VW. • YUtt04u 0100. 004x9404 3"'h/W N o*•C•• • • 34 1• = 4 IM mh Mio 4 loCI•N � in •11.104 4 � cores *344E LMMY12144MO4i10*1MOIL. M 4®.0141.101 W40 X OW01W01 Kett Know •stars below. Call before you dog. N •a. / + \.a 014 1 W4 \\ 1 j » au. 1 4410 1901•4: P094/99140 Cot. .o Y 00090 0 10 •0001+- VAT • M.A. • 4r*03 W OA. Al 0 0414 01* N A1 4464414 11600. 1100•e11M 4 *'4.1•.4414.000 010.4.10040• N 4. /*0.4•64•• .34 w 01144101 1,1 4-001** •44.00 l •• 1 414 4.1104 *9 PPS •101041 ••••• 04 04041 41 V. 6144 01114. 064114 91 d WYg1140W941Mi4W 1 1*0 011/44/4 r• SAM 01 T.1,. 101 1( 044.100 V. COM OM ••U la•ml 04-•'040 1 0 0 04094-X444 30• 11 man T 9 .04 u X(404.1441. S4 1 1 N 100./0, YAW, .1 WO MO. OCt ••••40.40A14.■ 4 000*040 40 OU4*01 4104-.41 0.11,10 (1400011010 0 4103400/ 0 •• 4 *01, 4400.14 1010 04 041 W JO0 0414 604111•1 1 0 1Mg10 NU OW IL10 RIM SU 0.• 10/4043444 ... •4 4 y41WC ,a . 4400,4 • !. 1 ✓ I 0 IOU Oife . 0009 0414.1,4- • \40111 q 01.11* y a Y4-• t9 04)11 44;4 v Yt4w t =IT rI IP.1 100'4 � �9011R I0N / 0 041, 144 4- •6141 000/x' 41.1••1 E W • 14X44 4 Y1[<a 0801 1111.41301111C4•4 X4410110 WR4w 10400(410144 •d 4-4 4Va .4 *0.41404 0'1:.004414 W 4011 4490 1010040 11444 '041 41/ la NI4C•1111014 AY.. 00.41f YLO 014440 WtO RMI 1 Mwni 0000., 7.41a9•I.MOLY S M 4 S4 00e 0 ' 1 1 1O CAW • 0w 0O•••••40 14160 40444101' * 017,.14114 N 101 . M 4 4414010[ 1111403 OM .•00.1. 4.• I4- 01•✓. 01 0 0 400/ 4 1 100 =TV/CC K al 4111034 010 IOM 64 40 ■40141•: (0040 44814 1 N 4 MI 1140 co 01,11 Il4w 0104 4403 •• 0 V• 4040 4001 4!11 / 4 014 41410 °MCI 0••••• 4.041:10 • 44 .001-• ink dock • W1W 41 At t iltt 0�� ICC 01184 111 X 010. O (14(10..0407 •:.,1 13 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULESE 2 "TM -37 � '4010 � • C Maximize Comm. ®01 0101 Group, Inc. 46.1. 0..1401.01 :(11( • lo N,: .1.070* ROAD CA 92E82 -( C(: (9001) 796 -71 (999) 992 -3 �...1* .1..01•_•.- -.. / VA 'AWE' 110D 00111074 AVE. 59•TE 250 SEA21000, 41 09109 *I...4. 040(19 31.0 N0., IM 37 543E NAME 1 AOOgOSS DIVA; NL'IICIX Nga J1 4 4 011 00 9 •01591.121 WNW 01j,0 u. Ii41ECU.A CA 97597 Mr Or/ (WM. RANI 44010 I(IXC0 91. 9 0. s0. -4031 T2 W 44101 C4 2 . J 1 le FI.xWay. Prism HMO. Ovid.. IN ON. CON'A71 aM CA(•KA, M �4M d. V. Ir •+.Y.. W e...4 VI .rW V.. •.M..••••4 wlr.4 w'.wrwpye.. Ih.• ... »... ...1.........,0.1.",.... «•..,.' «.".,." ° .wW ti.. tuw.awwr..a.s4ww . wv.n a". wow b r�4N W.• . rO1....rw,...W.w"n 1". FIMWavo Prism Rover OONOa W.wts Cw«a9. and NP.ov 52.61Wtiem """rt" . w i.1Me w4 .•. se ••e • �""...�. 0000.. � ,1 ......... .' pn • W. • • 11/M.h.r 0000 0000. 0000.. M M b . 000 ... •. HQTNREIR A " M "Y •40 10.00 SCALA DIVISION 16* Named D.104°4111W4.. n w. w� ■•■■ • 4..I.vrr.r•••••••• . n. • M. r"+."N.N1 hSr.nl:r sr- Iti ... .A" Nr- '- e : �� t 1:�3 r te+: 11 ha 1 •' fir G J �f MITHHE111 SCALA 01V151011 u+.ti4rr o• Wy LT= la 00'..00. FLEX WAVE PRISM r 3 KATHREIN ANTENNA 840-10525 • ll.NrNNry rM 10818 Ire m Oi1dM.l .1 r. 6.• r....OW. ...A. •.rla.wurw KRTHREIII SCALA 0(01510N Won .4 P ▪ _ i.*N .. . .ro, _ . ▪ °rr ..M. LIWIWIEN • — :: 3d.. .tt • . 1 A s1 `♦'_ M =re.. .1100•.' !1:2•••• KHTHNEIR. SCALA DIVISION r wn KATHREIN ANTENNA 800 -10270 P now. • \ • • 1 • MI 1 .iwl• :.h. 000102/0 65' Tn-te A.1 NW m. NO 10/20 547.1.4.80• Manna " ovvolcmvs yus avw .• r . w 1 A TM - 37 l'01A:NLIi 5110[1 140" POII CO PNINCT NO 142829 (EV 2 DST( 1 /26/11 1 DESCMP1104 _ 0050 RE040011 PER Cm RCEOCATION 00(41 11016 PRLPAPLD 01 1 MaximizeCom r ` V o Group, Inc 1)51 PO40NA ROAD SIAM 100 CORONA, CA 92887 OFF CI (909) 700 -2170 1799 (909) 992 -)1t) 1 100 ObrCR AVE. SUITE 250 SEATTL MA 90109 slle cc, TM- 37 CE RAMC 41 At10RC$5 IEMECUTA NU O6 37 1(R si 0 RI(N., 16 1 TEMECUA CA 92592 uN:00 (1n E: AW1rK.Sl l '17:u KNIL4J J J f'I- iOTOSIM VICINITY MAP n EW2 L;I3 SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1 W 101 C, 142829 ..3C✓ 2b!.•. 6/7/11 ..1411 M .� MC: irls 1 r.., 1474411 U1 r • 1 Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. 311 POMO4A ROM SOIL 100 CA MS) 000101. CS) Off:^•E (009) )10S -)170 r :9091 ±9) 1 —`_ di VI .A [9n4 100 3EY:FR AV SUIr /0 EKIIIL lM 98109 c •Olo COSEO COT [5,0 C 40: ` TM -37 'NW w p,'11Y71SS Ifl6.CIAA 11[11fDI ( NOD[ 37 ~VI / 2812 '11 mug 91/ a Coo, 11 M. 015 J rr, 111 i.4 PiIVO ) NH 10 IC11EC40) 'W lG j SC :l :E' 11.000M. 1 t ENLARGEOSITEPLAN 11'1 ISO ML � LOCNOF V WAKWr, W45 Men C71 90Kn•04 0.700 at n0 RAM 5087 mall 07 Vi 66 .WAnt 5rKir0 MKCON 70016A, b ir�[ 615 1507 1AL ;' t 11.1W0.1077 */ 6,7 1051111 7 P611 1Cy15 rO/l.C 1/1152 e■ Owlp AN 4100 inaAta4 00761 not a000 A R ocar 0154 at) at oari,17 460111 wawa analO ntA. 5' � 7 , 454A0' Ent q It420 .ICLL 611,17 MI, NO 0100 ILSI 162U GOWN 152 5 10671 11117 (7) 61o$' ORAN 1 RIDn NOR 111 R1N 1 TM - 37 ` , .o.. .. 2;rCtI 1211 rou 1 / 2 6 / 11 6/4/1 OC 085 666.6,061 7E11 0 6650601100 1YSINO !OR MANS IWnA7K011r O• \ Mexlmlze Comm J Group, Inc. 1351 6 •001 ROAD SUITE IDO CORONA. CA 42892 0'71Ct (409) 786 -2 :: / 61' (5,19) Y57- .11 tt'Nt [152 NO EC. 142829 TM 142829 TM -37 152 Walt @ A02NES5: 1C.1lECAA NOOK 11CCE ', tOl4111 KM, **MAO (AP nl to 11610CNA CA 964112 Lrrn 0711 5it It/N J 6' 705; . 2.Z.:1222=112. ,4 Iv., ,e forA 411.04 \ \NOR MEAS r ELEVA1 ION 11J1.1werm 10 ;;I:= t•t•Mon IR.Tr o.uset 0060) Agris I*1.116, tITIK, A " 0414 0.0.■ 0001 1.4n 00 2 NORTHWEST ELEVATION 1 00••1. ...M. WOOS. 6,4r1480 051.5.0.3.519-- (I) .11.ht MP* „.= 3 IMO 19' COVNI1E 9 (Go( N).t vie iI).c.aw 1. 100» " (01 '0» ...I 1 0 .41d 4.4•4 Oslo svos AY OA 110.4 MAYS 4-0.00 a 1' 2 seas, nen 11/1-37 LINA.. II 51(41( I CM Pt. 10* 19104(01 3 142829 1 . 1/ 0050 6/3/11 40W40 h (MIL 015C$01104 '5000 I0, rum. rhiTurfn hr *Ali Maximize Comm. W Group, Inc. ■ .., 0000 fa 54 un <;w1E 100 0014094. CA 92092 0 (5C. (909) 400-2440 ■". (009) 0464'-24'2 .--.-. ,•••••---...---..- - ClAtAtt (CATER 490, 9.0410 250 51 VOA 98109 •A'a c(A901:9909 TM-37 SIIC WM: h 14000595. iturcum tEPUORK NOCE 31 taddr 040 OCerk E 40502 Oil IWO 11 CA 92557 C . 1nm ( tood . 71‘042, A2 2 NOTICE CVS THW S 32' COI.'CAEIL 5 , r5t! 410(41 150' ON I,4NA •tN•M C.cnwn wc.r MACAW 50 VON O.II(0 50(11 0091 11. et Ad- E r lie 01 cautYu� N1.r 111 .749•0 411. 11 M0. WIH Id AAA 111011 c• twA+n e4nrt 1'CNM 31 CON1l 51 115(1 NC 415(1 t 1•lkl. 0111 t5II- M.M U rut* ...AC /11191 I003 • W MI[VLA 7 1iw_MW i� cum NN Mil r., 5••11• W) • 11._ , _ c V?6/11 5/3/ 111 CCII ('954.511 142829 02 ['ESCROW/. 4550100 PER c 4CLOCAI9Mt 55(5 1x Out rtl(N41Et1 N. W Maximize Comm. � Group, Inc. 51 1'IiN0W1 0053 -" V1E 100OY CRA. CA 92052 .if(IC!: (905) /96-2470 Al (009) 002 3:13 '15 [ VI 60 i 04.9759 AVE. 51117E 260 t ATI15. WA 96709 • .. VMIYt(It «1 snz 90, TM - 37 ■:1. NAVE h 5042R4 SS: T!kAIIA N! iMK}f R t1 O 1/ LiA5 A 0 /101545/2 WAIAO .9 11 Y1 1 CVCCl9A CA 9259? aY -E1 '11)9. r��vnnays I CRAWN 95 itNECNCO 61 V5 S5 ! :.'C Cl 11UMSEO: A3 491410 W 1Y / // '� ai 2 1 APOa APPLICANT CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS TM -38 CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE SOUTH SIDE OF ZEVO Rawk. .125' WEST OF CENTERLINE OF DIAZ RD. TEMECULA, CA 92592 0001 079700 wit7MU,•h 119 Ott111 M 7,97 1. fO ( 0 71 40 06 . 0 1.10 90 40(w)JA -Sm JURISDICTION 00 , 3010804 100CMA 10 02250 1 9 9 CaN190 C C 8 A ° STLE ENGINEERING FIRMISURVEYING u1 � WK10M 76190 MC c ANL 70J 90 90498 1Y ..(9094p ?00 On- 120 - 3113 COORDINATES i s1a. 1a - 190.01 10.06044 (7904. 3840408 AMt In -0240 004 (210) 711-871e OMA,StO PAWN 9.10,0 Aft( 100, ]9.08.00 91964004 007+048. 0.090 0119 WS) 09 -1721 Mal <00.11W.9 40101 070. 1,093 08104 >. W-J10) CODE COMPLIANCE: S 9w. R 0094000 • 9 9 0499090001 09911* 947070. 40M.5 or 11c ratans 0010 N 4➢140 19 10919 7.0 /0■09015 AIO wGl/CM /90140. MOMY.= 1. 1070 00(0404 91414004 0000 7, 001004 00430 0000 77 • 720 PROJECT DESCRIPTION iTM -38� SI �tSi A S SN I ...16 N O , 1 1 , W IW I MO SW IW 9 00 10 fl W 040 Sr . 1.01.■1 Swf11 MP .pI Ca 0t77 51x0490 700111 Pat •1 N.' 611 9 .mow9 04 nr L. 009 0. 99 90 S. 0010100 9 . lot In 1)Y .800081R0Y L 1 IA 5, 7 ca 600 L.3) 3 36 2 93 3 61 00 9 .. 4003161 0071 A 140.1 01701093 90 701 701.90 170/70.90 01*0 0001 100001 19070c 189 000 00 007 101.4 9107. 0.q 100•78•D 1000 1004 NU .07 . 9699300 .909 N6u Nt. Mt O 00*00005 745 - 59+408 , 74 71St1 004711009 DATATABLE INK do* 9 OW 0Ia 901 099 it i 41197 w o1it 0u 8/04 900 KW04 WA P190 9093 Or NO WA WA 4/04 tw Wan 0000 000Mt 9004 9700 07090 • 9'. . 90 0990 SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP 00 42877? CO MULCT MA. 142829 I Riv 1 OAK 1/26/11 6/3/11 J ISSUE OA-r ... r.nv:n N. � Maximize Comm. � Group, Inc. 1 351 0010,0 110A0 5075E 100 CORONA. CA 92982 OFFICE: (909) 796 -2170 1047): (909) 992-3113 CI It 1S 1100 000712 AVE SOITE 250 5FATI004, WA 98109 N.0ror0w714.tam S11LN- TM -38 SITE NAME a 0001[55. TEMECULA NUM Wall 7100010/061 16 9311. TCUCCUU CA 92592 11 I n n E 9-Cif T1 Offiato It, 01 Miii,94 2 04 M164DN R 104414 Sd1644.E 9 ' Y • 1 b •4 MC a J11. 10 WO O 109• • y l )a.r • 0/s WI; 9., 3710 0040 1. 10.347 4 1 1 *4711111l CALLA301CO AE *30 00 17 � mt. 44 / 43 014 1A t 4. t .1.0 40,000 4 1 - • 1 ' 1 10 .434 N •1:04 h. •0e•Y31•••1'•N11••Nr•WM••114r• W LEGEND 0• 141 •. 1 100017. •1013 • 40401010 1.10001. • gat., CA. :On ❑ (-011)1 114 Es WO. Ira • •.N P. O 14. 40104101 444401 64rv•■/.141 IM 1100 14. •30 - - - Y•.4.... em -- • .-- 111V./I 0 / 5404r (04.11 'I, -1- 1111.11 I..4. - - - -( - - -. (47131,•. 111044. 44 - 0140 - COS 4 CA. (41 - .74 r� y Y K t - -"' Y•@A°tii µ0 4 /,1700 At 04310 41.1 11.13 v .K0 4s0 1 301 7.04. a 1 . w � • 370 q., =.�. (,1104. 1 413 1 * 404 0 0.4 00 100 4(4••00t • b,u 4W 4 •4•s1 1171 70 I. 1 *1 cN. u ( 0 .0115 ( 19 0 11 • 3 u 4 w> r � maia ma 0114-153 .SIG•: I,NI. M004 31' 0143.0( / 117. Ort0q • UM x716. !`W • X 46 1111 C00.1 i 1 ' (4 1 K+ 3003 10 M 734 P.M 3 4 1'0 Pat b nor 0411731.7 0 De 1 0141 00.1 DP. CO .•;� 1 4401 OD 0 3 n. 4 7114 40.1 .. • . A, ♦ - .4. • .1 .110 04) (0704 000 )/a.' +.0 4004 i0iR161Gft lWt v .y 4 34 .1 40.ti p 31340 LLa a .n (Mar es N91 CPO . 4. 134 D +470 t 140 044}, q( ID .11 Al 303:11 0.1147 0004• w orn 0101]0 414,40 = r4, 00t 014] A. M 7440a M3W.. •01 Ni 0011 '434144 • W.I. 1w 4 1000 NA 4 4 " MAC 441 N 040 O .( 010101 `010*4 Y tO6`7.34Ret w C.. N C.• f 114.4 MI04.411. N • 0)1.1014 4311 SI • 01.42. 14 , 101. 4 1.4100Nr1m144 1 q•L0N . 3x14 IR • •0v 0441) 100430* 1 WO YilYNaIA.Jwpm • 11-47.0.411 Ie. 0J NWUp .011(34 N. WO • ,.y au RAMS )!• I1J.1 0 W. `ROW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES • 11 Wa1ra lA• 1 31 1/111 *YIft WI NIYX<O.4. 10041 Na M *40040000. 7*4 4 10IN •n, VaN.0/.• • • 0 11 Allt11 .110/4 Ywnwi M 100.4 t/1/ 1.0 NO. se 1t. Y ,1N. AI 0 .1 t 17 0 1(1000 1111 1. 