Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout111815 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 18, 2015 — 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: PUBLIC COMMENTS Commissioner Youmans Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo and Youmans Next in Order: Resolution: 15-29 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three-minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of November 4, 2015 2 Director's Hearing Summary Report 1 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and File Director's Hearing Summary Report PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Community Development Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3 Planning Application No. PA15-0583, a Major Modification Application for the construction of a 12,807 square -foot sanctuary, a 15,460 square -foot, two-story, classroom building, and a 3,006 square -foot administration building located at 29825 Santiago Drive, Scott Cooper RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA15-0583, A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 12,807 SQUARE -FOOT SANCTUARY, A 15,460 SQUARE -FOOT, TWO-STORY CLASSROOM BUILDING, AND A 3,006 SQUARE -FOOT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING LOCATED AT 29825 SANTIAGO DRIVE, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 922- 130-016) 4 Planning Application No. PA15-0937, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -08m1) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the intersection of Asti Way and Messina Street, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA15-0937, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -08M1) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE INTERSECTION OF ASTI WAY AND MESSINA STREET 5 Planning Application Number PA15-0520 & PA15-0521, a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 4,285 square foot car wash generally located on the northwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road at 28111 Jefferson Avenue, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATIONS: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA15-0520, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 4,285 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON AVENUE AND DEL RIO ROAD AT 28111 JEFFERSON AVENUE, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 921-060-006) 5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA15-0521, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 4,285 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON AVENUE AND DEL RIO ROAD AT 28111 JEFFERSON AVENUE, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 921-060-006) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE(S) DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT 3 ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, December 2, 2015, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material may be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the Community Development Department at the Temecula Civic Center, (951) 694-6400. 4 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 4, 2015 — 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 15-26 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Turley-Trejo (6:00 PM) Flag Salute: Vice -Chairman Guerriero Roll Call: Guerriero, Telesio, and Turley-Trejo Absent: Commissioner Youmans Staff Attendees: Watson, Lee, Garcia, Fisk, West, Atkins, Jones and Jacobo PUBLIC COMMENTS None NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of October 21, 2015. APPROVED 3-0-1-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO; AYES VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, TELESIO, AND TURLEY-TREJO; COMMISSIONER YOUMANS ABSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 2 CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 21, 2015 MEETING. Long Range Planning Project No. LR10-0014 consisting of: 1) The Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan; 2) A General Plan Amendment to: (a) amend the Land Use Policy Map, assigning the territory within the Uptown 1 Jefferson Specific Plan with a land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" and specifying that all land uses within the Specific Plan shall comply with the provisions of the Specific Plan; (b) amend the Circulation Element by changing the roadway classification for Jefferson Avenue, north of Winchester Road, from a Principle Arterial to a Major Arterial; and (c) make textural amendments by incorporating reference to the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan in various chapters of the General Plan; 3) A Zoning Map Amendment adding the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan boundaries; 4) A Temecula Municipal Code amendment revising the Adult Business Overlay boundary by removing it from the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Area; and 5) Certification of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Report; Dale West APPROVED 3-0-1-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO; AYES VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, TELESIO, AND TURLEY-TREJO; COMMISSIONER YOUMANS ABSENT RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 15-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE UPTOWN JEFFERSON SPECIFIC PLAN, ADOPT FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPT A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION WITH THE ADOPTION OF THE UPTOWN JEFFERSON SPECIFIC PLAN 2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION 15-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE UPTOWN JEFFERSON SPECIFIC PLAN, AMENDING THE TEMECULA ZONING CODE TO ADD THE UPTOWN JEFFERSON SPECIFIC PLAN TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN ZONES, AMENDING THE TEMECULA ZONING MAP TO REFLECT THE UPTOWN JEFFERSON SPECIFIC PLAN, AND AMENDING THE ADULT BUSINESS OVERLAY ZONE TO ELIMINATE THE UPTOWN JEFFERSON SPECIFIC PLAN AREA" AND A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT, THE LAND USE POLICY MAP, THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT, AND 2 THE COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN IN CONFORMITY WITH THE UPTOWN JEFFERSON SPECIFIC PLAN" 2.3 Recommend that staff prepare a Streetscape Beautification and Marketing Plan for the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan area. Kimberly Boone, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Andrew Laubach, Encinitas resident, addressed the Planning Commission 3 Planning Application Nos. PA15-0763 (Development Plan) and PA15-0764 (Conditional Use Permit) for Hope Lutheran Church to allow for the construction of a 15,000 square foot sanctuary and pre-school on 2.93 acres within the Very Low Residential (VL) zone. The site is located at 29141 Vallejo Avenue, generally located on the east side of Vallejo Avenue, approximately 1,700 feet northwest of La Paz Road (APN 922-170-003), James Atkins CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 16, 2015 MEETING APPROVED 3-0-1-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; AYES VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, TELESIO, AND TURLEY-TREJO; COMMISSIONER YOUMANS ABSENT 4 Planning Application No. PA15-0997, a Major Modification to the Vail Ranch Historic Site for historical consistency to the site plan and exterior elevations of the buildings and an increase of square footage and footprint of the Machine Barn. All uses to remain commercial, retail, and restaurant. The project is located at 32115 Temecula Parkway, Eric Jones APPROVED 3-0-1-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; AYES VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, TELESIO, AND TURLEY-TREJO; COMMISSIONER YOUMANS ABSENT RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 15-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA15-0997, A MAJOR MODIFICATION FOR HISTORICAL CONSISTENCY TO THE SITE PLAN AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS AND AN INCREASE OF SQUARE FOOTAGE AND FOOTPRINT OF THE MACHINE BARN. ALL USES TO REMAIN COMMERCIAL, RETAIL, AND RESTAURANT. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 32115 TEMECULA PARKWAY ( APN 960-010-044) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE(S) DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT 3 ADJOURNMENT — The meeting adjourned at 7:05 PM with a motion made by Commissioner Guerriero and seconded by Chairperson Turley-Trejo. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission will be held on Wednesday, November 18, 2015 at 6:00 PM at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Lanae Turley-Trejo Luke Watson Chairperson Director of Community Development 4 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 22, 2015 1:30 P.M. TEMECULA CITY HALL Great Oak Conference Room 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Director of Community Development on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Director about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Director. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. Item No. 1 Project Number: Project Type: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: Location: Environmental Action: Project Planner: ACTIONS: 1:30 p.m. PA15-1025 Conditional Use Permit Temecula Valero Detail Center Lawrence Kourie A Conditional Use Permit for the operation of an automobile detail center at an existing service station and carwash. Southeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Temecula Parkway at 30535 Temecula Parkway (APN 961-410-018) Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities Scott Cooper APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LUKE WATSON Luke Watson, Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: November 18, 2015 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application No. PA15-0583, a Major Modification SUMMARY: Application for the construction of a 12,807 square -foot sanctuary, a 15,460 square -foot, two-story, classroom building, and a 3,006 square -foot administration building located at 29825 Santiago Drive RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Rick Jaeger General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential (VL) Zoning Designation: Rancho Highlands Specific Plan (SP) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Existing School, Parking Lot, and Mercedes/Pujol Schoolhouse/Very Low Residential (VL) North: Santiago Road and Single -Family Residential / Low Medium Residential (LM) South: Single -Family Residential / Very Low Residential (VL) East: Private Education Facility / Very Low Residential (VL) West: Religious Facility / Very Low Residential (VL) Lot Area: Total Floor Area/Ratio: Existinq/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required 3.66 Acres 2.5 Acres Minimum 32,936 Square Feet of Proposed & Existing / 0.19 0.20 Landscape Area/Coverage: Parking Provided/Required: BACKGROUND SUMMARY 20.32% 20.0% Minimum 214 Parking Spaces 214 Parking Spaces On April 20, 2015, Rick Jaeger submitted Planning Application PA15-0583, a Major Modification for the construction of a 12,807 square -foot sanctuary, a 15,460 square -foot, two-story, classroom building, and a 3,006 square -foot administration building located at 29825 Santiago Drive. A church is a permitted use within the Low Density Residential zone of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan. A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan were approved under PA05-0389 on September 6, 2006 to construct and operate a church and classrooms. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The project is located in Planning Area 19 (Low Density Residential) of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan at 29825 Santiago Road. A church is an allowed use within Planning Area 19. The project site currently contains four modular buildings in which Reliance Church operates administration offices, the Temecula Christian School, and conducts mid -week bible studies. Due to the current lack of facilities at the project site the Sunday church services are currently held off-site at Linfield High School. This modification will allow Reliance Church to conduct all of the operations at a single location. The historic Mercedes/Pujol Schoolhouse will not be moved or modified as part of this project. The project, as proposed, would be developed in four phases: Phase One: Construction of the new 12,807 square -foot sanctuary with 549 seats, landscaping, surface parking and relocation of one modular classroom building to the southeast corner of the property. Phase Two: Remove two of the existing modular buildings and construct a new 5,296 square -foot, two-story, classroom building containing six classrooms. Phase Three: Remove one of the remaining existing modular buildings, add additional parking, increase the seating area of the sanctuary to 642 seats, and construct a new 8,157 square -foot, two-story, classroom building containing eight classrooms. The two classroom buildings would be connected by a second story "bridge". Phase Four: Remove the remaining existing modular building and construct a new 3,006 square -foot, one-story, administration office building. The vehicular access to the project is from Santiago Road via an "entrance only" driveway and exits the property onto Santiago Road via an "exit only" driveway. The project, as a whole, is required to provide 214 parking spaces per Table 17.24.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code. The project proposes 202 parking spaces and qualifies for 12 parking space credits for providing 15 bicycle racks and 14 motorcycle spaces in order to reach the 214 required parking spaces. Additionally, as the project is being constructed in phases, the 183 parking spaces required with the first phase will be provided with the construction of that phase. An additional 31 spaces will be provided when the third phase is constructed. Architecture The architectural design of the Reliance Church sanctuary allows the Mercedes/Pujol schoolhouse to maintain its architectural integrity. By not integrating the existing schoolhouse into the design of the sanctuary, the schoolhouse stands on its own and is not lost within the architectural design of the sanctuary. The sanctuary incorporates reclaimed wood siding (gray barnwood and brown barnwood), standing seam metal roofing, hardie plank lap siding, stucco, and faux windows. The north elevation (view from Santiago Road) would also include a stepped back retaining wall which would be landscaped. The classrooms and administration offices (later phases) are located on the middle and rear portion of the property. These buildings will incorporate reclaimed wood siding, stucco, standing seam roofing, and hardie plank lap siding. Mercedes/Puiol Schoolhouse The Mercedes/Pujol Schoolhouse is a Designated Historic Structure built in approximately 1889. Although the proposed project will not result in changes to the schoolhouse building, the Old Town Specific Plan requires that for historic structures located outside of Old Town Temecula, the Old Town Local Review Board shall utilize the best available information related to the architectural style of the historic structure to maintain the integrity of existing historic architecture, as well as preserve its local historic context. Originally located where the Temecula Valley Museum stands today, the building was moved twice, the last time (in 1986) to 29825 Santiago Road. Although not the first school in the Temecula area, it served as the first school actually built in Old Town. For many years, beginning in 1915, the school house served as the only Protestant church in Temecula. It is now owned by Reliance Church. The project was presented to the Old Town Local Review Board on August 10, 2015. It was determined that the Mercedes/Pujol Schoolhouse's historic architecture and local historic context would be maintained with the development of this project. Landscaping The project, when completed, would provide 20.32% landscaping which exceeds the minimum landscape requirements of the development code. Plant types include western redbud, austrailian willow, coast live oak, yellow daylilly, red yucca, and iceberg rose bush. Additionally the retaining wall located at the front of project will serve as a split level planting wall that will include boston ivy, red trumpet vine, dwarf rosemary, and star jasmine. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the U -T San Diego on November 5, 2015 and mailed to the property owners within a 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects). The project meets all General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations and is located within City limits on a site of no more than five acres. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The site is also surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. The project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. FINDINGS Modification (Code Section 17.05.010F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. A church is an allowable use within the Very Low Density Residential General Plan designation and within the Low Density Residential zone of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan. Therefore the use will be consistent with the General Plan for Temecula as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure conformance with the Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing VICINITY MAP City of Temecula Project Site a 125 250 500 Feet This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County, The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification, The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. PLAN REDUCTIONS 0 x � u0 co w U Z J W 0 4D 0 L _ , I -4 fi —J I. L1 . o; .k 1 ttgFir iO • I -ft4 t ---t ' \1 11 I 1 it 1 ( I i IN 0 12 '' __, tg 1g EV- I 5-1-"---- C--- - IN 11 011 1 .,_., ill PT-rrTrn-rr LL1 Alritim' -0011 - -- 0 LL1 1 1 1 1 t 1 t 1 J1 i 1 _,40-0001,27 7 r 1-1-1-71T171-11 iiC0- 70-10111 ii - .117-;1.1' 111 III 11111 ilf i ___. t 1 - 040 011 *11-N1 kil_Hisi 03 - 10 triiv , Mill Illittl;vit.-, ill 74114 Inimitt till i j r-r-r-rrrn- t-ri I 1.1 I 11 I I T 1 J it-- i I I I I LI 1 1 I *oar 1w F 1.- ii 7117171-71 T-11-1 0-01'w t=EITEartiM . . . -j a 1_ i 1 1 a il= 001111111___ - i .:_ P.- -----ow _cui ... _ - ir---------1 r' 101: 1 l.tg iw fJ 0 L _ Jai <r. - :4 1 3:8 1 0 lJ Z 0 J J 5 tl minima El;MEEMI Ililaini ci aNIT ANIME li COLORS & MATERIALS LEGEND I1911B iii iii a i� ` liliillIOU i ;_i1 8 ( e l iii e i PP is i $ p i IBPof]G1OPIC j ¢ i a 6 $ DIJI©Ifl 4 k' J6 Ill! O! m D U a 0 rc6 0 RELIANCE 1 COLORS & MATERIALS LEGEND 9! o 3 e1 S i i lahilA! ,8 #i i lea 11 1E'a�aY 11,11 1111 mon©GoldauOour3 a z 0 0 RELIANCE L0 w cc - m a W ▪ Z � w z } zW F 7 iOo7 wQFCL 0Oo rM 0, z 1- x J F J N j iTe - • , c0z W J — Z w CO Q CO OO m LLO zzo O 000 o m Z 0 111 Ce 07Q AZCa O 1.11 Q W O 0) J W CLc°)3 or 0 J y 00 WO LL00 i-0Ct JR'm a-9 O 0200 Z o0 no 0po� # 0�og F f!)QQ V 0=a2 o5 EE .ae F X LL 0 0 Lu 2071 CO 00 01- z• o Q wz • z0 Z3>z ie 5 ��z o Q 0u)) CO wW 2Qa 03� LLVre Ja o•OZ ZLL0c 20m l� IMMEMEMMIIMI w m 0 O • F- O 7 WQO 1 , — 0 W N 7OFs F.- CO -/ �LL�)0 c'i 2 2 0 COLO M 0- 0 0 CC 0 RELIANCE 7 JO 5 it ii! A Ci J 0 0 0 0 !IIIiIIIIII o r o iilllllllll' D C2 O Jr 0 RELIANCE 111 LORS 8 MATERIALS LEGEND I 1 1 11, a a 1 S a5 ai fug ,ii!i!t!!!!!!.!'I U' CUP -10 i W 4 w u Z J W is 0 Z 0 0 Z W OH w 0 w a 3 F € ui°bhh d4 i t gT 11. y& E 1 F 7 i i i i ala at ,Il I,10 II IIii'1 1 rr 13111 1°a hopas Rosre z 0 O 0 z 0 z 0 F J ♦ —r COLORS & MATERIALS LEGEND 1 eriP gF 9 � ! 4) 0 z 0 Q z w z N 0. u ()RELIANCE MI li Milli 113381313 3311333!91➢3383 18 9 .1.!!! s fftfff!!!! ff ff � 1 E II r i lit d 0 a: 3 b z t 2 Y Y z 9 5 � a 0 . C RELIANCE i c Ill l{ ra.,M PC DRAFT RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA15-0583, A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 12,807 SQUARE -FOOT SANCTUARY, A 15,460 SQUARE -FOOT, TWO-STORY CLASSROOM BUILDING, AND A 3,006 SQUARE -FOOT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING LOCATED AT 29825 SANTIAGO DRIVE, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 922-130- 016) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 20, 2015, Rick Jaeger filed Planning Application No. PA15-0583 a Major Modification, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on November 18, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA15-0583, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Modification, Development Code Section 17.05.010.F A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; A church is an allowable use within the Very Low Density Residential General Plan designation and within the Low Density Residential zone of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan. Therefore the use will be consistent with the General Plan for Temecula as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure conformance with the Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Major Modification: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects); 1. The project meets all General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations and is located within City limits on a site of no more than five acres. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The site is also surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. The project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA15-0583, a Major Modification Application for the construction of a 12,807 square -foot sanctuary, a 15,460 square -foot, two-story classroom building, and a 3,006 square -foot administration building located at 29825 Santiago Drive, and making a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (APN 922-130-016), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 18th day of November, 2015. ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 15- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of November, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA15-0583 Project Description: A Major Modification for the construction of a 12,807 square -foot sanctuary, a 15,460 square -foot, two-story classroom building, and a 3,006 square -foot administration building located at 29825 Santiago Drive. Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-130-016 MSHCP Category: Commercial DIF Category: N/A (Non -Profit 501c Temecula municipal Code Section 15.06.030.B) TUMF Category: Service Commercial — (Only the sanctuary portion of the project is exempt; House of Worship — Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.08.040.F.9) Quimby Category: N/A (Non Residential Project) Approval Date: November 18, 2015 Expiration Date: November 18, 2017 PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval 1. Filing Notice of Exemption. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. 4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three (3) one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 5. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 2, Rancho Highlands. 6. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 7 Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 8. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 9. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 11. Paint Inspection. The applicant shall paint a three -foot -by -three-foot section of the building for Planning Division inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 12. Photographic Prints. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 13. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Reclaimed Wood Siding Gutter & Downspout Exterior trim & Doors Window Frames Steel Awning Standing Seam Roofing Stucco CMU Split Face Block Reclaimed Wood Siding Hardie Plank 8" Lap Siding Rough Cut Shutters Window Wood Beams and Trim Color Antique Brown DE6376 Looking Glass w/ Rusty Weathered Finish DE6376 Looking Glass AB -4 Medium Bronze Anodized DE6376 Looking Glass w/ Rusty Weathered Finish Western States - Vintage Glidden#A1749 Light Chocolat Brown Naturally Weathered Gray DE6376 Looking Glass DE6350 Dark Engine AB -4 Medium Bronze Anodized DE6063 Black Walnut 14. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 15. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 16. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 17. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. 18 Phased Construction. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. 19. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 20. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public Art Ordinance as defined in Section 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 21. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit 22. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 23. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 24. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Community Development." 25. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. 26. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation." 27. Archaeological Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property." 28. Tribal Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer." 29. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition." 30. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved." 31. MSHCP Pre -Construction Survey. A 30 -day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30 -day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. 32. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30 -day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." 33. Rough Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 34. Parking Area Landscaping. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. 35. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 36. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 37. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 38. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 39. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." 40. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 41. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 42. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 43. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for (private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas). Choose those that apply 44. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 45. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape (choose or add to as appropriate) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 46. Landscaping Requirement for Phased Development. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, the landscaping plans shall indicate it will be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. 47 WQMP Treatment Devices. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 48. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 49. Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 50. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 51. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 52. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 53. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Outside Agencies 54. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Healths transmittal dated July 30, 2015, a copy of which is attached. 55. Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated April 29, 2015, a copy of which is attached. 56. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated May 5, 2015, a copy of which is attached. 57. Compliance with County Geologist. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Geologist's transmittal dated September 2, 2015, a copy of which is attached. 58. Compliance with Eastern Information Center. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Information Center's transmittal dated April 29, 2015, a copy of which is attached. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 59. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 60 Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 61. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for onsite improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 62. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 63. Private maintenance. All drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 64. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 65. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable agencies such as the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board (401 certification), Army Corps of Engineers (404 certification), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Section 1603 Streambed Alteration Agreement), RCFC&WCD and other affected agencies. 66. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction -phase pollution -prevention controls to adequately address non -permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at: http://www.cityoftemecula.orgfTemecula/Government/PublicWorks/engineeringconstmanual.htm 67. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 68. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 69. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project -specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link below: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/WQMPandNPDES/WQM P. htm 70. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 71. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 100 -year storm event) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 72. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 73. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 74. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) 75. Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 76. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 77. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works 78. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City's Paving Notes. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 79. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer -of -record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil's engineer -of -record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 80. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all onsite work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 81. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 82. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 83. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements 84. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 85. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2013 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2013 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2013 California Energy Codes, 2013 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code. 86. Disabled Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. All ground floor units to be adaptable. b. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. c. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as club house, trash enclose tot lots and picnic areas. 87, County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 88 Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 89. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 90. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 91, Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. 92. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. 93. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 94. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 95. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal 96. Submitting Plans and Calculations. Applicant must submit to Building and Safety four (4) complete sets of plans and two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review and approval including: a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work. b. A Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2013 edition of the California Building Code. c. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. d. Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 97. Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval. 98. Demolition Permits. A demolition permit shall be obtained if there is an existing structure to be removed as part of the project. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 99. Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction 100. Pre -Construction Meeting. A pre -construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements 101. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x (2) 2 '/2" outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all Commercial projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 102. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 103. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 4 -hour duration for commercial projects. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 104. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 105. Gradient Of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 106. Fire Dept. Turnaround. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 107. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 108. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 109. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 110. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 111. Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 112. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). 113. Knox Box. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). 114. Addressing. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6 -inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 115. Site Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements 116. Defensible Plants. Applicant shall ensure any landscaping surrounding buildings is kept at a height of no more than three feet, or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges, and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to prevent would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 117. Trees. Applicant shall ensure any trees surrounding building rooftops be kept at a distance to prevent roof accessibility by would-be burglars. Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 118. Berms. Any berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 119. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings less than 8 feet high shall be vandal resistant. 120. Exterior Door Illumination. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 121. Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 122. Graffiti. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings or other structures must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP. 123. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, each building or business shall have an alarm system that is monitored by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi -tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall each have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is open 24/7. 124. Roof Hatches. Any roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 125. Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45 -inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 126. Public Telephones. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well -lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. 127. Disable Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 128. Alcohol in Public Prohibited. Applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. 129. Crime Prevention Through Design. Crime prevention through environmental design, as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI), supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included below: 1. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery, or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. 2. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. 3. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. 4. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. 5. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. 6. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. 7. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. 8. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. 9. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 130. Business Security Survey. The Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department offers free business security surveys, to schedule an appointment contact the unit at (951) 506-5132. 131. Contact. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506-5132. roFw -. July 30, 2015 , County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Scott Cooper 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 P.O. BOX 7909 • RIVERSIDE, CA 92513-7909 STEVE VAN STOCKUM, DIRECTOR RECIE Vr AUG 03 2015 SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA — PLANNING APPLICATION FOR PA15-0583 RELIANCE CHURCH MAJOR MODIFICATION (APN 922-130-016) Dear Mr. Cooper: The project listed in the subject heading of this letter is proposing a modification to construct a 12,807 square foot sanctuary, two 13,084 square foot classroom buildings, and a 3, 3475 square foot administration building. The site is at 29825 Santiago Road, Temecula. The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) offers the following comments: WATER AND WASTEWATER The facility is currently serviced by Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and sanitary sewer service from Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). As the sewer agency, EMWD shall have the responsibility of determining any grease interceptor or other requirements, including but not limited to sizing capacity and other structural specifications. Please note that it is the responsibility of the proposed facility to ensure that all requirements to receive potable water service and sanitary sewer service are met with the appropriate purveyors, as well as, all other applicable agencies. Note: A General Condition shall be placed on this project indicating that any existing wells and/or existing onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) shall be properly removed and/or abandoned under permit with the Department of Environmental Health (DEH). ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROGRAMS (ECP) If previously unidentified contamination or the presence of a naturally occurring hazardous material is discovered at the site, assessment, investigation, and/or cleanup may be required. Contact Riverside County Environmental Health - Environmental Cleanup Programs at (951) 955-8980, for further information. Office Locations • Biy'the • Corona • Hemet • Indio • NI 'meta • Paim Strings • Riverside Phone (338)722-4234 w'al,w.rivcoeh.org DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES — PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC FOOD FACILITY Prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall be required to contact DEH District Environmental Services to determine the appropriate food facility plan check and/or permitting requirements. For further information, please call (951) 461-0284. County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health District Environmental Services - Murrieta Office 38740 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite "A" Murrieta CA 92563 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE - NOISE Notwithstanding, a "General Condition" shall be placed on the project indicating that the facility shall comply with the following: 1. Facility -related noise, as projected to any portion of any surrounding property containing a "sensitive receiver, habitable dwelling, hospital, school, library or nursing home ", must not exceed the following worst-case noise levels: 45 dB(A) — 10 minute noise equivalent level ("leq"), between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (nighttime standard) and 65 dB(A) — 10 minute leq, between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. (daytime standard). 2. Whenever a construction site is within one-quarter (1/4) of a mile of an occupied residence or residences, no construction activities shall be undertaken between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. during the months of June through September and between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. during the months of October through May. Exceptions to these standards shall be allowed only with the written consent of the building official. 3. All construction vehicles, equipment fixed or mobile shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with the manufactures' standard. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4. During construction, best efforts should be made to locate stockpiling and/or vehicle staging area as far as practicable from existing noise sensitive receptors (residential dwellings) nearest the project site during all project construction. 5. Enclose the roof -top mechanical ventilation equipment or provide a 3 foot high parapet wall around all rooftop air for building. This wall should block the line -of - sight (view) from the backyard of the nearby homes to the exposed roof and ventilation systems. For further information, please contact the Office of Industrial Hygiene at (951) 955-8982. Should you have any further questions or require further assistance, please contact me by email at kakim@rivcocha.org or by phone at (951) 955-8980. in istine m, REHS Environmental Protection and Oversight Division Land Use and Water Resources Program SR32895 Board of Directors President Randy A. Record Vice President David J Slawson Directors Joseph J Kuebler, CPA Philip E Paule Ronald W. Sullivan General Manager Paul D. Jones II, P.E. Treasurer Joseph J. Kuebler, CPA Chairman of the Boarta The Metropolitan Water District of So. Calif. Randy A. Record Legal Counsel Lemieux & O'Neill EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER D I S T R I C T April 29, 201 City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2015 RE: Case/Plan Number: PA15-0583 Project Name: Reliance Church Sanctuary and Future Classrooms/Office Buildings Project Description: Reliance Church Major Modification Project Location: 29825 Santiago Road (Between Ynez Rd. & 115) Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-130-016 Tract Map. 20591; Lot 8 Thank you for the opportunity to review the above -referenced project. The subject project requires water, recycled water and sewer service from EMWD. The detail of the proposed development requires a submittal to EMWD by the project proponent. Upon receipt of submittal, EMWD will review further and provide requirements for obtaining service(s) which include but not limited to: 1. Discuss potential candidacy for recycled water service 2. Review of the project within the context of existing infrastructure 3. Evaluation of the project's preliminary design and points of connections 4. Formal Application for Service detailing applicable fees and deposits to proceed with EMWD approved service connections. To begin the submittal process the project proponent may contact EMWD's New Development Department at: Eastern Municipal Water District New Business Development 2270 Trumble Rd Perris CA 92570 (951) 9283777 Extension 2081 Again, EMWD appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Sincerely, of y«`-- Elena Navarre Administrative Assistant New Business Development Engineering Department Mailing Address: Post Office Box 8300 Perris, CA 92572-8300 Telephone: (951) 928-3777 Fax: (951) 928-6177 Location: 2270 Trumble Road Perris, CA 92570 Internet: www.erwd.org uk�t I1tt t1111i11AI %tI11111IS1i#if', Board of Directors John E. Hoagland President James "Stew" Stewart Sr. Vice President Stephen J. Corona Ben R. Drake Lisa D. Herman William E. Plummer Roger C. Ziemer Officers Matthew G. Stone General Manager Richard S. Williamson, P.E. Assistant General Manager Jeffrey D. Armstrong CFO/Treasurer Fred F. Edgecomb, MPA Director of Operations & Maintenance Andrew L. Webster, P.E. Chief Engineer Kelli E. Garcia District Secretary James B. Gilpin Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel Scott Cooper City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 RECEIVED MAY 0 8 2015 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY 29825 SANTIAGO ROAD; LOT NO. 8 OF TRACT MAP NO. 20591; PA 15-0583; APN 922-130-016 [RELIANCE CHURCH] Dear Mr. Cooper: Please be advised that the above -referenced project/property is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD/District). The subject project/property fronts an existing 24 -inch diameter water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Santiago Road. Water service to the subject project/property exists under Account No. 3012015, Location No. 2009339 and Account No. 3057758, Location No. 2009340. Additions or modifications to water/sewer service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Where private on-site water facilities (for water service, fire service, irrigation, or other purpose) will cross or will be shared amongst multiple lots/project units (only by special variance of the Rules and Regulations), and/or where such `common' facilities will be owned and maintained by a Property Owners' Association, RCWD requires execution and recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement or equivalent document of covenants, codes, and restrictions. Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) destroying all on- site wells and signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is subject to water supply shortage contingency measures in effect (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances and policy), and/or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment for the development, as determined by the Lead Agency. Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 Letter to Scott Cooper/City of Temecula May 5, 2015 Page Two There is no recycled water currently available within the limits established by Resolution 2007- 10-5. Should recycled water become available in the future, the project/property may be required to retrofit its facilities to make use of this availability in accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. As soon as feasible, and prior to the preparation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project -specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project -specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided Municipal Water District. If no sewer service is currently available to project/property, all proposed waste discharge systems must comply with the Resources Control Board and/or health department requirements. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Services Representative at the District office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Kim K rckhoff Engineering Service Representative cc: Corey Wallace, Engineering Manager-CIP & Development Phillip Dauben, Associate Engineer Heath McMahon, Construction Contracts Manager Corry Smith, Engineering Services Supervisor Scott T. Losee, Reliance Church l5\KK:l in017\F450\FEG by Eastern the subject State Water Engineering Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589-90] 7 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 iryof Fax From 959552767 Page: 1/2 Date 9/29/2015 3:34:36 I 6.* RalY.E R S I D E C O U N T F PLANNING DEPARTMENT • �ii Stevan Writs Planning Director September 2, 2015 City of Temecula Planning Department FAX: (951) 694-6477 Attention: Scott Cooper RE: Approval Comments GE002455 City of Temecula Case No. FA15-0583 Pages 2 (including this cover) County Geologic Report GEO No. 2455, submitted for the project Parcel Map (PA15-0583) was prepared by LGC Geo -Environmental, Inc. (LGC). The report is titled; Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Reliance Church Development, Located At, 20825 Santiago Road, City of Temecula, Riverside County, California" dated August 17, 2015. In addition, LGC Geo -Environmental submitted, "Response to County Comments for the Proposed Reliance Church Development, Located at 29825 Santiago Road, City of Temecula, Riverside County, California", dated September 18,2015. This document is herein incorporated in GE002455. GE002455 Concluded: 1. The subject site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone_ 2. There are no known faults onsite. 3. The possibility of damage due to ground rupture is considered nil. 4_ Cohesive soils are not considered susceptible to liquefaction. 5. There are not any known landslides that impact the site_ 6. The upper soils indicate a "very low" expansion potential. 7. Artificial fill or weathered/low density portions may be prone to potential post -grading settlement and/or hydro -consolidation. 8. The potential of seiche and/or tsunami is considered to be nil, GE002455 Recommended: 1. Prior to grading of areas to receive structural fill or engineered structure, the areas should be cleared of surface obstruction, any existing debris, potentially compressible material, and stripped of vegetation. Riverside Office • 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Desert Office • 77588 El Duna Court P.O. Box 1409, Riverside. California 92502-1409 Palm Desert, California :92211,_.x,. {954195t32r70 • Fax (51) 955-1811 (7805_863-8277 • Fax (760).863-7555 . . This fax was received by GFI FaxMaker fax server For more information, visit: http:llwww.gfi.com u u Cityof1c.�IeincormrgEscFrom 9519552767 Page: 2/2 9129/201�5334.3t 2. Potentially compressible artificial fill or weathered/low density portions will require over excavation. GEO No. 2455 satisfies the requirement for a geologic/geotechnical study For Planning/CEQA purposes. GEO No. 2455 is hereby accepted for Planning purposes. Engineering and other Building Code parameters were not included as a part of this review or approval. This approval is not intended and should not be misconstrued as approval for grading permit Engineering and other building code parameters should be reviewed and additional comments and/or conditions may be imposed by the City upon application for grading and/or building permits. Thank you for the opportunity to review this case for the City of Temecula. Please call me at (951) 955-6863 if you have any questions. Sincerely, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Steven Weiss, Planning Director d L. Jones, CEG No. 2283 Chie Engineering Geologist, TLMA-Planning cc: Eng/Rep. Joseph Montgomery, Fax: (951)719-2998 Applicant: Scott Losee, Fax: (951)268-8004 B:1GeologY\Ternecula Reviews1GE002455_ Approval PA15-0583.docx This fax was received by GFI FaxMaker fax server For more information, visit: http://www.gfi.com EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0418 (951) 827-5745 - Fax (951) 827-5409 - eickw@ucr.edu Inyo, Mono, and Riverside Counties TO: City of Temecula Planning Department RE: Cultural Resource Review Case: PA15-0583 April 29, 2015 Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System have been reviewed to determine if this project would adversely affect prehistoric or historic cultural resources: The proposed project area has not been surveyed for cultural resources and contains or is adjacent to known cultural resource(s). A Phase I study is recommended. Based upon existing data the proposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase I study is recommended. A Phase I cultural resource study (RI- ) identified one or more cultural resources. The project area contains, or has the possibility of containing, cultural resources. However, due to the nature of the project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not anticipated. Further study is not recommended. X A Phase I cultural resource study (RI -1048, RI -6612) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not recommended. There is a low probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended. X If, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate area while a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations. Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the area, earthmoving during construction should be monitored by a professional archaeologist. The submission of a cultural resource management report is recommended following guidelines for Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin 4(a), December 1989. Phase I Records search and field survey Phase II Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for "significant" sites.] Phase III Mitigation [Preservation by avoidance or data -recovery investigation, or a combination of both.] Phase IV Monitor earthmoving activities COMMENTS: If you have any questions, please contact us. Eastern Information Center NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: PA15-0583 Rick Jaeger A Major Modification Application for the construction of a 12,807 square -foot sanctuary, a 15,460 square -foot, two-story classroom building, and a 3,006 square -foot administration building located at 29825 Santiago Drive In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects) Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 City of Temecula, Council Chambers November 18, 2015 6:00 p.m. The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityofterrecula.orq. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. DATE OF MEETING: TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: APPLICANT NAME: PROJECT SUM MARY: CEQA: STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION November 18, 2015 Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Matt Peters, AICP, Case Planner Carver Chiu, Crown Castle NG West LLC Planning Application No. PA15-0937, a Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -08m1) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the intersection of Asti Way and Messina Street Notice of Determination Section 15162, Subsequent EI Rs and Negative Declarations RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the Project subject to Conditions of Approval BACKGROUND SUMMARY Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops, and operates fiber - fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS") to provide wireless telecommunication services. The proposed DAS network is a low profile system capable of delivering wireless telecommunications service to customers of multiple carriers such as AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and MetroPCS. The proposed network initially will supply the infrastructure for Crown Castle's anchor tenant, MetroPCS. The network utilizes a series of small, low-power antennas called "nodes," which receive an optical signal from a central hub and distribute the signal in the form of Radio Frequency (RF) transmissions. For this Project, three other nodes were located outside the City boundary (one in the County of Riverside and two in the City of Murrieta). Of the 39 nodes proposed to be located in the City of Temecula right-of-way, 38 have already been constructed, and are operational. TM -08m1 is the final remaining DAS node. Each node consists either of antenna arrays constructed within or on a slim -line monopole designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right-of-way, or antenna arrays fixed to existing utility poles owned by the Joint Pole Committee ("JPC"). Each facility generally features a 53.74 -inch Kathrein Tri -sector antenna within a flush -mounted housing (for new poles) or three Kathrein antennas mounted to existing JPC utility poles. Both configurations will feature one or more Flex Wave Prisms or similar "fiber repeaters" mounted to either the new street light or the existing JPC utility pole. The fiber repeater converts digitalized spectrum C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDCWE2E7D9B-C4E4-4879-B0F6-274F17937FB5\11263.doc 1 received from the hub into RF signals emitted from the antenna array. Where the new node is proposed for an existing JPC pole, the facility also features a ground mounted meter pedestal. The Project involves the installation of both aerial fiber-optic cable on existing wood utility poles and newly installed street lights, and underground fiber-optic cable installed within newly installed and existing poly vinyl chloride (PVC) conduit in previously disturbed rights-of-way. The newly installed fiber-optic cable would connect 39 distributed antenna system nodes and ancillary optical conversion and power equipment also attached to the same utility poles within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way. The entire network will be connected to a previously installed fiber-optic base station hub. Construction of the proposed DAS Project will consist specifically of the following: • Installation of 39 DAS nodes designed as streetlights, of which 38 have already been constructed, each containing either: one (1) tri -sector pipe antenna, three (3) antennae inside radomes, or between three (3) and six (6) panel antennas installed on the utility pole; • Installation of fiber-optic equipment (i.e. optical conversion equipment, signal regeneration equipment, switching equipment, etc.) mounted on existing wood and newly -installed street lights; • Installation of four -inch Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) conduit; • Aerial installation of fiber-optic cable onto existing or new wood and street lights; • Underground installation of fiber-optic cable into existing and newly installed conduit; • Underground connection of network to one (1) hub facility installed inside an existing public storage facility located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Road; • Installation of pull boxes and hand holes; and • Splicing of fiber-optic cable into facilities. The location of the proposed Project is illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan included with the Initial Study, and each location is further described on a corresponding spreadsheet, attached to this report. Engineering drawings for a new street light and co -location on an existing utility are also attached. Construction of the previous 38 nodes lasted approximately 120 days, in various phases, and consisted of two (2) aerial crews and two (2) underground crews working simultaneously to complete construction of the proposed Project during 2011 to 2013. The most recent node to be constructed, TM -18m1, was just completed during October, 2015. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. DAS NODE TM -08 HISTORY TM -08 (PA11-0104) was originally approved at the corner of Sunny Meadows Drive and Jerez Lane on July 6, 2011. The project was subsequently appealed (PA11-0201) for questions regarding the applicant's evidence that there was a significant gap in coverage, and for concerns over RF exposure. Over the next three and a half years, City Staff, the applicant (Crown Castle), the appellant, and a representative from the Paseo Del Sol Homeowners C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDCWE2E7D9B-C4E4-4879-B0F6-274F17937FB5\11263.doc 2 Association researched multiple alternative locations. As a result of the time lapse exploring alternative sites, Crown Castle's original approval for PA11-0104 expired, and the Appeal application was subsequently withdrawn. The proposed site for TM -08m1 is the result of extensive efforts to find a suitable location to all parties. ANALYSIS Given the large size of the overall Project, City staff worked with Crown Castle to break the Project down into manageable batches of approximately five to ten Planning Applications for each hearing. The first batch was was approved on March 16, 2011. Subsequent batches were approved during 2011 and 2012. Of the 39 nodes that were proposed to be located in the City of Temecula right-of-way, 38 have already been constructed, and are operational. TM -08m1 is the last remaining node. TM -08m1 will have the same finish and light arm attachment as a standard Southern California Edison street light. Other than the antenna arrays, the only minor differences between the poles will be a slightly larger outside diameter (eight inches for standard SCE light pole versus ten inches for NewPath/Crown Castle), and a taller overall height (32 feet versus approximately 40 - feet high). It should be noted that the top of the luminaire or light fixture will be 32 feet for consistency along the street right-of-way. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the U -T San Diego on November 5, 2015 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration approved March 16, 2011 and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EI Rs and Negative Declarations). FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDCWE2E7D9B-C4E4-4879-B0F6-274F17937FB5\11263.doc 3 The antennas have been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right-of-way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The wireless antennas will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the use is based record as a whole before the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Initial Study — Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring Plan Alternative Site Analysis Notice of Public Hearing deny the application for a Conditional of the record as a whole before the on substantial evidence in view of the C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDCWE2E7D9B-C4E4-4879-B0F6-274F17937FB5\11263.doc 4 VICINITY MAP City of Temecula PAI 5-0937 4 • **Aiti ais:4#4, Project Site 1111 • 441 ■I �� P 2 7 MFSS/N � ST NORTH 0 125 250 Feet IttrMENw This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County- The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map,. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information, This map is not for reprint or resale, 33 Gecgruphic IrtlQrmatlwn Systems PLAN REDUCTIONS E oba TITLE SHEET ti IJ - 0 U 0 CD r Z W I o U m Z , O U m W O LA v J CO cn W .. Q rn> m Z _ J _ NN J 0,3 CD,Oa m wI 00 vU- W Z J2wO m Z m HNm NZvJwW w_,0Ow._.00woO» NO 0,O Lal . aUd�d d U 3 OO3UM CROWN CASTLE Crown Cade T =endows PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC, C E i PROM=IA: 76000678-15 WOW 07-14-14 PRELIMINARY Mira 08-01-14 REVISED PER :LIENTS COMMENTS • li ti IJ - 0 U 0 CD r Z W I o U m Z , O U m W O LA v J CO cn W .. Q rn> m Z _ J _ NN J 0,3 CD,Oa m wI 00 vU- W Z J2wO m Z m HNm NZvJwW w_,0Ow._.00woO» NO 0,O Lal . aUd�d d U 3 OO3UM E 9 g H a6 EQUIPMENT DETAILS Z J On U 0 ey 44 0 S 1.0 MEE LL 0 N v 2 171 a VECTOR DETAIL (LOWER ARRAY) OLIO L-009 fUf311T1 NOON aE-Li VECTOR DETAIL (TOP ARRAY) CO '7j-f A ED ED a r a (0 L L -4.4-,-r1.^. 9 9- aa STEEL POLE MOUNTING CIRCUIT BREAKER ENCLOSURE TYPICAL EQUIPMENT DETAIL 00 SPLITTER DETAIL Clamping ring 19 47, c0 Mechanical Interface r� Customer -supplied flang e 0 M TRI -SECTOR UNICELL MOUNTING DETAILS POWER PEDESTAL DETAILS ag CI IA r 0 Z 0 0UI C7 U 5 O K V Ca K � V ELI- EL f w a0 o t/l ,9I ,V. 310000 R. 12 0 g A LI F u_ 0 0 co K SINGLE METER SERVICE PEDESTAL TYPICAL PEDESTAL MOUNTING DETAIL STANDARD FEATURES 0 U rg e IN e sg � '&p IP Cit ?4.zazF s -f s carr! ang7G Tj� 4 — r 60 x'15' ° 5g - bpz.ter°e §�Ln - �ey���� a64ld; EF .rmI N ce (0 IN e ELEVATIONS O of r�3 m LOOKING SOUTHEAST SITE LOCATION PHOTOS ZLii J: O < e uu: et I 14 N Ig! CO I o r O O O wr 0 F- a 0 O J o 2 1-) 1/1 W w = w a F O z az z O 0 O O Q O 0 J 0 0 W O 0 0 0 a z 0 1- 0 0 J F- S O J N F- LA -Wce O � Z a O z z 0 O O 4 O J O 0 W 0 O 0 O 0 a z 0 1- 0 0 LL 0 o 8 0 F- O = a a 0 z a 1 2 0 0 0 W H N 5 5 g F N tg V 0 PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA15-0937, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -08M1) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE INTERSECTION OF ASTI WAY AND MESSINA STREET Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June19, 2015 Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA15-0937, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on November 18, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA15-0937 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antennas have been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right-of-way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The wireless antennas will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application, PA15-0937: a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street Tight pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right of way at the intersection of Asti Way and Messina Street. A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, and the subsequent environmental reviews required as mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application does not require the preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Conditional Use Permit Application will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application are adequately addressed by the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the mitigation measures contained therein will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. No additional environmental documentation is required. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA15-0937, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the intersection of Asti Way and Messina Street, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 18th day of November 2015. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 15- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of November 2015, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: QUIMBY: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA15-0937 A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -08m1) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the intersection of Asti Way and Messina Street City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way NA (no grading) NA (no new square footage) NA (no new square footage) NA (non-residential) November 18, 2015 November 18, 2017 PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Two Hundred Thirty -One Dollars and Twenty -Five Cents ($2,231.25) which includes the Two Thousand One Hundred Eighty -One Dollars and Twenty -Five Cents ($2,181.25) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Community Development Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three (3) one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. PL -9. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right-of-way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray/Metal/Off-White to Existing Wood Utility Poles The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis/Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in -lieu of, the right of the City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right -of -Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Community Development Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Community Development Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Community Development Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Community Development Director." PL -15. The maintenance/facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Community Development Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre -construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2013 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2013 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B-4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirementsl PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 -feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW-5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right-of-way. The number of active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works Inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. INITIAL STUDY City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT: APPLICANT: NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle LOCATION: The Project includes the installation of 39 DAS nodes within the City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way, County of Riverside DESCRIPTION: NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (DAS) to provide wireless telecommunication services to multiple carriers. NewPath proposes to develop a 39 -node DAS throughout the publicly owned City right-of-way (see map on back side of this Notice). The network utilizes a series of small, low-power antennas called "nodes_' Each node consists of antenna rays constructed within or on a new slim line monopole camouflaged as a new street light, or located on an existing utility pole. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 8 will be attached to existing utility poles. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the Planning Commission intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the project design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program will be included as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project, which is available for review at City Hall. The Comment Period for this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is February 14, 2011 to March 15, 2011. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033. City Hall is located at 41000 Main Street. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through: ®The Local Newspaper ❑Pasting the Site ®Notice to Adjacent Property Owners If you need additional information or have any questions conceming this project, please contact Matthew D. Peters,�AI`CP at (951) 694-6408. Prepared by: tori ac7 t. ct (Signature) (Title) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Lead Agency Name and Address NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Protect City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033. Temecula. CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Protect Location Matthew D. Peters. AICP (951) 694-6408 The Project includes the installation of a 39 -node wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) within the City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way, County of Riverside (see attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan for locations) Project Sponsor's Name and Address Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath c/o Crown Castle USA Maximize Communications Group, Inc. 1351 Pomona Rd., Suite 110 Corona, CA 92882 NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle USA 1100 Dexter Ave., Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98109 General Plan Designation NA (Not Applicable) — all antennas will be located on new street lights or existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned richt-of-way. Zoning Description of Project NA (Not Applicable)— all antennas will be located on new street lights or existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right of -way. NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS") to provide wireless telecommunication services. The proposed DAS network is a low profile system capable of delivering wireless telecommunications service to customers of multiple carriers such as AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and MetroPCS. The proposed network initially will supply the infrastructure for NewPath's anchor tenant, MetroPCS. The network utilizes a series of small, low-power antennas called, "nodes," which receive an optical signal from a central hub and distribute the signal in the form of Radio Frequency (RF) transmissions. For this Project, the hub is outside the City's boundaries (as are three other nodes, one in the County of Riverside and two in the City of Murrieta). Within the City of Temecula, the proposed network consists only of the antenna nodes. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right-of-way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. G:IPLANNING120101PA10-0186 NewPath Nelwnrks TM -01 CUP1PIanntng PIanning CommiselontCEQA Irftlal Study,doc 1 Each node consists either of antenna arrays constructed within or on a sling -line monopole designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right-of-way, or antenna arrays fixod to existing utility poles owned by the Joint Pole Committee ("JPC/). Each facility generally features a 53.74 -inch Kathrein Tri -sector antenna within a flush -mounted housing (for new poles) or three Kathrein antennas mounted to existing JPC utility poles. Either configuration also will feature one or more Flex Wave Prisms or similar "fiber repeaters" mounted to either the new street light or the existing JPC utility pole. The fiber repeater converts digitalized spectrum received from the hub into RF signals emitted from the antenna array. Where the new node is proposed for an existing JPC pole, the facility also features a ground mounted meter pedestal. The Project involves the installation of both aerial fiber-optic cable on existing wood utility and newly installed street lights, and underground fiber-eptic cable Installed within newly installed and existing poly vinyl chloride (PVC) conduit in previously disturbed rights of way. The newly installed fiber-optic cable would connect 39 distributed antenna system nodes and ancillary optical converston and power equipment also attached to the same utility poles within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way, Another three will be installed outside the City limits; two in the City of Murrieta and one in the County of Riverside. The entire network will be connected to a newly installed fiber-optic base station hub. Construction of the proposed DAS Project will consist specifically of the following; • Installation by NewPath of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed as street lights; • Installation of 39 DAS nodes each containing either: one (1) tri -sector pipe antenna, three (3) antennae insiode radomes, or between three (3) and six (6) panel antennas installed on the utility pole; • Installation of fiber-optic equipment (i.e. optical conversion equipment, signal regeneration equipment, switching equipment, etc...) mounted on existing wood and newly - installed street lights; • Installation of 4 -inch Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) conduit • Aerial installation of fiber-optic cable onto existing or new wood and street lights; • Underground installation of fiber-optic cable into existing and newly installed conduit; • Underground connection of network to ane (1) hub facility to be installed inside an existing public storage facility located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Rd.; • Installation of pull boxes and hand holes; and • Splicing of fiber-optic cable into facilities. The location of the proposed Project is illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan, and each location is further described on a corresponding and attached spreadsheet. Engineering drawings for a new street light and co -location on an G:IPLANNING120101PAt0-018O NewPath Networks T11,4411 L;Uptair,nhaTlaming CommissionlCE A Elmet Study dQc 2 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Other public agencies whose approval 1. is required existing utility are also attached. Construction Is expected to last approximately 120 days and MI consist of two (2) aerial crews and two (2) underground crews working simultaneously to complete construction of the proposed Project. The Project proposes to develop a 39 -node DAS network throughout the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way adjacent to various commercial and residential zones None GAPLANNINQ120101PA10-0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 QUMPIwrrung1Planning CommsstonICEQA !Mai Siudy.doc 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that Is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Noise Air Quality Population and Housing Biological Resources Public Services Greenhouse Gas Emissions Recreation Cultural Resources Transportation and Traffic Geology and Solis Utilities and Service Systems Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mandatory Findings of Significance Hydrology and Water Quality None Land Use and Plannin Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a ' NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect- on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but It must anae only the effects that remain to be addressed. find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed Upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. IJI Signature utibtki pctvrtl Printed Name Date For 'Ergo, 101 A011 Ci 11 i -P T c w« <,,1 Ik , GAPLANNING12010lPA10-0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP PIannIng\Planning CommisslanlCEQA Initial Study.doc 4 41 a1 o g a 4 Q t: a 00 00 4.r 4+ ++ ++ 4+ 4+ r 4+i-' +. C C r .c .0 . .0 . - .0 . . - . - .c .c .c . .G - ++ 4. t 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 E6 b0 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 m N VI 00 J J J —1 J J J J J J E J d.' 4 4+ 4+ . 4+ 4' Y 4+ M 4+ t) Lu 4+ 41 4► 41 m w V 4f a 4) 41 d 41 a1 v v 0. E E 41 E E E E ' 41 da I- a as E E a1 0 o g1 L L L L L �.. L E. L L N {+ I.= MvsutcnCA til SA �vsysysysMtn vii v1 it=u: CV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 y y o at vi di 41 4; 4i di 0? 43 41 a, 01 43 V 40 CO 4i a3 4. 4.. 1. CL ZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZ Z ZZ Z Q Q Z ecce cc 0• to 4 Dcr to m ..a O. at o V- o c ti • c LP C 41 E o as oa 4/ L o a L° m 17 atiU *f- ...14 c 0 3 m0 a tCp al U C o cc all �A L �' - 44..,. 7 0 ,. y '0 to 4l be O to C as 41 m I _ h P. T � � � O 2 5":V N ti p-Ul7 Y liIn ei >. n. 3 N \\ mt��3La C't,,10 r... Zw 1 m - n2 0C 41 0: 'i calf O ED R O IT R d O �o d '� m a! > 1-. 4a In 4i 7 m 3 c 4o o z W. Q N O O y f 0 t7. 0C C C CU m v m dL. �' Ti H '2 E = 2 mO 'o N 3 in vs V1 W 4 M 0 Q a U u 'd di 7— — t in [u v1 41�3va,t°n2 33u v ti3 4gQ°t+p'v 41 fu 0 CC m us 4/ in u -O sa a1 CL m c 0 4J +' ba in V ill , io9 m m Q U O m r dl t s 3 O m to «s C.. U a3 '1J u uo`� u M ` m 0 V 4-1 J.i i` IA N 0 0 " J 0c0 J p Ma ._ In ...., n ,� 10''Cg 40 LC GI o C CC N m 00 0: m L 3 -I H ID I.J N a1 izt ec > c c s a pm, m V 0 a 4 LI �irfininwin� z W .....17) ?H v 3 �-1 999evlN N 4 �! ri �° G:\PLANNING\2010\PA10-0186 NewPath Networks TM-01 CUP\Planning\Copy of DA$ System Overview Complete by Frlciveri a, a, a, a 0 a w a. -, 0 Cu ao m n m 4+ 4+ N M �+ 4+ 4+ 4/ c 0 c 4• 4+ 4+ 4' 4' 4 00 LDO �+ Lm dao DO m -Cu, tbo 'C oo y m K .0.0 ,b=_ia aD .JJ mJJ•J =�8 .�3JJ :i - .;:i 4+ 4+ 4, 4+ 4+ 4+ 4, 4+ 4+ 4, 4+ 4+ 4+ 4, 4O Op Q{ -0 V a, a, a, a, a V O E `! 2 L V E d a) G Y 01 C M L L V1 VI L N N 1111 H ) m t 3 t 1) V1 /r1 VI N N 0 er1' 01 a, aw, g aw', w aw, w N aUi ip U ' aV aWi w a3, a3, v 01 'i Z Z< Z Z Z Z Z Z Q 41 Q Z Z ZZ ZZ 4 C Q t SI 11 a, l Q O d i to la N4. co -0 d H> ee, 0, of o 7 y R ac O a, O C C is t0 u N u E U t.y m v mp o l0 c i— D 15, t O c > a 2 _ to 5 p Tu - co N ' c o 120 �� c< I W i °1 to to u o o v ......111 0 CC Oly ° O O j U O 4o+ g c c> ..- a, LP -,z D{ O o u► 3 O O Z Q' .i 11, 3 :17 N C ( }S 2 cc 1° - .4. drn fa �" ° O La vii o o n Qv, 0 1n ` ` er1 T C 2. er cD •— X a (••/ 'p O ,g a, -6 ea ea r 4+ >' in ri C 7 ea ac o: T 3 CD c ._ r+ ac a o a�, o�;a eeg To .(,=.1 eO ev eoaVYa ou dlg�� �0 r °�O •c o v 3 c c a. vin r z e=o 4' ar C r c E L w L° _ c v fa cQi o C�3 'n �i Ti } a `o' C . , E o = I.N.in g= ac,,; CI) 9 _`° o a c� z 3 3 0 u z e. z z l T z 41, W z Z z z {l z i % W 0 00 01 0 N 01 N en ID N 01 0 .-f N eD n op C en .i .-I N N N N 4 N N N N rn M M rn rn t.9 nn T. Caaaaaix n e e i e i e e 1 1 1 , Total Footage Placed G:\PLANNING\2010\PA10-0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning\Copy of DAS System Overview Complete by Friciveri 51 2 I 1 1 + I. ric° 1 k Ia “1104:a; 4 g 4; 110 g is go Infixitlioe sigAll 101 Zihililifi N n A T 5 5 gr } � J riu) ct 1 1 727/ 1! L R -s 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and supporting Informatlon Sources a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: Potentially Significant Image[ Less Than Slgntftcant with Mltlgation Int nrenretv,.A Lees Than Slgnlficant Impact No Impact X x X See the attached maps and exhibits included in the Project description for more information on the locafion and design of the DAS nodes. 1.a.b: No Impact; As indicated in the General Plan (Figure CD -1), The Project and the location of the nodes will not have an effect on a scenic vissta or substantially damage any scenic resources as they are all located In the City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way adjacent to commercial or residential areas. 1.c. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The installation of aerial cable on existing poles would further add to the number of cables attached to the poles. These would be attached near phone and cable TV cables and would incrementally add to the visual impact of these structures. This additional impact would constitute a less -than -significant impact due to the presence of other cables on the poles. However, the proposed Project includes the installation of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed to match existing street lights located throughout the City right-of-way and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. The street light design will help the antennas blend in with the surrounding environment. In some cases. street lights may not blend in a rural area where no street lights exist. In order to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area, the following mitigation is required to ensure a less than significant visual and aesthetic impact: Mitigation Measure A-1. New slim -line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street light pole to match existing street lights in the right-of-way. If a new street Tight is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim -line monopole with concrete street light base — minus the "cobra" light arm may be acceptable. in rural areas, where street lights don't exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete "street light" type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights td. Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance 655). Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down io avoid giare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Lighting issues are addressed during the City's plan review and inspection process. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G:1PLANNlNG1201OIPA10-0186 NewPat t Networks TM -01 CUPIPIannInalPlanntna CommIssionlCEQA Mai Studv.doc 6 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing Impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information complied by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided In Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant impact Lass Than SlgnmcardWIth Less Than Mitigation Significant Irrrre.nraiad knead Ns Imaad Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X X Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Govemment Code section 51104(a)? Result in the Toss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Comments: x X 2.a. No Impact: The project has been or would be located entirely within the existing publicly owned right- of-way ightof-way along existing roadways and within generally urban and residentially developed areas. No portion of the project site or adjacent areas is considered to be Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. 2.b. No Impact: The project is located within a publicly owned right-of-way and is not zoned for agricultural use or under a Williamson Act Contract. 2.c.d.e. No Impact: The project is in a publicly owned right-of-way that is not used or zoned for agriculture, timberland or forest uses. There would be no conversion of land from forest or farmland since none exists. G:IPLANNING20101PA10-0188 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\PtaiinIng\Planning CommisslonSCEQA Initlal Studydoc 8 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potantia IV Significant Impact Lasses Significant with Mitigation incorporated X Lase Than Significant Imeact No {nowt a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected airguality violation? _ X c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: Construction of the Project will consist of four (4) work crews (two (21 aerial crews and two [2] underground crew) who will work simultaneously until completion. Each work crew will install ail described components of the Project as they progress along the Project alignment. A typical underground crew will consist of the following: 1 backhoe 1 HDD bore machine 3 standard pickup trucks 1 dump Ind( 2 hand-held vibratory compactors 1 saw cutter 1 crane The following labor crew will be required: 1 foreman, 2 operators, 3 laborers (including flagmen), and 1 inspector. A typical aerial cable placing crew will consist of the following equipment; 2 aerial cable -placing vehicles 1 cable reel trailer 1 supply and equipment truck 1 pickup truck A typical aerial crew will consist of an aerial cable -placing vehicle with a driver. an in -bucket operator and one or two flagmen, depending on traffic conditions. 3.a. -d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation incorporated: The project does not include deveiopment of new hones or businesses and, therefore, wouid not induce popuiation growth in the South Coast Air Basin. G;lPLANNING120101PA10.0186 NewPath Netwodss TIM -01 CUP1PIanningiPfawkig Comitssion\ GEOA ir>HIaI Studv doc T Emissions during construction would result in minimal emissions from occasional vehicle trips to maintain the project facilities. Short-term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction would be less than significant through the implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM), as well as the following mitigation: Mitigation Measuras Air Quality 1: • Minimize land disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust exceed 25 miles per enough to prevent dispersion • Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials. hour unless the soil is wet that has been carried onto 3.e. Less Than Significant: The construction of the project could generate fumes from the operation of construction equipment and from asphalt paving, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposurtes would be short term and/or transient since they would occur during the construction phase only. Furhtermore, SCAQMD rules restrict VOC content (the source of odor -causing compounds) in asphalt and paints. The project would utilize typical construction techniques in compliance with SCAQMD rules. As such, project construction would not cause an odor nuisance, and odor impacts would be less than significant. G:IPLANNING120101PA10-9188 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUPIPIannfnglPfanning Commisslon%CEQA In al Study.doc 8 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources a b Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildfrfe Service? Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (Including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc,) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments: Potenttolly Significant impact Leas Than Significant With Mitigation incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impel x X X X X X 4.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will be constructed within the publicly owned right-of-way, which consists of primarily paved surfaces with no riparian habitat or habitat for sensitive species, wetlands, vernal pools, or marshes. No tree removal Is anticipated and no migratory routes or wildlife corridors have been Identified. There may be a potential for indirect impact to habitat from construction runoff or release of hazardous substances from construction. However, these potential impacts are discussed under Section 8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and are reduced to level that is less than significant through the implementation of an existing Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SPCP). 4.e, f. No impact: The project would not result in tree removal or impacts to biological resources. The project site is not located within a habitat conservation area; therefore no impact would occur. G:4PtANNINGL0101PA10-0166 NewPattt Net'.cr TM U1 CUPPIamlrgiPlanning CommissiontGEQA Initial Sludy.doc ii 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project Issues and Supporting Information Sources Less Than Potentially SlgnlfIcard Wfth Significant MtligeIion impact _ Incorporated b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact X X Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: X 5.