Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout062012 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: PUBLIC COMMENTS NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET JUNE 20, 2012 — 6:00 PM Earlene Bundy Commissioner Guerriero Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of June 6, 2012 1 Next in Order: Resolution: 12 -14 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three - minute time limit for individual speakers. All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 Planning Application No. PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -28) in the City of Temecula right -of -way, located on the north side of Leena Way, 155' northeast of Campanula Way, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0119, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH TEXTURED STEEL STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -28) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SUNNY MEADOWS DRIVE, 155' NORTHEAST OF CAMPANULA WAY (APN 959 -203- 024) 3 Planning Application No. PAl2 -0081, a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity to authorize a Type -47 ABC license for Temecula Lanes Bowling Alley, located at 27475 Jefferson Avenue, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAl2 -0081, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY TO AUTHORIZE A TYPE -47 ABC LICENSE FOR TEMECULA LANES BOWLING ALLEY, LOCATED AT 27475 JEFFERSON AVENUE (APN 909 - 240 -002) 2 REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, July 18, 2012, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC - The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 41000 Main Street and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. Additionally, any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commissioners regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review at the locations indicated above. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website atwww.cityoftemecula.orq. 3 PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS RECOMMENDATION: Earlene Bundy 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET JUNE 6, 2012 — 6:00 PM Commissioner Carey Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio 1 Next in Order: Resolution: 12 -13 1.1 Approve the Minutes of May 16, 2012 APPROVED 4- 0 -0 -1; MOTION BY COMMISSION KIGHT, SECOND BY COMMISSION HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO ABSTAINED Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 Planning Application No. PAl2 -0059, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the Wiens Brewing Company (ABC License Type 23 - Small Beer Manufacturer) to open a 947 square foot retail and tasting area located at 27941 Diaz Road, Suite A, Matt Peters APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL Ron Guerriero Chairman PC RESOLUTION NO. 12 -13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAl2 -0059, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR WIENS BREWING COMPANY TO OPERATE A BEER MANUFACTURING FACILITY WITH A 947 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL AND TASTING AREA AT 27941 DIAZ ROAD, SUITE A (APN 921 - 040 -003) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Wednesday, June 20, 2012, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 2 Patrick Richardson Director of Planning and Development DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2012 Matthew D. Peters, AICP, Case Planner RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: Notice of Determination (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) BACKGROUND SUMMARY Planning Application No. PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high textured steel street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -28) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Sunny Meadows Drive, 155' northeast of Campanula Way Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS ") to provide wireless telecommunication services. The proposed DAS network is a low profile system capable of delivering wireless telecommunications service to customers of multiple carriers such as AT &T, Verizon, Sprint, and MetroPCS. The proposed network initially will supply the infrastructure for NewPath's anchor tenant, MetroPCS. The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called, "nodes," which receive an optical signal from a central hub and distribute the signal in the form of Radio Frequency (RF) transmissions. For this Project, three other nodes are located outside the City boundary (one in the County of Riverside and two in the City of Murrieta). Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of -way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. Each node consists either of antenna arrays constructed within or on a slim -line monopole designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right -of -way, or antenna arrays fixed to existing utility poles owned by the Joint Pole Committee ( "JPC "). Each facility generally features a 53.74 -inch Kathrein Tri- sector antenna within a flush- mounted housing (for new poles) or three Kathrein antennas mounted to existing JPC utility poles. Either configuration also will feature one or more Flex Wave Prisms or similar "fiber repeaters" mounted to either the new street light or the existing JPC utility pole. The fiber repeater converts digitalized spectrum received from the hub into RF signals emitted from the antenna array. The Project involves the installation of both aerial fiber -optic cable on existing wood utility poles and newly installed street lights, and underground fiber -optic cable installed within newly installed and existing poly vinyl chloride (PVC) conduit in previously disturbed rights -of -way. 1 The newly installed fiber -optic cable would connect 39 distributed antenna system nodes and ancillary optical conversion and power equipment also attached to the same utility poles within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. The entire network will be connected to a newly installed fiber -optic base station hub. Construction of the proposed DAS Project will consist specifically of the following: • Installation by NewPath of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed as street lights; • Installation of 39 DAS nodes each containing either: one (1) tri- sector pipe antenna, three (3) antennae inside radomes, or between three (3) and six (6) panel antennas installed on the utility pole; • Installation of fiber -optic equipment (i.e. optical conversion equipment, signal regeneration equipment, switching equipment, etc.) mounted on existing wood and newly - installed street lights; • Installation of four -inch Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) conduit; • Aerial installation of fiber -optic cable onto existing or new wood and street lights; • Underground installation of fiber -optic cable into existing and newly installed conduit; • Underground connection of network to one (1) hub facility to be installed inside an existing public storage facility located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Rd.; • Installation of pull boxes and hand holes; and • Splicing of fiber -optic cable into facilities. The location of the proposed Project is illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan. Engineering drawings for a new street light and co- location on an existing utility are also attached. Construction is ongoing and close to completion, except for a few remaining sites. ANALYSIS Given the large size of the overall project, City staff has worked with Crown Castle (formerly NewPath) to break the project down into manageable batches of approximately four to eleven Planning Applications for each hearing. This first batch was approved on March 16, 2011 and included the following seven nodes: TM -01; TM -02; TM -03; TM -05; TM -17; TM -39; and TM -41. Each node in the first batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. The second batch was approved on May 4, 2011 and included the following five nodes: TM -15, TM -21, TM -27, TM -30, and TM -42. Nodes TM -15, TM -27 and TM -30 will include three antennas attached to existing wood utility poles, while the remaining two nodes will be designed as concrete street light poles similar to those approved in batch 1. The third batch was approved on May 18, 2011 and included the following three nodes: TM -9, TM -11, and TM -14. Node TM -18 was continued for redesign due to neighborhood concerns. Of these nodes, three are designed as concrete street light poles similar to those previously approved, and one (TM -14) will be attached to an existing wood utility pole. The fourth batch was approved on June 1, 2011 and included the following six nodes: TM -22, TM -23, TM -24, TM -31, TM -33, and TM -36. Each node in the fourth batch was designed as a 2 concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. The fifth batch was approved on July 6, 2011 and included the following 11 nodes: TM -25, TM- 29, TM -04, TM -06, TM -07, TM -08, TM -10, TM -12, TM -13, TM -16, and TM -19. Each node in the fifth batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. Node TM -13 was continued at the July 6, 2011 Planning Commission hearing to the July 20, 2011 hearing. A neighbor testified that he pulled a building permit for a pool house, which would be within the 75' setback from an antenna to a residence. However, staff found that the permit was for a gunite pool and spa. No plans have been submitted or permits pulled for a pool house. The sixth batch was approved on July 20, 2011 and included the following six nodes (plus two continued from previous meetings): TM -20, TM -26, TM -28, TM -32, TM -37, and TM -38. Each node in the sixth batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. Node TM -13 is discussed above. Node TM -28 was continued off calendar. Node TM -18 was continued at the May 18, 2011 Planning Commission hearing to the July 20, 2011 hearing. However, the applicant requested that TM -18 be continued off calendar to allow time to review an alternative involving locating on an existing wood utility pole. The seventh batch includes only one node: TM -28. This node is designed as a textured steel street light pole to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. Staff and Crown Castle worked with Jim Keen, President of the Paloma Del Sol Homeowner's Association, to locate the pole in an acceptable and mutually beneficial location. The street lights will have the same finish and light arm attachment as a standard Southern California Edison street light. The only minor differences between the poles besides the antenna arrays will be a slightly larger outside diameter (eight inches for standard SCE light pole versus ten inches for Crown Castle), and a taller overall height (32 feet versus approximately 40 feet high). It should be noted that the top of the luminaire or light fixture will be 32 feet for consistency along the street right -of -way. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on June 7, 2012 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on March 16, 2011 and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). 3 FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. The antenna has been located and designed to match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The wireless antenna will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. 