01 P 0 na • Ian 70 X• No 5 • O0 •n• •. 46 • 104 W V. . W 3..0 • s w4IP'•O(O• .10 0 4 me... 11. + O'!. n0 It W is •..a4n 4t W4:Ar 1.7X3 •0. 44 4. 98 N w • 1 1 . 4 7 4 1 •.0111W& ri 41/ Wt 4140110 4 4104(0010 WI �t 31 A ..3111/02111. IM tit 410 OAK 1f10.4 .Y •110 . Ow 9 00,40 4 Y INtvi1(,il O. 10 • 4*4*4.0.n10 N 1/.) .01 .a. m(0•.• 07. )4Y004$3.4000 4 I A. •0404144. • A. 4.14441 raac:a)r4 Ml.l.Mwn..*4.4If ..0' r,4,w A•.)v:11 J,J1..f 141110.11 ry •.14114174i n4a n OP-...1444:410J00 Jay rNza• 340 w 41.1171 A 40 taws MI . • 104 1oi1Y TNIXO 0.10 on 00 dr 41utO 1,7i,taY1.4 u 1 4 0 • 0 """*"1 Y XlOrT1R1(.traY 000,'1 01 [ nuW 0J1 01 UP 10 n1 CIO • • PIO..110 34 0. ad* .1. eon Mat O • • 40041 Mt .341• r 43044100 7(4. 4 0. W 734. • 4.4' 134• 1 *1 • • 4 *041 P.. • .•t1N. 441 4 h0 00.10 41 7414.4 ..(0A'4Y ,..11 ODIC MAl .70. (( )) •..N'. 0(04 F Oa 7., 0140.:1. or....a1 • I �Yl.w•.. 4Ira0 w 34.1 M,.IN w.n01 ao 04:.0...00 vn0040 N 0444 4 0 W *- 04 * 4 p i 3 .3 1 704 V cwl'6N '1100 O ...4.0X01 .0 0 ri.O M1wv3 4.:1 [ -i. uur. O 131 r •.ro0 t4M .91JC1 0704'4 n.(r.4111' ,310 t i a 4 t a. v ei :aJ 70.114 415*4 * 0 a v(0* l 441 1y4 3 •.01041. 14 0 'r .v• F.t : r 00. Ow OfNZ l- to rNi1:v J:u A A A. torch• t4., 1,34 •YO. 1460 ♦r 3111 u.4.NIlK<,[g4.Nw4. W. 1t bxO W Nf VC 10.4343 4` 0 14 .41tt0 4 4 114 .. w Its �Y.3 -4, 17143 401 ^(V .mini K 4,0 : 0a '.11. 4 Y Lr:.1TP0x*14t'll� yy.- A H 0490437.• Y .f (1131410 r01ya/, I.�oi w(i 7010 4'47. 0770 10431. v .1.1. 1, 1 [ 1 •vlr o 1,0 /OW 44 00A1• .1004 3441(0004. 344 ...r..,n•n 7µa - J t 40444434 01414 700 01004.7 404. i 1.7•010 •4 J4 'op 71st 01 M V» rt „a N 94. W I• 1. 3401)1 4400445 0 Co. 14114 4 11040. 041 Ywr 04.14 0.4 0 W' 11 1 1.01 GENERAL NOTES Qmuttr aresat IL' lmi t 4 dr [ 44 I 7 4. 1 0484 • 3 0: 0 10, 1.5 4..1 10 (440/ 440 4*0 1 /1.Ot • 40 D 110 'X MO *41 9113( 1047 • N 407. Airo3 IYKP MO. 4an 411 l agi W 0 IMl .1 3i a 14341 4 14 cont 4..1 10 x(11 Loth . 1 4L µ t 1 Y i 1 . 4 [: 34: 1 0 ..0.3 0 I. 14 4 0 0. A i. 4e4 (e.. w0 41 *0444 140. own,. I� �1 ` 1Yi 110.,1001 314 LW. PW '• M : 0 Y 1 0 10 0 130 1.1 MVTM t R,0441(D/r0 MO 0 Y, 01..70* 1 44t010H 000 0444, ...la r n. 1,10043 1034 04 100411414 00.100 0 0101010 44 • 0 .4W sac 4' -r 14 0N0 M r 004 401411.6 .7...1.04 740. IS10 0WWI 007, Dona k 14.9 00* X11 0 rp144 t u f 01 4 S.C. (ttaa.? 0 100444 , 41/13.0.0 DD. •0013 CPO 4 t M Mt POP At 007 A *WMr,MI 113J..J . .X I 0.4 (0 041.0101 .70 N =MOM 10470 .1 • N IOWA 1110101.(000111 Mal ens A, • 101 Y MU, tt YO. m , 1/ 4 n x-11. et u 0010 X14 34:1. q 07.0000 qv• 11 MI 1041 NJ n Al.aM a ltcM.. 4. Y. ..V t A2 0 10110. •.p .0 MI. 1110. he sas 3 11 101131 OW YYMIN N D04.'1491011003t* NOS 0411 M1Y[9 .413 0•4 tOMbpM 4 wan w 0000014 ASP. 4 41 14 0( 4 . 4177.40 , 1111111.0. '' 1\ 7 73700 * IIlt 0 i t 0 n 44 0044. 0s 1. .C. 40 • 4 ha 0 * (V Y,a 0W1 .0041011081 t 10a 3 3 4 ( 414 . X •0 MYY.O ,0000 0.1.Wa•w91[ maw Y010410a•.4N 111.0 t 4 41:'14., b100501 Onn re 4 .14MNI0.0 r Nw 134 •011•.0.040 0 4, *VM40117 4. 031■1■041000401410 0.0 • • 4014• M 0140000 0 u h • 4u•.U,a1ty =�I,I4nN4(O N• 4. 4.41 NOR 00. a 4(WM 4 Y40.400.44 00. 10034* M 01000148100047T03000(11(0 11 '.1 1(*Mt 0411W.M 41430Y10b.vIa4*11 , N 0w010N 00. 1141 ■R.yn. 4717 110.1404 N In 011• • 1150 11 114400 04011 0*01. ' 00 0 0 14 t i4 0 1 l I S 0 00aI n u l.4inIlU 9.34 :a a, Ms •.ae Ora. A4.rY • ra 0.r 1.aI4b1r ;n IbsYYn 111400 M YI4tW1•4441104b.4ON0q,Y4400n 101 aCWS4l454l0 Ir 9401)410014 1 t.IW4rH*047±7 X 2 I 0 Mao. OM. MI M 00.0 0• 0410 0101111 *4 &40 010 YIN01 W• YM4 •, � • 7040. 149(1N0,LIN,f41400(N3 I1r'.001111 11 tr.r.Y4 {R<tcN lac• Qat ,•.1. 0"s' 4 • T 4g1AaMM'wIp 4V40141•M'I.4 N M. llW01174 Pt •W9AX01Y0 I[ 0 .4147N 1 rat.14. I0. 4 �( 70.0741•410/41 .. ( m , trot, M 714(00.. IYa 410.0 4M 54 40590(•,44 -�. IN• (w 1'+ 70.• Ov 04 M 4.4 M•0 . 01 0440 Know what's below. Callbeforc you dig 444VM4 14,.w. „4 (2i4 try 40040471* 4•04Wry MI • Il•0.01 • tl 130 ^JI 004 u10..Na.4 -I W(O.1N w' 1144 owl 4.• . aro.. 59 Y 4. N 137004 Y'( .74.044.4 ....pm. •l. •w 1 ) 0..11,11 •40 0.0 .101 111. .1 *111 N 100 ? 470 vly ln A* 04,0 .tor . *0• a. •. 404 W 01 4. •,4.34 0 .0 4 74.13 Es 1 04.740001 ,45 00.30'0' 4 • WMIOM1.IY 00.4041 la oo. , 1. pa47* 4191.ON 00111014. Y 0 .3 00(1.0.03 s 1.44 M Y .0 114 101 4 041 f,114M9 • N MK. 90.4. VOA KIM • M.. VW Av. 10(Y000 03.611 WA YO 344t1 • 43) 0 l(*0, • I' ••••011.1.4.1 ••••011.1.4.1 1 .137 u., . 4.01140) N IM ! Or WL 400w11011*4Na W. pat lxt0000 0 M Wont I0XY)1 WW VIP 40M)M3N1 (0437011V4•.r*10.4V iW4A1lfara.0:,'41144 K9w *77Yt41 0IIYA 7r.4Nt 434, Y 90'4 N IYA.40 .41401 t INY.4. wA 0 4PA.10.10 04101• 00 040' •0+734 40(0 0 4040 ��4T�% 14 'an .1041.1 w i 4x41 441 m. 040'04 1R0/Y5011AVY 0*4 4 050 41 1'44701 �a irir 1A'na a 4 w3ru•a 1404 4...' . * 10.vn 3134170 •o- 7070 A11/.s•.0 040,014 Ix0401 Ali YT31 Of• rt1 Ia91bi KR 010, 1 •4.001. L494. A OU�n 0.17.1.11. DOM. X 4014 00 07 6 0 0t 1 000. 0 •0 54310003 ±040,X4W> AO41 not }040' 44141.•411 Da7M00 5 1 - V.C•04D040.0' p t11.7W.10001.0140. WC 04,0470/4100 014 I.. W.- )011147: 0.1 b.04010110/3. N 4*51 M.0 N •. WM 1*1 COMM b 61 CLAM 40. a✓J r00alt,h4 04L N4 If 4 0001504.84400111x0010. i.4.. 44737 414110a 1770'• 1.1411 •• Cl•A 1W 7.a. OL.ta ((040•. W4 WA.M14 . N 0013 OW. J.11141..... 411 • • ' „0 41 4414' N 15 1.041400 .*Y. 3 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULES) 1 TM-38 � 34(4!. 171 • •. n 0440 142829 1co cum *W. Soar 750 3ATILf. 3444 0X1;•0 w,4lC.K4M11 r '. $rll 1NYL 1 AOOOTS4 1[IIECDIA. NE WA NOV. 14441609347e U5 9/454401/ '. 13303441.04 144 97.502 8 71 keen. V)1E: i R 50tP1. J 11411 1/76/14 6/.1/11 t , Maxlmlze C omm . w Group, Inc. l ti'•••17,A _'n 4)4<0. 0 (70D) /40 -1170 i Ak: (207) •301 -31 J E FLEX WAVE PRISM Fie*Wave' Prism rl'909 0,,0143w WM.. C6Arlw •rd CApr:ay lantcloCcarec a.11.C.CM/14Y4«f/4y i 1.15:1 rw,Gw.ON,.,...aY,•q, w.MwA.M 1 •F. W Ln V* au. bYn W'✓4Nan14Yr.♦ � 41r Ma WSI µ mac. We . $06,.. w,N 1 Ce*Casa.nw.11. /w1wN..ly..Ma 4 r.1,.Mrr... w. rr d kr i.we paw.. arM+•W.tWYU'•I•,Ay...wun 1.,, W r w. u•w,wI.Car"..r.. aN'.w km n•OUbr «Mlga.waN/ruw.r w wyo n b� " u.. � WI. w.• u. Yww anN NwuNra,M V2/.7 W ..O W�"i1�".I•n:. ti..�,.u". ".^. ri. nw ua FiesWave" Prism II.AV. O,94906 Wa.:W Cow."' and C1p.oy 59011.3Aeoa. .w+r wrr KATHREIR PIdislrp 940 10525 SCALA DIVISION C4'DI72/a4 Dla71uwlAd.6. 4 1 A I .w I.I. w,ry u 19.r.w •.. ▪ aaear swam r,r url ra.w.r .($ `, w NWMrrn« ..A.q Wa ne, w, w• . •....../I14.1.4 WN■NW • p rl 11.M..• • Coma tquant, • NI. I•.aAMMI2,1,...Wrr ._ . d�� 7 �T+TTH 1.r F. ir.F /3r"` 1 ':. �� 7ti7 eA� W.•.1 rNrr. .1..... Omar. •■•.■. 1.I.u..a. 'V•r.•... ♦Wlwi.r..rarw (19 F DA *Wow Imo malar.Kalm. KATHREIR SCALA OIVISION W es.. m ▪ - ,I Sdo =i. .r..oaN...A.•A.14.Im,W A..r....rr.w.u,w.. 1 3 KATHREIN ANTENNA 840 -10525 u1a.N1.1.4 16010! ( 91962211213 610 10625 1# OwbAnd 0i odi«d AM««4 I2 KATHREIR1 SCALA DIVISION KATHREIR. SCALA DIVISION . � yu�ap r rwsn. ,�I'.1 w v 'r'.r �r..• n. r.. ...w a4.NN«mo. Yr• + ; ▪ a { • .arw w.Aw,.•.p w".I .r.. rr ..I........... • .w r . _ ...... KATHREIN ANTENNA 800-10270 01076270 Q' 74.0806 Cohen! 10010770 es•msem•Alsanr "TM -38` S CMCILLII :1:66.1 13111 P,l DATE /26/1, 6/3/11 1:5110 101 CCI YOOILCI 110 142829 11 .!.. 1,11'01,00 161 ORS � 1 Maximize Comm. � Group, Inc. 351 POMONA 11040 .291L 100 CORONA, CA 92062 O1rICC (909) 760 -2170 FAX (9094 992 -3613 [ 100 OrXIFR AN' Stagg 250 .A ceneneaIIIOXC0 FAIILL, WA 93100 1 TM - 38 500 0040 A 0DDRCSS DLSC91O1101 70 02/1 CI6 RRQCAIIDR IRI(CUTA IfIWORK NOV 38 512021 iS mO 09119 CI UMW 6 NI 4 1CuCCIIIA CA 92592 Y'LLI 11110. \ MFN ij `t:'CII'CAP.( `d J J J 01114.■ Or• 14 0.10'61 ' 111 1 or V 1.1 11 I,UVf66R A:4.i, T3 2 \.YICINITY MAP SITE PHOTO - VIEW 2 — ADETWTE PHOTO - WEWT _FIE1 ■. 33 51913 142829 114( 1/113/11, WV' W V: 3, RON1V. elk .• 1:110(31L, —ammo n, Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. J . '1040 SJ3( IGO COMA*. CA 9:9391 0 (909) 7335-3 r la (9'39) 991-M13 1 WIG 0CXTER ,, 4. 5,03E 150 5LA1 WA 99109 "own cArneo>l•e corn SlIt. WYE 31 ADONESS KEW NE1WORK ItIi. 33 10/49, 91991 1111) Trurox. CA 92592 3393 TV —..,8 'TT. M910', .4 cm) ur •' .4 • P1 9C913103 2 'MAO 0, c rtZT;Teilnal 137CAVIfi 0 01.00 ,ITAi,i Jsab 3150 44 9.18 0, t I041.3 414 4444 01 4t41 A.,,AV‘L 1.■51. ACGNI ,MAYIk .1:4 6 401 WS:I.-Wilt 38 lL1fl1411004 JUR (34034*414 CONIAKICIA 94341 IArt, 03 4-34134404003481 1304500: 10 1394(0 AO OS. V., 1 so. CR hU 6•1 4100411 in 0011110 00M141 .0441.4, urus 3.60. ■.rrr MD MI (..3 ...GO, CS AIWA CC '4= / • 4 .07 0 fl ••••• ••■ 9 4 1004, st ., . 1/4:04t4s,c a,Zw A l r i.Luu s t , 14— Know wises below. Calibefore you dig. SITE PLAN \ TM-38 C) 11 85018 - • ENLARGED r2 4 NOF?i ,411 ,, Il1 \14411l'4131 (KM 111.V01ION 41 ■ 0311020tet. 2' 142829 oe Maximize Comm. .0 Group, Inc. 93,-311, to , I 9).. I M 38 7370 SAM' k (01:111[5! N! CIO( liOIX rt.:waits ,itets 4..044, TiVICOLA LA 9/594 4,34941; Al NI I t. 2 NOflCE ...sr.: • • /IVO ItO. • c•fr•CarIE t:Off \%.„19ORTHWEST ELE ON r 1. Woof* vi IMP moo oomo. KO.Num /Aso ms. noo.00r «.i;/ pc* - -"wco.o — • IMT 2 NORTHEAST ELEVATION .sr COIOCRLIE SIPECt i.GoT AXE "'"V 1 151 .:.-74b ViMig415 — 1 1 - M-38 0 SW:M1 tom 1/4/11 PROP C! !■0 142829 YLSC0O110/1 lAtO [ 6 gilk% Maximize COMM. 'i Group, Inc. •Oecio. CA 12082 ■ritc.. (OM IM ' AX ( 1 1,1.1 '10 Wait f. 0411 70 :t ,401711. 00 00100 • comnmolle coo C N CO DRAW rCaO 0 1 MO 1 L. a ly ..11 i - .4 , 4N 4 — – Anna; A2 2 1 00. TM 38 001 0 ADM( SS: ! [IC CIA NOOK IlCL i A , 00 0111000, 00:v10-1x 0 0 1,.0100 A 4 O2002 177.4555=7 SOUTHEYEEVA11OW IVI&J 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 111 1 011.• VXON 1.29 Wag 1009994 (.• .400.1 .07..0)11 32' COhYRCIC 519010 110717 BOAL 4044,4 0 .049151i Aut as non 090 1977 .1.0..4 1 9410 IMAM 72991 «48 - • _91 " go 22:11 :0(9 1/20/1 6/7/11 117%. R444400, Po, to, L I i 41 145. 