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is to be constructed in the publicly owned right- of-way, which has been previously disturbed by grading, roadway, and sidewalk construction. It is not likely that intact resources would still exist in most of the project area; however, there is a potential that resources could be present In Tess disturbed areas. As a result, the following standard note shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an Independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeologicar/culturai resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." G:1PL.ANNENG120101PA10-0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUPIPfannfn0\Planning Comr issionlCE A IniifaJ Study.doc 10 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues end Supporting Information Sources Poter,Gai;y SIgnfRcari Impact Less Than Significant WUh Mitigation Irrcor • • , ted Less Than Signlllcant hipnrl No Impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii Seismic -related ground failure, including l que€action? 1 X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c d Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result} of the project, ;^and ptentially result in on= or off-site landslide, lateral s• readirt■ , subsidence, H. uefaction or colla • se? X Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to fife or property? Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X X e Comments: 6.a.i., ii., iii. Less Than Significant Impact; The Elsinore Fault traverses the City of Temecula and is located in an area of high seismic activity and faulting.. In addition, the project area may be subject to severe ground shaking from a seismic event since the area also has high liquefaction potential. The project will be designed to comply with the City's seismic design standards for utilities, resulting in a less than significant impact. 6.a.iv. No impact: While the City of Temecula has rolling hills and areas of steep topography, the individual project sites for each node within the publicly owned right -of way are relatively flat and not prone to landslides. No impact would or. ur. 6.b. Less Than Significant impact: The erosion hazard of the soils in most of the project area is slight. In addition. much of the area in the public right -of way where the nodes will be installed include turf. Erosion controls will be used where necessary along the proposed project route. The most likely situations for the use of controls will be when construction activities occur near storm drains and in landscaped areas where the slope of hillsides is steep. Control measures that may be used include silt fence, certified weed -free straw wattles and straw bales, and other control measures as necessary. Each node will require an encroachment permit to be issued by the Department of Public Works resulting in a less than significant impact. 6.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: As described above, the area is prone to liquefaction, and areas with expansive soils. The impact is considered less than significant as each node will be reviewed by the Department of Building and Safety for compliance with seismic design standards for utilities. G:IPLANNING12010tpA10.0186 NewPath Nataorks TM -01 CliPlPlanninnlPiwnnlno Crrmm c'. CEQA wear Ste/woc 6.e. No Impact: Septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems are not a part of the project. No impact would occur. G:IPLANNING120101PA10-0100 Neecath Networks TM -01 CUP1P'fannin0lPfanning CommrasioWEQA Inftta! Staiy.doc 12 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the protect: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse oases? Comments: Potentially Significant Impact Leu Than Significant With Lifts/km Incorporated Lass Than Sign/Scant knead No Impact X X 7.a.b. No Impact: The proposed Project involves the Installation of new concrete street light poles and new antennas on existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way. The new and existing poles will not generate noise or greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, no impacts will occur. GAPLANNING120101PA10-0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP1PIannIng\PiannIng CammisslonICEQA Irftfa( Study.doc 13 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Inc,morated Lees Than Sign/runt Impact No Impact Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? x b c Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? _ X d _ x e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? x h Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, Injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wifdlands? X Comments: 8.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activities have the potential to release three primary types of materials into the environment: petroleum based products used in construction equipment, bentonite slurry from boring operations, and runoff of silt -laden water from the construction site. To reduce the potential for release of these materials and to minimize the impacts associated with an inadvertent spill, NewPath will implement an existing Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SPCP). This plan will evaluate potential spoil scenarios, identify avoidance and prevention measures, and identify response actions to such situations in order to reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. 8.e. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The City's GIS mapping system identifies portions of the project area as being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. The project is subject to review and comment by the Riverside Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). The City of Temecula will require the project to be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to issuance of any permits. As previously provided for other projects in Airport Zones in the City of Temecula, the following standard mitigation measures will be required: G:IPLANNING120101PA10-0766 NewPath NeMvrks TM 01 CUP\PIannrnglPlrrnnIng CommrssfoMCEQA Initial SWdy.doc 14 Mitigation Measure Haz 1: The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. 8.f. No Impact: The Project is not located In the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 8.g. Less Than Significant Impact: Access along project area roadways during construction is expected to be maintained so that residents living in the vicinity are not significantly impacted by the project. Due to the temporary nature of the project and the City's requirement for a Traffic Control Plan, the impacts would be less than significant. B.h. Less Than Significant Impact The project area is within an urbanized area and is not prone to wildfires. The impact is less than significant. GAP ANNING120101PA1O-0185 NewPath Networks TM -01 CIIP Ianrilf:0-31 ;tying Ummisslon'\CEQA bilda1 Skidy.dce 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: No ImenU Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Slgnfkant Impact Leas Tran Significant With Mitigation Incomersled Leas Than Significant Impact X a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water Quality? b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been Granted)? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? X d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? X e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f Require the preparation of a protect-soec fic WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of Toss, injury or death Involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X X I j Inundation by seiche. tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: Erosion controls as required by the City's Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be used where necessary along the proposed Project route. The most likely situation for use of these controls will be when construction activities occur near storm drains and in landscaped areas where the slope of hillsides is steep. Examples of control measures that may be used include silt fence, certified weed - free straw wattles an straw bales, and other control measures as necessary resulting in a Tess than significant impact. 9.b. No Impact: The project Involves the Installation of new street light poles and antennas in the public right-of-way. Groundwater will not be impacted. G:IPLANNING120101PA10-0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUPiPtann{no\PlannEne CommisslonlCEOA tnitlal Stttdy.doc 18 9.c.d. No Impact: The project would involve minor construction within the publicly owned right-of-way. The project will not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding. No alteration of the course of a stream or river would occur and no impact would occur. 9.e. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not be adding a significant amount of impervious area to the project area, since such facilities consist of a vertical pole and are constructed adjacent to previously paved areas. 9.f. No Impact: The project would not require the preparation of a WQMP: Thus, no impacts would occur. 9,g. No Impact: The project does not involve placement of housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map, because the project does not include any residential within those zones. No impact would occur. 9.h. No Impact: Any structures proposed to be placed within a 100 -year flood zone will be small and limited to poles, aboveground aerial cables, and underground cables. These will not impede or redirect flows. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 9.1. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, since this is a utility project in the City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way. The impact is cor IIsidere d less than significant-. 9.j. No impact: No portion of the project is subjected to seiche, tsunami or mudlfow. Therefore, no impact would occur. G:IPLANNING120101PA10-0188 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP1Pianning1Planning CommissfonWEQA Studydoc 17 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: issues and Supporting Information Sources Physically divide an established community? Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (Including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Potentlafty Slgrtiiilcant Irrrpacf Leta Than Significant With Mitigation fncarpara(ed Leas Than signlrcant lrnpapi c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Comments: X No inlpsct X X 10.a. No Impact: Installation of the DAS Network entirely within the City owned public right-of-way will not divide an established community. Therefore, no Impacts would occur. 10.b. Less Than Significant impact: The project has been reviewed by the City's Development Review Committee (DRC) for consistency with all applicable plans, policies and regulations, including the City's Telecommunications Ordinance, to ensure the project will have a less than significant impact. 10.c. No impact: None of the Project components are located on lands covered by a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Therefore, no impacts would occur. G:\PLANNiNG'120101PA10-0188 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUPIPIanninplannfng Commisalon\CECIA Initial Study.doc 18 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: issues end Supporting Information Sources Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Result In the Toss of availability of a locally -Important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: Lees Than Potentially Significant With Significant Mltfgallan impact inc-erlev tied Less Than S1flnTcarr[ No Impact Impact X 11.a.b. No Impact According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the zoning classification of MRZ-3a has been applied by the State. MRZ-3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant economic value, based on available data. In addition, the proposed project is to be constructed in the publicly owned right -of --way, which has been previously disturbed by grading, roadway, and sidewalk construction that will not impact any mineral resources. Thus, no impact will occur. G:1Pf=ANNING120101PA10.0180 NewPatrt Networks TM -01 CUPL.PtaapingVe fanning Commlosfon10EQA In1Aal Study,doc .,. iv 12. NOISE. Would the project result In: a Issues and SuppoAMg Information Sources Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundbornenoise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ro"ect? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the prosect? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the ro'ect area to excessive noise levels? Comments: Potentially Significant tmoact Less Than Significant With Mlggagon Incorporated Less Than Significant impact No maact 12.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed Project will increase noise levels only during construction, and only between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday and 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Saturday (No Sundays) as required by City Ordinance 9.20.060.D. No increase in noise levels will occur from the operational phase of the Project because noise -producing equipment will not be part of the Project. The noise impacts associated with the proposed Project are expected to occur in the immediate vicinity of construction equipment. The increased noise levels will occur during mostly daylight hours, when average noise levels from vehicular traffic are generally the highest In addition, the noise increase will not affect any one location for an extended period of time. The noise generated from construction activities would be short term in duration and considered Tess than significant. 12.b. Less Than Significant Impact Construction activity associated with the proposed project would not result in excessive ground-bome noise or perceptive vibration. Removal of pavement and drilling for new poles would create short term, low levels of ground -borne noise and vibrations. No high vibration producing activities such as pile driving, are proposed. Once construction is complete, the proposed project Is not expected to generate vibration or noise. Therefore, impacts associated with construction -related noise and vibrations are considered less than significant. 12.c. No Impact: Once constructed, the DAS system does not produce noise, and therefore, would create no permanent increase in ambient noise levels. Therefore, no impact would occur. 12.d. Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in response (a) above, there would be a shorttterm increase in noise levels during construction; however, due to the short duration and locations, the impacts are considered Tess than significant. G:IPLANNING120101PA10-01 Be NewPath Net%svrks TM -01 CUPiFIannIng\Planntng Comm(aslonICEQA Initial Study.doc 20 12.e. Less Than Significant Impact: This is not a residential or commercial development Project and the nodes are not staffed. Thus, the Project will not result in residents or employees being subjected to airport noise. No impacts will occur. 121. No impact: The project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impact would occur. CAPLANwN0120101PM0-0186 NovRath i'Jetwados Tb4.01 CUPTIanningtPlaneing Comm FFssfonlCEQA Initial Siudy.doc 21 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a b Issues and Supporting Information Sources Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other Infrastructure)? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Potentially Significant Impact Lest Than Significant With Mitigation lncoroonsted Leas Than Significant Impact No Inroad c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: X 13.a. No Impact: The proposed project would not result in substantial population growth in the area because no new homes or businesses are proposed, and no infrastructure related to population growth is proposed. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 13.b. No Impact: No housing would be displaced by the proposed project and no impact would occur. 13.c. No Impact: The project would not displace people or housing, or require replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impact would occur. G:IPLANNING120101PA10-0188 NewPath Net odca TM -01 CUPIPtanning tanning CommissionlCEQA InHlal Study.doc 22 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. No !moat[ Issues end Supporting Information Sources FotentleRy Slgnll#cant Impact Lau Than Slgrdflcant With Mitigation Incornoreted Lass'rhan Sigdileant trn a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? )( Comments: 14.a. No Impact: The project involves the installation of new concrete steel Tight poles or co -location of antenna facilities on an existing pole in the city owned public right-of-way. The project will not introduce any new fire hazards or generate population growth that would require an increase in fire or police protection services. The project would not result in an increase of population or housing in the project area. Therefore no new demand on local schools, parks or public facilities would occur. G:1PLANNlNGV70101PA10-0186 NewPati Networks TM -01 CUP1PlannIng1Planring CommissionlCEQA Itdtfa( Study.doc 15. RECREATION. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: r °G'C:1 G;e l l y Sl;�niGc++++t Lees Than Significant With Less Than Mitigation SIOnlfscont Irrarponfad Pm rpxi No Inya et 15.a. No Impact: The project would not result in an increase of population, which would increase the use of existing parks or other recreation facilities. Therefore. No Impacts would occur. 15.b. No Impact: The proposed project does not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreation facilities. Therefore, no impacts would occur. G:IPLANNINCi120101PA10-01136 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUPWPlannInglPianning CommisslonlCEQA Initial Study.doo 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a b c d issues and Supporting Information Sources Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? LAMB Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant 69ttgallon Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact X X X X Result in inadequate emergency access? e f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Comments: X X 16.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would be constructed over time along roadways in the City of Temecula, ranging from major roadways to residential streets. It is expected that there will be short-term construction related impacts associated with the project. As a result, the Department of Public Works will require an encroachment permit, traffic control plan, and right -of way agreement to address the impacts and reduce them to a level of less than significant impact. 16.b. Less Than Significant impact: Dui to the low number of construction vehicles associated with two aerial crews and two underground work crews required by the proposed project, no changes in the level of service are anticipated. As mentioned above, short -tens construction related impacts will be reduce to a level of fess than significant through Public Works requirements for an encroachment permit, traffic control plan, and right -of way agreement. 16.c. No Impact: Construction and operational traffic associated with the proposed project is not expected to result in a change in air traffic patterns, including an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks given that the new steel light poles will be less than 40 feet high or the new antennas will be co -located on existing utility poles in the city owned public right-of-way. _16.d, Less Than Significant Impact: The project would result in trenching and laying of conduit, construction of new light poles, and aerial and underground installation of fiber optic cable, and installation of pull boxes and hand holes. This would result in potential lane closures, loss of access. and short-term traffic congestion. rAorrn„NNK' G'2n1O PA1O-0166Ne P th Ne fa TM Of CUP;PPloa r P:c, »iTr Com m!a.;Imt',CEQA Irdtla! StutJ.doc 25 Again, the City will require an encroachment permit and traffic control plan to reduce the Impacts to a level of less than significant. 18.e.f. No Impact The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed project and have determined that that there will be no significant Impacts to emergency access. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted plans, policies or programs regarding public transit, bicycle or pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. No impact Is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. OE PL4NNINCO20101PA10-01118 NewPath Net+Nocks TM O1 CUPWfannInfARar rfng Comm h Tan10ECM Mttlal Sludydoc 20 r 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pc:enlally 5innf[irrent InieaCl Less Than SIgrWlcartWith Mitigation Inrnroerated Less Than Significant Imnact No Impact a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable_ Reaional Water Quality Control Board? X b Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? _ X d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 1 X e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 17,a. No Impact: The project is within the publicly owned right-of-way in developed areas within the City of Temecula, which includes streets, curb, gutter, storm drain, sewer drain, and existing utility fines, such as power lines, telephone lines and cable television lines. The project would not generate a demand for water or wastewater treatment, and thus would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.b. No Impact: The project would not require or result in the expansion or construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.c. No Impact: During the construction of the proposed project, all ground disturbances would be limited to the previously developed, and publicly owned right -of way. To avoid impacts to the existing stormwater system, the applicant Is planning to tunnel or bore under existing curbs and gutters where the project proposes to install underground fiber optic communication lines. Therefore, the project would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, and no impacts would occur. 