Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout080614 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 6, 2014 — 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 14-19 PRELUDE MUSIC: Earlene Bundy CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Guerriero Roll Call: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Business Spotlight Recognition Presentation, PHS/MWA Aviation Services, Christine Damko PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three-minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Action Minutes of July 16, 2014 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Planning Application No. PA14-0053 a Maior Modification application to allow Van Daele Development to revise the previously approved product type and landscape plan for The Vineyards (Walcott Estates) generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos (APNs: 957- 170-032 through 036), James Atkins RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14-0053, A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO ALLOW VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT TO REVISE THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRODUCT TYPE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR WALCOTT ESTATES, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD, EAST OF WALCOTT LANE, NORTH OF LA SERENA WAY AND SOUTH OF CALLE CHAPOS (APNS: 957-170-032 THROUGH 036) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONER SUBCOMMITTEE(S) DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Wednesday, September 3, 2014, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material may be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at the Temecula Civic Center, (951) 694-6400. ITEM 1 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: August 6, 2014 SUBJECT: Business Recognition Program — PHS/MWA Aviation Services PREPARED BY: Christine Damko, Economic Development Analyst BACKGROUND: The mission of PHS/MWA Aviation Services is to be known as a world class provider of aircraft repairs and replacement parts. They accomplish this through creative innovation in engineering of replacement parts and repair practices to give customers a competitive edge by reducing costs. PHS/MWA is currently operating in approximately 100,000 square feet of total space consisting of six industrial machine shops across two buildings on the same campus with approximately 160 employees. This allows PHS/MWA to provide long term service and repair contracts with major airlines worldwide. They have the ability to create custom service programs for theirr clients, enabling quicker turn around, resulting in less downtime and creating higher return on investment. ITEM 2 PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: ABSENT: Staff Attendees: NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JULY 16, 2014 — 6:00 PM Earlene Bundy Commissioner Carey Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio CAREY, KIGHT Villa, Lee, Fisk, Kelly -Lehner, De LaTorre, Atkins Next in Order: Resolution: 14-18 All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.. CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of June 4, 2014 APPROVED 3-0-2-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, HARTER, TELESIO; CAREY, KIGHT ABSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 Planning Application No. PA14-0057. a Conditional Use Permit to allow Temecula Valley Event Center LLC, an indoor venue for public and private gatherings including live indoor entertainment, to operate under a Type 57 ABC License (Special on Sale General) liquor license, located at 27345 Jefferson Avenue. (Plaza Seville Center), James Atkins APPROVED 3-0-2-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO: AYE VOTES FROM COMMIS- SIONERS GUERRIERO, HARTER, TELESIO; CAREY, KIGHT ABSENT RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 14-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION PA14-0057, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE TEMECULA VALLEY EVENT CENTER, A VENUE FOR CONDUCTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE GATHERINGS INCLUDING LIVE INDOOR ENTERTAINMENT, TO OPERATE UNDER A TYPE 57 ABC LICENSE (SPECIAL ON SALE GENERAL) LIQUOR LICENSE, LOCATED AT 27345 JEFFERSON AVENUE (PLAZA SEVILLE CENTER) (APN 909-270-044) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE(S) DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: August 6, 2014, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Stanley Harter Chairman Armando G. Villa, AICP Director of Community Development ITEM 3 STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: August 6, 2014 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: James Atkins, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application No. PA14-0053, a Major Modification SUMMARY: application to allow Van Daele Development to revise the previously approved product type and landscape plan (PA10-0146) for The Vineyards (Walcott Estates), generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations. No further analysis is required. Negative Declaration for the project adopted January 24, 2012. PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Christine Moore General Plan L - Low Density Residential Designation: Zoning Designation: Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on L - Low Density Residential Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant Hillside and Valley North: Large Lot Rural Development with Roripaugh Ranch Just Beyond South: Single -Family Residential at a LM - Low Medium Density East: Single -Family Residential at a VL - Very Low Density West: Single -Family Residential at a VL - Very Low Density G:\PLANNING\2014\PA14-0053 Walcott Estates Vineyard MOD\Planning\Planning Commission\Staff Report.docx 1 BACKGROUND SUMMARY The property entitled The Vineyards (formerly Walcott Estates), received approval for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change to PDO, Tentative Tract Map, and Home Product Review Application on January 24, 2012. The community is comprised of 45 single-family lots on 25 gross acres, resulting in a density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre. The subdivision was designed as a cluster/conservation community in an effort to preserve habitat and a blue line stream. Additionally, the design created community amenities that include trails and 13 acres of preserved, permanent open space. On March 11, 2014, Christine Moore submitted Planning Application PA14-0053, a Major Modification application. The application will allow Van Daele homes to revise the previously approved product type and landscape plan for The Vineyards. The project will still consist of three distinct floor plans;, however the modification seeks to retain the Spanish architectural style, eliminate the Craftsman and Tuscan styles, and add French Cottage, Monterey, and Andalusian, resulting in a total of four distinct styles. The modification also proposes to introduce a grape vine 'vineyard' element into the landscape design. ANALYSIS Architecture The original project proposed 3 two-story floor plans with three distinct architectural styles. The styles included Spanish, Tuscan, and, Craftsman. This modification proposes architectural styles that represent a vineyard character. The Spanish architectural style is retained while Tuscan and Craftsman styles have been replaced with French Cottage, Andalusian, and Monterey styles. Each elevation provides distinct architectural enhancements and articulation. Visual interest is achieved through the use of varied wall planes, projections and recesses to provide shadow and depth. Varying roof forms, floor plans, and changes in colors and materials emphasize the various architectural styles. The proposed plans include well pronounced front entries with the use of arched entries, extended porches, and the use of different materials around the entry. Garage and front doors are distinct and compatible with the architectural style of the home. The proposed roof pitches provide variety in the street scene and they are representative of the architectural style. There are three different combinations of building materials and colors for each of the four architectural styles. The color variation, stucco, stone and brick veneer serve to break up the massing of the two-story units. The applicant has provided specific details which are unique to each proposed architectural style and elevation. Each of the four proposed styles is distinct through the use of materials, with articulation provided on all elevations of the homes. The architectural elements and materials that attempt to achieve this character are defined below for each specific style: • Spanish: Stucco finish, concrete 'S' tile roof, 4:12 roof pitch, clay pipe accents, zero eaves, exposed rafter tails and wood fascia, arched entrances, arched and rectangular multi -pane windows and decorative shutters, decorative Spanish tiles at front porches and entries, decorative iron railings, and decorative foam trim elements. • French Cottage: stucco finish, concrete flat tile roof, 6:12 roof pitch, wood fascia, lap siding and wood corbels under gable ends, significant stone veneer massing, decorative GAPLANNING2014TA14-0053 Walcott Estates Vineyard MOMPlanningTlanning Commission\Staff Report.docx 2 multi -pane windows, wood beams and posts at front porches and entries, decorative shutters. and decorative foam trim elements. Andalusian: stucco finish, concrete 'S' tile roof, 5:12 roof pitch, gable roofs with wood corbels, wood fascia, brick veneer massing, decorative multi -pane windows and shutters, brick trim and headers at front porches and entries, arched entrances, decorative shutters, and decorative foam trim elements. Monterey: smooth stucco finish, concrete flat tile roof, 5:12 roof pitch, exposed rafter tails and wood fascia, brick veneer massing, second -story cantilevered balcony, arched and rectangular multi -pane windows and decorative shutters, brick headers at front porches and entries, decorative iron railings, and decorative foam trim elements. In addition to the varied architectural styles, the proposed product placement provides a varied and visually interesting street scene which has been achieved through creative product placement and alternately reversed floor plans throughout the development. The products have been plotted to avoid repetition in plan and elevation type to meet the intent of the PDO. Elevations that are visible from a public street or an open space area have been designed and conditioned to incorporate architectural enhancements which include pop outs, shutters, decks, and additional roof elements. The lots that require additional enhancements are identified on the plotting plan. A Condition of Approval has been included to require these enhanced lots to be clearly identified on the Precise Grading Plan and Building Plans. Landscaping The original landscape plan featured a typical collection of trees, shrubs and ground cover plant materials. This modification proposes additions of unique plant materials and the addition of key plant sizes and materials in prominent areas to create a specific community character. The