1 (0 142829 1,17•4Arn 41 4111 Maximize Comm. ] Group, Inc. 15 001410144 ROAD 5 100 C2,04,494 CA 92882 (1 (9091 786 ■21 9 .144. (9: 992- 1111 .00 0(01017 000, 69400 230 'Mkt, 44l4 98109 Av•,ctonAcc59: FAA ( , FLY MIL '. liVAl2.,AL 0,5 BY 1*(10 BY. 6797112A0 0 ' (4 58(t/ 4c1014 A3 T g11 NO7 TM - 38 111011CSS 1 ViCUIA *TAM lat M(0 91 (A 11) 140099 (NANO 541 10912009 CA 92592 PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0109, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NOTE TM -13) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 202' SOUTHWEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF CAMINO ROMO Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 19, 2011, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0109, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0109 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0109, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0109, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Rancho Vista Road, approximately 202' southwest of the centerline of Camino Romo, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 6 day of July, 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20 day of July, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0109 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -13) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Rancho Vista Road, approximately 202' southwest of the centerline of Camino Romo Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0114, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -20) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF MORAGA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 310' SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD. Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 19, 2011, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0114, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0114 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0114, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0114, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Moraga Road, approximately 310' south of Rancho California Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20 day of July 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20 day of July 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0114 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -20) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Moraga Road, approximately 310' south of Rancho California Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0118, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -26) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF LA SERENA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 195' SOUTH OF CALLE PINA COLADA. Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 19, 2011, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0118, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0118 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0118 a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0118 a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the southeast side of La Serena Way, approximately 195 feet south of Calle Pina Colada, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20 day of July 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20 day of July, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0118 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -26) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the southeast side of La Serena Way, approximately 195' southeast of Calle Pina Colada. Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0119, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -28) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LEENA WAY, DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM LUCCA WAY. Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 19, 2011, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0119 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Leena Way, directly across from Lucca Way, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20 day of July, 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20 day of July 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0119 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -28) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Leona Way, directly across from Lucca Way. Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0121, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -32) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NICOLAS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 620' EAST OF WINCHESTER ROAD. Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 19, 2011, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0121, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0121 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007787.doc The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0121, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007787.doc a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0121, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Nicolas Road, approximately 620 feet east of Winchester Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. C:\Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter'temp11007787.doc Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11007787.doc Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0121 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -32) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Nicolas Road, approximately 620' east of Winchester Road. PL -1. General Requirements EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0124, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -37) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 185' WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF YNEZ ROAD Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 19, 2011, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0124, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0124 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code, D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0124, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0124, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 185' west of the centerline of Ynez Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20 day of July, 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20 day of July, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0124 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -37) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road approximately 185' west of the centerline of Ynez Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0125, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -38) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ZEVO DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 125' WEST OF DIAZ ROAD Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 19, 2011, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0125, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0125 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code, D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0125, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0125, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Zevo Drive, approximately 125' west of Diaz Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20 day of July, 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20 day of July, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0125 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -38) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Zevo Drive, approximately 125' west of Diaz Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: July 20, 2011 Expiration Date: July 20, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT: NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project APPLICANT: Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle LOCATION: The Project includes the installation of 39 DAS nodes within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way, County of Riverside DESCRIPTION: NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (DAS) to provide wireless telecommunication services to multiple carriers. NewPath proposes to develop a 39 -node DAS throughout the publicly owned City right -of -way (see map on back side of this Notice). The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called "nodes." Each node consists of antenna rays constructed within or on a new slim line monopole camouflaged as a new street light, or located on an existing utility pole. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the Planning Commission intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the project design and /or the Mitigation Monitoring Program will be included as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project, which is available for review at City Hall. The Comment Period for this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is February 14, 2011 to March 15, 2011. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033. City Hall is located at 41000 Main Street. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through: The Local Newspaper [Posting the Site Notice to Adjacent Property Owners If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact Matthew D. Peters, AICP at (951) 694 -6408. Prepared by: '+n�h � �k550(.■ °C. (tAw -. (Signature) (Title) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Matthew D. Peters, AICP (951) 694 -6408 Project Location The Project includes the installation of a 39 -node wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way, County of Riverside (see attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan for locations) Project Sponsor's Name and Address Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath c/o Crown Castle USA Maximize Communications Group, Inc. 1351 Pomona Rd., Suite 110 Corona, CA 92882 NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle USA 1100 Dexter Ave., Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98109 General Plan Designation NA (Not Applicable) — all antennas will be located on new street lights or existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. NA (Not Applicable)— all antennas will be located on new street lights or existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right - of -way. Zoning Description of Project NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS ") to provide wireless telecommunication services. The proposed DAS network is a low profile system capable of delivering wireless telecommunications service to customers of multiple carriers such as AT &T, Verizon, Sprint, and MetroPCS. The proposed network initially will supply the infrastructure for NewPath's anchor tenant, MetroPCS. The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called, "nodes," which receive an optical signal from a central hub and distribute the signal in the form of Radio Frequency (RF) transmissions. For this Project, the hub is outside the City's boundaries (as are three other nodes, one in the County of Riverside and two in the City of Murrieta). Within the City of Temecula, the proposed network consists only of the antenna nodes. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of -way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 1 Each node consists either of antenna arrays constructed within or on a slim -line monopole designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right -of -way, or antenna arrays fixed to existing utility poles owned by the Joint Pole Committee ( "JPC "). Each facility generally features a 53.74 -inch Kathrein Tri- sector antenna within a flush- mounted housing (for new poles) or three Kathrein antennas mounted to existing JPC utility poles. Either configuration also will feature one or more Flex Wave Prisms or similar "fiber repeaters" mounted to either the new street light or the existing JPC utility pole. The fiber repeater converts digitalized spectrum received from the hub into RF signals emitted from the antenna array. Where the new node is proposed for an existing JPC pole, the facility also features a ground mounted meter pedestal. The Project involves the installation of both aerial fiber -optic cable on existing wood utility and newly installed street lights, and underground fiber -optic cable installed within newly installed and existing poly vinyl chloride (PVC) conduit in previously disturbed rights of way. The newly installed fiber -optic cable would connect 39 distributed antenna system nodes and ancillary optical conversion and power equipment also attached to the same utility poles within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way. Another three will be installed outside the City limits; two in the City of Murrieta and one in the County of Riverside. The entire network will be connected to a newly installed fiber -optic base station hub. Construction of the proposed DAS Project will consist specifically of the following: • Installation by NewPath of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed as street lights; • Installation of 39 DAS nodes each containing either: one (1) tri- sector pipe antenna, three (3) antennae insiode radomes, or between three (3) and six (6) panel antennas installed on the utility pole; • Installation of fiber -optic equipment (i.e. optical conversion equipment, signal regeneration equipment, switching equipment, etc...) mounted on existing wood and newly - installed street lights; • Installation of 4 -inch Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) conduit; • Aerial installation of fiber -optic cable onto existing or new wood and street lights; • Underground installation of fiber -optic cable into existing and newly installed conduit; • Underground connection of network to one (1) hub facility to be installed inside an existing public storage facility located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Rd.; • Installation of pull boxes and hand holes; and • Splicing of fiber -optic cable into facilities. The location of the proposed Project is illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan, and each location is further described on a corresponding and attached spreadsheet. Engineering drawings for a new street light and co- location on an G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 2 G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 3 existing utility are also attached. Construction is expected to last approximately 120 days and will consist of two (2) aerial crews and two (2) underground crews working simultaneously to complete construction of the proposed Project. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The Project proposes to develop a 39 -node DAS network throughout the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way adjacent to various commercial and residential zones Other public agencies whose approval is required None G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Noise Population and Housing Biological Resources Greenhouse Gas Emissions Public Services Recreation Cultural Resources Transportation and Traffic Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use and Planning Determination (To be completed by the None lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have be a significant effect in this case because revisions the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE a significant effect on the environment, there will not in the project have been made by or agreed to by DECLARATION will be prepared. a significant effect on the environment, and an I find that the proposed project MAY have ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, imposed upon the proposed project, nothin• further a significant effect on the environment, because all adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to including revisions or mitigation measures that are is required. Signature Printed Name Date For fd. In, a6ll G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 4 4- Y 4-- L L L CIA OA CLO J J J 4-- 4- a) v a) Q v v v >- rn r/) r/) CL) 3 3 3 o v v a) a z z z 0 y ro 0 J cc ro 0 t 0 0 a) 0 0 u 0 L t 0 O m "O cc r0 L as 00 0 O a, uJ w 0 cc ro 0 r0 O V) 0) L 7 0 L!1 CO cc ro 0 L r0 2 4- O a) N N 0) L 7 0 rn U 0 ro E O 0 U r0 a CO r0 ro E 0 (I) N 4- a) 0 0 ro 0 0 O c E r0 V 0 N a) ro coo a L U c 00 CC 0 0 0 L 7 O rn L 0.0 00 J J Q) a) L_ 0) 4- +., N In CI) v Z z O CC CU 00 N - Cr) CU 7 m 0 W Zr) (NI Ln to 0 0 ro c U 0) E aJ F- O a) N L 7 0 CL L U CO CC > 4-- 0 0 U 0 L t 0 ro C r1) r-1 r o rl ro ro L 0 dJ 0 a) 'a N ro CL) L 0 z ci N m Lr) N Ol ri O O O O '71 m H H H H H H H N 4--0 Y 4-+ 4- L L L L L • J J J J 4-, 4--, 4-, 4--+ (1) v 0) v 0) CU 0) y+ N 4- +, 4--. rn V') CO N l/) CI) 0)) aa)) v v Z z z z z r0 O t 0 U J V 0 Ln m m .-1 >2 r0 r0 3 O m v 3 O to a) c c 3 V) J U 0 z Ln 0 r-1 ai c r0 J a) CU N w r0 0 0 3 0 -a ro 0) 2 -J V 0 T.0 ro L r0 0 CU ` 0 U w 0 CC C - o 0 0 -J 0 lh O 0 0 O r CC C O U ro ro 0 0 7 - J 0 w 1.01 >- ro ro a) - J z LO N 00 N cr 00 O O O L- 4 c-1 N H H H H H H H a) ro c c w r0 0 J 0 '.0 l0 (NI r0 0 r0 c z t 7 0 U 0) co r0 J U 0 z oo (.0 c 0 V z ro v 0 C7 0 v d J V 0 4 O r0 0 cc to 0 L U c t0 CC w CI) v 0 0 0_ 0 Q Q 0 0 00 CIO +-, 4-0 c c +., CIO 00 .L0 U 00 J J n 7) J w w a) a) 0 0 a) N L L N 0) 3 ° 0) z z ¢ ¢ z r0 0 CC 0) 00 V) V) "0 a) a) CO 4- 0 N 0 O N m r0 c 0 U 0 L U ro 4- 0 rn w (/) cc (o L ro ,ED ro 2 V 0 w 0 0 ILO CC 0) a) 0 C 4- 0 N c O 00 ro a) ro V J U O rn l0 r0' c r0 - J a) 0 r0 0 c a H H H H H H H U a, co L 0) 1— T V) E O 4- 0 U (0 0 cc O U c 0) S 0 O v) z aJ • L (0 E O J (o 0 a (o 0 cc co 0 L U c (o cc 0 N a) 0 D_ CL 00 ,., 4-+ C L -C . •� J J X 0) 4-, w 0) v O V) V) L 3 3 0 Z Z Q a co 0 cc (0 c 0 4- v 0 L) (o cc 0 V) O a N O CC (0 00 co O V) w O (../) aJ (0 E U (o -o c 0) 0 w O m a (0 O cc (0 1 (0 00 (0 Z a (0 0 (0 (o 00 (0 0 in Vt (0 O cc (0 O (0 0 0 L U co cc V) Z 4- 4., L L . • J J 4 +-, ✓ 0) 0) 0) • N 3 3 CU CU Z Z T as (0 C a) (o J 0 w l!) V) a CC T c aJ (0 a) C 0) (7 (0 U c0 (0 C a) 0 O 0 m a (D 1 (0 000 (o (7 Z CO 01 O N m (Ns N N N N Gf 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L L G L 2 L L G H F- F- H H H L 0D 0 a) 4- V) 0) Z (f) (0 a (o O 0 (o C a 0) U 0 w O Ol T (o n3 (0 c 0) L v V) (o c 0) 0) V) J V) 0 CL no c �--I x w O L ro U a co 0 (o 4- i 0D 0 0 Z O O N a (0 (0 c v aJ V) (0 -J (17 w v 0 a a O O -o a, c O 0 0 t u_ a, 0 D_ - o O 0 rci U L O 0 co > 0 c O 0 CU a c ( a cc T CC a) V) v) a) 0 a 0 OD c X w 0 U aJ O L LD LC) 0 m 0 O O O (0 c a) 4- a) 0 (0 7 c v V) (1) 4- 00 • J v 0) v Z a O 0 a c CU 4- ro -o cc c a) co L v c v l7 V) Z L 00 0) aJ V) v Z Vf (D I■ 01 0 r-I N N N N m m m I I I I I I I L 2 ` 2 ` G L G 2 L H r L I— I H H 4- 4- _C ..0 -C L 0D 0D 00 00 J J J J 4-+ 4- +J 1 . 1 ) ( 1 ) ( 1 ) a ) a) a) a) v L L L L • 4- 4- 4- N V) V) V) cu CD CU Z Z Z Z a 0` (0 (o 00 ( (0 0 0 0 ut O La L a) 4- a) L U C V) Z 0 a) O CU N 0 W 00 '-4 a (0 0 0_' co 0 V) v) LC) n oO m m m S I s I G 2 G co 0 a) a) 0 a) V) v L U c a) O OD C O O 9 • O X 0 a. to n ▪ (o ( 1 c a) f0 E u V1 f0 \ a Z a) (0 0 m _ m (o S I L Q O O O 0 o 0 O cr ui Ln 0) 0A co O 0 X 0 O_ Q (0 C 0` -o C O 0 00 C X W c 0 N a) a) 0o (0 0 O X 0 Q O_ (0 a C 0 0D a) a c t U c a) - o a) O Q O 0 O O O cis m 1 5 s O to 0 { 11' / , ) § ! j ■ / c P 1! E | - § k 2 | 1 ® $ I | "I ( t t 20 1041 ¢` $ h • k| { k i / / ts \ \ , E 0 0 / 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: See the attached maps and exhibits included in the Project description for more information on the location and design of the DAS nodes. 1.a.b: No Impact: As indicated in the General Plan (Figure CD -1), The Project and the location of the nodes will not have an effect on a scenic vista or substantially damage any scenic resources as they are all located in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way adjacent to commercial or residential areas. 1.c. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The installation of aerial cable on existing poles would further add to the number of cables attached to the poles. These would be attached near phone and cable TV cables and would incrementally add to the visual impact of these structures. This additional impact would constitute a less- than - significant impact due to the presence of other cables on the poles. However, the proposed Project includes the installation of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed to match existing street lights located throughout the City right -of -way and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. The street light design will help the antennas blend in with the surrounding environment. In some cases, street lights may not blend in a rural area where no street lights exist. In order to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area, the following mitigation is required to ensure a less than significant visual and aesthetic impact: Mitigation Measure A -1. New slim -line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street light pole to match existing street lights in the right -of -way. If a new street light is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim -line monopole with concrete street light base — minus the "cobra" light arm may be acceptable. In rural areas, where street lights don't exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete "street light" type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights 1.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance 655). Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Lighting issues are addressed during the City's plan review and inspection process. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 5 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X X b c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use X X d e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? X Comments: 2.a. No Impact: The project has been or would be located entirely within the existing publicly owned right - of -way along existing roadways and within generally urban and residentially developed areas. No portion of the project site or adjacent areas is considered to be Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. 2.b. No Impact: The project is located within a publicly owned right -of -way and is not zoned for agricultural use or under a Williamson Act Contract. 2.c.d.e. No Impact: The project is in a publicly owned right -of -way that is not used or zoned for agriculture, timberland or forest uses. There would be no conversion of land from forest or farmland since none exists. G: \PLANNING \2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 6 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated X X X X Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? b c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: Construction of the Project will consist of four (4) work crews (two [2] aerial crews and two [2] underground crew) who will work simultaneously until completion. Each work crew will install all described components of the Project as they progress along the Project alignment. A typical underground crew will consist of the following: 1 backhoe 1 HDD bore machine 3 standard pickup trucks 1 dump truck 2 hand -held vibratory compactors 1 saw cutter 1 crane The following labor crew will be required: 1 foreman, 2 operators, 3 laborers (including flagmen), and 1 inspector. A typical aerial cable placing crew will consist of the following equipment: 2 aerial cable - placing vehicles 1 cable reel trailer 1 supply and equipment truck 1 pickup truck A typical aerial crew will consist of an aerial cable - placing vehicle with a driver, an in- bucket operator and one or two flagmen, depending on traffic conditions. 3.a. -d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project does not include development of new homes or businesses and, therefore, would not induce population growth in the South Coast Air Basin. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 7 Emissions during construction would result in minimal emissions from occasional vehicle trips to maintain the project facilities. Short-term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction would be less than significant through the implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM), as well as the following mitigation: Mitigation Measures Air Quality 1: • Minimize and disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion • Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials. 3.e. Less Than Significant: The construction of the project could generate fumes from the operation of construction equipment and from asphalt paving, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposurtes would be short term and /or transient since they would occur during the construction phase only. Furhtermore, SCAQMD rules restrict VOC content (the source of odor - causing compounds) in asphalt and paints. The project would utilize typical construction techniques in compliance with SCAQMD rules. As such, project construction would not cause an odor nuisance, and odor impacts would be less than significant. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 8 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Comments: 4.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will be constructed within the publicly owned right -of -way, which consists of primarily paved surfaces with no riparian habitat or habitat for sensitive species, wetlands, vernal pools, or marshes. No tree removal is anticipated and no migratory routes or wildlife corridors have been identified. There may be a potential for indirect impact to habitat from construction runoff or release of hazardous substances from construction. However, these potential impacts are discussed under Section 8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and are reduced to level that is less than significant through the implementation of an existing Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SPCP). 4.e. -f. No Impact: The project would not result in tree removal or impacts to biological resources. The project site is not located within a habitat conservation area; therefore no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 9 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? X c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: 5.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is to be constructed in the publicly owned right - of -way, which has been previously disturbed by grading, roadway, and sidewalk construction. It is not likely that intact resources would still exist in most of the project area; however, there is a potential that resources could be present in less disturbed areas. As a result, the following standard note shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 10 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of Toss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Comments: 6.a.i., ii., iii. Less Than Significant Impact: The Elsinore Fault traverses the City of Temecula and is located in an area of high seismic activity and faulting. In addition, the project area may be subject to severe ground shaking from a seismic event since the area also has high liquefaction potential. The project will be designed to comply with the City's seismic design standards for utilities, resulting in a Tess than significant impact. 6.a.iv. No impact: While the City of Temecula has rolling hills and areas of steep topography, the individual project sites for each node within the publicly owned right -of way are relatively flat and not prone to landslides. No impact would occur. 6.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The erosion hazard of the soils in most of the project area is slight. In addition, much of the area in the public right -of way where the nodes will be installed include turf. Erosion controls will be used where necessary along the proposed project route. The most likely situations for the use of controls will be when construction activities occur near storm drains and in landscaped areas where the slope of hillsides is steep. Control measures that may be used include silt fence, certified weed -free straw wattles and straw bales, and other control measures as necessary. Each node will require an encroachment permit to be issued by the Department of Public Works resulting in a less than significant impact. 6.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: As described above, the area is prone to liquefaction, and areas with expansive soils. The impact is considered less than significant as each node will be reviewed by the Department of Building and Safety for compliance with seismic design standards for utilities. G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 11 6.e. No Impact: Septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems are not a part of the project. No impact would occur. G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 12 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Comments: 7.a.b. No Impact: The proposed Project involves the installation of new concrete street light poles and new antennas on existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. The new and existing poles will not generate noise or greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, no impacts will occur. G:\PLANNING12010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 13 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Comments: 8.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activities have the potential to release three primary types of materials into the environment: petroleum based products used in construction equipment, bentonite slurry from boring operations, and runoff of silt -laden water from the construction site. To reduce the potential for release of these materials and to minimize the impacts associated with an inadvertent spill, NewPath will implement an existing Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SPCP). This plan will evaluate potential spoil scenarios, identify avoidance and prevention measures, and identify response actions to such situations in order to reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. 8.e. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The City's GIS mapping system identifies portions of the project area as being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. The project is subject to review and comment by the Riverside Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). The City of Temecula will require the project to be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to issuance of any permits. As previously provided for other projects in Airport Zones in the City of Temecula, the following standard mitigation measures will be required: G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 14 Mitigation Measure Haz 1: The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. 8.f. No Impact: The Project is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 8.g. Less Than Significant Impact: Access along project area roadways during construction is expected to be maintained so that residents living in the vicinity are not significantly impacted by the project. Due to the temporary nature of the project and the City's requirement for a Traffic Control Plan, the impacts would be less than significant. 8.h. Less Than Significant Impact: The project area is within an urbanized area and is not prone to wildfires. The impact is less than significant. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 15 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? Y. X d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f Require the preparation of a project- specific WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X • Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: Erosion controls as required by the City's Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be used where necessary along the proposed Project route. The most likely situation for use of these controls will be when construction activities occur near storm drains and in landscaped areas where the slope of hillsides is steep. Examples of control measures that may be used include silt fence, certified weed - free straw wattles an straw bales, and other control measures as necessary resulting in a less than significant impact. 