17.d.e. No Impact: The project would not generate a demand for water or wastewater treatment. Therefore, the project would not cause a violation in wastewater treatment requirements, or require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.f.g No Impact: The project will generate a minimal amount of solid waste during construction. The project will include a condition of approval requiring the developer to contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and r;;m1 AhNINO2o1MPA1M156 N Yra_.th Net vrlr�a6 TM11t f J IP1PIami n nn nn Cnrnin!ccInr4rPO0 Sttufy. 27 construction debris. The amount of solid waste generated by the protect would not be substantial or interfere with the sufficient permitted capacity of nearby landfills and there would be no impact. CIAPLANNINO12o1o1PA10O18e NewPaUi NeMIXlar TM O1 CUPS PIanninp\Plantdrp Corn missivniCEQA WSW 6Wdy.doc 2S 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: issuas acid Supporting Infcematian Somas Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potenuatiy Significant Impact Leas Than Significant With Mitigation incomarated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact Does the project have impacts that are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Indirectly? Comments: x X 18.a. Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in the sections above, the project would involve the construction of a utility system and would not significantly impact fish or wildlife resources, nor impact rare, threatened or endangered species. The proposed project with the inclusion of standard conditions of approval and permitting process would not significantly impact cultural or biological resources. 18.b. Less Than Significant Impact No significant cumulative impacts have been identified with the implementation of the proposed project. 18.c. Less Than Significant Impact: No substantial environmental effects that would cause adverse effects on human beings have been identified. 0:IPLANNINS'20101PA10-0186 NewPath Networks TMO1 CUPiPiarming\Planrting Commission\CEQA FntUa! study.doc 29 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should Identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analvses and state where they are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated, describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 19 a.. The City's General Plan, Final Environmental impact Report and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System Map Sets were used as.a referenced source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street in Temecula. The Geographic Information System Map Sets are available online at www.cltyoftemecula.org. 19 b. There were no impacts that were previously addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis. 19 c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. City of Temecula Development Code 5. Supplemental Information provided by NewPath Go Crown Castle as required by the 'City's Telecommunication Ordinance and Conditional Use Permit applications G.:IPLANNING20101PA10-0188 NewPath Networks 7M-01 CUPIPIanninglPlanr ng Cammisssan\CECZA Initial Study.doc 30 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Mitigation Monitoring Program NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project AESTHETICS General Impact: Mitigation Measures Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: AIR QUALITY General Impact Mitigation Measures: Potentially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings New slim -line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street Tight pole to match existing street lights in the right-of-way. If a new street light is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim -line monopole with concrete street Tight base — minus the "cobra" light arm may be acceptable. In rural areas, where street lights don't exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete "street light" type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the planning application review and plan check process. Prior to issuance of a building permit Planning Department Short-term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction Implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM) • Minimize land disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when,hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil Is wet enough to prevent dispersion Cx1PLANNINt 101PR10-0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP1PIanning1Pianning Commission\MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Specific Process: • Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials. Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the planning application review and grading planfencroachrnent pemiit plan check process. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to issuance of associated permits and during construction Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning and Public Works Departments HAZARDS General Impact Mitigation Measure: Directly or indirectly exposing people or structures to potential adverse effects from being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits_ Specific Process; Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the building and grading plan check review process. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department GAPi NNiinisuuiineRzo-ui6ei NovePath Networks TM -01 CUPWPtannIng\Plannlna Commission MMP Mft gatlon Monitarina Program ALTERNATIVE SITE ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT 8.04 CROWN CASTLE INSTALLATION OF DAS COMMUNICATIONS NODE ON A NEW TAPERED LIGHT POLE IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW) E co 9 1- ROW along N/S/O Messina Street 41' E/O Asti Lane, Temecula, CA 92592 Prepared for: J c 0 ++ w_+ 3 E a N 4 LID 1d i ++ Q1 cu N E coCU c U "C7 0 .i a1 0 w Q WO • c00pc • U a. O a U = 'L a o CD Te Lena Hoffmeyer Authorized Crown Castle's Land Use Consultant 714-608-5052 ectus.corn 0 0) COmk-h • r-1 4Em) Cut TMo8mi — DAS Node Installation Public ROW along N/S/O Messina Street, 41' E/O Asti Lane, Temecula, CA cn Fi o�W a '��a)covs U o firz 0 ow z J= CZ • Z 0 o a' cn >, cd o 0 cn smmi cla ca 0. ,a a"i teN U , i- r/] a) Np Z ' ° O Ox- bio b5 ti ,m4 sm, F +;.0 En o A ob cd • gcu - ti' v—' 0 0 ct 0 U a Ua) o A +A ct a v) O sC""i Ocu rd", a �O Q, ° l o U m '—' cd O �+ O› v 0 o ,ci yam, 0 ++ 6. 0�, .5 - v cu ft 0 gl b ° - �, d ;D vii x W'� ob Mw �o cn.2 z_ z�U CID cn N I v� I ( j O z `n U `: U ° CC U et t ed Cd rn ed b RS 6 ed .4 3 ° o 0 0 gb.0 0 o 0 0 c, +� 45 •7 c o ¢ 2 '� " � A.., AvA4 A U Ay., A A3 & N The Foundation for a Wireless World En U U rd C Ct rTi • F--4 O ^l 171� •F.4 C O W IH cd 00 U O cts N cid a) CO O -I--1 .r••I O .,� cC U O Cu ct CL) •r•i O W cn IH rC Z CO 09 Obj3$C- • r .� otwill C/D d- _T =WAVWrMiT • cal 0 0 P. U ZJ 0u uu h • F. ndati. n fora Wireless Wor .1 e Foun . ation or a Wire e Ws r el The Foundation for a Wireless World cz U a) a) a) .- 0 0 c) a) • C/1 Ct (1) 0 CDIDA W w oo e Four's ati . n for . Wir • 1 • W . r1 zw 0. 3J H a' Q uu C h• F s n. ati s n fora Wireless Wor .1 Approved Site Design & Configuration Proposed Streetlight Design Proposed Streetlight Design NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: PA15-0937 Carver Chiu, Crown Castle NG West LLC A Conditional Use Permit for Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street Tight pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -08m1) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the intersection of Asti Way and Messina Street In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694-6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers November 18, 2015 6:00 p.m. The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.citvoftemecuia.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: November 18, 2015 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA15-0520 & PA15-0521, a SUMMARY: Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 4,285 square foot car wash generally located on the northwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road at 28111 Jefferson Avenue RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution recommending City Council approval of the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Lisa Kolieb of Gresham Savage on behalf of Wayne Knyal General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Lot Area: Site: Vacant Land / Community Commercial (CC) North: Existing Commercial Uses / Community Commercial (CC) South: Intersection of Del Rio Road and Jefferson Avenue, Existing Service Commercial Uses / Service Commercial (SC) East: Jefferson Avenue, Existing Highway Tourist Uses / Highway Tourist (HT) West: Del Rio Road, Existing Service Commercial Uses / Service Commercial (SC) Existinq/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required 1.69 Acres Proposed 0.69 Acres Minimum C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDC\10C94C99-D12A-4C64-B250-93BE5D330FD8\11329.docxl Total Floor Area/Ratio: 0.06 Proposed 0.30 Maximum Landscape Area/Coverage: 23% Proposed 20% Minimum Parking Required/Provided: 19 Provided 10 Required BACKGROUND SUMMARY On April 18, 2015, Wayne Knyal, through his representative Lisa Kolieb of Gersham Savage, submitted Planning Application Nos. PA15-0520 and PA15-0521. The applications consisted of a Development Plan and a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a 4,285 square foot express car wash on the northwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road. This express car wash is unique in the sense that vehicles will still move through the facility on a track but vacuuming is performed in self-service stations. The project is located within the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Area. On June 9, 2015 the City Council passed an Urgency Ordinance to temporarily prohibit certain uses and construction in the proposed Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan area until approval of the Specific Plan. Several exemptions to the prohibition were included in the ordinance. One exemption indicated that projects submitted and deemed complete on or before April 28, 2015 could continue through the process provided they were ultimately reviewed by the City Council. The applications for this project were submitted before this date and the project will ultimately be reviewed by the City Council at a public hearing. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The car wash consists of a one-story 4,285 square foot structure. The structure is located adjacent to the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road. The site plan depicts an area adjacent to this intersection for a monument sign. The purpose of this sign is to announce the site and surrounding area as being part of the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan. The City is still determining the design of the monument sign and it will be reviewed under a separate permit once the design phase is complete. A Condition of Approval (No. 50) has been added to ensure this occurs. Two vehicular ingress and egress locations have been provided. The first is located off Jefferson Avenue and the second is located off Del Rio Road. These entrances will lead vehicles to a screened queuing area along Del Rio Road and the covered parking spaces that feature vacuum stations. These parking stalls are located internal to the site. Decorative paving is included at each vehicular entrance. The car wash is based on a self-service model with no individual wash bays. Staff calculated parking requirements based on the 2.5 spaces per wash bay requirement in the Development Code and applied it to the number of cars that can be washed at any one time. The car wash C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDC\10C94C99-D12A-4C64-B250-93BE5D330FD8\11329.docx2 can accept up to four cars at once. Therefore the number of required parking spaces is ten. The applicant has provided nineteen spaces. The covered parking spaces will feature solar arrays. Architecture The project will feature architecture in the Spanish Colonial Revival style. Elements indicative of this style include, but are not limited to: • Roof spires • Arched openings with trim • Tile roofing • Wall sconces • Overhangs with molded details Each of these elements can be found on the proposed structure. A dome will cover the main entrance into the car wash. This dome will be capped with a tile mosaic. The project will also feature windows along Jefferson Avenue. The purpose of these windows is to allow natural light to enter into the facility. The applicant has indicated that these windows will be comprised of acid etched glass. The etched glass will allow light into the wash tunnel while ensuring no public view of the car wash equipment. Landscaping The project will feature a variety of plant materials to soften the visual impacts of the structure and covered parking stalls. There will be approximately twenty-two feet of landscaping between the structure and Jefferson Avenue and approximately eighteen feet of landscaping between shade structure in the queuing area and Del Rio Road. Trees in 36" and 24" box sizes will be included in these areas as well as other parts of the project site. Plants used for the project include, but are not limited to: • Fruitless Olive Trees • Red Crepe Myrtle • Red Kangaroo Paws • Red Trumpet Vine Conditional Use Permit The applicant was required to file a Conditional Use Permit for the project. This permit will govern the operational aspects of the project. Standard hours of operation for the project will be from 7:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. seven days a week. Washes will be completed in three minutes or less. The facility will be supervised by three employees per shift. These employees will include a manager or assistant manager and two customer service attendants. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the U -T San Diego on November 6, 2015 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDC\10C94C99-D12A-4C64-B250-93BE5D330FD8\11329.docx3 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects. The project is within City limits on a site smaller than 5 acres and has been found to be consistent with the General Plan and all applicable Zoning regulations. The project site is a former gas station on a project site surrounded by commercial development. Utilities are available for the use. The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. The use is allowed in the governing zoning district upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit and will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. FINDINGS Development Plan (Section 17.05.010.E) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The use is permitted in the Community Commercial zoning designation upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The project has also been evaluated to ensure compliance with other requirements of the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City including the recently adopted Urgency Ordinance governing the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Area. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to maintain compliance with the Development, Fire, and Building Codes. These codes contain provisions that ensure for the public health, safety, and general welfare. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.04.010.E) 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed use is permitted by the General Plan and Development Code upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDC\10C94C99-D12A-4C64-B250-93BE5D330FD8\11329.docx4 The proposed use will be surrounded by Community Commercial, Service Commercial, and Highway Tourist uses. Therefore, the use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. 3. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The site has been reviewed and determined to be adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission and City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. 4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The conditional use has been reviewed in order to ensure compliance with all requirements of the Development, Building, and Fire Codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. No negative impacts are anticipated. 5. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the City Council. The decision to conditionally approve the applications will be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the City Council. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Development Plan Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit Resolution Exhibit A — Draft Conditions of Approval Statement of Operations Notice of Public Hearing C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDC\10C94C99-D12A-4C64-B250-93BE5D330FD8\11329.docx5 VICINITY MAP Project Site \fr \\Ike F A‘k INGL- ° _-- 200 400 0 800 Fot PLAN REDUCTIONS H H N 06526 VO'V1(D3W31 311N3AV NOS213333f ITIBZ VdS O1fV V1f103W31 NMOldfl 4 pI' $SS 3 � � 'Uft11/;111 11 a 1 i/ 0 Z 0 KEYED NOTES: 06926 VD'VlnD3w31 3fN3AV NOS213d33f IIT8 VdS OlnV V1ft?2W31 NMOldn } x 1 i rem Lai 1 "E�g 3 A fie pp s ill Rg el! a �9 $ 4 log ap ti�i } � } � Z ho d }} s e e4 141 11 8 ig a e r 1§�I}! } lh X211 nei n ! e OB 9e: ifig Ai it l el =�? o iL 11 Y t itIhth 1 w uza I Fug I idoz 1r-900-090-726:NdV 06826 '1:11mawal anuaAV uosaa;;al I1I9Z VdS O1l1V V1f1AW31 NMOldfl �Z o 00 a< cV `�W d .eu wza 1140 ti-900-090-1Z6:NdV 06926 'ormawal anuanV uos a;;ar TTIBZ VdS O1/1V V'1rl73W31 NMOldfl r -,SE J fill "1.:F. T.:1=6=1.--ffill rkI 4 a'_1dtl11111 1 li a AV A,. 6-,6 1-41 A•.r ;411111111111. 14111111111111 V 4C 00 L FIVIKL . DESIGN II GROUP., 1 � F Y 11111; IF! ; ' 4 1r-900-090-T26:NdV 06926 V� 'o�n'amal ninny uos a VdS O1l1V V,n23W31 NMOldl1 S + ,..{.4 E _ c" " t j$ I f i !. .... z" °F W .o-.9 5'N .r." L) 8 case- X TM;n �: i .. ?M sg; - ONINNVId 1 S31111I0V.1 N011V3d336 CIOZb asuaml oiu,01po0 321 f11O311H32iV 3dV0SONV1 dnodO v8e11VH1V £i lViintifW1 1LatoOlVABQ 4i='2;QC31.;I/ 0%36 VS YrnifiL Spar, a a.ra-vsk. 1VANN S,Zf1S vds OJJW v1nowei NMOIdn ludO : tttt w z w rn 2 o� O m J - z f m f = i1 • 1 Y • 34 • J � so • 1 1 1 M1 g i � 1 • 0 7 X 3 L 1s trIVIMPERY IA=sv��ud w rc o vwe - ' n scv i r ONINNVld S31LlI YJ NOLLV3i13321 L IOZY B50BOlI O!00J!103 381110311HOLIV 3dVOSONV1 dflOkfO eider nv morm:lav1NOO OEPLO ND YYK}7BL WANN szne wMO VdS cum d1f103W31 NMOldfl .lo day+ ? I N 0 m o M J N z I -00$ In o - g 1 I 114 1 gbo a iii y "61„J„,,,, ;:7,64:§Z. g • •• 4 i iii N d i i 2{ ! 71p g ,'1 !gill§ g fl 1 Ili li ilvA"1 $ig il ill e 4 Vs a. 6 T3 4gsos 411 g o 0 0 a 0 1 0 1 0 0 i 1 9 z J a. w z 6 0 re z W Ce O. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1- 4 J.. J C 6 Dig 2a W 2 J t W a W 0 I 2 O Y ia N 4 0 s4 ii e Z 0 g t If ig insa#ll5 ia9 yy r .9smi9RmAtrimal M FyQ g l 3 1141 l i Y Yallab.,eeacaal9rireeQ.4 0 2 2 N S FFF iiIIIII P l y 6 pA a NO II II ! Q eer y asg e at , g Y W1e II t i Ng 0 1 yyc1QI1'2I88 F3o;0J' I 1 b 11F i 3It Iltiliiiid i li ;1 1 i 1 1!i1ig1111!: :i;i ! ! 1 fit; l � P a qk a �i g ! V.,' g ilia9115 ! i111 k!nin1151yr-° ®®®®®®®®®®® ®®0000c®®�' ® w 1 II eNE .1 1 %l 1 9 ! " ■a d l: IN!! 0 1p ! _� Ir • P011.:; -41g1. !e fig, li g 2 ;hi : 11 11 i 1eig:x x 8 PI Stl �l4 1/ehli 8 �' 01 ;4 - ll i 1114x;g■ i 11 rig ?Jb1; i z d !Ili! I18Iia `Z1 a1e� P6eli gdli 111 igg 1!U y eg�ay Y iili �g MI�'�agW w 1181 lj°$°8 al�y, w g e a QW� if I1 r5g g $ggar Ii Gtr s■a1 yx 5 aFr`gQ l 9F >: F 61'7 9 4 i'11111 1g relF4 " 6 y� <19 'aa ll % li%- g 11 ai !ill Y 1 m. a�R, DY 01414 Si E CO CV PAVING NOTES a e 1 1 4 7 t1 W 2 W 1- O u d i 1 } i1 fi9 b nW� %'al ga G c 1 Xi $ pel 1 ! P >< l "g/! 1 lb s g�q ;! 011 1 e x !I ix ; 1114 1;! � q 6a ■! pij �q.111161 �® UR 9E a eG r rC! Pei ::::::::: #^ a �'"•1;94 pi$ yPi 41 °e���g#�4 a a�Z�� !F eg �Gg �`laa` ��S s9 �::!: r� �� � � z rB g4 a�y� � Q 1�` �1e 15 e3 a1$n 102 gi_ 1 l n�a a i!e 9 xl3e1r 4�!}E a .!4_ g : 1-61 lv1Pl 1qg gsz 4 0 1611°9@Qyg<a!:9 i a ���■`��l dd r8 �011 3PyQy`� �M �Qb Q�nry�� p 6G eJ R� ��L'�!!ca igi 'IiiI I P1re$A1Qgi;!I ng '� -43 1. 1 gl �g aa! x I l ex Illy ;041. 111- Ili t i itmli)`r a11�1rId1; ��Pgyg � .:° G Q�e � � i � G e p (� Y A ��FY10 41ivg j e Q9 y_,r,X11$�t111ll�:e3g6 2 IT $ pp 6111 as ;1!1 �� 114; gagl !Its r rt91 ggl xx ilf 11 g9g reeFeP t!III II! 1!!§!Q 11r�10■� Q a! °I; ! 1! 1 !l 111 11, r I 119 !ag ;G;a I!: P:,18111e 81 1a PQ ey !II $a I 8 1O 4m■ r'!y gPlgPQ;-1g /41 g; will 6! 111 11 1 4y 111ve11 1 :jj:0 Mil <' ei 1114 gl alE, 1! eea 11 ego!QY 1g y111 �! i1Q!ill' i° Lig /1 6 fli1v eF @� 3g183lEAll Zb`!a g°1aa$1646 1 4 9 e x1qlg;il°: aaag/I a X91. Jli444 g11 41 axa NMg el 1 1 I 3 n & QUANTITIES W 0 z 0 f J 0 W S "s R / \\ ti ,- \\ \r- /.e,. \+ � .:g \ ,__ _ ►may^• "' J \ \ / \ max i f "; \,..,•, \\O'P ,,. '• \\ *e \.�' LD14-XXXGR 0 3 9 Q 1 CITY OF TEMECULA a e F a a 4 .8^ p.• L • Jam`: \ '''*•-.,44,w- •.,Kr.ra' 'Is r• Fir -4- 3 8 5 1 w z z 0 ✓ C zZ 0 SECTION C -C do 1-1 h H i 4 Pli g a g; 1 a l F as g •' 6 r @ g l; Q a s Ywg1agl $a wtei: r iigo og '` ° ai l!i Fe sg 9 4E� 98 ti aiagtri I. 1gi1tlik9ACII! iAvb°:CI eo 11 1 4: ii l 8 i6 i 0 9 ie B Y Y is 4 Y o e ® ®®® 6 ®®® ® ®© ®® ®©®® ®® ,-7'f \�► \ \• \ti►\ F 1 i :i Z 0 F 0 W LD14-XXXGR SECTION B -B 51 I 4 0 ii W i W 16 I F 0 0 Z �Hm ▪ 0 Z sO Z i C 0 n� W w agLL at au Z § E Z au 0u.' z r el Mei .1 Or of . 4 \�.�1 _-'. 1. "S" \! •l \ a i 1 i 1 • 1t • • • h. • AJ 1 a 1 1 CITY OF TEMECULA 0 0< I— Q 5' W zw 1 0 Ig J W 'z f u. 0 7 0 Zw 0- Ni • . t: 1 Lindy RII �A e�tl9 e R gig 11 !leo 11E119 '1.04 114 11 Q� 6i1 4 li�x � i� Atl ler Hp q1p■� i AB�1si� 6 yi pp">z; Ihhhhi 11as a�, eii n�p� �a lir � a 3� f � Iiit/ :E i M �9 . - z61:1 z r `g_ qi ■ 2e �%RR or eIEIL2. g I iiIi� 1! tea p- ;ii:II i ggRod:i e�R■e� Yg■xx5! ill eiQI 11111 III gg `i e IIIq�l1 pili y i xpiltillisi 41 xx �r� Rl ll et -0411 b1P4th`g a s` �W 1ga �.Pili @14611:— ill Qr01011 If 1141 NI�■ri h W F YB _ w .i QUANTITIES z 0 u 111 6 a F. ce 5 v 0 J iI VA II ti 4E II. II 11 11 JEFFERSON AVENUE RIO• et ASHOUT CONTAIN u 4 7 u W f W F Y. 0 o Z YI m O6 J O z ▪ Oy iz O W' ZW O '§ O; W a. a." J J, a e d 1 4 1 1 1 1 0 oli I g ^ne o l! S 2 y iyy� 5 I N, n :I i7 A�t l i 7 i 3 7lp y ;1 3355.55,3333225522 y� pp� rryy5 5 � ill 2 nn a'8533331331§222993:s225333532322332212 n 7 3 n 7+ 9 9 5 5 5 5.3 5 5 3 5 5 9 5 9 3 i 9 5 9 9 9 9 5 9 9 i 9i 15''155552 ;252535,3253 32 92922 82 F3 1°0 308 8855336!!!! 