Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
041713 PC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET APRIL 17, 2013 — 6:00 PM PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: PUBLIC COMMENTS Earlene Bundy Commissioner Kight Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio Next in Order: Resolution: 13-11 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three-minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of April 3, 2013 1 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 CONTINUED FROM APRIL 3, 2013: Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, PA11- 0275, PA11-0277, a Zone Change to change the zoning from Professional Office to Planned Development Overlay 13 (PDO -13) to create zoning and residential development standards, a Development Plan to construct a two phase residential project on a 22.73 acre site consisting of a 325 apartment unit complex and associated amenities (Phase I) and 49 age restricted single-family units (Phase II), and a Tentative Tract Map to create 49 age restricted lots and 7 lots that will comprise the apartment unit complex, located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11- 0276, A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY 13 (PDO -13) ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003)" 2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11- 0277, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 57 LOTS FROM THREE EXISTING PARCELS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST 2 CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APN 961- 450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003)" 2.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11- 0275, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-PHASE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE. PHASE ONE WILL CONSIST OF A 325 APARTMENT UNIT COMPLEX AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES. PHASE TWO OF THE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF 49 AGE RESTRICTED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003)" 2.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (PA11-0275, PA11-0276, PA11-0277) (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003)" 3 Planning Application Nos. PA12-0226 and PA12-0227, a Major Modification to allow a reduction in the number of buildings (from three totaling 65,640 square feet to two totaling 54,860 square feet) and a revision of the architecture for a previously approved Development Plan, and a Minor Exception to increase the height of the Halcon Rojo Medical office complex by 3'-3", located on the north side of Temecula Parkway, approximately 400 feet east of the Jedediah Smith and Temecula Parkway intersection, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA12-0226 AND PA12-0227, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF BUILDINGS (FROM THREE TOTALING 65,640 SQUARE FEET TO TWO TOTALING 54,860 SQUARE FEET) AND A REVISION OF THE ARCHITECTURE FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND A MINOR EXCEPTION TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF THE HALCON ROJO MEDICAL OFFICE COMPLEX BY 3'-3", LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF THE JEDEDIAH SMITH AND TEMECULA PARKWAY INTERSECTION (APN 959-060-007) 4 Planning Application No. PA13-0022, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -07) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Date Street approximately 440 feet west of the centerline of Kingwood Road, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA13-0022, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH TEXTURED STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TP -07) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DATE STREET APPROXIMATELY 440 FEET WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF KINGWOOD ROAD 5 Planning Application No. PA12-0233, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -20) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the southeast corner of Redhawk Parkway and El Chimisal Road, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0233, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH TEXTURED STREET LIGHT POLE AS PRT OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TP -20) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER 4 OF REDHAWK PARKWAY AND EL CHIMISAL ROAD 6 Planning Application No. PA12-0234, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -21) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Regina Drive, approximately 195 feet east of the center line of Valentino Way, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0234, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH TEXTURED STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TP -21) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF REGINA DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 195 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF VALENTINO WAY 7 Planning Application No. PA12-0235, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -23) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Redhawk Parkway, approximately 15 feet west of the center line of Callesito Vallarts, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0235, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TP -23) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF REDHAWK PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 15 FEET WEST OF THE CENTER LINE OF CALLESITO VALLARTA 8 Planning Application No. PA12-0237, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -26) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Redhawk Parkway, approximately 101 feet east of the centerline of Via Puebla, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 5 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0237, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TP -26) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF REDHAWK PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 101 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF VIA PUEBLA REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, May 1, 2013, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material may be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at the Temecula Civic Center, (951) 694-6400. 6 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET APRIL 3, 2013 — 6:00 PM PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: Earlene Bundy Commissioner Harter Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio 1.1 Next in Order: Resolution: 13-07 Approve the Action Minutes of March 20, 2013 APPROVED 4-0-0-1; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; CAREY ABSTAINED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 CONTINUED FROM MARCH 20, 2013: Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, PA11- 0275, PA11-0277, a Zone Change to change the zoning from Professional Office to Planned Development Overlay 13 (PDO -13) to create zoning and residential development standards, a Development Plan to construct a two phase residential project on a 22.73 acre site consisting of a 325 apartment unit complex and associated amenities (Phase I) and 49 age restricted single-family units (Phase II), and a Tentative Tract Map to create 49 age restricted lots and 7 lots that will comprise the apartment unit complex, located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road, Eric Jones 1 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 To be continued CONTINUED TO APRIL 17, 2013, APPROVED 5-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL Daniel Oxley, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Mary Towel!, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Mrs. Lewis, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission 3 Planning Application Nos. PA12-0190, PA12-0191, a Major Modification to allow a new 13,500 square foot storage structure to be placed within an existing storage facility and to allow the relocation of RV parking spaces, and a Minor Exception for a 3.7 foot yard area reduction for the recreation vehicles storage and a 9.2% reduction in the required landscape area for the site, located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Road, Kenny Taylor APPROVED 5-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA12-0190 AND PA12-0191, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO ALLOW A NEW 13,500 SQUARE FOOT, SINGLE -STORY STORAGE STRUCTURE IN PLACE OF A 21,000 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY STRUCTURE TO BE PLACED WITHIN AN EXISTING STORAGE FACILITY AND TO ALLOW THE RELOCATION OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE SPACES, AND A MINOR EXCEPTION FOR A 3.7 FOOT YARD AREA REDUCTION FOR THE RECREATION VEHICLES STORAGE AND A 9.2% REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE SITE, LOCATED AT 43920 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD (APN 966-010-008) 4 Planning Application No. PA13-0016, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured steel street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -10) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the east side of Crowne Hill Drive, approximately 156 feet south of Pauba Road, Matt Peters APPROVED 5-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 2 RESOLUTION NO. 13-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA13-0016, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH TEXTURED STEEL STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -10) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY, APPROXIMATELY 156 FEET SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD 5 Planning Application No. PA12-0127, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured steel street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -18) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Agena Street, approximately 345 feet west of Southern Cross Road, Matt Peters APPROVED 5-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0127, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH TEXTURED STEEL STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -18) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AGENA STREET, APPROXIMATELY 345 FEET WEST OF SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD Julia Szotyori, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Wayne Hall, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission 6 Planning Application No. PA13-0023, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 45 -foot high wood utility pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -30) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Avenida Buena Suerte, approximately 540 feet east of Avenida Centenario, Matt Peters APPROVED 5-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 3 RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA13-0023, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 45 - FOOT HIGH WOOD UTILITY POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -30) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE, APPROXIMATELY 540 FEET EAST OF AVENIDA CENTENARIO REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Wednesday, April 17, 2013, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. John Telesio Chairman 4 Patrick Richardson Director of Community Development CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Eric Jones, Case Planner DATE: April 17, 2013 SUBJECT: Bella Linda (PA11-0275, PA11-0276, PA11-0277) A proposed Zone Change!PDO, Tentative Tract Map, and Development Plan for property generally located on the north east corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road were reviewed by the Planning Commission at the March 20, 2013 hearing. The Planning Commissioners requested that the applicant provide a method to ensure construction of the age restricted, single-family homes and provide architectural enhancements for the project and continued the hearing to April 3, 2013, to allow the applicant an opportunity to address these concerns. Several Planning Commissioners raised concerns about the density of the apartment component of the Planned Development Overlay (PDO). While the PDO has an overall density of 16.5 units per acre, if the apartment development was a stand-alone development it would have a density of 24.27 per acre. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related tom density, the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. The applicant proposes the following Condition of Approval to ensure the single-family age restricted units are constructed: PL -40 The following must be completed prior to issuance of building permits for the first multi- family dwelling unit to ensure the construction of the 49 age restricted single-family units; • Record Final Map to include all grading and infrastructure plans of both communities. • Grading, utility, and main road work for both communities shall be done in one phase or in two phases with the age restricted, single-family community done first. • Single Family Private Street A will be completed and all of the 49 age restricted single- family pads shall be graded to finish elevation. • All infrastructure for utilities for all of the 49 age restricted single-family lots shall be installed. • Perimeter fencing, entry gate, and monument walls for the 49 single-family age restricted lots shall be installed. • The applicant shall pursue and obtain building permits for at least 16 of the age restricted single-family dwelling units, or the applicant may post securities as approved by the Director of Community Development for all of the 49 age restricted single-family dwelling units. C:1Program Files (x86)1Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp13900.doc The Planning Commission expressed concern related to the architecture of the Monterey architectural elevation and the garage structures that are along Pechanga Parkway. The applicant has proposed to improve the Monterey elevations by providing additional building pop - outs with gables, and additional adobe stone. The garage elevations have been revised by including an additional gable element and spandrel glass features. With regard to the apartment density, staff asked the developer to explore the option of reducing the number of apartments so that portion of the project would have a density of not more than 20 units per acre. The developer responded that this would riot be economically feasible unless all of the proposed off-site improvements were eliminated. Staff responded that the off-site improvements were instrumental in the staff's recommendation of approval for the project. Staff also responded to the applicant that these are economic issues not land use issues, and are generally riot a Planning Commission consideration. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Revised Plan Reductions PC Resolution — Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay Exhibit A — City Council Ordinance Exhibit B — Planned Development Overlay PC Resolution — Tentative Tract Map Exhibit A — City Council Resolution Exhibit B — Draft Conditions of Approval PC Resolution — Development Plan Exhibit A — City Council Resolution Exhibit B — Draft Conditions of Approval PC Resolution — Environmental Impact Report, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Statement of Overriding Considerations Exhibit A — City Council Resolution Exhibit B — Finding of Facts in Support of Findings Public Correspondence Public Outreach Planning Commission March 20, 2013 Staff Report C:1Program Files (x86)1Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp13900.doc a — I CA�R��Ci �VgZLE:300 RIO•_-- �1P Project Site .. 4) ...., .. et/ 2 �► iNol ii. rut MIB11 ��' 14, ?..° %Ifli W Air Wal. Maw Van 0 EM Ell ME MI cell.°el* I�1M�j 11111111. d = w���'�I )1111 AI. VII WI # 1. '4'44- re. 11 I ICU 10 MO 10 o. ,w ,ONN 0 500 1,uuu Feet LEFT ELEVATION - MONTEREY STYLE SCALE: 1/0'. RIGHT ELEVATION - MONTEREY STYLE SCALE 1A'= FRONT ELEVATION - MONTEREY STYLE SCALE: IE 1'd' REAR ELEVATION - MONTEREY STYLE SCALE: IA' • 1'd' BELLA LINDA TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP BUILDING C 23.PLDC APARTMENT ELEVATIONS - MONTEREY M]+ 13 P*O*CI70 .7. 1,7,CA 51711 711,170,. 1111 A1.lOa LEFT ELEVATION • MONTEREY STYLE SCALE: 1t LLB' RIGHT ELEVATION • MONTEREY STYLE SCALE: Mr. i'0' BELLA LINDA TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA FRONT ELEVATION - MONTEREY STYLE SCALE: WB'=1.0' REAR ELEVATION - MONTEREY STYLE SCALE: W • 10' BUILDING C 23 -FLEX APARTMENT ELEVATIONS -MONTEREY 0327 13 9140110 W1 MI 031 COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP NOtimosi 03 UM.T.Iir th.yu.=0.A �TTMW m.n A1.10a 0 0 O 0_13 0 sr4- Ia IIIA LEFT SIDE .A- 41• RIGHT SIDE SECTION W COLOR SCHEME 1 KEYNOTES]] 11 •••••=6.1.11 •••••• • IP••nr•w• i •••moi •ww"'1°'•= • •_•••1w•.wI M WM..••1•1Oi.W.1.t1.M COLOR SCHEME 1 EXTERIOR LIGHTING KEYNOTES]] ~ M•••••w M▪ et w♦ M••• AMM. WNW MM. RIM Ma N..••. wW M. Me domNM, POI 1.. RAN Mr •ow504 r .0 ••or•uw _ COLOR SCHEME 1111. CLIM•MRAM 5M1141_ ww• MAMMY .••.•••M _OSA , MN Mt X11 • w NW 1:141•14 IMAM 610,••• �.... MON 1.111110 W IMP Ma.i • •�•1•I•••1•sP•W •,==.11.1.• MORI +,•.rw'owxawn 01 �0•w•.a ORAPPRIM• OINK 0 0 0 0 0 oQ 00 REAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MW= • • O .] • 000 111••o i•MII I•i.•1.1 -I*•i•I . •I•1•1•LI=I!Ip1 • ..5.. `•• .. •••• o•• 1-1-1-1-1 • • • • [LOA! CI • • • NI m -- o••a MIM LL•• •-•MI 0000 0000 0000 000 0 11 •MIu 0000 0000 0000 0000 0• ••MI• 00 0000 0000 1 0000 0000 FRONT 3 TYPICAL DETACHED 11 -CAR ROOF PLAN N M w ... .. .. ... ... .. M j <13/ glow - -"mini 1 ._ __ 1-.-1 ��,ARAG �GARAG ff II 11 �EU + A' G GARAG, RAG JLrJL1Ij?'u ----, - -I-y-- - -- Mit TYPICAL DETACHED 11 -CAR GARAGE PLAN BELLA LINDA TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP DETACHED 11 -CAR GARAGE MANS, ELEVATIONS & SECTION • C. 7713 1mIK1 HO, 1011'1:01 11111111211111111. 213.•..._.•... ,l., 347rwe.tw 0.M.3Jr )H.11 ✓wpn •Wl G•}Y• N R•fWl W1•Ti/w_010 w..a..R •1.•..•• MN•.>C••DIM A5.1 • o p ■ O 3 00 0 OO o n C n F,4;Mi+IR,l,t►dJ1aA1,.4,•..r•••Aln n ZOWZ,Ro-Rr,.At.•a4,aMN.,4.,.a..4.8016.11.1•••• •'414M. WMWWWA"NMMM il31uU.1^rF.NM44Jiire- 4aAa • a aa a a a.• •. • Aa a"y,AyC ..a a.a • ...•.• 11 444 42d• r�tenomma4...sowootrAAAa,AJ+, TN ;Liz 41111111111111144•4111111141•11.12.,!‘!...- -,,,...,g, 1 "•z�..• ":•• a44RAI�a .�iR 44 i�•.,N4.iiui►iRiitAili4NwMi�tNJOt►iM�4►i►ifYWjipi►iai►iMti►i►iwi,i►i4u,............,a. r.........,.. r ....".t .. t. ,.M44.M .O►•WtWN,VM..M A•'GA aill";►d h,aa►.a.a.. ..n►..0 r..ar•.• ma a a.••� ►'a 0y" 'r0`►raja0 44M.WtRMRaaA.AMooRaaA. ..• ■•a.r•yam �N19_Adele +1M . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 REAR GARAGE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8".1'.0' BELLA LINDA TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA BUILDING C 23 -PEEL APARTMEM ELEVATIONS • MONTEREY 011.13 ACT IC..01401 COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP «.iw.n unuo A1.lOa GARAGE ELEVATION SCALE IA' • 1'4' BELLA LINDA TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP BUILDING C 294LEX APARTMENT ELEVATIONS • MONTEREY 112113 .Oaa(tIWMI Como A1.10a PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0276, A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY 13 (PDO -13) ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD" (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. D. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 17, 2013 and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending the approval of the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Zone Change Planning Application No. PA11-0276 is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and Development Code; The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the existing General Plan land use designation for the property. Planned Development Overlay -13 will establish the design and development framework for the project. As proposed and conditioned, the project design will be consist with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Zone Change Application, PA11-0276: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Zone Change Application, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and an EIR was prepared. B. On April 12, 2012, a Notice of Preparation was released to all agencies and persons that might be affected by the project. C. On April 30, 2012, a scoping session was held at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), City staff prepared an (EIR) analyzing the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Zone Change and associated applications ("the Project"), as described in the EIR. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared. E. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available to public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. F. Seven written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. The Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR and corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations and all comments received regarding these documents prior to and at the March 20, 2013 public hearing and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with regard to temporary construction noise; and (3) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 13 - recommending that the City Council certify the new Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Project. Section 4. Recommendations. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Planning Application No. PA11- 0276, a Zone Change to change the zoning from Professional Office to Planned Development Overlay -13 (PDO -13) and to add Sections 17.22.240 through 17.22.254 of PDO -13 to the Temecula Municipal Code to create zoning and residential development standards in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of April, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary ORDINANCE NO. 13 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0276, A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY 13 (PDO -13) ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, and in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On April 17, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277 a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275 Development Plan. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available to public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. E. On March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on March 20, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. F. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. G. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared for the Project. H. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan. I. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to and at the public hearing. J. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 13 - adopting the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. K. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: Zone Change A. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and Development Code; The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the proposed land use designation for the property. Planned Development Overlay 13 will establish the design and development framework for the project. As proposed and conditioned, the project design will be consist with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Council hereby amends the existing Zoning Map on file with the City of Temecula City Clerk's office and approves the proposed Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay 13 (PDO -13) and adopts Sections 17.22.240 through 17.22.254 including the PDO -13 Text and Development Standards in the form attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit A. Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , 2013. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 13- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2013, the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk Bella Linda PDO -13 Prepared For: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 951.694.6444 Property Owner: Coyne Development/Waypoint Property 1400 Quail Street, Suite 260 Newport Beach, CA 92660 949.300.9632 Prepared By: MDMG 41635 Enterprise Circle North, Suite B Temecula, CA 92590 951.296.3466 In conjunction with: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services Dahlin Group Architecture Planning The Alhambra Group RBF Consulting June 2012 Bella Linda Table of Contents 17.22.240 TITLE 3 17.22.242 PURPOSE 3 17.22.244 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN STANDARDS 3 17.22.246 USE REGULATIONS 3 17.22.248 SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN AND SETBACK STANDARDS 4 17.22.250 PROJECT SETTING 5 A. Setting and Location 5 B. Existing Site Conditions 5 C. Surrounding Land Uses and Development 5 17.22.252 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6 A. Design Style 6 B. General Site Design 6 C. Apartment Site Design 7 D. Courtyard Site Design 7 E. Articulation of Design Facades 9 F. Styles 9 G. Streetscape 15 H. Massing and Scale 16 I. Materials, Finishes & Details 16 J. Varied Roof Planes 18 K. Garage/Carport Location and Design 18 L. Lighting 20 M. Trash Enclosures 21 N. Mail Boxes 22 O. Address Lettering 22 P. Mechanical Equipment & Vents 23 17.22.254 LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS 24 A. Landscape Elements 24 B. Streetscenes 27 C. Hardscape 33 D. Entry Monumentation 33 E. Walls and Fences 33 F. Private Recreation Area 41 G. Arbors 41 H. Parks/Open Space 41 Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 1 Bella Linda List of Figures Figure 1 Overall Landscape Plan 25 Figure la Plant Palette 26 Figure 2 Courtyard Street 29 Figure 3 Internal Courtyard 30 Figure 4 Apartments 31 Figure 5 Pechanga Parkway 32 Figure 6 Loma Linda Road 32 Figure 7 Temecula Lane 32 Figure 8 Walkways/ Roadways 35 Figure 9 Entry Monumentation Plan 36 Figure 10 Entry Monumentation Elevations 37 Figure 11 Wall and Fence Plan 38 Figure 12 Security Gate Details 39 Figure 13 Pechanga and Loma Linda Wall Elevation 40 Figure 14 Private Recreation Area Plans 42 Figure 15 Private Recreation Area Elevations 43 Figure 16 Parks/Open Space Overall Plan 44 Figure 17 Parks/Open Space Bioswale Plan 44 Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 2 Bella Linda 17.22.240 TITLE Section 17.22.240 through 17.22.254 shall be known as "PDO -13" (Bella Linda Planned Development Overlay District). (Ord ) 17.22.242 PURPOSE The purpose of the Bella Linda Planned Development Overlay District ("PDO -13") is to permit creative mixtures of uses in smaller areas where a specific plan or the village center overlay is not appropriate. The planned development overlay zoning district is intended to provide a mechanism to allow for flexibility in the development regulations and design standards and to allow mixtures of uses and clustering of land uses that are traditionally prohibited by conventional zoning. Through this flexibility in standards, many of the objectives of the general plan can best be achieved. The current zoning on the site is Professional Office (PO). These requirements are intended to provide regulations for the development of attached and detached residential development including senior motor court housing and multi- family apartments within the City. 17.22.244 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN STANDARDS A. The permitted uses for the Bella Linda Planned Development Overlay District are described in Section 17.22.246. In addition, the Medium (M) and High Density (H) residential uses permitted in Table 17.06.030 of the Development Code will be allowed in the Courtyard Housing and Apartment portions of PDO -13, respectively. B. Except as modified by the provisions of section 17.22.248 the following rules and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area: 1. The Citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. 2. The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that are in effect at the time the application is deemed complete. 3. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. (Ord. 07-03 § 3) 17.22.246 USE REGULATIONS The Bella Linda Planned Development Overlay District (PDO -13) located between Temecula Lane and Pechanga Parkway just north of Loma Linda Road, is intended to provide for the development of up to 49 single-family detached homes on fee -simple lots on approximately 6.65 acres with a proposed density of 7.4 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and 325 apartments on 13.2 acres with a proposed density of 24.0 du/ac. The overall density allowed in PDO -13 is 18.5 du/ac. PDO -13 is comprised entirely of private residential land uses designed to enhance housing opportunities and develop a common community theme. PDO -13 will provide housing opportunities to those meeting a minimum age of 55. PDO -13 is consistent with the City's General Plan Policies by promoting equal housing opportunities and will provide for a visually pleasing environment through adoption of supplemental performance standards that have been provided to ensure compatibility with the Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 3 Bella Linda adjacent neighborhoods. A subsequent Home Product Review application shall be submitted on the single-family development. 17.22.248 SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN AND SETBACK STANDARDS The residential component shall comply with the development standards set forth in the Table below. Table Residential Development Standards Bella Linda Planned Development Overlay District Residential Development Standards PDO -13 LOT AREA APARTMENTS COURTYARD HOUSING Minimum net lot area (square feet) - 3600 S.F. Maximum number of dwelling units per gross acre 25 8 LOT DIMENSIONS Minimum average width 20' 60' 1 Minimum lot depth 40' 60' 1 BUILDING SETBACKS Minimum front yard 8' 8' 2 Minimum corner side yard 12' 5' 2 Minimum interior side yard Variable 3 5' Minimum rear yard - 5' 4 Minimum building separation 10' 10' OTHER REQUIREMENTS Lot Coverage 35 35 Maximum height 40' 35' 5 Open space required 29% 20% Private open space square feet/per unit 150 200 Notes: 1 Property line goes to centerline of driveway. 2 Measured from back of curb. 3 The combined interior side yard setbacks shall not be less than ten feet and the distance between adjacent structures shall not be less than ten feet. This is intended to permit a zero lot line arrangement with a zero setback on one side yard and ten feet on the opposite side yard. 4 Measured from rear of building to rear of private open space easement. 5 Two-story homes are not allowed along the adjacent property line with the existing single-family homes to the north of the PDO -13. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 4 Bella Linda 17.22.250 PROJECT SETTING A. Setting and Location PDO -13 is comprised of approximately 20.18 acres located between Temecula Lane and Pechanga Parkway just north of Loma Linda Road. B. Existing Site Conditions The site is currently vacant and undeveloped. Remnants of former developments are still present on the site (Le., access roads, wooden building frame, culverts and retaining wall, landscaping, and manmade pond with decorative rock waterfall). As it is the only undeveloped property in the surrounding area, the trees provide the only stature on an otherwise level surface. Site topography is basically flat -lying and featureless. It has been altered in the past by grading. An earthen berm and a few stockpiles of excavated earth materials are present in the southern portion of the site. Elevation ranges from a high of about 1030 feet throughout the majority of the site to a low of 1020 feet in the northwest corner. Overall, the site slopes gently downward towards the northwest corner. C. Surrounding Land Uses and Development PDO -13 is bordered with open space (Pala Community Park and Temecula Creek) and single-family residential to the north, and single-family residential to the south, east and west (Low -Medium Density). Site Aerial Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 5 Bella Linda 17.22.252 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Design Style The architecture for PDO -13 site shall comply with the City's Municipal Code requirements contained in Sections 17.06.070.0 (Single -Family Detached Residential Developments) and 17.06.070.D (Multiple -Family or Attached Single -Family Residential Developments). The purpose of residential architectural guidelines is to provide guidance for the development within PDO -13. The preferred architectural styles for PDO -13 are: Spanish Eclectic, Spanish Colonial and Monterey. These architectural styles may apply to both the single-family and multiple family components of PDO -13. While these architectural styles are "preferred" in PDO -13, the design criteria is not meant to be restrictive, but rather to encourage a higher level of design direction and quality within the Spanish vernacular. The two types of residential products permitted in PDO -13 are discussed in greater detail below. 1. Courtyard Homes: The courtyard home is a unique style of home in that it functions as a traditional single-family detached home but the garage entrances are located off a shared, central courtyard -style driveway. Homes that are internal to the courtyard have their front door off the court while homes located adjacent to the street have a front door that faces the street. 2. Apartments: The townhome apartments are groupings of three or more housing units attached in a row, with shallow front yard setbacks and no rear yard as the garage is accessed from the rear of the home. This type of home is a wonderful addition when faced towards the street or towards an internal paseo as it adds vibrancy and a visual statement to the land. The apartments are an efficient use of available land and provide a range of housing opportunities for residents wanting to live in the Bella Linda community. The apartments at Bella Linda have varied configurations but are small enough to maintain a relatively intimately scaled and hospitable setting. Parking may be provided in carports, or garages located in proximity to each building, or as tuck under parking. B. General Site Design Various site plan elements and architectural elements/concepts shall be considered to create a quality neighborhood. These can include street trees, pedestrian connectivity, varied roof heights and pitches, color palettes and building materials that reflect the architectural style. The design criteria and architectural style is not meant to be restrictive, but rather to encourage a higher level of design direction and quality. Site Plan elements that shall be considered to produce a great neighborhood include: • Street trees • Pedestrian connectivity • Variable lot setbacks Architectural elements/concepts that shall be considered to create a quality neighborhood include: Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 6 Bella Linda • Architecture forward • Varied garage placement • 360° Architecture • Varied roof heights and pitches • Color palettes and building materials that reflect the architectural style C. Apartment Site Design Appropriate building siting can reduce the perceived density of multi -family development, maximize open space areas, provide "eyes" on the street, and enhance a sense of community by providing attractive and desirable spaces where people may gather and interact. • Ensure that residential buildings relate appropriately to surrounding land uses and streets through the use of complementary building arrangements, buffers, and avoidance of overwhelming building scale and visual obstructions. • Use courtyard siting arrangements, where appropriate, to complement similar siting in the area. • Use landscaping that complements existing landscape materials, location and massing on adjacent development. • Relate directly to the adjacent street and create a cohesive visual identity for the neighborhood and an attractive street scene for the passerby. • Promote efficient site layout in terms of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns. • Buildings shall be grouped to form distinct areas. • When possible, organize buildings around a common open space or courtyard. • Building shall have a street orientation parallel to primary perimeter streets, and provide setback variation to provide visual interest. • Portions of the development that are not parallel to the street shall be well integrated into the project's overall site design. D. Courtyard Site Design Appropriate building siting will allow the location of multiple single-family units closely plotted in proximity to each other. This type of development will provide for efficiencies in terms of driveways, entries and private spaces, while creating an attractive and functional street scene. • Residential buildings shall utilize a common driveway. • Building entries (for the units fronting the street) shall front the street. • Building entries shall be located off of the common driveway for units in the rear of the courtyard. • Guest parking shall be provided off of the common driveway. • Private yard areas shall be provided for each unit and shall not be adjacent to another private yard area within the courtyard. • Units shall be plotted and situated within the courtyard design to allow for maximum privacy between the units. • Adequate landscape buffers shall be provided between the units and any adjacent courtyard clusters. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 7 Bella Linda • Building shall have a street orientation parallel to primary perimeter streets, and provide setback variation to provide visual interest. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 8 Bella Linda E. Articulation of Design Facades • The building design shall incorporate 360° architecture. • Architectural elements that add interest and character to the prescribed architectural styles, such as recessed windows, shall be provided. • High quality materials shall be used to create a look of permanence within PDO - 13. Variations in color and material will be used in order to create interest and reduce a monotonous appearance. • Color palettes will be selected per the architectural style. Colors chosen for trim, windows, doors, and architectural elements will complement the material choices. • Fixtures and finishes will be selected for their contribution to the overall theme of the development. • Duplication of similar architectural styles shall not be permitted when adjacent to, across from or like architectural styles in the Courtyard product. The building design shall incorporate 360° architecture. 360° architecture means the appropriate articulation of all building facades, including variation in massing, roof forms, and wall planes, as well as surface articulation to create shadow patterns and massing shapes that contribute to a building's character. It is expected that the highest level of articulation will occur on the front facade and facades visible from streets; however, similar and complementary massing, materials, and details are encouraged to be incorporated into the other building elevations. The use of elements such as overhangs, trellises, and awnings will be used to lend character to the building. Architectural elements that add interest and character, such as porches, balconies, and recessed windows shall be provided. High quality materials shall be used to create a look of permanence within PDO -13. Variations in color and material will be used in order to create interest and reduce a monotonous appearance. Color palettes will be selected per styles. Colors chosen for trim, windows, doors, and architectural elements will complement the siding and material choices. Fixtures and finishes will be selected for their contribution to the overall theme of the development. All single family dwellings will provide fire sprinklers in accordance with requirements of the City of Temecula Fire Prevention Division. F. Styles Spanish Eclectic Inspired by the architecture of Spain and Latin America, this style emphasizes rich and stylistic details. The Spanish Style has a low-pitched roof with little or no eave opening. Like other Spanish styles, is has a red tile roof with one or more gables. There are arches placed above the door and windows. The walls are typically made of stucco and asymmetrical entries are common. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 9 Bella Linda Standard Elements Form & Roof: • Generally two-story massing with a prominent one-story element • Generally, though not always, asymmetrical • Often "L" or "U" shaped and focused on a courtyard • Shallow root pitch of 4:12 to 5:12 • Predominantly gable and shed, some hip • Shed roof at entry and/or porch • Barrel "S" tiles Walls & Windows: • Smooth stucco preferred; may have soft trowel pattern • Thick appearance • Corbelling or trip (molding) shapes along roof line • Applied decorative elements such as pilasters, quoins, etc. • Vertical divided light casement, single -hung or double -hung windows • Often windows are arched, sometimes in pairs of threes • Typically deep-set windows Details: • Arcaded porches, sometimes supported by columns • May have limited classical order detail elements • Round tile or stacked barrel tile attic vents in gables • Sculpted walls and chimneys Colors: • Field: white or very light earth tones • Trim: darker earth tones for accent trim or elements (shutters, etc.) • Accents: white or deep jewel tones of red, green or blue for windows and doors Enhancement Opportunities: • Patterned tile decoration or sculptural "stone" relief inserts • Copper gutters and downspouts • May include accent surrounds (stone, stuccoed molding, decorative tile) • Wrought iron or painted metal features (e.g. balconies, window grills, etc.) Style Highlights 1. Thick stucco walls with barrel "S" tiles 2. Decorative tile and iron work 3. Arched windows Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 10 Bella Linda Spanish Eclectic Single -Family Spanish Eclectic Multi -Family Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 11 Bella Linda Spanish Colonial Spanish Colonial is an adaptation of Mission Revival enriched with additional Latin American details and elements. The style attained widespread popularity after its use in the Panama -California Exposition of 1915. The simple courtyards of the Spanish Colonial heritage with hanging pots, a flowering garden and sprawling shade trees are hardly surpasses as foreground design elements. Further architectural distinction is established through the use of tile roofs, stucco walls, heavily textured wooden doors and highlighted ornamental ironwork. Standard Elements Form & Roof: • Square or rectangular plan form massing • Two-story massing with strong one-story elements • 4:12 to 5:12 roof pitch • Simple hip or gable roof • Barrel "S" tiles Walls & Windows: • Light sand -finish or light lace -stucco finish • Vertical hung six and eight paned windows Details: • Stucco -over -foam window and door trim • Arched stucco column porches and fully rounded arches • Clay pipe or half oval attic vents Enhancement Opportunities: • Simple, articulated two-story boxed plan massing with no more than 50% one-story element across the front elevation • Shed roof over porch • Stucco -sand finish • Feature recessed arched windows • Accent beveled glass recessed windows • Wrought iron balconies and accent details • Shaped rafter tails at feature areas • Feature ribbon windows three or more Style Highlights 1. Stucco walls with barrel tile roofs 2. Shallow sloped roofs with variegated colors 3. Thick walls with deep recessed openings 4. Detailing at openings 5. Decorative iron work Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 12 Bella Linda • E44I .0 V4a 411,4•044- i '""�IIUI1111111.� 4-1 �.�N� yt aIIIAi111111lir Spanish Colonial Single -Family Spanish Colonial Multi -Family Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 13 Bella Linda Monterey The Monterey style is a combination of the original Spanish Colonial adobe construction methods with the basic two-story New England colonial building. Prior to this innovation in Monterey, all Spanish Colonial buildings were of single -story construction. First built by Thomas Larkin in 1835, the Monterey style introduced two-story construction and shingle -roofs to California. The Monterey style and its single -story counterpart eventually had a major influence of the development of modern architecture in the 1930's. Standard Elements Form & Roof: • Asymmetrical one and two-story massing • Main hip roof front to back 4:12 to 7:12 • Shed roof over balcony at 3.5:12 to 4.5:12 roof pitch • Barrel or "S" tile roofs, concrete tile or shingle Walls & Windows: • Vertical, multi -paned windows at front elevation • Multi -paned windows or inserts on side and rear elevations in high visibility public views • Surface mounted fixtures on front elevations complement architectural style • Simple 2x window and door trim — wood on siding, foam on stucco, etc. Details: • Surface mounted fixtures on front elevations complement architectural style • Wood balcony and railing • Chimney top trim • Round tile attic vents and shutters on primary windows Colors: • Field: whites or light beige buff pink tints • Trim: off-whites, rust or light to dark brown (balconies) • Accents: deep jewel tones or green, blue and red (shutters) Enhancement Opportunities: • Simple plan with one-story break or gable end forward • Main hip roof front to back with one intersecting front facing gable roof • Siding accents at second floor, balcony and gable ends • Brick accents on lower story wall and veneer at first floor • Vertical window shape with multiple panes, often in groupings • Recessed accent windows • Decorative wrought iron accents Style Highlights 1. Simple volumes with gables running parallel with the street. 2. Shallow -pitched roofs with variable roofing materials. 3. Multi -paned windows. 4. Incorporation of garden walls into architectural facade. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 14 Bella Linda Monterey Single -Family I I Monterey Multi -Family G. Streetscape The site planning, street design, and layout of PDO -13 is encouraged to have strong pedestrian orientation. The residential streetscape shall be designed in a manner that creates a visually appealing street. • Create an exciting intersection at Temecula Lane and the entrance to PDO -13. To accomplish this, consider enhanced landscaping with accent trees, provide for entry walls with enhanced materials such as stone, and decorative paving that complements the architectural style of PDO -13. • Create an environment where people feel comfortable walking and spending time. • Provide pedestrian scaled lighting fixtures. • Provide for outdoor seating areas where appropriate to create gathering places for residents and visitors. • Minimize garage visibility. • Use a variety of architectural styles, varied entry treatments, varied building heights and a variety of design details and building form along the street. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 15 Bella Linda H. Massing and Scale Visual interest in the streetscape is created in part through building articulation and a variety of forms between buildings. • There should be strong vertical accents and varied wall plane lines on front elevations. • Building forms should be appropriate to their architectural style. • There should be publicly visible balconies, veranda, and porches. • Front porches, when intended to provide outdoor space for residents, should be sufficiently sized to be usable for sitting. • There should not be overly repetitive, unarticulated building forms. • Style "applique" on inappropriate building forms should be avoided. • Unarticulated roof forms should not be set on a constant wall plate height. • Boxy and monotonous facades that lack reference to human scale and have large expanses of flat walls should be avoided. • Buildings shall be designed to provide massing configurations with a variety of differing walls and roof planes. • Buildings should incorporate smaller -scale architectural forms such as bays, recessed or projecting balconies, and dormers that are associated with its architectural style, to visually reduce the height and scale of the building and emphasize the definition of individual units. • Varied building heights are encouraged, both to provide visual interest and give the appearance of a collection of smaller structures. I. Materials, Finishes & Details Details and materials should be appropriate to the style that the building is expressing. Appropriate and well thought out detailing should enhance the perception of the community's quality. • Gutters, downspouts, and rainwater leader heads should be integral to the roof or wall detailing and be designed as part of the facade. • Roofing materials should be appropriate to their related style and pitch. • Changes in materials should occur at inside corners where the building plane changes direction. • Homes should have a color palette that, at a minimum, includes a body color, trim color and accent color. • Wall mounted lights for accents and porches shall be complimentary to the architectural style as depicted below, or an approved equal, as determined by the Director of Planning. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 16 Bella Linda Spani:h E:lectic Maxim Lighting "Odessa ES" Model 485014LTES Espresso Spani:li Colonial r',1onterey Maxim Lighting Maxim Lighting "Dover ES" "Balboa ES VIVEX" Model #86094FSBZ Model #85163GFC0 Bronze Copper Oxide • Doors shall be enhanced and complimentary to the architectural style as depicted below, or an approved equal, as determined by the Director of Planning. J U U L i SPANISH MONTEREY COLONIAL THERMA TRU DOORS 'AMERICAN STYLE COLLECTION' MODEL NO. CCAR60 (WITH 4 BLOCK DENTE. SHELF ACCESSORY) THERMA TRU DOORS 'CLASSIC -CRAFT RUSTIC COLLECTION' MODEL NO. CCR8205 SPANISH SPANISH ECLECTIC ECLECTIC THERMA TRU DOORS 'FIBER -CLASSIC OAK COLLECTION' MODE. NO. 2150 RG THERMA TRU DOORS 'CLASSIC -CRAFT RUSTIC COLLECTION MODEL NO. CCRB010 Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 17 Bella Linda J. Varied Roof Planes Varying roof forms/changes in roof plane shall be used to minimize a flat, repetitious plane. Multiple rooflines can be used to create a visually appealing silhouette and will be considered when the building elevations are visible form a public street. • Roof eaves should extend out from the primary wall surface to enhance shadow lines and articulation of wall surfaces. • Varying roof forms/changes in roof plane shall be used to minimize a flat, repetitious plane. • Multiple rooflines can be used to create a visually appealing silhouette and will be considered when the building elevations are visible from a public street. • Flat roofs are prohibited. K. Garage/Carport Location and Design Because of the unique courtyard design of PDO -13, garages for the Courtyard homes will be accessed via a shared driveway off the street. Parking clusters are a good strategy for reducing the frequency of curb cuts, parking aprons and garages on the streetscape. • The dwelling unit driveways serving a cluster of homes shall be a maximum of 20' wide. However, an accent -paved pedestrian walkway from the street to the auto court is required. • Garage doors shall be consistent with the architectural style of the home. • A garage shall not occur directly at the end of a parking court vista as viewed from the street. Rather, it shall be offset to one side such that the front porch and entry/or a green space may occur at the end of the vista as a focal point. Parking may also be allowed in this space. • To discourage obstruction of the driveway, garage aprons shall be no more than 6' feet deep or no less than 18' deep as measured from the property line. The deeper parking aprons should be limited to the rear units not visible from the street. • Individual private driveway aprons should be reduced to be minimum functional width of 16.' • Garage doors shall have a minimum paved back -out dimension of 25'. Paved back -out area may include any continuous combination of apron, neighboring apron, driveway and common court areas. • Planting pockets should be used between garage doors. • The multi -family area shall provide parking in accordance with the City of Temecula standards. Guest parking shall be in a location convenient to the buildings that the spaces are intended to serve. • The design of carports shall be representative of the architectural styles of the Bella Linda project. • Carport roofs visible from buildings or streets shall incorporate roof slopes and materials to match adjacent buildings. • Flat roofs on carports, garages, and ancillary structures are discouraged. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 18 Bella Linda TYPICAL DETACHED 8 -CAR CARPORT SIDE ELEVATION 111\1411 L16.1•1•1141."114- ....116111.44. 1441•M.114461114 .•L.►111.\\11L\11d.111L\ L\111 16111 1111 11..11.11 4416 TYPICAL DETACHED 8 -CAR CARPORT FRONT ELEVATION OLEO TYPICAL DETACHED 11 CAR GARAGE - LEFT SIDE TYPICAL DETACHED 11 CAR GARAGE - RIGHT SIDE IT 00 TYPICAL DETACHED 11 CAR GARAGE - REAR ELEVATION • ......• •• •nunun.wuw.Ywww.uiwuwu.u.u:�i Vic{ ..unun.wwwuw«+.iwu.u.u.u.-•--• - TYPICAL DETACHED 11 CAR GARAGE - FRONT ELEVATION Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 19 oo?. oo DODO MOO 0000 0000 0000 0000 DODO 0000 0000 MOO MOO MOO MOO MOO DDDR MOO 0000 DDDR 0000 IDD00 DDDR DDDR 0000 0000 0000 DDDR 0000 0000 ODDD 0000 DDOD 0000 DODO 0000 0000 0000 DDDR 0000 0000 0000 0000 MOO 0000 0000 TYPICAL DETACHED 11 CAR GARAGE - FRONT ELEVATION Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 19 Bella Linda L. Lighting Exterior lighting can provide safe and effective evening character illumination for the pedestrian and vehicular areas of roads, sidewalks, and walkways through the Bella Linda community. Design should reflect the concept and character of the community through illumination level, light fixture type, finish color and location. Ornamental/decorative streetlights will be required along Project roadways, and at Project locations that are visible from the public view. Less decorative (more functional) freestanding lighting fixtures will be allowed on the Project site, where there is limited public exposure. • The level of on-site lighting shall comply with any and all applicable requirements of the City of Temecula. • All lighting on-site shall meet the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. • All exterior lighting fixtures shall be consistent with the architectural style for the building that is serves. • All exterior light sources in parking lots and on community accessory structures associated with the apartments shall be properly shielded to prevent direct view from interiors of individual units. • Each residence shall have a porch light or similar at each door. • Each home or unit with an alley loaded garage shall be provided with at least one coach light on the elevation facing the alley or side street that serves the garage. Such lights shall be controlled independently by photo sensors and shall be illuminated from dusk to dawn. • Street lights shall be single armed on 14' high poles to reduce glare and the impact of lighting on residences. • Lighting shall be low-voltage/high-efficiency whenever possible. • Street lights shall be focused downward to ensure pedestrian safety and way finding. • Footpath lights are acceptable as a means to illuminate a secondary path. • Inset stairway and stair step lights are encouraged to ensure pedestrian safety and way -finding. • Building mounted lighting fixtures are encouraged to be selected and located to cast downward and be shielded to minimize glare. • Lighting from buildings can be balanced with street lighting to ensure areas are not over lit. • Accent lighting shall emphasize special features such as fountains, sculptures, wall niches, signs, planters or accent trees for decorative effects. • Accent lighting shall be inconspicuous and durable. • Small scale accent lights such as LED based fixtures can serve for way -finding or be used themselves as special design elements. • Flashing, neon, moving, high-intensity or exposed light source type luminaries are not permitted. Lighting fixtures should be selected to complement the architecture and layout of PDO - 13. The quantity and quality of light, as measured in foot-candles, should be consistent with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance. Lighting levels should not be so intense as to draw attention to the glow or glare of the PDO -13 site. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 20 Bella Linda 5:177- 1 WOLL IMUNTED LIGII MP.) M. Trash Enclosures • Trash enclosures should be separated from adjacent parking stalls with a minimum of 5' wide (interior clear dimension) planter and a 12" wide paved surface behind the curb to ensure adequate space is available for individuals to access a vehicle. • Trash/recycling containers should be large enough, placed frequently throughout the site, and collected frequently enough to handle the refuse generated by the project. • Trash enclosures should be designed with similar finishes, materials, and details as the primary buildings and shall be screened with landscaping. • Chain link fencing and gates with wood slats are not allowed. • Enclosures should be unobtrusive and conveniently located for trash disposal by tenants and for collection service vehicles. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 21 Bella Linda • Where feasible, a pedestrian entrance to the trash enclosure should be provided so that large access doors do not have to be opened. • Enclosures should not be visible from primary entry drives. • Enclosures shall have a concrete apron onto which trash/recycling containers will be rolled for collection. TRASH ENCLOSURE LEFT SIDE ELEVATION TRASH ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION O TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION N. Mail Boxes Once construction documents are underway, a mailbox master plan will be created and coordinated with the United States Postal Service, identifying type and location of mailbox structures. • All mailboxes shall be enclosed with some form of decorative trellis. • All mailbox trellises shall be softened through the use of landscaping to include shrubs and vines. O. Address Lettering • Color house or unit address numbers and letters shall be of a contrasting color to the background to which they are attached and must be visible at all times. • All homes with alley loaded garages shall have numbers and letters visible from the alley. A sign or plaque may be utilized for directional purposes. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 22 Bella Linda • All address lettering shall be illuminated from dusk to dawn. • Addressing for all single-family development shall be visible from the street. P. Mechanical Equipment & Vents • On-site mechanical equipment visible from buildings or public streets should be screened. • Roof mounted mechanical equipment is prohibited on all product types. • Wall mounted mechanical equipment that protrudes more than six inches from the outer building wall shall be screened from view by structural features that are compatible with the architecture or the subject buildings. Wall mounted mechanical equipment that protrudes six inches or less from the outer building wall shall be designed to blend with the color and architectural design of the subject building. • Ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view by a decorative architectural structure or landscape screening that is compatible with the architecture and landscaping of the development site. Such screening devices shall be of a height equal to or greater than the height of the mechanical equipment being screened. • Roof flashing vents exposed to public view shall be painted or otherwise given a finish to match adjacent surfaces or concealed in a manner consistent with the building's appearance. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 23 Bella Linda 17.22.254 LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS A. Landscape Elements (reference Figures 1 and la) Landscape of PDO -13 shall conform to Section 17.06.060 (Residential District, Landscape Standards) of the City's Municipal Code. Landscape plans shall be required as a part of the Development Plan for PDO -13 and shall include the following: • The landscape design of PDO -13 consists of a combination of ornamental plants and the use of drought -tolerant plant materials, consistent with the project plant palette. (Reference Figure la) • Streetscape for the proposed street in PDO -13 shall be planted with a minimum 24" box specimen size street tree spaced at 30' on center spacing (maximum) with a combination of 15 -gallon and 5 -gallon shrubs and ground cover. Flowering ground cover will be provided to fill any voids in the streetscape landscape. • The PDO -13 entry shall be designed to create an architectural statement as well as a landscape statement that reflects the architectural character of PDO -13. • Common areas shall be landscaped with appropriate shrubs, trees and ground cover and shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association for PDO -13. • Common front yard landscape shall be developed to provide community landscape theme and landscape character for PDO -13. All common from yards will have automatic irrigations systems maintained by the Homeowners Association. Appropriate ornamental and drought tolerant plant materials shall be used as follows: • One 24" box specimen tree per unit and an additional two trees at street corners. • Five gallon shrubs for building foundation planting and along the fence line. • Five gallon shrubs as needed for accent color and mass planting. • Sodded turf and ground covers as needed. All Common Landscape areas shall be landscaped per the above standards and maintained by the Homeowners Association for PDO -13. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 24 Bella Linda Figure 1 Overall Landscape Plan Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 25 Bella Linda Figure la Plant Palette ABBREVIATION I BOTANICAL NAME I COMMON NAME I SIZE I NUMBER I REMARKS IWATER USE J 3 3.. 3 I SHRUBS: J 3 J. J J 3 J J J. 6 .. zQ J I FES. ARU. I FESTUCA ARUNDIACEA I WATERSAVER 2 FESCUE I SOD I AS REO'D. INSTALL PER SPECIFICATIONS I H I MULCH & GROUNDCOVER: WOOD MULCH I FOREST BLEND WOOD MULCH I MEDIUM GRIND WOOD MULCT' 3" MAX. I AS REO'D. 13" DEEP - CONTACT RON ALLEVATO (949) 551-0363. DOUBLE STAKE /HGHT. 8-10711-12,SPR.3-4'/4-5'MINI DOUBLE STAKE / HEIGHT 6-10' , SPREAD 3'-4' MIN. [PLANT PER DETAIL - 36" BOX SIZE EOUMLANT DOUBLE STAKE / HEIGHT 8-10' , SPREAD 3'-4' MIN. DOUBLE STAKE /HEIGHT 8-10' , SPREAD 3'-4' MIN. DOUBLE STAKE /HGHT. 8-10711-12,SPR.3-4'/4-5'MIN SENIOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ONLY FULL & SPREADING IFULL & BUSHY FULL & BUSHY FULL & BUSHY (50% ORANGE & YELLOW) I TRIANGULAR SPACING 0 5' 0.C. I FULL & UPRIGHT (FULL & BUSHY FULL & BUSHY (FULL & BUSHY FULL & BUSHY (FULL & BUSHY Q f In a H rn co- co e M 0 N l I I I I I I I I I I I I IM A O N 24" 80X m 24" BOX m N- m N 24" BOX I - N N.- ,- N N N N N N N N N W o to �7!; Ir m 6m QUEEN PALM ICHINESE FLAME TREE ILONDON PLANE TREE z �S o oE O ¢ Q o I CHINESE EVERGREEN ELM ymI a I FORTNIGHT IRIS Z+; K qhN o I PROSTRATE MYOPORUM ITALIAN CYPRESS s 0 E IDWARF BOTTLE BRUSH F W E AUTUMN SAGE I SHINY XYLOSMA BOSTON IVY I BLOOD -RED TRUMPET VINE inIZ D Q Wa &7 W qq 3 CINNAMONUM CATAPHORA COCOS PLUMOSA 1 KOELREUIERIA BIPINNATA PIATANUS ACERIFOUA 'BLOCOG000' PYRUS CALLERYANA BRADFORD' 1 ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' I ROSMARINUS OFVICIANAUS 'PROSTRATUS' I DIETES VEGETA LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS I HEMEROCAUJS HYBRIDS MYOPORUM PARVFODUM CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS W iO Sg Z z m WE0 rj 7 LAVANDULA DENTATUM la 0 re IXYLOSMA CONGESTUM PARTHENOCISSUS TRICUSPIDATA 0 z m 0 S o B COC. PLV. m WO Y I PLA. A. '8.G.' . m tia O . D a drs vs Z a .... J m Zx MYO. PAR. 0 PHO. FRA. I CAL. V. 'LJ.' bo lti 0c 0i I PAR. TRI. I DIS. BUC. g EB144j000 0 0 ® e o I, 000 Io0 @® 1— Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 26 Bella Linda B. Streetscenes The following text and figures describes the streetscenes contained in PDO -13. The streetscenes have been designed in a comprehensive manner to provide continuity within PDO -13 as well as compatibility with the existing, surrounding development. 1. Courtyard Housing - Street (reference Figure 2) The courtyard housing street provides direct access to the single-family units. The courtyard housing street has a proposed face of curb to face of curb width of 32'. The typical design standards for neighborhood streets include two travel lanes with space for on -street parallel parking and an adjacent attached or detached sidewalk. Neighborhood Streets are used to accommodate moderate to low traffic volumes. Vertical curbs are used. 2. Internal Courtyard - Drive (reference Figure 3) The internal courtyard drive for the courtyard housing is accessed via the senior courtyard housing street. The internal courtyard drive has a proposed width of 20' between each garage apron and each home has a 4' apron to access the garage, providing a width of 28' from garage door to garage door. Small planter areas 4' deep are used as separation from the courtyard drive to the house and two parking stalls are provided at the end of each courtyard drive. Curbs are not encouraged in the courtyard drive. 3. Apartments (reference Figure 4) a. Facing A travel lane is provided in front of the apartments for parking purposes and vehicular circulation. The travel lane is 24' and has 90 -degree parking on each side of the travel lane. Planter areas are provided as visual relief every 10 spaces. b. Back-to-back Alleys are used to provide automobile access and service areas for apartments with rear -loaded garages. The design standard for this street type provides a 24' wide back -of curb- to back -of -curb dimension that allows two-way travel. A 5' landscape area has been provided between the garage doors to soften the hardscape and structures at the pedestrian level. 4. Pechanga Parkway (reference Figure 5) Pechanga Parkway is classified as a Principal Arterial in the City of Temecula and has a proposed face of curb to face of curb width of 86'. The design standards for Pechanga Parkway include four travel lanes with space for on -street parallel parking and an adjacent attached or detached sidewalk. Adjacent to the Bella Linda project, a 20' wide pedestrian corridor with a meandering path lines the street and creates separation from the road to the residences. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 27 Bella Linda 5. Loma Linda Road (reference Figure 6) Loma Linda Road is classified as a Collector in the City of Temecula and has a proposed face of curb to face of curb width of 44'. The design standards for Loma Linda Road include four travel lanes with space for on -street parallel parking and an adjacent attached or detached sidewalk. Adjacent to the Bella Linda project, a 12' wide pedestrian corridor with a meandering path lines the street and creates separation from the road to the residences. Pedestrian connections are provided to the individual units. Vertical curbs are used. Vertical curbs are used. 6. Temecula Lane (reference Figure 7) Temecula Lane provides direct access to each development area within the Bella Linda project, and has a proposed face of curb to face of curb width of 40'. Temecula lane includes two travel lanes with space for on -street parallel parking and an adjacent attached or detached 5' sidewalk. Vertical curbs are used. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 28 Bella Linda Figure 2 Courtyard Street Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 29 Bella Linda Figure 3 Internal Courtyard URGE BACKGROUND SHRUB r•n•N•N•••n•n••••••••••n••• n- ••nn•N••••• OC•ac'>• 0O x'. 0 0 111,3P13'0%.10 .11.13 9 m i to z LOW GROUNDCOVER SHRUB Oo— `x;00 clf= ;gym. oc,kr• Aver000 00 s 2 9 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 ©c�o-s©oma � •0 $©�C1.0So ei 0m iq { OW 0 �C;g 0 0 0o 00 0 0 0 00`r ' A � 0 �� ,W� c0452010 0 O�s,o° 0 8 r) 0 0 00 0 0 0 ••••••••••••• • N ••••••••••• N • N111110111111•1111011 N• N • ••••••• 1 'r .Opa Q0 oremrX07 •0 FLOWERING ACCENT SHRUB o• 0 1 z 9 0 7co m m Inaul-PA 446 io L•00) FLOWERING ACCENT TREE DECIDUOUS BACKGROUND Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 30 Bella Linda Figure 4 Apartments Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 31 Bella Linda Figure 5 Pechanga Parkway RAWERING ACCENT TREE FLOWERING VINE ATTACHED TO THE WALL LARGE SCREEN SHRUB Figure 6 Loma Linda Road LOW FLOWERING SHRUB ,,4'1,):,a, ll/t..-S1 0,-�A A. *-241114. !,,x11)::1141;totio40.4--; c,c,;c,;„;,3 0dia ,e Q4"r�oNt0°eAA 03k9O(4QhtWV ., tObI . Y a°l ©x 7*. Ciel�etZa e0BF5 ', E�0Q%F�eE'n636:6.Oee?ora _,�croee��� �t�ee e���1ac�;(��ot�6MEANDERING SIDEWAL_ :4 j9C+ppp1I\« • '4.144 LOW GROUNDCOVER SHRUB -- STREET TREE �—u LOMA LINDA ROAD MEDIUM SCREEN SHRUBS MOUND AC. UNITS FLOWERING GROUNDCOVER Figure 7 Temecula Lane MEDUM SCREEN SHRUBS MOUND A.C. UNITS FLOWERING GROUNDCOVER LOW GROUNDCOVER SHRUB FARCE BACKGROUND SHRUB H�.I0°r'":16' STREET TREE 0y 7„OR� k,I e o1ILOW FLOWERING SIiUB gniI QFM[�/ 000000 I 0 1a **I�T11' _A.op 0 4E.i-WSir }4p<c10��.' CVj om' 117 u�81,410K-,',,-104 i-0..0. CPjyl01g- ea.Am�u] ��,.a+'174'2''..44:' '17Mot�� P�w"o/1fi1�/ o.tliY_3�0 Mw111V0o0 ©io�x.. JO°�,�4d0e 1e-39Ee3A Oc!r mfir�vl06oac6oEn9 09recEOkefl�ea 9E.4O?i�a6r �/ aAi € tDigiaaaaeesa0EVIDef aaaE 3®®6aaaaaaaaaBiaa0. 0•120'w ' CONCRETE SICEWALK TEMECULA LANE Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 32 Bella Linda C. Hardscape (reference Figure 8) Entrances and focal points within the Bella Linda community shall have pavers or Stamped and stained concrete to match the architectural style of the overall community. D. Entry Monumentation (reference Figures 9 and 10) Entry monuments are the gateway features that create a community. Functionally is signs 'Bella Linda" and demarcates it as a place. Aesthetically, their design can reflect and express the character and high quality of the community. It can tie to the landscape and use a rich palette of plantings and local indigenous material. These entry monuments must have a formal relationship with the entry in order to create a connection from the community to the public. The entry monuments are encouraged to contain accent lighting to make signage visible at night. Entry features can serve as more dramatic and formalized spaces that define the community. Entry features can provide a richer variety of spaces defined by artful treatments of entry arbors, gentle land sculpting and planting. As a focal point for the community, the design of the entry feature off Temecula Lane is encouraged to be the most dramatic and interesting. It provides a great opportunity to incorporate through design, the ties to architectural style of PDO -13. The PDO -13 entry and site amenities will complement one another and reflect the overall architectural theme of PDO -13. The use of pilasters, special paving treatments, and landscaping will be used to create an easily identifiable entry way. • Project entries should be easily identifiable and aesthetically pleasing and be designed to complement the style of the project. • A combination of ornamental landscaping, architectural monuments, decorative signs and/or enhanced paving shall be incorporated into the project entry as accent features. • Project entry features shall reflect the overall architectural identity and character of the project. E. Walls, Fences and Gates (reference Figures 11, 12 and 13) Walls provide edges, grade retention, spatial definition and privacy, but will also enhance the design character of PDO -13. Their design is encouraged to reflect the community environment through recalling historic wall design with materials, stone or masonry unit size and joinery. Materials, texture and color should be used to make walls visually interesting and compatible with the architectural and landscape architecture design. • Fences and walls should be minimized along public and private street right-of- way. • Walls should be stepped to follow the terrain. • Landscaping should be used to soften walls. • Landscape materials will complement the architectural theme. • Stone veneer, masonry, block and wrought iron combinations are acceptable. • Wood fence material should be of the quality to stain so as to prevent rotting and weathering. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 33 Bella Linda • Vinyl fencing is allowed along interior conditions. • Walls may be covered with stucco in colors suitable to the architectural theme. • Stone surfaces may remain natural and unpainted. • Materials, colors and textures shall be varied to create interest and relieve visual monotony. • Barbed wire, wire, electrically charged fences, corrugated metal, chain link, and grape -stake fencing is prohibited. • For the apartment site, directory signs containing site plans of the development with building addresses or numbers shall be provided at locations along the main entrance. • Security gates shall be provided to the entrance of the courtyard homes and after the main entrance to the apartment site. Adequate vehicular turn around space shall be provided in front of each gate for vehicles that do not wish to enter the developments. • Security gates shall be electronically mechanized with remote access and keypad access. • Security gates shall be constructed with durable and weather resistant materials. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 34 Bella Linda Figure 8 Walkways/Roadways Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 35 Bella Linda Figure 9 Entry Monumentation Plans LARGE BACKGROUND SHRUB LOW FLOWERING %RUB r v TREE PECHANGA PARKWAY 5 HIGH SCREEN WALL TW. BGTH 006 EVERGREEN BACI(GROUND TREE 108 ROWERING SHRUB MOMMENT SIGN MEANDERING CONCRETE WAIN LOW GROUNDCOVER SHRUB AR ENT ENR55 40544 Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 36 Bella Linda Figure 10 Entry Monumentation Elevations 18' S0. PILASTER W/ LEDCESTONE VENEER TYPE PER OWNER STUCCO (COLOR TO MATCH BUILDINGS) 9' TALL METAL LETTERS SME AND COLOR BY OWNER 10' TALL METAL CHANNEL LETTERS. STYLE SELECTED BY OWNER STUCCO FINISH TP. (SLIECIB] BY OTHER) PRECAST CONCRETE CAP LEDGESTONE VENEER (SELECTED BY OWNER) NOTE: MONUMENT SHALL BE LLUMINATED BY (3) 13W DIRECT BURIAL PRECAST CONCRETE FLOODLIGHTS. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 37 Bella Linda Figure 11 Wall and Fence Plan Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 38 'NOTE GATE AT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 10 BE SELF CLOSING W/ AUTOMATIC LOCKS (KEA 0R CMO). LOCKS PER OWNER REQUIREMENTS. Bella Linda 5/B' S0. T.S. BARS -4' 0.0. 7YP. Figure 12 Security Gate Details 1'x1-1/2' T.S. RAILS TOP. BTA. & SIDES 1YP. 111 Apartment Entry Gates PRECAST CONCRETE VP L•AOIEL 44 Moat ENVY WIZ 35'TDRL DKTNCE IIIIIIIIIIHIIIII 11111111111111111 w 01 111 24' S0. STEEL 3-0100'8ID. INil SPEED BALL BEARING %TED. 35'-0'3 CAIS RAIL TIP -/ 24'-0'3 • 3/16' x 6' CONT. SAL PULE CENTERED ON STL 1UBES 8E10 ALL M0UND TIP. Apartment Entry Main Gate 24' S0. ✓ 3' POST w/ CO AT GATS TYP. l-3/8' DK. Ileum STEEL CATE MME ELECT. SOLENOID ACTUATED SDIIKE 34EDKTx4—'/2BVW D PRIDED w/ EEPOKY PCI! RMBH 7110 All NOT. SEE DET. 1, 511T. LC -3 FOR FTC. DET. & 011EA NOTES 1' x 2' K 3/4" 00UNIH0 BRACKEIS TYP. Courtyard Entry Main and Man Gates 4' GATE 2 HEAVY DIM BALL DIMING BARREL HINGES NOTE PROVIDE I' ELECT. CONDOR FOR ELECT. `STRIKE IVP. Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 39 Bella Linda Figure 13 Pechanga and Loma Linda Wall Elevation EVERGREEN TREE TYP. GRGUNDCCVER SHRUB TYP. LARGE SHRUB IVP. VINE ATTACHED TO WALL TYP. MEANDERING SIDEWALK STREET SIDE G' II WALL BOWEN PARKING AND SrREEE TYP. MEDIUM FLOWERING SHRUB TYP. DARK Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 40 Bella Linda F. Private Recreation Area (reference Figures 14 and 15) The Recreational Center shall be an active use facility to provide a family oriented center including the development of a child tot lot with a special play equipment structure. The center shall include a recreational pool with generous pool activity areas for social functions. A minimum 20% of the recreation area shall be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. G. Arbors Arbors provide shaded resting spaces for walkers, define spaces, mark entries with gateways and create opportunities for a beautiful mix of plants. Their design can both tie to the region's past and reflect the newness of the community. H. Parks/Open Space (reference Figures 16 and 17) Quality materials will create exceptional public spaces with unique and timeless character. Products and materials in the public realm should be extremely durable and easy to maintain. They should be resistant to regional weather extremes and should also be resistant to vandalism with non -breakable parts, and be scratch resistant with washable surfaces. Examples of durable materials and finishes include: • Stainless Steel • Galvanized Steel • Powder -coated steel or aluminum • Vinyl -coated steel or aluminum • Painted steel with multiple coats • Masonry Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 41 Bella Linda Figure 14 Private Recreation Area Plan Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 42 Bella Linda Figure 15 Private Recreation Area Elevations CLL.BNOUSE - LEFT EUEVAIION " v4 CLLBNOUSE - RIGHT BJVAIION CLUWIOUSE • ME ELEVATION CLU81-1Q.5k • FRUNI Elt'/AIIQN EXERCISE BUILDING • LEFT SIOE ELEVATION EXERCISE BUILDING - RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION EXERCISE BUILDING - REAR ELEVATION EXERCISE BUILDING - FRONT ELEVATION Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 43 Bella Linda Figure 16 Parks/Open Space Overall Plan Figure 17 Parks/Open Space Bioswale Plan LARGE BACKGROUND SHRUB 5' MEANDERING SIDEWALK BIO-SWALE W/3-6" DIA. COBBLE STONE AREA TYPICAL LOW GROUNDCOVER SHRUB EVERGREEN BACKGROUND TREE _ rsI►a,'bcoo 0�4eeoo, •�6�o0oo!��a! 9acto ln400cloirooCi.{t�3Gie �` ' �•,; 'ter c e �►1 EI6. ®0 1OtireA090.0E'cE3 CiPa30�1atir09-00.011 ``A M0:.ACtooa;�04006 oe�90»�;0,,9pc0.0`0`OVICOLO E� Kto ;tot •'�ziC�xll ziltreMalikVow•aws9�r r v,...+ � ,4sR " .,,,� .,„v z r x bsS �. tildITMVII 00 Col i MQ,O. `"`''`g'oo = 8 660�6A�6619000000 0?0 'w• a% 0�900r�969990�600�4 tee 0000 '�, C,.. p es 0�e9.0000o 0 0e6j��'rg Ca ' V' F „Az P 0 0�0 HAS S 00 6 I o-, 0 Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13) 44 0 D D OD 0z 02z O DNIDO 0In C) �n C NNRN0nN CQOI i zm� m-1 a 1 m O m A En 000 (O2 0 msm < o . - (000 0 98W ar m 2• w pN Z Z Dov .- r a c 0 Q N .--lc z acD zm z0z < 4 2• -u A NN Zl O D 0 0 w w < N 1 1 >01r. o w 1;T1 0 0 63- 6 6 112z Z0IpQ c r -I N a01 r W N O zz_�7z zz_�7z R322 1.-20-1-r0 <-1-13mslc�mmR�y1 mZ<�rmrrl1 >0m�1m Z DSA C�D 13 XY) -Iran -Iran 00 %-+7.1M-1 •400 �4O�jv w0-9 OO1.. 00(/j.-. g§ wm_ > CA Ch a Soo rn•n.-- rntn.-- r Z.. Z.. Lm p o7 -♦.-0 -♦.-0 r.11 'llf 7 pm6A ow '1- - T1 cm � -c-o988 0 -<r'1P.1 -< r2 aaat6 0 0D c gcmcm aN. -1�Or Al (r g2rn jw Qm C<D 8 -1 vZ pr • D1 62 zo -r l-m1 0 •ZZ 8 v 8Ag Dov m 0 co 0 C)r my O A O a0 Ca mw1�� Ca Imn G) gwr .- Tr to H wI7W (In0q ;is ”1 m-< N Z 2 a 0.1 n m0 w D ^-o a M .xi M, -.a 5352 g.r-2 gr2) fro W.�-C w1 O .- N NN 6M D .- 1 a Z z 0 0 0 r 0 N :S310N IN3WJSV3 of EEI CO oa Ab 06 o6 c6 - nDzDmDm>0DD D o <N Ow X/ VI Ow w1r1in 1w OD ZZ mEZ nZ CD Fa Z mm -10 mc 038 .-+38 .- .- a v .- r 1. - am rm • oIn D A oo -zm om r D (0'1 26 fZ*lm mm rn e •3 M73 1000 �mz3 m3 3ma <P r j�j-1 O 0 00 mZ 130 00 A m mz 1-1 • A A 2 nOZ 80 ON '- g� 0 1 1rti=11 H m rvwi Eli �0 g v zAz z c �� 2 2 ry c mom .a- O D 9 �8 c`Oi1-1 m z K'i � Q Vl Ds ws. N o rH N o I1 D - N . T) - 1 .1 , • 4%440 -1 N • Z gr,� i, v •• ce.. N NiN r 1 + _I / T/-1 I, ., ` 1 ) '-' w / / / 71 0 11 71 D s2J1SWnN logy 01 m X N 0 coc co I- 0 c 71 rr•-r- P 1 0 0 0 71 01 0 /, C n [1 -a' 1- /_ -T.47:91.:11 1�1,-1 1- 1 / : / / 5 / r / N $'sa0r X rsaol X CD0 O / '6601 X 2 8 ' VOOL 'ON n 0 z d z' 61 ;gym m O X r-1 ➢mz m0 CD F9 KU) O O <71 O p> O ➢ '4 0) w 0 na) . 1 MM m X n Oc 0) D • D r 0 0 Z W m 0 3 oNHJ3oNVEW 0 0 0 c < 0 rn Z rn 0 07 w (0 c o rs NCD O SNOIIIONOO ONIISIX3 9NINNVid PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0277 VON I l V1138 z 0 c r O r r m 0 00 00 cn rm M 4 + F Ij - ; •-) �. / 1 1 / -, •A -1 t_/ 't ` <� + -1 / / %' + • '- C, j I 1‘4e .• 1 1 • -1 $ A:1 1 [ r ' - t 1 1 I L8101 X c. 0 0 m z m Q% n-_01 r `H O z 0r o C 0 (no n� r m N E; o T- o z Z L OZ 1 IHdd 0 co (5 O 0 0 8'8101 X z O O Ul ij 1 F zl 01 En 0 X 0 r- ➢ rn z CD A10 oma O C 71 0 ➢ 71 O 4 PenEG GO K Of'10 �z-0 ➢ 0 O F- fn cn 7171 0� > 5 -& J CO N •A O. • J 0) Ula w N G1 I trizi>< ;I;13 3 =m��C�> 2 -14`1_C -J �J moo�� mnoy m{N > AC bII�,, -"-.rm� ..'io oCO COZ2�'1`J > QD D"Q N`- 0r re„ cn z.- gner a 111 1� '-0ZI�_v0; n.I v2. •1b CO D-1 +] (00) `rV o' m�I�J ai 219'1 N�oN 4s 0 CO OJ� N En c b Exio>D • 1 Z 1�, t m D O rtl U� x C, X J �� X NIy (O k' 3003 �. OO � _ ' (p O Q (y N �fl a 1LA b 1 . ) CA CO I.1CA 1(0 m T w �`� O N :1 '��I O $ CO Owi I. \ w CD m � O b O K 1 A o A mDODTID MMOM A rim -1m o(7 o m 1 m D m mx111 rm •-w ommmmo m com .... �Z2 a0 ow •- - O D Z N AOAA1(Dn0 MMM A m W m A w l 2M w- O O D •-- o O m E A 0 Z -Z(7 1t1 > o 4-4 o w r o o w c m r O M D Z a 0 M DA A < 10200 0 mrJmz- 0000M00 0010•-a AO Cr(n 021Zma) A000A ZZ .Z00 - 1 2 0 0 0 2 o• 0T.m CNma0 NaAJ� m J 2 DO OWDmm 'lMO M DO0Nrt1 N z0 c D c .0-10> zr Z z 1 J '4 mm 9 D r 1 in 1 D A 2 C 2 w A OCD. -w0 C7 w my D 0-0 w 0 w0mom .0 m - A O O A D w z m w GUIDE — 2006 EDITION RIVERSIDE COUNTY PAGE 979—C4 En o1m47D Cl Dmr ar 0<119 Cl19 cn r - N O � • mo •- A m 1 1 m MMMM A C m >rmor •-cr< n o -i r r oww)w-< v N C C 73 3 Z 1< w w 0 110 w.-.-190073 x0)19 TI3:73CCO rn DD rn •- 1 1 c I m m N 2 x z maCCE0mm0 z cn D 2E DO A 1 o r w A z z .- I O C7 z A o_ 1 x 19 0 0 m N N O A r r o a r i i ?rn 0 X)A .-r c7) -- C0 N < A D D NOi mn 10> O O O w w z -r z co cn co _- vN 00> 1900 2W m 3 a 3 0 0< 0 0 v A m m m A A X X X 00• -•-•- --www 00111 ZZ 0000 0 DD\ uD 1 z A o z mammcca wmomw mmoom < v0 O m 0WNZ< M4 -40 z z A ZZ MO D D •-rzrz rm47A1 -9 r PMoz omr <r v I- z 2 0 oom 'l OsIwil CO .- EOOEwro- D- D- 1 Z O M m rr A D A D D 0 r w z m O 1 o• -mm w mw 2r• -TI CI 3E 0 m-0 1 c 1 r w o v ..00 ° 3Z 0 m 2E -.- -0fz E A E Z 1 o>--- vrv»r N s ACCESS RIGHTS TO BE RELINQUISHED ON FINAL MAP. CID CO •,4 a) Ula LA 2 2 r r rr w m D D o z 1 Ammr901n11mzmrzom 'C"'DA.m-Nlt7_- C o -CoA A AOZW 3m3A, m ODioni:'-Iww> r r z.-OpD A r -I 3 1 D D- j" o m D o Z1NAODm0w W Z73mm 2 D D" m m m A m m 2 r N C mwmr3.A ' A ^0110(3 nDDCA"D"CIr-I<O 0 Z-A� N4 1-1 .- Zm3r 1D N -4 OD< j Arr1A �.- m w �0�10t'I O 1O nIZ<4� � 1 fl -1 0 1z<ooa-Im 0(0z NN 3 0 r O •w- z 1 11 II 35 O N C/ 0 3 Z; 1 O A W D 1 z D m o oo O A m ..4 w'-W1t'I O C X '1 (D'] _Irmo z m m m 0{2(,13- mm. 1 fM r71 wt110 11 w m A <2 0 m N2 O 0 D cn -1A -1 38 11IM L90LZ 'ON N N86.37'09"W r o n v v l o s 1 m A 2 m m x o X x <DDmmmr sm m• -Z•-•- 3 P Z o Z Z O C O N w Drlmm•-zZ c 0 00-18-A m 7l mil 11C C 0 D O N N 0{ WO 3 X 0 T10- 1 P10 sCO > -D DD1zO- N w E A w m m m A •-mnMrUo >r -i> m >u Z mrw-'1 o ZA m Z w r c C 1 A C w D o O r r r > <70DCOm1 r -IM 0- M 2 A o A l 2 030340.190 o N r 000 D maamcrn'lo 0 o» 1 O x w P10) P1 Z11 CnC.- 0-0z1-$ 000 mcicoo Z r>230Z7w'130 OmwrwAOOn 0 0000-0000 sMmxm< 0 •- 30-1M0 D rrZna- '-'w r!1mOAw Z mmm.owr w .'o>C< > TIZ m 1A•- zlrm• m>Z 0100 0 Z o >0 s N 0 uzpDzcm - m- Zmo0O1 > >o cox wmx swC •- O m N D 1 Z Z -002om 0 A 1 w Z s N D N 000-1 CO co AZ 0 X 'm-' N 3 Cmn rrn aq s4Z7OA CDSDn CO- CO m D D Z Z r o mcr2 mO0m A P1 •-NCW w- 00 >N30-00 000M M.4-42 ozmin -< O D A o A WO z30w Z -< D DNC A -ODm -I <0z Nm -C O 00 - 2' r MNam OOM OOM CD') a -i IM OaM ODD W 000 1.73' -in 3A I 8G a13 I J831NV3 1/0 'CA D 2 2 2 D 111 1 CD r m A 0 1 1 m .- O * E ,l 0CZ0m co 0047 Zmm A C x o D Z D zz�zrw i D-<Cn1471Z A CD1199CD1CCI) CAmm 0•' mo 19 0-1 •-OAD1z0 0 v Clm0wA m o m s zAArc1x oo• O m o< 2 w 01 ATI.-< C m. <wZ- z< - mC0z v m a) AAo> -< Nmxww 00-< w . A sm0-s- O m o • o z N 2 W D C O --• Z 1 A Cl A m - P1 -s - O O w(01 Z .- '1 01 01 O 1 mO 1 cnm o NAm w D H N SSNI8V38 3O O m Zo rm >0 DA D P11 ra w Co r Hom 0 70 00 O P1 A Or CT 3 • D v v FA0 CO AHdVdOOd01 3O J3dflOS LZL'L66 = NOILVA313 A 1w*1 z \ A MOMEP EMADw > w 1 w j CO P > 1 1 0 mo m m ZJ mzm� 0 o 0 MOCAM Jm OM cn cn - D3 • - - *o `"19''2 0 O m m><O .r- A m Z O -11 0>. 1 19 w o m MMM nom. m *1 0o cn - I rn E o N- 1m --11 z (Join 2 D * D -C M8VMHON38 AJ.Nf10O AHVWHON38 I - u z O 9 11 III cn 0 0 cn 0 0 0 01 0 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ` 3O I Se13A I N 30 AMMO V I NW.I 3VO 3O 31V.S (n 0 c M. 6 m D r M A O m O N m O SIN3W3A0NdINI -12 MX-. SNOIIIONOD ONIISIX3 N re) cn 0 CANNNNNNN O CO 00 J O U1 a w NNN-+-+•A•A N3 -A O CO CO J cn A cn A--'—• a (A N -AO •A (O 00 J a)UIa w N� LOT NO. as NN 0 0 4200 aJarna aaaaaaAS J14. a a Ja A. a NNNNNO)N 0000-0)0 o a 0 a 0 a 0 a a CP N a o s w0000 noa) C3 cn -a CP cn 5764 SQUARE FEET N O 1281 1481 CO 1200 NNNN O O O O 1200 1200 1200 NN 0 O 1200 1200 C7 C70D LA N-+ O(a00a0 J aa) N? W N-+ O CCOO CO CA J aw) N? W N-+ LOT NO. 52537 28344 37375 Can a a) CO 6035 (TCSD) 13365 (O.S.) 1166 (O.S.) 583117 0 COCA `au, N CO J a CO J a a N N a a N 0 o a N 0 0 a N 0 0 a N 0 0 a N 0 0 a N 0 0 a N 0 0 a N 0 0 a N 0 0 a N 0 0 a N 0 0 a NN 0 0 a 0 0 a NN 0 0 a 0 0 SQUARE FEET 318V1 V3dV 101 H:\PDATA\15102409\CADD\MAPPING\TTM\2409-TTM-001.DWG TVERLOOP 6/18/12 3:32 pm PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0277, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 57 LOTS FROM THREE EXISTING PARCELS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD" (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Track Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. D. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 17, 2013 and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA12-0275, a Development Plan, with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring Program and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Tentative Tract Map Application PA11-4277 is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; As designed and conditioned, the proposed map is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Temecula General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use; The proposed map does not impact land designated for conservation or agricultural use. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map; The proposed map subdivides 22.73 acres to allow for 325 apartments and 49 lots for age restricted single-family homes. The proposed Tentative Tract Map design is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and the development standards for the Planned Development Overlay 13 zoning designation. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; The project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on vacant property. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the project. As conditioned, the subdivision is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Fire, Public Works, Planning, and Building and Safety Departments. As a result, the project is consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with Fire and Building Codes and the City's General Plan and Municipal Code which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. A Statement of Overriding Consideration has been provided in order to account for temporary construction noises. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities to the extent feasible. All development must meet all appropriate Building and Fire Code requires as they relate to passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided; Alt acquired rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act); The project involves the construction of multi -family and single-family residential units. The project has been conditioned to ensure the City's parkland dedication requirements are met. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Tentative Tract Map Application, PA11-0277: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map Application, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and an EIR was prepared. B. On April 12, 2012, a Notice of Preparation was released to all agencies and persons that might be affected by the project. C. On April 30, 2012, a scoping session was held at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the EIR for the Project. D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), City staff prepared an EIR analyzing the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map and associated applications ("the Project"), as described in the EIR. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared. E. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. F. Seven written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. The Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR and corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations and all comments received regarding these documents prior to and at the March 20, 2013 public hearing and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with regard to temporary construction noise; and (3) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 13 - recommending that the City Council certify the new Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map to create 57 lots from three existing parcels totaling 22.73 acres, generally located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of April, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0277, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 57 LOTS FROM THREE EXISTING PARCELS TOTALING 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On April 17, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay, PA11-0276 a Tentative Tract Map, and PA11-0275, a Development Plan. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available to public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. E. On March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on March 20, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. F. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. G. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared for the Project. H. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277; a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan. I. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to and at the public hearing. J. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 13 - adopting the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. K. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Development Plan application hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; As designed and conditioned, the proposed map is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Temecula General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use; The proposed map does not impact land designated for conservation or agricultural use. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map; The proposed map subdivides 22.73 acres to allow for 325 apartments and 49 lots for age restricted single-family homes. The proposed Tentative Tract Map design is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and the development standards for the Planned Development Overlay 13 zoning designation. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; The project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on vacant property. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the project. As conditioned, the subdivision is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Fire, Public Works, Planning, and Building and Safety Departments. As a result, the project is consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with Fire and Building Codes and the City's General Plan and Municipal Code which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. A Statement of Overriding Consideration has been provided in order to account for temporary construction noises. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities to the extent feasible. All development must meet all appropriate Building and Fire Code requires as they relate to passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided; All acquired rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act); The project involves the construction of multi -family and single-family residential units. The project has been conditioned to ensure the City's parkland dedication requirements are met. Section 3. Conditions. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map to create 57 lots from three existing parcels totaling 22.73 acres generally located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and it shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , 2013. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2013, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA11-0277 Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map to create 57 lots from three existing parcels totaling 22.73 acres. Assessor's Parcel No.: 961-450-012, 961-450-013, and 961-450-003 MSHCP Category: Residential (Greater than 14.1 DU) DIF Category: Residential (325 Units Attached, 49 Units Detached) TUMF Category: Residential (325 Units Multi -Family, 49 Units Single Family) Quimby Category: Multi -Family Attached (5 or More Units), Single -Family (Attached Garage) Approval Date: 2013 Expiration Date: 2016 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount in the amount of Three Thousand Forty -Five Dollars and Twenty -Five Cents ($3,045.25) which includes the Two Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety -Five Dollars and Twenty -Five Cents ($2,995.25) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15904. If within said 48-hour period the applicantideveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed, for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 5 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Bella Linda Residential Project Environmental Impact Report. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. An Extension of Time may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date. PL -9. If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map PL -10. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. PL -11. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. Environmental Impact Report (EI R) (Bella Linda Residential Project) was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. c. This project is within a Liquefaction Hazard Zone. PL -12. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. PL -13. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Planning Director, City Engineer and the City Attorney and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. PL -14. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. PL -15. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. PL -16. The CC&Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the Project's Water Quality Management Plan. PL -17. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. PL -18. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. PL -19. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. PL -20. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. PL -21. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC&R shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of building permits. PL -22. Maintenance agreements for the multi -family and single-family units must be provided that ensure access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives, parking areas, drainage facilities, and water quality features, shall be provided by the CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. PL -23. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as follows: Article CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA 1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number requires the City to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. 2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural matters. 3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State, or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC&Rs, the provisions of the Conditions of Approval and Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, and regulations shall prevail, notwithstanding the language of the CC&Rs. 4. These CC&Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Planning Director of the City of Temecula. PL -24. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the Declarant's signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City's review of these CC&Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs. Patrick Richardson Planning Director Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney PL -25. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall riot apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. PL -26. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. PL -27. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning Department. PL -28. Per Municipal Code Chapter 17.30, "Smoking in Multi -Unit Residences," the Developer shall submit a site plan to the City for review and approval, designating a minimum of 25 percent of the units within the project as non-smoking units. PL -29 The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in -lieu fees equivalent to 2.79 acres of parkland, based upon the City's then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a 40% credit for private recreational opportunities provided. PUBLIC WORKS General Requirements PW -1. The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost to any Government Agency. PW -2. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the Tentative Map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -3. A Grading Permit for rough grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City -maintained street right-of-way. PW -4. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. PW -5. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW -6. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls into the design of the project to prevent non -permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm water conveyance system or receiving water during all field activities. PW -7. An updated version of the conceptually -accepted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be submitted to the Department of Public Works as part of the initial grading plan submittal package. PW -8. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be consistent with the accepted WQMP. PW -9. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. PW -10. The vehicular movement for the proposed southerly driveway on Loma Linda Road is restricted to right in/right out only. Prior to approval of the Tract Map, unless other timing is indicated, the developer shall complete or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted. PW -11. PW -12. PW -13. The Developer shall process the required documents to affect the proposed sale of Lot 87 of Tract Map No. 21067 (APN 961-450-003) from the City to the Developer, including costs of the appraisal and staff/legal review. The Developer shall provide a drainage easement at the southwest corner of the property to accommodate four 10' x 7' reinforced concrete box storm drain facility as shown on the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Project No. PW99-11 As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Army Corps of Engineers c. California Department of Fish and Wildlife d. Rancho California Water District e. Eastern Municipal Water District f. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District g. Verizon h. Southern California Edision Company i. Southern California Gas Company, or other affected agencies PW -14. The developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following public improvements outlined in these conditions to the City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. a. Pechanga Parkway from Loma Linda Road to the western property boundary (Urban Arterial (6 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 100A-134' R/W) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, installation of sidewalk, parkway improvements and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), b. Loma Linda Road (Secondary Arterial (4 lanes undivided) Highway Standard No. 102-88' RAN) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). c. Temecula Lane (General Local Street Standard No. 104-60' RAN) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). PW -15. PW -16. PW -17. The Developer shall design the following private streets to meet City public road standard. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Street "A" (Private Street - 55' R/E) to include installation of full -width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Development Plan Unless otherwise approved, all criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans. a. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Number 207A b. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets and shall be designed in accordance with City Standards Number 800. c. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right- of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and the utility provider. PW -18. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Pechanga Parkway on the Tract Map as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. PW -19. PW -20. PW -21. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Loma Linda Road from Pechanga Parkway to Temecula Lane on the Tract Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Temecula Lane from Loma Linda Road to Canterfield Drive on the Tract Map with the exception of three openings as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. PW -22. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. PW -23. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. PW -24. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW -25. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the Tract Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the offsite property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. PW -26. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW -27. Prior to any grading permit, the Developer shall record a Grant of Easement which converts the existing drainage easement located along Lots 35 to 52 of Tract Map No. 21067 to an easement for drainage and trail purposes consistent with the Development Plan for Bella Linda. In the event the Developer is not able to record the easement for each affected property, the Developer shall submit a new Development Plan. PW -28. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must receive final acceptance by the City prior to issuance of any grading permit. PW -29. PW -30. PW -31. PW -32. The project shall submit a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement that must include the owner's notarized signature, proof of recordation with the County Recorder's Office, and all maintenance procedures for each of the structural treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the WQMP As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. California Department of Fish and Wildlife b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The Grading Plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. PW -33. The Geologic Study shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the County Geologist. PW -34. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off site or on-site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of 100 years. PW -35. The Developer shall obtain and submit a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). PW -36. Construction -phase pollution prevention shall be consistent with the Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 18.15 and associated technical manual and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control PW -37. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the project's Risk Level (RL) determination number, and name, contact information, and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). A Stormwater Pollution PW -38. PW -39. PW -40. PW -41. Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. The developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW -42. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Tract Map No. 36415 shall be approved and recorded. PW -43. The Developer shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). PW -44. PW -45. PW -46. PW -47. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation, and the soils engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the Grading Permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The Final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough Grading Plan. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (DIF) as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW -48. PW -49. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Developer shall pay its fair share contribution for offsite improvements as identified in the Project's Traffic Impact Analysis dated November 2012 (Section H of the EIR). The project shall demonstrate that all of the structural water quality facilities outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. PW -50. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -51. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0275, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-PHASE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE. PHASE ONE WILL CONSIST OF A 325 APARTMENT UNIT COMPLEX AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES. PHASE TWO OF THE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF 49 AGE RESTRICTED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD" (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450- 003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. D. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 17, 2013 and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA12-0275, a Development Plan, with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan Application PA11-0275 is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application, PA11-0275: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Development Plan Application, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and an EIR was required. B. On April 12, 2012, a Notice of Preparation was released to all agencies and persons that might be affected by the project. C. On April 30, 2012, a scoping session was held at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), City staff prepared an EIR analyzing the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Development Plan and associated applications ("the Project"), as described in the EIR. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared. E. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available to public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. F. Seven written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and Incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. The Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR and corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations and all comments received regarding these documents prior to and at the March 20, 2013 public hearing and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with regard to temporary construction noise; and (3) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 13 - recommending that the City Council certify the new Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of overriding consideration for the Project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA11-0275, a Development Plan to construct a two-phase residential project on a 22.73 acre site. Phase one will consist of a 325 apartment unit complex and associated amenities. Phase two of the project will consist of 49 age restricted single-family units, generally located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of April, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0275, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-PHASE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE. PHASE ONE WILL CONSIST OF A 325 APARTMENT UNIT COMPLEX AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES. PHASE TWO OF THE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF 49 AGE RESTRICTED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APN 961-460-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276 a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On April 17, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0276 a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available to public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. E. On March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on March 20, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. F. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. G. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared for the Project. H. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan. I. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to and at the public hearing. J. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 13 - adopting the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. K. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Development Plan application hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Conditions. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11-4275, a Development Plan to construct a two-phase residential project on a 22.73 acre site. Phase one will consist of a 325 apartment unit complex and associated amenities. Phase two of the project will consist of 49 age restricted single-family units, generally located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and it shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , 2013. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2013, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA11-0275 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct a two phase residential project on a 22.73 acre site. Phase one will consist of a 325 apartment unit complex and associated amenities. Phase two of the project will consist of 49 age restricted single-family units Assessor's Parcel No.: 961-450-012, 961-450-013, and 961-450-003 MSHCP Category: Residential (Greater than 14.1 DU) DIF Category: Residential (325 Units Attached, 49 Units Detached) TUMF Category: Residential (325 Units Multi -Family, 49 Units Single Family) Quimby Category: Multi -Family Attached (5 or More Units), Single -Family (Attached Garage) Approval Date: 2013 Expiration Date: 2015 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. General Requirements PL -2. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -6. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -7 The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Bella Linda Residential Project Environmental Impact Report. PL -8. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL -9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is riot being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -11. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do riot hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -12. The applicant shall paint a three-foot by three-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. PL -13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL -14. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Spanish Colonial Roof Eagle, Kings Canyon Blend #3634 Stone Eldorado Stone, York Limestone Body Color 1 Frazee Paint, CL2793M, Nankeen Body Color 2 Frazee Paint, CL2915D, Pinesap Body Color 3 Frazee Paint, CL2917N, Hemlock Entry Doors Frazee Paint, CLV1182N Trip Entry Doors Frazee Paint, CLV1182N Thurma Tru Doors, Classic Craft Rustic Trip Collection #CCR8205 Trim Frazee Paint, CLW1O13W, Akamina Iron Work Frazee Paint, CL3187N, Witching Hour Balconies/Stairs PLI-Dek Systems, Inc. Hickory Spanish Eclectic Roof Eagle, Sunset Blend #3646 Body Color 1 Frazee Paint, CLW 1011W, Mere Mortal Body Color 2 Frazee Paint, CL 2734D, Tabby Body Color 3 Frazee Paint, CL 2736N, Almost Ochre Entry Doors Frazee Paint, CL311613, Norwester Entry Doors Along Temecula Thurma Tru Doors, Classic Craft Rustic Parkway/Loma Linda Road Collection #CCR8O4O / Fiber Classic Oak Collection #2150RG Trim Frazee Paint, CLW1 O13 Akamina Iron Work Frazee Paint, CL 3187N, Witching Hour Balconies/Stairs PLI-Dek Systems, Inc. Hickory Monterey Roof Eagle, Fawn Gray Flashed #5582 Brick Eldorado Stone, Solano Camino Adobe Body Color 1 Frazee Paint, CLW 1006W, Ensign Body Color 2 Frazee Paint, CL 2674M, Storm Bay Body Color 3 Frazee Paint, CL 2656N, Bittersweet Entry Doors Frazee Paint, CLC 1288, Bulls Eye Entry Doors Along Temecula Thurma Tru Doors, American Style Parkway/Loma Linda Road Collection #CCA26O With Four Block Dentil Shelf Trim Frazee Paint, CLW 1013W Akamina Balconies/Stairs PLI-Dek Systems, Inc. Hickory Clubhouse/Exercise Room Roof Eagle, Fawn Gray Flashed Stone Eldorado Stone, Solano Camino Adobe Body Color 1 Frazee Paint, CLW 1006W, Ensign Body Color 2 Frazee Paint, CL 2674M, Storm Bay Body Color 3 Frazee Paint, CL 2656N, Bittersweet Entry Doors Trim Frazee Paint, CLC 1288, Bulls Eye Frazee Paint CLW 1013W Akamina PL -15. Trash enclosures with solid roof covers shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. PL -16. For the multi -family component of the project, parking for the project shall be shared across the site, including parking spaces in all lots that are a part of the project. If the project involves multiple lots, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use Agreement, which provides for cross -lot access and parking across all lots. PL -17. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Planning Director. PL -18. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL -19. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. PL -20. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. PL -21. Construction of the landscaped area along Pechanga Parkway north of the project site shall commence pursuant to a preconstruction meeting with the developer, Temecula Community Services District Maintenance Superintendent, Building and Safety Inspector and Public Works Inspector. Developer shall comply with City and Temecula Community Services District review and inspections processes. PL -22. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, or HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped area along Pechanga Parkway north of the project site from western property boundary to the southern property corner of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 11984 and the area identified as lot 53 of Tentative Tract No. 36415. PL -24. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing streetlights shall be paid for by the developer. PL -25. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL -26. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL -27. Double detector check valves shall be installed internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. PL -28. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -29. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. PL -30. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation. PL -31. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. PL -32. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer. PL -33. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. PL -34. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. PL -35. A 30 -day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30 -day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. PL -36. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30 -day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Department approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." PL -37. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. PL -38. The City currently owns parcel 961-450-003 located at the north of the project site. The applicant must provide an analysis of the costs associated with the landscape improvements north of the project site along Pechanga Parkway, and at the developer's expense, provide an appraisal for parcel 961-450-003 and submit a deposit for the City's cost of legal review of the document in order for the City to consider a purchase and sales agreement for relinquishing ownership. PL -39 A County geologic study (GEO) shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the County Geologist. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -40. The following must be completed prior to issuance of building permits for the first multi- family dwelling unit to ensure the construction of the 49 age restricted single-family units: a. Record Final Map to include all grading and infrastructure plans of both communities. b. Grading, utility, and main road work for both communities shall be done in one phase, or in two phases with the age restricted single-family community done first. c. Single Family Private Street A will be completed and all of the 49 age restricted single-family pads shall be graded to finish elevation. d. All infrastructure for utilities for all of the 49 age restricted single family lots shall be installed. e. Perimeter fencing, entry gate, and monument walls for the 49 single-family age restricted lots shall be installed. f. The applicant shall pursue and obtain building permits for at least 16 of the age restricted single-family dwelling units, or the applicant may post securities as approved by the Director of Community Development for all of the 49 age restricted single-family dwelling units. PL -41 The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL -42. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, oras amended bythese conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -43. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL -44. The Landscaping and I rrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verity that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -45. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -46. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -47. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL -48. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verity that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -49. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -50. Roof -mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. PL -51. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL -52. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape (choose or add to as appropriate) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -53. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PL -54. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. PL -55. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional streetlights, whichever occurs first, the developer shall complete the Public Works application, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan, and pay the advanced energy fees. PL -56. The landscape construction drawings for the landscaped area north of the project site along Pechanga Parkway shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works. PL -57. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to install and maintain the landscaped area north of the project site along Pechanga Parkway. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -58. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL -59. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. PL -60. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL -61. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. PL -62. Private common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of the occupancy permit. PL -63. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. PL -64. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL -65. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." PL -66. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. PL -67. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL -68. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PL -69. The landscaped area north of the project site along Pechanga Parkway shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Service; Director of Public Works. (Revised at Planning Commission Public Hearing on March 20, 2013). OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL -70. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated November 15, 2011, a copy of which is attached. PL -71. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated May 14, 2012, a copy of which is attached. PL -72. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated May 2, 2012, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed and submitted to Building and Safety. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. B-2. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-3. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code,2010 California Energy Codes, 2010 California Green building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, Temecula Municipal Code. B-4. Multifamily residential, and parking to comply with Chapter 11A of the 2010 CBC. Indicate at plan submittal, parking type. Assigned or Unassigned. B-5. 2010 California Green Building Standards Provide 10% Voluntary Measures on project B-6. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans. B-7. All ground floor units to be adaptable. B-8. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. B-9. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. B-10. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. B-11. Show path of travel from public right way to all public areas on site (club house, trash enclosures, tot lots, and picnic areas). B-12. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. B-13. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B-14. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B-15. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B-16. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. B-17. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. B-18. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. B-19. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal B-20. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. B-21. Provide a Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2010 edition of the California Building Code. B-22. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. B-23. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-24. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B-25. A pre -construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F-2. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 4 -hour duration for multi -family areas and 1,500 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 2 -hour duration for the single family dwelling area. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-3. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on-site and offsite 6" x 4" x 2-2'/" outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F-4. Maximum cul-de-sac- length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 45 feet (CFC Chapter 5 along with Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-5. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-6. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-7. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-8. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). F-9. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-10. The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14 and Chapter 5). F-11. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F-12. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-13. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-14. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Multi -family residential buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers. Single-family residences and multi -family residential units shall have 4 -inch letters and/or numbers, as approved bythe Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-15. A directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. F-16. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). F-17. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). F-18. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. Applicant shall ensure any landscaping surrounding buildings is kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to prevent would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. PD -2. Applicant shall ensure any trees surrounding building rooftops be kept at a distance to prevent roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. PD -3. Any berms shall not exceed three feet in height. PD -4. Applicant must comply with the standards of title 24 part 6 of the California code of regulations, for residential standards, refer to publication CEC-400-2008-O16-CMF- REV-I. PD -5. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. PD -6. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with Riverside County Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655, low pressure sodium lighting preferred. PD -7. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. PD -8. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be vandal resistant, wall mounted light fixtures. PD -9. All exterior doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. PD -1O. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24- hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP. PD -11. Any roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PD -12. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well - lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. PD -13. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. PD -14. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. g. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. PD -15. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506-5132. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -2. A Grading Permit for rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City -maintained street right-of-way. PW -3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. PW -4. All improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW -5. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls into the design of the project to prevent non -permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm water conveyance system or receiving water during all field activities. PW -6. An updated version of the conceptually -accepted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be submitted to the Department of Public Works as part of the initial grading plan submittal package. PW -7. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be consistent with the accepted WQMP. PW -8. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. PW -9. The vehicular movement for the proposed southerly driveway on Loma Linda Road is restricted to right in/right out only. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW -10. PW -11. PW -12. Prior to any grading permit, the Developer shall record a Grant of Easement which converts the existing drainage easement located along Lots 35 to 52 of Tract Map No. 21067 to an easement for drainage and trail purposes consistent with the Development Plan for Bella Linda. In the event the Developer is not able to record the easement for each affected property, the Developer shall submit a new Development Plan. The Developer shall process the required documents to affect the proposed sale of Lot 87 of Tract Map No. 21067 (APN 961-450-003) from the City to the Developer, including costs of the appraisal and staff/legal review. The Developer shall provide a drainage easement at the southwest corner of the property to accommodate four 10' x 7' reinforced concrete box storm drain facility as shown on the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Project No. PW99-11. PW -13. The WQMP must receive final acceptance by the Department of Public Works. PW -14. PW -15. PW -16. PW -17. The project shall submit a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement that must include the owner's notarized signature, proof of recordation with the County Recorder's Office, and all maintenance procedures for each of the structural treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the WQMP. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with the Construction, Grading and Encroachment Ordinance Section 18.24.140. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. PW -18. The Geologic Study shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the County Geologist PW -19. PW -20. The developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. PW -21. The Developer shall obtain and submit a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). PW -22. PW -23. Construction -phase pollution prevention shall be consistent with the Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 18.15 and associated technical manual and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the PW -24. PW -25. project's Risk Level (RL) determination number, and name, contact information, and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. California Department of Fish and Wildlife b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW -26. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. PW -27. PW -28. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. The developer shall obtain letters of approval for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW -29. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Tract Map No. 36415 shall be approved and recorded. PW -30. The Developer shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). PW -31. Improvement plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Number 20tA. b. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number 800. c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number 400. d. All street and driveway center line intersections shall be at 90 degrees. e. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. PW -32. The developer shall design of the following public improvements outlined in these conditions to the City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. PW -33. PW -34. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. a. Pechanga Parkway from Loma Linda Road to the western property boundary (Urban Arterial (6 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 100A-134' RAN) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, installation of sidewalk, parkway improvements and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), b. Pechanga Parkway from the western property boundary to the southern property corner of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 11984 (Urban Arterial (6 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 100A-134' RAN) to include installation of sidewalk, parkway improvements and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), c. Loma Linda Road (Secondary Arterial (4 lanes undivided) Highway Standard No. 102-88' R/W) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). d. Temecula Lane (General Local Street Standard No. 104-60' RAN) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). The Developer shall design the following private streets to meet City public road standard. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Street "A" (Private Street - 55' RIE) to include installation of full -width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Development Plan. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed bya registered civil or traffic engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. PW -35. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan bya registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW -36. PW -37. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW -38. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Developer shall pay its fair share contribution for offsite improvements as identified in the Project's Traffic Impact Analysis dated November 2012 (Section Hof the EIR). PW -39. PW -40. The project shall demonstrate that all of the structural water quality facilities outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. PW -41. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -42. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -43. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. CC..NTY OF RIVERSIDE • COMi�.JNITY HEALTH AGENCY L � DEPARTMENTNOF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH November 15, 2011 City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Eric Jones P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 F„F 19°1/ 2011 SUBJECT: PA11-0275 — BELLA LINDA DP (APN#961-450-012,013,003) Dear Mr. Jones: In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health (DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH offers the following comments for the project referenced in the subject heading of this letter: POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE This project is proposing Rancho California Water District (RCWD) potable water service and Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) sanitary sewer service. Please note that it is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all requirements to obtain potable water and sanitary sewer service are met with the appropriate water and sewer purveyor, as well as, all other applicable agencies. FOR ANY PROPOSED PUBLIC OR SEMI-PUBLIC SWIMMING POOL/SPA A set of three (3) complete plans for the swimming pool/spa must be submitted to DEH to verify compliance with the California Administrative Code, the California Health and Safety Code, and the Uniform Plumbing Code. Public or Semi-public Swimming Pool/Spa plans should be submitted to: • Department of Environmental Health, District Environmental Services, Murrieta 38740 Sky Canyon Drive. Suite A, Murrieta CA 92563 Attention: Plan Check (951) 461-0284. Plan Check fees are required. Local Entorcement Agency P0. Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502-1280 • (909) 955-8982 • FAX (909) 781-9653 • 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 i6 Riverside CA 92502-1206 • 909) 955-8980 • FAX (909) 955-8903 • 4080 Lemon Street, 2nd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 i . •• • t. • • S • . Eric Jones City of Temecula November 15, 2011 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (HMMB): The facility will require a business emergency plan for the storage of any hazardous materials, including swimming pool/spa chemicals, greater than 55 gallons, 200 cubic feet or 500 pounds, or any acutely hazardous materials or extremely hazardous substances. If further review of the site indicates additional environmental health issues, HMMB reserves the right to regulate the business in accordance with applicable County Ordinances. Please contact HMMB at (951) 766-6524 to obtain information regarding any additional requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PHASE I STUDY: An Environmental Assessment (EA) Phase I study will be required prior to Planning Department approval of this project. Please submit an EA Phase I study and applicable review fees to DEH Environmental Cleanups Program (ECP). For further information, please contact ECP at (951) 955-8982. Phase I Environmental Assessment — The intent of a Phase I Assessment is to determine if any chemicals or pesticides were used on the property, the location of use, and any possible lingering negative effects. This condition requires the applicant to compile sufficient information about the property and land uses to aid the Department in making a determination of whether additional investigation is needed. If concerns are identified in this report, a Phase II Assessment would be required. RETENTION BASINS — NO VECTORS: All proposed retention basins must be constructed and maintained in a manner that prevents vector breeding and vector nuisances. If you have any questions regarding thisletter please contact me at (951) 955-8980. S. ichael Mistica, MBA, REHS Environmental Protection and Oversight Division Land Use and Water Resources Program 2 Board of Directors President and Treasurer Joseph J. Kuebler, CPA Vice President Philip E. Paule Ronald W. Sullivan Randy A. Record David J. Slawson General Manager Paul D. Jones II, P.E. Director of The Metropolitan Water District of So. Calif. Randy A. Record . Board Secretary and Assistant to the General Manager Rosemarie V. Howard Legal Counsel Redwine and Sherrill EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT May 14, 2012 SINCE 1950 Eric Jones City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Bella Linda Development Plan (PA11-0275), General Plan Amendment, Zone change/Planned Development Overlay (PA11-0276, Tentative Tract Map (PA11-0277) Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report Dear Mr. Jones: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the above referenced project. The proposed project will require the approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Professional Office (PO) to High Density (H) residential, a Zone Change from Professional Office (PO) to Planned Development Overlay zoning (to establish development criteria), a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the property into fifty-seven lots, and a Development Plan. The project is a two-phase residential development. Phase one will consist of 325 apartment units totaling 462,622 square feet. Phase two of the project will consist of creating lots for 49 senior single-family units. The project will feature meandering trail along Loma Linda Road and Pechanga Parkway, and bio-swale. An additional 0.91 acres of project area is located off-site immediately to the north of the project site. The subject project requires sewer service from EMWD. At this time, based on current project information, EMWD can accommodate service to this proposed development by directing sewer discharge to at least two nearby collection systems. The details of said service connection points will be further detailed in a separate document, known as EMWD's Plan Of Service, which is currently in process. Mailing Address: Post Office Box 8300 Perris, CA 92572-8300 Telephone: (951) 928-3777 Fax: (951) 928-6177 Location: 2270 Trumble Road Perris, CA 92570 Internet : www.emwd.org City of Temecula May 14, 2012 Page 2 Again, EMWD appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please forward the Draft Environmental Impact Report to the attention of Helen Stratton at the mailing address shown on page one. If you have questions concerning these comments, please feel free to contact Helen Stratton at 951 928-3777, Ext. 4545, or Eli Rodriguez at Ext. 4450. Sincerely, L1 Joseph B. Lewis Director of Engineering Services JBL:kah cc: E. Rodriguez (e) Rancho Water Board of Directors John E. Hoagland President Ben R. Drake Sr. Vice President Stephen J. Corona Lisa D. Herman William E. Plummer Roland C. Skumawitz James "Stew" Stewart Officers Matthew G. Stone General Manager Richard S. Williamson. P.E. Assistant General Manager Jeffrey D. Armstrong Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer N. Craig Elitharp, P.E. Director of Operations & Maintenance Perry R. Louck Director of Planning Andrew L. Webster, P.E. Chief Engineer Kelli E. Garcia District Secretary James B. Gilpin Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel May 2, 2012 Eric Jones City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PA11-0276; TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. PA11-0277, DEVELOPMENT PLAN PA11-0275; APNS 961-450-012 AND 961-450-013 [ESA (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT)] Dear Eric: Please be advised that the above -referenced project/property is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD/District). The subject project/property fronts an existing 24 -inch diameter water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Pechanga Parkway, an existing 16 -inch diameter water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Loma Linda Road, and an 8 -inch water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Temecula Lane. The subject project/property also fronts an existing 16 -inch diameter recycled water pipeline (1381 Pressure Zone) within Pechanga Parkway and an existing 8 - inch diameter recycled water pipeline (1381 Pressure Zone) within Loma Linda Road. Water service to the subject project/property exists (under Account Nos. 01- 08-17500-7 and 01-08-16800-6) under Vacant Long -Term service. Additions or modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water service to individual lots will require the extension of water facilities within dedicated public and/or private right-of-ways. Individual water meters will be required for each lot and/or project unit, including separate water meters for landscape irrigation, as applicable. Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing of the subject project/property development relative to water supply shortage contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances), and/or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment, as determined by the Lead Agency. Rancho California Water District X3135 Wimhester Road • Poet Office Box 9017 • Temecula. California 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 Eric Jones/City of Temecula May 2, 2012 Page Two In accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5, the project/property will be required to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation, which should be noted as a condition for any subsequent development plans. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. As soon as feasible, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project -specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project -specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District. If no sewer service is currently available to the subject project/property, all proposed waste discharge systems must comply with the State Water Resources Control Board and/or the basin plan objectives and the permit conditions issued by the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at the District office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Jake Wiley, P.E. Associate Engineer cc: Corey Wallace, Engineering Manager -Design Warren Back, Engineering Manager -Planning Heath McMahon, Construction Contracts Manager Corry Smith, Engineering Services Supervisor 12 JW:hab0 17F450\FEG Rancho California Water District 421:35 Winchester Road • Post Office Bos 9017 • Temecula. California 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6906 • FAX (951) 296-6860 www.ranchowater.com PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD" (PA11-0275, PA11-0276, PA11-0277) (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application No. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. D. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 17, 2013 and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA12-0275 a Development Plan, with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the recommendation for approval of Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11- 0275, a Development Plan, (the `Project"). A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Development Plan Application, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and an EIR was required. B. On April 12, 2012, a Notice of Preparation was released to all agencies and persons that might be affected by the project. C. On April 30, 2012, a scoping session was held at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), City staff prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analyzing the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Development Plan and associated applications ("the Project"), as described in the EIR. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared. E. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available to public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. F. Seven written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and Incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. The Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR and corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations and all comments received regarding these documents prior to and at the March 20, 2013 public hearing and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with regard to temporary construction noise; and (3) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. H. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Environmental Impact Report, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared for this project set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of April, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (PA11- 0275, PA11-0276, PA11-0277) (APN 961-450-012, 961- 450-013, AND 961-450-003) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application No. PA11-0276, a Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA") C. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for approving the Project. D. On April 12, 2012, in accordance with CEQA Guideline Section 15082, the City published a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) and circulated it to governmental agencies, organizations, and persons that may be interested in the Project, within 600 feet of the Specific Plan boundaries. The NOP requested that comments on the topics to be analyzed in the Draft EIR for the Project be submitted to the City by May 12, 2012. On April, 30, 2012 in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15082(c)(1), the City held a public scoping meeting to obtain comments from interested parties on the scope of the Draft EIR. 1 E. In response to the NOP, written comments were received from various individuals and organizations. These comment letters assisted the City in formulating the analysis in the Draft EIR. F. The City's EIR consultants thereafter prepared, in accordance with CEQA, a Draft EIR for the Project (State Clearinghouse Number 2012041038). G. Upon completion of the Draft EIR in December 2012, the City initiated a public comment period by filing a Notice of Completion with the State Office of Planning and Research on December 3, 2012. The City also published a Notice of Availability for the Draft EIR on January 20, 2013 in The Californian, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. H. The Draft EIR was circulated for public review from January 20, 2013 through and including March 6, 2013. Copies of the Draft EIR were sent to various public agencies, as well as to organizations and individuals requesting copies. In addition, the City placed copies of the Draft EIR at the City's library and made copies available for review at the City offices and on the City's website. I. In response to the Draft EIR, written comments were received from various agencies, individuals, and organizations. The City responded to all written comments. Those comments and the responses thereto are included as part of the Final Environmental Impact Report/Response to Comments document (Final EIR). The Final EIR consists of the DEIR, Comments and Responses to Comments, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the Errata listing changes made to the Draft EIR in response to comments. J. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.5, not later than March 6, 2013, the City prepared and provided to all commenting public agencies its responses to all written comments. K. On March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on March 20, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. L. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing and architectural enhancements. 2 M. The Planning Commission, at its regularly scheduled meeting on April 17, 2013, considered the Project and environmental review at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the Project and the Draft EIR. N. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 13-_ recommending that the City Council certify the Final EIR prepared for the Bella Linda Residential Project, adopt Findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution Nos. 13-_, thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions, including adoption of a Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay, Tentative Tract Map, and Development Plan related to the approval of the Project. O. Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that the City, before approving a project for which an EIR is required, make one or more of the following written finding(s) for each significant effect identified in the EIR accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR; or, 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency; or, 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. P. Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that if a project will cause significant unavoidable adverse impacts, the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to approving the project. A Statement of Overriding Considerations states that any significant adverse project effects are acceptable if expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. Q. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR that are found to be less than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section IV of Exhibit A to this Resolution. Exhibit A, Findings and Facts in Support of Findings, is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. 3 R. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR that are found to be less than significant through the imposition of mitigation are described in Section V of Exhibit A to this Resolution. S. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures are described in Section VI of Exhibit A to this Resolution. T. Alternatives to the Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Section VII of Exhibit A of this Resolution. U. A discussion of the project benefits identified by City staff and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the environmental impacts that cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level are set forth in Exhibit B to this Resolution, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. V. Public Resources Code section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for any project for which mitigation measures have been imposed to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit C, and is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. W. Prior to taking action the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered the information and data in the administrative record, as well as oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings. comments or any additional information submitted to the City have produced any substantial new information requiring additional environmental review or re -circulation of the EIR under CEQA because no new significant environmental impacts were identified, nor was any substantial increase in the severity of any previously disclosed environmental impacts identified. X. Custodian of Records. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is the custodian of records, and the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based are located at the Office of the City Clerk, City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. Section 2. Substantive Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula, California does hereby: A. Declare that the City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the Final Environmental Impact Report, the written and oral comments on the Draft EIR, staff reports and responses to comments incorporated into the Final EIR, and all testimony related to environmental issues. 4 B. Determine that the Final EIR fully analyzes and discloses the potential impacts of the Project, and that those impacts have been mitigated or avoided to the extent feasible for the reasons set forth in the Findings attached hereto as Exhibit A, with the exception of those impacts found to be significant and unmitigable as discussed therein. C. Declare that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City. The City Council further finds that the additional information provided in the staff reports, in comments on the Draft EIR, the responses to comments on the Draft EIR, and the evidence presented in written and oral testimony does not constitute new information requiring recirculation of the EIR under CEQA. None of the information presented has deprived the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial environmental impact of the Project or a feasible mitigation measure or alternative that the City has declined to implement. D. Certify the Final EIR as being in compliance with CEQA. The City Council further adopts the findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference. The City Council further determines that all of the findings made in this Resolution (including Exhibit A) are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Final EIR and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and in the record of the proceedings. The City Council further finds that each of the overriding benefits stated in Exhibit B, by itself, would justify proceeding with the Project despite any significant unavoidable impacts identified in the Final EIR or alleged to be significant in the record of proceedings. E. The City Council hereby imposes as a condition on the Bella Linda Residential Project each mitigation measure specified in Exhibit C, and directs City staff to implement and to monitor the mitigation measures as described in Exhibit C. 5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , 2013. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2013, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 6 Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk FINDINGS AND FACTS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS I. Introduction. The California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq. ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000, et seq. (the "Guidelines") provide that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified that identifies one or more significant effects on the environment caused by the project unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findings: A. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. B. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. C. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following environmental findings in connection with the proposed Bella Linda Residential Development (the "Project"), as more fully described in the Final EIR. These findings are based upon written and oral evidence included in the record of these proceedings, comments on the Draft EIR and the written responses thereto, and reports presented to the Planning Commission and the City Council by City staff and the City's environmental consultants. II. Project Objectives. As set forth in the EIR, objectives that the City of Temecula seeks to achieve with this Project (the "Project Objectives") are as follows: A. Create a high-quality residential community on the project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market; B. Provide a project that is compatible in density and character to the surround residential communities; C. Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 year old and older population; D. Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and increased demand for housing. 1 III. Effects Determined to be Less Than Significant/No Impact in the Initial Study The City of Temecula conducted an Initial Study in February, 2012, to determine significant effects of the Project. In the course of this evaluation certain impacts were found to be less than significant due to the inability of a project of this scope to create such impacts or the absence of project characteristics producing effects of this type. The following issue areas were determined not to be significant for the reasons set forth in the Initial Study and were not analyzed in the EIR: (A) Aesthetics; (B) Agricultural and Forest Resources; (C) Mineral Resources; and (D) Recreation. Impacts related to the following issue areas were found to be potentially significant and were studied in the EIR: (A) Air Quality; (B) Biological Resources; (C) Green House Gas Emissions (D) Cultural Resources; (E) Geology and Soils; (F) Hazards and Hazardous Materials; (G) Hydrology and Water Quality; (H) Land Use and Planning; (I) Noise; (J) Population and Housing; (K) Public Services; (L) Transportation and Traffic; (M) Utilities and Service Systems. A. On April 12, 2012, in accordance with CEQA Guideline Section 15082, the City published a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) and circulated it to governmental agencies, organizations, and persons that may be interested in the Project. The NOP requested comments within 30 days of the notice. On April 30, 2012, in accordance with CEQA Section 15082(c)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City held a public scoping meeting to obtain comments from interested parties on the scope of the Draft EIR. No comments were received on areas other than those found to be potentially significant in the Initial Study. IV. Effects Determined to be Less Than Significant Without Mitigation in the EIR The Draft EIR completed on December 3, 2012 found that the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact without the imposition of mitigation on a number of environmental topic areas. The less than significant environmental impact determination was made for each of the following topic areas listed below, based on the more expansive discussions contained in the EIR. A. Air Quality 1. The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. 2. The Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors) 3. The Project would not expose Sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations 4. The Project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. 2 A. Biological Resources 1. The Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2. The Project would not have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. 3. The Project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. 4. The Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. 5. The Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. B. Geology and Soils 1. The Project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: a. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault. b. Strong seismic ground shaking. c. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction. d. Landslides 2. The Project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. 3. The Project is not located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. 4. The Project is not located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property. 3 5. The Project does not have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. C. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1. The Project would not generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. 2. The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 1. The Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. 2. The Project is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. 3. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. 4. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. E. Hydrology and Water Quality 1. The Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. 2. The project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted). 3. The project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. 4. The project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site. 4 5. The Project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. 6. The Project would not require the preparation of a project -specific WQMP. 7. The Project would not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. 8. The Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. 9. The Project would not cause inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. F. Land Use and Planning 1. Project implementation would not physically divide an established community. 2. Project implementation would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. 3. The Project would not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. G. Noise 1. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, the Project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. H. Population and Housing 1. The Project would not induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure). 2. The Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 3. The Project would not displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 5 Public Services 1. The Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, other public facilities. J. Transportation/Traffic 1. Implementation of the Project would not conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways. 2. Project implementation would not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. 3. Project implementation would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm eq uipment). 4. Project implementation would not result in inadequate emergency access. 5. Project implementation would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. K. Utilities and Service Systems 1. The Project would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2. The Project would not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. 3. The Project would not require pr result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. 4. The Project would not result in insufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed. 6 5. The Project would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments. 6. The Project would not result in insufficient permitted capacity by a landfill to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs. 7. The Project would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. V. Potentially Significant Environmental Impacts Determined to be Mitigated to a Less Than Significant Level The Draft EIR identified the potential for the Project to cause significant environmental impacts in the areas of air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, noise and traffic and circulation. With the exception of specific impacts to noise discussed in Section VI, measures have been identified that would mitigate all of the impacts in this section to a less than significant level. The City Council finds that the feasible mitigation measures for the Project identified in the Final EIR would reduce the Project's impacts to a less than significant level, with the exception of those unmitigable impacts discussed in Section VI. The City Council adopts all of the feasible mitigation measures for the Project described in the Final EIR as conditions of approval of the Project and incorporates those into the Project, as discussed more fully in Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. A. Air Quality 1. The Project could violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Impact Air -1: The Project's construction emissions would exceed SCAQMD's daily NOx significance threshold during the grading and excavation phase and air quality impacts associated with NOx would be significant. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project which avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant environmental effects to air quality. Specifically, the following measures have been included to ensure that the Project's potential air quality impacts remain less than significant. Measure Air -1: All construction equipment used onsite during project construction shall meet, at a minimum, EPA Tier II certification requirements. As an alternative, the applicant may opt to apply other available technologies to the construction equipment that would achieve at least a 15 percent reduction in NOx emissions than the use of Tier II construction equipment. Where alternatives to EPA Tier II are chosen for the proposed project, the applicant shall be required to show evidence to the City that a 15 percent reduction in NOx emissions would be achieved. 7 Facts in Support of Findings Implementation of Mitigation Measure Air -1 would reduce the NOx emissions generated during the Project's grading and excavation phase to below the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) daily significance threshold by requiring all construction equipment used at the project site to meet, at a minimum, EPA Tier II certification requirements. Equipment that meets Tier 11 emission standards is certified as such by the USEPA by the manufacturer. Table 3.1-6 of the Draft EIR provides the reductions in emission that would be achieved with the use of this construction equipment. With the minimum standard of Tier II construction equipment, the predicted total NOx daily maximum emissions would be 94.30 lbs per day, which would be below the regional SCQAMD significance threshold of 100 lbs per day. Thus, with implementation of Mitigation Measure Air -1, the NOx emissions generated by the project during the grading and excavation phase would be reduced to below SCAQMD's daily significance threshold. Therefore, this impact would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. B. Biological Resources 1. The Project has the potential to impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This includes Burrowing Owls. Impact Bio -1: Impacts to raptors and other migratory birds include direct loss of potential foraging and nesting habitat. Potential nesting habitat onsite includes mature trees and shrubs as well as grassland (in the case of ground -nesting birds such as northern harrier and mourning dove). It is possible that raptors and other migratory birds would nest onsite due to the proximity to open space and preserved lands such as Temecula Creek and the Pechanga Reservation lands. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect to biological resources. Specifically, the following mitigation measures will ensure that no significant impacts occur to biological resources. Mitigation Measure Bio -1: Impacts to raptors and other migratory birds shall be avoided by the implementation of one of the following measures: All construction and ground disturbing activities shall take place outside of the raptor breeding season (February 1 - August 30). ii. If construction and ground disturbing activities are necessary during the breeding season (February 1 - August 30), a focused survey for active nests of raptors and migratory birds shall be conducted by a biologist (a person possessing a bachelors in science with a 8 minimum of one year nest survey experience performing raptor surveys). The survey shall occur a maximum of 14 days prior to any construction or ground -disturbing activities. If active nest(s) (with eggs or fledglings) are identified within the project site, (California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for state listed species, species of special concern, and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) covered species; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for birds covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and listed species) they shall not be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged (matured to a state that they can leave the nest on their own). A 500 -foot construction setback from any active nesting location shall be adhered to in order to avoid disturbance of the nest until the young have fledged or the nest has failed, as determined by a qualified biologist. If no active nests are identified, construction may commence. Impact Bio -2: Burrowing Owls could inhabit the site prior to project construction as appropriate burrowing owl foraging and nesting habitat is present. Potential impacts to this species would include loss of foraging and nesting (i.e., burrowing) habitat. Burrowing Owls present during grading and other construction related activities have the potential to be killed or displaced through burrow collapse and other impacts. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect to biological resources. Specifically, the following mitigation measures will ensure that no significant impacts occur to biological resources. Mitigation Measure Bio -2: he entire project site shall be surveyed by a qualified biologist (i.e., approved by CDFG) using CDFG approved Burrowing Owl survey protocols a maximum of 30 days prior to construction to determine presence/absence of Burrowing Owl (CDFG, 2012). If no Burrowing Owls are identified on the site during these pre - construction surveys, no additional mitigation is necessary and construction can commence. If Burrowing Owl(s) are found onsite, CDFG, the City, and RCA will be notified. The following species-specific mitigation actions would be required if Burrowing Owls are found: Sheltering in place of nesting owls until nest fledges or fails, as determined by a qualified biologist (a Bachelor's of Science degree or equivalent experience and a minimum of one year of previous burrowing owl monitoring experience). ii. Preparing and implementing an active translocation plan, if appropriate and approved, and identifying a receptor site for the owl(s) (per WRC MSHCP and CDFG). 9 Facts in Support of Findings If occupied by raptors, migratory birds, and/or burrowing owls at the time of construction, development of the project site could result in impacts to these species. Given the timing of construction is unknown and occupation of the project site by these species could change over time, pre -construction measures must be implemented to ensure that impacts would not occur. The mitigation measures proposed will ensure that no activity will take place that will endanger these sensitive species by requiring that construction and ground disturbing activities do not take place during breeding seasons (February 1 — August 30) unless preconstruction nest/burrow surveys have been conducted. If sensitive species are found, they are to be avoided with a 500 -foot setback. A 500 -foot setback is widely accepted as a reasonable guideline by the wildlife agencies for migratory bird species and most raptors (the generally accepted set -back for migratory bird nests is 200-300 feet, for raptors 500 feet). The burrowing owl mitigation follows the CDFG March 17, 2012 staff report specifying the requirements for protection of this species. In addition, this setback must be adhered to until a qualified biologist has determined the animals will no longer be negatively impacted by construction or ground disturbing activities. These mitigation measures will reduce project impacts to a less than significant level. C. Cultural Resources 1. Impacts to Historic and Archaeological Resources Impact Cultural -1: The results of the Extended Phase I investigation, which included archival research, geoarchaeological review, Native American contact, field survey, and Extended Phase I testing, suggest the project area is sensitive for cultural resources. In addition, representatives of the Pechanga Tribe indicate the project area is sensitive for cultural resources, and that the project area is within the Luiseno Ancestral Origin Landscape Area, one of the most sacred areas for the Pechanga Tribe. Although the lack of identified subsurface archaeological materials greatly reduces the likelihood of encountering buried archaeological resources as a result of project implementation, it does not preclude this possibility entirely. The Pechanga Tribe was consulted in preparation of this EIR section. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect to known cultural resources. Specifically, the following mitigation measure will ensure a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure Cultural -1: Retention of a Qualified Archaeologist: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground -disturbing activity, the applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (Department of the Interior, 2012) to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources (Mitigation Measures Cultural -2, -3 and -5). 10 Mitigation Measure Cultural -2: Cultural Resources Training: The qualified archeologist, or an archaeologist working under the direction of the qualified archaeologist, along with a representative designated by the Pechanga Tribe, shall conduct pre -construction cultural resources worker sensitivity training to inform construction personnel of the types of cultural resources that may be encountered, and to bring awareness to personnel of actions to be taken in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The applicant shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and shall retain documentation demonstrating attendance. Mitigation Measure Cultural -3: Archaeological Monitoring: Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the qualified archaeologist shall designate an archaeological monitor to observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The archaeological monitor shall keep daily logs. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring activities, which shall be submitted to the City, Pechanga Tribe, and to the Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside. Mitigation Measure Cultural -4: Native American Monitoring: At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Pechanga Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City and the Pechanga Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement (Agreement). The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. A minimum of 30 days prior to issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground -disturbing activity, a Native American monitor from the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the applicant to monitor all ground -disturbing activities including, but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, as specified in the Plan and Agreement. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more locations, additional Native American monitors may be required. Mitigation Measure Cultural -5: Unanticipated Archaeological Resources Discoveries: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are made during ground -disturbing activities, the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the City Planning Director for decision. The City Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the CEQA with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the 11 Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. Mitigation Measure Cultural -6: Curation: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are recovered as a result of project implementation to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition as outlined in the Agreement (Mitigation Measure Cultural -4). Mitigation Measure Cultural -7: Discovery of Sacred Sites: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. Facts in Support of Findings The retention of a qualified archeologist and cultural resources worker sensitivity training will ensure all involved in the construction of the project are aware of the potential to inadvertently discover sensitive historic and architectural resources. The required monitoring by a qualified archeologist and Pechanga Tribe representative will ensure that any archeological and historic resources are identified and that further work will not disturb these artifacts until they are properly identified and removed from the site. Furthermore, the mitigation requires that culturally sensitive items be released to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment. In addition, if an area is discovered that is determined to be sacred, this area shall be avoided. These measures will reduce Project impacts to a less than significant level. 2. Impacts to Paleontological Resources Impact Cultural -2: If site preparation activities require grading ten or more feet below the ground surface, there could be the potential to disturb and impact significant paleontological resources. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant impact on any potential discovery of paleontological resources. Specifically, Mitigation Measures Cultural -8 through 10 will ensure a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure Cultural -8: Paleontological Resources Training: Prior to construction, a training session on the recognition of the types of paleontological resources that could be encountered within the project area and the procedures to be followed if they are found shall be presented to project construction personnel by a qualified cultural resources professional. This training may be conducted concurrently with the cultural resources training required in Mitigation Measure Cultural -2. Mitigation Measure Cultural -9: Paleontological Resources Monitoring: During construction, should excavations be greater than ten feet in depth, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained and shall designate a paleontological monitor to observe the 12 sediments. Should these sediments appear to have a greater potential for fossils, paleontological monitoring of ground disturbing activities below ten feet shall commence until such a time as the excavation of these sediments has ceased, or upon determination by the qualified paleontologist that the likelihood of encountering paleontological resources is unlikely. Mitigation Measure Cultural -10: Unanticipated Paleontological Resources Discoveries: If construction or other project personnel discover any potential fossils during construction, or Project operations and maintenance, regardless of the depth of work, work within 100 feet of the discovery location should cease and a qualified paleontologist should be called to further assess the discovery and make further recommendations as necessary. Facts in Support of Findings Temecula's General Plan (implementation measure OS -26) requires that a paleontologist be retained to observe grading activities in areas where the probable presence of paleontological resources is identified. However, significant paleontological resources can be uncovered even in areas of low sensitivity, and it is possible that ground -disturbing construction activities associated with the construction of the project could result in the inadvertent discovery of paleontological resources, which could be a significant impact. Therefore, Mitigation Measures Cultural 8 through 10 will be implemented to ensure any potential impacts to paleontological resources are minimized to be less than significant. 3. Disturbance of Human Remains Impact Cultural -3: Because the proposed Project would involve ground - disturbing activities, it is possible that such actions could unearth, expose, or disturb previously unknown human remains interred outside of a formal cemetery. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential for the disturbance of human remains. Specifically, Mitigation Measure Cultural -11 will ensure a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure Cultural -11: Human Remains Discoveries: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notificationof the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and the Agreement described in Mitigation Measure Cultural -4. 13 Facts in Support of Findings It is unlikely that human remains would be encountered as a result of the proposed project. However, in the unlikely event that human remains are discovered, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, the human remains could be inadvertently damaged, which could be a significant impact. Because Mitigation Measure Cultural -11 would require the immediate halting of the construction activity and that no further disturbance would occur to the burials, this mitigation measure would avoid significant impacts to the burials. The Riverside County Coroner would be required to make the necessary findings as to origin and proper treatment and disposition would be arranged and implemented. This measure also provides for the appropriate notification and coordination with the Native American Heritage Commission and the "most likely descendant(s)" in order to address any specific tribal treatments or protocols for the treatment of the remains. For these reasons, Mitigation Measure Cultural -11 would avoid significant impacts to human remains that may be inadvertently discovered during project construction. D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 1. Impacts to the public or environment through transport, use, disposal or accidental release of hazardous materials. Impact Haz-1: Hazardous materials used onsite during construction activities (i.e., petroleum products, solvents, paints, etc.) could be released to the environment through improper handling or storage, resulting in a potentially significant impact. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduces the impacts to less than significant. Specifically, Mitigation Measure Haz- 1 shall be implemented. Mitigation Measure Haz-1: The use of construction best management practices shall be implemented as part of construction to minimize the potential negative effects of accidental release of hazardous materials to groundwater and soils. These shall include the following: Follow manufacturer's recommendations on use, storage and disposal of chemical products used in construction; ii. Avoid overtopping construction equipment fuel gas tanks; During routine maintenance of construction equipment, properly contain and remove grease and oils; iv. Properly dispose of discarded containers of fuels and other chemicals in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and local and state regulations. 14 Facts in Support of Findings Construction activities would require the use of certain hazardous materials such as fuels, oils, solvents, and glues. Inadvertent release of large quantities of these materials into the environment could adversely impact soil, surface waters, or groundwater quality. However, the onsite storage and/or use of large quantities of materials capable of impacting soil and groundwater are not typically required for a project of this proposed size and type. Given that the exact nature and quantities of hazardous materials to be used during the construction process are not detailed at this time, it is possible that the construction project would result in a significant impact related to hazardous materials through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials if the construction project was not managed with care and adherence to proper controls at the construction site. This mitigation measure is designed to ensure that construction activities occur in a manner that follows standard best practices and reduces the potential, or likelihood, or significant impacts related to the use of these materials. Mitigation Measure Haz-1 requires the implementation of these measures including: following manufacturer's recommendations on use, storage and disposal of chemical products; properly containing and removing grease and oils; and disposing of fuels and other chemicals in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and local and state regulations. Following Mitigation Measure Haz-1 will ensure that potential impacts related to hazardous materials are controlled to a less than significant level. E. Noise 1. Temporary construction activities could result in exposure of persons to excessive levels of ground -borne vibration levels. Impact Noise -2: Construction of the proposed project may expose residences to the west of the project site to vibration levels that would exceed the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) 80 VdB threshold for residences or places where people may sleep. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that would lessen the significant ground -borne vibration impacts associated with construction activities. Specifically, measures have been included to reduce noise impacts from construction activities associated with the project that would result in exposure of sensitive receptors to excessive levels of ground -borne vibration within the Project area to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure Noise -7. Mitigation Measure Noise -7: The operation of construction equipment that generates high levels of vibration, such as large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills, shall be prohibited within 45 feet of existing nearby residential structures during construction of the proposed project. Instead, small rubber -tired bulldozers shall be used within this area during grading and excavation operations. The use of small rubber -tired bulldozers would result in vibration levels of 0.002 PPV and 57 VdB at the residences to the west of the project site, which would not exceed the FTA's vibration criteria for building damage and human annoyance. 15 Facts in Support of Findings Implementation of Mitigation Measure Noise -7, which would prohibit the use of construction equipment that generates high levels of vibration (i.e., large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills) within specified distances from existing offsite residential uses that are located nearby the proposed project, would ensure that the construction -related vibration impacts associated with human annoyance at these nearby receptors would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. Controlling the type of equipment to be used in the vicinity of the residences to preclude the use of high vibration equipment (large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills) would result in a corresponding decrease in the anticipated vibration levels at the residences located to the west of the project site. As show in Table 3.9-10 of the EIR, large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills would result in vibration levels more than 20 VdB above the use of small bulldozers (with rubber tires). Thus, with these limitations, it is anticipated that vibration levels at nearby sensitive receptors would not exceed 65 VdB. For these reasons, limiting these types of high vibration equipment would more than provide for the decrease in vibration necessary to reduce the impact below 80 VdB, which is the threshold of significance. With implementation of mitigation measures and the avoidance of use of construction equipment that generate high levels of vibration, the vibration impact at offsite residential uses located immediately west of the project site would be less than significant. 2. Permanent increase in ambient noise levels. Impact Noise -3: Operation of the proposed Project could expose nearby sensitive resources to noise levels exceeding 5 dB due to operation of heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment at the Project site. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce the noise level impacts so that operational noise levels do not exceed applicable noise standards and the impact would therefore be less than significant. Mitigation Measure Noise -8: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that all new HVAC or mechanical equipment associated with the proposed Project be designed with adequate shielding (e.g., via rooftop parapet or enclosure) or noise muffling devices to ensure that noise levels would not exceed the ambient noise level on the premises of other occupied residential properties located offsite by more than five decibels. Mitigation Measure Noise -9: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that all exterior windows associated with the proposed residential uses at the project site shall be constructed to provide a sufficient amount of sound insulation to ensure that interior noise levels would be below an Ldn or CNEL of 45 dB in any habitable room. 16 Facts in Support of Findings As part of the proposed Project, new mechanical equipment and Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units and exhaust fans may be installed on the proposed residential units. The noise levels generated by the new HVAC units and exhaust fans for the proposed project could potentially disturb the existing surrounding residential uses to the Project site. In particular, the residential uses located immediately west of the Project site, across the concrete -lined flood channel, would be exposed to the highest noise levels due to their proximity to the Project site. However, as an industry practice, the design of the onsite HVAC units and other noise -generating mechanical equipment associated with the new residential units at the project site would typically be installed on the rooftops of the residential structures and would be equipped with noise muffling devices or shielding to reduce noise levels that may affect nearby noise - sensitive uses. Additionally, according to Section 9.20.030 (Exemptions) of the Temecula Municipal Code, sound emanating from heating and air conditioning equipment are exempt from the City's noise standards. Nonetheless, to ensure that the nearby noise -sensitive uses to the project site would not be adversely affected by any HVAC equipment noise, Mitigation Measure Noise -8 would be implemented, which prohibits noise from HVAC equipment from exceeding the ambient noise level on the premises of other occupied properties by more than 5 dB. Furthermore, in order to ensure that onsite operational noise would not adversely affect the future residents at the project site, Mitigation Measure Noise -9 would be implemented to ensure that all exterior windows associated with the proposed residential uses would be constructed such that sufficient sound insulation is provided to ensure that interior noise levels would be below a Ldn (average A -weighted noise level during a 24-hour day) or CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) of 45 dB in any residential unit. Mitigation Measures Noise 8 and 9 will ensure long term noises generated by the project will be reduced to less than significant levels. F. Transportation/Traffic 1. Conflict with the Circulation System Impact Circ -1: The proposed Project would result in significant impacts at the following intersections under the Project Phase 1 Opening Year (2015) Conditions: 1. 1-15 SB Ramps at Temecula Parkway — AM and PM Peak Hour 2. Wolf Valley Road at Pechanga Parkway — PM Peak Hour a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce impacts to intersections therefore impacts will be less than significant. 17 Mitigation Measure Circ -1: The City shall provide for timing optimization at the following locations, funded by the Project proponent/developer: 1. Intersection of 1-15 SB Ramps and Temecula Parkway — Am and PM Peak Hour: Signal timing optimization will occur to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix 0 of the Traffic Study. a. Improved AM operations to LOS D, delay of 42.1 seconds. Improved PM operations to LOS D, delay of 52 seconds. b. Fair share contribution for this mitigation measure is 15%. 2. Intersection of Wolf Valley Road at Pechanga Parkway — PM Peak Hour: Signal timing optimization: Cycle lengths were changed from 90 seconds to 150 seconds in the PM peak hour. Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix 0 of the Traffic Study. a. Improved PM operations to LOS D, delay of 40.6 seconds. b. Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 12%. Facts in Support of Findings After mitigation, both intersections would operate at LOS (Level of Service) D. Delay at the intersection of 1-15 SB Ramps and Temecula Parkway would be improved to 42.1 seconds for the AM peak hour and 52.8 seconds for the PM peak hour. Delay at the intersection of Wolf Valley Road and Pechanga Parkway would be improved to 40.6 seconds in the PM peak hour. Mitigation Measure Circ -1 would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Impact Circ -2: Under Future Buildout (2035) Plus Project conditions, intersections at the following locations would operate at or below LOS D, resulting in potentially significant impacts: 1. 1-15 NB Ramps at Temecula Parkway — AM Peak Hour 2. Rainbow Canyon Road at Pechanga Parkway — PM Peak Hour a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce the impacts from cumulative traffic impacts to less than significant. Mitigation Measure Circ -2: The following improvements shall be made by the City of Temecula, and funded by the project proponent/developer: 1. At the intersection of 1-15 NB Ramps and Temecula Parkway, restripe westbound third through lane to shared through -right turn lane. Signal optimization will occur to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix 0 of the Traffic Study. 18 a. Improved AM operations to LOS C, delay of 28.4 seconds. b. Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 4%. c. This intersection is within Caltrans jurisdiction and therefore any proposed mitigation measures require Caltrans approval. 2. At the intersection of Pechanga Parkway at Rainbow Canyon Road, change eastbound right turn permissive phase to overlap. Signal optimization will occur by changing cycle lengths from 90 seconds to 110 seconds in the PM peak hour. Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix 0 of the Traffic Study. a. Improved PM operations to LOS C, delay of 28.9 seconds. b. Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 9%. Facts in Support of Findings All though local roadway segments are projected to operate unacceptably under Future Buildout (2035) Conditions, the plus project conditions reduce the average daily trips (ADT) on each roadway and, therefore, do not impact the facilities. The proposed project would not contribute to the projected congestion levels, and thus, does not have a significant impact on these roadway segments as highlighted in the below table. TABLE 1 ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE — FUTURE BUILDOUT (2035) PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS PROJEC PLUS T BASE PROJEC TRAFFI INCREAS ROADWAY FROM TO ADT T ADT C E MARGARITA RD DARTOLO RD TEMECUL 42,260 42,006 -254 -0.60% A PKWY TEMECULA PKWY 1-15 FWY NB BEDFORD 76,910 75,893 -1,017 -1.32% RAMPS CT PECHANGA PKWY RAINBOW MURFIELD 56,400 54,166 -2,234 -3.96% CANYON RD DR PECHANGA PKWY HURON ST WOLF 42,770 42,346 -424 -0.99% VALLEY RD PECHANGA PKWY WOLF CASINO 39,510 39,228 -282 -0.71% VALLEY RD DRIVE 19 Facts in Support of Findings All though local roadway segments are projected to operate unacceptably under Future Buildout (2035) Conditions, the plus project conditions reduce the average daily trips (ADT) on each roadway and, therefore, do not impact the facilities. VI. Environmental Effects that Remain Significant and Unavoidable After Mitigation In the environmental areas of noise there are instances where potential environmental impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, as discussed below. A. Noise 1. Temporary construction related noise generation Impact Noise -1: Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would generate a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity and would expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial increases in noise levels. These noise levels would result in substantial temporary or periodic ambient noise levels at the following surrounding sensitive land uses: residences southeast of the Project site across Loma Linda Road, residences west of the Project site across the concrete -lined flood channel, residences northeast of the Project site across Temecula Lane, and at the Pala Community Park. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project that reduce the impacts related to noise. The below mitigation measures are required in order to reduce noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors to the extent practicable. Mitigation Measure Noise -1: The project proponent/developer shall ensure that all construction equipment will have properly operating mufflers. Mitigation Measure Noise -2: Noise and ground -borne vibration construction activities whose specific location on the project site may be flexible (e.g., operation of compressors and generators, cement mixing, general truck idling) shall be conducted as far as possible from the nearest noise- and vibration -sensitive land uses. Mitigation Measure Noise -3: Construction activities associated with the proposed project shall, to the extent feasible, be scheduled so as to avoid operating several pieces of equipment simultaneously, which causes high noise levels. Mitigation Measure Noise -4: Barriers such as plywood structures or flexible sound control curtains shall be erected around the Project site to minimize the amount of noise on the surrounding offsite sensitive receptors to the maximum extent feasible during construction. 20 Mitigation Measure Noise -5: The Project proponent/developer shall ensure that signs shall be posted at the construction sites that include permitted construction days and hours, and a contact number for the job site. Mitigation Measure Noise -6: Construction activities shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM Monday through Saturday. Further, no construction activity shall be undertaken on Sundays and nationally recognized holidays (Section 9.20.060 of the City's Municipal Code). Facts in Support of Findings Although the above mitigation measures would reduce the project's construction noise levels to the maximum extent feasible, it is anticipated that the nearest offsite sensitive receptors would continue to experience a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels during project construction. Therefore, the Project's construction noise would be a temporary significant and unavoidable impact on the nearby offsite sensitive receptors. VII. Project Alternatives A. Alternatives Not Evaluated in the EIR An alternative site or location for the project need not be considered when its implementation is "remote and speculative" such as the site being out of the purview of the lead agency or beyond the control of a project applicant. Alternative sites were not selected for evaluation. The CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f)(2) specifies that the key question with alternative sites is "whether any of the significant effects of the Project would be avoided or substantially lessened by putting the Project at another location." While other similar -sized areas of land could be found, based on the known general conditions in the area and the magnitude of the proposal, an alternative site in the area would have the same or similar significant impacts after mitigation as the Project. Given the desire for infill development that matches the surrounding residential communities in density and character, finding another site that meets this goal is impractical. In addition, it would be difficult to still proceed within a reasonably similar time frame for Project completion. The EIR analyzed four other Project alternatives. These three alternatives were considered but ultimately found not to meet the Project's objectives as for the various reasons stated below. A summary of the Project objectives and their relationship to the Project Alternatives can be found in Table 2 at end of the section. B. Alternatives Considered in the EIR 1. Alternative One — No Project Alternative (No Development) a. Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, the project site would be left undeveloped and the proposed residential project would not be built. The site would continue to contain the remnants of a previous structure and several trees as well as ruderal vegetation. In addition, 21 the concrete culvert along the western edge of the project site would remain as is and would not be converted into a bioswale. Unimproved areas along Pechanga Parkway would not be landscaped nor improved in any other way. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative objectives are: Alternative 1 does not meet any of the four project objectives. These • Create a high-quality residential community on the project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market. • Provide a project that is compatible in density and character to the surroundings residential communities. • Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 year old and older population. • Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and the increased availability of for -rent single-family homes The No Project Alternative does not meet any of the Project objectives (per Table 2) because it will lessen residential options for the City's growing population. According to the California Department of Finance, Temecula had a population of 103,092 as of January 1, 2012. During the period from 2007 to 2012, the California Department of Finance estimates that the City population grew by nearly 11%. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) estimates that Temecula will have a projected growth rate of 13.2% to about 113,303 persons by 2021. The Project will create new residential opportunities for these new residents. These opportunities will not exist without the Project. For this reason, the City Council rejects this alternative. 2. Alternative Two — Existing Zoning with Senior Care Facility a. Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, the Project site would be developed with a senior care facility that would include the following components, all of which are permitted uses under the existing professional office (PO) zoning classification (see Section17.08.030 of the Municipal Code): 121 -unit assisted care building; ii. 141 -unit senior apartment building; Two medical office buildings totaling 27,700 square feet; iv. 7,200 -square -foot Alzheimer's facility; and v. 69 independent care housing units with a detached clubhouse and pool 22 This alternative would also include landscaping and the required parking. Total development would involve 380,859 square feet of building area. Additional onsite amenities would include walking paths with benches, garden areas, outdoor activity areas (such as croquet or lawn bowling), large, park -like landscaped areas, water features, and health and personal hygiene services such as barber shops and beauty salons. The site would also be served by bus and shuttle services. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative Alternative two would achieve some of the proposed Project objectives by providing facilities to the City's senior population. Density will remain consistent with current zoning since a Zone Change will not be pursued with this alternative. Project objectives are: • Create a high-quality residential community on the Project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market. • Provide a Project that is compatible in density and character to the surroundings residential communities. • Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 year old and older population. • Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and the increased availability of for -rent single-family homes Populations other than 55 and older would not have an opportunity to benefit from the project if Alternative two is pursued. According to the General Plan the City's median age is 28.8. In addition, the General Plan states that the largest age range in the City is between the ages of 25-44 years old (Figure H-2, City of Temecula General Plan). This age range is expected to rise and will need quality housing options. Therefore, Alternative two would not fully achieve all of the project objectives (per Table 2). The City Council rejects this alternative as infeasible for this reason. 3. Alternative Three — Existing Zoning with Multi -Family housing a. Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, the Project site would be developed with approximately 295 multi -family residential units with 192 triplex units in 64 buildings, 25 five- plex units in five buildings, and 78 six-plex units in 13 buildings. Ten percent of these units (approximately 30 units) would be reserved for lower-income housing. In addition, this alternative would include a linear park system that would run north -south through the middle of the project with several east -west spurs. Water quality basins would be included along the northern edge of the property to accommodate increased stormwater runoff from the project site. 23 b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative Alternative three would achieve some of the proposed project objectives. Density will remain consistent with current zoning since a Zone Change will not be pursued with this alternative. The same high quality units will be required for the project. Finally, the housing will remain as a for rent product. Project objectives are: • Create a high-quality residential community on the project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market. • Provide a project that is compatible in density and character to the surroundings residential communities. • Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 year old and older population. • Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and the increased availability of for -rent single-family homes According to the California Department of Finance, Temecula had a population of 103,092 as of January 1, 2012. The U.S. Census Bureau has indicated in their 2010 Census 23.7 percent of Temecula residents are 50 and older. Alternative three will not allow opportunities for residents that can qualify age restricted housing. Therefore, Alternative three would not fully achieve all of the project objectives (per Table 2). The City Council rejects this alternative as infeasible for this reason. 4. Alternative Four — Reduced Project Alternative a. Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, a residential project would be developed that would include similar components as the proposed project, but would involve a smaller version. Specifically, the Project would include development of approximately 200 multi -family units (a reduction 125 units when compared to the Project) with approximately 10 percent of these units reserved for affordable housing. This alternative would not include lots for senior single-family homes, but would provide site amenities such as a clubhouse with a swimming pool. Unimproved areas along Pechanga Parkway would remain unimproved with no landscaping. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative Alternative four would achieve some of the proposed project objectives. Density will remain consistent with current zoning since a Zone Change will not be pursued with this alternative. The same high quality units will be required for the project. Project objectives are: 24 • Create a high-quality residential community on the project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market. • Provide a Project that is compatible in density and character to the surroundings residential communities. • Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 year old and older population. • Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and the increased availability of for -rent single- family homes The City desires to provide single-family housing opportunities for the region's 55 and old population. This desire has also been expressed as a project objective. This alternative does not allow housing opportunities for the City's 55 and older population. For this reason, the City Council rejects this alternative. TABLE 2 ABILITY OF ALTERNATIVES TO MEET PROJECT OBJECTIVES Project Objectives Alt. 1: No Project Alternative (No Development) Alt. 2: Existing Zoning with Senior Care Facility AIt.3: Existing Zoning with Multi -Family Housing Alt. 4: Reduced Project Alternative Create a high-quality residential community on the project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market. Provide a project that is compatible in density and character to the surrounding residential communities. Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 and older population. No No No No Yes Yes 25 Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and the increased availability of for -rent single-family homes. No No Yes No C. Environmentally Superior Alternative An EIR must identify the environmentally superior alternative. The No Project Alternative (No Development) would be environmentally superior to the proposed project based on the minimization or avoidance of physical environmental impacts. However, the No Project Alternative (No Development) does not meet any of the Project objectives. In addition, CEQA Guidelines (Section 15126.6(c)) require that, if the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project Alternative (No Development), the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives. A summary comparison of the potential impacts associated with the alternatives and the proposed Project is provided in Table 3. Based on this comparison, Alternative four (Reduced Project Alternative) is the environmentally superior alternative. However, Alternative four would not fully achieve all of the project objectives. It would not provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 and older population, nor would it provide increased availability of for -rent single-family homes. In addition, with the exception of construction noise, all impacts related to Alternative four and the proposed project could be reduced to less than significant impacts with the implementation of fairly standard mitigation measures; the significant and unavoidable impacts related to construction noise that would occur with the proposed project would occur with any development alternative at the project site. TABLE 3 SUMMARY COMPARISON OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVE IMPACTSa Potential Project Impacts Alt. 1: No Project Alternative (No Development) Alt. 2: Existing Zoning with Senior Care Facility Alt.3: Existing Zoning with Multi - Family Housing Alt. 4: Reduced Project Alternative Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Global Warming/Climate Reduced Reduced Reduced Reduced Similar Similar Reduced Similar Reduced Reduced 26 Similar Similar Similar Similar Similar Reduced Similar Similar Similar Reduced Change Hazards and Reduced Similar Similar Similar Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Reduced Similar Similar Similar Quality Land Use Reduced Similar Similar Similar Noise Reduced Reduced Similar Reduced Population and Housing Reduced Reduced Reduced Reduced Public Services Reduced Reduced Reduced Reduced Traffic and Circulation Reduced Reduced Similar Reduced Utilities Reduced Similar Similar Reduced D. The Project As Proposed 1. Summary of Project The Project is described in detail in the EIR. 2. Reasons for Selecting Project as Proposed The City Council has carefully reviewed the attributes and environmental impacts of all the alternatives analyzed in the Final EIR and has compared them with those of the proposed Project. The City Council finds that each of the alternatives is infeasible for various economic, social, or other reasons set forth above. The City Council further finds that the Project as proposed is the best combination of features to serve the interest of the public and achieve the project goals. More specifically, the Project as proposed strikes a proper balance of providing high-quality residential development that services different age populations. that emphasizes a mixed-use environment in which residents benefit from nearby shopping and employment opportunities. This proposed project promotes sound environmental policies as discussed in detail in the EIR. For all of these reasons, the City Council selects the Project as proposed. 27 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The following Statement of Overriding Considerations is made in connection with the proposed approval of the Bella Linda Residential Project (the "Project"). CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance the economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve a project. If the benefits of the Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects may be considered acceptable. CEQA requires the agency to provide written findings supporting the specific reasons for considering a project acceptable when significant impacts are unavoidable. Such reasons must be based on substantial evidence in the EIR or elsewhere in the administrative record. The reasons for proceeding with this Project despite the adverse environmental impacts that may result are provided in this Statement of Overriding Considerations. The City Council finds that the economic, social and other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant and unavoidable impacts to noise generated by temporary construction activities. In making this finding, the City Council has balanced the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those adverse impacts. The City Council finds that each one of the following benefits of the Project, independent of the other benefits, would warrant approval of the Project notwithstanding the unavoidable environmental impacts of the Project. A. The City Council finds that all feasible mitigation measures have been imposed to either lessen Project impacts to less than significant or to the extent feasible, and furthermore, that alternatives to the Project are infeasible because they generally have similar impacts, or they do not provide the benefits of the Project, or are otherwise socially or economically infeasible as fully described in the Statement of Facts and Findings. B. The proposed Project will provide off-site improvements. Specifically, the Project applicant has agreed to provide landscaping north of the project site. This area is located at the beginning at the western most portion of the project site and extending north along Pechanga Parkway for approximately 1,050 feet. This area is currently vacant. The placement of landscaping along this stretch of road will beautify the area. C. The proposed Project area includes the concrete culvert and access road located off-site adjacent to the proposed single family lots. The culvert and access road will be replaced with a fully landscaped bio-swale and trail connection for residents of the project and surrounding communities. D. The proposed Project will create additional housing units that will provide residential opportunities for all age populations in the City. Overall available housing stock in the City will be increased. The City Council finds that the foregoing benefits provided through approval of the Project outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts. The City Council further finds that each of the Project benefits discussed above outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the Final EIR and therefore finds those impacts to be acceptable. The City Council further finds that each of the benefits listed above, standing alone, is sufficient justification for the City Council to override these unavoidable environmental impacts. C-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Impact Monitoring Phase Enforcement Agency Responsible Monitoring Agency Action Indicating Compliance Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remarks Air Quality Mitigation Measure Air -1: All construction equipment used onsite during Construction project construction shall meet, at a minimum, EPA Tier 11 certification requirements. As an alternative, the applicant may opt to apply other available technologies to the construction equipment that would achieve at least a 15 percent reduction in NOx emissions than the use of Tier II construction equipment. Where alternatives to EPA Tier II are chosen for the proposed project, the applicant shall be required to show evidence to the City that a 15 percent reduction in NOx emissions would be achieved. Biological Resources Mitigation Measure Bio -1: Impacts to raptors and other migratory birds shall be avoided by the implementation of one of the following measures: • All construction and ground disturbing activities shall take place outside of the raptor breeding season (February 1 -August 30). • If construction and ground disturbing activities are necessary during the breeding season (February 1 -August 30), a focused survey for active nests of raptors and migratory birds shall be conducted by a biologist (a person possessing a bachelors in science with a minimum of one year nest survey experience performing raptor surveys). The survey shall occur a maximum of 14 days prior to any construction or ground -disturbing activities. If active nest(s) (with eggs or fledglings) are identified within the project site, (CDFG for state listed species, species of special concern, and MSHCP covered species; USFWS for birds covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and listed species) they shall not be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged (matured to a state that they can leave the nest on their own). A 500 -foot construction setback from any active nesting location shall be adhered to in order to avoid disturbance of the nest until the young have fledged or the nest has failed, as determined by a qualified biologist. If no active nests are identified, construction may commence. Pre -Construction / Construction City of Temecula City of Temecula Building Official or other Designee City of Temecula City of Temecula Qualified Biologist Issuance of Grading Permit and field verification and sign -off by City of Temecula Field verification and sign -off by City of Temecula Bella Linda Residential Project 1 ESA / 120198 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program March 2013 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (continued) Mitigation Measure Bio -2: The entire project site shall be surveyed by a Pre -Construction City of Temecula City of Temecula Field verification qualified biologist (i.e., approved by CDFG) using CDFG approved burrowing Qualified and sign -off by owl survey protocols a maximum of 30 days prior to construction to determine Biologist City of Temecula presence/absence of burrowing owl (CDFG, 2012). If no burrowing owls are identified on the site during these pre -construction surveys, no additional mitigation is necessary and construction can commence. If burrowing owl(s) are found onsite, CDFG, the City, and RCA will be notified. The following species-specific mitigation actions would be required if burrowing owls are found: • Sheltering in place of nesting owls until nest fledges or fails, as determined by a qualified biologist (a Bachelor's of Science degree or equivalent experience and a minimum of one year of previous burrowing owl monitoring experience). • Preparing and implementing an active translocation plan, if appropriate and approved, and identifying a receptor site for the owl(s) (per WRC MSHCP and CDFG). Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure Cultural -1 — Retention of a Qualified Archaeologist: Pre -Construction City of Temecula City of Temecula Field verification Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground- / Construction Qualified and sign -off by disturbing activity, the applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined Archaeologist City of Temecula as an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (Department of the Interior, 2012) to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources (Mitigation Measures Cultural -2, -3 and -5). Mitigation Measure Cultural -2 — Cultural Resources Training: The qualified archeologist, or an archaeologist working under the direction of the qualified archaeologist, along with a representative designated by the Pechanga Tribe, shall conduct pre -construction cultural resources worker sensitivity training to inform construction personnel of the types of cultural resources that may be encountered, and to bring awareness to personnel of actions to be taken in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The applicant shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and shall retain documentation demonstrating attendance. Bella Linda Residential Project 2 ESA / 120198 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program March 2013 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (continued) Mitigation Measure Cultural -3 — Archaeological Monitoring: Prior to the start of ground- disturbing activities, the qualified archaeologist shall designate an archaeological monitor to observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The archaeological monitor shall keep daily Togs. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring activities, which shall be submitted to the City, Pechanga Tribe, and to the Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside. Mitigation Measure Cultural -4 — Native American Monitoring: At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Pechanga Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City and the Pechanga Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement (Agreement). The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and all ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. A minimum of 30 days prior to issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground -disturbing activity, a Native American monitor from the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the applicant to monitor all ground - disturbing activities Including, but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, as specified in the Agreement. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more locations, additional Native American monitors may be required. (Continued) (Continued) (Continued) (Continued) Bella Linda Residential Protect 3 ESA / 120198 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program March 2013 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (continued) Mitigation Measure Cultural -5 — Unanticipated Archaeological Resources (Continued) Discoveries: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are made during ground -disturbing activities, the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the City Planning Director for decision. The City Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the CEQA with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. Mitigation Measure Cultural -6 — Curation: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are recovered as a result of project implementation to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition as outlined in the Agreement (Mitigation Measure Cultural -4). Mitigation Measure Cultural -7 — Discovery of Sacred Sites: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. Mitigation Measure Cultural -8 — Paleontological Resources Training: Prior to construction, a training session on the recognition of the types of paleontological resources that could be encountered within the project area and the procedures to be followed if they are found shall be presented to project construction personnel by a qualified cultural resources professional. This training may be conducted concurrently with the cultural resources training required in Mitigation Measure Cultural -2. (Continued) (Continued) (Continued) Bella Linda Residential Project 4 ESA/120198 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program March 2013 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (continued) Mitigation Measure Cultural -9 — Paleontological Resources Monitoring: During construction, should excavations be greater than ten feet in depth, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained and shall designate a paleontological monitor to observe the sediments. Should these sediments appear to have a greater potential for fossils, paleontological monitoring of ground disturbing activities below ten feet shall commence until such a time as.the excavation of these sediments has ceased, or upon determination by the qualified paleontologist that the likelihood of encountering paleontological resources is unlikely. Mitigation Measure Cultural -10 — Unanticipated Paleontological Resources Discoveries: If construction or other project personnel discover any potential fossils during construction, or project operations and maintenance, regardless of the depth of work, work within 100 feet of the discovery location should cease and a qualified paleontologist should be called to further assess the discovery and make further recommendations as necessary. Mitigation Measure Cultural -11 — Human Remains Discoveries: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Califomia Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and the Agreement described in Mitigation Measure Cultural -4. Bella Unda Residential Project 5 ESA / 120198 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program March 2013 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (continued) Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure Haz-1: The use of construction best management practices shall be implemented as part of construction to minimize the potential negative effects of accidental release of hazardous materials to groundwater and soils. These shall include the following: • Follow manufacturer's recommendations on use, storage and disposal of chemical products used in construction; • Avoid overtopping construction equipment fuel gas tanks; • During routine maintenance of construction equipment, properly contain and remove grease and oils; and • Properly dispose of discarded containers of fuels and other chemicals in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and local and state regulations. Noise Mitigation Measure Noise -1: The project proponent/developer shall ensure that all construction equipment will have properly operating mufflers. Mitigation Measure Noise -2: Noise and groundbome vibration construction activities whose specific location on the project site may be flexible (e.g., operation of compressors and generators, cement mixing, general truck idling) shall be conducted as far as possible from the nearest noise- and vibration - sensitive land uses. Mitigation Measure Noise -3: Construction activities associated with the proposed project shall, to the extent feasible, be scheduled so as to avoid operating several pieces of equipment simultaneously, which causes high noise levels. Pre -Construction City of Temecula / Construction Pre -Construction City of Temecula / Construction City of Temecula Building Official or other Designee City of Temecula Building Official or other Designee Issuance of Grading Permit and field verification and sign -off by City of Temecula Issuance of Grading Permit and field verification and sign -off by City of Temecula Bella Linda Residential Project 6 ESA / 120198 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program March 2013 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (continued) Mitigation Measure Noise -4: Barriers such as plywood structures or flexible sound control curtains shall be erected around the project site to minimize the amount of noise on the surrounding offsite sensitive receptors to the maximum extent feasible during construction. Mitigation Measure Noise -5: The project proponent/developer shall ensure that signs shall be posted at the construction sites that include permitted construction days and hours, and a contact number for the job site. Mitigation Measure Noise -6: Construction activities shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM Monday through Saturday. Further, no construction activity shall be undertaken on Sundays and nationally recognized holidays (Section 9.20.060 of the City's Municipal Code). Mitigation Measure Noise -7: The operation of construction equipment that generates high levels of vibration, such as large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills, shall be prohibited within 45 feet of existing nearby residential structures during construction of the proposed project. Instead, small rubber - tired bulldozers shall be used within this area during grading and excavation operations. The use of small rubber -tired bulldozers would result in vibration levels of 0.002 PPV and 57 VdB at the residences to the west of the project site, which would not exceed the FTA's vibration criteria for building damage and human annoyance. Mitigation Measure Noise -8: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that all new HVAC or mechanical equipment associated with the proposed project be designed with adequate shielding (e.g., via rooftop parapet or enclosure) or noise muffling devices to ensure that noise levels would not exceed the ambient noise level on the premises of other occupied residential properties located offsite by more than five decibels. Mitigation Measure Noise -9: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that all exterior windows associated with the proposed residential uses at the project site shall be constructed to provide a sufficient amount of sound Insulation to ensure that interior noise levels would be below an Ldn or CNEL of 45 dB in any habitable room. Bella Linda Residential Project 7 ESA/ 120198 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program March 2013 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (continued) Transportation and Traffic Mitigation Measure Circ -1: The City shall provide for timing optimization at Pre -Construction City of Temecula City of Temecula Issuance of a the following locations, funded by the project proponent/developer's fair share Engineer or Certificate of contribution, as indicated: other Designee Occupancy • Intersection of 1-15 SB Ramps and Temecula Parkway — AM and PM Peak Hour o Signal timing optimization: Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix 0 of the TIA (see Appendix H of the Draft EIR). • Improved AM operations to LOS D, delay of 42.1 seconds. Improved PM operations to LOS D, delay of 52.8 seconds. • Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 15%. • Intersection of Wolf Valley Road at Pechanga Parkway — PM Peak Hour o Signal timing optimization: Cycle lengths were changed from 90 seconds to 150 seconds in the PM peak hour. Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix 0 of the TIA (see Appendix H of the Draft EIR). • Improved PM operations to LOS D, delay of 40.6 seconds. Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 12%. Bella Linda Residential Protect 8 ESA/ 120198 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program March 2013 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (continued) Mitigation Measure Circ -2: The following improvements shall be made by the City of Temecula, and funded by the project proponent/developer's fair share contribution, as indicated: • At the intersection of 1-15 NB Ramps and Temecula Parkway — AM Peak Hour o Restripe westbound third through lane to shared through - right turn lane. o Signal timing optimization: Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix 0 of the TIA (see Appendix H of the Draft EIR). • Improved AM operations to LOS C, delay of 28.4 seconds. • Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 4%. • This intersection is within Caltrans jurisdiction and therefore any proposed mitigation measures require Caltrans approval. • At the intersection of Pechanga Parkway at Rainbow Canyon Road — PM Peak Hour o Change eastbound right turn permissive phase overlap. o Signal timing optimization: Cycle lengths were changed from 90 seconds to 110 seconds in the PM peak hour. Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix 0 of the TIA (see Appendix H of the Draft EIR). • Improved PM operations to LOS C, delay of 28.9 seconds. • Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure 9%. Bella Linda Residential Project 9 ESA / 120198 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program March 2013 To the City of Temecula, The Planning Department, and Coyne Development, I respectfully submit the following concerns regarding the proposed Bella Linda project. These are in addition to my concerns stated in my previous letter to you on March 20, 2013. Under Planning Application # PA11-0277 page 8 and PA11-0275 page 19: "Prior to Issuance of Grading Permt(s)" PW -27 and PW 10 respectively. "In the event the Developer is not able to record the easement for each effected property, the Developer shall submit a new Development Plan". We have not received any information from Coyne Development regarding "New Plan Options" pertaining to our Private Property Easements. This is of great concern to all of us listed on the previously submitted petition, opposing any and all changes to our easements. During the 3-20-13 meeting Coyne Development, I believe, stated they planned on tearing out the existing sidewalks and replacing them with their meandering paths. These sidewalks are worth a lot of money spent to engineer and build them. They are "handicap accessible". They are also invaluable to those families out with their children in strollers. I strongly oppose any removal of existing sidewalks. There are many people who require smooth surfaces in order to walk safely. These sidewalks are an asset to our city. I have concerns regarding the "age restricted" housing Coyne proposes to meet Planning criteria. Seniors buying these homes undoubtedly plan on staying awhile. As they age some will become less ambulatory and therefore have special needs. Are these homes going to provide for these needs? Are they going to be `handicap accessible"? Will there be room for specially equipped vans for those who need them? Additionally, are any of the proposed apartments "handicap accessible"???? The proposed senior homes are close to a very noisy park, unless potential buyers show up on tournament days or loud tennis and basketball nights they will be unable to ascertain the true impact this will have. Has Coyne given any thought to erecting a sound wall along Canterfield and Temecula Lane for a reasonable distance to mitigate this impact on potential senior buyers? Finally, the "alleged" criminals being chased around Temecula Creek by police helicopters every year, invariably make for Pala Community Park or any other potential hiding place. I hope Coyne Development takes this into account when providing security for all its potential residents, ESPECIALLY THE SENIORS! Please keep our easement locked and the bad guys out! Thank you, Mrs. Lewis 4-3-2013 6, Ile 'The- 17 /6.4. &tic, t 1 1 t'E COL 8. cov &Lc ae tie le) po 1 Aoa. ic 10 a 1 -i -end yoor too al- e • 13e Cat/ -5eJ t,00,- n,e311.4-5 rNe, (6110 L CPbe,e.y - . Ckett, A- k e pc;/ vlik -I {u b kc- C1 ) • k uct e Q.C't.;) i)tisc ct;f)e.rne:\ 1(1 ( f -pd (-0 3 1 ci be... h.eld Ltck ie. • 0-'6"4 y ep,,,,a -To P 1.4-16i. (4, n the O(..,lis(9ret 1(q S' I 9 it'u) (-It Ict 1 e-Yrit cot& (AA 3 / / -- I 5 kAL C PETITION Page 1 of 2 To the City of Temecula, the Department of Planning, and Coyne Development, We, the undersigned, respectfully oppose/now oppose any and all changes to the easement on our private property at Muirfield Drive in Temecula, California. This includes, but is not limited to: Public access, trail, pathway, removal or changes to the concrete culvert, adding lighting, adding greenery, a block wall on our private property, and any changes to the gates at either end of our private�property. t• es s , ct, akzrkv.c e -Z (i9 `jS',4 ftwi: ‘d r.'C LeSc,.e 41�JMtipL . l ., C a _ FA-ZI, Lt�% c. a isygt96) /V1ujr'o-14..d� P‹d 'T ,oe l< Amos . y17 V %71 kirkJiJ fl c-BAIA1C. 0tiJ 1/l!q/02 i1 ak..C1:eld pt.!. 'Nona 1_61C,r L/d/ g 6 y Pli,,Itzpild 3 P Pic kikApse 1 t CI 3&' IX_ C:tiY`tYin 4&tI' ( 1 11 11 11/1i.cvln`Q-e,V 12..i`4{ q n*t 11 • y, 7&, IV e..i �i ie Id be. /Ely- (e'f' G L a u h SS" . 111e�irI ' id �� (> C <<,6. f rdie„-r- Lec4 C{tO y y 7�� 4r// „Q d Di ki ri yg(8L4tJ Munefield br. Do_ pn _.vg. �luanc\ ✓, 9G;i' el (S , ' • = on bckraa $ r4 f W . }lo ut PETITi0.1- Page 2ofE 2 = City of - l t-- ai Lf i i ltl g-iCi.1t: _!:`s' and C`�yris To the i,St,� :. �.iLit;ti"t's�i., q-�S`. i,i :�z -p: �-- � We, the undersigned, respectfully oppose/now oppose any and ail changes to the easement on our private property at Muirfield Drive in Temecula, California. This includes, but is not limited to: Public access, trail, pathway, removal or changes to the concrete culvert, adding lighting, adding greenery, a block wall on our private property, and any changes to the gates at either end of our private property. Iiifurfifi-o-ed Dr R.06 Liietkit4-1 r 44' March 6, 2013 City Planning Director City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 Dear Sirs: I am writing to you regarding the proposed Bella Linda Development at Loma Linda and Pechanga Parkway. I have met with project representative Joanne Rodriguez to discuss project details. I also attended the developer open houses and a meeting at city hall. Respectfully, I have concerns about changes to the drainage easement on my property, which niy husband and I paid for. I do not consent to any changes to my easement for the following reasons: 1) The current storm drain meets FEMA requirement for my Zone X status regarding flood control. I have not heard from FEMA authorizing changes to the flood control channel. Should changes take place, my lender could very likely require me to pay flood insurance. This is unacceptable to me. 2) This is private property, has been private property since before my house was built, and continues to be private property. 3) A private company, Coyne Development has proposed to pay for thousands of feet of a brick wall on neighboring private properties. Why don't they put the wall on their own property? 4) I have no way of knowing how your proposed improvement to the easement is going to affect my property value and therefore, my property tax. 5) The proposed vegetation will require water and maintenance. I would like to know who is paying for this item. 6) I would also like the easement area to continue to be gated at both ends, because it is private property. According to the Megan's Law Convicted Sex Offender Database, there are approximately 25 convicted sex offenders in this zip code. Also, Obama is releasing thousands of convicted criminals from jails all over the country. My personal safety, and the safety of the children on my street is of great concern to me. 7) If Coyne wants a walking trail, I would prefer it to be on their property. 8) Regarding proposed changes to the existing storm drain/culvert, to create a bioswale, I do not agree that there is significant benefit to justify changes. Very near our property, there are three major bioswales in the immediate vicinity, Wolf Creek, Temecula Creek, and Pechanga Creek. I do not see the need to alter private property that could result in us homeowners having to pay flood insurance or increased homeowner's insurance. . 9) No one should use this property for public use. No one should have access to it, so its appearance is not a valid reason to alter private property (landscape it). 10) If Coyne needs a bioswale I welcome them to build one on their own property, and not on someone else's private property. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on these proposed projects involving my private property. CALIFORNIA FISH F< wu-ouIE State of California — Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Inland Deserts Region 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220 Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 484-0459 www.wildlife.ca.gov January 15, 2013 Mr. Eric Stone City of Temecula PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director JAN 2, <,11/3 Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bella Linda Residential Project City of Temecula, County of Riverside State Clearinghouse No. 2012041038 Dear Mr. Stone: The Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) appreciates this opportunity to comment on Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Bella Linda Residential Project (Project), State Clearinghouse No. 2012041038. The Department is responding as a Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources (Fish and Wildlife Code sections §711.7 and §1802 and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) section §15386) and as a Responsible Agency regarding any discretionary actions (CEQA Guidelines section §15381), such as a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (section §1600 et seq.) and/or a California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Permit for the Incidental Take (ITP) of Endangered, Threatened and /or Candidate species (Fish and Wildlife Code Sections 2080 and 2080.1). Project Description The Project consists of the development of a two-phase residential project on 23.61 acres. The first phase is for the construction of 325 apartment units totaling 462,422 square feet. The construction consists of 13 three story buildings and 10 two-story townhome buildings ranging from 28-39 feet in height. Phase II involves the creation of 49 senior single-family units. A concrete -lined flood control channel, tributary to Temecula Creek, is located along the western boundary and is proposed to be converted to a bioswale. The Project is located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside and is bounded by residential development to the west, east, and south and a community park to the northeast. The Wolf Creek planned community is immediately south of the Project and the Pechanga Resort and Casino is 1/2 mile south of the Project. The Project site is located within the Santa Margarita Watershed. Conserving California's WifdTfe Since 1870 Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bella Linda Residential Project City of Temecula, County of Riverside State Clearinghouse No. 2012041038 Page 2 of 6 The site is completely enclosed by chain-link fencing and has been used for sod farming, horse -keeping and utility vehicle storage. The site does not abut or encroach upon Temecula Creek. Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) The Department is responsible for ensuring appropriate conservation of fish and wildlife resources including rare, threatened, and endangered plant and animal species, pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act, and administers the Natural Community Conservation Plan Program (NCCP). On June 22, 2004, the Department issued Natural Community Conservation Plan Approval and Take Authorization for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) per Section §2800, et seq., of the California Fish and Wildlife Code. The MSHCP establishes a multiple species conservation program to minimize and mitigate habitat Toss and the incidental take of covered species in association with activities covered under the permit. The Project is located within the Southwest Area Plan of the MSHCP and is subject to the provisions and policies of the MSHCP. The City of Temecula is signatory to the Implementing Agreement and is a Permittee of the MSHCP. Participants in the MSHCP are issued take authorization for covered species. In order to be considered a covered activity, Permittees must demonstrate that proposed actions are consistent with the MSHCP and its associated Implementing Agreement. Compliance with approved habitat plans, such as the MSHCP, is discussed in CEQA. Section 15125(d) of the Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act requires that an environmental impact report (EIR) discuss any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable general plans and regional plans, including habitat conservation plans and natural community conservation plans. The proposed project area is located within Subunit 2 of the Southwest Area Plan which includes Criteria Cells 7445 and 7446. Other MSHCP policies and procedures apply to the proposed project such as the Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools policy (MSHCP section 6.1.2 pp 6-20; "Riparian/Riverine and Vernal Pool Policy"), Fuels Management (MSHCP section 6.4, pp 6-72) and the Guidelines Pertaining to the Urban Wildlands Interface (MSHCP section 6.1.4, pp 6-42). The Regional Conservation Authority of the MSHCP conducted a Joint Project Review (RCAJPR 12-02-23-01) of the Proposed Project. The RCA's Consistency Conclusion is that the project is consistent with both the Criteria and Other Plan requirements. The Area Plan Criteria calls for conservation in the northern portion of the Criteria Cells. The Proposed Project is not located in the northern part of Criteria Cells 7445 and 7446, does not encroach upon proposed conservation in Temecula Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bella Linda Residential Project City of Temecula, County of Riverside State Clearinghouse No. 2012041038 Page 3 of 6 Creek, is not suitable for inclusion in Constrained Linkage 14, and will not impact a future wildlife corridor. Biological Resources and Impacts Biological surveys conducted on the site found many species that were present or had a high or medium potential for occurrence. These species include: coastal western whiptail (Cnemidophorus tigris multiscutatus), northern red diamond rattlesnake (Crotalus ruber ruber), red-tailed hawk (Buten jamaicensis), killdeer (Charadrius vociferous), white-tailed kite (Elan us leucurus), kestrel (Falco spawerius), and coyote (Canis latrans). The site was surveyed for burrowing owl, vernal pools and fairy shrimp but none were found. No special plant species were found on site. The MSHCP Planning Species for Subunit 2: Temecula and Pechanga Creeks include: Cooper's hawk (Accipitercooper), downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), loggerhead shrike (Lanius /udovicianus), southwestern vvillow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor), white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus), yellow -breasted chat (lcteria virens), yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia brewsten), bobcat (Fells rufus), Los Angeles pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris brevinasus), mountain lion (Felix concolor) and western pond turtle (Clemmys marmorata). The Subunit 2 biological issues and considerations consist of: maintaining habitat connectivity within Murrieta Creek, Temecula Creek and Pechanga Creek for wildlife movement; maintain core and linkage habitat for bobcat; maintain the area of Murrieta Creek at the confluence of Pechanga Creek, Temecula Creek and the Santa Margarita River for mountain lion linkage, and maintain the core area for western pond turtle. Proposed mitigation Mitigation measures are delineated in the RCAJPR 12-02-23-01. These measures include: controlling on-site runoff, utilizing Best Management Practice measures for water quality, ensuring that the use of toxic substances does not enter the nearby conservation areas, implement noise and night lighting measures, and not include invasive species in its landscape plan. Lake and Streambed Alteration Program The RCA found that the Proposed Project is consistent with Section 6.1.2, Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools. However, the Department's criteria for determining the presence of jurisdictional waters are more comprehensive than the WRMSHCP criteria in Section 6.1.2. The project requires a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement Notification if the Department determines that the site contain jurisdictional waters of the State. Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bella Linda Residential Project City of Temecula, County of Riverside State Clearinghouse No. 2012041038 Page 4 of 6 The Department recommends submitting a notification early on, since modification of the proposed project may be required to avoid or reduce impacts to fish and wildlife resources. To obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement notification package, please go to http://www.dfq.ca.gov/habcon/1600/forms.html. A jurisdictional delineation was conducted for this project in 2012 but not included with the CEQA document. Information on page 3.2-13 of the DEIR states that there are no jurisdictional aquatic resources on the site. However, page 3.2-25 of the DEIR states that approval would be required by the Army Corps of Engineers, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the State Department of Fish and Wildlife for the removal of a concrete -lined channel and replacement with a bioswale. The Department recommends that the CEQA document is revised to clarify impacts to State jurisdictional waters and include the 2012 jurisdictional delineation. The Department opposes the elimination of ephemeral, intermittent and perennial stream channels, lakes and their associated habitats. The Department recommends avoiding the stream and riparian habitat to the greatest extent possible. Any unavoidable impacts need to be compensated with the creation and/or restoration of in-kind habitat either on-site or off-site at a minimum 3:1 replacement -to -impact ratio, depending on the impacts and proposed mitigation. Additional mitigation requirements through the Department's Streambed Alteration Agreement process may be required depending on the quality of habitat impacted, proposed mitigation, project design, and other factors. The following information will be required for the processing of a Streambed Alteration Agreement and the Department recommends incorporating this information to avoid subsequent CEQA documentation and project delays: 1) Delineation of lakes, streams, and associated habitat that will be temporarily and/or permanently impacted by the proposed project (include an estimate of impact to each habitat type); 2) Discussion of avoidance measures to reduce project impacts; and, 3) Discussion of potential mitigation measures required to reduce the project impacts to a level of insignificance. Please refer to section 5370 of the CEQA guidelines for the definition of mitigation If the CEQA documents do not fully identify potential impacts to lakes, streams, and associated resources and provide adequate avoidance, mitigation, monitoring, funding sources, a habitat management plan and reporting commitments, additional CEQA documentation will be required prior to execution (signing) of the Agreement. In the absence of an impacts analysis and mitigation measures to offset those impacts in the CEQA document, the Department believes that it cannot fulfill its obligations as a Trustee and Responsible Agency for fish and wildlife resources. In order to avoid delays or repetition of the CEQA process, potential impacts to a stream or lake, as well as Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bella Linda Residential Project City of Temecula, County of Riverside State Clearinghouse No. 2012041038 Page 5 of 6 avoidance and mitigation measures need to be discussed within this CEQA document. Permit negotiations conducted after and outside of the CEQA process are not CEQA- compliant because they deprive the public and agencies of their right to know what project impacts are and how they are being mitigated (CEQA Section 15002). We recommend that the Final EIR state that future CEQA processing may be required to address future project impacts and mitigation if an impacts analysis and mitigation measures are not provided in the Final EIR and that Department comments be addressed in the Final EIR. Department Concerns The Department's concerns center on the Department's role as a responsible agency under CEQA for the issuance of 1600 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreements. The department has the following recommendations: 1. The analysis in the su,bSequent CEQA document should satisfy the requirements of the Department's Lake and Streambed Alteration Program and CESA (if deemed necessary); 2. The subsequent CEQA Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) or CEQA Response to Comments (RTC) document should include an impact analysis and mitigation measures (proposed bioswale) for the Toss of State jurisdictional waters that include but are not limited to a revegetation plan, maintenance plan, a 5 -year monitoring plan and funding to implement the plan; and, 3. The subsequent CEQA FEIR or RTC document should contain the jurisdictional delineation prepared by consultants in 2012. In summary, the Department believes that the DER is inadequate in describing and analyzing the full impacts of the project scope, including but not limited to describing and analyzing impacts to jurisdictional waters. The Department recommends that the CEQA document be revised to address these deficiencies. Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bella Linda Residential Project City of Temecula, County of Riverside State Clearinghouse No. 2012041038 Page 6 of 6 We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the referenced DEIR. If you should have any questions pertaining to these comments, please contact Robin Maloney- Rames, Environmental Scientist, at (909)980-3818. Sincerely, Senior Envirofhmental Scientist STA IF_ OF,Cpl,LJ ORMA-01JSJNES.Sr,TKAPJ,4S •• VON AND HOUSINGAGF:NQY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 PLANNING 464 WEST 4th STREET, 6`h Floor MS 725 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400 PHONE (909) 383-4557 FAX (909) 383-5936 TTY (909) 383-6300 January 31, 2013 Eric Jones Assistant Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 try.. / 204 Subject: Bella Linda Development Plan (SR -79 PM 18.27) Mr. Jones, UJND GJ3ROWN Jr Governor Flex your power' Be energy efcieni! We have completed our review for the Bella Linda General Plan Amendment. The project is surrounded by Pechanga Parkway on the west, Loma Linda Road on the south, Temecula Lane on the east and a drainage channel and single family residential to the north. Please refer to our comment letter dated April 30, 2012 As the owner and operator of the State Highway System (SHS), it is our responsibility to coordinate and consult with local jurisdictions when proposed development may impact our facilities. As the responsible agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), it is also our responsibility to make recommendations to offset associated impacts with the proposed project. Although the project is under the jurisdiction of the City of Temecula due to the Project's potential impact to State facilities it is also subject to the policies and regulations that govern the SHS. We appreciate the opportunity to offer comments concerning this project. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Talvin Dennis at (909) 383-6908 or myself at (909) 383-4557 for assistance. Sincerely, ,_— DANIEL KOPULSKY Office Chief Community Planning/IGR CEQA G"" "Caimans nnproves mobility across California" STATE O1 CALIFORNIA; - NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 915 CAPITOL MALL, ROOM 364 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 (916) 653-6251 Fax (916) 657-5390 Web Site www.nahc.ca.gov de_nehc a pecbell.nel December 14, 2012 • ;. ICY. Mr. Eric Jones, Assistant Planner City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Edmu{►d,Q,BrownJr. ovorn_or Re: SCH#2012041038 CEQA Notice of Completion ; draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)for the "Bella Linda General Plan Amendment Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay(PA11-0276) Tentative Tract Map PA11-0277KDevelopment Plan (_PA11-0275)f located in the City of Temecula: Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Jones: The California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) is the State of California 'trustee agency' for the preservation and protection of Native American cultural resources pursuant to Califomia Public Resources Code §21070 and affirmed by the Third Appellate Court in the case of EPIC v. Johnson (1985: 170 Cal App. 3`d 604). This letter includes state and federal statutes relating to Native American historic properties or resources of religious and cultural significance to American Indian tribes and interested Native American individuals as 'consulting parties' under both state and federal law. State law also addresses the freedom of Native American Religious Expression in Public Resources Code §5097.9. This project is also subject to California Government Code Section 65352.3, et seq. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA — CA Public Resources Code 21000-21177, amendment s effective 3/18/2010) requires that any project that causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource, that includes archaeological resources, is a 'significant effect' requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) per the CEQA Guidelines defines a significant impact on the environment as 'a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of physical conditions within an area affected by the proposed project, including ...objects of historic or aesthetic significance." In order to comply with this provision, the lead agency is required to assess whether the project will have an adverse impact on these resources within the 'area of potential effect (APE), and if so, to mitigate that effect. The NAHC advises the Lead Agency to request a Sacred Lands File search of the NAHC if one has not been done for the 'area of potential effect' or APE previously. The NAHC "Sacred Sites,' as defined by the Native American Heritage Commission and the California Legislature in Califomia Public Resources Code §§5097.94(a) and 5097.96. Items in the NAHC Sacred Lands Inventory are confidential and exempt from the Public Records Act pursuant to California Government Code §6254 (r ). Early consultation with Native American tribes in your area is the best way to avoid unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources or burial sites once a project is underway. Culturally affiliated tribes and individuals may have knowledge of the religious and cultural significance of the historic properties in the project area (e.g. APE). We strongly urge that you make contact with the list of Native American Contacts on the attached list of Native American contacts, to see if your proposed project might impact Native American cultural resources and to obtain their recommendations concerning the proposed project. Pursuant to CA Public Resources Code § 5097.95, the NAHC requests cooperation from other public agencies in order that the Native American consulting parties be provided pertinent project information. Consultation with Native American communities is also a matter of environmental justice as defined by California Government Code §65040.12(e). Pursuant to CA Public Resources Code §5097.95, the NAHC requests that pertinent project information be provided consulting tribal parties, including archaeological studies. The NAHC recommends avoidance as defined by CEQA Guidelines §15370(a) to pursuing a project that would damage or destroy Native American cultural resources and Califomia Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 (Archaeological Resources) that requires documentation, data recovery of cultural resources, construction to avoid sites and the possible use of covenant easements to protect sites. Furthermore, the NAHC if the proposed project is under the jurisdiction of the statutes and regulations of the National Environmental Policy Act (e.g. NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321-43351). Consultation with tribes and interested Native American consulting parties, on the NAHC list, should be conducted in compliance with the requirements of federal NEPA and Section 106 and 4(f) of federal NHPA (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq), 36 CFR Part 800.3 (f) (2) & .5, the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CSQ, 42 U.S.0 4371 et seq. and NAGPRA (25 U.S.C. 3001- 3013) as appropriate. The 1992 Secretary of the Interiors Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties were revised so that they could be applied to all historic resource types included in the National Register of Historic Places and including cultural landscapes. Also, federal Executive Orders Nos. 11593 (preservation of cultural environment), 13175 (coordination & consultation) and 13007 (Sacred Sites) are helpful, supportive guides for Section 106 consultation. The aforementioned Secretary of the Interior's Standards include recommendations for all 'lead agencies' to consider the historic context of proposed projects and to "research" the cultural landscape that might include the 'area of potential effect.' Confidentiality of "historic properties of religious and cultural significance" should also be considered as protected by California Govemment Code §6254( r) and may also be protected under Section 304 of he NHPA or at the Secretary of the Interior discretion if not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The Secretary may also be advised by the federal Indian Religious Freedom Act (cf. 42 U.S.C., 1996) in issuing a decision on whether or not to disclose items of religious and/or cultural significance identified in or near the APEs and possibility threatened by proposed project activity. Furthermore, Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, California Government Code §27491 and Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5 provide for provisions for inadvertent discovery of human remains mandate the processes to be followed in the event of a discovery of human remains in a project location other than a 'dedicated cemetery'. To be effective, consultation on specific projects must be the result of an ongoing relationship between Native American tribes and lead agencies, project proponents and their contractors, in the opinion of the NAHC. Regarding tribal consultation, a relationship built around regular meetings and informal involvement with local tribes will lead to more qualitative consultation tribal input on specific projects. 7 Finally, when Native American cultural sites andfor Native American burial sites are prevalent within the project site, the NAHC recommends 'avoidance' of the site as referenced by CEQA Guidelines Section 15370(a). If you have any questions about this response to your request, please do not hesitate to contact me at (916) 653.4251. Sir r ly, ve Sindte /�rogram Anal Cc: Stat: Clea - nghouse Attachment. Native American Contact List Pala Band of Mission Indians Historic Preservation Office/Shasta Gaughen 35008_Pala Temecula Road, Pala , CA 92059 PMB 50 (760) 891-3515 sgaughen@palatribe.com (760) 742-3189 Fax Pauma & Yuima Reservation Randall Majel, Chairperson P.O. Box 369 Pauma Valley CA 92061 paumareservation@aol.com (760) 742-1289 (760) 742-3422 Fax Luiseno Cupeno Luiseno Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources Manager P.O. Box 1477 Luiseno Temecula • CA 92593 (951) 770-8100 pmacarro @ pechanga-nsn. gov (951) 506-9491 Fax Ramona Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians Joseph Hamilton, Chairman P.O. Box 391670 Cahuilla Anza , CA 92539 admin@ramonatribe.com (951) 763-4105 (951) 763-4325 Fax This list Is current only as of the date of thls document, Native American Contacts Riverside County December 14, 2012 Rincon Band of Mission Indians Vincent Whipple, Tribal Historic Preationv. Officer P.O. Box 68 Luiseno Valley Center, CA 92082 jmurphy@rincontribe.org (760) 297-2635 (760) 297-2639 Fax Soboba Band of Mission Indians Rosemary Morillo, Chairperson; Attn: Carrie GarciE P.O. Box 487 Luiseno San Jacinto , CA 92581 carrieg@soboba-nsn.gov (951) 654-2765 (951) 654-4198 - Fax Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians John Marcus, Chairman P.O. Box 391820 Anza , CA 92539 (951) 659-2700 (951) 659-2228 Fax Cahuilla Morongo Band of Mission Indians Michael Contreras, Cultural Heritage Prog. 12700 Pumarra Road Cahuilla Banning , CA 92220 Serrano (951) 201-1866 - cell mcontreras @ morongo-nsn. gov (951) 922-0105 Fax Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of the statutory responsibility as defined In Section 7050.6 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This Ilst is applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources for the proposed SCH#2012041038: CEQA Notice of Cornplotlon; draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Bella Linda General Plan Amendment, et al.; located In the City of Temecula; Riverside County, California. Pauma Valley Band of Luiselio Indians Bennae Calac P.O. Box 369 Luiseno Pauma Valley CA 92061 bennaecalac@aol.com (760) 617-2872 (760) 742-3422 - FAX Pauma & Yuima ATTN: EPA P.O. Box 369 Pauma Valley CA 92061 (760) 742-1289 kymberli_peters @yahoo. com (760) 742-3422 Fax Luiseno Rincon Band of Mission Indians Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson P.O. Box 68 Valley Center, CA 92082 bomazzetti@aol.com (760) 749-1051 (760) 749-8901 Fax Luiseno Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Mark Macarro, Chairperson P.O. Box 1477 Temecula , CA 92593 (951) 770-6100 hlaibach@pechanga-nsn. gov (951) 695-1778 FAX Luiseno Thls list is current only as of the date of this document, Native American Contacts Riverside County December 14, 2012 William J. Pink 48310 Pechanga Road Luiseno Temecula , CA 92592 wjpink@hotmall.com (909) 936-1216 Prefers e-mail contact La Jolla Band of Mission Indians Lavonne Peck, Chairwoman 22000 Highway 76 Pauma Valley CA 92061 rob.roy@lajolla-nsn.gov (760) 742-3796 (760) 742-1704 Fax Cahuilla Band of Indians Luther Salgado, Chairperson PO Box 391760 Anza , CA 92539 tribalcouncil @cahuilla.net 915-763-5549 Luiseno Cahuilla Pechanga Cultural Resources Department Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst P.O. Box 2183 Luiseno Temecula , CA 92593 ahoover@pechanga-nsn.gov 951-770-8104 (951) 694-0446 - FAX Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of the statutory responsibility as defined In Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list Is applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources for the proposed SCH#2012041038; CEQA Notice of Completion; draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Bella Linda General Plan Amendment, et al.; located in the City of Temecula; Riverside County, Calitornia. Native American Contacts Riverside County December 14, 2012 SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Department P.O. BOX 487 San Jacinto , CA 92581 jontiveros@soboba-nsn.gov (951) 663-5279 (951) 654-5544, ext 4137 Luiseno ThIs list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of the statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list is applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources for the proposed SCH#2012041038; CEQA Notice of Completion; draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Bella Linda General Plan Amendment, et al.: located in the City of Temecula; Riverside County California. PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Post Office Box 1477 • Temecula, CA 92593 Telephone (951) 770-6000 • nut (951) 695-7445 VIA E-MAIL and U.S. MAIL Mr. Eric Jones Assistant Planner City of Temecula Planning Dept 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 January 23, 2013 3 .) g_ q_... . 2i; 146J J4/Y2 4 ii, 1?j' 2013' ,) General Counsel John L. Macarro Deputy General Counsel James E. Cohen Michele Fahley Steve Bodmer Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the City of Temecula Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bella Linda Residential Proiect, SCH# 2012041038 Dear Mr. Jones: This comment letter is written on behalf of the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians (hereinafter, "the Tribe"), a federally recognized Indian tribe and sovereign government. The Tribe formally requests, pursuant to Public Resources Code §21092.2, to be notified and involved in the entire CEQA environmental review process for the duration of the above referenced project (the "Project"). If you have not done so already, please add the Tribe to your distribution list(s) for public notices and circulation of all documents, including environmental review documents, archeological reports, and all documents pertaining to this Project. The Tribe further requests to be directly notified of all public hearings and scheduled approvals concerning this Project. Please also incorporate these comments as well as the Tribe's previously submitted comments and input, both written and via in person meetings, into the record of approval for this Project. The Tribe submits these comments concerning the Project's impacts to its culturally affiliated cultural resources and appropriate mitigation for the Project. The Tribe also trusts that this information will assist the City in developing appropriate avoidance and preservation standards for cultural resources that the Project will impact and will potentially impact. The Tribe thanks the City, the Applicant and the Project archaeologist for working closely with the Tribe on this sensitive and important area. As described in more detail below, this area is the last open space and previously undeveloped land that is associated with the Tribe's eviction from their last village in Temecula. We also appreciate the detailed and thorough mitigation measures. Please incorporate them, with the few minor changes as proposed, into the fmal documents and as conditions of approval. Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 2 THE CITY OF TEMECULA MUST INCLUDE INVOLVEMENT OF AND CONSULTATION WITH THE PECHANGA TRIBE IN ITS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS It has been the intent of the Federal Government) and the State of California2 that Indian tribes be consulted with regard to issues which impact cultural and spiritual resources, as well as other governmental concerns. The responsibility to consult with Indian tribes stems from the unique government -to -government relationship between the United States and Indian tribes. This arises when tribal interests are affected by the actions of governmental agencies and departments. In this case, it is undisputed that the project lies within the Pechanga Tribe's traditional territory. Therefore, in order to comply with CEQA and other applicable Federal and California law, it is imperative that the City of Temecula consult with the Tribe in order to guarantee an adequate knowledge base for an appropriate evaluation of the Project effects, as well as generating adequate mitigation measures. We look forward to continuing the SB18 and CEQA consultation process with the City of Temecula. PECHANGA CULTURAL AFFILIATION TO PROJECT AREA The Pechanga Tribe asserts that the Project area is part of Luisefio territory, and therefore the Tribe's, aboriginal territory as evidenced by the existence of Luisefio tribal heritage resources, place names, pictographs and petroyglyphs -- rock art (tdota yixelval), Village Complexes, Native American burials, TCPs, and other sacred places associated with the Luisefio Ancestral Landscape. The Pechanga Tribe's knowledge of our ancestral boundaries is based on reliable information passed down to us from our elders; published academic works in the areas of anthropology, history and ethno-history; and through recorded ethnographic and linguistic accounts. Of the many anthropologists and historians who have presented boundaries of the Luiseflo traditional territory, none have excluded the Temecula area from their descriptions (Sparkman .1908; Kroeber 1925; White 1963; Harvey 1974; Oxendine 1983; Smith and Freers 1994), and such territory descriptions correspond almost identically with that communicated to the Pechanga people by our elders. While historic accounts and anthropological and linguistic theories are important in determining traditional Luisei'Io territory, the most critical sources of information used to define our traditional territories are our songs, creation accounts, and oral traditions. The following information was prepared and written by Dr. Lisa Woodward, Archivist for the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians. A portion was excerpted and included in tSee e.g., Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994 on Government -to -Government Relations with Native American Tribal Governments, Executive Order of November 6, 2000 on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, Executive Memorandum of September 23, 2004 on Government -to -Government Relationships with Tribal Governments, and Executive Memorandum of November 5, 2009 on Tribal Consultation. 2 See California Public Resource Code §5097.9 et seq.; California Government Code §§65351, 65352.3 and 65352.4 PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band of Lulsetio Mission Indians Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 3 the DEIR however, the Tribe would like the entirety of the documentation included in the public record. The Bella Linda project falls within the larger area identified in this document as Temecula Village which spans for two miles along the banks of what is now known as Temecula Creek, extending from the confluence of the Temecula and Murrieta Creeks to what is now known as Butterfield Stage Road. The Temecula people lived in this area for thousands of years. According to traditional Luisefio beliefs, the world was created at `Exva Temeku (EXH-vah teh- MEH-koo), located at the convergence of the Murrieta and Temecula Creeks. Exva is translated as a "place of sand" and Temeku means, "sun place." The original inhabitants of Temecula have always lived within hail of their Creation place. Before European contact, the people lived along the banks of Temecula creek in several locations in the valley. The river provided water year round from the many springs that fed into the river. The abundant water in the valley allowed for the people to live in this location year round. The valley was known as the village of Temeku and when the Spanish-speaking settlers arrived in the valley, the name was changed to Temecula. The namesake for the City of Temecula is derived from this Luisefio name. The history of this location is not only important to the Luisefio Tribe but also to the City of Temecula. The village of Temecula was established during the mission era to support the San Luis Rey populations but it became an important stage stop and housed one of the first post offices in southern California after statehood. LUISERO CREATION AND ORIGIN AREA The Luiseno Creation and Origin Landscape is one of the most sacred areas to the Tribe and are evidenced by oral tradition, ethnographic studies and historic documents. The Origin Area Landscape is presently included in the Sacred Lands File with the State Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and is considered by the Tribe to be Eligible for both the California Register of Historic Properties and the National Register of Historic Places under all four criteria. In fact, a portion of the Origin Area is already included in the Register as explained herein. Although Temeku is described above as a Luiseno village (an archaeological village, if you will) there is another aspect of this place that holds tribal cultural values and is affiliated with the Creation and Origin Area, both in terms of tangible and intangible cultural resources. The Pechanga Tribe recognizes Exva Temeku, Temeku and the larger Temecula Village area as part of one Traditional Cultural Property (TCP). These three regions, although covering distinct time periods, represent one continuous occupation of the valley, from the Creation of the world, to the creation of the historical village, to the establishment of the Pechanga Reservation. This region is the most important locality for the Luisefio People; it is the place of their origin and where cultural social norms and practices were received. The Pechanga Tribe identifies these important places that are connected to the Creation as the Luisefio Origin Area, a TCP landscape. PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 4 A portion of `Exva Temeku was listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP) in 1972 (P-33-011443). According to National Register guidelines the Origin Area does meet the required guidelines. It is associated with the traditional beliefs of a Native American Group; includes patterns of land use reflecting the cultural traditions valued by its long-term residents; it is a location where Native American religious practitioners have historically gone and to perform ceremonial activities in accordance with traditional cultural rules of practice; and is a location where a community has traditionally carried out cultural practices important in maintaining its historic identity (Parker and King 1998:1). The Luiseno Origin Area is associated with cultural practices that are part of cultural beliefs "rooted in the community's history and important in maintaining the continuing cultural identity of the community" (Parker and King, Bulletin 38, 1998:1). Summary of Luiseno Creation Account According to the Luiseno Creation account, in the beginning there was nothing Kiwvish 'ataxvish (KEYW-vish ah-TAH-vish) meaning `empty', `unpopulated.' Several periods of time passed during which things began to take shape. This is where the Luiseno Origin recounted in ancestral songs say Tuukumit (TOO-koo-mit, Father Night Sky) and Tamaayawut (Ta-MAI-yah- whoot, Mother Day Earth) created the world. When Tiiukumit and Tamaayawut became one, their first offspring were earth and sand, which in Luiseno are 'exla (EXH-la) and 'exval (EXH- vol). `Exva Temeeku is therefore in reference to the first offspring of Tuukumit and Tamciayawut (Elliott n.d.:1069). Their children were known as the first people or Kaamalam (KAH-mah-lam) and were all things, including mammals, birds, trees, fog, and rocks. The birth of the world took place near the confluence of what is now known as the confluence of the Temecula River and Murrieta Creek which form the Santa Margarita River. The last of the Kaamalam born was Wuyoot (We-YOHT). He was innately gifted with knowledge and he knew how to make the first food, toovish (TOH-vish, white clay), to feed the Kaamalam. It is said Wuy6ot gave the people ceremonial songs when he lived at `Exva Temeeku, which are still sung today (Dubois 1908: 116-117). According to the Creation narratives, Wuy6ot was poisoned, and in an attempt to be cured, he visited several hot springs throughout the area that is now recognized as Luiseno territory. Several of the traditional songs relate this account of the people taking the dying Wuy6ot to various hot springs, which included Churzikunuknu $akiwuna, Murrieta Hot Springs, meaning `sliding place where hot water bubbles', and `itengvu Wum6wmu, the hot springs at Lake Elsinore, where he died at the end of his journey. As he traveled to these various springs, Wuy6ot also named the increments of time that had passed, which became the months of the Luisefio calendar. During this time, he taught the First People all of his knowledge (Dubois 1908; Roberts 1933: 6-7). Upon Wuydot's death, he was taken to 'Exva Temeeku and cremated. Wuyoot's passing was the first death of the Kaamalam. Death did not exist before this time. The Kaamalam were PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 5 so overcome with grief that the quail, roadrunner, and woodpecker cut their hair. This is a mourning custom still practiced today. The rocks and trees cried. Wuydot's death frightened the people, but to console the Kaamalam, he was resurrected as Mdyla (moon). Before that event, night had only been known to be full of darkness. The Kaamalam knew Mdyla-Wuyoot would always be with them. It is said after Wuyoot's death, they called a Grand Council at Kaamalam Pomki, located in the hills above `Exva Temeeku. During this Council the Kaamalam discussed who would become food, since toovish (white clay) would no longer be provided by Wuyoot. After several arguments as to why certain Kaamalam should not become food, it was determined that $nkat (SHOE -cut, deer) would be sacrificed. Upon the conclusion of this meeting, the First People dispersed to all corners of Creation, which is now recognized as Luiser3o territory. TEMEKU/TEMECULA VILLAGE When looking at the entire footprint of pre -contact Luisefio villages, they are much like towns today. Such is the case with Temeku/Temecula, the village encompasses other named places within it; Yamiinga, Wanki, and Pavkun. These areas are located within a 2-3 mile from the Santa Margarita River, east along Temecula River to what is now known as Butterfield Stage Road. This would be the equivalent to the City of Temecula with the areas of "Rainbow Canyon," "Vail Ranch" and "Redhawk." and which are all located within the boundary. So, when looking at a village, such as Temeku, which has a long rich documented history, assigning hard and fast boundaries is difficult. The 30+ sites located along Temecula Creek represent thousands of years of continuous occupation in the Valley. While archaeologists deem these sites individual "habitation areas," the Tribe sees them as one village with different components. In addition to the Creation place of `Exva Temeku, there are four other key components to Temeku Village. Wanki, located on the bluff where the old Vail ranch house stands, was the area where religious observances took place, where the ceremonial enclosure was located. The place name is actually the old form of the Luisefio word wamkish, which means "ceremonial enclosure." The retention of the old form of the name indicates this place has been in use for a long time. Human burials were also encountered in this area when the land was developed. Yamiinga, located at the old Vail Ranch headquarters (now known as the Kohls/Walmart shopping center) is derived from the word yaama, meaning "to endure, last a long time," is the name for the location of the historic village component which contained the adobe homes. This word is also an old term for an entity in the Luisefio creation account, yaamay, the "one who endures," which represents femininity in the world before the First People were born. Because we have two archaic terms located within the larger village of Temeku, which are places both in view of the creation place, it indicates this area is an important place to the indigenous people and has been inhabited for a long time. Adjacent to Yamiinga and Wanki, is a place called Temet Kari'aq, meaning where the sun rises and located on the bluff across the river from the Vail Ranch headquarters, which is an important event in the Creation story and also tied to the name "Temecula." PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 6 HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ORIGIN AREA AND TEMEKU VILLAGE The first direct European impact on the people of Temiku was the establishment of Mission San Luis Rey in 1798. The Valley became known as "Temecula" and a satellite rancho was established for the Mission (Engelhardt 1921). In an attempt to "rebrand" a traditional religious place into a Catholized one, the Mission built a warehouse at Exna Temeku. The valley produced large amounts of grain for the mission, which sustained a population of about 300 people. When Exna Temeku was studied in the late 1940s several mission era artifacts were discovered including floor and roof tiles (McCown 1955). Once the missions were secularized in 1834, large ranchos were created from the church land holdings. In the 1840s three land grants were created in the Temecula Valley: the Temecula, Little Temecula, and Pauba Ranchos. After the ranchos passed to several different owners, Domingo Pujol, Francisco Sanjurjo and Juan Murrieta purchased the majority of the Little Temecula, Temecula, and Pauba ranchos. During this time landowners in California began to impose property taxes and leases upon the Indians who lived on the now privately owned ranchos. The owners were successful in obtaining a Writ of Ejectment from the San Francisco courts on the grounds that the Indians could not prove title to the land. The new owners told the Temecula Indians they could remain in their homes if they signed leases, which they refused to do. On September 20, 1875, under orders from the District Court of San Francisco, Sheriff Nicholas Hunsaker of San Diego and approximately twenty armed men evicted the Temecula Indians from their traditional village. The Temecula village was located along both sides of Temecula Creek near what is now known as the Redhawk housing development and the Home Depot shopping center. The writ contained the names of 52 heads of household, representing over 200 inhabitants. The armed posse led by Sheriff Hunsaker, which included the owners of the ranch as well as local landowners Louis Wolf and Jose Gonzales, drove wagons to the Indians homes and loaded their belongings. The eviction took place over three days. The Indians did not fight back because anyone resisting would be shot. The people protested by sitting down and refusing to move their belongings. The women wailed and the men lowered their heads and covered their faces. The posse arrived with wagons and loaded their belongings onto them. They were then forced to leave the village following behind the wagons. They had to abandon their crops and most of their livestock. The posse shouted insults and threw stones to get them to move along. They traveled along a trail which now closely follows Loma Linda road. Once they were off the rancho, the men threw all their possessions onto the ground, smashing pottery that contained food and belongings. The people were dumped along what is now known as Loma Linda Road near the intersection of what is now Pechanga Parkway and Rainbow Canyon road. John Magee, who was the former owner of the Little Temecula Rancho, had a store near the area where the people were dumped (the adobe ruin still stands and is located on Pechanga Golf Course). Magee was married to Custoria Nesecat, a Temecula (Pechanga) Indian. The evictees who remained in the valley settled on Magee's land along the foothills near two springs called PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band of Lutseno Mission Indians Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 7 Taavishpa (TAH-vish-pa) and Tuuchaana (TOO-cha-nah) while some moved to Peehanga Canyon where they sunk wells and planted crops. It wasn't until, June 27, 1882, under Executive Order by President Chester A. Arthur, the Pechanga Reservation was established. The name is derived from a spring at the foot of the mountain named Pechaq (PEH-chaq) meaning, "water is dripping." Jackson returned to Peehanga in May 1883 and reported that the people had built houses and large tracts of land were planted in grain while the neighboring white man's crops on the lands from which they were driven were poor and "hardly worth cutting." Due to lack of water, farming on the reservation was difficult and making a living was a challenge. In the early 1900s several families moved away from Pechanga to find work. The people who stayed were employed as cowboys, ranch hands, and domestics on the local households. The original inhabitants of the valley have always lived and continue to live within hail of their Creation place and in their ancestral homelands. DEVELOPMENT OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY AND ITS' EFFECT ON THE VILLAGE During the ranching era, the landscape of the Valley did not change much, until 1965, when the Vail Ranch was sold to a development corporation. In the 1980s and 1990s full scale development of the valley began and the Temecula Village broken up and recorded as separate archaeological sites under CEQA. In Temecula Valley (through which the Temecula Creek flows) there are over 30 individual recorded "sites". However, only studies conducted on the Vail Ranch complex discuss the Indian village located within the ranch boundaries. Several published sources discuss the "historic" village but fail to make any connection to the pre -contact village and its population. In actuality, the pre -contact village and historic village of Temeku/Temecula span the entire valley, as outlined above. TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PROPERTY Because of the historical importance of the region including its association with the Creation Area, the continual habitation of both the Temeku and Temecula Villages, and the events surrounding the eviction of the Temecula people, the Pechanga Tribe deems the Origin Area, and all of its associated places a Traditional Cultural Property (TCP). Under National Register Bulletin 38 guidelines, this area would be eligible as a TCP because it: • is associated with the traditional beliefs of a Native American Group • includes patterns of land use reflecting the cultural traditions valued by its long-term residents • is a location where Native American religious practitioners have historically gone and to perform ceremonial activities in accordance with traditional cultural rules of practice PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band of Lutseno Mission Indians Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 8 • is a location where a community has traditionally carried out cultural practices important in maintaining its historic identity (Bulletin 38:1). This Traditional Cultural Property is associated with historical events and cultural practices that are part of Luiseno beliefs and "are rooted in the community's history and important in maintaining the continuing cultural identity of the community" (Bulletin 38:1). Because we Pechcingayam (Pechanga People) have always been located nearest our Creation Place and traditional village, we are driven to protect this sacred area. For us, the names of places left by Wuydot, imparted by ancestral stories and songs, are not by accident. Neither do they function as western concepts of cities or townships. A place name for us demonstrates our ancestor's sense -of -place and knowledge of the land and all things that inhabit that environment. These examples illustrate a direct correlation between the oral tradition and the physical place, proving the importance of songs and narratives as a valid source of information. The Bella Linda property falls within a mile of the Luise() Origin Landscape, a Traditional Cultural Property. CONCLUSION The Project area encompasses three important components for the Pechanga Tribe, religious, cultural, and historical significance. The Project area contains both archaeological features as well as intangible cultural features in the form of locations where historical and religious events took place. The Bella Linda project property is located in between the Creation Area, `Exva Temdku, and the historic Temecula Village along the bank of the Temecula River. Aerial photographs of this parcel reveal sections of this property have not been mechanically disturbed in sixty years. Since the native soils are intact, they more than likely will contain cultural materials and artifacts. During a walkover survey on May 1, 2012 by Pechanga Tribal archaeologist and monitors, cultural items were located on the property. Other pre and post - Contact artifacts were uncovered on adjacent properties in previous studies. Furthermore, Loma Linda Road is the route travelled by the Temecula evictees in 1875 who were dumped in the vicinity of the project area. Historical accounts of the eviction state the people's belongings were loaded into wagons and then dumped about a mile from the Magee Store (the remnants of which still stand on the Pechanga Reservation). It is said that the belongings were thrown from the wagons resulting in broken pottery and food processing utensils (including manos, pestles, and metates) all of which could now be unearthed on the project property (and possibly now part of the archaeological record on neighboring parcels). Studies on nearby parcels recorded artifacts that may represent the eviction event. In addition, human burials were discovered on the property directly across the creek from the Bella Linda project. A plat map from 1880s show there was "ruins of sweathouse" in the vicinity of the burials. Ethnographic sources describe the location of the sweathouse within a village as area where religious or ceremonial activities would have taken place. Thus the discovery of burials in the vicinity is not surprising. Since the Bella Linda property is located PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Ternerula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 9 directly across from the sweathouse and the burials, the potential for finding cultural materials is highly likely." Lastly, although there are significant tangible archaeological resources in the vicinity and on the Project property that are affiliated to the Pechanga Tribe, the geographic area consisting of the landscape itself holds a cultural value to the Tribe separate and apart from the artifacts because of the events that took place there as well as the meaning of the land to the Pechanga people. Thus, as outlined above, the Tribe's songs and stories, indigenous place names, as well as academic works, demonstrate that the Luisefio people who occupied what we know today as Temecula are ancestors of the present-day Luisefio/Pechanga people. The Pechanga Tribe is culturally affiliated to this geographic area. Therefore, Project impacts to cultural resources will be a direct impact to the culturally affiliated archaeological resources as well as the tribal traditional values, practices, self -governance and sovereignty of the present-day Pechanga Tribe. REQUESTED TRIBAL INVOLVEMENT AND MITIGATION The proposed Project is on Iand that is within the traditional territory of the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians. While the Pechanga Band is not opposed to this Project, we are opposed to any and all adverse effects and significant impacts to the Luisero Ancestral Origin Landscape Area. The Tribe's primary concerns stem from the Project's proposed impacts on Native American cultural resources. The Tribe is concerned about both the protection of unique and irreplaceable cultural resources, such as Luisefio village sites, sacred sites, traditional landscapes and properties, human remains and associated grave goods, and physical archaeological/cultural resources which would be displaced by ground disturbing work on the Project, and on the proper and lawful treatment of cultural items, Native American human remains and sacred items likely to be discovered in the course of the work. The Tribe is also concerned about direct and indirect impacts to the intangible cultural values of this geographic area, as it is located within the Luiseno Ancestral Origin Landscape. The Tribe appreciates the thoroughness of the archaeological study and the environmental document for this Project. We have reviewed the DEIR and proposed mitigation measures. Our requested changes are below (underlines are additions, strikeouts are deletions). Impact Cultural -I: The results of the Extended Phase I investigation, which included archival research, geoarchaeological review, Native American contact, field survey, and Extended Phase I testing, suggest the project area is sensitive for cultural resources. In addition, representatives of the Pechanga Tribe indicate the project area is sensitive for cultural resources, and that the project area is within the Luisefio Ancestral Origin Landscape Area, one of the most sacred areas for the Pechanga Tribe. Although the lack of identified subsurface archaeological materials greatly reduces the likelihood of encountering buried archaeological resources as a result of PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula ,Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 10 project implementation, it does not preclude this possibility entirely. The Pechanga Tribe was consulted in preparation of this EIR section. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented The project applicant shall be responsible for the implementation of the measures and the City shall ensure applicant compliance with the measures. Mitigation Measure Cultural -I -Retention of a Qualified Archaeologist: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground -disturbing activity, the applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (Department of the Interior, 2012) to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources (Mitigation Measures Cultural -2, -3 and -5). Mitigation Measure Cultural -2 -Cultural Resources Training: The qualified archeologist, or an archaeologist working under the direction of the qualified archaeologist, along with a representative designated by the Pechanga Tribe, shall conduct pre -construction cultural resources worker sensitivity training to inform construction personnel of the types of cultural resources that may be encountered, and to bring awareness to personnel of actions to be taken in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The applicant shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and shall retain documentation demonstrating attendance. Mitigation Measure Cultural -3 -Archaeological Monitoring: Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the qualified archaeologist shall designate an archaeological monitor to observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads. If ground disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The archaeological monitor shall keep daily logs. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring activities, which shall be submitted to the City, Pechanga Tribe, and to the Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside. Mitigation Measure Cultural -4 -Native American Monitoring: At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Pechanga Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City and the Pechanga Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement (Agreement). The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; the designation, responsibilities, and PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band of Lutseno Mission Indians Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 11 participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and all ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. A minimum of 30 days prior to issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity, a Native American monitor from the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the applicant to monitor all ground -disturbing activities including, but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, as specified in the Plan and Agreement. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more locations, additional Native American monitors may be required. Mitigation Measure Cultural -5 -Unanticipated Archaeological Resources Discoveries: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are made during ground disturbing activities, the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources, If the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the City Planning Director for decision. The City Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the CEQA with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Plamling Commission and/or City Council. Mitigation Measure Cultural -6 -Curation: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are recovered as a result of project implementation to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition as outlined in the Agreement (Mitigation Measure Cultural -4). Mitigation Measure Cultural -7 -Discovery of Sacred Sites: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula 23and of Lutseno Mission Malans Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Bella Linda DEIR January 23, 2013 Page 12 The Pechanga Tribe looks forward to working together with the City of Temecula in protecting the invaluable Pechanga cultural resources found in the Project area. Please contact Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst at 951-770-8104 or at ahoover@pechanga-nsn.gov if you have any comments or concerns. Thank you. Sincerely, %r74440 Michele Fahley Deputy General Counsel cc: Pechanga Cultural Resources Department PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band of Lutseno Mission Indians Mitigation Land Specialists Joanne Rodriguez, Broker, Principal 10/3/2011 VIM • LAND SYLCIALISTS Coyne Development/Waypoint Group / OPEN HOUSE Mitigation Land Specialists is pleased to present the public outreach on behalf of Coyne Development/Waypoint Property Group's proposed development of luxury apartments and senior homes located on a 21 -acre parcel at the intersection of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road in Temecula, California. The public outreach was conducted in two phases within three neighboring communities adjacent to the proposed project, and one neighborhood across Pechanga Parkway. The first phase included a personal contact with each property owner immediately adjacent to the proposed development, while the second phase included an extended outreach and three open houses for over 250 neighboring homeowners within a 1000 -foot radius (Attachment 1). Phase One: Scope: The goal of Phase One was to contact Homeowner's Associations and neighbors/homeowners immediately adjacent to the proposed project, in order to personally present the project details, discuss any project -related concerns, and obtain meaningful feedback. Two HOA's and 49 homeowners with property immediately adjacent to the proposed development were identified within the Riverwalk, Mahogany, and Temecula Lane Communities. Of the 49 properties, eight appeared to be vacant or in foreclosure, leaving 41 potential contacts. HOA contact: The Mahogany subdivision in Wolf Creek is managed by the Wolf Creek Maintenance Corporation. Ms. Susan Beaver is the community representative. The details of the outreach were presented to Ms. Beaver by phone and email. The Temecula Lane HOA is managed by Keystone Pacific Property Management, Inc. Mr. Jim Gamero, the Community Association Manager was contacted, and project details were presented at his office in Temecula, while arrangements were made to hold the community open houses at the Temecula Lane Clubhouse. In addition, contact was made with DR Horton Representative in the on-site sales office for the Reflections townhome project. Unfortunately, there is no HOA for the Riverwalk neighborhood surrounding Muirfield Drive. Project Presentations: On August 25th, 2011, a letter with an invitation (Attachment 2) to participate in a public outreach was hand -delivered to each property of the targeted homeowners. The letter described the project in general, inviting residents to participate it the public outreach by meeting with project ambassadors, who would be canvassing the neighborhood over the following two weeks. Residents who were not available to participate in the outreach were offered contact information to schedule an appointment at their convenience. The outreach was conducted between August 26th and September 10th, 2011, focusing on evening and weekend hours when homeowners might be available. During the outreach, in the event that homeowners were not at home, a note with a business card was left at the door. All targeted neighbors were canvassed at least five times, both days and evenings. Each available homeowner was given a full project presentation including the proposed site plan and architectural drawings (Attachment 3). The site plan demonstrated the project in relation to their property, including photos of typical luxury apartments and senior homes. The current and proposed zoning was discussed, and various project amenities such as the walking trails were highlighted. The architectural drawings, although not yet finalized or approved, included homes and apartments of similar style and quality to the neighboring Temecula Lane Project. At the conclusion of the presentation, each homeowner was asked to fill out a comment card, allowing them to approve of the project as presented, approve with comments, or disapprove of the project for whatever reason(s). A $5 Starbucks card was presented to homeowners who took the time to participate in the public outreach. Phase One Summary: In summary, of the 41 potential contacts, 29 households received project presentations and submitted comment letters (Attachment 4). 21 of 29 respondents were in favor of the project. The concerns of those who opposed the project are summarized below. There were many positive comments relating to the high-quality architectural design and re -zone from professional office to residential. All residents favored the pedestrian trails and proposed landscaping, and were especially pleased to know that the trails and landscaping would extend to the mini -storage on Pechanga Parkway. In general, participants favored senior housing, but were opposed to affordable or "Section 8" housing. Some preferred all senior housing. Residents seemed to favor townhomes or condos over apartments, concerned that apartments would bring down property values. However, when the style and architecture of the luxury apartments was presented, most residents agreed that they were of high-quality, and they were less concerned. They especially liked the residential "townhome" appearance of the proposed luxury apartments along Loma Linda and Temecula Lane. There was some general concern about building heights (three-story) and loss of mountain views. However, virtual photos were presented at the open house, which demonstrated that the lower elevation of the proposed site combined with the two- story profile of the apartments along Pechanga Parkway, Loma Linda and Temecula Lane would minimize the impact to their views. Additional feedback included concerns about traffic impacts and congestion from high-density housing, and a desire for retail shopping. Residents were pleased to learn that there may be retail shopping coming soon along Pechanga Parkway. One owner preferred a strip mall or dog park at this location. Some residents had concerns about dust control, and one in particular had a difficult experience with construction dust from the Temecula Lane project ruining a pool pump and filter . She also had security -related concerns, adding that squatters and teenagers were known to "hang-out" at the construction site, resulting in vandalism and car burglaries. Another resident of Riverwalk was very concerned about a degraded stormwall behind Canterfield Drive potentially endangering the homes along Temecula Creek. She felt that no new development should go forward until this issue is resolved. She also had feedback in favor of senior housing and affordable housing, asking that the senior homes be one story. There were several discussions with homeowners about rodents in the area being disturbed by construction activities. Residents would appreciate a rodent control program initiated prior to construction, so that they would not be inundated by fleeing rodents when the bulldozing begins. Phase Two: Scope: Phase Two of the public outreach was planned to expand the community contact to over 250 additional households within a 1000 -foot radius, by way of open houses held at the Temecula Lane clubhouse, located at 31145 Sunflower Way. Open houses were scheduled for three dates: Saturday, September 17th, Wednesday, September 21st, and Saturday, September 24th. Invitations (Attachment 5) were hand -delivered on Wednesday, September 14th to households in all three communities (Mahogany, Temecula Lane and Riverwalk). In addition, 26 neighbors with homes adjacent to Pechanga Parkway in the Loma Linda neighborhood (across Pechanga Parkway) were invited to attend. The invitations included a virtual reality photo of the proposed luxury apartments along Loma Linda. Residents were encouraged to attend, meet the development team, learn about the proposed project, and enjoy hosted refreshments. Contact information for a project representative was provided. Prior to the open houses, twelve lead-in signs with balloons were placed along Temecula Lane and Sunflower way. The three open houses were attended by over 30 residents, representing 23 households. Neighbors were greeted by a project representative, asked to sign in, view the displays, and fill out a comment card prior to departure. Participants who filled out a comment card were offered a chance to enter their name into a drawing for dinner at the Claim Jumper. The project display consisted of seven large posters depicting the proposed site plan, landscape plan, aerial photos, and virtual reality photos of the trails along Pechanga Parkway, Loma Linda, and drainage areas behind homes along Muirfield Drive. Mr. Steve Coyne, Coyne Development, Mr. Larry Markham, MDMG, Mrs. Joanne Rodriguez and Mrs. Cynthia Palmer, Mitigation Land Specialists were on hand to discuss project details and answer project -related questions. Refreshments of coffee, juice, soda, cookies, donuts and muffins were provided (Attachment 6). Phase Two Summary: Overall, the phase two outreach participants supported the proposed development, as presented. Of the 23 households, 17 filled out comment cards. 15 residents were in favor, while only 2 were opposed (Attachment 7). Open House attendees showed support for residential zoning at this location, and the removal of the Section 8, "affordable housing" component. Phase Two comments were similar to the phase one comments above, with residents expressing concern about traffic, noise, dust, and security on the construction site. One resident suggested an extension to Via Del Coronado to relieve traffic congestion. Another suggested that the proposed density was too high. The two opposing comments were related to increased traffic, the inconvenience of construction, and the concern over apartments in lieu of homes in the area.However, most residents agreed that the luxury apartments had more appeal than typical apartments. Follow up: Coyne Development/Waypoint Property Group intends to remain available to the community to address any issues which may arise related to the development. Residents and HOA managers have been encouraged to contact project representatives with any questions or concerns they may have throughout the entitlement and construction. Attachment 1 1000 feet buffer HY 711 S r- ,..,.,) i i r 1 I 1 0d IA, I r•, ai i ' G /'''5'.., .. i f CI) ? � ��r J/1 / CO it r -om- ./t �,/ •t 41 ,,,• •r�r\ f': \ �r> W �) O r e. • oNLWilwiTO\iY if>Ili �•1kr1r1 �r,}5< . ,F (•t >C`1Y v Y ?= 154. 41 4, so 9 tJ3�Y 2 .1) • 1.1=)MA Lil- I)11, Rf.1 ! ;elected Parcels )•.): 03,? l:ai3 _LZ 3l2-114!+ 91 961 .i1I COI 61`11-11-I-lul) •}22 112.037 9 -d -:i0 035 961.112 (113 9c.` 1141 01)0 9::I 32 0'.3 i;:.t t;;a�s=!1;:-3;i' 019 .i' I-;:31 r3 1)6.1 332 002 961-0.11 004 081.314 0136 961 3311 001 922.321 002 922-312-041 918-3131-0:.'9 914; '.r,,1 ::C17 0111-(1;17.003 961•f:41-001 018 301-02.3 322 312 018 961 042 009 9131 03' 017 961-3'2-008 9i;'-450.01;3 j°ri5. 311 •:3'7 • 1 i.11" slit-r:lt-i;l(::3 }ii1-:312:?il.f 96 -11712-01; 061.031-023 9610430 07 961'043.001 901'3'2019 461-043-013' 9131.031.616 ) •t 312 2!1 8.3111-1121 922.312-034 061.043.012 92? 312 024 961 031 019 01.31 020-028 901 020.029 i61-451)-(01 9131 •tti;,� • 450 :0; 961 lb; 1 161 •1.5;1 015 1361-(1.:11) 1.I9 922 322 012 961 312 014 9131 =:20.029 94.31-420-041 41;1.42.0-043 }5' .15 .;-659 )ot-«50•L:f;l 1111 ; 5.1-i:d 5 i1;.1••1s4-o19 061 +184-077 961.457 1045 961 042 003 922 313-015 001 •04?'U0Y 961-.117-[.11)1 Ei}'-314 -1.::; Ji•1.3111i01 918-101-.'""A 061.311 011 918 301 041 922323-008 961-3114019 94)193I -0'%I 351311-1105 961 111-11)9 4r'-:i'i•;:i?/ f51 -?'a -Litt 1322 321;(1? 918:3113-02,3 918 302 057 951 312 CI' 922 312•020 918.301.606 96!-421: 011) 9I!!. -:M)2 -CI' 1316-:1111-!:11 '•J .J `its J jf4 • • 17,4,.toro- J J i .1:00 500 0 1 (11)0 1:( -?1,t i.l .J: td aie 1: b,: isnd to, r-h?rli i:.i t,,r:.JSn.: n'Ii 1,1:.,. 'rah irrr. Irn, arpr• rin 1 ::.+. r,1 arriirarn in anmry.iiit ,;njinr..u+y} •Il.,i- ts'•.Is T n: C..:•,::•' !if P. Rera.•. fl'.ik -, I Ci •5' it,.jr :•, :r •.):: , :.c » b :.:r (r.11ef: Ilre<.,?Ur.@ ;: ;r<n:niin; ir;y 1 •rr inr1 r inn:nrt :: or c.,rurNnr s:s :i r;.if r...!.L:•, ar-•; .1:4 nr.1 as:umr.e 11.11:4;4 m:111)136'4, 65• II•!: iuL,in .ifii,r.i:, i; riaJ :11 this 1:1:1p ••n - j - :r 1.11 > C',e l )O? if;c., )n:: iei.+;.;i:r. ,:b411 In:f,, :in..: Attachment 2 J i Mitigation Land Specialists For: Coyne Development/Waypoint Property Group J i\i I n1`IGATIUN LAND S !'EC.IALLS'1'S August 23, 2011 Dear Neighbors/Homeowners: Coyne Development / Waypoint Property Group is pleased to announce exciting plans for a high- end development of luxury apartments and detached senior homes at the intersection of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Rd. in Temecula. The project proposes a well-planned, high-quality neighborhood including numerous amenities such as monument signage, an extended pedestrian trail system, and professional landscaping along Pechanga Parkway. From planning through construction, it is our desire to be a good neighbor to the community of Wolf Creek. Coyne Development will host community meetings in September to share our plans with neighbors (within 1000 ft) in the communities of Mahogany, Temecula Lane, and the neighborhood surrounding Muirfield Drive. You will be notified of these meetings by mail. However, prior to the community meetings, we would like to personally contact a few selected neighbors who are immediately adjacent to the project. We invite you to participate in our public outreach. Two project ambassadors will be canvassing your neighborhood over the next two weeks, from August 26- September 9th, 2011, hoping to take a few moments of your time. You will have the opportunity to preview the site plan and architectural drawings, offer feedback, and address any project -related concerns you may have. If it is more convenient, please feel free to contact us to schedule an appointment by calling (760) 580-1969. Either way, we look forward to meeting you. As a thank you for your time, we are offering a $5 Starbucks card for each household participating in this portion of the outreach. We thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, Jonne Rodriguez, Broker/Principal Cynthia Palmer, Public Relations - 1905 Avowood Ct. IFallbTook, California 92028 (760) 580-1969 DRE 01773173 J J Attachment 3 Conterfield D ' I r- ,/ ,/ ,/ \ \ \ ,..." \ \ ,/ A • v / \ o/ b./ • C/ „0,.• .,„0 \11.0 c•-••• c- ..... .s.- ./ . /../. ,c).....4...Q.-2- / \ \ ,/ N / \ ./ \ / /. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN \ / \. SOIL/ /. \ . /*// 0 01231 50 100 PROKCT NO. 1047.001 207 \ . Temecula Lane 11 THE SM COYNE COMPANY, INC. TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA Tillirr Ms* :OM 200 ...,CA97612 :::.2"93.100?"8% • L L L Trod .1 or CONCEPTUAL STREElSCAPE 'Ar.. 'ever CONC EPtuAL PASEO WA& Sponi C CLUSTER 1 HOMESITES •....�• )14.(Xt3 PLAN 3: SPANISH PLAN 2: COTTAGE PLAN 1: MONTEREY TYPICAL FRONT CONCEPT ELEVATION SCALE: I/4• = l -o. PLAN 2: SPANISH PLAN 1: CRAFTSMAN PLAN 3: COTTAGE TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION BUILDING 1 6•PLEX J40t00 • MSC NO :Jrao) IMESEM ®It*TM M H: {9M Is 1 4 Linda Sneath rarinet nct 71 'nil um 1. Attachment 4 August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and legal owne / lessee ('rcle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechangaa way in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. 1 offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, Sig ature 041N~f-i*-D Print Name 310(q' *Yow rr �s ;i,c�tle ew�ecv�(,, C/ 9-2 Address J �D-(Q36.-- (s3 Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident lega owner lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road echanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. o 1 approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: NCc e..e mc4 j r oH- Print Name Address Phone Number •J J August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and leg owner Lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: 'X 1 am in favor of the project as propospd. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: C o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, •Ct ? Si4 t)re <A, � .' ,c Print Name Address r`: L �r Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and leg 1 owner lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road ff anga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, , / j(k% Signature Print Name Address 1 Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and legal owner lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: > I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Signature M.441 e\6/ L-v►ne Print Name 3l 03t.( c�,i-r'P, J ben 4-ree L n Address X66- 3 19 Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and leg *i owner) lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road Pet anga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: `\ I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, Sig ature Le \ ee Ak\-e,e.(\ Myers Print Name Address Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and le�al lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: X I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: ?Jouto Signature wd FCt'n- Print NamC-(11 "1* -)e kOatii V)* kVira9 Wa 1- ttA\°I I qa Address m au- 9.Do Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident legal owner Y lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Ro—effhanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincere S'g /:/ re 5/ice`--- Print Name si?'r lddp, ure Address Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident legal owne lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: ,4/ >c/ n.0 p4, s Print Name 1/990D if F .DC Address Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and le ownesr / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road o changa Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, /7`'c/ Signaturet e O FDc755g17' Print Kane AcYres`s " " 7 - 3e)) Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor an 't Council: T am a resident and legal owner J lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road changa Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: • I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, Signature Marc c 1 I 1 ns Print NameJ 44g4. Akhct lt)c Address 95i- Gqq- SYsa Phone Number 11I I TIGATI ON 1. •l N it 4M:(`I A 1.14'C S Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. 1 have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: el I am in favor of the project as proposed. I approve of the project as proposed, with the following comments: o I am opposed to e project as proposed for the following reasons: Ignature 0 -Prtitw.gouNiN Address &1- L�i� . 97 Phone August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road ff P anga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: '1 I am in favor of the project as proposed. 14 I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: oldcI /4.4- o 5e ' 4-i z ay7lu :.( lo/lin - rip 't.Cj . !1�c c& 5 i.s1E livtit. U o 1 am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, gnature c-� Y etc -e. Print Name Address IJV re -77e. Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and legal owner lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Roa off Pec anga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. ® I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: 4 vt:. r ,cry A i a 2 4 ? w a 11.n t > ISN rl • *YL A< -✓l { 1 t_\. t tAn.S7AC.'c I/V-'--% NI! File o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincere Stgnatur Atoft-I J` -i bUt DE Print Name s t 0-1 ! t c i1-[s2y PLR C,6 Address 9S( -52-(x- 3334-7 Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and41010)/ lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road o • echanga Parkway in Temecula. 1 have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. `X I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: jl1Q ?� SArrLI horruAe,.!4,LSr)(4.VA.n9 ?a-wl Shot .c.Pci be PA. i-utat d di/ LGte v)ezy ) SA -0( L. 111711%-9 1 ()cLQd l i ee 0- bn`c.,- A -)c?) /l %�()t be fu g irYUI PLOT' -12 no tt.3 (Le (00.131v2/3t t yl h i -Fc cr,uL Skcxs& d ehe +AGI Wain o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, Print Name ) (--IAB &LI TWrfiPtd©l. Address (pc, `S 78 - tot -//So Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and 1eg1 own / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road echanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: i �-t-rz v,.,, ►„ ex) c. n tw 1- n a -"A ; `t" 4.1 -la r l..J J v \ (il L7j C.) F at el l.. re +v F O 1-14- 9 }7 u 5 rL OS S r P-h.Ci- . % If.77&i t`'VE. o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sinc Signature ?rpt Print Name 1/45 ace ,rhuift,CiI t:/ p41Je Address .Sk- (01 O-14f7,S' Phone Number 1 August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and legal caner lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. >a/ I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: V-4 p '(S 42x),\1 p, . M l% G(e -11,n 5 u i p- o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Si rely, Signature 0-K(D S erg -(2w1,) Print Name .J J y� g/(0 tl I 42•Wc,14) D� Address P ne umber J August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: 5,o;i ties 0 c:4) tiu,,\ p1(AV\ :3OjV(WS fraOne y (.)n;)i(4 be toc �Pr. V. 30tr),( s.: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, L Signature CsLail,Q u( k/I0 Oz Print Namek, Stt3L E-lied<ov�f Address 4.c l 44c=0()(33 P /ace Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. rb.� nI approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: l/ Akt (), S- o o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely Si Print Name Address L �� 89 u 4t€7 w o -%r 323 ZR3 Phone Nu ber August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident legal'owner )' lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Lorna Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. .4/ I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: aafrrvvcd ,s'eo r c%i�Cv, 1„ 'f te( (.4(urarse-ivre r dpec. #'11 loco %fcl royfr tom!P Zr/ 7 owlet � -1nIS �lV•e% Imor € of Lc0•S-tS' le f cam , /I z4Y) r �/'�l it e ✓^ �' N `►e% ..cerro, c -l4 ei'i p ?le o 1 am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, J L3%g1C (. rc-ut% rr 7 �Te e, A 41 wsy J Address (751- 903e1 J Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and leg 1 owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road o echanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: U184.,0 -Ca �b ; -c1J�is Fcfm i i C� e Yy2 Lava (cl , /-Y/s0, (44 Cavt C.Q ( ark -t e FP S/ra-i-i S-}-f\A-elf 3 curl -D Rk t +a Fac c_ y I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: `DOSS old m n ctv-C 41_ -2 Q- . Pill 1 � c I� Cy°e&ot-� /0 i"ri"(2)G(.U-ep /24.0 /`E , CG�s h (a� i s f {Q. S fa Q - ince Signature ob eT� S G\Qr'n Print Name S o S Address (9s,) b9`) -?031 Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident legal lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Lorna Linda Road changa Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: Xl I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: 8.--A,A5 r 441-- + 4- - -L c t {-.,J re (-,,i .. i -L< s-j-bi.n w a 11 6c_cvic J ke h 0,, C rri M u' f -i c Id 1)r,tre, r 4 - r 4 n,y &.d J , '�-r o -, k .1 C �. +'i L)( ',nits I /! 00,- a roti R-1s� L,e. f a -[-J 1Qfc-nrati 64-//-_ 114:1QSI n� de'rl 10,- Il -1- /� `�c7-t'- b , 7 S + /' `1 .l. a iVl 1 6 'f t{ ,.„-„ ' r, l'7 e 4 , U /^ h.,. �1r�, l n �, l -Y1 1 �Or (, ) US ✓ v fl W 6.. ill ck4 -'� i t,r,i tL U . Z /S Sir'dbr�^ endaclae r,.tic,, home -s 6�Cat -c/Fcc a -Dv . Tha_ s-l�-oJ .,., wct t 1 Loa s c pro\Je J, rx 1 RQ 7 Signature/ C.tj.. €n5trv_e/s W7k5,L_A-1,tiett 2-7 Z u is Print Name q'Vq7g inburdlea ?�,e Address 0/51-5-O-67'/7"-/ Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: �� I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and lega ot" caner'/ lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: IA1_1 opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: CV .Y114.te Signature 17N Print Name L---1 A'IMWICN fair Phone Number d1Zcci August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community ancjlegal owner/ lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: mopposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sincerely, Signature r;se Print Name 3lUC�b Address i) -a Phone Number ',ncOCNC .Z. �r�,WJPrr/ —2.:- z -"t-eC•-) =,k August 26, 201 1 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and legal owne? / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road o-Peehanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: ->erl1ers fl a <"' (.live 1 'v-�- l gyrt � • nr I jfix�, Sincerely, Signa a ✓vim 1.1 U744flit Print Name 30.-94 e;.,./Tef A ld ‘N. Address Phone Number l/U August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community and legal owner' / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity.to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o 1 am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: asp -ago -139 z- 1 Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off- echanga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: 1 I am opposed to theproject as proposed for the following reasons: h' -f +C• 34,1-1y1 ad \ 4,A1 t)P - — lacc . et' rYla,4 32A,AS vw) t e Print Name Address 6/0— _9/ ` y 03 / Phone Number August 26, 2011 Mayor and City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident of the Wolf Creek Community afid legal owneN lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda ROW off Pech nga Parkway in Temecula. I have been personally contacted by a representative of the developer regarding the proposed luxury apartments and senior detached homes, and had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns I may have regarding the project. I offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. .rapprove of the project as proposed with the following comments: I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: 1 r are ±( i cA_-t h Ocryv2 s t`7 Y k�U��`�A C tin S Lh- T i ,1 y--(44 ' i� r Uti C"?.(3 f ` 'f YYT a t 17- li A Print Name 0/ S 1-0 Lti �'� / - Address Phone Number C--l(Rtior, ( LLA (- GmaiI - Opposition to project on the corner of Loma Linda/Pechanga Parkway Page 1 of I Ci 11 Cynthia Palmer <cynthia.arp@gmail.com> Opposition to project on the corner of Loma Linda/Pechanga Parkway 1 message Leigh Woeller <lwoeller@verizon.net> To: cynthia.arp©gmail.com Cc: Brian Woeller <bwoeller@verizon.net> To Whom it May Concern, Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:43 AM I am the legal owner of the property at 31084 Hickory Place, and I am opposed to the project for the following reasons: 1. The last time heavy equipment moved the dirt on that property, a lot of dirt blew into our backyard and into our pool, ruining our pool equipment. We were forced to replace two pumps, filters and pay for pool service to clean the pool frequently. The costs we incurred to repair the damage was thousands of dollars. In order for us to approve the project, the developer/city would need to provide us a solution to this issue. 2. We will not approve the project under any circumstances if there is any low income or section 8 housing as part of the project. 3. We would ask that you staff the project with security guards. While construction was going on in our community, we had many squatters and teenagers hanging around the construction site at night and as a result, our home was vandalized and cars were broken into. 4. We are opposed to the project if there are any parking spaces directly against the street facing our home. 5. If the project were to move forward, we would ask that it have a similar architectural look and feel to the properties in Wolf Creek and Temecula Lane. We also ask that mature trees line the street instead of small saplings. If the above issues can be remedied, I would be in favor of the development. Sincerely, Leigh A. Woeller 31084 Hickory Place Temecula CA 92592 https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=89be820dbf&view=pt&search=inbox&th=132264d... 9/1/2011 Attachment 5 .7) The development team for the corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road cordially invites you to an open house to learn about the upcoming improvements to your neighborhood. Please join us at one of our receptions for hosted refreshments at the Temecula Lane Clubhouse, 31145 Sunflower Way. Saturday September 17th 9-11 am Wednesday September 21st 6-8 pm Saturday September 24th 9-11 am We 61a4 jauva/ra' to meetu y mac! Questions? Call Joanne Rodriguez (760) 580-1969 Attachment 6 NAME ADDRESS PHONE .1•1 LA t ) f-at-.Av .---L-'‘ i 44 ".:--0 v•kk,o,,,...e.),..- k..."''`W:c.c,A, keki CA `WF -51?. 74,o - 1711 - E.Aocl kc Er,:k 'JQA.- 5s li 01-A-6 5.+ft"..(.4) bet`, i 172.0z_ 1Vt W9Ailtialt-.:(+ 411-q60 13411, P.050)7001/,. Vol / v .4,•:,.., • .... CL Octiy Pic-k-LtA i,frwA__ Q.-3- 3 1 4/.16- 0 4-5 v3 1 h\44.-torif tot- ( Itg),_34f. -03 i -y .-.. (-1 r 1 4) - -, , i 1 "( / C 0 -a.,,,, e_..-ila - ...s-4__ -3-7 0 3,,, . ....42..L, C 9v leis • 4 so, t c- )M ? OP rolitlr"1/4- uk-' 'i •, Yz- I -0V-/( (.,,,, AM-S-)Ok SIX1d( ("ray 5 Mt C_-.1( 1.1)41, IS --frt ?IS -6 roeel. fe,,,I. E-coLA c) 7 s-ci 2 ci • , , .4:47--6. Ai .1/8'66) ,--4,-3,x)/ net; c 7-&-::;c1••L'Fci,' - 44 '99 , -c,:02 ff-: 6 2 Y\ L fi,vw3 if,‘• ttiao Noll, g:019L. Oe. ., Ca,.+1 • ,' -/- - od Lv-cotc Pfi k , (2; ,- i 4,,,N i .:5 C 'Lk vvk •.1 - , , b — 07 Te.....,•,>,.. i -.1.5-: itoLMAitni SI, 90 sgrraW 13giavY 11W kki - VwivouLq. PA-14cLA vik-lAb.mk ur 4 5,..:71 Cra-uc .6 CI LA t 4. ONA (1 if`il 1 94 My itodoit IN.1 1AP iGATION 11. ND S1I.:(11.1,1ST Al1'1'1GATIt)N I,A NI) SPECIALISTS -KU CA 1 O (`4iterxt, C;614(a /17/orat/, (_.Lc tJa.,) I1 D5 to w red Lv" (1`50 tf(— 30g 2&1 Coyne Development/Waypoint Property Group Developer Open House September 171h, 21st, 241h, 2011 ROM FOR RESIDEIIIS DRY - -- •_ ,_..I • ' �� Jul ' •K. I Attachment 7 MITIGATION t7 LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant Iand on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: d I am in favor of the project as proposed. eI approve of the project as proposed.with the following comments: o I am opposed to e p ‘ct as proposed for the following reasons: ignature itolAtATN Print Name 1010 STU Vkl OVA 'f i-''( Address Phone MITIGATION LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Signature Print Nam Address ) l 6t Si Nt¢ N . i erAkit,.,A 1'11 z Phone MITIGATION LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o/ am in favor of the project as proposed. o/I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: J'IY\ z1-he+4 00;118)1_.(( a ( l� ( n -I r3 bQ Qoiv+s tion %1a3,d . o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Signa Print Name 1 4'1 L ?cps h �( Address '9\6c.(5'1.4 Phone MITIGATION LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident d legal ow / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. A I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: would p � C' LI o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Signature Care �hc- I "I od Print Naciie 3l(42 Suii-Flow Va.)/ Address 760 715-533) Phone J G MITIATION LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. dt 4approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: ture L,hd(X \vNNA Print Name Address Phone l J MITIGATION LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. • I approve of the project as proposed with the following commen)s: ,,<iPov/OE Ls'Ect4eii'y f.20mg , 2crrvi77E5'/ 6"/OG 6-4/CC. o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: .L siv4K.1 Viso c/ Print Name p/.066. ire . /6v0ECG/e...f5t eA- Address x/08 -603-//e/3 Phone �nq Y:S�r i MITIGATION LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal caner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant lan on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. >csI approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: jV 5 c:rr, e NCoz* c oASi%YUC'h OA -t-vM P Aka_ - o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: re ij l l !\ \---\--e4VccZ Print Name tiLcW "po(Q Address Phone • MITIGATION LANs SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: r o ch or er, JGie� )10 hese `izR' �6//"ks/j, tie 4144S'i oars PrP tip e 4inti Petifh t„ i�G d arc ff` z.e , x ieo / - o c r�`c_ %v i, fiy4git; Ako ltin anir-is (72 as re -a, j*-e-- Ceih.dscApin P Ac_u -- G o I anf opposed to theeproject as prop sed for thc folio if ng reaso feta 4 _ /reed Vo add ci_ ceu2`Gt/Q./ P�.w cvAo dila no j-- Wa,#-f-�.11 Gv1ce -eno.u) ©mor) ./- p'f k )D-l.<.(a. cat ( /oak. cokstfe Si {gn naature/ VI/V5 n �-�— I 1►t' IhW2Jl Print Na 1-1-543 frto,sfcrs Address • MITIGATION LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: x0 I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: caaAo 4/11' ,s'ngaa 7'- ame % Address zss-)11 2/11` Phone MITIGATION LA:Nn SPEC/A .ISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Signatur Print Name h°e(/ 2/6g24/ C- ;pi.2ce)/A, 1 '9 Address 957- 6 .?J -0217L3 Phone MITIGATION LAND) SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and j al ow / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent t� the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: XI am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: J.' [ /fi 7 t is'f�ll1 l4 t1 -4011W ',4Wail I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Phone t.t '`'; MITI TION 6,0 LAND SIPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: is/' I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: s nature Print Name Address CC)- '--)6)—(0/ l'rs,Ac�� MITI Ali I� GA TI 4v Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and leg. owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant lan• on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Sign ture al� Print Name 'FOLof \`\owe- \\\, TR Address ,►,(`�\(/\7(0 d Z17'5(Pq Phone ` MITIGATION LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. 1 have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. 1 have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. • I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: or.(2e epeAvv.0,77 CcriT\c-s/� . e.Y Cvc)cQ,(l.n.ed • J C_Q ejan p- 7 Lk1CO.iS)zod, %/Lim ry\ \\ L) 0-04;_018-, o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Si nature Print Name -31.°35 PaDa Address cd a,s LI Q r-)\ - fl - (Q.� g a - Phone MITIGATION LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: �7t are. r-e,An.al r o I am opposed to the project as proposed for the following reasons: Signature Print Name Address 1 CIS(— 3O -27 Phone MTI GATZ4N LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: I am opposed to the project as proposed fort a following reasons: M Hoe 1 wo,, Ic1 I3p DQ «rproprovle +or Fine prose (ft ini fh(� of rt i - " n -i5 ' rke4t a e aya(l-r^e. -k l 4r.. 4 i+In.. se./ere, l ,4;I Si natur Print Name Cill5 I / e0 PeY b/-4-rk_ Address 3.35- 77 6 6 7y) Phone MITIGATION LAND SPECIALISTS Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a resident and legal owner / lessee (circle one) of real property near or adjacent to the vacant land on Loma Linda Road off Pechanga Parkway in Temecula. I have had the opportunity to view the site plan and architectural drawings. I have also had the opportunity to discuss any project -related concerns and offer the following feedback/comments for your consideration: o I am in favor of the project as proposed. o I approve of the project as proposed with the following comments: I am opposed to the project as proposed for the foll wing reasons: (corriC, P O Q. c rot/ Jritot7700 Si Print Name Address Phone DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: STAFF REPORT— PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 20, 2013 Eric Jones, Case Planner Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change to change the zoning from Professional Office to Planned Development Overlay 13 (PDO -13) and to create zoning and residential development standards; PA11-0275, a Development Plan to construct a two-phase residential project on a 22.73 acre site. Phase one will consist of a 325 apartment unit complex and associated amenities. Phase two of the project will consist of 49 age restricted single-family lots; and PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map to create 57 lots from three existing parcels. The project is generally located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road Approve with Conditions El R Section 15080 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: North: South: East: West: Lot Area: Larry Markham on behalf of Coyne Development Professional Office (PO) Professional Office (PO) (Existing) / Planned Development Overlay — 13 (PDO -13) (Proposed) Vacant / Professional Office (PO) Existing Residential, Pala Community Park/Low Medium (LM), Open Space (OS) Pechanga Parkway, Loma Linda Road, Existing Residential/Low Medium (LM) Existing Residential/Professional Office (PO) Pechanga Parkway, Existing Residential/Low Medium (LM) Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required 22.73 Acres (Additional 0.88 Acres Off -Site for Trail) Apartments: N/A Courtyard Housing: 0.08 Acres min. Lot Coverage: Multi -family Lot Coverage Provided: 35% Landscape Area/Coverage: Proposed: 33.5% Parking RequiredlProvided: Provided: 681 Spaces BACKGROUND SUMMARY Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Minimum Landscaping: 25% Minimum Parking: 681 Spaces On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, submitted Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, 0275, and 0277 to allow for a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay (PDO), Development Plan, and Tentative Tract Map for the Bella Linda residential project. The applications will permit the development of a two-phase residential project consisting of 325 market rate apartment units and the creation of lots for 49 age restricted single-family homes on a site totaling 22.73 acres. An additional 0.88 acres is located immediately to the northwest of the project site. This area will be converted from a concrete culvert and service road to a bio-swale and public trail. An Environmental Impact Report with corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared for the project. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay (PDO) The proposed zone change and Planned Development Overlay will allow for 325 market rate multi -family apartment units and 49 age restricted single family lots on a project site consisting of 22.73 acres. The Zone Change will revise the existing zoning from Professional Office (PO) to Planned Development Overlay 13 (PD0-13) which is based on the High Density (H) residential zoning. PDO -13 will contain zoning and development requirements for the project area. Density for the project will total 16.5 units per acre. This density is consistent with the High Density Land Use designation in the City of Temecula General Plan (13.0 — 20.0 dwelling units per acre) which is utilized for projects containing senior housing in Professional Office areas. Other General Plan designations surrounding the project site include Low Medium (LM) to the west and south, Open Space (OS) to the north (Pala Community Park), and Professional Office (developed with High Density residential) to the east. Tentative Tract Map The proposed Tentative Tract Map will divide three existing parcels totaling 22.73 acres into 57 lots to allow for the apartment buildings and single-family lots. Each newly created parcel will meet all PDO, Municipal Code, and General Plan requirements. Of these lots, 49 will contain the age restricted single-family homes that will be constructed in the future by a different developer. The remaining seven lots will contain the multi -family apartment structures, a detention basin, and associated landscape areas. Site Plan Phase one of the Bella Linda residential project is proposed as a 23 building, 325 -unit apartment complex with associated amenities including a club house and exercise buildings 2 with a pool. Phase two of the project will feature 49 age restricted single-family lots that will be sold to a different developer in the future. Residents will have pedestrian access to the multi- family recreation facilities. The existing General Plan designation and the land use development standards in the proposed PDO -13 will allow for the total number of units planned for the project. The proposed multi -family complex will include 99 one -bedroom units ranging in size from 791 square feet to 882 square feet, 173 two-bedroom units ranging in size from 1,033 square feet to 1,300 square feet, and 53 three-bedroom units ranging in size from 1,366 square feet to 1,410 square feet. Primary access to the multi -family complex will be from Temecula Lane at the eastern side of the project site. A secondary access point will be located on Loma Linda Road. This access will be right -in and right -out. Access for the single-family homes will be off of Temecula Lane. This gated private road will terminate in a cul-de-sac. An emergency access point will be located at the end of the cul-de-sac and provide direct ingress/egress between the multi -family and single- family components of the project for emergency vehicles. The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the site plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services. The project layout enhances the walkability of the community by providing varied building placement and pedestrian pathways that interconnect throughout the entire site. These pedestrian pathways connect to the on-site tot lot, club house/exercise buildings and pool facility. Apartment units located directly on Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane will feature front doors and pedestrian connectivity to the street. An immediately adjacent off-site concrete culvert and access road will be improved as part of the project. This area is located to the west of the single-family lots. The concrete culvert will be converted into a bio-swale and the access road will be converted into a meandering trail for use by the project and surrounding residents. Eighteen individual property owners each own a portion of this area. The applicant has provided an incentive for all owners to allow work to be done on their property. Part of these incentives include the construction of a rear block wall to replace the existing wood and chain link fencing. As of the writing of this staff report, the applicant has received written authorization to complete the work from thirteen of the eighteen property owners. Of the remaining five property owners, two are bank owned properties, one is in foreclosure and vacant, and the last two owners are in negotiations with the applicant. Architecture The proposed architectural styles for the project are Spanish Eclectic, Spanish Colonial, and Monterey. Design guidelines have been included in the proposed PDO. All of the apartment buildings are three-story with the exception of the structures located along Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane, which are two-story. The proposed clubhouse and exercise buildings are based on the Spanish Colonial architectural style of the apartment buildings and both are single - story structures. The project also proposes detached garages, decorative covered trash enclosures, and a maintenance structure. Four-sided architecture is provided throughout the project. The project utilizes stucco and manufactured stone as primary wall materials with earth tone colors on primary wall surfaces and contrasting trim colors. The various materials and features proposed include, but are not limited to, the following for each architectural style: 3 Spanish Eclectic: Shallow roof pitch, barrel "S" tiles, smooth stucco, decorative elements such as pilasters, round tile or stacked barrel tile attic vents in gabbles. Spanish Colonial: Square or rectangular plan form massing, hip or gabble roof, clay pipe attic vents, stucco -sand finish, wrought iron balconies and accent details, shaped rafter tails. Monterey: Wood balcony and railing, round tile accent vents, shutters on primary windows, brick accents on lower story wall, recessed accent windows. The proposed elevations for this project meet the intent of the Citywide Design Guidelines. The proposed elevations achieve an overarching design to create a street scene with strong character as well as function and visual variety. Landscaping The project will dedicate 33.5% of the site to landscaping. This amount exceeds the Development Code requirement of 30% for the High Density (H) residential zone. Perimeter streetscape landscaping will include a mix of trees and ground cover. All perimeter trees will be a minimum 24 -inch box size. Various types of ground cover will also be placed along the perimeter of the project. The project applicant has also agreed to install off-site landscaping along Pechanga Parkway, north of the project site. This area is located at the beginning at the western most portion of the project site and extends north along Pechanga Parkway for approximately 1,050 feet. This vacant area does riot currently contain any landscaping and is considered a community eyesore. The placement of landscaping along this stretch of road will beautify the area. As previously discussed, the existing concrete culvert and access road off-site to the west of the project area will be replaced with a fully landscaped bio-swale and trail connection for residents of the project and surrounding communities. This trail will feature bollard lights to illuminate the trail at night. Common area open space is provided throughout the site. As discussed above, the project includes a tot lot, network of pedestrian connections, clubhouse and exercise buildings, and a pool facility. The total usable common open space on site is 3.98 acres. Much of this area will be covered in turf for open use by the residents. In addition to common open space areas, all units are provided private patio/balcony areas ranging in size from 43 square feet to 71 square feet depending on the floor plan. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on March 7, 2013, and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an Initial Study, it has been determined the project could have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, an EIR has been prepared for the project. 4 A Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared under staff's direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA) and was distributed to responsible agencies, interested groups, organizations, and individuals. The Draft EIR was made available for public review and comment via the State Clearing House for a period of 78 days. The public review and comment period for the Draft EIR established by the State Clearinghouse commenced on December 3, 2012 and expired on February 19, 2013. Notices were mailed to surrounding property owners, signs were placed on the property, and a notice was placed in the local paper to provide a 45 -day noticing period for the public between January 20, 2013 and March 6, 2013. The City of Temecula received written comments and responded to each comment. Comments were provided by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Department of Transportation, Native American Heritage Commission, the Pechanga Tribe of Luiseno Indians, and Ms. Lauri Lewis. A copy of the City's response has been provided to commenting agencies as required by State law. A copy of the Draft EIR document has been provided to the Commission. The environmental analysis identified six areas where impacts were not considered to be significant. These areas are: Geology/Soils and Seismicity, Global Warming and Climate Change, Land Use, Population and Housing, Public Services, and Utilities. Six areas were identified where potentially significant impacts could be avoided or mitigated. These six areas include Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Traffic and Circulation. The EIR contains mitigation measures for those environmental impacts that can be mitigated to a less than significant impact in the form of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. One impact area (Noise) was identified as resulting in an unavoidable, significant impact due to temporary construction noises. In accordance with Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted prior to approval of the project because of this impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations states that any significant adverse project effects are acceptable if the expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. The benefit to the community provided by the project is increased rental residential options for Temecula citizens. In addition, the 49 single-family lots to be developed during phase two of the project will be reserved for members of the community that qualify for age restricted housing. The project applicant has also agreed to install off-site landscaping along Pechanga Parkway, north of the project site. This area is located at the beginning at the western most portion of the project site and extends north along Pechanga Parkway for approximately 1,050 feet. The placement of landscaping along this stretch of road will beautify the area. Additional landscape improvements include the concrete culvert and access road located adjacent to the proposed single family lots. The concrete culvert and access road will be replaced with a fully landscaped bio-swale and a trail that will provide an additional access point from Pechanga Parkway to Temecula Lane and Pala Community Park. This trail will be accessible to both the residents of the project and surrounding communities. FINDINGS Zone Change The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and Development Code. 5 The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the existing General Plan land use designation for the property. Planned Development Overlay 13 will establish the design and development framework for the project. As proposed and conditioned, the project design will be consist with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Development Plan The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Tentative Map The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. As designed and conditioned, the proposed map is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Temecula General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will riot be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed map does not impact land designated for conservation or agricultural use. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed map subdivides 22.73 acres to allow for 325 apartments and 49 lots for age restricted single-family homes. The proposed Tentative Tract Map design is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and the development standards for the Planned Development Overlay 13 zoning designation. 6 The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are riot likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on vacant property. An Environmental Impact Report (EBR) has been prepared for the project. As conditioned, the subdivision is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Fire, Public Works, Planning, and Building and Safety Departments. As a result, the project is consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with Fire and Building Codes and the City's General Plan and Municipal Code which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. A Statement of Overriding Consideration has been provided in order to account for temporary construction noises. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities to the extent feasible. All development must meet all appropriate Building and Fire Code requires as they relate to passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will riot conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. All acquired rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The project involves the construction of multi -family and single-family residential units. The project has been conditioned to ensure the City's parkland dedication requirements are met. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions / Off -Site Landscape Improvement Area PC Resolution — Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay Exhibit A — City Council Ordinance Exhibit B — Planned Development Overlay PC Resolution — Tentative Tract Map Exhibit A — City Council Resolution Exhibit B — Draft Conditions of Approval PC Resolution — Development Plan Exhibit A — City Council Resolution Exhibit B — Draft Conditions of Approval PC Resolution — Environmental Impact Report, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Statement of Overriding Considerations Exhibit A — City Council Resolution Exhibit B — Finding of Facts in Support of Findings Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) with Appendices Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) Public Correspondence Notice of Public Hearing 8 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: STAFF REPORT— PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2013 Eric Jones, Case Planner Planning Application Nos. PA12-0226 and PA12-0227, a Major Modification to allow a reduction in the number of buildings (from three totaling 65,640 square feet to two totaling 54,860 square feet) and a revision of the architecture for a previously approved Development Plan, and a Minor Exception to increase the height of the Halcon Rojo Medical office complex by 3'-3", located on the north side of Temecula Parkway, approximately 400 feet east of the Jedediah Smith and Temecula Parkway intersection Approve with Conditions Notice of Determination Section 15162, Consistent with the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Terry Strom, on behalf of Makena Medical Buildings Temecula, LLC. Professional Office (PO) Planned Development Overlay -6 (Rancho Pueblo) Site: Vacant Parcel/Professional Office (PO) North: Existing Single Family Resident/Very Low (VL) Residential South: Temecula Parkway, Existing Commercial and Residential/ Professional Office (PO) East: Vacant Parcel/Professional Office (PO) West: Existing Single -Family Resident/Very Low (VL) Residential Lot Area: Total Floor Area/Ratio: Landscape Area/Coverage: Existinq/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required 5.29 Acres 0.92 Acres Min. Per PDO -6 0.24 Proposed 0.50 Maximum Per PD0-6 36% Proposed 25% Minimum Per PDO -6 Parking Required/Provided: 260 Proposed 261 Required BACKGROUND SUMMARY On July 31, 2006, Jim Griffin submitted a Development Plan application for the Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex. The project consisted of 3 two-story buildings, each being 21,880 square feet, within the existing Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6). A Minor Exception Application was also submitted on December 2, 2008 in order to address a parking deficiency of ten spaces. In addition, a Zoning Amendment application was submitted on November 1, 2007 in order to amend the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6) by creating Planning Area C within the PDO. This new planning area will be the site of the proposed Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex and was previously designated as a ball field for the Rancho Community Church and schools. The project was approved at the December 17, 2008 Planning Commission meeting. On November 15, 2012, Terry Strom, on behalf of Makena Medical Buildings Temecula, LLC submitted Planning Applications Nos. PA12-0226 and PA12-0227, a Major Modification and Minor Exception for the building height. The applications will modify the originally approved project by allowing for the construction of 2 two-story medical office buildings instead of the original three buildings. The Minor Exception will allow for a height increase of 3'-3" above the PDO specified 40 foot height limit. The reduction in overall square footage of 10,780 square feet will allow the project to now be in conformance with Development Code parking requirements so that the project will no longer require a Minor Exception for parking. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Major Modification Site Plan The Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex is comprised of 2 two-story office buildings totaling 54,860 square feet along Temecula Parkway within the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6). Building 1 will be set back approximately 125 feet from Temecula Parkway. Building 2 is setback approximately 117 feet from the rear property line. This rear setback is desirable since the project is adjacent to existing single-family homes in an area zoned Very Low Residential (VL). It must also be noted that the project is bordered to the north and west by a Metropolitan Water District easement. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, which allows for multi -tenant office buildings and meets all provisions within the Development Code and PDO -6. Architecture The proposed building elevations and architecture for the project are consistent with the provisions contained within the Development Code, City -Wide Design Guidelines, and PDO -6. The architectural style of the development integrates distinctive Spanish style elements that are consistent with other developments located within PD0-6. These elements include segmental arches, mission roof tiles, and recessed windows and doors. In addition, the office buildings feature a smooth stucco finish that is consistent with other developments within the PDO. The two buildings are configured around a decorative trellis and landscape which is prominently facing Temecula Parkway. Covered outdoor eating areas with vines will also be provided for employees to use during breaks. Landscaping The selection and placement of landscaping compliments the overall development. Thirty-six percent of the project will be landscaped, which exceeds the minimum Development Code requirement of 25 percent for projects within a Professional Office zoning district. The landscape plans indicate that a landscape buffer of approximately 30 feet will separate the southern parking lot area from Temecula Parkway. Also, the Metropolitan Water District easement located on the north and western boarders of the property will be flanked by landscaping. In addition, landscaping will also be placed around each of the buildings as a way to provide an attractive visual break between the buildings, parking lot, and hardscape areas. The landscape plans also indicate that a desilting basin will be located immediately off-site to the east will contain hydro -seed. Access/Circulation Access to the site will be provided by a right-in/right-out vehicular ingress and egress from Temecula Parkway at the southeastern portion of the property. This type of access is necessary due to an existing raised median located directly in front of the property. Once on the property, vehicular access is provided around the entire site by the driveway system in the parking lot. A decorative round -a -bout feature has been included near the front courtyard of the project to add a convenient passenger drop-off location and visual interest. This area will feature decorative stamped concrete and a landscaped island. Minor Exception The applicant has filed a Minor Modification for height as part of the project. The maximum height for two-story structures in PDO -6 is forty feet and the applicant has proposed a maximum height of 43'-3". The extra height will allow for the installation of medical imaging equipment. The City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.03.060.B.2) states that increases for allowable building height of less than 15% are permissible upon the approval a Minor Exception application. The proposed height increase meets this threshold. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 4, 2013 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review. The previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration was designed to examine a total of 315,374 square feet of allowable building square footage for the Rancho Pueblo Professional Center (Planning Area B) located on the far east side of PDO -6. However, the Development Plan for the project was only approved for 217,378 square feet of allowable building area. This left a remainder of 97,996 square feet that was evaluated by the Mitigated Negative Declaration yet would not be used. 54,860 square feet of this remainder will essentially be transferred to Planning Area C in order to accommodate the Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex. The uses within Planning Area B and Planning Area C are consistent with each other. FINDINGS Modification (Section 17.05.030.E) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed use is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan. According to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Professional Office Land Use Designation allows for multi -tenant office buildings situated in a landscaped garden setting. This project consists of two 2 -story office buildings with sufficient landscaping and outdoor amenities consistent with the objectives contained in the General Plan. The proposed project is also consistent with all zoning requirements for the PDO -6. The project meets all applicable design standards contained within the Development Code and City -Wide Design Guidelines, and the design of the project meets the intent of the Community Design Element of the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and all applicable fire and building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of this project, including the site design, building elevations, parking circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project, as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner which will protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Minor Exception (Section 17.03.060.D.2) That there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code due to the physical characteristics of the property. Tenants occupying the project after construction will have several modalities including MRI, CT, PETCT, and regular x-ray equipment. This type of equipment has installation space requirements that have demonstrated a practical difficulty in the Rancho Pueblo medical office buildings located on the east side of PDO -6 with regard to ensuring the equipment and HVAC ducting, fire sprinklers, electrical and data lines, etc. co -exist. The extra 3'-3" will alleviate this difficulty. The Minor Exception does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. The Minor Exception does not grant any special privileges to the applicant. This is because other property owners with similar circumstances may also apply for a Minor Exception. In addition, staff has determined that the Minor Exception is not detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. The Minor Exception places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties and does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone. The Minor Exception does not negatively impact the surrounding properties since it is only comprised of a small increase in building height. In addition, the Minor Exception does not permit a use that is not allowed within the Professional Office General Plan designation. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing YNEZ RD co LU LLf PA12-0226 & PA12-0227 DE PORTOLA RD GABRIELLE Q LOPINGIP 41610.00010 4'r OWNER/APPLICANT: VICO 0MMOP 0000. MA1. 0.0006 1210060, � • uc 104 0(00. 00 02714 1 (q0) 092-0.102 • (W) 1*2-1210 \ 208 1.00.06 _ f - ARCHITECT: "... PM 10.1 MI* WIZ POO •-=.7:',- -i = +mss- _ ` �� WM 0[34 4 WM _ r (WV 701-200)- \.- ` _ 4K � f MI 001- TAltyoe_ - - b. M 1E 201.410.00 APPROOPOM \0 fI VICINITY MAP. NTS HIGHWAY TO SOUTH. NTS HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH le....4 x-0VIOII o.... -Ont 74.91 O 90 • 0063(.0403 0 •04)76.27 00 AC4W bRAPHIC LEGEND 555511552455.50.5014.55. MIK MUM OIL MO. OR•AOLYPW5OIP4[ 93610000( oc06 00(02 NPI PLGOECMPL AAA LOP.. OX *MCP PAP. MALE. .000130WOO .OA 1II4E AMO.M7 WY. KIM. KMMI VIA POMO OCCCMAP910O000YA010O14 1.1,2060 PAMPA.: 0(026002069 PALL. 01 • MCrGEVMEI 40IOACYOE SAY" P SITE PLAN 05.5E:4.384' 1 4 IK0AADPWHM3 • M N 10 PROJECT DATA AIx: 10I -m-001 AMY/ PµLYY141[• 0M •443201 IIJO0MA . CALVIN. MOM I PACCULA 055•51, 7[9(02020.011004 400Y IMC(( 7. 7MCR YM 1011 IDYL 420 204 2)1. 4.a i 40 00 M 04 Ott 6 900004 010Mp0* ro• / ODOM (0710 000.2 1400 1040 00 OEW01gk P 09740 10004 3140 451: 606210 603 um 0004 0600 00000 914) PAM 230.312 Si 120 ACR] MCA* /0040 00024 . 1j.2012 1 1311111 40*4.L 014711 Sr. 10102 MO 741 01010 212030 Si. WTM W000 AKA (2 *7606023 31110 11. 900 Nis P A4M0 AA09 MAROSCAPE AEA. INO0CAr4) ARA'. Oi914): 1020244 AOMN4h 0, 02021 AKA 27.00 1i 6.310 10 2107 6,403 1 =3801 SI P AIRS. P OOR AKA 23.010 V. 6.0 9.900 4'L 6.00 Sr. (44(011 usury WM0 • MA 1000,2 P5AA00 0. 9'42/100 Sr. 6 00•. 210 720290 5441 0100110 101 us rr20q 15 S 0 AMMY 0 044 74001 MA 410 9.000 MIL). 920 MEM f30.M2 sr 210 I,AII. 0006000 0.01910101 0 410( 6 001075)5)00 MK V 1101.7 90308410(0 P.M N4 ME 910120 040M0 NAS111 YAW 40.112017045 7q1 40 • 00 0 6 5AM2 60060.100 ro ELSTMO MK* maw 41*Y O SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: E4 NA1001 YA1 0114[ 1LL 306 0 STA1•I Taal 0410 220001101 MM 6 /1090. W 11201041 DAN 6 PAWL 0306161 006144 0M1sL20.26 4*�1 rr2120 M0L NO 201000 3C5W9 O 02 E31 OOIPI 406 491010 MIA W0 090AAOII 90 0460.04 10•120110113030.02 Q00020 0107040 *3604024 • ftp *01* 01300 006.O1r AKA 004040 OOK 4141 UMW 2104 00 90 941 Y -Y MW 100000 WO WA 1:1001230 •000 Ki 04* 246402 w avrp -... 11. .0 FIs: 11 DESCN10Gf4 DATE: COS 50064101 71115120)2 circ OESIRANITAL 03/01/2013 CITY INSVOIMRAL 03/03/2013 Mara 141.411.,141.411.,1 *VR2 AVR15100405: 12025 CLIBR: AGENCY: DRAWN: CHECCW: CTE1T.1-- 744420 A1.01 LANDSCAPE KEY NOTES: ERBF Of WOW(TINE 0 PROPOM UE SB OFFSET FROM NIOPERrc UNE SIIOHHODISTNGVEGETAIIONON ADJACENT PROPERTIES * EASINGIB0160NN0 TREES MINN to IENMEIERCf EAOPERIYI7YPSYM) EASING RKRODOM SCRS YEGEIA1p11 TOREJLVI INP ACE(TYP SW) O ENSINGYEGETAPON INOINIEL TO MART NftACEITYP SYN -UADEO- © 10'1, WEARY AREA IMCOSMLCIIONIAUCMMVMSCMBM I.MMO, TIE MINIM AREAS 91,11 MELO SHIT%IOW OI DEIECTARE AMMO SURFACE IMUNCATER DRBSHMSYNq O LI TSOL1AA0i(1W00I ©LJ 1f POLES(TWSYLS MANESSI DI ECICPY SION.f ® WMR%3 NIDE INSONRY SFATWALL• SEE ELEVA1OlA 111.1 ® BMX DERDaNDC SIDEWNN OO 1,4 IalLNDNAPEDREA6 TOY:SEEN PARR.. FROM SIREEI YEW ?AERIC ACCESS WALKWAY O SCREENED E14101pE BRfAAIAEA ® TerSIRFNEED'COBMEI PLANTING O YBKMAR SOU LIES O GEAN09OM PULIC=MAU M PIINSAS LfMM2STANME IRON ME Cf GUAS Or BELDAM FWE1ER NIITO4NCE SWOP COBBLE O RCN:LERMAIrcRCA1 OF}) ® BEEIMIION BLEACH HYPSYIN•SEE CAL DRAMSGS © N PAPAW LOT TREES REQUIRED -El PRONSED IITPSYM) O O SIRES TREES PROWLED• I PER'S FEET SIREEIFRDHF(E © HYORCSEE0 APNFD TOGRADW AREA OF DEER NG BLv14 SYMIE FOCI EACSCII CONIRM • RVOILIEO/LON SLOPED PEALETER • NONNDLAIED.RAIN \\ PROPOSED PLANT LEGEND: PROPOKDPLANTSATERML: CITY. 1 % / SOE AllW00100tLMVOW WHO 100. fM•I9.. SIM EM00 E00101 111 MOOR11.R0 • eM•rr 0.0••••• O 10100 •11WNIN lm 0000 ilei 000 0 .0•1001 0000 00.01.00 007001:0150,00 OPEC 4600.0.0 t1,. 00.001 4..0014 (Y �. ocean .0PAWN M0.00 aw004• •MN00.Ms. 0W 000 0 1M000•00.00001.•wy10.11,100w 0.00.0 111.1.1•11.41•111.0111.1.1•11.41•111.011.•rwNnA. .MYMan 0011000010:000100.0f 101.0 20011, Ca• . TO' -0100 -/ P 0100000011000.1 4,1.' 10.0000r101.0010 CCLaRM BYVUM DINANNI011Mw Sae }M. /0•40.C.03, 00/00041.0. 0000000 T.M 000.001010000,00 0.001,100nR100Nma Y•MJ .A. OM.B.. .0.0:020 Iw000100.00I11•0* 1,01.000•10MIN1 0100000100000100 RP14. 1'.00 0w 00.1000.. IW.M 10.00.000 t% M111PA1®NY01100R0 10040•10,0•60.300014YY190 Nom.. •. 1.00s•• 106.041 110 U.N.for ,000. wNo` 11IIMt IN'F. 70•••1,0.. MI1N rM Ff MM 700• Y.. se IJINea If & Gawks. M' anat.. toe 10110 0.1001100 0001 N 11M0tares. '...110 0. 10II00A It OAL 000.10. 103•-1►. 01 001,10.4 0 ,10100 10., 'NLY11000. 711.'K 1100 0 101 0 01 I ARD PROPOSED HARDSCAPE MATERIALS LEGEND: J1.aLATINO NONODI GUNO TREES TO RIWVN NAC FR! TEMECULA p - - _ _ � y Y aEe (pUBLlC R �!M'AY; 000 V000.400 Wee 000 1* .00.0.40. VSOMR00Ni0TMNM Saha 3/0.040C. [ 1 rRVrwocu rvnFYI rIILYV.7 I.CI.C•rvv: 3,03.0 AM DTABLES WITH W CHAIRS, TEAK IANDOCAPEFORMS NELLSPRINO COLLECTION TABLE. MELLSPRIND DINING TABLE. FREESTANDING CHAIR: WELLSPRING CHAIN, WITHOUT ARMS 72' BENCH WITH 2 LANDSCNEFORMS e INTERMEDIATE MMS. TEM WELLSPRINOCOLLECTOR BENCH. re L. IF H. WITH INTERMEDIATE ARMS. SURFACE MOUNT NP BENCH.TEM MNDNJVEWORMG G• IELLS%LMO COLLECTION BENCH.4It L. 3. H. WITHOUT CENTER ARA 3VRFACEBMUNT LITTER LN DICAPEFORMS WELLSPRING RECEPTACLE. TEAK COLLECTION. SURFACE WONT. 'BRONZE U0 COLOR 4TH CONCRETE I ED LIGHT MAYNE TYLER. • ROLLMD WITH STRAIGHT 611E 1209LEDINIMLED• 'FRENCH GRAY ACM EIC. 120V.W13.331MAU8017 CONCRETE. 'RRONQ E SHADE LIGHT POLE MO' ARCHITECTURAL AREA UGNTNG 40 HON UCL. UNIVERSAL LARGE (120 NOLMNG SCALL ANGLED M000. SLA 17 POLE MMS. BCI BASE. WE1AIO BRONZE' ?CAPACITY BELE RACK. LMDRAK.'HEAVY DUTY RE 1144ROOND MOUNT. CHALLENGER' BRONZE COLOR IDS•'#P •'BRONZE. COLOR a IP 11 D IOQAr- lRp.1TI131 ©LA 003CR▪ R� OESGRPIION: GAIL CRY SUIMRIM II/15/2012 CRY RESUNMTAL 02/0112013 CRY RESUBMITTAL 03/29/2013 CRY RESUAMINAL 01/03/2013 0 Z 0 J 2 MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING hasCII.Adlit AVRP STUDIOS: 12023 CLENI: AMOCO. DRAW CNIECI10: MN MTV 00000,0 W OIC I RM, 10011•00t L1.0 GENERALNOTES 1. TIE LNOSCAPE NLN IS SIE REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO 01161CONST CTCV DOCIABITS FCR C0IRETE SOOPE OF WO W 2 ACRE COIEENUWANY SITE EMU/AY/MUMMY LO ABMS Cf L EASTNG611E0111IES.N LODTG WATERS8WBl 41A3AHN HEC IR2 MOVES. FLAOCROTIEAMSE LYRA ALL LOCATCNS AND NDICAIE UTILITY TYPE 3 GRADE SOF IOBRECI GCFMDWAIERAWAT FROM BMOIGAD NEW A004130N 4 LOCATE REUSE BPI ATMPROIFD GINTE LOCATIM OOMMACTOR MALL 013PoSE OF ALL SITE REFUSE AT CRYMRtOJED LOCA16 6G 5 411 RD:MED PLANING WAS SMALL BE COEAEO WITH MIACN TOA WYIN0EPM0E 9 INCHES. EJCLLOING SLOPES PEGAO1CNEYEGETATIONNO WAS IO BE PUNTED VAIN GGUCCO4ER ALL E IPOSW SOO. AREAS Yfi RKCE1M66I SHALL ALSO BE NICHED TO 1 H WARN O&M 6 ALL 4EOIlMW IREES SHV L WYE AT LEAST OBE WEIR DEFINED MRF EAW SWVL NOR:WMMYATTNN A MANURE HBCRIANO SPAM OF AT LEAST 15 PEET. t PROPOSEDTMACAPROSNAll.IgTCONIXTWTN1011113NUDF3. B FR O$EDUTSNM3 SHALL BOTO NFUCTWI1U6 OSEDUFEISCIAC E TREE ROOT BAiRBIS SHALL BE INSTALLED MERE TREES ARE PLACED NUM S FEETOf RINK I41FACHE BITS NCLUOEAGWALKS. CURBS OR STREET PAVEMENISa4N1BEPLRJCNRIOVFMBITS/AE RACED AOYCEN7 TO 0.411/10 TAMES INE RCOI BWOEAYAM I9911YR4P Mule ME 15001 BVL M. MV6BMJCE ALLPLOUIPEDIANOSCAPEAREAS SWAT BEW44U4lED BF THEO*IER 13E WOSCNE PAPAS 61441L BE 'MUM -0 FREE CF DEERS ND UTTER MD ALL RANT A4TEP1LL SHALL BE MMTABED N A.EALTHY QIQMGCCIOINCM MEMO O1 DBD RNR MATERIAL SALL BE M1190C10RLY TREATED ORREPLACED PER THE CON:IRONS OF NE P4N4T. 11. TIE PBAMFTEECR SINSEOLBO ONYER SILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE 14NNIF1444[E Q ALL WOSCAI MAa0IEMI N NE R04111 NAY. 12 ALL UJDSCAPENO AMADMSNVl 00100R11 TO NE aTY CF TEMECULA'S WACO, CODEaWNVE OESKNOUOERES NO ALL 011ER CITY AFD REOCNAL 31A/CORDS 19 ALL ROMPED UWSCAPESHSIL BEMNNNIW NAGSEA4E WED ANS TITTER NEE COIDI1CNAl ALL 11SLES BEANIEP44J1 G R'FOPFNO'C*T6@E4 U NOTPERMI1ED LMESSSPECRCNLY 1OhDN IRIS POUT. 14 NW MOOfCA710416 OR C1WGES 1011EZNO5GPE PINTNO EA67MG0(1 PRCPOSED R/JII wRNM1 S PERMITTED PROADW RE PLSLLiNO 1A242RNEM1I3 TME I1Ea4145E1I4OF ALL IPPUUBLE ONNVICES W. MANY REWPEOLMO504E(I2C6I *4NS16GOR5EWRAN16C3.WROSCAPE LVOSCAPE FEATURES. EICJNOICATW ON THE APPROVED CCMSIRUCiCN DOCNBR RAMS S BAWLED CS MOVED DIRBG OFJ4a111CNORONSTRCI10N RSWLL BE RBANED AMOR BERME° NAND NO EQAVALBIISITE KR ME APPROVED DOCUMENTS TO TIE 4ATTSFACIM OF RIE DK&CPIEM SERVICES DEPARTMENT YMINN DAYS OF DANCE OR FINN ITSP(CRON M INENE S NO SUBSTANTIALNCETATCN ON THE COSTI40 SIR 11.10 S 70 BE HESERVW.Y*M TIE ETCEPIIO 4 KINEVEOETANON M BEERSIJGVEGETAIW CIW6EL*)/a16 TO BE PROTEGEE/ NPI/CESS SSROANIa4 71E PIM THEREWJDER G INE 941E1S MBE MANED NO GRUBBED KCMG DENELOPIEMT. 