4 ATTACHMENTS NewPath /Crown Castle DAS Master Plan Map Vicinity and Aerial Maps Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring Program Notice of Public Hearing 5 NORM t -- M CROWN eITY Of• RIVIi RAIN( COOK IV GF>i c'ea Vasa_ kma) r t wr nirr MINIM - NK MOM wr! 0 NODE LO<AiIo/`lS City of Temecula 0 50 100 200 0 Feat Aerial - March 2010 1 PA11-01191 Ths map was made by the i:ity of Ternecuia Geugraphic tnior nation System. The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsioility for the information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this ntap are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information Syslem and other sources should he queried for the most current information. This map is not for terabit or resale. 1 WI, n10 - ... ...•. 4YLt 70.0 • .. 04471 •. V» - rte soma,/ .:4 tn,..I. '•• ?5515. A • .004 KKem .. K moon zokaa 0190.7198 .. • AU,: •A•4 f ••• AVON •5•. JLSMM Sn MN C9tt 1030 5111JI41✓5m 1470 Olt VW COM Alta ''5 4 110.5 4414 tat 1 . 4 J1 W 6/6 671• ,..42 2. W. 1 14.55.4 2.1 V. SL• - - - •25401..2 M/• LCC.744/ OA.- C.2 0. - r•v r• • (...7+5. M/4 •••7.99 7176 105...•0.7 441 , .1 5 .00 50 x *76* 7WC.AC. a-Vta6 •r-el 56564 m SHEET INDEX - 15.17 1 1'.155.115. Ti I elm o.o T2 T3 5 0241!50(5 _ _ e , •••.0+v.1c .tc•.+t95. Pt 4..0.* Al ...An m 57* A1.1 • A2 .7.x57 MAIM P•5. •L. 645.1015 A3 Al emend .aw0n101r1 AS *761777(0 gnu I I N i7CROWN TM -28 TEXTURED STEEL STREET LIGHT POLE 155' NORTHEAST OF CENTERLINE OF CAMPANULA WY. TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPUCANT CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS 1N AVVVI YL 0.•. 130 YAM. VA ]'0.730. 00 0.74.. •10M17 (51 177-17» JURISDICTION 43 414> 77 rota,. 7 5. 11 547 1.1 455.5.» ENGINEERING FIRM/SURVEYING CODE COMPLIANCE Y500 CO50ltAm04 44517. 1S 41 •021 0 5. 07002.$ 224.4.2 IC 7(47064.0 t '321 602.662 Mty1m n 400} 771 00 U7054 07 7471 420 777 7 4430104 00005 15 100 K MX 704740 OM., CA 1642 A 17.0717» 067 LOCA. /on /00007 5905.75 54.01 00- 435 -0425 6 Ii.IC Wt.. 14075 14 77 ru 449-52 -5115 COORDINATES w 051505. 40510 - 55700012 71..47 559475 SIM •060.7 722797 (507) 137 -0520 201 754■7 (2051 304 -0120 ca 122.0 M 103040>1 SI7(! A 0 794 125.54 2 5: (9N1 7x.6435 K 7 , 111•..42.7 5 41 106£.4T 155. IWM! 71.! oro +•: -4514 2 1010010.4(00( I (7•0441 Ulna UM N • on PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Th ovals •.•e.a w7n 7.••7 <. +_17 0. --- .5■•• r. w 4,7•.•9e• wr✓u01 142829 vO17. room is mv. sn. �saa6 4pv • iW W.+t�Wlu axw • mw Sm1 > -1 1,04111••• ••∎1..4 5.3045..11. 4 0.4.16 • LP i._•Qi ARV) VICINITY MAP DATA TABLE [ CITE 1/19/19 ''1/14/12 3 .;3/4/'2 � Maximize Comm � Group, Inc ' 37' .31/C.414 RCAD 5.970 '0: 49>704A. G 92462 orr1Cr (909) 785 -7170 7> ;9091 992 3113 vtI MO- 0 O 0 X5.•13 T14•••••• ]400.04 5 01£ *40:611. 75 Cr. 75954 JE••191E47 1C0.2.196 90 0.7 701.0.} CROWN ' col 0=X92 4v7 X101 1, t4 991 "9 to 1 to - M - 25 5 11E PAIN k MMRtk55 IACVl.71111040 !MGR 703 7f. 00(g03510 »Y 7541030• •FMECY..' 7> 72992 J J J • 000110`~ 0(40 410 F•/O'OM �Y Wv/ra e 103 4(^.4ar •• • 1[4411 O 042 4414410 - - 014,43• - M4 *E 1(710 UK - - 4.M KMI l '691411 61PR -t- Wtf 00A C.001 - 094 4,110 304 • 4400 - - 49147* 0 41 '. gang -4- 0014 44, Mt LEGEND 21 SINS•Ga I 4 C'4.9 9X9 • WOO. MI 9143• X10/4019 aaa aaTa*, wh 4R 2NR: al 07‘10 57 0 f (11 Sate EA 051 WW1 196 90. Mpg 14444009)4440910. 494.4 4* : M' 0{411 . La 4400 sal R 413810 4.10•540 4 1 IRO AM• • NMO •0>6a 160M Si 914 41104 a TOMOY N 10 6114 Amara r' •4.4, 46'04 Shat •5 WV( [004,.0 444E Va. • Y 4 01 6 0 4'03111. YEYX M 44, KM t 4,443 a 004 1' R- a elk R•0A i MT a X041.\ 4. •41000 4700449E 10:. RR 111 n• 411 0 SOt •75,411 1 CNIIIS G Sal • 0 M1101MY11 NI ,(043504 At W I.elRE 114411 VW 041 li• 44.4 CC w.0(•• ark •• .0.1 •••• SM• AAA. 1[ C,• U•••St aa- 1.OM e0010t1 f M04N'O WW1 Cs new4.:4't 92690" 0(6.14, WWE *PM4XWJ1. 'Al -4401 • 4 as all 43441X0 Ma WA (54444 944, WNW 4 9400 1111. 442 NW 9a 40m Ckakelel MOR VIM, 411 40*0(C l.l•11 !N 114*0041.0.10014 551•10 9114 M All 144 »1(( 1.4 4,O , 144 5.15,01545$ 0 7a aa5,0 w'0( J 380•43/1 a.. 114 01"0103 4 .. .1.11 0 ( AC 06.44 10! it Manta I r man 10 4.9[10 9/100 447 141.6101Ltfp ` 0 RC+1ID w4. !M R spa 4' x9* 4.444 4114 s 4 114 Cr, 14 • rear Wade 471t 4073* 0• Ararat 44. R W 0 ;t4M:K 4,5 EWE K MO • at MUM SW MM x 15.0 RM RIM M 4,0 a4N 0( 4 RAC .4-Or A 030X 9434 64X1. 4 FIr- tONS..4101 MO4C I4. 0) eau a. at* G Mom. C•61477t 0 On talaaCE N4T WET •.144a MOW�� AY 51410)4047 0.4174 4440(44. M• Oa I Ali Ia.. 5 1 4, 38 0 4 / 10 1' N(.1 9 ( YE 4,: 01'44' w+ < 0561(71 IS. Iirma++ M R• It Mika GA 114 �N 0 0 + a • 4 0(70• 14(740.44 N: 4,039 04 wu EE : Wnlra to 94•• A0 ./384'50 //0004061 44006 1 µ o V Swl ME... EE... SE61Y M ay 0S I Q o+VR 4415 K 5 04 6. gam i R9N1 043 4, 0 14NC 4,E •*100.14 ak a9.n 404 460 •000[5 fns 4 14 911 0640001 a 0904 5 n6. 41:4 11 FE , 143504 0430000 0064 n Mr 1440149 0R4 ...Ate 404,0(006 4944 mew 055D 1 40-05 R x/ Mona Lv4 art Y v 105044•0X7 o4446 R n4 Mass a0 Ia., Warr. 1009 •40804 n4 mama nt *11104. 1.177•50 •44 Sot 1443.1431 44, (114.10 70, 1•43 r 4,438E 1(0 43 900 3• rat 4 '! 411 ware Cr K re Arne" 4.44 WA. 40 RCM0} 1I 405 0 444 43•40 059 l 041 a 1 NO wb 4504 Ni6C ' 4I1'414444Q IN OO•P f01C W I jxr 95106 •/ 4*906 6 M 000 •••••111(0 4,r 061•'M0/CaM40l 11 r 9.44. 41 M 6-I" V °ur.s o 1• 04•040 '0 1.343 *0 052.• 4 •49 ii !0 44,011. 344 4,40 a.AAr5 a •04,434 Y 4,4 /110.431 OM44*4X 1a 0' 'J.. 436 0Ma 1385 044'1 ( J 0v Owl 6 ••••4 6.041.0 ..N.17 031 awn .4414344= •14•C14 CAMAS) 44 4044 K104 M •0744 6t 3* 4fr, (50044 Is It 404410 4 • MOW •0 OMMAC 9434 40 .Moat 40 On 4Ir urn w •44Z cos .04 114 R0E•1 4 44 n 104 40 O30 3 •0.'40410 a peas Main: a 49•:43 40 MaM4 4144% 419 41444 Au vfxat 1014 M 14370410056040/1 0044.0 7141004340 11 Mow M asu.X 4X1 039 4003/ 11 1. 0001. f 4400 0116110, 00 •' 444011 01 14 41100 19 atA r y6. 111{.74 t6. NO,E al Ste.. NO IN Ara. nor 9401 MVO en „h61') below. Callbefore you dig. GENERAL NOTES 51105. MID 40W41a0*4- Yl7afr1 rah at 304 .5 X11 4,0 8411 .1.••••••f 0 •f .®N 0110• INC M We n M =61[11 a Xfw'01500<wo 4, oar 00 Meat 94 Cnotrrr1 nr44(4 • R 4rra, 4 4 a0 011 C.C.. RXl•ka. 0'4 W s n4, ` R`t p AO l •••••54 IM94a +9ra4ss•4wl. a 10400 wait •• •• coma. fat 4X.9 ions •• t14:410 OG IX ty v9+ Ml NA4 a4 'D4 00ut Ca0( me •104411 Yav u 4,4 943, W4y0 1114 Iry to., a 14.'. 4(4 vaY 14'.14044 414 1104 191. 0116{00..40 Wan • 4 sr, tan' ft W4MARO R 44,4 • N 0}94e to I)140 Ma: 1M SK4 Wart 1 4 - X1 AT •en Mtn a MMt19 • • Tb19 4104" WM. 0fa o4, 110 044. SE 24.1647 944 ...I w 1 4M as 4074,4140 a7 Opt W U4* of AO N4a1 aa441 0 Mall Mat 43'4. 40 - R slay! 9 x9449: 41 Y PO49444014, 474• 0 KC" IY41 aka M = O ▪ 43'4 M as. MNE 14a 65 V: N SW1[V 056 9101 C'.. Cale • son (3844 raw. 10•,14, la M a M Oo7 � 11a 043: 0X10 pt *500 Ka 4301.1 • 110' 0941a TIT 9•1SW' M Mara 1Va Cr al Ital 0903 auto. 4 91 1a eau ow alma isaw .1•1[04.0 91. 1••001 N 910a C' 4,: • Dana 44 404,04.03 0 0144 111. 6 K 44 51 INC. 94 Sa ME R• 1340 3 *4 UMW. 5043115X441 1*, aMOI C M 9.4, Oho, 101.4[4111 U 94441 Vila ,N 40 * 0* V 4,0. at0' 4 041110011•6 449442 w ma 74. a9 N.1a1 ROM 67'a19 90 6 6 461109 4 44 010 3 9044 0)09* • [ 4,0005//001 M •9444 , 44N 160.5*< Xa.. NMI Waa aai as N. 04114,8}' 030610 164 0420 4,,* 94,' 44450.1 0000:10.'444 Val X 0 0 45 110412.0 • N 4600 4420 11403 • 45 0004 0 19454 4 4, f7* ra9u M 19 4.6..•]7{1 °awl A J'M1 11113 4 0{1■••• Aa a0C 14•• u .O 01. 4 0_ R 17 Y N 6013441:(31,0 44. 4 fan 41 94 4( N4 Cumin f44'0443 • •(0M 4 0 0 .1.4 9140 90004, 0 404.40 4344(144 Na N Worm 94. a4. 41 ,04,1• Cr 4 41 W ARM ra • Maaar Ina 4{9 4 19. 9 Pat4119Ar..M 179 v 4,1144 411103290 •4 r. 949aX 40194'994306 At 4144 55 1.10 460111 4!• M�91M0 ,E111 1 4,401 1 f 1044* ii.:li Nf MI u 010 < ' 1 a =3*40 4l•41 Iy4M so:10K 449400. a00tb1[ 100 0 .5 N D.C. - "Gat 0 * ••902 M 01401 Al 6 054401*0 4 INY IO*'VG 4r :44[.1' Ka N 0126 N <IOW MAU N 4X12 N WE •9 401444 4.40 COMM IL1Mal.R % 10D Ws. arliaA late Man WV P 7M2• Y 4431.00044. 444,. *414100 Y 6101791• Cada Map •0010 zat I ac ME M% • NM 0419 all 440 4•• 434 389X4, &V afa3894 X➢ Y 44• pavaas•W 1•• par "mart 044111 N 444 904, a� X1104.1 rasa. tla (0441 4,•t wan 10.01 y4, ••• 0181 ••4 ME•'a V'Y.4 41(1494 2 14 100443894434E4 01••, 439>7144411 IO5.: 41104WJ 5.5 J M 0914 90.47 1'.115.5 4 t 10 ]1 ISP0 R 138(43• 4441 MR 44.4 NA M S 4*444 94 NIM * 41. 44 % MI 44 at464.0 4161/4 va9Qt Val WWII. 0 Mgt r r WW1 XFJU t :Y4, PO A ,YES N 041_.4 4,414 Apnea, • 49094 M aa•a Ir9.' alai 06 Matra VIM re an >ft4 44199 94 • 11114070 N 011.4 4 14 1.1111 kW. 664 NO mos 4 Sea fat p 9441 [ Y canna : 1 9410 8 OS AWL 01114,0 NAM. 40,4 IMPS I f !11043• W 96. • art [4,4[44 M A, 6.n NM. N v EY. 11:k.111 anal 4404*.Y MOW' alu lam.A, lama Ma %4434,10• 914447.611 1 & 4,O 4 •• 10,44• Au WA 4. Malirlat 0141440 4111940464 s 40041 a K? Walt 0 01:38 1061' macs 444 •. la 04,44* •444 *01 AL4r 50.443.154, .9Xa a•4o5 •. •4.10 WO. 0047 :4 110'00,1`0 C OX Ma'•6 O a9410OBEAp4 sY at 444 4C 1104,/01• RiT01 9 AD Tat s4 CCM.NV 4,64 arra MC WPM Ma MOtra0 MAD MR 4401 14•• 041 • R 4 Cai Ar16M9 C IMMO Mac 91491L• W Naf; 4,100 A. tuna 111 14,4,4, C:60949 Ira • :4E 1* N Wawa > 1a 4 0041 May 04000.1 KIM•4 MCI 8444 Mi 1414r Ma NOrt 01E 911ECY 03* •(CV earn M a 4 01 I1 Mall Tana. 14t. 61r fa FOa X64 94 43 15 1•••• C st at• symc 0Oy1M'140407 C.Yat9 01 OX• Raft 4441Maar (c'A./1•YI Ca10 WA941 It Amapa 7.44 Mai mil Mar alma Mai 1X41117 Ora 440 IM(r4c ti :A•• Ca a7a 00119 r'ma St. 9943 9•00400 • M 44'4110 sae De M a W 91409 pan 0 0240 a It 9 010115 4 9 041 19x4 WON (TM-28 -• • 494 YN04 (GM 9.11 ■ � � W 14 829 6.E'/ 441E 7/ 7)'4 1) )/ Dt5(4•j KC( KOCars MI6 3r R.415. CO`artaltr •(D OQ 4(910 MaxlmizeComm 38, Group, inc_ 1351 1404044 ROA 5411E 100 0)91040, G 92012 0 (7^_9) 756 -2 0•X: (9(44' )92 -3113 CROWN 4 X) 204 519 511 250 1. 944 75 5. 046 . N -28 '0't AM IE 4 40(1 IEVECI'1A \ ER4 tick 'A 15 00147010 1,404 3• 'ilkWlA Eit 99590 7A311 , 46. .16:944• M •649111114 h 54, '40 A1.v4f1 � W 7.1ro1w ;.Asti,. 01.4117•11,1%•-h e' • - 1 1 Mom Mom. .r MM. 'a.'a 11. \FLEX WAVE PRISM KOTHREIR SI All 011111 y:: • • • •.� -r a r x— n._ 'ra .aar•••••. WRNS asllow40esmia.r■ asn.4.s.na Ar . • r•11•i.Y.r1• 1 J 3 KATHREIN ANTENNA 840 -10525 I IRTUREIR SCAM NvnMOI amr nW = rte A.m.. es • 2 KATHRIEN ANTENNA 800.10270 ` ATM -28� a■ Ph•UEcI . 442.02, 2 s Alf rt 2/•4/12 c>ESourlrr, M1.1v.I v POOL, AW .A. or nAwc =Ma dr. J •'I +I A) I J51 PCAA\1M 4YD sum 'co e cwro, G van e mcr (MO 7AL_7.7C .Q: TM -28 .01 1:1e1 A A.NOMR: ILVLCWA 1IINlR{ NW. Y8 e 01011matut110s oo• 'iMl .UA CA V2Yfl nth "% WCEKAIM / RNiN1A1 81: :16 :rt1 Br ✓C{4 \[1 : Yr I A V - it r µ W1'42 TtFT'!: 1 J \ T3 1 ti 1 MaximizeComn\ �� Group. Inc. CROWN •IM Yxv Al(- so• rc ... c-earoov :r 1 PHOTOSIM \....VICINITY MAP 1=4 3 SITE PHOTO - VIEW 2 SITE PHOTO -VIEW 1 (TM-28 VA o ht. » DATE 1/19/12 7/14/12 3/4/ � " Mexl mlzeCam i . � Group, Inc i�1 99.41.9"5 acw s:.rtF :a COkOM G 92662 OTFICF: (909) 785 -2170 rm. !909) 992 -3113 CROWN 1 100 OEx1F9 AVE SAT 250 SFAIILE. /G 98169 .•ARtinraL..tw SITS 990 rM - 28 2116 MIIIE & A(VAk55: RECD NEINOHRX WE 78 x' taw 9 am.%tl way* 1111EI:JU CA 92592 1 C `:4':-.. Flif/T05 a FL 'a Fi i1 1 Q7V�'iV(r P1 1 r0R1 OOS NN W IRE EvSTIKE IM] OG•0' .4 WPERGRORs] RUIN PEES OR •AIS AIG OR Rr0000(4 R<MI R 0 ,0 1WRE 3 0030 IMV ON,' .MVlJRL y,LWARGI.RkS ^.R 11-FN :C .Sr0'. •4i. VMEI 11.0 171RII■CICR "RAE 400E 00E •ECwICRMA urA30RES 10 3003(0! •LL 041,: tiRES ,:O,CRG MOSE 355 SWAN GR 004 00 0(0310 6. 05.1.110 OIG9LF" 40 40005 0(0003 010000030 003000/31 500.0 01• 704 PG .30.0 (IMI.0 S,'.) Nl (M0MG 001 1 11(5 00(130 00 I, 33RO010 CORER. 001. 0`1 SCMARU: ELAM 10 •0.•AE R 0 14 1'I6) 00u00.15 r0EC0IA 000003310 0)031.05 031604 (E050) 9.0ERVI3OFN1 3.041 00 REGF o(0 N IM(- I41C■1)C M1(I04 10A. TO 0 0330 0111 3n RAP 0*0004••x 30 * fit cue(( av*R o3 7r' (E) 000055 _ (1.) was F M ritifii6iii -�.—� l ; 0__ I<4i41 0." WRY Know what's below. Callbefore you dig. SITE PLAN IE, 0R48A1 • (3( 2 K IRw roC (e, C10 C4$' 10) oJmR 10 05001 IM]I (,3(0 (0) MR 511114, ( ; 00 U) 3(lER COO 01)010 • Ay 12. 18,0103- (0) MAZER 3 FROM r 0.0 (0) :?S 3 /403! 2O,C (E,) UR'IELN'Y } (E) 00•)0:3 M 1 (E) 0300 1 00 (3. (E) 1 30 05•08980, 0 Os SI, NS 005 4. 