15559555551555555555 \ /'/ \ \- V \ \ \ \ \ \ \ V. ` .� \ \ \\\ \\ < • V. ,114 \ v V \ \ '\ %"\ \ \ 0 5 J 5 1 N r CITY OF TEMECULA Z 65 gra G f u J � OS ON▪ S Vfv W 4 u. Z� NZ o O Ota e JJ, 8 F qo f B 5 s 2 i 0,5555N;555; 5555(i5551t55'555555555; N:5,2 3355.55,3333225522 2855252 2 5 2 n 7 3 n 7+ 9 9 5 5 5 5.3 5 5 3 5 5 9 5 9 3 i 9 5 9 9 9 9 5 9 9 i 9i \ /'/ \ \- V \ \ \ \ \ \ \ V. ` .� \ \ \\\ \\ < • V. ,114 \ v V \ \ '\ %"\ \ \ 0 5 J 5 1 N r CITY OF TEMECULA Z 65 gra G f u J � OS ON▪ S Vfv W 4 u. Z� NZ o O Ota e JJ, 8 F qo f B 5 s 2 i i '1111.011. ]:1111•1 v° | tw \.\,v up. OW la ` ° «�z. •14■� .• � m iia ,. ti i. im/iurl �171.4" e.'+.. . . 71 1 � - it -le - - mi..... -r '4, 1Raw MI„i m• ,,t tis 1111 rr weir4-6 .1111 1 . wi c.. :I, MIMI al a.r .W1. PC DEVELOPMENT PLAN DRAFT RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA15-0520, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OF AN APPROXIMATELY 4,285 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON AVENUE AND DEL RIO ROAD AT 28111 JEFFERSON AVENUE, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 921-060-006) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 18, 2015, Lisa Kolieb of Wayne Knyal/Gresham Savage, filed Planning Application No. PA15-0520, a Development Plan Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on November 18, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA15-0520 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.010.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The use is permitted in the Community Commercial zoning designation upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The project has also been evaluated to ensure compliance with other requirements of the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the X:\Planning\2015\PA15-0520 Buz's 3 Minute Carwash DP\Planning\Hearing\Resolution Development Plan.docx City including the recently adopted Urgency Ordinance governing the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Area. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to maintain compliance with the Development, Fire, and Building Codes. These codes contain provisions that ensure for the public health, safety, and general welfare. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects); The project is within City limits on a site smaller than 5 acres and has been found to be consistent with the General Plan and all applicable Zoning regulations. The project site is a former gas station on a project site surrounded by commercial development. Utilities are available for the use. The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. The use is allowed in the governing zoning district upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit and will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA15-0520, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 4,285 square footage car wash generally located on the northwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road at 28111 Jefferson Avenue, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. X:\Planning\2015\PA15-0520 Buz's 3 Minute Carwash DP\Planning\Hearing\Resolution Development Plan.docx Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 18th day of November, 2015. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 15- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of November, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary X:\Planning\2015\PA15-0520 Buz's 3 Minute Carwash DP\Planning\Hearing\Resolution Development Plan.docx EXHIBIT A DRAFT DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval 1. Filing Notice of Exemption. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA15-0520 Uptown Jefferson Auto Spa Development Plan: A Development Plan application to allow for a 4,644 square foot carwash generally located on the northwest intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road (APN:921-060-006) (Related Application: Conditional Use Permit PA15-0521) 921-060-006 Commercial Retail Commercial Retail Commercial N/A (Non -Residential Project) November 18, 2015 November 18, 2017 2. Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. 4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three (3) one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 5. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 6. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 7 Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 8. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 9. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. 10 Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not maintain or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 11. Paint Inspection. The applicant shall paint a three -foot -by -three-foot section of the building for Planning Division inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 12. Photographic Prints. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 13. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Materials and Colors: Main Wall Stucco - La Habra Stucco (Elastomeric Sand Finish), Color Indian Legend No. A0083 Accent Wall Stucco - La Habra Stucco (Elastomeric Sand Finish), Color Desert Valley No. A0767 Roof - Eagle Roof Clay Tile (Piedmont Blend), Color Terracotta, Maroon, Brown Blend No. 3636 Precast Elements - Valori PreCast, Color Blanco Tile Veneer - Bedrosians Tile Veneer, Colors Bleu, Vert, Ecru Tower Roof - Tile Mosaic 14. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 15. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 16. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 17. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. 18. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 19. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public Art Ordinance as defined in Section 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 20. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit 21. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 22. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 23. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Community Development." 24. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. 25. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation." 26. Archaeological Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property." 27. Tribal Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer." 28. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition." 29. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved." 30. MSHCP Pre -Construction Survey. A 30 -day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30 -day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. 31. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30 -day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." 32. Rough Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 33. Parking Area Landscaping. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. 34. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 35. Downspouts. All downspouts shall be internalized. 36. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 37. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 38. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 39. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 40. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." 41. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 42. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 43. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 44. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for (private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas). Choose those that apply 45. Hardscapinq. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for equestrian trails and pedestrian trails within private common areas. 46. Precise Grading Pians. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 47. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc.) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 48. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 49. Monument Sign. The Uptown Temecula Monument Sign shall not be installed until a design has been finalized by the city. The sign will be reviewed and approved under a sperate permit. The applicant shall continue to reserve the space called out for the sign on the approved plans. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 50. Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 51. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 52. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 53. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 54. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Outside Agencies 55. Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated July 29, 2015, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 56. Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated July 30, 2015, a copy of which is attached. 57. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated August 13, 2015, a copy of which is attached. 58. General. The applicant shall comply with the requirements set forth by the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians in their letter dated August 13, 2015. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 59. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 60. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 61. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 62. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City's Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 63. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 64. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public/private street improvement plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in compliance with Caltrans and City codes/standards; and shall include, but not limited to, plans and profiles showing existing topography, existing/proposed utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. 65. Right -of -Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 66. Signing & Striping Plan. A signing & striping plan, designed by a registered civil engineer per the latest edition of Caltrans MUTCD standards, shall be included with the street improvement plans for approval. 67. Vehicular/Traffic Movement Restrictions. The developer shall comply with the following vehicular movements restrictions: a. The future access onto Jefferson Avenue shall be restricted to a right-in/right-out movement. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 68. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 69. Right -of -Way dedication. Corner property line cut off shall be at the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 70. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction -phase pollution -prevention controls to adequately address non -permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/engineeringconstmanual.htm 71. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 72. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 73. Water Quality Management Pian (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project -specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link below: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/WQMPandNPDES/W QMP.htm 74. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 75. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 100 -year storm event) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 76. Floodplain Development. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the Developer shall demonstrate that the project complies with this Chapter. A Flood Plain Development Permit is required prior to issuance of any permit. 77. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 78. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 79. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) 80. Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 81. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 82. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 83. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City's Paving Notes. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 84. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans shall be approved by Public Works. The developer shall start construction of all public and/or private street improvements, as outlined below, in accordance to the City's General Plan/Circulation Element and corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards to join existing street improvements. a. Jefferson Avenue (Major Arterial (4 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 101 — 100' R/W) to include installation of paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Del Rio Road (Collector (2 lanes undivided) Standard No. 103A — 78' R/W) to include installation paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 85. Street Lights. The developer shall submit a completed SCE street light application, an approved SCE Streetlight Plan and pay the advanced energy fees. If not obtaining a building permit, this shall be done prior to installation of additional street lighting. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing street lights shall be paid by the developer. 86. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer -of -record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil's engineer -of -record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 87. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 88. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 89. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 90. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements 91. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 92. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2013 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2013 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2013 California Energy Codes, 2013 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code. 93. Disabled Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. All ground floor units to be adaptable. b. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. c. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as club house, trash enclose tot lots and picnic areas. 94. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of Tight pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 95. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 96. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 97. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 98. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. 99. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. 100. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 101. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 102. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal 103. Submitting Plans and Calculations. Applicant must submit to Building and Safety four (4) complete sets of plans and two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review and approval including: a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work. b. A Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2013 edition of the California Building Code. c. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. d. Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 104. Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval. 105. Demolition Permits. A demolition permit shall be obtained if there is an existing structure to be removed as part of the project. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 106. Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction 107. Pre -Construction Meeting. A pre -construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements 108. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x (2) 2'/2" outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all Commercial projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system, both public and private for this project. Verification from Rancho California Water Agency will be required to ensure that the required fire flow will be met with the existing public fire hydrants and proposed private fire hydrants. If fire flow cannot be met, then additional fire hydrants may be required. (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020) 109. Fire Hydrant Clearance. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. (CFC Chapter 5) 110. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 111. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 4 -hour duration for commercial projects. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020) Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 112. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not Tess than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 113. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 114. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020) 115. Gradient Of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 116. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 117. Fire Dept. Turnaround. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 118. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 119. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 120. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 121. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). 122. Knox Box. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). 123. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6 -inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 124. Site Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements 125. Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 126. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 127. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 128. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 129. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant Tight fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 130. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 131. Outdoor Lighting During Non -Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor's order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non -business hours. The order, in part, states, "All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non -business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property." Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 132. Commercial or Institution Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 133. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP. 134. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi -tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. 135. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 136. Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45 -inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 137. Public Telephones. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well -lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. 138. Disable Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 139. Employee Training. Employee training regarding retail/credit card theft, citizens' arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit. 140. Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. The applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. 141. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 142. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951) 695-2773. 143. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager -Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT July 29, 2015 City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: Eric Jones Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: PA 15-0520 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 FAX 951.788.9965 www.rcflood.org 171788 AUG - 4 2015 The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District commentslreconunendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comment(s) do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: 1. This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. 