landscape methodology and materials that attempt to achieve this character are defined below: Vineyard: Grape vines are proposed at the community entrance at Walcott Lane. It is this unique application of plant material, in combination with the residential architecture, which is intended to establish the 'vineyard' character. The grape vines will be planted on both sides of the community entry drive (Seville Street), with the majority to be located on the south side, adjacent to the community trail. Street trees: Street character for the community is proposed to be unified using two (2) alternating tree species (Southern Live Oak and Yellow Oleander) as opposed to a different species for each street. The central round -a -bout will add a unique species (Strawberry Tree) in the parkway area surrounding the drive. Additionally, the central round -a -bout and cul-de-sacs will attempt to create prominent focal points by utilizing single, large box, multi -trunk trees, as opposed to multiple small box trees. Slopes: The plant pallet for the open space slopes will remain the same; however erosion control for these areas will be elevated through greater densities of plantings and groupings of species. Aside from elevated erosion control measures, these modifications to the landscape plan are intended to unify the overall landscape plan, as well as establish the 'vineyard' character. G:\PLANNING\2014\PA14-0053 Walcott Estates Vineyard MOD\Planning\Planning Commission\Staff Report.docx 3 LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the U -T San Diego on July 24, 2014 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations), following a project's certification of an EIR or the adoption of a negative declaration, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared unless substantial changes have been made, new information of substantial importance regarding the previous EIR or Negative Declaration becomes available, or further discretionary approvals for the project requires one. An Initial Study was originally prepared and distributed for public review on August 8, 2011. As a result of the findings in the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and adopted on January 24, 2012. Therefore the proposed project has been deemed to be exempt from further environmental review. FINDINGS The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. As conditioned, the project will remain consistent with the General Plan with the changes proposed by the Modification. The General Plan has listed the proposed project as a compatible use within Low density residential zoning areas, and the project is in conformance with other Ordinances of the City and State law. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. As conditioned, the project will remain consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In addition, the project was reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part of the original Initial Study process to further ensure the project was designed and appropriately conditioned so that it would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. None of the revisions proposed by the Modification Application are anticipated to have an adverse impact to the original Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Original Initial Study Original Mitigation Monitoring Program Notice of Public Hearing G1PLANNINGQ014TA14-0053 Walcott Estates Vineyard MOD\Planning\Planning Commission\Staff Report.docx 4 AERIAL MAP City of Temecula PA14-0053 250 Soo ■ Feet eon,..is map was made by me GMorleme<vl t Geographic d.C..linfamna.on .-an ilThmapa parwas ma rtpn aero ofTerno lUYeo RrveraEe Cnonq A"n"me oepvlmenr and The Tr.nwonai on.nd Lana Manapemmr All of Flvernae NORTH Col Tl,e Gilt' ar Tein.<W....ume. rq w.R. my M legal Pidson and""in' nrumanm -nanM an hi. mq otl..nd inrarmeoan repreaenmd on Ins map onre<r to update end moM1M.on The Geog'a Inbrmslcn S m and omer aou¢ea MwM he awnea Im In. most mnenunbrmawo That m.p i. not rt' ......l. Geographic Inlo.nwtwn Systeme PLAN REDUCTIONS PLAN ) F. AN I PLAN 1 PLAN J STREET SCENE THE VINEYARD rLnlc m. uLnoP xi. F A F N C H COT TA GF 5FAN15H PLAN I FRONT ELEVATIONS ANDALUSIAN .1 w 11 _ THE VINEYARD ' — 8uwnien lepanl TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA • ' ' u� wu OPT. SL. DR. OPT. STACKING. DR. Mr4woI►IamaINK63il 45.00' FIRST FLOOR PLAN I REFLECTS SPANISH THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA OPT. KITCHEN ISLAND OPT. DECK OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM PLAN I IMM FT TmG Lw0 R 14FDROOFEi 1S4wTNfl LOR FLOOR AREA TABLE 1st noon Fm sp R. 2ND ilogl TOTK 21M N. R. b CM GNUGE IIS �. R. Wl ULIFOIINM RDOif H6 fp. R. n .R. ON al H Baawnian i Lapani sal uni LEFT RIGHT PLAN I SPANISH FRONT A ROOF PLAN A T H E VINEYARD Bassanian Lagoni TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA Sli I)311 la ROOM M1Rs111 -VII. VRM1 REAR - OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM REAR - OF7 DECK - OPTIONS PLAN I SPANISH THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ROOF RAN .—..— A wt ROOF FIANs.... A lf��Y.0O�p1N i;94;'.13 m BFFMIFINn UVW xvra_�—z� nI Inu 45.00' SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN I •,,,,,,,,,,.,, REFLECTS FRENCH COTTAGE THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA PLAN 1 z>w 3050. f,. TmG Zw SO Ff I BEDRO 13.5 Mh SI LOFT BOOR AREA TABLE IIT fLDOR 1.2x950. FT. 3NDfLooR ISIS SO.fi. TOTK 3294 50. R. 2 -CM GIM!.E 415W Ort. CPLiORfNR RDDM Ifs W. as 02 H Bamnian i Lagm ul i3n3 FT. as 02 H Bamnian i Lagm ul i3n3 PLAN I FRENCH COTTAGE THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ROOF PLAN B BassenianLagoni �svi uei�� RIGHT - OPT. DECK pow REAR -OFT. CALIFORNIA ROOM REAR - OPT. DECK OPTIONS PLAN I FRENCH COTTAGE THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA r___________ ___________ r 1 ROOF PLAN.—...w. B ROOF PLAN a OPT. DECK of o� n Buaanian Loom inr ring SECOND FLOOR l� 45.00' PLAN I REFLECTS ANDALUSIAN THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA FIRST FLOOR PLAN Lmw" TmG .Lw S0." � RmRDarrs I s s uTw I Lan FLOOR AREA TABLE IST FLOOR IDS W. FT MD ROOK ISISw FT. TOTK Lmso FT. i. CIJtGMAGF 41IM" OIT CM1f Rw ROOK ISsS " BRnenien ! Leponl ul um ml LEFT PLAN I ANDALUSIAN THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA ROOF PLAN D as 02 is Bnunim leymi niinss ILA ROOM RIGHT -OFT. DECK q REAR -OPT CALIFORNIA ROOM nFillill REAR OPT. DECK OPTIONS PLAN I ANDALUSIAN THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA ROOF PLAN,— D 4 1 1 A W 7 ROOF PLAN •a m D 0". DECK BRssenlan LRpai FRENCH COTTAGE SPANISH MONTEREY PLAN 2 FRONT ELEVATIONS os w ,. THE VINEYARD Bun TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ,tl, _ 4 BB' SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN 2 REF LEC T5 SPANISH THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA OPT. BEDROOM S ) BA 5 & EXP. BED 2 zw sD rt TMG I.WOW FT 4 YDROOMS r s S MTM I SO SA. OIT OED SIOIT YMGIIUiIONI Ort CRAFTS l MY OMK.E FLOOR AREA TABLE IST FLO I.SN w FT }ND FLOOR I.iH SO FT TOTN 2NOSO FT l -M1 GNUf1 $10 SO.R OR (wllFplNi Al 202W iT RaloF >. so FT os 03 IS BneBnun Ligon :xats- i21 uiu OPT. STACKING DR. OPT. SL. DR. NMI OPT. DECK OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM PLAN 2 OPTIONS THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA OPT. KRCNEN ISLAND OPT. HOME MANAGEMENT w Juwnw✓w nqn as of i. Basseman Lagom 7.7'lll fit LEFT tY --------'°" RIGHT PLAN 2 SPANISH THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA FRONT A ROOF PLAN A 05.01 u Bnawnien 1(apnn 5]1 15155 [orm willi1�7, ROOF PLANA ROOF PLAN A 11 RKiHT • OFT. DECK Ev, I]i�.ESiR.:i.i3 OPTIONS PLAN 2 SPANISH THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA 7 LEFT • OFT. DECK .1 .2 1. 9nminn LogoN saii>>i SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN 2 REFLECTS FRENCH COTTAGE THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA OPT. BEDROOM 5 / BA. 5l EXP. BED 1 777F u sq " TMGET. )AOD W R � ffdlOOMi��.f Mll6/ WH61100111 OIf {1E0 fIOI! II�OU\ICN/ CM C1VJR 1 MT GNULE FLOOR AREA TABLE =mff DL ROCU sQ FT slamI-MTLr1Mff fT art GLL/W�N BOO11 =S. O mm M .RFT m os of is Bassaman Lagoni oil m REAR LEFT .sow FRONT B ROOF PLAN B RIGHT PLAN 2 FRENCH COTTAGE as02 n THE VINEYARD BusBnim.layoni TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA ...w`. $ii 11233 ROOF PLAN..-. B ROOF PLAN een elc B OPT. DKK Inaer.�m M E N O ■ E REAR - OPT. DKK OPTIONS PLAN 2 FRENCH COTTAGE THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ROOM LEFT - OPT. DKK 05 02 14 Bannnian 1 lagord s. .. 5 71 11155 SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN 2 REFLECTS MONTEREY THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OPT. BEDROOM S / BATH S / EXP. BEE :Wdal 1YO W. n TARGET 1.W0 W FT. R OEDROOMS i AS OATHS S WWW A0 I OR. OED. S 1 OIT NIRWNATpN o" OUFTS 1-MYG E FLOOR AREA TABLE 1STFLO 11H W.fT. mo ROOK 104 W. ff Toru i Kmlff 3-lAYG f 510W." 0 O RN ROOM 2115Q.FT. o "SQ." 05 02 14 Bassanim i laBDni 7-1 77, —1 mom OEM REAR i7i7mm 1 1 0 RIGHT PLAN 2 MONTEREY THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA ROOF PLAN C 05.02 1. Besaanianilagani spy ni.rom ROOF PLANa.-.m. C ROOF PLAN.o..m Off. DECK +� La""YY�YAfYYY f Fell. } s■lUff I I of t I REAR -OPr. DECK 11.) LEFT - OPT. DECK OPTIONS PLAN 2 MONTEREY os o� is THE VINEYARD Baaanian ia9ai TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ;:;;�•�•p.'Y.� u�isiu ROOF PIAN A w"drniwnaysrn.iu .. ROOF PLAN B PL■ RIGHT - OFT. BEDROOM S MGNT -OPT. BEDROOM S OPTIONS PLAN 2 THE VINEYARD LEMECVLA. CALIFORNIA 7 e ML Basminn i lagmi sL nn� FRENCH COTTAGE SPANISH MONTEREY PLAN 3 FRONT ELEVATIONS as al 1, THE VINEYARD Bnssanian Le WI TEM ECULA, CALIFORNIA 311.13111 SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN 3 REFLECTS SPANISH THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA PLAN 3 3.0" SQ. ET. TARGET'. 3.150 SQ. FT 4 BEDROOMSI IS MTM I BONUS ROOM I OPT. BED S W/ M S / OPT. IMAGINATION I OPT SURE/ OPS. PA RY 3 5.BATG E FLOOR AREA TABLE ISTFLOOR JEWSQ.FT. MO ROOK 1.3195Q. FT. TOTAL 1A395Q. R. 3. MY GARAGE sn W. OPI.G FORNN ROOM mmI FT OPT. MASTER BEDROOM SURE 1 • 1535Q. FT. SWE 153 .FT. 05.03.11 Bassenian i lagoni 331.11333 OPT. DECK ..rnrwawm� OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM -------------------------- OPT. 16080 STACKING DR, OPT. DKK OPT. CAUFORNLA ROOM OPT. PANTRY 2 n W axwnnw..o OPT. IMAGINATION RM. PLAN 3 OPTIONS THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SUITE OPT. MASTER BEDROOM SUITE 2 01 02 14 Bmaninn I Lapmd 5 1. 1233 a REAR --------A- ml---- --- I ---- IN � -------------- I ------- ��----- FRONT A ROOF PUN A PLAN 3 1-4--- SPANISH os os n _ THE VINEYARD 8aasenion i LagoW TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA������������ ROOF PLAN .w -.mn A ROOF PLAN.-. A - OPT. DKK OPTIONS PLAN 3 SPANISH LEFT - OPT. DKK THE VINEYARD Bes1...1 .11.- .«� TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA i%. iW, r..m ni . s xi.unIM) 1C/ 5n I >i WI F_ �I Y1� T 4S.O B' SECOND FLOOR PLAN 3 FIRST FLOOR REFLECTS FRENCH COTTAGE THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA ;e_cr ;an w FT TMG" 3.1"W fT 41FOIIO )UMTMIg ROOl11 WT. m 5 WI M 51 WT M1If.RNTION i O SYIFIO FMTRYl ).MYu FLOOR AREA TABLE I5TR0011 I SO.fT. S ftR 171, TOTAL 5.0T 5O. FT. )•MYGMM'2 57SS R. OR. CALfOItSM ROOM mm FT OR IM5Tn1F®IIOOM SUTF I •1575O.R. 57 soFT. of o5 1R Bnseenien i Logmi i)1 nin �ItiVARA'PYA11WtlSAYRfAfAiRIMIdJIGIWINrtIMA9lC'� ^R/IY#A7liuRYdA'R7r'i1Y�1Yi I v srw v�v�lv�lrV v�vgyvVv7vyv v+_ ry ,,r,j,l 1 .