9.b. No Impact: The project involves the installation of new street light poles and antennas in the public right -of -way. Groundwater will not be impacted. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 16 9.c.d. No Impact: The project would involve minor construction within the publicly owned right -of -way. The project will not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding. No alteration of the course of a stream or river would occur and no impact would occur. 9.e. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not be adding a significant amount of impervious area to the project area, since such facilities consist of a vertical pole and are constructed adjacent to previously paved areas. 9.f. No Impact: The project would not require the preparation of a WQMP. Thus, no impacts would occur. 9.g. No Impact: The project does not involve placement of housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map, because the project does not include any residential within those zones. No impact would occur. 9.h. No Impact: Any structures proposed to be placed within a 100 -year flood zone will be small and limited to poles, aboveground aerial cables, and underground cables. These will not impede or redirect flows. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 9.i. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, since this is a utility project in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. The impact is considered less than significant. 9.j. No Impact: No portion of the project is subjected to seiche, tsunami or mudlfow. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 17 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Physically divide an established community? Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X X b c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Comments: 10.a. No Impact: Installation of the DAS Network entirely within the City owned public right -of -way will not divide an established community. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 10.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The project has been reviewed by the City's Development Review Committee (DRC) for consistency with all applicable plans, policies and regulations, including the City's Telecommunications Ordinance, to ensure the project will have a less than significant impact. 10.c. No Impact: None of the Project components are located on lands covered by a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Therefore, no impacts would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 18 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Comments: 11.a.b. No Impact: According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the zoning classification of MRZ -3a has been applied by the State. MRZ -3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant economic value, based on available data. In addition, the proposed project is to be constructed in the publicly owned right -of -way, which has been previously disturbed by grading, roadway, and sidewalk construction that will not impact any mineral resources. Thus, no impact will occur. G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 19 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Comments: 12.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed Project will increase noise levels only during construction, and only between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday and 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Saturday (No Sundays) as required by City Ordinance 9.20.060.D. No increase in noise levels will occur from the operational phase of the Project because noise- producing equipment will not be part of the Project. The noise impacts associated with the proposed Project are expected to occur in the immediate vicinity of construction equipment. The increased noise levels will occur during mostly daylight hours, when average noise levels from vehicular traffic are generally the highest. In addition, the noise increase will not affect any one location for an extended period of time. The noise generated from construction activities would be short term in duration and considered Tess than significant. 12.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activity associated with the proposed project would not result in excessive ground -borne noise or perceptive vibration. Removal of pavement and drilling for new poles would create short term, low levels of ground -borne noise and vibrations. No high vibration producing activities such as pile driving, are proposed. Once construction is complete, the proposed project is not expected to generate vibration or noise. Therefore, impacts associated with construction- related noise and vibrations are considered less than significant. 12.c. No Impact: Once constructed, the DAS system does not produce noise, and therefore, would create no permanent increase in ambient noise levels. Therefore, no impact would occur. 12.d. Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in response (a) above, there would be a short term increase in noise levels during construction; however, due to the short duration and locations, the impacts are considered Tess than significant. G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 20 12.e. Less Than Significant Impact: This is not a residential or commercial development Project and the nodes are not staffed. Thus, the Project will not result in residents or employees being subjected to airport noise. No impacts will occur. 12.f. No Impact: The project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 21 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: 13.a. No Impact: The proposed project would not result in substantial population growth in the area because no new homes or businesses are proposed, and no infrastructure related to population growth is proposed. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 13.b. No Impact: No housing would be displaced by the proposed project and no impact would occur. 13.c. No Impact: The project would not displace people or housing, or require replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 22 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Comments: 14.a. No Impact: The project involves the installation of new concrete steel light poles or co- location of antenna facilities on an existing pole in the city owned public right -of -way. The project will not introduce any new fire hazards or generate population growth that would require an increase in fire or police protection services. The project would not result in an increase of population or housing in the project area. Therefore no new demand on local schools, parks or public facilities would occur. G: \PLANNING120101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 23 15. RECREATION. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 15.a. No Impact: The project would not result in an increase of population, which would increase the use of existing parks or other recreation facilities. Therefore. No impacts would occur. 15.b. No Impact: The proposed project does not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreation facilities. Therefore, no impacts would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 24 16. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? X b Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X X e Result in inadequate emergency access? f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Comments: 16.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would be constructed over time along roadways in the City of Temecula, ranging from major roadways to residential streets. It is expected that there will be short-term construction related impacts associated with the project. As a result, the Department of Public Works will require an encroachment permit, traffic control plan, and right -of way agreement to address the impacts and reduce them to a level of less than significant impact. 16.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Due to the low number of construction vehicles associated with two aerial crews and two underground work crews required by the proposed project, no changes in the level of service are anticipated. As mentioned above, short-term construction related impacts will be reduce to a level of Tess than significant through Public Works requirements for an encroachment permit, traffic control plan, and right -of way agreement. 16.c. No Impact: Construction and operational traffic associated with the proposed project is not expected to result in a change in air traffic patterns, including an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks given that the new steel light poles will be less than 40 feet high or the new antennas will be co- located on existing utility poles in the city owned public right -of -way. _16.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would result in trenching and laying of conduit, construction of new light poles, and aerial and underground installation of fiber optic cable, and installation of pull boxes and hand holes. This would result in potential lane closures, loss of access, and short-term traffic congestion. G:\PLANNING\20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 25 Again, the City will require an encroachment permit and traffic control plan to reduce the impacts to a level of less than significant. 16.e.f. No Impact: The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed project and have determined that that there will be no significant impacts to emergency access. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted plans, policies or programs regarding public transit, bicycle or pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G: \PLANNING12010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 26 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 17.a. No Impact: The project is within the publicly owned right -of -way in developed areas within the City of Temecula, which includes streets, curb, gutter, storm drain, sewer drain, and existing utility lines, such as power lines, telephone lines and cable television lines. The project would not generate a demand for water or wastewater treatment, and thus would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.b. No Impact: The project would not require or result in the expansion or construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.c. No Impact: During the construction of the proposed project, all ground disturbances would be limited to the previously developed, and publicly owned right -of way. To avoid impacts to the existing stormwater system, the applicant is planning to tunnel or bore under existing curbs and gutters where the project proposes to install underground fiber optic communication lines. Therefore, the project would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, and no impacts would occur. 17.d.e. No Impact: The project would not generate a demand for water or wastewater treatment. Therefore, the project would not cause a violation in wastewater treatment requirements, or require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.f.g No Impact: The project will generate a minimal amount of solid waste during construction. The project will include a condition of approval requiring the developer to contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 27 construction debris. The amount of solid waste generated by the project would not be substantial or interfere with the sufficient permitted capacity of nearby landfills and there would be no impact. G:IPLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 28 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X X No Impact a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? b c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: 18.a. Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in the sections above, the project would involve the construction of a utility system and would not significantly impact fish or wildlife resources, nor impact rare, threatened or endangered species. The proposed project with the inclusion of standard conditions of approval and permitting process would not significantly impact cultural or biological resources. 18.b. Less Than Significant Impact: No significant cumulative impacts have been identified with the implementation of the proposed project. 18.c. Less Than Significant Impact: No substantial environmental effects that would cause adverse effects on human beings have been identified. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 29 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. 19 a. The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System Map Sets were used as referenced source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street in Temecula. The Geographic Information System Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.orq. 19 b. There were no impacts that were previously addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis. 19 c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. City of Temecula Development Code 5. Supplemental Information provided by NewPath c/o Crown Castle as required by the City's Telecommunication Ordinance and Conditional Use Permit applications G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 30 Mitigation Monitoring Program NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project AESTHETICS General Impact: Mitigation Measures Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: AIR QUALITY General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Potentially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings New slim -line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street light pole to match existing street lights in the right -of -way. If a new street light is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim -line monopole with concrete street Tight base — minus the "cobra" light arm may be acceptable. In rural areas, where street lights don't exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete "street light" type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the planning application review and plan check process. Prior to issuance of a building permit Planning Department Short -term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction Implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM) • Minimize land disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: HAZARDS General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Planning staff will mitigation measure review and grading process. Prior to issuance construction Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department • Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials. verify compliance with the above as part of the planning application plan /encroachment permit plan check of associated permits and during Planning and Public Works Departments Directly or indirectly exposing people or structures to potential adverse effects from being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the building and grading plan check review process. Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc June 6, 2011 City of Temecula Community Development P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Attention: Honorable Members of City Council, Temecula Planning Commissioners Subject: PA11 -0112 JUN 062011 We strongly oppose the Applicant's Conditional Use Permit to install a new 40 foot high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -18) on the northwest side of Southern Cross Road, across from Sky Terrace Drive for the following reasons: According to Temecula Municipal Code, Title 17 Zoning, Chapter 17.40 Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance , 17.40.020 General requirements for all telecommunications facilities and antennas. H. Shall not be installed in any location where it could impede normal vehicular or pedestrian circulation We oppose the proposed location which will be detrimental to our health and for the health of future generations, as a result will impede the circulation of pedestrian movement. In regards to Safety. The pedestrian safety will be in jeopardy. As a result of the proposed Tower the pedestrians will not use the sidewalk instead they will be forced to walk on the opposite side of the street where there is no sidewalk, therefore, their lives will be in danger. The proposed tower will have an adverse impact of the general well -being of our community. We strongly urge the City Council to obtain other locations as an alternate and better site from the applicant. Southern Cross Road. and Sky Terrace Drive in Temecula, Ca. is not the "Best Location" in this residential community. We moved here from Simi Valley, California to live in a residential community that will be healthful to us and for future generations and not be detrimental to our health. In regards to notification, we did not have notice in regards to the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The notice went to adjacent property owners and was posted in the newspaper as stated, however, we were unaware of both of these notices in order to make comment at the appropriate time. Sincerely, rju. 'S Toula Tsafos Home Owner 30591 Southern Cross Road Temecula, CA 92592 To the Honorable Members of the Temecula City Council and Planning Commission 06 -06 -2011 We are Temecula homeowners residing on Southern Cross near the location where Crown Castle has applied to install a 40 foot concrete cellular telephone tower. I would respectfully request that the Crown Castle application to install the tower on Southern Cross be denied for the reasons set forth below. Eight years ago we moved to our home on Southern Cross from Escondido California. We moved to Temecula, and in particular to our present home, because we loved the view and because we believed that our home was a sound investment. Now, we have learned that Crown Castle has applied for a permit to install a 40 foot concrete cellular tower that will not only destroy the view that enticed us to buy our home, but may also create health risks which will negatively impact the marketability of our home or injure us in our health. It is clear that there are other locations where the Crown Castle Tower could be placed that would not be nearly as intrusive as the location currently proposed. For example, attached to this letter (Exhibit A) is an aerial photograph of the proposed currently location on Southern Cross which is marked by the letter "A ". Immediately to the east, on the other side of Margarita Street, is a much better location marked on the map with the letter "B ". There are no houses in the immediate vicinity of the water tank. By placing the tower at that location Crown Castle would be in compliance with Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.40.010B and C which requires the city to: "Protect the visual character of the city from potential adverse effects of telecommunications facility development and antenna installation by maintaining architectural and structural integrity and preventing unsightly facilities." (17.40.010B) "Insure against the creation of visual blight within or along the city's scenic corridor and ridgelines." (17.40.010C) In addition to protecting the community from an unsightly cell tower, placing the tower at an alternative location, such as near the water tower east of Margarita, would achieve the goal of co- locating the tower near another tower owned by Crown Castle which is the stated goal of Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.40.010L. Further, locating the tower away from homes, such as at the location of the water tower would help achieve the goal of protecting the residents near the proposed location from exposure to potentially harmful radiation as required by Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.40.010E. Adverse Impact of Tower on Real Estate Value Crown Castle has presented a report claiming that cellular towers do not adversely impact property values. Clearly this report is biased in favor of the telecommunication providers and against the homeowner. This report is contrary to numerous reports published by realtor associations, appraisers and other real estate professionals. A simple search of the internet reveals dozens of articles by various real estate professionals attesting to the negative impact of cell towers on property values. There are a number of reasons cited in the articles the two most significant of which are the unsightly nature of the towers and concerns about health issues arising from emissions from the towers. A simple resolution to the problem of diminished property values from