67 Cr� • 0 .2, •M L• 1. AU FINIT943AREAS SHALLBERAIG0TED B/AOEDICA1ED.BACIROYPREV9IEDNAGFICM SYSTEM DESCIED FOR RECTAEDWAIER AC4310NG TO MVO TYPE WORM.* AND 13041011L911N EJWISUREAIO WALL REPSVEIMPoRIIWA1ERONEWLE DYNEMS Of APCFIERCFHL( AUTO N1CILLYOCN1RC UED. UECIIBCNUY /CRATED. MX1401000 PPW SPRMIER MEM FCR WATERCONSEMAICNND 10 WAVE ER061a4 STATE OF 7IEN T1011 P034 11A1CN RATE 9MHNEREQEPIENT MBA REUSED NRFYI'CN IMAM PHI33W11 BE HC MASTIC (TYPE 11201 CLASS 515 MUSICALE PPE NB LATERAL WE RANG SFMLL MEDIAE 46 NOOPRESSUE PTE PRESSURE LUES 91011. BE 19191/4140 14' DEEP. NONPRESSURE WES 12. DEEP. A 1A4S1 ER VALVE ND HOW SE/60R S W L BE DOTAL LED TOWNIE DAMAGE N 111E CASE OF A VALVE FAL411E OR WANE BREW A SEPARATE NOSE 91M4MNESWLLMERLSTALLEDUPSIREALCF THE 164,9T84 VALVE 40 EACH IDSE IIP S1*1.4 U RTTED WTMNIAIMDSRRACWCU MBEAAER 2 NLPROPDSWIR A1CNSYS1EY5YALIREINAPPROVED ROI SE/SCR SHUTOFF MIX 3 STREET TREES LOCATED N THE RUCK Rat 1OF WAY SHILL BE NUG41 W BY A 1p1EQME1NUD(D ND MIMED DEE A1ERN .LOWAVIME TAMER. STREETPW46ERS 91W4TWE 24•LJIFAR I014O113IO4. ROOT CONING PANDERS INSTAL LEO ALONG ITER IEIOETER F ALL IFOGAICNWLL BE DESTS1f0 TOWELZW OVERSPENT COROWRAIGIRFA9. WALKWAYS. BUMOOCS AM FOCES DRAINAGE_NOTFS: t T1E00.41N1.0E SYSTEM FOR 1I13 PROJECT SHV! BE PRYAIENOMLL BE SUBJECT TONPRO/AL BTU* C111 2 All. DEYELCPWM5114! BE CONDUCTED TO Magi! ER0 AMIDSTOP SEOIBITNOPOLNANISMal LEAP C INE PROPERTY 1011E141 MNEXTEMPPACICIAE 1 ALL VOCE DRA MND MSWG04 SHALL DWI P000VRY INTO BORBECNTION. NFITWipNNOCR 310191 DPNMLE SYSTEM, SURFACE RUNOFF SIWL N3TOPNNONECMLY NTO TIEADXINNGFROPFRTY. AND Ca61RLCICN RUNOFF NAY MDT DRAW M0 THE S10MAWA1BAOONYVA CE SYSTEM LANDSCAPE LIGHTING NOTES: 1. TIELNOSIAPE PALL FE GBRLY 10314) 5R®BY BE USE OF UP1101lTS ON SPECIMEN TREES ND SELECT ACCENT TREES 3 II1EF 91 AREAS OF NELANDSCAPE WRL6E RECTUMS Of AT1WCR1EUGHT SCUMDSMATCHING ME MMRCI WL STELEOF NE BLEI16p. 3 11EENIW443E PEOES19WlW41JWATS IND GFMMETMEM MEM YAL BE UT FOR SAFETY AND CONVENIENCE BYARWCTIVE UGH POI ES 95141OI4OINEARCHIECRIIN SRIF CF NE BMDIHS 4 NLL13,2206S1421LBE51E1DWTOMIMEGMEUGNB3NOOPRGRCPWTES. 7. ALL 110111/40 SNVU BE 115 IAIE91. IglER1:30lC( TECHNOLOGY. • 4 2) 0 %' I.Y. ....7i, fikVINFUNIWCIMPLIF1471111M62 dr/ DESIGN STATEMENT THE WIDSPIPE EMISIO ED TG1 MS MEDICAL CKICC MULNN6 CQNEAWLL RESPECT TIECHVIACTER Cf 1ETEOM3 TRADITION. 1091A1L'EA11 001MN01,011E FEETNGWATEAmIEEMYG WORTS 1160.01 THE UTE OAYAAEIY Cf DROJOIO•T0.E1UM. OP/IF1610AL RM1N3AWRO TNIE TOMB113ITERIWENI CUNLIE PASSERSBY FFIDKSIR)RSMMt ENIWY MAY10I4100 TOGTUEDNO COLORFULMN1EG5 AS KU AS ENNVICEDDIS.EN'AYPAYINGNDMOHABNN WOMEN TREES GE/AIRED Agate N4 ACMEYN1ER RANEE TALL STREET TREES WEL WOE 111EIE413FANC PI.EIC MC EWNR *TEE WED MEFNS NA ON W EN 1N RN191031411 SCAM RIE PAVING FROMGUUL STREET NEN AND (RCI NDE Fa4AC01PG441A*U EEOESI112141 FROIEIDE ilf NTOUDRIVVDOP/JE SWAMI%N000M IMENT$ DIE B*ENCS*17HDOGE IRA THAYEAEVATOCOLOATIA. RMIJAW NE N 111E6EDRENIVENI PID WATPACa1RRM/311ELE O C4l6EEI/YAA0SG043202MY 61INIEDNINEKKPSIINWE 110511/400.SEU4O6RSTCRY 1IA0NGS TIE LOIN WOSCAPE EFFECT VAI BE OE Of EAVFO II VIAL ND ALCHIECTUN. COIC16ATY. CUPABBUTY MINNE SURRO QNG FE:i6a643C0 CO6fORT FOR INE FROPERTYSC11BITS EMPLOYEES AIOPASSBUBY. NAPA CCe4CCRIWCE WITH 111E CITY OF IEWCUAS WAWA CCOE COYAMOE D[SKN G.VELES. AW THE PACITSPUEFLOPLWEDOEVELOPIENROh1WY MLWOSCAPE*RLI*MNNIANW BY THE C*1ER MINIMUM TREE OR LARGE SHRUB /IMPROVEMENT SEPARATION: IMPROVEMENT MIN. OISTANCE TO TREE OR LARGE SHRUB TRAFFIC SKIMS DWVHVAY'STREET IWAIN NTERSECTS41 CRIB/ POLES BRE HYDRANTS / SONO ME COLIEC11NS ORA4WAT EDGE O011VATBL5E1111 SEW -MATERNA I60EBORCUD URIW UES FIRST ROYOF ACCENT TREES13E11N0 SEAT WALL MAI WW1 CUOwrrOZESTAC OOKE MIT KWOf MICRO 61/MMBBPO BEAT YOU RAO PAM II 6lR6KE OSEAT WALL di ENTRANCE IMAM! SCALE SI'. ITC 20/4E1 1014E1 ;Oita I(EET 5 FEET 51EET 01(ET 5 FELT clAINIAMX 11011021 DESCRPDON: DATE' CITY SMARM. 11/13/2012 CRY RESU6AYRA103/04/2013 CITY RESUNAIIAI W/2J/2013 CRY REOUL'AITIN 01/07/2013 Z 0 1— U << CIL I— O=� H a Z 5 w O� =�U w Z O ,T.:0`1. ce OaO U 56:_ 2 i F)W Z 2,.»c AV. 6NCYJS: 12025 CLIENT: AGENCY: O PAWN: CH6CUO: pN BBITII� II CCNCVN41.LM01CNi,1D:u L1.1 ,10001 10011.4 1010 C•11.17 MO mom O \pT�jf rpm \[ql Nro an.xllrw PLOTTABLE EASEMENTS: ❑A 10 MOOT O NI131 NO Mark 7110. A11116611.111 00441 Or 600110. _ 3333 04 1113 13110 16. 101 Cr 0,11.11.10:0101 ® 1•111•61 W WW1 - MOM. ROM. 10 101)0 t/1100N mM 0111411. ES= 101)8 11.1471 13301 .0 1t 10-1190 Cr 3101 I6001 © Y GOO) 101 11•1110 NO IMMIX '1l0 1 e0 3 000010 010 10 Mu I O1 00 10 14a111 ®10.3 0/011. 0010101 n• 4111 © MITNIE 10171 3 NACU NO COM 10 0• /M 9•E 1013! w0111.1)Q1r11OW. 0130.3MAIL N3001100 114 (M 1100-0927 /000 lad COMM • 11,1006 700; 1044 11001 101101131OL1.0 0141) 3 PAM MP ��� 9w1 6 M3 1 3310. 1010 1101014 3 NOM WM LJ ,� 04;9131) ISL 1 A 11111 WM. AMISS 07 00 *A•I.ar 10 100/4) 3 3764 10006 =Mr WILCO= u! u 1000 14 111101.1111 13 13} 1 Cr 311)1101041 K48 ENGINEERING, INC. . 87M11r . M1•NO 71113/! Ora..tYw 1444101M (411) 114-1545 fee (0010 2,4-5711 111 •r p,0y•/ W 311110.1 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR HALCON ROJO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING V)CINIlTYu MAP A 21:--- isLlll 0100 ONr 2:CDOIL.C=C ICU 1311 11 0111 • 011317 Ot'o • 0 4* AL 404111 1300144.11'0 Mel hr 001 .74001 11001 001 n Am30t 11 sawnO. I7 3103 11111 .41---1-1.11-111. 1.. ..1h.r• 011.4.'.13 11.I ...n I •C MOW 0••••4. 1011 a •. PC 111 len1111. 1.0.1 30 110004.. t1•[ ( 0171 arc Y 01,* JTI 41,0, 11.3••0'111 �� '0.10•13 MS I-1 - f - 0- 0141 J L4.O 311.4 131410111 1I411rtl•__- IOW 101410 10!311111. 10.01'0 1001.1•11 131 11110 Cr M. ac. w Of 11 WU Agy_ sm.fl*. _MEHL 1.01110 CM= 0310 (1110 8013 0,06 • 11014 Now POW •N. -. 031030 6e1.(0 3 nos 11013010 711. 07.10 OVUM 'cram 10 030 013 713 0-0 1813134 11.066 1' 0010 or • am 714 44 .. J3 1313. - PIN1 110 800 1,11 1.46 MIME MO Orr ... . . ... 401 O 1084 3310 013 113* MON 1111 0011, MUTE N3 uor NO 133. MIME R 001331 . SAL 4FAA . 11.E KM amt i 1-11 OWER/APPLICANT 1.1113 1106.114 S OLA O ,II 101111- 0/1 0 10 -(hall Pi 1e -i EN) NEER 1300 13 WO c30 01110. LI In 11 .00 0 1. PPM No 13-•1 11 6111313. A.P.N,AEOAL DESCRIPTION. ▪ 11-•1414 NY 1 aSC= nMel r r awl a Mu l rl 10.'I1 ▪ Il ni aula~o MAO NM 4113 141411 301A 0111 n 13 MIR 141 Y 0.11111. 114,113 7100%II1eA 10 OMi 34.41-10111' WO. Will EOURCE CF TOPOGRAPHY 111. O4•.rt •711. • IX RAN w =Man1-r 1013!• 1101 n W�//uu-UPIMMIN. IMO. 14 )80 /1•i[111. (EARTHWORK OUAN11REE 01.61. 101: 16110!. 41141 011431 111 40 1310 1101 1.3 11 6•.a ant 1010111E 13 /mug 11333 oat Conceptual Orating Plan HIALOON ROJO MEDICAL ORTCE EK1CDP 0 CITY OF TEMECULA, CA 1 3 2 C • NCEP UAL GR : Y ING PLAN FOR HALCON ROJO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING / _.fit. - -- - - _ 'ra: av_-- - - ti 0 PARCEL PM 3OB•E 211/114-46 APP •i1-Opo-oo✓ "s9 4.95 0ac ao rwala 6; �b.b 04,0 lKa8 ENGINEERING, INC. � Olney�>• ..".01..".01 • 1111 110060 1:00 50.00 1b 4.1* Wb - T (111) 714-5715 feu (N►) 2H -M _ u,� K aroOArty+ OV WON 1 MMLII STATE aHIOFiWgY �'98Ot/tH 0.0 MAO o- 1� fyr ` 0,70/14 «•400( 40rol "p 1 "lglrl O WA 9Qr 0=0 b 0n W b 00 IA-1� dirt. ——.- Q aRApRt MCNIa• Grv&RWrtH CMAFJ4bMRN CMMS.YRu q©Aid n•RL'f�:01 HALCON ROJO ARCHITECT 19015 CLIENT AGENCY: owxorr PERSPECTNES A1.00 OWNERFAPPLICANT: avr• J 1.111011 1011 MOM ,....,... n arwe u<.�: 'mal r SQluuc.n '. —,111,01% 0.11 1 A10"11.4.1 MATERIALS LEGEND oo ••f •f = MEW! MORI e 1�j1 041. OX00102[1111ae00011YIM rcl9alnM�. ® OWROo00110O1WJIFNIORM1 W /M MB 101e�'Mn4llwLPCPRI OVR4H• 1001.111 ® /4•41%lWM101.91CW�11R01”:401 ... y" 6 % 4 V111 s } _ 101.0.1.3104R 111.10110 • ® wOOD/WY . MY{O10W1O11MI101. ®Y.W91000• 1111111119.0114.111[14010.01�/L ® 6gMIVOIMS1d114.0310pn00AIYMM CaIRWIIIWPOR COM ®T4wwA>s1 a CM II. �a ® 10.101111.1L°O" oema1_. 1 WWINOGEMRi011 /YROR1111BW11141 IO1.0XCA ,f_I X%hYY%XJ%%%X%h%%X%%Y%YX%..7CXARXiIY%Y.iXXYX sr, ® OW �ew� O M1MX00CARR �, II/MY1“1•0 111 W•W M R YIIIL00NLLM ® MIT 1 TO W1OI Rd61OITSR1011 ® 1pp.1101Y1 ® 01041 CInA0014e FLOOR PLAN 1OT .urcONn10ua00MOw1 woln. 0110►Ipe an .7.11.01.4 langs. OrcN*.lnn. 0Am) pn.ralMlTw 7111 .svi //ii/vuiiiin wiiiiiidui./e:.1// ,,� or o i�/irJ,iiii/r/iiii�i//f/iiiiiiisu i-Vy% /// .X/• i U//UUU/liUiUU r• - 'o //U!/U//�4 zr /i/ / / 7/ // // / / / / 4' // /,ivUii/////i�! , - .^p. uu --I NORTH 1..0 EAST WEST WEST r;...„/U/,%///r/UMP' /454OW///UJ„../ U„h:, ///////U!i//J/J!/////U/!i +i///J//!/!////////!!/i!N//!ai1 �� XI It //!///////////.0////////i ` %///hY!/lr.U//4J//J4'////// :;" z/Z6�i/i%iii////1 ii iiiii • A• ii�/iu�i 1//�iiiii��iiii�i�iil/a; ••.w•.wwwww•.•_wwwwr>s wwtw•w .• •+. SIN sw.bw•JA_•AL.•. s1.$ r+.wwwv_wssyd.www6•.w•• i;i y� • nA MANE TAN �•:w•:•:w•:r.•w:•:w• If.MAM•i.www•A�•FX s.•.•.ww•s :1.•.ww•.•sA.NNAs: "MI INNTN wars. FLOOR PLAN / IRAN NAVY/%%///iii// ../7/// // /iii, SOUTHEAST rrrws auwaa lull - /oJii%iiiiiii%iiiiiiii_: / viuiuuii___ //////////1//////�////////1/11/1b %11///1//%//, 1//// / //.c U//////1///// 1 i%/%iii/% vuiuiuiu//..w • c..mu/ i/ vuuuuuuiiiuuiuiu• viiuuuiuu�iiiin TOWN ON NANO NORTHWEST SOUTHEAST NORTHWEST ELEVATIONS 0 ELECTRICAL EUIPMENT ENCLOSURE NORTHEAST //YAWN//////iu//liii/u/lulu/uiiiiiiii%% /ii/iiiiiiiiiiiii�i SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST SOUTHWEST OWNER/APPLICANT: m0SANNS*Ur['%i� rig. 0.•.10 NO., yam :to i •••: N•••• MATERIALS LEGEND O M nowt wow I ® au Iaaca .oamwes®caw wr o ® out mosoalerors.roaoawaw MU N1 ANNINNPAL NNW, WM.` NON furl ruurcRraswr usn•erccow, ® nAtrcNo00 MOW TO w+wwaBm OMNI I -r--1 r rwa *t r ImawwrTNrRN RNA CONN r, MOWNSKINa owrwauwr VPOT WON fel va.cuss l rani smOn10CD urawoaaananwSATA INONr N ECM csawrrusnmernEarAortonwoenscomon s$ mono worms:mum. VANINI•01 ® MVOMAIN NUNN Oaw ONINa000lw NNW suoarsuaAYAWN Nast rrrl NaiTIr i TO NMI N NI NorsmY Irl un.!c az NIT was 10109110NrAll avrr n?af1Yl yrnart SoILll )I l� asN wn• un 34.0•11. www• OmuurNrra MONO HALCON ROJO M ffTECT ANCHRECT: 1ms CLIENT: AGENCY: SAM NEMO W: TNaITN[ SITE DETAILS varanc TR A1.03 NORTHWEST Mnwa.n wuw FLOOR PLAN //////ll/////////// [.-ta `.1 /// ///// /iii/,/ SOUTHEAST TttK LCL) WOO i/j/iiiiiiil� 70// NORTHEAST ///iiiu�iiiiiiiihag SOUTHWEST ANITIMIL _MEL NORTHWEST ®TRASH ENCLOSURE NORTHEAST SOUTHEAST SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS OWNER/APPLICANT: rLrxww..M.TmwAA Va LNwGW�[�.0114 024100 MATERIALS LEGEND Egn mum want ® caul cma nce.um mcwoA lama ca.na COROC DMASI cwmwww ® MAC lwlnl0YWSICF GRAIL RCwC1.TM M1V ..rtVE wuro rorty 1,.1.811 nRAVIOMacm+maO ® MTIaa AA nwwTOI100.11 w.s.o WIW.IAaorTu 1 I[wuacMY%.2 Mb. OXON rel pcor4wA Cw KOUR.. [•gyp YwwlwA.,I rgPr7 EMENIMMI1131 I MEWL COI. IPPOW.00ww 44, auo.wlARlgwnwRlA WwAROMII MI ARAM ICRICSICOMINVIALVIIMIONIII ottOR. 'MMA1 `.. YAY11 WINVowa a rim MR IT01MTa4f1w19ROK[MA91 ren IO.CTo m na. I C1.a.ar•[ RyideiP r(aLive �''Yrt'•. , Irma soluboi 34A can. wnawrru 11, .... 01YFCHAYTI. .14,111d oTrnw..Lq {, } J m w 7 O rti • Lan o 4,1 :i y fill z McHRECr ISC.s CLIENT: AGENCY: wllww... SITE OETMS A1.04 awnscnc:.ORY / /Z iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii�i// iii? ---QSa7 /uu//uir/!////////r///////////if//m///////uu///// c•Jil SOUTHEAST uu/ ins# uv/// e • ") iiiiii � iii'°iii/ a,/��//iiiiw// c•-ro NORTHWEST NORTHEAST/ SOUTHWEST SOUTHEAST NORTHWEST SCREEN WALL NORTHEAST/ SOUTHWEST NORTHWEST SOUTHEAST SOUTHEAST NORTHWEST SOUTHEAST O SEAT WALL cr0 t1 NORTHEAST SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST SOUTHWEST OWNER/APPLICANT: ro)os ,cnrraamcau�ua on...tem am= .11/4102.100 Olt= MO MATERIALS LEGEND rffl must mown i MiLin au,ercor.00m encoOamwfu aueORcocaasw)sun=PIM/n GM mac, 611U013I11 ARORECRA OVICOO IB TOSNO/r NOM !WAG r -R-1 !WM IMAM us ruenc tuna ca. coma rri nnaroWpODWOaO WW111.1.eL mwtd N))OfOc) Ill a M•1110 )Me, RICAPOaAYnemama. r91 un cu caf«ovaaCOAwrucfu wOxown • Avc .1..00CCP'auon,iunA ana Gia, CO1°" 1'e6rI WIPPIPeecee,om 13NVAA"IMAMPc1pCO w,°AOR lal a aunnAsncn(114.A.0 csoeaaravnrouc OM PIM IVW)pmarrow aranw rwtnl macre, rayl Oda )41lInO rs Pu i 5 rt SC/Wilt)! IS. ARCHITECT: 112025 WENT: AGENCY: �n uif snTnfHr OREOETAL8 KAMA Al .05 NAM suis Ai km t solo itoil,, ---- .o" Tib"` ` �-17.11>; ---1 4 ill' illr" __• i. i j .,r. {y 15 I I 4 ft O. G,•\ 1 Co •o 0 [p F Pi. I 1 e >vm-zr I r • • ■ i * • t ----- _.._s:� II����� I X. MRS 1a,owliu. are ttlY AMT. 11/1•1012 anr.a•uuA 114,1•100 I•T•:. 4 I UPI 11 it::: . __ • ■ • • • 11Eµ..•. LI Z., Ir - 4t. ...j ml i 02 L 10 S 0 lap tfi11 iii II i al Wim! n 1- �r< ,ra .. n> s. a •�� 11026 iAGENCY: 4.APCNITECT: COM M.1 YH I BU•OV 1 LEVEL 1noon PLAN f BUILDING 1 - LEVEL 1 MV ® 11.11716:111111- 0 A2.11 S.U(I •s wr rs rr nr r. (.IQJti'i• {(1" (1I)IL' `',I I •1 Ik111 .,,It11Of1'. t 1 � I iA _ leo a mraca•1— i b I I I % ' C•1[MRb 0110.X11 a1• f/flNMRK •••2.2 rnrwmw•nr e00.0 —.I✓ • • • •1 • 1 r. anwuurtr WOW. I 'I-1 , I es -k I I ••L• I maV k c ©•,„ f � ilii ) ?ii • • • • • II Si ZNIM } • • • • • M Da 8. DJ 5 o uk n 1!. 0p 0 16 IL F 01 O $ O M j L0°�W _V u W r. s = Z'nH ra as rr r. .... _ _ •a 1roz_1uutlu ,,,r ARC1BTECT. 1.^025 CLIENT: ADEHCY: BULDVO I LEVE'. 2 ftCCN FtAN BUILDING 1 - LEVEL 2 ;Y�! Sim murex 0 A2.12 0 avrp .i£!li lit!i. 21.11! ! iII aOleasrEF-- 3 t! # i�ji �2i I:ill l�l�' :! 3r I \ A 'iJ�ll lit # _ t 1 ! [Jill j.rfI' r,� , %r 3 .!, � •, Al 11ffi lid Illii ;; . 111 r s , .,. / • nl ffl:J I w Z a i�1ill 41 111 6 1O'01 WALL itIIIA M �IIs11.71���`i�lhatiltlith � ww.r w.. ' .•I1 °`soap n Y 1 14 j�Tfj,{} ifl _ �Zi�i � tt i �1 i�i. 0 Q N..e g !W! ! 1 IQ ANCNIYECT: +7015 CLIME: AGENCY: Y R 4EGGO W. I SUMAO t ROOF PIAN BUILDING 1 - ROOF PLAN ;!! n4..iG O A2.13 .. .. " " I'M • • • • • . := • • . _ _ :YIP ., ,---Z-- 11 i E ' i = f .._ ii µ r It. YT :.1.1 i a f f. CAS In 1 v TIti.. T s rain i•�• iccuvc.0 y._a 1 MMHG% I me I __.._.� • i of ...,.n. I: ..,... 1 El �a�s OM - -• - -, nor IAII i = I rnv 6T/11121.0.10M. 0 (5) - - „- , O L ti/ In _la� Li 1 11 NI 5 : a o :.. n, '' , , ii ; a I.H1 N CIL a a w � p od �.� er 41:11f E 9'1-r yr,-r-r� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 `.i1 1 111 ""„' 1 11T T- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 'HIM 1 1 1 1 1 1 n Z., i O :+ U = yF. j o 3 BUILDING 1 LEVEL 1 PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING 1 LEVEL 2 PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN ARCNRECT: I2025 CLIENT: Ir-r5, O 2 .. ry AGENCY: acoaosr: I lrnrm. OVLD240I ENLARGED PARTLAI 8000 PLANS iatNWtA A2.14 xixana arw.11Ce. arz an*•mut :want QfrA{YAIM:q WAWA, GAfAt•YrrAt •Lmf•f wazrnaxtera- ANCH•ECT: 1202: CUNT. AGENCY: MYTH. ONi9H BULCNO2 LEVEL ELOO. PL A2.21 IV �. .. H. ,. !' Nei I �x ;= i�l 11;1 . i'rI IVB 11 1 iI:ii1l .LI:.J 111I''4 11i1 .i.-.. :.......t...12.: t • • • • -1.A'=". N I • • • • M I 111 1 wpJ 1 "� 1 • • • • I a1 6 1 1 neAwAAe i ® 7 Ga D 1 w ••c ., p C> I a1 b a _ • 1 I1 i� I , _,. _.. ii.::.: _ - nH.mAwa.o: • liT 1 I 1• ``_.�'�1 � 1 II 14• I I .I I ' 1 ,,/{ I I3.7.31 W of I,! I "` ;• BUILDING 2 -LEVEL 1 �� p xixana arw.11Ce. arz an*•mut :want QfrA{YAIM:q WAWA, GAfAt•YrrAt •Lmf•f wazrnaxtera- ANCH•ECT: 1202: CUNT. AGENCY: MYTH. ONi9H BULCNO2 LEVEL ELOO. PL A2.21 NG •• n', i, rite n, i, f• 'b b • • • 1-1.7 -AY t- -C 1 1 e - i I I I I 1 I A 1 a' D I I I D a11 I I 1 II I .T ,J I • 1 —w L• I� a IO i, u. "+ UT/0BUILDING 2- LEVEL 2 YLJ CI,IUIO ) ! fea1IVC pop® ,11'111(1 sow;11 11' cacarta sada onu.nK ,n.•.0 O1YN.L0•nOl pOW.. anrtaw.rtK OWN. YR./2 r+...s AnliffECT: 12023 AGENCY: 8:1..02 LEVEL 2140011 MMI! A2.22 bII suIs 1 rC'.IUv! Of.upli• Sall %o Mont.. m ' :f :Il. •1f1!fl' : t':•1'f "", t jj 7. ltiff,:.. y t t 11111 {}f t • I.'fl1/.!ii2 1 . mt,renr�j; *"...cm. +`� '`7?71 1.11!1�1 O cA,., 3.f Z: fl (((j}(j((ji}}3 IllIk. iti311+� mmnw� 1f1'1J y '' 4 ..._ ..31.4.,£8 ..71 i. �� f' 7 '/y1111-11111 tF f t t CESCRIPttli We aniVBILMMTAI. bM<If OttPEp.VRAL 0.013 { ilf f3 .• I II' S !S bm IIEDECTIRJR- 5 1 i , , �` H .v 41;1111°. 3 w IS II ili: { 1 v1,�t 1 { ii r 1 Iit ' n41 i rJ ifj .• fs IIIA it. �t {`i1 'tltf „,,., , .ttr{ i ft Yf f 1 3'1 13 ; or '.{ 1. ALCOR ROJO IEDICAL OFFICE 1 1150 & 31170 TEMECULA EMECULA, CA 92592 . • 1 z .. ir. thi ARCHITECT'. 12025 r fi• t imirl q 11 il i� CUM: Lt •t :. ly 1jy�j;� i 3� �' cmoRn I • .1;. 1 I :; .3 7 I3 F'•• sn""� TWERRE dnERmERERYPIM BUILDING 2 - ROOF PLAN eswlA. O b� A2.23 S . S (.IC.\hive - pi•Q pk.. `tiidlf x)ullc m,. '- ;..-1 7.,,. 0 0 0 O p. , .. . S>.. I 1 y/.pAiW (I to j r e o G c�> o I.rI m 3 (0 C. 1 • ,.,01•11.111111, M O,;,k 3 _ a ti•E II - — -- . MILTIMN p i Y b E HALCON ROJO gial <' 4 p MEDICAL OFFICE BUI 31150 & 31170 TEMECULA PA ;, TEMECULA, CA 92592 171::=::::—"::-..;.; 1-.ri l it �III :...ri:.. `...; 7l- - --, 1 I ,er S - ', a - - - y :i+ ;/!1 1 i i !S i {{ !! I ! li ' ii I. ii I ii /s II 1 r- ]::: (- i ff .. .t- "-It•••tt..tt.. ..t ...E�...�i:..:..tt_.E:it::.::1.1::: -. -I '--' .4r----I ---- EI ..�... - I 'BUILDING 2 LEVEL 1 PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING 2 LEVEL 2 PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN 0 O .w.rr I 1 ,,,r" .000A0r4N01.01aR..1 ()BUILDING 1 - NORTH ELEVATION .n[OOUY.t COW'i —.11.0VowE114090a ..--ErYUOr10MM1[4f • • wMro.awwa.w. I.cu.l0wma —440.EI104 MOMTlT —115o5..TM u.lnr'mut. wln lWM60A R,. �RM.14rtaT.m nANN1110�ro1 - — fi LO W[Car4n ntvnow 4.4.4•41110.01, WIN (cnm rMIOMM /1BUILDINGBUILDING 1 - EAST ELEVATION —wtlEldH.YMOWrN1 vowa,ttnut r r wulan Mill - —�9 1, iO.� I1 - =9 574.49 u2111w.emwe— www.1. 91oa —11111WArOMQ .O...OVI... OWNER/APPLICANT: WNW. WAC.,. eu'E �i.R..uc MNarm uotrl MATERIALS LEGEND CKo FAMAS INOEn SWO WU 10Atw001INTTIMYNI' 0...0 GSM TANTEN 0a0O1001.wT00t01 W o (airwl v. IV OACKMCM41100JO3CCM TIMM ONIXeVO' rin Fumc.u.ml oenASIX MM. Tf... OC .11 ® 11W4mT0 .000.1111.43, ® SPAWN worm s..maoOAM11.4 N0o101 SICK/. 41An10 11.N01. 001040...1 a 01.1 I-41 rKNaw1 9V000IWI%COM IINT11.)01...1.11 m0A raylmoo mum :rrtmmoxceowomEcoaom «.E.1J071,1..NI..u.M. Mil von lrorTwaalvlw INVOA rchri WMC1.A ® eTa.lc mom mem a rrp WM carts ornuvinN �. OTY.lYn4 011110011111/1,4 0000.3 OttAeRaC14 MOWN I ARCHII ECT: 12015 CLIENT: AGENCY: 0[000111 Ou.D11A 1 ELEYA11p11 71ENTSIE1f A6.11 YM'OII I..I00'MRIIt..011.11.MIOpb IA11G.1NppW r. 1" ~SAW —t10 0 0111 0 0 1 M1U1 r.a+v.w ® cn e, -L0 fflI �i� . r c'i_____e—_ — ms#'—� MI Ell MIN MI NI IN I. 4.1 .., mu s ufla.C. w...nYana .--V10.4.11,1,4 .......1 ()BUILDING 1 - NORTH ELEVATION .n[OOUY.t COW'i —.11.0VowE114090a ..--ErYUOr10MM1[4f • • wMro.awwa.w. I.cu.l0wma —440.EI104 MOMTlT —115o5..TM u.lnr'mut. wln lWM60A R,. �RM.14rtaT.m nANN1110�ro1 - — fi LO W[Car4n ntvnow 4.4.4•41110.01, WIN (cnm rMIOMM /1BUILDINGBUILDING 1 - EAST ELEVATION —wtlEldH.YMOWrN1 vowa,ttnut r r wulan Mill - —�9 1, iO.� I1 - =9 574.49 u2111w.emwe— www.1. 91oa —11111WArOMQ .O...OVI... OWNER/APPLICANT: WNW. WAC.,. eu'E �i.R..uc MNarm uotrl MATERIALS LEGEND CKo FAMAS INOEn SWO WU 10Atw001INTTIMYNI' 0...0 GSM TANTEN 0a0O1001.wT00t01 W o (airwl v. IV OACKMCM41100JO3CCM TIMM ONIXeVO' rin Fumc.u.ml oenASIX MM. Tf... OC .11 ® 11W4mT0 .000.1111.43, ® SPAWN worm s..maoOAM11.4 N0o101 SICK/. 41An10 11.N01. 001040...1 a 01.1 I-41 rKNaw1 9V000IWI%COM IINT11.)01...1.11 m0A raylmoo mum :rrtmmoxceowomEcoaom «.E.1J071,1..NI..u.M. Mil von lrorTwaalvlw INVOA rchri WMC1.A ® eTa.lc mom mem a rrp WM carts ornuvinN �. OTY.lYn4 011110011111/1,4 0000.3 OttAeRaC14 MOWN I ARCHII ECT: 12015 CLIENT: AGENCY: 0[000111 Ou.D11A 1 ELEYA11p11 71ENTSIE1f A6.11 ..--111•111,...~44110111.1101u* gar;ENE W ! tMmf mmnitt 201.111010•211 —oa1wM OOS.Ia 1 asBUILDING 1. SOUTH ELEVATION 1 —IMX0It001MM --CL vWYow.oi�`.t In 10M WAS TY m qilhhI1lUUI1 . Iu IOU wnln40.09Z I, r Ilolnran • I. .---IlwOo*YLITP .O M 1 rLm ^� V 31110 1 WWI CffEl -tea , vs] 1NO.GNAn - �.,EEii��� '-4 t I�Ay�'FV O BUILDING 1 • WEST ELEVATION OWNER/APPLICANT: ImU,111eL10311111e0AA.0 QIA000.ER01 U0 PIM YINI. 1 ilR.IINY MATERIALS LEGEND ® 'MOM COC41E 1 1u1 OMI OeOlO01MSlSmt0M11tIE.b L'a 0.E0e:0111001MO114MC0101WC0 ramp m h n)MOncna 1a0000SVAINMIP ® 11AEncu1..E11IE,11n,.,I1111.•01.2,ltMUM WW1 MOIIIC PIgno,OM„MMAbtD r.n 11.411110W11111 if01/..A1111“ ff./L110:1.011 rRn 11Q61b1..V.IB11.01.0b100.IW NY.41 1140n1•11.1.0.1:0101 1-1 VO0101M11 ran /.1MOW411MI .1?AlylVIOp 11•31 ONO Caa1 ® 831.110110.111 MOQN WWNI1YIm� reirl o1MWOCpeM n1YM00t11>wwM • ....110.11 .NOe1e00rMT W E® 103Ale Mg E�I..,le1a.E.W..E 5LUU1�` c_Icauve •U)411 SO1It I1)11' vl OrIf11E9151/11At 0.1201, OIIIWIIYIIM 0.09011 n1 . 0 3 g IL 905 O — si, 3it °en - u me meyi oa" Wes ARC ITECT: a1ENT: AGENCY: well ammt� 0ULOU 31 EtEYADONS A6.12 OWNER/APPLICANT: A TE. PR*ral111<an MATERIALS LEGEND .u1s :_ ii. JU'C1 `'.01)1(.•. )I11.II I '.51111111111'. —... —_ v narawwwea mora0.00. _-------- oroaNnwuaraa roT.a\ _—... —... .. ROY rmmwMcws m:ounart —... —___--- *ARE.. - •- VFW.*WS.a\r(MMO --------- - nwV50 r Q., o.eoaoaann.nMw Nur. �W-I atforCCaoas.oraASToOIorWF.o ® rtsn .nME01..amowwaCOMMISVG. MR ®*MOMrer I�ennN014004 Teanawau w000rwAwirwamawraPArnw® (Irl Paan. ANNrocrn\.naNArn 110.01 r6-I6errerarm 1 rwweRoarmwiwu PAWN tumor Cola to 6, �y R, �.` �(( ' t ••" c'.M'• A r} ' or ald.. fIO.IMN .....042111.®\B..CUSAr � — {� MD rWm octal �OM� 03-F�ME R2 • RZS _ a: are a. n . -; >rr"4". r ®r*.°F nm.ranuw oc.*aro suzoatm TAMMbigOiMA.M. PAW.. FI MLi —' ---- - -— -— - — - —-— '�- --— -�—'-- --t�J� = ma nowraalwiaMama Q w.ctir 4 UZI was. MEM COMA _. . ,.fie r _ iT^ _ .. — _ ,� .S4'.br --> -T � "Rza ^ids""' lL • a� 'A :_. , oua►la art ar,11*MOr —:• anRFe11T11l t 03.0.1 _ oITMA1AttN OVNl.i - - — - — - - — - _ _ _ _ - _ _ IqQ��//,�g] ����II _OIt@iY9@! cc//�p�� Q�y� �jf�111 ed�l� V®o-Yo®o - - - — - RIVMSONMX - Ifl—; mI® �1 \riOCplrrtl\TAOYp(l. r_ am — —161'.$d �A 0 Lam 65 MEI I. -11 13 IE_ MIMS, .M1:1 II 1761 :: ! !al_ 1TRosrtsuvN+o\+xau 5 :169 _ _1 Ii f I I • 1 �I i I le �1 a.uR yr wnr..x o .1. R' . 11 5.._ RSr�c zs i O BUILDING 1 .RCCOrroMAAINe • PARTIAL . 146 .1311/ EAST ELEVATION YIAVIoorpprrllOcaow � Rartwmi 11Ilti m z 0 e 3 w. i O0 0 4 —•B 4 °sw =• a - : h INaln rr. .1 II* I MAN a ARCHITECT: 12025 WENT: AGENCY: f I 8iSG1" 5 oIMS1W. I Da\rmll SUAAINO 1 EALAROLO PARTIAL ELEVATIONS b.rrw.Ie, A6.13 11100%, •. 1/000O11o00.a OWNER/APPLICANT: Obl IOW WM E0.0A 110 i ° OM IGO.■OO.W 'vi.YLno a■m 4/1010100 11101011410» 1 (wove pt.0 '1 L'. If 11,111 St1 U1+ 115. KK {W 1 0POWS 1W.n lta�`01 aMM11.0/131V --- - ----- 1_$.71._50020) Wt..01.00• W. 1.110%01/1011W0 10.0210...11 --------------- forswunLM tail •110:0040 0001.0011 ------.>-19tl74.9 4 MATERIALSLEGEND ® 01.1.00.0.111 - — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OW momoo 11N iwocc 0a woo -.-c.ai-.-.- -.-.- -.-•-. c•<f ....A M.- ,. ---.. .-F'S._.._Pi'' 1 ` . PUEOfCO■OY15wOT■Art(AtO.WIb ® rmwaanwi01000ncnra raoawaowvr ©RAf1Cl.MI1A 1fRnA0KLIcfLatlM.1a0d1 l naA»orowrc«rAlnSlaer�nerenama. �,r*-1 '• 100. '!Pr. A ws V101 — _ -NW - - — - - ��— - �d._ - - — - - — - -*iii • t •' 000.1.11,0011. 00.01.10010 *WWI 10001. CAM t>. Gn`�e�01•10.1 � s 9 am 115/010.55 1 LrJ °use■ WWII 100/1171.-- 0.m — ■_f ■.o — --_ I 1ic _ _ -.,..a- — �� mdsYoo"sOMta°�"iw [7Irtw�nasw.mnrcawosoan mw.w uaonae�oen.ovnnwnaYwnlwao. ® >11Fwoaa 1 -� R _— _ __ 1liwrtranymawnnimpowt .lw ■:o re:// / .; 4 c'y 'I/ �� _ - —. -■■ . - .. - 6 0 ! f'Tl nwrlrowla.naocsAlNrarpul ®i 10101cal ® 1110. 111.1 i l■1 — - - - — OBUILDING 1 • NORTH ELEVATION 9 »„»1/111. 00.0•10/ OW 09/001/1 00121/1 O11.11.110U 410014 1% nrtii 10100 WOW w0wO010111tl ... 10.111010.011 ... n001■w naOnadwa00»!17 reaSiMoviOrel —100[raos.~1M �a1»090wnt M00Mn/4100•1 1 Yo n rwoa F10.11100% J9197949 CON ROJO TICAL OFFICE BUILDING i 31170 TEMECULA PARKWAY :ULA, CA 92392 w 61 j 1AA1� 4 M■lael+a lald�ui};0104._ .-. •S 67Iiiir = i ^! ' y '• -♦ rs�'rrr 1 owo. 4 W N ���jj Z aet•••• { { CT ARCHITECT: ARGCT: /.Ota WENT: AGENCY' OBUILDINGBUILDING 1 • EAST ELEVATION Waves 0401-ore 2 1a•. ra• Ple1 Dcc1 0110 BULO 31 COLON ELEVATIONS *MUM. A6.14 OWNER/APPLICANT: s,04kurr.'4.0 • �iSUIT. avrp YWCA. 1.91/1. AT WAEi MAR A .011101 tM...)I4tVR! ------ - 01 ` moot -R1MW ---------- •••11001ERO T ...011004 -EE'IIiii 111.14 M1.11.11R1 �YE.tetMKWRM 1MM0WI0T.vya001 IIIIIIZ •A../ Yr t o MATEALSLEGEND ALS--_-_-_- (-VCn _-- -- - -_ 1181 ] j-N] OYE011CO1001EN 11W000RMlEb _-----.-- _-.--- (`, �l} 1-0-1- X:11 -.- IM 11.I Ar ._.`4rA-' r.n t I1yyyy��pI�� ®fW 11aI AW. 0.110.1C11.111/11.1.130.111:` ® weac41Y01EMNrCRa1111Qoomotw1 MO M000T 1..coroacamA4rED l R E �;' • MCMI i it - - - - iaelio141 i.{1WiCAi CmMF - - - _ - ri - - �• - - - - - - - - - - - - �- - - 4-� - e " `r rt � swamp,' nu 11E0NOOArnurE.lolEaDa 11.... r'lY 1 - a N ®yam 14.EHW'OOEM Forma mum unarm A,e OE 0,E1\�' -- 11.,. a::r _ -- •.1A1- - -- - ; 1 --- ��-- - - -® „� - to It RE - �r4D00AEE1 X11 cWiarousmI 10E0M1000RE1r01rKO011.X. ,E,14DwrwEunMlxnEwawEM1..1 ren a ml rragrom 1t440010101E401R00000101 rEslvoslr[slcDlrsuER atwl.4r ® rerlaEua snmooaw 03=1011- /// ',� 6 -- r-rwarnt unk nom a-r 1 1 _ -- d / CEO mow orr110 lwslavmwnsmul co / I L>�- s 7 ,_s _ was 1 ran Eras l CAEarRaowE — – J .•-..- - 1 -_ _ L'a4] - - O BUILDING 1- SOUTH ELEVATION m! artf err mum. OT.I.AWOL 0.1400 an R9t•111Y .01/041 r..a 'irii tupayE 111PVIIWW11P -.. RWM KK r rd WAWA .1141.0 AI etwl ARA Ru�rruc 112 r. Oa010 -------- - ------------ YMOKM. _ ----- 1/11010 0r0.1R,W0.1 MO - _ - _ -•-44 �B9i1 S Z } Q_ ® • a� 4 M IL M MI ira e_41 fol p ifHALCON ROJI I a° 'F,1 MEDICAL OFF I yZ 31150& 31170TEMA • • D£ TEMECULA,CA9259 a.•u 1..' D r r t BUILDING1- WEST ELEVATION O r �i G«mF04 -- w.T..o.l lr1145 0 BUILDING 1 • PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION Ali OWNER/APPLICANT: .11.1l1140.1.4240,m LLC w.1lwm.nrm IW .1Ff1Iw4 MATERIALS LEGEND r M-1 N(CtfTC.4.1el rain Odu10FE0R00114.11 foC0Mn W FAO <mu c cedomoorgust sdu tam WWI 0*c 15Taoi MMGwtC11M1 NI00.150.1MeWF' STOW'MAE as(] MAMMON FKRA5tO1.1A51en<e01n E0101 1-9751 vow FMIFR01 RN«FOTCM10.1PFEFN.4E0 owns UNK9 CIO ruesim00F nIE• MUM GUVnc FTKMCOKA ciam clan MrRtavSTta�wwLOME0 KuwAI ® wow Goss 1 ® Mt WM COLO 4103.1.1.4 "5/MM`FRa11aRa FM1 a l.nowausre...rtrwnlil aeOTw.aoco.on latO A EGM.diA 3.40010 l.WMa�aCOLOR il l W O/AA /1EPo 911.00%. ® Awl ilDW015tOM10Fts'A51{M ® ancne1 r la11 s1c, MCA COME (119.1.1 I .) leativCpe P )k. Sinan sn!Illu)ns 011,4 PAM 01301000. lakif OIY namaR.4 rKJ V Z} c 2 CO WS V u N � W O AWN Ci Q r j c°i — 4 0 e ▪ W W Z ;ti ARCIUTECT 12025 CLIENT: AGENCY. LVa4nh CMOYOT W1T ma BUILDING 1 COLOR ENLARGED PARTIAL ELEVATION 1A A6.16 ram _ OWNER/APPLICANT: 11444001000.41. 0.0110.00110001.4. LW o., 1100 .rmm 5I I I C_IF!i1I41111t'��{���QQ!!)fil --,8111? SUII{ll4)f14 -------------- ■xccono3.1 '--...11100000114103 MM44011.0121w01f0a01Os 04/00I0.1OI04100111 T,upYO1V1O0.11 ------------- — At 4.4001 111. 1OIAO1,Ato 0 OMNI 11IrY1 111.1001w11,111N11O1/11TO i--N'A"a°`°-------- MATERIALS LEGEND C a7 M _ u POW 0/1.4010 AT 00.0.000.000 ®ow ouran ra, —• - — - weon=rwwiawoa mug tlUP0YA1001 orr sT00.O11UrM °, •J_L - — - — - —/_l' / / �� - .' . _ i- 1- (TART �� ®11WPC P[ R81PalfSOMCNfE1.NKMOP1Cll MM1tAIP 101.4.0 Q I,A,11L11.r011fAM,MC,1Ytl,QOV, 00101 .. H �. {. •t. ,� -L..- - - - - _ _ - - - - _ �� * •.. um � * 07^ 7 _ _ _ 1— G ..-�. - — _ _ - � _ — _ — _ _ _- - — - — - — - — - — - — _ _ _ — _ — _ — - — _ b - 11/311.01.001.^tl00°011wa■orowrolnluu+m■o -Ori 414400100:011“ ,newowrneTTuoleolor moi ' ^T (' .. •- ! I• r�71 aIW1010,011100 ranm. �o1■oMTW MANY Or U,I.•a` LAW l ra-1 03Si llrllaw.maT■wITlKcow°■ /� CCM 40 WOW.. IAPAIINSII MT�1■. on ®011'.111010lIOCrW042110.i4wMM.w1 flTK8------ .,,,o 1',Er l - 0 � �` r�1 awn MAI= 01MOW001CROgIn01',0001011 ,711rwn.unA.wM,iwa L 0 - --'� j r' _ ---1 !tip , -... ,.� y ] ---MD rarn •IF �r,Mr,rowNnn�,r, OM UMW N1 ��. �• t.. , �, _ ^ moi'— r.40.03 I_ Irno411.00 •4r0•3.0100^ OIr 1.104 r.l^ in;a..•,nv.n, .0 MOW.l OMrl-.wvcoNn,.va.oa, OnJr r[1T4 1400010V0.010tu OryRryIliM ()BUILDING 2 • WEST ELEVATION Otor0.41011101,0431.01101 evwar, 041000.11.0.04. OWN. ionmi °olwrw 4.0:01010 WON. A.m., WNW% 14.000O 01001404/4440.400I04/4440.400hi OYIO 01011 10.1011.0 It 1- IV 04,../.110___043_ _ — _ _ — - — - — - — - — ri$011 Igp•r1Mµ0aldlr IAYM — - — - -MAN .06411 — — - — - — - — Al 441011.040 - - — - — - — - — - — - — - - 11 Z 04 an 401.10040011T110.401.00 0i}"----- ._-------- .:.. II rag--- a ., m L ---- — N-–- _ --- • — –- —®I dl� — -�1— - W 3 a� .r ,� ' TI ' imi I(1, LJ II1 ] ! I —i I�iP 'O• O I _ i'_ Will = lit J A' V z_ _ — - 0571 me .t 8 1 c��1.:5111111'2J „..,:„, ill �' I":_- 0 119 c 1I ii i® 1 S 2 �iii, , 17.19 I. I nanvcnn•Or 04040 CN4A•Mn.1IDofWOMPI—WOOwawa l•il N •00000100 0•Cfl 001010300.440. q/1.w CLINT:T1202373 ,041 , AGENCY. BUILDING 2 - SOUTH ELEVATION ni ucc 0000101 O • ,Tr iiTTll17---- 11010010 S REVATIOnS A6.21 MV.0110tM V/pMMRW11003100.10 :1..014M101.10410 OWNER/APPLICANT: 1.4 7.4041.1.: 1,n m'`A I ;16"g= a �t.LIU rircativf nidrt 1,oiti 1:AmA4[ p u.n'.. `-------------------- —14\[. VA --[pp[.Mr ROMA --- - I,Naa n.no rnln.Ma[un- --------- —0410« MATERIALS LEGEND ® —TRfAOnMLfnPgpQM rvrn s ols 0umr[I.1w0m46 0'T' -- — _ - — ---------'—.-----' ----- - LM uu0oloosc«Mae w[aw+ur.0 — - BM OM1„T OM.ATIM.[[CMK mOOVR0 OMM.rm It` y ® ® 4A6110LWN1ITNNATIIOLW.Cm.R00101. (*[A'u tbif...`_ - �l[� gam_ — _ — _ — _ — — _ — _ — _ — _ _ _ — _ — _ __ _ — _ _ — - _ — _ — ® 0.000 _MOM, �� ro wiw Mowaa 1/06131 I * % eVrr i--_—__-71_ —_—_ _�_—_ _--___,_—__ ______._—_--_ ran �usl laouw<urn[rtalman itp�p� r OM �W CMS Pt II II �--- - 11®In vel ;\ ••.� I 1 \. 1 _ •-, _ I ®CB.M1ILATI[.[N�. m�.L� 'INNMtl01MlNIrA 1.MMNN..1 t20 PANT I101M1011ICAV PONTRI1 I .. rain -- -- e ° __ A. __ ___ _ � M03.4110I rn NIL,1 „ I ii `)iii _ mum N■i ��e m.f ni in ` i •m i■■ r'—! 1 - tqM �, L ON.IMMM[ni L...0, 0Ce"---14,./1,6 40. �� �,ou: La,.ryF01,449,....14LTt , r[ I [� �,[�[ 11.1.1. L; A..IH M [� [a1,003 r 0; OM CI TVAMTIMHOt[ ML BUILDING 2 _ EAST ELEVATION 1.2"mmi 01,449,....14L [04[ o ottramirm O w7iiwy.qupl.111 OM—moc0wwanra.lW1 1 n,.Mo11Hv r..ua 0 ,,,ti'alia A1w1I —..... —RAW* tt4Y WPMv.M. Mg. TR la 4 OM _— —_—_— — — — — — — — — 2 Oa''i—_— — — — — — .__ _ _-_ _-_-_-_-_ -_ = _ -__ O u. 44 I MEI firl Bi ,,, MI O ® OKI �Off. 3 v— .:._ 1 �R _ Mill r'.;i'd u14.. J 1:1 2 ill / V 2; '1'.°a, 6,. :iV NM WEIy NI MN iEI MINI [>�li FN" —ua.10 Rel.1G0'CIW O0...1. i. QhRM uM•. Iryn :=4=0,00.0 WM Mll�OIM1M. tflTMMnOWMIMrv.r1 ros,w[Ivu.. 5(00.A[ ARCHITECT: 1205 Cl1EHT: ---7:4=''''""" n\r[ NDoaM a0WKM3 ABlNCV BUILDING 2 • NORTH ELEVATION PlelBi i O ____ BULOINO 2 ELEVATIONS i IITITRAVI— A6.22 OWNER/APPLICANT: «C iNaarxuw MATERIALS LEGEND ® LaEuuaLC.nwm.Ua S u ;II lafI tiohiI (1 S Orr,. }g Stepp 049 r10--. owMftoa _ _ _ _ _ VIICCA N4Antl WOKS - - - _ _..- On Mt. SIV•IMANr - - _ ---_-.--.-----_- W.****WMOnal*lierna0 -_-_-_ SLO.EMALAAOEST.P - - Mil ow.L1CCKOOtuomeoppo.wrap ® CW Iacono:1mm MASI CP.CM W TAO IAT *PMI a ren•IMPA*IRC1KVLHnprOR owsurT ® PLAVC MAIN I ail RNITGUYEIA GMROgp, ®aWOODKNIT� 'wNOT)W1WOWpap T Orn ne. mor N. NLUCGurru.:rem 1 ®O IXA Iwgw�OePOpCRONUna. 70 HEIP- * ',.Val * ~` ♦ , Y ff Of UCS i-: t -r mn . nrumn..noawatm aro mnwcaw -4t----.13 A ® Z y '�rZ~=3 :-- _qF. 11010 COLLO* tiaXTIswaAGM04M,ap. ®il Wla:aw 1111.0OOLOR i. r3i _ F .-�i �Tr-r-"- F.01MAInso np - Zi-:`1.-•.i . 2-. r -i i.s' i-..-S-i t -i i- -]�=2=..{-}-: - � �� f'� •pnAma t@mow ca. Dm anrcoawpA QYLKOrMiWfASMMNIUM lair___.^______. ) __—_—_— ___.... --- -_.___.-.-_ _- ._ ... __..... ... OM natal TOwTNSTAIIr.bRKLrDr A j�... n rl *Lnna. - _ �'' �� max.. ^= 'T 'TS 011.110V1101. GSR Z S -.-� .-i [��fpfEE_Rpp, � ` _ arrawrr ..n attnfataMMI. 0,04.4.1 I aftAH.larrL f� tqy . r- - ,-�-�r - r.. -"�, r r----.„1, gMli ®. — aatccoawaaawapR -- I^— - ..... ....�. b ..•... '. ••,...••..•.•• 1 S MILSCOMOIf aRAWT i—_—. re.}AC. wa --- _. .N,LTEtusm m 31170 . : 0 Dow.. nna :• Y.T..IVP ITS— .. III 6 WSCAM UV + ..... I II 1 EMANZOMANWOM.Q ' 0 S BUILDING 2- PARTIAL L SOUTH ,Lvmcmmpwm4 OM ELEVATION _Omonnwon O0 . 4. J•..:.. -. 1 � y.,., an..., �, ..,...... le>✓ Q 4 v.I. 3 ' p I I O 0 i 1 LToasrmians--• ARCHITECT: /2075 CLIENT: E BUEDLYG 2EMARRED PARTIALELEVATION8 lift rum. A6.23 O BUILDING 2 • WEST ELEVATION O BUILDING 2 • SOUTH ELEVATION OWNER/APPLICANT: WOEM .64 bGt10.011C V AM. GOIT PdMINfACO OM 512 i.110 MATERIALS LEGEND LEO 001.11.074 AT MAO =We (�rl P.110.2.}1 MOROOPonWYAo 09u201ro4300.01,1 01...far fA¢7 oY IA0,..01"0,..01"11.0.O PITEMALL PRODUCTS mom irmru 120 Iw1..1.011FMrU6T (WIWICOM Gam u er ITwamPI IOWTTnn«.119 row. $ MOINOCUY h. M. cam ci SfataPIT bY.M.noWIPLIIown ANYMY 1-W1 1CIPI P.661 lG1 442 QYO ML 9gOTMYM.YWMTYWMCOIO/1 ran �� I nmavoimmowucotonoroutuocaon il'NYOA.lOPC1MTNLNf.1 IM/6 Mal r711 J NOW 61GWMXttA GVONNNM91mon ma 5T1C000IXPT [n I PMT IIO WTP1 fTPW1016 SWUM Q WMOfi61 • ) cativo L{��, ple. marl OIUhrifK ARPOTECT: ISM GIANT: AGENCY: 44E040 eV BUILDING 2 COLO ELEVATIONS A6.24 an OWNER/APPLICANT:91.. n iwllw VTU I P ('JUYC' 11 . 'Hlliill S 1111.1' I —SM1ONISOOIPOM rufA.K ' Ia tit _ _ _ _____ _ _ _ _ -a MOSS OKONTM441OI10/MUMS _ _ ___ AMOS ru O01 WMIL ianw —1410,1.auvan® VILSIIIICAiL 1•1•04M Or �O22tAONSPM C—_— MATERIALS LEGEND OwooWWlIW9W InT)aTO¢CUuutnwoNUi ♦--_--—_ — — ___ —r- ---- _— --_— ♦ t.�W _ — _ _ S -� _ _ 'I J — _ -^ gRfGlglGld ONOIOIT ango STq'WP FlW NllMnip SIVIS I� RAMC WAN I PMAS•0.UYt AUT COWS ® WO rrIMOq r rMliq MO. MIAS° A;^ V * O . i ♦ _•_ .. _ a� i = _ _ _' - _ _L _ _ J _ _ _ = = PLASM YAMS I qq I `'l * �, P»n I100/1•t 1 W3)IAtOCW RE R.CM000M �� a�uwnln IloaTetruwP of cIIITA C Iill T ' _ - -- - r — =liriin _ - .. �"i'' Ball NIKHGLASMOS. '� �WT:�StO0)P(.WI�'C�M1M�M1o40K0 MEM �aRP� _ II 1iTITi A. -- ---t` I'Ahl InevcnKl Ian. O BUILDING 2 - EAST ELEVATION Midi asnom Ott 1...MAL • 1OIOYOt. wlOO YMu.1011.1t001110R r—PICOOWWistwowOK wt61TU OOP WOARMS OWO 0 WanwKWatTTI "narW OJON O.1006CSA 7 Q�.i4i _—_—_—_—_—__—_ A. _ _ 0°F10° —_ --—_—_—_—_—_—_ • MNCOtIN _-----_--- l.,. HALCON ROJO a'g MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDUP 31150 & 31170 TEMECULA PARKWAY • = g TEMECULA, CA 92592 N "'.$ 9 z Sr .111 VSB . _ — - — _ — _ — - — _ Makaru MJAioal Cursor - — - .... _ — - — t-- . .___ - - — - t 1>. . ll,tl NI DTVI_--_— _ ` _ _—... .t • riti'', - f 1 t BUILDING - NORTH ELEVATION I 1 I O w.Ts ��� OWNER/APPLICANT: ■eP.RA a.ti.e rsr•Iae `I'"°` MATERIALS LEGEND ® ua•o.mfe.rfw. =woe au) cwlau(■owwewCOLOR Mlffe t CM■G��D.D lu E'Jlivl' CODk ,gait sOlutiOlv. o.s..el su•u•wnM.uwue• O�i•°9°R"ir.•W0TgaY,gin WA... ssrnM.O. 1401001l MOP rn i Mel cus n oocMo. wrcacn MIND a9 D.eAP pun s'ra ,swaTOR,RQuWluwnalaIe Loam....saw■m..o.. ® naa e. ®.01.1.0t00.04.04000TOWTU1 fl® ue MCI srowlgrts..Irow.nawnonu..w ouw:wcuxorcaw Irl wnccrm.. .. • w¢� �j * a Ie cn. £ * ^,)4, ., o. G�I.A 0.10T1 ...ano.us. Lu.wa9.MPLASMMDD.Mn.a�i»iicwr.w■.n:r mn 1-0.11 OM 10 K.017.141•10.0VL COLLO WO SILLCOL01.00 - LI HOMY Mt. 14LVITA Mf1.0410101 PAW I TOMuaau,/OM :.slnl t run .D•.D... I iar- _ y -_-_- __-_-_-___ -_-- -_ M.xwrts Deea.no. DM 11,16100 or9sunna 0.01.1E0010•01..n0.01.1E0010•01.MM.w. V9 -•--._.V' ... _-_ Rs1a . • M' './If- -_-_--- _�-- __ -- - - - 0 y _ wI j�Sf's i iu :: I }iit • nroofwurnw9wf AM.• __f i::::i V�"1liif�V--_---•----- w —_ r;-T. 91170 13 HALCON ROJO ma) _ '5 MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING u 31150: 31170 TEMECULA PARKWAY :, „ g TEMECULA, CA 92592 0) fn$ SW. OUT 00.9I .,, 0. Anr ..1 lierr11.8NAFIR. fraca Vil.Lw _..... 17- ,.7 0 :u /, II p i t LAM voOL eMM.aowwoOVALLS -"r ., li.P.,l— ii T ::::::i•:.. II tt t'�2 f >. eAFP .- BUILDING 2 - PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION O e riinJ i OVNADI K•0 ,—lcoiw¢r9101.11r �4- O BUILDING 1 - SECTION 9 9L1 CICaltvl' ll( 'smart !.0I1.1110 11'. .rwns orwrrw wrz PTV e..wRrNeenba. anmyn.iu anasa...T. wanaa z,. 34m ▪ V o S 0 ; 1 z • u rb • — W .. 12r, ARCHITECT: I2025 CLIENT: AGENCY. wnrn al6lOf/: BMW* I SECTIONS A7.11 08eaU fet4 llfl an aI wernu 11.11.4)11 HALCON ROJO AWAIT CCT. IN:f WENT. ACIMCY. bMs Ir WOQO1fY BUIDNG S BCCTgh9 A7.21 HALCON ROJO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING LIGHTING CALCULATIONS: Parking / CALGreen Compliance 0aW9/21/2013 74..8004: r201303-26 Yukon top pN10mt uk<cci CALCULATOR K: UR ••41,0I1n1N101Mi0n multi «I b11N on pho onannc dale orn+amd by n.nul«3«1n lad Indutuy lundvdl loo rdbrl (Ammon of turbos Lonna** * S1MduW 1020204106001002 CORDING RIRECTANQ: 8011 SIOEWMA RE0SERANCE: 3P%CONOIETE GROUND RERECCNICE: 26%ASR W T CALL. RAKE RUGA.: AT GRACIE *ad 816N Wgnn T50 Saud CI1vdPeon 0) indon.26W CIL tom. Wil11 kb1u.71 L oWnt/WnP baa 117.1%1 UO 100 N 101 mum QANI Out /800/101 1104,0NN Ude uo.16A•1101K 110.PSMN Pompon. 11501 AIN P•llln«« ISA1A•P0WS UA14-P-1301 5 WV ULManal I pnTSID AfIWINNDa 210 110 531 UK 30103 31000 22000 1160 6e 61 A7 IOW 0100 0700 0.760 CISCO 01CO 80 0100 0!60 ONO 1.000 SOK 1.000 1000 01Tm 1(02 0300 0560 0.8004 0.671 Wee*TCW 1066.41 IS14IM1KIP9Su 11A1414061/1k. 130,14A41101IS.W1 IR176921f1 Non0Ao11 klaxon fun0oon r Coon PI Cutoff 11.0741 168080 01.8000 01.0002 00.8000 VOAIr. Unnoury 110.1 vR110 NonsukLwry tabu O11elpbn Arca TOWWIW IPO 201011 10)7.04 0074 8nh Al0 moo nen Anf000 sounobi IRunoanco Nbononarto k k 6.14 ul 26.2 IRS 00 ul NA NA. -. w.un1)AI{y LING. ■ Iri rOINOMIEIRMiliAMINIMMEnreirr .4MM/in, 1121..030 :b..,Mak.aw1,�r�It airftli��. !al'il � IN MINI ' MO itmi Ili AINEet • itri 4.1x' til drt, /' el AM• CANDELA Lighting Design and Consulting 9191 'Immo Centcc Ur, Suitt 220 Son Moon. Colifon.IA 92122 858.022.2700 800.667.0610 tilow.0mde10.c m PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA12-0226 AND PA12-0227, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF BUILDINGS (FROM THREE TOTALING 65,640 SQUARE FEET TO TWO TOTALING 54,860 SQUARE FEET) AND A REVISION OF THE ARCHITECTURE FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND A MINOR EXCEPTION TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF THE HALCON ROJO MEDICAL OFFICE COMPLEX BY 3'-3", LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF THE JEDEDIAH SMITH AND TEMECULA PARKWAY INTERSECTION (APN 959-060-007) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 15, 2012, Terry Strom, on behalf of Makena Medical Buildings Temecula, LLC., filed Planning Application No. PA12-0226, a Development Plan Application and PA12-0227, a Minor Exception Application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Applications were processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Applications and environmental review on April 17, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA12-0226 and PA12-0227 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Minor Modification, Development Code Section 17.05.030.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; 1 The proposed use is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan. According to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Professional Office Land Use Designation allows for multi -tenant office buildings situated in a landscaped garden setting. This project consists of two 2 -story office buildings with sufficient landscaping and outdoor amenities consistent with the objectives contained in the General Plan. The proposed project is also consistent with all zoning requirements for PDO -6. The project meets all applicable design standards contained within the Development Code and City -Wide Design Guidelines, and the design of the project meets the intent of the Community Design Element of the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and all applicable fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of this project, including the site design, building elevations, parking circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project, as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner which will protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Minor Exception, Development Code Section (17.03.060.D.2) C. That there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code due to the physical characteristics of the property; Tenants occupying the project after construction will have several modalities including MRI, CT, PETCT and regular x-ray equipment. This type of equipment has installation space requirements that have demonstrated a practical difficulty in the Rancho Pueblo medical office buildings located on the east side of PDO -6 with regard to ensuring the equipment and HVAC ducting, fire sprinklers, electrical and data lines, etc. co -exist. The extra 3'-3" will alleviate this difficulty. D. The Minor Exception does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity; The Minor Exception does not grant any special privileges to the applicant. This is because other property owners with similar circumstances may also apply for a Minor Exception. In addition, staff has determined that the Minor Exception is not detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. 2 E. The Minor Exception places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties and does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone; The Minor Exception does not negatively impact the surrounding properties since it is only comprised of a small increase in building height. In addition, the Minor Exception does not permit a use that is not allowed within the Professional Office General Plan designation. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Major Modification and Minor Exception Applications. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") for the Project, approved by the Planning Commission as Planning Application No. PA01-0522 on July 31, 2002, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major Modification and Minor Exception Applications do not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or (Mitigated) Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed Major Modification and Minor Exception Applications do not involve significant new effects, do not change the baseline environmental conditions, and do not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Major Modification and Minor Exception applications will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the previous MND. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Major Modification and Minor Exception Applications are adequately addressed by the prior MND, and the mitigation measures contained in the MND will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines is therefore the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Major Modification and Minor Exception Applications, and no additional environmental documentation is required. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application Nos. PA12-0226 and PA12-0227, a Major Modification to allow a reduction in the number of buildings (from three totaling 65,640 square feet to two totaling 54,860 square feet) and a revision of the architecture for a previously approved Development Plan, and a Minor Exception to increase the height of the Halcon Rojo Medical office complex by 3'-3", located on the north side of Temecula Parkway, approximately 400 feet east of the Jedediah Smith and Temecula Parkway intersection subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. 3 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of April, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Patrick Richardson, Secretary 4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application Nos.: PA12-0226 and PA12-0227 Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: A Major Modification to allow a reduction in the number of buildings (from three totaling 65,640 square feet to two totaling 54,860 square feet) and a revision of the architecture for a previously approved Development Plan, and a Minor Exception to increase the height of the Halcon Rojo Medical office complex by 3'-3", located on the north side of Temecula Parkway, approximately 400 feet east of the Jedediah Smith and Temecula Parkway intersection 959-060-007 Commercial Office Service Commercial/Office NA (Non -Residential) Approval Date: April 17, 2013 Expiration Date: April 17, 2015 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Two Hundred Six Dollars and Twenty -Five Cents ($2,206.25) which includes the Two Thousand One Hundred Fifty -Six Dollars and Twenty -Five Cents ($2,156.25) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Planned Development Overlay No. 6 (Rancho Pueblo). PL -7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL -8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -1 0. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -11. The applicant shall paint a three-foot by three-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. PL -12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL -13. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Stucco Classic Cream, Panama Ivory, Tawny — Smooth Santa Barbara Finish (Color Expo) Trellis Redwood (EPS — Plastic Lumber) Roof Tiles Spanish Roof Tile — Peach Color Column Pre -Cast Concrete Column Vehicular Paving Gran Pietra — Orco Block PL -14. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. PL -15. Parking for the project shall be shared across the site, including parking spaces in all lots that are a part of the project. If the project involves multiple lots, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use Agreement, which provides for cross -lot access and parking across all lots. PL -16. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Planning Director. PL -17. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL -18. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL -19. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL -20. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. PL -21. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -22. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. PL -23. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation. PL -24. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. PL -25. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer. PL -26. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. PL -27. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. PL -28. A 30 -day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30 -day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. PL -29. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30 -day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Department approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." PL -30. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -31. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to riot adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL -32. All downspouts shall be internalized. PL -33. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, oras amended bythese conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -34. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL -35. The Landscaping and I rrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verity that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -36. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -37. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -38. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL -39. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verity that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -40. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL -41. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape (choose or add to as appropriate) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -42. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PL -43. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45 -inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. PL -44. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. PL -45. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional streetlights, whichever occurs first, the developer shall complete the Public Works application, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan, and pay the advanced energy fees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -46. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. PL -47. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL -48. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL -49. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." PL -50. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. PL -51. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL -52. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL -53. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. PL -54. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures set forth in the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians letter dated March 6, 2013, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Comments B-1. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed and submitted to Building and Safety. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2010 California Energy Codes, 2010 California Green building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. 2010 California Green Building Standards provide 10% voluntary measures on project. B-4. Show path of accessibility throughout site. Trash enclosure must be accessible. B-5. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Division of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. B-6. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B-7. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F-2. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 2 -hour duration (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-3. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on-site and offsite 6" x 4" x 2-2'/" outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-4. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official (CFC Chapter 5). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F-5. Maximum cul-de-sac- length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 45 feet (CFC Chapter 5 along with Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-6. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-7. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-8. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-9. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). F-10. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-11. The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14 and Chapter 5). F-12. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F-13. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-14. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-15. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial, multi -family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6 -inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi -family residential units shall have 4 - inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-16. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). F-17. The developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health Department and Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 34 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. Applicant shall ensure any landscaping surrounding buildings is kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to prevent would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. PD -2. Applicant shall ensure any trees surrounding building rooftops be kept at a distance to prevent roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. PD -3. Any berms shall not exceed three feet in height. PD -4. Applicant must comply with the standards of Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations, for residential standards, refer to publication CEC-400-2008-O16-CMF- REV-I. PD -5. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness, in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. Minimum lighting is one foot-candle in parking areas. PD -6. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with Riverside County Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655, low pressure sodium lighting preferred. PD -7. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one foot-candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. PD -8. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings less than 8 feet high shall be vandal resistant. PD -9. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. PD -1O. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24- hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP. PD -11. Upon completion of construction, each building or business shall have an alarm system that is monitored by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi -tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall each have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. PD -12. Any roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PD -13. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well - lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. PD -14. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. PD -15. The fuel supply for emergency generators shall be secured within a locked enclosure and have a locking access port or filler cap. PD -16. Employee training regarding credit cards, theft, citizens' arrest procedures, personal safety, business security or any other related crime prevention subject is available free of charge through the Crime Prevention Unit. To schedule an appointment call (951) 506-5132. PD -17. Applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. PD -18. The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost for inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for goods or services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of the business advising customers of the "Inkless Ink Program" in use. If the business becomes a victim of check fraud, the Police Department will be able to track the suspect with the thumbprint. PD -19. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included below: 1. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. 2. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. 3. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. 4. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. 5. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. 6. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. 7. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. 8. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. 9. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. PD -20. The Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department offers free business security surveys, to schedule an appointment contact the Crime Prevention Unit at (951) 506-5132. PD -21. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506-5132. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City -maintained street right-of-way. PW -3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. PW -4. All improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW -5. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls into the design of the project to prevent non -permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm water conveyance system or receiving water during all field activities. PW -6. A conceptually -accepted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be submitted to the Department of Public Works as part of the initial grading plan submittal package. PW -7. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be consistent with the accepted WQMP. PW -8. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. PW -9. The vehicular movement for Temecula Parkway shall be restricted to a right in/right out movement. PW -10. The applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Rancho Community Church (PA00-0470) as approved on September 24, 2002. PW -11. The applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 30798 (PA02-0562) as approved on April 24, 2003. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW -12. The WQMP must receive final acceptance by the Department of Public Works. PW -13. The project shall submit a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement that must include the owner's notarized signature, proof of recordation with the County Recorder's Office, and all maintenance procedures for each of the structural treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the WQMP. PW -14. PW -15. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with the Construction, Grading and Encroachment Ordinance Section 18.24.140 A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. PW -16. A Geological Report shall be submitted and approved by the County Geologist. PW -17. The developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. PW -18. Construction -phase pollution prevention shall be consistent with the Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 18.15 and associated technical manual and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. PW -19. PW -20. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the project's Risk Level (RL) determination number, and name, contact information, and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. The developer shall receive written clearance from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board, Army Corps of Engineers, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or other affected agencies for direct discharges into the existing drainage channel. PW -21. The developer shall obtain letters of permission/easement for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letter/easement shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. PW -22. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW -23. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW -24. PW -25. PW -26. PW -27. PW -28. Precise Grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Driveway shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Number 207A b. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number 800. c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number. 400. d. All street and driveway center line intersections shall be at 90 degrees. e. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. The Developer shall pay a mitigation fee in an amount acceptable to the Department of Public Works. Said fee shall reflect the percentage of impact at each intersection and shall be in accordance to the traffic impact analysis dated May 17, 2002. The developer shall construct all public improvements outlined in these conditions to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works a. Improve Temecula Parkway (Urban Arterial (6 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 100A-134' R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW -29. The developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. PW -30. PW -31. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW -32. PW -33. The project shall demonstrate that all of the structural water quality facilities outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. PW -34. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -35. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -36. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. VIA E-MAIL and USPS PECHANGA CULTURAL RESOURCES Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Post Office. Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92593 Telephone (951) 308-9295 • Fax (951) 506-9491 March 6, 2013 Mr. Eric Jones Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 4100 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Chairperson: Germaine Arenas Vice Chairperson: Mary Bear Magee Committee Members: Evie Gerber Darlene Miranda Bridgctt Barcello Maxwell Aurelia Manuffo Richard B. Scearce, 111 Director: Gary DuBois Coordinator: Paul Macarro Cultural Analyst: Anna Hoover Re: Pechanga Tribe Proposed Mitigation Measures for the Halcon Rojo Project, PA12- 0226 Dear Mr. Jones: As we discussed in our meeting and in our previous letter dated January 25, 2013, the Pechanga Band is not opposed to this project; however we are opposed to any and all adverse effects and significant impacts to the Luiseiio Ancestral Origin Landscape Area. Based on available information, the Tribe understands that previous grading activities have been conducted on the property, but only to a depth of 18 inches for the majority of the site. Given the information we know at the present time, we are concerned with any ground -disturbing activity below prior grading depths, including utility trenching. Therefore, the Tribe requests that, at a minimum, the City include the following mitigation measures and language in the conditions of approval for the currently proposed Project. MM 1 Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified archaeological firm to monitor all ground -disturbing activities. MM 2 Pechanga Tribal monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities. Prior to issuance of grading permit, Project Applicant must submit a fully executed Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement, by and between the Pechanga Tribe the Project Applicant, and the landowner. The Agreement shall address the treatment of cultural resources on the Project property, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Halcon Rojo, PA 12-0226 March 6, 2013 Page 2 MM 3 activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Project Applicant shall file a grading plan with the City, and a copy to the Pechanga Tribe, which sets forth the plan and methodology for grading activities, including a timeline, locations and nature of grading, details concerning the observation of grading activities by the archaeological firm and the Pechanga Tribe. Said plan or methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor and Pechanga Tribal monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. At least 7 business days prior to project grading, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program/schedule, and to coordinate with the Tribe on the monitoring work schedule. In accordance with the Agreement required in MM 2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the nature and significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Such evaluation shall include culturally appropriate temporary and permanent treatment pursuant to the Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement, which may include avoidance of cultural resources, in-place preservation and/or re- burial on Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity. Any reburial shall occur at a location predetermined between the landowner and Pechanga, details of which to be addressed in the Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement in CR MM2. MM 4 If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur in the vicinity of the find(s) until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then identify the "most likely descendant(s)", which parties agree will Iikely be the Pechanga Band based upon the Tribe's ancestral ties to the area and previous designation as MLD on projects in the geographic vicinity. The landowner shall engage in consultations with the most likely descendant (MLD). The MLD will make recommendations concerning the treatment of the remains within 48 hours as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in CR MM 2. Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band of Luiseiio Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592 Sacred Is The Duty Musted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Haicon Rojo, PA12-0226 March 6, 2013 Page 3 MM 5 The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition pursuant to the Agreement required in CR MM2. MM 6 All sacred areas, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved. MM 7 It is understood by the Applicant, the City and the Tribe that this Project area is located in the vicinity of and possibly contains components of a culturally significant Pechanga/Luiseno village, known as Yamiinga and/or associated cultural properties, including a Traditional Cultural Property (TCP). The Project area and TCP contain not only archaeological components, but also resources with cultural values, including, but not limited to ceremonial components. If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological or cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources, which may include avoidance of cultural resources, in-place preservation and/or re -burial on Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity. Any reburial shall occur at a location predetermined between the landowner and Pechanga, details of which to be addressed in the Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement in CR MM2. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Planning Director for decision. The City Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. The Tribe reserves the right to fully participate in the environmental review process, as well as to provide further comment on the Project's impacts to cultural resources and potential avoidance and mitigation measures for such impacts. We further reserve our right to provide additional mitigation measures or revise the ones contained herein should additional information become available that warrants such additional or revised mitigation measures. Please ensure that any new technical reports, grading plans, development plans and other pertinent information are provided to the Tribe timely so that we can prepare additional comments and mitigation as may be warranted during the environmental review process for this Project. Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band of Luisefio Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592 Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Halcon Rojo, PA 12-0226 March 6, 20I3 Page 4 The Pechanga Tribe looks forward to working together with the City of Temecula in protecting the invaluable Pechanga cultural resources found in the Project area. Please contact me at 951-770-8113 or at eozdil®pechanga-nsn.gov once you have had a chance to review these measures and comments so that we can discuss the Project further. Thank you. Sincerely, I. Tuba Ebru Ozdi Tribal Planner Cc Pechanga Office of the General Counsel Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band gfLuiseiio Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CR 92592 Sacred Is The Duly Trusted Unto Our Cate And With Honor We Rise To The Need Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: PA12-0226 and PA12-0227 Terry Strom, on behalf of Makena Medical Buildings Temecula, LLC. A Major Modification to allow a reduction in the number of buildings and a revision of the architecture for a previously approved Development Plan and a Minor Exception to increase the height of the Halcon Rojo Medical office complex by 3'- 3". The original Development Plan consisted of three medical buildings totaling 65,640 square feet. The Major Modification will create two structures totaling 54,860 square feet. The project is generally located on the north side of Temecula Parkway approximately 400 feet east of the Jedediah Smith and Temecula Parkway intersection. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and therefore exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162) Eric Jones, (951) 506-5115 City of Temecula, Council Chambers April 17, 2013 6:00 p.m. The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. C:\Program Files (x86)1Neevia.Com\Document Converterltemp13898.docx ITEMS 4-8 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: STAFF REPORT— PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION April 17, 2013 Matthew D. Peters, AICP, Case Planner Planning Application No. PA13-0022, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -07) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Date Street approximately 440 feet west of the centerline of Kingwood Road Planning Application No. PA12-0233, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -20) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the southeast corner of Redhawk Parkway and El Chimisal Road Planning Application No. PA12-0234, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -21) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Regina Drive, approximately 195 feet east of the center line of Valentino Way Planning Application No. PA12-0235, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high steel textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -23) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Redhawk Parkway, approximately 15 feet west of the center line of Callesito Vallarta Planning Application No. PA12-0237, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -26) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Redhawk Parkway, approximately 101 feet east of the center line of Via Puebla Approve with Conditions CEQA: Notice of Exemption (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) 1 BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates low profile, fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS") to provide wireless telecommunication services. This project is similar, but separate from, the previously approved DAS network for Crown Castle, which included 39 nodes for anchor tenant, MetroPCS, and up to three additional carriers such as Sprint, T -Mobil, or AT&T. This DAS network will consist of 10 antenna nodes for anchor tenant, Verizon, and up to three additional carriers. Of the 10 nodes included in this DAS Network, two of the nodes will be constructed in the City of Murrieta and three will be constructed in Riverside County. The remaining five nodes to be constructed in the City of Temecula will consist of antenna arrays on slim -line monopoles designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right-of-way. The antenna nodes will be interconnected by approximately 30,188 feet of fiber optic cable. The fiber runs will be both aerial and underground, with approximately 8,388 linear feet of cable installed underground in newly installed conduit, 19,300 feet of cable installed in existing leased duct, and 2,500 linear feet installed aerially. The proposed DAS nodes would be connected to Crown Castle's existing Temecula network. The southern portion of the proposed DAS would also be attached to a new fiber hub station, while the northern portion of the proposed DAS would be connected directly to the existing Temecula DAS network. The DAS, as constructed, will support Verizon and their respective subscribers. Crown Castle also provides radio frequency support services to public agencies for public communications, internet service providers and other wireless data communications providers. The location of the nodes in this DAS network are illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan and locations for the five proposed nodes are shown in the vicinity and aerial maps. Engineering drawings for new street lights are also attached. ANALYSIS This project includes the following five nodes: TP -07; TP -20; TP -21; TP -23; and TP -26. Each node is designed as a textured steel street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right-of-way. TP -07 doesn't include the cobra light arm given the proximity of other street lights along Date Street. Instead, TP -7 is evenly spaced between existing SCE street lights minus the light. The proposed street lights will have the same finish and light arm attachment as a standard Southern California Edison street light. The only minor differences between the poles besides the antenna arrays will be a slightly larger outside diameter (eight inches for standard SCE light pole versus ten inches for Crown Castle), and a taller overall height (32 feet for SCE light poles versus approximately 40 feet high for Crown Castle). It should be noted that the top of the luminaire or light fixture will be 32 feet for consistency along the street right-of-way. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 4, 2013 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is the state agency charged with regulating competitive local exchange carriers, such as Crown Castle. Pursuant to the CPUC's CEQA procedure, the review process commenced with the submittal by Crown Castle of a Notice of Proposed Construction (NoPC). The NoPC contains a complete project description and a number of exhaustive environmental assessments. On the basis of its review of the NoPC, the Energy Division of the CPUC issued a "Notice to Proceed," (NTP), which also constitutes a determination of categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301(b), 15202(c), 15303(d), 15304(f), and 15332. Following issuance of the NTP, the CPUC posted a "Notice of Exemption" under CEQA with the State Clearinghouse (SCH Numbers: 2012098231, 2010018173). CEQA contemplates only one environmental determination for any given project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15051(c), where more than one governmental agency is involved in the project, the public agency which acts first shall be the lead agency. In this case, the CPUC acted first when it issued the categorical exemption for the DAS network. This project involves 10 DAS nodes; two in Murrieta; three in Riverside County; and five in Temecula. Both Murrieta and Riverside issued ministerial, encroachment permits for the DAS nodes in their respective jurisdictions. However, Temecula's ordinance Section 17.40, Telecommunications Facility and Antennas Ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for certain cell towers, and antennas. For the purpose of environmental determination for the CUP's, and based on prior environmental review by the CPUC, the City determines that the project is exempt from CEQA, per CEQA Section 15303, Class 3, which involves the construction of small facilities or structures, including water main, sewage, electrical, gas, and other utility extensions. FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. The antenna has been located and designed to match existing street lights already located in the City right-of-way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. 3 The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The wireless antenna will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS Crown Castle DAS Master Plan Map (TP Nodes for Verizon) Vicinity Maps Plan Reductions Resolution — PA13-0022 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution — PA12-0233 Exhibit A — Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution — PA12-0234 Exhibit A — Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution — PA12-0235 Exhibit A — Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution — PA12-0237 Exhibit A — Draft Conditions of Approval Notices of Public Hearing 4 Sheet Information Project Number 170369 Q 114 112 3/4 1 MI L =nd Editing Fiber Proposed Ober Metro PCS Node Slee q Verizon Node Site Metro/V.36 on Node Sfte 17 1100 Dexter Ave Seattle, Wa. 98109 805-704-4909 Date: May 23, 2012 Scale: No Scale Dwg.1 of 1 Rev. # 0 P,413_ OD zz. fAiz-0233 TP- 20 Project Site n' POPPY OVERLA b TR #4/t0 !