01 00 3E is ')OR TI -I 1 1 2 1 TM - 28 1:3 <E3 9mr rear ,R]11 10.3 001 3•41.003 ] h;1 42829 � I •<iV 1 yla AY:10 1/ 4•(.34,MR• ?Mwcs S 7,:{012 OEppyviRSR. Ger 7/q, 1 1 Cr+ Mug) FOR . 1 Maximize Com(1 Group, Inc. 1 35' POND A Jr= SO dE IC 1 04031. CA 92082 :MCC (9613) 71'5 -2'3C :AA (909; 932 -3 _.-._0__ u ,0x104 A,e ;WY 2:n .111t F 01 301!3 Yr 30. F M - 28 53) AAM= x *31.405 l Ut:Ctlk wlN+OFK NCLE 2E -5410'0a ,(,3000030 9<5X 51!5 P.*1 ) ( ....., v " Of. 141:: 0 /r -ri7:4 O P Al 1 . r /ST:1: •VIt .OPlt:. a ,30,4141,0 UAln .IC{ L110U4 11 05121 AA '44 14441 AAA( YAM RI 4110,4 44.44914 4 4.1t'v T O1 MM.MV, `4 4(411: , 14 nI W/N 1141 4 M1144114': Pl 1-1 •. 44a10s5 /IR (041 44 ViIA\'44 Wt 'J:: tAACAIR1.).A41 '4'YL'. 1V 1 •• 1 91111 IK XIL1' 144.4.. ♦. 4044 704. 84144 W Wt 1x1 400144 (if 4.41/4 4444.111 w 444.03 (MAC ( 444.'444101 YN: ta01t Arap 404. 4814 Oa*' .0( lit ( 4r 34.3• 11444 (04(44.4111 ZOA t01WECI.JH GH 41PM44J( IM115 •'\! ••1141 1 901 c 11414.114 40494.415 1014. AM .M �YN4.1 VIIO 111 CIJII CIAqej 24. L '. 3 41(50 C- 4OIf3 K7T 4 ' 0 E 0494 034 0444 Yu 43.4444E 5J= W11RL41X4' 404041%4 Yom. ,.. . 4.l. `a' _ �� k „ ~fi r ) . '/ 'n / LE.) SI TTLY. '� 'T` E PpO S 0414 . / � fEj CAS 5' - 6" 1 hHUTA 1 . 0 C -. ! Krow wh:VL3 below. Call before you dig. ENLARGED SITE PLAN (8) !0.5(41 4 ^ :E) TF.1NS°ORVER NO ^5468586 117136' (8(11 1 4814 YL 27441 OR S18(t 4 P 11: 011.113 0.3 10 MOO. 441 X2 5 n +10 44 41 1 14 t 441 ■04E SEc 41:4134 (4 S46 I )4l V4 3 BEY 114.1 48 44. 14*3 A 141 11 5•:111, 144118(4 411. 54411 (441 4 541- 1121.414 4 17080.4 e'Cn> R144*6 1 14 Sratnbt 8'. 441,1(= 5 1 `7 O)C 119 ad. 1,1 x (41 SO .3 071E 'C 4. %CRP ( TM - 28 4 0 'r t 441 ''4 . 1441 .; CG +w 34(T 142829 OAT! 4`429 444! I/:5/12 7 2 /:d /I2 3 314/12 ,.X 4_4 1.. 4Hf.L111 '4 a• c , OESCF I1 Oh 1 $..'•/M 044443 44444 R1,4,14A 24 '4.' 441 Z'1,. 4411 :n :44.4x'1 u1 �•� \ Maximize Comm. 7* Group, Inc. 95' '044318 WC 1 '54 4.44446. ' A W007 C4hH,t (474) 169 -e1e( '12 (9093 392 3 . 1! . 1 (L%'((. AVL 5.1 s50 :I il 4 ws 90`:9 \,.. 4..21.22 144. 't"E "lPN FouA 81 ; - Cl ' . 4 94 .4(1414 _ ✓ - 7 N3V� A1.1 1 CROWN .M-26 ' 11 W W; Q 80144.55 RANK Mkt' "L8 = w(n o 0 M% 20404 TYWCI.IA LA 92547 r 0, SM. • lel Ivrea OM.. Noel. ta au... Vaal. 14 Nj Neil> en* C4M 1i PCP- r - ,•1 1.S kOrE 1111-RED MEL STRI/ LColr A:Cr TO If LESKAM) AO WAUFACIVREO yr 0141LS - \,,,WEST ELEVATION TrEURED SIEEI SKr ' PILE S 10 / III ra now., .a 34 • Ct ITO smccr _.crs .,,.......„...........,.,,,.- 49-mteauctAven. VG Wag,. Pisi0 S44711 MC•00,5 04. r 2 SOUTH ELEVATION CO Maio ALI 142829 2 5 15,602 :4 CrAlf. ri.3.,. , l e maximiz in e c. Comm. 135 K' S Cot CAMPO. CA 9460Z OFTTC (9C9) 79E-217C rAX: (909, 922- 3 r L- CROWN I1:0 DEXTER AVE 51A1' [ EAIllk, 14. 96109 •••0117•,•311117r. [31E `.0 IV -28 4 A0.1.5..- klitOR tat A EIKE:7 C013111 Dawn `EVCCvLA CA 92592 C etVA1las6 C . 97 1-10 Amp p41) Ft APPANEO P 1.9 5t. . Ey . ;NEET 437101 ' ItAA A2 1 NORTH ELEVATION () OM** o•rmu 74 mamas u•s "" •Ifx•ar * WS. MOWN •••141 .an "." law wolok WOIE OINEIS MOW STML WATT JO MI ID 9 DiSTAIED WAIT TISKNACID 32 TEATaRED STEEL STREET 03/11 PC,f KEAST ELEVATION 111 / *Thft .4 wk. 4.022 A „Mg otkftc Tw11 Lv• .ed. •■•••••• ••■•., &KRIM MOO aft, 4i .1.5$ I I •...■ /NAT klEk0OWS DR • - ••••••,. , r• • • r C9 '" 1717 Tt - '41X;117 •0 1 ■Lpt..., ci•• ,-.. ...:4' , • TEA k2 1421329 • 11911 AL:101 , 9.4 "..../•••••T .■•••••4 3 / 4 / 1 , titlaV urr rt. e 1 die Maximize Comm. Wo Group. Inc. 1391 9000144 RIK; SLIT CC ZO)014). CA 92892 WC! (C9) 7M-27n ...x (9091 992 31 CROWN "TV DEVER AY: SU T 239 STATILE. TO 99)09 - • 444 cronfterft TV-28 S lk INK it Al■■•;11.5S, BEAU 1E.110K HOU 2t sr OM 7 WADI 7 0611.0 1.00.-4tA LA 92992 ( I ...LVAIDNI5 ) t (.... ,• L., ••• • 3o 1 4 1 s" .7C - 414 4 ll A3 , 1 • 0.11,* .111.00 CO IV* *Mimi a. ISMS • ..,••■■• TYPICAL CONFIGURATION NOTICE \ „NOTICE SIGNAGE tot • ••• la. VS. ti. 80.0 a ot• J a. . —we .1 /a itvex I ...At& AmItto., IX< • ., fo4loon S.W.... .t...bulno4, 10 12 '4 .0.1 bo M.o. 01,,0416.1. Ege" :71.-71T - Itall3howlltb31.6455.Pd. nywooiltu ItCytolloate tqfstninli , tInvil...lore.........11* j ....o.rern 0 1.3N -4171IP -11. .713,74,<CR STRAX31 ••XC b SL F �)L BO:4c -1 I =110 ;TYPICAL EQUIPMENT ASSEMBLY l•rne1t n t A TYPICAL ANtENNA ASSEMBLY 1 1 2‘.....d 9 NOT USED ANTENNA MOUNTING FLANGE • .4 ,; L 7.1 11.:11 lei Wt. IV, ANDREWS ION-M17HP-19P A s 2212A BE ■MIlEg: g•41.31•ZZIMP-7.."Z 1 7 GROUNDING LUG PLATE ••••■ 0111. 5 ;KATifigkil_ANTENtuk8W-1027# 2 1 E s !CIRCUIT BREAKER ENCLOSURE ,„7:a. 4 KATHR1EN ANTENNA 840-10525 1 'IV 11.) 142829 rItoxi, *30 CV-R.1Hr tr.ALP ebt Maximize Comrn. Group, Inc. ROE Irrcr ;9cs: .40t k9u), - [ I ' CROWN Avi NJ•T )7. VATTIE. W44 95509 ea. t Sli . 42 1F All sh !CA it. 35 WOW 1 ittOUt thritt ;••• VZ•291 ( . -2 ;if '1' ..`.1' 14F ii. EY , 41 , 1 44.ttt A4 `NOT USED N J1 1,1,11 6" CURS . TEXTURED STEEL STPEET•• _7:14T POLE TYPICAL IN GROUND DETAIL WITH STUB -UP • TYPICAL CITY OF TEMECULA LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 4 1 r.At 11. xo 24 " %36 MIER RAND HOLE 5 -UP \ • !.• 'ff41mi61rit! GRAM 0 .-1 o' -0 s 3 HOPE lEmtC.J.SINAYT 441.!_941. b JS4: 1 ALI 7LE9O45 'EC N :MGM CR (045R Wk. p' 31CPELIED .00 (905'0 RARE A RIACI 8.114 IF_ 61NC146) S'I:U11E.VOKS 604 FLE4.0 8(4 (390196( 10 2 Sa1FACR 939ES 4N1' e4. EYP.D7E) ICP tREACP FA/!12 JOSS LESS DYh 3O7' : 1 AI A74IE 9'4 Et 190CA 0711 .CH'S, IP It fEAINEA•D h:NS 445 AU' 5090691E HEW; CUT 45 0999.90 OP 5095599. 3•' I:C CAT 9\C!`R (359 ST9 Ad. 4070 fE0 IFIE0c92 ) 4 LH.495 DIIR0N4 t 11649199"(1 3r R[ ii '4/90. 46156.511:145.1 5441 92 549910 C WAX K00 as 805. At 351411 'Q' 0f _R^.NAE1 AT 9(34458 5 00011 10 (LNSYlxi CG AC PAVLLLPM 6 SAN all 'C A CIA Y3N9Ci0 N9t 9149291. LSSL 6 ME 9498.9 990(9ED LAKE. 1 2 5 414 SAL 3E MD (1LEC x147 R w414. IC' LM C2- PC -64 -IC AC. 16(849 A CLF PR17'CLIEO PAM' WO.14,. RARER CALLA. 908. 4 43.3'54 WA :139 AL: 'RE4C1LS 500 A 11.411;61 OR (EAGER 1 110 STANDARD 407 AND 407A NOTES I .: 17 UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL 1 :w 19 . SCE TRENCH DETAIL 5 •S R 'S3 '1Q'LI"�S id T •S:I']F ' . 37 5000 RC 36.201(; 3 /G' Iu 0971 C .. Mt* _ U'0 YYOGSVOr (TM. 4' ♦TEE CN.X.)1 N.= • 4 9•1. 0*00 IS D4k•I[- P.NIK• Or. EOEN414 c 00 04 to • 4015 3 C • AY99 C 451 901951 *1.809/8.9 ++r9a44 • ocrov ASmnIAm • „ AYR 04115 RHURf o at 43 I{I/MWr�4A Tor KM N • WSW "CA UU0. 00 11 .tD.cu7A9 CAVIL RW •4.0: SOM3 24"X36" FIBER HAND HOLE I'°; ' 5 8k• �/ 9:N4 IyM9s.Cr ,c1'43 acw3 6m% V I GROUND ROD DETAIL r SARI 1110x1143 of L 4.p I l 6 BORE DETAIL 1 Iw - MOS O. II 444Ii f I T s lame. 14 8• 00.>. 000 9 V: 991 +04.4. 1= 4 SCE APPROVED METER PEDESTAL 1'"? I) 3 2 i i - m t pz,81 ul 00 3r � A7 142029 IA11 ' I;.N /•9/13 •'• -�Aw✓ r'9s.;1 /1''/ 12 :r'�u�w i•"o�O.r�IVw n� S/ i/12 . =O. Cr ECR :COMP MX' CwV / \ Maximize Comm. � J Group, inc. 1 'WOW. 450"1 510E .0 100@7N4 ..x 92661 ' STT CT (959! 706 -7' 7• PAX (939, 99/ - 55.5 [ 255 999 9R AYE FI'T 25 EATTI E. rW 40407 raw 112+093 :Ye SIC '44.. TM -28 6 19 IMP * 444.90.85 III GU} N 1 W;FK IK L = II.OIA!' T OnJ1P(0 1.4E9IIA CO 90592 ( SILL' 'ILL 1.1e Vefit•C ) 'i4N4 01 >-rr.m F' 3iPy5r` r, 10 9tf N'.1r' "" A5 1 / PC RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0119, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH TEXTURED STEEL STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -28) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SUNNY MEADOWS DRIVE, 155' NORTHEAST OF CAMPANULA WAY (APN 959- 203 -024) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 19, 2011, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on June 20, 2012, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0119 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antenna will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new textured steel street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Sunny Meadows Drive, 155' northeast of Campanula Way, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20 day of June, 2012. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Ron Guerriero, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 12- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20 day of June 2012, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0119 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high textured steel street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -28) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Sunny Meadows Drive, 155' northeast of Campanula Way Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: June 20, 2012 Expiration Date: June 20, 2014 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Textured Steel Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right -of -Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS - 1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions /Information B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Provide regulations governing minimum distance Above Ground Level (A.G.L) for antennas. PW -6. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT: NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project APPLICANT: Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle LOCATION: The Project includes the installation of 39 DAS nodes within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way, County of Riverside DESCRIPTION: NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (DAS) to provide wireless telecommunication services to multiple carriers. NewPath proposes to develop a 39 -node DAS throughout the publicly owned City right -of -way (see map on back side of this Notice). The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called "nodes." Each node consists of antenna rays constructed within or on a new slim line monopole camouflaged as a new street light, or located on an existing utility pole. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the Planning Commission intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the project design and /or the Mitigation Monitoring Program will be included as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project, which is available for review at City Hall. The Comment Period for this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is February 14, 2011 to March 15, 2011. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033. City Hall is located at 41000 Main Street. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through: The Local Newspaper [Posting the Site Notice to Adjacent Property Owners If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact Matthew D. Peters, AICP at (951) 694 -6408. Prepared by: '+n�h � �k550(.■ °C. (tAw -. (Signature) (Title) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Matthew D. Peters, AICP (951) 694 -6408 Project Location The Project includes the installation of a 39 -node wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way, County of Riverside (see attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan for locations) Project Sponsor's Name and Address Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath c/o Crown Castle USA Maximize Communications Group, Inc. 1351 Pomona Rd., Suite 110 Corona, CA 92882 NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle USA 1100 Dexter Ave., Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98109 General Plan Designation NA (Not Applicable) — all antennas will be located on new street lights or existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. NA (Not Applicable)— all antennas will be located on new street lights or existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right - of -way. Zoning Description of Project NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS ") to provide wireless telecommunication services. The proposed DAS network is a low profile system capable of delivering wireless telecommunications service to customers of multiple carriers such as AT &T, Verizon, Sprint, and MetroPCS. The proposed network initially will supply the infrastructure for NewPath's anchor tenant, MetroPCS. The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called, "nodes," which receive an optical signal from a central hub and distribute the signal in the form of Radio Frequency (RF) transmissions. For this Project, the hub is outside the City's boundaries (as are three other nodes, one in the County of Riverside and two in the City of Murrieta). Within the City of Temecula, the proposed network consists only of the antenna nodes. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of -way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 1 Each node consists either of antenna arrays constructed within or on a slim -line monopole designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right -of -way, or antenna arrays fixed to existing utility poles owned by the Joint Pole Committee ( "JPC "). Each facility generally features a 53.74 -inch Kathrein Tri- sector antenna within a flush- mounted housing (for new poles) or three Kathrein antennas mounted to existing JPC utility poles. Either configuration also will feature one or more Flex Wave Prisms or similar "fiber repeaters" mounted to either the new street light or the existing JPC utility pole. The fiber repeater converts digitalized spectrum received from the hub into RF signals emitted from the antenna array. Where the new node is proposed for an existing JPC pole, the facility also features a ground mounted meter pedestal. The Project involves the installation of both aerial fiber -optic cable on existing wood utility and newly installed street lights, and underground fiber -optic cable installed within newly installed and existing poly vinyl chloride (PVC) conduit in previously disturbed rights of way. The newly installed fiber -optic cable would connect 39 distributed antenna system nodes and ancillary optical conversion and power equipment also attached to the same utility poles within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way. Another three will be installed outside the City limits; two in the City of Murrieta and one in the County of Riverside. The entire network will be connected to a newly installed fiber -optic base station hub. Construction of the proposed DAS Project will consist specifically of the following: • Installation by NewPath of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed as street lights; • Installation of 39 DAS nodes each containing either: one (1) tri- sector pipe antenna, three (3) antennae insiode radomes, or between three (3) and six (6) panel antennas installed on the utility pole; • Installation of fiber -optic equipment (i.e. optical conversion equipment, signal regeneration equipment, switching equipment, etc...) mounted on existing wood and newly - installed street lights; • Installation of 4 -inch Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) conduit; • Aerial installation of fiber -optic cable onto existing or new wood and street lights; • Underground installation of fiber -optic cable into existing and newly installed conduit; • Underground connection of network to one (1) hub facility to be installed inside an existing public storage facility located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Rd.; • Installation of pull boxes and hand holes; and • Splicing of fiber -optic cable into facilities. The location of the proposed Project is illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan, and each location is further described on a corresponding and attached spreadsheet. Engineering drawings for a new street light and co- location on an G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 2 G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 3 existing utility are also attached. Construction is expected to last approximately 120 days and will consist of two (2) aerial crews and two (2) underground crews working simultaneously to complete construction of the proposed Project. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The Project proposes to develop a 39 -node DAS network throughout the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way adjacent to various commercial and residential zones Other public agencies whose approval is required None G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Noise Population and Housing Biological Resources Greenhouse Gas Emissions Public Services Recreation Cultural Resources Transportation and Traffic Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use and Planning Determination (To be completed by the None lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have be a significant effect in this case because revisions the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE a significant effect on the environment, there will not in the project have been made by or agreed to by DECLARATION will be prepared. a significant effect on the environment, and an I find that the proposed project MAY have ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, imposed upon the proposed project, nothin• further a significant effect on the environment, because all adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to including revisions or mitigation measures that are is required. Signature Printed Name Date For fd. In, a6ll G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 4 4- Y 4-- L L L CIA OA CLO J J J 4-- 4- a) v a) Q v v v >- rn r/) r/) CL) 3 3 3 o v v a) a z z z 0 y ro 0 J cc ro 0 t 0 0 a) 0 0 u 0 L t 0 O m "O cc r0 L as 00 0 O a, uJ w 0 cc ro 0 r0 O V) 0) L 7 0 L!1 CO cc ro 0 L r0 2 4- O a) N N 0) L 7 0 rn U 0 ro E O 0 U r0 a CO r0 ro E 0 (I) N 4- a) 0 0 ro 0 0 O c E r0 V 0 N a) ro coo a L U c 00 CC 0 0 0 L 7 O rn L 0.0 00 J J Q) a) L_ 0) 4- +., N In CI) v Z z O CC CU 00 N - Cr) CU 7 m 0 W Zr) (NI Ln to 0 0 ro c U 0) E aJ F- O a) N L 7 0 CL L U CO CC > 4-- 0 0 U 0 L t 0 ro C r1) r-1 r o rl ro ro L 0 dJ 0 a) 'a N ro CL) L 0 z ci N m Lr) N Ol ri O O O O '71 m H H H H H H H N 4--0 Y 4-+ 4- L L L L L • J J J J 4-, 4--, 4-, 4--+ (1) v 0) v 0) CU 0) y+ N 4- +, 4--. rn V') CO N l/) CI) 0)) aa)) v v Z z z z z r0 O t 0 U J V 0 Ln m m .-1 >2 r0 r0 3 O m v 3 O to a) c c 3 V) J U 0 z Ln 0 r-1 ai c r0 J a) CU N w r0 0 0 3 0 -a ro 0) 2 -J V 0 T.0 ro L r0 0 CU ` 0 U w 0 CC C - o 0 0 -J 0 lh O 0 0 O r CC C O U ro ro 0 0 7 - J 0 w 1.01 >- ro ro a) - J z LO N 00 N cr 00 O O O L- 4 c-1 N H H H H H H H a) ro c c w r0 0 J 0 '.0 l0 (NI r0 0 r0 c z t 7 0 U 0) co r0 J U 0 z oo (.0 c 0 V z ro v 0 C7 0 v d J V 0 4 O r0 0 cc to 0 L U c t0 CC w CI) v 0 0 0_ 0 Q Q 0 0 00 CIO +-, 4-0 c c +., CIO 00 .L0 U 00 J J n 7) J w w a) a) 0 0 a) N L L N 0) 3 ° 0) z z ¢ ¢ z r0 0 CC 0) 00 V) V) "0 a) a) CO 4- 0 N 0 O N m r0 c 0 U 0 L U ro 4- 0 rn w (/) cc (o L ro ,ED ro 2 V 0 w 0 0 ILO CC 0) a) 0 C 4- 0 N c O 00 ro a) ro V J U O rn l0 r0' c r0 - J a) 0 r0 0 c a H H H H H H H U a, co L 0) 1— T V) E O 4- 0 U (0 0 cc O U c 0) S 0 O v) z aJ • L (0 E O J (o 0 a (o 0 cc co 0 L U c (o cc 0 N a) 0 D_ CL 00 ,., 4-+ C L -C . •� J J X 0) 4-, w 0) v O V) V) L 3 3 0 Z Z Q a co 0 cc (0 c 0 4- v 0 L) (o cc 0 V) O a N O CC (0 00 co O V) w O (../) aJ (0 E U (o -o c 0) 0 w O m a (0 O cc (0 1 (0 00 (0 Z a (0 0 (0 (o 00 (0 0 in Vt (0 O cc (0 O (0 0 0 L U co cc V) Z 4- 4., L L . • J J 4 +-, ✓ 0) 0) 0) • N 3 3 CU CU Z Z T as (0 C a) (o J 0 w l!) V) a CC T c aJ (0 a) C 0) (7 (0 U c0 (0 C a) 0 O 0 m a (D 1 (0 000 (o (7 Z CO 01 O N m (Ns N N N N Gf 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L L G L 2 L L G H F- F- H H H L 0D 0 a) 4- V) 0) Z (f) (0 a (o O 0 (o C a 0) U 0 w O Ol T (o n3 (0 c 0) L v V) (o c 0) 0) V) J V) 0 CL no c �--I x w O L ro U a co 0 (o 4- i 0D 0 0 Z O O N a (0 (0 c v aJ V) (0 -J (17 w v 0 a a O O -o a, c O 0 0 t u_ a, 0 D_ - o O 0 rci U L O 0 co > 0 c O 0 CU a c ( a cc T CC a) V) v) a) 0 a 0 OD c X w 0 U aJ O L LD LC) 0 m 0 O O O (0 c a) 4- a) 0 (0 7 c v V) (1) 4- 00 • J v 0) v Z a O 0 a c CU 4- ro -o cc c a) co L v c v l7 V) Z L 00 0) aJ V) v Z Vf (D I■ 01 0 r-I N N N N m m m I I I I I I I L 2 ` 2 ` G L G 2 L H r L I— I H H 4- 4- _C ..0 -C L 0D 0D 00 00 J J J J 4-+ 4- +J 1 . 1 ) ( 1 ) ( 1 ) a ) a) a) a) v L L L L • 4- 4- 4- N V) V) V) cu CD CU Z Z Z Z a 0` (0 (o 00 ( (0 0 0 0 ut O La L a) 4- a) L U C V) Z 0 a) O CU N 0 W 00 '-4 a (0 0 0_' co 0 V) v) LC) n oO m m m S I s I G 2 G co 0 a) a) 0 a) V) v L U c a) O OD C O O 9 • O X 0 a. to n ▪ (o ( 1 c a) f0 E u V1 f0 \ a Z a) (0 0 m _ m (o S I L Q O O O 0 o 0 O cr ui Ln 0) 0A co O 0 X 0 O_ Q (0 C 0` -o C O 0 00 C X W c 0 N a) a) 0o (0 0 O X 0 Q O_ (0 a C 0 0D a) a c t U c a) - o a) O Q O 0 O O O cis m 1 5 s O to 0 { 11' / , ) § ! j ■ / c P 1! E | - § k 2 | 1 ® $ I | "I ( t t 20 1041 ¢` $ h • k| { k i / / ts \ \ , E 0 0 / 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: See the attached maps and exhibits included in the Project description for more information on the location and design of the DAS nodes. 1.a.b: No Impact: As indicated in the General Plan (Figure CD -1), The Project and the location of the nodes will not have an effect on a scenic vista or substantially damage any scenic resources as they are all located in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way adjacent to commercial or residential areas. 1.c. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The installation of aerial cable on existing poles would further add to the number of cables attached to the poles. These would be attached near phone and cable TV cables and would incrementally add to the visual impact of these structures. This additional impact would constitute a less- than - significant impact due to the presence of other cables on the poles. However, the proposed Project includes the installation of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed to match existing street lights located throughout the City right -of -way and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. The street light design will help the antennas blend in with the surrounding environment. In some cases, street lights may not blend in a rural area where no street lights exist. In order to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area, the following mitigation is required to ensure a less than significant visual and aesthetic impact: Mitigation Measure A -1. New slim -line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street light pole to match existing street lights in the right -of -way. If a new street light is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim -line monopole with concrete street light base — minus the "cobra" light arm may be acceptable. In rural areas, where street lights don't exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete "street light" type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights 1.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance 655). Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Lighting issues are addressed during the City's plan review and inspection process. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 5 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X X b c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use X X d e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? X Comments: 2.a. No Impact: The project has been or would be located entirely within the existing publicly owned right - of -way along existing roadways and within generally urban and residentially developed areas. No portion of the project site or adjacent areas is considered to be Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. 2.b. No Impact: The project is located within a publicly owned right -of -way and is not zoned for agricultural use or under a Williamson Act Contract. 