the tower is to place the tower at a location away from homes. The tower does not need to be in the location of the homes and the only apparent reason Crown Castle seeks to install the tower at the Southern Cross site is that Crown Castle has the ability to use this location without paying rent whereas they might have to pay rent at the location of the water tank. Crown Castle should not be permitted to create an eyesore in the Southern Cross vicinity just to avoid a minor rent expense. The burden to the homeowners in the Southern Cross vicinity is substantial in that they will have to face the tower's interference with the aesthetic quality and integrity of their neighborhood. In addition, they will have to live with the uncertainty of the radiation emissions from the tower. For years medical organizations such as the World Health Organization have said that there are no harmful effects from the use of cell phones. Last week the World Health Organization made an about face and said there may be harmful effects from the use of cell phones. We have seen this scenario time and again with products ranging from asbestos, tobacco and nuclear fallout from bomb experiments to thalidomide only to find ourselves today with millions of victims with cancer and birth defects from these products. At one time the US government even encouraged tobacco companies to make filters out of asbestos under the belief that asbestos was harmless and more effective than cotton filters. Whether the health concerns from the towers are real or not, the belief that they are real has a substantial impact on the desirability of homeownership. In California sellers of real estate must provide a transfer disclosure statement and disclose all facts materially affecting the value or desirability of a home. [See Cal. Civ. Code § §1102- 1102.15] This includes a duty to disclose cellular phone towers in the neighborhood. The mere fact that the disclosure appears on a transfer disclosure statement in many instances will cause prospective buyers to forego making an offer on the property. In the same way that the possibility of health problems arising from the radiation emitted from the towers will deter prospective purchasers, the unsightly nature of these 40 foot concrete towers will adversely impact the marketability of the real estate. Southern Cross is a beautiful street with a wide open view of the north side of the street and beautiful houses on the south side of the street. A short distance west of the location of the proposed tower, are additional beautiful houses on the north side of the street. The 40 foot concrete tower will be nothing but an eyesore and will diminish the aesthetic quality of the neighborhood. What will the homeowners on Southern Cross and in the neighborhood receive in exchange for taking on the burden of the tower? They will receive absolutely nothing. They will receive no benefit whatsoever in return for receiving this burden in their neighborhood. There is no Genuine Need to Install the Towers at this Location An important question in the consideration of whether the tower should be installed on Southern Cross is whether the installation is necessary. According to Crown Castle the towers they are installing in Temecula will provide local service only. It will be beneficial for people living and working in Temecula. The reality is that most people who live in Temecula, who work outside of the home, commute to Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange County or San Diego County. One must ask if there is a true need for 35 cellular towers in Temecula that will serve only those who live and work within the city limits. Even if there is an established need for such a tower system in Temecula, there remains a question whether there is truly a need to install the tower on Southern Cross. This would clearly not be the case given that there are other locations away from the homes on Southern Cross where the tower could be installed. I have proposed only one such location which is the location of the water tank where Crown Castle already has a tower for a different system. It only makes sense that the tower proposed for Southern Cross would be placed at the location of the water tank or at another location not within the proximity of homes. Conclusion In this letter I have only addressed the more significant problems that arise from the placement of the tower on Southern Cross though others exist. It is clear that placing this tower at the vicinity of Southern Cross is not in the best interest of the residents on Southern Cross and nearby streets. There is a much Tess intrusive alternative and I respectfully request that this Council deny the application to install the tower on Southern Cross and instruct Crown Castle to present a secondary plan less destructive to the community. RESPECTULLY SUBMITTED NICHOLAS TSINGAS E p,44 BLANCHE TSINGAS Exhibit A b -1 1 0 0 0 3 • 0 • U o a) . o a) cn 3 o a, 0 Q o�° • o = 0 2 �'' ' o 0 as I. ^ n cd 0 0 0 GQ O E t ° 5 0 0 0 o U 0 o L, a' o c! oN to r -o c� `o, . c cp 0 a) cO o p F o e $3 , fa, 0 0 (I) ' � cd 0 0 U U i a -41 o E 0 O N o a' o as .fl 0 o 0 W 0 c (1 " as > 3 }, a) F,, , v L' o d a) O c c LI-4 En +n OA •" 0 +" 0 - cn O .fi .. V 5 4: N a'' g Z 0 1 e ', -o .5 0 ...F., «: U r te - ■ a a) au es I. 0 r 0 al 0 _ at o o .. a ^ 0 Q 1 ., a) „ Q CO 0 a) a) o • (,, Q (1) = • •- c 03 o o .o a a..) v 5 a o 'l7 c� 'CS 0 0 " 0 0 0 0> as 5 1 46 a a 3 ft 4.) o : o o o at a.) 5, V7 tom- 00 Q ■ O — M d' �O ' [- 00 O∎ N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M a.) M tri qii 0 N 00 DATED this 16th day of June, 2011 Susan Jone= MMC NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following Public Hearing will be continued from the Planning Commission meeting of June 15, 2011 to the meeting to be held on July 20, 2011. SUBJECT: Planning Application No. PA11- 0112, a Conditional Use Permit for NeWPathlCrown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -18) in the City of Temecula right- of -wav on the northwest side of Southern Cross Road, across from Sky Terrace Drive, Matt Peters NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Planning Commission meeting of July 20, 2011 will take place at 6:00 PM, at the City of Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, Califomia. All interested persons are invited to attend said Public Hearing to be heard in favor or in opposition to the item, either orally or by written communication to the Planning Commission. C:\Documents and Settings\cheryl.domenoe\.ocal Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook \C1 MJZWI4\continued to July 202011 PA11- 0112.doc NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following Public Hearing was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2011 to the meeting to be held on July 20, 2011. SUBJECT: Planning Application No. PA11-0109. a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath/Crown Castle to install a.new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM-13) in the City of Temecula right-of- way on the east side of Rancho Vista Road, approximately 145' south of the centerline of Paseo Goleta, Matt Peters • NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Planning Commission meeting of July 20, 2011, will take place at 6:00 p.m. at the City of Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street Drive, Temecula, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said Public Hearing to be heard in favor or in opposition to the item, either orally or by written communication to the Director of Planning. DATED this 7'"day of July, 2011 4 Afin Susan W Jones, M ity Clea Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0114 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -20) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Moraga Road, approximately 310' south of Rancho California Road. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers July 20, 2011 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at (951) 694 -6408. G: \PLANNING\2011 \PA11 -0114 NewPath Networks TM -20 CUP \Planning \NOPH PA11- 0114.doc Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0118 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -26) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the southeast side of La Serena Way, approximately 195' south of Calle Pina Colada. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers July 20, 2011 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. G: \PLANNING\2011 \PA11 -0118 NewPath Networks TM -26 CUP \Planning \NOPH PA11- 0118.doc Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA11 -0119 Applicant: Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle Proposal: A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -28) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Leena Way, directly across from Lucca Way. Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Case Planner: Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: July 20, 2011 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. G: \PLANNING\2011 \PA11 -0119 NewPath Networks TM -28 CUP \Planning \NOPH PA11- 0119.doc Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0121 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -32) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Nicolas Road, approximately 620' east of Winchester Road. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers July 20, 2011 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. G: \PLANNING\2011 \PA11 -0121 NewPath Networks TM -32 CUP \ Planning \NOPH PA11- 0121.doc Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Notice of Public Hearing PA11 -0124 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -37) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 185' west of the centerline of Ynez Road. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers July 20, 2011 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. G: \PLANNING\2011 \PA11 -0124 NewPath Networks TM -37 CUP \ Planning \NOPH - PA11- 0124.doc Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PA11 -0125 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -38) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Zevo Drive, approximately 125' west of Diaz Road. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers July 20, 2011 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. G: \PLANNING\2011 \PA11 -0125 NewPath Networks TM -38 CUP \Planning \NOPH - PA11- 0125.doc