�II ♦,po.��,, ��ti �\TVle �► 0#40 �a 1 laillat IA6V 7% ,' L4$It\ �on► . 01 ,3 ii GAROLIPASS • ltai . FREESIA,,112ii* 1 \ i2 -.-p.J-6,), ila- -POPPY ST Project Sit! Wi9 ►fie O FCO L�T� \ li* <2 4 $ REOHAWK PKY z p4tz--025, TP -2-3 Project Site P4/2-02.37 -r Project Site ANZA RD FiTr[-VI 1 CRSO Ww ;'JN NG WEST, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTESi CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME TP -07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE S/S ON DATE ST 440' C/L OF KINGWOOD RD CITY OF TEMECULA, CA VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL NEW 32' STEEL TEXTURED POLE INSTALL CIRCUIT BREAKER AT 7' 0". INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9 O'CLOCK AND 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 12'7". INSTALL (2)10N ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9 O'CLOCK AND 3 0CLOCK POSITION AT 16' 3'. INSTALL (3) PANEL ANTENNAS AT 0° / 120°1240° AZIMUTHS WITH A RAD CENTER OF 2T 6'. INSTALL (I )TRI SECTOR ANTENNA ON TOP OF POLE. INSTALL (I) 24" x 36" FIRER SPLICE BOX, INSTALL (2) GROUND TEST WELTS. INSTAL. (2) GROUND RODS. INSTALL (I) ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL_ PROJECT SUMMARY %SHEET NUMBER: DESCRIPTION TITLE NEST NOTES & DETAILS N01PS&DETADS NOTES •DUALS AbTPSa DETAILS POLE PROFILE POLE PROFILES SITE PHOTOS SITE PLAN SHEET INDEX PROJECTMANAOBR: CROWN CASTLE 1100 DEXTER AVENUE STE 250 SEATTLE, WA 98109 STEVEWEINOARDT (805)235-1431 STEVEN.WEINOARDTOCROWNCASTLE.COM NODE ENGINEER: COASTAL COMMUNICATIONS 3355 MISSION AVE. STE 234 OCEANSIDE, CA. 92058 (760) 754-9240 En. 101 TODD%COASTALCOMMINC.COM CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CROWN CASTLE 1100 DEXTER AVENUE STE 250 SEATTLE. WA 98109 STEVE PATINO (805) 7154431 STEPHON.PAT MO.CONTRACPDWACRO W NCASTLE COM FEB 07 2013 PROJECT TEAM TP -07 VICROWN .A`71r+. NG WEST, INC T,_.••••11fr CCI TSIE00Mf111AKATIN6 CONNATANTS CMIIALt.WIITIOWMMSS SDf OrmikIN TAM 00 MAIO PRO•111.ARY1N104M4 1O1 TNO1.dMAT1O MTAW[L W TN6 SEI Oic A Wf IST01RRTARY AND CPVITIISTALTO vamp:. ANYU56011 IXTa.01114 TNN AS IT MUM 0 VFW.. 6TRKTLY Nd MILLD CALL CAU AI OAST Tho OA. MORI Ya: POO UWwOAOUNOTAVICE ALERT Lf(x4Ti VOWS m.NNAn.uiu 9101 4AN,.n TP -0T STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT/ ANTENNA POLE WS ON DATE ST 44V CA OF KNDIY000 RO CITY OF TEMECULA, CA TITLE SHEET ) "AGR 112/2532 Tr 1 OF 9 B LEGEND �YMBO DESCRIPTION di012102 p MAIM .211104. TIWu101PR1r10a..,T L_.1 a ;41,4 11 - ABBREVIATIONS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 1411033MRY E4050141014024 CONTROL PRIOR TO C014/4431044 OF RIM 011303,IMpli MM11 BP. rEAfORMED BY TE COMMCTOR OR QUALIfIEO RRSUN AS mpKATD BELOW LALLPEORRREMENFBOFTRECITY OFIEMECUL& "IAAUDEVEI.CMEM MAAUAL MINH WATMM RrAAUARIn^ MUST eEM'CORrouTEODrtOrnIDts10NAwnCOMRTRUCT)1CFmRAMKEO PUBLIC IMPROVDEMs WA3E1111r Wm1 mEfl10sI0NCONROLPLAM McvtwnTQPoUM10:1CONT0L MAN 44104 O AP UC40LE 2 404 3T001 DRAIN 134.413. PROVI06AO21AYEL OAO 4143 1433W SL-.DIATELY IRSTPFAM OF MEI AS 1413ICATEDON MTh. ),INE COMMCIOR ORQUAUITCD'MON SMLL It TOS30133101.6.40R0.E211004 SRT 4413 40.10 .401.444444 STOUR) ANO 5!01341OBNH SYSIFM DUE TO CONSTALCTO.N ACTIFY. 4 TIECOCRACT0451UILRV OV651LTAWO-NSAR1ERMCNMMORMRDALL S.4.4U0412.4.4AMDRVMLS5rc. WBR0.TA.Y wont MALL Bt MACS AVABA0l6ATALL1D•SSDUROO 711E133.0115.5014 E mE CC411114CI3R5I1.4LLR651011.6 ALL EROSONSE001P.Mr WMTOL DBYKES TO WOAKtNO ORM TO TNSSATMACTON OF m areIHOPYAR OR WHAM 61.4m42.1 AETFRECM RIM OR PROOUCDM 4.4.137.44.4 f mSCOMIRACTORSMLLRlTAU.ADOmONALROSIOMUMW! CONTROLIAFASUOA AS MAYBE REp4RFDEY 11I6RDNPT ENGINEER DUE IO1.43I044f3434 0144.4434.-43.33.111011434 MISE 13.611.121000141NIVINNICONIKILNPAWRIISPIKWINIDM I0AEEWVF0A0ODYEMID0NAMSPRYI Bfi R.LDRrOMTFD MEIWN.ALL EROSIDWSEDDESRCW TRDLEOR INTERS. COOIIIOMS SILL BE DONE TO MRL SATSrAC1lON OI 414413434013342 LNOINITIL L ALLRDMOVARLLIWICCinlDI.VIC4SSNORwSMALLEENI PLACE AT 111. 1313 OF EAU WORKING DAY MIEN MINIS DAMEN, IB 1HI0044fRAC301 WALLAIIMNOR F01 WEEKLY 24tOTD050UR1MCOCNMER IST TOAPAL,O lIFOR PROTECT TEM IGD.EMLCOMMCTORMLIALIFIW PBESOH. MLOS1mICO MR0. 31.1[ONIPACTOR IP ANY. ENGWEFR Of WORK.OWNEROEVPLOPERANOTILRDDMMDRE0IESAITO EVALUATE TE ADEQUACY OF mE 4.4051 WSEDDAENF CONTROL I?ASIMES ANOOmE RELATED COHSIRM101. 40T4I1134. STORMDRAIN INLET PROTECTION INLET OF PAVEMENT FLOW •+ PLOW SPILLWAY. I -BAG 111011 SANDBAO 2 -BAGS HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH OPPOSING FLOW DIRECTIONS EDGE OF INLET PAVEMENT FLOW FLOW SPILLWAY. I-BAO 111GHASANDBAG 2 -BAGS HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH SINGLE FLOW DIRECTION NOTES: INIEIUEO FORSIIORT • TF RM USE 2. USE TO INHIBIT NON • STORM WATER FLOW. 3. ALLDWFOR PROPER MAINTENANCE AND CLEANUP. 4. BAW MET PEREMOVED AFTER ADMCENTOPFAA1lON ISCOMPETEO. S. NOT APRICABLEINASPAS WITH FB011SI.TmANO CLAYS MINDERIB.1DI/A,Rlc. NOTES: T COMR4C1C4 POnNOL8All unn 22063343 F. 00.1713.4410I IOP IAM SNRIs40SM20UNO MOW. 814443DRA4. INLETS IOPREYEM COVIN.IFMTFD WATER 3 6MESPSF WIL BEGOLEPEO42I0004.140IEO AND STREET Mil SE S136PI ATM UMIEOA5 NUM 4 COMMOIMII0WAR04M0LOMANX YV0.0VFACM9 TO THESAT6PA444311 INE COY 1MONFER S CUM & OVMER TO RE PROTECTW M HA01 LoeW*K LOBS IOPLACSO TO M SAIRFACl10M Or IME CIn BNONEPR 6 TIE COMPACTOR WWI. RLSTORE 1W ROADWAY MN TO ITS 01KVPM00A011O21 SATISFACTORY TOflE WEMMAtO.U0ICC OUT IOTUMTW TO 443440.4111441.10 IM410WOILINI LLOI OELIO- 66101146/0101642613111:140/11 3.3 4kS34ltM/LOtMVt.cto eatenr0P HMx1RA,RNW10MAIMS07.06, 6*6114500110 PEINSINWIMIPM106/KRSIMMSD ROW GROUND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1 &. 1 T. 000000.3,*111001104TOtl.MOYECLEAMM LORMIIS, MNIS. SOMAS. 04 24344435233 VERTICAISOT1140 POLE. ALL C034311444110N3441.2. REIN AA OROAHCE wax MIMKWALE LCOUNIY.STAT FEDERA40P5A21DOTTA121CCAROSAND RIOULATIONS C631,686 M HOW* M NW* TO E%CA VATMO AT 66101131.2444200 LI I ALL LANOSCM.L10-RA3TORW 30 01110044LCOAVM10NOR BETTER ALL0000CM3401 610060 MOQMO CABINLIREQUIRES N' (LWMNCI AT 0 00 6 014130 CAULK CABOET BAR AT PM NORMAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: I LOCAINW AHO DEMI OFEKISITN0 AND PROPOSED UIMSII65MUSTB6MOY0ED BY TME SMOYICAR ANO MOW ON ANY PLANS SOE10TIEDIO THE PEPT.OFFOLKWOPN6TOI 1 EMIMLS MAY OEPIRMRTD EYTEPEPT.OF PURL WORKS IN CASSOFCOIOUCTOC FAOLNITS. 3. Nt*oCIS BEM. UTKITYCORWAIIELFACMES. 3051210 AFOPROMSMF.MVST BE MUTUALLY RESOLVI O eY THE MIIEY COMAMSS 4.. FOR CONERCL.swcwALILmeIIIIB HYDRANT SHALL M NAM WT111MI1M NosormK m.* VnLBMW�SRIOL$100/0 w,c ) MAMNr 018118616NK111L01RT TOA11RWuwary DxAiFM ON 7MCW) CALIFORNIA STATE CODE COMPLIANCE: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL. BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OP THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES: CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (INCLUDING TITLES 21 & 23)2010 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES WHICH ADOPTS THE 2010 UDC, 2010 UMC, 2010 UPC AND THE 2010 NEC. BUILDING OFFICIALS & CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA) 2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ANSUEIA•222-F UFE SAFETY CODE NEPA-101 2010 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 2010 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE 2010 LOCAL BUILDING CODE CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY 15 UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HAITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 CAUFORNIA BUILDING CODE. FCC NOTE: THIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR RADIO FREQUENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT OF 1996 AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS AND ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY STATE OR FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES. TP -07 CROWN NG WEST, INC. n�rrpAM SRa Y—,,EMIR 46.4+.1•, CCI l641.0O414664.11063 COAYPUAMS COAflnLCOMWIMATIO'.1 10$1416.6•66066 234 066.4641f3133 MOM MN NOIRIA0Y19R0RSUM0R TRC 0104344003004722 .01N TUTS SCT *O NM.. R 66013V4T61114143 0044034404 pC00 C0341.34:31134.10 .43.3110.4. ANY 096011 OIOW3IZ COSSATION nSM RELATLS TOV 4130..4 19 SMOLT 13003030 047, 40 AT LUST Top DAYS Man MORO Uwe OWrra 0.444,E4T IiKRRTF • TP -07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT( ANTENNA POLE SIS ON DATE ST 440' CA OF KNGWOOD RO CITY OF TEMECULA, CA NOTES AGR 112/27/12 7T Y, 2 OF 9 B TP -07 10401304 itoe. 4. /J4CROWN NG WEST, INC. 3313374114•131•C• UT G >0 1..P•.rry CCI 11U0:0041..1G.T10.S CCNMIANT1 CACn4LO0A1Wi0'AmAs siameihe anemone. menmee 01WIa1R.4.505400aMO110e 0 IN07%7401, 114001 TLN31a S01n %4303 TS ttOMlETARVNA L TO77008•MV ANT1e0G 0150.0301510153531•4TflM., 010.1lTATES 1O Ax )1, COAL AT 0434 rv0 Dc10u DATOU010 1--71.01713Oa.%101•T 13101• J earn 00111 • 1..wOM.vla w.� TP -07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET UGHTIANTENNA POLE SIS ON DATE ST 440• Ca. OF KINGWOOD RD CITY OF TEMECULA, CA DETAILS ) AGR 12/27/12 TTS 3OF9 B DISCONNECT BOX mistdid :....�,.,.,..�, .,,.,,%„ ANDREW ION-M7P / 7P / EU (704, Main Type: Fixed • Factory Installed main lugs, l•Phaso (0024L70RB) SWOPE 0 Or 3C14,E43E5flE51.O Pw,w 3w55 4043 ?04MULTI•BAND, MULTIAPERATOR REMOTE mow••, v« 11313100 50,4,45-.444..4w.a+< 344, e.4,,..4.5.4 ram Wyr 310W •41a'^M"u OPTICAL SYSTEM w.13.p13.. genet ca wa....•T.4-•,...1.e,....• 12000N42M i1 044ce..4b4.4. 40 5.01.013 u x.•.•10.044 pa/ r.<•T•v.... ,,. • •b.,p...,. D•Ww#d•MOS 31,41m1.14.A4,,w..ro.+o I.5.311.54.4461I3II4 •TA. •R.%• w,41.11ww1.44 ,w,.wAR.,•.,. :32.03••••••1141.1.317.1•14A•..q.,wM 504541.3.,41. 45 04310 C.A•RO.. Aw.. �. ✓r, m+1 0OTR1.wW 133..1.. 100 WE ?Ow,* u•,. 1701 Big •.f• a. N sm t1 133.re MONT 14,0v Fe 4:4,10011 G1100 1k AA 0.'OKDO•,• Can.,. 4.4•01 4.3.4 G1T00 151.: 105 Yet co•nxd b, eta 0wwa40. E%m•1 n, pw.v Fri du.. 1 .wn%w.•••s (( 1.11 1I 1 Lu 41.100 ,--..• �•� .s •M,ymw„w:A..11 1......•1......•••A.•.�• ...rilimIR 1137 ••~� L-1 X11• I,Y'wb.,A. 70.404 1MVY.Md1\OKRA0,0PN 0114156x111 ?WOO. Q 1311.01x061 OAuO From e03.4.O.nl.wn Wa'L3.0N 30 (441 03.mb1105 0 =Mod& 1 •'f ..34.774.5.4714.44.4141•41 •••w ,.clwww..A1••.1.m .�4' 113611:33e_311__1a 1.77:77 ,w...a..0.7”.4 •Y•• .•O,55 wMawO •0,a 004.040'3040 GAww•.w0.•0Y•oaf go. 'C 1.43150 T •«p...w: Mow wawdb„O. ,43.,1 5001077 VEYtlttt ?Mb MtFw 7N %0 PI' .044 �- )a 55. M<x 017..1 40143401 • 114554144434•tl•we451105444•454/ !9E Nw,1,tl•upw w.. O44,4OYf,6 a VIII KaMmap 6345500E 0 40 3? 31 '.• 0•45.5 .W4001e(11414)44w404 COMA 43 40 3? 34 O r45.44444.14.,1114•4 44144401w100e 00318 43 40 3? Y j� [ 2 ra�/u 334 4 LIE 0 40 1{J�� I 1 I qt/ TYPICAL EQUIPMENT ASSEMBLY AMPHENOL 24" PANEL ANTENNA ANTENNA MOUNTING FLANGE MtXCWW63111414Fx00) ION11171D•19V DISCONNECT BOX 0TRA1GHT LEG 8N60LE BOLT SRAM 11 ''., T 131....+••1, M 1.134, 1 CAOLE FEEDER �� INET ENGUlEE0.FD RVARA IS FROM.at w�• go Ir Ft .L, M w . NMI 110 n IIII NTENNA MANUfnCIURF YOrw.. I. •,.,1313 • MM.r Iw1 �•103 :SS 11r••.,w.0r •.. 1 • w wiA.qme 131..01. 01 ' V. L11r.w..74•r.�, .13.,.w101A..,� l . - 0 11 4.13..«..... • 1 ir •8106 rw.6..3•..1• .• 40-0• r 74.13.. A 1\ A r•.1.•1•= 4.13•..,,7 ,.... j �,1a.Iw1• 11355.g1.•741.10w 1370• 0437 0413 Fri 14 73 141 I31 :1 TP -07 10401304 itoe. 4. /J4CROWN NG WEST, INC. 3313374114•131•C• UT G >0 1..P•.rry CCI 11U0:0041..1G.T10.S CCNMIANT1 CACn4LO0A1Wi0'AmAs siameihe anemone. menmee 01WIa1R.4.505400aMO110e 0 IN07%7401, 114001 TLN31a S01n %4303 TS ttOMlETARVNA L TO77008•MV ANT1e0G 0150.0301510153531•4TflM., 010.1lTATES 1O Ax )1, COAL AT 0434 rv0 Dc10u DATOU010 1--71.01713Oa.%101•T 13101• J earn 00111 • 1..wOM.vla w.� TP -07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET UGHTIANTENNA POLE SIS ON DATE ST 440• Ca. OF KINGWOOD RD CITY OF TEMECULA, CA DETAILS ) AGR 12/27/12 TTS 3OF9 B TP -07 J CROWN . r f 1 NG WEST, INC. 0115 W1yMA..510A TCA104 J 1M.M0.10Y CCI �- IILCC011...1AT140 LTAYOLTA rs OUSIALE04MN40.111 MSS MI. 01.20 (111111414 IROMMTA0Y130'OIXVg4 1401S00NA00.Y(OY1RN0WM4t O1 MMWMU111 AT 0.4122.T0 COMMENT. 10 VERNON .112600 reXt02.10 0114.1.4 AS !mums 116[44. N ITI1013.100141MILP 1..0,116 .U.AT LEAST MIO OATS BEFORE TOO PO 4'0120604101LLT1(O 211101 01611. MIS TP -07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT IANTENNA POLE SIS ON DATE ST 440' CIL OF Ke1GW000 RO CRY OF TEMECULA. CA C DETAILS ) Llai 112/27/12 -TT' 4 OF 9 B GENERAL SPECIACA710Ne KATHREIN SCALA `ERECpBNTRWM"1MM1` SCE APPROVED BvrlMdrM.n2 R`ICE e1""'oei rlollono.l w°wi,w« .a.1Ar1M ... .0024000 (MP .1 .21002210.1 .2RECT.I4.21.4.+101/1 MIR . 11?PQP.. 14100 13402I2.10 443 4.....100.41 MOM{ 0.0. 61.44 R10.M ......11.00.414141 04Pw. Y01 02./...... 140000//1 Potru0140 m.4 41t 1.21114 s1.....214•13•124.0 ROO - 102'41 METER PEDESTAL �41g6 OWN •Wield 460.500.6. MA. M.. 0.4.10.40..1 10411`0 s`1.02.s�lia.Pi s UM .Y-2- , v r 0102.4 M 10'01,®® , "'.1• r OOC2YArM40/4011610 c- a_Y 111111Y Wp.O 141CIo.4rr. wurar Ur/ CO WWI TNHAMM • OOTl11 Y0M 1101!0.0 0.44130001/ 1.-� 1 F2NKo0AMK • (114153 0{1 CONI *AU OOG 10 mom., 1.51.0.E .1vn<00M�f 1 II IT 2 OP 0I 1V W 1► 1/1 112 11.. OA4Mr pl 'Y q •Y N • Y W 1.000!01 r.1 W034MwMwl u•MY/000SU 1l P2u r0/.L2 .4A -1R .B4.t144nUy 2r•,421MAFO 6Y(WOrsp 1O 0010 mow.111.11021 rrME MI RIO0H�•1 1 Y.w 0• 421LOBE64.211C61011M2 Y b r ♦ Y I0 1 0• 5• Re ! rMT 0JiT00[TOV.F Y 100044 1r u 141 1 II M 10 0 1l 16 I1 0 IrTR11M 1W1ptOr01SECTOR MOI Mom IVOmsRr1CLL IDaI1.031.14 .. - 1, Rlwen 1���1 wen CIAO O0•30,1J �` �'WOA1s IDEWsw Gix3L0O NCO RN(N1TVPW 1101Ar1w1 MRA6T01E. .0 x40 Hite I lxul- I11ens1r. a .4a m 6 2rT TYPICAL ANTENNA ASSEMBLY 4r4roc.CON 00CS.0000 Y KATIIREPIANIEfwA dOalOtro rMC NATHREIN AMENS SERVIOEAREA BOP10QT0PlOtrIllt FWNo �ae(erEEoen SPUTTER asCPUSE LN rT.1•I. J «- 177- Iji� BASE ENCLOSED W CONCRETE OW.. ...,e •1..•.H MOUNTING --IA - rr-11 BASE 1 001....11.11.01.07.20002M. 1 P.00.0.0.1........... DETAIL lab= Frims I e 1 `; TP -07 J CROWN . r f 1 NG WEST, INC. 0115 W1yMA..510A TCA104 J 1M.M0.10Y CCI �- IILCC011...1AT140 LTAYOLTA rs OUSIALE04MN40.111 MSS MI. 01.20 (111111414 IROMMTA0Y130'OIXVg4 1401S00NA00.Y(OY1RN0WM4t O1 MMWMU111 AT 0.4122.T0 COMMENT. 10 VERNON .112600 reXt02.10 0114.1.4 AS !mums 116[44. N ITI1013.100141MILP 1..0,116 .U.AT LEAST MIO OATS BEFORE TOO PO 4'0120604101LLT1(O 211101 01611. MIS TP -07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT IANTENNA POLE SIS ON DATE ST 440' CIL OF Ke1GW000 RO CRY OF TEMECULA. CA C DETAILS ) Llai 112/27/12 -TT' 4 OF 9 B TP -07 • 2 Iwo !IWROWN GA.', NG WEST, INC. 21119.-*n2TAO Le Vat, CA 21250 AloAnewerA262. CCI 111.030202177311061 Om'RLUNI3 COASTALCOMIANICA1p:1 111111.1 An Se 11L 0022N.Of9014 IMe IM91•0 II101MlTARY I012R11.211001 0tP1010411000M3AI9201%nR 9E2 Of 12IIAMTM9919 ISCIAALTAAT Alm CORNOLMIK TO VHLMOk A. MECO DISCLOSURE 000A MAN At R MLSTM 20.62 \I991ML1LYMpDBREO 1.01n.N00 CAILAT LUST SMD DAYS WOK VW Oq U9ARGROV60 WWI AMRT TXAATI TOP. ,mn ttYMILMesid 10 22211 TP -07 STEEL TEXTURE° STREET LIGHT/ ANTENNA POLE 59 ON DATE ST 441' CA. OF KINGWOOD RD CITY OF TEMECULA. CA ( DETAILS ) /TA AGR 12/27/12 ionwWn\ TT -5OF9 B 24" x 36" FIBER SPLICE BOX TYPICAL GROUND DETAIL GROUND ROD DETAIL. POLYMER CONCRETE ASSEMBLY • STRAI:IT NOES, NO FLOOR, WUC 26••701(.• S/8' HEX BOLTS. CROWN CASTLE LOO°•EMBOSSED•(BPECIFY AT AME OF ORDER) INSTALLED. LOAD 1055: WITH STUB -UP 12% 14 CONCRETE UTILITY BOX WTCOYER ' TEXTURED STEEL POLE DRIA iUT'nELL , r ORAOLUNtF .% S/2 AW0 I I. —_i 1' INCIDENTAL TRAFFIC -PARKING LOT. SIDEWALKWIICJ OD/OLEER ASTMC95/ CONFORMS T • ANSVSCIE 77 PEATURF5 DROP-IN APPROVED DROP-IN • SKID RESISTANT COVER AINLEASSTEELBO BSTAINLESS CAST.IN F OATINGBOLTS R EORATNQNli BOX -INTEGRAL GRAN FINIS%Il FIBER SPLICE BOX SHALL BE IABELED CROWN CASTLE COMM • EQUIPMENT WITH RACK WITH UWSTRUT FOR FIBER SPIKE MOUNTING + \ ,T IL \ :• \ \\ I • // //'`;'• �..1 �> �• �l�AF�Y �B®7f.YY_=_di'JR r - liBiliall 2• MOPE C•I<R FIBER CADWELO TYPE 'OY•MOLO y. IE9• COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD 1 I 1 rCOPPER CVD OROAIOROO 1• SCII40 TO EI ECIRICAL, NETER PEDESTAL a ui;- 110 `L;' 11 a--T`A NOTICE SIGNAGE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM PANEL SCHEDULE SOALFMTS PROPOSED METER PEDESTAL XIIL MTA 100A. 120/240V. mow 42.000NC (MYERS POWER PRODUCT) IIgA�)(00A 2P 27 JM'4,A0650 PANEL •A• }y •. Ila. KILTS 1 AM J TARE IUM ILO TWT____"123, / 1 NOTICE 3 0 i I E '0/ NOS RMlA111-A R ` 3 RMI HMEARFSe AID -°"RX O -RA r951 -..-3,...._i Am ADL.- 110 A-� AN AMII. 91 1 I' –.—A R (\\� \\ U� Redo frequency gelds beyond thio point may exceed the FCC general public exposure Ilnet. . ANN IN 1N • ` r....w... \..` ~�I .m. uw J - TLA • �� PS �� -- GROUND ROD �•� - 0—IL Me ma Air[ WC UNDERGROUND TRENCH TO SCE VAULT 0 !KMA. FIC 5100S.N10 ��� won1,31.0/-11IOA WAN PANEL .A. 1100 N k 1.25 T7b0 W _�( MAL MITE KATT . _um_ tM/L IDAR 1MTT . __ 39•41•2 OND 20A 1 UTILITY FONTS O SEAV.CEANO WORK! MATERIALSSHONTI ARE BASED 1.992/4 PRELIMINARY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY COAPAN/5S AND ARE FEN BIO PURPOSES ONLY. 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANY FCR FNA. AND EXACT WORK/ MATERIALS REQUNELIENTS AND CONSTRUCT TO UTILITY COMPANY ENGINEERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ONLY CONTRACTOR SWILL FURNISH AND NBTKL ALL CONDUIT. PULL ROPES. CARMEL/EL BOXES, CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF CONDUIT (F REQUIRED). TRANSFORMER PAD, BARR1ERe. POLE RISERS TRENCHING. BACKFLL PAY ALLUTLITY COMPANY PEES ANOINCLUOE AU. RECWREMENTS N SCOPE OF WORK © KEYNOTES: POLE GROUND ROO- O O O 2•3e1141*MG L0UAREO1OAD CENTER e002�LTORB WOUMIOO MBREAKERS 0052.41 0itECRJAL WO.T2N211N2G L'P. E° 314.O102 OND TO POLE GROUND R00 40WAD • O AOWRU O• ANDREW • O ION NOC TEL #: $O0-788-7811 TP -07 1121 i 1131 NITI 1141 TP -07 • 2 Iwo !IWROWN GA.', NG WEST, INC. 21119.-*n2TAO Le Vat, CA 21250 AloAnewerA262. CCI 111.030202177311061 Om'RLUNI3 COASTALCOMIANICA1p:1 111111.1 An Se 11L 0022N.Of9014 IMe IM91•0 II101MlTARY I012R11.211001 0tP1010411000M3AI9201%nR 9E2 Of 12IIAMTM9919 ISCIAALTAAT Alm CORNOLMIK TO VHLMOk A. MECO DISCLOSURE 000A MAN At R MLSTM 20.62 \I991ML1LYMpDBREO 1.01n.N00 CAILAT LUST SMD DAYS WOK VW Oq U9ARGROV60 WWI AMRT TXAATI TOP. ,mn ttYMILMesid 10 22211 TP -07 STEEL TEXTURE° STREET LIGHT/ ANTENNA POLE 59 ON DATE ST 441' CA. OF KINGWOOD RD CITY OF TEMECULA. CA ( DETAILS ) /TA AGR 12/27/12 ionwWn\ TT -5OF9 B TP -07 CROWN i I 1 NG WEST, INC. MM.* STECO I. Ym,CA01155 ...0.ve1N ovP ti.I.r14 CCI -� TO.ECOMWNCATIOOA CarouTAVTS COASTAL EOSNO14 CATIMY >H511S0MO* HP Om.1.06NIE P101T51HN t PROPRIETARY 04,011441111N TOE IW O TIATION(Ot TAIhIO IN MIS SLI Of ORASVMS ¢ PROPRIETARY ARD 0O.1TD4TNL TO 06L66}l ANT1/MOS DIs .141OO+.LM.6nnlllnCiuLVASO'IIIMFlo r1 TP -07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE S/S ON DATE ST 440' C(L OF KNGWOOD RO CITY OF TEMECULA, CA ( POLE PROFILE AGR 112/23%72 TT Warm 6OF9 B MAKE READY IIINAIIp(MT6 NOLMN 60610)10 .. • 1 �..,..... r SECTOR I T::::' '1>V A/MM._PAR I R AI 1 CAMAS 6E6/ANIr162110 . 1 ) ,ER,lPR0 STEEL UR/UM STREET LTGOTlANTEINA POLE NEW CONSTRUCTION CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL NEW 37 TEXTURED STEEL POLE INSTALL CIRCUIT BREAKER AT T O•. INSTALL 12) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9OCLOCK AND] (CLOCK POSITION AT IST INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON 111E 9 (BEDECK AND 3 DCIECK POSITION AT 16 T. UATALL (1) PANEL ANTENNAS ATC/ 120. t 210• AZIMUTHS WITH A RAD COMA OF 2? e. INSTALL (I) TRS SECTOR ANTENNA ON TOP OF POLE INSTALL (I) M. . M. FIBER SPLICE BO% INSTALL(]) GROUND TEST WEDS, INSTALL(]) GROUND RODS INSTALL (I) ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL NOTES: TOP OF TEXTURED STEEL POLE: 370. ANTENNA TYPE (1) KATHREIN TRI SECTOR 711? (3)AUPHENOL PANEL 232• X 120.X 7.1• A25LNTIBR0.l /20`/140° 1 ., ,.. ;_.....rd ' ~ :\ry":.`$I.�, � \ 1. �\�\b�?v��\�\ • IDSt Nt4'� /�j\�'j6; \1\ J .,j/4 r; . //V/\ � / `1 • , :-Y4.\,//§//eV V SITU POLL 1 1 `I. i >,�,{,� ;..:Fill 0 S�. ��S:ti'��, ) nit IA \ W,AUAIO �O,,..kt \ \ 9. "0 gyp. AQP 0' O \ 'fes°� 240', i 1 I0- 120° �--+-90. A 112 O'CLOCK VIEW I ETAtL-N•.P.• B I ANTENNA DETAILS I I TP -07 CROWN i I 1 NG WEST, INC. MM.* STECO I. Ym,CA01155 ...0.ve1N ovP ti.I.r14 CCI -� TO.ECOMWNCATIOOA CarouTAVTS COASTAL EOSNO14 CATIMY >H511S0MO* HP Om.1.06NIE P101T51HN t PROPRIETARY 04,011441111N TOE IW O TIATION(Ot TAIhIO IN MIS SLI Of ORASVMS ¢ PROPRIETARY ARD 0O.1TD4TNL TO 06L66}l ANT1/MOS DIs .141OO+.LM.6nnlllnCiuLVASO'IIIMFlo r1 TP -07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE S/S ON DATE ST 440' C(L OF KNGWOOD RO CITY OF TEMECULA, CA ( POLE PROFILE AGR 112/23%72 TT Warm 6OF9 B TP -07 CCI - FILECOMNV.KAi,OAY OCC(1411A413 EO3RMEOw4Mt747IP S MSMo. A/144. 444011.436 w10emaTA.V INIOI MATIUN 711E 1VOENATg1=RAMOR4T S Ser OFOMTP.DST1• fl*TAPV AND 30.Nr100111AL MODULO): ANV USE oft 01RYASUt OT Ilk THAN AS T RELATES TO MGM T SMOLT r11010NI1O 1 WLI ^.;p LOAM -MO Own WOO/ TOO MO 1.0.01510140l/TO ALG, `roar l WOO v3aanaiPEw 1�1 or.m, Iva P., TP -07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT I ANTENNA POLE SIS ON DATE ST 445 CA OF KINOWOOD RD CITY OF TEMECULA• CA POLE PROFILE r-... AGR 12%27/12 ..il.e'3.,r, .rr Ream* 7OF9 B (I)IATN 4414 AN 010.1 TOP OF 9EAVICEAIIG AT), TOP OFOIXEATur DIA4 AMKENot PAP[1 NR004.49 MO SOLI 110 MO : la SECTOR ERA wire I 1 Il. • I , lOP0P Y1a1CL MEA AT )r IOPOF PqE Ar 3zr (3124 AMPNNATL PANEL ANTENNAS 01004SYR302130 V' IIA flows, Al f 4POLT tU1 =TOO I' I 1 A I ' ..a •... ' • ! 1 F F I icrn.vL•.1 I T1I1tATNAffIlIPON 4.10.144110(1)NAfl 4.10.144110•eoE-faro ( ' „ I o =TOO I TOP OF SERVICE AMA An1• TOP Of POET AM., • A3124 MW'ILNGL GAVEL �.I • ltnNAa eAceni:•621'0 X TEA04L0 SI ELL K%f .11 i I 9 M c.. , 1.1 IT TAINHO9 MMM CaCUT ORE" ofr i,* : I I I RPKA}pUr, _i elr roP rwonAi rz' rr ,2 4 L 4�?Zvp♦`A♦i ,% rI'/ ' 'P � ry�'Jf/.�(� Jr����FeM9PElCROaL`lli.\`ll� •\4'. j�♦i \ /• \- ��\./.,,,,b.45.l,'\P!'3E M6iwLAATTIC,C4, 44..,��" V� :;r�\��C�Crlo 4 ( :• Ci t"7\.: � es. ����♦ � d "O"\i ' .. ♦ \ a'4*. �4. 'Ps,/ reel .�IiQ �tMiEEar r r , �/�i A E? � . at �'` 1 ♦ r' 8♦•MdEFOTEfT. 1. • ,4, r '\,,.`o` \, ,I P✓1, -`;'% ��yA' % �% ♦ ,C • 3 r'o» r 2. 3 % �� �� v � ♦♦♦��`%i�✓/i��. • ♦ S.:' LG�r, `C'\ V ^ 0a0l/1bKtrLSIII. ��yC�r`YY, :';:,j • :Z. \ ' ♦ ��;r♦\Q /,' iz , l - �\4 ' "' r G✓i/r 401`yi0 � C ♦` PION ,,,,..?4.5....$1.,./, `,.. '. �$S{ 0' . l ylr,' i�• �j\,y¢y� `♦ ♦`G . �Y� �'G`♦i`i ¢ r q • ri EE\R4az" prlt ; �•aa//�`(�♦l TO4I. .ate• ••Q�+ `p,„.rt k4��4 E I 9 O'CLOCK VIEW I SCM,O. 1q••3V` C 13 O'CLOCK VIEW 1 •CA3E•19••mt. D I 6 O'CLOCK VIEW .1 Atom -u•- .- TP -07 CCI - FILECOMNV.KAi,OAY OCC(1411A413 EO3RMEOw4Mt747IP S MSMo. A/144. 444011.436 w10emaTA.V INIOI MATIUN 711E 1VOENATg1=RAMOR4T S Ser OFOMTP.DST1• fl*TAPV AND 30.Nr100111AL MODULO): ANV USE oft 01RYASUt OT Ilk THAN AS T RELATES TO MGM T SMOLT r11010NI1O 1 WLI ^.;p LOAM -MO Own WOO/ TOO MO 1.0.01510140l/TO ALG, `roar l WOO v3aanaiPEw 1�1 or.m, Iva P., TP -07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT I ANTENNA POLE SIS ON DATE ST 445 CA OF KINOWOOD RD CITY OF TEMECULA• CA POLE PROFILE r-... AGR 12%27/12 ..il.e'3.,r, .rr Ream* 7OF9 B TP -07 1 /ACROWN NG WEST, INC. 1111M'0., Me SEC. „Wv�YCA 91M kem Pam 1. .1M CCI 1CLCCO,&OlAAA1A1.S COARSLIAMI COMMIALONINRO MICOS 17(017S1 RH Th MflI 1AAYIMOUMIIDN ale V Il MOJIOSS?RO IA,O IN TINS p SC1 urimmoS IS MOMIEfAAV LA0 OGC1OS IIL.IO VLPI[MI A UAhIS OISCIOSI1.E 011.13ttY AS IT MUMS 101a%.CO SSISILI. IROM4a0 r OM. .a! TP -0T STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHTI ANTENNA POLE SIS ON DATE ST 440' CIL OF KINOWOODRD CITY OF TEMECUTA, CA POWER DESIGN A,R 1121"17712 '' " TT 8 OF 9 B �:. e9�31�Y✓ '• y �Lr / :/ W .Sri. 'y _ . ef YPROPOSED NODE LOCATION - '.2_•, ----- - - KEY MAP 11 110 O'CLOCK VIEW a • i'• .. may y' •i 1 ,+r. - A + PROPOSED NODE LOCATION !IIOi5 Mt.! t.'.• ' - .. s C 1 12 O'CLOCK VIEW D 1 3 O'CLOCK VIEW TP -07 1 /ACROWN NG WEST, INC. 1111M'0., Me SEC. „Wv�YCA 91M kem Pam 1. .1M CCI 1CLCCO,&OlAAA1A1.S COARSLIAMI COMMIALONINRO MICOS 17(017S1 RH Th MflI 1AAYIMOUMIIDN ale V Il MOJIOSS?RO IA,O IN TINS p SC1 urimmoS IS MOMIEfAAV LA0 OGC1OS IIL.IO VLPI[MI A UAhIS OISCIOSI1.E 011.13ttY AS IT MUMS 101a%.CO SSISILI. IROM4a0 r OM. .a! TP -0T STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHTI ANTENNA POLE SIS ON DATE ST 440' CIL OF KINOWOODRD CITY OF TEMECUTA, CA POWER DESIGN A,R 1121"17712 '' " TT 8 OF 9 B NSTALI STE[i 160+06EO SMUT WMT/ANTRIM POLE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL VAULT (5' E.O.C.) STA. 94+96 INSTALL ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL (SE O.C.) STA. 94 • 89 EXISTING STREETLIGHT (2 B O.C.) STA 94+60 EXISTING SCE HANDHOLE REPLACE WITH NEIN 1T' X 30' HAND HOLE STA. 94+59 NODE COORONAIE UflT VE. 14141672 IOM111L+ .,11159161 • \ APN #916142028 APN #916360006 INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (2 B O.C.) 8TA95+63 APN #916380007 DETAIL 'A' APN #916360016 APN #916360014 SITE LOCATION INSTALL STEEL TEXTURED ANTENNA POLE ti (7 BO.C.) STA 95.60 DATE ST STA 1 INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (2'80C) STA 95 + 57 INSTALL FIBER SPLICE EOX (78 O.C) STA 05+54 TA 1 NORTI M SCALE: 1" = 20' TP -07 UAW. CROWN .1.', 1; NG WEST, INC. lRfvl;p,A., 6IEL9 twv.l.sMYS CCI TEMONfMM11018 COOVAIMri COANAL CON W EIICAI IP\1 .Uf M+iw A•esk.9N IMMO vlmtsA+w EROMCMY1.011 AIWY IIMh1O6IATIOYCONTADIOIN 7111 sE101.DMwt. IMOVIDMARTAM ORK O MEOI FATNAN MR RELAlli TOMJIM Asfl MTLY IRONIY.fD CAll. AT MATT MO O.0 MTORE S7lW dtOO1M69XSALAI /A 4C,l6rrnl,.,. 7-J TP.07 STEEL TEXTURED STREET UGIT/ANTENNA POLE 915 ON DATE ST 440' CIL OF KINGWOOD RD CITY OF TEMECULA. CA SITE PLAN 12/27/17. 9 0F 9 TT B CROWN (A STI �L TI ^ NG WEST, INC. TP -20 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE S/E CORNER OF REDHAWK PKWY & EL CHIMISAL 76' C/L EL CHIMISAL RD/ TEHACHAPI PASS CITY OF TEMECULA, CA GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE 10B SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME AAAI NOM NL[IRA GOBS WR "PO VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL NEW 32' TEXTURED STEEL POLE. CROWN CASTLE TO MATCH SURROUNDING MAST ARM AND LUMINARE TO NEWS TEXTURED STEEL POLE. INSTALL CIRCUIT BREAKER AT 7' 0'. INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9 O'CLOCK AND 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 12' 7'. INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9 OCLOCK ANO 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 18' T. INSTALL (3) 24' AMPNENOL PANEL ANTENNAS #696.898/1710-2170 AT 0' I 120.1240' AZIMUTHS WITH A RAD CENTER OF 27' 0'. INSTALL (1) KATHREIN TRI SECTOR ANTENNA 0800.10270 ON TOP OF POLE. INSTALL (1) 24' x 38' FIBER SPLICE BOX. INSTALL (2) GROUND TEST WELLS. INSTALL (2) GROUND RODS. INSTALL (1) METER PEDESTAL. PROJECT SUMMARY FEET NUMBER: DESCRIPTKIN I TITLE MEET 2 NOTES !DETAILS 3 NOTES A 0E7AIS 4 NOTES *DETAILS 1 NOTES &MAKS 4 POLENIOFILE FINAL SCE IOWSADPSgN E FINAL SCE POWER DESIGN • 100P11010S U SHE MAN II T/LATTEC 0211I0LCOVEIEEIf T 12 UNTIE CONTROLPIAN 11 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAIT SHEET INDEX PROJECT MANAGER: CROWN CASTLE 1100 DEXTER AVENUE STE250 SEATTLE, WA 98109 STEVE WEINOARDT (805) 235.1431 STEVEN, WEINGARDT@CROW NCASTLECOM NODE ENGINEER: COASTAL COMMUNICATIONS 3355 MISSION AVE, STE.234 OCEANSIDE, CA. 92058 TODD THREW (760) 754.9240 EXT. 101 TODDWCOASTALCOMMINC.COM CONSTRUCTTON MANAGER: CROWN CASTLE 1100 DEXTER AVENUE STE 250 SEATTLE, WA 98109 STEVE PATINO (805) 234.1431 STEPHEN.PATINO,CONIRACTOR@CROW NCASTLE.COM JAN 1 4 2013 µ0P 4° c.b\Iwr, PROJECT TEAM TP -20 ThIOCUU GO NERO. 142829 l VICROITN NC WEST, INC. Y.SCA 91u.Ea IA217911A w..u.wks. CCI YELEAStAINOXATIONY COATN.TANIS tOAITALOOOROOCATOH INS 14•IrAw2 21. :N'—bf.1R11 IIAOt00 9/OTSR IAA/ P101WA1 % nslwgWANON° `'TA EDINURS SET Or 0AAETATS ISpIpNMAAYA\9 001(RED11AL TO WARM ANY U OL ONCLOSUILLROASTS :ovtpWPV KI MENNnoIHIS1NO TI 140401.!09 CALLA. REM wM 1.1003 `L TRAVAIL Atlas wet /0000.11rtlilitYkr“. DUN. AODWITAASLI 101.11111.011 ti�.wv TP -20 9110.tORYIIL04TIIL'61 UGIIT/N IMNPOLI COItllAd1001914M! R A'S•J.AL TEM Y ELCNSILL RNTO IEIGIAN PASS COWIE TE/RCUMCA TITLE SHEET AGR 10Wt. affinTa 9.18.12 TTS 1/4. 1 OF 13 D ( NOTES ) LEGEND YS MDOL DESCRIPTION O • ^Tr MX= nil YAM ICC9ewM[ A60INSDUR (AINGUI LOM AMMR.UHOTMMMCRO DUCT FOOTAOES ABBREVIATIONS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: T8S ,11Y ellOSIONSLONENTCONTROL.M104t TO COMPLETION Orr MALOIIIIOYWQRS.SIIAU.80 rEIVORMEOBY MLCON1MCTORORQ&alnIDPERSQVAMPOKAl80 BELOW: 1 ALLRBQUIREMQRB OE ME CITY OF TEMECULA 'LAND OW0.01M07T MANUALBrORM WATER STA/MAROS-WVRRIMC(*POM D IMOTI60F31CNANO C[R4STRUCTS1OETIf.1R010SE11RFI1C IMMovtMEMScoNTISMNTWTM THE EROSIONCONTROLNLANAMGOR man roiumoo comm. LLAMTWPOry.R AMLKAOLL E.T01S,01W 08001 MLBR, mmmoVENIS GRAVEL 0A03141 SAWN 110M4MAILY LIrlTRCARIMINLET.ES WOICAFWQYREAIA 3.117ECOM AC= OA QUAL MEDPLATONSHALL De 32.31,07431617 FOR=AMP MSAT ANGMUDON ADIMLNTSTREATIS)ANDSRMI ORNNSYST W DUE TOCD`IERUCIHAYACTIVIIY. 4 1HE CON TRACTOR SKALL REMOVE 54.T AND 001II13 AMR FACM A W OA MOQALL S.EQUIPMENTAMO W088ERSIORSNUIGD.Ta0I)11LNULLBE MACS &VARAKRAtALLTBII*OVt0A1 NIRAMY SEASON E NECO.YRAROR SHALL RSSTORE ALL EROSI0NSEDAIEM CONTROL DEVICES To WMIKMO ORM& To RII/ABIMACI 201 /UM EIO/EER W MAW/ IODRLDO' NTA utmultolirmobUssucl RA8 *LL T. THICONIRACFORSNALLT5TALL A1101110WAL ER0310L98007E.NT COMRM.MEASURES AS MAY DE Rr01RREDOY W18RE1)ENT FNOMLLADIEMUNFOAESED1 CACUNISTANCFS.WHICH Mr ARISE rccono MYoMPTRCOERWLWAYRR/ROv1 DMITM.MFtpNDDERONMIMtL.eoa 4 Ot MCOI V OEATFD IEREON. AL EROt10M tGDIMQI T CANROL FOR WENS. COMMONS SMALL BE ODI[ TO THE SATISFACTION OP TIIEREBDBNT En13047131. 9. AL REMOVAOUIR0RCTIVOOEVICOS SHOWS MIM40E114 PEACE AT TEE NO OFEACH WGRRw OAY WHEHRAMI5IMMKNT 10. TH€COMMCIOR SNALLAMAMOEtOA &MALY MIt11NOS QVU IOOROS" 1ST TO AIIILNN TCR PROTECT TEAM IGENQIALCONTRACTORQUALRILD ISMS. MORON CONTROL M C001MCTOEIF An 87700412 M WORR.OW tVf VILWtA /WPM R8iCOa SWARM EVAUTAR111UOKOACY Of IREFA0810M3WE.18MTCONTROL MEASURES AMOM-BAATEDCM15TOUC000ACINIBES STORMDRAIN INLET PROTECTION EDGE OF PAVEMENT SPILLWAY, I -BAG HIGH FLAW SANDBAG 2 -BAGS HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH OPPOSING FLOW DIRECTIONS EDGE OF PAVEMENTINL ET } FLOW .-.._... ' SPILLWAY. 1-BAO HI088 SANDBAG 2 -BAGS HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH SINGLE FLOW DIRECTION, NOTES: 1. IMENDPD FOR MIORT -70874 USE 2. U4101201221ITNON•OTDMIWAI0I FLOW. 3. ALLOW FOR PROPEL PMTNTENANCE AND REAMR 4. BADS MUST BE REMOVED ASTER ADJACENTOKRAF10O IS COMPLETED E HOTAPFLICABLBM AREAS WITH 111011 SW93 ANOCLAYS WITHOUT FILTER FABRIC. NOTES: 9 CMIINW10R IO 7.0mM! MAMMY C117769N0S 2 GOMRACIOP TO RAG 3A1.OBA09403U 14819MORM WWI MILER Top,EvEHt COMANA479(0 WMT" 3 117.02E PRE WLL BE COWAEO AND CMITMIEDANO Mt ET WEL K SNOT AHOCLINRO AB IEEMO CONIMCTMI TOM.. 0410080 KIRK TO THE 8ATEFACTIoNOF THE CHV &SOHO" & 033111.0017131101111100TICITONPIACOIOBWMR TON MNA41D TO TM WSW*. co Mart mogul M CO4TRACIM95HM1RE910Rc INE ROADNAYBAOK TO R901109ULCMGTKH LLU VA.CTORY IO M C9tt UOMIS31 MOLW•810.11X80 VITRO 20 MEM B911772•1 1901802029100I300.10008900200300.80190002* T BIXWNRSMLLBIRESIOROVEPUC10 KA cur Of 1EMEL1M0TAH07R001NWMOS M.G9. OM 011/300/40 I KM510M180ERRL NOTBC D15111ReCO ROW GROUND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 000wNI COKr RUGT0.V T01HSpYRCI EAN AU. MLEIS. NAE; SrAPLE;OR N0N.3733 VOITICCALSOETNErom. AL (OAKTRV(1100ISHALL BE M ACCORDANCE WTI SIUNIC1rALCOOHTV.6tAtT. rEOfAAL.0095 AHO OOIM STAHOV IDS A?U RBGOL/0I0M CALL USA 4110075 M W R TO EACH V A1PG AT (ROD 801100 0t 811. ALLLANDSMNNO TO OIRESTOOLO TO OUGJNALCOOKST1014 OR BETTER ALL EQUIFI3R TO B8 BONOtf MITEIUNO WBEET MOUS. W CLEA9M'CEAT00080nlOtlo cAULR cAODIT A.E41 AT PA0 NORMAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: 1. IOG10. 0 OVIlIOILVIINDBIWPRM061DOIILITI0EMIITMIIWIODDtr1N1 SOMIYIDERAADSIIOWNQVAMY PLANS 31.10111-120 TOO THEOCOTM"MX WORKSTOR MMM, F CHANGES/4W D0ITAIEIIFD DY NIDEVT. Or FMK WOR1tSM CARS Or CONTLIRIHO ro41LTTS 3 COMIUCTSDEIWYLM UIIPTY CMOINIESCA0I44LT. EAISITAG AHO MAMA War M: 111.111174.1..YT Y RESOLVED DY E UTILITY COWUWET l 003434I17CIAI SREWAL AT/1E FRE MVO.. MULL OEHACED WITHIN Tie T 810 SIDEWAII IW UDRO TACEM CUW T MA%IM100ALoAMF.T"GA8MAIASWYFER ACED ROOM IIRIATRS TEENCHS9ALT I TOS79A0VAL Or CITY G001611 INr OS) CALIFORNIA STATE CODE COMPLIANCE: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES: CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (INCLUDING TITLES 24 & IS) 2810 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES WHICH ADOPTS THE 2010 UBC, 2010 UMC, 2110 UPC AND THE 2818 NEC. BUILDING OFFICIALS & CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA) 2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ANSUEIA-222-F UFE SAFETY CODE NEPA-101 2010 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 2010 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE 2010 LOCAL BUILDING CODE CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HAITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. FCC NOTE: THIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR RADIO FREQUENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT OF 1986 AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS AND ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY STATE OR FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES. 1 TP -20 320(01 A 142829 1 09T 7 NG WEST, INC. r ":.: SYMrSl 4 VW.nCAf1110 rwr WWukm Ef44F�rB0 CCI �- TELCCOMIUNICATKISS 001*CLIAMB COASTAtCOMWMCATIONT IM Om...WPM 1ST19 0O$j 1.1,51 OMI 181081[ ILLYLVOWBDOY tIRLVO1WE11ON00LETMNIDN hIRl I410 OLOIVOtRRMRMTAlYA0D COSROLMIAEIOETn10% AM OW 011 OIKL081.ER MIER RNV 0111 U44313 BOYO WMIRI9RRTL1IR0NWl8D S.IrAAM.. TP -20 Bi881 TIRYIR osnuteT LICK!) ANTENNA 001.E ER CORMS 01 MCCAW% R80210.UO10IAL/VOL EL O11.8K RDE TEHACIUPI PASS OW OF IIIMCUA CA 1 RN.KAr AGR 09.1;12 WMA aW� TT 2 OF 13 D TP -20 142829 (j /JQCROI�N W� •,i NG WEST, INC. 2115 Vy,A.>1K1 SOs.G•11.1 Ar..r11Y 341.4..10 CCI -� •EUOOMIO fCA11073 C04101.70073 QOASTAL COUM0000110 . 111534 ..S.S. 1M Oem0LC.V01 (71011344210 f1101ttTMYTMO6YT071 T1IE 04U01ATIO.Y W3TA0100 N 116 A7OI 04.110950203 *07 ATN C*410.n1141TOKw10A AMYY160O OOgAYSUAS 071111144/1 ASO MATS 10 'Ow1071 R STRICTLY 11401 0011:0 m.70 ML AT AL IMP MO 10503* WO1>t T911A000,ALEAI 7 nn4 1.6....• P110.1111./........111.....1R.f. aar.lnu4e6N.V10r.I. 0041} MI 1 Ow/ TP -20 9711:1.1IKMIEO WREST LIGHT 1N010MN POSE EIE 5011/27_. Of 3E014041 *MT a CL01MM6N MCA 01.0491ISAL R011EMLCMW PASS cora 7E4ECYlA CA C NOTES AGR 09.18.1 TT pm3 OF 13 D DISCONNECT BOX 1 ..Mb...r... ANDREW ION -MTP / 7P / EU (704, Main Type: Fixed • Factory Installed mein lugs, 1•Phase (0024L70REE WW1rOrr K+MnnueellMG Sip* 6.201 MULTI -BAND, MULTI OPERATOR REMOTE "°......4 wnf,...V. s0"Ob1'^01cSP*1Y0""' �"„A 01.11114 SW OPTICAL SYSTEM Pow PoWAY 0..1.41.. *3000 06w • OS *1* 10. sr* o..wawrcr. 00 11 w�+.cP• E100YMOe, M OpE.11.mbR6 45 *44.4 DI. 00514.*.... 1:505*., OO NV ft. 441.1.+ Upsllb01EV.20 )10.10, too.•.* W C..d 0I11741.4 NA" 119 01010 pOM( me. w., 4a,. 3t e,qy 7.0.00.104 A.er. Svm4ry 51S We 11.44.1* MELI1701.411014101.40.4 .'IOfweL4.MA2121•E4 1ro..n.r11..n.vL .4w4rto..../07..e.......14/0/000.0110.1.MOW: 00276 M .'•1. .tOL 34. IX0700 114.101 $00.1410^ Ow*. 0A4AT010.iii S,.. .•..- IYr.1.,.1 be 01914 Sswl .. f... f. awe* 4S Y4rtwf:lt.-. 1 I.9nb1\ OyA.T(TI 201x16[341 ' A/r.N.yi WM .1 40.1. M 76.16204 .11) a,.w 1c... Som WV 401W01Tan wa•YY.Wt.I 101111 ...-.,e ISi^•• �0� • 1 A _ 4d4,r rrll ri.„, .Mr .....1 0.4/11,1041017 1.Y ..,nn.. .,1.00,10•19,701.M LW, rb l,41•VNI ISOWI OS .®te7E1411.14 r.nr.,. ...a,....L1.4 ...84111114.3 Me .rew.wm ^�✓� •. • 1, 709M11.20MN10 CW 40014 ,Wono.rO.,.0 .33456 „r4rt,.na. 0,.ti^e.a.aa ��I15 Uqr+ 69100714 Rf P6 Mb PSS orb,. nsw1c7' • 1RM bmar. ma cr9 1,+144M4gA00+.0.r.,r', OOT .. OL1as* oxine (01140000 u 10 5? N " 9Nw9•Y0.f64rn6.1..POw S:fMA 6 6 97 6 UMTS 4 6 SI 94 111111.1r1141211041111'b344/4n*.111. 1.11 1 I I I�il+lx--- ICE I :17• `^ 112 I— — 111 6 6 r 34 11 Iasi AMPHENOL 24" PANEL ANTENNA TYPICAL EQUIPMENT ASSEMBLY ANTENNA MOUNTING FLANGE (HTXCNM19637II4I4Fx00) ION-WNW-1OP IX9CONNECT DOA STRNOMILEG MOLE 0aT BRACKET � MO I .411..041.Rr • .� _ '. �7,� 1.4.,:».1, N..Tams 1....T. CAKE FEEDER ••••••/...• %^- (NOT ENGINEERED r _I I TM IS PART IS FROM .A 0. 111/1 .1. .Ir 4.. /1 ITNNA EIANUFACNRE ....... I w1R( 1e.. 101 I 0•0100••••••0•0100••••••s.. -1.w 1 .. 1 .w. 1100.• .1011, 1.101111 .Y.awb..9r ,A -k. meow 14106111,11,411040, me 001.1•1•1111, wri. f7rl....1rr. _.ww 4 4• _. _' _. .. TP -20 142829 (j /JQCROI�N W� •,i NG WEST, INC. 2115 Vy,A.>1K1 SOs.G•11.1 Ar..r11Y 341.4..10 CCI -� •EUOOMIO fCA11073 C04101.70073 QOASTAL COUM0000110 . 111534 ..S.S. 1M Oem0LC.V01 (71011344210 f1101ttTMYTMO6YT071 T1IE 04U01ATIO.Y W3TA0100 N 116 A7OI 04.110950203 *07 ATN C*410.n1141TOKw10A AMYY160O OOgAYSUAS 071111144/1 ASO MATS 10 'Ow1071 R STRICTLY 11401 0011:0 m.70 ML AT AL IMP MO 10503* WO1>t T911A000,ALEAI 7 nn4 1.6....• P110.1111./........111.....1R.f. aar.lnu4e6N.V10r.I. 0041} MI 1 Ow/ TP -20 9711:1.1IKMIEO WREST LIGHT 1N010MN POSE EIE 5011/27_. Of 3E014041 *MT a CL01MM6N MCA 01.0491ISAL R011EMLCMW PASS cora 7E4ECYlA CA C NOTES AGR 09.18.1 TT pm3 OF 13 D 111.10/111011011.110 IIA L0001.0XI. COIL MLO t0 0°, 3Crpl1A11M0n HO,tIAA- WI 01,0101.1140 10110/01 .1111111[0110\ O11111.0111i11111013J i TP -20 142829 CROWN NG WEST, INC. 2111100 Ase STtc0 0/1110 04.000010.C noINRKK CCI--- THICOIA1NCAt10He LT011IATAm <MAALOx1M1Mul.Ms 3101111p00R..331 Q091M1 111011/110 1mmp44Nnx1It1H 21111 TI�t1 J 110.1 .I..1Y11w.r1•01.1101 .,1..YY,..»r11W..e, 41,01 0111.00010000. TP -20 ETI*LTQTIREOEPREIT LINK N ANTENNA PONE 001W1101/ RIO/W M NOWA IN. HANIATEHAC WM EL 01111110011.11.0001111110011.101111110011.11.00.01 PASS C11Y OF TWIEdµ1:4 NOTES AGR 09.18.12 .1.0430-\ TT ~4 OF 13 D GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS KATHRE N SCALA MOW. 10N1 010:1111°4 SCE APPROVED 10.0 .11 151 011000•101.0.1. n.11w., -11,0. NU110,1111101 011.01 11.111011100100I1TO4O.M1Y .>000~ COMO. 00,3.1 00000* 0 rd1M1 Y.. 000.01 20M.01111.010.01 I nT M 11 000101 011 11101001MAe1 11.4.1Rp 04 1001.111 n.,11A,NlA 411000+00 1.01 010111. 120 «1, 111111110,0011.1. 1,1•11.1 11 11110011 '"" Mru n ""07 METER PEDESTAL 1rrt1110CKt MO .,00001 • ....00..1.V. 112. 0.01.a0 �.00,0111w., Fwmwl.WaY00011gf.Y 110/10110 r..pm00..Ii..er14 e.I1111t i.i ... _ - .414:.0 r �,r 110 111 1101.111 111111111. 00.00.00.s.11 IENTN1rY I �?Y �-+' ■ 1orn 1Yx c4xvwA SWIM eanw.11111LWOle 1,11.0011141I 11.10- rxoPC ,Ifll(IONO( rutsaoRrma eAHOdHOtn uOlu.w.•::nK IHplO011M0 I ,12 01 Fra Al 111 Ire MI At HS NO 11e - 1.0 1.1.0 Y r W Y VW Y Y W - M1O0111NwNNTNN 1.11111-POAN14 1'MrE�PoH.lO 1'Mr11OY111 11/111p10140 10.01111�t1 ,,,,,,,0, er•pw.p1TN 11.Ouil`Idrp IVAO°•M1111 Fp1W0 010.1°010•. . FW 00 0044010.104.11.,01401/0.111 4..1111 N9i441:010 .01.0141011 ; Y W , V ,•w T Y, N I °Y M 0 11 w 0 11 11 w It 11 Y w000 K1P1 Y 0000000 NN0.r 00101.Wm x01W 10 0 . w ' MIIIIII 1 N•II � I II U 11� )I I .Ol1gOT1O4 • NEIN 1\\ LNn /, \\`Y/-CgICV'�I WOE VEDA, 0100/0 WO TARACE .7 FRONTVEW • 1101A,I111 -104.,114 New 0e „1w 1[AC!_/// Nr 111110.14 0110 WA 2w 16 I--"MT3 TYPICAL ANTENNA ASSEMBLY 1 11r000llRaw 01000100 HANNIFIN MIENNA 800-10270.TOZlO KATHREIN ANTENNA SERVICE AREA 600-70270IOO11pis FINK* BPLIIIER S-SCPUSE•L.N C,EECER 1 -� ,mill I Y iRif/ i6LN110 .^ 1� >r - - - f0 DASE ENCLOSED IN SONS,IETE 1141000 00001101010 us Now MOUNTING DIY --ri- IrmN1MYCW.MMp11 . 2Y.M,>IM00010 BASE 1. 001114.1.0100•6144.111 r s001,400 D. hi ttt wY w1.Yw� HMO 014.10610110.1.01103[10001011140“13143300111 SW01 V00 p 1:01111301001 .111141.111414.1. t .qosalaAuTlMl,00 Mt. we. DETAIL 70. PVEW I7rT ` [8.l;_, i TP -20 142829 CROWN NG WEST, INC. 2111100 Ase STtc0 0/1110 04.000010.C noINRKK CCI--- THICOIA1NCAt10He LT011IATAm <MAALOx1M1Mul.Ms 3101111p00R..331 Q091M1 111011/110 1mmp44Nnx1It1H 21111 TI�t1 J 110.1 .I..1Y11w.r1•01.1101 .,1..YY,..»r11W..e, 41,01 0111.00010000. TP -20 ETI*LTQTIREOEPREIT LINK N ANTENNA PONE 001W1101/ RIO/W M NOWA IN. HANIATEHAC WM EL 01111110011.11.0001111110011.101111110011.11.00.01 PASS C11Y OF TWIEdµ1:4 NOTES AGR 09.18.12 .1.0430-\ TT ~4 OF 13 D TP -20 142829 1 CROWN L NG WEST, INC. 3111114SA"YRR v0 G71M 1w�sY CCH-- TL11A:1PAPA'AIMT CONSULTANTS COASTALCOMMNCAPKOS 111IM.i.A.A41M —74-4 TRe1T0M FAOFMCTARY R 10401MIOY SIR INSOMMnPY CO01AINfDSN nIR 0-03 CM,. 9ROMRTAMYANL COA010f`TIAL TO VENDON ANY OHM OLM .OSORE OT1G TOM,AYR RELATES TOM AN IS SrRCTLY MOK91fr0 'bI I p 1101.111400 CALL M LEAST MO DAYIIMCAZ VOODOO UNDE•OROMO RAMC Mt. •1TOLT0. .eu eV Ear TP -20 0Ra TO%Txk03TKEi UGIITIANIEANA POLE M COMMOI 96140811 PIMP• it 0010111ma CL CIM0L4 R11ENL01AI1 PAW for CO TRICCIAAG ( NOTES ) T,n ."w.mv\ AGR 09.18.12 TT OF 13 \ D 24" x 36" FIBER SPLICE BOX TYPICAL GROUND DETAIL GROUND ROD DETAIL POLYMER CONCRETE ASSEMBLY • STRAIGHT SIDES. NO FLOOR. WUC 3.8.-20K, 3I6• HEX BOLTS, CROWN CASTLE LOGO-EMROemO (SPECIFY AT AMIE OF ORDER) INSTALLED. LOAD RATINGS: WITH STUB -UP 12 x 14 CONCRETE UTILITY BOX W/ COVER S 3 W II TEXTURED Oiril POLE 00.10. TOT mu LP ES0,110E (71441 1Wm1blE 9 / 1," ' TRPFFICPARKINO LOT, SIDEWALK INCIDENTAL TO, CONFORMS • ASTM C 4157 ANSYSCTE77 1' .. FEATURES. /1 Sa D : �El�7fYla—.. 1 r�■ asa • P2 AW0 CADV/EID TYPE '(iY MOLD T-0,e'COPPERDUD� GROUND ROO 1, I 1 - USOARUS APPROVED DROP-IN SKID RESISTANT COVER � SKID ED ASSEMRESISTANT OVER STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS CAST -IN FLOATING NUT BOX INTEGRAL DRAIN FHCLES FIBER SPLICE BOX SHALL BE UBELE0 CROWN CASTLE COMM. EQUIPMENT WITH RACK WITH UNISTRUr FOR FEIER SPLICE MOUNTING �J/ %..61,,, \ //�� L.,,� ��� = � - YIgPE PHOPE rang GROUND34ERCIAD OROWgR00 P SOT I010 ELECTRICAL MIIERPECESTAL I91-148-- 10 11 11. NOTICE SIGNAGE PANEL SCHEDULE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM ECNLNSE SCALE N t 3 PROPOSED MEIER PEDESTAL 1004 120040V, 10,3W 42.000 MC (MYERS POWER PRODUCT) © LOON ICOR 7R V �/7R iV'GTn GID PANEL •AN -.30- BE 1 dD Y .TS-LANSE3„IKRE MAIN714x. A , NOTICE 1 : s 1 1 1 .112..— s N.+- VOLT AYB ENKArMIS-mere •— Lo ILVaA AWE II 4q �,u 110 }. MO MSI 1'# • Em NOK---- I KS 'ORWND Redo frequency fields beyond this point may exceed the FCC general public exposure lime OMYM DKM Ore arN MM OAOILIee NI1.080., n0191pn r-ob fI-01^I'LYRfAwn0lxA ��'�^'..^� \�ren....l Yom— I..,— 1 P•-^ 18 ��— _ I t PLCO MO NO YAFK YC UNDERGROUND TRE NCHO TO SCE VAULT RUM Dee �-Alo COMMA WNW LOAM PANEL •A' 20A 1400 R x -� 1,7001,700W � m/K T EAR . m0_ miK *NIT NT. _ma_ YYGIAG• 20A 1. MOT POINTS OF SERVICE AM) WORK/ IMTERIALS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON PRELIMINARY ARY INFORMATIN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES AND ARE FORBID PURPOSESOMY. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH 0.RY COMPANY FOR FINAL AND EXACT WORK I MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS AND CONSTRUCT TO UTILITY COMFREY ENGINEERING PLANS ANO SPECFICAT ONS ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL CCNOUIT. PULL ROPES, CABLES, PULL BOXES..1 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT O' CONDUIT (10 REWIRED), TRANSFORMER PAD. BARRIERS, POLE RISERS. TRENCHING. BACKFLI, PAYALL UTILITY COMPANY FEES AND INCLUDE AL 81(01004111(4141341 SCOPE OF WORN( O 20A _ KEYNOTES: POLE GROUND ROO- O3 YC -3110/11.3U1 O3 0 1.080., V130.7% SOUARE D LOAD CENTER 400747011e W/1TANDCM BREAKERS e00T2020 OR EQUAL NYC-2E1211a12G VSC.IP2GO Y4'C•IMI GLAD TO POEO!(WMROD 400AtU 4 O - 40N11U O ANORBW 4 O KIN NOC TEL 0:000-788.7811 TP -20 12 " 1 113 Figur_j 141 iF TP -20 142829 1 CROWN L NG WEST, INC. 3111114SA"YRR v0 G71M 1w�sY CCH-- TL11A:1PAPA'AIMT CONSULTANTS COASTALCOMMNCAPKOS 111IM.i.A.A41M —74-4 TRe1T0M FAOFMCTARY R 10401MIOY SIR INSOMMnPY CO01AINfDSN nIR 0-03 CM,. 9ROMRTAMYANL COA010f`TIAL TO VENDON ANY OHM OLM .OSORE OT1G TOM,AYR RELATES TOM AN IS SrRCTLY MOK91fr0 'bI I p 1101.111400 CALL M LEAST MO DAYIIMCAZ VOODOO UNDE•OROMO RAMC Mt. •1TOLT0. .eu eV Ear TP -20 0Ra TO%Txk03TKEi UGIITIANIEANA POLE M COMMOI 96140811 PIMP• it 0010111ma CL CIM0L4 R11ENL01AI1 PAW for CO TRICCIAAG ( NOTES ) T,n ."w.mv\ AGR 09.18.12 TT OF 13 \ D TP -20 1FSEl1M 1s 829 V6 CROWN NG WEST, INC. ngtrIVIT me.•vW mu t 11_S.444/4 CCI TE1DODN041MIwl1P4 C'Q•RLTANTS MYINNIRSEAN 112 *WS S0..4 TIIWRNI11 I1001EfMYp70114014:04 nit P6MM Anon COS'TAISPD N 114 SUCK NAATCIS IS 1410•14EIMT ASD CQ'GCE3010 TO 011235f1 ANT 1O401 g0CLtl11x00111[11THAN A9 N IB.L1E4 10 MOON 4 STIOCTLY NIp11NT10 WNnwe CALL At t4AM IAO OA. RIM W I94X1o401.4401l1NLT A1t1 t 1181(• lA CO •.Nv 111L, [Of 9ssoosunsuss saw. 1.0.11 iE1RY.OEExLEEtsS i TP -211 11TEELIEXTI9WO SUMS! LIOIT'ANTENNA PGL! SAL CORNER Of REOIMWK ROW 4 EL COMM. MOIL ELCI M300 700411.01 PASS *NOP TIAWCWLCA PROFILES AGR 9.18.12v TT 6 OF 13 D MAKE READY WSTALL IGTMENOCALAIRI SFCTOR ANTENNA 4001000 (SEE OETAIL BON BRET SEE DETAA 67M ES.' I 1 ,A • • . 1. •nY_E 1 xn 0 I Ykis', y � Vii,• % 4//0:4 ���TT.,.., A la i//fa(" /lad t INSTALi9N0001EBW o.pp' IIIROITA 11 MUM Oras �\f(�41 \ `Cs. \ ll ?ll"l'/l 3: 1 I iTOP I E 1 t`E ECS SI . j}j ►,J I, � 4 TOP OP SE/(M AATIT1• CCASTLE TO MATERS+RRdINO / MASCROWNCROWNRA MN TAPS)UNIMNE To NSW STEEL TE)TM06111EST USW /ANIONS POSE UIPOLE AT Y? ^3)2247MAP1C•OLPAIEL !1/M911194d•I.2 iT>tl (SEE °ETAS. ON SMELT 31 - CROWNCASRP tORStUL ROAST 07S7C77.'MCRAE° AN7on, MO. PIMA90S1.3PTP EU .I•CR (SEE DETALS 1.3.6 t NRIIEFT3I (SEE arAA3us uoNWR6r s) I INSTALL TID6CONIECT ROX (SEE DETAIL SON MEET 0 I ry ll .l inTAU TIESR9ROXIOX ...t.*./.0 . i 66ko9TAl9(NISKETs) L, ' %l�/{vfgT14i0B0WOl0TWE1L D./Y LMED9TAL,IGMEIQTII M"C4 "C.'; r•/*,4, ! $rS.E,I T wWTFp41accli_M,Antra.A_( ,LF NEW CONSTRUCTION CROWN CASTLE 10 INSTALL NEW 3T TEXTURED STEEL POLE CROWN CASTLE TO MATCH SURROUNDING WAST ARMAND LUVINARE TO NEWS TEXTURED STEEL POLE. INSTALL CIRCUIT ERENcER Ar T T. INSTALL (2)10N ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 90CLOCK ARO 3 O'CLOCK PO0IT10N AT 12 T. INSTALL (2)10N ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 90CLOCK AND 30GL0CN POSITION AT Id T. INSTALL(3)2PAMPHENOL PANEL ANTENNAS 06971896371092170 AT IT/ 120,W I10WINS MN A RPD CENTER CC 27. 2.. INSTALL (/) RATIREIN TM SECTOR ANTENU0E00.10270 ON TOP OF POLE INSTALL (I) 217 x367 FIBER SPLICE BOX INSTALL (7) GROUND TEST WELLS. INSTALL (21GROU O RODS INSTALL(1)METERPEDESTAL NOTES: TOTAL STRUCTURE ROOM 3d r ANTENNA WPC: (/) RATNR0N TTI s11210Lr67 (3)AMP1ENOL PANEL 23 TX 1207 X 7.17 AOW11070'/ 10l301T 0' 240'... j v CC Q J o �r Qe Oz• T 0eii 4,� u, B I ANTENNA DETAILS I [ _ _ — A 1 12 OICLOCK VIEW kLLa-1Ar•Nr TP -20 1FSEl1M 1s 829 V6 CROWN NG WEST, INC. ngtrIVIT me.•vW mu t 11_S.444/4 CCI TE1DODN041MIwl1P4 C'Q•RLTANTS MYINNIRSEAN 112 *WS S0..4 TIIWRNI11 I1001EfMYp70114014:04 nit P6MM Anon COS'TAISPD N 114 SUCK NAATCIS IS 1410•14EIMT ASD CQ'GCE3010 TO 011235f1 ANT 1O401 g0CLtl11x00111[11THAN A9 N IB.L1E4 10 MOON 4 STIOCTLY NIp11NT10 WNnwe CALL At t4AM IAO OA. RIM W I94X1o401.4401l1NLT A1t1 t 1181(• lA CO •.Nv 111L, [Of 9ssoosunsuss saw. 1.0.11 iE1RY.OEExLEEtsS i TP -211 11TEELIEXTI9WO SUMS! LIOIT'ANTENNA PGL! SAL CORNER Of REOIMWK ROW 4 EL COMM. MOIL ELCI M300 700411.01 PASS *NOP TIAWCWLCA PROFILES AGR 9.18.12v TT 6 OF 13 D NON—FCCAVITIAL SEFPACE PEU TAL U --2 x AMPS U-600 Vous SEE E5R 3-15 142829 FINAL DESIGN APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION VICINITY MAI' k J. ei1.= NOW Ow tomb we ▪ ,. sil, s i1 donor r >r11. ,r kr ANA, 0' .w r . a..Atr .r krr 4...rr Ada It w. 1,;.tpm• new AP amps R .)r At mil S k h_Eor r alar 12*-4'krnri.1TritwElrEli*apt, .Ikr•.N.Te711 Peel IELOGDMMITATCA,'O�c WNH0.InMT MONS *Mt AtO l'AtE aaOE 1NGL i2 OK IS mum. RIM la IEB .t•1 OMS. St Rat 011 COMM. COM,MTICAT,OSS f Kelm Me. LH OMA.Iao - MOrNCTARY 1MFMWA11ON HIE P ORMAT)OC(CONTIMEn N alb TCT Or b4.YNOY R IT101aETAAY A\a CO5 TWC NTlnL TO WAILON. ANY COIOA DISCIASHWOHIER TM.LEI ASRERATa Tovc.n, {CETMCTEYR1WEeaf.. ari imari•WZ7 7IQIit 1x71Oo 1le7 2 Or t1 _PROEM REUt8fialiaCI5 aI JI memo mimeo BD E f.H Cil p J 01 PEAR WPM MHO TIPS: DCt10A0010tT OUTAGE 1[A11d .01044i0 MU MAW N3>< TOPEFC w1FMOL Felin DMIGbWtX arum Into Omar. Aa1NTF AOI W R ALa11 Tpt1• WARNING 1E lattAWA It4t OE. lft. SES MECESU iT E UM mfOLT U)i 1F ROAM WWI kfd 111•T ■ =RUPP KHOO O! YMYtf PO r %N lE fEl 1E MS= 111l®1f IT ISM AFI RAM PFptN. IR EWAN 1 E O®IIZ, 11r FLIT Cf>01111I® OF LOUT IOOIOVAP Ui COPi L WAR 10 MATO Rana 6 TK Oelt,wrr a x 11130111111. Southern 01IFEOnb EdbOn Camany 2 462730_0.01 TP -20 mtaitiatmedraost UONrIAMBNAPME K COMER OF RFOMAWM MAW O la CHAIM MCA. OS MAMAS MO TERACMAA PASO MMralrwatwa ( POWER DESIGN 7 OF 13 TP -20 .TN..N, 142829 NG WEST, INC. 11.0 Mt ST60 I.CA 01/10 w Baa aNe M 1MRCO1E0RXCAD0.7 CGNMIAME COACT& 0001W6CAT61P3 S30I11T.AN84131 IMOTC85N MW IETAfYPTONIATON TIE 0•TOIIIMTNAV MNTA w IN 111,1 MOT DRAM/. P11W1LICTARIAND CONIRMIMAL 10 MEM AMMO. DISCLOSURE 011ERTIAN AIR N ATTA OV1R LON ITTRIGRV PRaI-IITD CALLAT LUST ,N - DE DAYS TOO DIG `6tfl 1WfWtnMC6..u5 1 At TA ...aNµ(MMIu1w""O`Pr U.R.P.LSCe1N.11.1.e• J STEEL 110CTRiE0ET6Ef UQHT WRE NA POLE IC COIDEROF RE01UW% RMTR R CRMENL MCA ft CIIRRBAL R01119IACMAR PASO C1IV OG TEMECOU CA POWER DESIGN AGR 09.18.12 1T �8 OF 13 D FINAL DESIGN /tj___(APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION / DC 55457300 50E ~-,__ - SR1rCSCi MAW n _ lit 1- am it ES II On 7111 W 4-11,7 It 1- OHM NSIIMT1F3NP*4141 ,.. %-e'1141.---- / it I- am MINS ua.tt11-3911114111 '� S'4C It i$- .2-1* IL ``. IL 1- tit 2411-2 A..1 -lit *DON 1 Ku ~`~ y \ .pae71[ r a�. a it w`---�. ]1 aim 21/f A 1,• ~- ��'\� l^ „9 ,FP4141/01- _ co *t 1- KR 10193A* tlAf 4 P. Ks a G70 a — ~�. \���3 : - CAMmalt lm rt.t eel M 3 `_ c� rQc�lena. cax�c _ .. �'-.�cf{hYS+ cl �� Amass at fEJs= MAW 1:t� �. am > of --mnp a Inas' fN �,� -• _ // `� 1Rt IW c - 1 '.. Vo o vat T-lE- SA- v 'MO � Ior -N I ileP 1 �' .1 liK1 W FA RHI `4k `` `.�.. �` - r/L tw7E1 tb 6'»I '1110 3-T f0-I�iV Of a ro .. ', a•Wi,�y . wr z -e Nr )-1000-1tMl --*---.„....„..._........„....343f t-deo-1S,PIT 06 �. / �ii`•Ws Du � 1`� DETTAl1. EDISON �' £ �" s ,1M.��• C' Iev48 ea - WOW 4644. 31(464 �t I A60T7 COOS Hart sa►.g-344 E 14141 SOI -S30-4330 , fiibfir1 mat Ni. Fir 1ii3-ML W57 I1t'aP')r.4 ne.Nl»aM1 1_ —I� Mir: 101 * * CO r 411 -Plat mato w .IP.. m iH Ro14MT1[e 0601 Ra. cm metro W� =OM 1' - Otr 1 X sas+o�00RftRtets�U 1 1 a114Wi CA3TIE N S11E# 1 P-21 IF.+T, t1C. 0 A ISO / 3 . 1.11113 $2/401: VIM a _ .o Sf C/O t#AHAVIK rltwr &I El. CIIMS+IL MECUM CA 9" CIRCUM PASCAL 17VUL P i ya R/e X 6 to l WA ries� FiSs. rc�t.r IiiiallCarpmyIli r.Paaw7► 462730_0.01 earfotSI.taLEds.o s TP -20 .TN..N, 142829 NG WEST, INC. 11.0 Mt ST60 I.CA 01/10 w Baa aNe M 1MRCO1E0RXCAD0.7 CGNMIAME COACT& 0001W6CAT61P3 S30I11T.AN84131 IMOTC85N MW IETAfYPTONIATON TIE 0•TOIIIMTNAV MNTA w IN 111,1 MOT DRAM/. P11W1LICTARIAND CONIRMIMAL 10 MEM AMMO. DISCLOSURE 011ERTIAN AIR N ATTA OV1R LON ITTRIGRV PRaI-IITD CALLAT LUST ,N - DE DAYS TOO DIG `6tfl 1WfWtnMC6..u5 1 At TA ...aNµ(MMIu1w""O`Pr U.R.P.LSCe1N.11.1.e• J STEEL 110CTRiE0ET6Ef UQHT WRE NA POLE IC COIDEROF RE01UW% RMTR R CRMENL MCA ft CIIRRBAL R01119IACMAR PASO C1IV OG TEMECOU CA POWER DESIGN AGR 09.18.12 1T �8 OF 13 D -in 1 O'CLOCK VIEW C 1 12 O'CLOCK VIEW D 1 11 O'CLOCK VIEW TP -20 1�A,ew 142829 11••I••+}4 CCI TaECOWOAxfnmx GONSOLtA%TS COASTAACO.MMINCATIOPI I1.11MbwOe4S2.11 O.maYSC1e1051 014) MAN. PPpPI[TAIIY WORM 11. 1111neoWIIKOtU4TAISW of r1 f.Tp MAMnMAIPOMU MV EK.7MR,OA.10M110* WY NIM tO 0LOSVIO 01111'IOCTLTTPM 114:0311OII O CIDM 110, .0.19 ns.intituv ors som ..01111eM1.ore asl 1.1901 P.� mame TP -20 E7E¢7E%TOFOETREET UGIIT IA RI POLE 5.E CORMERt" REOHAN% PIMP( A.1. CMNOBAIU CIL EL CIILOSAL IW IE.ACIMIN PA9E CIry Of TEMEgEA.CA SITE PHOTOS ..IT..R AOR 09.18.12 11' 90F 13 D INSTALL STEE1 TEXTURED STREET LIGHT !ANTENNA POLC INSTALL 00011443 LEST WEIL INSTALL NIT[R PEDESTAL 44 11 / `✓ r�% j� � SC SWOP 1a1.• NSTILLSONOIPR) TEST N'EU OCIEDULC AO CONDO N IND/ALE TITER SPI ICE 000 DETAIL 'A' FOOTAGE TOTALS DIRT TRENCH 20 BORE 40' TOTAL 65' RIR TOTAL SWF 1 72 80. FT. 22' ,A 1'`JIr �r�r1I APN #982321015 INSTALL GROUND TEST YELL SITE LOCATION INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL N8TALL SPLICE BO% RAR 8' X 6' SNP 5' 0101 TRENCH BORE PIT STA 99.24 40' DCBE RAR B' X O' SN'P 0' DIRT TRENCH BORE PIT STA 99 • 84 "9 APN 0980241001 rQ Q- \. L 100' id 02' 1 If .! '/101 r'Jsl 11 NODE COOR0481E 1AT10JE 3301073 10001103E .1170411n CROWN CASTLETO MACE NAATXIOLE 11 PROPOSED SCE IIANDIIOU CALL OUT DOES NOT 0050. L'Xtaaw:rI EC TU aLA 1. vr4 INV I NE/ rEHA61IAPl PASS STA. 100. OO EL 0(11(9SAL RD STA 100. 00 REOHA''A( PIIWY STA 100 100 APN #966180015 Lai d � APN #982052018 INSTALL METERED PEDESTAL (7' B.O.C.) SEE DETAIL STA. 98.64 12. INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (7' B.O.C.) STA. 90 27 3' DIRT TRENCH SITE LOCATION PLACE STEEL TEXTURED ANTENNA POLE (7' B.O.C.) STA. 99 •24 3' DIRT TRENCH INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (7' B.O.C.) STA. 99.21 3' OIRT TRENCH INSTALL SPLICE BOX (7' B.D.C.) STA 09.16 EXISTING 6'X9' VAULT (r B.0 C.) STA 99.10 6' DIRT TRENCH EXISTING SCE H080140 E STA. 98.78 - 40 00(101,1 NORTH SCALE: 1" = 20' TP -20 IINtCU1A • rNr••�nr 142829 6 / (� CROWI,V W NG WLST, INC. 1131 WAY MASTER 110 k Trn!••RM. CCI 1ICONWNItADLLS 4RESLTLAI9 COASTALCON300 AT(RS MM.. ANNA )H 11R11SHOMM NI0I0NTAAV INPo0.YA1 W II 1M[RRORMAEIW L0.NTAINEOd TAN SST OT I0ANIN0B 8TR0IRIETARY AIL EOMIA ANT MON LOSUAEOTM M NAI rf MAUS 10 WALTON N SMOLT ERO1.I9ETE0 1)I 14p>nIRM Gall AT LIAM TOO OATS MOIL V0Do03 t0i1 M3110UDI0WtT, ALCM `T1d[T I rA CPIOmf1• UPON ARnmuN1 MOO ROMA IOPII t TP -20 STEEL 1EXITE EO 5TIIE1T NEON I ANTENNA POLL 8E CORNER OR 310081411 PIETY SELWMOML MCA LLORIIdL NIP WOMAN RARE *NW TE0TcoNACA SITE PLAN P MM."' AGR 09.18.12 Nnwvn\ TY 10 OF 13 D VCROWN NG WEST, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN W RITINO OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. .11(.11.0,.4 1111 1111 13I C T,.11 TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE S/S OF REGINA DR 195' C/L OF VALENTINO WAY CITY OF TEMECULA, CA VAISIRIRO PROPOSED NODE LOCATION n N.T.S. VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL NEW 32 TEXTURED STEEL POLE. CROWN CASTLE TO MATCH SURROUNDING MAST MRM AND LUMINARE TO NEWS TEXTURED STEEL POLE INSTALL CIRCUIT BREAKER AT 7' 0°. INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9 O'CLOCK AND 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 12' T. INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9 O'CLOCK AND 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 19' T. INSTALL (3)24' AMPHENOL PANEL ANTENNAS 869809611710.2170 AT 0° I 120°1 240* AZIMUTHS WITH A RAO CENTER OF 21 r. INSTALL (1) KATHREIN TRI SECTOR ANTENNA0800-10270 ON TOP OF POLE INSTALL (1) 24' x 38° FIBER SPLICE BOX. INSTALL (2) GROUND TEST WELLS. INSTALL (2) GROUND RODS. INSTALL (1) METER PEDESTAL. PROJECT SUMMARY IEET NUMBER: DESCRIPTION TIT EATaET NOTESAOETAIS NOTES A DETAILS NOTES A DETAILS NOTESA DETAILS POLE MOMS POLE MOVIE SDE PHOTOS SITE PLAN SHEET INDEX PROJECT MANAGER: CROWN CASTLE 1100 DEXTER AVENUE STE 250 SEATTLE, WA 98109 STEVE WEJNOARDT (805) 235.1431 STEVEN.WEINGARDT*CROWNCASTLE.COM JIODE ENGINEER: COASTAL COMMUNICATIONS 3355 MISSION AVE, STE 234 OCEANSIDE, CA.92058 TODD THREW (760) 754-9240 EXT.101 TODD@COASTALCOMMINCICOM CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CROWN CASTLE 1100 DEXTER AVENUE STE 250 SEATTLE, WA 98109 STEVE PATINO (805) 234-1431 STSPIIEN.PATIN000NTEACTOR®CROW NCASTLE.COM JAN 1 4 2013 MDF• 511 hf Shill 3 I' •}0 even s�1 �I:'''''i0 1' 1*) o� ?elIAA. PROJECT'TEAM i TP -21 11./1 142829 VACROWN W is ;You NG WEST, INC JIDWA*IAwSIDla Ve...1100 Ct CCI TELLONMUNCATIR.T CO,IVLTANR CGNSTAI.CO INVNICAIIO.l HENS. Awa IN 0..40112011 110/17319.3 NEPNLIAATLMOIIMARCo TIELNWNA11R1O0 flMWW 11TI113 3111 OTCMWP le r10111111111 COM001111110.11101R A..VUSCOR 1/13.0.116011.11111.111111.1. TO 1111.11011 11510.1.11.1101.1110 'OI IMLEELOIA 3DaVKL AINIT \11.1111 1111,11. woo A.` T"J TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT (ANTENNA POLE SIS OF REGINA OR 19E CA. OF VALENTINO WAY CRY OF TEMECULA, CA ( TITLE SHEET ) AGR (12.18.12 1 OF 9 TT B LEGEND .SY BOL »ESCRIPTION 1111 10 1WWepF r O NA 0' , sows RWI MOW0,22/1/12 01MCROOI• OKI 400 7471“ cDVNIAI ILAmN ABBREVIATIONS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 1GIr011ARYD10NOMSEOMLNT0D`.TROL PRIOR TO COMPLETION Of,MAI DOROVEMEMS.S1MILBC RREORMFD BY THE C4MIUCIOR 0R OVALI160 FUSON AS INOICADO BELOW I. ALL RCWgEMINIS OF 711t CO' OF TEMECULA'LAND DEVLLOFMDII VA45T00M WATER STANDARDS' MUsr 00 rtORFIMA,D 0nO TNR 0IoI01 ANO CONSTRUCTION OF THE rtO•OSEO MUG MPAOVEMENTSCONNSTEM WIN THE EROSKOKO OL MAN ANDORWAI[R FOLLNWNCOV1110C /IAN MK -FLOE AFPLICABLA 2 POR STORM DRAIN INLETS, ROVtC A GRAVEL BAG SILT BASIN B MILO2ATELY UPSTREAM OF 1MAT AS PTCATE0 OV DETAILS. ETRE COMPACTOR 0R QUAL ONO PERSON SIULLBERLSSFQSIDLE FOR CLEANUP OF SILT ANOMIIOMI AINALTNI !THERM AND STOW DRAW SYSIEM DVC 70 OONS11l0C1104 ACTIVITY I. IIMCOMRACTOI SHALL REMOVE SILT AND OEM SAETFA EACH MARNI RAINFALL 1. L131II1,2214 AND WORMS FOR EMLROfAY:Y WORK MALL BE MADE AVADABLE AT ALL TIMM MOND TIM RANT SEASON 6 Mt CONIMLTOR SMALL RESTORE ALL LROLONSEOBILMT CONRO.DEvKO5 TO WORMY) PROM TO THESA1ISFACTON Or INE CITY F7242L0R ORR OM, DOWER ATM CALM RUMO1T2R000CMO RAINFALL 2, TNL WN1RACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL ROOIVSLOI.MU TCONTROL MEMUFFS AS MAY RE R[QVMED DY 1140 RILDFNrE001NEER ouETo UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES, WWII MAY ARISE I. ALL f00S10NIFDISRNT ('.212F71101. MEA3IIRFS ROMPEDRR 111E AIIROLOII ORROVFMCM PIAN SHAl1 BENCORrOTATEO NERD . AtLFROs1OM51D02ENL CONTROL IOP INTERIMCO OIIONS/RALL DC DONT. FOFIRMIIHAC110x0/ INB1fRI0MTIMAM* 9. ALL REMOVABIE ROIECOMOEVIC(SSIgWN MALL DEM KALI A71111CMO02 CSCII WORRNO OAY WMENMINISMMWYM. O TIE CONTRACTOR SHALLARRAW)E. FOR WEEKLY ME621NOS DIMING OC100IA 11110 AMR 20111101 P10IECT TRAM (GENERAL COIORACrOA WAUFIFO REASON. EROSION CONTROL SU000VIRACT(M rANY. PNGNYER OF WOIK.OWNIOUDEVELOPLR AND 1116ELSIDLNT ENOPRIAEIO RVALUAM INC AWOL..'OE TM[F.ROM0NS1Ov)N1 Cr:NraOL MEASURES AND ODDER RELATED CONSTRUCTON ACTMIIES STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION /Y --1--T, INLET EDGE OF PAVEMENT [lye+ j FLOW SPILLWAY, 1 -BAG HIGII SANDBAG 2.BAGS HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH OPPOSING FLOW DIRECTIONS EDGE OF PAVEMENT INLET —.FLAW SPILLWAY, 1 -BAG IIIOII SANDBAG 2 -BAGS )HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH SINGLE FLOW DIRECTION NOTES: I MENDED FOR SPORT -TERM USG 2 USE TODMIMT NON• S10RM WATER FLOW. ). ALLOW FOR ROPER MAINTENANCE AND CLEANUP. 2 13A05 RUST BE REMOVED AFTER AD/ACENT OPERATION IS COMPLETED. S NOT APPLICABLE IN AREAS W1211 MON SILTS AND C1,020VTT100152 FILTER FABRIC NOTES: 1. COMMCTOR TOPOMOIE ALL MOT ORQL4110S 2 CONTRACTOR TO PUCE w00003AROLROAMY., STORY GRAIN RATS TO PREVENT CORANINATEOWA1C61 3 SROl1 KZ VAl111 COMMM0Nq CONTAM0AND STALE, BIL BE SWEPT ADO EANEOAS 1420E0 4.COIORAC10R 10 REPAR DRVAOEDRAM VFNC,EUENT. TO 004 SAUSFM110M OF 11.E 000 [1OMA S CVRB • GUTTER TORE PR01IC110 R FSACI BOCWAUI 1005 MOIACEO TO Tut S4I00AC1O22 0/ 01C011YDMBIEtl0 • TPR CONTRACTOR SMALL RESTORE TIE M.N. RAO( TO 1010140601 CONDITION IA1100010RY TOM CITI 11.210041.4 EICMC•12.0If1 NOT LRBI1010 WINO,B10PR0,BILI LANES.PAMWE LE0INDS.SgN1.020'RAMC LOOP 041001OR5 1. SOEWNS PULL BE RESIOREOREPIAC20PFA OM OFTEUFCUU SIANOADOOR YM450.0P. GDR 0114 SOC100 B PE0E511.0 RAMPV0L NO, OE OSIURMD ROW GROUND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: GROUNDC01C5IRUC1I021 T000MOVECUANM L DERIS. NAIIS,5100Ui(M NON USED VLRIK'ASSOD flILIOLE O MECO/410.0020N SMALL BIM ACCOROANYT. W(211 MUNICIPAL. COMTY.STATG F 20222AL.0003 ANO 0012.51ANDAROS An0RLOOLANO S 2. CALL USA 4IRRMSp010R 10 EXCAVATING A1 000)227.7640 ORM. 4. ALL LANDSCAPING TO OE RESTORF.0 700R10D2AL02140100:1 OR BEITG 1 ALL 1Q01014041 TO RE 00NDTD • METERINGCABURt RE1)11MFS14'ROARA100 ATDO0R ORNND I CAULK CABINET BASE AT PAD NORMAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: 1 LOCATION AND DERV OFEOSTMO ALWPA0103LDUIIURES MUST OEFROYOEDBY 106 5100044060 AND SHOWN ON ANY FLANS SUBM1I00 TOINE OM. Or MIK WORKS FOR APPROVAL E ORANGES MAY DE PERMITTED BY 111E DEPT. Or PUBLIC 'AVMS M CASES OF COMLICTO IAIIIIOA 1 CONTLKIS BETWEEN UTILITY COMPAMES FACRINTS.EIOTDD AND RORLVD.NAr BE MUTUALLY RESOLVED ElY THEUI E TY COMPANIES l TOR COM. IAL 6TO,0, LKS.1NE r4E IIYORAM MALL BC HALED WYMIN TIE IOf•WAULPCY.1IADPACE OrCURIE 1 MAXIMUM r DIAVBG Iw5MYI0TUY0R ILACIOIxA1Mf V101Irt3T11A0M ;MITT TO AFROVALOf OTT ENGINEER IM TRACTS) CALIFORNIA STATE CODE COMPLIANCE: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF TIME FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES: CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (INCLUDING TITLES 24&25)2010 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES WHICH ADOPTS TIME 2010 UBC, 2010 UMC, 2110 UPC AND THE 2010 NEC. BUILDING OFFICIALS & CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA) 2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ANSUEIA-222-F LIFE SAFETY CODE NEPA-101 2010 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 2010 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE 2011 LOCAL BUILDING CODE CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY 13 UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HAITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2110 CAUFORNIA BUILDING CODE. FCC NOTE: THIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY COMPLIES WITII FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR RADIO FREQUENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT OF 1996 AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS AND ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY STATE OR FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES. TP -21 \ 11M0(1)10 142829 Ij !I CROWN W NG WEST, INC. 21231401 Me SIG CP 61ne.CA 01 DI PF CCI 1AVMDN11CAnONS COASTALCUMOAKA1WN M3S-A.e5R21.1 01.4o1ACe90AI m0,519241 IfNPA1ETMV 1NEORSMTION I IM DTOM1-111C16OO11AD10DNI11 V1101110.1! ANO C0,710001.L OV6RILON ANY UR.OA DISCLOSURE 011KA11MY AS If 01'1111(5 tOMILOV 11 OMOLV rRU1®110 000G10110O1MAMK[ALERI TIMID TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIG/IT r ANTENNA POLE SIS OF REGINA DR 19T CA OF VALENTINO WAY CITY OF TEMECULA, CA ( NOTES ) '7,:617 AOR 112.18.12 TT c 2 OF 9 B l TP -21 142829 ! CROWN NG WEST, INC. NIWA4MA • 4W91)Vs0,U91100 Y awWa&u. 14.10 042 - CCI 13LtA0.MMW.1CAf0AS CONSULTAMS COASTAL CW W.. IUllgl /IOW, . Ann. IM Om44..O.4004 001T49M0 3AOrIUCIARVWO*MAT109 TIIL I?TgWA110V g011AP4a10114n 5000 OM W 100115 M0rNFIM Y AND fl0000.SrnAL S1 0 VEN00 AMYOSlO18 S xLOSVW.oerr IVLYAA% RE,310 l ! l 3204 SW NOW w! TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT I ANTENNAPCLE 8I9 OF REGNA DR 198 CIL OF VALENTNO WAY CIN OFTEMECU(A CA NOTES / AGR 12.18.12 TT 3 OF 9 B DISCONNECT BOX 5,,,,,.m..,,, ..t1awl 4A. ANDREW !ON-M7P / 7P / EU S4.1 -0n WM1081142a1 IWC 1aw e4.9 TOMTIT ,uow.u,1 (70A, Main Type: U900,Fixe•factory Installed rnaln lugs, 1 -Phase (Q024L7ORB) :04 .war MAW" wP.� w..o�s.elx 84x104..ar1.0v le4+..awe .,,,r CA„ 51b]w 1.1.1.7.”...5«230 SLAM, Yanc. See, to,.e.4 Y.,* 0w,nl 0000 'aL 041.5 16"4 sacra 10 a ew1A v...e....n.Acx. e0 .1 ES: -APC P. Ogc.M.O'uu. a0 a P.V.P.W�x. OW 10'.0,4 40 x0 N• 14. T.+.:-^, 9ny. mon SW123 M4-40.,.94.. w[We. aP...�...� b,d 1%^•]�1W ]'"'. Cannon, 001nM .,.. da.` a Or. cr.u >44 M. rO wgtaM �0 o.......l la,. 104,13,9 Lk 400:00. T.M.00 .-Pre vcmM.w. a1 Too ,. is 4o4n•41., rri�s•w�., n. 1 w+. CV 700 ,. M.n.W WOr34w.C4. 6.0ea -.n new [r aurin >t .n....�..+1 ....vun 4,0,1010 1481381,44W.dIOemnfn) .304150.04, :wt.". P] i463.5dj Ion i•••• s.•e.+...<c c.co W.a4. Mme) 70 µ10 0456, km. 0.1 I1 [� j 41 MULTI -BAND, MULTI OPERATOR REMOTE OPTICAL SYSTEM _ '•1 [1 wpm •a,.ae •ruY o0.4w.,ary Sp-.`.Yx�1.W.4rw. .. �0.1MN. awnu,l10 0n0.r40.O.r,w4ouww0l '�^--•� ��� 034 0 1,aacYwl4wx.x 0W0.10..4.WY1084 rtt. r -A . Y10vI0..w•mv ,` - /1 004.18 .•OYaanow.'C 3]bxA r•40•..i• w.. 1021 Ir -.M Pab.a, ...... a.1• i1E SA 11W. 404 718 rn47i Fn PM 4P..As 00.4. ?Mon? • Mn Y.bWW41.0.43.4*on? 148111•40044 raw O.O.W-.A. .. 0000 taaleV OSI.SFOAE 42 40 3i 34 "' 30rV10r+.. R•.•1111O111YY9W GOMA 42 40 3? 34 WIi 43 40 3? 34 43 rral.W.11513.1.004 wWaf cM.Y.YW ISE -D1- _B, US 43 40 ]i 00 u 2 HTS 1 1 AMPHENOL 2411 PANEL ANTENNA ANTENNA MOUNTING FLANGE TYPICAL EQUIPMENT ASSEMBLY roNannlPnoP CI 60% a&1WGNT LEO SeIOLE 86.0 ORACxEi II /II 131 (HTXCYNW33111414F%00) x.-- 7N WI, .. :�j0_ 'Pinion WI M04.• w 1, sr 4^ CABLE FEEDER A "` .: (NOTENQREEPEW ^� M. )I I031a PART 19 FROM 4. W 4nO u ...•• (I . • A31TE3a3A MANUFACTURE —4,r—E, 4.1 NI Om all 8480 Y A ,,0x84 48888 •x10 -A _ �l_�� *, / r� r• � • r- 4400• 1111,11110 x,.. .Ix. W• 1000 µA. OP C�'1s�.�-� I. -wr = A I A aw.. .. +84....•4 010.0 moi..a-1u� 1•••.r94a.W4.pI INFO y.Mow 484. W WM I 4 I Ist TP -21 142829 ! CROWN NG WEST, INC. NIWA4MA • 4W91)Vs0,U91100 Y awWa&u. 14.10 042 - CCI 13LtA0.MMW.1CAf0AS CONSULTAMS COASTAL CW W.. IUllgl /IOW, . Ann. IM Om44..O.4004 001T49M0 3AOrIUCIARVWO*MAT109 TIIL I?TgWA110V g011AP4a10114n 5000 OM W 100115 M0rNFIM Y AND fl0000.SrnAL S1 0 VEN00 AMYOSlO18 S xLOSVW.oerr IVLYAA% RE,310 l ! l 3204 SW NOW w! TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT I ANTENNAPCLE 8I9 OF REGNA DR 198 CIL OF VALENTNO WAY CIN OFTEMECU(A CA NOTES / AGR 12.18.12 TT 3 OF 9 B TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET UOHT /ANTENNA POLE S/S OF REGINA OR 195 CIL OF VALENTINO WAY CITY OFTEMECUTA,CA TP -21 142829 CROWN NG WEST, INC. }IF CA3C9 1.4 (Q1LA.TAIT IM3IRWAA .ATIOSS Ow..,1. 130.4 .114 (N1riMp r101Y1TA1w1p011NAw0. .11.19191..101.161/11.01,11. 4T n 00.17.1111.100?AAY A3. 0OW117r.YI14170 TIMM RAN WADI 11111,051.0711. 11...1 II 413.314 10930110!.13Sw}I.11Yw 1I.iu. TN DT 4.w NOTES AGR 112.18.12 4 OF 9 SCE APPROVED OMNV11{IE f1CVMAT101f9 KATHREIN SCALA W.I.IW" 3110211111. vpm /3•Tr.....kA.r.0 0r30334 .Tho• (KO :0270) 011111010./..00001w.. - METER PEDESTAL WT. MOOT (:aoAu. u,I..N3 w0ww103 3.1V•To r 3n.Irt-rw 0 1 00 ..11.00 0.1.1011 .'MGM OOOOOOOOOOOOOO plraal.rrvlrwq 434904) ..900/ 011316013...3 3/ 033341. EOAw..wTPUT RAT New Ira. * TAIONTIVNA PAM,. 110 POO. TO3 NT.A.I M,,O ., rs..Io3...tI.- N..}.3... 43 g00SC n4! a3..3..}M..o I.0131M n..I..m„}. maw ma. 1,41 MO 1rp2110 rr.nw V, ' N w ,.�r .aClr:AIVJV 13apI1Yw '3w1114N ,WRwa.Y 0-- �> • N4ry ....;.o.1 111,.......;..7. 1Avaw MME01t1Efl WCON 114, OrsaEAvtO °Anlocw.elEI IAY[fl YIIIII MVC! II 1.9LOPE4YYN IMYtOOMOTIII ACCESSOPENtw MOW NO:RPK 1. ROPE 1.8110 OW= ...::\ ou.nr3a vi Ua w VI 309.1 .Y MI .a R. w rw -, ••MpE W�,rw i�.ee'W✓+G5t.0 WOwi.PonFAI w'OWflVneqN 3wwe �w 11.11.1101. TNr041104t41 a'WO MOM% 0V VVAIVO.wyuwuW a411.VpNv.0.9r wi rMwrem OrarMall AM1 WIgNN r.b•r-1P Y4Tme .. 40. V w T V w . mer 00'. r V B a. s ) V t6 . DN. Dora Mro P riNfM1MN SO.IINrO1L w.A:TfN. n. y0 WV ..w 9709 .M. ROAN. .NM.nw .�= .N0 .w. .TTannr TO 03 ..this 6 —dii - I '.Ilii! CC�IE 11 POO WIN ,1\ IOr1 ..��[O•KVtI] SIDE `.. VIEW 030101 r100 DACASO IOM I OpOUT MONT VIEW TYPICAL ANTENNA ASSEMBLY 1trr PAP n9P I 1 RATRREIN ANITNRA soolono KATIIRFIN ANTENNA SERVICE ARFA PA7.10270 FLANGE SPUTTER S &CPUSE.LH EFEEDER Tf•VJ I lail. RtkirgliLia pASE ENCLOSED W CONCRETE sr11.. awaastartio0--... �T�.,.,na3nr POURING ... • Ownllawnrwawlw�cleewawnle.nru• u4. `.. • 0'� w W4 eir..007.NO....0.w. mai 1.OWw • WIIISITV KRIMST3 AMPWTCH IpRV I� 3 rA.M.0I 3.YPIPOr.Ir0r3PCMR.3'1TAW BASE CUM. �aErm.... T -c,-3e.:. — TP -21 142829 CROWN NG WEST, INC. }IF CA3C9 1.4 (Q1LA.TAIT IM3IRWAA .ATIOSS Ow..,1. 130.4 .114 (N1riMp r101Y1TA1w1p011NAw0. .11.19191..101.161/11.01,11. 4T n 00.17.1111.100?AAY A3. 0OW117r.YI14170 TIMM RAN WADI 11111,051.0711. 11...1 II 413.314 10930110!.13Sw}I.11Yw 1I.iu. TN DT 4.w NOTES AGR 112.18.12 4 OF 9 TP -21 .I-wuuu 142829 nom VCROWN IIi NG WEST, INC. N»MY YA"STC C1 MCAMTH CC1 I[N0ONIA NICA1OA CONWLTANN COASTALCOwW+'IGTOAT 3l,5%am.. a lM IIOIT»ONO PWAnuBr 1001NATAN NIL n100401[01 L'O.TAINT O!• I1 of JO OMAINOLNIIOMLLTAAYAMI 00M1OSNi10410818109 AWL•MOA 0NTAl OPOINi N 0.3 ARIAN 4O p iNO I.NOO FAIL AT OATS SCR. ramp 00 WARIMSN IATIONRA AASH \TXTOTE i ZOIMILM ILlnl LEW MOIL M.M.I..r TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET UGHT / ANTENNA POLE 5/S OF REGINA DR 195 CIL OF VALENTINO WAY CITY OF TEMECULA CA NOTES ) AGR 12.18.12 44,80,1801 TT 1.•5OF9 B GROUND ROD DETAIL 2411 x 38" FIBER SPLICE BOX TYPICAL GROUND DETAIL POLYMER CONCRETE ASSEMBLY • STRAIGHT SIDES, NO FLOOR, WUC 38- 20K,' sir HEX BOLTS. CROWN CASTLE LOGO 'EMBOSSED' (SPECIFY AT AWE OF ORDER) INSTALLED 1 WITH STUB•UP 32 X 14 CONCRETE UTILITY BOX W/COVFA 1Wm TEXTURED STEEL Mit Tc6TWTll A1ARVA N'XJ6'F10[A IfA1N01E OAAOEIINL %7 1 1 •I NC811H40_ TRAFFICAAFIONG LOT. SIDEWALK TN CONFORMS TO: • WUC3.6 ABTMQa67 .. ANSVSCTE77 / �. .�•;. FEATURES: `�- �fi0-OY '.•• �IRl�1fiY�--=�i1:S Iii •. • ����� • 62 MO CADWEID TYPE ear MOW 1dACOPPER CI GROUND ROOV Ilt � L1� I - I -_ - - USDAIAVS APPROVED SNIPPED ASSEMBLED '`\ • SKID RESISTANT COVER STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS • CAST.IN FLOATING NUT SOX -INTEGRAL DRAW HOLES • LIBER SPUCE BOC SHALL BE LABELED CROWN CASTLE 001101 EQUIPMENT WITH F WITH UMSTRUf FORFIBER SPLICEMONTK / A 1\\ 1i`-�,. \-, 1 .�� —__ ���' Is % em THGPE 4.1NPE FNEA 0RQAO 0800WI0800 6040 TO ELECTRON WW1 MOTEL 111 147%---" 110)— — NOTICE SIGNAGE PANEL SCHEDULE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM KA.. NTA SCALGNTS PROPOSED METER PEDESTAL 100. 1202408. 30.3W 420000% (MVERS POWER PRODUCT) ,.. ESA TP =•tl' 3N•F132 ONO PANEL 'A' lol Bs WLTS.-L RN? MIRE MLO rwEN111A 315 NOTICE € t € i € ; € �- ANN ARVH. "°'"" I ArmAi MCS H0 40.-00 1 » 3\--- 4 w A0TA.1H � l0 POW, a fns I ' 0.,,,,,TO Radlo frequency fields beyond tNs Print may a%0880 the FCC general Public exposure !MIL O'."/AI eed AMd40AM.MIM hOQlMlol' T A `-.. �_ �� 0l80U80 800 00 - 8 -0 40 rATwL _ 3'C UNDERGROUND TRENCH BCE VAULT6PHNVOVI 0 INA_A . NO MAR A_ly LNM11OI-o01Tw0A WNW/ PMttI'A' 20,1 400 II x .261700 8 --.:.-X MR /00151 MIT . _um_ TOTAL ODOR WIT. 7.x x80.1320 0 1 UTIUTY POINTS OF SERVICE AAO WORK/ MATERIALS 81N1YAi ARE BASED UPON PREl1YYlARY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE UTAITY COMPANIES/UV ARE FOR MO PURPOSES ONLY. 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITYCOMPANY FOR FOAL AND EXACT WORK I MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS AND CONSTRUCT 70 UTILITY COMPANY ENGINEERS* PLANS ANO SPECYTGTK lls ONLY CONTRACTOR 9HML FURNISH MID INSTALL ALL CONDUIT. PIAL ROPES. CABLES. BOXES. CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF CONDUIT OF REOVRED). TRANSFORMER PAD, BARRIERS, POLE RISERS. TRENCI*10, DOtTAL, PAY ALL UTRRVCOMPANY FEES ANO INCLUDE ALL REQUIREMENTS IN SCOPE OF YORK O 20A )(EY NOTES: POLEOROONO ROD- O O YC•3NH800 O E.olo 2.Mrs wWAvB M nIrnYOlralMl •"'�•"""" ` .wr_/ ...MI LOW. YETI 7% SQUARE D LOAD CENTER E002.LT0Re ND -TANDEM BREAKERS 030T2020 OR EQUAL 1FTCy112.11120 L.6', VEERED J/4'fi132 010 TO POLE GROUND 1500 40W4,0U 0 AOWAU 0 ANORCW 0 ION NOC TEL 4i: 800.788.7011 TP -21 1121 'R`i`>,E 1131—son-- 1141. w�E TP -21 .I-wuuu 142829 nom VCROWN IIi NG WEST, INC. N»MY YA"STC C1 MCAMTH CC1 I[N0ONIA NICA1OA CONWLTANN COASTALCOwW+'IGTOAT 3l,5%am.. a lM IIOIT»ONO PWAnuBr 1001NATAN NIL n100401[01 L'O.TAINT O!• I1 of JO OMAINOLNIIOMLLTAAYAMI 00M1OSNi10410818109 AWL•MOA 0NTAl OPOINi N 0.3 ARIAN 4O p iNO I.NOO FAIL AT OATS SCR. ramp 00 WARIMSN IATIONRA AASH \TXTOTE i ZOIMILM ILlnl LEW MOIL M.M.I..r TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET UGHT / ANTENNA POLE 5/S OF REGINA DR 195 CIL OF VALENTINO WAY CITY OF TEMECULA CA NOTES ) AGR 12.18.12 44,80,1801 TT 1.•5OF9 B TP -21 11.N1[L'V. 142829 J D(CROWN NG WEST, INC. 1131 TA7N Avg STECf LI vm.GA9IIM 11irIIM.Sl4 CCI IEKWVMMVGARONS CONS.ATANTS W{STALO NUNICATIONS MS Nolo MON.IN Os41 yfMt NIOMILTARV R:FO*MAIgN 1115 PTOII W nPV OVRAtNID N AIN SEI OFOMT /. ITADIMTAAVAND WMX,C1IIALTOVWOWN AI, MON NSCLORIRS MERMAN AS R MLAfl3 TOVWSGN5YOJC1 VIR0111MF0 MOW MEAT Wait • e. 2011. NNW IN (II ti TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE SIS OF REGINA DR 185' OIL OF VALEMNO WAV CITY OF TESECUTA CA PROFILES AGR 12.18.12 -."6" OF9 \ B 11)NAINAF,fl WNW SOVILEMCA A13r CROVM CAME TO LAT./ WRR013p IMSINW MID LLMNME TO NEW STEEL IDOWIETWIWET LKM 0.101401.0.012 mA3AMM PAM, AManAs1e14tarva2oo It T3ilNaOSTM POI! TNR A!1 r . \ 1�NfIuaN':Jc teAtai��P vp \O110111Dtt�el C�IL AM�A,/t101tk NAR m:o Ana I' i 1 t ITyr 1 l il Va U.. ' . r . . . Typ RNEAA TSP r - OF WV, Al - f :7{ ti . \ -- ,', i J' AGW'p� b •,\i✓' a \ � ��,�,,`�/\,�\ ,,,,,A.,.,,,,,,,s1,,,; MAKE READY TEKTUREO STEEL STREET UGHT /ANTENNA AMA NEW CONSTRUCTION CROWN CASTLE TO MSTALL NEW 37 TEMUREO STEEL POLE CRUM CASTLE TO HUTCH SURROUNDING TMST AMMO MAIMS TO/14W81EXMIBOREIL POLE 1118 TALL CIRCUIT BREAKER AT TO. INSTALL 12) ION ANDREWS RAD OS CN THE DOCLOCK AND 30 CLOCK POSITION AT 17 r. INSTALL (2)I0N ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE OO'CLOCK AND 3OCLOCK POSITION AT W 7'. NSTALL(3)24•AAMPICNOI PNIEL ANTENNAS 0.08/96111162170 AT 0.1120./240. ADA11101S Km A RAD CENTER OC 2T 8'. NSTALL(1)K HIM TW SECTOR ANTENNA 080610/70 ON TOP OF POLE INSTALL(I)2P A3V FBER MICE 130X INSTALL (ZIOROSND TEST WELLS. INSTALL (2) GROUND RODS INSTALL (1) METER PEDESTAL NOTES: TOTAL STRUCTURE HEIGHT W B' ANTENNA TYPE (1) KATHREII IRI SECTOR T O PLNSOMICIPNIL)D/rxuttxT.r AZIMUTHS: O./1WI210 REGINA DRIVE EDGE OF PAVEMENT oa /r\ x 240°, x O Z 0' 120' L 90' A 1 12 O'CLOCK VIEW 1 KALI•-'-lw 13 1 ANTENNA DETAILS i I TP -21 11.N1[L'V. 142829 J D(CROWN NG WEST, INC. 1131 TA7N Avg STECf LI vm.GA9IIM 11irIIM.Sl4 CCI IEKWVMMVGARONS CONS.ATANTS W{STALO NUNICATIONS MS Nolo MON.IN Os41 yfMt NIOMILTARV R:FO*MAIgN 1115 PTOII W nPV OVRAtNID N AIN SEI OFOMT /. ITADIMTAAVAND WMX,C1IIALTOVWOWN AI, MON NSCLORIRS MERMAN AS R MLAfl3 TOVWSGN5YOJC1 VIR0111MF0 MOW MEAT Wait • e. 2011. NNW IN (II ti TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE SIS OF REGINA DR 185' OIL OF VALEMNO WAV CITY OF TESECUTA CA PROFILES AGR 12.18.12 -."6" OF9 \ B TP -21 IINECUU gtI'nr••A 14282.9 l ociR,RtiyN, NG MST, INC lllSr'4116TEt! M ra4am CCI 1E1.EC010101CA1NN3 CO:SULTMIS COASTALCO,Iwl'ATnSS )115 mow A.. 3N114 s{0513 17.01311.9110 -OIFIGTNY11ROa1NTpR TI111turaS(41101•10003114016911IS BEI OFDMNTOSISIRGPN307A CDT110ENTN.TOWSP4.. AMIN0E OR DEO1O1 MAN AT R AL NW t0MIK. IsE711 RYtAD1111RM HIO11T1N0 CALL AT W31TAO OATS KIVU WN PG UMOpOtfum,CI3t 1AUIt r O. TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET DONT I ANTENNA POLE SIS OF REGINA OR 1ES CA. OF VALENTINO WAY CITY OF TEMECUA, CA PROFILES ACR 70F9 12.18.12 TT B MTN;KATMM1 SCALA •011 SEI 3 313M I. t3Do-tmro ME WAA 6069SNEETT. ACE DETMf a I ON*MI 1 ' W Or POLE AT VW•' , •1 •• "0,,0331, - 13 r ' A.. I"_'/�// �'�r�y I•r \� \r \`\: 'Y. ` / d, / \\ ��jj� \�\ A k /�i�Y t%is \ �OSIMA RWNWu !i\ OeEOIiNLM�A/�LYE�Tfl `%'� ,.. 