+VI lV+ �IV+ ;r �r ti� A. ;II��I. ■ ■ 11 RIGHT PLAN 3 IL FRENCH COTTAGE _ THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA FRONT 6 ROOF PLAN B psa� 4'S i raa,� OS 02 11 6uaninn Lllgolli fll 13111 ME i D ROOF PLAN•an., e 1 IGHT - OFT. CALIFORNIA ROOM poiloweva "1I GHT - OPT. DECK REAR - OPT. DKK OPTIONS PLAN 3 FRENCH COTTAGE THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA IIIIII�IDIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIC LEFT - OFT. DECK Bassenian Lagm! sti n>>7 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 3 REFLECTS MONTEREY THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA FIRST FLOOR ).0), SO. R. TMGFT 1,1 W fp R ♦ I®ROOITS � � S NTMr pNyi AOOHr OI] IRl S wr N S � Ort R1/GIW.TION I OM fU}EIOrt 1MITRTI L NTGMWE FLOOR AREA TABLE IST ROOF ::7 .SQ.R ]W ROOR 'An Sp. FT. IAH TOTK Sp. L NT GMAIi '75 SO. R. Ort CAW014N ROOM HO Sp_fT. OM ]W]9111OIlOOM SUOE3 •If]Sp. R. • If] FT B83ueRieR Lopmi u i nin N ==._ 'Ile lint Idi�:R it^la 111111 F� ILI® . 111111 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 3 REFLECTS MONTEREY THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA FIRST FLOOR ).0), SO. R. TMGFT 1,1 W fp R ♦ I®ROOITS � � S NTMr pNyi AOOHr OI] IRl S wr N S � Ort R1/GIW.TION I OM fU}EIOrt 1MITRTI L NTGMWE FLOOR AREA TABLE IST ROOF ::7 .SQ.R ]W ROOR 'An Sp. FT. IAH TOTK Sp. L NT GMAIi '75 SO. R. Ort CAW014N ROOM HO Sp_fT. OM ]W]9111OIlOOM SUOE3 •If]Sp. R. • If] FT B83ueRieR Lopmi u i nin REAR LEFT RIGHT I PLAN 3 MONTEREY THE VINEYARD TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA FROM C —11 .aor�w.�w,n.�u.n. C os 01.14 BR nian lagori 1 ------------ R�OOF PLAN^a w m. C nmeraxu t � � 1 RIGHT -OPT CALIFORNIA ROOM REAR - OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM AFAR - OPT. DKK OPTIONS PLAN 3 MONTEREY THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA V LEFT - OPT. DECK I� ew�ninnilspail RIGHT - OPT. DECK REAR - OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM AFAR - OPT. DKK OPTIONS PLAN 3 MONTEREY THE VINEYARD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA V LEFT - OPT. DECK I� ew�ninnilspail PLANTING LEGEND: vaR rr mops wms nrl �e�eoaiM��n�- BnBM 1Mkl Y6JIQLlY[ PRELIMINARY LANDSCP THE VINEYARD - TRACT 36295 CITY OF TEMECULA �p PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14-0053, A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO ALLOW VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT TO REVISE THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRODUCT TYPE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR WALCOTT ESTATES, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD, EAST OF WALCOTT LANE, NORTH OF LA SERENA WAY AND SOUTH OF CALLE CHAPOS (APNS: 957-170-032 THROUGH 036) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 16, 2011, the Planning Commission recommended approval to City Council of Planning Application Nos. PA10-0145, Tentative Tract Map, PA10-0146, Home Product Review, PA10-0147, Zone Change to PDO, and PA10- 0148, General Plan Amendment. B. On January 10, 2012, the City Council approved Planning Application Nos. PA10-0145, Tentative Tract Map, PA10-0146, Home Product Review, PA10-0147, Zone Change to PDO, and PA10-0148, General Plan Amendment. C. On March 11, 2014 the applicant filed Planning Application No. PA14- 0053, a Major Modification Application to PA10-0146, Home Product Review, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. D. The Application was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on August 6, 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. F. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA14-0053 subject to, and based upon, the findings set forth hereunder. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Modifications, Development Code Section 17.05.030.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; As conditioned, the project will remain consistent with the General Plan with the changes proposed by the Modification. The General Plan has listed the proposed project as a compatible use within Low Density Residential zoning areas, and the project is in conformance with other Ordinances of the City and State law. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; As conditioned, the project will remain consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In addition, the project was reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part of the original Initial Study process to further ensure the project was designed and appropriately conditioned so that it would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. None of the revisions proposed by the Modification Application are anticipated to have an adverse impact to the original Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Modification Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations), following a project's certification of an EIR or the adoption of a negative declaration, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared unless substantial changes have been made, new information of substantial importance regarding the previous EIR or Negative Declaration becomes available, or further discretionary approvals for the project requires one. Therefore the proposed project has been deemed to be exempt from further environmental review; An Initial Study was originally prepared for the project which was distributed and made available for public review on August 8, 2011. As a result of the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and adopted on January 24, 2012. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA14-0053, A Modification application to allow Van Daele Development to revise the previously approved product type and landscape plan for Walcott Estates, generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos (APN: 957-170-032 through 036) subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 6`h day of August, 2014. Stanley Harter, Chairman ATTEST: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 14- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of August, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: /1 umkNiziA1iI►IiarevieumIIiI&*mreikNmmi ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA14-0053 Project Description: Planning Application No. PA14-0053, a Major Modification application to allow Van Daele Development to revise the previously approved product type and landscape plan (PA10- 0146) for The Vineyards (Walcott Estates), generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements 957-170-032, -033, -034, -035, and -036 Single -Family Residential (less than 8 du/ac) Residential - Detached Single -Family Residential Single -Family with Attached Garage August 6, 2014 August 6, 2016 PL -1. Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -2. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions,to the approval of this project. PL -3. Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By "use" is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. PL -4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -5. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. PL -6. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -7. Photographic Prints. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL -8. Statement of Operations. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated March 10, 2014, on file with the Planning Division, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -9. Class I Multi -Use Trails. Class I multi -use trails shall be provided as per the City of Temecula's Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. The construction plans for the Class 1 trails shall be included on the perimeter landscape plans and constructed in concurrence with the installation of the landscaping. PL -10. Compliance. This application must comply with the Conditions of Approval for PA10-0146, unless otherwise modified by this approval. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -11. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -12. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. PL -13. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, 'The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -14. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -15. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL -16. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, 'Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. PL -17. Irrigation. The landscape plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for (private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas). PL -18. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for pedestrian trails within private common areas. PL -19. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit. PL -20. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL -21. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. PL -22. Private Common Area Landscaping. Private common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of the certificate occupancy permit. PL -23. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. PL -24. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL -25. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Conditions B-1. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. B-2. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2013 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2013 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2013 California Energy Codes, 2013 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. Green Measures. The applicant shall provide 10% voluntary green measures on the project, as stipulated by the 2013 California Green Building Standards. B-4. Disabled Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. All ground floor units to be adaptable. b. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. c. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as club house, trash enclosure, tot lots and picnic areas. B-5. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of- way. B-6. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. B-7. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B-8. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B-9. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B-10. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. B-11. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits B-12. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. B-13. Trail Accessibility. The community trail must be designed for ADA accessibility per CBC 11 B-256/7 trails and paths. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Minimum Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,000 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 2 -hour duration (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance). F-2. Minimum Fire Hydrant Distance. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on-site and offsite 6" x 4" x 2-2 '/z" outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F-3. Maximum Cul -De -Sac Length. Maximum cul-de-sac- length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 45 feet (CFC Chapter 5 along with Temecula City Ordinance). F-4. All -Weather Access. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance). F-5. Access Roads. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet unobstructed and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance). F-6. Minimum Access Width at Gated Entries. Where there is a gated entry with . median, the minimum required access width on each side of the median is 16 -feet. F-7. Minimum Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, one point of access will be for emergency vehicles only and will have a Knox rapid entry system. Roads shall be via all-weather surface, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. All gates shall have a Knox rapid entry system (CFC Chapter 5). F-8. Dead End Streets. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-9. Water System Plans. The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14 and Chapter 5). F-10. Residential Automatic Fire Sprinkler System. The homes will be required to be equipped with a residential automatic fire sprinkler system per the California Residential Code, Chapter 3. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-11. Fire Hydrant Locations. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-12. Building Address Numbers. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Single-family residences and multi- family residential units shall have 4 -inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5) F-13. Knox Rapid Entry System. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC Chapter 5) F-14. Fire Lane Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. (CFC Chapter 5) ORIGINAL INITIAL STUDY City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Walcott Estates Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Matt Peters, Associate Planner 951 694-6408 Project Location The project site is located east of Walcott Lane, approximately 1,500 feet north of La Serena and 1,100 feet south of Calle Cha os. Project Sponsor's Name and Address Steve Galvez Walcott Investments, LLC 31938 Temecula Pkwy Suite A369 Temecula, CA 92592 General Plan Designation VL-VerV Low Density Residential Zoning VL -Very Low Density Residential Description of Project Planning Application No. PA10-0145, a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36295) to subdivide 25 acres into 45 single-family cluster lots. Minimum lot size for the residential lots is 4,500 square feet. Approximately 10 acres of the site will be preserved as permanent open space to preserve the existing drainage on-site. Access to the site will be provided from Walcott Lane. The future extension of Butterfield Stage Road will have restricted (gated), emergency access only. (Associated applications: PA10-0146, Home Product Review; PA10-0147, Zone Change for PDO; and PA10.0148, General Plan Amendment for PDO/cluster development). Planning Application No. PA10-0146, a Residential Home Product review for 45 lots to be created with TTM 36295 (PA10-0145) for three floor plans ranging in size from 2,235 to 2,956 square feet with three elevation types each - Craftsman, Spanish and Tuscan. Planning Application No. PA10-0147, a Zoning Map and Text change from Very Low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on the standards of the Low (L) density residential designation with provisions for a cluster development. Planning Application No. PA10-0148, a General Plan Land Use map change from Very Low (VL) density residential to Low (L) density residential. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The subject property is a vacant hillside and valley. Property to the south consists of single family residential development at a LM -Low Medium Density, while properties to the east, west and north are developed at L -Low Density. Slightly farther to the north is the future Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, which will contain up to 2,015 residential units. The subject property is in an area that transitions between high and low density residential developments. Other public agencies whose approval None is required Vicinity Map PA104145 t J �r! //'- .:\0 500 LODU 2,000 'l `•,r�\�7r 2 i City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT: Walcott Estates (Planning Application Nos. PA10-0145, PA10-0146, PA10- 0147 and PA10-0148 APPLICANT: Steve Galvez, Walcott Investments, LLC LOCATION: Located east of Walcott Lane, approximately 1,500 feet north of La Serena and 1,100 feet south of Calle Chapos in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside DESCRIPTION: A Tentative Tract Map (No. 36295) to subdivide 25 acres into 45 single-family cluster lots, a Residential Home Product Review for 45 lots, a Zoning Map and text change from Very Low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO), and a General Plan Land Use map change from Very Low (VL) density residential to Low (L) density residential The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the Planning Commission intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the project design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program which will be included as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The Comment Period for this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is August 8, 2011 to September 7, 2011. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033. City Hall is located at 41000 Main Street. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through: ®The Local Newspaper ®Posting the Site ®Notice to Adjacent Property Owners If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact Matt Peters, AICP at (9,511) 694-6408. Prepared by: Nl 8 ! I / I f — A4 5oc kfc At" A'4,— (Sign tune) (Title) 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Signifkanl No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: 1.a. No Impact: There are no designated scenic vistas affected by the project. The Community Design Element of the City of Temecula's General Plan identifies important scenic viewsheds to ensure that all new public and private development projects will not obstruct the public views of scenic resources. According to the General Plan exhibit on page CD -5, the subject property has not been identified as a scenic vista or viewshed. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. 1.b. No Impact: The project site is not located on a scenic highway. The project site is a vacant hillside and valley, however no trees, rock outcroppings or historic buildings will be affected by the proposed project. As addressed above in Section 1.a. and according to the General Plan, the project site contains no scenic vistas or viewsheds. No impact is anticipated and no mitigation measures are required. 1.c. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is located on a vacant hillside and valley between Walcott Lane (2 -lane local) to the west and a future extension of Butterfield Stage Road (four -lane divided major arterial) to the east. Existing residential development is located immediately the south of the property and future Roripaugh Ranch is farther to the north. Roripaugh Ranch will eventually contain up to 2,015 residential units. The project is part of a developing valley and provides a transition between existing and future residential developments by clustering development on approximately 15 acres and preserving approximately 10 acres of open space. The open space will be adjacent to the existing residential to the south providing an adequate buffer between the existing and proposed development. The project will contain 45 single-family residential units consisting of three different floor plans and three different architectural styles, including Spanish, Tuscan and Craftsman. The homes will contain significant articulation and massing, varied rooflines and architectural specific details and materials. The project also contains significant landscaping, trails, and rural three -rail fencing with stone pilaster details. The project was designed to preserve open space and compliment surrounding residential development. A less than significant impact is anticipated as result of the project. 1.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is currently vacant with no sources of light or glare. Future development on the project site will introduce new generators of light and glare typically associated with residential development. The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance 655). This ordinance requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Lighting issues are addressed during the City's plan review and inspection process. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the project. 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use In assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Less Than Poterialty Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Infannation Sources Significant Mitigation Significant Na Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? X b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? X d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non ores use X e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? X Comments: 2.a.c.d.e. No impact: According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the project site does not contain and will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non-agricultural use. Forest and/or Timberland do not exist on the property or in the surrounding area. Property to the south contains existing single-family dwellings, while the property to the north contains a small amount of grapevines, and farther to the north there is a "pick your own" blueberry farm. However, the property is zoned VL -Very Low Density Residential and was never intended for agricultural or foresting purposes. Therefore, the construction of the project will not have any impacts to these types of farmland or forest resources. 2.b. No Impact: The project site does not have an agricultural zoning designation by the City of Temecula, and the site is not regulated by a Williamson Act contract. Consequently, there are no impacts related to this issue. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceedquantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? I X d Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: 3.a.b. Less Than Significant Impact: According to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study by Entech Consulting Group, "Based on the air quality emissions modeling contained in this report, with the implementation of identified mitigation measures the air emissions associated with this proposed project would be below the applicable thresholds of significance consistent with SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan." The project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact. 3.c. Less Than Significant Impact: According to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study by Entech Consulting Group, "The operational impact analysis is based on cumulative traffic conditions in the project area. As shown in that analysis, the proposed project would not result in violations of the state or federal ambient air quality standards. The proposed project would be consistent with the SCAQMD's AQMP, which is the long range air quality planning document. Thus, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on cumulative regional and local air quality." Furthermore, it is stated, "After a detailed analysis, it has been determined that no significant impacts will be created from the construction and operation of the proposed project, thus no mitigation measures are required." The project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact. 3.d. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: According to the City of Temecula General Plan, as defined in figure AQ -2 of the General Plan, there no known sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, libraries, child care centers, and adult -assisted care facilities) that would be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations in the immediate vicinity. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), however, classifies the surrounding residences as sensitive receptors. The surrounding residences may be exposed to some pollutant concentrations on a short-term basis during construction and grading activities. With the implementation of the mitigation measures identified below, these impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure Air Quality 1: • Water exposed surfaces three times daily but prevent tracking of mud from exiting the construction site or from reaching or entering any type of storm water conveyance system on the site • Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas. • Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. • Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. • Sweep any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. • Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. • Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. • Hydroseed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to remain inactive for than 96 hours after clearing is completed. • Ensure that all cut and fill slopes are permanently protected from erosion. • Require the construction contractor to ensure that all construction equipment is maintained in peak working order. • Limit allowable idling to 10 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment. • Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. • Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. • Wet down or cover dirt haul routed but, prevent tracking of mud from exiting the construction site or from reaching or entering any type of storm water conveyance system on the site. • Sweep access points daily. • Implement erosion controls throughout the construction site 3.e. Less Than Significant Impact: Development of the project will not create any considerably objectionable odors that will affect a substantial number of people in the surrounding community. In considering the scope of the project and the fact that construction activities will occur on a temporary basis, the impact is anticipated to be less than significant. 7 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? X Comments: Approximately 10 acres of the 22 acre (net) site will be permanently preserved as natural open space. No changes or modifications are proposed to the blue line stream or surrounding area. 4.a. -d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project site has the potential to contain fairy shrimp and to affect federally protected wetlands, and has the potential to contain Burrowing Owl and nesting bird habitat. Therefore, the following mitigation measures were included in the, "Biological Resource Assessment, Burrowing Owl Survey, and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Report' prepared by ECORP Consulting: Mitigation Measure Bio 1: Pool features on the site should be inspected for fairy shrimp during the rainy season. If ponds are confirmed to be capable of supporting fairy shrimp, then focused fairy shrimp surveys by a qualified biologist are recommended. Mitigation Measure Bio 2: Pursuant to MSHCP guidelines, a pre -construction survey for burrowing owl within 30 days prior to ground disturbance is required. Mitigation Measure Bio 3: Pay Stephen's Kangaroo Rat fees Mitigation Measure Bio 4: Habitat clearing should avoid the migratory bird breeding season, which typically extends from March 1 to August 15. If construction is to occur during the MBTA breeding season, a nesting bird survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist. 4.e. Less Than Significant Impact: There are no trees or other biological resources that will be impacted or conflict with any policies or ordinances. A less than significant impact is anticipated. 4.f. Less Than Significant Impact: The report prepared by ECORP Consulting included an MSHCP Consistency Analysis. The project has been reviewed and includes mitigation consistent with MSHCP. As a result the project will not conflict with the provisions of the MSHCP and a less than significant impact is anticipated. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Polentlally Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? X c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: 5.a. -d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The City of Temecula General Plan does not identify the subject parcel as a sensitive archeological resource area; however the subject parcel is identified as being in a highly sensitive paleontological area. A cultural resources report on the subject property was provided by the applicant entitled "A Cultural Resources Survey of the Karen Lynn Lane Project, Temecula California" prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates. The report concluded that no cultural or archaeological remains were found within the subject property boundaries, but recommended if any remains were exposed during development, the area should be re-evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. While the likelihood of encountering any cultural resources is low, there is potential, as'with any project involving earth moving activities, to uncover unknown subsurface cultural resources. Therefore, the project will be conditioned that if, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate area while a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations. In addition, mitigation has been provided below: Mitigation Measure CultRes 1: Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground -disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. Mitigation Measure CultRes 2: At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. Mitigation Measure CultRes 3: Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre -grading report with the City (if required) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity observation. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in MM 2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the appropriate Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities in consultation with the project archaeologist. 10 Mitigation Measure CultRes 4: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendants) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in MM 2. Mitigation Measure CultRes 5: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation Measure CultRes 6: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. Mitigation Measure CultRes 7: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the detennination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and/or City Council. 11 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Sgnlfcanl With Less Than Issues and Supporting lnformadon Sources Significant Mitigation significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Comments: 6.a.i.ii.iii.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The subject property is not located on a fault line or fault zone. Soil liquefaction is caused by the loss of soil strength, which is a result of increased pore water pressures related to significant seismic activity. This phenomenon occurs primarily in loose to somewhat dense cohesion -less soils, which are located within a groundwater zone. When seismic shaking occurs a rearrangement of the soil particles take place, putting them into a denser condition, which results in the localized settlement, sand toils and/or Flow failures. The subject property is located in a seismically active area, as is the majority of southern California. The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Building and Safety Department to be constructed to the standards of the Uniform Building and Safety Code (UBSC). As a result, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. 6.a.iv. Less Than Significant Impact: Landslide hazard areas are generally considered to exist when substantial slopes are located on or immediately adjacent to a subject property. There are slopes located on the project site, but none that could potentially create a hazard associated with landslides. The potential for landslides to occur at the site is considered less than significant. 6.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The site may be susceptible to soil erosion during the short-term construction activities. Short-term erosion effects during the construction phase of the project would be prevented through implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is required in accordance with the Countywide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Activities Permit. The SWPPP includes standard construction methods such as sandbags, silt fencing, and temporary detention basins to control on-site and off-site erosion. Therefore, with implementation of an approved SWPPP, impacts resulting from erosion during construction would be less than significant. 6.e. No Impact: The project will not require the use of septic tanks or other wastewater disposal systems. 12 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Signiwnt Whh Less Than Issues and Suppoding Information Sources SIgnlBcant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inoo rated Impact Impact a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Comments: Ta.b. Less Than Significant Impact: An air quality and greenhouse gas study was prepared by Entech Consulting Group for this project. The report concluded that "The majority of GH emissions will result from construction activities. Temporary GH emissions are expected to occur for the duration of the construction of the proposed project. URBEMIS 2007 was utilized and emissions were estimated for each stage of the construction schedule. Draft guidance from both the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the County of San Diego Planning Department recommend amortizing construction estimates over a 30 - year period to account for their contribution to project lifetime greenhouse gas emissions. Based on the amortization over a 30 -year period, construction emissions would be estimated at 399 MT of CO2e per year, which is below the 900 MT threshold suggested by CAPCOA as a screening threshold." As a result, impacts from this project concerning greenhouse gas emissions are considered less than significant. 