2.c.d.e. No Impact: The project is in a publicly owned right -of -way that is not used or zoned for agriculture, timberland or forest uses. There would be no conversion of land from forest or farmland since none exists. G: \PLANNING \2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 6 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated X X X X Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? b c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: Construction of the Project will consist of four (4) work crews (two [2] aerial crews and two [2] underground crew) who will work simultaneously until completion. Each work crew will install all described components of the Project as they progress along the Project alignment. A typical underground crew will consist of the following: 1 backhoe 1 HDD bore machine 3 standard pickup trucks 1 dump truck 2 hand -held vibratory compactors 1 saw cutter 1 crane The following labor crew will be required: 1 foreman, 2 operators, 3 laborers (including flagmen), and 1 inspector. A typical aerial cable placing crew will consist of the following equipment: 2 aerial cable - placing vehicles 1 cable reel trailer 1 supply and equipment truck 1 pickup truck A typical aerial crew will consist of an aerial cable - placing vehicle with a driver, an in- bucket operator and one or two flagmen, depending on traffic conditions. 3.a. -d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project does not include development of new homes or businesses and, therefore, would not induce population growth in the South Coast Air Basin. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 7 Emissions during construction would result in minimal emissions from occasional vehicle trips to maintain the project facilities. Short-term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction would be less than significant through the implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM), as well as the following mitigation: Mitigation Measures Air Quality 1: • Minimize and disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion • Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials. 3.e. Less Than Significant: The construction of the project could generate fumes from the operation of construction equipment and from asphalt paving, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposurtes would be short term and /or transient since they would occur during the construction phase only. Furhtermore, SCAQMD rules restrict VOC content (the source of odor - causing compounds) in asphalt and paints. The project would utilize typical construction techniques in compliance with SCAQMD rules. As such, project construction would not cause an odor nuisance, and odor impacts would be less than significant. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 8 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Comments: 4.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will be constructed within the publicly owned right -of -way, which consists of primarily paved surfaces with no riparian habitat or habitat for sensitive species, wetlands, vernal pools, or marshes. No tree removal is anticipated and no migratory routes or wildlife corridors have been identified. There may be a potential for indirect impact to habitat from construction runoff or release of hazardous substances from construction. However, these potential impacts are discussed under Section 8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and are reduced to level that is less than significant through the implementation of an existing Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SPCP). 4.e. -f. No Impact: The project would not result in tree removal or impacts to biological resources. The project site is not located within a habitat conservation area; therefore no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 9 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? X c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: 5.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is to be constructed in the publicly owned right - of -way, which has been previously disturbed by grading, roadway, and sidewalk construction. It is not likely that intact resources would still exist in most of the project area; however, there is a potential that resources could be present in less disturbed areas. As a result, the following standard note shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 10 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of Toss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Comments: 6.a.i., ii., iii. Less Than Significant Impact: The Elsinore Fault traverses the City of Temecula and is located in an area of high seismic activity and faulting. In addition, the project area may be subject to severe ground shaking from a seismic event since the area also has high liquefaction potential. The project will be designed to comply with the City's seismic design standards for utilities, resulting in a Tess than significant impact. 6.a.iv. No impact: While the City of Temecula has rolling hills and areas of steep topography, the individual project sites for each node within the publicly owned right -of way are relatively flat and not prone to landslides. No impact would occur. 6.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The erosion hazard of the soils in most of the project area is slight. In addition, much of the area in the public right -of way where the nodes will be installed include turf. Erosion controls will be used where necessary along the proposed project route. The most likely situations for the use of controls will be when construction activities occur near storm drains and in landscaped areas where the slope of hillsides is steep. Control measures that may be used include silt fence, certified weed -free straw wattles and straw bales, and other control measures as necessary. Each node will require an encroachment permit to be issued by the Department of Public Works resulting in a less than significant impact. 6.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: As described above, the area is prone to liquefaction, and areas with expansive soils. The impact is considered less than significant as each node will be reviewed by the Department of Building and Safety for compliance with seismic design standards for utilities. G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 11 6.e. No Impact: Septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems are not a part of the project. No impact would occur. G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 12 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Comments: 7.a.b. No Impact: The proposed Project involves the installation of new concrete street light poles and new antennas on existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. The new and existing poles will not generate noise or greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, no impacts will occur. G:\PLANNING12010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 13 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Comments: 8.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activities have the potential to release three primary types of materials into the environment: petroleum based products used in construction equipment, bentonite slurry from boring operations, and runoff of silt -laden water from the construction site. To reduce the potential for release of these materials and to minimize the impacts associated with an inadvertent spill, NewPath will implement an existing Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SPCP). This plan will evaluate potential spoil scenarios, identify avoidance and prevention measures, and identify response actions to such situations in order to reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. 8.e. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The City's GIS mapping system identifies portions of the project area as being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. The project is subject to review and comment by the Riverside Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). The City of Temecula will require the project to be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to issuance of any permits. As previously provided for other projects in Airport Zones in the City of Temecula, the following standard mitigation measures will be required: G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 14 Mitigation Measure Haz 1: The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. 8.f. No Impact: The Project is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 8.g. Less Than Significant Impact: Access along project area roadways during construction is expected to be maintained so that residents living in the vicinity are not significantly impacted by the project. Due to the temporary nature of the project and the City's requirement for a Traffic Control Plan, the impacts would be less than significant. 8.h. Less Than Significant Impact: The project area is within an urbanized area and is not prone to wildfires. The impact is less than significant. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 15 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? Y. X d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f Require the preparation of a project- specific WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X • Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: Erosion controls as required by the City's Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be used where necessary along the proposed Project route. The most likely situation for use of these controls will be when construction activities occur near storm drains and in landscaped areas where the slope of hillsides is steep. Examples of control measures that may be used include silt fence, certified weed - free straw wattles an straw bales, and other control measures as necessary resulting in a less than significant impact. 9.b. No Impact: The project involves the installation of new street light poles and antennas in the public right -of -way. Groundwater will not be impacted. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 16 9.c.d. No Impact: The project would involve minor construction within the publicly owned right -of -way. The project will not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding. No alteration of the course of a stream or river would occur and no impact would occur. 9.e. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not be adding a significant amount of impervious area to the project area, since such facilities consist of a vertical pole and are constructed adjacent to previously paved areas. 9.f. No Impact: The project would not require the preparation of a WQMP. Thus, no impacts would occur. 9.g. No Impact: The project does not involve placement of housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map, because the project does not include any residential within those zones. No impact would occur. 9.h. No Impact: Any structures proposed to be placed within a 100 -year flood zone will be small and limited to poles, aboveground aerial cables, and underground cables. These will not impede or redirect flows. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 9.i. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, since this is a utility project in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. The impact is considered less than significant. 9.j. No Impact: No portion of the project is subjected to seiche, tsunami or mudlfow. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 17 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Physically divide an established community? Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X X b c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Comments: 10.a. No Impact: Installation of the DAS Network entirely within the City owned public right -of -way will not divide an established community. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 10.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The project has been reviewed by the City's Development Review Committee (DRC) for consistency with all applicable plans, policies and regulations, including the City's Telecommunications Ordinance, to ensure the project will have a less than significant impact. 10.c. No Impact: None of the Project components are located on lands covered by a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Therefore, no impacts would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 18 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Comments: 11.a.b. No Impact: According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the zoning classification of MRZ -3a has been applied by the State. MRZ -3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant economic value, based on available data. In addition, the proposed project is to be constructed in the publicly owned right -of -way, which has been previously disturbed by grading, roadway, and sidewalk construction that will not impact any mineral resources. Thus, no impact will occur. G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 19 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Comments: 12.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed Project will increase noise levels only during construction, and only between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday and 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Saturday (No Sundays) as required by City Ordinance 9.20.060.D. No increase in noise levels will occur from the operational phase of the Project because noise- producing equipment will not be part of the Project. The noise impacts associated with the proposed Project are expected to occur in the immediate vicinity of construction equipment. The increased noise levels will occur during mostly daylight hours, when average noise levels from vehicular traffic are generally the highest. In addition, the noise increase will not affect any one location for an extended period of time. The noise generated from construction activities would be short term in duration and considered Tess than significant. 12.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activity associated with the proposed project would not result in excessive ground -borne noise or perceptive vibration. Removal of pavement and drilling for new poles would create short term, low levels of ground -borne noise and vibrations. No high vibration producing activities such as pile driving, are proposed. Once construction is complete, the proposed project is not expected to generate vibration or noise. Therefore, impacts associated with construction- related noise and vibrations are considered less than significant. 12.c. No Impact: Once constructed, the DAS system does not produce noise, and therefore, would create no permanent increase in ambient noise levels. Therefore, no impact would occur. 12.d. Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in response (a) above, there would be a short term increase in noise levels during construction; however, due to the short duration and locations, the impacts are considered Tess than significant. G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 20 12.e. Less Than Significant Impact: This is not a residential or commercial development Project and the nodes are not staffed. Thus, the Project will not result in residents or employees being subjected to airport noise. No impacts will occur. 12.f. No Impact: The project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 21 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: 13.a. No Impact: The proposed project would not result in substantial population growth in the area because no new homes or businesses are proposed, and no infrastructure related to population growth is proposed. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 13.b. No Impact: No housing would be displaced by the proposed project and no impact would occur. 13.c. No Impact: The project would not displace people or housing, or require replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 22 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Comments: 14.a. No Impact: The project involves the installation of new concrete steel light poles or co- location of antenna facilities on an existing pole in the city owned public right -of -way. The project will not introduce any new fire hazards or generate population growth that would require an increase in fire or police protection services. The project would not result in an increase of population or housing in the project area. Therefore no new demand on local schools, parks or public facilities would occur. G: \PLANNING120101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 23 15. RECREATION. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 15.a. No Impact: The project would not result in an increase of population, which would increase the use of existing parks or other recreation facilities. Therefore. No impacts would occur. 15.b. No Impact: The proposed project does not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreation facilities. Therefore, no impacts would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 24 16. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? X b Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X X e Result in inadequate emergency access? f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Comments: 16.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would be constructed over time along roadways in the City of Temecula, ranging from major roadways to residential streets. It is expected that there will be short-term construction related impacts associated with the project. As a result, the Department of Public Works will require an encroachment permit, traffic control plan, and right -of way agreement to address the impacts and reduce them to a level of less than significant impact. 16.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Due to the low number of construction vehicles associated with two aerial crews and two underground work crews required by the proposed project, no changes in the level of service are anticipated. As mentioned above, short-term construction related impacts will be reduce to a level of Tess than significant through Public Works requirements for an encroachment permit, traffic control plan, and right -of way agreement. 16.c. No Impact: Construction and operational traffic associated with the proposed project is not expected to result in a change in air traffic patterns, including an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks given that the new steel light poles will be less than 40 feet high or the new antennas will be co- located on existing utility poles in the city owned public right -of -way. _16.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would result in trenching and laying of conduit, construction of new light poles, and aerial and underground installation of fiber optic cable, and installation of pull boxes and hand holes. This would result in potential lane closures, loss of access, and short-term traffic congestion. G:\PLANNING\20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 25 Again, the City will require an encroachment permit and traffic control plan to reduce the impacts to a level of less than significant. 16.e.f. No Impact: The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed project and have determined that that there will be no significant impacts to emergency access. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted plans, policies or programs regarding public transit, bicycle or pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G: \PLANNING12010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 26 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 17.a. No Impact: The project is within the publicly owned right -of -way in developed areas within the City of Temecula, which includes streets, curb, gutter, storm drain, sewer drain, and existing utility lines, such as power lines, telephone lines and cable television lines. The project would not generate a demand for water or wastewater treatment, and thus would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.b. No Impact: The project would not require or result in the expansion or construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.c. No Impact: During the construction of the proposed project, all ground disturbances would be limited to the previously developed, and publicly owned right -of way. To avoid impacts to the existing stormwater system, the applicant is planning to tunnel or bore under existing curbs and gutters where the project proposes to install underground fiber optic communication lines. Therefore, the project would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, and no impacts would occur. 17.d.e. No Impact: The project would not generate a demand for water or wastewater treatment. Therefore, the project would not cause a violation in wastewater treatment requirements, or require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.f.g No Impact: The project will generate a minimal amount of solid waste during construction. The project will include a condition of approval requiring the developer to contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 27 construction debris. The amount of solid waste generated by the project would not be substantial or interfere with the sufficient permitted capacity of nearby landfills and there would be no impact. G:IPLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 28 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X X No Impact a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? b c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: 18.a. Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in the sections above, the project would involve the construction of a utility system and would not significantly impact fish or wildlife resources, nor impact rare, threatened or endangered species. The proposed project with the inclusion of standard conditions of approval and permitting process would not significantly impact cultural or biological resources. 18.b. Less Than Significant Impact: No significant cumulative impacts have been identified with the implementation of the proposed project. 18.c. Less Than Significant Impact: No substantial environmental effects that would cause adverse effects on human beings have been identified. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 29 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. 