2. This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, HENRY OLIVO Engineering Project Manager e: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: Kristi Lovelady SKM:blm Board of Directors President Randy A. Record Vice President David J. Slawson Directors Joseph J. Kuebler, CPA Philip E. Paule Ronald W. Sullivan General Manager Paul D. Jones II, P.E. Treasurer Joseph J. Kuebler, CPA Chairman of the Board, The Metropolitan Water District of So. Calif Randy A. Record Legal Counsel Lemieux & O'Neill EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT July 30, 2015 EMPIRE DESIGN GROUP 24861 WASHINGTON AVE MURRIETA, CA 92562 Dear EMPIRE DESIGN GROUP: Re: SAN53 — Will Serve APN 921-060-006 — Uptown Jefferson Auto Spa Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) is willing to provide sewer service to the subject project. The provisions of service are contingent upon the developer completing the necessary arrangements in accordance with EMWD rules and regulations. EMWD expects the developer to provide proper notification when a water demand assessment is required pursuant to Senate Bill 221 and/or 610. EMWD expects the developer to coordinate with the approving agency for the proper notification. Further arrangements for the service from EMWD may also include plan check, facility construction, inspection, jurisdictional annexation, and payment of financial participation charges. The developer is advised to contact EMWD's New Business Development Department early in the entitlement process to determine the necessary arrangements for service, and to receive direction on the preparation of a facility Plan -of -Service, which is required prior to final engineering. EMWD's ability to serve is subject to limiting conditions, such as regulatory requirements, legal issues, or conditions beyond EMWD's control. Expiration - one year from date of issue Thank you for your cooperation in serving our mutual customers. If you have any questions, please call me at (951) 928-3777, extension 4309. Sincerely, ' Edmund Chew Civil Engineering Associate II New Business Development Eastern Municipal Mailing Address: Post Office Box 8300 Perris, CA 92572-8300 Telephone: (951) 928-3777 Fax: (951) 928-6177 Location: 2270 Trumble Road Perris, CA 92570 Internet: www.emwd.org - ',Ms a co z 3C1N3AV NOSti3JJ3f MBE .1.11 Z (MGM "VirlD3W31 livri 1 Vd5 oinv NOSti3Jfl A.0 NMOld 1,01 1�1 est. 11t1[-11 iFORNI.t 11.1 if,), J)f5 fttlf Board of Directors John E. Hoagland President James "Stew" Stewart Sr Vice President Stephen J. Corona Ben R. Drake Lisa D. Herman William E. Plummer Roger C. Ziemer Officers Matthew G. Stone General Manager Richard S. Williamson, P.F. Assistant General Manager .Jeffrey D. Armstrong CFO/Treasurer Fred F. Edgeromb, MPA Director of Operations & Maintenance Andrew L. Webster, P.E. Chief Engineer Kelli E. Garcia District Secretary James B. Gilpin Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel August 13, 2015 Eric Jones City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY UPTOWN JEFFERSON AUTO SPA 28111 JEFFERSON AVENUE; CASE/PLAN NUMBER PA15-0520; LOT NO. 9 OF TRACT MAP NO. 3751; APN 921-060-006 [AGRICARE PROPERTIES, LLC] Dear Mr. Jones: Please be advised that the above -referenced project/property is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD/District). The subject project/property fronts an existing 16 -inch diameter water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Del Rio Road, and an existing 24 -inch diameter water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Jefferson Avenue. Water service to the subject project/property exists (under Account No. 3004247, Location No. 2003346). Additions or modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Where private on-site water facilities (for water service, fire service, irrigation, or other purpose) will cross or will be shared amongst multiple lots/project units (only by special variance of the Rules and Regulations), and/or where such `common' facilities will be owned and maintained by a Property Owners' Association, RCWD requires execution and recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement or equivalent document of covenants, codes, and restrictions. Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is subject to water supply shortage contingency measures in effect (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances and policy), and/or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment for the development, as determined by the Lead Agency. Rancho California Water District 12135 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6500 Letter to Eric Jones/City of Temecula August 13, 2015 Page Two In accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5, the project/property will be required to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation, which should be noted as a condition for any subsequent development plans. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. As soon as feasible, and prior to the preparation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project -specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration . If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project -specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided Municipal Water District. If no sewer service is currently available to project/property, all proposed waste discharge systems must comply with the Resources Control Board and/or health department requirements. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Services Representative at the District office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Kim Kerckhoff Engineering Services Representative (:c: Corey Wallace, Engineering Manager-CIP & Development Phillip Dauben, Associate Engineer Heath McMahon, Construction Contracts Manager Corry Smith, Engineering Services Supervisor Valerie Salampessy, Empire Design Group, Inc. 15\K K: hab030\F450\FEG by Eastern the subject State Water Engineering Rancho California Water District -121:35 Winrhe5ter Road • Post Office Box 901.7 • Temecula. California 92589-901 7 • 1951) 290)9900 • FAX 1951) 296-01410 FECITIANGA CULTURAL RESOURCES Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians VIA E -Mail and USPS Mr. Eric Jones Associate Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Post Office. Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92593 Telephone (951) 308-9295 • Fax (951) 506-9491 August 13, 2015 A1% 1 7 2015 Chairperson: Mary Bear Magee Vice Chairperson: Darlene Miranda Committee Members: Evie Gerber Bridgett Barcello Maxwell Richard B. Scearce, III Neal Ibanez Michael Vasquez Director: Gary DuBois Coordinator: Paul Macarro Planning Specialist: Tuba Ebru Ozdil Cultural Analyst: Anna Hoover Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments Concerning Buz's 3 Minute Carwash Development Plan; PA15-0520; PA15-0521 Dear Mr. Jones; This comment letter is submitted by the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians (hereinafter, "the Tribe"), a federally recognized Indian tribe and sovereign government, in response to a request for information by the City. The Tribe formally requests, pursuant to Public Resources Code §21092.2, to be notified and involved in the entire CEQA environmental review process for the duration of the above referenced project (the "Project"). If you have not done so already, please add the Tribe to your distribution list(s) for public notices and circulation of all documents pertaining to this Project. The Tribe further requests to be directly notified of all public hearings and scheduled approvals concerning this Project. Please also incorporate these comments into the record of approval for this Project. Tribe submits these comments concerning the Project's potential impacts to cultural resources and to assist the City in developing appropriate avoidance and preservation standards to protect and preserve sensitive and important cultural resources that may be impacted by the proposed Development. The Tribe understands that the site was previously graded and a Notice of Exemption will be filed; however, because there is no map confirming what areas were graded to which depth, it is impossible at this stage to determine which sections of the Project was graded below the 1 -foot level. As such, we request tribal and archaeological monitoring during all earthmoving activities, excluding concrete and ac paving removal. We also request tribal and archaeological monitoring during utility trenching for this Project, if it should occur. Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments for Buz's 3 Minute Carwash August 13, 2015 Page 2 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES The Tribe understand that the Property has been subject to previous disturbance, as the Project site lies within a culturally sensitive area of Payomkawichum territory. The Tribe believes that there is a possibility for the recovery of subsurface resources during earthmoving activities. At this time, the Tribe asks that, at a minimum, the City include the following as conditions of approval. COA 1 Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground -disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. COA 2 At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement between the Applicant/Developer and the Tribe. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. COA 3 Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre - grading report with the City of Temecula (if required by the City) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity observation which will be determined in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in MM 2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592 Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments for Buz's 3 Minute Carwash August 13, 2015 Page 3 COA 4 If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in MM 2. COA 5 All cultural materials, that are collected during the grading monitoring program , with the exception of sacred items, burial goods and human remains which will be addressed in the Treatment Agreement required in MM2 shall be tribally curated according to the current professional repository standards. The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to the Pechanga Tribe's curation facility which meets the standards set forth in 36 CRF 79 for federal repositories. All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. COA 6 If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and/or City Council. The Tribe reserves the right to fully participate in the environmental review process, as well as to provide further comment on the Project's impacts to cultural resources and potential mitigation for such impacts. Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band of Luise& Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592 Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments for Buz's 3 Minute Carwash August 13, 2015 Page 4 The Pechanga Tribe looks forward to working together with the City of Temecula in protecting the invaluable Luiseao cultural resources found in the Project area. Please contact me at 951.770.8113 or at eozdil@pechanga-nsn.gov once you have had a chance to review these comments. Thank you. Since Tuba Ebru Ozdil Planning Specialist cc: Pechanga Office of the General Counsel Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseno Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592 Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need PC CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRAFT RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA15-0521, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 4,285 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON AVENUE AND DEL RIO ROAD AT 28111 JEFFERSON AVENUE, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 921-060-006) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 18, 2015, Lisa Kolieb of Wayne Knyal/Gresham Savage, filed Planning Application No. PA15-0521, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on November 18, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA15-0521 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.010.E A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the general plan and the development code. The proposed use is permitted by the General Plan and Development Code upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit. X:\Planning\2015\PA15-0520 Buz's 3 Minute Carwash DP\Planning\Hearing\Resolution Minor Conditional Use Permit - Copy.docx B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed use will be surrounded by Community Commercial, Service Commercial, and Highway Tourist uses. Therefore, the use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The site has been reviewed and determined to be adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission and City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The conditional use has been reviewed in order to ensure compliance with all requirements of the Development, Building, and Fire Codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. No negative impacts are anticipated. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the City Council. The decision to conditionally approve the applications will be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the City Council. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects); X:\Planning\2015\PA15-0520 Buz's 3 Minute Carwash DP\Planning\Hearing\Resolution Minor Conditional Use Permit - Copy.docx The project is within city limits on a site smaller than 5 acres and has been found to be consistent with the General Plan and all applicable Zoning regulations. The project site is a former gas station on a project site surrounded by commercial development. Utilities are available for the use. The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. The use is allowed in the governing zoning district upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit and will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA15-0521, a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the operation of an approximately 4,285 square footage car wash generally located on the northwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road at 28111 Jefferson Avenue, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. X:\Planning\2015\PA15-0520 Buz's 3 Minute Carwash DP\Planning\Hearing\Resolution Minor Conditional Use Permit - Copy.docx Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 18th day of November, 2015. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairman ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of November, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary X:\Planning\2015\PA15-0520 Buz's 3 Minute Carwash DP\Planning\Hearing\Resolution Minor Conditional Use Permit - Copy.docx EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA15-0521 Uptown Temecula Auto Spa Conditional Use Permit: A Conditional Use Permit application to allow for the operation of a car wash generally located on the northwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road (APN: 921-060-006) (Related application: Development Plan PA15-0520) 921-060-006 Commercial Retail Commercial Retail Commercial N/A (Non -Residential Project) November 18, 2015 November 18, 2017 Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 2. Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three (3) one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 4. Conformance with Approved Pians. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 5. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 6. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 7. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 8. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not maintain or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 9. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 10. Statement of Operations. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated submitted on April 18, 2015, on file with the Planning Division, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. 11. Revocation of CUP. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 12. City Review and Modification of CUP. The City, its Director of Community Development, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Director of Community Development, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in -lieu of, the right of the City, its Director of Community Development, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 13. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements 14. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x (2) 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all Commercial and multi-family projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 15. Fire Hydrant Clearance. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. (CFC Chapter 5) 16. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 17. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for commercial projects. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 18. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 19. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 20. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020) 21. Gradient Of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 22. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 23. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 24. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 25. Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 26. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). 27. Knox Box. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). 28. Addressing. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial, multi -family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6 -inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi -family residential units shall have 4 -inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 29. Site Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS UPTOWN TEMECULA AUTO SPA Statement of Operations Uptown Temecula Auto Spa is a fully automated car wash which will be supervised by three employees per shift including a manager or assistant manager and two customer service attendants. Standard hours of operation will be from 7:00 am until 9:00 pm seven days per week. Although only 10 parking are required, 19 parking spaces will be provided, which includes 17 vacuum spaces, including 1 ADA space, and 2 standard parking spaces for employees. Uptown Temecula Auto Spa will have room to stack cars at multiple automated attendants with about three to four cars lengths between the auto attendant and the conveyor entrance. The site is engineered for optimum traffic flow, with proper turning radii making the customer's approach easy and unchallenging, capable of cleaning 80 cars per hour or more. Based upon the typical number of customers at similar locations throughout the United States, the Auto Spa expects to have an average of 300 customers per day. As a result of the efficiency of the car wash equipment, the site is engineered to ensure a customer wait time of five minutes or less—regardless of whether there are two or ten customers in the queue. The Auto Spa will offer a fully automated Tunnel Wash where customers will determine what services they want and pay at the automated pay stations, will enter when the gate opens, progress through the tunnel where the wash services (including on-line extras) will be performed in 3 minutes or less. Regardless of the wash service or any extras selected, the wash service takes the same time to deliver. Customers can then choose to exit the facility or go to the free self-service vacuum stations to vacuum the interior of their cars. The wash equipment will be a conveyorized, mechanical system using state-of-the-art friction and high pressure wash equipment. The drying system will use forced -air drying as well as the new textile drying system. The wash - solutions will be managed by a computer control, closed-loop process. All aspects of the sales and delivery process will be controlled by state-of-the-art computer system. The wash process will be one of application of cleaning surfactants to the vehicle surface, soil loosening by both friction and high pressure wash equipment; rinsing and application of surface protectants and then drying. The Auto Spa uses eco -friendly wash solution specifically formulated to not impact the environment. The wash solutions consist of soaps, conditioners, and polymer waxes. All wash solutions will be stored within the equipment room of the car wash and locked up when the car wash is closed. No hazardous materials will be used or stored onsite. 2 K437-000 -- 1556724,4 UPTOWN TEMECULA AUTO SPA Live surveillance cameras will be strategically placed to provide real-time observations by the home office for both security and operational assistance. State-of-the-art computer systems will monitor the equipment operation and notify on-site management and centralized service of any equipment malfunction. Approval of the Project will benefit the community. The strength and foundation of an express car wash is the ability to supply a convenient, consistent, fast, easy and predictable value to its customers. While express car washing is not new, innovations in equipment, chemicals, cleaning media, and philosophy are. Express washing is a well-planned and engineered program proven to provide high levels of customer satisfaction, reduced water usage, "cleaner" water usage and easier operation. The ruling principle behind the express model is to provide a convenient, low cost, efficient and high quality car wash, as well as free access to vacuums. Express customers may opt for "extra" on-line services including tire shine, triple foam, or other on-line services offered by the automated attendant without experiencing the un - welcomed, pressured sales pitch of the human sales attendant. Customers whose cars are filled with sensitive work materials, a sleeping baby, groceries or other items, which, in a full service car wash would require their removal and/or storage prior to having their car washed, find the express far less intrusive and a more comfortable service arrangement. Exterior and full service car wash models are very different, with express car washes being comparable to the automated car washes found at many automobile service stations. With a full service car wash, customers must exit their vehicle and wait in waiting area while a car wash employee washes and dries their car. Full service car washes also typically have a separate area for detailing and more specialized wash services. The full service carwash is complete when all the employees finish touching the car up at the exit end after the wash process has been completed. Typical wait times can be around 30 minutes. To the contrary, with an express wash the customer rides through the wash tunnel in their vehicle, and unless the customer decides to vacuum the interior of the vehicle in one of the self-service vacuum bays, he or she never leaves the vehicle. The express wash is completely automated and performed by equipment in the wash tunnel, and is complete as the vehicle exits the tunnel. Customers who do not use the vacuum service are in and out in less than 5 minutes. 3 K437-000 -- 1556724 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: PA15-0520 & PA15-0521 Lisa Kolieb A Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of an approximately 4,285 square foot car wash generally located on the northwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road at 28111 Jefferson Avenue In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects) Eric Jones, (951) 506-5115 City of Temecula, Council Chambers November 18, 2015 6:00 p.m. The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orrq. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www,citvofterTlecula.orq — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Community Development Department, (951) 694-6400.