13 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting trdonnstlon Soumes Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation Ian? X IT Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Comments: 8.a. No Impact: The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use or disposal of hazardous materials. The proposed land use is a residential development, which will not be routinely transporting, using or disposing hazardous materials. 8.b.c. No Impact: The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The proposed project is a residential development and will not emit hazardous materials into the environment. In addition, the project will not require the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances and waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. 8.d. No Impact: The proposed project will not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The California Environmental Protection Agency lists Hazardous Waste Substances Sites. The project site is not on the list, therefore no impact related to hazardous materials posing a significant hazard to the public or environment will occur. 14 8.e.f. No Impact: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan, within two miles of a public airport, or within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The project will not create or result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. No impact is anticipated. 8.g. No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area where it will impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the project. 8.h. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is not adjacent to a wildland area that would be subject to fire hazards. Future development will comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the project. 15 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? X d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? X e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f Require the preparation of a project -specific WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The project is required to comply with all current soil erosion and national pollutant discharge elimination system standards in effect at the time of grading permit issuance. As a condition of approval for this project, the developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) permit from the State Water Quality Resources Control Board. A less than significant impact is anticipated. 9.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or lowering of the local groundwater table level because the project design preserves approximately 10 acres of 16 open space containing the lowest elevations of the property and a blue line stream, which will allow for sufficient groundwater re-charging. A less than significant impact is anticipated. 9.c. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area. The blue line stream that runs through the southern half of the site will remain undisturbed and be preserved as permanent open space. In addition, through the implementation of SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program), erosion and siltation issues will be controlled to a less than significant impact level and this project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site. 9.d.e.f. Less Than Signiflcant Impact: The project would increase runoff as a result of increasing the impervious surface on the project site. The City imposes standard design criteria to detain surface runoff on the property to ensure that the maximum runoff volume from the site is not significantly increased. The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements established by the State of California. However, the project is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) pursuant to the Municipal Separate Storm-Sewer Permit (MS4 Permit) issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). A preliminary plan has been submitted and conceptually accepted and the project will comply with RWQCB standards as designed. Based upon the information presented above, the project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 9.g.h. No Impact: According to the City's General Plan, the project will not involve the placement of residences or structures in a 100-year floodplain hazard area. The project is not within an area identified on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps for flooding. No significant flood hazards are expected to occur from developing the project site as proposed, therefore no impact is anticipated. 9.i. No Impact: The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. The subject property is not located within a dam inundation area per the City's General Plan. No impacts are anticipated. 9.j. No Impact: Due to the project area's distance from the ocean and higher elevation, there is no potential for a tsunami. The project area is not located near a large surface water body, and there is no potential for inundation by seiche or mudflow due to the topography of the site. 17 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Im t Incorporated Impact Impact a Physically divide an established community? X b Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Comments: 10.a. No Impact: The project is located on vacant land that will not divide an established community. 10.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will result in the development of 45 new single- family homes on 22 net acres. The project involves a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO — Planned Development Overlay. The net increase resulting from the zone change from VL — Very Low Density Residential to L — Low Density Residential is 26 units, which is not considered substantial as evidenced by the results of the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for this project, which identified less than significant impacts and no mitigation. The property is already zoned VL and was previously planned for residential development. The proposed project is designed as a cluster development to preserve open space and provide a transition between high and low-density development. The project site contains a dedicated road that is currently dirt (undeveloped) and is used as a "cut -through" by people living east of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road. The project has residential development to the south and major roads on both sides (Walcott Lane to the west and the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road to the east) of the property. Roads and other infrastructure are available to the site and the project will not require major extensions of infrastructure that could induce substantial population growth in the area. A less than significant impact is anticipated as result of this project. 10.c. No Impact: The project is consistent with the MSHCP and will not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan (see discussion under "Biological Resources"). 18 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use Ian? I X Comments: 11.a.b. No Impact: The construction of this project on the proposed site is not anticipated to result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or to the residences of the State. According to the General Plan, the State Division of Mines and Geology has prepared a mineral resources report entitled Mineral Land Classification of the Temescal Valley Area, Riverside County, California, Special Report 165, which evaluated mineral deposits within the Temecula Planning Area. According to the State Geologist, the Temecula Planning Area was classed as a Mineral Resources Zone -3a (MRZ-3a), which determined that the area contains sedimentary deposits which have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate, however these areas are not considered to contain mineral resources of significant economic value. The proposed project is not located in an area that is known to contain mineral resources. No impacts are anticipated as result of this project. 19 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels? X c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without theproject? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Comments: 12.a. -f. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project is anticipated to have construction, operational, and traffic noise impacts that could expose people to noise, groundbome vibration, and temporary periodic increase in ambient noise levels. To mitigate these potential impacts the following is required as identified in the Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates: Mitigation Measure Noise 1(Construction): A. The construction equipment staging and storage areas should be located as far from the residential uses as possible. B. All construction equipment should be properly maintained with operating mufflers and air intake silencers as effective as those installed by the original manufacturer. C. All construction activities should only take place between 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No construction should take place on Sundays or nationally recognized holidays. D. The contractor shall be restricted from playing loud music in the open construction area. E. For the duration of construction activities, the construction manager shall serve as the contact person should noise levels become disruptive to local residents. A sign should be posted at the project site with the contact phone number. Residents living within 1,000 feet from the existing property line should be provided with a construction schedule. A timely notification should accompany any major changes to this schedule. 20 G. Additional noise attenuation methods should be utilized to reduce noise levels as much as possible. These methods include, but are not limited to, the use of sound blankets and the construction of temporary sound barriers between active construction areas and sensitive receptors. Any such barriers should be constructed as close to the sensitive receptor as possible to achieve the greatest attenuation effect. Mitigation Measure Noise 2 (Operational): A. In order to keep the nearest sensitive receptor from experiencing noise levels in excess of 65 dBA, the proposed lift station must be constructed so that noise levels do not exceed 78 dBA at a distance of 10 feet. Mitigation Measure Noise 3 (Traffic): Buildout traffic volumes will result in noise levels that exceed City standards at the proposed single-family detached dwelling units. The following mitigation will be necessary to reduce exterior and interior noise levels to an acceptable range. A. Exterior - A noise barrier shall be built along the eastern edge of the property along Butterfield Stage Road consistent with Figure 6 of the Kunzman Associates "Noise Impact Analysis" dated September, 2010, on file with the City of Temecula Planning Department. B. Interior - All homes should implement mitigation measures to provide mechanical ventilation, double - paned glass, and solid core doors with weather stripping and seals. The homes proposed within 300 feet along Butterfield Stage Road will require further attenuation, which includes stucco or brick exterior siding with half inch thick fiberboard underlayer and interior and exterior walls should be attached by resilient channels or have double walls, and that exterior construction materials have a sound transmission class of 30 or greater. 