19 a. The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System Map Sets were used as referenced source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street in Temecula. The Geographic Information System Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.orq. 19 b. There were no impacts that were previously addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis. 19 c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. City of Temecula Development Code 5. Supplemental Information provided by NewPath c/o Crown Castle as required by the City's Telecommunication Ordinance and Conditional Use Permit applications G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 30 Mitigation Monitoring Program NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project AESTHETICS General Impact: Mitigation Measures Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: AIR QUALITY General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Potentially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings New slim -line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street light pole to match existing street lights in the right -of -way. If a new street light is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim -line monopole with concrete street Tight base — minus the "cobra" light arm may be acceptable. In rural areas, where street lights don't exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete "street light" type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the planning application review and plan check process. Prior to issuance of a building permit Planning Department Short -term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction Implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM) • Minimize land disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: HAZARDS General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Planning staff will mitigation measure review and grading process. Prior to issuance construction Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department • Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials. verify compliance with the above as part of the planning application plan /encroachment permit plan check of associated permits and during Planning and Public Works Departments Directly or indirectly exposing people or structures to potential adverse effects from being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the building and grading plan check review process. Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Notice of Public Hearing PA11 -0119 Lena Hoffmeyer on behalf of Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high textured steel street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -28) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Sunny Meadows Drive, 155' northeast of Campanula Way. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers June 20, 2012 6:00 p.m. The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m.). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694 -6400. DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Lot Area: Total Floor Area /Ratio: Landscape Area /Coverage: Parking Required /Provided: STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2012 Eric Jones, Case Planner Planning Application No. PAl2 -0081, a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity to authorize a Type -47 ABC license for Temecula Lanes Bowling Alley, located at 27475 Jefferson Avenue Approve with Conditions Categorically Exempt Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities Alex Mann on Behalf of Tustin Lanes Properties, LLC. Community Commercial (CC) Community Commercial (CC) Site: Existing Commercial Structure /Community Commercial (CC) North: Existing Commercial Structure /Community Commercial (CC) South: Existing Commercial Structure /Community Commercial (CC) East: Jefferson Avenue, Existing Commercial Structure /Community Commercial (CC) West: Existing Storage Facility /Service Commercial (SC) Existinq /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required 2.73 Acres N/A N/A 570 Provided Via Reciprocal Parking Agreement 0.92 Acres N/A N/A 116 Required BACKGROUND SUMMARY On April 20, 2012, Alex Mann, on behalf of Tustin Lanes Properties, LLC, submitted Planning Application No. PAl2 -0081, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow a proposed bowling alley to have a Type -47 alcohol license. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Temecula Lanes will be a new bowling alley within an existing commercial shopping center. As part of their operations, the business will feature a restaurant for the use of bowlers. The business is applying for a Type -47 license from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). This license will allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for consumption on the premises. All consumption will take place inside the business. Hours of operations for the business will be Sunday through Thursday from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m., Friday from 10 a.m. to 2 a.m., and Saturday from 9 a.m. to 1 a.m. The bowling alley will be located within Census Tract 432.15. This Census Tract is over concentrated. ABC has indicated that two alcohol licenses are allowed and twenty currently exist. ABC is requiring an application for Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity since the restaurant is ancillary to the bowling alley. The applicant has submitted an application for Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on June 9, 2012 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities). A Type -47 license allowing for the on premise consumption of beer, wine, and distilled spirits is also common for bowling alleys. The use will be located in an existing building and only requires modifications to the interior of the existing structure. FINDINGS Conditional Use Permits (Section 17.04.010.E) The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The conditional use is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Both the General Plan and Development Code have anticipated bowling and restaurant uses within commercial zoning areas. In addition, the Development Code provides stipulations for uses proposing alcohol consumption. 2 The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures. The conditional use has also been reviewed by the City of Temecula Planning, Fire, Building and Safety, Public Works and Police Department to ensure the alcohol consumption will operate safely and not affect any adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The site for the conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features described in the City of Temecula Development Code as well as other governing regulations. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The use is consistent with the Development, Fire, and Building Codes, These codes contain provisions that will ensure for the protection of the health, safety and general welfare of the community. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the application has been based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (Section 17.10.020.6.9) Whether or not the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. Bowling alleys are a permitted use within Community Commercial zoning districts. Distilled spirit sales in conjunction with an allowable use must obtain the approval of a Conditional Use Permit to be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. Whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition and character of adjacent land uses. The use will allow a proposed bowling alley to serve alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption, This type of ancillary use is typical of businesses within commercially zoned districts. Therefore, the use is compatible with the nature, condition and character of adjacent land uses. 3 Whether or not the proposed use would have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses. The use has been determined to be consistent with the Development Code. This code contains provisions to ensure the protection of adjacent land uses. No adverse impacts to adjacent land uses are anticipated, Whether or not the proposed use would result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity The proposed use will be the first of its kind in the City of Temecula, Therefore, the use will not result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Statement of Operations Notice of Public Hearing 4 1 31 COWIP .1111m, Kitch V V n Area k i• TRASH BIN ACCESS x iiiilithit, .. MECHANICS AREA ... ._ E .. ' : - PARTY ROOM 1 311,311. h 71 _ .P.. 3. ..-- , WALK WAY I —1 WALK WAY r.r ... . :• . .,L_____ li i. ,4,. 14 . ' 4. PI VI Tt STTER -. 7 r a$ 111 MACHINE AR . 14. I , 1 .,.• — Bar Area — 'l . . BOWLING LANES 1[ DETAILS _nr ,• . ,...E., __.,--./ 1 ,'" 1 I.._..._1 ' _.-_,I , f '': AZ.IA. Ha.,[1...,ap Ar. m• APPROACH APPROACH szot APPROACH 1...v...1 V, .- Bowlers Area .—.114—. Remo ... .. , rt-1— ..LL . .._,,... : L. .:'. ..:.: . . . . FRONT DESK 1 ralr- . . ,., L.,....ti V.A.I. 1.12 ../........140 IIIIS ARM. ... WM/A CS Mil —.0.-=-.---. .. — .7 ■--- . . ... • ...• . ..- . •.. - . . • . 0 50 1 FT. .......................... 1 I I ...I I* MD Imo 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAl2 -0081, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY TO AUTHORIZE A TYPE -47 ABC LICENSE FOR TEMECULA LANES BOWLING ALLEY, LOCATED AT 27475 JEFFERSON AVENUE (APN 909- 240 -002) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 20, 2012, Alex Mann, on behalf of Tustin Lanes Properties, LLC, filed Planning Application No. PAl2 -0081, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on June 20, 2012, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PAl2 -0081 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Minor Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.010.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The conditional use is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Both the General Plan and Development Code have anticipated bowling and restaurant uses within commercial zoning areas. In addition, the Development Code provides stipulations for uses proposing alcohol consumption. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures; The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures. The conditional use has also been reviewed by the City of Temecula Planning, Fire, Building and Safety, Public Works and Police Department to ensure the alcohol consumption will operate safely and not affect any adjacent uses, buildings or structures. C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; The site for the conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features described in the City of Temecula Development Code as well as other governing regulations. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The use is consistent with the Development, Fire, and Building Codes. These codes contain provisions that will ensure for the protection of the health, safety and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the application has been based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity (Section 17.10.020.B.9) F. Whether or not the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; Bowling alleys are a permitted use within Community Commercial zoning districts. Distilled spirit sales in conjunction with an allowable use must obtain the approval of a Conditional Use Permit to be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. G. Whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition and character of adjacent land uses The use will allow a proposed bowling alley to serve alcoholic beverages for on- site consumption. This type of ancillary use is typical of businesses within commercially zoned districts. Therefore, the use is compatible with the nature, condition and character of adjacent land uses. H. Whether or not the proposed use would have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses; The use has been determined to be consistent with the Development Code. This code contains provisions to ensure the protection of adjacent land uses. No adverse impacts to adjacent land uses are anticipated. Whether or not the proposed use would result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity; The proposed use will be the first of its kind in the City of Temecula. Therefore, the use will not result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15301,Class 1 Existing Facilities); A Type -47 license allowing for the on premise consumption of beer, wine, and distilled spirits is also common for bowling alleys. The use will be located in an existing building. The use only requires alterations to the interior of the existing structure. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PAl2 -0081, a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity to authorize a Type -47 ABC license for Temecula Lanes Bowling Alley, located at 27475 Jefferson Avenue, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of June, 2012. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) Ron Guerriero, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 12- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of June 2012, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PAl2 -0081 Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Approval Date: June 20, 2012 Expiration Date: June 20, 2014 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. A Minor Conditional Use Permit and Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity to authorize a Type -47 ABC license for Temecula Lanes Bowling Alley, located at 27475 Jefferson Avenue 909- 240 -002 NIA (Existing Structure - No New Square Footage /Grading) N/A (Existing Structure - No New Square Footage) N/A (Existing Structure - No New Square Footage) Exempt (Non - Residential Project) The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated April 3, 2012, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -9. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -10. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -11. PL -12. Hours of operation for the facility shall be Sunday through Thursday from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m., Friday from 10 a.m. to 2 a.m., and Saturday from 9 a.m. to 1 a.m. PL -13. A solid roof cover for the trash enclosure servicing the bowling alley shall be approved and installed before the facility opens for business. PL -14. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. OUTSIDE AGENCIES An 8.5" x 11" (or larger) sign listing local transportation service providers and corresponding telephone numbers shall be posted at a conspicuous location within the building. Information to assist in the compilation of this sign may be obtained through the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce (951- 676 - 5090). PL -15. The applicant shall comply with the requirements set forth by the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health for food service. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. Applicant has applied for a Type 47 On -Sale, General — Eating Place (Restaurant) license, which authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption on the licensed premises and authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the licensed premises. Applicant must operate and maintain the licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. Minors are allowed on the premises. PD -2. Applicant will familiarize employees with City Municipal Code 9.12.020 (Curfew Established) TMC Curfew for minors. Applicant should have in plain view a sign stating the curfew law, so that every patron will be knowledgeable about the law. PD -3. Applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. PD -4. Applicant must complete a LEAD training either given by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, or an ABC certified equivalent course. PD -5. Applicant shall ensure that no alcohol is sold to or consumed by any person under the age of 21. PD -6. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: (a) valid California driver's license; (b) valid California identification card; (c) valid military identification card ( active /reserve /retired /dependent); (d) valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency. PD -7. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with Section 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B &P), which includes the following requirements: (a) name of person; (b) date of birth; (c) physical description; (d) photograph; (e) currently valid (not expired). It is the responsibility of the business owner and any person who serves or sells alcohol to be aware of current laws and regulations pertaining to alcoholic beverages. PD -8. Sections 24200.5 (b) and 25657 (a) (b) B &P; Rule 143 CCR: Section 303 (a) (PC): On- sale licensees may not: (a) employ hosts, hostesses, or entertainers who solicit others to buythem drinks, alcoholic or non - alcoholic; (b) pay or agree to pay such an employee a percentage of the receipts from the sales of drinks solicited; (c) permit any person whether an employee or not, to loiter for the purpose of soliciting an alcoholic drink. PD -9. Type 41, 47 and 49 licensees must operate and maintain their licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. They must make actual and substantial sale of meals, during the normal meal hours that they are open, at least five days a week. Normal meal hours are: breakfast 6:00 a.m. — 9:00 a.m., lunch 11:00 a.m. — 2:00 p.m., and dinner 6:00 p.m. — 9:00 p.m. Premises that are not open five days a week must serve meals on the days they are open. The premises must be equipped and maintained in good faith. This means the premises must possess working refrigeration and cooking devices, pots, pans, utensils, table service, condiment dispensers, menus, posters, signs, and enough goods to make substantial meals. The premises must complywith all regulations of the local health department. Incidental, sporadic or infrequent sales of meals or a mere offering of meals without actual sales is not compliance. "Meals" means the usual assortment of food commonly ordered at various hours of the day. The service of only sandwiches or salads is not considered compliance. However, certain specialty entrees, such as pizza, fish or ribs, and an assortment of other foods, such as soups, salads or desserts, may be considered a meal. The Department will presume that a licensee is operating as a bona fide eating place if the gross sales of food prepared and sold to guests on the premises exceeds the gross sales of alcoholic beverages. "Prepared" means any processing preliminary to the final serving of food. (Note: Some licensees have a "conditional" license that requires food sales to be 50% or more of the total gross sales Sections 23038 and 23787 B &P). PD -10. Licensees may not sell, give, or deliver alcohol (bythe drink or bythe package) between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the same day. No person may knowingly purchase alcohol between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. (Section 25631 B &P Code). Licensees may not permit patrons or employees to consume alcohol between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the same day (even if someone bought the drinks before 2:00 a.m. Section 25632 B &P). Some ABC licenses have special conditions (restrictions) as to hours of sale that are stricter that the law. Those licenses are marked "Conditional" (23805 B &P). PD -11. Police officers, sheriff's deputies and ABC investigators are sworn law enforcement officers (peace officers) with powers of arrest. Whether in plainclothes or uniform, peace officers have the legal right to visit and inspect any licensed premises at anytime during business hours without a search warrant or probable cause. This includes inspecting the bar and back bar, store room, office, closed or locked cabinets, safes, kitchen, or any other area within the licensed premises. It is legal and reasonable for licensees to exclude the public from some areas of the premises. However, licensees cannot and must not deny entry to, resist, delay, obstruct, or assault a peace officer (Sections 25616, 25753, and 25755 B &P; 148 and 241 (b) PC). PD -12. Licensees may not permit their licensed premises to become a disorderly house. A disorderly house is a licensed outlet (on or off sale) that: (a) disturbs neighbors with noise, loud music, loitering, littering, vandalism, urination or defecation, graffiti, etc; and /or (b) has many ongoing crimes inside such as drunks, fights, assaults, prostitution narcotics, etc. The licensed premises area includes the parking lot ( Sections 24200 (a) (B &P) and 25601 B &P; 316 PC). PD -13. Applicant shall ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages are trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department provides free training for all employees involved in the service and sales of alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a training session for all new employees. Contact the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506 -5131. PD -14. Events where entertainment is to be provided must abide bythe following rules: (1) No licensee shall permit any person to perform acts of, or acts which simulate; (a) sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation, flagellation or any sexual acts which are prohibited by law; (b) the touching, caressing or fondling of the breasts, buttocks, anus or genitals; (c) the displaying of the pubic hair, anus, vulva or genitals; and, (2) Subject to the provisions of subdivision (1) hereof, entertainers whose breasts and /or buttocks are exposed to view shall perform only upon a stage at least 18 inches above the immediate floor level and removed at least six feet from the nearest patron. No licensee shall permit any person to remain in or upon the licensed premises who exposes to public view any portion of his or her genitals or anus (Rule 143.3 CCR. Also violates Section 311.6 PC if conduct is `obscene ". PD -15. Applicant will be responsible for any cost incurred bythe Police Department if additional officers are required because of traffic problems /congestion, public disturbance or where the need for police presence is required. PD -16. Applicant will ensure no loitering occurs on or adjacent to its premises during hours of operation. PD -17. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506 -5131. Temecula Lanes, Inc. 27475 Jefferson Ave. Temecula, CA 92590 909 - 964 -7843 Cell Statement of Operations Equipment : Bowling Machines, Bowling Lanes, Lighting, Scoring System, Beer and Liquor Dispenser, Food Counter, Cooking Area, Refrigerator, Televisions, Chairs, and Tables. Hours of Operation: Sun — Thursday 10am -10pm, Friday 10am — 2am, Saturday gam — lam Employees: 15 — 20 Part -Time Employees, 10 -15 Full Time Employees Estimated Max Occupancy: 300 -400 people Number of Parking Spaces: Common Area Parking has approx. 650 Parking Spaces Food Provided: Yes Liquor Provided: Yes 4/3/12 Music: Music will be played during the course of business, however not to the levels of "loud" or "rock concert." Structures to be provided: The customers will be inside the bowling facility. No outside lighting, fencing, signs will be needed. ADA paths: Restrooms, Parking Lot and General Bowling Area will be ADA compliant. Alex Mann 909 - 964 -7843 Amendment 1 1. Music shall be pre- recorded. Statement of Operation Dated: 5/21/12 Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: PAl2 -0081 Alex Mann on Behalf of Tustin Lanes Properties, LLC A Minor Conditional Use Permit and Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity to authorize a Type -47 ABC license for Temecula Lanes Bowling Alley, located at 27475 Jefferson Avenue In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) Eric Jones, (951) 506 -5115 City of Temecula, Council Chambers June 20, 2012 6:00 p.m. T.V \ • ■ t C:\Program Files (x86)1Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp11583.doc Notice of Public Hearing The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m.). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694 -6400.