'h0/rOr/\ \�O?iii//��l�r�\\'ii fid` i}i9`o,,, r/+i,4,. A) IOP OF SERVICE AIGATNI' I a�1oAtMW�N O MEW sTEEilExnnmamEET LgMI TDtA POLE •SNENOLPANEI 131NN NA AMENS 0696416.104,70AVrr'NN1AA (SEE DEUX AONINLET SI _- G .-.I W3l•Wna1OMTNI WMXI0.3311 lS%SSIEO E OUOCTM$1I4AAON ILA (OROETAMEIIIIS ON S) (SEEgTM9 ttS1SpI8KET 5) 'SWALL(I)1Na0DNIECTa01t 1. 01EEDETAxSd1aNEET T]4) 1 ) xz�1 �/ 'TJ• - ,I. 3 \\/Qv,.•_ALLFRR Aiwa sox . F;. li / area TAAHps-RM A . `J` 1\ �:�. 49,4,‹ 4p6.- �slorfrir igT t Y', uMIOlGIL 660NP4,,,. ra ra�i��'L'. `�tij\' { yS i itilily * , • !.M'NIWME TO NATOIA6100.11 7s10 MST APN IIIDU IONR”O MOY MIDIPIAPPI. pR t1a3tAAMN6Nt9[. r)NATNSEEI /M A00A02ro ice! ` _ \ n 31043 PAWL ])' TFATLREO (TER GCSE C'¢W 1O'I'<AR l VP SECTOR ON I TOP OF BERv10EAREAATTT i' I IM O/.NIn I,. , r .�.I ''r.;srr•. 11 I I` .) '�T II) NAT11]EATRI ANTB6N SRPMII. f« <+.,0,, AMA ATlrr irp gv h,(C,... •_ • I(xM PIXf Atm, P 1 7,, cEMFe.I TPY 00.>...."0 7'AI "T �- • I TOPO1 I' ' 13 './ CROSMCAS?IE TO. MATE I SIAMO3M ID NNRE AaTARMN10 IAMATO NEW aTEB.IEXRAEOSINEET I1GM]NIIEMN POLE SECTOR ;j� 3IN•N/MENR PAWL 11 , AMEMM! 11005.1.301/101411005.1.301/1011005.1.301/101410I t • IT 1.11.11POSTI10.POtl .. 1S O¢CU{NtAFSO Al try ''‹,\4*fsf, l\Yr.,4 ,d, \i/' /�•Ci1`,C� \if\moi \W ♦ \ rr v \�'\\ \/\ , O/Of\\/r� 1, VX,/ r,T 4\�-` t/ .. r ia�' \\`�/�/ \ / / ,%,,,,{ \ai /\�t/lir\� ,! \ \ - Y q o/iYnr/\j� ,\iSS�`� '7 \i / QI�\\/`. .O�\//\%/�G ` �,i�[.r.r. '. "I- i S�:r. +i' _� 1 , 4 . �.,./.0.-s.` \• i . ✓o�\� •\ ,%.4.,"/ e/ �\/� �'7i,� '\,� i * . .0 \/t lSr\ `C tT< ' �/%"e\ ' \ /� \ \'\, i r yid\L�9 �'k,•• lr' - .a1 \\/ ,,. \/l'o,f@! �( rq�z,` ,�ry 1i a1d rNu3ioN yi,�it�Cj/;�� :Y fv4.f,;y\ '''.r`R', C 13 O'CLOCK VIEW 1 !CALL .1.1..141. D 1 6 O'CLOCK VIEW I .CALL. Ar• 1. ' E 19 O'CLOCK VIEW KAU-LW-Iv' TP -21 IINECUU gtI'nr••A 14282.9 l ociR,RtiyN, NG MST, INC lllSr'4116TEt! M ra4am CCI 1E1.EC010101CA1NN3 CO:SULTMIS COASTALCO,Iwl'ATnSS )115 mow A.. 3N114 s{0513 17.01311.9110 -OIFIGTNY11ROa1NTpR TI111turaS(41101•10003114016911IS BEI OFDMNTOSISIRGPN307A CDT110ENTN.TOWSP4.. AMIN0E OR DEO1O1 MAN AT R AL NW t0MIK. IsE711 RYtAD1111RM HIO11T1N0 CALL AT W31TAO OATS KIVU WN PG UMOpOtfum,CI3t 1AUIt r O. TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET DONT I ANTENNA POLE SIS OF REGINA OR 1ES CA. OF VALENTINO WAY CITY OF TEMECUA, CA PROFILES ACR 70F9 12.18.12 TT B TP -21 TO.DCV41 142829 CROWN NG WEST, INC. .t1 Wrio.A,.5itC CCI tCtKOSO&RICATIONT 00.SO[TAMO cOASTALCOOMINICATm, MOM01101R IN011.01tl IPUYRtDTARYIN 001.01.1 llb INOR.AIIIXSOOMAIMO IN TILS SET Of DMS1NR 4.M.0.OY ARU Dt1ClO341.010 A1mN ANY MMS R O,o vIsLt OTIRRnun As0.03 TO AM .' IS 51,1017Y RRO.NIRo mol Eru TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE 8/9 OF REGINA DR 195' CIL OF VALENTI NO WAY CITY OF TEMECULA. CA ( SITE PHOTOS AOR 112.18.12 TT ~8OF9 l B �1 r, _., r j {J Approx. £37' _, i ...._ C NDGBIDGATIDN A 1 KEY MAP B I 1 O'CLOCK VIEW y � PROPOSED NODE LOCATION : r" _— --. _ +• PROPOSED NODE LOCATION . �, C 1 12 O'CLOCK VIEW D 1 11 O'CLOCK VIEW TP -21 TO.DCV41 142829 CROWN NG WEST, INC. .t1 Wrio.A,.5itC CCI tCtKOSO&RICATIONT 00.SO[TAMO cOASTALCOOMINICATm, MOM01101R IN011.01tl IPUYRtDTARYIN 001.01.1 llb INOR.AIIIXSOOMAIMO IN TILS SET Of DMS1NR 4.M.0.OY ARU Dt1ClO341.010 A1mN ANY MMS R O,o vIsLt OTIRRnun As0.03 TO AM .' IS 51,1017Y RRO.NIRo mol Eru TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE 8/9 OF REGINA DR 195' CIL OF VALENTI NO WAY CITY OF TEMECULA. CA ( SITE PHOTOS AOR 112.18.12 TT ~8OF9 l B NODECOORONATE LA115WE 33.5241 lwaNa .Ilf MOS 11' N r N APN 0980291014 REG9 ('2 STA.103 00 V0 12II WAV 2 A 100.110 EXISTING STORLIDRAIN ;\ PER TRACT NO 23173.1 �, 99 DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER TRACT NO 23173-1 NORI1I SCALE: 1' — 20' 104 INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (T B O.C.) STA 98.05 SITE LOCATION PLACE STEEL TEXTURED ANTENNA POLE (r B O.C.) STA 58.02 INSTALL GROUND r ESr WELL SR8 LOCATION MSTAII FIBER SPLICE SCR /NSTALI GROUND TEST WELL ENLARGED VIEW APN 0980291013 EXISTING SCE HANDHOLE (10'8.0.C) STA .97.61 `- INSTALL ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL (r 600.) STA 97.61 INSTALL FIBER SPLICE BOX (rso.c) STA 97 • 96 INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (TB00) STA 97.99 APN 0960292001 TP -21 142829 (� /JQCROWN NC WEST, INC. 1„l.Aaf A..3,LLT 1 LA Vas CA 61110 twusneA+4m n..f,�rrw CCI TTAT<OAOR11.101110. 90163333(11 COASTAL <17IIMONI<AOo13 115541„14..241 P101MR/AMYIMMN\11V1 111% IKORMA110N CONTAINED M 1114 SU Of 0MlS05 u IRaRETMV AAV D000$06001 H1nu1*SITPOA7l1 10 KOJLON , SlYCIIYfi011IYWWD TP -21 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LPGHT /ANTENNA POLE SIS OF REGINA DR 195' CIL OF VALENTINO WAY CITY OF TEMECULA, CA ( SITE PLAN AGR 12.18.12 TT' 9 OF 9 B ACROWN W Y CASTLE NG WEST, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE /013 STTi AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. A:MD'1.M04.1 ILOcwa-C an Ixtwa4 TP -23 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE N/S OF REDHAWK PKWY 15' C/L OF CALLESTTO VALLARTA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA 90618 YK INSTALL NODE LOCATION N.T.S. VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL NEW 32' TEXTURED STEEL POLE. CROWN CASTLE TO MATCH SURROUNDING MAST AFGHANI) LUMINARE TO NEW STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT/ ANTENNA POLE. INSTALL CIRCUIT BREAKER ATT 0'. INSTALL (2)1014 ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9 O'CLOCK AND 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 12' T. INSTALL (2)10H ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9 CLOCK AND 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 19' T. INSTALL (3) 24' AMPHENOL PANEL ANTENNAS 9390.89611710-2170 AT 0' / 120' / 240' AZIMUTHS WITH A RAD CENTER OF 2T INSTALL (1) KATHREIN TRI SECTOR ANTENNA 9800.10270 ON TOP OF POLE, INSTALL (1) 24' x 38' FIBER SPLICE BOX, INSTALL (2) GROUND TEST WELLS. INSTALL (2) GROUND RODS. INSTALL (1) METER PEDESTAL PROJECT SUMMARY /HPJR NUMBER: DESCIUPTION nTLESHFPT NOTES a DETADS NOTESaDEUDs NOUS ao3TAI1S NOTES a DETAILS 6 POLI IROPIIE POLI PROFILE SDE PHOTOS SDE HAN SHEET INDEX J PROJECT MANAGER: CROWN CASTLE 1100 DEXTER AVENUE STE 250 SEATTLE, WA 96109 SIEVE WEINGARDT (805)235.1431 STEVEN. W EINGARDT@CRO W NCASTLE,COM NODE ENGINEER: COASTAL COMMUNICATIONS 3333 MISSION AVE STE 234 OCEANSIDE, CA. 92058 TODD THREW (760) 754.9240 EXT. 101 TODD®COASTALCOMMTNC.COM CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CROWN CASTLE 1100 DEXTER AVENUE STE 250 SEATTLE. WA 98109 STEVE PATINO (903)234-1431 STEPHBN.PATINO.CONTRACTOR@CRO WNCASTLB.COM JAN 14 2013 /iOV66( alr84'? Ry6(tIL1sg' to 8.D Lo5X54, • PROJECT TEAM 1 TP -23 ,HIPCIRA 142829 VICR�OWN NG WEST, INC. Ntl Wr1�1AR STE 13 IAV,O,ACASI:A TE ECOMMINICIa10,3 COMAATAIM COASTAL COMMMMATGVY 111M4sMe>.111 NCI MAZID PROISCf*RY pr01 W A110M NC MFWNATIONCOMAINDN IMf SU OP DM W MOT 191RpRENMY AMU COMAE MIAL TOVAMC MOS DDOWMCA UTANTRAM AMRIIO.A IS W TOYiUM If iT11K. Y1.01111ITFD IffO:M.M1p GILL AT LUST MO VAYoIT4OIE YOU 010 MIRIDRMMD/M1Y4AUlt 1IT:OI TP -23 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REDHAWK AVE 15' CIL OF CALLESTTO VALLARTA CITY OF TEMECULA. CA TITLE SHEET AGR 112.19.12 TT ` 1 OF 9 A LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION =AU •IH1N..w .1 . LN—,I,R. CONN.: 1,0,.x1) A... X10 ABBREVIATIONS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: IWNEMYIFAM1WAI e4c, CONI MI, MIOKtOO IILLTNY1011 WAIMA(MMI0RL HULL6L 1111101I100 0111110 CRMOACICR OR 120.0U.11101161106111.0 0101002t011111)01 1. ALLRWOIRITMOS OF THLCITY Or t Wt<LU-WM OBYELOPMFTrtMAMUL,STOLM WATER STANIFAROS MUST REINCORPORATED MRO TIEDFMQNANDCONSRRUCTION Of 1116 MOROSW WOtIC 1101101161.1841$CONSISTIOrt.FIR 1110$1011CONTROURAti 10201011 WATER POU.VIMV CONTROL PM. (WPCPSn NPLM:ABLL S FOR ST011.61 DR/101 PLUS. I QVOR A GRAVEL BAG SILT OASM80601ATELY URTRPAM Of MLBTM DUCAT°DV DLTAO-t 1. 111E COMIRACTOR OR QUALT,D FUSON SHALL. BE 02402.210521 fOR C1.6AM/P O15tT ANO M1)000 AOACM sIR16T(3) AND STORM ORAM 6YSM M DUE TO COMSTRUCUGH ACINRY. I.IUELOMMCT06 SHALL newt KT 04E013•71111 IACB,I lea MAIM. 3 1I000MtNI AIA WORKERS FOR6MFR0EWCY WOMSNALL 0E1.4100AVARAOLO Al AUTOS DIM/20 THE RAM SEASON 6 221E02.21IMCTORSKAU.RESTQREAIAMQ300EO4ID1•0111TC01.11101, DOMES TO WORKING ORDER TO THC SATISFACTION Or Ten CHV woe. oE RESIDENT 1TYNOaR AFTQMOIRAACFT PeODUW1f RRINTALL IN6C010TMOOR SHALL DSTALL AOOMOIML FAOHDH6EWOWM CONTROLMFASGI6S AS MAV Be 11.10.110.110111,11ERESILOORINCINEER DUE TOOWOUSeo,.1oMSTANCU WNITHMny AIM. I Au.660SIONSEdMFMCRV1110I. MEASURES PROVIDED NR Tie APPROVED DRRfWDORF22UNSNAu 061:CORPOMIW UMW, oil YIOSIow2ro ILNr CONTROL FOR POEM 02.2201110221311/11.1.06 DONE ,01Nt M,I51AC110N OFTI6 RESIDOn dONEEA O. ALL REMORA 01,0 PROIeOIVS OMVKE55110101 MALL R6 R1 RACE Ai 1110111212 OF LACK WO0RM0 DAY WREN RANHIADRHFIT 10 TIKOCROMCTOI SMALLARMN06 FOR WEPXLV MWTDI05 MAURO 0006E111ST TO 011121.30111 FOR ?MONO' TEAM (6DER.LL CONIMCI01L QOA1fl0D FERSON. 1:1105/011(01M101. S116001ORACTOR IT AMY. ENGONEM Of WOW,.OWMPNtvMAIEN AMIN6RTSRILNT Documa,To EVALUATETREADEQUACY OF 2116FRONONSEDDHMT CONTROL WARMER ARO OI11D1RCLATEO CONS1MMg»ACTMRTA STORMDRAIN INLET PROTECTION E OF PAVEMENT SPILLWAY, I -DAG HIGH FLOW SANDBAG 2.BAGS HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FQR INLET WITH OPPOSING FLOW DIRECTIONS EDGE OF PAVEMENT INLET SPILLWAY, I -BAG MOH - SANDBAG 2•9AOS HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH SINGLE FLOW DIRECTION NOTES: 0. INTENDED FOR S(H3RT. TERN ImF. 2. USE TO INHIBIT NON .STMLI WATER FLOW, 3, ALLOW FOR PROPER MAINTENANCE AND CLEANUP. I. BAGS MUST B6 REMOVED AFTER ADJACENT OPERAT20N IS CVNPIETE0 S. NOT APPLICABLE W AREAS WITH IOW( SH.TS AND CLAYS WITHOUT Rum FABNG NOTES: 1 CdOMCr011f0MSNdt AFL own 000003001 T CONRUct0n00M00 sM1C5.b, 600.0 011101.1...STORMOW2111Ltrs TD PaiNFRIT COMAOMATW MATER 1 1000011E Wla KOOrtSTOALOOYWAESTONOO/KRTWLL 165W VP/MDCLfAFNAf 1.1.0010 • CONTRF.CTO020AfPATOAMGEO WALK 0610.OV2116NT0 10 T150AT 3CICN0F TIM WV 5310110@1 0 CUM S OUITIR TOW PPOTCCIW Pi OCI WMX TORE RERACE0 TOTE 0A11EFACTCN Of TIE COY 0N0lEEt 0 TMCONTRACTORSIALI RF$1000 TM ROAM. BACKTO OS QIDNAL CONDOM SATSTACTORY TO TME COY 0.006011112.1.00.3.6u2 NOT UMBO TO PAN110.0lR WRL SINE IMb, MY W M Mara YEE EOLt NOIMPPN Wee O11FCIORI F EpYINnSIWLN16S1tORgRERA6[O RiLCITY0EIO501HISIApA10aMW105O.05 010.0110600100 M I-CBTRVIRNMMRANoraloYTNE(D ROW GROUND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 2: i I A CROWD CO26021 CIN;1 TO10 IVFXCLMN ALLMRNRNAILS,STAPIJS,00N0NLyD VMLICAISOC 301 POLE ALLCONSTRUn4011S11ALL OE M ACCSIMMK6 WONMVMOPALCOUNTYSTAIt COMW4.0013AND OOIN EMMEN Mb 160NAPIDM. CALL UM.,1IoAIS MOOR TO ERCA VnTOA 0211061122.2010/1111 ALLLANDSCAIMO TOMRPSTOAWTM MOM. COMMON OR UTTER ALLOQUPMIM T0e1001SW 15100010 CA605T MOIRES W CLEARANCE AT 000M OPBIND CAVLI2 CARNET BASE AT PAO. NORMAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: LOCA FINN A6L 0900 OF FMf MTM0 AIA FRp*310 LMLa1RS MDIT OR 2ROV102D or 0E SVOOTMR AND SHORN ON ANY RAMS SMARM TO TUE EOM Of MYR ROM, f011 APIROML 3.11ANOISINAY11R IIRAt1Ra11YTO1M1.q PLOLICW-Rf p CAM tE W61rn% rhOUTICe CC1.W.ILTS Bernd Rd UUtm CM6fAFI fS FACILITES. YNTO AND 11040SEEE MV SI O R MDNALI.YIUSO&VW BY Me UIMIYCOIWANISS WR W150L1ALSOISALR7.T1OI0 0NYMAMIILVLN PLALRDWTNOIN6 1MIWAIKS4TEME OIAASatoM11 1MMMA1 T r1AMBlVR605 MARLS MAY US PLAOO M mon 1T1N2T1F$ TWICE SMELT TO 21110011nL OF COY FMOHEBLON MOM CALIFORNIA STATE CODE COMPLIANCE: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES: CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (INCLUDING TITLES 24 & 25) 2010 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES WHICH ADOPTS THE 2010 UDC, 2010 UMC, 2010 UPC AND THE 2010 NEC. BUILDING OFFICIALS & CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA) 2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ANSI/EIA-222.7 LIFE SAFETY CODE NEPA-101 2010 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 2010 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE 2010 LOCAL BUILDING CODE CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN IMITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. FCC NOTE: THIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR RADIO FREQUENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT OF 1996 AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS AND ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY STATE OR FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES TP -23 TEM n 142829 CROWN NG WEST, INC. 2110 WV. A 90 �V�m�Mls 11.11R,•15F CCI • rtS000MM1ArICAICIS COiNLTAMS COASTALCONNI 1CA /R 20 .. An O00616c6 ROM Rp13NIC IROIIIILTAMV INTO0MAT6V CINIOMIATANC0. ALNLDMOI6 O Of VOcr DSNBODMETARY MOO L C00c000 IML TOMM.*WAN OO1115011 0IO3U Vl6 OMCI THAN AS R MLATO tOTRaO16 TARTLY NoWIW �DI 1 610222Nd GUAR VAST TBO IAY9JV050 VW 000 Y a0.011ONONANETALMT AJlrut1 _30 TP -23 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE NIB OF REDHAWK AVE 11' GL OF CALLESTTO VAUARTA CRY OF TEMECULACA NOTES OVAmer AGR 12.19.12 2 OF 9 NOTES ) 101.00 . 14..Po...v* P0.ero1ur.10g1L5T4q 5010204 1150,210 11000 Saab, .n.0.1n ..134130/11.443 FP.I AL «n..nn w 0.00 .10, "10..13 .4000.0MW Mill CC c....! 41..n4 a.1 wwenoi.00 91 c1m•m. E2000APCV OFF 1.4".10.300 43 n440.0 04.404 I. ertA mouTorn0.4.40 100- F.110e.1. 31.4..4.0. CMOS 17111144_44 _)_4 3_ M COM. 04.403 01010 Cm.. 000Com.. 111.0 Y OM..4 4O. 30..4.7 ?OWL L 10114..13. Ayes .A FNII.r Syy/ PT UL .a OL 414. sn 0,..a01 3.1 ...• 601700 tUL 10. 0..3x,.44. Ctn041.4404 par. OO Too IL, IOL 11+01 370"^40->4. 0013 a. ..0. swan *t pl.trp.ea.. 135 1 *1(D1K41'• MIv.4. F4.404>va6• OF.,.. ..44.1.........m.-tr. (A) /3)l 150 4 10 70007040.44 (3274014516 0114 r44+t. 04 I0.6 gxh•O[. W.6, .4 l) 201107 P.m 00 10 FJ.Aw-.. A. 70144 021.0,1101 0...4 ..... r.p Y 3310 00 Fnal+cv 0./"...V kT*e..bGron U04 050 LT TN NT 776)2263 For Pon no De..tr3 13511151 0*.0000.0.01 14)3.14. der NCC.*. 3 4 4 034EyE 41 40 21 54 C00% 43 40 63 50 43 40 31 34 076 L7E 41 40 37 34 1 W..U.1.•.4.4p.11µ.-43. u✓/ 30000"0.1 JO II5.1. a.a. 11.44.. r• pw....> ar..r....40 ANDREW ION-M7P / 7P / EU MULTI -SAND, MULTI -OPERATOR REMOTE OPTICAL SYSTEM 1201 02 0• AIA [1L DISCONNECT BOX (70A, Main Type: Fixed - Factory Installed main lugs, 1 -Phase (0024L70R8) Sown 1.T 10.4a.n 140.4 SIL r 100•000/010... 0110. .t0..1.t1.l.tr. t..0.t..vw worm. 0011 00110 0101.4.11 501143501 10001.0.10010110 0.10.010 /1100 .101.00.0 000. .01 0100 010.00 (01.1101 400001.1. 000 1.1101 110.04 011 440.0001 04.14.000T .000.0.0.011.11 0.34 AmTior. 0.1010 made 104▪ 1 .0.0. ..00 1 411.41 00.10000 043.4.s.""°144.00.....4000.00.44.44..40..44.0.4. ▪ 040 t00014004000.111.1 1.0▪ 0.00 me 2 I 445 TYPICAL EQUIPMENT ASSEMBLY 40504(131P.18P 078CONNECTBOX SWRAIOKT 0.00 4*10LE BOLT BRACKET � r1� t•.cT� AMPHENOL 24" PANEL ANTENNA (HTXCWW80111414FA00) 111.0.. 111.__. ._. .00 1.00 ..A 001 .d 01100114 .110 1 ... *10 1 • 0 I ... •110 .1110 01.11 - 4010.4.50 1..0..16. 0.01 11.10.0.011. 1.40011.0.0.0 410 061 1 10.40 NNW. 04•0 w.. 1r•1010*•1+ 0.00. PIN M ..100.00 I4▪ ..ww1w'T0•1..04 1-r 00 4 ANTENNA MOUNTING FLANGE CABLE FEEDER (NOTENORRERE0 THIS IS PART IS FROM ANTENNA MANUFACTURE A.4 TP -23 Idea. 148229 I CROWN wi (Ac,o1 NG WEST, INC. 3111>4f..A.t 131609 k.0, 1rllr.ttr IOLI400114U0MA110W LGMWTAMI COASTAL 0114 ^-CAT6M 3313141.444 Aro 94.531 O.mrWP52M4 (00112431* I10IIIITA'T 000003434. 010 100130TI14 M.TA. .) t0I 0,1 MOW oMMT01n*07067 A.L C.11L.TtAL 1013'01150. 3001x40. 700040. 4 ncirivfl041T1* IX P 1114.4 I KANT.% CALL AT VAST TOM 041.31100006 TOO Op 0101114.44 50AVIC0 ALCM TICYStI 1.0111.0.1 00, 01.11414. TP -25 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE N18 OF REDHAVMAVE 1a' CR.OF CALLESTTO VALLARTA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA AGR 12.19.12 TT 3 OF 9 A l TP -23 142829 i ACROWN NG WEST, INC. 1141w4S1A.YIELY km ccI TELCLE. AIT.1gU CO.nLLTAM9 6A16.ALOOYMUMKAl1aV6 IIM Me.....21. n.yiH.9N0 al0Fq.TAAV000ow4T01. 1114114404.41.47.KONTAIM. DOM SET OF 01)0'0.06Rr004 4 0 09U40AM0 g6N COgI1AL TO TINA ATPWIU Oa1AE 0I10A TIAM A6 R FS .A.lO 1011..00. IS MIK. FROMa1I60 TP -23 STEEL TEXTURED STREET L)OHT 6 ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REDHAWK AVE 15 CIL OF CALLESTTO VALIARTA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA NOTES AGR 12.19.12 wlsgaN TT 4 OF 9 A OENEML$PKIfCA110N1 KATHREIN SCALA reC4X.4.'4WA IxISCE APPROVED :IOroYO 604„.5, u•r°.. w°'Nb m.6Mw 44.1 4... rox4lwxq.wad KM 10NU'Iata :lama – I., an 070040x0 04x4,.... �r.W V.uw.M..0iralol X0.s$Ww0v,.A 44/Mlw,. 02x01 METER PEDESTAL..:wlo X16-- (1..4.muw+...n1"\ \ , 0000 1 Pca Kan n .44 4401..) 4070.404046704 .a .4+1 .usA 01m.l4.461.441 woo 64.4044W.- 00.0(0•04 M.N. 1 00M. a46.a40016Ca01l6 w. 04...1. VS.. D0 MID..OEiFREOCItET WWI..4.4.644.644.. o'—.l eadd•o+r a'46•a+,'N�'., , r ....Ito MMUS r O.., 44 , .nan.A.an '11400 100114 5 ;T.TTr. aJ 1111 w6 4* r. OS a. • 0 M. w. • OAM.A. r V IV V d 10. r Y 1V M0¢1O.IAENM01101 0<04.1..140.4 4.44n44R 61K4000 Or 0444040 7'FWrAgr6l11 A.M aCCMM.¢rTlNlc RdO O60vA704P.IY *MP °p.°aa Now. ammutworr NA r r b T d r w' . r r K IMAM.n�N4 1x 16 I. b 17 .6 .6 4 Ix N w B .O1M4. d OR0'm n lO x n �(.rYl6/+ me aCIOP AT .a .w .wt I . L11ir - n . - Wt..1Qaa4gN 11NOI00E,E11WAW11 11 OW 6ER1•FE 0warnnwwl0lc ADL°0NN146 1 P. MS� 'I pI /-0[11fO.hUA VNIXAIO\T! W.A.',SLOPE IYg1lOORtlfE 1 ,. 7.1111' IfME1,1 • WKAET,/, IIAADAx100 1.0.110 'UID `�'�.�CWMfE `"— SIDE VIEW aA01W A00 KO FRONT VIEW 4101.41. IwAlall AOaml .a� MO . 0 60.1.646 . WA w B Mi r TYPICAL ANTENNA ASSEMBLY s.00FPERw o 04104.00 RCD Y NNA m&SELMER?CPOSEi-N ::: SERVICEAREA 600-10270 FLANGE LE FEEDER • I r• n ,Ia'. .. +1 p I ' 4•. [ Ix•114 BASE ENCLOSED W OW:NM, >rionam•. ......or4.o 6.a.an..aa k6e MOUNTING -- 1L'� ... 77— ....0..00 EASE DETAIL son.1 /MIA Iu.."'• axa.wr wu.6u•Eaaanm00 NNW a10w6ia2.1 . .weaq . ...... .M.AWD.O.A..MN 107070..10. TOP VIEW [ a 1r t. 17 I *0:i1 TP -23 142829 i ACROWN NG WEST, INC. 1141w4S1A.YIELY km ccI TELCLE. AIT.1gU CO.nLLTAM9 6A16.ALOOYMUMKAl1aV6 IIM Me.....21. n.yiH.9N0 al0Fq.TAAV000ow4T01. 1114114404.41.47.KONTAIM. DOM SET OF 01)0'0.06Rr004 4 0 09U40AM0 g6N COgI1AL TO TINA ATPWIU Oa1AE 0I10A TIAM A6 R FS .A.lO 1011..00. IS MIK. FROMa1I60 TP -23 STEEL TEXTURED STREET L)OHT 6 ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REDHAWK AVE 15 CIL OF CALLESTTO VALIARTA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA NOTES AGR 12.19.12 wlsgaN TT 4 OF 9 A TP -23 rT�1LctXi. 142829 W 1( '1 `1Ii.1 NG WEST, INC. TIM WYd1 Art=Ct 444•44a4441.44ase = CCI TFACLWMNICNOM,X OMWLTANIF COASTALCOIWVOCATION{ 111114Eim 111 " O✓,OOH0M Pea 7.7340 0801.1004030. WOW.. 1101 M0 W "ROK COMM V f 71 TNf 1170101000W[BI007NVM1YRUO (00010041141.1071000774 .074147[0[ IMIOR1.20111t1t11110ALIT410113 TO V%lIWl l [ICTCllrnlIlIMI 40044704.7040$121144 01701 TIDIETI l Min TP -23 STEEL TEXTURED STREET UGHT I ANTENNA POLE 73/5 OF RED)AWKAVE 15' CIL OF CALLESTTO VALLARTA CITY OF TEMECUTA. CA ( NOTES ) / ou AGR 12.19.12 Awewn111 TC 50F9 A TYPICAL GROUND DETAIL GROUND ROD DETAIL 24" x 36" FIBER SPLICE BOX POLYMER CONCRETE ASSEMBLY • STRAIGHT SIDES. NO FLOOR, WUC 38 20K, 318'11FX BOLTS. CROWN CASTLE L000 'EMBOSSED.' (SPECIFY AT AME OF ORDER) INSTALL ED,p LOAD RATINGS: WITH STUB -UP 12 X 14 CONCRETE W1IJTY BOX W/ COVER (FXRIAED STEEL POLE TEST WELL 1101 W 111 24. X 36. FIBER HOLE OIU02 AH4� of 9TUi>m Btu/ 7. 14AWO. CADLVEID TYPE •or NOLO 1y'B•COPPER GROUNO OD GROUND ROD , —/' I - - ' - •t —� • INCIDENTAL TRAFFIC -PARKING LOT, SIDEWALK CONFORMS A481MC 770• t�USDA/RUS APPROVED DROPEN SHIPPED ASSEMBLED VER SM ILF_SRESISTANT STEEL BOLT STAWLESS COOLTS CAST -IN FLOATING NUT BOX ` FMEGRALORA0 VOLES .44/..". FIBER BPUCE 00X MALL BE LABEL EQUIPMENT ROWNCASTLE COMMAD WTTHU IST VT FOR FI W1T11 UMSTRUT FOR FIBER SPLICE MOUNTING 1 \L / / ~\ Jp., 4444 \ g �� \�'�'�' i�� ` /, �L� 1I�`�I��'•. i`-(i-TR�oeW �. ���� t..l ` -R 1•IIOPE MEP 4• IO7L 1,Sr1'COPPIA CUD ORDUNO ELE T SCH 4 TO ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL 111_44 7 I 110 1—Rx4*L 11 >s' NOTICE SIGNAGE PANEL SCHEDULE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM 9GL1:7419 SCALE MTA PROPOSED METER PEDESTAL 1204, 120240V.70,311, 42.00ouc DRYERS POWER PRODUCT) COA 10M 2P 21,440 3MONO PANEL eil" �yL -M.- BBQ•^.%ars L BUM iWIWE MAIN --442_-_ TIREB00 1$ NOTICE x : l; 01471 AVM 47471-. i"M- WU I MOWM.1 4004 41.1[1 TO 1 E ''•-•..., 440 401.01 710 1 .. • 4o I401•• KM jj, V O D 1(((R 8 Radio frequency Bowe beyond elle POIRI may exceed 1118 FCC general Public exposure WIRE OMIT 4e.I-N Mi. ons70-304. - R 11M -- ORDUIORI)D Ne 440 Y - - 171173E A . [[0 INK .. 404 S`0 UNOERGROUHD TRENCH TO SCE VAULT 0 001I[I011 LOAM LVO{ PANEL'"' j__400 �• 0 .28 MLA ,_,�_> • 144 AAIMT IVT a '140 100.14144407TETT - w•C•11200 2047 1. UNLIT( POURS OF SERVICE MO WORK/MATERIALS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON PRELIMINARY IFORMATIONPROVMEO BY THEUTEITY COMPANIES AAD ARE FOR Be PURPOSES ONLY. 2 COMPACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTLITY COMPANY FOR FINAL AND EXACT WORK ! MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS NO CONSTRUCT TO UTILITY COMPANY ENGINEERING PLANS MO SPECIFICATIONS ONLY CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH MO INSTALL ALL CONDUIT, PULL ROPES. CABLES. RAL BOXES, CONCRETE ENCASEMENT oP 20730117 GF REOLAREOL TRANSFORMER PAD, BARRIERS. POLE RISERS,TRENCIWO. ANY FEES ANO MCEALL BACKFLL PAY ALL VTLIIYCOIPLUD REQUIREMENTS IN SCOPE OF WORK 2 O KEYNOTES: POLS OROIRA R00- © 0 IMO 11aIMNMIe0o4NAFAY "� O'••••ie • i4 • „...44444440,4 � �f 14016.1(06?714 SQUARE D LOAD CENTER 1002.4L70111 W/3 -TANDEM BREWERS 1100T2020 O1 EQUAL 1/SG2112•11120 Los,.0-NEG w'PIRONDTOPOLEwtouloROD a O °ARV 4011.60 4 O ANDREW . O ION NOC TEL 8: 600-788-7811 TP -23 1121 t. ie 1131 114 1 u — TP -23 rT�1LctXi. 142829 W 1( '1 `1Ii.1 NG WEST, INC. TIM WYd1 Art=Ct 444•44a4441.44ase = CCI TFACLWMNICNOM,X OMWLTANIF COASTALCOIWVOCATION{ 111114Eim 111 " O✓,OOH0M Pea 7.7340 0801.1004030. WOW.. 1101 M0 W "ROK COMM V f 71 TNf 1170101000W[BI007NVM1YRUO (00010041141.1071000774 .074147[0[ IMIOR1.20111t1t11110ALIT410113 TO V%lIWl l [ICTCllrnlIlIMI 40044704.7040$121144 01701 TIDIETI l Min TP -23 STEEL TEXTURED STREET UGHT I ANTENNA POLE 73/5 OF RED)AWKAVE 15' CIL OF CALLESTTO VALLARTA CITY OF TEMECUTA. CA ( NOTES ) / ou AGR 12.19.12 Awewn111 TC 50F9 A TP -23 142929 1 /ACROWN wilNG WEST, INC TISSWEf11Ate SDOM L V CA11TH A. '-.5 CC1 TELLAOl1INAMl.TIOSa CONSULTANTS COASTAL CONNNNEATIOM TM Maw Ms Sm 060,111 tfq rwTMT INTOINA110.N TIF ONOANATION CONTAINED SUMS SETT NAMIWA FMOEPMLAMYAM) CO%TOENTIAL TO WIIRO.Y ANY USE OR orsaosote 0801 MAMAS T MATES TO VENISON R9IpCILY 11101NMD 4144 T,.1103 CALL AT MASI TWO OATS MOLL TOMO UNTAAUTOMM2 STATICS ALERT T1rRT• LANs TP -23 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REOHAWKAVE IF CIL OF CALLESTTO VMLMRA CM OF TEMECULA. CA PROFILES IONTMAY AGR 6 OF 9 12.19.12 MORISONTAL ANTENN ANTENNA0•4401, ?Of OPSCINIDEWAAT9Tr tYDT11CASTLE TO M101S*A11DTPOM3 MVT AIN AAO LI/MFYfIEtO 14wSTLM R mato IMO LION /MT LANA POLO 10If4'A NCLPMB. ANTOt*SlOOT-N6lnmairo TT HECTOR TO TM, TOL E i- I CIA CUR BREMER Al TT I ORpWLMtw1 .. rr�ri?+,hGG y I. fGspTdz ii ' } .+ a I . 1 F I? y,, SECTOR 0 TOP Of n.rel.M ?+ AE IOC 2M I L il0 CENTER Al 2T M IALMIMS: 1 111E Y T -••IYA.ISr1. \ • Y'iOIIOINO9@ECOOL r,Lq��r<31\\\b�r�f 1 I AT A 1 MAKE READY STEEL TEXTURED STREET LKiHT INOEfNA POLE NEW CONSTRUCTION CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL NEW ST TEXTURED STEEL POLE CROYM CASTLE TO MATCH SURROUNONO MAST MAI AND LULINARE TO NEW STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIC11T I/NRUTLA POLE INSTALL CIRCUIT BREAKER AT T 0'. INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON THC S O'CLOCK ANO 9 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 1 T r. NSTALL(2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS CN THE 9OCEOCK ANO 9OCLOCK POSITION AT KT. INSTALL (3)24'AAIPHENOI PANEL ANTENNAS 0696.09 6/1719.2170 ATO'I 110'/UV AMOUllt4 WI VEARAO CENTER OF2T r. INSTALL (1)KATHEN TAIL SECTOR ANTENNA M00.10110 ON TOP OF POLE INSTALL (WA' A 3r MIER SPLICE BOX MSTILLL LiORNSDTESTwait INSTALL M GROUND RCD9. INSTALL (I) METER PEDESTAL. NOTES: TOTAL STRUCTURE 11OOHT: 9Pr ANTENNATYPE (1)KATNEIN TR, SECTORTr (3)AMPHMOL PANEL 23 i X US' XZT r 1120.1140' ... b, .•o` A f 12 O'CLOCK VIEW k'ALF.I+'-I. B 1 ANTENNA DETAILS I TP -23 142929 1 /ACROWN wilNG WEST, INC TISSWEf11Ate SDOM L V CA11TH A. '-.5 CC1 TELLAOl1INAMl.TIOSa CONSULTANTS COASTAL CONNNNEATIOM TM Maw Ms Sm 060,111 tfq rwTMT INTOINA110.N TIF ONOANATION CONTAINED SUMS SETT NAMIWA FMOEPMLAMYAM) CO%TOENTIAL TO WIIRO.Y ANY USE OR orsaosote 0801 MAMAS T MATES TO VENISON R9IpCILY 11101NMD 4144 T,.1103 CALL AT MASI TWO OATS MOLL TOMO UNTAAUTOMM2 STATICS ALERT T1rRT• LANs TP -23 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REOHAWKAVE IF CIL OF CALLESTTO VMLMRA CM OF TEMECULA. CA PROFILES IONTMAY AGR 6 OF 9 12.19.12 ( PROFILES ) TP -23 142829 CROWN NG WAST, INC. 2113 MYp M•STEW 33 GN1M ...Awwokon 13L3CO4WM'KATIP1 CONSULTAAII COASTAL COIMUMCA0030 00 Mfr A•. SR. 131 0.740)4.011031 (1Cy3H PCH IWIRMTAITLV-MAI-I MK 0003.000303.03.13300.010 3310f OMM,W IIRwMICTAITAW 01.00000ML 703111.0, AMY UCO 0:;. .00Iti131,3u MAUI 4 1.Ao 3/1.2003 CALL AT LaTT TAO OATS MIME w1UO10 1TA1PWWIM0 MAMA 33131 77410/9 tlIRRYJ TP -23 STEEL TENURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE WS OF RE011AW%AVE 1S' CIL OF CALLESTTO VALLMTA CITY OF TEMECULA. CA AGR 12.19.12 ,.I1MWn\ TT 7 OF 9 A -I AMMO, E TO MA,PI 31.101.0.0310031.101.0.03100 carolCOOVACAS ow MEW MK 13X11.70 AM ..w ARMA10LUKVJE t. LOM IAMMAN* KU IIITATMILN MOO 0) 14.3.10161031. PAHCl I. I0yS3I303103l30 III C fm 3CCTOTT [UH 10.00 1 I ' dd SLAVIC[ MCA AT Ir I. I ' . L' „ . I I(PdIOLE At SAO 1 I 1 (l)WAT 1•30.101,0M TOP d SERVICE AREA AT N I• C710TMICA01LEt0 - MA!CMEUUMUCMIo \ WAST ARM ARO LUKWO IO ,cwnta TtxnaosAMn VOIEIINIUE0 011. INIIMM73.101INITIONEL 1,1 19' TEICNRTOMO. IOI! 11 1' MOOEIMAMp'Al TRI OR I 1 I 1 • • •IOP OEIOlEAI3Td t y MIi A (1)KATNPI� 0010370 IWOEEMVICE AMA Ai 37 T• mr uT d ., rA TOP d POLE AT 3rtl.Yj 1:P,y. f,M11 1 /. CROWN CASTLE TO MATCH 311.1301/110•10• MAST 1.031 MO LUYHARE 70 .EWWSTEaTEKFURED3,EET UOMIAMENMPOIE SECTOR e`•'_ {//// Ad MAL I • lAroMTI AEMIWFKMIIlOY110 3T ,LAT11r0E Itl 1030c .01 DREAMER AT i 311.907E J? IEJCTIII®pIEEL FOIE I _... ti ''''-'73'''.\\.#;//<',,,,A1/ WALLA /",. ?„�`,iv?rye;4<C44/04Gd\/190`�hi,i✓ ld TOP 03 NOMI CI rr . AoWW,P,i 3` t, . / lel/ A\„7 /, /;Jfi�Or\ /���S�•ASfi „S".61::>4. ,N;j x..),"\ �,\ ,� ` :. rLuto74 N. \<,` , . <'/W' • ‘,44 r6 /�� ,.�' `� a�•: , u • •••••-• ✓Q ti�) .. - ees,/,'1Wa Mv,>r %l r(/rs's.. A.°`/\,” . .., jK?3\.mmo"/ i �aDEKQ4.'"'"„E le1,;ye' 'iC`"...els'. ' /00 ,,✓ E 1 9O'CLOCK VIEW SCALE -IT-rr D 16O'CLOCK VIEW ( awl.i'•IV' C 13O'CLOCK VIEW I IGLA.Mr. 1'+• TP -23 142829 CROWN NG WAST, INC. 2113 MYp M•STEW 33 GN1M ...Awwokon 13L3CO4WM'KATIP1 CONSULTAAII COASTAL COIMUMCA0030 00 Mfr A•. SR. 131 0.740)4.011031 (1Cy3H PCH IWIRMTAITLV-MAI-I MK 0003.000303.03.13300.010 3310f OMM,W IIRwMICTAITAW 01.00000ML 703111.0, AMY UCO 0:;. .00Iti131,3u MAUI 4 1.Ao 3/1.2003 CALL AT LaTT TAO OATS MIME w1UO10 1TA1PWWIM0 MAMA 33131 77410/9 tlIRRYJ TP -23 STEEL TENURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE WS OF RE011AW%AVE 1S' CIL OF CALLESTTO VALLMTA CITY OF TEMECULA. CA AGR 12.19.12 ,.I1MWn\ TT 7 OF 9 A 10 O'CLOCK VIEW —C-1 12 O'CLOCK VIEW l � TP -23 142829 CROWN (R 11.1 heWSr,INC. TU WA/.A.ST6 W UVWr,GFTO CCI vuMV aLAlIM3 00,1..7 AMS COA1fA1.<M 11.1%.IRM 11111Mi%.tr JVI III OM MN. IRO IETARV IMOU4ATION TitDNO WARON<OATAa®wnU SET a OM W MDS IS 1ROM16TA11Y ANO aNTGenuLTOVERIZON ANY =OR MICIOSM:OTIIR TOMAST MAWS 10 V BIRON n 6R11GRY M0100111D 1I WAFAY HM%$ UM1 `pout • TP.2J STEEL TEXTURED STREET. LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REDRAW AVE 1B CAA OF CALLES TO VALLARTA CnY OF TEMECUTA, CA srrE PHOTOS / a1.,.. AGR 112.19.12 TT 8 OF 9 A NODE COORDINATE L.LTTI000 MOOT LONWNOC-111AAIM APN #962040012 INSTALL FIBER SPLICE BOX (T B.O.C.) STA. 100 * 21 INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (TBOC) STA 100 • 18 SITE LOCATION INSTALL STEEL TEXTURE ANTENNA POLE (7'B.00) STA 100 • 15 INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (r 8.0.0.) STA 100+12 EXISTING WATER HANDHOLE (8'0.0.0.) STA 99+81 EXISTING WATER PEDESTAL (EB.0.C.) STA 99+T8 RED/IAW% PARKWAY STA. 100.00 CALLESTTO VALLARTA STA 100.00 APN #962091019 NORTH SCALE: I"= 20' 1 APN #962190008 +9 INSTALL ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL (7' B.O.C.) STA. 89+20 EXISTING CATV PEDESTAL (r B.O.C.) STA. 99+S4 EXISTING BCE VAULT (7' B.O.C.) STA 99027 INSTALL OIM:R aaICE BOX ENLARGED VIEW INSTALL METER PEDESTAL INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL INSTALL STEEL TEXTURED ANTENNA POLE INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL f�•///�� ✓`li Ate 3 6'swEEP. SCHEDULE 40 CONDUIT INSTALL FIBER SPLICE BOX DETAIL 'A' TP -23 142829 iliCROWN 11 NG WEST, INC. I.vas,unT3o w000somolsos IlmrsonMs CCI STLECOMMUNICATIONS CUAITAEW101M%'AT3MY 1113 NssAv,OceralsA BCDI ING1131 fMf f IIONaI[TAAY 1010901IG1 T E NIOO IATION COSMOS'S MOM TAMOMWMCO I1f0WWJET.VIYAW CQ Ioem.TO r0030ON. OW MIMS OI.O L0P10E OMR T OM AS IT 0CUTU TOO AWN I33T9CRY MOI -ITER VAR0000UVUNfVXl ALTA TKAAT• SINSANAMONe TP -23 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE W8 OFREIHAWK AVE 16' CIL OF CALLESTTO VALLARTA CRY OF TEMECULA. CA SITE PLAN ounnor AGR 12.19.12 lV \ TT 9OF9 A CROWN /, % ( 4 f l3I t NG WEST, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHAD. VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. TP -26 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE N/S OF REDHAWK PKWY 101' C/L OF VIA PUEBLA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA N.T.S. AMC Nit VICINITY MAP J PROJECT DESCRIPTTONL CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL NEW 32TEXTURED STEEL POLE. CROWN CASTLE TO MATCH SURROUNDING MAST ARM AND LUMINARE TO NEWS TEXTURED STEEL POLE INSTALL CIRCUIT BREAKER AT T 0'. INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9 O'CLOCK AND 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 72' 7'. INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 9 O'CLOCK ANO 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 16 7'. INSTALL (3) 24' AMPHENOL PANEL ANTENNAS 9696.89811710-2170 AT 0' / 120.1240' AZIMUTHS WITH A RAD CENTER OF 2T 3'. INSTALL (7) KATHREIN TRI SECTOR ANTENNA 9300.10270 ON TOP OF POLE. INSTALL (7)2e x 36' FIBER SPLICE BOX. INSTALL (2) GROUND TEST WELLS. INSTALL (2) GROUND RODS. INSTALL (1) METER PEDESTAL. PROJECT SUMMARY ISIIF.FS NUMHER: DESCRIPTION TITLESI/0ET NOTES & DETAILS MRS d DETAILS NO100&DETAIIS NOUS &DETAILS 34018S&DETAILS POLE PROFILE POLE PROFILES SITE PHOTOS I0 SITE KAN SHEET INDEX PROJECT MANAGER: CROWN CASTLE 1100 DEXTER AVENUE STE 250 SEATTLE. WA98109 STEVE WEINOARDT (805) 235-1431 STEVEN. W E1N0ARDT(CROWNCASTLE.COM NODE ENGINEER: COASTAL COMMUNICATIONS 3355 MISSION AVE, STE. 234 OCEANSIDE, CA. 92058 (760) 754.9240 EXT. 101 TODDQCOASTALCOMMINC.COM CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CROWN CASTLE 1100 DEXTER AVENUE STE 230 SEATTLE, WA 98109 STEVE PATINO (805) 235-1431 STEPHEN.PATTNO.CONTRACTORQCRO W NCASTLE.COM JAN 1 h 71113 ton') (.6,14 PROJECT TEAM TP -26 .00IAEU SUIJJO t 142829 o.. CROWN NG WEST, INC. )IL. WA'YM.1R0 V Vow. 91/10 CCI TO1[OURRRIKATRINH CO:MTANR COASTAICOMNM1cAlIMS IL11Mk. ANS.>N O 9 1710 (N70 751 1 111011UETARV MTOILWlIO nit INFORMATION GANIAIRFD DIMS SET OP OMNMOS n PROPNETMYAND CWIDENTAL TOvOmON. ANYVSCOR 0050.05U10 OMR IISAN AS n RFLATTS n VER,ZON n RINCRY IIP11E1110 I 1.100.21T.3100 cnuAr 'I. Ir• 1rAST ron You oa LTDtaN W ICA SHn'R3A1OT ZOM1w1. 111.2 MAR A10111.01114•Ilaillil IA.AAA. TP -26 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REOHAWK PKWY 101' OF CA. VIA PUEBLA CITY CF TEMECULA, CA TITLE SHEET S E 08A 12` AN.wIOK� AOR \--i-OF 10 LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION • 3,33f 31.3.3•34.4 Q 3104.4.0 • .1WARL raft Aw • RCNOAvw s .o41Tm.AR1 ABBREVIATIONS • EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: TEMPORARY EROTON,IEOIIENI CONTROL PRIOR TO COMPLETION Of FINAL IMPROV[ LEMS MALL 00 PEOEOILV ED BY TIE CONTRACTOR OR QUALIFIED rum. AS INDICA I LD OFIOW _ I. ALL RLQUIRWLNIS Of THE CITY Of TEMECULA ' LAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL. STORM WATER STANDARDS -MUST DE INCORIOIMIED OTo 111E DFSIUN AND coNSTRUCT oN OT INE PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONS -WINE WEIR TIF EROSION CONTROL RAN ANOVA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN (WPM IFAPILICABLE 1. EOR STORM DRAIN NLElS. PROVIDE GRAVEL OAC LLT DASN IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM OF WEEP AS INDICATED ON DETAILS 1. THE CONTRACTo000 ODALRIED PERSOCI SMALL BE RLSNNSISLE FM 3.1c331A OF SILT AND SILO 00 ADIACLTIT MUMS, ANO STOW DEAN SYSTEM DN. TO C0$010 CTONACTTTTY. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL REMOVE SILT AND DEBRIS AFT. EACH MAOI RAINFALL S EQUIPMENT AND WORKERS FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL RS MA01 AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES WPM INE RAINY SEASON • TKCONEIMCT0E SMALL RUDER Mt RROAd1SOOWREONMOL D MES TO 4ORROC On. TO TNN SATISFACTION OF TNN CITY ENGNLEA OR RESIDENT WOI.NT:EO AFTER MCN RDL3443100001)E5140 RAINFALL R IIILCOM0RAC OR MALL MUM/ A1011R1NALEROYDKIWNENSCOM1101.MEASURES AS MAYBE REQUIRED RV 'TK WIDUNT 1140I1AG Olt 1004E005E. CIRCERLSTA3.'CTS. WMKM M0( ARSE L ALL E0OS0NGEDIM0Nf CONTROL MEASURESIROV0EO PER EHE APPROVED RIPROVEMENT PLAN SHALL BE NCORPORAIUI HEREON. ALL EROSIOWS0OLMENI COMP. POR minim CLNDILIONS Nat 0s DONE. TO TIE SA1IS0ACI1010F TEE RE4 DINT ENOINE. •,ALL VAIDYAELSIW1l1TYE WKS.; WORN OWL 0R 08 NAR AT TWLIRIGETAOI NORMA Q0AY WREN MN IS IMMINENT 10116 CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE EOR WEEKLY MUMS WINE OCTOBER IST 10 APRIL ISM TOR IRO0CT TEAM (CENTRAL CONIMROR, QUALM! 0 PERSON. EROSION COMM MRKQ IMCTORA ANY. fll00'1EFA OF WORK OWNENDEVEIOKA At. INE RISIDFM FNOMF RI To EVAIW Il TIC ADEQUACY OR TIE 1R0510MSFOW FENT CONTROL MEASURES AND OTTER RRAII000NSTR000ON ACINIID.3 STORMDRAIN INLET PROTECTION FLOW 19LE7 Ep(yE OF PAVEMENT SPILLWAY, I -BAG HIGH FLOW SANDBAG 2 -BAGS HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH OPPOSING FLOW DIRECTIONS EDGE OF /PAVEMENT IN,L\LEETT; SLOW SPILLWAY. I -BAB HIGH - FLOW SANDBAG 2 -BAGS HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH SINGLE FLOW DIRECTION NOTES: 1 INTENDED FOR SHORT - TEAM USE 1. USE TOTMIIBIT NON- STORM WATER FLOW, 3, ALLOW FOR PROPER MAINTENANCE AND CLEANUP. t BAGS MUST BE REMOVED AFTER ADJACENT OPERATION IS COMPLETED. S. NOT APPLICABLE N AREAS LIAR HIGH SILTS AND CLAYS WITHOUT FILTER FABRIC NOTES: LO 0000000 TO POTHOLE All UTILITY MOP CS 2 CONTRACTOR TO RACE SNCBA00 ARO.D AMYALL STORM ORAN NUTS TO PREVLM COTAMPMIEO WATER 4 SPOLS RLE WILL RE COVERED MOCEROAKED AM STREET WEL RESWWT AM0.EME0 AS NEEDED 4 CONIRACIOI TO REPMR 0A4A0E0MOM PPROVEMEMB TO IM SATISFACTION OF TE CITY E MMEN 1. CURB MITTEN 1011 PROMCTE0 *MACE SWAM TON IT IRACl010 NCMTVACIIOM Co O6011.4OMUL 0 TE CONTN,CTOR 4Wi REll00E'NE ROADWAY BACK 10 os ORgpOL COMFIOM MTISFAC1ORY To TIE cIIYROSEER NEL1OIK.molar .RTE0TOmoo, 111 41 ,BYE LAMS. PAVEMENT LEGENDS. NOM MO 'RAMC LOOP OFTECTO ) f. SCEWALK MWL OE n000RCOMENI CEO PERCIIY OF 1WECUTA STUMM DRAWNOS 07. O. 0(0.01163W100 e PEDESTRIAN RUN WL Not RPOSTUROEO ROW GROUND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1 5 6 7. 2. • GROUND CLNSTOLC 100 TO REMOLMOEAN ALL DLRW/.NAILS.STAKFS.ORAOMUSED VERTICALSOTT TIM0OLE ALL CONSTRUCTION MAIL BE IN ALTORDONCE WIIN MUNICIPAL. CORM. STATE. TDLRAL GOT AN000115 STANDARDS AND 0EOLATONS. CALL URA O HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING AT 7001 D Y 740008 El I. ALLLANDSCAPLMO TO BE RESTORED 1004GNAL CONDITION OR BLTTEA ALL EQUIPMENT TO DE 000010 4EIERNGCABINET REQUIRES SW CLEARANCE AT DOOR OPENING. CAULK CABINET EASE AT PAD. NORMAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: LOCATION ANO D[H 110F UOITElO AND POMO= SIO OI H111LL WJ0I OC PROVIDED 0Y 110 SU0DLVIDFA AND SNOYNON AN, TANt50BMOTED TO LNC DWI O' MIMIC WORKS EOR APPROVAL 0LAMOLS MAY 0E PLRM8E110 IN 1t60Ut.1APU1LK WOBu 0use; OECGBSEKTNO FACILITES CO.W11CM BETWEEN UTILKY OIMPANILS EACI4LKS EKIS7NO AND PR0106WD. MUST EE 0I011001Y RESOLVED BY 111E UTILITY COAWANIFS FOR COMMERCIALSIOEWAIKL LTTE EIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE PLACED WTLRN TIE SIDEWALK 136.6EMNO SALT OICW MAROKMTpAN TOE OAS MAINS MAY OSt1ALIDN0Wt UTUTR6 TVAg1 VATIC! TO APPROVAL OF CITY ENORUER LIN 11004 CALIFORNIA STATE CODE COMPLIANCE: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES: CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (INCLUDING TITLES 24 & 25) 2010 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES WHICH ADOPTS THE 2010 UBC, 2010 UMC, 2010 UPC AND TETE 2010 NEC. BUILDING OFFICIALS & CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA) 2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ANSUEIA-222-F LIFE SAFETY CODE NEPA-101 2010 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 2010 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE 2010 LOCAL BUILDING CODE CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN IMITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. FCC NOTE: THIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR RADIO FREQUENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT OF 1996 AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS AND ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY STATE OR FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES. TP -26 11.%133310 SIL 1:3.3743 142829 LL.. J ijCROWN NG WEST,1NL 4114 WQ9IA..SISCY Elm mows. en hms CCI TILECOMMLSKAT0K5 COASTAL COMM 000IIO34 115313wa 03E Sc 10 Wri*,CI MOM INOI ISN LIC PROPRIETARY INFOOSEATON 1100 NTORMATQ' CO40AT NLD N 710 ST' O DRAWINGS ISN010407 RYAND COATOfN11AL 10 VERT10N ANTI. OR 000.0SUREOTIER TIAN AS It MAILS TOVENEON IS STRICTLY IAO0IK1TD ra3 333.6•4416634 TP -26 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT 7 ANTENNA POLE 4175 OF REDHAWK PKWY 101' OF CIL VIA PUEBLA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA ( NOTES j. AGR WANK RV SEGI 08.0'.12 ~2 OF 10 1 DREW. Tho l0NI" optical distribu- tion system foods Iho industry in flexibility while minimizing the ovoroII deployment cost Andrew SoMica ION M7P/7P EU i1 u LTE Mee° • .n4ti-upewkx Edno,ie,, I.MO •1111 rorioes conhglnaeon pos- sibihees It is used to conjunction with 0 Ronde UMI in 14 ION op►cd dstrb.r Hon Syslom !hit syllam Ironwpork ma- liple LTE dx.nneh s:rwb 0owly 1?OO MHz. ITE). p•aiding o cosleH.clho soEAlon h0. dsobu0ng mpocty hon one of mora bona {boort{ ito totvvis %7P Ell mous. . cw 10.•11 kir. Ionto v.•--• {•111.1.1.1 r. k:3.v1.-.- . .A411-.3014 1 .: ..' ' ION-M7P/7P EU Multi -bond, Multi operator Remote Optical System I• 1 • 3,1 • •• • .1 /'• -• 00;•0.1 rl • low ot_4: 0.1. Wu ar•w...witw7 OCessunsfeepir 11lcV•CAt.ON1 10N-M7P/7P EU - Product Specification ll•ontal to... tocol, Mar. oar.'Mc .11.70 ••••• ••••••y.••, W.•a 111 0/.1.1 Cm•wa. IMAM' .ay..I .•••,11••• 10 I1..•w.. I tr M. .w Wru11.111 Q•1C0,1011413•• 4 ton Co••.' r1.1JC.0 011. •W•• ade 6. IM AAI 111.9111 10Nrt... NT a1. vrNr O. mb" MOP 411.A 01711. 114:11 ,••w a• .0..I 0, 010 s•••••.60.. 0 .fAM•ryllt•wrp, Ih... [IOte•7•: OA.* •o -w •w 1.15.•04..•• 1.1••.10.. 4 IS 700 A.H. SISO/M1MO r.....:1•Y %"V L7:0I 40•011 11{..!11 hrrA.. /0.011 1M.r1 alms co . I.t. «.a. • dF.Y 1 1 4 / NA11:4 O 11 11 M '19 0 11 37 M 000 11 u 31 N 11 U M 11 71 4.4••••••01 .1111.'1.114 SP11101. •••••••••••• 111/. HMr 1.4'1040.0 • 101..011\. Ol ns.$ I1..moc•..1.0•x'•,, .1 Mcowl i ...rna.r•we..A.•. de A0•• •,./ M.E 7 .IM U3T/n•./ 01... .w•r,p•WI n- NOM 1.11•* a I11n.., 0 Awgn•/nd In01. J70M.. S1./rM[w. ..d Control CorrrS, ow'ac 0011 > NII :3111 7yr•m+/••a.pl/r r hl L11'v' ...p,.* .0.4 S4.rhaN..l ••• OU•I•L..M int 1fi 0311100 IRlt1E• w•.1•A I..I: NITS En..am.oMl R.••ur3 •+... I.. .My. 11..10 Mr•..•Aw•w.p+ MM 711 4•,r ISS Miele 1.1,...fiotrrotan, •• 1.5••••11•1 Y.n Iwm/11 w.I:HMr�,� M rye•• m. roved .b..t'rt«AM•1rr• 0!1 •.VCAV];7010 TP -26 110wMo SreELP0IE 142829 VICROWH NG WEST, INC. 31 V,,CA11U0 LA Ate SIC � 1 CCI 11a000MMLLVCAn010 amauLTANrs COASTALCOMMUNICAI4NS 1MSMWo.A.•Me 3M Otoosigata 060IMMO PROMIETARY3T4OPMAT3w II[ I14I00.3M110N CONIAII110 00 TM SET OfmMMAR111COMETAAY AND C@TOANIIAL I0rn100x ANO DISC4011.11E OMR M00AO AN AS ft MUMS IO VEfRO• IS ST0.10LYI0.01110(T® 1 P I W3U0[1 Gnu. I0 fiio 040.0101 1%. 0*4007f,IDIA4 SII•M1 A W I 1xS1I1 • M. Our 161011 TP -20 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT I ANTENNA POLE WS OF REONAWK PKWY 101.0F CA. VIA PUEJIA CITY OF TEMECULA. CA LNOTES ) d 1 SiGI 08.01.12 AGR. 3 OF 10 C 1.1<2714A110N1 ION-M7P/7P EU - Product Specification e 470374/47 Q701xr. W . 04799. ay, eI0 RU RU A 0.4114 MYOV1n0:M1<e3Oa•.03' ' iB 11.401 0119. v.r•Irw4.M (OWN MASTER Wye. RU - RU RU RU RU 1520 t73.01..a. 1.703.1 G13IX 04550 'I.r.01 Il ePM.I 1111 Oral 04443/ MUM 1111 514 2020 04 Mu, 11140 L• 411 011 0103 Pot.. Pl.n..0ION SPM SCA. 3.Fa4) ARDRiw. A CoaimScopc Compaq), awnlewmttp..tan 444 .... ..nl'.J1._.S.w..��er..w.....� W.. .r+..n<....r.•• 14 LITH 13 El r1 SCALA DIVISION 41131!0 a 0(03 10270 In SeC1a I'Senna 47111,00,0141111 03a01014 {I* afa .03 3040,- a a Oen O inch 10a ve 15119 elntiOp't I l.,1 rrcorta0!00 YM 1.10011 4410000100090100y Oe c75rd172..70d V001a 44'0 301300 70... rhe tiro. p.d.emere. 0A .1 /40172.0 0 mal ma...97740.1 AM 1.04110s .1110.0*, 0400 (..1 dm." 04.7 min, I n' Sy 041471.04137.31501147 11s 0'1344.4 t. 7101170 501!1 capaS20M as... 131^11.01 S7..5a.A PCS ,*17500,0 403 *Rada 110441 20 vatOss, 590107* TM 391471. CMMI.MN 01 O'gh .....p. lCWgl11r•,i .gdly «41•.015141 1 4 40110 41a10d .:CQpr 116007 pad 740!0• .1.4197.4 10, ..,-It,4 IMn 14.[0:11.» A9 .n 101 Mr13 Ora no 7..174 .,v1 00 .'1w'e ..313. 3 0.0007 4 31 1213 100 01179.,11104 fp: 0147.ra sp'.'rm. d<Jryxd 1011cp N P; 411 r{pt<a'p•r0 04 3'1<.3ne) 02413149,70319, PUPS a.0 Come317d m a mal 077,751:74 wi vat ena 0117130.500P 1h. 0419740 N. nvunlaw h Pa/ma*.7 Ca.1.0 Pee Otamlapecif.0000na 700700.•1.,1 a 17194110 PDX 701411 4151 11401201• •Aor rl 00441..4A44022t.20.11 '0). 758414 hlwnn:.a .45 1015 .5 7.7.1.000 rah -7004 0.0..01n !144'1 h. .:S6)It'a p)1.-. CCmee4r 952037.10214 NwY. Nb'.4m VCS7100, X0 web lol CO 51470,02 W.¢1 1:1 14174 41 4094 90411.0,0112214 rna 11.04•••• 044,041 91 /101.0111240 Cat ...1404 OP. Pap 23)2:10(091. 54/ 41114100. 3..9' 120114312(03101 113'01001 10,010141 1, 5-10 0r earnta10H 00)2 f.00041 904 13 . 171.05001 12500 t )M. 915.1; 0.041110 6 00,1205r4412. 0.a 01900217 00M5nn W CO. 7074. M0.6.'.6'nwi„ 600 10270 65' Trisector Antenna 41.•0V _.ICO•.•+. 1l5- ...4.115,* 0.14010,10'. 405'.4041002710 0-10 amara •310,01$ 641.e34.0000• 1710.11101021. 1100.1010.414, 14404170l.11 004 172 070 7. 11240 .741 .70 17318 .20 159 37181 .15 1313,85 101.5,Ov. 01 MO.*. 07 ..4.p,*.. an .034•01w1 100 .01 Own .15 M 015' 0040.2)0.0 7 11,41410.0n 0 7 .7410197" 01 1,01C4.e0 ...4,-.4/1,40.4.111 51.<1.74141.4.010 0 .20 a .10 1-13 Ccn1n va1y?0..11134 (mp..04*312 110 MT)4. t.M01r ht3• Mom amrso 07 10 1540 0 .1 .500 17 11 '506 0009 00.0,01,0 V0', 04(.00". 0' 1S49170i<25 13040 501 5400 6 '' .2005 2114 1.1n, .033 v0211 17,911.11 I...Im 4114 .34 ..000 •1909 .1104 20 0011/10.00 9m 4/000 .40 ae ' 0 4W. 70.w7An MJ/d MCM.w.?7-000301403 S4 035/5134.0 I.4493*3,1 o 19111.74'134r350004,14 J<33.4.9. 9.13405 1.x3105.6.a71.a w1a3M MVa01Y.*0041.V'044.0441k 0w N Er0n44•p09/0>n0'NN0P074Aa01rd11.0I 0(4041„ 74114412140/ 141014 en ASO 10.30.30OR 01/11041 1'MV IS1117796500 7..09111119.199. Fa. 3411'-w111.0Ab.16371N 110 (010 1'4701 00400 Peat..... tar TP -26 1rin.l1O%Itel. VOLE 72.007. 142829 OCROWN NG WEST, INC. 11751.01Awe11C9 V Van.C491110 e..aa+eal4te. .4+1'00.103 CCI 1715C01.M1.1tKATN01 CONSO.1M'5 COASTAL C011MI.44CAIIOS5 11515'..*,<S0Jl. 0.s.A1692011 p0411191,0 /00,11111/110/114011.114111” 111116101$141/(0,0144140011011101 551 Or 01411004115IAOr9.01A30 AW CM11wM1A51O V11u0, AW Vico 4AN'101WLL01.0A 0109 AS II 111.0105 130 070101114 *130 7..Y 7540®0131 LA CALL 41 150357739 441,/10016 YW9n 1.0041140401.401344111:00501 `/41441( l 447..073', 01001 0u0A5e1.001.1 [1.er. am. \w NS0 TP -26 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LONT !ANTENNA POLE WS OF REDRAWT< PKWY 101' OF CIL VIA PUEBLA CITY OF TEMECULA. CA ( NOTES ou SEGI 0851.12 001703197\ AGR ~4 OF 10 C KITHREIU1 SCALA DIVISION OIO.r Inh m elion: 01140 100.0210 913= 1AICM. 1230n'm SD 7,:Ms 11255•.+nj • 11 I !tee • 1290 mml W 1n h1400! .11•2( VTS DO1 Ntf 0--10N.Lltw 04.0!.O 800 10270 65° Trisector Antenna 8•11/100 41,04 (cow. lm0.0•J1 M !VW 11111ML NB to ieel to ERROQ•1 A Sh4ul Rot". 11'.141101 SpeSc32en2 toe 41.011014 M woo 11• h.hrvlt.NR 0010 04000,10 , Scats D,o4. Po4100RA9..1510 11.Ao,1 OR 9750. MSA, Phm4154117194500 24. 191,17793$.1 Cm4f t0'wnwW100n.01a..R-n4M W... . al.14.4.0. 444• 696-8001 1710-2170 1 1710-2170 MHz •Ampllonot HTXCWW63111414Fx00 H A' • •14.111 4. T - .I•„ 1A.5I11oa. • 01•.101..0. ..... • •H•4 _lY •11a •••• 2/2,/, • S — 1111•0.1.411C t.. t.....111.1 1.• N.. .••I 114,1 4,40 tan OF.• ^.R•1,11 Y...1101 0/..14 1.•n •m N.. o0.12.-..tleYITIP•. •.4'••911111...•.•N.'Y•.Mw 000114MYl•••ima Y.YM•. ..4f4,01M44fH.R10Mut t'rr 00A1 •n14n•414Iw.•n••4.4••...mu • ••••1 l.R.N...n-.v0.1.•*T•1.A•,nl•. N..✓•..L•. 01••v M..L..-w.r'w• 1 d 2 2.w.aT21'.n21•2nt.rna..coIT .rYl'tl- TP-26 TIARREOS,EEL 00LE enrwfel. 142828 VICRPWIN NG WEST, INC. 7In..1,t A.<S r (. w.•.c.onfo w•.n•w..k tan 1r.nQ•.1R CCI Tf7LO041YPT'ICATEMS CONSIATANTS 00Ai0ALC0000JITCAT10445 Iflf 414•44,.•1•4_111 04140 .F 1740 1900 01* 4.GI111 CTMT 4001(ltA110N I N S.J ORNA110.0 CONTAINLOIN T 11S Stt Of e4AW140SI50R01RIC1MTAN0 CO130ORN11001RR0N U*TUSE00 00(1041/MO111m TlAN AS 0R0 ATES TO •BRITON ITSIt7C1tT IRON011t11 1.1/21,1100 CALL AT LEAST TWO MTS 000RA '00010 iNouvaRO0N0it201Cl'ALER 1100!. 4- aR1N•0 .1W 40/ 40111 Na0 TP -26 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT / ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REOHAWK PKWY 101' OF CIL VIA PUEBLA CITY OF TEMECULA CA NOTES SEGI 108.01.12 AGR -5 OF 10 C ULNOED TOP SOWER SECTION D BARRIER 121.11/IRC 1a 48.00 5.67 IANDLVO AND PAC(ORY CONDUCTORS PFA FLSTAC DWG 3043107716 T EST -0 CO TEYC.B P EURII C DWOiO4 101.7041 D4iYA2C) RESAT COVER PER EDIER. DWG. 3041, nu 4. 1133T.LIYPASS II' PLR EUS17,((1 EAC OW'U 311 I. YI'ASR COVER A241)YP.v9 FACILITIES ttR 11 0 O II 1..f © 'I min 9.50 SIDE VIEW 1 17.00 MIN. METER C.OVFA PFR FASEIC DWV. 30F ACT:ffi 1.1 WREWAY PUU. SECTION AND COVER PER LLMLAC DIVE. 1b 7407E6,7 Ty, 3. A1C UTILITY COVER ARE PADL(X.14A,A31 AM) SEAI.ABIF. I I 5.25 10.50 }--12.00---I FRONT VIEW 43.00 EUSERC 308 NOTE 1 (LESS DOOR) I— 12.00 --- --- 8.00 - -- FOOTPRINT I I 4'25 9.50 I • SPECIFICATIONS • COLOL51 WM1 EUSERC STANDARDS BOAS APPLGImR. • 12OA. AIWA 3E LUHSTRLVTITA • PASL1(:ATED PROM ZINC COATED RESISTANT STEAL • FACTORY WIRIPXI St VO1.2 RATED 0077!01. • IAJNT ORL.N Q)IAM (I APOAM) 1.174I2LLS OIUIIAWISA SPIED • POLYESTER POWDER.CO41EJ1 KNEE ®(®S AST119-1 17 S?EC1ITC.ATIOXI • ALL OITEA)OR. NINIEA ALIDONIIM • ALL W 1BONF96D3 ARA U.1. I/24TW1. COMPONENT DIRECTORY CAT. NU.: LDPA.100.10018 24, 1211240VAI: IPA AW 100AM'4 1 UT(LTIY LAXDMO LL(IS 2POKCMIL 2 METER SOCKET ICDA U 3 SI) I13A POWER IA 31. ALX.]( 6 (I)4.17170A IP ICK 3 r71OD 30A IP IOX SERVICE PEDESTAL S.O. NA—I QTY. NA IPA TP? 762t1141r It, API JOS NAME DJI1631TM USP3A NON-RESIDENTIAL SERVICI3 PEDESTAL, 0 - 200 AMPERES 0 - 600 VOLTS PACIFIC UTILITY PRODUCTS 2436 RAILROAD 417'. CORONA, CA. KM TP -26 11n11.11::1SIEfi11A.:. 142829 CROWN NG WEST, INC. 2I2IM*AMS2C woe-i•4•asko ti A.,w1F CCI 164E601646,IICAI443 COPEATAN15 COAR74,0044476C471044 ISSSI fe9S 7M 010E 3534345 PEOPRYTART607344147106 llc F101WAK0N COMARIEO W MS SR Of ORAWINC! ISPAOIIIKIMYMO CMSIOoTAL IO WALTON_ ANY LSE OR OISPOM.RLL O1N DR 1NAN MIT REU76 70 7331524 IS STRICTLY 110.41011a0 LIP \. TP -20 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT I ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REDHAWK PKWY 101' OF CIL vw PUEBLA CITY OF TEMECULA. CA NOTES ) SEGI 08.01.12 AGR 6 OF 10 C TP -26 IIAiL11.151la alt 142829 , OCROWN WEST, INC. 11L4Yr.'i,CZNIp� RR*M.RO# --"41j CCI-�- • TRNbSMMICAM T COMMATAMIS CW.STAL COMR.I4ICAT0N5 111144A.r5t2N Ocom&CAMMS IN011w11M PRONDCTAAY IOFORMATO' 11lE II TOMNATON COHIAMFD M 11115 56104 DM GSISMOMIUARYM1) COSIIUM M1.TO WM=IXi ANY IM:C& 0041.051M¢OIOCR AMA H IMAM CO YAR. IS YIAKILY F¢OIOMNO T ALA CA14AMI T UAW MO DAYSM70x4 YMDM l.NUIRfgOPO RIMIN MUT TI(K0i r lawavnreAr rt4p MII fIAO cmAlm ..5Y A4ru M/ TP -28 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REONAWK PKWY 109 OF CAL VIA PUEBLA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA PROFILES 4...n SEGI 08.01.12 AGR �7 OF 10 MAKE READY ATATCHSuRRLL (D TCllMUWT LE 10th MAST ARM ANO LUMIHARE 10 NEW STEEL TEXTURE() STREET UGHT I NIIENOA MI 411 KATM2E.N ANTENNA 0603.10270 (3124' AMPIIE505 PANEL I' ANTEAS ABO689 010.21T0 NN FRI SECTOR I I TOP OF SERVICE AREA AT 97 1• IC? or AIM rte, :., T E. IpOFI'OLlI1iY7 , (LXIU Qfirk—fraWaRTMt NEW CONSTRUCTION GROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL NEW 32' TEXTURED STEEL POLE CROWN CASTLE TO MATCH SURROUNDING MAST ARM AND LUMINARE 70 NEWS TEXTURED STEEL POLE INSTALL CIRCUIT BREAKER AT T 0'. INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON THE 90'CLOCK AND 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT 171`. INSTALL (2) ION ANDREWS RADIOS ON 711E 9O'CLOCK AND 3 O'CLOCK POSITION AT IC 7'. INSTALL (3)24' AMPIRNOL PANEL ANTENNAS FB90-B9Y171P2170 AT 0.7120`1240' AZMUTNS WITH A RAD CENTER OF 276'. INSTALL(I)KAMPE]NTRI SECTOR ANTENNA 010010270 ON TOP OF POLE INSTALL (1) 24. x 30• MIER SPUCE SOX INSTALL (2)GROUND TEST WELLS. INSTALL (2) GROUND RODS. INSTALL (I) METER PEDESTAL NOTES: 37 TEXTURED STEEL POLE OMNXT BRFAXEII AT r(r ,'Z.0 I 1VA ,.� 'l �\. ma.1&? `•<4 TOP OF TEXTURED STEEL POLE: 370' ANTENNA TYPE: (I) KATIIREIN TRISECTOR 70' (3)AMPHENDL PANEL 23Z X 12.0• X 7.r AZIMUTHS: W 7120' 7240• Jg�yl`.c/L . a!/y{ �i . $- \\ 240'_,_ i .1 1 \`,120' 0 EDGE. NOA NT L- 90' E 1 ANTENNA DETAILS f D 1 9O'CLOCK VIEW I'¢ALA'w•-7r TP -26 IIAiL11.151la alt 142829 , OCROWN WEST, INC. 11L4Yr.'i,CZNIp� RR*M.RO# --"41j CCI-�- • TRNbSMMICAM T COMMATAMIS CW.STAL COMR.I4ICAT0N5 111144A.r5t2N Ocom&CAMMS IN011w11M PRONDCTAAY IOFORMATO' 11lE II TOMNATON COHIAMFD M 11115 56104 DM GSISMOMIUARYM1) COSIIUM M1.TO WM=IXi ANY IM:C& 0041.051M¢OIOCR AMA H IMAM CO YAR. IS YIAKILY F¢OIOMNO T ALA CA14AMI T UAW MO DAYSM70x4 YMDM l.NUIRfgOPO RIMIN MUT TI(K0i r lawavnreAr rt4p MII fIAO cmAlm ..5Y A4ru M/ TP -28 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT /ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REONAWK PKWY 109 OF CAL VIA PUEBLA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA PROFILES 4...n SEGI 08.01.12 AGR �7 OF 10 J� CROWN NG WEST, INC. TITSM'41HA,<SRq w �rn CA9111F ImYtwe CCI R1101.174117WATIUS 00 50LTANT5 COASTALCOwRPACAROAY 111SMA+e<A,<5IC TH OetfilaCa 1NQ17S142N FIg0nfAAVLN111YLTNN TIN OY0111/AI WNCONIA18T0 W 0X15 SST Of 01.27I7402 LSTAOMIETAAY Aso CONROEHMLTO 0EYOUN. 0 011 1152(1.021.111152(1.021.111152(1.021.11 001111IMAN A911II MAO, IO VR.USON 1S SI 2.101.Y 211011161220 1.0712;760.2 CUA] LUST TWO OATS BEFORE YOU PIO 177331ObaTLMTw1NnT MULTI/ TAITAIITWIAT Nlu TP -28 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT I ANTENNA POLE WS OF REDHAWK PKWY 101' OF CIL VIA PUEBLA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA ( PROFILES ) 08.OL12 SEI \ AGR 8 OF 10 C (11 KA1NREIN 180600270 TOP OF SF RUCE AREA AT 3r I' CROV.TI CASTLE TO '` MATCH SURROUNDING MAST ARM A170 LLAMA* TO NEW TEXTURED STREET LIOHTf ANTENNA POLE (31241AMPHENOL PANEL1 ANTENNAS N9BEDM1710T110 ILII 32 TEXTURED STEEL POLE G'E I )e r,..,. .-. _. I 01 SECTOR 1 1 ' TMOE POLE AT 22 [' ,I ' 1 _ :•: 137'. nn G IMOPRApOAT 12C L I,91 -.. .. .. TOP OF AH107 105' (0)XATHREIN ANTENNA ANTENNA 1800-10270 1 1 0A AT '•, I IM or POLE AT 3F lVI • ' c 1 1 RAD GEN., :: TRI SECTOR TOP OP SERVICE AREA AT 31't• CROMN CASTLE TO MATCH SURROUNDNO MAST ARM AND LUMEN* TO NEW STEELTEXIURED STREET LK.YITl ANTENNA POLI. (312*Q ' AMPHENPANEL ANTENNASNn+981Rt021ro i TEXTURE) (I) KARMEN AN N0610270 1 TM OF SEHNCE AREA AT ])'1• i...•t •111;111A Al TI` 1 TOP OFPplAS S77 1 11.1”..T/111,1A1 CROWN CASTLE TO MATCH SURROIIIMN° MAST ARMANDLUMNME10 NEW STEEL TEXRIRE0 STREET MIT FANTENNA POLE TRI SECTOR I Fa: - I • ' 'I3) 24'AMPIIENOL PANEL ANTE 'j ANTE/AVM TOP Cf 1101010 I IG'T' 1 I �' TOP OF RADIO AI 1 12'r I I rR;;;,n•rF, 5L' f C'Ail` y! Y 32 TEXTURE° STEEL POLE 1 ,;RCAIIT BAEu<ER AT FN _ ' \� TOP OF RADIO AT 1G'T' I 1.. - :TOP OF RADIO*? ' 12'r I INTr4!jn� • 1 I Sr STEEL POLE -- ' CRCUR SNEAKER AT F0' - FwceN .' EOX. I <P A �, ��1 Aft ,\\, 7\J L V OROIILOTEITYALL Ctf\\ iii \iZPIERwiPAILMIN \ �/' \� ` . %• / % Ab \!\\ \\♦ \ti ',Otiy�'\\,'\\4\,.\O\K!\\ ♦\\�♦•OLldiN07EfTN'BL /'�y4\A'. ,�'�O , \ g.(94.," / (�s •f�\ \ �'♦\\' \ ' l�FMI,' '1=9tWEil \1\♦ L%? / /\// �% IY `/� 1.�i! ' ne 7,..-01 n/� G T� EPLICEIOOL ♦ ♦ y\' /' //♦ C{\TEOSritLL ♦0 oeRxETULATTDH ii /y /� ♦! \ V \~ , \♦ >o s°X�•�I \\ \�♦ \\'\ \�//¢00 . . \ \ / / / J.aS^' " ♦♦\�/./ \♦i �`L \♦ � fi✓y‘y C 1 6 O'CLOCK VIEW 1 SCAu A+ 1+ A 112 O'CLOCK VIEW ACA T -IA -1+ B 13 O'CLOCK VIEW 1 SCAT. MT -Pr CROWN NG WEST, INC. TITSM'41HA,<SRq w �rn CA9111F ImYtwe CCI R1101.174117WATIUS 00 50LTANT5 COASTALCOwRPACAROAY 111SMA+e<A,<5IC TH OetfilaCa 1NQ17S142N FIg0nfAAVLN111YLTNN TIN OY0111/AI WNCONIA18T0 W 0X15 SST Of 01.27I7402 LSTAOMIETAAY Aso CONROEHMLTO 0EYOUN. 0 011 1152(1.021.111152(1.021.111152(1.021.11 001111IMAN A911II MAO, IO VR.USON 1S SI 2.101.Y 211011161220 1.0712;760.2 CUA] LUST TWO OATS BEFORE YOU PIO 177331ObaTLMTw1NnT MULTI/ TAITAIITWIAT Nlu TP -28 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT I ANTENNA POLE WS OF REDHAWK PKWY 101' OF CIL VIA PUEBLA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA ( PROFILES ) 08.OL12 SEI \ AGR 8 OF 10 C llfr r--) r _ I 7 .�L�� lfttil .. M '� • Fes " Zvi ` J j ,; PROPOSED NUDE LOCATION • ._. • Lei•• . .�¢ _ -- - .. -,' , Y a Nat r- ... rte. .. 1 :. 4,61.4. iiiti / "...0.....- N .• ‘,1 ';',;f \ (may }�J,, - f�M /3 is N •_ • `..1�'' `-'•.ilii. `w-!' SIE` u 1. � A I KEY MAP B 1 1 O'CLOCK VIEW ��• • • 1 111 �1l1 ;+�� .RIU•c> l r• i 1•\ tvitir7 €Fl^ - 1 PiLP; E PROPOSED NODE LOCATION \�• •� , - -1 ' _. ` - • kt'Y:.74,. ,?�7 PROPOSED NODE LOCATION - 999 •y Fir• "=':-.-- ---.. ,_.. . Y'*-_ J' - -- __ C 1 11 O'CLOCK VIEW D J 12 O'CLOCK VIEW TP -26 IE.YIVRW SIM IV:: W.Ay..R. 142829 V1CROWN NG WEST, INC )IS WnRMAb SIE. 1.7vole. CAsl fm • «R rn••••• :Ai; • -CCI 1F1ECO)OLTM111Q s COMULTMnE COAS,ALCOW4NCw0177V 1,351I•ImA,.9•SH Ow.14E.fw ENIW1MriAR PROIMIETARYC40RSIAOOS' TI! Nl OIIMA O0N CONI••! 01N TR4 SETOF OINWMOS K PROFRFETAAYM'O CONFIDENTIAL ID VOWS ANT IREOR InCIASVRI OM. THAN AS N ROAM TO VE10200077 MOM I•d-OED 1 +41(1.11111 `TIC%.71':, n114 • MN LBO AWN n•,I,Wgte•EL•10 R.� sr nova. maw TP -26 STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT I ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REDHAWK PKWY 101' OF CFL VIA PUESLA CITY OF TEMECULA, CA SITE PHOTOS ) SEGI 08.01.12 AGR 9 OF 10 C INSTALL STEEL TEXTURED ANTENNA POLE INSTALL GROUND TEST WEU. INSTALL METER PEDESTAL 48" i em.rn 'v ♦ v 38' SWEEP SCHEDULE 40 CONDUIT INSTALL FIBER SPLICE BOX INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL DETAIL 'A' NORTI I SCALE: 1" = 40' APN #962280041 REDI4AWK PKWY STA APN #962280042 ty ilt.i i'L°It3i'1 101' REDHAWK PKWY STA 99 +02 APN #962143038 6' 11' INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (7 D.O.C.) STA. 100+98 SITE LOCATION PLACE STEEL TEXTURED ANTENNA POLE (7 D.O.C.) STA. 101 + 01 INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (2'180.C.) STA.101 + 04 101 INSTALL FIBER SPLICE BOX (2' B.O.C.) STA. 101 + 07 INSTALL METER PEDESTAL (7' 0.0 C) SEE DETAIL 'A' STA. 101 +33 EXISTING SCE G X 8' TRANSFORMER #P5477346 (7' 8.O.C,) STA 101 +42 EXISTING SCE MANHOLE (7' B.O.C.) STA. 101+48 APN #962141001 TP -26 IE!( IMI STEEL IPI .OM.. 142829 CROWN NG WEST, INC. 11S WAV.Mt STE C9 LA VgatA *MO MIN"* .- CIILE0011f1LO ATRP9 Oq-AUXII LOASTAL COMMI.MCATLO G )TTT Mb's.Aa Sk.T11 OMr41.a91014 MOM 91M IROI RILTMY IMOIDUT10.9 TIR miwMAnon cmfrrn+D IK nns SFI Of ORA,INGS 1s PAM. TARTTTANIf rGN,ININIIAL IO TeUI7l:N ANY ITALIA LfLWS Ae 01ILR IItt+AS n Pf1ATr_t t0 EA170N• IS ST11.0., rk,411orn. 140021,'JNO 4,01.A1 Lust TM/ 14YS SUM MOO U.'OUtO OUND$avlCz ALERT TOMO 1.4.4.1./+0MO1.0401R TP -28 STEEL TEXTURED STREET 110171' /ANTENNA POLE NIS OF REONAWK PKWY 101' OF CIL VIA PUEBLA CRY OF TEMECULA, CA J ( SITE PLAN ) , OMaftf uRUfMh AffM.TOW\ SEGI 08.01.12 AGR 1 10 OF 10 PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA13-0022, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH TEXTURED STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TP -07) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DATE STREET APPROXIMATELY 440 FEET WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF KINGWOOD ROAD Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 7, 2013, Stephen Garcia on behalf of Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA13-0022, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on April 17, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA13-0022 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to match existing street lights already located in the City right-of-way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antenna will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA13-0022, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new textured steel street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right-of-way: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA13-0022, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40 -foot high textured steel street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -07) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Date Street approximately 440 feet west of the center line of Kingwood Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of April, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA13-0022 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -07) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Date Street approximately 440 feet west of the centerline of Kingwood Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: April 17, 2013 Expiration Date: April 17, 2015 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Textured Steel Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right-of-way PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis/Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in - lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right -of -Way Permits PL -13. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -14. The maintenance/facility removal agreement or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -15. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B-4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F-1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right-of-way. The number of active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PW -6. Poles shall include attachment of signs containing contact information of the owner. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit PW -7. The developer shall contact the Public Works Maintenance Superintendent for a pre - construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with Public Works review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval PW -8. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Maintenance Superintendent. PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0233, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH TEXTURED STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TP -20) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF REDHAWK PARKWAY AND EL CHIMISAL ROAD Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 13, 2013, Stephen Garcia on behalf of Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA12-0233, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on April 17, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA12-0233 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to match existing street lights already located in the City right-of-way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antenna will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA12-0233, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new textured steel street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right-of-way: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA12-0233, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40 -foot high textured steel street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -20) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the southeast corner of Redhawk Parkway and El Chimisal Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of April, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA12-0233 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -20) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the southeast corner of Redhawk Parkway and El Chimisal Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: April 17, 2013 Expiration Date: April 17, 2015 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Textured Steel Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right-of-way PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis/Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in - lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right -of -Way Permits PL -13. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -14. The maintenance/facility removal agreement or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -15. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B-4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F-1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right-of-way. The number of active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PW -6. Proposed node pole shall include streetlight arm and luminaire. PW -7. Poles shall include attachment of signs containing contact information of the owner. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit PW -8. The developer shall contact the Public Works Maintenance Superintendent for a pre - construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with Public Works review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval PW -9. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Maintenance Superintendent. PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0234, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH TEXTURED STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TP -21) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF REGINA DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 195 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF VALENTINO WAY Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 13, 2012, Stephen Garcia on behalf of Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA12-0234, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on April 17, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA12-0234 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to match existing street lights already located in the City right-of-way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antenna will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA12-0234, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new textured steel street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right-of-way: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA12-0234, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40 -foot high textured steel street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -21) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Regina Drive approximately 195 feet east of the center line of Valentino Way, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of April, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA12-0234 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -21) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Regina Drive, approximately 195 feet east of the center line of Valentino Way. Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: April 17, 2013 Expiration Date: April 17, 2015 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Textured Steel Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right-of-way PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis/Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in - lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right -of -Way Permits PL -13. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -14. The maintenance/facility removal agreement or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -15. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B-4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F-1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right-of-way. The number of active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PW -6. Proposed node pole shall include streetlight arm and luminaire. PW -7. Poles shall include attachment of signs containing contact information of the owner. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit PW -8. The developer shall contact the Public Works Maintenance Superintendent for a pre - construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with Public Works review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval PW -9. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Maintenance Superintendent. PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0235, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH STEEL TEXTURED STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TP -23) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF REDHAWK PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 15 FEET WEST OF THE CENTER LINE OF CALLESITO VALLARTA Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 13, 2012, Stephen Garcia on behalf of Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA12-0235, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on April 17, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA12-0235 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to match existing street lights already located in the City right-of-way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antenna will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA12-0235, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new textured steel street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right-of-way: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA12-0235, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40 -foot high textured steel street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -23) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Redhawk Parkway approximately 15 feet west of the center line of Callesito Vallarta, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of April, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA12-0235 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high steel textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -23) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Redhawk Parkway, approximately 15 feet west of the center line of Callesito Vallarta. Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: April 17, 2013 Expiration Date: April 17, 2015 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Textured Steel Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right-of-way PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis/Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in - lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right -of -Way Permits PL -13. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -14. The maintenance/facility removal agreement or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -15. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B-4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F-1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right-of-way. The number of active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PW -6. Proposed node pole shall include streetlight arm and luminaire. PW -7. Poles shall include attachment of signs containing contact information of the owner. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit PW -8. The developer shall contact the Public Works Maintenance Superintendent for a pre - construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with Public Works review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval PW -9. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Maintenance Superintendent. PC RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0237, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40 - FOOT HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TP -26) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF REDHAWK PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 101 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF VIA PUEBLA Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 13, 2012, Stephen Garcia on behalf of Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA12-0237, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on April 17, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA12-0237 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to match existing street lights already located in the City right-of-way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antenna will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA12-0237, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new textured steel street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right-of-way: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA12-0237, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new 40 -foot high textured steel street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -26) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Redhawk Parkway approximately 101 feet east of the center line of Via Puebla, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of April, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA12-0237 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40 -foot high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -26) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Redhawk Parkway, approximately 101 feet east of the center line of Via Puebla. Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: April 17, 2013 Expiration Date: April 17, 2015 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Textured Steel Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right-of-way PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis/Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in - lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right -of -Way Permits PL -13. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -14. The maintenance/facility removal agreement or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -15. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B-4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F-1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right-of-way. The number of active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PW -6. Proposed node pole shall include streetlight arm and luminaire. PW -7. Poles shall include attachment of signs containing contact information of the owner. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit PW -8. The developer shall contact the Public Works Maintenance Superintendent for a pre - construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with Public Works review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval PW -9. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Maintenance Superintendent. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: PA13-0022 Stephen Garcia, Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Pian (Node TP -07) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Date Street approximately 440 feet west of the center line of Kingwood Road. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Matt Peters, (951) 694-6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers April 17, 2013 6:00 p.m. k, ot, 11* ., +4* *04 O oaoa , �' ', Project Site �♦ �� �• �� — *: 4. # .# • ckS 'Ili - 44 /\. \ • 4‘.. "4 4:(0/# 0 250 500 1400 F I Feet 490 4.6 The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: PA12-0233 Stephen Garcia, Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -20) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the southeast corner of Redhawk Parkway and El Chimisal Road. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Matt Peters, (951) 694-6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers April 17, 2013 6:00 p.m. Project Site T-�' 04S*N14 44 4 R T �4TF4 ,,ACAQ�RST el V 41 $< IIII1 0 ARD p44Y lig?�• QUO oo�o `Fyo ,oQ �ResrylEK u '44pW S, ,.49 � S �0 250 alp The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.orq. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: PA12-0234 Stephen Garcia, Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -21) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the south side of Regina Drive, approximately 195 feet east of the center line of Valentino Way. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Matt Peters, (951) 694-6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers April 17, 2013 6:00 p.m. The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: PA12-0235 Stephen Garcia, Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high steel textured street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -23) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Redhawk Parkway, approximately 15 feet west of the center line of Callesito Vallarta. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Matt Peters, (951) 694-6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers April 17, 2013 6:00 p.m. The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: PA12-0237 Stephen Garcia, Crown Castle A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TP -26) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Redhawk Parkway, approximately 101 feet east of the center line of Via Puebla. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15303, Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Matt Peters, (951) 694-6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers April 17, 2013 6:00 p.m. Project Site The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400.