12.e.f. No Impact: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan, within two miles of a public airport, or within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The project will not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. No impact is anticipated. 21 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Sgnifiwnt With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Signiflcant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: 13.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will result in the development of 45 new single- family homes on 22 net acres. The project involves a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO — Planned Development Overlay. The net increase resulting from the zone change from VL — Very Low Density Residential to L — Low Density Residential is 26 units, which is not considered substantial as evidenced by the results of the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for this project, which identified less than significant impacts and no mitigation. The property is already zoned VL and was previously planned for residential development. The proposed project is designed as a cluster development to preserve open space and provide a transition between high and low-density development. The project site contains a dedicated road that is currently dirt (undeveloped) and is used as a "cut -through' by people living east of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road. The project has residential development to the south and major roads on both sides (Walcott Lane to the west and the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road to the east) of the property. Roads and other infrastructure are available to the site and the project will not require major extensions of infrastructure that could induce substantial population growth in the area. A less than significant impact is anticipated as result of this project. 13.b.c. No Impact: The proposed project site is currently vacant and will not displace housing or people necessitating the need for replacement housing elsewhere. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. FY: 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Policeprotection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Comments: 14.a. Less Than Signiflcant Impact: The proposed project will add a total of 45 single family residences to the community that will have a very minor (less than significant) impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire, police, school, recreation, or other public facilities. Development of this site was previously analyzed and anticipated in the Final Environmental Impact Report that was prepared for the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from L -Low Density to VL -Very Low Density will incrementally increase the need for some public services. However, this increase is considered a very small increment that can be addressed when the project is required to contribute its fair share to public services through the City's Development Impact Fees (DIF). In addition, the project was reviewed and conditioned by the Police and Fire Departments in order to ensure adequate facilities, acceptable service ratios and response times. A significant portion of the project, approximately 10 acres will be preserved as open space, and the remaining developed portion will contain trails that can provide linkages to existing and future development in the area. Therefore, no new public parks will be required. The incremental effect on schools will be reduced through the payment of applicable school fees at the time the project is developed. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 23 15. RECREATION. Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mltigallon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 15.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will have a less than significant impact on the existing recreational opportunities and existing parks since the proposed project will create approximately 10 acres of open space and provide trails that will link the development to Walcott Lane and Butterfield Stage and beyond. In addition, the City owns and maintains 38 parks, and has two recreation centers, an outdoor amphitheater, a gymnasium, two swimming pools, a senior center, the Temecula Museum and Children's Museum. The proposed development may slightly increase the use of the existing parks or other recreational facilities in the area, however the demand will not increase significantly as a result of the project. The proposed project would not directly increase or result in the substantial deterioration of the existing park and recreational facilities. It is anticipated that the proposed project will have a less than significant impact. 15.b. No Impact: The project includes the preservation of approximately 10 acres of open space and the creation of community trails that will link the development to a future multi -use trail along Walcott lane and provide a link to a sidewalk along the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road. In addition, the preservation of open space will ensure that the project will not have an adverse physical effect on the environment. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 24 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Signiflcanl With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact nwrpomted Inniact Im act a Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? X b Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? I X d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses e.., farm equipment)? X e Result in inadequate emergency access? X f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Comments: 16.a.b. Less Than Significant Impact: According to the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by VA Consulting for the project, "The proposed rezoning would result in a net increase of 383 vehicle trips per day, with 30 and 40 net trips respectively, in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resulting traffic from this development has little to no impact on predicted Year 2013 and General Plan Buildout level of service at intersections surrounding the project based on an analysis that combined project peak hour volumes with forecasted volumes." Furthermore, the TIA states, "There are no concerns regarding on-site circulation associated with the proposed project. The project access roadways are appropriately sized and configured for the project volumes and designed in accordance with applicable agency standards. The project access location along Walcott Lane does not satisfy warrants for signalization with either Year 2013 or General Plan Buildout conditions and will operate at LOS B or better with stop -control on the project approach." It is anticipated that the proposed project will have a less than significant impact. 16.c. No Impact: The proposed project will not have an impact on air traffic patterns and will not result in a substantial safety risk. The project is not within with the French Valley Comprehensive Land Use Plan, nor is the project within the vicinity of a private airstrip. No impact is anticipated. 16.d.e.f. No Impact: The proposed project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards. The proposed project provides for adequate ingress and egress from the site. The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed and approved he emergency access only to Butterfield Stage Road, and on-site circulation. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted plans, policies, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian 25 facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 26 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to theprovider's existing commitments? X f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate theproject's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 17.a.b.d e. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not exceed applicable wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project will meet all Regional Water Quality Control Board standards. The Riverside County Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the proposal and indicated that sanitary sewer and potable water are available in this area. The project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact. 17.c. Less Than Significant Impact: It is not anticipated that the project will create a significant amount of storm water runoff to require or result in the expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was prepared and has been conceptually accepted and conditioned for approval by the City's WQMP Engineer. The project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact. 17.f.g. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in the need for new landfill capacity. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 27 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history orprehistory? X b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of robable future projects)? X c the project have environmental effects which will IDoes cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? I X Comments: 18.a. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: As discussed in the sections above, the project would involve the construction and development of 45 new single-family homes on 22 net acres and would not significantly reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history prehistory. According to the Biological Resource Assessment, Burrowing Owl Survey, and MSHCP Consistency Analysis for Walcott Estates report prepared by ECORP Consulting, Inc., the project site supports several areas where water appears to temporarily pond, and these habitat features have a potential to support fairy shrimp. Thus, the report concludes that there is a potential to reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. As such, mitigation is required to conduct surveys during the rainy season. These surveys have since been conducted and documented in a report by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. The report concludes that no suitable on-site conditions for vernal pools were observed and therefore no fairy shrimp, which could reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal community. 18.b. Less Than Significant Impact: No significant cumulative impacts have been identified with the implementation of the proposed project. 18.c. Less Than Significant Impact: No substantial environmental effects that would rause adverse effects on human beings have been identified. 28 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 19.a. The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a referenced source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street in Temecula. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.citvoftemecula.org. 19.b. There were no impacts that were previously addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis. 19.c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. Jurisdictional Delineation for TT32780 in the City of Temecula, Thomas Olsen Associates, Inc. April 2006 5. Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation for Propsed 22 -Acre Residential Development, Walcott Lane, March 2004 6. A Cultural Resources Survey of the Karen Lynn Lane Project in Temecula, Brian F. Smith and Associates, August 2004 7. Traffic Impact Analysis for Walcott Estates, Tentative Tract No. 36295, VA Consulting, Inc., May 2011 8. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study, Walcott Estates Development, Entech Consulting Group, January 2011 9. Noise Impact Analysis, Walcott Estates, Kunzman Associates, September 2010 10. Biological Resource Assessment, Burrowing Owl Survey, and MSHCP Consistency Analysis for Walcott Estates, ECORP Consulting, Inc. February 2011 29 ORIGINAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10-0145, DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WALCOTT ESTATES MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM General Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame / Responsible Monitoring Milestones Monitoring Party AIR QUALITY Short-term cumulative • Water exposed surfaces three times daily but prevent During grading and City of Temecula impacts to air quality tracking of mud from exiting the construction site or from construction activities. Planning and Public due to construction reaching or entering any type of storm water conveyance Works Departments. system on the site • Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas. • Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. • Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. • Sweep any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. • Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. • Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. • Hydroseed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to remain inactive for than 96 hours after clearing is completed. • Ensure that all cut and fill slopes are permanently protected from erosion. • Require the construction contractor to ensure that all construction equipment is maintained in peak working order. • Limit allowable idling to 10 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment. • Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. • Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. • Wet down or cover dirt haul routed but, prevent tracking of mud from exiting the construction site or from reaching or entering any type of storm water conveyance system on the site. • Sweep access points daily. • Implement erosion controls throughout the construction site GAPLANNING\2010\PAI0-0145 Walcott Estatcs TrM\PlanningA CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring Progrann.doc MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM General Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame/ Monitoring Responsible Milestones Monitoring Party BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES It has been determined • Pool features on the site should be inspected for Prior to issuance of grading City of Temecula that the project site has fairy shrimp during the rainy season. If ponds are permits and during grading and Planning and Public the potential to contain confirmed to be capable of supporting fairy construction activities. Works Departments. fairy shrimp, Burrowing shrimp, then focused fairy shrimp surveys by a Owl and the habitats of qualified biologist are recommended. other nesting birds • Pursuant to MSHCP guidelines, a pre - construction survey for burrowing owl within 30 days prior to ground disturbance. • Pay Stephen's Kangaroo Rat fees. • Habitat clearing should avoid the migratory bird breeding season, which typically extends from March 1 to August 15. If construction is to occur during the MBTA breeding season, a nesting bird survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist. GQLANNING2010TA 10-0145 Walcott Estatcs 7TM1PlanningA CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring Progrant.doc MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM General Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame/ Monitoring Responsible Milestones Monitoring Party CULTURAL RESOURCES Potential to impact Mitigation Measure Cu/(Res 1: Prior to beginning project Prior to issuance of grading City of Temecula historic, cultural or construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside permits and during grading Planning and paleontological County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all and construction activities. Public Works resources ground -disturbing activities in an effort to identify any Departments unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. Mitigation Measure CultRes 2: At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. GAPLANNING%20101PA10-0145 Walcott Estatcs T-rMtPlanning\1 CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring ProgremAoc MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM General Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame i Monitoring Responsible Milestones Monitoring Party CULTURAL RESOURCES Potential to impact - Mitigation Measure CuitRes 3: Prior to beginning Prior to issuance of grading City of Temecula historic, cultural or project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a permits and during grading Planning and paleontological pre -grading report with the City (if required) to document and construction activities. Public Works resources the proposed methodology for grading activity observation. Departments Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in MM 2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the appropriate Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities in consultation with the project archaeologist. GAPLANNINGt2010\PA I D-0145 Walcott Estal" 9TIATIanning\I CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring Progmm.doc General Impact CULTURAL Potential to impact historic, cultural or paleontological resources MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure mTaganon measure cwrnes 4: IT numan remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in MM 2. Mitigation Measure Cu/tRes 5: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation Measure CultRes 6: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be feasible. Time Frame / Monitoring Milestones Prior to issuance of grading permits and during grading and construction activities. Monitoring Pmgnm.doc Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM General Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame/ Monitoring Responsible Milestones Monitoring Party CULTURAL RESOURCES Potential to impact Mitigation Measure Cu/tRes 7: If inadvertent discoveries Prior to issuance of grading City of Temecula historic, cultural or of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are permits and during grading Planning and paleontological discovered during grading, the Developer, the project and construction activities. Public Works resources archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance Departments of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and/or City Council GIPLANNING\2010\PA10-0145 Walcott Estates 7TM\Planning\I CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring Pmgtam.doc MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM General Impact Mitigation Measure Time Frame / Monitoring Responsible Milestones Monitoring Party NOISE Potential construction, • The construction equipment staging and storage Prior to issuance of building City of Temecula operational, and traffic areas should be located as far from the residential permits for walls and fences Planning and noise impacts that could uses as possible. and prior to occupancy of Public Works expose people to noise, . All construction equipment should be properly units. Departments. ground borne vibration, maintained with operating mufflers and air intake and temporary periodic silencers as effective as those installed by the increase in ambient original manufacturer. noise levels. . All construction activities should only take place between 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No construction should take place on Sundays or nationally recognized holidays. • The contractor shall be restricted from playing loud music in the open construction area. • For the duration of construction activities, the construction manager shall serve as the contact person should noise levels become disruptive to local residents. A sign should be posted at the project site with the contact phone number. • Residents living within 1,000 feet from the existing property line should be provided with a construction schedule. A timely notification should accompany any major changes to this schedule. • Additional noise attenuation methods should be utilized to reduce noise levels as much as possible. These methods include, but are not limited to, the use of sound blankets and the construction of temporary sound barriers between active construction areas and sensitive receptors. Any such barriers should be constructed as close to the sensitive receptor as possible to achieve the greatest attenuation effect. In order to keep the nearest sensitive receptor from GAPLANNING2010\PA I0-0145 Walcott Esnncs TTM\Planning\I CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring Progrnm.doc experiencing noise levels in excess of 65 dBA, the proposed lift station must be constructed so that noise levels do not exceed 78 dBA at a distance of 10 feet. Exterior - A noise barrier shall be built along the eastern edge of the property along Butterfield Stage Road consistent with Figure 6 of the Kunzman Associates "Noise Impact Analysis" dated September, 2010, on file with the City of Temecula Planning Department. Interior - All homes should implement mitigation measures to provide mechanical ventilation, double -paned glass, and solid core doors with weather stripping and seals. The homes proposed within 300 feet along Butterfield Stage Road will require further attenuation, which includes stucco or brick exterior siding with half inch thick fiberboard underlayer and interior and exterior walls should be attached by resilient channels or have double walls, and that exterior construction materials have a sound transmission class of 30 or QTLANNING12010\PA10-0145 Walcott Estates TTM\Planning\l CEQAVvliligation Monitoring Progrnm.doc NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA14-0053 Applicant: Christine Moore Proposal: A Major Modification to allow Van Daele Development to revise the previously approved product type and landscape plan for The Vineyards (Walcott Estates), generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos (APN: 957-170-032 through 036) Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Case Planner: James Atkins, (951) 240-4206 Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: August 6, 2014 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. I/ • ►� ♦,`WWIir Y _ The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. GAPLANNINGQ014\PA14-0053 Walcott Estates Vineyard MOD\Planning\Planning Commission\PC-NOPH PA14-0053.docx